Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTPO083_3767 BIRCH ST 1 TP0083 SEW PORE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH UP.O. BOX 1768,NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92659-L768 4W Oq</FO ft PLANNING DEPARTMENT (714) 644-3225 A zgust 15, 19.92__-- Mohle, Grover & Associates 901 E. Imperial Hwy # A La Habra, CA 90631 Subject: Traffic Phasing Ordinance Study for 3767 Birch Street, Newport Beach ( TPO # 83 ) Dear Mr. Grover: The City of Newport Beach Planning Department has received an application for an automobile repair and hand car wash facility on a site that is located at 3767 Birch Street in the City of Newport Beach. The proposed auto repair/wash services would require a TRAFFIC STUDY to determine the impact of the subject proposal on the City s Traffic Circulation System. The City invites you to submit a proposal to prepare a Traffic Phasing Ordinance Study for this project. If you are interested, at your earliest convenience, please submit a proposal to the City including project tasks, budget, and timing. Copies of development plans can be obtained from Mr. Geoff Herson of Superformance Costa Mesa Inc., 2950 Airway Ave. # A5, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714) 966-0999. For traffic data or technical questions please contact, Rich Edmonton, the City's Traffic Engineer at (714) 644-3344. Should you have any other question regarding this project, please contact me. Very truly yours, PLANNING DIRECTOR JAMES D. HEW10MR, DIRECTOR By Aziz M. Asiami Associate Planner P\WP51\...\A-6z A\TmTic\1WUt1 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach COMMISSIONERS • 0 0 MINUTES <<�'� °q� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH October 8, 1992 ROLL CALL INDEX 4. This use permit s ire unless exercised within 24 months from the date o a awl as specified in Section 20.80.090A of the Newport Bea icipal Code. A. Traffic Study No. 83 (Public Hearing) Item No.6 Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the conversion TS83 of an existing 21,000± square foot manufacturing building to an automobile repair facility with a hand car wash service. ur34s� R983 AND Approved B. Use Permit No. 3457 (Public Hearing) Request to permit the establishment of an automobile repair facility with a hand car wash and detailing service, on property located in the M-1-A District. Said proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to permit the use of tandem parking spaces for a portion of the proposed off-street parking spaces. AND C. Resubdivision No. 983 (Public Hearing) i Request to resubdivide one lot and a portion of a second lot into a single parcel of land for an automotive repair facility in the M-1- A District LOCATION: A portion of Lot 54 and Lot 55, Tract No. 3201, located at 3767 Birch Street, on the northwesterly side of Birch Street, between Bristol Street North and Quail Street, across from the Newport Place Planned Community. i -22- COMMISSIONERS MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH October 8, 1992 ROLL CALL WDEX ZONE: M-1-A APPLICANT: Superformance Costa Mesa Inc., Costa Mesa OWNER: M. J. Hogan Cabinet Company, Salt Lake City, Utah ENGINEER: Norris-Repke, Inc., Tustin Commissioner Pomeroy asked what are the costs for a Traffic Study and improvements to the sidewalk and driveway approaches?Patricia Temple,Advance Planning Manager,replied 'that a Traffic Study generally costs between $3,000.00 to $10,000.00, and the subject Traffic Study costs approximately $7,000.00. The cost of a Traffic Study is primarily determined by the number of intersections the City Traffic Engineer believes may be impacted by a proposed project. Don Webb, City Engineer, explained that the improvements adjacent to the subject property would cost less than $10,000.00 and the property owner and applicant would determine who would be responsible to pay the cost of the improvements. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. Jeff Hirson, 2950 Airway Avenue, Costa Mesa, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Hirson concurred with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A". There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. Motion * Motion was made and voted on to approve Traffic Study'No. 83, Ayes * * * * Use Permit No. 3457, and Resubdivision No. 983 subject to the Absent * * findings and conditions in Exhibit "A". MOTION CARRIED. -23- COMMISSIONERS MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH October 8, 1992 ROLL CALL INDEX A TRAFFIC STUDY: Approve the Traffic Study,making the findings listed below: FINDINGS: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the peak-hour traffic and circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project-generated traffic will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any 'major,' 'primary-modified,' or 'primary' street. 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project-generated traffic will not be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on all eleven of the eleven study intersections. B. USE PERMIT NO. 3457 FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed application is support service in nature and an intensification of use of the existing structure within the limits specified by Chapter 20.07 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, and as such, is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. That adequate parking exists on-site for the proposed development. 3. That the establishment of the subject business will not have any significant environmental impact. -24. COMMffiSIONERS 0 . MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH October 8, 1992 ROLL CALL INDEX 4. That the proposed modification to the Newport Beach Municipal Code so as to allow the use of tandem parking for a portion of the required on-site parking will not,under the circumstances of this case be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City, and further that the proposed modification is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of the Municipal Code. 5. That the approval of Use Permit No. 3457 will not, under the circumstances of this case,be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. CONDITIONS: 1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans and elevations, except as noted below. 2. That all conditions of approval of Resubdivision No. 983 shall be satisfied. 3. That all parking spaces shall be striped with approved traffic markers or painted white lines not less than 4 inches wide. 4. That the required number of handicapped parking spaces shall be designated within the on-site parking area and shall be used solely for handicapped self-parking. One handicapped sign on a post and one handicapped sign on the pavement shall be required for each handicapped space. -25- COMMIssIONERs MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 8 October , 1992 INDEX ROLL CALL 5. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened from Birch Street and adjoining properties. 6. That all automobile repairs shall be conducted within the building and no outdoor display of vehicles for sale shall be permitted. 7. That grease interceptors shall be provided in all drains within the building where petroleum residues may enter the sewer system, unless otherwise permitted by the Building Department. 8. That no outdoor sound system shall be utilized on-site. 9. That all employees shall park on-site at all times. 10. That all signs shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of Newport Beach Sign Code. 11. That the car wash area shall be protected so as to prevent drainage from the parking lot from entering the sewer system. The drain shall be connected to the sewer system and have a grease trap. The design and installation of the above facilities shall be approved by the Utilities Department. 12. That the outdoor storage of tires and other auto related parts or merchandise shall be prohibited on-site. 13. That the entire site shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner. 14. That the approval of this application shall permit complete engine rebuilding (including electrical and transmission repair), as well as tune-ups, lubrication, smog testing and brake service and installation. No painting, body work or other operations of a similar nature shall be permitted on- -26. COMMISSIONERS • MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH October 8, 1992 ROLL CALL MEX site unless an amendment to this use permit is approved by the Planning Commission. 15. That the Planning Commission may add or modify conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend to the City Council the revocation of this use permit, upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this use permit causes injury, or is detrimental to;the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the community. 16. This use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. RESUBDIVISION NO. 983 FINDINGS: 1. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 19.08.120 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. 5. That the flared drive apron on Birch Street will improve ingress and egress to the subject property. -27- COUMSSIONERS • MINUTES CH CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH October 8, 1992 ROLL CALL MEX LONDPITONS: 1. That a parcel map be recorded prior to occupancy. The parcel map shall be prepared on the California coordinate system(NAD83) and that prior to recordation of the parcel map,the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall submit to the County Surveyor a digital-graphic file of said map in a manner described in Section 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. 2. That prior to recordation of the parcel map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor in a manner described in Section s 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. Monuments (one inch iron pipe with tag) shall be set On Each Lot Corner unless otherwise approved by the Subdivision Engineer. Monuments shall be protected in place if installed prior to completion of construction project. 3. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 4. That arrangements be made with the Public Works Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to record a parcel map or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 5. That the on-site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer. 6. That the existing drive approach be reconstructed using the City's Flared Drive Approach Standard 166-L; that the on- -28- COPMOSSIONERS i MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH October 8, 1992 HME% ROLL CALL site drainage be collected and conveyed to Birch Street using a parkway drain; that the deteriorated sections of gutter and displaced sections of exposed aggregate concrete located between the sidewalk and the street curb be reconstructed along the Birch Street frontage and that the parkway landscaping along the Birch Street frontage adjacent to the driveway be pruned to provide sight distance in conformance with the City's Sight Distance Standard 110-L. All work shall be completed under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 7. That a sign, pavement markings and directional signs shall be posted at the site entrance that prohibits left turns from the site during peak traffic hours (3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. weekdays). The design and placement of the signage shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 8. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. 9. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission recessed at 8:45 p.m. and reconvened at 9:00 p.m. -29- Planning Commission Meeting October 8.1992 Agenda Item No. 6 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A Traffic Study No. 83 (Public Hearing) Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the conversion of an existing 21,000± square foot manufacturing building to an automobile repair facility with a hand car wash service. AND B. Use Permit No. 3457 (Public Hearing) Request to permit the establishment of an automobile repair facility with a hand car wash and detailing service, on property located in the M-1-A District. Said proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to permit the use of tandem parking spaces for a portion of the proposed off-street parking spaces. . AND C. Resubdivision No 983 (Public Hearing) Request to resubdivide one lot and a portion of a second lot into a single parcel of land for an automotive repair facility in the M-1-A District. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 54 and Lot 55, Tract No. 3201, located at 3767 Birch Street,on the northwesterly side of Birch Street,between Bristol Street North and Quail Street, across from the Newport Place Planned Community. ZONE: M-1-A APPLICANT: Superformance Costa Mesa Inc., Costa Mesa OWNER: M. J. Hogan Cabinet Company, Salt Lake City, Utah ENGINEER: Norris-Repke, Inc.;Tustin r TO: Planning Commission - 2 Application The applicant requests to permit the establishment of an automobile repair facility with a hand car wash and detailing service, on property located in the M-1-A District. Said proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to permit the use of tandem parking spaces for a portion of the proposed off-street parking spaces. In accordance with Section 20.42.025 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, automobile service stations and other uses which in the opinion of the Planning Commission are similar in character are permitted in the M-1-A District, subject to the securing of a use permit in each case. Use permit procedures are outlined in Chapter 20.80 of the Municipal Code. Traffic study procedures are set forth in Chapter 15.40 of the Municipal Code, and .modification procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.81. Environmental Significance This project has been reviewed„and it has been determined that it is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act under Class I (Existing Facilities). Conformance with.the General Plan The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the site for "Administrative, Professional and Financial Commercial' use. The proposed use is allowed under support retail and service use. The Land Use Element has also established area specific land use policies throughout the City. These "area"policies set a site-by-site-floor area ratio (F.A.R.) development limit of 0.5/.75 (Base Development Allocation is 23,925 square feet = 0.5 times the site area). Given that the application is for a renovation of an existing building with no additional square footage, the proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Land Use Element of the 'General Plan policies and guidelines. It should also be noted that the proposal involves the conversion of a manufacturing facility, a maximum FAR use to an automobile repair facility, a base FAR use which increases the weighted floor area ratio by 4,405 sq.ft. (21,222 sq.ft. - 16,817 sq.ft. = 4,405 sq.ft.) based on the particular uses. The resultant weighted development floor area is 21,222 sq.ft. which does not exceed the base development allocation of 23,925 sq.ft.. Subject Properly and Surrounding.Land Uses The subject property is 165 feet wide and 290 feet deep with land area of 47,850 square feet. The subject property is currently developed with a light industrial building (21,222 sq.ft.), an outdoor covered storage area (1,200± sq.ft., which will be demolished) and related on- site parking area. To the northeast, northwest,,and southwest are existing office buildings and a self storage facility with related parking areas; and to the southeast, across Birch Street, is Regency Corporate Place, a mixture of commercial office uses and support retail. TO: PlanninlgCommission - 3 Analysis The applicant is requesting to allow the establishment of a retail auto repair operation and a hand car wash facility. The subject property contains approximately 21,222± square feet of gross building floor area and an existing 1,200± sq.ft. outdoor covered storage area which will be removed. The facility will consist of 14 service bays for auto repair and another service bay for automobile detailing. There will also be a designated area for the washing of vehicles. The proposed hours of operation will be between 7:30 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday for the auto repair portion of the facility; and the hours of operation of the car wash portion of the facility will be between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. daily. The maximum number of employees will be eleven (11) for the auto repair facility and six (6) for the car wash portion of the facility. Off-Street Parking Requirement'for Proposed Business The Zoning Code does not include a specific parking requirement for establishments specializing in automobile repair; however, the parking requirement for automobile service stations is five parking spaces for each service bay. Inasmuch as the proposed operation involves office, storage, automobile repair and washing/detailing activities, it is staffs opinion that the most appropriate parking requirement would be five parking spaces for each service bay. Based on this formula, a total of 75 parking spaces would be required for the proposed operation (15 service bays x 5 = 75 parking spaces). The applicant is providing 69 on-site parking spaces plus the 15 service bays for a total of 84 vehicles. in The applicant is not proposing to erect any freestanding signs at this time on the subject property. The Zoning Ordinance limits the number of freestanding signs to one per building site and requires a minimum 15 foot front yard setback on Birch Street, unless a modification to the Zoning Code is approved. The applicant has indicated that any signs will be by separate arate permit in order to comply with the requirements of the Sign Ordinance. Traffic Study No. 83 The proposed use of an automobile repair use in conjunction with a car wash facility would generate a significantly higher traffic volume than the light industrial use. Therefore, a traffic study was required to determine the compatibility of the proposed project under the guidelines of the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance. A Traffic Study has been prepared for the proposed project in conformance with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance and City Council Policy S-1 to examine the consistency and conformity of the project with the City's Circulation Element. The City Traffic Engineer identified eleven (11) intersections which could be affected by the project at full occupancy as follows: 1. Jamboree Road at MacArthur Boulevard 2. Jamboree Road at Birch Street TO: Planning Commission - 4 3. Jamboree Road at Campus Drive 4. Campus Drive at MacArthur Boulevard 5. Birch Street at MacArthur Boulevard 6. Bristol Street North at Jamboree Road' 7. Bristol Street North at Campus Drive 8. Bristol Street North at Birch Street 9. Bristol Street South at Jamboree Road 10. Bristol Street South at Irvine Avenue 11. Bristol Street South at Birch Street The first step in evaluating intersection capacity is to conduct a 1% traffic volume analysis, taking into consideration existing traffic, regional growth, and committed projects' traffic. For any intersection where, on any approach leg, project traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of the projected peak 2-1/2 hour volume in either the morning or afternoon, Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) analysis would be required. The estimated average daily project traffic (ADT) generation is as follows: Land Use Vehicles Per Day Car Repair (Project) 75 Car Wash (Project) am Total 375 Credit For Existing Land Use 105 Credit For Internal Car Wash Per Day M Total-Credit 125 Project's Estimated Net Trip Generation: 375 - 125 = 250'Vehicle Per Day The net estimated 250 trip ends per day represent 16(4 in and 12 out) trip ends during a.m. peak periods and 40(20 in and 20 out) trip ends during p.m. peak traffic hours. The 1% volume test conducted at the eleven study intersections indicated that the traffic increase at each intersection leg from the proposed project was less than 1% of the projected 21/2 hour peak volume at all intersections evaluated. Therefore,no Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) calculation or any further analysis is required. Resubdivision The proposed Parcel No. 1 will be comprised of Lot No. 55 of Tract No. 3201 (115 ft..x 290 ft.)plus the southwesterly 50 feet of Lot 54 of Tract No. 3201 (50 ft.x 290 ft.) for an overall area of 47,850 sq.ft. (165 ft. x 290 ft. = 47,850 sq.ft.). TO. Planning Commission - 5 The following table has been prepared which sets forth the characteristics of the proposed parcel: Parcel No. Parcel Area Building (s.f) Floor Area Ratio 1 47,850 sq.ft. 21,222 0.443 The proposed parcel fully conforms to the commercial design standards as specified for the M-1-A District. The proposed resubdivision is for financing and conveyance purposes only, and no additional improvements are proposed. However, the Public Works Department, the City Traffic Engineer and the Planning Department have concerns related to the existing improvements, vehicular access and parking. Public Improvements Staff has observed that the existing public improvements on the site, namely sidewalks and drive approaches, are either damaged or nonconforming to City Standards. The Public Works Department has indicated that the damaged sections of sidewalks and drive approaches be repaired or replaced and that the parking lot be restriped, in conformance with City Standards. The appropriate conditions of approval have been included in the attached Exhibit "A". Vehicular Access and Parking As indicated on the attached site plan a total of 61 parking spaces are provided outside of the building (9 tandem spaces) and 8 parking spaces are provided within the building for parking. Vehicular ingress and egress will be by way of a single driveway which currently exists, but will be redesigned. The City Traffic Engineer has indicated that the required number of handicapped parking spaces must also be provided. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed on-site parking will be adequate to accommodate the proposed facility. Driveway Exitine As identified in the Summary Page of Traffic Study No. 83, the P.M. Peak results in backup of traffic on Birch Street which blocks the exit of the subject facility. Signage, pavement marking and other directional signs will therefore be required to prohibit the left turn movement out of the subject property northbound on Birch Street, between the hours of 3:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. weekdays. The appropriate condition of approval has been incorporated into the attached Exhibit "A". Modification The applicant is also requesting a modification to the Zoning Ordinance to allow the use of tandem parking in conjunction with the related parking lot. Nine of the proposed parking TO: Planning Commission - 6 spaces are designated as tandem parking spaces. The City Traffic Engineer has no objection to the use of the tandem parking spaces inasmuch as the vehicles parked in those spaces will be under the control of the employees servicing the vehicles. Specific Findings Chapter 15.40 of the Municipal Code requires that the Planning Commission make certain findings in conjunction with its approval of a traffic study. Section 20.80.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code provides that in order to grant any use permit, the Planning Commission shall find that the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use or building applied for will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. Section 19.12.020 (D) of the Municipal Code provides that in order to approve a resubdivision, the Planning Commission shall determine that it is satisfied with the plan of subdivision, that the map is in conformity,with the requirements of Title 19, all ordinances of the City and all applicable generatand specific plans. Should the Planning Commission wish to approve Traffic Study No. 83,Use Permit No.3374 and Resubdivision No. 983,the actions,findings and conditions of approval set forth in the attached Exhibit "A" are suggested. No exhibit for denial has been provided,inasmuch as staff is of the opinion that no findings may be reasonably made in support of the denial of these applications. However, should information may be presented at the public hearing which warrants a denial of these applications, the Planning Commission may wish to take such an action. PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWI KER, Director By W JAVIER S. GARCIA Senior Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" Vicinity Map Letter from the Applicant Describing the Proposed Operation Copy of Traffic Study No. 83 Plot Plan, Floor Plan, and Elevations Tentative Parcel Map F:\WP51\JAY-O\UP\AUTO\UP3457SR TO: Plannin?Commission - 7 • EXHIBIT,"A" FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 83 USE PERMIT NO.,3457 AND RESUBDIVISION NO. 983 A. TRAFFIC STUDY: Approve the Traffic Study, making the findings listed below: FINDINGS: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the peak-hour traffic and circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project-generated traffic will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any 'major; 'primary-modified; or 'primary' street. 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project-generated traffic will not be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on all eleven of the eleven study intersections. 13. iJSE PERMIT NO. 3457 FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed application is support service in nature and an intensification of use of the existing structure within the limits specified by Chapter 20.07 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, and as such, is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. That adequate parking exists on-site for the proposed development. 3. That the establishment of the subject business will not have any significant environmental impact. 