HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/24/2005 - Regular MeetingCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
May 24, 2005 - 7:00 p.m.
STUDY SESSION -- 3:30 p.m.
INDEX
CLOSED SESSION -- None.
A. RECESSED AND RECONVENED AT 7:00 P.M. FOR REGULAR MEETING
B. ROLL CALL
Present: Heffernan, Rosansky, Ridgeway, Daigle. Nichols, Mayor Bromberg
Absent: Webb (excused)
C. CLOSED SESSION REPORT - None.
D. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Council Member Daigle.
E. INVOCATION - None.
F. PRESENTATIONS
Athletic Complex at Estancia High School - Gordon Bowley, Costa Mesa
United, reported that they are dedicated to raising the $9.4 million needed to
construct an aquatic center at Costa Mesa High School and a multi -use stadium at
Estancia High School that would benefit the entire school district. Costa Mesa
Council ,Member Foley announced that Costa Mesa has pledged $1 million
towards the building of the facilities and $100,000 through Ikea Funds from a
development agreement. Mayor Bromberg indicated that this issue is borderless.
Introduction of Students Traveling to Okazaki - Dan Hoffman, Newport
Beach Sister City Association and Newport - Balboa Rotary member, introduced
the chaperone, Timree Gold, and the student delegation (Kelly Clark, Leilani
Tanbara, Daniel Ward, and Edward Wiklund) who will be traveling to Okazaki.
Butterfly Initiative Proclamation - Mayor Bromberg presented a
proclamation to Jaimee Niles who created the Butterfly Initiative which promotes
innovative ways to develop capacity, capability, and creativity.
State Champion Girls Soccer Team Proclamation - Mayor Bromberg read
the proclamation and presented one to each of the AYSO 57 Gator Girls and their
coach, Frank Mueller.
Proclamations for Outstanding Community Financial Contribution --
Police Chief McDonell reported that Kv Nam donated $50,000 towards the Police
Department Lobby Remodel and Police Museum, and Al Cordero contributed all
the architectural funding for the project. Mayor Bromberg read the proclamation
and presented them to Mr. Nam and Mr. Cordero.
Volume 57 - Page 249
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
INDEX
Youth Council Presentation - Max Ukropina, Corona del \lar High School
student. introduced the other Youth Council members in attendance: Ahlia
Kattan, Hanna Dean, Sheina Levine, and Brittany Levine. He utilized a
PowerPoint presentation to highlight what Youth Council does.
Chuck Jones Day Proclamation - Mayor Bromberg presented Chuck Jones
grandson, Craig Kausen, with a proclamation proclaiming June 4, 2005 as "Chuck
Jones Day ". Mr. Kausen announced that there will be a celebration at Fashion
Island on June 4.
Library Foundation Check Presentation - Newport Beach Public Library
Foundation President Edwards presented Library Board of Trustees Chairman
Hamilton with a $167,000 check. Trustee Hamilton explained what the money
will be used for and reported that the Foundation and the Friends of the Library
have given over $500,000 this year.
G. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
H. CITY COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS OR MATTERS WHICH COUNCIL
MEMBERS WOULD LIKE PLACED ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
DISCUSSION, ACTION OR REPORT (NON- DISCUSSION ITEM:
• Mayor Bromberg announced that Governor Schwarzenegger has
appointed him to the Orange County Superior Court bench and reported
that State law does not allow him to serve on the Newport Beach City
Council at the same time. He read his letter of resignation and stated that
his resignation will be effective June 17, 2005.
• Mayor Bromberg announced that the 12th Annual Balboa Island Parade
will be held on June 5 at 11 a.m. He stated that this years theme is
"Salute to the Troops ".
• Mayor Bromberg announced that the 1/1 Marines will be returning home
from Iraq on June 5. He noted that they are the oldest and most
decorated Marine unit in United States history.
• Mayor Bromberg reported that he spoke to an assembly of 650 young
adults at Ensign Middle School during their Character Awards and then
attended Newport Harbor High School's "Every 15 Minutes" program with
Council Members Ridgeway and Rosansky.
• Council Member Rosansky requested a status report at the next meeting
regarding the underground utility projects.
I. CONSENT CALENDAR
Council Member Daigle announced that the 2004 -2005 Traffic Signal Upgrades
project (Item 8) will modernize the traffic control signals. She reported that this
project will renovate signals on San Joaquin Hills Road and San Miguel Road and
at San Joaquin Hills Road and Marguerite. She stated that emergency
preemptive systems will be installed at Newport Boulevard and Balboa Boulevard
and at San Joaquin Hills Road and Newport Coast Drive. She reported that,
through the Capital Improvement Program and using a grant from the Orange
County Transportation Authority (OCTA), the City will look at upgrading the
Volume 57 - Page 250
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24. 2005 INDEX
signal controllers and adding a traffic operation center.
READING OF MIN UTES /ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
1. MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR AND REGULAR
:MEETING OF MAY 10, 2005. Waive reading of subject- minutes,
approve as written and order filed.
2. READING OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. Waive reading
in full of all ordinances and resolutions under consideratiom and direct
City Clerk to read by title onlc.
ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION
3. Removed at the request of Council Member Nichols.
ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION
4. ORDINANCE TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO PERS
C -563
CONTRACT TO PROVIDE PRE - RETIREMENT OPTIONAL
(38 /100 -2005)
SETTLEMENT DEATH BENEFIT TO SAFETY EMPLOYEES.
Continue to June 14. 2005.
RESOLUTIONS FOR ADOPTION
5. RESOLUTION RELATING TO CODE ENFORCEMENT IN WEST
C -3173
SANTA ANA HEIGHTS. 1) Adopt Resolution No. 2005 -28 authorizing
(38/100 -2005)
the City's Code and Water Quality Enforcement staff to serve the West
Santa Ana Heights community for a series of 1 -year renewable terms or
until such time as the City annexes West Santa Ana Heights: whichever
comes first; and 2) authorize the City Manager to execute a final contract
in substantially similar form to the draft Agreement attached to the staff
report as Attachment B.
G. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF
(100 -2005)
SEASHORE DRIVE. NEWPORT BOULEVARD AND BALBOA
BOULEVARD, AND SELECTED FEEDER STREETS FOR THE
JULY 4TH HOLIDAY. Adopt Resolution No. 2005 -29.
CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS
7, MESA DRIVE WIDENING PROJECT - APPROVAL. . OF
C- 3518(A)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CIVIL WORKS
(38/100 -2005)
ENGINEERS. 1) Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Civil
Works Engineers of Costa Mesa for design of widening Mesa Drive at the
intersection of Irvine Avenue at a contract price of 864;. 734 and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Agreement; and 2) authorize a
budget amendment (05BA -062) in the amount of $36,054 from the
unappropriated balance of the Circulation & Transportation Fund to
Account No. 7261- C5200665.
