Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout13 - Public Safety Realignment and the CA Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC)Q SEW Pp�T CITY OF s NEWPORT BEACH cg4IF09 City Council Staff Report May 23, 2017 Agenda Item No. 13 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Police Department Jon T. Lewis, Chief of Police 949-644-3701, jlewis@nbpd.org PREPARED BY: Steve Rasmussen, Detective Lieutenant 949-644-3778, srasmussen@nbpd.org TITLE: Acceptance of Funds from Public Safety Realignment and the California Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) ABSTRACT: The Police Department requests City Council approval to accept funds from Public Safety Realignment (AB 109) as well as Local Assistance law enforcement funds from the California Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC), so that the City can receive $11,554.64 and $57,088.09, respectively, in state funds and allocate these funds to front-line law enforcement services. RECOMMENDATION: a) Determine that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly; b) Accept AB 109 funds in the amount of $11,554.64 for front-line law enforcement services that were received and will post as Fiscal Year 2017-2018 revenues in Police Revenue account 01035352-431465 by increasing expenditure appropriations for Fiscal Year 2017-2018 in Patrol Overtime Safety and Half -Time account 01035353-713002; c) Accept BSCC funds in the amount of $57,088.09 for front-line law enforcement services that were received and will post as Fiscal Year 2017-2018 revenues in Police Revenue account 01035352-431465 by increasing expenditure appropriations for Fiscal Year 2017-2018 in Patrol Special Department Supplies BSCC account 01035353-841015-G1703 ($21,000.00) and Patrol Overtime Safety and Half -Time account 01035353-713002 ($36,088.09); and 13-1 Acceptance of Funds from Public Safety Realignment and BSCC May 23, 2017 Page 2 d) Authorize the City Manager to execute a budget amendment on July 1, 2017, to accept AB 109 and BSCC funds, increase revenue estimates by $68,642.73 in Police Revenue account 01035352-431465, and increase expenditure appropriations by $47,642.73 in Patrol Overtime account 01035353-713002 and $21,000.00 in Patrol Special Department Supplies BSCC account 01035353- 841015-G1703. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: This Budget Amendment records and appropriates $68,642.73 in additional revenue from AB 109 and BSCC funds and $68,642.73 in increased expenditure appropriations. There are no matching fund requirements to accept these funds. DISCUSSION: Public Safety Realignment AB 109 was implemented in the County of Orange in FY 2011-2012 and designated funding was disbursed based on claims or invoices submitted for reimbursement. This required each participating local law enforcement entity to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the OC Probation Department to provide agreed upon services and submit invoices for reimbursement. In late FY 2015-2016, the County of Orange received clarification from the State of California permitting AB 109 funds to be disbursed as an allocation emphasizing that the funds are to be used for public safety and not to supplant other revenues. To implement this change with respect to the local law enforcement agencies, the MOUs had to expire, and approvals were needed from both the Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Committee as well as the Orange County Board of Supervisors. At the Orange County Board of Supervisors meeting on November 22, 2016, the final approval was received. California Board of State and Community Corrections Legislation associated with the California 2011 Budget Act established the BSCC as an independent entity effective July 1, 2012. The BSCC assumed the previous functions of the Corrections Standards Authority as well as other public safety programs previously administered by the California Emergency Management Agency. Due to the steady erosion of funding for city police agencies over the last several years, local communities have experienced significant public safety impacts. To help mitigate these reductions, funds were appropriated to create a new grant program for city police departments. This funding recognizes the need for city law enforcement to be able to provide front-line services based upon their own regional needs. Authorized uses include supplementing: 13-2 Acceptance of Funds from Public Safety Realignment and BSCC May 23, 2017 Page 3 1. Homeless outreach teams 2. Crisis Intervention Training for officers 3. Gang Resistance Education and Training (GREAT) 4. Resources for drug -endangered children 5. Outreach to high-risk youth 6. Youth diversion programs 7. Gang and