HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA1140..'.Mail1ng Addres",2300Universit,y Drive
:~pe:rtl'0-"""..Newport Costa Mesa YMCA'
··.·Ml!l.itin"Address 2300 Ofliven ity Drive
Newport Beach,CA 92§§L _
II
I
I
>',~'-:-:',-::;::--
ilppu<:ant (prill'.:)Newport-Costa Mesa YMCA -Jim de BoomPhon"--,6",4...2.::.~9""9",9,,,Q _
Phone.,642-9990
Newport Beach,CA 92660!--_.-
.'Present Use YMCA'Athletic Facili.!L._
n
An "'Jent Illi!ly '"dgn for the owner if written "uthor~.•"tion fro...the
n"or&OWl'let'b ..Hl<i1d with tlMI llwUCliltJml.
_______________________""'_--__---__>40 ,'..,-.......---,.,.__-__00_--__..__."___""_""_~...,_
~---...._"'------~-~--------_._-
i'tl0Un<,!Oat"_.______~il Oat"'••.._•
...•."':c.l\ction~~ib<.,,'A ",_._.__..
':'t·,..~1 __._._.C.C.ll,u.dn'l__
.l\otion ._
Date
--_._-
Dat":.....•
!'lanning l"ly 9,
Agenda Item Mo..~~~_
CITY OF NE'WORTBEACH
TO:
'PROH:Planning Department
SUBJECT,A.Use Permit No.1128 (j\J!tended)(Publ it:1f2:,~_I,L:"21
Request to amend a previously approved UB(o p~rlTlit which
permitted the establishment 0f a YMCAf~cility I,n the
R-l District.The proposed amendrn~n.t involv~g a
request to construct a 44,564±sq.ft.ndr1ltiQn that
includes y~uth and family fitness faciliti~~,a gymrlas-
tics center,a child care center,offices,a c~Jnity
rne~ting center and an illuminated roof t()!.J joqging/ex-
ercise area.Toe proposal also includes ~modificatior
to the Zoning Code so as to allow:a fY:irtion of the
propo~;cd building,an enclosed trash ar(!£j.Mld .'1 6 foot
high wall to encroach into the required 20 foot front
yard setback;a portion of the required parkIng spaces
to be cor.tpact spaces;and to allow t'.tiO •..ad 1 mounte~
identification signs ir:excess of 2 sq.ft.
AND
B.Variance No.1140 (Public Hearing)
Request to allow alterations and additions to the
eXisting YMCAfacility which will exceed th ..maximum
al:l.owable building height in the 24/28 Foot Height
Limitation District.
Parcel No.1 of Parcel Map No.3-35 'R~subdivision No.
215),located at 2300 University Drive.on the north-
erly side of University Drive.easterly of ~Jstin Ave-
nue in the West Bay Area.
ZO!IE:R-l
APPLICANT,Newport Costa Mesa YMCA
,MNER,Same as applicant
Applications
These applications involve a request to amend a previously approved
us",permit whichP<'>!1llitted the establishment of s YMCAfacility in the
R-l District.The proposed amendment involves a request to construct
a 44,5641 sq.ft.addition ~atincludes .youth and h ..Uy fitness
fa",iH.ties ,s,9Yl11nl!llltics.cenwr,schild .carec<lnwr ,,,,ffices,a
'l'O :COMmission -2.•
~omrnunity meeting cen~er and an illuminated roof top jogging/exercise
area.The proposal ~lgo includes:a variance to allow th~~lt~rations
and additi.ons to exceed the maximum allowable bUilding hrdqnt in t.he
24/28 Poot H~ight LiMitation District;a modificatinn to tht~Zoning
Cocte so as to <1110 ....a portion of th~proposed bUilding;ar,enclosed
":rash area It:1d a 6 hiqh foot wall to encroach int.o the r"-"1uirerl 20
foot front yard setback;a portion of the requir2d parkinq spaces to
be compact ~paces:and to allow two wall mounted identificntion signs
in e>:Cf':oBRof 2 sq.ft.Use:permIt procedures are Sf~t fcrth In Chapter
20.80 and vf\riance procedures an'~et forth in Chaptr!T 2'0.82 of the
Ne~~rt 8eact Municipal Code.
Background
At its meeting of May S,1983,tht.!Planning Com."TliS8ion (Jpproved a
proposed expansion of the r~y.isting Newport Costa MeA:l.'IMCA (then
called the Orange Coast YMeA).Said action included th~"lpproval of
the following application9:
1\Acceptance of a Triiffic Study prepared PUTfWljflt to Chapter
15 ..c:0 of thr:>N~wport Ftt'ilch Municipal Code {"'t'r"rf).r:=Phasing
f)rdindnce'"and City Policy 5-1 (IIAdminiatrtjtiv~Guidelines
for :implementing tho 'rf t.I ff i c Phasing OrdifJanc:~"').
The proposal also included modifications to the Zoning Code
AD as to allow a portion of the propos~d building,a new
t.rash enclosure,and a six foot wall to encroach into the
required 20 foot front yard setback,a portion of the
required parking spaces to be compact spaces,and to allow
two wall mounted identification signs in excess of 2 sq.ft.
7.)Acceptance of an Initial Study and Negativ(!D~claration as
having been prepared in compliance with the California
Env.~.ronmen~al Qua]i ty Act (CEQA),the tlStat~CEQ1\,Guide-
linl.!s"and City Polie'l K-3.
3)Th~approval of an amen~~nt to Use Permit No~1]28 flO as to
allow the construction of a 44,564±sq.ft.addition that
included youth and family fitness facilities,a gymnastics
center,a child care center,offices,a community me\!tinq
center,and an illuminated roof top jogging/exercise area.
4)The approval of Variance No.1098 to allow a portion of the
proposed addition to exceed the maximum allowable height in
the 24/28 Foot Height Li~itation District.
In accordance with Sections 20.80.090,20.81.090,and 20.82.090 of the
Municipal Code,UBe permits,modifications and variances automatically
expire after 24 months from the effective date of approval if a
bUilding permit has not been issued prior to the expiration date and
sUbsequently construction ill diligently p",Jrsued to cOlIIpletion.
Inasmuch as no building permits wore i$sued for the project within 24
months of thQ effective·(late of approval for UseE-emit No.1128
(/\mended),Variance No.1098 and related modifications,sdd applica-
tions expired on May 27,1985 (two years 21 day
TO:?l~ing Commission -1.•
'I'h~apprc'/I;>C!Traffic Study ':A'il1 E.>xpire on December 10,l'j[P "mless
p .....T!l''l]ts have not ~)~p.n i!'lsu,.~d anrl construct i0n begun on '!I'l p.r0P'o(Js(~d
dev(~j I}r;n;t_'nt prine to that da.t~.Attached [f)r the Pl,')tlIllr,fl CQr1'l1':1is-
:sion'!~inf0rmation is an ~xcerpt o~the Pli.onning Comnd~,rd',n mif.~lt(>c.
for U.s~Permit.:No.1128 {Amr·nded)and ·larianc~No.J!jrH~,rli3~('~]
April 23,1983 and May 5,1~8j.
Tn conjunction with the Planning Comrnis!=.:irm's consider-Himt of the
preViOtlfl Use Permit No.1128 (Amended)and Variance Nt).1()9B,an
r n 1.t i;;;1 Stuny was prepared and it wa!":>determined that th~proj-:,ct
wou l.d flot have a e igni ficant envi ronmental impact.Bi!ifi~d upon the
in formatic:1 f;ontaincd in the In i tia 1 Study and SUggCB tHI mi t j gat ion
m'?asures,t.he Planning Commis~1on accepted a Negative Declaration for
the previous project.
fnC\smuch as t.her~have b~~n no changes in the sub1oct:Pl:'"oj~ct and
further t.hat there are no significant environmental imp:v.:tf:T~st:ltinq
from the t::urrent project that '-'ere not considered j n nll~pr€'JiQUB
Initial Study,nn further envfronmo.nt.a!review is require,,)(It:thin
time!'and thf"prcvious accepted environrne~ntal document sh.,11 apply in
this ca8t'~.A (;opy of the previous envir-onrnental dOCUmf'.."nf;it~f1ttar.:hed
:or the:Planning Cormnission's information.
r:onfomance with the General Plan and the-Local Coastal Pn'Jqrarn
The Lund Use Elem(mt of the General Plan and the Local Constal Proqra'!i
designl.1t!:the site for "('.1OV'ernmental,Educational,and !nl?titutional
Facilities"uses.The existing YMCA complex on th~rrope~ty in
question falls within the us~"permitted.
Subject Property and Surrounding Land Uses
The Newport Coasta Mesa YMCA cOr.tplex is locat~d on th"site.The
<l?xiating development is constructed on a pad approximately 15 feet
above the adjoining properties.Tn the north9ast is the Anniversary
F.~tat~A Ringle family r.esidential development;to the southeast is an
afficf"complex;to the 90uthwc1;t,across the University Drive
right-of-wr1y,ts vacant property;and to the northwC'st,across a 28
foot wide alley,ill an attC1ched multi-fami.ly residential area.
Analysis
The applicant is now propodng to continue with the project and has
requested consideration of a n~w use perait and variance.The proj-
ect,an reflected in the new applications is identical to the previous
project approved by the Planning COJlllllissionon May 5,1983.Said
project consists of a 44,564±sq.ft.expansion of the oXisting 15,7691
aq.ft.'{MCA facility.The addition will include youth and family
fitness facilities,a gymnastics center,a child car~center,office",
•cO!!lI!\unity",eeting center and an illuJllinated·root top jog-
ging/ey.erciBc area.
The following outline ref1@cts the major characteristics of the
proposp.d.d'tvelo!~.nt'
COIlIOIission-4.
LOT srZE:175,677:1:sq.ft.
BUILDINGSET~£KS:RequiI.'ed PropoBed
Front:20 ft.min.8 ft.(at corner
of went addition)
Sides,4 ft.29 ft.and 47 ft.
Rear:10 ft.1I5t fto
BUILDABLEAREA:15B,351±sq.ft.
2 x BUILDABLEAREA,
(permitted in the R-l District)
316,702±sq.ft.
PROPOSEDGtlOSSSTRUCTURALAREA:60,333:1:sq.ft.
Existing Structure:
Ea"t Addition:
West Addition:
15,769 sq.ft
14,380 sq.ft.
30,184 sq.ft.
TOTAr.60,333 sq.ft.
FLOORAREARATIO:.38 x buildable area
PARKING:
Proposed:181 spaces (142 standard spaces,35 compact spaces,
4 handicapped spaces)
Required:See details below
BUILD:J:NGllEIG/lT'!!!!.~AVerage
Permitted:29 ft.24 ft.
Proposed:See details below See details below
proposed Encroachments into Required Front Yard Setback
The applicant is also requesting a modification to the Zoning Code so
as to pennit various .structural encroacl>.ments.into the required 20
footfrcmtya.rd·setback adjacent.to UniversityPrive.Said.encroach-
ments'include.a·.SlIIIlll.polO'tion of,,the westerly ,addition which en-
croachestowithin ,9 feet of the f·lO'ontproperty.line;.a.trash .e.nclo-
sure thatencroachell towith!n 6·feet of the •.front propelCtyllneJ!'nd
a ,,6 foot.hi9h wall,that,encroaches.to.wi thin ..,.8•feet ()fthe "front
property ·line.Staff bas .no .objections ,to.·.theprOJ?Osed ..jtncroacblilentll
ina"'!'Ucb alltheyue winor in ,nature and.will not.bl.ockany,views fromadjacentproperties.
TO:C""""i~~i(')n -5.•
Pr~posed Identification Logos
Two SO±sq.ft.logos depictinq a "y"are p!"0PO::';l';dt.o r;r~lnstctlh'd on
thp front and westerly Ride walls of the west additiorl of ".he faci~ity
'Wherr~only a 2 sq.f+.ident'ification gign is permit:t~d ~r;thf?:<-1
District.Staff f~~ds that tne prcposad siqr.::;a!'e rear;rA',lLlro fr-.r th,"
institutional use on the site.H"wl?ver,staff feels t:hiif"+;hr>5ir.,n!1
should not be illuminatedl so as to be mor~comPlJ~H.Jp to thn.
adjoining residential uses to the northwest of the sit~.
Gymn.,sium Sheet 4A,Section A &B f/aries ·0 ft.-
35 ft.to top
of parapet.
Variance Request
The applicant is again requesting approval of a varianr:~~00 as to
allow c portion of the proposed addition to exceed the maximum allow-
able height in the 24/28 Foot Height Limitation District.As showr,on
the attached elevations and !=\cctions,the highest ;:>oytion of the
proposed west ::addition will be the par~pct walla around the-rooftop
joggin'1/excrcise area.The maxirlll.lm height of t.his portiotl of the
structure is 1St ft.above existing grnde (see Section B on Sheet No.
A-4 of thn attached plans).Other portions of th~prr;p')f":"(l ndditions
'Will exceed the maximum permitted heiqht a:~well.T!'),)(;;::;int the
?lann1ng Commission in identifYing these areas on the >~'Jhmi U:f:'d plans,
!';taff has prepared the following table which sets forth lht'!'!ari0Us
h'Jilding heights and the corresponding locati()fj-;')f €<lch p{'.>rt1on of
the building as shown on the attached plans.
Portion of Building Sheet No.
Multi-Purpose Room Sheet 4A,Section A 28%ft.to top
of parapet;
30 ft.(average)
to midpoint of
insulated sky-
lightR.
Racketball Courts Sheet 4A,Section C 28%ft.to top
of parapet.
The Zoning Code requires that in order to grar,t any variance,the
Planning COJ11ITllssionmust find that the applicant has est.ahlished the
grounds for ..variance set forth in Chapter 20.82 (Sect inn 20.82.020
of the Newport Beach Municipal Code),
1.That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applying to land,bUilding or Use referred to in the appli-
cation,which circumstances or conditions do not apply
generally to land,buildings and/or Uses in th4 ".dis-trict.•
TO,COOIIltlssion.-6.
2.That the granting of the application is necesury for the
preservation and enjoymen~of substantial property rights of
t.he applicant.
3.That the granting of such application will not"under the
circumstances of the particular case,b~materV,,11y
detrimental to the health,safety,peace,c~1mfcrt,mnd
general welfare of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of the property of the applicant and will not
under the circumstances of the particular caM b""'<'lteridly
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to pl'Op<>rty
improvementsin the neighborhood.
Ap'0licant's Statements of Support
The applicant has submitted the following statements In support ofthisapplication.
Hardship invohed?
The property is irregularly shaped and alignment of new expansion
with existing facility requires one corner of the qymnas1.u.mto
project into front setback.The present R-I zone is somewhat
unreasonable in its application to an ir.etitutional building,
especially regarding building height.
What exceptional circumstances apply to the property?
The required dimensions and height of a regulation size gymna.ium
are extraordinary to the use of this property and do not apply to
other R-I zoned properties and other properties in the vicinity •
•Whyis a variance necessary to preserve property rights?
..'l'he h"iqht and front setback encroachment cannot be reduced in
size .without destroying the integrity cf the proposed Use.
~lithout the deVelopment of these facilities the YMCAprogram
~ould not offer the types of progr~s required to sustain itself.
It is s~aff's opinion that the requested height variance is both
reason~le and warranted inaSMuchas the proposed additions could
not reasonably be placed on other portions of the property
without I11so el(ceedinqthe allowable height limits.It should
also be noted that.tha required dimensions and heights.of a
regUlation si2.e9YJllriasium.are extraordinary .to the use of .this
property and do not·apply.to adjacent parcels.The proposed
structure is also located at least 47 feet from the westerly side
property l~ne and the.adjacent residential dev<!l<')pmentto the
northwest is separated from the site by an eXisting alley..,'.....,".---.'-.'"-,'-..
Off-Street.Park~
The Municipal Code has no specific parleing requireoaents for insti-
tutions A1mllar to the YMCA.If each space within the·expanded
tacili ty WErrllcalculated on an individUAl ba.ds,.apprOXUllltely 350·
parkin9'spacelll .woulc1be requIred •.~ver,baH40n inforJilllt:1011.f_.•,,,.c':;',...",-,.;'.-».•/>,••;::..".:.;,.',:,":,"-,-,',-:.'','.',:',.','on"._;.;',,-...Co"..,••',"",.
~~e YMCA ztaff,the gymnasium,~ffices,the rnulti-r~rpos~room,and
other facilities will never be occupied to maximum occupan~1~~at the
same time.
!n conjunction with the consideration of the 1983 applieQt ion cf Use
Permi.t No.1128 (Amended)"the YMCA staff had subr.!itttJr1 a rather
extensi ve parking survey for the eXisting-faci Ii ty.'nw"park ing
survey indicated that the maximumnumber of cars park.ed lat att hourly
average occupied at the noon hour,was approximately S6 dut~m~bi~eg.
Although these parking figures are over four years old,thn YMCA staff
have indicated that its mel!l.bership has remained relatlvely the saroe
since 1983 and thAt the previous parking demand for the facilIty has
not changed signifi<::antly.Staff has recently visited th..3fte on
several occasions"including visits during the noon hour,and it 1s
our opinion that the figures included in the previous parking stud}.
are reasonably representative of the current parking situation on the
~ubject property (see attached copy of 19B3 parking study).
f,S shown on the attached mite plan,the applicant is proposing 181
on-site parking spaces in conjunction with the propo3ml mtp:;lns!on.
Said parking plan includes 142 standard spacen,35 comp~ct ~pnces and
4 handica.PIJed spaces.1'hle is the same n~er of por.k 1rJq spaces
previously approvPd by the Planning Commission.The Clt,.y Traffic
Engineer has indica tad all additional handicap parking space be
provided on-site.He has also suggested that the Propos'''l compact
parking spaces be redistributed within the parking lot to his
satigfaction.
It is staff's opinion that the nul!l.b"r of parking spacea is adequate
for the proposed expansion,provided that the applicant lI\onitors its
programs in the YMCAso as not to exceed the capacity of the parking.
The nul!l.ber of compact spaces (19\)is also consistent with the other
similar requests that have been approved by the Planning Commission.
Specific Findings and Recommendation
Section 20.80.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code provides that in
order to grant any use permit,the Planning Commission shall find that
the establiRhment,maintenance,or operation of the use or building
applied for will not,under thc circumstances of the particular case,
be detrimental to the health,safety,peace,morals,co"'fort,and
general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of
such proposed use or be detrimental or injuriou3 to property and
improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of t.he City.
Staff recollllllends the approval of Use Permit No,1128 (/\mended)and
Variance No.1140 and suggests that the Planning Commission take such
action,with the findings and subject to the cO'lditions set forth in
the attached Exhibit "A".
PLANNIllGDEPARTl·1EN'!'
JAJ.IES rEWI<.:XER,Dire
TO:c""",bsion -8.
Attachments.exhibi1:-A-
Vicinity Map
Information submitted by the Applicant
Parking Study
Pr~vlOUGly accepted Environmental DocUMent
Excerpts of the Planning Commission Minutes
dated April 21,1983 and May 5,1993
Plot Plan,Floor Plans,Elevations and S~ctionm
EXHIBIT "'1\.
FINDINGS AND CONOIT!Of>1S OF APPRG~l".I.
!'Oil USE PERl4IT00.1128 (AMEllDF'LI
AND
V~~IANCENO.1140
A.Use Permit No.1128 lAz.ended)
FIlll>IIIGS:
1.That the proposed use is consistent With the t.01I:10
Use El .......nts of the GeMr"l Plan and th..Local
Coastal Program,and is compatible with surround-
ing land UseR.
2.That the propased number of COMpact car.spaces
constitutes 19 percent of the perking requirements
which is within limits generally accept.ed by the
Planninq Ccmmission relative to pre"Jim.ui similaz-
applications •
3.That the proposed use of compact pary.~llg space-g,
the front yard encroodment5 and prop'j~(1od 1.dent i-
fication siqt".s will not,under the c1rcummt ..mr.::es
of the this particular ca~e.be det.ri~nt.l to the
heal th,safety,peace!,c<mfort.,It'1d general
welfare of persons residing or working in the
neiqhborhood of such proposed une or b<l detri-
mental or injurious to pro[J'!rty and improvement"
in the neighborhood or the genera 1 weI fare of the
City and furtl'er that the propos ..d roodification"
are consistent with the legislative intent of
Title 20 of this Code.
