HomeMy WebLinkAboutAtt A - AmendedAMENDED ATTACHMENT A
CHARTER UPDATE COMMITTEE
MINUTES
City Council Chambers
Thursday, June 21, 2012
4:00 p.m.
I. CALLED MEETING TO ORDER — 4:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Present: Chairman Paul Watkins and Members David Bahnsen, Paul Glowienke, Jeff
Herdman, Suzanne Savary, Joseph Stapleton, Dan Wampole (arrived at 4:27 p.m.),
Mayor Nancy Gardner, Council Member Steve Rosansky
City Staff: City Manager Dave Kiff, City Attorney Aaron Harp, City Clerk Leilani Brown, Acting
Assistant City Attorney Michael Torres, Assistant to the City Manager Rob Houston,
Public Information Manager Tara Finnigan, and Finance Director Tracy McCraner
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS
In response to Ron Hendrickson's question, Chairman Watkins confirmed that it is being
proposed that Section 407 (Regular Meeting) be brought back to further clarify Committee's June
14 action.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR THE JUNE 14. 2012 CHARTER UPDATE COMMITTEE
MEETING
Amended
Chairman Watkins stated that the handouts from the last meeting were posted on the City's
website. He also stated that, on June 14, Robert Hawkins faxed a letter to the Committee which
indicated that he believed that City Manager Kiff had a conflict relative to bonds in Section 503
([City Manager] Compensation and Bond). He stated that, following the June 14 Charter Update
Committee meeting, he raised this issue with Acting Assistant City Attorney Torres who indicated
that City Manager Kiff does not have a conflict since the Committee rejected staff's
recommendation and kept the bond requirement in place; (2) City Manager Kiff's contract with the
City provides that the City will pay/reimburse the premium for the bonds; and (3) Charter Section
611 (Official Bonds) provides, in part, that premiums on official bonds will be paid for by the City.
Therefore, regardless of whether the bond is kept in place or removed City Manager Kiff's
financial interests are not affected because under Charter Section 611 and his contract, the City
is obligated to pay the bond premiums.
Member Herdman noted that Acting Assistant City Attorney Torres provided the Committee with
information regarding the Los Angeles court case regarding class action lawsuits (Section 1114 -
Claims and Demands).
Jim Mosher asked if the Los Angeles court case information was available to the public. He
noted that he submitted written comments about the minutes and requested that general be
changed to generally, and principals be changed to principles on page 3.
weDan Purcell noted that consideration of the minutes was conducted out of order and before public
comments on agenda items.
Motion by Member Glowienke, seconded by Member Bahnsen to waive reading of the subject
minutes, approve as amended, and order filed.
Charter Update Committee
Meeting Minutes
June 21, 2012
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Bahnsen, Glowienke, Herdman, Savary, Stapleton, Chairman Watkins
Noes: None
Absent: Wampole
V. CHARTER SECTION DISCUSSIONS
City Manager Kiff noted that "centralized" will remain in Section 504(e) (Powers and Duties) and
will read, "Establish and maintain a centralized purchasing system for all City offices, departments
and agencies."
Motion by Member Herdman, seconded by Member Stapleton to approve the
recommendation so that Section 504(e) (Powers and Duties) states, "Establish and maintain a
centralized purchasing system for all City offices, departments and agencies."
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Bahnsen, Glowienke, Herdman, Savary, Stapleton, Chairman Watkins
Noes: None _
Absent: Wampole ��
Regarding Section 421 (Contracts. Execution), Acting Assistant City Attorney Torres reported
that the City is in compliance with the current language; however, the amendment is being
proposed to clarify how the City currently handles contracts.
Regarding Section 425 (City Hall), City Manager Kiff reported that most administrative offices are
located at City Hall, but there are some that are not, i.e. Police and Lifeguard administration. He
stated that amending the section would also clarify the location of City Hall. He noted that Ron
Hendrickson provided written suggestions that would indicate that the property is City -owned and
keeps the reference to when the Charter amendment occurred.
Chairman Watkins stated that the recommendation from Ron Hendrickson for Section 425 would
read, "City Hall, including most administrative offices of the City and- addiministrative „ffi,.es Af the
city of niewpert Beach, and related parking, shall be located on aPd-v ithe 282 arse Vf
real property owned by the Gity of Newport BeaGh deSGribed as PaFGel 3 of parGel Map No. 90
61 in the Gity of Newport BeaGh the City -owned parcel, which is bounded by Avocado Ave. on
Amended '2
the west, San Miguel Dr. on the north, a44d-MacArthur Blvd. on the east, and the Newport Beach
Central Library on the south (Added by amendment effective March 3, 2008)."
