The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03_AT&T Small Cell SLC4735 Minor Use Permit and CDP_PA2019-108CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT August 13, 2020 Agenda Item No. 3 SUBJECT: AT&T Small Cell SLC4735 (PA2019-108) Minor Use Permit No. UP2019-027 Coastal Development Permit No. CD2020-101 SITE LOCATION: Public right-of-way, City streetlight number SLC4735, center median of Avocado Avenue at the intersection of Kewamee Drive APPLICANT: New Cingular Wireless, LLC CARRIER: AT&T Mobility OWNER: City of Newport Beach PLANNER: Joselyn Perez, Assistant Planner 949-644-3312, jperez@newportbeachca.gov LAND USE AND ZONING x Public Right-of-Way (ROW) PROJECT SUMMARY A minor use permit and a coastal development permit to allow the installation of telecommunications equipment for a small cell wireless facility on a City-owned streetlight pole. Project implementation will be fully contained within the public right-of-way on Avocado Avenue and includes the following: (1) Removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight; (2) Installation of a small cell wireless facility that consists of four remote radio units, a raycap disconnect, and an omni-directional antenna within a 12-inch diameter equipment shroud. This equipment would be fixed to the top of the replaced streetlight pole for a maximum height of 27 feet, 5 inches; and (3) Establishment of new below-grade support equipment adjacent to the streetlight. RECOMMENDATION 1)Conduct a public hearing; 2) Find this project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15302 and 15303 under Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction) and Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), respectively, of the State CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment and the exceptions to the Class 3 exemption under Section 15300.2 do not apply; and 1 AT&T Small Cell SLC4735 (PA2019-108) Zoning Administrator, August 13, 2020 Page 2 Tmplt: 07/25/19 3) Adopt Draft Zoning Administrator Resolution No. _ approving Minor Use Permit No. UP2019-027 and Coastal Development Permit No. CD2020-101 (Attachment No. ZA 1). BACKGROUND x Over the last several decades, with the invention of new technologies like smartphones, tablets, and smartwatches, connectivity for wireless devices drove telecommunications companies to deploy new equipment to allow for the transmission of more data. Wireless data demand continues to grow, outpacing the capacity of the existing telecommunications infrastructure. x Small cell technology, like that proposed, is now being deployed across the country as a new solution to resolve soaring data demand and make coverage more reliable. In contrast to traditional macro wireless sites (i.e., cell towers), small cells are able to advance a stronger signal over a small radius by the means of minimal equipment on existing infrastructure. The result is limited visual intrusion and the enhanced wireless network capacity which residents, businesses, and visitors demand. x The City of Newport Beach’s (“City”) regulatory review of wireless telecom siting is limited by three federal laws: The Communications Act of 1934, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“Telecommunications Act”) and a provision of the Middle-Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (“Spectrum Act”). Together, these laws aim to facilitate and stimulate wireless infrastructure development and restrict certain aspects of local authority in review and permitting of wireless telecommunications facilities. On January 14, 2019, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Declaratory Ruling and Order FCC 18-133 (“Order”) became effective. This directive further removed barriers to wireless infrastructure deployment and established accelerated timelines for processing small wireless facility applications at the local level. It also limited the City’s rights as a property owner, restricting the type and amount of fees the City can collect for private use of public property. x On February 12, 2019, the City Council authorized execution of a Master License Agreement (“MLA”) (Contract No. C-8584-1) with New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (“AT&T”). The Master License authorized non-exclusive use of City-owned streetlights to install telecommunications equipment for small cell facilities, and included approved designs, fee and rent assessment. AT&T is responsible for all resultant construction, installation, maintenance, and repair of the small cell facilities, including all related costs and expenses. Further, AT&T is responsible for complying with all laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations that may be required for their projects. 2 AT&T Small Cell SLC4735 (PA2019-108) Zoning Administrator, August 13, 2020 Page 3 Tmplt: 07/25/19 x As the local regulatory agency, the City assesses wireless service facilities under local permitting protocol and ensures sites adhere to responsible regulatory practices, including safety, accessibility, environmental impact, land use, and aesthetics. However, Section 332(c)(7)(B)(iv) of U.S. Code Title 47 Telecommunications) reads, “no state or local government may regulate wireless telecommunication facilitates on the basis of the perceived health effects of radio frequency (RF) emissions to the extent that the proposed facilities comply with FCC regulations concerning emissions.” Submitted RF materials from the applicant demonstrate the proposal would conform with FCC Rules and Regulations. Condition of Approval No. 25 requires the applicant to comply with all applicable provisions of U.S. Code Title 47 (Telecommunications) rules and regulations, including those related to radio frequency emissions. PROJECT SETTING AND DESCRIPTION x City of Newport Beach Streetlight No. SLC4735 is in a landscaped median on Avocado Avenue, near Kewamee Drive. All abutting land uses are residential and vary in density from R-1 (Single-Unit Residential) to the west, R-2 (Two-Unit Residential) to the east and to the south, and RM (Multiple Residential) to the north. x Under the new FCC Order, wireless providers are not required to demonstrate a significant coverage gap, a qualification previously required by local jurisdictions in order to support an application. Pursuant to the Order, the City cannot “materially [inhibit] the introduction of new services or the improvement of existing services.” Moreover, pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II) of U.S. Code Title 47 (Telecommunications), the City may “not regulate the placement, construction or modification of wireless service facilities in a manner that prohibits the provision of personal wireless services.” Although not required, the applicant produced a coverage map for the project (Attachment No. ZA 4). This map indicates the proposed facility would boost the supply of capacity and coverage in the vicinity. x Streetlight No. SLC4735 serves as a part of the City’s existing streetlight inventory. AT&T proposes to: (1) remove and replace SLC4735 with a new streetlight in the same location; (2) maintain the existing luminaire heights of 21 feet, 1 inch for the left sensor and 20 feet, 11 inches for the right sensor; (3) install telecommunications equipment for a small cell wireless facility on top of the new streetlight pole resulting in an overall height of 27 feet, 5 inches; and (4) establish new below-grade support equipment adjacent to the streetlight, within the public right-of-way. Please see the Applicant’s Project Description and Justification as Attachment No. ZA 5. x The replacement streetlight pole design is consistent with the size, shape, style, and design of that existing, including the attached light arm and luminaire. Project 3 AT&T Small Cell SLC4735 (PA2019-108) Zoning Administrator, August 13, 2020 Page 4 Tmplt: 07/25/19 plans are available for reference as Attachment No. ZA 7. For safety and circulation of the area during construction, Condition of Approval No. 37 included within the draft resolution requires traffic control plans illustrating compliance with the 2016 WATCHBook (temporary traffic control guidelines in construction work areas) to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any building permit. CONSISTENCY WITH LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING CODE x The project site is designated as Public Right-of-Way (ROW), which is property held in trust by the City, and allows for the construction and maintenance of public roads, crosswalks, pedestrian walkways, electric transmission lines, oil or gas pipeline, water line, sanitary or storm sewer, or other similar uses. City Council Policy L-23 (Siting of Wireless Telecommunications Equipment on City-Owned Property) governs procedures and locations for siting wireless telecommunications equipment in the ROW. Streetlights are eligible for telecom use, subject to entitlements (such as this minor use permit request), yearly rent, and a license agreement. x General Plan Natural Resources Goal NR 21 recommends the “minimized visual impacts of signs and utilities.” The proposed design is consistent with NR 21 by introducing no new vertical obstructions in the ROW, employing stealth elements like colorization (painting to match the streetlight pole), and installing the associated equipment below grade. Conditions of Approval No. 20 and 21 prohibit advertising signage or identifying logos on any telecom facility except for small identification, address, warning, and similar information plates. Signage required by State or Federal regulations shall be allowed in its smallest permissible size. x General Plan Land Use Policy LU 6.1.3 promotes “architecture and planning that complements adjoining uses.” The proposed design adjoins residential uses and aligns with LU 6.1.3 by copying the size, shape, style, and design of the existing streetlight pole to decrease potential disruption of the visual environment. Adverse impact to circulation, aesthetics, sounds, or odor are not anticipated from project implementation. x General Plan Land Use Policy LU 4 calls for the “management of growth and change to protect and enhance the livability of neighborhoods and achieve distinct and economically vital business and employment districts, which are correlated with supporting infrastructure and public services and sustain Newport Beach’s natural setting.” The proposed small cell facility upholds the intent of LU 4 by providing infrastructure to add system capacity for service gaps that may occur for residents and businesses of the area in regular and high demand periods. It also benefits the community by improving the existing coverage and capacity to increase the voice and data system already in use by its customers. The facility is 4 AT&T Small Cell SLC4735 (PA2019-108) Zoning Administrator, August 13, 2020 Page 5 Tmplt: 07/25/19 designed to adapt and accept future technologies, such as 5G, and will help meet local demand and sustain the livability of the area. x From a Zoning Code perspective, Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC) Chapter 20.49 (Wireless Telecommunication Facilities) outlines State- and federally compliant telecommunication facility development standards and details permit procedures based on facility “Class.” Class of a wireless facility is characterized by its installation type and location. Small cell facilities located on City-owned streetlights in the ROW are a Class 3 specification (Public Right-of- Way Installations) and require the applicant to obtain a Minor Use Permit from the Zoning Administrator (NBMC Section 20.49.060 [Permit Review Procedures]). NBMC Subsection 20.49.040(A) (Preferred Locations) prioritizes telecom facilities from most preferred (1) to least preferred (4) as follows: (1) collocation of a new facility at an existing facility; (2) Class 1 (Stealth/Screened); (3) Class 2 (Visible Antennas) and