violence prevention programs Public Safety Realignment Beginning with FY 2016-2017, allocations received will be distributed proportionately based upon the budget submitted and approved by the CCP Committee; funds are received two months in arrears. Tentatively, disbursements are planned as follows: Applicable Period $ Received by County Est. Disbursement Date July to September (Quarter 1) September — November December 31 October to December (Quarter 2) December — February March 31 January to March (Quarter 3) March — May June 30 April to June (Quarter 4) June — August September 30 For some entities, including the Newport Beach Police Department, the amount awarded in prior years was not fully expended. These amounts were reconciled and will follow this new methodology with all prior years' funds being disbursed by December 31, 2016. The Newport Beach Police Department received $827.94 for the Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Quarter 1 Allocation and $10,726.70 for the Prior Year's Unspent Allocation for a total of $11,554.64. Although the funds are being disbursed as an allocation, they are still required to be used for public safety and not for supplanting any other funding. At the end of each fiscal year, each entity receiving AB 109 funds is required to certify as such. California Board of State and Community Corrections As part of the 2012 Budget Act, $24 million for Local Assistance was appropriated for city police departments, with the allocation formula to be developed by the BSCC in consultation with the Department of Finance. The California Police Chiefs Association, on behalf of local law enforcement agencies, presented to the BSCC an allocation formula based upon regional needs in each county. The BSCC recognized the importance of local agencies being able to best identify their own needs with regards to the use of resources and approved the formula. In 2016, Orange County agencies were allocated a total of approximately $1.27 million and the City of Garden Grove was again identified as the fiduciary agent for Orange County regarding this funding. Per the collective decision of county law enforcement executives, the City of Garden Grove distributed a 2016 allocation of $57,088.09 to the Newport Beach Police Department. 13-3 Acceptance of Funds from Public Safety Realignment and BSCC May 23, 2017 Page 4 Utilization: Public Safety Realignment The Newport Beach Police Department will utilize AB 109 funds ($11,554.64) to supplement our existing Crime Suppression Unit's efforts to conduct probation sweeps through additional resources paid for with overtime. California Board of State and Community Corrections The Newport Beach Police Department will utilize BSCC funds ($57,088.09) for the following purposes: 1. To supplement our first responder first-aid program with training and equipment designed to improve the police department's life-saving efforts, such as purchasing and issuing police officers Naloxone (also known as Narcan TM which treats opioid -related overdoses on -scene 2. To supplement and expedite our training efforts in regards to Crisis Intervention/Mental Health for all police officers 3. To supplement our existing Homeless Liaison Officer program through additional resources paid for with overtime 4. Any other purpose as stipulated in Provision 2 of Item 5227-102-0001 of the Budget Act of 2016 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff recommends the City Council find this action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. NOTICING: The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item). ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — AB 109 Funding Distribution Attachment B — BSCC Funding Distribution 13-4 ATTACHMENT A Rasmussen, Steve From: Newman, Lisa Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 10:49 AM To: Rasmussen, Steve Subject: FW: Notification of Public Safety Realignment Funding Disbursements (AB109) Attachments: image001.png; image001.png Here you go.... From: Lewis, Jon Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 1:55 PM To: PD COMMAND STAFF; Newman, Lisa Subject: Fwd: Notification of Public Safety Realignment Funding Disbursements (AB109) FYI Jon T. Lewis Chief of Police Newport Beach Police Department (949) 644-3701 Begin forwarded message: From: "Engelby, Kimberly" <Kimberly.Engel by@ocgov.com> Date: December 16, 2016 at 13:07:53 PST To: "jlewis@nbpd.org" <jlewis@nbpd.org> Cc: "nbpdchief@nbpd.org" <nbpdchief@nbpd.org> Subject: FW: Notification of Public Safety Realignment Funding Disbursements (AB109) As notified in the email below, the County of Orange has made some significant changes with regards to the disbursing of Public Safety Realignment Funds allocated to the