Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTPO011 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 21st day of April , 1981 , by and between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH , a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" , and MOHLE , PERRY & ASSOCIATES herein- after referred to as "CONSULTANT" . W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS , CITY desires to have the CONSULTANT prepare a Traffic Study for a proposed forty-two thousand square foot office building project in the City of Newport Beach . WHEREAS , CONSULTANT desires to prepare said Traffic Study . NOW , THEREFORE , in consideration of the foregoing , the parties here- to agree as follows : 1 . GENERAL CONSULTANT agrees to prepare a Traffic Study on the proposed project in the City of Newport Beach in accordance with the requirements setforth in paragraph 3 of this Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this document. 2. SCOPE OF WORK The subject Traffic Study will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the City Traffic Engineer for the preparation of such studies , in accordance with Chapter 15 . 40 of the Municipal Code of the City, and City Council Policy S-1 . 3. BILLING AND PAYMENT CONSULTANT shall be paid under this Agreement on a time and material basis . In no event shall the maximum amount of this Agreement exceed Eight Hundred and Fifty Dollars , ($850.00) . Partial payments shall be made by the CITY to CONSULTANT upon CONSULTANT ' S presentation of state- ments verifying the time and material costs incurred by it in connection with this Agreement. - 1 - f _* 0 4. .FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE CONSULTANT shall use diligent efforts to complete the provisions within thirty ( 30) days after execution of this Agreement. This subject Traffic Study must meet the approval of the Environmental Coordinator and Traffic Engineer of the City. 5 . TERMINATION This Agreement is subject to termination by the City at any time upon serving written notice to CONSULTANT . The CITY shall be thereafter liable to CONSULTANT only for fees and costs incurred as of the date CONSULTANT receives such notice of termination . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have entered into this Agree- ment as of the date and year first above written . APPROVED AS TO FORM CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH r B As istant it Attorney i ector, Ining Department CITY By Mdh].e`, & As`sdciates CONSULTANT i TRAFFIC STUDY APPLICATION p CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT 5T� 7SocrAT'�5 qq PHONE 9�-D70D MAILING ADDRESS I2og WArZN� �rA'rtTr�1 �-4NA , 'M1 PROPERTY OWNER ��' � CoM�Pc�I PHONE MAILING ADDRESS ADDRESS OR LOCATION OF PROJECT .3,�- '7 37 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: �pf tVIF/2,Sio-nl QT-- i1L�i - �n[ntr>iS� �3TTLUC."fl1ZTr t"�-rzc��y. z4,coo -b -42�jooa Sg ,ET DEVE OPMENT PHASING: I t9 Sz mot'IDS Z rr � 19 8Z ? Beginning Construction Complietion Project Im tial Occupancy Total Occupancy Month/Year Month/Year Month/Year Month/Year MITIG/ATION MEASURES: ISTN ✓??ajr ZhGfGtc57-/'/a/t UcSL' ?d hG dL'MO�idh� ' Do Not Complete Application Below This Line Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No. City Traffic Engineer Approval Date Planning Commission Action Date City Council Action Date 4-7;, S-Cq cks - PRINCIPALS R. HENRY AWEDWARD A.O HLE INC. PERRY, P.E. MUNICIPAL AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS May 27, 1981 Mr. Fred Talarico Environmental Coordinator and Project Planner Community Development Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Dear Fred: Here is the 9% Analysis" for the proposed 42,000 square foot office development at 3737 Birch Street, known as the "Birch Street Associates" project. Please give me a call if you have any questions. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity of participating in this study. Respectfully submitted, MPA, INC. R. Henry Moh e Senior Vice President RHM:jh Attachment 2565 E.Chapman Ave.,Suite 124, Fullerton,CA 92631 • (714) 738.3471 "1% ANALYSIS" FOR "BIRCH STREET ASSOCIATES" CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MAY 1981 MOHLE, PERRY & ASSOCIATES 2565 East Chapman Avenue, Suite 124 Fullerton, California 92631 714/738-3471 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 TRAFFIC GENERATION 4 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT 6 CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS ANALYZED B ANALYSIS 10 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 - TRIP GENERATION