Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTS105 FINAL FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR USE PERMIT NO. 3557 AND TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 105 FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed application is a secondary use in nature which may be considered as a support service allowed by the General Plan Land Use Element and the proposed project, under the circumstances of the particular use, would not be detrimental to the general welfare of the City 2. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed development. 3. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 20.80.060 of the Municipal Code. 4. That the proposed project will tend to decrease the property and sales taxes which accrue to the City. CONDITIONS: 1. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 2. That the on-site parking,vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the Traffic Engineer. 3. That the intersection of the private drives and streets be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 35 miles per hour in accordance with the City's Sight Distance Standard 110-L. The sight distance requirement may be modified at non-critical locations, subject to approval of the Traffic Engineer. 4. That the design the control gate at the entrance on Dove Street be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and Fire Department. That the driveways be designed to handle fuel delivery vehicles. 5. That all unused drive approaches be removed and replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalk and that all work be completed under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 6. That the design of the on-site drainage be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. • • 7. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. 8. Prior to the issuance of a business license or building permit, a detailed landscaping and irrigation plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect or landscape contractor shall be submitted to be reviewed by the Planning and Building Departments. The plan shall include appropriate plant materials of sufficient size to partially obscure the retaining wall and other fencing from view. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, landscaping and irrigation shall be installed according to the approved plan. 9. Removal or delivery of the rental vehicles (using large trucks) shall be prohibited on the public streets surrounding the subject site. 10. The applicant shall work with the Revenue Division of the City and provide best efforts to establish Newport Beach as a point of sale for the purpose of accruing sales tax associated with car rentals. 0 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES m N � _J ROLL Q ~ a: w August 14, 1995 Cr W 3g2UC90 CALL INDEX "An application to add outdoor dining may be denied or approval of an application may be revoked or modified by the Planning Director, subject to call up by the Planning Commission or ' ty Council for referral to the Planning Cc mission within fourteen (14) days upon a findin of the failure to comply with the ccnditi s in this Section and all other applicab conditions and regulations." Council Mem r Glover indicated she was opposed to incl ing the above amendment in her motion. In response to Council ' quiry, the City Attorney stated that in his opinion, a Planning Commission has the final authority with spect to the subject Ordinance. The City Coun ' can call up an application, but only to refer i to the Planning Commission, and that there ould be no continuing review beyond that. Ayes x x x The amendment made by Council ember Noes x x x x Edwards was voted on and FAILED. Ayes x x x x x x The motion made by Council Member Glover s Noes x voted on and carried. 45. Mayor Hedges opened the public hearing on the U/P 3557/ application of ROBERT H. LEE ASSOCIATES for USE Trfc Stdy 105 PERMIT NO. 3557 AND TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 105 on 4201 Birch St property located at 4201 Birch Street - Request to (88) ' permit the establishment of an automobile storage facility for Avis automobile rental fleet on property located in the M-1-A District. The proposal includes washing, vacuuming and fueling services of the automobiles; and the approval of a traffic study for the proposed development. Also included in the application is a modification to the Zoning Code to allow a 6 foot high concrete block wall to encroach 5 feet into the required 15 foot street side setback along Dove Street; AND USE PERMIT NO. 3558, on property located at 848 & U/P 3558 888 Dove Street - Request to permit the 848/888 Dove establishment of administrative and clerical offices St (88) and automobile maintenance facilities for Avis automobile rental fleet on property located in the Newport Place Planned Community. Report from Planning Department. Volume 49 - Page 355 T O � A - I CI F NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES 'n ROLL ¢ a: L9 > W CALL August14, 1995 ; ¢ wwxo0Z w3g2Ut70 INDEX Mr. Delino referenced the Site Map depicting the /p 3557/3558 location of the two proposed uses, and stated the Planning Commission reviewed these two applications in tandem. He noted that an emergency ordinance has also been prepared for Council consideration which would adopt a moratorium on the establishment of certain auto service facilities within certain zoning and planned community districts. The two applications in question were approved by the Planning Commission, but called up by the City Council. The Birch Street project includes the demolition of on existing office building (approximately 23,500 square feet) to establish a quick turnaround facility for a 265 car rental fleet which will be shuttled to and from John Wayne Airport. The Dove Street project is a reuse of an unoccupied site of a former new car dealership for a major vehicle maintenance facility. These two projects together will support Avis Rental Car counter and services located at John Wayne Airport. Currently, Avis provides these services from a location in Santa Ana along the 55 Freeway. Relocation of these facilities nearer to the airport will substantially reduce operating costs for Avis. He discussed the arguments supporting approval as well as the arguments for denial as enumerated in the staff report. Mr. Delino stated that if the above applications are approved, he would recommend that the Council approve the following additional Finding and Condition as set forth in Exhibit A: Finding - "That the proposed project(s) will tend to decrease the property and sales taxes which accrue to the City." Condition - "The applicant shall work with the Revenue Division of the City and provide best efforts to establish Newport Beach as,a point of sale for the purpose of accruing sales tax associated with car rentals." Mayor Pro Tern Debay reported that she had viewed the projects in question, and that the applicant has dutifully pursued the entitlements for the intended uses. In response to her question regarding the need for landscaping 4n front of the two sites, Mr. Delino advised that conditions have been imposed so that both developments satisfy this concern. Volume 49 - Page 356 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES r w w H August 14, 1995 � ROLL " > w A � wwo � z INDEX CALL wXmmuu0 Motion x Council Member Glover stated the reason she /P 3557/3558 called these two projects up for public hearing was to review the area inasmuch as a number of properties have changed hands over the years. She stated she has visited the area and has had discussions with representatives of Avis as well as the Finance Department, and as a result, feels these two projects are not only good uses, but could generate some income for the City. Therefore, she moved to sustain the decision of the Planning Commission and approve Use Permit No. 3557, Traffic Study No. 105 and Use Permit No. 3558, including the added Condition and Finding described in Exhibit A of the staff report. Gary Semiing, Architect with Robert H. Lee & Associates, representing the applicant, addressed the Council and stated they have been working with the Planning and Traffic Engineering Departments on their projects, and feel they have taken into consideration all concerns, including the issue expressed by Mayor Pro Tern Debay regarding landscaping in front of their developments. There will also not be any signage on the Birch Street site and very minimal signage at the Dove Street location. They feel their projects will be beneficial to the City as well as John Wayne Airport and urged approval. Dolores Offing, 17 Hillsborough Drive, addressed the Council and indicated the City should try and work with the County Board of Supervisors to discuss a fee being paid to the City of Newport Beach for car rentals since the City of Brea has negotiated a fee on the imported trash that will be put into the Brea landfill. She noted that the City of Newport Beach does not receive any revenue from car rental transactions conducted at John Wayne Airport. Barry West, owner of property adjacent to Avis on Birch Street, addressed the Council and stated that he had only one concern with the proposed development, and that is the 12,000 gallon underground gasoline storage tank which is about 50 feet from his building. Also, behind his property Is National Car Rental and they, too, have a 12,000 gallon underground gasoline storage tank. He stated his concern is that there is the potential of an "accident waiting to happen." He also has an egress easement over the Avis property which he purchased at the same time he bought his property from The Irvine Company. Volume 49 - Page 357 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES 'n ROLL August ta, 1995 Q � dW > W CALL QaWWo9Z w3g2U (90 INDEX The Public Works Director advised that he talked U/P 3557/3558 with Mr. West during the Council recess, and that the City's subdivision engineer as well as the Fire Marshal will meet with Mr. West regarding his concerns, and make modifications as necessary. There being no others wishing to address the Council, the public hearing was closed. All Ayes The motion made earlier by Council Member Glover was voted on and carried. There being no objections, the staff was directed to undertake a "quick fix' on the Zoning Ordinance clarifying the language as to uses that are ancillary to or supportive of the primary uses, for this area, and return to the City Council in approximately 60 days. Motion x In the interim, Mayor Hedges moved to adopt an Emergency Ordinance ADOPTING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OR EXPANSION OF CERTAIN AUTO SERVICE FACILITIES WITHIN CERTAIN ZONING AND PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICTS (Report from the Assistant City Manager). Council Member Cox spoke in opposition to the moratorium, indicating the Council does not know what the impact will be once this action has been taken, nor does it know how many applications of this nature are in the process, and until the City has a better handle on this issue, he does not think enacting the proposed moratorium is the answer. Council Member O'Neil pointed out that if the Emergency Ordinance is adopted, it is only in effect for 45 days, and therefore, he does not see the need for it until further information is brought back to the Council. Ayes x x The motion made by Mayor Hedges was voted on Noes x x x x x and FAILED. Motion x �recommendation of the City Attorney, es 95-95 motion was rna b Council Member Glover to adopt Resolution No. - eclaring Intention to initiate amendments to the Nevipor Planned Community Text. Volume 49- Page 358 MINUTES COMMISSIONERS 9100 `tis CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 221995 ROLL INDEX CALL Motion * Motion was made and voted endment No. 826 for public Ayes * * * * * hearing at the g Commission meeting of July 20, 1995. Absent * HARRIED. Use Permit No 3558 (EublicHearinel Agenda Item No. 1 Request to permit the establishment of administrative and clerical UP No.3558 offices and automobile maintenance facilities for Avis's rental fleet on property located in the Newport Place Planned Community. Approved LOCATION: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 64-25 (Resubdivision No. 462) located at 848-888 Dove Street, on the southeasterly side of Dove Street between Bristol Street North and Quail 'Street, in the Newport Place Planned Community. ZONE: P-C APPLICANT: Robert H.Lee Associates,Petaluma OWNER: Nikko Capital,Newport Beach AND A Use Permit No 3 5 57(Public Hearing) Agenda Iter No. 2 Request to permit the establishment of an automobile storage facility for Avis's automobile rental fleet on property located in the M-1-A up No. 355. District. The proposal includes washing, vacuuming and fueling and services of the automobiles. Also included in the application is a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow a 6 foot high masonry wall to encroach 5 feet into the required 15 foot street side setback along Dove Street. -8- COMMISSIONERS • • MINUTES 9\Opp ��9�� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL INDEX CALL AND B. Traffic Study No 105 (public Hearing) TS No. 105 Request to permit a traffic study so as to allow an automobile storage Approved facility. LOCATION: Lot 24, Tract No. 3201 and Parcel 1, Parcel Map 94-142, located at 4201 Birch Street, on the northerly comer of Birch Street and Dove Street, across Birch Street from the Newport Place Planned Community. ZONE: M-1-A APPLICANT: Robert H.Lee Associates,Petaluma OWNER: Donald R.Lawrenz,Newport Beach James Hewicker, Planning Director, suggested that inasmuch as'Item Nos. 1 and 2 have the same applicant and the applications are similar that the public hearing be held simultaneously. He stated that a letter was received by the Planning Department from Mr. Frank Lawrence representing Mr. Frank Malik dated June 22, 1995, objecting to Use Permit No. 3557 and Traffic Study No. 105. Mr. Malik received approval on November 10, 1994, for a parcel at 3543 Campus Drive that encompasses the Campus Drive frontage of Item No. 2, for an automobile repair facility. Acting Chairman Ridgeway pointed out that the objection stated in the letter is a civil matter and it is beyond the authority of the Planning Commission. In response to a question posed by Acting Chairman Ridgeway, Mr. Hewicker replied that the property owner, Donald R. Lawrenz, initialed the use permit application to grant the applicant authority to apply for the permits. Notion * Motion was made and voted on that Item Nos. 1 and 2 will be heard in Ayes * * * tandem. MOTION CARRIED. Absent -9- COMMISSIONERS MINUTES °°F�°�F�ti o9oj CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL INDEX CALL Don Webb, Public Works Director, referred to Supplement Agenda Item No. 2, and the request to add an additional condition to Traffic Study No. 105, stating that Removal or delivery of the rental vehicles (using large trucks) shall be prohibited on the public streets surrounding the subject site. Mr. Webb explained that previously vehicles were being delivered by truck and parking in the center of the street to off-load the vehicles. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Adams, Mr. Webb explained that the gates on Campus Drive may need to be modified inasmuch as the gates appear to be narrow. He pointed out that the circulation plan will be reviewed by staff during plan check. Commissioner Adams asked if noise from the vacuums would have a potential impact on the adjoining land uses. He addressed the proposed hours of operation between 5:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight, and the cut outs in the fence on Jamboree Road for an automobile display. Commissioner Brown stated that the plans indicate that a new concrete block wall,would be built to match the existing block wall that would remain on the site. In response to questions posed by Acting Chairman Ridgeway concerning the Fiscal Impact analysis that was included in the staff report, Mr. Hewicker replied that a transition of what is being included in the staff report is occurring. He explained the history of the zoning in the subject area, and the fact that the Newport Place Planned Community was established at a time when the City was attempting to attract new automobile dealerships. In recent years some of the automobile dealerships moved out of the area and the zoning that existed on the property had outlived its usefulness, but the only types of uses that were permitted in the areas formerly occupied by new automobile dealerships were rental car facilities, repair facilities, etc. that were subject to a use permit. However, there may be other uses in the future that the City could attract to the subject area that may generate more revenue than the support facilities for the airport. Mr.Hewicker stated that there is a Council Policy that requires the staff to provide an economic analysis to `major projects' that will be coming before the City. He could not determine if the Planning Commission would consider the subject applications to be`major projects'. -10- COMMISSIONERS MINUTES OAR\��ti�0 9 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Julie 22, 1995 9LLF90 O L ROLL INDEX CALL The purpose for the economic analysis in the staff report may have been to give the Planning Commission a point of departure as to what the property may currently generate in terms of revenue and what it might generate with the proposed uses. Commissioner Pomeroy questioned the amount of time that it takes staff to provide an economic analysis for a difference of a few hundred dollars. In further response to Acting Chairman Ridgeway's question, Patty Temple, Advance Planning Manager, stated that staff made a determination to provide the Planning Commission the option and appropriate findings to deny the projects if they so chose. In order to develop adequate findings for denial it is necessary to have information within the public record. To consider a potential denial of the use permits, it was necessary to go back to the very basis of why zoning exists, and that is the general welfare of the community as a whole. As a result, the subject information was important to support the finding that the project was detrimental to the general welfare in order to provide a legal basis for denial. Commissioner Brown pointed out that when an automobile is rented at the airport that the point of collection of the sales tax is the County of Orange., He explained how the applicant has the ability to provide additional revenue to the City. Acting Chairman Ridgeway and Commissioner Brown discussed the aforementioned comments. Acting Chairman Ridgeway commented that it is possible that the City will be servicing the airport, and the fact that the City accepts the servicing of the airport there should be a Fair Share Revenue source from the County to the City. Commissioner Brown pointed out that the plan for the Dove Street facility indicates a new rental counter. In response to comments by Acting Chairman Ridgeway, Ms. Clauson stated that the City Manager, staff, and City Council are the parties that would consider the Fair Share Revenue for the subject applications. Acting Chairman Ridgeway stated that the staff report includes a Fiscal Analysis Report, and there is a loss of retail automobile sales from automobile agencies which are not going to locate on the site. He said that if the Fiscal Report had not been presented to the Planning Commission he would not -11- COMMISSIONERS MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 22, ROLL INDEX CALL have asked the question. Mr. Hewicker explained why the County of Orange has taken a strong position with respect to how they would share revenue with the City. Acting Chairman Ridgeway suggested that the City Manager address the issue inasmuch as there is a land use change occurring in the airport area. There will be more support uses that we are servicing and not receiving benefits from,but we are burdened with their problem. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and.Mr.'Gary Semling, representing the applicant and Avis Rent-A-Car, appeared before the Planning Commission. He explained that the applicant has been working with the City concerning the traffic problems. Mr. Semling concurred with the findings and conditions in Exhibit"A",Item Nos. 1 and 2, including the added condition as stated by Mr. Webb. He said that off- loading of vehicles would be done on-site. The subject sites are critical to support the airport and the services are beneficial to the City, the airport, and to Avis Rent-A-Car. The Fair Share Assessment Fee is associated with the quick turnaround project. The administrative facility is a small improvement, but if there are 310 automobiles going through the site creating 620 trips then it would be $121 per automobile or $71,000. In response to a question posed by Acting Chairman Ridgeway, Mr. Hewicker explained that it is a one time fee that would be collected when the permit is issued. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Adams, Mr. Semling replied that Avis Rent-A-Car operations are currently located in Santa Ana. Mr. Semling stated that the City Traffic Engineer pointed out that the distance from the subject site to the airport would be shorter and quicker than from Santa Ana. Commissioner Di Sano stated that an automobile rental facility uses Campus Drive as an "air dry mode" of a car wash to the airport. He suggested that the Police Department be informed of the drivers going north on Campus Drive at high speed with just washed automobiles to the airport. Commissioner Di Sano commented that the subject site is an appropriate site for the subject use. -12- COMMISSIONERS MINUTES c`��92��9am CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL INDEX CALL Mr. Semling stated that the Dove Street facility will include the corporate sales office consisting of the Regional Vice President,the District Manager, and staff, and it is not just an automobile repair facility. He said that because Avis is concerned with their image that they will maintain ,the landscaping and they are remodeling the buildings. The employee parking area can be increased. Avis may consider customer sales on the site some time in the future. The majority of the rental car companies are doing business at the airport, and to bus a customer to the site to rent an automobile would be a disadvantage to their business. A six foot high screen wall is proposed at the quick turnaround facility on Dove Street. The wall would be constructed of split face masonry block and there would be some articulation in design. There would be an encroachment of a 5 foot setback to make the site usable. The subject uses are permitted at the subject sites, and they are automobile related supporting the airport. In response to questions posed by Mr. Hewicker, Mr. Semling explained that the direction of the enclosed car wash is to enter the premises towards the airport and exits on to Campus Drive. The blowers are located at the exit of the car wash. Mr. Semling further replied that the majority of the car washing will be done during the day and he questioned if the noise would be noticeable based on the airport noise. In response to a question posed by Acting Chairman Ridgeway, Mr. Semling replied that large trucks that would be delivering automobiles could go to the 848 Dove Street site where the truck could do a turnaround. Mr. Semling concurred that the driveway would have to be increased to allow for the trucks, and the applicant would agree with the landscape material and size that would be recommended by the City. Commissioner Brown asked if the applicant would agree to finishing two walls with stucco as opposed to split faced block, and only have signage on Dove Street and not on Jamboree Road. Acting Chairman Ridgeway suggested that the Planning Commission not design review the wall, and there is not an application for a sign to review. Commissioner Brown responded that it is in the Planning Commission's purview to discuss landscaping, walls, lighting, signage, given the sensitivity of the use. -13- COMMISSIONERS MINUTES goco��v���o q9�tir�go2o CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL 'INDEX CALL Commissioner Adams concurred that the material and frontage of the uses is within the Planning Commission's purview. Mr. Jeff Konen, Senior Project Manager representing Avis Rent-A-Car, Garden City, New York, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Konen stated that the applicant will work with the staff and the Planning Commission on the aesthetic issues concerning the landscaping, wall, and signage. He stated that the applicant would agree to either a stucco finish or a split face block finish wall, and the existing wood fence could be replaced in a manner that would be acceptable to everyone. The applicant could comply with the request not to have signage on Jamboree Road, and there would be minimal signage on Dove Street. Mr. Konen stated that the car wash is very quiet and the noise level outside the car wash bay would be acceptable. He said that the vacuums would be enclosed in a storage building. Mr. Konen concluded that inasmuch as there is a concern regarding the noise level on the site for their employees that the noise levels are mitigated from the car wash. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Adams, Mr. Hewicker explained that the sales counter could be used by Avis at their own discretion provided there was not a condition on the permit that would prohibit the customers from coming to the facility. Commissioner Adams and Mr. Hewicker pointed out that there are conflicting concerns between the traffic that would be generated by Avis, and requesting Avis to use the subject property as a point of sale to generate revenue. Ms. Temple stated that the Dove Street property did not require a traffic study because it is a similar or lessor use than the previous use. She agreed that compared to the proposed facility that the use may increase the traffic generation but overall the use would be far less than the previous use. Commissioner Adams concurred, and he said that there would not be a significant negative impact. Mr. Charles Sweigart, Avis Rent-A-Car, 4101 South Main Street, Santa Ana, appeared before the Planning Commission as an Operations Manager. In response to questions posed by Acting Chairman Ridgeway, Mr. Sweigart replied that Avis is only considering a counter at the Dove Street -14- COMMISSIONERS • MINUTES 9\Ao�pv�'T p d F9�y�9�9d CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL INDEX CALL site;that the automobiles are parked in Santa Ana;and that autom obiles are serviced in Santa Ana and driven to a parking garage at the airport. Mr. Sweigart stated that a shuttle service is not being considered by Avis. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Adams, Mr. Hewicker replied that the applicant would not have to come to the City for a sign permit so long as the signage did not exceed the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Stan Hassan, attorney representing Donald R. Lawrence, property owner of 4201 Birch Street, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Hassan stated that Mr. Lawrence supports the Avis Rent-A-Car facility. In response to the aforementioned letter from Mr.Frank Lawrenz, Mr. Hassan concurred that the issue is a civil matter. The property immediately to the north of the subject property has been approved by a use permit to National Car Rental and they are constructing a chain link fence between the properties. He questioned if there is a need for a wall against the chain link fence. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Kranzley with respect to the Fair Share Fee, Mr. Webb explained that ten years ago the City did a survey of what it would cost to complete the City's Circulation Element buildout. The study was to consider the funding sources to determine if public funds would be adequate to complete the system. It was concluded that the City could only complete approximately 60 percent with projected City funding, funding from the State, Measure M, etc. The City Council determined that future development which would contribute to the major arterials around the community should also contribute towards the completion of the system. Staff determined how much money the,City was short, and they projected the number of trips for new development. The two figures were divided and the result was approximately $121.00 per trip. The specific use of the revenue is for construction of roads. Commissioner Kranzley suggested that the Fair Share Fee be included in the staff reports, and Ms. Temple concurred. Mr. Hewicker emphasized that the Planning Commission has no authority to modify the fees. -15- COMMISSIONERS • MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH R��,9 y�F90 20 ROLL 'INDEX CALL Acting Chairman Ridgeway commented that Fiscal Analysis should only be done pursuant to Policy F-17 which addresses major projects, and he suggested that it be limited to major projects. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. Motion * Motion was made and voted on to approve Use Permit No. 3558 subject Ayes * * * * to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A", including added Condition Absent * No. 10 that the sign be eliminated on Jamboree Road. The motion further states that the applicant shall install mature landscaping and an aesthetically pleasing wall. MOTION CARRIED FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed application is a secondary use in nature which may be considered as a support service allowed by the General Plan Land Use Element and the proposed project, under the circumstances of the particular use, would not be detrimental to the general welfare of the City. 2. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed development. 3. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 20.80.060 of the Municipal Code. CONDITIONS: 1. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 2. That arrangements be made with the Public Works Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public -16- COMMISSIONERS MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 9faF9O� s ROLL INDEX CALL improvements, if it is desired to record a parcel map or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 3. That the existing storm drain and water easements be shown on the site plan. 4. That sight distance be provided at the drive entrances in accordance with the City's sight distance standard 110-L unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 5. That all vehicular access rights to Jamboree Road be released and relinquished to the City of Newport Beach prior to occupancy. 6. That the on-site drainage be collected and conveyed to the public storm drain or street as approved by the Public Works Department. 7. Disruption caused by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. There shall be no construction storage or delivery of materials within the Jamboree Road right-of-way. 8. That overhead utilities serving the site be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code unless it is determined by the City Engineer that such undergrounding is unreasonable or impractical. 9. Prior to the issuance of a business license or building permit, a detailed landscaping and irrigation plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect or landscape contractor shall be submitted to be reviewed by the Planning and Building Departments. The plan shall include appropriate plant materials of sufficient size to partially obscure the retaining wall and other fencing from view. -17- • COMMISSIONERS MINUTES - 9\'0 4- Gy o��, °°°�� T9aj CITY OF NEV BEACH F9h9`ril's- ° ROLL INDEX CALL Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, landscaping and irrigation shall be installed according to the approved plan. 10. That signage shall be eliminated at Jamboree Road. Motion . * Motion was made and voted on to approve Use Permit No. 3557 and Ayes * * * Traffic Study No. 105, subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit Absent * "A", including added Condition No. 9 as previously stated. MOTION CARRIED. FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed application is a secondary use in nature which may be considered as a support service allowed by the General Plan Land Use Element and the proposed project, under the circumstances of the particular use, would not be detrimental to the general welfare of the City 2. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed development. 3. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 20.80.060 of the Municipal Code. CONDITIONS: 1. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. -18- COMMISSIONERS MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL INDEX CALL 2. That the on-site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the Traffic Engineer. 3. That the intersection of the private drives and streets be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 35 miles per hour in accordance with the City's Sight Distance Standard 110-L. The sight distance requirement may be modified at non- critical locations, subject to approval of the Traffic Engineer. 4. That the design the control gate at the entrance on Dove Street be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and Fire Department. That the driveways be designed to handle fuel delivery vehicles. 5. That all unused drive approaches be removed and replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalk and that all work be completed under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 6. That the design of the on-site drainage be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. 7. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. 