HomeMy WebLinkAboutSS4 - Marine Ave Tree Maintenance - PowerPointIan
U1
I_, roster
August 13, 2019
Item No. SS4
City Council Study Session
August 13, 2019
on
Marine Avenue
Tree Trimming &
Maintenance Overview
Public Works Department
Municipal Operation Division
Some Background Leading to this
Discussion
In 2015, some members of the Balboa Island Community and their
Association's including the Balboa Island Improvement Association, Little
Island Association and Marine Avenue Merchants Association began
discussions with regard to the potential rehabilitation of Marine Avenue
Former City Councilmember Ed Selich requested, and City Council approved
$250,000 in funding within the FY 16-17 Capital Improvement Program
budget for Development of Concepts Plans, and possibly eventual design
The Island Community then set up a Marine Avenue Committee that
included a wide Cross Section of folks
City staff attended meetings as well as arranged for needed Design
Consulting Services to assist the Committee with development of Concepts
Plans to be reviewed and discussed with the Island Community
Some Background Leading to this
Discussion
City Staff advised the committee early on that many of the trees were in
declining health, and/or would have stability, root damage and accelerated
health decline if all the existing supporting concrete was removed
Objective was to develop an Island -Wide Consensus on a Preferred Marine
Ave Conceptual Design that would then be presented to the City Council for
review and approval
The Marine Avenue Committee held several meetings (open to the public) to
discuss and develop Concept Plans.
The Committee held two Open Houses (May, 9 2018 & June 9, 2019) at the
Island Fire Station to solicit Community Options and Comments on Draft
Concepts
During these Open Houses, discussions regarding the Disposition of the
Current Street Trees began to arise
Some Background Leading to this
Discussion
Around January 2019, an independent mailer was distributed to Residents
requesting that they review and vote on revitalizing Marine Avenue in a
"Quaint Historical" or a "Classic Contemporary" style.
With this survey and results arose an organization known as the
"Balboa Island Preservation Association" or BIPA which advocated that any
redevelopment of Marine Ave should maintain the Quaint Historical look &
feel, and that the existing Eucalyptus trees needed to be maintained in place
Around March 2019, the Committee and City staff were advised that an
independent Arborist Review and Report of the Marine Avenue Street Trees
had been prepared by the Balboa Island Preservation Association
This was followed by further criticism by the BIPA and Mr. Applegate of the
City's Annual Marine Avenue Tree Inspection/Trimmed conducted by the
City's Contractor Great Scott on March 11th and 12th
Some Background Leading to this
Discussion
As of this date, no further direction has taken place with regard to further
development of a revitalization project concept plan for Marine Avenue
Some of the Confusion folks are having is that:
There is a potential Project being discussed that could effect the
existing trees. That Conversation has not been completed nor finalized
And there is the on-going Maintenance of the Existing Trees that will
require the removal and replacement of some trees
Contrary to some statements - the City is not intentionally overly
maintaining or removing the existing Eucalyptus Trees on Marine Ave to
make way for, or to support the potential project
For more General Overall Information on the City's Tree Management &
Maintenance Program — Please view the February 12, 2019 City Council
Meeting — Item SS3 — "Overview of City Trees"
Background on Marine Ave Trees
Eucalyptus trees first appear in 1920's on the 200 Block of Marine Avenue
Eucalyptus species appears to be mainly "Flooded Gum" (Eucalyptus rudis)
Today, there are 42 Trees on Marine Avenue composed of five types of
Eucalyptus and Corymbia species.
predominate species
"Lemon -Scented Gum" is the
Background on Marine Ave Trees
The Eucalyptus on Marine Ave. were adopted as Special Neighborhood
trees in City Council Policy on November 28, 1988
The Trees appear to have been topped prior to the City's adoption of
International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) standards, up through the early
1980's
Prior to 1993, City crews
did not have capacity to
trim over 55 -feet
In 1994, first tree
maintenance contractor,
West Coast Arborists,
attempted corrective and
structural pruning
Council Policy G-1
The City Classifies Public Trees in one of Three Categories:
Special Trees (Landmark, Dedicated or Neighborhood Trees)
Problem Trees
All Other Trees
It is the City's policy to retain City trees categorized as Special Trees
(Neighborhood Trees) that by their unusual size, number, species, or location
lend o special character to o residential, commercial, or business area
Special Trees shall be retained, unless there are overriding problems, such
as death, disease, or the creation of a hazardous situation, which require
their removal
Council Policy G-1
Prior to consideration for any removal of a Special Tree, Staff shall
prepare a report identifying and implementing specific treatment to
retain the tree. If specific treatment is unsuccessful or impractical in
retaining a tree, then a full staff report shall be made to the Parks
Beaches and Recreation [PB&R] Commission.
