HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/24/1989 - Regular MeetingPresent x x
Absent
Motion
Aes
Motion
All Ayes
Motion
All Ayes
•
Motion
Ayes
Noes
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Uz:
y �0 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
f 9a PLACE: Council Chambers
DATE: July 24,, 1989
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
x
xI'I X1 x1 l x
IA. ROLL CALL.
B. Reading of Minutes of Adjourned and
Regular Meetings of July 10, 1989, was
waived, approved as written, and ordered
filed.
C. Reading in full of all ordinances and
resolutions under consideration was
waived, and City Clerk was directed to
read by titles only.
ID. HEARINGS:
1. Mayor Strauss opened the public hearing
to confirm the report of the Fire Chief
concerning the cost of the abatement of
weeds and other nuisances.
Hearing no one wishing to address the
Council, the public hearing was closed.
Motion was made to adopt Resolution No.
89 -79 confirming the report of the Fire
Chief concerning the cost of the
abatement of weeds and other nuisances,
and requesting the Auditor - Controller of
Orange County to enter the amount of
each assessment referred to in said
report on the County Tax Roll.
2. Mayor Strauss opened the public hearing
pursuant to Newport Beach Municipal Code
Section 5.13.140 to consider adoption of
a resolution approving amendment to
Certificate of Convenience and Necessity
for PACIFIC COAST TOWING, 2209 S. Lyon
Street, Santa Ana, to allow private
property impound service.
Report from Business License Supervisor.
Hearing no one wishing to address the
Council, the public hearing was closed.
Motion was made to approve the amendment
to Certificate of Convenience and
Necessity for Pacific Coast Towing to
allow private property impound service.
Council Member Hart indicated that she
voted "no" on the above request,
inasmuch as she felt there was a
sufficient amount of towing companies
already serving the City, and that the
distance from Santa Ana to Newport Beach
was too far for impound storage.
Volume 43 - Page 290
Fire/Weed
Abatmt
(41)
Res 89 -79
PD /Pac Cst
Towing
(70)
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
July 24, 1989
3. Mayor Strauss opened the public hearing GPA 88 -2(C)
regarding GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. (45)
88 -2(C), a request initiated by the City
of Newport Beach to revise the HOUSING
ELEMENT OF THE NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL
PLAN as required by State law.
Report from the Planning Department.
Letter from California State Department
of Housing and Community Development
concerning review of Draft Housing
Element.
The City Attorney distributed two pages
of the Housing Element which had
inadvertently been omitted from the
Council's copy of the Housing Element.
He stated the pages were nonsubstantive
portions of the Element, which were
included when the document was
transmitted to the State Department of
Housing.
It was noted that the Planning
Commission held two public hearings on
the revision of the Housing Element,
April 13 and May 4, 1989, and at the
meeting of May 4, the Commission voted
unanimously to recommend approval in
concept and accept the previously
certified environmental document as
adequate.
Mayor Strauss commented that he would
like to see a more affirmative policy
with respect to mobile homes, inasmuch
as mobile homes are one of the few types
of affordable housing left these days;
and therefore, suggested the existing
mobile home policy be expanded to
increase the stock of mobile homes.
Reference was made to page 37 of the
Housing Element relative to Mobile
Homes; wherein the City Manager pointed
out that additional language
"strengthening" the current policy could
be added if desired.
Discussion ensued, wherein the City
Attorney stated that if it is the desire
of the Council, the staff could bring
back some additional language that could
be added to the Housing Element at a
subsequent General Plan Amendment
hearing. He felt that, inasmuch as the
subject EIR has been certified as
adequate, it would not be advisable to
make any substantial changes at this
time.
Volume 43 - Page 291
Motion
All Ayes
•
0
x
CITY OF (NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
dip July 24, 1989
Robert Lenard, Advance Planning Manager,
commented that the Housing Element does
make reference to the Mobile Home
Overlay Zone which is in the City's
Municipal Code as an ordinance, and he
felt there was enough "strength" in the
Housing Element to satisfy Mayor
Strauss's concerns, inasmuch as there is
the ability to apply that overlay zone
to any mobile home park in the City.
Following discussion, it was the
consensus of the Council to consider the
Mobile Home Park issue separately from
the Housing Element at a future date.
Referencing the Housing Element again,
Mayor Strauss emphasized his ongoing
concern to extend the affordable housing
period beyond 30 years.
Hearing no one wishing to address the
Council on this matter, the public
hearing was closed.
Motion was made to adopt Resolution No.
89 -80, approving revisions to the
Housing Element of the Newport Beach
General Plan as required by State law,
and accepting the previously- certified
Environmental Document as adequate.
4. Mayor Strauss opened the public hearing
regarding:
A. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 89 -1(G)
- Request to amend the Circulation
Element of the Newport Beach
General Plan so as to establish a
precise alignment for the
connection of Mesa Drive to Birch
Street in Santa Ana Heights; and
the acceptance of an Environmental
Document;
Um
B. PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENT NO.
676 - Request to amend the Santa
Ana Heights Area Plan so as to
establish a precise alignment for
the connection of Mesa Drive to
Birch Street.