8. Prior to the issuance of a business license or building permit, a detailed landscaping and irrigation plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect or landscape contractor shall be submitted to be reviewed by the Planning and Building Departments. The plan shall include appropriate plant materials of sufficient size to partially obscure the retaining wall and other fencing from view. -19- COMMISSIONERS • • MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 9L FLO�O ROLL INDEX CALL Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, landscaping and irrigation shall be installed according to the approved plan. 9. Removal or delivery of the rental vehicles(using large trucks)shall be prohibited on the public streets surrounding the subject site. Use Permit No. 1905 Amended (Public Hearin Agenda Item No. 3 Req st to amend a previously approved use permit which permitted UP No. 1905 the est ishment of George's Camelot Restaurant with on-sale beer and wine a an outdoor eating area on property located in the RSC-H Approved District. The roposed amendment involves a request to change the operational char teristics of the restaurant so as to allow the establishment of a v t parking service on the Via Oporto right-of-way . in conjunction with the isting restaurant use. LOCATION: Parcel f Parcel Map 59-17 (Resubdivision No. 416), loca d at 3420 Via Oporto, on the northeasterly ' e of Via Oporto, between Central Avenue and Via ' o,in Lido Marina Village. ZONE: RSC-H APPLICANT: Walter Heim(George's Camel estaurant), Newport Beach OWNER: Lido Marina Village,Newport Beach The public hearing was opened in connection with this item. There be no one to appear on behalf of the applicant, the public hearing was close at this time. -20- Planning Commission Meeting Tune 22, 1995 Agenda Item No. 2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A Use Permit No.3557, (Public Hearing) Request to permit the establishment of a quick turnaround automobile storage facility for AVIS's rental fleet at John Wayne Airport. The proposed project includes washing,vacuuming and fueling services. AND B. Traffic Study No. 105, (Public Hearing) Request to approve a Traffic Study prepared for the proposed Quick Turnaround Facility for AVIS's rental fleet at John Wayne Airport LOCATION: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 92-142 (Resubdivision No. 978) and Lot 24 of Tract Map No. 3201, located at 4201 Birch Street, located on the northerly side of Dove Street; across from the Newport Place Planned Community District. ZONE: M-1-A APPLICANT: Robert H. Lee Associates,Petaluma OWNER: Donald R. Lawrenz, Newport Beach ENGINEER: Robert Kahn,John Kain&Associates,Newport Beach Application This application is a request to permit the establishment of an automobile rental storage facility for Avis s rental fleet which includes washing, vacuuming and fueling services of the automobiles; and the approval of Traffic Study No. 105 in compliance with the City's i1 4 VICINITY MAP Traffic Study No. 105 N oR�vF 0 e e- P OP SUBJECT SITE 5� �o OOL � ni jA,Ty'gN F ■ . WA Y yGo,�'l 2 a r m a a y Z Z OOIIµ(:I fIMII. AV 6`' 9 r Planning Department June 13, 1995 TO: Planning Commission-2. Traffic Phasing Ordinance for the proposed use. If approved, the study will allow the establishment of a quick turnaround support facility for Avis's rental fleet at John Wayne Airport Traffic Study procedures are contained in Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Council Policy L-18. Use permit procedures are outlined in Chapter 20.80 of the Municipal Code. Environmental Significance This project has been reviewed, and it has been determined that it is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act under Class 3 (Construction of Small Structures). Conformance with the General Plan and Zoning The site is located in Statistical Area L4 and is designated for Administrative, Professional and Financial Commercial by the City's General Plan Land Use Element. Automobile rental and storage is permitted under support commercial uses. The Zoning of the property is M-1-A which designates the site for light industrial development and support services subject to approval of a use permit prior to any construction on the site. The proposed operation of an automobile storage for rental purposes and related maintenance on the site is consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning requirements. The project is outside the Coastal Zone Boundary and approval of a Coastal Development Permit is not required. Subject Property and Surrounding Land Use The subject property is currently vacant and it consists of three parcels of land. The site is bordered by Birch Street, Dove Street, and Campus Drive across from the Newport Place Planned Community District. To the west of the property, across Birch Street is a number of office and retail uses; to the north is office development; to the south, across Dove Street is a light industrial building and to the east, across Campus Drive is John Wayne Airport. Lot Consolidation At its meeting of June 6,1995, the Modification Committee approved Newport Beach Lot Line Adjustment No.95-8. The approval consolidated lot 24 of Tract Map 3201 and parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 92-142 into one parcel of land, making the proposed development feasible. The subject parcel is approximately 2.06 acres in size. 1 TO: Planning Commission-3. Analysis The applicant is requesting to establish an automobile storage for Avis's Car Rental. The proposed facilitywill consist of a 2,300 sq.ft structure which will include a car wash and an employee office, break room and lockers. A second canopy structure of approximately 3500 sq.ft also proposed which will accommodate 4 service bays for vacuuming and fueling of automobiles. A 270 sq. ft area at the eastern end of the canopy is enclosed for mechanical equipment and fluid storage purposes. The proposed site will serve as a support facility for Avis's rental fleet at John Wayne Airport Rental cars will be transferred to the subject site by Avis employees for cleaning, vacuuming and refueling, and then returned by the employees to the airport as customers demand. The applicant has indicated that there will be no customer.service at this location. The proposed hours of operation are from 5:00 am to 12:00 midnight There will be a maximum of 40 employees at any daily peak shift The applicant has indicated that all employees working at the proposed site will be parking off site at Avis s Administrative Facility located at 848 Dove Street, approximately 1/4 of a mile away, and that all employees will be shuttled to the site. The applicant has also indicated that all major automobile maintenance and repair services such as engine and body repairs, engine tune- ups, brake repair, painting, electrical work and detailing will not be performed at the proposed facility. The applicant has indicated that there would not by any identification or business sign on the premises, however there would be a total of 4 directional signs located on Campus Drive and on Dove Street Each sign would be less than 10 sq.ft in size. The attached site plan indicates that a portion of the 6 foot high concrete block wall encroaches 5 feet into .the required 15 foot street side setback along Dove street An approval of a modification to the Zoning Code will be essential to allow the proposed encroachment Traffic impacts The proposed Avis quick turnaround facility will generate approximately 615 new vehicle trips per day which will result in traffic increases on streets in the area. A traffic-study was completed for the proposed project in conformance with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance and City Council Policy L-18. The results of the traffic study are summarized below. The study is attached for the information of the Planning Commission. The City's Traffic Engineer identified 4 intersections that could potentially be affected by the proposed project 3 intersections exceeded the one percent volume threshold in the AM and PM peak periods. One intersection exceeded the one percent volume threshold in the AM peak period only. Therefore, the Intersection Capacity Utilization (IC[I) analysis became necessary as follows: TO: Planning Commission-4. Birch Street at Dove Street (AM) Birch Street at Quail Street (AM and PM) Campus Drive at Airport Way (AM and PM) Campus Drive at Dove Street (AM and PM) ICU analysis was performed for the above intersections, and indicated that the ICU values of all intersections would remain within acceptable levels, between 0.45 and 0.67, with the addition of the proposed project The study concluded that the proposed project would have no significant short-term or long term traffic impacts. No mitigation measures were required by the traffic study. Site Access Parking and Circulation. Access to the site is provided by the existing drive- ways from Birch Street, Dove Street and Campus Drive. At the completion of the construction, the primary entrance to the site will be from an existing drive-way located approximately mid-block on Dove Street The existing drive-way on Campus Street will serve only as an exit controlled by a mechanical motorized gate arm. The site plan indicates that the two existing drive-ways on the westerly side of Birch Street and a third existing drive-way on Dove Street will be abandoned. No direct customer or public service is provided at this facility and all employees are shuttled to the site in rental cars that are scheduled for cleaning and fueling. Therefore, no need is anticipated for employees or customer parking. Based on the design and location of the pre-service area, vacuuming and fueling service islands, carwash and post-service area, it is anticipated that sufficient internal circulation has been provided. Aesthetics The project site is located across from the Newport Place Planned Community District The proximity of the site to Koll Center Newport and John Wayne Airport contribute to the importance of its location. The projects 6 foot high concrete block wall could have a significant adverse effect on the aesthetics of the neighborhood unless mitigated with landscaping to soften its appearance. The following requirement would reduce the anticipated potential impact below the level of significance. Condition#1 Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, a detailed landscaping and irrigation plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect or landscape Planning and Building Departments. contractor shall be reviewed by the Pl g g p The plan shall include appropriate plant materials of sufficient size to partially obscure the retaining wall from view. Prior to issuance of a TO: Planning Commission-5. certificate of occupancy, landscaping and irrigation shall be installed according to the approved plan. Fiscal impacts The City CounciPs Economic Development Policy F-17 states "the City's ability to deliver quality municipal services is dependent upon adequate tax revenues derived• primarily from the property and businesses located within the City.... The City Council seeks to promote economic activity within the City to increase the revenue available to provide municipal services". Currently the site is not occupied and the property tax contributed, to the County of Orange, was in the amount of $25,976.44 for the tax year 1995. The City's portion of the total property tax was $4,358 in 1995. The proposed site plan indicates that the existing office buildings will be demolished,to provide maximum automobile storage, therefore the site's projected property tax is anticipated to result in a reduction, causing an adverse impact on the City's revenue. If the proposed use permit approval is granted, the City's Business License Fees will be $100.00 plus a $10 fee per each employee. The 40 employees, as indicated by the applicant, will generate an annual revenue of $ 500.00 in addition to the property tax. Based on the operational characteristics of the proposed use the subject commercial site would not generate,any significant sales tax. Site's Revenue taxes Without Project With Proposed Project 1.Property Tax $25,976.44 $25,976.44 2. Business License 0 500.00 3.Sales Tax 0 0 Total.Revenue $25,976.44 $26,476.44 Development Fees: The proposed use of automobile maintenance/storage produces a higher trip generation than the former uses on the subject property. Therefore the City's Share Fee requirements will impose$121.14 for each additional trip Traffic Fair eq p Peneration.g The.exact amount of the Fair Share Fee would be determined by the City's traffic Engineer at a later date. The applicant is aware of this requirement. Additional Considerati ons The proposed project is related to the project that is being considered as agenda item 1. The project proposed is part of a growing trend of the establishment of parking and automobile service uses which are supportive of John Wayne Airport. While it can be argued that rental car operations are generally supportive of the dominant office use.of the area (business travelers often use rental cars), the Planning Commission may wish to consider the desirability of the quick turn around facility in a prominent location on Campus Drive. While the proposed use, as conditioned, is not anticipated to be detrimental to the environmental goals of the City, and also meets the requirements of the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance, the use of this site for the proposed quick turn TO: Planning Commission-6. around facility will preclude the use of the site by a use which may provide more direct economic benefits to the City. Additionally, other uses allowed by the existing zoning typically provide a higher level of property maintenance as well as better landscaping and architectural treatments than may be expected from the proposed facility. Therefore, approval of the proposed project could be considered adverse to the general welfare of the City since it may affect the character of the area and the ability of the City to maintain and deliver quality municipal services to the area. Conclusions and Specific Findings Based on the information provided by the applicant and contained in the traffic study prepared for the proposed project, the development will not cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of service on any major, primary-modified, or primary roadway as defined in Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and Council Policy L- 18. In order to approve a Use Permit, the Planning Commission must find that the establishment of the use will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood, or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. Should the Planning Commission desire to approve the proposed project, findings for approval are provided in Exhibit"A". Findings for denial have been provided in Exhibit"B". PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER,Director By I ( - Aziz M.Aslami Associate Planner f...\aziz\1s105\po-stfr1 Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Exhibit"A" 3. Exhibit"B" 4. Traffic Study No. 105 TO: Planning Commission-7. • EXHIBIT"A" FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR USE PERMIT NO. 3557 AND TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 105 FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed application is a secondary use in nature which may be considered as a support service allowed by the General Plan Land Use Element and the proposed project, under the circumstances of the particular use, would not be detrimental to the general welfare of the City 2. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public-at large for access through or use of property within the proposed development. 3. That public improvements may be required of a developer per'Section 20.80.060 of the Municipal Code. CONDITIONS: 1. That all improvements be constructed as requited by Ordinance and the Public Works Department 2. That the on-site parking,vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the Traffic Engineer. 3. That the intersection of the private drives and streets be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 35 miles per hour in accordance with the City's Sight Distance Standard 110-L. The sight distance requirement may be modified at non-critical locations, subject to approval of the Traffic Engineer. 4. That the design the control gate at the entrance on Dove Street be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and Fire Department That the driveways be designed to handle fuel delivery vehicles. 5. That all unused drive approaches be removed and replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalk and that all work be completed under an encroachmentpermit issued by the Public Works Department 6. That the design of the on-site drainage be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. TO: Planning Commission-8. 7. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. 8. Prior to the issuance of a business license or building permit, a detailed landscaping and irrigation plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect or landscape contractor shall be submitted to be reviewed by the Planning and Building Departments. The plan shall include appropriate plant materials of sufficient size to partially obscure the retaining wall and other fencing from view. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, landscaping and irrigation shall be installed according to the approved plan. TO: Planning Commission-9. EXHIBIT"B" FINDINGS OF DENIAL FOR USE PERMIT NO. 3557 FINDINGS: 1. That the granting of a permit for such an operation is not necessary to protect a substantial property right, and it will'be contrary to the purpose of Section 20.80 of the Municipal Code, and will be detrimental to the property, neighborhood and to the general welfare of the City. 2. The approval of Use Permit No. 3558 will, under the proposed circumstances, be in conflict to the City's Economic Development Policy. _ • Planning Commission Meeting June 22 1995 Agenda Item No. 1 (Supplement Item) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Use Permit No. 3558 The revenue table on page 3 of the Planning Commission Staff Report may inadvertently be misleading in that the table does not reflect the fact that the City's portion of the property tax revenue is in the amount of $5,753.00. The following revised table is provided for the information of the Planning Commission. Slte'S Revenue taxes Cosh'of Orange Newport Beach County of Orange Newport Beach Without Proiect Without Proiect With Project WithProiect Property Tax $33,776.34 $5,753 $33,776.34 $5,753 Business License 0 0 0 350 Sales Tax 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue 33,776.34 5,753 33,776.34 6,103 PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director By ' /4 . !(�. Aziz M.Aslami Associate Planner f..\nzizluepntt\up3558w Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Inc. _J Transportation Planning • Traffic/Acoustical Engineering June 2, 1995 Mr. Aziz M. Aslami Planning Department CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Subject: Avis Quick Turnaround Facility Traffic Phasing Ordinance Analysis Dear Mr. Aslami: ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. is pleased to submit the Avis Quick Turnaround Facility Traffic Phasing Ordinance Analysis. This report provides a summary of the findings, analysis procedures and evaluation of the proposed project, for peak period and peak hour conditions, including site access, and on-site circulation pursuant to CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH requirements. Based upon this review, the project can be accommodated within the planned circulation system, without off-site improvements. In addition, the site access and on-site circulation are adequate for the project site. If you have any questions regarding this study, please do not hesitate to call at (714) 474-0809. Sincerely, ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN CIATES, INC. Q�pFESSlpyq� EF1T F Robert Kahn, P.E. Q N0 0 Lee Royalt , P.E. Principal EXP. 12/31197 Associate RK:LR:kgd/4984 r� TA qTF O AFF1FOQ� F C JN:559-95-001 4101 Birch Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, California 92660 (714) 474-0809 • FAX(714) 474-0902 d 0 AVIS QUICK TURNAROUND FACILITY TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE ANALYSIS NEWPORT BEACH Prepared for: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Planning Department 3300'Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Prepared by: ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4101 Birch Street, Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Robert Kahn, P.E. Lee Royalty; P.E. June 2, 1995 JN:559-95-001 i( AVIS QUICK TURNAROUND FACILITY TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE ANALYSIS Newport Beach, California Ll 7:� t S ! Atli' A= ' t 1 k ..o �+ ! BIRCH STREET! Robert Kahn! John Kain & Associates, Inc. 1� TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 III. TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 A. Project Trip Generation B. Project Trip Distribution IV. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 A. Traffic Phasing Ordinance Committed Projects B. Regional Traffic Growth C. Study Intersections D. Determination of Impacted .Intersections V. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS . . .. . . . . . . . . . 20 VI. SITE ACCESS AND ON-SITE ISSUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 A. Site Access B. On-Site Circulation C. Summary APPENDICES ONE PERCENT VOLUME ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A ICU WORKSHEETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT PAGE A LOCATION MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 B SITE PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 C INBOUND PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 D OUTBOUND PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 E STUDY INTERSECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 'q . LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAS 1 TRIP GENERATION RATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3 COMMITTED PROJECTS LIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4 'REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANNUAL GROWTH RATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 5 ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 6 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . 21 �t AVIS QUICK TURNAROUND FACILITY TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE ANALYSIS NEWPORT BEACH INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND This report presents the traffic impact analysis for the proposed Avis Quick Turnaround Facility (QTA) located on Birch Street in the City of Newport Beach. As required in Newport Beach for all new development projects exceeding 10,000 square feet or generating greater than 130 daily vehicle trips, the traffic analysis conforms to the Traffic Phasing Ordinance analysis procedures specified by the City. The Traffic Phasing Ordinance study format requires that project traffic impacts be presented in progressive analysis steps. Following a description of the project location and site plan, the trip generation and distribution for the proposed project are presented. Traffic impacts at intersections are then determined for AM and PM 2 1/2 hour peak periods and AM and PM peak hours. The traffic analysis is conducted at a time frame one year after the proposed completion of the project. This time frame is selected because traffic from the project is assumed to have reached a stabilized flow condition that is typical of project traffic conditions. Traffic from other projects, which have been previously approved by the City of Newport Beach (committed projects) but which are not completed or currently generating traffic, is included in the analysis. Information on committed projects and their traffic is furnished by the City. Arterial roadways in the City which carry a regional traffic component are also identified by the City. Because the traffic volume which represents the regional traffic component increases without regard to the approval of projects within the city, the regional traffic growth component must be 1 �6 accounted for separately. As with committed project traffic, the yearly regional growth rate for each roadway 'is specified by the City. With the completion of this project contemplated in the Fail of 1995, assuming approval by the City, the analysis year for this project has been assumed to be 1996. Project traffic is then combined with existing, committed project and regional growth traffic to simulate traffic conditions during the analysis year. Project traffic volumes are first subjected to a one-percent test at study intersection locations. Projecttraffic on,each intersection approach during an AM and PM two and one-half hour,period Is compared to one percent of the traffic projected to exist in the analysis year without the project. If the project traffic volume is greater than or equal to one percent of the intersection approach volume, further analysis must be completed at this intersection location during the peak hour. Intersection analysis during the peak hour is performed using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. The ICU method'd)ogy expresses intersection performance in terms of the degree of capacity utilization for critical lane groups of the intersection. An intersection which is operating with an ICU of 1.00 Is said,to be operating at capacity. The Traffic Phasing Ordinance requires that intersections operate at an ICU of 0.90 or less during AM and PM peak hours. If the ICU with project traffic is projected to exceed 0.90, a mitigation improvement must be proposed which will cause the ICU during that time period to be reduced to at an acceptable level. For the purposes of the analysis, the incremental Increase in ci due to the improvement must be limited to 70 percent of it's intersection capacity p value to insure some reserve capacity. In addition to the intersection-analysis, the report provides a review of on-site traffic circulation, and site access from the adjoining street system. 2 �, PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site, located at the corner of Birch Street and Dove Street in the John Wayne Airport area of Newport Beach, is proposed for development as a quick turnaround (QTA) service facility for the Avis rental car fleet assigned to the airport. This type of facility provides light maintenance which is limited to fueling, washing and vacuuming, and "top-off" replacement of consumable fluids such as windshield washing liquid and motor oil. Facilities for full lubrication and mechanical repair (such as brake replacement) will not be provided at the QTA Facility but will be utilized at the proposed Avis Administrative Facility located at 848 Dove Street, approximately one-half mile away. The site location with respect to the surrounding area is shown in Exhibit A. Because the customer service area for pickup/drop-off of rental vehicles at the airport is limited to approximately 75 parking spaces, vehicles will be shuttled to the QTA Facility from the airport and returned by AVIS employees as rental demand at the airport dictates; the QTA site will not be open to AVIS rental customers. In addition, the 40 AVIS employees working at the QTA Facility will not be permitted to park their own vehicles at the site. Employees will report for work to the Administrative Facility and will be shuttled to their work locations in shuttle vans or rental vehicles that are in transit from the airport. Vehicles that are scheduled for oil change or brake service will be shuttled directly to the Administrative Facility from the airport. After receiving this heavier maintenance, they will then be shuttled to the QTA Facility for final cleaning service. It is estimated that approximately 10 percent of the daily QTA vehicle volume will pass through the Administrative Facility for heavier maintenance. The service facilities will operate from 5:00 AM to 12:00 midnight. It is estimated by AVIS that a total of 310 vehicles per day will be serviced at the QTA Facility and that 3 LOCATION MAP :% -WAYNE :::::•' m. Mir FS •:•:':'AIRPORT :':' ����- yc oti 0 Q P. Oo v OTA SITE'. ' i Sr T � S v co S0 BOWSPRIT g' DR. A�STo( ADAPIMACT�RAYTWE `rT s AVIS QTA FACILITY TRAFFIC STUDY °rt Newport Beach, California EXHIBIT A Robert Kahn,LffohnKainAssocio iq a maximum of 85 percent of the vehicles (265 cars) may be at the QTA site at any one time. The site plan for the proposed QTA Facility is shown in Exhibit B. The "L" shaped parcel will be surrounded by a six foot high concrete block wall to provide security and control access. Entry to the site will be via a single one-way entrance from Dove Street using an existing curb cut and driveway approach approximately 260 feet west of Birch Street. The entrance will be controlled by a non-motorized traffic controller. An emergency-only access through a chain-link gate will be provided from Birch Street approximately 160 feet north of Dove Street. Exit from the site will be through a single one-way, guard-attended gate to Campus Drive approximately 160 feet north of Dove Street. The exit gate will utilize a motorized gate arm. The service area will be located approximately in the center of the parcel, midway between Birch Street and Campus Drive. Fueling of vehicles and cleaning of their interiors will occur at eight servicing stations under a canopied island. A small office structure with employee restrooms and lockers and a carwash bay is situated just west of the service island. A pre-service queing/parking area is located between the entrance and the service island, and a post-service queing/parking area is located between the carwash and the exit gate. 5 SITE PLAN i w�. / ' •� �1tiR ,,M / . R i �R f; 0 AVIS QTA FACILITY TRAFFIC STUDY °�t Newport Beach, California EXHIBIT B 6 Robert Kahn, John Kain do Associates, Inc. o�� 0 TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION This section of the report discusses project trip generation and trip distribution. Trip generation rates which are appropriate for the project are identified and the resulting trip generation is determined. The distribution patterns that project trips will then use for routing through the roadway network are identified and depicted graphically. Project Trip Generation The trip generation rates selected for the proposed site use are shown in Table 1. These rates are designated by the City of Newport Beach Traffic Engineering Department for a satellite rental car facility and are based on survey data of similar facilities in the airport area. The peak hour trip generation rates shown in Table 1 define the trip generation for the project during one-hour AM and PM time periods. Peak hour trip generation is used to assess the project's traffic impacts using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology as required by the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. However, before the ICU calculations are performed, determination of impact to an intersection is first assessed through a One Percent Test. The One Percent Test reviews traffic flows during a two and one-half hour time period both in the morning and evening peak periods. Project trip generation during the two and one-half hour time periods is assumed to be equivalent to twice the one-hour trip generation values. Trip generation for the project is shown in Table 2 and is based on the maximum number of vehicles expected to be parked at the site at any one time. For the 265 maximum parking spaces, the project will generate 61 trips in the AM peak hour (34 7 Z Z TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION:RATES' PEA HOUR AM PM LAND USE UNITS' IN OUT IN OUT DAILY ESatellite Rental SPACE 0.13 0,10 0.13 0.12 2.32 Facility ' Source: City of Newport Beach, based on survey of similar facilities in John Wayne Airport area by Austin-Foust Associates, Inc., October 1991, 2 SPACE = on-site storage parking space 8 �3 TABLE 2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION PEAK-HOUR AM PM LAND USE QUANTITY UNITS' IN OUT IN OUT DAILY Satellite Car 265 SPACE 34 27 34 32 615 Rental Facility ' SPACE = on-site storage parking space 9 �� • r inbound/27 outbound), 64 trips in the PM peak hour (34 inbound/32 outbound) and 615 trips daily. Project Trip Distribution The trip distribution for the site is shown in Exhibit, C (inbound) and Exhibit D (outbound). The variation between inbound and outbound routes for the QTA Facility reflects the difference in rental vehicle shuttle travel patterns to and from the airport based on whether the vehicle needs light or heavy maintenance. All vehicles return to the airport from the QTA Facility, but not all vehicles reach the QTA Facility from the airport. The inbound trip distribution reflects the shuttling of vehicles from the airport to both the QTA Facility where light service is done, and the Administrative Facility where heavier,service is done. Most of the vehicles leaving the airport (90 percent)'travel directly to the QTA Facility; the remainder (10 percent) travel directly to the Administrative Facility but make their way to the QTA Facility later the same day. The outbound trip distribution reflects the shuttling of all vehicles to the airport directly from the QTA Facility. 10 INBOUND PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION JOHN ,o. ::-WAYNE ': . :" .::.AIRPORT.• : Q B ASP °2yo ��O 100 ,o °gMpGS n� B/ CTA SITE' �•" ' RCVS S Off? ST / 90 T / y 10 \ 10 w T � So <" BOWSPRIT DR. ADMINISTRATIVE LEGEND: sr FACILITY 90 = PERCENT PROJECT TRAFFIC AVIS OTA FACILITY TRAFFIC STUDY Newport Beach, California EXHIBIT C ii Robert Kahn , John Kamm & Associates, Inc. OUTBOUND PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION .......... . .... . .......... ...... .......... .... ...... .. ....... .. ............. . ..... . ......... ........-........ . ........... ..... ..... ..... .....JOHN-:-'.,­-"-'-' -`:-WAYNE'.. .-.-.-.,AIRPORT .. ............... ........ 100 OTA SITE LF (a 70 03 0 BOWSPRIT eRrSO DR. ATIVE LEGEND: FACILITY 100 = PERCENT PROJECT TRAFFIC AVIS OTA FACILITY TRAFFIC STUDY �0,r# Newport Beach, California EXHIBIT D . ......... Robert Kahn,,, i��Ihn KMn1__.,,) is Associates, Inc. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS This section of the report discusses the impact of project traffic determined in the previous report section. Project impacts are assessed one year after the project is estimated for completion so that the project traffic has the opportunity to stabilize at its .projected value. Because the overall level of traffic which will occur at that time is made up of different components, each traffic component is estimated separately and then combined to forecast the total level of traffic at each study intersection. Traffic Phasing Ordinance Committed Proiects One of the components of future traffic is committed projects traffic. Committed projects are projects which have been approved by the City of Newport Beach under the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. Because these projects are potentially under construction or are in their one-year maturity period, they are either not currently or are only partially generating traffic. As such, their traffic impacts are not reflected in the peak hour intersection traffic counts provided by the City. To account for this traffic component, the City maintains a database which tracks the committed projects traffic at each City intersection. The City then provides this committed projects traffic for the analysis year of the proposed project to the traffic consultant preparing the report. The projects comprising the committed projects list, along with their degree of occupancy are listed in Table 3. The committed projects traffic volume is tabulated separately on each analysis worksheet. 13 TABLE 3 'COMMITTED PROJECTS LIST PROJECT PERCENT OF NUMBER PROJECT NAME OCCUPANCY 009 Civic Plaza 96%Occupancy 010 Corporate-Plaza 30%Occupancy O18 Newport Piece 96%Occupancy , 031 Valdez 40%Occupancy 033 Koll Center Npt No. 1 TPP 00%Occupancy 034 Sae Projects 340 to 343 00%Occupancy 053 Sae Projects 530 to 533 00%Occupancy 060_ 1400 Dove Street 86% Occupancy 063 Koll Center TPP Amend.4A 00%Occupancy 065 Roman's Development 65%Occupancy 100 Fashion Island x2 00%Occupancy 111 28th St.Marina Project 50%Occupancy 126 Pacific Bail Site 00%Occupancy 121 Newport Village 00%Occupancy 122 Castaways Marina 00%Occupancy 123 Koll Center Cad's Jr. 96%Occupancy 124, Civic Plaza 00%Occupancy 125 Corporate Plaza A West 00%Occupancy 129 Hoag Hospital Extension 00%Occupancy 130 Corporate Plaza West II 00%Occupancy 134 Interpretive Center 0,0% Occupancy 135 Pacific Mutual 1601 Avoca 00%Occupancy 136 Newport Diagnostic 085 00%Occupancy 139 Pao Tel Mini Storage 00%Occupancy 140 'Four Seasons Addition 00%Occupancy 141 Family Fitness Center 00%Occupancy 341 Amendment No. 1 Ford Aaro 00%Occupancy 342 Amendment No. 1 ford Aaro 00%Occupancy 343 Amendment No. 1 Ford Aaro 00%Occupancy 555 CIOSA-Irvine Project 000% Occupancy 910 Newport Dunes 00%Occupancy 920 Bayview 00%Occupancy 930 City of Irvine Dev. 00%Occupancy 14 LEI. Regional Traffic Growth Another component of future traffic which must be determined for the traffic analysis is the amount of traffic which occurs due to regional growth. The regional traffic component represents traffic which essentially passes through the city on roadways within the City of Newport Beach. This traffic component maintains a growth trend which is not related to project approvals by the City of Newport Beach. The amount of annual growth is identified by the City for segments of roadways which carry regional traffic and is expressed as a percentage of the total traffic which was counted. The regional growth amounts are shown in Table 4. Study Intersections Because the Traffic Phasing Ordinance focuses on the impacts to intersections during peak periods, the study intersections define the specific analysis locations within the city circulation system. The four intersections which are analyzed for this report are shown on Exhibit E. These intersections have been designated by the City Traffic Engineer and are: 1. Birch Street and Dove Street 2. Birch Street and Quail Street 3. Campus Drive and Airport Way 4. Campus Drive and Dove Street 15 30 TABLE 4 REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANNUAL GROWTH RATES' PERCENT ROADWAY SEGMENT ANNUAL GROWTH COAST HIGHWAY East city limit to MacArthur Boulevard 2 MacArthur Boulevard to Jamboree Road 2 Jamboree Road to Newport Boulevard 2 Newport Boulevard to west city limit 4 IRVINE AVENUE All 2 JAMBOREEROAD Coast Highway to San Joaquin Hills Road 3 San.Joaquin Hills Road to Bison 2 Bison to Bristol t Bristol to Campus 1 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD Coast Highway to San Joaquin Hills Road 6 San Joaquin Hills Road to north city limit 3 NEWPORT BOULEVARD Coast Highway to north city limit t ' Street segments not listed are assumed to have 0% regional growth. 16 3� STUDY INTERSECTIONS tea. AIRPORT r I � Jam• P J OTA SITE vs• � S�. Op`F OG9Q o ��k. T Sp <: BOWSPRIT LEGEND: VE STUDY DINTERSECTION eR/Srp< yT �MFACIur"rn AVIS QTA FACILITY TRAFFIC STUDY crt Newport Beach, California EXHIBIT E 17 Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Inc. �v • Determination of Impacted Intersections The first assessment of the project's traffic is made to determine if the project significantly impacts an intersection. This is accomplished by analyzing intersection leg approach volumes at study intersections during the AM and PM two and one-half hour peak traffic periods. This assessment Is referred to as the "One Percent Test". During these peak periods, the total traffic volume, estimated to occur ih the traffic analysis year, on each leg of each study intersection is determined. The project's traffic contribution to the Intersection .leg Is also identified and is compared to the total non-project traffic volume. If the projects contribution on each leg is less than one percent of the non-project total, the analysis for that, intersection for that time period is concluded and,no further analysis Is required. However, if the one percent threshold is equaled or exceeded, the intersection Is said to be impacted by the project, and a peak hour analysis for that time period must be performed to determine the level of capacity utilization at the intersection. The results of the One Percent Test are shown in Table 5. Analysis worksheets for each intersection are included in Appendix "A". The results of the analysis Indicate that project volumes will exceed the one percent threshold at all Intersections for both AM and PM peak periods except for the intersection of Birch Street/Dove Street in the PM peak hour. All intersections will require further analysis during peak hours except for the one intersection noted in the PM peak hour. 18 33 TABLE 5 ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY PROJECT VOLUME GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO ONE PERCENT OF 2.5 HOUR PROJECTED VOLUME INTERSECTION AM PM Birch St./Dove St. Yes No Birch St./Quail St. Yes Yes Campus Dr./Airport WY. Yes Yes Campus Dr./Dove St. Yes Yes 19 3'� INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS This section of the report presents the peak hour intersection analysis for the intersections which exceeded the one percent threshold. The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology is utilized for this analysis as required by the Traffic 'Phasing Ordinance. The ICU methodology expresses intersection performance in terms of the degree of capacity utilization for critical lane groups of an intersection. Capacity utilization is expressed as a volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio in decimal percent for each approach lane group. Critical lane groups, whose movements conflict with each other (i.e., must move independently under the control of a unique signal phase) and have the highest V/C ratios, are then identified. The sum of V/C ratios for the critical lane groups constitutes the ICU value for the intersection. ICU calculations.assume a lane capacity value of 1600 vehicles per hour of green time for both through and turn lanes and do not include a factor for yellow clearance time. ICU calculations are presented rounded to two decimal places. To operate an acceptable level of service, the Traffic Phasing Ordinance generally requires the ICU value for an intersection to be less than 0.90 with the contribution of project traffic. In situations where the ICU will exceed 0.90, the project must propose an improvement which will restore an acceptable level of service. The results of the ICU calculations for the study intersections are presented in Table 6. The ICU worksheets are included in Appendix "B". As shown in Table 6, the ICU for all intersections in the analysis year with project traffic will not exceed 0.90. Consequently, no further ICU analysis is required for this project. 20 35 TABLE 6 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION SUMMARY INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' ICUz NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- WITHOUT WITH BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND PROJECT PROJECT INTERSECTION L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM I PM Airport Wy. INS)at: • Campus Dr.(EW) 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 3 0 0.44 0.58 0.45 0.61 Campus Dr. INS)at: • Dove St.(EW) 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0.55 0.67 0.56 0.67 Birch St.INS) at: • Dove St. 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0.49 0.58 0.49 0.58 • Quail St. 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0.54 0.63 0.54 0.83 ' When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left;T =Through;R = Right f Intersection Capacity Utilization in Year 1995 with regional growth and committed projects traffic. 21 3b 0 0 t . SITE ACCESS AND ON-SITE ISSUES This section of the report presents a discussion of issues related to vehicle movement at the site including site access and on-site circulation. Site Access As shown on the site plan (Exhibit B), the project parcel spans almost the entire end of the block on Dove Street between Birch Street and Campus Drive. Access to the site will be from a single, mid-block, one-way only entrance from Dove Street and a single one-way only exit to Campus Drive. There will be no significant problems related to site access. Vehicles will enter the site from a low-volume street with a painted median through a driveway incorporating a non-motorized traffic controller which is set 20 feet back from the inner edge of the sidewalk. Vehicles entering the site from eastbound Dove Street will turn from the median and will not interfere with left-turning traffic at the intersection of Birch Street/Dove Street. Vehicles entering the site from westbound Dove Street will turn from the single westbound lane well past the intersection. The opening of the entrance with the non-motorized traffic controller is approximately 12 feet wide and is channeled by the perimeter concrete block wall. The entrance would be improved if the block wall on the right side of the entrance is angled at a 45 degree slant to reduce conflicts with right-turning traffic. Vehicles will exit the site through a gate with motorized arm. The driveway length past the gate is approximately 15 feet and would be improved if the gate was moved 22 3� I back to provide a driveway length of at least 20 feet behind the sidewalk. This would allow the exiting vehicles to clear the gate and stop behind the sidewalk before entering the flow of traffic on Campus Drive. The perimeter block wall is set back far enough from the street that sight distance is not impaired. An emergency-only access is provided through a chain link gate on Birch Street. This access should not be used for normal site ingress/egress because of turning conflicts with the southbound left turn pocket at the intersection of Birch Street/Dove Street. On-Site Circulation Circulation within the site should be adequate for the use proposed. Vehicles will essentially flow in a one-way movement through the site as they are processed. They are parked in the staging area leading to the .service islands prior to servicing and in the storage area past the car wash after servicing. Vehicles will be moved only by Avis employees which will permit bumper-to-bumper parking and fairly narrow parking lanes. Access lanes which must be kept open for emergency response purposes should be clearly marked with painted,designations and should be at least 15 feet wide. It should be noted that a portion of the site along the north wall (but outside the service area) will be reserved as an easement for an exit lane from the parking area of the existing building to the north. The existing parking stalls in this area will be removed and will no longer be available for the employees and patrons of the retail establishments in the building. The adequacy of parking at the adjacent building should be reviewed and is beyond the scope of this study. 23 3g Summary The proposed Avis Quick Turnaround Facility in Newport Beach is a service facility to provide light maintenance and cleaning of rental vehicles in the rental fleet at John Wayne Airport. The project is located at the intersection of Birch Street and Dove Street adjacent to the airport. The,site will contain a maximum of 265 vehicles at any onetime and will generate 61 A.M. peak hour trips,'64 P.M. peak hour trips and 615 daily trips. During the two and one-half hour peak A.M. and P.M. periods all study area intersections are Impacted by project traffic with a project impact of greater than one percent except for the intersection of'Birch Street/Dove Street in the P.M. peak hour. All study intersections will operate with an acceptable level of service (Intersection Capacity Utilization of below 0.90) for both A.M. and P.M. peak hours. Site access and on-site circulation are generally adequate as proposed. Minor improvements are recommended to the entrance and exit gates to improve turn movements and queuing. Emergency response travel lanes within the site should be clearly striped so that vehicles are riot parked in those areas. 24 3� APPENDIX A ONE PERCENT VOLUME ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS L 0 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BIRCH/DOVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on AVerage winter/Spring _ Peek 2q Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume volume volume Volume Volume • � i Northbound 0 28 138 t Southbound 916 Eastbound 527 0 097 5 0 i i Westbound 272 0' 16 288 3' 7 I Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected El Peak 24 Hour Traffic Volume ® Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 23� Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: q 1' MOM T 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BIRCH/DOVE (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Inter pring _ Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected =P,,Prkoj2 Direction Peak 2 Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume " I ' Northbound 1073 0 12 1085 11 I 0 Southbound 2099 0 12 2111 21 I 0 Eastbound 324 0 4 328 3 i 0 Westbound 1120 0 52 1172 12 7 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ® Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: y FnDM T 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection QUAIL/BIRCH (Existing Traffic Volumes basedfon Average Winter/Spring 19gy Peak 4h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour 'Peak 24 Hour Peek 2h Hour Peak 24 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' I I Northbound 2201 0 34 2235 22 i 0 L bound719 0 66 8 8 0 bound 325 0 0 325 3 i 7 bound ! 246 0 10 256 3 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected El Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ® Peak 2� Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: qJ FnDm 7 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection QUAIL/BIRCH (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter pring 19 9 PM Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Protected 1% of Projected Protect Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2)l Hour Peak 21g Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2 Hour ; Volume Volume volume Volume Volume i Volume I Northbound 1054 0 12 1066 11 0 Southbound 0 i I: Eastbound 266 0 0 266 Westbound 847 0 10 857 9 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ® Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. DATE': PROJECT: FnDM T • 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection CAMPUS DRIVE/AIRPORT WAY (Existing Traffic Volumes based on AVerage Winter/,Spring 19 95) AM Peak 24 Hour Approved f Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume i Volume Northbound _0_ 0 Southbound 440 0 16 456 5 i 68 Eastbound 2750 0 46 2796 28 i 54 i Westbound 1210 0 6 1216 12 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume ® Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. NOTE: AIRPORT WAY IS NORTH/SOUTH ORIENTATION. DATE: PROJECT: 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection CAMPUS DRIVE/AIRPORT WAY (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 95) PM Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Protected Project Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume I Northbound _0_ 0 0 0 0 0 Southbound 640 0 10 650 6 68 Eastbound 1806 0 0 1806 18 i 64 I i Mestbound 4168 1 _ 0 76 4244 42 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2)1 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected 0 Peak 2-1-2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. NOTE: AIRPORT WAY IS NORTH/SOUTH ORIENTATION. DATE: PROJECT: `I � 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection CAMPUS DRIVE/DOVE STREET (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 95 AM Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2)1 Hour Peak 211 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume i Volume I Northbound 3142 0 40 3182 32 0 Southbound 1866 p 10 68 Eastbound 14 0 0 14 0 i 0 Westbound 273 0 6 279 3 I 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected El Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greaten than 1% of Projected Q Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization (LC.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: FnDM r 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection CAMPUS DRIVE/DOVE STREET (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 9 9`�) PM Pe'Regional Projects k 2$ Hour Approved Approach Existing Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 211 Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 24 Hour Peek 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume i Volume I I Northbound 2026 0 0 2026 20 0 I Southbound 4112 0 24 4136 41 68 Eastbound 25 i Westbound 673 0 1 40 713 7 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Q Peak 2, Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: IV FnDm 7 APPENDIX ICU WORKSHEETS .q q s1422SAM • INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: BIRCH & DOVE 4225 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING--------------1992 AN ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - I I EXISTING[PROPOSED 1EX1STING IEXI STING[REGIONAL ICOMMITTED I PROJECTED I PROJECT IPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio lVolume I V/C I I ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume lw/o Projectl I Ratio I I --I I I I I I I volume I I I NL 1 1600 1 1 17 1 0.01 1 01 41 0.01 1 010.011 -----------------------•--------- ----•--- ----•------------------0.2 1*1----- -- 0. 2 11* ----- --) 3200 I.................) 0.20 •--------•--.---------------.------•----.------I I MR228 I 01 61 _____..__.1 01 1 ---------------------------------- ---------I I SL 1 1600 1 I 118 1 0.07 • 01 01 0.07*1 01 0.071* ------------------------ ---------•----------••--...._.._......-----••.I ST 1 1 300 I 01 251 0_ll__'___.•01 0_11l I----R--) 3200 -------•-I------_ ) 0.10 1a I p1 ��--.--....... 01 I I 1 EL ) 1 1 45 ) I d I ol_.___._..__1___._01..__...1 .- ------ ----- --'--ET ) 1600 1 I 2 ) 0.18 01 01 0.18 1 01 0.181* I .. i ER___) I 1 9 ) 1 01 01 1 01 1 I--------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- I WL 1 1600 1 1 46 1 0.03 * 01 81 0 .03*I 01 0.031* I-----•-------------•------•----------------------------•------•- ' ......--_....._....._._. I WT 1 1600 1 1 38 1 0.02 1 01_.___._ 01 0.02 1 31.0:03l I WR 1 1600 1 1 44 1 0.03 1 d 01---0..03 I 01.0..031 IEXISTING ..........................[ . ' 048 I__.._._ ------------ - ------- 1----•........................... . .48 - ------ I (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0.49 I ---------------------------------------•--------------I [EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.------•.....................1 0.491 ........................................................ -- IXI Projected + project traffic will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be Less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be Less than I.C.U. without project .......................................................... Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM II 814225AM �v 01422SPH 0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS - INTERSECTION: BIRCH 3 DOVE 4225 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1992 PM I -•• -,IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI•PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IHovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I WC Ratio (Volume I V/C 'I I ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 1w/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I I I--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.....I I NL 1 1600 1 1 17 1' 0.01 * 01 01 0.01* 1 01 0:01{ I----•----------------------------- ----•-•- -----------------------------------------------I I NT 1 1 355 1 01 61 0.13 1 010.131 1--------3 3200 ------------------) 0.13 ---•-----•--•--••------•----------------••-- --I i NR 1 1 64 1 01 01 1 01 1 1-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I I SL 1 16001 1 411 0.031 01 01 0.03 1 010.031 1------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------I -1 sT 1 1 922 1 01 61 0.30*1 010.30 1........) 32C0 ...............T..) 0.30 *.....--•......................................I I SR 1 1 38 I 01 01 1 01 1 I-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I I EL ) 1 1 27 ) 1 01 01 1 01 1 I--------- .................. ........•................................. -I I ET ) 1600 1 1 81 ) 0.03 * 01 01 0.09*1 01 0.09� I--------- ................. ......................................... I IER ) I I 27 ) I 01 21 I 01 1 I___________________________________________________________________________________________ I WL 1 , 16001 1 2751 0.17 * 01 101 0.18*1 01o...1f36 1----•••-•-•-•..........--••...........................••••--••...---....----.......... ... Wr I 160D 1 1 160 1 0.10 1 01 151 0:11_•�--_•_31 o_11 I----------------•-------•---•-----------•----------------•-•----- 1 WR 1 16001 1 1421 0.091 01 11 0.09 1 010.091 --••----•-----1 (EXISTING .__'•-•...................I__ 0,58 �.__..__....................._.._ 1 I____________________________________________________________________________ 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0.58 1 I ____--•----•••••--•-•---•---•-•---I 1EXISTIHG + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. ...........................10.581 •-------•-•-•----.------_•1 0_5 81 ..............................................:.......... I)Q Projected + project traffic wilt be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U, will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. W/systems Improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project laprovements will be less than I.C.U. without project -------------•_-----.........____...__.......---_....________...._______....___---------- Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM It B14225PM 014200AM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: QUAIL 6 BIRCH 4200 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1992 AM ............................................................................................. I (EXISTING[PROPOSED[EXISTING[EXISTING[REGIONAL[COMMITTED[ PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT 1 V/C Ratio 1Volume I V/C I I 1CapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 1w/0 Projectl I Ratio I volume I I I I I I ---••--I----------------•-----••---__------_-.---------_----------.-----I I NI. 1 16001 1 14 1 0.01 1 01 01-_0.Ol-_,-----010.�11 .-----I--------------- I NT 1 1 696 1 01 121 0.33*I.....0 ------- •------------------ 3200 __________________) 0.33 . MR 1 1 3so... 01 51 1 01 1 I----•-------------------------•-- 01 - ----I I SL 1 1600 1 1 04 1 0.05 * 01 OI 3-05 I-----01 0-051 I-------------------------------------------- -------- I ST 1 1 277 1 01 331_ 0._10..� 010`101 -- 1 1 15 __---_1 --__-__-.o�_...___....�.....4--------I I EL ) 1 1 21 ) 1 01 01 1 01 1 I-------- .................. --...__...._.....__............................I 1 ET ) 1600 1 I 133 ) 0.11 * 01 01 0.11* 1 31 0 .11� ----•------------ ................................... I 1 ER ) 1 1 15 ) 1 01 01 1 01 1 ------------------------------------------------------------••---••-----I 1 WL 1 1600 1 1 72 1 0.05 * 01 51 0.05*1 01 0.05f I---•-------------•---------------------------------------•--------•-----•----•-------------I 1 WT 1 1600 1 1 42 1 0.03 1 01 01 0 .03 1 01 0.0 31 I•-------------------•-•--------------•-------------•---•------__.-----•--------------------I 1 WR 1 16001 1 401 0.031 01 -01 0.03 1 010.031 ----------------------------------------------------I IE%[STING ..............•----.._.---i- -0.54 1 I ----•- __----------I 1E%IST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0 .54 1 1 I -_---------•---------------------•I (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.............................1 0 .541 •......_....•........................................... & Projected + project traffic will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be Less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project ......................................................................................... Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM II 81420DAM v i 81420OPH INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ^ INTERSECTION: QUAIL 5 BIRCH 4200 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1992 PM i IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEX(STING REGIONALICOMHITTED PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI (Movement Lanes Lanes PK HR V/C GROWTH PROJECT V/C Ratio Volume V/C Capacity Capacity) Volume Ratio ,! Volume I Volume 1w10 Projectl I Ratio I I I I I Volume 1 p 1 I NL 1600 23 I0.01 0 01 0.01* I' 0 I. 0. ... NT 1 268 1 01 6-1. 0.12 1 0 1 01.1� I••---- ) 3200 _______) 0.12 ---.______. ____________________Nit __ I1 1181 4.� Q.�_.__.......�....Q.�._. I i---------------.-------------------- ............... SL 1 1600 I 1 33 1 0.12.I 9 I-•--------------•------ ----------..._.. ST 1 I 1171 I 01 28 o - 26..5.�. 0: $*.� I-------) 3200 ..._..__ --------- 0.37 •-------- ----- I I 01 I SR �..... _..... . • - 1 z3 ) i --- 1 01__ ......................0Q.!....... 1 ET J 1600 1 1 49 ) 0.07 • 0-i 1 0 07* 1 ER ) I I32I I I I 4.!....... I WL 1 1600 1 1 257 1 0.16 • 01 14 1 0.17* 1 Q.�.4_1 * I----------------••-------- .....------••- IWT 1 1600 1 1 70 1 0.04 I 01 20 1 0.06 1 0 �. 0- WR ..i_--160o ... -"-•i-____..i___o... i.......i-'-••- o f 0.05 i 0 I•-•---•---•-•---••------- ------••---------•----- 1EXISTING I 0.61 1 I--------------------------•-•-•••••----•-----------------------........................:...I '1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I 0.63 1 1 1EXISTING + COMMITTED'+ REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. ..... ...10.631 1� Projected ♦ project traffic will be less than or equal' to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 0 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systans inprovement will be Less than or equal to D.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be Less than I.C.U. without project _________^________•.........................••-...._--••____.......____•__-_..._..._____ Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM It 81420OPH CA9301AN INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: CAMPUS AND AIRPORT WAY 9301 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1995 AM ..........................•---...--....---....--...----'--^----...._......___....._......... I IEXI STING(PROPOSED I EXISTING IEXI STINGIREGIONALI COMMITTED( PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I I 1Capacity[Capacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 1w/o Projectl I Ratio I Volume I I I i I I ----------------I-_--.-_-------•------------I-----•---------------------I I NL I I I I I I I I I I --.-----.---•-------------------------------------------------------•--I 1 NT 1 1-------------------------•----------._------------------•- I I ------- MR I I I I I I I I I I -•---••--••----••--------------•---•----------••-----------•---•-_----------.------- ----I .__ St. I 1 1_.:--------•------------------ -._-----------------I I I ST I I I I I I I I I I -----------------------------------------•----- '•---•I SR 1 3200 1 1 220 1 0.07 * 0 1 8 1 0.07* 1 35 10.084 -----I EL 1 1600 1 1 205 1 0.13 1 01 0 1 0.13 1 27 10.15 I ] .-...._._._ . ------•------------ •-----•------------------------I ET 1 1 1170 1 0 1 23 1 0.37 1 0 10.371 I -ER --) 3200 i-------'I- ) 0.37 ------------------------- I 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 ---------•----------------•---------------------•-----------------•--------- - . ..I _.._...- WL I I I I I I ....I----------- --_I I I I 560 1 0 1 0 1 0.13 1 0 10.13 1 j...WR... --•---------------------- 1 1 45 1 0 1 3 1 1 0 1 I . ---.-------•----•---------------------•--------------I IEXlSTING .....................i• 0.44 1 I -----------------------------I [EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0.44 1 1 I ---------------------------------------------------•------------- ---I ]EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. 10.45 1 ..........................................................'---..._..........._...__..... .... I& Projected + project traffic will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project ....................•--.....---..............----•----••--_.._._..___._.....____..__..... Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM II CA9301AM 6q CA9301PH c INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: CAMPUS AND AIRPORT WAY 9301 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1995 PM I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio 1VoLume I V/C I Icapecitylcapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 1w/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I I I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -I I NL I I I I I I I I I I I ------------------------------------------------•-......---------------------------.--- -I I NT I I I I I I I I I I I- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -I I MR I I I I I I I I I I I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -I I SL I I I I I I I I I I I --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -I I ST I I I I I I d I I I l- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------I...... .I SR 1 3200 1 1 320 1 0.10 * 01 51 0.10* 1 351 0.11[k I-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I EL 1 1600 1 1 69 1 0.041 01 01 0.04* 1 321,0.06,I* I- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I I ET 1 1 834 1 01 01 0.26 1 01 0. 261 1........) 3200 ..................) 0.26 ............-------------- ...................=1 I ER I 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 ............................................................................................I I WL I I I I I 1 1' 1 1 I i. ....................................................................................... . I VT I 1 1772 1 01 101 0.44* 1 01 0.441* I--------) 4800 ------------------) 0.43 *----------------------------------------------I I WR 1 1 312 1 01 281 1 01 1 I-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I 1EXISTING 1 0-.51 1 1 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1, 0.58 1 1 I 1---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•---I 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. 10.611 ............................................................................................. 119 Projected + project traffic will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM 11 CA9301PH CA4220AM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: CAMPUS AND DOVE 4220 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1995AM -• - IEXISTING PROPOSED IEXISTING I EXIST INGI REGIONAL COMMITTED PROJECTED [PROJECT[PROJECT[ [Movementl Lanes [ Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT [ V/C Ratio [Volume I V/C [ [ lCapacity[Capacityl Volume I Ratio [ Volume [ Volume [w/o Projectl I Ratio [ I Volume I I I I 1 •---------•---•----------I-----•--I--------------------------•----------I j N� 1 16001 1 241 0.021 01 01 0.02 1 010 .021 -----------------------------------I l . ..--__... _ NT 1 1 1304 01 201 0.34 1 010.34t I I .NR --] 4800 i--'•--"i----'---] 0.33 *----^........................................1 285 1 01 01 1 01 I --- --- ' [. -SL---1--_1600 1 1 200 1 0.13 * 01 0 1 0.13* 1 3110.14 I-----------------i--------i•----------------------------•----------------------------------I ST 618 1 01 51 0.13 I 310.131 --------) 4800 ------------------) 0.13 ---------------------------------------------- SR 1 1 T 1 01 01 I- --- ----•----------•----•----•--- 1 -------------- -----•-----•---I 1 EL 1 1600 1 1 1 1 G.011* 01 01 0.01* 1 0 10.01� --••------------•---------------------------I 1 ET I 1 0 1 01 OI 0.01 1 010 .01t I 1 - -__) 1600 i__.__.__i____._�] l:.0li•---..0i 1 _...___0 ----------------•------.... ER I OI ( -----------------------------------I WL ) I I 45 ) 1 OI 01 1 01 I - ------------------------------------------------------------------------I 1 WT ) 1600 1 1 1 ) 0.07 * 01 01 0.07* 1 010 .07t ---•------•---•-'•-•----••----------'----•-----•------•---••........................