S. 2004 -2005 TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES - AWARD OF
C -3764
CONTRACT (C- 3764). 1) Approve the plans and specifications; 2? award
(38/100 -2005)
the contract (C -3764) to Inspection Engineering Construction for the total
Volume 57 - Page 251
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
bid price of $330,280 and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to
execute the contract, 3) establish an amount of $33,000 to cover the cost of
unforeseen work; and 4) approve a budget amendment (05BA -061) in the
amount of 5201.968 from the unappropriated balance of the
Transportation and Circulation Fund. 260 -3605, to Account No. 7261-
05200068.
9. Removed at the request of Council Member Rosansky.
10. Removed at the request of Council Member Nichols.
MISCELLANEOUS ACTIONS
11. 2005 -06 PROPOSED BUDGET HEARING; 2005 -06
APPROPRIATION LIMIT HEARING. Schedule a public hearing of the
City's Proposed Budget and Appropriation Limit for the 2005 -06 fiscal
year on June 14, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. and direct the City Clerk to publish a
notice of said hearings.
12. PASSIVE PARK IN THE SANTA ANA HEIGHTS
REDEVELOPMENT AREA. Approve the concept plan for the passive
view park at the intersection of Mesa Drive and Birch Street in Santa Ana
Heights: and direct staff to proceed with the preparation of plans and
specifications and solicit bids for park construction.
13. BUDGET AMENDMENT TO ACCEPT A CIIECK FROM THE
NEWPORT BEACH LIBRARY FOUNDATION AND APPROPRIATE
FUNDS FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS BUDGET FOR
FY 2004/05. Approve a budget amendment (05BA -064) to increase
revenue estimates by $166,708 in Account No. 4010 -5893 (NBPL
Foundation Donations) and increase expenditure estimates by the same
amount in Division 4090, Foundation.
520. LEGAL PUBLICATIONS FOR ONE -FEAR CONTRACT COVERING
FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2005 TO JUNE 30, 2006. Authorize the City
Clerk to publish a notice advertising for bids to be received on or before
the hour of 4:00 p.m., on Friday, June 10, 2005 for a one -year contract
covering the publishing and printing of legal notices, or other material
required to be published and circulated in the City of Newport Beach.
Motion by Council Member Ridgewav to approve the Consent Calendar,
except for those items removed (3, 9 and 10).
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Heffernan, Rosansky, Ridgeway, Daigle, Nichols, Mayor Bromberg
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Webb
J. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Allan Beek requested that Mayor Bromberg's replacement be decided by
election, not appointment. Mayor Bromberg noted that this item is on the
Volume 57 - Page 252
INDEX
(100 -2005)
(100 -2005)
(100 -2005)
(32/100 -2005)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
agenda as Itcm SU.
INDEX
Jim Hildreth presented and read portions of documents that are
supplemental to what was presented to Council at the last meeting
regarding moorings in the Grand Canal.
Paul Glowienke expressed hope that some of the $167,000 that was
presented today goes toward a potential refurbishment of the Corona del
Mar Branch Library.
Phillip Bettencourt, Newport Coast Community Association President,
stated that the Newport Coast residents are grateful for the recent hem's
commercial vehicle inspections on Newport Coast Drive and for the
increased presence of motor officers at Newport Coast Elementary School.
K. ORAL REPORTS FROM CITY COUNCIL ON COMMITTEE ACTIVITIES
Ad Hoc General Plan Update Committee (GPUC) — Assistant City Manager
Wood reported that GPUC and the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC)
have looked at the model analyses of the land use alternatives. She stated that.. at
the last meeting, GPUC looked more closely at areas where there are significant
traffic impacts and what types of land use changes might be causing them so they
can refine the land use alternatives. She reported that they also discussed the
program for the two public workshops which will be held on Saturday, June 25 at
the OASIS Senior Center from 9 a.m. to noon and from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
Local Coastal Program Certification Committee — Council Member
Ridgeway reported that staff has been communicating with Coastal Commission
staff to get clarity on what they want changed in the Land Use Plan. Assistant
City Manager Wood stated that both sides have agreed to reconsider some of the
requests.
Mariners Joint Use Library Ad Hoc Steering Conrinittee — Council Member
Ridgeway reported that the library is under construction and noted that the steel
structure has been erected.
City Council/Citizens Ad Hoc Committee for Marina Park Planning —
Mayor Bromberg stated that the committee has received a number of
presentations and believed that this will come back to Council in a few months.
He reported that the committee discussed whether to hire a consultant to do cost
analyses on the potential uses, but it was determined not to do that because it's up
to Council to hear the potential uses and have studies done if they choose. He
noted that the committee is charged with just bringing back alternatives. He
announced that the committee meets the third Tuesday at 4 p.m. in the Council
Chambers.
City Council Ad Hoc Marina Park Advisory Committee — Council Member
Ridgeway noted that the issue of the mobile home park was on the agenda at the
last meeting, but since that meeting lasted until 1 a.m., the item was continued to
the June 14 meeting.
Measure M — Mayor Bromberg noted that he appointed Council Member Daigle
to speak on behalf of the City regarding :Measure M which is the .05e tax for road
improvements. Council Member Daigle noted that Measure M has funded a large
Volume 57 - Page 253
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
INDEX
number of traffic and roadway improvements for the City.
Fourth of July Committee — Council Member Rosansky reported that the
annual meeting will be June 6 in the Fire Conference Room at 4 p.m.
Zoning Committee — Council Member Rosansky announced that the first
meeting will be held on June 2. He stated that they will be looking at zoning in
the City in an effort to simplify and streamline the process.
Newport Coast Advisory Committee — Council Member Heffernan reported
that they meet next on June 6 at the Newport Coast Elementary School. He
stated that they are working on the schematic plans and the potential conveyance
of land for the community center. He believed that they will also hear about the
school issue at Newport Coast Elementary School.
Toll Road Committee — Council Member Heffernan indicated that he attended
the meeting for Mayor Pro Tem Webb. He stated that the toll road agency will be
facing dire financial consequences in two years and will probably be raising the
toll fee in July.
Finance Committee — Council Member Heffernan stated that Council Members
Daigle and Rosansky serve on the committee with him. He indicated that, at this
week's meeting, they discussed two potential sewer and fresh water rate hikes and
talked about financing options for the Civic Center.
Telecommunications Committee — Council Member Heffernan stated that
Council Members Daigle and Nichols serve on the committee with him. He
reported that the City has 18 cell site applications pending or in process. He
indicated that they also discussed the cable franchise agreement and noted that
each cable subscriber contract is worth about $3,000.
L. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AND ORAL STATUS REPORT
14. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FOR MAY 19, 2005.
Senior Planner Alford reported that the Planning Commission considered
an Alcoholic Beverage Outlet (ABO) use permit for the Red Rock Chili
Company in Fashion Island and approved it.
Senior Planner Alford reported that the St. Andrew's Church expansion
project returned to the Planning Commission. He stated that the church
requested changes to the parking provision, specifically relative to the off -
site parking agreement with the school district. He reported that the
Commission voted 5 to 2 to recommend approval to Council. He indicated
that this will be brought before. Council soon.