Report from the Public Works Department.
The City Clerk advised that after the
agenda was printed, 13 additional
letters were received regarding the
proposed alignment of Mesa Drive to
Birch Street.
Volume 43 - Page 292
Res 89 -80
GPA 89 -1(G)
(45)
Santa Ana
Heights
PCA 676
(94)
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
July 24, 1989
The City Manager pointed out that this GPA 89 -1(G)
item was the last issue of discretionary PCA 676
review by the City Council prior to any
annexation proceedings of Santa An
Heights.
Don Webb, City Engineer, explained the
four (4) alternative alignments
considered by the Planning Commission,
which on May 18, 1989 approved an
alignment for the Mesa Drive /Birch
Street connection that was between
Alignment 1 and 2, designated Alignment
2A. The Commission, in adopting
Alignment 2A, tried to reach a
compromise which took advantage of the
best features of Alignments 1 and 2.
Alignment 2A is roughly midway between
No. 1 and No. 2. It is approximately 95
feet southerly of Alignment 2 in the
vicinity of 2041 Mesa Drive. Alignment
2A requires less land acquisition than
Alignment 1, 2 or 3 and only 2800 square
feet more than Alignment 4. 9 homes are
affected by Alignment 2A. The roadway
alignment goes through a portion of 5
houses. The other 4 affected houses
will have to be acquired or moved to
provide proper sight distance for the
roadway curve. A clear distance of 25
to 30 feet from back of sidewalk is
needed through most of the curve. When
the sales of residual parcels are taken
into consideration, Alignment No. 2A has
the lowest right -of -way cost. Unless
rezoning occurs, the four residential
parcels easterly of Acacia Street on
Mesa Drive will be separated and
isolated from other residential areas by
the 4 lane roadway -. This would also be
the case in Alignments 1 and 2. The
estimated construction cost of Alignment
2A is $5.23 million, which is $850,000
more than 2. This is primarily due to
the higher cost of the retaining wall,
which is estimated to be $576,000. Of
the four alignments that provide the
needed traffic circulation, Alignment 2A
has the lowest total cost, with
Alignment 2 being a close second. It
was also noted that Alignment 4,
although it has the lowest cost, does
not provide the necessary traffic
circulation.
In conclusion, Mr. Webb stated that the
compromise Alignment 2A chosen by the
Planning Commission, provides the needed
traffic service for the Santa Ana
Heights and surrounding area. It
minimizes the property taken without
Volume 43 - Page 293
L]
w
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
0
July 24, 1989
substantially affecting the golf course
operation. For the alignment studies
(1, 2 and 3) that provide the needed
traffic service, Alignment 2A has the
lowest combined right -of -way and
construction costs. The staff supports
the Planning Commission's adopted
Alignment 2A and recommends the Council
adopt Alignment 2A as the precise
alignment for the connection of Mesa
Drive to Birch Street in Santa Ana
Heights.
During course of discussion, it was
noted by staff that, with regard to
funding for this project, the County
will be paying for the roadway
improvements out of Redevelopment Funds,
and the County Redevelopment Agency
feels they will have sufficient funds
within a 3 to 5 year period.
Rich Adler, representing the Orange
County Environmental Management Agency,
addressed the Council and stated that
the Redevelopment Agency "will be around
as long as improvements are needed in
this area," and the life of the
Redevelopment Plan could last as long as
40 years. The revenues the Agency
anticipates are extensive; the initial
bond issue was for $20 million dollars
with the net from that bond issue at $14
million dollars which is being used to
take care of the first two programs,
i.e., 1) purchase assurance program and
2) insulation of certain homes. They
anticipate revenues in 3 to 5 years to
complete the improvements under
consideration and intend not to
sacrifice any of the other two programs.
They are also looking at paying for some
of the improvements from other sources.
Mr. Adler also stated that the next step
is to take the Council approved
alignment to the County Planning
Commission and Board of Supervisors for
confirmation.
Jack Mullen, 2031 Mesa Drive, addressed
the Council and stated that he has
already entered into an agreement with
the County for the purchase of his
property; however, he was concerned for
other residents in the area who will be
losing their homes without being duly
compensated as a result of the
alignment. He stated that once the
alignment is "imprinted" on a piece of
property, that property no longer
Volume 43 - Page 294
GPA 89 -1(G)
PCA 676
Motion
•
•
x
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
EMBERS MINUTES
C� ¢
� �Gy99 C� 9�A
A
�p �W July 24, 1989 INDEX
becomes marketable. He also stated he CPA 89 -1(G)
was in support of Alignment 4 because it PCA 676
was the alignment the residents were
promised.
Bob Travers, 20391 Birch Street,
addressed the Council and stated he was
in favor of Alignment 2A, because it
takes the least amount of properties and
is more economically feasible. He also
publicly apologized to Mr. Webb for his
actions at the Planning Commission
meeting of May 8.
Fred Peterson, 20361 Birch Street,
addressed the Council and stated he was
concerned how soon his home would be
taken and how equitable the transaction
would be. He felt the $20 per sq. ft.
for homes taken one year ago was not a
fair price today.
