Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/14/1983 - Regular Meeting4, REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING PLACE: Council Chambers TIME: 7:30 P.M. DATE: February 14, 1983 MINUTES imns :y On behalf of the City Council, Mayor Hart expressed thanks to Boy Scout Troop #746 for their presentation in commemoration of National Boy Scout Week. Present x x x x x x x A. ROLL CALL. Motion x B. Reading of the Minutes of the Meeting of All Ayes January 24, 1983 was waived, approved as written and ordered filed. Motion x C. Reading of all ordinances and resolutions under All Ayes consideration was waived, and the City Clerk was directed to read by titles only. D. HEARINGS: 1. Mayor Hart opened the public hearing and City GPA 81 -3 Council review regarding GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (45) 81 -3, a request initiated by the City of Newport Beach to amend the Newport Beach General Plan for Block 900 of Newport Center s as to allow the expansion of the existing MARRIOTT HOTEL with the addition of 234 guest rooms, a ballroom, cocktail lounge and restaurant, a video game room, related hotel and service facilities, and a 574 space parkin structure. The proposal also includes the acceptance of an Environmental Document. Property located at 900 Newport Center Drive, on the southwesterly corner of Newport Center Drive West and Santa Barbara Drive, in Newport • Center; zoned C -O -H; AND TRAFFIC STUDY, a request to consider a Traffic Tfk Stdy Study so as to allow the expansion of the Marriott Hotel; AND SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 29, a request to approve Site Pln the proposed site plan in conjunction with the Rev 29 expansion of the existing Marriott Hotel, and to permit required off- street parking on a demonstrated formula; AND USE PERMIT NO. 2095, a request to allow for the U/P 2095 establishment of an electronic video game center in the expanded Marriott Hotel facility. This proposal also includes modifications to the Zoning Code so as to allow for the use of compact car spaces and automobile spaces that are not independently accessible. Reports from the Planning Department were presented. Volume 37 - Page 47 MINUTES I bUl *.i A letter received after the printing of the GPA 81 -3 agenda from Michael D. Stephens, Admin#strator, Hoag Memorial Hospital- Presbyterian, requesting • Council approval, was presented. The City Manager addressed the Council, stating that the Applicant was prepared to make a special presentation at this time, and there being no objections from the Council, asked that questions directed at the Applicant and City staff be reserved until" after the presentation.. David Neish, Urban Assist, Inc., representing the Applicant, the Marriott Hotel, addressed the Council reviewing the five different applications relating to the Marriott Hotel expansion: General Plan Amendment, which would allow for the existing 317 unit hotel to expand by a total of 234 units; acceptance of an EIR; site plan, which would provide a new 210 room tower with related hotel facilities; use permit, which would request an allocation for a reduction in parking; and traffic study, which would allow for the expansion of the Marriott that shows compliance with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance. At this time, Mr. Neish introduced Dick Senechal, Local Project Director from Washington, D.C.; Ray Kovacks, Newport Beach General Manager of the Marriott Hotel; and John • Moore, Principal Partner, Flatow, Moore, Bryan and Associates, Albuquerque, New Mexico, who were in the audience and assisted in tonight's presentation. Mr. Neish turned the presentation over to Mr. Moore, who addressed the Council and utilized models and slides to explain the project as it is now, and also which enacted the image of what the project will be like when finished. At the conclusion of his presentation, Mr. Moore turned the presentation back to Dave Neish. Mr. Neish addressed the Council, requesting five additional minutes. Metion x Motion was made to grant the request for five All Ayes additional minutes. Mr. Neish continued with his presentation, updating the Council regarding the issues raised by the Planning Commission during the December 9, 1982 meeting regarding: Traffic - The proposal is estimated to generate only 2,800 daily trips, with only • Volume 37 - Page 48 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COUNCIL MEMBERS G A Z�•Q SJP February 14, 1983 MINUTES INDEY 190 occurring during the peak hour period. GPA 81 -3 Mr. Neish indicated that a large number of • these trips probably occurred during the evening hours when there is not a traffic problem, particularly not in Newport Center. There were 24 intersections analyzed by the City staff and Traffic Consultant: Wes Pringle, and with mitigations, none of the intersections exceed the .9 limitation, and as a result, the proposal complies with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance. The circulation system the City staff is requiring as conditions of approval will be met and concurred with. Parking - Another issue raised was that'of parking, and as a result, a special parking study was, again, performed by West Pringle, and the study concluded that the Marriott Hotel Study provided parking on a ratio of 1.26 spaces per room, and that summer weekend demand, which is higher than winter, or weekday demand, is represented by 1.31 spaces per room. During the summer weekends, surveys conducted (during the months of July and August) showed an overflow occurred for the existing operation and also during special events when the demand for parking • increased. In both cases, however, the use of tandem parking by the existing valet accommodated the cars on the site of the Marriott Hotel. On one occasion, an additional 125 cars were able to be accommodated by the valet tandem parking. The City's parking study concludes that tandem parking can easily accommodate the nominal operating demands of the hotel. As a condition of approval, the City staff is requiring that the Marriott Hotel must obtain an agreement to utilize Fashion Island, or other adjacent facilities during construction for overflow during peak periods, and