Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTS097 ;' ---`7Co140,'3SSIONERS MINUTES ' A 0 �t�`'P�o Poo CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 23, 1994 ROLL CALL INDEX 17. That this use per expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of ap specified in Section 20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Mun de. A. Traffic Study No. 97 Public Hearin item No. Request to approve a traffic study for a proposed automobile Ts 97 rental facility. UP3530 AND B. Use Permit No. 3530 Public Hearin Request to permit the establishment of an automobile rental facility which includes a car washing and maintenance facility and underground fuel facilities on property located in the M-1-A District. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow a monument sign and an electric guard gate to encroach into the required 15 foot front yard setback. LOCATION: Lots 25 and 26, Tract No. 3201, located at 4242-4262 Campus Drive, on the southeasterly side of Campus Drive,between Dove Street and MacArthur Boulevard, across from the John Wayne Airport. ZONE: M-1-A APPLICANT: Nogle Onufer Associates Architects,Inc.,San Diego OWNER: The Shattuck Family Trust, Newport Beach James Hewicker, Planning Director, referred to Condition No. 28, Exhibit "A", requesting a Lot Line Adjustment, whereby he suggested that a Covenant be required so as to hold the two -16. COA MISSIONERS , MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 23, 1994 ROLL CALL L INDEX parcels as a single building site as long as the properties are being used together, for the duration of the use on the site. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. Jerry King, 979 Sandcastle Drive, appeared before the Planning Commission on behalf of the applicant. He concurred that amended Condition No. 28 not require a Lot Line Adjustment, and that the applicant be allowed to apply for a waiver of a parcel map. He concurred with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A". Mr. Hewicker explained that by replacing the Lot Line Adjustment with a waiver to a parcel map would require the applicant to come back to the Planning Commission. He recommends a Covenant to hold the two lots together for the duration of the use of the property, and it would not require the applicant to come back to the Planning Commission. Mr. King concurred with the recommendation. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. Motion Motion was made to approve Use Permit No. 3530 subject to the All ayes findings and conditions in Exhibit "A", and to modify Condition No. 28 as previously stated. Commissioner Edwards supported the motion; however, he supports the CC&R only because the applicant's representative consented to the amendment. Motion was voted on, MOTION CARRIED. A. TRAFFIC STUDY NO 97: Approve the Traffic Study, making the findings listed below: FINDINGS: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the peak-hour traffic and -17- I COMMISSIONERS . • MINUTES �ioAo 0 G��F�o `t��QoyPog10 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 23, 1994 ROLL CALL INDEX circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project-generated traffic will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any 'major,' 'primary-modified,' or 'primary' street. 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project-generated traffic will not be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on seven of the eight study intersections and that the ICU analysis for the intersection of Campus Drive/Dove Street, indicates that the ICU values for the A.M. and P.M. peaks will not be altered by the addition of the project. B. USE PERMIT NO. 3530 FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed application is support service in nature and as such,is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. That adequate parking will exist on-site for the proposed development. 3. That the proposed project will not have any significant environmental impact and that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act under Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). 4. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed development. -18- ,COMMISSIONERS • MINUTES 00 �n��Alcf.�" �. ��q�o � �°Qo�Poo CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 23, 1994 ROLL CALL INDEX 5. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 20.80.060 of the Municipal Code. 6. That the proposed modification to the Newport Beach Municipal Code so as to allow the proposed monument sign and electric guard gate to encroach into the required 15 foot front yard setback will not,under the circumstances of this case be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City, and further that the proposed modification is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of the Municipal Code. 7. That the approval of Use Permit No. 3530 will not, under the circumstances of this case,be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. CONDITIONS: 1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plan and elevations, except as noted below. 2. That all mechanical equipment, trash areas and vehicle storage areas shall be screened from Campus 'Drive and adjoining properties. The proposed block wall adjacent to the Campus Drive frontage shall be a minimum 6 feet high and shall be set back a minimum 15 feet from the front property line. 3. That all automobile repairs shall be conducted within the building and no outdoor display of vehicles for sale shall be permitted. -19- COAZUSSIONERs MINUTES �dcror�l��dd. ��yfo�rr �°�O�Poo CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 3, 1994 2 ROLL CALL INDEX 4. That grease interceptors shall be provided in all drains within the building where petroleum residues may enter the sewer system, unless otherwise permitted by the Building Department or the Utilities Department. 5. That no outdoor sound system shall be utilized on-site. 6. That all employees shall park on-site at all times. 7. That all signs shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of Newport Beach Sign Code. 8. That the proposed electric guard gate will be solely for vehicles exiting the property. That any future ent security gate shall be located to provide a minimum distance of twenty (20) feet from the front property line, and shall be subject to further review of the City Traffic Engineer. 9. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 10. That arrangements be made with the Public Works Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to record a parcel map or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 11. That the on-site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the Traffic Engineer. 12. That all parking spaces shall be striped with approved traffic markers or painted white lines not less than 4 inches wide. 13. That the required number of handicapped parking spaces shall be designated within the on-site parking area and shall be used solely for handicapped self-parking. One -20- COAU41SSIONERS • • MINUTES .pl�.00 ICI C6c`�O di o �• � s CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 23, 1994 ROLL CALL INDEX handicapped sign on a post and one handicapped sign on the pavement shall be required for each handicapped space. That the required handicap parking spaces shall be relocated to the nearest row of parking adjacent to the building. 14. That the intersection of the private drives and Campus Drive be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 45 miles per hour. Slopes, landscape, walls, signs, monument signs and other obstruction shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight line shall not exceed twenty-four inches in height. 15. That the unused drive approaches be removed and replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalk; that the proposed new drive approaches be constructed with the City's flared approach standard 166-L, and that the settled sections of curb and gutter be reconstructed along the Campus Drive frontage. All work shall be completed under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 16. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Public Works Department, along with a master plan of water, sewer and drainage for the on-site improvements prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. 17. That disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. -21- OONOMSSIONERS MINUTES � s 0 �t��o�o,`Poo CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 23, 1994 ROLL CALL INDEX 18. That overhead utilities serving the site be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code unless it is determined by the City Engineer that such undergrounding is unreasonable or impractical. 19. That this approval of use permit applies only to the facility as a servicing facility with no customer pick-up or drop-off of vehicles to the subject property; and any change to the operational characteristics of the facility to allow for customers to pick-up or drop-off the vebicles to the site and/or for the use of a shuttle bus to transport customers to and from the site shall be subject to approval of an amendment to this use permit. 0. That the proposed monument sign adjacent to Campus Drive shall be moved back or designed in such a manner as to provide sight distance in conformance with the City's Sight Distance Standard 110-L. The final design and positioning of the monument sign shall be approved by the Public Works Department to insure conformance with City sight distance standards. 1. That the drive entrance shall be widened to provide a minimum 14 foot wide aisle exiting the facility, unless otherwise approved by the City Traffic Engineer. The nose of the island of the entrance shall also be relocated so as not to encroach into the public right-of-way. 2. That the car wash area shall be protected so as to prevent drainage from the parking lot from entering the sewer system. The drain shall be connected to the sewer system and have a grease trap. The design and installation of the above facilities shall be approved by the Utilities Department. That the outdoor storage of tires and other auto related parts or merchandise shall be prohibited on-site. -22- COAn ISSIONERS MINUTES °�9F�o �tr��Qoy�oso CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 23, 1994 ROLL CALL INDEX 24. That the entire site shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner. 25. That the front of the building facing Campus Drive shall-be constructed of masonry veneer or similar material as indicated on the approved elevation. 26. Landscaping along Campus Drive shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition., 27. That the approval of this application shall permit complete engine rebuilding (including electrical and transmission repair), as well as tune-ups, lubrication, smog testing and brake service and installation. No painting, body work or other operations of a similar nature shall be permitted on- site unless an amendment to this use permit is approved by the Planning Commission. 28. That the recordation of a Covenant shall be required so as to hold the two lots as a single building site for the duration of the use of the property. 29. That prior to the issuance of a certificate of use and occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate to the Planning Department that the lighting system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent properties and Campus Drive. 0. That prior to the issuance of a certificate of use and occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate to the City's Building Department and Fire Department that the project is in compliance with the County of Orange Health Department and the City's Fire Department Regulations. 1. That the Planning Commission may add or modify conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend to -23- ,C,QA=SSIONERS MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 23, 1994 ROLL CALL INDEX the City Council the revocation of this use permit, or the City Council may revoke this use permit upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this use permit causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the community. 32. This use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Var ce No. 1196 Continued Public Hearing) Item No.4 Request t ermit the construction of a single family dwelling on V1196 property loca d in the R-1.5 District which exceeds 1.5 times the buildable area if the site. The proposal also includes cont'd modifications to t Zoning Code so as to allow the proposed to 7/7/94 structure to encroach feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback, and 7 feet into required 10 foot rear yard setback; a request to construct 6 foot h walls along the side property lines which encroach 15 feet into a required 20 foot front yard setback; and two carport spaces ated on the front one-half of the lot, partially open on both sides ere the Code requires that said covered parking spaces shall have walls and an operating garage door). The modification also inclu the following second floor encroachments into the required 3 foo We yard setbacks: one bay window; one greenhouse window, a he duct; a portion of the living room; and a planter box. LOCATION: Portions of Lots 27 and 28, Block 7, ion Five, Balboa Island, located at 1508 P Avenue, on the northerly side of Park Avenue, between The Grand Canal and Abalone Avenue, on Little Balboa Island. -24- Planning Commission Meeting June 23, 1994 Agenda Item No. 3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO. Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A. Traffic Study No. 97 (Public Hearing) Request to approve a traffic study for a proposed automobile rental facility. AND B. Use Permit No. 3530 (Public Hearing) Request to permit the establishment of an automobile rental facility which includes a car washing and maintenance facility and underground fuel facilities on property located in the M-1-A District.' The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow a monument sign and an electric guard gate to encroach into the required 15 foot front yard setback. LOCATION: Lots 25 and 26, Tract No. 3201, located at 4242-4262 Campus Drive, on the southeasterly side of Campus Drive, between Dove Street and MacArthur Boulevard, across from the John Wayne Airport. ZONE: M-1-A APPLICANT: Nogle Onufer Associates Architects, Inc., San Diego OWNER: The Shattuck Family Trust, Newport Beach Application This is a applicant request to permit the establishment of an automobile rental facility which includes administrative offices,a car washing and maintenance facility and underground fuel facilities on property located in the M-1-A District. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow a 5 foot 6 inch high± monument sign and an electric guard gate to encroach into the required 15 foot front yard setback. In accordance with Section 20.42.025 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, automobile service stations and other uses which in the opinion of the Planning Commission are similar in character are permitted in the M-1-A District, subject to the securing of a use permit in each case. Use permit procedures are outlined in Chapter 20.80 of the Municipal Code; traffic study procedures are set forth in Chapter 15.40 of the Municipal Code; and modification procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.81. 0 TO: Planning Commission - 2 Y Environmental Signii"icance This project has been reviewed, and it has.been determined that-it is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act under Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Conformance with the General Plan The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the site for "Administrative, Professional and Financial Commercial" use. The proposed use is allowed under support retail and service use. The Land Use Element has also established area specific land use policies throughout the City. These'"area"policies set a site-by-site floor area ratio (F.A..R.) development limit of 0.5/35 (Base Development Allocation is 29,006 square feet = 0.5 times the site area). Given that the application is for the construction of a structure containing less than the base development allocation, the proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Land Use Element of the General Plan policies and guidelines.. Subject Property and Surrounding Land Uses The subject property measures 200± feet wide and 290± feet deep with land area of 58,000± square feet. The subject property is currently developed with two single story office buildings (15,000 sq.ft.),which will be demolished, and related on-site parking area. To the northwest, across Campus Drive, is the John Wayne Airport; to the north, is a two story office building; to the east, is a veterinary hospital and a single story light industrial building with related parking areas; and to the south, is an office building. Combination of Lots The proposed site is currently comprised of two lots which are to be consolidated into one parcel of land through a lot line adjustment. The applicant is aware of this requirement and the lot line adjustment application will be submitted subsequent to this use permit approval. The following table has been prepared which sets forth the characteristics of the proposed parcel and proposed project: Parcel No. Parcel Area Building (s.f.) Floor Area Ratio 1 58,000± sq.ft. 3,150± sq:ft. 0.053 The proposed parcel fully conforms to the design standards as specified for the M-1-A District. The Lot Line Adjustment for consolidation of the two lots is for financing and conveyance purposes and for the proposed construction of the automobile rental facility. AnaV3ia The applicant is requesting to allow the establishment of an auto rental servicing facility and related facilities consistent with such operations. The facility will consist of a 3,150± sqft. TO. Planning Commission - 3 structure which will house two maintenance service bays (only minor automobile repairs will be performed), one automobile washing bay and related employee offices. There will also be a canopy with a fuel island and related underground gasoline tank. The proposed hours of operation will be generally 24 hours since vehicles are constantly being serviced or prepared for redelivery, as is typical for automobile rental facilities. The maximum number of employees will be 10 at any one time. The building will be 16 feet 6 inches high and the freestanding canopy will also be approximately 16 feet 6 inches high. The applicant has indicated that the facility will be solely a servicing center and customers will not come to the site to rent vehicles. Therefore, based on this information, staff"has included a condition of approval which will require that to alter the operational characteristics of the facility to allow customers to come to the site, an amendment to this use permit must first be approved by the Planning Commission. The appropriate condition has been incorporated into the attached Exhibit "A". Off-Street Parking Requirement for Proposed Business The Municipal Code does not contain any specific parking requirement for automobile leasing facilities. However, based on a standard of one parking space per each 225 sq.ft. of office space in the M-1-A District specified under Section 20.42.045 of the Municipal Code, the administration and customer service portion of the facility would generate a requirement for 6 parking spaces (1,218± sq. ft. administration _ 225 = 5.4 or 6 spaces). Based on a standard of three spaces for each 1,000 sq.ft. of industrial use as specified under Section 20.42.045 of the Municipal Code, the storage, servicing and car wash portion of site operations would generate a requirement for 6 parking spaces (1,302± sq.ft. maintenance and storage + 630± sq.ft. car wash/preparation area = 1,932± sq.ft. _ 1,000 x 3 = 5.7 or 6 spaces). Thus, the total parking requirement would be 12 spaces (6 spaces + 6 spaces = 12 spaces). As shown on the attached site plan, 26 parking spaces will be provided for employees, visitors, and for automobiles to be serviced. In addition, space for storage of over one hundred fifty vehicles will also be provided on-site. This will be more than adequate to serve the proposed facility. Traffic Study No. 97 The proposed development will generate a significantly higher traffic volume than the light industrial or general office use allowed under the current zoning. Therefore, a traffic study was required to determine the compatibility of the proposed project under the guidelines of the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance. A traffic study has been prepared for the proposed project in conformance with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance and City Council Policy S-1 to examine the consistency and conformity of the project with the City's Circulation Element. The City Traffic Engineer identified the following eight (8) intersections for detailed evaluation in the traffic study. 1. MacArthur Boulevard at Campus Drive 2. MacArthur Boulevard at Birch Street 3. MacArthur Boulevard at Jamboree Road 10 0 TO: Planning Commission - 4 4. Bristol Street North at Campus Drive 5. Bristol Street at Irvine Avenue 6. Bristol Street North at Birch Street 7. Bristol Street at Birch Street 8. Campus Drive at Dove Street The first step in evaluating an intersection's traffic volume capacity is to conduct a 19b, traffic volume analysis, taking into consideration existing traffic, regional growth, and committed projects that the City has granted approvals. If the project's generated traffic is less than one percent traffic-volume on all approach segments to the selected intersections during the projected peak.2-1/2 hour volume in either the morning or afternoon, then the project's traffic impact is considered insignificant and in compliance with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance requirement. In the event that the project's generated traffic exceeds the one percent traffic volume analysis on any approach leg to any of the selected intersections,then further analysis would be required which consists of Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) analysis. The one percent traffic volume test was applied to the selected intersections and one of the intersections exceeded the maximum one percent volume test. The intersection.of Campus Drive at Dove Street exceeded 1%of the intersection traffic volume; therefore,further ICU analysis for that intersection became necessary. The ICU analysis indicated that the intersection of Campus Drive at Dove Street is operating at acceptable level of service for both peak periods. The intersection of Campus Drive/Dove Street, currently maintains a Level of Service "B" with an ICU value of 0.63, less than required by the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance. The proposed project would generate 21 inbound trips and 16 outbound trips in the morning peak hour and 21 inbound and 20 outbound trips in the evening peak hour. The additional trips on Campus Drive generated by the project would not•deteriorate the existing ICU value or level of Service at the intersection of Campus Drive and Dove Street. Therefore, the proposed project would not have any significant impact on the City's circulation network. The ICU analysis is contained in Appendix C of the Traffic Study. The Traffic Study for this project indicates that the proposed automobile rental, storage and maintenance facility would generate 380 trip ends per day. Vehicular Access and Parking Access to the site is provided via Campus Drive. Presently, there are two driveways that provide for ingress and egress to the site. The existing driveways will be demolished, replaced with curb and gutter and a new driveway,wiil be constructed for vehicular access from Campus Drive. It is the recommendation of the Traffic Consultant that the width of the exit portion of the drive be increased to a minimum of 14 feet to accommodate exiting vehicles. TO: Planning Commission - 5 Public Improvements Staff has observed that the existing public improvements on the site, namely sidewalks and drive approaches, are either damaged,will be unused, or nonconforming to City Standards. The Public Works Department has indicated that the unused drive aprons be replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalks and that the parking lot be striped, in conformance with City Standards. Staff has also recommended that the nose of the island shown at the entrance to the facility be relocated so as not to encroach into the public right-of-way. Gasoline Storage Tank The applicant has requested to add an underground gasoline storage tank and pumps to the facility. The Building Department and the Fire Department do not object to the gasoline tanks so long as approval is in compliance with the County of Orange Health Department and the City's Fire Department Regulations. Modification to Encroach into Front Yard Setback The applicant requests the approval of a modification to allow a monument sign and an electric guard gate to encroach into the required 15 foot front yard setback. