HomeMy WebLinkAboutTidelands Management Committee Agenda - April 23, 2014This Comm
agenda be
comment o
the Commiperson.
It is the inte
an attendee
Newport Bein appropri
Act of 1990
the City Cle
if accommo
1) CAL
2) ROL
3) PUB
Publ
subje
Befo
has
prov
phon
4) APP
5) ON-G
A.
6) CUR
A.
mittee is subjec
posted at leas
on agenda items
ttee. The Com
ention of the Cit
e or a participa
each will attempate alternative
0 (42 U.S.C. Sec
erk’s Office at le
odation is feasib
LL MEETING
LL CALL
BLIC COMME
lic comments
ect matter ju
ore speaking,
the discretio
ided the time
nes off or set
PROVAL OF M
GOING BUSI
Tidelands C
Receive and
RRENT BUSIN
Lower Casta
The Harbor
Lower Casta
ct to the Ralph
st seventy-two
s before the Com
mittee may lim
ty of Newport B
ant at this meet
pt to accommodformats to pers
c. 12132), and t
east forty-eight
ble at (949) 644-
CITY OF
TIDELA
Civic Cent
Communit
Wednesda
Tidelands
Mike
Citizens A
Lind
Jam
Don
Staff Memb
Dav
Chr
__________
TO ORDER –
ENTS
s are invited o
urisdiction of
we invite, bu
on to extend
e limit adjustm
them in the s
MINUTES – M
INESS
Capital Plan
d file attached
NESS
aways Park –
Commission
aways Park, a
M. Brown Act.
(72) hours in a
mmittee and ite
it public comm
Beach to comply
ting, you will ne
date you in eversons with a dis
he federal rules
(48) hours prior
-3005 or citycler
F NEWPO
ANDS MA
er, 100 Civic
ty Room (acr
ay, April 23, 2
Managemen
e Henn – Ch
dvisory Pane
da Beimfohr
mshed Dastu
n Lawrenz
bers:
ve Kiff
is Miller
____________
– Welcome a
on agenda an
the Committ
ut do not requ
or shorten t
ment is applie
ilent mode.
March 19, 20
plan. Provide
– A Concept
Lower Cast
and will receiv
Among other
advance of eac
ems not on the a
ments to a reaso
y with the Ameri
eed special ass
ry reasonable msability, as requ
s and regulatio
r to the meeting
rk@newportbea
1
ORT BEA
NAGEME
c Center Driv
ross from the
2014, 4:00 PM
nt Committee
air Nan
el:
Paul
r Jeff
Mich
Shan
_____________
and Introduc
nd non-agend
tee. Speake
uire, you to st
the speakers
ed equally to
14
e comments a
tual Review
taways subco
ve feedback fr
r things, the Br
ch regular mee
agenda but are
onable amount
icans with Disa
sistance beyond
manner. If requeuired by Section
ns adopted in i
g to inform us o
achca.gov.
ACH
ENT COM
ve
e Council Ch
M to 6:00 PM
e – Council M
cy Gardner
l Blank
Herdman
hael Torres
nnon Levin
____________
ctions
da items gen
ers must limit
tate your nam
s’ time limit o
o all speakers
as needed.
ommittee will
rom the Com
rown Act requir
eting and that t
e within the subj
of time, genera
abilities Act (“AD
d what is norm
ested, this agenn 202 of the Am
implementation
of your particula
MMITTEE
hambers)
M
Members:
Ed Se
John
John
_________
nerally consid
t comments
me for the rec
on agenda o
s. As a cour
l review the
mittee and th
res that the Co
the public be a
ject matter juris
ally three (3) m
DA”) in all respe
mally provided, t
nda will be mademericans with D
n thereof. Plea
ar needs and to
AGENDA
elich
Corrough
Keating
dered to be w
to three (3)
cord. The Co
or non-agend
rtesy, please
current statu
e public.
ommittee’s
allowed to
sdiction of
inutes per
ects. If, as
the City of
e available Disabilities
se contact
determine
A
within the
minutes.
ommittee
da items,
turn cell
us of the
2
B. Draft Seawall Policy - Discussion
Staff will present information on the Balboa Island seawall project planning process.
7) ROUNDTABLE OR ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
8) COMMITTEE ANNOUNCEMENTS OR MATTERS WHICH MEMBERS WOULD LIKE PLACED ON A
FUTURE AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION, ACTION OR REPORT (NON-DISCUSSION ITEM)
1. Balboa Island Bulkheads – Update
2. Derelict Vessel Update
3. Mariner’s Mile Walkway
9) DATE AND TIME FOR NEXT MEETING:
June 18, 2014 or as needed.