for the special events. During most of the year, a significant amount of excess parking exists in Newport Center. Also, it must be remembered that practically all of Newport Center, particularly Fashion Island, is.primarily a daytime activity use, whereas the Marriott is primarily a nighttime use. We have the advantage of being able to project well into the future when these peak occasions will occur, and with the • Volume 37 - Page 49 COUNCIL MEMBERS 17���` A�� LL QL on yes • MINUTES February 14, 1983 INDEX assistance of Mr. Kovacks, he can tell us GPA 81 -3 when those major fund - raising and civic functions, at the Marriott Hotel are going to be, so that at this point, the hotel will have the opportunity for their employees to park at one of the adjacent facilities. The Applicant feels that parking is not a problem, and the City staff has concluded in their staff report that they also feel that parking is not a problem, provided that the 10 conditions of approval, which they are requiring the Marriott Hotel to meet, will be met. Again, the Marriott Hotel concurs with the conditions, and they will, in fact, be met. Airport Impaction - The final issue was that of impact on the airport. There was a survey conducted at the Marriott Hotel indicating that approximately 50% of the guests that stay at the hotel arrive by air which;, by the way, is lower than all other hotels in the airport (Newport Beach -Costa Mesa) area. Of the 50 %, 23% utilize John Wayne Airport. In other words, a great majority of the people that stay at the Marriott Hotel that arrive by air come into LAX, Ontario or San Diego. x Motion was made to grant another five minutes to finish Mr. Neish's presentation. Mr. Neish continued that another fact is that the Marriott guests stay an average of two to three nights, whereas many of the other hotels in the area, such as the Sheraton, Airporter Inn, and Registry, experience less than two nights, in fact, some of them less than one night on the average. The figures that the EIR indicate are very subjective. Both the City's staff and the EIR Consultant recognize this. The guests that will stay in these 234 rooms are already coming to Newport Beach, or the immediate airport region. In other words, the market demand is based on a regional standard, and not a local standard. It can be assumed that, if these units are not going to be built in Newport Beach, they will be built somewhere else in the nearby regional vicinity. Mr. Neish stated, that in the Applicant's opinion, they do not feel that Newport Beach, alone, can resolve the airport issue regarding hotels. As we all know, Volume 37 - Page 50 COUNCIL MEMBERS �` ZS FQGs • 0 MINUTES February 14, 1983 INDEX hotels are being built in Irvine, Costa GPA 81 -3 Mesa, Santa Ana, and Anaheim, etc., and you can believe those people are going to utilize John Wayne Airport even more than the Marriott Hotel guests. The additional rooms will provide over $1 million per year of revenue to the City of Newport Beach. He stated that the Marriott Hotel does not think it is wrong for the City to reap some'of the benefits that all of the neighboring cities are taking advantage of, and respectfully requests that they hoped the City does not, either. He maintained that, after a thorough review, the City's staff and the EIR Consultant concluded there are no significant environmental impacts associated with this proposal. He pointed out that there are some very significant financial benefits to the City, such as the bed tax and sales tax revenues. The expansion will provide additional rooms, and at the same time, improve what the Marriott feels is an already outstanding facility. Therefore, he respectfully requests Council's approval of the proposed project, and he was prepared to answer questions of the Council. In answer to Council's inquiry regarding the difference of this year's expansion, as compared to last year's expansion of the Marriott, Mr. Neish stated that first of all, there was a change in the number of rooms, and that is based on the market demand which has occurred in Orange County. The Marriott has decided to substantially upgrade the type of facility to a much higher quality type facility. The ballroom facility containing 5,500 sq. ft., is the same as what was originally proposed. The upgrades are somewhat insignificant changes, but are changes nevertheless. A dramatic change was for a subterranean parking facility vs. an above- ground parking structure, for the main reason to accommodate the Fire Department, which would enable them to maneuver their fire fighting apparatus more successfully. The reason for the height change from 130 ft. to the proposed 152 ft., is that they have changed the style, due to larger and wider rooms, with less rooms per floor than the original approved plans, 16 -18 rooms per floor; originally 24 rooms per floor. Volume 37 - Page 51 • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES February 14, 1983 In response to Council's inquiry regarding the GPA 81 -3 $1 million per year in revenue to the City, Mr. Neish clarified that this was total revenue from the entire hotel; the existing hotel represents approximately $600,000, and the expansion, approximately $400,000 (additional revenue generated from bed and sales tax). This does not take into consideration the guests that will stay at the Marriott that shop in the numerous businesses and restaurants in Fashion Island. The City Manager referred Council to the staff report regarding the intent of Resolution No. 9009 and General Plan Amendments 79 -1, and 80 -3. He stated that these items were approved at a time when the Council expressed concern about piecemeal growth. Some studies were requested by the Council, which ultimately culminated in not only suggested buildup in Newport Center, but all the vacant parcels within the City of Newport Beach. Resolution No. 9009 came before the Council during the period of time that the City wanted to see total effects upon the infrastructure of the City. Resolution No. 9009 dealt with just Newport Center and listed the existing, proposed, and the total of the following uses: office and medical, commercial retail restaurant, theatre, hotel, residential, civic, cultural, automotive, golf