HomeMy WebLinkAboutTPO036_KOLL CENTER P-C DIST. TP0036
1 - :` Y OF NEWPORT B&-CH _
COUNCIL MEMBERS MINUTES
\CALtiJ9ROLL y�9 ;�9 Gas May 14, 1984 INDEX
Motion x Motion was made to approve the project GPA 83-1(c)
as recommended by the Planning
Commission; and adopt Resolution No. es 84-39
84-39 approving amendments to the Land
se and Residential Growth Elements of
e Newport Beach General' P1an and
I ac ept the Environmental Document; adopt
ORD NANCE NO. 84-15, being, AN ORDINANCE Ord 84-15
OF T E CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AMENDING
PORTI S OF DISTRICTING MAPS NO. 22 AND
25 SO TO RECLASSIFY PROPERTY
DESCRIB AS TRACT NO. 11018 FROM THE
R-3 (217 DISTRICT TO THE A-P DISTRICT
(PLANNING OMMISSION AMENDMENT N0. 601); CA 601
sustain the action of the Planning
Commission o the Traffic Study for the
Superior Aven @@ Medical Office; sustain
the action of the Planning Commission on
the Certificate f Correction for Tract
No. 11018; sustai the action of the
Planning Commissio on Use Permit No.
3081; and add lands pe screening to
Conditions No. 7 and 5.
Council Member Strauss tated that he
was not going to support the motion. 'He
has no objection to the project, but he
feels it aggravates an alre dy existing
problem in Newport Beach, w1tich is the
under supply of housing compared to the
over supply of jobs and employment. He
further stated he feels that, a zoning
is moved away from residential i to
administrative, professional and
financial, this is an inappropriat
direction for the City to follow, an
made reference to the Housing Element
regarding achieving an appropriate
balance between housing and employment.
Ayes x x x x x x The motion on the floor was voted on and
Noes x carried.
7. Mayor Hart opened the public hearing and Koll CtrNpt
City Council review of: TfkPhsgPln
Amnd#4
KOLL CENTER NEWPORT_JR_FFIC_si IN.��
A7EPISFfE - request to approve
an amendment to the Koll Center Newport
Traffic Phasing Plan ,so as to transfer
space from "Office Site A" to 'Office
Site B;"
AND
PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENT.NO_606 - PCA 606
A request to amend the Koll Center (94)
Newport Planned Community Development
Standards so as to transfer the
undeveloped remaining allowable area for
office, restaurant and retail uses from
"Office Site A" to "Office Site B."
Volume 38 - Page 148
r •
AY OF NEWPORT' ACH
COUNCIL MEMBERS MINUTES
rG r titiF � sy
AP May 14, 1984
ROLL CAL INDEX
Report from the Planning Department, was Koll CtrNpt
presented. TfkPhsgPln
Amnd#4
J. Patrick Allen, Langdon and Wilson
Architects, 4320 Von Barman Avenue,
representing the applicant, Koll Center
{ Newport, addressed the Council and
responded to questions regarding a
minor expansion of the Koll Company
headquarters building and the
development of a two-story office
building to replace the existing Collins
Radio Building. He added that the
replacement building is slightly larger
than the existing building and will
utilize a portion of the transferred
office footage. He indicated that there
are no plans to develop the remaining
restaurant or retail commercial footage
at the present time.
After it was determined that no one else
wished to address the Council, the
public hearing was closed.
Motion x Motion was made to approve the amendment
All Ayes tb the Koll Center�Newport tTTraffic
Phaaing Plate and ado tg et�olu o! Res 84-40
s87i=40_amending the__.�olL'Centel
TT_Q-Community beye p ut� r
as recommended��th_ e�sMann
saio--n�_
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
1. Matt Stone, 6828 Woodcrest P1., Alta Permits/
I Loma, addressed the Council, stating Special
at as a representative of the Pantera Events
ers Club of America, and also on
beh f of the Newporter Invitational
Conco d de Elegance Committee; was
appeal g to the Council to reconsider
denial o the special events permit for
May 20.
City Manager obert Wynn stated that he
was prepared relate the reasons for
the denial, but suggested that
appropriate acti at this time would be
to put this item o as additional
business, since pub c comments
historically are rese ed for nonagenda
items.
Mr. Stone indicated that a had no
objections.
Volume 38 - Page 149
RESOLUTION NO. ZV
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AMENDING THE KOLL CENTER NEWPORT
PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SO AS TO
TRANSFER THE UNDEVELOPED REMAINING ALLOWABLE AREA
FOR OFFICE, RESTAURANT AND RETAIL USES FROM
"OFFICE SITE A" TO "OFFICE SITE B" IN THE PLANNED COMMUNITY
(PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENT NO. 606)
WHEREAS, Section 20.51.045 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code
provides that final amendments to a Planned Community Development Plan must
be approved by- a Resolution of the City Council, setting forth full partic-
ulars of the amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on
April 5, 1984, at which time it considered a certain amendment to the Plan-
ned Community Development Standards for the Koll Center Newport Planned
Community so as to permit the transfer of the remaining allowable area for
office, restaurant, and retail uses from 'Office Site A" to 'Office Site
B", and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing the Planning Commission adopted a
resolution recommending to the City Council that a certain amendment to the
Planned Community Development Plan for the Koll Center Newport Planned
Community Development, as set forth in the Planning Commission Minutes of
the April 5, 1984 meeting, be adopted; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that said amend-
ment to the Planned Community Development Standards for the Koll Center
Newport Planned Community, as set forth in the Planning Commission Minutes
of the April 5, 1984 meeting, is desirable and necessary; and
WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach has conducted a public hearing
on the proposed amendment in accordance with all provisions of the law;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Newport Beach hereby approves the proposed amendment to the Planned
Community Development Standards for the Koll Center Newport Planned
Community Development, as reflected in the Planning Commission Minutes of
the April 5, 1984 meeting.
