Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/26/1988 - Adjourned Regular MeetingCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COUNCIL MEMBERS �G C y �® 3 ADJOURNED /REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING p G 4p� PLACE: Council Chambers TIME: 6:00 P.M. 'ALL p DATE: September 26, 1988 Dent Motion All Ayes Motion All Ayes Motion All Ayes x x x x x x x x x x MINUTES Mayor Cox presented a Proclamation to Linda L. Kinkade, South Region Campaign Chairperson, stating that the month of October, 1988 is United Way Month. A. ROLL CALL. B. Reading of Minutes of Meeting of September 12, 1988, was waived, approved as written, and ordered filed. C. Reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions under consideration was waived, and City Clerk was directed to read by tittles only. ' D. HEARINGS: 1. Mayor Cox opened the public hearing IOrd 88 -34 regarding proposed ORDINANCE NO. 88 -34, PCA 668 being, 16 Harbor Is AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF (94) THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AMENDING A PORTION OF DISTRICTING MAP NO. 23 TO DESIGNATE A BAYSIDE FRONT YARD SETBACK ACROSS LOT 16, TRACT NO. 802, LOCATED AT NO. 16 HARBOR ISLAND DRIVE, WHICH WILL BE MAINTAINED AS A REQUIRED FRONT YARD [PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENT NO. 6681 was presented for second reading with report from the Planning Department. The City Clerk advised that after the agenda was printed, a letter was receiving from the Harbor Island Community Association stating they had no objection to the proposed ordinance. A map was displayed depicting the existing and proposed setbacks for the subject site. Hearing no one wishing to address the Council, the public hearing was closed. Motion was made to adopt Ordinance No. 88 -34, amending a portion of Districting Map No.23„ 2. Mayor Cox opened the public hearing regarding request of REGIS CONTRACTORS INC., Newport Beach for - Volume 42 - Page 357 Tract 11937 (R) /Tfc Stdy COUNCIL MEMBERS • f • • CITY-OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES September 26, 19'88 A. TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 50 Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the construction of a 138 unit residential condominium development on property located at 1200 East Coast Highway, in the Villa Point Planned Community; M� B. VESTING TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 11937 (Revised) Request to revise a previously approved Tentative Map of Tract No. 11937 which permitted the subdi- vision of 26.9 acres of land into two lots for residential condominium development and a residual parcel not for development. The proposed revision to the tentative map includes a request to approve the subdivision as a Vesting Tentative Map, delete Lot 2 from the proposed subdivision and reduce the number of dwelling units from 154 to 138; WN C. COASTAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 9 (Amended) Request to amend a previously approved residential coastal development permit which established the affordable housing requirements for the Villa Point Residential Condominium Development. The proposed amendment involves a request to amend the conditions for affordable housing within the subject project. Report from the Planning Department, was presented. Letter from The Irvine Company in support of the Planning Commission recommendation, and the Villa Point Apartments project, was presented. The City Manager outlined the proposed project as set forth in the staff report. Dave Dmohowski of The Irvine Company, addressed the Council and stated that they are in agreement with the Volume 42 - Page 358 11937 C J • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COUNCIL MEMBERS .s� � September 26, 19138 conditions of approval recommended by the Planning Commission, except for one condition dealing with affordable housing. He stated the Commission recommended that 20% of the 138 dwelling units be affordable to low income households for a period of 20 years. They felt that this requirement is far more stringent than any previous conditions imposed on their company, and as an alternative, they are proposing that 20% of the units be affordable to low -and moderate- income households for a period of 1.5 years as follows: "That 20% of the total number of units be made available to low -and moderate - income families for a period of 15 years. 10% of the total number of units shall be made available to low- income families (80% of County median income), and may be provided off -site at the Baywood Apartments at the developer's option. 10% of the total number of units shall be made available to moderate income families (100% of County median income), and be provided on- site." Mr. Dmohowski explained the reasons for their proposing the above alternate, as enumerated in their letter to the City Council dated September 20, 1988. Council Member Strauss spoke in support of the 20 year affordable period, and indicated he would not favor decreasing the term to 15 years as requested. Council Member Maurer stated that he generally prefers the longer period of affordability; however, in this particular instance, he favors 15 years rather than 20 years as recommended by the Planning Commission. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Hart, Mr. Dmohowski stated that it is their intent to develop and manage this project as a rental project indefinitely. If they desired to change the project to a condominium conversion, City Council approval is; needed. Referring to the affordable housing issue, Council Member Turner pointed out that in this particular project, the City is not: granting any density bonus to the developer, and he felt it was not Volume 42 - Page 359 t 11937 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COUNCIL MEMBERS �G9 �G y4P c+Of � s9 �9G September 26, 1988 Motion x Ayes x x x x Noes x x on Ayes x Motion All Ayes • x equitable to place such a large burden on the property owner. He felt that the affordable period of 15 years was a reasonable request, inasmuch as all the subsidy is directly coming from the property owner, and emphasized that no city, country, federal or state funds are being contributed to this project. In response: to Council Member Plummer, the City Manager reviewed the procedure for monitoring affordable housing tenants. Sid Soffer;, 900 Arbor Street, Costa Mesa, addressed the Council and indicated his support of The Irvine Company to change the affordable period to 15 years. Hearing no others wishing to address the Council, the public hearing was closed. Motion was made to straw -vote the affordable housing issue, and approve ten percent (10X) of the units to be provided at the Baywood Apartments, and ten percent (10 %) on -site. Motion was made to straw -vote that all of the affordable housing for this project (low and medium) be switched to the Baywood Apartments for an affordable period of twenty (20) years. Motion was made to approve Traffic Study No. 50, Vesting Tentative Map of Tract No. 11937 (Revised), and Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9 (Amended), subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval as recommended by the Planning Commission, with the exception that the affordable housing condition be changed to reflect that all twenty -eight (28) affordable units will be relocated to the Baywood Apartments for a period of twenty (20) years. 