HomeMy WebLinkAbout06 - On -Street Parking Time Limit on Coast Highway within Corona del Mar Commercial DistrictPORT CITY OF
O �
_ i NEWPORT BEACH
City Council Staff Report
<i FO RN
July 9, 2019
Agenda Item No. 6
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: David A. Webb, Public Works Director - 949-644-3311,
dawebb@newportbeachca.gov
PREPARED BY: Antony Brine, City Traffic Engineer, tbrine@newportbeachca.gov
PHONE: 949-644-3329
TITLE: Resolution No. 2019-68: Increase of On -Street Parking Time Limit on
Coast Highway within Corona del Mar Commercial District
ABSTRACT -
The Corona del Mar Business Improvement District (BID) and the Corona del Mar
Residents Association are seeking approval to increase the on -street parking time limit
on Coast Highway and adjacent side streets in the Corona del Mar (CdM) commercial
district from one-hour to two -hours.
RECOMMENDATION:
a) Determine this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines
because this action will not result in a physical change to the environment, directly or
indirectly.
b) Adopt Resolution 2019-68, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Newport
Beach, California, Limiting the Parking of Vehicles on Certain Streets and Repealing
Resolution No. 2016-36.
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
The current adopted Capital Improvement Budget includes sufficient funding for
installation of the new signs. The signs will be expensed to Account 01201927-980000-
19T03 (Traffic Signage, Striping and Markings).
DISCUSSION:
The CdM BID expressed its concerns with parking conditions in the Village and the belief
that there are impediments placed on existing and future businesses based on current
parking conditions and restrictions.
6-1
Resolution No. 2019-68: Increase of On -Street Parking Time Limit on Coast Highway
within Corona del Mar Commercial District
July 9, 2019
Page 2
The City engaged Walker Consultants in 2018 to conduct a study in the CdM commercial
district to include a collection of parking data, an analysis of the conditions, and to provide
recommendations to address parking issues in the district.
One of the recommendations made in the study included an extension of the time limit for
parking on Coast Highway and the adjacent side streets in the commercial district from
the existing one-hour time limit to a proposed two-hour limit. The study outlines the
advantages to making the proposed time limit change:
• Parking data in the study demonstrate that there is underutilization of on -street
parking spaces along Coast Highway. Increasing the time limit should increase
the utilization of unoccupied spaces.
• There are a variety of land uses in the CdM commercial district that typically have
a longer length of stay than one hour, such as nail salons, beauty salons, and
restaurants. Increasing the time limit of the on -street parking should help improve
the public's access to these land uses.
• If vehicles can park on Coast Highway for a longer duration of time, there may be
less spillover into adjacent residential streets.
The Corona del Mar Residents Association reviewed the request and provided a letter of
support for the proposed parking time limit changes. It is recommended that the entire
commercial district from Acacia Avenue to Seaward Road be included in the changes.
All existing 1 Hour Parking, 7 AM to 6 PM, Every Day" signs will be changed to "2 Hour
Parking, 7 AM to 6 PM, Every Day". Sufficient parking enforcement will initially be
necessary to address some potential issues, such as employees using on -street parking
intended for visitors and customers.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Staff recommends the City Council find this action is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not
result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment)
and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA
Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no
potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.
NOTICING:
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of
the meeting at which the City Council considers the item).
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A — Letter from Corona del Mar Business District
Attachment B — Letter from Corona del Mar Residents Association
Attachment C — Walker Consultants Corona del Mar Parking Study
Attachment D — Resolution No. 2019-68
6-2
Advisory Boord
Bernie Svalstad
Chairperson
Scott Laidlaw
Vice Chair
Keith Dawson
Treasurer
Ed Hanley
Secretary
Shawn Lim
Director
Jim Walker
Director
Hamid Kianapur
Director
Scott LeFleur
Director
CDM BID
Financial Reporting
Community Business
Solutions
(949)200-9851
Marketing &
Administration
Corona del Mar
Chamber of
Commerce
(949) 673-4050
ATTACHMENT A
Corona del Mar
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT / City of Newport Beach
November 29, 2018
Dear Newport Beach City Council,
RE: Request for Staff Lead in Parkins Changes for CdM Business District
On behalf of the Advisory Board for the Corona del Mar Business Improvement District, we wish
to thank Council for approving the annual renewal of the CdM BID for FY 2018-19.