ADOPTED this day of May, 1984.
i
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
- 2 -
WRL/kk
5/7/84
f
/ • City Council Meng May 14, 1984
Agenda Item No. D-7
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
TO: City Council
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: Koll Center Newport Traffic Phasing Plan Amendment No. 4
pA request . to approve an amendment to the Koll Center Newport
Traffic Phasing Plan so as to transfer space from 'Office Site
1 A" to 'Office Site B";
AND
Planning Commission Amendment No. 606
A request to amend the Koll Center Newport Planned- Community
Development Standards so as to transfer the undeveloped remain-
ing allowable area for office, restaurant and retail uses from
"Office Site All to 'Office Site B."
LOCATION: Office Sites "A" and "B" of the Koll Center Newport Planned
Community involving property located on the easterly and west-
erly sides of Von Karman Avenue between Birch Street and
MacArthur Boulevard.
ZONE: P-C
APPLICANT: Koll Center Newport, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
Application ,
This application is a request to amend the Koll Center Newport Planned Commun-
ity Development Standards so as to transfer the undeveloped remaining allowable
area for office, restaurant and retail uses from 'Office Site A" to 'Office
Site B." The proposal also includes a request to amend the Koll Center Newport
Traffic Phasing Plan in conjunction with said transfer of space. Amendment
procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.84 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
Suggested Action
Hold hearing; close hearing; if desired, approve the amendment to the Koll
Center Newport Traffic Phasing Plan and adopt a resolution amending the Koll
Center Newport Planned Community Development Standards as recommended by the
+ Planning Commission.
Planning Commission Recommendation
At its meeting of April 5, 1984, the Planning Commission voted (6 Ayes, 1
Absent) to approve Amendment No. 4 to the Koll Center Newport Traffic Phasing
Plan with the Findings as follows:
/• '' TO: City Cail - 2. 0
FINDINGS:
1. That the proposed transfer of remaining allowable development from "Office
Site A" to "Office Site B" will not result in any changes to the Findings
and conclusions as established in the previously-approved Traffic Phasing
Plan.
2. That the proposed amendment to the Traffic Phasing Plan is consistent with
the Newport Beach General Plan and the Planned Community Development Plan
for Koll Center Newport.
The Commission also recommended the approval of Amendment No. 606 (6 Ayes, 1
Absent) with the Findings as follows:
FINDINGS:
1. That the proposed transfer of remaining allowable development from "Office
Site A" to "Office Site B" is consistent with the General Plan of the City
of Newport Beach.
2. That the proposed transfer of remaining allowable development will not
result in any significant environmental impacts not previously considered
in the Certified Final EIR.
3. That there are no additional reasonable alternative or mitigation measures
that should be considered in conjunction with the proposed transfer of
remaining allowable development.
Background
At its meeting of April 9, 1984, the City Council called up for review the Koll
Center Traffic Phasing Plan Amendment No. 4 so as to be scheduled for public
hearing with Amendment No. 606.
Attached for the information of the City Council is an excerpt of the Planning
Commission minutes of April 5, 1984 and a copy of the Planning Commission staff
report which describes the applicant's request.
{ Respectfully submitted,
v
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JAMESS D. HEWICKER, Director
.I'�
by w 14e.
WILLIAM R. LAYCOCK
Current Planning AdKinistrator WRL/kk
Attachments for City Council Only:
Excerpt from Planning Commission Minutes of 4/5/84
Planning Commission Staff Report with Attachments,
including revised pages of the Planned Community Regulations
COMMSSU ERS Apr*, 1984 MINUTES
sc
5 ,0
s Newport �py+
a 1 a n 8 O i C' of �Jeach
0
ICU CALL INDEX
6. That a washout area for the restaurant trash con-
tainers be'provided in such a way as to insure
direct drainage into the sewer system and not into
the Bay or the storm drains if required by the
Building Department.
I
7. That a minimum of two on-site parking spaces shall
be provided for the proposed take-out restaurant.
That the two restaurant employees shall park on site
at all times.
9. Th the restaurant facility shall be limited to the
hours f 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daily.
10. That the elopment standards related to circula-
tion, walls, andscaping, utilities, and a portion
of the parking equirements are waived.
11. That the service o ny alcoholic beverages is pro-
hibited unless an ame ed use permit is approved.
12. That the Planning Commissi may add/or modify con-
ditions of approval to this a permit, or recommend
to the City Council the revocat n of this use per-
mit, upon a determination that th operation which is
the subject of this use permit, cau injury, or
is detrimental to the health, safety, ace, moralar
comfort, or general welfare of the commu ty.
A. Koll Center Traffic Phasing Plan Amendment No. 4 Item No. 8
+ (Discussion)
Koll Cntr.
Request to approve an amendment to the Koll Center Newport ffic
Traffic Phasing Plan so as to transfer space from "Office Pha
Site A" to 'Office Site B". nd.