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum 15 foot front yard setback on Campus Drive, unless a modification to the Zoning Code is approved. The proposed single-faced monument sign measures 5 feet 6 inches high by 7± feet in length,with 32 sq.ft. of copy identifying the site as a National Car Rental facility. The single-faced monument sign is proposed to be set back 4.5 feet from the front property line. However, the Public Works Department and the City Traffic Engineer have determined that the sign location as proposed may not be in accordance with City Standards for sight distance and the appropriate condition of approval to assure compliance with those standards has been included in the attached Exhibit "A". It is staffs opinion that the proposed monument sign is acceptable inasmuch as the site is quite large with limited access, and clear identification would enhance circulation in the area. Furthermore, the sign encroachment is consistent with other signs that have been approved by the Planning Commission and the Modifications Committee in front yard setbacks in this area. The proposed electric guard gate for vehicles exiting the facility is similar to those proposed by other car rental facilities which encroach into the required 15 foot front yard setback. Staff has no objection to this gate location as much as it is for exiting vehicles only. However, it is staffs opinion that, in the future, an encroachment of this nature regulating entry to the site could impair pedestrian circulation by automobiles stopping across the public sidewalk. In order to assure that pedestrian circulation is not affected, the City Traffic Engineer has recommended that the location of any future entry security gate be set back a minimum of 20 feet from the front property line and be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer. The applicant has been made aware of this requirement and the appropriate conditions of approval have been included in the attached Exhibit "X. 0 TO: Planning Commission - 6 The plans also show the location of a decorative masonry wall, along Campus Drive, to encroach into the required 15 foot front yard setback. The applicant has indicated that the proposed height is 6 feet,whereas,the height of such structures within the 15 foot front yard setback is limited to a maximum of 3 feet. The applicant has indicated that the intent was for the wall to be located so as not to encroach into the required 15 foot front yard setback, therefore, the appropriate condition of approval has been incorporated into the attached Exhibit "A". Specific Findings Chapter 15.40 of the Municipal Code requires that the Planning Commission make certain findings in conjunction with its approval of a traffic study. Section 20.80.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code also provides that in order to grant any use permit, the Planning Commission shall find that the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use or building applied for will not,under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrimental or injurious.to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. Should the Planning Commission wish to approve Traffic Study No. 97 and Use Permit No. 3530, the findings and conditions of approval set forth in the attached Exhibit "A" are suggested. No exhibit for denial has been provided,inasmuch as staff is of the opinion that no findings may be reasonably made in support of the denial of these ,applications. However, should information be presented at the public,hearing which warrants a denial of these applications, the Planning Commission may wish to ,take such an action. PLANNING DEPARTMENT JA ES)D. HEWIC R, Director �By L , Oct k" )JAVIER S:GARCIA Senior Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" Vicinity Map Operational Statement from the Applicant Traffic Study No. 97 date stamped May 26, 1994 Site Plan, Elevations and Sign Plan F.\WP51\JAY-G\UP\AUr0\UP3530SR TO. Planning Commission - 7 EXHIBIT "A" FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 97 AND USE PERMrr NO. 3530 A. TRAFFIC STUDY NO 97: Approve the Traffic Study, making the findings listed below: FINDINGS: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the peak-hour traffic and circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project-generated traffic will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any 'major,' 'primary-modified; or 'primary' street. 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project-generated traffic will not be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on seven of the eight study intersections and that the ICU analysis for the intersection of Campus Drive/Dove Street, indicates that the ICU values for the A.M. and P.M. peaks will not be altered by the addition of the project. B. USE PERMIT NO. 3530 FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed application is support service in nature and as such, is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. That adequate parking will exist on-site for the proposed development. 3. That the proposed project will not have any significant environmental impact and that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act under Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). TO: Planning Commission - 8 4. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed development. 5. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 20.80.060 of the Municipal Code. 6. That the proposed modification to the Newport Beach Municipal Code so as to allow the proposed monument sign and electric guard gate to encroach into the required 15 foot front yard setback will not, under the circumstances of this case be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City, and further that the proposed modification is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of,the Municipal Code. 7. That the approval of Use Permit No. 3530 will not, under the circumstances of this case,be detrimental to the health,safety,peace,morals,comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. CONDMONS: 1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot.plan, floor plan and elevations, except as noted below. 2. That all mechanical equipment, trash areas and vehicle storage areas shall be screened from Campus Drive and adjoining properties. The proposed block wall adjacent to the Campus Drive frontage shall be a minimum 6 feet high and shall be set back a ra iimum 15 feet from the front property line. 3. That all automobile repairs shall be conducted within the building and no outdoor display of vehicles for sale shall be permitted. 4. That grease interceptors shall be provided in.all drains within the building where petroleum residues may enter the sewer system, unless otherwise permitted by the Building Department or the Utilities Department. 5. That no outdoor sound system shall be utilized on-site. 6. That all employees shall park on-site at all times. 7. That all signs shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of Newport Beach Sign Code. 0 TO. Planning Commission - 9 8. That the proposed electric guard gate will be solely for vehicles exiting the property. That any future pat—ry security gate shall be located to provide a minimum distance of twenty(20)feet from the front property line, and shall be subject to further review of the City Traffic Engineer. 9. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 10. That arrangements be made with the Public Works Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to record a parcel map or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 11. That the on-site parking,vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the Traffic Engineer. 12. That all parking spaces shall be striped with approved traffic markers or painted white lines not less than 4 inches wide. 13. That the required number of handicapped parking spaces shall be designated within the on-site parking area and shall be used solely for handicapped self-parking. One handicapped sign on a post and one handicapped sign on the pavement shall be required for each handicapped space. That the required handicap parking spaces shall be relocated to the nearest row of parking adjacent to the building. 14. That the intersection of the private drives and Campus Drive be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 45 miles per hour. Slopes, landscape, walls, signs, monument signs and other obstruction shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight line shall not exceed twenty-four inches in height. 15. That the unused drive approaches be removed and replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalk; that the proposed new drive approaches be constructed with the City's flared approach standard 166-L, and that the settled sections of curb and gutter be reconstructed along the Campus Drive frontage. All work shall be completed under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 16. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Public Works Department, along with a master plan of water, sewer and drainage for the on-site improvements prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. 17. That disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment TO: Planning Commission - 10 and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. 18. That overhead utilities serving the site be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code unless it is determined by the City Engineer that such undergrounding is unreasonable or impractical. 19. That this approval of use permit applies only to the facility as a servicing facility with no customer pick-up or drop-off of vehicles to the subject property; and any change to the operational characteristics of the facility to allow for customers to pick-up or drop-off the vehicles to the site and/or for the use of a shuttle bus to transport customers to and from the site shall be subject to approval of an amendment to this use permit. 20. That the proposed monument sign adjacent to Campus Drive shall be moved back or designed in such a manner as to provide sight distance in conformance with the City's Sight Distance Standard 110-L. The final design and positioning of the monument sign .shall be approved by the Public Works Department to insure conformance with City sight distance standards. 21. That the drive entrance shall be widened to provide a minimum 14 foot wide aisle exiting-the facility,unless otherwise approved by the City Traffic Engineer. The nose of the island at the entrance shall also be relocated so as not to encroach into the public right-of-way. 22. That the car wash area shall be protected so as to prevent drainage from the parking lot from entering the sewer system. The drain shall be connected to the sewer system and have a grease trap. The design and installation of the above facilities shall be approved by the Utilities Department. 23. That the outdoor storage of tires and other auto related parts or merchandise shall be prohibited on-site. 24. That the entire site shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner. 25. That the front of the building facing Campus Drive shall be constructed of'masonry veneer or similar material as indicated on the approved elevation. 26. Landscaping along Campus Drive shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 27. That the approval of this application shall permit complete engine rebuilding (including electrical and transmission repair), as well as tune-ups, lubrication, smog testing and brake service and installation. No painting, body work or other operations of a similar nature shall be permitted,on-site unless an amendment to this 0 0 -7 TO: Planning Commission - it use permit is approved by the Planning Commission. 28. That a Lot Line Adjustment shall be approved and recorded to combine the two lots into one building site prior to the issuance of building permits, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Department and the Public Works Department. 29. That prior to the issuance of a certificate of use and occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate to the Planning Department that the lighting system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent properties and Campus Drive. 30. That prior to the issuance of a certificate of use and occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate to the City's Building Department and Fire Department that the project is in compliance with the County of Orange Health Department and the City's Fire Department Regulations. 31. That the Planning Commission may add or modify conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend to the City Council the revocation of this use permit, or the City Council may revoke this use permit upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this use permit causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the community. 32. This use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. VICINITY MAP i 4 ,I.•w. P-L I P-C P-C I m / BIRCH STREET 1 t f '.1 1 I � " yy n e. a 4J P-C P-C2 Y . I t Rcs.•a +3U '94F• P-C 4 u •P-C I rLl. .k y pf n: 2 P-r. Yt i I t4 :.-. ' .. �. �4 C I •� P•C LISTWI:1 P --11--- ----4 1- _ � r-c ^QQtQY IN MAP 4 � D I STR I CT 1 IV G MAP NEWPORT BEACH CALI FOR NI. N=• .CeICKTwII Ntfm[xT4L �� I I1�11 11NDlC CWN RESIDENT'" L= ,� LIDNT COYY[IICIII �R�t � DpM10E R[SW[MTIK C-S� SlMLMI CpuY[P[14 1 ---, I LEA'-, R11NKTi0"IKC IA.0 MLDCMUI =,EM m"ur NxINO I I .S11,40 1 pPp.AD, YNCL ... L. ee a- c;I couew y-ixD DISTRICT - J a,[ USE PERMIT NO . 3530 TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 97 National Car Rental System,Inc. World Headquarters 7700 France Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 66435 612-830.2121 March 29. 1994 National Car Rental 4242 &4262 Campus Drive Newport Beach, California OPERATIONAL STATEMENT The primary operation of the National Service Facility will be to clean and maintain rental oars that have bean rented at the Orange County/John Wayne Airport. National's rental cars will be picked up and dropped off at the John Wayne Airport by the customers. National employees will shuttle these retumed vehicles to this new facility to be cleaned and refueled, then driven back to the airport by the employees for customer use. No customers are anticipated to drop off or pick up rental cars at this facility. The process for these retumed cars will be as follows; They will enter the site from the west approach on Campus Drive and be lined up to be cleaned. The cars will then proceed to the canopy for refueling, vacuuming and topping off of fluids. The next step is to proceed through the car wash bay where the car Is washed using an automatic car wash. The cleaned car is then lined up in the storage area on the east side of the site until it is needed at the airport. The Cars will then exit the site from the east approach on to Campus Drive.—_ Secondary uses of the facility include housing of National's administration offices. Employee and visitor parking has been provided for these uses. The building will also contain two maintenance bays that will be used to maintain the fleet of rental oars. The maintenance services will consist of oil changes, minor mechanical and alectrical repairs and pre-delivery inspections. \ � 1 TRAFFIC STUDY i FOR NATIONAL CAR RENTAL . SERVICE FACILITY Prepa'redfor The City of Newport Beach Prepared by %imley Horn and Associates, Inc. REG�tD�4AR CITY OF NBWPORTTMENT p1,pNHiNG BEAGB+ MA t1PY 2619s� b,110,31121 213,41516 o May 1994 visit TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 TRIP GENERATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 TRIP DISTRIBUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Committedprojects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Intersectionsto be analyzed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 C test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 ICU test . 11' MITIGATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . it ON-SITE CIRCULATION AND PARKING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 SITE ACCESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 LIST OF FIGURES FIGUREI -Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 FIGURE2 - Site Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 FIGURE 3 - Current Service Facility Vehicle Routing 5 FIGURE 4 :Proposed Service Facility Vehicle Routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 FIGURE 5 -Project Trip Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 FIGURE 6 -Project Traffic - Morning and Evening Peak Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 - Summary of Project Trip Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 TABLE 2 -List of Approved Projects and Occupancy Level as of May, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 TABLE 3 - Summary of Intersection Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 INTRODUCTION Kimley-horn and Associates has been retained to conduct a traffic impact analysis for the proposed National Car Rental Service'Facility on Campus Drive, south of the John Wayne Airport. City policy requires that any project consisting of more"than 10,000 square feet of gross floor area, ten or more dwelling units, or generating more than 130 daily trips must be evaluated in accordance with the requirements of the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance(TPO). As this report will-indicate, the project will generate more than 130 daily trips. Therefore, the following analysis has been conducted in accordance with the TPO requirements. PROJECT DESCRIPTION National Car Rental System, Inc. proposes to relocate an existing National Car Rental Service Facility to a 1.3-acre site on the south side of Campus Drive, between Dove Street and MacArthur Boulevard. The existing Service Facility is located on the West side of Bristol Street South,between Birch Street and Cypress Street. An area map is provided on Figure 1, and depicts both the existing and,the proposed Service Facility locations. A copy of the project site plan is provided on Figure 2. The project site is currently occupied by two single-story multi-tenant industrial office buildings,totalling approximately 15,000 square feet. These buildings would be demolished to allow for development of the proposed project. The proposed Service Facility is to house the facilities for cleaning, maintaining, and fueling the rental vehicles, after they have been returned by the customer. A small office,building will be provided for administrative personnel. The site plan-indicates parking storage for 164 rental vehicles (110 spaces for cars that are ready for rental, 42 for cars just returned, and 12 for cars being serviced), and 14 spaces for employees and visitors. National Car Rental has a leasing agent and a 90-space parking area at the John Wayne Airport. All customer pick-up and drop-off activity will take place at the airport. The operation at the Service Facility will primarily involve shuttling the "ready cars" to the airport lot, and picking up the return cars from the airport lot and taking them back to the Service Facility to be cleaned and fueled. The vehicles are transferred between the airport and the Service Facility by National Car Rental drivers. The cars are transferred in groups, With, for example, five ready cars driven from the Service Facility to the airport, and five returned cars driven back. The project site is proposed to have one right-in-right-out-only driveway on Campus Drive, located at approximately the center of the project. The existing use on the site is serviced by two right-in-tight-out only driveways,located at both edges of the property. The existing raised median on Campus Drive will preclude any left-turn movements into or out of the site. Traffic approaching the site from the north on Campus Drive will be required to make a U-turn at Dove Street, and make a northbound right turn into the site. 4- I NOT TO SCALE / / e 0 °Q Io� Q� Sf m 0� fa 0 E �a o� �o z 5� c° 5 0 FIGURE 1 LEGEND LOCATION MAP • ANALYSIS INTERSECTIONS c Kimley—Horand ss❑oclates, Inc. 2 `n Ili) illl i[il Ilii Ihi Ilil Ifil ifll Ifii fill �� tiiii i . ilil IfiJ ■ I � • Ifli i121 � _ �, � �, ■ n Ijll Ifil oil I[II Ifil ail Iri lal 111I r,l I Inl lid m' y' IIII 1!I INI un Ili till lill Ifil I@I 1lil I(ll 1(II IHI Ifjl r�i r�i rsi :�� ; � � � � r� �`t� II.1 LI■It r? A National Car Rental representative has indicated that the new (proposed) location will result in significant time and cost savings for the company, due to the reduction in time and distance required to travel back and forth between the airport and the service facility. The driver's route between the airport and the existing service facility is depicted on Figure 3, and the new route for the proposed site is depicted on Figure 4. As comparison of these two figures reveals, relocation of the Service Facility to the proposed location will result in a much shorter round-trip for the rental vehicles, as well as a reduction in traffic on some movements at a number of intersections. While the reduction in traffic at some intersections is acknowledged, this analysis will focus on the impact of the addition of project traffic to any impacted intersections, per the TPO requirements. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation estimates for the project are based on the number of parking spaces provided for rental cars on the site. The site plan indicates parking is provided for 164 rental cars. Trip generation rates for the project are based on a traffic study conducted by Austin Foust and Associates for a similar facility in the City of Newport Beach. Daily and peak hour trip generation rates, and the resulting project trip generation for 164 rental cars are summarized on Table 1. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Description In I Out In Out In Out Car Rental Trip Generation Rates (trips per car) 1.1 1.22 0.13 0.10 0.13 0.12 ® National Car Rental Trip t� Generation (164 cars) 180 200 21 16 21 20 The project will generate approximately 380 daily trips, with 21 inbound and 16 outbound trips in the morning peak hour, and 21 inbound and 20 outbound trips in the evening peak hour. The current uses on the site are still generating some traffic, not quantified by site counts. The TPO allows for deduction of existing traffic generation in the analysis of proposed project impact. For a worst-case analysis,the full traffic generation for the proposed Service Facility is assumed in the analysis, without any deduction taken for existing uses on site. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The assumed distribution of project traffic is depicted on Figure S. This distribution assumes that the majority of project-related traffic (80%) is comprised of the activity between the airport and the service facility, and will follow the routing depicted on Figure 4; and that the remainder (20%) is comprised of employees and service and sales traffic. -4- lA NOT TO SCALE i / / Q c° 6,/S�o�S e�°r •� � J m / O`Oij L S� -� a i u o` 6�0 • �o �o cy b r J FIGURE 3 CURRENT SERVICE FACILITY VEHICLE ROUTING Klmley-Horn�arid Ass aoeiotes, Inc. N01 TO SCALE \ / a40 d� Qo5 �o O� Q er: QJy �O s!o!9! GoF ryti 4e S! r�slo! 0�0 0 `S! m ! 