Specific Past and on-going Treatments
Minor root pruning and shaving to accommodate hardscape repairs.
Deferred hardscape maintenance
Ramping with asphalt patches. Repeated grinding of lifting sidewalks
Removal and resetting of hardscape (curb, sidewalks pavements)
Annual inspection and trimming
Reviews by Consulting Arborists
Treatments of diseases and insects (Lerp Psyllid and Tortoise Beetle)
Supplemental irrigation and nutrition via water truck
Site Conditions
Very Crowded Pedestrian Sidewalks
and Street Parking underneath
Trees on Marine Ave (busy business,
tourist area)
Small Tree Wells, surrounded by
concrete in various states
(restricts air/water/nutrients to roots)
No Supplemental Irrigation
Shallow Available Root Growth Area due to High Salt Water Table
Years of Tree Root Crowns covered by Decomposed Granite, then more
recently Artificial Turf (installed by BIIA).
Canopies in Close Proximity to Buildings / Roofs and Signage
Maintenance History
For the past 25 years, the City has Inspected and Trimmed all
Marine Ave Trees Annually
This occurs over multiple days in the early morning, so as to
minimize disruption to businesses - last service on 3/11/19-
3/12/19)
Over the past 25 years, the City has Removed and Replaced
approximately 30% (20-25) of the Eucalyptus Trees.
In May 2017, based on Risk Assessments Review, PB&R
approved the removal of two Special Eucalyptus Trees (at
318 and 326 Marine)
The City Responds annually to Large Limb Breakages, typically
during Storm Events and Santa Ana Winds.
Prior Replacements were composed of Lemon -Scented Gums &
Water Gums Eucalyptus Trees, and more recently African Tulip &
Gingko trees.
Considering the location, older trees are reaching the end of
their typical lifespan (50-60 years)
Dctober Za
Eucalyptus in Similar Condition in other
- `aw
Cities
Laguna Beach
Broadway
Street
High
Pedestrian,
Parking and
Vehicle Traffic
Similar
Conservative
4q Trimming
i* % -%W
A%K- %011 It I
iimilar Condition in
Cities
Laguna Beach
Broadway
Street
High
Pedestrian,
Parking and
Vehicle Traffic
Similar
Conservative
Trimming
other
Eucalyptus in Similar Condition in other
Cities
Mission Viejo
Alicia Parkway
Narrow
Median High
Volume Travel
Lanes
Similar
Conservative
Trimming
Consulting Arborist Reports
Arborgate Consulting Report
Author -Greg Applegate, Consulting Arborist
Requested and funded by Jodi Bole & Balboa Island Preservation Association
Report designated as a "Tree Protection" Report
Summary Comments on current and future tree maintenance
Concerned with Lions -Tailing, structural pruning, and other pruning
concerns
Concerned about artificial turf and buried root crowns
Recommendations on protection of trees during construction and repairs
Suggests no root pruning 3 to 5 times the diameter of the tree
Included Tree health and condition matrix
Recommendations include Three Eucalyptus Tree Removals