No. 4
AND
B. Amendment No. 606 (Public Hearing) AND
Request to amend the Koll Center Newport Planned Community Amendment
Development Standards so as •to transfer the undeveloped No. 606
remaining allowable area for office, restaurant and retail
uses from 'Office Site All to 'Office Site B". Approved
-14-
COMANSSiOMZ Ap*5, 1984 MINUTES
n o = Cit y of N e M t Beach
LOCATION: Office Sites "A" and "B" of the Koll Center
Newport Planned Community involving
property located on the easterly and
westerly sides of Von Kerman Avenue between
Birch Street and MacArthur Boulevard.
ZONE: P-C
APPLICANT: Koll Center Newport, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as•applicant
The public hearing opened in connection with this item
and there being no one desiring to appear and be heard,
the public hearing was closed.
Motion x Motion was made for approval of Amendment No. 4 to the
Ayes • x x x x x x Koll Center Newport Traffic Phasing Plan, subject to
Absent x the following findings, which MOTION CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
1. That the proposed transfer of remaining allowable
development from 'Office Site A" to 'Office Site B"
will not result in any changes to the findings and
conclusions as established in the previously approved
Traffic Phasing Plan.
2. That the proposed amendment to the Traffic Phasing
Plan is consistent with the Newport Beach General
Plan and the Planned Community Development Plan
for Koll Center Newport.
Motion x Motion was made for approval of Amendment No. 606, sub-
Ayes x x x x I x ject to the following findings, which MOTION CARRIED.
Absent
FINDINGS:
1. That the proposed transfer of remaining allowable
development from 'Office Site A" to 'Office Site
B" is consistent with the General Plan of the City
of Newport Beach.
2. That the proposed transfer of remaining allowable
development will not result in any significant
environmental impacts not previously considered in
the Certified Final EIR.
-15-
COMMISSIONERS Apr*, 1984 • MINUTES
z CL 5 0 C4 ofNeNWt Beach
Roll CALL INDEX
3. That there are no additional reasonable alternative
or mitigation measures that should be considered in
conjunction with the proposed transfer of remaining
allowable development.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Motio x Motion was made to review amendments to the Housing Ele- Adjourned
Ayes x x x x x x ment of the'General Plan at an Adjourned Planning Commis- P.C. Mt .
Absent x sion meeting on April.16, 1984 at 4:00 p.m., which MOTION on 4 16 84
CARRIED.
Commissioner Winburn requested, and received, permission
to be excused from the Planning Commission meetings of
April 16, 1984 and April 19, 1984.
Th a being no further business, the Planning Commission
adjo ned at 8:20 p.m. to an Adjourned Planning Commission
meetin to be held on April 16, 1984 at 4:00 p.m.
James Person, Secretary
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
-16-
3
Planning Commission Meeting April 5, 1984
Agenda Item No. 8
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: A. Koll Center Traffic Phasing Plan Amendment No. 4
(Discussion)
Request to approve an amendment to the Koll Center
` Newport Traffic Phasing Plan so as to transfer space
from "Office Site A" to "Office Site B".
AND
B. Amendment No. 606 (Public Hearing)
Request to amend the Koll Center Newport Planned
Community Development Standards so as to transfer the
undeveloped ' remaining allowable area for office,-
restaurant and retail uses from "Office Site A" to
r "Office Site B".
i
LOCATION: Office Sites "A" and "B" of the Koll Center Newport
Planned Community involving property located on the
easterly and westerly sides of, Von Karman Avenue
between Birch Street and MacArthur Boulevard.
ZONE: P-C
APPLICANT: Koll Center Newport, Newport Beach
1 OWNER: Same as applicant
r
Application
This application is a request to amend the Koll Center Newport Planned
Community Development Standards so as to transfer the undeveloped
remaining allowable area for office, restaurant and retail uses from
"Office Site A" to "Office Site B". The proposal also includes a
request to amend the Koll Center Newport Traffic Phasing Plan in
conjunction with said transfer of space. Amendment procedures are set
forth in Chapter 20.84 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
TO: Planno Commission -2. •
I
Environmental Significance
Staff has reviewed the proposed project, and has determined that all
significant environmental concerns for the proposed project have been
addressed in ,a previously certified environmental document, and that
there are no additional reasonable alternative or mitigation measures
that should be considered in conjunction with said project.
Conformance with the General Plan
( � "Office Site B" of the Koll Center Newport Planned Community is
designated as "Administrative Professional and Financial Commercial"
on the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The office, restaurant
and retail commercial uses involved in the transfer of remaining
allowable development, are permitted uses within said designation.
Analysis
As indicated in the attached letter from the applicant, the proposed
transfer of remaining allowable development area from 'Office Site A"
to "Office Site B" involves 10,198 sq.ft. of office area, 5,000 sq.ft.
of (gross) restaurant area and 10,000 sq.ft. of retail commercial
area.
The primary purpose of the transfer is to accommodate a minor
expansion of • the Koll Company headquarters building and the
development of a two story office building to replace the existing
Collins Radio 502 Building located between the Koll Center Newport
leasing pavillion and the Koto Restaurant (see the attached vicinity
map) . It should also be noted that the Planning Commission, at its
March 8, 1984 meeting approved Resubdivision No. 772 which established
the building site for the new office building. The replacement
building is slightly larger than the existing building and will
utilize a portion of the transferred office footage. The applicant
has also indicated that there are no plans to develop the remaining
restaurant or retail commercial footage at this time.