4.That the'project.will """,,ply with aU <lpplicable
City and"State Building Codes and Zoning require-
Lents for new building applicable to the district
it:which ~.he proposed project i"located,except
those items requested in conjunction with the
proposed modifications.
5.That the project lot size conforms to the Zoning
Code area requirements.
6.That ..<lequat..off ·"treet parking and related
vehicular circulation are being proVided in
conjunction ·with thE'proposed development.
7.That all dqnificant envirolllll<!ntal concerns for
theproposedcprt'ject have !><Ien addressed in a
previouf'ly'eertifi",d·..n'firorllMntal document,and
further,·that are·no additional reaso,.able
should !><I
TO,
>~
~nning Commission -10 ••
8.That based on the information contain(>o in the
previous Initial St,udy and Negative Declaration,
the project incorporates suffici0nt rnJtlgation
Measures to redu~e potenti~lly significant en-
vironmental effects,and that ~~~proje~t will n0t
result in siqnificant environmental impl1rtr{.
9.That thp.approval of Use Permit Uo.11L~(Atr,Imdll1d)
wi 11 not.under the cirClll'!!stances of th J"CIUW bf'
detrimental to the health,safety,Pf'it1'-::,."moraIn,
comfort and general welfare of perBon~residing
and working in the neighborhood or be <l~trl"",ntal
or injuTiou~to property or impr'ovenwHit q in the
neighborhood or the general welfare of tJlt!'City~
CONDITIONS:
1.That development nhall be in substantt ...f1 confor-
mance with the Approved plot plan,floor plans,
elev"Itinna and sections,excppt as TlOt.,.,,}helow.
2.That all
shall be
adjoining
mechanical
screened
properties.
equipment and tranh areas
from University Drive and
3 _That all improvem'-nts be constructed de;required
by Ordinance an~the Public Works Department.
4.That vehicular access be providea to the eXisting
stonn drain eaSf!Ment access road located at the
northnasterly corner of the parcel to the satis-
faction of the Public Works Department.
5.That the on-site vehicular and pedestrian circu-
lation systems be subject to further review by the
Public Works Department,including the design of
the proposed service driveways.
6.That prior to the ~ccupancy of the proposed
project!the circulation system it':'lprovements
described in the Traffic Study dated April.1983
on Paqe 10 preparf!d by JEF Enqinp.~rinq,Inc.,
shall have been accomplished unless subsequent
project approvals reqUire modifications thereto.
(The ultimate design ot the intersection shall be
subject to the approval of the City Tra.fic
Engineer)•
7.That the existinq deteriorated drive apron and
gutter on the University Drive trontag..be re-
placed under an encroachment permit iSDued by the
Public Work.Department.
TO,COlIIIliBsion-11.•
8.That pribr to the issuance of a.building ~rndt,
the applicant shall demonst:rate to th,..flat;i afac-
tion of the Planning Department and th~Public
Works Department,that eewer faciliU"'r;will bt,
available for the project at thfo Uw·"f n,'r'll'"
pancy.
13.The grading permit shall include,if required,a
description of haul routes,access points to th(!o
site,watering,and sweeping program de-signed to
minimize impact of haul operations.
(.....That arrangements be made "'i th the J-ljbJ it;W(.Jr~g
Department to guarantee satisfactory c~~rl~tlon of
the public improvements.
10.That a master plan of sewer,water and storm drain
faclli ties be prepared and approved by the Public
Works OC9artment prior to issuanc~of any building
permits.
11.Development of site shall be 5ubjc~t to a grading
permit to be approved by the Building and Planning
DepartmentP.
12.That a grading plan,if required.ah ..:d 1 in(""lude a
complete plan for temporary a.nd peJ"l!\,lnr~nt.drainage
facilities,to minimize any potential imparts frv~
silt,debria,and other water pollut~ntB.
14.An erosion,siltation and dust control plan.if
required,shall be submitted and be suhject to the
approval of the Bu ilding Department and a copy
"hall be forwarded to the California Regional
Water Quality Control BO&rd,Santa Ana Region.
15.The velocity of concentrated run-off from the
project shall be evaluated and erosive velocities
controlled as part of the project design.
16.That grading shall be conducted in accordance with
plans prepared by a Ci vll Engineer and based on
recommendations of a 80il engineer and an enqi-
neering geologist subsequent to the completion of
a comprehensive soil and qeoloqic investigation of
the site.Permanent reproducible copies of the
"Approved as Bull t"grading plans on standard size
sheets shall be furnished to the Building Depart-
ment.
17.That erosion control measures shall be done on any
eXpOsed slopes within thirty days after grading or
as approved by 'the Gradinq £ngineor.
TO:COIIZission -12.•
lB.A landscape and irriqation plan fcr the project
Rhall be prepared by a licensed l.~r>dn-(;.'l~~rchi-
tect.Thp.landscape plan shall i~·n~r~te and
phase t.he installation of landsc-:spJ n'l with th,.,
proposed construction Gchedule.q'rlf,r to t.he
occupancy of any structure,the licenant1 landscap~
architect shall certify to toe Plannlflq fJnpartlMont
that the landscaping has been install~~in accor-
dance with the prepared plan).
19.The landscape plan shall be subject tIJ the:!review
of the Park!;,Beaches and Recrteatif)fi I~partment.
and approval of the Planning Department.
20.The landscape plan shall include a m"int~na.nce
program whi~h controls the use of fertilizers and
pesticides.
21.The land~cape plan shall place he.","!Htrlf)hasis on
the use of drought.-re!'listant nativ,,~'1Nftltation and
be irrigated with a system deGi'..;r'l~t1 to avoid
~urface runoff and over-watering.
22.The landscape-plan shall place heaor/"'mphasis on
fire-retardant vegetation.The finnl landscape
plan shall be designed so as to ir:t"nsify the
landscaping for screening purpose!:),ildjacent to
the Anniversary Lane Tract,and UJ 1ncr~aBe the
"'all and landscaping at the northwesterly corner
of the site where the foot traffic Is occuning,
60 as to prenlude persons from qaining "'CC~88 at
thio location.
23.Landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of
weeds and debris.All vegetation shall be regu-
larly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition.
24.That any roof top or other mechanical equipment
shall be sound attenuated in such a manner as to
achieve a maxim:.mt sound level of 5S dBA at the
property line.
25.That any mechanical equipment and e1Mrgency power
generators shall be screened fraD '.liav and noise
associated with said installations shall be sound
attenuated to a~ceptable levels in receptor areas.
The latter shall be baaed upon the recommendations
of a licensed enqineer or a professional engineer
practicing in acoustics,and be approved by the
Pl:ninq Department.
26.That all buildings on th"project site shall be
equipped uith fire s~ppre&sion systems approved by
the Fire Depar~nt.
27.That all acces~to the buildinq ~aprr0v~d by the
Fire DepartP1ent.
28.That:fire vehicular access,includinlJ ,.b,~propo~;n.d
planter islands,shall be appro·/ed 'iJ'I the r i re
Department.
29.Final design of the project shall provid~for the
incorporation of water-saving devices rur project
lavatories and other water-using facilities.
30.That the lighting system within the structure and
in the off-street parking lot shall be designed
and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the
light source and to minimize light 9pilla'1"and
glare to the adjacent residential uses.The plans
shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Elec-
trical Engineer;with a letter from th..Engineer
stating that,in his opinion,this requirement has
been ~t.
31.That the final design for the parking area be
approved by the City Traffic Engineer.
32.That a minimUlllof 181 parking spaces be provided
on-site at all times.
33.That the location of the compact parking spaces
shall be redistributoo within the parking lot to
the satisfaction of the.City Traffic EngiMer.
34.That five handicap parking spaces shall be pro-
vided .0n"'i1ite unless otherwise permitted by the
l3uilding Department •..
35.That a JlW(imUl!l.of.19\:1;.(35 space,,)of the parking
on-site lUy be compact p<lrking spaces.
36.That the service driveways shall be subject to
further review and apprOVal of the City Engineer
and City Traffic Engineer.
37.That no nighttilllGliqhting shall be permitted on
the runningtrack/exer~i$e area,except for pacing
light!>01).therunninqtra.:k.
38.Thatno·permanent ""pIified paqinq sy"tOllls shall
be permitted in any outdoor ar"a on the subjectproperty.
39.That the two proposed·';'''U·''lqns shall not be
illuminated.
TO:
40.It shall be the responsibility of th'1'"{MCA to
monitor its programs for the prop(,sed facility so
a~to not exceed the capaci ty of tht;proposed
parking lot.If it is determined by th"Planning
Departm#!nt that proqraDlS excell'Jd'thQ on-si te
parking spaces,they shall be modified hv the YMCA
in a manner approved by the Planning Dep~rtment.
41.That a gate shall be required across the driveway
to close off the parking lot during the non-busi-ness hours.
42.That this UFe permit shall expire unle ...exercised
within 24 month"from the date of approval as
specified in Section 20.80.090 A of th"lIewport8eachMunicipalCode.
Variance lIo.1140
PIllDIIlGS:
1.That there are excerc10nal or extraordinary
circumstances applying to the land.building.and
use proposed in this application.Which circum-
stance"and conditions do not geMrally apply to
land.bUilding.and/or uses in the SllIIIedistrict
inasmuch as the YMCA's gymnasium requires specific
dimensions and height that do not apply to adja-
cent properties in the vicinity.
2.Th!lt t!t~granting"of 'a variance to the height
requirementlSneeessaX'Y"for the pre""rvation end
enjoyment of substantial property rights of the
applicant,.irUi.lIIlSI1ChaswithoUt the height.the
YMCA eould hot"offer programs necessary to sustain
itself and serve the community.
3.That the e8tablishment.maintenance.and operation
of the use.property.and bUilding will not.under
the circumstances of the particular case,be
detrilll<lntalt6th~health.safety.peace,comfort,
and geheralwelfare of persons redding or working
in the neighborhOOd of such proposed use or
detrimental or injurious to property and improve-
IMnts'in the neighborhOod or the ,,"""ral welfareoftheCity.
CONDITIONS:
1.Thatdev"lopment shall be'in substantilll1
!l1lIncewi th the approved plot
That all applicable conditions of Use.Perm!\:110.
1128 (Amended)shall be fulfilled.
3.That the height of the parapet wan f,~hnll b~
limited to that required by Code,is 4.1.ifJGhl?S~
The propoEed stairwells shall be no Iii ;th~r !':han
the approved height of th~parapet wall"
II,
I
l!I'II,III
II
I L'I '~==--:-:-=-"
II 1_---n.
Iii,i'"!"i .,!,j
•I yl
I
I L__-,
II !
(I
Ii I III~II JAr ---=~-:-:-=::-::-I
II
II
I
I
"~~...III
Z,III,..,,0:
_..
Ii::,
~0
"-
..J.-"I-~'"O.d 0..I Wo,~'"nq ilLlfOA~"'1i~Nrm J:I§0 H~
wen
-i--
I,
I ~
I
iI,
I
!
~","...~-,,,.....~
ORANGE COAST YMCA
fACILITY EXPANSION
PROGRAM OEFINATION
The Orange Coast YMCA seeks to add 45.000 square feet to its existing 1&.000 square
foot facility which is located at 2300 University Drive,Newport Beach.Here beluw
are listed the program spaces along with program defination.
GYMNASUIM -primarly to house existing programs such as aerobic fltne,'which is
offered five times a day un the outdoor slab;ski fitness offered twice a week;
men's basketball offered twice a week at noon and other times court is vacant;
youth phyiscal education offered after school;'YBA leag"e for children currently
offered six days a week in afternoons.Gymnasuim would allow us to serve our pre-
sent ~mbers without concern for weather which causes class loss and income loss.
GYMNASTIC CENTEIl -would take the place of our lobby located mult}-purpose room
In which we offer movement education for children 3 months and older;gYlOIiastics
for older children;self defense,judo,Karate for adults;ballet and dance classesforchildrenandadults.
FOUR RACQUETBALL COURTS would allow the YMCA
and allow for more youth time on the courts.
and tournaments on a regular basis plus some
to retain more of it-,existin9 members
We would also be able to offer leagues
new programs such a,wallevbalI.
TWO NEW LOCKER ROOMS would allow us to provide seperate change room and shower
facilities for our existing members based on age and SeX.Currently women and girls
have one locker facility and men and boys have another.~eperate facilities for
each of the four groups would be provided.
WEIGHT ROOH this new ro.Offiwould replace the existing faci Iity which would be turne<l
into a maintance centerwIthshop equipment.The new fael lity WDuld house CAM I Iand0IympicweightroomequIpl11ent.
P.E.STORAGE &OFFICE SPACE would be used to house eXisting staff and store existing
equipment.Some new equipment for gymnastics would be requi"ed.
TWO P.E.AREA MEET IfiG ROOMS adjacent to the Gym and pool area would house meetings
of existing groups such as scuba classes.life saving classes,Healthy Back,lead-
ership training near the faci I ity of use rather than in the chapel or,red room.
MEW S FITNESS CENTER a new faei I ity for our 320 men Fi tness Center members whi Ie
.~men would use the existing facility.Both groups would have access to their
center while the YHCA Is open rather than on limited time basis.We would have a
shared exerc i se area and exerel se equi pment.
MULTI-PURPOSE ROOH for large group meetings that are often now held out doors or in
a stuffed lobby area.Room would also be available for AYSO,Boy Scouts,etc to USe.
KITCHEN to replace existing kitchen facility wIth large,more functional food service
preparation and service facility.We would be able to prepare meals and snacks for
group which we currently have to buy outside the V and have brought in.
FAMILY CRISIS CEHTER OffiCES to house existing staff which is currently located at
First Methodist Church In Costa Heu and·wll I result In a reductIon of in ~nd out
trips betw.flenthe existing facilities.Annual family case.load of.Center staff Is90fillllilies,..,
•page 2
HEETING ROOMS'STAFF OFFICES to house existing staff and to provid,additional
space for groups which currently meet at the YHCA.Currently our parent-child
proqram lebdership groups meet at the Y,often tighly scheduled around other meet-
ings In the same two rooms,i.e.healthy back class.
NURSERY AREA currently we provide care for 40-50 children each day in one of our
meetlrog rooms for parents who wish to have a work out or.participate in a YHCA
class.The nusery area would allow for more room for the children as well as an
outdoor play area.
The YMCA currently has over 12,000 member/participants on an annual basis partici-
pating In a variety of classes.organized programs and drop In activities.We see
addltitonal participants In such things as aerobic fitness classes,but basically
from our exlstinimemberShlp/particlpants.The new participants will generate In-
come to pay for acilities and staffing costs.
The amount of time that a person might stay at the YMCA would Increase as more
programs are offered,but we do not see the same person making more than one trip
per day to the YMCA.The av~rage length of stay would increas~from I hour to
1 hour 40 minutes.
The only facilities where we would have increase membership In are
current members proposed members
Men I s FI tness Center 330 4$0
Women's Fitness Center 150 450
The YMCA facilities are croWded ROW.per our members.If expansion is not done in
the next 12-18 months.our membership/participation ..ill drop frOO!the 12.000 mark
back to the mid-1970's number of 6 to 7.000 people annually.
TRAFFIC STUDY
DAILY LOG 01 RECTI ON 01 RECTI ONTYPEOFVEHICLEFROMCOINC
0'"wa:..'"w ..w C>0 0 0 0 '"..:...J z Z '"Z '"a:......w ..'":>...'".l-.I-0::O...J 0w:z:'"...J ...J '"...J ...J '":>:z:u z...w ..:II>II>II>II>0 ..:•I->..0::0:::c w:z::z:u '"w w ~w w ~C>W<...J ...J Z Z Z Z ...~>...J.....J <~<<:r ...J I->~...J ~>...J I-...""I-DATE 0 :>()0 a:.....0::w 0 >w 0u...l-I-0 0 I-<.......
TUESOAY.F,BP-UARY 15.1983 212 96 308 458 128 107 73 105 122 81 428 II;0
WEDNESDAY.FEBRUARY 16,1983 172 104 276 403 112 102 64 95 116 70 374i Ii 6
THURSDAY,FEBP-UARY 17,1983 230 121 351 M7 131 119 91 105 -125 95 480 II;2
FRIDAY,FEBRUARY 18,1983 146 105 251 31.8 II;86 71 75 101 71 Itlll!Ii 2••SATURDAy,FEBRUARY 19,1983 22 15 15 29 15 100 13/4 0
SUIjOAY,FEBRUARY 20,1ge3 20 13 38 '39 13 15 9 12 15 10 62 it 0
110NDAY,l'EBRUARY 21,1983 il2 72 184 238 71 66 49 57 67 62 356
.............-
I/,y .<0...,If 0 /I IJ
I!I,I\f,C'...,SI1I:l.,
6'10 I tD 3.:3.It i:_n.'I 10 (;
i:1<>If /()£"
t"""')./,5 /2 II
t>:~"7 '~"S
.,'"""7/7 Ie-/9
•
'1:,0 /7 5 ;;l,o II
10'.4 1<1 1'-Ie 1'1
10:10 6 /0 't 10
II :00 /1 17 /'1 /7
":10 7 ;to'7A.b.,;,...~l'i ,7 33 If
,1:10 77 go g-
J:(X)3 16?~o
,:ro ¢~/I J7
"'7,)6 6 r I'J.
"',.ft ",;
'';"',;l.:I.('1
.,:7'":r i2.t!I'7
'fw"10 (;.,'f
l(:P {d ,3 6 '7
(~'I 3 13 'I
6;10 /'S'g 3
..."f)f1''I 10 12,
6:1<>,r ¢"I ,'-.
,:.0 /'I B /6
7''''t ~IS"go
C'Qt,I I '(9~.~/;..IJ,&"ti'i·~n ...·1 ".7q~I'3;t '7
(,':1:0;-~;.,If I".....,··s 0",..";"~:)~.:"'4
II::.cJ.":.#lCf:J!(;a;~n.,,,/,"
,:~-:V'(I~-~-5 ....p':-t..t.L-_-"'-+,.!.-~~+-~~.~:,,-.}
S P ..~(17)::l..p 3 )..r ",
/.)'I ,6M),5 If S If.'s.~
'I ~€(17)7 I 3 9 S'.!'{.f
:>t .,1'1 (1'1),7..~;{;!"&05
"1 ~I {(,a)6 10 b ~(O 5.3
/0 ;1.0 17 us);I..).,I~.f(I 1'5,~16.'b
'7 '",o~3)I::l../)...I]..S.I"M;10.).,n../)..,ees'}/5 /0 'f t<''-10-
S 10 /0 ~5")II 6 go g'&.'i 'l,~
lr .,.IH31)Iq f>l?3 ~.'f ,••'(
I).ff 11f36)7 Cl 5 I 7 (.1'I to 35 $"j(./5',~~oS '~,.}...3"tot'j):)10 S -;to ,.~,.,
,At'B '~6';'J..'{'3 ~o f6 S /6."
5',5'5 :':.'1 ",;l.,,"P 3 II.,
"3 /0 qii,15 'J.<'fr P '.'7 C.,
7 7'6f/'!}(;6 5'~q.~'1.1(
It "7(1°)/0 t2.1'7 it 5.'1 '.1
g 7901>6'6 ~5:3 $'.1
;-I;L~~~'&.~'i ~'5:'1~.~
/'i 3 "Sf/ifll:jS .,:"1.'1).'1
q '"7 ,e(!Ji)1f h.'1 G.,'/./
~{;12,f!.5JIf>,3 /0 "".,6.'
7 15'"o~3')!(.3 /6 s.e 'PI
7 9·t I;l..e»!?7 I'J....c.~(J...
Id 7!~[~cJ.(!1j1f If 6.6 5.1{
A fr 7 ~7<,o .'I 6 3.6 b"
'l,'I t((:o~.,'ft 3 ;l...5-'/~'}..,.~1/5;'t /flJ /.ff 5.2...
Sj6 (7)f ri !5'•q 5.'
pfpl .7 ...•¢';·il P ,~.:l..
+~&1•.I::...,.;..".~+'f.~.llx·1f2>-0.J.I--·tS ·+-"'+·.....,"~+;.....,~'.7C'-i7~~~""'lf!~.:,.F7:..f·
•
6'''0
")~~
-"'10
~;"O
f<l<>
"t '00
'l !10
,O!Do'"'~"1/:#~
":~
1~(4"Aloe"!
/:l!'"