6 0 E �a o� F�O �o 0 c� J n N h Z< O F FIGURE 4 PROPOSED SERVICE FACILITY VEHICLE ROUTING Kimley—Horne and Assoc ates, Inc. 1,101 10 SCALE 5-7- f Sx < / 0 K O O S r/SIOj S G°� y� a`a Sf Bi•• � 4 S! m Q O �D °o o� P�O �o �d l 9� �4+ a FIGURE 5 s �( PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION a Kimley-Horn�an sales. Inc. 7 • Based on these trip distribution assumptions, the peak hour project traffic at the area intersections is depicted on Figure 6. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS The methodology for the evaluation of the project's traffic-related impacts is defined in the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance (Ordinance 86-20) and explained in detail in the Administrative Procedures for Implementing The Traffic Phasing Ordinance. Compliance with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance requires that detailed impact analysis of the project traffic be conducted at any intersection to which the project will add one percent or more of the projected traffic volume during the AM or PM peak 2.5-hour period. Projected volumes include existing traffic volumes; regional growth, where appropriate; and projected traffic from:committed projects. The analysis year is one year after completion of the project, and is assumed to be two years from the date of this report. Regional traffic growth is applied on selected City roadways which are assumed to carry a component of regional (non-local) traffic. The growth rates on these roadways have been determined by the City, of Newport Beach, through regional modelling and historical evaluation procedures. A copy of the City of Newport Beach Regional Traffic Annual Growth Rate list is provided in Appendix A of this report. Based on this list, MacArthur Boulevard has a regional growth rate of 3 percent per year within the study area. No other roadway segments impacted by the project have a regional growth factor. Committed projects For purposes of this analysis, committed projects are those projects that have been approved,but are not fully occupied, and therefore are not yet impacting the area intersections with their full trip generating potential. The list of committed projects and their respective level of occupancy as of May, 1994, are shown on Table 2 and were provided by the City of Newport Beach. EN Traffic to be generated by these projects is added to existing traffic volumes,plus regional growth at area intersections, to arrive at projected traffic volumes for the analysis year. Intersections to be analyzed Based on review of the project operation, and the likely origins and destinations of the project-related trips, the following intersections were identified for analysis: • MacArthur Boulevard and Campus Drive • MacArthur Boulevard and Birch Street • MacArthur Boulevard and Jamboree Boulevard • Bristol Street North and Campus Drive • Bristol Street South and Irvine Boulevard • Bristol Street North and Birch Street • Bristol Street South and Birch Street • Campus Drive and Dove Street -8- NOT TO SCALE � / Q / e / s/2 / O 0 / ry0\ry C10 Q0y Se 'Stars! G°� r5` a�Sr ar r m y Y r a 0 �a o� F� �o �0 1 -c a +�9 i n FIGURE 6 PROJECT TRAFFIC - MORNING AND EVENING PEAK HOUR Kirnley—Horn❑anAssociates. Inc. 9 � y TABLE 2 LIST OF APPROVED PROJECTS AND OCCUPANCY LEVEL AS OF MAY, 1994 Project Name Occupancy Civic Plaza 96% Corporate Plaza 30% Newport Place 96% Valdez 40% Koll Center Newport No. I TPP 0% 1400 Dove Street 80% Koll Center TPP Amend.4A 0% Rosan's Development 65% Fashion Island N2 0% Ncwporter Resort Expand 0% 28th St. Marina Project 50% Pacific Bell Site 0% Newport Village 0% Castaways Marina 0% Koll Center Carl's Jr. 52% Civic Plaza 0% Corporate Plaza&West 0% Harbor Pacific Plaza 0% Hoag Hospital Extension 0% Corporate Plaza West D 0% Interpretive Center 0% Pacific Mutual 1601 Avocado 0% Newport Diagnostic#85 0% Alamo Car Rental 0% Pao Tel Mini Storage 0% Four Seasons Addition 0% Family Fitness Center 0% Amendment No. 1 Ford Aero 0% ® Ciosa-Irvine Project 0% �l Newport Dunes 0% ® Bayview 0% 9� City of Irvine Dev. 0% 10 K')CZ 0 The location of each of these intersections, in relation to the project site, is indicated on Figure 1 (presented previously). 1% test For the 1% Test, the project peak hour trip generation is doubled, to reflect the likely peak 2.5-hour project traffic,generation. The projected 2.5-hour peak period approach volume for each intersection leg is comprised of the Existing peak 2.5-hour volume, provided by the City of Newport Beach; plus Regional Growth; where appropriate, plus Committed Project traffic. The project will add 1% of the peak 2.5-hour projected volume at only one intersection—Campus Drive at Dove Street. The morning peak hour project traffic volume represents 2.3% of the peak 2.5-hour volume on the southbound approach at this intersection. In accordance with the requirements of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance, an intersection capacity utilization analysis will be conducted at this intersection. The 1% Analysis Worksheets for all analysis intersections are contained in Appendix B of this report. ICU Test The operation of the intersection of Campus Drive at Dove Street is presented on Table 3 for the following conditions: • Existing Conditions • Existing plus Regional Growth plus Committed Projects • Existing plus Regional Growth plus Committed Projects plus Project TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION OPERATION Intersection: Campus Drive/Dove Street AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour CONDITION ICU LOS ICU LOS Existing .63' B .65 B Existing + Growth + Committed Projects .64 B .68 B Existing + Growth + Committed Projects + Project .65 B ,68 B The intersection currently operates at Level of Service "B" (LOS "B") in the morning peak hour, with an ICU of 0.63, and at LOS "B" in the evening peak hour, with an ICU of 0.65. With the addition of regional traffic growth, and traffic from committed projects, the intersection will continue to operate at LOS "B" in both peak hours, with ICU's of 0.64 and 0.68. The addition of project traffic to the intersection will not change the intersection level of service. The intersection will continue to operate i[ at LOS "B" in both peak hours, with ICU's of 0.65-and 0.68. The ICU worksheet for this intersection �( is provided in Appendix C of this report. -11- 2� MITIGATIONS No traffic-related mitigation measures will be required of the proposed National Car Rental Service Facility. By application of the 1% Test, the project will impact one intersection (Campus Drive and Dove Street), and will not cause the intersection to operate at worse than Level of Service "D". ON-SITE CIRCULATION AND PARKING The parking provisions for the site consist of an area for 110 Ready Cars (counting 2 in the drive aisle), an area for 42 Return Cars (counting 6 in the drive aisles or in the car wash area), and a limited number of spaces at the back of the site designated for service, employees, and visitors. The parking areas for the Ready Cars and the Return Cars are designed such that the cars are parked bumper to bumper, side by side, and do not allow for circulation between the rows of cars. This area is not intended to be used by the general public. Movement of cars into and out of these parking areas will be accomplished by National Car Rental drivers, only. The vehicles depicted on the site plan measure 6 feet wide by 15 feet long. The 15-foot length would be typical of a compact car; the typical standard passenger vehicle is 18 to 20 feet long. Depending on the mix of rental vehicle types and sizes on the site, the operator may not be able to fit the number of vehicles shown on the site plan in the parking areas. The traffic study addresses the full 164 vehicles, and represents a worse-case analysis. Circulation through the site consists of a single main drive aisle down the middle of the site, and cross aisles at the front and the back of the site. There are a number of locations on the site where vehicle circulation appears to be "tight". When the Ready Car and the Return Car parking areas are full, circulation around the perimeter of the site will not be possible, and the cross aisles will dead end at three of the four corners of the site. The cross aisle at the front of the site will only be 20 feet wide, if the first row of the parking is occupied. This is mitigated by the fact that each aisle is intended to carry, primarily one-way traffic (one way into the site for the Return Car side, and one way out of the site,for the Ready Car side), and that only National Car Rental drivers are intended to drive in these areas. The double-loaded drive aisle at the back (southwest comer) of the site is also only 20 feet wide. This drive aisle will carry two-way traffic, may be used by drivers other than National Car Rental drivers, and may involve vehicles driven by or for the handicapped. This drive aisle is recommended for reconfiguration, to provide a minimum of 24 feet, per City of Newport Beach standards. ' When cars leave the car wash, they will be parked in the area immediately outside the car wash to be dried. This drying area is,located in the inbound lane of the main drive aisle. Vehicles destined for the back of the site will need to cross into the outbound lane to-get by any car in the drying area. While this is not an ideal design feature, it is assumed that, with the low volume of vehicles expected to access the back of the site, the potential for conflict at this location will be quite low. While many of these circulation features would not provide adequate internal circulation if the site served customer traffic or the general public, use of the site is expected to be limited to the employees of the site, and an occasional visitor. SITE ACCESS The existing use on the site is currently accessed by two right-in-right-out only driveways, located at both edges of the property. The National Car Rental facility site is proposed to have one right-in-right-out- Orly driveway on Campus Drive, located at approximately the center of the project. As shown on the site plan, the inbound lane is 24 feet wide, and would be equipped with "Tiger Teeth" to prohibit -12- 1 � 0 • outbound movements. The outbound lane is shown to be 10 feet wide, and controlled with an electronic gate. A 10-foot raised median divides the inbound and outbound lanes, City of Newport Beach Standard Plan 160E indicates that a commercial driveway should be a minimum of 24 feet wide (12 feet in each direction assumed), or 14 feet if one-way. The 14400t minimum requirement allows for movement of emergency vehicles and otherIarge vehicles that may have to service the site. It is recommended that the outbound lane be widened to a minimum of 14 feet, which could be accomplished by either moving the raised median over four feet (to the south), which would narrow the inbound lane; or by narrowing down to the median to six feet. The full 24-foot width on the inbound lane is not needed, since it is a right-turn-only approach, and will only require one inbound lane. SUMMARY • National Car Rental System, Inc. proposes to relocate an existing service facility,to a site on Campus Drive, south of John Wayne Airport. • The facility will house 164 rental cars, and facilities for cleaning, maintaining, and fueling rental vehicles. • The facility will service the National Car Rental leasing operation at the John Wayne Airport. All customer pick-up and drop-off activity will take place at the airport. "Ready Cars" will be exchanged at the airport'by National.Car Rental drivers for returned cars, which will%be brought back to the service facility to be cleaned and fueled. • The proposed operation will generate 380 trips per day, with 21 inbound and 16 outbound trips in the morning peak hour, and 21 inbound and 20 outbound trips in the evening peak hour. • The majority of project trips will travel only between the service facility and the airport lot. • The impact of the project was evaluated'by applying the 1% Test, as required by the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance. The project would contribute 1'% or more of the morning peak 2.5- hour period projected volume on.the southbound leg of Campus Drive at Dove Street. The project does not impact any other intersection by 1%. • The addition of project traffic would not cause the intersection of Campus Drive and Dove Street to operate at an unsatisfactory level of service in either the morning or the evening peak hour. • The project will not be required to make improvements or modifications to the circulation system to mitigate project impact. -13- 1 � I 7. APPENDIX A CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANNUAL GROWTH RATES 1q CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANNUAL GROWTH RATE COAST HIGHWAY East city limit to MacArthur Boulevard 2% MacArthur Boulevard to Jamboree Road 2%- Jamboree Road to Newport Boulevard 2% Newport Boulevard to west city limit 4% IRVINE AVENUE All 2.5% JAMBOREE ROAD` Coast Highway to San Joaquin Hills Road 3% San Joaquin Hills Road to Bison 2%- Bison to Bristol 1% Bristol to Campus 1% MACARTHUR BOULEVARD Coast Highway to San Joaquin Hills Road 6% San Joaquin Hills Road to north city limit 3% NEWPORT BOULEVARD Coast Highway to north city limit 1% Street segments not listed are assumed to have O% regional growth. ��J APPENDIX B 1% ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS y 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BOULEVARD/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage inter' pr Ing 19 92 AM Peak 2h Hour Approved ■■■ Approach Existing Regional Projects Protected 1% of Protected Protect Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 24 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume (3K-4yrs I Northbound 1525 (q2 31-7 Ao34 AO i O (�w yw-, &44 3935 39 i �I Southbound 2924 367 Eastbound 2284 p $Z Westbound 911 O 38 94q 10 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected © Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected El Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BOULEVARD/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 9 92 )PM Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2JI Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound (3'/0• Fyra:) 2365 0111 Jq5 34o 35 0 Southbound (31. •Myra 3581 4 q 373 q`}03 -- `t Eastbound 1699 O 11 1710 17 i $ Westbound 2817 O G3 1 Abbo 2q I 2 a Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 23-2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is -required. i NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT: 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BLVD/BIRCH' ST (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 9 ,_ AM s Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1. of Projected Project Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1569 W/ 3Yr5.) I i I45 a-73 Ig51 '20 I; Southbound 1967 t83 Tao 47 a'7O 129 (� Eastbound 991 0 R I I l l A 11 i O 4 Westbound 629 0 50 to—lq 7 ? II Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 232, Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is .required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT:. �� 4 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BLVD/BIRCH ST (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 93)PM Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 21s Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume (31.-3yrs. I i a Northbound 1737 1(,I 111 2(,09 Southbound I ° 3yra R-7 ; ,Z 2121 9 3$5 a7o Eastbound 1182 O 191 1373 0 -- � Westbound 1746 O 55 )001 1 O i i Q Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume: Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT: �� 1% Traffic Volume Analysis i Intersection JAMBOREE RD/MACARTHUR BLVD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 9 _ AM Peak 2JI Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 2841 ?63 47R 357l0 3 .Z Southbound (DY. 3y s• 1166 log 10413 132R a3 i 2 , ' p'b-3yro. Eastbound 3257 91 1181 y5g3 )45 C Westbound 2014 GI AB O t a Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 23-2 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected [� Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis i's .required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT: 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/MACARTHUR BLVD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1,9 3_) PM $ Peak 2h Hour Approved F h Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project on Peak 2+ Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume nd 1831 170 l012 cZ(ul3 a4 2876 Southbound AV1 700 3$43 38 1'. •31rs. Eastbound 2208 0 q8-7 3A4,A 3:Z i o Westbound 3631 110 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2Z Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FAC11.rrY DUNE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT: 3n 1% Traffic Volume Analysis E W NIS Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existin%g Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 9 92)AM Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak 2h,Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2$ Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 5389' 0 107 5�53 . S5 2� Southbound 1218 O 3o Eastbound _0_ t7 6 i d Westbound 2641 0 5 319a 3a- o Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2Z Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ElPeak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY TUNE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT: 1% Traffic Volume Analysis 2 Ao Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 _)PM �y Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2y Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 3436 Southbound 3569 1-20 i Eastbound p 0_ Q Q _ Q i fj Westbound 10 1O(o,1-- -7917 73. � d 6255 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected C] Peak 21-2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILrrY JUKE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT: -a,C� • � r 1% Traffic Vgqlume�Analysis W �•�'• Intersection BRIA OL ST/CAMPUS DR—IRVINE AV (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average nter pring 19 LJ _ Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected If, of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 3952 Q 4y' Southbound 991 d 11197 rEad6645 �Og 73Mo _ o a v o 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than, 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is,required. , NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT: 4() 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Gf LL) .i": ' Intersection BRIAL ST/CAMPUS DR—IRVINE AV (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 93)PM Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume f i Northbound 3002 p�l� 3`p�7 40 Southbound 2823 O Eastbound 5600 307 00 59 O i i Westbound —0— O 0 Q © t J Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2Z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is .required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE' PROJECT: 4 l 1% Traffic Volume Analysis IF W 1/s Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/BIRCH STREET (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19g� P1q. Peak 21g Hour ApproYed Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 21s Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume .Volume Volume Volume Northbound 2436 O southbound 711 1 ldD- 1 841.3 1 O Eastbound _ _ Westbound D ��/_ �g8 odd Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected [� Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: PRDJ ECF�: 1% Traffic Volume Analysis 57/co L Intersection 13RISTOL STREET NORTH/BIRCH STREET (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Average Winter/Spring 1PLY37M I Peak 2)1 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak Volue Peaur Peak Pea Peak lu Volume m Volume Vome Y Volume Northbound 1192 Q Southbound 2937 O Eastbound _Q_ O Q �Westbound 4532 O Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT: _ c I i 1% Traffic //Volume Analysis s L/� �J•1�11 I Intersection BRISTOL ST/BIRCH ST (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 93)AM Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 473 p 01-0 Yq3 5 Southbound 578 0 11 $ LEastbound 4336 0 �Q eJoZo� 52-stbound _o_ 0 a o o Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 212 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY TUNE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT: C ' 'c • 1% Traffic Volu4mru Analysis IS Intersection BRISTOL ST/BIRCH ST (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter Spring 19 93)Pm Peak 23s Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project i Direction Peak 21s Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 634 � Q southbound 1336 5 139,�✓ O Eastbound 3982 10 5D3OJ I /s i p Westbound _O_ O O Q d � Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. i NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY DATE JUNE, 1994 PROJECT: FORM I 1; ECCEIVED p MY 19 1994 1% Traffic Volume Analysis trd3iAi91 Intersection, CAMPUS/DOVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 91)AM Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1v of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 21 Hour Peak 2y Hour i Peak 2� Hour ,II Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume VoIwe i Northbound 3407 © (y8 3$ 0 4 I northbound :29 91 O (OQ 75- 16 4-0 i Eastbound 0 1 pZ. 3/ 1 . 3 Westbound22 O /0 152- Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2Z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 ' DATE: PROJECT: cnm. - 1% Traffic Volume Analysis i Intersection CAMPUS/DOVE (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Inter pring 9 91 PM Peak 2y Hour Approved [PApproach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1� of Protected Project ion Peak 24 Hour Growth Peak 2�S Hour Peak 2k Hour PeaVoluk 2hmeour ' PeaVolumeour Volume Volume Volume Volume i und 1942 0 30 �q72 oZV d und 3786 Q 13-D- 3908 39 4d Eastbound 0? 4-1 39 Westbound 337 O aL4- 3loj 4' 2 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume i Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. II NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT: cnMA 4n • a t t i APPENDIX C INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION WORKSHEET CA4220AM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: CAMPUS & DOVE EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1991 AH. •--'..................•-..___-----__-_•__.- __--___.-________•.-__.-.••._ I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEOI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVOlune I V/C I I ICapacitylCapacityl Volune I Ratio I Volune I VOIUne Iw/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I Votune 1 1' 1 -• .....................................I I NL 1 1600 I 1 39 1 0.02 * O 1 0 1 O.O`L . 1 O 1 0.01- 1 ••--------------- I I NT I 1 1415 O 1 g+ I 1 0 1 I --- 0.51r`--------------- "I i-------') 3200 --------•---- ) o:5 a•�c � 1059.•;FI I NR 1 1 208 .1' O 1 j p I 1 d __-__•-__.__----f-,•___________________•-_•_-.•___•--.____..__._.I i 1 .._. 1 ' 121 0.08� I 10.08*1 10 1 0.09.M SL I ---- I I I 1 0 1 ST ...L.._._-_i._ 608 . ISO 1 a5 I I o l 1 I __ ----------- SR .......I I 1 10 1 O 1 0 1 1 C) I I i -•_-___.--I ---EL•--) -------I-----•--I- a ) I O l o I I O I 1' ----------------- ------- ET ) 1600 1 1 1 ) 0.01 * O 1 O 1 0•0 1.1F 1 O 1 0'0 1m -__-_••-__-_••------------------------------•-1 ER ) 1 1 7 ) 1 O 1 1 1 01 ---------•--._._-_--'_.. 1 ----- WL I ) 1 1 14 ) 1 0 1 A I 1 0 1 I ......*I I WT ) 1600 1 1 0 ) 0.03 * 0 1 0 1 O,OS4 1 0 1 0.03 1 ............................................... 33 ) 1 0- 1 3 1 1 1 I _-- 1 [EXISTING I 9-a'I -_.- 1 IEXIST*+ REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PRDPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I C),(y•7 1, _•.-__---- 0 __--I [EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. .-•._.._. ....... •• ....