HomeMy WebLinkAboutX2017-3130 - SoilsCOLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL
470 WALD
IRVINE, CA 92618
PHONE (949) 872-2582
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
Email; Lashoemaker@cs.com
June 24, 2018
Mark Haupert
2911 E La Palma Ave.
Anaheim, CA 92806
Attention: Mr. Mark Haupert
Subject: Geotechnical Report of Precise Grading
Proposed New Residence
1556 E. Ocean Boulevard
Balboa Island, Newport Beach, CA
V01-7- 3130
1556Ocean blvd
Job No. 3204
Reference: Geotechnical Investigation Report, New Residence,1556 E. Ocean Boule-
vard, Balboa Island, Newport Beach, CA, by this firm, dated September
15, 2017, by this firm
Dear Mr. Haupert:
This letter presents the results of our observations and testing performed during the
grading for the new building pad at the subject address. Footing observations, pave-
ment subgrade, utility trench backfill, moisture conditioning, etc. should be tested and
approved when completed.
Shoring and Grading Observations
The following geotechnical observations were made during the course of grading:
1. Prior to overexcavation and recompaction of soils, temporary shoring was installed
along portions of the site to protect offsite properties. The limits of the shoring are
approximately shown on the attached Geotechnical Plan. The shoring consisted of
a system of steel pipes and wood lagging installed approximately as shown on the
plans prepared by the project structural engineer.
3204grad.doc
2. The existing soils within the upper 36 inches of the site was overexcavated,
blended with cement, moisture conditioned, and compacted in 6 inch lifts. The ce-
ment/soil ratio was approximately 4-5% by weight based on the number of Portland
Cement bags used per 6 inch layer of soil.
3. The materials exposed at the bottom of the overexcavation consisted of moist fine
sand. The exposed bottom soils were scarified, blended with cement and recom-
pacted to a depth of approximately 12 inches.
4. All fill was placed, compacted and tested in 4" to 6" lifts with 2 bags of Portland Ce-
ment per 1 cubic yard of onsite soils (approximately 4% by weight). The limits of
removals and recompaction extended to a distance of approximately 2 feet outside
the building lines.
5. The upper 12 inches of the building pad required imported soils to balance the pad
which consisted of crush gravelly sand imported to the site.
6. The building pad and garage pad are at near finished grade and were suitably com-
pacted per our recommendations. The building pad were left slightly low to accom-
modate future footing excavation cuttings. Footing excavation soils will be com-
pacted in the lower areas of the building pad and garage pad at a future date. The
finished pad grade shall be observed prior to placement of the slab underlayment.
Fill Placement and Compaction
In general, processing, moisture conditioning, and recompaction of the soil materials
were performed using a Rubber Track Loader compacter and a 1-1/2" inch water hose.
Fill was placed in approximately 4 to 6 inch horizontal lifts, with each lift compacted with
the grading equipment.
Fill Materials
The materials used for fill consisted of native fine sand which was test previously and is
non -expansive. The pad was capped with crushed coarse sand which was imported to
the site and is also considered non -expansive. Any soils used to make finished pad
grade (i.e. footing cuttings) shall be compacted prior to placement of the slab under-
layment materials. Based on our observations, our recommendations for foundation,
floor slab, and concrete type are still considered suitable and applicable.
Testing Procedures
In Place Density Tests
Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture
Expansion Index
Soluble Sulfates
ASTM D-2937
ASTM D-1557
UBC Test Method 18-2
ASTM D-516
The results of tests are presented on the attached "Table of Tests Results". The loca-
tion of tests are shown on the attached "Geotechnical Plan."
3204grad.doc
Closure
The results of our observations and density testing indicate that new cement -treated fill
used to construct the building pad was compacted to at least 90 percent relative com-
paction in accordance with our recommendations and the City of Newport Beach Grad-
ing Code.
The new building pad is now considered suitable for the support of the proposed struc-
ture. Other earthwork on this project remains to be tested and approved.