3. Mayor Cox opened the public hearing regarding VESTING RESUBDIVISION NO. 880, a request of THE IRVINE COMPANY, Newport Beach, to approve a vesting resubdivision so as to create six numbered parcels for office development and parking, and one lettered parcel for off - street: parking and circulation purposes, where eight parcels currently exist on property located at 6 thru 11, 19 and 20 Corporate Plaza, in the CORPORATE PLAZA PLANNED COMMUNITY. Volume 42 - Page 360 (84) 11937 880 COUNCIL MEMBERS 1.00 • Motion All Ayes • r Li x CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 26, 1988 Report from the Planning Department, was presented. David Neish of Urban Assist, Inc., representing The Irvine Company, addressed the Council in support of the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve their request. He stated this project was approved some years ago, but never completed. It is now their intention to complete the development and vest the tentative map to insure that the project can be completed with all of the conditions of approvals that were previously required. Hearing no others wishing to address the Council, the public hearing was closed. Motion was made to approve Vesting Resubdivision No. 880, incorporating by reference the Findings and Conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. HE 4. Mayor Cox opened the public hearing and U/P 3317 City Council review of an appeal by SAID (88) SHOKRIAN, Corona del Mar, from the unanimous denial by the Planning Commission on August 18, 1988, of - A. TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 48 Request the acceptance of a traffic study so as to allow the construction of a 23,593± sq. ft. (gross) retail - office building in the "Retail Service Commercial" area of the Mariners' Mile Specific Plan which includes a request to override the requirement of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. The proposal also includes the acceptance of an Environmental Document; AND B. USE PERMIT NO. 3317 Permit the construction of a 23,593± sq. ft, retail- office building on property located in the "Retail and Service Commercial" area of the Mariners' Mile Specific Plan. The proposal includes a request to exceed the allowable gross structural area of .5 times the buildable area of the site; a request to exceed the 26 foot basic height limit in the 26/35 Foot Height Limitation District; and a request for a modification to the Volume 42 - Page 361 Trfc Stdy 1148 COUNCIL MEMBERS *A • • • 1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 26, 1988 Zoning; Code so as to allow the use of compact parking; AND C. VESTING RESUBDIVISION NO. 876 Request to approve a vesting resubdivision so as to resubdivide two existing parcels of land into a single! parcel for commercial development on property located at 2912 and 2930 West Coast Highway, in the "Retail Service Commercial" area of the Mariners' Mile Specific Plan. Report from the Planning Department, was presented. Appeal application from Said Shokrian, was presented. Letter from the Balboa Bay Club President, Thomas G. Deemer, in support of the subject project, was presented. The City Manager advised that subsequent to the denial by the Planning Commission, this project has been significantly modified, and presented three options for consideration: 1) Review the.revised plan at this time; 2) Continue the public hearing to another date; or 3) Refer the item back to the Planning Commission to conduct Site Plan Review. Brion Jeannette, architect for the appellant, addressed the Council and stated it is their request that this hearing be continued to October 24 in order to clarify some of the Council's concerns. He briefly outlined the revised project and stated that the structure now meets the requirements of the Traffic: Phasing Ordinance. Discussion ensued, wherein the Planning Director adlvised that if the revised project is referred back to the Planning Commission, it will not be necessary for the development to be approved by the City Council unless it is appealed, or called up for public hearing by the Council. Volume 42 - Page 362 876 COUNCIL MEMBERS a \�� is Motion All Ayes r �i C x CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 26, 1988 Brion Jeannette stated that he had no objection to going back before the Planning Commission; however, it would be his desire to bring the revised plan to the City Council, inasmuch as the decision of the Planning Commission could be appealed. Hearing no others wishing to address the Council, motion was made to continue this public: hearing to October 24, 1888. 5. Mayor Cox opened the public hearing and City Council review of an appeal of GRACE RESTAURANT COMPANY, Irvine, from the unanimous approval by the Planning Commission on August 4, 1988 of USE PERMIT NO. 1942 (AMENDED) being a request to amend a previously approved use permit which permitted a change in operational. characteristics of an existing COCO'S RESTAURANT located at 2305 East Coast Highway, Corona del Mar, so as to add the incidental service of on -sale beer and wine. The proposed amendment includes a request to change the facility to a 24 hour coffee shop, whereas the: existing use permit limits the hours of operation from 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. daily; request to delete the previous Condition No. 1, which required a recorded off -site parking agreement be approved by the City Council, guaranteeing that a minimum of 23 parking spaces be provided for the restaurant use on property located at 2239 -2247 East Coast Highway; and including exceptions to the Sign Code so as to permit an off -site restaurant identification sign on a parking lot site located at 2239 -2247 East Coast Highway, together with two roof signs. The application would not propose to increase the "net public area" of the restaurant. Report from the Planning Department, was presented. Appeal Application from Grace Restaurant Company, was presented. Letter from David G. Dill in opposition to the subject restaurant's appeal for change of hours of operation, was presented. Volume: 42 - Page 363 (88) 1942(4) COUNCIL MEMBERS �G4►��G4A� �t �9G • Motion All Ayes LJ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH El September 26, 1988 The City Clerk advised that after the /P 1942(A) agenda was printed, a letter was received from the applicant requesting withdrawal of their appeal, and stating it is their intention to proceed with their development in compliance with the conditions of approval imposed by the Planning Commission on August 4, 1988. Council Member Sansone stated that it was his intention to call this item up before the Council, but later learned it had already been appealed by Grace Restaurant. He stated that the major objections of the residents in Corona del'Mar to the proposed use are as follows: 1) Approval of the sign variance; 2) .Juke -Box music in each individual booth; 3) Increased traffic on Acacia Avenue; 4) Lack of an agreement for off -site parking. Council Member Sansone stated that in view of these concerns, he would suggest the applicant meet with the residents in the area in hopes of working out a compromise,, particularly since the use permit is subject to review by the City at anytime. Motion was made to accept the letter of withdrawal from Grace Restaurant dated September 26, 1988. 