course and tennis clubs. With respect to hotels, the existing in 1977 showed 377 rooms; the proposed showed zero in terms of expansion, and the total again shows the 377 rooms, which was existing at the time in the Marriott, and that is the current status today. The current General Plan, which has been amended a number of times since 1977, still does not permit additional hotel expansion, thus the need for tonight's hearing. The Planning Director, in answer to Council inquiry concerning future hotels not covered in the staff report, stated that in Newport Center there is a proposal in Block 800, which is the subject of a part of the General Plan Amendment currently being heard by the Planning Commission, and that would be to restore 80,000 sq. ft. of medical office in Block 400. The subject of a future proposed hotel would be a separate General Plan Amendment that has been initiated by the City Council, and under the current scheduling the Planning Department anticipates holding a public hearing before the Planning Commission, either the 2nd meeting in April, or the 1st meeting in May. Volume 37 - Page 52 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COUNCIL MEMBERS MINUTES G+�� �� q� Z��1 ��G$P February 14, 1983 INDEX The City Manager, in response to Council GPA 81 -3 inquiry, clarified_ that the 1.31 parking.ratio (801 spaces) was a condition of approval, with • 768 spaces being on -site and 33 being off -site covered with a future off -site parking agreement. With regard to the traffic improvement funds, the City Manager, referred Council to the EIR, page 71 (summary of the recommended improvements). Specifically, on legal grounds, the City separated two types of improvements; the latter improvements before occupancy refers specifically to the traffic study that was done, pursuant to the Traffic Phasing Ordinance and Council Policy S -1. He stated that the City had previous opinions that the Traffic Phasing Ordinance requires improvements to particular intersections to bring the ICU count down to .9, or less, and the $242,000 is an estimate which could actually be higher or lower in reality, but legally, the funds cannot be co- mingled with alleys, etc., because the Traffic Phasing Ordinance isolated specific intersections, and specific work that has to be done. With regard to approval of future hotel facilities, the City Manager stated that it may be more difficult for them to meet a reasonable cost for the Traffic Phasing Ordinance compliance. Unless there is an overriding social consideration, by vote of the Council, • their intersections must meet the .9, or Council cannot approve the Traffic Study. Therefore, it is impossible at this stage to predict if any future hotel facility could be approved that would generate that amount of traffic. The Planning Director, in response to Council's inquiry regarding the C -O -H zoning and what discretionary action could be taken to limit any project, stated that would be the action before them on the General Plan Amendment and EIR. Council could approve the EIR as being complete and adequate and in conformance with State law, and still deny the project. If the General Plan Amendment is denied, then the rest of the suggested action on the agenda becomes moot. Upon invitation of Mayor Hart, the following people addressed the Council: John McCabe urged approval of the project, referring to the fact that the City needs a broader tax base, and that if this Council does not approve the project, the, extra rooms will be immediately built beyond Newport Beach City boundaries, with • substantial revenues going elsewhere. Volume 37 - Page 53 COUNCIL. MEMBERS �$�� $���G��� ��� .yam �� Gss • • • MINUTES February 14, 1983 INDEX Tim Parker, President, Fashion Island GPA 81 -3 Merchants Association, strongly urged support for the Marriott Corporation expansion;, citing the increased evening hour business generated by hotel patrons, especially down among the Bullocks- . Wilshire wing of Newport Center. He also stated that if visiting dignitaries and company people could be accommodated into hotels in the Newport Center area, automobile traffic could be lessened. Michael Stephens, Chief Executive Officer of Hoag Memorial Hospital- Presbyterian, stated he was appearing on behalf of the Board of Directors of Hoag Hospital to urge support for the Marriott expansion. As he indicated in his letter to Council, Hoag Hospital has been the beneficiary of the Marriott Corporations interest in the community, in particular, nonprofit corporations and charities, benefitting from the proceeds of the opening of the original Marriott, and the numerous events that have been held since that time. The Marriott has been an exemplary citizen of the City. With respect to the ballroom, they have one particularly successful event, the Christmas Carol Ball, which could be expanded in considerable numbers, thereby increasing the proceeds that go to Hoag Hospital's Development Department. With respect to keeping this event and other functions with their particular Newport Beach theme, history and tradition, they would like to be able to continue to utilize the Marriott Hotel. Dick Nichols, representing the Corona del Mar Community Association Board of Directors, stated that the Marriott is a convention- center -type hotel. The additional ballrooms, meeting rooms, will draw conventions to the City, thereby increasing airport traffic. He expressed concern regarding the fact that some of the traffic capacity being used here should be subtracted from the PC property if we are going to keep the same General Plan consistency. They have no particular objections to a hotel, per se, but they do have objections of some of the foregoing aspects, and would like to see them addressed by the Council, prior to approval. Volume 37 - Page 54 • • 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES 14, 1983 The City Manager, at the direction of GPA 81 -3 Council responded that the zoning is C-0-H, but the General Plan would be the factor that would set the total number of rooms rather than zoning, because the 3 x buildable, as Mr. Nichols indicated, could go many, many more rooms than that which is being