I '-de
"fJe
¢
¢
I11
6
!5'
3
65
6
I{.'"I
I
~~,,~
.,.,~G
~~ce
1'Jll
'1'-(1"
>l{:1fJ
S~()O'.r;,Q.,40
,t']"",
':00
'1'10
l?:oo
s'10~·oo
'1"30
Of!JP6G (OlIn CfI1(/(jRflrflC :>rIJ..Dy .-..~,.;~h?el'$·
56,II
si
SO
I.trII'q!f
~).
·"·,.
•
;,"I \I \
I "I \\
\
April n,1983
of New,nry,t Beach
MlNUHS
ROil CAli
INDEx
Traffic StooL (Public /learing)
Request to c-::>nsider a Traffic Study in CClfljlmction With
a 45,000 sq.ft.addition to the YMCA facility.
AND
Use Permit No.1128 (Amended)(Public Hearing)
Request to amend a previously approveG us"permit that
perlRitt<id the establishment of a YI'.cA flidHty in the
R-1 District.The proposed amendment i3 4 request to
construct Ll 45,000 :f:sq..ft.addition that includes
youth and family fitness facilities,Q qymnastica
center,a child care center,offices,q community
meeting center and an illuminated roof top
j099'inq/exercise area.The propos.-.l alst'.,l lncludes a
modification to the Zoning Code b'"iin to allow a
portion of the proposed bUildiny,all enclosed trash
area,and a 6 foot wall to encroach into the required
20 foot front yard setback,a portion of tho required
parking spaces to be compact spaces,and to allow a
wall mounted identification sign in exc",ss of 2 sq.
ft~)and the acceptance of an environment~J document.
AND
Variance No.1098 (Public Hearing)
Request to .allow"a:portion of the proposed add i.tion to
the Orange Coast YMCAto exceed the t1aximum allowable
height in the 24/28 Poet Height Limit.ation District.
LOCATION:Parcel No.1 of Parcel Map Ha.3-35
(Resubdivision No.215)ioc.t"d at 2300
University Drive,on the r.rJrtherly side
of University Drive,easterly of Tustin
Avenue in the West Bay area*
Items No.
7,8 and 9
ALL
COl4TIlWED
TO MAY
5,1983
ZONE:R-1
APPLICANT:Orange Coast YMCA,Newport Beach
OWNER:Same as applicant
April 21,1'383 MINUTES
City of Newport Beachrou.CAli
Agenda Itema No.7.8 and 9 wp.ze heilrd Cf'.)lwlJrT(1'l'.1 y.due to their rela.tionship.
The public hearing opened .In cGnnectj.cm wt t h th~!'H'!
items and Mr.James d~Boom,Executive DireCluc (tiC the
Oral\ge Coast YMCA.and resident:ot Ncwpof...itt H~'u}ch,
appeared before the Commission.Mr.d~Boom d«liv@r~d
a slide presentation which depicted the various
programs which are offered by the Orange Coast YMCA.
Mr.de Iloom stated that.the current facility contains
approxi .....t.ely 16,000 square feet which services
approxiJM.tely 13,000 F.ersons..He statri that the
objective of the proposed expansion i~to provid~
additional space to servt>its -=urCf2'nt ~mtJf~tr;mor('
adequately.He ntated that he has th~following
questions on several of the condition~listed in
Exhibit "A"for th~use permit approval:
Mr.de BoOla referred to Condition No~7.nela:ting to
the vehicula.r access to be prOVided to th~eXifiting
storr.t drain easement access road.and an:kf:d if the
eXisting parking spaces at this location will }~lost.
Mr.Donald Webb,City Engin~er.stated that vehicular
access to the atom dr«in is needed for rnaint.enance
purposes,but that the existing parkinq nf-sces wouldnot.be lost.
Mr.de Boom referred to Condition No..6,re::~at.ing to
the replace ....nt.of the det.eriorat.ed drive apron,and
stated that they feel t.hat.the responsibility lies with
£guidon which utilized heavy eqUipment on tho driveway.
Mr..Webb stated that the Public Works DepartJ1'lcntdoes
not care who replaces the drive apron and gutter,as
lonq as it qets replaced.
Mr.de Boom referred to Conditicn No..25,relating to
the fire suppression syst~mg,and asked uhat &9cncy has
control over the sprinkler system..Plannlnq Director
Hewick.er stated that the .r-'1 reo Depar~nthas lIiJthorlty
over the fire suppression systems to be utilized~
Mr..de Boom referred to Cond1ti0f}No.33,which
prohibits niqhtti ....lightinq on the runnJ.nq trackl
exercise area,and litated that they "r~d(~mirous 'of
installing knee-high ",..lk"",light.s around the insid"of the track ~
1t-lDEX
Hr.de Boom stated that they would liy.~to be able to
utilize the track area until 10:00 p.m.,at the latest.
Planning Director Hewicker stated that the staff was
concerned with the close proximity of th~t.rack area to
the surrounding residential area and the impacts which
the niqhttizle use of the track area ""-'1 ,"",e upon the
surrounding residential area.
Chairman King asked if it would be possible to pattern
the lighting On the track to not e"tend Ii.bove the
parapet wall.P!annin9 Director Hewicker Btated that
even if the lighting is patterned in au,,11a manner,
there will still be activity On the tea"k dUring the
eve:s~in9 hours,which may be o!f'!Jllgtve to the
surroundinq residential ares.
Planning Director Hewicker stated that during the
s .......r IlOnths,it remains li9ht untll 9:00 p.m.He
stated that d~ring the winter months,it qets dark much
earlier and is ...ch colder.Therefore,he stated that
the seasons can dictate how late in the evening the
track can be utilized,rather than installing nighttime
liqhting.
Mr.de Boom stated that the airport officials have
requested that a soft red light be iMtalled on the
top of the roof.Planning Director Hewicker stated an
aircraft warning liqht would be acceptable.
Mr.de Boom referred to Condition Uo.34,prohibiting
an amplified pa'Jing systl!l!l in any outdoor area.and
asked if a portable public address sy.tern would be
allowed for the Saturday Dl<'rningswim ""'er.s and during
the evening in the campfire circle.Planning Director
Hewicker stated that Condition No.34 could be modified
to read,"That no permanent amplified pe'l'1ing systems
shall be permitted in any outdoor ar~a on the subject
property ....
Hr.de E10011lreferred to Condition No.16,relating to
program monitorin9 of the proposed facility,and
sU9gested that the following wording b~in.erted in the
last sentenee,"the programs shall be modl,fi"d by t.he
YMCAin a manner approved by the Planning Department,"
Planning Director Hewicker stated that it is not the
Planning Department's intent to modify the programs of
the YMCA.
April 21,1983
t Beach
COM/INSSJO-B.S April 21,19tH MlNUHS
t Beach
Hr.de Boom referred to Page 4 of the ~t,l!f!r0p!:H't
which addre!'lses inconsistencies wi th tho,·"'p'prov~d
conditions of approval in conjunct.ioll «Ii 1.h thf~(~j('i st inq
development.He stated that th~masonry wall ~djaccnt
to the Anniverdary Lane tract was const nl,.:tf!d in 19tB
and was ",pproved by a City inspector.Ile stated that
the outdoor basketball court and playground is enclosed
by a 10 foot high fence.rather than a 5 f'JOt high
fence.He stated t~at the revolving doors to the pool
and the weather dome are stored in the outdoor storaqe
area.Chairman King stated that this area would be
replaced by the proposed expansion.
Mr.de Boomstated that the 4 foot high light standards
were continually being destroyed by chi,ldren on
bicycles.He statfltd that over a year iJqo,two of the
YMCAvolunteers fnntaj led the higher light standards
for safety and security purposes for the members.
Mr.de Boom reforred to Condition No.29,relating to
too lighting system.and stated that they will comply
with said condition.He stated that they are also
willing to comply with the landscaping conditions which
have .been recommended in the staff report.
In rasponse to a question posed by Chair~dh kinq~Mr.
de Boom stated that the four foot high light standards
have been un~ired and would be removed fo~the proposed
expansion;
Commissione~Ralalis asked Mr.de Boomif the YMCAhas
considered using sat.elite facili ties within the
community,rather than combining the proqr~s into onp
facility.Mr.de 800m stated tha~th~y have con»1dcred
the Gateli te conc(optI but the costs invol J i nq lartd"
additional facilitiel:i and staff have liot proven
feasible.
Commissioner Balalh state<l that the area located
around the OASIS facility or the Corona del Mar
elementary School site would be ideal for offering the
programs of the YMCA.Il~.de Boom shted that '.th,'y
have explored the Corona del Mar Elementnry School
site,but there does not appear to be sufficient
c....uni ty support.financially or progr"'"wi""..to
support thl!!'operation of a YMCAextension'at this
locat1.on.
April 21,1993
City of NeWOC:lrt Beach
MINUTES
ROU CAll
Hr.de Boom Btatf"d that the YMCAoffera orl-r;it.£:fitnesr;
proqraDtS for the e.ployees at ~e Ford Anronutr-onicn
complex and swimming instructions ~,dpartment
cnmplexes within the canmunity.He 6ti1t~1 t.hat thp.:
Orange COAst YMCA members are equally ';Jllit b(~t.....een
Newport Beach and Costa Mesa resider\t~,with the
balance of the IlM!mbers who are ern-'loye(f iT.tht!airport
area and reside in various cities.
In response to 4 question posed by Commissioner
Ba1a115,Mr.de Boom stated that thn facility is
generally utilized by the follO'..,ing groupe of persons
during a typical day:6:00 ~.m.to 9:00 ~.m.-~orking
adults;9;00 a.~.t.o noon hOU3Clo(lVJH:I./;nd senior
citizens;noon to 1130 p.m.local b\Jtd',~ssmen;late
afternoon children~!):oo to 7:00 p.M.working
adults1 and,7:00 p.m.to 10:00 p.m.-lo~nl residents.
In response to 8 question posed by Commissioner
8ala116,Mr.de Boom stated that the running track will
be constrlJcted with an artificial surface over
lightweight concrete.which will help to eliminate the
naiae.Cornmissionp.r McLau9hlln state.d that she is
concerned with the noise which will be g~nerated by the
perHons utilizing the runhi:--q trock,not.naccaSBr ily
the noise of the running 8urf~ce.
In response to a question posed by CommisEioner
McLaughlin,Mr.de Boom stated that th~Corona del ~~r
Elementary School site was considered for latch key
children,but there was not sufficip.nt interest to
support an after-school program at thifi loc~tion.
Commissioner Goff stat~d ":hat since the running track
could ~utilized until 9:00 p.m.during the summer
mo~chs~~thout the benefit of illumination,he asked if
the adjoining resident.s would find i t ac~epta.ble to
illuminate the running track until 9:00 p ....dun.fig the
wlnt.p,r I1\Onths.Chairman King suggested that pt:rhaps
recessed lighting could be installed in tne parapet
vall on the running track which may not bo offensive to
the surrounding residents.
Mr.de Boom referred to a model of th~requested
development which depicted the proposed layout.
,!"o£X
April 21,1983
NeMXlr1t Beach
MlNJTES
ROIl CAU
Commissioner McLaughlin asked Mr.de Boom lr they had
eons idered placing a portion of th..r"ci li ty
underground or lowerinq tht'facil!ty an ":;~riot to
exceed the maximum allowable height.Mr.de Boom
stated that this concept had been discu&C.f:d,however
the costs of ~~e prnject would increase h~cauae of the
amount af soil exeavation which would be t'lecessary.
Chairman King stated that beeause the project would be
developed with donations and matching gr.nt funds,the
applicant is trying to keep the costs at a minimum~
Mr.Raleigh Pusard,resident of 2139 Anr.iver8ary Lane
and retired Director of t.he YMCA,apPC..l)r(!ldbefore the
C01nmission.He stated that the YMCA ::Ir.H"~ratp.s from
program memberships,community fun~s and donations.He
stated that the National YMCA has stringent regulations
for their professionally trained and college educated
staff members.He stated that important income is
derived from adult physical education memberships.He
stated that the proposed development is needed in order
to more adequately serve the ~mbers of the ~ommunity.
He stated that the concerns of the surrounding
residents and the concerns which have been expressed,can be resolved.
Commissioner Winburn asked if the wall,adjacent to the
Anniversary Lane tract,·which was constructed
originally 1968,was constructed atth"r.i.nil!lU1Dheight,
rather than 5 feet in height becaus"of a lack of
funds.Mr.Pusard stated that funds 'Wp.relacking in
196B,but that the residents of the area workil!dwith
the YMCA in resolVing the problems which drOS~4
Mr.John Shear,resident of 2128 Mesa Drive.suggested
that the handball court be constructed u~erqround.He
stated that ",variance to exceed the height.is n,,,t
warranted because of the lack of funds.lie st,lted thi)t
the proposed development can be cut down i1J size·and
still aCCommodate the needs of the facility.He stated
that the blinking pacing light on the running track are
objectiontible and that an amplified paging system
should not be allowed during the eveninq hours.lie
also expressed his concern that the proposed
development ....y wa.rrant the·expansion of Universi tyDriveinthefuture.
-43-
COMN
April 21,1983 MINUTES
Cit of New t Beach
Chairman King stat.ed that pacing liqht;tc whi ch tlfJ hllf;
observed at other f.a.cilitieK are not not tc~ablf!t untj J
the runner himself approdches the light.
Ms.Margaret Polson,resident of th~,P'our Pours
Condominium Association,and out-goinq Pr~hjdent of the
Association,appeared before the Commission.Ms.
Polson stated that the members of the-lUJ!lot:iati(Jo ar~
not fully ll.ware of the impact.l1 of the proposed
development.She expressed their conc~rns relatin?to
the proposed lightiT~,pacing light.,lnnd&caping,
noise,traffic,and the general imphdts upon the
community.She requested that.this i t-#m he continued
so that the members of the Association t:~n become more
familiar with the proposed development.
MS.Polson stat.1!d that the '('-teA d'.divered a
iJresentati.on to the Fe,..;uFours Associlltion lllst week,
but not all members of the AS50C!Ation were in
attendance for the presentation.
Chairman King asked if it would be pOssible to locate
the pacing lights in the parapet walls.Planning
Director Hcwicker stated that the only enclosure of the
parapet 'Walls is in the corners,with an opocn railing
in between.
Mr.Dave Lorenzini,the architect for the project,
stated that the parapet wall will be lOC<1ted
approximately 18 to 24 inches above the surface of the
running track,which can ar:commodatc th~proposed
walkway lighting.fie stated that the pacin9 lights
utilize very low voltage dnt:!because of the hcigh~of
the bUildlng,the adjacent residentG would not be able
to gee the lights.
Chairman King stated that lenses of t.he p.Jcinq lights
are similar to traffic lights,which can not be seen
unless a person is viewing them from a head on
position,rather than a aide bngle.Hr.T..oren¥ini
stated that the pacing lights do not rl~nh nnd are not
bright.He stated that the pacing light.n are covered
wit.h colored lemu~1i ''IS descdb ....d by Chfiirmiltl y'ing.
INDEX
April 21,1983 •MlNUHS
IN[)£XROllCAli
City of NeNport Beach
In response to a question posed by COf!ltfilN.r;ionf!cGaff
lMr-l..<>renzl.ni further explained th(~dr>f.dqn of the
parapet walL Mr.Lorenzini stated that the irJtent is
to keep the height of the parapet wn]1 iSn low as
possihle,in order to keep the bulk of t.hl!hUilding as
low as posn:ible.HE'stat.cd t.hat the ligt,ts will he
located in the sidewall of the parapet wo'111.lie stated
that only the open railing will be abow~th~parapet
wall.fie stated that the lights will ty!installed to
only 18 inches above th~running surf",c~.He stated
that the walkway lights will only cast ~glow upon the
runninq surface and will not be visible!ftC'fn adjoining
residents.
Ms.Cynthia Bro-"m,resider.t of 2275 (~')ldlCl'j Circle,
located directly behind tho YMCA,app'i!iJ;rr.obefore the
Corrar.ission.Ms.Brown stated that sn~w~u;opposed to
lighting which was requested at the Ilj7e hearing on
this matter.However,she stated that tho lighting was
installed and .:...t is very objectionable to her.She
expressed her concerns relating to the tra~h which is
deposited upon her property,the loudspeaKers which ar~
utili:ted and the maintenance of the landRc~pin9.She
stated that ,the mass of the proposed c1~velopment bl
objectionable and that she is opposed to the height
limit being exc~ded.
Chairman King stated that one of the suggestions is
that the parking lot be closed off when the facility is
clo&ed,80 that unauthorized persons can not gain
access to the parking lot.COmRliss.ioncr 8alalis stated
that increasing the height of the wall may be helpful
to the adj~c-ent residents.He also stated th"t
landsCAping conditions are beinq pruposed fOT the
facility.Ms.Brown stated that the higher the ~ull is
built,the more the sun is blocKod froM her property.
In raspon!:le to II que~tiQn posed by Conu:nir.Gloncr Allen,
M.s.Brewn stated that she-re(tli?e~;thllt the light
source from the light standards can be concealed,
however I Ms.Brown stated that she is Oppos(!d to the
illumination which is generated frnm the parking lot
lighting.
-45-
COMNdSSK:NRS •
April 21,1983
City of Ne'lNOl1r't Beach
ROll CAU
MlNUTES
INDEX
Ms.Martha Durkee,l'f!'sident of 2031 1 {"Yfir('!1~r.tr(!'f>t:(HId
President.of the Hack Bay ASf;ociat.ion,4fiJjn.tT~rl l.f?!or!'t
the Connlos1on,and stated that the lne:nb(H~of the Und'.
Bay Association \fere never inform~d or the YIt'(;A
proposal.Ms.Durkee stated that they 4~~in favor of
developme~t ot the YMCA.However,she otbt~d that they
are concerned with the following:the noig~generht~d
from the amplified speakers,the m~intenance and
landscaping of the area,and the height 6f the propoE~d
facility,She stated that the excess h~19ht would set
a precedencu for the area.She furth~T stated that
they feel S6 though the proposed runnlnl)track would
not be necessary,because of the many r\lt1f11nqtrails in
the Back aay an~a.She suggested thllt th'?site be
graded in order to construct the prr,Jpnned facit1 ty
low~r on the site.She requested thdt the items be
continued in order for further study by tht!members of
the BaCK Bay Associbtion.
Mrs-_Batham,resident of 10451 Upper Bay Drive,
appeared before the Commission.Mrs.BIlth4rn statp.d
that she is in favor of the YMCA,however,she 1s
concern~d with the excessive height of the proposed
fsetH ty.She stated that eight hO"",8 on Mesa Dd ve
will be adversely affected by the proposed height.Sh~
expressed her concern relating to the increase in
traffic on University Drive and questioned how a 'Wl?st
bound lane could be adde<l to the intersection.
In response to
Planning Director
will be required
Commission.
a question posed by Mrs.Barham,
Hewicker stated that thb;bppliclttion
to obtain approval from the Coastal
Mrs.8ntham stated that public noticeu of the he~ring
should have been mailed to all of the condOfltinium
residents,rath~r than just the Prm~irlent of the
condominium association.She requcnted that these
items be continued until such notices Gr~mailed.
Commissioner Allen requested that Mrs.bdtham submit "
list of the addreti&ea on Mesa Drive to the Planning
Department.She stated that the staff will also send
public notices to the affected community as~ociations.
Planning Director Hewicker stated that public notices
are normally not sent beyond the 300 foot legal limit.
~CAll
April 21 ;198,3
NAiNnCyt Beach
Mr.Donald Webb,City Engin~cr,regpGnd~~t.o Mr~.
Batha.m'5 concern relating to the additS(Jn of a
westbound right turn lane on Universlty Drive.He
stated that the street is of sufficient width to
rcstzipe,which would allow for a t.hird ItHH~iH,tlliG
loca-cion.
Planning Director Hewicker ntated that public notices
were sent to all owners of th<e condomirdurtl project
which were within the 300 foot limit,which iro
dpproxi~~tely one-half ot the condominium vwner~.
Chairman King sugg~5ted that the remainder of the
condominium owners be noti fied of tht1'proposf;d
developMent.
Planning Director I1ewicr:cr stated th~t the elimirldtion
of the proposed running tr~ck will not golv~t~e height
problem.He stated that height of thn propoBed
gytrt.nasilJ.:nl'Ilone,exceeds the allowable hei qht in the
2./28 Foot Height Limitation District.
