Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTPO012 4095 East La Palma Avenue, Suite L Anaheim, California 92807 O� (714) 630-99230 ENGINEERS & PLANNERS J P#q Rib-# �Sg o Gt r August 5, 1981 RECEIVED Planning Cgpartment "`•�'�' �IUG6 1981�- 12 — anon Mr. Fred Talarico NEWPORTEi Cta, Environmental Coordinator G, CALIF, City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 RE: Traffic Phasing Report -- Proposed Office Building 3101 West Coast Highway Dear Fred: Transmitted herewith are three copies of the revised traffic phasing report as referenced above. If you have any questions, please give me a call . Sincerely, GREE CO. Larry E. Greer, P.E. Principal LEG:vp enclosures cc: Mr. Rich Edmonston w/enclosure , or�iskeF� �t €3r>AZrtment AUG6 19mo.CITY OF t2 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. / TRAFFIC PHASING REPORT PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING W N 3101 West Coast Highway, Mariners' Mile Prepared for the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Prepared by GREER & CO., Engineers and Planners a Anaheim, California August 42 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PROJECT DESCRIPTION I TRAFFIC GENERATION 2 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION 4 CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS ANALYZED 6 Committed Projects and Regional Growth 6 APPENDIX PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed office building site is located on the south Side of the Coast Highway between Newport Boulevard and Riverside Avenue. The site is currently used for yacht sales. A total of 28,000 square feet of floor space is proposed. The yacht sales use will. continue and be combined with the proposed office. The site is within the "Mariners' Mile" study area of Newport -Beach. This general study area extends along Coast Highway between Newport Boulevard on the west to approximately 1 ,500 feet east of Tustin Avenue on the east. Most significant access to the study area is from Newport Boulevard, a north/south arterial . Newport Boulevard, State Route 55, connects to several freeways providing access to all of Orange County. Southerly of the Coast Highway, Newport Boulevard enters the Balboa area where the highway becomes Balboa Boulevard and terminates within the peninsular area. - 1 - TRAFFIC GENERATION Daily and p.m. peak hour trip generation rates used for this project analysis are identified in Table 1 . These rates are identical tpp those used in the City of Newport Beach Mariners' Mile Specific Plan.`1) The p.m. peak hour and peak 2.5 hour calculation for. retail uses were derived from the Mariners' Mile plan. Peak hour rates for office use were provided by the City of Newport Beach Traffic Engineering Depart- ment. TABLE 1 . TRIP GENERATION - 28,000 S.F. OFFICE BUILDING P.M. Trips/1 ,000 S.F. Daily Trips Peak Hour Peak 2.5 Hour 1,000 S.F. In Out Total In Out Total Rate 13 0.60 1 .70 2.30 1 .20 3.40 4.60 Trips 364 17 48 65 34 95 129 Source: Newport Beach City Traffic Engineer; Greer & Co., Engineers and Planners (1 )Draft Environmental Impact Report, City of Newport Beach Mariners' Mile Specific Report, prepared by Owen Menard and Associates. - 2 - No adjustment was made for the existing traffic generated by the current yacht sales activity under the assumption that that activity will con- tinue after completion of the office building at much the same level as presently occurs. The proposed office space of 28,000 square feet is expected to produce 364 daily trips. A total of 65 trips during the p.m. peak hour and a total of 129 trips during the p.m. peak 2.5 hour period would be gen- erated. Peak hour total generation figures are combined in and out movements for the proposed office building. - 3 - TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION All trips generated by the proposed office will be distributed directly onto West Coast Highway. Directional traffic distribution on West Coast Highway from the site is assigned 48 percent to the west and 52 percent to the east relative to the site. Figure 1 , Overall Distribution, illus- trates •project traffic distribution using the Mariners' Mile Specific Plan as a guide. The directional splits occurring at Newport Boulevard and at Dover Drive are 'based upon a review of existing traffic volumes and a previous study for the area. 0) (1 )Traffic Phasing Report, Rudy Baron 's Retail/Office Project, 2244 West Coast Highway, Mariners' Mile, Greer & Co., May, 1980. 4 - NORTH �p PROJECT LOCATION ,11� j• -.