proposed here. The Marriott proposal of .7, is far below the General Plan's condition number of buildable rooms per floor area ratio of 3.0 allowed. Pat Hollander, 213 Via Dijon, urged denial of the Marriott application for.several reasons. Should the Council consider the Marriott from the whole of Newport Center, they will have scrapped the General Plan for the area, a plan in her opinion, that was drafted with citizen participation, and for the protection of local residents and businesses. She was concerned.with the number of hotels planned area wide. These hotels will have a tremendous cumulative! impact, in addition to the Marriott, on pressures for John Wayne Airport to expand. As a City most impacted by the airport, and perhaps most adversely affected by street traffic, Newport Beach City Council should offer leadership to help solve these problems confronting Orange County, such as pollution, overdevelopment, and traffic congestion topping the list. She urged that this proposed expansion of the Marriott should be tabled until there is a plan to take into account the surrounding area, both within and outside of the City. In response to Council's inquiry, the Planning Director stated that the proposed project is out of the PC District, and that the PC zoning in Newport Center is along Coast Highway. Louise Greeley, 16 Swift Court, stated that she endorsed the statements made by Pat Hollander, and that the City will never win the lawsuit regarding airport expansion if they continue to supply more airport customers. What justification is there for considering the approval of even more Marriott Hotel rooms, than were requested in General Plan Amendment 80 -3, the plan which resulted in being returned because of the opposition of many residents. She understands that the City is in excellent fiscal condition, thanks to the wisdom of the Council and City Volume 37 - Page 55 • • • MINUTES 14, 1983 Manager, and agrees that there are some GPA 81 -3 attractive pluses regarding additional revenues to the City. She urged the Council to reduce the number of rooms requested., stating that she is concerned of the visual impact of the proposed higher tower. Elizabeth Braley, 1124 Estelle Lane, confined her issue to the expansion of the Marriott Hotel, which will promote business in the Newport Beach area. She suggested that the Marriott provide retail space within the lobby of their hotel and promote advertising in exchange for the parking they desire in the Newport Center area. If the Marriott Hotel wishes to expand and profit, she felt that they should take in all of Newport Center, and together, they will all profit. Katherine Jorgensen, 1517 Highland Drive, stated she was opposed to the construction of any additional hotel facilities in Newport Beach. She felt that anything else would he contrary to the best interests of the vast majority of residents of Newport Beach. She cited increased ground and air traffic will cause business and airport lobby interests to press for further expansion of facilities; and the additional rooms would convert the Marriott into a businessmen's convention hotel. She quoted that Supervisor Nestande warned the City on several occasions, stating that it does not make sense for Newport Beach to work at keeping the airport contained in size, and then to allow more hotel rooms to be built that will increase air and surface traffic. She asked why do Newport Beach decision makers look to the Cities of Costa Mesa., Santa Ana and Anaheim as models of city development worth emulating, further stating that a city, like individuals, can always use more money. She urged the City Council to break its track record of the past few years of approving requests for additional hotel facilities, and say "no ",to this request. Sue Ficker, 110 -9th Street, Balboa, stated that the City "robs Peter to pay Paul," and that the City must keep increasing the tax base through encouraged development. She cited increased fire services, police, water, and energy. She pointed out that Volume 37 _ Page 56 MINUTES February 14, 1983 hotels are not confronted with any type of GPA 81 -3 water conservation, and they compete • equally with residential uses. In summary, she felt that the City needed to do a great deal more studies regarding water and energy uses by hotel facilities before a decision is.made regarding the Marriott expansion. David Neish, addressed the Council regarding the issues brought before them by residents appearing before the Council, stating that he had a couple of items that he had not mentioned before. He stated that the Marriott Hotel is, in fact, a convention hotel. Of the total business the Marriott transacts, 13% is of a convention business nature, but he feels that this 13% is insignificant. The proposal before the Council tonight doesn't mean that overnight the Marriott will become a convention center. They are proposing a 5,500 sq. ft. meeting room. Another issue of concern he has heard, is the zoning on the property, which allows 3 x buildable area, allowing them to build 2,555 rooms on this site. They don't want to build 2,555 rooms and are proposing only 611 rooms. Another issue, was that they are using up everything and is there going to be anything left. Again, the City has an adopted set of standards, and in this case, the Traffic Phasing Ordinance, which every applicant that • comes before the Council must go through and demonstrate that they, in fact, can meet the requirements of that ordinance, as well as those that come after the Marriott Hotel. Another issue that Mr. Neish touched on was the concern placed on the fact that 165 rooms was sufficient two and one -half years ago, why isn't that sufficient today. Since that period of time, the hotel demand has increased in Orange County substantially. He felt that the Marriott proposal is very fair and regarding the height of the building and fire safety, that hotels are the most scrutinized in the entire U.S., as far as fire safety. One issue before the Planning Commission was of fire safety, and they have sprinklers, fire alarms, everything that possibly could be done by the City's Building Code because of the recent fires in Kansas City and Las Vegas. The public