As you are aware, the BID in its advocacy role for the businesses in CdM is very interested in both
the current and long term health of the CdM business district as it affects not only our direct
constituents, the businesses, but also the adjacent residential neighborhoods and the city at large.
Like us, you have probably noted the fairly high number of vacancies in the store fronts along Coast
Highway which is alarming given the overall health of the economy. The rise of online purchasing
has changed the way people shop, and specifically changed the kinds of commercial uses they are
likely to frequent in their neighborhood. We believe that one of the largest impediments to entry
for more local friendly commercial uses is the current parking situation in the village.
To better understand the current parking situation and explore option for both improving the
current situation, the BID contracted Walker Consultants to:
*Quantify current commercial parking demand (on -street and off-street)
•Identify locations of "hot spots" of high on -street demand
•Identify locations of off-street parking available
•Compare city code required parking to observed demand
Please find attached a memorandum from Walker Consultants outlining their findings and
recommendations. Those recommendations include:
*Increasing the parking time limit on Coast Highway and side streets from one hour to two hours
*Incorporating underutilized private parking supply into the public parking supply
*Reducing and/or modifying the parking requirements to a blended approach in the
CdM business district
The BID has presented these finding numerous times to both the local businesses and residents
and received strong support for pursuing these changes. Therefore, we are seeking council
approval for the following:
• City staff assistance to support our efforts to improve the current parking situation.
• Approval to increase the parking time limit on Coast Highway and side streets from one hour
to two hours.
We are seeking council approval for increasing the parking time allotted for PCH and the first block
in from Coast Hwy (where limited) and changing the appropriate signs this spring (2019). We also
request that the city make the ordinance changes necessary to implement required parking ratio
adjustments, as recommended by the Walker Report in the next fiscal year.
Thank you in advance.
J3ewk Smd.,,tad
Bernie Svalstad, Chairman CdMBID
2855 E. Coast Hwy, Suite 101, Corona del Mar, CA 92625
6-3
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PRESIDENT
Debbie Stevens
VICE PRESIDENT
Sandie Haskell
SECRETARY
Elizabeth Torelli
Karen Tringali
TREASURER
Paul Blank
PAST PRESIDENT
Joy Brenner
CdM VILLAGE
Dennis Baker -W
Paul Bartlau-NW
Paul Blank -SW
Laura Curran -W
Bonnie Duckworth -SE
Glenn Highland -SE
Bryce Mott -NW
Linda Rasner-SW
Joe Stapleton -NE
Elizabeth Torelli-NE
IRVINE TERRACE
Tom Callister
HARBOR VIEW HILLS
Debbie Stevens
CORONA HIGHLANDS
Michael Pilsitz
Irene Villalobos
SHORE CLIFFS
Sandie Haskell
Amy Senk
CAMEO HIGHLANDS
Marjorie Sawyer
Karen Tringali
CAMEO SHORES
Doretta Ensign
Karen Mascitelli
SPYGLASS HILL
Brenda McCroskey
JASMINE CREEK
Larry Finn
THE TERRACES of CDM
Kathy Blank
Bev White
ATTACHMENT B
&01 ronc del G fff
RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION
V01 LIN I -FI -RS ADVOCATING FOR CORONA DEL MAR RESIDENTIAL. QUAI-11"Y UP LIFE. SINCE 1987
May 24, 2019
Mayor Diane Dixon
Members of the Newport Beach City Council
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Dear Mayor Dixon and City Council Members:
The Corona del Mar Residents Association (CdMRA) met with the Corona del Mar
Business Improvement District (BID) to review the Corona del Mar Parking Study
completed by Walker Consultants and review its recommendations. Based on a review of
the parking study, CdMRA supports the proposed change in the parking time limit from
one hour to two hours on East Pacific Coast Highway within Corona del Mar. We believe
that the change in time limits may help to increase parking along Pacific Coast Highway
and hopefully reduce the need to park within the residential areas of the CDM Village.
