Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTPO060_PLAZA DE CAFES I II�IIII HII III fllll IIIIIII IIIII MINI III III IlU TPO060 P�. .r4...su..w.YW�w-.m+«�........ul. r r ' TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 1 i r for ' City of Newport Beach ' 3300 Newport Blvd. r Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 r r r r by r Ciq r Noble, Grover k Associates 901 E. Imperial Hishriey Suite A Ie Habra, Califorma 90631 (714) 730-3471 Faa (714) 738-7802 rSeptember 1989 i - 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ' PAGE ' INTRODUCTION 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 STUDY INTERSECTIONS 1 RELATED PROJECTS (COMMITTED PROJECTS) 5 ' REGIONAL GROWTH FACTOR 5 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 5 ' Trip Generation 5 Trip Distribution 7 ' Trip Assignment 7 ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS 7 . ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS 11 MITIGATION MEASURES 11 ' Mitigation Measure I 11 Mitigation Measure II 13 ' SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 13 APPENDICES APPENDIX "A" - Committed Projects List APPENDIX "B" - Regional Growth Factors APPENDIX "C" - Treip Generation Rates APPENDIX "D" - One Percent and ICU Work Sheets ' LIST OF FIGURES PAGE_ FIGURE 1 - LOCATION MAP 2 FIGURE 2 - SITE PLAN 3 ' FIGURE 3 - TRIP DISTRIBUTION - PROJECT 8 FIGURE 4 - PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROJECT 9 LIST OF TABLES ' TABLE 1 - STUDY INTERSECTIONS 4 TABLE 2 - TRIP GENERATION RATES AND PROJECT TRIP ENDS 6 TABLE 3 - STUDY INTERSECTIONS ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY 10 TABLE 4 - STUDY INTERSECTIONS ICU ANALYSIS SUMMARY (1990) 1:2 ' TABLE 5 - ICU ANALYSIS - MITIGATION MEASURE I 14 TABLE 6 - ICU ANALYSIS - MITIGATION MEASURE II 15 1 1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this traffic study report is to present the findings of the traffic impact analysis for the development of an office ' building and restaurant on Birch Street in the City of Newport Beach. The development will be constructed in the same plot and is located to the east of MacArthur Boulevard and to the west of ' Jamboree Road. The location of the development is shown in Figure 1, "Location Map. " The location of the office and restaurant in the plot is shown in Figure 2, "Site Plan." ' The office has a gross floor area of 85,300 square feet (SF) and 79,321 SF net. The office is a five story building with each floor having approximately 17,058 SF. The restaurant has a floor area equal to 3,000 SF gross. The total square footage of construction ' equals 88,300 SF. The entrance to the development is on Birch Street as shown in Figure 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS The area surrounding the development is served by a well developed network of roads. The major access roads to the development are ' MacArthur Boulevard, Jamboree Road, Campus Drive, Birch Street and Von Kerman Avenue as shown in Figure 1. The intersection of Birch Street and Von Karman Avenue is unsignalized. The nearest ' signalized intersections are Birch Street and MacArthur Boulevard to the west and Birch Street and Jamboree Road to the east of the development. Due to the various land uses such as commercial, offices, restaurants, etc. in the vicinity of the development, traffic on all the major access roads to the development range from moderate to large volumes. Also, most of the intersections are signalized. This study analyzes some of these intersections which are recom- mended by the City Traffic Engineer. ' STUDY INTERSECTIONS The City-recommended study intersections are shown in Figure 1 and ' listed in Table 1. These intersections are analyzed for both a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes according to the City of Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance and methodology. Each of the study intersections in Table 1 are signalized and are analyzed for the ' following three conditions for the peak periods: 1. Existing volumes 2. Existing plus growth factor plus committed project volumes 3. Cumulative traffic � 1 1 1 ' 73 O� Ift HE 9� CREEK CHANNEL ��EGO ' -s Q�fi NEWPORT IRVINE BEACH 73 ' BISgy AVE = STUDY ' INTERSEC110NS �s LOCATION MAP FIGURE 1 ' 2 EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURES i PARKING STRUCTURES I 25 SURFACE STRUCTURES I I I W > W ON 5 STORY D TYP. FLOOR d U 14,050 S F. I I m ; U 1 1 O RE3STAURANTSF.,000 Lo VON KARMAN AVENUE BUILDING DATA OFFICE - 85,300 S.F. GROSS 79,321 S.F. NET(CITY) RESTAURANT- 3,000 S.F. OF GROSS PARKING DATA OFFICE - 4.4/10DO.OF NET= 353 CARS QRESTAURANT- S/IOOD OF GROSS= 15 CARS SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 efl ' TABLE 1: STUDY INTERSECTIONS ' 1.MACARTHUR BL/CAMPUS DR 2.JAMBOREE RD/CAMPUS DR ' 3.MACARTHUR BL/BIRCH ST 4.JAMBOREE RD/BIRCH ST ' S.JAMBOREE RD/MACARTHUR BL 6.BRISTOL ST N/CAMPUS DR ' 7.BRISTOL ST N/BIRCH ST 8.JAMBOREE RD/BRISTOL ST. N ' 9.BRISTOL ST/CAMPUS DR ' 10.BRISTOL ST/BIRCH ST 11.JAMBOREE RD/BRISTOL ST ' 12.JAMBOREE RD/UNIVESITY DR 13.JAMBOREE RD/BISON AV ' 14.MACARTHUR BL/BISON AV 15.JAMBOREE RD/FORD RD ' 16.MACARTHUR BL/FORD RD ' 17.IRVINE AV/MESA DR 4 Intersection capacity utilization ,(ICU) values are determined based ' on the criteria for analysis suggested by the City. The existing levels of service (LOS) at the -study intersections are "C" or better, except at two intersections. RELATED PROJECTS (COMMITTED PROJECTS) The City Traffic Engineer provided a list of the committed projects in the vicinity of the study intersections. Also provided was the . cumulative expected traffic flow from these developments. These projects are all approved by the City for construction and could be ' in various stages of development or completed. The list of committed projects is given in Appendix "A." There are approximately 115 identified developments as related to the study intersections. ' REGIONAL GROWTH FACTOR ' The City provided the annual growth rate along all the major arter- ials as related to the study intersections. These growth rates vary depending on the area of the City under consideration for the study. The growth rates are applied as required and these growth rates ' represent the anticipated increase in traffic volume in the future. The City-supplied regional growth rates are shown in Appendix "B. " The largest growth factor is 5 percent on MacArthur Boulevard between the Coast Highway and Jamboree Road section. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ' The evaluation of traffic conditions one year after opening of the development is required as per the City requirements. This study analyzes the traffic for the year 1990 and includes all necessary steps as recommended by the City methodology for both a.m. and p.m. peak hours. According to the City methodology, it is first required to do what ' is called a "1 Percent Test" for both a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The one percent test and ICU determining criteria are explained in later sections. ' Trig Generation The trip generation rates used in estimating the project traffic are given in Appendix "C. " The trip ends generated by the project for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours are given in Table 2. The project generates a total of 1,820 trip ends (1,220 trip ends per day from office and 600 trip ends per day from restaurant) . The trip genera- tion rates are taken from the I.T.E. Handbook (1) . Also, the 2-1/2 hour peak volumes are given in Table 2. -------------------- ' (1) I.T.E. Handbook, 4th Edition, 1987. ' 5 TABLE 2: TRIP GENERATION RATES AND PROJECT TRIP ENDS TRIP GENERATION RATES ------------------------------------------------------------ A.M* P.M* PEAK HR. PEAK 2-1/2 HR. PEAK HR. PEAK 2-1/2 HR. rn LAND USE UNITS IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT REASTAURANT 1000 S.F 1 .5 2.5 1.25 5 3 12.5 7.5 OFFICE(GENERAL) 2 .4 5 1 .6 1.7 1.5 4.25 PROJECT TRIP ENDS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REASTAURNAT 3000 S.F 3 2 8 4 15 9 38 23 OFFICE.(GENERAL) 85,300 S.F 171 34 427 85 51 145 128 363 ------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL 174 36 435 89 66 154 166 386 ------------------------------------------------------------ *Trip Generation Rates are for every 1000 square feet(KSF) ' Trip Distribution ' The trip distribution of the project generated traffic is shown in Figure 3, "Trip Distribution - Project. " The trip distribution is based on the anticipated routes of potential employees and customers ' to the development and also considers the nature of the surrounding road network. From Figure 3, distribution of traffic to the devel- opment is as follows considering the complete study intersection area: o Northbound - 45% o Southbound - 35% ' o Eastbound - 10% o Westbound 10% Total 100% At the entrance/exit the trip distribution is as follows: Entrance Exit ' o Eastbound - 55% o Eastbound - 60% o Westbound - 45% o Westbound - 40% Total 100% Total 100% , ' Traffic Assignment Trip assignment involves determining the exact amount of traffic ' that will use the road network based on the trip distribution assumed earlier. The result of the trip assignment process is to determine the total project generated trips during the peak hour by turning movement and direction at each study intersection. The project generated traffic assignments in the a.m. and p.m, peak hours are shown in Figure 4, "Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Project. " ' ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS ' In this analysis one percent of the 2-1/2 hour peak a.m. and p.m. traffic volumes (existing volume plus regional growth factor volume plus committed project volume) are utilized to determine if the project's corresponding 2-1/2 hour peak volume exceeds or is less ' than the above volume for all directions of flow at the study inter- sections. In case the project volume DOES NOT EXCEED one percent of the exist- ing plus regional growth factor volume plus committed project vol- ume. There is no need to do the ICU analysis. But, on the other hand, if the project volume EXCEEDS, an ICU analysis has to be car-' t ried out. The results of the one percent test are shown in Table 3. The work sheets of this test are given in Appendix "D" for all the study intersections. ' From Table 3 it is observed that 10 of the 17 study intersections do not generate more than one percent of the peak 2-1/2 hour volume. For these 10 study intersections no further analysis is required'. ' 7 ' 20% ,25% 2Dz 15x ' 5% 60X 1DX 15% 207 /2051� � SS,fI/40% 7 5% 45% ' 5x 10%//� /25x 21% �OX 5 73 OQ' lOX 5% Sx 5% 5R ,�. 5% 10% �f 10% � lox lox 10%lox 1sx 5%5x �,� s, 41 Sl 10% 5xr 1 NNE R 6qi f � sl4 1 X / 1jFy+ 10% sro� sl 5%/ 10%/ '15 �15% 15% / sr 15 \ 15%/ / J' 5% /10% ` �15% ' CREEK CHANNEL ` �1EG0 ' s 15% UN� Q ' NEWPORT 1159 IRVINE BEACH 73 159/ lsxl Is , AVE. 15% �15x = STUDY INTERSECTIONS 15%/ z` /15% eo ' 15% TRIP DISTRIBUTION - PROJECT FIGURE 3 ' 8 7 31 9/3 R 35/13 ' /23 9/J3/ �. 4/15 5/23 5/13 7/ 9j 31 a / a 2%� \ X 5 � lS� 9/3 44/17 9 3 73 OP tY� 17 7F/?��7/7 9/ N ' 9/3 9/3 4/15 �f4/15 2/8/ �n � 4/15 4/1 \/ 7 ,26/10 2/ice 1 NNE P�` 'P 4• S Sr 1I B 415 IFS 4/15/ Hiyro� J} 2/8 9/3 90 4/15, �26/10 5/2 26/ � 5/23 26 10 17/7 ` 26/10 CREEK CHANNEL d p\6p0 SP 5/23I Pg5\ ' NEWPORT �26/10 IRVINE BEACH 73 t5/23/ 5/23I -�--- s AVE 26/10 126/10 ' m � � = STUDY INTERSECTIONS 5/2.3 XX _ AM I P,, 5/231 YY PM /r 6/10 Rq 26/10 PEAK HOUR\ FIGURE 4 TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROJECT III , 9 ' TABLE 3:STUDY INTERSECTIONS ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DOES PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATE MORE THAN 1% OF PEAK 2 1/2 HOUR VOLUME STUDY INTERSECTIONS A.M P.M ----------- --------- - - --- - -- 1.MACARTHUR BL/CAMPUS DR YES YES ' 2.JAMBOREE RD/CAMPUS DR NO NO 3.MACARTHUR BL/BIRCH ST YES YES ' 4.JAMBOREE RD/BIRCH ST YES YES 5.JAMBOREE RD/MACARTHUR BL YES YES ' 6.BRISTOL ST N/CAMPUS DR NO NO 7.BRISTOL ST N/BIRCH ST YES YES ' 8.JAMBOREE RD/BRISTOL ST. N NO NO 9.BRISTOL ST/CAMPUS DR NO NO lO.BRISTOL ST/BIRCH ST YES YES ll.JAMBOREE RD/BRISTOL ST NO NO 12.JAMBOREE RD/UNIVESITY DR YES NO ' 13.JAMBOREE RD/BISON AV NO NO 14.MACARTHUR BL/BISON AV NO NO ' 15.JAMBOREE RD/FORD RD NO NO ' 16.MACARTHUR BL/FORD RD NO NO 17.IRVINE AV/MESA DR NO NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 10 I ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' As mentioned in the above section, seven of the intersections do generate more than one percent of the peak 2-1/2 hour volume. Thus, an ICU analysis is required as recommended by the City methodology. ' The ICU analysis requires that ICU values at the study intersections be determined for existing conditions, 1990 base conditions (exist- ing plus regional growth volume plus committed projects volume) and ' cumulative volume (1990 base conditions plus project volume) . The results of the ICU analysis are given in Table 4. The intersections which do not require an ICU analysis are identified in Table 4 by an ' asterisk (*) . The ICU analysis results at the study intersections in Table 4 reveal that the project traffic does not alter the ICU values before ' the addition of project volume, except at the intersection of Bristol Street and Birch Street (Intersection #10 in Table 4) in the a.m. peak hour only. For the other six intersections analyzed for ' ICU values, the base volume ICU remains unchanged as listed. The change in ICU value at the intersection of Bristol Street and Birch Street from the 1990 base volume to the addition of project ' volume (cumulative traffic volume) is +0.03; i.e. , 1.20 to 1.23 in the a.m. period only. The LOS remains the same for the a.m. period at "F. " The p.m. ICU value is 0.74 for the cumulative traffic at this intersection. MITIGATION MEASURES ' The traffic generated from the project has traffic impact at the intersection of Bristol Street and Birch Street in the a.m. peak hour only. Even though the LOS remains unchanged, the actual ICU value changes from 1.20 to 1.23. In the case of the other 16 inter- sections, the ICU values remain below 0.9 or no change in ICU value occurs for both a.m. and p.m. conditions. ' The existing ICU at the Bristol Street and Birch Street intersection is 0.97 with the eastbound left turn traffic contributing a higher percentage of 0.58 (929/1,600) . That means the LOS at this intersection for the existing traffic is "E" and that the eastbound ' left turn is operating at capacity. The ICU value with the base year 1990 traffic volume (existing plus growth factor plus committed traffic) is 1.20 or an LOS "F. " The addition of project traffic increases the ICU value to 1.23, keeping the LOS at "F. " The lower LOS is in particular caused by the eastbound left turds. It is to be noted that Bristol Street is a one-way street and the traffic flow is in the eastbound direction. There is no opposing traffic, ' Mitigation Measure I The eastbound left turn lane for the existing volume is already at capacity. The LOS can be improved by adding an additional left turn lane, thereby increasing the left turn capacity from 1,600 to 2720 [1600 + 1600 (0.7) ] . 