HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/26/1996 - Regular MeetingROLL
CALL
•
Present
•
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
PLACE: Council Chambers MINUTES
,J,
wtt¢Q
?Awwo
O
u7
W
}
m
w
m
u
w
>�
°¢
u
x
TIME: 7:00 P.M.
DATE: February 26, 1996
I
Closed Session - 5:00 p.m.
Closed Session [Refer fo separate agenda from City
Attorney]
Closed Session Report Presented (it applicable).
None.
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - 6:00 P.M.
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
ROLL CALL
1. Council Policy Review
(69 )
City Manager Murphy explained that the
supplemental staff report contains changes to
policies that were submitted for Council review on
February 12, 1996. He further explained that last
year the Council received a completely rewritten
policy book.
A -2 - Boards and Commission Appointments
Reference to "legislative body" changed to "City
Council' throughout the document for consistency
reasons.
A -4 - Community Service Recoanitfon Awards
Mr. Murphy explained that the last paragraph was
deleted in order to standardize the presentation of
awards. He also explained that staff is currently
drafting a policy dealing with employee service
recognition awards and will bring it back for
Council approval at a later date.
A -6 - Open Meeting Policies
Mr. Murphy explained the change to subsection 2
(c) (ii) to modify the agenda to include one area
for the Council to request that items be added to
a future agenda. The quotation in the subsection
was modified to parallel the language proposed in
subsection 5.
In reference to the items proposed to be removed
from the Consent Calendar (personnel vacancies,
denial of claims, rejection of claims, and
disposition of claims or settlements), Mr. Murphy
indicated that this information will be transmitted
to Council in a different form, perhaps through the
weekly newsletter.
Volume 50 - Page 63
NDEX
ROLL
CALL
•
•
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACII
J
�y
W
I
p
u,
M
MQU
MWwo
W
}
g2UL9X
N
W
W
>F-
°¢
February 26, 1996
A -10 - Procedural Rules for the Conduct of City
Council Meetings
Subsection 4.F. "Reconsideration" was modified to
clarify that motions for reconsideration are limited
to either the same meeting or the preceding
meeting only. In order to comply with the Brown
Act, a section will be added to the agenda
entitled, "Motions for Reconsideration."
D -1 - Press Relations
No comments.
F -1 - Statement of Investment Policy
Mr. Murphy indicated that the Local Agency
Investment Fund (LAIF) is still available.
F -2 - Reserves /Deslanations of Fund Balance
In addition to the proposed changes, the
terminology "unappropriated surplus" was
changed to "unappropriated funds."
F -18 - Publicly Owned Pay Telephones
Mr. Murphy explained that the additional change
is that the Utilities /Public Works Committee
approve the final location for all pay phones.
F -19 - Voice -Mail General Policy
Mr. Murphy stated that Mayor Hedges has
requested that staff also draft an e-mail policy that
is in compliance with the Brown Act and the Public
Records Act. Mayor Hedges suggested that the
modifications may be able to be made in the
open meeting policy.
Council Member Cox requested that staff draft
policies regarding the use of video or voice
conferencing when Council Members are absent.
G -1 - Retention or Removal of Park and Parkway
Trees
Mr. Murphy stated that the Parks, Beaches and
Recreation Commission approved the amendment
to the policy to remove the Standing Tree
Committee and delegate the authority to staff with
appeal to the Commission.
Volume 50 - Page 64
MINUTES
INDEX
Council
Policy
Review
ROLL
CALL
0
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
H
w
ZAwwo
I
Q
WA=uo3
}
¢
W
t7
W
>
°¢
Febniary 26, 1996
I
K -1 - General Plan
Council
Policy
The Council discussed the current noticing
Review
procedures and requirements and determined
that this is an area that should be addressed
during the comprehensive zoning ordinance
review and consideration given to adding it to the
municipal code and removing it from the policy
manual.
L -1 - Sidewalks. Curbs. and Gutters
No comments.
L -2 - Driveway Approaches
No comments.
L -4 - Private Streets
No comments.
L -5 - Street and Sidewalk Improvements
No comments.
L -6 - Private Encroachments in Public Riahts -of -Way
No comments.
L -10 - Sound Attenuation Walls
No comments.
L -12 - Oceanfront Encroachment Policy
The Council discussed using the local construction
index for the annual fee adjustments rather than
the consumer price index however no change
was made.
L -15 - Encroachments on Public Sidewalks
Public Works Director Webb clarified that the
sidewalk dining policy /ordinance to be considered
later does not change this policy.
Volume 50 - Page 65
NDEX
ROLL
CALL
•
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEAC H
MINUTES
H
W
?owwo
ownxuux
Q
}
Cr
w
U
w
>
°¢
r
February 26, 1996
NE
L -16 - Temporary Banners Extendina Over the
Council
Public Riaht -of -Way
Policy
Review
Mr. Webb indicated that it takes approval from
Caltrans to install a temporary banner in the
medians in Corona Del Mar. Mr. Murphy also
explained that banners notifying the general
public of a community -wide event are allowed
with certain provisions (i.e. open to the general
public without charge, conducted by a non - profit
corporation or organization, and co- sponsored by
the City of Newport Beach).