4. That the proposed modification to the Newport Beach Municipal Code so as to allow the use of tandem parking for a portion of the required on-site parking will not, under the circumstances of this case be, detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property, or improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City, and further that the proposed modification is consistent with the legislative,intent of Title 20 of the Municipal Code. TO: planning Commission - 8 ` 5. That the approval of Use Permit No. 3457 will not, under the circumstances of this case,be detrimental to the health,safety,peace,morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. CONDITIONS: 1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans and elevations, except as noted below. 2. That all conditions of approval of Resubdivision No. 983 shall be satisfied, 3. That all parking spaces shall be striped with approved traffic markers or painted white lines not less than 4 inches wide. 4. That the required number of handicapped parking spaces shall be designated within the on-site parking area and shall be used solely for handicapped self-parking. One handicapped sign on a post and one handicapped sign on the pavement shall be required for each handicapped space. 5. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened from Birch Street ,and adjoining properties. 6. That all automobile repairs shall be conducted within the building and no outdoor display of vehicles for sale shall be permitted. 7. That grease interceptors shall be provided in all drains within the building where petroleum residues may enter the sewer system, unless otherwise permitted by the Building Department. 8. That no outdoor sound system shall be utilized on-site. 9. That all employees shall park on-site at all times. 10. That all signs shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of Newport Beach Sign Code. 11. That the car wash area shall be protected so as to prevent drainage from the parking lot from entering the sewer system. The drain shall be connected to the sewer system and have a grease trap. The design rand,installation of the above facilities shall be approved by the Utilities Department., 12. That the outdoor storage of tires and other auto related parts or merchandise shall be prohibited on-site. TO. Planning ommission - 9 13. That the entire site shall be maintained'in a clean and orderly manner. 14. That the approval of this application shall permit complete engine rebuilding (including electrical and transmission repair); as well as tune-ups, lubrication, smog testing and brake service and installation. No painting, body work or other operations of a similar nature shall be permitted on-site unless an amendment to this use permit is approved-by the Planning Commission. 15. That the Planning Commission may add or modify conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend to the City Council the revocation of this use permit, upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this use permit causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the community. 16. This use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. RESUBDIWSION NO, 983 FINDINGS: 1. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning Commission'is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 19.08.120 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. 5. That the flared drive apron on Birch Street will improve ingress and egress to the subject property. CONDITIONS: 1. That a parcel map be recorded prior to occupancy. The parcel map shall be prepared on the California coordinate system(NAD83) and that prior to recordation of the parcel map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall submit to the Surveyor a digital-graphic file of said ma in a manner desc ribed in Section County P tY Y 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. TO: tanning Commission- 10 • r 2. That prior to recordation of the parcel map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor in a manner described in Section s 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticie 18. Monuments (one inch iron pipe with tag) shall be set On Each Lot Corner unless otherwise approved by the Subdivision Engineer. Monuments shall be protected in place if installed prior to completion of construction project. 3. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 4. That arrangements be made with the Public Works Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to record a parcel map or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 5. That the on-site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer. 6. That the existing drive approach be reconstructed using the City's Flared Drive Approach Standard 166-L; ,that the on-site drainage be collected and conveyed to Birch Street using a parkway drain; that the deteriorated sections of gutter and displaced sections of exposed aggregate concrete located between the sidewalk and the street curb be reconstructed along the Birch Street frontage and that the parkway landscaping along the Birch Street frontage adjacent to the driveway be pruned to provide sight distance in conformance with the City's Sight Distance Standard 110-L. All work shall be completed under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 7. That a sign, pavement markings and directional signs shall be posted at the site entrance that prohibits left turns from the site during peak traffic hours (3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. weekdays). The design and placement of the signage shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 8. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. 9. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been recorded within-3 years of the date of approval,unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. *vicinity Map Traffic Study No. 83 Use Permit No.3457 Resubdivison No. 983 N aT c� Orange County Airport a TT\ v @ Jw JJ Q Project 'Location @t v° ♦1 TT °4 I J Ow 4@ yw t w Jw @\ M aJ wJ wo t OT OT 6A tJa T@ {p . °w .+ fit T Ot tTTT fwJw t e� srA n AA s Tg@ \ • C PURPOSE OF APPLICATION FOR SUPERFORMANCE COSTA MESA INC. It is proposed that the existing building located at 3767 Birch St. , Newport' Beach, described as Lot 55 and I Southwest Portion of Lot 54 of Tract #3201 , recorded' in book 130 pages 25-30, will be used for the service and repair of Mercedes Benz, Bmw, and Porsche automobiles. All work is to be done inside of the building in designated work areas with ample space for the parking of work completed or in progress. There will be 14 work bays, 7 with above ground hoists that are bolt down type installation. 1 bay area will be used for detailing. The hand wash is located inside of •the building. All drainage is connected to the existing clarifier and a recycling syst�tm will be installed to reduce water and sewage usage." The car wash requires 3 to 5 gallons of fresh water for the final rinse of the automobile. The existing clarifier is a three stage system with 500 gallon receiving pit, a 500 gallon dilution area and a 500 gallon out-fall tank to which a pump and a sand filter will be connected and 95% of the wash is them done with recycled water. The volume of cars washed will be approximately 20 cars per day from our service department spread over the 8 hour day. These cars will be washed and then parked in a parking space, waiting for the respective customers to pick up their serviced automobiles. An additional approximate six cars per hour will be washed for our customers that do not have their cars in for service at our service department. Serviced cars will be parked and returned to the customers by an attendant. A waiting and reception area is provided to the customer. • J 1 i �1 • • TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR i CAR REPAIR AND CAR WASH FACILITY IN THE -� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PREPARED FOR -� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH FRY SEPTEMBER 1992 y�F tic k N . 0692 Exp. 31-92 PREPARED BY srgT C1v1%. F CF c� TR�C N 0890N 0890 DATE . • y L mag Mohle, Grover & Associates 1� 901 E imperial Hwy. Ste. A. La Habra, CA 90631 • (714)738-3471 • FAX (714)738-7802 i 13 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION- 1 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 3. STUDY INTERSECTIONS I 4. COMMITTED PROJECTS 1 5. REGIONAL GROWTH FACTOR 5 6. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 5 6.1 Trip Generation 5 6.2 Trip Distribution 6 6.3 Trip Assignment 6 7. ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS 12 8. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS 12 9. SITE ACCESS 12 10. SUMMARY 14 n LIST OF TABLES h! TABLE PAGE 1 Study Intersections 2 2 Trip Generation Rates and Project Trip Ends 7 3 Study Intersections One Percent n Analysis Summary 13 t! ' i1 �y LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1 Location Map 3 2 Site Plan 4 3 Trip Distribution- Project- Inbound 8 4 Trip Distribution-'Project- Outbound 9 5 Peak Hour Inbound A.M./P.M. Traffic Volumes - Project 10 6 Peak Hour Outbound A.M./P.M. Traffic Volumes - Project 11 APPENDICES APPENDIX "A" Committed Projects List "B" Regional Growth Factor "C" Trip Generation Rates and Trip'Generation Survey "D" One Percent Analysis Work Sheets i� 1� Traffic Impact S Newport Beach Car Repair and Car Wash 14 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 1. INTRODUCTION -� The purpose of this report is to present the findings of a traffic impact study, for the proposed car repair and car wash facility at 3767 Birch Street, in the City of Newport Beach. The proposed project consists of 15 bays for repairing cars and approximately a half acre car wash facility. The locations of the project with regional context is shown in Figure 1. Presently on-site, there exists an industrial building of 21,000 square feet. This exist- ing facility will be replaced by the proposed project. The specific site plan of the proposed project is shown in Figure 2. the entrance and exist to the project site is through Birch Street as shown in Figure 2. 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS The major access roads to the project site are Birch Street, Von Karman Avenue, Campus Drive, Bristol Street, Bristol Street North, and Jamboree Road. The area surrounding the project site is well developed from a traffic point of view. There are various land uses such as commercial, offices and restaurants which exist in the vicini- ty of the project and a well developed road network serves the area. A majority of'the key intersections are signalized and are provided with.exclusive left turn pockets. 3. STUDY INTERSECTIONS Eleven intersections were recommended by the City Traffic Engineer for conducting Level of Service (LOS) analysis per City guidelines,during a.m. and p.m. peak peri- ods. The study intersections Are listed in Table 1. The study intersections were analyzed for the following traffic scenarios: 1) Existing Traffic Volumes 2) Existing Plus Growth Factor Plus Committed Project Volumes 3) Cumulative Traffic Volumes (Includes Proposed Project Traffic) The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method was used for conducting LOS. The LOS was based on criteria of analysis developed by the City ofNewport Beach Traffic Ordinance and Methodology. 4. COMMITTED PROJECTS The City Traffic Engineer provided a list of committed projects and the committed projects cumulative traffic volumes at the study intersections. The committed projects are those projects already approved by the City. These committed projects could be in various stages of development or completion. The list of committed projects are given in Appendix "A". L iQ 1 . Traffic Impact Study, Newportl&ch Wepair and Car Wash I TABLE 1 STUDY INTERSECTIONS* Study Intersections 1. Jamboree Road/Macarthur Boulevard 2. Jamboree Road/Birch Street 3. Jamboree Road/Campus Drive 4. MacArthur Boulevard/CampusDrive 5. MacArthur Boulevard/Birch Street 6. Bristol Street North/Jamboree Road 7. Bristol Street North/Campus Drive 8. Bristol Street North/Birch Street 9. Bristol Street/Jamboree Road 10. Bristol Street/Campus Drive-Irvine Avenue 11. Bristol Street/Birch Street •-As recommended by the City of Newport Beach 2 Traffic Impact Studtewport Beach Car Repair and Car Wash 7 Oq• 73 i y4 I, g tl� � (I■� Ri,� Jl � '�c3' t� I WE t� �SrCr Sf 1� Sr IRVINE NEWPORT BEACH otaK OIL CHANNEL gpN • =NOT TO SCALE STUDY INTERSECTIONS 4 MGj1 LOCATION MAP FIGURE 1 NPCARWSH 3 f b' Traffic Impact Study, Newpor*ch (Wepair and Car Wash I� 1 1• I 1 ` lk : � it a P" .: 7 � a 1 P mGq SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 r _' 4 MUHLE .bKUVtK 6 H"Ut. U . l14-(00-10U4 U%WJ. Vc ♦" .Vv ,}U .Vvv .V+ Traffic Impact Study,-Newport Deitch Car Repair and Car Wash 5. REGIONAL GROWTH FACTOR The City provided growth rate on all major access roads to the project. Appropriate growth rates were applied to obtain existing plus growth factor traffic volumes. The City supplied growth factor data is given in Appendix "B". The largest growth rate is 5% on MacArthur Boulevard between-Pacific Coast Highway and Jamboree Road. 6. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS This study analysis the traffic impact of the proposed project for the Year 1992 on the existing road network. The following sections deal with Trip Generation, Trip Distri- bution, and Trip Assignment. 6.1 Trip Generation " The proposed project is to build a car repair and car wash facility on BIrch Street. Trip Generation rates for the car repair facility with•15 bays was developed by conducting aTrip-Generation Study at an existing facility (7 bays) located in Costa Mesa (Superformance, Airway Avenue, Costa Mesa). The details of-tho Up Generation Survey and calculations related to trip rates for the car repair facility is given in Appendix "C". The Trip Generation rates for the car wash was obtained from San Diego Association of Governments, Trip Generation Data. The proposed car wash facility Is approximately a half acre in size. The number of employees from both Car Repairs and Car Wash will be 17. Trip Generation Rates for employees was obtained from I.T.B. Trip Genera- tion Handbook, 5th Edition, 1991. The Trip Generation rates for the existing land use (industrial)was provided by the City Traffic Engineer. The Trip Generation rates and Trip ends for study land uses are given in Table 2. Trip reductions were done for existing 'land use and pass by trips for car wash facility. The estimated-average daily project traffic is as follows: Lwd Use yehis es Per Dav Car Repair (Project 75 Car Wash (Project) Tbtalc 3M Reduction (Existing Land Use) -105 Reduction (Internal Car Wash Per Day) M Total; 250 The project generates a net estimated 250 trip ends per day with 16 (4In and 12 out) trip ends during a.m. peak periods and 40 (20 In and 20 cut) trip ends during p.m..peak periods, respectively. 5 i Traffic Impact S`tud"y, Nevoeach Repair and Car Wash S 6.2 Trip Distributions - 1 The trip distribution of the project generated traffic was done in consultation with the City Traffic Engineer. Taken into consideration were the existing turning movement volumes and anticipated routes by employees and customers to the project. Also taken into consideration were the existing network and land uses. The trip distribution to the project site is as shown in Figures 3 and 4. Figure 3 shows the inbound and Figure 4 shows the outbound trip distribu- tion of project generated traffic. 6.3 Traffic Assignment Trips assignment involves determining the estimated number of trip end that will use the road network based on trip generation and trip distribution. The project generated traffic assignment during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours is shown in Figures 5 and 6. Figure 5 shows the inbound project traffic assign- ment during the A.M. and the P.M. peak hours. � 6 Traffic Impact Study, port Beach Car Repair and Car Wash TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION RATES AND PROJECT TRIP ENDS 1 Trip GA je�n� ration Rates 1� 4s3>sF. lyI R ` Land Use Units Peak Hr. Peak 2.1/2.Hr. Peak Hr. Peak 2.1/2 Hr. In Out In Out In Out In Out Industriai(1) 1,000 SF 0.8 0.2 1.6 0.4 0A 0.7 0.8 1A Car Wash(2) OS Acres 6 6 12 12 14 14 28 28 Car Repair Bay(3) 1 058 0.29 1.16 0a 0.43 057 0.86 1.14 Employees(4) 1 0.46 0.07 1 0.92 0.14 0.08 0.51 0.16 1.02 Project Tr1p Ends Ate, . • P,M Land Use Units Peak Hr. Peak 2.1/2 Hr.* Peak Hr. Peak 2.1/2 Hr. In Out In Out In Out In Out Car Wash OS Acres 6 6 12 12 14 14 28 28 Car Repair Bay 15 9 4 18 8 6 9 12 18 Employees 10 5 1 10 2 4 5 2 10 TOTAL 20 11 40 22 21 28 42 56 Existing Land Use(5) 21 KSF 17 4 34 8 8 15 16 30 TOTAL 3 7 6 14 13 13 26 26 Passer By Trips(6)....20% 1 1 2 2 3 3 6 6 Final Project Trip Ends 2 6 4 12 10 10 20 20 Note: (1)-Trip rates provided by City (2)-Son Diego Association of Governments (3)-Trip rates for Trip Generation Survey,Appendix"C" (4)-Employees for car repair and car wash; I.T.E.Trip Rates,Slh Ed., 1991. (5)-Reduction In trip ends for existing land use �I (6)-Reduction in trip ends for passer-by trips to car wash only(includes repair cars washed on-site) 'J • -Multiplied by 2 �I ' Traffic Impact Study, Newposach Repair and Car Wash 60% 40% 30% c9�Q 10%j, 30gJ 30% s 10% 60 1/ 73 m 20 20 f% 5~ 0 10% �15% lox 5 NE *JE 20 Bps sr IRN / r eP�sT sT 15% sT IRVINE NEWPORT �15% BEACH CREEK DR. CHANNEL 0 � 15% SPe I • = STUDY INIERSECIIONS NOT TO SCALE t Maq TRIP DISTRIBUTION - PROJECT FIGURE 3 INBOUND NPCARWSH ! 8 2 J Traffic Impact Stu Aewport Beach Car Repair and Car Wash F n 60% 40 40% aR ox � lox 30x 30% 10% 5% 73 m 2oz sr. 10R 5% y�607. � 20% 107 i NNE I��AUUU 10% 10% 20 . 15 . 200 NEWPORT S. IRVINE 57, BEACH CREEK CHANNEL �{ � 15 . I� SpN D�E% 15.1 •= STUDY INTERSECTIONS NOT TO SCALE i TRIP DISTRIBUTION - PROJECT FIGURE 4 maq (C OUTBOUND II NPCARWSN '' 9 Jh Traffic Impact Study, NewPoeach W Repair and Car Wash 1/6 e 1/4 ,/3 S 5 � 1/3/ 0/30/1 0• 0 4 f 73 m � 2 0/0 �~ o • 0/0 0/1 0/2 9 e'P/Sj� Sl y eA/ sl 0�d' 0/1 slg 1/t sr IRVINE NEWPORT f BEACH CREEK CHANNEL OR. s� \ LEOEND • = STUDY INTERSECTIONS XX/YY = A.M./P.M. VPH NOT TO SCALE i PEAK HOUR INBOUND A.M/P.M. maq TRAFFIC VOLUMES — PROJECT FIGURE 5 I � - NPCARWSH 105 Traffic Impact Study,NewpoBeach i8ar Repair and Car Wash r 4/6 2/4 nR 2/3 ��2/s �S o/t 2/3 2/3 9P 1/2 73 4 1/ 1/2 /1 y� m 1/2 0A �6 g 0/0 0/1 t HE Sri � �SjCr Sp 0Qa 0/1 1/ IRVINE / 0/0 °/ /2 NEWPORT 0/° �IANN�= BEACH CREEK DR. 1 SpN i/1I LEGEND i • . STUDY INTERSECTIONS XX/YY • A.M./P.M. VPH NOT TO SCALE NOTE LEFT 'URNS OUTBOUND FROM DRIVEWAY BETWEEN 3 TO 6 P.M. IS PROHIBITED Maq. PEAK HOUR OUTBOUND A.M/P.M. FIGURE 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES _ PROJECT NPCARM i t Traffic Impact Study, Newoseach Or Repair and Car Wash 7. ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS In conducting one percent analysis per the City of Newport Beach guidelines, one percent of the 2 1/2 hour A.M. and P.M. peak hour traffic volumes are utilized to determine if the project's corresponding 2 1/2 hour peak hour traffic volume exceeds or is less than the above volume for all approaches at the study intersections. In case the project volume "DOES NOT EXCEED" the one percent of the existing plus regional growth factor plus committed project volume, no ICU analysis is con- ducted for that particular peak hour for the intersection. On the other hand, if the project traffic volume "fails" the one percent test, that is the project volume exceeds one percent of the existing volume plus regional growth factor volume plus committed project volume, and ICU analysis is performed. Table 3 shows the summary of one percent analysis. S. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS All study intersections satisfy the 1% analysis criteria. Therefore, per City guidelines no ICU Analysis is required. 9. SITE ACCESS Site access is through Birch Street. It is recommended that proper directional pave- ment markings for left and right turning vehicles be provided at the driveways. Due to the observed backing up of southbound right turns and the proximity of the project driveway to the intersection of Bristol Street and Birch Street, all outbound left-turn (northbound) from the driveway are recommended to be prohibited between 3 to 6 p.m. on peak periods. It is required to install adequate traffic control devices at the driveway to prohibit northbound left-turns during p.m. peak periods. 12 �27 i ' Traffic Impact Study, Aort Beach 'Car Repair and Car Wash TABLE 3 STUDY INTERSECTIONS ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS' SUMMARY Do the Intersections Satisfy One Percent Study Intersections Analysis? AX l 1 1. Jamboree Road/Macarthur Boulevard Yes Yes 2. Jamboree Road/Bircb Street Yes Yes 3. Jamboree Road/Campus Drive Yes Yes 1 4. MacArthur Boulevard/Campus Drive Yes Yes S. MacArthur Boulevard/Birch Street Yes Yes 6. Bristol Street North/Jamboree Road Yes Yes 7. Bristol Street North/Campus Drive Yes Yes 8. Bristol Street North/Birch Street Yes Yes '1 9. Bristol Street/Jamboree Road Yes Yes 10. Bristol Street/Campus Drive-Irvine Avenue Yes Yes 9 11. Bristol Street/Birch Street Yes Yes 13 �� MUHLE ,bKUVLK 6 Hbbul. ILI : -(.DO_fou/ Ul. , U1 14 •J4 14U .VVQ i .V� Traffic Impact Study, NewpoIeach Repair and Car Woh 10. SUMMARY a The project generates a net estimated 250 trip ends per day, with 16 and 40 ends include trip end r ends eductions s due to existieak ng land use and pass be above y (20%)trips due to car wash. ■ The car repair (bays) trip rates for a.m. and p.m. peak period was ob- tained by conducting a trip generation survey. A total of eleven intersections were analyzed for LOS. ■ All intersections satisfy the 1% analysis and do not need ICU analysis per City guidelines. Considering the backing of (southbound right-turn) traffic during p.m. peak period at the intersection of Bristol Street and Birch Street and the proximity of the project driveway to this Intersection, all outbound left turns (northbound) are recommended to be prohibited between 3 and 6 p.m. peak period. 0 It is required to install adequate traffic control and pavement markings (directional) per City guidelines at the driveways. r The project traffic does not have any significant impact on the study intersections. inn.newport.ro 14 :�9 f� T . 1 l 't 1 1 ,� APPENDICES POOR QUALITY ORIGINAL (S) i 1 ' APPENDIX "A" Committed Projects List it r v•1rf. . 2SPORT ON APFRCVEC PRCJ �VOLUNES nOJ—N6R ALL PROJECTS ON FILE: APPROVED VCLUME IS WEIGHTED EY : 7C1 HUGHES AIRCRAFT a1 1C.;A OCCUPANCY C,C2 SUNSETTEp 4C-31 OCCUPANCY 0:13 FAR WEST SAVINGS AND' LOAN lZJ2 OCCUPANCY 3C4 SUPERSEDED ]GQX UCCLPANCY .iJS AERONUTRCNIC FORD 1_v2 JCCJPANCY 000 SACK SAY CFFICE 1C'0'X OCCUPANCY 007 bOYLE ENGINEERING ld,, % OCCUPANCY CO3 CAL CANADIAN SANK 10GX OCCUPANCY 009 CIVIC PLAZA a39X OCCUPANCY u1C CORPORATE PLAZA C3CX OCCUPANCY KJLL CENTER NEWPORT 1'G02 OCCUPANCY ill MACARTHUR COURT 1Cv2 OCCUPANCY 1413 SUPERSEDED OGJX OCCUPANCY 014 SUPERSEDED 00132 OCCUPANCY 1315 ORCHARD OFFICE 1'Ct1 OCCUPANCY 016 PACIFIC MUTUAL PLAZA 1002 OCCUPANCY 017 3701 2IFCH OFFIC- 1Gu% OCCUFANCY 01& NEWPORT PLACE J912 OCCUPANCY 019 SUNSETTED OuGX OCCUPANCY 020 BANK OF NEMPORT lQ02 OCCUPANCY C21 6AYSICE SQUARE 1i12 OCCUPANCY J22 SEA 1SLANC 1 :=X OCCUPANCY .2-3 3AYWCCO AFARTMENTS 1CLA OCCUPANCY 324 HAR'?OR POINT HOMES 1=72 OCCUPANCY C25 ROGER' S GARDENS 1 vX OCCUPANCY 026 SEAVIEW LUTHERAN PLAZA 1:u2 OCCUPANCY �?7 RUOY EARCN 1CoX OCCUPANCY 32-5 GLAIL COSINESS CENTER 10,'tA OCCUPANCY C79 441 `EUPORT BLVD. 1CCx CCCUFANCY •.;:;7 MARTHA 'S VINEYARD 11C:X OCCUPANCY :31 VALDEEZ - 'Q',2 OCCUPANCY ??2 COAST 9uSiNESS CENTER 1GVX CCCUPANCY '33 KOLL CENTER NPT NO . 1 TPP OCUX OCCUPANCY "p c3s SEE PROJECTS 340 TC 343 Uc:i2 OCCUPANCY 7 J35 ROSS MOLLARD 1 .^'jZ CCCUFANCY #� 236 SUNSETTEp 4C-uX OCCUPANCY L 539 HUGHES AIRCRAFT ;2 10WIX OCCUPANCY 134.3 SUP S<C=DEED 16 X OCCUPANCY 341 FLAGSPIF HCSPIT4L 1 CX OCCUPANCY AIG CANYON ICV :Z4X OCCUPANCY :463 FLN ZC\E i :JX JCCUF=NCY ` # 'u44 MARRICTT HCTEL 1vu2 OCCUPANCY f "45 ST. A1DAE'%S CHURCH 11-1X OCCUPANCY 340 YMCA , QQ; OCCUPANCY 'If' a Cal ALL EU CONDOS 1^.•:A OCCUPANCY MCRGN DEVELOPMENT 1r. 3X OCCUPANCY FOUR aEASCNS HOTEL 11.J2 CCCUFANCY UNIV 4TH CLUr' TPP 4 EMKAY 1C X OCCUPANCY "ri`"q"s1 • !LOCK :;r MEDICAL 1 :•uA OCCUPANCY SEE ;'nCJECTS 53C TO 533 rOVX CCCUFANCY r xt k n` " "6 32 TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE REPORT ON APPROVE- 0 PROJECT VOLUMES 354 AMEND NO 1 MCARTHUR CCURT c152% OCCUPANCY ',56 AMEN OMcNT hC 2 FORD 45RC 1002 CCCUPANCY 357 CARVER GRANVILLE OFFICE 1Gu2 OCCUPANCY J58 CORONA DEL MAR HONES 100% OCCUPANCY 059 dIG CANYON VILLA APTS. Ori;t CCCUPANCY .3h0 14C^ DOVE STREET 353X OCCUPANCY Obi 11CC cLAIL STREET '.?r.X. 000L•PANCY •362 SUPERSEDED 001.22 OCCUPANCY Jo3 KOLL CENTER TPP AMEND . 4A 0002 OCCUPANCY C44 SUNSETTED OCCUPANCY Ce5 ROSAN' S DEVELOPMENT 0952 CCCUPANCY 0b3 BLOCK 500 NPT CTR PROJ 1COX OCCUPANCY 008 NEWPORT AQUATICS CENTER 045A OCCUPANCY 369 2600 a COAST ti'dY 1 CIOA OCCUPANCY 073 JASMINE PARK 1G02 OCCUPANCY 071 SUNSETTED '3Ga2 OCCUPANCY 072 NEhPORTER INN EXPANSION 1COX OCCUPANCY s73 SUNSETTED •3032 OCCUPANCY j'74 SuNScTTEED 00,�I OCCUPANCY '375 FAS(iION IS RENAISSANCE 11:02 OCCUPANCY 076 SUNSETTED r-l0X OCCUPANCY 077 CDM SENIOR PROJECT 10J2 OCCUPANCY 'J78 POINT DEL MAR 1C•32 OCCUPANCY C79 PACIFIC CLLE 1Z.02 OCCUPANCY Oar, SUNSETTED %02 OCCUPANCY ;81 NEEkPCRT SEACREST APT 1i.6x OCCUPANCY Oda 3eC;? CAMPUS DR(M—STORAGE) 0732 OCCUPANCY L't4 HOAC CANCER CENTER O0•JX OCCUPANCY C35 EDwARDS NEkPORT CENTER UG X CCCUPANCY ud6 SEASIDE APTS ( y'ESA II) 1C: x OCCUPANCY :67 VICTORIA STATION (OFFICE ) 1G32 OCCUPANCY y 488 3760 CAMPUS 040—STORAGE) UQQ OCCUPANCY 11 6: 9 vElAPORT INPCRTS 1":3X OCCUPANCY ;9C SUPERSEDED :C .JX OCCUPANCY 092 MARINERS ' MILE MARINE CTR 1j01% OCCUPANCY 393 15TR STREET APARTMENTS 1C.'LX OCCUPANCY 694 SEASIDE APARTMENTS III 11; X OCCUP;NCY 95 NPT 8AY RETIREMENT INN uG '/. OCCU�AhCY u96 NE•R°ORT CLASSIC INN -32 OCCUPANCY C97 MAR.NERS CHURCH =XPANSION 3G3% OCCUPANCY :96 MCLACHLAN—NEk'FORT PL OCCUPANCY 099 13C1 SUEE;ICR MEDICAL 1 'J3 OCCUPANCY 1 :13 FASHICN ISLAND a2 OC: X' OCCUPANCY iC1 N=kP;RTER RESORT EXPAND . J': ;X OCCUPANCY 1C2 SUNSETTED C�02k CCCUPANCY 103 NEkPORT LIaC MED CENTER .903 OCCUPANCY 1"4 VILLA DOINT JCoX OCCUPAhCY 105 SHOKAIAN Jr.,"% OCCUPANCY f 1 'b 15TH ST AFTS 0,•]X OCCUPANCY lu7 ROCKWEELL EXFANSION :Q32 OCCUPANCY 1C8 ANDREk RESTAURANT • Q':'32 OCCUPANCY 109 dAL30A / kASHINGTON 30'aX OCCUPANCY 1 % NE'ePORT IMPORTS REST . 