HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/24/1958 - Adjourned Regular MeetingCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COUN_C_I!_M_E_N
Minutes of ADJOURNED REGULAR Page 123 - Volume 12
MEETING' OF THE CITY CCUNCIL
Date of Meeting: December 24, 1958 �, f`� 'N0
;ti y,p
Time of Meeting: 1:00 P.M.
Index Place of Meeting_ Council Chambers - - -`9P '0 i�B %9p�
--------------------------
• ; Roll Call: Present Ix; ;x x;x;xlx -
Absent x ;
R 4905 A memorandum was presented from the City. Manager
and the Public Works Director, recommending that ;
awarding the contract for the 15th Street Drainage Im-
15th St provement Project be awarded to H.O.W. Construction ;
drainage Co. Inc., the low bidder, at the contract price ;
improvement of I14,099.40
contract tb
H.O.W Construe- 4905 so awarding aid contract Motion- ; x,
Resolution No.
Lion Co, was adopted. g ' Second' ; :x:
CA -79 ; !Roll Cal
Aye s;xw lx;x;x:x:x
Absent' x. '
„
Authorization was given to return any checks '
received from the unsuccessful bidders, upon
the execution of the contract with the Motion x;
successful bidder, H.O.W. Construction Co., Second; : :x;
Inc. ;All Ayes; :
i x
Councilman Lorenz joined. the meeting at this ;
time.
R 4906 ; Resolution No. 4906, establishing the terms of
employing ; the employment of Laurence J. Thompson, an
L.J.Thomps�n Assessment Engineer, in connection with the pro-
in connectioiceedings to set up an improvement district for
with MargateB he improvement of the private easement known as Motion:x;
Dr improve$ Margaret Drive, extending northwesterly from its Second: ; ; Ix; ;
ment distrtcdntersection with Irvine Avenue, as a public Roll Call:; ;
CA -46 ; street, was adopted. Ayes X: x;X xIx;x;x
„
R 4907
Resolution No. 4907, appointing and employing
appointing; William MacKenzie Brown, Attorney at Law, to
W.M. Brown; examine plans and specifications and to prepare
to examine; resolutions and all other necessary documents in Motion;x;
plans & ; said Assessment District proceedings for the im- Second' I ;x.
specs for ; provement of Margaret Drive as a public street, Roll Cal.:; ; ;
Mar aret was adopted. Ayes; x,x,x;x!x'.x:x
4vr iv CA -4b ' ' ' ; ;
Budget Amendment No. 58 -92, in the amount of Motion; ; .x
� $800, was approved. ; Second; ; ; ; :x:
Budget ; !All Ayes;
Amendments;
CA -102 3 In connection with the 17th Street Annexation ;
litigation, the petition of owners of property
17th Street within the 65 acres, and the petition signed by
Annexation; persons (representing 45 parcels of land outside
CA -108 ; the 65 acres), requesting annexation to the City
of Newport Beach which were taken under sub- ;
mission by the City Council on December 22, 1958
the City Attorney stated it was entirely within ;
the discretion of the City Council as to whether '
or not a petition should be filed with the
California Supreme Court.
Attorney Jack Lande, representing interested '
property owners, spoke from the audience re-
questing that the Council file a petition with
the California Supreme Court to determine the
• ; validity of the competing annexati pof th e City of Costa Mesa „
ATTEST: yor
City Clerk Peg& 123
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Page 124 - Volume 1
COUNCILMEN
Index _4December 24 1958) pjF�E1,�C ti�B.00
-- -------------------------------------------------------- ;--- - - - - --
Mayor Stoddard stated that he believed it was in
order to call a short conference with the City
Attorney and declared a fifteen minute recess.
The meeting. reconvened. The roll was called with;
all members present. ; Present :x;x xixix�'x.
17th Streberhe City Attorney was directed to file a Petition; Motion; ; ;x; ; ;
Annexation for Hearing in the California Supreme Court, in ; Second; ; ;x;
CA -108 connection with the 17th Street Annexation. ;All Ayes;
„
R 4908 Resolution No. 4908, appointing and associating ;
appoy,.o-inl Jack Lands as Associate Counsel for the purpose '
J. Lande ++ of filing a petition with the California Supreme ;
/3sac. Court to seek a hearing in the cases of the City
CaLmsel of Newport Beach v. City of Costa Mesa and City ; Motion; ;x;
for hearimgof Costa Mesa v. City of Newport Beach to Second, ' ' ; ;x;
in Suprem� determine the validity of the competing annexatior8 Roll CallF ; 1 ; ; ;
Court NB proceedings,:was adopted. ; Ayes ;x :lgx;x;x;X x
v. Costa 1 ;
i sa 1 The City Attorney was directed to prepare a ; Motion
• brief an the method of determining the validity ; Second:x;
,
,
of 'Use. Permits and Variances. All Ayes:
Brief on ;
validity ; The meeting was adjourned. Motion: ;x ;
of Use ' + .Second +x;
Permits &; All Ayes:
Variances;
CA -108
,
„ +
„
ATTEST:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
z,--L
or
,
,
;
aty er 5 Page 124
„