Hearing no others wishing to address the
Council, the public hearing was closed.
Council Member Turner commented that
after analyzing the various alignments,
he felt Alignment 2A was the least
"disruptive;" and therefore, moved to
approve the project as recommended by
the Planning Commission and
Adopt Resolution No. 89 -81 Res 89 -81
accepting, approving and certifying
the Final Environmental Impact
Report;
i
Make the Findings contained in the
Statement of Facts with respect to
significant impacts identified in
the Final Environmental Impact
Report;
Find that the facts set forth in
the Statement of overriding
Considerations are true and
are supported by substantial
evidence in the record,
including the Final
Environmental Impact Report;
With respect to the project, find
that although the Final
Environmental Impact Report
identifies certain unavoidable
significant environmental effects
that will result if the project is
approved, the mitigation measures
identified shall be incorporated
into the project, and all
Volume 43 - Page 295
•
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
c
\GN40 A July 24, 1989
significant environmental effects
that can feasibly be mitigated or
avoided have been eliminated or
reduced to an an acceptable level,
and that the remaining unavoidable
significant effects, when balanced
against the facts set forth in the
Statement of Overriding
Considerations, giving greater
weight to the unavoidable
environmental effects, are
acceptable;
Adopt Resolution No. 89 -82 adopting
an amendment to the Circulation
Element of the Newport Beach
General Plan and the Circulation
Element Master Plan of Streets and
Highways establishing the alignment
for the connection of Birch Street
to Mesa Drive;
Introduce and pass to second
reading amendments to the Santa Ana
Heights Specific Plan, proposed
ORDINANCE NO. 89 -16, being:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH AMENDING CHAPTER
20.64 OF THE NEWPORT BEACH
MUNICIPAL CODE, THE SANTA ANA
HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN, SP -7,
TO ESTABLISH AN ALIGNMENT FOR
THE CONNECTION OF MESA DRIVE
TO BIRCH STREET (PLANNING
COMMISSION AMENDMENT NO. 676).
Following comments and concerns by
various Council Members, Council Member
Hart stated that if an alignment is
approved at this time, she would like to
amend the motion to have a letter sent
to the County Planning Department and
the Board of Supervisors urging that
they establish a list of priorities,
insofar as the purchase program is
concerned, and that the County purchase
those properties whose homes will be
impacted by this improvement in a timely
manner.
Council Member Turner indicated that he
had no objections to including the
amendment in his motion.
Mayor Strauss stated he will riot be
supporting the motion, inasmuch as he
favors Alignment 4 due to the fact it
was the County's initial proposal; it is
the least expensive alignment; it ranks
high on the engineering analysis; and it
Volume 43 - Page 296
Res 89 -82
Ord 89 -16
Zoning/
Santa Ana
Heights
SP -7
•
Pion x
Ayes x
Noes x
Ayes I xi x
Noes
Motion
6A
X
x x
X x'
X
x
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
July 24, 1989
is the alignment in which some type of GPA 89 -1(G)
commitment was given to the residents of ?CA 676
Santa Ana Heights.
Council Member Sansone indicated he
agreed with Mayor Strauss's comments,
and stated he, too, will not be
supporting the subject motion. He felt
the residents compromised when they
accepted Alignment 4, and if that is
what they want they should have it. He
also felt that if Santa Ana Heights is
annexed to the City, the City would have
control over the amount of construction
within the area by way of the City's
Traffic Phasing Ordinance.
Mayor Pro Tem Plummer stated she was in
favor of the motion primarily due to the
overwhelming amount of letters received
in support of Alignment 2A.
Council Member Watt stated her vote to
some degree is dependent upon her
understanding of "equitability" on the
part of the County in purchasing the
homes being taken for the alignment.
She indicated she would like to have a
better perception of this issue, or she
will have to lean towards Alignment 4,
which does not take any homes.
x I Following discussion, substitute motion
was made to approve Alignment 4, which
motion FAILED by a tie vote.
x I The motion as made by Council Member
Turner and amended by Council Member
Hart was voted on and carried.
5. Mayor Strauss opened the public hearing Vacation/
regarding VACATION AND ABANDONMENT of an Abandm Esm
Easement for Storm Drain purposes shown Strm Drn
on Parcel Map 79 -704 (Resubdivision No. Sea Island
616), Sheet No. 4 and adjacent to Lot 13 (90)
of Tract No. 9676 (westerly boundary of
the Newport Beach Country Club Golf
Course, Sea Island Condominiums).
Report from Public Works Department.
Hearing no one wishing to address the
Council, the public hearing was closed.
Motion was made to adopt Resolution No. Res 89 -83
89 -83 ordering the vacation and
abandonment of the storm drain easement;
and direct the City Clerk to have said
resolution recorded with the Orange
County Recorder.