00=x CCCUPANCY X 33 0 TRAFFIC PHASING ORCINAYCE gg?ORT ON APPRCVE^v PROJECT VOLUMES 111 2ETh ST MARINA PROJECT J1vX OCCUPANCY 112 tiM9ROSIA RESTAURANT ZC,)E OCCUPANCY 113 CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION 1�02 OCCUPANCY 114 OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS 1C33 OCCUPANCY 115 ZONTA CLUE RESIDENTIAL 'i7:)Z OCCUPANCY ` 14A 2E1`45TREEET ISLAND 0002 OCCUPANCY 117 VILLA POINT II OS02 OCCUPANCY 11E TACC BELL (FAST FOOD) 1i3OX CCCUPANCY 119 FASHION ISLAND TRANSFER GOv% OCCUPANCY 120 PACIFIC SELL SITE 00J% OCCUPANCY J 121 NEWPORT VILLAGE u^'jz aCCUP4NCY 122 CASTAWAYS MARINA ]r12 OCCUPANCY 123 KOLL CENTER CARL' S JR 43.72 OCCUPANCY 124 CIVIC PLAZA 00--X OCCUPANCY 125 CORPORATE PLAZA S WEST uC'JX OCCUPANCY 127 6URGSSS COMMERCIAL CENTER COC'X OCCUPANCY 12E HARdOR• F'ACIFIC PLAZA v: X CCCUF�NCY 1219 HOAG HOSPITAL EXTENSION JOGx CCCMPANCY 340 A•4SNOMENT NO, 1 FORD AERC 1U�x OCCUPANCY 341 AMENDMENT NC. 1 fO•RO AERO i100% OCCUPANCY 342 AMENDF-NT NC. 1 FCRO AERO JOJ2 OCCUPANCY 343 AM_NDN=NT NO. 1 FORD A'cR0 JGJX OCCUPANCY 333 AMENDMENT NO 1 NORTH FORD 1COA OCCUPANCY 531 AMENDMENT NC 1 NORTH FORD 1002 OCCUPANCY j32 aMENOM�NT NO 1 NCRTH FORD 11' 2 OCCUPANCY 533 AMENDMENT NO 1 NOPTH FORD JG5% OCCUPANCY 515 IRVINE PROJECT 40)CX OCCUPANCY 910 NEWPORT DUNES Xi)2 OCCUPANCY 92v 9AYVI =W _i:jX OCCUPANCY 930 CITY CF IR•VINE CEV . Jcl'3 OCCUPANCY J: f 1 t 1 ' 3`� 1 APPENDIX "B ' Regional Growth Factor CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANNIIAL GROWTH RATE COAST HIGHWAY East city limit to MacArthur Boulevard 2$ MacArthur Boulevard to Jamboree Road 2% Jamboree Road to Newport Boulevard 2% Newport Boulevard to west city limit 4% IRVINE AVENUE All 2.5% JAMBOREE ROAD Coast Highway to San Joaquin Hills Road 3% San Joaquin Hills Road to Bison 2$ Bison to Bristol 1% Bristol to Campus it MACARTHUR BOULEVARD Coast Highway to San Joaquin Hills Road 6% San Joaquin Hills Road to north city limit 3% NEWPORT BOULEVARD Coast Highway to north city limit it Street ' segments not listed are assumed to have 0% regional growth. 3� APPENDIX "C" Trip Generation Rates And Trip Generation Survey (MGA) INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CITY: IRVINE DATE: 9-1-92 NORTH-SOUTH ST: AIRWAY AVENUE DAY: TUESDAY EAST-WEST ST: SUPERPERFORMANCE PARKING LOT PROJ N0: CARS CONING CARS LEAVING CARS IN TIME TO SUPERPERFORMANCE SUPERPERFORMA9CE PARKING LOT ................................................................................................................... . AM 7:30 7:45 0 0 6 8:00 2 0 9 8:15 1 0 12 8:30 2 1 15 ............................................................................................................ TOTAL 5 1 42 8:45 3 0 14 9:00 1 3 14 9:15 1 1 13 9:30 2 0 16 ' ............................................................................................................ TOTAL 7 4 57 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT CDUNT SUMMARY CITY: IRVINE DATE: 9-1-92 gRTH-SOUTH ST: AIRWAY AVENUE DAY: TUESDAY EAST-WEST ST: SUPERPERFORMANCE PARKING LOT PROJ NO: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CARS COMING CARS LEAVING CARS IN TIME TO SUPERPERFORMANCE SUPERPERFORMANCE PARKING LOT --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PM 4:00 15 4:15 0 1 10 4:30 0 1 9 4:45 2 2 7 5:00 0 1 5 ------.. TOTAL 2 5 31 5:15 1 0 6 5:30 2 0 8 5:45 0 2 4 6:00 0 2 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL 3 4 21 3y Y * I �+ INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CITY: IRVINE DATE: 9-2-92 NORTH-SOUTH ST: AIRWAY AVENUE DAY: WEDNESDAY EAST-HEST ST: SUPERPERFORMANCE PARKING LOT PROD NO: _____________________________________________________________________ ________----------------__ ' CARS COMING CARS LEAVING - .--- ----- -� CARS IN 1 TIME TO SUPERPERFORlANCE SUPERPERFORMANCE PARKtNG'LOT ________________•____•____._............................................:..___......................:......._.._..... AN 7:30 3 7:45 0 0 3 8:00 0 0 6 8:15 0 0 11 8:30 0 0 11 ..................................................................................................... ... TOTAL 0 0 31 8:45 1 0 12 9:00 0 1 11 9:15 0 0 11 9:30 2 0 13 TOTAL 3 1 47 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY i IlTY: IRVINE DATE: 9-2-92 1 pRTH-SOUTH ST: AIRWAY AVENUE DAY: WEDNESDAY y EAST-WEST ST: SUPERPERFORMANCE PARKING LOT PROJ NO: } ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ y CARS COMING CARS LEAVING CARS IN TIME TO SUPERPERFORMANCE SUPERPERFORMANCE PARKING LOT --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PM 4:00 9 4:15 1 1 9 4:30 0 0 10 ' 4:45 0 0 10 5:00 0 3 7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL 1 4 36 5:15 1 1 4 5:30 1 1 6 5:45 2 0 5 6:00 0 0 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL 4 2 18 ell . :. TABLE 1: SUPERFORMANCE TRIP GENERATION A.M PEAK HOUR SURVEY DATA A.M A.M A.M 7:30 TO 8:30 8-.30 TO 9:30 AVERAGE PARTICULARS IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT SEPT 1, 1992 5 1 7 4 6 3 (TUESDAY) SEPT 2, 1992 0 0 3 1 2 1 (WEDNESDAY) AVERAGE IN AND OUT TRIP ENDS 4 2 SEVEN BAYS DURING A.M PEAK HOUR TABLE 2: SUPERFORMANCE TRIP GENERATION P.M PEAK HOUR SURVEY DATA P.M P.M • P.M 4:00 TO 5:00 5:00 TO 6:00 AVERAGE PARTICULARS . IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT SEPT 1, 1992 2 5 3 4 3 5 (TUESDAY) SEPT 2, 1992 1 4 4 2 3 3 (WEDNESDAY) AVERAGE IN AND OUT TRIP ENDS 3 4 SEVEN BAYS DURING P.M PEAK HOUR AVERAGE IN AND OUT TRIP RATE PER BAY DURING A.M PEAK HOUR IS 0.57 AND 0.29 RESPECTIVELY. AVERAGE IN AND OUT TRIP RATE PER BAY DURING P.M PEAK HOUR IS 0.43- AND 0.57 RESPECTIVELY. SUPERFORMANCE IS LOCATED ON AIRWAY AVENUE IN COSTA MESA. PRESENTLY IT HAS SEVEN BAYS FOR REPARIRING CARS. SUPERFORMANCE IS A SERVICE AND REPAIR SPECIALISTS. PROPOSED SUPERFORMANCE IN NEWPORT BEACH WILL HAVE 15 BAYS FOR REPAIRING CARS. 1 1 t 1 t 1 APPENDIX "D" One Percent Analysis t and 1 ICU Work Sheets r A 1% Traffic Volume Analysis I„ Intersection JAMBOREE ROAD/MACARTHUR BOULEVARD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average winzer7Spring a2 )Art , Peak 24 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 24 Hour Groxth Peak 24 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 21* Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume 2 Volume volume volume volume Volume Northbound 2631 3'7o s a O Southbound 896 31.— 2-'7 (S t 7 a 9 9 " I b ' Eastbound 3650 m 4 $+4 B19 9 2 a 'Westbound 1800 0Z- s Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected l� Peak 2)1 Hour Traffic-Volume Project Traffic is estimated to .be greater than 1% of Projected El Peak 2-� Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. t , s �i�.L (✓As� M4r ;&PAAr 7'ttC� �,.. GATE PROJECT yy . FORM T : 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE ROAD/MACARTHUR BOULEVARD (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Average In er pang g-• pM Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Nour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volme Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1688 3 7i ' S h i'1. L S 31 i Southbound 2912 3 7, $1 31 S L L $ 5 Eastbound 2215 U'1 3 3S - 3 d) Z O i West 3822 ZZs..4L Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated -to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: 112.1 Z- PROJECT; FORM T r Y J = s 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE ROAD/BIRCH STREET (Existing Traffic Volumes basedon Average winter/Spring 52 AM 5 Peak 24-Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects projected 1. of Projec ted Project i Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peek 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Pnk 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 2656 17,. - a-1 2380 60(. 3 Sad= 0 southbound 3521 17a — 3? R«3 L2 3 C 6]-3 j 0 Eastbound 344 D .23 A 3/ S y S Z 2 westbound 42 t — ;i Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume a Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. Pay^ Tq,Crla7N DATE: I"Z'S _11 '1" PROJECT: I& 1 FORM T 7 I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE ROANBIRCH STREET (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Avtrage Winter/Spring -2 PM Peak 2k Hour, Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Projeet Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 21S Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour. Penk 2u Hour ! Volume Volume Volume Volume -volume Volume ------------ ! is Northbound 2875 ✓�• 7 5 57 ) 0 . ! Southbound 3501 S JIfl4• 4980 5e i ' �'' �! • " Eastbound 1274 O /`j 36 • 3 2o! Westbound 4 4 • I`. F Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected 91 Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected j Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization t (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. .�i s' ( ;il r<. A; DATE y 21 2. `.''.PROJECT: t ,,,,t, FnRM 7 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE BOULEVARD/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 92)AM Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing, Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak Zh Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour h Volume Vol Una ,R Volume Yollene Volume Volume Northbound 2421 Southbound 4207 ¢Z ZZ3 ZZ 74 D eastbound O S Z,2 Westbound Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected , Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected I; Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. t` Y •i Y 6 1 4' • i• n- D n— �' • Y DATE: e•Q ^ 2-41 — f PROJECT: ` t .V III 79:rt FORM T y 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE BOULEVARD/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 92 PM Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Pea2Hour Growth Peak 2 Volume Hour Peak 2hHour Volume Volume Peak uae ur PeaYolume Hour Northbound 3789 f'I. - g $(66 9 3 -70 4' Southbound 3916 (7 g 3 j 6 yZ ) 43 4 Eastbound 1915' 0 q6-7 41 z .29 G Westbound O jZ G L e2 G $O a7 a 1418 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected IX,J Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 23* Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. .r /C.atiPaub t aet�t�fi, DATE• PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BOULEVARD/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on AverageMinter/Spring 92)AM Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing. Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Protect Direction Peak 24 Hour Growth Peek 2h Hour Peak.2h Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 211 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1525 3 7a —+(. 61-7 ¢o Y 9 ♦� southbound 2924 l 3 SS s i Eastbound 2284 O =2 0 41 a 1- Af { O L Westbound 911 O 666 1+4 to C Project Traffic is estimated to 'be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of 'Projected [] Volume. Intersection Capacity Peak Hour Traffic 1 P Y Utilization Pe k 2� (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. WA. :cae. 1YL4 DATE 4,1� PROJECT: i s FORM T �' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BOULEVARD/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Sp I ring 9z )PM Peak 2y Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 2365 ST. r 6X6 5e-11 , 1 I 6 southbound 3581 $9� — a'1' 17*6 5433 ,4 i 6 Eastbound 1699 Y o A SG 9 Westbound 8 p ('/Z 6 ¢$f3 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 21%j Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. . it L n._ 4/44 1' 'Coar 1C.8'1'�a.a�t. � [SL[i�(' DATE- R'z- * PROJEC FnRM T 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR/BIRCH (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Wi n er pr ng 19 9 AM ` Peak 24 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10 of Projected Project Direction Peak 211 Hour Growth Peak Zk Hour Peak 2y Hour Peek 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume , Volume Northbound 1411 �?7,— ¢Z A 3 7-7 Southbound 1927 3 /0— 6a Z 38 x Eastbound 1083 973 M¢$1r l5 LWestbound 606 G 1+0 ?'��' 7 0 }� Project Traffic is estimated� to be less than 1% of Projected �l Peak 2)g Hour Traffic Volume a Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 21S Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. uA-11 /Gfr K.CP�ti —4C;N1 DATE•�'�q— q7. PROJECT: 1 rnpm r 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR/BIRCH (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 92)PM i Peak 2y Hour Approved FAach Existing Hegtonel Projects Projected 1: of ProJeeied Project tion Peak 211 Hour • Growth Peak 2y Hour . Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ound 37, - 5 ! !74` g$« 3G i o bound 2133 3 7 " L4 23 Z 2 bound a S$Jf41197bound 1670 O 6P5 i1.35S �4 6 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Lcq Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour. Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. a 'DATE: 2_ a 6�. PROJECT: "n.. rnoM 7 S� 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/aAMBOREE ROAD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring _ Peak 2+s Hour Approved i ApproachE2� Hour Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project i Direction Growth Peak 2y Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume VolumeNorthbound 7.ySouthboundrj 46 Z its 3 3 1 i li j Eastbound O, l O p _ Westbound `D_ Q 3�SL '$•�•�(, s Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. i' r ' DATE: �— Z'1— R2 "pROJF CT' Jy " ':. MAM I � s • • 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/JAMBOREE ROAD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 92 PM _ Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Protect Direction Peak 231 Hour Growth Peak 21i Hour Peak 2's Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 23, Hour Volume. Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 6716- L9 t Southbound / 49 1'? 6 I b Eastbound D 0 { Westbound o �z i3 a713 ' Z7 ` a Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 23g Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected C] Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 044� /( ,4A.- �.,f.Pa art 'hLe.4 l ,� DATE• 9— 29 — -! 2-- PROJECT: 5' ; FORM T • •S h 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/CAMPUS_ DRIVE r (Existing Traffic Volumesased .on verageWinter/Spring _19 M Peak 2k Hour Approved I Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Projected Project Direction Peak 24 Hour Growth Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2q Hour Peak 2k"Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 3436 (D♦2 ¢�Z t 4-5 F} Southbound 3569 OL qco 55 57 194 Eastbound C D (p O —0— Westbound 6 4 Z`t �D0623 (0 s Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2� Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than, 1% of Projected El Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: FORM 1 r 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/BIRCH STREET (Existing Traffic Volumes base on Average inter pring �AM Peak 24 Hour Approved' Approach Existing Regional Projects , Projected 1. of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2§ Hour Peak 21s Hour Peak 2y Hour Peek 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume • 9 i Northbound 2436a2731 ~� 0 Southbound o ga 13 i 4 Eastbound O D D b i ty I Westbound �{ Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected 115� Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected a Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization r. (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1. C �ti w &-S / f Rig. PA/IIC. rJ"4"C� DATE:• PROJECT: S ,;• Fnp! T r III 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/BIRCH STREET (Existing Traffic Volumes based on verage . In er pring _, PM Peak 24 Nour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 24 Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak Ds Hour Peak 2+ Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume � I Northbound 1192 6 $95 I f$l 6 northbound 6 Eg g�-1 G 36 i $ Eastbound —0— D Q D b O Westbound 4532 97e,0 S2,9Z 83 Z Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 24 Hour Traffic Volume O Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2)1 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ; R C.U.) Analysis is required. �AA— � Jssk / ear ��Pa��t+ '0—cLG� y DATE• PROJECT; ' FAVM T 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL STREET/JAMBOREE ROAD (Existing Traffic Volumes se on Average Winter pring 19 92 ' Peak 2)s Hour Approved i Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2's Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour • Peak Zk Hour Peak 2y Hour Peek 24 Hour Volume volume Volume Volume Yolume ! volume Northbound 5546 D '! 3-7 g i5 f Z Southbound 960 0 1 1463 2623 6 � O Eastbound 5812 / Y.- $S 4011 ?45S S 2 �Westbound /q+a ►O to Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume.. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. C.n—==�cr'L /C:a r irC—>=Pu atr rQi/•tlj. DATE• PROJECT: FnPM T • r 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL STREET/JAMBOREE ROAD (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Average Winter/Spring RLITPm Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak Zk Hour Growth Peak Zh Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume volume Volume Volume Northbound 4645 4q4 5553 54 2 South bound 2215 a �c611 Ott Eastbound 6004 Uot& f¢ I q I I Z Westbound 12 Lift.:: G Z Project Traffic is estimated to be less thaih 1% of Projected ® Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. k "`— 45A w. L�,P4lN. FQti it DATE: PROJECT: t' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis 4 , Intersection ' BRISTOL ST/CAMPUS DR—IRVINE AV (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 9 Y .. Peak 21s Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction PeaVolume Hour Volume Growth PeaVolume Hour PenVolume Hour PeaVolume Hour PeaVolune Hour N Northbound 3987 T �$S + b Southbound 13 62 2.3 •;L 2,Z = Eastbound a o 5� l�1 3 i 4 Westbound 0 4 a Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. i .DATE -�a r'. /(.:�i� �Patn.• ,(".!�.G�t.� PROJECT; FORM T // 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST/CAMPUS DR-IRVINE AV (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average n er pr ng 92 PM Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1; of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Peek 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume w Volume Volume Northbound 3021 Southbound 3039 Eastbound 5769 { Westbound gyp{ Project Traffic is .estimated to be less than 1% of Projected u� Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 24 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 4 ' • i 1 A- . lea A P4iti r�iOt GATE: PROJECT: FnRm 1 /a r . I a x 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST/BIRCH ST (Existing Traffic Volumes basea on verage willLet-15pring 92 AM Peak 2k Hour Approved proach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1� of Projected. Project ircction Peak 211 Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2§ Hour volume volume Volume Volume Volume Volume rthbound 637 O �jr1 2.Z uthbound 620 O 1* _ 7q� ?R a Eastbound 4460 z � westbound Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: a5� nn CAt• 1�- �ROJECT: FnaM r 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST/BIRCH ST (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average n er pr ng _ PM Peak 29 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2$ Hour Growth Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Peek 2§ Hour ; Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume II Volume Northbound 504 G (tCi,. Ag'g$ A+ Southbound 1326 0 5 Z G �' !' r Eastbound O p p(m a «g 7 7 i 4' 663 . Westbound 0 $O f d { G — Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected 0 Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. '. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. /I �- c ---046l� &A_ lLn c palA. T-A-;J DATE: PROJECT: 6 FnPM T y ' 11 aq Mohle,Grover&Associates September 30, 1992 Mr. John Douglas Principal Planner City of Newport Beach Planning Department 330 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658 RE: Revised Traffic Impact Study for an Automobile and Car Wash Facility, Birch Street, City of Newport Beach Dear Mr. Douglas: Enclosed are two copies of the revised traffic impact study for the cited project. The revisions relate to the addition of employees, Trip Generation, and revising the 1% analysis per City guidelines. Also, incorporated are other changes recommended by the City Traffic Engineer. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to work on this project for the City. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Respectfully submitted, MOHLE, GROVER & ASSOCIATES g-j, Na AAw, Dr. N. Murthy Transportation Planner/Project Manager NM/lmw fln:douglasUtr Ench Revised Reports (2) MUNICIPAL AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS 901 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite A, La Habra, CA 90631 (714)738-3471 FAX (714)738-7802 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR ' CAR REPAIR AND ' CAR WASH FACILITY ' IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ' PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ' O QRp FSSIOryq _ < SEPTEMBER 1992 h3����NR M°y��Fyc ' k N . 0692 Exp. 31-92 PREPARED BY s'grF aF'j% o 7RAFF C Nq 0890 DATE mag Mohle, Grover & Associates ' 901 E Imperlal Hwy. Ste. A, La Habra, CA 90631 • (714)738-30 • FAX (714)738-7802 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 ' 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 3. STUDY INTERSECTIONS 1 ' 4. COMMITTED PROJECTS 1 5. REGIONAL GROWTH FACTOR 5 ' 6. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 5 ' 6.1 Trip Generation 5 6.2 Trip Distribution 6 6.3 Trip Assignment 6 7. ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS 12 ' 8. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS 12 ' 9. SITE ACCESS 12 10. SUMMARY 14 LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE ' 1 Study Intersections 2 2 Trip Generation Rates and Project Trip Ends 7 ' 3 Study Intersections One Percent Analysis Summary 13 LIST OF FIGURES FI URE PAGE 1 Location Map 3 2 Site Plan 4 ' 3 Trip Distribution - Project - ' Inbound 8 4 Trip Distribution - Project - Outbound 9 ' 5 Peak Hour Inbound A.M./P.M. Traffic Volumes - Project 10 ' 6 Peak Hour Outbound A.M./P.M. Traffic Volumes - Project 11 APPENDICES APPENDIX ' "A" Committed Projects List ' "B" Regional Growth Factor "C" Trip Generation Rates and Trip Generation Survey ' "D" One Percent Analysis Work Sheets I� 1 1 ' Traffic Impact Study, Newpieach .r Repair and Car Wash ' TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to present the findings of a traffic impact study for the proposed car repair and car wash facility at 3767 Birch Street, in the City of Newport ' Beach. The proposed project consists of 15 bays for repairing cars and approximately a half acre car wash facility. The locations of the project with regional context is shown in Figure 1. ' Presently on-site, there exists an industrial building of 21,000 square feet. This exist- ing facility will be replaced by the proposed project. The specific site plan of the proposed project is shown in Figure 2. the entrance and exist to the project site is through Birch Street as shown in Figure 2. 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS ' The major access roads to the project site are Birch Street, Von Karman Avenue, Campus Drive, Bristol Street, Bristol Street North, and Jamboree Road. The area surrounding the project site is well developed from a traffic point of view. There are ' various land uses such as commercial, offices and restaurants which exist in the vicini- ty of the project and a well developed road network serves the area. A majority of the key intersections are signalized and are provided with exclusive left-turn pockets. 3. STUDY INTERSECTIONS ' Eleven intersections were recommended by the City Traffic Engineer for conducting Level of Service (LOS) analysis per City guidelines during a.m. and p.m. peak peri- ods. The study intersections are listed in Table 1. The study intersections were analyzed for the following traffic scenarios: ' 1) Existing Traffic Volumes 2) Existing Plus Growth Factor Plus Committed Project Volumes 3) Cumulative Traffic Volumes (Includes Proposed Project Traffic) The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method was used for conducting LOS. The LOS was based on criteria of analysis developed by the City of Newport Beach ' Traffic Ordinance and Methodology. 4. COMMITTED PROJECTS ' The City Traffic Engineer provided a list of committed projects and the committed projects cumulative traffic volumes at the study intersections. The committed projects ' are those projects already approved by the City. These committed projects could be in various stages of development or completion. The list of committed projects are given in Appendix "A". ' 1 - Traffic Impact Study, Newp*each Repair and Car Wash TABLE 1 ' STUDY INTERSECTIONS* Study Intersections ' 1. Jamboree Road/Macarthur Boulevard 2. Jamboree Road/Birch Street 3. Jamboree Road/Campus Drive ' 4. MacArthur Boulevard/Campus Drive ' S. MacArthur Boulevard/Birch'Street 6. Bristol Street North/Jamboree Road ' 7. Bristol Street North/Campus Drive ' 8. Bristol Street North/Birch Street ' 9. Bristol Street/Jamboree Road 10. Bristol Street/Campus Drive-Irvine Avenue ' 11. Bristol Street/Birch Street '•As recommended by the City of Newport Beach 1 i t2 1 Traffic Impact Study, Newpooach Repair and Car Wash 1 1 �� MiDy�SON / OR. 1 oQ'. Gs e 73 m 1 y�. 0 e° 4, S a IRNNE 1 e�/sT� g sl sT 1 IRVINE ' NEWPORT BEACH CREEK NNE—L OR. SPN 1 � . 1 • = STUDY INTERSECTIONS NOT TO SCALE � 1 1 man LOCATION MAP FIGURE 1 NPCARWSH 3 1 Traffic Impact Study, Newpoeach OU Repair and Car Wash tz : i dA t rt . 