Class 3 (Public Right-of-Way); and (4) Class 4 (Freestanding Structure). Although lower on the listing of priority facilities, the proposed facility consists of one small cell facility that is designed to not visually dominate the surrounding area and instead to blend into the existing block. In accordance with NBMC Section 20.30.100 (Public View Protection) and General Plan Natural Resources Policy NR 20.3 (Public Views), the location is not located within a protected public view corridor and, therefore, would not have any impact to public views. x NBMC Section 20.49.050 (General Development and Design Standards) requires projects to be visually compatible with surrounding structures. In reviewing this application, the Zoning Administrator shall consider the proposed facility’s use of color blending, equipment screening, and the limited size of the equipment designed consistently with the aforementioned criteria. All telecommunications equipment on top of the streetlight pole would be concealed within a painted-to- match 12-inch diameter shroud. The proposed small cell facility would rely on likeness with the streetlight pole through style, color, and material to help disguise its presence. Engineering of the replacement streetlight pole accommodates and withstands the weight of the small cell equipment and could display a future City banner, if needed. Electrical and wiring components of the telecommunications equipment are designed to be fully contained within the new streetlight pole. The overall height of 27 feet, 5 inches from finished grade to the top of the proposed facility complies with the maximum allowed. Equipment not contained within the shroud on the streetlight pole would be out of sight, located below the ground in the adjacent ROW. Condition of Approval No. 32 requires approved design drawings from Southern California Edison (SCE) of the power supply to the small cell facility before construction of the facility is to commence. x The existing development surrounding the median on Avocado Avenue is entirely residential. The zoning designations range from R-1 (Single-Unit Residential) to 5 AT&T Small Cell SLC4735 (PA2019-108) Zoning Administrator, August 13, 2020 Page 6 Tmplt: 07/25/19 the west, R-2 (Two-Unit Residential) to the east and to the south, and RM (Multiple Residential) to the north. Both the R-1-and R-2 zoning districts allow for principal structures up to 29 feet in height for sloped roof elements while RM allows up to 33 feet for sloped roof elements. The height of the replacement streetlight with proposed equipment will not exceed the height limitations of the surrounding structures and is not anticipated to dominate the streetscape. Photographic visual simulations of the facility, depicting the existing and proposed conditions, have been prepared by the applicant and are included as Attachment No. ZA 6. x The streetlight is located within a landscaped median and separated from any surrounding residence by two lanes of travel on Avocado Avenue. There are other City streetlights, street signs, and wayfinding signs common to City streetscapes adorning Avocado Avenue. There is also an existing Hong Kong Orchid tree adjacent to the streetlight. The Hong Kong Orchid has large thick leaves and vibrant purplish red flowers. The tree helps to provide a visual distraction from the proposed equipment. Additionally, there are tall palm and eucalyptus trees in the median that will help screen the equipment. For the reasons listed above, the proposed streetlight and associated equipment is anticipated to blend into the existing streetscape. Figure 1. Existing streetlight. 6 AT&T Small Cell SLC4735 (PA2019-108) Zoning Administrator, August 13, 2020 Page 7 Tmplt: 07/25/19 x The project is located within the Coastal Zone. Subsection 21.49.020(B) (Permit and Agreement Required) of the NBMC requires a coastal development permit for any wireless telecommunication facility unless said facility is exempted by Subsection 21.49.020(C) (Exempt Facilities). In this case, the project does not meet any of the prescribed exemptions; therefore, a coastal development permit is required. The project was reviewed for consistency with the Public View Protection regulations of Section 21.49.050(B) (Public View Protection) of the NBMC. The site is not located between the first public roadway paralleling the sea, is not on a coastal bluff or canyon, is not adjacent to or within the viewshed of a public view point, coastal view road, public park or beach, or public accessway, as identified on the Coastal Land Use Plan Map 4-3 (Coastal Views), and does not contain significant natural landforms or vegetation. x The project scope involves the removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight in the same location with the same luminaire height. The project has been designed to blend with its surroundings and while it will still be visible, the replacement streetlight is consistent with the size, shape, style, and design of the existing pole. The proposed replacement streetlight and antenna structure will comply with the maximum allowable height limit of 35 feet from existing finished grade. The project site is located within an existing street median. No above- ground mounted equipment is proposed and the support equipment is proposed to be placed in an underground vault. All transmission equipment, including remote radio units and the raycap disconnect switch, are fully concealed within a screening shroud. There will be no negative impacts on coastal views or coastal resources Figure 2. Rendering showing the replaced streetlight pole, antenna, equipment shroud, and below-grade equipment vaults. 7 AT&T Small Cell SLC4735 (PA2019-108) Zoning Administrator, August 13, 2020 Page 8 Tmplt: 07/25/19 with the project’s implementation. The project will not affect the public’s ability to gain access to, use, and/or view the coast and nearby recreational facilities. HEALTH AND SAFETY x Section 332(c)(7)(B)(iv) of U.S. Code Title 47 (Telecommunications) reads, “no state or local government may regulate wireless telecommunication facilitates on the basis of the perceived health effects of radio frequency (RF) emissions to the extent that the proposed facilities comply with FCC regulations concerning emissions.” Submitted RF materials from the applicant demonstrate the proposal would conform with FCC Rules and Regulations. Condition of Approval No. 25 requires the applicant to comply with all applicable provisions of U.S. Code Title 47 (Telecommunications) rules and regulations, including those related to FCC Radio Frequency safety. ALTERNATIVE SITES CONSIDERED x Three nearby streetlights were identified and investigated by the applicant as possible alternate locations for this small cell facility; however, all sites were found by the applicant to be not viable (see Attachment No. ZA 3). x Alternative Site #1 at City Streetlight No. SLC4734 is located approximately 150 feet southwest of the proposed streetlight. This location is also in a landscaped median along Avocado Avenue and is situated between two tall eucalyptus trees. The trees are taller than the streetlight and most of the foliage of these trees grows near the top of the tree, above the height of the streetlight, while the trunk is somewhat barren. Furthermore, the trees are located over 25 feet away from the streetlight and are not immediately adjacent. The trees in this location provide less screening than the proposed location and the small cell facility is anticipated to be more visually intrusive in this location. x Alternative Site #2 at City Streetlight No. SLC4736 is located approximately 240 feet northeast of the proposed streetlight, at the intersection of Fourth Avenue and Avocado Avenue. This location is also in a landscaped median on Avocado Avenue and abuts a pedestrian ramp. While the pedestrian ramp does not prevent the installation of the necessary below grade equipment, the lack of surrounding trees to provide visual distraction, screening, or masking renders the proposed equipment more likely to be visually intrusive at this location. x Alternative Site #3 at City Streetlight No. SLC4720 is located approximately 310 feet northwest of the proposed streetlight. This streetlight is located within the sidewalk of Kewamee Drive and immediately adjacent to a condominium building. The sidewalk in this location is narrow. There is less than 3 feet in width from the back of the existing streetlight to the edge of sidewalk and a replacement streetlight 8 AT&T Small Cell SLC4735 (PA2019-108) Zoning Administrator, August 13, 2020 Page 9 Tmplt: 07/25/19 would not be able to be installed in accordance with American with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The proposed project is infeasible at this location. x There is an existing condominium complex at the intersection of Avocado Avenue and Kewamee Drive. The property is zoned RM (Multiple Residential) and while the RM zoning district does permit the installation of wireless telecommunication facilities where the maximum allowable number of dwelling units is more than four, a small cell facility at this location would not be technically feasible from an RF perspective. Small cell facilities are low powered and must be located at the precise location selected to serve the network traffic demands of the specific limited area. Small cell facilities use an omnidirectional antenna that propagates in 360 degrees and function most efficiently on an unobstructed, vertical, structure such as a streetlight or utility pole. Most of the signal would be blocked by the structures of the condominium complex. x AT&T’s analysis concluded that a more preferred location as defined by NBMC Subsection 21.49.040(A) (Preferred Locations), such as a collocation or a Class 1 or 2 facility, would not be technically feasible from an RF or construction perspective. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15302 and 15303 under Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction) and Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), respectively, of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. In this case, the proposal includes the removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight pole to install a small telecommunications wireless facility, including below- grade accessory equipment. The exceptions to the Class 3 categorical exemptions under Section 15300.2 are not applicable. The project location does not impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern, does not result in cumulative impacts, does not have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances, does not damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway, is not a hazardous waste site, and is not identified as a historical resource. 9 AT&T Small Cell SLC4735 (PA2019-108) Zoning Administrator, August 13, 2020 Page 10 Tmplt: 07/25/19 PUBLIC NOTICE Notice of this application was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to all owners of property and residential occupants within 300 feet of the boundaries of the site (excluding intervening rights-of-way and waterways) including the applicant, and posted on the subject streetlight pole at least 10 days before the scheduled hearing, consistent with the provisions of the Municipal Code. Although not required, a courtesy notice was mailed to residential occupants living within the aforementioned radius. Additionally, the item appeared on the agenda for this meeting, which was posted at City Hall and on the City website. APPEAL PERIOD: An appeal or call for review may be filed with the Director of Community Development within 14 days following the date of action. For additional information on filing an appeal, contact the Planning Division at 949-644-3200. Prepared by: BMZ/jp Attachments: ZA 1 Draft Resolution ZA 2 Vicinity Map ZA 3 Alternative Locations Studied and Rejected ZA 4 Coverage Maps ZA 5 Applicant’s Project Description and Justification ZA 6 Photographic Visual Simulations ZA 7 Project Plans 10 Attachment No. ZA 1 Draft Resolution 11 RESOLUTION NO. ZA2020-### A RESOLUTION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR USE PERMIT NO. UP2019-027 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. CD2020-101 FOR A SMALL CELL WIRELESS FACILITY LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ON CITY STREETLIGHT NUMBER SLC4735, ON THE CENTER MEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE AT THE INTERSECTION OF KEWAMEE DRIVE (PA2019-108) THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS. 1. An application was filed by New Cingular Wireless, LLC (“Applicant”), with respect to City of Newport Beach Streetlight Number SLC4735, located within the public right-of- way, in the center median of Avocado Avenue near Kewamee Drive, requesting approval of a minor use permit and a coastal development permit. 