Volume 43 - Page 297
Motion
All Ayes
is
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
�A s C,"
ip July 24, 1989
X
E. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
1. Hal Berg, 400 Clubhouse, addressed the Npt B1/
Council and complained of the loud music Loud Noise
emanating from Carla Jr. /Lucky Stores
parking lot on Newport Boulevard. He
stated that young people congregate in
the parking lot at night because the
security guard leaves at 6:00 p.m., and
the noise is very disturbing to nearby
residents.
The City Attorney advised that the
Police Department was aware of the
problem and that the property owner has
been contacted in an effort to solve the
matter.
Quinton Smith, 400 Clubhouse, addressed
the Council regarding "boom" cars (loud
stereo systems) in the area of 32nd
Street and Newport Boulevard. He
distributed copies of a Los Angeles
Times newspaper article dated July 23,
1989, concerning the same problem in
other cities. He stated that the loud
music from the "boom" cars continued
until 1:30 a.m, one evening last week
and that he telephoned the Police
Department three times.
Mayor Strauss reiterated that the Police
Department was keeping a closer watch in
the area and is making every effort to
control the problem.
F. CONSENT CALENDAR:
The following actions were taken as
indicated, except for those items removed.
1. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION:
Pass to second reading on August 14,
1989 -
(a) Proposed ORDINANCE NO. 89 -17, Ord 89 -17
being, Offenses/
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF Cnstr Noise
NEWPORT BEACH AMENDING SECTION (26)
10.28.040 OF THE NEWPORT BEACH
MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO
CONSTRUCTION NOISE. (Report
from City Attorney)
Volume 43 - Page 298
•
•
C J
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
n
�\Ao y0 9A
�V+ July 24, 1989
(b) Proposed ORDINANCE NO. 89 -18,
being,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH AUTHORIZING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WITH
THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
RETIREMENT SYSTEM TO PROVIDE
ONE YEAR FINAL COMPENSATION
FOR MISCELLANEOUS AND SAFETY
MEMBERS. (Memorandum from
Personnel Director)
Schedule for public hearing on August
14, 1989 -
(c) Removed from the Consent Calendar.
(d) Proposed ORDINANCE NO. 89 -19,
being,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH AMENDING CERTAIN
SECTIONS OF TITLE 20 OF THE
NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE
SO AS TO ESTABLISH FLOOR AREA
RATIOS AND LAND INTENSITIES
CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL
PLAN [PLANNING COMMISSION,
AMENDMENT N0. 675] (Report
from Planning Department)
2. RESOLUTIONS FOR ADOPTION:
(a) Resolution No. 89 -84 CALLING AND
GIVING NOTICE OF A SPECIAL ELECTION
to be held in the City of Newport
Beach on Tuesday, November 7, 1989,
for the submission to the qualified
electors of a MEASURE PERTAINING TO
AN EXTENSION OF THE LEASE COVERING
THE CITY /COUNTY DOCK PROPERTY
(CONTRACT NO. 910).
(b) Resolution No. 89 -85 REQUESTING THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY
OF ORANGE TO CONSOLIDATE a special
municipal election to be held on
Tuesday, November 7, 1989 WITH THE
STATEWIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTION
to be held on the same date.
(c) Resolution No. 89 -86 REQUESTING THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY
OF ORANGE TO CANVASS THE RETURNS of
the special municipal election to
be held on November 7, 1989, which
is to be consolidated with the
statewide school district election
to be held on the same date.
Volume 43 - Page 299
Ord 89 -18
Personnel/
P.E.R.S
Retirement
(66)
Ord 89 -19
Zoning/
Flr Area
Ratio
(94)
PCA 675
Spcl Elctn
County
Dock Prpty
Res 89 -84
C -910
(38/39)
Spcl Elctn
Cnsldtn
Res 89 -85
(39)
Spcl Elctn
Cnvssg
Res 89 -86
(39)
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
n
A July 24, 1989
(d) Resolution No. 89 -87 AUTHORIZING
Spcl Elctn
THE MAYOR OR ANY MEMBER OR MEMBERS
F1 Wrtn
OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO FILE A
Argm
•
WRITTEN ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF A
CITY MEASURE pertaining to an
Res 89-87
(39)
extension of the lease covering the
CITY /COUNTY DOCK PROPERTY.
3. CONTRACTS /AGREEMENTS:
(a) Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk
Orange Cty-
to sign the JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
City Hzrds
CREATING THE ORANGE COUNTY -CITY
Mtrls Emgcy
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EMERGENCY
Rspns Auth
RESPONSE AUTHORITY. (Report from
C -2760
Fire Chief)
(38)
(b) Authorize Mayor and City Clerk to sign
CdM Olympc
CORONA DEL MAR HIGH SCHOOL OLYMPIC
Pool Agm
POOL AGREEMENT. (Report from City
C -2761
Manager)
(38)
4. COMMUNICATIONS - For referral as
indicated:
(a) To Executive Assistant to the City
COMCAST
Manager for reply, letters of
CABLE TV
complaint from Craig McKessar and Harry
(42)
Hiner against COMCAST CABLE TV.