Mr.ne Boom stated that appr~y.~rn~tely35 m~mb~rR of th~
F()ur Fours Condrnn.intum Association mP.t ltt the YMCA o!".
7~~O p.m."Ii April 12th I tc/d:"5cl.r;r,.th~:proposf·d
development.He stated t.hat ~he propoced liqhtinq and
traffic were .",Iso diftt."ussed.lie stated t:Of1t.the YMCA
had agreed to chain the driveway aft<irlO:OO p.m.in
order t~exclude vehicles frcm entering the parking lot
after hours.He stated t~at they also agreed to place
a stop sign-acro8Bthe ~xit path and that th~eXisting
stop sign would be relocated to be mol'f!vi sible..He
ztated that -::'heYMCA also had a prelir.dnilry li,~eting
with the Board of Directors of the As!.oci1Jt it:ln to
discaas the propos~d deviP.loptncnt.
Commissioner Goff stated that the ch,'Jinlng of parking
lotn haa presented problcmR in the Pdst_Mr.de Boom
suggested that a gate ccmld be utilized t0501ve the
proble",.
Mr ~de Bo(")rnstated tha.t many of the concerns (!xpresscd
relating to tbe noise generated by the YMCA,will be
greatly reduced with the proposed development because
most of the activities can then be held indoors,U1thu
than outaid(1.
COM (er MlNUH:S
ROll CALl INDEX
Motion
All "ye~'"x X X X X X
April 21,1983
City of ~lPOrt Beach
Connissioner Balalis S\l9qe:~tcd th4t th,).1.rchit.~ct
C'onsider the possibility of lowering ttl~'tmj 1111nq.Pc
also SU9geGtcd that the YMCA noti.1y Oleo imll1(.dL,t('
rQsidents of the area and float hnlloons to thp
proposed height of the structure.Me.de Boom
concurred and gtated that this can be .'i(.'compl ished on
Saturday,Apri 1 30th.He stat".'d t-hut he o.,.i 11
distribute flyers to the Anniversary TInct,Hesa Drive
and condominium residents.He stated th4t he will also
take photographs of the balloon deU.I()nntrdtion.He
stated that the YMCAwants to contiOJ.~(!to be a good
neighbor.
Commissioner Goff stated that the concH tiona or.the
original use permit were specific in thot no outdoor
9",me courts or activities of a noisy ro.,,~\ln~were to he
permitted without first obtaining ,;a use perm!t.
Hcy"I(~.....er,he 5tat~d that the testimony linn revealed that
noisy outdoor activities do take place.fie stated that
many of the noisy outdoor activitien will be moved
inside the facility with approval of the proposed
development.He further stated that if the proposed
development were to be approved,the YMCAwould be
required to adhere to the conditions relating to the
lighting systems and landscaping.
Chairman Kin9 stated that the staff wnuld not have to
send additional public notices to the ~~rsons who have
already been notified of the public hearing,but only
to those pQrsons and associations who have been
previously mentioned as not having received a public
notice.
M.otion was
Commission
CARRIED.
made to continue these item:,to the Planning
Meeting of May 5,1983,which MOTION
•••
-48-
COM~RS •Hay 5,1983 •MINUTES
Items No.
S,C (;7
ALL
APPIlOVED~-
TIONALLY
ROll CAl.l
lewoort Beach
Traffic Study (Continued Public Hearing)
Request to consider a Tr4ffi,~Study in conjur1ct:lon wit.h
a 45,000 sq.rt.addition to ~he YMCA facility.
AtlD
Uge Permi t No.1128 (1Imended)(Col1t1nulltd PublicHearlnq)
Request to amEnd a previously approved UCr ...permit that
p.!nnitted the establishment of a YMCAfacility in the
R-l District.Th~proposed amendrrrentin tI request to
construct a 45,000 ±sq.ft.addition t.hat includes
youth and f~mily fitnes~facilities,n gyMnastics
center,a child care center,officee,h community
meeting cellter and an illuminated roof top
jogging/exercise area.The proposal alQfJ includes 4
modification to the Zoning Code 508ft to allow a
portion of the proposed building.an enclosecl trash
area,and a 6 foot wall to encroach into t.he required
20 foot front yard setback:,a portion ot thl!'!required
parking spaces to b2 compact spaces,and to allow oS
wall mounted identi fication sign in excess of 2 sq.
ft.;and the acceptance of an environmental document.
AND
Variance No.1098 (Continued Public H~aring)
Request to allow a portion of the pr.opo~~d addition to
the Orange Coast YMCAto exceed the maxi,mum allowable
height in the 24/28 Foot Height Limitation District.
LOCATION:Parcel No.1 of Parcel Map No.3-35
(Resubdivision No.215)located at 2300
University Drive,on the northerly side
of University Drive.eauterly of Tustin
Avenue in the West Bay area.
ZONE:R-l
Ai'PLICANT:Orange Coast YMCA,Newport Beach
OWNER:Sarna as applicant
-16-
!lay 5,1983
~lInOrt Beach
Agenda Items No.5,6 and 7 were heard (;'fmeurrently.
due to th~ir relationship.
The public hearing opened in connection wi th these
items and Mr.James de Boom,Exec~tive Dir~ctor for the
Orang~Coast YMCA"and resident 01 N~rt Beach,
appear~d before the Commission.Mr.d~D{}Offtsta.ted
that the YMCA held an open house on April 30,1983,to
demonstrate the height of the proposed structure to all
interested parties.He stated that oop fil!iqhhor,'=me
Planning COll1Il1issionerand several of the YMCA staff
members attended the demonstration.He then submitted
to the Planning Commission the invitation&which were
circulnted to the surrounding n~iqhborhood and a
subsequent letter which was circulated which advised
that the height of the proposed bulldlr:g would he
reduced.He alsC'submitted a pet ition containing
approximately 93 signatures in support of the YMCA
request and a petition containing 4 siqnatures opposed
to the YMCA request.
Mr.de Boom delivered a slide presentation which
depicted the existing facility and demoMtrated with
balloons,the reduced height of the propns"d structure
in relationship to adjacent properties,1ncluding Ms.
Brown's residence,the Four Fours Condominium alte,andMesaDrive.
Mr.de Boom stated that they are now proposing to lower
the height of theprOI'Csed structur"by dropping the
structure into .the ground by approximat"ly 30 inches
which will cost approximately $20,000.00.He stated
that in order to lower the structure 49 inches into the
ground,the cost would be approximately S109,500 ..00.
He stated that it would not be feasible to lower the
st.ructure 49 inches into the ground because extensive
excavation and haulinq of earth would be te!quired,it
uould be located below the water line,water-proofing
would be necessa.ry,additional drc"linaqe~catch basin
sy~terriS .and additional handicapped ramping wol11d hav~to be installed.
Hr.de Boom stat~d that the staff repott indicates the
revised heights in relationship to the originally
requested beights.He stated that the proposed
gymnasium parapet has been reduced to 29 teet a""the
root has been reduced to 28 feet 10 inches,He stated
that the corner e;".tension has been reduced from 39 feet
to 34 feet 10 inches.
COMN6SICNRS •l14y 5,1983 •Ml!'UT[S
Cit t Beach
Mr.dp Boom stated that the pl"()pos~d hf'Jtjhts are
necessary in order to have a gymnasium facilJty that is
usable for basketball and vclleyba.ll comy.,1t.iorl.lie
stated that the requested gymnasiu.:a height o1()'Hi not set
a precedent for office buildings in the dre4.
In response to a question posed by Comaissicner
McLaughlin,Mr.de Boom stated th3t the revised roof
height of 28 feet 10 i nch~s,includes loworinq the
structure into the ground by a.pproxiIMtely )0 inches.
He stated that.if the structure were to be lowered more
than 30 inches,water-prooflnq of the 9}'BnaJJiUlll floor
would continuously be 3 problem.
CommiGS10n~r McLaughlin asked vhy the corOP-T extensions
are e5fj~ntial to the design of the facility.Mr.de
Boom stDted that the corner cxt-t"'nsions Are rloc@ssary in
order to bre&k up th~design of the flat roof for the
runninf:J track.
Mr.Roy knutson,resident of 2504 Unive~s1ty Drive and
nn officer of the Four Fours Condominium Association,
appeared before the Commission.Mr.Knutson expressed
his concern with th"traffic iJIIpacts which "ill be
generated by the proposed expansion.He questioned the
assumptions of the Traffic Study in general,and tho.e
relatinq to the intersection of I rvine Avenue and
Santiago Drive.He further questioned the right turn
l""e solution on Univ"rsity Drive and stated that the
traffic on University Drive viII adversely impact the
surrounding residential uses.
In reRponse to a question posed by Hr".Knutson,Kr.
Donald Webb,City Engineer,stated that the adjacent
office condominium was included in the traffic counts
and the leu calculations of the Traffic Study.
Comrnissiori.cr Goff aSKed Mr.Wehb to C'onwtW!ntOn the
assumptions for thC'intersection of Irvine Avenue and
SantL.,go Drive/22nd Street ~Hr.Webb stated that the
assumptions do constitut~a fine ]ioo,but that the
analysis was performed under the same rules as apply to
other devdopments.
-18-
COM..v6SlCNRS
May 5,1983 •M1NlTfES
C'I'\AAJrVYt Beach
ROlL CAll
M.s.Cynthia Brown,resident of 2275 Golden Circle,
located directly behind the Yl'I::A,appeared before the
Commission.Ms.Brown stated that she .ht.tended the
open house and that the YMCA has reaponded to her
concerns.However,she stated that the:proposed
expansion will adversely affect her residence and the
value of her propert.y.She str -ell that she has
experienced securi ty problems v~·.~...'tlroperty and
stated that she concurs wi th t .d landscape
plan for the back wall on her pr,,~~h..""9gested
that the landscaping be heaV"j'enouq ..0 pr"vent perJOOns
frOll1gaining access to her property.sn..urged thlot
the YMCAparki n9 lot be required to b"...cured by a
gate durin9 non-business hours.She furth~r expressed
her concern with the height and the mass of th~
proposed facility.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner
Winburn,Ms.Brewn stated Ulat her propert)'1s
currently.sparsely landscaped on the back wall.lis.
Brown stated that the proposed landscaping plan should
be able to give her privacy,yet be able to filter
light through to her property.
MS.Kay Weist.resident of 2499 Anniversary Lane.
appeared before the C"""'ission and stated that the Yw::A
provides a needed service for the entirl.e<mmtnity.
She stated that the current YMCAfacility needs
expansion for their programs.She further stated that
the traffic problems have expanded in all areas of the
City,not just in the area of the YMCA.
Planning Director Hewicker referred to the Traffic
Study and explained the sensitivIty of the trip
generation and the assignment of traffic to the
intersection of Irvine Avenue and Santiago Drive..He
stated that there are three aeparate tests which each
intersection goes through in a Traffic Study.He
stated th4t in this partiCUlar Traffic Study,it was
d~termined that it passed the first test ..
Mrs.Bath.....resident of 20451 Upper 8;!y Drive.
appear~d before the Commission.Mrs.Bathem expressed
her concern with the hdght of the proposed facility
and the proposed ~kylights.She referred to the
mitigation measur~s And stated that When ~lific4tions
are being considered for the proposed fa''i.l1ty,the
COMJWSSIO-:i.RS
.....
[~ei"_.,
•May 5,1983 •MINUTES
City of NIPWloor:t Beach
ROIl CAU
public should be notified of S41"i.e..She furtht1r At ..t~d
that the State of California requirf1$Ulnt any
counselinq facility be sound attenuated to ,1 1f'!vel of
45 dba.
Ms.Ada Taylor,resident of 2514 UnitJf;:cfjity Drive,
5tated that she is i~favor of the YMCA as an
organization.However,she expre~sed her Cnhc&rn with
the t.raffic impacts of the propoF.ed cxp.aruJ!on and the
aenthetics of the project.She £tated that the
lar~scapinq of the current facility needs improvement.
She asked how the new conditions of approvGl relating
to the landscaping plan will be enforced.
In response to 4 question posed by Mn.Tuylor,~13nninq
Director Hewicker disc~s5ed how lan~scQpl~9 con~jtlons
of approval are enforced by the City.He Btat~d that a
complaint or a violation can be reported to the City's
Code Enforcement Officer which will foll""up on the
complaint.
MS.Beverly Mullen,resident of 2031 Mesa Drive in
Santa Ana Hei9ht~,stated that she is in favor ~f the
YMCA,however.she is opposed to the propo8&d requ~sts.
She stated that the proposal is situat~in the unique,
ecologically sensitive Upper Bay area.She stated that
the proposed signs would be offensive to the Upper Bay
environment.She further expressed Mr.con("ern with
the excessive height of the proposed building and
stated that it will be detrimental to the surrounding
neighborhood.She stated that the structure should not
be allowed to exceed the 28 foot height limit.
Me.Dave Lorenzini,the ~,rchiteet for the proJect,
stated that 97%of the perimeter of tilt'!parap~t vall
will be established at 28 feet in height above the
grade.fie stated that the corner cxtP.nr.lone and
railings will ~approximately 7 feet above the
parapet.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner
Ralalis,Ms.Mullen stated that she is opposed to the
structure exceeding the 28 foot heiqht limit.She
state<!that the corner cxtensior.n and open railings
will be at a height of 35 feet,which iB objectionable
for d residential area.She statp.d thitt th~running
track st::Quld not be located on the proposed 9ymnasium.
ROll CAll
Kay 5,1983 •MINUTES'
INDEX
t Beach
Ms.Marguerite Butler,resident of tt~four Fours
Condominium A~sociation,s~aLed that she 1~in favor of
the proposed expansion of the YMCA facility.~he
expressed her concern with the height of t.he parapet,
however,she stated that the YMCAhas trlf>:<1 to conform
to the ocncerns expressed by the residents.
Mr_Eli Elman,resident of Balbod P~~l~vard and
President of the Y-Knots,a YMCA or9anl7.3t~on,appeared
before the Coam1ssion.Hr.Elaan 8tated that the
residents of the City .,ill be utiliz1nq the expanded
YMCAfacility.He stated that the adjacent office
condominium will gener4te three times th@ traffic than
that of the YMCAfacility.He stated that the YMCII
fa,=ility w1ll not generate a large voltJM of traffic
durinq the peak traffic hours.He atat(}d th4t the
p~oPOl3(?1.expansion will enl-c-anc<!the communi ty and not
be detrimental to the community.
Mr.Michael Ashe,resident of 106 Via Xanthe and
Chairman of the Board for the Oranqc Coast YMCA,
appeared before the Commission.Hr.Ashe atated that
the YMCAhas worked hard to propo.e a viable project
for the c~unity.He stated that dup to is lack.of
funds in 1965,the -;rymnasium.could not be confttruct~d
at that time.He stated that the propr..)1i(~dheight
request is not unreasonable.
M~.Sam Estonson~resident of 1770 W~$t Balboa
Boulevard,stGt~d that the propc.h~d ~y.panB1on wi 11
allow him and his wife to utilize the fa.cil j ty al the
Sdme time during the evening hours,which ~ill help to
alleviate some of the traffic in the area.
Mr.Don Gilium,~csident of ]3272 We;~th Court,
expressed his concern with the future expansion of
Uni.versity Drive.Mr.Don Webb,City En9in~('r,$tated
thl1t the J.en.gth of the ciqht turn]itr.e wi 11 be
a,pproximJ!tely 100 feet in lenqth at.the I'lUlximum.He
stdted that the City's Local Coast .....l t)lan does not
provide for the extension of University Orive,however,
the City I 5 Circulation F.lement does provide for this.
He stated that he can not say when,or if,t".his will
happen.H~also stated that he does not anticipate the
widening ~f University Drive on the southerly side.
-21-
COM~RS
MINUTES
ROllCAll
••Hay 5,1983
Cit of ~roort Beach
Kr.David Tosh,resident of Corona d(jl Mar,and the
for~er Chai~n of the Board for the Ora~~~Con3t YMCA,
stated that he supports the proposed eXl'~iJ,.;;;jofl for theYMCAfacility.
Mrs.Batham reiterated that she is not (Jt~JA"J!;p.d to the
YMCA itself,hut she is opposed to the r,r0r~aed heiqht
of the fa.cility.She stated that the City has state-d
that it will maintain a low profile on th~Lay and the
beaches.She stated that the proposed lighting st~uld
be conditioned at four feet so as not to adverselyaffectthesurroundingarea.
MS.Cynthia Bro""n nd l~rdted that sht"is f!f;1H:""rfiedwith
the height and the mass of the proposed ~.t.rut;:tlJr(>.She
suggested that th~funds be raised in ord~r tc l0'4er
the structure further into the ground.
Mr.de Boom stated that the way in which the gymn-8sium
has been designed,the corner extensions ~i]l not make
the entire struct.ure appear higher than the 28.{',:oct.
He referred to the landscape plan which also provides
for the concerns expressed by Ms..Brown..fk:~tatec1
that they are also willing to increase the helght of
the block wall in the corner to 5 feet.He stated that
the proposed expaJlsion is needed in ord(~r to serve its%l..embers.
Me..de Boom stated that they are in concurrence with
Condition No.29,~hich relates to the liqhting system.
He stated that p!lcking lot lighting is necessary in
order to ensure th~sat~ty and security of its members
dU;:ing the evening hours.He stated that the propo3(~d
signs are cnly SO square feet in size whi ch wi 1]bf:"
recessed into the wall and not ill~inatEd.He
reiterated that it would not be feasible to lower the
structure further into the ground because
watEr-proofing ~nd the qymnasium floor Would
continuously be a problem.
Cornmi.ssioner Winburn stated that many of the r(!'sidp.nts
are Opposed to the height ot"th~c:nrn(!r Cy.tensions for
the prorX:)!H~dgymnasium and asked why t:he running track
1s necessary.as proposed.Hr.nltvid Hardinq.
Associate Executive DirectQr of the Ocanqo Coact YMCA,
COMMISSIONERS
May 5,1993
Ci
MINUTES
ROll CAli
NeAlPOrt Beach
explained that the organized joggJnq ptr~raas are
geared towards per.sons who have und6r~on~cardiac
operations.He explained the importane~that such
programs mu&t.b~monitored closely by rnettlb~rs of the
ltaff and held in a controlled environment.He stated
that jogging around the eXisting dirt track or the
gymnasium floor does not provide for a qU~11ty jogging
program.Mr.ve Boom stated ~hat aCceS8 to the running
track will be controlled by electronic Bccurity cards.
In respc.mse to a question posed by C("AI'W:1issioner
Balalis,Mr~Harding stated that the runfllnq t.rack \till
be utilized by cftrdi~c parti-::ipants an ..nIl aft other
members of the YMCA inter.ested in jOfJqlnq fitness
classes.Mr.Ifttrding stated that thp.jf)f19inqfitness
classes attract many participants,which is why the
Jogging track is n~cessary~
Commissioner Balalis dsk~d if it would b0 feasible to
construct the running track at ground ll!vel ~Mr.de
Boom stated that locating the running track around the
pool would not be feasible with the amount of children
utilizing the pool facllttie".
Commissioner Balalis stated that if 4 cardiac
participant were to experience problems,It.would be
difficult to transport the person to the k""er level of
the facility and to the hospital.Mr.Harding
reiterated that a controlled environment .t iJ;necessary
in order for the staff to monitor the jogging
participants,so that injuries are preF~ntr~d.
Commissioner 8alalis askE.d why the 7 tOOt.high corner
extensions hre necessary,other than for ~rch1tectural
purposes ~Mr~Harding stated that th~corner
p.xtensions are necessary to prevent tho runners from
feeling as though they will run off of the rooftop.
Commissi.oner Ballilis l)sked if a minimum h(!ight of 42
inches would serve the same purpose.Mr.Harding
statr:d that thi s may bo acceptable I howev(!r,he stated
that the height of the-f;tairwell is at thu height of
the corner extension'S which tie the buildihg together.
Commissioner Goff asked if it would be feasible to
locate ~he running track in an area of the Bite which
is currently set aside for landscaping./olr.Harding
.tated that most of the landscaped areas "'ill include
INDEX
ROll CAll
•May Sf 1983
'l:"0",.s '">-;<;;->:-City of"<>>""-~s •n ;.~,-;~'"::i ,
MINUTES
INDEX.
t Beach
parking spaces and sidewalks.He 5tat~~i HUll locating
the running track in these areas would h4t provide for
a controlled atmosphere.H('statf:>d t.h.,t lh@r~is no
contiguous,lAnobstructed area on the s1tt1 10 which the
running track could be located.1ft:stat~th.at
re~tripin9 the parking lot would not bt1'feasible or
n:~501vethe problem.