-_x ays'• 1� m z. 4 6 \ Iy/ 1 6 m \ 37%_r �a� o OVERALL DISTRIBUTION - PROJECT GENERATED TRIPS 6raFIGURE 1 CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS ANALYZED The City of Newport Beach Traffic Engineer identified six intersections for the one percent analysis as follows: 1 . Coast Highway & Riverside Avenue 2. Coast Highway & Dover Drive 3. Coast Highway & Bayside .Drive 4. Coast Highway & Jamboree •Road 5. Coast Highway & Balboa Boulevard/Superior Avenue 6. Newport Boulevard & Hospital Road Committed Projects and Regional Growth Various projects throughout the City have been approved, but ara not yet fully occupied. These have been classified as Committed Projects and are included in this study. Traffic volumes from these projects are included in. the various Appendices. In addition, consideration has been given to traffic increases resulting from development outside the City. Regional growth factors developed by the City have been utilized, and related volumes are included in the various calculations in the Appendices. For this study, the following projects were included as committed: Hughes Aircraft Pacific Mutual Plaza Hoag Hospital 3701 Birch Office - Far West Savings and Loan Newport Place Pacesetter Homes Shokrian 6 - Aeronutronic Ford Bank of Newport Backbay Office Bayside Square Boyle Engineering Sea Island Cal Canadian Bank Baywood Apartments Civic Plaza Harbor Point Homes Corporate Plaza Roger's Gardens Koll Center Newport Seaview Lutheran Plaza Campus/MacArthur Rudy Baron National Education Office Quail Business Center North Ford 441 Newport Center Orchard Office The results of each one percent analysis are summarized in Table 2. TABLE 2. 1% ANALYSIS SUMMARY Project Peak 2.5 Hour Volume Less than 1% of NB SIB EB WB 1982 Peak 2.5 Hour Coast Hwy./Riverside 0 2 49 16 Yes Coast Hwy./Dover Nom. 2 35 11 Yes Coast Hwy./Bayside 2 0 9 28 Yes Coast Hwy./Jamboree 0 3 23 6 Yes Coast Hwy./Balboa- 0 0 9 26 Yes Superior Newport/Hospital 16 5 Nom. Nom. Yes 7 - WORKSHEETS 1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast HWy/Riverside Ave. (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1980) Approach I Existing Peak 211 Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project iDirection Peak 2)s Hour Regional Projects Peak 21* Hour Peak 2$ Hour Peak 24 Hcurl Volume Growth Peak 2$ Hour Volume Volume Volume I -{ I Volume Volume t (Northbound -- I isouthbound I 1106_ 17 76 1199 12 2 (Eastbound 4401 66 512 4979 50 49 westboune I 4082 61 1094 5237 52 16 © Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ' Peak 2Z H'our'Traffic Volume ' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. 28,000 SQ. FT OFFICE 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY DATE: JUNE 1.981 PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Hwy./Dover Drive (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1980) Approach Existing Peak 2h Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction I Peak 2$ Hour Regional Projects Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour' Volume Growth Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume i Volume Volume i Northbound 277 4 4 285 3 0 soutnbounA ; 2487 37 44 2568 26 2 f W'Eastbound 4172 62 442 4676 47 35 i estbound 5251 46 1008 6305 63 11 X❑ ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 24 Hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. i 28,000 SQ. FT OFFICE 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY DATE: JUNE 1981 PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Highway/Bayside Drive (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1980) Approach Existing Peak 2h Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project i0l rection Peak 2)5 Hour Regional Projects Peak 2h Hour Peak 231 Hour Peak 2h Hour? Volume Growth Peak 2's Hour Volume Volume Volume i Volume Volume Northbound 2037 31 0 2068 21 2 _ 1 lSouthbound ; 173 3 0 - 176 - - 2--- - 0 _ (Eastbound 5847 51 464 6362 64 9 iestbound J 4731 41 1050 ' 5822 58 28 O Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity 'Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. . f 28,000 SQ. FT OFFICE, 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY DATE' JUNE 1981 PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Jamboree Road/Coast Hiqhwav (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1980 IIApproach Existing Peak 2k Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project (Direction Peak 2h Hour Regional Projects Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2)s Hour' _ Volume Growth Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume 'INorthbound 1097 3 52 1152 12 0 1 �soutnbound ; 3532 9 898 4439 44 3 Eastbound 4649 40 510 5199 52 23 estbound 4086 91 346 4523 45 6 ❑X Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected " Peak 2, Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than. 1% of Projected Peak 23-2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. ' fJ 28,000 SQ. FT. OFFICE, 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY PATE: JUNE 1981 PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Balboa Ave./Superior Ave @ Coast Hwy. (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winer/Spring 1980) Approaih Existing Peak 231 Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project i Direction Peak 2y Hour Regional Projects Peak 21, Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak '211 Hours Volume Growth Peak 21s Hour. Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume i Northbound 1221 18 8 1247 12 0 I - i • iSouthbound i 2271 34 T6 2321 23 0 (Eastbound I 2857 43 410 3310 33 9 II'iestbound i 3335 50 962 4347 43 26 ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ' Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. r "a ' 1 28,000 SQ. FT. OFFICE, 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY DATF• JUNE 1981 PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Newport Blvd./Hospital Rd. (Existing Traffic "Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1980) Approach Existing Peak 2h Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project �oirection Peak 24 Hour Regional Projects Peak 211 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hourl I Volume Growth Peak 2+ Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume 1Northbound 4055—_ 35 _ 60 4150 42 16 Ilsouthbound 13719 32 34 3785 38 5 Eastbound 1645 14 140 1799 18 0 estbound 1501 15 0 -1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Lij Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. 28,000 SQ. FT OFFICE, 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY DATE: JUNE 1981 PROJECT r *-. 0 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 21st day of April , 1981 , by and between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH , a municipal corporation , hereinafter referred to as "CITY" , and GREER AND COMPANY herein after referred to as "CONSULTANT" . W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS , CITY desires to have the CONSULTANT prepare a Traffic Stt2Y for a proposed Twenty-eight thousand square foot office building project in the City of Newport Beach . WHEREAS , CONSULTANT desires to prepare said Traffic Study. NOW , THEREFORE , in consideration of the foregoing , the parties hereto agree as follows : 1 . GENERAL CONSULTANT agrees to prepare a Traffic Study on the proposed project in the City of Newport Beach in accordance with the requirements setforth in paragraph 3 of this Agreement in accordance with the terms and 'conditions set forth in this document. 2 . SCOPE OF WORK The subject Traffic Study will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the City Traffic Engineer for the preparation of such sttadiies , in accordance with Chapter 15 .40 of the Municipal Code of the City, and City Council Policy S-1 . 3. BILLIN.G AND PAYMENT CONSULTANT shall be paid ! under this Agreement on a time and material basis . In no event shall the maximum amount of this Agreement exceed Four Hundred and Fifty Dollars . ($450 .00) . Partial payments shall be made by the CITY to CONSULTANT upon CONSULT.ANV'S presentation of statements verifying the time and material costs incurred by it in connection with this Agreement. -1 - 4. FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE CONSULTANT shall use diligent efforts to complete the provisions within thirty (30) days after execution of this Agreement. This subject Traffic Study must meet the approval of the Environmental Coordinator and Traffic Engineer of the City. 5 . TERMINATION This Agreement is subject to termination by the City at any time upon serving written notice to CONSULTANT. The CITY shall be thereafter liable to CONSULTANT only for fees and costs incurred as of the date CONSULTANT receives such notice of termination . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into the Agreement as of the date and year first above written . APPROVED AS TO FORM CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH B 1 A 4sistant City Attorney Di c or, PLIanni!ny Department CITY Greer anW Company CONSULTANT ASO TRAFFIC STUDY APPLICATION CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH kj DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNI/THY DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT r N/42 6,-c tLf2 A/FN PHONE(?