•
(b) To City Librarian for inclusion in
Library/
the records, letters in support of
New Central
NEW CENTRAL LIBRARY from Ruth and Dave
(50)
Gilbert, Thomas W. Henderson, Nancy
Abrams, Kathy Cooper, Marcia Boehm,
and Lynn Dowty.
Note: 18 additional letters
received in support of new library,
and one against, after the agenda
was printed.
(c) To Public Works Department for
PW /Corona
response, letter from Alan and Tamara
Hghlnds
Shelton requesting City enforce
TV Antenna
existing ordinance to eliminate
(74)
television antennas from roof tops
in the CORONA HIGHLANDS area.
(d) To City Manager for reply, letter from
Planning
Balboa Coves Community Association
(68)
opposing the operation of a car
wash on the HOAG PARKING LOT during
construction of the LIDO MEDICAL
BUILDING adjacent to Pacific Coast
•
Highway.
(e) Removed from the Consent Calendar.
Volume 43 - Page 300
•
is
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
C
G A�of
atp July 24, 1989
(f) To Marine Department /City Attorney Marine/
for response, letter from Andrew J. Recrtnl
Randolph requesting reconsideration vessels
of ORDINANCE 89 -9, regulating (51)
operation and launching of vessels
(JET SKIS) along the Pacific Ocean.
(g) To General Services for reply, GS /Bal Is
letter from Mrs. Lynne O'Brien Litter
regarding LITTER FREE ZONE ON (44)
BALBOA ISLAND.
(h) To Finance Department for payment, Offshr Oil
request of County of Santa Cruz for (87)
City's 1989 -90 contribution to OCS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT COORDINATION
PROGRAM regarding additional
OFFSHORE OIL DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS.
5. COMMUNICATIONS - For referral to the
City Clerk for inclusion in the records:
(a) Copy of letter from Newport Beach
Nautical Museum concerning their
continued interest in the City's
master plan for the MARINAPARK and
AMERICAN LEGION SITES.
6. CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES - For denial and
confirmation of the City Clerk's
referral to the claims adjuster:
(a) Application for Leave to Present
Late Claim of T. J. Abshier,
alleging property damage as a
result of sea water flooding his
house at 112 S. Bay Front, Balboa
Island, as a result of bulkhead
work being done under City Public
Works contract in March, 1988.
(b) Elizabeth Fontes alleging personal
injuries on January 9, 1989, on
Berkeley Drive near intersection of
Campus Drive, as a result of
traffic accident.
(c) Randall M. Goff alleging damage to
automobile as a result of no
warning signs posted at Seaview and
Goldenrod on July 2, 1989.
(d) Kathleen De Gregorio alleging
personal injuries as a result of
fall into "pothole" at Edward's
Cinema, 300 Newport Center on
June 22, 1989.
Volume 43 - Page 301
(36)
Abshier
Pontes
Gof f
De Gregorio
•
•
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
EMBERS A MINUTES
P
0
(� A
�W July 24, 1989 INDEX
(e) Janet D. Kiser seeking
Kiser
reimbursement for tetna shot
treatment as a result of stepping
on rusted spike sticking out of
sidewalk near Corona del Mar beach
on June 15, 1989.
(f) Lido Brass and Copper, Inc.,
Lido Brass/
alleging property damage as a
Copper
result of sewer backup at 3431 Via
Oporto on June 2, 1989.
(g) Patricia Passy and Victor Passy
Passy
alleging damages as a result of
traffic accident on Berkley Drive
near intersection with Campus Drive
on January 9, 1989.
(h) Randy Dean Ross alleging damage to
Ross
parked motorcycle east of Placentia
Avenue on Center Avenue by City
vehicle on June 16, 1989.
(i) Scott Kennedy Maritime Gallery
Scott
alleging property damage to floor
Kennedy
and carpet at 3431 Via Oporto,
Maritime
Suite 100 -C, due to flooding of
Gallery
sewage to front portion of gallery
on June 2, 1989.
7. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINTS - For denial and
(36)
confirmation of the City Clerk's
referral to the claims adjuster:
(a) Nicolas Sell for personal injuries,
Sell
Orange County Superior Court Case
No. 595285. Claim was denied by
City Council on January 9, 1989.
(b) Robert Speich for personal
Speich
injuries, Orange County Superior
Court, Case No. 528595. Claim was
denied by City Council January 12,
1987.
(c) Nicholas Shoup for personal
Shoup
injuries, Orange County Superior
Court, Case No. 590170. Claim was
denied by City Council on January
9, 1989.
8. REQUEST TO APPROVE /PILL PERSONNEL
(66)
VACANCIES: (Report from the City
Manager)
(a) One Video Producer, Police
Department.
(b) Two Police Officers, Patrol
Division.
Volume 43 - Page 302
•
•
.•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
July 24, 1989
(c) One Parking Control Officer,
Traffic Division.
(d) One Senior Parking Control Officer,
Traffic Division.
(e) One Administrative Clerk, Public
Works Department.
(f) One Refuse Worker I, General
Services Department.
(g) One Equipment Operator II, General
Services Department.
(h) One Groundsworker I, Parks
Division.