Traffic Phasing Plan
Inasmuch as the Traffic Phasing Plan for Koll Center Newport Planned
Community establishes allowable development in accordance with the
development sites as identified within the Planned Community Text, it
is necessary to amend the Traffic Phasing Plan when transferring
allowable building area from one site to another.
In order to address the possible effect of the proposed development
transfer on the surrounding circulation system, the applicant has
submitted an analysis by Weston Pringle and Associates, Traffic and
Transportation Engineers (copy attached) . The analysis indicates that
the proposed transfer would not result in any changes to the previous
findings and conclusions stated in the approved traffic phasing plan,
inasmuch as 'Office Site A" and "Office Site B" were treated as a
single site for the purposes of that study. The City Traffic Engineer
concurs with this position.
. J
To: Pla&g Commission -3. •
Specific Findings and Recommendations
Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 4 to the Koll Center
Newport Traffic Phasing Plan and Amendment No. 606, and suggests that
the Planning Commission take such action, subject to the Findings and
Conditions as outlined in the attached Exhibit "A".
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director
By fir. �lJ
W.William Ward rife,
Senior Planner
WWW:kln
Attachments: Exhibit "A"
Vicinity Map
Letter from applicant with attachment
Amended pages to the Koll Center
Newport P-C Regulations
4V
TO: Plania Commission -4. •
EXHIBIT "A"
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF
AMENDMENT NO. 4 to the KOLL CENTER NEWPORT
TRAFFIC PHASING PLAN and
AMENDMENT NO. 606
Amendment No. 4 to the
Koll Center Newport
Traffic Phasing Plan
IFindings:
1.. That the proposed transfer of remaining allowable
development from 'Office Site A" to "Office Site
B" will not result in any changes to the findings
and conclusions as established in the previously
approved Traffic Phasing Plan.
2. That the proposed amendment to the Traffic Phasing
Plan is consistent with the Newport Beach General
Plan and the Planned Community Development Plan
for Koll Center Newport.
Amendment No. 606
Findings:
1. That the proposed transfer of remaining allowable
development from "Office Site A" to "Office Site
B" is consistent with the General Plan of the City
of Newport Beach.
2. That the proposed transfer of remaining allowable
development will not result in any significant
environmental impacts not previously considered in
the Certified Final EIR.
3. That there are no additional reasonable
alternative or mitigation measures that should be
considered in conjunction with the proposed
transfer of remaining allowable development.
a
a
YrCiTy 1/AP
0
c
S
Q�F/CE
�I
Y ee �m
p0
Y Bui iv lroe�,rao�avEoJ
cv tPAM4 A ru�av
7 VMeA4&�t16 f��46
Langdon&Aon
Architects
Robert E.Langdon Jr.AIA
Emeet C.Wllson Jr.AIA
Hans Mumper ALA
4320 Von Kerman Ave".P.O.Box 2440
Newport Beach,CaWomla 92660.7M/633.9193 '
March 9, 1984
I
Mr. James Hewicker
Director of Planning
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92663
Reference: Koll Center Newport P.C. Text Amendment No. 15
Dear Jim:
Enclosed is an application and supporting data for a P.C. Text Amendment to the
Koll Center Newport Planned Community Development Standards.
The proposed amendment is minor in nature and consists of transferring the
remaining undeveloped allowable building area from Professional and Business
Office Site 'A' to Professional and Business Office Site 'B' . The remaining
allowable proposed for transfer is as follows:
10,198 square feet Office
5,000 square feet Restaurant Floating Restaurant Site 2)
10,000 square feet Retail Floating Retail Site 1)
This 'remaining allowable area was included in the approved Traffic Phasing Plan
for the Koll/Aetna awned portions of Koll Center Newport and therefore is ade-
quately covered by an approved EIR. The attached letter from Wes Pringle indi-
cates that transferring the footage from the west side of Von Karman to the east
side of Von Karman will not materially afffect traffic patterns.
i
The primary purpose of the transfer is to accommodate (1) a minor expansion of
the Koll Company Headquarters Building and (2) the development of a two-story
office building to replace the existing Collins Radio 502 building located be-
tween the KCN Leasing Pavillion and Koto Restaurant. This replacement building
is slightly. larger than the existing building and will utilize a portion of the
transferred office footage. There are no plans to develop the remaining
restaurant or retail footage at this time; however, the size of office Site 'B'
and its current parking surplus can easily accommodate development of this
footage within the original intent and limitations of the Koll Center Newport
P.C. Text.
0
Langdon&Wilson
Architects
Mr. James Hewicker March 9, 1984
City of Newport Beach Page Two
We have identified this proposed amendment as number 15 based on our belief that
number 14 was an amendment affecting Retail and Service Site 1. Since we were
not involved with this amendment our P.C. Text originals do not include this .
change. We would be happy to bring the originals up to date and provide you
with copies if we could obtain a copy of the approved amendment.
tPlease do not hesitate to call if you or our staff have an I y y y questions, require
additional information or if we can be of assistance with your staff report
preparation.
Sincerely,
J. Patrick Allen
Associate Partner .
wsr/7242-191
cc wo/enc.: Bill Laycock
cc w/enc. Steve Meixner
Alan Tuntland
Wes Pringle
f
r
+r.