•'----•I WR ) 1 1 70 ) 1 01 31 1 01 1 ------------------ •--------------I IEXISTING 1 0. 541 _ ----•---_-----•------•------I (EXIST + REG.GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0.5 5 1 1 I ----------------------------------1 IEXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.............................10.671 -_-•---..•-._-•---------_'•1 0:6 71 ........................................................ 1XI Projected + project traffic will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project inprovements will be less than I.C.U. without project Description of system inprovement: i PROJECT FORM 11 CA4220AM b CA4220PH INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: CAMPUS AND DOVE 4220 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1995 PH - ' • -..••••-.•---- • IIEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDIPROJECTED 1PROJECT I PROJECT I IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I WC I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I I ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I I I---••••--•-•-•••-----•-•-••--••----•-•............... _____ ..... __...... NL 1 1600 1 '1 40 1 0.03 • 01 OI 0.03*i 01 0.031* 1..........................••-----..... ---•---•••-•--- .........._......... 1 NT 1 1 769 1 01 01 0.18 1 010.181 .......) 4800 ......._.........) 0.18 .............................................. i------------------------•--------------••-•----..........----•-•---------•-----••••••------I I St. 1 16001 1 1201 0.081 01 OI 0.08 I 3110.091 1-----------------------------------------••--------••------••---•..._----•••----•-•--------I ST 1 1 1970 1 Or 121 0.41*1 31 0.411• I........) 4800 --•-•••---••••••--) 0.41 ..............................................1 I SR 2 0 0 01 I I----------------------------•----•--- ---•-------•-•------•••------------- .I EL 1 1600 1 1 1 1 0.OJ 01 01 0.01*1 01 0.011 I---------•--------•--------•-•-------I----•--•••--.................---............ i ET I I I 1 01 01 0,.01 1 010.011 I ER -) 1600 --•---•-•---••-_-:) 0.00 i-______----------------•••-•---•••---- - -I 01 01 1 01 I-------------------------•------- ---•-• --I I WL ) 1 1 193 ) 1 01 201 1 01 1 I------------------------------•-•-----... -----•-•--------------._..........I 1 WT ) 1600 1 1 3 ) 0.21 * 01 01 0.22*1 01 0.22r -•--_.....----•-.......•---•-••----•.............................••_.._...-••_..._....... .I I WR ) I. 1 133 I 01, 01 1 01 1 I-•------••--------•••••..................... 1 (EXISTING I 0.69 I------------------------------------......................•-•-•----•••-••-- ............... (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.c.U. 1 0.6 7 1 1 I 1....................................---....---•-...................................r.......i (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. 1 0.671 IN Projected + project traffic will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater then 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/syste s improvement wfII be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project -••__-- ________________•_...*---__-_-_•_ --••__-.•_•___-........______-____-.__.......__ Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM It CA4220PH i • Intersection: Airport Wy. (NS) / Campus Dr. (EW) Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing Conditions (1995) Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V/C Move Lanes Capacity Volume Ratio ------ ----- -------- ------ ---- NL 0.0 0 0 0. 00 NT 0. 0 0 0 0.00 NR 0.0 0 0 0.00 SL 0. 0 0 0 0. 00 ST 0.0 0 0 0.00• SR 2. 0 3200 220 0. 07* EL 1. 0 1600 205 0. 13 ET 2.0 3200 1170 0.37* ER 0. 0 0 0 0. 00 WL 0.0 0 0 0. 00* WT 3 . 0 4800 560 0.13 WR 0.0 1600 45 0. 03 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.44 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis V/C Move Lanes Capacity Volume Ratio ------ ----- -------- ------ ------- NL 0.0 0 0 0. 00 NT 0. 0 0 0 0.00 NR 0.0 0 0 0. 00 SL 0. 0 0 0 0.00 ST 0. 0 0 0 0.00 SR 2. 0 3200 320 0. 10* EL 1.0 1600 69 0. 04* ET 2 .0 3200 834 0.26 ER 0. 0 0 0 0.00 WL 0.0 0 0 0. 00 WT 3.0 4800 1772 0.43* WR 0. 0 1600 312 0.20 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.57 A * denotes critical movement Intersection: Campus Dr. (NS) / Dove St. (EW) ` Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing Conditions (1995) Lane Configuration:, Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V/C Move Lanes Capacity Volume Ratio ------ ----- -------- ------ ------- NL 1.0 1600 24 0.02 NT 3 .0 4800 1304 6.33* NR 0.0 1600 285 0.18 SL 1.0 1600 200 0.13* ST 3.0 4800 618 0.13 SR 0.0 1600 7 0.01 EL 1. 0 1600 1 0.01* ET 1.0 1600 0 0. 01 ER 0.0 1600 7 0.01 WL 0.0 1600 45 0.03 WT 1.0 1600 1 0.07* WR 0.0 1600 70 0.04 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.54 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis V/C Move Lanes Capacity Volume Ratio ------ ----- -------- ------ ----- - NL 1..0 1600 40 0.03* NT 3. 0 4800 769 0.18 NR 0.0 1600 77 0.05 SL 1.0 1600 120 0.08 ST 3 . 0 4800 1970 0.41* SR 0.0 1600 2 0. 01 EL 1.0 1600 1 0.01* ET 1. 0 160D 1 0.01 ER 0.0 1600 3 0.01 WL 0.0 1600 193 0.12 WT 1.0 1600 3 0.21* WR 0.0 1600 133 0. 08 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.66 B * denotes critical movement Intersection: Birch St. NS) / Dove St. (EW) • Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing Conditions (1995) Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V/C Move Lanes Capacity Volume Ratio ------ ----- -------- ------ ------- NL 1. 0 1600 17 0. 01 NT 2. 0 3200 418 0.20* NR 0.0 1600 228 0.14 SL 1. 0 1600 118 0.07* ST 2 . 0 3200 300 0.10 SR 0. 0 1600 18 0. 01 EL 0.0 1600 45 0. 03 ET 1. 0 1600 235 0. 18* ER 0.0 1600 9 0.01 WL 1.0 1600 46 0.03* WT 1. 0 1600 38 0. 02 WR 1. 0 1600 44 0. 03 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.48 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis V/C Move Lanes Capacity Volume Ratio ------ ----- -------- ------ ------- NL 1.0 1600 17 0. 01* NT 2.0 3200 355 0.13 NR 0. 0 1600 64 0. 04 SL 1. 0 1600 41 0. 03 ST 2 . 0 3200 922 0. 30* SR 0. 0 1600 38 0. 02 EL 0.0 1600 27 0.02 ET 1.0 1600 81 0. 08* ER 0.0 1600 27 0.02 WL 1. 0 1600 275 0.17* WT 1.0 1600 160 0. 10 WR 1. 0 1600 142 0. 09 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.56 A * denotes critical movement �h Intersection: Birch S (NS) / Quail St. (EW) Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing Conditions (1995) Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V/C Move Lanes , Capacity Volume Ratio ----- ----- ------- ------ NL 1.0 1600 14 0.01 NT 2.6 3200 696 0.33* NR 0.0 1600 350 0.22 SL 1.0 1600 84 0-.05* ST 2.0 3200 277 0.09 SR 0.0 1600 15 0.01 EL 0.0 1600 21 0.01 ET 1.0 1600 133 0.11* ER 0.0 1600 15 0.01 WL 1.0 1600 72 0.05* WT 1.0 1600 42 0.03 WR 1. 0 1600 40 0.03 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.54 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis V/C Move Lanes Capacity volume Ratio ------ ----- -------- ------ ------- NL 1.0 1600 23 0. 01* NT 2.0 3200 268 0.12 NR 0.0 1600 118 0.07 SL 1. 0 1600 33 0. 02 ST 2.0 3200 1171 0.37* SR 0. 0 1600 28 0.02 EL 0.0 1600 23 0.01 ET 1.0 1600 49 0.07* ER 0.0 1600 32 0.02 WL 1.0 1600 257 0.16* WT 1.10 1600 70 0.04 WR 1.0 1600 73 0.05 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.61 B * denotes critical movement l'7' Intersection: Airport y. (Ns) / Campus Dr. (EW) • Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing + Committed Projects Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V 0 L U M E S ---------------------------------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 NT 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 NR 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 SL 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ST 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 SR 2. 0 3200 220 0 8 228 0.07* EL 1.0 1600 205 0 0 205 0.13 ET 2 . 0 3200 1170 0 23 1193 0.37* ER 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 WL 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00* WT 3. 0 4800 560 0 0 560 0.13 WR 0. 0 1600 45 0 3 48 0.03 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.44 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis V O L U M E S ---------------------------------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 NT 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 NR 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 SL 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ST 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 SR 2.0 3200 320 0 5 325 0.10* EL 1.0 1600 69 0 0 69 0.04* ET 2.0 3200 834 0 0 834 0.26 ER 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 WL 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 WT 3 . 0 4800 1772 0 10 1782 0.44* WR 0. 0 1600 312 0 28 340 0.21 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.58 A * denotes critical movement Intersection: Campus Dr. ,(NS) / Dove St. (EW) Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing + Committed Projects Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V O L U M E S ---------------------------------- V C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 1.0 1600 24 0 0 24 0.02 NT 3.0 4800 1304, 0 20 1324 0.34* NR 0.0 1600 285 0 0 285 0.18 SL 1.0 1600 200 0 0 200 0.13* ST 3.0 4800 618 0 5 623 0.13 SR 0.0 1600 7 0 0 7 6.01 EL 1. 0 1600 1 0 0 1 0. 01* ET 1. 0 1600 0 0 0 0 0.01 ER 0.0 1600 7 0 0 7 0.01 WL 0. 0 1600 45 0 0 45 0.03 WT 1. 0 1600 1 0 0 1 0.07* WR 0. 0 1600 70 0 3 73' 0.05 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.55 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis V O L U M E S ---------------------------------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 1.0 1600 40 0 0 40 0.03* NT 3 .0 4800 769 0 0 769 0.18 NR 0.'0 1600 77 0 0 77 0.05 SL 1.0 1600 120 0 0 120 0.08' ST 3.0 4800 1970 0 12 1982 0.41* SR 0. 0 1600 2 0 0 2 0.01 EL 1.0 1600 1 0 0 1 0.01* ET 1.0 1600 1 0 0 1 0.01 ER 0.0 1600 3 0 0 3 0.01 WL 0. 0 1600 193 0 20 213 0.13 WT 1.0 1600 3 0 0 3 0.22* WR 0.0 1600 133 10 0 133 0.08 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.67 B * denotes critical movement 6� Intersection: Birch St. (NS) / Dove St. (EW) Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing + Committed Projects Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V O L U M E S ---------------------------------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 1.0 1600 17 0 4 21 0.01 NT 2.0 3200 418 0 4 422 0.21* NR 0.0 1600 228 0 6 234 0.15 SL 1.0 1600 118 0 0 118 0.07* ST 2 .0 3200 300 0 25 325 0.11 SR 0.0 1600 18 0 0 18 0.01 EL 0. 0 1600 45 0 0 45 0.03 ET 1.0 1600 235 0 0 235 0.18* ER 0.0 1600 9 0 0 9 0.01 WL 1.0 1600 46 0 8 54 0.03* WT 1.0 1600 38 0 0 38 0.02 WR 1.0 1600 44 0 0 44 0.03 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.49 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis ------- V--O-L-U-M-E---------- V/C Move- Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total- Ratio- NL 1. 0 1600 17 0 0 17 0.01* NT 2.0 3200 355 0 6 361 0.13 NR 0.0 1600 64 0 0 64 0.04 SL 1.0 1600 41 0 0 41 0.03 ST 2.0 3200 922 0 6 928 0.30* SR 0. 0 1600 38 0 0 38 0.02 EL 0.0 1600 27 0 0 27 0.02 ET 1.0 1600 81 0 0 81 0.09* ER 0.0 1600 27 0 2 29 0.02 WL 1. 0 1600 275 0 10 285 0.18* WT 1.0 1600 160 0 15 175 0.11 WR 1.0 1600 142 0 1 143 0.09 Sum of Critical Movements = -0.58 A * denotes critical movement • Intersection: Birch St. (NS) / Quail St. (EW) Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing + Committed Projects Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V O L U M E S ---------------------------------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- ----- -------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 1.0 1600 14 0 0 14 0.01 NT 2.0 3200 696 0 12 708 0.33* NR 0.0 1600 350 0 5 355 0.22 SL 1.0 1600 84 0 0 84 0.05* ST 2.0 3200 277 0 33 310 0.10 SR 0.0 1600 15 0 0 15 0.01 EL 0. 0 1600 21 0 0 21 0.01 ET 1. 0 1600 133 0 0 133 0.11* ER 0.0 1600 15 0 0 15 0.01 WL 1.0 1600 72 0 5 77 0.•05* WT 1.0 1600 42 0 0 42 0.03 WR 1.0 1600 40 0 0 40 0.03 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.54 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis V 0 L U M E S ---------------- ------ V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project other Total Ratio ----- ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 1.0 1600 23 0 0 23 0.01* NT 2.0 3200 268 0 6 274 0.12 NR 0.0 1600 118 0 0 118 0.07 SL 1.0 1600 33 0 0 33 0.02 ST 2.0 3200 1171 0 26 1197 0.38* SR 0.0 1600 28 0 5 33 0.'02 EL 0. 0 1600 23 0 0 23 0.01 ET 1.0 1600 49 0 0 49 0.07* ER 0.0 1600 32 0 0 32 0.02 WL 1.0 1600 257 0 14 271 0.17* WT 1.10 1600 70 0 20 90 0.06 73 0 0 73 WR 1.0 1600 0.05 Sum of Critical Movements 0.63y B * denotes critical movement 66 Intersection: Airport Wy. (NS) / Campus Dr. (EW) Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing + Project + Committed Projects Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V O L U M E S ---------------------------------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 NT 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 NR 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 SL 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ST 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 SR 2 . 0 3200 220 34 8 262 0. 08* EL 1.0 1600 205 27 0 232 0.15 ET 2 .0 3200 1170 0 23 1193 0.37* ER 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 WL 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00* WT 3 . 0 4800 560 0 0 560 0.13 WR 0.0 1600 45 0 3 48 0.03 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.45 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis -------V-- ----- -M-E-5------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- NL 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 NT 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 NR 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 00 SL 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ST 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 SR 2.0 3200 320 34 5 359 0.11* EL 1. 0 1600 69 32 0 101 0.06* ET 2 .0 3200 834 0 0 834 0.26 ER 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 WL 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 WT 3 . 0 4800 1772 0 10 1782 0.44* WR 0. 0 1600 312 0 28 340 0.21 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.61 B * denotes critical movement 6b Intersection: Campus Dr. (NS) / Dove St. (EW) • Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing + Project + Committed Projects Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis - V O L U M E S ------ ------------------------- V C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 1.0 1600 24 0 0 24 0.02 NT 3.0 4800 1304 0 20 1324 0.34* NR 0.0 1600 285 0 0 285 0.18 SL 1.0 1600 200 31 0 231 0.14* ST 3. 0 4800 618 3 5 626 0.13 SR 0.0 1600 7 0 0 7 0.01 EL 1. 0 1600 1 0 0 1 0.01* ET 1.0 1600 0 0 0 0 0r01 ER 0.0 1600 7 0 0 7 0.01 WL 0.0 1600 45 0 0 45 0.03 WT 1.0 1600 1 0 10 1 0.07* WR 0.0 1600 70 0 3 73 0.05 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.56 A PM Intersection capacity Analysis V O L U M E S ---------------------------------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ---- NL 1.0 1600 40 0 0 40 0.03-*- NT 3 .6 4806 769 0 0 769 0.18 NR 0.0 1600 77 0 0 77 0.05 SL 1. 0 1600 120 31 0 151 0.09 ST 3.0 4800 1970 3 12 1985 0.41* SR 0.0 1600 2 0 0 2 0.01 EL 1.0 1600 1 0 0 1 0.01* ET 1.0 1600 1 0 0 1 0.01 ER 0.0 1600 3 0 0 3 0.01 WL 0.0 1600 193 0 20 213 0.13 WT 1. 0 1600 3 0 0 3 0.22* WR 0.'0 1600 133 01 0 133 0.08 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.67 B * denotes critical movement 6� • Intersection: Birch St. (NS) / Dove St. (EW) Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance ` Traffic Condition: Existing + Project + Committed Projects Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V O L U M E S - ------------------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio- ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ----- NL 1.0 1600 17 0 4 21 0.01 NT 2 .0 3200 418 0 4 422 0.2'1* NR 0.0 1600 228 0 6 234 0.15 SL 1.0 1600 118 0 0 118 0.07* ST 2 .0 3200 300 0 25 325 0.11 SR 0. 0 1600 18 0 0 18 0.01 EL 0.0 1600 45 0 0 45 0.03 ET 1.0 1600 235 0 0 235 0. 18* ER 0. 0 1600 9 0 0 9 0.01 WL 1.0 1600 46 0 8 54 0.03* WT 1.0 1600 38 3 0 41 0.03 WR 1.0 1600 44 0 0 44 0.03 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.49 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis -------V-O--L-U-M-E--5------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 1. 0 1600 17 0 0 17 0.01* NT 2. 0 3200 355 0 6 361 0.13 NR 0. 0 1600 64 0 0 64 0.04 SL 1. 0 1600 41 0 0 41 0.03 ST 2. 0 3200 922 0 6 928 0.30* SR 0.0 1600 38 0 0 38 0.02 EL 0.0 1600 27 0 0 27 0.02 ET 1.0 1600 81 0 0 81 0.09* ER 0.0 1600 27 0 2 29 0.02 WL 1. 0 16-00 275 0 10 285 0.18* WT 1. 0 1600 160 3 15 178 0.11 WR 1. 0 1600 142 0 1 143 0.09 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.58 A * denotes critical movement 6°� Intersection: Birch St. (NS) / Quail St. (EW) Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing + Project + Committed Projects Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V O L U M E S ---------------------------------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 1.0 1600 14 0 0 14 0.01 NT 2.0 3200 696 0 12 708 0.33* NR 0.0 1600 350' 0 5 355 0.22 SL 1.0 1600 84 0 0 84 0.05* ST 2.0 3200 277 0 33 310 0.10 SR 0. 0 1600 15 0 0 15 0.01 EL 0.0 1600 21 0 0 21 0.01 ET 1.0 1600 133 3 0 136 0.11* ER 0.0 1600 15 0 0 15 0.01 WL 1.0 1600 72 0 5 77 0.05* WT 1.0 1600 42 0 0 42 0.03 WR 1. 0 1600 40 0 0 40 0.03 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.54 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis -------V---L---M-E-5------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 1.0 1600 23 0 0 23 0.01* NT 2.0 3200 268 0 6 274 0.12 NR 0.0 1600 118 0 0 118 0.'07 SL 1. 0 1600 33 0 0 33 0.02 ST 2.0 3200 1171 0 26 1197 0.38* SR 0.0 1600 28 0 5 33 0.02 EL 0.0 1600 23 0 0 23 0.01 ET 1. 0 1600 49 3 0 52 0.07* ER 0.0 1600 32 0 0 32 6.-02 WL 1.0 1600 257 0 14 271 0.17* WT 1.0 1600 70 0 20 90 0.06 WR 1.0 1600 73 0 0 73 0.05 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.63~ B * denotes critical movement 6�1 O�SEW PO • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH V Z P.O.BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92658.8915 Cq�f FO0.N�P PLANNING DEPARTMENT(714)644-3225 July 5, 1995 Mr. GaryM. Semling Robert H. Lee&Associates 1137 No. McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, CA 94954-1110 Subject: AVIS Ouick Turnaround Facility Traffic Study, 4201 Birch Street Newport Beach(TPO# 105) Dear W. Semling: Enclosed, please find Check No. 16141 from Robert H. Lee & Associates in the amount of$114.00, made payable to the County Clerk Office. My letter dated June 20, 1995, a copy attached, indicated the check to be payable to the City of Newport Beach. In order to facilitate the timely filing of any required documents with the County of Orange after a project's approval, funds must be available to City's accounts. We are making every effort to streamline permit processing. However sometimes, a project is delayed beyond the original anticipated date of approval and the County Clerk will not accept any check beyond 30 days of its issue. We are sorry for any inconvenience this request may cause you. Should you have any questions or need additional information,please contact me at(714)644-3236. Very truly yours, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER,Director By. % .PA- Aziz M. Aslami Associate Planner enclosure F:\WP51\...\Aziz-a\Traffic\TS 105\Gary-lt4 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach S P. 01 cffEEotney .� 1'aw 4340 &m,6w Be" GN[w/j0t� • ^ �NI6 f�2� 19141 :57.9440 June 22, 1995 Via Facsimile Transmission City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Blvd. , Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Re: Use Permit Application for commercial Property located at 4222 Campus Drive Dear Ms. Aslami: Please be advised that my client, Frank Malik, obtained a condit- ional use permit at this address, number 3543 at the public hear- ing on November 10, 1994. subsequent to that time, Mr. Malik was never allowed to take pos- session of the premises by the owner. Mr. Malik has a pending claim against the owners of the premises which may impact the proposal before the planning commission. Mr. Malik's conditional use permit may provide the basis for a law- suit which seeks specific performance. Therefore, Mr. Malik objects to the permit being issued at this time. Thanks for your courtesy and cooperation. sincerely, 4__I_0�r__ 4,1� Frank Lawrence, Attorney At Law cc: Frank Malik PORT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Ua P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 Cg4fFo R. PLANNING DEPARTMENT(714)644-3225 June 20, 1995 Mr. Gary M. Semling Robert H. Lee&Associates 1137 No. McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, CA 94954-1110 Subject: AVIS Ouick Turnaround Facility Traffic Study, 4201 Birch Street,Newport Beach (TPO#105) Dear Mr. Semling: Enclosed, please find 3 checks from Robert H. Lee & Associates: No. 15878, No. 15880 and No. 15881, each in the amount of$25.00, made payable to the County Clerk Office. These fees were collected for the filing of a Negative Declaration and two Notices of Determination for the subject project. These checks are being returned because, 1) as of April 1, 1995, the County of Orange has increased the filing fees from $25.00 to $38.00; and 2) the County Clerk will not accept a check beyond 30 days of its issue, Therefore, please submit a check in the amount of$114.00 (3 x $38 = $114) payable to the City of Newport Beach so the appropriate documents may be filed with the County after the project's approval. We are sorry for any inconvenience this request may cause you. Should you have any questions or need additional information,please contact me at(714)644-3236. Very truly yours, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER,Director Aziz M. Aslami Associate Planner enclosure F:\WP51\...\Aziz-a\Traffic\TS 105\Gary-1t3.ref 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach ROBERT A LEE & ASSOCI*ES, INC . ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1137 No. McDowell Blvd. (707) 765-1660 Petaluma, CA 94954 FAX (707) 765-9908 John W. Johnson, Architect James H. Ray, Civil Engineer TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 21, 1995 TO: Mr. Aziz Aslami City of Newport Beach Planning Department (714) 644-3236 REGARDING: TRAFFIC STUDY AVIS QUICK TURNAROUND FACILITY 4201 BIRCH STREET, CORNER OF DOVE & CAMPUS STREETS RHL #9332.20 TRANSMITTED: [ ) AS REQUESTED [ 1 FOR YOUR APPROVAL [X ) FOR YOUR USE [ I FOR REVIEW & COMMENT QTY. NO. DESCRIPTION 2 2 Site Plan, revised on 4/21/95 Based on our discussions with Lee Royalty of Robert Kahn, John Kain &Associates, we have revised our site layout and entrance to address his concerns about entering from Birch Street. We greatly appreciate their forethought at the very beginning of this project in bringing up potential problems that the city may have. The revised entrance location was Mr. Royalty's first choice and we will work our project around it. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Sincerely, ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. RECEIVED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF NEWPOIRT BEACH A=R 211995 Gary M. mling AM PM Architect 71819119111[12111213AA6 CC: Jeff Konen, Avis Rent A Car Systems, Inc. Lee Royalty, Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates G W6PECPXR9332-20.AA3 O�agW PO�,T • m CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH U P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 C,y�l FO FN�P PLANNING DEPARTMENT(714)644-3225 April 14, 1995 Mr. Robert Kahn RKJK and Associates, Inc. 4101 Birch Street Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Subject: AVIS Ouick Turnaround Facility Traffic Study No. 105 for 4201 Birch, Newport Beach. Dear Mr.Kahn: This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation regarding the Traffic Study required for AVIS Quick Turnaround Rental Car Facility proposal. The letter of authorization is enclosed for your file. The applicant has expressed a desire to have the traffic study complete between two and three weeks. For traffic data or technical questions please contact Rich Edmonston, the City's Traffic Engineer at (714) 644-3344. Should you anticipate any significant problem that could cause a delay regarding this project, please contact Mr. Gary Semling at (707) 765-1660 or me at 644-3236. If you need more information,please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, PLANNING DIRECTOR JAMES D. I-IEWICKER,DIRECTOR By Aziz M. Aslami Associate Planner F:\WP51\...\Aziz-A\Tra tlic\TS 105\Semi-Lt i 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach ROBERT Imo. LEE & ASSOCAES, INC . ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1137 No. McDowell Blvd. (707) 765-1660 Petaluma, CA 94954 FAX (707) 765-9908 John W. Johnson, Architect James H. Ray, Civil Engineer TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 13, 1995 TO: Mr. Aziz Aslami City of Newport Beach Planning Department (714) 644-3236 REGARDING: TRAFFIC STUDY AUTHORIZATION AVIS QUICK TURNAROUND FACILITY 4201 BIRCH STREET, CORNER OF DOVE & CAMPUS STREETS RHL #9332.20 TRANSMITTED: [X I AS REQUESTED [ 1 FOR YOUR APPROVAL [X I FOR YOUR USE [ ] FOR REVIEW & COMMENT QTY. NO. DESCRIPTION 1 check #15792 for $4,717.00 1 Traffic Study proposal As we discussed on Thursday, on behalf of Avis Rent A Car, we are authorizing Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates to proceed with the required traffic study. The enclosed check for $4,717.00 is based upon your proposal letter dated, April 13, 1995. We are expecting the traffic study in approximately three weeks. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Sincerely, ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gary . Semling Architect CC: Jeff Konen, Avis Rent A Car Systems, Inc. GMSISPECPJ719332.20.AA2 ONVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM • ��r t City of Newport Beach Planning Department F 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA 92663 (714) 644-3225 U A. General Information 1. Applicant/Agent: VOSMtZT 44. LE1; Phone:L707 Address: II?J7 N N�-97owe11 Bl..d. Pe1'F_4juma , GA 99a54 . 2. Property Owner: Phone: Address: B. Project Description Please attach the following materials for the project: ••Vicinity map * -Plans drawn to scale • Proposed revisions to zoning map * *-At least 3 different site photos mounted and text using underline and on 8 1/2 X 11 cardboard with a key map -'�eut notation, if applicable showing the photo locations and direction of view 1. Project name: 'Ay, 1S QTp` $I 2. Project location: eIr 181'C7-9ZH 4T 17vva '[')2r� •-T 3. Assessor's parcel #:427'121',021201_2I_22 4. Permit application #: Sa. Proposed use: KM"- ^L c/�R ST01zp.�y MP.INTP-NANG1= FAG,►).1TY _ 5b. Project size (dwelling units, gross floor area, etc. ) 2 : 100. 95;M )=T• 5c. Site size: 60 000•a*oz F-T 5d. Building height:-[ 11 6. Existing land use designations: General Plan: Zoning: PSI- I^Pc Specific Plan: LCP: 7. Previous governmental approvals: �p a S. Other governmental approvals required: CH Federal: State: mv Regional: Local CX OF t 9. Begin construction: Estimated occupancy: (date) (date) C. Potential Environmental Effects On a separate page, please provide the following information. If the question is not applicable, indicate "Not applicable" or "None". 1. Earth Please describe the earthwork that will be required for the project. Include grading quantities, and the location of borrow or stockpile sites, and haul routes, if applicable. Describe any geotechnical or soils investigations that have been conducted. Include exhibits showing existing and proposed topography, retaining walls, and erosion control devices. 2. Air Describe any air emissions or odors that could result from the project, including --mi£.^.ionz duri:igj COY:atc t{ttio.i, a.id a.:7 measu,:as t:.aL Eire PrJPOd6i d t6 red=8-'thl se - emissions. 3. Water Describe existing and proposed site drainage, and measures that will be employed to reduce erosion and prevent contaminated runoff from entering the storm drain system, groundwater or surface water. Describe any changes that could occur in groundwater levels or bodies of surface water. Is the project located in a flood hazard zone? 4. Biological Resources Describe the existing vegetation on the site, and any trees or large shrubs that are to be removed. Identify any fish or wildlife that inhabit the site. i S. Noise Describe any sources of oise that impact the site, and a• noise-generating equi2ment•a that will be utilized on the property, either during construction or after occupancy. What means to reduce noise impacts on surrounding properties or building occupants are proposed? 6. Lioht and Glare Describe exterior lighting that is proposed for the project and means that will be utilized to reduce light and glare impacts on surrounding properties. 7. Land Use Describe: a) the existing land uses and structures on the project site and on adjacent parcels; b) the project s conformance with, existing land use plans and regulations for the property; and c) its compatibility with surrounding land uses. B. Public Health and Safety Identify any aspects of the project that could present a risk to public health due to normal operations, or, due to an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or spill. Is there any possibility that the site could be contaminated due to previous uses or dumping? If so, what measures are proposed to eliminate the hazard or contamination? 9. Population/Housinc/Emplovment a. If the project is residential, please explain how the project will comply with the affordable housing policies contained in the Housing, Element of the General Plan, .and the average household ,size expected. b. If the project is commercial, industrial, or institutional, please identify the tenants and/or uses and the estimated number of employees. 10. •Transvortat ion/Circulat ion/Parking Please describe how the project will comply with parking regulations, and identify any changes or' improvements to the circulation system that are proposed as part of the project. 11. Public Services/Utilities Please identify whether adequate capacity currently exists for the following public services and utilities. If expansion is needed, explain how it will be accomplished. Please attach any written confirmation of capacity you have received from service providers. • Communications Systems • Electrical power • Fire protection • Natural gas • Parks/recreational facilities • Police protection • Schools • Sewer systems or septic tanks • Solid waste and disposal • Storm water drainage systems 12. Aesthetics Describe whether the project could potentially obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the public, or create an aesthetically offensive site open to public view. Could the project block any private views? 23. Cultural and Historic Resources Please indicate whether any archaeological or paleontological surveys have been done on the site. Could the project result in any adverse physical or aesthetic effects to any building, structure, or object having historical; cultural, or religious significance? Certification I certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached, exhibits are correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I am the legal owner of the property that is £he subject of this ippTidatton or' have been authorized-by the-owner to.act or. his behalf - regarding this application. I further acknowledge th , any false statements or information presented herein may result in the revocation of any a oval or permit granted on the basis of this information. Print name of owner or representative Signature Date =c=caaaa_axaxaaacaxxaxaxaxscaaxaaaamaxaaaaaaaaaaxxxasaaxxssaamsxxxsaaaascxxaaxaaxaaxsxasas For Office Use Date filed: Fees Receipt No: By: f:\...\JD\FORMS\ENV•INFO. Rev. 2/94 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 (714) 644-3225 INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM The Environmental Information Form is intended to provide the basic information necessary for the evaluation of your project to determine its potential environmental effects. This review provides the basis for determining whether the project may have a significant effect on the environment, as required by state law. After this information has been evaluated by the Planning Department,a determination will be made regarding the appropriate environmental documentation for your project. If no significant environmental effects are anticipated, or if impacts can be mitigated or avoided by a change or specific requirement in the projeces design or operation, a Negative Declaration will be prepared. If potential significant environmental effects are identified, an Environmental Impact Report must be prepared which focuses on the areas of concern identified by the Initial Study. After preliminary review of your application and the Environmental Information Form, you may be notified that additional information or technical studies will be required (e.g., traffic study, geotechnical survey, etc.) before an environmental determination can be made. PROCESSING SCHEDULE The time required to process the environmental analysis for your project will depend on,the nature and complexity of the proposal. If possible, the Planning Department will seta target date for public hearing at the time your application is determined to be complete. If special studies are required(e.g.,traffic study,biological assessment),the hearing date cannot be set until these studies are completed. If a Negative Declaration is prepared, a 30-day public review period is normally required prior to the public hearing. Staff will notify you regarding the hearing schedule for your project as soon as possible. FILING FEE The filing fee for environmental review is $278. If a special study or an Environmental Impact Report is required, the City will retain a consultant with the cost to be funded by the applicant. The applicant may also be required to pay a California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) review fee of up to $1,250. Planning Department staff will advise you regarding the applicability of DFG fees after the environmental review is completed. County Clerk filing fees of $50 must also be submitted with the application. Two separate checks of $25 each payable to the County Clerk are required. If you need assistance in completing the Environmental Information Form, or have questions regarding ;he anvironmeatal review procedures, please contact John Douglas, Environmental Coordinator, at 644-3225. B:\_.