Local Law Enforcement entities. With this change, unspent amounts from prior year's allocations are being disbursed along with the first quarter receipts for FY 2016/17 and are to be treated as an allocation from the County dedicated to Public Safety. Below are the amounts determined for your entity with a check to be issued within the next three weeks. Prior Year's Unspent Allocation $10,726.70 FY 16/17 Quarter 1 Allocation $827.94 Total $11,554.64 As a reminder, the funds received are to be used for public safety expenditures only and a certification will be required at the end of the fiscal year. Please contact me should you have any questions or concerns. Also, if you have anyone I should add as a contact, please let me know. Thank you. 13-5 Kim Engelby Public Protection & Community Services Team Lead County Executive Office I Budget Hall of Administration 333 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Room 316 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Office: (714) 834-7487 Fax: (714) 834-6658 Kimberly. Engelby(cbocgov.com From: Engelby, Kimberly Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 2:07 PM To: 'rquezada@anaheim.net'; 'Johnc@ci.brea.ca.us'; 'csianez@bppd.com'; 'rsharpnack@costamesaca.gov'; 'rcox@cypressca.org'; 'ch iefofpolice @cypressca.org'; 'dan.Ilorens@fountainvalley.org'; 'jsiko@fullertonpd.org'; 'todde@ci.garden-grove.ca.us'; 'robert.handy@hbpd.org'; 'mhamel@ci.irvine.ca.us'; 'iprice@lahabraca.gov'; Immccrary@cityoflapalma.org'; 'police@cityoflapalma.org';'Ifarinellla@lagunabeachcity.net'; 'enunez@cityoflosalamitos.org'; 'ilewis@nbpd.org'; 'nbpdchief@nbpd.org'; 'tkisela@orangepd.org'; 'dlenyi@placentia.org'; 'croias@santa-ana.org'; 'jstilinovich@sealbeachca.gov'; 'ccelano@tustinca.org'; 'rcamaos@wesminster-ca.e-ov' Cc: Sentman, Steven J.; Schultz, Dana; Bohan -Johnston, Lisa; Aguirre, Michelle; Cosma, Oana; Phillips, Wendy; Olgren-Potter, Kim Subject: Notification of Public Safety Realignment Funding Disbursements (AB109) Importance: High Please see the notification below regarding immediate changes with the distribution of AB109 funds. Background: Public Safety Realignment (AB109) was implemented in the County of Orange in FY 2011/12 and designated funding was disbursed based on claims or invoices submitted for reimbursement. This required each participating local law enforcement entity to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the OC Probation Department to provide agreed upon services and submit invoices for reimbursement. In late FY 2015/16, the County received clarification from the State permitting Public Safety Realignment funds to be disbursed as an allocation emphasizing that the funds are to be used for public safety and not supplant other revenues. To implement this change with respect to the local law enforcement agencies, the MOU's had to expire and approvals were needed from both the Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Committee as well as the Orange County Board of Supervisors. At yesterday's Board of Supervisors meeting, the final approval was received. NEW Process: Beginning with this fiscal year, FY 2016/17, allocations received will be distributed proportionately based upon the budget submitted and approved by the CCP Committee (attached for reference). As a reminder, funds are received two months in arrears. Tentatively, disbursements are planned as follows: 13-6 Applicable Period $ Received by County Est Disbursement Date Jul to Sept (Qtr 1) Sep - Nov December 31 Oct to Dec Qtr 2 Dec - Feb March 31 Jan to Mar (Qtr 3) Mar - May June 30 Apr to Jun (Qtr 4) Jun - Aug September 30 For some entities, the amount awarded in prior years has not been fully expended. These amounts are in the process of being reconciled and will follow this new methodology with all prior year's funds being disbursed by December 31, 2016. Once the amounts are verified, each entity will be notified. In addition, the CCP fiscal coordination duties have transitioned to the CEO Budget Unit and I will be your main point of contact until you hear otherwise. My contact information is shown below. Certification and Agency Contact: Although the funds are being disbursed as an allocation, there are still requirements it be used for public safety and not supplanting any other funding. At the end of each fiscal year, each entity receiving AB 109 Public Safety funds will be required to certify as such. Also, specific information from your agency may be requested to assist with the development of the required AB109 Annual Report, please let me know your agency's contact for data related to the use of these funds. This is the same information provided at the Chief of Police Meeting held earlier this month at the Santa Ana Police Department. I am available should you have any questions or concerns. Thank you. Kim Engelby Public Protection & Community Services Team Lead County Executive Office I Budget Hall of Administration 333 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Room 316 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Office: (714) 834-7487 Fax: (714) 834-6658 Kim berlV.Engel bV(o-)ocgov.com 13-7 ATTACHMENT B 4CFrr� CITY OF GARDEN GROVE GARDEN GROVE POLICE DEPARTMENT A NATIONALLY ACCREDITED LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY March 2, 2017 Chief Jon Lewis Newport Beach Police Department 870 Santa Barbara Dr. Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dear Chief Lewis, TODD D. ELGIN CHIEF OF POLICE Enclosed is your agency's portion of 2016 Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) Local Assistance funding. This allocation is not the same as AB109 funds your agency may receive from the County (formerly through OC Probation); BSCC funds are distributed as a lump sum "up front" payment to your agency from the State, through the City of Garden Grove as fiscal agent. Since FY 2012-13, the City of Garden Grove has acted as the fiscal agent for local disbursement of Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) local funding. The Budget Act of 2016 allocates $20 million "to cities to increase positive outcomes between municipal law enforcement and high-risk populations." Orange County's share is approximately $1.27 million. The 2016 legislation authorizing this allocation is significantly different than in years past; mandator minimum funding and reporting requirements were added, and the focus shifted from AB109-related issues to at -risk populations, such as the m_Qntally ill and homeless. Your agency s ou ave a rea y u i ed its reporting requirements as the deadline was February 28, 2017. We have not been informed of any further reporting requirements for FY 2016-17 but will notify your agency of any changes. Should you have any questions regarding this funding or enclosed documents, please contact Courtney Allison, Police Fiscal Analyst at (714) 741-5819 or courta@ci.garden- grove.ca.us. Sincerely, Udo Todd D. Elgin Chief of Police RECEIVED MAR as Enclosures 11301 Acacia Parkway P.O.Box 3070 Garden Grove, CA 92842 714.741.5704 http://www.ci.garden-grove.ca.us/departments/police 13-8 CITY OF GARDEN GROVE: DATE ACCOUNT CODE PURCHASE ORDER NO. VENDOR INVOICE NO. NET AMOUNT 022817 942 22390 BSCC FUNDING DISTR FY16-17 57,088.09 022817 TOTAL 57,088.09 0( 0 SUPEWOR PRESS (888) 540.7998 JB3168506 DETACH BEFORE DEPOSIT THE RED THERMO SECURED "SF" LOGO IN THE LOWER CORNER OF THIS CHECK MUST FADETEMPORARILY WHEN WARMED BY TOUCH OR FRICTION. SEE BACK FOR ADDITIONAL FEATURES. CITY OF to UnionBank VOID IF NOT CASHED IN 6O DAYS NO. 618966 Payable of ony Union Bank branch including 16-49/1220 GARDEN GROVE 40OColilarniaSt.,SonFrancis ,CA94IG4 20d2850020 CALIFORNIA 18001238,4486 unionbank.com DATE 02/28/17 A11+I1UN;**$57,088,09 PAY TO THE ORDER OF pp c7/ ��++ / yp %9ay �xacElr� --;"/t even..Jhaudarld (fiy4ly Giyk and 09/100 20A.P9 NEWPORT PD 870 SANTA BARBARA DR NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 T° geE oiRccTaR TREASURER 13-9 ENDORSEMENT AREA: Know Your Endorser. Require Identification. DO NOT WRITE, STAMP OR SIGN BELOW THIS LINE RESERVED FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION USE FTHIS DOCUMENT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING SECURITY 4 FEATURES: EXCEEDING FSA GUIDELINES: RED SUPERIOR PROTECTION -SP-LOGOATBOTTOM RIGHT OF CHECK MUST FADE TEMPORARILY WHEN WARMED. TWO-COLOR SAFETY PATTERN ON FACE MUST CHANGE COLOR EVENLY FROM TOP TO BOTTOM. MICRO PRINTING IN CHECK BORDER AND IN ENDORSEMENT LINES (ABOVE) CAN BE READ WITH MAGNIFIER BUT APPEAR AS DOTS ON PHOTOCOPIES. SECURITY SCREEN ABSENCE OF -ORIGINAL DOCUMENT" VERBIAGE ON BACK OF CHECK. PAPER CONTAINS INVISIBLE FIBERS FACE AND BACK WHICH FLUORESCE UNDER ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT. PAPER CONTAINS CHEMICAL ALTERATION INDICATOR. TONERFUSE� 11 -REVEALS ATTEMPTED TAPE -LIFTING OR SCRAPING. STATEQF CALIFORNIA BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS LINDAM, PENNER 2596VENTurrOAKS WAY. SUITE 200 + SACRAMENTO CA 95833 - 546445.5073 - BSCCCAGGV Cruir KATHLEEN T. H©1VARD rxec;&Vvr*V maor December 8, 2016 Dear Fiscal Agent for City Law Enforcement Grants: 14D BOMUNO G. SROWN, JR. C-Owra r The Budget Act of 2016, Chapter 23, Statutes of 2016, allocates $20 million to cities to increase positive outcomes between municipal law enforcement and high-risk populations. The State Controller's Office is authorized to disburse these funds according to a schedule provided by the Department of Finance. As stipulated