Mr.de Boom stntfOd that in order to l!¥iJo:'f!the project
more viable,they would be Willing to r~duce the corner
oxtensions to the height of the railing.Chairman Xing
stated that Harbor View fElls overloo~"the running
track at The Sporting ilouse and to his knt.l....l~dge,there
have been no complaints rec(!!ved fr0f1\t.hl"!adjacent
residential uses regarding the running tr6ck.
In resr~nse to ~que~tion posed by CQmmi~sioner
McLaughlin,Planning Director Hewicker ~titter)th-tJt the
open railing is illustrated on the plans a3 heing an
open pipe rai.ling with hori.zontal members appr0Xifl'l6tel\'
one foot apart.
Planning Director Hewicker slated that the heights for
the various zone classifications are generaily
determined by the types of uses which would normally be
found in the zones.He stated that uses such as
churclles,governmental buildings and institutional utes
are permitted in residential zones,subj~ct to securing
a use permit.He stated that there are no different
regulations for greater height 1imi ts which apply to
such uses.However,he stated that !O:uchUSf20S are
generally not designed as that of residential U5~~.
Jil",nning Director fI~....icker st.l1ted that the proposed SO
t;qulJrc foot sign,;are one-ft:>urth of th{"nize of a sign
whirh would automatically be p~rmitted in a conmvtrcial
district.
Planning Director Hewickcr stated th&t it has been
demonstrated at this facillty in the pant,that parking
lot lighting at 4 feet in height is not feasible.lie
stilted that current parking lot lightirlg technology can
provide hiqher lighting for security I<hich would be
more compdtibl.n with ~,e surrounding residential uses.
COMN4S~RS
COMN6SK:NRS
May 5,1983 e-Mlr-uTES
IN[)[X
City of N€\Ivoort Beach
1 n response to a question posed by Comtif;!;!oncr Goff.
Me.Wer-b stated that reduction or the corner
extensions to the height of the railing,r~duces the
height of the bUilding from 35 feet to 31 feet 6inches.
I n response to a question posed by eonnlssioner
McLaughlin,Planning Director H~wicker Rt~tod that the
u?>(!permit has been condt tinm:od so th(lt.Uwr~will he
no illumination of the proposed 61gns.
COU61'lissioner Kurlande:t asked if a 5 foot high wall
~ould b~required where the 4 f~Jt high wall currently
exi!1ts.Planning Director Hewicker stated t.hat adding
one foot to the existir-,g wall could be 4 problem in
matching the brick and mortar.He st"'ted that J.n some
instances,a wall becou~s more unsightly wh~n brick and
~rtar are added at a later date.
Commies loner Kurlander stated that a higher wall may be
necessary for security purposes for the sur'rounding
residential uses.Chairman King stated tr9t an
alternative would be to intensify the dona!ty vf the
landscaping at this particular location.
In tesponse to a question posed by Co~issioner
J<urland~r,Planning Director Hewickec atl'tted that time
limitations are not isnpo5ed upon Traffic Study
approvals.He stated that the City's TrAffic Phasing
Ordin~nce procedures would have to be dmehd~d in order
to do 80..He stated that uses such as churches and
institutions rely upon private donations for their
construction,which mQkes it irnp~actic~l to 9uarantee
the time frame in which the project will be completed.
Hay 5,1geJ
of NeAlOOrt Beach
ROU (AU
Motion
.1;..11 Ayes
x
X X X X •
1'RAFFIC STUDY
Motion was made for approva.l of th'!Trlllffit:5tudYf
subject to the following findings and conditian.which
!lOTION CARRIED:
FINDINGS,
1.That a Traffic Study ha.been prepared """ch
analyzes the !8pact of the proposed project on tne
circulation system in accordance with Chapter
15.40 of the 'fewport Beach Municipal C<X!..and CityPolicy$-1.
2.That the Traffic Study in<licates that the project-
generated traffic will be greater than one ~rc@nt
of the eXisting traffic during the 2.5 hour ""ak
period on any leq of the criti~al interaEctlontf,
and will add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic
service at crit:Jt.:'al intersect-ion whjch will ha.ve
an Intersection Capacity Utilization of qr ....terthan.90.
3.That the Traffic Studies sugge"t a circulation
system improvement which will improve the level of
traffic service to an acceptable level at all
critical interGQCtiorts.
4.That the proposed project.including e1rculation
system improvements "'ill neither.cause nor make
worse an unsatisfactory le"el of traffic service
on any "major","primary-modified"'or "primary"strep.t.
CONDITION:
1 •That prior to the occupancy of the proposed
project the circulation system improvements
described in the Traffic Study dated April 1983 on
Page 10 prepared by JEP'Engineering.Inc ••shall
ha"e been accomplished unless suh""quent project
approvals require modification~thereto.(The
ultimate design ot the intersection shall he
subject to the approval of the City TrafficEnqilleer).
-26-
MNJrESMay5,1983
of t~·~t Beach
USE PERMI1'NO.1128 (A!l£IIDED)
Motion
All Ayes Motion was made for a.pproval of Use Penalt ~o.1128
(Amend"d),subject to the following findings dIld
conditions,with Condition No.21 to be k""'nded 'to
reflect that the YMCAwill intensify the landscaping
adjacent to the Anniversary Lane Tract,And increase
the wall and landscaping at tha northwesterly ~~rner of
the site where the fOO!:traffic is occurrinl}which will
preclude persona from qainin/}access at this location,
Condition No.34 be """"nde<l to inc1u<l<t till'wordin9,
"pa""'anent"amplified paging systaftlS,ComdHI"n No.36
be amended to reflect that the proqramh ~h~ll be
modified by the YMCAin a man""r appWYsd by the
Planning Depa.rtment:and,an additional eondHJ.on which
would reflect that a gate be provided 4~roas the
driveway to close off the parkin9 lot during the
non-business hours,which MOTIONCAP~IEDI
x
X X •X X
FINDINGS:
1.'.!'hal:an Initial Study and Negati ""ll<:claration
have been prepared in compliance with t.."ie
California Enviro.-ntal Qualil:y Act,and tha'
their contents have been c",nsidere"in tho
<l<tcisions on this project.
2.That based on the information cont.ained in the
Negative Declaration,the project incorporate£
sufficient mi.tigation measur(!s to reduct'>
potentially significant enviro~ntal effects.and
that the project will not re-sult in tdqnificant.
environmental impacts.
J.The project will comply with all applicable City
and State BUilding Codes and Zoning r~uire.ments
for new building applicable to the district in
which the proposed project I ~located,except
those it_requested in conjunction with the
pr(:'>sed modifications.
4.That the Proposed use is consistent with the Land
Use Element of the Gen.,ral Plan,and is coq;>atible
wi th surroundinq land uses.
-27-
Hay 5,1963
Cit t Beach
M!l\UTES
5.The project lot siz.e conforms to the 1...o111w-l Co&?
area requirements.
6.The Pol~ce Department has indicated that it d<,'".not ~ontemplate any problems.
7.Adequate off-street parking and relat<>d V41htCl.llar
circulation are bein9 provided in conjunction withtheproposeddevelopment.
O.The proposed number of cOlllp4ct car spaces
cQnstitutes 19 percent of the parki~requLrements
which is within limits generally conddered
acceptable by the City Traffic Engineer.
9.The approval of US"Permit No.1120 (AMndedl will
not,under the circumstances of thJn ease be
detrimental to the health,safety,peace,morals,
comfort and general welfare of P<'EOOnf&residing
and working in the nei9hborhood or be detrimental
or injurious to property or improvements in the
neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
COliDITIOlfS:
1.That development shall be in subStantial
conformance with the approved plot plan,floor
plans,rp.vised elevations and sections,except asnotedbelOw•
2.That all mechanical equipment and trash areas
shall be screened from University Drive andadjoiningproperties.
3.That all improvements be constructed as t'equired
by Ordinance and the PUblic Works Department.
4.That vehicular access be provided to the eXisting
storm drain easement access road locltted at the
northeasterly corner of the parcel to thE'"
satisfaction of the PUblic Works ~partmont.
5.That the on-site vehicular
circulation systems be subject
by the Public Worka Department.
and pedestrian
to further review
Kay 5,1983
t .....Beach
MlNUHS
IQ.l·CAU
G.That th"eXisting deteriorated <lriv.apron and
gutter on the University Drivf':frontage be
replaced under an encroactunent r~l'll1!t i g!'fupd bythePublicWork!;Department.
7.That prior to the issuance of d bU1!din9 pomit,
the applicant shall demonstue"to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department and the
Public Works Department,tha~se"'"r facilities
will be available for the project et the time ofOCCUpancy.
8.That arranq ......nts be made ",ith th"P'I!>licWorks
Department to guarantee satisfactcJry ct.JMplf!'tlonofthepublicimprovements.
9.That a master plan of sewer,water and t:torm drain
facilities be prepared and approved by the Public
Works Department prior to issuance of any bulldi"9permits.
10.Development of site shall be subject to a gradinq
pomit to be approved by the Building and PlanninqDepartments.
11.That a grading plan,if required,shall include a
complete plan for temporary and ponnartent dr'linage
faciliti~s,to.minimize any potential impacts from
silt,debris,and other water pollutant ••
12.The grading permit shall inclUde,if requir~d,a
desc.ciption of haul routes,iJCcess PO;lOts to the
site,watering,and sweeping program designed to
minimize impact of haul operations.
13..An erosion,siltation and dust control plan,if
required,shall be submitted and be SUbject t~the
approval of the 8uUding Depart"",nt ar.d a copy
shall be forwarded to the California Regior~l
Water Quality Control Board,Santa Ana Region.
14..The velocity of concentrated run-off f~cm the
project shaU be evaluated and erosive velocitl.es
controlled as part of the project design.
-29-
•COMM\SSKNRS •HayS,1983
Ci of Ne\MXlrlt Beach
M1!'UTE5
15.'that 9rading shall be conducted in aCCf)Tdimc€-with
plane prepared by a Civil Engineer 4'1<1 based on
recoanendations of lJ soil engirle'f')'r and oItn
engineering geologist subsequent to the completion
of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation
of the site.Permanent reproducible cor,lea of the
-Approved as Built-grading plans on stand«cd size
sheets shall be furnished to the BUildingDepartlft.l!nt.
16.That erosion control meAsures shall be done on any
exposed slopes within thirty days atter grading Or
48 approved by the Grading Engineer.
17.A la.ndscape and irrigation plan for th't project
shall be prepared by a licen'''d landscape
architect.The landscape plan shall intc9rate and
phase the installation of landscaping "lth the
proposed construction schedule.(Prior to the
occupancy of any structure,the licen.e~l~ndscape
architect shall certify to the Planning Department
that thP.landscaping has been installed in
accordance with the prepared plan).
18.The landscape plan shall be subject to th~reVlew
of the Parks,Beaches and R~crc4t:ion Department
and approval of the Planning Oeparbbent.
19.The landscape plan shall inclwJe a aaintenance
program which controls the use of fertilizers andpesticides.
20.The landscape plan shall place heaVy -phasic on
the use of drought-resistant native vegetation and
be irrigated with a systP.~detiqned to a~otd
surface runoff and over-watering.
n.The landscape plan shall place heaVy emphuis on
fire-retardant vegetation.The final landscape
plan shall be designed so as to intensity the
landscaping for screening purposes,adjacent to
the Anniversary Lane Tract,and to increaso the
Wo.'lllClnd landscaping at the northwesterly corner
of the site where the foot traffic is OCcurring.
so as to preclude persons from 9&in1n9 access atthislocation..
COM (
Hay 5,1983 MINUTES
ROllCAll INDEX
t Beach
22.Landscaping shall be regularly _ir,I s I oed free of
..eeds and debris.All vegetdt i on shall be
regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition.
23.That any roof top or other mechanical equipment
shall be sound attenuated in such IJ manner a6 to
achieve a maximum sound level of !JS DbA at the
property line.
24.That any mechanical equipment and ......'gency po..er
generators sha.ll be screened from view and noise
associated ..ith said installation"sholl be sound
attenuated to acceptable levels 1n roc~ptor areAS.
The latter shall b~based upon the rocov.mendations
of a qwU.i..fied acoustical en9infller,and be
approve~by the Planning Department.
25.That all buildin9s 0,.the project nl te shall be
equipped with fire suppression syste~napproved by
the Fire DepartJ:1ent.
26.That all access to the buildings be approved by
the Fire Department.
27.That fire vehicle access,includi"9 the proposed
planter islands,shall be approved by the Fire
Department.
28.Final design of the project shall provide for the
incorporation of water-saving dp.vicea for project
lavQtorles and other water-using faCilities.
29.That the lighting system with~n the 8tI~cture and
in the off-street parkin9 lot shall be desi9ned
and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the
li9ht source and to minimize 119ht spillage and
qlnre to the adjacent residential u!es.TIle planz
shall be prepared and si9ned by a Licensed
Electrical Engineer,..ith a letter from the
Engineer stating that,in his opinion,this
requirement ha~been met.
30.Thdt the final desi9n for the parking area be
approved by the City Traffic Engineer.
31.That a Dlinilllumof 181 parkin9 spac:es be provided
on-sito at all times.
Il~..
"I,-,,,",",-,'",C'ft.f~ir .
lI&y 5.1983
IOI:CAll
32.That a aax1lllulllof l~:I:135 spaces)of the parkinq
on-site ...y be compact parkinq spaces,
33.That no niqhtt1llle l!qhtinq shall be p&rIIIitted on
the runninq track/exercise a"ea.exc"pt for pacinq
l1qhts on the runninq track.
That no pertaanantampl1fied paqinq GyM:......shall
be permitted in any outdoor area on the BUbjectproperty.
35.That the two proposed wall 8iqM shall not be
i llUlDinated.
36.It shall be the responsibility of tOO YMCAto
IllOnitor its proqr....for the proposed facil!ty so
4S to,not exceed the capacity of the prop>sed
pa"ltillq lot.If it,is determined hythe Planninq
'DepArtment t1iat proq"....exceed the on-site
parkinq llpaces,they shall be JIOOditi-..by the YMCA
in,a1lWUlerapprOVedby the Planninq llepartsllrlnt.
31.'1'llIitaqates~ll~required across 'theddveway
,to close,8ff the parkinq lot'durinq .the
non-business hours.
COMMSSICNRS •MayS,1983 •MINUTES
t Beach
VARIANCE NO.1098
Motion was aade for approval of VarianCf!No.1098,
subject to the following findings and comi tions.with
an additional condition that the height of the parapet
valls be lilllited to that required by Co<Iewhich would
be 42 inches,which MOTION CARRIED:
Motion
All Ayes x X X X •
YINDINGS:
1.That there are exceptlonal or extraordinary
circua.tances applying to the lAnd.bul.lding.and
use proposed in this applicdUon.wIlich
circumstances and conditions do not generally
apply to land.building,and/or uses In the saas
district inasmuch as the YMCA's 9ymn4~1u.requires
specific diJllensions and height tbat do not apply
to adjacent properties in the vicinity.
2.That,the qrantinq of a variance to the height
requir~nt is necessary for the preftervation and
enj~nt of substantial property rights of the
applicant,inaS1llUchas without the height.the
YMCA could not offer programs necessary to sustain
i tse If and serve the CODIIIUn!ty •
3.That the establishment,maintenance,and operation
of the use.property,and building w111 not.under
the cirCUIIstances of the particular cas~,be
detrimental to tht!health,saf"ety,peace,cOlitort,
and "general welfare of persons residing or workinq
in the neighborhood of such proposed use or
detrimental or injurious to property and improve-
ments in the neighborhood or the general welfare
of the City.
CONDITIONS:
1.That develo_nt shall be in substantial
confoll'Mnee with the approved plot plan,floor
plans,revised elevations and sections.~xc~pt as
noted below.
2.That all applicable conditions of Use Pet1llit No.
1128 (Amended)shall be fulfilled.
3.That the heiqht of the parapet walls shall be
limited to that reqUired by Code,whle"would be
42 inches.The proposed stairwells 'shall be no
higher than the approved height "tile parapeit
walle.•*•
~EGATlV[DECLARATION
~Attachment NO.3
[-'_~J
Se(~et3ry for Resources
\400 Tenth Street
)a,ramento.CA 95814
(r)lJntj (led:
PublJc Servi~es Divlslon
~l.O.[;0',(838
)"nta Ana,CA 92702
Planning Uepilrlment
City of New~,rt Beach
3300 Newport fY)',]evard
Newport Beac;'.CA 92663
f NAME OF PRO-JECT:
I OMNGE COAST YMCA
PROJECT LOCATiON:2300 Univcr5~ty Drive Newpoet Beach,Californiis
The proposed CXp~flg.ion of an ~y.istinCJ Yt1CA that includes youth <"ifldfamily
fit:1ess facilities,a gYI1J1ilstics center,it child care cente:",offices,a
co.'l3lunity meeting Ci!nter and associated f,ttr.::ilitics and servi(.;(~!::..
l I
FINDING:yursuant to the provisions of City Council Policy K-3 pertaining to
procedures and guidelines to implement the California En'lironmental QualIty
Act,the Environmental Affairs Committee has evaluated the proposed project
and determined that the proposed project will not have a significant effectontheenvironment.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
MITIGATION HfASURES:
S~e attached li~t.
INITIAL STUDY PREPARED BY:City of Newport Beach
INITIAL ~TUDY AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT:3300 Newport Bouleva~d.Newport Beach,CA
DATE RECEIVED FOR FILING:
APl'ENDIX II
March 25,1983IEt.,FU.,d,-..-.:_
Envlro~ental Information ~orm
(To be coapletcd by applicant)
GENI::RAL INFORMATION
\.Nameand address of developer or project sponaer:
Orange Coast YMCA
2.Address or project:2300 University Drive,~rt Il!i:ach
Asaessor'a Block and Lot JrUiiibir --------
3.Name,address,and telephone number of person to be contacted
concern1l\&thlll project:James de Boo~~,2300 l!!:'J!!r..li.tl Ori,"'v"'e...._Newport Beach,CA 714/642-9990 .-_
q.Indleate nu=ber of the permlt application for the project to
which thls fora pertalns:
$.lOuE arid descrllii any otheZ'related peralta and other public
approvals requlred for thls project,lncludlne t~ae required bl
city,reslonall.atate alllS fe<Seral asenclu:I\l!IeIl_nt to Use Permit,
Variances,and ~oastal Commission Approyals
6.Exlstlng zonlng <Slstrlct:__~R~-~I ....
7;'Pl'opoee<suse Of a1te (Pl'oJectf01'Which thls rem 111rUed),
...Addition and alteration to YMCAfacilities,jllCludlNl wes,sj~
PROJECTDESCRIPTION site il!ljlrov_ts,
8.Site sIze.370~x 488'
9.Sq~rc rootage.180,560t sq.ft.
H...~1I..ber of rIoors of construcUon.Two and roof.
I I •AMountof off-street parklne;!'I·ovided.183 cars.
j .,,.ht.Lach plalls.-
I I .Pr"posed ..S.Ch."clu.l1n&,C()llII1ellce.cOnstruct ion Octoller 1983.
J".Associat.ed proJect:.!.
1~.Ant1cipated 1n..re~ental devc!o~.cnt.
••2
l!re31dentlal.
31u3.rantt"ot....peet ..d.
include the nUMber or unite,scnto~uJt.of
aal.prle ..~or rent3.and type or hou3ehold
11.It eOOBere1al.Incl1catc the type,"hether nelghbort,,,oo.e1ty
or rellonally orIented.aquare tootage of 8&le3 area,and loadIng
raelUUe..
16.xr Indu3trlal.Indicate t7Jle.eatlmated employa.nt per ah1rt.and loading tacilitiea.
19.Il Inatltutlonal.Indicate the "Jor lunctlon ....tl.-tedemplo,.ent per &hlrt ••att-ated occupancy.loadIng r.clIltl ....
and e_nlty benefIta to be de ..lved rro-the proJeet.Athletic facilities;
20 employees.•200 occupants at peak use.Serves health and recreation needs of?O.Ir the project Involve ••varl.nce.condItIonal ua.or ....zonlftJ Harbor
appllc.tlon.atate thla.nd Indlcate clearlY."h{the .PRll~tlon.Area.la requlr.d.Variances for front setback and ~Igh .~e attacned varIance
justification.Ar ..the following Item ••pplleable to the proJ ..et or It.erfecta!
