Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout21 - Superior Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot ProjectPORT CITY OF O � _ i NEWPORT BEACH City Council Staff Report <i FO RN November 19, 2019 Agenda Item No. 21 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: David A. Webb, Public Works Director - 949-644-3311, dawebb@newportbeachca.gov PREPARED BY: Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer, atran@newportbeachca.gov and Chelsea Crager, Associate Planner, ccrager@newportbeachca.gov PHONE: 949-644-3315 and 949-644-3227 TITLE: Superior Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project — Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approval of Conceptual Design, and Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Dokken Engineering (Contract No. 8020-5) ABSTRACT: As part of the current Capital Improvement Program, staff has completed the draft conceptual design and environmental documents for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot project. Upon approval and adoption of these documents, staff recommends proceeding with the final design and construction phases. RECOMMENDATION: a) Conduct a public hearing; b) Adopt Resolution No. 2019-101, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, California, Exempting a Public Parking Lot, Pedestrian Bridge, and Public Park from Development Standards and Permit Requirements, in Accordance with Section 20.40.040 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code (PA2019-014); c) Adopt Resolution No. 2019-102, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, California, Adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND2019-002 (SCH# 2019099074) for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project (PA2019-014); d) Approve the conceptual design for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot project including the proposed concrete bridge, parking lot and one of the following alternatives for the recreational area: Dog Park (current alternative); or Passive Recreation Area (Open Space) Adjacent to Parking Lot (similar grading as dog park alternative with a level grass area down low); or iii. Passive Recreation Area (Open Space) Adjacent to existing Sunset View Park (terraced retaining walls with a level grass area up high); and 21-1 Superior Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project — Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approval of Conceptual Design, and Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Dokken Engineering (Contract No. 8020-5) November 19, 2019 Page 2 e) Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Dokken Engineering of San Diego, California, for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot project at a not -to -exceed price of $919,890.00, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Agreement. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: The current adopted Capital Improvement Program budget includes sufficient funding for this service. It will be expensed to the FFP Parks/Community Centers account in the Public Works Department, 56201-980000-15T09. The consultant's proposed not -to - exceed fee for this service is $919,890.00. DISCUSSION: The Superior Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot conceptual design includes a new pedestrian and bicycle bridge across Superior Avenue, a larger replacement parking lot and a recreational area. The primary goals of this project are to improve safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park and to increase parking availability. The project site is located at the northeast corner of the West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue intersection, approximately 1,000 feet from the coastline. Due to the proximity to the coast, this area receives a significant amount of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Sunset Ridge Park, which is located across Superior Avenue, was constructed in December 2014 and is a 13.7 -acre active park with a baseball field, two soccer fields and children's playground. Due to California Coastal Commission permitting constraints, Sunset Ridge Park was constructed without an on-site parking lot. Visitors to Sunset Ridge Park currently use the existing smaller parking lot located south of Sunset View Park and cross Superior Avenue via an at -grade crosswalk. The existing public parking lot primarily serves visitors to the beach, Sunset View Park and Sunset Ridge Park. The area between the existing parking lot and the existing upper Sunset View Park is currently undeveloped. Refer to Attachment A for the project location. As part of the development, public review and input of the draft conceptual design, staff has been working closely with nearby communities and has held five separate community outreach meetings with the Newport Crest, Villa Balboa, Lido Sands and West Newport communities. Additionally, the draft conceptual plan was also presented to the Parks Beaches and Recreation (PB&R) Commission on August 6, 2019. The project was generally well received by the public and the PB&R Commission. Villla Balboa residents did voice concerns regarding the proposed Dog Park at the recreational area. The PB&R Commission recommended to proceed with the draft conceptual design including the concrete bridge, parking lot and the Dog Park. 21-2 Superior Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project — Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approval of Conceptual Design, and Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Dokken Engineering (Contract No. 8020-5) November 19, 2019 Page 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge The proposed new bridge across Superior Avenue would allow pedestrians and bicyclists to better access Sunset Ridge Park from the parking lot without the need to use the at -grade crosswalk. This will significantly improve pedestrian safety and access. Intersection vehicular operations will also improve since the crosswalk push button will not be activated as often, allowing more time for vehicular movement. The draft conceptual design initially included four bridge options. Two of the options were eliminated due to high construction cost. The remaining two bridge options are a single -span painted Steel Truss Bridge structure; ora three - span column -supported Concrete Bridge structure. Both of these bridge options were generally well received by the community. The Concrete Bridge appeared to be the more favorable option with the neighboring communities. The PB&R Commission also recommended the Concrete Bridge structure over the painted Steel Truss option. Attachment B includes the conceptual project design and renderings of both bridge options. Although the estimated initial construction cost for both bridge options are the same at approximately $2.6 million, the concrete bridge will require less maintenance, and therefore, is the more cost effective option for the life of the structure. Staff recommends proceeding with the Concrete Bridge structure option. Parking Lot Staff initially considered a 2 -story parking structure during the early stages of the conceptual design efforts. Due to the high construction cost associated with the parking structure, which was estimated to cost approximately $3.5 million, it was removed from the draft conceptual design. After several parking lot layouts were evaluated, the leading parking lot layout was selected and shown in the current design (Attachment B). The proposed parking lot will have 128 parking stalls and will replace the existing smaller parking lot, which currently has 64 parking stalls. Recreational Area This project also includes a new small recreational area at the northeast comer of the project site between the proposed parking lot and the existing upper Sunset View Park. This area is currently undeveloped and is known as lower Sunset View Park. The initial conceptual design includes a proposed Dog Park at this location with a fenced area for off -leash dogs, a shade structure and synthetic turf. Refer to Attachment C for the proposed Dog Park alternative. During the community outreach process, staff received several correspondences from Villa Balboa residents in opposition to the proposed Dog Park. The primary reasons for the opposition were associated with potential noise, odor and increase in traffic. During the last community meeting on October 15, 2019, Villa Balboa residents requested the City consider other alternatives for the recreational area other than a Dog Park. Three proposed alternatives for the recreational area include: 21-3 Superior Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project — Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approval of Conceptual Design, and Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Dokken Engineering (Contract No. 8020-5) November 19, 2019 Page 4 Alternative No. 1 — Dog Park (current alternative, approximately 0.2 acre in size with separated small and large dog areas) Alternative No. 2 — Passive Recreation Area (Open Space) adjacent to Parking Lot (similar grading as dog park alternative with a level grass area down low) Alternative No. 3 — Passive Recreation Area (Open Space) adjacent to existing upper Sunset View Park (terraced retaining walls with a level grass area up high) Alternative No. 2 involves significant grading and earthwork similar to the Dog Park alternative. This alternative proposes a level area at lower Sunset View Park with natural turf adjacent to the parking lot. The 2:1 sloped area between the turf and the existing upper Sunset View Park will be landscaped. The proposed fencing, shade structure and artificial turf included in the Dog Park alternative would also be eliminated with Alternative No. 2. Refer to Attachment D for a plan and cross-sectional view of this alternative. Alternative No. 3 involves constructing terraced walls at the edge of the proposed parking lot in order to create a level, natural grass area up high adjacent to the existing upper Sunset View Park. The terraced areas in front of the walls would be sloped and landscaped. The proposed grass area will be an extension of the existing upper Sunset View Park and would be accessed from the existing walkway. This alternative requires less grading and earthwork compared to Alternatives 1 or 2, and reduces the amount of soil export. Refer to Attachment E for a plan and cross-sectional view of this alternative. These alternative concept designs are only for the recreational area element and will not impact the proposed conceptual design of the pedestrian and bicycle bridge or the parking lot, which were very well received by the community and the PB&R Commission. This project will also include some minor amenities such as a drop-off area, a bike node with a fix -it station, and a drinking water fountain. Prosect Cost Estimate The estimated total project cost with the Dog Park alternative is $8,821,000, which consist of the following: Planning and Final Design Phases $1,081,000 Construction Phase $5,000,000 Construction Contingency, Material Testing & Inspection (15%) $750,000 Construction Management $700,000 Project Subtotal $7,531,000 Construction Cost Estimate Contingency (20%) $1,290,000 Grand Total $8,821,000 21-4 Superior Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project — Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approval of Conceptual Design, and Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Dokken Engineering (Contract No. 8020-5) November 19, 2019 Page 5 The estimated cost for Alternative No. 2 is slightly less than the Dog Park alternative since the synthetic turf, shade structure and fencing are not part of this alternative. It is estimated that Alternative No. 2 will cost approximately $100,000 less than the Dog Park alternative. Alternative No. 3 is also estimated to cost approximately $100,000 less than the Dog Park alternative. Although this alternative involves added cost associated with the terraced retaining walls, there is a cost savings for the reduced amount of soil export, as well as the removal of the two staircases from the parking lot to the Dog Park and the elimination of the synthetic turf, shade structure and fencing associated with the Dog Park alternative. The above cost estimate reflects Year 2021 dollars, which is when construction is anticipated to start. There is approximately $5.6 million currently budgeted for this project, which includes $2,349,600 of federal grant funding for the construction of the pedestrian/bicycle bridge. The current budget includes sufficient funding for the planning and final design phases. Additional funding of approximately $3.2 million will be requested for the FY 2020-21 CIP Budget to fund the construction phase. Professional Services Agreement with Dokken Engineering Staff requested proposals from five consulting firms to provide Professional Engineering services for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot project. Two proposals were received and reviewed by a three-person technical panel. The scoring for the proposals is as follows: PROPOSER TOTAL SCORE OVERALL RANK Dokken Engineering 262/300 1 Michael Baker International 250/300 2 Dokken Engineering demonstrated that they were the most qualified firm and have the expertise and experience needed to complete construction documents for complex bridge design projects. In addition, Dokken Engineering has successfully completed similar projects for other local agencies. As part of the proposal evaluation process, staff also confirmed that the proposed total labor hours are consistent for both firms and the billing rates for Dokken Engineering are also consistent with industry standards. Therefore, staff recommends approving a Professional Services Agreement with Dokken Engineering (Attachment H) to complete the final design efforts for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot project. The proposed Scope of Work includes field surveying, utility coordination, geotechnical engineering, hydrology and hydraulic analysis, civil design, bridge design, landscape and irrigation design, and coordination with various agencies. Construction is tentatively planned to start in summer of 2021. 21-5 Superior Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project — Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approval of Conceptual Design, and Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Dokken Engineering (Contract No. 8020-5) November 19, 2019 Page 6 Exemption Process for City -Implemented Projects Except where the bridge crosses Superior Avenue roadway, the project is located on properties zoned as Parks and Recreation (PR), and is subject to the provisions of the Zoning Code. NBMC Section 20.10.040 (Applicability of Zoning Code) provides that: "No structure shall be altered, erected, or reconstructed in any manner, nor shall any structure or land be used for any purpose, other than as allowed by this Zoning Code. The City Council may exempt specific City -implemented projects by adopting a resolution at a noticed public hearing upon setting forth the specific Code provisions that would apply in the absence of the exemption" (Emphasis added). Staff requests that the City Council consider an exemption of the development standards of NBMC Chapter 20.30 and permit requirements of NBMC Chapter 20.26 (Special Purpose Zoning Districts (OS, PC, PF, PI, and PR)). Specifically: • Section 20.30.040 (Fences, Hedges, Walls, and Retaining Walls) limits the height of retaining walls to a maximum of eight feet measured from finish grade at the base of the wall, not including any required guardrails. In this case, retaining walls around the perimeter of parking lot area may be up to 25 feet at its highest point on the southern border of the project site along West Coast Highway. The walls would gradually shorten in height from finish grade as it continues southeasterly along West Coast highway and northeasterly along Superior Avenue. Raising the grade of the parking lot and bridge abutment is necessary to provide a walkable bridge with a 3 percent slope from the parking lot to the park, to provide adequate vertical clearance under the bridge to Superior Avenue below, and to balance earthwork to the greatest extent possible. The design will strategically include landscaping to screen, soften and buffer planned retaining walls. • Section 20.30.060 (Height Limits and Exceptions) limits the height of nonresidential structures with flat roofs in the Shoreline Height Limit Area to 26 feet. In this case, the bridge structure will be up to approximately 36 feet tall on the east side of Superior Avenue and 38.2 feet tall on the west side of Superior Avenue as measured from existing grade. This height is necessary to provide sufficient vertical clearance under the bridge as required by the California Highway Design Manual. • Section 20.26.020 (Special Purpose Zoning Districts Land Uses and Permit Requirements) requires a minor use permit for active and passive parks and recreational facilities and for parking facilities. The purpose of a minor use permit is to provide a process for reviewing uses and associated operational characteristics that may be appropriate in the zoning district, but whose effects on a site and surroundings cannot be determined before being proposed for a specific site. In this case, Council is reviewing the project and its compatibility with surrounding uses in its entirety through the public design and development process. 21-6 Superior Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project — Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approval of Conceptual Design, and Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Dokken Engineering (Contract No. 8020-5) November 19, 2019 Page 7 NBMC Title 21 (Local Coastal Implementation Plan The Project site is located in the Coastal Zone and is within the City's coastal permitting jurisdiction. The parking lot, bridge, and recreational area are considered new development and the associated coastal development permit will therefore be reviewed by the Zoning Administrator upon completion of the preliminary design. The bridge abutment at Sunset Ridge Park will be processed as an amendment to the existing Sunset Ridge Park coastal development permit and will be reviewed separately by the California Coastal Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared by Chambers Group, Incorporated, in accordance with the implementing guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and City Council Policy K- 3. The MND was routed to the City Council in advance of this staff report to allow additional time to review the report. A copy of the MND is available on the City's website, at each Newport Beach Public Library, and at the City Hall Community Development Department. The MND does not identify any component of the project that would result in a "potentially significant impact" on the environment per CEQA guidelines. Based on the analysis of the Initial Study (IS), the environmental categories within which the project would either have no impact or less than significant impact were: Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use/Planning, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation, Utilities and Sewer Services and Wildfire. Based on the analysis of the IS, the environmental categories within which the project would have potentially significant impacts were Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Tribal Cultural Resources. Specific mitigation measures have been included to reduce the potentially significant adverse effects to a less than significant level. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared for consideration and is attached to the final IS/MND. The MND was made available for public review for a 30 -day comment period from September 23, 2019, to October 23, 2019. Staff has received a total of 27 comment letters. Although not required under CEQA, written responses have been prepared for each of the comment letters. The comment letters and responses have been attached to the final IS/MND. Several comment letters were received both in favor and in opposition to the Dog Park as proposed. City Council may consider other alternative designs as described in this staff report for the recreational area. An Errata to the MND has been prepared to ensure that all project alternatives have been considered and included in the CEQA analysis. 21-7 Superior Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project — Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approval of Conceptual Design, and Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Dokken Engineering (Contract No. 8020-5) November 19, 2019 Page 8 NOTICING: Notice of this public hearing was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to all owners and residential occupants of property within 300 feet of the boundaries of the site (excluding intervening rights-of-way and waterways), including the applicant, and posted on the subject property at least 10 days before the scheduled hearing, consistent with the provisions of the Municipal Code. Additionally, the item appeared on the agenda for this meeting, which was posted at City Hall and on the City website. As part of the MND public review process, the City mailed the Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt an MND with a detailed description of the project and MND public review period and process in the manner described above. Notices were also posted on both sides of Superior Avenue near pedestrian and vehicle access points to the properties. The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item). ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Location Map Attachment B — Conceptual Design (Bridge and Parking Lot) Attachment C — Dog Park Alternative Attachment D — Open Space Adjacent to Parking Lot Alternative Attachment E — Open Space Adjacent to Sunset View Park Alternative Attachment F —Resolution No. 2019-101 (Exemptions) Attachment G — Resolution No. 2019-102 (Final IS/MND with MMRP, Comment Letter and Responses and Errata to MND) Attachment H — Professional Services Agreement Attachment I — Public Comments 21-8 ATTACHMENT A N \ Z \ NEWPORT SUNSET RIDGE PARK \ CREST \ \ ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PARKING VILLA - BALBOA SUNSET VI — PAR ---- LIDO LIDO RECREATIONAL SANDS AREA \ G' \ HOAG HOSPITAL o4sr � LOWER CAMPUS RgVF v \ VILLAGE SHOPPING \ p CENTER03 �\ 'WIN JACK"IN . A �. o THE BOX -- _ H E3 x SUPERIOR AVENUE PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH BRIDGE AND PARKING LOT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT A - LOCATION MAP C-7088-1 11/19/2019 21.9 x 39.8 38.3 6.9 x 8 42.39 30 X TTACHMENT B 0 40.5 x X37.9 O 37.8 x 40.8 x 13 o ❑❑❑❑❑ 38.5 X O _,cam \ x 46.3 44-7 \ \ \ / 45.6 \ 56.4 41.3 x \ \ x \ j \ SUNSET RIDGE PARK? X45.1 x55.2 56.5 41.4 \ 54.4 \ x o x \ 44.5 x \ 43.8 x \ 56.9 yc. \ \ x x O g � � D o o 71.2 64.4 \ 64.7 ° 64.7 x x a 64.6 \ 64.8 64.5 64.5 ° x 63.9 00 \ X 64.2 6.4 x 63.9 O x 63.7 X 67.5 63.6 x 62.8\ 0 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII�� mmouuu � �, moi„ �� v El � � � � � I I I VIA mom! If SIPM11900001MINN Mil- �♦mam.-MEmma" FLN74 MAP, IWO Aw AV P -Tp ®R ..- , , iiii, ,,iii • --------------------------------------------- I`C'I p� .:•-' � Sri i� �i�i�i�i♦ ♦i���"� �♦��� � • �� I - \ , , ♦iii .�•�, � � � � ♦ .-. ��� - ,`j! ♦I / I I .♦ III` I I♦I ♦I ' •,,, ', •♦,'•,,, :, .� - - - •. �i ,iii vii♦iii? , i , � � / � .. ...,... iii♦ iiiii � ��'-�1e.-> ee, IIII IIII IIII IIII � � 1C� �C� e• eee•.eeee• • ' I • • .. , .,.❖ems i .,...0000❖e. �♦� ,�i♦i♦i♦i i♦i♦i♦i♦i �,�,�, \ � ® � � / '�� ��� � `•..00•.000•... ��:�`�: ,♦iib: i�,�i♦:. ...,❖.❖.❖... ... ,.,.,,,., ,.,.,.,, :tel I � ill • �� � . A 0 IAs . �.•�•%iiiiiiii e . � / � . I III I • - n. ee eeeeeeeOr. �e�eeeeeeee. � e�•eeeeeee. �� �� • ._ e, eeeleee-. O•eeeeee♦ � • .i ��� ���• 1 I �� I�� . ��y .e00iiiiiii . , A �� i :D ,.. I • �eeeeeee � I • , • R,C. ••,ee•••••4•ieei • • • � • . I Imo` - , • eeiiiiiie. � I I I • � � � `.�••�• � 1 � / eee•Nee = / o A `•� eo sse• --____ �a-'y� ee • �eee zee.- , � sao� eee. , ,�•i • � �� r { i❖i❖.•ii e' oos � � • �ce•e•. ee•. • 81.8 79.1 x x, 80.2 x 80.6 X X 81.5 C 73.4 I � SU*N T X7�VI W I � I I 74.7 \ � I x 74.8 ' / 74.3 / 05 x 73.4 x73.4 X 0 HOAG HOSPITAL X8.6 \ \ ``` 9.7 W W W W W W W W W W \ N \ 0 \ 64 Ok x21.7 •� y,4 \ � x 65 � � � � O O � X \ W W W W ~ \ 10.1 • \r° b�J ° 21.8 k l 8. --x \ 9. `® W W W W W W W W W W c' - \ \ T°p ° X O X20.8 0 x22.2 W W W S x 9.4 ®, 1-1\ x 9.5 21.3 \ �.... -W W W W \ x 0 8.7 LI 9.5 x �\ O x xx 10.1 10.3 `\ l O x20.9 11.3 x \ x 7.7 x10.y x9.5\ \ \ 6 21.9 9 2 � d II ` 10.1 X o \ _ O / O 9.6 O 7.5 0 j 8.88. i / x / \ \ 9. \ 9.1 6 ' \\ x \ \ POOL � ;\ \ X \ \ 9.4 J 9.6 _ x 49.1 9.2 x �\ x % 9.7 DENSE TREES x 9.2 x \ 9 10.6 .1 \ X \ 8.9 5 X8.8 x \ 10.6 x x/ x10.6 ® x9.4 / �� � / \ 7.5 / / /8.9 8.7 10.6 8.5 \\ / 9.8 \ 8.4 x 8.4 x 8.1 x � x O 0 8.2 x 7 O 7.8 7.2 x ° o O o 7.5 GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 60 (IN FEET) 1 inch = 30 feet 8.1 7.5 4 8.4 X 7.9 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 N0. DATE 8.2 9.3 8.5 8.4 7.8 8.1 88 REVISIONS \ 10. x � \ 9.8 \ \ X 9.7 \ X X10.3 9.9 X 10.4 \ X x 9.6 URBAN RESOURCE CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 23 MAUCHLY, SUITE 110 IRVINE, CA 92618 PHONE: 949-727-9095 FAX: 949-727-9098 TERRY P. AU, RCE 68466 DATE 9.7 x 0 9.6 x QROFESS/p RRY P. F 2 C 68466 m yt EXP. 9-30-19 tit P,ql CIVIC F CF 9.5 k� x � - d 20.3 x o\\ 20.2 x x 10.8 \\ C ---- `6JJJ \ Xaa X10.1 10.5 U x 20.4 17. r O O 40.6 x 0 0 O �QO \ x 21.9 O 18.4 x X 18.4 17.3 / X 68.4 68.5 x 18.4 17.3 x16/ 1 10.9 - 1 X i ATTACHMENT B -CONCEPTUAL DESIGN CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 100 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 PHONE: 949-644-3315 SUPERIOR AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE BRIDGE AND PARKING LOT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DATE: It co T 9-18-19 N O z coO SHEETCI-40F X 0 w cn g Ln w ~ w I 1 I (.03 � N � � Fn 0- _f) Xcf) w co Q 0 X i 00 W N z . Q w 0 0 0 Z w o z U z O J i AMMA 40 lot 4ft t "qft 41 oil —� ,alk mor 401 . Al .A 4: 4P yl - 4 rr AF s %BMW r > > AVI - • Y �..� do 40 _A joi/ { frf 1rlf�/1 r,,/ f .oi iff r Fjoo he r I a .0 .0's" A/p4,0*f Opfer ATTACHMENT B - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (STEEL TRUSS BRIDGE LOOKING NORTH) w -got SaML ' �r •r i �� r u tilop•'� 1i tom+. imp i • Aut_ r - r • 't .7�,' \ _ �4J1'rr11JJ -Ic ' V i►[ r f I- f• r• r "Vo N' [ � f 'f _ � 1� , � ,liL • �: f �. , 1. ! � + � y �� y �`= - r Tom- "�- '• 1 t+'' • t _ T Y� •r JL 7 ; e 1 •R de 00 �,.f 4r L =Ri od lose AOL f B - GONGEPTUALC t 36 w Ap •_,fit f � `� Vol. Lt Ar - f ' r, 3 - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (STEEL TRUSS BRIDGE FROM BELC AL r _ - ■tet �,...r. ��i • — Lam—'-^ a - r l � � � ++±yam 'jy _ ,. . 4 t s �. ...r.r' � tit -� v IT i '- CA __ - IWO� ATTACHMENT B - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (STEEL TRUSS BRIDGE FROM PARKING LOT) 21-14 . - - `' .�,- -- r - ��L +r. f - _ .. Rti } • • •~..--••- r mow. ►_, _• �` - mow. _ •'. - - .�.+ •�� •��Yf L�� - C" .... ` _� - � — _ T� .. _ �� - �`T � _ r �Y �«fir .1=��L-�,�+�`r. �;���. - _- -•_ � �r s V j _ +�. �_ �r - �' a �� Tyy `. ' � � - ��.►��F �__ _ _� �-� ` rt. , ��.k �r r �� ��'�. Y �- _ •- �{• •J ` 'yam `• ��T.•�L. - ;-�� * . �.- f-.�L��--L ZN Y 7r"F ATTACHMENT B - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (STEEL TRUSS BRIDGE FROM PARKING LOT) 21-14 00 -rem i his, slow �,.r- 4w � R . L `+ �. Will _1pyly� T - _ ` _ - }" - - t T -;� �' :'• + • _ _ _ F dpl • WX- r ` ; y , y 3 ~ Al dl Apl #� + --} � __ + ice} � ��t � #" FF VAP �''-� - _ " ,. Y-� { it._+r .Tip_ • -_ - F IPIL t _ -- - - _ �F` •'• ;_ - �'� • + wp dill ab FAIL 'w LP 72 _ # •` f�IL L tOWl ml L i do f _ } _• * 1b 1 - _ _._ . d jt f ,'Ilhl_ - r i # # # - aIL - L 4k- L p t _ _i i _ ir - f11111dw - t 4Pr — - je Jew i rye J�}�F■ a �+'^�.i.p jo 10A ml ML 17 m Ado }� w + L , } iit+�f��ii��, - e X10 Ill r+� �m�XA� *. - l�r; �' ■ _ _ ` L a r - y r # ~�} R d - dl } #= f r F _ -ka PAM 41l �MT. r��# t h + * 4 _ 1 f- Jr irr s - r f � ol i ti f Wr L -, K wr• � � IP F X#,� -.w T i i i + r 14 r L , k #* } ••• do t' r 1' a� ATTACHMENT B -CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (STEEL TRUSS BRIDGE WITH PARKING 21-15 ♦`" -ns- - - _ •� - - ' pp-pp- --gem AEC- pr 4�w _01 6,; N-19kToll-4 .4— lw loor i f ~`WINow - - - ap Jr Ilk. of Y _ # OM' • `y� a ]}�.���r�� r _ ` .. '� ^�Si �� � "► _ �+ AN • XV m► 4-4 df • � 40.44600>—. 40w* � •� 45 At -yam 41 JhLw 4TTACHMFNT B - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (CONCRFTF BRIDGE LOOKING NORTH) ''�"-?'�-.4� `fit • � � . �. y `�{ _ HtI v • ! � ~ =+.I � �_ _ ,may' • �_ ` � r _ h -r L�" .f. r#�R _ i _ Y � ti? � _I r . + � , r. i • ji�'� �� �. . � � 'v� - r ; j i•' � - 1_ r.:- - ir dt— Apo — x _► J -J t � A r i Y rlBM- AO AV f �v T 40' .t�f :�K�� o �y � � mei ■ 91 MCI [h . t[K! 0I0' I ao —4� NO _ L � it 4 ' • A - i 1. M � - � of - - ��r � +; -�.• .-. _ _ � _- 1 - u 41 .. ` •s y,�..-.� ., •. _ ., #_ ,moi � ti!r � _4/' - � l � �lr# ���•. le 0 ' - •�. �� ! �r���� �,�� h� w [E•` -._mss ' "3•v 4 _ s L ATTACHMENT B - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (CONCRETE BRIDGE FROM BELOW) I 21-18 0 A i 1 S � r � i . �r � art`". -ti 0r rim p" PA . p _--�..-, �r � _ � �- � _ �� '7" �-. - fir- �~�� •- � ��'�rw `� _ � ' _,, ..� - � } + ate, - ..r�r'-_ - `� �'� � '•` .'4_-a' - -- ._ 5 1 ` - .'-� • y - •-a.►�•. m -'ti v - - k _ -�,_ - �� _ y "-'mat 4 , • +� tiI -. �+ L , R� � ` ��' �R� r '�f •- �. � - - � ` - • � � � .�,� \ � w - - fir �! • - 1 - do ATTACHMENT B - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (CONCRETE BRIDGE FROM PARKING LOT) J o- l 21-19 . 1 { � � �` � � /' — . — -•.JR4. � rt '�yV AJ •S ^.� ' � �W �• 4�+ - ,tel-�-- __ i Imo. . ... fr: C `- � •- wiry -. - � �_ �_ _ .� - _! - y {. 0r rim PA . p _--�..-, �r � _ � �- � _ �� '7" �-. - fir- �~�� •- � ��'�rw `� _ � ' _,, ..� - � } + ate, - ..r�r'-_ - `� �'� � '•` .'4_-a' - -- ._ 5 1 ` - .'-� • y - •-a.►�•. m -'ti v - - k _ -�,_ - �� _ y "-'mat 4 , • +� tiI -. �+ L , R� � ` ��' �R� r '�f •- �. � - - � ` - • � � � .�,� \ � w - - fir �! • - 1 - do ATTACHMENT B - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (CONCRETE BRIDGE FROM PARKING LOT) J o- 21-19 10 _�- r • + - id S �_i r _ _ _ _ - -04 .yam or mo * * +tea- �� ti -�T �r }_ f �- -y�� f� -#' '� - i -� - �' �- - - .' . L ' ,.+ -•� 'L � 'III IL � '• _ � + _. Yom` 4' –__ _ = _ �r � 4 #_�� i f!� ~ - _ f i• rr - } _ - �tiL ri �• 1'i i - F - F�� r 't _ _ '•'* 1.0hr— � F�- :`{; - �.. ��-�ti�a _ •� a{ Tom.-' aFa+4= 40 do 9 9 Olt 91 RIP mr Ll – + – - � - r� + '* r T S PIZ .00IPL r - _ low Nor VoT dLdo f ; '4 4 -Idr i. 44i } qlr 4r jo AMM mr ar 1.36 T� {#= _ � � � � r tr'F��'•*r t ���r�++.. rte} ��� i r r t * 4"miafi� jr" Zra jr M s M - f NO y6 OL! �f PPENI `y ■ - a - ydiL i� -,I- 1116 a r PL- A _ILar � } *f}' ; - 5 A 4 s -- -: k 41k ` N i. % �3 AL do ATTACHMENT B — CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (CONCRETE BRIDGE WITH PARKING LOT) ~+ 21-20 DISTANCE FROM VILLA BALBOA BUILDING TO DOG PARK (MIN 260') PROPOSED DOG PARK ---- --A 1 1\VI VJ I\L I/lII YIIYV 11 - ATTACHMENT C ALTERNATIVE NO. 1 - DOG PARK AT LOWER SUNSET VIEW PARK (CROSS-SECTIONAL VIEW) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT C-7088-1 11/19/2019 -110 -100 - 90 - 80 - 70 - 60 - 50 - 40 - 30 PROPOSED PASSIVE RECREATION AREA ATTACHMENT D ALTERNATIVE NO. 2 - PASSIVE RECREATION AREA AT LOWER SUNSET VIEW PARK (CROSS-SECTIONAL VIEW) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT C-7088-1 11/19/2019 -110 -100 - 90 - 80 - 70 - 60 - 50 - 40 - 30 21-24 ATTACHMENT E SUPERIOR -� AVEA VENUE, f _ r� 77T777 -- A L 2 2 2 2 - ... a--- SUNSET VIEW PARK PASSIVE RECREATION AREA EXTENSION _ 0 1 OF UPPER SUNSET VIEW PARK .. o ] 00.1 ACRES �, 6$ 0 a- (OPEN SPACE) ' 69 990 , =� X 74.s 98 � T � 40'a f 6 ]2 96 0 . ✓� ]3 95 0 �' [ 5 49 74 84 93 r ti 51 75 9 ' 76 52 91 t 53 3� 7 78 90 a v \ 79 89 , p 8 `. HOAG HOSPITAL �% 55 80 8 59 R� tip..-.; ^ G •.__. p • 21.9 °� 65.,-- ATTACHMENT E CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ALTERNATIVE NO.3 - PASSIVE RECREATION AREA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT EXTENSION OF UPPER SUNSET VIEW PARK (PLAN VIEW) C-7088-1 1 11/19/2019 P�d�1 9 s x PROPOSED PARKING LOT EXISTING EARTHEN MOUND PROPOSED PASSIVE RECREATIONAL AREA I EXISTING EXTENSION OF UPPER SUNSET VIEW PARK SUNSET VIEW PARK (OPEN SPACE) EXISTING GRASS PROPOSED GRASS PROPOSED TERRACE RETAINING WALLS (3) ATTACHMENT E ALTERNATIVE NO. 3 - PASSIVE RECREATION AREA EXTENSION OF UPPER SUNSET VIEW PARK (CROSS-SECTIONAL VIEW) VILLA BALBOA (PRIVATE PROPERTY) EXISTING t 26' ACCESS ROAD w�-- UII-- QII SII UII zll Es EXISTING WALL JII 511 mll II UII z t EL 74' iii NII IIJIIJIOII�i���.. .mil xll EXISTING SUNSET VIEW PARK WALKWAY t EL 74' CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT C-7088-1 11/19/2019 -110 -100 - 90 - 80 - 70 - 60 - 50 - 40 - 30 ATTACHMENT F RESOLUTION NO. 2019-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, EXEMPTING A PUBLIC PARKING LOT, PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, AND PUBLIC PARK FROM DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 20.10.040 OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (PA2019-014) WHEREAS, the proposed Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project ("Project") is currently within the design stage. Based on the conceptual design and in anticipation of future procedural steps, this resolution serves to provide relief and flexibility in the final design phases through exemptions to Title 20 (Planning and Zoning) development standards,- WHEREAS, tandards; WHEREAS, the Project is located on the existing Sunset Ridge Park and parking lot at 4850 West Coast Highway and the northeast corner of the West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue intersection in the City of Newport Beach, California ("Properties"). The Project would include the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge over Superior Avenue, connecting Sunset Ridge Park to a new asphalt parking lot created at the northeast corner of West Coast Highway, as well as create a recreational area on a total of 3.4 acres. The pedestrian and bicycle bridge structure will be approximately 240 to 280 feet long, twelve (12) to sixteen (16) feet wide, and eight (8) to sixteen (16) feet tall. The bottom of the bridge would be approximately twenty (20) feet above Superior Avenue at its highest point. The new parking lot would consist of approximately 100 to 128 parking spaces. The fenced recreational area would be 0.2 to 0.3 acres in size; WHEREAS, the City's fiscal year 2019-2020 Capital Improvement Program calls for the construction of the Superior Avenue overcrossing and replacement of the existing parking lot with a larger parking lot and small recreation area; WHEREAS, the Properties are designated Parks and Recreation (PR) by the Land Use Element of the City of Newport Beach's General Plan ("General Plan") which is intended to provide active public or private recreational uses, including parks (both active and passive), golf courses, marina support facilities, aquatic facilities, tennis clubs and courts, private recreation, and similar facilities. The Properties are located within the Parks and Recreation (PR) Zoning District, which is intended to provide for areas appropriate for land used or for active public or private recreational use,- WHEREAS, se; WHEREAS, the Superior Avenue right-of-way is designated as primary arterial, typically consisting of a four lane divided roadway in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The Superior Avenue right-of-way is not located within a zoning district or coastal zoning district nor does it have a Coastal Land Use Plan designation; 21-27 Resolution No. 2019 - Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS, the Properties are located in the Coastal Zone. The Properties are located within the Parks and Recreation (PR) Coastal Land Use Plan category and Parks and Recreation (PR) Coastal Zoning District. The Project will require a Coastal Development Permit and an amendment to the Sunset Ridge Park Coastal Development Permit No. 5-11-302; WHEREAS, the use of the Property for the Project is consistent with the purpose and intent of these designations; WHEREAS, Section 20.10.040(A) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code ("NBMC") authorizes the City Council to exempt City implemented projects by adopting a resolution at a noticed public hearing upon setting forth the specific NBMC provisions that apply in the absence of the exemption; WHEREAS, to allow the City flexibility to implement a functional recreational area, parking lot, and pedestrian and bicycle bridge to support park activities that serve the public, flexibility to meet the standards and requirements set forth in Title 20 of the NBMC, including the minor use permit requirement for a park use (Sections 20.26.010- 20.26.030 — Special Purpose Zoning Districts), maximum building height of the bridge structure and all parking lot structures (Section 20.30.060 — Height Limits and Exceptions), and maximum wall and retaining wall height (Section 20.30.040 — Fences, Hedges, Walls, and Retaining Walls), is necessary, WHEREAS, the Project is consistent with the PR General Plan Land Use Designation, which does not include floor area limitations or setback requirements; WHEREAS, the Project is consistent with the PR Zoning District, which does not include setback requirements; WHEREAS, the Project would result in a net increase of parking spaces. The final design and layout of all parking areas and loading areas shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Traffic Engineer and the Public Works Department; WHEREAS, a public meeting was held by the Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Commission on August 6, 2019, in the City Council Chambers, located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the California Government Code Section 54950 et seq. ("Ralph M. Brown Act") and by providing written notice to properties within 300 feet of the Project. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Commission at this public meeting. At this public meeting, the Commission recommended City Council approval of the Project design; and 21-28 Resolution No. 2019 - Page 3 of 4 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 19, 2019, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, Chapter 20.62 of the NBMC and Section 21092(b) of the Public Resources Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the City Council at this public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach resolves as follows.. Section 1: In accordance with Section 20.10.040 (A) of the NBMC, the City Council does hereby exempt the Project located at 4850 West Coast Highway and the northeast corner of the West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue intersection in the City of Newport Beach, California, as depicted on Exhibit A, from Sections 20.26.010 through 20.26.030, Section 20.30.040 and Section 20.30.060 as set forth in Title 20 (Planning and Zoning) of the NBMC. Section 2: The recitals provided in this resolution are true and correct and are incorporated into the operative part of this resolution. Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 4: The Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH No. 2019099074) was prepared for the Project in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") set forth in Public Resources Code section 21000 of seq., CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines set forth in the California Code of Regulations, Title 14 Division 6, Chapter 3, and City Council Policy K-3. By Resolution No. 2019-_, the City Council, having final approval authority over the project, adopted and certified as complete and adequate the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH No. 2019099074) and adopted "Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program." Resolution No. 2019-_ is hereby incorporated by reference. 21-29 Resolution No. 2019 - Page 4 of 4 Section 5: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting the resolution. ADOPTED this 19th day of November 2019. Diane B. Dixon Mayor ATTEST: Leilani I. Brown City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Aaron C. Harp City Attorney Attachment(s): Exhibit A - Aerial Map 21-30 Exhibit A — General Location of Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot E s NEWPORT SUNSET RIDGE PARK \\ CREST' /Ire ADDITIONAL a PUBLIC PARKING VILLA RA� OA ti ° AAR --- RECREATIONAL � 44S _ .. AREA .,+ WES7.00 HOAG HOSPRAL LOWERCALIPQ$ uiLLAGE{9"PP 4 .tip_ CEFMR 10 o _THE BOX EXHIBIT A CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUPERIOR AVENUE PED ESTRIAN/81CYCLE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BRIDGE AND PARKING LOT LOCATION MAP C-8020 11/19/2019 21-31 ATTACHMENT G RESOLUTION NO. 2019-102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. ND2019-002, (SCH# 2019099074) FOR THE SUPERIOR AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE BRIDGE AND PARKING LOT PROJECT (PA2019-014) WHEREAS, the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project ("Project") is located on the existing Sunset Ridge Park and parking lot at 4850 West Coast Highway and the northeast corner of the West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue intersection ("Properties") in the City of Newport Beach, California; WHEREAS, Sunset Ridge Park and the parking lot Properties are designated Parks and Recreation (PR) by the Land Use Element of the General Plan ("General Plan") which is intended to provide active public or private recreational uses, including parks (both active and passive), golf courses, marina support facilities, aquatic facilities, tennis clubs and courts, private recreation, and similar facilities. The Properties are located within the Parks and Recreation (PR) Zoning District, which is intended to provide for areas appropriate for land used or proposed for active public or private recreational use; WHEREAS, the Properties are located in the Coastal Zone. The Properties are located within the Parks and Recreation (PR) Coastal Land Use Plan category and Parks and Recreation (PR) Coastal Zoning District. The Project will require a Coastal Development Permit and an amendment to the Sunset Ridge Park Coastal Development Permit No. 5-11-302; WHEREAS, the Superior Avenue right-of-way is designated as primary arterial which is typically a four lane divided roadway in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The Superior Avenue right-of-way is not located within a zoning district or coastal zoning district nor does it have a Coastal Land Use Plan designation; WHEREAS, the use of the Property and right-of-way for the Project is consistent with the purpose and intent of these designations; WHEREAS, the City's fiscal year 2019-2020 Capital Improvement Program calls for the construction of the Superior Avenue overcrossing and replacement of the existing parking lot with a larger parking lot and small recreation area; 21-32 Resolution No. 2019- _ Page 2 of 5 WHEREAS, construction of the Project will: (1) improve safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk; (2) provide additional parking spaces to better serve both passive uses and organized sporting events at Sunset Ridge Park in an area where parking is limited; (3) reduce traffic signal wait times by shifting pedestrian and bicycle traffic from the at -grade crosswalk to the bridge; and (4) expand recreational options in this part of the City by developing a small recreational area just below Sunset View Park; WHEREAS, a public meeting was held by the Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Commission on August 6, 2019, in the City Council Chambers, located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the public meeting was given in accordance with the California Government Code Section 54950 et seq. ("Ralph M. Brown Act") and providing written notice to properties within 300 feet of the Project. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Commission at this public meeting. At this public meeting, the Commission recommended City Council approval of the Project design; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council on November 19, 2019, in the City Council Chambers, located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, Chapter 20.62 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code ("NBMC") and Section 21092(b) of the Public Resources Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the City Council at this meeting; and WHEREAS, after thoroughly considering the Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") for the Project, and the public testimony and written submissions of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council finds the following facts, findings, and reasons to support adopting the MND: 1. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq. ("CEQA"), Sections 15000 et seq. of the California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 ("CEQA Guidelines"), and City Council Policy K-3, the Project meets the definition of a project, as defined in Section 21080 of CEQA and Section 15002 of the CEQA Guidelines, and as such subject to environmental review. 2. The City caused to be prepared an Initial Study/MND in compliance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and City Council Policy K-3. 21-33 Resolution No. 2019- _ Page 3 of 5 3. Notice of the availability of the draft MND was provided and, as required by 21091(b) of CEQA, the draft MND was made available for public review for a thirty (30) day comment period beginning on September 23, 2019 and ending October 23, 2019. Notice of the Availability of the draft MND was given in accordance with Section 21091(d) and (f) and 21092. Twenty eight (28) comment letters were received during the thirty (30) day public review period. 4. Although not required pursuant to CEQA, written responses to the twenty eight (28) comments received were prepared. The comments and responses were considered by the City Council while considering the adoption of the MND. The comments to the MND and responses to comments do not change the determinations or represent a significant departure that warrant recirculation of the MND because no new avoidable significant effects were identified. 5. Pursuant to Section 21080.3.1 of CEQA, the City is required to consult with California Native American tribes that have requested in writing to be informed of proposed projects in the geographic area that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the tribe. Two (2) tribes had requested notification in writing at the time the notification was prepared. The tribes were provided notice on June 27, 2019. Section 21080.3.1 requires thirty (30) days prior to City Council action to allow tribe contacts to respond to the request to consult. A response letter was received from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation on July 8, 2019, requesting that a monitor from their tribe oversee ground -disturbing construction work. Staff consulted with their representative, Mr. Andrew Salas, by phone and in writing regarding the matter. Mr. Salas expressed concern with the Project's proximity to potential tribal cultural resources. In response, and out of abundance of caution, the City has agreed to retain a tribal monitor in the unlikely event any resources are found and the MND a mitigation measure has been included accordingly. As a result, Mr. Salas, the representative for the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians- Kizh Nation, agreed that the implementation of this mitigation measure would be sufficient and the consultation was closed. 21-34 Resolution No. 2019- _ Page 4 of 5 6. The following environmental factors were identified as potentially affected by the implementation of the Project: Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Energy, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use/Planning, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Utilities and Sewer Services and Wildfire. These topics were the subject of the MND analysis, and potential impacts were identified. The MND includes mitigation measures to reduce the potentially significant adverse effects to a less than significant level related to Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Tribal Cultural Resources. All other environmental factors, identified above, were determined to have no impact, or less than significant impact. 7. The draft MND and the final MND which includes the Responses to Comments, Errata, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("Final MND") are attached as Exhibits "A", "B", and "C," respectively, and incorporated herein by reference. The documents and all related materials, which constitute the record upon which this decision was based, are on file with the Planning Division (Bay 1- B), City of Newport Beach, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. 8. On the basis of the entire environmental review record, the Project, with mitigation measures, will have a less than significant impact upon the environment and there are no known substantial adverse effects on human beings that would be caused. Additionally, there are no long-term environmental goals that are compromised by the Project, nor cumulative impacts anticipated in connection with the Project. The mitigation measures identified by the Final MND and incorporated in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are feasible and will reduce potential environmental impacts to a less than significant level. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, California, resolves as follows: Section 1: The City Council of the City of Newport Beach does hereby adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND2019-002 (SCH# 2019099074), which is attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B" and "C", and which are incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: The City Council of the City of Newport Beach directs the Public Works Director to incorporate the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MND included in Exhibit "C" in the plans and specifications for the Project to be implemented. 21-35 Resolution No. 2019- _ Page 5 of 5 Section 3: The recitals provided in this resolution are true and correct and are incorporated into the operative part of this resolution, and constitute, in part, the findings of the City Council for the adoption of the MND No. ND2019-002 SCH# 2019099074. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 5: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council and the City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting the resolution. ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 2019. Diane B. Dixon Mayor ATTEST: Leilani I. Brown City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Aaron C. Harp City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A — Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Exhibit B - Final Mitigated Negative Declaration Exhibit C - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 21-36 Exhibit "A" Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration • Notice of Intent to Adopt • Initial Study • Environmental Analysis • Appendices • Responses to Comments • Errata Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND2019-002 (PA2019-014 State Clearinghouse Number 2019099074 (Available separate due to bulk) www. newportbeachca.gov/ceaa 21-37 Exhibit "B" Final Mitigated Negative Declaration including Responses to Comments and Errata Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND2019-002 (PA2019-014) State Clearinghouse Number 2019099074 21-38 FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SUPERIOR AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE BRIDGE AND PARKING LOT PROJECT Newport Beach, CA (Orange County) Prepared for: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Prepared by: CHAMBERS GROUP, INC. 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 750 Santa Ana, California 92707 November 5, 2019 21-39 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beoch, California TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1.0 — PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING...............................................4 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW..................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 CEQA REQUIREMENTS..................................................................................................................4 1.3 PURPOSE OF INITIAL STUDY......................................................................................................... 4 1.4 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE.................................................................................................. 4 1.5 LOCATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS........................................................................................ 6 1.6 PROJECT PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES............................................................................................ 6 1.7 PROJECT DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................. 7 1.7.1 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge.............................................................. 7 1.7.2 Superior Parking Lot......................................................................................................... 8 1.7.3 Dog Park........................................................................................................................... 9 1.7.4 Construction.....................................................................................................................9 1.8 REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS.......................................................................................... 9 SECTION2.0 — FINDINGS...................................................................................................................11 SECTION 3.0 — MITIGATION MEASURES............................................................................................12 SECTION4.0—CIRCULATION.............................................................................................................15 SECTION 5.0 — COMMENTS AND RESPONSES....................................................................................16 5.1 CEQA REQUIREMENTS REGARDING COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ........................................... 16 5.2 COMMENTS AND RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE DRAFT IS/MND .................... 16 SECTION 6.0 — REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ...............................148 SECTION 7.0 — MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION.......................................................................153 SECTION 8.0 — REFERENCES......................................................... ......154 Chambers Group, Inc. 21169 21-40 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Commenting Individuals and Agencies ......................................................................................... 16 Chambers Group, Inc. 21169 21-41 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California SECTION 1.0 — PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW The City of Newport Beach (City) proposes the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue, a new larger parking lot with a range of 100 to 128 parking spaces and a fenced dog park (Project) on an approximately 3.4 -acre site. The proposed bridge will connect Sunset Ridge Park to the new asphalt parking lot located at the northeast corner of West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. 1.2 CEQA REQUIREMENTS In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Sections 2100- 21177) and pursuant to Section 15063 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), the City, acting in the capacity of Lead Agency, is required to undertake the preparation of an Initial Study (IS) to determine if the proposed project would have a significant environmental impact. If the Lead Agencyfinds that there is no evidence that the project, either as proposed or as modified to include the mitigation measures identified in the IS, may cause a significant effect on the environment, the Lead Agency must find that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment and must prepare a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration for that project. Such determination can be made only if, "there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Lead Agency" that such impacts may occur (Section 21080(c), Public Resources Code). This environmental documentation is intended as a formal document undertaken to provide an environmental basis for subsequent discretionary actions upon the project. The resulting documentation is not, however, a policy document and its approval and/or certification neither presupposes nor mandates any actions on the part of those agencies from whom permits, and other discretionary approvals would be required. The environmental documentation and supporting analysis are subject to a public review period. Following review of any comments received, the City of Newport Beach will consider these comments as part of the Project's environmental review and include them with the IS documentation for consideration by the City. 1.3 PURPOSE OF INITIAL STUDY The City has prepared this IS to provide the public and responsible agencies with information about the potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of the proposed Project. This IS includes a project -level analysis of the potential effects associated with the Project. 1.4 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines 15150 — Incorporation by Reference, this Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration shall incorporate by reference all or portions of other technical documents and reports as a matter of public record. The documents listed below relate to the proposed Project or provides additional materials related to the proposed Project setting. Where all or part of another document is incorporated by reference, the incorporated language shall be considered to be set forth in full as part of the text of this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. The information incorporated Chambers Group, Inc. 4 21169 21-42 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California into this document is referenced in Section 5. References. The information is based on the following technical studies and/or planning documents. City of Newport Beach General Plan (Approved on November 7, 2006) The General Plan Environmental Impact report addresses the potential environmental effects of the City of Newport Beach's proposed General Plan Updates. This is a comprehensive plan that discusses the future potential growth and development within the City. The General Plan consists of ten of elements that covers the following areas: • Land Use Element • Harbor and Bay Element • Housing Element • Historical Resources Element • Circulation Element • Recreation Element • Arts and Cultural Element • Natural Resources Element • Safety Element • Noise Element Each element discusses specific goals and policies to maintain the natural and built environments within the City. Since its adoption, sections of the General Plan have been updated including the 2008 Safety Element and the 2014-2021 Housing Element Update. The proposed Project is located within the City of Newport Beach and would be subject to the general plans' goals, policies, and guidelines to maintain the City's long-term vision. Coastal Land Use Plan (Adopted on July 26, 2016) The Coastal Land Use Plan was prepared in accordance with the California Coastal Act of 1976. The plan sets for the objectives and policies of land and water use within the coastal zone of the City of Newport Beach. The proposed Project is located within the coastal zone of the City of Newport Beach and would be subject to the guidelines and policies under the plan. Local Coastal Implementation Plan (Approved on November 22, 2016). The Local Coastal Implementation Plan is also available at the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code website which is updated as of 2019. The Local Coastal Implementation Plan is the primary tool used by the City of Newport Beach to carry out the objectives and policies of the Coastal Land Use Plan and ensure activities and other proposed development are consistent with the Coastal Land Use Plan. The proposed Project is located within the coastal zone of the City of Newport Beach and would be subject to the guidelines and policies in the Coastal Land Use Plan. City of Newport Beach Municipal Code (Approved on April 23, 2019) The City of Newport Beach Municipal Code covers all aspects of regulations including zoning, vehicle requirements, planning and zoning, local coastal program implementation, ordinance listing, and other development related requirements. Approved on October 26, 2010, the purpose of the Zoning Code is to carry out the policies identified in the City of Newport Beach General Plan. The Zoning Code also promotes the development of the City, protection of public health, safety, peace, comfort and general welfare. It provides guidance in the protection of the character, social, and economic vitality of the neighborhoods. Chambers Group, Inc. 5 21169 21-43 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California The proposed Project is located within the City of Newport Beach and would be required to comply with the objectives and policies relating to construction land uses, and development within the City of Newport Beach. 1.5 LOCATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS The proposed Project is located within the City of Newport Beach and is located approximately 1,000 feet from the coastline (Figure 2-1). Due to the proximity to the coast, the area receives a significant amount of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Sunset Ridge Park, constructed in December 2014, is a 13.7 -acre active park with a baseball field and two soccer fields. Visitors to Sunset Ridge Park use the existing parking lot across Superior Avenue and cross at the at -grade Superior Avenue/West Coast Highway intersection because no on-site parking is provided at Sunset Ridge Park. Currently, an existing City -owned parking lot with 64 metered parking stalls is located at the northeast corner of this intersection. The existing Superior Parking Lot is approximately 0.64 acres, with the driveway to the parking lot at approximately 0.17 acres. Access to the existing parking lot is available via an entrance off Superior Avenue for vehicles, and via a concrete pathway from the intersection of Superior Avenue and Coast Highway for pedestrians and bicyclists. Directly east of the existing parking lot is an undeveloped piece of land with steep slopes with ground elevations ranging from approximately 10 feet near West Coast Highway to approximately 75 feet near Sunset View Park based on the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88), with some existing vegetation. Properties and land uses adjacent to the Project site include Sunset Ridge Park, Sunset View Park, Villa Balboa and Newport Crest residential communities, and the lower campus of Hoag Hospital. A shopping center and the Lido Sands residential community are located to the south across West Coast Highway from the Project site. The entire Project site is within the boundary of the coastal zone as established by the California Coastal Act and is therefore under the land use planning and regulatory jurisdiction not only of local government agencies but also the California Coastal Commission (Commission). The City of Newport Beach Local Coastal Program includes a Coastal Land Use Plan and Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan (City of Newport Beach 2017a, City of Newport Beach 2017b). The Coastal Land Use Plan sets the goals, objectives, and policies that administers uses of the land and water within its sphere of influence (excluding Newport Coast and Banning Ranch). The Coastal Land Use Plan is divided in subsections for land use and development, public access and recreation, and coastal resource protection (City of Newport Beach 2017a). The purpose of the Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan is to implement policies of the California Coastal Act to protect, maintain, enhance, and restore the coastal zone environment. Site development must be consistent with the requirements of the Local Coastal Program and Coastal Act. 1.6 PROJECT PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue are major arterials with a high volume of vehicular traffic. The purpose of the bridge is to improve safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park and to improve the vehicular efficiency of the Superior Avenue/West Coast Highway intersection. Specifically, the objectives of the Project are: • To improve safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. • To provide additional parking spaces to better serve both passive uses and organized sporting events (mostly youth) at Sunset Ridge Park in an area where parking is limited. Chambers Group, Inc. 6 21169 21-44 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California • To reduce traffic signal wait times by shifting pedestrian and bicycle traffic from the at -grade crosswalk to the bridge. • To expand recreational options in this part of the City by developing a small dog park just below Sunset View Park, adjacent to the expanded parking lot. 1.7 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City proposes the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue, a new larger parking lot and a fenced dog park approximately 3.4 acres in size. Individual Project components are outlined below. 1.7.1 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge The Steel Truss bridge option would span Superior Avenue and would be approximately 240 feet long, approximately 12 to 16 feet wide, and 16 feet tall. The bottom of the bridge's superstructure would be approximately 17 to 25 feet above the asphalt surface. The Steel Truss bridge would have steel members across the top of the bridge. This bridge option will be a single span bridge with steel piles to support the superstructure. The Concrete Cast -in -Place bridge option would span Superior Avenue and would be approximately 280 feet long, approximately 12 to 16 feet wide, and 8 feet tall. The bottom of the bridge's superstructure would be approximately 17 to 25 feet above the asphalt surface. The Concrete Cast -in -Place bridge would be open and not include any ceiling or roof. This bridge option will be a 3 -span structure with deep concrete foundations to structurally support the superstructure. Minimal lighting would be provided along the bridge for safety and security. The security lighting would be down -shielded to prevent light scatter. A new staircase will provide access to the parking lot and bridge from the north side of West Coast Highway. Additionally, the proposed Project would include the construction of a new sidewalk/bike path from the modified parking lot entrance to the proposed bridge. Access to the bridge from Sunset Ridge Park will be from the southeastern edge of the park, adjacent to the intersection of the path from Superior Avenue to the park and the bike/pedestrian path surrounding the park. The bridge access from the Sunset Ridge Park side will be approximately 145 feet from the intersection of Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. Due to the installation of the bridge, the location of the traffic signal at the intersection of West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue will need to be moved in orderto provide proper height and visibility. The proposed bridge would help facilitate movement of pedestrians and bicyclists across Superior Avenue. The bridge is being designed to be mindful of view lines and the potential for visual obstruction. The two options being considered for the bridge design include either a steel truss bridge or a concrete cast -in- place bridge as shown in the images below. Chambers Group, Inc. 7 21169 21-45 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California Steel Truss Bridge Concept (Single Span) Concrete Cast -in -Place Bridge Concept (3 -Span) 1.7.2 Superior Parkine Lot The proposed bridge would connect Sunset Ridge Park to a new, larger asphalt parking lot with a range of 100 to 128 parking spaces approximately 3.4 acres in size. The total area of impervious surface will include the parking lot and sidewalks, which totals approximately 65,000 square feet. Minimal additional security lighting would be provided within the parking lot for safety purposes. The security lighting would be down - shielded to prevent light scatter. Drought tolerant landscaping will be provided, and new trees will be planted. The parking lot will be operated in the same manner as the existing parking lot with paid metered parking spaces from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.; and the parking lot would remain open for 24 hours per day. The construction of the proposed parking lot will require demolition of the existing parking lot and significant grading and earthwork. Excavation would be greatest (up to 27 feet) at the east side of the Project site. The construction of the new parking lot would also require installation of several retaining walls with a height of up to 25 feet on the southern border of the Project site along West Coast Highway. The existing Project site is on a relatively steep slope with ground elevations ranging from approximately 10 feet by West Coast Highway to approximately 75 feet by Sunset View Park per NVAD 88. Construction of the parking lot may include a bicycle node (fix -it station) and a drinking water fountain. Optional Road Extension to Adjacent Property The City is currently working with the adjacent land owner (Hoag Memorial Hospital) to determine the feasibility of extending an access road through the redeveloped parking lot to connect to the lower campus of Hoag Memorial Hospital. If this option is to be exercised, the entrance from Superior Avenue will be extended to connect with the existing parking lot within Hoag Memorial Hospital. Chambers Group, Inc. 3 21169 21-46 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California 1.7.3 Dog Park Construction of the proposed Project would also include the installation of a fenced dog park with 6 -foot tall fences, separating large and small dogs, which may include benches and trash cans. The dog park will be 0.2 to 0.3 acres in size. The dog park would require a new water service for the water fountain and for irrigation. Security lighting at the dog park would be down -shielded to prevent light scatter. Hours at the dog park would be consistent with the Municipal Code which restricts park hours to between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. In addition, a shade structure may be installed at the dog park, approximately 10 to 15 feet in height. The top of the shade structure would be below the Sunset View Park ground elevation and would be designed to protect public coastal views. 1.7.4 Construction Construction of the proposed Project is scheduled to begin in early 2021 and reach completion in approximately 14 to 18 months. Since existing recreational activities occur at Sunset Ridge Park (soccer in the Fall and baseball in the Spring), construction activities would be scheduled during low usage months to avoid recreational events, or these events could be relocated to an alternate location temporarily if alternate/temporary parking cannot be allowed closer to the park. The work will occur predominantly during daytime work hours (7:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.); however, occasional nighttime work may be required depending on bridge design to minimize public inconvenience and provide public safety. If the City decides to proceed with the steel truss bridge option, it is anticipated that Superior Avenue would be closed at night to accommodate the installation of the proposed bridge superstructure. For nights where street closures would occur, alternate traffic routes and detour signage would be posted so as not to interfere with the public's access to the beach per Section 21101 of the Vehicle Code and Section 21.44.055 Temporary Street Closures of the Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan (City of Newport Beach 2107b). In addition, depending on the bridge design, temporary re -striping of Superior Avenue may need to occur to construct the bridge supports. Construction equipment would include a grader, excavator, dozer, loader, crane, pile driver or drilling rig, grinder, dump trucks, rollers, and asphalt paving machine. Construction staging for the proposed Project would occur within the existing parking lot. After construction of the proposed Project, Superior Avenue may need pavement rehabilitation or restoration. Construction of the proposed Project may require intermittent sidewalk closures on Superior Avenue and the north side of West Coast Highway for the construction of bridge abutments, grading, and modifying the existing entrance to the new parking lot and landscaping. Construction will result in the excavation of excess soil, beyond what is required for fill purposes. This excess soil of approximately 20,000 to 25,000 cubic yards will be used to fill the need for soil in local projects and is expected to be transported to locations within a radius of approximately 50 miles. Any other construction debris would be disposed of by the construction contractor consistent with City disposal requirements and those of the receiving site. 1.8 REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS A public agency, other than the Lead Agency, that has discretionary approval power over a project is referred to under the CEQ4 Guidelines as a "Responsible Agency." Reviewing Agencies include those agencies that do not have discretionary powers but may review the IS/MND for adequacy and accuracy. Potential Reviewing Agencies and Responsible Agencies include the following: Chambers Group, Inc. 9 21169 21-47 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Responsible Agencies State of California • California Coastal Commission —Coastal Development Permit Amendment 0 Caltrans — NEPA document lead agency Local City of Newport Beach— CEQA document Lead Agency Coastal Development Permit, Grading and Building Permits Chambers Group, Inc. � �10 21169 21-48 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, Colifornio SECTION 2.0—FINDINGS An Initial Study has been prepared to assess the Proposed Project's potential impacts on the environment and the significance of those impacts and was incorporated in the Draft MND. Based on this Initial Study, it has been determined that the Proposed Project would not have any significant impacts on the environment once all proposed mitigation measures have been implemented. This conclusion is supported by the following findings: ■ No potential was found for adverse impacts on agriculture and forestry resources, land use and planning, mineral resources, recreation, wildfire threats associated with the Proposed Project. ■ Potential adverse impacts resulting from the Proposed Project were found to be less than significant in the following areas: aesthetics, air quality, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, noise, population and housing, public services, transportation, utilities and service systems, ■ Full implementation of the proposed mitigation measures included in this MND would reduce potential project -related adverse impact on biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, and tribal cultural resources to a less than significant level. Chambers Group, Inc. 11 21169 21-49 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California SECTION 3.0 — MITIGATION MEASURES The following mitigation measures and project conditions have been incorporated into the scope of work for the Proposed Project and will be fully implemented by the District to avoid or minimize adverse environmental impacts identified in this MND. These mitigation measures will be included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) prepared for this project. MM BIO -1: Project -related activities likely to have the potential to disturb suitable bird nesting habitat shall be prohibited from February 15 through August 31, unless a Project Biologist acceptable to the City of Newport Beach surveys the Project area prior to disturbance to confirm the absence of active nests. Disturbance shall be defined as any activity that physically removes and/or damages vegetation or habitat or any action that may cause disruption of nesting behavior such as loud noise from equipment and/or artificial night lighting. Surveys shall be conducted weekly, beginning no earlier than 30 days and ending no later than 3 days prior to the commencement of disturbance. If an active nest is discovered, disturbance within a particular buffer shall be prohibited until nesting is complete; the buffer distance shall be determined by the Biologist in consideration of species sensitivity and existing nest site conditions. Limits of avoidance shall be demarcated with flagging or fencing. The Biologist shall record the results of the recommended protective measures described above and shall submit a memo summarizing any nest avoidance measures to the City of Newport Beach to document compliance with applicable State and federal laws pertaining to the protection of native birds. Similarly, for preserved vegetation that occurs within 50 to 100 feet of construction activities, if construction is occurring during the nesting season, preserved vegetation shall be surveyed for the presence of nesting birds. MM BIO -2: Flag or install construction fencing or silt fencing along the proposed Project boundaries to delineate construction limits and to prevent encroachment into adjacent natural communities. The limits of both the Superior and West Coast Highway wetlands will be clearly demarcated in the field and all on- site construction personnel will be informed about the wetland avoidance area prior to the commencement of construction activities. The construction contractor will install a solid protective barrierthat is clearlyvisible to construction personnel, particularly any construction equipment operators, and that prevents any incidental discharge of soil or debris into the jurisdictional wetlands. Furthermore, a biologist will monitor the construction work to ensure that encroachment into the wetlands does not occur. MM BIO -3: Gravel bags should be placed along the tops of the v -ditches in order to minimize erosion and to prevent construction debris and potentially hazardous materials from entering the waterway during a rain event. MM BIO -4: Artemisia californica-Eriogonum fasciculatum Shrubland located within the proposed Project footprint should be avoided to the greatest extent feasible. Artemisia californica-Eriogonum fasciculatum Shrubland located within the proposed Project footprint, that may be avoided, shall be flagged or construction or silt fencing should be installed along the avoidable vegetation to delineate construction limits and to prevent encroachment into adjacent natural communities. Any impacts to Artemisia californica-Eriogonum fasciculatum Shrubland which cannot be avoided will be mitigated through one of the following, in order of priority: o Onsite Mitigation: Any temporary impacts to CSS will be revegetated within the Sunset Ridge planted area, in areas that are not currently vegetated. Specifically, there is an Chambers Group, Inc. 21169 12 21-50 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California opportunity for revegetation in an area outside of the delineated wetlands that, with approval from the Commission, could provide additive benefits to the Sunset Ridge Park planted area, immediately to the northeast of the Project site. This will provide a continuation of the CSS habitat previously revegetated onsite. The City will replant the area to be equivalent to existing conditions, which consists of superior high-quality native vegetation with coverage of primarily CSS. If this area is not approved for revegetation by the Commission, alternative onsite mitigation opportunities will be evaluated. o Offsite Mitigation: Additive habitat assessment in the area adjacent to the project site within the replanted CSS would be provided to mitigate impacts from direct disturbance from the bridge structure and potential impacts from shading. MM BI0-5: Following completion of the construction activities, the City will conduct monthly monitoring of the West Coast Highway wetlands to evaluate and document the associated conditions to determine if any unforeseen impacts from the proposed construction activities are occurring. This monthly monitoring will continue for up to one year, or until such time as it can be sufficiently demonstrated that the wetlands will continue to persist in perpetuity. If it is determined during post -construction monitoring that construction has resulted in an unexpected impact to the wetlands, appropriate remedial actions will be implemented by the City. For instance, an unforeseen disruption or obstruction of subsurface hydrology to the wetlands may warrant the City's provision of an alternative water source that would continue to supply sufficient water to sustain the wetlands. MM CUL -1: If archaeological or paleontological resources are discovered during construction, all construction activities in the general area of the discovery shall be temporarily halted until the resource is examined by a qualified monitor, retained by the Developer. The monitor shall recommend next steps (i.e., additional excavation, curation, preservation, etc.). Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. MM CUL -2: During proposed Project construction, activities will be halted, and an archaeologist must be available to evaluate the find. If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the County Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. MM PALEO-1: All project -related ground disturbance that could potential impact the Monterey Formation and the Old Paralic Deposits will be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor on a full-time basis, as these geologic units are determined to have a high paleontological sensitivity. Project -related excavations that occur in surficial younger alluvial deposits (not mapped in the current study area but existing in the vicinity) will be monitored on a part-time basis to ensure that underlying paleontologically sensitive sediments are not being impacted. Excavations exceeding 5 feet in depth in Quaternary alluvium will be monitored on a full-time basis. Chambers Group, Inc. 13 21169 21-51 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Cot Project Newport Beach, California MM PALEO-2: A qualified paleontologist will be retained to supervise monitoring of construction excavations and to produce a Paleontological Monitoring and Mitigation Plan for the proposed project. Paleontological resource monitoring will include inspection of exposed rock units during active excavations within sensitive geologic sediments. The monitor will have authority to temporarily divert grading away from exposed fossils and halt construction activities in the immediate vicinity in order to professionally and efficiently recover the fossil specimens and collect associated data. The qualified paleontologist will prepare progress reports to be filed with the lead agency. MM PALEO-3: At each fossil locality, field data forms will be used to record pertinent geologic data, stratigraphic sections will be measured, and appropriate sediment samples will be collected and submitted for analysis. MM PALEO-4: Matrix sampling would be conducted to test for the presence of microfossils. Testing for microfossils would consist of screen -washing small samples (approximately 200 pounds) to determine if significant fossils are present. If microfossils are present, additional matrix samples will be collected (up to a maximum of 6,000 pounds per locality to ensure recovery of a scientifically significant microfossil sample). MM PALED -5: Recovered fossils will be prepared to the point of curation, identified by qualified experts, listed in a database to facilitate analysis, and reposited in a designated paleontological curation facility. The most likely repository is the SDNHM. MM HAZ-1: Any contaminated soils or other hazardous materials removed from the proposed Project site shall be transported only by a Licensed Hazardous Waste Hauler who shall be in compliance with all applicable State and federal requirements, including U.S. Department of Transportation regulations under Title 49 of the CFR (Hazardous Materials Transportation Act), California Department of Transportation standards, Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 United States Code §6901 et seq.). The City of Newport Beach Public Works and Community Development Departments shall verify that only Licensed Haulers who are operating in compliance with regulatory requirements are used to haul hazardous materials. MM TCR -1: Prior to issuance of any grading permit, the Applicant shall provide satisfactory evidence that a Native American monitor (i.e., Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation), has been retained to observe ground disturbance activities during grading and excavation. In the event that tribal cultural resources are discovered, the Native American monitor shall be included in the consultation on the recommended next steps. Chambers Group, Inc. 14 21169 21-52 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California SECTION 4.0 — CIRCULATION On September 23, 2019, the City of Newport Beach circulated a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study to responsible agencies, trustee agencies, interest groups, and the general public. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 21091 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, a 30 -day public review period for the Final IS/MND was provided from September 23, 2019 to October 23, 2019. Copies of the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and supporting materials were made available for review online at http://www.newportbeachca.gov/index.aspx?page=1347 and at the following City public facilities during regular business hours: Newport Beach City Hall Community Development Department 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach Public Library Central Library 1000 Avocado Avenue Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach Public Library Balboa Branch 100 East Balboa Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach Public Library Mariners Branch 1300 Irvine Avenue Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach Library Corona Del Mar Branch 410 Marigold Avenue Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 Chambers Group, Inc. �15 21169 21-53 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California SECTION 5.0 — COMMENTS AND RESPONSES 5.1 CEQA REQUIREMENTS REGARDING COMMENTS AND RESPONSES CEQA Guidelines Section 15204 (b) outlines parameters forsubmitting comments and reminds persons and public agencies that the focus of review and comment of negative declarations should be, "on the proposed finding that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. If persons and public agencies believe that the project may have a significant effect, they should: (1) Identify the specific effect; (2) Explain why they believe the effect would occur, and, (3) Explain why they believe the effect would be significant." CEQA Guidelines Section 15204 (c) further advises, "Reviewers should explain the basis for their comments, and should submit data or references offering facts, reasonable assumptions based on facts, or expert opinion supported by facts in support of the comments. Pursuant to Section 15064, an effect shall not be considered significant in the absence of substantial evidence." Section 15204 (d) also states, "Each responsible agency and trustee agency shall focus its comments on environmental information germane to that agency's statutory responsibility. 'Section 15204 (e) states, "This section shall not be used to restrict the ability of reviewers to comment on the general adequacy of a document or of the lead agency to reject comments not focused as recommended by this section." In accordance with Public Resources Code 21092.5 (b) of the CEQA Guidelines, the lead agency shall notify any public agency which comments on a negative declaration of the public hearing or hearings, if any, on the project for which the negative declaration was prepared. If notice to the commenting public agency is provided pursuant to Section 21092, the notice shall satisfy the requirement of this subdivision. 5.2 COMMENTS AND RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE DRAFT IS/MND This section provides responses to written comments received during the 30 -day public review period. Table 1: Commenting Individuals and Agencies 1 Jack Rose September 23, 2019 2 Jack Rose September 24, 2019 3 Michael Call, Mark Wilser, Deborah Gero September 25, 2019 4 REO Nationwide September 25, 2019 5 REO Nationwide September 25, 2019 6 REO Nationwide September 25, 2019 7 David Tanner September 26, 2019 8 Sandy Frizzell September 26, 2019 9 Surish Parikh October 1, 2019 10 Tinnelly Law Group (Villa Balboa Attorney) October 1, 2019 11 Michael Call, Mark Wilser, Deborah Gero October 2, 2019 12 Mali Satchi October 4, 2019 13 REO Nationwide October 5, 2019 14 Sandv Frizzell I October 5, 2019 Chambers Group, Inc. 21169 is 21-54 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California 15 Wendy Kaiser October 14, 2019 16 Sudhir Banker October 15, 2019 17 Ryan Darby October 18, 2019 18 Ryan Darby October 18, 2019 19 Sudhir Banker October 18, 2019 20 City of Irvine October 21, 2019 21 Barry Macpherson October 22, 2019 22 Deborah Gero October 22, 2019 23 California Department of Fish & Wildlife October 22, 2019 24 California Department of Transportation October 22, 2019 25 Michael Call October 22, 2019 26 Sandy Frizzell October 22, 2019 27 Doug Tamkin October 23, 2019 Chambers Group, Inc. � _ 17 21169 21-55 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #1— Jack Rose COMMENT LETTER#1 From: lack <vankeeljack@sbcgloba].net> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 8:06 PM To: Tran, Andy Subject: Fwd: City of Newport Beach: Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration Hi MrTran Would this include a bridge over PCH? Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: T Comment 1-1 From: City of Newport Beach News <nore1lyAnewportbeachca.gov> Date: September 23, 2019 at 5:27:31 PM PDT To: <yankeeljacknsbcglobal.net> Subject: City of Newport Beach: Notice ofAvailability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Reply -To: <noreplygnewportbeachca.gov> Notice ofAvailability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration SuperiorAvenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project (PA2019-014) Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Post Date: 09/23/2019 5:00 pm News Splash y Planning Division News Splash: NOTICE OFAVAILABILITYAND INTENTTO ADOPTA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE SUPERIORAVENUE PEDESTRIANAND BICYCLE BRIDGE AND PARKING LOT PROJECT (PA201-9-014} Chambers Group, Inc. 18 21169 21-56 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Notice is hereby given that the City of Newport Beach (Lead Agency) has completed an Initial Study and intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project, prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the CEQAGuidelines. Project Title: Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Proj ect Project Applicant: City of Newport Beach Project Location: The proposed Project is located within the City of Newport Beach and is located approximately 1,000 feet from the coastline in Orange County, California. The entire Project site is within the boundary of the coastal zone as established by the California Coastal Act. Currently, an existing City -owned parking lot with 64 metered parking stalls is located at the northeast corner of this intersection. Directly east of the existing parking lot is an undeveloped piece of land with steep slopes. The Project site is surrounded by the Pacific Ocean, Sunset View Park, Sunset Ridge Park, vegetated hillsides, major roads, and residential homes. Superior Avenue runs along the western boundary and the West Coast Highway runs along the southern boundaries of the Project site, respectively. Project Description: The City proposes the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue, a new larger parking lot and a fenced dog park totaling approximately 3.4 acres in size. Due to the proximity to the coast, the area receives a significant amount of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Sunset Ridge Park, constructed in December 2014, is a 13.7 -acre active park with a baseball field and two soccer fields. Currently, visitors to Sunset Ridge Park use the existing parking lot across Superior Avenue and cross at the at -grade Superior Avenue/West Coast Highway intersection because no on-site parking is provided at Sunset Ridge Park. The new pedestrian and bicycle ramp will provide access to the parking lot and bridge from the north side of West Coast Highway. Additionally, the proposed Project would include the construction of a new sidewalkibike path from the modified parking lot entrance to the proposed bridge. The proposed bridge would help facilitate movement of pedestrians and bicyclists across Superior Avenue. The proposed bridge would connect Sunset Ridge Park to a new, larger asphalt parking lot with a range of 100 to 128 parking spaces. Construction of the proposed Project would also include the installation of a fenced, dog park, separating large and small dogs, which may include benches and trash cans. The dog park will be 0.2 to 0.3 acres in size. The dog park would require a new water service for the water fountain and for irrigation. Security lighting at the dog park would be down -shielded to prevent light scatter. Hours at the dog park would be consistent with the Municipal Code which restricts park hours to between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. In addition, a shade structure may be installed at the dog park, approximately 10 to 15 feet in height. The top of the shade structure would Chambers Group, Inc. 19 21169 21-57 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California be below the Sunset View Park ground elevation and would be designed to protect public coastal views. Development of the proposed project would require the following approvals from the City of Newport Beach: • Coastal Development Permit (CDP) — To allow development of the project including the parking lot, dog park, and pedestrian/bicycle bridge in the Coastal Zone. • Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) — To address reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the legislative and project specific discretionary approvals pursuant to CEQA. Development of the proposed project would require the following approval from the California Coastal Commission: • Coastal Development Permit Amendment — To amend the Sunset Ridge Park Coastal Development Permit No. 5-11-302 to allow the bridge development at the existing park. On the basis of the Initial Study, City staff has concluded that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment and has therefore recommended preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (WsID). The Mitigated Negative Declaration is based on the finding that, by implementing the identified mitigation measures, the project's potential significant adverse impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level. The Initial Study is available for a 30 -day public review period beginning September 20, 2019, and ending October 21, 2019. Copies of the document are available for review in the Newport Beach Community Development Department, 100 Civic Center Drive, Bay B, Newport Beach, CA 92660 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on Friday. The document is available online: www.newportbeachca. og v/cega. Additionally, copies of the document are also available for review at the following City public libraries during regular business hours: *Newport Beach Public Library, Central Library, 1000 Avocado Avenue, Newport Beach, CA92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Balboa Branch, 100 East Balboa Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Mariners Branch, 1300 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Corona Del Mar Branch, 410 Marigold Avenue, Corona, Del_Max,-CA.92625 . Chambers Group, Inc. 21169 20 21-58 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #1— Jack Rose Response to Comment 1-1: Thank you for your comment. As described in Section 2.3 of the Draft IS/MND, the proposed Project includes the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue that would connect Sunset Ridge Park to the Superior Parking Lot at the intersection of West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. This Project does not include a bridge over Pacific Coast Highway. Chambers Group, Inc.j pR 21 21169 21-59 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #2 —Jack Rose COMMENT LETTER#2 From: Jack <vankeeliack@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 8:31AM To: Tran, Andy Subject: Re: City of Newport Beach: Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Is there a space, engineering or financial constraint to doing bridge over PCH? Also, besides Comment improved pedestrian safety it would be an awesome view walking/riding over the "Andy Tran" 2-I Bridge to go to beach. Comment 2-2 Jack Rose Newport Crest Homeowner Ebb Tide Homeower Sent from my iPhone On Sep 24, 2019, at 7:50 AM, Tran, Andy <ATran(a_newportbeachca gov> wrote: Good morninglack, No, this project does not include the bridge over PCH. It only includes the pedestrian/bicycle bridge over Superior Ave, a new larger parking lot and a dogpark. Thanks, Andy Tran, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: 949-644-3315 From: Jack <vankeeliack@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 8:06 PM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Fwd: City of Newport Beach: Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Hi Mr Tran Chambers Group, Inc. 21169 22 21-60 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Would this include a bridge over PCH? Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: City of Newport Beach News <noreplygnewportbeachca.gov> Date: September 23, 2019 at 5:27:31 PM PDT To: <yankeeljack@sbcglobal.net> Subject: City of Newport Beach: Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated NegativeDeclaration Reply -To: <noreplyna,newportbeachca.gov> Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration SuperiorAvenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project (PA2019-014) Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Post Date: 09/23/2019 5:00 pm er�vs Planning Division News Splash: NOTICE OFAVAILABILITYAND INTENT TO ADOPTA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE SUPERIORAVENUE PEDESTRIANAND BICYCLE BRIDGE AND PARKING LOTPROJECT (PA2019-014) Notice is hereby given that the City of Newport Beach (Lead Agency) has completed an Initial Study and intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project, prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the CEQA Guidelines. I Comment 2-3 Chambers Group, Inc. 23 21169 21-61 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Project Title: Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Project Applicant: City of Newport Beach Project Location: The proposed Project is located within the City of Newport Beach and is located approximately 1,000 feet from the coastline in Orange County, California. The entire Project site is within the boundary of the coastal zone as established by the California Coastal Act. Currently, an existing City -owned parking lot with 64 metered parking stalls is located at the northeast corner of this intersection. Directly east of the existing parking lot is an undeveloped piece of land with steep slopes. The Project site is surrounded by the Pacific Ocean, Sunset View Park, Sunset Ridge Park, vegetated hillsides, major roads, and residential homes. Superior Avenue runs along the western boundary and the West Coast Highway runs along the southern boundaries of the Project site, respectively. Project Description: The City proposes the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue, a new larger parking lot and a fenced dog park totaling approximately 3.4 acres in size. Due to the proximity to the coast, the area receives a significant amount of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Sunset Ridge Park, constructed in December 2014, is a 13.7 -acre active park with a baseball field and two soccer fields. Currently, visitors to Sunset Ridge Park use the existing parking lot across Superior Avenue and cross at the at -grade Superior Avenue/West Coast Highway intersection because no on-site parking is provided at Sunset Ridge Park. The new pedestrian and bicycle ramp will provide access to the parking lot and bridge from the north side of West Coast Highway. Additionally, the proposed Project would include the construction of a new sidewalkibike path from the modified parking lot entrance to the proposed bridge. The proposed bridge would help facilitate movement of pedestrians and bicyclists across Superior Avenue. The proposed bridge would connect Sunset Ridge Park to a new, larger asphalt parking lot with a range of 100 to 128 parking spaces. Construction of the proposed Project would also include the installation of a fenced dog park, separating large and small dogs, which may include benches and trash cans. The dog park will be 0.2 to 0.3 acres in size. The dog park would require a new water service for the water fountain and for irrigation. Security lighting at the dog park would be down -shielded to prevent light scatter. Hours at the dog park would be consistent with the Municipal Code which restricts park hours to between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. In addition, a shade structure may be installed at the dog park, approximately 10 Chambers Group, Inc. 21169 24 21-62 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California to 15 feet in height. The top of the shade structure would be below the Sunset View Park ground elevation and would be designed to protect public coastal views. Development of the proposed project would require the following approvals from the City of Newport Beach: • Coastal Development Permit (CDP) — To allow development of the project including the parking lot, dog park, and pedestrian/bicycle bridge in the Coastal Zone. • Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) — To address reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the legislative and project specific discretionary approvals pursuant to CEQA. Development of the proposed project would require the following approval from the California Coastal Commission: • Coastal Development Permit Amendment — To amend the Sunset Ridge Park Coastal Development Permit No. 5- 11-302 to allow the bridge development at the existing park. On the basis of the Initial Study, City staff has concluded that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment and has therefore recommended preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The Mitigated Negative Declaration is based on the finding that, by implementing the identified mitigation measures, the project's potential significant adverse impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level. The Initial Study is available for a 30 -day public review period beginning September 20, 2019, and ending October 21, 2019. Copies of the document are available for review in the Newport Beach Community Development Department, 100 Civic Center Drive, Bay B, Newport Beach, CA 92660 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on Friday. The document is available online: www.newportbeachca.gov/cega. Additionally, copies of the document are also available for review at the following City public libraries during regular business hours: *Newport Beach Public Library, Central Library, 1000 Avocado Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Balboa Branch, 100 East Balboa Chambers Group, Inc. 21169 25 21-63 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Mariners Branch, 1300 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Corona Del Mar Branch, 410 Marigold Avenue, Corona Del Mar, CA92625 Written comments on the proposed project must be received no later than October 21, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. to the attention of Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer, at the address listed below or via email. Your comments should specifically identify what environmental impacts you believe would result from the project, why they are significant, and what changes or mitigation measures you believe should be adopted to eliminate or reduce these impacts. There is no fee to submit comments. You are also invited to attend and testify at the public hearings as to the appropriateness of this document. The Newport Beach City Council will hold a hearing on the project at a future date in the City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. An additional public hearing notice will be sent out prior to the City Council's consideration of the project. For further information as to the future schedule of hearings, please check: haps://www.newportbeachea. gov/govemment/dgpartments/yublic- works/superior-avenue-pedestrian-and-bicycle-bridge-and-parking= lot-proiect. For additional information, please contact Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer, at (949) 644-3315 or at atran(c pMortbeachca.gov. Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach, Public Works Department 100 Civic Center Drive, Bay D-2 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Please note: This is an automated message from the City of Newport Beach. Subscription preferences may be changed by accessing your News & Alerts account from the City website. Having trouble viewing this email? View on the website instead. Chambers Group, Inc. 26 21169 21-64 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #2 — Jack Rose Response to Comment 2-1: Thank you for your comment. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.2 Project Purpose and Objectives, West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue are major arterials with a high volume of vehicular traffic. The purpose of the bridge is to improve safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park and to improve the vehicular efficiency of the Superior Avenue/West Coast Highway intersection. Specifically, the objectives of the Project are: • To improve safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. • To provide additional parking spaces to better serve both passive uses and organized sporting events (mostly youth) at Sunset Ridge Park in an area where parking is limited. • To reduce traffic signal wait times by shifting pedestrian and bicycle traffic from the at -grade crosswalk to the bridge. • To expand recreational options in this part of the City by developing a small dog park just below Sunset View Park, adjacent to the expanded parking lot. The provision of a bridge over PCH is outside the scope of this Project; however, your comment will be considered by City Council during their review of the Project and CEQA document. Response to Comment 2-2: Please refer to Response to Comment 2-1. Response to Comment 2-3: Please refer to Response to Comment 1-1. Chambers Group, Inc. 27 21169 21-65 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter#3 —Michael Call, Mark Wilser, Deborah Gero COMMENT LETTER#3 From: Tran, Andy Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 7:42 AM To: 'Michael Call' Cc: 'Mark Wilser';'Deborah Gero' Subject: RE: What is the MND public review period? How do we makeour comments know to the decision makes? Good m orni ng everyone, The MND public review period is an opportunity for the public to comment on the environmental documentthat was prepared for this project. MND's include manytechnical studies and mitigation measures to address potential impacts. These technical studies include noise and visual impacts to name a few. Feel free to send me your written commentsvia email or letter. We will provide a formal response at the end of the 30 -day reviewperiod. Thanks, Andy Tran, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: 949-644-3315 From: Michael Call <onecall4alll@verizon.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 5:13 PM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Cc:'Mark Wilser'<mw@globalcapitalmarkets.com>;'Deborah Gero'<debigero@gmail.com> Subject: What is the MND public review period? How do we make our comments know to the decision makes? Andy, Comment What is the MND public review period? 3-1 How do we make our comments know to the decision makes? Comment Thankyou, Michael Call 3-2 From: Tran, Andy[mailto:ATran@newportbeachca.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 11:16 AM Subject: FW: City of Newport Beach: UPDATED - Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Chambers Group, Inc. 21169 28 21-66 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Would this include a bridge over PCH? Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: City of Newport Beach News <norglly&ewportbeachca. gov> Date: September 23, 2019 at 5:27:31 PM PDT To: < ankeeIjack@sbcglobal.net> Subject: City of Newport Beach: Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated NegativeDeclaration Reply -To: <noreply@newportbeachca.gov> Notice ofAvailability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration SuperiorAvenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project (PA2019-014) Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking LotProject Post Date: 09/23/2019 5:00 pm News Splasl� 10 t a Planning Division News Splash: NOTICE OFAVAILABILITYAND INTENT TOADOPTA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE SUPERIORAVENUE PEDESTRIANAND BICYCLE BRIDGE AND PARKING LOTPROJECT (PA2019-014) Notice is hereby given that the City of Newport Beach (Lead Agency) has completed an Initial Study and intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project, prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the CEQA Guidelines. IComment 3-3 Chambers Group, Inc. 29 21169 21-67 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, Californio _...................._.................... .......... ...... _....... _..._........._._..............._._._......._......_. Project Title: Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Project Applicant: City of Newport Beach Project Location: The proposed Project is located within the City of Newport Beach and is located approximately 1,000 feet from the coastline in Orange County, California. The entire Project site is within the boundary of the coastal zone as established by the California Coastal Act. Currently, an existing City -owned parking lot with 64 metered parking stalls is located at the northeast comer of this intersection. Directly east of the existing parking lot is an undeveloped piece of land with steep slopes. The Project site is surrounded by the Pacific Ocean, Sunset View Park, Sunset Ridge Park, vegetated hillsides, major roads, and residential homes. Superior Avenue runs along the western boundary and the West Coast Highway runs along the southern boundaries of the Project site, respectively. Project Description: The City proposes the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue, a new larger parking lot and a fenced dog park totaling approximately 3.4 acres in size. Due to the proximity to the coast, the area receives a significant amount of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Sunset Ridge Park, constructed in December 2014, is a 13.7 -acre active park with a baseball field and two soccer fields. Currently, visitors to Sunset Ridge Park use the existing parking lot across Superior Avenue and cross at the at -grade Superior Avenue/West Coast Highway intersection because no on-site parking is provided at Sunset Ridge Park. The new pedestrian and bicycle ramp will provide access to the parking lot and bridge from the north side of West Coast Highway. Additionally, the proposed Project would include the construction of a new sidewalk/bike path from the modified parking lot entrance to the proposed bridge. The proposed bridge would help facilitate movement of pedestrians and bicyclists across Superior Avenue. The proposed bridge would connect Sunset Ridge Park to a new, larger asphalt parking lot with a range of 100 to 128 parking spaces. Construction of the proposed Project would also include the installation of a fenced dog park, separating large and small dogs, which may include benches and trash cans. The dog park will be 0.2 to 0.3 acres in size. The dog park would require a new water service for the water fountain and for irrigation. Security lighting at the dog park would be down -shielded to prevent light scatter. Hours at the dog park would be consistent with the Municipal Code which restricts park hours to between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. In addition, a shade structure may be installed at the dog park, approximately 10 Chambers Group, Inc. �30 21169 21-68 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Cot Project Newport Beach, California to 15 feet in height. The top of the shade structure would be below the Sunset View Park ground elevation and would be designed to protect public coastal views. Development of the proposed project would require the following approvals from the City of Newport Beach: • Coastal Development Permit (CDP) — To allow development of the project including the parking lot, dog park, and pedestrian/bicycle bridge in the Coastal Zone. • Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) — To address reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the legislative and project specific discretionary approvals pursuant to CEQA. Development of the proposed project would require the following approval from the California Coastal Commission: • Coastal Development Permit Amendment — To amend the Sunset Ridge Park Coastal Development Permit No. 5- 11-302 to allow the bridge development at the existing park. On the basis of the Initial Study, City staff has concluded that the i project would not have a significant impact on the environment and has therefore recommended preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The Mitigated Negative Declaration is based on the finding that, by implementing the identified mitigation measures, the project's potential significant adverse impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level. The Initial Study is available for a 30 -day public review period beginning September 20, 2019, and ending October 21, 2019. Copies of the document are available for review in the Newport Beach Community Development Department, 100 Civic Center Drive, Bay B, Newport Beach, CA 92660 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on Friday. The document is available online: www.nMortbeachea.gov/cega. Additionally, copies of the document are also available for review at the following City public libraries during regular business hours: *Newport Beach Public Library, Central Library, 1000 Avocado Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Balboa Branch, 100 East Balboa Chambers Group, Inc. 31 21169 21-69 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Mariners Branch, 1300 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Corona Del Mar Branch, 410 Marigold Avenue, Corona Del Mar, CA92625 Written comments on the proposed project must be received no later than October 21, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. to the attention of Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer, at the address listed below or via email. Your comments should specifically identify what environmental impacts you believe would result from the project, why they are significant, and what changes or mitigation measures you believe should be adopted to eliminate or reduce these impacts. There is no fee to submit comments. You are also invited to attend and testify at the public hearings as to the appropriateness of this document. i The Newport Beach City Council will hold a hearing on the project at a future date in the City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center j Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. An additional public hearing notice will be sent out prior to the City Council's consideration of the project. For further information as to the future schedule of hearings, please check: j https://www.newportbeachca.goy/aovemment/deparlments/public- works/superior-avenue-pedestrian-and-bicycle-bridge-and-parking- lot-prof ect. For additional information, please contact Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer, at (949) 644-3315 or at atran@`portbeachca.gov. Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach, Public Works Department 100 Civic Center Drive, Bay D-2 Newport Beach, CA92660 Please note: This is an automated message from the Ciy of Newport Beach. Subscription preferences may be changed by accessing your News & Alerts account from the City website. Having trouble viewing this email? View on the website instead. Chambers Group, Inc. 32 21169 21-70 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Change your eNotification preference. Unsubscribe from all City of Newport Beach eNotifications. Chambers Group, Inc. 33 21169 21-71 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #3 — Michael Call, Mark Wilser, Debora Gero Response to Comment 3-1: Thank you for your comment. The purpose of the public review period is to allow both agencies and the public to comment on the Draft MND focusing on the sufficiency of the document. in identifying and analyzing possible impacts on the environment and ways in which the significant effects may be avoided or mitigated (CEQA Guidelines Section 15204). On September 23, 2019, the City of Newport Beach circulated a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study to responsible agencies, trustee agencies, interest groups, and the general public. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 21091 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, a 30 -day public review period for the Final IS/MND was provided from September 23, 2019 to October 23, 2019. Response to Comment 3-2: Comments received during the public review period will be part of the public record. These comments will be considered by the City Council during their consideration of the Project. Response to Comment 3-3: As described in Section 2.3 of the Draft IS/MND, the proposed Project includes the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue that would connect Sunset Ridge Park to the Superior Parking Lot at the intersection of West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. This Project does not include a bridge over Pacific Coast Highway. Chambers Group, Inc. 34 21169 21-72 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #4 — REO Nationwide COMAffNT LETTERA From: G Gehlke <ci@reonationwide.com> on behalf of Team :5 reonationwide.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 6:52 PM To: Tran, Andy Subject: PCH and Superiorplans The corner's highest and best use to serve the community best with the least amount of added danger Comment to that high traffic high death rate corner is a police substation as was previously proposed in 4-1 conjunction with the community center idea last year. The north side of Newport relies on a police station on the south side of the city and with crime and accidents up in our area, a police substation Comment established priorto the added new development destined to proceed in the future (Banning Ranch) this 4-2 will greatly help to serve ourcommunity. A dog park or other "social" plan will add more traffic and pedestrian's to this already dangerousIComment corner. 4-3 Thankyou. Chambers Group, Inc. 35 21169 21-73 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #4 — REO Nationwide Response to Comment 4-1: Thank you for your comment. The purpose of the proposed Project is a construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue that would connect Sunset Ridge Park to the Superior Parking Lot at the intersection of West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.2 Project Purpose and Objectives, the Proposed Project aids in improving safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. This is an improvement from the present conditions where pedestrians and bicyclists typically cross the busy, major arterial roadways, West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue, to reach Sunset Ridge Park. Response to Comment 4-2: Please refer to Response to Comment 4-1. Police and other public services will be evaluated if development is proposed for Banning Ranch in the future. Currently there is no application on file proposing development of Banning Ranch. The development of the proposed bridge would also result in a beneficial impact because the bridge would provide increased safety and direct access from the parking lot to Sunset Ridge Park. For pedestrians traveling along the eastern sidewalk along Superior Avenue, the access point to the parking lot would remain in the same location, therefore the Project would not result in a change in traffic patterns over what is already expected along the roadway. Thus, no negative impacts related to access and safety along Superior Avenue is anticipated due to the Project. Response to Comment 4-3: There are no traffic trip rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual for dog parks. To determine the potential trips associated with a dog park, a comparison to a similar dog park in Laguna Beach was reviewed. The dog park in Laguna Beach is 2.5 acres in size and generates 480 trips per day. By comparison, the proposed 0.2-0.3 acre dog park would generate approximately 38 trips per day. Per the City Traffic Phasing Ordinance, a traffic impact study is required when there are more than 300 trips per day generated by a project. Given the estimated trips, it was determined that there is less than significant impact with the dog park portion of the Project. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.14.1 Impact a) the proposed Project, including the dog park, would not indirectly induce population growth and is intended to serve the existing population in the area. No roadways, transit, or bicycle lanes would be significantly modified as a result of the proposed Project and therefore, would not conflict with applicable circulation plans. As discussed in Section 4.17.1 Impact a) of the MND, the proposed Project would not result in a substantial increase of users that would generate a significant increase in traffic because no construction of businesses or residences would occur and no expansion of park facilities other than the small dog park are proposed. Chambers Group, Inc. 36 21169 21-74 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beoch, California Comment Letter #5 — REO Nationwide COMMENT LETTER#5 From: Cl Gehlke <cl@reonationwide.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 6:51 PM To: Tran, Andy Cc: Mark Wilser'; dgero@gmaili.com; Onecall4alll@verizon.net Subject: See attached letter re: Proposed Dog Park on Superior Ave. Attachments: Scan.pdf Please note attached letter regardingthe dog park. NOTE: Highest and best use for this property --Can a police substation please be considered as it was brought up as a possibility last year in conjunction with the possibility of a community center. 1. Less additional traffic on an already dangerouscorner 2. Better response time for police to the entire north side of Newport 3. Police presence that will be in place when Banning Ranch starts development Thank you.. C1Gehlke Thanks for letting me help you today! CJ Gehlke, CE0/17ounder licensed since 1979 DRE No. 00803243 REO Nationwide, Inc. Beneficial RE Inc. DRE No. 01334672 www.reonationwide.com Office: Newport Beach, CA 91663 Mail: 1927Harbor Blvd. Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 91627 ci@reonationwide.com phone: 888.700.0868 x326 fax: 888.700.0868 Linkedln: www.linkedin.comloublcarol-jean-%11cj%12-¢ehlkela/9151714 REO Disposition Outsource Services BPO and APPRAISAL Services - Individual or VolumeBulk BULK Sale Facilitation Your Outsource company for life. My team and I are committed to providing you with extraordinary personalized service 100% of the time. Our mission is to build a solid, life-long relationship with you. The goal is to meet and exceed your expectations for the lifetime of our relationship. We want you to be so happy with our services that you feel compelled to refer people you respect to us. The greatest compliment we can receive is a referral from you. CJ Comment 5-1 Comment 5-2 Comment 5-3 Comment 5-4 Chambers Group, Inc. 37 21169 21-75 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California September 4, 2019 Ms. Diane Dixon, Newport Beach Mayor Mr. Brad Avery, City Council Member Mr. Duffy Duffield, City Council Member Mr. Kevin Muldoon, City Council Member Mr. Jeff Hardman, City Council Member Ms. Joy Brenner, City Council Member Mr. Will O'Neill, City Council Member 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Via email: citvcouncil(o).newprtbeachca.aov Recreation & Senior Services Director LDetweiler(a) newportbeachca.aov CC: Villa Balboa Home Owners Association C/O Ryan Darby RDarby@actionlife.com Re: Proposed Dog Park on Superior Avenue Dear Ms. Dixon and City Council Members: I have recently become aware of the proposed dog park on Superior Avenue that is included in the project to add more parking for and a bridge to Sunset Ridge Park. Important Note: The following text is an example but should be replaced or modified Comment 5-5 with your personal thoughts ... for ideas see "Talking Points for Sunset View Dog Park I want to go on record with you and the Villa Balboa HOA in opposing the dog park. For its entire 40 -year existence the Villa Balboa community has prohibited dogs. This has been the basis for many residents to purchase homes there. The HOA Board has gone to considerable length to not modify any regulations as this would jeopardize this Comment grandfathered "no dogs" regulation. It is hard to see the logic of putting a dog park so 5-6 close to such a housing community when the city has other potential sites for a dog park. Research presented by a local resident at the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department hearing on August 6th confirmed other dog parks in our area (10 were profiled on google earth) have a material buffer zone between the dog park and residences. In this case the proposed dog park is immediately adjacent to a building with 54 homes (200 Paris Lane) and a complex (Villa Balboa) with 400 homes as well Comment as being next to a hospital property all connected to the proposed site by a walking 5-7 path. While the existing Newport Beach Civic Center dog park is shorter in distance to the few nearest homes it also has the busy MacArthur Boulevard with four lanes and a Chambers Group, Inc. 38 21169 21-76 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California median with trees providing a meaningful buffer and containment of the dogs that leave the dog park. It is my understanding that Villa Balboa homeowners who have emotional support or other medically prescribed dogs and attended a Villa Balboa HOA meeting regarding the agenda item of adding a bridge did so as they look forward to walking their dog in the large Sunset Ridge Park across the street. There are a number of other very practical reasons why this is not the right place nor time for a dog park at this location. • Superior Avenue is already a dangerous road with many accidents, including cars veering onto the sidewalk and even crashing through the Villa Balboa fence, in the vicinity of this location heading up hill from Pacific Coast Highway. The additional cars, people, and dogs (some of whom will inevitably get -off leash outside the dog park) will add distractions to drivers on an already dangerous road. • Smells, sounds, and pathogens carry, and those who enjoy the Sunset View Park and live near it will suffer. • Newport Beach already fails to enforce leash laws in Sunset View Park. -_ • The shade and benches essential to making this a usable dog park will also attract more homeless; there is already a homeless problem in the very parking lot that is being expanded. We know that neighbors near the existing Civic Center dog park, which is also near a homeless encampment, complain of finding needle caps at the dog park. For those of us who live near and use Sunset View Park, we know what a great job the City has done making that a tranquil vista for those seeking ocean, sunset, and even fireworks views. If you have been to Sunset View Park you will see that its many visitors de facto have expanded the park into an area now slated to become part of the dog park. There are many uses for this valuable land with a unique and beautiful view. And we encourage the City to consider expanding Sunset View Park or at a minimum providing further green space as part of its bridge and parking lot development. S ere Ms ly, Ml arol Jean Gehlke 200 Paris Lane Apt. 106 Newport Beach, CA. 92663 cj@reonationwide.com 949-500-9434 Comment 5-8 Comment 5-9 Comment 5-10 Comment 5-11 Comment 5-12 Comment 5-13 Chambers Group, Inc. 39 211&9 21-77 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #5 — REO Nationwide Response to Comment 5-1: Thank you for your comment. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.2 Project Purpose and Objectives, the Proposed Project aids in improving safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. This is an improvement from the present conditions where pedestrians and bicyclists typically cross the busy, major arterial roadways, West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue, to reach Sunset Ridge Park. Response to Comment 5-2: Please refer to Response to Comment 5-1. All traffic trips associated with Sunset Ridge Park (land use) are generated by the park visitors. The proposed parking lot expansion and bridge are not land uses and do not generate new trips. The parking lot and bridge are ancillary to the land use. The addition of the dog park has the potential to add 38 trips per day. Currently, the Sunset Ridge visitors park their vehicles where there are available parking spaces in the area. If the existing parking lot is full, park visitors find alternate parking places in the area, or drop off visitors and users. The addition of the 38 trips per day as a result of the dog park would be accommodated within the parking lot expansion. This additional traffic anticipated from the dog park is not expected to increase traffic hazards along the existing roadways. Response to Comment 5-3: Please refer to Response to Comment 5-1. Police service impacts were analyzed based on the proposed Project. Response time for police to other areas of Newport Beach is outside the scope of CEQA analysis, however your comments will be included as a part of City Council's consideration of the project. Response to Comment 5-4: Please refer to Response to Comment 5-3. Police presence during the development of Banning Ranch is outside the scope of CEQA analysis and impacts to Police Services would be evaluated if development is proposed for Banning Ranch. Response to Comment 5-5: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Response to Comment 5-6: As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.13.2 Impact a) the noise from the proposed dog park, from both dogs barking and dog -owners talking, would be well below (at least 30 dB below) ambient noise levels. Noise is only additive if the noise source is within 10 dB of ambient noise levels. Since noise from the proposed dog park would be at least 30 dB below ambient noise levels, it would not provide a quantitative contribution to existing ambient noise levels and will not be discernible at the nearby homes. A noise study was conducted for the Proposed Project to compare noise levels for similar activities at Chambers Group, Inc. �- 40 21169 21-78 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California other comparable facilities; and these noise measurements are presented in detail in Table 4-24 of the Draft IS/MND. Additionally, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate approximately 38 additional daily trips above current conditions, which would have a negligible impact to the nearby roadway noise levels. Therefore, it has been determined that the noise levels generated at the dog park would be within the City's exterior daytime and nighttime residential noise standards. The Proposed Project would not result in a significant impact to the nearest homes in the vicinity of the Project. Response to Comment 5-7: Please refer to Response to Comment 5-6. In addition, tree planting within the proposed Project site is included to provide a visual buffer around the Project site. The dog park is at a lower elevation that Sunset View Park and will be in a separate area. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.3.3, the design of the proposed 0.2-0.3 acre dog park includes the installation of 6 -foot tall fences, separating large and small dogs, thus clearly designating a space, specifically catered towards dogs and the pet owners. Installation of the fences would prevent dogs from exiting the designated park area and prevent dogs from entering any private properties or public roadways. Response to Comment 5-8: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Response to Comment 5-9: Thank you for your comment. Signage will be included that off -leash dogs must remain within the dog park area. Please refer to response to Comment 5-1. As outlined in the City's Municipal Code Chapter 7.04.020: "No person having the care, charge or control of any dog shall cause or allow, either willfully or through failure to exercise due care or control, such dog to be present upon any beach, street, alley, or public place, or upon any private property or premises other than his or her own without written consent of the owner or lessee of such land unless such dog is securely restrained by a substantial leash or chain not exceeding six feet in length and controlled by a person competent to restrain such dog. This section shall not be construed as allowing dogs on leashes in the areas from which dogs are prohibited as designated by Sections 7.04.025, 7.04.030, and 7.04.050. (Ord. 89-8 § 1, 1989: Ord. 1230 § 1, 1967: Ord. 796 (part), 1956: 1949 Code § 4107)." Park users shall comply with the City's code for use of dog restraints in public places. There are no traffic trip rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual for dog parks. To determine the potential trips associated with a dog park, a comparison to a similar dog park in Laguna Beach was reviewed. The dog park in Laguna Beach is 2.5 acres in size and generates 480 trips per day. By comparison, the proposed 0.2-0.3 acre dog park would generate approximately 38 trips per day. Per the City Traffic Phasing Ordinance, a traffic impact study is required when there are more than 300 trips per day generated by a project. Given the estimated trips, it was determined that there is less than significant impact with the dog park portion of the Project. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.14.1 Impact a) the proposed Project, including the dog park, would not indirectly induce population growth and is intended to serve the existing population in the area. Chambers Group, Inc. 41 21169 21-79 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California No roadways, transit, or bicycle lanes would be significantly modified as a result of the proposed Project and therefore, would not conflict with applicable circulation plans. As discussed in Section 4.17.1 Impact a) of the MND, the proposed Project would not result in a substantial increase of users that would generate a significant increase in traffic because no construction of businesses or residences would occur and no expansion of park facilities other than the small dog park are proposed. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.3.3, the design of the proposed 0.2-0.3 acre dog park includes the installation of 6 -foot tall fences, separating large and small dogs, thus clearly designating a space, specifically catered towards dogs and the pet owners. Installation of the fences would prevent dogs from exiting the designated park area and prevent dogs from entering any private properties or public roadways. Response to Comment 5-10: As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.3.3 Impact d) a regular maintenance schedule, including proper handling and removal of pet waste will be established to prevent accumulation of dog waste at the park thus preventing the generation of odor. Additionally, as part of the design, the dog park would include conveniently -sited waste receptacles away from residences, and provision of waste bags for owners' use. In addition, with the use of synthetic turf specifically designed for dog parks, the ease of cleaning and maintenance is increased. The appropriate disposal of dog waste onsite would minimize odors perceptible to people. Pursuant to Section 7.20.020 of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code, it is unlawful for a person in charge of any animal "to permit such animal to defecate and to allow the feces to thereafter remain on any public sidewalk, public beach or park or on any other public property or on any private property other than that of the owner..." The Project's provision and maintenance of bags for the disposal of dog waste and of trash receptacles at the dog park would facilitate compliance with Municipal Code Section 7.20.020. Thus, the dog park is not expected to result in any significant impacts in relation to odor from pet waste. The Project site is not anticipated to introduce any other objectionable odors. Response to Comment 5-11: Thank you for your comment. Please refer to Response to Comment 5-9. Response to Comment 5-12: Park hours will be enforced per the Municipal Code. A regular maintenance schedule will be maintained to ensure needles and other refuse are cleaned out of the dog park and proposed Project site. Park rangers will make regularly scheduled visits to parks. As outlined in the City's Municipal Code Chapter 7.04.020: "No person having the care, charge or control of any dog shall cause or allow, either willfully or through failure to exercise due care or control, such dog to be present upon any beach, street, alley, or public place, or upon any private property or premises other than his or her own without written consent of the owner or lessee of such land unless such dog is securely restrained by a substantial leash or chain not exceeding six feet in length and controlled by a person competent to restrain such dog. This section shall not be construed as allowing dogs on leashes in the areas from which dogs are prohibited as designated by Sections 7.04.025, 7.04.030, and 7.04.050. Chambers Group, Inc. 42 21169 21-80 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California (Ord. 89-8 § 1, 1989: Ord. 1230 § 1, 1967: Ord. 796 (part), 1956: 1949 Code § 4107)." Park users shall comply with the City's code for use of dog restraints in public places. Response to Comment 5-13: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Chambers Group, Inc. 43 21169 21-81 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #6 — REO Nationwide COMMENT LETTER#6 From: C1 Gehlke <ci@reonationwide.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 6:53 PM To: Tran, Andy Cc: 'Mark Wilser' Subject: Signage on PCH and Superior Thank you for your work on this dog park issue. I consult by profession on highest and best use issues for developers and lenders nationwide, and have done so for over 30 years. So I bring some experience to my suggestion. Again, the highestand best use for that corner with both present fatalities and accidents on that corner and the future Banning Ranch projectis: Police Sub -station. There is no police presence on this side of Newport. The quick response to the accidents and thefts here would be such a great thing for the community. A sub station was previously proposed as part of the community center idea. At that time, the voices from the neighborhood were loudly hoping that if anything proposed were resisted, the corner might be left alone. That corner is too expensive and high value dirt to leave alone. It will be developed. So to suggest what might service the community best with the dangerous corner in mind would be a far better response than simple and repeated opposition. Comment 6-1 It is my understanding that the Police Dept could be approached again, as they were involved previouslyI Comment on the prior plan to incorporate a substation there, askingfor supportfor a substation. 6-2 Less traffic, less pedestrians, presence both at the ready when needed and a visual deterrent to the Comment problems currently occurring on that corner. Not one day goes by that on my twice daily walk I am 6-3 nearly run down by a car blowing through a red and cars speeding through nearly hitting pedestrians. A cash infusion could be the result of the ticket potential from both unleashed dogs in both adjacent parks and the constant traffic infractions on thatcorner. Please redirect attention to a police substation as an alternate concept which would be highly useful, life saving and provide much needed support for the upcoming development next to the Ridge Parkas well. Thanks for letting me help you today! CJ Gehlke, CEO/Founder licensed since 1979 DRE No. 00803243 REO Nationwide, Inc. Beneficial RE Inc. DRE No. 01334672 www.reonationwide.com Office: Newport Beach, CA 92663 Mail: 1927Harbor Blvd. Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 ci@reonationwide.com phone: 888.700.0868 x 326 fax: 888.700.0868 Linkedin: www.(inkedin.com/pub/carol-iean-%22ci%22-Qehlkelal915/714 REO Disposition Outsource Services BPO and APPRAISAL Services - Individual or VolumeBulk BULK Sale Facilitation Comment 6-4 Chambers Group, Inc. 44 21169 21-82 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Your Outsource company for life. My team and I are committed to providing you with extraordinary personalized service 100% of the time. Our mission is to build a solid, life-long relationship with you. The goal is to meet and exceed your expectations far the lifetime of our relationship. We want you to be so happy with our services that you feel compelled to refer people you respect to us. The greatest compliment we can receive is a referral from you. CJ Chambers Group, Inc. 21169 45 21-83 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #6 — REO Nationwide Response to Comment 6-1: Thank you for your comment. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.2 Project Purpose and Objectives, the objectives of the Project a re: • To improve safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. • To provide additional parking spaces to better serve both passive uses and organized sporting events (mostly youth) at Sunset Ridge Park in an area where parking is limited. • To reduce traffic signal wait times by shifting pedestrian and bicycle traffic from the at -grade crosswalk to the bridge. • To expand recreational options in this part of the City by developing a small dog park just below Sunset View Park, adjacent to the expanded parking lot. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.2 Project Purpose and Objectives, the Proposed Project aids in improving safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. This is an improvement from the present conditions where pedestrians and bicyclists typically cross the busy, major arterial roadways, West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue, to reach Sunset Ridge Park. For pedestrians traveling along the eastern sidewalk along Superior Avenue, the access point to the parking lot would remain in the same location, therefore the Project would not result in a change in traffic patterns over what is already expected along the roadway. Response to Comment 6-2: Please refer to Response to Comment 6-1. Police services were analyzed for potential impacts created by this particular project. Provision of a police substation at this site is outside the scope of this CEQA analysis; however, this comment will be considered by City Council during the review of this Project. Response to Comment 6-3: Please refer to Response to Comment 6-1. Response to Comment 6-4: Thank you for your comment. Police and other public services will be evaluated if development is proposed in the area in the future. Currently there is no application on file proposing development of Ridge Park. Signage will be included that off -leash dogs must remain within the dog park area. As outlined in the City's Municipal Code Chapter 7.04.020: "No person having the care, charge or control of any dog shall cause or allow, either willfully or through failure to exercise due care or control, such dog to be present upon any beach, street, alley, or public place, or upon any private property or premises other than his or her own without written consent of the owner or lessee of such land unless such dog is Chambers Group, Inc. 46 21169 21-84 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California securely restrained by a substantial leash or chain not exceeding six feet in length and controlled by a person competent to restrain such dog. This section shall not be construed as allowing dogs on leashes in the areas from which dogs are prohibited as designated by Sections 7.04.025, 7.04.030, and 7.04.050. (Ord. 89-8 § 1, 1989: Ord. 1230 § 1, 1967: Ord. 796 (part), 1956: 1949 Code § 4107)." Park users shall comply with the City's code for use of dog restraints in public places. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.3.3, the design of the proposed 0.2-0.3 acre dog park includes the installation of 6 -foot tall fences, separating large and small dogs, thus clearly designating a space, specifically catered towards dogs and the pet owners. The dog park would also have ancillary facilities like a water fountain, benches, shade structure, security lighting, trash cans and waste bag dispensers for the pet owners' convenience and use. Some of these features would be absent in Sunset Ridge Park, namely the ability to allow dogs off -leash, thus acting as an incentive for pet owners to remain within the dog park. Installation of the fences would prevent dogs from exiting the designated park area and prevent dogs from entering any private properties, or public roadways. As noted above, provision of a police substation is outside the scope of the CEQA analysis for this project Chambers Group, Inc. 47 21169 21-85 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #7 — David Tanner COMMENT LETTER#7 From: Brine, Tony Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 12:19PM To: 'dave@earsi.com' Cc: Jurjis, Seimone; Webb, Dave (Public Works); Tran, Andy Subject: RE: Clarification of Updated CEQAGuidelines Dear Mr. Tanner, I have been asked to respond to your question regarding CEQA analysis of transportation/traffic impacts with City CIP projects, or private development projects. As I'm sure you are aware, Senate Bill 743 contains Guidelines regarding assessment of projects using VMT as the measure of transportation impacts. The CEQA Guidelines that implement 56 743 were approved on December 28, 2018. July 1, 2020 is the statewide implementation date and agencies may opt -in use of new metrics prior to that date. Prior to that July date, the city will determine our most appropriate thresholds. For the Superior Bridge project, the CEQA Transportation analysis was appropriate because there is no trip generation associated with the project. For the Newport Village Mixed Use development project, there will be a traditional traffic level of service (LOS) analysis and a CEQA vehicle miles travelled (VMT) analysis. The traffic analysis "Traffic Study" will use LOS as the impact threshold and will be prepared per the city's Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) guidelines. The CEQA analysis will be prepared using the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines. The use of both LOS and VMT will be model for traffic and transportation analysis for CEQA documents. I hope this helps answer yourquestions. Tony Brine, P.E., T.E. City Traffic Engineer 100 Civic CenterDrive Newport Beach, CA92660 Phone: (949) 644-3329 e-mail: tbrineanewoortbeachca.eov From: Jurjis, Seimone Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 3:00 PM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) <DAWebb@newportbeachca.gov>; Brine, Tony <tbri ne@ newportbeachca.gov> Subject: FW: Clarification of Updated CEQA Guidelines Chambers Group, Inc. 48 21169 21-86 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California From: dave@earsi.com [mailto:dave@earsi.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 2:39 PM To: Jurjis, Seimone <sjuriis@newportbeachca.gov> Cc: Harp, Aaron <aharp@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Clarification of Updated CEQAGuidelines Hi Seimone, I intentto make the following request for clarification at today's City Council meeting. Non -Agenda Item Clarification on the City's position regarding the implementation of the Resource Agencies Updated SEIMONEJUMIS, P.E.,C.B.O. 1 �•ti- Community Development Department Y P ,.. 5. �i �'"s�i Community Development Director ..: :v„un• siuriisC&newportbeachca.aov recent court decisions and changes to streamline the CEQA process. One of these changes was the 949-644-3282 From: dave@earsi.com [mailto:dave@earsi.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 2:39 PM To: Jurjis, Seimone <sjuriis@newportbeachca.gov> Cc: Harp, Aaron <aharp@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Clarification of Updated CEQAGuidelines Hi Seimone, I intentto make the following request for clarification at today's City Council meeting. Non -Agenda Item Clarification on the City's position regarding the implementation of the Resource Agencies Updated CEQA Guidelines On December 28, 2018 the Resources Agency adopted updated Guidelines for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The Updated Guidelines made significant changes reflecting recent court decisions and changes to streamline the CEQA process. One of these changes was the elimination of an analysis of a project's "Traffic" impacts and the inclusion of an analysis of a project's "Transportation" impacts. In simple terms "Traffic" is the evaluation of a project's vehicular delay and Comment congestion. "Transportation" is the evaluation of a project's vehicular trip lengths and vehicle miles 7-1 traveled. The City has published a Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project(Pa2019-014). (I support this Comment project but feel that the parking capacity should be increased by one or more underground parking 7-2 levels due to the scarcity of areas available for such uses.) The Draft CEQA document for this project does not contain an evaluation of the project's "traffic" impacts. It includes discussion of the project's "Transportation" impacts. In contrast Consent Calendar Items 13 on today's Agenda is the award of a contract for CEQA services for the Proposed NewportVillage Mixed -Use Project Located in the 2000 Block of West Coast Highway (PA2017-253). (I support Staff's conclusion an EIR be prepared for this project). However, the scope of Comment work for this EIR includes a TrafficStudy. 7-3 Therefore, I request the City clarify its position on this important elementof CEQA. How will "Traffic" be considered in CEQAdocuments? Feel free to call if you havequestions. Chambers Group, Inc. 49 21169 21-87 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Cheers, Dave David J. Tanner, President Environmental & Regulatory Specialists, Inc. 223 62nd Street Newport Beach, CA92663 949 646-8958 wk 949 233-0895 cell Notice of Confidentiality: This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the address(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, andany attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me by e-mail by replying to this message and permanently delete the original and any copy of any email and any printout thereof. Chambers Group, Inc. 50 21169 21-88 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #7 — David Tanner Response to Comment 7-1: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Response to Comment 7-2: The Draft IS/MND does contain analysis for transportation impacts, which includes a discussion on traffic patterns in the area and potential construction and operational impacts. Response to Comment 7-3: Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) was certified, adopted, and was included in the updated CEQA Guidelines. Under SB 743, auto delays in traffic (intersection Level of Service) would not be considered a significant impact under CEQA, rather, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) would be the metric for analyzing transportation impacts. There are no traffic trip rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual for dog parks. To determine the potential trips associated with a dog park, a comparison to a similar dog park in Laguna Beach was reviewed. The dog park in Laguna Beach is 2.5 acres in size and generates 480 trips per day. By comparison, the proposed 0.2-0.3 acre dog park would generate approximately 38 trips per day. Per the City Traffic Phasing Ordinance, a traffic impact study is required when there are more than 300 trips per day generated by a project. Given the estimated trips, it was determined that there is less than significant impact with the dog park portion of the Project. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.14.1 Impact a) the proposed Project, including the dog park, would not indirectly induce population growth and is intended to serve the existing population in the area. No roadways, transit, or bicycle lanes would be significantly modified as a result of the proposed Project and therefore, would not conflict with applicable circulation plans. As discussed in Section 4.17.1 Impact a) of the MND, the proposed Project would not result in a substantial increase of users that would generate a significant increase in traffic because no construction of businesses or residences would occur and no expansion of park facilities other than the small dog park are proposed. All traffic trips associated with Sunset Ridge Park (land use) are generated by the park visitors. The proposed parking lot expansion and bridge are not land uses and do not generate new trips. The parking lot and bridge are ancillary to the land use. Because there is no change to the park site with the Project area, there are no additional traffic trips that could be associated with the bridge and parking lot Project. The traffic trips associated with the park visitors, that will use the proposed bridge and expanded parking lot, already exist in the roadway system. Currently, the Sunset Ridge visitors park their vehicles where there are available parking spaces in the area. If the existing parking lot is full, park visitors find alternate parking places in the area, or drop off visitors and users. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.17.1 Impact a), the expanded parking lot associated with the proposed Project would serve existing park users and would not generate a significant increase in traffic because no businesses or residences are being constructed and no additional park facilities besides the dog park will be introduced. In fact, the parking lot would provide a designated parking area to diverge parking -related traffic from surrounding residential and commercial areas. Furthermore, there would be Chambers Group, Inc. 51 21169 21-89 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California no conflict with applicable circulation plans due to no significant proposed modifications to roadways, transit, or bicycle lanes. Chambers Group, Inc. 52 21169 21-90 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking lot Project /Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #8 —Sandy Frizzell COMMENT LETTER#8 From: Sandy <sandyfrizzell@road runner.com> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 9:19 PM To: Tran, Andy Subject: Lower Sunset View Park/Superior Avenue Pedestrianand Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Dear Mr.Tran, I live at 200 Paris on the second floor at the far corner of Superior Avenue and PCH in Villa Balboa. Sunset View Park is my front yard. I can see it from most rooms in my condo. I love it here. I enjoy the people, activities and of course the awesome views. These changes will greatly affect my life. Comment 8-1 1 have read the Initial Studythat is on line, not all of it, of course, but the parts that interest me. I have a few concerns. Would it be possible for us to meet, either in your office or even better at the site? I highly commend the city for both Sunset View and Sunset Ridge (except for the parking) Parks. They are both great additions to Newport Beach. I wantto like this project, but I need to understand it Comment better. Let me know if meeting is possible and if so when. 8-2 Thank you, Sandy Frizzell 949-646-3248 Chambers Group, Inc. 53 21169 21-91 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #8 — Sandy Frizzell Response to Comment 8-1: Thank you for your comment; this comment has been noted. Response to Comment 8-2: As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.2 Project Purpose and Objectives, the Proposed Project aids in improving safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. This is an improvement from the present conditions where pedestrians and bicyclists typically cross the busy, major arterial roadways, West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue, to reach Sunset Ridge Park. Due to West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue being major arterials with a high volume of vehicular traffic, the purpose of the bridge would not only improve safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park, but also improve the vehicular efficiency of the Superior Avenue/West Coast Highway intersection. Specifically, the objectives of the Project are: • To improve safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. • To provide additional parking spaces to better serve both passive uses and organized sporting events (mostly youth) at Sunset Ridge Park in an area where parking is limited. • To reduce traffic signal wait times by shifting pedestrian and bicycle traffic from the at -grade crosswalk to the bridge. • To expand recreational options in this part of the City by developing a small dog park just below Sunset View Park, adjacent to the expanded parking lot. The City has met with multiple local community groups to discuss the proposed Project, and appreciates the community's interest in the proposed Project. Chambers Group, Inc. 54 21169 21-92 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #9—Suresh Parikh COMMENT LETTER #9 From: Detweiler, Laura Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 20191:43 PM To: Tran, Andy Subject: FW: Proposed Dog Park on Superior Avenue Andy, making sure you received this as part of the public comment period. LAURA DETWEILER, MA I Director Recreation & Senior Services Department City of Newport Beach City Hall - 100 Civic Center Drive, Bay E, Newport Beach CA 92660 p: 949-644-3157 1 f: 949-644-3155 1 e: Idetweiler@newportbeachca.gov visit us: www.newportbeachca.gov/recreation Q@cityofnewportbeach ;- From: SURESH PARIKH <suresh parikh@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 3:53 PM To: citycouncil@newprtbeachca.gov; Detweiler, Laura <LDetweiler@newportbeachca.gov> Cc: Ryan Darby <rdarby@actionlife.com>; SURESH PARIKH <suresh parikh@hotmail.com> Subject: Proposed Dog Park on Superior Avenue Date: September 27, 2019 To: Ms. Diane Dixon, Newport Beach Mayor Mr. Brad Avery, City Council Member Mr. Duffy Duffield, City Council Member Mr. Kevin Muldoon, City Council Member Mr. Jeff Hardman, City Council Member Ms. Joy Brenner, City Council Member Mr. Will O'Neill, City Council Member City of Newport Beach, CA 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Chambers Group, Inc. 55 21169 21-93 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, Colifornia Dear Ms. Dixon and City Council Members, We have just recently become aware of the proposed dog park on SuperiorAvenue, which will be a part of or next to Sunset View Park (SSVP). We would like to go on record for expressing our COMPLETE OPPOSITION to this Comment proposed Dog Park. 9-1 (1)We moved into Villa Balboa (VBB) in 2016 with an assurance that VBB does not allow dogs in the Community Association. This was one of our basis to move into VBB. (2)We enjoy the use of SSVP, for an evening walk or for a daytime visit to the greens Comment and seating benches. 9-2 (3) The proposed Dog Park is so CLOSE to SSVP, without any buffer area between. Comment 9-3 (4)We have never seen any enforcement of Leash Laws at SSVP or Sunset Ridge Park Comment (SSRP).9-4 (5)Many dog owners HARDLY pick up after their dogs have excreted, leaving smell and comment stench of feces and urine. 