(i) One Groundsworker II, Parks
Division.
(j) One Building Maintenance Worker I,
Recreation Division.
(k) One Recreation Coordinator,
Recreation Division.
(1) One Maintenance Worker I, Field
Maintenance Division.
9. STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS -
For Council information and approval:
(a) Report from the Planning Department
regarding the ANNUAL RENTAL VACANCY
RATE SURVEY.
(b) Letter from the Mayor to the
Federal Aviation Administration
concerning near misses of aircraft
using JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT.
(c) Removed from the Consent Calendar.
(d) Report from Parks, Beaches and
Recreation Director concerning PARK
IN LIEU FEE ZONES.
For Council information and filing:
(e) Removed from the Consent Calendar
Volume 43 - Page 303
Planning/
Anul Rntl
Vcncy Rt
(68)
O/C-John
Wayne Arpt
(54)
PB &R /Prk
In -Lieu
Fee Znz
(62)
•
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
C
l\`vG9� °t�9a
�tA July 24, 1989
10. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULING - August 14,
1989:
(a) PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENT NO.
684 - A request to amend the
NEWPORT PLACE PLANNED COMMUNITY
DISTRICT REGULATIONS so as to allow
restaurant uses on General
Commercial Site 1, subject to the
approval of a use permit in each
case. Property located at 3601
Jamboree Road, on the northwesterly
corner of Jamboree Road and Bristol
Street North, in the Newport Place
Planned Community. (Report from
Planning Department)
(b) USE PERMIT NO. 3353/PCA 680/
RESUBDIVISION NO. 895 - Appeal
Application of David M. Stone, 132
S. Bay Front, Balboa Island for
mixed -use project at 119 -123'
Agate, to permit ground floor
garages and residential combined
with storage on the second floor.
11. SPECIAL EVENTS PERMITS - Uphold staff's
recommendation to approve the following
applications, subject to conditions in
the staff report. (Report from Business
License Supervisor)
(a) Application No. 89 -134 - Scott
English for amplified sound at
Balboa Pier Gazebo for concert
on August 6, 1989, from 1:00 -
3:00 p.m.
(b) Application No. 89 -205 - Mr.
and Mrs. William Martin for
amplified sound in a
residential area for
graduation party at 1824 West
Ocean Front on August 5, 1989,
from 6:30 - 11:00 p.m.
(c) Application No. 89 -217 - Mr.
and Mrs. Donald Ward for
amplified sound in a
residential area for wedding
reception at 116 Kings Place
on August 5, 1989, from 4:30 -
10:00 P.M.
12. BUDGET AMENDMENTS - For approval:
(a) The following budget amendments are
to provide for Salaries,
Retirement, Health and Life
Insurance adjustments:
Volume 43 - Page 304
?CA 684
(94)
/P 3353
88)
25)
ts/
17
•
•
y Oo
�9Gi�P � ¢ 9A� July 24, 1989
BA -002, $1,921,460 - Decrease in
Unappropriated Surplus and Increase
in Budget Appropriations; General
Fund.
BA -003, $144,575 - Decrease in
Unappropriated Surplus and Increase
in Budget Appropriations; Park and
Recreation Fund.
BA -004, $109,360 - Decrease in
Unappropriated Surplus and Increase
in Budget Appropriations; Library
Fund.
BA -005, $2,925 - Decrease in
Unappropriated Surplus and Increase
in Budget Appropriations; Tide and
Submerged Lands Fund.
BA -006, $88,805 - Decrease in
Unappropriated Surplus and Increase
in Budget Appropriations; Water
Fund.
BA -007, $1,045 - Decrease in
Unappropriated Surplus and Increase
in Budget Appropriations;
Marinapark Fund.
(b) BA -008, $2,430 - Decrease in
Unappropriated Surplus and Increase
in Budget Appropriations for
property taxes for lessor's at
Balboa Yacht Basin; Tide and
Submerged Lands Fund.
G. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. Report from Planning Department
regarding proposed ordinance relating to
Granny Units.
It was noted that the two changes made
in the Granny Ordinance were an increase
in minimum lot size from 5,000 to 5,450
Sq. ft., and revised language of
paragraph G.
Council Member Turner expressed his
desire to delete paragraph G, which
states that "the primary residence shall
be continuously occupied by at least one
person having an ownership interest in
the property."
Volume 43 - Page 305
Units
(94)
•
Motion
All Ayes
Motion
All Ayes
•
Motion
All Ayes
x
x
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
x
July 24, 1989
During course of discussion, it was
suggested by Council Member Sansone that
paragraph G be changed to read. "Either
the Granny Unit or the primary residence
shall be occupied by a person having
ownership in the property."
Following consideration, it was
indicated by the Council they were not
ready to take action on this item at
this time; therefore, motion was made to
defer introduction of the proposed
ordinance to August 14, 1989.
2. Report to the City Manager regarding Plat
ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION (68)
ON JULY 6, 1989, and AGENDA FOR JULY 20,
1989.
Motion was made to schedule public ari
hearing on VARIANCE NO. 1152 for 1152
August 28, 1989, and to receive and file (91)
the remaining actions.