__I -(py I .J....................................................... by Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be _ less than or equal to 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project Description of system iaprovement: CA4220PN i INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: CAMPUS 6 DOVE EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1991 PH • ..................................................•-•.._......._.._....___..--.._..._... . I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICONMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IHovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR 'I' V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVolumc I V/C I I ICapacitylCapacityl. Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Projectl I Ratio i I I I I 1 I I I Volume I 1 I -----------•- •---------- •-••---•-•••••-- •--------••••••--•-...- I NL 1 1600 1 1 55 1 0.031 (0 1 0 1 0• 03 1 0 10•o3 1 -------- -------•--------- --•--•... ..................... I NT I I 6610 1 12 I 1 0 1 I I••-•-•--) 3200 -•-----•--- --- ) 0.23 ....................O.A� ...... 1 1 MR 1 1 68 1 0 1 3 1 1 0 ___________-------_------__________--------------_______________________ I SL 1 1600 1 1 93 1 0.06 I v l 5 I' o.oLn I ao I o.o-t d ----•-••-•------ --•- ------•-•••-----••---------------•••••••-•------••••-----•-•---•---1 ST I 1 1637 1 O 1, BID I 1 0 1 I 3200 ----------------------__ ...... ___ I-••--------------1 1 t0 I o 'I o l -••-•-•-•-I---- I I SR 1 EL ) I 1 7 ) o l d I 1 0 1 I __________________ ................................A............. -1 I ET ) 1600 1 1 3 ) 0.01 • 1 0 1 O. 01 it 1 O 1 O•01�1 _ ...............................................1 9 ) 1 0 1 1 1 1 O 1 I I•--•------•-•._...__-----•------•••••..........................•.-----------..-------_---•-I WL ) I 1 110 ) 1 0 1 10 1 1 0 1 I I----•--- ..................••---------------- --........----.....---.- ..................... WT ) 1600 1 1 3 ) 0.10 • 40 1 0 1 0. 11* 1 0 I 0- 4 ...............................................l 1._.WR ..................I I 45 ) l o l 2 1 I I I I (EXISTING ------•-•--••-•-----------i-.6 1......................... ..................... I•••--•..................•---••-----•-•----------..---.-.---------••----•---- I (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I p.(po 1 1 i........................................................................................... (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. 1 0.(og I Projected + project traffic will be less than or equal to 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project _.__......__ .................................................................... Description of system improvement: i �C APR-14—'94 THU 15:51 ID:NOGLE ONUFER TEL NO:619297-6055 #059 P02 National Car Rental System,Inc. World Headquarters 7700 France Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 66435 612-830.2121 March 29, 1994 National Car Rental 4242&4262 Campus Drive Newport Beach, California OPERATIONAL STATEMENT The primary operation of the National Service Facility will be to clean and maintain rental oars that have boon rented at the Orange County/John Wayne Airport. National's rental cars will be picked up and dropped off at the John Wayne Airport by the customers. National employees will shuttle these returned vehicles to this new facility to be cleaned and refueled, then driven back to the airport by the employees for customer use. No customers are anticipated to drop off or pick up rental cars at this facility. The process for these returned cars will be as follows: They will enter the site from the west approach on Campus Drive and be lined up to be cleaned. The cars will then proceed to the canopy for refueling, vacuuming and topping off of fluids, The next step is to proceed through the car wash bay where the car Is washed using an automatic car wash. The cleaned car is then lined up in the storage area on the east side of the site until it is needed at the airport. The cars will then exit the site from the east approach on to Campus Drive.-- Secondary uses of the facility include housing of National's administration offices, Employee and visitor parking has been provided for these uses. The building will also contain two maintenance bays that will be used to maintain the fleet of rental cars, The maintenance services will consist of oil changes, minor mechanical and electrical repairs and pre-delivery inspections. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT FAX(714) 644-3250 (charge code#2718) Mailing Address: Street Address: P.O.BOX 1768 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92659-1768 Newport Beach,CA 92663 Advance Planning Division Current Planning Division (714) 644-3225 (714) 644-3200 --------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Fax Cover Sheet FROM: DATE: 4 / 29 / 99 Aziz M. Aslami ; Aasociate P1annPr Title TO: Russ Ownfer Business Phone( r,,19 )297_Rng FAXNo. 6( 19 ) 297-8055 Subject: Traffic Study for National Car Rental No. of Pages (excluding cover sheet): 1 ; Special Instructions: I � , L - J a�W Pp�,r KIT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH U P.O.BOX 1768,NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 C'9ClFO R��P PLANNING DEPARTMENT (714) 644-3225 April 29. 1994 Serine Ciandella Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc. 2100 W. Orangewood Avenue, Suite 140 Orange, CA 92668 Subject: Traffic Phasing Ordinance Study for the proposed National Car Rental Facility at 4242- 4262 Campus Drive, Newport Beach (TPO # 97) Dear Ms. Serine: Enclosed please find the 'Proposal Acceptance" for the proposed National Car Rental Facility that would be constructed in the City of Newport Beach. For traffic data or technical questions please contact Rich Edmonston, the City's Traffic Engineer, at (714) 644-3344. The applicant has expressed his concerns for the urgency of the proposed project and demanded a "fast Tracking" process, therefore, please commence the subject traffic study task immediately and complete the study as soon as possible. Should you have any other questions regarding this project, or need additional information, please contact me. Very truly yours, PLANNING DIRECTOR JAMES D. HEWICKER, DIRECTOR By Vl - Aziz Nf Aslarhi Associate Planner F.\WP51\...\A=-A\Traffic\1P0MLet1 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach I,_. i_�� —I'tURIV UI�HIVUG IG 1- 1 i4-9Jv—J-.i;•� nh,l ci D+ i� •.+-1 I,u .Qiv r .vx " ` H16'KlkoyHom and Assaclates, Ina-,. "% y,mi q"pLAW MDG ROHM MrAICOMLTAMO w�. 2100 Wen Ot,nge++•oDdAV<^u•,auAe ND,Orango,CAldemiu DJ6Ra 714•030•1030 F,tt 71493D•D,88 April 27, 1994 Post•It'•brand tax tranemlttal memo 78T1 No►paa„► To Z ro,n� A4VW4c,` John H. Douglas, AICP :, .. Planning Depar(mont U.PI• City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport'Boulevard `0 F"lr / 6K�lr Z� • Newport Beach, CA 92658 Re: proposal to Prepare a Traffic Analysis for Proposed National Car Rental Service Facility on Campus Drive in the City Of Iilewport Dear Mr. Douglas; Thank you for inviting ICimley-ftorn!and Associates, Inc, to submit this proposal to prepare a traffic analysis for the proposed National.Car Rental Service Facility on Campus Drive in the City of Newport circulation is ues Hand wetlook 1 a d to his o has pensive portunity ty totence in wo k with thes ty of Newport Beacic h act QUALMCkTIONS AND STAFFING ICimley-Horn;is a national transportation engineering firm founded in 1961 and ranked among Engineering News Record's top 20 'trampoitatiosi fimts, We have a staff of approximately 350 in 21 offices throughout the Southwest and Southeast,including the western metropolitan areas of Orange County, San Diego, Los Angeles, Las Vegas;Phopnix, Dallas, and Denver. �@lated Exuerlen� ; i — 1. Established by transportation planners and traffic operations speclallsts, our firm afters s national reputation for services-to cities; counties, and other public agencies as well as private-sector clients working with local agencies. Ili Southern California we have provided transportation services for both large, and small-scale studies. _mve particularly relevant efforts,include: ■ Rossmoor Busj4i propertles, County of Orange—Provided traffio impact analysis, parking circuladonrecommendations,TDM program recommendation,and other project - specific analyses fPr 193-acre property located on the corner of one of the busiest intersections in the County: Moulton Parkway and El Toro Road. ■ nolsa Chlca Land ttse Plan„City of IIuntington BeacitlCounty of Orange—Worked closely,wlth City SO County officials and community interest groups to evaluate over 20 alternative development and roadway plans on the controversial Bolsa Chica site. ■ Christ,College Master Plan, City of Irvine Prepared traffic impact analysis for update of th6,c -hrf t College Irvitle Master Plan, .'.Update included General Plan qY . .r•rit4 i . . • . :I y, eh,tlOUe . Si Forl L,udordole • Fort MY•rc • 'ASV,Op '• OMnO, • Od,ndO PhOMl1t.fld,1D�♦8,( COr,•Aleut•TAmp•.V•rn Doath•VInpnI.s•,oh.W,•t Pahn a•wh •I• ''• t re 1 , t 1 a 67 p,utld ' • r, n . . . , r t a .r.. ..aq s y, s:" t .. . '•a n.wt H4 µ...'' _ L1r✓,ra� ..at. ... _.. .... ...,..r. .Mail �iMLLY—riUKN UKtikut ItL ' t— 4—JJ0-9 OG Npl a1 Z)v IVU .Uiu r .U_ j 2 April27, 1994 Mr. John Douglas ning and development of excess campus property for Amendment atttl,pjtoppsed rezo residential use.. :::; AM/PM'Mint-1V1art,I City of LaHabra — Prepared a detailed traffic. analysis for �ig retail conversion of anti o7lstiil corner into an AMIPM Minl-Mart Gas Station. Analysis included a gap study, .study of neighborhood cut-through traffic, and review of on-site and off-site clrc4lettor�constraints. 1 :. ■ Yorba Linda Family�ntulafmnent Center, City of Yorba Linda —Conducted traffic impact snalysis.atid extensive parking study for a proposal to open a family-oriented pizza and biltiarda.faeuity in an existing shopping center. a 1 • 1 1 We have selected the following personnel from our Orange County office with the appropriate related experience in transportation services for planning efforts that may to necessary for this project; • Serine Ciandellgtt,(Pr�Jeet Manager) •8 yes'cs exp ce Traffic modoT(l�ig Trat�c imps analysis ?rnvlconmettta docpmentation - Transportatigl►Dr'nund Management • Susan Rosner(Arialyils'and Support) . 4 Yom expetlance; .. - Trat>9portati4ri�la{uring Traffic impao}.6 ysis lCimley-Horn has,a detailed QA/QC program that is ingrained into our day-to-day practice. We operate with a philosophy that our clients deserve the very best service we can provide. Our QA/QC efforts are guided by a.speclfic Kiruley-horn (}A/QC in which is issued to each Writley-Horn professional, utilized in each project undo'n, d regularly revised/updated. For this project, the key component of our QA/QC effort will be an in-house review by a senior professional,not involved in conducting the project. For this project, Kimley-Horn is assigning Herman Basmaciyan, P.E. to provide in-house QA/QC. Mr. Basmaciyan is a senior transportation engineer with over 20 years of local experience in'all aspects of transportation planning. +' a• i.3:. A vM •{ 1 .r )vC ,. ..rrnr.�w+ww,wr,MNlW in MIMI111M.111i1NFf9d19�.•18111i I{pu111 ;r1Lt'f-riUklV UKnNut c ri4'9 0-J �O hfJ1 4(ti L JJ ivu . uiu r .u , •'w.i. i F 3 April 29, 1994 Mr. John Douglas BACKGROIJ 'D & AI'Y'ROA, T National Car Rental System, Inc••prop9ses to develop the site Asa Service Pao"'ryI serving primarily t e Orange County Alrport.•t: •t The project site is off-silo from.tile Airport, and is proposed to serve as the cleaning and maintenance center for the•National vehicles, ;f ar:rental b° ill typically not come to the site; the cars will be delivered to and picked up froth the airportY National The traffic impact study will need to..Address the amount of traffic to be generated eratted will not the Proposed operation; and Its impact on the,ggxrounding street system. Since the proposed t3' in the same manner as a.typical cat re4tal facility,trip generation estimates will need to be based, input, On practical jXperienco and jud dontt J.•i i The traffic analysis wily be conducted in accordance with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) Guidelines. For purposes of this.,pro'posai; it is assumed dte following seven intersections will require analysia: • MacArthur Boulevard ®,Cultpus Drive MacArthur Boulevard(�, itSd►Street • MacArthur Boulevard(� bores Road Campus Drive?,'ii Bristol'�tr North • us Drive . Brlstol'•Stwt South Camp • Birch Street(�$ristol Stteet•North • Birch Street* ristolSttoot�South i SCOPE OF SERVICES The foilowitlg tasks arQ envlsi0nd for this project: 1. Conduct a sitcNisit of?the proposed site. •�• 2r Meet with City,staff to d�acuss the relevant issues surrounding the proposal, and to obtain traffic counts and any other materials or documentation available. Reach concurrence on final list of .analysis locatiQlts, =4j'pprQa�to analysis. 3, Review traffic counts apd et aluate for reasonableness and accuracy. 4. Observe traffic,flow and tragic patterns on the affected streets: 5. Estimate the amount of traffic to be generatcd by the proposed project, and distribution of the project traffic on the area street system. g, Determine if project Wits 1% criteria at any intersection, and if further analysis-is necessary. v i,,• )! ,• , .., i�! ' ;? :lf��: 1 Y.'• +• .. ..u,.u."' •M•q. _ tlMtl1lMlllllrfNR41n11tM niVILLT'nUiIN U-XM110G IC i t14-7Au-9v00 ni l 4f '.V v 1J •JO IVU .Ulu t' .U4 ,;�y• t • :ii e. 1 Mr. John Douglas 4 April 27, 1994 7. Identify the project IMPK't to;esult from the proposed project. g, If necessary, ldentify the}pidgation measures necessary tb address the Impacts- If present the findings of tha'anoysis in a report. yN The Scope of•Services does not ytelude attendance at any public meetings. If attendance at meettnga is required, they will be billed on.a tittte•and-materials basis, In accordance with the K1m1aY-Iiorn and Associates Hourly Billlt}g Rate Schedule in effect at the time. SCHEDULE We are prepared to begin work.ig3mediately upon receipt of authorlMdOn to proceed. Following receipt of all necessary, data, we wi11,c�lpte our analysis within a two. to.three-weak titneframe. A draft report will be,submitted to you.for your review and comment. .: ..� TEE This estimate assume$that the City of Newport Beach will provide all necessary traffic data and further data collection by Kimley-Hord'Will not be required for analysis of the previously identified seven locations. A breakdown of thig cost,estimate is provided for your information. Estimated �TasJf_ Cos project Start-VP MGM— Existing Conditions ADAYsi8 550.00 project Trip Estimates 850.00 1%Analysis . 550.00 piojeot Impact and h1il;1$ation 1,200.00• Report preparation 1 5 $5,250.00 KHA proposes to cott)plete the tasks outlined above for a lump sum fee of$ 5,250.00. The proposed fee includes labor fees, plus an amount to cover certain direct expenses for the project which would included in-house duplicating, facsimile, local mileage, telephone, postage, in-house blueprinting, and word procesiw'�omputer. As necessary, additional services will be provided for an additional fee basal on curret t;hodrly rates plus direct expenses at a 1.10 multiplier. Billings will be issued on the basis of;percent;uompleteY and will he due and payable within 30 days of invoicing. IM Y i• sf.'. �_•Y~__ —_ ...[b,�,::ttat�FlttA+TlttllSlili.gt 1... •. .n. t\i11Lt1`r1UKH UKrthot IC ( 14-:1dG-J400 hlJt 4( V4 1J •Ji CIU .uiu r .UJ f April 27, 1994 Mr. John Douglas CLOSURE In addition to the matters,set forth,herein,our agreement shaft include and shall be subject to the attached Standard Provisions. The term".the client" as used in the attached'Standard provisions shall refer to The City of Newport Beach: If you concur in the foregoing Arid WiPh to direct us to proceed Wlth the scope outlined, please execute our offices. Fees and the enclosed copy of this letter agreement in the space provided, and return to times stated in this agreement are valid for thirty (30) days after the date of this letter. We appreciate this opportunity to;work'with the City of Newport Beach, and look forward to a successful project. Please call If you havo py 1ue8tions. Sincerely, KIMLF.Y-HORN.AND ASSOCIATES, Inc. . .;.:: GAdt.«s��•'' Cam_ Serino Ciandella , project Manager SAC.MMI NaBcar pro/0494pro cc: Rich FAnonston, Traffic JQ$.InePrlag — .,F , 1 Attachment Stattdard;provist"i I%LI i. . 1994 Agreed to this_. day of, ' City of NeWp rt Beach By: K•. �.56'OG/Az-Er PZA"'J g7r-- printed Namaland TU }' • 1• , .1 � wlTll .x1w 1 s dq { .. ryMr ' 1 '• ,....,�,t s q .+, .b.•� ?. . _.:+? ....�_. .. •., , ., , , •,,,...,•�. , , ,•..,»r dlrF�iHeKNia:tit+iHidl#•iiiiii� APR-26-'94 TUE 12:55 ID:N06LE ONUFER TEL N0:619/297-8055 #110 P01 If you have any questions or problems regarding fax transmission p n 93 please call 619/297-8066. coo coo FAX TRANSMITTAL NOCLE PAGE 1 OF 1 ONJFER ASSOCIATES DATE : n 46144 ARCHITECTS PROTECT' NAME : o 'rb L 239E SA-Diego Ave. PRO FCT a �~ San CA 92110 Tel : (619pwne129?-1 3 9 7-0066 FAX: TO n NeWPOAT `AM , 16141397•HU55 1•714. 6-44• a2rPO - FA%4 FOR YO R : WE TRANSMIT THE FOLLOWING : o 85 ioc Date Description 4G c t.hIr 'a lase pe��►�arcl� 3�,g4. l Was �yh,(W.A a* +W �tm� �Hs� 1 would )U nv'r�fleal in 2 was relar('41&011 uj�o4 1-(f Can K,v plttasQ vtotvtse ...ru ash fig si�►� aMof REMARKS Imps" op Our vt.4j C+e06 �ur�e PlMOA1 t4 mm*S10A )VA rt�? As you ve awi:re, �hMM is 04124 to 'Ke swee s of" pie" tit, BY: n �U�l. � Q�ruF-fie C.C. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT FAX(714) 644-3250 (charge code#2718) Mailing Address: 1, Street Address: P.O.BOX 1768 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach,CA 92659-1768 Newport Beach,CA 92663 Advance Planning Division Current Planning Division (714) 644-322.5 (714) 644-3200 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------; Fax Cover Sheet FROM: DATE: 4 / 27 / 94 Aziz M. Aslami Associate Planner Title ' TO: 1 Russ Ownfer Business Phone ( 619 )297-8066 FAXNo. 619 ) 297-8055 Subject: j Traffic Study for National Car Rental No. of Pages (excluding cover sheet): 5 Special Instructions: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • wm/ey-Horn 0 RECEIVED BY Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. PIAANNIINGDEPARTMEN/�T ENGINEERING,PLANNING,AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS QII I Of NF,.WPORIT BEACH West Orangewood Avenue,Suite 140,Orange,California 92668 714-939-1030 Fax 714-938-9488 AY APR 2 4 9994 PIN 7�8i91ID1Ui12i112t314i516 April 20, 1994 John H. Douglas, AICP Planning Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658 SUBJECT: Proposal to Prepare a Traffic Analysis for Proposed National Car Rental Service Facility on Campus Drive in the City of Newport Dear Mr. Douglas: Thank you for inviting Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to submit this proposal to prepare a traffic analysis for the proposed National Car Rental Service Facility on Campus Drive in the City of Newport Beach. Kimley-Horn and Associates has extensive experience in addressing local traffic impact circulation issues, and we look forward to this opportunity to work with the City of Newport Beach. QUALIFICATIONS AND STAFFING Introduction Kimley-Horn is a national transportation engineering firm founded in 1967 and ranked among Engineering News-Records top 20 transportation firms. We have a staff of approximately 350 in 21 offices throughout the Southwest and Southeast,including the western metropolitan areas of Orange County,San Diego, Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Phoenix, Dallas, and Denver. Related Experience Established by transportation planners and traffic operations specialists, our firm offers a national reputation for services to cities, counties, and other public agencies as well as private-sector clients working with local agencies. In Southern California we have provided transportation services for both large- and small-scale studies. Five particularly relevant efforts include: ■ Rossmoor Business Properties, County of Orange —Provided traffic impact analysis, parking circulation recommendations,TDM program recommendations,and other project - specific nalyses for 193-acre property located on the corner of one of the busiest intersections in the County: Moulton Parkway and El Toro Road. Charlotte . Dallas . Fort Lauderdale . Fort Myers . Las Vegas . Orange . Orlando Phoenix.Raleigh.Sarasota.Stuart.Tampa.Vero Beach.Virginia Beach.West Palm Beach B ul l di ng cl l and re l a t l o n s h l ps a n c e 1967 Mr. Herb Vargas 2 November 1, 1993 ■ Bolsa Chica Land Use Plan, City of Huntington Beach/County of Orange—Worked closely with City and County officials and community interest groups to evaluate over 20 alternative development and roadway plans on the controversial Bolsa Chica site. ■ Christ College Master Plan, City of Irvine — Prepared traffic impact analysis for update of the Christ Coliee Irvine Master Plan. Update included General Plan Amendment and proposed rezoning and development of excess campus property for residential use. ■ AM/PM Mini-Mart, City of Lahabra — Prepared a detailed traffic analysis for conversion of an existing retail corner into an AM/PM Mini-Mart Gas Station. Analysis included a gap study, a study of neighborhood cut-through traffic, and review of on-site and off-site circulation constraints. Yorba Linda Family Entertainment Center, City of Yorba Linda — Conducted traffic impact analysis and extensive parking study for a proposal to open a family- oriented pizza and billiards facility in an existing shopping center. taff;n We have selected the following personnel from our Orange County office with the appropriate related experience in transportation services for planning efforts that may be necessary for this project: • Serine Ciandella (Project Manager) - 8 years experience - Traffic modelling - Traffic impact analysis - Environmental documentation - Transportation Demand Management • Susan Rosner (Analysis and Support) - 4 years experience - Transportation planning - Traffic impact analysis Ouality Assurance/Quality Control Kimley-Horn has a detailed QA/QC program that is ingrained into our day-to-day practice. We operate with a philosophy that our clients deserve the very best service we can provide. Our QA/QC efforts are guided by a specific Kimley-Hom QA/QC manual which is issued to each Kimley-Horn professional, utilized in each project undertaken, and regularly revised/updated. For this project, the key component of our QA/QC effort will be an in-house review by a senior professional not involved in conducting the project. For this project, Kimley-Hom is assigning Herman Basmaciyan, P.E. to provide in-house QA/QC. Mr. Basmaciyan is a senior transportation engineer with Mr. Herb Vargas 3 November 1, 1993 over 20 years of local experience in all aspects of transportation planning. BACKGROUND & APPROACH National Car Rental System, Inc. proposes to develop the site as a Service Facility, serving primarily the Orange County Airport. The project site is off-site from the Airport, and is proposed to serve as the cleaning and maintenance center for the National vehicles. Car rental customers will typically not come to the site; the cars will be delivered to and picked up from the airport by National personnel. The traffic impact study will need to address the amount of traffic to be generated by to proposed operation, and its impact on the surrounding street system. Since the proposed facility will not function in the same manner as a typical car rental faclity, trip generation estimates will need to be based, in part, on practical experience and judgment. The traffic analysis will be donducted in accordance with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance (ITO) Guidelines. For purposes of this proposal, it is assumed that four to six intersections will be analyzed. The final list of analysis locations will be finalized through discussions with City staff. SCOPE OF SERVICES The following tasks are envisioned for this project: 1. Conduct a site visit of the proposed site. 2. Meet with City staff to discuss the relevant issues surrounding the proposal, and to obtain traffic counts and any other materials or documentation available. Reach concurrence on final list of analusis locations, and approach to analysis. 