�4
TRAFFIC R TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
March 8, 1984
Mr. Pat Allen
Langdon b Wilson Architects
PO Box 244b
N port Beach, CA 92660
Dear Mr, Allen:
In response to your request we have examined the traffic impact implications
of transferring planned land use assignments from Block A to Block B in Koll
Center Newport. This examination was based upon information provided by
you and previous studies of Koll Center'Newport.
At present, an additional 10,198 square feet of office use, 5,000 square feet
of restaurant use and 1�0,000 square feet of retail use are permitted in Block
A of Koll Center Newport. Block A is bounded by MacArthur Boulevard, Birch
Street and Von Karman Avenue. It is proposed to transfer these uses to Block '
B of Koll Center Newport which is bounded by MacArthur Boulevard, Von Kaman
Avenue, Birch Street and Jamboree Road.
A traffic study was completed and summarized in a report dated August 13, 1980,
which addressed the traffic factors related to the development of the remaining
portions of Koll Center Blocks A and B. This study was completed to satisfy
the requirements of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance of the City of Newport Beach
and was approved by the City. Review of this previous study indicates that
14
the uses to be transferred were included in the study within Block A. It was
also noted that the same trip distribution and assignment procedure was utilized
for both Block A and Block B. In other words, Blocks A and B were treated as
a single site for purposes of that study. On this basis, the transfer of
development from Block A to Block B would not change the previously approved
traffic study.
2651 EAST CHAPMAN AVENUE • SUITE 110 9 FULLERTON. CALIFORNIA 92631 0 (714) 871-2931
The conclusion of the previous paragraph is based upon generalized information.
At present, specific locations within Block B for the transferred uses are
not available. Due to the size of Block B, the location of all or part of
the transferred uses in some locations within Block B could alter the results
of the previous traffic study. Since these transfer uses would generate re-
latively minor traffic as compared to the-entire Koll Center Newport develop-
ment, it is not felt that significant changes in traffic impacts would occur.
Within the accuracy and methodology of the approved traffic study for Koll
Center Newport, the proposed transfer would not result in significant changes
to the previous findings and conclusions.
We trust that this review will be of assistance •to you and The Koll Company
in processing the proposed transfer. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact us.
Respectfully submitted,
WESTON PRINGLE & ASSOCIATES
Weston S. Pri gle, P.E.
Registered Professional Engineer
State of California Numbers C16828 & TR565
WSP:bas
N9374
C
PLANNED COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Koll Center Newport
M E E 7 e D %T _LL1
AGEN'B'd% 9"TEM-------
APPLICATIONM i -
f
B I
i
V •
PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
For Kai Center Newport
Ordinance No. 1449 adopted by the
City of Newport Beach on August 14, 1972.
Original draft May 5, 1972
Amendment No. (1) June 21, 1972
Amendment No. (2) September 7, 1972
Amendment No. (3) July 6, 1973
Amendment No. (4) January 11, 1974
Amendment No. (5) March 22, 1974
Amendment No. (6) April 18, 1975
Amendment No. (7) September 8, 1975
-Amendment No. (8) April 23, 1976
Amendment No. (9) November 5, 1976
i Amendment No. (10) June 26, 1978
Amendment No. (11) August 28, 1978
Anexxlmant No. (12) Amendment 514
Amerrdment No. (13) August 8, 1980
Amendment No. (14)
Amendment No. (15) Proposed March-9, 1984
Note: See Footnotes, Page 45 for description of amendments.
PART II COMMERCIAL
Section 1 . Site Area and Building Area (4) .
Group 1 . PROFESSIONAL•& BUSINESS OFFICES
Acreages shown are net•buildable land area including landscape setbacks
with property lines. (4)
A. Building Sites (4)
Total Acreage Office Acreage
Site A ..... . .... 30.939 acres* .. .. . .. .. . 0.9 9 acres*
' Site B ..... ..... 43.703 acres(11). ..... .. . 43.703acres (11)
Site C ... ....... 18.806 acres(10) .• . .... • 18.806 acres (10)
Site D . .. ...... . 19.673 acres .4 ... ..... 19.673 acres
Site E . .. .. ..... 2.371 acres ..... ..... 2.371 acres
Site F . .. . . . .... 1 .765 acres .... ..... . 1 .765 acres
Site G ..... ... .. 5.317 acres($). .... . .... 5.317 acres (8)
122.574acres(8x10) (11) 122.574acres (8)(10)(1
B. Allowable Building Area
Site A ..... . .. .. 340,002 square feet (15)
Site B . .... . .. . . + 963,849•square feet (13) (15)
Site C .... . . .. .. 674,800 square feet(10)
Site D . .... ... .. 240,149 square feet(8)(13)
Site E ..... ..... 32,500 square feet(4)
Site F . . . .. ... .. 24,300 square feet(4)
Site G 45,000 square feet(8)
2,287,000square feet ... .. 2,287,00Q square feet(8)
C. Statistical Analysis (4)
The following statistics are for information only. Development may
include but shall-not be limited to the following:
Story heights shown are average heights for possible development.
The buildings within each parcel may vary.
Assumed parking criteria:
a. ' One (1) space per 225 square feet of •net building area @ 120
cars per acre for Site C, D, E, F, and G.
b. One (1) space per 300 square feet of net building area @ 120
cars per acre for Site A, B. (11)
* (3) (4) In addition to 17.399 acres of office use, there is 9.54 acres for hotel and motel
and 2.5 acres for restaurants and 1 .5 acres of retail "and service within Office
Site A. Therefore, there are 30.939 acres net within Office Site A.
