HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/18/1950 - Adjourned Regular Meeting.356
April 15th, 1950.
The City Council of the City of Newport Beach met in adjourned
session in the council chambers of the City Hall at the hour of 7:30 P.M.
The roll was called, the following councilmen answering present:
Greeley, Robertson, Isbell, Blue, Drake.
The Mayor asked if any of the councilman or anyone in the aud-
ience wished the minutes of the previous meeting or any part thereof read.
No one responded, and the reading of the minutes was waived.
The election demands, having been approved by the Finance Com-
mittee and signed by the Mayor and City Clerk, were ordered paid on motion
of Councilman Robertson, seconded by Councilman Greeley and carried by the
following roll -call vote:
AYES, COUNCILMEN: Greeley, Robertson, Isbell, Blue, Drake.
NOES, COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor stated that this was the time and place set by law for
Results of the purpose of canvassing the vote of the April 11th election, and the canvass
election was conducted by the City Clerk and the Special Legal Counsel.
Resolution No. 3787, being a Resolution declaring the results
of Election, held in the City of Newport Beach on the 11th day of April
1950, as required by law, was presented, and on motion of Councilman Ro-
RES. 90.3787 bertson, seconded by Councilman Greeley, the resolution was adopted by the
ELECTION RESULTS following roll -call vote:
AYES, COUNCILMEN: Greeley, Robertson, Isbell, Blue, Drake
NOES, COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: None
STATEMENT OF CITY CLERK.
I, C. K. PRIEST, do hereby certify and declare that a municipal
election was duly and regularly held in the City of Newport Beach on April
11th, 1950, and that the result of said election so held was as follows:
(a) That the whole number of votes cast in said City was 3313.
(b) That the names of candidates for the office of Councilmen
together with the number of votes given to each of said candidates in each
voting precinct in the City of Newport Beach, together with the whole number
of votes which they received in the entire City, are as follows:
NAMES OF CANDIDATES OFFICE NUMBER OF VOTES RECEIVED
LESTER L. ISBELL COUNCILMAN Precinct No. 1 - 62,
Precinct No. 2 - 80
Precinct No. 3 - 80
Precinct No. 4 96
Precinct No. 5 - 112
Precinct No. 6 - 67
Precinct No. 7 - 28
Precinct No. 8 - 112
Precinct No. 9 - 101
Precinct No.10 - 81
Precinct No 11 - 96
Precinct No.12 - 62
Precinct No.133 - 30
Precinct No.14 - 26
Precinct No.15 - 62
Precinct No.16 - 49
Precinct No.17 - 71
Precinct No.l$ - 102
.Precinct No.19 - 46
Precinct N0.20 - 61
Precinct No.21 - 34
Precinct N0.22 - 30
Precinct - - - _ —
Total number of votes - _
0. Z. ROBERTSON 60UNCILMAN Precinct
No. 1 -
32
Precinct
No. 2 -
50
Precinct
Precinct
.
No 3 m
58
No.
Precinct
No. 55
79
No. 6 -
Precinct
4
Precinct
No.
8
Precinct
-
No.