3. Letter from Sanford Brickner concerning
CORONA HIGHLANDS UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
and relation to children living near
electromagnetic cancer producing fields.
(89)
Council Member Watt expressed an
interest to know more about
electromagnetic producing fields as
referenced in the subject letter, and
suggested the staff review the matter
and report back.
The Public Works Director replied that
the Southern California Edison Company
does have some information on this
subject; however, Mr. Brickner has asked
that the City not rely on the Edison
Company for response. He stated it was
his understanding there is nothing
definite or proven in this regard as
yet, and that a great deal of research
is needed before positive conclusions
can be made.
In view of the foregoing, motion was
made to refer the subject letter to the
City Manager for response.
4. Report from Traffic Affairs Committee Traffic/
regarding RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS ON SAN SJHls Rd,
JOAQUIN HILLS ROAD BETWEEN JAMBOREE ROAD AND Rsd Pvmt
SANTA CRUZ DRIVE, with letter from Canyon Mrkrs
Crest Homeowners Association. (85)
Volume 43 — Page 306
•
Motion
All Ayes
M
All Ayes
•
gi
X
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
July 24, 1989
Beryl Sokolowski, 3 Rue Marseille,
addressed the Council in support of the
recommendation of the Traffic Affairs
Committee. She stated that she and her
husband are very grateful for the action
taken by the Committee and to the City
Council for listening to their concerns.
She also complimented the City employees
she had come in contact with during this
effort and stated they were very
courteous and helpful.
Motion was made to approve the
recommendation of the Traffic Affairs
Committee as follows: "Direct staff to
remove the raised pavement markers
(Botts dots) on San Joaquin Hills Road
between Jamboree Road and Santa Cruz
Drive. The raised markers are to be
replaced with painted striping
supplemented with reflective pavement
markers per CalTrans standards."
H. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION:
None.
I. CONTINUED BUSINESS:
1. APPOINTMENTS TO THE CITIZENS ADVISORY
COMMITTEE FOR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS.
Motion was made to confirm the following
appointments:
(District 2) Council Member
Plummer's appointment of Mary
Williams;.remaining appointment
deferred to August 14.
(District 3) Council Member Hart's
appointment deferred to August 14.
(District 5) Council Member Watt's
appointments of Natalie Fogarty and
Jimmie Jones.
(District 6) Council Member
Sansone's appointments deferred to
August 14.
J. CURRENT BUSINESS:
1. Report from Executive Assistant to the
City Manager regarding HUMAN SERVICES
ORGANIZATION ASSISTANCE REQUESTS.
Volume 43 - Page 307
Motion
All Ayes
•
E
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
IN��GwtA July 24, 1989
x
It was recommended the following grants
be approved:
Harbor Area Adult Day
Care Center - $10,000
Huntington Beach
Community Clinic - 1,000
Y.E.S. Harbor Area - 4,000
Leadership Tomorrow - 2,500
Newport -Mesa YMCA - 7,500
Motion was made to approve the
recommended allocations.
2. Report from City Manager and Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Commission
concerning CONSOLIDATED ELECTION
REGARDING SALE OF PROPERTY AT 4210 RIVER
AVENUE.
Letter from Jill Lindsay.
The City Manager distributed a
photograph of the City -owned surplus
property and stated the parcel was
appraised in January, 1989 for $325,000
to $350,000. The documents prepared to
place this item on the November 1989
ballot include the stipulation that the
revenue from the sale of this property
is placed in a fund to acquire or
develop a public improvement project,
i.e., park, library, etc. In essence,
the public improvement project would
benefit a greater number of people than
the subject 30 x 100 foot lot.
The City Manager also noted that if the
electorate votes to sell the property,
the City must first offer it to certain
other public agencies. However, due to
the high cost of the parcel, he felt
these agencies would not be interested
in purchasing the subject property.
The following persons addressed the
Council in opposition to placing the
surplus property on the ballot,
indicating they felt the parcel should
be preserved as a greenbelt area.
Don Borthwick, 205 Canal Street
Jack R. Alward, 4208 River Avenue
Meredith Bolton, 213 43rd Street
Volume 43 - Page 308
0 Rvr
(39)
•
Motion
•
•
x
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
o�
July 24, 1989
Mayor Pro Tem Plummer stated she
sympathized with the neighboring
property owners, but inasmuch as this
parcel is City -owned surplus property,
she felt the proceeds received from its
sale can be used towards a public
project which will be of greater benefit
to more residents than the vacant lot is
now.
In view of the foregoing comments,
motion was made to adopt the following
resolutions:
Resolution No. 89 -88 CALLING AND
GIVING NOTICE OF A SPECIAL ELECTION
to be held in the City of Newport
Beach on Tuesday, November 7, 1989,
for the submission to the qualified
electors of a MEASURE RELATING TO
THE SALE OF BEACHFRONT PROPERTY AT
4210 RIVER AVENUE.
Resolution No. 89 -89 requesting the
Board of Supervisors of the County
of Orange to CONSOLIDATE A SPECIAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION to be held on
November 7, 1989, with the
statewide school district election
to be held on the same date.