hearing was closed, after it was determined that no one else wished to address the Council. • Volume 37 - Page 57 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COUNCIL MEMBERS �c 0 8P19 @- t CAI B '9 ��'p ��S February 14, 1983 MINUTES IM11M 4 Motion x. Motion was made: to sustain the recommendations GPA 81 -3 of the Planning; Commission and approve the • following: (a) Adopt Resolution No. 83 -16 accepting, approving and certifying the Final EIR (Attachment A, Exhibit 1); (b) Make the Findings contained in the Statement of .Facts (Attachment A, Exhibit 2) with respect to significant impacts identified in the Final EIR; (c) Find that the facts set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations (Attacheme:pt A, Exhibit 3) are true and are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including the Final EIR; (d) With respect to the project, find that although the Final EIR identifies certain unavoidable significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, those mitigation measures identified in Attachment A, Exhibit 4, shall be incorporated into the proposed project, and all significant environmental effects that can feasibly be mitigated or avoided have been eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level, and • that the remaining unavoidable significant effects, when balanced against the facts set forth in said Statement of Overriding Considerations (Attachment A, Exhibit 3), giving greater weight to the unavoidable environmental effects, are acceptable; (e) Adopt Resolution No.83 -17 (as amended, "that the Marriott Motel shall pay its financial obligations as described in the supplemental staff report of February 14, 1983. ") approving the amendment to the Land Use Element of the Newport Beach General Plan (Attachment A, Exhibit 5); (f) Approve the Traffic Study with the Findings and subject to the Conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission (Attachment C); Volume 37 - Page 58 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COUNCIL MEMBERS ROL CA '►1 �� February 14, 1983 MINUTES INDEX (g) Approve Site Plan Review No. 29 with GPA 81 -3 the Findings and subject to the Conditions • as recommended (Attachment C); AND (h) Approve Use Permit No. 2095 with the Findings and subject to the Conditions as recommended (Attachment C). Motion x Substitute motion was made to approve the Ayes x x Marriott expansion with the provision that the Noes x x x x x height of the building tower not exceed 125 feet, and that the maximum number of rooms be limited to 200 rooms, which FAILED. Ayes x x x x x - Following a discussion, a vote was taken on the Noes x x main motion, which carried. 2. Mayor Hart opened the public hearing regarding Ord 83 -10 ORDINANCE NO. 83 -10, being, Open Space/ Zoning AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH (94) AMENDING SECTIONS 20.11.040 AND 20.15.080 OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE AS THEY PERTAIN TO REVISIONS OF THE OPEN SPACE OPTION REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENT NO. 852, PCA 852 initiated by the City of Newport Beach. • Report from the Planning Department, was presented. The City Manager addressed the Council, stating that this amendment was approved by the Planning Commission, and basically, it makes the R -1, R -3 and R -4 consistent with the R -2 in providing open space, permitting the exterior stairways to extend into the cubicle open space. Brion Jeannette, 470. Newport Boulevard, addressed the council in support of the amendment to the Open Space option, and' requested Council approval. After it was determined that no one else wished to address this item, the public hearing was closed. Motion x Motion was made to approve Planning Commission All Ayes Amendment No. 582, and adopt Ordinance No. 83 -10. • Volume 37. - Page 59 101MEWSIA►1 Mazda �:T��i 1 v° it r�TR a .1 XMI a, L J Motioi All A • Motini All A • MINUTES February 14. 1983 INDEX 3. Mayor Hart opened the public hearing and City U/P 3016/ Council review of USE PERMIT NO. 3016 AND Resub 738 RESUBDIVISION NO. 738, requests of Oceanfront (88 6 84) Views, Redlands, approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting of January 20, 1983, to construct a two -unit residential condominium complex and related off - street parking spaces in the R -4 District and create one parcel of land for residential condominium purposes, at 408 East Ocean. Front, on the northerly side of East Ocean Front between Adams Street and Coronado Street on the Balboa Peninsula. Report from the Planning Department, was presented. The City Manager addressed the Council, stating that the Applicant is proposing to demolish the existing single - family structure and construct a 2 -unit residential condominium complex, which was approved by the Planning Commission. After it was determined that no one wished to speak on this item, the public hearing was closed. n x Motion was made to sustain the Planning Commission's decision of approval. yes After discussion, the motion was voted on, and carried. E. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. F. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1 x The following actions were taken as indicated, yes except for those items removed: 1. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - Pass to second reading and adoption on February 28, 1983: (a) Proposed ORDINANCE NO. 83 -12, being, Ord 83 -12 Veh /Pkg AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT (63) BEACH! AMENDING SECTION 12.40.055 OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PARKING OF CERTAIN VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS(Report from Assistant to the City Manager) (b) Proposed ORDINANCE NO. 83 -13, being, Ord 83 -13 Penalty AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT Provision BEACH REPEALING SECTION 1.04.030 OF (70) THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING CREDIT FOR LABOR DURING IMPRISONMENT (Report from City Attorney). Volume 37 - Paea 60 COUNCIL MEMBERS V 0 �, 1 $ a IaD9 9 t°�11 0 Op kp February 14, 1983 MINUTES INDEX (c) Removed from the Consent Calendar. 