L -17 - Establishment of Curbside Bus Stop Zones
Deleted
No comments.
L -17 - Water Service Outside of the City (New)
No Comments.
L -19 - leased Street liahfs
No comments.
M -2 - Liahtina Systems on Private Streets (Deleted)
In response to concerns raised by the Council, Mr.
Murphy indicated that staff and the County are in
the process of developing a policy related to the
installation of telecommunication systems. Council
also discussed the possibility of setting standards for
installation of cable boxes and policies on electric
utility purchases.
L -20 - Wafer Rates
Concerns were raised about the changes to the
policy (elimination of 4 and 6). The policy
indicates that the City's water rates provide
sufficient revenue to offset various costs and the
proposed changes deletes items 4) the transfer of
$100,000 to the Future Water Sources Reserve; and
6) the transfer of $200,000 to the Water Quality
Improvement Reserve. City Manager Murphy
indicated that the proposed policy will provide
adequate reserves.
Volume 50 - Page 66
IEX
ROLL
CALL
Motion
All Ayes
Present
40
Motion
All Ayes
Motion
All Ayes
•
CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH
,J,
w�MQ
N
W
>
w
w
>�
February 26, 1996
Public Comments
Dolores Offing questioned what the cost is to
provide water for two months; voiced concern
about taking the word "Finance" out of the
department name that deals with finance;
questioned how the public would access the
information taken off the agenda related to
claims, personnel vacancies, etc.; asked if the
Council follows the policy that states that if they
are disqualified from voting on an item that they
leave their seats; and asked where the public can
pick up copies of the closed session agenda and
when the Council reports on actions taken in
closed session.
X
Mayor Pro Tem Debay moved to approve the
policies as discussed.
REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 P.M.
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
ROLL CALL
Mayor Pro Tern Debay recognized the Youth Council for
their part in planning the Student Government Day.
Mayor Pro Tern Debay also recognized three Public Works
employees, Vince Lockyer, Jim Delicce, and Jeff Sankey
for their actions during the February 22, 1996 sewage spill.
Public Works Director Webb gave a brief overview of the
circumstances surrounding the sewage spill, the actions
taken by the three workers, and explained that the spill
was not caused by the City of Newport Beach, but was a
result of a malfunctioning switching system of the Orange
County Sanitation District. Mayor Hedges commended
the crew on behalf of the entire Council.
X
Reading of Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 12,
1996, was waived and approved as written, and ordered
filed.
X
Reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions under
consideration was waived, and City Clerk was directed to
read by titles only.
MATTERS WHICH A COUNCIL MEMBER WOULD LIKE STAFF TO
REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING:
None.
Volume 50 - Page 67
MINUTES
INDEX
Council
Policy
Review
ROLL
CALL
Motion
All Ayes
•
CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACII
MINUTES
H
w
Z
I
�
Cl:
M
Wg2U(93
}
QQ
W
February
W
W
O
W
>r
J
Cl:
26, 7996
I
MATTERS WHICH A COUNCIL MEMBER MAY WISH TO PLACE
ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT:
• Mayor Hedges requested that discussion and action
be scheduled for March 11, 1996 regarding his State of
the City proposal.
• Council Member Glover requested that staff establish
a Code of Civility or Decorum for commissions and
committees to be brought back for Council approval.
She said that once the code is approved, if the
members of the commissions do not want to accept
them, they should resign so they can be replaced.
She said that civility is the tone that the Council wants
to set. City Manager Murphy indicated that staff
would bring this item back to Council in two weeks
and requested that Council Member Glover work with
the staff to develop the code.
CONSENT CALENDAR
X
The following Items were approved, except for those items
removed (2,4 and 8):
ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION
Schedule for public hearing on March 11, 1996:
2. Removed from the Consent Calendar.
3. Proposed ORDINANCE NO. 96 -7
Ord 96 -'
Zoning
AMENDING CHAPTER 20.76 OF THE NEWPORT
(94 )
BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW TIME-
SHARE PROJECTS IN COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS
[PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENT NO.
PCA 842
842].
RESOLUTIONS FOR ADOPTION
4. Removed from the Consent Calendar.
5. Resolution No. 96 -19 of intention to approve the
Central
CENTRAL BALBOA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
BID /Res
1996 -97 FISCAL YEAR ANNUAL REPORT at a public
(27/68)
hearina scheduled for March 11, 1996.
6. Resolution No. 96 -20 of concurrence declaring
PW
MESA DRIVE BETWEEN IRVINE AVENUE AND BIRCH
Res 96-
STREET TO BE A COUNTY HIGHWAY.
(74 )
CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS
7. RECYCLING CONTRACT (NO. 2807) FOR CR
CRTrans
TRANSFER (CRT), INC. - Approve subject contract
C -2807
for the processing of solid waste for recyclables.
(3 8 )
I
J
Volume 50 - Page 68
NDEX
Bal
96 -19
fer
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MTNTTTF.q
ROLL
CALL
~
Z
0
W
3p¢gQXOF~-
WA
-
w
=OU
W
d3
February 26, 1996
INDEX
8. Removed from the Consent Calendar.
9. CLAIMS - For Denial by the City Manager.
(3 6 )
Diane Donovan for damages sustained on August
15, 1995, alleging she was rear -ended by a City
employee that was negligently operating a motor
vehicle on the property located at San Joaquin
and Jamboree; seeking $14,500 for damages, out -
of- pocket expenses, medical special and general
expenses.
