HomeMy WebLinkAboutIS015_NEWPORT HARBOR SHIPYARD 15015
❑ 500 newport center drive, suite 525
newport beach, california 92660
phone (714) 640.6363
! ❑ 2927 newbury street, suite c
Lsa berkeley, caiifornia 94703
phone (415) 841-6840
LARRY SEEMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
INITIAL STUDY
REDEVELOPMENT OF THE
NEWPORT HARBOR SHIPYA D
•
PREPARED FOR
i
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663
PREPARED BY
LARRY SEEMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
500 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 525
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
(714) 640-6363
i NOVEMBER 30, 1979
1
Lsa
t. TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION l
Purpose of Study l
! Project Location 1
Project Description 1
Permits 1
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 7 ,
7 Land Use 7
Demolition and Bulkhead Construction 8
Water Quality 9
Circulation and Parking 10
Aesthetics 1.1
!
!
r
!
1
i
Lsa
• LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURES
• Figure 1 - Regional Location Map 2•
Figure 2 - Local Context Map 3
Figure 3 - Aerial View of Site 4
Figure 4 - Existing Topographic Map 5
Figure 5 - Site Development Plan 6
•
1
Wa
• INTRODUCTION
PURPOSE OF STUDY,
This Initial Study has been prepared in order to assist the City of
• Newport Beach in assessing the individual and cumulative impacts of the .
proposed redevelopment of the Newport Harbor Shipyard. This study ad-
dresses all of the areas where the project could potentially have a sig-
nificant impact on the environment.
This study has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of
• the State EIR Guidelines and the City of Newport Beach Guidelines for
Implementation of. :CEQA,
PROJECT LOCATION
The proposed project is located on the northeast corner.of 21st Street
• and Arcade (223 21st Street), in the Cannery Village area of Newport Beach.
The :site fronts on the Rhine Channel , across the street from the Spaghetti
Factory Restaurant. The project location is shown on Figures 7 and 2.
Figure 3 shows the site from an aerial perspective.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project consists of a resubdivision of the .31 acre
(13,503 sq.ft.) site-, upgrading and remodeling of the existing on-site
structures, upgrading and partial reconstruction of the existing bulk
head, and construction of a new ship launching elevator system (hydrolic
lift facility) and maintenance surface area. The bulkhead would be con-
structed along the U.S. Bulkhead Line and the elevator extended to the
U.S. Pierhead Line. The existing site conditions are illustrated in
Figure d while the proposed development plan is shown in Figure
PERMITS
•! The proposed project would require a use permit, a grading permit, a
harbor permit, an Army Corps of Engineers permit and a Costal Commission
permit, building permit and an environmental determination by the City
Environmental Affairs Committee.
•
' FIGURE 1 2
REGIONAL LOCATION MAP
Lsa
LOS ANGELES SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY COUNTY
RIVERSIDE
COUNTY
RIVERSIDE FWY
r
GARDEN FWY
GROVE
H
O'E00 4 S7H9 ``
♦ oty CLEVELAN D.
QOp Y NATIONAL
_a FOREST
� 1
f
PROJECT SITE
SAN DIEGO
* COUNTY
I •
FIGURE 2 3
LOCAL CONTEXT MAP
Lsa
City \ Y � '- .t_ •c
sr
s
Lignto
• PROJECT SITE � 33 ,c� txnt
enas c r
Park r
NEWPOR`T
Lz
• - ewp°r-f .=,•:: Park... ..�...
39
238
J NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. ,
j �, N3335—W11752.5/lOX7.5
•
FIGURE 3 4
AERIAL VIEW OF SITE
Lsa
�....����yam. .1.. �Y' ;C,�^ '4. �-�r•�'�� v �`u.-
• '"^'- c w r.��r�.,rjrF�;z xn.� '<'�;`��' � �•.. � .y n.q^? �'"``...,�,tryg�,„
` `R.�..t'piF�Sary� 3?•''{«:�t.�F ..�/ ,sr rw_••.aU / ',s_-<,:.V.w^ •r�aurx' �•... '.. •
• M1 � ilJft 1 Y,.