9-5 (6)There could be harmful pathogens, parasites and diseases left from the dog feces and urine in the air near by, which could adversely affect health of the residents living next door. Comment 9-6 We live JUST FEW FEET AWAY. We certainly disapprove of this proposal. Sincerely. Suresh Parikh Usha Parikh 220 Nice Lane, # 315 Newport Beach, CA 92663 (949) 873-5656 suresh parikh hotmail.com Chambers Group, Inc. s 56 21169 21-94 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #9 — Suresh Parikh Response to Comment 9-1: Thank you for your comment; this comment noted. Response to Comment 9-2: Comment noted. Response to Comment 9-3: The proposed dog park will be approximately 50 feet downslope of Sunset View Park, and approximately 100 feet to the southwest of Sunset View Park. . Response to Comment 9-4: Signage will be included that off -leash dogs must remain within the dog park area. As outlined in the City's Municipal Code Chapter 7.04.020: "No person having the care, charge or control of any dog shall cause or allow, either willfully or through failure to exercise due care or control, such dog to be present upon any beach, street, alley, or public place, or upon any private property or premises other than his or her own without written consent of the owner or lessee of such land unless such dog is securely restrained by a substantial leash or chain not exceeding six feet in length and controlled by a person competent to restrain such dog. This section shall not be construed as allowing dogs on leashes in the areas from which dogs are prohibited as designated by Sections 7.04.025, 7.04.030, and 7.04.050. (Ord. 89-8 § 1, 1989: Ord. 1230 § 1, 1967: Ord. 796 (part), 1956: 1949 Code § 4107)." Park users shall comply with the City's code for use of dog restraints in public places. Response to Comment 9-5: Thank you for your comment. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.3.3, the design of the proposed 0.2-0.3 acre dog park includes the installation of 6 -foot tall fences, separating large and small dogs and enclosing the dog park, thus clearly designating a space, specifically catered towards dogs and the pet owners. Installation of the fences would prevent dogs from exiting the designated area and prevent dogs from entering any private properties, or public roadways. The dog park would also have ancillary facilities like a water fountain, benches, shade structure, security lighting, trash cans and waste bag dispensers for the pet owners' convenience and use. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.3.3 Impact d) a regular maintenance schedule, including proper handling and removal of pet waste.will be established to prevent accumulation of dog waste at the park thus preventing the generation of odor. Additionally, as part of the design, the dog park would include conveniently -sited waste receptacles away from residences, and provision of waste bags for owners' use. In addition, with the use of synthetic turf, the ease of cleaning and maintenance is increased. The appropriate disposal of dog waste onsite would minimize odors perceptible to people. Pursuant to Section 7.20.020 of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code, it is unlawful for a person in charge of any animal "to permit such animal to defecate and to allow the feces to thereafter remain on any public sidewalk, public beach or park or on any other public property or on any private property other than that Chambers Group, Inc. 57 21169 21-95 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California of the owner..." The Project's provision and maintenance of bags for the disposal of dog waste and of trash receptacles at the dog park would facilitate compliance with Municipal Code Section 7.20.020. Thus, the dog park is not expected to result in any significant impacts in relation to odor from pet waste. The Project site is not anticipated to introduce any other objectionable odors. In addition, as noted above, the proposed dog park is located downslope from the nearest residents. Response to Comment 9-6: Please refer to Response to Comment 9-5. Chambers Group, Inc. 58 21169 21-96 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #10—Tinnelly Law Group (Villa Balboa Attorney) COMMENT LETTER #10 TIN NELLY LAW GROUP ORAN G E COUNTY September 19;2019 271rJ1 P_.o R-?nl limp S C,.9 Fa97 P' VaU..S. Mail & Certified Mail. Return-Reeei ntReau ..e ed Sean Levin, Deputy Director Recreation and Senior Services Department City of Newport Beach LOSANGELES PO Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658 Ref.#: 7428 RIVERSIDE COUNTY RE: The Villa Balboa Community Association Objections to Proposed Sooset View Dog Park Dear W. Levin: SAN DIEGO Our office is general counsel to The Villa Balboa Community Association ("Association"), a 449 -unit condominium community located immediately nort he ast of ' the Sunset View Parkoff of Superior Blvd. in Newport Beach. SAN FRANCISCO BAY ARE4 \'(/e are aware that the City of Newport Beach has propo sed to construct a public dog park adjacent to Sunset View Park, directly next to the Association's community. T he Comment Association believes that this proposed dog park will have a significant and continuing 10-1 negative impact on the Association, its residents, and surrounding property values. To date, the City of Newport Beach has not indicated any willingness to minimize the harmful consequences of this propo sed dog park to neighboring communities. As a preliminary m atter, the Association already suffers from an influx of trespassers Comment who regularly abuse the Association's private amenities, such as parking, to access the 10-2 City's public parks and beaches located near the community. D esp ite the Association's diligent mitigation and enforcement measures, individuals routinely take advantage of Comment the Association's private parking to use the City's public amenities. These violations come with significant administrative costs required to deter this harmful conduct and to 10-3 protect the Association's community. Adding a nd. v public dog park next to the community will further cause irreparable harm to the Association and its residents as the Comment indiscriminate abuse of the parking facilities will continue to mount and increase with 10-4 new public amenities being added so close to the Association. In addition to the increase in trespass, the proposed dog park will constitute a nuisance to the Association and its residents as feces (including airborne fecal matter), urine, Comment noxious odors, and incessant dog barking will plague the residen ts. The Association 10-5 already experiences routine lapses in pet owner obligations to clean up after their pets as they walls through the public access path of Sunset View Park. Nearly every single day, afternoon onshore winds travel from the ocean towards and up the interior of Comment peninsula. With the development of the proposed dog park, these winds will pass 10-6 Chambers Group, Inc. 59 21169 21-97 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Levin September 19,2019 Page 2 oft 7928/60775 through the dog park and direct a pervasive stream of excrement and urine odors directly through the community every afternoon, almost without exception. Along with the nuisance odors, persistent barking, whistles, and loud noises will affect the Association's residents at allhours of the day. For the foregoing reasons, the Association is strongly opposed to any public dog park located near the Association's community. The Association would like the City of Newport Beach to take into consideration these significant and legitimate issues prior to approval any public dog park located in or around Sunset View park. We welcome the opportunity to open a dialogue with the City of Newport Beach to further review and discuss these concerns. Very truly yours, TINNELLYLAW GROUP MATTHEW PLAXTON, ESQ. i\tT'1':kk CC Bo.1rd of 1)jrc, l nr, - Yill.i lhlhn: l cNmnl llli(1 \ Jci limon 7MELLY LAW GROUP ,1 p'o(r{,ic,ti=lli' 1_1powilm 'U101 NO-10Rf::nLSui/r; 250 1 /-.11 is !on Viejo, CA 92691 Comment 10-6 Comment 10-7 Chambers Group, Inc. 60 21169 21-98 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #10 —Tinnelly Law Group (Villa Balboa Attorney) Response to Comment 10-1: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. The City of Newport Beach has met multiple times with the Villa Balboa community to hear concerns regarding the proposed Project. Response to Comment 10-2: Comment noted. This is outside the scope of CEQA analysis for this Project, but your comment will be included for City Council's consideration. Response to Comment 10-3: Comment noted. The proposed Project will provide additional parking for users of the proposed dog park, Sunset View Park, and Sunset Ridge Park. Response to Comment 10-4: As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.17.1 Impact a), the expanded parking lot associated with the proposed Project would serve existing park users and would not generate a significant increase in traffic because no businesses or residences are being constructed. In addition, the only park facility being introduced is the proposed 0.2 -0.3 -acre dog park expected to only generate approximately 38 vehicle trips per day. In fact, the expanded parking lot would provide a parking area to divert parking -related traffic from surrounding residential and commercial areas, as well as provide designated parking for the proposed dog park. Response to Comment 10-5: As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.3.3 Impact d) a regular maintenance schedule, including proper handling and removal of pet waste will be established to prevent accumulation of dog waste at the park thus preventing the generation of odor. Additionally, as part of the design, the dog park would include conveniently -sited waste receptacles away from residences, and provision of waste bags for owners' use. The appropriate disposal of dog waste onsite would minimize odors perceptible to people. Pursuant to Section 7.20.020 of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code, it is unlawful for a person in charge of any animal "to permit such animal to defecate and to allow the feces to thereafter remain on any public sidewalk, public beach or park or on any other public property or on any private property other than that of the owner..." The Project's provision and maintenance of bags for the disposal of dog waste and of trash receptacles at the dog park would facilitate compliance with Municipal Code Section 7.20.020. Thus, the dog park is not expected to result in any significant impacts in relation to odor from pet waste. The Project site is not anticipated to introduce any other objectionable odors. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.13.2 Impact a) the noise from the proposed dog park, from both dogs barking and dog -owners talking, would be well below (at least 30 dB below) ambient noise levels. Noise is only additive if the noise source is within 10 dB of ambient noise levels. Since noise from Chambers Group, Inc. 61 21169 21-99 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California i the proposed dog park would be at least 30 dB below ambient noise levels, it would not provide a quantitative contribution to existing ambient noise levels and will not be discernible at the nearby homes. A noise study was conducted for the Proposed Project to compare noise levels for similar activities at other comparable facilities; and these noise measurements are presented in detail in Table 4-24 of the Draft IS/MND. Additionally, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate approximately 38 additional daily trips above current conditions, which would have a negligible impact to the nearby roadway noise levels. Therefore, it has been determined that the noise levels generated at the dog park would be within the City's exterior daytime and nighttime residential noise standards. The Proposed Project would not result in a significant impact to the nearest homes in the vicinity of the Project. Response to Comment 10-6: Please refer to Response to Comment 10-5. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.3.3 Impact d) a regular maintenance schedule, including proper handling and removal of pet waste will be established to prevent accumulation of dog waste at the park thus preventing the generation of odor. Additionally, as part of the design, the dog park would include conveniently -sited waste receptacles away from residences, and provision of waste bags for owners' use. With the use of artificial turf at the Civic Center dog park in the City, the maintenance schedule has ensured that no waste or odors remain. The City plans to use artificial turf for the proposed Project's dog park as well. The southwest edge of Sunset View Park will block the line -of -sight between the proposed dog park and the Villa Balboa Condos. In fact the proposed dog park will be located more than 20 feet lower than the elevation at Sunset View Park. Since sound travels in straight lines, the southwest edge of Sunset View Park will effectively act like a 20 foot high sound wall between the proposed dog park and the condos. As such, only nominal construction noise impacts are anticipated to occur from the proposed project at the Villa Balboa Condos and no operational noise impacts from the proposed dog park or any other noise sources are anticipated to occur at the Villa Balboa Condos. Response to Comment 10-7: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Chambers Group, Inc. 62 21169 21-100 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #11—Michael Call, Mark Wilser, Deborah Gero COMMENT LETTER #11 From: Tran, Andy Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 7:54 AM To: 'Michael Call' Cc: 'Mark Wilser';'Deborah Gero'; Ryan Darby (rdarby@actionlife.com) Subject: RE: Could you keep us informed as to any meetings or general communications with Ryan Darby? It is my understanding that you will be contacting all the association for a follow-up and discussion on the environmental document (Mitigation Negative Declarati Good morning Michael, Mark and Deborah, I contacted Ryan Darby late yesterday afternoon to arrange for another community meeting with only Villa Balboa residents. Ryan has the tentative meeting information and will confirm with the HOA and get back to me this week. To avoid confusion, please check with Ryan as he is my single point of contact for Villa Balboa in regards to community meetings. With that said, I am always available to answer questions regarding the City's proposed improvements. You are welcome to email me your written comments on the environmental document with is a Mitigated Negative Declaration. We will provide a formal written response at the end of the 30 -day public review period. This is the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process that the City is required to follow for this type of project. Thank you, Andy Tran, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone:949-644-3315 From: Michael Call <onecall4alll@verizon.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 2:54 PM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Cc:'Mark WiIse r'<mw@globaIca pitalmarkets.com>;'Deborah Gero' <debigero@gmail.com> Subject: Could you keep us informed as to any meetings or general communications with Ryan Darby? It is my understanding that you will be contacting all the association for a follow-up and discussion on the environmental document (Mitigation Negative Declaration) Hello Andy Tran, Could you keep us informed as to any meetings or general communications with Ryan Darby? ItComment is my understanding that you will be contacting all the association for a follow-up and discussionT 11-1 Chambers Group, Inc. 63 21169 21-101 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California on the environmental document (Mitigation Negative Declaration) for the Superior Ave Ped Bridge, Parking Lot and Dog Park. Us means: Comment Mark Wilser mw@alobalcapitalmarkets.com 11-1 Deborah Gero debi ero@gmail.com continued Michael Call onecall4a111(a.verizon.net Thank you, Michael Call 210 Lille Lane 208 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Cell (714) 791-1102 From: Michael Call [mailto:onecall4alll(&verizon.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2019 11:24 AM To: Tran, Andy' Cc: 'Mark Wilsey'; 'Deborah Gero' Subject: Where is the link to the report? What is the MND public review period? How do we make our comments know to the decision makes? Comment Where is the link to the report? 11-2 What is the MND public review period? 11-3 How do we make our comments know to the decision makes? 11-4 When will you be at Villa Balboa for comments on the report? 11-5 From: Tran, Andy [mailto:ATran(inewportbeachca.gov] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 7:42 AM To: 'Michael Call' Cc: 'Mark Wilsey; 'Deborah Gero' Subject: RE: What is the MND public review period? How do we make our comments know to the decision makes? Good morning everyone, The MND public review period is an opportunity for the public to comment on the environmental document that was prepared for this project. N1ND's include many technical studies and mitigation measures to address potential impacts. These technical studies include noise and visual impacts to name a few. Feel free to send me your written comments via email or letter. We will provide a formal response at the end of the 30 -day review period. Thanks, Andy Tran, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Chambers Group, Inc. 64 21169 21-102 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone:949-644-3315 From: Michael Call <onecall4alll@verizon.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 5:13 PM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Cc:'Mark Wilser'<mw@globalcapitalmarkets.com>;'Deborah Gero' <debigero@gmail.com> Subject: What is the MND public review period? How do we make our comments know to the decision makes? Andy, What is the MND public review period? How do we make our comments know to the decision makes?Comment Thank you, 11-6 Michael Call From: Tran, Andy[mailto:ATran('Onewportbeachca.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 11:16 AM Subject: FW: City of Newport Beach: UPDATED - Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Good morning everyone, I wanted to inform everyone that our environmental document (Mitigation Negative Declaration) is currently available for public review (see below). Some of you will be receiving a notice in the mail regarding this matter. During our community meetings back in May and June of this year, I may have mentioned that City Council will consider the adoption of this document and the conceptual design on October 22, 2019. This date has been tentatively postponed to November 19, 2019. The exact date of this meeting is largely dependent on the comments that the City may during the MND public review period. Please check the project webpage (www.newportbeachca.gov/superiorbridge) regularly for up- to-date project information. Also, please share this email with your community members. Thank you, Andy Tran, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: 949-644-3315 Chambers Group, Inc. 65 21169 21-103 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California From: NoReply@newportbeachca.gov Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 10:04 AM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: City of Newport Beach: UPDATED - Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Content Updated: This News has been previously sent out. UPDATED - Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project (PA2019-014) Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project. The Initial Study is available for a 30 -day public review period beginning September 23, 2019, and ending October 23, 2019. Post Date: 09/24/2019 9:00 am Planning Division News Splash: UPDATED REVIEW PERIOD NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY AND INTENTTO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE SUPERIOR AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE BRIDGE AND PARKING LOT PROJECT (PA2019-014) Notice is hereby given that the City of Newport Beach (Lead Agency) has completed an Initial Study and intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project, prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the CEClA Guidelines. Project Title: Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Chambers Group, Inc. 66 21169 21-104 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Project Applicant: City of Newport Beach Project Location: The proposed Project is located within the City of Newport Beach and is located approximately 1,000 feet from the coastline in Orange County, California. The entire Project site is within the boundary of the coastal zone as established by the California Coastal Act. Currently, an existing City -owned parking lot with 64 metered parking stalls is located at the northeast corner of this intersection. Directly east of the existing parking lot is an undeveloped piece of land with steep slopes. The Project site is surrounded by the Pacific Ocean, Sunset View Park, Sunset Ridge Park, vegetated hillsides, major roads, and residential homes. Superior Avenue runs along the western boundary and the West Coast Highway runs along the southern boundaries of the Project site, respectively. Project Description: The City proposes the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue, a new larger parking lot and a fenced dog park totaling approximately 3.4 acres in size. Due to the proximity to the coast, the area receives a significant amount of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Sunset Ridge Park, constructed in December 2014, is a '. 13.7 -acre active park with a baseball field and two soccer fields. Currently, visitors to Sunset Ridge Park use the existing parking lot across Superior Avenue and cross at the at -grade Superior Avenue/West Coast Highway intersection because no on-site parking is provided at Sunset Ridge Park. The new pedestrian and bicycle ramp will provide access to the parking lot and bridge from the north side of West Coast Highway. Additionally, the proposed Project would include the construction of a new sidewalk/bike path from the modified parking lot entrance to the proposed bridge. The proposed bridge would help facilitate movement of pedestrians and bicyclists across Superior Avenue. The proposed bridge would connect Sunset Ridge Park to a new, larger asphalt parking lot with a range of 100 to 128 parking spaces. Construction of the proposed Project would also include the installation of a fenced dog park, separating large and small dogs, which may include benches and trash cans. The dog park will be 0.2 to 0.3 acres in size. The dog park would require a new water service for the water fountain and for irrigation. Security lighting at the dog park would be down -shielded to prevent light scatter. Hours at the dog park would be consistent with the Municipal Code which restricts park hours to between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. In addition, a shade structure may be installed at the dog park, approximately 10 to 15 feet in height. The top of the shade structure would be below the Sunset View Park ground elevation and would be designed to protect public coastal views. Development of the proposed project would require the following approvals from the City of Newport Beach: • Coastal Development Permit (CDP) —To allow development of the project including the parking lot, dog park, and pedestrian/bicycle bridge in the Coastal Zone. • Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) —To address reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the legislative and project specific discretionary approvals pursuant to CEQA. Chambers Group, Inc. 67 21169 21-105 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Cot Project Newport Beach, California Development of the proposed project would require the following approval from the California Coastal Commission: • Coastal Development Permit Amendment—To amend the Sunset Ridge Park Coastal Development Permit No. 5-11-302 to allow the bridge development at the existing park. On the basis of the Initial Study, City staff has concluded that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment and has therefore recommended preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The Mitigated Negative Declaration is based on the finding that, by implementing the identified mitigation measures, the project's potential ` significant adverse impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level. The Initial Study is available for a 30 -day public review period beginning September 23, 2019, and ending October 23, 2019. Copies of the document are available for review in the Newport Beach Community Development Department, 100 Civic Center Drive, Bay B, Newport Beach, CA 92660 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on Friday. The document is available online: www.newportbeachca.gov/cepa. Additionally, copies of the document are also available for review at the following City public libraries during regular business hours: *Newport Beach Public Library, Central Library, 1000 Avocado Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Balboa Branch, 100 East Balboa Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Mariners Branch, 1300 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Corona Del Mar Branch, 410 Marigold Avenue, Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 Written comments on the proposed project must be received no later than October 23, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. to the attention of Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer, at the address listed below or via email. Your comments should specifically identify what environmental impacts you believe would result from the project, why they are significant, and what changes or mitigation measures you believe should be adopted to eliminate or reduce these impacts. There is no fee to submit comments. You are also invited to attend and testify at the public hearings as to the appropriateness of this document. The Newport Beach City Council will hold a hearing on the project at a future date in the City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. An additional public hearing notice will be sent out prior to the City Council's consideration of the project. For further information as to the future schedule of hearings, please check: https://www. newportbeachca.gov/government/depa rtments/pu blic-works/superior-avenue- pedestria n -a nd-bicycle-bridge-and-pa rki ng -lot -project. Chambers Group, Inc. 68 21169 21-106 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California For additional information, please contact Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer, at (949) 644-3315 or at atran@newportbeachca.gov. Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach, Public Works Department 100 Civic Center Drive, Bay D-2 Newport Beach, CA 92660 i Please note: This is an automated message from the City of Newport Beach. Subscription preferences may be changed by accessing your News & Alerts account from the City website. Having trouble viewing this email? View on the website instead. Change your eNotification preference. Unsubscribe from all City of Newport Beach eNotifications. Chambers Group, Inc. 69 21169 21-107 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #11— Michael Call, Mark Wilser, Deborah Gero Response to Comment 11-1: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Response to Comment 11-2: The link to the report was posted at: https://www.newportbeachca.gov/government/departments/commun ity-development/planning- division/projects-environmental-document-download-page/environmental-document-download-page Response to Comment 11-3: On September 23, 2019, the City of Newport Beach circulated a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study to responsible agencies, trustee agencies, interest groups, and the general public. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 21091 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, a 30 -day public review period for the Final IS/MND was provided from September 23, 2019 to October 23, 2019. Response to Comment 11-4: Written comments were accepted via mail, or email between September 23, 2019 to October 23, 2019 as posted in the Notice of Availability. In addition, comments on the proposed Project as a whole may be made to City Council as a part of the public hearing process Response to Comment 11-5: The Draft MND was made available at public locations including City Hall and local library branches. Comments were received via mail and email. Response to Comment 11-6: Please refer to Response to Comment 11-3. The purpose of the public review period is to allow both agencies and the public to comment on the Draft MND focusing on the sufficiency of the document in identifying and analyzing possible impacts on the environment and ways in which the significant effects may be avoided or mitigated (CEQA Guidelines Section 15204). Chambers Group, Inc. 70 21169 21-108 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #12 — Mali Saatchi COMMENT LETTER #12 From the Desk of Mali Saatchi October 3, 2019 Newport Beach City Council 100 Civic Center Dr Newport Beach CA 926660 Re: Proposed Dog Park at Sunset View Park To Whom It May Concern: My name is Mali Saatchi and I have been a resident of Newport Beach since 2005. Since that time I have resided at the Villa Balboa condominium complex directly across to the Sunset View Park. I am a dog owner and animal lover. For decades, Sunset View Park was nothing but astrip of dirt. It was only after fruitful cooperation of the community that we were able to successfully encourage the City of Newport Beach to convert the space into a peaceful and tranquil public space for all to enjoy. Despite the larger Sunset Ridge Park being across Superior Ave, Sunset View Park is daily visited by families, Doctors, nurses and patients of HOAG Hospital, and others seeking to enjoy the tranquility of the park, fresh air and breathtaking views. Every Fourth of July hundreds of people line the park to enjoy the fireworks from near and far and spending time in this amazing space with best unobstructed views. During the Huntington Beach airshows, again hundreds use this park to enjoy the spectacular aerial shows our brave armed forces put on. Comment My home is directly above the park, and from every room in my home I am able to seethe 12-1 diverse people that enjoy what the park has to offer. Every Saturday group of ex- patients from the HOAGwho otherwise have no access to expansive green spaces are able to walk, by wheelchairs or getting support from a friend come to the park and safely take in the scenery and fresh air. Families frequently come with their young children because this park is safe and away from the street,. Community members use the park as part of their exercise or relaxation routines. I am writing this letter to the respected City Council and Mayor of Newport Beach in Opposition to the proposed dog park at Sunset View. The neighboring communities along Superior Avenue already must contend with heavy traffic and the air pollution and noise caused by this traffic. By extending the parking lot and converting portion of the Sunset View Park to a dog park, the City will be creating a public burden. The homes immediately surrounding the park are mainly condominiums, and at this very few large dogs frequent the park. There is a large Sunset Ridge park across the Superior Avenue and Comment every day the dog owners take advantage of the long walk with their dogs. considering a dog 12-2 Pagel of 3 Chambers Group, Inc. 71 21169 21-109 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beoch, California From the Desk of Mali Saatchi Comment park on the beach and another park 10 minutes away near the Orange County Fairgrounds. A 12-2 dog park at Sunset View would not benefit the local community as the park itself is situated in continued such away as to be inconvenient to reach, with no immediately accessible parking. Expansion of the parking lot would serve beach goers more than the proposed dog park itself. This will create Comment increased traffic congestion on an already congested road, and also create a situation where 12-3 non-residents will use the residential streets to park theirvehicles. Comment This proposed dog park also creates a health and safety hazard for the community. Superior 12-4 Avenue, as it meets Pacific Coast Highway, is already traffic jammed and accident prone. Nearly Comment weekly there are significant accidents on this two block stretch of road due to the curvature. 12-5 Placement of adog park at this juncture is apublic safety hazard as dogs may dart into Comment oncoming traffic. Animals that may not otherwise be aggressive may be startled by the constant 12-6 vehicle traffic, horns, and other loud noises, creating a liability for the City and residents. It is unlikely that the City can enforce or otherwise secure the park 24/7 without creating a further Comment burden on the City's police department. Dog parks that are so enclosed, and "off the beaten 12-7 pat h".may become a target for crime and vandalism. Comment 12-8 Further, there is a health hazard created by a dog park in such close proximity to homes. Even at the construction of Sunset View Park, myself and my neighbors had to make repeated Comment calls to the City of Newport Beach to have the lid of the one and only trash can installed on SSV 12-9 reoriented so that the smell of the trash did not blow directly into our homes. Despite this, in the heat of the summer, the overwhelming smell of garbage is still pervasive. Even the most well-maintained dog parks have significant odor and bacterial issues. Maintaining dog parks are expensive and a cost burden to the community over the long term. The smell and presence of Comment urine and feces will create an environmental hazard as well as a health hazard in the hot summer 12-10 months for the local community. Dog parks have limited life spans, and must be constantly maintained and renovated. By converting this already limited open space to a single use dog park, only suitable for a very Comment specific population of residents who are not underserved, the City will be removing the public 12-11 accessto open spaces with clean air and removing public enjoyment. Creation of this dog park will place an undue burden on the local community via increasedComment vehicle and foot traffic, hazardous conditions, and a decline in property values in the immediate 12-12 vicinity. Dog parks do not create local jobs nor do they serve a larger community purpose by functioning as an open and welcoming community space, considering there is ample space at the Comment sunset ridge for the owners to chit chat and dogs socialise in small groups. The current Sunset 12-13 View Park does function as an open and welcoming space for all in thecommunity. I propose the space should be converted to a green and beautiful space, not only to help the Comment incredible amount of environment and air pollution, but to beautify the Superior Avenue. 12-14 Page 2 of3 Chambers Group, Inc. 72 21169 21-110 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California From the Desk of Mali Saatchi I thank the respected City Council for consideration of my statements as a community member who will be directly affected by the creation of a dog park. With most sincere regards, Malakeh Saatchi 200 Paris Lane, Number 314 Newport each, 92663 Page 3 of 3 Chambers Group, Inc. �73 21169 21-111 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #12 — Mali Saatchi Response to Comment 12-1: Thank you for your comment. There are no traffic trip rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual for dog parks. To determine the potential trips associated with a dog park, a comparison to a similar dog park in Laguna Beach was reviewed. The dog park in Laguna Beach is 2.5 acres in size and generates 480 trips per day. By comparison, the proposed 0.2-0.3 acre dog park would generate approximately 38 trips per day. Per the City Traffic Phasing Ordinance, a traffic impact study is required when there are more than 300 trips per day generated by a project. Given the estimated trips, it was determined that there is less than significant impact with the dog park portion of the Project. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.14.1 Impact a) the proposed Project, including the dog park, would not indirectly induce population growth and is intended to serve the existing population in the area. No roadways, transit, or bicycle lanes would be significantly modified as a result of the proposed Project and therefore, would not conflict with applicable circulation plans. As discussed in Section 4.17.1 Impact a) of the MND, the proposed Project would not result in a substantial increase of users that would generate a significant increase in traffic because no construction of businesses or residences would occur and no expansion of park facilities other than the small dog park are proposed. All traffic trips associated with Sunset Ridge Park (land use) are generated by the park visitors. The proposed parking lot expansion and bridge are not land uses and do not generate new trips. The parking lot and bridge are ancillary to the land use. Because there is no change to the Sunset Ridge Park site, there are no additional traffic trips that could be associated with the bridge and parking lot Project. The traffic trips associated with the park visitors, that will use the proposed bridge and expanded parking lot, already exist in the roadway system. Currently, the Sunset Ridge Park visitors park their vehicles where there are available parking spaces in the area. If the existing parking lot is full, park visitors find alternate parking places in the area, or drop off visitors and users. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.17.1 Impact a), the expanded parking lot associated with the proposed Project would serve existing park users and would not generate a significant increase in traffic because no businesses or residences are being constructed and no additional park facilities besides the dog park will be introduced. In fact, the parking lot would provide a designated parking area to diverge parking -related traffic from surrounding residential and commercial areas. Furthermore, there would be no conflict with applicable circulation plans due to no significant proposed modifications to roadways, transit, or bicycle lanes. These factors would prevent increased traffic generation due to the construction of the large parking lot. Response to Comment 12-2: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Response to Comment 12-3: Please see Response to Comment 12-1. Chambers Group, Inc. 74 21169 21-112 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response to Comment 12-4: As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.2 Project Purpose and Objectives, the Proposed Project aids in improving safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. This is an improvement from the present conditions where pedestrians and bicyclists typically cross the busy, major arterial roadways, West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue, to reach Sunset Ridge Park. For pedestrians traveling along the eastern sidewalk along Superior Avenue, the access point to the parking lot would remain in the same location, therefore the Project would not result in a change in traffic patterns over what is already expected along the roadway. Thus, no negative impacts related to access and safety along Superior Avenue are anticipated due to the Project. Response to Comment 12-5: Please see Response to Comment 12-4 Response to Comment 12-6: As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.3.3, the design of the proposed 0.2-0.3 acre dog park includes the installation of 6 -foot tall fences, enclosing the dog park and also separating large and small dogs, thus clearly designating a space, specifically catered towards dogs and the pet owners. Installation of the fences would prevent dogs from exiting the designated park area and prevent dogs from entering any private properties or public roadways. Response to Comment 12-7: Please see Response to Comment 12-6. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.3.3, hours at the dog park would be consistent with the Municipal Code which restricts park hours to between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. As noted in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.15, the Newport Beach Police Department is located at 870 Santa Barbara Drive, and is approximately 5 miles northeast from the proposed Project (Google Maps 2019). The proposed Project would not result in increased populations that would require additional public services, nor would it impact the nearest police station. Response to Comment 12-8: Please see Response to Comment 12-7. Assessment of crime and vandalism is outside the scope of CEQA; however, this comment will be considered by the City Council in their review of the Project and CEQA document. Response to Comment 12-9: As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.3.3 Impact d) a regular maintenance schedule, including proper handling and removal of pet waste will be established to prevent accumulation of dog waste at the park thus preventing the generation of odor. Additionally, as part of the design, the dog park would include conveniently -sited waste receptacles away from residences, and provision of waste bags for Chambers Group, Inc. 75 21169 21-113 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California owners' use. In addition, with the use of synthetic turf specifically designed for dog parks, the ease of cleaning and maintenance is increased. The appropriate disposal of dog waste onsite would minimize odors perceptible to people. Pursuant to Section 7.20.020 of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code, it is unlawful for a person in charge of any animal "to permit such animal to defecate and to allow the feces to thereafter remain on any public sidewalk, public beach or park or on any other public property or on any private property other than that of the owner..." The Project's provision and maintenance of bags for the disposal of dog waste and of trash receptacles at the dog park would facilitate compliance with Municipal Code Section 7.20.020. Response to Comment 12-10: Please refer to Response to Comment 12-9. Response to Comment 12-11: Comment noted. Please refer to Response to Comment 12-4. The objective of the proposed Project is to provide connectivity between the parking lot and park uses. Response to Comment 12-12: Comment noted. Please referto Response to Comment 12-1. Response to Comment 12-13: Comment noted. Response to Comment 12-14: Comment noted. Chambers Group, Inc. 21169 F. 21-114 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #13 — REO Nationwide COMMENT LETTER #13 From: CJ Gehlke <ci@reonationwide.com> Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2019 3:56 PM To: Tran, Andy Subject: FW: Air Show and PCH/Superior Andy Tran... Please consider utilizing this view and the safety of the corner and neighbor hood..see below.... thank you! CJ ...... From: Dixon, Diane [mailto:ddixon( newportbeachca.gov] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2019 3:49 PM To: CJ Gehlke Subject: Re: Air Show and PCH/Superior Great ideas! Thank you! Diane Diane B Dixon, Mayor Council Member District 1 949.287.9211 On Oct 5, 2019, at 3:35 PM, CJ Gehlke <ci@reonationwide.com> wrote: PS.. Just an additional thought.. the Air Show was this weekend.. that corner is used by residents to maximize the incredible view opportunity with the elevation being so high there.. this weekend, the fourth of July.. and most every weekend.. along with every time there is a beautiful sunset. People can easily park in the lot of Superior, and they bring chairs, towels.. soft drinks and food.. The residents are telling us what they want there.. Consider: a police substation as that corner and surrounding area is in need of a police presence both for traffic and thefts.. an extended grassy area with picnic tables and Comment places to sit and enjoy the view with friends and a gathering that is too big for a small 13-1 park bench further down the walkway. That area has the most magnificent view due to its elevation ... far betterthan any place in the park across the street. Dogs in a dog park do not appreciate the view... Please consider making this area view and safety based... a police substation and a place for people to gatherto enjoy the view and sunsets year round. View is far superiorto the parks all lower elevation. Thankyou! Chambers Group, Inc. 21169 21-115 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Hello Diane Dixon... thank you for your work on behalf of our City. By way of introduction, I consult by profession on highest and best use issues for developers and lenders nationwide, and have done so for over 30 years. So I bring some experience to my suggestion. A request for consideration for the highest and best use for the corner of PCH and Superior with both present fatalities and accidents on that corner and the future Banning Ranch project is: Police Sub -station. There is no police presence on this side of Newport. The quick response to the accidents and thefts here would be such a great thing for the community. A sub station was previously proposed as part of the community center idea. At that time, the voices from the neighborhood were loudly hoping that if anything proposed were resisted, the corner might be left alone. That corner is too expensive and high value dirt to leave alone. It will be developed. So to suggest what might service the community best with the dangerous corner in mind would be a far better response than simple and repeated opposition. It is my understanding that the Police Dept could be approached again, as they were involved previously on the prior plan to incorporate a substation there, asking for support for a substation. Less traffic, less pedestrians, presence both at the ready when needed and a visual deterrent to the problems currently occurring on that corner. Not one day goes by that on my twice daily walk I am nearly run down by a car blowing through a red and cars speeding through nearly hitting pedestrians. A cash infusion could be the result of the ticket potential from both unleashed dogs in both adjacent parks and the constant traffic infractions on that corner. Please redirect attention to a police substation as an alternate concept which would be highly useful, life saving and provide much needed support for the upcoming development next to the Ridge Park as well. Thanks for letting me help you today! CJ Gehlke, CEO/Founder licensed since 1979 DRE No. 00803243 REO Nationwide, Inc. Beneficial RE Inc. DRE No. 01334671 www.reonationwide.com Office: Newport Beach, CA 92663 Mail: 1927 Harbor Blvd. Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 cioreonationwid e. com phone: 888.700.0868 x 326 fax: 888.700.0868 Linkedln: www.linkedin.com/pub/carol-iean-%22ci%22--gehlke/a/9l5/714 REO Disposition Outsource Services BPO and APPRAISAL Services - Individual or Volume Bulk BULK Sale Facilitation Chambers Group, Inc. 78 21169 21-116 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #13 — REO Nationwide Response to Comment 13-1: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. As noted in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.15, the Newport Beach Police Department is located at 870 Santa Barbara Drive, and is approximately 5 miles northeast from the proposed Project (Google Maps 2019). The proposed Project would not result in increased populations that would require additional public services, nor would it impact the nearest police station. The provision of a police station is outside the scope of CEQA analysis for this Project, but your comment will be included for City Council's consideration. Chambers Group, Inc. 21169 m 21-117 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #14 — Sandy Frizzell Comment Letter 14 October, 2019 To our city planners, I was unable to attend the Aug. 6 meeting regarding the plans for Lower Sunset View Park. On Sept. 11 1 attended the Speak Up meeting and found out where the planned Dog Park is to be build. The mailer is deceiving. I was in disbelief! I live in Villa Balboa at 200 Paris Lane #214 on the second floor of the most NW corner of the Paris building, Superior and PCH. From my unit I can see the Sunset View Park from Comment most rooms in my unit. Sunset View Park is my "front yard." And you want to build a dog park on one of 14-1 the most prized viewing locations of West Newport Beach!!! There are many better locations for a dog park. Regarding use of Lower Sunset View Park, adding parking is good use of this property for people to better use sunset Ridge Park. The most valuable part of Sunset View Park is the dirt mound. It is enjoyed by residence every day, all day; morning, noon and especially at Sunset. People walk, ride their bikes, put up tripods, stand and sit there to take in the beautiful views. I call it Comment Inspiration Point. I have many photos to show you. It would be a crime to do anything other than 14-2 to enhance this small space for its best use, THE VIEW. Let the people continue to enjoy the spectacular views from this prime property. Please do not obstruct the view in any way. I love dogs, but this is not the place for a dog park. We do not want the added noise, traffic and smells of a dog park. It seems to me an easy solution is to move the Dog Park to a lower area in the lower part Comment of Sunset View Park toward PCH. I understand the city envisions a road to the Hoag parking lot. It is 14-3 highly unlikely Hoag will ever allow this. It is a win-win without ruining the view for visitors and residence to put the dog park in the lower part of SVP. There should be nothing built or added to obstruct the view. I suggest enhancing the dirt mound by adding a little walk way and some sturdy Comment grass, maybe even expanding it toward the CoGent Plant. 14-4 Please do not take away Inspiration Point from the residence of Newport Beach, visitors and residents of Comment Villa Balboa. Let us continue to enjoying our treasured views. 14-5 Sandy Frizzell 200 Paris Ln#214 Newport Beach, CA 92663 949-646-3248 sandyfrizzell@roadrunner.com Chambers Group, Inc. 80 21169 21-118 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #14 — Sandy Frizzell Response to Comment 14-1: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Response to Comment 14-2: The City of Newport Beach General Plan designates public viewpoints for coastal views within the city. Areas near the Project site that have such designation include Sunset Ridge Park, Sunset View Park, and along the trail above the current parking lot, including the designated point where a bench was installed. The City's Local Coastal Plan also designates the same public view points in the designated parks and along the paved trail that fronts the Villa Balboa Community. Further, the bridge associated with the Project will provide safer unobstructed views of the coast. Response to Comment 14-3: As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.13.2 Impact a) the noise from the proposed dog park, from both dogs barking and dog -owners talking, would be well below (at least 30 dB below) ambient noise levels. Noise is only additive if the noise source is within 10 dB of ambient noise levels. Since noise from the proposed dog park would be at least 30 dB below ambient noise levels, it would not provide a quantitative contribution to existing ambient noise levels and will not be discernible at the nearby homes. A noise study was conducted for the Proposed Project to compare noise levels for similar activities at other comparable facilities; and these noise measurements are presented in detail in Table 4-24 of the Draft IS/MND. Additionally, according to the CaIEEMod model run, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate nine or fewer additional daily trips above current conditions, which would have a negligible impact to the nearby roadway noise levels. Therefore, it has been determined that the noise levels generated at the dog park would be within the City's exterior daytime and nighttime residential noise standards. The Proposed Project would not result in a significant impact to the nearest homes in the vicinity of the Project. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.3.3 Impact d) a regular maintenance schedule, including proper handling and removal of pet waste will be established to prevent accumulation of dog waste at the park thus preventing the generation of odor. Additionally, as part of the design, the dog park would include conveniently -sited waste receptacles away from residences, and provision of waste bags for owners' use. In addition, with the use of synthetic turf specifically designed for dog parks, the ease of cleaning and maintenance is increased. The appropriate disposal of dog waste onsite would minimize odors perceptible to people. Pursuant to Section 7.20.020 of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code, it is unlawful for a person in charge of any animal "to permit such animal to defecate and to allow the feces to thereafter remain on any public sidewalk, public beach or park or on any other public property or on any private property other than that of the owner..." The Project's provision and maintenance of bags for the disposal of dog waste and of trash receptacles at the dog park would facilitate compliance with Municipal Code Section 7.20.020. Thus, the dog park is not expected to result in any significant impacts in relation to odor from pet waste. The Project site is not anticipated to introduce any other objectionable odors. Chambers Group, Inc. 81 21169 21-119 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beoch, California There are no traffic trip rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual for dog parks. To determine the potential trips associated with a dog park, a comparison to a similar dog park in Laguna Beach was reviewed. The dog park in Laguna Beach is 2.5 acres in size and generates 480 trips per day. By comparison, the proposed 0.2-0.3 acre dog park would generate approximately 38 trips per day. Per the City Traffic Phasing Ordinance, a traffic impact study is required when there are more than 300 trips per day generated by a project. Given the estimated trips, it was determined that there is less than significant impact with the dog park portion of the Project. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.14.1 Impact a) the proposed Project, including the dog park, would not indirectly induce population growth and is intended to serve the existing population in the area. No roadways, transit, or bicycle lanes would be significantly modified as a result of the proposed Project and therefore, would not conflict with applicable circulation plans. As discussed in Section 4.17.1 Impact a) of the MND, the proposed Project would not result in a substantial increase of users that would generate a significant increase in traffic because no construction of businesses or residences would occur and no expansion of park facilities other than the small dog park are proposed. Response to Comment 14-4: As noted in the Draft IS/MND, the proposed Project will not include any elements that obstruct views. Response to Comment 14-5: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Chambers Group, Inc. 82 21169 21-120 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #15 — Wendy Kaiser COMMENT LETTER#15 From: Wendy Kaiser <wendyhkaiser@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 4:15 AM To: Tran, Andy Cc: Wemail Subject: Dog Park and Development at Superior and PCH Hi - I am opposed to a dog park in this location. It is too small of a space, too close to residences, and Comment Villa Balboa complex has decades of history of no dogs. Many of us moved here because we are 15-1 allergic or have asthma or other reasons for not wishing to be around dogs. There are a few Comment service/companion dogs only at Villa Balboa. 15-2 It would make more sense to locate the dog park near the planned playing fields on the far side (other side of Superior) toward Huntington Beach (spaced also away from Newport Crest). It Comment would also be better to locate parking by the existing community center on 15th Street and 15-3 connect it up to the playing field area. I do not see a need to have a bridge over Superior or further development or grading of Superior at PCH at this time. Comment 15-4 Please forward my email to the pertinent committee and the city council. Thank you. Wendy Kaiser wendvhkaiser(@.vahoo.com 270 Cagney Ln #115 Newport Beach Ca 92663 949-202-7273 Sent from my iPad Sent from my iPhone Chambers Group, Inc. � � 83 21169 21-121 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #15 — Wendy Kaiser Response to Comment 15-1: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Response to Comment 15-2: This comment has been noted. The proposed dog park is located downslope of the adjacent residential communities, As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.3.3, the design of the proposed 0.2-0.3 acre dog park includes the installation of 6 -foot tall fences, enclosing the dog park and separating large and small dogs, thus clearly designating a space, specifically catered towards dogs and the pet owners. Installation of the fences would prevent dogs from exiting the designated park area and prevent dogs from entering any private properties or public roadways. Response to Comment 15-3: The purpose of the proposed Project is a construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue that would connect Sunset Ridge Park to the Superior Parking Lot at the intersection of West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. The objectives of the project are: • To improve safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. • To provide additional parking spaces to better serve both passive uses and organized sporting events (mostly youth) at Sunset Ridge Park in an area where parking is limited. • To reduce traffic signal wait times by shifting pedestrian and bicycle traffic from the at -grade crosswalk to the bridge. • To expand recreational options in this part of the City by developing a small dog park just below Sunset View Park, adjacent to the expanded parking lot. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.2 Project Purpose and Objectives, the Proposed Project aids in improving safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. This is an improvement from the present conditions where pedestrians and bicyclists typically cross the busy, major arterial roadways, West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue, to reach Sunset Ridge Park. Response to Comment 15-4: Comment noted. Please refer to Response to Comment 15-3. Chambers Group, Inc. 84 21169 21-122 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #16 — Sudhir Banker COMMENT LETTER#16 From: Rajeshbanker <bankerfmly@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 201912:34 PM To: Dixon, Diane; Dept - City Council; Tran, Andy; Detweiler, Laura; Levin, Sean Cc: Darby Ryan #313 Hoa Subject: DOG PARK/PARKING EXPANSION next to Sunset Ridge park Attachments: DOG PARKPARKING EXPANSION.pdf Honorable. Mayor Diane,respected city council members, city engineer and staff at large: As a resident of Villa Balboa community of 449 mostly senior householders, please review our attached letter and following and consider and approve Our request: Comment -We are totally against the proposed Dog Park.This is immediately adjacent to our building (200 Paris Lane) with 54 16-1 homes and our Villa Balboa complex of 449 homes, as well as, next to Hoag Hospital Property. - This was thrusted and forced upon us by a stroke of a pencil on map ,immediately adjacent to our community of 449 units residents Villa Balboa (with no Dogs policy for 40 years)and practically placed into our front yard .There is no buffer zone,period. This will have perhaps unintentional but severe adverse consequences to health, quiet and peaceful enjoyment by our community, as well as, annually more than 25,000 visiting peoGmail.comple , including Comment Hoag staff and patients in wheel chairs, enjoying daily walks, meditation, playing with children and most 16-2 importantly enjoying fresh ocean breezes and fantastic sunrise and sunsets in a quiet and peaceful environment, etc... -Sunset View park ,a tiny park, only a block away from ocean, was named and created for enjoyment by public to enjoy fresh ocean breezes ,Fantastic sunsets, fireworks,air showboat race in a very Quiet peaceful environment with loved ones. Instead, adjacent proposed dog park will bring lot of unhealthy air with foul smell and lots of barking noise pollution Comment and create a very unsafe location for dogs, people and traffic in and out and slow down or block emergency vehicle 16-3 traffic on Superior to and from Hoag. -Noise pollution of loud barking smell,unhealthy air conditions (replacing refreshing clean ocean breezes)from my and surrounding units will be unacceptable and any "study" city puts it in question. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST: - We consider you all , city fathers, as parents, using your wisdom and long range thinking To protect and Comment enhance the interests and rights of us public for quiet, peaceful Enjoyment for generations to come. 16-4 - The land for proposed dog park is very precious and unique real estate and should be used for the benefit Of people FIRST. - Suggest, let us create something very valuable for our many generations to come By increasing the size of tiny Sunset View Park and provide more green space for Meditation, excercise circuit, playing with children, mini picnics, enjoying Comment Refreshing clean ocean air breezes ,Fabulous sunsets ,fireworks,boat and air shows in a quiet peacefid 16-5 way- -relocate proposed dog park to a huge SUNSET RIDGE Park right across With lot of idle land with buffer zone and near the community where HOA has dogs Comment Accepted policy. 16-6 -Concurrently, in addition to reallocating the land for dog park to Sunset View Comment 16-7 Chambers Group, Inc. 85 21169 21-123 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment 16-7 Contd. Park,Reallocate land for additional parking,to expand the tiny Sunset View Park With more green area for ever increasing and growing need for public use above. (ARE YOU AWARE OF HOMELESS TENT WITH LOTS OF TRASH IN THE EXISTING Comment PARKING LOT WITH ABUSIVE USE OF BUSHES AND TREES IN ADJOINING 16-8 HOAG HOSPITAL FOR DAILY SANITARY NEEDS?) I must mention that WE LOVE DOGS, especially we spend fun time with two dogs Buboo nearby And Lolla our sons have . THIS IS NOT APPROPRIATE LOCATION FOR DOG PARK, PLEASE. WISH YOU WOULD HAVE PLANNED THE MEETING ON 15th October at SUNSET VIEW PARK, IN Comment ORDER TO GET FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE OF THE ISSUES ON HAND. 16-9 RESPECTFULLY, SudhirBanker OWNER: 200 Paris Lane #313 Newport Beach CA 92663 Phone: 818-694-1777 Email: banke[fi&@aol.com Sent from my iPad Chambers Group, Inc. a �m 86 21169 21-124 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California --URGENT AND IMPORTANT"-°-- '— Laura Detweiler Recreation & Senior Services Director i_Det,.eilera ger ,_,rtteac^c3_cnv CC: lflla Balboa Home Owner's Association CIO Ryan Darby RDarby4action life.com SUBJECT: URGENT - Please STOP and defer ALL decisions on your PUE and consider and approve our request. Clear Ms. Detweiler: I received notice of an August 6 meeting regarding the proposed dog part not be able to attend that meeting. As a resident of Villa Balboa community of 449 householders, please revic request as follows, o Move dog park to Newport Crest side in huge park and redesignate the more, by not expanding parking and use that same allocated land for make that bigger green lawn,as green lawn area for the benefit of our immediately adjoining communities of our 449 householders of householders of 5cultz , currently with disproportionately very little and LOPSIDED VERY LOW allocation of land for us compare where there is a HUGE PARK, baseball playground,children's playgroui rest rooms. walking and bicycle path, huge general purpose playground and with green belt, very large undE idle land, etc. etc._. o I want to go on record with you and the HOA in opposing the dog park. germs do travel and as we in adjoining 200 Paris building are directly u it will most canto my impact our day to day environment. Any environrrzi doesn't recreate the dog barking (which you can clearly hear as you drii Newport Beach's existing dog park) and noise, smell, and air quality cc from my unit will be unacceptable and call any 'study" city put it into o. For its entire 40 Year existence Villa Balboa has prohibited does, basis for many residents to purchase homes there. The HOA Boy considerable length to NOT modify any regulations as this would grandfathered "no dogs" regulation. IN contrast, Across Superior, considerably more space, Newport Crest does allow dogs. In fac research 1 was unable to find any other dog park in our area (I loc earth) that did not have a material buffer zone between the dog p residence. In this Case the proposed dog park is immediately adjc NOTICE Superior. I will and address cur an -to land and, irking expansion to Ila Balboa and 230 to Newport Crest, Sounds, smells, and wind from the park, ital study that 3 by editions uestion. 'his has been the J has gone to �opardize this here there is after considerable ✓d at 10 on google k and any ent to our building Comment 16-10 Comment 16-11 Comment 16-12 Chambers Group, Inc. 87 21164 21-125 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California (200 Paris Lane) with 54 homes and our Villa Balboa complex well as,next to a hospital property. a. It is my understanding that Villa Baiboa homeowners who have em medically prescribed dogs attended a Villa Balboa HOA rneQtineq re of adding a bridge did so as they look forward to walking their dog already exists across the street in front of NEWPORT CREST Sincarei SUUHIR � A14 R Owner: 2GO Paris Lane #313 Newport Beach, CA. 926163 Contact Information: Mailing address-. 10132 Wystone ave Northridge,ca 91324 Phone: 818 694 17T7 Email: bankerfmlyeaol.com Chambers Group, Inc. 21169 448 homes.as I supportor other �g the agenda itemComment HUGE park that 16-13 M 21-126 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California CITY 0FNRWP0RTBFACH 11ark-s. i3(: laches & ttecrcm i ion ccimM],s-,jon tuesday,,.Augum 6, -20iq —6pin City Qoiincfl Cha inju.m:, — 100 Citic CEM t(�37 D M-'7ie Nowliort Beach, CA z)-,aMo PUBLIC NOUCE Design The Lower Sulstl lew Park conceptual design ln• eludes P nwa ped eE trian and bicycle bridge wross Su- perior Avenue, add[ ional parking er4 a small dog park. The project Ls lowtE d on the nod, We iof 10jest Coast U,, Highmay at the Slip rp horAvanuO intersecticro. The in- F«tent of this rp r�'protect i� to imprDwe pedesinan saffety and access the Sunset Ridge Park ftin Sunset 106tv Park. Pub-fiC 'A'DrIcs staff 1bc-1 presenting the leading corr- C. '00ptual design to "JiParks, 2eaches & Recreation, i'PMR) Commissiol 1. X P Please join us to sh re yofir thou his. 9 For more information, please call the Recreation Office at 949- 44-3158- if you are un4bls to attend the meeting but would like to provide comments to the Commission, please email or'* b, il--"-�-;:-'� -R� I On - Chambers Group, Inc. 89 21169 21-127 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #16 — Sudhir Banker Response to Comment 16-1: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Response to Comment 16-2: The southwest edge of Sunset View Park will block the line -of -sight between the proposed Dog Park and the Villa Balboa Condos. In fact the proposed dog park will be located more than 20 feet lower than the elevation at Sunset View Park. Since sound travels in straight lines, the southwest edge of Sunset View Park will effectively act like a 20 foot high sound wall between the proposed dog park and the condos. As such, only nominal construction noise impacts are anticipated to occur from the proposed project at the Villa Balboa Condos and no operational noise impacts from the proposed dog park or any other noise sources are anticipated to occur at the Villa Balboa Condos. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.13.2 Impact a) the noise from the proposed dog park, from both dogs barking and dog -owners talking, would be well below (at least 30 dB below) ambient noise levels. Noise is only additive if the noise source is within 10 dB of ambient noise levels. Since noise from the proposed dog park would be at least 30 dB below ambient noise levels, it would not provide a quantitative contribution to existing ambient noise levels and will not be discernible at the nearby homes. A noise study was conducted for the Proposed Project to compare noise levels for similar activities at other comparable facilities; and these noise measurements are presented in detail in Table 4-24 of the Draft IS/MND. Additionally, according to the CaIEEMod model run, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate nine or fewer additional daily trips above current conditions, which would have a negligible impact to the nearby roadway noise levels. Therefore, it has been determined that the noise levels generated at the dog park would be within the City's exterior daytime and nighttime residential noise standards. The Proposed Project would not result in a significant impact to the nearest homes in the vicinity of the Project. Response to Comment 16-3: Please refer to Response to Comment 16-2. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.3.3 Impact d) a regular maintenance schedule, including proper handling and removal of pet waste will be established to prevent accumulation of dog waste at the park thus preventing the generation of odor. Additionally, as part of the design, the dog park would include conveniently -sited waste receptacles away from residences, and provision of waste bags for owners' use. In addition, with the use of synthetic turf specifically designed for dog parks, the ease of cleaning and maintenance is increased. The appropriate disposal of dog waste onsite would minimize odors perceptible to people. Pursuant to Section 7.20.020 of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code, it is unlawful for a person in charge of any animal "to permit such animal to defecate and to allow the feces to thereafter remain on any public sidewalk, public beach or park or on any other public property or on any private property other than that Chambers Group, Inc. 90 21169 21-128 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking lot Project Newport Beach, California of the owner..." The Project's provision and maintenance of bags for the disposal of dog waste and of trash receptacles at the dog park would facilitate compliance with Municipal Code Section 7.20.020. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.2 Project Purpose and Objectives, the Proposed Project aids in improving safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. This is an improvement from the present conditions where pedestrians and bicyclists typically cross the busy, major arterial roadways, West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue, to reach Sunset Ridge Park. The development of the proposed bridge would also result in a beneficial impact related to emergency response because the bridge would provide increased safety and direct access from the parking lot to Sunset Ridge Park. For pedestrians traveling along the eastern sidewalk along Superior Avenue, the access point to the parking lot would remain in the same location, therefore the Project would not result in a change in traffic patterns over what is already expected along the roadway. Response to Comment 16-4: Comment noted. Response to Comment 16-5: Comment noted. Response to Comment 16-6: Comment noted. Response to Comment 16-7: Comment noted. Dog park relocation is outside the scope of CEQA analysis; however, the City Council will consider public review comments in their review of the Project and CEQA document. Response to Comment 16-8: Park hours will be enforced per the Municipal Code. Response to Comment 16-9: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Response to Comment 16-10: Dog park relocation is outside the scope of CEQA analysis; however, the City Council will consider public review comments in their review of the Project and CEQA document. Response to Comment 16-11: Chambers Group, Inc. 91 21169 21-129 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beoch, California As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.13.2 Impact a) the noise from the proposed dog park, from both dogs barking and dog -owners talking, would be well below (at least 30 dB below) ambient noise levels. Noise is only additive if the noise source is within 10 dB of ambient noise levels. Since noise from the proposed dog park would be at least 30 dB below ambient noise levels, it would not provide a quantitative contribution to existing ambient noise levels and will not be discernible at the nearby homes. A noise study was conducted for the Proposed Project to compare noise levels for similar activities at other comparable facilities; and these noise measurements are presented in detail in Table 4-24 of the Draft IS/MND. Additionally, according to the CalEEMod model run, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate nine or fewer additional daily trips above current conditions, which would have a negligible impact to the nearby roadway noise levels. Therefore, it has been determined that the noise levels generated at the dog park would be within the City's exterior daytime and nighttime residential noise standards. The Proposed Project would not result in a significant impact to the nearest homes in the vicinity of the Project. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.3.3 Impact d) a regular maintenance schedule, including proper handling and removal of pet waste will be established to prevent accumulation of dog waste at the park thus preventing the generation of odor. Additionally, as part of the design, the dog park would include conveniently -sited waste receptacles away from residences, and provision of waste bags for owners' use. In addition, with the use of synthetic turf specifically designed for dog parks, the ease of cleaning and maintenance is increased. The appropriate disposal of dog waste onsite would minimize odors perceptible to people. Pursuant to Section 7.20.020 of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code, it is unlawful for a person in charge of any animal "to permit such animal to defecate and to allow the feces to thereafter remain on any public sidewalk, public beach or park or on any other public property or on any private property other than that of the owner..." The Project's provision and maintenance of bags for the disposal of dog waste and of trash receptacles at the dog park would facilitate compliance with Municipal Code Section 7.20.020. Thus, the dog park is not expected to result in any significant impacts in relation to odor from pet waste. The Project site is not anticipated to introduce any other objectionable odors. Response to Comment 16-12: The proposed dog park is located 50 feet downslope and approximately 220 feet away from the Villa Balboa community. Dog park design and proximity to specific communities is outside the scope of CEQA analysis; however, the City Council will consider public review comments in their review of the Project and CEQA document. Response to Comment 16-13: Please refer to Response to Comment 16-12. Chambers Group, Inc. 92 21169 21-130 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #17 —Ryan Darby COMMENT LETTER #17 From: Tran, Andy Sent: Friday, October 18, 201911:19 AM To: 'Ryan Darby' Cc: Carleen Subject: RE: Ambient Noise Hi Ryan, Since this is a question on our environmental document (MND) and we are currently in our 30 -day public review period, I will have our environmental consultant prepare a formal written response to your question at the end of the review period. This is standard California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) procedure. With that said, Table 4-21 of the MND does list existing noise levels at the 3 locations. I would also suggest reviewing Appendix H. Hope this helps. Andy Tran, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: 949-644-3315 From: Ryan Darby<rdarby@action[ife.com> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 7:58 AM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.eov> Cc: Carleen <challstead@aol.com> Subject: Ambient Noise Hello Andy, I went through the Noise Report and I see where it says it is only an additive if the noise source is within 10 dB of ambient noise levels, however I don't see where it lists what the ambient noise levels are at Comment Villa Balboa and that there weren't any tests done on the property like we do for Hoag Hospital to 17-1 obtain those noise levels. Can you let me know what they found the ambient noise level to be? The point that I was trying to bring up at the meeting is that the noise levels at Villa Balboa is already significantly higher than most of the rest of Newport Beach with the Co -Gen Plant, PCH and Superior. Comment The dog park, would be raising an already elevated ambient noise level for the residents. 17-2 Chambers Group, Inc. 93 21169 21-131 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California V-"t�4ryN ACTION PR4PCRTY MANAG5M�N'1 RYAN DARBY I COMMUNITY MANAGER ACTION PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 2603 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500, IRVINE, CA 92614 OFFICE 1 (949) 450-0202 WEBSITE I WARD I RDARBY(&ACTIONLIFE.COM rf d * *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message is intended to be viewed only by the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or you receive this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete the original message and any copies of it from your computer system.** **For further information about Action Property Management, please see our website at www.actionlife.com or refer to any of our offices. Thank you.** Chambers Group, Inc. 94 21169 21-132 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #17 — Ryan Darby Response to Comment 17-1: Thank you for your comment. Appendix Hof the Draft IS/MND provides the noise measurement printouts and a photo index of the noise measurement locations. The noise measurement locations were selected in order to obtain the ambient noise measurements at the locations that would experience the greatest noise increase from construction and/or operation of the proposed Project. No noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the Villa Balboa Condos, since the grade is relatively flat in the Sunset View Park area that covers the nearest 200 feet to the Villa Balboa Condos and then there is a steep slope to the Project site. The southwest edge of Sunset View Park will block the line -of -sight between the proposed Dog Park and the Villa Balboa Condos. In fact the proposed dog park will be located more than 20 feet lower than the elevation at Sunset View Park. Since sound travels in straight lines, the southwest edge of Sunset View Park will effectively act like a 20 foot high sound wall between the proposed dog park and the condos. As such, only nominal construction noise impacts are anticipated to occur from the proposed project at the Villa Balboa Condos and no operational noise impacts from the proposed dog park or any other noise sources are anticipated to occur at the Villa Balboa Condos. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.13.2 Impact a) the noise from the proposed dog park, from both dogs barking and dog -owners talking, would be well below (at least 30 dB below) ambient noise levels. Noise is only additive if the noise source is within 10 dB of ambient noise levels. Since noise from the proposed dog park would be at least 30 dB below ambient noise levels, it would not provide a quantitative contribution to existing ambient noise levels and will not be discernible at the nearby homes. A noise study was conducted for the Proposed Project to compare noise levels for similar activities at other comparable facilities; and these noise measurements are presented in detail in Table 4-24 of the Draft IS/MND. Additionally, according to the CaIEEMod model run, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate nine or fewer additional daily trips above current conditions, which would have a negligible impact to the nearby roadway noise levels. Therefore, it has been determined that the noise levels generated at the dog park would be within the City's exterior daytime and nighttime residential noise standards. The Proposed Project would not result in a significant impact to the nearest homes in the vicinity of the Project. Response to Comment 17-2: Please refer to Response to Comment 17-1. Chambers Group, Inc. 95 21169 21-133 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #18 — Ryan Darby COMMENT LETTER #18 From: Tran, Andy Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 12:47 PM To: 'Ryan Darby' Cc: Carleen Subject: RE: Ambient Noise I will forward your following question to the environmental consultant. Thanks, Andy From: Ryan Darby<rdarby@actionlife.com> Sent: Friday, October 18, 201912:34 PM To: Tran, Andy<ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Cc: Carleen <challstead@aol.com> Subject: RE: Ambient Noise Hello Andy, The three locations are not by Villa Balboa though. 1ST location is on PCH. 2nd location is on PCH and Superior. Comment 3rd location is the park on the other side of Superior. 18-1 If I could get a response stating how the ambient noise level stated in the report was within 10 dB of the current ambient noise dB. Thanks! From: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Sent: Friday, October 18, 201911:19 AM To: Ryan Darby <rdarby@actionlife.com> Cc: Carleen <challstead@aol.com> Subject: RE: Ambient Noise RYAN DARBY I COMMUNITY MANAGER ACTION PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 2603 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500, IRVINE, CA 92614 OFFICE 1 (949) 450-0202 WEBSITE I WARD I RDARBYCaIACTIONLIFE.COM Hi Ryan, Chambers Group, Inc. 9E 21169 21-134 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Since this is a question on our environmental document (MND) and we are currently in our 30 -day public review period, I will have our environmental consultant prepare a formal written response to your question at the end of the review period. This is standard California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) procedure. With that said, Table 4-21 of the MND does list existing noise levels at the 3 locations. I would also suggest reviewing Appendix H. Hope this helps. Andy Tran, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: 949-644-3315 From: Ryan Darby<rdarby@actionlife.com> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 7:58 AM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Cc: Carleen <challstead@aol.com> Subject: Ambient Noise Hello Andy, went through the Noise Report and I see where it says it is only an additive if the noise source is within 10 dB of ambient noise levels, however I don't see where it lists what the ambient noise levels are at Villa Balboa and that there weren't any tests done on the property like we do for Hoag Hospital to obtain those noise levels. Can you let me know what they found the ambient noise level to be? The point that I was trying to bring up at the meeting is that the noise levels at Villa Balboa is already significantly higher than most of the rest of Newport Beach with the Co -Gen Plant, PCH and Superior. The dog park, would be raising an already elevated ambient noise level for the residents. y T ! i e ACTIwN PRO11C11TY MfANAGrMtNT w RYAN DARBY I COMMUNITY MANAGER ACTION PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 2603 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500, IRVINE, CA 92614 OFFICE 1 (949) 450-0202 WEBSITE I VCARD I RDARBY@ACTIONLIFE.COM Chambers Group, Inc. 97 21169 21-135 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #18 — Ryan Darby Response to Comment 18-1: Thank you for your comment. As described in Section 4.13.1 of the Draft IS/MND, long-term (24-hour) noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the proposed Project. Results of the noise level measurements are presented in Table 4- 21 and the noise measurement printouts and photos of the noise measurements sites are provided in Appendix H. The noise measurement locations were selected in order to obtain the ambient noise measurements at the locations that would experience the greatest noise increase from construction and/or operation of the proposed Project. No noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the Villa Balboa Condos, since the grade is relatively flat in the Sunset View Park area that covers the nearest 200 feet to the Villa Balboa Condos and then there is a steep slope to the Project site. The Southwest edge of Sunset View Park will block the line -of -sight between the proposed dog park and the Villa Balboa Condos. In fact the proposed dog park will be located more than 20 feet lower than the elevation at Sunset View Park. Since sound travels in straight lines, the southwest edge of Sunset View Park will effectively acts like a 20 foot high sound wall between the proposed dog park and the condos. As such, only nominal construction noise impacts are anticipated to occur from the proposed Project at the Villa Balboa Condos and no operational noise impacts from the proposed dog park or any other noise sources are anticipated to occur at the Villa Balboa Condos. Chambers Group, Inc. 98 21169 21-136 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #19 — Sudhir Banker COMMENT LETTER #19 From: Sudhir Banker <bankerfmly@aol.com> Sent: Friday, October 18, 201912:34 PM To: Dixon, Diane; Dept - City Council; Tran, Andy; Detweiler, Laura; Levin, Sean Cc: Darby Ryan #313 Hoa Subject: Re: DOG PARK/PARKING EXPANSION next to Sunset Ridge park Honarable Mayor Diane, respected city council, Mr.Tran, Ms.Detweiler and all staff Thank u very much for giving myself and all of us at Villa Balboa to giving us opportunity to meet with u all at dog park and listen and hear us about: Comment -Our very strong objection to placement of Dog Park right in our front yard for specific reasons our 19-1 request to place it totally somewhere else. - SUNSET VIEW PARK IS SUCH A UNIQUE PARK, A MOST EXPENSIVE PIECE OF REAL ESTATE ,WHERE ANNUALLY MORE THAN 25000 People from our property of 459 units, HOAG staff and patients, Comment neighboring residents and local and out of city/state 'Visitors'to enjoy incredible Ocean views, fresh 19-2 ocean breezes and unmatched Sunsets !!!! -PLEASE DONOT PLACEI Comment DOG PARK AND INSTEAD USE SAME LAND TO EXPAND SUNSET VIEW PARK. 19-3 -LEAVE A LEGACY FOR GENERATIONS TO COME AND GET COMPLIMENTS TO CITY OFFICIALS AND BLESSINGS FROM ALL FOR GIVING MORE GREEN SPACE FOR PUBLIC USE. Comment 19-4 Hoping to hear from you and staff a very favorable decision . Respectfully, Sudhir Banker 8186941777 cel I 200 Paris lane #313 Newport Beach Ca 92663 Sent from my iPhone >On Oct 15, 2019, at 12:33 PM, Rajeshbanker <bankerfmly@aol.com> wrote: >Honorable. Mayor Diane,respected city council members, city engineer and staff at large: >As a resident of Villa Balboa community of 449 mostly senior householders, please review our attached letter and following and consider and approve Our request: Chambers Group, Inc. 99 21169 21-137 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California >-We are totally against the proposed Dog Park.This is immediately >adjacent to our building (200 Paris Lane) with 54 homes and our Villa Balboa complex of 449 homes, as well as, next to Hoag Hospital Property. >- This was thrusted and forced upon us by a stroke of a pencil on map ,immediately adjacent to our community of 449 units residents Villa Balboa (with no Dogs policy for 40 years)and practically placed into our front yard .There is no buffer zone,period. This will have perhaps unintentional but severe adverse consequences to health, quiet and peaceful enjoyment by our community, as well as, annually more than 25,000 visiting peoGmail.comple , including Hoag staff and patients in wheel chairs, enjoying daily walks, meditation, playing with children and most importantly enjoying fresh ocean breezes and fantastic sunrise and sunsets in a quiet and peaceful environment, etc... >-Sunset View park,a tiny park, only a block away from ocean, was named and created for enjoyment by public to enjoy fresh ocean breezes, Fantastic sunsets, fireworks,airshow,boat race in a very Quiet,peaceful environment with loved ones. >Instead, adjacent proposed dog park will bring lot of unhealthy air with foul smell and lots of barking noise pollution and create a very unsafe location for dogs, people and traffic in and out and slow down or block emergency vehicle traffic on Superior to and from Hoag. >-Noise pollution of loud barking,smell,unhealthy air conditions (replacing refreshing clean ocean breezes)from my and surrounding units will be unacceptable and any "study" city puts it in question. > WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST: > - We consider you all , city fathers, as parents, using your wisdom and long range thinking To protect and enhance the interests and rights of us public for quiet, peaceful Enjoyment for generations to come. >- The land for proposed dog park is very precious and unique real estate and should be used for the benefit Of people FIRST. > - Suggest, let us create something very valuable for our many generations to come > By increasing the size of tiny Sunset View Park and provide more green space for > Meditation, excercise circuit, playing with children, mini picnics, enjoying > Refreshing clean ocean air breezes,Fabulous sunsets ,fireworks, boat and air shows in a quiet peaceful way. > -relocate proposed dog park to a huge SUNSET RIDGE Park right across > With lot of idle land with buffer zone and near the community where HOA has dogs > Accepted policy. > -Concurrently, in addition to reallocating the land for dog park to Sunset View > Park,Reallocate land for additional parking,to expand the tiny Sunset View Park > With more green area forever increasing and growing need for public use above. > (ARE YOU AWARE OF HOMELESS TENT WITH LOTS OF TRASH IN THE EXISTING > PARKING LOT WITH ABUSIVE USE OF BUSHES AND TREES IN ADJOINING HOAG HOSPITAL FOR DAILY SANITARY NEEDS?) Chambers Group, Inc. 100 21169 21-138 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California >1 must mention that WE LOVE DOGS, especially we spend fun time with two dogs Buboo nearby And Lolla our sons have . > THIS IS NOT APPROPRIATE LOCATION FOR DOG PARK, PLEASE. >WISH YOU WOULD HAVE PLANNED THE MEETING ON 15th October at SUNSET VIEW PARK, IN ORDER TO GET FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE OF THE ISSUES ON HAND. > RESPECTFULLY, > Sudhir Banker > OWNER: > 200 Paris Lane #313 > Newport Beach CA 92663 > Phone: 818-694-1777 > Email: bankerfmly@aol.com > <DOG PARK > Sent from my iPad Chambers Group, Inc. 101 21159 21-139 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #19 — Sudhir Banker Response to Comment 19-1: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Response to Comment 19-2: Comment noted. Response to Comment 19-3: The purpose of the proposed Project is a construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue that would connect Sunset Ridge Park to the Superior Parking Lot at the intersection of West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. The objectives of the project are: • To improve safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. • To provide additional parking spaces to better serve both passive uses and organized sporting events (mostly youth) at Sunset Ridge Park in an area where parking is limited. • To reduce traffic signal wait times by shifting pedestrian and bicycle traffic from the at -grade crosswalk to the bridge. • To expand recreational options in this part of the City by developing a small dog park just below Sunset View Park, adjacent to the expanded parking lot. Response to Comment 19-4: Comment noted. Chambers Group, Inc. 102 21169 21-140 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #20 — City of Irvine COMMENT LETTER #20 -4OFf4L i 0 fi Community Development 1 Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, CA 92606-5208 October 21, 2019 Mr. Andy Tran City of Newport Beach Public Works Department 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 cityofirvine.org 949-724-6000 Subject: Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project in the City of Newport Beach Dear Mr. Tran: City of Irvine staff is in receipt of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project in the City of Newport Beach. The project is adjacent to Sunset Ride Park and Sunset View Park, and approximately 1,000 feet away from the coastline. The project proposes a new pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue, a 3.4 acre dog park, and a parking lot expansion. The Comment project is intended to facilitate movement for pedestrians and bicyclists across Superior 20-1 Avenue and provide more parking opportunities for Sunset Ridge Park. Staff reviewed the project and has no comments. If you have any questions, you may contact me at 949-724-6364 or by email at 4equina cityofirvine.orcl S'ncerely, Jus I uina ociate Planner cc: Kerwin Lau, Manager of Planning Services Marika Poynter, Principal Planner Chambers Group, Inc. 103 21169 21-141 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #20 — City of Irvine Response to Comment 20-1: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Chambers Group, Inc. 104 21169 21-142 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #21— Barry Macpherson COMMENT LETTER #21 To: Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer, City of Newport Beach, Public Works 10/21/19 Dear Mr. Tran, am a long time resident of Newport Beach, California. I have lived at Newport Crest for the past thirty years. I use Sunset Ridge Park on a daily basis. As you are aware the Sunset Ridge Park was originally conceived as a "passive" park for visitors to enjoy walking trails and views from the park. The baseball diamond and soccer field was added as an adjunct at the behest of the Newport Beach Parks and Recreation Department. Currently, Sunset Ridge Park is being used exactly as intended. Visitors come from surrounding communities to enjoy the views, walk the trails, walk their dogs and use the recreational facilities. Adults and youths involved in competitive sports use the park. Sunset Ridge Park and Sunset View Park are perfect just the way are now. There is absolutely no need to expand the parking lot, construct a new dog park or build a pedestrian bridge. This project will be a huge cost to the taxpayer. The Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project is a solution looking for a problem. There is no problem. The Project should be opposed for a number of reasons, some of which include the following: 1. A major reason to oppose this proposed Project is the cost. There is no need to spend five million or more dollars of taxpayer funds on this Project. It does not Comment 21-1 matter if the money is local, state or federal. It is still taxpayer funds. 2. The parking lot below Sunset View Park has 64 parking spaces and does NOT need to be enlarged or modified. The current parking lot is never full and infrequently used. The only time the lot is full is on the Fourth of July and Labor Comment Day. When there are sporting events at Sunset Ridge Park the lot is not full. Many 21-2 of the parents who have youth playing at sporting events drop their youths off and do not park in the lot. 3. There is no need to build a .3 acre dog park. Currently, there is ample opportunity for visitors at both Sunset Ridge Park and Sunset View Park to walk their dogs. Any visitor to Sunset Ridge Park and Sunset View Park will see a number of visitors Comment walking their dog(s) and enjoying the park. Visitors do not typically drive to a park 21-3 to walk their dog. They walk from surrounding neighborhoods with their dog to the park. 4. The proposed Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge is not needed. The proposed bridge is not needed because it will not significantly decrease the time to get to the park or decrease the distance to access the park from the parking lot. Comment Visitors typically walk to Sunset Ridge Park and Sunset View Park from surrounding 21-4 communities. The majority of visitors do not access Sunset Ridge Park from the parking lot. Visitors can park in the current parking lot and easily access Sunset Ridge Park via Pacific Coast Highway. Chambers Group, Inc. 105 21169 21-143 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California 5. To address the safety concerns for visitors accessing the Sunset Ridge Park from the parking lot, it is suggested that the duration of time for the signal for Comment crossing the intersection at Pacific Coast Highway and Superior Avenue be increased. 21-5 Additionally, warning lights should be embedded in the asphalt at the intersection. The lights then could be activated by a pedestrian. For a very modest cost, this would greatly improve pedestrian safety and visibility. 6.According to the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot plan, there will need to be extensive grading and earthwork which will contribute to air pollution. The elevated area at the base of Sunset View Park will be leveled. In the process of the building and completion of the dog park, native flora and vegetation will be destroyed. The existing slope that is used by many visitors to relax, view sunsets and take pictures will be destroyed. The local wildlife including squirrels, jack rabbits, cotton tail rabbits, coyotes, etc will be displaced. Protected species including the Comment coastal California gnatcatcher and burrowing owl may be affected by the Project. The 21-6 negative environmental impact resulting from this project would be irreparable. The result could include possible loss of animal life and disruption of the adjacent ecosystem. The project will significantly alter the local habitat. The addition of a dog park near Sunset View Park will increase noise pollution, light pollution, and possibly increase the spread of disease from dog feces. In summary, the City of Newport Beach should not approve a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) or approve a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot. The project is costly and Comment unnecessary. The California Costal Commission should not approve a Coastal 21-7 Development Permit Amendment for this project. Please notify me by US mail of any future public meeting regarding the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project. Sincerely yours, Barry Macpherson 15 Mojo Court Newport Beach Ca 92663 Chambers Group, Inc. 106 21169 21-144 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #21— Barry Macpherson Response to Comment 21-1: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. The cost of the Project is outside the scope of CEQA, however your comment will be included for City Council's consideration of the project. Response to Comment 21-2: The purpose of the proposed Project is a construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue that would connect Sunset Ridge Park to the Superior Parking Lot at the intersection of West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. The objectives of the project are: • To improve safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. • To provide additional parking spaces to better serve both passive uses and organized sporting events (mostly youth) at Sunset Ridge Park in an area where parking is limited. • To reduce traffic signal wait times by shifting pedestrian and bicycle traffic from the at -grade crosswalk to the bridge. • To expand recreational options in this part of the City by developing a small dog park just below Sunset View Park, adjacent to the expanded parking lot. Response to Comment 21-3: Comment noted. Please refer to Response to Comment 21-2. Response to Comment 21-4: Please refer to Response to Comment 21-2. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.2 Project Purpose and Objectives, the Proposed Project aids in improving safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. This is an improvement from the present conditions where pedestrians and bicyclists typically cross the busy, major arterial roadways, West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue, to reach Sunset Ridge Park. Response to Comment 21-5: Please refer to Response to Comment 21-4. Response to Comment 21-6: As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.3.3, the data shows that construction -related emissions would not exceed SCAQMD's local air concentration thresholds. In addition, construction emissions would be Chambers Group, Inc. 107 21169 21-145 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California short-term, limited only to the period when construction activity is taking place. As such, construction related local air concentrations would be less than significant for the proposed Project. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.13.2 Impact a) the noise from the proposed dog park, from both dogs barking and dog -owners talking, would be well below (at least 30 dB below) ambient noise levels. Noise is only additive if the noise source is within 10 dB of ambient noise levels. Since noise from the proposed dog park would be at least 30 dB below ambient noise levels, it would not provide a quantitative contribution to existing ambient noise levels and will not be discernible at the nearby homes. A noise study was conducted for the Proposed Project to compare noise levels for similar activities at other comparable facilities; and these noise measurements are presented in detail in Table 4-24 of the Draft IS/MND. Additionally, according to the CaIEEMod model run, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate nine or fewer additional daily trips above current conditions, which would have a negligible impact to the nearby roadway noise levels. Therefore, it has been determined that the noise levels generated at the dog park would be within the City's exterior daytime and nighttime residential noise standards. The Proposed Project would not result in a significant impact to the nearest homes in the vicinity of the Project. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.3.3 Impact d) a regular maintenance schedule, including proper handling and removal of pet waste will be established to prevent accumulation of dog waste at the park thus preventing the generation of odor. Additionally, as part of the design, the dog park would include conveniently -sited waste receptacles away from residences, and provision of waste bags for owners' use. In addition, with the use of synthetic turf specifically designed for dog parks, the ease of cleaning and maintenance is increased. The appropriate disposal of dog waste onsite would minimize odors perceptible to people. Pursuant to Section 7.20.020 of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code, it is unlawful for a person in charge of any animal "to permit such animal to defecate and to allow the feces to thereafter remain on any public sidewalk, public beach or park or on any other public property or on any private property other than that of the owner..." The Project's provision and maintenance of bags for the disposal of dog waste and of trash receptacles at the dog park would facilitate compliance with Municipal Code Section 7.20.020. Thus, the dog park is not expected to result in any significant impacts in relation to odor from pet waste. The Project site is not anticipated to introduce any other objectionable odors. As described in Section 4.4.1 (f) of the Draft IS/MND, the proposed Project is not located within an environmental study area and there are no potentially significant impacts anticipated to the habitats or species that have the potential to occur. In addition, avoidance and mitigation efforts would result in direct and indirect impacts to be less than significant to habitats, natural communities, and wildlife. A Biological Technical Report was prepared for the proposed Project which evaluated impacts to wildlife species including burrowing owl. In addition, a coastal California gnatcatcher protocol level survey was performed to evaluate potential impacts to this sensitive species. Based on these reports, mitigation measures were provided to reduce potential impacts to nesting birds, wetlands, and sensitive plant species, as outlined in mitigation measures MM BIO -1 through MM BIO -5. With implementation of these mitigation measures, impacts would be reduced to less than significant. Response to Comment 21-7: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Chambers Group, Inc. 108 21169 21-146 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #22 — Deborah Gero COMMENT LETTER #22 Andy Tran, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA. 92660 October 22, 2019 Deborah A. Gero 1341 Berea Place Pacific Palisades, CA. 90272 Owner of: 200 Paris Lane 112 Newport Beach, CA 93663 debigero(apmail.com RE: Draft/Initial Study/Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Andy: I would like to take you up on your offer to submit questions that I have regarding the above report. My questions are from the perspective of the closest building at Villa Balboa (200 Paris Lane) to the dog park and from the perspective of Sunset View Park, which will be immediately adjacent to the dog park, as I have had the occasion to make personal observations and see preferences from many others in the community who currently use and appreciate Sunset View Park. When I use the word "City", I am referring broadly to the City of Newport Beach, which would include all departments, such as Recreation and Senior Services. Generally: Distance from the proposed dog park to nearest homes: What is an official and accurate measure of the closest distance of the nearest Villa Balboa unit to the dog park? It looks like three different measures used for how close residents are to the Comment dog park. On page 52, it states that residents in the northeast are 220 feet away, page 105 22-1 states that they are 260 feet away, and the presentation dated August 6, 2019 titled "Lover Sunset View Park Conceptual Design" indicates that the distance is 250 feet. Measurement points for the study: Why were there no measurement points at Sunset View Park and Villa Balboa in the proximity Comment of the project? 22.2 For a multi story residence, should there be measurement points at various heights? Even with the existing measurement points, why doesn't the City feel that the area is over the noise limit for residential already, when the closest measuring point to the residential Villa Comment Balboa complex measuring 67.0 (dBA Leq) (Table 4-21)? 22.3 Chambers Group, Inc. Page 1 of 5 109 21169 21-147 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Visitors to the parking lot and dog park: What has the City (not Chambers but the City) assumed (increased daily visits) for: Usage of the parking lot in order to justify the spend? The dog park? Does the City plan to increase scheduled activities at Sunset Ridge Park? How do Chamber's assumptions on usage compare to the City's? What's not in the report: Why is there is no reference to the traffic record on the stretch of Superior Blvd., particularly the side of the road where traffic heads inland from PCH to Ticonderoga? How would the development impact the safety record? Why is there no assessment of the City's current enforcement of leash laws or rules at the existing dog park? Comment 22-4 Comment 22-5 Comment 22-6 Comment 22-7 Was there a survey taken of the sentiment toward a dog park of the immediately adjacent 450 Comment home Villa Balboa Community? 22-8 Was the fact the Villa Balboa community has been a "no dog" community for forty (40) years Comment considered in location selection? 22-9 Was there any survey taken of the sentiment toward a dog park of the large number of current Comment users of Sunset View Park (ex. Those who aggregate in the evening?) 1 22-10 Specifically: 4.1 Aesthetics —Why weren't any photos taken from Sunset View Park? This park will now look directly Comment down on the dog park. 22-11 — Why hadn't the City previously maintained "large mound of dirt"? Comment 22-12 —Why wasn't it acknowledged that the "large mound of dirt" offers the best views in the area Comment and has functioned as a de facto extension of Sunset View Park? 22-13 — Lighting Comment — How will this impact Sunset View Park? 22-14 — What hours will each of the bridge, the parking lot, and the dog park be lit? Comment 22-15 Chambers Group, Inc. Page 2 o�W 21169 21-148 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California 4.3 Air Quality 22-21 On page 51, the document notes that "The proposed pedestrian bridge and parking lot are not t Comment 2-16 anticipated to create any additional vehicle trips...". —Is this the City's assumption? Comment —If beachgoers are now aware of additional parking in Superior, why would that not generate Comment additional trips on Superior? 22-17 —How does this reconcile with what is posted at newportbeachca.gov which states: "The existing parking lot only has 64 parking stalls and does not provide adequate parking for large Comment organized sporting events. The primary goals of this project are to increase parking and 22.18 improve pedestrian and bicycle safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park"? —In Section 4.16.1 on "Recreation", the document notes that the plan "The proposed Project 22'23 includes additional parking facilities for the uses of the dog park and accommodates users of Comment Sunset Park". 36 - 64 new spaces noted on page 6 (in reference to total spaces of 100 to 128 Comment spaces): how can this not be generating more pollution and noise in the immediate area 22-19 (addressed in a subsequent section)? 22-25 —When determining additional trips for the dog. park, what hours of operation were 22-26 assumed? 6 am to dusk (as posted on the City's website), as are the hours at the existing Comment Newport Beach dog park or 6 am to 11 pm, noted on page 7 as hours that the dog park 22-20 operation would fall within, or other? 22-27 Section 4.3.3 question on page 53 regarding impact of emissions and odors of the dog park: I Comment — Can the City or Chamber site scientific analysis? 22-21 —What are the odors and biological contaminants that build up in dog parks over a day, particularly one with anticipated usage such as this one? (I assume usage is assumed to be extensive or why would the city consider spending tax dollars on building out the requisite Comment infrastructure and providing daily maintenance). consider conditions where visitors to the dog park fail to respect all the rules and appropriately considers the "Atmospheric Setting" set out 22'22 in section 4.3.2. These conditions don't seem to be considered in any way as there seems to be an assumption of perfect behavior by dog owners and the City in the Section 4.3.3. —Can the Chambers group site studies of what actually happens at dog parks regarding Comment human behavior, particularly when the dog park is not near the dog owners home (since the nearest housing doesn't allow dogs)? 22'23 —What methodology did the City use in determining use of the dog park? Does this differ Comment from Chambers Group assumptions, methodologies, and conclusion that there will be nine or fewer vehicular trips in a day to the dog park? 22-24 — Will the turf will be watered daily as noted in the report? 22-25 — Will the entire park be made out of natural turf as stated? 22-26 —The current Newport Beach dog park is closed for cleaning Wednesdays from 7 am to 9 Comment am. What is the nature of this cleaning and how does it differ from the daily cleaning? 22-27 4.11. Land Uses and Planning Comment 22-28 —Why isn't the impact on Sunset View Park considered? —Why didn't the report note that the "mound of dirt" has de facto become an extension of the park, offering some of the best coastal views around? Comment —Why does the report conclude that "The uses will be consistent with what is currently 22-29 onsite" when Sunset View Park is not considered? Is this conclusion realistic if users of Comment Sunset View Park value a quiet, serene environment with fresh air and unobstructed ocean 22-30 views (currently free of fences, caged animals, and shade structures)? Chambers Group, Inc. Page 3 414 21169 21-149 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California 4.13. Noise Comment —Why wasn't at least one noise measurement taken at Villa Balboa or Sunset View Park? 22-31 —Why do you feel confident that a reading taken on the opposite side of the street and near Comment the street (based on the mislabeled photos in Appendix H) is appropriate to the places where people either live or sit (when visiting the park)? 22-32 —Why was one twenty four hour period in summer used for measurement in a highly Comment seasonal community? 22-33 —Why was the approach that uses summary data and averages deemed appropriate? Are Comment there other methods that use more detailed data? 22-34 —Did the study consider impact on sound that the change in shape, slope, and surface of the area where the dog park will be, even absent the noise generated by the dog park? Comment —The study seems to assume that ambient noise and noise from the new development is 22-35 constant when it compares the each of the new project's noise level to that of the existing Comment ambient noise. Are there other common approaches that would make different assumptions? --22-36 — How is the study for the Beverly Hills Dog Park relevant, given that it is a park that: — is located largely in a commercial area — requires registration of dogs by Beverly Hills residents and is for the use of Beverly Hills residents — requires key fob access — limits the number of dogs that can be at the park at any onetime — is a park 2 to 3 times the size of the proposed Newport Dog Park — is not in proximity to a multi family housing complex that does not allow dogs Comment — potentially has different hours than the proposed Newport Dog Park (6 am to 11 pm in 22-37 Newport Beach (unless some other hours not noted in the study are being used) vs. 6 am to 9 pm in Beverly Hills)? — has different topological considerations — Beverly Hills is flat while the proposed Newport Dog Park is up a hill? — Rincon thought another dog park study was relevant to it, which doesn't seem to be the case here? —Is there any study that shows the noise impact of a given number of barking dogs spread in various area sizes? At .2 - .3 acres, this park is substantially less than the 1 acre minimum recommendation of the National Kennel Association and the Humane Society of the United Comment States since "smaller parks may experience overcrowding problems" (found at 22-38 humanesociety.org). Comment — Does dog barking behavior change depending on the space for a given number of dogs? —According to an August 1, 2019, article in the "Whole Dog Journal: "Parks that are small, 2-39 2men overcrowded and boringgreatly Increase the likelihood of inappropriate g y � ppropriate canine behavior Comment (fights)." How was this considered for this park of this size? 22-40 —What are the range of assumptions reasonable to test for the standard attenuation rate, Comment given the topography and atmospheric conditions at the site? 22-41 —Am I reading the document correctly and we assume that the Superior Avenue measurement (Table 4-21) is a good one for the adjacent areas, at a level of 67, isn't this Comment already in excess of residential noise limits? 22-42 — What is the formula and result for adding the dog park noise to the existing noise at Comment Sunset View Park? 22-43 On page 104, there is reference to a CalEEMod estimating the trips to the dog park. Comment —On page 51, it states that they used the assumption of trips to parks of similar small size. 22-44 Why is that a reasonable assumption since a park is not a dog park? Chambers Group, Inc. 112 21169 21-150 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beoch, California Comment —What did the City of Newport Beach assume when making the decision to pursue a dog 22-45 park? — Appendix H: Comment Are the photos mislabeled? 22-46 Where is the CaIEEMod work done and referenced on page 104 that indicates nine of Comment fewer new visitors for the dog park? 22-47 — What will be the process to measure the real impact of noise after the park is complete? 22-48 —Will the City replace the dog park or eliminate parking if actual impact (assuming appropriate and consistent measurement) on Sunset View Park or Villa Balboa is worse than Comment assumed in this report? 22-49 4.16. Recreation Comment 22-50 —Why was Sunset View Park not considered in the assessment in this section? —Were local residents in Villa Balboa surveyed regarding the desired use? 22-51 —How will the homeless be patrolled in a dog park that has attributes desirable to the homeless — shaded benches, protected areas? Comment 22-52 Safety— NOT INCLUDED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL Comment 22-53 How has traffic safely been considered by the additional visitors to the parking area? t Comment —Could I be provided analysis the City has done on this? If it has not done this work, why 2-54 not? —How are actual traffic incidents on Superior considered when additional trips are considered? Comment —How will the bridge help to mitigate the acceleration and speeding that already occurs on 22-55 Superior as vehicles head away from the beach (driving behaviors that have lead to cars Comment jumping the curb)? 22-56 Oversight and Supervision — NOT INCLUDED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL t —What is the the record of the City in providing citations (other than at the high profile area at Comment the end of Newport Beach near Huntington Beach) broadly and specifically at Sunset View 2-57 Park for violations separately regarding dogs off leash and failure to pick up dog waste? —What is the history and patrol and removals for violations at the existing Newport Beach Comment dog park? 22-58 I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you. Sincerely, Deborah A. Gero Chambers Group, Inc. Page 5 old 21169 21-151 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beoch, California Response to Comment Letter #22 — Deborah Gero Response to Comment 22-1: Thank you for your comment. The Draft MND analyzed in the context of the nearest sensitive receptors, and provided approximate measurements from the edge of the proposed Project site (and not necessarily from the dog park itself) to the nearest sensitive receptor. The air quality analysis on page 52 found that the nearest sensitive receptors to the proposed Project site are multi -family homes located as near as 165 feet to the south and 220 feet to the northeast and single-family homes located as near as 300 feet to the southwest of the proposed area to be disturbed as part of the proposed Project. The noise analysis discussion on page 105 noted the nearest sensitive receptors, which would be the multi -family homes to the south of the proposed Project site, which are as near as 165 feet away. Response to Comment 22-2: Thank you for your comment. The noise measurement locations were selected in order to obtain the ambient noise measurements at the locations that would experience the greatest noise increase from construction and/or operation of the proposed Project. No noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the Villa Balboa Condos, since the grade is relatively flat in the Sunset View Park area that covers the nearest 200 feet to the Villa Balboa Condos and then there is a steep slope to the Project site. The southwest edge of Sunset View Park will block the line -of -sight between the proposed Dog Park and the Villa Balboa Condos. In fact the proposed dog park will be located more than 20 feet lower than the elevation at Sunset View Park. Since sound travels in straight lines, the southwest edge of Sunset View Park will effectively act like a 20 foot high sound wall between the proposed dog park and the condos. As such, only nominal construction noise impacts are anticipated to occur from the proposed project at the Villa Balboa Condos and no operational noise impacts from the proposed dog park or any other noise sources are anticipated to occur at the Villa Balboa Condos. As described in Section 4.13.1 of the Draft IS/MND, long-term (24-hour) noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the proposed Project. Results of the noise level measurements are presented in Table 4- 21 and the noise measurement printouts and photos of the noise measurements sites are provided in Appendix H. Response to Comment 22-3: Please referto Response to Comment 22-2. The CEC!A analysis analyzed impacts of increased noise from the Project in addition to the ambient noise levels. Response to Comment 22-4: There are no traffic trip rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual for dog parks. To determine the potential trips associated with a dog park, a comparison to a similar dog park in Laguna Beach was reviewed. The dog park in Laguna Beach is 2.5 acres in size and generates 480 trips per day. By comparison, the proposed 0.2-0.3 acre dog park would generate approximately 38 trips per day. Per the City Traffic Phasing Ordinance, a traffic impact study is required when there are more than 300 trips per day generated by a project. Given the estimated trips, it was determined that there is less than significant impact with the dog park portion of the Project. Chambers Group, Inc. 114 21169 21-152 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.14.1 Impact a) the proposed Project, including the dog park, would not indirectly induce population growth and is intended to serve the existing population in the area. No roadways, transit, or bicycle lanes would be significantly modified as a result of the proposed Project and therefore, would not conflict with applicable circulation plans. As discussed in Section 4.17.1 Impact a) of the MND, the proposed Project would not result in a substantial increase of users that would generate a significant increase in traffic because no construction of businesses or residences would occur and no expansion of park facilities other than the small dog park are proposed. The cost of a project is outside the scope of CEQA analysis for this Project, but your comment will be included for City Council's consideration. In addition, the proposed Project is limited to the bridge, parking lot, and dog park, and would not increase any scheduled activities at Sunset Ridge Park. Response to Comment 22-5: The purpose of the proposed Project is a construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue that would connect Sunset Ridge Park to the Superior Parking Lot at the intersection of West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. Please refer to Response to Comment 22-4. All traffic trips associated with Sunset Ridge Park (land use) are generated by the park visitors. The proposed parking lot expansion and bridge are not land uses and do not generate new trips. The parking lot and bridge are ancillary to the land use. Because there is no change to the park site with the Project area, there are no additional traffic trips that could be associated with the bridge and parking lot Project. The traffic trips associated with the park visitors, that will use the proposed bridge and expanded parking lot, already exist in the roadway system. Currently, the Sunset Ridge visitors park their vehicles where there are available parking spaces in the area. If the existing parking lot is full, park visitors find alternate parking places in the area, or drop off visitors and users. Response to Comment 22-6: As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.2 Project Purpose and Objectives, the Proposed Project aids in improving safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. This is an improvement from the present conditions where pedestrians and bicyclists typically cross the busy, major arterial roadways, West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue, to reach Sunset Ridge Park. The development of the proposed bridge would also result in a beneficial impact related to emergency response because the bridge would provide increased safety and direct access from the parking lot to Sunset Ridge Park. For pedestrians traveling along the eastern sidewalk along Superior Avenue, the access point to the parking lot would remain in the same location, therefore the Project would not result in a change in traffic patterns over what is already expected along the roadway. Response to Comment 22-7: Signage will be included that off -leash dogs must remain within the dog park area. As outlined in the City's Municipal Code Chapter 7.04.020: "No person having the care, charge or control of any dog shall cause or allow, either willfully or through failure to exercise due care or control, such dog to be present Chambers Group, Inc. 115 21169 21-153 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California upon any beach, street, alley, or public place, or upon any private property or premises other than his or her own without written consent of the owner or lessee of such land unless such dog is securely restrained by a substantial leash or chain not exceeding six feet in length and controlled by a person competent to restrain such dog. This section shall not be construed as allowing dogs on leashes in the areas from which dogs are prohibited as designated by Sections 7.04.025, 7.04.030, and 7.04.050. (Ord. 89-8 § 1, 1989: Ord. 1230 § 1, 1967: Ord. 796 (part), 1956: 1949 Code § 4107)." Park users shall comply with the City's code for use of dog restraints in public places. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.3.3, the design of the proposed 0.2-0.3 acre dog park includes the installation of 6 -foot tall fences, separating large and small dogs, thus clearly designating a space, specifically catered towards dogs and the pet owners. The dog park would also have ancillary facilities like a water fountain, benches, shade structure, security lighting, trash cans and waste bag dispensers for the pet owners' convenience and use. Some of these features would be absent in Sunset Ridge Park, namely the ability to allow dogs off -leash, thus acting as an incentive for pet owners to remain within the dog park. Installation of the fences would prevent dogs from exiting the designated park area and prevent dogs from entering any private properties, or public roadways. Response to Comment 22-8: The City has held meetings with surrounding neighborhoods to discuss the proposed Project. This issue is outside the scope of CEQA analysis; however, the City Council will consider public review comments in their review of the Project and CEQA document. Response to Comment 22-9: Dog park design and proximity to specific communities is outside the scope of CEQA analysis; however, the City Council will consider public review comments in their review of the Project and CEQA document. Response to Comment 22-10: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-7. Response to Comment 22-11: As described in Section 4.1.1 of the Draft IS/MND, photographs are provided from various viewpoints from the proposed Project area. Response to Comment 22-12: This is outside the scope of CEQA analysis for this Project, but your comment will be included for City Council's consideration. Response to Comment 22-13: The City of Newport Beach General Plan designates public viewpoints for coastal views within the city. Areas near the Project site that have such designation include Sunset Ridge Park, Sunset View Park, and along the trail above the current parking lot, including the designated point where a bench was installed. Chambers Group, Inc. 116 21169 21-154 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California The City's Local Coastal Plan also designates the same public view points in the designated parks and along the paved trail that fronts the Villa Balboa Community. Further, the bridge associated with the Project will provide safer unobstructed views of the coast. Response to Comment 22-14: As described in Section 4.1.1 Impact d), security lighting at the park and parking lot, as well as bridge lighting, would be down -shielded to prevent light scatter. The proposed Project would comply with the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code 21.30.070 and 20.30.070 Outdoor Lighting standards for parking lots and other manmade objects to reduce the impacts of glare, light trespass, over lighting, sky glow, and poorly shielded or inappropriately direct lighting fixtures. Response to Comment 22-15: Thank you for your comment. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.3.3, hours at the dog park would be consistent with the Municipal Code which restricts park hours to between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. The parking lot will be operated in the same manner as the existing parking lot with paid metered parking spaces from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.; and the parking lot would remain open for 24 hours per day. Low (42" tall) down -shielded safety lights to light up walkways will remain on throughout the night (sundown to sunup), similar to Sunset Ridge Park. Response to Comment 22-16: See Response to Comment 22-4. All traffic trips associated with Sunset Ridge Park (land use) are generated by the park visitors. The proposed parking lot expansion and bridge are not land uses and do not generate new trips. The parking lot and bridge are ancillary to the land use. Because there is no change to the park site with the Project area, there are no additional traffic trips that could be associated with the bridge and parking lot Project. The traffic trips associated with the park visitors, that will use the proposed bridge and expanded parking lot, already exist in the roadway system. Currently, the Sunset Ridge visitors park their vehicles where there are available parking spaces in the area. If the existing parking lot is full, park visitors find alternate parking places in the area, or drop off visitors and users. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.17.1 Impact a), the expanded parking lot associated with the proposed Project would serve existing park users and would not generate a significant increase in traffic because no businesses or residences are being constructed and no additional park facilities besides the dog park will be introduced. In fact, the parking lot would provide a designated parking area to diverge parking -related traffic from surrounding residential and commercial areas. Furthermore, there would be no conflict with applicable circulation plans due to no significant proposed modifications to roadways, transit, or bicycle lanes. These factors would prevent increased traffic generation due to the construction of the large parking lot. Response to Comment 22-17: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-16. Response to Comment 22-18: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-16. Chambers Group, Inc. 117 211&9 21-155 Superior Avenue Pedestrion and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beoch, California Response to Comment 22-19: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-16. Response to Comment 22-20: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-4. Hours at the dog park would be consistent with the Municipal Code which restricts park hours to between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. Response to Comment 22-21: As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.3.3 Impact d) a regular maintenance schedule, including proper handling and removal of pet waste will be established to prevent accumulation of dog waste at the park thus preventing the generation of odor. Additionally, as part of the design, the dog park would include conveniently -sited waste receptacles away from residences, and provision of waste bags for owners' use. In addition, with the use of synthetic turf specifically designed for dog parks, the ease of cleaning and maintenance is increased. The appropriate disposal of dog waste onsite would minimize odors perceptible to people. Pursuant to Section 7.20.020 of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code, it is unlawful for a person in charge of any animal "to permit such animal to defecate and to allow the feces to thereafter remain on any public sidewalk, public beach or park or on any other public property or on any private property other than that of the owner..." The Project's provision and maintenance of bags for the disposal of dog waste and of trash receptacles at the dog park would facilitate compliance with Municipal Code Section 7.20.020. Thus, the dog park is not expected to result in any significant impacts in relation to odor from pet waste. The Project site is not anticipated to introduce any other objectionable odors. Response to Comment 22-22: Please refer to response to Comment 22-21. Response to Comment 22-23: Please refer to response to Comment 22-7. Human behavior at dog parks is outside the scope of CEQA analysis for this Project, but your comment will be included for City Council's consideration. Response to Comment 22-24: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-4 and Response to Comment 22-16. Response to Comment 22-25: Artificial turf will be used for the dog park, and will be irrigated to break down dog waste, similar to what currently exists at the Civic Center dog park. Response to Comment 22-26: Chambers Group, Inc. 118 21169 21-156 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Please refer to Response to Comment 22-25. Response to Comment 22-27: The proposed Project will include an established cleaning schedule once construction is complete. The current Newport Beach dog park is outside the scope of this Project; however, this comment will be considered by the City Council in their review of the Project and CEQA document. Response to Comment 22-28: The City of Newport Beach General Plan designates public viewpoints for coastal views within the city. Areas near the Project site that have such designation include Sunset Ridge Park, Sunset View Park, and along the trail above the current parking lot, including the designated point where a bench was installed. The City's Local Coastal Plan also designates the same public view points in the designated parks and along the paved trail that fronts the Villa Balboa Community. The proposed Project will not impact views from Sunset View Park. Response to Comment 22-29: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-28. Response to Comment 22-30: As described in the Draft IS/MND Section 4.3.3 Impact a) the proposed Project is consistent with the existing land use designations and would not require a General Plan Amendment or zone change. As described in Section 4.11.1 Impact b), the proposed Project will maintain the current land uses. Response to Comment 22-31: The noise measurement locations were selected in order to obtain the ambient noise measurements at the locations that would experience the greatest noise increase from construction and/or operation of the proposed Project. No noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the Villa Balboa Condos, since the grade is relatively flat in the Sunset View Park area that covers the nearest 200 feet to the Villa Balboa Condos and then there is a steep slope to the Project site. The southwest edge of Sunset View Park will block the line -of -sight between the proposed Dog Park and the Villa Balboa Condos. In fact the proposed dog park will be located more than 20 feet lower than the elevation at Sunset View Park. Since sound travels in straight lines, the southwest edge of Sunset View Park will effectively act like a 20 foot high sound wall between the proposed dog park and the condos. As such, only nominal construction noise impacts are anticipated to occur from the proposed project at the Villa Balboa Condos and no operational noise impacts from the proposed dog park or any other noise sources are anticipated to occur at the Villa Balboa Condos. As described in the Draft IS/MND Section 4.13, noise measurement locations are provided in Appendix H. See Response to Comment 22-2. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.13.2 Impact a) the noise from the proposed dog park, from both dogs barking and dog -owners talking, would be well below (at least 30 dB below) ambient noise Chambers Group, Inc. 119 21169 21-157 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California levels. Noise is only additive if the noise source is within 10 dB of ambient noise levels. Since noise from the proposed dog park would be at least 30 dB below ambient noise levels, it would not provide a quantitative contribution to existing ambient noise levels and will not be discernible at the nearby homes. A noise study was conducted for the Proposed Project to compare noise levels for similar activities at other comparable facilities; and these noise measurements are presented in detail in Table 4-24 of the Draft IS/MND. Additionally, according to the CaIEEMod model run, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate nine or fewer additional daily trips above current conditions, which would have a negligible impact to the nearby roadway noise levels. Therefore, it has been determined that the noise levels generated at the dog park would be within the City's exterior daytime and nighttime residential noise standards. The Proposed Project would not result in a significant impact to the nearest homes in the vicinity of the Project. Response to Comment 22-32: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-2 and Response to Comment 22-31. Response to Comment 22-33: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-31. Response to Comment 22-34: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-31. Response to Comment 22-35: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-31. Response to Comment 22-36: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-31. Response to Comment 22-37: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-31. It is standard practice for CEQA documents to reference other CEQA documents that analyzed similar projects, such as the proposed dog park. Since the CEQA analysis for the Beverly Hill's Dog Park, utilized scientific methods and accepted noise analysis methodologies, the noise assumptions provided in the Beverly Hills Dog Park analysis provides a reasonable estimate of the noise impacts from the proposed dog park. It should be noted that the dog park noise at the nearest home was calculated based on the distance to the nearest Villa Balboa condo, however as detailed above, the line -of -sight between the Villa Balboa condos and the proposed dog park is blocked by the topography, as such the calculated dog park noise would actually be much lower at the nearest homes than what was presented in Table 4-24 of the Draft IS/MND. Response to Comment 22-38: Chambers Group, Inc. 120 21169 21-158 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Please refer to Response to Comment 22-4 and Response to Comment 22-31. Dog park size and design is outside the scope of CEQA analysis; however, the City Council will consider public review comments in their review of the Project and CEQA document. Response to Comment 22-39: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-4. Dog park size and design is outside the scope of CEQA analysis; however, the City Council will consider public review comments in their review of the Project and CEQA document. Response to Comment 22-40: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-4. Dog park size and design is outside the scope of CEQA analysis; however, the City Council will consider public review comments in their review of the Project and CEQA document. Response to Comment 22-41: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-31. The noise analysis utilized the most conservative attenuation rate assumptions, which are based on flat ground. As detailed above, if topography is taken into account, the dog park noise impacts at the nearest homes would be much lower than the 37 dB reported, since the line -of -sight between the nearest homes at Villa Balboa is blocked by an approximately 20 foot elevation grade difference, which would provide similar noise reduction as if there was a 20 foot high wall located between the nearest homes and the proposed Dog Park. Response to Comment 22-42: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-31. The CEQA analysis analyzed impacts of increased noise from the Project in addition to the ambient noise levels. Response to Comment 22-43: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-31. Response to Comment 22-44: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-5. Response to Comment 22-45: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-4. Dog park location selection is outside the scope of CEQA analysis; however, the City Council will consider public review comments in their review of the Project and CEQA document Response to Comment 22-46: Comment noted. Chambers Group, Inc. 121 21169 21-159 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response to Comment 22-47: The CalEEMod model results are provided in Appendix A for air quality emissions. In terms of traffic impacts, there are no traffic trip rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual for dog parks. To determine the potential trips associated with a dog park, a comparison to a similar dog park in Laguna Beach was reviewed. The dog park in Laguna Beach is 2.5 acres in size and generates 480 trips per day. By comparison, the proposed 0.2-0.3 acre dog park would generate approximately 38 trips per day. Per the City Traffic Phasing Ordinance, a traffic impact study is required when there are more than 300 trips per day generated by a project. Given the estimated trips, it was determined that there is less than significant impact with the dog park portion of the Project. Response to Comment 22-48: The CEQA document addresses potential noise impacts and found that no significant impacts would occur. Therefore, no noise monitoring is required for the proposed Project. Ongoing noise monitoring is outside the scope of CEQA; however, City Council will consider public review comments in their review of the Project and CEQA document. Response to Comment 22-49: Thank you for your comment; City Council will consider public review comments in their review of the Project and CEQA document. Response to Comment 22-50: As noted in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.16, the analysis does consider construction impacts at the edge of Sunset View Park due to the bridge discussion. After construction of the proposed Project, the expanded parking lot and pedestrian and bike bridge would provide increased connectivity by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. Response to Comment 22-51: The City held community meetings with Villa Balboa and other local community groups to discuss the proposed Project. Response to Comment 22-52: Park hours will be enforced per the Municipal Code. Response to Comment 22-53: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-6. Response to Comment 22-54: Chambers Group, Inc. 122 21169 21-160 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Please refer to Response to Comment 22-6. Response to Comment 22-55: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-6. There are no traffic trip rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual for dog parks. To determine the potential trips associated with a dog park, a comparison to a similar dog park in Laguna Beach was reviewed. The dog park in Laguna Beach is 2.5 acres in size and generates 480 trips per day. By comparison, the proposed 0.2-0.3 acre dog park would generate approximately 38 trips per day. Per the City Traffic Phasing Ordinance, a traffic impact study is required when there are more than 300 trips per day generated by a project. Given the estimated trips, it was determined that there is less than significant impact with the dog park portion of the Project. Response to Comment 22-56: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-4. The Draft IS/MND was prepared in accordance with CEQA to analyze the proposed Project impacts to the environment. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 2.2 Project Purpose and Objectives, the Proposed Project aids in improving safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at - grade crosswalk. This is an improvement from the present conditions where pedestrians and bicyclists typically cross the busy, major arterial roadways, West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue, to reach Sunset Ridge Park. Response to Comment 22-57: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-7 and Response to Comment 22-21. This is outside the scope of CEQA analysis for this Project, but your comment will be included for City Council's consideration. Response to Comment 22-58: Please refer to Response to Comment 22-4. The proposed Project is to analyze the environmental impacts within the designated project area as identified in Figure 2-2 of the Draft IS/MND. This is outside the scope of CEQA analysis for this Project, but your comment will be included for City Council's consideration. Chambers Group, Inc. 123 21169 21-161 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #23 — California Department of Fish and Wildlife COMMENT LETTER #23 State of California - Natural Resources icy GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH ANDWILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director South Coast Region ' 3883 Ruffin Road San Diego, CA 92123 (858)467-4201 www.wiIdlife.ca.00v October 22, 2019 Mr. Andy Tran City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 atran(a)newportbeachca.gov Subject: Comments on the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge Parking Lot Project, Newport Beach,CA (SCH#2019099074) Dear Mr. Tran: The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) has reviewed the above referenced Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge Parking Lot, dated September 2019. The following statements and comments have been prepared pursuant to the Department's authority as Trustee Agency with jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project (California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA] Guidelines § 15386) and pursuant to our authority as a Responsible Agency under CEQA Guidelines section 15381 over those aspects of the proposed project that come under the purview of the California Endangered Species Act (Fish and Game Code§ 2050 et seq.) and Fish and Game Code section 1600 et seq. The Department also administers the Natural Community Conservation Planning (NCCP) program. The City of Newport Beach (City) is a participating landowner under the Central/Coastal Orange County NCCP/Habitat Conservation Plan. The project will construct a pedestrian and bicycle bridge over Superior Avenue, connecting Sunset Ridge Park to a new asphalt parking lot located at the northeast corner of West Coast Highway, as well as createa new larger parking lot and a fenced dog park on 3.4 acres. Habitats observed on site include Artemisia californica Eriogonum fasciculatum shrubland (0.01 acre), ornamental landscaping (1.19 acres), disturbed/ruderal (1.16 acres), and developed area (1.09 acres). Protocol surveys for coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica; Endangered Species Act- listed threatened) were conducted. We offer the following comments and recommendations to assist the City in avoiding or minimizing potential project impacts on biological resources. 1. With regard to burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia; California Species of Special Concern):The MND states that, "[d]ue to the level of disturbance in the area of the Comment 23-1 Conserving Ca[ifornia's Wi U[ fe Since 1870 Chambers Group, Inc. 124 21169 21-162 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Mr. Andy Tran City of Newport Beach October 22, 2019 Page 2 of 5 proposed [p]roject and the high level of human activity directly adjacent to the Artemisia califomica-Eriogonum fasciculatum shrubland, the sensitive wildlife species with a potential to occur are not expected on the proposed project footprint; therefore, no project impacts to the species are expected." (page 57) The Comment Department disagrees that proximity to human activity is'a valid rationale for not 23-1 conducting burrowing owl surveys. Tolerance to disturbance and/or human activities Contd. is highly variable amongst individual and pairs of burrowing owls. Some individuals and/or pairs are highly adapted to heavily altered habitats such as golf courses, airports, business complexes, and athletic fields (e.g., Sunset Ridge Park), particularly if there is foraging habitat in proximity (Gervais et al 2008). We recommend that the Biological Technical Report be amended to include protocol surveys as described in the Department's 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. 2. The Biological Technical Report associated with the MND (Chambers Group 2019) describes the disturbed/ruderal habitat within the project area as, "devoid of vegetation due to recent disturbances," (page 15). The description of the native Comment plants that are found within the disturbed/ruderal polygon, in addition to the 23-2 polygon's placement within the project area (Biological Technical Report; Figure 4: Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Vegetation Communities), the Department requests that the MND discuss in greater detail the nature of the "recent disturbance" which occurred in this area; we also request confirmation that the polygon in question was not mitigation for any previous project impacts. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the draft MND for this project and to assist the City in further minimizing and mitigating project impacts to biological resources. The Department requests an opportunity to review and comment on any response that the City has to our comments and to receive notification of the forthcoming hearing date for the project (CEQA Guidelines; §15073(e)). If you have any questions or comments regarding this letter, please contact Jennifer Turner at (858-467- 2717), or via email at Jennifer.turnerCa�wildlife.c.agov. Sincerely, Gail . Sevrens Environmental Program Manager cc: Christine Medak (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) Scott Morgan (State Clearinghouse) Chambers Group, Inc. 125 21169 21-163 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Mr. Andy Tran City of Newport Beach October 22, 2019 Page 3 of5 CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2012. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. Sacramento, California, USA. Gervais, J. A., D. K. Rosenberg, and L.A. Comrac.kBurrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) in Shuford, W.D. and T. Gardali, editors. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California, USA. Chambers Group, Inc. 126 21169 21-164 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beoch, California Response to Comment #23 — California Department of Fish and Wildlife Response to Comment 23-1: Thank you for your comment. The Biological Technical Report provides further information on why burrowing owl are assumed to have a low potential to occur at the site. As noted in Section 4.3.1 of the Biological Technical Report, "This species inhabits dry, open, native or non-native grasslands, deserts, and other arid environments with low -growing and low-density vegetation. It may occupy golf courses, cemeteries, road rights -of way, airstrips, abandoned buildings, irrigation ditches, and vacant lots with holes or cracks suitable for use as burrows. Burrowing owls typically use burrows made by mammals such as California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi), foxes, or badgers. When burrows are scarce, the burrowing owl may use man-made structures such as openings beneath cement or asphalt pavement, pipes, culverts, and nest boxes. Burrowing owls often are found within, under, or in close proximity to man-made structures. Prey sources for this species include small rodents; arthropods such as spiders, crickets, centipedes, and grasshoppers; smaller birds; amphibians; reptiles; and carrion. Threats to the burrowing owl include loss of nesting burrows, habitat loss, and mortality from motor vehicles. Low quality habitat occurs within the eastern portion of the proposed Project footprint; however, the proposed Project site lacks connectivity to additional suitable habitat for this species. Therefore, this species has a low potential to occur within the proposed Project footprint. The low -quality habitat located within the proposed Project site is composed primarily of hard and compact soils and lacked the soft soils preferred by burrowing owl. No burrows were observed, which are typically utilized by this species. In addition, focused surveys for coastal California gnatcatcher were conducted within the project footprint and included a 500 -foot buffer and no burrowing owl or signs of burrowing owls were observed throughout the surveys. Response to Comment 23-2: The Biological Technical Report provides a general definition of "disturbed/ruderal" habitat as, "mostly devoid of vegetation due to recent disturbances. The small amount of vegetation that begins to reclaim the soil is dominated by non-native, weedy species that are adapted to frequent disturbances. Soils in Disturbed/Ruderal areas are also typically characterized as heavily compacted." This is a general definition and the "recent disturbances" discussion is not specific to the Project site. While the placement of fill material that comprises the earthen mound and original associated heavy groundwork was performed in 1980's, persistent and ongoing lower levels of disturbance have created compaction and soil conditions mostly suitable for weedy species. The proposed Project site was not previously used as a mitigation site, nor would the proposed activities impact any mitigation lands. As described in Section 4.4.1(f) of the Draft IS/MND, the proposed Project is not located within an environmental study area and there are no potentially significant impacts anticipated to the habitats or species that have the potential to occur. In addition, avoidance and minimization efforts would result in direct and indirect impacts to be less than significant to habitats, natural communities, and wildlife. The location of the bridge abutment on the Sunset Ridge Park side of Superior Avenue is within a 5.15 - acre CSS planting area that was required as a special condition of the Sunset Ridge Park CDP (Special Condition 2.1.a). There may be some temporary construction impacts to this planting area, which will be mitigated onsite (MM BIO -4), with the impacted area replanted equivalent to existing conditions. Chambers Group, Inc. 127 21169 21-165 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Permanent impacts due to abutment location and shading from the bridge is calculated to be 0.02 acres (886 square feet). Permanent impacts to the CSS planting area will be mitigated offsite, but within Sunset Ridge Park. This will be at a 1:1 ratio with the intent of continuing to comply with the Special Condition of the Sunset Ridge Park CDP. Chambers Group, Inc. 128 21169 21-166 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #24 —California Department of Transportation COMMENT LETTER #24 STATF OF QAI IFORNIA AI IF(1RNIA STATF TR ANSPORTATInN AQFNCY Gavin Newsom +OV m DEPARTME4TOF TRANSPORTATTO N DISTRICT 12 1750 EASTFOURTHSTREETSUffE100 SANTAANA, CA 92705 PHONE (657) 328-6310 FAX 657) 328-6510 TTY 711 www.dot.ca.gov October 22, 2019 Mr. Andy Tran City of Newport Beach 100 Civic CenterDrive Newport Beach,CA 92660 Dear Mr. Tran, c�1 Making Conservation a California Way of Life. File: IGR/CEQA SCH#: 2019099074 IGR# 2019-01233 SRI PM 20.37 Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the review of the Notice of Completion (NOC) fo r the Initial Study (IS)for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project in Newport Beach. The mission of Caltrans istoprovide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transporta tion system to enhance California's economy and livability. The City of Newport Beach (City) proposes the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overt rossing Superior Avenue, a new larger parking lot with a range of 100 to 128 p arking spaces and a fenced dog park on an approximately 3.4 -acre site. The prop osedbridge will connect Sunset Ridge Parkto the new asphalt parking lot located at the northeast corner of West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue . The p rop osedProject is located within the City of Newport Beach and is located approximately 1,000 feet from the coastline. Currently, an existing City -owned parking lot with 64 metered parking stalls is loc ated at the northea stcorner of this intersection. The existin gSuperior Parking Lot is appro xima tely 0.64 acres, with the driveway to the parking lot at approximately 0. 17 acres. Accesstofneexisting parking lot isavailable via an en trance off Superior Avenue for vehicles, and viaaconcrete pathway from the intersect i onof Superior Avenue and Pad fic Coast Highway (SRI)for pedestrians and bicyclists. Directly east of the existing p arking lot isan undeveloped piece of land with steep slopeswith ground elevations ranging from approxima tely 10 feet near SR1,to ap proxi ma tely 75 feet near Sunset View Park. Properties and la nduses adjacent to the Project site include Sunset Ridge Park, Sunset View Park, Villa Balboa and Newport Crest resid enti al ccm mn ities, and thelower campus of Hoag Hospital. A shopping c enter and the Lido Sands residential c ommunity are located to the south across SR1from the Project site. SRI isowned and operated by Caltrans. Caltrans isaresponsible agency and has the following comments: "Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability" Chambers Group, Inc. 129 21169 21-167 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California City of I\d port Beach October 22, 2019 Page2 1. In the Initial Study, Section 2.3.4 mention sthat construction will take 14-18 months Comment for completion and it will avoid the fall and spring months. Please note that 24-1 temporary lane closure or signkantincrea sehconstruction traffic along Pacific Coa stHighway between Memorial Day and Labor Day is not recommended. 2. In the Initial Study, Section 2.3.4also mentions that construction will occur during Comment the daytime hours of 7am to 4:30pm. Please note that temporary closures on 24-2 Pad ficCoast Highway should only be between the hours of 9am to 3pm. There is a Safety Improvement projec t by Caltrans (OQ830K) that proposes to modify traffic signals and add safety lighting at the intersection of SRI and Sipe riorAvenue. Caltrans' project may conflict with the City'sfuture Comment improvement project at this intersection . Please contact Caltrans Project 24-3 Mana ger, Bob Bazargan at b ob.bazarga n@dot.ca.govor (657) 328-6298, in or er to coordinate all project stages and development for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project. Comment 1. Consid er including wayfinding signagefor pedestrians and bicyclists in the 24-4 projec t vicinity. Thiswill enc ourage the use of Active Transportation and improve safety for Active Transportation users. 2. Consid e r providing secure bicycle storage on the project site, especially near Comment Su ns et Ridge Par k. This will enc ourage visi t ors to utilize Active Transportation to 24-5 acc essthe site, thus improving air qua lity and reducing congestion. 