\roxhts\Exv-Dmo.uvs . Revised 2/94 i April6, 1995 Environmental Information Form Newport Beach Planning Department RE: AVIS QTA 4201 BIRCH STREET, CORNER OF DOVE AND CAMPUS STREETS NEWPORT BEACH, CA RHL JOB #9332.20 C. Potential Environmental Efects 1. Minor site grading only. Site is essentially flat and will remain as close to existing as possible. 2. Automobile emissions only. Site will be parking and service area for rental cars. 3. Exist site is essentially flat. Currently paved parking areas drain to storm sewer. New facility to match existing grades as closely as possible with drainage to storm sewer. 4. Site primarily paved with landscaped areas. New use will require some existing trees and shrubs to be removed. No fish or wildlife inhabit the site. 5. Noise generated will be from automobile circulation, car wash operating and air compressor operation. Perimeter fencing and landscaping will reduce noise to surrounding . properties. Air compressor located in enclosed equipment room. 6. Site lighting shown on site plan. Low level lighting used on street fronts. Typical parking lot lighting levels to be provided. Fixtures to direct light down or away from property lines. 7. Existing and surrounding land uses area commercial—commercial retail sales building to the northeast, Texaco service station and car wash building to the southeast, warehouse commercial to the southwest and airport to the northwest. National Rent A Car is currently constructing.a new facility next to our site. Proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses and is an allowed use for the site zoning. 8. Minimal risk due to automobile fueling area. Fueling are to meet all state, federal and' local codes. No public use of fueling area. 9.a. N/A ROBERT H. LEES ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 2 ii or- April.:,,. 6, 1995" w Environmental Information A 9.b. New facility will be a quick t4maround facility for their rental car fleet. Avis will have forty employees per shift. 10. A separate employee parking area at their Administrative Facility on 848 Dove Street will meet all 'state, federal and local codes. Separate entry and exit only drives will be provided for rental cars, simplifying circulation on and off site. 11. With the removal of three existing structures at this site, adequate capacity exists for all public services and utilities. 12. No scenic vistas or open views exist. A six foot high masonry wall or six foot high chain link fence with slats, as well as perimeter landscaping screen all car storage areas. 13. No known archaeological or paleontological resources exist. No building structures having historical, cultural or religious significance exist. ROBERT H. LEE 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. A:1NA9332201ENVIR0.SrM CO ' rn (714) 852-8023 April 17 , 1995 To Whom It May Concern: This is to certify that the enclosed City of Newport Beach Environmental Information form was signed by Donald R. Lawrenz in my presence on April 14, 1995 . Mr . Lawrenz' s right hand and arm are in a cast and he signed this document with his left hand . Very t u^y yours , S anley as an SH/ch ROBERT H: LEE & ASSOCIAES, INC. ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1137 No. McDowell Blvd. (707) 765-1660 Petaluma, CA 94954 FAX (707) 765-9908 John W. Johnson, Architect James H. Ray, Civil Engineer TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 6, 1995 TO: Mr. Aziz Aslami City of Newport Beach Planning Department REGARDING: REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC STUDY AVIS QUICK TURN AROUND FACILITY 4201 BIRCH STREET, CORNER OF DOVE & CAMPUS STREETS RHL #9332.20 TRANSMITTED: [X I AS REQUESTED [ 1 FOR YOUR APPROVAL [X I FOR YOUR USE [ j FOR REVIEW & COMMENT QTY. NO. DESCRIPTION 2 1 Site Plan with Building Floor Plan and Canopy Plan 1 Project Narrative 1 Environmental Review application Enclosed is the above information for your use to obtain the services of Traffic Engineer and start on the traffic study. As we discussed, we have no preference for an engineering firm, but would like to have the report proceed as soon as possible. Jay Garcia is aware that we are proceeding with the CUP submittal and are in the process of obtaining this report. Thanks for your help in this matter. Please keep me informed of anything we can do to keep this project moving ahead. Sincerely, ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gary M. emiing 4i Architect CC: Jeff Konen, Avis Rent A Car Systems, Inc. GM313PECPJ118332.20.AA1 Ili April 6, 1995 Environmental Information Form Newport Beach Planning Department RE: AVIS QTA 4201 BIRCH STREET, CORNER OF DOVE AND CAMPUS STREETS NEWPORT BEACH, CA RHL JOB #9332.20 C. Potential Environmental Effects 1. Minor site grading only. Site is essentially flat and will remain as close to existing as possible. 2. Automobile emissions only. Site will be parking and service area for rental cars. 3. Exist site is essentially flat. Currently paved parking areas drain to storm sewer. New facility to match existing grades as closely as possible with drainage to storm sewer. 4. Site primarily paved withlandscaped areas. New use will require some existing trees and shrubs to be removed. No fish or wildlife inhabit the site. 5. Noise generated will be from automobile circulation, car wash operating and air compressor operation. Perimeter fencing and landscaping will reduce noise to surrounding properties. Air compressor located in enclosed equipment room. 6. Site lighting shown on site plan. Low level lighting used on street fronts. Typical parking lot lighting levels to be provided. Fixtures to direct light down or away from property lines. 7. Existing and surrounding land uses area commercial—commercial retail sales building to the northeast, Texaco service station and car wash building to the southeast, warehouse commercial to the southwest and airport to the northwest. National Rent A Car is currently constructing a new facility next to our site. Proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses and is an allowed use for the site zoning. 8. Minimal risk due to automobile fueling area. Fueling are to meet all state, federal and local codes. No public use of fueling area. 9.a. N/A ROBERT'H. LEE G ASSOCIATES, INC. C� a.eww ww. Page 2 . • April6, 1995 Environmental Information Form 9.b. New facility will be a quick turnaround facility for their rental car fleet. Avis will have forty employees per shift. 10. A separate employee parking area at their Administrative Facility on 848 Dove Street will meet all state, federal and local codes. Separate entry and exit only drives will be provided for rental cars, simplifying circulation on and off site. 11. With the removal of three existing structures at this site, adequate capacity exists for all public services and utilities. 12. No scenic vistas or open views exist. A six foot high masonry wall or six foot high chain link fence with slats, as well as perimeter landscaping screen all car storage areas. 13. No known archaeological or paleontological resources exist. No building structures having historical, cultural or religious significance exist. ROBERT H. LEE S ASSOCIATES, INC. V:\WP\9332.20\SMVIR0.S7M CJ a.mam ww• ROBERT if. LEE & ASSOCIAES, INC . ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL,SERVICES 1137 No. McDowell Blvd. (707) 765-1660 Petaluma, CA 94954 FAX (707) 765-9908 John W. Johnson, Architect James H. Ray, Civil Engineer TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 8, 1995 TO: Mr. Jay Garcia City of Newport Beach Planning Department REGARDING: AVIS QUICK TURN AROUND FACILITY CORNER OF DOVE & BIRCH STREETS RHL #9332.20 TRANSMITTED: [ 1 AS REQUESTED [ ] FOR YOUR APPROVAL [ j FOR YOUR USE [X I FOR REVIEW & COMMENT QTY. NO. DESCRIPTION 2 1 Site Plan with Building Floor Plan and Canopy Plan Enclosed are the above plans for your review of this new project. We would like to set up a meeting with you, Janet Divan, Jeff Konen of Avis and myself as soon as possible to discuss both projects. Issues that we would like to discuss include: the planning process, fencing, landscaping and traffic assessment fees. The project would be to construct a new employee/carwash building and a canopy with four fueling dispensers. There will be no customer activity at this site, cars will be shuttled to the site by employees. The site will be used for washing and re-fueling of the rental cars. I will fax the additional employee count and traffic trip information to you and Janet Divan as soon as it is available to me. Sincerely, ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gary M Semling Architect CC: Jeff Konen, Avis Rent A Car Systems, Inc. GMS1GPECPJt19332.20.JG 1 S. •��'' I,« � 1� 1._ _ i �,r�l _- � rF.: - -.,.. _y, -. . g( /. �w a+f F •r _ a _., 3 a� _-.NNW _ r i' • '►• r� 000 . I PORT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92658-8915 PLANNING DEPARTMENT(714)644-3225 May 15, 1995 Mr. Gary M. Semling Robert H.Lee&Associates 1137 No.McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, CA 94954-1110 Subject: AVIS Orrick Turnaround Facility Traffic Study, 4201 Birch Street,Newport Beach (TPO# 105) Dear Mr. Semling: Enclosed, please find Check No. 220808 from the City of Newport Beach in the amount of$278.00. This .fee was collected for the preparation of a Negative Declaration for the subject project. This amount is being refunded, as it was discovered that this same fee was collected as part of the use permit fees for this project. Also enclosed is Robert H. Lee & Associates Check No. 15879 in the amount of$25.00 made payable to the County Clerk Office. Currently, there are sufficient funds in the account to cover Orange County Clerk Fees. Thank you, and please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, PLANNING DEPARTMENT TAMES D. HEWICK/ER, Director a, h l By ��• Aziz M. Aslami Associate Planner F:\WP51\...\Aziz-a\Traffic\TS 105\seml-ItIref 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach ;ClfyOF NEWPORT Bab 220808 ORGANIZATION ACCOUNT PURCHASE ORDER INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 010 5000 278. 00 P6947 LEE & ASSOCIATES, ROBERT H. PLEASE DETACH THIS STATEMENT THIS CHECK IS TENDERED IN BEFORE DEPOSITING CHECK PAYMENT OF ITEMS LISTED CITY OF NEWPORT B AC H 220808 A" •.. ORGANIZATION ACCOUNT TPURCHASE OflD .r INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT WIFDESCRIPTION O10 5000 278. 00 P6947 LEE 6 ASSOCIATES, ROBERT H. PLEASE DETACH THIS STATEMENT THIS CHECK IS TENDERED IN BEFORE DEPOSITING CHECK PAYMENT OF ITEMS LISTED J .09f agwnogr NEWPORT BEACH BRANCH 9023 1220 „ oee CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY NATIONAL BANK 220808 3300 NEWPORT BLVD. NEWPORT BEACH,CALIFORNIA CHECK 220808 " �"�• - NEWPORT BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92663 DATE 05/12/95 `"•«•" (714)644.3117 AMOUNT rtrtrtrtrtrtrt276. 00rtrt VOID AFTER 90 DAYS PAY TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY EIGHT DOLLARS & ZERO CENTS TO THE ORDER a:.a.,.• :•....{. ............ .+.. !,.. ...,^..,?y: yCe¢ OF LEE 8 ASSOCIATES, ROBERT H. 1137 N. MCDOWELL •' «�:.L+P...i.lti.r.i`.`u1 y............... PETALUMA CA 94954 111 2 20801311/ 1: i 2 20 160661: 0 231,16968'3-Su'. . y� Lr dro CHECK CHECK DATE TO THE ORDER OF ACCTS.PAYABLE DISC. OTHER NUMBrR_I I AMOUNT DETACH AND RETAIN ROBERT H.LEE&ASSOCIATES FOR YOUR RECORDS 1137 N.MDDOWELL BLVD. PETALUMA,CA 94954 EXPLANATION AMOUNT 90.4021 1211 ■(� ROB LEE ASSOCIATES 5879 113737 NORTH McDOWELL BLVD. PETALUMA,CA 94954 707a65-1660 79 CHECK 'AY Dollars I AMOUNT 4M OUNT 4miz � �► $ THE OF ORDER '/r1 /'/11�y/J� �'`\ 'n ��L4W WASHMD SQUARE OFFICE VO AFTER 60 DAYS 1� 7 f 203 MC DOW ELL BLVD. PETALUMA,CA 94953 n'01587911• 1: 1 2 1 140 2 181: OS09238010111 APR I"3 195 08:12AM t f I Y NF WPOR I Fit H( F P.1 SEW P°RT . • ° I � CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH U 2 P.O. BOX 1768, NPWPOR'1 BEACH,CA 92658-8915 cgCIFOR��� PLANNING DEPARTMTa Nl'(714)644-3225 April 13, 1995 Mr. Gary M. Semling 1137 No. McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, CA 94954-1110 Subject: AVIS Ouick'turnaround Facility TratTic Study, 4201 Birch Street, Newport Beach(TPO#10a'� Dear Mr. Sending. Enclosed please find a copy of a proposal submitted by Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Transportation Planning regarding a traffic study required for traffic phasing analysis for the proposed AVIS Turnaround Rental Car racility at 4201 Birch Street in Newport Beach. The proposal contains an outline of the required work, schedule of time, and estimated fire required for preparation of the task The requested Traffic; Consultant fees have been reviewed by the City and are considered appropriate and warranted The fees are as follows Consultant Fees $ 3,990 City Fees(10%) $ 399 Negative Declaration $ 278 Orange County Fee $ 50 Total Request $4 717 Please submit a check in the amount of$4,717 payable to the City of Newport Beach. Your prompt response in this matter is appreciated Very truly yours, PLANNING DEPARTMENT' JAMES D. HEWICKI R, Director By po8t-It"Fax Note 7671 Date 4 13 �s pa°geo' y T" 4jA( j SFHt_11JC� From ?IZ Sltulml mi Aziz M Asla ca nhc t',o Associate Planner ro — Phone Phone# (ip Fax# _ 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport: Beach Robert Kahn , John Kain & Associates, Inc. Transportation Planning • Traffic/Acoustical Engineering April 12, 1995 FLAP}�Nj�G 0 jARFydENT Cgrr OF 1sg5 Mr. Aziz Aslami CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 7��i9tjD6�lE]2i1i2j�i4f 6 Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658 r Subject: Avis Quick Turn-Around Facility Traffic Impact Study Dear Mr. Aslami: INTRODUCTION The firm of ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. (RKJK) is pleased to submit this proposed Agreement to provide a traffic impact study for the proposed Avis Quick Turn-Around Facility. The proposed project is located between Campus Drive and Birch Street north of Dove Street in the City of Newport Beach. The proposed Avis Quick Turn-Around Facility is a support facility for Avis Rental Fleet at John Wayne Airport. Rental cars will be brought to the site by employees for refueling, cleaning and vacuuming, and then returned by employees to the Airport. Hours of operation will be 5:00 AM to 12 midnight, and no customers will be served at the site. It is estimated that conservatively that 310 vehicles will enter and exit the site per day. Allowing for cars in transit and staging, it is anticipated that 265 cars would be on-site at any one time. The site will have 40 employees, which will park off-site at the Avis Administrative Facility located at 848 Dove Street and will be shuttled to the site in rental cars. The site will have one entrance point from Birch Street and one exit point onto Campus Drive. SCOPE OF WORK The following Scope of Work is proposed by RKJK for this study effort: 1 . Discuss the project with City of Newport Beach staff. 2. Confirm the methodology and traffic study. 4101 Birch Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, California 92660 (714) 474-0809 • FAX (714) 474-0902 • Mr. Aziz Aslami CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH April 12, 1995 Page 2 3. Based upon the City traffic phasing ordinance and City approved trip generation rates, calculate the project's peak hour and daily trip generation. Existing peak hour traffic counts will be obtained from the City documents. 4. Determine the project's trip distribution and traffic assignment to the adjoining roadway system. 5. Conduct 1 % analysis for up to four (4) study area intersections as designated by the City. 6. Determine traffic volumes and level of service at up to four (4) study area intersections for cumulative conditions with the project. 7. Identify any required traffic mitigation measures at study area intersections. 8. Prepare traffic impact report. PROFESSIONAL FEES The fee for the work outlined in this proposal is based upon personnel charges plus direct expenses as indicated in the attached Exhibit A. The fixed fee to accomplish the above Scope of Work is $3,990.00. Three copies (two bound and one original for the client's use) of the project report would be prepared. Monthly billings from RKJK will be based upon the attached Exhibit A - BILLING RATES FOR ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.. The proposed fee does not include attendance at public hearings/meetings,which may be required to secure approval of the project. If these are required and requested, RKJK would be happy to attend these meetings and billing would be based upon the billing rates included in Exhibit A. The Client agrees to limit the Design Professional's liability to the Client and to all construction Contractors and Subcontractors on the project, due to the Design Professional's negligent acts, errors, or omissions, such that the total aggregate liability of the Design Professional to all those named shall not exceed $50,000 or the Design Professional's total fee for services rendered on this project, whichever is greater. • Mr. Aziz Aslami CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH April 12, 1995 Page 3 In the event that a lawsuit is brought for the enforcement of any of the terms of this agreement, the prevailing party should be entitled to attorney fees and costs in addition to any damages. TIME SCHEDULE It is estimated that the Avis Quick Turn-Around Facility study will take approximately 10 working days to complete from the date of authorization, and date of receipt of data essential for the study. Additionally, any delays resulting from circumstances beyond our control, such as weather, shall extend the time schedule. If the City desires a faster turnaround time and the information is available, RKJK would be happy to accelerate the timing for the study. QUALIFICATIONS RKJK is located in Newport Beach, California and specializes in transportation planning and traffic/acoustical engineering for governmental agencies and the business community. The firm principals and associates have over 100 years of combined engineering and planning experience throughout Southern California at the regional, local and individual project levels. The experience of the firm's personnel in transportation planning and traffic/acoustical engineering provides the special skills necessary for determining practical and meaningful traffic solutions. Resumes of key personnel within the firm are attached. This letter can serve as a Memorandum of Agreement and our authorization to proceed. Please sign one copy and return it to us for our files. We are looking forward to serving you on this project. This proposal is valid for sixty days, if signed by the client. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (714) 474-0809. Respectfully submitted, ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert Kahn, P.E. Principal EXHIBIT A BILLING RATES FOR ROBERT KAHN JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Comoensation for Services The Consultants Billing rates for services are as follows: Position Hourly Rate Principal $110.00 Senior Associate 4 85.00 Associate 4 80.00 Senior Engineer/Planner $ 70.00 Engineer/Planner 4 60.00 Assistant Engineer/Planner 4 50.00 Engineering Technician IV $ 45.00 Engineering Technician III $ 35.00 Engineering Technician II $ 30.00 Engineering Technician 1 4 25.00 Administrative Assistant 4 35.00 Administrative Aide $ 30.00 Clerical Aide $ 25.00 General (1) Reimbursable direct costs, such as reproduction, supplies, messenger service, long-distance telephone calls, travel and traffic counts will be billed at cost plus ten (10) percent. (2) Hourly rates apply to work time, travel time and time spent at public hearings and meetings. For overtime work and public meetings, the above rates may be increased 50 percent. (3) Client payment for professional services is not contingent upon the client receiving payment from other parties. (4) Billing statements for work will be submitted monthly. Statements are payable within thirty (30) days of the receipt by client of statement. Any statement unpaid after thirty (30) days shall be subject to interest at the maximum permitted by law. January 1, 1992 Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Inc. • Mr. Aziz Aslami CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH April 12, 1995 Page 4 RK:kgd/4867 JN:559-95-001 Attachments CONTRACT APPROVAL: Approved by: Q�.iZ. • Aslarr►i ' k • � Title: A6soGIQ�Q. Planner' Firm: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Date: Q 1� ' pis 3 1 pages Post-it"Fax Note 7671 Date Z A From 7o Rn P� COJDept. Co.fi P Phone# hone# Fax# Fax# 4 SEW PORT • • m CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH U P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 cq<iFoaN�P PLANNING DEPARTMENT(714)644-3225 April 13, 1995 Mr. GaryM. Semling 1137 No. McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, CA 94954-1110 Subject: AVIS Quick Turnaround Facility Traffic Study, 4201 Birch Street,Newport Beach (TPO#105) Dear Mr. Semling: Enclosed please find a copy of a proposal submitted by Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Transportation Planning regarding a traffic study required for traffic phasing analysis for the proposed AVIS Turnaround Rental Car Facility at 4201 Birch Street in Newport Beach. The proposal contains an outline of the required work, schedule of time, and estimated fee required for preparation of the task. The requested Traffic Consultant fees have been reviewed by the City and are considered appropriate and warranted. The fees are as follows. Consultant Fees $3,990 City Fees(10%) $ 399 Negative Declaration $ 278 Orange County Fee $ 50 Total Request: $4,717 Please submit a check in the amount of$4,717 payable to the City of Newport Beach. Your prompt response in this matter is appreciated. Very truly yours, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. BEWICKER,Director By �- Aziz M. Aslami Associate Planner F:\WP51\...\Aziz-a\Traffic\TS105\cost 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach . AN ESOP COMPANY • QROBERT H . LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1137 NORTH McOOWELL BOULEVARD • PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA 94 9 54-1 1 10 (707) 765-1660 Melling AddreBS: P O. Box 750908. Petaluma, CA 94975-0908 Fax(707) 765-9908 SRIA N F.ZITA Architect JOHN W.JOHNSCN Architect April 5, 1995 JOHN B.HICKS Architect CECIL R.SPENCER Architect JAMES H.RAY Civil Engineer AVIS QUICK TURNAROUND FACILITY 4201 BIRCH STREET, CORNER OF DOVE STREET AND CAMPUS NEWPORT BEACH, CA Narrative of AVIS Quick Turnaround Facility The proposed AVIS QTA at the corner of Dove and Birch Street, Newport Beach is a support facility for AVIS's rental fleet at John Wayne Airport. Rental cars will be brought to the site by employees for refueling, cleaning and vacuuming, and then returned by employees to the airport as volume dictates. Hours of operation will be between 5:00 am and 12:00 midnight. No customers will be serviced at this site. It is estimated conservatively that 310 cars will enter and exit the site per day. Allowing for cars in transit and staging, we anticipate 265 cars on site at any one time. The site will have 40 employees; all will be parking off site at AVIS Administrative Facility located at 848 Dove Street and will be shuttled to the site in rental cars that were scheduled to be cleaned and fueled. The site will have one entrance point from Birch Street, and one exit point onto Campus Street. The entire perimeter will be enclosed by masonry screen wall or chain link security fencing with the exception of these two secured points. • R:%WPM32.20\NARRAT.IVB MARIETTA. CA SACRAMENTO. CA BELLEVUE. WA LA HABRA. CA �1EW PORT • • \ @� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 C141 Fo pN% PLANNING DEPARTMENT(714)644-3225 April 10, 1995 Mr. Robert Kahn RKJK Traffic Engineers 4101 Birch Street Suite# 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Subject: AVIS Quick Turnaround Facility Traffic Phasing Ordinance Study for 4201 Birch Street,Newport Beach (TPO# 105) Dear ivrr. Kahn: The City of Newport Beach Planning Department has received an application for an automobile rental, storage and service facility on a site that is located at 4201 Birch Street in the City of Newport Beach. The proposed auto storagetservice facility would require a TRAFFIC STUDY to determine the impact of the subject proposal on the City's Traffic Circulation System. The City invites you to submit a proposal to prepare a Traffic Phasing Ordinance Study for this project. If you are interested, at your earliest convenience, please submit a proposal to the City including project tasks, budget, and timing. A copy of the site plan has been included for your information and use. For traffic data or technical questions please contact, Rich Edmonston, the City's Traffic Engineer at (714) 644-3344. Should you have any other question or more information regarding this project, please contact me. Very truly yours, PLANNING DIRECTOR JAMES D. HEWICKER,DIRECTOR Post-it-Fax Note 7671 Date ip ,peoges� By. LI To Cray. SeMI-1144 From Aza Asi-A t Aziz A Aslami CoMept co-CITY N610/1 Associate Planner Phone# Phone# F:\WP51V..\Aziz-A\Trafrc\tslO5pro Fax# 07 — 7G5 08 ' —Fax# 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach • AN ESOP COMPANY 9 QROBERT H . LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1137 NORTH McOOWELL BOULEVARD - PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA 94 954-1 1 1 0 (7071 765-1660 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 750908, Petaluma, CA 94975-0908 Fax (707) 765-9908 BRIAN F.21TA Architect Post-It"Fax Note 7671 Data '3 10 pages ' JOHN W.JOHNSON April 5, 1995 To � From l% A S qm i Architaet COJDept. Co. JOHN B.HICKS Archltact Phone# Phone N b44_3 n 6 CECIL R.SPENCER Architect Fax" - O O Fax# JAMES H.RAY Civil Engineer AVIS QUICK TURNAROUND FACILITY 4201 BIRCH STREET, CORNER OF DOVE STREET AND CAMPUS NEWPORT BEACH, CA Narrative of AVIS Quick Turnaround Facility The proposed AVIS QTA at the corner of Dove and Birch Street, Newport Beach is a support facility for AVIS's rental fleet at John Wayne Airport. Rental cars will be brought to the site by employees for refueling, cleaning and vacuuming, and then returned by employees to the airport as volume dictates. Hours of operation will be between 5:00 am and 12:00 midnight. No customers will be serviced at this site. It is estimated conservatively that 310 cars will enter and exit the site per day. Allowing for cars in transit and staging, we anticipate 265 cars on site at any one time. The site will have 40 employees; all will be parking off site at AVIS Administrative Facility located at 848 Dove Street and will be shuttled to the site in rental cars that were scheduled to be cleaned and fueled. The site will have one entrance point from Birch Street, and one exit point onto Campus Street. The entire perimeter will be enclosed by masonry screen wall or chain link security fencing with the exception of these two secured points. i4 s Q Ca v PRP90% 51Te Dove sr F:%WPW32.20%NARRAT.NS MARIETTA. CA SACRAMENTO. CA BELLEVUE. WA LA HABRA, CA SEW POR • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 0- �/F00.N PLANNING DEPARTMENT(714)644-3225 April 10, 1995 Mr.Robert Kahn RKJK Traffic Engineers 4101 Birch Street Suite# 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Subject: AVIS Quick Turnaround Facility Traffic Phasing Ordinance Study for 4201 Birch Street,Newport Beach (TPO# 105) Dear Mr. Kahn: The City of Newport Beach Planning Department has received an application for an automobile rental, storage and service facility on a site that is located at 4201 Birch Street in the City of Newport Beach. The proposed auto storage/service facility would require a TRAFFIC STUDY to determine the impact of the subject proposal on the City s Traffic Circulation System. The City invites you to submit a proposal to prepare a Traffic Phasing Ordinance Study for this project. If you are interested, at your earliest convenience, please submit a proposal to the City including project tasks, budget, and timing. A copy of the site plan has been included for your information and use. For traffic data or technical questions please contact, Rich Edmonston, the City s Traffic Engineer at (714) 644-3344. Should you have any other question or more information regarding this project, please contact me. Very truly yours, PLANNING DIRECTOR JAMES D. HEWICKER,DIRECTOR Post-it"Fax Note 7671 Dale 1 Ok paoges1 By _tiri� To CTAR`( SeMWA14 From AZtz ASLAM Aziz I . Aslami CoMept. Co.CIT /JSVVI Associate Planner Phone# Phone# , F:\WP51\...\Aziz-A\Tranc\ts105pro Fax# a - /y GS-9908 Fex# 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach Aslami, Aziz From: Douglas, John To: Garcia, Jay Cc: Aslami, Aziz; Temple, Patty Subject: Avis TPO Date: Friday, March 31, 1995 10:09AM Jay- I spoke to Josh Stapp about the TPO study for the Avis project at Birch/Dove. He will send a project description and site plan to you. As soon as you get it, give it to Aziz so he can solicit a proposal from a consultant. Aziz will work with you to coordinate. Page 1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW REQUEST Date: June 5 1995 X ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ;X P ANSMT�ITED(PLEASE RETURN) X TRAFFIC ENGINEER fRE" EPA MIEW _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. X BUILDING DEPARTMENT _ COMMUNITY SERVICES X POLICE DEPARTMENT _ MARINE SAFETY X GRADING X REVENUE APPLICATION OF: Robert H.Lee Associates FOR: Use Permit No. 3557 and Traffic Study No. 105 DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the establishment of an automobile storage facility for AVIS's rental fleet at John Wayne Airport. The proposed site includes washing, vacuuming and fueling services and is located in the M-1-A District. LOCATION: 4201 Birch Street REPORT REQUESTED BY: June 12, 1995 COMMISSION REVIEW: June22, 1995 COMMENTS: Signature: Date: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW REQUEST Date: June 6, 1995 X ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT :X`P S—A'TTACHED(PLEASE RETURN X TRAFFIC ENGINEER X FIRE DEPARTMENT PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. X BUILDING DEPARTMENT _ COMMUNITY SERVICES X POLICE DEPARTMENT MARINE SAFETY X REVENUE APPLICATION OF: Robert H.Lee Associates FOR: Use Permit No. 3558 DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the establishment of an administrative and clerical offices and automobile maintenance facilities for AVIS's Car Rental. The proposed site is located in the Newport Place Planned Community District. LOCATION: 848& 888 Dove Street REPORT REQUESTED BY: June 12, 1995 COMMISSION REVIEW: June22, 1995 COMMENTS: Signature: �� Date: G �� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW REQUEST Date: June 5 1995 X ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT r-XPLTT�CHED"(PLEASE RETURN) X�_ TR�TC-ENGINEE}Z }�~ X_ FIRE DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. X BUILDING DEPARTMENT _ COMMUNITY SERVICES X POLICE DEPARTMENT _ MARINE SAFETY X GRADING X REVENUE APPLICATION OF: Robert H. Lee Associates FOR: Use Permit No. 3557 and Traffic Study No. 105 DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the establishment of an automobile storage facility for AVIS's rental fleet at John Wayne Airport. The proposed site includes washing, vacuuming and fueling services and is located in the M-1-A District. LOCATION: 4201 Birch Street REPORT REQUESTED BY: June 12, 1995 COMMISSION REVIEW: June 22, 1995 COMMENTS: J� A Signature: fl. 11 r Date: r M June 15, 1995 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION SUBJECT: USE PERMIT NO. 3557 and Traffic Study No. 105 4201 Birch Street CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONS: 1. The traffic study has been reviewed and found in compliance with the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. 2. Any adverse impacts from the reduction of parking for the building adjacent to the project should be identified. 3. Large trucks delivering or removing rental vehicles shall be unloaded or loaded on private property. The public street shall not be used for this purpose. F:\HOME\Divan\planrevu\avisqta 6.14.95 OTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 0 Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach will hold a public hearing on the application of Robert H.Lee Associates for Use Permit No 3557 and Traffic Study No. 105 on property located at 4201 Birch Street. Request to permit the establishment of an automobile storage facility for Avis's automobile rental fleet on property located in the M 1 A District The proposal includes washing vacuuming and fueling services of the automobiles: and the approval of a traffic study for the proposed development Also included in the application is a modification to the Zoning Code to allow a 6 foot high concrete block wall to encroach 5 feet into the required 15 foot street side setback along Dove Street. This project has been reviewed, and it has been determined that it is categorically exempt under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Notice is hereby further given that said public hearing will be held on the 22nd day of June 1995, at the hour of 7.30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Newport Beach City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, at which time and place any and all persons interested may appear and be heard thereon. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. For information call(714)644-3200. Garold Adams, Secretary,Planning Commission, City ofNewport Beach. NOTE: The expense of this notice is paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant. VICINITY MAP Traffic Study No. 105 -:JOHN :.-AR PO T• : �J�� �icy�lSoN �i 2P a ?� G � A m a0 S0 C . BOWSPRIT ` DR. AF CUTY ATWE T Attachment 3 _ oiv-1.36b 7J� /0L NAME PHONE APPLICANT: CONSULTANTS: �r DATE DEPOSIT FEES PAYMENT REMAINING BALANCE • � a�g' - � 9 o Oa 5/s z C65 p��gWPpR O CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CASH RECEIPT $ NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92663 �CICOPNP 56505 RECEIVED 8Y:KW CUSTOMERtROBERT H. LEE ASSOC ZONING; °4 SUBDIVISION FEES4201 BIRCH ST/AVI.S 010-5000 $276, 00 TRAFFIC STUDIES 010-2300 $3,950.00 ENVIRONMENTAL FEES 010-5010 $399. 00 COUNTY FILING FEES/PLANNI 010-2243 $50. O0 t, 1 TOTAL DUE } 4,717. 00 CASH- PAID CHECK: PAID~;UIEC1 CVO , ` ,tea ' TENDERED CHANGE $.00 �4a717.,do 15'732 r >"' ` $4a717. 00 . �� DATE — •<<�'4f17745� JTME't,ti2�3'3:38 t PO a @� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH u 2 P.O.BOX 1768,NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92658.8915 a.. °gcrcoaN r Building Department - (714) 644-3288/3289 • FEE RECEIPT DATE �1 i%S PLAN CHECK N0. Received From Job Address Building Plan Check - Valuation $ 010-5002 S Zoning Plan Check .....................................010-5003 $ Grading Plan Check - Cu. Yds. 010-5004 $ Fire Plan Check ....................................... 010-5055 $ Overtime Plan Check - B G..........................010-5002/5004 $ Additional Building Plan Check .........................010-5002 $ Special Inspection......................................010-5008 $ Preliminary Code Compliance Review ................... 0010-5g0y0-2 $ IA Reinspection B E H P............................... A LU s Reinspection Fire ................................. 010-5050 $ Temporary Electric........... .......................APRIU61995 Temporary Gas...........................................010-4616 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy .........CITY.. OF NRYPSO BE�COf� .... Underground Utilities Waiver ....................... ....010-2225 $ Grease Interceptor..........) .1'. ?..., ZLii' ..........010-4620 $ Planning Department Fees..lll� � �L !..1 iG.�.......010-5000 $a? . �b Sale of Maps & Publications.. ..........................010-5812 $ Determination of Unreasonable Hardship..................010-5018 $ Microfilm Copies/Photocopies............................010-5019 $ Hazardous Material Disclosure...........................010-5021 $ Fire Dept. Hazardous Material Review....................010-5058 $ Other T 5 D D —z3O0 $ 3 9 0.00 0/(9'"60/0 3qq, 60 X RECEIVED BY: /TOTAL FEE5.3 $ 50)00 NOTICE: Plan Check expires 180 days after application. FEE ECEIP'j N0. (f%feertpt6-94) - — Robert Kahn , John Kain & Associates, Inc. Transportation Planning • Traffic/Acoustical Engineering MR. AZIZ M. ASLAMI Date: 07-Jul-95 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 ,NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 SUBJECT: ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. MONTHLY INVOICE TIME PERIOD: JUNE 1 - 30, 1995 Client Name: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Invoice No. : 4178 P.O. #: 15149 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JOB NUMBER DESCRIPTION STAFF RATE HOURS AMOUNT --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 559-95-001 AVIS QUICK TURN- PRINCIPAL $110 2 . 0 $220. 00 AROUND FACILITY ENGINEER $60 0.0 $0.00 TRAF. IMPACT STUDY ENGR. TECH. III $35 1. 0 $35.00 ADMIN. ASSIST. $35 1. 0 $35.00 • - ------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- - - SUBTOTAL LABOR $290.00 DIRECT COSTS --------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPRO $16.30 OTHER - DELIVERY $9.68 OTHER - MISCELLANEOUS $2.02 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS $28.00 TOTAL INVOICE THIS MONTH $318.00 PROVED FOR PAYMENT - Planning Diroctor fl6 ic.•. ,t�XlOt f-4 No.. C 4101 Birch Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, California 92660 (714) 474-0809 • FAX (714) 474-0902 !Robert Kahn , John Kain E:: & Associates, Inc. • Transportation Planning • Traffic/Acoustical Engineering REPRODUCTION CHARGES JN: cjCJ� `�S- (jL7 Date: 45 h J Bill to: Charge Job Name I Copies WS) • p=� ��„ � �tu;�� 3� �� 3b Total Due $ (�,3d • 4101 Birch Street; Suite 100, Newport Beach,caulomia 92660 (714) 474-0809 • FAX(714)474-0902 INVOICE NO. EXPRESS 1�f 1,7'7 1 RADIO DISPATCHED•(714) 852.9220•(800)922.9942 DATE JO8 NUMBER AUTHORIZED BY •�YPE OF SERVICE—PLEASE CHECK BOX OF DESIRED SERVICE DIRECT PACKAGE DELIVERED DIRECT-NO STOPS ❑ 3 HOUR PACKAGE DELIVERED WITHIN 3 HOURS (CUTOFF TIME 2:00 P.M.) Cl 5 HOUR PACKAGE DELIVERED WITHIN 5 HOURS a' (CUTOFF TIME 1Z00 NOON) t ❑ OVERNIGHT PACKAGE DELIVERED BEFORE NOON FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY.(CUTOFF TIME 6.•00 P.M.) ❑ AIR EXPRESS NEXT FLIGHT OUT,DOOR TO DOOR DELIVERY ANYWHERE IN UNITED STATES.NONSTOP. BILL DELIVER CH ES TO' Ac NAME il1Y ��i ADDRESS !` CITY.ZIP PICK-UP FROM- I ^'•+ i- NAME � L • �'��. / -ADDRESS r , GITY,ZIP% - •�'•' �c•. . DELIVE/RTO:y 'C . �z`1Z. •• .(�5 an1 °;; NAME(Z, l �� lQ t[_LO1 Q( ADDRESS ZpWo CITY,STATE,ZIP t, PHONE lq I� l �( •RECEIVED,BY: :..:, :• •� PLEASE N LEGIBLY DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS: Dql .D.1 TIME OF rltJ k 1 DEL O. �f O RETURN -, xl WAIT.TIME 9 • b8 ► TOTAL CHARGE Ou ads oP to am is info ro SYA 00.CaOks shad make a effort la 00Bmy.Checks aazale0 is CA D's"q tr a We my al a ON"me a Ins arwrig ft=we FILE COPY • CPLANNIN�4DEPA �B RTMEN Robert Kahn , John Kain JU;�AM ;395 • & Associates, Inc. PM t�t2t3t4t5t6 Transportation Planning • Traffic/Acoustical Engineering MR. AZIZ M. ASLAMI Date: 02-Jun-95 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 SUBJECT: ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. MONTHLY INVOICE TIME PERIOD: MAY 1 - 31, 1995 Client Name: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Invoice No. : 4115 P.O. #: 15149 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JOB NUMBER DESCRIPTION STAFF RATE HOURS AMOUNT --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 559-95-001 AVIS QUICK TURN- PRINCIPAL $110 4. 0 $440. 00 AROUND FACILITY ENGINEER $60 18. 0 $1, 080.00 TRAF. IMPACT STUDY ENGR. TECH. III $35 0.0 $0.00 ADMIN. ASSIST. $35 0. 0 $0. 00 • -------------------------------------------------------------------'------- SUBTOTAL LABOR $1 520.00 DIRECT COSTS REPRO $8.89 COUNTS $0.00 OTHER - OCB $0.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS $8.89 TOTAL INVOICE THIS MONTH $1,528.89 NPI AGI VED FOR PAYMENT Py Iannia� .actor •,�,.': . a�;~g�} its • P0�/�/�`y` '�':�`� • o�a�a�oa . 4101 Birch Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, California 92660 (714) 474-0809 • FAX(714) 474-0902 SOLD TO: :a.{ ,�. � r�- _� gin•=• ❑TAXABLERECEIVE Eastlake Graphics 4101 SiY::h 3:L^.0t :,'At 9. RESALE -i^.3ch, Cal. 92561) -4 ;cv �coD MAY - 51995 3901 Westerly Place,Sulte Ill CALL FOR ❑TERMS,NETaX4* Newport Beach,CA 92660 Fax p44)752.5542 PICK-UP: NEWPORT BEACH:75Z 7755 r WORK ORDERIIWOICENO PO0 ORDERLWE nMEWAMED IL +iICr �:I'.1 INVOICE DATE JOB �✓ +r. PFK)NE s f i 4 - r '• r c SSUED BY DIAZO PRINIS OF EACH V XEROX NO. SERA BOND O G DESCRIPTION H QPoohtReod QReva�seRead 1rulM 08%x11 AMOUNT LACK L4a ❑8%x14 11NE PRE& Q REG. Q ERpS, Q WW Q ERAS.VEL A11 x 11 Y NiDERY: iS° r* .•� ❑STAPLE QEDGEBWD 01005E QtULLB81D QN�E Q� QMEDKIM QDAAIt fv_.•=.^r-i_i SPECIALmRIICIIONS: LL _ NON•TAXABIE I,1li. )mot rf I' s CC�i ,t $U&TOTAL SHIPORIGNUSTO: TAX 5. SHIP PONTS 10: TOW. Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Inc. Transportation Planning • Traffic/Acoustical Engineering MR. AZIZ M. ASLAMI Date: 03-May-95 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 SUBJECT: ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. MONTHLY INVOICE TIME PERIOD: APRIL 1 - 30, 1995 Client Name: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Invoice No. : 4070 P.O. #: 15149 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ------------ -------------------------------------------- ------------------- JOB NUMBER DESCRIPTION STAFF RATE HOURS AMOUNT ------------------------------------------------------------------- 559-95-001 AVIS QUICK TURN- PRINCIPAL $110 7.0 $770.00 320.00 AROUND IMPACTISTUDY ENGR. TECH. III $35 ENGINEER $60TY 21.5 $1�$52.50 ADMIN. ASSIST. $35 0.0 $0.00 SUBTOTAL LABOR $2,142.50 DIRECT COSTS REPRO $0. 00 COUNTS $0.00 OTHER - OCB $0.00 SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS $0.00 TOTAL INVOICE THIS MONTH ------------ v $2,142.50 Pik:.. CITY OF P BC- ' By Cl bra t'M lannirt Director U D/D- 3 Dv 4101 Birch Street,Suite 100, Newport Beach, California 92660 (714) 474-0809 • FAX (714) 474-0902 aEWRr PUR SE ORDER _ ' • PAGE ra � o� CITY OF N PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER PORT BEACH 154 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD 15149 u r P.O. BOX 1768 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658-8915 " 6 ttFOR PHONE: (714) 644-3118 � PURCH.ORDER DATE DATE REQUIRED REQUISITION NO. VENDOR NO DESCRIPTION VENDOR SHIP Y"kHN. IIAIN & ASSOC. , INC, TO CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 4101 BIRCH STREET SUITE 100 PLA14NITIG DEPARTMENT NEWPORT BEACHt CA 02GG0 3300 NEWPORT BLVD. NEWPORT BEACH, CALir. 02CG3 CONFIRM. BLANKET FINAL PAYMENTTERMS FREIGHT NQ QUANTITY UNIT OF MEASURE COMMODITY CODE UNIT PRICE EXTENSIbN ATTII: ROBERT RAHN PROVIDE A TR.LV IC VIPACT STUDS.' rM THE PROMM AVIS QUICK TURN -AROUND FACILITY LOCATED AT 4201 BIRCH ST. (TSI,t 105) PER CITY I',E?;1.JIRE?.1ENTS AND 'x'tdUR rr.OroSAL DATED 4/12/05. 01 1 .00 flGl ^fS3a #tjJll.00 3t'J00.00 STUDY AS DCSCRIMD AEOVE, SUBTOTAL 3,590.00 rItEIGHT 0.00 TV 11.00 PURCIIA8r 4)ADER TOTAL 3,990.00 I ORGANIZATION ACCOUNT PROJt CT PROJECTACCOUN7 AMOUNT 010 2300 3 ,090.00 TOTAL PUr.CHASE ORDER 3.000.00 Aye pliN1E Accrdeanpo he sella order by.,c.,acknowlidl,¢rwla be herniate nic by term,nt Inand whole orndliku in pad dedlea the the,.Printecalled far an the ByeaecpanptNs oVPum amWdar Tim son conditions onditons mad and aemeatabl tmme findoontlldono of ioatho tare those Issue by the BY .Ida of iM1la ConaocVPurcMso Order Thn only terms.ndcandihoesthat Will be applicable to the Intarpmted¢n of this Contmstar¢those lesuotl by the CITY OF NEWPORT BELCH city of Newport Beach, IMP 0 R T A N T GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONSION THE REVERSE SIDE ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN. The Antcles covered by Pro Purchase Order or Contract must contain to applicable Cal-OSHA Standards,andfor other appropnam laws,regulations,rules,and code of Fedcrel Covsmmom and faro Slate of California.Show as a separate Item any retell sales tax,use tax or Federal tax applicable to this purchase.This order subject to California sales tax.All OUT-OF-STATE VENDORS:the CITY will pay any anbsluae tax on all purchanos shipped from ouW l-stoto.All purchases and lmncportation charges are exempt ham Federal exciso tax.NOTE:All purchases are F.O.B destination unless othemi-o euthodzed Charges for fh'pments,to to be IrNyht prepaid and added to the Invoice(shown as a separate Item)whore-u authorized.Do not Include Federal transportation tax,A Newport Basch business leaders May be required to conduct bu^Ines in tare Cit . ORIGINATOR'S/DEPARTMENTAL COPY PURCHASE CIWOF REQUISITION "EWPORT BEACH G4 ,} uaoaa P.O.No.: Date: April 14, 1995 (if Reserved) Dept: PLANNING Suggested Vendor: Ship To: ROBERT XAHN, JOHN I%IN & Associates, _Inc., _ Planning Department,, Transportation Planning Attn: Aziz Aslami 4101 Birch Stteet, Suite 100 , __; _ Newport Beach CA 92660 Attention: Phone No: Quantity Description of Articles or services Required UnitPrice Amount I tddgei* 1 Traffic Impact Study re. Avis Onick Turn—Around Facilit 4201 Birch St. (TSA 105), Comments: Sub Total Funds deposited into sect. 010, 2300 4-14-95 Tat Total Date Required: F.O.B. Terms, Code Amount f RO (Department Heid or person autho execute,requlsltions) C13A$ G MANAGER FINANCE DIRECTOR(Approval required for purchases exceeding$2,'000) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Wpo�T PA YMENT A UTHORIZA TION �y Demand oh _ Robert H Lee & Associates U T cq��FoaN�P Address: 1137 N. McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, CA 94954 Date: May 3, 1995 Amount: 3278.00 Item of Ex enditure Involce No. Budget No. Amount Duplicate deposit for Environmental Documentation 010 5000 $278.00 for AVIS Quick Turn Around Facility 4201 Birch St. ; UP 3557, Traffic Study 105 NOTE: PLEASE RETURN CHECK TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT (-7� / TOTAL 0 Description/Special Instructions: Department Approval: Date: 3 •Acctg, Mgr. Approval: Date: Fin. Dir. Approval: Date: ag�v�Rp CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CASH RECEIPT a� a NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92663 C+crroaN' 5E509 RECEIVED PY: KW CUSTOMER: ROBERT H. LEE ASSOC ZONING & SUBDIVISION FEES4201 BIR'C:H ST/AVIS 010-5000 $278. 00 TRAFFIC_ STUDIES 010--1300 $3, 990. 00 ENVIRONMENTAL FEES 010-5010 $399. 00 COUNTY FILING FEES/PLANNI 010-2243 $50. 00 TOTAL DUE $4,717.00 CASH PAID CHECK PAID CHECK NO TENDERED CHANGE $. 00 $4,717. 00 15792 $4, 717.00 $.00 DATE - 04/17/95 TIME - 12: 39: 38 (r r. �dE`v°°Rr CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CASH RECEIPT z NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92663 �7</FOR�r 57a_4t PE*VED BY: KW C:USTOMER:ROBERT H LEE ASSOC: 20 Nv &< SUBDIVISION FEES4201 BIFC:H ST 010-5000 $1 ,412.00 TOTAL DUE $1 ,41'-2. 00 CASH PAID CHECK PAID CHECK NO TENDEPED C.HANVE $. 00 $1,412.00 15868 $1 , 412. 00 $. 00 DATE — 05/01/95 TIME — 14: 41: 58 • i! SEW PORT • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH U z P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 9265&8915 PLANNING DEPARTMENT(714) 644-3225 April 13, 1995 Mr. Gary M. Semling 1137 No. McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, CA 94954-1110 Subject: AVIS Ouick Turnaround Facility Traffic Study, 4201 Birch Street Newport Beach (TPO# 105) Dear Mr. Semling: Enclosed please find a copy of a proposal submitted by Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Transportation Planning regarding a traffic study required for traffic phasing analysis for the proposed AVIS Turnaround Rental Car Facility at 4201 Birch Street in Newport Beach. The proposal contains an outline of the required work, schedule of time, and estimated fee required for preparation of the task. • The requested Traffic Consultant fees have been reviewed by the City and are considered appropriate and warranted. The fees are as follows. Consultant Fees $3,990 City Fees(10%) $ 399 Negative Declaration $ 278 Orange County Fee $ 50 Total Request: $4,717 Please submit a check in the amount of$4,717 payable to the City of Newport Beach. Your prompt response in this matter is appreciated. Very truly yours, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER,Director BY Ifs Aziz M. Aslami Associate Planner F:\WP51\..AAziz-a\Tralrc\TS 105\cost 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach 0W PO RT °� �0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 C`'14 FO R PLANNING DEPARTMENT(714)644-3225 April 10, 1995 Mr. Robert Kahn RKJK Traffic Engineers 4101 Birch Street Suite# 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Subject: AVIS Quick Turnaround Facility Traffic Phasing Ordinance Study for 4201 Birch Street,Newport Beach (TPO# 105) Dear Mr.Kahn: The City of Newport Beach Planning Department has received an application for an automobile rental, storage and service facility on a site that is located at 4201 Birch Street in the City of Newport Beach. • The proposed auto storagelservice facility would require a TRAFFIC STUDY to determine the impact of the subject proposal on the City's Traffic Circulation System. The City invites you to submit a proposal to prepare a Traffic Phasing Ordinance Study for this project. If you are interested, at your earliest convenience, please submit a proposal to the City including project tasks, budget, and timing. A copy of the site plan has been included for your information and use. For traffic data or technical questions please contact, Rich Edmonston, the City's Traffic Engineer at (714) 644-3344. Should you have any other question or more information regarding this project, please contact me. Very truly yours, PLANNING DIRECTOR JAMES D.BEWICKER,DIRECTOR By A {►+ti. Aziz N1. Aslami Associate Planner F:\WP51V..\Aziz-A\Traffic\tsl05pro 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach APR-12-1995 09:42 RKJK 4^40902 P.02 Robert Kahn , Jahn Kain . & Associates, Inc. Transportation Planning • Traffic/Acoustical Engineering April 12, 1995 Mr. Aziz Aslam) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658 Subject: Avis Quick Turn-Around Facility Traffic impact Study Dear Mr. Asiami: INTRODUCTION The firm of ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. (RKJK) is pleased to submit this proposed Agreement to provide a traffic impact study for the proposed • Avis Quick Turn-Around Facility. The proposed project is located between Campus Drive and Birch Street north of Dove Street in the City of Newport Beach. The proposed Avis Quick Turn-Around Facility is a support facility for Avis Rental Fleet at John Wayne Airport. Rental cars will be brought to the site by employees for refueling, cleaning and vacuuming, and then returned by employees to the Airport. Hours of operation will be 5:00 AM to 12 midnight, and no customers will be served at the site. It is estimated that conservatively that 310 vehicles will enter and exit the site per day. Allowing for cars in transit and staging, it is anticipated that 265 cars would be on-site at any one time. The site will have 40 employees, which will park off-site at the Avis Administrative Facility located at 848 Dove Street and will be shuttled to the site in rental cars. The site will have one entrance point from Birch Street and one exit point onto Campus Drive. SCQPE OF WORK The following Scope of Work is proposed by RKJK for this study effort: 1. Discuss the project with City of Newport Beach staff. 2. Confirm the methodology and traffic study. • 4101 Birch Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, California 92660 (714) 474-0809 • FAX(714) 474-0902 APR-12-1995 09:42 RKJK 4940902 P.03 Mr. Aziz Aslami CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH April 12, 1995 Page 2 3. Based upon the City traffic phasing ordinance and City approved trip generation rates, calculate the project's peak hour and daily trip generation. Existing peak hour traffic counts will be obtained from the City documents. 4. Determine the project's trip distribution and traffic assignment to the adjoining roadway system, 5. Conduct 1 % analysis for up to four (4) study area intersections as designated by the City. 6. Determine traffic volumes and level of service at up to four (4) study area intersections for cumulative conditions with the project. 7. Identify any required traffic mitigation measures at study area intersections. 8. Prepare traffic impact report. PROFESSIONAL FEES The fee for the work outlined in this proposal is based upon personnel charges plus direct expenses as indicated in the attached Exhibit A. The fixed fee to accomplish the above Scope of Work is $3,990.00. Three copies (two bound and one original for the client's use) of the project report would be prepared. Monthly billings from RKJK will be based upon the attached Exhibit A - BILLING RATES FOR ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.. The proposed fee does not include attendance at public hearings/meetings,which may be required to secure approval of the project. If these are required and requested, RKJK would be happy to attend these meetings and billing would be based upon the billing rates included in Exhibit A. The Client agrees to limit the Design Professional's liability to the Client and to all construction Contractors and Subcontractors on the project, due to the Design Professional's negligent acts, errors, or omissions, such that the total aggregate liability of the Design Professional to all those named shall not exceed $50,000 or the Design Professional's total fee for services rendered on this project, whichever is greater. APR-12-1995 09:43 •JK 4740902 P.04 iMr. Aziz Aslami CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH April 12, 1995 Page 3 In the event that a lawsuit is brought for the enforcement of any of the terms of this agreement, the prevailing party should be entitled to attorney fees and costs in addition to any damages. TIME SCHEDULE It is estimated that the Avis Quick Turn-Around Facility study will take approximately 10 working days to complete from the date of authorization, and date of receipt of data essential for the study. Additionally, any delays resulting from circumstances beyond our control, such as weather, shall extend the time schedule. If the City desires a faster turnaround time and the information is available, RKJK would be happy to accelerate the timing for the study. Q ►nl EKATIQNS • RKJK is located in Newport Beach, California and specializes in transportation planning and traffic/acoustical engineering for governmental agencies and the business community. The firm principals and associates have over 100 years of combined engineering and planning experience throughout Southern California at the regional, local and individual project levels. The experience of the firm's personnel in transportation planning and traffic/acoustical engineering provides the special skills necessary for determining practical and meaningful traffic solutions. Resumes of key personnel within the firm are attached. This letter can serve as a Memorandum of Agreement and our authorization to proceed. Please sign one copy and return it to us for our files. We are looking forward to serving you on this project. This proposal is valid for sixty days, if signed by the client. if you have any questions regarding this proposal, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (714) 474-0809. Respectfully submitted, ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert Kahn, P.E. • Principal APR-12-1995 09:43 RKJK 4740902 P.06 • EXHIBIT A BILLING RATES FOR ROBERT KAHN HN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Compensation for Services The Consultants Billing rates for services are as follows: Position Hourl R ntp Principal $110.00 Senior Associate $ 80.00 $ 8 .00 Associate Senior Engineer/Planner $ 70.00 Engineer/Planner $ 50.00 Assistant Engineer/Planner $ 50.00 Engineering Technician IV $ 45.00 Engineering Technician III $ 35.00 Engineering Technician II $ 25.00 .00 Engineering Technician 1 $ 3 • 00 Administrative Assistant $ MOO $ Administrative Aide $ 25.00 00 Clerical Aide General l (1) Reimbursable direct costs, such as reproduction, supplies, messenger se vice,perc Itng-di stance telephone calls, travel and traffic counts will be billed at cost p sten (2) Hourly rates apply to work time, travel time and time spent at public hearings and meetings. For overtime work and public meetings, the above rates may be increased 50 percent. (3) Client payment for professional services is not contingent upon the client receiving payment from I other parties. Ill (4) Billing statements for work will be submitted monthly. Statements are payable within thirty (30) days of the receipt by client of statement. Any statement unpaid after thirty (30) days shall be subject to interest at the maximum permitted by law. January 1, 1992 I I F2obert Kahn, John Kain do Associotes, Inc. TOTA! P,C,;- Q atiW PORT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH V z P.O. BOX 1768,NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 Po PLANNING DEPARTMENT(714) 644-3225 September 7, 1995 Mr. Gary M. Semling Robert H. Lee&Associates 1137 No. McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, CA94954-1110 Subject: AVIS Ouick Turnaround Facility Traffic Studv. 4201 Birch Street Newport Beach(TPO# 1051 Dear Mr. Semling: Enclosed, please find Check No. 226344 from The City of Newport Beach in the amount of$114.00, made payable to Robert H. Lee & Associates. After payments to Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates for the traffic study services and the environmental documentation charges related to the subject project,the account remained with a balance of$114 which is herewith refunded to your firm. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at(714)644-3236. Very truly yours, By AzizNf Aslanv Associate Planner enclosure F:\WP51\...Wziz-a\Traffic\TS I05\refund 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach AVIS QUICK TURNAROUND FACILITY TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE ANALYSIS Newport Beach, California yl OTC Ll I i �a I ..s BIRCH STREET j Robert Kahn,=JohnKain)j& Associat Robert Kahn , John Kain & Associates, Inc. 1 Transportation Planning • Traffic/Acoustical Engineering ' June 2, 1995 Mr. Aziz M. Aslami Planning Department ' CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 ' Subject: Avis Quick Turnaround Facility Traffic Phasing Ordinance Analysis ' Dear Mr. Aslami: ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. is pleased to submit the Avis Quick Turnaround Facility Traffic Phasing Ordinance Analysis. This report provides a summary of the findings, analysis procedures and evaluation of the proposed project, for peak period and peak hour conditions, including site access, and on-site circulation pursuant to CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH requirements. ' Based upon this review, the project can be accommodated within the planned circulation system, without off-site improvements. In addition, the site access and on-site circulation are adequate for the project site. ' If you have any questions regarding this study, please do not hesitate to call at (714) 474-0809. ' Sincerely, ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN Cl TES, INC. QPOFESS/pNq 1 � Q y Robert Kahn, P.E. Lee Royalt P.E. ¢ N0 0555 , Principal EXP.12/31197 Associate RK:LR:kgd/4984 sj4TFTq CAV am; ' JN:559-95-001 ' 4101 Birch Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, California 92660 (714) 474-0809 • FAX (714) 474-0902 "IS QUICK TURNAROUND FACILITY TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE ANALYSIS NEWPORT BEACH 1 ' Prepared for: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Prepared by: 1 ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4101 Birch Street, Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 ' Robert Kahn, P.E. Lee Royalty, P.E. June 2, 1995 JN:559-95-001 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ' II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 ' III. TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 A. Project Trip Generation B. Project Trip Distribution IV. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 A. Traffic Phasing Ordinance Committed Projects B. Regional Traffic Growth C. Study Intersections D. Determination of Impacted Intersections ' V. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 ' VI. SITE ACCESS AND ON-SITE ISSUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 A. Site Access ' B. On-Site Circulation C. Summary APPENDICES ONE PERCENT VOLUME ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A ICU WORKSHEETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B 1 1 ' LIST OF EXHIBITS ' EXHIBIT PAGE A LOCATION MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ' B SITE PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 ' C INBOUND PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 D OUTBOUND PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 E STUDY INTERSECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 ' LIST OF TABLES ' TABLE PAGE 1 TRIP GENERATION RATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 ' 3 COMMITTED PROJECTS LIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4 REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANNUAL GROWTH RATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 ' 5 ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 t6 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . 21 i ' "IS QUICK TURNAROUND FACILITY ' TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE ANALYSIS NEWPORT BEACH ' INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ' This report presents the traffic impact analysis for the proposed Avis Quick ' Turnaround Facility (QTA) located on Birch Street in the City of Newport Beach. As required in Newport Beach for all new development projects exceeding 10,000 square ' feet or generating greater than 130 daily vehicle trips, the traffic analysis conforms to the Traffic Phasing Ordinance analysis procedures specified by the City. iThe Traffic Phasing Ordinance study format requires that project traffic impacts be ipresented in progressive analysis steps. Following a description of the project location and site plan, the trip generation and distribution for the proposed project are ipresented. Traffic impacts at intersections are then determined for AM and PM 2 1/2 hour peak periods and AM and PM peak hours. ' The traffic analysis is conducted at a time frame one year after the proposed icompletion of the project. This time frame is selected because traffic from the project is assumed to have reached a stabilized flow condition that is typical of project traffic iconditions. Traffic from other projects, which have been previously approved by the City of Newport Beach (committed projects) but which are not completed or currently ' generating traffic, is included in the analysis. Information on committed projects and their traffic is furnished by the City. Arterial roadways in the City which carry a iregional traffic component are also identified by the City. Because the traffic volume which represents the regional traffic component increases without regard to the iapproval of projects within the city, the regional traffic growth component must be ' 1 r accounted for separately. As with committed project traffic, the yearly regional r growth rate for each roadway is specified by the City. With the completion of this project contemplated in the Fall of 1995, assuming approval by the City, the analysis ' year for this project has been assumed to be 1996., Project traffic is then combined with existing, committed project and regional growth ' traffic to simulate traffic conditions during the analysis year. Project traffic volumes ' are first subjected to a one-percent test at study intersection locations. Project traffic on each intersection approach during an AM and PM two and one-half hour period is r compared to one percent of the traffic projected to exist in the analysis year without the project. If the project traffic volume is greater than or equal to.one percent of the r intersection approach volume, further analysis must be completed at this intersection location during the peak hour. r Intersection analysis duringthe peak hour is performed using the Intersection Capacity ' Utilization (ICU) methodology. The ICU methodology expresses intersection performance in terms of the degree of capacity utilization for critical lane groups of r the intersection. An intersection which is operating with an ICU of 1.00 is said to be operating at capacity. The Traffic Phasing Ordinance requires that intersections r operate at an ICU of 0.90 or less during AM and PM peak hours. If the ICU with project traffic is projected to exceed 0.90, a. mitigation improvement must be ' proposed which will cause the ICU during that time period to be reduced to at an acceptable level. For the purposes of the analysis, the incremental increase in ' intersection capacity due to the improvement must be limited to 70 percent of it's value to insure some reserve capacity. r In addition to the intersection analysis, the report provides a review of on-site traffic ' circulation, and site access from the adjoining street system. i 1 r 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site, located at the corner of Birch Street and Dove Street in the John ' Wayne Airport area of Newport Beach, is proposed for development as a quick turnaround (QTA) service facility for the Avis rental car fleet assigned to the airport. ' This type of facility provides light maintenance which is limited to fueling, washing and vacuuming, and "top-off" replacement of consumable fluids such as windshield ' washing liquid and motor oil. Facilities for full lubrication and mechanical repair (such as brake replacement) will not be provided at the QTA Facility but will be utilized at ' the proposed Avis Administrative Facility located at 848 Dove Street, approximately one-half mile away. The site location with respect to the surrounding area is shown ' in Exhibit A. ' Because the customer service area for pickup/drop-off of rental vehicles at the airport is limited to approximately 75 parking spaces, vehicles will be shuttled to the QTA ' Facility from the airport and returned by AVIS employees as rental demand at the airport dictates; the QTA site will not be open to AVIS rental customers. In addition, ' the 40 AVIS employees working at the QTA Facility will not be permitted to park their own vehicles at the site. Employees will report for work to the Administrative Facility ' and will be shuttled to their work locations in shuttle vans or rental vehicles that are in transit from the airport. Vehicles that are scheduled for oil change or brake service ' will be shuttled directly to the Administrative Facility from the airport. After receiving this heavier maintenance, they will then be shuttled to the QTA Facility for final cleaning service. It is estimated that approximately 10 percent of the daily QTA vehicle volume will pass through the Administrative Facility for heavier maintenance. ' The service facilities will operate from 5:00 AM to 12:00 midnight. It is estimated by ' AVIS that a total of 310 vehicles per day will be serviced at the QTA Facility and that ' 3 LOCATION MAP .... .. ..... ....... ... .......... . ....... .. ............ . .......... .......... . .. ...... .. . ...... :'-*-'-AIRPORT"-'- ............ ......... ......................... ...... ...... ................. .... .......... PO v .......... .......... A SITE OLD 0 BOWSPRIT eRi DR. TRATIVE FACUTY AVIS OTA FACILITY TRAFFIC STUDY �0_grt Newport Beach, California EXHIBIT A Robert Kahn, John Kain 4 do Associates, Inc. a maximum of 85 percent of the vehicles (265 cars) may be at the QTA site at any ' one time. ' The site plan for the proposed QTA Facility is shown in Exhibit B. The "L" shaped parcel will be surrounded by a six foot high concrete block wall to provide security ' and control access. Entry to the site will be via a single one-way entrance from Dove Street using an existing curb cut and driveway approach approximately 260 feet west ' of Birch Street. The entrance will be controlled by a non-motorized traffic controller. An emergency-only access through a chain-link gate will be provided from Birch Street ' approximately 160 feet north of Dove Street. Exit from the site will be through a single one-way, guard-attended gate to Campus Drive approximately 160 feet north ' of Dove Street. The exit gate will utilize a motorized gate arm. ' The service area will be located approximately in the center of the parcel, midway between Birch Street and Campus Drive. Fueling of vehicles and cleaning of their ' interiors will occur at eight servicing stations under a canopied island. A small office structure with employee restrooms and lockers and a carwash bay is situated just ' west of the service island. A pre-service queing/parking area is located between the entrance and the service island, and a post-service queing/parking area is located between the carwash and the exit gate. t5 SITE PLAN 1 1 v� � � 1 o ' � e 1 / AVIS QTA FACILITY TRAFFIC STUDY 1 ort Newport Beach, California 1 EXHIBIT B 6 Robert Kahn, John Kam 1 & Associates, Inc. 1 ' TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION ' This section of the report discusses project trip generation and trip distribution. Trip ' generation rates which are appropriate for the project are identified and the resulting trip generation is determined. The distribution patterns that project trips will then use ' for routing through the roadway network are identified and depicted graphically. ' Project Trio Generation The trip generation rates selected for the proposed site use are shown in Table 1. These rates are designated by the City of Newport Beach Traffic Engineering ' Department for a satellite rental car facility and are based on survey data of similar facilities in the airport area. ' The peak hour trip generation rates shown in Table 1 define the trip generation for the ' project during one-hour AM and PM time periods. Peak hour trip generation is used to assess the project's traffic impacts using the Intersection Capacity Utilization ' methodology as required by the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. However, before the ICU calculations are performed, determination of impact to an intersection is first assessed ' through a One Percent Test. The One Percent Test reviews traffic flows during a two and one-half hour time period both in the morning and evening peak periods. Project ' trip generation during the two and one-half hour time periods is assumed to be equivalent to twice the one-hour trip generation values. Trip generation for the project is shown in Table 2 and is based on the maximum ' number of vehicles expected to be parked at the site at any one time. For the 265 maximum parking spaces, the project will generate 61 trips in the AM peak hour (34 7 TABLE 1 , TRIP GENERATION RATES' PEAK-HOUR , AM PM ' LAND USE UNITS IN OUT IN OUT DAILY Satellite Rental SPACE 0.13 0.10 t 0.13 0.12 2.32 Car Facility ' Source: City of Newport Beach, based on survey of similar facilities in John Wayne Airport area by Austin-Foust Associates, Inc., October 1991. ' Y SPACE = on-site storage parking space 8 ' ' TABLE 2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION PEAK-HOUR ' AM PM LAND USE QUANTITY UNITS' IN OUT IN OUT DAILY Satellite Car 265 SPACE 34 27 34 32 615 ' Rental Facility 1 ' SPACE = on-site storage parking space 9 inbound/27 outbound), 64 trips In the PM peak hour (34 inbound/32 outbound) and ' 615 trips daily. Project Trip Distribution ' The trip distribution for the site is shown in Exhibit C (inbound) and Exhibit D ' (outbound). The variation between inbound and outbound routes for the QTA Facility reflects the difference in rental vehicle shuttle travel patterns to and from the airport ' based on whether the vehicle needs light or heavy maintenance. All vehicles return to the airport from the QTA Facility, but not all vehicles reach the QTA Facility from ' the airport. The inbound trip distribution reflects the shuttling of vehicles from the airport to both ' the QTA Facility where light service is done, and the Administrative Facility where , heavier service is done. Most of the vehicles leaving the airport (90 percent) travel directly to the QTA Facility; the remainder (10 percent) travel directly to the Administrative Facility but make their way to the QTA Facility later the same day. , The outbound trip distribution reflects the shuttling of all vehicles to the airport , directly from the QTA Facility. I 10 , 1 INBOUND PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION 1 1 1 JOHN tea. 1 "'••WAYNE .•.:•:• ' m• Mipyes AIRPORT P. 1 v �029 4,��\ .•. 100 CITA SITE' ,_ �cS ST R 90 Al i y A 1 10 1 \ 10 w 1 T T � 1 S° <°t�,"�,,,n BOWSPRIT DR. ST ADMINISTRATIVE 1 LEGEND: °� s, FACILITY 90 = PERCENT PROJECT TRAFFIC 1 ' AVIS QTA FACILITY TRAFFIC STUDY 0 1 tr# Newport Beach, California EXHIBIT C 1 ii Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Inc. 1 OUTBOUND PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION ........ ..... ........ ..... .... ... ..... ......WAYN E .... :::AIRPORT ...................... ....... ......... . .. P 0..... luo CITA SITE 0 BOWSPRIT DR. STRATIVE LEGEND: FACILITY = PERCENT PROJECT TWMC AVIS OTA FACILITY TRAFFIC STUDY opt Newport Beach, California EXHIBIT D 12 Robert Kahn, John Kain. Associates. Inc. ' TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ' This section of the report discusses the impact of project traffic determined in the ' previous report section. Project impacts are assessed one year after the project is estimated for completion so that the project traffic has the opportunity to stabilize at ' its projected value. Because the overall level of traffic which will occur at that time is made up of different components, each traffic component is estimated separately ' and then combined to forecast the total level of traffic at each study intersection. ' Traffic Phasing Ordinance Committed Projects ' One of the components of future traffic is committed projects traffic. Committed projects are projects which have been approved by the City of Newport Beach under ' the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. Because these projects are potentially under construction or are in their one-year maturity period, they are either not currently or ' are only partially generating traffic. As such, their traffic impacts are not reflected in the peak hour intersection traffic counts provided by the City. ' To account for this traffic component, the City maintains a database which tracks the ' committed projects traffic at each City intersection. The City then provides this committed projects traffic for the analysis year of the proposed project to the traffic ' consultant preparing the report. The projects comprising the committed projects list, along with their degree of occupancy are listed in Table 3. The committed projects ' traffic volume is tabulated separately on each analysis worksheet. ' 13 � 1 TABLE,3 ' COMMITTED PROJECTS LIST PROJECT PERCENT OF ' NUMBER PROJECT NAME OCCUPANCY DOS Civic Plaza 96%Occupancy ' 010 Corporate Plaza 30%Occupancy 018 Newport Place 96%Occupancy 031 Valdez 40%Occupancy ' 033 Koll Center Npt'No. 1 TPP 00%Occupancy 634 See Projects 340 to 343 00y6 Occupancy 053 See Projects 530 to 533 00%Occupancy ' 080 1400 Dove Street 80%Occupancy 063 Koll Center TPP Amend.4A 00%occupancy ' 085 Rosan's Development 85%Occupancy _ lop Fashion1sland #2 00%Occupancy 111 28th St.Marina Project 50%Occupancy , 120 Paclfio Bell Site 00%Occupancy 121 Newport Village 00%Occupancy 122 Castaways Marina 00%Occupancy ' 123 Koli Center Carl's Jr. 98%Occupancy 124 Civic Plaza 00% Occupancy 125 1 Corporate Plaza&West 00%Occupancy 129 Hoag Hospital Extension 00%Occupancy , 130 Corporate Plaza West II 00%Occupancy _134 Interpretive Center _ 00%Occupancy ' 135 PaciRa Mutual 1801 Avoca 00% Occupancy 135 Newport Diagnostic/85 OQ%Occupancy 00%Occupancy 139 Pao Tel Mint Stores g ' 140 Four Seasons Addition OQ%Occupancy 141 Family Fitness Center 00%Occupancy 341 Amendment No.1 Ford Aero 00% Occupancy , 342 Amendment No. 1 Ford Aero 00%Occupancy 343 Amendment No. 1 Ford Aero 00%Occupancy , 555 CIOSA-Irvine Project 00%Occupancy 910 Newport,Dunes 00%Occupancy 920 Bayview 00%Occupancy , 930 City of Irvine Dev. 00%Occupancy 14 ' Regional Traffic Growth Another component of future traffic which must be determined for the traffic analysis is the amount of traffic which occurs due to regional growth. The regional traffic component represents traffic which essentially passes through the city on roadways ' within the City of Newport Beach. ' This traffic component maintains a growth trend which is not related to project approvals by the City of Newport Beach. The amount of annual growth is identified t by the City for segments of roadways which carry regional traffic and is expressed as a percentage of the total traffic which was counted. The regional growth amounts ' are shown in Table 4. Study Intersections Because the Traffic Phasing Ordinance focuses on the impacts to intersections during peak periods, the study intersections define the specific analysis locations within the tcity circulation system. The four intersections which are analyzed for this report are shown on Exhibit E. These intersections have been designated by the City Traffic ' Engineer and are: 1. Birch Street and Dove Street 2. Birch Street and Quail Street ' 3. Campus Drive and Airport Way 4. Campus Drive and Dove Street 1 15 TABLE 4 REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANNUAL GROWTH RATES' PERCENT ' ROADWAY SEGMENT ANNUAL GROWTH COAST HIGHWAY East city limit to MacArthur Boulevard 2 MacArthur Boulevard to Jamboree Road 2 , Jamboree Road to;Newport Boulevard 2 Newport Boulevard to west city limit 4 IRVINE AVENUE ' All 2 JAMBOREE ROAD ' Coast Highway to San Joaquin Hills-Road 3 San Joaquin Hills Road to Bison 2 Bison to Bristol 1 Bristol to Campus 1 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD Coast Highway to San Joaquin Hills Road 6 San Joaquin-Hills Road to north city limit 3 ' NEWPORT BOULEVARD Coast.Highway to north city limit 1 , Street segments not listed are assumed to have 0% regional growth. 16 STUDY INTERSECTIONS i 1 •.JOHN . .. 1 �o .•.•WAYNE• ....:.• ov Mir FS :.. AIRPORT: 1 . ' P ui cgMo G CITA SITE T A v s 1 1 T S 00 P� T � 1 S° BOWSPRIT LEGEND: O< FASTRAYnVE 1 = STUDY INTERSECTION ST 1 AVIS OTA FACILITY TRAFFIC STUDY 1 °rt Newport Beach, California EXHIBIT E 1 17 Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Inc. 1 Determination of Impacted Intersections ' The first assessment of. ,the project's traffic is made to determine if the project significantly impacts an intersection. This is accomplished by analyzing Intersection ' leg approach volumes at study intersections during the AM and PM two and one-half hour peak traffic periods. This assessment is referred to as the "One Percent Test". ' During these peak periods; the total traffic volume, estimated to occur In the traffic , analysis year, on each leg of each study intersection is determined. The project's traffic contribution to the intersection leg Is also identified and is compared to the total non-project traffic volume. if the project's contribution on each leg is less than one -percent of the non-project total, the analysis for that intersection for that time ' period is concluded and no further analysis is required. However, if the one percent threshold is equaled or exceeded, the intersection Is said to be impacted by the project, and a peak hour analysis for that time period must be performed to determine the level of capacity utilization at the intersection. ' The results of the One Percent Test are shown in Table 5. Analysis worksheets for each intersection are included in Appendix "A". The results of the analysis Indicate that project volumes will exceed the one percent threshold at all intersections for both AM and PM peak periods except for the intersection of Birch Street/Dove Street in the PM peak hour. All,intersections will require further analysis during peak hours except for the one intersection noted in the PM peak hour. 18 ' ATABLE 5 ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY ' PROJECT VOLUME GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO ONE PERCENT OF 2.5 HOUR PROJECTED VOLUME INTERSECTION AM PM Birch St./Dove St. Yes No Birch St./Quail St. Yes Yes ' Campus Dr./Airport Wy. Yes Yes Campus Dr./Dove St. Yes Yes 1 t ' 19 ICI INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS C C This section of the report presents the peak hour intersection analysis for the 1 Intersections which exceeded the one percent threshold. The Intersection Capacity 1 Utilization (ICU) methodology is utilized for this analysis as required by the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. 1 The ICU methodology expresses intersection performance in terms of the degree of capacity utilization for critical lane groups of an Intersection. Capacity utilization is ' P Y 9 p expressed as a volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio in decimal percent for each approach 1 lane group. Critical lane groups, whose movements conflict with each other (i.e., must move independently under the control of a unique signal phase) and have the 1 highest V/C ratios, are then Identified. The sum of V/C ratios for the critical lane groups constitutes the ICU value for the intersection. ICU calculations assume a lane 1 capacity value of 1600 vehicles per hour of green time for both through and turn lanes and do not include a factor for yellow clearance time. ICU calculations are presented 1 rounded to two decimal places. To operate an acceptable level of service, the Traffic Phasing Ordinance generally requires the ICU value for an intersection to be less than 0.90 with the contribution 1 of project traffic. In situations where the ICU will exceed 0.90, the project must propose an improvement which will restore an acceptable level of service. 1 The results of the ICU calculations for the study Intersections are presented in Table 1 6. The ICU worksheets are included In Appendix "B". As shown in Table 6, the ICU for all Intersections In the analysis year with project traffic will not exceed 0.90. Consequently, no further ICU analysis is required for this project. 1 20 1 . i ' TABLE 6 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION SUMMARY INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' ICU2 ' NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- WITHOUT WITH BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND PROJECT PROJECT INTERSECTION L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM 'PM Airport Wy. INS)at: • Campus Dr. (EW) 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 3 0 0.44 0.58 0.45 0.61 ' Campus Dr.INS) at: • Dove St.(EW) 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 1 O 0 1 0 0.55 0.67 0.56 0.67 Birch St. INS)at: • Dove St, 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0.49 0.58 0.49 0.58 ' • Quail St. 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0.54 0.83 0.54 0.83 1 1 When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. ' L = Left;T = Through; R = Right 2 Intersection Capacity Utilization in Year 1995 with regional growth and committed projects traffic. ' 21 SITE ACCESS AND ON-SITE ISSUES , This section of the report presents a discussion of issues related to vehicle movement ' at the site including site access and on-site circulation. Site Access ' As shown on the site plan (Exhibit B), the project parcel spans almost the entire end of the block on Dove Street between Birch Street and Campus Drive. Access to the site will be from a single, mid-block, one-way only entrance from Dove Street and a ' single one-way only exit to Campus Drive. There will be no significant problems related to site access. Vehicles will enter the site from a low-volume street with a painted median through a driveway incorporating ' a non-motorized traffic controller which is set 20 feet back from the inner edge of the sidewalk. ' Vehicles entering the site from eastbound Dove Street will turn from the median and , will not interfere with left-turning traffic at the intersection of Birch Street/Dove Street. Vehicles entering the site from westbound Dove Street will turn from the single westbound lane well past the intersection. The opening of the entrance with the non-motorized traffic controller is approximately 12 feet wide and is channeled by ' the perimeter concrete block wall. The entrance would be improved if the block wall on the right side of the entrance is angled at a 45 degree slant to reduce conflicts ' with right-turning traffic. Vehicles will exit the site through a gate with motorized arm. The driveway length past the gate is approximately 15 feet and would be Improved if the gate was moved ' 22 ' back to provide a driveway length of at least 20 feet behind the sidewalk. This would ' allow the exiting vehicles to clear the gate and stop behind the sidewalk before entering the flow of traffic on Campus Drive. The perimeter block wall is set back far ' enough from the street that sight distance is not impaired. ' An emergency-only access is provided through a chain link gate on Birch Street. This access should not be used for normal site ingress/egress because of turning conflicts ' with the southbound left turn pocket at the intersection of Birch Street/Dove Street. ' On-Site Circulation ' Circulation within the site should be adequate for the use proposed. Vehicles will essentially flow in a one-way movement through the site as they are processed. They III ' are parked in the staging area leading to the service islands prior to servicing and in the storage area past the car wash after servicing. ' Vehicles will be moved only by Avis employees which will permit bumper-to-bumper I'I ' parking and fairly narrow parking lanes. Access lanes which must be kept open for emergency response purposes should be clearly marked with painted designations and should be at least 15 feet wide. It should be noted that a portion of the site along the north wall (but outside the service area) will be reserved as an easement for an exit lane from the parking area ' of the existing building to the north. The existing parking stalls in this area will be removed and will no longer be available for the employees and patrons of the retail ' establishments in the building. The adequacy of parking at the adjacent building should be reviewed and is beyond the scope of this study. ' 23 Summary , The proposed Avis Quick Turnaround Facility in Newport Beach is a service facility to ' provide light maintenance and cleaning of rental vehicles in the rental fleet at John Wayne Airport. The project is located at the intersection of Birch Street and Dove Street adjacent to the airport. , The site will contain a maximum of 265 vehicles at any one time and will generate 61 A.M. peak hour trips, 64 P.M. peak hour trips and 615 daily trips. During the two and one-half hour peak A.M. and P.M. periods all study area intersections are impacted by ' project traffic with a project impact of greater than one percent except for the intersection of Birch Street/Dove Street in the P.M. peak hour. All study intersections ' will operate with an acceptable level of service (Intersection Capacity Utilization of below 0.90) for both A.M. and P.M. peak hours. ' Site access and on-site circulation are generally adequate as proposed. Minor ' improvements are recommended to the entrance and exit gates to improve turn movements and queuing. Emergency response travel lanes within the site should be ' clearly striped so that vehicles are not parked in those areas. 24 ' ' APPENDIX A ' ONE PERCENT VOLUME ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 1 1 ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection BIRCH/DOVE (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Xverage Winter/Spring 19 92 _ ' Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour ' Volume Volume Volume Volume volume Volume 11453 Northbound 0 28 ' Southbound 916 Eastbound 527 0 0 527 5i 0 ' Westbound 3 i 272 0 16 288 7 ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume ' ® Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ' (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 DATE: PROJECT: MOM T 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' .I Intersection BIRCH/DOVE , (Existing Traffic Volumes based on AVerage winter/Spring 19tLz _ Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hou Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' I Northbound 1073 0 12 1085 11 0 Southbound 2099 0 12 2111 21 t 0 FEastb 324 0 4 32& 3 i 0 1120 0 52 1172 12 I 7 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected , ® Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ' Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. t 1 DATE: PROJECT: cnDM T 1 ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection QUAIL/BIRCH (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Average Winter/Spring 19s2 p M ' Peak 215 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' I Northbound 2201 0 34 2235 22 0 Southbound 719 0 66 785 8 0 Eastbound 325 1 0 0 1 325 3 i 7 ' Westbound 246 0 10 256 3 0 ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2)1 Hour Traffic Volume ' ® Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. I DATE: ' PROJECT: FnRM T 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection QUAIL/BIRCH (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average nter pr ng _ M , Peak 2y Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Protect Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peek 2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume I Volume Northbound 1054 0 12 1066 11 ! Southbound 0 I Eastbound 266 0 L 0 t Westbound 847 0 1-0 857 9 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ' Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume ® Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ' Peak 21� Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: ' Fnani t I ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection CAMPUS DRIVE/AIRPORT WAY ' (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 95) AM ' Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1X of Projected Project Direction Peak 211 Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 211 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound —0— 0 0 0 0 ' I ' Southbound 440 0 16 456 5 i 68 Eastbound 2750 0 46 2796 28 i 54 ' Westbound 1210 p 6 1216 12 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2P2 Hour Traffic Volume ' ® Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 ' NOTE: AIRPORT WAY IS NORTH/SOUTH ORIENTATION. t DATE: ' PROJECT: i 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection CAMPUS DRIVE/AIRPORT WAY , (Existing Traffic Volumes based on verage n er pr ng 95 PM Peak 21, Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Protects Projected 1'. of Projected Project Direction - Peek 24 Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2$ Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume i Northbound —0— 0 00 0 0 Southbound 640 0 10 650 6 i 68 _ Eastbound 1806 0 0 1806 18 i 64 Westbound 4168 0 76 4244 42 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected , Peak 2.� Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ' 0 Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. NOTE: AIRPORT WAY IS NORTH/SOUTH ORIENTATION. DATE: PROJECT: ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection CAMPUS DRIVE/DOVE STREET (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 195 AM Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2§ Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Peek 211 Hour ' Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume i Volume ' Northbound 3142 32 I 0 40 3182 0 I ' southbound 1866 0 10 18 ? 68 ound 14 0 0 14 0 i 0 i ' WEastb estbound 273 0 6 279 3 0 ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Q Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: FnRM T 1% Traffic Volume Analysis , Intersection CAMPUS DRIVE/DOVE STREET ' (Existing Traffic Volumes basedon Average- Winter/Spring g, -PM Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peek 2y Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 211 Hour Pea k'2y Hour Peak 2k Hou Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 2026 0 0 2026 20 + 0 Southbound 4112 0 24 4136 41 68 Eastbound 25 i i Westbound 6 0 40 713 7 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ' Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume ® Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ' Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: PROJECT: ' FnDM T ' APPENDIX B ' ICU WORKSHEETS 1 B1422SAM ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: BIRCH & DOVE 4225 ' EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC-- WINTER/SPRING 1992 AN ------....... • ......................... _ .- - IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICCMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVolume I V/C I ' I IcapacityI Pa ' yl I I I ! Volume I•. - Ratio I I --------- Ica --t I --tune I Ratio I Volume I Vol--- 41------Ol-- 010.011 I NL 1 1600 I I I 1 0 ------ -----------------------------------------------I 418 1 01 41 0.21 1 01 0.211* I--------) 3200 ------------------ ) 0.20 i-------01-..------------------------—i---.--•I NR 1_________________ _ I SL 1 16001 I 118 I0.07 * 01 01 0.07*I 01 0.07Ix ' . ___.__.._._i__..__..i---- ----- --------- --------------------------- I IBT 3D0 I 0I 25I --------------- _ I SR I 1 18 1 p1 01 ...__..-_1- 01 1 ------•------------------ - ----- _......I I_..EL._) ._._.._i------..i_...-4s•)- I 01 01 I 01 I ------••------•--- ---------•-------------------- -•---------I I ET ) 1600 I 1 235 ) 0.18 * 01 01 0.18*1 01 0.181* ................. ..............................................I ' I ER ) I 1 9 ) 1 01 01 1 01 1-------------------••--••--•------•--..----- ---------------------------I 1_________________ _ 46 0.03 * i *I I Ix I Wt. 1 1600 I I I 01 8 0.03 0 0.031 i-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- ' I WT 1 16001 1 38 I 0.021 d DI- 0:02- 31 0.03I I WR 1 16001 1 441 0.031 d 01 0.03 1 01 OA IEXISTING 31 ' __________________________i..___.._...__...__._.._.___. 0.48 I I IEXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0.49 1 1 I---------------•--------------------------------------------------------•------------------1 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U._-•-----___---•-----•-__---_I 0.491 --------------•••--•------- ---- ._..._.. ' I� Projected + project traffic will be less than or equal to 0.90 CI Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 ' I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement Witt be Less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will ' be less than I.C.U. without project Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM II BI4225AN BI4225PM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: BIRCH & DOVE 4225 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1992 PM ' I - ,IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTllIGIREGIONALICONMITTEDI•PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I,V/C Ratio IVolume I WC I I lCapaeitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Projectl I Ratio I ' I I I I I I I I Volume I I I I----------------••----------•--------------"---•-••--•-•--•--•-••--------------------•----I NL 1600 17 __ 0.01 --- 0.01* 1 01 0:01{ I I I I I 01 01 ..I NI 1 1 355 1 01 61 0.13 I 010.131 3200 ) 0.13 ___________________________I NR I I 64 I of of I of _-I I SL 1 1600 1 1 41 1 0.03 1 01 01 0.03 1 010.031 ------------------------------------------- -------•----------------•--•-----••----------• I I ST 1 1 922 1 01 61 0.30*1 010-.301 ' --------) 3200 ------------------) 0.30 ----------------------- SR 1 1 38 I 01 01 1 01 I --------•--------I- -----••--- ---•---------' -. . •-•-••----I---•---------- EL ) 27 ) of 01 1 I --------- ------..._....._ ...............................................I ET ) 1600 I I 81 ) 0.OB * 01 01 0.09*1 II 01 0.09 --------- .................. •-'•-••-I....'--__I...__.......---•--'.. ER ) Z 1o2 ...._--..._.'....... ........... _ .....__......._ _._.._.. . _ _ Q..._....�iI ' WL 1 1600 I 1 275 1 0.17 ' Of 10I 0.,18*1 01 o.186 I-----------------••--•-•---------•------------•-- WT 1 1600 I 1 160 1 0.10 1 01 1 51 0:1 1. 1 31_9 ail I--------------------------•----------------•-------•----.--•-- I 1 WR 1 16001 1 142 1 0.091 01 11 0.09 1 010.09f 1 __•____________________________........................._....................a...... 1 EXIST IN G i . I . .. I EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0.58 1 ------- !............................................................................................ ' IEXiSTING + COMMITTED + 'REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. 10.581 i Projected + project traffic will be less than or equal to 0.90 , I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. wilt be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be ' less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than'I.C.U. without project , ............................... Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM it ' BI4225PM 8I4200AM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: QUAIL 3 BIRCH 4200 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1992 AM ............................................................................................. ' I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVOLume I V/C I I ICapecitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Projectl I Ratio I ' I I I I I I I I volume I I I I-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I I NL 1 1600I 1 14 1 0.01 1 01 __0.01__ _ 00 I-------------------------------------------- 0I l 1.. I 1 NT 1 1 696 1 01 12� O'33*1.....0I .931 --------) 3200 ------------------) 0.33 *...__.--- --- MR 1 1 350 l 01 51 1 01 1 I--------------------------------------------------•---------------•--------- -....I ' I SL 1 1600 1 1 84 1 0.05 * .....01. 01 0.05* 01 .051 I --------------------•-------Zn---------- -------- I 1 01 331 0.10_-'- 010.101 1SR1 1 15 .-..___-__....0�___--..0--.--•---.-_-_-_--—�__---..I -------- .................. ...............................................I l ET ) 1600 1 1 133 ) 0.11 * 01 of 0. 11* 1 31 0.111` I-------- ------------------ ----------------------------------------------1 ER ) I I is ) I pl 01 1 01 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I l WL I 160D 1 1 n 1 0.05 * 01 51 0.05*1 01 0.051* I------••--------------------------------•--------•--------•----------------------•---------I l VT 1 16001 1 421 0.031 01 01 0.03 1 010.031 .....-•--------------------------------------------------------•------------._....-.-..----I WR 1 1600 1 1 40 1 0.03 I 01 -01 0.03 1 010.031 I-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I ' (EXISTING 1 0.54 1 1 I-------------------------------------------------------------------------•-----------------I (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0.54 1 1 I 1---------------------•------------------......----------------•_--------------------._....-i ' (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U-----------------------------1 0.541 ....................•.._........_.............._._...... ........ I� Projected + project traffic will be less than or equal to 0.90 tI_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement WILL be Less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will ' be Less than I.C.U. without project Description of system improvement: ' PROJECT` FORM II 614200AN � 1 814200PM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: QUAIL i BIRCH 4200, ' EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1992- -PM ........................................................................•--••-.-••.•. I (EXISTING PROPOSED(EXISTING I EXISTING REGIONAL COMMITTED PROJECTED I PROJECT(PROJECT( �Movement Icepacity�Capacity� Volume Ratio VoltmeH Votune lw/o CP Ratio oject�Volume Ratio I ' I I I I Volune I .........................•___...----•---_....---__...-----•-_......_________••_-_____...... NL 1 1600 1 1 23 1 0.01 * 01 01 0.01* 1 0 ....----•---...--•--•....................•---.._.....------••-•--•••••---•....- NT - MR ._) 3200 I-....... ---- 268 ) 0.12 !•._._ 0.I......6.!.�:1 2.._ 118 III --• I 33 0.02 .I._'.. 99.!-...-_ . .._.....QQ..!�..Q..r...9._ ----- --•••---- •--•-••---------•••---- - � I 02 t ......... .Qr. ------- 3200 -------••----•• ) 0.37'I------0'•---.t 28 I 1 51 11 EL23 )--- _----•- ----____•_•_-••--•• ••-••- —0- ------- 1_ ----- ----- * ' ...Q......_._I ' I ET ) 1600 1 1 49 ) 0.07 * 01 0 1 0.07* 1 3 1 0.0 * i-•••-•••••--•--••-•-----------------------..-._.._o_�.......9.�_..._......�..._4.�.... I WL 1 1600 1 1 257 1 0.16 * 01 141- I--- ---------- ---•-------•----- ---- -----••------------- -- .................!•---•-........_...-•--•.... 