RATES 4 TABLE 2 - TRIP GENERATION 5 TABLE 3 - CRITICAL INTERSECTION IDENTIFICATION 9 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION MAP 2 FIGURE 2 - SITE PLAN 3 FIGURE 3 - DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION 7 APPENDIX "A" - 2.5 HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS 1% ANALYSIS" FOR "BIRCH STREET ASSOCIATES" PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a new office building with a maximum of 42,000 square feet of floor area. The existing 13,400 square foot multi- tenant industrial building will be demolished to make room for the pro- posed office building. The project location is 3737 Birch Street as shown on Figure 1 , "Site Location Map." Figure 2, "Site Plan," shows the general configuration of the pro- posed project as submitted by the applicant, Birch Street Associates, 1209 East Warner Avenue, Santa Ana. 1 r_ o sqN Q��Go a �0 IRW n ¢� SITE LOCA7TON 37SZONCNST. mix �Pa Gy e �A FIGURE I SITE LOCATION MAP 2 - 1 / � I 1 J ' �7 I I -INN,- Ell, w lower level ground/roof level a w ,acon "BIRCH STREET ASSOCIATES" SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 3 TRAFFIC GENERATION The traffic generation for the project reflects the fact that in order to construct the proposed 42,000 square foot office building, 13,400 square feet of multi-tenant industrial use will be demolished. Trip generation rates for both office use and industrial use are therefore applicable. The net project traffic generation will reflect the traffic to be generated from a 42,000 square foot office building less the traffic generated by the existing use. The traffic generation factors used are consistent with the rates currently being used by the City's Traffic Engineer for project analyses of this type. Table 1 shows the P.M. trip generation rates for both office and industrial uses. This table shows the 2-1/2 hour peak P.M. period from 3:30 to 6:00 P.M. These rates, based on City studies, are twice the rate for the actual P.M. peak hour. TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION RATES 'RATES LAND USE TIME PERIOD IN OUT Office 3:30 - 6:00 P.M. 1 .20 3.40 Industrial 3:30 - 6:00 P.M. 0.48 1 .94 Using the above traffic generation rates which are in trip ends per 1 ,000 square feet of floor area, the following Table 2 was calculated. 4 This table shows the actual traffic volumes expected from the two land use types as well as the net traffic that will be generated from the site after the existing industrial use is replaced with the proposed office use. TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION 2.5 HOUR PEAK P.M. PEAK HOUR LAND USE IN OUT IN OUT Office 50 143 25 72 (42,000 square feet) Industrial -6 -26 -3 -13 (13,400 square feet) _ _ _ _ Net Project Generation Increase 44 117 22 59 5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT The net project traffic to be generated from the proposed project was directionally distributed and assigned to the street system based on the "Newport Place Traffic Study" by Robert Crommelin and Associates, Inc. , January 1978. Figure 3, "Directional Traffic Distribution," shows the trip distribution that has been used for this study. The distribu- tion is for outbound traffic. Inbound traffic would be the same percent- ages in the opposite direction. Multiplying these percentages by the trips generated, estimates can be made of traffic volumes from the project at various locations. This same distribution was also used for the analysis of a 50,000' square foot office in the same vicinity of this project as covered by the December 23, 1980 report by Weston Pringle and Associates. 6 34 /2'/, Srl,=- LOCA770N 3797 6M ST. s7' 4oi � a o � /s7Lz �vo ` 12 UNN 3% N� cru. RD m Foggy 3q� ✓o - "4 y��GS 3 Co4sr a aC/F!C FIGURE 3 DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION 7 CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS ANALYZED Based on discussions with the City Traffic Engineer, nine intersections as shown on Table 3, "Critical Intersection Identification," were identi- fied for analysis under the Traffic Phasing Ordinance that could be impacted by the project. For this analysis the "N Traffic Volume Analysis" forms from the Traffic Phasing Ordinance were utilized. Appendix "A" contains the data for the individual intersections. The results are summarized in Table 3. The criteria established by the City Council indicates that any inter- section where the project traffic during the 2.5 hour peak exceeds one percent of the existing plus regional growth plus committed project traffic must be analyzed in detail . The specific methodology of this analysis used the December 23, 1980 Weston Pringle and Associates report plus the traffic at the investigated intersections from the Quail Business Center as reported by Herman Kimmel and Associates dated September 19, 1980 and for Far West Savings and Loan as reported by Basmaciyan-Darnell , Inc. dated December 16, 1980. 