3. Ensure that the project will be accessible to ADA -reliant visitors. In the subsequent phase s, consider discussing how ADA -re Iia nt users will access the proposed parking lot from the intersection of Superior Avenue and West Coast Highway. Comment Pro vid ing ADA -compliant accessibi lity will ensure that all visitors, regardless of 24-6 ability, will have access to the site and its services, as well as access to the coastal zone. 4. There are existing pedest rian, bicycle, and transit facilities near or adjacent to the site, including regionally signifi cant trails and corridors like the Santa Ana River Trail, Banning Channel Bikeway, , and Pacific Coast Highway. During Comment c onstruct ion, Caltrans rec omm ends that appropriate detours and safety 24-7 measure sareinplace that prioritize the mobility, access, and safety of bic yclists, p ed estrians, and transit users. If sidewalks, bike lanes, or transit stops need to be "Provide a safe, sustainabl,eintegrated and efficient transportation system to enhance Cardbmias economy and WaNky" Chambers Group, Inc. 130 21169 21-168 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California I City of Newport Beach October 22, 2019 Page3 Comment 24-7 close dduring construction, please ensure that closures and detours are clearly Contd. sig ►red 5. Sh o Lid any existing bike lanes be closed during construction, we recommend th use of "May Use Full Lane" (NU TCD R4--11) signage rather than "Share the Fbn-d Comment " (WI 6-1P) signage to more clearly indicate to both drivers and bicyclists th t 24-8 bicyclists may ride in the center of the travel lane while the bike lane is do PemIGS: • [. An project work proposed in the vicinity of the State right of way will require an en roachment permit, and all environmental concerns must be adequately adtlressed. Please coordinate with Caltrans in order to meet the requirements for an work within or near State Right -of -Way. Afee may apply. If the cost of work w in the State right of way is below one Million Dollars, the Encroachment Pe mit process will be handled by our Permits Branch; otherwise the permit Comment shou Id beauthorized through the Caltrans's Project Development Department. W 24-9 en applying for Encroachment Permit, please incorporate all Environmental Doc umentation, SWPPP/WPCP, NPDES, Hydraulic Calculations, R/W certification an all relevant design details including design exception approvals. For specific de ails for Encroachment Permits p roc edure, please refer to the Caltrans's Enroachment Permits Manual. The late stedition of the Manual isavailable on the web site: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hg/traffops/developsery/permits/ I Please c onti nue to coordinate with Caltrans for ony future developments that could potential! impact State transp orta tion facilities. If you have any questions, please do not hesit Vlocontact Julie Lugaro at 657-328-6368 or Julie. lugaroCc�dot.ca.gov. Sincerely, H�% Scott She ey Branch C ief, Regional-IGR-Transit Planning District 12 Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and;l8cient transportation system to enhance Califomiaiis economy and livability" Chambers Group, Inc. 131 21169 21-169 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Response to Comment #24 — California Department of Transportation Response to Comment 24-1: Thank you for your comment; this comment has been noted. The City will limit lane closures from Memorial Day to Labor Day. Response to Comment 24-2: If a lane needs to be closed on Pacific Coast Highway it will be closed only between gam and 3pm. Response to Comment 24-3: Thank you for this information, the City will coordinate with Bob Bazarga. Response to Comment 24-4: Wayfinding signs will be considered by the City. Response to Comment 24-5: The City currently has bike racks at Sunset Ridge Park; in addition, as part of the project a bike node with fix -it station will be installed. Response to Comment 24-6: All proposed improvements will be ADA compliant. Response to Comment 24-7: Appropriate detours and safety measures will be in place during construction. Response to Comment 24-8: The City concurs and will provide signage as suggested. Response to Comment 24-9 Comment noted; appropriate State permitting will be coordinated prior to Project construction. Chambers Group, Inc. 132 21169 21-170 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter #25 —Michael Call COMMENT LETTER #25 Andy Tran, P. E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: 949-644-3315 October 19, 2019 Michael Call Cell (714) 791-1102 210 Lille Lane 208 Newport Beach, CA 93663 onecall4alll@verivon.net There are 4 total pages. The following questions are unless otherwise indicated in reference to the proposed dog park included in the Lower Sunset View Park Conceptual Design located in Newport Beach California and the word "City" refers to the City of Newport Beach. When there is a reference to "the report" this means any reports or documentation produced by the City includingthe Mitigation Negative Declaration and any other environmental documentation provided by the City. Your timely response to these questions is requested so as to provide adequate time for follow up questions and/or responses. 1. Very specifically describe the public demand by any individual or group for dog parks? A. In Newport Beach? B. In west Newport Beach? Comment C. At the specific location cited in the Sunset View Park proposal? 25-1 D. How were these specific demands made and recorded? E. Has there been any survey of nearby residents or current visitors to Sunset View Park? 2.Is the proposed dog park in some way to provide an alternative to the illicit dog park located in and I Comment alongside of the Santa Ana river? 25-2 3.Is the proposed dog park being considered an alternative to the enforcement of the present leash I Comment laws? 25-3 4. Are there any statistics for? A. The number of persons that reside in Newport Beach that use dog parks? Comment B. The number of injuries to dogs and humans at the existing dog park? 25-4 1 Chambers Group, Inc. 133 21169 21-171 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California C. The numbers of individual dogs and humans that have contracted a disease or a parasite at the Comment existing dog park? 25-4 Balboa Community? Comment S.Have the contributors to the Environmental Study demonstrated expertise in the size and structure of 25-5 the Dog Park? 25-13 6.Can the contributor's site studies from the scientific literature which discuss the volume of noise fromI Comment given projected numbers of barking dogs concentration in given spaces? 25-6 7.What expertise do the contributors have as to dog park design in general and specifically to space Comment requirements as it relates to safety of the dogs and human users? 1 25-7 8. What is the minimum safe dog park size? Comment A. What studies did the contributors rely on to make this conclusion? 25-8 B. How does park size effect dog crowd behavior? 9.Why is it the environmental report does not recommend safe guards for overcrowding and proper Comment separation distances for extremely small parks of this size? 25-9 10.What guarantees and enforceable promises are there that the staff, designers and/or engineers will Comment not increase size of the dog park without further review or public comment? 1 25-10 12.What are the assumptions and/or the methods used for the standard attenuation rate, given the Comment topography and atmospheric conditions at the site? 1 25-11 13. Are there any studies of the effect of the removal of the mound of dirt? A. Would the removal of the mound of dirt cause an increase of noise at the park and at in the Villa Comment Balboa Community? 25-12 14. Is the City staff aware, as cited in the environmental study, at the proposed location of the dog park, Comment the sound levels are already in excess to the City's existing permissible levels? 25-13 Comment 15. Will the City proposal for the dog park likely magnify the noise level with its present design? 25-14 16.Will the City be taking this opportunity to mitigate the noise levels that have already been Comment determined to be in excessive by the Cities environmental report? 25-15 17.1s the City aware that almost all other dog parks are on commercial or industrial cites NOT immediately adjacent to (and as importantly accessible to) a densely populated residential community Comment on highly valuable land long treasured for other uses? 25-16 18.Why is there no discussion of the health hazards of a critical care hospital in close proximity to the proposed dog park? A. Why is there no discussion in the report of the constant use of the existing parks walkway by Hoag Hospital doctors, nurses, technicians, administrators often wearing their scrubs and patients as a Comment probable transportation of pest and infectious diseases to this critical care hospital and even directly to 25-17 patients with compromise immune systems? Chambers Group, Inc. 134 21169 21-172 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California 19. Why does the report not address the fact that the proposed dog park will disrupt existing recreational activities? A.Why does the report not discuss the interference of the proposed dog park with the present terrain and continuity of park and recreation from Sunset Ridge Park on the west all the way to Hoag Hospital on the east? Comment B.Many individuals enjoy the view the Huntington Beach Air Show and celebrate Independence Day by 25-18 watching the fireworks all along the coast from Huntington Beach all the way to Laguna Beach from our favorite park. People enjoy the view and serene environment most every evening of the year. Why does the report not discuss the present natural and cultural resources and recreational usage includes all the citizens of Newport Beach and surrounding communities' visiting the park? 20. Is the City aware that the Villa Balboa Community, the predominate nearby community, is now and has always been a no dog development? A. Is the City aware that the original CCRs which are still in effect prohibit dogs in the Villa Balboa development? B.Is the City aware that the Villa Balboa association as obtained an attorney's letter statingthe Comment opposition to the proposed dog park? 25-19 C.Has it been considered that the current quite enjoyment by humans (including hopefully compliant dog owners with their dogs) does not diminish the enjoyment of this unique and widely used location by others? 21. Why does the report not discuss the negative impact on property values caused by the loss of the quiet enjoyment of nearby homeowners? A.Why does the report not have any proximity study of the impact of the lack of substantial buffers to Comment significant residential communities? 25-20 B.Why does the report not discuss or study the impact of a dog park being super -imposed on the highly valued ocean view home in direct proximity? 22. Why does the report not compare and contrast other uses to determine the highest and best use? A.Why does the report not analyze the highest and best use for the public good comparing a dog park Comment to alternative recreational activities at the property like workout trails and courses? 25-21 B.Why does the report no explore completing the View Park to enhance the viewing experience for visitors? 23.Why does the report not explore or discuss the overburden and abusive allocation of services in Comment west Newport Beach as exampled by the: 1. New Homeless Shelter and SOS Kitchen, 2. PCH Noise, 3. 25-22 Illegal Dog Beach, 4. Nightly Police helicopter flyovers? 24.Why does the report not explore or discuss the overburden and abusive allocation of services on the Villa Balboa Community as exampled by the: 1. Cogent Plant presently out of compliance noise, plums of gases and negative effect on homeowner views and the continuing cost of damages to the exterior of the Comment Villa Balboa Structures, 2. Hoag future campus expansion, 3. Ambulance noise, 4. Nighttime 25-23 Chambers Group, Inc. 135 21169 21-173 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California required helicopter flights overhead to meet the contractual fly overtime, 5. Superior Bridge Comment (Prospective) and 6. Expanded Adjacent Parking (Prospective)? 25-23 Contd. Chambers Group, Inc. 4 136 21169 21-174 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #25 — Michael Call Response to Comment 25-1: Thank you for your comment. The City held community meetings with Villa Balboa and other local neighborhood groups to discuss the proposed Project. The purpose of the proposed Project is a construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue that would connect Sunset Ridge Park to the Superior Parking Lot at the intersection of West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. The objectives of the project are: • To improve safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. • To provide additional parking spaces to better serve both passive uses and organized sporting events (mostly youth) at Sunset Ridge Park in an area where parking is limited. • To reduce traffic signal wait times by shifting pedestrian and bicycle traffic from the at -grade crosswalk to the bridge. • To expand recreational options in this part of the City by developing a small dog park just below Sunset View Park, adjacent to the expanded parking lot. Response to Comment 25-2: Please refer to response to Comment 25-1. This is outside the scope of CECIA analysis, however your comment is included for City Council's consideration. Response to Comment 25-3: Please refer to response to Comment 25-2. Signage will be included that off -leash dogs must remain within the dog park area. As outlined in the City's Municipal Code Chapter 7.04.020: "No person having the care, charge or control of any dog shall cause or allow, either willfully or through failure to exercise due care or control, such dog to be present upon any beach, street, alley, or public place, or upon any private property or premises other than his or her own without written consent of the owner or lessee of such land unless such dog is securely restrained by a substantial leash or chain not exceeding six feet in length and controlled by a person competent to restrain such dog. This section shall not be construed as allowing dogs on leashes in the areas from which dogs are prohibited as designated by Sections 7.04.025, 7.04.030, and 7.04.050. (Ord. 89-8 § 1, 1989: Ord. 1230 § 1, 1967: Ord. 796 (part), 1956: 1949 Code § 4107)." Park users shall comply with the City's code for use of dog restraints in public places. Response to Comment 25-4: Chambers Group, Inc. 137 21169 21-175 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Please refer to Response to Comment 25-1. Design of the size and structure of the dog park is outside the scope of CEQA analysis, however this comment is included for City Council's consideration. Response to Comment 25-5: Please refer to response to Comment 25-1; this is outside the scope of CEQA analysis for this Project, but your comment will be included for City Council's consideration. Response to Comment 25-6: The noise analysis of the proposed Dog Park utilized published data of the noise level measured at an existing dog park. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.13.2 Impact a) the noise from the proposed dog park, from both dogs barking and dog -owners talking, would be well below (at least 30 dB below) ambient noise levels. Noise is only additive if the noise source is within 10 d6 of ambient noise levels. Since noise from the proposed dog park would be at least 30 dB below ambient noise levels, it would not provide a quantitative contribution to existing ambient noise levels and will not be discernible at the nearby homes. A noise study was conducted for the Proposed Project to compare noise levels for similar activities at other comparable facilities; and these noise measurements are presented in detail in Table 4-24 of the Draft IS/MND. Additionally, according to the CalEEMod model run, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate nine or fewer additional daily trips above current conditions, which would have a negligible impact to the nearby roadway noise levels. Therefore, it has been determined that the noise levels generated at the dog park would be within the City's exterior daytime and nighttime residential noise standards. The Proposed Project would not result in a significant impact to the nearest homes in the vicinity of the Project. Response to Comment 25-7: Dog park design is outside the scope of CEQA analysis; however, the City Council will consider public review comments in their review of the Project and CEQA document. Response to Comment 25-8: Please refer to Response to Comment 25-1; dog park design and crowd behavior are outside the scope of CEQA analysis for this Project, but your comment will be included for City Council's consideration. Response to Comment 25-9: Thank you for your comment; dog park design is outside the scope of CEQA analysis for this Project, but your comment will be included for City Council's consideration. Response to Comment 25-10: According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 and 15162, if there are substantial changes to an approved Project that could result insignificant impacts, additional CEQA documentation would be required. Response to Comment 25-11: Chambers Group, Inc. 138 21169 21-176 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California Thank you for your comment. The noise measurement locations were selected in order to obtain the ambient noise measurements at the locations that would experience the greatest noise increase from construction and/or operation of the proposed Project. No noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the Villa Balboa Condos, since the grade is relatively flat in the Sunset View Park area that covers the nearest 200 feet to the Villa Balboa Condos and then there is a steep slope to the Project site. The southwest edge of Sunset View Park will block the line -of -sight between the proposed Dog Park and the Villa Balboa Condos. In fact the proposed dog park will be located more than 20 feet lower than the elevation at Sunset View Park. Since sound travels in straight lines, the southwest edge of Sunset View Park will effectively act like a 20 foot high sound wall between the proposed dog park and the condos. As such, only nominal construction noise impacts are anticipated to occur from the proposed project at the Villa Balboa Condos and no operational noise impacts from the proposed dog park or any other noise sources are anticipated to occur at the Villa Balboa Condos. The noise analysis utilized the most conservative attenuation rate assumptions, which are based on flat ground. As detailed above, if topography is taken into account, the dog park noise impacts at the nearest homes would be much lower than the 37 dB reported, since the line -of -sight between the nearest homes at Villa Balboa is blocked by an approximately 20 foot elevation grade difference, which would provide similar noise reduction as if there was a 20 foot high wall located between the nearest homes and the proposed dog park. Response to Comment 25-12: See Response to Comment 25-11. Response to Comment 25-13: The City of Newport Beach Municipal Code does not provide any noise standards for public parks. As such, the existing noise level at the proposed Dog Park does not violate the City's noise standards. The CEQA analysis analyzed impacts of increased noise from the Project in addition to the ambient noise levels. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.13.2 Impact a) the noise from the proposed dog park, from both dogs barking and dog -owners talking, would be well below (at least 30 dB below) ambient noise levels. Noise is only additive if the noise source is within 10 dB of ambient noise levels. Since noise from the proposed dog park would be at least 30 dB below ambient noise levels, it would not provide a quantitative contribution to existing ambient noise levels and will not be discernible at the nearby homes. A noise study was conducted for the Proposed Project to compare noise levels for similar activities at other comparable facilities; and these noise measurements are presented in detail in Table 4-24 of the Draft IS/MND. Additionally, according to the CalEEMod model run, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate nine or fewer additional daily trips above current conditions, which would have a negligible impact to the nearby roadway noise levels. Therefore, it has been determined that the noise levels generated at the dog park would be within the City's exterior daytime and nighttime residential noise standards. Response to Comment 25-14: Chambers Group, Inc. 139 21169 21-177 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California Please refer to response to Comment 25-13. The proposed design of excavating the location for the proposed dog park and lowering the elevation by approximately 20 feet will provide additional sound reduction for the nearest homes located to the northeast of the proposed dog park. Response to Comment 25-15: Please refer to response to Comment 25-13. The Proposed Project would not result in a significant impact to the nearest homes in the vicinity of the Project. The residential exterior noise standards provided in the Municipal Code only apply to non -transportation noise sources. As such, there is no evidence provided in the Draft IS/MND that shows that any of the nearby homes currently exceed the City's residential exterior noise standards. The CEQA analysis analyzed impacts of increased noise from the Project in addition to the ambient noise levels. Response to Comment 25-16: Dog park design is outside the scope of CEQA analysis; however, the City Council will consider public review comments in their review of the Project and CEQA document. Response to Comment 25-17: The Draft IS/MND focuses on the impacts of the proposed Project to the existing environment. As described in the Draft IS/MND, Section 4.3.3 Impact d) a regular maintenance schedule, including proper handling and removal of pet waste will be established to prevent accumulation of dog waste at the park thus preventing the generation of odor. Additionally, as part of the design, the dog park would include conveniently -sited waste receptacles away from residences, and provision of waste bags for owners' use. In addition, with the use of synthetic turf specifically designed for dog parks, the ease of cleaning and maintenance is increased. The appropriate disposal of dog waste onsite would minimize odors perceptible to people. Pursuant to Section 7.20.020 of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code, it is unlawful for a person in charge of any animal "to permit such animal to defecate and to allow the feces to thereafter remain on any public sidewalk, public beach or park or on any other public property or on any private property other than that of the owner..." The Project's provision and maintenance of bags for the disposal of dog waste and of trash receptacles at the dog park would facilitate compliance with Municipal Code Section 7.20.020. Potential infectious diseases from pests is outside the scope of CEQA analysis for this Project, but your comment will be included for City Council's consideration. Response to Comment 25-18: The purpose of the proposed Project is a construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue that would connect Sunset Ridge Park to the Superior Parking Lot at the intersection of West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. The objectives of the project are: Chambers Group, Inc. 140 21169 21-178 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California • To improve safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park for pedestrians and bicyclists by eliminating the need to cross Superior Avenue via the existing at -grade crosswalk. • To provide additional parking spaces to better serve both passive uses and organized sporting events (mostly youth) at Sunset Ridge Park in an area where parking is limited. • To reduce traffic signal wait times by shifting pedestrian and bicycle traffic from the at -grade crosswalk to the bridge. • To expand recreational options in this part of the City by developing a small dog park just below Sunset View Park, adjacent to the expanded parking lot. The proposed Project would not obstruct the views of the coastal area, or views from Sunset View Park. Views of the coastline from Sunset View Park will be unaffected. Response to Comment 25-19: The City held community meetings with Villa Balboa and other local neighborhood groups to discuss the proposed Project. Please refer to Response in Comment 25-7. Response to Comment 25-20: Please refer to Response to Comment 25-7. Property values are outside the scope of CEQA analysis, however your comment will be included for City Council's consideration. The proposed dog park will be approximately 50 feet downslope of Sunset View Park, and approximately 100 feet to the southwest of Sunset View Park. Response to Comment 25-21: Please refer to the Response to Comment 25-2. The purpose of CEQA is to analyze a proposed project's impact on the environment. Response to Comment 25-22: Please referto Response to Comment 25-11 and Response to Comment 25-13. The Draft IS/MND analyzed the proposed Project's impacts in addition to existing ambient conditions. However, the new homeless shelter, SOS kitchen, and illegal dog beach are outside the scope of the Project; however, this comment will be considered by City Council in their review. Response to Comment 25-23: Please refer to Response to Comment 25-18. In order to determine the existing noise environment, 24- hour noise measurements were taken in the project vicinity. Noise Measurement Site 3 was located as near as 250 feet from the Villa Balboa condos and captured all large scale noise sources and would have captured any noise created from ambulances and helicopters that operated in the Project vicinity. The Hoag Hospital Cogen Plant and future Hoag Hospital campus expansion are outside the scope of this project; however, this comment will be considered by City Council in their review of the Project and CEQA document. Chambers Group, Inc. 141 21169 21-179 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California Comment Letter#26—Sandy Frizzell COMMENT LETTER #26 October 18, 2019 Newport Beach City Council 100 Civic Center Dr. Newport Beach, CA 92660 Re: Follow-up Proposed Dog Park at Sunset View Park To Whom It May Concern, Thank you for having the meeting Tuesday, Oct. 15 with those concerned about the proposed Dog Park at Sunset View Park. Many could not attend because of the venue and other issues. We appreciate each of you taking your time, providing valuable information; and listening and responding to our concerns Comment and thoughts. As was abundantly clear, we do not want a dog park in lower Sunset View 26-1 Park or anything else other than additional parking. Parking is very much needed for Sunset Ridge Park and parking in general for beach access. It was brought up at the meeting that the dirt mound is a place where visitors and residents alike go to enjoy the fabulous views. I have dozens of pictures of people enjoying the magnificent views from this dirt mound. We urge you to Comment consider enhancing it with a sturdy grass or ground covering to increase 26-2 enjoyment of this special area. In regard to the bridge, it seems a good idea, rather extravagant but with the added parking helpful to get people safely across the street to Sunset Ridge Park. I think it is important to keep Comment the bridge the lowest profile possible in style and color. I much prefer the Concrete Pedestrian 26-3 Bridge as apposed to the Steel Truss. What is most important is preserving; the dirt mound for residents and visitors Comment to continue to enjoy the incredible views. Please do not take this away. 26-4 Sandy Frizzell (Villa Balboa resident) 200 Paris Lane #214 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Chambers Group, Inc. 142 21169 21-180 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California Response To Comment Letter #26 — Sandy Frizzell Response to Comment 26-1: Thank you for your comment. Comment noted. Response to Comment 26-2: The City of Newport Beach General Plan designates public viewpoints for coastal views within the city. Areas near the Project site that have such designation include Sunset Ridge Park, Sunset View Park, and along the trail above the current parking lot, including the designated point where a bench was installed. The City's Local Coastal Plan also designates the same public view points in the designated parks and along the paved trail that fronts the Villa Balboa Community. Further, the bridge associated with the Project will provide safer unobstructed views of the coast. Response to Comment 26-3: The bridge options associated with the proposed Project were designed specifically to protect view lines and prevent visual obstruction of valuable coastal views. Response to Comment 26-4: Please refer to Response to Comment 26-2. Comment noted. Chambers Group, Inc. 143 21169 21-181 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beoch, California Comment Letter #27 — Doul; Tamkin COMMENT LETTER #27 From: Doug Tamkin <dtamkin@artivation.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 10:07 AM To: Tran, Andy Subject: Dog Park Initial Study Comments Attachments: BH Dog Park.JPG Dear Mr. Tran, The Draft Initial Study for the proposed dog park at lower Sunset View Park admits that it obtained its dog park noise data from the study that Beverly Hills did for their dog park. This "Draft Initial Study - Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Beverly Hills Dog Park Project" reveals that its author, Rincon Consultants, Inc., took its noise measurements at a "comparable off -leash dog park in Santa Barbara, California." So we have Newport Beach borrowing its assumptions from Beverly Hills, which based its assumptions on a dog park (at Tucker's Grove Park) in Santa Barbara. The six nearest residences to that Santa Barbara dog park range in distance from 150 feet to 300 feet, but are single-family homes that are shielded by abundant mature tree growth between them and the park. Of most concern, however, is that Newport Beach's assumptions are in essence only theoretical projections of how the noise from Comment barking dogs is predicted to combine with ambient noise levels. A real-world noise study has yet to be 27-1 conducted by NB that takes into account the actual perceptual impact the noise from the dog park will have on the residents adjacentto this unique location. Most of the data and conclusions compiled by all of these reports, including that of Newport Beach, appear to focus primarily on the impact of construction -related noise during a project's development, but then become more speculative with respect to the project's actual use. They fail to acknowledge the annoyance of, for example, barking dogs on a Sunday morning. Furthermore, ambient background noise levels are not constant, and frequently diminish enough for transient sounds, i.e. barking, to become prominent. The Beverly Hills dog park is surrounded almost completely by buildings that are commercial in nature, including an auto dealership, a city vehicle and facility maintenance center, an animal shelter/hospital and other businesses. The nearest residences are no closer than 650 feet from the dog park. All of this is on level ground, and the commercial buildings create a sound -blocking shield around the dog park that protects the residences from line -of -sight sound transmission. The only line -of -sight path is northward along Foothill Rd., but the very few homes at the end of that path are in excess of 700 feet away and are across heavily -traveled Santa Monica Blvd. This situation is hardly analogous the proposed location at Comment lower Sunset View Park. The uphill location of the facing residences at Villa Balboa presents numerous 27-2 unimpeded, line -of -sight opportunities for nuisance noise to be experienced by a large number of people. It will not be fair to these residents if their peace and quiet is ultimately compromised by assumptions drawn from a borrowed report on a very dissimilar set of specifics. At the very least, Newport Beach needs to devise their own testing methodology that attempts to replicate the actual conditions of the proposed site. (Attached is an image from Google Maps depicting the above-described line -of -sight sound path at Beverly Hills Dog Park.) Respectfully, DouglasTamkin Villa Balboa Chambers Group, Inc. 144 21169 21-182 i z _ i MercedesBenz`µ of Betrei! HiIIS• F' ,t M ^ o t:. _ Cartiin�reasl Con f ply MM1 �� % f€ " V■ Lt ZFI� t i €il! F_s Ba[lroam� ✓'�� Y Yssr'9���E'��5��� Mercedes Benz Young lsrae! o , '� �.ulnnt4r �zI,ICen' s ofaBeveriy Hif's y _ Be�erlHllis�Srnall , � , %70Ik,Hospi + � Lander 1 MapIDr, a_ I a J,I,i — P-1 eSS1. U, V NONE= P t , I �e�Se er,y-- 1 033 ;A/ 3rd ret aMeasure distanceZQ Click on the map to +QJ add to your pat?l IF Total distance: 755.13 ft (230A 6 m),,., Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beoch, California Response to Comment Letter #27 — Doug Tamkin Response to Comment 27-1: Thank you for your comment. The noise measurement locations were selected in order to obtain the ambient noise measurements at the locations that would experience the greatest noise increase from construction and/or operation of the proposed Project. No noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the Villa Balboa Condos, since the grade is relatively flat in the Sunset View Park area that covers the nearest 200 feet to the Villa Balboa Condos and then there is a steep slope to the Project site. The southwest edge of Sunset View Park will block the line -of -sight between the proposed Dog Park and the Villa Balboa Condos. The proposed dog park will be located more than 20 feet lower than the elevation at Sunset View Park. Since sound travels in straight lines, the southwest edge of Sunset View Park will effectively act like a 20 foot high sound wall between the proposed dog park and the condos. As such, only nominal construction noise impacts are anticipated to occur from the proposed project at the Villa Balboa Condos and no operational noise impacts from the proposed dog park or any other noise sources are anticipated to occur at the Villa Balboa Condos. Response to Comment 27-2: It is standard practice for CEQA documents to reference other CEQA documents that analyzed similar projects, such as the proposed dog park. Since the CEQA analysis for the Beverly Hill's Dog Park, utilized scientific methods and accepted noise analysis methodologies, the noise assumptions provided in the Beverly Hills Dog Park analysis provides a reasonable estimate of the noise impacts from the proposed dog park. It should be noted that the dog park noise at the nearest home was calculated based on the distance to the nearest Villa Balboa condo, however as detailed above, the line -of -sight between the Villa Balboa condos and the proposed dog park is blocked by the topography, as such the calculated dog park noise would actually be much lower at the nearest homes than what was presented in Table 4-24 of the Draft IS/MND. Chambers Group, Inc. 146 21169 21-184 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California SECTION 6.0 — REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION This errata section identifies changes made to the Draft MND to correct or clarify the information contained in the document. Changes made to the Draft MND are identified here in StFikeaut text to indicate deletions and bold italics to signify additions. Section 2.3.3, Dog Park Construction of the proposed Project would also include the installation of a fenced dog park with 6 -foot tall fences, separating large and small dogs, which may include benches and trash cans. The dog park will be 0.2 to 0.3 acres in size. The dog park would require a new water service for the water fountain and for irrigation. Security lighting at the dog park would be down -shielded to prevent light scatter. Hours at the dog park would be consistent with the Municipal Code which restricts park hours to between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. In addition, a shade structure may be installed at the dog park, approximately 10 to 15 feet in height. The top of the shade structure would be below the Sunset View Park ground elevation and would be designed to protect public coastal views. Based on comments received during the public review period for the Proposed Project, the City has developed some alternative designs for the dog park including the following: Option 1: Providing a passive recreation area adjacent to the parking lot, with similar earthwork and grading to the proposed Project. This alternative proposes a level area with natural turf adjacent to the parking lot. The 2:1 sloped area between the turf and upper Sunset View Park will be landscaped. The proposed fencing and shade structure and artificial turf included in the Dog Park alternative would also be eliminated with Option 1. Option 2: Providing a passive recreation area adjacent to upper level Sunset View Park that involves constructing terraced walls at the edge of the proposed parking location order to create a level, natural grass area adjacent to Upper Sunset View Park. The terraced areas in front of the walls would be sloped and landscaped. The proposed grass area will be an extension of Upper Sunset View Park and would be accessed from the existing walkway. This alternative requires less grading and earthwork than the proposed Project and Option 1, and reduces the amount of soil export. These alternatives concept designs are only for the recreational area element and will not impact the proposed conceptual design of the pedestrian and bicycle bridge or the parking lot, Section 4.1, Aesthetics a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project is construction of a bicycle and pedestrian bridge, new asphalt parking lot, and fenced dog park. The proposed bridge will span Superior Avenue from east to west by approximately 240 to 280 feet long, and 12 to 16 feet wide. The superstructure will be approximately 8 to 16 feet tall. The bottom of the superstructure will be approximately 17 to 25 feet above the asphalt surface of Superior Avenue. Depending on the structure type selection, the bridge may either be a single -span structure or a 3 -span structure. Two intermediate bridge supports on Superior Avenue will be required if a 3 -span structure is selected. The dog park may include a shade Chambers Group, Inc. 1417 21169 21-185 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California structure 10 to 15 feet in height and would be designed to protect public coastal views. Alternatively, if the City chooses to move forward with an option that keeps the knoll in place, a 20 foot high retaining wall would be required to support the new parking lot and existing knoll. This 20 foot high retaining wall will introduce a taller wall than was planned for the Proposed Project (an 8 -foot tall retaining wall). Although the higher retaining wall would introduce a larger man-made structure to the Project site, the introduction of retaining walls is largely consistent with the viewshed, which already contains views of the build environment. The City of Newport Beach provides a variety of coastal and scenic viewpoints. These views include open waters, sandy beaches, rocky shores, wetlands, canyons, and coastal bluffs. Because of the grid -like pattern of the streets and highways, coastal views can be seen in these areas, especially for north -south tending streets (City of Newport Beach 2017a). According to the City's General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, and Local Coastal Program, public viewpoints have been identified on southern end of Sunset Ridge Park along West Coast Highway (also known as State Route 1 or Pacific Coast Highway) and the northern perimeter of the proposed parking lot. Superior Avenue is also identified as a Coastal View Road (City of Newport Beach 2006). Policy 4.4.1-6 from the Local Coastal Program states that public coastal views must be protected from several roadway segments within the City of Newport Beach. This includes the roadway segment of Superior Avenue from Hospital Road to Coast Highway (City of Newport Beach 2017a). Section 4.3, Air Quality d) Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people?) Less than Significant Impact. Any diesel equipment used during construction of the proposed Project would consist of mobile equipment that would be changing locations, allowing the odors to disperse rapidly and not impact any nearby receptors. Should diesel equipment be required during maintenance at the proposed Project site, it would also change locations, allowing the odors to disperse rapidly and not impact any nearby receptors. Construction and operation of the proposed dog park could result in accumulation of pet waste; however, a regular maintenance schedule will ensure proper handling and removal of pet waste such that objectionable odors will not be allowed to accumulate. Similarly, as part of the dog park design, waste receptacles and bags will be provided for owners' use in maintaining the dog park. Use of bags to contain pet waste limit odors from penetrating beyond the boundaries of the dog park. Further, waste receptacles will be sited to avoid locations closestto residences, while maintaining convenient locations for dog park users. In addition, the proposed dog park would include eal synthetic turf specifically designed for dog parks, that would be wateFed daily irrigated, and the regular watering and the ^ of the to 4 would quickly break down any waste remnants including urine that would limit any remaining odors from penetrating the boundaries of the dog park. The Project site would not introduce any other objectionable odors. Therefore, construction and operation of the proposed Project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people, and impacts would be less than significant. Section 4.4, Biological Resources The location of the bridge abutment on the Sunset Ridge Park side of Superior Avenue is within a 5.15 -acre CSS planting area that was required as a special condition of the Sunset Ridge Park CDP (Special Condition 2.1.a). There may be some temporary construction impacts to this planting area, Chambers Group, Inc. 148 21169 21-186 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California which will be mitigated onsite (MM B10-4), with the impacted area replanted equivalent to existing conditions. Permanent impacts due to abutment location and shading from the bridge is calculated to be 0.02 acres (886 square feet). Permanent impacts to the CSS planting area will be mitigated offsite, but within Sunset Ridge Park. This will be at a 1:1 ratio with the intent of continuing to comply with the Special Condition of the Sunset Ridge Park CDP. Mitigation measures for direct impacts that may occur to sensitive plant species that may be present within the proposed Project footprint are listed below. MM 13I0-4: Artemisia californica-Eriogonum fasciculatum Shrubland located within the proposed Project footprint should be avoided to the greatest extent feasible. o Artemisia californica-Eriogonum fasciculatum Shrubland located within the proposed Project footprint, that may be avoided, shall be flagged or construction or silt fencing should be installed along the avoidable vegetation to delineate construction limits and to prevent encroachment into adjacent natural communities. o Any impacts to Artemisia californica-Eriogonum fasciculatum Shrubland which cannot be avoided will be mitigated through one of the following, in order of priority: ■ Onsite Mitigation: Any temporary impacts to CSS will be revegetated within the Sunset Ridge planted area, in areas that are not currently vegetated. Specifically, there is an opportunity for revegetation in an area outside of the delineated wetlands that, with approval from the Commission, could provide additive benefits to the Sunset Ridge Park planted area, immediately to the northeast of the Project site. This will provide a continuation of the CSS habitat previously revegetated onsite. The City will replant the area to be equivalent to existing conditions, which consists of superior high quality native vegetation with coverage of primarily CSS. If this area is not approved for revegetation by the Commission, alternative onsite mitigation opportunities will be evaluated. ■ Offsite Mitigation: Additive habitat assessment in the area adjacent to the project site within the replanted CSS would be provided to mitigate impacts from direct disturbance from the bridge structure and potential impacts from shading. The proposed Project will not result in significant impacts to sensitive plant species, as both temporary and permanent impacts will be mitigated as outlined above. Implementation of the listed mitigation measures will result in less than significant impacts to sensitive plant species and habitats within the proposed Project site. Impacts to areas determined by the Coastal Commission to be wetlands are discussed in item (b), below. (c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Less than Significant Impact. There are no riparian/riverine areas, vernal pools, or waters of the United States or State are present within the proposed Project footprint. Within the survey area Chambers Group, Inc. 149 21169 21-187 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California conducted for the jurisdictional delineation surveys, wetlands, as defined by the Coastal Act and the City's LCP were identified both on and off the Project site. Superior Avenue Wetlands There is one distinct wetland area located off site within relatively close proximity to the Proposed Project site, along the slope on the north side of Superior Avenue. The Superior Avenue wetland area is approximately 115 feet from its closest point to the permanent structures of the proposed bridge 6mpaet beundary is approximately 0.15 -acre in size. Staging, worker access, and vehicle movement would occur within the 100 foot boundary of the wetland area; however, this activity would be similar to existing vehicular and pedestrian traffic in the Project area. Per Title 21, Section 21.30B.040.0 of the City of Newport Beach Local Coastal Program (LCP) Implementation Plan: C. Wetland Buffers. A protective open space buffer shall be required to horizontally separate wetlands from development areas. Wetland buffers shall be of a sufficient size to ensure the biological integrity and preservation of the wetland. Wetlands shall have a minimum buffer width of one hundred (100) feet wherever possible. 1. Exception: Smaller wetland buffers may be allowed only where it can be demonstrated that: a. A one hundred (100) foot wide buffer is not possible due to site- specific constraints; and b. The proposed narrower buffer would be amply protective of the biological integrity of the wetland given the site-specific characteristics of the resource and of the type and intensity of disturbance." The Superior Avenue wetlands is outside of the 100 -foot buffer from the bridge's permanent structures. Further, the existing wetlands are already surrounded by a variety of on-going disturbances, primarily attributed to recreational and maintenance activities associated with the Sunset Ridge Park above and immediately adjacent to the wetlands, as well as the pedestrian and vehicle traffic adjoining the wetlands below. These on-going urban activities are less than 20 feet (and in some cases only a few feet away) from the wetlands. In addition, the wetlands are upslope from the proposed impact area, and moreover, the :.,+eRsity .,f the bFidge .,s+..,,,.+,en : bridge's permanent structures would be strictly confined to the identified impact area, which would be approximately 115 feet from the nearest point to the wetlands. Staging, worker access, and vehicle movement would occur within the 100 foot boundary of the wetland area; however, this activity would be similar to existing vehicular and pedestrian traffic in the Project area. To further obviate concerns regarding any unforeseen impacts to the wetlands, the limits of the wetlands will be clearly demarcated in the field priorto the commencement of construction activities, and a biologist shall monitor the construction work to ensure that encroachment into the wetlands does not occur. Also, the construction contractor should install a suitable barrier (e.g., snow fencing) that is clearly visible to construction personnel, particularly any construction equipment operators, to prevent any incidental construction impacts to these jurisdictional wetland areas. Chambers Group, Inc. 21169 150 21-188 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California Therefore, given the information above, it is reasonable to conclude that the proposed bridge construction activities would not temporarily or permanently impact those wetlands nor jeopardize the biological integrity or preservation of the wetlands. Following its completion, the pedestrian and bicycle bridge over Superior Avenue is not expected to create any adverse shading impacts to the existing wetlands identified upslope along the north side of Superior Avenue because of the distance the bridge will be from the nearest point to the wetlands (i.e., 115+ feet). Chambers Group, Inc. 151 21169 21-189 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California SECTION 7.0 — MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION This document, along with the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and the Notice of Determination, constitute the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rincon Development Project in the City of Chino Hills. Pursuant to Section 21082.1 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the City has independently reviewed and analyzed the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Proposed Project and finds that these documents reflect the independent judgment of the City. The City of Chino Hills, as lead agency, also confirms that the project mitigation measures detailed in these documents are feasible and will be implemented as stated in the MND and MMRP. Signature Printed Name Date Title Chambers Group, Inc. 152 21169 21-190 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California SECTION 8.0 — REFERENCES Baldwin, B.G., D.H. Goldman, D.J. Keil, R. Patterson, T.J. Rosatti, and D.H. Wilken (editors) 2012 The Jepson Manual, Vascular Plants of California. University of California Press. Second Edition. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) 2018 Height and Low Clearances. Accessed May 2019. http://www.dot.ca.gov/trafficops/­­trucks/­height.htmI City of Newport Beach 2005 Environmental Study Areas Map. Local Coastal Program; Coastal Land Use Plan. Available online at: https://www.newportbeachca.gov/PLN/LCP/LCP 2005 CLUP/MAP4- 1LCP05 ESA.pdf 2006 General Plan. Available online at: https://www.newportbeachca.gov/PLN/General Plan/COMPLETE FEB 2019/General P Ian 2006 Complete.pdf 2009 Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Sunset Ridge Park Project. Banning Ranch Conservancy 2013 Energy Action Plan 2017a Coastal Land Use Plan. Available online at: https://www.newportbeachca.gov/PLN/LCP/Internet%20PDFs//CLUP Cover%20and%2 0Ta ble% 20of% 20Contents. pdf 2017b Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan. Available online at: https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/NewportBeach/html/pdfs/NewportBeach2l.pdf 2019a Newport Beach Municipal Code. Accessed May 2019. https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/NewportBeach/­­ 2019b Municipal Operations — Parks and Trees 2019c Water Master Plan 2019d Capital Improvement Program Proposed for Fiscal Year 2019-20 Department of Conservation (DOC) 1981 Generalized Aggregate Resource Classification Map. Orange County — Temescal Valley and Adjacent Production. California Division of Mines and Geology. 2004 Agricultural Preserves. Williamson Act Parcels. Chambers Group, Inc. 153 21169 21-191 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking tot Project Newport Beach, California 2019 Data Viewer. DOC Maps. Accessed May 2019. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/dataviewer/ Department of Transportation (DOT) 2019b California Scenic Highway Mapping System. Available online at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16 livability/scenic highways/ Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Google 2019 EnviroStor. Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List (Cortese). Accessed May 2019. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov 2019 Google Maps. Accessed May 2019. https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5081521,- 117.3263889,14z Gray, J. and D. Bramlet 1992 Habitat Classification System, Natural Resources, Geographic Information System (GIS) Project. County of Orange Environmental Management Agency, Santa Ana, CA. Holland, R.F. 1986 Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game, Natural Heritage Division, Sacramento, CA. Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) 2005 Watershed G Drainage Map Orange County Water District (OCWD) 2018 Well Locations Map 2015 Groundwater Management Plan Sawyer, J.O., T. Keeler -Wolf, and J. M. Evens 2009 A Manual of California Vegetation, 2nd edition. California Native Plant Society Press, Sacramento, CA. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. Appendix IV -B. CARB's Mobile Source Strategy State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) 2014 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NDPES) Permit. Order No. R8-2014- 0002. NPDES Permit No. CAS 618030. Accessed June 2019. Chambers Group, Inc. 154 21169 21-192 Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Newport Beach, California https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/santaana/water issues/programs/stormwater/docs/o cperm it/2014/D raft R8-2014-0002.pdf 2019 GeoTracker Database. Accessed May 2019. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2019 Natural Resources Conservation Service. Web Soil Survey. Accessed May 2019. https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx United States Geological Survey (USGS) 2019 U.S. Quaternary Faults Map. Accessed May 2019. https://usgs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/­­`webappviewer/index.html Chambers Group, Inc. 155 21169 21-193 Exhibit "C" Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND2019-002 (PA2019-014) - State Clearinghouse Number 2019099074 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM SUPERIOR AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE BRIDGE AND PARKING LOT PROJECT Newport Beach, CA (Orange County) Prepared for: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Prepared by: CHAMBERS /jhN GROUP 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 750 Santa Ana, California 92707 November 2019 21-195 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Public Resources Code, Section 21081.6 (Assembly Bill 3180) requires that mitigation measures identified in environmental review documents prepared in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) are implemented after a project is approved. Therefore, this Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared to ensure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures during the construction phase of Superior Avenue Pedestrian And Bicycle Bridge And Parking Lot Project. The City of Newport Beach (City) is the agency responsible for implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the MND. This MMRP provides the City with a convenient mechanism for quickly reviewing all the mitigation measures including the ability to focus on select information such as timing. The MMRP includes the following information for each mitigation measure: • The phase of the project during which the required mitigation measure must be implemented; • The phase of the project during which the required mitigation measure must be monitored; and • The enforcement agency. The MMRP includes a checklist to be used duringthe mitigation monitoring period. The checklist will verify the name of the monitor, the date of the monitoring activity, and any related remarks for each mitigation measure. 21-196 mow icat resources - - - MM BIO -1: Project -related activities likely to have the potential to disturb suitable Pre- Pre- City of Newport Beach Less than bird nesting habitat shall be prohibited from February 15 through August 31, unless Construction/Construction Construction/Construction Significant a Project Biologist acceptable to the City of Newport Beach surveys the Project area prior to disturbance to confirm the absence of active nests. Disturbance shall be defined as any activity that physically removes and/or damages vegetation or habitat - or any action that may cause disruption of nesting behavior such as loud noise from equipment. and/or. artificial night lighting. Surveys shall be conducted weekly, beginning no earlier than 30 days and ending no later than 3 days prior to the commencement of disturbance. If an active nest is discovered, disturbance within a particular buffer shall be prohibited until nesting is complete; the buffer distance shall be determined by the Biologist in consideration of species sensitivity and existing nest site conditions. Limits of avoidance shall be demarcated with flagging or fencing. The Biologist shall record the results of the recommended protective measures described above and shall submit a memo summarizing any nest avoidance measures to the City of Newport Beach to document compliance with applicable State and federal laws pertaining to the protection. of native birds. Similarly, for preserved vegetation that occurs within 50 to 100 feet of construction activities, if construction is occurring during the nesting season, preserved vegetation shall be surveyed for the presence of nesting birds. MM BIO -2: Flag or install construction fencing or silt fencing along the proposed Pre- Pre- City of Newport Beach Less than Project boundaries to delineate construction limits and to prevent encroachment Construction/Construction Construction/Construction Significant into adjacent natural communities. The limits of both the Superior and West Coast Highway wetlands will be clearly demarcated in the field and all on-site construction personnel will be informed about the wetland avoidance area prior to the commencement of construction activities. The construction contractor will install a solid protective barrier that is clearly visible to construction personnel, particularly any construction equipment operators, and that prevents any incidental discharge of soil or debris into the jurisdictional wetlands. Furthermore, a biologist will monitor the construction work to ensure that encroachment into the wetlands does not occur. MM BI0-3: Gravel bags should be placed along the tops of the v -ditches in order to Construction Construction City of Newport Beach Less than minimize erosion and to prevent construction debris and potentially hazardous Significant materials from entering the waterway during a rain event. 21-197 •-••-• -• wuwnuw-cnoyunum Ja5ClCalaIDm �nrualano, a type of Pre- Pre - Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS), located within the proposed Project footprint should be Construction/Construction Construction/Construction avoided to the greatest extent feasible. • Artemisia californica-Eriogonum fasciculatum Shrubland located within the proposed Project footprint, that may be avoided, shall be flagged or construction or silt fencing should be installed along the avoidable vegetation to delineate construction limits and to prevent encroachment into adjacent natural communities. • Any impacts to Artemisia californica-Eriogonum fasciculatum Shrubland which cannot be avoided will be mitigated through one of the following, in order of priority: o Onsite Mitigation: Any temporary impacts to CSS will be revegetated within the Sunset Ridge planted area, in areas that are not currently vegetated. Specifically, there is an opportunity for revegetation in an area outside of the delineated wetlands that, with approval from the Commission, could provide additive benefits to the Sunset Ridge Park planted area, immediately to the northeast of the Project site along Superior Avenue. This will provide continuation of the CSS habitat previously revegetated onsite. The City will replant the area to be equivalent to existing conditions, which consists of superior high- quality native vegetation with coverage of primarily CSS. If this area is not approved for revegetation by the Commission, alternative onsite mitigation opportunities will be evaluated. o Offsite Mitigation: Additive habitat assessment in the area adjacent to the project site within the replanted CSS would be provided to mitigate impacts from direct disturbance from the bridge structure and potential impacts from shading. . ­„ t; w np...an or me construction activities, the City will conduct Post -Construction Post -Construction City of Newport Beach monthly monitoring of the West Coast Highway wetlands to evaluate and document - the associated conditions to determine if any unforeseen impacts from the proposed construction activities are occurring. This monthly monitoring will continue for up to one year, or until such time as it can be sufficiently demonstrated that the wetlands will continue to persist in perpetuity. If it is determined during post -construction monitoring that construction has resulted in an unexpected impact to the wetlands, appropriate remedial actions will be implemented by the City. For instance, an unforeseen disruption or obstruction of subsurface hydrology to the wetlands may warrant the City+s provision of an alternative water source that would continue to supply sufficient water to sustain the wetlands. Lessthan Significant Less than Significant 21-198 21-199 AND REPORTING Mitigation Measure SUPERIOR AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE BRIDGE AND PARKING LOT PROJECT of Implementation Phase Monitoring Phase Enforcement Agency _F Level Verification of C f ompliance Significance After it Date Remarks tio n MM CUL -1: If archaeological or paleontological resources are discovered during Construction Construction City of Newport Beach Lessthan construction, all construction activities in the general area of the discovery shall be Significant temporarily halted until the resource is examined by a qualified monitor, retained by the Developer. The monitor shall recommend next steps (i.e., additional excavation, curation,preservation, etc.). Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.. MM CUL -2: During proposed Project construction, activities will be halted, and an Construction Construction City of Newport Beach Less than archaeologist must be available to evaluate the find. If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further Significant disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the County Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely. Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. MM PALEO-1: All project -related ground disturbance that could potential impact the Construction Construction City of Newport Beach Less than Monterey Formation and the Old Paralic Deposits will be monitored by a qualified Significant paleontological monitor on a full-time basis, asthese geologic units are determined to have a high paleontological sensitivity. Project -related excavations that occur in surficial younger alluvial deposits (not mapped in the current study area but existing in the vicinity) will be monitored. on a part-time basis to ensure that underlying paleontologically sensitive sediments are not being impacted. Excavations exceeding 5 feet in. depth in Quaternary alluvium will be monitored on a full-time basis. MM PALEO-2: A qualified paleontologist will be retained to supervise monitoring of Construction Construction City of Newport Beach Less than construction excavations and to produce a Paleontological Monitoring and Significant Mitigation Plan for the proposed project. Paleontological resource monitoring will include inspection of exposed rock units during active excavations within sensitive geologic sediments. The monitor will have authority to temporarily divert grading away from exposed fossils and halt construction activities in the immediate vicinity in order to professionally and efficiently recover the fossil specimens and collect associated data. The qualified paleontologist will prepare progress reports to be filed with the lead agency. MM PALEO-3: At each fossil locality, field data forms will be used to record pertinent Construction Construction City of Newport Beach Less than geologic data, stratigraphic sections will be measured, and appropriate sediment _ Significant samples will be collected and submitted for analysis. MM PALEO-4: Matrixsampling would be conducted to test for the presence of Construction Construction City of Newport Beach Less than microfossils. Testing for microfossils would consist of screen -washing small samples Significant (approximately 200 pounds) to determine if significant fossils are present. If microfossils are present, additional matrix samples will be collected '(up to a maximum of 6,000 pounds per locality to ensure recovery of a scientifically significant microfossil sample). 21-199 MM PALEO-S: Recovered fossils will be prepared to the point of curation, identified by qualified experts, listed in a databaseto facilitate analysis, and reposited in a designated paleontological curation facility. The most likely repository. is the SDNHM. Hazards and Hazardous Materials City Significant burl rwc-a: Any contaminated soils or other hazardous materials removed from the proposed Project site shall be transported only by. a Licensed Hazardous Construction Construction City of Newport Beach Less than Waste Hauler who shall be in compliance with all applicable State and federal requirements, Significant including U.S. Department of Transportation regulations under Title 49 of the CFR (Hazardous Materials Transportation Act), California Department of Transportation standards, Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 United States Code §6901 et seq.). The City of Newport Beach Public Works and Community Development Departments shall verify that only Licensed Haulers who are operating in compliance with regulatory requirements are used to haul hazardous materials. Tribal Cultural Resources rvrrvr mrc -1: rnor to issuance of any grading permit, the Applicant shall provide satisfactory evidence that a Native American monitor (i.e., Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians -Kith Nation), has been retained to observe ground disturbance Pre -Construction Pre -Construction City of Newport Beach Less than Significant activities during grading and excavation. In the event that tribal cultural resources are discovered, the Native American monitor shall be included in the consultation on the recommended next steps. 21-200 ATTACHMENT H PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DOKKEN ENGINEERING FOR SUPERIOR AVENUE OVERCROSSING AND PARKING LOT PROJECT FINAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of this 19th day of November, 2019 ("Effective Date"), by and between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a California municipal corporation and charter city ("City"), and DOKKEN ENGINEERING, a California corporation ("Consultant"), whose address is 1450 Frazee Road, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92108, and is made with reference to the following: RECITALS A. City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is now being conducted under the statutes of the State of California and the Charter of City. B. City desires to engage Consultant to provide final design and engineering services for the Superior Avenue Overcrossing and Parking Lot ("Project"). C. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the professional services described in this Agreement. D. City has solicited and received a proposal from Consultant, has reviewed the previous experience and evaluated the expertise of Consultant, and desires to retain Consultant to render professional services under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows: 1. TERM The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date, and shall terminate on December 31, 2023, unless terminated earlier as set forth herein. 2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED Consultant shall diligently perform all the services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference ("Services" or "Work"). City may elect to delete certain Services within the Scope of Services at its sole discretion. 3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE 3.1 Time is of the essence in the performance of Services under this Agreement and Consultant shall perform the Services in accordance with the schedule included in 21-201 Exhibit A. In the absence of a specific schedule, the Services shall be performed to completion in a diligent and timely manner. The failure by Consultant to strictly adhere to the schedule set forth in Exhibit A, if any, or perform the Services in a diligent and timely manner may result in termination of this Agreement by City. 3.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant shall not be responsible for delays due to causes beyond Consultant's reasonable control. However, in the case of any such delay in the Services to be provided for the Project, each party hereby agrees to provide notice within two (2) calendar days of the occurrence causing the delay to the other party so that all delays can be addressed. 3.3 Consultant shall submit all requests for extensions of time for performance in writing to the Project Administrator as defined herein not later than ten (10) calendar days after the start of the condition that purportedly causes a delay. The Project Administrator shall review all such requests and may grant reasonable time extensions for unforeseeable delays that are beyond Consultant's control. 3.4 For all time periods not specifically set forth herein, Consultant shall respond in the most expedient and appropriate manner under the circumstances, by hand -delivery or mail. 4. COMPENSATION TO CONSULTANT 4.1 City shall pay Consultant for the Services on a time and expense not -to - exceed basis in accordance with the provisions of this Section and the Schedule of Billing Rates attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant's compensation for all Work performed in accordance with this Agreement, including all reimbursable items and subconsultant fees, shall not exceed Nine Hundred Nineteen Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety Dollars and 00/100 ($919,890.00), without prior written authorization from City. No billing rate changes shall be made during the term of this Agreement without the prior written approval of City. 4.2 Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City describing the Work performed the preceding month. Consultant's bills shall include the name of the person who performed the Work, a brief description of the Services performed and/or the specific task in the Scope of Services to which it relates, the date the Services were performed, the number of hours spent on all Work billed on an hourly basis, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than thirty (30) calendar days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff. 4.3 City shall reimburse Consultant only for those costs or expenses specifically identified in Exhibit B to this Agreement or specifically approved in writing in advance by City. 4.4 Consultant shall not receive any compensation for Extra Work performed without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any Work that is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not included within the Scope of Services and which the parties did not Dokken Engineering Page 2 21-202 reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Compensation for any authorized Extra Work shall be paid in accordance with the Schedule of Billing Rates as set forth in Exhibit B. 5. PROJECT MANAGER 5.1 Consultant shall designate a Project Manager, who shall coordinate all phases of the Project. This Project Manager shall be available to City at all reasonable times during the Agreement term. Consultant has designated John Klemunes to be its Project Manager. Consultant shall not remove or reassign the Project Manager or any personnel listed in Exhibit A or assign any new or replacement personnel to the Project without the prior written consent of City. City's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld with respect to the removal or assignment of non -key personnel. 5.2 Consultant, at the sole discretion of City, shall remove from the Project any of its personnel assigned to the performance of Services upon written request of City. Consultant warrants that it will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to complete the Project on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement. 5.3 If Consultant is performing inspection services for City, the Project Manager and any other assigned staff shall be equipped with a cellular phone to communicate with City staff. The Project Manager's cellular phone number shall be provided to City. 6. ADMINISTRATION This Agreement will be administered by the Public Works Department. City's Public Works Director or designee shall be the Project Administrator and shall have the authority to act for City under this Agreement. The Project Administrator shall represent City in all matters pertaining to the Services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement. 7. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES To assist Consultant in the execution of its responsibilities under this Agreement, City agrees to provide access to and upon request of Consultant, one copy of all existing relevant information on file at City. City will provide all such materials in a timely manner so as not to cause delays in Consultant's Work schedule. 8. STANDARD OF CARE 8.1 All of the Services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant's supervision. Consultant represents that it possesses the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services required by this Agreement, and that it will perform all Services in a manner commensurate with community professional standards and with the ordinary degree of skill and care that would be used by other reasonably competent practitioners of the same discipline under similar circumstances. All Services shall be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who are not employed by City. By delivery of completed Work, Consultant certifies that the Work conforms to the Dokken Engineering Page 3 21-203 requirements of this Agreement, all applicable federal, state and local laws, and legally recognized professional standards. 8.2 Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has, shall obtain, and shall keep in full force and effect during the term hereof, at its sole cost and expense, all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature that is legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Newport Beach business license during the term of this Agreement. 8.3 Consultant shall not be responsible for delay, nor shall Consultant be responsible for damages or be in default or deemed to be in default by reason of strikes, lockouts, accidents, acts of God, or the failure of City to furnish timely information or to approve or disapprove Consultant's Work promptly, or delay or faulty performance by City, contractors, or governmental agencies. 9. HOLD HARMLESS 9.1 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, volunteers, employees and any person or entity owning or otherwise in legal control of the property upon which Consultant performs the Project and/or Services contemplated by this (collectively, the "Indemnified Parties), from and against any and all claims (including, without limitation, claims for bodily injury, death or damage to property), demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever (individually, a Claim; collectively, "Claims"), and which relate (directly or indirectly) to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant or its principals, officers, agents, employees, vendors, suppliers, subconsultants, subcontractors, anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them or for whose acts they may be liable, or any or all of them. 9.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall be construed to require Consultant to indemnify the Indemnified Parties from any Claim arising from the sole negligence, active negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties. Nothing in this indemnity shall be construed as authorizing any award of attorneys' fees in any action on or to enforce the terms of this Agreement. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by the Consultant. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR It is understood that City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and Consultant is not an agent or employee of City. The manner and means of conducting the Work are under the control of Consultant, except to the extent they are limited by statute, rule or regulation and the expressed terms of this Agreement. No civil Dokken Engineering Page 4 21-204 service status or other right of employment shall accrue to Consultant or its employees. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute approval for Consultant or any of Consultant's employees or agents, to be the agents or employees of City. Consultant shall have the responsibility for and control over the means of performing the Work, provided that Consultant is in compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Anything in this Agreement that may appear to give City the right to direct Consultant as to the details of the performance of the Work or to exercise a measure of control over Consultant shall mean only that Consultant shall follow the desires of City with respect to the results of the Services. 11. COOPERATION Consultant agrees to work closely and cooperate fully with City's designated Project Administrator and any other agencies that may have jurisdiction or interest in the Work to be performed. City agrees to cooperate with the Consultant on the Project. 12. CITY POLICY Consultant shall discuss and review all matters relating to policy and Project direction with City's Project Administrator in advance of all critical decision points in order to ensure the Project proceeds in a manner consistent with City goals and policies. 13. PROGRESS Consultant is responsible for keeping the Project Administrator informed on a regular basis regarding the status and progress of the Project, activities performed and planned, and any meetings that have been scheduled or are desired. 14. INSURANCE Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of Work, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement or for other periods as specified in this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type, amounts, terms and conditions described in the Insurance Requirements attached hereto as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by reference. 15. PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENTS AND TRANSFERS Except as specifically authorized under this Agreement, the Services to be provided under this Agreement shall not be assigned, transferred contracted or subcontracted out without the prior written approval of City. Any of the following shall be construed as an assignment: The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Consultant, or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member or cotenant if Consultant is a partnership or joint -venture or syndicate or co -tenancy, which shall result in changing the control of Consultant. Control means fifty percent (50%) or more of the voting power or twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the assets of the corporation, partnership or joint -venture. Dokken Engineering Page 5 21-205 16. SUBCONTRACTING The subcontractors authorized by City, if any, to perform Work on this Project are identified in Exhibit A. Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts and omissions of any subcontractor. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law. City is an intended beneficiary of any Work performed by the subcontractor for purposes of establishing a duty of care between the subcontractor and City. Except as specifically authorized herein, the Services to be provided under this Agreement shall not be otherwise assigned, transferred, contracted or subcontracted out without the prior written approval of City. 17. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 17.1 Each and every report, draft, map, record, plan, document and other writing produced, including but not limited to, websites, blogs, social media accounts and applications (hereinafter "Documents"), prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors, in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the exclusive property of City, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or any other party. Additionally, all material posted in cyberspace by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors, in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the exclusive property of City, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such Documents, including all logins and password information to City upon prior written request. 17.2 Documents, including drawings and specifications, prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by City or others on any other project. Any use of completed Documents for other projects and any use of incomplete Documents without specific written authorization from Consultant will be at City's sole risk and without liability to Consultant. Further, any and all liability arising out of changes made to Consultant's deliverables under this Agreement by City or persons other than Consultant is waived against Consultant, and City assumes full responsibility for such changes unless City has given Consultant prior notice and has received from Consultant written consent for such changes. 