Recommends a Hazard Analysis by a Tree Risk Professional versed in Risk
Analysis
Walt Warriner Consulting Report
Author -Walt Warriner, Consulting Arborist
Contracted by the City of Newport Beach
Conducted a Tree Risk Assessment and Provided Recommendations
Risk Assessment Procedure:
Timeframe applied
Site factors assessed — "Tree stability is separate from Tree
Health"
Crown considerations: live crown ratio, crown symmetry, and
branching issues (lions -tailing)
Root conditions and trunk issues
Potential Targets
Risk Categorization
Walt Warriner Consulting Report
Continued
Likelihood of Failure of a Specific Tree Part is compared with Likelihood of
the Specific Tree Part Impacting an Object of Concern
The result of the above analysis is then compared to the Consequences of
Failure
Most Consequences for Marine Avenue were Rated at Severe
The Overall Risk Rating was deemed High for 27 trees and Moderate for
10 trees
The Consultant Recommends Removal of all 27 trees with a high risk
rating and Reassessment in one year of trees with moderate risk
C
Sample ISA Tree Risk Assessment
Form
Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form
Ff]dre55i iIPP IOCd Or. 11 �ctitrl ye r� Trrr n[,' Im SheEi q-
Tra-r.r��r. cr..-`?P 5 CcwxFt"i�fLi4i5i S•L�� �.. :owr:Lrnad dig. -Sia-L%r
Ass[;sor±s: .. v�w� Tnnln n: -d nrce frame
Tareat Acv+ccrnaM
nrulmno
`
r
$z FF -1 p ;:€
1aj C•J �..•,
P 4+ {3t Ll
Hlstoryoffallures_ 1r'i0' Ic�:.V'��Pa�rPrM1'Fla[L11�cu
SiLecha7'4a Nom_❑Gr3Ea Lla',ILr]Si:Gcicarirg❑CMf�Oso lhy:ir9�p• H"nrc:.tz g3's(-::rihc S: c;C_. �'T_,j'
So4uandldw'6 limil[Mr. in,lnmf3firur..2d❑ 5FAImC Cxn-a..ed Q'j 4F'rnrN anrr,ims� % auL ire �1
vrp,aYling wlnd dirr.� .`�'x�Cornmon weadaef 5(1 org,•And5 _1 .tinrwO Inzr. rain L] CesviLe <r •t Imo- {K-R<•�ti _ i'„u,�
W7 H9.Ith arid$pedes Profile
vigor l:ra•❑ h.c nut Hlhip Foliage Nab{ua "I..0Nnq�'[de r�f7 rlx:ra.dm, Chlan]tl[..-t W.,.Hc'Z,
Festsfalotic .4�: py]• f!!'7 JIV�L4 f�j—�Tti�f �p AfG��mF^
Spuciusf ilurcpfarde @'�,[I es l'T'u I1fC HGM!YYl.so-r nr• �'•'S r-r'�'' `.s'F"'f/
L09 FBLN Y5
Wind rapo>ure Pro[e::e]7 tarda alit tLi,d Tn,nrli,g 4lnr't'P-✓.1 S i� {va uDym E1�, S-11 LJ M2,i-rn❑ z1,e
Lrawnd-ily SPd SE❑ RCIm2E'JVDCr6cCJ nlc�for branches frxC Yorrnn n'e'• Nnrx/MisrcmrfMoesL
Re a ecmd chE MMM trete[-
Tree Defects and Conditions Alfacdmw Shv kclil-d pf
�
w.F�ni'k-
Y- 1-1 .. O9nn
M
'^isk G-rcWricarlpn
❑Jrhsre; CatiI,gh'ri,: dairokeC
7pa_I: ryd, .,-�..7 G -Lux'. rr.�r-II r-fac jii��
f:Vdnnnrrt —1,
_i akxr,+le,:== N•an Lei f: ar.'_la.
•Alehelb-W,� V-oir^;N-hoe
]crdllnn ^xj
�W m1eTd?a ar2r: §ec1
-io[s ar:ruh bil,-.d• Jn l:,e' Amlot prvnrrt,Qr
RIQ
Pndiinl; Ilfsl uY r
iaixi J
rl ranlm�.'rnl' inrh7 odd• cdx
k•155 rC '?" T� "P I ar
an d!x .0 a` Ilirn.r.
r. j -j 7 Tr'PI."d W L r..n:cirnnr:C
heart. xi d -C
R., Lv : 7 1)-,
7-vpera'Frmd' �ILL�'cc
�
„5
.h,r rnnlsl
of c-mx•.r.
