HomeMy WebLinkAbout01_08-23-2018_ZA_MinutesNEWPORT BEACH ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MINUTES 08/23/2018
Page 1 of 3
NEWPORT BEACH ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MINUTES
100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach
Corona del Mar Conference Room (Bay E-1st Floor)
Thursday, August 23, 2018
REGULAR MEETING
3:00 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER – The meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m.
Staff Present: Patrick J. Alford, Zoning Administrator
Jaime Murillo, Senior Planner
Makana Nova, Associate Planner
II. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCES
None.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
ITEM NO. 1 Minutes of August 9, 2018
Action: Approved
IV. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
ITEM NO. 2 Ritner Group Lot Line Adjustment No. LA2018-001 (PA2018-026)
Site Location: 1604 and 1610 South Bay Front Council District 5
Makana Nova, Associate Planner, provided a brief project description on behalf of project planner, Chelsea Crager,
explaining that the applicant requests a lot line adjustment of the interior lot line between two residential parcels
located on Balboa Island. The request is to move the dividing lot line 10 feet to the west and widen the lot at 1610
South Bay Front by 850 square feet. The resulting lot width at 1610 South Bay Front is considered nonconforming;
however, the resulting lot width is less nonconforming than its current width. Ms. Nova stated that staff has reviewed
the lot line adjustment and determined that it does not require a Coastal Development Permit since the project is not
classified as “development” as defined in the Zoning Code and Local Coastal Program, the project does not result
in additional parcels, and there is no change in land use, density, or intensity.
Applicant Ron Ritner of Ritner Group, Inc., Architect, on behalf of the property owner, Barbara Grimm Marshall,
stated that he had reviewed the draft resolution and agrees with all of the required conditions.
The Zoning Administrator opened the public hearing.
Bob Baker, a resident of 110 Crystal Avenue, inquired as to why the lot line adjustment was necessary and stated
his opposition to the “McMansioning” of Little Balboa Island.
One additional member of the public, Jim Mosher, spoke and cited a California Supreme Court decision, stating his
opinion that the proposed project is considered a subdivision and therefore requires a coastal development permit.
Mr. Mosher went on to suggest that the Coastal Development Permit for the development of the homes should be
processed concurrently with the Lot Line Adjustment application, to avoid piecemealing under CEQA.
Ms. Nova responded to Mr. Baker’s inquiry, showing him an aerial view of the applicant’s request and explaining
that the lot line adjustment would instead decrease the size of the larger lot, bringing the two properties closer in
size. There would be no change in the overall project area.
NEWPORT BEACH ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MINUTES 08/23/2018
Page 2 of 3
Mr. Baker responded, stating his belief that there were three legal lots on this site and reiterating his concern
regarding the “McMansioning” of the Little Island. Mr. Baker went on to explain that he was prepared to go on to
oppose this project in court.
The Zoning Administrator inquired if the project is defined as a subdivision. Ms. Nova explained that while the
project is considered a “subdivision”, City staff has determined the lot line adjustment application does not result in a
change in land use, density, or intensity, and thus is not considered “development” requiring a coastal development
permit.
Ms. Nova went on to address Mr. Mosher’s second inquiry and explained that the applicant has submitted an
application for a new coastal development permit located at 1604 South Bay Front. The scope of work for new
homes on the site require their own coastal development permit applications. These applications were not
processed concurrently since the new lot lines must be recorded before permits for the development of the new
homes can be authorized. In this case, staff did not see an issue with processing one project before the other.
There were no other public comments.
Action: Approved
ITEM NO. 3 Contreras Residence Coastal Development Permit No. CD2018-012 (PA2018-031)
Site Location: 440 Harbor Island Drive Council District 5
Jaime Murillo, Senior Planner, provided a brief project description explaining the application as a coastal
development permit to allow the demolition of an existing single-family residence and construction of a 5,162-
square-foot, single-family residence with a 702-square-foot three-car garage that complies with all applicable
development standards. The project also includes the repair and reinforcement of the existing bulkhead to
support the cantilevered deck that includes a concrete curb with a height of 9.82 feet NAVD88 (10.0 feet MLLW),
compliant with the City’s Harbor Design Criteria standard. The replacement cantilevered concrete deck has been
designed in compliance with patio deck standards of Municipal Code; however, the projection beyond the existing
bulkhead, including protective concrete curb, falls under permit jurisdiction of the California Coastal Commission.
