HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/26/2006 - Study SessionCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
City Council Minutes
Study Session
September 26, 2006 — 4:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Council Member Curry, Council Member Selich, Mayor Webb, Council Member
Ridgeway, Council Member Daigle
Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Rosansky, Council Member Nichols
Mayor Pro Tem Rosansky and Council Member Nichols arrived later in the meeting.
1. CLARIFICATION OF ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
In regard to Item No. 3, Marine Charter Land Use and Parking Regulations, Council
Member Selich requested that staff look into a process where the Planning Department
would review the offsite parking agreements associated with marine charters, as is done for
the offsite parking agreements for other businesses in the City. Secondly, he requested that
the appeal process for such permits go through the Planning Commission instead of the
Harbor Commission.
In regard to Item No. 4, Group Residential Facilities and Large Family Day Care Homes,
Council Member Selich asked how extensive the group residential facilities problem is and
how the recommended changes would affect individuals wanting to rent a room in their own
home.
2. EVALUATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND PLAN CHECKING
PROCESSES, AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFFING. [100 -2006]
Assistant City Manager Wood stated that the process for development review and plan
checking involves the Planning, Building, Public Works, Fire, General Services and
Utilities departments. She reported that as the workload has increased in recent years,
some complaints have been received about timeliness and interdepartmental coordination.
She provided a brief history on what has been done in the past to improve the turnaround
time to four weeks, and stated that Hogle- Ireland, Inc. was also retained in January 2006 to
review the City's processes. She introduced Larry Hogle, a partner in the Hogle- Ireland
firm, and stated that his most significant recommendations are included in the staff report.
Mr. Hogle introduced Channery Lange from Hogle- Ireland and stated that she actively
participated in the report. Mr. Hogle stated that the recommendations and findings came
about with the cooperation and input of the development community, including architects,
developers, and permit and planning consultants. He stated that time was also spent with
the City's staff.
Council Member Nichols joined the meeting at 4:08 p.m.
Mr. Hogle stated that the staff report is comprehensive and noted that on page 35, a
Volume 57 — Page 790
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
September 26, 2006
summary of the findings and recommendations of the Hogle - Ireland report begin. He
specifically pointed out that one of the problems with the current process is the tremendous
space constraints in the Planning, Building and Public Works departments. In response to
Mayor Webb's question, Mr. Hogle stated that he isn't aware of any cities that
comprehensively allow developers to submit plans electronically, but that he does see this
happening in the future. In response to an additional question by Council Member Daigle,
Mr. Hogle stated that internal tracking programs are important and noted that the City is
currently using Permits Plus, which is primarily used by the Building and Public Works
departments.
Mayor Pro Tern Rosansky joined the meeting at 4:14 p.m.
In response to Council Member Curry's question, Mr. Hogle stated that the use of a Wi -Fi
system could streamline the process, if the City's permit tracking and monitoring systems
were improved. He explained that it would allow staff to access the system remotely,
and estimated that the average time savings would range from a couple of days to a couple of
weeks, depending upon the complexity of the application. In response to additional
questions, he stated that the Permits Plus system should either be modified or a new system
put in place that would work better for the Planning Department.
Mr. Hogle stated that another major finding of the report is that there is a general lack of
coordination between the three major departments, and that this is caused by the space
constraints, the lack of a good tracking system and the lack of an adequate number of staff
members, particularly in the Planning Department.
Mr. Hogle stated that a recommendation in the report that could have a significant impact
on the City is the establishment of the project manager concept. He stated that this
recommendation is covered on page 36 of the report, and would provide for consistency in the
responses from all of the reviewing departments. Council Member Ridgeway questioned
the ability of a project manager to determine possible conflicts among the recommendations
of the various departments. He suggested that another idea could be to reduce the number
of plans submitted and have just one or two plans placed in a central location for review by
all of the departments. Mr. Hogle stated that it is an alternative that could be worth looking
at. Assistant City Manager Wood stated that an advantage of the project manager concept is
that this person would see all of the comments and corrections at the end of the process, and
would be able to identify any conflicts in responses. She added that requiring only one set of
plans was a method that was used in the past and that it required more time in the review
process.
Council Member Daigle asked if corrections are available on line. Mr. Hogle stated that
some of them are. Mayor Webb stated that having corrections on line doesn't work well
unless the actual plans can be seen.
Council Member Curry asked Mr. Hogle to characterize the comments of development
community. Mr. Hogle stated that there were comments about using electronic processing,
but that this was not included in the report's recommendations because the ability to do this
does not currently exist. He confirmed for Mayor Webb that one of the problems is that
there is currently no standard software used for electronic submittals.
