HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/25/2010 - Study SessionCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
City Council Minutes
City Council Study Session
May 25, 2010 — 3:30 p.m.
I. ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Curry , Council Member Webb , Council Member Gardner , Mayor Pro Tem
Henn., Council Member Selich, Council Member Daigle
Absent: Council Member Rosansky
H. CURRENT BUSINESS
1. CLARIFICATION OF ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
Regarding Item #8 (Energy Efficient Streetlight Improvement Project), Council Member
Gardner asked staff to provide her with the total amount of cost savings that the LED
streetlights will yield.
2. OVERVIEW OF LIBRARY S EUREKA GRANT PROJECTS /PRESENTATION
OF LSTA $10,000 CHECK.
Mayor Curry announced that City Manager Kiff is serving on jury duty and will join the
meeting as soon as possible.
Library Services Director Cowell introduced Library staff, briefly explained the funding
process for employees to attend The Eureka Leadership Institute, and presented a
check from the Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA).
Librarian III/Web Services Hansen showed a PowerPoint that provided an overview
of The Eureka Leadership Institute's program.
Council Member Rosansky arrived at the meeting at 3:37 p.m.
Library Assistant Cots. discussed the project she is working on for The Eureka
Leadership Institute. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Henn's question, she stated that
she works hands -on with teens.
Children's Librarian Hart discussed the project she is working on for The Eureka
Leadership Institute and explained new cell phone features that the library will soon
offer.
Mayor Curry thanked the Library staff for their hard work and dedication
3. CHARTER UPDATE COMMISSION REPORT.
Marian Bergeson, Charter Update Commission Chairperson, provided a summary of
their 17 recommendations which includes: clean.un: those matters in which the Charter
or Initiative Measure is inconsistent with the existing law; modernization and
efficiency: those matters in which the Charter is not consistent with the current
Volume 59 - Page 479
City of Newport Beach
City Council Study Session
May 25, 2010
municipal practice and efficiency in government can be achieved through
modernization; and poli cy: those matters in the Charter that may warrant a review and
update for policy reasons. She commended the Charter Update
Commissioners, staff, Council Liaisions, and the City Manager for their hard work and
input. She stated that each recommendation was studied in detail and considered under
a City Council/City Manager form of government. She discussed the Civil Service
Board system and oil drilling recommendations, and emphasized the importance of
using clear language on the ballot.
In response to Council Member Gardner's question, Assistant City Manager
Wood clarified that the proposed locations to reduce oil drilling sites to about 5% of the
existing drilling sites are comprised of two existing City sites plus one site on Banning
Ranch.
Mayor Pro Tem Henn stated that the Civil Service Board would only be involved in the
review and advisement of Civil Service issues, as opposed to other staff issues.
In response to Council Member Webb's question, Chairperson Bergeson stated that
after investigating, the Commission concluded that the money given to the Chamber of
Commerce by the City is not used for political or lobbying activities. Council Member
Webb expressed support for the second alternative for P3 of the Charter Update
Commission's recommendation.
In response to Council Member Daigle's question, Mayor Curry stated that the Charter
Update Commission is proposing that the change in procedure relating to the sale of
City property will still allow the public to have the opportunity to vote on the sale of
City property.
In response to Council Member Gardner's question, Chairperson Bergeson stated that
the Charter Update Commission did not recommend a change to the appointment of
Council Members when there is no election because they believe the current system
is working fine as it is.
Mayor Pro Tern Henn commended the citizens for providing significant contributions to
the project.
Mayor Curry thanked the Charter Update Commission and stated that the item will
come back to Council for further discussion and approved recommendations will be
placed on the ballot in a form to be determined. He noted that the work of the Charter
Update Commission will help the City save money, be more efficient, and provide for an
effective government.
In response to Council Member Selich's question, Mayor Curry stated that some of the
ballot measures may be consolidated prior to being placed on the ballot.
4. BUDGET OVERVIEW.
Administrative Services Director McCraner showed a PowerPoint that provided an
overview of the budget process, City fund structure, City Charter budget
provisions, monthly schedule, types of funds, revenue budgeting, Transient Occupancy
Tax (TOT), principal property taxpayers, expenditure budgeting policies, Fiscal
Sustainability Plan, expenditure summary, 2010 -11 budgeted positions, special
financial reserves, balancing the General Fund budget, pending issues, recurring
Volume 59 - Page 480
City of Newport Beach
City Council Study Session
May 25, 2010
Council grants, and budget goals for 2010 -I1.
In response to Council Member Daigle's question, Administrative Services
Director McCraner stated that the Office of the City Attorney is taking on more work
and is outsourcing less. Council Member Daigle stated that the number of employee's
in the department needs to be justified and requested that a workflow analysis be
provided that outlines what each employees' tasks.