Therefore, a condition of approval has been included requiring the application to apply for and obtain approval of
the coastal development permit from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Lastly, the site is located near a public viewpoint, but site evaluation revealed that the proposed three-story design
is consistent with the existing neighborhood pattern of development and will not affect the existing views afforded
from the small viewing area.
Applicant Brett Coombs, on behalf of the Owner, stated that he had reviewed the draft resolution and agrees with all
of the required conditions.
The Zoning Administrator opened the public hearing.
One member of the public, Jim Mosher, spoke and stated that there may be confusion related to the permitting
jurisdiction of bulkheads based on a July California Coastal Commission report.
There were no other public comments.
The Zoning Administrator commented that he is in communication with the Mapping Unit of the California Coastal
Commission. The report mentioned by Mr. Mosher was related to a project involving State Tidelands. The City has
approved a number of coastal development permits involving bulkheads, with notice of final action provided to the
Coastal Commission and there has been no challenges.
In response to a question by the Zoning Administrator, Mr. Murillo clarified that Condition No. 8 requiring Coastal
Commission approval only applies if they seek approval of a new cantilevered deck and does not apply to repair
and maintenance.
NEWPORT BEACH ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MINUTES 08/23/2018
Page 3 of 3
Action: Approved
ITEM NO. 4 Blue Bottle Coffee Minor Use Permit No. UP2018-009 (PA2018-158)
Site Location: 3366 Via Lido Council District 1
Makana Nova, Associate Planner, provided a project description stating that this is a request for a coffee shop
within an existing office building. The coffee shop would be classified as a take-out service, limited, land use and
would be located within the bottom floor of the office building, occupying 1,372 square feet of gross floor area. The
coffee shop would include 502 square feet of net public area with a maximum of six seats and no alcohol service as
required by the definition for a take-out service, limited land use. The proposed hours of operation are from 7:00
a.m. to 7:00 p.m., daily. However, staff is suggesting some flexibility to allow hours of operation until 10:00 p.m.,
daily. The property is designated for Mixed-Use Water Related land use in the General Plan, Coastal Land Use
Plan, and Zoning Code and the proposed coffee shop is consistent with this land use designation. Ms. Nova went
on to explain that the take-out service limited land use has a parking requirement rate that is consistent with the
existing office use at one parking space per 250 square feet. Therefore, the proposed coffee shop is not considered
an intensification of land use and a traffic study and coastal development permit are not required at this time. If the
applicant chooses to expand the coffee shop at some point in the future, a conditional use permit, coastal
development permit, and traffic study may be required at that time to accommodate the increase in land use
intensity. Ms. Nova explained some of the project specific draft conditions of approval, including a requirement for a
flooring material to differentiate publically accessible areas for the coffee shop versus employee only office areas.
The Zoning Administrator inquired if there are any other improvements proposed to the building. Ms. Nova
explained that the existing office building is currently undergoing a shell renovation and interior tenant
improvements to accommodate a new office tenant. While the building was originally designed by noted architect
Weneceslaus Sarmiento, as part of the Balboa Savings Bank, the building has undergone significant alterations
and is not listed on the City’s historic resources inventory. The applicant has submitted a written narrative and
photos documenting the history of the site for the project file.
Applicant, Jennifer Walton of Hendy Associates, architect and representative on behalf of Blue Bottle Coffee, stated
that she had reviewed the draft resolution and agrees with all of the required conditions.
The Zoning Administrator opened the public hearing. Seeing that no one from the public wished to comment the
public hearing was closed.
Action: Approved
E. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
None.
F. ADJOURNMENT
The hearing was adjourned at 3:25 p.m.
The agenda for the Zoning Administrator Hearing was posted on August 17, 2018, at 2:03 p.m. in the
Chambers binder and on the digital display board located inside the vestibule of the Council Chambers
at 100 Civic Center Drive and on the City’s website on August 17, 2018, at 1:54 p.m.
Patrick J. Alford, Zoning Administrator