Resolution No. 89 -90 requesting the
Board of Supervisors of the County
of Orange to CANVASS THE RETURNS OF
THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION to
be held on November 7, 1989, which
is to be consolidated with the
statewide school district election
to be held on the same date.
Resolution No. 89 -91 AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO FILE A WRITTEN
ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT of a City
measure pertaining to the sale of
waterfront property at 4210 River
Avenue.
Council Member Watt stated she will not
be supporting the motion inasmuch as the
funds derived from the proposed sale
will not be used for public improvements
in this same location, and consequently,
the neighbors in this area are left
without a greenbelt area. She also felt
it would be premature to sell the
property at this time due to the City's
outreach program whose goal is to
identify communities needs in terms of
mini and neighborhood parks.
Volume 43 - Page 309
Election/
4210 Rvr
Prpty
89 -88
i
89 -89
89 -91
•
Ayes
Noes
•
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
0
� �G�f 9N
l avo July 24, 1989
xixixlxlxi Ix
MINUTES
Council Member Turner reminded the Election/
Council that the subject parcel belongs 4210 Rvr
to "all" the residents of Newport Beach; Prpty
and therefore, the residents have the
right to make the decision as to its use
and whether or not it should be sold.
Mayor Strauss stated he will not support
the motion, as there is so little left
of vacant City -owned property. He also
stated he was in agreement with Council
Member Watt to wait a few years before
placing this on the ballot.
The motion was voted on and carried.
3. Report from Public Works Department Permit/
regarding APPEAL OF DONALD C. STINE, Stine
Architect, from denial of an application Encrchm
to construct raised patios ENCROACHING (65)
INTO NORTH BAYFRONT AND AGATE AVENUE;
steps encroaching into Agate Avenue, and
a curb on Agate Avenue for 411 North
Bayfront when vehicular access available
from the alley.
Donald Stine, 819 W. Sixteenth Street,
architect for the applicant, addressed
the Council and referenced his letter of
June 28, 1989, outlining the reasons for
the appeal.
Mr. Stine stated that he did not feel
their request for a patio encroachment
was out of line with other patio
encroachments around Balboa Island. In
the past two years, he has received
approval of similar patio encroachments
for projects at 711 and 808 S. Bay
Front, as well as approval for street
access to the garage at 711 S. Bay
Front. In addition, the required depth
of the garages, if entered from the
alley causes severe restrictions to the
living area of the first floor. The
garage configuration, if oriented to the
street, creates an extra parking space
on the applicant's property and this
will make up for the lost street parking
space.
Discussion ensued, wherein the Public
Works Director commented that if the
step encroachment was not permitted it
would require a redesign of the
configuration of the steps that are
shown on the drawing. Also, the steps
Volume 43 - Page 310
•
Motion
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PD 4
��9G��A � July 24, 1989
x
MINUTES
could be structurally independent of the
portion of the application that consists
of a raised patio deck and raised
planter.
The Public Works Director further
pointed out that it was the two previous
locations where Mr. Stine submitted
similar designs, and one other location,
that triggered the Council's review of
Council Policy L -6 - "Private
Encroachments in Public Rights -Of- Way."
Recognizing the fact that it is now
necessary for protection for flood
control purposes to raise floor slabs of
buildings on Balboa Island above the
existing street grade, there is a desire
to construct raised patios in
conjunction with the buildings. When
the City Council considered the policy
revisions in February 1989, the action
taken was to prohibit raised patio
encroachments. With regard to street
access to the garages, he felt there was
no significant reason for departing from
the provisions of the policy with
respect to garage access.
Following discussion, motion was made to
deny the appeal, except for the step
encroachment to the sidewalk.
Council Member Watt stated her motion
was made with the understanding that she
is saving one curb parking space, as
opposed to the extra square footage in
the house.
Jack Northrup, applicant, addressed the
Council and stated he felt there were
two fundamental issues under
consideration, i.e., 1) the
encroachment, and 2) driveway access.
The encroachment on Agate Avenue is for
landscaping purposes and not a patio.
Regarding the patio in front, the
elevation is a function of the
requirement of the City with respect to
the level of the house. He further
stated that the encroachments that have
taken place in the neighborhood are very
similar, and after talking with his
neighbors, they have no objection to the
type of encroachment being requested.
With regard to the driveway access, he
stated that due to the lot being
trapezoidal rather than rectangular,
they are able to add another parking
space to the property to make up for the
one taken from the street.
Volume 43 - Page 311
Permit/
Stine
Encrchm
All Ayes
Ll
a
is
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
e y9� C� 9�
July 24, 1989
After further discussion, the motion on
the floor was voted on and carried.
Meeting adjourned at 10:45 p.m.
The agenda for this meeting was posted
on July 20, 1989, at 8:30 a.m., on the
City Hall Bulletin Board located outside
of the City of Newport Beach
Administration Building.
ATTEST:
";e2�
City Clerk
Volume 43 - Page 312