Senior Planner Alford stated that the Commission received a presentation
from Applied Development Economics (_ADE) on the fiscal impacts of the
land use alternatives.
In response to Councifs questions regarding the St. Andrew's Church
project; Senior Planner Alford stated that the Commission relieved the
church of the condition related to the off -site parking agreement with the
school district. He indicated that this allows them to pursue onsite and
Volume 57 - Page 254
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
off-site parking options. He stated that there were a number of minor
revisions to the other conditions. He noted that the Commission expressed
their hope that the applicant and the neighborhood would get together
and reach a compromise. Mayor Bromberg believed that this will be
discussed at a special meeting. Senior Planner Alford indicated that, if
the applicant doesn't have an agreement with the school district; they will
most likely build a parking structure. Assistant City Manager Wood
confirmed that they are still required to have a certain number of parking
spaces but it's up to them on how they get it. She stated that there was
discussion about possibly having parking further off -site with a shuttle
service. She indicated that this wasn't included in the condition because
there was concern that, if it was less convenient for the congregation, they
would likely park in the neighborhood. Senior Planner Alford noted that
Council will receive a full report on the Commission's action and the
revised conditions.
M. CURRENT BUSINESS
15. EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR POLICE CHIEF BOB
MCDONELL.
City Manager Bludau staged that the recommendation is for Council to
approve an employment agreement for Police Chief McDonell who intends
to retire on July 1. He reported that Council Policy requires that any
request for an employee who retires and is considered for reemployment
within five years of retirement be approved by Council. He indicated that
the Chief intends to retire because of how PERS is set up. He noted that
the agreement is for the Chief to stay on for up to two years. He believed
that it is essential for the City to retain his services for as long as possible.
He reported that this is allowed under the PERS system and has been
done elsewhere in the State and County. He stated that the agreement
makes the Chiefs employment look much as it does now. He pointed out
that, if approved, this agreement would save the City about $26,000 in
retirement costs and medical benefits. He indicated that he cannot state
strongly enough how much confidence he has in the professionalism,
integrity, and management ability of Chief McDonell. He stated that this
is a high priority for him.
In response to Council questions, City Manager Bludau indicated that the
only difference between the terms of the agreement and his current
employment is that there will be a financial savings to the City. He stated
that, given the number of years he has worked, he is maxed out in the
PERS formula and his retirement will not increase. He explained that
Chief McDonell will be a retired employee in the PERS system, will be
receiving retirement and pay from the City, and the City will not need to
pay the PERS contribution anymore. He reported that the City will be
contributing some retirement money in an annuity, but it will still be
saving $26,000. He confirmed that Chief McDonell cannot draw any more
money from PERS because he's maxed out. He stated that it is like hiring
him as a private contractor, but in lieu of paying into the PERS system,
the City is going to be paying into his private annuity.
City Manager Bludau reported that Chief McDonell is allowed to work up
to six months per calendar year, but can work more than six months next
Volurne 57 - Page 255
INDEX
C- 2954(.A)
(38/100 -2005)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
year if Council adopts a resolution that is sent to PERS requesting an
exemption from the six month limitation. He stated that PERS grants
exemptions all the time.
Dolores Otting asked how much money will be going into the annuity and
how many other people will be taking advantage of this since not many
people get to retire with 100% of their salary. Noting that PERS does
these exemptions all the time, she suggested changing PERS so the City-
doesn't have to go through this. City Manager Bludau stated that the
state legislature, not the City, can change the PERS system. He reported
that the annuity will be about $45.000. He noted that he intends to be
very judicious before any recommendation relative to hiring back a City
employee goes to Council. Council Member Heffernan indicated that
Governor Schwarzenegger is trying to change the retirement system so
people pay into the plan rather than be guaranteed a benefit.
Motion by Council Member Ridgeway to approve the proposed
employment agreement, by which Chief McDonell would continue to serve
as the Newport Beach Police Chief after his official retirement.
Council Member Ridgeway stated that it is important for the Chief to
continue the continuity at the Police Department. Further, Chief
McDonell has a number of intra - agency programs he's involved with that
he would like to complete. He indicated that there is no heir - apparent at
this time, but one will probably surface during this two year period so
there is a smooth transition. He reported that Chief McDonell has saved
the City millions of dollars in claims against the City and has brought
back integrity and a high level of service to the Police Department.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Heffernan, Rosansky, Ridgeway, Daigle, Mayor Bromberg
':does: None
Abstain: Nichols
Absent: Webb
16. ADOPT RESOLUTION REGARDING INTERIM FUNDING
REIMBURSEMENT AUTHORIZATION FOR PROSPECTIVE CITY
HALL COMPLEX AND RESCIND RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -41.
Administrative Services Director Danner reported that Council adopted a
resolution the last time Council was considering rebuilding City Hall that
allowed for the reimbursement of any. expenses incurred prior to the
financing recommendation being adopted. He stated that the best guess
for the rebuilding cost at that time was $35 million. He reported that,
since the project includes a fire station and parking structure, they are
recommending that Resolution No. 2003 -41 be rescinded and Council
adopt a resolution that has a $50 million maximum amount. He stated
that they are not saying that the project will cost $50 million or that they
will request reimbursement, but it leaves the options open.
Council Member Rosansky noted that Roger Torriero of Griffin Structures
said that the total cost would be $41.5 million and asked how they came
up with $50 million. Administrative Services Director Danner reported
Volume 57 - Page 256
11011W4
(100 -2005)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
INDEX
that there are costs involved with issuing a Certificate of Participation
(COP). Further, since the City won't have use of the facility while it's
being built. there will probably be debt outstanding and the City will be
paying capitalized interest and the principal on the COP for a year prior to
occupancy. He indicated that on any bond issue, regardless if it is a COP
or general obligation lease revenue bond, there's a reserve requirement
which is normally equal to the annual debt service. He reported that this
monev is held in reserve for the bond or certificate holders and is used to
make the last debt service payment. He indicated that the financial
consultant estimates that the components mentioned would range from
$45,150,000 to $50,000,000. He added that the $50 million also includes
an increase in interest rates between now and when the certificates are
sold.
Council Member Heffernan reported that, at the Finance Committee
meeting, he was told by the financial consultant that the rate today for a
30 year bond would be about 4.7% if the City was rated, which equates to
about $3 million a year in debt service. He asked if the City has
considered future capital expenditures unrelated to City Hall.
Administrative Services Director Danner stated that a facilities needs
study is one of the top ten priorities for the City. He reported that there is
a $2 million reserve for capital improvements which is designed to meet
some of the needs of the facilities. He indicated that they are proposing to
increase the reserve from $2 million to $10 million in the proposed budget
to be adopted in June. He explained that this can be done because the
City has not had to use the PERS reserve of $9 million and will be
proposing a transfer of $4 million from the PERS reserve into the capital
improvement reserve. He added that additional moneys will also come
from the current budget. He confirmed for Council Member Heffernan
that the City has looked at its capital expenditures on a five and ten year
plan, looked at the reserves, and determined that the City has the money
to do those things. Further, it's premature to increase this $50 million
debt amount to also fund the other projects because they're either already
funded or it doesn't make sense to borrow money now to do something so
far in the future and pay the interest in between.
