Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTPO067_FASHION ISLAND TRANS. DEV. RIGHTS TP0067 -CITYOF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 Newport Boulevard-P.O.Box 1768 Newport Beach,CA 92659-1768 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION To: Office of Planning and Research From: City of Newport Beach ❑ 1400 Tenth Street,Room 121 Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard-P.O.Box 1768 Sacramento,CA 95814 Newport Beach,CA 92659-1768 County Clerk,County of Orange (Orange County) FXI Public Services Division P.O.Box 838 Date received for filing at OPR: Santa Ana,CA 92702 Subject: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Name of Project., GPA 90-1(G) ; Amendments No. 701, 721; TPO #67 & 1170; and a Finding of General Plan Consistency State Clearinghouse Number. Lead Agency Contact Person: Telephone No.: / Project Location: 1177 Camelback & 101 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA Amendment of Planned Community Regulations to permit office, Project Description: rather than retail use on PacTel site, on Camelback. Transfer of 13,550 sq.ff. of retail development from PacTel to Newport Center. This is to advise that the City of Newport Beach has approved the above described project on Mom„h i 1 i 991 and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: (Date) 1. The project❑will ® will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. ❑ An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. ® A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures Q were❑ were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A Statement of Overriding Considerations❑was Q was not adopted for this project. 5. Findings® were❑ were not made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at the Planning Department of the City of Newport Beach,3300 Newport Boulevard,Newport Beach, CA�k4 92659-1768;714/644-3225 . 64. GF_rX _ 'I'tcdcF March 12, 1991 Advance Planning Manager Signature Date Title CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAMS CERTIFICATE.OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact. Finding ' •Project• Tit 1o/Location (ipclude county): GPA.90-l(G) ; Amendments No.. 701, 721; TPO #67 & #70; and -a ,Finding of General Plan Consistency ' 1177 Camelback & 101 Newport Center Drive, -Newport Beach; CA Project Description: Amendment of Planned Community Regulations to permit office, rather than retail use on PacTel site, on Camelback. Transfer of 13,550 sq.ft. of retail development from PacTel to Newport Center. Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary) : No significant resources exist on the project sites and therefore no impacts will occur. certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project •wa.11 not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. ! 1 Sandra L. Genis Title: P inc pal Planner Lead Agency City of Newport Beach Date March 15 1991 Section 711.4, Fish and Game Code ' DFG:12/90 L FINR FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS%R GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-1(G) AMENDMENT NO. 721 TRAFFIC STUDY No. 70, FINDING OF GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY AMENDMENT NO. 701 AND TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 67 AS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 11, 1991 A. Environmental Document: Accept the environmental document, malting the following findings: 1. That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and Council Policy K-3. 2. That the contents of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project. 3. That based on the information contained in the initial study, comments received, and all related documents, there is no substantial evidence that the project (as conditioned or as modified by mitigation measures identified in the initial study) could have a significant effect on the environment. B. GPA 90-1 (G) 1. The proposed office use is compatible with the existing land uses in the North Ford Planned Community. 2. Based on information contained in the traffic study which has been performed for development proposed under the proposed amendment, the circulation system will not be adversely affected by the proposed project. C. General Plan Consistengy Determination/Density Transfer 1. A traffic analysis was prepared to assess the impact of the proposed transfer of development, and the traffic analysis indicated that the transfer would not adversely affect the City of Newport Beach traffic system. D. Amendment No. 721, Traffic Study No. 70 Findines: 1. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and provides for land uses compatible with the surrounding area. Final Findings and Condions • Page 2 2. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S4. 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project generated traffic for a general office development will not add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any critical intersection which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of .90 or less. 4. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project generated traffic for a medical office development will be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period at the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and Bison Avenue and the intersection of Jamboree Road and Bison Avenue, and could potentially add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and Bison Avenue. 5. That the Traffic Study suggests circulation system improvements which will improve the level of traffic service to an acceptable level at all critical intersections. 6. That the proposed project, including circulation system improvements will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service on any "major;' 'primary-modified,' or "primary' street. Conditions-, 1. Medical office uses on the Pactel site shall not be certified for occupancy until such time as an additional northbound through lane on MacArthur at Bison is provided. 2. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 3. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, and a watering program designed to minimise the impacts of haul operations. 4. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit. A copy of the plan shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 5. Grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer incorporating the recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil f Final Findings and Conditions • Page 3 and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans shall be furnished to the Building Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. If found necessary by the City of Newport Beach, the project applicant will be required to enter into an agreement and post a bond guaranteeing the repair of the public street system, utilities or other public property that might be damaged during excavation and construction of retaining structures and foundations. 7. Construction activities will be conducted in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code,which limits the hours of construction and excavation work to 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays. Hand excavation activities which involve the use of stone drills, jack hammers, or other similar tools which produce grinding, pounding or other similar loud and pulsating sounds shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 8. A dust control program in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 shall be implemented during excavation and construction. This program shall include such measures as: containing soil on-site until it is hauled away, periodic watering of stockpile soil, and regular vacuum sweeping of streets used for the haul operation to remove accumulated material. 9. The lighting system for the proposed developments shall be designed in a manner so as to conceal the light source and minimise light and glare to the nearby residential properties on the northeasterly side of Camelback Street and the southerly side of Bison Avenue. 10. The Water Plan shall be approved by the Utilities Director before any building plans are approved, and when the building is ready to be built, that the Utilities Director will take the most current drought situation into consideration. 11. That all developments shall be subject to Water Conservation Laws or regulations, if any exist prior to the issuance of a building permit. D. Amendment No. 701, Traffic Study No. 67 Findings: 1. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and provides for land uses compatible with the surrounding area. u Final Findings and Conditions • Page 4 2. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S4. 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project generated traffic for up to 20,000 square feet of retail development will not be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of a critical intersection, and will not add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any critical intersection which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of.90 of less. 4. That the proposed project will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service on any"major, "primary-modified;' or "primary" street. Conditions: 1. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 2. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, and a watering program designed to nummi e the impacts of haul operations. 3. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit. A copy of the plan shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 4. Grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer incorporating the recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans shall be furnished to the Building Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. If found necessary by the City of Newport Beach, the project applicant will be required to enter into an agreement and post a bond guaranteeing the repair of the public street system, utilities or other public property that might be damaged during excavation and construction of retaining structures and foundations. 6. Construction activities will be conducted in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code,which limits the hours of construction and excavation work to 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, and 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays. Hand excavation activities which involve the use of stone drills, it Final Findings and Cond Pions Page 5 jack hammers, or other similar tools which produce grinding, pounding or other similar loud and pulsating sounds shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 7. A dust control program in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 shall be implemented during excavation and construction. This program shall include such measures as: containing soil on-site until it is hauled away, periodic watering of stockpile soil, and regular vacuum sweeping of streets used for the haul operation to remove accumulated material. 8. The Water Plan shall be approved by the Utilities Director before any building plans are approved, and when the building is ready to be built, that the Utilities Director will take the most current drought situation into consideration. 9. That all developments shall be subject to Water Conservation Laws or regulations, if any exist prior to the issuance of a building permit. r -� CITY OF NRPORT BEARU COUNCIL MEMBERS MINUTES S March 11 1991 ROLL CALL INDEX Council was advised that at the next City GPA 90-1(C Council meeting, an emergency ordinance will be introduced, and if six members of the Council concur, the ordinance will be adopted and take effect immediately. The conditions that are being proposed on this project will be in effect immediately before a building permit is issued. David Neish, Representative of The Irvine Company, addressed the Council, stipulating that they concur with the Findings and Conditions contained in Exhibit A, and would respectfully request that the council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and approve their requests. He added that as far as any future developments in Fashion Island and North Ford, if it is the Council's intent to adopt an emergency ordinance in the next two weeks, they can be assured that The Irvine Company will not be drawing building permits within that two-week time frame. He also stated that The Irvine Company would not have any problem in accepting the conditions that they be subject to water conservation laws and/or regulations, and complying with the condition that there be no construction on Sundays and holidays. Motion x Motion was made to: All Ayes A. Adopt Resolution No. 91-20, Res 91-20 approving GPA 90-1(G) , amending the Land Use Element of the General Plan to provide for Administrative , Professional and Financial Commercial uses as an alternative use on the Pactel site; B. Adopt Resolution No. 91-21, Res 91-21 approving Planning Commission Amendment No. 721, amending the North Ford Planned Community District Regulations to provide for 20,000 square feet of office development on the Pactel site; C. Traffic study No. 70 for proposed office development on the Pacific Telephone site; D. Adopt Resolution No. 91-22, Res 91-22 approving Planning Commission Amendment No. 701, increasing permitted development in the Fashion Island Planned Community by 13,550 square feet; Volume 45 - Page 71 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACO COUNCIL MEMBERS MINUTES � V �f ROLL CRLL March 11, 1991 INDEX E. _ Traffic Study No, 67 for- entitlement transfer and increased square footage at Fashion Island; F. Adopt Resolution No. 91-23, Res 91-23 making a finding of General Plan consistency for a transfer of 13,550 square feet of commercial development from the Pacific Telephone site to Fashion Island; O. Acceptance of an environmental document for the above approvals; H. The Water Plan is to be approved by the Utilities Director before any building plans are approved, and when the building is ready to be built that the Utilities Director will take the most current drought situation into consideration; I. All developments will be subject to Water Conservation Laws gr regulations, if any exist prior to the issuance of a building permit; and J. Condition No. 7, Exhibit A - Delete . . .^and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays." E. PUBLIC COMMENTS: 1. Allan Beek, 2007' Highland, addressed the SJHT Crdr Council regarding the certification of the EIR for the San Joaquin Hills "Feeway," stating that this is the same as a toll road. He advised that the bond underwriters will want collateral to guarantee payment of the construction bonds for this toll road, and presented facts that the toll booths will not be able to pay off the bonds. He added that he is very , much afraid this collateral consists of the property taxes collected from real estate, which includes, many of the homes in Newport Beach, and commented that there is an opinion from Senator Marion Bergeson's ' office which confirms this fear--that the Joint Powers Authority really does have taxing power. He feels that every effort r' Volume 45 - Page 72 CITY OF -NEWPORT BEACPj COUNCIL MEMBERS MINUTES S March 11, 1991 INDEX CALL 3. Mayor Sansone opened the public hearing GPA 90-1( regarding GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90- (45) 1(G) - A request by THE IRVINE COMPANY to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan to provide for Administrative, Professional and Financial Commercial uses as an alternate use on the Pacific Telephone site (Camelback Street and Bison Avenue) ; and the acceptance of an Environmental Document; AND PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENT NO. 721 - A PCA 721 request to amend the North Ford Planned community District Regulations to provide for 20,000 square feet of office development on the Pacific Telephone site; AND TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 70 - For proposed office Traffic development on the Pacific Telephone site. Study 70 Property located at 1177 Camelback Street; AND FINDING OF GENERAL PLAN •CONSISTENCY - A Finding request by The Irvine Company for a finding GP Cnstnc of General Plan consistency for a transfer of 13,550 square feet of commercial development from the Pacific Telephone site to Fashion Island; AND PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENT NO. 701 - A PCA 701 request to amend the Fashion Island Planned Community Development Regulations so as to increase the allowable development allocation by 13,550 square feet; AND -.._TRAF.RLC-STUDY-No.-fs7=�oLJ,xLc_reased square Traffic ...._footage-at-Eashicn.saland... Study 67 Report from the Planning Department. It was noted that the 1988 General Plan permits 33,550 sq. ft. of commercial development in parcel 2(a) adjacent to Bison, midway between MacArthur and Jamboree, which is currently undeveloped and used as a parking lot. The proposal is to reduce the allowed density in parcel 2(a) from 33,550 sq. ft. to 20,000 sq. ft. of office development. The difference of 13,550 sq. ft. would be transferred to Fashion Island within the Loop, and in the Volume 45 - Page 69 W CITY OF NEWPORT BEAN A COUNCIL MEMBERS MINUTES � � 'A ROLL CRLL March 11, 1991 INDEX Loop, The Irvine Company currently has GPA 90-1(G; 5,643 sq. ft. of unused entitlements. The applicant is proposing to combine the 13,550 sq. ft. being transferred from parcel 2(a) to Fashion Island with the 5,643 sq. ft. , resulting in approximately 19,000 sq. ft. of commercial development in Fashion Island. It would not increase the total sq. footage of the General Plan, but decrease parcel 2(a) by 13, 550' aq ft. and increase Fashion Island. The Traffic Phasing Ordinance shows that 'in Fashion Island the proposal meets all the requirements of the TPO, and if parcel 2(a) remains as office development, it meets all criteria of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. If medical offices goes in on Parcel 2(a) , which it could, then the intersection at Bison and MacArthur would be impacted greater than the TPO allows, and it would require the construction of one additional two-lane, which would be accomplished by restriping. The Advance Planning Manager, Patty Temple, advised the Council that mitigation, which was taken out by the City of Irvine, will again be required at this location. The City of Irvine is basically doing all of the planning to add the third northbound through lane in relation to the improvements coming in at Bonita Canyon Road as a result of the connection of Pelican Bill Road. The required mitigation here, will be a widened intersection with the three lanes staying on northbound MacArthur through the Bonita Canyon intersection, and actually become a part of the City of Irvine,s project; therefore, the City of Newport Beach does not anticipate a problem at this time. Discussion ensued, wherein it was suggested that conditions be placed on the subject project that; 1) 'The Water Plan is to be approved by the Utilities Director before , any building plans are approved, and when the building is ready to be built, that the Utilities Director will take the most current drought situation into consideration] 2) All developments will be subject to Water Conservation Laws or requirements, if any exist prior to the issuance of a building permit; and 3) Delete .. ."and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays". . .from Condition No. 7, Exhibit A, regarding construction hours. Volume 45 - Page 70 s • City Councilteting March 11. 1991 . w t Agenda Item No. '3 f CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A. General Plan Amendment 90.1(G)(Public Hearinel Request by the Irvine Company to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan to provide for Administrative Professional -and Financial Commercial uses as an alternate use on the Pacific Telephone site (Camelback Street and Bison Avenue); and the acceptance'of an,environmental document. INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach AND B. Amendment No. 721 (Public Hearine) Request to amend the North Ford Planned Community District Regulations to provide for 20,000 square feet of office development on the Pacific Telephone site. AND C. Traffic Study No. 70 (Public Hearing) Request for a Traffic Study for proposed office development on the Pacific Telephone site. LOCATION: Lot 6, Tract No. 6680, located at 1177 Camelback Street, on the northwesterly corner of Bison Avenue and Camelback Street, in the North Ford Planned Community. ZONE: P-C AND D. Finding of General Plan Consistency (Discussion) Request by the Irvine Company for a finding of General Plan consistency for a transfer of 13,550 square feet of commercial development from the Pacific Telephone site to Fashion Island. 0 TO: City Council - 2. INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach AND E. Amendment No. 701 (Public Hearing) Request to amend the Fashion Island Planned Community Development Regulations so as to increase the allowable development allocation by 13,550 square feet. AND F. Traffic Study No. 67 (Public Hearing) Request for a Traffic Study for increased square footage at Fashion Island. APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant Suggested Action If desired, approve the following: Resolution No. , approving GPA 90-1(G), amending the Land Use Element of the General Plan to provide for Administrative Professional and Financial Commercial uses as an alternate use on the Pactel site. Resolution No. , approving Amendment No. 721, amending the North Ford Planned Community District Regulations to provide for 20,000 square feet of office development on the Pactel site. Traffic Study No. 70. Traffic study for proposed office development on the Pacific Telephone site. Resolution No. approving Amendment No. 701, increasing permitted development in the Fashion Island Planned Community by 13,550 square feet. Traffic Study No. 67. Traffic study for entitlement transfer and increased square footage at Fashion Island. Resolution No. ,making a finding of General Plan consistency for a transfer of 13,550 square feet of commercial development from the Pacific Telephone site to Fashion Island. AND . t • TO: City Council - 3. Acceptance of an environmental document for the above approvals. Applications/Project Objective The above approvals are needed to accomplish the applicant's objective which is to gain entitlements for the construction of approximately 20,000 square feet of office space at the Pacific Telephone (Pactel) site located in the North Ford Planned Community and approximately 20,000 square feet of additional retail space at Fashion Island. Planning Commission Recommendation On February 7, 1991, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend to the City Council that the above applications be approved. Copies of the Planning Commission minutes and staff report are attached. Respectfully submitted, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director SANDRA GENIS Senior Planner Attachments: Exhibit A, Findings and Conditions Resolution No. ,approving General Plan Amendment 90-1(G) Resolution No. , General Plan Consistency Resolution No. , North Ford P-C Amendment Resolution No. , Fashion Island P-C Amendment Excerpt of the February 7, 1991 Planning Commission Minutes. February 7, 1991 Planning Commission staff report with Traffic Study No. 70, Traffic Study No. 67, and'Negative Declaration and Initial Study attached. \env\pacte1\ccst2 0 • ; TO: City Council - 4. a EXHIBIT A FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS A. Environmental Document: Accept the environmental document, making the following,findings: 1. That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and Council Policy K-3. 2. That the contents of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project. 3. That based on the information contained in the initial study, comments received, and all related documents, there is no substantial evidence that the project (as conditioned or as modified by mitigation measures identified in the initial study) could have a significant effect on the environment. B. GPA 90-1 (G) 1. The proposed office use is-compatible with the existing land uses in the North Ford Planned Community. 2. Based on informationcontained in the traffic study which has been performed for development proposed under the proposed amendment, the circulation system will not be adversely affected by the proposed project: C. General Plan Consistency Determination/Density Transfer 1. A traffic analysis was prepared to assess the impact of the proposed transfer of development, and the traffic analysis indicated that the transfer would not adversely, affect the City of Newport Beach traffic system. D. Amendment No. 721, Traffic Study No. 70 Findines: 1. That the proposed amendment is consistent With the General Plan and provides for land uses compatible with the surrounding area. 2. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and'City Policy S4. TO: Ci - 5.ty CouncIl 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project generated traffic for a general office development will not add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any critical intersection which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of .90 or less. 4. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project generated traffic for a medical office development will be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period at the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and Bison Avenue and the intersection of Jamboree Road and Bison Avenue, and could potentially add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and Bison Avenue. 5. That the Traffic Study suggests circulation system improvements which will improve the level of traffic service to an acceptable level at all critical intersections. 6. That the proposed project, including circulation system improvements will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service on any "major;' 'primary-modified," or "primary" street. Conditions: 1. Medical office uses on the Pactel site shall not be certified for occupancy until such time as an additional northbound through lane on MacArthur at Bison is provided. 2. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 3. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, and a watering program designed to minimize the impacts of haul operations. 4. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit. A copy of the plan shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 5. Grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer incorporating the recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the geologic ."Approved as Built" grading plans shall be furnished• to the Building Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. If found necessary by the City of Newport Beach, the project applicant will be required to enter into an agreement and post a bond guaranteeing the repair 0 • r TO: City Council - 6. of the public street system, utilities or other public property that might be damaged during excavation and construction of retaining structures and foundations. 