01acuaa below .11 It...checked y.a (attach .ddltlonal ahe.ta .a
nn ....rY).
m !!!L
.!....
X
X
X
X
X
21.Chang.In exlatlng r..turea of any bay..t14e1anc1...beach.a.lakea or hl1la.or aubatantial alteratlon orgroundcontoura.
22.Ch.nae In acenlc vlewa or vlaua rrOfll.xlatlngr...ldentlal a ..oll or publlc la"da or roada.
23.Chana.In pattern.aeal.0 ..ChaNCt ...or aeneralar.a or project.
24.SIgnlflc.nt a.ount3 of 30l1d wa3tc or litter.
25.Change In dust ••lIh.3aok ...fumes or odors InviCinity.
26.Change in oce~n~bay,lak~.3tream or ground ~atrrqualityorquantIty..or alt ..ratlon or eXi.~lng drainagepatterns.
X 2·'.Substantial change in f!xlstllip;.o.Jlac or vlblodt.lonlevel~In the vicInity.
X_;>8.Site on tilled land or on "lope or 10 p{'rccnt or Clo,·e.
..L 29.UGe of dhpo"al or potentially hazardous IIl3t<:l'lah•sueh as toxic subatanc ..s.fla...bles or exploslvc3.
••
llj
x ~O.SUD5lalllHtl change 1n (.l'~n~n(j t'lt'""mlJ!il~lv;}l :.l,r ....lct:~
(pollce~f1re,water,:u:wagt..etc.).
x 31.Substant1ally lncrease ros~11 fuel COrt&uMptlon(electrlclty.011,natural ga~.etc.).
32 -Relat10hshlp to a larger project or serl."ofprojects.
~ONHEJII'AL SETTING
x
)3.oeac ..lbe the proJect ,,It.e as it e.-ht.s before t..",proJect.,Inc ll.\cll,,&Infor_Uon on topography.soli st.ablllt.y,"lallt.sand
animal ..,and any cultural,hlstorJcal or acenlc aspeete.OCscrJbe
any exlstlng st.ructurea on the clte.and the use of the structures.
Attach photosrapha of the sJte.Snapshot.s or polaroId photos wll1
be accepted.Existing facility already on site.New con.truction will accomoddte
activities currently conducted outdoors.3~.Describe the surroundlng propertles.IncludlO&Informatlon
on plants and anl~ls and any cultural,hJatorlcal or leenlc
n~pccta,Xndlcat.e the ty~of land use (realclentlal,commerc1al.
eta.),Int.enslty of land uae (one-famJly.apartment houses."hopa,
de parL,"ent st.ores,etc.).and seale of dev"lopment (heIght,
fronta"",aet-back.rear yard.etc.).Attach photo~raphs of the
vicinity,Snapshot.or polarold photo"wJII be accepted.Surrounding
properties multi-family residential and office structures.Senlc views of Back Bay.
~i:~T\~dlbWrowt !nf,~'l-~WaC~rm~'t~iNiMes~n~e~~melBP9I'l'lhl>d
abOvo ana In the attached exhlbJt ..preacl.t Ute data and Infor-
l"3tlon "equlred for thll1 1nltlal evaluatlon t.o Ute beat or ay
abll1ty.and that the facts.state_ntll.and Jnfo .....tlQt\(.resented
are "rue and correct to the best of ay Icnowled&e and ball"l'.
1'01'Orange Coast YMCA
{);t te March 25,1983
•,"••l·..h ...1
~PPE"OIX I
FNVIRnNMENTAL CHECYLIST FeRM
Ellvironm",ntdl CheckliH Forl'!'l
(To Le Co-plf'te:d By lead Agency)
r.Po.1C k y round
1.~ame 0 f Propoflen t
2.Address and Phone ~ua:!.-er of Proponent ----
3.Date of Cheockli.t Submission
4.Aleney Ilequirina Checkli.t
~.JI•••of Propo ••l.if .ppt ie.ble
II.Env ironfl~nt.l Imp.ct.a
(Explanations of all "yell!and ....ayhe"an.v~rs _rt>r~ql;'red on .,ttached.heeta.)
~YES IlAYIIE
I.EArth.IIi 11 the propos.,1 relu 1t in:
I.Unltable earth condition.or inchan,.a in I.oloric .ubltructur ••?lL
b.niaruptioos.diaplace-enta,com-
paction or ov.rco~erin.of the soil?.:L
c.Chan,."in topol.aphy or ground
aurfaee reli.f feature.?..:JL
d.The ~e.tt'uction,covering or aodi-
fication of any unique ,eologic or
phYlical f.ature.?
e.Any incre.~e in wind or vat~r erosion
of soilm.eith~r on or ofl the site!
f.Cho1ngp.5 in deposit ion Or erosion of
beach sanda.or chan~e.in siltation.
depolition or erosion which may MOJify
the channel of •river or stream or th~
Md of thr.ocean or Any biY.ir:'ll~t or
lalre?
•••~·•""VBI.NO5l·l(l,o·..r~'lit people or P~OP"'II I ••
~~olo~,(~lh~zard$such ~~l~'th-
f)".:..,.....1.)IH1-..1idt"".mud ...lJ.l.·...,i:r'J.,..d
f"I".,.0''.iail.lr h.az.lrd.'
y.
2.At.r.\Jill the proposal rt!~ult ~n_
a.Substantial air eml:J.sionll or tlrte:ri-
oration of .abient air quality?
b.The creation of objectionable odors'!
c..Alter.ation of .ir Iftovelllent.moistun,'
or temperature,or ~ny change in
cli~.te.-.ither locally or ~egionally?
J.Water..Will the proposal ~e.ult in:
a..ChaRles in currents.or the COU.SP.oc
direction of vater .ove~entl,in eith~r
~.rine or freah waters?
b.OIanges in absorption r.at~8,f drainage
patt~rns,or the rate and a~ount of
surface runoff?
c.Alterationa to the course of flow of
flood "otero?(x-d.Change in the a~ount of surface ~~tef
in any water body?
e.Disch.rge into surf.ce vater.or in
any ~lter.tion of lurf.ce ~ater
quatity~including but not limited
to teaperature,di ••olved oxygen or
turbidity?
f.Alteration of the direction Or rate
of flow of ground water,?
g.o.an1i.f!'in the quant ity of groul ~
~aterJ,either throu&h direct ~ddi-
tions or withdr.wal$~or through
interception of an 4quifer by cut~
or eltC3V<1CLons?
h.Sub"tanti.l reducc.ion it\the ;U:lOOOI;
of vater otherwise .vail.~te for
public water lu?plies?•I_is.-
i.Exposure of people or property to
wat.r tet~tcd haz~rd,luch as
flooding or tidal w.ves?
14
••
Yf.!.i KAYflF
I
!III
I
I
1...Pl.mt Life.will the proposAl H'5ulc In:
I .a.Olallge in the divt"rsity of r.pt"Cit's.
cr n\JfY\ber of auy speocies of pl",nt~
(includin~trees.shrub"gr~ss.
crops.and aquatic pt.nts)?
b.fi:eduction of the null'be-ra of "ny
unique.rare or en4angered .p~cie.
of plants!
c.Introduction of nev .pecie.of
plants into an .re~)or in a barrier
to the normal replenisbaent of
e~i,ting Ipeciest
d.Reduction in .creAse of any
aaricultural crop?y.-'-
~.Ani~.l Life.Will the propo ••l result in:
\
••Change in the diveraity of .peeie.,or
nUMber.of any .peeie.of ani ••l.
(birda,land ani••la includin,reptile.,
fi.~and shellfish,benthic or~.ni ••••
or in.ect.)?
b.Reduction of the nUMber.of any unique,
rare or end.nsered Ipeciel of ani.als?
c.Introduction of n~v lpecie.of .ni-
mals into an area.or result tn a
barrier to tbe .ietation or .ove-ent
of ani ..ala?
d.Deterio[ation to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
6.Noi.e.Will the P[opol.l r~.ult in:
a.Incrtases in exiltin,noise levels?
b.Exposure of people to aeVr[e noise
levels?
1.Lirht and Glare.Will the propos.I produce
nev 1 Lght or y,h;;re?L
8.Land U~e.Will the propo ••l rr3ult in 3
lubltenti.l alteration of the present or
planned land u~e of an 5real ~
7
iI.Incr~ase in the rate of us~of any
natural resource$?
b.SubsLan[ial depletion of noy non-
renp~~ble natural resourc~?
10.P.is1l:of l'pset..Does the propos.,1 involvf"
a risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardo~s substances (including,but not
liait~d to.oil,pesticide.,che.icals or
radiation)in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
IJ.Popul~tion.Will the propcsal alter th~
location,distribution,density,or growth
rate of ~he human population of an area?
17.~~.Will the proposal affect
exi.ting housing,or create a demand
for additional housinr.?
13.Transportation/Circulation.Will the
proposal r~sult in:
a.r.pn~rntion of substantial additional
vehicular-movement?
b.ff!ects on exi9ting parking
or dem:an~.for ne,~"p~r;kin&?
c.Subst,a,nt(al,~mp~et;~~~~~~~sting
traf1sporta'tion By.teas?
facil iti'!'s,
"y:..
ox..
d.~lteration.;to p~~sent p3tterns of
circulation'or mov~ment of people
and lor ¥oodst x
e.~lterati~ns to waterborne,rail or
air ,tra.fHc?
f.Incre,a_s~_in traffic hazi1rdous to
nO:~r v~hicles,bicyclists or
o:>rlf!'c;tr'if.lns?
II.,.1"ublic !·I"(vicc<."l,.'i:11 the rro,p:osi11 havt;all;f{;-;;'-'~7PO;~r'n':wlt \;0 a nfPd for nc"or
~1t:-!reo1 ,-o_ve(n",~;ntlll ser"iC,f's,in4ny ofth:>
fo'i.r:-'./;I'i.'i!~:"'·,~::>.;
ns
~.Fic~protection?
d.Parks or other re~l'eatiQlnal facilities?
b.Police pcot~ction1
c.Schools?
e.Maintenance of public facilities.
including roads?
f.Other govecnaental .er¥i~e.t
1~.EnerBY.Yill the propos.l re.ult In:
a.Ule of .ub.tanti.l _ta of fuel or
.n.rIY?
b.Subualitial iocr....in deaand upon
exi.tin&.ource.of enerlY.or require
the deve1opll&ntof ...v .OUre..of
....rU?x
16.Utiliti.s.Yill the propo ••l r••ult i••
n••d for DeW.yet ....Or .ub.teati.t .
•It.r.tio...to thafolloviaa utilitie.:
-••Pover orutunl •••?
b.ea..ucie.tio....y.t...?
c.Y.ter?
d.Sever or ••ptict ....?.
••Stora v.t.r drai••S.?
f.Solid V.lt ....d di.po ••l?
17.Hu.sn H.s1th.witl the propo••l r••ult in:
a.Creation of any health hazard or
pot.nti.l healthh.z.rd (eKelUdiril
..ental health)?.
b.Expo.lOr.of people to potenthl
health huard.?
18.Ae.theties.Will the propo.al re.ult in the
oto.tructio..of ...y .ee.ie ~iat.Or vi.vopen
to the public.Or vUl'thepr0Po ••l r....lt·
in the creation of a.....th.tieally
oU ...eh.dt.Opall to public .vi.v?
YES
19.Recreation.Will the pronoaal result
in an iOP4Ct UPOh [he quality or Quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
20.Archeologic-ll/Hisrorical.llilt u ...·
proposal result in ag alteracion of a
sirnificant archeolo&ical or historicdl
site,structure,object or buildinx?
21.~andAto~y FindinX8 cf SiFnificance.
a.Does the project have the potential to
deg~ade tlte quality of,tlte e".,iro"",ent.
aubatantially reduce the Itabitat of a
fiah or wildlife apeciea.cause a fiah
or wildlife population to drop belou
.elf-.uataining,llOYd.,tltreaten to
eli.inate a plant or an1 ...1 eomnunity_..
reduce the nu.ber or re.trice the
ran,e C)f,..•:I'are:-or"ettdanaered plant
or ani ••}or eli.inate important
cx4taple.of the ••jar periods of
California hiatory or prehi.tory?x
b.Does the projec:t Itave the potential to
"ltieve ahort:-,ter...,to the diaaclU$\tage
of long-teno.,envirollllental &""107,(A
.hort-term iapact on tlte environment i.
one which Occ:urain a relatively,brief
.definitive period of time while l ....g-
t ....iapacta will .ndur",vellinto .the
future.)
c.DOes the I'roject Itave.i.pacta whiclt
are individually 1iai~.c1.,but.~'!"'u-
l.tive!y considerable?(Aproject
••1 imPiet on two or .or~I.parate
resources where the i_pact on each
resource i.rel.tiv~ly .~~11,but
""ere the etfact of the total of
thoge~",pa~,t~o~,the,environment is.i,ni Heant.).
d.Does the ,project h.ve.envi~on",.nt.l
,.ffect.vhichwill cau'e .ub.~.nti.l,
lldversf!effects on hum."i11~ein~s~
either directly or indirectly?
~,'
Ill.ni~(:ussion()t fnvironm.el'to1l Evaluation
I\'.f)ptrrmift.ariot1
<";'0 or ~o..pkt~~bYtheJ,.,.d),e,ncy)~.
7.construction of the project will increase tho
glare associated with the existing use.
measures to reduce this impact to a level of
cance will be incorporated into the project.
light and
Specific
insignifi-
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVAWATIQH
1.The proposed project will result in the construction of
new buildings on the existing YMCA site.These struc-
tures will cover areas which are currently V3cant.and
may require grading of the site.since the site \"
adjacent to Upper Newport Bay,erosion of the site could
occur during construction which may result in soil
entering the Bay.Mitigation measures have been
incorporated into the project which will reduce any
potential geologic of erosion impacts to a level of
insignificance.
3.The increase in impermeable surfaces which will result
from the construction of new buildings on the subject
property will increase the peak storm runoff.The
potential impact will be mitigated to a level of
insignificance by measures incorporated into theproject.
6.Additional activity on the site will increase the
potential for noise increases in the vicinity.Mitiga-
ti"n measures addressing noise which will rezult from
me<.;hanicalequipment reduce this potential to a level of
insignificance.The noise which may result from
increased use of the property is considered an insignif-
icant adverse effect.
13.Additional use of the site will result in a demand tor
additional parking facilities.The project will be
required to provide parking adequate for the proposed
use on-site,resulting in no significant environmental
effect.
14.Implementation of the project may increase the demand
for tire protection services.This potential effect
will be reduced to a level af insignificance by mitiga-
tion measures incorporated into the project.
19.Th~project will
opportunities in the
beneficial effect of
provide additional recreational
vicinity of the project.This Is a
the project.
••
10
On th~h:ui,of this inuial eVlil~r:ion;
~I find t~at the pro?Oled project COULD NOT hav~3 ~'gnific3nt ~ff~<t
on the .n"iro~nt.aDd •II[C4TiV£DfC'....UTl(Jtl 'oIlll be pl"~r.Hed.
EX}1 fia4 that al thoulh the propoaed projec t could h.v~•~iJrti f ie.flt
effect on the enviroD_eat.tbere will not b •••i,nificant effc(t i~
thi.c...te becaule the .iti •.-tioQ ....Iurrs de.cribed 01\an .atr..cned
.heet h."e been added to the project.A IlECATIVtIl£CURATlONwi \I
b.prepared.o 1 fiDd the propoeed project !lAY b..,e ••ic"ifiunt effect on tit.
'Dviro~nt.eed .n IMVI'~AL IMPACT.EPO.T i.,~uired.
nata Si,••ture
'or
II ("ote:Tllia h only.,uIIC••ted fo ....
th.ir 0Vll for.at for initial .tudi •••)
Public .,.nc i.••art free to devil.
MITIGATIONMEASURESFORTHE
ORANGE COAST YMCA
2300 University Drive,Newport Beach
Use Permit No.1128 (Amended)
(Attachment to Neqative Declaration dated Apc!l 1,JftU))
1.Thclt development shall be in substantial confOntl.'Jn~fl ....ith the
approved plot plan,f looe plan,elevations and ~'wtion,.,.exceptasnotedbelow.
2.That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shi:r.J)h(!m.creen~d
from University Drive and adjoining properties.
).Thdt all.improvements be constructed as requic(!d by Ordinance and
the Public Works Department.
4.That vehicular access be provided to the eXi5t~nq storm drain
easement access road located at the northeasterly corner of the
parcel to the satIsfaction of the Public Work~~p~rtm~nt.
>.That the on-;'it(~vehIcular .:tnd p~.!de5trian clrcu)o'-1on ~YGtem5 he
subJect to further r~~Vll!"w by the Puhlic WO!'k.s DcP,'SHmI'nt.
(.).ThCtt the cx~stin9 deteriorated drive apron and qlJttf?T on the
University Drive frontage be replaced und~r an ~ncro~c~~~t
permit issued by the Puhlic Works Depart~nt.
J.That prior to the issuance of a bUilding peX11lit.th"applicant
shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Department
and the Public Wor~s Oepartment.that sewer facilities will be
available for the project at the time of occupan~/.
9.That arrangelltents be ""'de with the Public Works Oepartment to
guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements.
9.That a master plan of sewer,water and storm drain facilities be
prepared and approved by the PubI ic Works Depact.J'4ent prior to
issuance of any building permits.
10.Development of site shall be subject to it qradinq ~rmit to be
approved by the BUilding and Planning Depart~~nts.
11.That a grading plan.if required.sh&ll include a complete plan
for temporary bnd permanent drain&ge facilities,to minimize any
potential imP3CtS frpn silt.debris,and other water pollutants.
12.The 9t"adinq permit shall include,if required,a description of
haul routes,access points to U,e site,watering,and sweeping
program desiqned to minl.i~e impact of haul operations.
13.An erosion,Siltation and dust control plan,if required,shall
be submi tted and be subject to the approval of the Iluildinq
Departloent and a copy shall be forwarded to the Call fornla
R....ional Water Quality Control Board,Sant"II....lle9ion.
•
MITIGATION HBASURES
ORANGE COAST YMCA
P..lqe 2.
[4.The veloCl ty of concentrated run-off from the
evaluated and ~rosive velocltieG controlled
project deSIgn.
pc!'.)J'~ct sha!1 ~.:
dS p.,rt of th(~
1'1.That gradlng shall b(;c(..nduct~:d .ill accordance WIth ;';}'I~I~prepared
by a CiVIl .Engineer clnd based on recoanendation3 of iJ.5011
engineer and dn cnq1ncerinq qeologist SubS(~tiNIt.to the
completion of a comprehenslve soi 1 and geologic lnvf!~;Ugation of
the site.Pf:rn~nent reproducible copies of th~"Approved as
Built"grading plans on standard size sheets Sh.,11 rHi furnished
to the Building Depdrtm~nt.
16.That erosiun conteol measures shull be done on any flX,.oor;ed !>lopes
within thirty ddys itft'-~r qradinq or <l!i appro'..ed by to(>Gradingr:ngineer.
'"I.fI.1.1ndsC'';lp*:"a.nd lfciqiltH.HI pldn for the project !.h.:dJ '~('pn"'pared
by <l licensed Idtldsccspe dcchl teet.The 1andf:..iCl:lp~pI an shall
intngratc and phGse the ltmtallation of lo1ndscapirlq wi t.h tt!("
proposed construction schedule.(Prior to the OCcupancy of any
structure,the licensed landscupe architect shdll r,(.rtify to th(>
Planning Dep""rtment that the landscaping-hils b~en lnstllill~d inaccordancewiththepreparedplan).
18.The landscape plan shall be SUbject to the review Of th(.!Slo(lrks,
Beaches and Recreation 04:!par~"'ncnt and approval of th!'!'PlanningOepartment.
19.The landscape plan shall include a D;aintcnance pn'9cam which
controls the use of fertilizers and pesticides.
20.The lands<:upe plan shell placE.heavy emphasis on tht:t use of
drought-resistant natIve vcget~tion and b~irrigated wit.h d
~ystcrn dcslgned to aVoid surfdcC runoff and over-waterIng.
21.The landscape.:plan shall place heavy emphaSIS on fic'O"-r("t.:.rdantvegetation.