11 TABLE 4:STUDY INTERSECTIONS ICU ANALYSIS SUMMARY(1990) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXISTING EX.+GR.FAC.+REL. PR. CU14MULATM STUDY INTERSECTIONS A.M P.M A.M P.M A.M P.M ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I.MACARTHUR BL/CAMPUS DR .54 .63 .72 .73 .72 .73 2.JAMBOREE RD/CAMPUS DR * .77 .76 3.MACARTHUR BL/BIRCH ST .45 .6 .56 .73 .56 .73 4.JAMBOREE RD/BIRCH ST .53 .46 .74 .58 .75 .59 S.JAMSOREE RD/MACARTHUR BL .49 .59 .72 .8 .73 .8 6.BRIST0L ST N/CAMPUS DR * .82 1.07 7.BRISTOL ST N/BIRCH ST .7 .84 .87 1.07 .89 1.07 &JAMBOREE RD/BRISTOL ST. N * .9 .86 9.BRISTOL ST/CAMPUS DR * .79 .73 r N tO.BRISTOL ST/BIRCH ST .97 .56 1.2 .73 1.23 .74 11.JAMBOREE RD/BRISTOL ST * .82 .64 12.JAMBOREE RD/UNIVESITY DR .69 .8 .8 .81 13.JAMBOREE RD/BISON AV * .62 .58 14.MACARTHUR BL/BISON AV * 1 .65 15.JAMB0REE RD/FORD RD * .77 .77 16.MACARTHUR BL/FORD RD * .86 .68 17.IRVINE AV/MESA DR " .94 .94 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * AT THESE INTERSECTIONS THE PORJECT TRAFFIC DOES NOT GENERATE MORE THAN 1% OF PEAK 2 1/2 HOUR VOLUME. EX. - EXISTING VOLUME, GR. FAC. - REGIONAL GROWTH FACTOR, REL. PR. - RELATED PROJECT(COMITTED), CUMMILATIVE - CUMMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUME(EXISITING + GR. FAC + REL. PR. + PROJECT) Assuming there are two left turn lanes, for the base year 1990 the cumulative traffic it is 0.83. That is, with the addition of a left turn lane, the LOS improves from "F" to "D" (ICU 1.23 to 0.90) . The ' results of Mitigation Measure I are shown in Table 5. Mitigation Measure II The eastbound left turn can be allowed to share the through and thus increase the left turn lane capacity from 1,600 to 2160 [1600 + 800 (0.7) ] , but this measure will reduce the existing combined lane ' capacity of through and right turn from 3,200 to 3760 [3200 + 800 (0.7)] . In this case, the cumulative ICU value with the proposed change will be 1.02, an improvement from 1.23 to 1.02. The results of the mitigation measures are shown in Table 6. ' It is to be noted that all calculations of ICU values for the east- bound traffic in Tables 5 and 6 are based on proposed lane capaci- ties. It is recommended that due to the high volume of eastbound left traffic, it is suitable to add an additional lane and improve the LOS to "D" as indicated under Mitigation Measure I in Table 5. ' In the case of Mitigation Measure II, it only reduced the ICU value from 1.23 to 1.02, but does not improve the overall LOS. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ' o The project consists of an office building and restaurant for a total area of 88,300 SF. ' o The project generates approximately 1,820 trip ends per day with 1,220 trip ends from office and 600 trip ends from restaurant. o The a.m. peak hour in and out traffic volume from the project will be 174 and 36, respectively. The p.m. peak ' hour in and out traffic volume from the project will be 66 and 154, respectively. o A total of 17 intersections were analyzed. ' o The one percent test indicated that at 10 of the study intersections the project generated traffic satisfies the ' test. o Seven intersections were analyzed for ICU values as per City methodology. Except for the Bristol Street and Birch Street ' intersection, all other intersections are not impacted for the cumulative traffic condition. ' o Under the mitigation measure for the impacted intersection, an additional left turn lane is recommended. This improves the LOS from "F" to "D" and reduces the ICU value from 1.23 to 0.90. Using only 70% of the additional new lane capacity. ' 13 ' o The complete project has been analyzed as per the City ' requirements. II 14 10416DAM ' INTERSCC/IDN CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INT I R.CCT ION: SRISTOL STREET S SIRCH STREET 4160 ENIS1 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAffiC WINTER/SPRING 1909 AM .....................................................................................:....... I IE%IST ING(PROPOSED(EXIST ING 1EXIST INGIREGIONAL ICOMMITTED I PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementI Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I ICapacityleapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volune 1w/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I I ------------------------------------------------- ..... ....................I NL I I I I I I I I I I•-••-••---•----- ------------•----------------- -------------------- -----------------.-- i N, i I 4-- I I i5^ 14--- 1 1$ I.4Q1 MR 1 1 74 I 1 0 1 ___.1__0_ 1 �� 1 I----------------- ---------------•-•--_--------- .-.... --...... -1 I St. 1 1600 1 1 9e 1 0.06 m 1 38 1134 1 0 1 136 I p• O$.�C ------------------------------------------------ •---•---------•----- --------•-_--_-.----I I ST 1 32001 1 161 1 0.05 1 1 6- 114C 14 1 U6 1 I----•-------•---•---------------•--------------- -I t ` SR I I I I I t I I I • I p 4 - - - -M-F • - ------------------------------------------ ELI 1600 **2gAQ'1 929 ` 0./. 1 332- 11AS1 . I ac 1 1K7T1 1--•---_-•--_-------•--_--=---••-----_.___- ---I i ET I 1 1023 . 1 1 3 A 3 .1134 6 l o l 134 01 ^ — I- -ER'••) 3200 I--------'--------) 0.35 -•- •....... I I 103 1 1 0 1 t03 1 4 1 t03 I I------•-•------ -------------•-----------•--.- --------------.----- -------------------- I WL I I I I I I I I I ----'•-----------------------=----------------- -------------------- WT I I I I i -••.------•'-...•---- I WR I I I i I --------------•--•-------••---I- I 1E%(STING___________________________i.o 6 4_i__.------ i I__._--------•-------------------•---__.---•-•----------------.-__-.-..----•- 1 (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I I I I.............•-.---..---.-_-----•-------•-.-.-••.-_..•.-•.---.-..-__--------••------..-----I ' 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. _ 1 O.90 1 .................... •• Assunes no through traffic in left lane x Project + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 1 l Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will bo less than or equal to 0.90 1-1 Projected • project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will ' be less than I.C.U. without project ...................................................•..................................... Description of system improvement: ' tn elp et� f3La,} e2L tP9 _ —t� PA�e7fGT TABLr 5: ICU ANALYSIS — MITIGATION MEASUPJ` - I ' 15 64416DAM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZA110N ANALYSIS IN119S1CIION: SPIS70L STRrfI R (ARCH SiRirl 4160 EXIST TRArrIC VOLLMES DASrD ON AVERAGE DAItV TRAffIC WINTER/SPRING -.---•'...1909 AM- ........................................................................... I (EXIST ING(PROPOSED IEX I ST IMGIEXIST ING IREGIDNAL(COMMITTEDI PROJECTED ,PROJECTIPROJECII ' IMovementI lanes I lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWiN I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IV011amo I V/C I I ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I VOILM I Volum• 1w/o Projectl 1 Ratio I I I I I I I i I Volume 1 I I ................................................. I .... i NL 1 I I I I I I I I- •- -.........._.. i I 4 ' 55 -••..--• - -I I -- ---- o I -MR 1 i 74 ---------1 1 --- ---- I �E4 --- ° I ` 1 1 St. 1 1600 1 1 9B 1 0.06 ` 1 38 1134 1 0 1 136 1 O 08 it 1------------------------------------------------ ---------- ------ --------•---.---....I I ST 1 32001 1 1611 0.051 1 !T 116C 1 4 1 It6 I I -------------------------------------------- ---------------- ...................... ' 1 SR i i I I I t - -------- I I EL 1600 "a 1601 929 ` o•/. 1 332 1 IATI I At 11,2TH i ----------•--------------'-•--...._._..•--'- ----....------•• '-'•-'--'--•-••I i E7 - .4601 ---- I 1 3R3 --346 i o 1134E17 3200 - - "'-'-'-----) 035 .... ...........'•-'--- C _..,-.....--...---•• I 0 • 3 S 1 ER 1 1 103 I__. ____I_ 0 1 103 1 0 1 1031 i__----•-•------ ------•--.._-•-- ----------•-- --- ---------------- I WL I I I I I I I I I I I----"•--------------------------------------••. •----------------•- .............. 1 I WT I I I I I I I I I I '•-.•-...-----..•------.--•----•---•--._.."--•- -------------------._'--------------------1 I WR I I I I I I I I I I l•-._..-•---_-•_-_--_-••__._-•••_.•••.-..-••••--•_-_••••••-_•_••-•-_.__•-----•-••••--_-----•1 (EXISTING I 0•6t I 1 ---- -- -- -----' --___.-••_ _______----' -•---- -.-__----_ EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I I 1 I-..._-•••----•_________________________________________________________••-_---.._.__._�n_-•'1 ' IEXISIING • COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH ♦ PRCJECT I.C.U. 11 V 2.1 •• Assumes no through traffic in left lane I�( Project + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to D.90 ' I i Projected • project traffic I.C.U. will bo greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected • project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be ' less then or equal to 0.90 (_1 Projected ♦ project traffic I.C.U. with project iRprovements will ' be less than I.C.U. without project .......................... .. . .. .. . Description of system IRprovement: RAW W RO e.lte,w/&a,} ' MNitT TAISLr 5: ICU ANALYSIS - MITIGATION MEASUPT -11 ' 16 L ' i APPENDIX "A" COMMITTED PROJECTS LIST 1 t ' TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE REPORT ON APPROVED PROJECT VOLUMES PROD-NBK ALL PROJECTS ON FILE: APPROVED VOLUME IS WEIGHTED BY 001 HUGHES AIRCRAFT #1 100% OCCUPANCY 002 SUNSETTED 000% OCCUPANCY ' 003 FAR WEST SAVINGS AND LOAN 100% OCCUPANCY 004 SUPERSEDED 000% OCCUPANCY 005 AERONUTRONI'C FORD 080% OCCUPANCY 0,06 BACK BAY OFFICE 100% OCCUPANCY ' 007 BOYLE ENGINEERING 100% OCCUPANCY 008 CAL CANADIAN SANK 100% OCCUPANCY 009 CIVIC PLAZA 075% OCCUPANCY ' 010 CORPORATE PLAZA 030% OCCUPANCY 011 KOLL CENTER NEWPORT 100% OCCUPANCY 012 MACARTHUR COJRT 032% OCCUPANCY 013 NATIONAL EDUCATION OFFICE 000% OCCUPANCY 014 NORTH FORD 000% OCCUPANCY 015 ORCHARD OFFICE 100% OCCUPANCY 016 PACIFIC MUTUAL PLAZA 100% OCCUPANCY ' 017 3701 BIRCH OFFICE 10D% OCCUPANCY 018 NEWPORT PLACE 077% OCCUPANCY 019 SUNSETTED 000% OCCUPANCY 020 BANK OF NEWPORT 100% OCCUPANCY 021 BAYSIDE SQUARE 100% OCCUPANCY 022 SEA ISLAND 037% OCCUPANCY ' 023 SAYWOOD APARTMENTS 100% OCCUPANCY 024 HARBOR POINT HOMES 025% OCCUPANCY 025 ROGER'S GARDENS 100% OCCUPANCY 026 SEAVIEW LUTHERAN PLAZA 100% OCCUPANCY 027 RUDY BARON 100% OCCUPANCY 028 QUAIL BUSINESS CENTER 10G% OCCUPANCY 029 441 NEWPORT BLVD, IOU% OCCUPANCY ' 030 MARTHA' S VINEYARD 000% OCCUPANCY 031 VALDEZ 000% OCCUPANCY 032 COAST BUSINESS CENTER 005% OCCUPANCY ' 033 KOLL CENTER NPT N09 1 TPP 000% OCCUPANCY 034 SEE PROJECTS 340 TO 343 000% OCCUPANCY 035 ROSS MOLLARD 040% OCCUPANCY 036 SUNSETTED 000% OCCUPANCY ' 039 HUGHES AIRCRAFT 42 IOU% OCCUPANCY 040 SUPERCEDED 100% OCCUPANCY Q41 FLAGSHIP HOSPITAL 100% OCCUPANCY ' 042 BIG CANYON 10 024% OCCUPANCY 043 FUN LONE 100% OCCUPANCY 044 MARRIOTT HOTEL 100% OCCUPANCY ' 045 ST, ANDREWS CHURCH 100% OCCUPANCY 046 YMCA 000% OCCUPANCY 047 ALLRED CONDOS 100% OCCUPANCY 048 MORGAN DEVELOPMENT 100% OCCUPANCY ' 049 FOUR SEASONS HOTEL 100% OCCUPANCY O50 UNIV ATH CLUB TPP 4 EMKAY 100% OCCUPANCY OS1 BLOCK 400 MEDICAL 100% OCCUPANCY ' 052 SHERATON EXPANSION 000% - OCCUPANCY TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE ' REPORT ON APPROVED PROJECT VOLUMES 053 SEE PROJECTS 530 TO 533 000% OCCUPANCY 054 AMEND NO 1 MCARTHUR COURT 052% OCCUPANCY ' 056 AMENDMENT NO 2 FORD AERO 10U% OCCUPANCY 057 CARVER GRANVILLE OFFICE 100% OCCUPANCY 058 CORONA DEL MAR HOMES l0u% OCCUPANCY ' 059 BIG CANYON VILLA APTS. 000% OCCUPANCY 06❑ 1400 DOVE STREET OOu% OCCUPANCY 061 1100 QUAIL STREET 000% OCCUPANCY ' 062 SUPERSEDED 000% OCCUPANCY 063 KOLL CENTER TPP AMEND, 4A 000% OCCUPANCY 064 SUNSETTED 100% OCCUPANCY ' 065 ROSAN'S DEVELOPMENT 090% OCCUPANCY 056 BLOCK 500 NPT CTR PROD 100% OCCUPANCY 068 NEWPORT AQUATICS CENTER 045% OCCUPANCY 069 2600 E COAST HWY 000% OCCUPANCY 070 JASMINE PARK 100% OCCUPANCY 071 SUNSETTED 000% OCCUPANCY U72 NEWPORTER INN EXPANSION 100% OCCUPANCY 073 SUNSETTED 000% , OCCUPANCY 074 SUNSETTED 000% OCCUPANCY 075 FASHION IS RENAISSANCE 030% OCCUPANCY 076 SUNSETTED 100% OCCUPANCY ' 077 CDM SENIOR PROJECT 100% OCCUPANCY 078 POINT DEL MAR 100% OCCUPANCY 079 PACIFIC CLUB 100% OCCUPANCY ' 080 RIVERSIDE RETAIL BUILDING 001% OCCUPANCY Dal NEWPORT SEACREST APT 100% OCCUPANCY 082 20TH ST BED/BREAKFAST INN 001% OCCUPANCY 083 3800 CAMPUS DR ( M—STORAGE ) 001% OCCUPANCY 084 ' HOAG CANCER CENTER 000% OCCUPANCY 085 EDWARDS NEWPORT CENTER 0012 OCCUPANCY 086 SEASIDE APTS ( MESA II ) 100% OCCUPANCY 087 VICTORIA STATION ( OFFICE ) 100% OCCUPANCY 088 3760 CAMPUS ❑R ( M—STORAGE ) 001% OCCUPANCY 089 NEWPORI IMPORTS 001% OCCUPANCY ' 090 NEWPORT PLACE TOWER 001% OCCUPANCY U91 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE 001% OCCUPANCY 092 MARINERS ' MILE MARINE CTR 040% OCCUPANCY ' 093 15TH STREET APARTMENTS 100% OCCUPANCY 094 SEASIDE APARTMENTS III 000% OCCUPANCY 095 NPT BAY RETIREMENT INN ❑00% OCCUPANCY 0Q6 NEWPORT CLASSIC INN 000% OCCUPANCY ' 097 MARINERS CHURCH EXPANSION DOD% OCCUPANCY 098 MCLACHLAN—NEWPORT PL 000% OCCUPANCY 099 1501 SUPERIOR MEDICAL 000% OCCUPANCY t 100 FASHION ISLAND a2 000% OCCUPANCY 101 NEWPORTER RESORT EXPAND. 000% OCCUPANCY 102 TACO BELL 000% OCCUPANCY 103 NEWPORT LIDO MEO CENTER 000% OCCUPANCY 104 VILLA POINT 000% OCCUPANCY 105 SHOKRIAN 000% OCCUPANCY 106 15TH ST APTS 000% OCCUPANCY ' 107 ROCKWELL EXPANSION 00U% OCCUPANCY TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE ' REPORT ON APPROVED PROJECT VOLUMES 108 ANDREW RESTAURANT 000% OCCUPANCY ' 109 BALBOA / WASHINGTON 000% OCCUPANCY 340 AMENDMENT N0. 1 FORD AERO 100% OCCUPANCY 341 AMENDMENT NO* 1 FORD AFRO 000% OCCUPANCY 342 AMENDMENT N0. 1 FORD AERO DOG% OCCUPANCY ' 343 AMENDMENT NO* 1 FORD AERO 000% OCCUPANCY 530 AMENDMENT NO 1 NORTH FORD 100% OCCUPANCY 531 AMENDMENT NO 1 NORTH FORD 100% OCCUPANCY ' 532 AMENDMENT NO 1 NORTH FORD 100% OCCUPANCY 533 AMENDMENT NO 1 NORTH FORD 000% OCCUPANCY 910 NEWPORT DUNES 000% OCCUPANCY ' 920 BAYVIEW 000% OCCUPANCY 930 CITY OF IRVINE DEV, 000% OCCUPANCY ' APPENDIX "B" ' REGIONAL GROWTH FACTORS ' REGION ALTRAFFIC hNNUAL GROWTH PATE COAST HIGHWAY ' East City Limit to MacArthur Boulevard 4% MacArthur Boulevard to Jamboree Road EA ' Jamboree Road to Newport Boulevard is Newport Boulevard to West City Limit 2.5% R= VINE A°ENUE ' All 1:6� JAMBOREE ROAD ' Coast Highway to MacArthur Boulevard 1'k MACARTHUR BOULEVARD, ' Coast Highway to Jamboree Road 6°b Jamboree Road to North City Limit 1°b ' NEWPOR.T BOULEVARD Coast Highway to North City Limit 1S Street segments not listed have 0% regional growth.+ RME:bb ' 7-21-86 I I 1 II 1 I ' I APPENDIX "C" ' TRIP GENERATION RATES ' CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ' PEAK HOUR GENERATION RATES ' AM GPM IN OUT IN OUT ' RESIDENTIAL (per D.U. ) Single Family .3 .6 .7 .3 ' Attached Medium Density .2 .4 .5 .3 Apartments .1 .3 .4 .2 ' Fp F,ICE (,per d000 sq, ft. ) General 2.0 .4 .6 1 .7 ' Medical .6 .2 1 .9 2.4 ' RETAIL .