In response to Committee questions, City Manager Kiff acknowledged that the proposed
Amended rL=>language in Section 425 (City Hall) may be at odds with the reality of the location of the new City
Hall for a short period of time following the vote on November 6, 2012, but the important point to
keep in mind is that the proposed language is helpful in providing flexibility in the case of some
administrative offices being located at a place within the City other than the new City Hall.
George Schroeder expressed support for the proposed changes to Section 425, pointing out that
the City will also probably be building new facilities throughout the City.
Jim Mosher noted that the Library administration offices are also currently not located at City Hall
(Section 425). Regarding Section 421, he believed that the proposal is a complete rewrite of the
Charter Section and took issue that it would allow the City Manager and other employees to
obligate the City with or without a written contract in place. He stated that the City should always
require a written contract.
2
Charter Update Committee
Meeting Minutes
June 21, 2012
Regarding Section 421, Novell Hendrickson believed that the verbiage should remain as is in
order to protect the City.
City Attorney Harp clarified that the proposed language matches the City's current practice and is
not a substantive change.
Member Glowienke noted that there will be a direct line of culpability since Council already
determines who can execute contracts (Section 421).
In response to Committee questions, Acting Assistant City Attorney Torres indicated that the
current practice is to also have the City Attorney approve the form of contracts and the City Clerk
attest the signature.
Motion by Member Bahnsen, seconded by Member Stapleton to approve the recommended
changes to Section 421 as proposed.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Bahnsen, Glowienke, Herdman, Savary, Stapleton, Chairman Watkins
Noes: None V _
Absent: Wampole
Member Wampole arrived at 4:27 p.m.
Motion by Member Bahnsen, seconded by Member Herdman to amend Section 425 to ready,
"City Hall, including most administrative offices of the City and administrative offir.es of the City of
Newport Bean -h -,--and related parking, shall be located on of d ,Arithin the 1-2.8-2 ,^res of real
property owned by the City c)f NewpGrt -Rp--;;r--h despribed as parr -el 3 of parGel Map No. 90 36
the Cit„ of Newport BeaG-h the City -owned parcel, which is bounded by Avocado Ave. on the
west, San Miguel Dr. on the north, and -MacArthur Blvd. on the east, and the Newport Beach
Central Library on the south (Added by amendment effective March 3, 2008)."
Regarding leaving in the text that references the amendment date in Section 425, Acting
Assistant City Attorney Torres stated that doing so would be the exception to the Charter since
there will already be a historical thread after any section that undergoes an amendment.
Amended motion by Member Glowienke, seconded by Member Bahnsen to amend Section
425, to read, "City Hall, including most administrative offices of the CitLr And Administrative „ffi, oc
of the City of Ne w pert Roach and related parking, shall be located on and within the 12.82 aures
361 in the City of Ne wpei4 Roonh the City -owned parcel, which is bounded by Avocado Ave. on
the west, San Miguel Dr. on the north, an4-MacArthur Blvd. on the east, and the Newport Beach
Central Library on the south."
The amended motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Bahnsen, Glowienke, Herdman, Savary, Stapleton, Wampole, Chairman Watkins
Noes: None
Absent: None
Upon the advice of the City Attorney, Mayor Gardner and Council Member Rosansky
recused themselves from discussions relative to Section 402-A (Compensation)
(recommended to be renumbered Section 402), Section 402-B (Reimbursement for
Expenses), and Section 404 (The Mayor. Mayor Pro Tempore).
3
Charter Update Committee
Meeting Minutes
June 21, 2012
Regarding Section 402-A (Compensation), Section 402-B (Reimbursement for Expenses), and
Section 404 (The Mayor. Mayor Pro Tempore), City Attorney Harp reported that the amended
language places Sections 402-A and 402-B into one Section, and updates the dollar amount to
reflect current amounts.
Chairman Watkins pointed out that specific Consumer Price Index (CPI) references were included
and that the dollar amount is being updated to reflect what has occurred since the 1980
amendment.