J.I +Y" ��L��'•f'' '/�`:�•r ;� Cry-y:f�..� t 4i 4'��1. �•dt.,.�,,+. •w rxa -
aS'' h,>lw;ti 1^ i .�s.Nt•*^'S�x,`.T^ �(�,%e'�",,,..t:ia:•>+ >'+•'
t +_ .? .ram.. -� - % .�;r-• ^Y"> r `�?%r �r. ,:
�.j, }�s� Ham;, Ya t �'���• +' _ _ ��q
•^ ^ y'E�`1- +r. nit :.,:qt �rr�� • ® ® dirg, .4 /oi'.w ,._q
This t a ri,� Y� � * � ��.j+��.,,�� 1 , yy�,+ 1 _ .R' _ �• w.
,• es'"r.,i x • (N,�., � yr;:y ���`� uwti'p' � ��w"
SY�, 4`?•!�'a'` � lr^.b''�hti: f 9� .y'� �� .:•� - �-'r � �i I• ,
,+ •.',~ w, t %�iy Lti � >%:,S`„*:w;;.N, s: 't :+' •=l�ia a1TnY.�:i c�tr,`., •,.r.��ek�•,` _
'� .fy �., 1'.�t, n!-,. L t ra!'.st t.,E,•'4,�,—. fyr,
\�, '�i �• i`'"*"�" �C�`;M1 k,+:F; jY'-�i'i',.'y's:�,'y`sa° !.�,',�� !9:a{ f h:�r f,'��'"� :^rf;,K{;:�k:�W'�,,+� i 7�J;:;�
0
BASIS Or BEARINGS YOMIYEN7 NOTCB VSENCHUARK' " �•r•'✓ �•fQ• A IORTgN 0/ LOT a 01 TACT M0.•N.•Y.Y. 2{f W.]a:
FIGURE 4 � -y.wIOTf I'.11.4M MIO a ►pRT10M 01 IYT 1/ IN atpCK Sb
..•.f- OI SECTION A. MC,IOT BEACH. Y.Y. A/i,: AMO a
•r.- PORTION OFISCC7pN 11. TOMNfNI► • /OYTM• RIIMOC qWEST. •AN IWRII No YERIO„M.
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC MAP �f•--�_�.••' tN�TNE an or Neroni BEACN,
ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA.
TRACT
' ! N NO. 81 f �� GIKryRAL warts=
r�
w "+ri,-f:ie'••/' SCaLL: 1 O- IZ�Yir.�ia(•.,.).r..).
-K IL•yY(^��N�-Y _ l-•�•..,.. ...•. .Y....Y ZI I••.• MMI I•-../.1.•-•l •�•�'•)
r Q /S� �" ( - L. s •' iZ � 1- i )i 2Li � ��•�h• wr.
Qc
it
EIJ
gj
•t ` _ �'l :�I. tel:-... A
l TIC/V A ' �;c4tlPOR7 66ACH
BLCCK
.SEC ,
{Ty . :::. 22/ , ' ' ' =--� ; I4 _ 3
'lisp all
14
13 µ,u IrL KI
�-_•::�':••'-.: .'':.•�'1-.:. 1 ram.
X.
_it•�r:-_?s �.:i'•' •:i :i' .i+�•:'.�. •• �— . I��-� T'T�'r•�-�. A.a.M""1 y+ Na.
VIA
IL
aA STREET z+r�
f
f -
I
FIGURE 5 6
`SITE DEVELDPMENT PLAN
JLLsa
mnir
ale. .� aavLeriH r
' SrornvtD.
1 f tt .. •. -
F — 'q:d
it ! -
40
' ••f �•i .M a , ter" ..�t •.� �•-
• �`• �• ��r. _�? �� . .�1��'• . a +.� -. �'/�
C` � M� �1•� � • I 4NI
a I :i M� ♦ � t< 4 •�
f
7
Lsa
• ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
This study focuses on issues which potentially could be impacted by the
proposed project. These issues include land use, demolition and bulkhead
construction, water quality, circulation and aesthetics.