22.Landscaping nhall be requlllrly maintainN3 free of weeds and
debris.All vegetation shall he rcgularly trul',ned ilnd kept in ithed1thycond1.tion.
23..That any roof top or other mechanical equipment shall be sound
attenuated itl such tl Manner as to 4chieve a maximum sound levelofSSOb~~t thA pro~~rty lin~.
H:TICATION MeASURES
O!'.ANG£COIlST YHCA
Page 3 ~
24.That any mechanical ~quipment and emergency f)(',;\rU,.r generators
shall be screen~d from view and noise a.ssoc:;ltt~11 with said
installations shall be sound attenuat.ed to accept..-dJh",levels in
receptor areas.The latter sha.ll be htl!'&f:id uf;,{.In the
reca.mmendations of a qualified acoustical engintci.!:1t
1
an!!be
approved by the Planning Oepart~nt.
/s.That all bUildings on the project site shall be {'qtHJjl~d with
fire suppr~ssion systems approved by the Fire Depart~nL
l6.That all ilccess to the buildings be appro"J'cd !.rl the FireDepartl'l"..enl.
27<That fire vehicle access~including the proposed planter is~ands,
shall be approved by the Fire Depart~nt.
2"8.Final design of the project nhall provid~for ~:h(,i .'lfJ,'rporation
of Wdtec-:;avi.ng dC'/lce3 for project lav<ltorie5 ii1t1fJ ,...t.hee water-u51ng fdcilitics.
29.That the lighting system sh.iJll be de~i9ned and mi1in1:,drl(~d in such
a rndnfW,[uS to conceal the light sauce'?and to minimize light
spi t li~ge and glare to the adjacent residential USe'§.The plans
shall bo prepared and sign~d by a Licensed Electric~\i Engineer;
with a letter from the Engineer statin9 that,in his opinion,this requirement has been met.
30.That the final design for the parking area be approved by theCityTrafficEngineer.
31.That ..minill1Umof 181 parking spaces be provided on-site at aUtimes..
l?That a ~~ximum of 19'f (35 spaces)of the parking on-site may becompactp~rking spaces.
33.That no nighttime lighting snaIl be ~rm.itted on the running
track/exercise area,except for pacing lights on t.he runnin9trade
3~.That no amplified pagi.nq systems shall be ~rmitted in any
outdoor «rea on the subject pro~rty.
J,.That the two proposed wall signs shall not be illuminated.
36.It shall be the rE.:sponsibility of the YMCA to aonitor itsprogramsfortheproposedfacilitysoastonotexceedthecapacityoftheproposedoff-street parking lot.If it isdetf~r.mined by the exceed theon-site
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
July 9,1987
at a minimum of five off-stref~t p.arkirl'-j spaces
1 be required in conjunr.tion with th~proposedon.
4.That shall park f)f;-site.
INDEX
Item 110.8
llP1l28
~
!lpproved
ROLL CALL
5.That the Plann or lIlOdify
condi tions of ap val to thb use permit,or
recomend to the Ci Council the revocation of
this use permit,upon determination that the
operation which is the suij ct of this us~permit
cause£injury,or 1s detri to the health,
safety,peace,morals,cONfort,generAl welfare
of the community.
6.This use permit shall
'...i thin 24 months f rom the da te of appro
specified in Section 20.60.090 A of 'he N
Beach Municipal Code.
A.Use Permit No.1128 (Amended)(Public Hearing)
Request to amend a previously approvea use permit Which
permitted the establis'-nt of a YMCAfacility in the
R-I District.The proposed amendment involves •
request to construct a 44,5641 Ilq.ft.addition that
inCludes youth and f ....11y fitness faciHei<os,a qylIllaS-
tiC8 center.a child care center,offices,a c.-mity
Meting center .and an illUlllinated roof top jogging/ex-
ercise area.The proposal a180 includes a modification
t.o the Zoning Code so as to allow:a portion of the
proposed building,an enclosed trash area,and 4 6 foot
high wall to encroach into the required 20 foot front
yard setback,a portion of the required parking spaces
to be cOlllpact spaces,and to allow two wall mounted
identification siqns in excess oC ~sq.ft.
AND
B.Variance No.1140 (Public Hearinsl
Request to aUow alterations and addition.to the
ex~st1nq YMCAfacility ...hich will exc:eed the ...x~
allOW'able buUdinq height in the 24/28 root Height
Li~tation District.
ROLL CALL
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
July ..,1987
I...DEX
Motion x
Parcel No.1 of Parcel Hap j'ln.J-J5
(Resubdivision No.2IS',lOtated at
2JQO University Drive,em th~_~north-
erly side of Univernity Drive,easterly
of Tustin Avenue in the West BAy Area.
ZONE:R-l
APPLICANT:Newport Costa Mesa YMCA
OWNER:Same as applicant
The yYblic hearing was opened in connection with this
item,and Mr.Jamea de Boom,Exee~~iveDirector for th~
Newport Costa Mega YMCA appeared before r~e C~ission.
Mr.de Boom stated his concurr~nce with th~staff
report and the findings and conditionH ()f approval
contained in Exhibit reA."
In response to a query by Conrnissioner Winburn,Mr.de
Boom said that the Newport Costa MeBa YI-1CAoperated
several sites throughout the City and Berv~d some
16,000 persons.
C.-ussioner Debay opined that the completion of the
proposed project would add greatly to youth facilities
in the City.
Commissioner Winburn,in answer to a query by eo.mis-
sioner Debay,explained that becauee of previous
objections to the height of the structure,it was being
lowered 30 inches into the ground,and any further
lowering would be cost prohibitive to the project.
Motion was made to
Variance No.1140
conditions contained
approve Use Permit
subject to the
in Exhibit "A."
NO.1128 and
f indi rlqs and
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard,
the public hearing wns closed at this time.
In recalling t:h"last time thet the proposed project
was heard before the Planning COIIlOli..ion.Planning
Director Hewicker stated ~t often time.institution.
such as the YMCA,churchuB,etc.,have re"ei ved ap-
proval for their reepective projects,and then,due to
various reasons,are unable to ~et the project started
before the 24 month expiration period.TIIltrefore,if
the Planning c.-ission wishes to extend the two year
COMMISSIONERS .•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
.1,,11'9,1987
ROLL CALL
INDEX
AmendllEut
to Motioll
All Ayes
period as it applies to the pro.r.osed PTr ..')tJ~:'-1 'the
COan..isRion could do so ,.,lth 4n amen&r.ent tt";t h,.P-'Otion
on the floor.Mr.Hp.W'icker also clarl t1~iJ that an
extension of the permit period would n<;t ,gffl!!!'c~the
approved Traffic Study which expires cn Ot:i'f'flr.\ber 10,1987.
The motion on the floor was amended to includ~chan9ing
Condition No.42 to read GThat this use-~n'fttt ahall
expire unless exercised Within 36 months from the date
of approval as specified in Section 20.80.0~J A of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code."Motion voted on.
MQI'ION CARRIED.
A.Use Permit No.1128 (Amended)
FINDIIIGS:
1.That the proposed use is consittent \11th thl!'land
Use Elements of the (',.enera.l Plan and tht.Local
Coastal Program,and is compatible with 8urround-ing land uses.
2.That the propoaed number of cOlllpact car spaces
constitutes 19 percent of the parki~r~ulrement$
which is within limits '.!enerally ace~d by the
Planning C.,.,isBion relative to pr_i<>us silllilar
applications.
3.That the propolhtd use of ccepaet parking spaces,
the front yard encroachments L~proposed identi-
fication signa will not,uncler the cirCUllllltanc....
of the this particular "ase,be detrimental to the
health,safety,peace,comfort,and qeneral
welfare of persons residing or workin'.!in the
neighborhood of such proposed use or bs detri-
mental or injUrious to property and iJ:Iprov.....nts
in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the
City and further that the proposed mo<lifications
are consistent wIth the legislative intent of
Title 20 of this Code.
4.That the project will comply with ell applicable
City and State Building COdes and Zoning require-
ments for new building applicable to the district
in which the proposed project is located,except
those itelllll requeatea in conjunction with the
proposed mo<lifications.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
5.That the project lot size confoI1!".s tf.~Uj<.;Zoning
Code are~requirements.
6.That adeq-,..1.IJ.te off-stree~purklnq Mit1 related
vehicular circulation are being prl')1J~ded in
conjunction ~ith the proposed develoIXM~nt.
7.That all eigrtificant environmental conChfnF.>for
the propose:d project have been l.ddreafu~d in a
previously certi fied environmental docuznt.<,llt,and
further,that there are-no additional relHJonable
alternative or ~itigation measures thbt "hould be
considered in conjunction with said project.
B.That based on the information contained in the
previ.m.m Initial Stl ..dy and N'~gatjvfJ D~('l,aration,
the project incorporates stlff1cil1r,~;mitigation
measure£.to reduce pot-':!ntial1y Sigid.f 1r.:ant en-
vironmentil offects,and that the prQject will not
result irl 8.ignificant environmental impl1ct£>.
9.That the approval of Use Permit No.1128 (Amended)
will not,under the circumstances of thlH ~lse be
detrimental to th~health,safety,peac~,morals,
comfort and general welfare of persons residing
and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental
or injurious to property or improvementa in the
neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS,
1.That development shall be in substantial confor-
mance with the approved plot plan,floor plans,
elevations and sections,except as noted below.
2.That all mechanical
shall be screened
adjoining properties.
equipment and tranh areas
from University Drive and
July 9,1987
ROLL CALL INDEX
3.That all improvements be constructed as required
by Ordinance and the Public Work.Department.
4.That vehicular access be provided to th~existinq
storm drain easement aCcess road locAted at t.he
northeasterly corner of the parcel to the satis-
faction of the Public Works Department.
July 9,1987••
ROLL CALL INDEX
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
5.That the on-site vehicular and :~Hl('(;it:ri '-lL ci rcu-
lation syster:-,s he subject tr.!t c;rtb::r revie""
by the Publ ic \o:taks Dep,.'uttr,·\t,t.Hll,;l'.;t.':.I.ng thf'
design of the proposed serv1cp dTiv~WdY~.
6.T:'1at prior to the oCC\.i.parH~;Y ')i t.hf~proposed
project,the circulatioTJ &yt~tettl improvements
described in the Traffic Study {lC1U~dJI..pril.198J
on Page 10 prepared by Jt:F f:nqlrl.eerin9,!nc.,
ahall have been accomplished unless subsequent
project approvals requi r~modi t teat iona then~·to.
(The ultimat~deRign of the 1~tcr"ectio~~hal1 be
subject to the approval of the City Traffic
Engineer).
7.That the f:~:isting det.eriorated dx-ive "FTon and
gutter on the Univer!;;it.y [)rlV~~fr,r,nf:i"l •.·he re-
placed under an encroi\chmt?nt pf'Jrr-lit 1 r~:il.l(.·d by the
Public Work.s i1epartment.
8.That prior to the issuance of a buildin'-;i po;~rm.it,
the applicant shall demonst.rate to th~cbt-isfac-
tion of the Planning Department and thl!Public
Works Department,that sewer faciliti.rtz will be
available for the yroject.at t~he tiJ!'l"~of occu-
pancy.
9.That arrange_nts be IMde with the Public Worh
Department to guarantee satisfactory completion of
the public improvements.
10.That a master plan of sewer"water and 1;torm drain
facilities be prepared and approved by the Public
Works Department prior to iss~ance of any building
permits.
11.Development of sHe shall be subject to a grading
permit to be approved by the Building and Planning
Departments.
12.That a grading plan,if required,shall include a
complete plan for temporary and p."nMnent drainage
fac~lities,to minimize any potential impacts from
silt,debris,and other vater pollutantg.
13.The grading permit shall include,if r"'luired,a
description of haul routes,access:pointn t.o the
s1 te,watering,and sweeping progr1Ulldeo1gnld to
minimize impact of haul operations.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
14.An ero!'iion,siltation and du~t:Cfmtrol t,lllltl,if
required,shall be submitt.ed Md]be c.;L;l,jf~~;'~.to the
approval of the nuildir:;J .t;f~f.ilutm.er:t {:J;l:r!tl co-py
shall be forwardf!c to the Cljl ifon:i",j.'''-''q1()na.1
Water Qual i ty Control F:,Qard,S~.f;t.a l~nt.1 ~.{~(J ir;'n.
15.The velocity
project shall
controlled as
of concentrated nUi-off fnlm the
be evalr.o:ated .and ~rogive vklocities
part of the project degig~.
16.That grading shall be c()nd~ctl2d in acCOrdiH}Ce with
plans pre.t)ared by a.civil Engim:er alnd hased on
recommendations:of a $oi1 enqiru:~er art-d ~n enqi-
ne~rin9 geologist subsequent to th€completion of
a comprehenmlve soil dr,d g~oloqic inv€'stiql1lltion of
the site.Permnent r~priJoducl.ble copies of the
"Approved I!Hi Built'·grading plllnrn f)fl,r<J.tandard size
sheets shall be f,.;.rnished to th~)BuDdin')n~part-
rr.ent.
17.That erosion control measures shtlll be done on any
exposed slopes within thirty dbYS after grading or
as approved by the Grading Enqine~r.
18.A landscape and irrigation plan for th~project
shall be prepared by a licen""d l ..roa.cape archi-
tect.The landscape plan .hall integrate and
pha....the installation of lar>dacapifl'l with the
propoHd construction schedule.(Prior to the
occupancy of any str ..cture,th<!lic""Hd landsc~
architect shall certify to the Planning D~rtment
that the landscaping has been installed in accor-
dance with th~prepared plan).
19.Th~landscape plan shall ~subject to the review
of the Parks,Beaches and Recreation t>epar-tment
and approval of the Planning Department.
20.The 1andscape pla.n sha 1.')
program which controls tt~
pe9ticid"s.
Include a t>taintenance
use of fertilizers ar~
21.The landscape plan shall place heavy emphasis on
the use of drought-reaistant native vegetation and
be irrigated with a symtelll designed to avoid
surface runoff and over-watering.
22.The landSCApeplan shall place heavy emphasis on
fir,,-retardeflt ",e'1eUtion.The final landscapa
-25-
July 9,1""'1
ROLL CALL
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
July 'j,1987
INDEX
plan shall r-.e dE:signed gO as tv In'''fHdf-,.t.he
landscaping for ~creening p;;.rposes."ll~j i~(':r.t t.0
the Anniversary Lane Tz dct,and t,0 1:.r,rt!llg~ttoe
wall and landscaping at the north'''''f~ut~lr 1'I t:orn~r
of the site whf::rf~the foot traffic i:,or:curring,
so as to pr~ch.de !>€rson5 from gair~irlfj <JcceS5 at
this l'Jcation.
23.Landscaping shall be regularly maintahi~d fn ..e of
weeds and debris.All vegetation sha}1 be req-.;-
larly trirr:ned and kept in a healthy conditie:n.
24 ~That any reof top or other mechanica 1 ~qt.ii~nt
shall be sound attenuated in such .\mann,-~r as tr-,
achieve a r.aximum sound level of 55 aHA at th1!!
property line.
25.Th(lt.a"1Y mechanictl f.:quiprnerlt.and cmf:rrJI~n("y r.....J'4~r
generators shall b,.~£>creened from view and nr.Jis.o
associated with said installations shall be ~Y~nd
attenuated to acceptc.ble levels in recf!!)tr)r 9rf'!'Zl&.
The latter shall hf:lbased upon the recOD'Imf:tloll.tions
of a licensed engineer or a professional enqlnp-er
practicing in acoustics,and be a:pprovif!dby the
Planning Department.
26.That all buildin<3"on the project .1t"shall be
equipped with fir~suppression sy9temR approved by
the Fire Department.
27.That all access to the building be approved by the
Fire Department.
28.That fire vehicular access,including th~proposed
planter islands,Shall be approved by thp.Fire
DepartIr.ent.
29.Final design of the project shall p~ovide for the
incorporation of water-saving devices for project
lavatories and other water-using facilit.ies.
)0.That the lighting "y"tem within the structur"and
in the off-street parking lot shall be designed
and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the
light source and to minimize light spillage and
glare to the adjacent residential uses.The plans
shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Elec-
trical Engineer,with "letter frOlll the Engineer
stating that,in his opinion,this requireroent has
been met.
COMMISSIONERS
ROLL CALL
July 9,1987
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
INDEX
31.That th~final design for the pa '-".l ro'f i!t"l:a be
approved by the City Tr;lffic Engin~-!(_'r.
32.That 0.minlmwi'l of 181 parking spac(~:::.bt,provided
on-site at.illl.t~f;.
33.That the location of the compact patk i ri'1 spaces
shall be redistrib~ted within the parking lot to
the satisfaction of the City Traffic ETiqin~(.'r.
34.That.five handicap parking spaces r}hhll b~pro-
vlded on-site unles!;otherwise perl!'l tted by the
auilding Department.
35.Thnt a maxImumof 19't 05 spaceo)of tho parking
un-8it~adf be compact parking SyaCch.
36.That the service driveways shall lw r;t~bject t.o
further review and approval of the City ~:ngineer
and City Traffic Engineer.
37.That no nighttime lighting shall be ~rrnitted on
the running track/exercise area,except for pacing
lights on the running track.
38.That no pc=ent amplified pagIng ~y.t""g shall
be permitted in any outdoor area on the subject
property.
39.That the two proposed wall signs allall not be
illuminated.
40.It shall be the responsibility of the YMCAto
monitor its prog~ams for the proposed facility 50
as to not exceed the capacity of the proPQsed
parking lot.If it is determined by the Planning
Department tfu'1t programs tlxceed the on-site
parking spaces,they shall be modified by the YMCA
in a ~~nner approved by the Planning Department.
41.That 4 gate shall be required across the driveway
to cloYe off the narking lot during the non-busi-
ness hours.
42.That this use permit shall expire unless exercised
within 36 months from the date of approval as
specified in Section 20.80.090 A of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code.
R<X..L CALL
,July 9,1987•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
INDEX
Variance No.1140
FINDINGS:
1.That there are exceptional or extnanrdlnary
circumstances applying ...0 the land,building,an~
use proposed.in this application,which circum-
stances and conditions do not generally apply to
land,building,and/or uses in the same dlntrict
inasMUch as the YMCA's gymnasium requires specific
dimensions and height that do not ~pp~y to adja-
cent properties in the vicinity.
2.That the qranting of a variance to the height
requirement is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of substantial property right B of t.he
applicant,inasmuch as without the height,the
YMCA could not offer programs neceusory to 8ustain
itself and serve the community.
3.That the establishment,maintenance,and operation
of the use,property,and building will not,under
the circumstances of the particular CAS8,be
detrimental tc the health#safety,peace,comfort,
and general welfare of persons residing or ~orkinq
in the neighborhood of such proposed use or
detrimental or injurious to property and 1Joprove-
menta in the neighborhood or the general welfare
of the City.
CONDITIONS:
1.That de'Jelopme:.ltshall bE in substant.ial confor-
mance with the approved plot plan,floor plans,
revised elevations and sections,except as noted
below.
2.That all eppl1C"able conditions of Use Permit No.
1128 (Amended)shall be fulfilled.
J.That the height of the parapet walls shall be
limited to that required by COde,is 42 inches.
The proposed stairwells shall be no higher than
the approved height of the parapet WAnS •
•••
CITY'OF llEWPOR'I'Br.ACH
PI.A!flI!!fG Dl!PAR'I'HE!lT
PLk~~'IEW P~QUEST •
Date June 16,1987XADVANCEPLAlmINGDIVISION
X=PURLIC WORKS DEPARTHENT
X TRAPFIC <:IIGUlE!':R
X nPE DEPAR1"MEllT
X:Pl.A!1 REVIEW DIVISION
P~~.KS &RECRP.ATION
--POLICE DEPARTMENT
-HARmE Sl,PETY
X GRADING
PLAN'S ON F'H.F.in j·'r,AllrlING DEP'!'.