2. The Applicant proposes the installation of a small cell wireless facility on a City-owned streetlight pole. Project implementation will be fully contained within the public right-of- way on Bayside Drive and includes the following: 1) Removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight; (2) Installation of a small cell wireless facility that consists of four (4) remote radio units, a raycap disconnect, and an omni-directional antenna within a 12-inch diameter equipment shroud. This equipment would be fixed to the top of the replaced streetlight pole for a maximum height of 27 feet, 5 inches; and (3) Establishment of new below-grade support equipment adjacent to the streetlight. 3. The streetlight pole is located within the public right-of-way. The proposal is regulated by City Council Policy L-23 (Siting of Wireless Telecommunications Equipment on City- Owned Property), as well as Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC) Chapter 20.49 (Wireless Telecommunication Facilities). 4. The Project is located within the Coastal Zone. Subsection 21.49.020(B) (Permit and Agreement Required) of the NBMC requires a coastal development permit for a wireless telecommunication facility unless said facility is exempted by Subsection 21.49.020(C) (Exempt Facilities). In this case, the Project does not meet any of the prescribed exemptions; therefore, a coastal development permit is required. 5. A public hearing was held on August 13, 2020, in the Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach. A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Zoning Administrator at this hearing. 12 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-### Page 2 of 16 01-25-19 SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION. 1. This project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15302 and 15303 under Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction) and Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), respectively, of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one (1) use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. 2. In this case, the proposal includes the removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight pole to install a small cell wireless facility, including below-grade accessory equipment. 3. The exceptions to the Class 3 categorical exemption under Section 15300.2 are not applicable. The project location does not impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern, does not result in cumulative impacts, does not have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances, does not damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway, is not a hazardous waste site, and is not identified as a historical resource. SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS. Minor Use Permit In accordance with NBMC Subsection 20.52.020(F) (Conditional Use Permits and Minor Use Permits), the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth: Finding: A. The use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The project site is designated as Public Right-of-Way (ROW), which is property held in trust by the City, and allows for the construction and maintenance of public roads, crosswalks, pedestrian walkways, electric transmission lines, oil or gas pipeline, water line, sanitary or storm sewer, or other similar uses. City Council Policy L-23 (Siting of Wireless Telecommunications Equipment on City-Owned Property) governs procedures and locations for siting wireless telecommunications equipment in the ROW. Streetlights 13 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-### Page 3 of 16 01-25-19 are eligible for telecom use, subject to entitlements (such as this minor use permit request), yearly rent, and a license agreement. 2. General Plan Natural Resources Goal NR 21 recommends the “minimized visual impacts of signs and utilities.” The proposed design is consistent with NR 21 by introducing no new vertical obstructions in the ROW, employing stealth elements like colorization (painting to match the streetlight pole), and installing the associated equipment below grade. Conditions of Approval No. 20 and 21 prohibit advertising signage or identifying logos on any telecom facility except for small identification, address, warning, and similar information plates. Signage required by State or Federal regulations shall be allowed in its smallest permissible size. 3. General Plan Land Use Policy LU 6.1.3 promotes “architecture and planning that complements adjoining uses.” The proposed design adjoins residential uses and aligns with LU 6.1.3 by copying the size, shape, style, and design of the existing streetlight pole to decrease potential disruption of the visual environment. Adverse impact to circulation, aesthetics, sounds, or odor are not anticipated from project implementation. 4. General Plan Land Use Policy LU 4 calls for the “management of growth and change to protect and enhance the livability of neighborhoods and achieve distinct and economically vital business and employment districts, which are correlated with supporting infrastructure and public services and sustain Newport Beach’s natural setting.” The proposed small cell facility upholds the intent of LU 4 by providing infrastructure to add system capacity for service gaps that may occur for residents and businesses of the area in regular and high demand periods. It also benefits the community by improving the existing coverage and capacity to increase the voice and data system already in use by its customers. The facility is designed to adapt and accept future technologies, such as 5G, and will help meet local demand and sustain the livability of the area. 5. The project site is not located within a specific plan area Finding: B. The use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code and the Municipal Code. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. See Fact in Support of Finding A.1. 2. Wireless telecommunication facilities are regulated by NBMC Chapter 20.49 (Wireless Telecommunication Facilities). small cell equipment in the ROW assigns the project a Class 3 specification (Public Right-of-Way Installations) and requires the Applicant to obtain a minor use permit from the Zoning Administrator (NBMC Section 20.49.060 [Permit Review Procedures]). 14 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-### Page 4 of 16 01-25-19 3. NBMC Subsection 20.49.040(A) (Preferred Locations) prioritizes telecom facilities from most preferred (1) to least preferred (4) as follows: (1) collocation of a new facility at an existing facility; (2) Class 1 (Stealth/Screened); (3) Class 2 (Visible Antennas) and Class 3 (Public Right-of-Way); and (4) Class 4 (Freestanding Structure). Although lower on the listing of priority facilities, the proposed facility consists of one (1) small cell facility that is designed to not visually dominate the surrounding area and instead to blend into the existing block. 4. NBMC Section 20.49.050 (General Development and Design Standards) requires projects to be visually compatible with surrounding structures. In reviewing this application, the Zoning Administrator shall consider the proposed facility’s use of color blending, equipment screening, and the limited size of the equipment designed consistently with the aforementioned criteria. All telecommunications equipment on top of the streetlight pole would be concealed within a painted-to-match 12-inch diameter shroud. The proposed small cell facility would rely on likeness with the streetlight pole through style, color, and material to help disguise its presence. Engineering of the replacement streetlight pole accommodates and withstands the weight of the small cell equipment and has ability to display a future City banner, if needed. Electrical and wiring components of the telecommunications equipment are designed to be fully contained within the new streetlight pole. The overall height of 27 feet, 5 inches from finished grade to the top of the proposed facility complies with the maximum allowed. Equipment not contained within the shroud on the streetlight pole would be out of sight, located below the ground in the adjacent ROW. Condition of Approval No. 32 requires approved design drawings from Southern California Edison (SCE) for the power supply to the small cell facility before construction of the facility is to commence. 5. The existing development which surrounds the median on Avocado Avenue is entirely residential. The zoning designations range from R-1 (Single-Unit Residential) to the west, R-2 (Two-Unit Residential) to the east and to the south, and RM (Multiple Residential) to the north. Both the R-1-and R-2 zoning districts allow for principal structures up to 29 feet in height for sloped roof elements, while RM allows up to 33 feet for sloped roof elements. The height of the replacement streetlight with proposed equipment will not exceed the height limitations of the surrounding structures and will not stick out. 6. An existing Hong Kong Orchid tree is located within the center median, immediately adjacent to the streetlight. The Hong Kong Orchid has large thick leaves and vibrant purplish red flowers. The tree helps to provide a visual distraction from the proposed equipment. Additionally, there are tall palm and eucalyptus trees in the median that will help screen the equipment. 7. Submitted materials from the Applicant demonstrate the proposal would conform with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Rules and Regulations regarding safety and radio frequency (RF) emissions. 15 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-### Page 5 of 16 01-25-19 8. The proposed telecom facility will comply with applicable requirements of the NBMC with construction as shown on the plans and implementation of the conditions of approval. Finding: C. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the use are compatible with the allowed uses in the vicinity. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. City of Newport Beach Streetlight No. SLC4735 serves as a part of the City’s existing streetlight inventory. The Applicant proposes to remove and replace SLC4735 with a new streetlight in the same location while maintaining the existing luminaire heights of 21 feet, 1 inch for the left luminaire sensor and 20 feet, 11 inches for the right luminaire sensor. The telecommunications equipment will be installed on top of the new streetlight pole resulting in an overall height of 27 feet, 5 inches. All supporting equipment will be installed below-grade adjacent to the streetlight, within the public right-of-way. 2. The replacement streetlight pole design is consistent with the size, shape, style, and design of that existing, including the attached light arms and luminaire sensors. For safety and circulation of the area during construction, Condition of Approval No. 37 requires traffic control plans illustrating compliance with the 2016 WATCHBook to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any building permit. 