We appreciate your consideration of the BID's request and CdMRA supports the proposed
change in parking time limits.
Sincerely,
Debbie Stevens
President
3331 LAST COAtiFIIIGIIWAY#179 (A 1'.O. BOX 1500 £tib CORONA DF I. LIAR, CAI-IFORNIA 92625
949,478.2454 I CD:MRA.ORG I lNFO6.i CDMRA.ORG I FACEBOOK.COM/CE)MRA
ATTACHMENT C
WALKER MEMORANDUM
C O N S U L T A N T S PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
PROJECT i#37-8762.00
DATE:
August 20, 2018
TO:
Locey, Mary
COMPANY:
City of Newport Beach
ADDRESS:
100 Civic Center Drive
CITY/STATE:
Newport Beach, CA
COPY TO:
Crager, Chelsea, Zdeba, Benjamin, Turoff, Steffen
FROM:
Schleck, Tania
PROJECT NAME:
Corona del Mar Parking Study
PROJECT NUMBER:
37-8762.00
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The City of Newport Beach ("City") engaged Walker Consultants ("Walker") to conduct a study in the City's Corona
Del Mar ("CdM") commercial district ("the district") to provide data, analysis and recommendations to address
parking issues in the district. There are portions of the area that experience shortages of available parking, areas
with underutilized parking (parking spaces sit empty much or all of the time), and issues of spillover parking into
residential neighborhoods.
Based on discussions with the City's Business Improvement District ("BID") Parking Subcommittee ("the
Subcommittee"), Walker understands that existing parking requirements have at times been an impediment to
attracting new businesses to the CdM District. The primary goal of the study is to determine the feasibility and
potential impacts of reducing the minimum parking requirements in the CdM District.
In support of the above described goal, Walker completed the following tasks within the CdM district:
• Quantified current commercial parking demand (on -street and off-street);
• Identified locations of "hot spots" of high on -street demand;
• Identified locations of off-street parking available; and
• Compared City Code required parking to observed demand.
From this analysis, Walker made the following conclusions:
• The current commercial parking supply in the CdM district appears to have sufficient capacity to
accommodate observed commercial demand.
• The estimated blended parking ratio for commercial uses is lower than current City Code requirements
for commercial uses in the area.
• Available parking spaces were observed in off-street parking facilities.
• Commercial demand in residential areas was observed.
Walker presented the above described analysis and conclusions to the Subcommittee March 13, 2018.
6-5
WALKER MEMORANDUM
C O N S U L T A N T S PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
PROJECT ##37-8762.00
PURPOSE OF THIS MEMORANDUM
Based on the findings and conclusions presented in the March 13`x' meeting, the City and Subcommittee have
requested that Walker provide input on three proposed strategies to mitigate the parking concerns in the CdM
district:
1. Increase the parking time limit on Coast Highway, and on side streets from one-hour to two hours
2. Incorporate underutilized private parking supply in the public parking supply
3. Lower parking requirements in the CdM district
The following sections describe each strategy, provide the advantages and key considerations of each, and
Walker's recommendation.
EXTENDING TIME LIMITS ON COAST HIGHWAY AND SIDE STREETS
At the recommendation of the Committee, the City is considering increasing the time limits of the on -street
commercial spaces in the CdM district from one hour to two hours.
Advantages:
• Data from both our 2018 and 2009 analyses demonstrated underutilization of on -street parking spaces
along Coast Highway. Increasing the time limit in these locations is likely to increase the utilization of
otherwise unoccupied spaces.