Mr. Hogle stated that another major finding of the report is the confusion created by the
City's 9/80 schedule. He stated that this is covered on page 37 and that the report
recommends that the City consider a more traditional 9/80 schedule, where City Hall would
be closed every other Friday. Mayor Webb noted that this would reduce the number of hours
that the public counters would be open, as would a 5/40 schedule. Council Member Daigle
Volume 57 - Page 791
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
September 26, 2006
noted that the 9 /80 schedule reduces car trips and that she would be in support of
considering the more traditional schedule, as recommended. Council Member Ridgeway
spoke in opposition to any 9/80 schedule due to the volume of work that needs to be
processed. Council Member Selich agreed with the comments of Council Member Ridgeway
and stated that it would not serve the public to close City Hall every other Friday. City
Manager Bludau stated that the current system is ineffective, because staff is off on both
Fridays and Mondays. Assistant City Manager Wood noted that the 9/80 schedule is a part
of the Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) with the employee associations. City
Manager Bludau stated that staff will include a recommendation on the 9/80 schedule when
it returns to the City Council on the matter in about a month.
Mr. Hogle stated that another finding of the report is that the Planning Department is
understaffed. The report recommends that three staff members be added to current
planning. He stated that another finding is that the City's zoning codes are complicated,
create inefficiencies and need to be updated. Council Member Daigle asked for Mr. Hogle's
opinion on using contract planning resources. Mr. Hogle stated that if it's structured right,
if the City has adequate review and control, and if qualified people are provided by the
consultant, it can work well. He stated that the advantage is that it can be scaled up or
down depending upon the work load. In response to Mayor Webb's question, Mr.
Hogle confirmed that it takes training to provide people that are familiar with the City's
codes. Assistant City Manager Wood stated that it seems to work better in Building than it
does in Planning. Council Member Selich stated that he's had negative experiences with
outside plan checkers.
Mr. Hogle highlighted another finding of the report and that is the importance
of department policy and procedure manuals. He stated that the Building Department has a
complete manual, but the report recommends that the Planning and Public Works
departments develop policy and procedure manuals, keep them up to date and make
them available to everyone in the department.
Council Member Ridgeway confirmed that Hogle- Ireland spent time in the Planning
Department as a part of their review, and asked if the work ethic and the culture of the
department was observed. Mr. Hogle stated it was observed, but that an efficiency analysis
was not done. He stated that everyone is working hard and conscientiously. The review
included technical matters and the coordination between the three departments, as well as
the internal operations of each. In response to Council Member Daigle's question, Mr. Hogle
stated that burnout among the staff members was not apparent on the surface. In response
to Council Member Ridgeway's question, Mr. Hogle stated that the interface between the
department heads and the staff members appeared to be adequate.
Council Member Selich stated he's seen three types of organizational structures, including
the City's current system, the use of a community development department and having an
assistant city manager oversee the three departments. Mr. Hogle stated that the last two
are very similar, but that having three department heads independently making decisions,
in general, does not work well. He stated that there should be some type of coordination.
Council Member Selich asked Mr. Hogle how the fire marshal factors into the
recommendations. Mr. Hogle stated that it requires a great deal of cooperation between the
Building and Fire departments because the interpretations of the fire code and the building
code can differ. He suggested that the Building Department have the final say.
Assistant City Manager Wood suggested that she, initially, take on the coordination role and
work with the three department directors, as well as the Utilities, General Services and Fire
departments, to begin implementing some of the recommendations contained in the Hogle-
Volume 57 - Page 792
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
September 26, 2006
Ireland report. In regard to staffing in the Planning Department, she noted that when the
four -week turnaround goal is missed, it's almost always because Planning has missed it.
She stated that building permit valuation has increased by 34% from 2000/2001 to
2005/2006, and the staffing level has not kept up with the increase. Assistant City Manager
Wood displayed several charts, as also included in the staff report, to illustrate the increase
in workload and the staffing level by function over the period from 1991 to 2005. She stated
that a recommendation on staffing would be included in the report to the City Council, as
mentioned earlier by the City Manager.
Council Member Curry complimented the analysis and moving forward with the
recommendations. He suggested that the objectives that come back to the City Council
include a reduction in processing time and a view towards service orientation. He suggested
that direct input be received from the development community in terms of how the system
can be improved.
Council Member Selich asked what the growth in applications and work load is attributed
to. Assistant City Manager Wood stated that some processes have been added to the zoning
code over time, development and site plan reviews have been added and, in general,
projects have become more complicated. She stated that this can partly be attributed
to redevelopment of older areas in the City.
Bill Ficker complimented the Hogle- Ireland report and, specifically, expressed support for
the project manager concept, a five -day work week and the consideration for utilizing
electronic plan submittals. He stated that he will provide the City with some information on
electronic submittals and stated that it will provide a great opportunity for streamlining the
process.
Council Member Selich expressed his support for establishing a community development
department that encompasses Building, Planning and Public Works. He stated that it
should be looked into and that at a minimum, there should be a line of authority in some
form over the three departments.
Council Member Ridgeway agreed that under the current system, there isn't effective
communication or coordination between the three department heads. He also expressed
support for increasing the staffing level in the Planning Department, and improving the
timeliness of the fire marshal's review. In regard to receiving input from the development
community, Council Member Ridgeway suggested that the focus be on the engineers and
architects.
In response to Council Member Nichols' question, Mayor Webb stated that the project
manager concept would be utilized for those projects that require significant review.