Bryan S. C. Fraser for damages sustained on
January 1, 1996, alleging that a palm tree on the
property located at the comer of 4th Street and E.
Balboa Boulevard broke off at the base, fell and
damaged his 1995 Ford Ranger, seeking $1,283.20,
the cost not covered by his automobile insurance.
James Parker Huston for damages sustained on
September 4, 1995, alleging that he sustained a
broken ankle while skateboarding, as the wheels of
his skateboard struck an irregular elevation
between the gutter and road surface on property
located at 1851 Port Seaborne Place; seeking the
•
following damages: $7,405.75 medical expenses to
date, estimated future medicals of $1,000 and
general damages for pain and suffering in the
amount of $25,000.
Eileen R. MacDonald for property damages
sustained on January 23, 1996 at 107 Highland
Street, alleging that a City truck hit and broke her
front yard fence; seeking reimbursement for repairs
of $443.
Sav -on Moving for damages sustained on February
3, 1996 alleging that the comer of his truck box was
damaged from a tree limb hanging over 1344
Sussex Street; seeking reimbursement of $7,526.71
for repairs and truck rental costs.
Nironjan and Bharati Shah for damages sustained
between the second and fourth weeks of
November 1995, alleging that heavy equipment
used by the Alba Construction Company caused
shaking which resulted in some items falling from
the shelves and walls and breaking on the
property located at 9225 Hays River Circle,
•
Fountain Valley; seeking reimbursement in the
amount of $177.
10. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA - February 22,
(68)
1996.
Volume 50 - Page 69
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL
CALL
~
Z
o
N
W
xmmX0V_
W
}
;
W
_
°
w
X
February 26, 1996
INDEX
11. REPORT ON POLICIES RELATING TO THE HUMANE
(68 )
•
RELOCATION OF ANIMALS DISPLACED BY NEW
DEVELOPMENT - Receive and file (informational
only).
12. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 96 -1 - Request to
GPA 96 -1
initiate various amendments to the Newport Beach
(45 )
General Plan, as follows:
A. Circulation Element - Master Plan of
Bikeways - To reflect changes which have
resulted from the construction of the San
Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor (SR73)
and the elimination of MacArthur
Boulevard /Avocado Avenue one -way
couplet.
B. Temple Bat Yahm - 1011 Camelback Street
- To increase the allowed development of
the temple site to allow for the adoption
and implementation of a facility master
plan. The project includes the acquisition
of additional land and the potential
increase of 40,000 sq. ft. to the existing
•
facility.
C. Cantanzarite /Summerhouse - To revise the
boundary between the Retail and Service
Commercial and Single Family Residential
boundaries which is required as a result of
the alteration of lot lines between the two
properties.
D. Zoning Code Re -write - Amendment of the
General Plan and Local Coastal Program,
Land Use Plan as necessary to allow for the
comprehensive re -write of the Zoning
Code.
E. General Plan Update - To amend the
General Plan Elements and the Local
Coastal Program, Land Use Plan as part of
the periodic review of the City General
Plan Program.
13. MARIAN BERGESON AQUATIC CENTER RENTAL FEE
C -2761
SCHEDULE - Approve fee schedule.
(38/62)
14. WITHDRAWAL OF USE PERMIT 3571 (2600 East Coast
U/P 3571
•
Highway APPLICATION FOR "BRICKS" RESTAURANT
(88)
(JOHN MCLAUGHLIN, APPLICANT) - Receive and
File.
Volume 50 - Page 70
ROLL
CALL
•
M*
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
J
r...�
W
I
to
M
0�
It
MWWo
W
>-
Q
Q
'n
W
(9
T
°Q
U
W
>
U
r
X
February 26, 1996
15. GOALS FOR 1996 - Approve implement
for top Council goals.
16. BUDGET AMENDMENTS
BA -030, $7,748 - Appropriate u
donations from California State Library
for part-time salaries (LIBRARY
ADMINISTRATION).
BA -031, $30,000 - Appropriate from Te
Reserves for the improvement of tei
(COMMUNITY SERVICES).
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
2. Proposed ORDINANCE NO. 96 -6,
AMENDING CHAPTER 20.72 (RE:
OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNIC
TO ALLOW SPECIALTY FOOD SERVI
HAVE LIMITED ALCOHOLIC BEVEL
[PLANNING COMMISSION AMENI
839].
Council Member Watt questioned whc
something the City wants to go forward
time based on the letters that have bee
expressing concern for the number of lic
in the city. She also noted that BPPAC
that this item be rescheduled due
concerns, therefore she requested that
held until the questions raised by
parties can be addressed.
In response to Council Member GIOVE
Director Temple indicated that the
typical use permit is approximately $
further noted that staff issues permits fc
food service businesses, however th
Commission would have to approve c
including beer or wine service.
Dan Marcheano, President of the
Association, spoke in support of the
stating that the specialty food restc
looking for ways to bring the nei
residents into their establishments.