3. The proposed telecom facility is anticipated to enhance coverage and capacity for residents, visitors and businesses in the neighborhood by providing wireless access to voice and data transmission services. The proposed telecom facility is not expected to result in any material changes to the character of the local community. 4. Under FCC Orders, wireless providers are not required to demonstrate a significant coverage gap, a qualification previously required by local jurisdictions in order to support an application. Pursuant to the Order, the City cannot “materially [inhibit] the introduction of new services or the improvement of existing services.” Moreover, pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II) of U.S. Code Title 47 (Telecommunications), the City may “not regulate the placement, construction or modification of wireless service facilities in a manner that prohibits the provision of personal wireless services.” Although not required, the Applicant produced a coverage map for the project. This map indicates the proposed facility would boost the supply of capacity and coverage in the vicinity. 5. See Facts in Support of Finding B.4, B.5, and B.6. 6. The proposed facility will be unmanned, will have no impact on the circulation system, and, as conditioned, will not generate noise, odor, smoke, or any other adverse impacts to adjacent land uses. 16 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-### Page 6 of 16 01-25-19 Finding: D. The site is physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access and public services and utilities. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. Adequate public and emergency vehicle access, public services, and utilities are provided to and around the subject site, and the proposed use will not change this. 2. The proposed facility will be unmanned and will have no permanent impact on the circulation system and adjacent land uses due to its location in the parkway, outside of existing vehicle or pedestrian circulation areas. 3. The Public Works Department and Utilities Department have reviewed the project proposal and do not have any concerns regarding access, public services, or utilities provided to the existing neighborhood and surrounding area. Finding: E. Operation of the use at the location proposed would not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, nor endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The proposed facility will only require periodic maintenance and will not generate any type of significant adverse impacts to the environment, such as noise, odor, smoke, etc. 2. The proposed facility must and will comply with the applicable Federal and State rules, regulations and standards thus, ensuring public health and safety. 3. See Facts in Support of Finding B.4, B.5, B.6, B.7, and B.8. 4. The proposed telecom facility will be effectively blended based upon the design and location with the incorporation of the conditions of approval to the greatest extent feasible. As a result, the proposed facility at this location is not expected to result in conditions that are materially detrimental to nearby property owners, residents, and businesses, nor to public health or safety. Wireless Telecommunications Facility In accordance with NBMC Subsection 20.49.060(H)(1) (General Findings for Telecom Facilities), the following additional findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth: 17 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-### Page 7 of 16 01-25-19 Finding: F. The proposed telecom facility is visually compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. See Facts in Support of Finding B.4, B.5, and B.6. 2. The streetlight is located within a landscaped median and separated from any surrounding residence by two (2) lanes of travel on Avocado Avenue. There are other City streetlights, street signs, and wayfinding signs common to City streetscapes adorning Avocado Avenue. The proposed streetlight and associated equipment will blend into the existing streetscape. 3. There are no public parks near the proposed project. 4. The proposed facility and below-grade accessory equipment meets the City’s design parameters approved by the City’s Master License Agreement, which emphasizes stealth techniques and best practices to not be materially detrimental to the surrounding area. Finding: G. The proposed telecom facility complies with height, location and design standards, as provided for in this chapter. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The 27-foot, 5-inch tall small cell facility would comply with the maximum height limit of 35 feet for telecom facilities installed on streetlights within the public right-of-way. 2. See Facts in Support of Finding B in its entirety. 3. The application includes documentation indicating the need to provide and improve coverage to the residential areas within the City of Newport Beach. Moreover, the additional system capacity provided by the proposed facility will address service gaps that occur during high demand periods, as well as service gaps that exist at all demand periods to the surrounding area. The proposed small cell site will help AT&T to meet its coverage objectives and improve coverage to nearby areas that are currently marginal. Finding: H. An alternative site(s) located further from a residential district, public park or public facility cannot feasibly fulfill the coverage needs fulfilled by the installation at the proposed site. 18 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-### Page 8 of 16 01-25-19 Facts in Support of Finding: 1. Three (3) alternative streetlights neighboring the project were identified and investigated by the Applicant, but these sites were found not practicable. 2. Alternative Site #1 at City Streetlight No. SLC4734 is located approximately 150 feet southwest of the proposed streetlight. This location is also in a landscaped median along Avocado Avenue and is situated between two (2) tall eucalyptus trees. The trees are taller than the streetlight and most of the foliage of these trees grows near the top of the tree, above the height of the streetlight, while the trunk is somewhat barren. Furthermore, the trees are located over 25 feet away from the streetlight and are not immediately adjacent. The trees in this location provide less screening than the proposed location and the small cell facility is anticipated to be more visually intrusive in this location. 3. Alternative Site #2 at City Streetlight No. SLC4736 is located approximately 240 feet northeast of the proposed streetlight, at the intersection of Fourth Avenue and Avocado Avenue. This location is also in a landscaped median on Avocado Avenue and abuts a pedestrian ramp. While the pedestrian ramp does not prevent the installation of the necessary below grade equipment, the lack of surrounding trees to provide visual distraction, screening, or masking renders the proposed equipment more likely to be visually intrusive at this location. 4. Alternative Site #3 at City Streetlight No. SLC4720 is located approximately 310 feet northwest of the proposed streetlight. This streetlight is located within the sidewalk of Kewamee Drive and immediately adjacent to a condominium building. The sidewalk in this location is narrow. There is less than 3 feet in width from the back of the existing streetlight to the edge of sidewalk and a replacement streetlight would not be able to be installed in accordance with American with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The proposed project is infeasible at this location. 5. There is an existing condominium complex at the intersection of Avocado Avenue and Kewamee Drive. The property is zoned RM (Multiple Residential) and while the RM zoning district does permit the installation of wireless telecommunication facilities where the maximum allowable number of dwelling units is more than four (4), a small cell facility at this location would not be technically feasible from an RF perspective. Small cell facilities are low powered and must be located at the precise location selected to serve the network traffic demands of the specific limited area. Small cell facilities use an omnidirectional antenna that propagates in 360 degrees and function most efficiently on an unobstructed, vertical, structure such as a streetlight or utility pole. Most of the signal would be blocked by the structures of the condominium complex. Finding: I. An alternative plan that would result in a higher preference facility class category for the proposed facility is not available or reasonably feasible and desirable under the circumstances. 19 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-### Page 9 of 16 01-25-19 Facts in Support of Finding: 1. Fact in Support of finding H.5 is incorporated by reference. 2. The Applicant’s analysis concluded that a more preferred location as defined by NBMC Subsection 20.49.040(A) (Preferred Locations), such as a collocation or a Class 1 or 2 facility, would not be technically feasible from an RF or construction perspective. The analysis explained that small cell facilities are low powered and must be located at the precise location selected to serve the network traffic demands of the specific limited area. Further, this type of service cannot be accomplished with a traditional macro collocation or building mounted site in the area. Coastal Development Permit In accordance with Subsection 21.52.015(F) (Coastal Development Permits, Findings and Decision) of the NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth: Finding: J. Conforms to all applicable sections of the certified Local Coastal Program. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The project is considered a Class 3 (Public Right-of-Way) installation. Section 21.49.040 (Telecom Facility Preferences and Prohibited Locations) of the NBMC lists Class 3 installations as third on the installation preference list. It is not proposed at a location that is prohibited by NBMC Subsection 21.49.040(B) (Prohibited Locations). 2. See Fact in Support of Finding I.2. 3. The project complies with Section 21.30.100 (Scenic and Visual Quality Protection) of the NBMC. The subject location is not located between the first public roadway paralleling the sea and the sea, is not on a coastal bluff or canyon, not adjacent to or within the viewshed of a public viewpoint, coastal view road, public park or beach, or public accessway, as identified on the Coastal Land Use Plan Map 4-3 (Coastal Views), and does not contain significant natural landforms or vegetation. The project scope involves the removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight in the same location with the same luminaire heights. The project has been designed to blend with its surroundings while it will be visible. The replacement streetlight is consistent with the size, shape, style, and design of the existing pole. No above-ground mounted equipment is proposed, and the support equipment is proposed to be placed in underground handholes. All transmission equipment, including remote radio units and the raycap disconnect switch, are fully concealed within a screening shroud. There will be no negative impacts on coastal views or coastal resources with the project’s implementation. 20 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-### Page 10 of 16 01-25-19 4. The proposed replacement streetlight and antenna structure will comply with the maximum allowable height limit of 35 feet from existing finished grade. Finding: K. Conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act if the project is located between the nearest public road and the sea or shoreline of any body of water located within the coastal zone. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. Streetlight No. SLC4735 is not located between the nearest public road and the sea or shoreline. The project site is within an existing street median on Avocado Avenue. All equipment will be either concealed within the replacement pole or vaulted below grade. There will be no changes or obstructions to the pedestrian right-of-way and access on Avocado Avenue will be unaffected. As such, the project will not affect the public’s ability to gain access to, use, and/or view the coast and nearby recreational facilities. 2. The project will allow the installation of a small cell facility that complies with all applicable Local Coastal Program (LCP) development standards and maintains development attributes consistent with the existing and anticipated future surrounding neighborhood pattern of development. Therefore, the project does not have the potential to degrade public views within the Coastal Zone. SECTION 4. DECISION. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. This project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15302 and 15303 under Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction) and Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), respectively, of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. The exceptions to the Class 3 exemption do not apply. 2. The Zoning Administrator of the City of Newport Beach hereby approves Minor Use Permit No. UP2019-027 and Coastal Development Permit No. CD2020-101, subject to the conditions set forth in “Exhibit A,” which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 1. This action shall become final and effective 14 days following the date this Resolution was adopted unless within such time an appeal or call for review is filed with the Community Development Director in accordance with the provisions of Title 21 Local Coastal Implementation Plan, of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. The project site is not located within the appeal area of the coastal zone; therefore, final action by the City may not be appealed to the California Coastal Commission. 21 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-### Page 11 of 16 01-25-19 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2020. _____________________________________ Jaime Murillo, Zoning Administrator 22 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-### Page 12 of 16 01-25-19 EXHIBIT “A” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Division 1. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the plans, including elevation exhibits and visual simulations, stamped and dated with the date of this approval (except as modified by applicable conditions of approval). 2. The project is subject to all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards, unless specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval. 3. The Applicant shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws. Material violation of any of those laws in connection with the use may be cause for revocation of this approval. 4. The telecom facility approved by this permit shall comply with all applicable Federal and State rules, regulations, and standards. 5. The replacement pole shall be reconstructed in the exact location of the existing streetlight pole. 6. The reconstructed streetlight pole design shall be consistent with the size (including diameter), shape, style, and design of the existing streetlight pole to the greatest extent feasible, including the attached light arm and luminaire. All mounted equipment shall be painted to match the color and style of the replacement streetlight pole. 7. All accessory support equipment of this facility shall be installed underground. 8. All electrical and antenna wiring shall be fully encased within the reconstructed streetlight pole. 9. The telecom facility approved by the use permit shall comply with any easements, covenants, conditions, or restrictions on the underlying City-trust property upon which the facility is located. 10. Anything not specifically approved by this permit is not permitted and must be addressed in a separate and subsequent review. 11. Prior to building permit final, a Height Certification Inspection shall be required prior to final of building permits. The small cell facility and base streetlight pole approved by this permit shall not exceed a total of 27 feet, 5 inches (27’ 5”) in height from existing grade (maximum elevation height of 117.2 feet above grade using the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 [NAVD88]). 23 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-### Page 13 of 16 01-25-19 12. Prior to building permit issuance, all contractors and subcontractors shall have a valid City of Newport Beach business license. 13. The Applicant shall continually maintain the wireless telecom facility so that it retains its original appearance at the time the building permit is finaled by the City of Newport Beach. 14. On an annual basis, the Applicant shall conduct maintenance inspections of the wireless telecom facility, including the small cell facility and below-grade equipment areas, and make all necessary repairs. The Community Development Director may require additional inspections and/or maintenance activities at his/her discretion. 15. The Applicant shall not prevent the City of Newport Beach from having adequate spectrum capacity on the City's 800 MHz radio frequencies at any time. 16. The facility shall transmit at the approved frequency ranges established by the FCC. The Applicant shall inform the City in writing of any proposed changes to the frequency range in order to prevent interference with the City's Public Safety radio equipment. 17. The telecommunications facility shall at no time interfere with the frequencies used by the City of Newport Beach for public safety. “Comprehensive advanced planning and frequency coordination” engineering measures shall prevent interference, especially in the choice of frequencies and radio ancillary hardware. This is encouraged in the "Best Practices Guide" published by the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials-International, Inc. ("APCO"), and as endorsed by the FCC. 18. Should interference with the City's Public Safety radio equipment occur, use of the telecom facility authorized by this permit may be suspended until the radio frequency interference is corrected and verification of the compliance is reported. 19. The Applicant shall provide a "single point of contact" for the carrier in its Engineering and Maintenance Departments that is monitored 24 hours per day to ensure continuity on all interference issues, and to which interference problems may be reported. The name, telephone number, fax number, and email address of that person shall be provided to the Community Development Department and Newport Beach Police Department's Support Services Commander prior to activation of the facility. If the point of contact changes, the City shall be immediately alerted and updated. 20. No advertising signage or identifying logos shall be displayed on the telecom facility except for small identification, address, warning, and similar information plates. A detail of the information plates depicting the language on the plate shall be included in the plans submitted for issuance of building permits. 21. Appropriate information warning signs or plates shall be posted on the base streetlight pole of the transmitting antenna. In addition, contact information (e.g., a telephone number) shall be provided on the warning signs or plates. The location of the information warning signs or plates shall be depicted on the plans submitted for construction permits. 24 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-### Page 14 of 16 01-25-19 Signage required by State or federal regulations shall be allowed in its smallest permissible size. 22. Prior to the final of building permits, the Applicant shall schedule an evening inspection by the Code Enforcement Division to confirm compliance with lighting. The telecom facility shall be lighted to the extent deemed necessary by the Newport Beach Police and Utilities Departments for security lighting and consistency with other streetlights in the area. 23. The Applicant shall maintain the telecom facility in a manner consistent with this approval. 24. The Applicant shall ensure that its telecom facility complies with the most current regulatory, operations standards, and radio frequency emissions standards adopted by the FCC. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining the most current information from the FCC regarding allowable radio frequency emissions and all other applicable regulations and standards. This information shall be made available by the Applicant upon request of the Community Development Director. 25. The facility shall comply with all applicable provisions of U.S. Code Title 47 (Telecommunications) rules and regulations, including those related to FCC Radio Frequency safety. 26. Prior to final of building permits, the Applicant shall schedule an inspection by the Planning Division to ensure materials and colors match existing architecture as illustrated in the approved photographic simulations and in conformance with NBMC Section 20.49.050. 27. Any operator who intends to abandon or discontinue use of a telecom facility must notify the Planning Division by certified mail no less than thirty (30) days prior to such action. The operator shall have ninety (90) days from the date of abandonment or discontinuance to reactivate use of the facility, or remove the telecom facility and restore the site. 28. The City reserves the right and jurisdiction to review and modify any permit approved pursuant to NBMC Chapters 20.49 and 21.49, including the conditions of approval, based on changed circumstances. The operator shall notify the Planning Division of any proposal to change the height or size of the facility; increase the size, shape, or number of antennas; change the facility's color or materials or location on the site; or increase the signal output above the maximum permissible exposure ("MPE") limits imposed by the radio frequency emissions guidelines of the FCC. Any changed circumstance shall require the operator to apply for a review of the modification, and possible amendment to the use permit, prior to implementing any change. 29. Minor Use Permit No. UP2019-027 and Costal Development Permit No. CD2020-101 shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in 25 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-### Page 15 of 16 01-25-19 Sections 20.54.060 and 21.54.060 (Time Limits and Extensions) of the NBMC unless an extension is otherwise granted. 30. Construction activities shall comply with NBMC Section 10.28.040, which restricts hours of noise-generating construction activities that produce noise to between the hours of 7 a.m. and 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. Noise-generating construction activities are not allowed on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays. 31. This approval may be modified or revoked by the Zoning Administrator if determined that the proposed uses or conditions under which it is being operated or maintained is detrimental to the public health, welfare or materially injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or if the property is operated or maintained so as to constitute a public nuisance. 32. A copy of the Resolution, including conditions of approval Exhibit “A,” and approved drawings from Southern California Edison (SCE) for the power supply and design, shall be incorporated into the Building Division and field sets of plans prior to issuance of the building permits. 