-13-
0
1 . Site A
Allowable Building Area . ........ . .... . 340,002 square feet (15)
Site Area ............... ......... .... 17.399 acres* (3)(4)
a. Building Height Land Coverage (15)
Two story development . ....... .. 3.96 acres
Three story development .......... 2.60 acres
Four story development . ......... 1.95 acres
Five story development ..... ... . . 1.56 acres
Six story development .......... 1.30 acres
Seven story development .......... 1.11 acres
Eight story development .......... 0.97 acres
Nine story development .......... 0.87 acres
Ten story development ........ .. 0.78 acres
Eleven story development .......... 0.71 acres
Twelve story development .......... 0.65 acres
b. Parking Land Coverage
1133 cars 9.44 acres (11)(15)
c. Landscaped Open Space (4X11x15) Land Coverage
Two story development ........ .. 4.06 acres
Three story development .......... 5.36 acres
Four story development ..... ..... 6.01 acres
Five story development ...... ..0. 6.40 acres
Six story development ... ....... 6.66 acres
Seven story development 6.85 acres
Eight story development .......... 6.99 acres
Nine story development 7.09 acres
Ten story development 0.. .. . ...0 7.18 acres
Eleven story development .......... 7.25 acres
Twelve story development .......... 7.31 acres
2. Site B
Allowable Building Area ............... 963,849 sq. ft. (13X15)
Site Area 43.703 acres (4)01)
a. Building Height Land Coverage (15)
Two story development .......... 11':06' acres
Three story development .......... 7.38 acres
Four story development 0 .. ..:.... 5.53 acres
Five story development .......... 4.43 acres
Six story development 3.69 acres
Seven story development 3.16 acres
Eight story development ... ....... 2.77 acres
Nine story development 0.... ..... 2.46 acres
Ten story development a.... ..... 2.21 acres
Eleven story development 0........0 2.01 acres
Twelve story development .0........ 1.84 acres
-14-
b. Parking • Land Coverage
3213 cars .. . 26.77 acres
• (11) (13)(15)
C. Landscaped Open Space (11) Land Coverage (11) (13)(15)
Two story development . .... .. .5.87 acres
Three story development .. . . 9.55 acres
Four story development ... .. ...11.40 acres
.Five story development . .......12.50 acres
Six story development . . ......13.24 acres
seven story development . . . ... . 13.77 acres
Eight story development . . ......14.16 acres
Nine story development .... .. ..14.47 acres
Ten story development . . .. . .. 14.72 acres
Eleven story development . . ..o.. 14.92 acres
Twelve story development . . . .. . . 15.09 acres
3. Site C (10)
Allowable Building Area 379.800 sq.feet
Site Area 18.806 acres (4)
a. Building Height Land Coverage
Two story development 4.36 acres
Three story development 2.91 acres
Four story development 2.17 acres
Five story development 1.74 acres
Six story development 1.46 acres
Seven story development 1.25 acres
Eight story development 1.09 acres
Nine story development - 0.96 acres
Ten story development 0.88 acres
Eleven story development 0.79 acres
Twelve story development 0.72
b. Parking Land Coverage
1688 cars 14.07 acres
c. Landscaped Open Space (4) Land Coverage
Two story development 0.38 acres
Three story development 1.83 acres
Four story development 2.57 acres
Five story development 3.00 acres
Six story development 3.28 acres
Seven story development 3.49 acres
I Eight story development 3.65 acres
Nine story development 3.78 acres
Ten story development 3.86 acres
Eleven story development 3.96 acres
Twelve story development 4.02 acres
-15-
_ r
E. Building Height
Maximum building height shall not exceed height limits set by the
Federal Aviation Authority for Orange County Airport.
Group IV. SERVICE STATIONS
A. Building Sites (4) (5) (11)
Site 3: 1 .765'acres i
1,765 acres....... ... .. ........ . ..... . 1,765 acres
Service station site 3 shall be located within office site F and shall
not exceed 1 .765 acres in size. Any portion or all of site 3 not
.utilized for service station use shall revert to either professional and
business office use or restaurant use. (4)
Group V. RESTAURANTS - (1) (4)
A. Building Sites
Maximum acreages for Site I and Site 2 shall not exceed 2.5 acres.
Maximum acreage for Site 3: 1 .765 acres. Maximum acreages for
Site 4 and 5 shall,-not exceed 3.0 acres. Maximum acreage for
Site 6 and 7 shall not exceed 2.2 acres. (8)
(The following acreages are for information only.)