Council Member Nichols asked if City property has to be dedicated as
backing for the COP. Administrative Services Director Danner indicated
that this is an option, but the City is not choosing to do that. He reported
that this is simply a lease /purchase agreement for the facility itself and is
the reason for the capitalized interest. Ile stated that they cannot lease a
facility that is not built, so they are proposing to include the interest and
principal in the COP for the year that it's under construction. He noted
that the facility they're proposing to lease back is the City Hall facility and
nothing else.
City Manager Bludau reported that the City has an AA rating, but it was
discussed at the Finance Committee meeting to have the City obtain
insurance to have an AAA rating. He stated that, whether the City
pledged properties or not, the COP would be rated AAA. Council Member
Heffernan stated that the people who buy the COPS don't see a difference
between pledging the COP for the City Hall or towards the credit of the
entire City as long as the COP is rated and insured. Administrative
Services Director Danner reported that they can bring the City's
Volume 57 -Page 257
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
INDE%
underlying debt rating from AA to AAA by buying insurance. He stated
that the insurance will be less expensive for Newport Beach than other
cities that have an A or BBB rating because of its name and good financial
standing. He reported that Santa Monica is the only city in the State that
he is aware of with an AAA rating. City- Manager Bludau indicated that
the City's AA rating puts it in the top 15% to 20 %. He assured everyone
that no one will be paying more property tax than what they would be
paying without the project. He stated that this would be paid out of
revenues that would normally come into the City. Council Member
Heffernan explained that a bond, which is a voter issue_ is a line item
listed on your property tax bill and a COP is a cost item to the City.
Dolores Otting asked when the plan of what needs fixing will be available.
She noted that the City's rating is AA -. She expressed concern that $50
million is being discussed which will actually cost about $3.7 million a
year. She stated that the City has other indebtedness it pays, which
means the City will be paying close to $8 million a year. She hoped that
the City would get an appraisal of the current property and consider a
third option which relocates City Hall. She asked if the schematics that
will be available in September will be complete. She believed that we
don't need a new City Hall, especially at this location. She reported that
the city hall in Hesperia for $26 million included a library, redevelopment,
and commercial. Council Member Ridgeway noted that the City Hall
component is $21.5 million and the City's project includes a parking
structure and fire station. Mayor Bromberg reported that the City Hall
Building Committee dealt with the relocation issue twice, brought it back
to Council twice. and finances were not looked at because Council was not
interested in relocating City Hall.
Paul Glowienke asked how an additional $50 million of indebtedness will
impact the City's future credit rating and what levels of efficiencies will
occur that allow it to service the debt over 30 years. Mayor Bromberg
indicated that his second question is answered in the needs assessment
report. City Manager Bludau stated that, if the City makes its payment of
$3 million a year, it will probably enhance the City's credit rating because
it has had so little debt over the past few years and will gain experience.
Jim Hildreth questioned having a new Council Chambers and a
community meeting room, unless it was for earthquake purposes. He
stated that he has not seen anything regarding keeping documents.
Motion by Council Member Ridgeway to adopt Resolution No. 2005 -30
and rescinded Resolution No. 2003 -41.
Council Member Nichols asked if this should be considered tonight,
believing that Council needs to discuss how the fire station is oriented,
talk about issues regarding high rises, and determine whether this is the
right location. City Manager Bludau reported that this makes no
commitment on whether to move forward. He clarified that this gives
Council a reimbursement option through the sale of COPs for any
expenses incurred for the project. He stated that the City may not want to
do this, but this just gives the City an option.
Volume 57 - Page 258
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
Council Member Heffernan noted that he voted against the project and the
relocation, but explained that the reason the City is doing this is to have
the bond documentation in place to capture the low interest rates. He
emphasized that a 1% difference in rates is a huge amount on $50 million
and believed that this is a small cost to lock in that rate. He indicated
that this is a prudent thing to do since the rates are very low right now.
He agreed that this doesn't commit the City to anything.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote
Ayes: Heffernan, Rosansky, Ridgeway, Daigle, Nichols, Mayor
Bromberg
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: IA'ebb
1101118.1
17, REFORESTATION REQUEST HARBOR VIEW HILLS SOUTH (100 -2005)
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION.
Acting General Services Director Pisani reviewed the staff report and
reported that the Harbor View Hills South Homeowners Association's
submission met all the requirements of the G -1 Policy. He stated that the
policy allows legally established associations to apply for reforestation if
they delineate specific tree locations, the board of directors notifies
association members and gives them an opportunity to comment on the
request before they vote on the request, the association pays all the
removal and replanting costs, and they replant designated street trees on
a one- for -one basis with the minimum size being 24- inches. He indicated
that the Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission (PB &R) heard this
issue on May 3 and the motion failed by a 3 to 3 vote. He stated that some
of the Commissioners felt that the association wasn't doing its job
enforcing its Covenants. Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) since many
private trees were taller than the City trees they were asking to be
reforested.
Mayor Bromberg indicated that he is unsure why PB &R voted against this
since this request is consistent with the G -1 policy. Council Member
Nichols stated that this request has gone through all the needed steps,
meets the G -1 policy requirements, only deals with 19 trees, and the trees
block ocean views. He believed that denying this request tells the
community that they cannot make their own decisions. He indicated that
Urban Forester Conway believed that this should be approved. He added
that the residents have a procedure to handle private trees within the
association.
In response to Council Member Ridgeway's questions, Acting General
Services Director Pisani indicated that the trees will be removed by the
tree contractor and will not be saved since they will not be replanted or
resold. He believed that the cost to containerize or clam shell the trees
would exceed any value the City would get from them. Council Member
Ridgeway asked him to research this, but stated that he is supportive of
the recommendation. City Manager Bludau noted that the homeowners
association pays for any cost involved in cutting down or saving the trees.
Volume 57 - Page 259
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
INDEX
Yvonne Houssels, President of the Harbor View Hills South Homeowners
Association, distributed photos and requested that Council approve the
reforestation request since they've complied with all the G -1 policy
requirements, as they did for the three previous stages. She noted that
they are a view community and the trees to be reforested are impacting
views. She indicated that they were surprised when three Commissioners
took issue with how they enforce their governing documents and explained
that their board attempts to maintain as many trees as possible and does
not require trimming or removal of private trees unless they receive a
complaint and the tree is investigated by the Tree View Chairperson. She
reported that the use of 24 -inch box trees is permitted under the G -.1
policy, especially in the view communities, and noted that the previous
stages were approved with 24 -inch box trees. She indicated that staff and
the association agree that 36 -inch box trees are too large for the parkway
and will most likely cause compacted roots and unhealthy trees. She
stated that the wrong trees were planted in the parkway and had to be
topped and trimmed extensively. She pointed out that no one from the
association is contesting the reforestation.