17.3 CADD data delivered to City shall include the professional stamp of the engineer or architect in charge of or responsible for the Work. City agrees that Consultant shall not be liable for claims, liabilities or losses arising out of, or connected with (a) the modification or misuse by City, or anyone authorized by City, of CADD data; (b) the decline of accuracy or readability of CADD data due to inappropriate storage conditions or duration; or (c) any use by City, or anyone authorized by City, of CADD data for additions to this Project, for the completion of this Project by others, or for any other Project, excepting only such use as is authorized, in writing, by Consultant. By acceptance of CADD data, City agrees to indemnify Consultant for damages and liability Dokken Engineering Page 6 21-206 resulting from the modification or misuse of such CADD data. All original drawings shall be submitted to City in the version of AutoCAD used by the City in .dwg file format, on a CD, and should comply with the City's digital submission requirements for improvement plans available from the City's Public Works Department. The City will provide Consultant with City title sheets as AutoCAD file(s) in .dwg file format. All written documents shall be transmitted to City in formats compatible with Microsoft Office and/or viewable with Adobe Acrobat. 17.4 All improvement and/or construction plans shall be prepared with indelible waterproof ink or electrostatically plotted on standard twenty-four inch (24") by thirty-six inch (36") Mylar with a minimum thickness of three (3) mils. Consultant shall provide to City 'As -Built' drawings and a copy of digital Computer Aided Design and Drafting ("CADD") and Tagged Image File Format (.tiff) files of all final sheets within ninety (90) days after finalization of the Project. For more detailed requirements, a copy of the City of Newport Beach Standard Design Requirements is available from the City's Public Works Department. 18. OPINION OF COST Any opinion of the construction cost prepared by Consultant represents the Consultant's judgment as a design professional and is supplied for the general guidance of City. Since Consultant has no control over the cost of labor and material, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Consultant does not guarantee the accuracy of such opinions as compared to Consultant or contractor bids or actual cost to City. 19. CONFIDENTIALITY All Documents, including drafts, preliminary drawings or plans, notes and communications that result from the Services in this Agreement, shall be kept confidential unless City expressly authorizes in writing the release of information. 20. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNITY Consultant shall defend and indemnify City, its agents, officers, representatives and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement or alleged infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright, including costs, contained in Consultant's Documents provided under this Agreement. 21. RECORDS Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the Services to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any Services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City, for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City to examine, audit and make transcripts or copies of such records and invoices during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow Dokken Engineering Page 7 21-207 inspection of all Work, data, Documents, proceedings and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. 22. WITHHOLDINGS City may withhold payment to Consultant of any disputed sums until satisfaction of the dispute with respect to such payment. Such withholding shall not be deemed to constitute a failure to pay according to the terms of this Agreement. Consultant shall not discontinue Work as a result of such withholding. Consultant shall have an immediate right to appeal to the City Manager or designee with respect to such disputed sums. Consultant shall be entitled to receive interest on any withheld sums at the rate of return that City earned on its investments during the time period, from the date of withholding of any amounts found to have been improperly withheld. 23. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS In the event of errors or omissions that are due to the negligence or professional inexperience of Consultant which result in expense to City greater than what would have resulted if there were not errors or omissions in the Work accomplished by Consultant, the additional design, construction and/or restoration expense shall be borne by Consultant. Nothing in this Section is intended to limit City's rights under the law or any other sections of this Agreement. 24. CITY'S RIGHT TO EMPLOY OTHER CONSULTANTS City reserves the right to employ other Consultants in connection with the Project. 25. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 25.1 Consultant or its employees may be subject to the provisions of the California Political Reform Act of 1974 (the "Act") and/or Government Code §§ 1090 et seq., which (1) require such persons to disclose any financial interest that may foreseeably be materially affected by the Work performed under this Agreement, and (2) prohibit such persons from making, or participating in making, decisions that will foreseeably financially affect such interest. 25.2 If subject to the Act and/or Government Code §§ 1090 et seq., Consultant shall conform to all requirements therein. Failure to do so constitutes a material breach and is grounds for immediate termination of this Agreement by City. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City for any and all claims for damages resulting from Consultant's violation of this Section. 26. NOTICES 26.1 All notices, demands, requests or approvals, including any change in mailing address, to be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be given in writing, and conclusively shall be deemed served when delivered personally, or on the third Dokken Engineering Page 8 21-208 business day after the deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid, first- class mail, addressed as hereinafter provided. 26.2 All notices, demands, requests or approvals from Consultant to City shall be addressed to City at: Attn: Public Works Director Public Works Department City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive PO Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658 26.3 All notices, demands, requests or approvals from City to Consultant shall be addressed to Consultant at: Attn: John Klemunes Dokken Engineering 1450 Frazee Road, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92108 27. CLAIMS 27.1 Unless a shorter time is specified elsewhere in this Agreement, before making its final request for payment under this Agreement, Consultant shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement. Consultant's acceptance of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement except those previously made in writing and identified by Consultant in writing as unsettled at the time of its final request for payment. Consultant and City expressly agree that in addition to any claims filing requirements set forth in the Agreement, Consultant shall be required to file any claim Consultant may have against City in strict conformance with the Government Claims Act (Government Code sections 900 et seq.). 27.2 To the extent that Consultant's claim is a "Claim" as defined in Public Contract Code section 9204 or any successor statute thereto, the Parties agree to follow the dispute resolution process set forth therein. Any part of such "Claim" remaining in dispute after completion of the dispute resolution process provided for in Public Contract Code section 9204 or any successor statute thereto shall be subject to the Government Claims Act requirements requiring Consultant to file a claim in strict conformance with the Government Claims Act. To the extent that Contractor/Consultant's claim is not a "Claim" as defined in Public Contract Code section 9204 or any successor statute thereto, Consultant shall be required to file such claim with the City in strict conformance with the Government Claims Act (Government Code sections 900 et seq.). Dokken Engineering Page 9 21-209 28. TERMINATION 28.1 In the event that either party fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement at the time and in the manner required, that party shall be deemed in default in the performance of this Agreement. If such default is not cured within a period of two (2) calendar days, or if more than two (2) calendar days are reasonably required to cure the default and the defaulting party fails to give adequate assurance of due performance within two (2) calendar days after receipt of written notice of default, specifying the nature of such default and the steps necessary to cure such default, and thereafter diligently take steps to cure the default, the non -defaulting party may terminate the Agreement forthwith by giving to the defaulting party written notice thereof. 28.2 Notwithstanding the above provisions, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement at any time by giving no less than seven (7) calendar days' prior written notice to Consultant. In the event of termination under this Section, City shall pay Consultant for Services satisfactorily performed and costs incurred up to the effective date of termination for which Consultant has not been previously paid. On the effective date of termination, Consultant shall deliver to City all reports, Documents and other information developed or accumulated in the performance of this Agreement, whether in draft or final form. 29. PREVAILING WAGES 29.1 Pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Labor Code of the State of California, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages including legal holidays and overtime Work for each craft or type of workman needed to execute the Work contemplated under the Agreement shall be paid to all workmen employed on the Work to be done according to the Agreement by the Consultant and any subcontractor. In accordance with the California Labor Code (Sections 1770 et seq.), the Director of Industrial Relations has ascertained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages in the locality in which the Work is to be performed for each craft, classification, or type of workman or mechanic needed to execute the Agreement. A copy of said determination is available by calling the prevailing wage hotline number (415) 703-4774, and requesting one from the Department of Industrial Relations. The Consultant is required to obtain the wage determinations from the Department of Industrial Relations and post at the job site the prevailing rate or per diem wages. It shall be the obligation of the Consultant or any subcontractor under him/her to comply with all State of California labor laws, rules and regulations and the parties agree that the City shall not be liable for any violation thereof. 29.2 Unless otherwise exempt by law, Consultant warrants that no contractor or subcontractor was listed on the bid proposal for the Services that it is not currently registered and qualified to perform public work. Consultant further warrants that it is currently registered and qualified to perform "public work" pursuant to California Labor Code section 1725.5 or any successor statute thereto and that no contractor or subcontractor will engage in the performance of the Services unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work. Dokken Engineering Page 10 21-210 30. STANDARD PROVISIONS 30.1 Recitals. City and Consultant acknowledge that the above Recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement. 30.2 Compliance with all Laws. Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, comply with all statutes, ordinances, regulations and requirements of all governmental entities, including federal, state, county or municipal, whether now in force or hereinafter enacted. In addition, all Work prepared by Consultant shall conform to applicable City, county, state and federal laws, rules, regulations and permit requirements and be subject to approval of the Project Administrator and City. 30.3 Waiver. A waiver by either party of any breach, of any term, covenant or condition contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant or condition contained herein, whether of the same or a different character. 30.4 Integrated Contract. This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions herein. 30.5 Conflicts or Inconsistencies. In the event there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement and the Scope of Services or any other attachments attached hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 30.6 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of the Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply. 30.7 Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 30.8 Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 30.9 Controlling Law and Venue. The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement and all matters relating to it and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be adjudicated in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Orange, State of California. 30.10 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because race, religious creed, color, national origin, Dokken Engineering Page 11 21-211 ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, age or any other impermissible basis under law. 30.11 No Attorneys' Fees. In the event of any dispute or legal action arising under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall not be entitled to attorneys' fees. 30.12 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two (2) or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one (1) and the same instrument. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] Dokken Engineering Page 12 21-212 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the dates written below. APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Date: It 20 i By: J'y_' Fnr-'Aaron C. Harp �A City Attorney ATTEST: Date: :� Leilani I. Brown City Clerk CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a California municipal corporation Date: By: Diane B Mayor Dixon CONSULTANT: Dokken Engineering, a California corporation Date: By: Richard A. Dokken Chief Executive Officer Date- ate: By- By: Bradley Bradley B. Dokken Chief Financial Officer [END OF SIGNATURES] Attachments: Exhibit A — Scope of Services Exhibit B — Schedule of Billing Rates Exhibit C — Insurance Requirements Dokken Engineering Page 13 21-213 EXHIBIT SCOPE OF SERVICES Dokken Engineering Page A-1 21-214 �Ewpa�� 01 �AtrsonK�P EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT & CALTRANS COORDINATION SUPERIOR AVENUE OVERCROSSING AND PARKING LOT Task 1.1 Project Kickoff and Agency Coordination Meetings Dokken Engineering, referred to as "Dokken" throughout this Scope of Work, will coordinate meetings with the City, the City's consultants (TyLin, Urban Resource, Chambers Group) and key stakeholders to facilitate decision making. For each meeting, Dokken will provide meeting notices, prepare meeting materials and agenda, facilitate the meeting and prepare meeting minutes. Dokken will consult with the City's project manager prior to each meeting to review upcoming meeting items. The following meetings are anticipated for this project: Kickoff Meeting (1): At the start of the project, Dokken will organize a kickoff meeting with all key personnel, design team members and stakeholder representatives on the project. The purpose of this meeting is to review the goals and objectives of the project, discuss each team member's roles and responsibilities and identify critical project issues. PDT Meetings (11): The project development team (PDT) meeting, will be scheduled monthly to review project status and discuss items that require City decisions. Attendees are anticipated to include City staff, Dokken Project Manager, as well as consultant task leads and other stakeholders as necessary to facilitate resolutions. City Council Meetings (2): Dokken will attend and present the proposed improvements at City Council meetings. Task 1.2 Project Schedules and Administration Dokken will monitor and control the effort and progress of the proposed services as follows: 1) Set up an internal project accounting system; 2) Prepare monthly Progress Reports indicating work accomplished the previous month, anticipated work to be completed the next month, issues requiring resolution, milestones achieved, meetings held, actions taken, approval actions required, coordination issues and design schedule impacts to accompany client invoices; and 3) Prepare, monitor and adjust Critical Path Method (CPM) Schedule on a monthly basis. Task 1.3 Data Collection, Site Visits, and General Coordination Dokken will obtain and review all available documents to identify design controls and considerations necessary to support the project. These documents include, but are not limited to, aerial and street view exhibits, concept plan and renderings developed, traffic and pedestrian counts, parking lot, roadway and utility As -Built data and other available data. Task 1.4 Caltrans Local Assistance Coordination and Form Preparation Dokken, on behalf of the City, will coordinate directly with Caltrans to prepare the construction Request for Authorization (RFA) and secure the E-76. Dokken will also prepare all required forms to include the utility and right of way certification, PS&E checklist and support the City's environmental consultant for the preparation of the NEPA Revalidation that will be required to request the construction RFA. Throughout the design process, Dokken will coordinate with Caltrans to address any review comments and gain Caltrans and City approval. Task I Deliveroble(s): Up to twelve (I2) Meeting Notices, Agendas, Meeting Minutes, and Presentation Materials; City Council Presentation Materials including Project Exhibits, Monthly Progress Reports and Monthly Project Schedule Updates, Team Coordination, Existing Documentation Memorandum, Site Visit Summary, Project Design Criteria Memorandum, Caltrans RFAs, Utility and Right of Way Certification, PS&E Checklist, TASK 2 - DESIGN SURVEYING & BASE MAPPING Guida Surveying, Inc. (Guida) will support Dokken to review and use the existing survey data, topography and aerial photo. After review of the data, a survey request will be made to supplement the existing survey data. Supplemental survey will include locating any above ground evidence of underground utilities. In 21-215 �Ewropr 04 d� SUPERIOR AVENUE OVERCROSSING The City has requested to budget three (3) days for any needed supplemental field surveys. AND PARKING LOT In addition to the supplemental surveys, Guida will identify existing right of way lines between the City and Caltrans right of way, roadway centerlines, lot lines, and survey monuments from available record data. Guida will prepare a base map from available record data that will include right of way lines and centerline of both Pacific Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. Task 2 Deliverables): Copy of the updated base map files in PDF and AutoCAD; ASCII text file of the field survey point file information,- The AutoCAD files to include, DTM, topography, field survey shots including ground shots and utility appurtenances and descriptors for each point in a text file format. TASK 3 - UTILITY COORDINATION Task 3.1 Identify Existing Utilities Dokken will prepare a project limits map immediately after the Notice to Proceed and request utility information from the utility owners within the project area. Dokken will prepare draft request for mapping letters to affected utility owners on City letterhead for City review and approval prior to transmitting project base maps to utility owners. Two sets of project base maps will be provided to each utility owner as an attachment to the transmittal request for the mapping letter. A copy of the utility data obtained from utility owners will be provided to the City and the original will be filed in the project files. Information on existing utilities obtained because of the request for mapping submittal will be transferred to base maps in both plan and profile view. Dokken will prepare a utility base map to integrate the information supplied by the utility owners. Information on existing utilities obtained because of this effort will be used to identify utility conflicts. Task 3.2 Utility Coordination Dokken will update the utility base map that was prepared in the prior task and will coordinate with the utility owners to confirm locations of existing utilities shown. A total of three potholes is proposed based on the utility mapping, any potential utilities relocation needed will be identified. Dokken will coordinate with each utility company and provide each utility company a copy of our 50%, 90%, and 100% plans. During the development of our plans, we will coordinate any future utilities that will be within our project limits and coordinate these improvements into our project. Dokken will maintain on-going record keeping, meeting minutes, correspondence, schedules and status updates between the project team, the City, and each utility company. Deliverables: Request for Mapping letters; Existing Utility Plans, Utility Base map, Final Design of Relocations from Each Utility Company; Three (3) Utility Potholes TASK 4 - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Earth Mechanics, Inc. (EMI) will provide geotechnical engineering design services for the following design elements: (1) A new three -span pedestrian bridge; (2) A 210 -foot long and up to 11 feet tall retaining wall,- (3) all;(3) A 330 -foot long and up to 22 feet tall retaining wall; (4) A 150 -foot long and up to 10 feet tall retaining wall; (5) A 180 -foot long and up to 18 feet tall retaining wall; (6) A 230 -foot long and up to 10 feet tall cut slope retaining wall; (7) Pavement Structural Sections for the Parking Lot; and (8) Soil infiltration testing at a location. Details of our proposed geotechnical services for the project are presented below. Preliminary Foundation Report EMI will prepare a Preliminary Foundation Report (PFR) to provide preliminary geotechnical recommendations to assist structural designers in the Type Selection process for the bridge. This PFR will be prepared using the available subsurface data and the format will be in accordance with the current Caltrans Guidelines. 21-216 c9crl-DOI" SUPERIOR AVENUE OVERCROSSING AND PARKING LOT Fault Rupture Preliminary Study The bridge site is near the Newport -Inglewood fault. The City of Newport Beach Seismic Safety Element (2006) confirms the above and identified the area as "Fault Disclosure Zone for real-estate disclosure purposes". We also reviewed the California Geological Survey Earthquake Fault Zones map, and the bridge site is not within the Alquist-Priolo (AP) zone. Based on our past experience on similar bridge projects, we propose a two-step process to investigate the fault rupture issue. Step -one is a limited desktop study to collect and review existing reports and maps. After our review, we will prepare a short summary memorandum of our findings. These findings will be presented to Dokken and the City to make a joint decision of whether or not fault rupture should be considered. If the joint decision is to pursuit additional fault rupture investigation, then EMI will prepare a scope and cost at that time. Geotechnical Investigation EMI's geotechnical field investigations plan is presented in Table 1. Data obtained from the borings will be used for multiple design elements. Table 1. Proposed Soil Boring Information Design Element Proposed Number of Borings Approximate Proposed Depth(feet) Pedestrian Bridge - Abutments 2 80 Pedestrian Bridge - Bents 2 100 Parking Lot Retaining Walls 4 501 40 1 25 The boreholes will be excavated using a truck -mounted or track -mounted rotary -wash drill rig. Soil cuttings will be temporarily stored onsite in SS -gallon drums, tested for contaminants, then disposed offsite. A Cone Penetration Test (CPT) sounding will be performed at one of the bent if liquefiable layers are observed in the borings. Asphalt concrete cold -patch will be used to replace asphalt that is removed by excavations, and quick - set cement will be used to replace concrete that is removed by excavations. EMI will prepare a boring location plan and this plan will be used to secure encroachment permits from City of Newport Beach. EMI field personnel will collect soil samples for laboratory testing, including bulk samples of near -surface soils and small disturbed and relatively undisturbed ring samples of deeper soils. The small disturbed and relatively undisturbed soil samples will be collected using split -spoon samplers at a vertical interval of about S feet, alternating between the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler and the Modified California Drive (MCD) sampler. Samples of subsurface soils will be logged during the field investigation, secured in their containers or collected in plastic bags, and transported to the EMI laboratory. Laboratory Testing Field logs of the boreholes will be reviewed to select representative soil samples for laboratory testing. Various laboratory tests will be performed on soil samples to determine or derive their physical and engineering characteristics. Anticipated laboratory tests include: in-situ density and moisture content, grain size, Atterberg limits, direct shear, UU triaxial, R -value, and soil corrosion tests. Laboratory tests will be conducted in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards or California Test methods. Field Soil Infiltration Testing Infiltration testing is required at one location for this project. EMI proposes the following work plan to estimate the infiltration rate of onsite soils at each site. EMI will install two temporary wells at the infiltration test location. Depth of the wells is assumed to be no more than 5 feet below existing ground. The wells will not be sampled, though the soil type will be observed for 21-217 �y�wpo,Q� X, C' 4WJOELIO� SUPERIOR AVENUE OVERCROSSING AND PARKING LOT comparison with nearby borings. Each well will be soaked overnight and infiltration testing will commence the following day. Well infiltration testing will be performed following USBR 7300-89 method. Geotechnical Engineering Analyses Results obtained from the field investigation and laboratory testing will be used to characterize subsurface soils and conditions and create idealized soil profiles for design. The following analyses will be performed for the project: • Evaluation of seismicity and estimation of Peak Ground Acceleration based on the Caltrans design criteria, and recommendation of ARS curves for bridge structural design. • Assessment of soil liquefaction potential, seismic settlement, and lateral spreading. • Foundation analysis for bridges and retaining walls. • Assessment of global slope stability. • Evaluation of soil corrosivity conditions and recommendations for mitigation measures. • Design of pavement structural section in accordance with the Caltrans method. Report Preparation EMI will prepare a Foundation Report (FR) to provide all the geotechnical design and construction recommendations for the project. The FR will include recommendations for the Bridge, retaining walls, slopes, soil infiltration rates, and pavement structural sections. EMI will address any comments resulting from the City of Newport Beach review and prepare a final Foundation Report. Task 4 Deliverable(s): Preliminary and Final Foundation Report TASK 5 - HYDOLOGY AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS A Drainage Report will be prepared to document the hydrology and hydraulic analysis based on local criteria and will provide a detailed discussion of the existing conditions, post -project drainage patterns and conditions, results of the on-site hydraulic analyses and any issues of special concern or significance. The City will provide or agree to assumed boundary conditions utilized in the hydraulic analysis for connections to existing drainage systems. A draft version of the report will be submitted to the City for one round of comments at the SO% milestone and will be finalized upon completion of the 100% PS&E milestone submittal. Deliverables: Draft and Final Drainage Report TASK b - STORM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWQMP) Dokken will prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) in accordance with the City of Newport Beach MS4 requirements and Orange County water quality guidance. The WQMP is anticipated to include the following features: • A description of the project and the major engineering features • A description of the feasible Site Design practices and justification of measures considered infeasible or not applicable to the project • A description of the feasible Law Impact Development (LID) BMPs and justification of measures considered infeasible or not applicable to the project • A description of the feasible Biotreatment and/or Treatment Control BMPs and justification of measures considered infeasible or not applicable to the project, as well as supporting calculations. • A description of the feasible Source Control Measures and justification of measures considered infeasible or not applicable to the project • A design capture volume worksheet for each drainage area • A Site Plan showing all BMPs, impervious and pervious areas, drainage improvements, and discharge points • An operation and maintenance program and identification of maintenance responsibility • Infiltration feasibility documentation It is assumed that hydromodification control is not required for this project since all downstream conveyances are engineered, hardened, and regularly maintained. I _0 21-218 °Actconn�� SUPERIOR AVENUE OVERCROSSING AND PARKING LOT A draft WQMP will be prepared and submitted to the City of Newport Beach for review with the 50% PS&E milestone submittal. Comments will be addressed, and the final document will be submitted for approval with the 100% PS&E milestone submittal. Deliverables' Draft and Final Storm Water Quality Management Plan TASK 7 - CML DESIGN Task 7.1 Rough and Precise Grading Dokken will prepare rough and precise grading plans for the project. The project grading design will be evaluated so that earthwork on the site is balanced to the maximum extent possible. Staging concepts will be developed simultaneously with the grading design to ensure constructability while also maintaining the City's existing parking needs. The precise grading design will meet ADA standards throughout the project. Task 7.2 Retaining Walls Dokken will prepare retaining wall plans for the project. The retaining wall layout will consider the ultimate widening of Pacific Coast Highway and be designed to maximize project site area. Retaining wall type selection will consider cost, constructability and comparability with the site and bridge construction. Donald MacDonald (DMD) Architects will provide design input for Architectural features for the retaining walls developed that tie the site together and consider the City's existing architectural themes. Design input will be in the form of design sketches (2) and conceptual drawings (1) for incorporation into the design documents. Task 7.3 Parking Lot Dokken will design the parking lot with a goal of maximizing the parking count and use its best efforts to get to 161 spaces. ADA path of travels and ADA compatible spaces will be located appropriately" Stormwater treatment features will be incorporated into the site layout in a way to maximize parking counts. If required, a connection to Hoag Drive will be incorporated into the Parking Lot layout. Task 7.4 Bicycle Node with Water Fountain(s) After the basic site plan has been refined and updated with final location of curbs, walkways, ramps and stairs, placemaking and hardscape patterns will be developed. Central to the plan is a node or plaza that will be located between the parking lot and the bridge. This area will function like a hub, guiding and directing pedestrians and cyclists to and from parking, the bridge, as well as ramp and stairs connecting to the streets below. Additionally, this area serves as a small gathering and overlook to the Pacific Ocean and is anticipated to include one or two water fountains. Our team recognizes will develop alternative circulation patterns and pathways to alleviate potential confusion and mayhem. Upon confirming a safe and functional routing and layout, we will explore paving options, materials, textures and colors to further reinforce the various movements and gathering areas within this highly visible promontory. Following the schematic study, ADL will refine the design and present sketches and exhibits to finalize the Plaza prior to construction document preparation. Task 7.5 Dog Park Initially, ADL will complete a pre -design process to include research of other off -leash areas to guide the design of the dog park feature. Utilizing social media such as Yelp and Google, ADL will examine and summarize public opinion regarding the numerous local dog parks to confirm current likes and dislikes, preferred features such as shade, seating, topography, play surface and others. This information, coupled with our prior dog park experience, will be used to aid ADL in developing preferential features, proper proportioned dedication of area to large vs small dog areas and alternative layouts or configurations. Utilizing this research information, ADL will prepare a preliminary dog park plan that identifies the separate dog areas, containment fencing location, possible lighting, access, entry vestibules and other suggested amenities, along with sketches, plan enlargements, photographs or catalog information to offer visualization of all proposed features for City review. � 1 14:19.y' C"LfFOOTl ' SUPERIOR AVENUE OVERCROSSING AND PARKING LOT Upon City approval of the design development package, all components will be prepped for drafting and inclusion within the construction document set. Task 7.6 50% Civil Plans and Estimate Dokken will prepare the 50% Civil submittal to include the following sheets: • Title Sheet (1) 0 Drainage/Plans/Profiles Details (8) • General Notes, Legend Key, Map (1) Construction Details (5) • Survey Control (1) • Utilities and Lighting Plans (4) • Typical Sections (2) 9 Water Pollution Control Plans (4) • Site and Paving Plan and Details (6) • Signing and Striping (4) • Dog Park Plans and Details (2) 0 Retaining Wall Plans and Details (6) • Precise Grading Plan (4) Total = 50 Sheets Dokken shall compile and prepare the Cost Estimate based on all biddable construction items identified throughout the design package and consistent with the City's "Boiler Plate". The estimated quantities shall include, but not be limited to, itemizing all removals, relocations, water pollution control, any required mitigation work, earthwork, subgrade preparation, aggregate base, asphalt concrete (AC) paving, survey monument, painting of pavement legends and signs, traffic control, raised pavement markers, project signs, miscellaneous metal, piling, etc. The estimated quantities shall be arranged consistent with Caltrans' estimating procedures and shall contain all the information needed to prepare the Engineer's Estimate of costs. Contingencies shall be included at the appropriate percentage. Task 7.7 90% Civil Plans, Specifications, & Estimate Once Dokken receives comments from the City and stakeholder agencies, we will prepare and submit responses to comments to the City. All City and outside agency comments will be tabulated in a Review Comment Matrix and responses provided. Dokken will revise the plans based on comments received from the City. Quantity calculations and independently developed quantity -check calculations will be developed from the checked plans. After quantity calculations are complete, Dokken will prepare in Microsoft Excel an itemized construction cost estimate based upon checked plans and quantity calculations. Dokken will prepare Special Provisions for the project in a format consistent with the standard specifications for Public Works Construction ("Greenbook") and the 2018 Caltrans Standard Specifications and 2018 Standard Plans. Technical Specifications will be developed based on the plan set and cost estimate, completing the 90% PS&E for submittal to the City. Task 7.8 100% Civil Plans, Specifications, & Estimate Upon receipt of comments on the 90% submittal package, Dokken will schedule a review session, if required, with the City to discuss review comments and resolve any outstanding comments. Deliverables: 50%, 90%, and 100% Civil Plans (PDF, Five half-size, Two full-size and one set of signed Mylars), Specifications (PDF, Word, and five bound hard copies) Estimate (PDF, Excel and five hard copies), Review Comment/Response Matrix TASK 8 - BRIDGE DESIGN Task 8.1 Project Renderings To facilitate design review, Donald MacDonald (DMD) Architects will prepare visualizations in the form of sketches (2), and renderings (2) that feature the final design details and aesthetic elements of the bridge necessary for the City's review and approvals. These visualizations will incorporate the proposed Dog Park and parking site design as proposed by the be reviewed by the City's project staff and the selected features will be chosen. Two final renderings will be prepared and presented for use by the City. Task 8.2 Bridge Advance Planning Study Dokken and DMD Architects will review the rendering of the final approved concept and prepare an Advance Planning Study (APS). The structure type concept alternative will be evaluated on relative comparison of IM 21-220 ��wPoR� 04 d� C 14". P SUPERIOR AVENUE OVERCROSSING AND PARKING LOT operational performance, construction and environmental impacts, maintenance requirements, and construction cost. As part of the review, DMD Architects will assess the visual context of the design that integrates the aesthetic and environmental values with bridge and architectural elements. The APS will include the proposed structural and foundation type, the length, spans, cross section, staging and profile of the bridge. Task 8.3 Develop Architectural Features DMD Architects will develop sketches of architectural features and elements to be integrated into the overcrossing structure. Elements may include form liners and/or color on abutments, piers-, pier overlook features; light standards; and bridge rails. Due to the visual prominence and scale of the bridge, aesthetic components and elements will significantly influence the perception of the site. Therefore, it is crucial for such features to be assessed for their appropriateness and how they may establish or influence an overall project theme. Our team will coordinate these aspects to assure a viable and cohesive project theme with complementary features. Sketches of the proposed elements will be presented to the City's project staff for consideration. Selected features will be included in the project rendering discussed above. Task 8.4 Type Selection After the horizontal and vertical alignment are set, and prior to beginning final structures design work, a structure General Plan will be developed for the proposed bridge. The type selection will be documented in a concise Type Selection Memorandum, generally following the format described in Caltrans Memos to Designers 1-29 and Attachment 3. The memo will include discussion of bridge layout, constraints, alternative types considered, foundations, clearances, utilities, seismic considerations, constructability, aesthetics and cost. The report will document the preferred structure type. A draft memo will be submitted to the City for review and comment, followed by a Final Type Selection Memo incorporating comments and an updated General Plan. Deliverables: Bridge Advance Planning Study, 2 Design Sketches of proposed aesthetic elements, 2 Project Renderings, Draft and Final Type Selection Memo, Structures General Plan Task 8.5 50% Bridge Plans and Estimate The plans developed in Type Selection will be used as a baseline to develop the 50% submittal. Prior to developing the 50% plans, Dokken will meet with the City to provide an overview of the bridge design and the architectural treatment details. Any revisions will be updated and prepared with the 50% plan submittal. Plans will be prepared in AutoCAD Civil 3D. Following selection of the structure alignment and type, and approval of the General Plan, structure plans and structural design calculations will be prepared for the preferred alternative. All plans and calculations will conform to Caltrans' requirements, including AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications with Caltrans Amendments, AASHTO LRFD Guide Specifications for Design of Pedestrian Bridges, Caltrans Highway Design Manual, Caltrans' Memos to Designers, Bridge Design Aids Manual, Bridge Design Details Manual and Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria. In close coordination with the City, Dokken will assemble the calculations, plans, bid item list and estimate of construction cost into the 50% submittal package. The 50% bridge submittal will include the following: • General Plan (1) Typical Sections (1) • General Notes (1) Superstructure Details (2) • Deck Contours (1) Architectural Details (2) • Foundation Plan (1) Railing Details (1) • Abutment Layouts (2) Miscellaneous Details (1) • Abutment Details (2) Log of Test Borings (LOTS) (2) • Bent Details (3) Total = 20 Sheets Task 8.6 90% Bridge Plans, Specifications, & Estimate Once Dokken receives comments from the City and stakeholder agencies, we will prepare and submit responses to comments to the City. All City and outside agency comments will be tabulated in a Review Comment Matrix and responses provided. 21-221 '0704T 04 �� SUPERIOR AVENUE OVERCROSSING AND PARKING LOT An independent bridge design check will be performed for the structure. Checking will include the preparation of an independent set of structural design check -calculations in conformance with Caltrans' policy. Upon completion of the independent design check, the designer and checker will compare their results and resolve any differences. Next, the structure plans will be revised as directed by the designer. Both the designer and checker will review the revised plan set and, if satisfactory, this will become the "checked plans" set. Quantity calculations and independently developed quantity -check calculations will be prepared from the checked plans. After quantity calculations are complete, Dokken will prepare in Microsoft Excel an itemized construction cost estimate based upon checked plans and quantity calculations. Dokken will prepare Special Provisions for the project in a format consistent with the 2018 Caltrans Standard Specifications and 2018 Standard Plans. Technical Specifications will be developed based on the plan set and cost estimate, completing the 90% PS&E for submittal to the City. Task 8.7 100% Bridge Plans, Specifications, & Estimate Upon receipt of comments on the 90% submittal package, Dokken will schedule a review session, if required, with the City to discuss review comments and resolve any outstanding conflicting comments. Dokken will prepare and submit responses to the City. All City and outside agency comments will be tabulated in a Review Comment Matrix and responses provided. Dokken will revise the bridge PS&E package as necessary to address all comments and submit the 100% bridge PS&E. Deliverables: Structure Concept Approval and Type Selection, sketches of proposed aesthetic elements, project renderings, 5096, 9096, and 100% Plans (PDF, Five half-size, Two full-size and one set of signed Mylors), Specifications (PDF, Word, and five bound hard copies) Estimate (PDF, Excel and five hard copies), Review Comment/Response Matrix TASK 9 - LANDSCAPE DESIGN Task 9.1 Planting and Irrigation Utilizing the Sunset Ridge Park Plans, and other successful public open space properties such as the Civic Center Park as references, ADL will prepare a plant material palette for staff review and consideration. This initial list of possible plants to be considered will be developed based upon observed local success, ease of maintenance, water requirements, Staff and Maintenance personnel preference and ability to reinforce the project theme. The current plan anticipates a significant amount of Loffelstein retaining walls, many of which are intended to be planted. ADL will work closely with the City to carefully identify only plant and irrigation materials and components to maximize plant success with this challenging feature. All plant suggestions will be supported with photos and characteristics information to aid in the evaluation and final selection prior to the preparation of the ultimate planting construction documents. Additionally, ADL will work with the City to develop and refine an irrigation component list to identify all proposed irrigation products, manufacturers and models prior to the preparation of detailed plans and water compliance calculations. Task 9.2 Hardscape Features Manual ADL will identify and present hardscape feature options to the City for their review and consideration. Elements such as site furniture, paving type and color, custom designed elements as well as plant material and irrigation components will all be considered. Upon selection and determination of the preferred elements, ADL will catalog and package the components into a Project Features Manual with pictures, sketches, model numbers, textures and colors for both a record of the design refinement process but also a guide in the preparation of the final construction documents. Task 9.3 Hardscape Features Design Early in the process, ADL will develop an overall theme for the project that will serve to guide the team through the design and refinement of the site features, orientations, access, circulation, paving patterns, view opportunities, landscape characteristics, plant selections and how all this ties to and serves as a gateway to an existing adjacent 21-222 cRLIF6RKtiA SUPERIOR AVENUE OVERCROSSING AND PARKING LOT park, as well reinforces a new dramatic pedestrian and bicycle bridge. ADL will seek to create a thread that will tie all these elements together in a creative, playful and efficient manner. Palettes or collections of site furniture including benches, seating, bollards, railings, fencing, signage and lighting will be assembled and presented to Staff for review and consideration. Materials, textures and colors will be key components to unifying the design and overall success of the project. Final consensus will be documented in a Features Manual, (Task 9.2 above). Utilizing the conceptual site plan provided by the City, ADL and Dokken will explore alternative site layouts to improve the overall design, increase parking yield, decrease construction costs and add value to the project. Additionally, our team will prepare a diagrammatic pedestrian and bicycle circulation plan to assess patterns for efficiency and safety and to minimize potential conflicts at key locations where these paths are targeted to intersect or coexist. Also, we would like to consider adding a staircase and ADA complaint pedestrian/ bike ramp closer to the intersection with Superior Avenue, allowing a more convenient connection to cross to the west side of Pacific Coast Highway. Deliverobles: Landscape and Irrigation plans, specification and estimate, Features Manual, Hardscape plans, specifications and estimate TASK 10 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION AND CALTRANS ENCROACHMENT PERMIT Dokken will request the as -built plans for the traffic signal at the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. Using the as -built plans as our existing base file, Dokken will prepare the modified design of the traffic signal that will also take into account the future widening of PCH. A Caltrans encroachment will be required to authorize the City to perform the construction improvements within the Caltrans right of way. Dokken will coordinate with Caltrans and submit an encroachment permit application with the PS&E once the 90% plans are approved by the City. Dokken will continue our coordination with Caltrans to secure the Encroachment Permit in a timely manner for the City to advertise the entire project. Deliverables: Traffic Signal Design, Encroachment Permit TASK 11 — BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT Task 11.1 Advertising/Bidding Support Dokken shall include all tasks necessary during the advertising/bidding phase of the project, including, but not limited to: a) Copies of Drawings and Contracts Documents — The City will have copies of the design drawings and Contract Specifications reproduced for advertising purposes. b) Pre-bid Meeting — Dokken shall attend the pre-bid meeting. c) Questions and Addenda During Advertising — Dokken shall answer questions regarding the Technical Provisions, the design drawings, or conflicts in the design during the bidding process and pre -construction meeting. Dokken shall assist the City, at no charge, in preparation of Addenda regarding omissions or conflicts in the design. Deliverable(s): Copies of Drawings and Contract Documents; Pre-bid Meeting, Clarification of Documents and Preparation of Addenda Task 11.2 Construction Support Dokken shall during the construction phase of the project: a) Meetings — Dokken shall attend the pre -construction meeting and informational meetings with stakeholders. b) Questions during Construction and Requests for Information (RFIs) — Dokken shall answer questions regarding the Technical Provisions, the design drawings or conflicts in the design during construction, and assist the City in issuing Change Orders (COs) regarding omissions or conflicts in the design, at no charge to the City. Dokken shall provide responses to RFIs, as requested by the City. 21-223 ��wropa� 04 d+ns �'�[IFOFKlA SUPERIOR AVENUE OVERCROSSI!NG AND PARKING LOT c) Contractor Submittals - Dokken shall review Contractor submittals, including shop drawings, as requested by the City. d) Plan Revisions - Dokken shall prepare plan revisions requested by the City, to accompany change orders, etc. e) Record Drawings - Dokken shall incorporate all redline comments prepared by the Contractor and Project Inspector on the signed design Plans. The Record Drawings shall be provided to the City and approved prior to the release of the final progress payment. Dokken shall also provide electronic Record Drawings in AutoCAD format and Specifications in Microsoft Word to the City. Deliverable(s): Meetings; Clarification of Documents and Responding to RFI; Review Contractor Submittals, Plan Revisions, Record Drawings Scope Assumptions: 1. The Conceptual Design prepared by TY LIN and approved by the City Council will be the basis of the design. 2. No fundamental design chances to the 50% design of the bridge structure and railings will be required. 3. No additional bridge design concept alternatives will be required 4. Additional formal Design Review Hearings by the City will not be required e. °�r.rroxK�P TEAM ORGANIZATION "BLUE font indicates key staff F �Y1 PART Sr' n U �: x ANDY TRAN, PE SUPERIOR AVENUE OVERCROSSING AND PARKING LOT PPOJECT MANAGEP JOHN KLEMUNES, PE, ENV SP Chris Thomas, PE, QA/QC Mark Tarrall, PE Rob Burns, PE, SE Civil Design Project Engineer Structures Project Engineer Civil Design Darwin Cruz, PE Frank Flores, PE Electrical Michael Greer, PE, TE Landscape Architecture Anthony Lawson, RLA (ADL) CaltranS Liaison Tim Osterkamp, PE Structures CharlesTornaci, PE Fortunato Enriquez, PE Survey Lisa Henstridge Spivak. PLS (GSI) Tim Fetting, PLS (GSI) Utility Coordination Jena Addenbrooke PE Architect Donald MacDonald (MA) Geotechnical Hydrology/ Hydraulic/ Water Quality Alahasvaran Thurairajah, PE. GE (EMI) Pamela Dalcin-Walling, Eric Qrovcri. PE. GE {Et 11j PE,QSD/P Ashley Orsaba-Finders, PE, QSD/P Shawn Kenney, QSD/P Subconsultants ADL Planning Associates (ADL) Earth Mechanics, Inc. (Elvil)- DBE Guida Surveying, Inc. (GSI) MacDonald Architects (MA) MIL 21-225 EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE OF BILLING RATES Dokken Engineering Page B-1 21-226 -iF�QJF'�RT �'�Lifioa��r SUPERIOR AVENUE OVERCROSSING EXHIBIT B FEE SCHEDULE - $919,890 AND PARKING LOT NAME DOKKEN ENGINEERING CATEGORY RATE (PER HOUR) John Klemunes, PE, ENV SP Project Manager $278.49 Mark Tarrall, PE Civil PE $234.52 Rob Burns, PE, SE Structures PE $199.34 Pamela Dalcin-Wallin , PE, QSD/P H drolo /H draulics/Water Quali $211.07 Michael Greer, PE, TE Electrical $184.58 Tim Osterkam , PE Caltrans Liaison $234.52 Senior Engineer $196.41 Associate Engineer 2 $152.44 Associate Engineer 1 $134.85 Assistant Engineer 2 $114.33 Assistant Engineer 1 $95.74 Senior CADD $172.96 CADD $117.26 GUIDA SURVEYING, CATEGORY INC. RATE (PER HOUR) Task Lead $175.00 2 Man Survey Crew $275.00 Survey Analyst $135.00 Project Surveyor $150.00 PLANNING CATEGORY ASSOCIATESADL RATE (PER HOUR) Principal $175.00 Landscape Lead $140.00 Designer/Planner $95.00 Assistant $75.00 NAME MACDONALD ARCHITECTS CATEGORY RATE (PER HOUR) Donald MacDonald Principal Architect $280.00 Steve Line PM/Senior Architect $244.47 Eric Birkhauser Senior Designer $122.05 Visualization & CADD Tech $116.23 Clerical $84.00 IN 21-227 04 F 0'111IFOB o" SUPERIOR AVENUE OVERCROSSING AND PARKING LOT EARTH MECHANICS, CATEGORY INC. RATE (PER HOUR) Principal Engineer $270.42 Task Lead $146.93 Project Geologist $139.12 Senior Technician $125.05 Staff Engineer $100.82 Dokken will complete the scope of work as described in Exhibit A for a not -to -exceed fee of $919,890. 21-228 EXHIBIT C INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS — PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Provision of Insurance. Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of Work, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City. Consultant agrees to provide insurance in accordance with requirements set forth here. If Consultant uses existing coverage to comply and that coverage does not meet these requirements, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage. 2. Acceptable Insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders' Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City's Risk Manager. 3. Coverage Requirements. A. Workers' Compensation Insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance, statutory limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limits of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) each accident for bodily injury by accident and each employee for bodily injury by disease in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Section 3700 of the Labor Code. Consultant shall submit to City, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, volunteers, employees and any person or entity owning or otherwise in legal control of the property upon which Consultant performs the Project and/or Services contemplated by this Agreement. B. General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance, and if necessary umbrella liability insurance, with coverage at least as broad as provided by Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, two million dollars ($2,000,000) general aggregate. The policy shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, personal and advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract (including the tort liability of another assumed in a business contract). C. Automobile Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of Consultant arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this Dokken Engineering Page C-1 21.229 Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non -owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit each accident. D. Professional Liabilitv (Errors & Omissions) Insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and two million dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the Effective Date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three years after completion of the Services required by this Agreement. 4. Other Insurance Requirements. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: A. Waiver of Subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this Agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, volunteers, employees and any person or entity owning or otherwise in legal control of the property upon which Consultant performs the Project and/or Services contemplated by this Agreement or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these requirements to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers from each of its subconsultants. B. Additional Insured Status. All liability policies including general liability, excess liability, pollution liability, and automobile liability, if required, but not including professional liability, shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, volunteers, employees and any person or entity owning or otherwise in legal control of the property upon which Consultant performs the Project and/or Services contemplated by this Agreement shall be included as insureds under such policies. C. Primary and Non Contributory. All liability coverage shall apply on a primary basis and shall not require contribution from any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City. D. Notice of Cancellation. All policies shall provide City with thirty (30) calendar days' notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which ten (10) calendar days' notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage. 5. Additional Agreements Between the Parties. The parties hereby agree to the following: Dokken Engineering Page C-2 21-230 A. Evidence of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers' compensation and other endorsements as specified herein for each coverage. Insurance certificates and endorsement must be approved by City's Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this Agreement. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or reduced, Consultant shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. B. City's Right to Revise Requirements. City reserves the right at any time during the term of the Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving Consultant sixty (60) calendar days' advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to Consultant, City and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant's compensation. C. Enforcement of Agreement Provisions. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder. D. Requirements not Limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. E. Self-insured Retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self- insurance will not be considered to comply with these requirements unless approved by City. Dokken Engineering Page C-3 21-231 F. City Remedies for Non -Compliance. If Consultant or any subconsultant fails to provide and maintain insurance as required herein, then City shall have the right but not the obligation, to purchase such insurance, to terminate this Agreement, or to suspend Consultant's right to proceed until proper evidence of insurance is provided. Any amounts paid by City shall, at City's sole option, be deducted from amounts payable to Consultant or reimbursed by Consultant upon demand. G. Timely Notice of Claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant's performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City. H. Consultant's Insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the Work. Dokken Engineering Page C-4 21-232 Attachment Public Comments 21-233 From: Tran. Andv To: Lindeman, Marie Subject: FW: Proposed Dog Park / Superior & PCH Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 12:48:33 PM fyi -----Original Message ----- From: Rieff, Kim <KRieff@newportbeachca.gov> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 12:14 PM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer <JMulvey@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: FW: Proposed Dog Park / Superior & PCH -----Original Message ----- From: Allison Danielson <allison25@ymail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 12:10 PM To: Dept - City Council <CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov> Cc: bstroh@landrylaw.net; Avery, Brad <bavery@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Proposed Dog Park / Superior & PCH To Whom It may Concern: I am writing as a concerned individual that resides at 230 Lille Lane, Newport Beach, CA, complex near Superior & Ticonderoga regarding the proposed Dog Park. The proposed Dog Park is right by a complex that is a No Dog complex, Villa Balboa. Unfortunately there are renters / owners at this complex that have fraudulently represented oneself either verbally or in writing to be the owner of a 'guide dog' or service dog' which is by no means the issue of the City or the proposed Dog Park, but unfortunately this proposed Dog Park will more than likely entice more dog owners to move into this complex and fraudulently represent their dog as stated above. California Penal Code 365.7 PC which covers dog fraud. It has been mentioned that there has been no complaints regarding other dog parks. That is because the other Dog Parks are NOT near any homes as this one will be in close proximity to Villa Balboa Complex and the townhomes facing the ocean off of Ticonderoga. The barking of dogs will be able to be heard at these 2 complexes. No one was notified in Villa Balboa Complex EXCEPT for the 220 Paris Building. This proposed dog park will increase dogs, human traffic and automobile traffic, the automobile traffic is already hugely congested in that area, we definitely do not need more traffic. Everyone in the Villa Balboa, Versailles Condominium Complex and the homes off of Ticonderoga, basically everyone in District 2 should be aware and notified of this proposal. I do hope that the City Council of Newport Beach considers all of the above information and makes the correct decision in not developing the Dog Park at this location. Respectfully submitted Allison Danielson 230 Lille Lane Newport Beach, CA 21-234 From: Andrea Ells To: DDe t - City Council Subject: Re: Dog Park at Sunset View Park Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 11:09:32 PM From: Andrea Ells Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 8:19 PM To: citycouncil@newportbeach.gov Subject: Dog Park at Sunset View Park Dear Council Members, I strongly oppose the proposed dog park at Sunset View Park. The idea of an off leash dog park so close to so many residences is absurd. It exposes the nearby homes/families to additional noise, fleas, noxious odors and zoonotic infections and quite possibly a hangout spot for unscrupulous characters. It does not go unnoticed that the only off leash dog park in Newport is at the Civic Center- not close to the residential area. As a life long Newport Beach resident who has lived in Cliff Haven, Balboa Island, CDM, the Peninsula and Bay shores, I am well aware of Newport Beach's own "caste system", this part of West Newport has always been disrespected. I know of some lovely parks elsewhere that would make for great dog parks, and much easier to access. However, I understand you are looking for something up this way. How about the unofficial dog park at the river jetty? It can be diverted down a small stretch of beach away from the area of the Least Tern nesting area. I implore you to look at alternatives that will not impact such a large number of homeowners. Respectfully, Andrea Ells 21-235 To: Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer, City of Newport Beach, Public Works 10/21/19 Dear Mr. Tran, I am a long time resident of Newport Beach, California. I have lived at Newport Crest for the past thirty years. I use Sunset Ridge Park on a daily basis. As you are aware the Sunset Ridge Park was originally conceived as a "passive" park for visitors to enjoy walking trails and views from the park. The baseball diamond and soccer field was added as an adjunct at the behest of the Newport Beach Parks and Recreation Department. Currently, Sunset Ridge Park is being used exactly as intended. Visitors come from surrounding communities to enjoy the views, walk the trails, walk their dogs and use the recreational facilities. Adults and youths involved in competitive sports use the park. Sunset Ridge Park and Sunset View Park are perfect just the way are now. There is absolutely no need to expand the parking lot, construct a new dog park or build a pedestrian bridge. This project will be a huge cost to the taxpayer. The Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project is a solution looking for a problem. There is no problem. The Project should be opposed for a number of reasons, some of which include the following: 1. A major reason to oppose this proposed Project is the cost. There is no need to spend five million or more dollars of taxpayer funds on this Project. It does not matter if the money is local, state or federal. It is still taxpayer funds. 2. The parking lot below Sunset View Park has 64 parking spaces and does NOT need to be enlarged or modified. The current parking lot is never full and infrequently used. The only time the lot is full is on the Fourth of July and Labor Day. When there are sporting events at Sunset Ridge Park the lot is not full. Many of the parents who have youth playing at sporting events drop their youths off and do not park in the lot. 3. There is no need to build a .3 acre dog park. Currently, there is ample opportunity for visitors at both Sunset Ridge Park and Sunset View Park to walk their dogs. Any visitor to Sunset Ridge Park and Sunset View Park will see a number of visitors walking their dog(s) and enjoying the park. Visitors do not typically drive to a park to walk their dog. They walk from surrounding neighborhoods with their dog to the park. 4. The proposed Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge is not needed. The proposed bridge is not needed because it will not significantly decrease the time to get to the park or decrease the distance to access the park from the parking lot. Visitors typically walk to Sunset Ridge Park and Sunset View Park from surrounding communities. The majority of visitors do not access Sunset Ridge Park from the parking lot. Visitors can park in the current parking lot and easily access Sunset Ridge Park via Pacific Coast Highway. 21-236 5. To address the safety concerns for visitors accessing the Sunset Ridge Park from the parking lot, it is suggested that the duration of time for the signal for crossing the intersection at Pacific Coast Highway and Superior Avenue be increased. Additionally, warning lights should be embedded in the asphalt at the intersection. The lights then could be activated by a pedestrian. For a very modest cost, this would greatly improve pedestrian safety and visibility. 6. According to the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot plan, there will need to be extensive grading and earthwork which will contribute to air pollution. The elevated area at the base of Sunset View Park will be leveled. In the process of the building and completion of the dog park, native flora and vegetation will be destroyed. The existing slope that is used by many visitors to relax, view sunsets and take pictures will be destroyed. The local wildlife including squirrels, jack rabbits, cotton tail rabbits, coyotes, etc will be displaced. Protected species including the coastal California gnatcatcher and burrowing owl may be affected by the Project. The negative environmental impact resulting from this project would be irreparable. The result could include possible loss of animal life and disruption of the adjacent ecosystem. The project will significantly alter the local habitat. The addition of a dog park near Sunset View Park will increase noise pollution, light pollution, and possibly increase the spread of disease from dog feces. In summary, the City of Newport Beach should not approve a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) or approve a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot. The project is costly and unnecessary. The California Costal Commission should not approve a Coastal Development Permit Amendment for this project. Please notify me by US mail of any future public meeting regarding the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project. Sincerely yours, Barry Macpherson 15 Mojo Court Newport Beach Ca 92663 21-237 From: Betty Stroh To: Dept - City Council Subject: Dog Park/Sunset View Park Date: Monday, October 14, 2019 4:32:56 PM To whom it may concern: In October 1999 I purchased a condo at 230 Lille Lane. The main reasons I bought in that complex were: 1. It's a "no dog" property, and 2. My building abuts a scenic walkway/bluff where I frequently walk. Many of my neighbors also live there for the same reasons. Though my unit does not face the bluff, I constantly hear barking dogs that are being walked there. Further, on my frequent walks, many of the dogs I encounter are not leashes ( in spite of a leash law). They have jumped up on me and sniff around. I am scared of dogs, having been bitten as a child. Also, very often the dog -walkers do not pick up after their animals! I do not appreciate having to dodge feces on the walkway or the grassy areas. Please note my opposition to a dog park in my vicinity. I am having surgery at 8 am Tuesday, October 15 or I would definitely be at that meeting to have my opinions heard. Please feel free to contact me regarding any questions you may have. Sincerely, Betty Stroh Attorney at Law Law Offices of Betty Stroh 3419 Via Lido #490 Newport Beach, CA 92663 (949) 478-5955 BellyStrohLaw&gmaiL comcom 21-238 From: CJ Gehlke To: Dept - City Council Cc: "Mark Wilser" Subject: Air Show and PCH/Superior Date: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 4:10:27 PM PS.. Just an additional thought.. the Air Show was this weekend.. that corner is used by residents to maximize the incredible view opportunity with the elevation being so high there.. this weekend, the fourth of July.. and most every weekend.. along with every time there is a beautiful sunset. People can easily park in the lot of Superior, and they bring chairs, towels.. soft drinks and food.. The residents are telling us what they want there.. Consider: a police substation as that corner and surrounding area is in need of a police presence both for traffic and thefts.. an extended grassy area with picnic tables and places to sit and enjoy the view with friends and a gathering that is too big for a small park bench further down the walkway. That area has the most magnificent view due to its elevation ... far better than any place in the park across the street. Dogs in a dog park do not appreciate the view... Please consider making this area view and safety based... a police substation and a place for people to gather to enjoy the view and sunsets year round. View is far superior to the parks all lower elevation. Thank you! Hello Diane Dixon and City Council..... thank you for your work on behalf of our City. By way of introduction, I consult by profession on highest and best use issues for developers and lenders nationwide, and have done so for over 30 years. So I bring some experience to my suggestion. A request for consideration for the highest and best use for the corner of PCH and Superior with both present fatalities and accidents on that corner and the future Banning Ranch project is: Police Sub -station. There is no police presence on this side of Newport. The quick response to the accidents and thefts here would be such a great thing for the community. A sub station was previously proposed as part of the community center idea. At that time, the voices from the neighborhood were loudly hoping that if anything proposed were resisted, the corner might be left alone. That corner is too expensive and high value dirt to leave alone. It will be developed. So to suggest what might service the community best with the dangerous corner in mind would be a far better response than simple and repeated opposition. It is my understanding that the Police Dept could be approached again, as they were involved previously on the prior plan to incorporate a substation there, asking for support for a substation. Less traffic, less pedestrians, presence both at the ready when needed and a visual deterrent to the problems currently occurring on that corner. Not one day goes by that on my twice daily walk I am nearly run down by a car blowing through a red and cars speeding through nearly hitting pedestrians. A cash infusion could be the result of the ticket potential from both unleashed dogs in both adjacent parks and the constant traffic infractions on that corner. Please redirect attention to a police substation as an alternate concept which would be highly useful, life saving and provide much needed support for the upcoming development next to the Ridge Park as well. Thanks for letting me help you today! C1 Gehlke, CEO/Founder licensed since 1979 DRE No. 00803243 REO Nationwide, Inc. Beneficial RE Inc. 21-239 DRE No. 01334671 www.reonationwide.com Office: Newport Beach, CA 92663 Mail: 1927 Harbor Blvd. Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 ciPreon ation wide. com phone: 888.700.0868 x 326 fax: 888.700.0868 Linkedln: www.linkedin.com/aub/carol-iean-%22ci%11-aeh/ke/a/915/714 REO Disposition Outsource Services BPO and APPRAISAL Services - Individual or Volume Bulk BULK Sale Facilitation Your Outsource company for life. My team and 1 are committed to providing you with extraordinary personalized service 100% of the time. Our mission is to build a solid, life-long relationship with you. The goal is to meet and exceed your expectations for the lifetime of our relationship. We want you to be so happy with our services that you feel compelled to refer people you respect to us. The greatest compliment we can receive is a referral from you. u 21-240 From: Doug Tamkin <dtamkin @artivation.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 10:07 AM To: Tran, Andy Subject: Dog Park Initial Study Comments Attachments: BH Dog Park.JPG Dear Mr. Tran, The Draft Initial Study for the proposed dog park at lower Sunset View Park admits that it obtained its dog park noise data from the study that Beverly Hills did for their dog park. This "Draft Initial Study - Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Beverly Hills Dog Park Project" reveals that its author, Rincon Consultants, Inc., took its noise measurements at a "comparable off -leash dog park in Santa Barbara, California." So we have Newport Beach borrowing its assumptions from Beverly Hills, which based its assumptions on a dog park (at Tucker's Grove Park) in Santa Barbara. The six nearest residences to that Santa Barbara dog park range in distance from 150 feet to 300 feet, but are single-family homes that are shielded by abundant mature tree growth between them and the park. Of most concern, however, is that Newport Beach's assumptions are in essence only theoretical projections of how the noise from barking dogs is predicted to combine with ambient noise levels. A real-world noise study has yet to be conducted by NB that takes into account the actual perceptual impact the noise from the dog park will have on the residents adjacent to this unique location. Most of the data and conclusions compiled by all of these reports, including that of Newport Beach, appear to focus primarily on the impact of construction -related noise during a project's development, but then become more speculative with respect to the project's actual use. They fail to acknowledge the annoyance of, for example, barking dogs on a Sunday morning. Furthermore, ambient background noise levels are not constant, and frequently diminish enough for transient sounds, i.e. barking, to become prominent. The Beverly Hills dog park is surrounded almost completely by buildings that are commercial in nature, including an auto dealership, a city vehicle and facility maintenance center, an animal shelter/hospital and other businesses. The nearest residences are no closer than 650 feet from the dog park. All of this is on level ground, and the commercial buildings create a sound -blocking shield around the dog park that protects the residences from line -of -sight sound transmission. The only line -of -sight path is northward along Foothill Rd., but the very few homes at the end of that path are in excess of 700 feet away and are across heavily -traveled Santa Monica Blvd. This situation is hardly analogous the proposed location at lower Sunset View Park. The uphill location of the facing residences at Villa Balboa presents numerous unimpeded, line -of -sight opportunities for nuisance noise to be experienced by a large number of people. It will not be fair to these residents if their peace and quiet is ultimately compromised by assumptions drawn from a borrowed report on a very dissimilar set of specifics. At the very least, Newport Beach needs to devise their own testing methodology that attempts to replicate the actual conditions of the proposed site. (Attached is an image from Google Maps depicting the above-described line -of -sight sound path at Beverly Hills Dog Park.) Respectfully, Douglas Tamkin Villa Balboa 21-241 OFA BH Dog Park.JPG IL V, AA ti _ _ J Ar �tR W. Jkl6ft Pr 14 44 OL —dl 00 7 ... 4:1 VR6," T n_ Measure distance Click o n the map to add to your path Total distance: 755-13 ft (2,30-16 m) — --------- From: Jori Slatin To: DDe t - City Council; Dixon. Diane; Avery. Brad; Duffield. Duffy; Muldoon, Kevin; Herdman, Jeff; O"Neill, William; Brenner. Jov; ssvdogparkCabgmail.com; Ryan Darby Subject: Proposed Dog Park on Superior Avenue Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 10:30:36 AM Attachments: pdfshare.pdf Dear Mayor, Council Members and Ryan Darby from Action Life Property Management, I AM OPPOSED TO THE DOG PARK PROPOSED FOR SUPERIOR AVENUE, right in our "backyards." Attached below is a letter detailing why the proposed dog park is a really poor choice for this location. If you have any questions or concerns, kindly contact me. Respectfully submitted, Jori Slatin Jori Slatin Jori Slatin Realty and Investments Designated Broker Cell: 602 321 0068 Fax: 866 910 2429 Celebrating 45 Years of Serving YOU! CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message 21-243 Jori Slatin 270 Cagney Lane, #205 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Cell: (602) 321-0068 Fax: (866) 910-2429 Email: iorislatinagmail.com October 15, 2019 Ms. Diane Dixon, Newport Beach Mayor Mr. Brad Avery, City Council Member Mr. Duffy Duffield, City Council Member Mr. Kevin Muldoon, City Council Member Mr. Jeff Hardman, City Council Member Ms. Joy Brenner, City Council Member Mr. Will O'Neill, City Council Member Via email: citvcouncil(@newgrtbeachca.aov CC: Villa Balboa Home Owner's Association C/O Ryan Darby RDarby@actionlife.com Re: Proposed Dog Park on Superior Avenue I have been made aware of a proposed dog park which is included in the lower sunset view park conceptual design by a group of very concerned homeowners. This dog park is just steps from our Villa Balboa homes. I am apposed to this dog park. For its entire forty year existence Villa Balboa CC&R's and rules have prohibited dogs and the HOA board has gone to considerable length to not modify any rule as this would jeopardize this grandfathered "no dogs" rules. I purchased my home with this as a major consideration. I never received any notice that the city was going to hold a meeting on August 6th, 2019. 1 have only just now heard of this proposal do to the diligence of a concerned citizens group of Villa Balboa homeowners. The first formal notification was given by mail to very few of the residents even though the value of all of our homes will be affected. This is the first I have been able to object. A good dog park environment is also a good homeless person environment. A good dog park will include shade and benches, as does the one at Newport Civic Center. There is already a homeless problem along the stretch of PCN near the proposed dog park and even in the current parking lot at the corner of Superior and PCH, as anyone who has walked there will have noticed. A dog park may encourage homeless persons to venture further up the hill from PCH. On July 11, the LA Times/Daily Pilot reported that Ruth Sanchez Kobayashi told City Council of a family member who recently found the cap of a hypodermic needle at the east Newport Beach dog park, as she discussed the city's growing homeless problem. 