(per 1000 sq. ft. ) General .7 .5 1 .5 2.0 ' HOTEL (per room) .6 .3 .5 .3 RESTAURANT ' Quality (sit-down) 1 .0 .5 5.0 3.0 BANK/S & L W/o Drive Thru 4.0 2.0 5.3 3.5 ' W/ Drive Thru HOSPITAL (Per bed) .9 .4 (Per 1000 sq. ft. ) ' CHURCH W/o Preschool/School .5 .1 ' W/ Preschool/School 1 .5 .4 bb 4-21-fib i 1 APPENDIX "D" ' ONE PERCENT AND ICU WORK SHEETS 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BL/CAMPUS DR ' (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 9 _ AM - Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10 of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 211 Hour Peak 21% Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2k Hpur Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 1857 1- � oZ 5 69 Q 1A' Southbound 2916 1. , S I O I I Q Eastbound 2581 O 02 Westbound Q ' I 819— 4_ ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 23-2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization LIM (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. II cu 1 'RQpa40.1AVANt _ DATE:it 10 Aa pnh 19$9 ' PROJECT: FORM I 36 P MA4300AM ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD 4 CAMPUS DRIVE 4300 ' -EXIST-TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING -'--- •-1989-AN - - I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECT] IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio lVolume I V/C ] I (CapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Project] I Ratio I I I I I I I I Volume I I ►--------------------------------------------------------------------------------•---------- ' I WL I 1600I 1 91 I 0.061 1 1 0 152. 0.o61 o 1 02. 1 i--------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------I NT I 6400 I 1 679 I 0.11 * * I 16 0 1946 0-131 3-T 1 "1 1 0. 1 '+ '>K ]--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- --------------I i MR 1 1600 1 1 7a I 0.05 I I I O I -+• o osi 0 1 8.6 1 SL 1 1600 1 1 231 I 0.14 * 0 I 1--1 S2 1 3% 0.4 0 1 385 1 0.2 4------------------------------------------------ - - -------- ------------------- ST 1 4800 1 1 884 1 0.18 1 9 1 4421 13% M1 � 113421 0.2-13 ]______________________________________________________________________ ____________________I SR 1 1600 I I 248 I 0.16 1 �1 1 0 1 so 0.161 O.-I Rro 1•--------------•------------- --- - -------- -------------------- EL 1 3200 1 1 377 1 0.12 1 I 0 1 33'} 0.12.1 0 13141 ------------------------------ --------------------I I ET 1 1 710 1 1 14.9 1 jqg 0301 0 1 $59 --------) 3200 ----------------'-) 0.25 *----__'_----- --------------------I 0. 3 0 ' ] ER I 1 105 I l o I IK I 1 a 1 (09* I WL 1 1600 1 1 60 1 0.04 * 1 0 1 4c) 0,041 O 16 0 1 d 0 4 ' I---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------I I WT 1 3200 1 1 270 1 0.08 1 1 A..9 1 a99 0'091 0 1 a9✓ 1 ----------------------------------------------------- .................... ,. I WR I N.S. 1 1 47 1 1 1 31 1 5'0 I Q I Jr0 _______________________________________________ ____________________ I EXISTING 1 ---I ---- ' 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0•--Z. I 1 I___________________________________________________________________________________________1 (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. 1 0.121 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less then I.C.U. without project ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' Description of system improvement: &k d Rean htUya n L- 10 RkykLm-, g9 PROJECI FORM 11 ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis intersection MACARTHUR BL CAMPUS DR ' (Existing Traffic Vol—ume-s--T)ased on Average inter pring 19 L9 PM Peak 21s Hour Approved ' Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2), Hour Growth Peak 2J. Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2-, Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound -- i 6A 2334 I• . oZ 3Zg6 southbound 4668 6156 Tads EM �6 ' Eastbound 1956 _ 0 12. ;20 1? a� 0 i Westbound 2011 0 •j 30 A94 I &S � ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. ' O-Ff.' to Glkd Rean hauvan� DATE• )0 ' PROJECT: FORM 1 MA43DOPM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS LEVARD ' -INTERSECTIONC VOL MACARTNED ON AVERAGE i CAMPUS DRIVE--- 4300 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC MINTER/SPRING 1989 PM I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIDNALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVolume I V/C I ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume IW/o Projectl I Ratio I 1 I I I I I I I Volume I I I---------------------------------------------------------------------- I Ni. 1 1600 1 1 160 1 0.10 * a 1 0 1 162 0.101 0 1 0 1 0 - l 0 al` ----I I NT 1 6400 1 1 784 1 0•12 1 g- 1 4.g 1 11223 o•19 1 31 I---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- ----------I ' I MR 1 1600 1 1 81 1 0.05 1 1 1 0 1 82. 0•051 %' I TS 1 I---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ----I I SL 1 1600 1 1 267 1 0.17 1 3 1 *1 1 31$ 0-ad O 131 I-------------------------------------------------------------------- - ---------------- I ST 1 4800 1 1 1055 1 0.22 * 11 1 e2S A, 11320 0•2I 13 113331 0. 2.q � -•--- --- I SR 1 1600 1, 1 838 1 0.52 1 $ 1 0 1 346 0.511 O 1 8461 ' 1........ ------------------------------------------------------------ •----------------- I I EL 1 3200 1 1 265 1 0.08 * 1 0 1 R6f 0-011 O 1 AC c i C) O g g -•------------•--------------- 519 1 1 46 1569' 0•,101 O 1 5.661 I•--ER--) 320D '-----------------) 0.19 ---_______________________ ____________________I az 1 1 0 1 $2 1 0 , I $-a I I--------------------------------------------------------------------- •--I ---------- - ' I WL 1 1600 1 1 79 1 0.05 1 1 0 1 : -s 0.0M 0 I :f9 I ----------------------------•----------- •---------i __.wT__i_ '320D 1 1 742 1 0.23 * 1 131 I It4-3 O.2f1 O 02�- ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- - I ' WR I H.S. I 1 91 1 1 1 134 1115 I o 1 taS I I 0.63 ----------------I (EXISTING .......................... -•• �..___...________...___'_-____ I 1____________________________________________________________________________ I ' (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 6--+3 1 1 __________________________________I (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. -_-'----------------•_----_I _________________________________________________________ ' I�1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less then or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected+ project traffic I.C.U. will be greater then 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project inprovements will be less than I.C.U. without project --- -------------------------------------------•------ Description of system improvement: e,W ce aald -Re" Aayantt )0 Lk-lm rye ' PROJECT ORM 1 , 3� D ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis dntersection JAMBOREE RD/CAMPUS DR (Existing Traffic Vol—um—e—s--Eased on Average inter pring 9 _ AM ' Peak 2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1" of Projected Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2)j Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2�; Hour Peak 2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume — I ' Northbound 2481 _ �, . 2S 5.0 33 ! g Southbound 3933 1 . . .3 ' ( Eastbound 652 _ _ ' 6 ' Westbound 2220_ T 0. ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. 4 hVA Ya 1it DATE: 0 ' PROJECT: FORM I JA4305AM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD 8 CAMPUS DRIVE 4305 ' EXIST TRAFFIC- • - _ _-_-VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING _ ___-- 1989 AM _ I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI ' IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio 1Votume I V/C I I 1CapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I I i---------------------'---------------------------------------------------------------------I ' I NL I ---- I i -- l ---- * I 1 _.__._._._L------I I ' l NT 1 1 957 1 1 1 1 1 1 --------) 6400' ------------------) 0.16 i__•----_i___•-•--_i___-.______-__..___-..__-_- i I 1___________________________________________________________________________________________I SL I 320D 1 1 240 1 0.08 1 1 --------I--------^-! 1 ------- ------I ST I ' 1427 1 1 1 1 1 1 -------- ------- 0.34 *--- - sRI 1 -------------------r---------------------------------------- ' EL 1 1 89 1 1 I 1 1 I ..____• w•___________________ L --------) 4800 I--------I- ) 0.04 --------------'----------1 ( NIA) � 1 124 I I I i I I 1--. --- --------------------- -----------•---------------I i ER 1 N.S. I 1 291 I I--•_-____--_ ---------------------- 1 -L----- ---- --- ----1 i i * ..'----I----------------------•------!------- 1 WT 1 3200 1 1 545 1 0.17 1 1 1 1 1 i i-------------------------------------------------------------------------------•-----------i WR i 1600 1 i 189 1 0.12 •-----•-------I ]EXISTING 1 -•U_77_------------------------------------- - -- -------------------------------- I ' 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. _I_ _ --- I ___ _---I 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. I • I .--___-•-__.__•..__._•._..____•••-_-_-___.__•----------------------------------•-_.__.---..._ ' i_I Project less th n or equa 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 ID Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' 1_I Projected + project 'traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project ..................•.-...-•--'•-•--•-------------...__. ' Description of system improvement: - ' PROJECT FORM 11 I' ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD CAMPUS DR ' (Existing Traffic Volumes base on verage inter pring 9 8g PM Peak 2� Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Projected Project Direction Peaour Peaour Peaour Peaour Peaour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume — II Northbound 3916 �. , g q 6 �J gs o Southbound 3897 39 6 �'&' 9 2 Eastbound 2083 O 02, 10 a 2 0 Westbound 1543 _0 112, 1665' I ' 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. t - Rem buu YAVL� DATE: IOle PROJECT: J'1 FORM I L -- ' JA4305PH ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIOW ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD $ CAMPUS DRIVE 4305 ' -EXIST-TRAFFIC-VOLUMES- - - _-_. _ _ -BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING __- .'-----1989-PH- IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C ,I I ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Project) I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I I___________________________________________________________________________________________ ' I NL 1 16001 1 561 0.041 1 1 1 1 1 i -NT.___________i_______-i---1365---_______i________i_________-___________-_______i_______ --------) 6400 ------------------) 0.29 -----------------------------------------------I t1 MR 1 1 --- I I I I I St. 1 ---- I 1 --- 1 ---- -------------------I-------------------I I 1 ST---i--------I--------I-- n18 -__------I I I I I-------1 I•-------i 4800 ----------------- 0.26 i--------I---------------------i---------------I I•------------•------- --------------------------------------------------------'-----------I ' I EL i I I --- I I I 1 ------------ I I I I NA ETI 1 6-- I _______-________-_________-___________-_______- I I ' I ER I N.S. 1 1 116.1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1___________________________________________________________________________________________ i WL 1 1600 1 1 144 1 0.09 R I I I I I I-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I WT 1 32001 1 2221 0.071 1 I 1 1 I i--------------------------------------------------------- ------------I w 1 WR 1 1600 1 1 176 1 0.11 1 1 1 1 1 I I--------•----------------------------------------------------------------------------------I (EXISTING 1 0.76 1 i 1____________________________________________________________________________ i ' (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. i____-- ____1____ _____ ____1 (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. I I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM 11 ' 2 / � ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection MACARTHUR BL/BIRCH 5T (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 89 AM ' Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 24 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volpme ' I Northbound 1394 1. , 142 2. g30 g Southbound 2423 2-A. Q 8 33 33 Eastbound 1239 S�Q I 16 �g i ' Westbound 828 _— 3Ci 66 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume ' ® Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. ' DATE: O GQ PROJECT: FORM I MA4295AN ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD $ BIRCH STREET 4295 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING ----_---_-1989 AM IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C 1 ' I ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Project) I Ratio I I I I I I I I I volume I----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I NL 1 1600 1 1 47 1 0.03 1 0 11 1409 0,631 p 1 4!9 1 ------------------------------------------------- ------••-------------I 1-_-NT--•1_--4800 ' I 1 1 .505 1 0.11 • -- I 1`5I-- 90.191 0 1 ------------------------------ ------ --- ---------------- NR113 1i I N.S. I I 62 i 1 I I 13 I -T6 1 { . 1________________________________ i i SL 1 1600 1 1 172 1 0.11 • 2 1 0 1 0•II 13S 1209 10 • I$ ----------•----------------- r -,----•- -•- - ---- ' I ST 1 1 681 1 11061 0121 O i 1061 I-------- 1 SR I 1 z4s 0 I ��__132 12. 10 1322 EL ._._...._ 1 184 1 1 '28 12-12 1 a 12121........) ____� _ y� I ET 4800 1 1 433 0.14 * I la$ 1 561 o:ql_ 1 '+ 1 �j;g1 c• ( S 71i -------I ' 1 ER I I so I I 1 161 I C 1151 1 _____________________________________________________________________ _____________ I' uL 1 1600 1 1 37 1 0.02 1 1 9.3 1 -+0 0-041 5 .1.---------------------------------------------------------------- - --__ I WT 1 3200 1 1 287 1 0.09 • I Ip 0.10 I g 13291 0 . 10 ` ----------------------- ... --- _•......_..T......... I WR I H.S. 1 1 571 1 i 0 15:1 1 a- 1 68 I ------------- IEXISTING I_________________________i 0.45 I "-- . ___.._____.____..___.______...__ I 1---------------------------------------------------------------i---- --- I I (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1•--• ---------------•-----------I (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. _-••-_-_1 0:5'6 1 ____________________________________________________________________________ ' LX Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less then or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. wilt be greater than 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement wilt be Less then or equat to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements wilt be less than I.C.U. without project ------------------------------------------------------------------------•---•--•--------- ' Description Of system improvement; ai^ 14' l?e��fac• vah � to ►�u �9 PROJECT FORM fl' 3� � ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis intersection MACARTHUR BL/BIRCH ST ' (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Inter pring _ M Peak 2)1 Hour Approved ' Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2§ Hour Peak 2, Hour Peek R4 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 1753 - �•�, Q 6S'O 2� Southbound 2224 ,-�• as s 2 �]0 2-92-6 ' Eastbound 1387 2 0 — _ 16 2-3-- b ' O Westbound 2110 $6 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. 