Site I . ..... .. .. . 1 .25 acres
Site 2 . .... ...... 1 .25 acres
Site 3 . .. .. .... .. 1 .765 acres
Site 4 ........ ... 1 .50 acres
Site 5 . .... .... .. 1 .50 acres
Site 6 . ... . .... .. 1 .50 acres(8)
Site 7 ........ ... 0.70 acres(8)
i 9�es 9.465 acres
Site 1 located within office site "A". (1) (.3) (15)
Site 3 located within office site "P. (4)
Site 2, 4 and 5 located within office site "B". (4) (15)
Site 6 and 7 located within office site "G". (8)
Any portion or all of the restaurant acreage for site 1,2,4,5,E or 7
not utilized for that purpose shall revert to professional and business
office use. Any portion or all of the restaurant acreage for site 3
not utilized for that purpose shall revert to either professional and
business office use or service station use. (4) (8)
-19-
16
Group VI. RETAIL &SERVICE CENTER
4
A. Building Site (4) (5)
Site 1 . . .. . .... . . 5.026 acres
Site 2 . . .. .. . . .. . 1 .500 acres
6.526 acres .. .. . . ... . .. ..... . . 6.526 acres
u Site 2 shall be located within office site "B" Any portion or all of the
retail and service site 2 acreage not utilized for that purpose shall revert
to professional and business office use. (4) (15)
1
I
E
4
-20.1-
1
i9
(11) Planned Community Text revision August 28, 1978 incorporating the
following changes:
a. Made provision for consideration of additional left turn
ingress from MacArthur Boulevard.
b. Eliminated Service Station Site No. 1 and added the land area
to Professional and Business Office Site B.
c. Revised the parking requirement for office buildings within
Professional and Business Office Sites.
(12) Planned Community Text revision incorporating the following City
Council changes:
a. Established existing, and additional allowable development as
of October 1, 1978.
b. Established the requirement and criteria for phasing plan
approval of development beyond 30% of the additional allowable
development.
(13) Planned Community Text revision incorporating the transfer to
allowable building area from Professional and Business Office
Site "D" to Professional 6 Business Office Site "B".
(14) Planned Community Text revision'
n changing the allowable building area of
Retail and Service enter Site 1.
(15) Proposed Planned Community Text revision incorporating the transfer
of allowable Office, Restaurant and Retail building area from
Professional and Business Office Site "A" to Professional and
Business Office Site "B".
-47-
�zo
' � r t[�(jCr��n' P .?• r '" '`.`••;:,; :_,::f +i;:h: ft+:yy, f i '�� J.d:: :A . a•'�f l�'�'<,.Y.. {, -
-';�`' (y �y is�,�� . y�((f d<.5 , S � ._��;' ..ly'•> ' t`t:,;,'. f ., ''y f+�: .�
+ r�t;`l�n�' •1 !• .1•�{•�f'��.. i'll�' �',r)i:�.\fl.lrj{EbF4 �t� •�•.1h'��:li_^ Y�•���u ?�.i- ..r �`��Y�;
`' i +' ,� _ {'.,�. 1�, iil'<"1:° ti�_S. '�1'n4)J`{( _�,` :i: ! t g��:?,�',:� } i '�:r.\a {J{•1�i '•y•;.'.
IY ,i:a.e.c=J':i� . . '1•. .. .r 1:,�.{41 cy H.,ljs t' d •r�� ,. \ "fk{ ;�+��,`:'.:� '�' . F•" 7:' �,j '� �y '�
u t .. tv:¢ rt<�t� i:.L+h 1 h E''• f':!. ). �.... ••i,':rr.:•+,Nsz':•�.' . y. � . t t, e.
ml ISS•574
44� Its:
\ '
' JL
I;ll
p
✓ � ` 7 �'`h ♦ { :SY.0 x..i)ji.•
,1....1,q.,.,..
LANano
%„n �t• , LAND IIS8
BOLL CENTER NEWPORT
Authorized to Publish Advertisements of all k•including public •
notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County,
California, Number A-6214, dated 29 September, 1961, and
A-24831, dated 11 June, 1963.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Orange Public Nollce Adven,siny coverts
by this anldeva is mi In 7 point
with 10 pica column width
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF i
I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of PUBLIC HEAPING
Notice'Is hereby-given that the
the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen Planning
napliNewor Beach will ld ublc
hearing on the application of Kell
years, and not a party to or interested in the below Center Newport for Amendment
#606 on property located at 4490
entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Von Karmen Avenue.
Request to amend the Kell Center
Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the Newport Planned Community De-
velopment Standards so as to
NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, transfer the undeveloped remaining
allowable area for office,restaurant
printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, and retairusestrom"ohice-sue-A"
to "Office Site B". The proposal
County of Orange, State of California, and that a also Includes a request to amend
Public Hearing the Kell Center Newport Traffic
Notice of g— Phasing Plan
Koll Center for Amend. No. 606 NOTICE It all significant
canIcUtTHE.
GIVEN that all concerns
for the
vlronmenlal concerns for the
r1TTy rlr 117T2T9A(PT $F.Ac" proposetl project have been ad-
dressed.in a previously certified an.
of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete vironmental document,and that the
City of Newport Beach Intends to
copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, use said document for the above
noted project,and further that there
Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, are no additional reasonable
alternative or mitigation measures
Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna that should be considered In con-
junction with said project.Coples of
Beach issues of said newspaper for aAC the previously prepare an-
vlronmental document are avoliatiie
for ection at
consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of the pPlalnninglew Departmeand nt. City of
Newport Beach, 3300 Newport
Boulevard, Newport Beach, Cell
fornla,W663-3884(714)640.2197.
Notice is hereby further given that
Mnreh 23 198 4 said publicfAprilg 98 be t hold on
the 7: day of April the
at the hour
of rube p.m. In the Council
•Chambers of the Newport Beach
City Hell,3300 Newport Boulevard,
198_ Newport Beach,California,at which
,time and place any and all persons ,
Interested may appear and be
,heard-thereon,
198_ . James Person, Secretary, Plan'
ning Commission. City-of Newport
Beach
NOTE:The expense of this notice
198_ Is paid from a filing fee collected i
Jrom fhh ppllcant.