6. Mayor Cox opened the public hearing CDBG /Grnte regarding *MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK Prfmc Rpt GRANT PROGRAM GRANTEE PERFORMANCE FV 88/g8 REPORT - FY 1987 -1988. (87) Report from the Planning Department, was presented. The City Manager advised that the purpose of this hearing is to confirm the amount of entitlement funds that were spent in 1987 -88 for housing, social services, fait housing and administration. Volume: 42 - Page 364 COUNCIL MEMBERS Motion . Ayes • x CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES September 26, 1988 Hearing no one wishing to address the Council the public hearing was closed. Motion was made to authorize the City Manager to transmit the 1987 -88 Grantee Performance: Report to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 7. Mayor Cox opened the public hearing regarding: A. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -1(A) and These amendments involve major revisions to the Land Use and Circulation Elements of the Newport Beach General Plan. The proposed revisions to the Land Use Element involve establishment of various densities and intensities of development citywide. The revisions to the Circulation Element include modifications to the City's adopted Master Platt of Arterial Highways, as well as a reevaluation of the necessary roadway improvements and funding sources available to the City of Newport Beach. B. LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 13 Amendments to the Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan to conform its provisions with respect to permitted land uses to the Land Use Element of the General Plan. GPA 87 -1(A & E) (45) LCPA#13 C. MINOR REVISIONS TO THE RECREATION AND R /OS /Housg OPEN SPACE ELEMENT AND HOUSING ELEMENT - Elmt of the City of Newport Beach General Plan in order to ensure consistency with the Land Use Element. Report from the Planning Department, was presented. The City Clark advised that after the agenda was printed, the following documents were received: 1) Letter from St. James Episcopal Church regarding the proposed "down classification" of their property at 3209 Via Lido; Volume 42 - Page 365 COUNCIL MEMBERS A N\ S � CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 26, 1988 LHZT K�v 2) Letter from Jack W. Mullan, 2031 Mesa Drive, regarding the proposed classification of Birch Street /Mesa Drive from • Irvine Avenue to Bristol Street in the Circulation Element; 3) Petition from residents of Sea View Homes regarding the Proposed Ford /San Miguel connection to the San Joaquin (.fills Corridor; and 4) Petition from various residents opposed to the extension of San Joaquin Hills Road beyond Pelican Hill Road. Robert Lenard, Advance Planning Manager, summarized the staff report noting that the General. Plan Amendment was initiated in February, 1987. He stated that the meetings conducted in connection with the General. Plan Outreach Program served as a base for the recommended plan. The Planning Commission held five public hearings on the plan, and at those meetings everyone who wished to testify was heard. Mr. Lenard referred to the documents prepared in. connection with the General Plan Amendment, as enumerated in the staff report; noted the illustrations on display, and described the proposed changes to the General Plan. It was noted in the staff report that "the major focus of the General Plan Update has been to balance the existing and future development allowed by the Land Use Element with the transportation system contemplated by the Circulation Element and the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. Recognizing that the transportation system itself', as well as growth in commercial and residential development, was an issue of community concern, land use alternatives were emphasized which would minimize the need to make • major revisions to the City's proposed circulation system. Consequently the proposed General Plan significantly reduces commercial growth in the City. Volume 42 - Page 366 87 -1(A& COUNCIL MEMBERS *A ti E • E CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 26, 15188 "Maximum future commercial . development under the existing General Plan and Zoning (which assumes FAR's as high as 2.0 in some areas) could be as high as 26.9 million square feet within the existing City boundary. The proposed Plan reduces future growth to a maximum of 7.4 million square feet. This represents a 19.5 million square foot (72X) reduction in future commercial growth. It,is important to emphasize that both of these figures assume a worst case, in that all existing uses are projected to redevelop at the absolute maximums allowed by the General Plan and Zoning. "The only other comprehensive City actions with respect to growth of a similar magnitude that have been undertaken since the adoption of the General Plan in the early 1970's, were GPA 78 -2 and GPA 79 -1. The combined effect of these two amendments was a 6.2 million square foot reduction in commercial growth and a 1,500 dwelling unit reduction in residential growth. The proposed General Plan represents a significant change for the future of the City. It should be pointed out that the driving force in the preparation of the revised Plans has been to insure the "correlation" required by State law between land use and circulation, and attempting to balance the interests of all the residents, property owners, and business people that make up the community." In response to Council Member Turner, Mr. Lenard described the criteria used in determining the various minimum lot sizes, and discussed the proposed widening and realignment of Mesa Drive to four lanes in the Santa Ana Heights area. Council Member Sansone asked that when there are incompatibilities between the City's Circulation Element and those of adjoining cities or the County, who has the ultimate authority to say "what its going to be." volume 42 - Page 367 87 -1(A& COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 26, 15188 In response! to the above, the Public Works Director replied that the ultimate authority its to a Circulation Element within a given jurisdiction, lies with • that jurisdiction. If there is incompatibility between the City's Master Plan and that of the County of Orange, and possibly other adjacent cities, that could lead to the City being declared ineligible to participate in the County Arterial Highway Financing Program. fie further noted that the County has an established procedure with the cities in the County in an attempt to resolve incompatibility between the arterial highway system, and that some incompatibilities have been identified, but have not been addressed. It was noted by Mr. Lenard that