2. RESOLUTIONS FOR. ADOPTION: (a) Removed from the Consent Calendar. (b) Resolution. No. 83 -19 authorizing the Mayor Union Bk/ and City Clerk to execute an Agreement Radio Twr with The Irvine Company authorizing use of Res 83 -19 Union Bank Building premises as a radio C -1502 tower installation site. (Report from (38) City Manager) (c) Resolution No. 83 -15 appointing Robert H. City Atty Burnham as City Attorney for the City of Res 83 -15 Newport Beach, establishing the salary (31) therefor, and rescinding Resolution No. 83 -8. 3. CONTRACTS/AGREEMENTS: (a) Approve Engineering Services Agreement for Balboa Ycht the Balboa Yacht Basin Reconstruction; and Ban Rcstr authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to C -2377 execute subject Agreement with Ron Lundin (38) and Associates. (Report from Public Works) 4. COMMUNICATIONS - For referral as indicated: (a) To staff for inclusion in the records, CATV /Grp W • communication from Group W Cable informing Cable the City regarding their new /expanded (42) programming. (b) To Public Works for reply, request from C. Agate /SBay B. Knickerbocker to raise seawall at Agate Fr Seawl and South Bay Front. (74) (c) To General Services Department for Garbage/ inclusion in the records, letter of Trash appreciation for assistance from trash (44) collectors servicing 111 Edgewater, Balboa. (d) To Planning Department for reply, request Planning/ from V & R Enterprises, Inc., for refund Use Perm of use permit fee (video games). (68) (e) To Public Works for inclusion in the Arches Brdg records, recommendations /suggestions from (74) West Newport Beach Association regarding their review of plans for reconstruction of the Arches Bridge. Volume 37 - Page 61 �M1111,511 71,11 1 q COUNCIL MEMBERS \A1 0Rn1 1 $A GAS February 14, 1983 MINUTES INnF)f (f) To staff for inclusion in the records, - o Legislation communications /update from State of (48) • California, Senator John Seymour regarding potential impact of bailout revenues on the City of Newport Beach. (g) To staff for response, letter from Mayor Legislation of Anaheim, urging support from cities (48) within the California Air Quality region to request: an exemption of federal highway funds generated by the gas tax increase from Environmental Protection Agency sanctions. (h) To staff for review, Notice of Secretary CA /State of the Business, Transportation and Trnsp /Hsg Housing Agency, Sacramento, proposing the (28) adoption, amendment and repeal of Regulations. S. COMMUNICATIONS - For referral to the City Clerk for inclusion in the records: (a) Copy of letter from (CASA) Citizens Against Santiago Airport. (b) Copy of letter regarding Chester M. Rudnucki declaring that he is a U.S. Democratic Candidate for 1984. (c) Bulletin from United States /Mexico Sister • Cities International regarding International Photo Contest. (d) Minutes of January 12, and Preliminary Agenda of February 9, 1983, from Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission. (e) Applications before the California Public Utilities Commission; 1) #82 -12 -02/04 - Southern California Gas Company /Pacific Lighting Gas Supply Company; 2) #83 -01 -12 - Advanced Mobile Phone Service, Inc. and the Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership; and 3) #83 -02 -04 - Southern California Gas Company. 6. CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES - For denial and (36) confirmation of the City Clerk's referral to the claims adjuster: (a) Al Aguinaga, dba Gentry Hair Salon, for Aguinaga/ reimbursement of lost appointments Gentry Hair alleging he was not advised of water Salon shut -off on January 11, 1983, at 320 N. Coast Highway. • Volume 37 - Page 62 • • • MINUTES February 14, 1983 (b) Consolidated Reproductions for property damage, alleging vehicle struck by City refuse truck at Pacific Coast Highway and Jasmine Street on January 3, 1983. (c) Paul Edward Coppen for reimbursement of sun glasses not returned to him following arrest by Police Department on January 29, 1983. (d) Roy E. Hokanson for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of road construction sign falling onto sidewalk at Pacific Coast Highway, near McDonalds Restaurant: on January 30, 1983. (e) John Reedy for personal injuries as a result of accident at intersection of Irvine and 19th Street, at Dover Drive on October 13, 1982, alleging obstruction of view caused by six -foot wall around Fire Department: building. (f) St. Andrews Village Condo Association Application for Leave to Present Late Claim, for property damage, alleging City Utilities Department backed backhoe into garage at 497 St. Andrews Place during repair of water lines in June 1982. (g) Paul Wheeler for alleged property damage as a result of boat dock floating to other side of marina, thereby flooding engine and damaging whaler boat on November 30, 1982 at the Balboa Yacht Basin. (h) John L. Blom Photography, for alleged property damage /business loss as a result of sewer overflow accumulation at 3040 E. Pacific Coast Highway on November 9, 1982. Rejected - Not timely filed: (i) Arthur C. Butler, Jr., for reimbursement of cost for professional services and filing fees connected with Court Case No. 31- 86 -17, 'Loftis vs. City of Newport Beach in August, 1982 (stemming from employment with City as Police Officer) (j) Shawn M. McGrath for alleged personal injuries, property damage and false arrest as a result of traffic collision at Irvine Avenue and intersection with private road on May 29, 1982. Volume 37 - Page 63 0 Consld Repr Coppen Hokanson Reedy St. Andrews Village C/A Wheeler Blom Photography Butler, Jr. McGrath ,ItlV A 7. SUKKONS AND COMPLAINTS - For denial and confirmation of the City Clerk's referral to • the claims adjuster: (a) Karl Gray and Alan Spann, Orange County Gray & Superior Court, Case No. 39- 39 -69. Claims Spann were filed with the City on July 1, 1980. (b) Michael Murray Thomas, Orange County Thomas Superior Court, Case No. .39- 40 -61. A Notice of Intention to Commence Action was filed with the City Clerk on October 15, 1982. B. REQUEST TO FILL PERSONNEL VACANCIES - For (66) approval: (Report from the City Manager) (a) One Groundsman- Gardener I, Parks, Beaches and Recreation. (b) One Assistant City Attorney, City Attorney's Office. 9. STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS - For Council information and approval: (a) Report from the City Manager regarding Audits /S &M CONTRACT COMPLIANCE AUDITS C -2254 (SIMONIS- MORELAND). (38) (b) Report from Parks, Beaches and Recreation PB &R /Srpls • Director :regarding SURPLUS CAPITAL OUTLAY FUNDS. Cptl Fads (62) (c) Removed from the Consent Calendar. (d) STATUS REPORT- -COAST HIGHWAY WIDENING Drft EIR/ DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT from Coast H'wy Public Works Department). Wdng (74) (e) Report from City Attorney regarding AIRPORT LEGAL SERVICES ESTIMATE FROM JWyn Arpt/ O'DONNELL AND GORDON (C- 2331). Sry i38 ) (f) Removed from the Consent Calendar. 10. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULING: None. 11. USE PERMIT 197:3 -- SMITH'S FOOD KING SHOPPING U/P 1973 CENTER - Approve an entry agreement allowing (88) the City to enter onto the property located at 3100 Balboa Boulevard to connect into an existing parking lot storm drain with City alley drain. (Report from Public Works) • Volume 37 - Page 64 • MINUTES February 14, 1983 12. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8725 - Approve two new Tr 8725 subdivision agreements guaranteeing completion of the traffic signal construction at the intersection of Spyglass Hill Road and San Miguel Drive, and at the intersection of Ford Road and San Miguel Drive as required of Tentative Tract 8725; authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the two agreements; and accept the Ford Road improvements constructed in conjunction with Tentative Tract No. 8725; and authorize the City Clerk to (a) release the Faithful Performance surety and (b) Labor and Materials surety (Bonds No. 2614178) in six months provided no claims have been filed. (Report from Public Works) 13. RESUBDIVISION 110. 681 - Approve a subdivision Resub 681 agreement guaranteeing completion of the public (84) improvements required with Resubdivision 681, located at 2121. Bristol Street, on the southeasterly corner of Bristol Street and Irvine Avenue, adjacent to the Newport Heights area; and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the agreement. (Report from Public Works) 14. SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1982 -83 Swr Mn Rplcm (CONTRACT 2360) - Approve the plans and C -2360 specifications; and authorize the City Clerk to (38) advertise for bids to be opened at 11:00 a.m. on March 3, 1983. (Report from Public Works) 15. APPLICATION OF THOMAS W. BURTON - Approve Drvwy /Burton construction for 60 foot wide driveway at 504 (80) N. Newport Boulevard. (Report from Public Works) 16. SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT - Approve application JPeru #83 -002 for Newport Dunes for professional (65) fireworks display on July 4, 1983 (9 p.m. for 1 hr.). 17. BUDGET AMENDMENTS - For approval: (a) Memorandum from Finance Director regarding the following 1982 -83 Mid -Year Budget Adjustments: BA -052, $1,208,966.01 Net decrease in Unappropriated Surplus and decrease in Budget Appropriations and Revenue Estimates; General Fund. BA -053, $14,531.93 Net increase in Unappropriated Surplus and decrease in Budget Appropriations and Revenue Estimates; Park and Recreation Fund. Volume 37 - Page 65 (25) • • MINUTES February 14, 1983 IB BA -054, $1.2,515.00 Net increase in T(25) Unappropriated Surplus and decrease in Budget Appropriations and Revenue Estimates; Library Fund. BA -055, $1.57,000.00 Net decrease in Unappropriated Surplus and increase in Budget Appropriations and Revenue Estimates; Gas Tax (Section 2107) Fund. BA -056, $94,300.00 Increase in Unappropriated Surplus and decrease in Budget Appropriations and Revenue Estimates; Gas Tax (Section 2106) Fund. BA -057, $124,000.00 Increase in Unappropriated Surplus and increase in Revenue Estimates; Fines, Forfeits and Penalties Fund. BA -058, $30,545.00 Increase in Unappropriated Surplus and increase in Revenue Estimates; Parking Meter Fund. BA -059, $103,966.39 Net increase in Unappropriated Surplus and increase in Budget Appropriations and Revenue Estimates; Tide and Submerged Lands Fund. BA -060, $83,800.00 Net decrease in Unappropriated Surplus and decrease in Budget Appropriations and Revenue Estimates; Contributions Fund. BA -061, $140,941.27 Decrease in Unappropriated Surplus and increase in Budget Appropriations and decrease in Revenue Estimates; Building Excise Tax Fund. BA -062, $83,975.00 Net increase in Unappropriated Surplus and decrease in Budget Appropriations and Revenue Estimates; Water Fund. (b) BA -063, $4,500.00 Increase in Budget Appropriations for metal halide lamps to replace existing lights at Mariners Park; Park and Recreation Fund. BA -064, $5,000.00 Increase in Budget Appropriations and Revenue Estimates for construction of two entry signs; Park and Recreation Fund. Volume 37 - Page 66 COUMCIL Ms M_ February 14, 1983 MINUTES M G. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Proposed resolution approving rules and Newspaper • regulations promulgated by the Chief of Police Rack Regs regarding newspaper racks and stands was (27 5 70) presented with reports from Chief of Police and City Attorney. Noel Hatch, 2365 Midwick, Altaderm;_ Attorney representing the publication, "USA Today," addressed the 'Council in support of the blue and white news racks used by them. The City Attorney explained that the initial request for the news racks used by the publication were approved, with the understanding that they would look like all the other racks, i.e., dark in appearance and they would not have unusual characteristics. Once the racks were installed and the Police Department noticed that they were not in conformance, thus the proposed regulations. Lt. Petersen, from the Police Department, addressed the Council, stating that the blue and white racks were approved in conformance with an existing ordinance. The change in regulations, as proposed, is to offset a proliferation of various kinds of news racks in the City. on x Motion was made! to refer the resolution to staff for further research, and that it be Ayes brought back for adoption on February 28, 1983. 2. Report from Mayor Hart concerning proposed JWyn Arpt/ ORANGE COUNTY LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES Impvm RESOLUTION, was presented. (54) Motion x Motion was made to accept the revised wording All Ayes on the proposed resolution. 