• There are a variety of land uses in the CdM district that typically have a longer length of stay, such as nail
salons, beauty salons, or restaurants. Increasing the time limit of the on -street parking on Coast Highway
will help improve the public's access to these land uses, and may improve economic development in the
district.
• Furthermore, if parkers can park on Coast Highway for a longer duration of time, there may be less
spillover onto residential streets.
Key Considerations:
• Longer time limits at times may lead to the "abuse" of parking intended for visitors by employees who
frequently move their cars to parking in more convenient spaces. Sufficient parking enforcement is
recommended to minimize this behavior.
• The Coastal Zone boundary runs through the middle of Coast Highway. Therefore, the southern portion
of Coast Highway (and side streets) is within the Coastal Zone, and subject to California Coastal
Commission regulations ("CCC"). Therefore, changing the time restrictions on the south side of Coast
Highway may require the City to go through the CCC review process to change parking time limits, which
can be time intensive and require extensive City staff time and resources.
Recommendation:
Walker recommends that the City increase the time limits on Coast Highway, and sides streets, from one hour to
two hours. For consistency and ease of understanding on the part of the public, it is likely reasonable to do so
along Coast Highway in the entire district.
12
0=0
WALKER MEMORANDUM
C O N S U L T A N T S PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
PROJECT #37-8762.00
INCORPORATE UNDERUTILIZED PRIVATE PARKING LOTS INTO THE PUBLIC PARKING SUPPLY
The second strategy that Walker evaluated was the implementation of a program to incorporate the underutilized
private parking supply for public use.
As mentioned in the "Project Background" section of this memo, Walker observed availability in off-street parking
spaces. During field work, Walker observed that there were 586+ total off-street spaces available, including both
public and private spaces. While at times, constructing new public parking is discussed as a solution to the lack of
available public parking, aside from the enormous cost, a public parking facility tends to serve a limited area,
whereas available private parking spaces tend to be distributed, and able to serve, a broader area of the district.
In order to better utilize the current off-street parking, the District would benefit from the use of underutilized
privately -owned parking spaces including the formalization of a parking agreement with owners of private parking
spaces to make their parking spaces more widely available. These spaces could be made available to CdM district
employees through:
• The sharing and leasing of private spaces owned by businesses during low demand periods for the
individual private parking facilities;
• The leasing of private parking spaces by the City directly for CdM district employees;
• Including some private spaces in the public supply through a public parking signage, marketing and
branding program; and
• Encouragement of a "market" for private parking spaces by:
o Establishing a forum to communicate, educate, and establish a dialog with private owners
o Creating an online comprehensive list of parking facilities
o Leveraging technology
o "Branding" of a parking program for all public and private spaces.
The City of San Clemente provides a model program by which private parking spaces can be incorporated into the
public parking supply. Additional information about San Clemente's program can be found in the Attachment to
this memorandum.
Advantages:
Long term parkers, such as employees, would have an alternative to parking in the most popular locations
in the CdM district, thereby making on -street and other public parking in commercial areas more
accessible to visitors
• If more CdM district employees park in off-street spaces, there would likely be less spillover on residential
areas.
• Existing parking resources would be better managed.
Key Considerations:
• Management of a parking lot lease program requires extensive City staff time to not only conduct the
initial outreach to businesses, but also to maintain the operation of the program.
13
6-7
WALKER MEMORANDUM
C O N S U L T A N T S PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
PROJECT #37-8762.00
• The program may require specific language within the zoning code to allow for the sharing of private
spaces
• The City would need to allocate financial resources to paying the rental rate for the parking facilities, and
to maintain the parking facilities.
• Compared to constructing public parking spaces, the sharing of private parking spaces is far more cost
effective and efficient, devoting more land in the commercial district to businesses and other productive
uses and less land to asphalt, which does not provide a destination in and of itself.
As a first step, Walker recommends that the City evaluate whether the staff and resources are available to
implement a program similar to the one described above, or whether those staff and resources can be identified
and put in place. Walker recommends that at least one full-time staff member be allocated to implementing and
managing the program. Once the program is in place and operating, slightly less staff time may be required on an
ongoing basis. The City should consider implementing a pilot program in one or two private lots to make
underutilized private spaces available for employees in the CdM district. If the pilot program is successful, the City
should consider expanding it to the entire CdM district.