the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways has been drawn to include links that are outside the City, as well as outside the City's Sphere of Influence. In response! to Council Member Strauss's question regarding the proposal to connect San Joaquin Hills Road to the San Joaquin Hills Transportation • Corridor, Mr. Lenard advised that the Planning Commission took their action recognizing that the City Council had already previously took an opposite position, but due to updated information given to the Commission on this subject, and public testimony, they reached the subject recommendation. Hearing no other comments from the Council at this time, the Mayor requested that those wishing to address the Council on the Residential component of the Land Use Plan to step forward. Angel Kraemer Kleinbub, owner of 3114 W. ocean Front, stated that it is her intention to demolish the existing structure at the above address, and construct a duplex on the site. She has invested a considerable amount of money and time in the design of the building; and just recently found out that due to their lot size of 25 x 90, and the proposed revision, they will be unable to proceed with their plans. She • requested the Council grant her a grace period, or that she be exempt from the proposed amendment. Volume 42 - Page 368 87 -1(A& COUNCIL MEMBERS 2 y r -'G�3^"G�-% of9G • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 26, 11188 Mr. Lenard stated that the Planning Commission;, in proposing to change the standards, which were originally proposed as 2,400 sq. ft., took a look at the distribution of lots that were between 2,000 sq. ft. and 2,400 sq. ft., which was Initially proposed, and found that the largest grouping of lots was in the category of 2,375 sq. ft. The City Attorney noted that if the above project was already under construction, or if a building permit has been issued prior to approval of this General Plan Amendment, the development: would be vested. Charles P. Pigneri, 1131 E. Balboa Boulevard, stated that he has two 2,250 sq. ft. vacant lots and would like to construct a duplex. His plans have already been approved in concept by the City and submitted to the Coastal Commission. He has invested to date, approximately $4,000, and if he has to build a single- family dwelling on the lots due to the proposed revision of requiring 2,375 sq. ft. per lot, the homes will be adjacent to commercial zoning which he does not favor. Dick Demmer, 2812 Cliff Drive stated he supports the subdivision alternative of a 10,000 sq. ft. lot size for the south side of Cliff Drive, which he felt was in keeping with the other properties along Kings Road, as well as other areas of the cities where there are coastal bluffs. He: also requested that the City Council makes sure that every element of the General. Plan is specific in writing, and that color designations on the maps are correct: and complete so that there are no "misinterpretations" of the plan. Fred West, 419 Loyola Way, Placentia, representing Lucy Stafford, owner of 3510 Lake, stated that Ms. Stafford has a lot with 2,250 sq. ft. and two units . which she would like to demolish and rebuild, but cannot proceed with the plans due to the proposal that the lot must be at least 2,375 sq. ft, for a duplex. Mr. West expressed his opposition to the proposed amendment, stating it would cause a negative impact not only on Ms. Stafford, but several other property owners in the City. He stated the amendment would, in essence, be "spot zoning." and he:.felt this was not good planning. volume: 42 - Page 369 87 -1(A& COUNCIL MEMBERS \II\N\ • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 26, 1988 Lucille Stafford, 3510 Lake Avenue, stated she would like to rebuild two units that would be more consistent with the City's building code and also be able to have two garages. She stated that she is looking to retire on a fixed income and was counting on the rental properties to supplement her income. Carol Martin, 1824 W. Ocean Front, requested clarification of reference to land use patterns in the Land Use Element document for Balboa Peninsula. She stated that she owns three lots (3,600 sq. ft. each) with R -4 zoning. Mr. Lenard responded that the particular block where Ms. Martin owns property is one of the blocks that is being suggested for change in land use from multi - family, which is permitted under the existing General. Plan and allows one unit per 800 sq. ft. of land area. Under the proposed plan, two family developments would be permitted with duplexes on each of the lots. Walter Smith, 206 Pearl Avenue, Balboa Island staged that due to the number of garages being converted to living space on the Island, parking has become a serious problem, and he would hope the City Council would direct the staff to investigate:. Hal Woods, owner of property on Cliff Drive, referred to Attachment No. 2 of the staff report, which designates Cliff Drive Subdivision Alternatives, and stated he felt the proposed 10,000 sq. ft. lot size was not fair or equitable, and would tic grossly unjust for the City to impose nn the property owners on Cliff Drive. He was supportive of the 7,000 sq. ft. alternative. Louise Greeley, 16 Swift Court, suggested that building rights for the 154 units designated for the CalTrans West property be transferred to Newport Center or the Airport area so that the CalTrans West property can remain open space. Elizabeth Helmer, owner of 109 28th Street, stated she would like to convert her property to a duplex as she has 2,375 sq. ft.; however, she empathizes with the other property owners who do Volume 42 - Page 370 87 -1(A& 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COUNCIL MEMBERS S \LL\9� Ct t1S9 9 9G� 77�� %JAG September 26, 1988 MINUTES not meet the proposed lot size for duplexes, and would hope the Council can resolve the cases where the property owner has already invested funds for an architect and plans, etc. Marco Baljr_u, owner of 2953 Cliff Drive, referenced the proposed Subdivision Alternatives for Cliff Drive and stated he would like to see the 5,000 sq. ft. lot size remain, but he could live with the proposed 7,000 sq. ft. alternative. Dr. Jan Vandersloot, 2221 16th Street, spoke in support of "down- zoning" some of the areas of the City; however, he was not supportive of "up- zoning" the area south of the bluff on Cliff Drive in Newport Heights. He felt that the low- density residential classification should remain, and would like the staff to analyze the bluff area from Santa Ana Avenue to Riverside Avenue to determine if the area is indeed a coastal bluff. William Martin, 1824 W. Ocean Front, spoke in opposition to "down- zoning" certain areas on the Peninsula. He also discussed uncontrolled growth and increased traffic as it relates to the Peninsula. Mr. Lenard advised the Council that the staff is doing a parcel -by- parcel land use inventory of the residential properties on the Peninsula, and by the next Council meeting, estimates can be provided with projected differences as to what is in the existing General Plan and what is being proposed. Gail Demmer, 2812 Cliff Drive, representing Newport