1 i Z —I y .1 1 MCM SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 1 r:p:ras'.5.4 1 - 4 ' MOHLE ,GROVER & RSSOC ID : —738-7802 OCT 01W 14 :33 No .008 P .02 Traffic Impact Study,Newpon BftOh Repair and Car Wash ' S. REGIONAL GROWTH FACTOR ' The City provided growth rate on all major access roads to the project. Appropriate growth rates were applied to obtain existing Pius growth factor traffic volumes. The City supplied growth factor data is given in Appendix "B". The largest growth rate is ' S96 on MacArthur Boulevard between Pacific Coast Highway and Jamboree Road. (, TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ' This study analyzes the traffic impact of the proposed project for the Year 1992 on the existing road network. The following sections deal with Trip Generation, Trip Distri- bution, and Trip Assignment. ' 6.1 Trig aeration The proposed project is to build a car repair and car wash facility on Birch Street. Trip Generation rates for the car repair facility with•15 bays was developed by conducting a Trip Generation Study at an existing facility (7 ' bays) located in Costa Mesa (Superformance, Airway Avenue, Costa Mesa). The details of the Trip Generation Survey and calculations related to trip rates for the car repair facility is given in Appendix "C". ' The Trip Generation rates for the car wash was obtained from San Diego Association of Governments, Trip Generation Data. The proposed car wash facility is approximately a half acre in size. ' The number of employees from both Car Repairs and Car Wash will be 10. Trip Generation Rates for employees was obtained from I.T.E. Trip Genera- tion Handbook, 5th Edition, 1991. The Trip Generation rates for the existing land use (industrial)was provided by the City Traffic Engineer. The Trip Generation rates and Trip ends for t study land uses are given in Table 2. Trip reductions were done for existing land use and pass by trips for car wash facility. The estimated average daily project traffic is as follows: ' rand Use Vehicles Per Dav ' Car Repair (Project 75 Car Wash (Project) 7bta1: 3M ' Reduction (Existing Land Use) -105 Reduction (internal Car Wash Per Day) lbtal; 250 ' The project generates a net estimated 250 trip ends per day with 16(4 in and 12 out) trip ends during a.m. peak periods and 40 (20 in and 20 out) trip ends during p.m..peak periods, respectively. ' Traffic Impact Study, Newpoeach Or Repair and Car Wash 6.2 Trip Distributions The trip distribution of the project generated traffic was done in consultation with the City Traffic Engineer. Taken into consideration were the existing turning movement volumes and anticipated routes by employees and customers ' to the project. Also taken into consideration were the existing network and land uses. The trip distribution to the project site is as shown in Figures 3 and 4. Figure 3 shows the inbound and Figure 4 shows the outbound trip distribu- tion of project generated traffic. 6.3 Traffic Assignment Trips assignment involves determining the estimated number of trip end that will use the road network based on trip generation and trip distribution. The project generated traffic assignment during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours is ' shown in Figures 5 and 6. Figure 5 shows the inbound project traffic assign- ment during the A.M. and the P.M. peak hours. ' 6 Traffic Impact Study, Newpoeach !r Repair and Car Wash ' TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION RATES AND PROJECT TRIP ENDS 11 Trip Generation Rates ' Aff 7P111 Land Use Units Peak Hr. Peak 2.1/2 Hr. Peak Hr. Peak 2.1/2 Hr. ' In Out In Out In Out In Out ' Industrial(1) 1,000SF 0.8 0.2 1.6 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.8 1.4 Car Wash(2) 0.5 Acres 6 6 12 12 14 14 28' 28 Car Repair Bay(3) i 0M 0.29 1.16 0.58 0.43 0.57 0.86 1.14 ' Employees(4) 1 0.46 0.07 0.92 0.14 0.08 0.51 0.16 1.02 Project Trip Ends ' AN .P� Land Use Units Peak Hr. Peak 2-1/2 Hr.* Peak Hr. Peak 2-1/2 Hr. In Out In Out In Out In Out Car Wash 0.5 Acres 6 6 12 12 14 14 28 28 Car Repair Bay 15 9 4 18 8 6 9 12 18 Employees 10 5 1 10 2 1 5 2 10 TOTAL 20 11 40 22 21 28 42 56 Existing Land Use(5) 21 KSF 17 4 34 8 8 15 16 30 TOTAL 3 7 6 14 13 13 26 26 Passer By Trips(6) ....20% 1 1 2 2 3 3 6 6 ' Final Project Trip Ends 2 6 4 12 1010 20 20 Note: (1)-Trip rates provided by City (2)-San Diego Association of Governments ' (3)-Trip rates for Trip Generation Survey,Appendix"C" (4)-Employees for car repair and car wash; I.T.E.Trip Rates,Sth Ed., 1991. (5)-Reduction In trip ends for existing land use ' (6)-Reduction In trip ends for passer-by trips to car wash only(includes repair cars washed on-site) • -Multiplied by 2 7 ' Traffic Impact Study, Newpjoeach Or Repair and Car Wash � 60% ' �! ESL' .u/Q„EtsOro 30%/ t � 10% 30% 30% 1070 % m 1 73 20 f� ' C� 0 10% 5 o N OG9i( rT �Q� IR NE 20 BgiST ST o� 5% eq�ST` sr 15% sr ' 15% IRVINE f NEWPORT ' BEACH CREEK OR. CHANNEL O�E00' SI}15%/� SPN 1 ' • = STUDY INTERSECTIONS NOT TO SCALE TRIP DISTRIBUTION - PROJECT FIGURE 3 Maq ' INBOUND ' NPCARNSH 8 1 Traffic Impact Study, Newpoeach Repair and Car Wash 60% �60% I1' 40% )40% o�• c9�A°s 10% Q�5 30% �o. 1 GPI o� 30% 10% 5% 73 20% 5% 1 0% ems' m 20% 5% 60% S 1 10� 01. N ST cai IRNNE � S��Sl � G,2, Bq,Slo! � Sr 10% 0� ' 10% 20 20 o NEWPORT 15% sT IRVINE ' 5%% BEACH CREEK CHANNEL�- 15 o DR gpN 151 1 • = STUDY INTERSECTIONS NOT TO SCALE 1 MaLl TRIP DISTRIBUTION - PROJECT FIGURE 4 ' OUTBOUND ' NPCARWSH 9 ' Traffic Impact Study, Newpoeach Repair and Car Wash 1/6 P�, �Fisgv )1/4 1/3 P� J� Cq�p 0� G 1/3 0 :5 s o Qo 0/1 0/f e' g 73 m ' of 2 0/0 5~ o �0/0 ' 0/1 0/1 ' P� 0/2 I S a IRNNE B,p�ST T a "/1 e9/slO� sl 1/1 Sl IRVINE NEWPORT 11/1 ' BEACH CREEK DR. CHANNEL LEGEND • = STUDY INTERSECTIONS XX/YY = A.M./P.M. VPH ' NOT TO SCALE 1 PEAK HOUR INBOUND A.M/P.M. FIGURE 5 ' mriq TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROJECT ' NPCARWSH 10 1 Traffic Impact Study, Newport A Caepair and Car Wash 1 � M/Cyf�SON 2/4 °R 1 2/3 P� s Q�y 2/3 1 0 2 �1/1 0� 1/2 73 9, 1/ 1/2 1 /1 5~' m 6� 1/2 0/0 g 1 0/0 1 0/1 s � 1 NNE P� /1 �QPisl T � 1/1 sr 1 0/1 1/ 1 0/0 IRVINE � 2 NEWPORT 0 0 0/1 1/ G�7BEACH CREEK CHANNEL R LEGEND 1 • = STUDY INTERSECTIONS XX/YY = A.M./P.M. VPH 1 � NOT TO SCALE NOTE: LEFT TURNS OUTBOUND FROM DRIVEHAY BETWEEN 3 TO 6 P.M. IS PROHIBITED 1 1 PEAK HOUR OUTBOUND A.M/P.M. FIGURE 6 M041 TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROJECT 1 NPCARWSH ),1 Traffic Impact Study, Newpoeach or Repair and Car Wash 7. ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS In conducting one percent analysis per the City of Newport Beach guidelines, one percent of the 2 1/2 hour A.M. and P.M. peak hour traffic volumes are utilized to determine if the project's corresponding 2 1/2 hour peak hour traffic volume exceeds or is less than the above volume for all approaches at the study intersections. In case the project volume "DOES NOT EXCEED" the one percent of the existing plus regional growth factor plus committed project volume, no ICU analysis is con- ducted for that particular peak hour for the intersection. On the other hand, if the project traffic volume "fails" the one percent test, that is the project volume exceeds one percent of the existing volume plus regional growth factor volume plus committed project volume, and ICU analysis is performed. Table 3 shows the summary of one percent analysis. 8. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' All study intersections satisfy the 1% analysis criteria. Therefore, per City guidelines no ICU Analysis is required. ' 9. SITE ACCESS ' Site access is through Birch Street. It is recommended that proper directional pave- ment markings for left and right turning vehicles be provided at the driveways. Due to the observed backing up of southbound right turns and the proximity of the project driveway to the intersection of Bristol Street and Birch Street, all outbound left-turn (northbound) from the driveway are recommended to be prohibited between 3 to 6 p.m. on peak periods. ' It is required to install adequate traffic control devices at the driveway to prohibit northbound left-turns during p.m. peak periods. 1 ' 12 Traffic Impact Study, Newpokeach Oar Repair and Car Wash TABLE 3 ' STUDY INTERSECTIONS ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY I Do the Intersections Satisfy One Percent Study Intersections Analysis? AM., ' 1. Jamboree Road/Macarthur Boulevard Yes Yes 2. Jamboree Road/Birch Street Yes Yes ' 3. Jamboree Road/Campus Drive Yes Yes ' 4. MacArthur Boulevard/Campus Drive Yes Yes ' 5. MacArthur Boulevard/Birch Street Yes Yes 6. Bristol Street North/Jamboree Road Yes Yes ' 7. Bristol Street North/Campus Drive Yes Yes 1 8. Bristol Street North/Birch Street Yes Yes 9. Bristol Street/Jamboree Road Yes Yes 10. Bristol Street/Campus Drive-Irvine Avenue Yes Yes 11. Bristol Street/Birch Street Yes Yes 13 'MOHLE ,GROVER & ASSOC ID :7 -738-7802 OCT 014 14 :34 NO .UU6 N .uo Traf o Impatud ot Sy, J I soh Repair and Car Wash ' 10. SUMMARY • The project generates a net estimated 250 trip ends per day,with 16 and 40 trip ends during a.m. and p.m. peak periods. The above trip ends include trip end reductions due to existing land use and pass by ' (20%) trips due to car wash. ■ The car repair (bays) trip rates for a.m, and p.m. peak period was ob- tained by conducting a trip generation survey. ' r A total of eleven intersections were analyzed for LOS. ' ■ All intersections satisfy the I% analysis and do not need ICU analysis per City guidelines. • Considering the backing of (southbound right-turn) traffic ' during p.m. peak period at the intersection of Bristol Street and Birch Street and the proximity of the project driveway to this Intersection, all outbound left turns (northbound) are recommended to be prohibited ' between 3 and 6 p.m. peak period. • It is required to install adequate traffic control and pavement markings ' (directional) per City guidelines at the driveways. 0 The project traffic does not have any significant impact on the study intersections. t 1 M:neupart.rpt ' 14 1 1 ' APPENDICES 1 1 1 i APPENDIX "A" Committed Projects List II TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE �EPORT ON APPROVED PRCJECT aUMES • ROJ-NER ALL PROJECTS ON FILE: APPROVED VCLUME IS WEIGHTED 8Y : � 0C1 HUGHES AIRCRAFT a1 1CvX OCCUPANCY CC2 SUNSETTED OCCUPANCY ' 0G3 FAR WEST SAVINGS AND LOAN 103X OCCUPANCY 01.4 SUPEERSEJED 3002 UCCI.PANCY 305 AERONUTRCNIC FORD 103X OCCUP4NCY ' 0Cb SACK BAY CFFICE 10UX OCCUPANCY 0.37 30YLE ENGINEERING 1COX OCCUPANCY v"03 CAL CANADIAN BANK 100X OCCUPANCY t009 CIVIC PLAZA 3891 OCCUPANCY 11C CORPORATE PLAZA 03'=X OCCUPANCY 01i KJLL CENTER NEEWPORT 2 OCCUPANCY 10UX OCCUPANCY :312 MACARTHUR COUNT ' 113 SUPERSEDED CC39 OCCUPANCY 014 SUPERSEDED 0007 OCCUPANCY 015 ORCHARD OFFICE 1C,?X OCCUPANCY ' 016 PACIFIC MUTUAL PLAZA 1 '0A OCCUPANCY 017 3701 BIRCH OFFICE 1Pu% OCCUPANCY 018 NEwPORT PLACE 3912 OCCUPANCY 019 SUNSETTED ^0%Y, OCCUPANCY }2, 4-ANK OF NEMPCRT OCCUPANCY C21 :AYSICE S.U.;gE 1G3X CCCJPANCY J22 SE % iSLNNC 1 : : % OCCUPANCY ' �23 SAYW00D AFARTMENTS 1C 7 'OCCUPANCY 324 HAR'�OR POINT HOMES 1C?X OCCUPANCY C25 RCGER' S GARDENS 1vu/. OCCUPANCY U26 SEAVIE'W LUTHERAN PLAZA 1;:u% JCCu0ANCY 027 RUDY BARCN 1C0X OCCUPANCY 028 GLAIL e:USINESS CENTER 1C•3 % CCCJPANCY C29 441 NEePCRT BLVD- ltii'% CCCJFANCY ' 03.3 MARTHA 'S VINEYARD 1 _ OCCUPANCY ;31 VALDEZ jO�% OCCUPANCY 031, COAST 9USINESS CENTER 103 % OCCUPANCY ' 433 KOLL CENTER NPT NO . 1 TPP 0CU"/. OCCUPANCY C34 SEE PROJECTS 340 TC 343 .i_�,X OCCUPANCY 035 ROSE MOLLARD 11X CCCUPANCY ' 036 SUNSETTED i:% OCCUPANCY 039 HUGHES AIRCRAFT aZ 1 ^J7. OCCUPANCY 04.1 3UPERCEDED 16- X OCCUPANCY 341 FLAGS.41F HCSPITAL 1Ca% OCCUPANCY ' 42 PIG CANYON 1v :e2y7 OCCUPANCY OCCUP=NCY :43 FLY ZANY X 044 MARRICTT HCTEL 1i•uX OCCUPANCY ' i45 ST. ANDRE'eS CHURCH 1 .u2 OCCUPANCY 046 YMCA ICCuFANCY C47 ALLRED CONDOS 1"JX OCCUPANCY ' 114g MCRGAN DEVELOPMENT 11: 3X OCCUPANCY •;49 FOUR SEASONS HOTEL 1 ':3X OCCUPANCY G5C UNIV ATH CLUtr TPP 4 EMKAY 1C % OCCUPANCY 31;1 ?LOCK 4-C. MEDICAL 1 :uX OCCUPANCY 333 SEE PRCJECTS .53C TO 533 3 _,X CCCJPANCY TRAFFIC DHASING ORDINANCE REPORT ON APPROVED PROJECT VOLUMES 054 AMEND NO 1 MCARTHUR CCURT 052% OCCUPANCY ' )56 AMENDMENT NC 2 FORD AERC 1002 CCCUPANCY )57 CARVER GRANVILLE OFFICE 10J2 OCCUPANCY 058 CORONA DEL MAR HOPES 1003 OCCUPANCY ' 059 dIG CANYON VILLA APTS. gCGA CCCuF.4NCY 060 14C^ DOVE' STREET 0537. OCCUPANCY 061 11CC QUAIL STREET C0C% OCCUPANCY J62 SUPERSEDED 0007. OCCUPANCY ' J03 KOLL CENTER TPP AMEND . 4A 0002 OCCUPANCY C64 SUNSETTED 0G01. OCCUPANCY O65 ROSAN' S DEVELOPMENT ;,952 CCCUFANCY ' )66 BLOCK 50C NPT CTR PROJ 1 C 0 A OCCUPANCY 068 NE'NPORT AlUATICS CENTER )457 OCCUPANCY 069 2600 E COAST AWY 1 ;/. OCCUPANCY 071) JASMINE PARK 1C0; 2 OCCUPANCY 071 SUNSETTED 'Jt;02 OCCUPANCY 772 NEkPORTER INN EXPANSION 1007 OCCJPANCY 73 SUNSETTED A32 OCCUPANCY 074 SUNSdTTED 00:1; OCCUPANCY 075 FASdICN IS RENAISSANCE 1 '_0 OCCUPANCY 075 SUNSETTED :':IQ" X OCCUP4NICY 077 CDM SENIOR PROJECT 10J % OCCUPANCY 978 POINT C:L MAR 1CQI OCCUPANCY '.79 PACIFIC CLLE i U2 OCCUPANCY .731E SUNSETTED 7Cu% OCCUPANCY )81 NEtPCRT SEACREST APT 1CU/. OCCUPANCY Od3 38G2 CAMPUS DR( M—STORAGE) )732 OCCUPANCY CE4 HCAG CANCER CENTER 009 OCCUPANCY 0;5 EDwARDS NENPORT CENTER 0—j.,%. CCCUPANCY u8b SEASIDE APTS ( i^ESA II) 1C: 2 OCCUPANCY 367 VICTORIA STATION (OFFICE ) 1CO2 OCCUPANCY 488 376U CAMPUS DP (M—STORAGE) 1000 OCCUPANCY Gd9 VcnPORT IPPCRTS 1rs;j % OCCUPANCY ;4C SUPERSEDED -0O2 OCCUPANCY 392 MARINERS ' MIL° ,MARINE CTR i )+'.X OCCUPANCY 393 15Ta STREET ADARTMENTS 1r:'L2 OCCUPANCY u 9 4 SEASIC_ APARTMENTS III 113U2 OCCUP ;NCY .95 NPT PAY RETIREMEAT INN ucj% OCCUPANCY u96 NEADORT CLASSIC INN ,G:'/, OCCUPANCY G97 MA?INERS CHURCH =XPANSION i0 „4 OCCUPANCY C98 MCLAChLAN—NEWPORT PL JC4 OCCUPANCY 0ti9 151. 1 SUDERICR ,MEDICAL iC•11 OCCUPANCY III FASHICN ISLANO 1;2 GC_ 2 OCCUPANCY 1C1 NE'APORTER RESORT EXPAND . OCCUPANCY ' 1C2 SUNSETTED G021 CCCUPANCY 103 NEePORT LIDC MED CENTER :90.% OCCUPANCY 1 ':4 VILLA DOINT UC,17 OCCUPANCY 105 SHOKtLAN 2 OCCUPANCY 15Tri ST A F T S uS 7 OCCUPANCY 107 ROC&WELL EXPANSION :C0% OCCUPANCY IL' s ANDRE116 RESTAURANT V10 OCCUPANCY ' 109 3AL :OA / MASHINGTONv01.2 OCCUPANCY 111) NE'wPORT IMPORTS REST . GOCX OCCUPANCY TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINA4CE ,REPORT ON APPRCVED PROJECT VOLUMES 111 2ETH ST MARINA PROJECT J1%j2 OCCUPANCY ' 112 APaROSIA RESTAUR411IT ZC''JY. OCCUPANCY 113 CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION 1JC2 OCCUPANCY 114 OUR LADY GUEEN OF ANGELS 10-33 OCCUPANCY ' 115 ZONTA CLUE RESIDENTIAL J7:'s7 OCCUPANCY 115 28T4 STREET ISLAND 040, 2 OCCUPANCY 117 VILLA POINT II u8 X OCCUPANCY 118 TACO SELL (FAST FOOD) 1':OX CCCUPANCY 119 FASHION ISLAND TRANSFER 00 Y OCCUPANCY 120 PACIFIC E:LL SITE 0C-J2 OCCUPANCY 121 NE'WPORT VILLAGE u^o2 CCCUPANCY ' 122 CASTAWAYS MARINA 0.J2 OCCUPANCY 123 KOLL CENTER CARL' S JR 72 OCCUPANCY 124 CIVIC ^PLAZA 0C-,',7 OCCUPANCY ' 125 CORPORATE PLAZA +S NEST 13%7 OCCUPANCY 127 BURGESS COMMERCIAL CENTER 0 2 OCCUPANCY 128 HAR805 PACIFIC PLAZA OCC% OCCUFANCY ' 129 HOAG HOSPITAL EXTENSION 301-2 OCCUPANCY 340 4A:NDM=NT NO . 1 FORD AERO 1ti32 OCCUPANCY 341 AMENDMENT NC. i FORD AERO uC*01 OCCUPANCY 34Z AiMENDN :NT NC. 1 FCPD AERO 30.)9 OCCUPANCY ' 343 AM=NOMENT NO. i FORD AIR 30u2 OCCUPANCY 530 AMENOMcNT NO 1 NORTH FORD 1G.;;: OCCUPANCY 531 AM9-N0MENT NC 1 NORTH FORD 1 ^. -1 OCCUPANCY ' 532 AMENOMENT NO 1 NORTH FORD 1-�Q, 2 OCCUPANCY 533 AMENDMENT NO 1 NORTH FORD Gt"% OCCUPANCY 535 IRVINEE PROJECT J0CZ OCCUPANCY ' 913 NE'WPORT DUNES 3C•I)Z OCCUPANCY 92•) ° AYVI zW C ,Q3 OCCUPANCY P30 CITY CF IRVINE DEV . C'' 2 OCCUPANCY 1 ' APPENDIX "B" ' Regional Growth Factor CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANNUAL GROWTH RATE COAST HIGHWAY ' East city limit to MacArthur Boulevard 2% MacArthur Boulevard to Jamboree Road 2% ' Jamboree Road to Newport Boulevard 2% Newport Boulevard to west city limit 4% IRVINE AVENUE All 2.5% t JAMBOREE ROAD Coast Highway to San Joaquin Hills Road 3% San Joaquin Hills Road to Bison 2% Bison to Bristol 1% ' Bristol to Campus 1% MACARTHUR BOULEVARD 1 Coast Highway to San Joaquin Hills Road 6% San Joaquin Hills Road to north city limit 3% NEWPORT BOULEVARD ' Coast Highway to north city limit 1% ' Street segments not listed are assumed to have 0% regional growth. 1 � � 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 i 1 I 1 1 I 1 APPENDIX "C" Trip Generation Rates And Trip Generation Survey (MGA) ' INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CITY: IRVINE DATE: 9-1-92 ' NORTH-SOUTH ST: AIRWAY AVENUE DAY: TUESDAY EAST-WEST ST: SUPERPERFORMANCE PARKING LOT PROJ NO: _________________________________________________________________________________ -. CARS COMING CARS LEAVING CARS IN --- TIME------. TO SUPERPERFORMANCE------------------ SUPERPERFORMANCE--.-------------.-_-PARKING-LOT AM 7:30 6 7:45 0 0 6 8:00 2 0 9 t8:15 1 0 12 8:30 2 1 15 --------------------------------------------------------.-------_---------__ _-----.---------- ' TOTAL 5 1 42 ' 8:45 3 0 14 9:00 1 3 14 ' 9:15 1 1 13 9:30 2 0 16 t ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - TOTAL 7 4 57 1 1 i INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CITY: IRVINE DATE: 9-1-92 NORTH-SOUTH ST: AIRWAY AVENUE DAY: TUESDAY EAST-WEST ST: SUPERPERFORNANCE PARKING LOT PROJ NO: ---------------------------------------------__-------------.__.._____---_--__---- CARS COMING CARS LEAVING CARS IN TIME -------TO SUPERPERFORMANCE-------------------SUPERPERFORMANCE-..--------..-------PARKING LOT PM 4:00 is ' 4:15 0 1 10 4:30 0 1 9 t4:45 2 2 7 5:00 0 1 5 ............................................................................. ' TOTAL 2 5 31 5.15 1 0 6 5:30 2 0 0 ' 5:45 0 2 4 6:00 0 2 3 TOTAL 3 4 21 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CITY: IRVINE DATE: 9-2-92 NORTH-SOUTH ST: AIRWAY AVENUE DAY: WEDNESDAY EAST-WEST ST: SUPERPERFORMANCE PARKING LOT PROJ NO: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CARS COMING CARS LEAVING CARS IN TIME--- _------- --TO SUPERPERFORMANCE-------------------SUPERPERFORMANCE__------------_---- PARKING- AM 7:30 LOT 3 7:45 0 0 3 8:00 0 0 6 ' 8:15 0 0 11 8,30 0 0 11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL 0 0 31 ' 8:45 1 0 12 9:00 0 1 11 ' 9:15 0 0 11 9:30 2 0 13 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ TOTAL 3 1 47 t ' 1 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CITY: IRVINE DATE: 9-2-92 ' NORTH-SOUTH ST: AIRWAY AVENUE DAY: WEDNESDAY EAST-WEST ST: SUPERPERFORMANCE PARKING LOT PROJ NO: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ CARS COMING CARS LEAVING CARS IN TIME TO SUPERPERFORMANCE SUPERPERFORMANCE PARKING LOT _PM_--- _4:00__----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9-----.._....------- 4:15 1 1 9 4:30 0 0 10 ' 4:45 0 0 10 5:00 0 3 7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ' TOTAL 1 4 36 ' 5:15 1 1 4 5:30 1 1 6 5:45 2 0 5 6:00 0 0 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL 4 2 18 1 TABLE 1: SUPERFORMANCE TRIP GENERATION A.M PEAK HOUR SURVEY DATA A.M A.M A.M 7:30 TO 8:30 8:30 TO 9:30 AVERAGE PARTICULARS IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT SEPT 1, 1992 5 1 7 4 6 3 (TUESDAY) SEPT 2, 1992 0 0 3 1 2 1 (WEDNESDAY) AVERAGE IN AND OUT TRIP ENDS 4 2 SEVEN BAYS DURING A.M PEAK HOUR TABLE 2 : SUPERFORMANCE TRIP GENERATION P.M PEAK HOUR SURVEY DATA P.M P.M P.M 4:00 TO 5:00 5: 00 TO 6:00 AVERAGE PARTICULARS IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT SEPT 1, 1992 2 5 3 4 3 5 (TUESDAY) SEPT 2, 1992 1 4 4 2 3 3 (WEDNESDAY) AVERAGE IN AND OUT TRIP ENDS 3 4 SEVEN BAYS DURING P.M PEAK HOUR AVERAGE IN AND OUT TRIP RATE PER BAY DURING A.M PEAK HOUR IS 0.57 AND 0.29 RESPECTIVELY. AVERAGE IN AND OUT TRIP RATE PER BAY DURING P.M PEAK HOUR IS 0.43 AND 0.57 RESPECTIVELY. SUPERFORMANCE IS LOCATED ON AIRWAY AVENUE IN COSTA MESA. -PRESENTLY IT HAS SEVEN BAYS FOR REPARIRING CARS. SUPERFORMANCE IS A SERVICE AND REPAIR SPECIALISTS. PROPOSED SUPERFORMANCE IN NEWPORT BEACH WILL HAVE 15 BAYS FOR REPAIRING CARS. i 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX "D'1 One Percent Analysis 1 and ICU Work Sheets L1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE ROAD/MACARTHUR BOULEVARD (Existing Traffic Vol'um-e—s-5—as-ecTon Average Winter/Spring 19 92 )AM ' Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2>s Hcur !; Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume I Northbound 2631 �70 - -7�( /2fi 5 3qq 5 a p t ' Southbound 896 3 7,— 2'7 1 �;rl a 4'¢n I a Eastbound 3650 b �b44 �1R 9 gZ i D ' I Westbound 1800 O 13g 5 3/8 3 2 I , Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected 12SJ Peak 22 Hour Traffic-Volume ' D Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1�4A_. W A-sL Or 2tP"I.i, :F; e1 7' DATE. 9 ' zsf I Zq _-- ' PROJECT: crjwa s eti� FORM T r r 1% Traffic Volume Analysis M Intersection JAMBOREE ROAD/MACARTHUR BOULEVARD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average winter/Spring 19 92 PM Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2)1 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 22 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 1688 7i rJ �7 Z L $ 3 7 ! D ' South bound 2912 3 7. g 7 Eastbound 2215 s !6 9 3 3s• g 3 g Westbound ZZZ'� `D 4- ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume r ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 1 1 1 1 i DATE: �f Zg�'� Z. ' PROJECT: < FORM T 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE ROAD/BIRCH STREET (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Average inter pring 9 92 )AM ' Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2�, Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2+s Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h, Hour ' Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Volume Northbound 2656 /7r, ' .�7 I �j$D 15,043 $ad3 ; Q ' Southbound 3921 !7, — 39 P"43 623 L6Z3 i d Eastbound 344 e�3 3 1579 i 2 Westbound 42 ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume ' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2Z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. (_ai. �,.�ca5� f�te. AAi� �Gt,Cvle�f DATE: ' PROJECT: FARM T 1 1 • 1% Traffic Volume Analysis 1 Intersection JAMBOREE ROAD/BIRCH STREET (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average winter/Spring 19 92 )PM 1 Peak 2-� Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour i 1 Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume t: Northbound 2875 x9 ?sll 5715 57 O 1 Southbound 3501 *1 PO SO Eastbound 1274 O I (q36 32.10 371 4 i' 1 Nestbound 44 D ?6 12.0 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume 1 ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ' (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. i � 1 1 1 1 1 ( W-b t ICar 2='P�+�^• to t ! DATE• `7 g fi-, 9 2- 1 PROJECT: FnRM T 1% Traffic Volume Analysis 1 Intersection JAMBOREE BOULEVARD/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average winter/Spring 19 92)AM tPeak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour 1 Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 2421 1 Sorthbound i, 420� - 4Z 3zz3 ¢ ?z 74 i o Eastbound 29 t 3 i O 1 westbound p �eo � zf/S 2.9 d 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 1 M 1 1 1 . 1 i �7/f [.��- �rf.5 � / lC.i=P4ati t/ ac, Oy DATE: 1 PROJECT: FORM 7 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection JAMBOREE BOULEVARD/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average winter/Spring 19 92)PM Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 3789 re1� 3f5 3 (64 617q3 ^70 ' Southbound 3916 (y, 9 '2 3/6 yz 1 43 ¢ Eastbound 1915 0 9('� 2 8 g Z 129 D Westbound 1418 O 1%6 'z- ;Z G to °� a ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PAit, t`ctCtlAsfN DATE: PROJECT: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis tIntersection MACARTHUR BOULEVARD/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 9 92)AM ' Peak 211 Hour Approved ' Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1� of Projected Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2;1 Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume I Volume Northbound 1525 ?� 9, — 4 t'y 4- ' Southbound 2924 307,—$$ ld 3 Eastbound 2284 O Westbound 911 p $S 5 14 6 f ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' a Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization t (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. ' DATE: �aa WaS� / / a.tr LC.cPal� 7 ac.�tY ' PROJECT: FnRM 7 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection MACARTHUR BOULEVARD/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 g2 )PM ' Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 15 of Projected Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 2365 35 5e"11 ' southhound 3581 D"1 1 -1*6 5433 Eastbound 1699 o Y-7 o �„ sc y o ' westbound 2817 ¢g+3 ¢5 O Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. k ,1,C4 lea, ► EPOW t,. 1rCr— -[!�(7 DATE: PROJECT: ' FnRM T 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection MACARTHUR/BIRCH (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 92)AM Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1 of Projected Project Direction Peak 2+1 Hour Growth Peak 2), Hour Peak 2� Hour Peek 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume volume Volume Volume Northbound 1411 '1�'f,— Q Z. 3 717 3 V 30 3 g i D ' Southbound 1927 3%- 69 87- 3 i ,Z Eastbound 1083 a 373 14-61- !S Westbound 606 0 14"0 1#4 -7 ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. t &—pat ¢"gCtlt y DATE PROJECT: MOM T 1 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis 1 Intersection MACARTHUR/BIRCH (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 92 )PM 1 --Peal2k our Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1.716 37a t'7n16 35« 36 ! o 1 Southbound 2133 — (o 2 3-L 44Z ' 6 Eastbound 1197 1 I Westbound 1670 G 6 >r•5 �35$ ;19- 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume ' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 1 . . 1 1 1 i it PaatIt1' DATE: ' PROJECT: MDM T ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/JAMBOREE ROAD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 9 _)AM ' Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project ' Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 211 Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 8370 O Zy 1 1R ' /it Z southbound IRIQp ez 2 5 6 33 i Eastbound !p !O O ' Westbound v 34 5 to g*$G 3 $ Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2-2 Hour Traffic Volume ' Q Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ' (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. ' ' qti WQSh tPa�n. 4 Qc1'{!r DATE: 21- 2. PROJECT: FORM T 1 0 1 . 