71
Precinct
No. 9 -
84
Precinct
No.10 -
59
Precinct
No 11 -
90
Precinct
No.12 -
40
'-1
CANDIDATES
ROBERT V. FAUST
BRADEN L. FINCH
FRANCIS.J. HORVATH
OFFICE
NUMBER OF
VOTES RECEIVED
Precinct
No. 13
- 48
Precinct
No. 14
46
Precinct
No. 15
- 47
Precinct
No. 16
- 38
Precinct
No. 17
- 29
Precinct
No. 20
- 55
Precinct
No. 21
-
Precinct
No. 22
47
- 5
Precinct
No. 23
Total number
of votes -
- -
1241
COUNCILMAN NUMBER OF VOTES
RECEIVED
Precinct
No. 1 -
Precinct
No. 2
-
Precinct
No. 3
- 6
Precinct
No. E
4
Precinct
No. 5
-
Precinct
No. 6
- 3
Precinct
No. 7
- 2
Precinct
No. 8
-
Precinct
No. 9
- 8
Precinct
No. 10
- 4
Precinct
No. 11
- 3
Precinct
No. 12
- 0
Precinct
No. Z3
2
Precinct
No. 1�+
- 4
Precinct
No. 15
- 4
Precinct
No. 16
- 1
Precinct
No. 17
- 3
Precinct
No. 18
- 14
Precinct
No. 19
- 3
Precinct
No. 20
- 11
Precinct
No. 21
-
Precinct
No. 22
- 4
Precinct
No. 23
- 2
Total number
of votes -
- - -
- - 102
COUNCILMAN
Precinct
No. 1
- 41
Precinct
No. 2
- 51
Precinct
No. 33
29
Precinct
No. 4
- 40
Precinct
No. 5
47
Precinct
No. b
- 99
Precinct
No.
9
4
Precinct
No.
-
Precinct
No. 9
- 46
Precinct
No.10
- 45 .
Precinct
No 11
- 30
Precinct
No.12
- 79
Precinct
No.13
- 109
Precinct
No.l
- 57
Precinct
No.15
- 71
Precinct
No.16
-
Precinct
No.17
- 56
Precinct
No.18
- 34
Precinct
No.19
- 72
Precinct
No.20
- "22
Precinct
No.21
- 69
Precinct
No.22
- 93
Precinct
No. 23
-
Total number
of votes -
- - -
-
COUNCILMAN
Precinct
No. 1
- 89
Precinct
No. 2
- 81
Precinct
No.
-
Precinct
No.
39
- 6
Precinct
No. 5
- 20
Precinct
No. 6
- 20
Precinct
No. 7
- 20
Precinct
No. 8
- 64
Precinct
No. 9
- 29
Precinct
N0.10
- 29
Precinct
No 11
- 22
Precinct
No.12
- 17
Precinct
No.13
- 11
Precinct
No.l
20
Precinct
No.15
- 39
Precinct
No.16
- 15
Precinct
No.17
- 29
Precinct
No.18
- 122
Precinct
No.19
- 16
Precinct
No.20
- 35
Precinct
No.21
- 15
Precinct
No.22
- 25
Precinct
No.23
- 8
Total number
of votes
- - - -
80'1
857
358
CANDIDATES OFFICE
NUMBER OF VOTES
RECEIVED
NORMAN MILLER COUNCILMAN
Precinct
No. 1 -
15
Precinct
No. 2 -
18
Precinct
No. 3
18
Precinct
No. 4 -
8
Precinct
No.
Precinct
No. -
25
Precinct
No. 7 -
8
Precinct
No. 8 -
9
Precinct
No. 9 -
6
Precinct
No.10 -
61
Precinct
No.11 -
4
Precinct
No.12 -
28
Precinct
No .13
1
Precinct
-
No.l
6
Precinct
No.15 -
16
Precinct
No.16 -
34
Precinct
No 17 -
13
Precinct
No.l8 -
18
Precinct
No.19 -
12
Precinct
No.29 -
11
Precinct
No.21 -
15
Precinct
No.22 -
8
Precinct
No.-
Total
number of votes - -
345
THOMAS F. (TOM)NORTON COUNCILMAN
Precinct
No...l-
18
Precinct
No. 2 -
38
Precinct
No. z -
22
Precinct
No. 4 -
40
Precinct
No. 5 -
40
Precinct
No. 6 -
64
Precinct
No.
8
29
Precinct
-
No.
Precinct
No.
334
Precinct
No.10 - 42
Precinct
No 11 -
27
Precinct
No.12 -
63
Precinct
No.133
86
Precinct
No. l4 -
31
Precinct
No. 15 -
i+7
Precinct
No.12 -
54
Precinct
No.17 -
34
Precinct
N0.18 -
17
Precinct
No.19 -
69
Precinct
No.20 -
14
Precinct
No.21 -
50
Precinct
No.22 -
61
Precinct
No.23 -
68
Total
number of votes
- - -100
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That Lester L. Isbell received, for
the office of City Councilman, the grand total of 1535 votes; that 0. Z.