CHANGING CURRENT CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS IN THE CDM DISTRICT
As discussed in the March 13th Subcommittee meeting, Walker quantified commercial demand in the CdM district
through field work conducted Thursday February 8, 2018 and Saturday February 10, 2018.
Figure 1, below, summarizes observed commercial parking demand for each of the time periods, with the period
of peak demand highlighted in yellow. The figure compares the current commercial parking supply (both on -street
and off-street) to observed commercial parking demand. As shown in the figure, during all four periods of analysis,
the commercial supply was adequate to accommodate observed demand.
The "Potential Parking Demand" in the figure demonstrates observed demand increased by 20% to account for
the fact that February tends to have lower parking demand than the summer in coastal commercial districts.' The
potential blended parking ratio for the CdM district during the period of peak observed parking demand is 3.05 is
per thousand square feet of commercial floor area (ksf). The surprisingly low parking ratio is likely in part the result
of the sharing of on -street and other public parking between businesses that experience peaks in parking demand
at different hours.
' A 20% increase was made based on monthly factors recommended in the Walker/ULI Shared Parking Model.
14
WALKER MEMORANDUM
C O N S U L T A N T S PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
F;�"wo I I Jim,TtT'rl CC n)[TwrG;ll Pxlwl[" R�itio
THURSDAY
PROJECT 437-8762.00
SATURDAY
12:00 PM 7:00 PM 12:00 PM 7:00 PM
Observed Commercial
1,759
1,759
1,759
1,759
Parking Supply
Estimated Commercial
594,495
594,495
594,495
594,495
GSF
Observed Commercial
1,508
1,005
1,513
1,120
Parking Demand
Estimated Parking Ratio
(per ksf)
2.54
1.69
2.55
1.88
Potential Parking
1,810
11206
1,816
1,344
Demand (20% increase)
Potential Parking Ratio
3.04
2.03
3.05
2.26
(per ksf)
*Estimated Commercial GSF provided by City of Newport Beach City Staff.
Source: Walker Consultants, 2018
Walker compared this blended parking ratio for the district to the parking requirements per the Newport Beach
City Code. Figure 2, below, summarizes the parking requirements for the land uses within the CdM district area.
As shown in the figure, current requirements range from 3.3 per ksf to 12.5 per ksf, which are higher than the
projected blended commercial parking ratio described above.
15
.•
WALKER MEMORANDUM
C O N S U L T A N T S PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
PROJECT #37-8762.00
Figure 2: City of Newport Beach City Code Requirements
Community Shopping Center (<400 ksf)
Code Rqrn't (per ksf), unless
otherwise noted
4.5
Supermarket
5.0
Home Improvement Stores/Garden
3.3
Fine/Casual Dining
1-30-50sf net publicarea
Family Restaurant
1-30-50 sf net public area
Fast Casual/Fast Food
1 per 50sf
Museum/Aquarium
3.3
Health Club
4.5
Office <25,000sq ft
4.0
Medical/Dental Office
5.0
Bank (Drive In Branch)
4.0
Beauty Salons
4.0
Nail Salons
12.5
Source: Walker Consultants, City of Newport Beach, 2018
Advantages:
• The above described analysis demonstrates that the City's current parking requirements are higher than
the estimated commercial parking ratio in the CdM district, and that commercial parking supply exceeds
observed demand. These findings show that there is an opportunity to lower parking requirements in the
CdM district, possibly creating a district wide, blended parking requirement.
• Lowering the parking requirements in the district may decrease the barriers to entry for new businesses
in the district.
• Lowering parking requirements would reduce the overbuilding of parking, and encourage a more
pedestrian -friendly environment in the district.
Disadvantages:
• Changing the parking requirements in the CdM district would require extensive City staff time to
coordinate the process.