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/JAMBOREE ROAD 1 (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 92)PM Peak 2s1 Hour Approved 1 Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2's Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume 1 Northbound 2- 6716 a sz 8�45 �7 Southbound 4126 $ 1 6 L Z 7 6 -7 m 1 Eastbound _ _ 0 8 f p i Westbound O 2Z 13 a71$ Z? 1 -- 1 pl Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected 14� Peak 2Z Hour Traffic Volume 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected a Peak 2= Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4)4.6� /L 4�-- fC L` �4t� '�Q.Cc LIS DATE. 9— 29 PROJECT: I FORM T i 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes ase .on Average Inter prtng 9 _ PM i ' Peak 2$ Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Protected 1� of Projected Protect Direction Peak 1k Hour Growth Peak 21, Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 3436 b (04-'4LL 4#17 r 4-5 � B ' Southbound 3569 0 ,� !J`J S I 5L I 0 Eastbound 0 ( p ( D O e Westbound 6 2 5 D 4 Z(a t 623 l 0 5 ' 7' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' Q Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ' (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 7--pwe,, DATE: ^Z1'1��7 2� PROJECT: FORM 7 ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/BIRCH STREET ' (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 992_)AM Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project i Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2;s Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume I I ' Northbound 2436 Southbound 13 711 p Sg a 13 a 1 Q- tEastbound O D O 6 i b I 2519 Westbound 0 8 2.4/ 5 Y 6 i ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ' (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. zIT- ITZ /2,CP4,Mt. 27 �Qc� DATE: t — PROJECT: FnPM T ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/BIRCH STREET ' (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average . Winter/Spring 19 9Z_)PM Peak 22 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project i Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 22 Hour Peak 22 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume � I Northbound 1192 $5 $ 6 ' r uthboundo 2937 63` 35 '76stbund Q_ 0 stou 4532 08Z 3b6 i Lb 4g' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ' ® Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ' (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. _ cAtA Z(�aS� C.ar DATE: L_'2�_ ('7 2 ' PROJECT: Fnpm r ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL STREET/JAMBOREE ROAD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 9 g2)AM ' Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 5546 D q3-7 c¢83 65 2 ' Southbound 960 l663 26-z3 a6 ° ' Eastbound 5812 �� . 5a c$9 7 t 55 Westbound Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Usi Peak 21, Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 1 .� s Liar /(—c'sPGuatr ra 0-i /st44 DATE: Z— ' PROJECT: Ff1PM T 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection BRISTOL STREET/JAMBOREE ROAD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 9 92 ) PM ' Peak 2y Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 211 Hour Peak 21, Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 4645 p q¢ 55�t3 5` 2 ' Southbound 2215 a �ZG67 ¢g�'E' ¢ • Q I Z Eastbound 6004 /��" 6 13g27 f r ' Westbound 12 ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. w G✓�5� /tltti !c—� Pklit. �Qcilt� DATE: jq— 0245 4fZ ' PROJECT: Mom r I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ! Intersection BRISTOL ST/CAMPUS DR—IRVINE AV (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1992 AM 1 ` Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2), Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour ! Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 3987 a I 4 ! Southbound 1119 17 3 2$ Eastbound 8 1 — — Westbound 0 i 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume 1 ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 1 . 1 1 1 DATE: q, 1 PROJECT: F()RM T 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis 1 Intersection BRISTOL ST/CAMPLTS DR—IRVINE AV (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average winter/Spring 1992 )PM ' 1 Peak 2>, Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project 1 Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2§ Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume A � Northbound 3021 D I ¢ ,� 4-50 $ '4 6 � Southbound 3039 O I 6! ✓r' S57 $4 Z Eastbound 5769 6 i ('1'1 y 7566 76 z 1 Westbound —0— 0 gJ to O ! G 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization 1 (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 1 1 1 . 1 - . 1 Lit A- 09L4ZLt_ F=�=—Joe 4 GCeGtt b� DATE: �f^2g� CI Z► 1 PROJECT: FnRM T 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST/BIRCH ST (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 92 )AM Peak 231 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2y Hour , Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume I Northbound 637 55 2 2- Q` Z a outhbound 620 p $ZI + 14" Eastbound Q 3¢OZ 1Q'/iZ ?� i 6 ; 4460 1 Westbound MO— Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ' (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE. 2- ' PROJECT: Mom r 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BRISTOL ST/BIRCH ST (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1992 PM Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Protected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour ' Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound i 504 0 ($0if 4' i Southbound 1326 0 1 570 4 Eastbound 3663 ¢004P 2L69 7? i 4" i Westbound _ _ 0 SO Sy b ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2, Hour Traffic Volume ' a Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. �C�alA. FLei llf i DATE: l— ' PROJECT: FnRM T 12 June 1992 C NVRONUUv11C NTALL, SUE ASSESSMENT FOR TRANSCHEM FACUTY AT A PHASE I I INVESTIGATION PERTAINING TO TENANT PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS PERFORMED FOR THE DONOHUE COMPANY 2698 WHITE ROAD, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA AND THE HOGAN ESTATE BY u III I INSPECTIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS P 0 Box 26047; SANTA ANA CA 92799-6047 (714) 979-9529 IN COOPERATION WITH GEO-ETKA, INC. 739 N. MAIN STREET ORANGE CA 92668 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1, INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1-1 1.1 The Building 1A 1.2 Production Operations and Wastes 1-1 1.3 Initial Survey 1-2 1.4 Potential offsite Contamination 1-3 1.5 Limitations of Study 1-3 2, SUMMARY 2-1 2.1 Risk Assessment 2-1 2.2 Soil Sampling and Testing �' 2-2 2.3 Results, Conclusions and Recommendations 2-2 3, SOIL SAMPLING: STRATEGY AND PROCEDURES 3-1 3-1 3.1 Site Inspection 3-2 3.2 Sampling Strategy -3 3.3 Sampling Procedures 3 3-1 4, CHEMICAL TESTING 4-1 4.1 Chemical Testing Strategy 4-1 4.2 Test Results 5-1 5, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS i APPENDICES: A. LIMITED SUBSURFACE SOIL SAMPLING AND A-1 ANALYTICAL DATA INTERPRETATION B. CHANGE OF CUSTODY FORMS FOR SAMPLES C 1 C. SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS D-1 D. �. SOIL SAMPLING LOG (TABLE) E. CHEMICAL TESTS: LABORATORY RESULTS E-1 F. PHOTOGRAPHS OF SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS F-1 [PHOTOGRAPHS IN SEPARATE BOOKLET] G. AREA MAPS, PLOT PLANS G-1 H. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DISCLOSURE I-1 I. TRANSCHEM PRODUCT BROCHURE J. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT d-1 K SELF-MONITORING WASTEWATER ANALYSIS K-1 REPORTS, 1992 L MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET FOR CLEANING L-1 SOLVENT USED BY TRANSCHEM I I o I I I I Inspections and Investigattons Dih'TSn,1992 P 0 Box 26047 Santa Ana CA69.6047 (714)979.9529 , 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND This commercial property is located in a light industrial development of Newport Beach close to Orange County (John Wayne) Airport, about 200 yards from the major intersection of Bristol Street (and the parallel 73 (Corona del Mar) Freeway) and Campus Drive. Please refer to maps and plot plans (Appendices C and G) of the site. The terrain is generally flat mesa, and drainage along the surface is governed principally by the graded slope of parking areas and landscaped earth. Groundwater is located approximately thirty to forty feet below the surface in this general area, and is believed to flow northwest. There is a thin strip of one to two feet of exposed dirt to the rear of the property and along the south side of the parking lot. This investigation is conducted to evaluate any potential liability of tenant Transchem for contaminating the land on this site, for the purpose of proposed purchase of the land from the present owner, The Irvine Company. The study will therefore focus on locations where wastes may have leaked, seeped or otherwise discharged to the soil underneath. 1.1 The Building The building is a flat-roofed, concrete slab, 22,000 square foot, single-story commercial structure that has been equipped for printed circuit board manufacture. Figure C-1 is a plan view of the building and the lot, indicating by code letters certain production activity areas. These are: P - Photo lab S - Silk screening area F - Fiber Optic extrusion area (separate subtenant production area) AB - Acid Bath area EP - Electroplating area E - Etching area O - "Observation/Inspection area St - Storage area (outside, curbed, fenced and covered) R - Rinse area CI - Clarifier, inside fence BC - '-,Clarifier, outside fence Parking areas south of the building are asphalt paved. There is an outside storage area to the rear of the parking lot, concrete paved, curbed and fenced. The actual storage area is indicated in Figure C-1 by code 'St'. Within this general area is another area separately curbed, for 'Pac Press' and rinse operations. 1.2 Production Operations and Wastes: Transchem, Division of Jetronics Industries, Inc. has leased this 22,000 square foot facility for production of multilayer and double-sided printed circuit boards - precision work for the military, aerospace and computer industries. Appendix I is a copy of the TransChem product brochure. Principal production operations have included: board preparation (drilling and deburring) electroless copper plating (after cleaning), silk screening or photolithography, pattern plating, and etching further electroplating and etching ' 1 - 1 i I I I I Inspections and Investigations,) P 0 Box 26047 Santa Ana CA 9*6047 (714)979.9529 6. Elbows in the wastewater drain line approximately eighteen inches below the floor are located below each one of the floor drains. These elbows are a most likely place for leakage from the line, and hence for contamination of the soil. 7. Since wastes are concentrated in the clarifier first stage, and all wastes must flow through the line leading to this first stage, this area Is a likely source of contamination due to leakage Into the soil. The two most likely leak sources are a joint in the wastewater line adjacent to the first stage (CI), and leakage from the clarifier first stage itself at eight foot depth. 1.4 potential Offsite Contamination Surrounding businesses are generally light service types of industry, and warehousing. To the east are primarily office buildings. Sites in the vicinity are currently undergoing investigation and/or remediation for contamination from hazardous substances. The Seller of this site, the Irvine Company, has provided a Hazardous Substance Disclosure (Orange County Airport Area, December 18, 1991, Appendix H) showing that the following sites have experienced contamination: Chevron Service Station at 18692 Mac Arthur Blvd., Irvine CA firmer Texaco Service Station at 4678 Campus Drive, Newport Beach CA iQd in Santa Ana CA B ar Wash at 4200 Birch Street, Newport Beach CA Fdler Industries at 2101 Dove Street, Newport Beach CA Unocal Service Station at SE Bristol and Santa Ana Blvd, Costa Mesa CA Glen Properties at 4320 Campus Drive, Newport Beach CA Based on the reported levels of contamination in soil and ground water, the direction and distance of each of these sites, prevailing rates of groundwater migration, and ongoing remedial activities at these sites, it is believed there is no significant effect on ground water or soil at this site. Adjacent and nearby parcels are zoned industrial and used for a variety of light industrial uses. Although there are no reports of contamination at any of these closer sites, it is quite possible that significant contamination of soils and ground water has occurred, is occurring and/or will occur where hazardous substances are In use. For this reason, we recommend drilling one ground water well as a check - insurance against otherwise unknown contamination from neighbors. 1.5 Limitations of Studv This study has been generally constrained by the need to cost effectively but accurately determine the potential liability of tenant Transchem for any possible contamination of the soil by ongoing production operations. The locations of Transchem manufacturing operations involving use and handling of hazardous chemicals, generation of hazardous wastes, discharge of hazardous waste water, and possible spills were aggressively determined. The subsoil was sampled, using approved Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards, and all known state and local standards prevailing at this time, at the most likely locations, for the most likely contaminants. Potential contamination from prior manufacturing operations, or by prior tenants or owners, were not investigated. Possible contamination from neighboring sites was not thoroughly investigated, since a groundwater well should be drilled to check this. 1 - 3 V I I I I Inspections end Investigations,li P 0 Box 26047 Santa Ana CA A047 (714)979.9529 2. SUMMARY Background information was gathered concerning this site by: review of all information provided by The Donohue Company and the Hogan Estate telephone conversation with Orange County Health Care Agency officials interviewing Transchem personnel, principally Mr. David C. Goecke, Manager, Printed Circuits, and Ernie Aiu Jr., Operations Manager, about production processes conducted, their location, hazardous wastes generated, safety and sanitation records, and waste treatment processes. literature review to analyze printed circuit board manufacturing operations for potential hazardous wastes initial site survey to observe the location of processes involving hazardous chemicals and the potential discharge of hazardous waste streams or spills, location of wastewater drain Imes, and waste treatment operations. reviewing Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS), Contingency Plan, Self- Monitoring Wastewater Analysis Reports (refer Appendix K for representative 1992 reports) to County Sanitation Districts, while interviewing Transchem personnel 2.1 Risk Assessment This Phase II Investigation is a risk assessment of the potential contamination of subsoil and groundwater due to their production operations involving hazardous wastes. The results of the background definition study include: 1. location of printed circuit board processes at this production site, and the hazardous chemicals involved in each operation 2. identification of the most likely locations for accidental discharge of hazardous wastes into the subsoil at this site 3. identification of the most likely hazardous wastes to be discharged 4. Other information pertinent to analyzing and determining the risk of subsoil and groundwater contamination due to tenant's printed circuit board production This commercial property is located in a light industrial development close to the Orange County airport. The terrain is generally a flat mesa. Based on limited information, the groundwater is believed to be at thirty to forty feet below the surface, with flow to the northwest. Most of the site exterior is asphalt paved parking lot. One large area to the rear is concrete paved, curbed, and covered, for storage of chemical drums. A smaller portion of this area is separately curbed for waste treatment operations. The building itself is 22,000 square feet, and includes the principal rooms and areas for printed circuit board production - board preparation, electroless copper plating and silk screening, pattern plating and etching, and final electroplating and etching. Figure 1 is a plan view of the building and lot, showing the production areas for investigation. To the best of our knowledge and ability to discover, Transchem has no discharge incidents on record. We determined that the most significant potential contaminants at this site were 1) copper, lead, other metals, 2) acids, bases, ammonia and cyanide, and 3) chlorinated hydrocarbons, organic solvents. Initial survey of the site revealed the most likely areas for contamination through the concrete slab due to 1) cracks, deterioration and spilled chemicals, 2) leaks from the wastewater drain line approximately 18" under the concrete slab, and 3) from the clarifier tank. Code letters on Figure 1 indicate the locations of highest estimated risk of contamination. These were selected for soil sampling. 2 - 1 O I I I I Inspoctions and Invcstigations, 190 P O Box 26047 Santa Ana CA 906047 (714)979.9529 The possibility of soil or groundwater contamination from adjacent or nearby sites was considered. Based on available information (see Section 1.4 and Appendices H and J), and with no groundwater well sampling or monitoring on site, no significant risk to this site is known or indicated. However, since there are contaminated sites to the area, it is to be expected that others might not yet have been discovered or investigated. Such unknown contaminated sites might pose significant risk to this site. This study, however, is cost- effectively focused on the potential liability of Transchem for contamination of soil or groundwater that their production operations may have caused. 2.2 Soil Sampling and Testing Four-inch holes were drilled through the concrete (or asphalt near the clarifier) at each of the selected locations. Soil type was characterized at the surface and at sampling depths. Thin-walled tube samples were taken at shallow (approximately one foot) and deep (approximately three feet) levels, to maximize the probability of plume intercept, and potentially gam some information on depth dependence of contaminant concentrations. One bore hole was drilled to fifteen feet depth near the clarifier tanks, since the first stage vault is eight feet deep. Samples here were taken at five, ten and fifteen feet. A total of twenty-five samples were taken. These included: two composite samples of surface (interior) scale, stained concrete and/or subsurface soil twenty samples from ten sampling holes, two samples each at shallow and deeper levels three samples from the one deep (15 ft.) bore hole Brass thin-walled tubes were used to contain soil samples taken where contamination by organic solvents was likely. Cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB) thin-walled tubes were used for samples at locations of suspected heavy metals contamination only. Further details of sampling strategy and procedures are described in Section 3. Samples were sealed, placed in refrigerated storage, and delivered to the chemical test laboratory within hours after they were taken. Photographs were taken of soil sampling locations and the soil sampling process; these are provided separately. Appendix F lists the photograph captions. The following chemical tests were performed on these samples: TPH-DHS 10 samples tested indicator, petrochemicals EPA 4010 5 samples tested test for halogenated organics Priority Pollutant Metals 1 sample tested test for prionty pollutant metals Copper 22 samples tested test for copper only Lead 22 samples tested test for lead only pH 19 samples tested test for acidity vs. alkalinity The chemical testing strategy was designed to maximize the chance of detecting specific potential contaminants at each sampling location. . 2.3 Results Conclusions and Recommendations Soil gas readings were collected using a Flame Ionization Detector (FID) immediately after drilling each hole (eleven total), and after each sample collection. These readings were in the range that would be expected for soil gases. Test results for all but two samples did not exceed either the permissible total threshold limit concentration (TTLC) or the soluble threshold limit concentration (STLC) for the specific contaminant. Samples StS (Storage Area -shallow) and E (Etching area - internal surfaces only) gave chemical analysis results indicating cause for concern. 2 -2 -G I I I I•Inslxctions and investigations, 190 P O Box 26047 Santa Ann CA 9101•6047 (714)979.9529 The total copper threshold limit test result was 272 mg/kg (weight parts per million - ppm) for the StS sample, much less than the TTLC for copper, but greater than the STLC. An additional STLC test of the same sample was ordered to clarify the result. This copper STLC test result was significantly less than the currently permissible STLC, thus indicating no action is required. Sample E was a composite of dried blue-green scale collected from the floor and curbing adjacent and between etch lines in the Etching area (see Figure C-1). The test result significantly exceeds the maximum permissible total threshold limit concentration. This blue-green scale is therefore a hazardous waste and is subject to all applicable rules and regulations , State and federal. The scale and sludge located on the floor and curbing in the Etching area is contaminated with an amount of copper that makes it hazardous waste. It must be removed and transported by a certified and registered hazardous waste hauler, and the hazardous waste must be disposed of at a Class I hazardous waste landfill or hazardous waste management facility regulated to accept these wastes. Detailed recommendations for the removal and mitigation of the hazardous waste from the interior surfaces are provided in Section 5, Findings and Recommendations. After removal and mitigation in accordance with guidelines of the regulatory agencies, confirmatory soil samples should be collected and analyzed for the previously detected contaminants - copper and copper compounds - to re-establish lack of threat to the environment. i i r• I I— t 2 - 3 •O I I I I Inspoctions and Invcstigadons,190 PO Box 26047 Santa Ann CA 9206047 (714)979.9529 3. SOIL SAMPLING: STRATEGY AND PROCEDURE Soil sampling is the next step in risk assessment - the ultimate goal being to provide an accurate estimate of the significance or insignificance of risk to the environment posed by the potential contaminants at this site. This goal cannot be achieved absolutely, since: 1. the integrity of concrete floors, floor drains, wastewater drain lines, and clarifier vaults cannot be established beyond a reasonable doubt 2. the subsurface soils cannot be sampled and tested so extensively as to provide a 100% characterization It is possible, however, to maximize the likelihood of detecting any contaminant that has escaped precautionary measures due to leaks or carelessness, through careful selection of sampling locations, soil sampling depths, and chemical testing strategy for samples collected. Careful collection of background data provides the basis. Section 1 has provided a description of the background data for this site. Site inspection is undoubtedly the most critical element in forming the basis for sampling and testing strategy. 