Robertson received, for the office of City Councilman the grand total of
1241 votes; that Robert V. Faust received, for the office of City Council-
man, the grand total of 102 votes; that Braden L. Finch received, for the
office of City Councilman, the grand total of 1351 votes; that Francis J.
Horvath received, for the office of City Councilman the grand total of 801
votes; that Norman Miller received, for the office of City Councilman, the
grand total of 345 votes; that Thomas F. (Tom) Norton received, for the
office of City Councilman, the grand total of 1007 votes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That at said general municipal election
LESTER L. ISBELL was elected to the office of City Councilman of the City of
Newport Beach for the full term of four years.
That BRADEN L. FINCH was elected to the office of City Councilman
of the City of Newport Beach for the full term of four years.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 3878 was duly
and regularly passed by the city Council of the City of Newport Beach at an
adjourned regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of April, 1950, by the
following vote, to -wit:
AYES, COUNCILMEN: Greeley, Robertson, Isbell, Bluc, Drake
NOES, COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: None.
DICK DRAKE, Mayor
ATTEST:
C. X. PRIEST,
City Clerk
Resignation of Mayor Drake presented his resignation as Chairman of Sanitation
D. drake from District Board No. 6. On motion of Councilman Blue, seconded by Councilman
San.Dist.Bd.6 Greeley, the resignation was accepted by the following roll call vote:
AYES, COUNCILMEN: Greeley, Robertson, Isbell, Blue, Drake
NOES, COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: None
r.
359
Special Legal Counsel declared that Councilman L. L. Isbell had been
re- elected, and that Braden L. Finch had been elected as councilmen for the full term of
four years. Councilman Robertson retired, and Councilmen Finch and Isbell were
seated and sworn in. Councilmen Finch
& Isbell sworn in
On motion of Councilman Greeley, seconded by Councilman Blue, Lester
L. Isbell was elected Mayor by the following roll -call vote:
ATTEST:
u
AYES; COUNCILMEN: Finch, Drake, Greeley, Blue, Isbell
L.L.Isbell elected
NOES, COUNCILMEN: None
Mayor
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: None
Mayor Isbell appointed Councilmen Blue and Finch to the Finance
Committee, and on motion of Councilman Blue, seconded by Councilman Greeley, the
Blue & Finch
appointments were approved by the following roll call vote, to -wit:
Appointed to
Finance Committee
AYES, COUNCILMEN: Finch, Drake, Blue, Greeley, Isbell
NOES, COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: None
Mayor Isbell appointed Councilman Finch as Chairman and Councilman
Greeley member of Sanitation District Board No. The appointments were
Finch and Greeley
as 5.
confirmed on motion of Councilman Blue, seconded by Councilman Greeley and car-
appt. to San.Dist
ried by the following roll call vote:
Board. No.5
AYES, COUNCILMEN: Finch, Drake, Blue, Greeley, Isbell
NOES, COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: None
Mayor Isbell appointed Councilman Finch as a member of Sanitation
Board No. 6, On motion of Councilman Blue, seconded by Councilman Greeley, the
h Finc appointed
6.
appointment was confirmed by the following roll -call vote:
to San.Board
AYES, COUNCILMEN: Finch, Drake, Blue, Greeley, Isbell
NOES, COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: None
Mayor Isbell appointed Councilman Greeley and himself to serve
Greeley & Isbell
on the Harbor Committee, and on motion of Councilman Blue, seconded by Council-
man Drake, the appointment was approved by the following roll -call vote:
Committee
AYES, COUNCILMEN: Finch, Drake, Blue, Greeley, Isbell
NOES, COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: None
'
On motion of Councilman Greeley, seconded by Councilman Drake and
carried, the meeting was.adjourned, sine die.
Mayor
ATTEST:
u