04-P a Q.lw_ ea4 I=YA m C DATE: I D 19tnq� 971 PROJECT: FORM I 35� ' MA4295PM ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD Z BIRCH STREET 4295 ' EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC MINTER/SPRING ---- ---__----__-•-1989 PM- I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI ' IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I WC I I ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I 1 Volume I I I ----I ' I NL 1 1600 I 1 142 1 0.09 * I I 1 1141 0 i 1 13 l IS6 1 0 1 I---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----11 ------------ -- ---------------- I NT I 4800 1 1 592 1 0.12 1 6 1 41 q I (OR 0-0 0 110 p• 4 1 __________________________I___ -. _ I ' I NR I M.S. I 1 31 1 1 0 1 2$ 1 Sg 1 0 1 Sq --•••----- I i SL I 160D 1 1 56 1 0.04 1 ( 1 0 1 S_7 0.04 0 1 50+ ---------- -- -•••• .............................. I ST I 1 719 1 4 1 210 1939 tIi 0.M 1 0 1192-.-3�--0--I11 0 l q --------? 6400 ------------------0 0.15 -------- ----- ---- SR � z1s I12 � 461._..____�._. _.__.._.._ _. :._. ____ . 0 -------- EL 1 1 275 ) 1 1 5 0 13K 0.1,5 32S� ........� ------------- - -------------------- ET 4800 1 1 294 0.13 * 1 �0 136e} 1 1-- 1 78 1 1 0. 16 + j ER '-� 1 1 48 � 1 1 ( 1,49 1 0 149 1 1_____________________________________________________________________ ' I WL 1 1600 1 1 e2 1 0.04 1 1 Or 1 124 0.091 2.3 I I S0 1 1--------------------•------------------------------------------ WT 1 3200 1 1 747 1 0.23 * I (p I SSI 0 2* 31.11?101 0.2-S + I------------•------------------------------ ..._ ' I WR i N.S. 1 I 2371 1 1 0 123 1 1 I 1................•-.-..---- . . �-•--.-•.---...--__-___--. -------------------- IEXI STING I 0.60 1 1-------------------------------------------------•-------•------------------ I !EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PRDPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0•"+3 1 I i-----------------------------------------------_--------------------------------------- __I (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. __---_-_-•--•_-10_43 I _________________________ _-____-_____________••-_-.•-__-•- ' 1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. wilt be less than or equal to 0.90 ' I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater then 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic T.C.U. w/systems improvement wilt be Less than or equal to 0.90 I_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements wilt be less than I.C.U. without project ' Description of system improvement: ' APh' U- a14d 12ca. Wyaht- 10 ALAeJ1 ' -PROJECT FORM II ' 35D 1% Traffic Volume Analysis intersection JAMBOREE RD/BIRCH ST (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 9 _ AM ' Peak 211 Hour Approved Hpproach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 21s Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2;1 Hour Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 2519 o•• C T 3 2.02 2 ��— Southbound 4595 0- • °20p�9 66 6� l ( g ' Eastbound 546 _ 0• . / 3 63 6 ¢ i ' Westbound 10 _ —Q•l 0 3 L} Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 212 Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than N of Projected Peak 2Z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. f DATE: A ' PROJECT: FORM I 4S JA4308AM ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD 8 BIRCH STREET 4308 ' -EXIST.TRAFFIC VOLUMES-BASED _ -•-' BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1989 AM _---_---------------- • ,EXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTING,EXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTED, PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI (Movement, Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVolume I ' V/C I ' I ICapacitylCapacity, Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume [w/o Project, I Ratio I I I I I I I I I volume I I I I-----•-------•--_---••-----------•------------- ------•e-1---•--------I I NL 1 1600 1 1 236 1 0.15 * --L.-D----I234 0_15'1 26 1 U211 O • ( b I------------------------------------------------- .I I NT 1 1 1061 1 1 342 11403 0311 O 114031 I--------) 4800 ------------•-----) 0.22 ---- --- --- -- _----I 0. 30 - NR I 1 18 I-----•---------- ------------------------------ ------------------ ----------------- I I SL I 1600 I I 15 I 0.01 1 1 0 1 IS 0011 0 1 1S I 0. 0 1 I ST I 4800 , 1 1533 I 0.32 * I q� I Rr6 052I' la�Ot}I 0 • SZ SR i N.S. 1 1 781 1 1 0./, 1 S 1 1 = 1 41 1 21-1 1 ---------1 EL 1 1 174 • 1 1 23 1 N+ 0. g L I---ET--) 3200 I--_-------•----•-) 0.06 ----- --•-' ---•---- • - ----- 1 �'0 ' T I 8 1 1 S- 1 13 1 4 1 l$ 1 ' ,------------------------------------------------- ------------------- --- --I ------- - --- ER ' i N.S. 1 1 57 1 1 1 19 1 ;�6 1 4 1 90 1 -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------•------------I WL 1 1 4 1 1 o I + 1 0 1 4 1 ' ,--------) ------------------) ----- •----------------- ---------------------I 1 WT 1600 1 1 1 0.00 * 1 O 1 1 1 (- 1 1 $ 1 ----------------- ---- ---------------- ...... I WR I I 1 I____ _ 1 0 1 _1._______1__6 1 0 1 I---------------------------- ----- ----•-----•I 1EXISTING 1 0.53 1 1 1-----------------------••--------••------------------------------•-•-------- I ' 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I 6-': .. I I 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. 1 O•T.S I --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I' IIX Projected,+ project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be Less than or equal to 0.90 ' I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be Less than I.C.U. without project ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' Description of system improvement: ' a4; Le a.kd R&,L AAvAIn t ' PROJECT FORM II ZE�� ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/BIRCH ST ' (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 _ PM ' Peak 2)1 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 211 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 2402 O' . 1666 069 1 1 20 Southbound 3147 402- 1 1 40 I 6 ' Eastbound 1474 0' ,2 �-0 90 i Westbound 34 _ _ _ 0' b 3 ! �4 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. ' t DATE: ( 0 ' PROJECT: FORM I Z�� ' JA4308PM � I ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & BIRCH STREET 4308 t EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1989 PH _--_----•----------------•-_--------•---_--_------_•---------_------------------------------- I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I ' I I Capacity]Capacity] Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume [w/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I I I------------------------------------------------ ------------------ ---------------------i ' I NL 1 1600 1 1 54 1 0.03 * 1 3 1 S� O•�A i (0 1 6'+ 1 O .O 4 �- I------------------------------------------------ ----------- _ - -------------I I NT 1 1 1087 1 - I gar II QQpl 0 1112-2J 0•40 i--------3 4800 ------------------) 0.23 ---- -------------- --- -- --------I I NR I 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 10 1 0 1 - --------------- - I SL 1 16001 1 31 0.001 1 0 1 3 0.01 0 1 3 1 i------------------------------------------------- - ----------- ---------------------I ' I ST 1 4800 1 1 1112 1 0.23 * 1 3 13 I ( 6.311 0 115,0 (�•3 I I----------------------------------------------- - i SR I N.S. 1 1 193 1 1 O ye I 62 I X 1 3 1 - 1 I------------------------------------------------- ------------------ ---------------------I t I EL 1 1 591 1 1 11 + 110$ 0221 IS" 1 *23ll'}}�r --------) 3200 ------------------) 0.19 *---- ----------------- _U o•23 1 ET I I 1--------------- I -- i t -----I I-- 1 16 I -... - ---- -- I I ER I N.S. I 1 139 I I I------------------------------------------------- --- 1146 I I I i� IWL 1 4 I Io ¢ l o i I--------) ------------------) ----- ' WT 1600 1 1 3 0.01 * 1 0 13i �•O1I �- I ( Q I I...-----) ------------------) ---- ------------------ I • i -R I I 1 I I Q I I I I I I 1_________________________________________________ ___________________ ________ ___________I (EXISTING 1 0.46 1 1---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0` S g I I-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. 10.931 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 i_i Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be ` less than or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' Description of system improvement: hat, hy'vot Oki— t ' PROJECT FORM It 1 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/MACARTHUR BL 1 (Existing Traffic Vol—um—e-s-Yaseci on Average Winter/Spring 19 89 AM Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 211 Hour Peak 2)5 Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume 1 Northbound 2119 51 106 5: -6 2-8$01 ZD 52 Southbound 896 445 q59 1099 19 12. 1 Eastbound 3363 D' . Q 1( Z 1"9 0 ! 5 52 Westbound 1746 0 0 2.4.4.6 2 1 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume 1 ® Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. 1 III 1 1 ' 1 1 . 1 16A cc ReAA ku VAk DATE: t O A 1 PROJECT: FORM I ' JA4275AM ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTEIECTION: ' -EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES RON AVE 8 E DAILY TRAFFIC )-•--- 4275---------------------------- EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1989 AM I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVOlume I V/C I IcapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume _lw/o Projectl I Ratio I Volume I I I II I ! -------!-----------------!------- !----- .....................I I------------------- / ' I NL 1 1600 1 1 89 1 0.06 1p� q. I IqD � I_-b_-_!_'""�-1 O • p _ _________________________ _______'--...�----- 1 NT I 1 - 662 Isi' 33I.2S�2 01� 026 1 3 1 I--------) 4800 ----------....•'--) 0.18 *.- ' I NR I I '� a2 ---•-- ©-.1 1$g I------- ---- -----15__IOI 1 SL I 160D 1 1 74 1 0.11 s� I I( 0 1 t" ---- I I sT 1 4800 1 1 2o6 1 0.04 ISx IO 1 101 _9 __1 49SI 0 l o -------------------------------------------------- - -' - SR I N.S. 1 1 132 I IS/. _T ! -ts 1 ! 2. 12�6 ---i ' I------------------------------------------------- r 6S� I I ET I 480D 1 1 1133 0.24 1 --1 - _____1 (>►o ajQ I o 16+ 6 ------------ .................. - I I 1 I o 3++ i i ER I N.S. 1 1 67 1 1 ! 24. --'-- b-!•g ! 1.11.a i ' 1 WL 1 3200 1 1 76 1 0.02 * p ( 5' I IAI iaa -- I ----------------------------- ----- -- WT 1 4800 1 1 524 1 0.11 1 p 1 ,2 y 0 1 4(e} _ I Q- i VIP •---I ' 1 WR I N.S. 1 1 2381 1 0 1 p l 0 I 1 0 1 ______________ (EXISTING ..........................i 0.49-"- i________ I ------ I ' (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. __________________________________ (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U--- - -- -- -- --- - -- -I0:--- I ..........................._____________ Projected + project traffic I.C.U. Wilt be less than or equal to 0.90 ' 1_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. wilt be greater than 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement Witt be less than or equal to 0.90 ' (_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. With project improvements Witt be less than I.C.U. without project Description of system improvement: FORM )1 ' PROJECT r' F. L• 1 ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/MACARTHUR BL — (Existing Traffic Vollu—m—e—s—Fas—eZ on Average Winter pring 9 _ PM Peak 2� Hour Approved ' Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2; Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 211 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 1182 69 516 83O+ I g 20 Southbound 3000 12 / 049 41 ' Eastbound 1927 Y _ 11 T6 20+0 2 3337 2 i 2 0 Westbound O- -9*0 —4 — 1 0 — ---- ---- - Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ` ' ❑ Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ' ® (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. ' �r CD aUd DATE• .jd P1 PROJECT. FORM I ' JA4275PM ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & MACARTHUR BOULEVARD 4275 ' EXIST-TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC---- WINTER/SPRING --------------1989-PH - I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVolume I V/C I ' I I CapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume IW/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I 1 I----- --------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------I I Mi. 1 1600 I 1 1911 0.12 *S� 101 020 1221 0`141 0 1221 1 0 ' 14 - ------------'-------'f NT '--'----'----"---- - 229 IR, f 1 1 Z;L 61466 ------------------- I -- ' -- p. 12 iNit 54 I -- I - ------------------------- - ------------ _ _ i SL 1 J6001 1 2121 0.13IEt. 111 110 1333. 0•211 0 1 110 - - ------------- I ' I ST 1 4800 1 1 $81 1 0.18 *f'i• 41 2?,511 0• 1 IS 1 i2i5l 0-L6 1J 1--------------------------------------------i-,y±---q--11-i Qq,S, I ds,6 I g 1103 SR I N.S. 1 1 $34 1 O�. �T_____i_.__ 1 ----------------------------- " ' ----- --- ----------I ................. . tB7 o.ob * I I tl 1 0 1 1 EL 1 3200 1 I 1 35 �•___ - 3�41 I ET 1 4800 1 1 564 1 0.12 1 1 3}1 1 114) 0•L01 10 1 qS-1 I __I I ER I N.S. 1 1 27 1 I 1 .2.0 1 4) 10 g i _______________________________ O I WL I 3200 i i 355 I 0.11 1 0�,� I Sr IA080_R11 I g l I----------------------------•-- I WT 1 4800 1 1 1109 I 0.23 iC50 113`i4 -----I 15' 114te1 1 ------------- WR I N.S. 1 1 44 1 1 1 10 1 S 4' 1 0 1 T+ I ------ I ' (EXISTING .....................'----'' 0.59 i-" ______----'---'---•- _---- I 1---'--- -- I (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0. I,0 I --_---_..-__ -------------------------------------------------------------------'------------------------ (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. 1 0• Vl/ I ' Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 ' (_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be Less than or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project ------------------------^'------------------'-----___--'---------'---'---'--'-'-'-----'- Description of system improvement: t1A It kkomnY PROJECT FORM 11 ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST N CAMPUS DR ' (Existing Traffic Volumesbased on Average Winter/Spring 19 9)AM Peak 231 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1� of Projected Project Direction Peak 2J1 Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 211 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 5293 6 56 6 9 b Southbound 1462 0' • 0 ' Eastbound Westbound 3238 0 04 4 3932 1 34 �- ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. !�2 !"—dLcl h DATE: ' PROJECT: FORM I II ' 4 A ' BR4172AN INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION BRISTOL STREET NORTH 8 CAMPUS DRIVE/IRVINE AVENUE 4172 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING------------------1989 AN ' I - IEXiSTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I WC I GROWTH I PROJECT i V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I I ICapacitylcapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 1w/o Projectl I Ratio I ' I 1 i I I I I i Volume I 1 -----^---------- - NL 1 16001 'I 507 i 0.32 1 1 1____._..__.1 1 1 ------------------------------------------------------ --- •--------------I NT ' �-- I 3---------•--•--- -----1-------* --- - .....