HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/31/1006 - Adjourned Regular MeetingCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
City Council Minutes
Adjourned Regular Meeting
January 31, 2006 — 7:00 p.m.
A. ROLL CALL
Present: Council Member Selich, Council Member Rosansky, Mayor Pro Tom Webb, Council
Member Ridgeway, Council Member Daigle, Council Member Nichols
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Council Member Ridgeway
C. CONTINUED BUSINESS
1. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE - REVIEW OF DRAFT HOUSING, NOISE, AND
HARBOR AND BAY ELEMENTS; REVIEW MARINERS MILE CHAPTER OF
THE DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT. [681100 -20061
Woodie Tescher, EIP Associates, introduced the item and explained how the housing
element differs from most of the other elements in the General Plan. He provided
some additional background information and noted the Regional Housing Needs
Assessment (RHNA) allocation provided in Table 35 and the housing goals provided
in Table 36. In response to questions by Council Member Nichols, Mr. Tescher
explained that there are currently no significant penalties for failure to meet the
RHNA goals, but there are problems with not having a certified housing
element. Council Member Ridgeway and Mr. Teacher briefly discussed the
importance of having a certified housing element and the issue of meeting the
RHNA goals.
Council Member Daigle asked how SB626 (MELLO) would be applied to the City's
housing element. City Attorney Clauson explained that it's an analysis that's
conducted outside of the housing element, and Planning Director Temple clarified
that the reference of it in the housing element is to provide coastal residential
development standards.
Council Member Selich received clarification on the RHNA numbers presented in
the element and how they are developed. He questioned these numbers, and also
expressed his concern for using the theoretically high housing unit numbers for the
traffic model being prepared. Discussion followed regarding the complexity of the
issues, and what can be done locally and regionally. Council Member Ridgeway
stressed the importance of City representation at the Orange County Council of
Governments (OCCOG) and Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG) meetings.
Council Member Daigle received confirmation that the John Wayne Airport area
section of the housing element is consistent with the land use element.
In response to Council Member Nichols' question, Assistant City Manager Wood
explained that the affordable housing allocation percentages were calculated to
Volume 57 - Page 538
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
January 31, 2006
fairly distribute the financial burden to developers providing affordable housing.
Mr. Teacher briefly explained the discussions and changes made at the General Plan
Advisory Committee (GPAC) and the Planning Commission meetings to the goals
and policies, and Assistant City Manager Wood outlined the differences in the draft
from the City's existing housing element.
Council Member Ridgeway requested that in Policy 2.2.2, the language be changed
from "more than 20 %" to "not less than 20 % ".
Mr. Teacher introduced the noise element, briefly reviewed the information provided
in the handouts and outlined the changes to the goals and policies made by GPAC
and the Planning Commission.
Mayor Webb referred to the maps showing noise contours and disagreed with some
of the decibel information presented, noting that vehicle speed hasn't been taken
into consideration. He requested that the maps include a notation stating that the
contours do not reflect speed limits or topographical features.
Council Member Ridgeway requested that the language in Policy 2.5 be changed to
read, "enforce the noise standards for boating activities outlined in the Municipal
Code
Mayor Webb requested that in Policy 2.6, the language be changed from "yard areas"
to "rear yard areas ".
The general consensus of the Council Members was to add Policy 3.3, as
recommended by GPAC, and to also add the language to Policy 3.4, as also
recommended by GPAC. Mayor Webb requested that staff make every attempt to
make sure that the noise policies conform to the requirements of the Airport Land
Use Commission. Planning Director Temple stated that staff has also learned why
the City was considered an inconsistent agency by the Commission, and that it's
correctable.
The Council Members directed staff to reword Policy 4.6 to add a reference to noise.
Mr. Teacher introduced the Mariners Mile chapter of the land use element by
referring to the handout that outlined the changes recommended by GPAC. Both he
and Assistant City Manager Wood provided additional information on the
discussions and recommendations made by GPAC and the Planning Commission.
Carol McDermott, Government Solutions, discussed the revitalization of Mariners
Mile and introduced Eric Zuziak, JZMK Partners. Using a PowerPoint presentation,
Mr. Zuziak displayed an aerial photo and a proposed site plan for the Ardell
Property. Additionally, he displayed views of the public plaza and discussed various
features of the project and the plaza.