X
Mayor Pro Tem Debay moved to
Ordinance No. 96 -6 and set the public
March 11, 1996.
Volume 50 - Page 71
MINUTES
INDEX
ition plans (33 )
(40)
nexpected
o be used
SERVICES
Ennis Court
mis courts
TAURANTS)
IPAL CODE
CE USES TO
AGE SALES
)MENT NO.
other this is
with at this
n received
luor outlets
has asked
to similar
his item be
- oncemed
r, Planning
-ost for a
1400. She
or specialty
a Planning
pplications
Restaurant
proposal
urants are
)hborhood
introduce
hearing for
Ord 96 -6
Zoning
(94)
I PCA 839
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL
CALL
~
Z
o
1
3pMM
w
}
;
W
_
0
°
W
;
m
February 26, 1996
INDEX
n
x
After discussion about the appropriate time to
make amendments to the ordinance, Council
Member Glover moved to amend the motion to
include a provision to the ordinance which would
allow live entertainment limited to no more than
three (3) individuals performing without amplified
sound.
In response to Council Member Watt, Ms. Temple
indicated that a business would be classified as a
"bar" if it derives more than 30% of its total gross
annual revenues from the sale of alcoholic
beverages.
All Ayes
The amendment to the motion carried unanimously.
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
x
The main motion carried with Council Member Wait
Noes
x
voting no.
4. Proposed Resolution No. 96.18 supporting renewal
Offshore oil
of the OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING MORATORIUM AND
Drilling
FEDERAL LEGISLATION TO PROVIDE LONG TERM
Res 96 -18
PROTECTION FROM OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING; and
(87 )
authorizing a financial contribution of $2,000 to the
•
OCS Coalition.
City Manager Murphy reported that there are five
other cities that have indicated their support of the
moratorium.
Motion
x
Council Member Edwards moved to adopt
kll Ayes
Resolution No. 96 -18 supporting renewal of the
moratorium and to authorize a financial
contribution of $2,000 to the OCS Coalition.
8. EL PASEO STORM DRAIN PROJECT (CONTRACT NO.
El Paseo Stn
3047) - Approve the plans and specifications, and
Drn Prj
authorize the City Clerk to advertise for bids for the
C -3047
construction of the project.
(3 8 )
City Clerk Harkless reported that on February 26,
1996 letters were received from Jack Benson,
Construction Resources and Consulting; and the
law firm of Valentino, Ives & Keating representing
the Bahia Corinthian Yacht Club, voicing concerns
about the project.
Based on these letters, City Manager Murphy
requested that this item be continued to March 11,
•
1996 to allow staff time to meet with the
concerned parties.
lotion
x
Council Member O'Neil moved to continue this
X11 Ayes
Rem to March 11, 1996.
Volume 50 - Page 72
CITY OF NEW]PoRT BEACH
ROLL
CALL
W
W
ZAWW°
o
Cr
Cr
Wca
M
¢
w
�'
w
-J
~
¢
February 26, 1996
INDEX
PUBLIC HEARINGS
17. Continued public hearing regarding MORGAN
GPA 95-3(E)
DEVELOPMENT, 507 -519 ORANGE AVENUE, GENERAL
(45 )
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 95 -3(E), RESUBDIVISION NO.
1021, SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 75, AND
MODIFICATION TO THE ZONING CODE.
City Clerk Harkless reported that on February 26,
1996 two letters were received from Jerry Tucker,
and Ann Peters, Ted Jarvis and Suzanne Shuler, in
support of the proposed project.
Planning Director Temple gave a brief overview of
the proposed project pointing out that the original
request was for an increase in the permitted
density of development from four units to eight
units; a limitation in the permitted floor area of 1.37
times the Buildable Area of the site; and a 1 foot 10
inch encroachment into the required 6 foot 10 inch
side yard setback on 15th Street. She explained
that this hearing was continued from January 22.
1996, at the request of the applicant, and the
applicant has subsequently eliminated one of the
•
units bringing the proposed project to seven units.
She pointed out that all other aspects of the
project are the same and it is the first application
for multi - family residential (MFR) in West Newport.
She also explained that on December 7, 1995 the
Planning Commission considered the project with
eight units as originally proposed and approved
the request.
Mayor Hedges opened the public hearing.
APPLICANT
Tod Schooler, Architect, 500 N. Newport Boulevard,
gave a brief overview of the steps they have been
through to process their application. He indicated
that they have solved all the issues dealing with: 1)
uniqueness of the lot; 2) does the project fit the
character of the neighborhood (compatibility); 3)
is there enough land (density): 4) the bulk of the
building; and 5) parking and traffic. Mr. Schooler
pointed out that the project includes the addition
of curb and gutter, a new alley, handicapped
•
parking spaces and 29 parking spaces for seven
Volume 50 - Page 73
}
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL
CALL
,-�
Z
I
Cfl
W
3
WgMU3
}
m
w
m
U
w
0o
-
February 26, 1996
INDEX
units. He said the project is more in line with single
GPA 95-3(E)
•
family housing and they want to maintain the
characteristic of the neighborhood by only
building 1 and 2 story structures. He further noted
that since the project is designed with a lower floor
area ratio they have been able to include more
landscaping, private yards, grassy areas, and a
meandering sidewalk.