R -Scor - Iall❑jsl v�
LAY �r -earl I tkT 40
road mdeleee ,•'.•.❑ win rr -c
^
tar: 5'falW17-, L -,
la,dnndeFcr[ 'k...c U.- t]rd J-ele
` `ter I
lkdiFmdurh-iu'e 'i A-11 r.01 G3�•xF..1 0 ---0
� yI_]dllr
UkeiF.W.Ilail- I,iaebaa-❑ F,;U40 I - A, ltl�M
Y':'' /
-Trunk-
- R. azyd R -t COW -
oaeJ,'Miwl.^Clark❑ % bhrornalbl �xtrre.4alV:C/
rl f
retial L.�ntd•'fa%t .'Sitla uclRr� Stemgi+iing0
{uu'1ilireM 5F2rti �`� nF VFC-oark� Cr�]3 S7
[ka: � GCWi'� :onk�M�±Y:icarSC
5eynn"d [Ianap.�d.rar0 L:nkrrarSall:if+,r7s LJ 5apuose11
OON_ ❑
Hg'rtnlr 5darnaE,eC RrrAcud ��cryk Cu iks:Llu:lr"Vrs❑
Gad:sf� L� DLE.r:a irm li -kk a- -
�� ��
CaA1'Y.•T�csh.,le 'S'iri.. �epUi F-laPef 13
�Ll;,-.�-dry=b
P-Mplar- i?ir.O,fShe Sl[ak-Q
LednJWt• Icmecreili
'��,.w �� 1
k-cin'ine dnrrh
r
pxsp:aL-e l✓u+•Lh --
,�gc
^lartEtlon�ElaFco,arn I' a
5:cnc'dol Wi of' -
_Gt-�.
Iv,
Rart S't2 2 L' Fa1� �
Pat -51 Le �-'� Niswii
W.dO d;h. r.1a0 -r ❑ P'oderxle0/�y:ifidnl LY
Load mdd- W, 0 MIn_r 0 -d.-Cl54N-'Cr"
Eklihwduf Fe#ufe li,yr'2a3VeC Nwi I' dYpI H I -n-0
LkNllreeeafflr . r hIwol -o rrcbrne 1M121:0
M
'^isk G-rcWricarlpn
.._...--
'{iV.eJiiiadl .Likllihoo V.or Imost _ r
of biwR ' vrrvlrnv
ImminAnT IIrfIIP�N; SAMP'1rFtlt Ilk -1•; 'ik=w I':' _ 1.J• -
Ilrilif:i/'. .Jrtlilc-y'::. Sumr.-:iiiiC is':.I::'. mlr
. rui;,wi,' ;
".PiedHlg.=! Lnlilcrr Inll.r.:r sem. '....! IR^In.:nl"PL,ra.Jll.Sfx:j .. .......
lmprv6y 61c _:rr ,JI111iG1;l.-:: "dilikely �.�C. _—.......
',4,Inx ?. Rlxr rAreU' r1F.]'k�
.j
II
....15fY.kliP.jY': . r, •r r•m� �:'.. _.._._...
,
co_ e[mar llko Im".: •;; Mt+r+€'ate. .: k{a'�Kia.c � •r�'�I
-munllTmY .. : ',, m',.:::'i :�Li.:': •:' Cra �.. �.,•... �+�
fvp[es, .mplanaclon s_aescn peons 'r�• i
M la -Hun nppnns
_ Residual risk
„_,,, ,,, ReaidoaE ri •
Ovrrnll treydel[ r b4 q cnC 'A:d rL-C W,f .rir❑
overall -dual risk rise_ Drs.r C 'rlDd--L I-�h 0 —r-7 F-mmendeo Inspection Imefual .
D.. blfiroi LJPr_i y,�fyjr�y'f'.'4duancea a35055mane n 9 dea:11u C}tirTppeif ..xanr yy,,.� _
Inaoendon iimihrtiore LRiJhnr rv•iisinl11-y IA-n:I-Ltr-tco.3r L,llfie ]-auiL• iJ-uy-'N R—•� -
nn-,r,drrx.n Mvr.a lr:Irr�m•r.�r.ai£, ra- ... �i.i.d,I 1"[. !Sm l xr]
--�-
II:ar-
Fallrr:. -01 llnpar[I Ce�n,egcence-
xral
]crdllnn ^xj
`alI[Ire
Imla•sl •+ i
�Y....
RIQ
` `ter I
(.. G�pr'lI �'•
•Y�
Y':'' /
.�W.L
wv:—
' ate,. � I
I . ❑J 4
L �
�� ��
�d
i.ffs
.._...--
'{iV.eJiiiadl .Likllihoo V.or Imost _ r
of biwR ' vrrvlrnv
ImminAnT IIrfIIP�N; SAMP'1rFtlt Ilk -1•; 'ik=w I':' _ 1.J• -
Ilrilif:i/'. .Jrtlilc-y'::. Sumr.-:iiiiC is':.I::'. mlr
. rui;,wi,' ;
".PiedHlg.=! Lnlilcrr Inll.r.:r sem. '....! IR^In.:nl"PL,ra.Jll.Sfx:j .. .......
lmprv6y 61c _:rr ,JI111iG1;l.-:: "dilikely �.�C. _—.......
