HomeMy WebLinkAbout17 - Confirm Annual Appointments to the Finance Committee - CorrespondenceReceived After Agenda Printed
June 26, 2018
Item No. 17
From: Brown, Leilani
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 9:54 AM
To: Mulvey, Jennifer
Subject: FW: Changes in the Finance Committee
Attachments: peotterfinancecommittee.docx
Leilani I. Brown, MMC
City Clerk
City of Newport Beach
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach I CA 192660
T 949-644-3005' (brown@newportbeachca.gov
Regular Business Hours, Excluding Holidays:
Monday to Thursday: 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Friday: 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
From: Keith Curry [mailto:keithcurryl@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 9:37 AM
To: Dept - City Council <CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov>
Cc: Brown, Leilani <LBrown@newportbeachca.gov>; hillary.davis@latimes.com; bvontvl@gmail.com; 'Christopher Trela
- NB Indy' <christopher@firebrandmediainc.com>; 'Canalis, John' <John.Canalis@latimes.com>;
sara@newportbeachindy.com; 'Sara Hall'<sarahallphotography@yahoo.com>; 'Norberto Santana'
<voiceofoc@gmail.com>; Tom@StuNewsNewport.com
Subject: Changes in the Finance Committee
Hon. Mayor and Members of the City Council.
Please find the attached correspondence regarding the proposed appointments to the city finance committee. I am
requesting that these comments be made part of the record and made available to the public at the meeting.
I am also copying the media and authorize them to be quoted in whole or part.
Best wishes,
Keith Curry
Hon. Mayor and Members of the City Council:
Tonight you will face one of those issues that defines if your orientation is to public service and the
betterment of our city, or if you are simply a cog in a failing, flailing, political machine.
Let's call the sacking of Diane Dixon from the finance committee and her replacement by Scott Peotter
what it is; a petty, petulant, small minded, exercise in political retribution by Mayor Duffield. Duffield is
apparently upset that Dixon courageously exposed the inconsistencies and falsehoods in Duffield's cover
story for the ousting of city manager Dave Kif£ This is yet another example of why Duffield is unfit to
be mayor of our city.
But the real damage is done by the appointment of Scott Peotter, the most financially incompetent and
reckless council member to serve in any city in recent memory. Let's review the Peotter financial record:
1. Peotter twice proposed slashing the Business License Tax by $3.5 million annually, creating a
structural deficit in the city budget.
2. Peotter supported and wrote an opinion piece in the Daily Pilot in favor of refusing $480,000 in
gas tax funds for badly needed road repairs in Newport Beach. Taxes paid by Newport motorists.
3. Peotter is a longtime advocate for selling the old city hall site. As you now know from your
closed session financial analysis, this Peotter idea would have cost the taxpayers tens of millions
of dollars.
4. In spite of analysis from our independent financial advisor showing it was a ridiculous proposal,
Peotter advocated the refunding of the civic center debt at a cost to the taxpayers of $20 million.
5. Peotter suggested that holders of city debt, currently trading a 120% of face value, would accept
30% on the dollar. The financial ignorance demonstrated by this position speaks for itself.
6. Peotter twice proposed that money designated for pension liability reduction be used to speculate
in the stock market. This decision would have cost the city millions and would have scuttled the
pension reduction efforts considered to be the most significant accomplishment of this council.
7. Peotter has explicitly stated that he would have accepted debt service $719,000 annually or a
minimum of $7 million over ten years higher in order to have a call feature in the civic center
debt. Even after your "show trial" hearing on debt most of you concluded yourselves that this
would have been a bad and reckless position.
8. Peotter proposed a variety of random, reckless and foolish ideas during the four budget hearings
he has participated in. These include slashing funding for police services on the peninsula,
increasing sea wall funding by $5 million in a year when it could not be spent, delaying the
completion of Marina Park and spending $200,000 on AV improvements in the council chamber
so that "he does not look like he is asleep" on TV broadcasts.
9. Peotter was the key vote in providing $355,000 in taxpayer funds to his major donor Woody's
Wharf.
10. Peotter supported incurring $320,000 in taxpayer costs to require a special election to repeal the
Museum House approvals.
11. Peotter supported an unnecessary payout of $200,000 following the ouster of the city manager.
12. Peotter advocated the change that allowed, and strongly supported the appointment of, convicted
embezzler Jack Wu to the finance committee. Wu was convicted of embezzling $173,000.
13. Peotter was a strong advocate for continuing the $16,000 per month lobbying contract for the
"Port Plan," a scheme the Coastal Commission staff called "laughable". This contract is now the
subject of a serious conflict of interest investigation.
14. Peotter is currently under active investigation or charges for one count of conflict of interest
violations, one count of Brown Act violations (this is in addition to his 2015 violation related to
his comments on group homes to the Costa Mesa Tea Party), four counts of campaign
contribution limit violations, (five additional counts are evidenced by his 2017 reports but were
not included in the initial complaint), and five counts of campaign reporting violations. Didn't
we learn anything from the Jack Wu scandal?
15. Peotter's personal financial record is relevant here. He defaulted on a $13 million loan in Irvine
and for ten years, until recently, was making restitution payments to the victims. He lost his own
(inherited) home in the Port Streets due to financial mismanagement. Do any of you believe this
record justifies him making multi-million dollar decisions on behalf of our residents?
BE WARNED: If you choose to place Peotter on the finance committee you become complicit in his
financial incompetence and recklessness. We can expect these ideas to appear again and again until he is
removed from the council. His appointment is an act of malpractice and HIS financial record will become
YOUR financial record.
This act of petty political retribution, undoubtedly carried out at the direction of Bob McCaffrey and Dave
Ellis is a defining moment for the city council. You were elected to serve the best interests of the city.
Don't let us down.
Keith Curry
Former Mayor
Received After Agenda Printed
June 26, 2018
Item No. 17 and 24
From:
Melinda <nbseely@aol.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, June 26, 2018 11:43 AM
To:
Dixon, Diane; Avery, Brad; Duffield, Duffy; Muldoon, Kevin; Herdman, Jeff; Peotter, Scott;
O'Neill, William
Cc:
Kiff, Dave; hseely@seelylaw.com
Subject:
City Council Meeting Tonight
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
We are concerned about actions you appear to be ready to take at the Council Meeting
tonight.
We refer to changing the rules for petition gathering within the CNB. I believe this is
unnecessary and a further abridgement of our rights as citizens to be involved in the City
affa i rs.
We also protest removing Diane Dixon from the Finance Committee to be replaced by
Scott Peotter. We have yet to learn that Mr. Peotter has special expertise in the realm of
finance that would prove to be more of a benefit to the Committee than Councilmember
Dixon who has the benefit of understanding what has already been addressed by the
Committee.
Melinda and Hall Seely
2833 Carob St.
Newport Beach 92660