OPPONENTS
Stacy Wise, 3233 Broad Street, reported that the
neighbors are still concerned about the increase in
population and would prefer to see the number of
units reduced to six, although they appreciate the
reduction in the number of units. She also voiced
concerns with the loss of street trees, especially a
cedar tree, and asked if efforts could be made to
save the cedar tree.
Shari Rooks, 3308 Clay Street, referring to a petition
submitted earlier, requested that the Council keep
in mind the wording on that petition. She said she
is opposed to increasing the density, would prefer
the R -2 zoning, however might consider an extra
•
unit per lot for a total of six units.
Carl Carver, 3239 Broad Street, said that if the
density is increased beyond R -2 it will change the
character of the neighborhood and he is opposed
to that.
REBUTTAL
Tod Schooler, Architect, 500 N. Newport Boulevard,
explained that the property has been for sale for
six years and he believes it has not sold because of
the location of the lots. He said he would like to
save the cedar tree, however it may conflict with a
handicap ramp. He said that based on a
marketing study it was determined that in order to
make the project work financially they could not
reduce the number of units to less than seven. He
explained the difference in this project and others
proposed for Broad and Clay and said he does
not believe any precedent will be set because of
the unique nature of this lot.
•
In response to Council Member Glover, Public
Works Director Webb indicated that his staff will
work with Mr. Schooler to try to save the cedar
tree, however some compromises may have to be
made.
Hearing no further testimony, Mayor Hedges closed
the public hearing.
Volume 50 - Page 74
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
AdTI TTTTLVC
ROLL
CALL
Z
ownmuux
3pwm
}
w
W
February 26, 1996
INDEX
Council Member Glover reported that she will be
GPA 95 -3 (E)
•
supporting the proposed project because she
would not want to see businesses encroach further
into the residential area. She said she would
consider this to be a "rim" lot since it is between
commercial and residential areas and would thus
provide a buffer for the residential areas. She also
pointed out the negative aspects of this lot and
said she would be reticent to support MFR any
further into the neighborhood because of the
neighborhood attitude, however this property is
not based on a grid street pattern.
Motion
x
Council Member Glover moved to approve the
Planning Commission decision of approval, as
modified, on the following: 1) adopt Resolution No.
96 -21, General Plan Amendment No. 95 -3(E);
Res 96 -21
Resubdivlsion No. 1021: Site Plan Review No. 75
(modified as indicated below); modification to the
Zoning Code; and to introduce Ordinance No. 96 -8
Ord 96 -8
(Planning Commission Amendment No. 837)
amending Title 20 to rezone the property from the
"R -2" District (Two - Family Residential) to "MFR (7du)
11.37 x B.A.]" District (Multi - Family Residential).
•
Included In the motion are the following
modifications to Site Plan Review No. 75. Finding
No. 6 is revised to read as follows: "That the
development, as conditioned, is compatible with
the character of new and proposed residential
structures In the neighborhood and will contribute
to the orderly and harmonious development
surrounding properties in the City." Finding No. 12
should be added to read as follows: "The exterior of
all structures shall be a Cape Cod style (wood
siding or shingles combined with appropriate
window and roof treatment) or Mediterranean style
(stucco with appropriate architectural, window,
and roof treatment) consistent with new and
proposed residential structures in the
neighborhood." Also included in the motion is a
provision that the City will work with the architect,
Mr. Schooler, to try to retain the cedar tree as per
the wishes of the neighborhood. Following
discussion about the retention of the tree, Public
Works Director Webb indicated that he feels it can
be worked out so the tree can be saved. In
response to Mayor Pro Tern Debay, the project
architect, Mr. Schooler, indicated that the
additional findings and terms are acceptable.
•
Mayor Pro Tern Debay spoke in support of the
project based on the improvements to the area
and the fact that it is a transition lot between
commercial and residential.
Volume 50 - Page 75
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ILVIa ►N Ilii
ROLL
CALL
N
Z
O
�
3
W
}
pM=
g
W
i
0
U
W
U
Cr
February 26, 1996
INDEX
Council Member Waft spoke in opposition to the
•
project based on the added density, etc., and
stated that philosophically she doesn't feel a need
to go to MFR to provide a buffer.
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
x
The motion was voted on and carried.
Noes
x
ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION
18. Proposed ORDINANCE NO. 96 -5,
Ord 96 -5
'
Public Nudit,
AMENDING CHAPTERS 5.28, 5.97 AND 10.54
(27)
OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO PUBLIC NUDITY.
City Attorney Burnham gave a brief overview of
the ordinance.
Sarah Sansevieri, Corona Del Mar, thanked the
Council for their efforts to overturn total nudity in
the City. She voiced her concerns about the court
overturning previous ordinances and indicated
that on the first Tuesday in March a meeting is
.
planned amongst interested citizens to see what
they can do to show the owners of "Mermaids"
that their business is not welcome in this community
and if anyone is interested they can call their
Santa Ana office.
Motion
x
Council Member O'Neil moved to adopt
Ordinance No. 96 -5.