LAND USE
Existing Conditions. The site is located in the. 'southern end of Cannery
Village, an area oT mixed commercial , light industrial , marine, and visitor-
serving facilities: The site itse.lf has been used for many years as a boat
f yard. Major uses in the immediate vicinity of the site include Bertram
Yacht Sales, the Spaghetti Factory Restaurant, the Crab Cooker Restaurant,
and various marine contractors.
The site is designated on the land use element of the General Plan as
Recreation/Marine Commercial . The General Plan calls for the development
• of a Specific Plan for the Cannery Village. There have been several studies
completed in the area, but no plan has yet been adopted. The zoning for the
site is C-2.
Impacts. The proposed project includes as a primary use, the continua-
tion of the existing boat yard. This is consistent with the General Plan and
• Zoning for the site pending issuance of a use permit and will not adversely
impact adjacent uses. The applicant proposes to provide additional on-site
maintenance storage and landscaping adjacent to 21st. Street. This project ,-
would enhance the marine character of the Rhine Channel area andnwould pre
serve 'much needed marine services.
• A secondary use for the project includes upgrading the approximately
2,208 square feet of office building on the west 'end of the project site.
Provided that this office space is used for marine related purposes, it is
also consistent with the General Plan and Zoning.
Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measures are included as
• part of the projector are otherwise required to offset potential adverse
impacts.
1. , A Harbor Permit, Army Corps of Engineers Permit and a CoastaZ
Commission Permit miZZ be securred for the proposed project.
2. The property owner mitt transfer the Harbor Permit to the
applicant.
49
B
Lsa
3. Appropriate restrictions will be recorded against the property to
insure that the proposed office space wilt be used as an ancillary
use to the primary use of the marine service and repair.
4. The proposed marine service and repair facility will be continued
on the site as -indicated by the site plan.
DEMOLITION AND BULKHEAD CONSTRUCTION
Existing Conditions. The site is immediately adjacent to the mouth of
the Rhine Channel which because of its relatively poor water circulation has
generally poor water quality. In addition, debris collects at the end of
• the channel , and whi'le this is not a serious environmental problem, it is
aesthetically unpleasing..
Impacts. The existing structures will be remodeled and upgraded. The
'concrete maintenance surface will be completely removed and a new-surface
• installed which will accommodate the rail transfer tracks of the marine
elevator. Improvements to the bulkhead will include removal and recon-
struction of some parts of the existing bulkhead and repair of the remaining
bulkhead area. Figure 5 in the Project Description identifies the area which
will be replaced and those which will require repair.
• During the maintenance surface removal process, subsequent to recon-
struction, there will be a potential for debris and pollutants 'to be in-
troduced into the bay. This is a normal condition adjacent to the bay
and the potential impacts can be readily controlled.
Due to the absence of an intertidal zone and the assumed levels of heavy
• metals in the vicinity of the boat yard, •it is generally recognized that the
proposed bulkhead improvements would not have a significant effect provided
that the bulkhead is located behind the Bulkhead Line so that there would be
no reduction in the water volume of the Rhine Channel and that dredging
requirements be limited to 200 cubic yards.
• Mitigation Measures. The follo4iing impact control measures are included
as part of the project as are otherwise required to offset adverse 'impacts.
S. During construction activities, debris wilt be prevented from en-
tering the bay through the use of traps and containment booms in
a manner satisfactory to the Community Development and Marine "
• departments.
•
• 9
• 6. The site wiZZ be subject to a grading permit to be approved by"the
Department of Community DeveZopment.
7. An erosion and dust control pZxn wiZZ be submitted with the grading
permit application and wiZZ be subject to the approvaZ of the
• Director of Con msnity DeveZopment.
8. The erosion and siltation controZ pZan will be approved by the
California RegionaZ Water QuaZity Control Board (Santa Ana Region).
The plan must be submitted to the Board ten days prior to initiating
construction activities.
9. The proposed buZkhead wiZZ be certified safe for the proposed pro-
ject by a registered engineer.