Ry�t)<• ed by The orange Coast
p-r/•':fo,•Match 23,1984
1198_ 1 1603-BA
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Exelcuted on —P4aa23 198 -_1z
at Costa Mesa, Californ' .
�C l.r D 4 Dw
Signature
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
I
Langdon&Vlon
ArChlteCtS
Robert E.Langdon Jr.AIA
Ernest CM11son Jr.ALA
Hans Mumper ALA
4320 Von Karmen Avenue,P.O.Box 2440
Newport Besch,Callfornla 92660.7I4/833.9193
March 9, 1984
Mr. James Hewicker
Director of Planning
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92663
Reference: Koll Center- Newport P.C. Text Amendment No. 15
Dear Jim:
Enclosed is an application and supporting data for a P.C. Text Amendment to the
Koll Center Newport Planned Community Development Standards.
The proposed_ amendment is minor in nature and consists of transferring the
remaining undeveloped allowable building area from Professional and Business
Office Site 'A' to Professional and Business Office Site 'B' . The remaining
allowable proposed for transfer is as follows:
10,198 square feet Office
5,000 square feet Restaurant (Floating Restaurant Site 2)
10,000 square feet Retail (Floating Retail Site 1)
This remaining allowable area was included in the approved Traffic Phasing Plan
for the Koll/Aetna owned portions of Koll Center Newport and therefore is ade-
quately covered by an approved EIR. The attached letter from Wes Pringle indi-
cates that transferring the footage from the west side of Von Karman to the east
side of Von Karman will not materially afffect traffic patterns.
The primary purpose of the transfer is to accommodate (1) a minor expansion of
the Koll Company Headquarters Building and (2) the development of a two-story
office building to replace the existing Collins Radio 502 building located be-
tween the KCN Leasing Pavillion and Koto Restaurant. This replacement building
is slightly larger than the existing building and will utilize a portion of the
transferred office footage. There are no plans to develop the remaining
restaurant or retail footage at this time; however, the size of office Site 'B'
and its current parking surplus can easily accommodate development of this
footage within the original intent and limitations of the Koll Center Newport
P.C. Text.
Langdonmilon
Architects
Mr. James Hewicker March 9, 1984
City of Newport Beach Page Two
We have identified this proposed amendment as number 15 based on our belief that
number 14 was an amendment affecting Retail and Service Site 1. Since we were
not involved with this amendment our P.C. Text originals do not include this
change. We would be happy to bring the originals up to date and provide you
with copies if we could obtain a copy of the approved amendment.
Please do not hesitate to call if you or your staff have any questions, require
additional information or if we can be of assistance with your staff report
preparation.
Sincerely,
J. Patrick Allen
Associate Partner
wsr/7242-191
cc wo/enc.: Bill Laycock
cc w/enc. Steve Meixner
Alan Tuntland
Wes Pringle
A Wow P►c*k ad QooedaW
TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
March 8, 1984
Mr. Pat Allen
Langdon & Wilson Architects
PO Box 2440
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Gear Mr. Allen:
In response to •your request we have examined the traffic impact implications
of transferring planned land use assignments from Block A to Block B in Koll
Center Newport. This examination was based upon information provided by
you and previous studies of Koll Center Newport.
At present, an additional 10,198 square feet of office use, 5,000 square feet
of restaurant use and 10,000 square feet of retail use are permitted in Block
A of Koll Center Newport.' Block A is bounded by MacArthur Boulevard, Birch
Street and Von Kaman Avenue. It is proposed to transfer these uses to Block
B of Koll Center Newport which is bounded by MacArthur Boulevard, Von Kaman
Avenue, Birch Street and Jamboree Road.
A traffic study was completed and summarized in a report dated August 13, 1980,
which addressed the traffic factors related to the development of the remaining
portions of Koll Center Blocks A and B. This study was completed to satisfy
the requirements of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance of the City of Newport Beach
and was approved by the City. Review of this previous study indicates that
the uses to be transferred were- included in the study within Block A. It was
also noted that the same trip distribution and assignment procedure was utilized
for both Block A and Block B. In other words, Blocks A and B were treated as
a' single site for purposes of that study. On this basis, the transfer of
development from Block A to Block B would not change the previously approved
traffic study.
2651 EAST CHAPMAN AVENUE SUITE 110 • FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA 92631 • (714) 871-2931
•, • _2-
F
The conclusion of the previous paragraph is based upon generalized information.
At present, specific locations within Block B for the transferred uses are
not available. Due to the size of Block B, the location of all or part of
the transferred uses in some locations within Block B could alter the results
of the previous traffic study. Since these transfer uses would generate re-
latively minor traffic as compared to the entire Koll Center Newport develop-
ment, it is not felt that significant changes in traffic impacts would occur.
Within the accuracy and methodology of the approved traffic study for Koll
Center Newport, the proposed transfer would not result in significant changes
to the previous findings and conclusions.
We trust that this review will be.of assistance to you and The Koll Company
in processing the proposed transfer. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact us.
Respectfully submitted,
WESTON PRINGLE•& ASSOCIATES
Weston S. Pri gle, P.E. -
Registered Professional Engineer
State of California Numbers C16828 & TR565
WSP:bas
#9374