Mayor Pro Tern Debay stated that the U.S. Supreme
Court is saying that pornography is free speech,
therefore the changes need to take place at that
level. Council Member Glover pointed out that
the group referred to by Ms. Sansevieri is "Enough is
Enough," and they are located in Santa Ana.
k11 Ayes
The motion was voted on and carried.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
e Bonnie O'Neil voiced concerns about Measure S,
stating that the proponents are well organized and
funded, and she is not sure the opponents will be able
to keep up. She emphasized how much the residents
of Newport Beach stand to lose if Measure S is
successful and urged the residents to get involved.
She asked that interested parties call 224 -5504 to get
more information about getting involved. Council
Member Edwards thanked Ms. O'Neil and the others
involved and reported that there is a breakfast
meeting scheduled for Tuesday, February 27, 1996 at
the Hyatt Regency in Irvine.
Volume 50 - Page 76
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACI
M T 1*%Tf TT'117 c
ROLL
CALL
H
w
O
U7
W
a:
W
>
g
w
a:
2
0
0
W
(9
�
3
February 26, 1996
INDEX
• Tom Hyans reported that the Regional Water Quality
Control Board is scheduled to vote on March 8, 1996
about pumping its treated sewage into the Upper
Newport Bay. He encouraged residents to write to the
agency and voice their opposition to the proposal
(California Regional Water Quality Control Board, 3737
Main St., Suite 500, Riverside, California 92501 -3339,
and add: cc: Regional Board, and copies will be
distributed to the seven board members.)
e Dolores Otting stated that one Orange County city
took exception to Condition 11 -J of the joint
agreement with the County of Orange on the
bankruptcy and will save $260,000. She questioned
whether Newport Beach would have saved money
too by taking exception to 11 -J. She also addressed
concerns about the revenue of the Integrated Waste
Management Fund that was in the enterprise fund that
may not be returned. She also addressed problems
with not going out to an open bidding process on
landfills, the liability involved, and future clean -up
responsibilities.
• Council Member Watt stated that the Santa Ana
Regional Water Quality Board will be holding a
•
meeting regarding the Irvine Ranch Water District
(IRWD) project on March 8 at 9:30 a.m., in the Council
Chambers, although there is a possibility that the
meeting will be continued. She suggested that
anyone interested should call the Mayor's secretary
(644 -3002) for information about the meeting or the
IRWD project and she will call them back and answer
any questions the Mayor's secretary cannot answer.
• Mayor Hedges reported that his parents are visiting
from out-of -town and he had this comment for them,
"Mom and Dad, you are out of order."
CURRENT BUSINESS
19. SIDEWALK DINING POLICY.
Permits/
Sdwlk Dining
John Douglas, Principal Planner, gave a brief
(65/68)
overview of the proposed policy and the history
behind the proposal. He stated that if adopted
this would be the second phase of code
amendments related to outdoor dining. He
explained that the first phase was the Accessory
Outdoor Dining amendment which allows outdoor
dining on private property without requiring
additional parking or traffic studies. He said the
current proposal would allow the Public Works
Director to issue permits for outdoor dining on
Volume 50 - Page 77
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MTNTTTFfi
ROLL
CALL
Z
'WA=O
Cr 3
Cr
w
A
X
W
O
H
3
February 26, 1996
INDEX
public sidewalks subject to certain standards and
Sdwlk Dining
•
procedures. He said there are some areas where
sidewalk dining may not be appropriate due to
narrow sidewalks and /or heavy pedestrian traffic
and the ordinance and policy have been
prepared with the intent of striking a reasonable
balance between pedestrian access, public safety
and business enhancement. He reported that the
six issues dealing with the proposal are outlined in
the report.
Dan Marcheano, President of the Restaurant
Association, and Marcia Dossey, President of the
Newport Pier Association, spoke in support of the
proposal.
Motion
x
Mayor Pro Tern Debay moved to Introduce
Ord 96 -9
proposed Ordinance No. 96.9 to establish
procedures authorizing the Public Works Director to
issue permits for sidewalk dining subject to certain
standards and to schedule a public hearing for
March 11, 1996.
Mayor Hedges explained that there are two areas
that staff has asked for Council direction on: 1)
•
fees; and 2) seating area dimensions and
horizontal sidewalk clear space.
For straw voting purposes, Mayor Pro Tem Debay
moved to approve Option (a) for Procedures and
Fees: Application fee of $50, Transfer Fee of $25,
and Annual Use Fee of $350 (over 500 sq. ft.) or
$200 (500 sq. ft. or less). After discussing the pros
and cons of the annual use fee, the Council voted
(straw vote only) to approve Option (a) with
Council Members O'Neil and Glover and Mayor
Hedges casting dissenting votes and speaking in
support of eliminating the annual use fee. Since
no alternatives to staff's recommendations for
required seating area dimensions and horizontal
sidewalk clear space were offered, Mayor Pro Tern
Debay included in her motion the approval of
Option (a), a minimum horizontal clear space of 6
feet (or 8 feet in high pedestrian traffic areas), with
flexibility for exceptions approved by the Public
Works Director where public safety would not be
jeopardized. Council Member Edwards
questioned whether the fees could be changed at
the time of the public hearing and said that the
•
fees should not be part of the ordinance so that
there is some flexibility in that area. It was clarified
that the fees are not part of the ordinance and are
set by resolution.