',4,Inx ?. Rlxr rAreU' r1F.]'k�
.j
II
....15fY.kliP.jY': . r, •r r•m� �:'.. _.._._...
,
co_ e[mar llko Im".: •;; Mt+r+€'ate. .: k{a'�Kia.c � •r�'�I
-munllTmY .. : ',, m',.:::'i :�Li.:': •:' Cra �.. �.,•... �+�
fvp[es, .mplanaclon s_aescn peons 'r�• i
M la -Hun nppnns
_ Residual risk
„_,,, ,,, ReaidoaE ri •
Ovrrnll treydel[ r b4 q cnC 'A:d rL-C W,f .rir❑
overall -dual risk rise_ Drs.r C 'rlDd--L I-�h 0 —r-7 F-mmendeo Inspection Imefual .
D.. blfiroi LJPr_i y,�fyjr�y'f'.'4duancea a35055mane n 9 dea:11u C}tirTppeif ..xanr yy,,.� _
Inaoendon iimihrtiore LRiJhnr rv•iisinl11-y IA-n:I-Ltr-tco.3r L,llfie ]-auiL• iJ-uy-'N R—•� -
nn-,r,drrx.n Mvr.a lr:Irr�m•r.�r.ai£, ra- ... �i.i.d,I 1"[. !Sm l xr]
City Arborist Review & Recommendations
Continue Annual Inspections and Pruning with Emphasis in Crown
Restoration (where possible).
Concur that 27 trees are in the High -Risk Category due to Risk of Whole
Tree or Large Limb Failure.
Based on a Triage System, and as an Urban Forestry Management Principle:
Remove 10 High -Risk Eucalyptus Trees this year (2019/20). The Trees
Identified have Significant Defects in the Canopy, the Root System &
Trunk.
Possibly Remove up to 17 (or more) High -Risk Eucalyptus Trees in the
Following Two / Three Years, per Re -Assessment. These Trees Primarily
have Significant Defects in the Canopy Only, which would relate to a
Large Limb Failure (still severe) vs. a Whole Tree Failure (more severe) per
the above trees.
Summary of Recommendations
Based on Re -Assessment
Arborgate
WaltWarriner
City Arborist
Report
Report
Review
Maintenance
Yes
Yes
Yes
Review
Risk Assessment
No
Yes
Partial
Included
Eucalyptus
Year I = 10
Removals
3
27+
Recommended
SubsequentYears
= 17+
Based on Re -Assessment
+� Y
" -"Q ONYX AYES
noO �.J �' Nr.• N N N `N N or n I N� moi`"- N _sp, m•
. � • Gyym� � M M- M � � "? , �� � �� N N .. n
W., TREE ACTION PLAN
■ � gyp'
F LOW to MODERATE RISK
r I .-- M Fd'^ N� 4 p .� :rte. 0•� - �8 N N N � �. y
RISK/MONITORINGHIGH
t
1 ti.rAMETHYSTiAVE� ' yHIGH RISK/PROPO
�` 4•F M m
Xi
VACANT _
. ._aarl gnu • !, o- ` : t — i-rj _1:1_!1 �Si I-AI%M M&j d>�IJ---
49L 'be ry'7 N
r3
'0 334'
O
N
AK
LEI"�L
DR"'.
BoSDABALONE
C
V054
�, ��
' �' (.� [+}
�f M
d V
�� � O ' m � M�b
N
d �
N
W
cp•
�
O �
tO
N
rD
G R
A N D
C A N
A L
_
GRAND.C'
N
ar
_AN'AL•
1co
rN
M
�-�
Vc*Y
I
c1T
@�
$MARINE 4NE• `
■ s a
. Ai ", -
,:.�
Z�
V
..