Member Glowienke received confirmation that the $1,237.35 amount is the end product arrived
from the 1980 $441.15 amount including CPI or 5%, whichever is less.
City Manager Kiff discussed comparative stipend and allowance, auto allowance, health benefit,
and retirement contributions for Anaheim, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Laguna Hills, Orange, and
Mission Viejo. He noted that Anaheim is the only city that provides its Council Members with auto
allowance. He stated that the yearly average total compensation for a Newport Beach Council
Members is $24,200, and the approximate averages for Anaheim is $32,000; Huntington Beach is
$32,500; Irvine is $30,300; Laguna Hills is $22,190; Orange is $27,500; and Mission Viejo is
$25,800.
In response to Committee questions, City Manager Kiff noted that Council Members can opt out
of receiving compensation and, in past years, have chosen to not accept the CPI increases. He
stated that Section 900 (Retirement System) discusses health benefits provided to non-safety
employees through the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), but
emphasized that Section 900 is not in the Committee's scope of work.
George Schroeder suggested that the City look at the total compensation given to Council
Members, believed that most of the Council Members already make a good living, took issue with
potential automatic raises on July 1, and questioned why Council needs retirement benefits.
Jim Mosher pointed out that original Section 402-A (Compensation) does not give Council any
compensation and Section 402-B (Reimbursement for Expenses) only provided for
reimbursements. He believed that the new language is substantive and that the original language
was not intended to convert reimbursement into compensation.
Dan Purcell expressed the opinion that the current amount is too high and that if four years worth
of money was provided in advance to Council Members, the public might look at it differently.
Scott Peotter questioned why the Mayor receives more compensation than Council Members. In
response, City Manager Kiff indicated that he is not sure why the Mayor receives more, but
assumes it is because the Mayor has more obligations and duties. Mr. Peotter believed that the
Amended rL=>pay differential should be looked at and recommended that the Council not receive any retirement
benefits. He also suggested rounding the dollar amount.
Amended Lr=>Finance Director McCraner reported that Council or any City employee is not allowed by law to
opt out of CaIPERS due to IRS rules.
City Manager Kiff noted that, if this is a controversial item for the Charter Amendment, Council
may decide to not consider Section 402. He pointed out that the money provided to Council is
reflected on a W-2 from the City.
Member Bahnsen indicated that a Council Member's financial status should not be a
consideration in this matter. He pointed out that the City's compensation is in line with
surrounding cities and, in some cases, not close to others. He expressed support for the
amendment.
4
Charter Update Committee
Meeting Minutes
June 21, 2012
Motion by Member Bahnsen, seconded by Member Glowienke to approve the recommended
changes to Sections 402-A, 402-B and 404, as proposed.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Bahnsen, Glowienke, Herdman, Savary, Stapleton, Wampole, Chairman Watkins
Noes: None
Absent: None
Regarding Section 608 (Illegal Contracts. Financial Interests), Chairman Watkins referenced
alternate language that was included as Attachment D to the agenda packet and noted that, since
Charter cities also must follow Government Code Section 1090 et seq., the alternate language
streamlines the intent of the Section. He stated that he has read the written concerns by Robert
Hawkins and Jim Mosher, and believed that the alternative language is a good solution.
Member Glowienke indicated that he prefers the specificity of the proposed language to assist the
public in understanding the Section. He further questioned whether the 3% threshold should be
increased.
Jim Mosher noted that being a Charter City allows the City to do things differently than State law
and recommended not making any amendments to Section 608. He stated that the proposed
language incorporates Committees but the Charter has not defined it, and believed that
Committees should be formed similarly to Boards and Commissions.
Members Herdman and Savary expressed support for the proposed language, not the alternate
language.
Member Stapleton indicated that, since Government Code Section 1090 is easy to find, he
supports the alternative language.
Motion by Member Glowienke, seconded by Member Savary to approve the recommended
change to Section 608, as proposed.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Bahnsen, Glowienke, Herdman, Savary, Stapleton, Wampole, Chairman Watkins
Noes: None
Absent: None
City Manager Kiff indicated that a written comment from Planning Commissioner Larry Tucker
expressed support for removing Section 707(c) (Planning Commission. Powers and Duties.) in
its entirety because the clearing and rebuilding of blighted or substandard areas would be
resolved by Code Enforcement, Public Works, or another department.