3.1 SITE INSPECTION Dr. Miller conducted a preliminary site inspection. Gilbert Rabago, Project Environmental Chemist, assisted Dr. Miller in performing the initial site survey prior to actual drilling and sampling. Several processing areas in the building showed evidence of potential contamination. Discoloration and deterioration of the tile adjacent to the floor drain in the photo lab was cause for concern. Spent developing solutions, spent resist removal solutions and spent acid solutions are among the potential wastes that could seep through deteriorated concrete, or out of leaking wastewater drain lines. The highest risk to the environment would be a leaking wastewater drain line elbow underneath the floor drain. A sampling location 'P' was chosen about 1 ft. from the floor drain, in a location not likely to damage the drain line. Tile and cement near the silk screen room hood were badly discolored and deteriorated. Many tiles were completely gone, and the concrete damaged by apparent attack by chemicals. Although we could not see cracks in the concrete, porosity was considered possible. Many potential contaminants could have leaked through this floor. This deteriorated location was selected as sampling hole 'S.' Wastewater from the silk screen room was routed through a visible pipe to the floor drain in the room outside, the Observation/inspection room (0). Since wastewater from the silk screening process contains many pollutants, potential leakage from the wastewater drain line elbow underneath the Observation room floor drain was considered a significant risk. This floor drain was chosen as a location. The sampling location '0' was chosen to be 1 ft. from the floor drain. The fiber optic extrusion room presented no visual evidence of contamination. This industrial process had been moved out, and the room appeared quite clean. However, we were informed that industrial solvents were used. We chose a floor drain close to the location where most of the processing activities took place. A 4-in. sampling hole 'F' was drilled close to this floor drain. The Acid Bath area (see AB, Figure 1) concrete floor was damaged badly in one location. The damage appeared primarily mechanical, but the floor was penetrated more than an Inch, over a 6-in. diameter radius. Since wastewater could spill and sit in this hole in the concrete for periods of time, penetration was considered possible. The hole was therefore selected as site for a sampling hole, 'AB.' i 3 - 1 O I I I I Inspoctions and Imstigations,190 P O Box 26047 Santa Ana CA 96-6047 (714)979-9529 Water was observed to settle and remain standing in a certain floor section of the Electroplating area. Since the potential for spillage of heavy metal bath residues is high in this area, sampling location EP was chosen here. Extensive areas of floor and curbing, near etchant lines between baths were coated with a thick, crusty, blue-green scale or sludge. A sampling hole location 'E' was chosen at a feasible location nearby for drilling nearby, outside the curbing. All of the interior floor drains and other wastewater drains lead ultimately to the clarifier, outside the building on the parking lot side. The wastewater drain line has an elbow before entering the first stage vault of the clarifier. Wastes in this line, and in the first stage itself, have the highest concentrations on site. The drainline elbow is especially vulnerable to leaks, in our judgment. Therefore, sample hole 'CI' was drilled adjacent to this drain line, near the expected location of the elbow. This location is inside the protective fence around the clarifier. t, We measured the depth of the clarifier first stage vault to be about eight feet below the top, at the parking lot level. Wastes are most concentrated in this stage. Potential leakage of this vault poses a great threat to the environment. To check on this threat it was necessary to drill a much deeper hole, since seepage from the tank bottom could possibly only be detected at depths much greater than ;ght feet. The hole location 'BC' was selected just outside the fence adjacent to the first stage vault, for feasible drilling. The Storage area outside appeared quite clean, but drums of waste and raw material chemicals were both stored here. Leakage of waste drums is an especially high risk. In addition, there was a visible crack in the concrete in a low lying part in the concrete pad, where storm water or spilled chemicals would remain standing. This area was therefore selected as sampling hole 'St.' Permitted waste treatment operations were conducted in specialized equipment in this general area as well. Inside another curbed area were the vats and auxiliary equipment for processing the waste. There was another crack in the concrete here, in an area where spillage of waste sludges was quite possible. This represented a high potential risk to the environment, so sampling location 'R' was selected here. 3.2 SAMPLING STRATEGY A total of eleven sample locations were chosen. Composite surface samples were planned to be collected from two of these, because of evident chemical deposits on or near the planned sampling location. There were extensive areas of crusty blue-green scale on the concrete slab and curbing near etchant lines close to sampling location 'E.' Portions of this scale were chipped off using a plastic knife to form a composite sample for chemical testing. At sampling location 'AB,' a six-inch diameter area had suffered mechanical damage, penetrating the concrete by an inch or more. Additionally, the concrete in this hole appeared discolored, eroded, and mixed with some chemical residue. A composite sample of surface material, broken concrete, and some subsurface soil was collected by preliminary work just prior to and during the initial drilling operations at this sampling location. 3 -2 I " 0111 i Inspoctions and Investigations, P O Box 26047 Snnia Ana CA&9.6047 (714)979.9529 Samples for ten of the eleven holes (BC being the exception) were to be taken at shallow (approximately one foot level) and deep (approximately three feet) levels, in order to maximize the probability of intercepting both water-soluble inorganic compounds and more volatile cleaning agents, whether leaked from wastewater drain lines or by seepage through cracks or other defects in the concrete slab. Sampling location BC, intended to detect leakage from the first stage clarifier vault, required a different strategy because the bottom of the tank is eight feet deep. A leak might be in the very bottom of such a tank. Therefore a hole must be drilled much deeper than be feet, and as close as possible to the tank periphery. A commercial driller could drill to fifteen feet, and samples could be taken at five, ten and fifteen feet. 3.3 SAMPLING PROCEDURES Four-inch diameter holes were drilled in the concrete slabs or asphalt, for ten of the eleven holes. The soil immediately below was.examined and characterized. Hydrocarbon concentrations were measured using the portable Flame Ionization Detect6r (FID) at this time. Drilling was continued to a depth of approximately one foot. A thin-walled tube soil sampler was used to collect a sample at the shallow (S) depth. The number of blows required to collect each sample was recorded. This provides a measure of the soil compaction at the sample depth. The soil at this level was examined and characterized briefly. The FID was used again to sample for hydrocarbon vapors. Drilling was now continued to approximately three feet level, where the soil sampler was used again to collect another sample. Soil examination was repeated. Hydrocarbon vapors were now sampled at this level using the FID. All soil samples in thin-wallled tubes were capped with teflon liners, covered with plastic end caps, sealed with vinyl electrical tape, labeled, and placed in refrigerated storage for transfer to the chemical laboratory. A driller was subcontracted through Geo-Etka to drill a six-inch diameter, fifteen foot hole for sampling at five, ten and fifteen feet at the 'BC' ("beside the clarifier") location. Procedure was similar, except that drilling was accomplished with a truck mounted, mobile drill rig, equipped with a six-inch diameter, five-foot continuous flight, helical augers. Details concerning this procedure, and a boring log, are presented in Appendix A, "Limited Subsurface Soil Sampling and Analytical Data Interpretation," a report by Geo- Etka, Inc. Appendix D provides a brief Sampling Log in tabular form, of: • sampling: selection and details • soil drilling, type, and samples • FID test results Twenty-five soil samples were taken. Two of these were composite samples, one taken from surface scale and sludge on concrete surfaces in the Etching area (E), and the other a mixture of chemical residue from the surface, deteriorated concrete from the floor- damaged area near the Acid Baths (AB), and subsurface soil. Twenty of these samples were shallow and deep samples taken from ten specific locations (all locations except BC). Three samples were taken from the BC location, at five, ten and fifteen feet. , i 3 - 3 b 11 i I Inspections and lnvestigations,02 F O Box 26047 Santa Ana 68799.6047 (714)979.9529 4. CHEMICAL TESTING Associated Laboratories of Orange, CA, an EPA Contract Laboratory, was chosen to perform chemical testing for hazardous wastes in these samples. They are certified by Orange County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles County Sanitation District, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration, for all fields of testing required. 4.1 TESTING STRATEGY To maximize chances of detecting specific potential contaminants, a list of the most likely contaminants was prepared for each location. Conditions at each location were also taken into account in selecting samples for intensive testing. For example, the Etching area ES sample was chosen for priority pollutant metal testing because concentrated metal contamination was visible as a scale on nearby concrete floor and curbing. Five samples from four areas expected to have used organic solvents werp tested for the full EPA 8010 series - halogenated organics. Because copper and ldhd were likely contaminants of high risk at all locations, most samples (22 of the 25) were tested for copper and lead. Appendix B presents the Chain of Custody Records; these clearly show the chemical tests selected for each soil sample, and establish the line of custody for all samples prior to laboratory testing, as required for hazardous waste testing. 4.2 TEST RESULTS Appendix E provides a copy of the detailed chemical test results. These same results are shown in the tabular Soil Sampling Log, Appendix D, in the columns to the far right. The first chemical tests performed were portable Flame Ionization Detector readings taken at each sample hole, for each depth of excavation. These readings are also presented in Appendix D. Although some of these readings are higher than we expected, none were accompanied by any tell-tale odor of volatile organic compounds. These readings are not inconsistent with the presence of normal quantities of soil gases. Since no chemical tests confirmed the presence of any volatile organic compounds to the soil, the FID test results are believed indicative of normal soil gases only. Except for the two samples E and StS, chemical test results did not exceed the permissible total threshold limit concentration (TTLC) value of 2,500 mg/kg (ppm) for copper, nor of T,000 mg/kg (ppm) for lead, nor for any other potential contaminant. Furthermore, none of these test results exceeded the permissible soluble threshold limit concentration (STLC) for copper, lead or other contaminant. Only the chemical test results for two samples StS and E required careful consideration. Total copper measured in the StS sample was 272 mg/kg (ppm), which is much less than the TTLC for copper, but greater than the permissible STLC of 25 ppm. However, a test for total copper cannot properly be compared to an STLC. A separate test was indicated for soluble copper compounds. This STLC test is a better measure of copper mobility in the soil, and risk to groundwater. The test was ordered and performed. The result was 21.7 mg/liter (ppm) of soluble copper (STLC), indicating hazardous waste is not present. Sample E was a composite of dried blue-green sludge or loose, crusty scale of obvious chemical contamination on the concrete floor and curbing in the Etching area. The scale was easily scraped free using a plastic knife, and collected into a thin-walled CAB tube sampler for analysis. The test result (see Appendices D and E) was 220,000 mg/kg (ppm), or 22 weight percent, much greater than the TTLC of 2,500 ppm. The scale at location E is clearly a heavy metal hazardous waste, primarily copper compounds. 4- 1 O 111 I Inspections and Investigations,190 P O Box 26047 Santa Ann CA 90.6047 (714)979.9529 5. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS No significant levels of hydrocarbons, halogenated organics, or petroleum derivatives were detected by chemical analysis of samples from chosen locations. None of the TPH- DHS tests gave a significant result, and the five EPA 8010 tests for halogenated organics yielded insignificant quantities. Although Flame Ionization Detector readings ranged from 1 to 60 ppm during sample collection, no volatile organic smells were detected in the soil. Results are consistent with traces of soil gas at certain locations such as the Observation (0) and Etching (E) areas, and boring next to the clarifier (BC). The shallow sample from soil sampling location 'St' in the outside storage area was found to contain 272 mg/kg (ppm) total copper, much less than the permissible total threshold limit concentration (TTLC) of 2,500 mg/kg. Since the result is greater than the permissible soluble threshold limit concentration (STLC) of 25 mg/liter, the sample was retested for soluble (extractable) copper for proper comparison with the STLC. The final result of 21.7 mg/liter soluble copper is less than the STLC of 25 mg/liter. Therefore, no further action is indicated. 11 Only one area of significant contamination was found: the test result of 220,000 mg/kg of copper in the composite sample from blue-green scale and dried sludge found on the interior concrete floor and curbing near etchant lines in the Etching area. A detectable but insignificant level of lead was also determined for this sample. The total copper is 22 weight percent, much higher than the TTLC of 2,500 ppm. Copper and/or copper compounds are inorganic, persistent and bioaccumulative toxic substances. At this concentration the scale is hazardous waste and must be handled and disposed of as such. The following recommendations are made to properly remove and mitigate this hazardous waste in accordance with applicable law, regulations, and regulatory guidelines/guidance: 1. Contaminated material (blue-green scale/sludge in the Etching area (E) must be removed and transported by a certified and registered hazardous waste hauler. The contaminated material must be disposed of at a Class I hazardous waste landfill or other waste management facility specifically regulated by State and county agencies to accept such hazardous wastes. The use of a registered hazardous waste hauler is required and photocopy(ies) of all hazardous waste manifests, signed by the receiving disposal face 1ty, must be obtained for verification of proper disposal. 2. Contaminated materials should be removed using approved and permitted site mitigation techniques and procedures, in accordance with all applicable ordinances of federal, state, county and local hazardous waste laws and regulations. All removal and mitigative actions for these contaminated concrete surfaces must be performed with specific approval of all local regulatory and enforcing agencies, in accordance with their guidelines. 3. Permits and requirements from any applicable controlling and/or other regulatory or enforcing agency relating to any site mitigation, must be obtained prior to actual undertaking of the chosen remedial action. 4. After the surface scale/sludge has been removed from existing layers of concrete, confirmatory soil samples are to be collected and analyzed for previously detected contaminants - copper and copper compounds. This test will demonstrate that actual concentrations present in subsurface soils after removal of contaminated material are below established limits. Thus actual and potential environmental impacts are reduced, and threat to immediate surroundings is eliminated. 5- 1 49I1II Inspections and investigations,itt� P0 Box 26047 Santa Ana CA9218o47 (M)979.9529 5. Copies of this complete environmental assessment should be submitted to Orange County Health Care Agency, Environmental Health, Industrial Clean-up section for review and approval. If required, we will prepare a remedial action proposal and contamination removal workplan, and submit same to all regulatory agencies involved for their approval. r— I a. i , r— I, I" 5 -2 I IIII � INSPECTIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION °A- PPENDv Q UMTEDD SUBSURFACE SM SAMPLM AND ANALYMAL DATA WERPRETAMON PREPAREDBY GILBERT ROBAGO GEO-ETKA, INC. 739 N. MAIN STREET (714) 771-6911 A-1 f P O Box 26047 SANTA ANA CA 92799-6047 (714) 979-9529 rNMi{�YMMYAMnWvo3�'d+}Ue:.rGY•'}I••a^•yb+>. •.re .r.. • +•'npl(VM4'�V' Mi• GEO-ETKA, INC. ESTABLISHED 1965 FOUNDATION SOIL INVESTIGATION,ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, PAVEMENT DESIGN,SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS, NT yl. COMPACTION CONTROL.PERCOLATION STUDIES, I. MATERIAL INSPECTION AN LyJ ENY M IRONMEAL ENGINEERING. G,. ,= ORANGE-MAIN BUSINESS PARK 739 N.MAIN STREET,ORANGE, CA 92668 (714)771.6911 FA%(714(771.1275 LIMITED SUBSURFACE SOIL SAMPLING (I AND ANALYTICAL DATA INTERPRETATION AT TRANSCHEM A Division of Jetronics Industries, Inc. 3767 Birch Street Newport Beach, California AND PREPARED FOR IIII Inspections and Investigations 3136 Bermuda Drive Costa Mesa, California 92626 June 11, 1992 Job No: ET-6104-92 • ! GEO-ETKA7 INC. ESTABLISHED 1965 FOUNDATION SOIL INVESTIGATION.ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, PAVEMENT DESIGN,SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS, COMPACTION CONTROL,PERCOLATION STUDIES, MATERIAL INSPECTION TESTING, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. G ORANGE-MAIN BUSINESS PARK 739 N.MAIN STREET,ORANGE, CA 92669 (714)771.6911 FAX(714)771.1278 June 11, 1992 IIII Inspections and Investigations 3136 Bermuda Drive )I Costa Mesa, California 92626 Attention: Dr. J. Wesley Miller Subject: Limited Subsurface Soil Sampling and Analytical Data Interpretation Reference: Transchem-a division of Jetronics Industries, Inc. 3767 Birch Street Newport Beach, California Job No: ET-6104-92 Dear Dr. Miller: In accordance with your request, enclosed please find the follow- ing information obtained for the above referenced subject site. It should be noted that the following information is the result of a limited subsurface soil sampling investigation, conducted outside the building, by the clarifier of the subject site. The limited scope of this preliminary investigation was prepared according to the items specifically requested -and it covers a limited subsurface soil sampling investigation and analytical data interpretation only. other parts, locations, current environmental conditions, future environmental impacts and/or other aspects of intrusive environ- mental assessment procedures used to determine the absence or presence of selected contaminants including but not limited to background research, chemical analyses, boring locations, addi- tional soil sampling, whether at the surface or subsurface depths, installation, monitoring and sampling of groundwater wells and/or any other type of environmental sampling at the sub- ject site, is well beyond the scope of this very limited and preliminary soil sampling investigation. 1 GEO-ETKA, INC. Job No: ET-6104-92 1. 0 Subsurface Soil Sampling Procedures On May 22, 1992 , a single exploratory boring was drilled adjacent to the clarifier outside the building at a location previously selected by representative of IIII Inspections and Investigations Division. The approximate boring location is shown on Plate "A", attached herewith. 1' This individual boring was drilled to a total depth of 15 feet below the ground surface at the existing grade. The subsurface soil drilling was accomplished by using a truck mounted, mobile drill rig, .equipped with a six-inch diameter, 5-foot continuous flight, helical augers. Dual soil samples, from this exploratory boring, were collected at 5 feet intervals, beginning at 5 feet below the ground surface until the total depth was reached. When the target depth was reached, undisturbed soil samples were collected using a modified California split-spoon sampler con- taining three six-inch long, 2. 5 inch diameter brass tubes. Upon collection of the soil samples, the samples were capped with teflon liners, covered with plastic end caps and sealed with vinyl electrical tape. Geological classifications of the subsurface materials encoun- tered, during the exploratory drilling, along with all pertinent soil observations were recorded and are presented in the attached Plate "B" . Individual soil samples were labeled, logged in and placed in a clean ice chest containing fresh ice, until delivered to a state certified analytical laboratory for chemical analyses. Appropriate chain-of-custody records were completed and main- tained by qualified field personnel and are presented in Plate loci$ , included herein. 2 GEO-ETKA, INC. Job No: ET-6104-92 2 , 0 Surface Conditions The surface is fairly level and asphalt and concrete pavement covers most of the areas between the building and the parking lot. Healthy, well groomed vegetation is limited to the landscaped planters and curbside. I f At the surface of the exploratory boring location, three to four inches of asphaltic concrete paving were encountered. 3 .0 Subsurface Soil Conditions During the exploratory drilling phase of this limited and preliminary investigation, the most predominant subsurface soil materials encountered on-site consisted primarily of interbedded alluvial sediments comprising mostly of clayey silty sands, silty sandy clays, sandy clays, clayey sands and sandy silty clays. Perched conditions and/or shallow groundwater was not encountered within the maximum depth explored of 15 feet below ground surface at the time the exploratory drilling was conducted. For detailed description of the subsurface soil materials encoun- tered at this boring location, refer to the attached boring log. Soil gas readings were collected using a portable FID Instrument, gas readings ranged from 20 to 45 parts per million (PPM) . 4 . 0 Analytical Data Interpretation Based on the analytical data provided to this office on June 4 , 1992 , 2 : 45 pm, via facsimile mail , it appears' that the soil sample labeled "STs" , collected outside the storage area, has a concentration of copper of 272 ppm. This concentration of copper is below the currently permissible total threshold limit concentration (TTLC) , however, it exceeds the soluble threshold limit concentration ('STLC) for this inor- ganic substance. 3 GEO-ETKA, INC. Job No: ET-6104-92 4 . 0 Analytical Data Interpretation (cont'd) Further inspection of the analytical data provided to this of- fice, indicates that the soil sample labeled "E" and obtained from a composite sample of the dried blue-green sludge located adjacent and between the etch lines, the floor and the curbs, contained concentrations of copper and/or copper compounds at levels exceeding the currently permissible total threshold limit concentration for this substance, and as such is e6nsidered a hazardous waste subject to all applicable rules and regulations pertaining thereto. All other soil samples, to the extent of the analytical data provided to' this office being accurate, do not appear, at this time, to exceed any of the currently permissible action levels for the selected contaminants analyzed. 5. 0 Conclusions and Recommendations Information obtained during this limited and preliminary inves- tigation, suggests that only one area of the subject site, namely, e etch line is contaminated at the surface. that of the , Inspection of the analytical data provided ed to this office and y previously discussed, indicates that the presence of copper and/or copper compounds was detected at a concentration of 220, 000 ppm, exceeding the currently permissible total threshold limit concentration of 2, 500 ppm. Copper and/or copper compounds are inorganic, persistent and bioaccumulative toxic substances and at the present concentration of 220, 000 milligrams per kilogram in the waste (sludge) which exceeds its total threshold limit concentratio n is a hazardous waste. It is recommended that, since the sludge is contaminated with more than 2 , 500 ppm copper, then the contaminated material must be removed and transported by a certified and registered hazard- ous waste hauler and the contaminated material must be disposed of at a Class I, hazardous waste landfill or other sanitary landfill and/or other waste management facility specifically designed and agency regulated to accept such (hazardous) wastes. 4 GEO-ETKA, INC. Job No: ET-6104-92 5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations (cont'd) Please note then that the use of a registered hazardous waste hauler is required and photocopy (ies) of every single hazardous waste manifest, signed by the receiving disposal facility, must be obtained for verification of proper disposal. It is recommended that the contaminated materials be removed using approved and permitted site mitigation techniques and pro- cedures in accordance to all applicable ordinances of federal, state, county and local hazardous wastes laws and regulations. All action taken to mitigate the contaminated surface near and adjacent to the etch line and any required subsequent confirma- tion soil sampling, must be performed with the approval of all local regulatory and enforcing agencies and in accordance with their specific guidelines. All permits and requirements from any applicable controlling and/or other regulatory or enforcing agency relating to any site mitigation, must be obtained prior to the actual undertaking of the chosen remedial action itself. It is also recommended that after the surface sludge has been completely removed from the existing layers of concrete, confir- matory soil samples to be collected and analyzed for the previ- ously detected contaminants, namely, copper and copper compounds, in order to ascertain that the actual concentrations present in the subsurfabe soils after the removal of contaminated material are below the established limits and thereby reduce the environ- mental impact and/or eliminate the threat to the immediate sur- roundings. _ It is recommended also, that for the soil sample "STs" exhibiting a concentration of 272 ppm copper, a waste extraction test be conducted, since the total concentration of this substance ex- ceeds the STLC value but does not exceed the TTLC value. 5 GEO-ETKA, INC. Job No: ET-6104-92 5_0 Conclusions and Recommendations (cont'd) This waste extraction test shall be performed to determine the amount of extractable substance in the soil sample, and provided that the resultant soluble concentration of copper, obtained by further chemical analyses of this soil sample does not exceed the soluble threshold limit concentration (STLC) of 25 milligrams per liter, this soil material will not ,meet the hazardous waste clas- sification criterion, and as such, it should not present a sig- nificantly adverse impact upon the current environmental condi- tions. It is further recommended and required prior to any remedial ac- tions, that copies of the complete environmental assessment prepared by IIII Inspections and Investigation be submitted to the Orange County Health Care Agency, Environmental Health, In- dustrial Clean-up section for review and approval . If required a remedial action proposal and contamination removal workplan will be prepared by this office and submitted to all regulatory agencies involved. 6. 0 Limitations Further and/or future environmental impacts upon the subject property are beyond the scope of this limited and preliminary subsurface soil sampling and analytical data interpretation in- vestigation. The assessment. of potential contaminants and/or those already ex- isting at the subject property, was based on limited data and our best estimate of project conditions. No other warranty, express or implied, is offered herein or by Geo-Etka, Inc. No representations are made, suggested, or implied in this report, or by any Geo-Etka, Inc. personnel as to the quality of materials not readily observed and/or tested by Geo-Etka, Inc. , or analytical parameters not cited herein. This report has been prepared expressly for IIII Inspections and Investigations Division and is directed toward complying with their specific needs. The use of this report is limited to IIII Inspections and Inves- tigations and must not be submitted in this format to any approv- ing regulatory and/or funding agencies. 