Heights Community Association, complimented the City Council on the Citizen General Plan Outreach Program, and expressed appreciation for public participation in the program. She stated it 1s the association's recommendation to support the "no subdivision" of lot, which would result in additional dwelling units in their area. With regard to the south side of Cliff Drive, they recommend a minimum lot size of 10,000 sq. ft. in order to maintain the low- density classification. Volume 42 - Page 371 87 -1(A& COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 26, 1988 Volume 42 - Page 372 E) 87 -1(A& The following persons addressed the Council at this time regarding Commercial standards: Eric Welton, 2855 E. Coast Highway, • stated he supported the "overall thrust" of the proposed changes to the General Plan; however, he was concerned with the recommendation to change 2 x to .5, which he felt was somewhat "radical." He also felt the proposal was below the level of economic feasibility and urged that an economic evaluation be made before final approval. Dan Daniels, representing Ardell Investment Company, discussed the proposed floor area ratios, and covered parking included in those ratios along Mariners' Mile. He stated that Mariners' Mile is one area in the City that is "being hit from all sides," and in his opinion, the City cannot reduce floor area ratios, height, increase visual open space and end up with an economic project, because at some point the property becomes nonusable. He suggested that if the floor area ratio is going to be reduced from .8 to .5, • then the allowed uses become minimal. With regard to the issue of including covered parking in the calculation of floor area ratio, he felt it would be a step "backward." Tom Levyn, 10801 National Boulevard, Los Angeles, representing Lido Marina Village, discussed the proposal to include parking in the floor area ratio calculations. He stated that Lido Marina Village intends to upgrade its development, and inclusion of parking in the floor area ratio would prevent them from proceeding. He suggested that Lido Marina Village be added as an exclusion to the proposed requirement, or delete the proposal in its entirety. He also mentioned that they intend to build a parking structure on their lot on 32nd Street. Frank Trane, representing St. James Episcopal Church, 3209 Via Lido, referred to their letter of this date, and spoke in opposition to "down- zoning" the church property. He stated that • they felt the proposed "down- zoning" would decrease the value of the commercial zoning, if,and when they sold or borrowed against the property. Volume 42 - Page 372 E) 87 -1(A& • 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COUNCIL MEMBERS s � �G9�, G 4P�, 'ALLY � September 26, 1988 MINUTES George Baker, 434 N. Newport Boulevard (between Hoag Hospital and 15th Street), stated he did not feel his particular area should be "grouped with the most overcrowded sections of the City" in the proposed amendment. He stated that the proposed regulations would hurt property owners who would like to remove old structures and rebuild, and it would create a hardship in a very small area. Gail Demmer, 2812 Cliff Drive, representing Newport Heights Community Association, stated that they are in support of the .5 floor area ratio for Mariners' Mile. She stated that their association considers the harbor and ocean the most valuable natural resource that they have to the scenic view parks in their residential community. She emphasized that they are "thrilled" with the .5 floor area ratio, including parking. Sid Soffer„ 900 Arbor Street, Costa Mesa, discussed the interpretation of a "trip end" in referencing his remarks to trip generation examples for a Mini -Mart, as set forth in the staff report. He also questioned staff if they could name a project, which has been completed, where the staff has followed up to determine if that project actually accumulated the trips the staff projected it would, prior to that project being built. Mr. Lenard„ in response to some of the comments made by various speakers, stated the following: "With regard to validating trip generation rates, the City does periodically review its trip generation rates used for traffic modeling and traffic studies to make auto that what is contained in 'the book' is realistic. "Regarding the St. James Episcopal Church property, the issue was addressed at the Planning Commission level, and the proposals in the plan with respect to most institutional uses City -wide, has been to change all the properties that are currently zoned and designated for other types of more intense commercial use to Governmental Educational and Volume 42 - Page 373 E) 87 -1(A& COUNCIL MEMBERS 1 �G mot' S' �O �y,\ • . • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 26, 1988 Institutional Facilities and to establish 'FAR' (floor area ratio) at very low intensities recognizing the tendencies to build at the lower 'FAR' for those types of uses. "Concerning the Lido Marina Village parking garage, the existing 'FAR' of the commercial use, is fairly close to .5, so that under the proposed plan, because parking structures would be counted in the 'FAR," no substantial growth would be allowed within the Village. "With respect to Old Newport Boulevard, under the proposed plan, growth is very limited. Under the existing zoning at 2 x buildable, there could be approximately one million more square feet of office use in that area if everyone were to develop the full 2.0. "Pertaining to visual open space in Mariners' Mile, the two issues being proposed for change are to lower floor area ratio, and to include above -grade covered parking, which will reduce the bulk of structures on the sites within Mariners Mile and would not be incompatible with the concept of providing view corridors and open space." The following persons addressed the Council with regard to the proposed changes in the Traffic Circulation Element: Paul Bancroft, 23 San Mateo Way, referred to Resolution No. 85 -11, which states the City's position with regard to the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor., and urged the City Council uphold the "promises" made in that document. He stated that he, as well as other property owners in their area, moved to Newport Beach because of the Council's action set forth in Resolution No. 85 -11. He requested the Council to reaffirm the provisions contained in Resolution No. 85 -11, specifically the limitation and extension of San Joaquin Hills Road beyond Pelican Hill Road. He submitted petitions containing approximately 300 signatures requesting the Council reject any extension of San Joaquin Hills Road beyond Pelican Hill Road. Volume 42 - Page 374 87 -1( ®& COUNCIL MEMBERS .s'AG • • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 26, 1988 Sandi Hoover, 4 Twin Lakes Circle, spoke against the proposed extension of San Joaquin Hills Road beyond Pelican Hill Road. She stated many children cross San Joaquin Hills Road on bicycles, skateboards, or by walking, and she does not want to see San Joaquin Hills Road made "any more dangerous than it already is." Steve Sandland, 2049 Port