Debra Allen, Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commissioner, distributed a
letter from her neighbor and from the Cameo Community Association, and
stated that a number of her neighbors, including the President of the
Harbor View Hills Community Association, are present to support Harbor
View South's application. She stated that it would exponentially increase
the cost to view communities to clam shell trees. She reported that, since
the contractor will remove the trees for $200 per tree, the associations can
conduct large scale reforestations and replant with the designated street
tree. She reviewed the process for the associations and expressed the
opinion that the City has no business allowing their trees to violate and
void the associations' CC &Rs.
Tim Brown, Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commissioner, expressed
concern that, if this request is denied, the City is not being consistent in
its application of public policy. He noted that the other Commissioners did
not demonstrate that this request was different than the previous three
requests. He expressed his concern for the life of the trees being removed.
He stated that prior to discussing this issue, PB &R had an emotional issue
and believed that some of that emotion carried over to this issue and had
some influence on the vote.
Tom Moulson stated that he lives in Harbor View Hills North and
expressed his support for the request because view protection is
important.
Brian Corrigan stated that he moved to his neighborhood because of the
views. He noted that a lot of effort went into the G -1 policy and his
association works very hard to comply with it. He stated that some of the
trees cannot be trimmed down without looking like a nub. He noted that
the trees are only trimmed every three years, but his trees will grow and
block the view to the ocean within six months. He requested that Council
remove the trees since he spoke to his neighbors, they are fine with the
request, and he is paying for the reforestation. He believed that the PB &R
Commissioners should've contacted him about his trees rather than just
make a drive through the neighborhood.
Volume 57 - Page 260
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
INDEX
Barry Allen stated that he is the Civic Affairs Officer for Harbor View
Hills Communitv Association and reported that their association also has
language in their CC &Rs regarding view preservation. He indicated that.,
if there is a complaint about a private tree, there is a process for
investigating the situation. lie emphasized that no one wants their view
hindered by City trees. IIe expressed his association's support of staffs
recommendation since the Harbor View Hills South Homeowners
Association met all the G -1 policy requirements, will fund the entire cost
for the reforestation, and the PB &R Commissioners who voted against the
reforestation are not present to explain or support their position.
Lloyd .Krause reported that the current trees are pruned by the City
during its cycle but, within a few months. the trees grow back to the same
height as before. He discussed photos that showed how quickly the trees
grew and believed that the solution is reforestation.
Bud Volberding, Harbor Views Hills Community Association President,
expressed the association's support of the recommendation and read the
letter from the Chairman of the Cameo Reforestation Committee.
Allan Beek stated that he. agrees will all the speakers.
Harbor N %iew South resident stated that it's hard to explain the dynamics
of view sight lines, adding that the sight line may appear different when
driving down the street versus seeing the actual view. Be believed that it
would be expensive to save the current trees due to their size, the location
of the sidewalks and curbs, and the thickness and length of the roots.
Further, it may be impossible to safely harvest the trees. He stated that
the G -1 policy is a good policy that should be allowed to work.
Council Member Ridgeway stated that the subcommittee worked on the
current G -1 policy for months and the subcommittee, PB &R Commission,
and the City Council voted unanimously to approve it. He agreed that the
trees cannot be harvested. He reported that he called the Commissioners
who voted against this and was not given a clear reason why they voted
the way they did. He questioned why 24 -inch box trees were
recommended when 36 -inch box trees would fit in the parkways and asked
who pays for the reforestation. Commissioner Allen reported that the
applicant can only be the homeowners association; but how the association
raises the money to pay the City is up to them. She explained that they
didn't require 36 -inch box trees in the view communities because it costs
about $1,000 per tree to take out the new tree and put in a 36 -inch box
tree versus $200 per tree for a 24 -inch box tree. Further, 36 -inch box trees
don't do as well in the five -foot parkways. Council Member Ridgeway
stated that he has planted hundreds of trees in his developments and that
he is not persuaded by the economic argument.
Motion by Council Member Nichols to approve the reforestation
request.
Council Member Daigle stated that each tree has had so much pruning
that they resemble a telephone pole more than a tree. She expressed her
hope that what the City will be planting in its place will .look good in ten
years and won't grow to the heights that will need extensive pruning.
Volume 57 - Page 261
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
Council 'Member Ridgeway stated that he asked the Commissioners to tell
him where the G -1 policy says they could vote how they did, lie reported
that they couldn't find a section.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote
Ayes: Heffernan, Rosansky, Ridgeway, Daigle, Nichols, Mayor
Bromberg
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Webb
18. INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A
TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT AND
OPERATION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES.
City Attorney Clausen reported that the voters adopted the
Compassionate Use Act of 1996 which relieved certain qualified
individuals and primary caregivers from State criminal sanctions for using
marijuana for medical purposes when the qualified individuals were
seriously ill and a medical professional determined that the use of
marijuana could help their medical condition. She stated that, since 1996,
there have been a few cases published regarding whether someone who
was arrested for growing or selling marijuana would qualify as a primary
caregiver or qualified individual. She reported that, in the last month, the
City has received three inquiries about opening a medical marijuana
dispensary or medical marijuana co -op. She stated that, after their
investigation, they had questions about whether the concept of medical
marijuana dispensaries or medical marijuana co -ops was envisioned by
this Act and whether it was legal. She reported that the other issue which
is before the Supreme Court is the decision whether Federal law regarding
the sale and use of marijuana preempts State law. She noted that this
decision hasn't occurred vet.
City Attorney Clausen indicated that they are recommending that Council
adopt the moratorium to give the City Attorney, Planning, and Police
Departments time to look at these types of facilities and determine how
they might qualify as a primary caregiver, and to make sure the City
generates appropriate regulations and identifications for locations and
operations if it is determined that the City needs to regulate them.
City Attorney Clausen reported that the urgency ordinance requires a 4/5
vote, more information will be brought back to Council in about 45 days,
and then Council may decide to extend the moratorium for an additional
10 months and 15 days which would make it a year. She explained that
they may need that much time since there are quite a few legal issues that
need to be resolved. Further, they need to determine what the impacts
are in order to come up with additional regulations. She explained that
the State rules are specific relative to relief of criminal sanctions for
primary caregivers and qualified individual; however, State law is not
clear that a person can open a dispensary to sell it. She stated that they
will need to find out how they operate, how they operate to qualify as a
primary caregiver, and then determine the appropriate regulations so
there are no land use problems. She noted that these facilities are so new
Volume 57 - Page 262
INDEX
(100 -2005)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
and the City has only received inquiries, so she is not sure what they
would look like.