WATER QUALITY.
Existing Conditions. As mentioned above, the Rhine Channel has poor
vrater circulation and limited flushing action. Previous water sampling
studies have indicated that the water quality in the Rhine Channel is
poor. Low levels of dissolved oxygen, concentrations of heavy metals,
lack of clarity, and floating debris are the primary problems in the
• channel .
It is assumed that there is a heavy concentration of heavy metals in
the immediate vicinity of the existing boat yard from marine paints and
petroleum product uses in operating and maintaining the vessels using the
yard.
Impacts. Construction impacts in the channel area have been
discussed above. Therefore, this section will address the impacts of
operating the new yard.
Any boat yard operation, because of the nature of the operation and its
'� . Any
to the bay, poses potential water quality problems. The proposed
project, with the flat work area and surrounding bulkhead, represents a
possible improvement from a water quality perspective. Runoff can be con-
trolled and pollutants and debris cleaned up prior to entering the bay.
' Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measures are recommended:
10. The applicant wiZZ maintain the site in a clean and orderZy manner
and wiZZ provide for periodic debris collection and disposaZ.
10
L
• 11. The appZicant wiZZ provide on-site retention basins (i.e. grease '
traps) and for their maintenance.
12. A provision for weekZy debris cZeanup under the proposed boat
hoist facility wiZZ be made.
• 13. The appZicant wiU provide for weekZy -vacuum sweeping of aZ2 surface
parking areas.
14. The appZicant wiU provide an on-site retention basin (i.e. debris
catch basin) to prevent debris from entering the,bay, and to provide .
for continuous maintenance, subject to Marine Department inspection.
CIRCULATION AND PARKING
The following analysis is based on a study prepared by William Kunzman
and Associates.
• Existing Conditions. The site is located on the northeast corner of
Arcade and 21st Street. Arcade is one-way southbound with one travel lane
and parking on both sides. The existing boat yard provides vehicular access
from Arcade.
• Impacts.
Traffic Generation. The traffic generation of the proposed project
will be 'mim mal . Office land use generates 13 trips per day per 1 ,000 square
feet_ The modification to the boat yard will probably not increase traffic
generation of that which exists today for this site. The total additional
generation will be 10 to 20 trips per day which is insignificant, and in fact
undetectable on the street system.
Parking Requirements. Parking' requirements call for four spaces per
thousand square feet of office. Determining parking needs for the boat yard
is difficult, but six spaces appears adequate. There are six employees, and
• eight spaces allow two visitor spaces beyond the employee parking needs.
If sufficient spaces are not provided on-site, the result will be on-
street parking. On-street parking is currently a problem in the general
area, and additional on-street parking will add to the problem. _.
•
•
Lsa
• Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measures are included as. .
part of the project or otherwise required to offset possible adverse impacts.
15. Parking space will be provided in accordance with the standards of
the Newport Beach MunicipaZ Code and with the approval of the Public
• Works Department.
16. The finaZ design of the parking lot will be approved by the City's
Public Works Department.
AESTHETICS
Existing Conditions. The site is presently vacant except for the one
building on site. No commercial activity occurs on site and the area is
fenced and posted "No Trespassing". In this condition the site does not
contribute nor detract for the visual/aesthetic quality of the area. The
site is visible from the Arcade, 21st Street, the Rhine Channel and from
• the mobile home park across the channel on the Lido Peninsula.
Impacts.
Construction activities including dredging, bulk head construction, and
marine elevator installation will create short term visual impacts to the
'• surrounding areas.
Operation of the boat yard, while perhaps visually unattrative to some
viewers, will be characteristic of the unique marine sales and maintenance .
atmosphere of the Cannery Village Community and as such should not represent
',• a visual incongruitity in the area.
Mitigation Measures. The following im)act control measures are included
in the project or are otherwise required to offset- adverse impacts.
17. The project will be landscaped as depicted on -the site plan. _
• 18. The landscape plan will be subject to the review of the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Department and approval of the Planning
Department.
19. The landscape plan will include an irrigation plan designed to
minimize water usage and prevent over watering.