3. Review traffic counts and evaluate for reasonableness and accuracy. 4. Observe traffic flow and traffic patterns on the affected streets. 5. Estimate the amount of traffic to be generated by the proposed project, and distribution of the project traffic on the area street system. 6. Determine if project meets 1% criteria at any intersection, and if further analysis is necessary. 7. Identify the project impact to result from the proposed project. 8. If necessary, identify the mitigation measures necessary to address the impacts. 9. Present the findings of the analysis in a report. The Scope of Services does not include attendance at any public meetings. If attendance at meetings is required, they will be billed on a time-and-materials basis, in accordance with the Kimley-Horn and Associates Hourly Billing Rate Schedule in effect at the time. Mr. Herb Vargas 4 November 1, 1993 SCBEDULE We are prepared to begin work immediately upon receipt of authorization to proceed. Following receipt of all necessary data, we will complete our analysis within a two- to three-week timeframe. A draft report will be submitted to you for your review and comment. FEE This estimate assumes traffic data collection and analysis of six locations. A breakdown of this cost estimate is provided for your information. Estimated Task Cost Project Start-Up $600.00 Traffic Counts 1,000.00 Existing Conditions Analysis 450.00 Project Trip Generation/Distribution Estimates 850.00 1% Analysis 450.00 Project Impact and Mitigation 1,000.00 Report Preparation 1,500.00 $5,5850.00 YHA proposes to complete the tasks outlined above for a lump sum fee of$ 5,850.00. The proposed fee includes labor fees, plus an amount to cover certain direct expenses for the project which would included in-house duplicating, facsimile, local mileage, telephone, postage, in-house blueprinting, and word processing computer. As necessary, additional services will be provided for an additional fee based on current hourly rates plus direct expenses at a 1.10 multiplier. Billings will be issued on the basis of percent complete, and will be due and payable within 30 days of invoicing. CLOSURE In addition to the matters set forth herein, our agreement shall include and shall be subject to the attached Standard Provisions. The term"the client' as used in the attached Standard Provisions shall refer to The City of Newport Beach. If you concur in the foregoing and wish to direct us to proceed with the scope outlined, please execuite the enclosed copy of this letter agreement in the space provided, and return to our offices. Fees and times stated in this agreement are valid for thirty (30) days after the date of this letter. Mr. Herb Vargas S November 1, 1993 We appreciate this opportunity to work with the City of Newport Beach, and look forward to a successful project. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, KMMEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES, Inc. I)erine Ciandella Project Manager SAC.numn Natkarpro/o494pro cc: Rich Edmonston, Traffic Engineering Attachment: Standard Provisions Agreed to this day of , 1994 City of Newport Beach By: Printed Name and Title ' v KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. • STANDARD PROVISIONS (1) Scope of Services The undertaking of the Engineer to perform professional services under this Agreement extends only to those services specifically described herein. However,if requested bythe Client and agreed to bythe Engineer,the Engineer will perform additional services('Additional Services')hereunder and shall be compensated therefore as set forth below. In addition,the Engineer is authorized to perform Additional Services for which the Engineer will be similarly compensated for those services arising due to emergencies,errors or other unanticipated actions by the Client's cenlrador(s),revised regulations governing the Engineers services,and when,in the Engineers opinion,Additional Services are advisable as a result of other factors required by other authorities and such Additional Services are clearly in the Chenl's interest and advance authorization cannot be obtained. In the event of the performance of such Additional Services,the Engineer will notify the Client as soon as practical of the necessity and inception of the services. (2)Client's Responsibilities In addition to my responsihilities specifically described herein,the Client shall have the fallowing responsibilities to the Engineer. (a) OceIgnale in writing a person to ad as his representative with respect to this Agreement,such person having complete authority to transmit instructions,resolve information,and make or interpret the Client's decisions. (b) Provide all information and criteria as to the Climes requirements,objectives,and expectations for the project.These data shall include all numerical criteria that are to be met and ell standards of development,design,or construction that ere to be followed. (c) Provide to the Engineer all previous studies,plans,or other documents pertaining to the prolecl and all new data reasonably necessary,in the Engineers opinion,such as site survey and engineering data,environmental impact assessments or statements,zoning or other Ind use regulations,etc„upon on all of which the Engineer may rely. (d) Arrange for access to the she and other private or public property as required for the Engineer to provide the services under this Agreement. (a) Review all documents or verbal reports presented by the Engineer and render In wining decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to daisy the services of the Engineer. (p Furnish approvals and permits from govemmenlal authorities havinglurisdiclion overthe project and approvals nd consents from other parties as may be necessary for compel on of the Engineers services. (g)Provide such idepademaccount(ng,legal,insurance,codestlmafng,and overall feasiblfityservices beyond the scopeefthisAgre iment as the Client maymquireorthe Engineer may reasonably request with regard to the professional fields listed above. (h) Give prompt written notice to the Engineer whenever the Client becomes aware of my development that affects the scope and timing of the Engineers services or my defector noncompliance in my aspect of the ProjecL (q Bear all costs incident to the responsibildies of the Client. (3) Period of Services Unless otherwise provided herein,the Engineer volt begin work promptly after receipt of a fully executed copy of this Agreement and,union specified otherwise herein,shall complete the services within a reasonable length of time. The provisions of this section and the compensation to the Engineer Included in this Agreement have been agreed to In anticipation of a continuous and orderly progress through the completion of the Engineers services. (a) Times forpetformance agreed to herein shall be extended to the extent necessary for delays due to natural disasters,strikes,orotherdreumstnces over which the Engineer has no control. (b) If the Engineers services am delayed or suspended In whole or in pad,the times of performance shall be extended to the extent of such delay or suspension;such suspension shall nottemlmda this Agreement unless the Engineer elects to terminate bywriten notice in accordance with dharprovislons of this Agreement Ifsuchdelaybrsuspensionextends - for more than six months(cumulatively)for reasons beyond the Engineers control,the various miss of compensation provided for elsewhere in this Agreement shall be subject to renegotiation. (4) Compensation for Services Unless specifically agreed to herein,the following standard provsions as to compensation amounts shall be applicable. (a) The Engineer shall be compensated in U.S.dollars for the services specifically described herein In accordance herewith. (b) If the Engineer performs Additional Services,the Client shall pay the Engineer ferthe pedornnse of those Services an amount(in addition to all other amounts payable under this Agreement)based upon the Engineers current hourly rates for the actual time spent by the Engineer in providing such Adddlonal Services plus an amount to cover certain direct expenses for the project which would indudo In-house duplicating,facsimile,legal mileage,telephone,postage,in-home blueprinting and word processing. In addition,other tired expenses will be billed at 1.15 times costs.Technical use of computers for analysis,design graphics,sto.,will be billed at$25.00 per hour. Ifc) In wineporon to mounts pa ablelerb the Client ttore the to such mounts. the Client shall be invoiced for and shall Pay to the Engineer in accordance with Paragraph(5)all taxes, lev ed with (6) Payments for Services Compensation shall be paid to the Engineer in accordance with the following Provisions: (a) Invoices will be submitted bythe Engkeerto the Client monthly for services performed and expenses incurred pursuant to this Agreement during the priormonth. Paymntofeach such invoice will be due within twenty-five(25)days of the receipt thereof. Aservice charge will be added to delinquent accounts at the maximum rate allowed bylaw for each month of delinquency. (b) If the Client fails to make any payment due the Engineer for services and expenses within thirty(30)days afterthe Engineers transmittal of its invoice therefor,the Engineer may, afar giving seven(7)days'written notice to the Client,suspend services under this Agreement until all amounts due hereunder are paid In full. (c) In the event any invoice or any portion thereof remains unpaid for more than sixty(60)days fallowing the invoice dale,the Engineer may initiate collection proceedings to collect the same and recover,in addition to all amounts due and payable Including accrued interest,its reasonable collectlonfeesnd otherexpenses mlatedto the proceeding.Such expenses shall Include,but shall not be limited to,the cost,determined at the Engineers normal hourly billing rates,of the time devoted to such proceeding by he employees. (d) The Client acknowledges and agrees that the payment forservices rendered and expenses incurred bythe Engineer pursuant to this Agreement is not subject to any contingency or conditions unless expressly set forth in this Agreement. (6)Reuseof Documents AM documents,Inclding but not limited to drawings,specifications and data or programs stored electronically,prepared bythe Engineer pursuanito this Agreement are related exclusively to the services described herein. They are not Intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by the Client or others on extensions of this proled or on any other project.Arty muse without written verification oradaptation bythe Engineerto spedfepurposes Intended will beat the Client's sole risk and without lability or legal exposure to the Engineer, and the Client shall kxlemnlfyad hold the Errgieerharmless tram all claims,damages,losses and expenses,Including but not limited to attomeya'fees,arising out of or resufing therefrom. Any such verification or adaptation will entitle the Engineer to further compensation at rates to be agreed upon by the Client and the Engineer. (7) Opinions of Cost (a) Since the Englneer has no control overthe cost of tabor,materials,equipment or services famished by others,or over methods of delenining prices,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,any and all opinions as to costs rendered hereunder,including bud not limited to opinions as to the casts of construction and materials,shall be made an the basis of its experience and qualifications and represent its best judgment as an experienced and qualified professlonal engineer,familiar with the wnsta loon Industry;but the Engineer cannot and does et guarantee that proposals,bids or actual costs will not vary from opinions of cost prepared by IL if at any time the Client wishes greater assurance as to the amount of any cest,he shall employ an independent cost estlmstur to make such delerminallon. Engineering services required to bring costa within any limitation established by the Client will be paid for as Additional Services hereunder by the Client. (b) If a limit with respect to condnwiln or other costs is established by written Agreement between the Client and the Engineer,the following will apply. C11 The acceptance by the Client at any time during the performance,of services hereunder of a revised opinion of probable cod in excess of the then established cost Iimf will constitute a corresponding revision in the previously agreed cost lima to the extent indicated in such revised opinion. (IQ Any cod limit so established shall be Increased by a bidding contngency,of ten percent unless mother amount is established in writing. (iii) The Engineerwill be permitted to determine what materials,equipment,componentsyslems ndtypes of construction are to be Included in the drawings and specifications prepared by it pursuant hereto and to make reasonable adjustments In the extent of the project to bring it within the cod limit. (iv) if the bidding or negotiating phase of the project ties not commenced within six(6)months after the completion of the Engineers design hereunder,the established cost Iimf will not be biding on the Engineer,and the Client shall consent to an adjustment in such cost lima commensurate with my applicable change in the general level of prices in the construction industry between the date of completion of the Engineers design hereunder and the date on which proposals or2bids�riz une toflalin or (v) If the lowest bona fide propose]or bid exceeds the established cod Iimf,the client shall(1)give written approval to increase such cost limit,( ) negotiating rebidding the project within a reasonable time,or(3)cooperate in revising the projects extent or quality. In the case of(3),the Enguoer shall,without additional charge, to bring the cast n the st firrift. The service will be the limit of tmodify the he Engineers responsib dys and specifications ntthis regard and,having done so,txeEngineer prepared by it hereunder as shall be enitledtoto paymntlforits services inin accordnding of ce with this AgreementAgreementand shall have no further liability hereunder. (8) Termination The obligation to provide fudher see under this Agreement maybe laminated by either party upon*,(7)days'written notice in the event of substantial failure by the ooerparty to perform in accordance with the tonns hereof through no fault of the terminating party. In the event of any termination,the Engmeorwill be paid for all services rendered to the data of lamination.all expenses subject to reimbursement herdunder,and other reasonable expenses Incurred by the Engineer as a result of such termination. In the event the Engineer's compensation under this Agreement Is a fixed tee,upon such lamination the amount payable to the Engineer for services rendered will be a proportional amount of the total too based on the rare of the amount of the wady done,as reasenably dolannined by the Engineer,to the total amount of work which was to have been performed,less pnor partial payments,if any,which have been made. (9) Liability The Engineer is protected byWodmrs'Compensation lnsuranco(androromployer's liabileyinsumnce).professional babildy insurance,and by pubticilability insurance for bodily injury and property damage and will furnish cedificates of insurance upon request. The Enginceragress to hold the Client harmless from loss,damage,Injury,or liability arising directly and to the extent from the negligent ads or amissons of the Engineer,its employees,agents,subcontractors and Ihalrempbyees and agents but only to the extent that the same is equally covered and paid under the foregoing policies of insurance. If the Cuero specifically directs the Engineer to obtain increased Insurance cave,mge,or it the nalum of the Engineer's actNkos requires additional Workers'Compensation or similar insurance coverage,the Engineer will lake out such additional Insurance,It obtainable,at the Cllenrs expense (10) Slandard of Coro In perforating ris protosslonal services heeunder,the Engtnoor will am that dagem of com and skllt odiaadly exercised,underskmllarclax malances;by mputabto members of its profession practicing in the same or similar locality. No other womanly.express or implied,is made or Intended by the Engineer's undotakfng hereln or its performance of services hereunder. It is agreed that M accordance with and subject to the provisions of the foregoing paragraph(9),the Client will beak any and all liability,claim for damages,cost of defense,oraxponsea to be levied against the Enginearon account of any and WI design defects,oams,emissions,or professional negrgence,to the mount actually pail in compensation for,or with rasped to,such liability,claim,cost,or expense under any polity or policies of professional liability Insurance maintained by the Engineer. Further,the Client agrees to notify any centractororsubcenlradorwho may portion work In connection with any design,report,or study prepared by the Engineer of such limitation fordelocis,orrera,omissions,or professional negligence,and require as a condition precedent to his(orris)performance of such work an Identical limitation of liability on his(or its)part ns against the EngInter.ln the event the Clam falls to obtain an oamical limitation of liabilitypmvlsion as to defects or negligence,the Client shall Mentally and hold the Engineer harmless for any liability related to offer,omissions,or ad of pofessonal negligence In such a memerand to such"am that the aggregate liability of the Engineer,indudirig awards and costs assossed by my medietomadaitmtorforsuch dated or neggganrs to or parties Including the Client,shall not exceed the aforementioned amount Undorno cicomstanoss shall the Engkwer bo liable for extra Costs or other conseghronCos due to changed cenddons or for costs related to the failure of the contractor or mate riaMren to install work In accordance with the plans and specifications. (11) Means B Methods of Contractors The Engineer shall have no authority coverer rosponsblydyfortho mome,methods,tachniques,sequences orprowdurea of construction selected byconYmdor(s),forsaletyprocamons and programs incidentto the work of contractor(s)orformy'failure of Contoclor(s)to complywah laws,rules,regulations,ordinances,codmoronors applicable to contractor(s)furnishing and performing their work (12) Expanses of Litigation In the event litigation in anyway related to the services parforrod hereunder is Initiated against the Engincerby the Cllan4 its contractors,orsubcontmdom, and such fdigalon concludes with the entry of a final judgment favorable to the Engineer the Client shall mimbume the Engineer forall of its roaeongblo altomeys'fens and otherexpensos related losald Idigation. Sudi expenses shall Include,but shall net be ranked to,the cost,dotornined at the Engineer's normal houdy billing miss,of the time devoted to such litigation by the Engineer's employees. (13) Arbitration AN claims,counieclaMhs,disputes,and other matters In question between the Client and the Enginserarising out ofthis Agreementarths broach thereof shag be decided by biding arbitration In accordance with the Construction Industry flutes of lho American Arbitration Association then obtaining,at the solo dodolon of Iho Engineer. Notice of demand for arbitration mud be riled in writing with the other party to this Agreement and with the American Arbitration Assodaton no Wier it=that dale when Institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim,dispule,or other mmor M question would be barred by the applicable statute of IMltatons.In addition,no arbitration proceedings shag Include by consolidation,joinder,orin anyot hermamer,myparly of erthan the Clionlandthe Engineer,and arbitration M nupectof aspodgcallydesoibod claim,counterclaim,disputaorothermater In question shag net be expanded to Include any other Issue.The restrictions of the pravous scale=as to parties to and Issues of the arbitration proceedings may be amandod by spectra written approval of the Client and the Engineer for each exception. (14) Hazardous Substances It Is understood and agreed that In seeking the professional sonkes of the Engineer under this Agreement,the Client does not request the Engineer to undertake to perform any services,studies,or into,or to make any tlaleffmatons Involving hazardous substances,as dented by federal law.Therefore,the Engineer undertakes no such obligation hereunder,and the Client agrees to hold harmless,Indemnity,and defend the Engineer from and against any and all claim,asses,damages,lWugky,and costa adskg out of orM anywaycoenected with the presence,disdarge,mime,orescapo of contaminants orhazallous substances of anykind,aronvimrcnemal liabifityof anyratues,in any mannermlatod to serAm parfoffmod by Iho Engineer undmthla Agroement if any condition regarding ahazardous substance,Including but not Untried masbostos,Is observed bytes Engfrhearoroegoged during the course of the performance of the saviors hereunder,the Engineer slag have the tight to Coosa all sorvkss until the hazardous substance condition has boon eliminated. That Engineer shall have the responsibility to notify the Client of any such condition of which tha Engineer becomes aware,and the Client shall be solely responsible far the elimination of the hazardous substance condition.Iftheservkes to be performed bytho Engineerhomundarcgnnat be performed becausooflhaexistenw of the hawdoussubslenco condition,the existence of the condition shall be deemed to be a substantial failure on the pin of the Client to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement,though no fault of the Engineer,for the purposes of termination under paragraph(8): (15) Beneficiaries,Assignment and Subcontracting Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits M this Agreement to anyone other than the Client and the Engineer,and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Client and the Engtneerand not for the benefit .of any otherpaty.Nekherthe Clientnorthe Engineershallassign,sublal,orlmnslerany rights underor interests InthIsAgreemem without the written consent of the other.However,nothing contained hereinshall prevent ermstrict gat Engineer from employing Independent professional associates orconsultants asthe Engineer mayck m appropriate toassist In the performance of services hereunder. (16) Confidentiality The Client hereby cons"to the use and dissemination by the Engineer of photographs of the Project and to to use by the Engineer of facts,data and Information obtained by the Engineer In the mutkho performance of the services hereunder. Notwithstanding Ile fomgoing,with rasped to any facts,data oroformation specifically Identified In writing by the Client,the Engineer shall use reasonable cam to maintain the confidentiality of such idonllfcd malarial. (17) Controlling Law This Agreement is to be govamed by the law of the Slato of California. (18) Binding Efiost This Agreement shag bind,and the benefits thereof shall Inum to to respective parties hereto,their legal mprasonWlives,mocutors,adminisualom,succossom and assigns. (19) Limit of Liability In recognition of the reform risks and benefits oftha project to both to Client and the Design Professional,the risks have been allowed such that the Client agrees. to the fulled extend permitted by law,to fimk the liability of the Design Professional to the Client on the pmjod for any and all claims,losses,costs,damages of any nature whatsoever or claims expenses from any cause or causes,so that the total aggregate liability of the Design Professiopal shall net exceed the Design Professionsfs fee for sonkes received on this projeot Such claims and causes Include,but are not hauled to negligence,professional orrora or omissions,sidd liability,breach of contract or warranty. (20) Mergar,Amendment This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the Engineerand the Client,and negollalions,wmlm,and oral understandings between the parties am merged herein. This Agreement can be supplemented andrer amended only by a written dochmient executed by both the Engineer and the Client. (21) Soverability,and Waiver of Provisions Any provision in this Agreement that is prohibited or unenforceable In anyjurisdicton shall,as to such judsdkllm,be ineffective to the edam of such prohgbkon or un rnorceabtky without kwafdating the remainkg provisions hereof or affici the validity or enforceability of such prevision In any olherjutsdicllo. Also,the non, enforcement of arty prevision by either party shall not constitute a waiver of that provision nor shall it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remainder of this Agreement. DATE TIME Fo WHILE OU WERE OUT OF / PHONE NO`�/(/�(/f7�fZ EXT. TELEPHONED lel<l PLEASE CALL RETURNED YOUR CALL WILL CALL AGAIN CAMEINTO9EEYOU ENT MESSAGE d=�is�� 7T <.S's BY CITY OF NEWORT BEACH CASH RECEIPT NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92663 39191 RECEIVED BY:CM CUSTOMER:NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SYS I MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS 0102243 CO FILING FEES 010-2243 $50. 