Volume 50 - Page 78
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MT NTTrpvQ
ROLL
CALL
W
I
o
N
Q
AWw°
W
r
Q
M
W
0
U
W
>
-i¢
0X
F-
February 26, 1996
INDEX
yes
The motion was voted on and carried.
20. NEWPORT AND BALBOA PIERS USE AND
Newport /Bal
REGULATIONS.
Piers
(62)
City Manager Murphy reviewed the history of this
issue that led up to the Council's adoption of an
ordinance in January of 1995 permitting the City
Manager to close one or both of the piers to fishing
during certain hours, if necessary, to combat
problems related to trash, debris, litter, vandalism,
and sleeping. He also reported on the meetings
that were held to try to resolve the problems. He
said that after considering all the options, the
following are staff's recommendations:
1) Close the piers between the hours of
midnight to 5:00 a.m. to reduce the accumulation
of trash and debris and vandalism to the pier and
improvements.
2) Install time lapse video cameras on both
piers to assist the Police Department in the
apprehension of the violators.
•
3) City staff to work with both concessionaires
on the piers to assure their compliance with
maintenance requirements in their respective
agreements.
4) Step up enforcement of the regulations
related to littering and fishing on the piers by
incorporating additional part-time hours within the
Marine Division 1996 -97 budget.
5) Work with the business associations
adjoining the Newport and Balboa piers to assist
them with revitalizing their respective areas to
improve these areas and attract new visitors.
6) Return to the City Council, as necessary,
with the appropriate implementation steps.
In response to questions posed by Council, Mr.
Murphy explained that it would be a sizable
expenditure to construct a "cat- walk" on the pier
for fishing only, as well as it could be determined to
be discriminatory and may run afoul of certain
•
state entitlements. In regard to the video cameras,
he indicated that the tapes would not be
reviewed on a daily basis, however they would be
Volume 50 - Page 79
CITY OF NEWRDRT BEACH
M T NT TTF C
ROLL
CALL
Z
pWg2UU3
N
3pMM
}
W
0
W
February 26, 1996
INDEX
retained for a predetermined period of time and
Newport /Bal
•
could be reviewed if incidents are reported. He
Piers
said the Police feel the cameras would deter
vandals and provide them with means to follow -up
on repeat offenders. He said they are
recommending that four cameras be installed at a
cost of approximately $7000 each.
Council Member Edwards pointed out that BPPAC
has also indicated a need to clean up the area,
he feels there is a larger solution and this will only
be putting a band -aid on the problem. He said
that it isn't the local fishermen that are trashing the
area and something needs to be done so that
visitors don't feel comfortable trashing the area.
John Vinardi voiced concern about the expense
of the cameras and said he feels the fishermen will
only vandalize them. He reiterated that the local
fishermen are willing to help clean the pier. He
said closing the end of the pier. would be
unconstitutional and said he feels the lessee wants
to monopolize the end of the pier so that he can
install more tables.
•
Jo Hendriks, 2239 Catherine Place, Costa Mesa,
said that fishing is the heritage of this city and it is
being threatened by self- serving people. She
questioned why the lessee would want to install
more tables if his revenue is down. She presented
the Council with 45 letters requesting that the pier
be kept open. Mayor Hedges stressed that this
issue was brought about by Council's interest in
keeping the piers clean.
Marcia Dossey, President of the Newport Pier
Association, said she doesn't feel the
recommended actions will solve the problem, but
hopefully with the implementation of the business
improvement district a formula can be developed
to assist in this area. She said she feels the cameras
will be an incentive to deter or eliminate problems,
however the association has never encouraged
closing the pier entirely. She spoke in support of
the recommendation although stated she, too,
feels it is a band -aid treatment. In response to
questions posed by Council Member Edwards and
•
his statement that the problem is a larger one and
systematic of the area, Ms. Dossey said that she
does not have any suggestions of ways to solve the
problems and stressed the need for synergistic
attitudes between the users (fishermen, diners,
walkers, etc.). She also spoke in support of having
a police sub - station at the pier.
Volume 50 - Page 80
r
a
M4
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL
CALL
H
Z3mn
owmMuo3
N
of
>
W
W
0o
-
February 26, 1996
INDEX
Tom Hyans, President of Central Newport
Newport /Bal
•
Community Association, explained some of the
Piers
fishermen's antics that he has witnessed and said
he feels the lessee and his business have become
the whipping boy in this issue. Using a request for
the Community Association to pay half the cost for
installation of a fence ($1,000 ) as a comparison, he
urged the Council not to spend $28,000 for
cameras that will be vandalized.
Joe Embriano explained that the pier is used by
some people to catch food and private business
should not take precedence. He said he does not
know of a clear cut solution, however there are
some strong legal issues involved in denial of
public access to local coastal areas and he plans
to fight it.
Richard Buenger, Santa Ana, explained that a
volunteer patrol was formed and they have been
policing the piers for one year and they plan to
continue with their patrol. He said the problem is
that the concessionaires do not clean the pier as
required by their agreements. He said he feels the
solution is continued policing and patrol, issuing
tickets and making the concessionaires comply
with the maintenance requirements of their
agreements. He said he would support closing the
pier from midnight to 5:00 a.m.