3. The City Manager addressed the Council, stating Ord 83 -14 that the proposed ordinance amending provisions Newspaper of Chapter 5.70 regarding maintenance /removal Rack Mntnc of newspaper racks in the City, since the (27 b 70) printing of the agenda, was structured to take effect immediately, therefore it becomes an 00urgency" ordinance, and is, therefore, being presented for introduction and adoption. Report from the City Attorney, was presented. Motion x Motion was made to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 83 -14, Urgency All Ayes being,. AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF Ord 83 -14 NEWPORT BEACH AMENDING PORTIONS OF SECTION 5.70.060 OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL OF NEWSPAPER RACKS IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. • Volume 37 •- Page 67 • Motion All Ayes Motion All Ayes • Motion All Ayes • X x x s ffid, MINUTES 14, 1983 4. The City Manager addressed the Council, stating that the recommendations made by the Technical Oil Advisory Committee, as presented in their Minutes of January 27, 1983, will be followed by staff, and the necessary documents to bid the operation in the manner of the consulting engineer's contract, will be brought back to Council. Motion was made to receive and approve the MINUTES OF THE TECHNICAL OIL ADVISORY COMMITTEE, dated January 27, 1983, as presented. H. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION: 1. ORDINANCE NO. 83 -11, being, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DESIGNATING THE SECTION OF BAYSIDE DRIVE FROM EAST COAST HIGHWAY TO EL PASEO DRIVE AS A 35 MPH ZONE, presented for second reading and adoption, with report from Traffic Engineer, dated January 24, 1983. Motion was made! to adopt Ordinance No. 83 -11. I. CONTINUED BUSINESS: Technical Oil Adv (24) Ord 83 -11 Tfk /Bayside Dr -E1 Paseo (85) 1. Appointments to the Citizens Advisory CAC Committees for a one -year term expiring (24) December 31, 1983 (appointed by Council upon recommendation of each Council Member). Memorandum dated January 10, 1983 from City Clerk regarding remaining appointments or reappointments, was presented to Council. Motion was made to confirm the following: Bicycle Trails Citizens Advisory Committee �BT /CAC (District 1) Council Member Strauss's remaining appointment deferred to March 14, 1983. (District 4) Council Member Heather's remaining appointment deferred to March 14, 1983. (District 7) Council Member Cox's appointment deferred to March 14, 1983. Citizens Traffic Advisory Committee CTAC (District 3) Mayor Hart's appointment of Douglas Harrington. Volume 37 - Page 68 • Motion x Motion x All Ayes All Ayes too n All Ayes Motion All Ayes Motion All Ayes in x x X MINUTES 14, 1983 I. CONTINUED BUSINESS: 2. Resolution establishing the Ad Hoc Steering Committee for the Regional Urban Design Assist Team (R /UDAT), was presented. Motion was made to adopt Resolution 83 -20, as amended (appointment of three Council Members, instead of two). A straw vote indicated unanimous concurrence by the Council for the amendment to appoint three Council Members to the R /UDAT Ad Hoc Steering Committee, vs. two, and adopted Resolution 83 -20. The following appointments were confirmed: Council Member Heather Council Member Plummer Council Member Strauss Planning Commissioner Jerry King Planning Director Jim Hewicker Bill Blurock, Architect Tom Moon, Architect John Curci, Business Person Bill Frederickson, Business Person William R. Hamilton, Newport Harbor Chamber Commerce Ad Hoc R /UDAT Cmte (24) Res 83 -20 3. Resolution establishing an Ad Hoc Councilmanic Ad Hoc Rdstrg Redistricting Committee, was presented. Cmte (24) Motion was made to adopt Resolution No. 83 -21, and the following appointments were confirmed: Res 83 -21 Council Member Agee Council Member Cox Mayor Pro Tem Maurer 4. Resolution establishing an Ad Hoc Election d Hoc Elctn Procedure Review Committee, was presented. Prcdr Gmte, (24) Motion was made to adopt Resolution No. 83 -22, and appoint the following: Rea 83 -22 Council Member Heather Mayor Pro Tem Maurer Council Member Strauss Robert Burnham, City Attorney Judge Calvin Schmidt, Resident 1. BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES. Mayor Pro Tem Maurer presented the following nominations for consideration, with one to be appointed on February 28, 1983, to fill the unexpired term of Thomas Edwards, ending June 30, 1984: F. Holley Wilkinson Gordon Glass Volume 37 - Page 69 (24) Bd rr. - 1 n A Aye Motion All Ay El Motion All Ay, 0 MINUTES February 14. 1983 INDEX 2. ARTS COMMISSION. Arts Cmsn (24) X Motion was made to accept the following es nominations for consideration with one to be appointed on February 28, 1983, to fill the unexpired term of Bill Agee ending June 30, 1985: Pattie -Gene Sampson Ervin Pashley, Jr. 3. Report from the Parks, Beaches and Recreation PBSR /Bk -Ft Director regarding BIKE AND FOOT RACES, was Races presented. (62) The City Manager addressed the Council stating that the proposed Council Policy should give the City more management and control of the races, which addresses the unfavorable responses that were received by the City several months ago. X Motion was made to approve adoption of the Cit Cncl Plcy 's Council Policy I -21, requiring all races on I -21 public streets to be co- sponsored by the City through the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department. K. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: X 1. Motion was made to reconsider Use Permit 3011 U/P 3011 x x x x with a public hearing and City Council review x x x scheduled for ]February 28, 1983, and to waive the City's processing fees. 2. The City Manager addressed the Council, Amus Dve presenting a proposed resolution for adoption, Bus Lic /Rgs establishing an investigation fee for amusemen (27) devices, as required by ordinance. X Motion was made to adopt Resolution No. 83 -23, Res 83 -23 es establishing $75.00 as the standard investigation application processing fee. The meeting adjourned at 11:04 p.m. 22 2C Mayor OF ATT T: City Clerk Volume 37 - Page 70