•------••---_-------------------------___I MR i I I I I I i I I I ' I--•s----------••-------------------------------•---------------------•-•--------------••---I 1 BY 1 40001 1 3201 0.081 1 1 1 1 1 ______ -------------I ' l SR 1 2400 1 1 335 1 0.14 1 1 1...........................I I I EL I I I I I i I ...__.....I....._.I......-I ______________________________________________ L NIA ET I I I I I I I I I I ----- ER I I I I I I 1' I I 1 --- WL 1 16001 1 2701 0.171 1 1 1 1 1 ------------------------ -------------I i '- ) 6400 ' l ) 0.18 6 •----•--•---•----•----------- •-----"• WR I I 96 I I 1 1 __________________________i - 7 - (EXISTING 1 __.----•-----•-----"-------------------------- 1EXIST I11I + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. i___________I__ •-_-..-_-_•- ' 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.............................I I 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equel'to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic i.C.u. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be _ less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will ' be less than I.C.U. without project Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM 11 ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST N/CAMPUS DR—IRVINE AV ' (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 _) PM ' Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected In of Projected Project Direction Peak 2-, Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 21 Hour Peak 2h Hour Peek 2�, Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 3190 o_ fig 33 8"V' 3 Southbound 3829 Qy. ' Eastbound Q ' Westbound 7378 _ ' F'4 S �pOt3 / 2 46 ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. ' d e aA AIVA Vol h �" DATE: II, , PROJECT: FORM I ' Ac BR4172PM ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION BRISTOL STREET NORTH i CAMPUS DRIVE/IRVINE AVENUE 4172 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1989 PM ' I - IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALIC"ITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I I ICapacitylcapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/0 Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I I ' I----- --------------------------------------------------*------------------------------I I NL I 1600 1 1 509 1 0.32 *._.._._.I I._..____.__I I I __ _________________------___ ________-- __-___________-I I NT .1 3200 1 1 794 ( 0.25 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' --------------------I NR 1 I i 1 1------__I_____-___I---------- _I_______- 1 ' s` __I _______I________I________I________I-_______I______-__I___________I_______I_______I 1 ST 1 32001 1 8211 0.261 1 1 .._____._.1 1 1 -------------I 1 SR i 3200 ** 1 982 1 0.31 * I I 1 -----I-------I 1 1__________________________________________________________________________ E` I 1 --------I--------I I ' ' ------------------1----------I-------------1---- N 1 ET I I I I I I I I I I ----------------------------------------_------------------------------------------ ____I ER I I I I I I -____-__I______-____I__-____ ___I i I WL 1 1600 1 1 545 1 0.34 I I --- -----------i--------i---z�---------i--------i---------i-----------i-------i---- -1 ' I--------) 6400 ------------------) 0.44 *----------------------------------------------I I WR l I 70 I 1 1 1 1 I l_________________________________________________________ ___.____ 1 EXISTING ---^I-----07-I------------------------------- 1 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I---_-'-----1-------- ------ ____________________________________________ 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. I I -- ** ASSUMES NO THROUGH TRAFFIC IN OPTIONAL LANE 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be _ less than or equal to 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM 'll L� 1 �I 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis 1 Intersection BRISTOL ST N/BIRCH ST (Existing Traffic Vol-u-m-e—s-Fased on Average inter pn19 89)AM 1 Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected ION of Projected Project Direction Peak 2-� Hour Growth Peak 2$ Hour Peak 2)1 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 21, Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 3257 �' 693 395-0 A-© ST Southbound 812 0 ' 0 Dp 1 02- i 1 Eastbound Westbound 5 2685 Q /• 4'6 1 -- Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected 1 Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume 1 ® Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. i 1 1 1 1 1 1 64 cc aja JZ mn }uda ya K DATE: 0 1 PROJECT: ' FORM I 1 SA i OR4175AN ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION BRISTOL STREET NORTH i BIRCH STREET 4175 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING .----------1989 AM I •• IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVolume I V/C I I ICapacitylCapscityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume IWO Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I I --' 1 1 I ( 1 I t I i NL I -' i6OD p •P-- - ---- --- ---- --- ! 1 0 1 1 1--3 I ' I NT 1 3200 1 1 1577 1 0.49 * 1 340+ 1112¢ 0.461 441 t 9691 0 . --------------------------- '••---•-'--•--I i .NR _.I.__._._.i_ I I I 1 0 1 1 1 1 •--•-----•----•-- -•---' i I I I i 1 0 1 I I I I....-.-............. I ST 1 1600 1 1 67 1 0.04 1 1 1 4-3 1 l4�-�_��) � �1 4+ 1 I-------•--•-•---------- •---------- -------------- •----I ' I SR 1 32001 1 2641 0.081 Oslo 61 132g 001 S 13361 •--------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------I EL I I I I I I I I I I -----••----------•------------•----•-----•------- ---------•--------- -------------- ----I ET I I I I I I---_ ----- i I ER i I I I I I I I I I I--------••------•----•----•---------------------- I WL 1600 1 1 193 1 0.12 1 1 0 1193 0.111 O 1193 ------------------------------------------------- ------------------ ----- -- WT I 1 890 I I a93 l i193 Orel 0 11183 1 1--- - I 1� 4800 ---•--------------0 o.z1 - I 0. 2$ -- 122 1 1 0 112a 1 0 1 )z2 .._.•________ ____________ - ----------- -----------------------------------------I IEXI ST]NG I 0.70 I I ' 1---------------------------------------------------------------1 0 -- �- 1 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL.GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. - -. - -- -I 6-i I ....................•--.'..-.--.-.--.---...----....-..-----...__....__...----..__...--..---- l�l Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be — Less then or equal to 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project __........_'____'_..._.•________________________• ....................................... Description of system improvement: • " _ - u i'�.LL na fatiwu tit- Q , ' PROJECT FORM 11 SB ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection BRISTOL ST N/BIRCH ST_ (Existing Traffic Volumes based on verage Winter/Spring 19 89) PM t Peak 21$ Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2+1 Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2)S Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 24 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 1091 Southbound 3842 0 - 544 4STJ Eastbound j � Westbound 4248 0 -/ . 13�3 C-62. 5^6 D ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 21� Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 1 1 DATE: ' PROJECT: JJ FORM I jG BR4175PH ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION BRISTOL STREET NORTH i BIRCH STREET 4175 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING----'-------------1989 PM_ '.................................................................. ' I IEXISTiNGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I I ICapecitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volune lw/o Projectl I Ratio I 1 --I I -------------------------I-- ----I---------- volume---------------------I I ML 1 1600 I 1 115 I 0.07 • 1 0 1115, 6-0+1 I----------------------------------------------- -------------- ---- ' I NT 1 3200 1 1 327 1 0.10 1 1. 1`0- 1- �4 0-12.1 1"' 1 1+11 1 0 �3 ---- I NR I I I I I I I I I I ----------------------------------------------- ------------------•- ---------------------I ' I SL I I I I 1 I' I I I I I --- .-.-". -.. - _ ... ---------------------I I GT 1 16001 1 4391 0.271 1 40 14;q 0.31 1S 1414.1 0.31 1------------------------------------------------ ----1 a . 46 ak I SR 1 3200 1 1 1226 1 0.38 • I Zf 11461 0-461 IS 1 1434-1 I EL I I I I I & 0 1 1 1' 1 1 ------------- --------------I ET I I I I I I I I I I _ --------- ------ -------1 ER I I I I I I I I I I 1 I----------------------- -------- ------------------ WL 1600 1 1 247 0.15 1 1 0 1 1 1 I i-----------------i------------------------------ ---------—------- - -- ----- ----------I 1815 1 ...... ......_. 4800 --------- I---.-68-) 0.39 --- -------------- 5 -- - 411II 2 0•14 WR I 1 0 16 I O I G� _______________ ___________i' --------- ----------------------------------------- (EXISTING 0.84 I 1 1---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I j. 0:- I 1 1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -----I ' 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. I -....I). 0}I 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greeter than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be _ less then or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project ......................................................... Description of system improvement: PROJECT • FORM II ' BR4175PM ' S1] 1 ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection JAMBOREE RD/BRISTOL ST N (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average winter/Spring 19 8Q AM ' Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2�, Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' I Northbound 8819 t1 g� 2g qg 919 52 Southbound 8 26 10 ' Eastbound j ' Westbound _— IpI Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ' Peak 2P2 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. Ce ff--� _ LLG, laVi—H G-- DATE: �� A►�P� PE't PROJECT: FORM I III '� 1'•. BR4190AM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: BRISTOL STREET NORTH 8 JAMBOREE ROAD 4190 - EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING_- ._--• - -1989 AM ----------------------------------------------------------••-------_--_ - I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTiNGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI ' IMovement, Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVoluine I V/C I I ICapacity,Capacity) Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume ,w/o Project, I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I i--------------------------------------------•------------------------------------------- I NL , 1600 , , 1253 I 0.78 - ___...-_I i - I I I ----------. --- I NT I N.S. I ] 17721 I I I___.___.___1 1 I __ --------------- MR I N.G. , I 1208 I I I__---_----.__--._-----------_- I _ SL I I I I I I I I I I ' •----------'•---------------••-------- -------I I I---sR--> 6400 I--^----i"-_32G ? 0.12 i----^'-I---•---'-i----'------'-"---'I-'--- - ' I ------ -------I EL I I I I I I I I ] 1 N -------------------------------------------------------------- ------ /.}------------ ,' I ET I I I I I I ------•---I--------------- ERI I I ----------------------------------------------•---•----I- i ' I uL I i I I I I I -------------- --. I �...uT ..i__..__._i_ I I I I I I I I 'mr,awf i----------•----•---•--------------------•-------•----••-------------'----- •---•-----I ]EXISTING - , 0.90 ] I I---------------------------------------------------------------------•------ ] ' ]EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I._--_ --__I __ __ ___ i--------------------------------------------------------- - _- IEXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. ] ------------- • ---.-----._-_--_------.----_-- ----_---- -- •-•-'-'-_- ,_I Projected-+_projeei traffic I.C.U. will be less than_or_equal to 0.90 i=] Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 ,_, Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal 110 0.90 ]_] Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project ----------- '--'------ ------------ Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM 11 6 � ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMROREE RD/BRISTOL ST NO ' (Existing Traffic Vol—um-e-s—based on Average inter pring g 89 PM ' Peak 21. Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2)1 Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 6866 ) 69 114 2 9614 01 i 20 Southbound 4154 1•1• 2, 16g , 46 ' Eastbound i Westbound Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. ra W. AtaAelp DATE: I', ' PROJECT: FORM I 1 OR4190PM 1 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS 1 INTERSECTION: BRISTOL STREET NORTH & JAMBOREE ROAD 4190 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING _- ---------_ . )989 PM .... .. IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI 1 IMoyementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVolume I WC I 1CapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I volume Iw/o Projectl I Ratio I Volume I I 1 -----------------------------I--------I------------------------- 1 IN NT I N.S. I I 19ag I I I I I I I MR I I I I I I I I. I I ------ ------- SL I I I I i I I 1 i I I I I � ------------ -------- _ ------------------------------------'_ ------- -------I I sT 1 1 1189 I I I I I I I 6400 --•-------------- ) 0.32 --------i--___----------------'-------I- SR 1 I 1 -----I I EL I I I I I I I I I I 1 ET I I I I I I I ---_ ! I I __________________________________________________ ER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 WL I I I I I I ------------------------------ I WT I I I I I I I I I I _______________________________________________________________________ WR I I I I I I I I I i ----------------------------------------------------- (EXISTING 1 0•86 1 ____ 6 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I -_-_I -------•__-_________ ________________________ -________-_____ 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U-------------- ---- _'•-_-_•--_I- 1_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less then or equal to 0.90 1 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be Less than or equal to 0.90 1CI Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project 1 Description of system improvement: 1 PROJECT FORM II 1 BR4190PM 1 � D ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection BRISTOL ST/CAMPUS DR—IRVINE AV (Existing Traffic Volumes basedon verage Inter pring 9 89 AM ' Peak 2-Ig Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected in of Projected Project Direction Peak 2;1 Hour Growth Peak 211 Hour Peak 2)1 Hour Peak 2: Hour Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume I Ig ' Northbound 4027 ,�j`2.2 S ' Southbound 987 2— Eastbound 7271 ©- 3 3 t Westbound -- ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: Ate 1@1 ' PROJECT: FORM I BR4155AM ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION BRISTOL STREET 8 CAMPUS DRIVE/IRVINE AVENUE 4155 1989 AM EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING ------------------------------------------------------'__..---------------------------------- I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI ' IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I I ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I i I I I volume I I I NL .'