Brystal Circle, stated that he has spent many hours reading the Environmental Impact Report in an effort to develop what he feels is a fair and equitable position for the entire City. After reviewing the document, he noted there are other areas of the City that are "hammered" with traffic, as well as the San Joaquin Hills area. After considering all the alternatives, he felt that the fairest position is that all the residents look at all the connections to the Corridor. His home backs up to San Miguel Road and he is willing to accept a fair share of the traffic:, and would hope that residents In other areas would be willing to do the same. Discussion ensued with regard to San Miguel Road., wherein the Public Works Director advised that Resolution No. 88 -89, adopted August 22, 1988, requested that an operational study be made of San. Miguel Road designed to minimize through traffic. The connection of San Miguel Road realigned to Ford Road was not addressed in the resolution because there has not been a study. Terry Austin of Austin & Foust Associates, Consultant who prepared the Traffic Model, discussed the projected traffic volumes of the City's and the County's traffic models with regard to San Joaquin. Hills Road. He stated that the City's traffic model was derived from the County's Traffic model, but the City's model is much more refined because of a detailed land use data base and a more improved method of depicting traffic in the City. He felt the City's model is approximately four times more accurate than the County's model. With regard to San Joaquin Hills Road, the City's model indicates there will be about a 4,000 average daily traffic shift from San Joaquin Hills Road if the extension between Pelican Hill Road and the Corridor is not constructed. Volume. 42 - Page 375 *1 E) 87 -1(A& COUNCIL MEMBERS A 1\1 \IN\ • • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 26, 15188 With respect to the impact of traffic on Jamboree Road, if San Joaquin Hills Road is not extended beyond Pelican Hill Road, the Public Works Director indicated that traffic volumes would increase on Jamboree Road, MacArthur Boulevard, Ford Road, Bison Avenue, and San Miguel Road, as referenced on Page 414 of the Traffic Study. With regard) to the deletion of Culver Drive, north of the Corridor, the Public Works Director advised that other streets will be impacted as a result of that deletion; however, those traffic increases are primarily in the City of Irvine,.particularly on Sand Canyon Road, and to a lesser extent on Bonita Canyon Roadl, north of the Corridor. In response: to concerns of Council Member Plummer, Mr. Austin advised that when Pelican Hill Road is completed through to MacArthur Boulevard, it is expected that there will be a diversion of at least one -third of the trips on Coast Highway through Corona del Mar. At some time in the future, assuming some lanes have been.constructed on the Corridor, there will be a further diversion from areas such as Laguna Niguel, etc:., and the combination of both of those diversions will make the traffic through Corona del Mar somewhat lower than today. He indicated he would present additional data on the estimated traffic pattern changes for the year 2,010 at the October 10 Council meeting. Kent Jackson, 1904 Yacht Maria, referred to the petition signed by 180 residents of Sea View Homes who are concerned about the impact of additional traffic on their neighborhood streets caused by the proposed Ford Road connection to the Corridor. He stated they have a beautiful residential area and would like it maintained as such, and would like to see! a fair and equitable distribution of traffic throughout the City. He urged that the City Council protect their neighborhood and make sure that "outside" influences don't ruin their area. Judy Smith„ resident of Sea Wind, stated she would like to see a "balanced" approach taken by the Council with respect to the problem of traffic circulation in the City, and suggested Volume 42 - Page 376 GPA 87 -1(A& E) COUNCIL MEMBERS �G9 0N y� \ • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES September 26, 1988 that the Council "look at no connections or both connections" with regard to the Corridor. William J. Cecka, 1 Monterey Circle, submitted a prepared statement regarding the following: 1) Uphold the City's position in Resolution No. 85 -11 adopted three years ago pertaining to not extending San Joaquin Elills Road beyond Pelican Hill Road; 2) Uphold the recommendation of the Planning Commission to not make Marguerite into a four -lane road between 5th Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. In addition, he would favor prohibiting the conversion of any streets to one -way directions in Old Corona del Mar; 3) Investigate in the future, potential traffic problems connected with the dismissal of Harbor Day School children on San Joaquin Hills Road; and 4) Review and consider his tabular summary and comparison of ADT's (Average Daily Trips) by intersection segments along principal streets in certain sections of the City. Jack W. Mullen, 2031 Mesa Drive, Santa Ana Heights, requested that the Council delete Item 19 from the resolution proposed by the Planning Commission which reads as follows: "19.Birch Street /Mesa Drive from Irvine Avenue to Bristol Street. This project involves the realignment and widening of Mesa Drive to four lanes through the Santa Ana Heights area. Precise alignment and roadway widths have not yet been determined. This, along with Birch Street between Bristol Street and Jamboree Road should be classified as a secondary arterial road." Volume 42 - Page 377 87 -1(A& COUNCIL MEMBERS aG \0\ .w, • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES September 26, 1988 Mr. Mullan stated that the County of Orange, in cooperation with the City, is currently studying the need for the alignment, and is doing an Environmental Impact Report to determine the facts. In view of this study, he would request the Council delete Item 19 from the proposal. Fred Peterson, 20361 Birch Street, stated he would like to have clarification of the Mesa /Birch Alignment shown on the wall map. Frank Lasae, 225 Camilia, Costa Mesa, stated he would like to purchase a home in the City, but is concerned as to what the growth and traffic will be like in 20 years, and suggested consideration be given to a "sensible rapid transit system." Roger Summers, 20292 Birch Street, Santa Ana Heights, stated he concurred in the remarks of Mr. Mullen, but would like to know more accurately the direction proposed for the alignment of Birch Street /Mesa Drive before he and other residents can really "argue for, or against it." Ray Groover of Catamaran Circle, stated his homes back up to San Joaquin Hills Road and discussed its proposed widening. Katherine Gray, 2774 Hill View Drive in Harbor View Knoll, stated that many neighborhoods will be affected by the Corridor and she would hope that the Council would support "both connections to the Corridor, or no connections." Richard Nichols, 519 Iris Avenue, representative of Corona del Mar Community Association, submitted a prepared statement regarding their concerns as