20. The landscape plan will include a maintenance program which
controls the use of fertilizers and pesticides.
12
Lsa
• 21. The landscape plan will place heavy emphasis on the use of drought-
resistant native vegetation.
22. The project will comply with the Uniform Building Code Z976 'require-
ments.
• 23. FinaZ design of the project will provide for the incorporation of
water-saving devices for project lavatories and other water-using
facilities.
•
•
•
• r AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 29th day of October,
1979, by and between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and LARRY SEEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ,
hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT."
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the CITY has determined that an Initial Study is necessary
in conjunction with the development of Newport Harbor Boatyard, in the
City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of California; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has submitted to CITY a proposal to prepare said
Initial Study; and
WHEREAS, CITY desires to accept said proposal .
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties hereto
agree as follows:
1 . GENERAL
CONSULTANT agrees to prepare the subject Initial Study in accordance
with the requirements set forth in Paragraph 2 of this Agreement. CITY agrees
to remit to CONSULTANT the amounts set forth in Paragraph 3 of this Agreement
in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this document.
2. SCOPE OF WORK
The subject Initial Study will be prepared in accordance with the
CONSULTANT'S proposal dated October 26, 1979, which is attached to this
Agreement marked as Exhibit "B" and by reference incorporated herein at this
point as if fully set forth.
3. BILLING AND PAYMENT
CONSULTANT shall be paid under this Agreement on a time and material
basis and in no event shall the maximum amount of this Agreement exceed One
Thousand Eight Hundred and No Dollars ($1 ,800.00) . Partial payments shall be
made by CITY to CONSULTANT upon CONSULTANT'S presentation of statements
verifying the time and material costs incurred by it in connection with this
Agreement.
- 1 -
0 i
4. FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
CONSULTANT shall use diligent efforts to complete this contract by
November 9, 1979. The subject Initial Study must meet the approval of the
Environmental Affairs Committee of the City. In the event additional work is
required due to input during the public hearings, said additional work shall
be subject to a separate contract.
5. TERMINATION
This Agreement is subject to termination by the CITY at any time
upon serving written notice to CONSULTANT. The CITY shall be thereafter liable
to CONSULTANT only for fees and costs incurred as of the date CONSULTANT receives
such notice of termination.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Agreement
as of the date and year first above written.
APPROVED AS TP FORM CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
4 A 4 �� 0-
City A orney D re or
mmu ity Development Department
CITY
LARRY SEEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CONSULTANTS
By v:A-,4
CONSULTANT
- 2 -
• �Ex,l ;b►r C3
❑ 500 newport center drive, suite 525
newport beach, California 92660
phone (714) 640.6363
❑ berk l e bury, Cali street, suite c
Lsa Berkeley, California 94703
phone (415) 841-6840
LARRY SEEMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
October 26, 1979.
Mr. Fred Talarico
Environmental Coordinator
Community Development Department
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663
SUBJECT: NEWPORT HARBOR SHIPYARD
Dear Fred:
Larry Seeman Associates is pleased to submit this proposal to prepare a
Draft Initial Study for the subject project. We understand the project will
consist : of a resubdtvision of the .31 acre (1 ,380 sq. ft.) site located at
223 21st Street, Newport Beach, remodeling of the existing on-site structures,
upgrading to the existing bulkhead, construction of a new yacht launching
system, and modification of the existing exposed maintenance surface areas,
The project as proposed conforms with the existing C-2 Zoning District pend-
ing issuance of a conditional use permit (CUP). An environmental determina-
tion is required prior to issuance of the CUP.
SCOPE OF WORK
In order to provide the City staff with all the information it needs to
evaluate the environmental impacts of the project, we propose the following
scope of services.
1 . ' IT
acts f Redevelopment (i .e. demolition and upgrading). We will
review to e method of demolition proposed by the applicant and
provide impact control measure design to lessen or offset any '
potentially significant adverse environmental effects. A particular
concern of this analysis will be disturbances to the existing am-
bient noise environment, created during demolition and reconstruc-
tion.