7. Construction activities will be conducted in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code,which limits the hours of construction and excavation work to 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 10:00,a.m to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays. Hand excavation activities which involve the use of stone drills, jack hammers, or other similar tools which produce grinding,pounding or other similar loud and pulsating sounds shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 8. A dust control program in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 shall be implemented during excavation and construction. This program shall include such measures as: containing soil on-site until it is hauled away, periodic watering of stockpile soil, and regular vacuum sweeping of streets used for the haul operation to remove accumulated material. 9. The lighting system for the proposed developments shall be designed in a manner so as to conceal the light source and minimize light and glare to the nearby residential properties on .the northeasterly side of Camelback Street and the southerly side of Bison Avenue. D. Amendment No. 701, Traffic Study No. 67 Findings 1. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and provides for land uses compatible with the surrounding area. 2. That a Traffic Study has been .prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S4. 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project generated traffic for up to 20,000 square feet of retail development will not,be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of a critical intersection, and will not add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any critical intersection which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of.90 of less. 4. That the proposed project will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service on any"major, "primary-modified;' or "primary" street. TO: City f uncil - 7. Conditions: 1. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 2. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, and a watering program designed to minimize the impacts of haul operations. 3. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit. A copy of the plan shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 4. Grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer incorporating the recommendations of a soil engineer and, an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans shall be furnished to the Building Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. If found necessary by the City of Newport Beach, the project applicant will be required to enter into an agreement and post a bond guaranteeing the repair of the public street system, utilities or other public property that might be damaged during excavation and construction of retaining structures and foundations. 6. Construction activities will be conducted in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code,which limits the hours of construction and excavation work to 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays. Hand excavation activities which involve the use of stone drills, jack hammers, or other similar tools which produce grinding,pounding or other similar loud and pulsating sounds shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 7. A dust control program in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 shall be implemented during excavation and construction. This program shall include such measures as: containing soil on-site until it is hauled away, periodic watering of stockpile soil, and regular vacuum sweeping of streets used for the haul operation to remove accumulated material. RESOLUTION NO. _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF'NEWPORT BEACH APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE NEWPORT BEACHGENERALPLANFOR PROPERTY LOCATEDAT 1177 CAMELBACK STREET[GENERAL PLAN AMEND- MENT 90-1 (G)j WHEREAS,the Land Use Element of the General Plan sets forth objectives, supporting policies and limitations for development in,the City of Newport Beach; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Element designates the general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of land and building intensities in a number of ways, including residential,land use categories,and population projections,commercial floor area limitations,the floor area ratio ordinances; and WHEREAS, the Land Use and Circulation Elements are correlated as required by California planning law;,and WHEREAS, the provisions and policies of the Land Use and Circulation Elements are further implemented by the traffic analysis procedures of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance and the implementation programs of that Ordinance and the Fair Share Traffic Contribution Fee Ordinance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 707 of the Charter of the City of Newport Beach,the Planning Commission has held a public hearing to consider a certain amendment to the Land Use Element of the Newport Beach General Plan and has recommended approval of Amendment No. 90.1(G); and WHEREAS,the proposed office use is compatible with the existing land uses in the North Ford Planned Community; and , WHEREAS, the circulation system will not be adversely affected by the proposed project; and WHEREAS,the City of Newport Beach prepared a Negative Declaration with supporting Initial Study for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and,the State CEQA Guidelines; and 1 J WHEREAS,on March 11,1991,the City Council of the City of Newport Beach held a public hearing regarding the amendment; and WHEREAS, the public was duly noticed of the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the environmental document in making its decision on the proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the Newport Beach General Plan; and NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach that an amendment to the General Plan is hereby approved so as to provide for Administrative,Professional,and Financial Commercial uses as an alternate use on the Pactel site located at 1177 Camelback Street. ADOPTED this —day of . 1991. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk sLG\crrv\rncrEL\Ccars GPA 2 p P RESOLUTION NO. _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH APPROVING A TRANSFER OF ALLOWED DEVELOPMENT FROM THE NORTH FORD/SAN DIEGO CREEK PLANNED COMMUNITY TO FASHION ISLAND IN NEWPORT CENTER WITH THE DETERMINATION THAT THE TRANSFER IS CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS,the Land Use Element of the General Plan sets forth objectives, supporting policies and limitations for development in the City of Newport Beach; and WHEREAS,in the adopted Land Use Element,the City established the ability to transfer development allocations; and WHEREAS, transfers may be approved so long as the traffic system is not adversely affected; and WHEREAS, a traffic analysis was prepared to assess the impact of the proposed transfer of development; and WHEREAS,the traffic analysis indicated that the transfer would not adversely affect the City of Newport Beach traffic system; and WHEREAS,the City of Newport Beach prepared a Negative Declaration for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the environmental document in making its decision on the proposed amendment and has recommended the approval of the proposed transfer; and WHEREAS,on March 11,1991,the City Council of the City of Newport Beach held a public hearing regarding the amendment; and WHEREAS, the public was duly noticed of the public hearing; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach that a transfer of 13,550 square feet of retail development from the Nofth Ford/San Diego Creek Planned'Community to the Fashion Island Planned Community in Newport Center is determined to be consistent with the intent of the General Plan and is hereby approved. 1 10 1 ADOPTED this —day of . 1991. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk SLG\SNV\PACIL'L\GPDEr-CCRRS i I 2 RESOLUTION NO._ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE NORTH FORD SAN DIEGO CREEK PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS (PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENT NO.721) WHEREAS,the Newport Beach Municipal Code provides specific procedures for the implementation of Planned Community zoning for properties within the City of Newport Beach; and WHEREAS, an amendment to the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District regulations is necessary in order to provide for it specified square footage of additional office development in Area.2 of the Planned Community consistent with the General Plan and is necessary to maintain consistency between the Newport Beach General Plan and'the Zoning Ordinance;and WHEREAS,the City of Newport Beach prepared a Negative Declaration for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the environmental document in making its decision on the proposed amendment and has recommended approval of Amendment No.721. WHEREAS,on March 11,1991,the City Council of the City of Newport Beach held a public hearing regarding the amendment;and WHEREAS, the public was duly noticed of the public hearing; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Newport Beach does hereby approve an amendment to the Planned Community designated as Planning Commission Amendment No.721 to provide for an additional 20,000 square feet of office development in North Ford Area 2a as shown on Exhibit 1 attached. 1 11- ADOPTED this_day of . 1991. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk sic\ecrv\rncrEL\CC-RM•m Attachment: Exhibit 1 2 13 III Exhibit 1 ,. GQ' .mow 1 C y r K 1 Y � / Nf�♦NwM � ♦ 4 N !I• '1 A O ♦ LIGHT INDUSTRIAL- office + • •' ' ® LIGHT INDUSTRIAL- Office/CommAnd. ® OFFICE ® COMMERCIAL �.� SPECIAL LANDSCAPED •.iyl. ///r ///////// �. • STREETS AND AREAS �• RESIDENTIAL PARK LAND USE FLAN NOT TO SCALE NORTH FORD/SAN DIEGO CREEK wz..+Av1v MPLANNED` COMMUNITYD1STRlCT +..,�TM�;;,;,'"W:ra SECTION I. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS North Ford / San Diego Creek Approx. Additional Additional Gross Allowable Allowable Area Acres S Ft. DU's Light Industry-Office 1 16.7 -0- -0- Light Industry-Office- Commercial/Industrial 2 25.5 20,000 *• . -0- TOTAL 42.2 20,000 -0- [—Approx. I Additional Additional Gross Allowable Allowable Area Acres Sq. Ft. DU's Commercial 3 5.0 50,000 -0- Office 4 22.0 Undetermined -0- Residential 5 79.0 -0- 888 Park 6 12.0 -0- -0- TOTAL 118.0 50,000 888 The above statistics are based on gross acreage and do not account for buildable area. The analysis also indicates additional allowable development in the existing developed areas (Area 1 and 2) and allowable development in the undeveloped areas (square feet or DU's) per GPA 82-1. Existing developed areas are assumed to be built out by Planned Community-Amendment 514. In Areas 1 and 2, new development may replace existing development so long as no square feet are added. (it may be assumed that Areas 1 and 2 will be the subject of future PC District Amendments as reedevelopment occurs.) * additional allowable develo ment.'is allocated to This.20'•000 square feet of additi n I p .Area 2a (See Land Use-Plan Map)'. iL l 1 SECTION V. LIGHT INDUSTRY, BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL, AND COMMERCIAL, AREA 2 A. Intent It is the intent of this district to permit the location of a combination of light industrial uses, business and professional office uses, and Commercial/Industrial uses engaged in the sales of products and services relating,to and supporting the development plan, provided such uses are confined within a building or buildings, and do not contribute excess noise, dust, smoke, or vibration to the surrounding environment nor-contain a high hazard potential due to the nature of the products, material or processes involved. Ancillary activities, i.e., vehicle and bulk storage, associated with the above prmitted uses maybe located outside a structure provided screening requirements as set forth in this document are observed. B. Permitted Uses The following uses and other uses which in the•opinion of the Planning Director are compatible shall be permitted: 1. Commercial/Industrial Uses primarily engaged in commercial activities that involve some degree of on-site production, assembly, repair, maintenance, etc., of the product sold or products related to the service rendered, such as, but not limited to, the following list of examples: a. Appliance sales, rental, repair b. Furniture sales, rental, repair C. Locksmith d. Plumbing shop e. Carpet sales and cleaning f. Drapery sales and cleaning g. Home improvement centers h. Equipment rental centers I. Wholesale-retail food distributors ). Nursery and garden stores 2. Public and Quasi-Public Uses a. Post office b. Public and quasi-public utility business office and related service facilities C. Utility substation d: Service and maintenance facilities '3. Office Area 2a !Permitted office uses.fnclude.business and professional offices, corporate _headquarters facilities, and medical offices. C. Building site area Twenty thousand (20,000) square feet minimum. r 6 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE FASHION ISLAND PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS (PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENT NO. 701) WHEREAS,the Newport Beach Municipal Code provides specific procedures for the implementation of Planned Community zoning for properties within the City of Newport Beach; and WHEREAS,a transfer of General Plan development intensity from the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community to the Fashion Island Planned Community has bee found to be consistent with the intent of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the existing Fashion Island Planned Community Development Plan and District Regulations do not provide for the additional development transferred to Fashion Island;and WHEREAS,the City of Newport Beach prepared a Negative Declaration for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the environmental document in making its decision on the proposed amendment and has recommended the approval of Amendment No.701; and WHEREAS,on March 11,1991,the City Council of the City of Newport Beach held a public hearing regarding the amendment; and P g WHEREAS, the public was duly noticed of the public hearing; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Newport Beach does hereby approve an amendment to the Planned Community designated as Planning Commission Amendment No.701 to provide for an additional 13,550 square feet of retail and restaurant development in Fashion Island as shown on Exhibit 1 attached. 1 1'7 li t ADOPTED this_day of , 1991, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk SLG\WMI'AGrEL\CCRRS.701 Attachment; Exhibit 1 2 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Total Acres 75 Acres Retail/Restaurant ' ,' ,rrrr� Y;� 4, tfti Sq.Ft. Theater 1,700 Seats 2-13-90 4 h . 8. Accessory uses normally incidental to commercial developments, including video game devices in theaters and restaurants, where such uses do not alter the character of the area in respect to their use for purposes permitted in the district. Accessory buildings shall 'be allowed only when constructed concurrent with or subsequent to the buildings housing primary uses. 9. Temporary structures and uses. Regulations are as specified in Section 20.30.015 of General Controls - Commercial Districts of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 10. Office uses, only when such offices are ancillary to and in the same building as a permitted use, .including Fashion Island management and leasing facilities. USES WHICH REQUIRE A USE PERMIT The following uses shall be permitted subject to the securing of a use permit in each case: 1. Gymnasiums, health clubs and other uses which are of a similar nature. 2. Free standing drive-in, outdoor and take-out restaurants located outside the Fashion Island Mall area. 3. Drive-in facilities. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Floor Area and Development Limits. The total gross floor area permitted in all structures, except theaters and enclosed bicycle lockers, shall not exceed 1,310,750 'ULTA2�`'1-T*Q gross square feet; provided, however, that the floor area devoted to parking within a building shall not be considered in determining the total floor area allowed. Of this floor area limitation a maximum of 15% may be for restaurant uses, including drive-in and take-out restaurants, both freestanding restaurants and those within the Fashion Island mall area. Commercial land uses not within a struc- ture, such as balloon vendors, ice cream carts, popcorn carts and similar uses which are "portable" in nature, shall not be a reduction of entitlement -established by this section. Outdoor areas and kiosks which are defined by planters, awnings, shade structures, fences or rails and are for the exclusive and permanent use for display or seating by a retail or restaurant use shall be calculated as floor area. Incidental outdoor seating, covered or uncovered, which is not for the exclusive use of any retail or restaurant establishment shall not be calculated as floor area as entitled by this section. Bicycle storage lockers contained within structures shall not be 2-13-90 it )�o COMMISSIONERS c"'u"'y Al" MINUTES ' CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH INDEX ROLL CALL A 1 General Plan Amendment 90-1(G)(Publi�) lta:. :' 2 GPA 9�. •iG Request by the Irvine Company to amend the Land Use Element (Res. -244) of the General Plan to provide for Administrative Professional and A721 Financial Commercial uses as an alternate use on the Pacific (Res.1246) Telephone site (Camelback Street and Bison Avenue); and the TS No.70 acceptance of an environmental document. GP consist. INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach (Res.1245)A701 (Res. 1247) AND TS67 A 2 Amendment No 721 (Public Hearing) Approved Request to amend the North Ford Planned Community District Regulations to provide for 20,000 square feet of office development on the Pacific Telephone site. AND A 3 Traffic Study No 70 (public Hearing) Request for a Traffic Study for proposed office development on the Pacific Telephone site. LOCATION: Lot 6, Tract No. 6680, located at 1177 Camelback Street, on the northwesterly corner of Bison Avenue and Camelback Street, in the North Ford Planned Community. ZONE: P-C AND -4- COMMISSIONERS February /> 1�y1 MINUTES' ' A A O F� �p`pY•pad CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL jPlan DEX B 1 Finding of General Plan Consistency (Discussion Request by the Irvine Company for a finding of Gconsistency for a transfer of 13,550 square feet of development from the Pacific Telephone site to Fashi INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach AND B 2 Amendment No 701 (rPublic Hearinel Request to amend the Fashion Island Planned Community Development Regulations so as to increase the allowable development allocation by 13,550 square feet. AND B 3 Traffic Study No (Public Hearinel Request for a Traffic Study for increased square footage at Fashion Island. APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant 'The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. David Neish appeared before the Planning Commission on behalf of the applicant, and he concurred with the Findings and Conditions in Exhibit 'W'. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. Motion * Motion was made to recommend and adopt General Plan Amendment No. 90-1 (G) (Resolution No. 1244),Amendment No. 721 (Resolution No. 1246), Traffic Study No. 70, Finding of General Plan Consistency (Resolution No. 1245), Amendment No. -5- yz x " COMMISSIONERS . menu I w 0 �P CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL INDEX 701 (Resolution No. 1247), and Traffic Study No. 67, to the City Council. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Glover, Don Webb, City Engineer, and James Hewicker, Planning Director, explained that Traffic Models are not projected for a specific time frame, and the projections consider the remaining development rights as specified by the General Plan. Ayes * * * * * * The foregoing motion was voted on, MOTION CARRIED. Absent A. Environmental Document: Accept the environmental document, making the following findings: 1. That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and Council Policy K-3. 2. That the contents of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project. 3. That based on the information contained in the initial study, comments received, and all related documents, there is no substantial evidence that the project (as conditioned or as modified by mitigation measures identified in the initial study) could have a significant effect on the environment. B. GPA 90-1 (G) 1. The proposed office use is compatible with the existing land uses in the North Ford Planned Community. 2. Based on information contained in the traffic study which has been performed for development proposed under the proposed amendment, the circulation system will not be adversely affected by the proposed project. -6- 23 February 7, 1991 MINUTES COMMISSIONERS t A 90� •�in F CITY OF NEWORT BEACH ROLL CALL INDEX ._ C. General Plan Consistency Determination/Density TrAnst'er 1. A traffic analysis was prepared to assess the impact of the proposed transfer of development, and the traffic analysis indicated that the transfer would not adversely affect the City of Newport Beach traffic system. D. Amendment No 721 TraMc Study No. 70 Findines: 1. That the proposed amendment is• consistent with the General Plan and provides for land uses compatible with the surrounding area. 2. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15AO of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S4. 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project generated traffic for a general office development will not add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any critical intersection which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of .90 of less. 4. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project generated traffic for a medical office development will be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period at the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and Bison Avenue and the intersection of Jamboree Road and Bison Avenue,and could potentially add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and Bison Avenue. 5. That the Traffic Study suggests circulation system improvements which will improve the level of traffic service to an acceptable level at all critical intersections. -7- Zq • ' COMMISSIONERS " - - MINUTES a �0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH INDEX ROLL CALL 6. NMI t e propose project, inc u ing circu ation system improvements will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service on any "major", "primary-modified" or "primary" street. Conditions: 1. Medical office uses on the Pactel site shall not be certified for occupancy until such time as an additional northbound through lane on MacArthur at Bison is provided. 2. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 3. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, and a watering program designed to minimize the impacts of haul operations. 4. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit. A copy of the plan shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 5. Grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer incorporating the recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the"Approved as Built"grading plans shall be furnished to the Building Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. If found necessary by the City of Newport Beach,the project applicant will be required to enter into an agreement and post a bond guaranteeing the repair of the public street system, utilities or other public property that might be damaged during excavation and construction of retaining structures and foundations. -8- ).5 COMMISSIONERS February7, 1991 MINgTES O ir,� Oyu c�tP CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL I INDEX 7. Construction activities will he conducted in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code, which limits the hours of construction and excavation work to 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on'Saturdays and, 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 ,p.m. on Sundays and holidays. Hand excavation activities which involve the use of stone drills, jack hammers,or other similar tools which produce,grinding, pounding or other similar loud and pulsating sounds shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 8. A dust control program in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 shall be implemented during, excavation and construction. This program shall include such measures as: containing soil on- site until it is hauled away, periodic watering of stockpile soil, and regular vacuum sweeping of streets used for the haul operation to remove accumulated material. 9. The lighting system for the proposed developments shall be designed in a manner so as to conceal the light source and minimize light and glare to the nearby residential properties on the northeasterly side of Camelback Street and the southerly side of Bison Avenue. E. Amendment No 701 Trafl"ic Study No. 67 Findings: 1. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and provides for land uses compatible with the surrounding area. 2. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport 'Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1. -9- 3 �6 • reoruaiy i, 17y+ MINUTES COMMISSIONERS �0� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH INDEX ROLL CALL 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project generated traffic for up to 20,000 square feet of retail development will not be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of a critical intersection, and will not add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any critical intersection which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of .90 of less. 4. That the proposed project will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service on any "major", "primary-modified" or "primary" street. Conditions: 1. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 2. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, and a watering program designed to minimize the impacts of haul operations. 3. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit. A copy of the plan shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board,'Santa Ana Region. 4. Grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer incorporating the recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the"Approved as Built"grading plans shall be furnished to the Building Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. If found necessary by the City of Newport Beach,the project applicant will be required to enter into an agreement and post a bond guaranteeing the repair of the public street system, utilities or other public •property that might be -10- l� ! 