33. The Applicant is responsible for compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). In compliance with the MBTA, grading, brush removal, building demolition, tree trimming, and similar construction activities shall occur between August 16 and January 31, outside of the peak nesting period. If such activities must occur inside the peak nesting season from February 1 to August 15, compliance with the following is required to prevent the taking of Native Birds pursuant to MBTA: A. The construction area shall be inspected for active nests. If birds are observed flying from a nest or sitting on a nest, it can be assumed that the nest is active. Construction activity within 300 feet of an active nest shall be delayed until the nest is no longer active. Continue to observe the nest until the chicks have left the nest and activity is no longer observed. When the nest is no longer active, construction activity can continue in the nest area. B. It is a violation of state and federal law to kill or harm a native bird. To ensure compliance, consider hiring a biologist to assist with the survey for nesting birds, and to determine when it is safe to commence construction activities. If an active nest is found, one or two short follow-up surveys will be necessary to check on the nest and determine when the nest is no longer active. 34. The Applicant shall promptly notify the City if the landscaped parkway of the subject streetlight pole is negatively affected or otherwise damaged by project implementation. 35. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including without limitation, attorney’s fees, disbursements and 26 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-### Page 16 of 16 01-25-19 court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City’s approval of AT&T Small Cell SLC4735, including, but not limited to, Minor Use Permit No. UP2019-027 and Coastal Development Permit No. CD2020-101 (PA2019-108). This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit or proceeding whether incurred by Applicant, City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The Applicant shall indemnify the City for all of City's costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth in this condition. The Applicant shall pay to the City upon demand any amount owed to the City pursuant to the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition. Public Works Department 36. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, an encroachment permit shall be required. 37. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, traffic control plans illustrating compliance with the 2016 WATCHBook requirements shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department before their implementation. Large construction vehicles shall not be permitted to travel narrow streets as determined by the Public Works Department. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagman. 27 Attachment No. ZA 2 Vicinity Map 28 VICINITY MAP Minor Use Permit No. UP2019-027 Coastal Development Permit No. CD2020-101 PA2019-108 Public right-of-way, City streetlight number SLC4735, center median of Avocado Avenue at the intersection of Kewamee Drive and Avocado Subject Streetlight 29 Tmplt: 07/25/19 Attachment No. ZA 3 Alternative Locations Studied and Rejected 30 © 2018 AT&T Intellectual Property. AT&T, Globe logo, and DIRECTV are registered trademarks and service marks of AT&T Intellectual Property and/or AT&T affiliated companies. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.AT&T Small CellSite ID: CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042Alternative Sites AnalysisMay 19, 2020City streetlight No. SLC4735 located in the center median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 50 feet south of the northeast corner of Kewamee Drive and Avocado Avenue, Newport Beach31 2Map of Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042 and Alternative SitesOn this aerial map, AT&T’s proposed Small Cell Polygon Node# HBNPB_042 is designated by a red marker and the alternative sites are identified by yellow markers.32 3Proposed Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042•AT&T is committed to providing and improving wireless telecommunications services and faster data ratesthroughout the City of Newport Beach.•Rather than construct traditional macro facilities, AT&T’s solution is to deploy very small facilities, called “smallcells,” that can be installed on utility infrastructure in the public right-of-way.•A small cell is a low-powered cell site, which, when grouped with other small cells, can provide coverage inareas where traditional macro wireless facilities are discouraged.•Small cells are effective tools to provide and improve critical wireless services with a minimal impact. By placing small cells in areas where AT&T’s existing facilities are constrained and where AT&T experiences high network traffic, AT&T can address existing and forecasted demands.•Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042 will improve signal quality and capacity within AT&T’swireless network.33 4• AT&T proposes to place Small Cell on a replacement city owned streetlight in the public right of way. (Lat/Long 33.604253, -117.877276). The proposed node is in the center median of Avocado Avenue at Kewamee Drive. The surrounding uses comprise of single and multi-family residential. Several tall palm and Eucalyptus trees are located through this community. • The proposed node would be in the median of Avocado Avenue, adjacent to an existing tree of similar height. The foliage of this tree and those in the background will provide a backdrop and a visual relief of the project as seen from several vantage points. • AT&T proposed node is a stealth facility under City Code §20.49.030(N) and is designed to be as visually inconspicuous as possible. The installation will be a small addition to the existing streetlight and will painted to match. • AT&T determined that this location is viable in thatnecessary utilities are available, and this location isfeasiblefrom a radio frequency perspective. The location is free of obstructions and has good line of site to meet coverage objectives.AT&T will need to install areplacementpole toaccommodate Small Cell.Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042 - Proposed LocationCity streetlight No. SLC4735 located in the center median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 50 feet south of the northeast corner of Kewamee Drive and Avocado Avenue.• Photo Simulation of Proposed Small Cell34 5• Alternative Site #1 is a city streetlight in the public right- of-way. The site is in a landscaped median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 150 feet southwest of the subject node. • The streetlight is located between large mature Eucalyptus trees that are approximately 30 feet away from the existing streetlight. The foliage of these trees are taller than the streetlight. Screening of the proposed installation would be more difficult at this location due to the larger separation between the streetlight and the lack of foliage of these trees. • Small cell at this alternative location would be more visually intrusive and was not selected for this project. Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042 – Alternative Site #1City streetlight No. SLC4734 located in the center median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 155 feet south of the northeast corner of Kewamee Drive and Avocado Avenue.35 6• Alternative Site #2 is a city streetlight in thepublic right- of-way. This site is in the landscaped median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 240 feet northeast of the subject node. • The streetlight is within a landscaped portion adjacent to a pedestrian ramp. • Unlike the proposed node location the streetlight, this alternative location does not have nearby trees to visually screen the proposed small cell installation. • Small cell at this alternative location would be more visually intrusive and was not selected for this project. Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042 – Alternative Site #2City streetlight No. SLC4736 located in the center median of Avocado Avenue at the corner of 4thAvenue. 36 7• Alternative Site #3 is a city streetlight in thepublic right- of-way. This alternative site is approximately 310 feet northwest of the subject node. • The streetlight is within the sidewalk portion of the street right-of-way. A two-story condominium building is adjacent to this alternative site. • The space between the streetlight and back of sidewalk is narrow and would limit the replacement of this streetlight to meet ADA requirements.• A small cell at this alternative location is infeasible.Polygon Node# CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042 – Alternative Site #3City streetlight No. SLC4720, located on the north side of Kewamee Drive, approximately center median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 310 feet northwest of the Avocado Avenue.37 8Proposed Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042Conclusion•The proposed small cell node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042 is an integral part of an overall small cell solutionto helpclose AT&T’s significant service coverage gap in this portion of Newport Beach.•The proposed small cell will provide wireless telecommunications service and faster data rates to the area businesses, residents & visitors.•The proposed small cell is the best available and least intrusive means to help AT&T provide and improve critical wireless services in the surrounding areas, adding low-power, low-profile equipment to utility infrastructure in the public right-of-way.•The use of a replacement streetlight allows a stealth design for the proposed equipment and antenna.•The proposed installation will enhance wireless communication with the least visual impact to the community. 38 39 Attachment No. ZA 4 Coverage Maps 40 © 2016 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property.AT&T Proprietary (Internal Use Only) Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies except under written agreement.AT&T Coverage Maps* Small Cell node CRAN_RLOS_CSTAM_HBNPB_042*In its recent small cell deployment order, the FCC rejected the need for wirelessproviders to demonstrate a significant gap to support a wireless siting application.The FCC explained that a local government could effectively prohibit wireless service“not only by rendering a service provider unable to provide existing service in a newgeographic area or by restricting the entry of a new provider in providing service in aparticular area, but also by materially inhibiting the introduction of new services orthe improvement of existing services. Thus, an effective prohibition includesmaterially inhibiting additional services or improving existing services.” So, such mapscannot be required. Nonetheless, to comply with the city’s application requirements,AT&T is submitting signal strength coverage maps that depict its wireless servicecoverage for LTE service at 1900 MHz as it exists now and as predicted after the smallcell is installed and on air. Note, however, that the city’s requirement for these mapsis inappropriate under applicable law and not relevant in any event because AT&T’sproposed facility provides capacity relief within the existing wireless network.41 LTE 1900_Coverage without Small cell© 2016 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. AT&T Proprietary (Internal Use Only) Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies except under written agreement.Macro siteProposed small cell Nodes42 LTE 1900_Coverage with Small cell© 2016 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. AT&T Proprietary (Internal Use Only) Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies except under written agreement.Macro siteProposed small cell Nodes43 Attachment No. ZA 5 Applicant’s Project Description and Justification 44 Exhibit B New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility AT&T Site ID: HBNPB_042 and FA#14807371 Project Address: City streetlight No. SLC4735 located in the center