Respectfully submitted,
COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL
No, GE 229
Exp:6-30=1s
James R. Coleman, G.E.229
Exp. 6/30/2019
Attachments: 1. Table of Test Results
2. Geotechnical Plan
Cc; (1) Michael Terry, Graystone Builders, E -Copy
3204grad.doc
Lee Shoemaker, CEG 1961
Exp. 11/30/2018
§)
{41&
Ed
\9%
m00)
)/\
,���,��,�
§]
}(
`
2\
23
23
§}
(
\
\
\
(\
\
)
d
j (
k
�\/
\
m
/f{
®
a$)
§
>\+
ƒ
%
G
¥ \
_
,
¥�
2
. \
¥(
zFn
_
to
MW
\ �\
;
§
;
0\
c ��
,
,
,
-
);
m,{
.
aJ
!e
@
77
;
;
7c
kf
)c
5
(
)§
»
�
(J
k k
>
"6t'.t'Z.00=C1
IWIAI
ng
�
rz
07
10 Co
(0
Illy
U Lo
L J
m
L �—
10K
CN0(1)
Yj
w
I I
Haw
Z
X
I
I
x
�NJ ,13AO'
41
X
Pig
LEGEND
A&- Thin Manmade Fill over Beach Deposits COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL
GEOTECHNICAL PLAN
Oda
AMP AZ 0 e e I'Vef e- 7- / ovV JOB NO. I DATE I DR, BY
q. *,0yVf1ry 7ery-
A A Im � to
— — �-4 TEM 1VYZ.M Z 14 CA" ri 45
COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL
470 WALD
IRVINE, CA 92618
PHONE (949) 872-2582
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
Email; Lashoemaker@cs.com
July 31, 2019
Mark Haupert
2911 E La Palma Ave.
Anaheim, CA 92806
Attention: Mr. Mark Haupert
Subject: Final Geotechnical Report
New Residence
1556 E. Ocean Boulevard
Balboa Island, Newport Beach, CA
Job No. 3204
Reference: Geotechnical Investigation Report, New Residence, 1556 E. Ocean
Boulevard, Balboa Island, Newport Beach, CA, by this firm, dated June
24, 2018 by this firm
Dear Mr. Haupert:
This letter presents the results of our final observations and testing performed since the
completion of precise grading for the new home at the subject address.
Foundation Excavations
Prior to the placement of the new concrete floor, the foundation excavations were ob-
served by this firm. The excavations were found to probe firm and unyielding and suit-
able for support of the assumed designed bearing pressure.
Slab Underlayment System
Prior to placement of the concrete slab, underlayment materials were placed as speci-
fied in our Geotechnical Investigation Report and in accordance to the project plans.
3204Final.doc
These items include at 4 inch layer of open -graded gravel topped by filter fabric overlain
by a 15 MIL vapor barrier. Approximately two inches of sand was placed over the vapor
barrier and tamped prior to the placement of the concrete slab.
Front Entry Backfill and Subgrade
The front entry deck and patio required the placement of 1-2 feet of fill to achieve the
desired finished grade. The soils placed in this area after the house was completed
and consisted of Sand and Silty sand. These soils were tested and probed and found
to be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction.
Fill Materials
The materials used for fill consisted of native fine sand and silty sands which are non -
expansive.
Testing Procedures
In Place Density Tests
Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture
Expansion Index
Soluble Sulfates
ASTM D-2937
ASTM D-1557
UBC Test Method 18-2
ASTM D-516
The results of tests are presented on the attached "Table of Tests Results". The loca-
tion of tests are shown on the attached "Geotechnical Plan."
Closure
The results of our observations and density indicate that the earthwork described in the
proceeding paragraphs was performed accordance to our recommendations and is
suitable from a geotechnical standpoint... All backfill specifically observed and tested by
this firm was compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction in accordance with
our recommendations and the City of Newport Beach Grading Code.
3204Final.doc
The building site is now considered suitable for support of the new improvements.
Respectfully submitted,
COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL
%rJ dONryS'�
ok
078823
CIVIL
Jehu Johnson, P.E.
Exp. 9/30/2019
Attachments: 1. Table of Test Results
2. Geotechnical Plan
Cc; (1) Michael Terry, Graystone Builders, E -Copy
3204Final.doc
Lee Shoemaker, CEG 1961
Exp. 11/30/2020
[
2
§
\
A
LEGEND
AFThin Manmade Fill over Beach Deposits
C*Ar M
%AO
COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL
GEOTECHNICAL PLAN
JOB NO. I DATE I DR. BY
.00'98L'17=8
F
Nf
S-7-71. ...
7.7
Jh1C
C14 to
Z
Ii
1
0
LO
z
CN
0
to
LO
ZNO
LEGEND
AFThin Manmade Fill over Beach Deposits
C*Ar M
%AO
COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL
GEOTECHNICAL PLAN
JOB NO. I DATE I DR. BY