0 1 20 1 0_--- I 0 1 0:9. WR 1 1600 I I 73 I 0.05 1 01 0 1 0.05 1 0 1 0% (EXISTING I' 0.61 I ...........................I I___---•-•••--••----•-•-•-••-••---•--••-••-••--•-___--•-•-••..... EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0.63 1 1 ............................................................... ..._.....__'..._..._.. ...•_• (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. 10.63 1 1�+ Projected + project traffic wilt be less then or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. wilt be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic t.C.U. w/systems inprovement will be tess,than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be Less than I.C.U. without project ' -...................................................................................... Des cription of system improvement: PROJECT FORM 11 ' 81420OPH ' CA9301AM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: CAMPUS AND AIRPORT WAY 9301 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1995 AM ............................................................................................. ' I IEXISTiNGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED IPROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I I ICapacitylCapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume Iw/o Projectl I Ratio I I 1 I I I I 1 I Volume 1 I I I NL I I I I I I I I I I ------------------------------------------------------------••---••----•-•- ------I ' I NT I I I i I I I I I I ______________________________________I MR I I I I I I------------•------•-I-------I I SL I I I . I I I I I I. I --I I ST 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 -----------------•I I I SR 1 3200 1 1 220 1 0.07 * 01 8 1 0.07* 1 35 10.08A 1--------------------------------------------------•----•-------------------------•---------I 1 EL 1 1600 1 1 205 1 0.13 1 01 0 1 0.13 1 27 10.15 1 -----------------------------------------------•------I 1170 1 01 231 0.37* 1 0 10.371 I - .. --.._._ ER 1 I D I I .-I------------ I I WI. i I I I I I I ...__.._..I I I ' --.�_..------.. ----.--- ----------------•----- - ----------.I i i 560 1 01 0 1 0.13 1 0 10.13 1 1-------) 4800 ..................3 0.13 --..--••••-------_---- -----1 1 45 1 01 3 1 1 0 1 1 -----------------------------------------------------I (EXISTING --------------------------1- 0.44 1 I ' 1.....................•----------....._......_....---....--..._._---------.----•-•----------I (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0.44 1 1 I 1----------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------i ' (EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. 10.45 1 ........................................................................................ .. 119' Projected + project traffic will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will ' be less than I.C.U. without project Description of system improvement: ' PROJECT FORM 11 CA9301AM 1 CA9301PH ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: CAMPUS AND AIRPORT WAY 9301 ' EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1995 PM ...-•••••.•-•..-•............................•................._....._.._.._......_.......... I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED I PROJECT IPROJECTIL ' INovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK MR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio 1Votume I V/C I 1. ICapacitylcapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 'lw/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I I 1-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I I NL 1 I I I I I I I I I i --•-•--•----•-•-•••---•----•--•-----•-•---•••-•-•----•••••-----•-------------•---•••-- •I I NT I I I I I I I I I I 1-••-•--•--••--•••---------•-------•--•••-•••-•---•--••--••------ ________._ _ _••-•--- ....I ' I NR I I I I I I I I I I I St. I i I I I I II I I I. __..._._•.........................................................__... I I ST I I I I I I I I I I IEL • 00 .. --.• .. ... 69 1..'0. - :................................••-•I 12 1 1 ' SR 300 320 0.10 10 * 001 51 0.10 l 3510.11Ik ____________________•••---•------•--•-------I I 1 1 I I 11 1 of 0.04* 1 3210.061* -____--•--•_------ •••-•••-•- --------------------••--•---•-•-•-- I ET I I ... I 01 01 0.26 . 010.261 I ER I 1 0 1 1 1 11 1 1 I•--•--•••••••••••-••-----------------------------------------------------------•...........I I WL I I I I I I I I I I I -•-••-••--•-•-•---•--•-•••••-------------------------------------------------------------I I WT I I Im 1 01 101 0.44* 1 01 0.441* I........D 4800 ..................3 0.43 ►..............--------------------------------I ' WR 1 1 312 1 01 281 1 0L 1 (EXISTING 1 0.51 I ' I-•--------••-------•-------•-•----••-•----••-•-----•-••--•---••••---•---------•---•--•---•-I (EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0.58 1 'I I !............................................................................................ ' ]EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH +'PROJECT I.C.U. 1 0.6 11 I}Q Projected + project traffic will be less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. wilt be greater than 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be , Less than or equal to 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements wilt be less than I.C.U. without project ' Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM 11 , CA9301PH CA4220AN ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' INTERSECTION: CAMPUS AND DOVE 4220 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC HINTER/SPRING 1995AM ............................................................................................. ' I IEXI STING I PROPOSED IEXI ST INGIEXI STING IREGIONAL[COMMITTED I PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio IVolune I V/C I I icapacitylcapacityl volune I Ratio I Volume I Volume lw/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I Volume I I I I-._. .---------•-""'--------------I i NL 1 16001 1 241 0.021 01 01 0.02 1 010.021 ---------•-•-----------------------I ' IMY 1 1 1304 01 201 0.34 1 010.34t 1--------) 4800 - ----) 0.33 i---------•------i.------•----------i.------I I MR 1 1 285 I---•------------ -------------------------------•---•-------_._.__.----•------------------ ' 1 SL 1 1600 1 1 200 1 0.13 * 01 01 0. 13* 1 3110.14 1-------------•---------•---------- -------•- ----------------- 11 1 1 01 51 0.13 1 310.131 I--------) 4800 ------------------) 0.13' ---------- -0..-----•I 1 SR 1 1 7 1 01 01 I I I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 EL 1 1600 1 1 1 1 0.011* 01 01 0.01* 1 010.01t ' 1---ET-------..-..i----_-..i------------------------------------------••.- -I I 0 1 01 01 0.01 1 010.01f I' - --) 1600 ------•-----------) 0.01".............................................. ER I 1 7 I 01 01 1 01 I' - 45 ) 1 01 01 .___ -----1- 01 I 1------•--------•------------•--------•-------------------------- ---•-•--------I 1 WT ) 1600 1 1 1 ) 0.07 * 01 01 0.07* 1 010.07t ' ------------------•--------- ..... ---.--------------•---...-----------•------...""'...•..I 1 WR ) 1 1 70 ) 1 01 31 1 01 1 ---•--I 1EXISTING -------- --------- - ----------------------- 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0.55 1 1 I 1--------•-- --------•-------••---------------I ' 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U...... ......... ............1 0.6 71 .�..................................................... 1XI Projected + project traffic will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project ..... ..................................................'. Description of system improvement: ' PROJECT FORM 11 CA4220AM t CA4220PM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: CAMPUS AND DOVE 4220 EXIST TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 1995 PM ............................................................................................. I IEXISTINGIPROPOSEDIEXISTINGIEXISTINGIREGIONALICOMMITTEDI PROJECTED 1PROJECTIPROJECTI ' IMovementl Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio (Volume I V/C I ICapacitylcapacityl Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume 1w/o Projectl I Ratio I I I I I I I I I MUM I I I I-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I I NL I 1600 I 1 40 1 0.03 • 0.1 of 0.03*1 OI 0.03� I-------------------------- ---• ............................................... I I NT I I 769 1 01 01 0.18 1 01 0.181 ........) 4800 ..................) 0.16 i...............................................11 ' MR n 01 01 1 01 1 1 ........................................................................................I SL 1 1600 1 1 120 1 O.OB 1 01 01 0.08 1 311 0.091 ' I---•••--------•-•-------------•--•-----•--•-••-•----•-----•-•--•--------••••-------•--•----I I ST 1 1 1970 I OG 121 0.41*1 31 0.411* ........) 4800 ..................) . 0.41 ----------------------------------------------I I1IB R I I 2 I I I I 01 I i.....__. -- • - - .._.... ..__..._..--•...............1 EL I1600 i 1 I 0.0 ol �I 0.01*1 010.011 * -------•------•••-•-•-•------•-•-••-•--•-:. -- . ...............•••..... ' •. ET I I 1 1 01 01 0.01 1 Op0.011 - ER----- 1600 --••••-•--•-••-•3) 0.00 -••--_-_— —-••--••• --•-••-•--••----------•••- of I 1 ...... I ................. I I I I WL ) I 1 193 ) 1 01 201 1 01 1 ' i•--•-••••--••-•••--•-••••----•-••--•-•••••-•--•-••••••••-------------•---•••••----•-•••--_-I I WT ) 1600 1 1 3 ) 0.21 * 01 01 0.22*1 01 0.22I* ---.--••-•...................................................................••.......... 1 ' I uR ) I I 133 ) ( 01 01 I 01 I I---••--------•-•••---•---------------••----------•••••••-•--•••---•-------•-•-----_--•-----I 1EXISTING 1 0.60 I-•--•--•••-••••-----•--•••-•--•-••••••-••••••-----•---••-•-•-• ••.•.- ' 1EXIST + REG GROWTH + CCMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. 1 0.67 1 1 I I-------------------•.......................................................................1 1EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. 10.671 '............................................................................................. I Projected + project traffic will be less then or equal to 0.90 I_I Projected +project traffic I.C.U. will be greater then 0.90 , 1_1 Projected + project traffic t.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' 1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be Less than I.C.U. without project .. .... .... ...... .................... ..... Description of system improvement: PROJECT FORM lI ' CA422OPM Intersection: Airport Wy. (NS) / Campus Dr. (EW) ' Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing Conditions (1995) Lane Configuration: Initial ' AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V/C ' Move- Lanes Capacity Volume Ratio - NL 0. 0 0 0 0.00 NT 0.0 0 0 0. 00 ' NR 0.0 0 0 0. 00 SL 0.0 0 0 0.00 ST 0. 0 0 0 0.00 ' SR 2 . 0 3200 220 0. 07* EL 1.0 1600 205 0.13 ET 2. 0 3200 1170 0.37* ' ER 0.0 0 0 0.00 WL 0.0 0 0 0.00* WT 3 .0 4800 560 0.13 ' WR 0. 0 1600 45 _0_03-- Sum of Critical Movements = 0.44 A ' PM Intersection Capacity Analysis V/C Move Lanes Capacity Volume Ratio ' ------ ----- -------- ------ ------- NL 0.0 0 0 0.00 NT 0. 0 0 0 0.00 NR 0. 0 0 0 0.00 ' SL 0.0 0 0 0. 00 ST 0.0 0 0 0. 00 SR 2.0 3200 320 0.10* EL 1.0 1600 69 0. 04* ET 2.0 3200 834 0.26 ' ER 0.0 0 0 0. 00 WL 0.0 0 0 0.00 WT 3.0 4800 1772 0.43* ' WR 0. 0 1600 312 _0_20-- Sum of Critical Movements = 0.57 A ' * denotes critical movement Intersection: Campus Dr. (NS) / Dove St. (EW) Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance ' Traffic Condition: Existing Conditions (1995) Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V/C Move Lanes Capacity Volume Ratio ------ ----- -------- ------ ------- ' NL 1.0 1600 24 0.02 NT 3.0 4806 1304 0.33* NR 0.0 1600 285 0.18 SL 1.0 1600 200 0.13* ' ST 3. 0 4860 618 0.13 SR 0.0 1600 7 0.01 EL 1.0 1600 1 0.01* ET 1.0 1600 0 0.01 ER 0.0 1600 7 0.01 ' WL 0.0 1600 45 0.03 WT 1.0 1600 1 0.07* WR 0.0 1606 70 0.04 ' Sum of Critical Movements = 757 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis ' V/C Move Lanes Capacity Volume Ratio ------ ----- -------- ------ ------- NL 1.0 1600 40 0.03* ' NT 3.0 4800 769 0.18 NR 0.0 1600 77 0.05 SL 1.0 1600 120 0.08 ' ST 3.0 4800 1970 0.41* SR 0.0 1600 2 0.01 EL 1.0 1600 1 0.01* ' ET 1.0 1600 1 0.01 ER 0.0 1600 3 0.01 WL 0. 0 1600 193 0.12 ' WT 1. 0 1600 3 0.21* WR 0.0 1600 133 0.08 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.66~ B , * denotes critical movement , Intersection: Birch St. (NS) / Dove St. (EW) Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing Conditions (1995) Lane Configuration: Initial ' AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V/C Move Lanes Capacity Volume Ratio NL 1. 0 1600 17 0.01 NT 2. 0 3200 418 0.20* NR 0. 0 1600 228 0.14 ' SL 1. 0 1600 118 0.07* ST 2 . 0 3200 300 0.10 ' SR 0. 0 1600 18 0.01 EL 0.0 1600 45 0.03 ET 1. 0 1600 235 0.18* ER 0.0 1600 9 0.01 WL 1. 0 1600 46 0.03* WT 1.0 1600 38 0.02 ' WR 1.0 1600 44 -0_03-- Sum of Critical Movements = 0.48 A ' PM Intersection Capacity Analysis V/C Move Lanes Capacity Volume Ratio ------ ----- -------- ------ ------- NL 1. 0 1600 17 0.01* NT 2. 0 3200 355 0.13 NR 0. 0 1600 64 0.04 ' SL 1.0 1600 41 0.03 ST 2.0 3200 922 0.30* SR 0.0 1600 38 0.02 EL 0. 0 1600 27 0.02 ET 1. 0 1600 81 0.08* ' ER 0. 0 1600 27 0.02 WL 1.0 1600 275 0.17* WT 1.0 1600 160 0. 10 WR 1.0 1600 142 _0_09_- Sum of Critical Movements = 0.56 A ' * denotes critical movement I Intersection: Birch St. (NS) / Quail St. (EW) Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing ordinance ' Traffic Condition: Existing Conditions (1995) Lane Configuration: Initial ' AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V/C Move Lanes Capacity Volume Ratio - - ' NL 1.0 1600 14 0.01 NT 2.0 3200 696 0'.33* NR 0.0 1600 350 0.22 ' SL 1.0 1600 84 0.05* ST 2.0 3200 277 0.09 ' SR 0.01 1600 15 0.01 EL 0.0 1600 21 0.01 ET 1.0 1600 133 0.11* ' ER 0.0 1600 15 0.01 WL 1.0 1600 72 0.05* WT 1.0 1600 42 0.03 ' WR 1.0 1600 40 0.03 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.54 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis ' V/C Move Lanes Capacity Volume Ratio_ ' ---- ----- -------- ------ ----- NL 1.0 1600 23 0.01* NT 2.0 3200 268 0.12 NR 0.0 1600 118 0.07 , SL 1.-0 1600 33 0.02 ST 2. 0 3200 1171 0.37* SR 0.0 1600 28 0.02 EL 0.0 1600 23 0.01 ' ET 1.0 1600 49 0.07* ER 0.0 1600 32 0.02 ' WL 1.0 1600 257 0.16* WTI 1.0 1600 70 _00 ' WR 1.0 1600 73 0.055 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.61 B * denotes critical movement t ' Intersection: Airport Wy. (NS) / Campus Dr. (EW) ' Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing + Committed Projects Lane Configuration: Initial ' AM Intersection Capacity Analysis ' ------- V- O- L- U- M- E- 5------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 NT 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 NR 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ' SL 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ST 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 SR 2 .0 3200 220 0 8 228 0.07* ' EL 1. 0 1600 205 0 0 205 0.13 ET 2 . 0 3200 1170 0 23 1193 0.37* ER 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ' WL 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0,.00* WT 3.0 4800 560 0 0 560 0.13 WR 0.0 1600 45 0 3 48 _0_033 ' Sum of Critical Movements = 0.44 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis ------- V- 0- L- U -- E- 5 ----- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project- -- Other Total Ratio ' ------ ----- -------- ---------- -----0- ----- ------- --0.00----- NL 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 NT 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ' NR 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 SL 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ST 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ' SR 2 . 0 3200 320 0 5 325 0.10* EL 1.0 1600 69 0 0 69 0.04* ET 2. 0 3200 834 0 0 834 0.26 ER 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 WL 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 WT 3 .0 4800 1772 0 10 1782 0.44* ' WR 0.0 1600 312 0 28 340 -0_21_- Sum of Critical Movements = 0.58 A * denotes critical movement Intersection: Campus Dr. (NS) / Dove St. (EW) Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance , Traffic Condition: Existing + Committed Projects Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis , V O L U M E S ' -----------------------------�---- V C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ----- -=--- ---=---- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ---__.- NL 1. 0 1600 24 0 0 24 0.02 ' NT 3.0 4800 1304 0 20 1324 0.34* NR 0. 0 1600 285 0 0 285 0. 18 SL 1.0 1600 200 0 0 200 0.13* ' ST 3.0 4800 618 0 5 623 0.13 SR 0.0 1600 7 0 0 7 0.01 EL 1.0 1600 1 0 0 1 0.01* , ET 1.0 1600 0 0 0 0 0.01 ER 0.0 1600 7 0 0 7 0.01 WL 0.0 1600 45 0 0 45 0.03 , WT 1.0 1600 1 0 0 1 0.07* WR 0.0 1600 70 0 3 73 0.05 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.55 A ' PM Intersection Capacity Analysis -----V-0-L_U-M-E-M------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio NL 1.0 1600 40 0 0 40 0.03 NT 3.0 4800 769 0 0 769 0.18 NR 0.0 1600 77 0 0 77 0.05 , SL 1.0 1600 120 0 0 120 0.08 ST 3.0 4800 1970 0 12 1982 0.41* SR 0.0 1600 2 0 6 2 0.01 , EL 1.0 1600 1 0 0 1 0.01* ET 1.0 1600 1 0 0 1 0.01 ER 0.0 1600 3 0 0 3 0.01 t WL 0.0 1600 193 0 20 213 0.13 WT 1.0 1600 3 0 0 3 0.22* WR 0.0 1600 133 0 0 133 01.08 , Sum of Critical Movements = 0.67 B * denotes critical movement ' ' Intersection: Birch St. (NS) / Dove St. (EW) ' Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing + Committed Projects ' Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis -------V---L---M-E-5------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- ' NL 1.0 1600 17 0 4 21 0.01 NT 2.0 3200 418 0 4 422 0.21* NR 0.0 1600 228 0 6 234 0.15 ' SL 1.0 1600 118 0 0 118 0.07* ST 2.0 3200 300 0 25 325 0.11 SR 0.0 1600 18 0 0 18 0.01 ' EL 0.0 1600 45 0 0 45 0.03 ET 1. 0 1600 235 0 0 235 0.18* ER 0.0 1600 9 0 0 9 0.01 ' WL 1.0 1600 46 0 8 54 0.03* WT 1.0 1600 38 0 0 38 0.02 WR 1.0 1600 44 0 0 44 0.03 ' Sum of Critical Movements = 0.49 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis ' -------V- E---------- V/C ' Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ----- - NL 1.0 1600 17 0 0 17 0.01* NT 2 .0 3200 355 0 6 361 0.13 NR 0. 0 1600 64 0 0 64 0.04 SL 1.0 1600 41 0 0 41 0.03 ST 2.0 3200 922 0 6 928 0.30* ' SR 0.0 1600 38 0 0 38 0.02 EL 0.0 1600 27 0 0 27 0.02 ET 1.0 1600 81 0 0 81 0.09* ' ER 0.0 1600 27 0 2 29 0.02 WL 1. 0 1600 275 0 10 285 0.18* ' WT 1. 0 1600 160 0 15 175 _011-- WR 1.0 1600 142 0 1 143 0.09 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.58 A ' * denotes critical movement I Intersection: Birch St. (NS) / Quail St. (EW) ' Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance ' Traffic Condition: Existing + Committed Projects Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis , V O L U M E S ' ---------------------------------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 1.0 1600 14 0 0 14 0.01 , NT 2.0 3200 696 0 12 708 0.33* NR 0.0 1600 350 0 5 355 0.22 SL 1.0 1600 84 0 0 84 0.05* , ST 2.0 3200 277 0 33 310 0.10 SR 0.0' 1600 15 0 0 15 0.01 EL 0. 0 1600 21 0 0 21 0.01 ' ET 1.0 1600 133 0 0 133 0.11* ER 0.0 i600 15 0 0 15 0.01 WL 1.0 1600 72 0 5 77 0.05* ' WT 1.0 1600 42 0 0 42 0.03 WR 1.0 1600 40 0 0 40 0.03 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.54 A ' PM Intersection Capacity Analysis ------V---L----M- E_-------- V/C , Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ----- - ' NL 1.0 1600 23 0 0 23 0.01* NT 2.0 3200 268 0 6 274 0.12 NR 0.0 1600 118 0 0 118 0.07 ' SL 1.0 1600 33 0 0 33 0.02 ST 2.0 3200 1171 0 26 1197 0.38* SR 0.0 1660 28 0 5 33 0.02 ' EL 0.0 1600 23 0 0 23 0.01 ET 1.0 1600 49 0 0 49 0.07* ER 0.0 1600 32 0 0 32 0.02 ' WL 1.0 1600 257 0 14 271 0.17* WT 1.0 1600 70 0 20 90 0.06 WR 1.0 1600 73 0 0 73 _0.05-- ' Sum of Critical Movements = 0.63 B * denotes critical movement ' ' Intersection: Airport Wy. (NS) / Campus Dr. (EW) ' Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing + Project + Committed Projects Lane Configuration: Initial ' AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V O L U M E S ' ---------------------------------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 NT 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 NR 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ' SL 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ST 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 SR 2.0 3200 220 34 8 262 0.08* ' EL 1. 0 1600 205 27 0 232 0.15 ET 2 .0 3200 1170 0 23 1193 0.37* ER 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ' WL 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00* WT 3 .0 4800 560 0 0 560 0.13 WR 0.0 1600 45 0 3 48 0.'03 ' Sum of Critical Movements = 0.45 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis ' -------V-�--L- U M E-5------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ' ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----0 ------- --0.'00----- NL 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 NT 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ' NR 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 SL 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ST 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 ' SR 2.0 3200 320 34 5 359 0.11* EL 1.0 1600 69 32 0 101 0.06* ET 2.0 3200 834 0 0 834 0.26 ' ER 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 WL 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 WT 3 . 0 4800 1772 0 10 1782 0.44* WR 0. 0 1600 312 0 28 340 0_21_ -- Sum of Critical Movements = 0.61 B ' * denotes critical movement Intersection: Campus Dr. (NS) / Dove St. (EW) , Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance ' Traffic Condition: Existing + Project + Committed Projects Lane Configuration: Initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis ' V O L U M E S ' ---------------------------------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ------- NL 1.0 1600 24 0 0 24 0.02 ' NT 3 .0 4800 1304 0 20 1324 0.34* NR 0.0 1600 285 0 0 285 0.18 SL 1.0 1600 200 31 0 231 0.14* ' ST 3 . 0 4800 618 3 5 626 0.13 SR 0.0 1600 7 0 0 7 0.01 EL 1.0 1600 1 0 0 1 0.01* ' ET 1.0 1600 0 0 0 0 0.01 ER 0.0 i600 7 0 0 7 0.01 WL 0.0 1600 45 0 0 45 0.03 ' WT 1.0 1600 1 0 0 1 0.07* WR 0.0 1600 70 0 3 73 0.05 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.56 A ' PM Intersection Capacity Analysis V O L U M E S ' ------- ------------------------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio- ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- -----* NL 1.0 1600 40 0 0 40 NT 3. 0 4800 769 0 0 769 0.18 NR 0.0 1600 77 0 0 77 0.05 SL 1. 0 1600 120 31 0 151 0.09 , ST 3.0 4800 1970 3 12 1985 0.41* SR 0.0 1600 2 0 0 2 0.01 ' EL 1.0 1600 1 0 0 1 0.01* ET 1.0 1600 1 0 0 1 0.01 ER 0.0 1600 3 0 0 3 0.01 ' WL 0. 0 1600 193 0 20 213 0.13 WT 1.0 1600 3 0 0 3 0.22* WR 0.0 1600 133 0 0 133 0.08 ' Sum of Critical Movements = 0.67 B * denotes critical movement , Intersection: Birch St. (NS) / Dove St. (EW) Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Condition: Existing + Project + Committed Projects Lane Configuration: Initial ' AM Intersection Capacity Analysis V O L U M E S ' ---------------------------------- Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ------- ----- ------- ------- ' NL 1.0 1600 17 0 4 21 0.01 NT 2. 0 3200 418 0 4 422 0.21* NR 0.0 . 1600 228 0 6 234 0.15 ' SL 1. 0 1600 118 0 0 118 0.07* ST 2. 0 3200 300 0 25 325 0.11 SR 0.0 1600 18 0 0 18 0.01 ' EL 0.0 1600 45 0 0 45 0.03 ET 1.0 1600 235 0 0 235 0.18* ER 0.0 1600 9 0 0 9 0.01 ' WL 1. 0 1600 46 0 8 54 0.03* WT 1.0 1600 38 3 0 41 0.03 WR 1. 0 1600 44 0 0 44 0.03 ' Sum of Critical Movements = 0.49 A PM Intersection Capacity Analysis ' -------V-�-L-U-M-E--5------- V/C ' Move- Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total- Ratio - NL 1.0 1600 17 0 0 17 0.01* NT 2 .0 3200 355 0 6 361 0.13 ' NR 0. 0 1600 64 0 0 64 0.04 SL 1. 0 1600 41 0 0 41 0.03 ST 2. 0 3200 922 0 6 928 0.30* ' SR 0. 0 1600 38 0 0 38 0.02 EL 0.0 1600 27 0 0 27 0.02 ET 1.0 1600 81 0 0 81 0.09* ' ER 0.0 1600 27 0 2 29 0.02 WL 1.0 1600 275 0 10 285 0.18* WT 1.0 1600 160 3 15 178 0.11 ' WR 1.0 1600 142 0 1 143 _0_09 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.58 A ' * denotes critical movement Intersection: Birch St. (NS) / Quail St. (EW) Project: Avis QTA Facility Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance ' Traffic Condition: Existing + Project + Committed Projects Lane Configuration: initial AM Intersection Capacity Analysis ' V O L U M E S ' ---------------------------------- V/C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- NL 1.0 1600 14 0 0 14 0.01 ' NT 2 .0 3200 696 0 12 708 0.33* NR 0. 0 1600 350 0 5 355 0.22 SL 1.0 1600 84 0 0 84 0.105* , ST 2.0 3200 277 0 33 310 0.10 SR 0.0 1600 15 0 0 15 0.01 EL 0.0 1600 21 0 0 21 0.01 ' ET 1.0 1600 133 3 0 136 0.11* ER 0.0 1600 15 0 0 15 0..01 WL 1. 0 1600 72 0 5 77 0.05* ' WT 1.0 1600 42 0 0 42 0.03 WR 1.0 1600 40 0 0 40 0.03 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.54Y A , PM Intersection Capacity Analysis ----- V O L U M E S ------------------------- V C Move Lanes Capacity Background Project Other Total Ratio ------ ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----- ------- ---- ' NL 1.0 1600 23 0 0 23 0.01-*- NT 2. 0 32,00 268 0 6 274 0.12 NR 0.0 1600 118 0 0 118 0.07 ' SL 1.0 1600 33 0 0 33 0.02 ST 2,0 3200 1171 0 26 1197 0.38* SR 0.0 1600 28 0 5 33 0.02 , EL 0.0 1600 23 0 0 23 0.01 ET 1. 0 1600 49 3 0 52 0.07* ER 0.0 1600 32 0 0 32 0.02 ' WL 1.0 1600 257 0 14 271 0.17* WT 1.0 1600 70 0 20 90 0.06 WR 1.0 1600 73 0 0 73 0.05 Sum of Critical Movements = 0.63v B * denotes critical movement ' 7 HATQ Al RENT-A-f 323•-O• - M M YOroRIZN iRAFFlL CONTROLLERS•GATE MM NEW 6'-0•CHAIMINK FENCE BURgNG OEF91E r AND Gum Boov N Sol l l7• W 290.10, N 5011'17' W 290.01, . . `. ' j % NLW b'-o'HIGH C CRE)E r / E)BT bpb5 / BLOCTC WNl, � r,r EXISTING MPROACH ro-eE uoWTm NEW L SCAPE ° — _ - - - - - - - ° EXI PEW BE TER AREA L PL TER BE REYOVm l..• CMWABH CMWY vnTx•(4)NFL "caiem oac w u m - oopppm I a• \_ - LOT 2 / . :. A. i�h / T\ �•. /. ' rr\ POST-SFRNCE IXIEING - - --- \� •• r7,',•. \ l r 1 PORINW OF EIOSTINC - �Q ` .•.�y' \ .i'�C..Y' ° \'.�.. ,1 K Mo -� \I©\• © \: D a NEW WNN 0NK GAME MPROACH TO BE K REMOVED.REPLACE v " LOT PI I< PP L W/NEW 9DEWALLG n JIIIIIIIII E - SERWCE IS D IZOW GAL UNDERGR M m W {_ DOVBIEWNt GASMWE IL W r I A I 'T W N 5011'17' W 290.10' , J EDSBNG BUILDINGS E»S1ING � oo w BE REMOVED 1RMSFORMR FNLOAIRE VJ CTM BE OF ALL EXISRNC)co o TT•,�Z o 1J. P - W MEG �] .•+•. H Q OT P 8 U NEW -O•HIGH NW-YOTCRIZED BLOCK WALL G w 1RAFFIC CIXMiHW-ERS O O n I 1 I Z ENTRY EXISTNG PEWTER TO Be Yo04Mm p= 9Dno'ze' R = 17.00' P F ' ® L- 26.71' EGSRNG MPROACH M BE REMNN (TYPICAL OE 5) DOVE STREET D 10 10 a BD 6G N TM E 1 SITE PLAN BCA�; ,--=D'-D• 111���111 E 1'-20•_0• a � I .PSD D 5 s As vfNSE v[N smiv Imm rt¢HAID ST 0 � AA1A5 R[NSE 91E FNI0.Y TO M1E Sf{ER iRMC tl5 N I.UPoC WlH MW_ 0 MEETING gm � yg�� ems+ SITE PLAN a D i4 Flej ISa ''303". + Ci G Z AVIS CI11CK 7U1 BIRCH ST FACLRY IE _ AXw wxc FEWPORT BEACH,CA AA@CRf } °r rev g—F-rs•i; slim AV/S a q An Employee—Owned Company a 'V•G- O .' 'L t, 33 2' `wry R ERT' I-L EEE tc AE=� ATMEI.ff C- T•.i v 'c n y v •.s%'P3.'J'vl y' .. "c�`>- 'ih- ®:m wm wuvva�u v.�w+maa.+:s NDiM .o°aA>wwA ARW16f .v+a NMr,ma onml 1FL HLIEIV emN_ oAMe art:baMAsas nnmw°1+ a°N AASAs 2 VICIN"Y MAP o A NO SCALE i �� waA Fssxm �� am / 2 O 4 a a 7 I _ T 2 3 4 3 6 7 8 fl b n u D 14 t3 1a .'� Y3 tzs-A , M M ZZ'-O• 22'-0' 22'-0• I2'-0• 10'-10• r-I rl '^ rn '-' r-I I SOO GAL WINOS ELO LJ H H LJ }^� LJ �Wty FIFO ^ LJ I - RND k MOTOR M v1ER UK CUBE TANK L TT rI •R (TYP OF])REELS N�4 w B H.P. L n 11 •RUDO•LOW BAY A00 WATT 1. n STORAGE COMPRESSOR 1 I 11 d METAL HALE FIXNRE "y TWO(2)VAWUM 11 I to It 11 ( "OF B) 1 DROPS UI U WAL HOSE SNOLE y` S PRODUCT MM I N �---L DISPENSER(TYP.OF{) A-� W TNO(z)ID HP.VAWs IC I r1 1J r-I r-1 1J rl WITH MUEFfERS MAUSTED IC LJ LJ LJ L THRU ROOF , CANOPY FASCIA ABOVE M OOM CANOPY YODEL FLCIURES U0.-400-441 F NORM RTH WATT SLr METAL HALE � ucxr FlKRrtiTM E(rxP.of.1 aD) N 1 t�e.et._o. CANOPY/SERVICE STORAGE BLDG. PLAN H i I PREFlNISHEO M UA T PAINT UAL ua+T GREY VENTHAODN LOVERS i p PR61NISHEO METAL p PANEL WALL.PAINT uwr caEY CAPY/SERVICE STORAGE BLDG. ELEVATION ELEVATION ELEVATION 2 ,�8.�,._a.NO 4 F F �---- ------- - - --1 E • I I ONtwASH 8AY E E ❑❑ OOO O , `ID D = ELEFJ FIR— O ELEVATION �T ...M GlE I�E1,IBq.6 .iTW_ 6 t�e._p_o. o )� FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS o p rffiET c O O AVIS 0"2 NA FACM c L * WWPMT BEACK CA a 5£SL • PAHItt M FASCIA V,S 4EE 4E FREAK RM. P VE0 METAL WALLS g ? � ` � PAINT NNT UGHT GREY An Employee—Owned Company E+ ®ROBEFi' FL LEE 8ASSOCLATES,INC. AAMTKM1M vomec wLAacb I,n Awm KmgAaFuvAe eFxFu,Au� [ni0 aa>-Ixa �._B. REF. IH_l1GA'!V-MIAt- Ml! xwN3 NINTH rgyw.n alx AAarys o A FLOOR PLAN EAST ELEVATION (WEST ELEVATION SIM) ^^„ ""° A m6RCiP, 2 i 1 2 a - 4 5 a 7 a 9 C n 12 A /4 U t6 t] Ws 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 LIATIONAL RENT-A-CAR 320'-0" M MOTORIZED TRAFFIC AA CONTROLLERS, GATE ARM NEW 6'-0" CHAINLINK FENCE BUILDING 15'-0" AND GUARD BOOTH loll 290.00' 290.00' O = w Z I cD v Uj M NEW 6'-0" HIGH CONCRETE 0 o n BLOCK WALL aUj < EXISTING APPROACH 0 I '[7EXIT TO REMAIN N tl L \ L I ��- ,,f-'Mom,�- rF,:=',-,:1 ,j,-' ',_r ,,__-=' r-� •l••: -;+,•' ,r_,: r,`,:- -,�-` ',:-,.-- ♦--,- J• ♦- ,. - - - -� - �: ar--; : • ' EXISTING PLANTER AREA NEW CURBCUT CARWASH { .. I ♦ ,� ):............::I:.:i:::..:......- i:.. TO BE REMOVED NEW 6'-0" HIGH ,r CONC. BLOCK WALL . ----- - J . rf NEW LANDSCAPE - 4 POST-SERVICE QUEING LOT 2 PLANTER •f�' ,=' i CANOPY WITH (3) FUEL l- .•�'� EM E DISPENSERS o o o f POR11ON OF EXISTING I -' BUI'�' J G r♦ T` ' EXISTING APPROACH K APPROACH TO BE -r _ r 12,000 GAL. UNDERGROUND TO REMAIN K - r, - DOUBLEWALL GASOLINE L��' 2 22 ( NEW CHAIN LINK GATE, REMOVED, REPLACE TANKo 0 0 €�: W/ NEW SIDEWALK r /GUAR?,-- .....................STORAGEBOOT _ W ♦- _ r - - - - rr - — — — O I 'J^ r - O :'- oo SERVICE ISLAND- _ SE CE SL D I lLJ Y..........-w........... ............ ...........,�.... ....:.............:...........r.:....-.....::...........r ........ '.. ......w'...........r.....-......w":..... w ........w.........r.:..........e�~.........,�+......-., ::� .... ........................; _ 15,-0" -- ..r CD F l ♦' ,� F Y CD ••r f - I r EXISTING BUILDINGS r' �, o Z TO BE REMOVED EXISTING ELECTRICAL �. ♦%�� / 1 ' (TYPICAL OF ALL EXISTING) TRANSFORMER ENLOSURE 0 V '~ LJ 1— j r H I r�II r' _ z o H :-•1 PR - S RVIC QUEI G -' ,= I 0- r _ rr 0 V) I ♦ r- NON-MOTORIZED TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS I -- .r •r- - - - _ - - — lr '%�• ...w............w............ ...........,.............,......... ..,\... BLOCK WALL _ r CN •..:.............:..........................r.:....................................:...........r... .. - r NEW H - o EXISTING PLANTER TO BE MODIFIED ENTRY '' � - F F EXISTING APPROACH TO BE REMAIN 0 10 20 40 60 80 REF. (TYPICAL OF 3) O NORTH DOVE STREET N E SCALE: 1"=20'-O" E SITE PLAN 1„=20'-0" Q • o o 0 4/21/95 REVISE SITE ENTRY TO DOVE ST. PER TRAFFIC GMS N �Q 73 MARK DATE FIEVISIONS INITIAL Q � Q SITE PLAN �� my uo J� r C 55 AVIS QUICK TURN AROUND FACILITY � �� 4201 BIRCH ST JOHN WAYNE NEWPORT BEACH, CA AIRPORT N a SITE ' Q ' -s• B ' °� ��� �o�, An Employee-Owned Company B s � ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. '�!y} ��• Et- �INQ ENVFIOIWAEN'TAL. BEFivK�B 0Q- 1137 NORTH McDOWELL BOULEVARD PETALUMA CA. 94954. (707) 765-1660 NORTH JOHN W. JOHNSON, ARCHITECT JAMES H. RAY, CIVIL ENGINEER RHL REVIEW INITIAL DATE DATE: 21APR95 PRELIMINARY BDH 4/10/95 " VICINITY MAP PLANNING DR. BY N M 2 STEEL BID O O) A NO SCALE BLDG PERMIT APPR,: A z GENERAL BID RHL / 9332.20 A V/S c� z z • PERMIT REVS Q-� SHEET. . _ corlsTRucnoN Do not use drawing for constructionIr 1 O ' unless initialed 1 2 3 4 5 45 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 . 17 18 4 M PREFINISHED METAL M L` a FASCIA, PAINT LIGHT GREY t ° 98 -4 —VENTILATION io LOUVERS oe A H 22'-0" 22'-0" 12'-0" 10'-10" PREFINISHED METAL PANEL WALL, PAINT LIGHT GREY L ` f 1 L__� r-1 L_� r1 �R L_� r-1 500 GAL. WINDSHIELD LJ J LJ LJ al !-I LJ I FLUID & MOTOR OIL IL WNDSHIELD FLUID �_, L J L J , CANOPY/SERVICE STORAGE BLDG. ELEVATION L_J L_J WATER _J LUBE CUBE TANK n L� CJ L OVERHEAD REELS �+�� VACUUM 5 H.P. �a I ii \ii (� OF 5) & FLUIDS COMPRESSOR : II RUDD" LOW BAY 400 WATT 11 II STORAGE " " K O II METAL HALIDE FIXTURE II II o K 00 I � (TYP. OF 6) °p' TWO (2) VACUUM N II II DROPS (TYP.) II N DUAL HOSE, SINGLE �I�� ilk; I PRODUCT FUEL TWO (2) 10 H.P. VACUUMS DISPENSER (TYP. OF 4) WITH MUFFLERS EXHAUSTED f � THRU ROOF IDo I r L J L J L J L ELEC. PL. � o en o ---- I J w- � J CANOPY FASCIA ABOVE "�' O I I "ELSCO" CANOPY FIXTURES ........ �.- . MODEL UCL-400-SMH 400 WATT SUPER METAL HALIDE ' LIGHT FIXTURE (TYP. OF 8) H CANOPY SERVICE STORAGE BLDG. PLAN Z �m ELEVATION ELEVATION H 3 1/8 t►=,,_on 4 ,/$,._,0_o» i F F I I 1*7 C ` I I CARWASH BAY I r I I LJE ) I tD E . I ' It Li Q I 1-111000 E 0 I I SOUTH ELEVATION I I 6 � I MEN ® WMN I � _ I TOILET- ® TOILET I MA►wc cwm FIEV010NS NMA�. v I ® O I l `� I LOCKERS LOCKERS I 0 FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS o c I I Ams QUICK TURN AROUND FACILITY ' LO I I o 4201 BIRCH ST VEST. I ;� PREFINISHED METAL FASCIA NEWPORT BEACH, CA PAINT LIGHT GREY t4 I OFFICE I BREAK RM. I o a. PREFINISHED METAL WALLS a I I--JI N PAINT LIGHT GREY ` - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J An Employee-awned Company B B ' 71 00 381-8" REF. ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. O NORTH AFtcHn'ECTURE E1NV�AE r.AA_ 8ERYK 8 N 1137 NORTH McDOWELL BOULEVARD PETALUMA CA. 94954 (707) 765-1660 JOHN W. JOHNSON. ARCHITECT JAMES H. RAY, CIVIL ENGINEER FLOOR PLAN AST ELEVATION (WEST ELEVATION SIM.) wIMI , ,,,�,.- oA►TE DATE. 26APR95 V/S ` PRELIMINARY 8DH 4/10/95 N 5 '/4>. ,/_on all /Qr /_Or -_ DR. BY: VV V VV PLANNING M STEEL BID 0) O A► BLDG PERMIT APPR.: A Z RHL / 9332.20 GENERAL BID PERMIT REVS Z r CONSTRUCTION SHEET -� Do not use drawing Q for construction unless initialed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ? _. 18