Mayor Curry directed the City Manager to work with the Office of the City Attorney in
preparing an overview of the department and requested that it be presented to
Council at the June 8 meeting.
In response to Mayor Curry's question, Administrative Services Director McCraner
stated that she is working with Acting Assistant City Manager Perkins on a
Performance Based Budget Plan. She explained the process and stated that she will
discuss it with the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and Finance Committee
prior to bringing it to Council.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Henn's question, Administrative Services Director
McCraner stated that it is not staffs intent to draw money from the reserves, if at all
possible.
In response to Council Member Daigle's question, Administrative Services Director
McCraner stated that the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects that are not re-
appropriated or completed, become a budget savings and the money is returned to the
General Fund. Public Works Director Badum stated that staff is currently working on
closing additional projects to allow opportunities to return more money into the Fund
accounts.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Henn's question, Administrative Services
Director McCraner stated that the Council Policy requires that all Internal Service
Funds that are surpluses above the amount that Council has approved are amortized
over a five -year period. She clarified that the pension investment rate assumption has
not been changed at this time and noted that she did not know when it will increase.
In response to Council questions, Assistant City Manager Wood stated that the Special
Events Advisory Committee (SEAL) will be viewing grants given to organizations and
noted that only two grant applications for next year have been received so far.
Mayor Curry stated that Council will need to examine the total sum of funds
given to organizations as part of an overall analysis. He stated that they will also need
to evaluate the value of the events and their importance in maintaining the fabric of the
community.
Council Member Webb suggested that the mooring fees be increased as soon as possible
to cover the charges to the City by Harbor Patrol. Administrative Services Director
McCraner stated that staff is evaluating CPI adjustments until appraisals are done and
noted that a cost for service study is currently being conducted. Mayor Pro Tem Henn
stated that the Finance Committee discussed moving more quickly in regards to
mooring fees and he hoped for a rapid conclusion. Mayor Curry agreed that the User
Fee process needs to move quickly, commended staff for their efforts in closing the
budget gaps, noted that the budget needs to be balanced without removing funds from
the reserves, expressed satisfaction with the partnership approach that the Fire and
Volume 59 - Page 4 81
City of Newport Beach
City Council Study Session
May 25, 2010
Lifeguards Associations have taken, and suggested that the City produce a long range
plan for future budget issues.
Mayor Pro Tem Henn commended staff for the progress made and expressed concern
about the way the budget is portrayed. He believed that there is considerable risk in the
proposed budget, in that the City is taking full credit for an optimistic view on the
revenue side and also believed that the City is not past the disappointment stage. He
stated that he will be interested in the progress made on the pending issues and on the
appropriate revenue side so the City does not have to take $2.5 million out of Operating
Reserves.
5. CIP PRESENTATION.
Deputy Public Works Director Webb showed a PowerPoint that included information on
the Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) completed in FY 2009 -10, current CIP work in
progress, CIP history, and the CIP program survey.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Henn's question, Deputy Public Works Director
Webb clarified that Balboa Boulevard is in the Pavement Management Plan. He stated
that more money will need to be added to the Pavement Management Plan because the
City will be required by the Orange County Transit Authority (OCTA) to keep the
pavements at a certain condition index.
Mayor Pro Tem Henn asked staff to come back to Council with a menu of alternatives
or a list of suggestions that would allow the City to utilize funds from another budgeted
item to get the Wayfinding Sign Program completed.
In response to Council Member Gardner's question, Assistant City Manager Wood
stated that she believed that there was confusion about what was going to be
implemented for the pilot program.
In response to Council Member Daigle's question, Deputy Public Works Director Webb
stated that the Sunset Ridge Park project that was approved has the traffic signal
included and believed that Caltrans will approve the signal. Council Member Rosansky
stated that the project will come back as a budget item and that the traffic signal can be
discussed at that time. Council Member Webb stated that the traffic signal is an
extremely important element for the public's safety and a key element for having safe
access to the park.
In response to City Manager Kiffs question, Deputy Public Works Director Webb stated
that the Tsunami Project is going well, they are still working on installing the sirens,
and are waiting for a license from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for sound
approval.
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
IV. ADJOURNMENT - 5:29 p.m.
The agenda for the Study Session was posted on May 19, 2010, at 8:40 p.m. on the City
Hall Bulletin Board located outside of the City of Newport Beach Administration
Building.
Volume 59 - Page 482
City of Newport Beach
City Council Study Session
May 25, 2010
City Clerk
1
Recording Secretary
Mayor
Volume 59 - Page 483