Regarding Section 708 (Board of Library Trustees. Powers and Duties.), City Manager Kiff stated
that he is now recommending that the Section not be changed. He noted that he has spoken to
HEEi=>Elizabeth Stahr and that he does not have an issue with the Board of Library Trustees reviewing
Library Director selections.
City Manager Kiff reported that the change to Section 709 (Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Commission. Powers and Duties.) deals with the review of the annual budget and that Council
can direct staff to have the commission review the budget if desired.
Chairman Watkins also noted that the first sentence of Sections 707, 708 and 709 have been
updated to be consistent. He suggested changing recommended to recommend in Section 707.
5
Charter Update Committee
Meeting Minutes
June 21, 2012
Amended Regarding Section 708, Member Savary agreed with not amending the section, noting that
changes to this Section have been voted down repeatedly. Mayor Gardner indicated a desire to
leave the Section unchanged, but expressed support for Section 708(d) as proposed: "Make
recommendations to the City Manager regarding Approve or disapprove the appointment,
suspension or removal of the Libraryian Director, who shall be the department head." She stated
that the City Council hires the City Manager to select these types of positions. Council Member
Rosansky stated that the library has much different uses than in the past, so does not have the
same concerns as when the Section was first adopted. He expressed support for Mayor
Gardner's suggestion but indicated that the Section can be removed from consideration if it is
going to hinder approval of the other Charter Section Amendments. Members Glowienke and
Bahnsen expressed support for changing proposed Section 708(d).
Amended Member Savary believed that, as it relates to the library, there needs to be something outside of
the City Manager's control since the library is becoming more of a cultural arts center.
Member Glowienke questioned why some Boards and Commissions have five members and
some have seven members.
Amended George Schroeder expressed concern that amending Section 708 would affect the chances of
the Charter being amended. He pointed out that the library has consistently ranked high in citizen
surveys and believed that the vote in 1994 was probably to ensure that the library does not
become susceptible to politics. Regarding the consistent language in Sections 707, 708 and
709, he believed that may should be removed.
Amended Jim Mosher suggested not changing Section 707(c) and questioned if the reference to Master
Plan in Section 707(a) might be what is now called a General Plan; agreed with removing may in
the three Sections; expressed support for the current language in Section 708; and believed that
the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission should review the budget (Section 709), not just
City staff.
Novell Hendrickson believed that shall should be added to all the sections; questioned why the
Planning Commission is the only citizen body that receives a stipend; and disagreed with
removing Section 707(c), amending Section 708 in any fashion, and removing the budget review
from Section 709.
Dan Purcell questioned whether a dollar limit should be placed on Public Works projects that
would require Planning Commission review (Section 707), and asked who the public is supposed
to report any complaints about the Library Director or any other department head to. He
expressed support for having the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission review the budget
(Section 709).
Due to the time and in response to Chairman Watkins' question, City Attorney Harp confirmed
that these Sections can be brought back at the next meeting without having public comment;
however the public may comment on the Sections during Public Comments on Agenda Items.
Member Glowienke suggested voting on Sections 707 and 709.
Motion by Member Glowienke, seconded by Member Wampole to approve the recommended
change to Section 707, including striking out Section 707(c) in its entirety, changing
recommended to recommend, changing Master Plan to General Plan, and removing may from
the first sentence of the proposed language.
N.
Charter Update Committee
Meeting Minutes
June 21, 2012
The motion carried by the following roll call vote
Ayes: Bahnsen, Glowienke, Herdman, Savary, Stapleton, Wampole, Chairman Watkins
Noes: None
Absent: None
Motion by Member Glowienke, seconded by Member Wampole to approve the recommended
change to Section 709, including the removal of may from the first sentence of the proposed
language.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Bahnsen, Glowienke, Herdman, Stapleton, Wampole, Chairman Watkins
Noes: Savary
Absent: None
Member Savary requested more information about the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Commission's role.
VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS - None
VII. ADJOURNMENT - Adjourned at 5:46 p.m. to Thursday, June 28, 2012, at 4:00 p.m. in the
Events Center at the OASIS Senior Center, 801 Narcissus, Corona del
Mar, 92625
The agenda was posted on June 18, 2012, at 2:05 p.m. on the City Hall Bulletin Board located
outside of the City of Newport Beach Administration Building.
City Clerk
7
Recording Secretary
Chairperson