00 MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS 0102300 MISC TRAFFIC STD 010-2300 $67385. 00 TOTAL DUE t sEY435.00 CASH PAID CHECK PAID CHECK NO TENDERED CHANGE $. 00 $6,433.QO 618,1181- $6, 435. 00 $. 00 DATE - 04/2'8'/'q-j---Tl-ME- �i4,20:57 DATE TIME FOR- WHILE YOU WERE OUT 1 M I OF PHONE NO. ,6�Fr EXT. TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL RETURNED YOUR CALL WILL CALL AGAIN CAME IN TO SEE YOU O�URGENT MESSAGE (\ / /By �G��- SlW-C�cl� (-�n��..w�(� � � � , 9 � � W � f i � � NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SYSTEM, INC. 7700 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435 INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE I HER NO. GROSS AMOUNT -OUNIT NET AMOUNT TRAFFIC 04 27 94 6435.00 �Z %:Natidn l National Car Rental System,Inc Cdqurters arRentalopD France Wrd Avenue South Minneapolis,Minnesota 55435 (612)893-6433 Timothy W.Johnson Director Facility Planning CHECK NO CHECK DATE VENDOR NUMBER I VENDOR NAME cHECKAMOUNT 6181181 04 27194 1 T0471 I CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $***%r***6,435.00 EfA H iE (10SITING CH K r , ONVIRONHF:NT.AL INFORHARION FORS( 0 City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA 92663 (714) 644-3225 A. General Information 1. Applic ant/Agent:_NOGLE ONUFER ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, INC. phone: (619) 297-8066 Address; 2398 SAN DIEGO AVENUE, SAN DIEGO; CA 92110 2. Property Owners SHATTUCK FAMILY TRUST WILLIAM N. SHATTUCK,Phones (714)756,-150 —c/o TRUSTEE Jip Address: 4242 CAMPUS DRIVE. NEWPQgT BEACH, CA 92660 B. proiect Descr ption Please attach the following materials for the project: • Vicinity map • Plans drawn to scale • Proposed revisions to zoning map • At least 3 different site photos mount d and text using underlie and on 8 1/2 X 11 cardboard with a key map g l eeout notation, if applicable showing the photo locations and direction of view 1. Project name: NATIONAL CAR RENTAL 2. Project locations 4242 & 4262 CAMPUS DRIVE, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 N217-111 - 06 3. Assessor's parcel €: JT"1-17-1 ^o,_ 4. Permit application ifs 5a. Proposed use; CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY 5b. Project size (dwelling units, gross floor area, etc. ) 2,982SF 5o. site size: 58,000SF 5d. Building heights 17!0" 6. Existing land use designations: General Plan: Zonings M I•A Specific Plan: LCP 7. Previous governmental approvals: _ ^ B. other governmental approvals required: Federal: State: _ Regional: Locals 1 JULY 1, 1994 Estimated occu anc s NOVEMBER 1, 1994 9. Begin conatructic:f: F Y (date) (date) C. potential Environmental Effects On a separate page, please provide the' following information. if the question is not applicable, indicate "Not applicable" or "None". 1. Earth Please describe the earthwork that will be required for the project. Include grading quantities, and the location of borrow or stockpile sites, and haul routes, if applicable. Describe any geotechnical or soils investigations that have be n conducted. include exhibits showing existing and proposed topography, retaining walls, and erosion control devices. 2. Air Describe any air emissions or odors that could result from the project, including emissions during construction, and any measures that are proposed to reduce these emissions. 3. Water Describe existing and proposed site drainage, and measures that will be employed to reduce erosion and prevent contaminated runoff from entering the storin drain system, groundwater or surface water.. Describe any changes that could occur in groundwater levels or bodies of surface water. Is the project located in a flood hazard zone? 4. Biological Resources •• Describe 'the existing vegetation on the site, and any trees or large shrubs that are to be removed. Identify any fish or wildlife that inhabit the cite. d ool �U "J4 1:.:ib •.I lb - !+F U•, i c,ri F.4/4 Describe any sources of noise that impact the site, and any Oise-generating equipmen that will be utilized on the property, either during construction or after occupancy, What means to reduce noise impacts on surrounding proportion or building occupants ar proposed? 6. Light and Glare Describe exterior lighting that is proposed for the project and means that will b utilized to reduce light and glare impacts o:: surrounding properties. 7. Land Use Describe: a) the existing land uses and structures on the project site and on adjacent parcels; b) the projects conformance with existing land use plane and regulations fe the property; and c) its compatibility with surrounding land uses. 8. Public_Health and afet Identify any aspects of the project that could present a risk to public health due t normal operations, or due to an explosion or the release of hazardous substance (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the even of an accident or spill. is there any possibility that the site could be contaminate due to previous uses or dumping? If so, what measures are proposed to eliminate the hazard or contamination? 9. populationLHoueing/Emplovment a. If the project is residential, please explain how the project will comply wit the affordable housing policies contained in the Housing Element of the Genera Plan, and the average household size expected. b. If the project is commercial, industrial, or institutional, please identify the tenants and/or uses and the estimated number of employees. 10. Transportation/Circulation/Parking Please describe how the project will comply with parking regulations, and identify an changes or improvements to the circulation system that are proposed as part of the project. 11. Public Sery cea til t es Please identify whether adequate capacity currently exists for the following public services and utilities. If expansion is needed, explain how it will be accomplished Please attach any written confirmation of capacity you have received from service providers. • Communications Systems • Electrical power • Fire protection • Natural gas • Parka/recreational facilities • police protection • schools • sewer systems or septic tanks • Solid waste and disposal • Storm water drainage systems 1 12. bestheticp Describe whether the project could potentially obstruct any scenic vista or view Opel to the public, or create an aesthetically offensive site open to public view. Coul the project block any private views?, 13. Cultural and Historic Aesoyrcea Please indicate whether any archaeological or paleontological surveys have been don on the site. Could the project result in any adverse physical or aesthetic effects t any building, structure, or object having historical, cultural, or religious significance? , CortificatL6 I certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached• exhibits are correct an complete to the beet of my knowledge and belief. I am the legal owner of the property that is the subject of this application or have been authorized by the owner to act on his behal regarding this application. I further acknowledge that y false etatements or informatio presented herein may result in the revocation of any a oval or permit granted on the bass of this information. X OoWA 0A wT 5; , 46e;.F- k Print name of owner or representative gnature bisee �O.YC C C '1 Y3 .- .. .- 3 C Oii A F •- • L •• For Office Use Date filed:. Fee: Receipt No: Sy:_ f:\...\JO\FORMS\ENY•INF0. Rev. 2194 1. Earth Existing topography will basically remain the same. Existing AC paving/and construction will be removed in its entirety with new AC paving and service building being installed. Finish grading only will be performed. 2. Air No adverse air emissions are expected other than those caused during construction by normal construction vehicles, and during occupancy by new cars being shuttled off and on the site. 3. Water Existing site drainage sheet flows thru (2) curb cut openings onto Campus Drive. Said overall site drainage pattern will remain except for minor modifications to direct sheet flow to new central curb cut opening verses existing (2) curb cut openings. If required by City, site water will be collected into catch basins and discharged directly into storm sewer system. The new facility will have a self-contained recycling car wash, and will also have an oil interceptor for all interior drains, etc. 4. Biological Resources Site has no major vegetation or wildlife. 5. Noise No adverse noise is expected other than that caused during construction by normal construction vehicles, equipment, etc.; and during occupancy by new cars being shuttled off and on the site. Minor servicing of new vehicles during occupancy will occur within the service building. A masonry fence will be installed along Campus which will diminish the incoming traffic noise as well as any site generated noise. 6. Light and Glare Site lighting will be accommodated by approximately (4) 30' tall standards with metal halide cut-off fixtures, and under-canopy lights. Metal halide is requested due to color rendition of rental cars. Said light layout will be engineered at time of working drawings complete with photometric layout. Light throws will be directed downward only, and will be engineered to cut off at properly lines/fences. 7. Land Use Existing land contains (2) 1 story office buildings and AC parking lots. New construction will be similar with (1) 1 story service building and the remainder of the site being utilized for parking of rental vehicles. New facility will include: administration office, automobile maintenance, car washing, and refueling operations. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding light industrial and general office use as allowed by the existing M1A zoning. 8. Public Health and Safety No adverse effects to the public health and safety is expected. The new car wash facility is a closed system utilizing recycled water, the interior floor drains discharge into an oil interceptor, and the new fueling pumps, etc. are triple lined, etc. per EPA standards. No existing contaminated soils are anticipated due to present use of property; however, should any contaminated soils, materials, etc. be discovered, they will be removed/disposed as required by all local, state, and federal laws/codes. 9. Population/Housing/Employment The project will maintain a small administrative staff of 2-3 people, a small service staff of 2-3 people, and a small staff of drivers. Maximum staff at any one time is expected to be in the range of 10 employees. 10. Transportation/Circulation/Parking The project contains on-site parking for approximately 180 vehicles. The administrative area of 1,230SF requires approximately 5 spaces (1/250SF). The remaining service area of 1,750SF requires approximately 5 spaces (3/1000SF). As shown on the attached site plan, 10 spaces will be provided for employees and 4 spaces for visitors. The internal circulation is shown on the attached site plan. 11. Public Services/Utilities Existing utilities are adequate for intended use. 12. Aesthetics No adverse aesthetics are anticipated. A new decorative masonry wall with security gate and landscape strip will be installed alongside Campus/ and a new 6'0" tall chain link fence with vinyl slats will be installed on the interior property lines. The proposed service building will be setback from the street to minimize sight lines. 13. Cultural and Historic Resources No cultural or historic resources are evident/effected. ILA!J -IS-Aid b fSS t�LL 6,c;gT y6, 2kf41 7s75 - s a..i DMCRIP'TION Lots 25 and 26 of Tradt no. 3201, in the pity of Newport Seaoh, County of Granger state of Calitornia, as PeY iiaP Recorded in Hack 1301 pages 25 to 30 inclusive of Xiscellaneoae Napa, in the office of the county Recorder of said county. =C n any and all oil, oil rights, minerals, mineral righte, natural gas rights, and other hydrocarbons by whaL•aoever name known, geothermal steam, and all Products derived from any of the foragoin9, that may ba within or under the land, together with the perpetual right Of drilling. mining, exploring and operating therefor and etorinff in and removing the game from the Sand er any other land, including the right to whipstock or dire sub ctionally drill and mitre from latrda other than those s hereby, oil or gas wells, tunnels and shafts into, through or across the subsuurfarfa ce of the land, and to bottom such whipatocked or directionally drilled wells, tunnels sad ahafta under and beneath or beyond the exterior limits thereof, and to radrill, yytunr»1, equip. maintain, rapair, da4open and operate any such wells ar mines; i. ore without, however, the right to drill, mina, store, ex fan and operate through the aurfacn or the upper 500 A t33ohigsn of e subougfftafi corperaf th tinn,ore-ordld 70bruaryn78 e1992 as d in • paw frca The Irvine Companyr instrument No. 92-122266, official Records. ALrip E&CgpT say and all water, rights or interests therein, no matter how acquired by Oragtor in connection with or with respect to the land, Amster, and owned or used er, together with the right and power to erplore, drill, redrill, zameve and store the ts Same from the land or to divert or otherwise utilize such water, riShtO hts or ehallLbe on any other property owned of leased by Grantor, whether suchwaterrig adjudicated, riwisni overlying, appropriative, littoral, Percolating, prescriptive, statutory or contractual► but without, however, any tight to enter upon the surface of the land in the exercise of ouch righte, as reaervad1in the Do"inst fromtThe Irvine Codpany, A Michigan corporation, recorded iabruarl 28,92-122266, OfticLKI Records. To '�' Company FAX •— Phone From Companv.—.— Fax Phon- .CoL� �33. Nun,"of R19-5, - ' '.,y p ,g xaYSf�tla Oa DVki,k rJdEC 80 166 '6'z '00 TOO'Bbdd SS09L636T9T6 01 UH--lU037 93I183dO'Jd WOJd £h:LT *1 6E dUW ITPAMO, S u my, / ��'''`•' J ' ; � - ;. - '�% 1" '�' ;� 'y -� 'FUR,- „ r'-' �" _ i. ' 'ry ' � r . -NATIONAL..CAR RENTAL ./'. � - ' ,' '! . f;�' t �.- � " -••t ,.fit - _ -_, � 1/ - � . .i �.. J r 5ERVICE FAI�MI,TYtV I, ' IPreparedfoT'i '•_ ? ;City of Newpdrt Beach'. t' Prepared Kimjey,Horn'and'.Associate' Inc. I ' i y - ' . - • . - I NN��G' �' 7BEpC - .f• . .-` _ . ' t, ;� . � ��!�, III ' . , 'r / � (•1 /.: , '• ice'. I 1 1 ' TRAFFIC STUDY ' FOR ' NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY ' Prepared for ' The City of Newport Beach Prepared by ' Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1 ' m May 1994 r TABLE OF CONTENTS ' INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 TRIP GENERATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ' TRIP DISTRIBUTION ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ' TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 i Committed projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Intersections to be analyzed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 ' ICU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 ICU test . 11 ' MITIGATIONS . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 ON-SITE CIRCULATION AND PARKING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 ' SITE ACCESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 ' SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ' LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 -Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ' FIGURE 2 - Site Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 FIGURE 3 - Current Service Facility Vehicle Routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ' FIGURE 4 -Proposed Service Facility Vehicle Routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 ' FIGURE 5 -Project Trip Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 FIGURE 6-Project Traffic-Morning and Evening Peak Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 -Summary of Project Trip Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 TABLE 2 -List of Approved Projects and Occupancy Level as of May, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 TABLE 3 - Summary of Intersection Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 I INTRODUCTION ' Kimley-Horn and Associates has been retained to conduct a traffic impact analysis for the proposed National Car Rental Service Facility on Campus Drive, south of the John Wayne Airport. City policy requires that any project consisting of more than 10,000 square feet of gross floor area, ten or more ' dwelling units, or generating more than 130 daily trips must be evaluated in accordance with the requirements of the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance(TPO). As this report will indicate,the project will generate more than 130 daily trips. Therefore, the following analysis has been conducted in accordance ' with the TPO requirements. ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION National Car Rental System, Inc. proposes to relocate an existing National Car Rental Service Facility to a 1.3-acre site on the south side of Campus Drive, between Dove Street and MacArthur Boulevard. The existing Service Facility is located on the west side of Bristol Street South,between Birch Street and Cypress Street. t An area map is,provided on Figure 1, and depicts both the existing and the proposed Service Facility locations. A copy of the project site plan is provided on Figure 2. ' The project site is currently occupied by two single-story multi-tenant industrial office buildings,totalling approximately 15,000 square feet. These buildings would be demolished to allow for development of the proposed project. ' The proposed Service Facility is to house the facilities for cleaning, maintaining, and fueling the rental vehicles, after they have been returned by the customer. A small office building will be provided for tadministrative personnel. The site plan indicates parking storage for 164 rental vehicles (110 spaces for cars that are ready for ' rental, 42 for cars just returned, and 12 for cars being serviced), and 14 spaces for employees and visitors. National Car Rental has a leasing agent and a 90-space parking area at the John Wayne Airport. All customer pickup and drop-off activity will take place at the airport. The operation at the Service Facility will primarily involve shuttling the "ready cars" to the airport lot, and picking up the return cars from ' the airport lot and taking them back to the Service Facility to be cleaned and fueled. - The vehicles are transferred between the airport and the Service Facility by National Car Rental drivers. ' The cars are transferred in groups, with, for example, five ready cars driven from the Service Facility to the airport, and five returned cars driven back. The project site is proposed to have one right-in-right-out-only driveway on Campus Drive, located at approximately the center of the project. The existing use on the site is serviced by two right-in-right-out only driveways, located at both edges of the property. The existing raised median on Campus Drive will preclude any left-turn movements into or out of the site. Traffic approaching the site from the north on ' Campus Drive will be required to make a U-turn at Dove Street, and make a northbound right turn into the site. ' -1 1 1 / / 1 NOT TO SCALE / e 1 � 1 w� Qo 1 �o p� Q Ner, ay O sf m 1 /S u 1 �a o� �o 1 1 w2 5` 1 m n 1 F< a 1 FIGURE 1LEGEND s 1 LOCATION MAP • ANALYSIS INTERSECTIONS G 1 Kimley—Horn❑cn ss❑,tee, Inc. 2 RE oe IfilIfii 'Ifp 'Ifil �Ifil 9fi1 Ifil IfiF IfiF SERVICE -,) I� 2 ---� . . 'liil 11111 _ IMJ Ifil Ifil Ifll IQr+ �L�� fid Ifll 61:1 'Ifil I1 1111' ll 1111 .�I i�� ter i�i i�I ill ill f�l lal lid ice' I191 I!U ram, ��J ��i ��J ICJ ram+ ice: ice! i� 1i91 Ilil Ilfl. Ilil III III6 J li 1 Ii1P dill Ifil �IfiF Ifil Qiil Ifil 'Ifil liil �ifil r_1 i�i �_i rst i�i r_t i {�i t�1 FIGURE 2 44 SITE PLAN i 1 I ' A National Car Rental representative has indicated that the new (proposed) location will result in significant time and cost savings for the company, due to the reduction in time and distance required to ' travel back and forth between the airport and the service facility. The driver's route between the airport and the existing service facility is depicted on Figure 3, and the new route for the proposed site is depicted on Figure 4. As comparison of these two figures reveals, relocation of the Service Facility to the proposed location will result in a much shorter round-trip for the rental vehicles, as well as a reduction in traffic on some movements at a number of intersections. While the reduction in traffic at some intersections is acknowledged,this analysis will focus on the impact of the addition of project traffic ' to any impacted intersections, per the TPO requirements. ' TRIP GENERATION Trip generation estimates for the project are based on the number of parking spaces provided for rental cars on the site. The site plan indicates parking is provided for 164 rental cars. Trip generation rates for the project are based on a traffic study conducted by Austin Foust and Associates for a similar facility in the City of Newport Beach. Daily and peak hour trip generation rates, ' and the resulting project trip generation for 164 rental cars are summarized on Table 1. ' TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ' Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Description In Out In Out In Out ' Car Rental Trip Generation Rates (trips per car) 1.1 1.22 0.13 0.10 0.13 0.12 ' National Car Rental Trip Generation(164 cars) 180 200 21 16 21 20 ' The project will generate approximately 380 daily trips, with 21 inbound and 16 outbound trips in the morning peak hour, and 21 inbound and 20 outbound trips in the evening peak hour. ' The current uses on the site are still generating some traffic, not quantified by site counts. The TPO allows for deduction of existing traffic generation in the analysis of proposed project impact. For a worst-case analysis,the full traffic generation for the proposed Service Facility is assumed in the analysis, ' without any deduction taken for existing uses on site. TRIP DISTRIBUTION ' The assumed distribution of project traffic is depicted on Figure S. This distribution assumes that the majority of project-related traffic(80%) is comprised of the activity between the airport and the service ' facility, and will follow the routing depicted on Figure 4; and that the remainder (20%) is comprised of employees and service and sales traffic. 1 1 NOT TO SCALE / 01> 1 / � f 1 � 1 5 Oy o` e` 1 S B �SfO/Sf GOF r�� OLO Sf sf m f 4 0 o� F� �O 1 1 „v ch 5� 1 i3 rn 1 3 J F 1 FIGURE 3 x 1 CURRENT SERVICE FACILITY VEHICLE ROUTING 1 Kimley—Hor�n sates, Inc. 5 1 1 NOT TO SCALE 1 / / 1 � / �a 1 oQ O� Q� N eri QJy �o sfo `rf OoF r `e Sf r�sf0 Sf [D f 1 0 o� Fn �o 1 1 h� c°' 5 4+ 1 a h 1 F a 1 FIGURE 4 s 1 PROPOSED SERVICE FACILITY VEHICLE ROUTING 1 Klmley-Horn❑an sates, Inc. 6 1 1 / � NOT TO SCALE 0 / to%� 1 / S.- ,p I5 glp1. 0 0"? IoQO O 1 S �Jsfa/9t GoF 5w oDe 3t Jsfot Si m 1 Q`oJ/S fa 0 1 �a a� o� �o xe 1 i3 N 1 F a 1 FIGURE 5 s PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION 1 b 1 Kimley--Horn end Associates, Inc. 7 Based on these trip distribution assumptions, the peak hour project traffic at the area intersections is depicted on Fgure 6. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ' The methodology for the evaluation of the project's traffic-related impacts is defined in the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance (Ordinance 86-20) and explained in detail in the Administrative Procedures for Implementing The Traffic Phasing Ordinance. ' Compliance with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance requires that detailed impact analysis of the project traffic be conducted at any intersection to which the project will add one percent or more of the projected traffic volume during the AM or PM peak 2.5-hour period. Projected volumes include existing traffic ' volumes; regional growth, where appropriate; and projected traffic from:committed projects. The analysis year is one year after completion of the project, and is assumed to be two years from the date of this report. 1 Regional traffic growth is applied on selected City roadways which are assumed to carry a component of regional (non-local) traffic. The growth rates on these roadways have been determined by the City ' of Newport Beach, through regional modelling and historical evaluation procedures. A copy of the City of Newport Beach Regional Traffic Annual Growth Rate list is provided in Appendix A of this report. Based on this list,MacArthur Boulevard has a regional growth rate of 3 percent per year within the study area. No other roadway segments impacted by the project have a regional growth factor. Committed projects ' For purposes of this analysis, committed projects are those projects that have been approved, but are not fully occupied, and therefore are not yet impacting the area intersections with their fiill trip generating ' potential. The list of committed projects and their respective level of occupancy as of May, 1994, are shown on Table 2 and were provided by the City of Newport Beach. ' Traffic to be generated by these projects is added to existing traffic volumes,plus regional growth at area intersections, to arrive at projected traffic volumes for the analysis year. t Intersections to be analyzed Based on review of the project operation, and the likely origins and destinations of the project-related trips, the following intersections were identified for analysis: t • MacArthur Boulevard and Campus Drive • MacArthur Boulevard and Birch Street ' • MacArthur Boulevard and Jamboree Boulevard • Bristol Street North and Campus Drive • Bristol Street South and Irvine Boulevard t • Bristol Street North and Birch Street • Bristol Street South and Birch Street • Campus Drive and Dove Street -8- 1 NOT TO SCALE / 1 / / °r / e 2/2- 0 O Sf m O`O/f S M 1 r �a 1 ee o� P�0 S 1 5 1 a N 3 1 J F Q ' FIGURE 6 PROJECT TRAFFIC - MORNING AND EVENING PEAK HOUR 1 1 =Klmlll�—Ho5rPand Associates. Inc. 9 ' TABLE 2 LIST OF APPROVED PROJECTS AND ' OCCUPANCY LEVEL AS OF MAY, 1994 Project Name Occupancy Civic Plaza 96% Corporate Plaza 30% ' Newport Place 96% Valdez 40% Koll Center Newport No. 1 TPP 0% ' 1400 Dove Street 80% Koll Center TPP Amend.4A 0% 1 Rosso's Development 65% Fashion Island#2 0% ' Newporter Resort Expand 0% 28th St. Marina Project 50% ' Pacific Bell Site 0% Newport Village 0% ' Castaways Marina 0% Koll Center Carl's Jr. 52% ' Civic Plaza 0% Corporate Plaza&West 0% ' Harbor Pacific Plaza 0% Hoag Hospital Extension 0% ' Corporate Plaza West B 0% Interpretive Center 0% Pacific Mutual 1601 Avocado 0% ' Newport Diagnostic#85 0% Alamo Car Rental 0% ' Pao Tel Mini Storage 0% Four Seasons Addition 0% ' Family Fitness Center 0% Amendment No. 1 Ford Aero 0% ' Ciosa-Irvine Project 0% Newport Dunes 0% ' Bayview 0% City of Irvine Dev. 0% ' 10 ' The location of each of these intersections, in relation to the project site, is indicated on Figure 1 (presented previously). ' 1% test For the 1% Test, the project peak hour trip generation is doubled, to reflect the likely peak 2.5-hour project traffic generation. The projected 2.5-hour peak period approach volume for each intersection leg is comprised of the Existing peak 2.5-hour volume, provided by the City of Newport Beach; plus Regional Growth, where ' appropriate; plus Committed Project traffic. The project will add 1% of the peak 2.5 hour projected volume at only one intersection— Campus Drive at Dove Street. The morning peak hour project traffic volume represents 2.3% of the peak 2.5-hour volume on the southbound approach at this intersection. In accordance with the requirements of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance, an intersection capacity utilization analysis will be conducted at this ' intersection. The I% Analysis Worksheets for all analysis intersections are contained in Appendix B of this report. ' ICU Test ' The operation of the intersection of Campus Drive at Dove Street is presented on Table 3 for the following conditions: ' • Existing Conditions • Existing plus Regional Growth plus Committed Projects • Existing plus Regional Growth plus Committed Projects plus Project TABLE 3 ' SUMMARY OF WMRSECTION OPERATION Intersection: Campus Drive/Dove Street AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ' CONDITION ICU LOS ICU LOS Existing .63 B .65 B ' Existing + Growth + Committed Projects .64 B .68 B Existing + Growth + Committed Projects + Project .65 B .68 B ' The intersection currently operates at Level of Service "B" (LOS "B") in the morning peak hour, with an ICU of 0.63, and at LOS "B" in the evening peak hour, with an ICU of 0.65. With the addition of ' regional traffic growth, and traffic from committed projects, the intersection will continue to operate at LOS "B" in both peak hours, with ICU's of 0.64 and 0.68. The addition of project traffic to the intersection will not change the intersection level of service. The intersection will continue to operate ' at LOS "B" in both peak hours, with ICU's of 0.65 and 0.68. The ICU worksheet for this intersection is provided in Appendix C of this report. ' MITIGATIONS No traffic-related mitigation measures will be required of the proposed National Car Rental Service ' Facility. By application of the 1% Test, the project will impact one intersection (Campus Drive and Dove Street), and will not cause the intersection to operate at worse than Level of Service "D". ON-SITE CIRCULATION AND PARHING ' The parking provisions for the site consist of an area for 110 Ready Cars (counting 2 in the drive aisle), an area for 42 Return Cars (counting 6 in the drive aisles or in the car wash area), and a limited number ' of spaces at the back of the site designated for service, employees, and visitors. The parking areas for the Ready Cars and the Return Cars are designed such that the cars are parked bumper to bumper, side by side, and do not allow for circulation between the rows of cars. This area is not intended to be used ' by the general public. Movement of cars into and out of these parking areas will be accomplished by National Car Rental drivers, only. ' The vehicles depicted on the site plan measure 6 feet wide by 15 feet long. The 15-foot length would be typical of a compact car; the typical standard passenger vehicle is 18 to 20 feet long. Depending on the mix of rental vehicle types and sizes on the site, the operator may not be able to fit the number of ' vehicles shown on the site plan in the parking areas. The traffic study addresses the full 164 vehicles, and represents a worse-case analysis. ' Circulation through the site consists of a single main drive aisle down the middle of the site, and cross aisles at the front and the back of the site. There are a number of locations on the site where vehicle circulation appears to be "tight". When the Ready Car and the Return Car parking areas are full, ' circulation around the perimeter of the site will not be possible,and the cross aisles will dead end at three of the four corners of the site. The cross aisle at the front of the site will only be 20 feet wide, if the first row of the parking is occupied. This is mitigated by the fact that each aisle is intended to carry primarily one-way traffic (one way into the site for the Return Car side, and one way out of the site for the Ready Car side), and that only National Car Rental drivers are intended to drive in these areas. The double-loaded drive aisle at the back (southwest corner) of the site is also only 20 feet wide. This ' drive aisle will carry two-way traffic, may be used by drivers other than National Car Rental drivers, and may involve vehicles driven by or for the handicapped. This drive aisle is recommended for reconfiguration, to provide a minimum of 24 feet, per City of Newport Beach standards. ' tWhen cars leave the car wash, they will be parked in the area immediately outside the car wash to be dried. This drying area is located in the inbound lane of the main drive aisle. Vehicles destined for the back of the site will need to cross into the outbound lane to-get by any car in the drying area. While this is not an ideal design feature, it is assumed that, with the low volume of vehicles expected to access the back of the site, the potential for conflict at this location will be quite low. ' While many of these circulation features would not provide adequate internal circulation if the site served customer traffic or the general public, use of the site is expected to be limited to the employees of the ' site, and an occasional visitor. SITE ACCESS ' The existing use on the site is currently accessed by two right-in-right-out only driveways,located at both edges of the property. The National Car Rental facility site is proposed to have one right-in-right-out- only driveway on Campus Drive, located at approximately the center of the project. As shown on the site plan, the inbound lane is 24 feet wide, and would be equipped with "Tiger Teeth" to prohibit ' -12 ' outbound movements. The outbound lane is shown to be 10 feet wide, and controlled with an electronic gate. A 10-foot raised median divides the inbound and outbound lanes. ' City of Newport Beach Standard Plan 160L indicates that a commercial driveway should be a minimum of 24 feet wide (12 feet in each direction assumed), or 14 feet if one-way. The 14-foot minimum requirement allows for movement of emergency vehicles and other large vehicles that may have to service the site. It is recommended that the outbound lane be widened to a minimum of 14 feet, which could be accomplished by either moving the raised median over four feet (to the south), which would narrow the inbound lane, or by narrowing down to the median to six feet. The full 24-foot width on the inbound lane is not needed, since it is a right-turn-only approach, and will only require one inbound lane. SUMMARY ' • National Car Rental System, Inc. proposes to relocate an existing service facility to a site on Campus Drive, south of John Wayne Airport. ' • The facility will house 164 rental cars, and facilities for cleaning,maintaining, and fueling rental vehicles. ' • The facility will service the National Car Rental leasing operation at the John Wayne Airport. All customer pick-up and drop-off activity will take place at the airport. "Ready Cars" will be ' exchanged at the airport by National Car Rental drivers for returned cars, which will be brought back to the service facility to be cleaned and fueled. • The proposed operation will generate 380 trips per day, with 21 inbound and 16 outbound trips ' in the morning peak hour, and 21 inbound and 20 outbound trips in the evening peak hour. • The majority of project trips will travel only between the service facility and the airport lot. • The impact of the project was evaluated by applying the 1% Test, as required by the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance. The project would contribute 1% or more of the morning peak 2.5- ' hour period projected volume on the southbound leg of Campus Drive at Dove Street. The project does not impact any other intersection by 1%. ' • The addition of project traffic would not cause the intersection of Campus Drive and Dove Street to operate at an unsatisfactory level of service in either the morning or the evening peak hour. ' • The project will not be required to make improvements or modifications to the circulation system to mitigate project impact. 1 1 ' -13- 1 t 1 ' APPENDIX A ' CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANNUAL GROWTH RATES 1 ' CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ' REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANNUAL GROWTH RATE I COAST HIGHWAY ' East city limit to MacArthur Boulevard 2% MacArthur Boulevard to Jamboree Road 2% 1 Jamboree Road to Newport Boulevard 2% Newport Boulevard to west city limit 4% ' IRVINE AVENUE All 2.5% ' JAMBOREE ROAD Coast Highway to San Joaquin Hills Road 39. ' San Joaquin Hills Road to Bison 2% Bison to Bristol 15. ' Bristol to Campus 1% ' MACARTHUR BOULEVARD ' Coast Highway to San Joaquin Hills Road 6% San Joaquin Hills Road to north city limit 3% NEWPORT BOULEVARD ' Coast Highway to north city limit 100 Street segments not listed are assumed to have O% regional ' growth. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 i i APPENDIX B 1% ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 1 1 i V 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BOULEVARD/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 92 )AM ' Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected iX of Projected Protect Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour ' Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound (3y 4yn. I 1525 I92 31"I Ao34 AO O ' Southbound 2924 (�-4N�.1 31,7 G'�� 3935 39 Eastbound 2284 O 8z 23L10 .7`E ' Westbound 911 O 38 949 10 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected © Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ' (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 ' DATE: PROJECT: i 1 . 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection MACARTHUR BOULEVARD/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 9 92 )PM ' .Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 211 Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 2365 9R7 'jq8 340 35 i O South bound (3'°•gyr.- 3581 q49 373 �1�403 Eastbound 1699 O 1 It 171D 17 S Westbound 2817 O (03 ,1880 ' Q Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' Q Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume.' Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is -required. 1 NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY TUNE, 1994 DATE: ' PROJECT: 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MACARTHUR BLVD/BIRCH ST ' (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 _) AM ' Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Girection Peak 211 Hour. Growth Peak 21. Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour I I Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1569 14,5 IR73 1981 oZD i .Z !� (37—.a Southbound 1967 I$3 -20 570 a9 .� Eastbound 991 0 1121 1119 I I i 0 ' Westbound 629 O 50 fn7q y 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume a Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is .required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: ' PROJECT: 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection MACARTHUR BLVD/BIRCH ST (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 93)PM ' Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 Hour Growth Peak 22 Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 21 Hour ' Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume (31.-3yrs• 1 � Northbound 1737 1(0l '111 aC009 Southbound 10 3yra a?7 2121 q 3$5 a704 Eastbound 1182 O 191 13'13 14 i 0 Westbound 1746 o 55 1001 18 1 O i ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Q Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume: Intersection Capacity Utilization ' (I.C.U.) Analysis is� required. 1 • NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT: 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/MACARTHUR BLVD (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 9 _ AM Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 211 Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 2841 472 357(0 3(e 2 South bound (3Y.•3y�• ' ' 1166 l08 Io4Y, 132A a3 i 2 Eastbound 3257 qq 1187 145 b Westbound (116.3yrs•) O 2014 GI `15`E RB�q A8 ' a Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Q Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22. Hour Traffic Volume. - Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is ,required. 1 NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY NNE, 1994 DATE: I'i ' PROJECT: 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection JAMBOREE RD/MACARTHUR BLVD (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Inter pring 9 _ PM Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1X of Projected Protect Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' t3V.- rs: a G Northbound 183.1 170 612 o'llul3 ' southbound 2876 700 3$43 38 I I•. -31r6• i O Eastbound 2208 b7 Q$'T 37,107, 3R ' und �fo O Westbo 3631 IIO $9l� �637 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Mi Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 23-2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: ' PROJECT: _ 1% Traffic Volume Analysis NI5 Intersection BRISTOL STREETJ NORTH/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 92)AM ' Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 21g Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 5389 jp7 5�53 55 2� Southbound 1218 O ' Eastbound _D_ Westbound 2641 0 5 3�90 3a- Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume a Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ('I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. 1 NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: ' PROJECT: ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis 2/W Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/CAMPUS DRIVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 _)PM ' Peak 2y Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 211 Hour Growth Peak 211 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 3436 0 30 a44ptp 05 � Southbound 3569 O 1-20 Z�38 d Eastbound Q Q O O b Westbound' 6255 Do`7 191-7 ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: ' PROJECT: 1% Traffic V/gqlume Analysis 5 ' Intersection BRIATOL ST/CAMPUS DR/IRVINE AV (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 L-' ) ' Peak 231 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 22 Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 22 Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume VVo`lume �(VVoolgumme Volume Volume Northbound 3952 ' Southbound 991, Eastbound 6645 10 & 0 7J 10 -73 ' Westbound _ _ O ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2,- Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is. required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY TUNE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT: 1 1 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis �Ih 1 Intersection BRISTOL ST/CAMPUS DR-IRVINE AV (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 93)PM 1 Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project I Direction Peak 2 Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume i Volume ' I Northbound 3002 l7 p�/`oL 3`�+'740 1 r n02823 � at SOIL O nd 5600 O 590 nd —0— Q © p Q I 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic- Volume 1Q Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is .required. 1 1 1 1 i i NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: 1 PROJECT: 1% Traffic Volume alysis l�s Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/BIRCH STREET (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Inter pring 92 p,1K ' Peak 2$ Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction -Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume .� ' Northbound 2436 O 5 0�3 ( 0 Southbound 711 O .O Eastbound O O 0 Westbound ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 21-,.•Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. ' NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: ' PROJECF: ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis s/W ' Intersection BRISTOL STREET NORTH/BIRCH STREET (Existing Traffic Vol Uum—e-s--Fa-siT on Average Winter pring 19 _ PM ' Peak 2.11 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1192 0 Southbound 2937 �� I Eastbound _0_ O 0 ' Westbound 4532 0 S101 5� D Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT: 1% Traffic Volume Analysis/s ' Intersection BRISTOL ST/BIRCH ST (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Average Winter/Spring 19 93)Art Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 231 Hour Peak 2J, Hour Volume Volume Volume /Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 473 D 010 5 South Dun 578 0 at (p� j O ' Eastbound 4336 0 0 $ 04- ' S� ' Westbound - 0 Q O d p —0— t Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. ' NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY TUNE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT: ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis N�s Intersection BRISTOL ST/BIRCH ST (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter Spring 19 93)PM Peak 2J1 Hour Approved ' Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project I Direction Peak 2-, Hour Growth Peak 211 Hour Peak 2�i Hour Peak 2+ Hour Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound 634 40 O South bound 1336 5 1/39,� n Eastbound 3982 0 5D3 7 -10J✓ `TS i 0 � Westbound _0_ 0 0 b O 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ' (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY DATE• JUNE, 1994 PROJECT: FORM I ' 1VED MY 19 1994 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection CAMPUS/DOVE (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Inter pring 19 91 AM ' Peak 211 Hour Approved I Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of ProjectedFftak2� Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2�, Hour Peak 2k Hour our Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volu•e 1 i 35 o ji Northbound 3407 © (DS s � southbound 1691 O (� 1'55 lB 4 t I t Eastbound 29 j O o2 - � ' ' 3 Westbound 122 O 10 ) 59- °�' 1 ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. ' NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUKE, 1994 DATE: ' PROJECT: c n„ . ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection CAMPUS/DOVE (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Inter pring 9 91 PM Peak our Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1� of Projected Project Direction Peak 24 Hour Growth Peak 2�, Hour Peak 2�S Hour PeaYolumeour ' Peay.Iumeour Volume Volume Volume Volume I ' Northbound 1942 n 30 �q 72 oZU Southbound 3786 O lad 39OS �✓R 4� ' Eastbound 39 i Q pZ 41 1 ' ( Westbound 337 _ O Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. i 1 1 I ' NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY JUNE, 1994 DATE: PROJECT: [Horn T ' APPENDIX C INTERSECTION CAPACITY ' UTILIZATION WORKSHEET t • ' CA4220AM ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: CAMPUS & DOVE ' EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING ---- --------------1991 AM- I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI ' IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVOLume I V/C I ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume lw/o Projectl I Ratio I I I Volume I I I I I I I I I NL 1 1600 1 1 39 1 • 0.026 O---------------------------------------------- -I I HT 1 1 1415 0 1 a4 I I O 1 1 *`_-__-• • ____• I--------) 3200 -----------'---'--) 0.51 -- --- 0, 5 a•�---------C•59..i� I MR 1 1 208 ,I• O 1 10 1 I d l I --------------------------------------- -------'•-__---•-----I ' 1 SL 1 1600 1 1 121 1 0.081 - 0 1 '7 1 b.0$*1 'go 10.09.X1 --•----- -----------•----------------------------I 1_.sR--------.._I_..-----I-.--6DB I o i 25 1 l p l I 1 -- -- -- 3200 --) 0.19 * O:a.0 O•Ab ' 1 sR I 1 10 1 0 1 O 1 l C) l I 1 -------I I EL ) 1 1 4 ) 1 © 1 O 1 1 0 1 1 ' ---------------------------------•----- -------I 1 ET ) 1600 1 1 1 ) 0.01 * 0 1 0 1 O.O I* 1 0 1 0.01*1. ------------•---------------------------------I ' I ER ) 1 1 7 ) l o l l 1 1 p 1 1 ------------------I I WL ) 1 1 14 ) I o I a I I -°- I I I-------- ------- ------._ --- ---- I ' I WT ) 1600 I I 0 ) 0.03 * 0 1 a I 0.0341 0 1 0.03 1 ----------I I. WR ) 1 1 33 ) 1 O 1 3 1 1 1 I ' --- -------------------------------•---•--- ---• -- 1 EXISTING I �1 -'--------------------•-- ---•------------•--- I ' (EXIST'+ REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I o.