/y) 7J7-722p MAILING ADDRESS /�,�9 /%r^^ ¢,= /iE ZF I/(/G PROPERTY OWNER IVOIb I&Teg�e-Sr PHONE MAILING ADDRESS �y�7 ADDRESS OR LOCATION OF PROJECT J?IDr PACIFIC CQWt 'i DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: &P2P) -," Opon -t-04- A'Q r-T. CFGjae' �allD/,I/,-, /,o -2—he 54,46 -04e-0E.S zag4<A-lA/e- 60<L DEVELOPMENT PHASING: Beginning Construction_ Completion Project Initial Occupancy Total Occupancy e-1 - 01 l-82 S-1-- 82- //-- /•-0z Month/Year Month/Year Month/Year Month/Year MITIGATION MEASURES: 2eqx , S" 7 &0o 14) 5'4-Ib Lod-. ;( /c T/NC 41 S/£ is �1/9C/fT <'r FU7 L1,4-G� t•G/PS t,4.t9 eC_4 F kcG/ /� SP.2GE � a o O y V I Do Not Complete Application Below This Line u. o h Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No. City Traffic Engineer Approval Date Planning Commission Action Date City Council Action Date LANCER YACHT CORPORATIO DEfgCH qNO RETAIN THIS STATCIAM. TH6/.TiACNSO CNBCK IB IN PAYMEM OF ITCMS D65Cft186O 88LOW. IRVINE, CA 92714 IF NOT CORRCRPL CNOTPY USPA0.111 NOPECEIITDH51A.. DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Traffic Study $575.00 Teo. 3ia� Graat� Hwy • lam 0' /Z5 . --+-�WPD —.«~--- CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RECEIPT �����r pia R dm NEWPORT BEACH. CALIFORNIA 92663 ^ 5 t i No. b i �<lLOPN�Plid L DATE i RECEIVED FROM �T `�'��� FOR: "� •� 31O l.- O /r.L i iACCOUNT NO ACCOUNT NO. i - 0- 00 DEPARTMENT i BY ' 1 i J I OLE COP ' 1)O NOY REMOVE ' TRAFFIC PHASING REPORT PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING 3101 West Coast Highway, Mariners' Mile ' Prepared for the ' CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ' MARCH 15, 1982 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Page 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION I 1 TRAFFIC GENERATION 2 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION 4 1 CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS ANALYZED 6 1 Committed Projects and Regional Growth 6 1 APPENDIX i 1 1 _ 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 ' ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION ' The proposed office building site is located on the south side of the Coast Highway between Newport Boulevard and Riverside Avenue. The site is currently used for yacht sales. A total of 41,500 square feet ' of floor space is proposed. The yacht sales use will continue and be combined with the proposed office. The site is within the "Mariners' Mile" study area of Newport Beach. This general study area extends along Coast Highway between Newport Boulevard on the west to approximately 1 ,500 feet east of Tustin Avenue on the east. Most significant access to the study area is from Newport ' Boulevard, a north/south arterial . Newport Boulevard, State Route 55, connects to several freeways providing access to all of Orange County. Southerly of the Coast Highway, Newport Boulevard enters the Balboa area where the highway becomes Balboa Boulevard and terminates within ' the peninsular area. t I 1 1 ' TRAFFIC GENERATION Daily and p.m. peak hour trip generation rates used for this project analysis are identified in Table 1 . These rates are identical tqq those used in the City of Newport Beach Mariners' Mile Specific Plan. 1) The ' p.m. peak hour and peak 2.5 hour trip generation rates for office uses were provided by the City of Newport Beach Traffic Engineering Depart- ment. TABLE 1 . TRIP GENERATION - 41 ,500 S.F. OFFICE BUILDING ' P.M. Trips/1 ,000 S.F. Daily Trips Peak Hour Peak 2.5 Hour 11000 S.F. In Out Total In Out Total ' Rate 13 0.60 1 .70 2.30 1 .20 3.40 4.60 ' Trips 540 25 71 96 50 142 192 ' Source: Newport Beach City Traffic Engineer; Greer & Co., Engineers and Planners (1 )Draft Environmental Impact Report, City of Newport Beach Mariners' Mile Specific Report, prepared by Owen Menard and Associates. ' - 2 - ' No adjustment was made for the existing traffic generated by the cur- rent yacht sales activity under the assumption that that activity will ' continue after completion of the office building at much the same level as presently occurs. ' The proposed office space of 41,500 square feet is expected •to produce 540 daily trips. A total of 96 trips during the p.m. peak hour and a total of 192 trips during the p.m. peak 2.5 hour period would be generated. Peak hour total generation figures are combined in and out movements for the proposed office building. 1 1 1 1 1 , ' - 3 tTRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION All trips generated by the proposed office will be distributed directly onto West Coast Highway. Directional traffic distribution on West Coast Highway from the site is assigned 48 percent to the west 'and 52 percent to the east relative to the site. Figure 1, Overall Distribution, illus- ' trates project traffic distribution using the Mariners' Mile Specific Plan as a guide. The directional splits occurring at Newport Boulevard and at Dover Drive are based upon r review of existing traffic volumes and a previous study for the area. 0 1 (1 )Traffic Phasing Report, Rudy Baron's Retail/Office Project, 2244 West Coast Highway, Mariners' Mile, Greer & Co., May, 1980. - 4 - 1 � i NORTH PROJECT LOCATION asiirac ,•�• P� ^�� 30 i. lb tl'Rp, �. ti \\ s: 1 7?