City Attorney Clausen confirmed for Mayor Bromberg that, if someone
opened a facility tomorrow and the Supreme Court determined that it
wasn't allowed, the facility would close down by operation of law. She
explained that they are doing this because there is no authority in the
zoning code today for this type of business to open up as a use. Further,
there is no identification in State law that authorizes operation. She
indicated that it's her opinion and recommendation that they do this,
otherwise the City has no regulations and someone can open one of these
businesses, start selling marijuana, and the City will be forced to issue
some type of business license. She expressed the opinion that the State
law is not clearly defined to allow the sale of medical marijuana as a retail
use. She emphasized that the only thing the City is proposing to prohibit
is the City issuing any type of entitlement or business license to open a
marijuana dispensary at this time.
Jim Hildreth stated that the voters approved this and the State and City
have had plenty of time to figure out what was going on. He indicated
that the City already has places that can dispense medication, called drug
stores, and he doesn't see what the complaint is. He stated that the people
who use marijuana are in pain and use it for medical reasons, and people
need to have compassion like the law says.
Motion by Council Member Ridgeway to adopt Urgency Ordinance
No. 2005 -7 placing a temporary forty -five (45) day moratorium on the
establishment and operation of medical marijuana dispensaries.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Heffernan, Rosansky, Ridgeway, Daigle, Nichols, Mayor
Bromberg
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Webb
'.Mayor Bromberg recessed the meeting at 9:50 p.m. and reconvened the
meeting at 10:05 p.m. with all members of Council present.
INDEX
19. TRIP GENERATION AND FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF THE (100 -2005)
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE LAND USE ALTERNATIVES.
Woodie Tescher, EIP Associates. stated that Council changed, modified,
and made additions to the land use alternatives. He indicated that, as a
result of this process, they have been assessing the implications of the
alternatives relative to traffic impacts, environmental impacts, and fiscal
impacts. He referenced Table 20 in the staff report and stated that it lists
the options used in the cumulative Citywide analysis.
Doug Svensson, Applied Development Economics (_ADE), utilized a
PowerPoint presentation and reported that tonight's analysis does not
account for inflation. reflects the annual operating costs and revenues: and
does not address the capital improvements that may be required to
Volume 57 - Page 263
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
INDEX
support the developments. He noted that a fiscal analysis is not a market
analysis. He displayed a graph of the relative impacts of various land use
categories and highlighted the impacts of visitors to the community. He
noted that they're only looking at one aspect of this tonight; however, all
the land uses have economic relationships within the City that contribute
to the fiscal outcome. He stated that the don't want to discard certain
land uses on this basis, but want to build a land use mix that contributes
to an overall balance.
Mr. Svensson reported that, as the trip generation increases, the fiscal
benefit also increases due to development. He added that it is also a
function of the land use mix within each alternative. He displayed slides
of the alternatives by major subarea. Regarding the "true minimums ", he
noted that the Newport Center area has the greatest potential for fiscal
benefit, while the West Newport Industrial area counterbalances that with
a negative that relates to the expansion of the hospital which is a non-
profit organization and doesn't pay property tax. He reported that this
alternative includes the option ofleaving Banning Ranch as open space,
but noted that the cost of purchasing the land and maintaining it would be
substantial and is not included in these charts because the cost is
uncertain and may even be an infrastructure cost. For "subareas only
minimums ", he pointed out that the airport area plays a stronger role in
generating revenue. Be reported that the "maximum" alternative has a
strong contribution from the airport area and Newport Center area.
Mr. Svensson displayed slides of the individual areas and reviewed the
fiscal differences between the existing General Plan and the options. He
stated that, for the airport area, the General Plan option has zero impact
and the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) options focus on mixed
uses that add more commercial development and lodging. He indicated
that, in the Balboa Village area. the existing General Plan would have
multi - family residential development and the options have different
combinations of similar land uses or adds commercial or lodging to the
mix. For Banning Ranch, he reported that the existing General Plan
allows a substantial amount of development, but because of its location, a
lot of the development will be industrial and office uses that don't do well
from a fiscal standpoint. He indicated that the options also include open
space and a small resort. He stated that, in West Cannery Village, the
alternative adds mixed uses. He indicated that the options for East
Cannery Village adds commercial or multi -family residential. Regarding
Corona del Mar, he stated that the existing General Plan and the options
involve expanding the single family housing stock. He reported that, on
Lido Isle, the General Plan allows some of the existing units to be replaced
with two units. He indicated that, for Lido Village North and South, the
existing General Plan doesn't have a great deal of development potential,
but the options focus on lodging and commercial. Mr. Svensson reported
that the General Plan allows some incremental development of
commercial and lodging in Mariners Mile, and the options add mixed use
development and marine uses. He stated that, in McFadden Square, the
existing General Plan focuses on housing and the options add mixed uses
and lodging. Regarding Newport Center/Fashion Island, he indicated that
Option 1 focuses on increasing commercial and retail development and
adds a substantial amount of lodging. Be stated that Option 2 includes
more office space and Option 3 adds more retail, but neither of these have
Volume 57 - Page 264
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
the same impact as Option 1. He indicated that, in the 0 ld Newport
Boulevard area, the existing General Plan adds single family housing and
the options focus on additional medical offices and motel rooms. He noted
that the West Newport Highway area already has lodging but the options
look at replacing some of that with other development. He indicated that,
for the West Newport Industrial area, he took the hospital out of the mix
since it's a consistent element. He reported that the existing General Plan
and Option 1 focuses on additional industrial development, Option 2
focuses on additional office development: and Option 3 replaces those uses
with more housing.
In response to Council Member Nichols' questions, Mr. Svensson
confirmed that this analysis did not include traffic analysis. Assistant
City Manager Wood reported that traffic impacts will be discussed at the
next meeting.
Allan Beek asked if the fiscal benefit to the City and the fiscal benefit to
the land owners could be compared. He also asked that the different
relationships associated in the economic and fiscal relationships slide be
quantified. Mr. Svensson stated that there will be a higher interest in
developing the land uses if the market is strong and the demand is there.
He indicated that cities are faced with balancing between meeting market
demand and having non - residential economic development. He stated
that they do need to look more carefully at the amount of different land
uses that they can reasonably expect from the standpoint of what the
landowners, developers, etc. want to do. He reported that an economic
development strategy will be conducted to focus on what the City can do to
improve its job base and to deal with the economic relationships between
-residential and non- residential land uses to be sure this balance is
maintained over time.
INDEX
S21. PENDING RESIGNATION OF MAYOR BROMBERG FROM THE (33/100 -2005)
CITY COUNCIL AND THE OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE CITY
COUNCIL FOR FILLING THE VACANCY IN DISTRICT 5.
City Clerk Harkless reported that staffs recommendation is to have
Council declare District 5 to be vacant as of June 17, 2005, set the
deadline for receiving applications and establish an interview date. She
noted that, once Mayor Bromberg is sworn in as a judge, he can no longer
serve on the City Council. She read City Charter Section 403. She noted
that Mayor Bromberg's term does not expire until November 2008;
however, according to the Charter, the appointment will serve until
November 2006 and then the seat will be on the ballot for the remainder of
the two year term. She confirmed that the person can run for a full term
in 2008.