in Provision 1 of Item 5227-102-0001 of the Budget Act of 2016, the fiscal year 2016-17 awards were determined based on a combination of factors, including the size of police departments in each county and mental health and homeless population data (Attachment 1). Consistent with historical practice for this grant, your city is the fiscal agent for local disbursement. Disbursement of these funds shall be the collective decision of the city police departments within your county. Provision 1 of Item 5227-102-0001 of the Budget Act of 2016 requires that a minimum of 60 percent of the total funding must go to police departments employing 100 or fewer officers. The allocation table (Attachment 1) includes additional information about the minimum percentage, and corresponding dollar amount, of each county's total allocation that must be distributed to small departments to meet that requirement on a statewide level. Also attached (Attachment II) is a document showing both the small and large police departments in each county along with the number of sworn officers in each department. This document is intended to be helpful for each fiduciary agent and city police departments to use as a reference guide when making funding disbursement decisions. Provision 2 states, "Local law enforcement agencies may use the funds to supplement, not supplant, the following: (a) Homeless outreach teams. (b) Crisis Intervention Training for officers. (c) Gang Resistance Education and Training (GREAT)_ (d) Resources for drug endangered children. (e) Outreach to high-risk youth, (f) Youth diversion programs. (g) Gang and violence prevention programs." Finally, Provision 3 requires agencies that receive funding to report the following, as applicable: (a) The number of new teams established, or planned to be established. (b) The type of training and the number of peace officers trained, or planned to be trained. (c) The type of equipment or resources that were purchased, or planned to be purchased Attached is a document for each city police department to complete to notify the fiscal agent of its agreement to submit the data required to receive this funding (Attachment III). The fiscal agent for each county must complete and return the document to the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) by January 27, 2017. 13-11 The BSCC is developing a website that will allow each city police department that accepts this funding to submit the required data electronically. Instructions and log -in information will be sent after BSCC's receipt of Attachment III. Each city police department shall submit the data by February 28, 2017. The BSCC will then make this information available to the Legislature by April 1, 2017. If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this funding or the reporting requirement, please contact Adam Lwin at (916) 324-2626 or Adam.Lwin@bscc.ca.gov . Sincerely, LINDA PENNER Chair Board of State and Community Corrections Attachments cc: Ms. Amy Jarvis, Assistant Program Budget Manger, Department of Finance Ms. Leslie McGill, Executive Director, California Police Chiefs Association Ms. Lauren Michaels, Legislative Affairs Manager, California Police Chiefs Association 13-12 City Law Enforcement Grant 2016-17 Allocation Attachment I County City Named as Fiduciary Agent Total Allocation by County Minimum Percentage of Minimum Allocation Total Allocation for Small for Small Departments Departments Maximum Allocation for Large Departments Alameda County Fremont $ 950,347 61.84% $ 587,687 $ 362,650_ Amador County Jackson $ 16,434 100.00% $ 16,434 $ - Butte County Chico $ 123,636 100.00% $ 123,636 $ Calaveras County Angels Camp $ 11,446 100.00% $ 11,446 $ Colusa County Williams $ 16,215 100.00%p $ 16,215 $ - Contra Costa County Concord $ 677,497 78.15% $ 529,451 $ 148,046 Del Norte County Crescent City $ 8,742 100.00% $ 8,742 $ - EI Dorado County South Lake Tahoe $ 55,119 100.00% S 55,119 $ - Fresno County Fresno $ 460,328 54.25% $ 249,731 $ 210,588 Glenn County Orland $ _ 16,597 100.00% $ 16,597 $ - Humboldt County Arcata $ 104,598 100.00% $ 104,598 $ Imperial County Brawley $ 113,220 100.00% $ 113,220 S - Inyo County Bishop $ 10,309 100.00% $ 10,309 S - Kern County Bakersfield $ 342,075 63.62% S 217,642 S 124,433 Kings County Hanford $ 90,505 100.00°/ $ 90,505 $ - Lake County Lakeport $ 33,661 100.00% $ 33,661 S - Lassen County 5usanville $ 13,725 100.00% S 13,725 $ - Los Angeles County Gardena $ 6,288,490 48.16% $ 3,028,692 S 3,259,798 Madera County Madera $ 62,116 100.00% $ 62,116 $ - Marin County San Rafael $ 202,872 100.00% $ 202,872 S - Mendocino County Ukiah $ 68,634 100.00% $ 68,634 S - Merced County Los Banos $ 159,563 100.00% $ 159,563 S - Modoc County Alturas $ 5,690 