� \ G i i OVERALL DISTRIBUTION 1 PROJECT GENERATED TRIPS i a FIGURE 1 1 • • I 1 , 1 ' CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS ANALYZED ' The City of Newport Beach Traffic Engineer identified eight intersec- tions for the one percent analysis as follows: 1 . Coast Highway & Orange Street 2. Coast Highway & Prospect Street 3. Coast Highway & Balboa Boulevard/Superior Avenue . 4. Coast Highway & Riverside Avenue ' 5. Coast Highway & Dover Drive 6. Coast Highway & Bayside Drive 7. Coast Highway & Jamboree Road 8. Newport Boulevard & Hospital Road Committed Projects and Regional Growth ' Various projects throughout the City have been approved, but are not yet fully occupied. These have been classified as Committed Projects and are included in this study. Traffic volumes from these projects ' are included in the various Appendices. In addition, consideration has been given to traffic increases resulting from development outside the City. Regional growth factors developed by the City have been ' utilized, and related volumes are included in the various 'calculations in the Appendices. ' For this study, the following projects were included as committed: Hughes Aircraft Sea Island Hoag Hospital Baywood Apartments ' Far West Savings and Loan Harbor Point Homes Pacesetter Homes Roger's Gardens ' - 6 - ' Aeronutronic Ford Seaview Lutheran Plaza Backbay Office Rudy Baron ' Boyle Engineering Quail Business Center Cal Canadian Bank 441 Newport Center Drive Civic Plaza Martha's Vineyard ' Corporate Plaza Valdez - 3101 West Coast Hwy. Koll Center Newport Coast Business Center Campus/MacArthur KolI Center Newport & No. 1 TPP ' National Education Office Amendment No. 1 Ford Aero TPP North Ford Ross Mollard Orchard Office ' The results of each one percent analysis are summarized in Table 2. ' TABLE 2. 1% ANALYSIS SUMMARY Project Peak 2.5 Hour Volume Less than 1% of NB SB EB N'B 1983 Peak 2.5 Hour 1. Coast Highway/ Orange Street 0 0 13 37 Yes 2. Coast Highway/ Prospect Street 0 0 13 37 Yes 3. Coast Highway/ ' Balboa Boulevard/ Superior Avenue 0 0 13 37 No 4. Coast Highway/ Riverside Avenue 0 3 74 23 No ' 5. Coast Highway/ Dover Drive Nom. 3 53 15 No 6. Coast Highway/ Bayside Drive 3 0 43 13 Yes ' 7. Coast Highway/ Jamboree Road 0 4 36 9 No ,8. Newport Boulevard/ Hospital Road 23 7 Nom. Nom. Yes ' Source: Greer & Co., Engineers and Planners. ' The four intersections exceeding the one percent analysis listed in Table 2 above were further examined using the intersection capacity utilization analysis forms. Table 3 identifies the results of ICU analy- sis for three traffic levels -- existing, projected 1983 traffic, and 1983 traffic levels with project traffic added. _ 7 _ ' • TABLE 3. ICU ANALYSIS ' Intersection Existing V/C Projected V/C Project V/C 1 Coast/Superior 1 .2095 1 .2180 1 .2295 Coast/Riverside 0.8591 0.8803 0.8925 ' Coast/Dover 0.8969 0.9034 0.9137 Coast/jamboree 0.8875 0.8925 0.9000 Source: Greer & Co., Engineers and Planners. ' Two intersections exceeded an ICU of 0.90 -- Coast/Superior and Coast/ ' Dover. A further analysis of these two intersections with capacity increasing improvements was conducted. The Coast/Superior intersection ICU was improved to 0.8200 with post-project volumes and the intersec- tion of Coast/Dover ICU was improved to 0.7639 with post-project volumes. Capacity improvements previously identified for Coast/Superior were • ' developed for the Hughes Aircraft Expansion analysis of May, 1981, and are as follows: ' 1 . Add third westbound through lane 2. Southbound improved to two through lanes, two right-turn lanes, and a separate left-turn lane ' Capacity improvements for Coast/Dover were also identified from previ- ous project reports and were provided by the City Traffic Engineer as: ' 1 . Add third westbound and eastbound through lanes 2. Add second eastbound left-turn lane 3. Add westbound free right-turn movement ' The improved ICU's discussed above result from these improvements. 1 _ 8 _ 1 1 i APPENDICES i ' t% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Hi h way.,/Orange Street ' (Existing Traffic Volumes ase onAverage winter/Spring 19 II1 Peak 2� Hour Approved ' Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1" of Projected Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth . Peak 2), Hour Peak 235 Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 537 0 0 537 5 ' 0 northbound 153 0 0 T53 i 0 ' Eastbound 2772 I 8 88 .2868 29 i 13 Westbound 5159 15 48 5222 52 37 ' a Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1%,of Projected • Peak 2 2 Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ' Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. ' 3101 West Coast Highway . DATE: March 15, 1982 ' PROJECT: • FORM'I ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Highway / Prospect Street ' (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter Spring 19 _ Peak 2h Hour Approved ' Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1;• of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h, Hour Growth . Pdak 2� Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2y Hour ' Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume 1 ' Northbound Southbound 260 0 0 260 3 1 0 ' Eastbound 2530 7 i 88 2625 i 26 ! 