(p4 1 _-_•-------------------------------I (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U-----------------------------I ld I -------------------------------- -----. -------- ' Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be Less than or equal to 0.90 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be — less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project 1 -----------------------------_---_ Description of system improvement: i ' CA4220PM ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: CAMPUS & DOVE ' EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING1991PH . - _ _ •_-_ •---__- --- -_ - _ I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI ' IHovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVolume I V/C I I ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 1w/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I volume I I I I-------------"---"------"-._.-------------------"-------""---- _-••--_____"_._-I 1600 55 I NT 1 -------------------�I- --Oj� o3 O o3 ------------IZ--i-— - I -I I 3200 "----"--- ) 0.23 ------ - MR 1 I 68 1 o I 3 I I o 1 -___--_•-------------------------------------I ' I SL 1 1600 1 1 93 1 0.06 1 C9 1 5 1 O.OLo I AO 10.0.7 1 --------------------------------------------------------------I I ST 1 1 1637 1 O 1 So I 1 0 1 1 l----- --) 3200 ---------i----_-- ) 0.51*---—--I---—---I--os3� I -----I o---- --. ----""•----•"-----"-"-----I I EL ) 1 1 7 ) 1 0 1 a I 1 0 1 I -----------------•---------------------------"I ..---... 3 ) 0.01 * I d 1 0. O I k I O I O.OII ET ) 1600 I I p ' 9 ) I I I I l o l I WL ) I 1 110 ) 1 6 I to I l o l 1 I-------- ------------------ "-'---' I ' I WT ) 1600 1 1 3 ) 0.10 *-_. O--1 0 1 0 ( 1 of 1 O 1 o. I 1 -------------------------------- I I 'WR ) 1 1 45 ) ' - '--"-'--"'---I L______•__'__________._'•_•__.___..'._(5.1z _ I 1EXISTING I !1zlr I I---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I C)AP j I I --------------------•_----__-.___-I 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. 10.(PE, I --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' I+ Projected + project traffic will be less then or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement Will be ' — less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project Description of system improvement: `- o t6-.:a TRAFFIC STUDIES cJ APPLICANT: CONSULTANTS: NAME: ' I i i PHONE: PROJECT NAME: DESCRIPTION: DATE DEPOSIT FEES PAYMENT REMAINING BALANCE SZ,moo aEdvrpRr CITY OF NEWPORT B* Building Department ' S 3300 Newport Blvd. e. P.O. Box 1768 c�4FoRN`� Newport Beach, CA 92659-1768 (714) 644-3288/3289 PLAN CHECK NO. . FEE RECEIPTS Received From lob Address Building Plan Check - Valuation $ 010-5002 $ Grading Plan Check - Cu. Yds. 010-5004 $ Overtime Plan Check - B G...... ....... .............010-5002/5004 $ Special Inspection............... .......................010-5008 $ Reinspection B E H P.................................010-5008 $ Temporary Electric................ ....... ...............010-4612 $ Temporary Gas...........................................010-4616 $ Grease Interceptor......................................010-4620 $ Planning Department Fees................................010-5000 $ Sale of Maps & Publications.............................010-5812 $ Determination of Unreasonable Hardship..................010-5018 $ Microfilm Copies/Photocopies............................010-5019 $ Hazardous Material Disclosure...........................010-5021 $ X Other /D--VV.3$ Sd, f 4 38.5'1 DO RECEIVED BY: TOTAL FEES $6 AF 2 81994 NOTICE: Plan Check expires 180 dag aREXANKIMACH I FEE RECEIPT NO. Mfeerept9.93> RC �250 • + AS 525 • + 02 ' e.",A775 ° * 5.975 • + o 00 rzctit;l';r� c% ❑S❑ Kimley-Horn PLANNING DEPARTMENT ® and Associates,Inc. 'TY OF NNIPORT g£A(lk' JUL 2'/ 199 and ilsassodafeddmsians: AN PM HufcheonEngineers 7181911001121112r3r IM Robeds Eagrneering Urban Resource Group TIN 56-0885615 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PI 7 07� INV . DATE : 06/30/94 INVOICE 0 : 093523 3300 NEWPORT BLVD. PROTECT N : 940801 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 CLIENT REF: NATIONAL RENT-A-GAR TRAFFIC STUDY PROS . MGR . : SAC PLEASE REPLY TO \ ! O 36 qa 2100 W. ORANGEWOOD AVENUE SUITE 140 _ ORANGE, CA 92668 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH 06/30/94 TOTAL FEE AUTHORIZED 5, 250 . 00 SPERCENT COMPLETE AS OF 06/30/94 100 . 0OY. FEE EARNED TO DATE 5,250 . 00 LESS PREVIOUS BILLINGS 3, 675 . 00 --------------- TOTAL THIS INVOICE 1 , 575 . 00 --------------- CURRENT BILLABLE AMOUNT 1 , 575 . 00 --------------- AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE 1 ,575 . 00 By iannh g �i-:,_r r - - RECGiVED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Kimley-Horn ::ITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. AM J W 21 199.1PM and its associated divisions: 718191101HI12111213141516 Hutcheon Engineers Q Urban Resource Group TIN 56-088561S CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH (STUD PIGLAN"" J NV . DATE : 05/31 /94 1J/ NVOICE # : 09328G 3300 NEWPORT BLVD . a� PROJECT # : 940801 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-896� CLIENT REF : NATIONAL RENT-A-CAR TRAFFIC MGR . : SAC PLEASE REPLY TO �t 2100 W . ORANGEWOOD AVENUE SUITE 140 ORANGE, CA 92468 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH 05/31 /94 TOTAL FEE AUTHORIZED 5, 250 . 00 PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF 05/31 /94 70 . 00% FEE EARNED TO DATE 3, 675. 00 LESS PREVIOUS BILLINGS . 00 --------------- TOTAL THIS INVOICE 3, 675 . 00 ---------------- CURRENT BILLABLE AMOUNT 3, 675 . 00 --------------- AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE 3, 675 . 00 Mij:.Pi KW FOR PA'`i°�3'�'E T IT By ( l • Qn' TUC).: 7 KIMLEY-HORN ORANGE TOL :16714-938-9488 Apr 27i4 15 :54 No .010 P .01 �It�'eir;Y 0 ,t.-t'r'A Kidgey-Horn and Associates,Inc. ' •' ' N10YY�1Y10,gA,•I•LA.AND i,MPONMFMALCONWITAIM Zilxl Weft OrenpeAroodAverw».9ulle 1aa,Oranpo,t:nldamio kassa 714D9D-1030 Fex 714938•DeBS April 27, 1994 " Post-it"brand tax transmittal memo 7671 walpeDee► S John H. Douglas, AICP ' !. 2-I rom� fAwH4c-y Planning Department r ` ;; Co. City of Ne"Qrt Beach Dept' 3300 Newpor(Boulevard l.xk 6h'�lr x► Newport Beach, CA 92658 Re: proposal to Prepare a Traffic Analysis for Proposed National Car Rental Service Facility on Campus Drive in the City Of dtlewport Dear Mr. Douglas: Thank you for inviting kimley=Morn!and Associates, Inc. to submit this proposal to prepare a traffic analysis for the proposed National;Car Rental Service Facility on Campus Drive in the City of Newport Beach. Kimsey-Horn .and Asol@tp has extensive experience in addressing local traffic impact circulation issues, and we look�foiwkd to this opportunity to woik with the City of Newport Beach. 41T�CATIoNs AND STAFFING rtiductlon ':.. ; Kimley-Horn is a national transportation engineering firin founded'in 1967 and ranked among Engineering NewsRecordis top 20 :transportation firms, We have a staff of approxnnnety 350 in 21 offices throughout the Southwest and SW4ieik,including the western metropolitan areas of Orange County, San Diego, Los Angeles, Las Vegas,'.J?h*lx, Dallas, and Denver. fig,atp Exoertens� ;• ; Established by transportation planners and traffic operations spe:lallsts, our firm offers a national reputation for services•to edties;:counties, and other public agencies as well as private-sector clients working with local agencies. Tti Southern California we have provided transportation services for both large- and small-scale studies. ;eve - articularly relevant efforts,include. tt . Rossmoor Bttii(pgss JrepaWes, County of Orange—Provided traffic impact analysis, parking circulation t'ecommendations,TDM program recommendations,and other project - specific analysis for 193-acre property located on the Corner of one of the busiest intersections in;t#e County: Moulton Parkway and El Toro Road. 1r Bolsa Cirica I.Apd 6e.Plan, City of IIuntington'DO WCounty of Orange—Worked closely.-with City alms County officials and community interest groups to evaluate over 20 alternative development and roadway plans on the controversial Bolsa Chica site, ■ Christ,College Master Plan, City of Irvine — Prepared traffic impact analysis for • update of the, hrl t College Irvine Master Plan, :'•Update included General Plan ghefloue • qe er . bn t.euderd•le . Fort MyRc . rate Vopte•'• or.n9e • odeAdo . • PkaM{x•at4tlp R se you•fluml. Tampa••Vern Dasen.ylronlA Steak•Met Palm Dean I ,i� '1'i lt,flt re l atia nehl'D} f �a�lyy'T1•aa • 19a7 I'a r .l' •1 '1 �•' - .A x..,.J: { �I�..a�WYPtY ft1 4 KIMLEY—HORN ORANGE TELO714-938-9488 Apr 27,J4 15 :55 No .010 P .02 Mr. John Doll" 2 Aprli'27, 1994 Amendment and,p.Fop4sed rezoning and development Of excess campus property for residential use..; AM/PM;; mint-mort,I City of LaIiabra • Prepared a detailed traffic analysis for conversion Of'at1 Ot.istijig retail corner into an AM/PM Minl-Mart Gas Station. Analysis included.a gap study, *.study of neighborhood cut-through traffic, and review of on-site and off-site 0ircttt4tiot constraints, � Yorba Ydttda Ii',aWllY>Ltttertaittrnent Center, City of Yorba Linda —Conducted traffic Impact analysis.atul Oxtensivo parking study for a proposal to open a family-oriented pizza and billiarde'facility in an existing shopping center. .4N>fftna J� We have selected the followingpersonnel from our Orange Countyoffice with the appropriate related experience in transportation servjces for planning efforts that may ae necessary for this project: • Serino CiandeV#i.. Ject Manager) - 8 yes`ts cxpet ca�' - Traffic raode7�itt8 . Tr ysis - Env fro o;imentation - Transportatiori.?De Management • --V 1 • Susan Rosner (Analy;ls'and Support) - 4 years experlSgnoe; - Tr ortatigttlatning Traffic htiptiostia�ysis .. pu�atlt Upp„na/M,pltfy [`-n11tfM1, . Kimloy-Horn has,a detailed QA7QC program that is ingrained into our day-to-day practice. We operate with a philosophy that our olients deserve the very best service we can provide. Our QA/QC efforts are t�' ' guided by a•specific ICimley-Horn A/QC manual which is issued to each Kiniley-Horn professional, utilized in each projeet.undert*n, fad regularly revised/updated. For this project, the key component of our QA/QC effort will be an in-house review by a senior professional,not involved in conducting the project. For this project, Kimley-Horn is assigning Herman Basmaciyan, P.S. to provide ins.louse QA/QC. Mr. liasmaciyan is a senior transportation engineer with in all aspects of transportation planning. over 20 years of local experience ir. A. Awl .'+1'.1.'.1 1!. ., i.. •'!� .1 q.'R��'i... I rXlfw;MM y • � t a'' i ...—..—.ter-....-..-...—,r.,-.•.wm—..w l.nr-.u....o,n' .N ln.n KIMLEY-HORN ORANGE TEL : 11--714-938-9488 Apr 27�4 15 :55 No .010 P .03 3 April 27, 1994 Mr. John Douglas BACKGROUND & AP,PROA r e evelop the site as a Service Facility,serving primarily the National Car Rental System,Inc-proppses to d Orange County AiMort..i: ? t •• .:qS 1 The project site Is off-site from.tiie Airport, and is proposed to serve as the cleaning and maintenance center for the-National vehicles:-'!Car rental customers will typically not come to the site; the cars will be delivered to and pickcd up froth the airport by National personnel. The traffic impact study.will 04 to.•address the amount of traffic to be generated by the proposed on the street system. Since the proposed facility will not function operation; and its impact in the same manner as a.typioal cat r facility,trip generation estimator will need to be based, in part, on practical iWrlence and jutlgttient, The traffic analysis will be conducted in accordance with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) Guidelines. For purposes of this.,proposal; it is assumed the following seven intersections will require analysis: MacArthur Boulevard 6 taiiipus Drive • MacArthur Boulevard. trot • MacArthur BoulevardIs ore* Road • Campus Driva jD Bristgl5t North • Can Drive . Bri6tol'S South • Birch Street @.P Istoi 5traet�North Birch Street*�ristol lSt[oo Isouth SCOPE OF SERVICES The fallowltlg tasks ar4 envisl0;ri�d for this project: 1. Conduct a site Visit ofl.the proposed site. a i 2. Meet with Cl tystaff to d�cass the relevant issues surrounding the proposal, and to obtain traffic , counts and any other materials or documentation available. Reach concurrence on final list of analysis locatigPs, Snit-tprjach to analysis. 3. Review traffic`Counts and cQuate for reasonableness and accuracy, 4. Observe traffic.flow acid traffic patterns on the affected streets. 5, Bsti;matc the amount oftraftAc to be generated by the proposed prq{ect, and distribution of the project traffic on the AM street system. ;A.. { 6. Determine if project tµgpts !% criteria at any intersection, and if further analysis is necessary. A! ,I •K• A Vq .•:oi. :a•:, •. .• tA�•. . ..i• ^Y .1 ' 'i- . .f !j!s. 40iYw,t, v •sy , KIMLEY—HORN ORRNGE TEL 714-938-9488 Rpr 27•'94 15 :56 No .010 P .04 v 4 April 27, 1994 Mr. John Douglas 7. Identify the projgot ImpA •fto tcsult from the proposed project. 1� 1 8, If necessary, identify the!{litigation measures necessary tb address the impacts. 9. Present the fmdiilgs of do;anlilysis in a report, The scope of•services does not i'J CIude attendance at any public meetings. If attendance at meetings is required, they will be blilcd on,a titlle-and-materials basis, in accordance with the Khnley-Horn and Associates hourly Billirw Rate Schedule in effect at the time. sCHEAIJLE We are prepared to bcgln workiitlt pl le our on analysis rwith wipt Of ithin two-ttoothree-we to ek tlmetTFollowing receipt A draft of all necessary. data, we will Fo{nplpte report will be submitted to you.for ypur review and comtnent. 1 TEE This estimate assumes that the City of Newport Beach will provide all necessary traffic data and further data collection by Kimley-Horh.'wit l not be required for analysis of the previously identified seven locations. A breakdown of IN cost,estimate is provided for your information, Estimated Projeet Start-Tip • $600 00 Existing Conditions Ab AYS10 550.00 Project Trip Generat1q. ls�rlbutlon Estimates 850.00 9b Analysis . 550.00 1 l,200.00' Project Impact and Mitigation Report Preparation• —LIMA $5,250.00 KHA proposes to con)plete the�tasks outlined above for a lump sum fee of$ 5,250,00. The proposed fee includes labor fees, plus an amount to cover certain direct expenses for the project which would included in-house duplicating, facsimile, local mileage, telephone, postage, in-house blueprinting, and word procesi.W 4gmputer. As necessary, additional services will be,provided for an additional fee based on curre4 hourly rates plus direct expenses at a 1.10 multiplier, Billings will be issued on the basis of,percent pmOWO, and will be due and payable within 30 days of invoicing. •f:i• 1':,aY• . 1 .j :} 1411 ..ate , •. .+ yob„�+x.�w..:�!ec'.MIn,C}!4L'Ywd�l2t11Sl;f:d11 KIMLEY—HORN ORRNuE H1 714-938-9488 Rpr 27'94 15 :57 No .010 P .05 i 5 April 27, 1994 Mr. John Douglas CLOSURE In addition to the matters,set forth,herefn, our agreement shall include and shall be subject to the attached Standard provisions. Tho term"'the client" as used in the attached-Standard Provisions shall refer to The City of Newpprt Beach.' °"' ' If you concur in the foregoing Add wish to direct us to proceed with the Scope outlined, please execute the enclosed copy of this letter agreement in the space provided, and roturn to our offices. Fees and times stated in this agreement are valid for thirty (30) days after the date of this letter. We appreciate this opportunity toyorktwith the City of Newport Beach, and look forward to a successful project, Please call if you hava:�tty sincerely, KIMLEY•HORN AND ASSOCIATES, Inc. Serino Ciandella Project Manager SAC.Pm i Natkar pro10404pro cc: Rich Edmonton, Traffic AQ$.ln0P ng — Attachment: standard Provisipiui I 1994 Agreed to this day ol',., City'ofNow rtBeach `s ssoCWrc 4A'K)lj printed Namo',and Titlb:i V Iq YS. ... .. . :.f T. .t •v.i .. ' e ��i , ><. . .:,.. ... Hai nsrny' _. _ Mt+,.:_4��j,S�dllilkt�iii•t�l•I�I IEi•Itiuill� PURE E ORDER / PAGE 1 o�a�WPoRm CITY OF NE�PORT BEACH PURCHASE ORDER 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD u P.O. BOX1768 w•tl,.,,a„rt. 11., 1; . '°" NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92659-8915 =i 1FOa�`� PHONE: (714) 644-3118 pURCH.ORDER DATE I PATE REQUIRED REQUISITION NO. VENDOR N0. DESCRIPTION (15/02/94 0974 1TTT; : SI:RINE CI.ANDELLA VENDOR I:IMLEY-ITOIIN and ,ASSOCIATES. INC. rHQIPCITY OF uEwPORT BEACH 2100 W. ORANGEIVOOD AVENUEPLANNIING DEPARTMENT SUITE 140 3300 NiEQPOPT RLVD. ORANGE, CA 92698 NMa IPORT BEACH. CALIF, 9266:1 CONFIRM. 113LANKET I FINAL PAYMENTTERMS FREIGHT NI NI NET 30 DAYS 1 1I/11 QUANTITY UNIT OF MEASURE COMMODITY CODE UNIT PRICE EXTENSION PROVIDE. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SERVICE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED ON CAMPUS DRIVE ITI NrIVPORT BEACH, PER YOUR PROPOSAL DATED 4/27/94. (T9897) CONTACT: JOHN OxITt*t,AS - -PLANNING DfPART1,1ENT (-714) �44-3725 1 .00 STUDS' 4:1 Q r,.kl; tiut , Ytt0056.110 ITEM NO,001 TRAFFIC STttIT}Y 8.1, DV;1:fIITBVTf kPOVE 14,` I TOTAL PURCHASE ORDER 5. 250.00 ORGANIZATION ACCOUNT PROJECT r PROJECT ACCOUNT AMOUNT 010 2300 5125000 TOTAL PURCHASE ORDER 5,250:00 AC'SCE Muplanmulthisordorbys"IleCvendornlI baby uctnpladgnmvntorbydalivewinwholnnrin pan olfho du"' called lorhernundm / 1y�7�`J�/ /1" 1 �•,r n:dcwphn�Ihluardeglh+:nllarrventlor nctnowindn•'Slhgt hn hw n�ad and,gmes to All brats and cond,hOnS including thastpnnmdonihnnenann J"Jy 1-I'l.i '! i - • ♦dnnlrhaCodretTur,.hvoOlder Thaool y mrmx and eonddlamthat wdl at ppp11m411 to thnavr,r,14.ra oft his Contr11t.1 tho'u>sued by fin City olNwpgn BndcM1 BY IMPORTANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON THE REVERSE SIDE ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN. The Adlcica covcred by this Purcha^o Ordcr or Contract must conform to applicable CA-OSHA Standards,andror other appropriate laws,regulations,rulec,and code of Federal Govemmcnl and the StAo of California Show .9q A copemtc Itom any MIDI solos lax,use tax or Federal lux applicable to this parahISO This order subject to California sales tax All OUT-OF-STATE VENDORS:the CITY will pay any snlesavao tax on all purchases l shipped from out-ofotalo.All purchoses and transpodall n charges are exempt from Federal exeNo lax NOTE:All purchases are F O B doctinabon uniuss athomil aathonzod Charges for ah pmorAS are to be height prrpnld and added to ihoml(shown as a-,pando arm)whore so outheezcd Da not include Federal tramportauon ta<A Newport Beach business license may be required to conduct business in the City. ORIGINATOR'S/DEPARTMENTAL COPY I PURCHASE ;ter CITY OF awwaogr REQUISITION NEWPORT BEACH �! Gueoa``r P.O.No.: Date: April 29. 1994 (if Reserved) Dept: S, ggested Vendor: Ship To: IC MLEY-HORN and Associates; Inc, A'00 W. OranOwood.Ave-, , Suite 140_.- _ Orange CA 92668 - Attention: Phone No: Quantity Description of Articles or Services Required Unit Price Amount Budget#� 1 Tyaffic Study a for 5250.00 5250A0 010-2300 National Car Rental Service, Cam us Dr. TS 97 . r , Comments: Sub Total Tax Total Date Required: F.O.B. Terms Code Amount PRO (Department Head or person aWhorlztd to execute requisitions PURCHASING MANAGER FINANCE DIRECTOR(Approval required for purchases exoceding$4000) U z W a a J 200.00, �S _ - ---- ° -- ° --O - _ Z _ � Q F_ 1EMPTEES, - 10 I 'VISITORS 4 S VIC - 5 (1) • cc REFUSE _ V o z U O F z ° u q J I c SERVICE - 7 F > uj 10:)'-O" 20'-0" L 42'-0" L 38'-O" U V a p I'� I W a �! SERVICE I EQ. HZZ o PARKING GAL:GIJLATIONS op s 06 ( 0A O ffm EMPLOYEE PARKING 10 SPACES E GAR WASH U. (n VISITOR PARKING 4 SPACES + i r T ;c' O W ym SERVICE CARS 12 SPACES I ,� j` ( u w N CARS 42 SPACES i, T I �1 0 U In H z RETUR ( �, I I -� ° � N q a READY CARS 110 SPACES _ i ' I ADMIN I r ^ rx u V d W TOTAL CAPACITY 100 SPACES - J ° o z UU I II L — — I � I Lu � p 0. � a zz �1/G FUEL TAN U I ' z �D�.ISI� eXISTG �1� ( ° Q O w IN EN11RE`CY (TYP CA ( f I Q Q m ARE DIA&RAMkTIG O►�1L`� Y C S I E� N C 5 0 0 110 AGE 42 AG V � d w I U T(PaL SI DE AND REAR PPOPERTM UPE F:aw-A v. (ol•dI TALL-GRAIN UNr, I WITH VINYL. SLATS 1 z Q SH 6- ED M NAI.DE FfXpNReS I - - - > ❑ TO �•Ol`TA 6 GA 5. W Oo FFOPEP-lyUNE, FINAL DESIGN - J ELEG. GAME MA> T4M - ro cannR,E wl� wd s Q TEETH �•, (�I,p��OF� � �6 G(1�GllVf•5.. 0. . . -DECCRATiVE NDSG>�PED AREA Q • LANDSCAPED AREA " 11 MASONRY WALL ' I, REWlZKsIPEMAtAj AV,►.FAVIWoo RoW, I , I I)T1U11E5,ETC AG FIFa0. PRa><iDE - -0 10-0 24-0 _—__-�b-o — E-- WW GF-N11�AL GUf�6 CVT�pRNE- _ AISLE- 200.00 I 1 NI=W NVDfA IIM,�1T SIGN 1 1CL { 1 ISSUE DATES 6 REVISIONS PRELIM. 3/9/94 PRELIM. 3/24/94 PRELIM 3/28/94 `W PROPU�Et7 51N6 FLEX 566E /+ cOffia IT CAMPUS DRIVE - 601 R/W S koN ATOP 21-o 'TALI. RASE CMAIA) z (SELF 1LL.0.AVrrr.A,IM' LAY) W gin U z NC94107SD1 W DRAWN 9r _ a a CALLED SITE PLAN O CHECKED NORTH SCALE 1":20' J .► '' • m ti Y _�„-,'� � SITE` PLAN .� r _ DATr63L Z0 .. roe No 94107 HMO ==19 Ai sm. O r I� w 2 4'-O" 42'-0" 34'-0" a . a _ o 4'-O" 0'-O" 12'-O" - J -- Y _ - 4 = Q rq LIGHT FIXTURE ' — - SEE ELECT'L DWG5. -- r?� o 0 ---- "----- --_-- - - - — WALL LOWER cc -_�._--- ---- + SEE MECHANICAL DWG5. ---Y ( --1o'X1o' F15 ERG LA55 OHD ' _ 4 • _ I 1H. FL. EL. 100'-0" �; o. SERVICE o O p n I (�l z fIREFIN. IN5IJL. METAL _ _ x — - - Q Q J 41- SECTIONAL DOOR Q Q 4 PARTS / �� ,II1i, il_,, W (, EQUIPM. Q W SOUTH ELEVATION, I � r - V / \ - /� �'W ''�, _SCALE 1/0 .1-O (am Q _O 1'-O' 0 13'-4° oiI 16'-0" b' If _0�� o '-O" f- Lu ;1 ' U c 0"X16" SCORED STANDARD Q WASH BA7 � — (--- FACE C.M.U. c.U. Q ----_- - — -- _ b"XI b" SPLIT FACED 4 _ A -- 4 WATER-REPELLENT C.M.U. v 4 4 --- — 0"X1b" SCORED GROUND FACED 'OATS = v Ua� ° CONN AS G�COLOCRM� OF v ELEG. GENERAL r �I�IOMEN C _ 0"X16" SPLIT FACED OFFICE � l W _ -- — WATER-REPELLENT CMJJ. - I Lo w U 0"X16" SCORED STANDARD / I I Z _ FACE C.M.U. r T. COPY -- 4 z Y Q /MEN - W rL Ion I —i- — -, -- ►- -1 -,- -r-- 1— — J \ , 4 - (j Q i~7 _ BREAK RM. I CANOPY LINE ABOVE z O❑ NORTH ELEVATION 4 � � MANAGER q = � �' � w o XC ALE 1/0":1'-0" G � a LL IO[ID r_1 < 4 4 Y. 1J LIGHT FIXTURE_ SEE ELEC'IL Z Q CIO PLANS _ fiullL O �� 1_ 1_ II 1_ 1_ 1i 1_ II 1_ 11 1_ II 1_ 11 1_ 10. _ 11 1_ 11 �_ V/ h a- PREFIN. METAL GRAVEL STOP 0 4 0 0 3 4 3 0 4 0 3 0 3 4 0 411 O" 4 0 0 Q _ w I L Z 4'-0 11 I 42'-011 1 4'-O" 15'-0" 11-911 1'-9" 12'-0 11 .0 IF III 0"X16" SCORED GROUND FACED = d WATER-REPELLENT CMJ.J. OF Q O CONTRASTING COLOR n (� ---- 0"X1b" SPLIT FACED I -- — WATER-REPELLENT C.M.U. CLEAR ANODIZEDALLMINLM L - - - - - - - - - - - - _J Q WINDOWS WITH INSLL. GRAY z SOLAR GLAZING (MEDIUM) Q d W — _ — — — — — — --- — — — -� — STONE SILL. TYPL J ❑ ALLMINLM ENTRANCE U r� CALLED FLOOR PLAN NEST ELEVATION NOTE: 4 NORTH SCALE 1/0":1'-O" I I Un ALL EXTERIOR C.M.U. TO BE 'L 20.000 GALLON ~ Q SCALE 1/0".1'-O" FACTORY TREATED WITH WATER-REPELLANT. U/G FUEL STORAGE TANK U w 2 QISSUE DATES&REVISIONS od PRELIM. 3/9/94 PRELIM. 3124/94 LIGHT Fl XTLRE51, SEE ELECL PLANS 7'-O" 10'-O" 7'-O" 14'-O" PRELIM. 3/28/94 14'-O" W PREFIN. METAL GRAVEL STOP PREFIN15HED METAL PREFIN15HED METAL w GRAVEL STOP GRAVEL STOP z 0"X16" SCORED STANDARD LIGHT 12IXTLRF-5 LIGHT FIXTLRES z _— - FACED CM.U• SEE ELECL PLANS SEE ELECL PLANS "v w _—`-- 0"X16" SCORED GROUND PACED WATER-REPELLANT CMJJ. OF PREFINISHED METAL PREFINISHED METAL CONTRASTING COLOR FASCIA PANEL FASCIA PANEL U z STEEL COLLMNS 4 STEEL COLLMNS Q db. NC94107A1 _ 0"X1 b" SPLIT FACED FIELD PAINT 2 COATS FIELD PAINT 2 COATS cc WATER-REPELLENT CM1J. W DRAWN BY FL. EL. 100'-O" a CHECKED CONCRETE FUEL ISLAND CONCRETE FUEL 15LAND Y ADM IN/SERVICE AN 0 °d FUEL ISLAND PLAN Q AND ELEVATIONS FAST ELEVATION + SOUTH ELEVATION CANOPY WEST ELEVATION CANOPY SCALE 1/0":1'-O" SCALE 1/0":1'-O" SCALE 1/5":1'-0" �.- 94107 ti � JOB NO m z � o U SH. OF t