100.00% $ 5,690 $ - Mono County Mammoth Lakes $ 7,892 100.00% $ 7,892 $ - Monterey County Marina $ 331,948 71.19% $ 236,324 S 95,624 Napa County Napa $ 74,535 100.00% $ 74,535 $ - Nevada County Grass Valley $ 44,112 100.00% $ 44,112 S - Orange County Garden Grove $ 1,276,046 59.70% $ 761,755 $ 514,291 Placer County Auburn $ 159,720 66.58% $ 106,976 $ 52,744 Riverside County Corona $ 768,863 67.62% S 519,888 $ 248,974 Sacramento County Citrus Heights $ 568,225 55.45% $ 315,087 S 253,138 San Benito County Hollister $ 30,587 100.00% $ 30,587 $ - San Bernardino County Fontana S 670,594 58.39% S 391,536 S 279,058 San Diego County San Diego S 1,417,836 48.44% $ 686,848 $ 730,989 San Francisco County San Francisco $ 500,886 0.00% $ - $ 500,886 San Joaquin County Stockton S 386,585 66.39%n S 256;652 S 129,934 San Luis Obispo County San Luis Obispo S 182,335 100.00% S 182,335 $ - San Mateo County Daly City S 512,971 80.91% S 415,068 $ 97,903 Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara S 210.572 55.47% S 116,806 $ 93,767 Santa Clara County Los Gatos $ 1,016,469 59.58% $ 605,628 $ 410,841 Santa Cruz County Watsonville $ 196,957 100.00% $ 196,957 $ - Shasta County Redding $ 96,425 100.00% $ 96,425 S - Siskiyou County Yreka $ 30,434 100.00% $ 30,434 S - Solano County Vallejo $ 253,160 68.96% $ 174,591 S 78,569 Sonoma County Santa Rosa $ 347,275 67.36% $ 233,912 S 113,363 Stanislaus County Ceres $ 272,475 66.88% $ 1.82,221 $ 90,254 Sutter Canty_Yuba City $ 51,855 100.00% $ 51,855 $ - Tehama Count Red Bluff $ 31,793 100.00% $ 31,793 $ - Tulare Coun!y Visalia S 246,178 76.29% $ 187,818 $ 58,360 Tuolumne County Sonora $ 16,062 100.00% $ 16,062 $ - Ventura County Ventura $ 283,283 48.54% $ 137,503 $ 145,780 Yolo County West Sacramento 1 $ 153,296 1 100.00% $ 153,296 $ - Yuba County Wheatland $ 28,810 1 100.00% $ 28,810 S - Total $ 20,000,000 1 $ 12,000,000 1 $ 8,000,000 13-13 City Law Enforcement Grant . 2016-17 Attachment II County Large Departments Number of Sworn Officers Small Departments Number of Sworn Officers ALAMEDA COUNTY BERKELEY PD 165 ALAMEDA PD 78 FREMONT PD 182 ALBANY PD 23 HAYWARD PD 188 EMERYVILLE PD 37 OAKLAND PD 753 LIVERMORE PD 89 MORAGA PD 12 NEWARK PD 55 PIEDMONT PD 19 PLEASANTON PD 79 SAN LEANDRO PD 91 UNION CITY PD 74 AMADOR COUNTY IONE PD 6 JACKSON PD 7 SUTTER CREEK PD 4 BUTTE COUNTY CHICO PD 84 GRIDLEY PD 14 OROVILLE PD 26 PARADISE PD 18 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP PD 7 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA PD 9 WILLIAMS PD 12 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONCORD PD 151 ANTIOCH PD 93 RICHMOND PD 170 BRENTWOOD PD 62 CLAYTON PD 10 EL CERRITO PD 38 HERCULES PD 20 KENSINGTON PD 10 MARTINEZ PD 34 OAKLEY PD 28 PINOLE PD 22 PITTSBURG PD 79 PLEASANT HILL PD 39 SAN PABLO PD 48 SAN RAMON PD 64 WALNUT CREEK PD 82 DEL NORTE COUNTY CRESCENT CITY PD 8 EL DORADO -COUNTY' - -- — - - ---- - - --- _ -- - - --- PLACERVILLE PD 19 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE PD 34 FRESNO COUNTY CLOVIS PD 101 COALINGA PD 19 FRESNO PD 733 FIREBAUGH PD 11 FOWLER PD 12 HURON PD 6 KERMAN PD 19 KINGSBURG PD 12 MENDOTA PD 12 ORANGE COVE PD 11 PARLIER PD 12 REEDLEY PD 27 SANGER PD 30 SELMA PD 33 13-14 City Law Enforcement Grant 2016-17 Attachment II County Large Departments Number of Sworn Officers Small Departments Number of Sworn Officers GLENN COUNTY ORLAND PD 11 WILLOWS PD 9 HUMBOLDT COUNTY ARCATA PD 23 EUREKA PD 49 FERNDALE PD 6 FORTUNA PD 16 RIO DELL PD 3 IMPERIAL COUNTY BRAWLEY PD 35 CALEXICO PD 26 CALIPATRIA PD 5 EL CENTRO PD 48 IMPERIAL PD 17 WESTMORLAND PD 5 INYO COUNTY BISHOP PD 13 KERN COUNTY BAKERSFIELD PD 380 ARVIN PD 18 BEAR VALLEY PD 6 CALIFORNIA CITY PD 19 DELANO PD 51 MCFARLAND PD 14 RIDGECREST PD 32 SHAFTER PD 23 STALLION SPRINGS PD 2 TAFT PD 17 TEHACHAPI PD 15 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL PD 16 CORCORAN PD 17 HANFORD PD 54 LEMOORE PD 31 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE PD 22 LAKEPORT PD 9 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE PD 15 LOS ANGELES COUNTY BEVERLY HILLS PD 116 ALHAMBRA PD 82 BURBANK PD 140 ARCADIA PD 63 CULVER CITY PD 101 AZUSA PD 58 DOWNEY PD 107 BALDWIN PARK PD 66 EL MONTE PD 110 BELL GARDENS PD 50 GLENDALE PD 231 BELL PD 29 INGLEWOOD PD 171 CLAREMONT PD 39 LONG BEACH PD 783 COVINA PD 56 LOS ANGELES PD 9,753 EL SEGUNDO PD 54 PASADENA PD 216 GARDENA PD 95 POMONA PD 159 GLENDORA PD 51 SANTA MONICA PD 204 HAWTHORNE PD 89 TORRANCE PD 204 HERMOSA BEACH PD 37 WHITTIER PD 119 HUNTINGTON PARK PD 56 IRWINDALE PD 27 LA VERNE PD 39 MANHATTAN BEACH PD 68 MONROVIA PD 47 MONTEBELLO PD 68 MONTEREY PARK PD 68 13-15 City Law Enforcement Grant 2016-17 Attachment II County Large Departments Number of Sworn Officers Small Departments