Council Member Ridgeway spoke in support of incorporating a pedestrian feel on the
site. Additionally, he advised the presenters to give public parking further
consideration. Mayor Pro Tern Rosansky questioned the need to include residential
in the project and spoke in opposition to residential at that location. Council
Member Daigle received clarification on how project quality could be assured.
Council Member Ridgeway provided reasons why a commercial -only project wouldn't
be advisable and spoke in support of including residential. Mayor Webb noted that
Volume 57 - Page 539
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
January 31, 2006
residential would be quieter and more compatible with the residential uses across
the bay than a commercial use of the site. He suggested a way to improve the view
corridor of the proposed project concept. Council Member Nichols expressed support
for the project.
Dan Daniels, Ardell Investment Company, provided some background information
on the property and expressed appreciation for the opportunity to present a concept
of what could be done on the site with a project that includes residential. He stated
that GPAC supported the project, as well as the policies in the General Plan that
would allow it.
Referring to the staff report, Council Member Selich asked if the general policy
guidance approach or the specific development regulation approach were supported
by GPAC and the Planning Commission for the Mariners Mile chapter of the land
use element. Mr. Teacher reported that GPAC voted 16 to 11 in favor of the
generalized approach. The Planning Commission voted unanimously in support of
it.
Mayor Webb suggested that "minimal use of...non-structural elements" instead of
"avoidance of...non-structural elements" be used for the fifth bullet of Policy 6.19.9,
referring to maintaining the views of the harbor. Nancy Gardner, GPAC Co- Chair,
expressed her support for Mayor Webb's suggestion.
Council Members Nichols, Ridgeway, Selich and Mayor Webb verbally voted in
support of residential on the waterfront in Mariners Mile. Mayor Pro Tem Rosansky
and Council Member Daigle voted in opposition.
Assistant City Manager Wood provided background information on the creation of
the harbor and bay element, and highlighted the changes made by GPAC, as
provided in the handout, and those made by the Planning Commission at their
meeting earlier in the day.
Council Member Ridgeway spoke in support of having a separate harbor and bay
element in the General Plan.
In response to Council Member Daigle's question, Assistant City Manager Kiff
expressed his concurrence with the recommendations, as written, and the
recommendation of the Planning Commission for the rewording of Policy 5.18.5. It
was the general consensus of the Council Members to support these
same recommendations.
Council Member Selich suggested that "and to restore eroded beach profiles" be
added to Policy 5.19.2 after "existing beach profiles ". It was the general consensus of
the Council Members to support the recommendation.
Mayor Webb suggested that "public walkways" be added to the list in Policy 5.19.3.
It was the consensus of the Council Members to support the recommendation.
S2. CONFIRMATION OF MAYORS APPOINTMENTS TO THE CITY HALL SITE
REVIEW COMMITTEE AND THE FACILITIES FINANCE REVIEW
COMMITTEE. [351100 -20061
Mayor Webb announced his appointment of Mayor Pro Tern Rosansky and Council
Members Selich and Ridgeway to the City Hall Site Review Committee, and Council
Volume 57 - Page 540
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
January 31, 2006
Members Daigle and Nichols and himself to the Facilities Finance Review
Committee.
Council Member Rosansky spoke in opposition to appointing three Council Members
to each of the committees, and stated that the committees were set up with only two
Council Members. City Attorney Clauson confirmed that staff would review the
resolution and the configuration of the committees, and return to the City Council if
it is determined that further action needs to be taken.
Motion by Council Member Ridgeway to confirm Mayor Webb's appointment of
Mayor Pro Tem Rosansky and Council Members Selich and Ridgeway to the City
Hall Site Review Committee; and the appointment of Council Members Daigle and
Nichols and Mayor Webb to the Facilities Finance Review Committee.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Selich, Council Member Rosansky, Mayor Pro Tem Webb,
Council Member Ridgeway, Council Member Daigle, Council Member Nichols
D. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
E. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - None
F. ADJOURNMENT - at 10:15 p.m.
The agenda for the Adjourned Regular Meeting was posted on January 25, 2006,
at 3:10 p.m. on the City Hall Bulletin Board located outside of the City of Newport
Beach Administration Building. The supplemental agenda for the Adjourned
Regular Meeting was posted on January 27, 2006, at 2:45 p.m. on the City Hall
Bulletin Board located outside of the City of Newport Beach Administration
Building.
El
City Clerk
�
Recording Secretary
Cz U)"
Mayor
Volume 57 - Page 541