6 GEO-ETKA, INC. Job No: ET-6104-92 6. 0 Limitations (cont1d) Future review and/or interpretation of the currently permissible contaminants levels, should consider future enforcement agency's regulatory changes, beyond our control, that may be or have been enacted subsequent to the preparation of this report. The assessment for potential and%or existent contaminants at this property, was based on limited data and only those analytical parameters and/or chemical analyses, analytical methods or in- struments used in the performance of these analyses. Our professional judgments as to assess the potential for con- tamination and/or that already existing on-site was based on this limited data. No other warranty, expressed, suggested •or implied is offered herein or by Geo-Etka, Inc. Contact this office if you have any questions or comments regard- ing this report or should you need further assistance in this matter. Respectfully Submitted, GEO-ETKA, INC. �rrnn f V!� Gilbert M. Rabago Project Envkronjm�ental chemist Ahm d Ali President GR/AA/ak 7 I 1..,I,1CU 1\,InC AICA Fenced, Curbed, i and Covered i 1 Storage Area t _ at^a I jna ....._....L I D PARKING II PA4KI` G �s - F-T-.-..' I I� Approximate Boring a T Location . 1 I Fenced Clarifter Area r_-�--._� . - - .V— PARKING .aTxa ^� T - •v a I o E s°a Ne..pn NTaaN*cE 5767 Bi"Street 1 rtB"CA e BIRCH STRF:RT Geo-Etka, Inc. Job No: ET-6104-92 Plate "A" . GEO-ETKA, Inc. )Job No: ET-6104-92 BORING NUMBER ONE Depth Gastechtor in Letter Visual Chemical Readings (Feet) Symbol Classification Odor In (PPM) O AC ± 3" Asphalt Paving SM Red brown, slightly clayey silty fine sand; Moderately • "'' moist, moderately dense Very moist, slightly dense : None 5� 25 CL Red brown, silty fine sandy clay; Moderately moist, firm CL Gray brown, slightly fine sandy clay; Moist, firm Sc Tan to brown, slightly No Odor 45 10 ' clayey fine medium sand; •;s :• Moderately moist, very dense ::.. sj•;:::;, CL Gray brown, fine sandy silty clay; Moist, firm None 20 15 ' • Depth of bag sample a Depth of undisturbed sample 13 No recovery SZ Ground water r VERTICAL SCALE 1" = 3 ' Plate "B" J A Auvi%ZSS: 51.11 =69 A ;OCi/1'17:0 L/11JORi11G1,f1:; R � � � � �CA flmtJ. !lure+;u Omnry+, rul.lot n... 91GL1 • 711/7%1�L;100 PITON[ 11:_]1..F _q-��� CI(AIN 0f CUSTODY nrC01l .,` 1,110J.110. 1*110ACT ItAmE L/ i(�[(�q Ito. Typo. r.•.xlr_Ef15: IJ.f..•t,,..l r of �/ of . colt. E '�mplc n IJnnJ;; ( � Twtn Ut' i aw,n0.i Ow;f Ttu[ tl n S;wTOtt lOUitOtt u Al CI- S 'ED -C-) SI _ _ �( �- ( )3 a4- r( !tea ems' : I ICI �' i - -i c �. pit • - - - w c2 sue; Z�L�i� so � 3- �` � _ - � _ ��-� f�.s � �• � b s114iOD CZ) x I © r� ��' 1 - - . C of iPr-(-i�y5 BIZ �2 ! O 3 D S i' u..•I i U b I ?•tnr •IJtcn• ...••P I .J by: /S•t•v tv.l IL linqunhrJ bY: IS:r•••t.••1 Utl. /16 Il r<.. .�b t I. 1'. •.l Ul t /Tina Ill t(n..J' Y. fLt••..v•I Il.linqunf.rJ by: ff r••t••••1 Ut t.JT:m. Alt,...J by: 1:.�•••r./ U.u ! Inm irh..nl Ipr 1 Jr.tu.y by: I Utt. /T.nu Ilan ult -GEO-ETKZ , Inc. n I r IJ:r•t ••1 f ( I Job NO: ET-6104-92 J`�v:�s /t1tp��ri 2�-422t p Plate " • � i IIII INSPECTIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION APPENDIX C 1� SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS C-1 P O Box 26047 SANTA ANA CA 92799-6047 (714) 979-9529 I I Cur4tinse Area • Fenced, Curbed, I and Covered I R Ee I —' IStorage Area ISte , W_ EXIT I ' AB . I o EP exrr h PARKING PARKING I EXIT OF I 6 X 15' Borfng EXIT i Ci B o; �O i I LI 1 I _ LEGEND: rcnccd __ _ 0 o s o -Drilled Sample Holes Cladficr rl IAB -Code(a;Sample Hole Area PARKING -EXIT I T `-'I Y I _I _J I ENTRANCE 5767 B;ral.Stveet Newport B"CA BIRCH STREET SOI L SAMPLING LOCATIONS IIII INSPECTIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION APPENM D I, SUL SSAMPUNG LOG: TABLE E D-1 P O Box 26047 SANTA ANA CA 92799-6047 (714) 979-9529 lJ„bWih.ri •:M•r. 1 .• .rr. -e Trans-Chem Phase II Site Assessment: Area: Sampling: Soil: FED TPH-DHS EPA$010 Priority Pollutant Copper Lead pH Station No. Selection,Details Drilling,Typ4 Samples Test _ Mews (TTLC) (ITLC) Photo Lab possibly photographic developers,but Drilled 4-hole close to lab floor drain for otherwise a background sample shallow and deep soil sam les PS Sampled 5-22 @ 1030;2'diam.soil red-brown slightly clayey fine sandy silt, I ppm 13.3 ppm 5.0 ppm 3.E6 sampler,shallow(I fQ,17 blows rw odofs with 308 hammer-6'drive 6'brass tube,teflon-lined plastic end caps,scaled with vinyl electrical tape PD Sampled 5-22 @ 1230,2'diam.soil same soil type as shallow E ppm 15.7 ppm 5.0 ppm E.88 sampler,deep(3 R.).17 blows with 30#hammer,6'drive _ 6'brass tube.tcflon-lined plastic rnd caps,scaled with vinyl electrical tape Silk Screen Room Solvents used under hood.but We Drilled 4'hole where the and cement and cement deteriorated:no floor show deteriaration,probably from dmin:drain pipe above floor(cads to chemicals,to collect shallow and deep Observation Room soil samples SS Sampled 5-22 @ 1035;2-diam.mil tan-brown slightly clayey silty fine and 3 ppm ND<5 ppm 13.1 ppm 5.0 ppm sampler,shallow(1 IL).7 blows with 30N hammer,6'drive 6'brass robe,tenon-lined plastic end caps,sealed with vinyl electrical u _ SD Sampled 5-22 @ 1235;2'dim soil same soil ripe as shallow sample 4 ppm ND• 13.6 ppm 5.0 ppm sampler,dap(3 f.).7 blows with 30M hammer.a drive 6'brass rube.teflon-lined plastic end caps.scaled with viral electrical tape Observation Room Drain line from Silk Screen Room Drilled 4-hole close to tfloor drain for into floor drain here shallow and deep soil samples OS Sampled 5-22�m 1030.2'diam.soil dark-gm.slightly clayey silty fine sand, 40 ppm ND<5 ppm TCE 0.020 ppm 6•70 sample.shallow(I f.).10 blows degraded organic odors TeuachlwoetMx 0019 ppn with 300 hammer,6'drive ND a 6-brass tube,te0on0lined plastic end caps.sealed with vinyl electrical D OD Sampled 5.22 @ 1240,2'diam.soil same soil type as shallow sample 60 ppm ND<5 ppm 14.0 ppm ND<5 ppm sampler.deep(3.2 M.10 blows with 30R hammer,6-drive _ 6'brass tube,tenon-lined plastic end caps,sealed with vinyl electrical tape Area: Sampling: Soil: FID TPH-DHS EPA8010 PriorityPollutaot Copper Lead pH Station No. Selection,Details Drilling,Type,Samples Tests Metals (TTLC) (TfLC) Fiber Optic Cable possible contamination;no evidence- Drilled C hole nor floor drain closest to Extrusion Room production ceased.facilities removed prior production,and lowest in the area FS Sampled 5.22 Gm I045;2'diam snit red-brown slightly clayey silty finesand; <I ppm ND<5 ppm TCE 0.040 ppm 37.6 ppm 5.36 ppm sampler.shallow(I fL).12 blows no ebemical odors Tetrachtoroethene 0030 ppm with 30a hammer,6'drive ND 6'brass fubc,te0on-lined plastic end caps.sealed with vim I electrical tape FD sampled 5-22 G 1245:2'diam.soil same soil type as shallow sample 28 ppm ND<5 ppm ND- sampler,deep(3.4 fL),12 blows with 309 hammer.6'drive 6'inui tube,te0on4ined plastic end caps,sealed with vinyl electrical tape Clarifier Area clarifier Ist stage tank 8'decp;cone. Drilled 4'hole oar and below w.w.drain (Inside Fence) chemicals-potential contamination line into clarifier.R near and below level from leak in drain line or tank of 1st sage vault CIS Sampled 5-22 r 0643:2'daim sail wet.dark brown slightly clayey silty fine 0 ppm ND<5 ppm 22.6 ppm ND<5 ppm 9.45 sampler.shallow 12.5 ft.).15 blows sand.light odor ofdeca)ed organic matter with 300 hammer.6'drive 6'brass tube,leflondined plastic end caps,sealed with vinyl electrical tape CID Sampled 5-22,a 0716;2'soil same soil ripe as shallow sample,also wet I ppm ND<5 ppm 21.1 ppm 6.40 ppm 9.26 sampler,dcep(3.5 R.),18 blows with 30M hammer,6'drive 6'brass robe,tenon-lined plastic end caps,scaled with vinyl electrical tape Clarifier Area clarifier In stage tank T deep:cone. Drilled 4-hole near and below level of (Outside Fence) chcmimis-potential contamination It stage vault.to 56,10R and 151L from leak in drain line or clarifier levels,using Gec-Etka commercial vaults.asp Inn . driller,close to protective feria BC-I Sampled 5-22(1115;2.5'soil soil type? 25 ppm ND<5 ppm ND• 17.1 ppm 5.68 ppm 8.10 sampler.shallow(5 IL).6'drive 6'brass mbe,ie0on-lined plastic end caps,sated with vinyl electrical tape BC-2 Sampled 5.22 ra•1135:2.5'diam. soil type? 45 ppm 72.3 ppm ND<5 ppm sod sampler-10 n.depth.6'drive 6'brass tube,tenon-lined plastic end Caps,sealed with vinyl electrical tape BC-3 Sampled 5-22 r 1210;2.5'diam soil type? 20 ppm _ 33.8 ppm 6.14 ppm soil sampler.dcep(IS f.).6'drive 6'brass tube.tellon-lined plastic end caps,staled with vinyl electrical tape 7 Area: Sampling: Sol: FED TPH-DHS EPA8010 Priority Pollutant Copper Lead pH , Station No. Selection,Details Drilling,Type,Samples Tests Mew MLQ (MC) Etching Area possible seepage orcommntrated Drilled 4•bole close to curb at low paint copper compounds evident on floor where copper compounds Dolled on floor E Sampled 5-26 @ 1109.composite dryed chemical sludge on interior concrete 220,000 46.5 ppm 7.27 sample ofdrved blue-green sludge floor and curb surfaces.no soil ppm adjacent and butwan etch lines on (interior) floor.curb 6'cellulose acetate butvut5(CAB)tube, teflondineB palstie end caps,scaled with ' vinyl electrical tape ES Sampled 5-26 Gm l 15S:2'diam.soil dark brown-red sandy clayey silt 30 ppm 11.300 ppm Al 65.9 ppm 7.91 sampler,shallow(1 ft.).11 blows ND<U ppm Sb Cu with 30N hammer.6'drive 5.17 ppm As 51.7 ppm Ba 0.57 ppm Be ND<0.2 ppm Cd 2,130 ppm Ca 12.2 ppm Cr 6.91 ppm Co 12,300 ppm Fe 2.690 ppm Mg 286 ppm Mn ND<0.07 ppm Hg 6.12 ppm Ni 2,480 ppm K ND<I ppm Se ND<O.l ppm Ag 512 ppm Na ND<I ppm 71 26.6ppm V 29.5 ppm Zn 6'CAB tube.teflon-lined plastic end caps.sealed with vinyl electrical tape ED Sampled 5-26 r 1220.2•dim.soil dark brown-red,stiff,silty clay with very 40 ppm 17.2 ppm 5.48 ppm 8.94 sampler,deep(3 ft).15 blows with fine sand 30N hammer.6'drive t 6'CAB tube,Teflon-lined plastic end caps,scaled with vinyl electrical tape • I Area: Sampling: Soil: FED TPH-DHS EPA8010 Priority Pollutant Copper Lead pH Station No. Selection,Details Drilling,Type,Samples Tests Metals (T MC) (TTLC) Acid Bath Area Cement Boor damaged-eroded and Drilled 4'tole through the damaged area attacked by chemicals to 1'deep AS-1 Sampled 5.26 @ 1051,Y diam eroded and broken concrete,wit to 1' 158 ppm 13.0 ppm 11.40 composite sample,surface concrete to below concrete;light brown silty fine- (partly I'below concrete mediom-coarse sand interior) 6'CAB tube•tt lon-lined planic end Caps.sealed with vinyl electrical tape AS-2 Sampled 5.26 r I110;2'diam soil light brown silty fine-medium-coarse 1-5 ppm 60.3 ppm ND<5 ppm 6.39 sampler,shallow(6'to I ft.).9 blows sand;no odors with 30N hammer-6'drive 6'CAB tube,teflon-lined plastic end caps,sealed with vinyl electrical tape AB-3 Sampled 5.26!g I210;2'diam.soil dark brown sandy silly day 30 ppm 12.1 ppm 5.0 ppm 6.92 sampler,deep(2 ft.),15 blows with Me hammer.6'drive 6'CAB robe-te0on-lined plastic end cops,sealed with vim•1 electrical tape Electro-Plating Area EPS Sampled 5.26 r 1225;2'dram soil hoist dark brown-red sandy ela)t)•sill I ppm 14.8 ppm ND<5 ppm 5.7T sampler,shallow(I k).7 blows with 30N hammer.6'drive 6'CAB tube,te0on-tined plastic end ceps,sealed with vin)I electrical tape EPD Sampled 5.26 r:1400.2'diam wit moist dark brown-red sandy clavey silt 1 ppm 9.04 ppm 5.0 ppm 5.97 sampler.dap(2.5 tL).13 blows with 30N hammer.6'drive 6'CAB robe,tenon-lined plastic end ceps.sealed with vinyl electrical tape Rinse Area(Outside) Possible contamination during Drilled 4'hole into cracked area of sludge removal,through cracked concrete at a low point concrete RS Sampled 5.26 1245.2'diam.sort dark brown-rod very-fine-m-fine sandy 0 ppm ND<5 ppm 14.0 ppm 5.42 ppm 7-78 sampler,shallow(1 ft.),11 blows 4 silt with 300 hammer.6'dme 6'CAB tube,te0on-lined plastic end caps•sealed with vinyl electrical tape RD Sampled 5.26 @ 1410;2'than soil dark brown-reddish fine sandy silt 1.3 ppm 9.42 ppm 6.91 ppm 929 sampler,deep(2.5 k).16 blows with 30N hammer.6'drive 6'CAB tube,te0ondinad plastic end r caps,sealed with vinyl electrical tape Area: Sampling: Soil: FED TPH-DHS EPA3010 Priority Pollutant Copper Lead pH Station No. Selection,Details Drilling,Type,Samples Tests Metals (TTLC) (T rLC) Storage Area Possible mntamitntion at low point Drilled Plate through low point in (Outside) in arm from small spills or leaks concrete where drainage water sits from stored drums orehemials SIS Sampled 5.26 @ 1300:2'diam.soil dark brmvn-red clayey sand-silt 1 ppm ND<5 ppm 272 ppm 6.82 ppm 6.57 sampler,shallow(I R),7 blows with 30s hammer.6'drisro 6'CAB tube,tenon-lined plastic cad caps.scaled with vinyl electrical tape SO Sampled 5.26 Q 1350:2'diam. dark broum sandy clayey silt tppm 22.3 ppm 8.04 ppm 8.74 soil sampler,deep(3 n.).13 blows with 30a hammer,6'drive 6'CAB rube,tenon-lined phutic end aps.scaled with vim]elmrial upe 4 4J ^3� -KSLEV G Mat2a9 E»2EnE C70121 12t:i 12522 Brookliurst, Suitc I I Garden Grove, CA 92640 (714) 539-4847 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT Transchem Division of Jetronic Industries, Inc. 3767 Birch Street Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 Contact: Dave Geeke November 20, 1991 11 This survey was conducted under the guidelines of the Environmental Assessment Association for a Phase I inspection. The items reported are those observed with no physical testing being conducted at the time of the inspection. Information contained was obtained by interview and observation at the location. documents were furnished by the personnel contacted for the inspection. SITE OPERATIONS: Operations at this location consist of a printed circuit • board manufacturing process. This consist of a small plating shop, a photo lab and assembly/test area. Previously there was an injection molding shop and operation. This has been moved to another location. The vacairt area left by the removal of the molding operation left no indication of contamination of the working area. BUILDING: j The building unit is a 22, 000 square foot tilt up type concrete commercial building with a flat roof. The floor is concrete slab construction throughout. The parking and outside storage is an asphalt paved surface to the south of the building. There is some exposed dirt to the west (rear) area of the property. Also, to the west end of the parking area adjacent to the material storage area and clarifier. � 2 • 14 . r Building, Continued In the operating areas of the building, the plating operations area, there is some discoloring and stain evident by the plating tanks. This appears to be a surface stain from spilled chemical residue. There are also "oil" type stains in the area of the reflow unit by the south wall. EXTERIOR OPERATIONS: Material Storage and Pac Press: To the southwest corner of the building is the location of the Pao Press for the treatment of waste product generated by the plating operations. This unit is permitted and appears to be functioning as designed to reduce the amount of physical waste to be disposed. No stains or spill areas were noted. The units is secured and mounted over paved area of concrete. The area is diked to contain spills. This area is also used for barrel storage for materials to be disposed and manufacturing inventory of chemicals for use. The area is protected by a dike and enclosed with a cyclone fence and metal roof. There was no physical evidence of spills in the area. Material is available in the area to absorb any spills that may occur. It was stated that employees have been trained in material containment and clean up. Water Clarifier: The clarifier unit is a three stage system with 500 gallon receiving pity a 500 gallon dilution area and 500 gallon out fall tank. Test samples are monitored on a daily basis to insure compliance with local sewer requirements instituted by the County of Orange County, California. The County stated that no complaints or fines were on record as of November 21 , 1991 regarding the water entering the system from this location. i 3 • Under Ground Tank; There has been an underground sL-orage tanic on the property. The tank is on the south side of the building approximately in the center of the building and appears to have been sealed off. There are were no records available relating to the tank. Statements made were that the tank was "filled in and sealed by 'the previous tenant. " The previous company that occupied the site is the owner of the property. The operation at that time was a commercial cabinet shop. The tank was to have been a gasoline tank for the delivery trucks. The present location of the tank is covered by a concrete pad. There is one vent pipe evident at the location. There were also no filler tubes or inspection openings evident. The assumption is made that the tank was sealed and filled according to the regulations at the time it was taken out of service. Date unknown. Hazardous Materials: A listing of hazardous materials and the average amount stored at any one time is included as an appendix to this report. This is the public disclosure as sub- mitted to the Newport Beach Fire Department as required by SARA Title III. It appeared that the materials are correctly stored in the manufactures containers until needed in the manufacturing process. the physical handling of the materials observed while on the premises appeared to be done in a safe manner. Air Contaminants: The location has one vent hood system over the oil cleaner. This is an air movement unit only, no conden- sing unit or scrubber involved in the system. Air flow is for employee protection. It did not appear to be a designed hood for removal of particulates . • 4 • AREA EXPOSURES: The location is in a light industrial development. The surrounding operations are primarily light service type operations and warehousing. The area east of the location is primarily general office type buildings for profession operations. To the north is the Orange County, John Wayne Airport. This is approximately 8 city blocks to the north by north west. No property exposures were noted in the general area or surrounding areas. Recommendations: The only area of question is the present storage area for the bulk material in drums in the parking area and the open dirt area to the west of the building. These may require a Phase II survey to determine if there has been any leakage or ground contamination. The other question is the underground storage tank . A sampling of the area should determine if there was any leakage from this unit prior to being taken out of service. �\QpN M CN/;�e' ., ��t�lYd1RONAfFgrq o. QII I J. T� ' ©. tu JOfl1!^l)f•J nyN W ' RIJ) 2605to iP L NEWP0RT BEACH FIRE DEPARTME:7 :'i-.:_n 30 days to t);c llovine events, ary business shall �i -ne :1e•�gr_ Beata rlre Deaart=er.T, P.az2rdeus materials section taCt •� y' ' for an updated disclosure fora. i) chance of business address 2) Chance of business ownership -s PART I: ]) Chnce of business name <) Cessation of business omerations _ CRITERIA FOR DISCLOSUR_ - PART I-A (CHECK ONE) S) Use or handling of previously undisclosed materials 6) A sicn.f:cart ctarge in the use, antlty o ++:,, )to chemical(s) are used in any way (complete Parts I!-A and IV). tazarcus material for whits disclosure nasrbeen-previcusly made. Chemicals are used in our Comaary but do nct meet the re for disclosure (including cheaicils that re=:ire disclosure inire ean PART 1Y: SIGNATURE amounts, Completed Parts !I-A and Iv) • Z •`Y. under aenaity of p,-- f, that the above in£caatiem X Chemicals are used in our business (Complete all Parts). 1 .:e and correct to the best of my knowledge. ' PURPOSE OF DISCLOSURE - PART I-9 (CHECK ONE) _ Annual Disclosure Daw'd GcecY_ Chance in Business Name, address, or Ownerrtio ••�-•= lPiease type or prlrt) (circle one) Y Chance in quantity of previously disclosed hazardous material -'•=T^ ,_ Addition of previously undisclosed haaarccus aater:al N __rz ?eat / 9/19191 n7 iCli7i ON (E..lc) PART II: GENERAL ZNFOR 1TIO:t (CCY.PL:--- A.,:.) A CCPt OF Z::L a:7aRY DISC:;SURE FOPS4 -.cn YOUR RE_RCS BL'SINEZ5 741 :`:''-n.'t OR=G :AL :OR: TO: A 3U511tr.» / /•• _� -�: _ n�rrn 3eacn mar- .a.un4-5 ::evao:t =+-^ De �ent I ..Ifl-1..G _'-'c /_ __ _-_•• %c r �_.._• "DOrNeus r= Sivals 5ectlan Cava =ceC.rte •• --�; ,<•+ <<e: 3JD0 aewpctt Siva. :-h:::.SIRS N: .z - ?.O. Box '_766 �> dU6 Z::E55 F'r.C.:E aewpgrt Beacn, C. 92659-1766 CCNTACT NAN.E (iF 71=:E3E::7; •T__•_• - _�` n F zet=-c Ind. 200 "•--..1, ^ tia -A 'm-- ie >_ Or - _ USE -::LY: G .ASS .tm G 1E J1c66_ nCDa _PC ree'-tgnene �: r �•,cl Cc:.TAC-- ,1 la--ar nusLness :.rs7 •- --'R;r,�^— 111� sent ca. and -2 - 1 G�_+O:t SE•;_ T- -n (DA _; �• H ==3GE::cY CO•.:TAC 32 (a'tar Ou-Iness arm) 819 =6.y TS j m ?RCPcRTY L'Sa C..D—E- P=nted--_7_•t • ZZZ ]LttAnNL•s YTTCR2ILS OZSCSAStltIZ Z2N•�t'IORT T01LY PLEASE :fPE OR PLZ:IT I TOR OFFICE USE 02ryT FLOLIAL :L•,:C;.«;ta SNTORILI::OH rtEss pA:)L R'ANaSt=4�f Liz= Trade See:et eaonleals ' on a separate page • Iri.I TEA:.F. S:NIOARO L`::`5-�:.L CL1552FZCSIC:t COOL {aS2:1ES5 LGCATIC:I 3767 Ei_••di St. 1Mrf a HP.70STRzz- :Pmmn On-732_11 P4 I (2)• ] ] a ^L`.CE OR C:=011 H.1HE wA� .( ) j(5) �(5) '.AX I](S) �(9) jI70) i(12) T.L10E ARO:COT 77 C:.5 i (IO:J a;�-:-y ,Ay?•;L1T32TL USED FOR SAC:SIC:f {ACCUOE '.IIT.:9= rHYS iC:.L'HEhLTH g5:oRAC. G'.C_C`.L ::"'- OR 8L`:^.'RE CCNPO:2E:1T5•SECRET'T_,55 IO J CREOS�0:7 SITE A2 OF HATERIAL DAILY ?:OF *•_5'S:`S7 iHAAAROS T.:HLE 'LT :G:.ZRSAL SAFE_Y DATA SHEETS 9 HLz- )see J.S.e T\eLE yy A21y T_.._ � �IF MATERIAL � � Y ] qi1 - )List Last :i y t..e 7 La sr.-_0x S=Z:-.A2LZ 131TABLEE S447RESSV: Y I yl a 6 ::eauL'=-acz.^'1 in tia5se E+a2. Storage vss I 32e bldg. 1 ll0 Cal I 365 1 4 4,5 1 1 5 I - 11310733 330 Cal ceaL�nc t 2 �t 'a'=' St=•O ' 1117621 IC'r I I I14145ZI 6 I 55 W pl I Ste li•.g of dry f:0-M I I I 1 � : •.� _ 5 f_^aH t�-nsci e_-rsiss Yaz. Stosaoe inside h]dc. 55 Cal 365 j 4 4,5 •'e-===�==t "c- '-- I 5 1790�7664393 6 I 55 Cal I Flee-raless plating of I I I 1 I pr--nted c=�:s Ya. Storage inside bldg. 55 Ca1 365 4 I 4.5 1183017664939 6 I 5 91 Clernan oefc_ zze_=I2 �C1 I 5 ( plate of. prated c==cut Paz. Storage anSade bid=. I 55 Cal I 365 4 I 4 90a512'2!02S EtC:a4 of corer cn 5 267211336216E 6 i40 Gal I m c-=-:s I Yaz. Stcraae inside bide. I 440 Gal i 365 4 I 4.5 9084:5068751 I �-" ,III •. __ _ 6975721 Sts=p_.= Saidc: C:I __ _ _ t I g I Ir I 6 I 55 Cal I pr_.ted c_c-ss I Pax. Ste-age LIS de old= I 155 Cal I 365 i I 4,5 Ir _u3l bi01015 I 55 Cl Str:p_g sr SraaIr_c Ulul Pa _ St - a sie bi = 55 C b5 i :.5_ =' 7 c__. t__.._. 1 11050!62566 I 6 S5 Cal =cat_.g soicer ?late i •ci .....__ I i li. - I I cn cr=.rea c•=.::rs I Pas. Stcx.oe _2•sade old=. 1 SS Cal I '_55 S I 4.5 i Ic:• I 1198 50000 I l1i cL C `^n a Fi. Stc_.^_ee sate cl?a. I 'S Cal 35_ i I 4,5 ltl ^:1 • 5 Cn1 'z�- I• __I 6 55 Gan' Zlect-less tlat_.g of ! - 1 ^ I -_.:� ____ tar. Stezge _Sate old_. - ` .5 Cal ___ 3 I 4,5 CxPILTI::C .HIS TOM. ':SZ aUHEEAS F°Oil -1Z 30V-ZWTHG -AeLESi -Ae= 11 :a:Aan C..;.SS ,Calsu= :ATZRIAIZ SAFET'f :=A SHEZT2 .1s].t 12 HCn STC7= IL1st .1 t=at 3pplyt -ABLE 13 - ;;:1arz N - - AND -TABLE IS STCA.:GE i STATE =EAL:s rl.:..ACS a PRESS'RE 1. a/azii=a tae=r 1. Fla==aele Lil:a+d /7. Paiscn A 3. Unaeretcund -arx 7. Carrcylst r 1. Pure i A=eaene Preszur 2. b:e:ne'=i (Feiznn 2. Ataveat-und -ane ]. Glass Z. Mix 1. FSre Greater an Am t '. Fla_3ale 5elaa 1 _ ( •- ...•>•enzz:=.e L!"Id 13- Hvptr==L:= G_LrtsSed cam 1 1 ]. Fixea Pressur:=ea Ccntaarertsi ]. Se lad ( 2. Suceen Peiesse I Pressure 4. :rtaeen=z - Crane :2. :Caren 3 0:1ac0ern o, Hoxresl at Pressure 3. Less than Aat1e Crr_=si:•e �reeor_ its.: +. �aaarala :sent =• :ton-Fl]--,,LC (Eva_=:_.ta•�2 I •- �==ia Preszur:=ed :0. =3alst A. +=_a 1 : Reae__v._: Pressure Emaea+-e A C__nr:ssea cal ._ ry.__._.__ __ , 1 C:..-cers ._ Mataa !recce_ _31.: caea:ace =l 1 7-PZ-,..=C .6. Oraanie Perex+ee Scent==e=usly H I:aulated -anx Te=ta+tera as `-- 7taaytd _a ;a. Annsenc -e=u[a Za�usr:e C Ox+___er Ce Cusc:rle I t:❑e___e t xenicm (a=e ____s1 I (recur_ .a.._..•. ._. creator rtan Ae Pest:aace ._. RauzzActa+a 1 5. ===tad =t -arr:+l Si -.am er3tare lo. Slav=3eae : t =:is Sed Cal 1 I is. Lea$ ::.an A=eili r4caeniC Cana] 112 ISS S:ACARCCDi lLITERSALS DL^CLOSURE ZmzsTORY FORM § 'FOR CFFICE US£ O::L'I Pf r:4v T'ipt OR PRI:^ �a l §FEDLiIL LA p=FCRT2.^.0 SUTCOY_1:2C:§ 'IP'-' Cl':E '-'""� `'=• Llo: aaca Ste:a: encaieals ! i 'M •• i::: _ 36' an a seprato Pact o i 9 STA!.D:A,L^ I:::2.^::.i CLSG:FIG•SC:1 CJ::£ -- CSIRESS L-C.:-:^_:i 3761 9i-1 St, 2 3 1 ,SU:1 i E 00-227-7184 .1 . v DS:E7ET —::SER l . C:E; _GA ,%%Z OR:: _ -- _ :T7.OE-SHn ARC•CDT ACAS 1 3i0'A ±a?:I::^.7 ,(21 •' =:.iAL L' �^. FCR 9(31 11C1 'fl�l ,-,I) ills) 1(1:) CC:IM::EL U;S_CRE..CL:S_ . O C:r - eLCC JC _ _.,AGE +IRT.3ER 'PRFSICAL..E,:-v :S-ORAA:2:NSCLT rd-ZRI AL SA:_•i C.AT:n SREETS _ 4 --: Oa S:Tc A ! ]OF .X.E.1AL • `^` •T -•-- ar;A:fig .- .'J'iTAaLc ;See _Sea 6TAaLE^i 11Y ::8= : I •- ^•�:C• L:A_S 91l !Lii List !:2 •�� 1 �I:t FAC:L:'i ]-.I SI-_ �C:: S:T�'T.AES= S]:. s. :aREESDF Za RG?IOM1I OL sb1CGr p2re I an pr:ared e_=.Ilts I FImneble Stcraoe I 55 Ca'I 365 i 4 I 1 1 2 1 Fu se O y1 refn3val z•ld } 11 11219�67630 I 6 55 G� clean °z PrInt d Flammable St_race 55 C11, 365 4 I 1.4 i_:ers ' =:°� I 5 I I I 6 ( 55 Ca_ I Clea,•t_.g silk semis I Ha- stcax inside bldg. 55 Ca.SI 365 i 4 I 5- r IT•+ m_rer- _. •• i _u is tv. 1 1 11 L'071133020T 6 I 55 Gal I Cleatl^.a silk::: screens I Flamv.D1G Sterax 55 Ca! 365 4 I 1,4,5i(:1 ..._----------.,. I 11294 11OBBS3 I 11 I 5 I^t 12831 71556 I 6 11 55 fa i Cleaning -ee^._.e parts I F1I =mle St=age I 55 Cal 365 .1 I 1 _ +1 -993 fi I 55 Gil _ pa_.T t.--rer I F]a-rt§nle Si°raae � 55 Cail 365 4 I 1 I :..-__a i li I .193 I73933 i 6 Cal C1ea•tyna ^ I 1 iI ca enrs I F+smn•tle S[c--ace I 55 Call 365 4 1901f,4591 6 I) 55 Cri i•g c: sbicer plate I _ _ �C• _ ___ _ _ I I I Ca �..:eD C_== Hat. St•_2x rside bide. I 55 Gail ' I 5 ] I� I I I it I I I I. I I • -::P--�T:::G T•.l_•S iORR. USE HUHOERS FRCS THE FOI.ZUING TABLE^a: TAa� IS FA:ARC CZASS IR::ISULT MATERIALS SAFETY CATA SHEET) TABLE Ix HOW 5TCREO (Llsc all =ac applh TAELE 13 ?HYSICAL' :TABLE /4 pmys: :. All° ITAaLL IS STCPAGE + 9lastyna Aoent STATE HEAL:: ::A:ARCS PRESSURE 11. Flammable Ligtt•! 