13 i Westbound, t (_ 4920 _ 48 4982 _ 50 37 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected '. Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected [] Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. 1 t3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY DATE: MARCH 15, 1982 ' PROJECT: FORM•I I ' • ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Hi hwa /Balboa B1 .-Superior Ave. ' (Existing Traffic Volumes-based on Average inter Spring 19 81 Peak 2� Hour Approved ' Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1", of Projected Project Direction Peak 215 Hour - Growth Peak 21, Hour Peak 23a Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2y Hour i Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound . .1823 0 27 1850 . . . 19 I 0 I) 5outhbound -2901 1 0 - ---2951 30 ' Eastbound 3311 10 I 88 3409 i 34 i 13 westbound 3 85 10 14 3509 35 37 , O Project Traffic is estimated to be less than M of Projected . Peak 22 Hour. Traffic Volume ' a Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than. 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (T.C.U. ) 'Analysis is required. 1 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY DATE: MARCH 15, 1982 ' PROJECT: FORM• I INTEROION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANAWS Intersection Coast Highway/Balboa Blvd.-Superior Ave. ' ( Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 1981) EXIST. EXIST. REGIONAL COMMITTED PROJECTED Movenent EXISTING PROPOSED pK.HR. Y/L GROWTH PROJECT Y/C Ratio PROJECT PROJECT ' Lanes Cap. Lanes Cap. Vol. Ratio Volume Volume VW/ool Project volume V/C Ratio Volume NL 2400 421 .1754* .1754* .1754* ' NT 2400 265 •1104 1 .1104 NR 1600 N.SJ 58 -.0363 1 1 .0363 SL 146 1 ST 3200 473 .1934 2 .1941 . SR 1600 708 .4425k 6 .4463* .4463* EL 3200 244 .0763* 4 0775* .0775* ' ET 3200 828 1 .2588 5 5 .2619 13 1 .2659 ER 1600 N:S. 401 .2506 .2506 WL 1600 85 .0531 .0531 WT 3200 1329 .4153* 5 6 .4188* 37 .4303*' WR 1600 N•S• 77 .0481 1 .0481 YELLOWTIME 1000* i .1000* .1000* EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION'[_1 .2095 ' EXISTING PLUS COWITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED INPROYENENTS •I.C.U. .2180 i EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U. 1 .2295 1 ' ❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' ® Projected plus project-traffic I .C.U. will be greater than 0.90 ' ❑ Projected plus project traffic .I.C.U. with systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' Description of system improvement: ' __ 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY DATE: 3/15/82 PROJECT FORM II INTERS@ION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANA*IS Intersection Coast Highway/Balboa Blvd.-Superior Ave. ' ( Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 1981) EAST. EXIST. REGIONAL COMMITTED PROJECTED Movement EXISTING PROPOSED EXIST. XISV/C REGIONWTH PROJECT V/C Ratio PROJECT PROJECT Lanes pp. Lanes Cap. w/o Project Volume Y/C Ratio Vol. Ratio Volume Volume Volume NL 2400 421 .1754* .1754* .1754* NT 2400 265 .1104 1 .1104 NR 1600 N.S 58 .0363 .0363 SL 1600 146 1 .0919 ST 3200 473 .1934 2 .1484* .1484* ' SR 1600 3200 708 .4425* 6 .2625 EL 3200 244 .0763* 4 :0775* .0775* ' ET 3200 828 .2588 5 5 .2619 13 .2659 ER 1600 N.S. 401 .2506 .2506 WL 1600 85 .0531 .0531 WT 3200 4800 1329 .4153* 5 6 .3102* 37 .3187* WR 1600 N•S• 1 77 .0481 1 .0481 '. YELLOWTIME 1000* ..1000* '1 .1000*- EXISTItfG INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1 .2095 I i EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED INPROVEMENTS •I.C.U. 0.8115 i EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U. .8200 I ❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' ❑ Projected plus project-traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 ' ® Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' Description of system improvement: Add third westbound through lane to .Coast Highway. Restripe Superior ' southbound to include two through lanes; two right-turn lanes, one left-turn lane. Per Hughes Aircraft Expansion report - May 1981 . 