10) ADJOURNMENT
Tidelands Management Committee
Committee Action Minutes – DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED
Meeting Date: Wednesday, March 19 – 4:00 p.m., Civic Center Community Room
1. The meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Council Member Henn.
2. Roll Call: Council Members: Chair Mike Henn, Nancy Gardner and Ed Selich
Citizen Advisory Members: John Corrough, Jamshed Dastur, Jack
Keating, Jeff Herdman, Don Lawrenz and Paul Blank. Linda Beimfohr
absent.
3. Public Comments on Non-Agenda Items
Harbor Commissioner Dave Girling briefly summarized the Lower Castaway’s project
and requested the item be agendized at the next meeting to provide an in-depth
discussion.
4. Minutes for December 18, 2013. Motion by Council Member Gardner, second by
Council Member Selich. Approved.
5. On-Going Business
A. Re-Cap of Harbor Commission Agenda Action Items during Previous Three
Months.
B. Tidelands Capital Plan
The Committee reviewed the Tidelands Capital Plan and made suggestions for
improvement.
6. Current Business
A. Draft Seawall Policy – Discussion. Staff presented information on the Balboa
Island seawall project planning process, and there was discussion on the various
options concerning the boardwalk, adjoining residential patio elevations and
bulkhead heights. Staff will return at the next meeting with more information.
B. Strategic Planning vs. Tactical Response to Address Rising Ocean Levels.
Citizens Advisory Panel Member Jim Dastur briefly compared the merits of
seawall protection vs. a tidal barrier option for rising ocean levels. A discussion
followed concerning the pros and cons of such a system, and Mr. Dastur
suggested that the Council consider evaluating the criteria for considering such a
project.
7. Roundtable or Additional Public Comments
None.
8. Committee Announcements / Future Agenda Items
Balboa Island Seawall Update
Lower Castaways
Derelict Vessels
Mariner’s Mile Walkway
9. Adjournment around 5:50 PM.
The agenda for March 19, 2014 Regular Meeting was posted on and Wednesday March 14,
2014 at 4:43PM on the Civic Center Electronic Bulletin Board and Binder, and Wednesday
March 14, 2014 at 4:06PM on the City’s website.
______________________________________________
Tidelands Management Committee Chair
Harbor &Fiscal Year Harbor CAP Harbor CAP Tidelands MAINT Tidelands MAINT HAMP Bay ElementEnding Project Fund 240 ‐ Estimate Fund 240 ‐ Actual Fund 230 ‐ Estimate Fund 230 ‐ Actual GOAL GOAL2012 Rhine Channel Dredging 4,235,829 4,069,102 3 8,11,132012 Lower Bay Dredging Phase I 2,500,000 2,779,649 1,2,3 8,11,132012 Linda Isle City/County Dredging‐ 30,730 2012 Harbor Dredging‐ 222 201219th Street Tide Valve Replacement‐ 7,538 1 2012Balboa Island Bulkhead Assessment‐ 188,798 2012Balboa Marina ‐ New Public Dock‐ 31 2012 BYB Mooring Support Service Improvements‐ 3,243 2012 Balboa Yacht Basin (BYB) Facility Improvements‐ 10,417 2012China Cove / Balboa Island Sand Management‐ 19,450 2012Eel Grass Management‐ 6,404 2012Ocean Pier Maintenance‐ 101,075 2012Pearl Avenue South Bay Front Tidal Structures‐ 9,230 2012RGP‐54 Permit‐ 76,135 2012Sediment Clean Up ‐ Rhine Channel /Private Docks‐ 56,676 1 2012 Funding Totals 6,735,829$ 6,879,703$ ‐ 478,996$ 2013 Lower Bay Dredging Phase II 2,300,000 2,419,576 2 1,2,3 8,11,132013 Rhine Channel Dredging‐ 124,531 2013 Balboa Island Bulkhead Assessment 500,000 142,329 2 1,6,9,132013 Balboa Marina ‐ New Public Dock 125,000 1,448 1 1,2 1,2,5,62013 Balboa Yacht Basin (BYB) Facility Improvements 74,585 58,850 1,2 1,2,3,4,62013 Bay Beach Sand Management300,000 34,186 1,3 1,5,6,92013 BYB Mooring Support Service Improvements 25,000 ‐ 1,2 1,5,62013 Eelgrass Survey ‐ Lower Harbor Shoreline 50,000 26,163 2,3 1,2,5,8,92013 Eelgrass Management‐ 29,616 2013 Mooring Field Realignment25,000 ‐ 1,2 1,2,5,62013 