0 �. COMMISSIONERS February 7, 1991 MIN,.UTES '� A t9 O,O Fo'P �O£q-� �Oq,�- N CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL INDEX damaged during excavation and construction of retaining structures and foundations. , , 6. Construction activities will be conducted in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code,which limits the hours of construction and excavation work to 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. on Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays. Hand excavation activities which involve the use of stone drills, jackhammers,or other similar tools which produce grinding, pounding or other similar loud and pulsating sounds shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 7. A dust control program in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 shall be implemented during excavation and construction. This program shall include su&measures as: containing soil on- site until it is hauled away, periodic watering of stockpile soil, and regular vacuum sweeping of streets used for the haul operation to remove accumulated material. rRequest e Plan Amendment N 1(A Public Hearin Item No.3 to consider endment to the Land Use Element of GPA 90-1A eneral Plan to establish lling unit limit consistent with �(723.1248) ng development for the residenu as on Domingo DriveApproved Amigos Way in the Eastbluff area of New Beach. INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach AND -11- ' Planning Commission Meeting February 7. 1991 Agenda Item No. 2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A. General Plan Amendment 90-1(G)(Public Hearing) Request by the Irvine Company to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan to provide for Administrative Professional and Financial Commercial uses as an alternate use on the Pacific Telephone site (Camelback Street and Bison Avenue); and the acceptance of an environmental document. INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach AND B. Amendment No. 721 (Public Hearing) Request to amend the North Ford Planned Community District Regulations to provide for 20,000 square feet of office development on the Pacific Telephone site. AND C. Traffic Study No. 70 (Public Hearing) Request for a Traffic Study for proposed office development on the Pacific Telephone site. LOCATION: Lot 6, Tract No. 6680, located at 1177 Camelback Street, on the northwesterly corner of Bison Avenue and Camelback Street, in the North Ford Planned Community. ZONE: P-C AND D. Finding of General Plan Consistency (Discussion) Request by the Irvine Company for a finding of General Plan consistency for a transfer of 13,550 square feet of commercial development from the Pacific Telephone site to Fashion Island. INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach y f TO: Planning Commission - 2. AND E. Amendment No. 701 (Public Hearing) Request to amend the Fashion Island Planned Community Development Regulations so as to increase the allowable development allocation by 13,550 square feet. AND b'. Traffic Study No. 67 (Public Hearing)• Request for a Traffic Study for increased square footage at Fashion Island. APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant Applications/Prpiect Objective It is the applicant's objective, to gain entitlements for the construction of approximately, 20,000 square feet of office space at the Pacific Telephone (Pactel) site located in the North Ford Planned Community and approximately 20,000,square feet of additional retail space at Fashion Island. In order to accomplish this, the following approvals are needed: GPA 90-1(G). To amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan to provide for Administrative Professional and Financial Commercial uses as an alternate use on the Pactel site. General Plan Amendment procedures are contained in City Council Policy Q-1. Amendment No. 721. To amend the North Ford Planned Community District Regulations to provide for 20,000 square feet of office development on the Pactel site. Amendment procedures are contained in Chapter 20:84 of the Municipal,Code, and Planned Community procedures are contained in Chapter 20.51. Traffic Study No. 70. Traffic study for proposed office development on the Pacific Telephone site. Traffic Study requirements are contained in Chapter 15.40 of the Municipal Code. Amendment No. 701. To increase permitted development in the Fashion Island Planned Community by 13,550 square feet. Traffic Study No. 67. Traffic study for entitlement transfer and increased square footage at Fashion Island. 30 TO: Planning Commission - 3. Finding of General Plan Consistency. Finding of General Plan consistency for a transfer of 13,550 square feet of commercial development from the Pacific Telephone site to Fashion Island. Acceptance of an environmental document for the above approvals. The individual applications are discussed in more detail below. Subject Properties and Surrounding Land Uses The Pacific Telephone (Pastel) site is located at the northeasterly comer of Bison Road and Camelback Street at 1177 Camelback Street. The site is vacant and largely paved. To the north is the United States Post Office, to the east, across Camelback Street, is retail commercial development with multi-family residential development to the northeast; to the south, across Bison Avenue, are attached homes, and to the west are a church and an office/research and development facility. Fashion Island is a regional shopping center located in the central portion of Newport Center,a major commercial center. Land uses within Newport Center are office,restaurant, hotel, residential and recreational uses. North, east, and south of Newport Center are residential uses; to the west are recreational and hotel uses and vacant land. Environmental Documentation In accordance with the California Environmental Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and City Council Policy K-3, an Initial Study has been prepared for the proposed project. Based on the information contained in the initial study, it has been determined that the project, as conditioned, will not have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project and is attached for the Planning Commission's review. Project Approvals The specific approvals necessary for the proposed project are discussed in the following sections: General Plan Amendment No. 90-1 (G). The Pactel site is currently designated for Retail and Service Commercial uses with a maximum gross floor area of 33,550 square feet under the Land Use Element of the General Plan. This designation permits retail sales, offices which offer goods or services directly to the public, hotels, motels, restaurants, commercial recreation, and senior citizen housing facilities. Separate corporate type offices are not permitted. The applicant proposes to develop 20,000 square feet of office space on the site, potentially as medical offices, but possibly as separate corporate offices which do not offer goods or services directly to the public. The latter use could be provided only under the Administrative, Professional, and Financial Commercial designation of the General Plan � l • r r r. t + TO: Planning Commission - 4. which is applied to areas predominantly used for office, but which also accommodate support retail and service commercial uses. Inasmuch as medical offices provide services to the public and would be permitted under the Retail and Service Commercial designation, the only new use contemplated would be separate corporate offices. The office use would be compatible with the surrounding institutional, commercial, and office/research and development uses, and is expected to be as compatible with nearby residential uses as the currently permitted retail uses. Further, as discussed in more detail below, an office use on the site would generate less traffic than a retail use. Staff therefore has no objection to this request. Finding of General Plan Consistency for Density Transfer. The Land Use Element of the General Plan provides for transfers of development rights in Newport Center subject to City approval with the finding that the transfer is consistent with the intent of the General Plan and that the transfer will not result in any adverse traffic impacts. The floor area limits established by the General Plan are designed to coordinate land-use intensity with the City's circulation stem and insure that traffic does not exceed the level of service desired b the �' Y City. Thus development allocations m tY p may be considered consistent with the intent of the General Plan onlyif the associated traffic will not cause the desired level of service t s o be exceeded. As discussed below and in the attached traffic studies, an increase in permitted retail and service commercial development at Fashion Island and associated decrease at the Pactel site will have no adverse impact on traffic, and would, thus be consistent with the intent of the General Plan. Amendment No. 721. The Pactel site is located in Area 2 of the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community. The PC District Regulations specify that Area 2 is to be used for light industrial uses, business and professional offices, and support sales and services. The PC Statistical Analysis provides for various uses by acre, but does not specify any additional allowable square footage for Area 2. However, the Land Use Element of the General Plan would permit up to 33,550 square feet of commercial development on the currently vacant Pactel site. It is proposed that 20,000 square feet of development be provided for the site under the PC, with the remaining 13,550 square feet provided under the General Plan to be transferred to Fashion Island. TPO No., 70: In accordance with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance and City Council Policy S-1, a traffic study was performed for a 20,000 square foot office development on the Pactel site (attached). The first step in evaluating intersections is to conduct a 196 Traffic Volume Analysis, taking into consideration existing traffic, regional growth and the traffic of previously committed projects. For any intersection where, on any approach leg, the project traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of the projected morning or afternoon peak two and one-half hour volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) is required. Results of the one percent test indicate that the project traffic exceeded 1% of projected traffic on an approach leg of the following intersections: • MacArthur Boulevard and Bison Avenue • Jamboree Road and Bison Avenue 3� • ' TO: Planning Commission - 5. An ICU Analysis was conducted for these two intersections. It was found that with a general office use on the Pactel site, the ICU values for the two intersections would be less than .90 or remain unchanged as a result of the proposed project. Thus, no mitigation would be required for the development of general office uses, and the development would meet the requirements of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. With medical office use, the PM peak ICU value for the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and Bison Avenue would increase from .90 to .91, and mitigation would be required. If medical office use is developed on the site, an additional northbound through lane on MacArthur Boulevard at 'Bison Avenue would be necessary to mitigate project traffic. It is anticipated that this could be accomplished by restriping to provide an additional lane within the existing paved right of way. Implementation of this improvement in association with a medical office development will meet the requirements of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. Amendment No. 701. The applicant proposes to amend the Fashion Island Planned Community Development Plan and District Regulation to increase permitted development in Fashion Island by 13,550 square feet resulting in a total allowable development of 1,324,300 gross square feet. Remaining allowable development at Fashion Island is currently 5,643 gross square feet. The increase would bring remaining allowable development to 19,193 gross square feet. The 13,550 square feet would exceed that currently designated for Fashion Island under the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is proposed to be permitted as a transfer of General Plan entitlement from the Pactel site. TPO No. 67. A traffic study was performed for development of up to 20,000 square feet of additional retail development at Fashion Island (attached). A one percent Traffic Volume Analysis of twenty four intersections was performed. Results of the one percent test indicate that the project traffic would not exceed 1% of projected traffic of an approach leg at any intersection during the morning or afternoon.peak two and one-half hour period. Therefore, no additional study was required, and the proposal meets the criteria of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. Conclusions and Recommendations The proposed applications which will ultimately permit the development of 20,000 square feet of freestanding offices on the Pactel site and transfer 13,550 square feet of entitlement to Fashion Island are compatible with the established land uses. As mitigated, the proposed development will not adversely affect the environment nor anticipated levels of traffic service in the community. Staff recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 90-1 (G), Amendment No. 721, and Traffic Study No. 70, Amendmenf No. 701, Traffic Study No. 67, and the related General Plan Consistency Determination. Should the Commission concur, the attached Resolutions and Findings should be adopted. . �3 � f TO: Planning Commissioni - 6. PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director Sandra L. Genis Principal Planner Attachments: Exhibit A, Findings and Conditions Resolution recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 90-1(G) Resolution, General Plan Consistency Resolution, North Ford P-C Amendment Resolution, Fashion Island P-C Amendment Traffic Study No. 70 Traffic Study No. 67 Negative Declaration and Initial' Study \cnv\pac1c1\pc2-7 34 • TO: Planning Commission - 7. EXHIBIT A FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS A. Environmental Document: Accept the environmental document, making the following findings: 1. That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and Council Policy K-3. 2. That the contents of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project. 3. That based on the information contained in the initial study, comments received, and all related documents, there is no substantial evidence that the project (as conditioned or as modified by mitigation measures identified in the initial study) could have a significant effect on the environment. B. GPA 90-1 (GI 1. The proposed office use is compatible with the existing land uses in the North Ford Planned Community. 2. Based on information contained in the traffic study which has been performed for development proposed under the proposed amendment, the.circulation system will not be adversely affected by the proposed project. C. General Plan Consistency Determination/Density Transfer 1.' A traffic analysis was prepared to assess the impact of the proposed transfer of development, and the traffic analysis indicated that the transfer would not adversely affect the City of'Newport Beach traffic system. D. Amendment No 721 Traffic Study No. 70 Findihas 1. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and provides for land uses compatible with the surrounding area. 2. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15AO of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S4. 35 .• � w . r. TO: Planning Commission - 8. 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project generated traffic for a general office development will not add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any critical intersection which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of .90 of less. 4. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project generated traffic for a medical,office development will be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period at the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and Bison Avenue and the intersection of Jamboree Road and Bison Avenue, and could potentially add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and Bison Avenue. 5. That the Traffic Study suggests circulation system improvements which will improve the level of traffic service to an,acceptable level at all critical intersections. 6. That the proposed project, including circulation system improvements will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service on any „ "major", "primary-modified" or "primary" street. Conditions: 1. Medical office uses on the Pactel site shall not be certified for occupancy until such time as an additional northbound through lane on MacArthur at Bison is provided. 2. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 3. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes,.access points to the site, and a watering program designed to minimize the impacts of haul operations. 4. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building.Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit. A copy of the plan shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 5. Grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer incorporating the recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of.the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans shall be furnished to the Building Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. If found necessary by the City of Newport Beach, the project applicant will be required to enter into an agreement and post a bond guaranteeing the repair 36 TO: Planning Commission - 9. of the public street system, utilities or other public property that might be damaged during excavation and construction of retaining structures and foundations. 7. Construction activities will be conducted in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code,which limits the hours of construction and excavation work to 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays. Hand excavation activities which involve the use of stone drills, jack hammers, or other similar tools which produce grinding,pounding or other similar loud and pulsating sounds shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 8. A dust control program in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 shall be implemented during excavation and construction. This program shall include such measures as: containing soil on-site until it is hauled away, periodic watering of stockpile soil, and regular vacuum sweeping of streets used for the haul operation to remove accumulated material. 9. The lighting system for the proposed developments shall be designed in a manner so as to conceal the light source and minimize light and glare to the nearby residential properties on the northeasterly side of Camelback Street and the southerly side of Bison Avenue. D. Amendment No 701 Traffic Study No. 67 Fin in 1. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and provides for land uses compatible with the surrounding area. 2. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S4. 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project generated traffic for up to 20,000 square feet of retail development will not be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of a critical intersection, and will not add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any critical intersection which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of.90 of less. 4. That the proposed project will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service on any "major", "primary-modified" or "primary' street. , K TO: Planning Commission - 10. Conditions: 1. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 2. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, and a watering program designed to minimize the impacts of haul operations. 3. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be'submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit. A copy of the plan shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 4, Grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer incorporating the recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans shall be furnished to the Building Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. If found necessary by the City of Newport Beach, the project applicant will be required to enter into an agreement and post a bond guaranteeing the repair of the public street system, utilities or other public property that might be damaged during excavation and construction of retaining structures and foundations. 6. Construction activities will be conducted in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code,which limits the hours of construction and excavation work to 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 10:00 a.m, to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays. Hand excavation activities which involve the use of stone drills, jack hammers, or other similar tools which produce grinding,pounding or other similar loud and pulsating sounds shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 7. A dust control program in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 shall be implemented during excavation and construction. This program shall include such measures as: containing soil on-site until it is hauled away,periodic watering of stockpile soil, and-regular vacuum sweeping of streets used for the haul operation to remove accumulated material. r Att*nt P RESOLUTION NO._ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1177 CAMELBACK STREET [GENERAL PLAN AMEND- MENT 90-1 (G)l WHEREAS,the Land Use Element of the General Plan sets forth objectives, supporting policies and limitations for development in the City of Newport Beach; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Element designates the general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of land and building intensities in a number of ways, including residential land use categories and population projections,commercial floor area limitations, the floor area ratio ordinances; and WHEREAS, the Land Use and Circulation Elements are correlated as required by California planning law; and WHEREAS, the provisions and policies of the Land Use and Circulation Elements are further implemented by the traffic analysis procedures of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance and the implementation programs of that Ordinance and the Fair Share Traffic Contribution Fee Ordinance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 707 of the Charter of the City of Newport Beach,the Planning Commission has held a public hearing to consider a certain amendment to the Land Use Element of the Newport Beach General Plan; and WHEREAS,the proposed office use is compatible with the existing land uses in the North Ford Planned Community; and WHEREAS, the circulation system will not be adversely affected by the proposed project; and WHEREAS,the City of Newport Beach prepared a Negative Declaration with supporting Initial Study for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines;and 1 ;� 3y mod + r BY Thomas.Edwards Secretary SLG\ecMPACrM\ecaeaes 2 40 RESOLUTION NO._ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A EVELOPMENTFROMTHBNORTHFORD%ANDISFER OF EGO CREEK PLANNED COMMUNITY TO FASHION ISLAND IN NEWPORT CENTER WITH THE DETERMINATION THAT THE TRANSFER IS CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS,the Land Use Element of the General Plan sets forth objectives, supporting policies and limitations for development in the.City of Newport Beach; and WHEREAS,in the adopted Land Use Element,the City established the ability to transfer development allocations; and WHEREAS, transfers may be approved so long as the traffic system is not adversely affected;and WHEREAS, a traffic analysis was prepared to assess the impact of the proposed transfdr of development; and WHEREAS,the traffic analysis indicated that the transfer would not adversely affect the City of Newport Beach traffic system;and WHEREAS,the City of Newport Beach prepared a Negative Declaration for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines;and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the environmental document in making its decision on the proposed amendment. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach that a transfer of 13,550 square feet of retail development from the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community to the Fashion Island Planned Community in Newport Center is determined to be consistent with the intent of the General Plan and is recommended for approval to the City Council. 1 • � Y , Iy 9 f ADoiyrED this day of , 1991, by the following vote, to wit: AYES NOES ABSENT BY Jan Debay Chairman BY Thomas Edwards Secretary SLO\LNV\PACTCL\OPDLT 2 RESOLUTION NO._ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF AN AMEND- MENT TO THE NORTH FORD SAN DIEGO CREEK PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS (PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENT NO.721) WHEREAS,the Newport Beach Municipal Code provides specific,procedures for the implementation of Planned Community zoning for properties within the City of Newport Beach; and WHEREAS, an amendment to the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District regulations is necessary in order to provide for a specified square footage of additional office development in Area 2 of the Planned Community consistent with the General Plan and is necessary to maintain consistency between the Newport Beach General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,the City of Newport Beach prepared a Negative Declaration for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the State CEQA Guidelines;and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the environmental document in making its decision on the proposed amendment. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach does hereby recommend to the City Council an amendment to the Planned Community designated,as Planning Commission Amendment No. 721 to provide for an additional 20,000 square feet of office development in North Ford Area 2a as shown on Exhibit 1 attached. ADOPTED this day of 1991, by the following vote, to wit: 1 2 y • ,y 1 � AYES NOES ABSENT BY Jan Debay Chairman BY Thomas Edwards Secretary Attachment: Exhibit 1 dg\rnv%pauc�A721= 2 Nq L Exhibit 1 �G a '.xiµ l•..•�... YWJ�.w.Ix ♦r• •• ,••,r• .r. •'' .•• .•• .•. U. o .':CAM j,�q. :•:•:::.:: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL- Office ® LIGHT-INDUSTRIAL- Office/CommAnd. ® OFFICE ® COMMERCIAL SPECIAL LANDSCAPED STREETS AND AREAS RESIDENTIAL 0�g "MV• r` PARK r• LAND USE PLAN NOT TO SCALE NORTH FORD/SAN DIEGO CREEK p� PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT SECTION I. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS North Ford / San Diego Creek Approx. Additional Additional Gross I Allowable Allowable AreaI Acres Sq. Ft. D'U's Light Industry-Office 1 16.7 -0- -0- Light Industry-Office- Commercial/Industrial 2 25.5 20,000 * -0- TOTAL 42.2 20,000 -0- aApprox. Additional Additional Gross I Allowable Allowable Area Acres S . Ft. DU s Commercial 3 5.0 50,000 -0- Office 4 22.0 Undetermined -0= Res idential 5 79.0 -0- 888 Park 6 12.0 -0- -0- TOTAL 118.0 50,000 888 The above statistics are based on gross acreage and do not account for buildable area, The analysis also indicates additional allowable development in the existing to ed areas Area 1 and 2 and allowable development in the undeveloped areas developed ) p ( (square feet or DU's) per'GPA 82-1. Existing developed,areas are assumed to be built out by Planned Community Amendment 514. In Areas 1 and 2, new development may replace existing development so long as no square feet are added. (It may be assumed that Areas 1 and 2 will be the subject of future PC District Amendments as reedevelopment occurs.) * This 20,000 square feet of additional allowable d evelopment is allocated to Area 2a (See Land,Use Plan Map) SECTION V. LIGHT INDUSTRY, BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL, AND COMMERCIAL, AREA 2 A. Intent It is the intent of this district to permit the location of a combination of light industrial uses, business and professional office uses, and Commercial/Industrial uses engaged in the sales of products and services relating to and supporting the development plan, provided such uses are confined within a building or buildings, and do not contribute excess noise, dust, smoke, or vibration to the surrounding environment nor contain a high hazard potential due to the nature of the products, material or processes involved. Ancillary activities, i.e., vehicle and bulk storage, associated'with the above prmitted uses may be located outside a structure provided screening requirements as set forth in this document are observed. B. Permitted Uses The following uses and other uses which in the opinion of the Planning Director are compatible shall be permitted: 1. Commercial/Industrial I Uses primarily engaged in commercial activities that involve some degree of on-site production, assembly, repair, maintenance, etc., of the product sold i or products related to the service rendered, such as, but not limited to, the following list of examples: a. Appliance sales, rental, repair b. Furniture sales, rental, repair C. Locksmith d. Plumbing shop e. Carpet sales and cleaning f. Drapery sales and cleaning g. Home improvement centers h. Equipment rental centers I. Wholesale-retail food distributors J. Nursery and garden stores 2. Public and Quasi-Public Uses a. Post office b. Public and quasi-public utility business office and related service facilities C. Utility substation d. Service and maintenance facilities 3� O ce Ar a 2a ermined office uses lnclude business and professional offices, corporate head uartets facilities and medical offices. C. By site area Twenty thousand (20,000) square feet minimum: Y ♦ p I I1LL.�OL � 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF AN AMEND. MENTTOTHEFASHIONISLANDPLANNED COMMUNI TY DISTRICTREGULATIONS(PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENT NO.701) WHEREAS,the Newport Beach Municipal Code provides specific procedures for the implementation of Planned Community zoning for properties within the City of Newport Beach; and WHEREAS,a transfer of General Plan development intensity from the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community to the Fashion Island Planned Community has bee found to be consistent with the intent of the General Plan;and WHEREAS, the existing Fashion Island Planned Community Development Plan and District Regulations do not provide for the additional development transferred to Fashion Island;and WHEREAS,the City of Newport Beach prepared a Negative Declaration for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in, the environmental document in making its decision on the proposed amendment. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach does hereby recommend to the City Council an amendment to the Planned Community designated as Planning Commission Amendment No. 701 to provide for an additional 13,550 square feet of retail and,restaurant development in Fashion Island as.shown on Exhibit 1 attached. ADOPTED this day of 1091,'by the following vote,to wit: i J • AYES NOES ABSENT BY Jan Debay Chairman BY Thomas Edwards Secretary Attachment: Exhibit 1 SI.G\ENV\VACLEL\A701 2 11 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 75 Acres Total Acres .� y.... 4 ()( sq.Ft. Retail/Restaurant m f..•m..' 1,700 Seats Theater 2-13-90 4 8. Accessory uses normally incidental to commercial developments, including video game devices in theaters and restaurants, where such uses do not alter the character of the area in respect to their use for purposes permitted in the district. Accessory buildings shall be allowed only when constructed concurrent with or subsequent to the buildings housing primary uses. 9. Temporary structures and uses. Regulations are as specified in Section 20. 30.015 of General Controls - Commercial Districts of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 10. Office uses, only when such offices are ancillary to and in the same building as a permitted use, including Fashion Island management and leasing facilities. USES WHICH REQUIRE A USE PERMIT The following uses shall be permitted subject to the securing of a use permit in each case: 1. Gymnasiums, -health clubs and other uses which are of a similar nature. 2 . Free standing drive-in, outdoor and take-out restaurants located outside the Fashion Island Mall area. 3 . Drive-in facilities. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Floor Area and Development Limits._ The total gross floor area permitted in all structures, except theaters and enclosed bicycle lockers, shall not exceed 'n14—, i4O r 64 gross square feet; provided, however, that the floor area devoted to parking within a building shall not be considered in determining the total floor area allowed. Of this floor area limitation a maximum of 15% may be for restaurant uses, including drive-in and take-out restaurants, both freestanding restaurants and those within the Fashion Island mall area. Commercial land uses not within a struc- ture, such as balloon vendors, ice cream carts, popcorn carts and similar uses which are "portable" in nature, shall not be a reduction of entitlement established by this section. Outdoor areas and kiosks which are defined by planters, awnings, shade structures, fences or rails and are for the exclusive and permanent use for display or seating by a retail or restaurant use shall be calculated as floor area. Incidental outdoor seating, covered or uncovered, which is not for the exclusive use of any retail or restaurant establishment shall not be calculated as floor area as entitled by this section. Bicycle storage lockers contained within structures shall not be 2-13-90 11 ti� . . ,. 1WestP c � A on Pringle & Associates TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING November 27, 1990 itECEIVED BY Ms. Patricia Temple Mt4NINa DEPARTMENT Principal Planner elyy of NEWpoftT BEACH City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 ���+ ps Newport Beach, CA 92659-1768 AIABt9t�ptut�t1tfttgt4tg g Dear Ms. Temple: This letter summarizes our analysis of traffic factors related to the proposed Office Building on the Pac-Tel site on Camelback Street in the City of Newport Beach. The study has been conducted to satisfy the requirements of the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance. This study is based upon information provided by you, City Staff and previous studies. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is located at the comer of Bison Avenue and Camelback Street. A total of 20,000 square feet (SF) of office use is proposed for the site. Access to the site is proposed at the northeast comer of the site on Camelback Street. Figure 1 illustrates the project location. An alternative use as a medical office building has also been considered. No specific site -development plan was provided. EXISTING CONDITIONS The streets in the area of the project are fully developed. Camelback Street is a two lane street which is the only vehicular access to the site. The site access is not signalized. Camelback Street connects with Bison Avenue to the south and Jamboree Road to the north which provides regional access. _680 Langsdorf Drive_•_Suite 222 • Fullerton. CA__92631 0 (714) 871-2931 • FAX:(714) 871-0389 DR. j ao eR,iSrOL sT fts OL S-C NORTH �20 O LEGE y o v 20 W. 10=DIRECTIONAL O 4p 25 DISTRIBUTON PERC. W 201 a 5�N JQAQu�N ?o� h 3 o 115 ui COASt H, y 10 IT M U w PACIFIC p'J Ax u% 1 PROJECT 'DISTRIBUTION WWON MINGLE & ASSOCIAUS F.�Q RE 1 53 -2- Existing daily traffic volumes and 1990 ICU values at major intersections are illustrated on Figure 2. These data were provided by the City of Newport Beach. TRIP,GENERATION In order to evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the project, it is necessary to estimate the number of trips that would be generated. Trip generation rates for various land uses have been established by the City Traffic Engineer. These rates are summarized in Table 1. By applying these ,rates to the land use data, estimates of trip generation were obtained and are listed in Table 2. As indicated in Table 2, the project with general office use would generate 50 AM peak hour trip ends and 45 PM peak hour trip ends. The AM 2.5 hour period would be 95 trip ends and the PM 2.5 hour period, 95 trip ends. If a medical office is assumed, the AM peak hour generation would be 15 trip ends and the PM peak hour 90. The AM 2.5 hour period would be 30 and the PM 2.5 hour period would be 180. TRIP ASSIGNMENT In order to assign project traffic to the street.system, it is necessary to develop a trip distribution pattern. A pattern for this site was developed based upon previous studies and area development data. That distribution pattern has been utilized to assign project traffic to the road system and is illustrated on Figure 1. The estimated trips from Table 2 were then assigned to the street system in conformance with these distribution patterns. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS The traffic analysis has been completed to conform to the criteria of the City of Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance. A total of 14 intersections were identified by the City Traffic Engineer for inclusion in the analysis. The first required analysis is the "One Percent" test. An intersection is defined as critical by the Ordinance when the project traffic exceeds one percent of existing plus committed project plus regional growth traffic on any approach to an intersection during the AM or PM 2.5 hour period. A list of committed projects was provided by the City for inclusion in this study and these projects are listed in Table 3. 0.61/0.65 37 36 0.46/0.54 DR. 14 0.74/0.60 0.66/Q84aj 0.80/I. 2 \Q v Z, v $ -j 0.47/0.59 • BRISTOL S NORTH Q65/0'N`J�Q�� BRISTOL ST. 29 4 LEGEND 0.83/0.92 SITE 56=DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1.15/0.65 IN THOUSANDS 0.78/0.76 561 54 0.77/0.66= AM/PM ICU y Q68/0.66 4L a 50 10 97/0.74 m � Z 9 a 39 61 GIRD. �� u+ 056/0.4 fORO e0,78/0.74 0.62/0.61 <�O C 50 ti 0.56/0).44 221p 51 Q to co FN' A a��N q 0 d %�32 17 0.89/0.79 $ a h 0.45/0.56 ' h�<<S 12`Q Z 47 co h 3 � a� 0.56/0.86'S a W �+ m Q a 54 29 ~ . T4 37� 43 28 .0 a 60 p0A5T HWY to O� C ib C •�`1 & VIA a PACIFIC a w n ¢ vQD43 ti `� c d d o O 0 M �OF N 0.51/0.51 30 o 0 9P ro po ocr c 0.46/0.59 EXISTING DAILY VOLUMES AND ICU VALUES MMON MMGU a ASSOCIAiF.S FIGURE 2 �5 =3— ' TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION RATES Pac-Tel Site TRIP ENDS PER DZXRU= LAND USE DESCRIPTOR A" AM o Office 1,000 SF 2.0 0.4 0.6 1.7 Medical Office 1,000 SF 0.6 0.2 1.9 2.4 i . • -4- TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION Pac-Tel Site 'TRIP ENDS PERIOD GENERAL OFFICEntc�►L OFFICE Daily 400 550 AM Peak Hour In 40 10 Out 10 5 PM Peak Hour In 10 40 Out 35 50 AM 2.5 Hour In 80 20 Out 15 10 PM 2.5 Hour In 25 80 Out 70 100 6 TABLE 3 COMMITTED PROJECTS Hoag Cancer Center Mariners Church Expansion Civic Plaza Big Canyon Villa Apts. Corporate Plaza 1400 Dove Street Newport Place 1100 Quail Street Valdez McLachlan-Newport Place Koll Center NPT No. 1 Koll Center TPP Amend. 4A 1501 Superior Medical Villa Point Newporter Resort Expansion Rosan's Development Amendment No. 1 North Ford Fashion Island #2 Newport Dunes Newport Aquatics Center Bayview Taco Bell. City of Irvine Development Newport Retirement Inn Shokrian Newport Classic Inn Edwards Newport Center Newport Lido Medical Center Villa Point II Big Canyon 10 Zonta Club Residential YMCA Calty/Toyota Expansion Amendment No. 1 Ford Aero Ambrosia Restaurant Amendment No. 1 MacArthur 28th St. Marina Restaurant 3800 Campus Dr. 15th Street Apartments 3760 Campus Dr. Rockwell Expansion Andrew Restaurant Balboa/Washington Newport Imports Restaurant 5� • • —6— PP A endix A contains the"One Percent" analysis sheets for the 14 intersections analyzed and the results are summarized in Table 4. Review of Table 4 indicates that all intersections passed the "One Percent"test except MacArthur Boulevard and Bison Avenue, and Jamboree Road and Bison Avenue. In conformance with the Traffic Phasing Ordinance, ICU analyses were completed for the two intersections for those periods that were found to be critical. These analyses are contained in Appendix B and included existing, existing plus regional growth plus committed project and existing plus regional growth plus committed project plus project traffic conditions. The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 5. Review of Table 5 indicates that all intersections are projected to have ICU values of less than 0.90 or are not made worse for the critical periods with the project and committed project traffic. The "One Percent" and ICU analysis procedures were redone with trip generation estimates for a medical office use. These analyses are contained in Appendices C and D and summarized in Tables 6 and 7. Review of Table 2 indicates that trip ends decrease during the AM peak hour and AM 2.5 hour period when comparing general office use with medical office use. The trip generation increase during the PM peak periods, therefore only the PM peak periods were reanalyzed. In other words, the medical office use would have reduced impacts during the AM periods and possible increased impacts during the PM periods as compared to general office uses. Review of Table 6 indicates that both the MacArthur/Bison and Jamboree/Bison intersections fail the"One Percent" test for medical office use. The ICU values are summarized in Table 7 for the medical office use and an increase from an ICU value of 0.90 to 0.91 is indicated at the MacArthur/Bison intersection. Discussion with the City Traffic Engineer revealed a plan to add a northbound through lane to MacArthur being prepared by CalTrans. With this improvement the ICU value would be 0.80 which is an acceptable condition. • S • � Y • t. _7_ TABLE 4 ' CRITICAL INTERSECTION IDENTIFICATION Pac-Tel Site - General Office 2.5 HOUR }'ERCENTAGES Ste. EB WB LOCATI AM pM AM PM Am P' AM RM Bristol St. & Campus Dr. - Irvine Ave. - - - - Bristol St. & Birch St. - - - - - - " Bristol St. & Jamboree Rd. 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 - - Bristol St. N. & Campus Dr. - - - - - - - Bristol St. N. & Birch St. - - - - - - Bristol St. N. & Jamboree Rd. 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 - - - - MacArthur Blvd. & Ford Rd. 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 - - 0.2 0.2 MacArthur Blvd. & Bison Ave. 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 1.3 3.0 - - Jamboree Rd. & MacArthur Blvd. - - - - 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 MacArthur Blvd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 - - 0.2 0.1 MacArthur Blvd'. & San Miguel Dr. 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 - - - Jamboree Rd. & Bison Ave. OA 0.1 0.3 0.1 - - 0.7 3.0 Jamboree Rd. & East Bluff Dr. - Ford Rd. 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 - - Jamboree Rd. & East Bluff N. - University 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 - - - 60 A • � —8— TABLE 5 ICU SUMMARY Pac-Tel Site - General Office ICU VALUES EXISTING EXISTING +REGIONAL EXISTING +REGIONAL +COMMITTED EXISTING +REGIONAL +COMMITTED +PROJECT INTERSECTION PE—RI AM +COMMA +PRE MacArthur Blvd. & 1.18 Bison Ave. AM Peak 0.97 1.18 PM Peak 0.74 0.90 0.90 - Jamboree Rd. & 0.66 - Bison Ave. PM Peak 0.54 0.66 10 f f n1 TABLE 6 CRITICAL INTERSECTION IDENTIFICATION Pac-Tel Site - Medical Office PM PEAK 2.5 HOUR PERCENTAGES VACATION N _ EB WB Bristol St. & Campus Dr. - Irvine Ave. - - Bristol St. & Birch St. - - Bristol St. & Jamboree Rd. 0.3 0.1 0.3 - Bristol St. N. & Campus Dr. - - - Bristol St. N. & Birch St. - - - - Bristol St. N. & Jamboree Rd. 0.2 0.1 - - MacArthur Blvd. & Ford Rd. 0.3 0.3 - 0.3 MacArthur Blvd. & Bison Ave. 0.3 0.2 4.0 - Jamboree Rd. & MacArthur Blvd. - - 0.2 0.1 MacArthur Blvd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.3 0.4 - 0.4 MacArthur Blvd. & • San Miguel Dr. 0.3 0.3 - Jamboree Rd. & Bison Ave. 0.3 0.3 - 4.0 Jamboree Rd. & East Bluff Dr. - Ford Rd. 0.3 0.5 - - Jamboree Rd. & East Bluff N. - University 0.3 0.2 - - 6y TABLE 7 ICU SUMMARY Pac-Tel Site - Medical Office ICIr yALIIEs MMT1NG EXISTING +REGIONAL STING +REGIONAL +COMMITTED ERISTING +REGIONAL +COMMITTED +PROJECT INTERSECTION PERIOD (1990) +COMMIID MacArthur Blvd. & 0.91 0.80 Bison Ave. PM Peak 0.74 0.90 ,Jamboree Rd. & 0.67 Bison Ave. PM Peak 0.54 0.66 63 12 t 01 —I1- SITE ACCESS ON-SITE CIRCULATION AND PARKING Since no specific site plan has been provided, no review of traffic factors related to access, on-site circulation or parking have been completed. These items will require review when a specific plan and use are submitted. SITMMARY This study has reviewed traffic factors related to the development of the Pac-Tel Site as required by the City of Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance. Estimates were made of trips to be generated by the project for both general office and medical office uses and the impact ofthese trips evaluated in terms of the Ordinance. No intersections were found to be impacted by the general office project and improvements would be required for medical office use. Principal findings of the study are the following: 1. General office use would generate an estimated 50 AM peak hour trip ends and 45 PM peak hour trip ends while medical office use would generate an estimated 15 AM peak hour trip ends and 90 PM peak hour trip ends. 2. Of the 14 intersections evaluated, two did not pass the "One Percent" test required by the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. 3. With general office use, both intersections would'have ICU values less than 0.90 or not be changed with project traffic. 4. With medical office -use, the intersection of MacArthur/Bison would require . improvement. 13 ! • =12— MITIGATION MEIIuSURES The following measure are recommended to mitigate potential traffic impacts of the project. 1. Add a northbound through lane on MacArthur at Bison if medical office use is proposed. (This is a current CalTrans project.) 2. Review access, on-site circulation and parking when specific plan is available. We trust that this study will be of assistance to you and the City of Newport Beach. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, WESTON PRINGLE 6c ASSOCIATES W AV Weston-S. Pringle, P.E. Registered Professional Engineer State of California Numbers C16828 & TR565 WSP:hd #4109E b5 APPENDIX A ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS - GENERAL OFFICE (�6 �5 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST/CAMPUS DR—IRVINE AV (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage inter pring 90 AM Peak 211 Hour Approved projected too of Projected Project Regional Projects peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Approach Existing Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 24 Hour volume VOID Direction Peak 2h Hour volume volume volume volume D Northbound 3980 «z A 4Q"` O 55 Zl8 81 f5 Southbound iao8 E D _ Eastbound 6848 D O Westbound 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 21,2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. b1 DATE: PROJECT: FORM I �6 v � 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST/CAMPUS DR—IRVINE AV (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Inter pring 90 PM Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of ProjectedEPepak me ject Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2y Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak :h Hour �'y HourVolume Volume Volume Volumeme / Q Northbound 2587 � �8 21�0t5 �Z//�/7O/ 2�� Sou 2889 �3� 4QS .J"IIOE�O7 JS Eastbound [� �p 75� f �O O i 0 Westbound U 63 m{ Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Lb1 Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2� Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection, Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. r4 DATE: PROJECT: • en nu r 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST/BIRCH ST 90 (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage nter pring FAN Peak 2$ Hour Approved Projected 1� of Pro�Rcted Project I Regional Projects peak 2k Hour Peak 24 Hour Approach Existing Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 24 Hour Volume Volume Direction Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume ! I Volume Northbound 1107 Southbound 4662 c, r Eastbound ,Q i O v , O Westbound 0 Q Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2), Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. 6�1 DATE: i8 PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis CH SBRISTOL ST/BIR .T Intersection M (Existing Traffic Volumes based on AMrage In er pr ng _ Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Protect Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peek 2y Hour Peet/ lumeour Peak ; ur Volume Volume Volume Volume i I Northbound 587 I O Sout hbound 4 1792 , Eastbound 4030 � Westbound Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2)1 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2-� Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (IiC.U. ) Analysis is required. r DATE: PROJECT: FnRM 1 19 i 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST/JAMBOREE RD (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage n er pring IQ AM Peak 2)5 Hour Approved Projected l� of Projected Project Regional Projects Peak 24 Hour Peak 24 Hour Approach Existing Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Direction Peak 24 Hour Volume volume Volume Volume Co443 4 Northbound 5389 1 4 O,Z° Southbound t7O� Eastbound 6337 d 76A 1 -7& Westbound 0 O O k d project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Pea Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. DATE: yO. PROJECT: FORM I • Ya ♦A 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST/JAMBOREE RD (Existing Traf fic Volumes based on Average Winter pr ng 19 2_0) PM Peak 2k Hour Approved Project Regional Il Re Projects Projected' 1� Projected Peak 2y Hour Approach Existing Peak 24 Hour Peak 2y,Hour Penk 2$ Hour Volume I Direction Peak 2)1 Hour Growth Volum Volume Volume Volume Volume I I d I f1.2a�o Co�IB � 1 I Northbound 5427 f _ J 2 2 Southbound 2117 �oq' (0 Eastbound 5977 >` t58 , O Westbound 0 U O t�I Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% 'of Projected IcU Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is -estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2)1 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis is ( I.C.U. ) required. �2 DATE: 2J PROJECT: FORM I Volume 1% Traffic Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST N CAMPUS DR (Existing Traffic Volumes basea on Avurage ninter pring 90 AM Peak 2's Hour Approved protected 1X of Pro�eeted Project Regional projects Peek 2$ Hour Peak 2$ Hour Approach Existing Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour k2hH Volume Direction PeaYo1u Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Q8 Northbound 4602• 159 475� 0 Southbound 0 Eastbound O � Q o 0 . Westbound 2284 r�l Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected I� Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 23, Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 7� DATE: PROJECT: FORM I • . T a ye y 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection umBRSSTOL ST N CAMPUS DR (Existing Traffic Voles ase on AVerage nter. pr ng ir 90 PM Peak 24 Hour our ADProved Approach Existing Regional Projects Protected 1� of Projected Project ou Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peek 2y Hour Peak 2�S.Hour Peevol�Hour I Peevolume Volume Volume Volume Volume I Northbound 3106 4 southbound 8 25� Olt i O O Eastbound 0 v Westbound 6206 7�0 7CD O Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 77 DATE: L 13 PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST N BIRCH ST (Existing Traffic Volumes basedon verage inter pring O AM Peak 2)1 Hour Approves projected I: of Projected Project Regional projects Peek 2y Hour Peek 2h Hour Approach Existing Peak 2►1 Hour Peak Zy Hour Volume Volume Direction Peak 24 Hour Voles Volume Volume Volume Northbound 3119 O 3464 35 ' Southbound 1 103 10` 897 O Eastbound 0 Westbound 2634 32GY� 3Z Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 23, Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity dltilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. �5 DATE: .L.4 PROJECT: FORM I 7 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis N BIRCH ST Intersection SRISTOL ST / InTr er rin M (Existing Traffic Volumes basedon verage n P 9 — t Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1:Peak Protected Project Direction Peak 24 Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak 2y Hour Peay luumee 4 Hour PenVolueour Volume Volume Volume ��ttVolume [ I,J Northbound �� '"i `t8 1314 southbound 3645 3940 3`� Q Eastbound � Q Westbound rMvi Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected l& Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. -76 DATE: yti PROJECT: 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection gRISTOL ST N/JAMBORE tee pr'ing AM (Existing Traffic Volumes basedon YMP — Peak 211 Hour Approved 1% of Projected Project Regional Projects Projected Peak 2k Hour Peak 24 Hour Approach Existing Growth volume 24 Hour Peak 24 N ur Volume i Volume Direction Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume 91x1 Northbound 7971 Zq� �� _mot Southbound 1545' � G~SO 25 O 0 Eastbound 0 i d O WestboundProj 0 Peak Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Pea Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2;fi Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization El (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. -71 DATE: �b PROJECT: FORM I • � Y t .Y h 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST N JAMBOREE RD (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Average nter pring 9 90 PM Peak 2k Hour Approved I Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1� of Projected Pro�eet Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak 24 Hour PeaYoi�ur Peako2�HoUr Volume Volume Volume Volume � o Northbound 6961 2 SC?zZ ^8 Southbound a'' A 3780 Eastbound Q i 0 0 ' 0- 0 — Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic 'Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: 17 PROJECT: FORM I _ � 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR WFORD RA (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage n er pring o AM Peak 211 Hour Approved 1; of Projected Project Regional Projects Projected Peak 2� Hour Peek 2k Hour Approach Existing 6roeth Peek 211 Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Direction Peak 24 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Co795 Northbound 5381 � Southbound 4700 8 Q 312 3 Eastbound 3 2 Westbound 1972Proj p 2123 2 Peak Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Pea Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: FORM I I � 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BL FORD RD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average W1 116r114ro -5 y_Q PM Peak 2h Hour Approved Projected 1w, of Projected Project e Approach Existing Regional Projects Peak 2y Hour Peak 24 Hour Direction Peak 24 Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak Zh Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 4708' q7Z 5'S4 55 • �•I Z gq SZ 85 Southbound 6737 0.20 Eastbound 594 `2 ' Westbound 1207 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. �0 DATE: y1 PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MA R HU nter PriR9 2Q At+i (Existing Traffic Volumes ace on verage Peak 2k Hour Approves Pro30CtEd 1% of Projected Project Regional Projects Peak 24 Hour Peak 2h Hour Approach Existing Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak 2§ Hour youft i volume Direction Peak 24 Hour volume voluft volume volume -- ! 