to the residential and commercial proposals contained in the proposed plan. They also suggested the plan be put to a vote of the electorate at a special election, in order that its merits can be debated. Mitchell Brown, 1979 Port Cardigan Place, stated that he was also supportive of both connections to the Corridor or none at all. He stated it Volume 42 - Page 378 GPA 87 -1(A6 E) COUNCIL MEM13ERS ,\aG y �� �G��`� E Motion All Ayes • Motion All Ayes. • KW x CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES September 26, 1988 was his understanding that San Miguel Road has to be connected to Ford Road because it is an arterial road, and he would hope that connection could be modified in some way. He also felt that if Culver Drive is not connected to Pelican Hill Road, traffic will find alternative ways to their neighborhoods, specifically Ford Road, San Miguel and eventually Marguerite Avenue. The Mayor stated that due to the lateness of the hour (11:00 p.m.), no further testimony would be taken at this time and moved to continue this public hearing to 6:00 p.m., October 10, 1988. E. PUBLIC COMMENTS: 1. David Dill, 704 Acacia Avenue, addressed the Council. regarding the proposed changes to Coco's Restaurant at 2305 E. Coast Highway in Corona del Mar. He discussed his concerns regarding the change in character of the restaurant, increased traffic and noise, as enumerated in his letter of September 19, 1988. Lila Crespin, 707 Begonia Avenue, addressed the Council and submitted response sheets with 223 signatures in opposition to the proposed "Edies Diner" at 2305 E. Pacific Coast Highway in Corona del Mar, known as Coco's Restaurant. Richard Barron, 709 Begonia Avenue, addressed the Council and stated that Corona del Mar is a "very sophisticated area," and he would hope that the City Council sees that the area does not change for the worse. 2. Sid Soffer, 900 Arbor Street, Costa Mesa, addressed the Council and clarified his statements made at past Council meetings regarding the availability of staff reports in the City Clerk's office. F. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following actions were taken as indicated, except for the item removed: 1. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION: None. Volume: 42 - Page 379 9 L Council 4 Agenda Rpts COUNCIL MEMBERS • • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES September 26, 1988 2. RESOLUTIONS FOR ADOPTION: None. 3. CONTRACTS /AGREEMENTS: (a) Award Contract No. 2708 to Roy Allan Slurry Seal of Santa Fe Springs in the amount of $280,800 for the 1988 -139 Street Slurry Seal Program; and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute said contract. (Report from Public Works Department) 4. COMMUNICATIONS - For referral as indicated: '88/89 St Slurry S1 (38) (a) To Executive Assistant to the City COMC Manager for response, letter of (42) complaint from Mrs. Alan Wagner alleging difficulty in getting repairs to their cable television by COMCAST. (b) To Public Works Department for inclusion in the records, letter of protest from Steen Construction Company to Council action that awarded contract for Channel Park Improvements (Contract 2664) on September 12, 1988, w /response from Assistant City Attorney. (c) To staff for response, letter from Mary G. Singleton requesting the Peninsula Point Homeowners Association and Eastbluff have a representative on the Ad -Hoc Aviation Committee, as aircraft are routed directly over their homes. (d) To staff for response, letter from Mary G. Singleton alleging resistance from the Ad -Hoc Aviation Committee regarding accurate answers from experts regarding the take off patterns and airport problem. (e) To General Services for response, letter from the West Newport Beach Association regarding various City improvements in the West Newport Park area. Volume 42 - Page 380 (38) 24) 24) Impry ion Prk is • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COUNCIL MEMBERS AGE CG�� ;ALL September 26, 1988 MINUTES (f) To Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission for consideration, letter from Greg Connor referring to signed petitions requesting the City acquire the property at the . lookout point (corner of Pacific and Begonia) in Corona del Mar. (petitions on file in the City Clerk "s office) (g) To Traffic Affairs Committee for response, letter from Mrs. Joll Beal requesting speed bumps in the alleys and on the streets of Peninsula Point. (h) To Business License Supervisor for response, letter from Marcus A. Dansby requesting a refund of fees paid for taxi permit, alleging he was told he could get a refund if he withdrew his application before he had been fingerprinted. 5. COMMUNICATIONS - For referral to the City Clerk for inclusion in the records: None. 6. CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES - For denial and confirmation of the City Clerk's referral to the claims adjuster: (a) Michael T. Allen alleging his parked vehicle was damaged by Police Officer who attempted to break into car in order to issue citation on August 26, 1988, at 2661 Point Del Mar. (b) Marcia R. Chapman alleging personal injuries and vehicle damage as a result of being rear -ended by City truck on July 18, 1988, at Seashore Drive and 57th Street. (c) Keith Goodall alleging damage to vehicle as a result of raised manhole cover in street on Anniversary Lane on May 26, 1988. (d) Glen R.. Justice and Jane 0. Justice alleging City sewer backed up into their home and damaged carpet, floor, etc., at 240 Hazel Drive, on August 31, 1988. Volume 42 - Page 381 (62) (85) Bus Lic (27) (36) COUNCIL MEN A I\\ is CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 26, 1988 (e) Charles W. Masters alleging damage to floor of structures at 3800 and 3810 E. Coast Highway on August 24, 1988, as a result of City sewer lines backing up. (f) Brian E. Potter alleging his vehicle towed in error on September 3, 1988 at Palm and Bay Streets, seeking reimbursement of towing charge. (g) LeRoy J. Skaff alleging City vehicle ran into claimant's parked vehicle on 31st Street, on August. 9, 1988. Skaff (h) Michael Slonaker seeking indemnity Slonaker from claim filed by Barbara Roy regarding accident at 15th Street and Balboa Boulevard on January 28, 1988. 7. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINTS - For denial and (36) confirmation of the City Clerk °a referral to the claims adjustsr: (a) Petition for Order Relieving Elder Petitioner from provisions of Gov. Code, etc., from Gary Elder regarding accident on August 7, 1987, at Larkspur and Pacific Coast Highway in Corona del Mar, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 564723. (b) Western Sales 8 Rentals vs. Noveco, 1western Sis/ Inc., and the City of Newport Noveco Beach, Orange County Municipal Court, Case No. 94043 for money damages for breach of contract, etc. 8. REQUEST TO ,APPROVE /FILL PERSONNEL (66) VACANCIES: (Report from the City Manager) (a) One Police Officer, Patrol Division. (b) One Account Clerk, Business License. 9. STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS - For Council information and approval: (a) Report from the City Attorney City regarding REQUEST FOR AMICUS Attorney PARTICIPATION IN BALISTIERI V. (31) PACIFICA POLICE DEPARTMENT. Volume 42 - Page 382 COUNCIL MEMBERS wAG��`G��� • • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 26, 1988 (b) Proposed OCTOBER /NOVEMBER 1988, Citizens' EDITION OF "CITIZENS' REPORTER" Rptr NEWSLETTER. (35) (c) Report from Parks, Beaches & PB &R Recreation Director recommending (62) that facility fees be waived for the BROWNIE TROOP #181 for use of Grant Howald Community Youth Center meeting room. (d) Letter to Dan Young, Chairman, League CA' Transportation Committee, League of Cities /Trnsp California Cities, from Mayor with LU Mdl Plcy written comments to the (61) TRANSPORTATION -LAND USE MODEL POLICY. For Council information and filing: (e) Removed from the Consent Calendar. 10. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULING: None. 11. TRACT NO. 12309 - Accept the public Tract 12309 improvements constructed in conjunction with Tract No. 12309 [property bounded by MacArthur Boulevard, Bison Avenue, Camelback Street, Jamboree Road and San Diego Creek, in the North Ford Planned Community]; authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds for the on -site public street improvements and circulation element [Bond Nos. 5240 94 47 and 5240 94 48] and release the Labor and Material Bonds for the on -site public street improvements and the circulation element (Bond Nos. 5240 94 47 and 5240 94 481 in six months provided no claims have been filed. (Report from Public Works Department) 12. BALBOA ISLAND BULKHEAD REPAIR NEAR Bal Is Blkhd WATERS WAY (CONTRACT 2525) - Accept the Rpr /Wtrs Wy, work; and authorize the City Clerk to C -2525 file a Notice of Completion and release (38) the bonds 35 days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded in accordance with applicable portions of the Civil Code. (Report from Public Works Department) 13. ENCROACHMENT APPLICATION OF ROD EMORY - Permit/ Approve the application to construct Emory walkway and stairs encroaching four (4) Encrchm feet into Ocean Boulevard adjacent to (65) 2741 Ocean Boulevard; subject to an Volume 42 - Page 383 COUNCIL MEMBERS ti aG9y��G 4AA • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES September 26, 1988 Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department; execution of an agreement for nonstandard improvements; and a survey of the property establishing the front property lines. (Report from Public Works Department) 14. SPECIAL EVENTS PERMITS - Uphold staff's Permits/ recommendation to approve the following 1Spc1 Evnts applications, subject to conditions (65) listed in f :he staff report for: (Report from Business License Supervisor) 15 (a) Application $88 -134 - Special Olympics request to conduct the 11th Annual "Human Race" triathlon on Sunday, October 9, 1988 from 7:30 - 10:00 a.m. on Back Bay Road and Newport Dunes Aquatic Park; (b) Application #88 -330 - Use of public beach and amplified sound in a residential area from the Chamber of Commerce, to conduct the annual sandcastle building contest on Sunday, October 16, 1988, from 11:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m., at Corona del Mar State Beach. BUDGET AMENDMENTS - For approval: BA -024, $32,950 - Increase in Unappropriated Surplus and Revenue Estimates for Grant from State of California Library Services Act for California Literacy Campaign; Library Fund. BA -025, $16,540 - Decrease in Unappropriated Surplus and Increase in Budget Appropriations for funds for cost of materials and hiring of Student Laborers for established litter free zone at McFadden Square; General Services -Field Maintenance Fund. (25) BA -026, $12.5,000 - Decrease in Undergr Fuel Unappropriated Surplus and Increase in Strg Tak Rpl Budget Appropriations for replacement of C -2679 underground fuel storage tanks [Contract (38) 2679]; General Fund. (Report from Public Works Department) • I I I I I I I I G. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR: 1 Report to the City Manager regarding Plan ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION (68) ON SEPTEMBE1t 8, 1988, was presented. Volume 42 - Page 384 COUNCIL MEMBERS .�G�Z��G�� Motion All Ayes 11 Motion All Ayes • Motion All Ayes Motion • X x X X CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES September 26, 1988 Motion was made to schedule public U/P 3279 hearing on Use Permit No. 3279, Lido Lido Mdcl Medical Center on property located at Ctr 351 Hospital Road, for October 10, 1988, and that said hearing be heard prior to the contined hearing on the General Plan Update. H. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION: 1. Proposed ORDINANCE NO. 88 -33, being, Ord 88 -33 Bal Is Ferry AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF Franchise. THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO THE BALBOA ISLAND FERRY, INC., was presented for second reading with recycled report dated September 12, 1988, from the Executive Assistant to the City Manager. Motion was made to adopt Ordinance No. 88 -33. 2. Proposed ORDINANCE NO. 88 -35, being, Ord 88 -35 Escort Srvs AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF (27) THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ADDING CHAPTER 5.90 TO THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO ESCORT SLRVICES, was presented with recycled report from the Assistant City Attorney dated September 12, 1988. Motion was made to adopt Ordinance No. 88 -35. I. CONTINUED BUSINESS: 1. Status report from the Planning Department regarding SCAG REGIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN AND REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT, was presented. Motion was made to adopt Resolution No. 88 -95, authorizing the City Manager to sign the letter to Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) with the City's comments on the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, with the request that reference be made in said letter to possible annexations of Santa Ana Heights, the Banning /Beeco property and the Down Coast property; and to direct staff to continue monitoring the preparation of the SCAG Regional Strategic Plan. Volume 42 - Page 385 SCAG Rgnl SP /Rgnl H$g (68) 88 -95 COUNCEL MEME ti n Ayes Motion All Ayes J 0 x CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES September 26, 1988 Council Member Turner suggested another word be substituted for the word "infill" in the subject letter, inasmuch as there is no specific and accurate definition for the word "infill." The motion was voted on and carried. J. CURRENT BUSINESS: 1. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AFFAIRS /CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE VACANCY: Motion was made to accept the resignation letter of Thomas C. Edwards (appointed to the Planning Commission); and defer to October 10, 1988, (District 4) Council Member Turner's appointment to fill the unexpired term ending December 31, 1988. Adjourned at 11:20 p.m., to 6:00 p.m., October 10, 1988. The agenda for this meeting was posted on September 22, 1988, at 9:45 a.m., on the City Hall Bulletin Board located outside of the City of Newport Beach Administration Building. Volume 42 — Page 386 EQA /CAC