Mr. Fred Talarico
October 26, 1979
Page 2
Lsa
2. Water Quality and Marine Ecology. This discussion will provide an
assessment of the impacts upon water quality and marine ecosys-
tems by the proposed project. This analysis will address both
short term impacts associated with construction, and long term
impacts of use. Included will be hydrologic characteristics and
institutional considerations attibutable to the various agencies
concerned with point and non-point source water pollution.
3. Land Use Impacts. We will review the project for its conformance
with applicable City policies, the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance,
and other standards. Also, we will assess this project for its
performance with respect to the South Coast Region of the State
Coastal Commission, and the City Local Coastal Program.
4. Circulation/Access/Parking. We will review the proposal site plan
to assess the adequacy of the on-site circulation and parking
accommodations. Additionally, we will contact the U.S. Coast Guard
to ascertain the adequacy of the local maritime navigation and
circulation in the vicinity of the project site.
5. Aesthetics. We will analyze the visual and aesthetic impacts of
this project. This discussion will utilize on and off-site photos,
and graphic rendering if available.
6. Other Impacts. If, in the course of our assessment, additional
issues of concern or if significant environmental impacts are
identified, we will prepare the needed impact control strategies.
STAFF
Mr. Bert Ashland will direct this study and will be responsible for
liaison with the City, applicant and other agencies, He will be assisted
as needed by Mr. William Foley.
FEES
We will prepare the Initial Study for a fee of $1 ,800,00. It is
understood that this fee does not include attendance at any public hearings
or committee meetings.
SCHEDULE
We will prepare and submit this Initial Study within two weeks of
Mr. Fred Talarico
October 26, 1979
Page 3
Lsa
acceptance of this proposal .
If you have any questions or require further information, please contact
me.
Sincerely,
LARRY SEE MAN ASSOCIA ES, INC.
• rt Ashland
Project Director
BA:hf
A - 1451- -- - -
- -- - --- - -- ----- ------ - -- - -
--- --- - - - -
+�I
0
4 -
-------- ----- - --- - - -- ------- - - -
-- - - - ---- ---- ---- --- - - - ------ --- -- - - --- - -
i
I -
-- - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - -
\n
RECEIVED
Q ` Community
Doveiopmf.-nt i
Dept
C ; uF
^ NE k 1' t3EACH.
l'
9
G 1
r R E C EJNlE D �b Howard C. Bishop III
wmmucsny
DevefoppLment 1748 Bonaire Way
De
OCT 2 519MP- 9 Newport Beach, CA 92660
*,rff as
J*F-W?CA9 FJEWH,
CAU
October 24,1979
!j
J
Mr. Fred Talarico ^'
Environmental Coordinator
City of Newport Beach
CMIMmity Development
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Subject: NEWPORP HARBOR SHIPYARD INC., 223 21st. Street, Newport Beach
Newport Harbor Shipyard Inc. will be one of the finest shipyards on the West
Coast, both in appearance and in the quality of workmanship offered to the
public.
The basic business of Newport Harbor Shipyard Inc. will be hauling, repairing
and painting yachts up to 70 feet in length.
We will be installing a Syncrolift ship-Uft and transfer system for the purpose
of hauling and launching yachts. The Syncrolift will be a great asset to the
Newport Beach yachting community, it is one of the finest systems and is used
world wide. Please see accompanying brochure. This equipment has been
purchased.
The property has an existing two story building which will be completely re-
modeled and upgraded using a Medi.tarranean Spanish motif, including tile roof.
It will be the most outstanding building in the area. We will be constructing
a separate building, using the satte motif, for safe storage of paint.
Business hours will be 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Nbnday through Friday. The business
will not employ more than six people. Ernployee parking will be provided, plus
two guest spots.
The existing broken bulkhead will be repaired. Existing concrete will be
resurfaced, and city approved filtered drain system will be installed.
It is our belief that this project will not only enhance the City of Newport
Bea , but provide a valuable service to the yachting community.