_.___.__I_______.i__.__._.L I___- .__�......__.I I•--•---I_._.__-I -------------------------------------------------- I NT 1 4800 I I 1157 1 0.24 * I 'I'-'--'--'-'I-------I------- I NR, I 1600 I I 618 1 0.39 I I 1 ----- ---1- I -------------- I SL I 1600 I I 89 1 0.06 * I I I I L--'-'---.....___I'--'---'----- --0.08 1 _ --- I ST I 4--- 381 1 I --- I ---- I I i I I I I SR I I I I I I I ... NIA -----------------I 1457 0.46-------------- EL I 3200 I I I I ' I ---------------I-------- --•--- -------------------------- ET II I 3200 ** I 1553 0.49 * II I I I I I __ __ __ ..--'•-------------------------I I ER 1 1600 I I 409 I 0.26 I I I I I ------•----------------------------•--------------•---------------------I ' I- WL I I I I I I I I uT I I I i i I I-----------I -------I- I wy .: WRI I I I I I_____.___I_.__.___. ----_--I I..------•-------' (EXISTING __________________________i_ ___ ( 0.79 1 (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. i - -- I_ - _ _ - -------------___ (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. --- -- -- - -I --_.-i ' ** Assumes no thru traffic in optional lane I_I Project + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be _ less than or equal to 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project ' Description of system improvement: FORM 11 PROJECT i lr 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST/CAMPUS DR—IRVINE AV (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 t39_) 1'M ' Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regidnal Projects Projected 1� of Projected Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2), Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2�, Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume I Northbound 2203 �� 2 '�'s Southbound '4196 © 6 3 6 S S' l6 ' Eastbound 5341 6164 t 62 i i ' Westbound -- —_-- Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 23-4 Hour Traffic Volume ' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. OTT fR a C. d ktGtN+x N C' DATE: I D AJA ' PROJECT: FORM I ' IC I BA4155PM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION BRISTOL STREET 8 CAMPUS DRIVE/IRVINE AVENUE 4155 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING ----- - _- -_-1' n PM _.-----•---•--------------------------•--•--•----_•------------.-"- - I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio lVotume I V/C I I [capacitylcopacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume [w/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I I NL I i I I I ---I---------I----------- -_-- i I HT 1 4800 1 1 618 1 0.13 1 1 1 1 1 1 I--------"-------------------•----...--------------------------------------- -I MR. 1 1600 1 1 315 1 0.20 1 1 1 1 1 1' •- -- St. 1 1600 1 1 155 1 0.10 1 I 1 1 1 1 ------------- ST 1 4800 1 1 1367 1 0.28 * I. I I ----I---_--•I --- •- ' SR 1 I I I I I •"-----------"------- I I EL�__- _-1-_-2400 1 1 534 1 0.22 1 1 1 1 1 1 -------------- ---------------I ET I ---- I I ---- [ ---- I 1 1 1 1 I --------------------------••-" ER 1 1600 1 1 721 1 0.45 * I I I I I .._.....----•----•----•----•--------------------------------------------- ---- -------I WL I I I I I I I I I I ,. -•---....---••--•"------------------------------- ---- I ur i 1 I I I I _._.--•-•-----------"-----"----------- I _ ' 1 -- I I i I I I I I I I __________________________________________________________________________I 1EXISTING 1 0.73 1 1 1----•"-----------------•"""--.._-""---•--------•----•--------•---•""-------- I ' [EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I -_-- -----I_-- •--- ----- _ -_-.-_--_ 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. I ----.-.--•-----""--•------"""-••---"••"•"---••-------"-"--••""---.--------------------------- 1_1 Project + project traffic I.C.U. wilt be less than or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. Witt be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements Witt be less than I.C.U. without project -----"- --- -- -----• ----------- ^.. Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM 11 ' I � 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST/BIRCH ST (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19og AM Peak 236 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected In of Projected Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2;1 Hour Peak 2+a Hour Peak 22 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' 3 Northbound g76 O" G Southbound 633 0- • e� ' Eastbound 4365 SZ Westbound Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' ® Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. U m, d lUnnhh DATE: )0 1�Na} Q9 tPROJECT: JJ FORM I BR4160AM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: BRISTOL STREET 8 BIRCH STREET 4160 EXIST-TRAFFIC VOLUMES-BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY-TRAFFIC --__ -WINTER/SPRING ----_ ..... 1989 AM. IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I I ICapacitylCapacityl Volume i Ratio i Volume i Volume iw/o `roe I I Project i I I ectI Ratio 1 I --- ----------------------------------------- ' I NL I I I I i I I I I I ________ ___________________i l 455 i---- ---!- 15 1�- 0,34J ---------- - - 1---------) 1600 ------------------ 0.33 I ' I NR I I 74 ---•-- I I t36 I p• 08 i sL i ,boo l I 98 I 0.06 * I 3$ I !g i 0 081 0 I--- ------------------ -- --- ST I 3200 i i 161 i 0.05 l I S� 1 ►6C O.K1 4 144-6- 1 0 , 05 1------------------------------------------------ - ----------------- ----F?� i I SR I I i I I I I I i I ---i EL 1600 929 - ' I--- ------ +w •--'--I- -- ----0.58 " 1., 1 33Z. 112571 0.}b1 ag 1 124+1 ----------- -- 1023 I 13oZ3 113.4E o'4sl o i 134C� 0, 4 ' ........) 3200 ---------'--------) 0.35ER 1 ---- 103 I 1 0 I f03' I I toi 1 -------------------- --------------------- - -------------- I WL I I I 1 I I I I I --- -------------------- l WT I I I I I I I I I uR i I I I I I I I I I - ------I IEXISTING ------------- - I- 0.97 I 1 . (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 1 .2.0 I I -------------- I (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.---_•------- - --- --- - •.1 1.2-31 ------------------------------ -----_ "* Assumes no through traffic in left lane I_l Project + project traffic I.C.U. Will be less than or equal to 0.90 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be ' less than or equal to 0.90 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project -------------------------'•--------------------------- ' Description of system improvement: �lQ o(�e cfn kuwa ktr to L 89 FORM II PROJECT 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST BIRCH ST (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Inter pring 9 89 PM Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected In of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2)k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume li ) Northbound 379 0. a � 00 Southbound 1464 Q` . SS St l 6 30 ' Eastbound 3723 0 46o 46 2-0 i Westbound -- � Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' ® Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. cu'd DATE: IO ' PROJECT: FORM I BR4160PH ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: BRISTOL STREET & BIRCH STREET 4160 ' EXIST-TRAFFIC-VOLUMES-BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC-" WINTER/SPRING- ---- -" 1989 PM IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTjPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVolume I V/C I I ICapacitylcapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Projectl l Ratio I I I I I I I, I I Volume i I I I 1 I I _' ' I----- ------- I I I I I I I I NT 1 1 152 1 I 15� I�bT �•j�.�--T------- - 2 ' I-------- 1600 i_________________3 0.11 *--- -_._____ .__. I d ( 2f a1�l 21 I I i 176I 0.11 * 1 J lI �^ 1 rob O,W O 0 , 13 ---------- -------- ------I'- ST ' I 3200 l ( 583 I 0.18 I I 7 I �o o ____I_ 'S' I-6b3-I 1 ---------- SR I I I I 1 061. 1 1 I i EL 1 1 274 1 1332 I (�06 1 ------------------ --- _---------- i I ET 4800 1 1 1241 0.34 * 13�3 I iS6¢ a4V !15'641 41 - ---• I ER ) 1 1 115 ) 1 1 Q i-i- ---*11 ' l i7 1 11S~ ------------------' -_-•-- ---------------I uL I I I ' ---------------------------------•-------------------- I WT I I I I I I I I I WR1 1 _______i________i_-______-________i_--------- ____________________I ' 1 ------- 1 EXISTING _ _______________________I" ---- I _______________ (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I O.'+S I -I (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT-I.C.U. IO. 7-1 -----------------------------------------------------________________________________________ Project + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. WILL be greater than 0.90 1_i Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement Will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project ' Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM 11 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/BRISTOL ST (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average winter/spring 9 89 AM ' Peak 21, Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 211 Hour Growth Peak 2)1 Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 231 Hour Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume I ' Northbound 5669 5 $erg`( 6(0 6 I 5-2- Southbound 830 r7 p u 16 19 Eastbound 6335 0' • O r<a S� 6 ' Westbound —� Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ' . Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. ' i�lf�✓ DATE: tO ' PROJECT: FORM I �I C. BR417OPH ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: BRISTOL STREET & JAMBOREE ROAD... 4170-_INTER____ ___________ _________ __ EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED,ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC HINTER/SPRING 1989 PM I ..IEXISTINGIPRDPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI R I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I IMovenMntl Lanes I Lanes I PK N ICapacitylCspacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/V `rectl i Ratio II I -------------"------------------------------I--------------•------------I NLI I I I----------------------------------------------------------_ - I ' ........) 8000 i--•-------•---_0) 0.25 i--._____i_________i i ___________ _______i_______I I-------•--------- -----I - SL I I I I I I I I I 1 --------------- ------------------------------------- I ST I 4800 I ( 1256 I 0.26 * I --------------------------------------------I___._I I I SR I I I I I I I I •I-------_II -•--___ --- -._.--- -_._. - 672 1 I 1 -- ") 3200 I--------- ) 0.33 ---- ---------- I ET I I 368 I I I I I I I--- - .._ ' i ER l3200 I I 1230 I 0.38 * I I I I ____________________________________ I WL I I I I I I I I I --------------- ---' I WT I I I I I I I__.. I I i WRI I__________________________-________-_________-___________-_______� I (EXISTING .__.. - I 0.64 I (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I_-.-__- ___I _ __. _ _ _____ IEXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. I I --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I_I Project + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U.- will be greater than 0.90 1_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be — less then or equal to 0.90 III Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project Description of system improvement: FORM 11 PROJECT OR417OPH ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection JAMBOREE RD/BRISTOL ST (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Average Winter/Spring Itf 89 PM Peak 2> Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 211 Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2), Hour Peak 2y Hour Pea Voluk lu Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume me ' I Northbound 5141 �• 5^� j 6 6 z08 f 46 Southbound 248 029- 99' 3}30.1 3 �� Eastbound 4923 Ej` V4 ' 62 i 0 i Westbound -- ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected YJ Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22,Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. ' DATE: ' PROJECT: FORM I OR4170AN INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: BRISTOL STREET 8 JAMBOREE ROAD 4170 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC MINTER/SPRING 1989 AM ...I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIE%ISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I I ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Projectl I Ratio I ' I I I I I I I I_ volume -._. ._.-------------------------- NL i i I 1 I 1 I 1 I I --------------------- --- I HT I 1 1 2840 1 1 1 1 _._._._...1. 1 1 I------- *------------------- ---'•-------- I NR i 1 1 41 I 1 1 1 1 1 --------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------I ' I SL l I I I I 1 I I l-.. ----I I ST 1 4800 1 1 427 1 0.09 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ' I SR l I I I i I i ----------- I I - I NIA ' ) 3200 ' 03BET 223 I I I I I1 I .. ' --- _..1I i ER I 3200 1 1 1473 1 0.46 * I I I I 1 ' i---------•------------------•--------------------- -----' ---1 WL I I I I I I I .__._.._..I.__.___I . ---- 1 I ' WT I 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ---'- WR i I I I I 1 1-------------------- lE%(STING I I..........................i 0.62 l I 1---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I___..------I- I I--------- -------------- -- (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. ............ I- I 1_1 Project + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater then 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems Improvement will be ' less than or equal to 0.90 1__1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will ' be less than I.C:U. without project ........................... Description of system improvement: ' PROJECT FORM 11 ' 3� ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/EASTBLUFF DR—UNIVERSITY DR ' — (Existing Traffic Volumes___-based on verage Inter pring 19 89 AM Peak 2� Hour Approved ' Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 21k Hour Growth Peak 211 Hour Peak 2)1 Hour Peak 21; Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 4304_ 271- 6-221 $Z S2 Southbound 4861_ �'�• 21:1 ' Eastbound 917 160 10:^i 0 Westbound 1858 ( 1"60 �q 0 ` -- -- - - Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ' Pul Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization 40 (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. ' __ DATE: 0 PROJECT: d A FORM I _y 1 JA4765AM 1 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS 1 INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD 6 EASTBLUFF DRIVE NDRTH/UNIVERSITY DRIVE 4765 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1989 AM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI 1 IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Project) I Ratio I I I I I I I I I VOLUMa I I I I--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---1 1 I NL 1 1600 1 1 a 1 0.01 1}j. 0 .2 1 to 0,011 0 1 (� I I------------------------------------------------ w 1 - -- f 1 NT 1 48001 1 17831 0.37 *11. �8�_A0 � 0_441_Zto1;A-QH 0 144- ------------------------------------------------ NR 1 1600 1 i 245 1 0.15 11.1, I 10 1 OIr1 0 1 A4;} 1 1------------------------------------------------------------------ SL 1 1600 1 1 108 1 0.07 *1.1 ' I----------------------------------------------- I 1 ST I 4800 I ( 1831 1 0.38 1 1.1• it 1 -4OO I/ +� U_A� J 1� � o 4 ----------------------------------------------- SR I 1600 I I 189 1 0.12 1JJ Z 1 a Q 1;1,2 0.131 1 ----------- 1 i EL 1 1 368 1 1 S� I e�af 041 O 149!r I 0'(S 7 3200 ------------------? 