Tidegate Retrofit and Upgrades 700,000 147,655 282013 19th Street Tide Valve Replacement‐ 85,453 12013 Vessel Waste Pumpout Station Replacement 20,000 14,935 11,2,3 1,2,6,82013 RGP‐54 Permit‐ 51,171 1 1,2,6,9,132013 Funding Totals 2,300,000$ 2,544,107$ 1,819,585$ 591,805$ Funding Totals 9,035,829$ 9,423,810$ 1,819,585$ 1,070,801$ Notes: 1. Project funding from multiple sources. This amount represents Tidelands funding only.2. Does not include $1.5 million in expenditures for County of Orange portion of dredging work. Funding Source5 YEAR TIDELANDS CAPITAL PLANUpdated April 16, 2014Page 1 of 3
Harbor &Fiscal Year Harbor CAP Harbor CAP Tidelands MAINTTidelands MAINTHAMP Bay ElementEnding Project Fund 240 ‐ Estimate Fund 240 ‐ Actual Fund 230 ‐ Estimate Fund 230 ‐ Actual GOAL GOAL201419th Street Tide Valve Replacement7,000 302014Harbor Bulkhead Maintenance446,900 3181,750 2 1,6,9,132014Balboa Marina ‐ New Public Dock 125,000 377,000 2014Bay Beach Sand Management364,600 3216,500 2014BYB Mooring Support Service Improvements 25,000 325,000 2014Dory Fleet Facility Rehabilitation 50,000 50,000 2014Eelgrass Management1,500 31,500 2014Eelgrass Survey ‐ Deep Channel25,000 02014Eelgrass Survey ‐ Lower Harbor Shoreline 23,400 323,400 2014Harbor Piers Maintenance400,000 10,600 2014Mooring Field Realignment100,000 302014Ocean Piers Maintenance600,000 100,000 2014RGP‐54 Permit494,200 3466,020 1 1,2,6,9,132014Tidegate Retrofit and Upgrades 640,000 313,000 2014Vessel Waste Pumpout Station Replacement 5,000 302014 Funding Totals 125,000$ ‐$ 3,182,600$ 1,164,770$ 2015Semeniuk Slough Dredging (15K‐20K CY) 2,000,000 3 2,82015Newport Pier Concession Bldg (Replacement) 1,200,000 2015Balboa Island Bulkhead Replacement (Design)650,000 2 1,6,9,132015Central Avenue Public Pier 400,000 20152015 Tidelands Maintenance Projects2,156,830 2015 Funding Totals 1,050,000$ ‐$ 5,356,830$ ‐$ 2016Balboa Island Bulkhead Replacement (Constr.) 20,000,000 2016Ocean Piers Maintenance500,000 20162016 Tidelands Maintenance Projects 1,000,000 2016 Funding Totals 20,000,000$ ‐$ 1,500,000$ ‐$ 2017Grand Canal Dredging 500,000 1,2 1,2,5,6,9,1320172017 Tidelands Maintenance Projects 1,500,000 2017 Funding Totals 500,000$ ‐$ 1,500,000$ ‐$ 2018Ocean Piers Maintenance500,000 2018Lower Castaways Development CEQA / Design 800,000 1,2 1,2,5,6,9,1320182018 Tidelands Maintenance Projects 700,000 2018 Funding Totals‐$ ‐$ 2,000,000$ ‐$ FIVE YEAR FUNDING TOTAL 21,675,000$ ‐$ 13,539,430$ 1,164,770$ Notes: 3. Includes carryovers and unspent encumbrances from prior fiscal year.5 YEAR TIDELANDS CAPITAL PLAN Funding SourcePage 2 of 3
Tidelands Capital PlanList of Future Projects Not Included in 5 Year PlanTIDELANDS PROJECTSAFTER 5 YEARSHarbor &Est. Project Harbor Tidelands Tidelands HAMP Bay ElementStart FY Project CAP Fund MAINT Fund MAINT Fund GOAL GOAL2017 Balboa Island Seawall Replacement TBD1,2 1,6,9,132017 Potential American Legion Seawall Repairs (TBD) TBD2020 Future Lower Bay Dredging /Ongoing Maintenance TBD1,2 8,11,132020 Lower Castaways Development TBD1 1,2,3,5,6,92021 West Newport Channel DredgingTBD1,2,3 8,11,132021 Mariner's Mile Walkway TBD2030 Future Upper Bay DredgingTBD2,3 7,8TIDELANDS PROGRAMSHarbor &Est. Project Harbor Tidelands Tidelands HAMP Bay ElementStart FY Project CAP Fund MAINT Fund MAINT Fund GOAL GOALOngoing Water Quality TBD3 7,8Ongoing Habitat Restoration TBD3 7,8 Funding Source Funding SourcePage 3 of 3
Balboa Islands Seawall Replacement Project
Tidelands Management Committee
March 19, 2014
Commentary by Jamshed Dastur (Citizens Advisory Panel)
The 44 page PowerPoint presentation by City Staff was extremely useful in getting my arms
around this multi‐faceted issue. It clearly addresses various competing options and design
parameters to be considered in finalizing the project(s) for execution.