20 a.2° Northbound 6683 10503 10 j(p south bound 4844 1 '7 c Eastbound 490 Westbound Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume to be greater than 1 outP1°zat on Project Traffic is estimated Peak 2� Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Wacity Lot (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. • gl • DATE: 3D PROJECT: FORM I 1uu t t 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR B B (Existing Traffic Volumesbasedon verage nter pr ng . 90) PM Peak 2k Hour Approved JA,proachnxisting Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 21s Hour Peak 24 Nour PeaY � ur ' Pee�o,§ Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume 4095S5 85g `�"� 0��7047 �(�938 ( 5 O ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected IVI Peak 23, Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: 3� PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BL/SAN JOAQUIN HILLS RD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Avclov, In er pring 90 AM Peak 24 Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project Regional Projects Peak 24 Hour Approach Existing Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Direction Peak 2iy Hour Growth Volume Volume Volume ! Volume Volume �37 '35q 5034 SO Northbound 4043 /�. 01 Southbound 4055 S0k5 5 Eastbound 531 O 0 s � o Mestbdund 2202 ProjPeak Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Pea Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2.x, Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. DATE: 3Y PROJECT: FORM I • • e s v. ( a 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BL/SAN JOAQUIN HILLS RD PM (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on er vage 1nter pr ng _ Peak 2h Hour ApprovedProject Regional Projects Projected 1�Peak Projeeted Peak 2k Hour Approach Existing Growth Peak 2y Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak lu Hour Vol we Direction Peak 2k Hour volume volume Volume i Volume Volume 3`�87 4G1 4- 0. 1% Northbound 3265 51� Southbound 5442 Eastbound 2« J 2-� O 2054 � Westbound Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. k7 DATE: PROJECT: FORM I 33 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/BISON AV (Existing Traffic Volumes ase On verage �n er pring 90 AM Peak 2h Hour Approved projected 1% of Projected Project Regional Projects Peak 24 Hour Peek 2k Hour Approach Existing Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Direction Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume ! Northbound 3746 h ^C� South bound 3 7 Eastbound 334 �-i 7"/o Westbound 0 1 4— rvI Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected lLv Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 21-2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: FORM I ni. 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD BISON AV (Existing Traffic Volumes basedon Verage nter prang 90 PM Peak 2y Hour Approved projected 1w, of Projected Project Approach Existing Regional Projects Direction Peek 24 Hour Growth Peek 24 Hour Peak Hour Pend lumeour I Peak lumeour Volume Volume Volume ume Northbound 4 619 140 Southbound 4346 I3Z 55v4 55 o.�.a . Eastbound 217 � 5 i ' (� c ' Westbound 568 to 6-7 7 - d 3.o ! Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Lai Peak 2? Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. DATE: D 6 PROJECT: 35 FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/MACARTHUR BL (Existing Traffic Volumes based on verage inter pring19 90) AM KPeak 2+a Hour Approved protected 1: of Protected Protect ApproachExisting Regional protects Peak 2k Hour Peek 2k Hour ak 2 Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume �^Voo�lume Volume Volume( 2795 "C'?0 ��1834 5�0 1�919 ZO2575 �� Project Traffic ,is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2�2 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: FORM I 3 6 i 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD MACARTHUR BL (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Hier pring 90 PM Peak 2y Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected ProjecHour t Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2§ Hour Peak ur Penvoluume11 PeaVolume Volume Volume Volume volume Northbound 1496 Southbound 2693 8z 34c�8 Eastbound 7 qS3 420 Z��Z I —7 O 1 ab Westbound 3138 . 4z 47 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 23-, Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: 37 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BL SAN MIGUEL DR (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Avurov= Inter pring aA AM lume Peak 2k Hour Approved ProtectedProtected Project Approach Existing Regional Protects Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2$ Hour PeaYo2 ur PeaVo� ur PenVol Hour Volume Volume Volume ss-za 5� ' 2 - 6.2, Northbound 4631 73� Sorthbound 39 �1 0.1 v 2 7 0 i i Eastbound 412 �3Z Westbound 667 �91 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 23k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. �y DATE: PROJECT: FORM I 3� 132, 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR 'SL/SAN MIGUEL DR PM (Existing Traffic Volumes basec on verage inter pring _ Peak 24 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1�Peak Projected Project Direction Peak 24 Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak 24 Hour PenVoll1ume PeeVoly�Hour Volume Volume volume Volume i I o Northbound 2418 38� 294� L(g Southbound 3908 �« [� Eastbound 2111 i Cod Cc 7 Westbound 662 D i4 K7I Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected W4 Peak 23-2 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization El (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. i qa DATE: 34 PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD EASTB?�U�F_DR R (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage winterping ly �Q! AM Peak 2h Hour Approved 1% of Projected Project Regional Projects Projected Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Approach Existing Groxth Peak 24 Hour Peak 211 Hour Volume i Volume Direction Peak 21, Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume 0 QS�Cfl 49 ! I .3° Northbound 3904 (►� 41 q- 6•,�o 2 4�- 3361 iC7� 0 Southbound l ( � Eastbound 1081 0 .-, IOU► ►D Westbound 998Proj (� Peak Traffic is estimateVolumed to be less than 1% of Projected Pea Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2� Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 91 DATE: �D PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/EASTSLUFF DR—FORD RD PM (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage nter(Spring, _ Peak 24 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Peak P24 roject tour Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak Hour Peame k Hour Peak Volume Volume Volume olume Northbound 4812 kA(a 7 2 'aogo 5-75 b.) South6ound 4040 ( 2z ( Z s2154 53 O Eastbound 1194 D Westbound 1-7 500 D �7 S ' V �( Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1t of Projected 1�51 Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected, Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. . Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/EASTBLUFF DR N—UNIVERSITY SITY R (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage inter ring p Peak 2h Hour Approved projected 1% of Projected Project Regional Projects Peak 24 Hour Peak 2k Hour Approach Existing Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2's Hour Volume Volume Direction Peak Volume Hour Volume Volume Volume �__--r- Vo,ume 52 . Northbound 4181 t27 I L(7 .3° 81 48 0 Southbound 3753 ( 914 q/ 0 0 Eastbound ( ( ! 1136 �4 0 westbound 0 2 i?j55 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Project Peak Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. �13 DATE: 0, PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/EASTBLUFF DR—UNIVERSITY DR (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage inter pring 90 PM Peak 2h Hour Approved Projected 10, of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak Pen Approach Existing Regional Projects Vo2h Hour volume Volume volume Volume �{ Northbound �oS 57 /Z 4782 �'Q5 _ Southbound 5311 � �� 121� �0�085 �07 �•� ��o O Eastbound 825 d 33 85g ' westbound 1016 ry Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected LAJ Peak 2� Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2� Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. 9� 'DATE: PROJECT: _FORM I APPENDIX B INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS GENERAL OFFICE �5 Y KA4995AN INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD 6 BISON AVENUE 4995 1990 AN EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING--..-..-•.-.-..- -.- ....................................................................... I I EXISTING IPROPOSEDI EXISTING IEXISTINGI REGIONAL ICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED +PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes 1 PK MR I WC 1 GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVOtume I V/C I ICapaoity1Cspacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Projectl I Ratio I I i I Volume I I I I I I I I . .... ................................................................. I I----------------- 159 .... ( I I 110 10'.( 1 I NL 1 1600 I I I 1 �} r7� LL 3��. y"�. �- •NT --1--.3200 1_.......i... el 3017 i...0.94 * &YeI-I I��...�.'..'.!..*-!.......!'.�.! ........................ I NR 'I -_..._.1. 1 32 I I 1 0 1 1 I I _ .......................................................................1 � - St. - i _-_.._.i_ I I I I p I I 1 I .........................................................................i 1---'------------- 2192 0.34 1 1a I, ST i 6400 I I I I 1 ( 02 1 0, Lb I I------------------------•-- .........._. --------------------------a.....----- SR I N.S. 1 I 2281 1 I (0�- I I Q...�.......I •EL -• •3200 ............................................................. . I I I I 95 1 0.03 • 1 a'7._.I o.0 4-! 12 10.0 1 •--------------•---------------.._..... .................... I ET I . .... I I I I 1 0 i I I I ....... ER I N.S. I I 111 l I l a l I 1 3 I ........................................................................ j�- WL ............. I I I 1 8 I. .............. I I I .................................................. .. ..... I..... T I. . . I. I I I 1 0 1 I I I -------i--------I--------'----------------- ----------------------------------------------I I + I i i 0.97 I.......j IEXISTING ......................... ..- i.._._._. -----------------------•------ 1............................................................................ l (EXIST + REG GROWTH + CCNMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 'I.C.U. I '. ($ P ................................................................................i (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. ...U_J_._-I ................................................................................. 1_1 Project + project traffic I.C.U. will be Less then or equal to 0.90 I_1'Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greeter than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements wilt be less than I.C.U. without project ........................ ................................................................. Description Of system improvement: FORM I1 PROJECT 96 KA4995PM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD i BISON AVENUE 4995 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING ....-_- 1990.PN- ---------------------- i iEXISTINGIPROPOSEDiEXISTINGIEXISTiNGIREGIONALICONMITTEDi PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVolune I WC I ICapacity1Capacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume !w/o Project) i Ratio I I I I I I I I Volume ............................................................................i IHL I 1600 1 i ls9 1 0.10 1 120 21Ba 0.68 i i Q HT 1 320o I I I ' 3�5 131 S3 1 83 �'` - - -- -- - - --•---------------------------------------------------- I --- - I--_---•-1- 1 1 I I O ( I I I .............. ---------------------------------------------------"'--._ I SL I I I I I 1 0 1 1 t I ►---------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------I I ST 1 6400 1 1 3157 1 0.49 1 49 g I 1 10 .-1 0:(A0 1 Iv•(00l .SR.._i_..N.S..i_..-.._.i._..169----------------------------- ---- -----------------------i__......i_"_. ..I" ._!....-..1 I EL I 3200 1 I 182 I 0.06 * 1 50 10, 0 7 r7 1 0.0 ------------------------------------------------- ----_.-.._.-I j- ET I ^ "I I I I 1 0 1 1 1 _•-_-----_--•--__•-----___•_••__•_------- -• _..ER -•I_' N.S. 1 1 176 1 1 1 32 1 19 1 1 .__--_-'............................ ...................................! W� I I I I I 1 0 1 1 1 I -----------------------------------------------------------------------I I WT I I I I I ! 0 1 1 1 i ----'--------•-----------------•--------_-- ---------------.._..__._I I vR I _ I I I I I © I I I i ---------------------------- --_-------_-"-----I i EXISTING """"'-"-'-'-'-'.._.._i 0.74 I ----------------------•_--------------•---------_-----•- i (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 Q ,RO I I ------------------------------------------------------- ..-..--..-..-_----1 (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U..•--.--_•-----_-_--.•-..._..1 O_. 01 .......................... ............................ .... ... 1_1 Project + Project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be Less than or equal to 0.90 1_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project isprovements will be less then I.C.U. without project .................................................... Description of system improvement: FORM II PROJECT � 141 1 JA487OPM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD L BISON STREET 4870 1990 PM EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED OW AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING _.-•-` ._....._...'........................................................................... I EXISTING IPROPOSEDIEXISTINGI EXISTING IREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED I PROJECT IPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I WC I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IValume I V/C l I ICapacitylCapaeityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 1w/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume 1 1 I - ....._..i_..__...i_.. '..`...... . RL 1 1600 ' 2r 0.02 1 � L0-021 . . ......._...i.._.----i"'• .........L.�......................................... MT 1695 S-5 I A��y 't �(.1..... . L{ix— I----- ) 4800 ------------------) 0.38 •...._... "_ I NR - 1 1 126 .......__!.I l /5 3..._.._...1 ---•________________•-_-____-•--........._.._... _ ...SL..i...3200 1 1 1so 1 0.05 • 120 1 0. 00 2 Dy ..................................... I_..ST. _1 4800 1 1 1767 1 0.37 1 5-+ 1 A 93.1 0: +g I............... ________________ : !.......I-G-`- i • ..:....................................... I EL ---------- i........I 1s I .._...) .___._...�_.._... ..__.._I Et 1600 i I 54 0.05 • I 2. 1 0-07 1:;• 0 j 11'k ........................., 12 1 I I ....................................... ...............................1 LWL 1 1600 1 I 93 1 0.06 • I /, 3 10. 0 7 1......10 ��. -- WT 1 1600 I 1 70 1 0.04 I 11 l D. 0 4' 1 16-04 ...------'-'......'----••-----•..._.....--•-------'•............................... WR I 3200 I 1 83 1 0.03 1 1 41 1 p. 04- I It-o I -------- - ---------------------------------------------------- (EX(STING-•.........................i_•_0.54 I ...............1 -------------------------------•-•------------- ----•- REC i EXIST- EG •-' E%1ST * GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I0•(0(4 I 1 • (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. -•.-•-•-•--••-----.---•---•IO:(afol ......................................................... ... 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to o.90 I_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 'Projected,+ project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be Less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less then I.C.U. without project ... ...................................................................................... Description of system improvement: . FORM II PROJECT y� APPENDIX C ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS r MEDICAL OFFICE �e 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST/CAMPUS DR—IRVINE AV (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage 19 Inter pring 90 PM i Peak 24 Hour Approved of Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1penk 24 Projected Peek 2kcHour Directlap Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour PeaYo�'kHeur Volume i Volume me Volume /Volume Volume Northbound 2587 / ` 2&6- ?V 3o Southbound 2889 2 / /f�- !� Eastbound (' �IC/ `7 5, 29 'Westbound O Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) 'Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: FORM I 0 ! 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST/BIRCH ST 14 (Existing Traffic Volumes aseWinter/Springon verage 19 _ Peak 2)1 Hour Approved Protected It of Projected Project Approach Existing Regional Projects peak 2§ Hour Peak 2y Hour Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2§ Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume volume Volume Volume volume Volume i Northbound 587 © _�/ ^ Southbound 1792 n Eastbound 4030 Westbound © G Q V Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2;1Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected El Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. col DATE: ' SU PROJECT: FORM I 7 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST/JAMBOREE RD (Existing Traffic 'Volumes based 'on VVerage -inter pr ng 9D) PM Peak 2h Hour Approved I Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Pent ;y No Pea�o�1y Hour ' PeaVotumeour Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound / � ' 0. a� Southbound 2117 I/8� l.�Q 72 0.3 Eastbound 5977 O O ; 0 Westbound 0 Project Traffic is estimated to 'be less than, 1% of Projected Peak 23, Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2)1 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. boy DATE: yr PROJECT: FORM I I I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST N CAMPUS DR (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage inter pring TO 90 PM Peak 2+s Hour Approved It of Projected Project I Regional Projects Projected peek 2$ Hour Peek 2k Hour Approach Existing Growth Peak 2§ Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Direction Peak 2;1 Hour Volume volume volume Volume 2 Northbound 3106 3i D southbound / i O Eastbound 0 /0 O / Westbound 6206 v / 4,- Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2;k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. fa3 DATE: 5� PROJECT: FORM I t n4 • • 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST N/BIRCH ST M (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage inter Spring _ Peak 24 Hour Approved Projected 1� of Projected Protect Approach Existing Regional Projects Direction Peak 2$ Hour Growth Peak ur Peevolkueour Peed lumebur ! Peak lumeeour Volume Volume it Northbound 1314 0 ` — i Q O Sorthbound 3645 O 0 Eastbound Q Q D O y �12d Westbound � L Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2), Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Uti:lization (.I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: h3 FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST N JAMBOREE RD 90 PM (Existing Traffic Volumes basedon verage inter pring Peak 2)y Hour Approved projected 1� of Protected Project I Regional Projects Peek 2y Hour Peak 2k Hour Approach Existing Peak 21. Hour Peak 2k Hour Va1ufi8 Volume Direction Peak 2$ Hour Growth Volume Volume Volume volume //�� Xn I /9 �y n I Northbound 2 ' V J�v J 2-�� V ` 6961 4 Q Southbound 3780 I Eastbound 1 Westbound (0/ Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2;k Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k,Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization, (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. �DS DATE,: PROJECT: FORM I Z3 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTSUR SL FORD RD (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on M-age nter. pr ng �Q PM Peak 2y Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Peak 2k'Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 24 Hour Direction Peak 24 Hour Vc1 volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound (O! �� l J^ r i a•i O 4708 Southbound 6737 Eastbound 594 Westbound 1207 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. �p6 DATE: 55 PROJECT: FORM I volume 1% Traffic Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR B B (Existing Traffic VolumesbaseQ on ver erage int pring 90 PM Peak 2y Hour Approved 1% of Projecte Projected d Project Regional Projects Peak 2k Hour Peak 211 Hour Approach Existing Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2's Hour Volume Volume Direction Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume' Volume Volume /I �/ 5409 Q / � Northbound �� 8 a.2 Southbound 7047 �� Eastbound 938 � � �� � Q i llestbound O 0- Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 21� Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: • 56 PROJECT: FORM I 14G 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BL/SAN JOAQUIN HILLS RD PM (Existing Traf fic Volumes basedon Average n er pring _ Peek 24 Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project, Approach Existing Regional Projects Peak 2y Hour Peak 2k Hour Direction Peak 24 Hour Growth PeeVollume PeaVollume r Volume i Volume Volume Volume 3 Y7 4d J North bound �J L 3265 n Southbound 5442 v� �Y �q 0 01 Eastbound 0 2054 Westbound 960 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2)1 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2;j Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 108 DATE: PROJECT: 5 7 FORM I '�e • 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD BISON AV (Existing Traffic Volumes based on verage WIn erI sp—rl—ng—ff90 PM Peak 211 Hour Approved 1% of Projected Project Regional Projects Projected Peak 24 Hour Peak 2h Hour Approach Existing YoluMe Volume Peak 2�S Hour Peak 2k Hour Direction Peak 21, Hour Growth Volume Volume volume Volume rI 4619 D / 3 J� Northbound �J y South bound 4346 Eastbound 7 i Westbound 568 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2: Hour Traffic Volume. , Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: FORM I 5g i 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD MACARTHUR BL (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage n er prtng 90 PM Peak 2k Hour Approved Projected IS of Projected Project Approach Existing Regional Projects peek 2k Hour Peak Ey Hour Direction Peak 2y Hour Grov�th Peek 2k Hour PeeVollueour Volume volume Volume Volume volume O Northbound 1496 Southboun 23�0 d � �2 �/y�O �Z ' •d ! 37 O • 2693 2� Eastbound �3 t7 / �` Z" Westbound 3138 / Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected f Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume ✓✓✓✓ o be greater than 1% of Projected Traffic is estimated t 9 Project Peak 2� Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1/0 DATE: 5ti PROJECT: FORM I I no 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BL/SANMMIGUEL DR PM (Existing Traffic Volumes ash on verage in er pring _ Peak 2), Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project Regional Projects peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Approach Existing Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Volume Volume Volume . i5v �99 a3 Northbound 2418 1 Southbound 3908 Eastbound11717 Westbound 66 2 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. l� l DATE: bO PROJECT: FORM I 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/EASTBLUFF DR—FORD RD , M (Existing Traffic Volumes Dase on verage n er pring ,_ Peak 211 Hour Approved Projected 10. of Projected Project Approach Existing Regional Project Peak 2y Hour Peak 2k Hour Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak lumeour Volume, i Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 4812 Southbound 4040 Eastbound O 1194 O Westbound SDoProject Peak Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of' Projected Pea Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 21, Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. rl � DATE: 6) PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/EASTBLUFF DR—UNIVER I DR (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Inter pring 20) PM Peak 21, Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected Project Regional Projects peak 14 Hour Peak 2y Hour Approach Existing Peak 216 Hour Peak 24 Hour Volume Volume Direction Peak 24 Hour Vcl�whh Volume Volume ! Volume / g 1�94 Northbound 4782 �,n I Southbound 5 311 ' Eastbound 825 Westbound 1016 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2� Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization El (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. li3 DAT : 6?- PROJECT: FORM I ;�•• •, r Sri rr . • APPENDIX D INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS MEDICAL OFFICE �'� 63 KA4995PK INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD Z BISON AVENUE 4995 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VINTER/SPRING1990 PM. .......................................................................-------------- I IEXISTINGIPRDPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICO MITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI 1Movementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVotume I V/C I I ICapaeitylCapseityt Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 1w/o Projectl I Ratio I I I i I I I I I Volume I I I --------------------.------.---...-----...-------------.....----------.-------------------- I NL 1 1600 1 1 159 1 0.10 1 1 ZO 1 C) - // 1 'O..!0_/Z --------------' I MT 1 3200 1 1 2188 I 0.68 •*545- /3/ . I d.63* 10, 72)M -----------------------------•------- ----- ---- I NFL ..I...- - I I 1 0 1 1 1 I- --i------- i.__.....i._......i-----------------'--------i-..-..---------------------I SL I I ..I ----------------------------------------------¢qF� IQ**-------_-- ------------ ST 1 6400 I 1 3157 1 0.49 ( I 1 10.(00 I 10,GO I ...__.. SR I N.S. I I 169 I I 1 22. I I op I I ............................................................:............I 1 •EL'"1"'3200 I 1 182 1 0.06 • I $0 I /() I0•DO * 1------------------------------------- '-................................ I ET i I I I I I Q I I I I I------------------------------.---------------------------------------------------- .......I ER I N.S. I 1 176 1 I 132 1 . I (2 1 1 .--_----I--------------------------i--------i--------i-----...-I -----------..._.........._ WL ------- .._ --------.