Number of Sworn Officers PALOS VERDES ESTATEc 24 REDONDO BEACH PD 81 SAN FERNANDO PD 24 SAN GABRIEL PD 49 SAN MARINO PD 26 SIERRA MADRE PD 9 SIGNAL HILL PD -35 SOUTH GATE PD 73 SOUTH PASADENA PD 33 VERNON PD 38 WEST COVINA PD 89 MADERA COUNTY CHOWCHILLA PD 14 MADERA PD 54 MARIN COUNTY , BELVEDERE PD 6 CENTRAL MARIN POLICE 44 FAIRFAX PD 11 MILL VALLEY PD 20 NOVATO PD 54 ROSS PD 8 SAN RAFAEL PD 65 SAUSALITO PD 16 TIBURON PD 13 MENDOCINO COUNTY FORT BRAGG PD 15 UKIAH PD 30 WILLITS PD 11 MERCED COUNTY ATWATER PD-' 29 DOS PALOS PD 7 GUSTINE PD 8 LIVINGSTON PD 17 LOS BANOS PD 39 MERCED PD 80 MODOC COUNTY ALTURAS PD 7 MONO COUNTY MAMMOTH LAKES PD 10 MONTEREY COUNTY SALINAS PD 134 CARMEL PD 15 DEL REY OAKS PD 5 - - --�-- GON7AL-ES-PD-------- 8 GREENFIELD PD 17 KING CITY PD 13 MARINA PD 29 MONTEREY PD 46 PACIFIC GROVE PD 16 SAND CITY PD 9 SEASIDE PD 36 SOLEDAD PD 16 NAPA COUNTY CALISTOGA PD 8 NAPA PD 71 SAINT HELENA PD 11 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY PD 21 NEVADA CITY PD 9 TRUCKEE PD 21 13-16 City Law Enforcement Grant 2016-17 Attachment 11 County Large Departments Number of Sworn Officers Small Departments Number of Sworn Officers ORANGE COUNTY ANAHEIM PD 387 COSTA MESA PD 111 BREA PD 60 FULLERTON PD 140 BUENA PARK PD 80 GARDEN GROVE PD 156 CYPRESS PD 51 HUNTINGTON BEACH PD 214 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PD 61 IRVINE PD 210 LA HABRA PD 68 NEWPORT BEACH PD 138 LA PALMA PD 18 ORANGE PD 144 LAGUNA BEACH PD 47 SANTA ANA PD 291 LOS ALAMITOS PD 23 PLACENTIA PD 47 SEAL BEACH PD 33 TUSTIN PD 88 WESTMINSTER PD 87 PLACER COUNTY ROSEV!LLE PD 127 AUBURN PD 19 LINCOLN PD 22 ROCKLIN PD 55 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CORONA PD 158 BANNING PD 27 RIVERSIDE PD 360 BEAUMONT PD 38 BLYTHE PD 17 CATHEDRAL CITY PD 44 DESERT HOT SPRINGS P 26 HEMET PD 63 INDIO PD 63 MURRIETA PD 89 PALM SPRINGS PD 84 SACRAMENTO COUNTY ELK GROVE PD 128 CITRUS HEIGHTS PD 89 SACRAMENTO PD 644 FOLSOM PD 69 GALT PD 35 SAN BENITO COUNTY HOLLISTER PD 27 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CHINO PD 106 BARSTOW PD 38 FONTANA PD 180 COLTON PD 44 ONTARIO PD 236 MONTCLAIR PD 48 RIALTO PD 101 REDLANDS PD 80 SAN BERNARDINO PD 213 UPLAND PD 70 SAN DIEGO COUNTY CHULA VISTA PD 211 CARLSBAD PD 100 EL CAJON PD 115 CORONADO PD 39 ESCONDIDO PD 153 LA MESA PD 63 OCEANSIDE PD 198 NATIONAL CITY PD 86 SAN DIEGO PD 1,835 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY SAN FRANCISCO PD 2,178 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY STOCKTON PD - 370 ESCALON PD 10 LODI PD 66 MANTECA PD 64' RIPON PD 23 TRACY PD 81 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY ARROYO GRANDE PD 24 ATASCADERO PD 28 GROVER BEACH PD 16 MORRO BAY PD 17 PASO ROBLES PD 31 13-17 City Law Enforcement Grant 2016-17 Attachment II County Large Departments Number of Sworn Officers Small Departments Number of Swom Officers PISMO BEACH PD . 18 SAN LUIS OBISPO PD 58 SAN MATEO COUNTY DALY CITY PD 103 ATHERTON PD 19 SAN MATEO PD 109 BELMONT PD 30 BRISBANE PD 16 BROADMOOR PD 10 BURLINGAME PD 37 COLMA PD 19 EAST PALO ALTO PD 37 FOSTER CITY PD 34 HILLSBOROUGH PD 24 MENLO PARK PD 44 PACIFICA PD 29 REDWOOD CITY PD 92 SAN BRUNO PD 51 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 79 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY SANTA BARBARA PD 123 GUADALUPE PD 10 SANTA MARIA PD 114 LOMPOC PD 45 SANTA CLARA COUNTY SAN JOSE PD 904 CAMPBELL PD 40 SANTA CLARA PD 141 GILROY PD 62 SUNNYVALE DPS 204 LOS ALTOS PD 29 LOS GATOS PD 38 MILPITAS PD 83 MORGAN HILL PD 38 MOUNTAIN VIEW PD 89 PALO ALTO PD 84 SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CAPITOLA PD 20 SANTA CRUZ PD 93 SCOTTS VALLEY PD 18 WATSONVILLE PD 65 SHASTA COUNTY ANDERSON PD 16 REDDING PD 99 SISKIYOU COUNTY ETNA PD 2 LAKE SHASTINA DISTRIC 3 MOUNT SHASTA PD 8 TUL-ELAKE-RD---- --- - 2 WEED PD 9 YREKA PD 15 SOLANO COUNTY FAIRFIELD PD 119 BENICIA PD 31 VALLEJO PD 111 DIXON PD 19 RIO VISTA PD 12 SUISUN CITY PD 22 VACAVILLE PD 97 SONOMA COUNTY SANTA ROSA PD 171 CLOVERDALE PD 12 COTATI PD 11 HEALDSBURG PD 17 PETALUMA PD 61 ROHNERT PARK DPS 63 SEBASTOPOL PD 14 13-18 City Law Enforcement Grant 2016-17 Attachment II County Large Departments Number of Sworn Officers Small Departments Number of Sworn Officers STANISLAUS COUNTY MODESTO PD 197 CERES DPS 46 NEWMAN PD 12 OAKDALE PD 23 TURLOCK PD 75 SUTTER COUNTY YUBA CITY PD 53 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING PD 13 RED BLUFF PD 23 TULARE COUNTY VISALIA PD 132 DINUBA PD 36 EXETER PD 17 FARMERSVILLE PD 14 LINDSAY DPS 14 PORTERVILLE PD 58 TULARE PD 68 WOODLAKE PD 9 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA PD 12 VENTURA COUNTY OXNARD PD 225 PORT HUENEME PD 21 SIMI VALLEY PD 123 SANTA PAULA PD 29 VENTURA PD 127 