0.13 *--- ---------------------I I ET 1 1 59 I 1 0 151 1 0 1 Sq 1 I------------------------------------------------ -------------------- -------------- I ER I N.S. 1 1' 4 1 I -0, I 92,3 I a� D I IZ�' {_ ._-- I WL 1 1 435 1 1 1 14-U 0:lzI__�__I A-361 1 i--------> 4800 I--------I--------) 0.12 *-- ------------------- I 0 12 129-.-.------L-- 1 0 1 MI 1 0 1 121 I -----I 1 i WR I N.S. 1 1 3771 ' I 1 0 1,3-+ 1 p 134.4.1 '---------- -------------------- ---------------------1 I EXISTING.-__•.•••..•---------------I- 0.69 I I i (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I O • p u -------------------•-----.--._-p-.�•1 (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.•-__ --•----•-- ..........I 0_6 1-i .............••_....•._..---•...-•--..-----------_..---' Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be Less than or equal to 0.90 1 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 1 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project -'-•----------------------•.•....•---------------------------------...------------------- 1 Description of system improvement: 1 to R w� 1 PROJECT FORM II ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/EASTBLUFF DR—UNIVERSITY DR (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 89 PM ' Peak 2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1%,of Projected Project Direction Peak VolumeHour VGrowth olume Peak VolumeHour Peavolumeour PeaVolume 211 our PeaVolumeour ' Northbound 5043 �•�. 60 9T4 4TI:K 60 I Z� Southbound 6241 M/• sZ. ( R S^ 6 A 6 ' Eastbound 747 Q 3 �Q � O ( 0 Westbound O 63 � ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. �aL OC 22��hum 4- DATE: ( 0 hU5 i t 9 PROJECT: FORM I 1 9 ,: JA4765PM ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & EASTBLUFF DRIVE NORTH 4765 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1989 PM - -------------- ' I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIE%ISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDIPROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI ' (Movement Lanes I Lanes ( PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio JVoLume ( V/C ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 1w/o Project I Ratio Volume I I NL 1 1600 ,1 1 14 1 0.01 1 1 1 1 1 1 -- - ' _--NT- 1 4800 1 1 1637 1 0.34 * I I I I I.____---•---•---••---•-------------------••---•----•----•••- •-- -------I NR 1 1600 1 1 401 1 0.25 1 1 11- 1 1 __--___--_. ______________I ' I SL 1 ---- ( --- ---- --------- ----------I- * - I ST ( 4800 1 1 2168 1 0.45 1 1 1 1 1 1 •_-SR---�-._1600-'^--_---'__--b35•'••-0 40- ---...--'--....---I--•----^--I'--'---I-------� �r EL I 231 --- 3200 ------------------3, 0.10 *----------------------------------------------I ET 1 1 75 1 1 1 1 1 •------------ ---•--• -------I j-- ER --f--'N.s. 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I----------------------•-I--•-----•-•---•----•---------------••---•----•----•------------•I ---- �---------- ( ----------- 106 I I I ._--•-----•------- -------- • WR I N.S. 1 1 262 1 1 1 1___________1_ 1 ----'.....................i- --------------� ]EXISTING 0.80 (EXIST +,REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I ----------I_______________i' 1E%ISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL- .GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. �------------- --- ---------- - __-.-__� 1_1 Projected + project traffic wit be less than or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement Witt be ' — less than or equal to 0.90 1_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project :......................................... Desert ption-Of system improvement: PROJECT FORM 11 1% Traffic Volume Analysis intersection JAMBOREE RD/BISON AV ' (Existing Traffic Volumes Based on verage Inter pring 9 89 AM Peak 2� Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 231 Hour Growth Peak 21� Hour Peak 2+s Hour Peak 21, Hour Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 4641 _- I Sr6 5 Southbound 4 010 T I 1 Q"g !d ' Eastbound 317 _ _ 0 ' I 3 C a 6 Westbound 513 Q ! 56 2 ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume Q Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 21k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. t64• LC Ol A401AW&RA L� DATE: to PROJECT: FORM I 3v A JA4870AM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & BISON STREET 4870 ' EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1989 AM -••...........................................'...---...----...___.___...__...__..._..---.... ' I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I WC I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I i ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Project I Ratio I ' ---------------------------------------I------------------I --tuna.----------I-------I I NL I 1600I I 18I 0.01I ► I I I I _-_ I._.NT ----"'---.L._"-'-1 ' 2113 -------' 'I`"'--'-'I'--""-'I"---'-'--'''-"'--!..__.__I NR _) 480D ------------------) 0.45 I I i I I I 67 -----------------•--••-._._..-•------•---------•-----'--I I SL I I I 95 I * I I I I . . ---- . ---- __._. . . ________..I_ " i S 4800 1656 0.35 I I I I I I I---•-•------------------•-----------------•-----------------•----•---------------------- I ' I SR I _-1600 I I 28 I 0.02 I I I I I I ---------------------------------------------------------------------•----I I...EL .._. 1 I 72 I I I I I ► N I--------) ----------------- ) .......I I ET 1600 I I 38 0.08 * I I .____..-_.I_ I I ------------I ER ) I I 25 I I I I I I I.__..------•-----------------------------------•---------._.------------------------•------I ' I WL I 1600 I I 93 I 0.06 * I I I I - --------------------------__ .-- _-------------------`---------------- I VT I 1600I I 43I 0.03I I I I I 1 ' I---------------------------------------------------------------- --- I I WR I 3200 I I 101 I 0.03 I I I I 1 I --------------------------------------------•--------I (EXISTING..........................'I 0.62 I I __------------ (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 1.C.U. I _-_I ______________ ' (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. _I I -------------•-.-_-__.-•_- --------------••_.-.__--. I_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be Less then or equal to 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will ' be less than I.C.U. without project Description of system improvement: ' PROJECT FORM 11 t 7j d 'I ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis dntersection JAMBOREE RD BISON AV ' (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Inter pring 19 89) PM Peak 22 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 22 Hour Growth Peak 2)1 Hour Peak 22 Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 22 Hour 'I Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 4255 t• , 42 Southbound 4826 60R o 24 Eastbound 216 ' Westbound 580 �— -- -- Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. ' woe Rea-ikGlyl Al- DATE: PROJECT: FORM I C I JA4870PM � ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & BISON STREET 4870 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1989 PH ............................................................................................- I, IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio JVoLume I V/C ICapacitylcapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 1w/o Project) I Ratio Volume L----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------I NL 1 1600 1 ( 35 1 0.02 * � � I ---------------I I Nr... _.._....__._I 1 1889 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' I-------) 4800 ------------------ ) 0.42 i------------------------------i-------i-------I -----------------------I ' SL 1 3200 1 1 117 1 0.04 ( 1 1 1 1 1 ----------------------I ST 1 4800 1 ( 2150 1 0.45 *-------.I �-.-_----.--� � � -------- ---------------I ' SR 1 /N---- 69 ---- ( -------- I........) ------------------) ------------------------ ---I ' ET 1600 1 1 33 0.05 * I I I I I ER--) ------------------------------I 13 - -------- --------------------- I WL 1 1600 1 1 94 1 0.06 *-.--__--I �--_-.----__�- -----I WT 1600 49 0.03 1 1 1 1_.__-.-1. ------ -. _-_---I I-------------------------- ------------------- WR 1 3200 1 1 62 1 0.02 1 1 -.-__-__-.-�_ --------- �E%ISTlNG __________________________i 0.58 � -------- EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I_-.--------I --------------- I -------------------------------------------' 1E%ISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. ----------I-_--_--� 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to o.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM II ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BL/BISON AV ' (Existing Traffic Volumes 6asecJ—on v�1 erag Win er pangjAM ' Peak 2� Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2)1 Hour Growth Peak 2h. Hour Peak 2)g Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 24 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume I Northbound 7508 5Y, ,,5 574r S' .34 S Southbound 4883 JaZ .S6r �6 to ' Eastbound 465 0 66 53 I Westbound Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. �+/fi C? OC /"c-wt/uGtvlC►tt DATE• D ( g• ' PROJECT: FORM I ' MA4995AN ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD i BISON AVENUE 4995 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1989 AM .............•-----.._.....------....'---------........._........__...._._...-__--.-_ - I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVolume I V/C I I ICapacitylCapecityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Project) I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I I I--------------------------------------•------------------------------------ I I NL I 1600 I I 198 I 0.12 I I I I I I........................................................................................... I NT I 3200 I I 3111 I 0.97 * I I I I I MR I I I D I I I II I 1 --- ------i -- BL---I--------I--------I--------I--------I--------I---------I .-__..._.. .`------^-------------------I I ST 1 6400 1 1 1987 I 0.31 I I I I I I i------------------------------------------------- ..-.._..-------I SR I M.S. I I 238I I I I I I 1 ' -------------------------••-------------------------------------------r--------------I I EL I 3200 I I 95 I 0.03 * - I I Ir_ I I ------ ....'.r.•-I �- -ET.-i'-'.-.-'i' I I I I I I I ( ' (--•---•----••----•_-•--•-----------------••--------•--_------- -------.-r-- I. ER I M.S. I I 115 I I I I I . I I I --------------------------------------------------------- ----- r. .,r-.----I I WL I I I I I I I I I i '. _-- ^...I-. .---I--._.-.----..-__.-----------------.i.__.---.-I ..... ... ............r,. I------------------------------------- _.,.....................•.......-I ' I WR I I I I I I I I I 1 IEXISTING i ---- I_______________________________ IEXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I ---.------I ._-_•- -------- IEXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. I I .......................................'..._.-_.....---'--..---------......._......._........ I_I Project + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 II Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project ..............................` ' Description of system improvement: ' PROJECT FORM 11 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BL/BISON AV ' (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 89) RM Peak 2� Hour Approved ' Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 21* Hour Peak 21* Hour Peak 2h HoPr Peak 24 Hayr Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 4472 — ,S! I g 91 S2 southbound 42 I ' Eastbound 943 _ !to g Westbound ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2�2 Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 21-2Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. ATE: � PROJECT: �— r FORM I MA4995PM ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD $ BISON AVENUE 4995 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING _--.__--..--1989 PM _________________________________________________________________________ ----- ' I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI, IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVolume I V/C I ICapecitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volune I Volume Iw/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I votune -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I NL I 1600 I I 118 I 0.07 I I I __._.._-.•.................................................................................I NT I 3200 I I 1847 I 0.58 * I I I ------------------.----------------_-----------------....._- --------•--."--.----'•I MR - I I I I I I I __.".,_..I. i '-------------I St. I I I I I I I I I ----------------------------------------------------------------'._..---"-............_...I ST I 6400 I 1 2905 I 0.45 ( I I ) I ------------------------------------------------- ............ ' SR'._ - N.B. 97 I I EL I 3200 I I 232 I 0.07 *..,..___I--'- .__-----__� I ( �' ET I I I I I I I I ...................r_ ER I N.S. I I . 132 I I 1 I---------------------------------------------1 I --------------- WL I I I I I I I . I I 1 .--- -----.-••----*I I WT I I I I I -----------------------------I I .w►w ...r�.......-_.I I WR I I I I I i I I I I I------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------i (EXISTING I 0.65 I 1---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U.-.I.-_-.-•..--I ..•.- ---------- (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. I I ................. I_I Project + project traffic I.C.U. WILL be less than or equal to 0.90 ' I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. wilt be greater than 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be ' _ less than or equal to 0.90 i_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements wilt be less than I.C.U. without project Description of system inprovement: PROJECT FORM 11 ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection• JAMBOREE RD/EASTBLUFF DR—FORD RD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 9 89 AM ' Peak 2)1 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected In o72� H ted Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2y Hour Peak 21, Hour Pear Peak 2;1 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' I Northbound 5878 fj " T sOL Southbound 3442 t� 3� 6 ' t33 I i ' Eastbound 1289 0 33 13zz i 13 1 ' Westbound 908 — 03 t I Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' Q Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. yl71 OC AtO4Ay."Ka DATE: AAYI PROJECT: FORM I 1 JA4980AM ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & EASTBLUFF DRIVE/FORD ROAD 4980 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1989 AM _-----_-------_-------_-----____-------_-----_-------_____-------------______________....____ IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI ' IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR ( V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVOlume ( V/C iCapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 1w/o Project) I Ratio ' ! Volume I I -_____- --------I•------•--•-•------------•----------•-----••--•-----•-- -- NL------ 3----1 --------1 ----------635 1 ---- - NT 2401 1 1 1 ( 1 I----- --) 4800 i--------I________) 0.51 *______________________________________________I ----•-- 54----------!--------I--------------------------------•----� SL 1 1600 1 1 38 1 0.02 * I I I � ' ___ -__-__. _._--_. ST 1 4800 1 1 1468 1 0.31 1 1 1_-.___-_-__1 1 __--•----------� 160D - SR ---- 16 -----------------------------------•-------------- I NIA EL 1 1600 1 1 181 1 0.11 1 1 1 1 1 -------------� ET----_------------•-----•----- I__ 0---*-----•----•-----•----•--------'-------I------- � ER 1 1600 1 1 318 ( 0.20 ' �-----------•---- -------- -----------------------•-------•------•-----••------------•--•--�( ' ' 79 1 1 1 1 - �---uT--) 4800 ------------------ ) 0.10 i----'---I---------I-----------'----•--'--•----I WR ( 1600 1 1 92 1 0.06 1 1 ( 1 1 ----•--------•---'•---•� 1----------------------------------------------- ---------•----•----•-------- 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I --------- I -__.._ 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. � .___ ------- ------- _____________________________________---- ._____-- �_� Projected + project_traffic_I.c.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90__--------- �J Projected + project traffic I.C.U. Will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be Less than or equal to 0.90 t1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less then I.C.U. without project __-•--•-------•----•---•--•---------------------------•--- ' Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM 11 ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis intersection JAMBOREE RD/EASTBLUFF DR—FORD RD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 _) PM, Peak 2� Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Projected Project Direction Peak 211 Hour Growth Peak 2;1 Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 5515 _ 11• 6 T;Z 63 ,13 64 e? o Southbound 4741 1 * p 961 60 46 Eastbound 1461 _ 0 t O 14 `' S� Westbound 786 0 8'a3 I 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. t DATE• j0 Ake l ' PROJECT: ��� c FORM I JA496OPH ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD 3 EASTBLUFF DRIVE/FORD ROAD 498D EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING ---.-•-----1989 PM. .......................................................................... IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPRQJECTIPROJECTI 1 (Movement) Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio lYolump I V/C I I ICapacitylCopecityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 1w/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I I I------------•----•--•----------------•---•---------------------I---------•-'-------i-------I I NL 1 3200 1 1 467 1 0.15 " I-----------------i--------I--------------•--i--------I•--------'-•----•-•--I•T•.._.'.......i 1 1811 ' I--------) 4800 ------------------) 0.40 ------------------------------------------•----I I NR 1 1 115 1 1 1 1 1 I 1_______________________ • __.__-__-_________1 1 SL 1 16001 1 791 0.051 1 1 1 1 I I---------------------------------------------------------------------•---•---• 1 ST I 4800 1 1 2152 1 0.45 * 1 1 i 1 I ,----•----.i SR 1 1600 1 1 42 1 0.03 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ,r•------• I 1 EL 1 16001 1 461 0.031 1 I I I I - --_-___---- i________-____;�i-_------*_____---------------------------------------- ET 1 1600 0.11 1 - ---------- ---------------- ------- i--------�---------I,. ..... ER 1 1600 1 ( .'.......L,... .' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 -) 4800 - -) 0.06 *- 'I I WT 1 1 176 1 1 1 i I I I----------•------------------------------------••--------•---------•----..--.-___f.........l 1 WR 1 16001 1 281 0.021 1 1 1 1 I ________ __________________________-_. ---- ___________________-__________--____-,_____-__ 1 i 1-------------------•-----------------------•----------•---------------• ..._ (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I I -_--• i--•----------------------------•---------------•------------------•----- -_ ---•---- 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. - I- I ___-------------------------------------- _---------------------------- -------- ------ ....... 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less then or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project -----•- --- -• ------ ----•------ T - Description of system improvement: III ' PROJECT FORM 11 I 21 p ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BL/FORD RD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring TT-8- AM ' Peak 2� Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects ProEHour 1% of ProjectedTPeparkOR:1tio7ur Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 211 Hour [Peak Peak 24 Hour Volume Volume Volume Vo Volume Volume ' Northbound 6101 Q 7-1 ( 1 S2_ southbound 4346 IT O2� 4 1 d SO t 0 Eastbound 472 0 Q Q�}2 Westbound 2268 D 9443 ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 21k Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 21-, Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. ' Peo,,AUM4 tA DATE: /d PROJECT: •; r A FORM 1 1 NA4985AN ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD 8 FORD ROAD 4985 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1989 AM ..................................................._......................................... ' I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I I 1Capacity1Capacity1 Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Projectl I Ratio 1, I I I I I I I I volume 1, 1 1 I-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I i NL 1 3200 1 1 96 1 0.03 1 1 i____ 1 1 1 I NT I 480D 1 1 2498 1 0.52 ■ I I I I I--------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------• I MR I N.S. 1 1 171 1 1 I I_ I I '_______________________ ________-____- ' I SL 1 3200 1 1 219 1 0.07 + I I ______-•--I- I I _____________1 i sT 1 48001 1 16291 0.341 1 1 1 1 i------------•---------------------------------------•----------------------------------- I �n ' l SR l N.S. I I 49 I I 1 1 � 1 I -------------------------------------------- _ N _____._____1 l EL 1 3--- l I 21 I ---- * ___--__I_ 1 --------------------------I i ET 1 3200 1 1 146 1 0.05 1 1 1 1 1 1 ______ i ER 1 16001 1 761 0.051 1 - I I I I ' I---------------•-----••---------------------•---•-------•--•------•----------------• i 1 WL 1 16001 1 141 0.011 1 1 1 1 1-----------_--------------------- ---------I--•-----`-••-----------------_I--- 1 - --1 i -------) 480o i--•----'i--•_-•--) 0.26 i------•-i----•----i-----------------------•--- eat ------------------------•--- ....1 (EXISTING ..........................i- 0.86 l I 1•---------•-----------•---•---------•----••--•----------•---------------•--- (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1I _--_--_-_ I-----------------____________________________________________-_ ----•------ ___-_ (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. ............I I 1_1 Project + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.c.U. w/systems improvement will be _ less than or equal to 0.90 (_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be leas than I.C.U. without project Description of system improvement: ' PROJECT FORM 11 ' J 1 I ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ,intersection 14ACARTHUR BL FORD RD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 89) M - Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Projected Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2)1 Hour Peak 2)j Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 211 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 4384 Ste'/. 546 041 S� Za Southbound $3 - I 6 Eastbound 842 _ 34 gt.g ( D Westbound 1007 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected •� Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. ' LQ fCLGtNItdt.0 DATE: I o Ak o'19 PROJECT: 3••� C. FORM I KA498SPH INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: NACARTHUR BOULEVARD i FORD ROAD 4985 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING--------------1989 PM ....................................................•-•--------_ . .. I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio 1Volume I V/C i ICapecitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 1w/o Projectl I Ratio I 41 I 1 - - . Volume I I I __...... ...._.._ ....-----...__...--._^..... .......................•---I I WL I 320D 1 1 63 1 0.02 1 1 1 1 1 i I HT I 4WD I 1 1833 1 0.38 * I I ......_...I I I I NR I N.S. 1 1 221 1 1 1 1 1 1 i..................................................•----------..__...__._._----•--- --I SL 1 3200 1 1 678 1 0.21 * I I I I I ' .•^'.......-^---•------•----.......--•--------------------------•-•-'__...._..-------I ST 1 4800 1 1 2372 1 0.49 1 1 1 1' 1 1 ...........................•----^-_.__._.-----__.••---__.^---------------•-----------^----•1 i SR I N.S. I I -- I I I i ------------ I 1 !7 I EL 1 3200 1 1 38 1 0.01 *.__...__I (__._....._.! I I -----------------------------------•-------- ----•---- ----^----------1 ' I ET 1 3200 1 1 203 1 0.06 1 1 1 1 1 1-------------------7----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 ER 1 1600 1 1 79 1 0.05 1 1 1_.___.__.._1 1 , 1 I WL 1 16001 1 171 0.011 1 1 -----------------------•----------- . I ----- —--) 4800 i-----•--------- ] 0.08 I--------'---------I-----------'-------I------- I (EXISTING ..............••.-._^.^.-.i 0.68� I._._..-___^-__-•.-'_....__.._...----- I I-.-'^•"---...._.--••.'-•^------•-------------------•-^--------•------•----- 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I I I .__---^----- ^'--------I (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U---------------------^.__..._I i ---- ---------------- _----------------------------------- (a) .01 is concurrent with NL I_I Project + project traffic I.C.U. will be Less than or equal to 0.90 ' I_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be _ less than or equal to 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project Description of system improvement: ' PROJECT FORM II i 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection IRVINE AV/MESA DR ' (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage IFFter pring 989 AM Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2+1 Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2h, Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 5663 62S 0 6.3 L. g Southbound 1727 �•S a' ( e�3 �( gg p� ' Eastbound 377 n i7 Westbound 0 Q R�� 2 217 ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. ' — DATE: /0 A a ' D ' PROJECT: ZJ K FORMI IR4103AM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: IRVINE AVENUE 8 MESA DRIVE 4103 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1989 AM ............................................................................................. I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI ' IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I I ICapecity10apacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I I ' I----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------I l NL I 160D I 1 296 I 0.19 I I I 1 I l I------------------------------------------------------------- -------------I l NT 1 I 2445 I I I . I I ---------- 76 i I I--------------------- I / ' I SL l ---- l I 32 I ---- * I I __________-_ I ____..� / V I ST I I 702 I I I 1 I I 1--------) 3200 ------------------) 0.23 ----------------------------------------------I I SR I I 35 I I I I I I I 1600 ------------------) 0.09 *-----------------"'--------------------------I I ET I I 38 1 I I I 1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 ER I 16001 1 40I 0.03I I I I I I ' I----""-----------------------------------------""'-------------------------------------I I WL I 160D I I 63 I 0.04 * I I I I I I----------------I--------i-----28 ---------I--------i---------I-------------------I-------I I WT ' I--------) 1600 ----------------4) 0.02 '-------'I----------------------------'I-______' I -R (EXISTING -' ----- I______________________________________________ ---------__--- (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. -i______---__I_______________ _____ ' (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. II __________________________ --------------- __ __-_ I_I Project less th n or aqua ' I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be _ Less than or equal to 0.90 I_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U, without project Description of system improvement: III , PROJECT FORM II 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection IRVINE AVENUE/MESA DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 89 PM ' Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 2422 Pry. P 916 -7-4 Southbound 4577 ) S. 69 S / 391 SI 16 Eastbound 467 461' S� O r- O ' Westbound 481 -- � 0 ® Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 23-2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DC A-0" fRlaVGtk.' DATE: ' PROJECT: FORM I IR4103AN INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: IRVINE AVENUE & MESA DRIVE 4103 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 19B9 PM ............................................................................................. ' I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTING►EXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I I 1Capacity►Cepacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 1w/o Projectl I Ratio I ' i --I 1 I I I I ► volume I I I ---- i NL 1 1600 I 1 77 1 0.05 * I I I I I ) 3200 ---------------71 1 I I I I I -) 0.29 -------- '----------------------------------- ►' MR 1 ► 1--------------------------------------------------------•-------•------•----------•--------I ' 1 SL 1 16001 1 61 0.001 1 1 1 1 1 1 --- ----------'--------'-----------•-----I--------I--.--------- ----I I 2085 .I I I I -- •' ------ _---------- . SR 1 1 --- 1 1 I -------•--I I i ► EL 1 1 63 1 1 1 1 1 1 160D - --- ) 0.05 i--------I------•---------------------'I-------' ET i I 23 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ER 1 1600 1 1 146 1 0.09 1 1 1 ! 1_.._._____ 1 WL 1 1600 1 1 229 1 0.14 *----'-'-I I '-------'-I--'----I I -------- ----------- ---•--- 1 WT 1 1 75 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1--------) 1600 ------------------) 0.05 ---------I-------------•-----'•I•-------------- i I-----------•-------------------------------------------------------------------------------I 1EXISTING -------- ---..I- 0-94-I_-_-------••-------- I (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I I I----------•------------------------------•---------------------- -_• -•- - .-_-•------ -._ ' ]EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.•--__- ._•-__--.•--------_•_I 1 ----------------------------------•_•------•__••-------. ---•--- 1_1 Project less th n or equa ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will ' be less than I.C.U. without project Description of system improvement: ' PROJECT FORM It