8 TABLE 3 CRITICAL INTERSECTION IDENTIFICATION "BIRCH STREET ASSOCIATES" 2.5 HOUR PERCENTAGE LOCATION NB SB EB WB 1. Bristol Street North & Campus Drive 0.0 0.0 -- 0.4 2. Bristol Street North & Birch Street 1 .6 2.0 -- 0.1 3. Bristol Street North & Jamboree Road 0.0 0.0 -- 0.2 4. Bristol Street & Campus Drive 0.0 0.1 0.2 -- 5. Bristol Street & Birch Street 0.0 1 .4 0.3 -- 6. Bristol Street & Jamboree Road 0.0 0.0 0.3 -- 7. Jamboree Road & MacArthur Boulevard 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8. Jamboree Road & Campus Drive 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 9. MacArthur Boulevard & Campus Drive 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.0 9 ANALYSIS As shown on Table 3, the intersections of Bristol Street North and Birch Street and Bristol Street and Birch Street have peak period project generated traffic volumes that exceed one percent of the northbound and southbound volumes at the Bristol Street North and Birch Street inter- section and the southbound movement at the Bristol Street and Birch Street intersection. A tabulation of the intersections that have project traffic volumes exceeding the one percent limit is as follows: 2.5 HOUR PERCENTAGE INTERSECTION NB SB EB WB Bristol Street North & Birch Street 1 .6 2.0 -- 0.1 Bristol Street & Birch Street 0.0 1 .4 0.3 -- It is concluded that an "ICU" analysis will be needed at these two locations because the project generated traffic volume exceeds one per- cent of one or more directions at these locations. 10 APPENDIX "A" 2.5 HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS 4 , f' V 1% Traffic Volume of Analysis Intersection Bristol St. (N)/Campus Drive (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1980) t � I IRpproach I Existing Peak 21 Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project !Direction Peak 2k Hour Regional Projects Peak 21y Hour Peak 21S Hour Peak 2! Hour' I Volume Growth Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume ! Volume Volume = i (Northbound t 2644 6 5' 609 13,31S 33 O I 0,0 Southbound ; 3552 e7 805 ' 4444 44- O astbound ` estbound 9636 / 2 / 2 6 4 O I Z41.7 124 So 0.4� D Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ' Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: /`?QI26, l98/ PROJECT: Qjrt�r Sf= flSSCCr.�l�s FOR11, I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Bristol St. M/Brich St. (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1980) Approach 1 Existing Peak 2� Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project iGirection Peak 2y Hour I Regional Projects Peak 2h Hour Peak Ds Hour Peak 211 Hour' I Vol une Growth Peak Ds Hour Volume Volume Volume 1 Volume Volume Northbound j 904 289 1 • iSouthbound 2729 G 95 3424 34 6 S 1 2•oz ,Eastbound estbound 7220 9 Z/ 77 9¢SS 95 ! �•/ (� Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ' Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Mel Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. _ DATE: 2,4 /98/ PROJECT: FOWL I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Bristol St. (N)/Jamboree Road (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1910) IDl rection h Regional! Existing Peak 2h Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project Peak 2 Hour Re ional Projects Peak 2y Hour Peak 2$ Hour Peak 2y Hour' � Volume Growth Peak 2k Hour Yolume Volume Volume i Volume Volume Northbound 6131 9 M 82 74 2 2 74• 1 D.O 1outhbound 3003 ¢ 626 3633 . 3(0 0 Eastbound — 1 •estbound 1600 20 463 2103 2-1 D Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. DATE• PROJECT: (jircl? S �iscri� s FORM I It 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Bristol St./Campus Dr.-Irvine Ave. (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1980) FApproach Existing Peak 2h Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project— �oirectton i Peak 2h Hour Regional Projects Peak 2+1 Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 23$ Hour' .Vol we Growth Peak 2k Hour Volume volume Volume Volume Volume t Northbound 1774_ 25 34.9 2148 21 •4 I � i5outhbound 2808 69 187 3064 31 4 Eastbound I 6581 B 3 ' { 740 B4010 84. ' I8 estbound 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of.Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: 8irc� S� S�iq �c5 F0RIM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Bristol St./Birch Street (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1980) Approach I Existing Peak 2$ Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project ' Mirection Peak 2� Hour Regional Projects Peak 23$ Hour Peak 2)s Hour Peak 211 Hour' Volume Growth Peak 21S Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound I 203 Z(o 9 3 10.0 isouthbound 1098 167 Eastbound 5504 69 951 6524 65 19 0.3Z estbound { Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 23-2 Hour Traffic Volume © Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: 4la M/09 PROJECT: /3�,.�l, <$' A5cc/w711e�S FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Bristol St./Jamboree Road (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1989 Approach Existing Peak 21, Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project Airection ; Peak 2k Hour Regional Projects Peak 24 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 24 Hour' I Volume Growth Peak 2$ Hour Volume Volume Volume i Volume Volume Northbound 5614 8 Z 2 1{0 7838 78 0,02 outhbound 2063 3 40 9 24.75 25 a 1 0.02 • � i5 ; I Eastbound 4862 61 107 9 6002 60 • 1 $ 10,3% I aiestbound ' Q Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. _ / DAT E: /`7a--r PROJECT: dj�cli cS�i �JSoci�s / J FOR14 I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MacArthur Blvd./Jamboree Road (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1980) •Approach Existing Peak 21, Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction i Peak 215 Hour Regional Projects Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2y Hour• 1 - Volume Growth Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume ) Volume Volume (Northbound I 1259 4 62 3 2093 6 21 O Isoucnbound 2887 4 6133 3724. 37 'Eastbound 2340 3 683 30 2(. 30 estbound 2751 10 5769 3330 33 O. o.a� Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE• /yg/ PROJECT: 8/ j S rssoc/a s FORM. I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Jamboree Road/Campus Drive (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1980) Approach Existing Peak 2> Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project .Direction I Peak 2y Hour Regional Projects Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour, I ; Volume Growth Peak 2$ Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Isouthbound 'Northbound 2944 10 1 1 2 2 4076 41 14 t Oat 2773 10 5B7 3370 34. S �•�z Eastbound 2015 4-9 44. 1 2505 25 O Die, estbound 1802 44 83 19 Z 9 19 0. LaiProject Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 21,- Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization •(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. PROJECT: IMPIA 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MacArthur Blvd./Campus Drive (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1980) Approacr h Existing Peak 211 Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project �ltirection i Peak 21, Hour Regional Projects Peak 2�, Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 21,liour' Volume Growth Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volune i Vol me Volume Northbound 2921 4- SIZ 4737 47 35 0•77. outhbound 1 2738 4- 178 3 35 25- 35 13 4.4t Eastbound 2043 50 240 Z333 23 O tq oz estbound 2469 0O 1 279 2808 28 O O.oZ D Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. DATE' PROJECT: Qf`GG7/ STc A30cl"Z-le-s FORM I 3737 ote�_4 fir.= -- - - - - -- --- - - -- -/oM Sea elej - - -- ,ccsulnwr' /,av, dl --- ---- -- - ---- - - - --- - --- ---- - ---------- --- --- --- - --- --- -- --- 1 -e--y -- -- --- - -- - -- -- arG Q' siY �t� T' -- Li7LIk(- - ---- -- - - --- --- ---- -- -- - --- - --- 5� �- - - - F DATE _ -Z TO: [I MAYOR 0 LIBRARY E COUNCIL U MARINE R MANAGER ETPARKS & REC, M ASST, TO MGR, U PERSONNEL * ATTORNEY ,PLANNING *BUILDING 17 POLICE EI CITY CLERK 13 PUBLIC WORKS 0 DATA PROCESS, 11PURCHASING 0 FINANCE LITRAFFIC 0 FIRE A UTILITIES E7 GENERAL SERV, FOR: C) ACTION & DISPOSITION In FILE t INFORMATION tIREVIEW & COMMENT to RETURN REMARKS: FROM: -t �Jo - CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH FINANCE DEPARTMENT JOURNAL NO. JOURNAL VOUCHER DATE April 21, 1981 DESCRIPTION ACCT NBR DEBIT CREDIT CODE 02-700-00 02-300-02 975.00 12 New accBirch 0 - EXPLANATION: To transfer funds taken in error at Community Develonment that chmild hay gone to the Planning Dept. Transaction dated - CODE: G-GENL LEDGER; R-REVENUE; E-EXPENDITURE; C-CAPITAL PROJECTS; P-PRIOR YEARS ENCUMBRANCES r • . s c�r c� s • N�;QPC�Y serc�L crass• ti sr,