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS PD 59 WEST SACRAMENTO PD 66 WINTERS PD 11 WOODLAND PD 62 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE PD 15 WHEATLAND PD 8 Total 27,3781 9,723 13-19 Data Completion Certification Form Attachment III Please Return Completed Form To: Adam Lavin at Adam.Lwin(c)bscc.ca.gov OR Attri: Adam Lwin 2590 Venture Oaks Way Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95833 13-20 City Police Department Number of Officers Amount City Police Department Contact Responsible for Reporting Requirements Signature of Police Chief or Designee Certifying Agreement to Use Funds and Report Data as Required by SB 826 Name Phone No: Email Name Si ature 1 Example: Oakland Police Dept. 250 $50,000 John Smith (123) 456-7890 ismith0123.net Jane Jones /-""-- 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 Please Return Completed Form To: Adam Lavin at Adam.Lwin(c)bscc.ca.gov OR Attri: Adam Lwin 2590 Venture Oaks Way Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95833 13-20 Bill Text - SB -826 Budget Act of 2016. 5227-102-0001—For local assistance, Board of State and Community Corrections ........................ 20,000,000 Schedule: (1) 4945 -Corrections Planning and Grant Program ........................ 20,000,000 Provisions: 1. According to a schedule provided by the Department of Finance, the funds appropriated in this item shall be allocated by the Controller to cities to increase positive outcomes between municipal law enforcement and high-risk populations. The Department of Finance shall work collaboratively with the California Police Chiefs Association to develop an allocation schedule that provides a minimum of 60 percent of the funding to police departments employing 100 or fewer officers and gives consideration to the following factors: (a) Jurisdictions with 'high homeless populations and mental illness rates. (b) Departments lacking existing resources for these efforts. (c) Jurisdictions who wish to use the funding for co -deployment teams, which consist of peace officers with crisis intervention training and either a county mental health professional or social worker. (d) Jurisdictions funding evidence -based programs that have been proven effective in improving interactions between law enforcement and high-risk populations. 2. Local law enforcement agencies may use the funds to supplement, not supplant, the following: (a) Homeless outreach teams. (b) Crisis Intervention Training for officers. Page 1 of 2 littps://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClieiit.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB826 1016/2016 13-21 Bill Text - SB -826 Budget Act of 2016. Page 2 of 2 (c) Gang Resistance Education and Training (GREAT). (d) Resources for drug endangered children. (e) Outreach to high-risk youth. (f) Youth diversion programs. (g) Gang and violence prevention programs, 3. Each department that receives funding from this item shall report the following, as applicable: (a) The number of new teams established, or planned to be established. (b) The type of training and the number of peace officers trained, or planned to be trained. (c) The type of equipment or resources that were purchased, or planned to be purchased. 4. The Board of State and Community Corrections shall compile the data reported by the local entities and shall provide it to the Legislature by April 1, 2017. littps://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClicnt.xhtnil?bill_id=201520160513826 10/6/2016 13-22 BSCC City Police Department Allocation M01 - Eve Gross Less Admin Net Small Depts Amount* Costs Distribution La Palma 63,479.58 61.49 63,418.10 Los Alamitos 63,479.58 61.49 63,418.10 Seal Beach 63,479.58 61.49 63,418.10 Laguna Beach 63,479.58 61.49 63,418.10 Placentia 63,479.58 61.49 63,418.10 Cypress 63,479.58 61.49 63,418.10 Brea 63,479.58 61.49 63,418.10 Fountain Valley 63,479.58 61.49 63,418.10 La Habra 63,479.58 61.49 63,418.10 Buena Park 63,479.58 61.49 63,418.10 Westminster 63,479.58 61.49 63,418.10 Tustin 63,479.58 61.49 63,418.10 737.84 761,017.16 761,755.00 Gross Less Admin Net Large Depts Amount" Costs Distribution Costa Mesa 57,143.44 55.35 57,088.09 Newport Beach 57,143.44 55.35 57,088.09 Fullerton 57,143.44 55.35 57,088.09 Orange 57,143.44 1 55.35 57,088.09 Garden Grove 57,143.44 55.35 57,088.09 Irvine 57,143.44 55.35 57,088.09 Huntington Beach 57,143.44 55.35 57,088.09 Santa Ana 57,143.44 55.35 57,088.09 Anaheim 57,143.44 55.35 57,088.09 514,291.00 498.15 513,792.85 FY 2016-17 TOTALS $ 1,276,046.00 $ 1,235.99, 1,2745810.01 Equals total allocation for small dep artments divided by number of small departments (12) *` Equals total allocation for large departments divided by number of large departments (9) 13-23