One of the considerations in finalizing the top elevation of the new wall (suggested EL 10.00
MLLW) is the desire to have Balboa Island removed from FEMA’s designation as a flood plain.
This would unburden some of the home owners (those with outstanding mortgages on their
homes) from paying for mandatory flood insurance. After some deliberation, I have come to the
conclusion that this consideration should be eliminated. For Balboa Island to be removed from
consideration as a flood plain, all of the construction – (proposed phases 1, 2 & 3) – currently
estimated to cost $57,000,000 would have to be in place before any relief from flood insurance
would begin to accrue. My guess is that you are looking at close to 2020, for that to happen. By
then, the ocean level would have risen some more and FEMA could easily revise their
requirements accordingly. Even if relief from flood insurance were available in 2020, it would
be short‐lived as the sea level is expected to rise by 5” by 2025. In short, there may be other
reasons to establish EL 10:00 MLLW as the top of new walls, but not the FEMA consideration.
At the March 19, 2014 meeting, in response to a question, it was stated that the projected sea
level rise used for this analysis (0.40 ft. in 2025, 1.38 ft. in 2050 and 4.6 ft. in 2100) was the
higher end of the projections. However, in going back and reviewing the hand outs at the
December 18, 2013 meeting, the following data is noted. Page 5 of the California Coastal
Commission Draft Sea‐Level Rise Policy Guidance, Table 1, gives the Sea Level Rise Projections
for California South of Cape Mendocino. They show the upper end to be 0.98 ft. in 2030, 2 ft. in
2050 and 5.48’ in 2100 – in other words, higher than is being currently considered. I understand
that the projections give a range, but we should be clear as to what data we are using and why.
A recent report by UCI scientists (Orange County Register – 3/28/2014 – “Glacier melt could
soak Newport”) seems to indicate that the sea level may be rising even faster than current
predictions.
For decision making purposes, I see two distinct end goals for Balboa Island– (a) Replace
structurally deteriorated walls, (b) raise walls to avert flooding in the short run. The issue of
flooding in the long run needs to be reviewed holistically for the entire Newport Beach harbor
and not solely for Balboa Island. This is where the viability of a Tide Gate needs to be studied.
Without question, the walls of the Grand Canal and the West End need to be replaced in the
near future. However, in my opinion, a very small portion of the wall length designated for
replacement under Phase 2 (and estimated to cost $30,200,000) actually needs to be replaced.
Most of it is just a “containment wall” and not a “retaining wall” and is good for another 25+
years with minimum routine maintenance. However, the wall length currently designated as
Phase 2 & Phase 3 needs to be immediately raised to a minimum EL 9.00 MLLW. The City’s own
earlier studies indicate that 83.6% of parcels and 16.6% of buildings would be impacted by 2025
(just around the corner) in a scenario of 10% exceedance probability and a higher number of
parcels and buildings, for a 1% probability. In fact, due to its low cost (I estimate a cost of less
than $2,000,000 for a height limit of EL 9.00 MLLW) and quick construction time (one year or
so) these two phases should be immediately implemented, particularly to limit the City’s
liability.
I do not see the raising of the boardwalk as a necessity, particularly if the top of wall elevation is
limited to EL 9.00 MLLW. At some date in the future, if the Tide gate plan is not embraced, all of
the utilities will need to be raised, at which time all of the boardwalks would be raised.
I remain convinced that a preliminary study to investigate the viability, effectiveness and cost of
a Tide Gate (my estimate of such a study is in the range of $150,000 to $200,000 depending on
the scope) would be money well spent. Raising sea walls, to some extent, will make‐do in the
short term, and then what? We are currently concerned about the various negative impacts of
raising the walls to EL10.00 MLLW. Can you imagine the walls at EL12.00 MLLW or even higher?
Jamshed Dastur
April 4, 2014