------ ...I 0 1 1 1 1 ----------------------------------------- I WR I I I I I 1 0 I I I I ----------------------------------------------------I IEXISTINC __________________________i- -0.74 I I 1---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0 . °f 0 1 I .--_--_•-------------------------------••_•__---•_------------------------------I 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U-----------------'---_-'..-._1O- ........................................................ ..... 1_1 Project • project traffic I.C.U. wilt be less then or equal to 0.9D 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systen improvement wilt be Less than or equal to 0.90 i_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements wilt be less than I.C.U. without project ................................. ....................................................... Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM 11 I15 141 6y JA487OPM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD I BISON STREET 4870 1990 PH EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICGHHITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVollme I V/C I Yoluae Ratio Volune me lw/o Projectl I, Ratio I I I IcapacitrICapaeitr I I I VOIU I Volune I I I I I I l I I WL I. 16001 I 251 0.021 1 0 1 0. 02 0,02—I I ....................................I I NT 1 1 1695 1 5/ 1 �5' 4800 -.---------------- 0.38 *-----------------'- - � �_._..... MR i I 126 I 1 I S I I �so 0.05 '0('kL- SLszoo i i -- .. ... _.. 2.....�. : ST- l 4800 1 1 J767 1 0.37 15 I PI3 10 .`-9...�_.._.._��: .. ...................................... ........................'- ...SR..;...1600 1 1 60 1 0.04 1 1 0 1 0. 04- 1 -_.--'•-----------------'......_....__.._._... -......-- ---.._...._. • EL 1 I t5 1 15 1 ..!_ f I I ET 1600 1 1 54 0.05 ' I ? I 0.07 1_...... .a I'I .................... ........... 12 1 I I I l WL 1600 I 93 l .... . 1 r.................................I Il ........... .. .... . ........ I ---ur ._j ------ I 7o I o.04 I I I Q'. 04 1 10.0¢l ----WR..i_--3200 l--------I-----83 1---0.03-1----....!.-4-'..._1 O. O!t__.!.......10:04- (EXISTING .-.-•..-.---»i.. 0.54 L..._.. .--..'._.. _1 EXIST + REG GROWTH COMMITTED- -•• -- - - - I + W/PROPOSED IMPROVE I.C.U. 10.�� I .---_.-•...........................................................I (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.............................................................._........ 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems lmprovement will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project ........................------------------------ *------...._..... Description of system 1aQrovmient: FORM II PROJECT b� H9 APPENDIX E INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSES WITH IMPROVEMENTS MEDICAL OFFICE i 1 166. < KA4995PH INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: MACARTNUR BOULEVARD i BISON AVENUE 4995 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING . 1990 PM .-••-- _ I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI lMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio 1Volume I V/C I I lCapacitylCapaoityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume lw/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I i I ML 1 1600 1....__._!..._159 1 -.0.__.1 1 10 1 0 I MT I 3200 I(3-)gbcd 218E ( 0.68 'z��i / :93- 5 .' I--------------- /� iMR I I I ......_..._........._._......0 ...............................I l �sl .i_...._ .i._.._.._i- I I I Q I .----•-----•-----•--------... •-•........................!.......!.......j l 640D , 9g l to o �o I ST l 640D I ( 315T l 0.49 l /� 1 1 ,..--------------------- ..g.. SR I N 5:... I 9 1 1 1 2-Z 1 I 1 1 l .._.. I I I 3200 1 I 182 l 0.06 • I50 10• 0 7 0 1 (7... I --------------------------------------•-------------•---------------- ? j ET I - I I I I 1 0 1 1 1 1 l' I•--•----'--------i-------- --------------------....... ......................................................../2 ER M.S. I I I 19J..........:................. ...... WL --l- --------------•-----------------------...........-. ••----.............. --•---- --I I WR I I I I I 1 0 1 1 I i .--•-------------------------------------------.........................................I (EXISTING 1 0.T4 1 •---•----•----•--------------•--..-._........................... (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I 0, go I --•-------------------------------------•".......................................I (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. 10 a ................................................................................. 1-1 Project + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.9D 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater then 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement wilt be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less then I.C.U. without project Description of system improvement: l/T.rr vl&41- PROJECT FORM, 11 /r 1 b'1 14'f FASHION ISLAND ENTITLEMENT TRANSFER TPO DRAFT November 1990 ®r®AWrXScO!/ST ASSOC/ATE$ M Draft FASHION ISLAND ENTITLEMENT TRANSFER TPO Prepared for: City of Newport Beach Prepared by: Austin-Foust Associates 2020 N. Tustin Avenue Santa Ana, California 92701 November 1, 1990 rya CONTENTS Page Project Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Trip Generation and Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 TrafficImpacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Conclusions 10 Appendix 1 > LIST OF FIGURES Page S IProject Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2 Proposed Site Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3 Project Trip Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 ii I�y H LIST OF TABLES Page 1 Trip Generation Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2 Approved Projects Summary • • • • • • • • . • . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3 One-Percent Analysis Summary 9 iii + y 3 • Y 11 t\ PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project consists of 19,560 square feet of retail space to be located in the Fashion Island parking lot on the southwest corner of Santa Rosa Drive and Newport Center Drive in the city of Newport Beach. Of the 19,560 square feet, 6,060 square feet are currently approved for Fashion Island, and the remaining 13,500 feet are to be transferred from an approved project _ at Bison and Camelback. Figure 1 illustrates the project site, and Figure 2 illustrates the proposed site plan. MacArthur Boulevard is a major north-south arterial which connects to several freeways in the project vicinity. Jamboree Road provides north-south access to .the vicinity and is designated as a major arterial on the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). Bristol Street and the Corona Del Mar Freeway (SR-73) provide east-west access to the project vicinity. TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION Appropriate trip generation rates for the proposed project were obtained from the City of Newport Beach peak hour rates for general retail uses. An average inbound rate of.7 trips/I'SF and an outbound rate of .5 trips/I'SF for a total of 1.2 tripsfMF were utilized for the peak one hour AM period. For the peak one hour PM period, the average rates are 1.5 tripsfMF inbound and 2.0 tripsfMF outbound, for a total of 3.5 trips/I'SF. These rates and the resulting project trip generation are summarized in Table 1. As this summary indicates, the proposed project will generate 16 trips in the AM peak hour and 47 trips in the PM peak hour. The trip generation was factored to obtain a peak 2.5 hour volume for the AM and PM peak periods. The peak 2.5 hour volumes were based on an estimated factor of 2.0 to account for the extension of the usual one-hour peak period. Credit is given to the project for existing traffic generated at the project site. Since the proposed project consists of an entitlement transfer credit is given to the project by omitting the approved project at Bison and Camelback from the cumulative project list. Consequently, there is no reduction in project-generated traffic. Fashlon Island Entitlement Transfer 1 Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. tZ� b •fit •�* t5 O�YON >J BRISTOL k Oa,P a t v MESA i CA OAq� 1'qy O MAR BISON P \ 9 E s t 2 rya zzue PROJECT SITE P ass a SAN S I S7A 1 � gARBAB/� R o OR 94 0 no < BA•I'DE •_ Figure 1 PROJECT LOCATION Fashion Island Entitlement Transfer 2 Auslin•Foust Associates, Inc. .eW a.W aH• nW a..• ah' nW ur W I d 3 4 t � r' RetailPad' f /+ L• W a b• alp Figure 2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN Fashion island Entitlement Transfer 3 Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. Table 1 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY - — ---AM PEAK-- —.—PM PEAK-- LAND USE SIZE IB OB TOTAL IB OB TOTAL General Retail 13.5 TSF Trips(ISF .7 .5 1.2 1.5 2.0 3.5 Trip Generation 9 7 16 20 27 47 Project Peak 2S-Hour Trip Generation 18 14 32 40 54 94 Fashion Island Entitlement Transfer 4 Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. � y� 0 • 1 y I Distribution of project-generated traffic was derived from observed travel patterns in the vicinity of the project site as well as, from locations and levels of development in relation to the location of the proposed project. Ten percent of project-generated traffic is assumed to travel between destinations within Newport Center and will not impact any of the study intersections during the AM and PM peak periods. The general trip distribution is illustrated in Figure 3. TRAFFIC IMPACTS The City of Newport Beach identified 24 intersections for analysis to determine the impact of the proposed development. The 1990 peak 2.5 hour volumes were provided for each intersection by the city staff. Since the project is expected to be completed by 1992, the ambient growth rate of one percent per year was added to all volumes along Jamboree Road south of MacArthur and along MacArthur north of Jamboree. A factor of five percent per year was added to all volumes along MacArthur Boulevard south of Jamboree Road. Along Coast Highway, a 2.5 percent per year factor was applied west of Newport Boulevard, a one percent factor was applied between Jamboree and Newport, a two percent factor was applied between MacArthur and Jamboree, and a four percent factor was applied east of MacArthur. The peak 2.5 hour volumes of all approved projects, also provided by the city, were added to the peak 2.5 hour volumes. The resulting volumes represent the projected peak 2.5 hour volumes prior to the addition of project traffic. A list of approved projects is given in Table 2. One percent of the projected peak 2.5 hour volumes of each approach of each intersection was compared with the,peak 2.5 hour distributed volumes from the proposed project. A summary of this comparison is shown in Table 3. If one percent of the 1993 peak 2.5 hour volumes of each approach was larger than the peak 2.5 hour project volumes, no further analyses were required. If project peak 2.5 hour volumes were higher than one percent of the projected peak 2.5 hour volumes on any approach of any intersection, the intersection was analyzed using the Intersection Capacity Utilization(ICU) method. — Comparison of the one percent of the peak 2.5 hour volumes with the project peak 2.5 hour Fashion Island Entitlement Transfer 5 Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. (� 1 y6 ID 11% � » 14%aRisroL MESA 'y7 �qy BEL MAR / 1 BISON 3�9 40 °� It� 22Ne S PROJECT SITSTA E '0mq °M°ARAY 10% °'� 8 1 N � w 4% 14% 2% OPlp 3% Dq?^ 4h ^ 14% _ Figure 3 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION Fashion Island Entitlement Transfer 6 Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. �1 • • # � Y Table 2 APPROVED PROJECTS SUMMARY APPROVED PROJECTS PERCENTAGE COMPLETED Hughes Aircraft #1 100% Occupancy Far West Savings and Loan 100% Occupancy Aeronutronic Ford 100%Occupancy Back Bay Office 100% Occupancy Boyle Engineering 100%Occupancy Cal Canadian Bank 100% Occupancy Civic Plaza 89%Occupancy Corporate Plus 30%Occupancy, 'Koll Center Newport 100%Occupancy MacArthur Court 100%Occupancy Orchard Office 100% Occupancy Pacific Mutual Plaza 100% Occupancy 3701 Birch Office 100%Occupancy rt Place 86%Occupancy Bank of Newport 100%Occupancy Bayside Square IOD%Occupancy Sea Inland 100% Occupancy Baywood Apartments 100%Occupancy Harbor Point'Homes 100%Occupancy Roger's Gardens 100% Occupancy Seaview Lutheran Plaza 100% Occupancy Rudy Baron 100%Occupancy Quail Business Center 100%Occupancy 441 Newport.Blvd 100%Occupancy Martha's Vineyard IW%Occupancy Coast Business Center 100% Occupancy Rau'Mollard 100%Occupancy Hughes Aircraft 82 100%Occupancy Flagship Hospital 100% Occupancy Big Canyon 10 29%Occupancy Fun Zone 100%Occupancy Marriott Hotel 160% Occupancy St.Andrew's Church IOD%Occupancy Allred Condos 300%Occupancy Morgan Development 100% Occdpancy Four Seasons Hotel 100%Occupancy Univ.Ath Club TPP 4 EMKAY 100%Occupancy Block 400 Medical 100%Occupancy Amendment #1 MacArthur Court 52%Occupancy Amendment N2 Ford Aero 100% Occupancy Carver Granville Office 10D%Occupancy Corona Del Mar Homes 100%Occupancy Roun's➢evelopment 90%Occupancy Block 500 Npt Center Project 100%Occupancy Newport Aquatics Center 45% Occupancy 2600 E. Coast Hwy 100%Occupancy Jasmine Park IOD%Occupancy Newporter Inn Expansion 100% Occupancy Fashion Island Renaissance 100% Occupancy CDM Senior Project 100%Occupancy Point Del Mar 100%Occupancy Pacific Club 100% Occupancy Newport Seacrcst Apts. 100% Occupancy Seaside Apts.(Mesa II) IOD%Occupancy "- Victoria Station (Office) IOD% Occupancy Newport Imports 100% Occupancy Matinees,Mile Marine Center 100%Occupancy 15th St.Apra, 10D%Occupancy -- Fashion Island Entitlement Transfer 7 Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. 12 Table 2(cont.) APPROVED PROJECTS SUMMARY APPROVED PROJECTS PERCENTAGE COMPLETED Seaside Apts.III IOD% Occupancy Amendment #1 Ford Aero 100%Occupancy _ Amendment #1 North Ford 10D% Occupancy Amendment#1 North Ford 100%Occupancy Amendment #1 North Ford 100% Occupancy , Fashion Island Entitlement Transfer 8 Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. l 3r 13 Table 3 ONE-PERCENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY AM PROJECT PEAK 2.5 HOUR VOLUMES LESS TITAN 1% OF 1993 INTERSECTION NB SE ER WB PEAK Z5 HOUR VOLUMES 1. Coast Huy&Orange 0 0 2 2 Yes ^ 2. Coast Huy&Prospect 0 0 2 2 Yea 3. Coast Hwy&Balboa/Superior 0 1 2 3 Yes 4. Coast Hwy&Riverside 00 3 3 Yea 5. Coast Hwy&Tustin 0 0 3 Yes 6. Coast Hwy&DoverBayshore 0 1 3 4 Yes 7. Coast Hwy&Bayside 0 0 4 4 Yes S. Coast Hwy &Jamboree 1 3 4 2 Yes 9. Coast Hwy&MacArthur 0 2 0 3 Yes 10. Coast Hwy&Goldenrod 0 0 2 3 Yes 11. Coast Hwy&Marguerite 0 0 2 3 Yes 12. Coast Hwy&Poppy 0 0 2 3 Yes 13. MacArthur&San Miguel 3 1 2 0 Yes _ 14. MacArthur&San Joaquin Hills 1 4 5 1 Yes 15. MacArthur&Ford 4 4 0 0 Yes 16. MacArthur&Bison 4 4 0 0 Yee 17. Jamboree&Santa Barbara 3 0 0 3 Yes 18, Jamboree&San Joaquin Hills 0 3 0 1 Yes -' 19. Jamboree& Easibluff/Ford 1 2 1 0 Yes 20. Jamboree&Bison 1 2 0 0 Yes 21. Jamboree&Eastbluff/Unimrshy, 1 2 0 0 Yes 27. Jamboree&Bristol 1 2 0 0 Yes 23. Jamboree&Bristol North 1 2 0 0 Yes 24. MacArthur&Jamboree 1 2 2 2 Yes _ PM PROJECT PEAK 2.5 HOUR VOLUMES LESS THAN 1%OF 1993 INTERSECTION NB SB Be WB PEAK ZS HOUR VOLUMES 1. Coast Hwy& Orange 0 0 6 7 Yes Yee r 2. Coast Hwy&Prospect 0 0 6 7 Yes 3, Coast Hwy&Balboa/Superior 0 2 6 9 Yes 4. Coast Hwy&Riverside 0 0 8 12 Yes _ S. Coast Huy&Tustin 0 0 8 12 Yes 6. Coast Hwy&DoverBayshore 0 2 8 14 7. Coast Hwy& Bayside 0 0 10 14 Yes S. Coast Hwy&Jamboree 2 9 10 7 Yes Yes 9. Coast Hwy&MacArthur 0 8 0 S 10. Coast Hwy&Goldenrod 0 0 8 5 Yes Yes 11. Coast Hwy&Marguerite 0 0 8 5 Yes 1Z Coast Hwy&Poppy 0 0 8 5 Yee 13. MacArthur&San Miguel S 4 4 0 Yee 14. MacArthur&San Joaquin Hills 3 8 20 3 15. MacArthur&Ford 12 8 0 0 Yes 16. MacArthur&Bison 12 8 0 0 Yes 17. Jamboree&Santa Barbara 7 0 0 9 Yes 18. Jamboree&San Joaquin Hills 0 8 0 9 Yes 19, Jamboree&Esslbluf/Ford 9 6 2 0 Yes 20. Jamboree&Bison 7 6 0 0 Yes 21. Jamboree&FAstblufWniversity 7 6 0 0 Yee ._ 22. Jamboree&Bristol 7 4 2 0 Yes Fashion Island Entitlement Transfer 9 Auatin-Foust Associates,Ana i"I lylJ volumes resulted in all intersections passing the one percent analysis. Further analysis is not required. CONCLUSIONS The proposed retail development which is in reality a transfer of entitlement previously approved at Bison and Camelback will generate 32 trips during the AM peak 2.5 hour period and 94 trips during the PM peak 2.5 hour period. Twenty-four intersections were checked to determine the marginal impact of project traffic on the street system. All of the intersections pass the one- percent analysis. Therefore, the proposed project has no significant impact on the arterial network. Fashion Island Entitlement Transfer 10 Austin-Foust Associates, Inc 133 . 15 APPENDIX 1� I� Ilal(1c: Vol nniv Ann I Ysw Intersection: Coast Hwy @ Orange St Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected t% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakVolume Hour Peak Volume Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume — Northbound 228 O 0 228 2 0 Southbound 218 0 0 218 2 0 Eastbound 4471 268 SB7 5326 53 2 Westbound 2534 152 265 2951 30 2 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected - Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. _ I 13� PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND PULL ----OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 1% traffic Volume Analysis 'Intersection: Coast Hwy 8 Orange St Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PH Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1X of Protected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 204 0 0 204 2 0 Southbound 124 0 0 124 1 0 Eastbound 3339 200 440 3879 40 G Westbound 4782 287 689 5728 57 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. — Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 r_ ----- -------- - --- - - - ---- --- -- -------------- ----- --- ------- ------ - 3 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection, Coast Hwy @ Prospect St . Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM - Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Protected 1% of, Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakVolume Hour PeakVolume Hour PeakVolume Hour Volume Volume Volume — Northbound 163 0 0 153 2 0 Southbound 422 0 O 422 4 0 i j 267 587 5306 53 2 - i Eastbound 4452 Westbound 2586 155 265 3006 30 2 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 l #x •hA 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy @ Prospect St Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project _ Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume '— Northbound 160 0 0 160 2 0 Southbound 262 0 2 264 3 0 Eastbound 3323 199 446 3968 40 6 Westbound 5131 308 665 6104 51 7 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than VA of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required, PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- �yg 1% Traffic Volume Analysts Intersection: Coast Hwy @ Balboa BI-Superior Av g0 AM Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Protected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakVolume Hour PeakVolume Hour Peak Volume Hour Volume Volume Volume — Northbound 1717 0 7 1724 17 0 — Scuthbound 1231 0 24 1255 13 1 Eastbound 5111 307 585 6003 60 2 Westbound 1195 108 239 2142 21 3 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ' Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJE CT: FAS HION ISLAND FULL-OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 7j Y • »F T 14 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy 0 Balboa B1-Superior Av Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PH Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1788 0 B 1796 18 0 Southbound 2811 0 110 2921 29 2 Eastbound 3638 218 438 4294 43 6 Westbound 3448 207 561 4216 42 9 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 ------------------------------------------------------- - - --------------------- q D y2 1% Traffic Vol time Andl ys is Intersect unr: Ludst Hwy 1tl Riverside Av Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakVolume Hour PeakVolume Hour PeakVolume Hour Volume Volume Northbound 12 0 3 15 0 0 Southbound 824 0 59 883 9 0 Eastbound 4951 119 624 5694 57 3 Westbound 2956 71 447 3474 35 3 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- - --- - l3 • �Y L 10 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy 0 Riverside Av Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PH Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project ion Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Direct Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volu me — Northbound 66 0 8 74 1 0 — Southbound 1287 0 32 1319 13 0 Eastbound 4532 109 640 5281 53 8 — Westbound 4872 117 747 5736 57 12 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of 'Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. — PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 --------------------------------------^------------------------- -- i l 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection; Coast Hwy @ Tustin Av Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Protected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakVolume Hour PeakVolume Hour PeakVolume Hour -' Volume Volume Volume , 0 10 0 0 --• Northbound 10 O Southbound 123 0 13 136 1 0 5071 51 3 Eastbound 4335 304 632 _ Westbound 3262 18 446 3786 38 3 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. — PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 - --- - -- - - l 3 y5 0 t 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy @ Tustin Av Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 901PM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2'Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 23 0 0 23 0 0 Southbound 270 0 4 274 3 0 Eastbound 4252 102 641 4995 50 8 Westbound 4944 119 724 5787 58 12 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. --' PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 ----- -'--- ---------" "--'--- ------ yb 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy @ Dover Dr-Bayshore Or Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected l% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakV2 1/2ume Hour PeakV2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume — ume Northbound 337 0 8 345 3 0 Southbound 2508 @ 49 2557 26 1 Eastbound 4156 300 585 4841 48 3 Westbound 4646 112 451 5209 52 4 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 ---------------------------------------------------------------'----------------------------- . y1 • � L'6 ,Y l 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy @ Dover Dr-Bayshore Or Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PH Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project _ Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour 'Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 297 0 20 317 3 0 Southbound 2894 0 55 2949 29 2 Eastbound 4100 98 569 4767 48 8 Westbound 6780 163 670 7613 76 14 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Prdjected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. -- Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. '— PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 ------------'------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Q 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy @ Bayside Or Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Projected 1% of Projected ProjectApproach Existing Regional Projects Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakV2 1/2ume Hour Peak Volume Hour PeakV2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume ume 10 1306 13 0 Northbound 1296 0 • Southbound 145 0 159 304 3 0 Eastbound 6635 159 651 7445 74 4 . Westbound 3397 82 415 3894 39 4 - Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. •• Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ' Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHIO N ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 I 7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- - X-1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy @ Bayside Or Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1L of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak Yolu/me•Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1496 0 4 1500 15 0 Southbound 180 0 267 447 4 0 Eastbound 6412 154 663 7229 72 10 Westbound 6989 168 691 7848 78 14 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (1,C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 - - -- - �q!i -----------------------------------------------___-------------------__-------------------- t 30 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy @ Jamboree Rd Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Protect Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1514 0 34 1548 15 1 ,— Southbound 2242 0 538 2780 28 3 Eastbound 5690 137 623 6450 64 4 Westbound 2762 133 242 3137 31 2 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection'Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 __-^---------------- . _ 31 4 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy 0 Jamboree Rd Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Wintgr/Spring 90 PH Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected LX of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1'/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak Volu/me Hour Peak Volu/me Hour Volume Volume Volume volume ` Northbound 1009 0 48 1057 11 2 Southbound 4522 0 696 5218 52 9 Eastbound 4918 118 713 5749 57 10 Westbound 4526 217 322 . 5065 51 7 =_> Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 ----------------------- 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection" Coast Hwy @ MacArthur Bl Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project _ Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakV2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume -- ume Northbound 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southbound 1569 0 195 1764 18 2 Eastbound 2625 126 139 2890 29 0 Westbound 5855 562 644 7061 71 3 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. , —' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- �3 0 'r 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy @ MacArthur Bl rxisting Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PH ,Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects 'Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 i/2' Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southbcund 2983 0 437 3420 34 8 Eastbound 3750 180 284 4214 42 0 Westbound 2678 257 349 3284 33 5 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than �1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993- 3`f 0 l% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy @ Goldenrod Av g0 AM Fxisting Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring , . Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project _ Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakVolume Hour Peak Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 368 0 0 368 4 0 — Southbound 178 0 g 178 2 0 2953 30 2 Eastbound 2479 238 236 '• 6962 70 3 Westbound 5734 550 678 • Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. •• '— Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity. Utilization , (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. _ PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 3 1% Traftic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy @ Goldenrod AY Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Wigter/Spring 90 PH Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected l% of Projected Project _ Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 342 0 0 342 3 0 Southbound 300 0 0 300 3 0 Eastbound 5516 530 686 6732 67 8 Westbound 3684 354 347 4385 44 5 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION-ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 36 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy @ Marguerite Av Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project _ _ Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume I Northbound 554 0 0 554 6 0 ._ Southbound 486 0 0 486 5 0 Eastbound 2409 231 236 2876 29 2 Westbound 5194 499 678 6371 64 3 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. '— Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 15�, 37 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy @ Marguerite AV Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1X of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakY2 1/2ume Hour PeakU2 1/2ume Hour 'PeakV2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume ume Northbound 701 0 0 701 7 0 .— Southbound 965 0 0 965 • 10 0 Eastbound 5083 488 686 6257 63 8 Westbound 3333 320 347 4000 40 5 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 h1'J r l% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy @ Poppy Av Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected . 1% of Projected Project _ Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 74 0 0 74 1 0 Southbound 135 0 0 135 1 0 Eastbound 1950 187 239 2376 24 2 ." Westbound 5847 561 682 7090 71 3 Project Traffic is esi:imated'to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy @ Poppy Ay Existing Traffic'Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PH Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project ,Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 'I/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 215 0 0 215 2 0 Southbound 494 0 0 494 5 0 Eastbound 4523 434 744 5701 57 8 Westbound 2967 285 397 3649 36 5 _=> Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 'A/ ------' - '---------------------------------- - 90 Li D 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: MacArthur B1 @ San Miguel Or Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 I/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project _ Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak Volume Hour PeakV2 112 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume — ume Northbound 4631 556 217 5404 54 3 — Southbound 2527 303 206 3036 30 1 Eastbound 412 0 20 432 4 2 Westbound 667 0 24 691 7 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 I/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 I5 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection:' MacArthur B1, @ San Miguel Or Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved li Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 2418 290 150 2 858 29 5 Southbound 3908 469 279 4656 47 4 Eastbound 2111 0 118 2229 22 4 Westbound 662 0 14 676 7 0 _> Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. — Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 160 ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- rya i 1% Traffic Volume Analysts Intersection: MacArthur 01 @ San Joaquin Hills Rd Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak Volu/me Hour PeakU2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume volume ume Northbound 4043 485 354 4882 49 1 Southbound 4055 487 321 4863 49 4 Eastbound 531 @ 18 549 5 5 Westbound 2202 0 106 2308 23 1 � , Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. ' PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: MacArthur 61 @ San Joaquin Hills ,Rd Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected. Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 3265 392 207 3864 39 3 _ Sauthbound 5442 653 500 6595 66 8 Eastbound 2054 0 115 2169 22 20 — Westbound 960 0 22 982 10 3 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume-. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required, — PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 ---- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ��� 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: MacArthur 81 @ Ford Rd Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project _ Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak Uolu/me Hour Peak Volume Hour Peak V21/22 Hour Volume Volume Volume — Northbound 5381 646 566 6593 66 4 _ Southbound 4700 564 348 5612 56 4 Eastbound 312 @ 0 312 3 0 Westbound 1972 0 151 2123 21 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected , Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U,) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ,/ 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: MacArthur Bl @ Ford Rd Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1X of Projected Project _ Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak V22 1/2 Hour PeakV2 1/2ume Hour PeakVolume Hour Volume Volume Volume — Northbound 4708 565 361 5634 56 12 8 _ Southhound 6737 '808, 683 8228 82 I Eastbound 594 0 32 626 6 0 Westbound 1207 0 30 1237 12 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. I Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (L.C.U,) Analysis is required. —' PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 lb q �{6 i 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: MacArthur 81 @ Bison Av Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected • 1% of Projected Project _ Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour 'III Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume — Northbound 6683 80Z 402 7887 79 4 1 Southbound 4844 581 406 5831 58 4 Eastbound 490 0 66 558 6 0 22 0 0 Westbound 0 0 22 - Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/Z Hour Traffic Volume. , Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 /6 7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- , Hj 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: MacArthur 81 0 Bison Av Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PH Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2,Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 112 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 5409 649 297 6355 64 12 Southbound 7047 846 423 8316 83 8 Eastbound 938 0 165 1103 11 0 Westbound 0 0 0 0 0 0 _=> Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is, required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 f b 6 ----------------------------------------------------- 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Jamboree Rd @ Santa Barbara Or 90 AM Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Protect Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakV2 1/2 Hour — Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume — ume Northbound 3758 90 893 4741 47 3 — Southbound 3202 77 655 3934 39 0 Eastbound 0 0 0 O O O Westbound 540 O 41 581 6 3 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 ------------------------------- / y9 s 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Jamboree Rd'@ Santa Barbara Dr Ixisting Traffic Volumes Based on 'Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PH Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 2942 71 621 3634 36 7 Southbound 4129 99 1020 5248 52 0 0 0 0 Eastbound 0 0 0 Westbound 2166 0 188 2356 24 9 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 fhb --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- sQ 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Jamboree Rd @ San Joaquin Hills Rd Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakVolume Hour PeakVolume Hour PeakVolume Hour Volume Volume Volume — Northbound 3400 82 952 4434 44 0 — Southbound 4268 102 688 5058 51 3 0 2 696 7 0 Eastbound 694 Westbound 1179 0 103 1282 13 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. `- Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ y! 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Jamboree Rd 0 Sau .loaquin Ili IIs Rd Existing Traffic Volumes Rased on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PH -u Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected l% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakV2 1/2ume Hour PeakV22 1//2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 3295 79 734 4108 41 0 Southbound 5124 123 1145 6392 64 0 Eastbound 419 0 2 421 4 0 Westbound 2183 0 100 2283 23 9 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. -- Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 �D ------ ----- I hl- 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Jamboree Rd @ Eastbluff Dr-Ford Rd Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of• Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakV2 1/2ume Hour PeakU2 1/2ume Hour PeakV2 1/2 Hour volume Volume Volume — ume Northbound 3904 94 844 4842 48 1 Southbound 3361 81 642 4084 41 2 Eastbound 1081 0 26 1107 11 1 Westbound 998 0 3 1001 10 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. /7/ PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL' OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 --___ 53 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Jamboree Rd @ Eastbluff Dr-Ford,Rd I xisting Traffic Volumes Based an Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project _ Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakVolume Hour PeakVolume Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 4812 115 722 5649 55 9 — Southbcund 4040 97 1092 5229 52 8 Eastbound 1194 @ q 1198 12 2 Westbound 500 0 17 517 5 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/,2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHI ON ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 I�y 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Jamboree Rd @ Bison Av Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakV2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ume Northbound 3746 90 874 4710 47 1 49 2 — Southbound 3972 95 785 4852 ' Eastbound 334 0 22 356 4 0 554 6 0 Westbound 505 0 qg , Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 65 0 IX Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Jamboree Rd 0 Bison Av g0 PM Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected IX of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1'(2 flour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2'Hour PeakV2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume — ume Northbound 4619 111 735 5465 55 7 Southbound 4346 104 1026 5476 55 6 Eastbound 217 O 45 262 3 0 Westbound 568 O 109 677 7 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1X of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume, Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 ---------------------------------------------------------------"------------- ---------------- )1 - yb 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Jamboree Rd @ Eastbluff Dr-University Or Existing Traffic Volumes eased on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AN Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour -- Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 4181 300 885 5166 52 1 _ Southbound 3753 90 914 4757 48 2 Eastbound 1136 0 160 1296 13 0 Westbound 1353 0 2 1355 14 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected' Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- tJ- 7 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Jamboree Rd 8 Eastbluff Or-University Or Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PH Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 4782 115 865 5762 58 7 Southbound 5311 127 1213 6651 67 6 Eastbound 825 0 33 858 9 0 Westbound 1016 0 63 1079 11 0 =e> Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 FULL PROJECT: FASHION (-LAND 1 b 5g 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Jamboree Rd @ Bristol St Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1� of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakV2 1/2ume Hour PeakV2 1/2ume Hour PeakU2 1/2 Hour ume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 5389 129 891 6409 64 1 Southbound 864 21 813 1698 17 2 Eastbound 6337 0 1277 7614 76 0 Westbound 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Protected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -'- ---'------- 69 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Jamboree Rd @ Bristol St Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 5427 130 1027 6584 66 7 Southbound 2117 51 764 2932 29 4 Eastbound 5977 0 1181 7158 72 2 Westbound 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 I�d -- ------------ --- - --' -- -c------ - ' --- -------------- -- - 0 60' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Jamboree Rd @ Bristol St N Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Pro0ected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakY2 1/2ume Hour PeakY2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume ume Northbound 7971 191 941 9103 91 1 Southbound 1545 37 888 2470 25 2 O O 0 Eastbound 9 0 0 . 0 0 0 Westbound 9 0 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Jamboree Rd 0 Bristol St N Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PH Peak 2 112 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 6961 167 1050 8178 82 7 Southbound 3780 91 1014 4885 49 4 Eastbound 0 0 0 0 0 0 Westbound 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. -' PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 I U --- U 6v 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: MacArthur B1 @ Jamboree Rd Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project _ Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakV2 1/2ume Hour PeakV22 1//2 Hour Peak Volume Hour Volume Volume Volume Northbound 2795 335 479 3609 36 1 2794 28 2 — Southbound 1834 44 916 I, Eastbound 919 0 1125 2044 20 2 Westbound 2575 62 749 3386 34 2 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 p --------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- �0 ' 63 1% Traffic Volume Analysis , Intersection: MacArthur Bl @ Jamboree Rd Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average. Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 90 PM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected l% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour PeakY2 1/2ume Hour PeakVolume Hour volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1496 180 498 2174 22 5 Southbound 2693 65 723 3481 35 4 Eastbound 1752 0 907 2659 27 4 Westbound 3138 75 989 4202 42 6 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FASHION ISLAND FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 1993 I�r ------------ O��gW Po ' ,: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH U Z P.O. BOX 1768,NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92658.8915 c'9C/FO piN�P NEGATIVE, DECLARATION ------------- TO: Office of Planning and Research FROM: Planning Department Q1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 City of Newport Beach Sacramento, CA 95814 P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 ❑ County Clerk of the County of Orange P.O. Box 838 Santa Ana, CA 92702 NAME OF PROJECT:GPA 90-1 G Amendments No. 701 and 721, TPO No. 70 and Finding of Gnexal Plan consistency PROJECT LOCATION: 1177 Camelback & 101 Newport Center Drive, Newport Be h PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Amendment of Planned Community Regulations to permit office, rather than retail use on Pac Tel site, on Camelback. Transfer of 13,550 feet of retail develo ment from Pac Tel to Newport Center. FINDING: Pursuant to the provisions of City Council Policy K-3 pertaining to procedures and guidelines to implement the California Environmental Quality Act, the Environmental Affairs Committee has evaluated the proposed project and determined that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. MITIGATION MEASURES: ATTACHED INITIAL STUDY PREPARED BY: Sandra L. Genis Principal Planner INITIAL STUDY AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT: 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA DATE RECEIVED FOR FILING: oe Environmental Coordinator DATE: 3300 Newport Boulevard,,Newport Beach 6d l +` MITIGATION MEASURES 1. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit approved by the Building-and Planning Departments. 2. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, and a watering program designed to minimize the impacts of haul operations. 3. An-erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit. A copy of the plan shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 4. Grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer incorporating the recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans shall be furnished to the Building Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. If found necessary by the City of Newport Beach, the project applicant will be required to enter into an agreement and post a bond guaranteeing the repair of the public street system,utilities or other public property that might be damaged during excavation and construction of retaining structures and foundations. 6. Construction activities will be conducted in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code, which limits the hours of construction and excavation work to 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p:m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays. Hand-excavation activities which involve the use of stone drills,jack hammers,or other similar tools which produce grinding,pounding or other similar loud and pulsating sounds shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 7. A dust control program in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 shall be implemented during excavation and construction. This program shall include.such measures as: containing soil on-site until it is hauled away,periodic watering of stockpile soil,and regular vacuum sweeping of streets used for the haul operation to remove accumulated material. 8. The lighting system for the proposed developments shall be designed"in a manner so as to conceal the light source and minimize light and glare to the nearby residential properties on the northeasterly side of Camelback Street and the southerly side of Bison Avenue. 9. Medical office uses on the Pac Tel site shall not be certified for occupancy until such time as an additional northbound through lane on MacArthur at Bison is provided. I��bh . t ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Date Filed January 4 1990 General Information 1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor: City of Newport Beach, 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport each, Ca for GPA 90-1 G and Finding of General Plan consistency The Irvine Company, 550 Newport Center Drive NMort Beach Ca. for PC amendments and TPO. 2. Address of project: 1177 Camelback and 101 Newport Center Drive, Fashion Island Assessor's Block and Lot Number: 442-041-30 and 442-021-16 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Sandra L. Genis City of Newport Beach (714) 644-3225 4. Indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this form pertains: GPA 90 1 (G) Amendments No 701 and 721• TPO No 70• Finding of General Plan consistency. 5. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: NA 6. Existing zoning district: Planned Community, retail uses 7. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Office and retail Project Description 8. Site size: 2.76 acres and 19,560 if. 9. Square Footage: Amendments provide for construction of 20,000 s.f. office building at Pac Tel site on Camelback St., and construction of 20,000 square feet of retail space in Fashion Island, which will include a transfer of 13,550 s.f. transferred onto Fashion Island. 10. Number of floors of construction: Not specified. Will meet PC standards,maximum 32 feet at Pac Tel, and 40 feet for peripheral buildings at Fashion Island. 11. Amount of off-street parking provided: To be provided to existing PC standards. - 1 - ,�s bl • 0 1 f '. 12. Attach plans. NA 13. Proposed scheduling. NA 14. Associated project. 15. Anticipated incremental development. 16. If residential,include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. Commercial at Fashion Island will be regional in nature. 18. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 19. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. A Planned Community District Amendment is required to provide for office uses on the Pac Tel site and to provide for increased retail space and Fashion Island. applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items Are the following items app P J checked yes (attach additional sheets if necessary) Yes No 21. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, — X or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. 22. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residen- tial areas or public lands or roads. 23. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area — X of project. 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. — X 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in — X vicinity. - 2 - b '�6f� 1. Yes No 26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water — x quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration — x levels in the vicinity. 28. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. x — (Small portion of periphery of Pac Tel site) 29. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, — x such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. 30. Substantial change in demand for municipal services — x (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption — x (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.) 32. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. — x Environmental Setting 33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on viro topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. Both sites are largely paved, with no on site structures. Both sites are largely flat, although the Pac Tel site is somewhat below the grade of Bison Avenue and sloped at the periphery of the site. 34. Describe the surrounding properties,including information on plants and animals and any cultural historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. - 3 - Ig� 69 v x Surrounding land uses for both sites are largely commercial, with single family attached residential uses south of the Pac Tel site, across Bison Avenue and multi- family residential northeast of the Pac Tel site, across Camelback Street. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signature For �`eu/f'" JM\EIR-DOCS\EIR-INPA - 4 - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. Background 1. Name of Project Proponents: City of Newport Beach for GPA 90-1 G and Finding of General Plan consistengy The Irvine Company for PC amendments and TPO. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent Cif of Newport Beach. 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach Ca 114) 644-3225)- The Irvine �mpany 550 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach Ca (714) 720-2335._ 3. Date Checklist Submitted JanuM 3 1991 4. Agency Requiring Checklist city of Newaort Beach 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable GPA 90 1 (G,) Amendments No. 701 and 721 TPO No 70• Finding of General Plan consistency. II. Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) Yes Maybg No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? — — x b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? — X C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? — x — d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? — — x - 1 - 71 0 0 Yes. Maybe No e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? — -x — f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or X any bay, inlet or, lake? — — — g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? — — x 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. substantial air emissions or deterioration X of ambient air quality? — — — b. The creation of objectionable odors? — — -'s— C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, X either locally or regionally? — — 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either X marine or fresh waters? — — b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? — — x C. Alterations to the course or flow of X flood waters? — d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? — X X . 2 _ �t�0 I Yes Ma No e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X — f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground water? — — X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? — — X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? — — X i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? — — X 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or num- ber of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? — — X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? — X C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? — — X 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or num- bers of any species of animals (buds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthic organisms or insects)? -- — x - 3 - • �3 Yes Mayhe No b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? — — X C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migra- tion or movement of animals? — — X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife x habitat? — — — 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? — X — b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? — — X 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? — X — 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a sub- stantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? x - - 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? — — x 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? — — X b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? -- — X 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? — — X - 4 - iyy Yes Maybe No 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? — — X 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X — — b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X — — C. Substantial impact upon existing trans- portation systems? — x — d. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? — — X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? — X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? — — x 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered gov- ernmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? — — X b, Police protection? — — x C. Schools? — — x d. Parks or other recreational facilities? — -- x e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? — — X f. Other governmental services? — — X - 5 - Ik3 • •�5 Yes V�� MU be No 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? — — x b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy, or require the development x of new sources of energy? — — 16. Utilites. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? — — x b. Communications systems? — — X C. Water? — — x d. Sewer or septic tanks? — — X e. Storm water drainage? — — x f, Solid waste and disposal? — — x 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in? a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? — — x b. Exposure of people to potential health x hazards? — 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open X to public view? — 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? — — x - 6 - t i41 7b f . Yes Ma N 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or x historic archaeological site? — — — b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or x historic building, structure, or object? — — — C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect x unique ethnic cultural values? — — — d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses with the potential impact x area? — —' — 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of x California history or prehistory? — — — b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a rela- tively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) — — x - 7 - �yh. Yes M he No C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively con- siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on x the environment is significant.) -- — d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? — X III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation (Narrative description of.environmental impacts.) 1b Development of the project sites will involve disruption of existing ground surfaces. However, because the two sites have previously been graded and are currently paved over, this is not considered a significant impact. is Eventual development of the project sites could result in alteration of the existing, largely flat ground surface. However,under existing City regulations, any significant alteration would be subject to the approval of a grading permit by the City of Newport Beach, which would incorporate appropriate conditions to reduce any potential impacts to an insignificant level. le, 3e The potential exists for erosion and associated surface water turbidity during construction. Any potential impacts will be reduced to a level of insignificance by the attached mitigation measures. 6a Short term impacts due to construction noise could occur in, the surrounding area. The distance to the nearest residential development lessen the significance of this impact. However, construction hours will be limited those specified in the attached mitigation measures, thereby reducing this impact to a level of insignificance. 7 Light and glare could result from parking lot lighting and other outdoor lighting. This has the potential for significance only insofar as residential areas near the Pac Tel,site could be affected. However,the attached mitigation measure will reduce this potential impact to a level of insignificance. 8 Future land use of the Pac Tel site will be altered from Retail and Service Commercial to Administrative,Professional and Financial Commercial. This change is not considered significant. - 8 - I�l�' -76 0 13a,c 20,000 square feet of general office use on the Pac Tel site would generate 50 am peak hour trips and 45 pm peak hour trips,which would not have significant adverse impacts on any intersection. The same amount of medical office uses on the same would generate 15 am peak hour trips and 90 pm peak hour trips, which has the potential to result in adverse impacts on the intersection of MacArthur and Bison. This impact can be reduced to an insignificant level by the intersection improvement listed iwthe attached mitigation measures. The proposed increase in square footage at Fashion Island would generate 16 am peak hour trips and 47 pm peak hour trips,which would not have an adverse impact on the arterial network. 13b Development of the project sites will result in increased demand for parking. However, adherence to existing City parking standards for the sites will result in no significant impact on surrounding areas. 21d Development of the project sites could effect people in the area to the extent the above impacts were not mitigated. However, the imposition of the attached list of mitigation measures will reduce any potential impacts to a level of insignificance. IV. Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION — WILL BE PREPARED. — I find that although the proposed project could have a signif- icant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. x A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. — I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT — is required. _ 0G1-- to Si afore '7 0 ` eef�f E1R-DOCS\pcU For chkl • - 9 - s MITIGATION MEASURES 1. Development of the site 'shall be -subject to a grading permit approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 2. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, and a watering program designed to minimize the impacts of haul operations. 3. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department prior to the issuance of the grading;permit. A copy of the plan shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 4. Grading shall be conducted in accordance wiff plans prepared by a civil engineer incorporating the recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans shall be furnished to .the Building Department prior; to the issuance of building permits. 5. If found necessary by the City of Newport Beach, the project applicant will be required to enter into an agreement and post a bond guaranteeing the repair of the public street system,utilities or other public property that might be damaged during excavation and construction of retaining structures and foundations. 6. Construction activities will be conducted in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code, which limits the hours of construction and excavation Work to 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m..to 6:00 pm. on Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays; Land ezcavationactivities which involve the Use . of stone drills,jack hammers,or other similar.tools which produce grinding,pounding or other similar,loud and pulsating sounds shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 7. A dust control program in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 shall be implemented during excavation and construction. This program shall include such measures as: containing soil on-site until it is hauled away,periodic watering of stockpile soil,and regular vacuum sweeping of streets used for the haul operation to remove accumulated'material. 8. The lighting system for the proposed developments shall be designed in a manner so as to conceal the light source and minimize light and glare to the nearby residential properties on the northeasterly side of Camelback Street and the southerly side of Bison Avenue. 9. Medical office uses on the PacTel site shall not be certified for occupancy until such time as an additional northbound through lane on MacArthur at Bison is provided. 'r MITIGATION MEASURES 1. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 2. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes, access points to, the site, and a watering program designed to minimize the impacts of haul operations. 3. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit. A copy of the plan shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 4. Grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer incorporating the recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of the site. 'Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved'as Built" grading 'plans shall be furnished to the Building Department prior to the issuance of building permits. S. If found necessary by the City of Newport Beach, the project applicant will be required to enter into an agreement and post a bond guaranteeing the repair of the public street system,utilities or other public property that might be damaged during excavation and construction of retaining structures and foundations. 6. Construction activities will be conducted in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code, which limits the hours of construction and excavation work to 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 am. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays. Hand excavation activities which involve the use of stone drills,jack hammers,or other similar tools which produce grinding,pounding or other similar loud and pulsating sounds shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 7. A dust control program in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 shall be implemented during excavation and construction. This program shall include such measures as: containing soil and until it is hauled away,periodic watering of stockpile soil,and.regular vacuum sweeping of streets used for the haul operation to remove accumulated material: 8. The lighting system for the proposed developments shall,be designed in a manner so as to conceal the light source and minimize light and glare to the nearby residential properties on the northeasterly side of Camelback Street and the southerly side of Bison Avenue. 9. Medical office uses on the Pac Tel site shall not be certified for occupancy until such time as an additional northbound through lane on'MacArthui• at Bison is provided. _MITIGATION MEASURES 1. Development of the site shall be ,subject to a grading permit approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 2. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, and a watering program designed to,minimize the impacts of haul operations. 3. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to the ading pet. A copy of the plan shallDepartment be forwarded to tthe California Regidnal Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 4. Grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer incorporating the recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans shall be furnished to the Building Department prior to the issuance of building permits. applicant will be 5. If found necessary by the City of Newport Beach, the project pp p j required to enter into an agreement and post a bond guaranteeing the repair of the public street system,utilities or other public property that might be damaged during excavation'and construction of retaining structures and foundations. 6. Construction activities will be conducted in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code, which limits the hours of construction and excavation work to 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 prm. on Sundays and holidays. Hand excavation activities which involve the use of stone-drills,jack hammers,or other similar tools which produce grinding,,pounding or other similar loud and pulsating sounds shall be limited to the hours bf 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 1. A dust control program in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Riffle•403 shall be implemented during excavation and construction. This program shall include such measures as: containing soil•on-site until it is hauled• away,periodic watering of stockpile soil;and regular vacuum sweeping of streets used for the haul operation to remove accumulated material. 8. The lighting system for the proposed.developments shallbe designed in a manner so as to conceal the light.soitrce,and minimize light and,glare to the nearby residential properties on the northeasterly side of Camelback Street and the southerly side of Bison Avenue. 9. Medical office uses on the Pac Tel site shall not be certified for occupancy until such time as an'ad'ditional northbound through lane on.MacArthur at Bison is provided. a �$Z 02-219— 01 TRAFFIC STUDIES6J /APPLICANT: CONSULTANTS: '^ NAME: ' GIJ�,/1r9/X� .�,✓l./, ic i r/i(�/LC.II ,� O PHONE: PROJECT NAME: DESCRIPTION: DATE DEPOSIT FEES PAYMENT REMAINING BALANCE �Z3•�� 4� 02�� OlJ �OTe 2 DOl, Ol z� pda, bl I- - / /6 S, JD ��3�✓, OD j ���D�EwPDRr CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RECEIPT 1 O NEWPORTBEACNRCA, O ATSLIIFFORNIA 92663 No. 52121 i ��y�.,--��--(�••' 4Mj RECEIVED FROM 1_S LL TS1-e � �`�OO , CO 1 FOR! ACCOUNT NOAMOUNT M a .�tppp DEPARTMENT .p. .,..,..a.+ .w.s. ...... ...--...........:..-------..�.�. .�..�..�...�..�..�..�..�..�. • • L w. DEMAND FOR CITY CF o��EarPO PAYMENT NEWPORT BEACH � c9 ,@z 4/FORS Demand Of: Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. Date: December 13, 1990 AddreSS• 2020 North Tustin Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92701 In the amount of: $127.43 Item of Expenditure Budget # Amount FASHION ISLAND TPO• Inv. - - For ofessio a se - Total Approved For Payment: Department I4e6d Audited and Approved: Finance Director REt:EiVED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ®A®RUST/N-FOUST ASSOC/AYES, /NC. DEC 121990 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND rRANSPORTATIoN PLANNING AxM�Q�p,�p �g1 PM 2020 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 TELETt% gJH1VJ11V@4I516 FAX (714) 667-7952 December 4, 1990 City of Newport Beach P. O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, Calif. 92659-1768 eanniDirector Pat Temple c z• 2- Attention., a� INVOICE Invoice No: 4848 Subject: Fashion Island TPO AFA Project No: Oi7.032 Period.• November 1 -30, 1990 CLASSIFICATION HOURS RATE AMOUNT Sr. Technical 1.00 $35.00 $35.00 Design Drafter 0.50 $30.00 $15.00 Tech/Clerical 0.50 $25.00 $12.50 SUBTOTAL 2.00 $62.50 DIRECT COSTS Travel and Communication $24.50 Printing and Reproduction $11.63 Report Production-(320 copies @$.09) $28.80 SUBTOTAL $64.93 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $127.43 STATEMENT SUMMARYAS OF.NOVEMBER 30, 1990 Previously Invoiced $1,165.00 This Invoice $127.43 Total Invoiced to Date $1,292,43. Amount Paid $0.00 Amount Outstanding $1,292.43 - I DEMAND FOR C1TY a:: o�`���'Poa e NEWPORT PAYMENT BEACH "9Opo RN�P Demandof: Austin-Foust Assoc. Date: November 15, 1990 I Address: 2020 North Tustin Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92701 In the amount of: $1,165.00 Item of Expenditure Budget # Amount Fashion Island Traffic Analysis; Inv. 4737 02-219-01 $1,165.00 Professional Service Rendered: October 1-31, 1990 Total $1,165.00 Approved For Payment: _ Department He9dA Audited and Approved Finance Director 70</- DO m200. 7S oZ� 00D. �gW PORT I', e CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH . U T P.O.BOX 1768,NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92659-1768 Cg11FO VRk PLANNING DEPARTMENT (714) 644-3225 March 23, 1990 David Neish Urban Assist 3151 Airway Ave., Bldg. A-2 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Subject: Fashion Island Retail Development Traffic Study Dear Mr. Neish: The City of Newport Beach has received a proposal to provide a Traffic Study from the consultant firm of Austin-Foust Associates, Inc., for a proposed retail development on the southwest comer of Newport Center Drive and Santa Rosa Drive. The fee requested for the traffic study has been reviewed by the City and the amount • submitted for the tasks required is considered appropriate and warranted. To proceed with the study, please deposit the requested fees into your City account: Traffic Study $2,000.00 City Fee (10%) 200.00 Total: $2,200.00 Please make your check payable to the City of Newport Beach. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Very truly yours, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director By -&"a� , Patricia Temple Principal Planner JM\EIR-DOCS\FASH-ISL.323 . Enclosure 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach Y i� r Vendor; 58Y505 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Check Date: Retention Check: 231 Ifivoi&J) Invoice Date Reference Mount Retention Discount Ne2,20Ou00 CR040690 4- 6-90 2,200.00 8201 154100 158000 2,200.00 ____ ----------- ----------- } Totals 2,200.00 0.00 0.00 2,200.00 h 4FA®AIISTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. ' TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND TRA N.SPOR TA TION PLANNING 2020 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 • TELEPHONE (714) 667-0496 FAX (714) 667-7952 November2, 1990 APPROVEID FOR PAYMENT BgPiang City of Newport Beach P. O. Box 1768 Director Newport Beach, Calif. 92659-1768 Attention: Pat Temple INVOICE Invoice No: 4737 Subject: Fashion Island TPO AFA Project No: 017.032 Period- October f -31, 1990 CLASSIFICATION HO RS R47-E OUNNT Transportation Engineer f7.0o $50.00 $650.00 TransportaWnAnalyst 5.50 $35.00 $192.50 Sr. Technical 3.50 $35.00 $122.50 SUBTOTAL 26.00 $1,165.00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $1,165.00 A FI In>�Ire !? E>t1� Thi8lrtvoic�2 $fr9G '... TAt8fhlvvicedto D� $1,1E'i0; 4rnx)tnt7l Paid $# 0d 4maunt Urtstalct+;n ' ! $1,1fiS.'f70 ®r®AUSTIN-FOIIST ASSOCIATES, /NC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ANO TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 2020 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 TELEPHONE (714) 667-0496 FAX (714) 667-7952 February 22, 1990 City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 ATi ENTION: Ms. Patricia Temple, Planning Department SUBJECT: PROPOSAL - FASHION ISLAND ENTITLEMENT TRANSFER TRAFFIC STUDY Dear Patty: Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA) is pleased to respond to your RFP to conduct a TPO study of a proposed 19,560 square foot retail development on the southwest corner of Newport Center Drive and Santa Rosa Drive. In addition, we propose to do a related, but separate traffic study and parking analysis of the impact of this project on the city's General Plan. •. We estimate the cost of the TPO analysis to be between $1,500 and $2,500 depending upon the number of intersections identified for analysis by the City Traffic Engineer, and whether or not they pass the initial one percent test. Based on our past experience, we expect the actual cost will be near the middle ground of these figures. We estimate a cost not to exceed $3,500 for the General Plan impact traffic study. This estimate is based on utilizing the Newport Beach traffic model for distribution and assignment of revised travel patterns created by the shifting of entitlement. This fee also includes an assessment of existing parking conditions and the net effect of the project on the available supply. We acknowledge that this fee includes a 20 percent contingency factor to allow for flexibility in the scope of work once we are underway on the study. We do not necessarily expect to exhaust the entire budget (frankly, we rarely do), but believe it is prudent to indicate that some flexibility is essential in this type of study. Since we are proposing a time and materials fee basis, if this contingency is not required, (and you will have authorized any additional effort in advance) then it will, of course, not be invoiced. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, RECEIVED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ?Ooe . F ust, PE FEB 2 61990 AM PM 718191101111121112i3j41516 02-219- O1 TRAFFIC STUDIES6 //�� , APPLICANT: CONSULTANTS: NAME: ' AV-7, u ` 4 C Ci G PHONE: PROJECT NAME: nn DESCRIPTION: DATE DEPOSIT FEES PAYMENT REMAINING BALANCE .�..�..�.ww wwwwww+.ww i RECEIPT - C[TY OFw NEW PORT BEACH i i OF p NEWPORT BEACH. CALIFORNIA 92663 No. 52120 i i �[IFOP�,P 19 C) , ATE 1 RECEIVED FROM 1 1 FOR: Grp �j Y+ f ( t 1 ACCOUNT NO. AMOUNT i DEPARTMENT .�j.w. . .. .err. .. .�..�.....�..ww.�..�..�..�..r..�.-- .w.�...�..�.w«...�..�..�..�..�.. Vendor: 163067 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Check Date: 4-17-90 Check: 235 invoice Invoice Date Reference Amount Retention Discount Net Amount 041390CR 4-13-90 TRAFFIC STUDY 3,850.00 3,850.00 8201 154100 158000 3,850.00 ----------- ----- ----------- ----------- Totals 3,850.00 0.00 0.00 3,850.00 Q SEW PO QT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH n P.O.BOX 1768,NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92659-1768 V � c-14,FoTt PLANNING DEPARTMENT (714) 644-3225 April 25, 1991 Tom Redwitz Vice President, Land Development The Irvine Company 550 Newport Ctr. Dr., Ste. 700 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8904 Dear Mr. Redwitz: Enclosed are the cover sheets for the Library Exchange Agreement EIR account and the • Corporate and Civic Plaza Traffic Analyses account respectively. To date, the Library Exchange Agreement account shows an existing balance of $3,8530.04 and the Traffic Analyses account has a remaining balance of $846.00. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Very truly yours, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director By Sandra L. Genis Principal Planner Enclosures SLG\ENV\ACCOUNT.'nC • 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach ®�®AUST/N-FOUST ASSOC/AYES, MO. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ANO TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 2020 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 TELEPHONE (714) 667-0496 FAX (714) 667-7952 February 22, 1990 City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 AT-3 ENTION: Ms. Patricia Temple, Planning Department SUBJECT: PROPOSAL - FASHION ISLAND ENTITLEMENT TRANSFER TRAFFIC STUDY Dear Patty: Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA) is pleased to respond to your RFP to conduct a TPO study of a proposed 19,560 square foot retail development on the southwest corner of Newport Center Drive and Santa Rosa Drive. In addition, we propose to do a related, but separate traffic study and parking analysis of the impact of this project on the city's General Plan. • We estimate the cost'of the TPO analysis to be between $1,500 and$2,500 depending upon the number of intersections identified for analysis by the City Traffic Engineer, and whether or not they pass the initial one percent test. Based on our past experience, we expect the actual cost will be near the middle ground of these figures. We estimate a cost not to exceed $3,500 for the General Plan impact traffic study. This estimate is based on utilizing the Newport Beach traffic model for distribution and assignment of revised travel patterns created by the shifting of entitlement This fee also includes an assessment of.emsting park nng conditions and the net effect of-the project on the available supply. We acknowledge that this fee includes a 20 percent contingency factor to allow for flexibility in the scope of work once we are underway on the study. We do not necessarily expect to exhaust the entire budget (frankly, we rarely do), but believe it is prudent to indicate that some flexibility is essential in this type of study. Since we are proposing a time and materials fee basis, if this contingency is not required, (and you will have authorized any additional effort in advance) then it will, of course, not be invoiced. I If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, RECEIVED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AM• ?oe . F nst, PE FEB 2 6 1990 PM i 7 19110111112t11213t4i5j6 7V o,2 aEW PART CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH U _ S P.O. BOX 1768,NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92659-1768 cq��oaN�r PLANNING DEPARTMENT (714) 644-3225 March 23, 1990 David Dmohowski Vice President, Entitlement Irvine Pacific Co. P.O. Box I 550 Newport Center Dr., #700 Irvine, CA 92658-8904 Subject: General Plan Study: Fashion Island/Newport North Transfer of Development Traffic Study Dear Mr. Dmohowski: The City of Newport Beach has received a proposal from the consultant firm of Austin- Foust Associates, Inc. to provide a traffic study and parking analysis of the impact of a proposed Fashion Island retail development on the City's General Plan. The fee requested for the traffic study and parking analysis has been reviewed by the City and the amount submitted for the tasks required is considered appropriate and warranted. To proceed with the study, please deposit the requested fees into your City account: Traffic Study $3,500.00 City Fee (10%) 350.00 Total: $3,850.00 Please make your check payable to the City of Newport Beach. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Very truly yours, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director By Patricia Temple- Principal Planner • JM\EIR-DOCS\ENT-TRAN.TIC Enclosure 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach i City Council Meeting February 25,1991 Agenda Item No. F-lo(a) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A General Plan Amendment 90-1(G)(Public Hearine) Request by the Irvine Company to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan to provide for Administrative Professional and Financial Commercial uses as an alternate use on the Pacific Telephone site (Camelback Street and Bison Avenue); and the acceptance of an environmental document. INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach AND B. Amendment No. 721 (Public Hearing) Request to amend the North Ford Planned Community District Regulations to provide for 20,000 square feet of office development on the Pacific Telephone site. AND C. Traffic Study No. 70 (Public Hearing) Request for a Traffic Study for proposed office development on the Pacific Telephone site. LOCATION: Lot 6, Tract No. 6680, located at 1177 Camelback Street, on the northwesterly corner of Bison Avenue and Camelback Street, in the North Ford Planned Community. ZONE: P-C AND D. Finding of General Plan Consistency (Discussion) Request by the Irvine Company for a finding of General Plan consistency for a transfer of 13,550 square feet of commercial development from the Pacific Telephone site to Fashion Island. TO: City Council - 2. INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach AND E. Amendment No. 701 (Public Hearing) Request to amend the Fashion Island Planned Community Development Regulations so as to increase the allowable development allocation by 13,550 square feet. AND F. Traffic Study No. 67 (Public Hearing) Request for a Traffic Study for increased square footage at Fashion Island. APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant Suggested Action If desired, set the following matters for public hearing at the city Council meeting of March 11, 1991: GPA 90-1(G). To amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan to provide for Administrative Professional and Financial Commercial uses as an alternate use on the Pactel site. Amendment No. 721. To amend the North Ford Planned Community District Regulations to provide for 20,000 square feet of office development on the Pactei site. Traffic Study No. 70. Traffic study for proposed office development on the Pacific Telephone site. Amendment No. 701. To increase permitted development in the Fashion Island Planned Community by 13,550 square feet. Traffic Study No. 67. Traffic study for entitlement transfer and increased square footage at Fashion Island. Finding of General Plan Consistency. Finding of General Plan consistency for a transfer of 13,550 square feet of commercial development from the Pacific Telephone site to Fashion Island. Acceptance of an environmental document for the above approvals. TO: City Council - 3. Applications Project Objective The above approvals are needed to accomplish the applicant's objective which is to gain entitlements for the construction of approximately 20,000 square feet of office space at the Pacific Telephone (Pactel) site located in the North Ford Planned Community and approximately 20,000 square feet of additional retail space at Fashion Island. Planning Commission Recommendation On February 7, 1991, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend to the City Council that the above applications be approved. Copies of the Planning Commission minutes and a more detailed staff report will be provided prior to the March 11, 1991 City Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director r By SANDRA GENIS Senior Planner \env\pacte1\cc2-25