• Adjusting requirements would require an amendment to the local coastal plan and review by the CCC,
which can be a time and resource intensive process
• Given the spillover observed of commercial demand onto adjacent residential streets, the lowering of
requirements would ideally be coupled with implementing a residential parking permit program. In
Walker's experience, implementing a permit program with the Coastal Zone can be a difficult process, as
permits can be seen as restricting public access to the coast. However, there are cases to be made that
parking in residential and commercial areas near the coast tend not to be used by visitors seeking to access
the coast.
z
6-10
WALKER MEMORANDUM
C O N S U L T A N T S PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
PROJECT #37-8762.00
Recommendation:
Walker recommends that the City first evaluate whether there are sufficient staff resources to lead the process of
lowering parking requirements in the CdM district. If so, Walker recommends that a blended parking requirement
be applied to all of the commercial uses within CdM district, rather applying parking requirements on a use by use
basis. Adjusting the parking requirements should be coupled with implementation of a residential parking permit
program to mitigate spillover of parking onto residential streets. A public outreach process should be conducted
which includes representatives from the business community and residents.
17
6-11
WALKER ATTACHMENT
CONSULTANTS
SAN CLEMENTE PRIVATE PARKING LOT LEASE PROGRAM'
Downtown San Clemente is a popular destination frequented by both residents and visitors. The core of San
Clemente's downtown experiences parking shortages at peak times. When the City studied the parking supply it
was found that although the public parking lots were at or near capacity there was a surplus of 400 spaces in the
private parking lots. Rather than constructing new parking resources, which is expensive, San Clemente has
developed the Parking Lot Lease Program ("the program"). The cost is equivalent to maintaining a parking
structure without the capital costs for the purchase of land and improvements. Put simply, the program opens
the surplus parking in private lots by converting underutilized private parking lots to public lots, thereby increasing
their usage and available parking downtown.
The program came about as a result of complaints by downtown merchants that there was not an adequate supply
of parking in the downtown area. To understand parking dynamics in the downtown, San Clemente hired Walker
Parking Consultants in 2002 to develop a parking study and survey that analyzed parking supply and demand. The
survey was conducted during the mid -summer, the peak parking demand period for this beachside community.
The analysis concluded that the public parking spaces were heavily utilized while the private parking spaces,
although in convenient locations, were not heavily utilized. The private parking lots were averaging 50% capacity
utilization during peak demand periods. At the same time the public parking resources (public lots and public
street parking) were nearly 100% utilized.
Walker and the City realized that the perceived deficiency of parking in downtown was actually a lack of available
and convenient public parking, rather than a critical shortage of parking overall. Walker recommended that the
City increase its effective supply of parking, and the perception of available parking, by making the underutilized
private parking lots open to the public. It was understood that 100% conversion of private lots was not necessary.
Rather, the conversion of several key private lots to public close to the downtown core was the goal.
The challenge in leasing the private lots was to persuade property owners of the benefits of leasing their private
parking lots. The City was able to identify several strong incentives that property owners wanted. Executed
leases often included the following terms (refer to attachment 5 for sample lease):
• Rental rate of approximately $350.00/month/10 spaces; and
• City funded parking lot improvements including slurry seal and restriping; and
• City maintenance of parking lots; and
• City parking enforcement (which owners are reluctant to do because they do not want to offend their
customers); and
• City hold harmless and indemnify private property owners from liability resulting from public use; and
• Wayfinding signage identifying the private lots as public lots; and
• Lease term of 1 -year with automatic 30 -day renewal thereafter (short term leases are more appealing to
property owners who are considering future development of their property).
The terms of the lease proved to be enticing to private parking lot owners. Since the adoption of the program in
2003, nine property owners have participated in the program for an increase of 120 public spaces to the previously
pool of 803 public parking spaces in the downtown, resulting in a 15% increase in the effective supply of public
parking. Recent Walker studies (2006, 2008 and 2010), confirm that the privately -owned lots that have been
converted to public lots are now more effectively utilized (averaging 80% utilization).