21-244 I love dogs_ However, the proposed dog park will add further foot traffic to and from the often utilizing sidewalk between Sunset View Park, the Hoag Hospital property and Villa Balboa. Many families walk, playing with their children and infants their safety will be put at greater risk of disease and infestations of fleas and other insects. I oppose the dog park and I ask for your no vote. The Villa Balboa is a highly desired community with its pride of ownership, fabulous ocean views, fresh breezes and quiet serenity_ Let's keep it that way. Most sincerely, Jori Slatin Villa Balboa Homeowner 21-245 From: Karen Kimball To: Dept - City Council Subject: Proposed Dog Park by Sunset View Park Date: Friday, October 11, 2019 9:14:23 AM Dear City Council, Please read our email below. We believe the best use of this land would be to make the parking lot as large as possible to support activities at Sunset Ridge Park. Thank you for considering our input in this matter! Karen and Doug Kimball Begin forwarded message: From: Karen Kimball <ddywarbux anamail.com> Subject: Proposed Dog Park Date: September 11, 2019 at 8:04:25 PM PDT To: SVVDogParkna amail.com We are homeowners in the condominium complex, Villa Balboa. We have learned that there is a proposal for a dog park adjacent to Sunset View Park. We would like to voice that we are opposed to this proposal. We were concerned when Sunset Ridge Park was completed and there was not parking provided. So we are supportive of the parking lot on the south/east corner of Superior and Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) being enlarged and a pedestrian bridge being built. However, we don't believe this parking lot would be able to support the additional activity of a dog park. We are also concerned that Superior and PCH are extremely busy streets and that any dog that might accidentally get lose could be hit by a car and/or cause a serious car accident. Please consider these reasons and do not put a dog park in this location. Thank you, Karen and Doug Kimball, 950 Cagney Lane, Newport Beach, CA 92663. 21-246 Lindeman, Marie From: Lisa Kling <lkling06@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2019 8:03 PM To: Dept - City Council Cc: ssvdogpark@gmail.com Subject: dog park I am opposed to installing a dog park on Superior Blvd. I prefer that it be installed across the street on the north side of the Sunset Ridge park. 21-247 Lindeman, Marie From: Spiro Stameso. <sstameson@road run ner.com> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2019 12:03 PM To: SSVDogPark@gmail.com Cc: Dept - City Council Subject: sunset View Dog Park The Villa Balboa residents have in their community R & R's a no dog allowed policy for over 25 years! It is very important that this policy be maintained and that no dog park be allowed to be developed next door to us. The establishment of this dog park is not in the interest of the Villa Balboa Residents and my wife and I strongly opposed it. Please don't waist tax payer money for something the residents adamantly oppose! Louise and Spiro Stameson. 210 Lille Lane Sent from my Wad 21-248 From the Desk of Mali Saatchi October 3, 2019 Newport Beach City Council 100 Civic Center Dr Newport Beach CA 926660 Re: Proposed Dog Park at Sunset View Park To Whom It May Concern: My name is Mali Saatchi and I have been a resident of Newport Beach since 2005. Since that time I have resided at the Villa Balboa condominium complex directly across to the Sunset View Park. I am a dog owner and animal [over. For decades, Sunset View Park was nothing but a strip of dirt. It was only after fruitful cooperation of the community that we were able to successfully encourage the City of Newport Beach to convert the space into a peaceful and tranquil public space for all to enjoy. Despite the larger Sunset Ridge Park being across Superior Ave, Sunset View Park is daily visited by families, Doctors, nurses and patients of HOAG Hospital, and others seeking to enjoy the tranquility of the park, fresh air and breathtaking views. Every Fourth of July hundreds of people line the park to enjoy the fireworks from near and far and spending time in this amazing space with best unobstructed views. During the Huntington Beach airshows, again hundreds use this park to enjoy the spectacular aerial shows our brave armed forces put on. My home is directly above the park, and from every room in my home I am able to see the diverse people that enjoy what the park has to offer. Every Saturday group of ex- patients from the HOAG who otherwise have no access to expansive green spaces are able to walk, by wheelchairs or getting support from a friend come to the park and safely take in the scenery and fresh air. Families frequently come with their young children because this park is safe and away from the street,. Community members use the park as part of their exercise or relaxation routines. 1 am writing this letter to the respected City Council and Mayor of Newport Beach in Opposition to the proposed dog park at Sunset View. The neighboring communities along Superior Avenue already must contend with heavy traffic and the air pollution and noise caused by this traffic. By extending the parking lot and converting portion of the Sunset View Park to a dog park, the City will be creating a public burden. The homes immediately surrounding the park are mainly condominiums, and at this very few large dogs frequent the park. There is a large Sunset Ridge hark across the Superior Avenue and every day the dog owners take advantage of the long walk with their dogs, considering a dog Page 1 of 3 21-249 From the Desk of Mali Saatchi park on the beach and another park 10 minutes away near the Orange County Fairgrounds. A dog park at Sunset View would not benefit the local community as the park itself is situated in such a way as to be inconvenient to reach, with no immediately accessible parking. Expansion of the parking lot would serve beach goers more than the proposed dog park itself. This will create increased traffic congestion on an already congested road, and also create a situation where non-residents will use the residential streets to park their vehicles. This proposed dog park also creates a health and safety hazard for the community. Superior Avenue, as it meets Pacific Coast Highway, is already traffic jammed and accident prone. Nearly weekly there are significant accidents on this two block stretch of road due to the curvature. Placement of a dog park at this juncture is a public safety hazard as dogs may dart into oncoming traffic. Animals that may not otherwise be aggressive may be startled by the constant vehicle traffic, horns, and other loud noises, creating a liability for the City and residents. It is unlikely that the City can enforce or otherwise secure the park 24/7 without creating a further burden on the City's police department. Dog parks that are so enclosed, and "off the beaten path", may become a target for crime and vandalism. Further, there is a health hazard created by a dog park in such close proximity to homes. Even at the construction of Sunset View Park, myself and my neighbors had to make repeated calls to the City of Newport Beach to have the lid of the one and only trash can installed on SSV reoriented so that the smell of the trash did not blow directly into our homes. Despite this, in the heat of the summer, the overwhelming smell of garbage is still pervasive. Even the most well-maintained dog parks have significant odor and bacterial issues. Maintaining dog parks are expensive and a cost burden to the community over the long term. The smelt and presence of urine and feces will create an environmental hazard as well as a health hazard in the hot summer months for the local community. Dog parks have limited life spans, and must be constantly maintained and renovated. By converting this already Ilmited open space to a single use dog park, only suitable for a very specific population of residents who are not underserved, the City will be removing the public access to open spaces with clean air and removing public enjoyment. Creation of this dog park will place an undue burden on the local community via increased vehicle and foot traffic, hazardous conditions, and a decline in property values in the immediate vicinity. Dog parks do not create local jobs nor do they serve a larger community purpose by functioning as an open and welcoming community space, considering there is ample space at the sunset ridge for the owners to chit chat and dogs socialise in small groups. The current Sunset View Park does function as an open and welcoming space for all in the community. I propose the space should be converted to a green and beautiful space, not only to help the incredible amount of environment and air pollution, but to beautify the Superior Avenue. Page 2 of 3 21-250 From the Desk of Mali Saatchi I thank the respected City Council for consideration of my statements as a Community member who will he directly affected by the creation of a dog park. With most sincere regards, Malakeh Saatchi 200 Paris Lane, Number 314 Newport Beach, 92663 21-251 Lindeman, Marie From: Margreta K. <galpsy00@aol.com> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 12:32 PM To: Dept - City Council Cc: mw@globalcapitalmarkets.com Subject: Dog Park Proposal near Sunset View Park Honorable City Council Members: I am a property owner of 22 years in the Seafaire section of the Villa Balboa community that faces Sunset View Park. I wish to state that I oppose the installation of a dog park near that location. Please utilize that space some way that doesn't involve traffic, obnoxious odors, and noise. Thank you for your assistance in this request.. Dr.Margreta Klassen 230 Lille Lane #212 Newport Beach, CA 92663 21-252 Lindeman, Marie From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 7:48 AM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Proposed Dog Park From: Margreta K. Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2019 11:48 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Proposed Dog Park Please know that as a long term resident of Newport Beach, living in Seafaire, Villa Balboa for over 20 years, I am opposed to the creation of a dog park near our residences, for reasons of increased pedestrian traffic and noise. Margreta Klassen, Ph.D. 21-253 From: Tran, Andy Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 7:42 AM To: 'Michael Call' Cc: 'Mark Wilser'; 'Deborah Gero' Subject: RE: What is the MND public review period? How do we make our comments know to the decision makes? Good morning everyone, The MND public review period is an opportunity for the public to comment on the environmental document that was prepared for this project. MND's include many technical studies and mitigation measures to address potential impacts. These technical studies include noise and visual impacts to name a few. Feel free to send me your written comments via email or letter. We will provide a formal response at the end of the 30 -day review period. Thanks, Andy Tran, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone:949-644-3315 From: Michael Call <onecall4alll@verizon.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 5:13 PM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Cc:'Mark Wilser'<mw@globaIcapitalmarkets.com>;'Deborah Gero' <debigero@gmail.com> Subject: What is the MND public review period? How do we make our comments know to the decision makes? Andy, What is the MND public review period? How do we make our comments know to the decision makes? Thank you, Michael Call From: Tran, Andy [ ma i Ito: ATra n 00 newportbeachca. gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 11:16 AM Subject: FW: City of Newport Beach: UPDATED - Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration 21-254 Good morning everyone, I wanted to inform everyone that our environmental document (Mitigation Negative Declaration) is currently available for public review (see below). Some of you will be receiving a notice in the mail regarding this matter. During our community meetings back in May and June of this year, I may have mentioned that City Council will consider the adoption of this document and the conceptual design on October 22, 2019. This date has been tentatively postponed to November 19, 2019. The exact date of this meeting is largely dependent on the comments that the City may during the MND public review period. Please check the project webpage (www.newportbeachca.gov/superiorbridge) regularly for up- to-date project information. Also, please share this email with your community members. Thank you, Andy Tran, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: 949-644--3315 From: NoReply@newportbeachca.gov Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 10:04 AM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: City of Newport Beach: UPDATED - Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Content Updated: This News has been previously sent out. UPDATED - Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project (PA2019-014) Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project. The Initial Study is available for a 30 -day public review period beginning September 23, 2019, and ending October 23, 2019. Post Date: 09/24/2019 9:00 am 21-255 Planning Division News Splash: UPDATED REVIEW PERIOD NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY AND INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE SUPERIOR AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE BRIDGE AND PARKING LOT PROJECT (PA2019-014) Notice is hereby given that the City of Newport Beach (Lead Agency) has completed an Initial Study and intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project, prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the CEQA Guidelines. Project Title: Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Project Applicant: City of Newport Beach Project Location: The proposed Project is located within the City of Newport Beach and is located approximately 1,000 feet from the coastline in Orange County, California. The entire Project site is within the boundary of the coastal zone as established by the California Coastal Act. Currently, an existing City -owned parking lot with 64 metered parking stalls is located at the northeast corner of this intersection. Directly east of the existing parking lot is an undeveloped piece of land with steep slopes. The Project site is surrounded by the Pacific Ocean, Sunset View Park, Sunset Ridge Park, vegetated hillsides, major roads, and residential homes. Superior Avenue runs along the western boundary and the West Coast Highway runs along the southern boundaries of the Project site, respectively. Project Description: The City proposes the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue, a new larger parking lot and a fenced dog park totaling approximately 3.4 acres in size. Due to the proximity to the coast, the area receives a significant amount of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Sunset Ridge Park, constructed in December 2014, is a 13.7 -acre active park with a baseball field and two soccer fields. Currently, visitors to Sunset Ridge Park use the existing parking lot across Superior Avenue and cross at the at -grade Superior Avenue/West Coast Highway intersection because no on-site parking is provided at Sunset Ridge Park. The new pedestrian and bicycle ramp will provide access to the parking lot and bridge from the north side of West Coast Highway. Additionally, the proposed Project would include the construction of a new sidewalk/bike path from the modified parking lot entrance to the proposed bridge. The proposed bridge would help facilitate movement of pedestrians and bicyclists across 21-256 Superior Avenue. The proposed bridge would connect Sunset Ridge Park to a new, larger asphalt parking lot with a range of 100 to 128 parking spaces. Construction of the proposed Project would also include the installation of a fenced dog park, separating large and small dogs, which may include benches and trash cans. The dog park will be 0.2 to 0.3 acres in size. The dog park would require a new water service for the water fountain and for irrigation. Security lighting at the dog park would be down -shielded to prevent light scatter. Hours at the dog park would be consistent with the Municipal Code which restricts park hours to between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. In addition, a shade structure may be installed at the dog park, approximately 10 to 15 feet in height. The top of the shade structure would be below the Sunset View Park ground elevation and would be designed to protect public coastal views. Development of the proposed project would require the following approvals from the City of Newport Beach: • Coastal Development Permit (CDP) —To allow development of the project including the parking lot, dog park, and pedestrian/bicycle bridge in the Coastal Zone. • Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) —To address reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the legislative and project specific discretionary approvals pursuant to CEQA. Development of the proposed project would require the following approval from the California Coastal Commission: • Coastal Development Permit Amendment —To amend the Sunset Ridge Park Coastal Development Permit No. 5-11-302 to allow the bridge development at the existing park. On the basis of the Initial Study, City staff has concluded that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment and has therefore recommended preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The Mitigated Negative Declaration is based on the finding that, by implementing the identified mitigation measures, the project's potential significant adverse impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level. The Initial Study is available for a 30 -day public review period beginning September 23, 2019, and ending October 23, 2019. Copies of the document are available for review in the Newport Beach Community Development Department, 100 Civic Center Drive, Bay B, Newport Beach, CA 92660 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on Friday. The document is available online: www.newportbeachca.gov/cega. Additionally, copies of the document are also available for review at the following City public libraries during regular business hours: *Newport Beach Public Library, Central Library, 1000 Avocado Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Balboa Branch, 100 East Balboa Boulevard, Newport Beach, 21-257 CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Mariners Branch, 1300 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Corona Del Mar Branch, 410 Marigold Avenue, Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 Written comments on the proposed project must be received no later than October 23, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. to the attention of Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer, at the address listed below or via email. Your comments should specifically identify what environmental impacts you believe would result from the project, why they are significant, and what changes or mitigation measures you believe should be adopted to eliminate or reduce these impacts. There is no fee to submit comments. You are also invited to attend and testify at the public hearings as to the appropriateness of this document. The Newport Beach City Council will hold a hearing on the project at a future date in the City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. An additional public hearing notice will be sent out prior to the City Council's consideration of the project. For further information as to the future schedule of hearings, please check: https://www.newportbeachca.gov/government/departments/public-works/superior-avenue- pedestrian-and-bicycle-bridge-and-parking-lot-project. For additional information, please contact Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer, at (949) 644-3315 or at atran@newportbeachca.gov. Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach, Public Works Department 100 Civic Center Drive, Bay D-2 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Please note: This is an automated message from the City of Newport Beach. Subscription preferences may be changed by accessing your News & Alerts account from the City website. Having trouble viewing this email? View on the website instead. Change your eNotification preference. Unsubscribe from all Citv of Newoort Beach eNotifications. 21-258 21-259 Lindeman, Marie From: Moji Faurtosh <faurtosh@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2019 6:11 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Dog Park at Sunset View Park My Name is Moji Faurtosh and I reisde at 210 Lille Lane, Unit 212 in Villa Balboa Community. I purchased my condo in 2009 to get ready for a quiet retirement. I strongly oppose the dog park which is very close to my unit. Please make it an extension of Sunset View Park. Thank you Very much, Moji Faurtosh 210 Lille Lane, AptApt 212 Newport Beach, CA 92663 21-260 Lindeman, Marie From: P. Matheis <pmatheis@live.com> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 10:19 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Opposition to Sunset View Dog Park Honorable Mayor & City Council: I have been a property owner continuously at the Villa Balboa Condominium complex since 1986, initially purchasing the property because of the location and how well the development was maintained. And, while I do not currently live there I serve as a member of the Board of Directors. The property itself is on a premier cliff over looking the Lido Turning Basin, West Newport and the Pacific ocean. The location is truly something special and, by Newport Beach standards, affordable. What surprised me most about this community is that many of the people whom I saw while standing line to buy my second condominium in Villa Balboa in 1988 (1 wanted a view) were serving on the Board of Directors up until last year. As well, many of the homeowners that I hear from have lived here for over twenty years. It truly is like many of the other residential community developments in Newport Beach that make this city unique, and special. It is not simply people living in a common place, it is a community. Because I have lived in, and worked in and for Newport Beach since 1975 1 have some understanding of the culture of the City. One theme that has been common throughout my experience is that the City Council virtually always voted in a manner that supported quality of life issues for the residents. Further, the protection of the natural resource that is most finite, the water features including the Upper Newport Bay, Newport Harbor and the oceanfront was and has been paramount. This started with the Robinson's successful efforts to preserve the Upper Newport Bay that was destined to be ringed with high rise hotels, the rejection of the State approved Pacific Coast Freeway through Newport Heights that would divide the city, and the down coast development of the Irvine Coast slated at one time for 85,000 residents. Other efforts that limited building heights to 35 feet around the Harbor, and the down zoning of 320 R-2 residential properties on the Balboa Peninsula further illustrate my understanding. Because the Sunset View Park has a proposed dog park at the higher elevation it will irreparably damage the a pristine view of city property over which the City Council has complete authority to control. This damage will certainly have a negative influence property values of the Villa Balboa complex, and by extension drive down property tax valuation for the City as well. Unfortunately, because Newport Center and the Airport Area are large centers of employment many of those who travel east bound on West Coast Highway from Huntington Beach will see this poor land use decision each and every work day, further damaging the reputation of the City. Remember that Villa Balboa is a no dog complex. I urge the City Council to vote NO on the dog park at the Sunset View Park hill adjacent to Villa Balboa. 21-261 Finally, as one of my volunteer duties I will be teaching at a firefighters training symposium from 18-22 November in Fresno, and unable to be at the November 19, 2019 City Council meeting regarding the proposed dog park. I hope this communique will sufficiently serve to adequately influence your vote on this important decision. Sincerely, Paul Matheis 21-262 Lindeman, Marie From: owner <pachanga@roadrunner.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 4:47 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: newport beach dog park NO NO NOH a dog park would decrease the value of our property and be an unsightly addition to the west side of newport beach many of us have ocean view properties and this dog park will assist in destroying the views as well as depending on wind direction, adding an unwanted odor to our area please !! NO dog park ! Richard and June D Hunt 280 Cagney Lane Newport Beach ca Villa Balboa Communitiy 21-263 From: Tran, Andy Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 11:19 AM To: 'Ryan Darby' Cc: Carleen Subject: RE: Ambient Noise Hi Ryan, Since this is a question on our environmental document (MND) and we are currently in our 30 -day public review period, I will have our environmental consultant prepare a formal written response to your question at the end of the review period. This is standard California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) procedure. With that said, Table 4-21 of the MND does list existing noise levels at the 3 locations. I would also suggest reviewing Appendix H. Hope this helps. Andy Tran, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone:949-644-3315 From: Ryan Darby <rdarby@action Iife.com> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 7:58 AM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Cc: Carleen <challstead@aol.com> Subject: Ambient Noise Hello Andy, I went through the Noise Report and I see where it says it is only an additive if the noise source is within 10 dB of ambient noise levels, however I don't see where it lists what the ambient noise levels are at Villa Balboa and that there weren't any tests done on the property like we do for Hoag Hospital to obtain those noise levels. Can you let me know what they found the ambient noise level to be? The point that I was trying to bring up at the meeting is that the noise levels at Villa Balboa is already significantly higher than most of the rest of Newport Beach with the Co -Gen Plant, PCH and Superior. The dog park, would be raising an already elevated ambient noise level for the residents. 21-264 ACTI � f w PROPCkTY MAXAGS rAENf 1 D Lk RYAN DARBY I COMMUNITY MANAGER ACTION PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 2603 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500, IRVINE, CA 92614 OFFICE 1 (949) 450-0202 WEBSITE I WARD I RDARBY@ACTIONLIFE.COM **CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message is intended to be viewed only by the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or you receive this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete the original message and any copies of it from your computer system.** **For further information about Action Property Management, please see our website at www.actionlife.com or refer to any of our offices. Thank you.** 21-265 Lindeman, Marie From: S S <sellanis@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2019 11:08 AM To: Dept - City Council Cc: ssvdogpark@gmail.com Subject: Sunset View Dog Park Dear City Council: I am a resident of 200 Paris Ln, Newport Beach, CA 92663 in the Villa Balboa complex. I am writing to state my opposition of the Sunset View Dog Park. I am not opposed to animals - I am opposed to the many irresponsible pet owners that I see regularly that do not clean up after their dogs or themselves. I am part will bring these people from various parts of Orange County who do not live here and who do not have a vested interested in keeping our community, safe, clean and peaceful. Most of us who live here have invested a significant part of our income into purchasing in this neighborhood when we could have found less expensive accommodations elsewhere. We felt the investment had an excellent return on investment because of the quality of life we currently enjoy. A dog part would diminish that quality of life and in my opinion erode property values. I would prefer to see an extension of Sunset View park and any aesthetic landscaping that would enhance our existing view. Thank you for your time. Sandra Sellani 200 Paris Lane #316 Newport Beach, CA 92663 949.463.8683 (c) 21-266 From: Sandy <sandyfrizzell@roadrunner.com> Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2019 3:09 PM To: Recreation Cc: Tran, Andy; Levin, Sean; SWDogPark@gmail.com Subject: Lower Sunset View Park proposal Attachments: SunsetViewPark.docx As a resident and home owner of Villa Balboa attached is my response to the proposed dog park. Please share this with all concerned especially the decision makers of our city. Thank you. Sandy Frizzell 21-267 October, 2019 To our city planners, I was unable to attend the Aug. 6 meeting regarding the plans for Lower Sunset View Park. On Sept. 11 I attended the Speak Up meeting and found out where the planned Dog Park is to be build. The mailer is deceiving. I was in disbelief! I live in Villa Balboa at 200 Paris Lane #214 on the second floor of the most NW corner of the Paris building, Superior and PCH. From my unit I can see the Sunset View Park from most rooms in my unit. Sunset View Park is my "front yard." And you want to build a dog park on one of the most prized viewing locations of West Newport Beach!!! There are many better locations for a dog park. Regarding use of Lower Sunset View Park, adding parking is good use of this property for people to better use Sunset Ridge Park. The most valuable part of Sunset View Park is the dirt mound. It is enjoyed by residence every day, all day; morning, noon and especially at Sunset. People walk, ride their bikes, put up tripods, stand and sit there to take in the beautiful views. I call it Inspiration Point. I have many photos to show you. It would be a crime to do anything other than to enhance this small space for its best use, THE VIEW. Let the people continue to enjoy the spectacular views from this prime property. Please do not obstruct the view in any way. I love dogs, but this is not the place for a dog park. We do not want the added noise, traffic and smells of a dog park. It seems to me an easy solution is to move the Dog Park to a lower area in the lower part of Sunset View Park toward PCH. I understand the city envisions a road to the Hoag parking lot. It is highly unlikely Hoag will ever allow this. It is a win-win without ruining the view for visitors and residence to put the dog park in the lower part of SVP. There should be nothing built or added to obstruct the view. I suggest enhancing the dirt mound by adding a little walk way and some sturdy grass, maybe even expanding it toward the CoGent Plant. Please do not take away Inspiration Point from the residence of Newport Beach, visitors and residents of Villa Balboa. Let us continue to enjoying our treasured views. Sandy Frizzell 200 Paris Ln #214 Newport Beach, CA 92663 949-646-3248 sandyfrizzell@roadrunner.com 21-268 Lindeman, Marie From: Sheryl Menes <smenes@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 5:57 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Dog park Dear City Council representative, I am a resident of the Villa Balboa Home Association, and recently found out that the land right next to my property is being considered for a dog park. I deeply reject this proposal! The noise, smell and traffic are only a few of my objections. There is a huge new park across the street, how much land does a dog need! We do not allow dogs in our condos, yet already I find my self hopping over dog poop that is left at the park that overlooks the HOAG air condensers - The value of our property just keeps going down. Couldn't we just enlarge the park that is already there? Or a swing set? Or just plain old nature? Please reconsider. Thank you for your time. Healthiest regards, Sheryl Sheryl Jakofsky-Menes MS., RDN. "Nothing Tastes As Good As Being Healthy Feels" 200 Paris Lane Newport Beach, California 92663 1 21-269 Lindeman, Marie From: STEVEN SCHOENLEIN <sesinnewport@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2019 11:12 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: OBJECTION TO A DOG PARK AT SUNSET VIEW PARK. Good evening NB City Council I have been a homeowner in Villa Balboa since 1999 and I am definitely opposed to a dog park next to Sunset View Park. As I live in the 200 Paris Lane building and I have a direct view of Sunset View Park and it is GORGEOUS!! The proposed area is too small of a space, too close to residences, and Villa Balboa does not allow condo owners to have dogs. It is a very quiet and tranquil location and I sure hope it stays that way. Many of us moved here because we are allergic or have asthma or other reasons for not wishing to be around dogs. There are a few service/companion dogs only at Villa Balboa. It would make more sense to locate the dog park near the planned playing fields on the far side toward Huntington Beach. There is alot of vacant land there that would be a perfect location for a dog park ..... away from residences and alot more space to design a wonderful dog park. Thank you. STEVE SCHOENLEIN 200 Paris Lane #317 Newport Beach, California 92663 (714) 403-7735 21-270 Lindeman, Marie From: Sudhir Banker <bankerfmly@aol.com> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 12:34 PM To: Dixon, Diane; Dept - City Council; Tran, Andy; Detweiler, Laura; Levin, Sean Cc: Darby Ryan #313 Hoa Subject: Re: DOG PARK/PARKING EXPANSION next to Sunset Ridge park Honarable Mayor Diane, respected city council, Mr.Tran, Ms.Detweiler and all staff Thank u very much for giving myself and all of us at Villa Balboa to giving us opportunity to meet with u all at dog park and listen and hear us about: -Our very strong objection to placement of Dog Park right in our front yard for specific reasons our request to place it totally somewhere else . - SUNSET VIEW PARK IS SUCH A UNIQUE PARK, A MOST EXPENSIVE PIECE OF REAL ESTATE ,WHERE ANNUALLY MORE THAN 25000 People from our property of 459 units, HOAG staff and patients, neighboring residents and local and out of city/state 'Visitors' to enjoy incredible Ocean views, fresh ocean breezes and unmatched Sunsets !!!! -PLEASE DONOT PLACE DOG PARK AND INSTEAD USE SAME LAND TO EXPAND SUNSET VIEW PARK. -LEAVE A LEGACY FOR GENERATIONS TO COME AND GET COMPLIMENTS TO CITY OFFICIALS AND BLESSINGS FROM ALL FOR GIVING MORE GREEN SPACE FOR PUBLIC USE. Hoping to hear from you and staff a very favorable decision . Respectfully, Sudhir Banker 8186941777 cell 200 Paris lane #313 Newport Beach Ca 92663 Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 15, 2019, at 12:33 PM, Rajeshbanker <bankerfmly@aol.com> wrote: > Honorable. Mayor Diane,respected city council members, city engineer and staff at large: > As a resident of Villa Balboa community of 449 mostly senior householders, please review our attached letter and following and consider and approve Our request: > -We are totally against the proposed Dog Park.This is immediately I 21-271 > adjacent to our building (200 Paris Lane) with 54 homes and our Villa Balboa complex of 449 homes, as well as, next to Hoag Hospital Property. > - This was thrusted and forced upon us by a stroke of a pencil on map ,immediately adjacent to our community of 449 units residents Villa Balboa (with no Dogs policy for 40 years)and practically placed into our front yard .There is no buffer zone,period. This will have perhaps unintentional but severe adverse consequences to health , quiet and peaceful enjoyment by our community, as well as, annually more than 25,000 visiting peoGmail.comple , including Hoag staff and patients in wheel chairs, enjoying daily walks, meditation, playing with children and most importantly enjoying fresh ocean breezes and fantastic sunrise and sunsets in a quiet and peaceful environment, etc... > -Sunset View park ,a tiny park, only a block away from ocean, was named and created for enjoyment by public to enjoy fresh ocean breezes ,Fantastic sunsets , fireworks,air show,boat race in a very Quiet,peaceful environment with loved ones. > Instead, adjacent proposed dog park will bring lot of unhealthy air with foul smell and lots of barking noise pollution and create a very unsafe location for dogs, people and traffic in and out and slow down or block emergency vehicle traffic on Superior to and from Hoag. > -Noise pollution of loud barking,smell,unhealthy air conditions (replacing refreshing clean ocean breezes)from my and surrounding units will be unacceptable and any "study" city puts it in question. > WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST: > - We consider you all , city fathers, as parents, using your wisdom and long range thinking To protect and enhance the interests and rights of us public for quiet, peaceful Enjoyment for generations to come. > - The land for proposed dog park is very precious and unique real estate and should be used for the benefit Of people FIRST. > - Suggest, let us create something very valuable for our many generations to come > By increasing the size of tiny Sunset View Park and provide more green space for > Meditation, excercise circuit, playing with children, mini picnics, enjoying > Refreshing clean ocean air breezes ,Fabulous sunsets ,fireworks,boat and air shows in a quiet peaceful way. > -relocate proposed dog park to a huge SUNSET RIDGE Park right across > With lot of idle land with buffer zone and near the community where HOA has dogs > Accepted policy. > -Concurrently, in addition to reallocating the land for dog park to Sunset View > Park,Reallocate land for additional parking,to expand the tiny Sunset View Park > With more green area for ever increasing and growing need for public use above. > (ARE YOU AWARE OF HOMELESS TENT WITH LOTS OF TRASH IN THE EXISTING > PARKING LOT WITH ABUSIVE USE OF BUSHES AND TREES IN ADJOINING HOAG HOSPITAL FOR DAILY SANITARY NEEDS?) > I must mention that WE LOVE DOGS, especially we spend fun time with two dogs Buboo nearby And Lolla our sons have . > THIS IS NOT APPROPRIATE LOCATION FOR DOG PARK, PLEASE. > WISH YOU WOULD HAVE PLANNED THE MEETING ON 15th October at SUNSET VIEW PARK, IN ORDER TO GET FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE OF THE ISSUES ON HAND. 21-272 > RESPECTFULLY, > Sudhir Banker > OWNER: > 200 Paris Lane #313 > Newport Beach CA 92663 > Phone: 818-694-1777 > Email: bankerfmly@aol.com > <DOG PARK > Sent from my iPad 9 21-273 Lindeman, Marie From: SURESH PARIKH <suresh_parikh@hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2019 9:41 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Fw: Proposed Dog Park on Superior Avenue This mail is re -sent as the original email was not delivered to the recipient. Sent from Windows Mail From: Suresh Parikh Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 3:53 PM To: citycouncilknewprtbeachca.gov, LDetweilerknewportbeachca.gov Cc: Ryan Darby, Suresh Parikh Date: September 27, 2019 To: Ms. Diane Dixon, Newport Beach Mayor Mr. Brad Avery, City Council Member Mr. Duffy Duffield, City Council Member Mr. Kevin Muldoon, City Council Member Mr. Jeff Hardman, City Council Member Ms. Joy Brenner, City Council Member Mr. Will O'Neill, City Council Member City of Newport Beach, CA 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Re: Proposed Dog Park on Superior Avenue Dear Ms. Dixon and City Council Members, We have just recently become aware of the proposed dog park on Superior Avenue, which will be a part of or next to Sunset View Park (SSVP). We would like to go on record for expressing our COMPLETE OPPOSITION to this proposed Dog Park. (1) We moved into Villa Balboa (VBB) in 2016 with an assurance that VBB does not allow dogs in the Community Association. This was one of our basis to move into VBB. I 21-274 (2) We enjoy the use of SSVP, for an evening walk or for a daytime visit to the greens and seating benches. (3) The proposed Dog Park is so CLOSE to SSVP, without any buffer area between. (4) We have never seen any enforcement of Leash Laws at SSVP or Sunset Ridge Park (SSRP) (5) Many dog owners HARDLY pick up after their dogs have excreted, leaving smell and stench of feces and urine. (6) There could be harmful pathogens, parasites and diseases left from the dog feces and urine in the air near by, which could adversely affect health of the residents living next door. We live JUST A FEW FEET AWAY. We certainly disapprove of this proposal. Sincerely. Suresh Parikh Usha Parikh 220 Nice Lane, # 315 Newport Beach, CA 92663 (949) 873-5656 suresh_parikh@hotmail.com ra 21-275 Lindeman, Marie From: Suzanne Utley <suzanneutley@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 10:51 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Proposed Sunset View Park - Dog Park Hello, Thank you for the opportunity to contribute to the decision making related to the proposed Dog Park, to be located at Sunset View Park. My husband, Andrew Keller, and I are condominium owners of 280 Cagney Lane, Unit 201 ( the condo ownership is actually under my name only, Suzanne Utley). We've owned the condo since 2007. However we just made Newport Beach our permanent residence 3 months ago, after my husband retired from his General Contracting Company located in Toledo, Ohio. Living here in Newport Beach and Villa Balboa is a dream come true. We treasure our serene location and the breathtaking views. First of all, let me thank the City of Newport Beach for meticulously maintaining Sunset View Park and Sunset Ridge Park. We are truly grateful. We are also thankful for our good neighbors at all the Hoag Hospital facilities nearby. While I want to remain very positive and grateful in my email I must say, WE ARE OPPOSED to locating a Dog Park below Sunset View Park. I think the idea of expanding Sunset View Park to the area below as a Green Spacebelow is tremendous. While Hoag Hospital does its very best to maintain and seclude the Hoag facilities and the large, somewhat noisy condensers, etc..... there is an industrial feel to the area below the northern tip of Sunset View Park. Expanding Sunset View Park to Open Green Space, rather than the proposed Dog Park area would soften the ambience of the entire area. Adding a Dog Park there would add another dimension of chaos to that area. I know the City intends to maintain Newport Beach in its most natural way. A Dog Park in that small area would diminish the natural treasures of the area and the natural views. Sunset Ridge Park is also a gem to be treasured. We are very thankful for the beautiful landscaping, views and meticulous maintenance. As a local resident, I am very aware of the under use of that wonderful park. And I know how difficult it is to get to, also the lack of accessible parking. The rendering of the additional parking and the PEDIBIKE BRIDGE looks like the perfect solution. 21-276 Sunset Ridge would be the best location for a Dog Park. There is so much open space there. There are so many options for location of the Dog Park, at Sunset Ridge Park. And the location would not have to impact the ambiance treasured by the residents of Newport Crest or Villa Balboa. A DOG PARK at Sunset Ridge Park would naturally draw more people to the park. Friends and families would become more aware of the park and the treasure would be enjoyed. I am looking forward to the PEDI/BIKE BRIDGE. Even though we live at Villa Balboa, Sunset Ridge Park is a long trek for my young Grand Children and we don't go there very often. The playground at Sunset Ridge Park is one of the best in the area. The playground is also underused and needs the love and attention of Newport Beach families. PLEASE, PLEASE SERIOUSLY CONSIDER LOCATING THE DOG PARK AT SUNSET RIDGE PARK. If we can assist in anyway, please do not hesitate to contact us. And if possible, would someone please acknowledge receipt of my email. Grateful Residents of Villa Balboa and the City of Newport Beach, Suzanne Utley & Andy Keller 419-346-5041 21-277 27101 :{F Pnpenf—surlr.CS ( TINNELLY �� u�rl _ a: V«lU. CA r,-,, f�, p: 9a�.588.c�°6h t� II / p ` I p F: LA V Y G It O V! noNl linnnllylzr .cnn, ORANGE COUNTY LOS ANGELES RIVERSIDE COUNTY Via U.S. Mail & Certified Mail, Return -Receipt Requested September 19, 2019 Sean Levin, Deputy Director Recreation and Senior Services Department City of Newport Beach PO Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658 RE; The Villa Balboa Community Association Objections to Proposed Sunset View Dog Park Dear Mr. Levin: Ref. 4. 7428 SAN DIEGO Our office is general counsel to The Villa Balboa Community Association ("Association"), a 449 -unit condominium community located immediately northeast of the Sunset View Park off of Superior Blvd. in Newport Beach. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA We are aware that the City of Newport Beach has proposed to construct a public dog park adjacent to Sunset View Park, directly next to the Association's community. The Association believes that this proposed dog park will have a significant and continuing negative impact on the Association, its residents, and surrounding property values. To date, the City of Newport Beach has not indicated any willingness to minimize the harmful consequences of this proposed dog park to neighboring communities. As a preliminary matter, the Association already suffers from an influx of trespassers who regularly abuse the Association's private amenities, such as parking, to access the City's public parks and beaches located near the community. Despite the Association's diligent mitigation and enforcement measures, individuals routinely take advantage of the Association's private parking to use the City's public amenities. These violations come with significant administrative costs required to deter this harmful conduct and to pi•Otect the Association's coo- unity. Adding a new public dog park next to the community will further cause irreparable harm to the Association and its residents as the indiscriminate abuse of the parking facilities will continue to mount and increase with new public amenities being added so close to the Association. In addition to the increase in trespass, the proposed dog park will constitute a nuisance to the Association and its residents as feces (including airborne fecal Matter), urine, noxious odors, and incessant dog barking will plague the residents. The Association already experiences routine lapses in pet owner obligations to clean up after their pets as they walk through the public access path of Sunset View Park. Nearly every single day, afternoon onshore winds travel from the ocean towards and up the interior of peninsula. With the development of the proposed dog park, these winds will pass 21-278 Levin September 19, 2019 Page 2 of 2 7d28/G0775 through the dog park and direct a pervasive stream of excrement and urine odors directly through the community every afternoon, almost without exception. Along with the nuisance odors, persistent barking, whistles, and loud noises will affect the Association's residents at all hours of the day. For the foregoing reasons, the Association is strongly opposed to any public dog parr located near the Association's community. The Association would like the City of Newport Beach to take into consideration these significant and legitimate issues prior to approval any public dog park located in or around Sunset View park. We welcome the opportunity to open a dialogue with the City of Newport Beach to further review and discuss these concerns. Very truly yours, TINNELLY LAW GROUP 2�s - MATTHEW PLAXTON, ESQ. iMIP:I_k CC: llo,Lr(l of I)irL,V'r'--\'illy It bl l(.)mrinnniff \ssnciaii�sn TINNELLY LAW GROUP ", f4c)lcI- f.sIporulion 271ll l i'ucrl" 'Ectl, Suilr 2=,0 Viejo, CIA 92!91 21-279 From: Wendy Kaiser <wendyhkaiser@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 4:15 AM To: Tran, Andy Cc: Wemail Subject: Dog Park and Development at Superior and PCH Hi - I am opposed to a dog park in this location. It is too small of a space, too close to residences, and Villa Balboa complex has decades of history of no dogs. Many of us moved here because we are allergic or have asthma or other reasons for not wishing to be around dogs. There are a few service/companion dogs only at Villa Balboa. It would make more sense to locate the dog park near the planned playing fields on the far side (other side of Superior) toward Huntington Beach (spaced also away from Newport Crest). It would also be better to locate parking by the existing community center on 15th Street and connect it up to the playing field area. I do not see a need to have a bridge over Superior or further development or grading of Superior at PCH at this time. Please forward my email to the pertinent committee and the city council. Thank you. Wendy Kaiser wendvhkaisernvahoo. com 270 Cagney Ln #115 Newport Beach Ca 92663 949-202-7273 Sent from my iPad Sent from my iPhone 21-280 INTEREST LIST CONTACTS Name Representing Notes Carol Gehlke "CX Villa Balboa Sent L. Detweiler a letter opposing the dog park o (Didn't provide name) Villa Balboa Doesn't want dog park, wants open space o Met with Mark, Debi and Cindy on 7/23/19. They oppose the dog park. Mark Wilser Villa Balboa Spoke at 8/6/19 PB&R meeting. o Met with Mark, Debi and Cindy on 7/23/19. They oppose the dog park. Deborah Gero Villa Balboa Also sent letter to L. Detweiler. o Met with Mark, Debi and Cindy on 7/23/19. They oppose the dog park. Spoke at 8/6/19 PB&R meeting. Suggested putting dog park at SRP warm Cindy Schuester Villa Balboa up area. o Sent L. Detweiler a letter opposing the dog park. Spoke at 8/6/19 PB&R Anette Warner Villa Balboa meeting. o Spoke at 8/6/19 PB&R meeting. Doesn't want dog park. 0.2 ac too small for dog park. Outside 300' notice area. Spoke to Michael on 9/19 and Michael Call Villa Balboa provided him with link to project webpage. o Parking will be used by beach visitors. Dog park will create another Doug Tamkin Villa Balboa destination (impact parking). "Throw us a bone and eliminate dog park." o Wants to move dog park to Hoag Access Road. Coordinated with Sean Sandy Frizzell Villa Balboa Levin. o 21-281 From: Tran, Andv To: Lindeman, Marie Subject: FW: I oppose the dog park Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 12:04:00 PM Please tally, This is the last one that I received before noon today. Thanks, Andy -----Original Message ----- From: Rieff, Kim <KRieff@newportbeachca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 9:23 AM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer <JMulvey@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: FW: I oppose the dog park -----Original Message ----- From: Semra <semrabinbil@netscape.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 9:23 AM To: Dept - City Council <CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: I oppose the dog park Dear Sirs, I oppose the dog park in front of where I live. The reasons I oppose for the dog park are : A) there will be a lot of barking day day and night B) and the smell .... I don't think it is a convenient to have a dog park in this residential area. Thank you and bests. Semra Bilgen Phillips 220 Nice Lane #213 NB Sent from my iPhone 21-282 INTEREST LIST CONTACTS Name Representing Notes Chris Garber West Newport Submitted letter supportting the project s Judy Bernstein Attended Speak Up Newport meeting, wants dog park, had a lot of suggestions on dog park design s 21-283 From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 10:52 AM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) Cc: Gallagher, Karen; Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Support of Sunset View Dog Park From: Annabelle D'Eliscu <annabelledeliscu@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 10:45 AM To: Dept - City Council<CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park To: Newport Beach City Council Subject. Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19" meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. This side of the bay is in desperate need of a dog park. It's extremely important for the well being of our animals to have a place to run freely and it will bring our community together, as many of us are pet owners who care deeply for our dogs. Thank you. Sincerely, Annabelle D'Eliscu 21-284 From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 10:30 AM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) Cc: Gallagher, Karen; Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: SUPPORT OF SUNSET VIEW DOG PARK From: allyson D'Eliscu <allysondeliscu@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 10:27 AM To: Dept - City Council <CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: SUPPORT OF SUNSET VIEW DOG PARK Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 1911 meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you. WE REALLY NEED THIS ON OUR SIDE OF THE BAY!!! Sincerely, ALLYSON D'ELISCU Allyson 949-633-8675 21-285 From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 9:04 AM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) Cc: Gallagher, Karen; Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Support of Sunset View Dog Park From: melissalyndavison@gmail.com <melissalyndavison@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 9:03 AM To: Dept - City Council <CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you Sincerely, Melissa Davison 2416 Margaret Drive Newport Beach 92663 949.500.5930 — Mobile 21-286 From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 7:33 AM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) Cc: Gallagher, Karen; Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Support of Sunset View Dog Park From: laura mcardell <laura_mcardell@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2019 5:35 PM To: Dept - City Council<CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park To: Newport Beach City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19"' meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. 1 am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you. Sincerely, Laura McArdell 2415 Holly Lane Newport Beach, CA 92663 Sent from Yahoo Mail for Whone 21-287 From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 7:33 AM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) Cc: Gallagher, Karen; Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Dog park From: Skeeter Leeper <skeeterleeper@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2019 9:29 PM To: Dept - City Council<CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Dog park Good day. I would like to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19" meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. 1 am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Signed, Skeeter Leeper 474 Westminster Ave Newport Beach, CA 92663 21-288 From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 7:32 AM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) Cc: Gallagher, Karen; Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Sunset Dog Park From: Trevor Wood <twood@chandlerscorp.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2019 5:28 PM To: Dept - City Council<CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Sunset Dog Park To: Newport Beach City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19t1' meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. 1 am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you. Sincerely, Trevor Wood (310)308-8312 21-289 Trevor Wood Vice President Cell: 310.308.8312 www.Chandlerscorr).com Twood(ci chandlerscorp,com Operations 24980 Maitri Rd., Corona, CA 92883 951.277.5915- Scales 310.560.9923- Sales 1711 Alameda Street, Wilmington CA 90744 310.784.2915- Scales 310.560-9923- Sales CONFIDENTIAL This e-mail and any attachment, is a confidential communication covered by work -product, and the Hectronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521. If you received this message in error, please notify me by replying to this email message and destroy (delete) the original. Thank you 21-290 Lindeman, Marie From: Andy Hayes <hayesandy76@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 5:30 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park To: Newport Beach City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member. I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you. Sincerely, Andy Hayes 949-500-2189 21-291 Lindeman, Marie From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 7:48 AM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Sunset View - Dog Park From: Annie Lindt Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2019 11:17 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Sunset View - Dog Park Yes please! We welcome a dog park for our pups! When the issue is presented to you on November 19 please vote to approve. It is a joy to see pups running about in a safe environment. Thank you for your support! Annie Lindt xalindt(a-)gmail.com I 21-292 Lindeman, Marie From: Barbara Barnard <barnard.barbara@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 8:59 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Members: We understand you will be considering a proposed dog park at your November 19th meeting. We wish to send our strong support for a dog park at the Sunset View Park. The west side of our city is lacking an off leash area for owners to run dogs. This seems like an ideal spot for that purpose. Thank you! Steve and Barbara Barnard (949)673-0194 Sent from my iPhone 21-293 Lindeman, Marie From: Yardley, BM (Bill) <byardley@leasedirect.com> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 9:48 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Dog Park To: Newport Beach City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements that I urge the Council to approve. Sincerely, Bill Yardley Regional Manager Cell: 949-683-7604 Email: BYardley@leasedirect.com The information transmitted via this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer 21-294 Lindeman, Marie From: The Borggreve Family <331borg@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2019 7:50 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Attachments: 699F4621-94D4-4807-8D8C-92C10691C177.pdf Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19- meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off-leash,allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements that I urge the Council to approve. Sincerely, Christa Borggreve 331 Canal Street Newport Beach, CA 92663 949.836.6362 21-295 . ar� i a 71 HOA6 HOSMAL b a ® URBAN RESOURCE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUPERIOR AVENUE PEDEHPRUN �� . ^„ww ., ...a BICYCLE BBIDOB AND PAR[DIO I.O'121- E CffY OF 1EWFORT BEACH affIcl4m x C �° Lindeman, Marie From: Brian Brennan <Brian Brennan@ motortrend.com> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2019 4:19 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park To: Newport Beach City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: 1 want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 191h meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. 1 am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that 1 urge the Council to approve. Thank you. Sincerely, Brian and Kim Brennan (714-305-8909) Newport Beach, CA 92660 21-297 Lindeman, Marie From: Nichol Cokas <nicholcokas@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2019 6:29 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: SUPPORT OF SUNSET VIEW DOG PARK Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them toplay and exercise freely. Thankyou for supporting the new dogpark aspart of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you. Sincerely, Mr. & Mrs. Brian and Nichol Cokas 714-2067415 21-298 Lindeman, Marie From: Tran, Andy Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 2:34 PM To: Lindeman, Marie Subject: FW: New Dog Park in West Newport Please tally. Thanks, Andy From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 2:08 PM To: Tran, Andy Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: New Dog Park in West Newport From: Brian Horn <bhorn@newportfg.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 1:54 PM To: Dept - City Council<CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: New Dog Park in West Newport Dear City Council Members, Thank you for taking the time to review my thoughts regarding the proposed Dog Park in West Newport. The only Dog Park in Newport Beach that I am aware of is just north of City Hall. There is a desperate need of a Dog Park in West Newport and for that matter several others. According to our Animal Control there are around 5,000 licensed dogs in Newport Beach. That is far too many for one small park by City Hall. I urge you all to vote yes on the proposed Dog Park. Thank you again for your consideration. Rian. J. BRIAN W. HORN, CLU, ChFC CHAIRMAN & CEO NEWPORT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. 13 Corporate Plaza Drive I Suite100 Newport Beach, CA 92660-7964 Mobile: 949.887.2777 Office: 949.515.1501 Fax: 949.515.1509 California License No: 0659290 E-mail: bhorn(d�newportfg.com Web: www.newportfq.com 1 21-299 This communication is intended only for the addressee and contains information that is privileged and confidential and thus is not to be distributed outside the addressees' parent company, its subsidiaries and affiliates. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for the delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify sender by reply email. Information in this message that does not relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. 21-300 Lindeman, Marie From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 2:15 PM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works); Gallagher, Karen Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Dog park From: caroline pipkin Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 2:14 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Dog park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Parklmprovement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you. Sincerely, Caroline pipkin 9498870941 Sent from my Whone 21-301 Lindeman, Marie From: Chap Clark <chapc@sapres.org> Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2019 3:55 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Dog park To: Newport Beach City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Parkimprovement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off - leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements that I urge the Council to approve. Sincerely, Chap Clark Chapc@sapres.org 949-574-2260 Chap Clark, PhD Pastor St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church Sent from my Whone 21-302 Lindeman, Marie From: Chris Santore <csantore@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 2:08 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19' meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off - leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements that I urge the Council to approve. Sincerely, Chris Santore csantore(&s!mail.com (858) 922-2567 21-303 Lindeman, Marie From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 1:06 PM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) Cc: Gallagher, Karen; Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Dog park From: Danielle Grossi Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 12:43 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Dog park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you. Sincerely, danielle Grossi 425-623-5030 Sent from my Whone 21-304 Lindeman, Marie From: dennis.biggs <dennis.biggs5l@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2019 6:30 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: West Newport Dog Park To our City Council members - I understand that you are considering building another dog park on the City owned property near Hoag Hospital. I think this is a great idea and would fully support it. I am a "dog" person and use the dog park by City Hall. It's a great spot, is safe and well maintained. I know the current situation at the Santa Ana River mouth and the "dog beach." I could not take my dog there even if it was legal. I know the neighbors hate it and who knows what kind of contaminated items float into the ocean from the River? The current dog beach is an accident waiting to happen. A new dog park run by the City would be a real good thing for the residents of West Newport and the City overall. Thanks Dennis Biggs dennis.biggs51(a)_gmail.com 21-305 Lindeman, Marie From: Diana Billings Landis <dlandis@olqa.org> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 8:23 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Newport Beach Dog Park To: Newport Beach City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off - leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements that I urge the Council to approve. Sincerely, Diana Landis Name DIANA LANDIS Email dlandis52@gmail.com Phone # 949-280-5148 327 Fullerton Ave., Newport Beach, CA 92663 _t Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA Diana Landis I Director of Children's Choirs Our Lady Queen of Angels Church 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 dlandis@olqa.org T (949) 644-0200 F (949) 644-1349 W www.olga.org J 21-306 Lindeman, Marie From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 7:47 AM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Support of Sunset View Dog Park From: Diane Daruty Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2019 9:57 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park I strongly support the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have used the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off - leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. I urge you to approve the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements. Sincerely, Diane Daruty dianedaruty(a sbcglobal.net (949) 322-7949 (cell) 21-307 Lindeman, Marie From: E.W. Klatte <ewklatte@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 9:37 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support for Dog Park Dear Council Member: We want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. We are confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. As things now stand, many people run their dogs illegally at school locations like Newport Harbor High School and Ensign. Providing an alternative location will hopefully help to control this. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements. Sincerely, Ernest and Annick Klatte 21-308 Lindeman, Marie From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 7:49 AM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Support of Sunset View Dog Park From: Carol Crane Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2019 4:02 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Mayor Dixon and Council Members: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19t" meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements that I urge the Council to approve. As a family of surfers that surfs west Newport very regularly (was there today!), we also believe that this may alleviate the dog walkers at the Jetty, thus less dog feces in our waters endless bacteria. It provides options for those who need to walk their dogs in West Newport. Save our oceans please and keep them clean of bacteria! Thank you! Sincerely, Gary and Carol Crane cranos9 kgmail.com 921 Aleppo Street NB, CA 21-309 Lindeman, Marie From: Glenn Johnson <glenn@glennjohnsonlaw.com> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 4:56 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park To: Newport Beach City Council Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19`h meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements that I urge the Council to approve. Sincerely, Name: Glenn Johnson Email: glenn@glenniohnsonlaw.com Phone # 714-322-3064. 21-310 Lindeman, Marie From: hfarris97@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2019 6:23 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements that I urge the Council to approve. Sincerely, Heather Hansberger Hfarris97(@aol.com 949-280-6618 5516 River Ave NB, CA 92663 21-311 Lindeman, Marie From: Tran, Andy Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 12:50 PM To: Lindeman, Marie Subject: FW: Sunset View Dog Park From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 12:21 PM To: Tran, Andy Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Sunset View Dog Park From: james westling <jwlongbd@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 12:21 PM To: Dept - City Council<CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Sunset View Dog Park Dear City Council Members: We were just informed that the City Council is considering approving a dog park at Sunset View Park, and wish to advise you that we are both heavily in favor of such a park. We have two Standard Poodles, and take them the dog park above City Hall on a regular basis; and would really like a dog park closer to our home in Balboa Coves. We have been advised that the City owns the land, and has the funds necessary to construct such a park; and we both feel that it would benefit those of us living in westerly Newport Beach. Please consider our support for the dog park when you cast your vote. Sincerely, Mr. & Mrs. James R. Westling 21-312 Lindeman, Marie From: Jay Swigart <jswigart@pacbell.net> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2019 1:40 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Dog Park To: Newport Beach City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you. Sincerely, Penny Swigart 21-313 Lindeman, Marie From: Jeffrey john bitetti <jjbite@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2019 4:18 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Sunset View Dog Park Dear City Council Members, As a resident of Newport Beach for 50 years, my family is IN FAVOR of the proposed Dog Park! ! ! Sincerely, The Bitetti Family Jeffrey John Bitetti Director The Lott IMPACT Trophy 714-336-9299 (Cell) ijbiteAgmail.com www.LottIMPACTTroDhv.com 21-314 Lindeman, Marie From: Jill Hunt <jillbhunt@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2019 6:20 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Dog park in west Newport To: Newport Beach City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19- meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off-leash,allowing them to play and exercise freely. This is especially true in west Newport where our yards are very small. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements that I urge the Council to approve. Sincerely, Jill Hunt 9493385406 21-315 Lindeman, Marie From: John P. Yeager <jyeager@oneil-Ilp.com> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 9:40 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park I am writing in support of the proposed Dog Park at the City's Sunset View park. My wife Evelyn and I are 38 -year residents of Newport Beach and dog owner. We currently reside in Dover Shores and have also lived recently on Lido Island. The west side of Newport Beach is in dire need of a dog park like the one at the Civic Center Park where dog owners can let their dogs off leash in an environment that is both safe for the dogs and appropriate for our human residents. I think the proposed location is appropriate. Based on the City's analyses I have reviewed, the park can be constructed and operated in a manner that will not be harmful to the adjacent residents. In addition, I believe there is already a public trail between the proposed park and residents that not only creates a buffer but also provides great access to what is already public property. Thank you for your consideration of our support. John and Evelyn Yeager John P. Yeager, Esq. O'NEIL LLP 19900 MacArthur Blvd. I Suite 1050 1 Irvine, CA 92612 Phone: (949) 798-0722 1 Fax: (949) 798-0511 iyeager@oneil-Ilp.com NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY BE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED AND MEANT ONLY FOR THE REVIEW AND USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THE TRANSMISSION. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION. ******************************************************** IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed 21-316 Lindeman, Marie From: Katie Santore <katiesantore@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2019 12:51 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: In Support of the Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements that I urge the Council to approve. Sincerely, Katie Santore katiesantore(kgmail.com (949) 697-5553 21-317 Lindeman, Marie From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 7:34 AM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Support of Sunset View Dog Park -----Original Message ----- From: Keira J Kirby <kkirby@nmusd.us> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2019 4:43 PM To: Dept - City Council <CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: As someone who both lives and works in Newport Beach, I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. I was someone who frequented the Dog Park near the Civic Center for years while my dog was alive even though I live on the west side of the city. I know first hand of the value that this type of facility offers local citizens; a dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you for your time, Keira Kirby Keira Kirby Social Science Teacher Newport Harbor High School<http://nhhs.nmusd.us/> 21-318 Lindeman, Marie From: Laird Hayes <laird@neptune.net> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2019 4:28 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Lower Sunset View Park Dog Park Dear Mayor Dixon, Mayor Pro Tem O'Neill and Council Members Avery, Brenner, Duffield, Herdman, and Muldoon; I encourage the City Council to vote in favor of the Lower Sunset View Park Improvement Project to include the 0.8 acre dog park. It will provide an excellent option for those who illegally let their dogs off leash on the Newport Beach side of the Santa Ana River jetty. City staff has worked hard to put together a second city dog park that will not adversely affect the 40-50 residents in the Paris building at Villa Balboa despite their objections and will benefit thousands of Newport Beach residents. Thank you. Sincerely, Laird Hayes, Ed.D. NFL Side Judge 125, 1995-2017 Commissioner, City of Newport Beach Parks, Beaches and Recreation Volunteer in Policing, Newport Beach PD Newport Beach CERT - KM6CAI 949-244-4545 laird(a)neptune.net PO RC1 �vttf'`�Y` 21-319 Lindeman, Marie From: Laurie Drake <lauriejanedrake@cs.com> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 8:44 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: In support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. Although the closest dog park to me is near the Civic Center, it's not large enough for my retriever to really run around in. I'm sure the smaller dogs are grateful for it. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements that I urge the Council to approve. Sincerely, Laurie Drake Lau rieJaneDrake@cs.com 2227 Vista Huerta Newport Beach, CA 92660 310-699-5582 21-320 Lindeman, Marie From: Maclay Coldren <maclay.coldren@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2019 8:59 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements that I urge the Council to approve. Sincerely, Maclay Coldren maclay.coldren(a-)s!mail.com (949)395-2383 Maclay Coldren maclay.coldrenkgmail.com (949)395-2383 21-321 Lindeman, Marie From: martha glasgow <golfglasgow@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2019 4:13 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Proposed new dog park Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I support the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. The west side of Newport Beach has no such facility and this is a perfect location for it. I think the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents. The Civic Center Dog Park seems to be very successful. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements that I urge the Council to approve. Sincerely, Martha Glasgow Name: Martha Glasgow Email: golfglasgow@yahoo.com Phone # 21-322 Lindeman, Marie From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 8:41 AM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Dog park -----Original Message ----- From: Martha Kerstner <mkerstner@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 8:30 AM To: Dept - City Council <CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Dog park Please put a dog park at sunset view park. That area is rarely used by residents but will be packed if it becomes a dog park- a good thing! 21-323 Lindeman, Marie From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 7:54 AM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: I Support the Proposed Dog Park From: Martha Kinney Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2019 9:24 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: I Support the Proposed Dog Park To: Newport Beach City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Members, I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19' meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements that I urge the Council to approve. Sincerely, 21-324 Name: Martha Kinney Email: mhkinneyA2mail.com Phone #: 954-290-1963 Martha Kinney 21-325 Lindeman, Marie From: Mary <mepetropo@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 8:40 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Dog Park in West Newport There is much discussion surrounding the Dog Park in West Newport. We are unable to attend the meeting on Tuesday, however, we would like to express our support for the location. We are dog owners. There are a number of 'scare -mongers" going door-to-door in Villa Balboa, opposing the park saying it will negatively impact home values, and we anticipate they will be out in force at the Tuesday meeting. We do not agree with their assumptions. There are approximately 74+ KNOWN dogs in our community. Nearby Newport Crest has many more. Most of these dogs walk along Sunset View park, 2-3x daily, directly in front of Villa Balboa homes. There are issues such as barking, poop, etc., all along the pathway. It would be so nice to have a dog park nearby which might help alleviate some of these issues. Its an excellent location and far enough away from the closest VB building to have little or no impact. We are supposedly a "No dogs allowed community". The demographics of our area are changing, and more and more families are choosing to have a pet. We appreciate your willingness to hear all sides of the issue, and encourage you to move ahead with the dog park at this location. Mary Petropoulos Karen Paul Villa Balboa Newport Beach Sent from my iPhone 21-326 Lindeman, Marie From: McDonald, Michael Paul <Michael.McDonald@marsh.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2019 8:42 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Dog park I am a resident of Newport Beach and In favor of the dog park in west Newport. Thank you! Michael McDonald VP I Business Development Marsh JPrivate Client Services 17901 Von Karman I Suite 1100 1 Irvine CA 192614 Phone 949.399.2997 1 Mobile 949.344.6430 1 Fax 949.833.3027 michael.mcdonald(ci),marsh.com I www.marshpcs.com "Protecting your lifestyle, safeguarding your legacy" In California d/b/a Marsh Risk & Insurance Services ********************************************************************** This e-mail, including any attachments that accompany it, may contain information that is confidential or privileged. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it was intended to be addressed. If you have received this e-mail and are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, distribution, copying or other use or retention of this email or information contained within it are prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately reply to the sender via e-mail and also permanently delete all copies of the original message together with any of its attachments from your computer or device. ********************************************************************** 21-327 From: Tran, Andv To: Lindeman, Marie Subject: FW: SUNSET VIEW DOG PARK Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 7:17:21 AM Good morning Marie, Please log. Thanks, Andy From: Rieff, Kim <KRieff@newportbeachca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 7:14 AM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer <JMulvey@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: FW: SUNSET VIEW DOG PARK From: MISCHELLE PERLMAN <mickyneil51(@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:01 PM To: Dept - City Council<Cit)lCouncil(@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: SUNSET VIEW DOG PARK We have lived in Newport Beach for 26 years and have owned dogs the entire time. It has always been puzzling to us that all of the nearby towns had dog parks and NEWPORT did not. Please approve the establishment of a dog park at Sunset View. We really need it. Thank you. Mischelle and Neil Perlman 21-328 Lindeman, Marie From: Molly Davin <mollydavin@icloud.com> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 9:45 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. As a new resident of Lido Isle, and the owner of a chocolate lab, we would frequent the park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely, such as those of us who reside on Lido. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Sincerely, Molly Davin 949-632-4354 Sent from my Whone 21-329 Lindeman, Marie From: Tran, Andy Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 3:07 PM To: Lindeman, Marie Subject: FW: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Please tally. Thanks, Andy From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 2:55 PM To: Tran, Andy Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Support of Sunset View Dog Park From: Weber, Nick<NichoIas.Weber@Pacific Life.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 12:46 PM To: Dept - City Council<CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19' meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you. Sincerely, Nick Weber 949-351-1330 The information in this e-mail and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged or confidential information. Delivery to other than the intended recipient shall not be deemed 21-330 to waive any privilege. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this message or attachment is strictly prohibited. If you believe that you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the e-mail and all of its attachments. 21-331 Orange Coast River Park Conservancy PO Box 12932 Newport Beach, CA 92658-5079 http://ocriverpark.org/ President Robert Wilson Vice President Nancy Gardner City of Newport Beach Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 August 1, 2019 RE: August 6, 2019 Meeting: Consideration of the Lower Sunset View Park Conceptual Design Honorable Members of the Newport Beach Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission: Orange Coast River Park Conservancy has reviewed the conceptual design for Sunset View Park and believes that the project, when completed, will provide a great asset to the City of Newport Beach and enhance the concept and plans for our goal of a greater 1000 -acre Orange Coast River Park. The pedestrian/bike bridge would provide much needed safe access over Superior Avenue between Sunset View and Sunset Ridge Parks. Increased access and parking are sorely needed in this area as well as throughout Orange Coast River Park. OCRP Conservancy also avidly supports the proposed dog park in Sunset View Park. While Treasurer the existing dog park at the Civic Center provides a place for dogs to be off leash legally Bo Glover and safely, it is a long drive for those who live on the peninsula, in West Newport and in the Heights. Secretary Robert Staples As you know, there are several sensitive areas along the peninsula beaches including the Western Snowy Plover area and the Least Tern Preserve (on the Huntington Beach side of Assistant Secretary the river but often approached from the Newport Beach side). Despite the City's efforts to Lizz Flowers enforce leash laws, both areas are impacted by dogs running off leash. The proposed dog park at Sunset View would provide a convenient, safe and easily accessible alternative for Past President these dog owners and provide protection for nearby residents and help prevent damage Dennis Baker to their property often incurred by the presence of poorly controlled off leash dogs. We also believe that the implementation of a dog park coupled with support for current Board Members enforcement efforts may relieve at least some of the impact on the beaches. Overall this Dean Abernathy concept offers a much better option than the current situation. Phillip Greer Everette Phillips Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this beneficial project. John Villa Respectfully, Advisory Board Members Ann Harmer Lena Hayashi Ed Siebel Bob Wilson Rory Paster Current Board President Kristen Petros Orange Coast River Park Conservancy Jean Watt Dedicated to uniting Cc: (via email) communities around Members of the Newport Beach City Coucil the creation of a Laura Detweiler, Recreation and Senior Services Director greater Orange Coast Andy Tran, Public Works Department River Park. 21-332 Lindeman, Marie From: Tran, Andy Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 11:31 AM To: Lindeman, Marie Subject: FW: Comment Letter from OCRP Conservancy for PBR Commission mtg on 8-6-19 re Sunset View Park Attachments: Ltr from OCRP to NB Parks Commission re Sunset View Dog Park - 08-01-19.pdf fyi From: Bob Wilson Sent: Friday, August 2, 2019 4:03 PM To: Recreation Cc: Detweiler, Laura ; Tran, Andy; Dept - City Council Subject: Comment Letter from OCRP Conservancy for PBR Commission mtg on 8-6-19 re Sunset View Park Members of the Newport Beach Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission: Please find attached our comments on the above project for consideration at your August 6, 2019 meeting. We very much support the project and the concept for the inclusion of a dog park in the approved design plan. Please contact any of our Board members if there are any questions. Thank you. 46Op MAN, Board of Directors Member I Current President Orange Coast River Park, Inc. PO Box 12932 Newport Beach, CA 92658-5079 Email: presidentCa)ocriverpark.org httD:Hocriveroark.ore UMMU0 9CRiverPark 1 21-333 Lindeman, Marie From: Park Eddy <peddy@activecaptive.com> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 3:56 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park To: Newport Beach City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: 1 want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 191h meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. 1 am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that 1 urge the Council to approve. Thank you. Sincerely, Park E. Eddy - 949-285-6417 21-334 Lindeman, Marie From: Peggy Schmidt <peg4schmidt@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2019 3:18 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: New Dog Park Hi, I would like to Implore you to vote YES on an additional off leash area in Newport Beach for our many dog friends, including ours! We can no longer take them to the beach without driving to the far end of Huntington and our local dog park near the city offices has been over run by the homeless and we don't feel safe using it. We've been told that the city cannot legally remove the homeless people from around the dog park because there is no dedicated shelter in our city for them. Homeless issue aside, there has got to be more than one option for off leash exercise for our dogs. This is your opportunity to listen to the very large dog owner contingency in Newport instead of just a small group of community members that don't own or like dogs. It's honestly embarrassing that our city treats the homeless population with more respect than the dogs who live here with their very high tax paying owners. Please, please finally do the right thing for the many dog owners that call Newport Beach home. Peggy Schmidt Sent from my iPhone 21-335 Lindeman, Marie From: Jay Swigart <jswigart@pacbell.net> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2019 1:40 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Dog Park To: Newport Beach City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you. Sincerely, Penny Swigart 21-336 Lindeman, Marie From: Peter Hurley <350pete@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 9:43 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park To: Newport Beach City Council Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park improvement project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off - leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park site improvements that I urge the Council to approve. Sincerely, Peter Hurley 350pete(a)2mail.com 9493507383 21-337 Lindeman, Marie From: Rae Cohen <raecohen@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2019 7:54 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Dog Park Council Members, Please consider this correspondence as a positive vote for the new dog park in West Newport. Dog owners are becoming more and more responsible as years pass, and this park is a step forward in recognizing those owners' needs also. Regards, Rae A. Cohen 1501 Antigua Way, Newport Beach, CA 92660 21-338 Lindeman, Marie From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Friday, November 08, 2019 8:05 AM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Support of Sunset View Dog Park From: Rex Moore Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 10:08 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Counci 1 Member; I strongly and enthusiastically support the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. I would greatly appreciate your support for the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you for your consideration and your service to our community! Respectfully, Rex Moore 21-339 Lindeman, Marie From: Stemler, Robert <Robert.Stemler@kyl.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2019 4:35 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Members: I am writing in support of the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project. We live on the west side of the Bay and believe that additional dog parks are needed on this side of the bay. The Sunset View Park is a great location for a new dog park. I believe the new dog park would be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project. I strongly encourage a yes vote in favor of this dog park. Thank you. Sincerely, Bob Stemler ........................................................................................................................... Robert J. Stemler 212 Kings Place Newport Beach, CA 92663 robert.stemler@kvl.com 1 21-340 Lindeman, Marie From: Robert Weiner <starboxinc@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 8:23 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: West Newport Dog Park Please allow a dog park to serve the needs of dog owners in West Newport. Thanks for your consideration. Robert Weiner 410 Kings Road NB 92663 Sent from my iPhone 21-341 Lindeman, Marie From: Robin Kinney <robin@G2bike.com> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 7:22 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: West side dog park Please vote yes for the above dog park. Sent from my iPhone 21-342 Lindeman, Marie From: Stephanie Munakata <stephanie.munakata@haahauto.com> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 2:56 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Bring on the Dog Park Hello, I would love to see another dog park in Newport Beach. As a resident, I would totally support this initiative and think it would be a great addition for the city and its community. Dogs parks foster health and wellness, including bringing communities together. Please vote for this dog park!!! Thank you, Stephanie Stephanie Munakata Vice President, Human Resources stephanie.munakata@haahauto.com 949-698-3798 b�! .. as y s. lln. This email contains confidential information and is intended for the recipient specified in this message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any third party, without written consent of the sender or an executed non -disclosure agreement. 21-343 Lindeman, Marie From: STEPHEN BARNARD <barnard.co@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2019 7:55 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Dog park west Newport The sunset park is a great opportunity to save a spot to replace the Santa Ana river beach playground for dogs. Sent from my Whone 21-344 Lindeman, Marie From: steve woo <swoo8989@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 7:15 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: New Newport Dog Park Please consider my request to please add the new dog park for Newport Beach. We are the best in class city and the residents deserve the best in class dog park as well. Steve Woo Sent from my iPhone, sorry for any typos 21-345 Lindeman, Marie From: Tran, Andy Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 11:30 AM To: Lindeman, Marie Subject: FW: Dog park fyi From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 11:29 AM To: Tran, Andy Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer Subject: FW: Dog park From: sue whitecotton <suewhitecotton@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 11:28 AM To: Dept - City Council<CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Dog park I am in favor of the proposed dog park Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Get Outlook for Android 21-346 Lindeman, Marie From: Billings, Tom <Tom.Billings@camoves.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2019 7:02 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you. Sincerely, Tom Billings 949-394-7640 *Wire Fraud is Real*. Before wiring any money, call the intended recipient at a number you know is valid to confirm the instructions. Additionally, please note that the sender does not have authority to bind a party to a real estate contract via written or verbal communication. 21-347 Lindeman, Marie From: Tift, Wade <Wade.Tift@am.jll.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2019 3:01 PM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park To: Newport Beach City Council Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you. Sincerely, Wade Tift / 949-636-9711 (@ i LL 7qm&t, One of the 2019 World's Most Ethical Companies@ Jones Lang LaSalle For more information about how JLL processes your personal data, please click here. This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this email without the author's prior permission. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. The information contained in this communication may be confidential and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege. If you are the intended recipient and you do not wish to receive similar electronic messages from us in the future then please respond to the sender to this effect. 21-348 From: Tran, Andv To: Lindeman, Marie Subject: FW: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 11:59:34 AM Hi Marie, Please tally. Thanks, Andy From: Rieff, Kim <KRieff@newportbeachca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 11:09 AM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: FW: Support of Sunset View Dog Park From: Rieff, Kim Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 11:08 AM To: Tauscher, Peter <PTauscher(@newportbeachca.gov> Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer <JMulveyC@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: FW: Support of Sunset View Dog Park From: David Schofield <davidcschofield(@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 11:00 AM To: Dept - City Council<CityCouncil(@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Support of Sunset View Dog Park Dear Council Member: As someone who is not a dog owner I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. 21-349 Thank you. Sincerely, David Schofield 714-271-5500 David Schofield davidcschofield& gmai 1. com 714-271-5500 21-350 From: Tran, Andv To: Lindeman, Marie Subject: FW: Dog Park at Sunset View Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 12:02:21 PM Please tally, Thanks, Andy From: Rieff, Kim <KRieff@newportbeachca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 9:52 AM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Cc: Mulvey, Jennifer <J Mulvey@ newportbeachca.gov> Subject: FW: Dog Park at Sunset View From: billy s <zbillysPgmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 9:50 AM To: Dept - City Council<CityCouncil(@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Dog Park at Sunset View Dear Council Members: I want to go on record as strongly supporting the proposed dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvement Project that will come before the City Council at your November 19th meeting. A dog park on the west side of Newport Beach is much-needed and this is a perfect location for it. I am confident that the new dog park will be used extensively and appropriately by Newport Beach residents as they have the Civic Center Dog Park. A dog park is an important amenity to those residents who do not have a place to take their dogs off -leash, allowing them to play and exercise freely. Thank you for supporting the new dog park as part of the Sunset View Park Improvements Project that I urge the Council to approve. Thank you & woof William Seitz 949.300.9132 21-351 From: Jack <yankeeljack@sbcgloba1.net> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 8:06 PM To: Tran, Andy Subject: Fwd: City of Newport Beach: Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Hi Mr Tran Would this include a bridge over PCH? Sent from my 1Phone Begin forwarded message: From: City of Newport Beach News <noreply(cr�,newportbeachca.gov> Date: September 23, 2019 at 5:27:31 PM PDT To: <yankeeljackksbcglobal.net> Subject: City of Newport Beach: Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Reply -To: <noreplyknewportbeachca.gov> Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project (PA2019-014) Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Post Date: 09/23/2019 5:00 pm News Splash Planning Division News Splash: NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY AND INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE SUPERIOR AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE BRIDGE AND PARKING LOT PROJECT (PA2019-014) 21-352 Notice is hereby given that the City of Newport Beach (Lead Agency) has completed an Initial Study and intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project, prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the CEQA Guidelines. Project Title: Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Project Applicant: City of Newport Beach Project Location: The proposed Project is located within the City of Newport Beach and is located approximately 1,000 feet from the coastline in Orange County, California. The entire Project site is within the boundary of the coastal zone as established by the California Coastal Act. Currently, an existing City -owned parking lot with 64 metered parking stalls is located at the northeast corner of this intersection. Directly east of the existing parking lot is an undeveloped piece of land with steep slopes. The Project site is surrounded by the Pacific Ocean, Sunset View Park, Sunset Ridge Park, vegetated hillsides, major roads, and residential homes. Superior Avenue runs along the western boundary and the West Coast Highway runs along the southern boundaries of the Project site, respectively. Project Description: The City proposes the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue, a new larger parking lot and a fenced dog park totaling approximately 3.4 acres in size. Due to the proximity to the coast, the area receives a significant amount of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Sunset Ridge Park, constructed in December 2014, is a 13.7 -acre active park with a baseball field and two soccer fields. Currently, visitors to Sunset Ridge Park use the existing parking lot across Superior Avenue and cross at the at -grade Superior Avenue/West Coast Highway intersection because no on-site parking is provided at Sunset Ridge Park. The new pedestrian and bicycle ramp will provide access to the parking lot and bridge from the north side of West Coast Highway. Additionally, the proposed Project would include the construction of a new sidewalkibike path from the modified parking lot entrance to the proposed bridge. The proposed bridge would help facilitate movement of pedestrians and bicyclists across Superior Avenue. The proposed bridge would connect Sunset Ridge Park to a new, larger asphalt parking lot with a range of 100 to 128 parking spaces. Construction of the proposed Project would also include the installation of a fenced dog park, separating large and small dogs, which may include benches and trash cans. The dog park will be 0.2 to 0.3 acres in size. The dog park would require a new water service for the water fountain and for irrigation. Security lighting at the dog park would be down -shielded to prevent light scatter. Hours at the dog park would be consistent with the Municipal Code which restricts park hours to between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. In addition, a shade structure may be installed at the dog park, approximately 10 to 15 feet in height. The top of the shade structure would 21-353 be below the Sunset View Park ground elevation and would be designed to protect public coastal views. Development of the proposed project would require the following approvals from the City of Newport Beach: • Coastal Development Permit (CDP) — To allow development of the project including the parking lot, dog park, and pedestrian/bicycle bridge in the Coastal Zone. • Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) — To address reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the legislative and project specific discretionary approvals pursuant to CEQA. Development of the proposed project would require the following approval from the California Coastal Commission: Coastal Development Permit Amendment — To amend the Sunset Ridge Park Coastal Development Permit No. 5-11-302 to allow the bridge development at the existing park. On the basis of the Initial Study, City staff has concluded that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment and has therefore recommended preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The Mitigated Negative Declaration is based on the finding that, by implementing the identified mitigation measures, the project's potential significant adverse impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level. The Initial Study is available for a 30 -day public review period beginning September 20, 2019, and ending October 21, 2019. Copies of the document are available for review in the Newport Beach Community Development Department, 100 Civic Center Drive, Bay B, Newport Beach, CA 92660 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on Friday. The document is available online: www.newportbeachca. og v/ceq . Additionally, copies of the document are also available for review at the following City public libraries during regular business hours: *Newport Beach Public Library, Central Library, 1000 Avocado Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Balboa Branch, 100 East Balboa Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Mariners Branch, 1300 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Corona Del Mar Branch, 410 Marigold Avenue, Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 21-354 Written comments on the proposed project must be received no later than October 21, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. to the attention of Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer, at the address listed below or via email. Your comments should specifically identify what environmental impacts you believe would result from the project, why they are significant, and what changes or mitigation measures you believe should be adopted to eliminate or reduce these impacts. There is no fee to submit comments. You are also invited to attend and testify at the public hearings as to the appropriateness of this document. The Newport Beach City Council will hold a hearing on the project at a future date in the City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. An additional public hearing notice will be sent out prior to the City Council's consideration of the project. For further information as to the future schedule of hearings, please check: https://www.newportbeachca. gov/govemment/departments/public- works/superior-avenue-pedestrian-and-bicycle-brid eg and_parking lot -project. For additional information, please contact Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer, at (949) 644-3315 or at atranknewportbeachca.gov. Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach, Public Works Department 100 Civic Center Drive, Bay D-2 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Please note: This is an automated message from the City of Newport Beach. Subscription preferences may be changed by accessing your News & Alerts account from the City website. Having trouble viewing this email? View on the website instead. Change your eNotification preference. Unsubscribe from all City of Newport Beach eNotifications. 21-355 From: Jack <yankeeljack@sbcgloba1.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 8:31 AM To: Tran, Andy Subject: Re: City of Newport Beach: Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Is there a space, engineering or financial constraint to doing bridge over PCH? Also, besides improved pedestrian safety it would be an awesome view walking/riding over the "Andy Tran" Bridge to go to beach. Jack Rose Newport Crest Homeowner Ebb Tide Homeower Sent from my Whone On Sep 24, 2019, at 7:50 AM, Tran, Andy <ATrangnewportbeachca.gov> wrote: Good morning Jack, No, this project does not include the bridge over PCH. It only includes the pedestrian/bicycle bridge over Superior Ave, a new larger parking lot and a dog park. Thanks, Andy Tran, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone:949-644-3315 From: Jack <yankeellack@sbcgloba1.net> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 8:06 PM To: Tran, Andy <ATran@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Fwd: City of Newport Beach: Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Hi Mr Tran 21-356 Would this include a bridge over PCH? Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: City of Newport Beach News <noreplyknewportbeachca. gov> Date: September 23, 2019 at 5:27:31 PM PDT To: <yankeel: a� ckksbcglobal.net> Subject: City of Newport Beach: Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Reply -To: <noreplynnewportbeachca.gov> Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project (PA2019-014) Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Post Date: 09/23/2019 5:00 pm r Nears Splash Planning Division News Splash: NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY AND INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE SUPERIOR AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE BRIDGE AND PARKING LOT PROJECT (PA2019-014) Notice is hereby given that the City of Newport Beach (Lead Agency) has completed an Initial Study and intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project, prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the CEQA Guidelines. 21-357 Project Title: Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Project Applicant: City of Newport Beach Project Location: The proposed Project is located within the City of Newport Beach and is located approximately 1,000 feet from the coastline in Orange County, California. The entire Project site is within the boundary of the coastal zone as established by the California Coastal Act. Currently, an existing City -owned parking lot with 64 metered parking stalls is located at the northeast corner of this intersection. Directly east of the existing parking lot is an undeveloped piece of land with steep slopes. The Project site is surrounded by the Pacific Ocean, Sunset View Park, Sunset Ridge Park, vegetated hillsides, major roads, and residential homes. Superior Avenue runs along the western boundary and the West Coast Highway runs along the southern boundaries of the Project site, respectively. Project Description: The City proposes the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue, a new larger parking lot and a fenced dog park totaling approximately 3.4 acres in size. Due to the proximity to the coast, the area receives a significant amount of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Sunset Ridge Park, constructed in December 2014, is a 13.7 -acre active park with a baseball field and two soccer fields. Currently, visitors to Sunset Ridge Park use the existing parking lot across Superior Avenue and cross at the at -grade Superior Avenue/West Coast Highway intersection because no on-site parking is provided at Sunset Ridge Park. The new pedestrian and bicycle ramp will provide access to the parking lot and bridge from the north side of West Coast Highway. Additionally, the proposed Project would include the construction of a new sidewalk/bike path from the modified parking lot entrance to the proposed bridge. The proposed bridge would help facilitate movement of pedestrians and bicyclists across Superior Avenue. The proposed bridge would connect Sunset Ridge Park to a new, larger asphalt parking lot with a range of 100 to 128 parking spaces. Construction of the proposed Project would also include the installation of a fenced dog park, separating large and small dogs, which may include benches and trash cans. The dog park will be 0.2 to 0.3 acres in size. The dog park would require a new water service for the water fountain and for irrigation. Security lighting at the dog park would be down -shielded to prevent light scatter. Hours at the dog park would be consistent with the Municipal Code which restricts park hours to between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. In addition, a shade structure may be installed at the dog park, approximately 10 21-358 to 15 feet in height. The top of the shade structure would be below the Sunset View Park ground elevation and would be designed to protect public coastal views. Development of the proposed project would require the following approvals from the City of Newport Beach: • Coastal Development Permit (CDP) — To allow development of the project including the parking lot, dog park, and pedestrian/bicycle bridge in the Coastal Zone. • Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) — To address reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the legislative and project specific discretionary approvals pursuant to CEQA. Development of the proposed project would require the following approval from the California Coastal Commission: • Coastal Development Permit Amendment — To amend the Sunset Ridge Park Coastal Development Permit No. 5- 11-302 to allow the bridge development at the existing park. On the basis of the Initial Study, City staff has concluded that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment and has therefore recommended preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The Mitigated Negative Declaration is based on the finding that, by implementing the identified mitigation measures, the project's potential significant adverse impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level. The Initial Study is available for a 30 -day public review period beginning September 20, 2019, and ending October 21, 2019. Copies of the document are available for review in the Newport Beach Community Development Department, 100 Civic Center Drive, Bay B, Newport Beach, CA 92660 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on Friday. The document is available online: www.newportbeachca.gov/ceqa. Additionally, copies of the document are also available for review at the following City public libraries during regular business hours: *Newport Beach Public Library, Central Library, 1000 Avocado Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Balboa Branch, 100 East Balboa 21-359 Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Mariners Branch, 1300 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 *Newport Beach Public Library, Corona Del Mar Branch, 410 Marigold Avenue, Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 Written comments on the proposed project must be received no later than October 21, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. to the attention of Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer, at the address listed below or via email. Your comments should specifically identify what environmental impacts you believe would result from the project, why they are significant, and what changes or mitigation measures you believe should be adopted to eliminate or reduce these impacts. There is no fee to submit comments. You are also invited to attend and testify at the public hearings as to the appropriateness of this document. The Newport Beach City Council will hold a hearing on the project at a future date in the City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. An additional public hearing notice will be sent out prior to the City Council's consideration of the project. For further information as to the future schedule of hearings, please check: https://www.newportbeachca. gov/government/departments/public- works/superior-avenue-pedestrian-and-bicycle-brid ee�parking_- lot -project. For additional information, please contact Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer, at (949) 644-3315 or at atran(abnewportbeachca.gov. Andy Tran, Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach, Public Works Department 100 Civic Center Drive, Bay D-2 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Please note: This is an automated message from the Cityo Newport Beach. Subscription preferences may be changed by accessing your News & Alerts account from the City website. Having trouble viewing this email? View on the website instead. 21-360 Change your eNotification preference. Unsubscribe from all Citv of Newport Beach eNotifications. 21-361 From: CJ Gehlke <cj@reonationwide.com> on behalf of Team <info@reonationwide.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 6:52 PM To: Tran, Andy Subject: PCH and Superior plans The corner's highest and best use to serve the community best with the least amount of added danger to that high traffic high death rate corner is a police substation as was previously proposed in conjunction with the community center idea last year. The north side of Newport relies on a police station on the south side of the city and with crime and accidents up in our area, a police substation established prior to the added new development destined to proceed in the future (Banning Ranch) this will greatly help to serve our community. A dog park or other "social" plan will add more traffic and pedestrian's to this already dangerous corner. Thank you. 21-362 From: CJ Gehlke <cj@reonationwide.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 6:51 PM To: Tran, Andy Cc: 'Mark Wilser'; dgero@gmaili.com; Onecall4alll@verizon.net Subject: See attached letter re: Proposed Dog Park on Superior Ave. Attachments: Scan.pdf Please note attached letter regarding the dog park. NOTE: Highest and best use for this property --Can a police substation please be considered as it was brought up as a possibility last year in conjunction with the possibility of a community center. 1. Less additional traffic on an already dangerous corner 2. Better response time for police to the entire north side of Newport 3. Police presence that will be in place when Banning Ranch starts development Thank you.. CJ Gehlke Thanks for letting me help you today! CJ Gehlke, CEO/Founder licensed since 1979 DRE No. 00803243 REO Nationwide, Inc. Beneficial RE Inc. DRE No. 01334672 www.reonationwide.com Office: Newport Beach, CA 92663 Mail: 1927 Harbor Blvd. Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 cj@reonationwide.com phone: 888.700.0868 x 326 fax: 888.700.0868 Linkedln: www.linkedin.com/pub/carol-jean-%22cj%22-gehlke/a/9l5/714 ------------------------------------------ REO Disposition Outsource Services BPO and APPRAISAL Services - Individual or Volume Bulk BULK Sale Facilitation Your Outsource company for life. My team and 1 are committed to providing you with extraordinary personalized service 100% of the time. Our mission is to build a solid, life-long relationship with you. The goal is to meet and exceed your expectations for the lifetime of our relationship. We want you to be so happy with our services that you feel compelled to refer people you respect to us. The greatest compliment we can receive is a referral from you. CJ 21-363 September 4, 2019 Ms. Diane Dixon, Newport Beach Mayor Mr. Brad Avery, City Council Member Mr. Duffy Duffield, City Council Member Mr. Kevin Muldoon, City Council Member Mr. Jeff Hardman, City Council Member Ms. Joy Brenner, City Council Member Mr. Will O'Neill, City Council Member 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Via email: cit council new rtbeachca. ov Recreation & Senior Services Director L,Detweiler� newportbeachca. gov CC: Villa Balboa Home Owner's Association CIO Ryan Darby RDarby@actionlife.com Re: Proposed Dog Park on Superior Avenue Dear Ms. Dixon and City Council Members: I have recently become aware of the proposed dog park on Superior Avenue that is included in the project to add more parking for and a bridge to Sunset Ridge Park. Important Note: The following text is an example but should be replaced or modified with your personal thoughts ... for ideas see "Talking Points for Sunset View Dog Park" I want to go on record with you and the Villa Balboa HOA in opposing the dog park. For its entire 40 -year existence the Villa Balboa community has prohibited dogs. This has been the basis for many residents to purchase homes there. The HOA Board has gone to considerable length to not modify any regulations as this would jeopardize this grandfathered "no dogs" regulation. It is hard to see the logic of putting a dog park so close to such a housing community when the city has other potential sites for a dog park. Research presented by a local resident at the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department hearing on August 6 t confirmed other dog parks in our area (10 were profiled on google earth) have a material buffer zone between the dog park and residences. In this case the proposed dog park is immediately adjacent to a building with 54 homes (200 Paris Lane) and a complex (Villa Balboa) with 400 homes as well as being next to a hospital property all connected to the proposed site by a walking path. While the existing Newport Beach Civic Center dog park is shorter in distance to the few nearest homes it also has the busy MacArthur Boulevard with four lanes and a 21-364 median with trees providing a meaningful buffer and containment of the dogs that leave the dog park. It is my understanding that Villa Balboa homeowners who have emotional support or other medically prescribed dogs and attended a Villa Balboa HOA meeting regarding the agenda item of adding a bridge did so as they look forward to walking their dog in the large Sunset Ridge Park across the street. There are a number of other very practical reasons why this is not the right place nor time for a dog park at this location. • Superior Avenue is already a dangerous road with many accidents, including cars veering onto the sidewalk and even crashing through the Villa Balboa fence, in the vicinity of this location heading up hill from Pacific Coast Highway. The additional cars, people, and dogs (some of whom will inevitably get -off leash outside the dog park) will add distractions to drivers on an already dangerous road. • Smells, sounds, and pathogens carry, and those who enjoy the Sunset View Park and live near it will suffer. • Newport Beach already fails to enforce leash laws in Sunset View Park. • The shade and benches essential to making this a usable dog park will also attract more homeless; there is already a homeless problem in the very parking lot that is being expanded. We know that neighbors near the existing Civic Center dog park, which is also near a homeless encampment, complain of finding needle caps at the dog park. For those of us who live near and use Sunset View Park, we know what a great job the City has done making that a tranquil vista for those seeking ocean, sunset, and even fireworks views. If you have been to Sunset View Park you will see that its many visitors de facto have expanded the park into an area now slated to become part of the dog park. There are many uses for this valuable land with a unique and beautiful view. And we encourage the City to consider expanding Sunset View Park or at a minimum providing further green space as part of its bridge and parking lot development. S'erely Ms. arol Jean Gehlke 200 Paris Lane Apt. 106 Newport Beach, CA. 92663 cj@reonationwide.com 949-500-9434 21-365 From: CJ Gehlke <cj@reonationwide.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 6:53 PM To: Tran, Andy Cc: 'Mark Wilser' Subject: Signage on PCH and Superior Thank you for your work on this dog park issue. I consult by profession on highest and best use issues for developers and lenders nationwide, and have done so for over 30 years. So I bring some experience to my suggestion. Again, the highest and best use for that corner with both present fatalities and accidents on that corner and the future Banning Ranch project is: Police Sub -station. There is no police presence on this side of Newport. The quick response to the accidents and thefts here would be such a great thing for the community. A sub station was previously proposed as part of the community center idea. At that time, the voices from the neighborhood were loudly hoping that if anything proposed were resisted, the corner might be left alone. That corner is too expensive and high value dirt to leave alone. It will be developed. So to suggest what might service the community best with the dangerous corner in mind would be a far better response than simple and repeated opposition. It is my understanding that the Police Dept could be approached again, as they were involved previously on the prior plan to incorporate a substation there, asking for support for a substation. Less traffic, less pedestrians, presence both at the ready when needed and a visual deterrent to the problems currently occurring on that corner. Not one day goes by that on my twice daily walk I am nearly run down by a car blowing through a red and cars speeding through nearly hitting pedestrians. A cash infusion could be the result of the ticket potential from both unleashed dogs in both adjacent parks and the constant traffic infractions on that corner. Please redirect attention to a police substation as an alternate concept which would be highly useful, life saving and provide much needed support for the upcoming development next to the Ridge Park as well. Thanks for letting me help you today! CJ Gehlke, CEO/Founder licensed since 1979 DRE No. 00803243 REO Nationwide, Inc. Beneficial RE Inc. DRE No. 01334672 www.reonationwide.com Office: Newport Beach, CA 92663 Mail: 1927 Harbor Blvd. Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 ci@reonationwide.com phone: 888.700.0868 x 326 fax: 888.700.0868 Linkedln: www.linkedin.com/pub/carol-jean-5K.22ci5K.22-gehlke/a/9l5/7l4 ------------------------------------------ REO Disposition Outsource Services BPO and APPRAISAL Services - Individual or Volume Bulk BULK Sale Facilitation 21-366 Your Outsource company for life. My team and 1 are committed to providing you with extraordinary personalized service 100% of the time. Our mission is to build a solid, life-long relationship with you. The goal is to meet and exceed your expectations for the lifetime of our relationship. We want you to be so happy with our services that you feel compelled to refer people you respect to us. The greatest compliment we can receive is a referral from you. CJ 21-367 From: Brine, Tony Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 12:19 PM To: 'dave@earsi.com' Cc: Jurjis, Seimone; Webb, Dave (Public Works); Tran, Andy Subject: RE: Clarification of Updated CEQA Guidelines Dear Mr. Tanner, I have been asked to respond to your question regarding CEQA analysis of transportation/traffic impacts with City CIP projects, or private development projects. As I'm sure you are aware, Senate Bill 743 contains Guidelines regarding assessment of projects using VMT as the measure of transportation impacts. The CEQA Guidelines that implement SB 743 were approved on December 28, 2018. July 1, 2020 is the statewide implementation date and agencies may opt -in use of new metrics prior to that date. Prior to that July date, the city will determine our most appropriate thresholds. For the Superior Bridge project, the CEQA Transportation analysis was appropriate because there is no trip generation associated with the project. For the Newport Village Mixed Use development project, there will be a traditional traffic level of service (LOS) analysis and a CEQA vehicle miles travelled (VMT) analysis. The traffic analysis "Traffic Study' will use LOS as the impact threshold and will be prepared per the city's Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) guidelines. The CEQA analysis will be prepared using the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines. The use of both LOS and VMT will be model for traffic and transportation analysis for CEQA documents. I hope this helps answer your questions. Tony Brine, P.E., T.E. City Traffic Engineer 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: (949) 644-3329 e-mail: tbrine(a,newportbeachca.gov From: Jurjis, Seimone Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 3:00 PM To: Webb, Dave (Public Works) <DAWebb@newportbeachca.gov>; Brine, Tony <tbrine@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: FW: Clarification of Updated CEQA Guidelines 21-368 SEIMONE JURJIS, P.E., C.B.O. Community Development Department Community Development Director siuriis@newportbeochca.aov 949-644-3282 From: dave@earsi.com [mailto:dave@earsi.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 2:39 PM To: Jurjis, Seimone <siuriis@newportbeachca.gov> Cc: Harp, Aaron <aharp@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Clarification of Updated CEQA Guidelines Hi Seimone, I intent to make the following request for clarification at today's City Council meeting. Non -Agenda Item Clarification on the City's position regarding the implementation of the Resource Agencies Updated CEQA Guidelines On December 28, 2018 the Resources Agency adopted updated Guidelines for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The Updated Guidelines made significant changes reflecting recent court decisions and changes to streamline the CEQA process. One of these changes was the elimination of an analysis of a project's "Traffic" impacts and the inclusion of an analysis of a project's "Transportation" impacts. In simple terms "Traffic" is the evaluation of a project's vehicular delay and congestion. "Transportation" is the evaluation of a project's vehicular trip lengths and vehicle miles traveled. The City has published a Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project (Pa2019-014). (I support this project but feel that the parking capacity should be increased by one or more underground parking levels due to the scarcity of areas available for such uses.) The Draft CEQA document for this project does not contain an evaluation of the project's "traffic" impacts. It includes a discussion of the project's "Transportation" impacts. In contrast Consent Calendar Items 13 on today's Agenda is the award of a contract for CEQA services for the Proposed Newport Village Mixed -Use Project Located in the 2000 Block of West Coast Highway (PA2017-253). (I support Staff's conclusion an EIR be prepared for this project). However, the scope of work for this EIR includes a Traffic Study. Therefore, I request the City clarify its position on this important element of CEQA. How will "Traffic" be considered in CEQA documents? Feel free to call if you have questions. 21-369 Cheers, Dave David J. Tanner, President Environmental & Regulatory Specialists, Inc. 223 62nd Street Newport Beach, CA 92663 949 646-8958 wk 949 233-0895 cell Notice of Confidentiality: This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the address(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me by e-mail by replying to this message and permanently delete the original and any copy of any email and any printout thereof. 21-370 Community Development 1 Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, CA 92606-5208 October 21, 2019 Mr. Andy Tran City of Newport Beach Public Works Department 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 cityofirvine.org 949-724-6000 Subject: Notice of Availability and intent to Adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project in the City of Newport Beach Dear Mr. Tran: City of Irvine staff is in receipt of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project in the City of Newport Beach. The project is adjacent to Sunset Ride Park and Sunset View Park, and approximately 1,000 feet away from the coastline. The project proposes a new pedestrian and bicycle bridge overcrossing Superior Avenue, a 3.4 acre dog park, and a parking lot expansion. The project is intended to facilitate movement for pedestrians and bicyclists across Superior Avenue and provide more parking opportunities for Sunset Ridge Park. Staff reviewed the project and has no comments. If you have any questions, you may contact me at 949-724-6364 or by email at jequina@cityofirvine.org. I'uina Planner cc: Kerwin Lau, Manager of Planning Services Marika Poynter, Principal Planner 21-371 Andy Tran, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA. 92660 October 22, 2019 Deborah A. Gero 1341 Berea Place Pacific Palisades, CA. 90272 Owner of: 200 Paris Lane 112 Newport Beach, CA 93663 debigero@gmail.com RE: Draft/Initial Study/Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project Andy: I would like to take you up on your offer to submit questions that I have regarding the above report. My questions are from the perspective of the closest building at Villa Balboa (200 Paris Lane) to the dog park and from the perspective of Sunset View Park, which will be immediately adjacent to the dog park, as I have had the occasion to make personal observations and see preferences from many others in the community who currently use and appreciate Sunset View Park. When I use the word "City", I am referring broadly to the City of Newport Beach, which would include all departments, such as Recreation and Senior Services. Generally: Distance from the proposed dog park to nearest homes: What is an official and accurate measure of the closest distance of the nearest Villa Balboa unit to the dog park? It looks like three different measures used for how close residents are to the dog park. On page 52, it states that residents in the northeast are 220 feet away, page 105 states that they are 260 feet away, and the presentation dated August 6, 2019 titled "Lover Sunset View Park Conceptual Design" indicates that the distance is 250 feet. Measurement points for the study: Why were there no measurement points at Sunset View Park and Villa Balboa in the proximity of the project? For a multi story residence, should there be measurement points at various heights? Even with the existing measurement points, why doesn't the City feel that the area is over the noise limit for residential already, when the closest measuring point to the residential Villa Balboa complex measuring 67.0 (d BA Leq) (Table 4-21)? Page 1 of 5 21-372 Visitors to the parking lot and dog park: What has the City (not Chambers but the City) assumed (increased daily visits) for: Usage of the parking lot in order to justify the spend? The dog park? Does the City plan to increase scheduled activities at Sunset Ridge Park? How do Chamber's assumptions on usage compare to the City's? What's not in the report: Why is there is no reference to the traffic record on the stretch of Superior Blvd., particularly the side of the road where traffic heads inland from PCH to Ticonderoga? How would the development impact the safety record? Why is there no assessment of the City's current enforcement of leash laws or rules at the existing dog park? Was there a survey taken of the sentiment toward a dog park of the immediately adjacent 450 home Villa Balboa Community? Was the fact the Villa Balboa community has been a "no dog" community for forty (40) years considered in location selection? Was there any survey taken of the sentiment toward a dog park of the large number of current users of Sunset View Park (ex. Those who aggregate in the evening?) Specifically: 4.1 Aesthetics — Why weren't any photos taken from Sunset View Park? This park will now look directly down on the dog park. — Why hadn't the City previously maintained "large mound of dirt"? — Why wasn't it acknowledged that the "large mound of dirt" offers the best views in the area and has functioned as a de facto extension of Sunset View Park? — Lighting — How will this impact Sunset View Park? — What hours will each of the bridge, the parking lot, and the dog park be lit? Page 2 of 5 21-373 4.3 Air Quality On page 51, the document notes that "The proposed pedestrian bridge and parking lot are not anticipated to create any additional vehicle trips...". — Is this the City's assumption? — If beachgoers are now aware of additional parking in Superior, why would that not generate additional trips on Superior? — How does this reconcile with what is posted at newportbeachca.gov which states: "The existing parking lot only has 64 parking stalls and does not provide adequate parking for large organized sporting events. The primary goals of this project are to increase parking and improve pedestrian and bicycle safety and access to Sunset Ridge Park"? — In Section 4.16.1 on "Recreation", the document notes that the plan "The proposed Project includes additional parking facilities for the uses of the dog park and accommodates users of Sunset Park". 36 - 64 new spaces noted on page 6 (in reference to total spaces of 100 to 128 spaces): how can this not be generating more pollution and noise in the immediate area (addressed in a subsequent section)? — When determining additional trips for the dog park, what hours of operation were assumed? 6 am to dusk (as posted on the City's website), as are the hours at the existing Newport Beach dog park or 6 am to 11 pm, noted on page 7 as hours that the dog park operation would fall within, or other? Section 4.3.3 question on page 53 regarding impact of emissions and odors of the dog park: — Can the City or Chamber site scientific analysis? — What are the odors and biological contaminants that build up in dog parks over a day, particularly one with anticipated usage such as this one? (I assume usage is assumed to be extensive or why would the city consider spending tax dollars on building out the requisite infrastructure and providing daily maintenance). consider conditions where visitors to the dog park fail to respect all the rules and appropriately considers the "Atmospheric Setting" set out in section 4.3.2. These conditions don't seem to be considered in any way as there seems to be an assumption of perfect behavior by dog owners and the City in the Section 4.3.3. — Can the Chambers group site studies of what actually happens at dog parks regarding human behavior, particularly when the dog park is not near the dog owners home (since the nearest housing doesn't allow dogs)? — What methodology did the City use in determining use of the dog park? Does this differ from Chambers Group assumptions, methodologies, and conclusion that there will be nine or fewer vehicular trips in a day to the dog park? — Will the turf will be watered daily as noted in the report? — Will the entire park be made out of natural turf as stated? — The current Newport Beach dog park is closed for cleaning Wednesdays from 7 am to 9 am. What is the nature of this cleaning and how does it differ from the daily cleaning? 4.11. Land Uses and Planning — Why isn't the impact on Sunset View Park considered? — Why didn't the report note that the "mound of dirt" has de facto become an extension of the park, offering some of the best coastal views around? — Why does the report conclude that "The uses will be consistent with what is currently onsite" when Sunset View Park is not considered? Is this conclusion realistic if users of Sunset View Park value a quiet, serene environment with fresh air and unobstructed ocean views (currently free of fences, caged animals, and shade structures)? Page 3 of 5 21-374 4.13. Noise — Why wasn't at least one noise measurement taken at Villa Balboa or Sunset View Park? — Why do you feel confident that a reading taken on the opposite side of the street and near the street (based on the mislabeled photos in Appendix H) is appropriate to the places where people either live or sit (when visiting the park)? — Why was one twenty four hour period in summer used for measurement in a highly seasonal community? — Why was the approach that uses summary data and averages deemed appropriate? Are there other methods that use more detailed data? — Did the study consider impact on sound that the change in shape, slope, and surface of the area where the dog park will be, even absent the noise generated by the dog park? — The study seems to assume that ambient noise and noise from the new development is constant when it compares the each of the new project's noise level to that of the existing ambient noise. Are there other common approaches that would make different assumptions? — How is the study for the Beverly Hills Dog Park relevant, given that it is a park that: — is located largely in a commercial area — requires registration of dogs by Beverly Hills residents and is for the use of Beverly Hills residents — requires key fob access — limits the number of dogs that can be at the park at any one time — is a park 2 to 3 times the size of the proposed Newport Dog Park — is not in proximity to a multi family housing complex that does not allow dogs — potentially has different hours than the proposed Newport Dog Park (6 am to 11 pm in Newport Beach (unless some other hours not noted in the study are being used) vs. 6 am to 9 pm in Beverly Hills)? — has different topological considerations — Beverly Hills is flat while the proposed Newport Dog Park is up a hill? — Rincon thought another dog park study was relevant to it, which doesn't seem to be the case here? — Is there any study that shows the noise impact of a given number of barking dogs spread in various area sizes? At .2 - .3 acres, this park is substantially less than the 1 acre minimum recommendation of the National Kennel Association and the Humane Society of the United States since "smaller parks may experience overcrowding problems" (found at humanesociety.org). — Does dog barking behavior change depending on the space for a given number of dogs? — According to an August 1, 2019, article in the "Whole Dog Journal: "Parks that are small, overcrowded and boring greatly increase the likelihood of inappropriate canine behavior (fights)." How was this considered for this park of this size? — What are the range of assumptions reasonable to test for the standard attenuation rate, given the topography and atmospheric conditions at the site? — Am I reading the document correctly and we assume that the Superior Avenue measurement (Table 4-21) is a good one for the adjacent areas, at a level of 67, isn't this already in excess of residential noise limits? — What is the formula and result for adding the dog park noise to the existing noise at Sunset View Park? On page 104, there is reference to a CalEEMod estimating the trips to the dog park. — On page 51, it states that they used the assumption of trips to parks of similar small size. Why is that a reasonable assumption since a park is not a dog park? Page 4 of 5 21-375 — What did the City of Newport Beach assume when making the decision to pursue a dog park? — Appendix H: — Are the photos mislabeled? — Where is the CalEEMod work done and referenced on page 104 that indicates nine of fewer new visitors for the dog park? — What will be the process to measure the real impact of noise after the park is complete? — Will the City replace the dog park or eliminate parking if actual impact (assuming appropriate and consistent measurement) on Sunset View Park or Villa Balboa is worse than assumed in this report? 4.16. Recreation — Why was Sunset View Park not considered in the assessment in this section? — Were local residents in Villa Balboa surveyed regarding the desired use? — How will the homeless be patrolled in a dog park that has attributes desirable to the homeless — shaded benches, protected areas? Safety — NOT INCLUDED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL How has traffic safely been considered by the additional visitors to the parking area? — Could I be provided analysis the City has done on this? If it has not done this work, why not? — How are actual traffic incidents on Superior considered when additional trips are considered? — How will the bridge help to mitigate the acceleration and speeding that already occurs on Superior as vehicles head away from the beach (driving behaviors that have lead to cars jumping the curb)? Oversight and Supervision — NOT INCLUDED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL — What is the the record of the City in providing citations (other than at the high profile area at the end of Newport Beach near Huntington Beach) broadly and specifically at Sunset View Park for violations separately regarding dogs off leash and failure to pick up dog waste? — What is the history and patrol and removals for violations at the existing Newport Beach dog park? I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you. Sincerely, Deborah A. Gero Page 5 of 5 21-376 State of California — Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEWSOM, Govemor K f. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director �I South Coast Region 3883 Ruffin Road San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 467-4201 www.wildlife.ca.gov October 22, 2019 Mr. Andy Tran City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92550 atran@newpoftbeachca.gov Subject: Comments on the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge Parking Lot Project, Newport Beach, CA (SCH# 2019099074) Dear Mr. Tran: The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) has reviewed the above - referenced Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge Parking Lot, dated September 2019. The following statements and comments have been prepared pursuant to the Department's authority as Trustee Agency with jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project (California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA] Guidelines § 15386) and pursuant to our authority as a Responsible Agency under CEQA Guidelines section 15381 over those aspects of the proposed project that come under the purview of the California Endangered Species Act {Fish and Game Code § 2050 et seq.} and Fish and Game Code section 1600 et seq. The Department also administers the Natural Community Conservation Planning (NCCP) program. The City of Newport Beach (City) is a participating landowner under the Central/Coastal Orange County NCCP1Habitat Conservation Plan. The project will construct a pedestrian and bicycle bridge over Superior Avenue, connecting Sunset Ridge Park to a new asphalt parking lot located at the northeast corner of West Coast Highway, as well as create a new larger parking lot and a fenced dog park on 3.4 acres. Habitats observed on site include Artemisia califomica- Eriogonum fasciculatum shru bland (0.01 acre), ornamental landscaping (1.'19 acres), disturbed/ruderal (1.16 acres), and developed area (1.09 acres). Protocol surveys for coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila califomica califomica; Endangered Species Act- listed threatened) were conducted. We offer the following comments and recommendations to assist the City in avoiding or minimizing potential project impacts on biological resources. 1. VViith regard to burrowing owl (Achene cuniculatia; California Species of Special Concern):The MND states that, "[d]ue to the level of disturbance in the area of the ConseMing Cafifornia's Wifffife Since 1870 21-377 Mr. Andy Tran City of Newport Beach October 22, 2019 Page 3 of 5 References CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2012. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. Sacramento, California, USA. Gervais, J. A., D. K. Rosenberg, and L. A. Comrack. Burrowing Owl (Achene cunicularia) in Shuford, W.D. and T. Gardali, editors. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California, USA. 21-378 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 12 1750 EAST FOURTH STREET, SUITE 100 SANTA ANA, CA 92705 PHONE (657) 328-6310 FAX 657) 328-6510 TTY 711 www.dot.ca.go October 22, 2019 Mr. Andy Tran City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dear Mr. ran, _......... Gavin Newsom, Governor Making Conservation a California Way of Life. File: IGR/CEQA SCH #: 2019099074 IGR # 2019-01233 SR1 PM 20.37 Thank you for including -he California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the review of the Notice of Completion (NOC) for the Initial Study (IS) for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project in Newport Beach. The mission of Caltrans is to provide a safe, susta'noble, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability. The City of Newport Beach (City) proposes the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge ore crossing Superior Avenue, a new larger parking lot with a range of 100 to 128 parlcnyl spaces and a fenced dog park on an approximately 3.4 -acre site. The proposed bridge will connect Sunset Ridge Park to the new asphalt parking lot located at the northeast corner of West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. The proposed Project is located within the City of Newport Beach and is located approximately 1,000 feet from the coostl'ne. Currently, an existing City -owned parking lot with 64 metered parking stalls is located at the ^ortheast corner of this intersection. The existing Superior Parking Lot is clpproximately 0.64 acres, with the driveway to the parking lot at approximately 0.17 acres. Access to the existing parking lot is available via an entrance off Superior Avenue for vehicles, and via a concrete pathway from the intersection of Superior Avenue and Pac'fic Coast Highway (SR 1) for pedestrians and bicyclists. Directly east of the existing parking lot is an undeveloped piece of land with steep slopes with ground elevations ranging from approximately 10 feet near SR 1, to approximately 75 feet near Sunset View Park. Properties and land uses adjacent to the Project site include Sunset Ridge Park, Sunset View Park, Villa Balboa and Newport Crest residential communities, and the lower campus of Hoag Hospital. A shopping center and the Lido Sands residential community are located to the south across SR 1 from the Project site. SR 1 is owned and operated by Caltrans. Caltrans is a responsible agency and has the following comments: "Provide a sae, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability" 21-379 City of N wport Beach October 2, 2019 Page 2 Traffic Operations: 1. In the Initial Study, Section 2.3.4 mentions that construction will take 14-18 months for completion and it will avoid the fall and spring months. Please note that temporary lane closure or significant increase in construction traffic along Pacific Coast Highway between Memorial Day and Labor Day is not recommended. 2. In the Initial Study, Section 2.3.4 also mentions that construction will occur during the daytime hours of 7am to 4:30pm. Please note that temporary closures on Pacific Coast Highway should only be between the hours of 9am to Spm. fro jeci Management There is a Safety Improvement project by Caltrans (OQ830K) that proposes to modify traffic signals and add safety lighting at the intersection of SR 1 and Superior Avenue. Caltrans' project may conflict with the City's future improvement project at this intersection. Please contact Caltrans Project Marcger, Bob Bazargan at oob.bazaraan@dot.ca.gov or (657) 328-6298, in order to coordinate all project stages and development for the Superior Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge and Parking Lot Project. Transportation Planning 1. Co-sider including wayfinding signage for pedestrians and bicyclists in the project vicinity. This will encourage the use of Active Transportation and improve safe `v for Active Transportation users. 2. Co-isider providing secure bicycle storage on the project site, especially near Sunset Ridge Park. This will encourage visitors to utilize Active Transportation to access the site, thus improving air qua'.ity and reducing congestion. 3. Ensure that the project will be accessible to ADA -reliant visitors. In the subsequent phases, consider discussing how ADA -reliant users will access the proposed parking lot from the intersection of Superior Avenue and West Coast Highway. Providing ADA -compliant accessibility will ensure that all visitors, regardless of abili`y, will have access to the site and its services, as well as access to the coos al zone. 4. There are existing pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities near or adjacent to the site, including regionally significant trails and corridors like the Santa Ana River Trail, Banning Channel Bikeway. and Pacific Coast Highway. During construction, Caltrans recommends that appropriate detours and safety measures are in place that prioritize the mobility, access, and safety of bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit users. If sidewalks, bike lanes, or transit stops need to be "Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability" 21-380 City of Newport Beach October 22, 2019 Page 3 closed during construction, please ensure that closures and detours are clearly signed. 5. Should any existing bike lanes be closed during construction, we recommend the use of "May Use Full Lane" (MUTCD R4-1 1) signage rather than "Share the Road" (W16-1 P) signage to more clearly indicate to both drivers and bicyclists that bicyclists may ride in the center of the travel lane while the bike lane is closed. Permits: Any project work proposed in the vicinity of the State right of way will require an encroachment permit, and all environmental concerns must be adequately addressed. Please coordinate with Caltrans in order to meet the requirements for any work within or near State Right -of -Way. A fee may apply. If the cost of work within the State right of way is below one Million Dollars, the Encroachment Permit process will be handled by our Permits Branch; otherwise the permit shuld be authorized through the Caltrans's Project Development Department. W n applying for Encroachment Permit, please incorporate all Environmental Dol umentation, SWPPP/ WPCP, NPDES, Hydraulic Calculations, R/W certification and all relevant design details including design exception approvals. For specific details for Encroachment Permits Orocedure, please refer to the Caltrans's Encroachment Permits Manual. The latest edition of the Manual is available on the web site: http://www.dot.ca._ o /hvo q/traffops/developsery/permits/ Please continue to coordinate with Caltrans for any future developments that could potentially impact State transportation facilities. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Julie Lugaro at 657-328-6368 or Julie.luaaro@dot.ca.gov. Sincerely, Scott Shelley Branch Chief, Regional-IGR-Transit Planning District 12 "Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability" 21-381 Lindeman, Marie From: Mary <mepetropo@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 9:15 AM To: Dept - City Council Subject: Dog Park in West Newport FOLLOW UP At a Villa Balboa HOA Meeting after your meeting last Tuesday, we were informed that approximately 44 residents attended the City meeting to voice their opposition to the Dog Park location. Just an FYI, to help put things in perspective, there are 550 residences in Villa Balboa. Therefore, Less than 10% of Villa Balboa residents/owners attended to voice their opposition. Please keep this in mind as you cast your vote at the November meeting. Thank you Mary Petropoulos Karen Paul Villa Balboa Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 14, 2019, at 8:39 AM, Mary <mepetropo@gmail.com> wrote: > There is much discussion surrounding the Dog Park in West Newport. We are unable to attend the meeting on Tuesday, however, we would like to express our support for the location. We are dog owners. > There are a number of 'scare -mongers" going door-to-door in Villa Balboa, opposing the park saying it will negatively impact home values, and we anticipate they will be out in force at the Tuesday meeting. We do not agree with their assumptions. There are approximately 74+ KNOWN dogs in our community. Nearby Newport Crest has many more. Most of these dogs walk along Sunset View park, 2-3x daily, directly in front of Villa Balboa homes. There are issues such as barking, poop, etc., all along the pathway. It would be so nice to have a dog park nearby which might help alleviate some of these issues. Its an excellent location and far enough away from the closest VB building to have little or no impact. We are supposedly a "No dogs allowed community". The demographics of our area are changing, and more and more families are choosing to have a pet. > We appreciate your willingness to hear all sides of the issue, and encourage you to move ahead with the dog park at this location. > Mary Petropoulos > Karen Paul > Villa Balboa > Newport Beach > Sent from my iPhone 21-382 Andy Tran, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: 949-644-3315 October 19, 2019 Michael Call Cell (714) 791-1102 210 Lille Lane 208 Newport Beach, CA 93663 onecall4alll@verivon.net There are 4 total pages. The following questions are unless otherwise indicated in reference to the proposed dog park included in the Lower Sunset View Park Conceptual Design located in Newport Beach California and the word "City" refers to the City of Newport Beach. When there is a reference to "the report" this means any reports or documentation produced by the City including the Mitigation Negative Declaration and any other environmental documentation provided by the City. Your timely response to these questions is requested so as to provide adequate time for follow up questions and/or responses. 1. Very specifically describe the public demand by any individual or group for dog parks? A. In Newport Beach? B. In west Newport Beach? C. At the specific location cited in the Sunset View Park proposal? D. How were these specific demands made and recorded? E. Has there been any survey of nearby residents or current visitors to Sunset View Park? 2. Is the proposed dog park in some way to provide an alternative to the illicit dog park located in and alongside of the Santa Ana river? 3. Is the proposed dog park being considered an alternative to the enforcement of the present leash laws? 4. Are there any statistics for? A. The number of persons that reside in Newport Beach that use dog parks? B. The number of injuries to dogs and humans at the existing dog park? 1 21-383 C. The numbers of individual dogs and humans that have contracted a disease or a parasite at the existing dog park? 5. Have the contributors to the Environmental Study demonstrated expertise in the size and structure of the Dog Park? 6. Can the contributor's site studies from the scientific literature which discuss the volume of noise from given projected numbers of barking dogs concentration in given spaces? 7. What expertise do the contributors have as to dog park design in general and specifically to space requirements as it relates to safety of the dogs and human users? 8. What is the minimum safe dog park size? A. What studies did the contributors rely on to make this conclusion? B. How does park size effect dog crowd behavior? 9. Why is it the environmental report does not recommend safe guards for overcrowding and proper separation distances for extremely small parks of this size? 10. What guarantees and enforceable promises are there that the staff, designers and/or engineers will not increase size of the dog park without further review or public comment? 12. What are the assumptions and/or the methods used for the standard attenuation rate, given the topography and atmospheric conditions at the site? 13. Are there any studies of the effect of the removal of the mound of dirt? A. Would the removal of the mound of dirt cause an increase of noise at the park and at in the Villa Balboa Community? 14. Is the City staff aware, as cited in the environmental study, at the proposed location of the dog park, the sound levels are already in excess to the City's existing permissible levels? 15. Will the City proposal for the dog park likely magnify the noise level with its present design? 16. Will the City be taking this opportunity to mitigate the noise levels that have already been determined to be in excessive by the Cities environmental report? 17. Is the City aware that almost all other dog parks are on commercial or industrial cites NOT immediately adjacent to (and as importantly accessible to) a densely populated residential community on highly valuable land long treasured for other uses? 18. Why is there no discussion of the health hazards of a critical care hospital in close proximity to the proposed dog park? A. Why is there no discussion in the report of the constant use of the existing parks walkway by Hoag Hospital doctors, nurses, technicians, administrators often wearing their scrubs and patients as a probable transportation of pest and infectious diseases to this critical care hospital and even directly to patients with compromise immune systems? 2 21-384 19. Why does the report not address the fact that the proposed dog park will disrupt existing recreational activities? A. Why does the report not discuss the interference of the proposed dog park with the present terrain and continuity of park and recreation from Sunset Ridge Park on the west all the way to Hoag Hospital on the east? B. Many individuals enjoy the view the Huntington Beach Air Show and celebrate Independence Day by watching the fireworks all along the coast from Huntington Beach all the way to Laguna Beach from our favorite park. People enjoy the view and serene environment most every evening of the year. Why does the report not discuss the present natural and cultural resources and recreational usage includes all the citizens of Newport Beach and surrounding communities' visiting the park? 20. Is the City aware that the Villa Balboa Community, the predominate nearby community, is now and has always been a no dog development? A. Is the City aware that the original CCRs which are still in effect prohibit dogs in the Villa Balboa development? B. Is the City aware that the Villa Balboa association as obtained an attorney's letter stating the opposition to the proposed dog park? C. Has it been considered that the current quite enjoyment by humans (including hopefully compliant dog owners with their dogs) does not diminish the enjoyment of this unique and widely used location by others? 21. Why does the report not discuss the negative impact on property values caused by the loss of the quiet enjoyment of nearby homeowners? A. Why does the report not have any proximity study of the impact of the lack of substantial buffers to significant residential communities? B. Why does the report not discuss or study the impact of a dog park being super -imposed on the highly valued ocean view home in direct proximity? 22. Why does the report not compare and contrast other uses to determine the highest and best use? A. Why does the report not analyze the highest and best use for the public good comparing a dog park to alternative recreational activities at the property like workout trails and courses? B. Why does the report no explore completing the View Park to enhance the viewing experience for visitors? 23. Why does the report not explore or discuss the overburden and abusive allocation of services in west Newport Beach as exampled by the: 1. New Homeless Shelter and SOS Kitchen, 2. PCH Noise, 3. Illegal Dog Beach, 4. Nightly Police helicopter flyovers? 24. Why does the report not explore or discuss the overburden and abusive allocation of services on the Villa Balboa Community as exampled by the: 1. Cogent Plant presently out of compliance noise, plums of gases and negative effect on homeowner views and the continuing cost of damages to the exterior of the Villa Balboa Structures, 2. Hoag future campus expansion, 3. Ambulance noise, 4. Night time 3 21-385 required helicopter flights over head to meet the contractual fly over time, 5. Superior Bridge (Prospective) and 6. Expanded Adjacent Parking (Prospective)? 21-386