Council Member Heffernan believed that the Charter allows Council not to
appoint someone within the 30 day period and then, by default, an election
would have to be conducted. Ile asked how many times in the City's
history has Council made appointments. City Attorney Clausen indicated
that this has happened very few times. She stated that the Charter
requires Council to fill the vacancy by appointment; however, if Council
fails to fill the vacancy by appointment in 30 days, then an election is
supposed to be called. She noted that the Charter says "shall appoint" and
Volume 57 - Page 265
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
INDEX
does not give Council the authority to say they do not want to appoint.
Allan Beek believed that. since this is the Governor's fault, he should fix it
by having a special election at less expense to the City than if the City had
to call its own election. Mayor Bromberg noted that this would be
violating the City's Charter. Mr. Beek indicated that it wouldn't if there
happens to be a 3 -3 vote. He believed that it looks bad when almost half
the Council Members are appointed. Mayor Bromberg stated that there is
only one appointed Council Member seated. Council Member Rosansky
noted that he is an elected Council Member.
Dolores Otting stated that this will be the third appointment in 1' /2 years
and noted that this person could be on Council for 11' /1 years and probably
qualify for a pension. She believed that this doesn't look good and the City
needs an election.
Jim Hildreth agreed that we're a democracy and should have an election.
He noted that there could be a 3 to 3 split and believed that people should
prepare themselves for an election.
City Clerk Harkless indicated that, with the resignation being effective
June 17, the appointment needs to be made on or before July 17. She
reported that she can run the legal notices for two consecutive weeks
starting Saturday, May 28 and the deadline to turn in applications can be
after Saturday, June 4. She indicated that, at the next Council meeting,
Council can confirm the parameters for the interviews and set the
appointment date: however, there is nothing that prevents Council from
setting the interview date tonight. She read the parameters that were
established for the previous appointment and confirmed that Council can
appoint someone on June 28. Council Member Rosansky noted that this
had been done at a special meeting. Council Member Ridgeway reported
that there will be three Council Members gone from July 8 to July 20.
City Manager Bludau suggested making the appointment so there is a full
Council on June 28.
Motion by Mayor Bromberg to 1) declare the District 5 Council seat to
be vacant as of June 17, 2005; and 2) establish that the process leading to
the appointment of a successor as required by Section 403 of the City
Charter will be that a) the deadline to turn in applications will be Friday,
June 10 at 5:00 p.m., b) the interviews will be conducted in the Council
Chambers at a Special Meeting on Tuesday, June 21 at 6:00 p.m., c) the
interviews will be televised, d) about 25 minutes will be allotted to each
Council candidate for questioning which would include a two minute
opening statement and a five minute closing statement by the candidate,
e) the order of the interviews will be determined by drawing the names
from.a hat, f) the candidates will be sequestered and return to the
sequester area after the interview, g) if Council accepts the candidates.
Council will appoint by a majority vote of the City Council, swear in, and
seat the District 5 Council Member at that time.
Council Member Rosansky recommended that the opening statement be
five minutes and the closing statement be two minutes.
Volume 57 - Page 266
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
Mayor Bromberg amended his motion to change the opening
statement to five minutes and the closing statement to two minutes.
Regarding the appointment of a new Mayor, Citv Attorney Clauson
indicated that; according to the Charter, an election for Mayor would be
conducted at the time that the new Council Member is appointed. She
confirmed that the Mayor .Pro Tem is a separate position that's been
identified to act in the absence of the Mayor, but not identified as someone
who automatically takes over for the position since there is no succession
in the City. She stated that this will need to be an agendized item either
for June 21 or June 28. Mayor Bromberg believed that the Mayor Pro
Tem would preside over the meeting until Council elects a new Mayor.
Council Member Daigle asked if Mayor Bromberg can participate in the
Mayor election on June 14. City Attorney Clauson believed that he
couldn't because there is no vacancy and pointed out that the vacancy is in
the Council District, not the Mayor seat. She indicated that she has not
analyzed whether Mayor Bromberg could resign as Mayor and then
participate in the selection of a new Mayor prior to his official resignation
date. Mayor Bromberg requested that she look into this.
Without objection, Council Member Rosansky suggested that this be
brought back at the June 14 Council meeting so the City Attorney can
research some of these issues. He added that the Mayor should be elected
at the June 28 meeting.
Mayor Bromberg amended his motion to include direction for staff to
bring back a staff report at the June 14 Council meeting that outlines the
process for replacing the Mayor.
The amended motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Oyes: Heffernan, Rosansky; Ridgeway, Daigle: Nichols, Mayor
Bromberg
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Webb
Noting that it was after 11 p.m., Council Member Rosansky recommended
and received no objection to proceed with the Consent Calendar.
N. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
3. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING FINAL EIR, RESOLUTION
APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2004 -004, USE
PERMIT NO. 2004 -026, MODIFICATION PERMIT NO. 2005 -030
AND TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 2004 -003; AND ORDINANCE
r)LDOPTING PLANNED COMMUNITY TEXT AMENDMENT
NO. 2004 -003 FOR NEWPORT LEXUS AUTOMOBILE
DEALERSHIP (PA 2004 -153) - 3901, 3931, 3961 MACARTHUR
BOULEVARD AND 848 AND 888 DOVER STREET.
Council Member Ridgeway announced that he will be recusing himself on
this item and left the Council Chambers for the remainder of the meeting.
Volume 57 - Page 267
IVIODM
(100 -2005)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
INDEX
Council Member Nichols stated that there was discussion but no findings
that the traffic allowed in and out of MacArthur Boulevard was
appropriate or safe. He noted that the text was changed to allow a 55 foot
parking structure which is also the prominent structure viewed from the
street.
Casey Griffin, applicant, reported that the parking structure is 35 feet.
He noted that the element coming above the structure that makes it
55 feet houses the elevator shaft and is the same height as the tower
element at the corner shopping center. He added that it is 60 feet lower
than the building directly across the street. Council Member Nichols
asked Mr. Griffin if he could live with the 35 and 55 feet height
restrictions because he intends to ask that this be put into the zoning code
rather than have the ability at a later date to build the structure to 55 feet
with a 70 foot elevator shaft. City Attorney Clauson noted that these
issues have already been decided and approved by Council at the last
meeting. She stated that the documents were already approved by
motion, this is not a reconsideration of the item, and is just a request for
technical documentation to approve the resolution certifying the
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and introduce the ordinance that
adopts the PC Text. She clarified that. although the ordinance was
included, discussed, and approved at the last meeting, this is the time to
make changes to it, otherwise it would need to be reintroduced at the next
meeting.
Council Member Heffernan noted that commercial uses were not allowed
over the entire parcel. Contract Planner Lepo confirmed that this is to
change the use designation so Lexus can sell cars on the entire parcel
versus only part of the parcel.
Assistant City Manager Wood pointed out that one of the sites had no
height limit. Contract Planner Lepo stated that there is no height limit in
the General Plan for the three acres that is currently designated auto
center. He noted that the north portion of the parcel has an eight story
height limit which means that the project is significantly lower.