APPLICATION OP:Newport Costa Mesa YMCA
FOR:Variance 110.1140
REQUEST TO:AlloW'alterations and additions to the eXistlwj Newport Costa
Mesa YMCAfacility which will exceed the maY-imumallowab1"building height in
the 24/2B 1'00t Height Limitation District.
wr..ATION:2300 University Drl.ve
REPORT ~EQUESTED BY:~1une 26,JrJB7
CO~~IssrONREVIP.W:,luly 9,198~
COM!lElITS:_
Signature Date
Notice 18 hereby given that the Planning e.-J.ssi=of the City of Newport Ilea"'"wilLho14.public hearing on theapt>lication of ",CJ'
____________for USEPERMIT,RESUBDIVISIOIf,_
VARIAJlCEc--AIlE!lDIlEh'T T.ENTATIVETRACT1lAP 0'I'HERc-_
on property located at~_
Request to _
r--1rhis project has been reviewed,and it has been determined that it ift categorically exemptL.Junder the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
DNOTICEIS REREBYFURTHERGIVENthat a Negative Declaration has bean prQpared by the City of
Newport Beach in connection with the application noted above.Th..Negative Declaration
states that,the subject developlllent will not result in a significant effect on the
environment.It is the present intention of the City to accept the Negative Declaration and"
supporting dOCUlllents.This is not to be construed as either approval or denial by th"City
of the subject application.The City encourages IIleJIIbersof the'general public to revi_and
commenton this do~ntation.Copies of the Negative Declaration and SUpporting documents
are available for public review and inspection at the Planning Department,City of """POrt
Beach,3300 Newport BouleVard,Newport Beach,California,92658-8915 (714)644-3225.
NOTICEIS HEREBYFURTHERGIVENthat an Environmental Illpact Report has been preparod in
connection with the application noted above.It is the present intention of the City to
accept the Envirolllllental Illpact'Report and supporting dOCUlllents.The City enCOUrages
llIellIbersof the general public to review and COIIDenton this dOCUlllentetion.Cop!es of the
EnVironmental Impact Report and SUpporting doeuIIents are available for public rev!_and
inspection at the Planning Department,City of Newport Beach,3300 Newport Boulevard,Newport Beach,California,92658-8915 (714)644-3225.
NOTICEIS HEREBYFURTHERGIVENthat all significant environmental concerns for the propo3ed
project have been addressed in a previously certified enviro""",ntal dOCUlllent,and that the
City of Newport Beach intends to U8e said document for the above noted project,and furuner
that there are no additional reasonable alternative or aitigation measures that should be
considered in conjunction with said project.Copies of the previously prepared
environmental document are aVailable for public review and inspaction at the Pl"nning
Department,City of Newport Beach,3300 Newport Boul,vard,Newport Beach,C8~ifornia,92658-8915 (714)644-3200.
Notice 1&hereby further given that said public hearing will be held on the day of==-=-.'i.---:::::;1ge1,at the hour of,~p.a.in the Council Chamberaof the Newport Beach,
City H~ll,3300Jlewport Boulevard"Jlewpor.Beach,california,at vlIicll tiae and placo My
and all peraons intereated ...y awear and be heard thereon.1I'0r information call (714)644-3200.
George Ochsner
1834 leeward r..m..
NeIoport Beach,ca 92660
439-301-08
Richard Dinkins
2416 Ur~versity Dri>~
NeIoport Beach,Ca 92660
439-301-19
Nahnood Sharef f
2926 Silver lane
Nc""f;ort Beach,ca 92660
119-252-08
First Jlmerican Trust Co
P.O.!lOX 267
Santa Ana,ca 92702
439-301-09
Earl 5aw-jcr
535 Via Lido Sotrl
NeIoport !le<lch,Ca 92660
439-301-20
Jeffery Pierose
408 Fda Street
8ois",Iel 83702
119-252-10
John Wells
5720 14Ot:h Street
Bellevue,wa 98006
439-301-21
rear E.a'l1and
2422 University Drive
NeIoport Beach,ca 92660
439-301-10
Fdward 'Ihrum
2291 Golden Circle
New£.ort !le<lch,ca 92660
119-252-11
Doris M Hope
2416 University Drive
Ne\-.port !le<lch,ca 92660
439-301-11
Bank of Anerica
801 N.Main Street
Santa IIn....,ca 92701
439-301-22
sally Brown
2285 Cc1den Circle
NeIoport !le<lch,ca 92660
119-252-12
Brian I'b:d
2900 Paper lane
Newport Beach,ca 92660
119-251-13
Grace A.Jordan
2402'University Drive
Ne1opor l !le<lch,('..a 92660
439-301-12
Hla 'Iin
2281 Golden Circle
Newport !le<lch,ca 92660119-252-13
Richard Carr
2904 Paper lane
Newport Eeach,Ca 92660
119-251-14
G1.ad'jS Banis
2404 Universtiy Drive
Nell/pOL l Beach,Ca 92660
439-301-13
Cynthia B=-m
2275 Golden Circle
Newport Beach,Ca 92660
119-252-14
Richard Beckner
2909 Silver l~
Newport Beach,ca 92660119-252-03
John Sigrist
1801 Glenwood Lane
-Newport Beach,ca 92660
439-301-14
Patricia Mazur
2269 Golden Circle
Newport Beach,ca 92660
119-252-15
.Jotm Wright
2408 University Drive
.Newport Beach,Ca 92660
I 439-301-15I;,~"
Hobert Holland
2905 Silver lane
Newport P.r""ch,ca 92660119-252-04
Ronald Gem
2261 Golden Circle
Newport !leach,ca 92660
119-252-16
.~len M•.Jotmson
2410 University Drive
Newport Beach,Ca 92660
<439-30i-16
Richard teyton
2900 Silver lane
Newport Beach,ca 92660
119-252-05
Janes COOper
2253 Golden Circle~~:i_~Ileach~"ca 92660
·.:::J o..v-'_•:J6-<-~.1"a~,
::t"'~A./,;?..j/(4i/0~.-e __·,.r rJ .........-.,,--'!-7'..';-:"".~--"/1'-(_c.(.....Jv.._...(C!-T.(
1.'07/,-
D.IJ!!e
Golden Circle
Newport Beach,Ca 92660
119-253-02
Ara <Erezoglu
2250 Golden Circle
Newport Beach,Ca 92660
119-253-03
Dunacan /ot:Intosh
P.O.BOX1337
Newport Beach,Ca 92660
119-253-04 /'
Millicent Rolle
2268 Golden Circle
Newport Beach,Ca 92660
119-253-05
John Van:±an
1724 W.Ne'lIpOrt Hills Drive
Newport Beach,Ca 9'~660
119-253-06
John !-bsher
2231 Aniversary Lane
NewportBeach,Ca 92660
119.,.253-07
';{';\:,l'}"_.;'~::"._:,_~',::/",::,;::,"::~:,:;"-',:,
TiITot:hy Shepard
2215 Aniversary lane
Newport Beach,ca 92660
119-253-08
•
......----•"
.;.,~.~~-:-','/
~,"-"-6.,
}..•.i
"'.
I
4.L
"
""I Ir"'"
\
",',j'
..,:,'{~!i.",.,'
\',.'.'~,
I I",'.\"
"r".'"
,
"
~.co''Q.Dl#
'''''..·~~I..,-tll
':D &.-;a .......r.:I
r---
;.--,'","~""".,.~,..,.7'..-~....::h..,,,..
U'iP~,"~~.~.,J".,,-
(...w.D kCl"6 .."!",,I,
I .!..""",~.:-.:.'~"'.-r:.:-'"",;,';:;."c ;;....~~-'""....~:..~.~'
~',,~~,~_~."-"I"t ~....,.-~"!.'!,,·:;J"S '"N<.;
"P-~-~",''''-',',,....-t:,
t4.1.~"".~~_',>""".......~~,,-,
i
L
•,
t-,.\',~--~,--;-,,~-
''').-....,_"..,J C;~.::--:--;C~-~-.,..j'~.f-----SITE PLA!It.""",...~,A04"HfQlI-f#fTIAL eoTYPICALMASONRY/GLASS'FENCE~
__.L......._
Jj
.,.,'---='--'J~.-;.e ;<;:
C<:C""""~_--.;,,:~,'..:-.'(,'"-~"'.......,..;:;'-~
'e'Ai...
I :>·J..:;....e-o-_=.
_",..:J5G.:.;>e......
,I
!!.~c ......,""_-"""~'.>"""'--"'!?'..s-G",
~-.!!"C""'c..:._.:;<l.AA"''''5
.....,,,",,,,-,,,,,',.O-.-.o.o_c't 'S;:;o;<'.E.=-"'",,-•..:,..,:,s:;.,.>;:;.~,·"G5 ....oo-=A·~
:1'CD_,·~..,~"-..,,YA~~:;G
MAP
,,
/
/,
I
.(
/
vll'!O
Nevvport 1'9'Costa Me5<'"l
YMCA
I·.~,'
,..'
.,
"l;'",,'
BUllDINGB BUILDING C I
II
I
I,,,'.'",'"".",-~"1"'"""''''''''''''~'''-"''",'''"',n.,'.I ~::·;t~l~~·;~::;:~h
'U'•.F.J _"W-\l;:'~;
BU1LDlNCI D BUilDING E
(/
lL_
.'-
2 HOUR WALL
~~2:~.-.~_CC.
un.J'.
.~."
~"""'''''''i_'''''f'"""_''''''1\'.~~J'''''&''.!~'"
-·t ......""
',-'.'
•.,
.11-2,'occ,.,n s.',
;,:ftL~~_Ef':':......~':~'~
-t:~..~<_~~Jlt~l~~C_'j
"~'~"<>'",!,;:,;~,;..~i~:~
-;.;'........n.,i,,&·..;,.,...
,-,[","..<4"-~,..,'"{<qt;<.
•,
I ,
I BLDGrIE ~,I
I ,
BUILDING GBUILDINGF.............~
TYPE V-1HR WI SPRINKLER SUBSTITUTION
BUILDING A
_,369'"'UN,a,sO\!
'0,100
·II~I~~.J '~
O"J,OINO[
F"I\l F.OO"AcW'l
IECO';~flOO''~TU"TOTAL.tlVAl
HPE "1"',"C'MtE
~~~:';~mm[I;~~:';~:J :SI._OIlS
lOlOl "lO"'~Ll~
l~lAl ACIUAL
IlPE H _"~!:':!:~~~u
~
FIRSI Flool ACWA,
S[CO"OHM A~lU'l
lOlA'"10"
1"[,,1 ,,''LLO",~LE
Z 110"T."tAI£I~OS,")
l U'O I.C~[A\EI\~~.•_ll :Il~.
lOlA'A,l'O"IalE.
I;'~'''.{-"'",-r..."
"'")•,.,500
Olll'II~I""'«"~""".
,'''',-;,•,0",,'",.,':""-,>\[1".)',",
,,""I'[""E (S;·',.Lllv",'"r.,,·,[;l._OIII
i,)~",',r "~'"..~
r1RST r~OOR ACIUAl1(&0.0 flOOR .o.clLlAl
;OIAl-At;I~Al
TIP!I-I tm AllOWAllt
~lTlIRl IWCR(Al[Il~~,~1 ,Z TARO I.CREASE (SL)I;,•.!l :15 •.oas •.llS
lDIAlAUOIIA6LE .
>Cco,""",'I.,.-'.j""'_'(lu"
I"l '-1 ","o.""''''''l''''r'\l''",.",'''~1,,'l>Sl ':,'.'1
IUlA'''LC'W<a\[
".Cl,S •.•"
.~.':"'~~:-;"=-iS=~J,..,..J",_.,.......O!£..&~~<;J ..."'-I1!....,;l.t!ol ~"Iioa ....t"'"","-",-,C ...e-co ~~'".',,"',.B ~~~,,~,.._<;'«...-Ti'.-~~,-_~_%~l!:&_<UIa
."'~•','",_"'"'.-.~"••.L •.,__.-_.~~.,__,.,"£<,_-..a ".."'""'-.
·ct·
.j
~",u,tJ
oUL OCCUPANCIES NOT flOTED ARE ...2
CONSTRUCTION II TYPE V-1NR WIn!
AUTO.ATIC FIRE "RINKlERS SUISTITUTION
_",EXISTntlJ;t HR IlIN COHSTRUCTIOH'
~=1 lift IUN U.TED UtCLOSUR,
R ""1/:1 HOUfl RATED DOOR-ASSEf:KU
----a HOUR,RATED W+LL
.f-
f\o\!i TOTAL BUilDING:6S,788 S.F.
C3 •"••••"•~"
~•;
cl ~<•
~
~~"
~
•
CI)0 ~.
(.).~
~~'~•~
~
0
~"u
~
~~~••~0
~"~0"~"
'loV.~,t'$o
....,:....'~I'-O'
!
BUILDING 8 II:
I:
BUILDING C BUILDING 0 <
r
2 HOUR WALL
-....,
I
I
I
I
II
I
I•.L
•Cz9~l('i'c1-,-
--""--'--~
PASSAdE:'JAY mn ...-1:
-i -t ,lit •
It ;~'-.-E~t:;:::=::===:':.J
,-•~og•
2 HOUf>WALL
i'I
~
j
j-_..-....-""~'
...
I
I
II
I
I
I
I:
I <
.",-
2 HOUR WALL
2 HOUR WALL r'~
'~C\;;A ~-,,~~;o''''''
,""",'''••<-.;,",::,.;:..-.,,'
BUILDING A I
II
I
BUILDING C BUILDING 0)<>
TYPE V-1 HR W /:SPRINKLER SUBSTITUTION
/"",-''''.,
-;".'..-...,;:.....~'-""..~"'~,.o_~~_"-<..:P:fi9 f"..V ~«"-O<}'.~"'"vr.:~"":<
".1".-:'..",~"-....1·....."'--,;,_'-.._~.,.....~-.._..";G~_..o-.?
8U1LOlNQ E
",'.;-.g""fo'/'ll,.I
croup 1 b,I
-,.~~-:.-~.~'~H";----"'''r r ;:~:·'...f"f
I'I Be.-t
2 HOUR WALL __~::Pl',~t:.:.~;,-:;[.~
I -"7 a.F.I'
I___J
\;.1.
2 HOUR WALL I
aLbO I
E I
I
I
BUILDING F BUILDING G
"<>
ALL BECOND FLOOR ODCUIl"NCIES A!lE .~2
TYPE V-1 Hit CONSTRUCTION WI AUTOMATIC
FIRE ....RIMlttEl!SUBSTITUTION
_..EXIITING 1 Hft MIN.CONSTRUCTION
c:.::::::I =1 HR llIIN RATED ENCLOSURE
R =-t 1/1 HO"'"IIATElI DOOR ASSE ••LY
----2 HOUII RATED WALL
SECONP FLOOR PLAN
J J J-I'
-\-~~lHlol'!/.etl~
t--C::~I!~~"l"I!lllrw;l
H6tlT Plmf'.e,"'U e~L.~
+--f;:l\~~..-.l.c,o.~
NORTH ELEVATION
~'"'----_._--_____...:.l~,-_of --r---''';\I "--_~---v-"11 ::1 \.-I
'~--
~'
~I ~I-83 ESt83 ill EB .)J iQ;I--I .:rr-----i-,I ."";Fjil',I-L ..A ,'-i-_.L 10-
~.I-~t-.I:'J J ..&.
~1!l!8i~-;'~N';P:~~.-CNj0P'1'•..-----
I'lCli 1u.u~II·""
~ot l.oo."'.
WEST ELEVATION·NORTH WING WEST ELEVATION 2
,
·~I·?J~i"~
_______---.J
SOUTH ELEVATION 3
1
I.
N7!l>;A/'>U,.EOXlUIOlt-_W1N~1t'~
~lI4'tillW..~Ic:~...yt"l;fJ
j1'''.J~....-nH:7c::f''J.1 C1lo ~
,r..u.._~~qMUl.l.lCN"
WtL.L.~~t1PJ".A"'~
.'L.,
,IIF---j---'-
SEE SiiEE1S';'--.:4-"~:6 FoiiiiRiiAL-CODE"sii",iARV'1.:...>..__'_•••,,.__.,•_.•__.o._~"''-,_....'•._
EAST ELEVATION,4
~'&"!tHl
~"I~ol-".
T
:
"~
--~.~,
1"~'!iilP'
r!
-,,
,-!\
I
II;I
!I jlJ
,.i
I
~---I
u ..-'''Sl~;........
,
:e--~oiA~WAL..<...
Ir-----+
I~~D ~c
~.U+'5Q.FT..,.,.~'J,,'I
,~"i1'6 f!;tllL-DI-.la
IG,~~:r.
I'"1t!!5oH fi..O:tl:~.?
~.£lW CO,1W'J.II.I11Y ;ae.tl~
IT,~7l::'$Q.Fj,
~~N.•
r-,-,r-,r-----;,..------,.-10 --tl--"*"---11---tt--L ._
n=---------
",-
,-
.-l.,
I 'I
'-'
'1t:lTI\.\.o-,q"!;'
--,.,
.......;;:.'.:'
•~~~..-_.
\.
~'.,.
--,.,-'-'~~-'~'~-r'~'~-l-~
....
,..
--_.-~'I'I ~tI
1
c".."
l
"-~
ith·~---..
{\';~~;::,
~;~t,;~~fitf_:',.::,.
.'.'"v
',',,
'"'"
SJ~(;ONJ)l~I..()()U·l)I ..AN
F
il'
I,
i
'-,;r
c
-----...--I
-_.-~_--
\.1!o<99tJ~
RCH<rle /t:I.~
1'!'l_"lC!'~I!.j.,J.<:lIl'!'l~--D E F G
n
seAI..}J
I
:~
E'Jl:.:.:..l
I,.I.'I
._.
()I~J\.:N(.J~
I
.T r-
:I -[.',..,
•I
.,I
i I'.I I
--.------'1,.;...:__-l
E]'t-,...~~~-;;:j
.---.~
'W
1
r-
.;-,,
I
__....._.i.
1I
(.
;....
r,."......
*
)J
".."."
rltt:>!"'l"!tII\.
.""'-
CT_I_-I ~
1--1 1-.~""'-,Jr,r-..".
"""'"-=...--
',"'.:..'.,"'
..',..............
~~~.•.."...•.
tT
~;
,.
!..
\:
ti::r;,:
V"'"
it>
I.
\I
•'I.
0·...;
--,--~-.-_.
r~.
-==_-:-~~~~::__:.I ~~=.::~."0=-~-~""'.:-,.---=.-----===-~--
.lllllll.II'III!1 !!'W
'.'
,"
j
.(~()J.,srI'·Y)I(~l-'
...~,".I
~~~r-::~~.~<~....'~..
:.'
','
",.,.:,'
,\.
~__~_-----
.....,...,.-"
•
Ce05S ;'-Jl~t~
~&.4IooC.y..~.1 ......·.-·-
rJ/'."'ij.1 ILll ~=======~t''ions--
.'!
#tf/,.
-----
,•
S""L to ,...,~
I:1.i!
....U,._1'1 ....."""'..
u.,,.",'
T"l""l'r .........,.
I
I-rt
.'"""!.~---lI=~-~
!
0e.C"'i"IOI~
_'t_."_~·~;.t.~"
.....
"',
),."
.;'-:..,
"',.
,';'.,
.,'.
!
'I ,-,
It ,---
I-'----~-_..-._.---J~A ..:,'all'crl,
:
IT u
,.
11\-J "'--..~,--.I I I ,
,I',I.I ,
"I I I I
I !
':j ""......,.-......-....,"',.,,0.,.""-""'->-"-'--..~I'.,"
='
-.~-r-.,
j,,@IJI.,
[.'"",j "';'",\<>'•.:0'
,j,.,"i''''.':.'I .,L.,
II'••'
L ,.~."l'."•
!.,,,
r
..
---EEl-·'..··""i.
-I
-ft!
I,
!
~
I
~_~~·lmI
I 'I
__11·"·~~)__
•
t-_·-a 11
..~-~"
f
..
F--=-f:
,Iii.':'
~=--,....
t-~,,
I--~
,•t_____._~'~fi:~_,C&-~___I.:o'·Q·
ll======t~I'""
11I
I
T 1
-J-
10,:•.
l•:;1 :I-:=r'..flll .',
-~
I .,I'11 ,"I,
f--~\0 II "'/1
~
.'·0 I/0 ,
'~
-,
i,--.
~~m
,II
\<>'.".81)1...
I
r -t
-UI [8
"
.~:1;-.I.e,~~:
J'"11~,ij ~!
I I 1IiI
I !~.lfl
1 ,......,~I
s-.
"
•
,
I
I!
._~_"".-.,,-
""'r
,~'
-.i'
~
I
'--,
,
'.:
'...
"~"'","1."')-"
,>;...~':.)"":,
,~.:';::'::1t.'.
'.~',."'~':':'....'
:,;.
;~'
'.,
....':'