Lou Fichoux said that the video cameras that were
recently installed in the police cars should be able
to be of some use to solve the problem. He spoke
in support of the City Manager's recommendation.
Mayor Hedges explained that the Council has
been clear that they want the current ordinances
enforced and questioned why the enforcement
has not been stepped up before. He also said he
feels the Police Department should do the
enforcement and not the Marine Department and
asked for information on citation history that was
requested a year ago.
ution
x
Mayor Hedges moved to approve staff
recommendations 3 through 6 (as noted above)
with the exception that the Police Department will
be the responsible department for increased and
•
strict enforcement. He commended Mr. Murphy
and staff for their work on this issue.
Volume 50 - Page 81
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
M T XTr TrP 10 c
ROLL
CALL
~
0
�
WM
>-
W
U0X
W
February 26, 1996
INDEX
on
x
Council Member Cox made a substitute motion to
approve the staff recommendations as presented.
Newport /Bal
Piers
Council Members Watt and Edwards voiced
Amended
concerns about Installing video cameras, therefore
x
Council Member Edwards amended the substitute
motion to delete recommendation 2 (installation of
video cameras).
In response to Mayor Pro Tern Deboy, Mr. Murphy
reported on the status of other piers in the area
indicating that most are closed at night. To
explain the rationale behind staff's
recommendations, Mr. Murphy stated that the
Police have to witness an infraction before they
can cite and they also felt it was better to have
the Police watching homes rather than the piers.
Mayor Hedges said he is not advocating stationing
officers on the pier, however the piers should be
included as a normal part of their patrol. He spoke
against the motion stating that he doesn't believe
that all other possibilities have been exhausted
and once the pier is closed it will be difficult to
open it again.
x
x
x
x
x
The motion as amended was voted on and carried.
N
x
x
Mr. Murphy reported that staff will proceed with the
development of an implementation procedure.
21. BALBOA PENINSULA PLANNING ADVISORY
BPPAC
COMMITTEE 15 POINT PLAN AND INITIATION OF
(24 )
PLANNING STUDIES (request of Mayor Hedges).
City Manager Murphy reported that the Council
established the BPPAC to undertake the review of
issues in terms of the peninsula areas. He said they
came up with a list of 15 suggested solutions, all of
which deal with the larger issue, however it will
take time and some further refined study before
implementation can begin. He said BPPAC put
together a scope of work which he will review with
Mr. Collins this week and on March 11th he will
return to Council with a funding proposal for the
first phase of the consulting planning studies to
begin the implementation of the various phases of
the plan. He said staff is looking for a general
•
reaction from the Council on the 15 point plan and
general direction in which to prepare the
implementation plan and budget amendment for
Council consideration on March 11.
Volume 50 - Page 82
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL
CALL
,J�
Zawwo0¢
o
�
W
}
ra
w
=
OU
w
-
3
Febnrary 26, 1996
INDEX
Council Member Glover addressed the parking
BPPAC
•
plan issue and said that if done properly it can
help the pier situation as well as traffic circulation,
however noted that $30.000 would not even begin
to touch these areas. She also noted that there
are other areas that will need funding and
questioned where the balance would be. She said
there are needs in the other districts as well. Mr.
Murphy indicated that staff will attempt to put
together sufficient funds in the new budget to
cover these areas. He also indicated that he feels
that even though the plan identifies the peninsula
area he feels it will provide benefits city -wide since
it will focus on revitalization of commercial areas
and could lead to redevelopment areas.
Mayor Hedges pointed out that the committee has
identified that the peninsula consumes an
inordinate amount of the budget, so they feel it is
important to get the peninsula producing so it
does not consume so much of the resources.
Council Member Cox agreed that some of the
points will have city -wide benefit, however stressed
the need to come to grips with some strategic
•
situations. He indicated that the City has looked at
the traffic circulation issue before and he feels
there is a need to look at tenant mix issues which
will provide city -wide benefits.
In response to Mayor Pro Tern Debay's questions
about the recommendations submitted by the
Economic Development Committee regarding
McFadden Square and the Cannery, Mr. Murphy
indicated that the area that will be reviewed first
will be the Lido civic area and McFadden Square.
Motion
x
Mayor Hedges made a motion to direct the City
Manager to meet with the chairman of the
committee to formulate a scope of work and
Implementation plan for Council consideration on
March 11, 1996. Council Member Glover
requested that Mayor Hedges also work with the
City Manager and the committee chairman based
on his experience with the peninsula.
•
Volume 50 - Page 83
C I TY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL
CALL
~
w
?sw'axo�
owq
�
Q
`�``jWO
}
¢
W
U
=vas
W
>
-'¢
February 26,1996
INDEX
Al I Ayes
The motion was voted on and carried.
BPPAC
Meeting adjourned at 10:10 P.M.
The agenda for this meeting was posted on
February 21, 1996 at 3:00 p.m., on the City Hall
Bulletin Board located outside of the City of
Newport Beach Administration Building.
—\I &�)
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
�IK
�diei .r
v
Volume. 50 - Page 84