Contract Planner Lepo confirmed for Council Member Rosansky that
Lexus will need to come before the Planning Commission if they wanted to
add more floors to the parking structure. He assured everyone that they
do not have the right to add more floors, even though it's within the height
limitation.
Dolores Otting referenced page 25 of the staff report and asked if ingress
and egress is still allowed on MacArthur Boulevard. Council Member
Rosansky reported that the decision was to include a condition that the
building permit would not be issued until the ingress and egress was
reviewed by the Traffic Engineer. Assistant City Manager Wood noted
that this is Condition No. 28. Council Member Heffernan stated that he
spoke to the applicant, the Public Works Director, and the Traffic
Engineer and reported that he is convinced that this issue will be carefully
looked at before a building permit is issued.
Motion by Council Member Heffernan to 1) clarify the City Council
action of May 10, 2005, approving the Newport Lexus project, and
Volume 57 - Page 268
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
certification of the FIR, by adoption of Resolution No. 2005 -26 certifying
the Final EIR and Resolution No. 2005 -27, as amended, approving
General Plan Amendment No. 2004 -004. Use Permit No. 2004 -026.
Modification Permit No. 2005 -030, and Traffic Study No. 2004 -003: and 2)
clarify City Council action of May 10, 2005 approving Planned Community
Text Amendment No. 2004 -003 for the project by introduction of
Ordinance No. 2005 -8, read by title only and waive further reading, and
pass to second reading on June 14, 2005.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Heffernan, Rosansky, Daigle, Mayor Bromberg
Noes: Nichols
Abstain: None
Absent: Webb
INDEX
9. SUNSET RIDGE PARK: APPROVAL OF GROUND LEASE, C- 3743(A)
BUDGET AMENDMENT, AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS. (381100 -2005)
Assistant. City Manager Kiff utilized a PowerPoint presentation and
reported that, pursuant to Proposition 3, the California Constitution
allows land in the Coastal Zone to be transferred at its acquisition price.
He reported that SB124 was passed which allowed the City to buy the
land at $1.3 million. He explained that CalTrans would transfer the land
to the State Parks and Recreation Department and then the City would
lease it from them. He reported that the zoning is PC Text which allows
15 units per acre, but six acres must be a neighborhood or view park. He
displayed the timeline and confirmed that part of the bill included a
stipulation that the City had to develop a park on the site within five
years; so the City would've spent a lot more money than the acquisition
price.
Assistant City Manager Kiff reported that Council Member Rosansky was
aggressive in pushing staff to work with the State Parks and Recreation
Department on the ground lease in September 2004. He indicated that,
during that time. Senator Campbell introduced SB306 which would allow
the City to have a 25 -year lease rather than just a 10 -year lease.
However, at the same time, the State and Consumer Services Agency
instructed the Parks and Recreation Department staff to stop working on
the City's ground lease and transfer of jurisdiction documents, and
introduced AB54 to try to repeal SB124. He stated that Mayor Bromberg
sent a letter opposing AB54 and the City Manager sent a letter to the
Secretary of the State and Consumer Services Agency asking them to
expedite SB124. He reported that AB54 passed the State Assembly, but
still needs to pass the State Senate. He indicated that the City would
have performed everything it needed to in order to comply with SB124 if'
Council approves the ground lease and sets up the escrow account tonight.
He stated that the City will then go to the State, possibly with a letter
from the City Attorney, to request that they perform what they need to do.
Assistant City Manager Kiff emphasized that AB54 is not law and cannot
become. law until January 1, 2006. He stated that staff feels it would be
great to purchase Sunset Ridge Park directly rather than leasing it, but
the price is important. He reported that they are also working on
Volume 57 - Page 269
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
aggressively opposing AB54, unless it is amended to remove references to
Sunset Ridge Park. He stated that the Little League and AYSO will be
contacting the Governor. Further, the City continues to work with
Senator Campbell and Assemblyman Tran. He provided the public with
information on how to contact the Governor, Senator Campbell, and
Assemblvman Tran.
In response to Council Member Heffernan s questions, Assistant City
Manager Kiff reported that, when he and Council Member Rosansky were
in Sacramento last week, the State believed that the property was worth
between $10 million and 518 million. He emphasized that a deal is a deal
and, by law, the State is directed to transfer this land at $1.3 million. City
Attorney Clauson confirmed that the bill allowed the City to lease Sunset
Ridge Park from the State after the City paid the money. She pointed out
that the State Parks and Recreation Department has already agreed to
the lease.
Council Member Nichols received clarification from Assistant Citv
Manager Kiff that the recommendation does not approve an $18 million
price tag or open discussions for this amount.
Motion by Council Member Rosansky to 1) authorize the City
Manager or the Mayor to execute a Ground Lease with the California
Department of Parks and Recreation for the Sunset Ridge Park property
at Superior and Pacific Coast Highway in a form and substance
substantially similar to the Draft Ground Lease; 2) approve a budget
amendment (05BA -063) allocating $676,458 (in addition to the $680,000
already budgeted) to pay California State Parks to take title to the
property per the terms of Senate Bill 124 (Johnson 2001); 3) authorize the
City to open and administer an escrow account to cause the Sunset Ridge
Park property to transfer from Caltrans to State Parks according to the
provisions of SB 124; and 4) in the event that State officials offer a direct
sale of the Sunset Ridge Park property (including Director's Deeds
#040766 -01 -01 and #040766- 01 -02) to the City, authorize the City
Manager to negotiate with Caltrans on a direct sale.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Heffernan, Rosansky, Daigle, Nichols, Mayor Bromberg
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Webb, Ridgeway
INDEX
10. BACK BAY SCIENCE CENTER - AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO C- 3481(F)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH GAIL P. (38 /100 -2005)
PICKART.
In response to Council Member Nichols' concerns, Assistant City Manager
Kiff clarified that the Resource Agencies have tentatively agreed to leave
the Newport Aquatic Center (NAC) alone. He stated that they believe
they're on the right path in helping the NAC keep its beach. He pointed
out that the Resources Agencies that are dealing with the NAC have
nothing to do with the Back Bay Science Center.
Volume 57 - Page 270
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
Motion by Council Member Rosanskv to approve Amendment No 2 to
the Professional Services Agreement with Gail P. Pickart, P.E.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Heffernan, Rosansky, Daigle, Nichols, Mayor Bromberg
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Webb, Ridgeway
O. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - None.
P. ADJOURNMENT - 11:42 p.m.
The agenda for the Regular Meeting was posted on May 18, 2005, at 3:00 p.m on
the City Hall Bulletin Board located outside of the City of Newport Beach
Administration Building. The supplemental agenda for the Regular Meeting
was posted on May 20, 2005, at 2:30 p.m on the City Hall Bulletin Board located
outside of the City of Newport Beach Administration Building.
Recording Secretary
City Clerk
Volume 57 - Page 271
INDEX
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 24, 2005
INDEX
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Volume 57 - Page 272