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY--. - -_ DATE: 3/15/82 PROJECT FORM II ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Highway/Riverside Avenue ' (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter Spring 19 81 ' Peak 2-, Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project • Direction Peak 23� Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2� Hour fj Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 21 0 0 21 __ j 0 11 �I South bound 0 4 1271 13 3 Alli Eastbound ¢2¢8 'I 12 136 4296 i 43 74 ?I ' westbound 3752 _ 1145 3808 38 23 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% .of Projected '. Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than .1% of Projected ' QX Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY DATE: MARCH 15, 1982 ' PROJECT: FORM•I INTERSTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANAOS Intersection Riverside Avepue/Coact Highway ' ( Existing Traffic"Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 19 1) EXIST.' EXIST. REGIONAL COMMITTED PROJECTED Movement ' EXISTING PROPOSED V/C Ratio PROJECT PROJECT Vol. Ratio Volume Volume GROWTH PROJECT Lanes Cap. Lanes Cap. w/o ProJect Volume V/C Ratio Vol. ti Vol une NL 2 ' NT 1600 3 .0044 1 .0044 NR 2, tSL 88 2 ST 1600 5 .0581 5 .0625 ' SR 1600 .2694* 15 .2788* 3 .2806* EL 1600 271 .1694 1 -.1694 9 - .1756 ' ET 3200 1 1491K.4697* 6 2 .4759* 65 .4962* ER 12 12 WL 1600 3200* 9 0256* 0256* WT 4800 1482- 088 5 1 .3100 23 .3148 WR 1600 3,8 .0P38 3 0256 '. YELLOWTIME 1000" ..1000* .1000* ' EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION .8591 EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED •INPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 8803 a EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U. 8924 ' ® Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 • ' ❑ Projected plus project-traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 ' ❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with- systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Description -of system improvement: 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY _ __ DATE: 3/15/82 PROJECT FORM II• • • 1 1 1 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 t ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Hi hwa Dover Drive-Ba shore Drive ' (Existing Traffic Volumes-'gas on verage Inter Spring 19 _ Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 11; of Projected Project ' Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2h, Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour I� Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound �! ' 278 0 0 278 3 1 Southbound 2273 0 2 2275 23 3 • it ' - Eastbound 3401 10 i 38 3449 i 34 53 Westbound 55 55 15 — 5473 10 43 32 . - Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ' Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected FX Peak 212- Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. ' 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY DATE: MARCH 15, 1982 ' PROJECT: FORM•I INTER#1TION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANAIS Inters Dover Dr.- Bayshore Dri Coast Highway ' ( Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 19 81) EXIST EXIST. REGIONAL COMMITTED PROJECTED . EXISTING PROPOSEDap• Lanes V/C Ratio PROJECT PROJECT Movement Lanes C Las Cap. PK.HR. V/C GROWTH PROJECT w/o Protect Volume V/C Ratio ' Vol. Ratio Volume Volume Volume NL 1600 34 .0213 1 .0213 NT 1600 42 .0263* .0263* .0263* NR 1600 30 -.0188 ' SL 3200 786 .'2456* .2456* .2456* ST 1600 80 .0500 SR 1600 131 .0819 1 .0819 3 .0844 EL 1600 87 .0544* 2 .0556* 9 .0612* ' ET 3200' 1 1310 .4094 1 5 13 .4150 43 .4284 ER 1600 30 .0188 1 .0188 WL 1600 38 .0238 ' ► T 3200 1506 .4706* 8 9 .4759* 15 .4806* WR 1600 714 .4463 ' 1 YELLOWiINE .1000* .� .1000* � � .1000* EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION .8969 t I 1 ' EXISTING PLUS COMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED INPROVEMENTS •I.C.U. .9034 EXISTING PLUS C"ITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U. .9137 ' ❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' ® Projected plus project-traffic I .C.U. will be greater than 0.90 ' ❑ Projected plus project traffic .I.C.U. with systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' - - - - - -.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Description of system improvement: _ 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY DATE: 3/15/82 ' PROJECT ----_- - - -__-- FORM II INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' Inters6ion Dover Dr.