19. Poison A 1. Under_rtuntl :anY.:, Carryntae•t 7. Class, s) 1• Pure 1. Ancient Pressor, ^--tstyCle :icayd -" vlaamacle So1yd (POysen 2. Atovee-ana Tanx a. G.asz '!yx 1. Fire 2. Greater taan Aa A3. vpercaiz= Csmcressed Gast 3, F,xez r_essu:yted Container a. aenics (s) ]. Solid 2. SOCsen Release Pttzsu:e _. t r:tsive la. lr_:ant 20. poison 0 Cvlyaae_-s 9. Baxl esi (retort Ls.) of ^rrezzure 3. Less tnan Ambzt s. __ Is. "On-Flammable (Sol.:d/L:-_�1 a, Pc,_Lcle Pressur:ted 'a• 3aalsl a. •^•aid 3. Reaczw.ty Pressure '^^-air Acent Comoressea casZrCply:sers U. Metal a, ecyate •ae_.e+ TE.'•!F_-:.T:'RC cxracsi•+e A -_, ?y,__ne:__ t_ lrepor: gal.) 3. EiC:tsive 3 16. Orcanie petoxice Seontaneausly -• :nsulatetl Tank Ccatainers S. as S. Delayed (carts:rl 14. Armient Teaoers 1-,. Oxiai:er CcZoust:tie lyttcytaa tr•:CCenic= 1 (rate^ �.:.) IS. Greater tian Al i. Ex_aczavl : 'S. esz-Clc 5. Craats or Sarreil5) (nat cruets :C. Flae=cola Ct=mreszeG Cas a =3• Raoieactyve 1 ) I Less.-atCrt '+6. Lass enan Amnml i. Cr•:CaanyC CCnal Y Permits and Licenses B• P. A. Identifier: CAD 044338945 South Coast Air Quality District: Permit #%005562 (I. D. ) 027645 (Operations Permit) Laminator Permit # D33316 Orange County Sanitation District: Permit # 7-1-259 Not to exceed .61 pounds per day Not to exceed .40 4 day average City of Newport Beach Business License• 01928 `• x TO: Jay Garcia FROM: Aziz Aslami SUBJECT: Traffic Stuff No 83 (Use Permit No. 3457) Traffic Impact Analysis The proposed use of an automobile repair in conjunction with a car wash facility would generate a significantly higher traffic volume than the light industrial use. Therefore, a traffic study was required to determine the compatibility of the proposed project under the guidelines of the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance. A Traffic Study has been prepared for the proposed project in conformance with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance and City Council Policy S-1 to examine the consistency and conformity of the project with the City's Circulation Element. The City Traffic Engineer identified eleven (11) intersections which could be affected by the project at full occupancy as follows: 1. Jamboree Road at MacArthur Boulevard 2. Jamboree Road at Birch Street 3. Jamboree Road at Campus Drive 4. Campus Drive at MacArthur Boulevard 5. Birch Street at MacArthur Boulevard 6. Bristol Street North at Jamboree Road 7. Bristol Street North at Campus Drive 8. Bristol Street North at Birch Street 9. Bristol Street South at Jamboree Road 10. Bristol Street South at Irvine Avenue 11. Bristol Street South at Birch Street The first step in evaluating intersection capacity is to conduct a 1%traffic volume analysis, taking into consideration existing traffic, regional growth, and committed projects' traffic. For any intersection where, on any approach leg, project traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of the projected peak 2-1/2 hour volume in either the morning or afternoon, Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) analysis would be required. The estimated average daily project traffic generation is as follows: Land Use Vehicles Per Day Car Repair (Project) 75 Car Wash (Project) 300 Employees (Project) 47 Total 422 Credit For Existing Land Use 105 Credit For Internal Car Wash Per Day 20 Total Credit 125 Project's Estimated Net Trip Generation: 422 - 125 = 297 Vehicle Per Day The net estimated 297 trip ends per day represent 16(4 in and 12 out) trip ends during a.m. peak periods and 40(20 in and 20 out) trip ends during p.m. peak traffic hours. The 1% volume test conducted at the eleven study intersections indicated that the traffic increase at each intersection leg from the proposed project was less than 1% of the projected 21/2 hour peak volume at all intersections evaluated. Therefore,no Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) calculation or any further analysis is required. Presently, significant traffic backing southbound on Birch street at North Bristol Street occurs during p.m. peak period. In order to minimise the undesired traffic situations on Birch Street,the project would be required to provide sufficient signage,pavement markings and other directional signs, at the driveway of the site to prohibit the project's outbound traffic from going northbound on Birch Street. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT September 10, 1992 TO: Bill Laycock, Current Planning Manager John Douglas, Principal Planner Rich Edmonston, Traffic Engineer FROM: Jim Hewicker, Planning Director&(— SUBJECT: Use Permit for Superformance - 3767 Birch Street I have been asked by the City Manager that we take whatever steps we possibly can to expedite the completion of the required traffic study and the processing of the Use Permit for Geoff Hirson,so he can reestablish his business in Newport Beach. Apparently,we have had some difficulty in getting information to the traffic consultant for the completion of the traffic study and have run into a glitch regarding the calculation of Fair Share Fees. Your efforts in expediting a resolution to the problem is appreciated. Please keep Mr. Hirson informed. He may be contacted at 966-0999. 3 '92 16: 1234 TRICO REALTY, INC. TEL 1-714-540-4579 P. 1 Clarence J. Turner September 2, 1992 Mr. Kevin Murphy, City Manager City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 RE: Conditional Use Permit Application By Superformance To Occupy the Premises at 3767 Birch Street Dear Kevin: I had a call from a potential Newport Beach business man who wishes to relocate his business in the City and more specifically at 3767 Birch Street. He was, and is, a bit frustrated with the City's response to his application. Under our regulations, a Conditional Use Permit will be required. He made that application on July 24, 1992, and paid the nearly $1,000.00 necessary to commence that process. On July 30, 1992, he was informed that a traffic study would be required and that it would take a week to 10 days to secure the bids to have that work done. On August 24, 1992, he contacted the Traffic Department and was informed that they had 1 bid of $7,000.00 and that the City would charge 10% for a total cost of $7,700.00 if he wanted to proceed without competitive bidding. He elected to do that, paid his $7,700.00 and asked the City to proceed. On August 31, 1992 , he, called the vendor and asked how he was doing with the study. The vendor informed him that he was unable to proceed because of a lack of direction form the City. He also confirmed that it would probably take 3 to 4 weeks to complete the study once he gets all the information from the City. Apparently the reason for the delay is that the Traffic Engineer was gone for 10 days and no one else could provide the information. His frustrations escalated even further when he was informed that he would probably have to pay Fair Share Fees which could amount to some $70,000.00. He does understand that the amount could be reduced because of credits attributable to the previous occupancy. Nonetheless it is an open question and no one seems to be able to give him some clear cut direction on this iiem. In addition to the above, he has paid a fee of $303.00 for a Negative Declaration, $3,000.00 for architectural fees, $3,000.00 for legal fees, and $10,000.00 for an Option on the Property which expires on October 1, 1992. Unless he has a benevolent landlord, and there are very few like that, he will have to pony up another $10,000.00 to extend the Option through October and maybe even a like amount to get it extended through November. i , 26 20 1234 TRICW-ALTY, INC. TEL 1-714-540579 P. 2 A. A Page Two Mr. Kevin Murphy September 2, 1992 As I See it, he will not be before the Planning Commission before the first meeting in October at the very best. Should the Council wish to review the application, then that could constitute another month's delay. Assuming a positive response from the Planning commission and the Council, he would then feel comfortable in turning his architect loose to complete the plans and to secure Building Permits which of course will be followed by construction, The latter two items could easily take another 60-90 days before he can commence business and will undoubtedly cost him another $20,000.00 for Option Money on the premises. The point of all of this is to demonstrate how expensive it is to get into business. Because I strongly believe that the City needs to do its share to assist these people by expediting our paperwork, I am requesting that the appropriate departments respond to this situation immediately to at least keep the costs down from our end to a very minimum. S*c y o C� r as J. yor Pr m b yq c City of ort Beach b 6 cc: Geoff Hirson, Super£ormance lll� 2950 Airway Avenue, #A-5 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 ma p Mohle,Grover&Associates CITY PLAOF NE DEPARTiWiF, ; NEIJPORT REACH August 24, 1992 AIH AUG 2 G 1992 7i$i9110111i121112131g15 a Mr. John Douglas Principal Planner City of Newport Beach Planning Department 330 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658 RE: Traffic Impact Study for an Automobile and Car Wash Facility, Birch Street, City of Newport Beach Dear Mr. Douglas: We truly appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal for a traffic study in response to your Request for Proposal for the subject project. We met with the developer and discussed the project in detail at our office. In addi- tion, we obtained a copy of the site plan to check traffic circulation both off-site and on-site. Mr. Rich Edmonston, the City's Traffic Engineer, has identified ten study intersec- tions for Level of Service (LOS) analysis. The names of the intersections and perti- nent data for LOS analysis will be given to us prior to the commencement of the study. He has also suggested that we conduct a "trip generation" study at the current developer's facility in Costa Mesa to estimate trip rates for the proposed project. We will obtain all data required from the City to conduct the study. We will conduct the trip generation study in consultation with the City Traffic Engineer. The study will be completed per City guidelines. Previously, we have successfully completed several important traffic studies for the City. PROJECT MANAGEMENT The entire study will be conducted by the undersigned. Mr. Henry R. Mohle, P.E. will be the Project Advisor for this project. PROJECT SCHEDULE Upon notification to proceed, we are prepared to commence work immediately, and the study could be completed within a three week period. MUNICIPAL AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS 901 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite A, La Habra, CA 90631 (714)738-3471 FAX (714)738-7802 W August 24, 1992 Mr. John Douglas Page 2 PROJECT FEE Based on our previous studies for the City, we propose a fee of $7,000.00 for the entire project. The fee includes traffic counts for the trip generation study. We would renegotiate the proposed fees to provide additional services for specific mitigation measures (if any) due to the proposed development. If you have any questions, please give me a call. We look forward to completing the study to the City's satisfaction. Respectfully submitted, MOHLE, GROVER &ASSOCIATES n J ' pua.,ww;.,; �,,1,. M �� Dr. N. Murthy Transportation Planner/Project Manager NM/lmw fin:douglas.pro SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1992 Principal $ 140.00 Associate $ 110.00 Vice President/Senior Engineer $ 110.00 Director of Project Development $ 110.00 Resident Engineer $ 90.00 Senior Design Engineer $ 85.00 Senior Transportation Engineer $ 80.00 Construction Inspector $ 75.00 Assistant Engineer $ 65.00 Transportation Engineer $ 65.00 Designer $ 60.00 Systems Analyst $ 50.00 Assistant Transportation Engineer $ 55.00 Senior CADD Operator $ 45.00 Administrative Secretary $ 45.00 Engineering Technician II $ 45.00 CADD Operator $ 40.00' Clerical/Engineering Technician I $ 40.00 Traffic Enumerator/Engineering Aide $ 35.00 Expert Witness - Principal $ 200.00 Expert Witness - Vice President $ 150.00 Subconsultants will be billed at cost plus 12% Conditions of Usage. The above rates are typically effective far a 12 month period, but MGA maintains the right to change the billing rates at any time for convenience of record keeping. Therefore, all billings will always be at the then current billing rates. This will not affect arty agreed upon total or not-to-exceed fees. INVOICES WILL BE SUBMITTED MONTHLY AND SHALL BE DUE AND PAYABLE WITHIN 30 DAYS. A MONTHLY FINANCE CHARGE OF 1.5% SHALL BE CHARGED ON UNPAID BALANCES. O�SEW PO,q cmn CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ~ \ ? P.O.BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92659.1768 3 °•+<�FoaN�r FAX COVER SHEET // 2',Y r DATE: TO: BUSINESS PHONE: , FAX NUMBER: RE: THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT IS FROM: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92663 PHONE NO. : (714) 6¢4-3225 FAX NO. : (714)644-3250 NO. OF PAGES: c f— c-oy e-f SPECIAL V INSTRUCTIONS: �i 1 Aor XLr asq�• TT 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach MOHLE ,GROVER & ASSOC ID :714-738-7802 HUG 24192 13 :54 No .002 P .02 M GO" mohle,Grover& Associates August 24, 1992 Mr. John Douglas Principal Planner City of Newport Beach Planning Department 330 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658 RE: Traffic Impact Study for an Automobile and Car Wash Facility, Birch Street, City of Newport Beach Dear Mr. Douglas: We truly appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal for a traffic study in response to your Request for Proposal for the subject project. We met with the developer and discussed the project in detail at our office. In addi- tion, we obtained a copy of the site plan to check traffic circulation both off-site and on-site. Mr, Rich Edmonston, the City's Traffic Engineer, has identified ten study intersec- tions for Level of Service (I OS) analysis, The names of the intersections and perti- nent data for LOS analysis will be given to us prior to the commencement of the study. He has also suggested that we conduct a "trip generation" study at the current developer's facility in Costa Mesa to estimate trip rates for the proposed project. We will obtain all data required from the City to conduct the study, We will conduct the trip generation study in consultation with the City Traffic Engineer. The study will be completed per City guidelines. Previously, we have successfully completed several Important traffic studies for the City, PROJECT MANAGEMENT The entire study will be conducted by the undersigned. Mr. Henry R. Mohle, P.E. will be the Project Advisor for this project. PROJECT SCHEDULE Upon notification to proceed, we are prepared to commence work immediately, and the study could be completed within a ht ree week period. MUNICIPAL AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS 901 E. imperial Hwy., Sulte A, La Habia, CA 90631 (714)738-8471 FAX (714)738-7802 MOHLE ,GROVER & ASSOC ID :714-738-7802 RUG 24192 13 :54 No .002 P .03 August 24, 1992 Mr. John Douglas Page 2 PROJECT FEE Based on our previous studies for the City, we propose a fee of $7,000.00 for the entire project. The fee in 1 es traffic counts for the trip generation study. We would renepotiate the proposed fees to provide additional services for specific mitigation measures tit any) dud to the proposed development. If you have any questions, please give me, a call. We. look forward to completing the study to the City's satisfaction. Respectfully submitted, MOHLE,, GROVER & ASSOCIATES R- . /l/a.ir ,,,/,,. Dr, N. Murthy Transportation Planner/Project Manager NM/lmw fin:dougias.pro Approved: � '� Date: Douglas, CP Pr' ipa1 Planner ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION F0 City of Newport Beach Planning Department t 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA 92663 (714) 644-3225 / A. General Information / GMT Ad5M) 16\o a � 1. Applicant/Agent: , IAP F9Xt1ANC� C' oSTA RX-g �'u4' Phone. .r - 9 (.16 0999 Address �C�SO Ac�u�y gar� tk�FS CoST4 MEJA CA926�6. 2. Property owner: M T. F}OQAa CPag(hzE--T Co Phone: Address: 2 9,91 SK-) LA".--. Aie I-*L-E Clr7 :-(7zh B. Project Description Please attach the following materials for the project: • Vicinity map • Plans drawn to scale • Proposed revisions to zoning map • At least 3 different site photos mounted and text using underline and on 8 1/2 X 11 cardboard with a key map stri4ces4t• notation, if applicable showing the photo locations and direction of view 1. Project name: �U4F2�o2J tA1�E tyedA INC. 2. Project location: 3a ba 13t�G1 S� ct18pQt Sect: 3. Assessor's parcel #: L�Z4' - 4. Permit application 5a. Proposed use: 4-(TO Seaylcc " 4b cater 5b. Project size (dwelling units, gross floor area, etc. ) -5 a1 5c. site size: I . ) 'n !EC e:±S 5d. Building height: 49 F :wXAPQ ��1`b 6. Existing land use designations: General Plan: Zoning: Specific Plan: LCP• 7. Previous governmental approvals- S. Other governmental approvals required: Federal: State: Regional: Local: 9. Begin constructions Estimated occupancy" 5^ A0004t, ., Apwl'r , (date) (date) ASA-P- 17 C. pot *: l Environmental Effects dG on a separate page, please provide the following information. �10,the�Gquestio. is not applicable, indicate "Not applicable" or "None". Lfi o 1. Earth �� Please describe the earthwork that will be required for the projects Include grading quantities, and the location of borrow or stockpile Bites, and 1 routes, if applicable. Describe any geotechnical or soils investigations Wt have been conducted. Include exhibits showing existing and proposed topography, retaining walls, and erosion control devices. 2. Air_ Describe any air emissions or odors that could result from the project, including emissions during construction, and any measures that are proposed to reduce these emissions. 3. Water Describe existing and proposed site drainage, and measures that will be employed to reduce erosion and prevent contaminated runoff from entering the storm drain system, groundwater or surface water. Describe any changes that could occur in groundwater levels or bodies of surface water. is the project located in a flood hazard zone? 4. Biological Resources Describe the existing vegetation on the site, and any trees or large shrubs that are to be removed. Identify any fish or wildlife that inhabit the site. 5. Noise Describe any sources of noise that impact the site, and any noise-generating equipmelit that will be utilized on the property, either during construction or after occupanc�. What means to reduce noise impacts on surrounding properties or building occupants are proposed? 6. Lieht and Glare Describe exterior lighting that is proposed for the project and means that will be utilized to reduce light and glare impacts on surrounding properties. 7. Land Use Describe: a) the existing land uses and structures on the project site and on adjacent parcels; b) the project's conformance with existing land use plans and regulations for the property; and c) its compatibility with surrounding land uses. 8. Public Health and- Safety Identify any aspects of the project that could present a risk to public health due to normal operations, or due to an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or spill. Is there any possibility that the site could be contaminated due to previous uses or dumping? If so, what measures are proposed to eliminate the hazard or contamination? 9. Pooulation/Housing/Employment a. If the project is residential, please explain how the project will comply with the affordable housing policies contained in the Housing Element of the General Plan, and the average household size expected. b. If the project is commercial, industrial, or institutional,, please identify the tenants and/or uses and the estimated number of employees. 10. Transportation/Circulation/Parkipp_ Please describe how the project will comply with parking regulations, and identify any Changes or improvements to the circulation system that are proposed as part of the project. 11. Public Services/Utilities Please identify whether adequate capacity currently exists for the following public services and utilities. If expansion is needed, explain how it will be accomplished. Please attach any written confirmation of capacity you have received from service providers. • Communications Systems Electrical power • Fire protection Natural gas • Parks/recreational facilities Police protection • Schools Sewer systems or septic tanks • Solid waste and disposal • Storm water drainage systems 12. Aesthetics Describe, whether the project could potentially obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the .public, or create an aesthetically offensive site open to public view. Could the project block any private views? 13. Cultural and Historic Resources Please'identify any known archaeological or paleontological resources that exist on the site. Would the project result in any adverse physical or aesthetic effects to any building, structure, or object having historical, cultural, or religious significance? Certification I certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits are correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I am the legal owner of the pEqRerty thnt. _ is the subject of this application or have been-authorized by the-owner to act on his behalf - regarding this application. ge I further acknowled that any a se statements or information presented herein may result in the revocation of any approval or permit granted on the basis of this information. c" AA \ Print name of owner or representative S gnal!e Date aeev___e-v___e___m__e_mevem___eav__o..e__eve_e—vme--eve-eme_s—mm-v_mvee-------evd�_ed Date filed: Fee: Receipt No: By: f:\...\JD\FORMS\ENV-INFO. ev. 12/91 s PURPOSE OF APPLICATION FOR SUPERFORMANCE COSTA MESA INC. It is proposed that the existing building located at 3767 Birch St. , Newport Beach, described as Lot 55 and I Southwest Portion of Lot 54 of Tract #3201 , recorded in book 130 pages 25-30, will be used for the service and repair of Mercedes Benz, Bmw, and Porsche automobiles. All work is to be done inside of the building in designated work areas with ample space for the parking of work completed or in progress. There will be 14 work bays, 7 with above ground hoists that are bolt down type installation. 1 bay area will be used for detailing. The hand wash is located inside of -the building. All drainage is connected to the existing clarifier and a recycling syst6n will be installed to reduce water and sewage usage. The car wash requires 3 to 5 gallons of fresh water for the final rinse of the automobile. The existing clarifier is a three stage system with 500 gallon receiving pit, a 500 gallon dilution area and a 500 gallon out-fall tank to which a pump and a sand filter will be connected and 95% of the wash is them done with recycled water. The volume of cars washed will be approximately 20 cars per day from our service department spread over the 8 hour day. These cars will be washed and then parked in a parking space, waiting for the respective customers to pick up their serviced automobiles. An additional approximate six cars per hour will be washed for our customers that do not have their cars in for service at our service department. Serviced cars will be parked and returned to the customers by an attendant. A waiting and reception area is provided to the customer. July 22, 1992 City of Newport Beach Planning Department P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Gentlemen, As the holder of the long—term ground lease (over 30 years remaining), and owner of the leasehold Improvements on the property located at 3767 Birch Street, Newport Beach, CA, I authorize my agent, Jon McLean of DAUM Commercial Real Estate, to sign on my behalf for the application of a Conditional Use Permit by Geoff Hirson of Superformance Costa Mesa, Inc. Sincerely, M. J. Hogan Cabinet Co. by: 14 371 9602 TRR145CHEII 01 • 0 � I DIVISION OF USTRIESINC. PRINTED CIRCUITS 110Sr.1M nN1AY AO-ADDRESS" ELECTRONIC POWER SUPPLIES 0767 Birch Street• Newport Beach,California 92660 P.O. ADX 667 1521 Pomona Road• Corona,California 01720 (714)952.8544 00AONA, CA 91718-0661 1714)971-5761 July 24 , 1992 Mr . Jon McLean 1i Daum Rea I ty 30 Executive Park Ste . ??0 Irvine , CA 92714 FAX p 714 474 - 1771 Dear Jon : During the years that Tianschem oceup led the building at 3767 Birch Strcct , Newport Beach , employment level varied considerably . My best estimate is that the average number of erupluyees dufIng this period would approximate 70 persons . Very truly yours , Garth E. Bower , VP jvlvf 'j +vv"k to-do i 1 r, 11511 I ; i I I QUAIL STREET — j ! I DETAIL r I PARTS. I j 14j SERVICE BAYS L I STORAGE_ 'I EXISTING BUILDING _ 1 -4o -- I W � 2g0 - � — > 3� z - - - - _ - -- -- - - — ; i i x I > N f �Lu ! I o E li I F _1C I W � U , 36 PARKING HAND CAR WASH ' .. �-- -------... -- --- — RECEPTION . rn _ -41 y i ( cc --- 754c3 �7 �� 51 53 S5 �, 7 5l !. I d2 ; &'5 Coo ` l�7 Cods G� ' PATIO Ex1�'*'.INcq �14 etw 48 �O 5 2 ; 4 5 !v �3 ` &0 c>✓ ; =1t=g, LAN DSG t"� 0 BRISTOL STREET: � f CUSTOMIRR PARKING 3l DRT'Q STALLS U �o �o f B t�(P. _ - -- ,r- �, 7S FREEWAY 30 � � SERVICE ATTENDANT PARKINGro` ' 'j _ I - T - 1 Q _ 29 28 2'7 -Z& 2g 24 23 22 21 I 20 M i8 17 Iw 15 i3 I2 II la 9 8 7 Ca 4 3 2 I 1 U. ul i ' `>t®'�'T"Y LIt JE. I �'-o` I 1 I I � I I it F 2Qic7 - � • I I -SIT-9 PLAN. AREA - M-A P I I % SAN DIM FMY NR 4f r, TABULATION a R �.I�-• i �«w � I !w I.s ♦ I r I /�- }��-1T� g��-J b -+� t O P 7 CI/D �� • 5 7 4' 7 Ml rr-- 4 - ."7M 1 ., UMIVERSITY� .. fi'>1-•l l L-01hl 2. I 0C<� �, �. THOU,$ GUIDE: ass-� J 1..1 �a AUTO l Z7T tJ '� 5 5 p.N 0 45,\k% %2 0� LOT t-1 = 5 4 l Ord s F Q f= �r 4OF TZAQCGT N 3 2c 1 A '5 N c-DW N I N AdS �S�- 6AM vl/.•&.csN sT .LL �r I t t.:� ,t i'"'�c i� 2 ? F'r 1 . I , c a u N-r°�ca c ►.r�Ct � aj TA Lt�� < 1J I Z;ff ) fi mz--,' i r..: 3767 Bias h � t �. Neva icy ti'T3�e bh Z ! k.''( L, h t� om ( 14 ) 9 (2G -- 04399 (7714 -cadp0 Of I ( DETAIL. I N ! {�otsT t �Ot�T f dot 40I-s-r G �N l�C�i�T N ! ` �� 4- i� I — — — -- — —" — — --- — — — --"— -- — — — — — -- — — — -- -- — -- — — ---- — — ------ — —----- — - — -- —--- --- — , i P �Aa V I SERVICE BAYS $ ' O.13AGE; 1 j U ! Q , ..OFFICE i ! H ND A. CAR WASH ( i I RECEPTION !✓fit !-r >✓N _F �. I -- — SITi W M EX f T � —n, pa,e.t-�-'l FL00.R :PLAK r,teva o�z I�At7 tzr�R O // T!I_T I1F' Cif lC.t��it G Ir a1�11"�LS 7- 1 jc-/ S O U T.1 : D LL P=j WEST EAST: / -rILT LlTom' CC>NC E.T 1�4 a1rs cA 1 _ tr �/ NOWT p;yN Hwy