HOWARD C. BISHOP III
J�
RECEIVEW �•
1ffi Community)
Development
OCT 2 51979>- xl
CITY OF
` t4r*WPC BEACH, IQ
APPENDIX H N
Date Filed
Environmental Information Form
(To be completed by applicant)
GENERAL INFORMATION p
1. Name and address of developer or project Sponsor: /,foWA2/7
/74C/ g0A)A1/L0F 1A1AX AhF1J
2. Address of project: 2a '2l5f STR1:> ��k/Po/Gf 3�ACN GA.
Assessor's Block and Loti um er Oa 02 AC Q14
LOTS , 1Z, ►s, 14 f Vo�TlolJ (=
►I f_OT 1f fyGUGK 221
3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to bNc��aR�edp
concerning this project: 21 A JtrA MME
NEwPoAr 13r,.u �� a�a i pid 4-
4. Indicate number of the per it application for the project tr
1 which this form pertains: g 1�/U!5/DA1. GLZA01A;50 --
a an escr a any o er related permits and other public
approvals required for this project, including those required by
city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5TAU UJAT61Z
QOIrLUTIPM 60ASTILG 4QMMr5SI-*ft11
6. Existing zoning district: 6'2
7, Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is Mod) :
BOAT 2EPA12
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
8. Site size. /07t X 40F K /60 �K /dd*
9, Sgaare footage. 131gf6*1
lo. No*ber of floors of construction. Z FlO/�g 22a$� �'osAG•
ki19m To 8B �ZEtyAp�G��
l I , Amu,lnt of off'-street parking t?r•ovld 8
1� . AI.Lach plaris. YSS
11. Proposed scheduling. M v'
111 . Associated projects . Nome
I'„ Anticipated Incremental development. �/
x2
lb. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of
unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household
size expected. WFJF,,
17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city
or regionally oriented square footage of sales area, and loading
facilities. AO 5ALW AMEAt vat6.4946 4%ca or: BoA-r HorSr.
18. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift,
and loading facilities. s////*r, _ 4. eAA )
19. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities,
and community benefits to be derived from the project. 56
20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning
application, slate this and indicate clearly why the application
is required. 47
Are the following items applicable to the project or,its effects?
Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as
necessary) .
YES H0
✓ 21. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands,
"— beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration or
ground contours. $Q4'P HOlST'.
22. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing
"— residential areas or public lands or roads.
✓ 23. Change in pattern; scale or character of general
area of project.
_ ✓ 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
V 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in
—' vicinity. AJOOA, VUST' -fieoM (AQV)VC►,
26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water
quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage
patterns.
27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration
levels in the vicinity.
28. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more.
29. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials,
' such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives.
N
APPENDIX I
FNVIRONMENTAL CHECYLIST FORM
Environmental Checklist Form
(To Be Completed By Lead Agency)
I. Background
I. Name of Proponent NbWA(LO RiSAOP
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 1748 t3o,(1AAS WA1Y
AljfUj?KLT 1A c 14 CA
3. Date of Checklist Submission
4. Agency Requiring Checklist 1/
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable eopoar 1.FIMR.
II. Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybes' answers are required on attached
sheets.)
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in v
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, com—
paction or overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground ✓
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or modi—
fication of any unique geologic or �. .
physical features? --
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion v
of soils, either on or off the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of
beach sands, or changes in siltation,
deposition or erosion which may modify
the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or
' lake?
73
^ wII
113
✓ 30. Substantial change in demand for municipal services
_ (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) .
31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption
-- (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.) .
32. Relationship to a larger project or series of
projects.
V ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project,
including information on topography, soil stability, plants and
animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe
any existing s.tructures. on the site, and the use of the structures.
Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will
be accepted. SA00 UyC 01jGNAA490.
34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information
on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic
aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial,
ets.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops,
department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height,
frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc. ) . Attach photographs of the
vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted.
*IMII.A& UO -
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above an in the attached exhibits presei,t the data and infer-
mation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my
ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented
are truce and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date 1d- ;Z lip- "7
"gna
For ----
YF.S MAYBE: No
y p. Cxpu• ure of people or prop-•rly [o
geological hazards such as earth-
' quakn�, tandvlides, mudslidFs , ground ✓
tailuro, or :similar hazard.'!