LUJ
a
+� Y
" -"Q ONYX AYES
noO �.J �' Nr.• N N N `N N or n I N� moi`"- N _sp, m•
. � • Gyym� � M M- M � � "? , �� � �� N N .. n
W., TREE ACTION PLAN
■ � gyp'
F LOW to MODERATE RISK
r I .-- M Fd'^ N� 4 p .� :rte. 0•� - �8 N N N � �. y
RISK/MONITORINGHIGH
t
1 ti.rAMETHYSTiAVE� ' yHIGH RISK/PROPO
�` 4•F M m
Xi
VACANT _
. ._aarl gnu • !, o- ` : t — i-rj _1:1_!1 �Si I-AI%M M&j d>�IJ---
r3
'0 334'
O
N
N
+� Y
" -"Q ONYX AYES
noO �.J �' Nr.• N N N `N N or n I N� moi`"- N _sp, m•
. � • Gyym� � M M- M � � "? , �� � �� N N .. n
W., TREE ACTION PLAN
■ � gyp'
F LOW to MODERATE RISK
r I .-- M Fd'^ N� 4 p .� :rte. 0•� - �8 N N N � �. y
RISK/MONITORINGHIGH
t
1 ti.rAMETHYSTiAVE� ' yHIGH RISK/PROPO
�` 4•F M m
Xi
VACANT _
. ._aarl gnu • !, o- ` : t — i-rj _1:1_!1 �Si I-AI%M M&j d>�IJ---
Overview of Tree Evaluation
(10 High -Risk Trees)
Common Terms and Meaning
Asymmetrical - having parts or aspects that are not equal or equivalent;
unequal in some respect
Co -Dominant Limbs - two or more branches with the same diameter and
height that have grown from the same point of origin
Dieback - a condition in which a tree begins to die from the tip of its leaves
or roots inward, owing to disease or an unfavorable environment
Contact Growth - when tree roots or trunks grow over or around an object it
has come in contact with
Heartwood Decay - caused by a fungus that deteriorates the inner wood of a
tree (naturally occurring tree process)
Deadwood - Dead branches on a tree
Live Crown Ratio - ratio of crown height to total tree height, (percentage of
a tree's total height that has foliage); indicator of tree vigor
Root Plate - part of the root system (excluding the small, outermost roots)
needed to keep a tree "windfirm".
210 Marine Ave.
Asymmetrical
Co -Dominant Limbs
Dieback
Contact Growth
Suspected Heartwood Decay
- %ILY IS I
r�
A
„i 4
16 it
A
f
:f
x
1�
SPOU VAMI
Lq
312 Marine Ave.
Asymmetrical
Poor Overall Health
Significant Leaning Trunk
Suspected Heartwood Decay
Root Pruning for Sidewalk
Work
11,
?'uR,
319 Marine Ave.
Asymmetrical
15% Live Crown Ratio
Significant Leaning Trunk
Root Pruned / Decayed
Heaving Sidewalk
' illll IIIIIItlIII111111N111111111111
TOr
315 Marine Ave.
Dead Tree
High -Risk, Necessitates
Imminent Removal
Staff has scheduled removal for
this Fall
PB&R notified at August
meeting
w
`X
4t
i
MIA,
E
4V
dE
'oil
Arm
I A-
Current Vacant Tree Sites
Total of 5 Vacant Tree Well locations currently
207 Marine Ave
Y�
302 Marine Ave
301 Marine Ave
Proposed Path Forward Regarding
Marine Avenue Tree Maintenance
Remove Current Dead Tree at 315 Marine just after Labor Day. The Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Commission was advised and confirmed this action
at their August Meeting
Provide Report and Recommend Removal of the other 9 High Risk Trees
discussed above to the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission in
September. Upon their Concurrence, Schedule and Remove these trees
Make any Necessary Hardscape Repairs Around existing Tree Wells where
trees were removed such as uplifted and/or broken sidewalk or curb
Replant all 15 Tree Wells with 24" Box Eucalyptus
(5 currently vacant and 10 from removals)
Arrange for on-going Watering of new Trees by Water Truck or Merchant
Volunteer
Continue with Annual Inspection and Trimming of All Marine Ave Trees
Examples of 24" Box Eucalyptus
Ll
I
1
4 „
Eucalyptus trees are Rapid Growers with approximately 60 percent of
their growth established within the first 10 years
/off
�,ro \
Comments/Questions
Your Public Works Department
Protecting and Providing Quality
Public Improvements and Services