1 The information contained in this Appendix is a summary of the City of San Clemente's private parking lot lease program, as submitted in
2012 by the City as a nomination for an American Planning Association, Orange County section, Award for Outstanding Planning
Implementation. The program was the recipient of the award.
6-12
This program demonstrates how downtowns can increase their effective supply of public parking without a large
commitment of public dollars. This program is unique because rather than increasing the overall parking supply
by way of physical construction, better management of parking resources is employed by making better use of
private parking supply by converting private lots to public use. The program can be successfully implemented in
other communities that have an underutilized private parking supply. All it takes is some City initiative in opening
private parking lots for public use and then trusting in the ability of smart entrepreneurial property owners to see
the benefits of the program.
6-13
ATTACHMENT D
RESOLUTION NO. 2019- 68
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, LIMITING THE
PARKING OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN STREETS AND
REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 2016-36
WHEREAS, Newport Beach Municipal Code Section 12.44.010(8) provides that
when authorized signs are in place giving notice thereof, no person shall stop, stand, or
park any vehicle between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. of any day for a period of
time longer than two (2) hours upon such streets or portions thereof as the City Council
shall designate by resolution;
WHEREAS, Newport Beach Municipal Code Section 12.44.010(E) authorizes the
City Council to vary the hours or days of parking restrictions when special parking or traffic
conditions exist; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority found in Sections 12.44.010(B) and (E), the
City Council adopted Resolution No. 2016-36 establishing a comprehensive set of parking
regulations within the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach resolves as
follows:
Section 1: The recitals provided in this resolution are true and correct and are
incorporated into the operative part of this resolution.
Section 2: The City Council does hereby repeal Resolution No. 2016-36 and
amend the parking regulations based upon the special parking and traffic conditions that
currently exist within the City. The following parking restrictions shall apply:
1. The parking of vehicles between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on
school days is limited to two (2) hours on the following streets:
St. James Road 15th Street to and including 625 on the north
side and on the south side from 15th Street to
and including 636 St. James Road.
Signal Road 15th Street southerly to and including 418 on the
east side and 419 on the west side of Signal
Road.
6-14
Resolution 2019 -
Page 2 of 6
Snug Harbor Road Clay Street southerly to and including 406 on
the east side and 401 on the west side of Snug
Harbor Road.
Pirate Road Clay Street southerly to and including 424 on
the east side and 427 on the west side of Pirate
Road.
Clay Street South side, St. Andrews to 15th Street.
St. Andrews Road 15th Street to Haven Place; Clay Street to alley
south of Clay on the west side; Clay Street to
and including 400 on the east side of St.
Andrews Road.
15th Street North side, Irvine Avenue to Michael Place; Clay
Street to Kings Place. South side, alley west of
Irvine Avenue to Irvine Avenue; 210 feet east of
Irvine Avenue to 310 feet east of Irvine Avenue;
St. Andrews Road to Kings Place.
Irvine Avenue West side, 15th Street to Laurel Place.
Laurel Place Irvine Avenue to westerly terminus of Laurel
Place.
Holly Lane Irvine Avenue north side to and including 2214
on the north side and 2321 on the south side.
Michael Place 15th Street to and including 601 on the west
side and 620 on the east side.
Haven Place Both sides from St. Andrews Road to Irvine
Avenue.
Fullerton Avenue 15th Street to and including 542 on the east side
and 543 on the west side.
6-15
Resolution 2019 -
Page 3 of 6
2. The parking of vehicles between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. daily
is limited to two (2) hours on the following streets:
Balboa Boulevard
Marine Avenue
Newport Center Drive East
The south side from McFadden Place to 74 feet
west of the centerline of 20th Street.
From the alley south of North Bay Front to 60
feet south of Park Avenue.
Newport Center Drive West
3. The parking of vehicles between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
except Sunday and holidays, is limited to two (2) hours on the following street:
Avon Street Tustin Avenue to Riverside Avenue.