- Bayshore Dri•Coast Highway ' ( Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 19 81) EXIST. EXIST. REGIONAL COM7ITTED PROJECTED �r�{ t EXISTING PROPOSED pK.HR. V/C GR01RN P0.0JECT V/C Ratio PROJECT PROJECT Lanes Cap. Lanes Cap. Vol. Ratio Volume Volume w/o Project Volume V/C Ratio Volume NL 1600 34 .0213 1 .0213 ' NT 1600 42 .0263* .0263* 0263* NR 1600 30 •.0188 ' SL 3200 786 .2456* .2456* .2456* ST 1600 80 .0500 SR 1600 131 .0819 1 .0819 3 .0844 1 EL 1600 3200 87 .0544* 2 .0327* 9 .0360* ' ET 3200' 4800 1310 1 .4094 5 13 .3074 43 ' .3174 ER 1600 30 .0188 1 .0188 . WL 1600 38 .0238 ' WT 3200 4800 1506 .4706* 8 9 .3525* 15 .3560* WR 1600 FREE RT. 714 .4463 -' YELLOWTIME 1000* i .1000* i .1000* EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION .8969 ' EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED INPROVERENTS •I.C.U. .7571 1i EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U. .7639 1 . ' ❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' ❑ Projected plus project-traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 ' ® Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' Description of system improvement: • Improvements identified from previous projects -- Add 3rd EB abd WB through lanes ' Add 2nd EB left-turn lane Add WB free right turn movement Use 70% capacity improvement factor _ 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY DATE: 3/15/82 ' .PROJECT ----_- - • ___-- FORM II P ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Highway/Bayside Drive ' (Existing Traffic Volumes based on verage inter Spring 19 81 ' Peak 2� Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected la of Projected Project Direction Peak 21, Hour Growth Peak 2+1 Hour Peak 23, Hour Peak 2k Hour j Peak 21s Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume r ' Northbound 1410 0 0 140 14 3 • Sorthbound 136 0 0 136 1 0 i ' Eastbound 5223 9 34 5266 53 43 Westbound j; ' 4312 _ 7 43 4362 44 13 ;• ' 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 21, Hour Traffic Volume ' O Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than. 1% of Projected -. Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.. 1 ' 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY DATE: MARCH 15, 1982 ' PROJECT: I FORM' I ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Hi hwa Jamboree Road ' (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage inter pring 19 81 Peak ur Approved ' Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2, Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 231 Hour I Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 1038 0 0 1038 10 0 s southbound 3405 0 0 3456 35 4 i! ' Eastbound •3493 6 34 1 3533 i 35 1 36 �I Westbound ' 3577 6 43 3626 36 9 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected QX Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. 1 ' ' 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY DATE: MARCH 15, 1982 ' PROJECT: FORM' I ' INTERIVION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANA19S Intersection Coast Highway/Jamboree Road ( Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 19 8v EXIST. EXIST. REGIONAL COMIITTED PROJECTED ' Movement EXISTING PROPOSED lanes Cap. Lanes Cap. PK.HR. V/C GROWTH PROJECT V/C Ratio PROJECT PROJECT Vol. Ratio Volume Volume w/o Project Volume V/C Ratio Volume NL 1600 27 .0169* .0169* .0169*' NT 1 3200 286 NR f89 ' SL 1600 166 .1038 ST 3200 729 .2278* .2278* .2278* ' SR N.S. 630 4 EL 3200 426 3 11 .1366 ' ET 3200 1 959 .2997* 3 13 .3047* 24 - .3122* ER 1600 31 .0194 WL 1600 389 .2431* .2431* .2431* WT 3200 1 1060 .3313 3 9 .3350 9 .3378 WR, N.S. •170 — ' YELLOWTIME 1000* 1000* .1000* EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION L ,8875 ' EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED INPROVEMENTS I.C.U. .8925 EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U. .9000 ' ® Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' ❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 ' ❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Description of system improvement: _ 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY _ DATE: 3/15/82 ' PROJECT FORM II ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection New ort Boulevard/Hospital Road ' (Existing Traffic Volumes base on Average inter Spring 19 81 Peak 2� Hour' Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 14; c Projected Project Direction Peak 2;, Hour Growth Peak 2115 Hour Peak 2), Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 3229 0 39 3268 33 23 :I southbound 3482 0 10 3492 35 i 7 ' Eastbound 1527 0 14 1 1541 I 15 1 Westbound 972 0 2 974 10 I 1 ?! ' O Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume ' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 232 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. 3101 WEST COAST HIGHWAY DATE: MARCH 15, 1982 ' PROJECT: FORM• I 1 co t �o G✓% N � '