In regard to establishing a community development department, Mayor Webb noted that the
functions of the Public Works Department are much broader than plan checks and
development reviews. He stated that he could support a community development
department that includes the Building and Planning departments, and also expressed
support for a significant section of the Public Works Department to work on the coordination
needed for the development review process, but stated that he couldn't support the Public
Works Department being included in a community development department.
In response to Council Member Daigle's question, Assistant City Manager Wood confirmed
that outside contractors are currently being used to handle the backlog of work in the
Planning Department. Additionally, she confirmed that the four -week turnaround is for the
Volume 57 - Page 793
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
September 26, 2006
first review.
City Manager Bludau stated that staff will be looking at the many recommendations in the
report and noted that the solution will likely be a combination of several recommendations,
some of which will take some time.
3. BACK BAY LOOP TRAIL — CONCEPT AND PROPOSED ROUTE. [100 -2006]
Assistant City Manager Kiff displayed an aerial photo showing the Back Bay Loop Trail, as
also provided in the staff report. He stated that the trail is approximately eight miles in
length, and goes around the Upper Bay using existing roads and trails. He also displayed
the proposed signs, as were also provided in the staff report. The signs would be placed on
new and existing poles, with pavement markings used at locations where pole signs would
not be appropriate. In response to questions, he stated that the trail would be a leisure trail
used by walkers, runners and cyclists, and would provide an opportunity for families and
individuals to enjoy fitness and the back bay.
In response to questions raised about the outreach that has been done, Assistant City
Manager Kiff stated that he did meet with a representative from Dover Shores and with the
trails subcommittee of the Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission, and would be prepared
to do more outreach upon direction from the City Council.
Mike O'Connell, Executive Director of the Irvine Ranch Land Reserve Trust ( IRLRT), stated
that the IRLRT is offering to pay for the signs, and promote and maintain the trail. He
described the signs that are being proposed and agreed that there is the possibility that
"Newport Beach" could be used on all of the signs, even in those areas owned by the County.
In response to additional questions, Mr. O'Connell stated that special events on the trail
would be possible, if they were carefully managed and approved by the City. In closing, Mr.
O'Connell noted that the signs can be easily installed and a dedication planned once the City
is ready to proceed.
Assistant City Manager Kiff confirmed with the Council Members that they had no concerns
about the proposed route, and stated that he would begin a notification process.
4. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) - WIRELESS FIDELITY ("Wi -Fi') NETWORK
ACROSS NEWPORT BEACH (C- 3887). [381100 -2006]
Using a PowerPoint presentation, Assistant City Manager Kiff explained the reasons for
having Wi -Fi, also known as Wireless Fidelity, installed and how it works. He stated that a
proposed Request for Proposals (RFP) would be on the evening meeting's agenda for City
Council consideration. Additionally, he listed the concerns and issues that have been raised
since the proposed RFP and staff report were written, and explained the process that would
be followed after an approved RFP is issued.
City Attorney Clauson stated that the RFP could be approved at the evening meeting if the
City Council includes direction to staff on the amendments that will need to be made before
it is issued. Additionally, she stated that the City's existing system for issuing permits to
use City poles will also need to be considered as a part of the process.
David Mitchell, Pro 911 Systems, stated that Pro 911 Systems provides advanced
communication support to 26 agencies throughout California, and has built wireless mesh
networks in several locations, including Newport Harbor. He displayed live video of the
Newport Pier, which his company is contracted to deploy for the Newport Beach Lifeguards.
Mr. Mitchell stated that Pro 911 Systems would like to provide support and information
Volume 57 - Page 794
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
September 26, 2006
for the City's RFP process, and specifically suggested that the RFP include the option for the
City to develop and purchase some of the network, and also video web casting capabilities.
In response to Council Member Curry's question, Mr. Mitchell suggested that a sparse
network be built by the City that would include two to three wireless units per square mile,
requiring a capital investment of approximately $75,000 to $120,000. He stated that this
would be sufficient to handle network access by properly outfitted City vehicles. The
internet service providers could then expand the network to meet their needs at their
expense.
Mr. Mitchell displayed an actual wireless unit, and then showed a short clip that was aired
on Channel 2 News in October 2005 showing what was done for the lifeguards in Newport
Beach.
Chip Allsweet, Shubert Flint Public Affairs, stated that his company is working with
Earthlink and is looking forward to working with the City and providing the
needed networks. He stated that Earthlink typically installs 36 units per .square mile to
accommodate the needs of all residents and visitors to a city.
Charlie Smith, a partner in Seven Seas Systems, stated that he works with Mr. Mitchell. He
stated that the system being used for the lifeguards and in the harbor is proven and working
well, and that they are getting requests for additional cameras.
Council Member Curry stated that he's excited about the technology, that it
will allow residents and visitors to use their laptops anywhere in the City, and will also
assist City staff in doing their jobs. He stated that the RFP does need some work and that
he will suggest at the evening meeting that the matter be continued for two weeks.
PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
ADJOURNMENT - at 6:10 p.m.
The agenda for the Study Session was posted on September 20, 2006, at 3:10 p.m.
on the City Hall Bulletin Board located outside of the City of Newport Beach
Administration Building.
Mayor
�k' y
City Clerk
yg
■ \ u�fk {`
Volume 57 - Page 795