'l. _Air. Will the proposal result in:
I
a. Substantial air emissions or deteri-
oration of ambient air quality?
I b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in
climate, either locally or regionally?
9. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes .in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements, in either
marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates,, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface runoff? —
c. Alterations to the course of flow of
flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water V
in any water body?
I e. Discharge into surface waters or in
any alteration of surface water
quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or v
turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate ✓
of flow of ground waters? _
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the amount,
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as
flooding or tidal waves? _
74
pPF-7A:22
i
„ YES MAYBE id1
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass, r
crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species pi
of plants?
C. Introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or in a barrier
to the normal replenishment of A.)
existing species?
t d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
I S. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles,
( fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, t,
or insects)? --
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of ani-
mals into an area, or result in a -
barrier to the migration or movement
of animals? --
d. Deterioration to existing fish or ✓
wildlife habitat? ---
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise ,
levels? ---
7. Lipht and Glare. Will the proposal produce ✓
new light or glare?
S. Land Vne,. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
75
J
YFS MAYRF MQ
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources?
b. Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve
a risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or v
upset conditions?
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
13. Transportatin/Circulation. Will the i..
proposal resuolt in:
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
b.. Effects on existing parking facilities,
or demand for new parking? ✓
C. Substantial impact upon existing ✓
transportation systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? V
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazardous to
motor vehicles , bicyclists or
p=destrians? ✓
14. Public Snrvice<. Will the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altared governmental services in any of the ✓
foliow;v aroas: _- -- --
76
YES MAYBE NO
a. Fire protection? V
v
b. Police protection? --
• r
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _
e. Maintenance of public facilities, i
including roads? �--
f. other governmental services? v
15. Energy Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of 'substantial amounts of fuel or
energy? ---
b. Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of ti
energy? ---
16. Utilities. will the proposal result in a
need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities.:
a. .Power or natural gas? _
d
b. Communications systems?
c. Water? --=
d. Sewer or septic tanks? y
e. Storm water drainage? �-
f. Solid waste and disposal?
A/
Now • OIL-raft. syl-r". WILL lye
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: 12"VI pup W 1Fr201VlA-
FI J.T&2 , Foe., Pnu TC''-wtf a
a. Creation of any health hazard or OF 44A( IA19 QJ')1K0NA4'FA) '
potential health hazard (excluding ✓
mental health)? —
b. Exposure of people to potential d
health hazards?
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open
n to the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically
offensive site open to public view?
77
I
9 YES MAYBE TO
( 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result
in an impact upon the quality or quantity •✓
i of existing recreational opportunities? _
20. Archeological/Historical. Will the
proposal result in an alteration of a
significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building?
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish
or wildlife population to drop below
self—sustaining levels, threaten' to
eliminate a plant or animal community, 1
reduce the cumber or restrict -the
range.of a rare or endangered plant
or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of ✓ 1
California history or prehistory? i
1
b. Does the project have the potential to ^
( achieve short—term, to the disadvantage
of long—term, environmental goals? (A
short—term impact on the environment is
one which occurs in a relatively brief
definitive period of time while long—
term impacts will endure well into the
future.)
c. Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu—
latively considerable? (A project
may impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on each
resource is relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is
significant.) v
d. Does the project have environmental
. effects which will cause substantial
ladverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? _
[tI. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation
gN VIf2OMJF'!VT WILL 64 IMp"UB(✓.
1V. Determination
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
78
I
` pPt-2A:2b
is
On the hnsis of this initial evaluation: .
NOT
ave a
[J onind the that the environmentposed and project a NEGATIVE DDECLA'RATION wil significant be prepared.
[] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will
be prepared.
[� I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required-.
I
Date Signature
For
II
(Note: This is only a suggested form. Public agencies are free to devise
their awn format for initial studies.)
r
r
r
a .
79 /