4. The parking of vehicles between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.,
except Saturday, Sunday, and holidays, is limited to two (2) hours on the following streets:
16th Street Babcock Street to Placentia Avenue, except the
easterly 220 feet on the south side.
Bayview Way From Jamboree Road to the easterly terminus
of Bayview Way.
5. The parking of vehicles between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m.,
except Saturday, Sunday, and holidays, is limited to two (2) hours on the following streets:
Buckingham Lane Easterly side from Westcliff Drive to Bedford
Lane.
Riverside Avenue Northwest side from a point beginning 418 feet
from the centerline of Riverside Avenue at Cliff
Drive and ending 563 feet from that centerline.
6-16
Resolution 2019 -
Page 4 of 6
6. The parking of vehicles between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.,
Monday through Thursday, except holidays, is limited to two (2) hours on the following
street:
Clubhouse Avenue Short Street to the Rialto.
7. The parking of vehicles between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.,
Tuesday through Thursday, except holidays, is limited to two (2) hours on the following
streets:
Clubhouse Avenue Short Street to the Rivo Alto.
Short Street Newport Boulevard to Clubhouse Avenue.
8. The parking of vehicles between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on
weekdays is limited to two (2) hours on the following streets:
Tustin Avenue Avon Street to 300 feet northerly of Avon Street.
Ocean View Tustin Avenue to 350 feet northerly of Tustin
Avenue.
9. The parking of vehicles between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.
Monday through Saturday is limited to two (2) hours on the following street:
Cliff Drive South side from the westerly limit of Cliff Drive
Park to San Bernardino Avenue.
10. The parking of vehicles between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. daily
is limited to two (2) hours on the following streets (excluding designated short term and
loading zones):
East Coast Highway South side from Acacia Avenue to Begonia
Avenue and Carnation Avenue to Seaward
Road; North side from Seaward Road to Dahlia
Avenue.
Hazel Drive East Coast Highway to alley north of East Coast
Highway.
6-17
Resolution 2019 -
Page 5 of 6
Poppy Avenue East Coast Highway to alley north of East Coast
Highway.
Poinsettia Avenue East Coast Highway to alley north of East Coast
Highway; East Coast Highway to alley south of
East Coast Highway.
Orchid Avenue East Coast Highway to alley north of East Coast
Highway; East Coast Highway to alley south of
East Coast Highway.
Narcissus Avenue East Coast Highway to alley north of East Coast
Highway; East Coast Highway to alley south of
East Coast Highway.
Marigold Avenue East Coast Highway to alley north of East Coast
Highway; East Coast Highway to alley south of
East Coast Highway.
Larkspur Avenue East Coast Highway to 60 feet south of East
Coast Highway.
Jasmine Avenue East Coast Highway to 40 feet south of East
Coast Highway; East Coast Highway to
Second Avenue.
Iris Avenue East Coast Highway to 60 feet south of East
Coast Highway.
Heliotrope Avenue East Coast Highway to 90 feet south of East
Coast Highway; East Coast Highway to Third
Avenue.
Fernleaf Avenue East Coast Highway to 100 feet south of East
Coast Highway.
Dahlia Avenue East Coast Highway to Fifth Avenue.
Resolution 2019 -
Page 6 of 6
The City Traffic Engineer is hereby directed to erect all necessary signs at the
above locations to indicate the parking restrictions contained herein.
Section 3: Any other prior resolution, or parts thereof, in conflict herewith is
superseded, repealed and replaced by Resolution No. 2019- .
Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution
is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the
validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this resolution. The City Council
hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution, and each section, subsection,
sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 5: The City Council finds the adoption of this resolution is not subject to
the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the
activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378)
of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3,
because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or
indirectly.
Section 6: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the
City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting the resolution.
ADOPTED this 9th day of July, 2019.
Diane B. Dixon
Mayor
ATTEST:
Leilani I. Brown
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
JU "-� ::$c
Aaron C. Harp
City Attorney
6-19