median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 50 feet south of the northeast corner of Kewamee Drive and Avocado Avenue, Newport Beach Project Narrative New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility (“AT&T”) is proposing to install a new small cell wireless telecommunications facility to serve residents and businesses in this portion of the community. Small cells are low-power, low-profile wireless communications facilities that improve signal quality and capacity within AT&T’s existing wireless network. The proposed small cell facility will help AT&T provide and improve critical wireless services in this area. AT&T estimates that since the introduction of the iPhone in 2007, mobile data usage has increased 470,000% on its network. AT&T customers’ growing demand for mobile data services will continue to increase. Customer needs require AT&T to design and maintain its network to provide and improve wireless signal quality and to increase data rates sufficient to stream video. Areas that do not meet this minimal standard, or where wireless service is otherwise compromised, represent service issues that must be addressed. Specifically, this proposed small cell facility will improve AT&T’s wireless services by offloading network traffic carried by existing macro facilities in the area. In addition, faster data rates allow customers to get on and off the network quickly, which produces more efficient use of AT&T’s limited spectrum. By placing the small cell facility in areas where AT&T’s existing wireless telecommunications facilities are constrained and where AT&T experiences especially high network traffic, AT&T can address the existing and forecasted demand and support 5G speeds in the near future. Improving signal quality and increasing data speed is critical to providing the mobile experience customers demand and to manage the unprecedented increase in mobile data usage on AT&T’s network. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) tracks the rates at which American households are shifting from landlines to wireless telecommunications. According to the CDC’s latest Wireless Substitution Report, more than 70 percent of Americans rely exclusively or primarily on wireless communications in their homes.1 In addition, the FCC estimates that 70 percent of all 911 calls are made from wireless devices.2 And with AT&T’s selection by FirstNet as the wireless service provider to build and manage the nationwide first responder wireless network, each new or modified facility will help strengthen first responder communications. Description of Service and Site Type AT&T selected the proposed facility as the best available means to address its service objectives in this portion of the city. The proposed small cell facility will be located in the public right-of-way, where AT&T has a right to place its equipment pursuant to Section 7901 of the California Public Utilities Code. The proposed node is a Pico cell site and will provide 4G services to the surrounding area. The project will involve the placement of a small antenna and associated small cell equipment enclosed within a replacement streetlight. For this small 1See Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, January-June 2018, available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless201812.pdf. 2See 911 Wireless Services, available at https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/911-wireless-services. 45 Exhibit B Page 2 of 3 cell, AT&T proposes to install a 10-inch diameter omni-directional antenna and radios at the top of a replacement streetlight, fully concealed within a 12-inch diameter shroud. The facility will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic. It will not adversely affect the surrounding properties and will have a minimal physical and aesthetic footprint in this area. In addition, the proposed facility fully complies with applicable design criteria. Therefore, the City can easily make the necessary findings for approval for this small cell facility. The project scope will consist of the following: x Removal and replacement of a streetlight. x Installation of a single omni-directional antenna. x Installation of four remote radio units and raycap disconnect switch within a shroud. x Installation of below grade power and fiber handholds. Conformance with FCC Regulations The proposed low powered antenna installation attached to the utility pole is considered categorical excluded by the FCC based on the analysis included in the FCC Optional Checklist for Determination of the Local Official’s Guide to RF (attached). Installations that are categorically excluded are considered to meet or exceed the FCC standards for RF Emissions. Construction, Maintenance and Monitoring Construction of the proposed project will take approximately 30-days. All construction will be done in a manner that minimizes impact to residents and/or businesses in the area. Existing underground or overhead power and fiber connections will be used with minimal trenching. Directional boring will be used when deemed appropriate for each specific location. Maintenance of the subject facility is minimal. The telecom operator will be responsible for maintenance of the telecom facility including, but not limited to, any missing, discolored or damaged screening, all graffiti will be removed promptly, and the facility kept clean and free of litter. Monitoring is typically done from AT&T’s switching offices. If needed, a site visit to change any radio equipment will be coordinated with the city through the appropriate process. Site Preferred Location and Alternative Analysis The City of Newport Beach Code Section 20.49.040 lists the pref erred locations for telecommunication facilities to limit adverse visual effects and the proliferation of new or individual telecom facilities in the City. Class 3 is defined as public right-of-way installations where the facility can be installed on a structure located in the public right-of-way. The proposed AT&T small cell facility falls under this category and is the third on the list of preferred locations. The proposed installation is consistent with the approved city designs under the master agreement between AT&T and the City. Due to the slim design, camouflaged antenna, use of existing city structures within the right-of-way, AT&T believes that the changes to the existing streetlights are non-material or aesthetic changes that would not impact the surrounding development of this area. The other preferred locations as listed by code relate to the use of existing non-residential buildings or other structures, which are stealth and fully screened and not visible to the general public. These types of locations or structures are not feasible designs for small cells located within the public right-of-way. AT&T is committed to providing wireless telecommunications services and faster data rates throughout the City of Newport Beach and is doing so by installing the least intrusive technology, with the least intrusive design at the least intrusive locations. Rather than construct traditional tower facilities in or near residential 46 Exhibit B Page 3 of 3 neighborhoods, AT&T solution is to deploy very small facilities, called “small cells,” that can be installed on utility infrastructure in the public right-of-way. A small cell is a low-powered cell site, which, when grouped with other small cells, can provide coverage in areas where traditional macro wireless facilities are not feasible. Although the signal from each small cell antenna covers a shorter range than a conventional tower site, small cells can be effective tools to help close significant gaps in service coverage or offload capacity with a minimal visual impact. Node HBNPB_042 will help AT&T close a significant gap in this area of the City by the least intrusive means, see attached coverage maps. AT&T has evaluated other locations for this project in the immediate vicinity of the proposed node. Attached is the alternative site analysis with detailed description of each alternative. Statement of Code Compliance The overall site location and design complies with applicable code provisions, the General Plan, and other published siting guidelines. For further analysis regarding the applicable code, please see the attached Statement of Code Compliance. 47 © 2018 AT&T Intellectual Property. AT&T, Globe logo, and DIRECTV are registered trademarks and service marks of AT&T Intellectual Property and/or AT&T affiliated companies. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.AT&T Small CellSite ID: CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042Alternative Sites AnalysisMay 19, 2020City streetlight No. SLC4735 located in the center median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 50 feet south of the northeast corner of Kewamee Drive and Avocado Avenue, Newport Beach48 2Map of Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042 and Alternative SitesOn this aerial map, AT&T’s proposed Small Cell Polygon Node# HBNPB_042 is designated by a red marker and the alternative sites are identified by yellow markers.49 3Proposed Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042•AT&T is committed to providing and improving wireless telecommunications services and faster data ratesthroughout the City of Newport Beach.•Rather than construct traditional macro facilities, AT&T’s solution is to deploy very small facilities, called “smallcells,” that can be installed on utility infrastructure in the public right-of-way.•A small cell is a low-powered cell site, which, when grouped with other small cells, can provide coverage inareas where traditional macro wireless facilities are discouraged.•Small cells are effective tools to provide and improve critical wireless services with a minimal impact. By placing small cells in areas where AT&T’s existing facilities are constrained and where AT&T experiences high network traffic, AT&T can address existing and forecasted demands.•Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042 will improve signal quality and capacity within AT&T’swireless network.50 4• AT&T proposes to place Small Cell on a replacement city owned streetlight in the public right of way. (Lat/Long 33.604253, -117.877276). The proposed node is in the center median of Avocado Avenue at Kewamee Drive. The surrounding uses comprise of single and multi-family residential. Several tall palm and Eucalyptus trees are located through this community. • The proposed node would be in the median of Avocado Avenue, adjacent to an existing tree of similar height. The foliage of this tree and those in the background will provide a backdrop and a visual relief of the project as seen from several vantage points. • AT&T proposed node is a stealth facility under City Code §20.49.030(N) and is designed to be as visually inconspicuous as possible. The installation will be a small addition to the existing streetlight and will painted to match. • AT&T determined that this location is viable in thatnecessary utilities are available, and this location isfeasiblefrom a radio frequency perspective. The location is free of obstructions and has good line of site to meet coverage objectives.AT&T will need to install areplacementpole toaccommodate Small Cell.Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042 - Proposed LocationCity streetlight No. SLC4735 located in the center median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 50 feet south of the northeast corner of Kewamee Drive and Avocado Avenue.• Photo Simulation of Proposed Small Cell51 5• Alternative Site #1 is a city streetlight in the public right- of-way. The site is in a landscaped median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 150 feet southwest of the subject node. • The streetlight is located between large mature Eucalyptus trees that are approximately 30 feet away from the existing streetlight. The foliage of these trees are taller than the streetlight. Screening of the proposed installation would be more difficult at this location due to the larger separation between the streetlight and the lack of foliage of these trees. • Small cell at this alternative location would be more visually intrusive and was not selected for this project. Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042 – Alternative Site #1City streetlight No. SLC4734 located in the center median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 155 feet south of the northeast corner of Kewamee Drive and Avocado Avenue.52 6• Alternative Site #2 is a city streetlight in thepublic right- of-way. This site is in the landscaped median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 240 feet northeast of the subject node. • The streetlight is within a landscaped portion adjacent to a pedestrian ramp. • Unlike the proposed node location the streetlight, this alternative location does not have nearby trees to visually screen the proposed small cell installation. • Small cell at this alternative location would be more visually intrusive and was not selected for this project. Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042 – Alternative Site #2City streetlight No. SLC4736 located in the center median of Avocado Avenue at the corner of 4thAvenue. 53 7• Alternative Site #3 is a city streetlight in thepublic right- of-way. This alternative site is approximately 310 feet northwest of the subject node. • The streetlight is within the sidewalk portion of the street right-of-way. A two-story condominium building is adjacent to this alternative site. • The space between the streetlight and back of sidewalk is narrow and would limit the replacement of this streetlight to meet ADA requirements.• A small cell at this alternative location is infeasible.Polygon Node# CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042 – Alternative Site #3City streetlight No. SLC4720, located on the north side of Kewamee Drive, approximately center median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 310 feet northwest of the Avocado Avenue.54 8Proposed Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042Conclusion•The proposed small cell node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042 is an integral part of an overall small cell solutionto helpclose AT&T’s significant service coverage gap in this portion of Newport Beach.•The proposed small cell will provide wireless telecommunications service and faster data rates to the area businesses, residents & visitors.•The proposed small cell is the best available and least intrusive means to help AT&T provide and improve critical wireless services in the surrounding areas, adding low-power, low-profile equipment to utility infrastructure in the public right-of-way.•The use of a replacement streetlight allows a stealth design for the proposed equipment and antenna.•The proposed installation will enhance wireless communication with the least visual impact to the community. 55 Statement of Code Compliance with Newport Beach Municipal Code (“NBMC”) Chapter 20.49 and Chapter 13.20 Below, we identify the applicable code criteria and demonstrate our compliance or acknowledgement of each provision. 20.49.040 Telecom Facility Preferences and Prohibited Locations. A. Preferred Locations. To limit the adverse visual effects of and proliferation of new or individual telecom facilities in the City, the following list establishes the order of preference of facilities, from the most preferred (1) to least preferred (4). 1. Collocation of a new facility at an existing facility. 2. Class 1. 3. Class 2 and Class 3. 4. Class 4. B. Prohibited Locations. Telecom facilities are prohibited in the following locations: Applicant Response: AT&T is proposing a Class 3 facility that replaces an existing concrete designed streetlight with a new similar concrete designed replacement pole. The design is consistent with the design of the existing pole and the type of infrastructure currently in the right of way. The design is consistent with the designs depicted and allowed pursuant to the Master License Agreement Between the City of Newport Beach and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC for the Use of City-Owned Streetlights for Telecommunication Facilities (“MLA”). As explained in the previous Alternative Analysis, a collocation or Class 1 or 2 facility would not be technically feasible in this location from an RF or construction perspective. Small cells are low power and must be located at the precise location selected to serve the network traffic demands of that specific and limited area. This type of service enhancement cannot be accomplished with a traditional macro collocation or building mounted site in this area. The site is not located in any of the locations prohibited by NBMC §20.49.040.B.1-4. 20.49.050 General Development and Design Standards. A. General Criteria. All telecom facilities shall employ design techniques to minimize visual impacts and provide appropriate screening to result in the least visually intrusive means of providing the service. Such techniques shall be employed to make the installation, appearance and operations of the facility as visually inconspicuous as practicable. To the greatest extent feasible, facilities shall be designed to minimize the visual impact of the facility by means of location, placement, height, screening, landscaping, and shall be compatible with existing architectural elements, building materials, other building characteristics, and the surrounding area. Applicant Response: The Applicant has selected a design that minimizes visual impacts and is appropriately screened to result in the least visually intrusive means of providing service. The site will be placed in the right- of-way and will be virtually unnoticeable as this is the type of infrastructure one would expect to see in the 56 right-of-way. The facility is compatible with the architectural design of existing right-of-way infrastructure with respect to color, materials, scale and compatibility with the surrounding area. It matches the existing pole in scale and design and will not result in any net add of right-of-way infrastructure. Utilities are placed below grade and are not visible. In addition to the other design standards of this section, the following criteria shall be considered by the review authority in connection with its processing of any MUP, CUP, LTP, or ZC for a telecom facility: 1. Blending. The extent to which the proposed telecom facility blends into the surrounding environment or is architecturally compatible and integrated into the structure. Applicant Response: The facility blends into the surrounding environment and is compatible and integrated into the replacement structure. It matches the existing pole in terms of scale, color and materials and is consistent with expected infrastructure that exists in the right-of-way. 2. Screening. The extent to which the proposed telecom facility is concealed or screened by existing or proposed new topography, vegetation, buildings or other structures. Applicant Response: The site is screened to the extent that it matches and is concealed within a streetlight replacement pole. 3. Size. The total size of the proposed telecom facility, particularly in relation to surrounding and supporting structures. Applicant Response: The scale and total size of the proposed facility is consistent with existing right-of-way infrastructure. The new luminaire is consistent with the size, location and functioning of the luminaire being replaced. The 9.25” diameter of the new pole is consistent with and substantially similar to the diameter of the existing pole which is 9” at the location being measured. The pole height is almost identical except for the antenna enclosure at the top, which is also consistent with the design in terms of scale and width. The presence of communication equipment at this site will be virtually unnoticeable to the casual passerby. 4. Location. Proposed telecom facilities shall be located so as to utilize existing natural or manmade features in the vicinity of the facility, including topography, vegetation, buildings, or other structures to provide the greatest amount of visual screening and blending with the predominant visual backdrop. Applicant Response: The location in the right-of-way is appropriate as it is consistent with infrastructure expected to be located in the right-of-way. One of the purposes of the right-of-way is to accommodate infrastructure that will serve the needs of the community, so it is the appropriate place for this type of facility. 5. Collocation. In evaluating whether the collocation of a telecom facility is feasible, the criteria listed in subsections (A)(1) through (4) of this section shall be used to evaluate the visual effect of the combined number of facilities at the proposed location. Applicant Response: Collocation on this facility is not technically feasible from an RF and construction standpoint. Requiring a collocation on this facility would increase the visual impact and scale of this site. 57 B. Public View Protection. All new or modified telecom facilities, whether approved by administrative or discretionary review, shall comply with Section 20.30.100 (Public View Protection). Additionally, potential impacts from a new or modified telecom facility to public views that are not identified by General Plan Policy NR 20.3 shall be evaluated to determine if inclusion in Policy NR 20.3 would be appropriate. If deemed appropriate for inclusion, the potential impacts to such public views shall be considered. Applicant Response: This section is not applicable to this facility as it is not in an area that is subject to Public View Protection. C. Height. 1. The Planning Commission or City Council may approve or conditionally approve a CUP for a telecom facility that exceeds the maximum height limit for the zoning district in which the facility is located; provided, it does not exceed the maximum height limit by fifteen (15) feet, only after making all of the required findings in Section 20.49.060(H) (Required Findings for Telecom Facilities). Applicant Response: The height limitation for facilities located in the public right-of-way is 35 feet. NBMC §20.49.050.C.3. The facility complies with this standard as it does not exceed 35 feet. 2. All telecom facilities shall comply with height restrictions or conditions, if any, required by the Federal Aviation Administration, and shall comply with Section 20.30.060(E) (Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport and Airport Land Use Commission Review Requirements) as may be in force at the time the telecom facility is permitted or modified. Applicant Response: This provision is not applicable to this facility. 3. Telecom facilities installed on streetlights, utility poles, utility towers or other similar structures within the public right-of-way shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height above the finished grade. Applicant Response: The facility complies with this standard as it does not exceed 35 feet. 4. Telecom facilities may be installed on existing utility poles or utility towers that exceed thirty-five (35) feet above the finished grade where the purposes of the existing utility pole or utility tower is to carry electricity or provide other wireless data transmission; provided, that the top of the proposed antennas do not extend above the top of the utility pole or utility tower. Applicant Response: This provision is not applicable to this facility. 5. Telecom facilities disguised as flagpoles may be installed provided they meet applicable height limits for flagpoles provided in Section 20.30.060. Applicant Response: This provision is not applicable to this facility. 58 D. Setbacks. Proposed telecom facilities shall comply with the required setback established by the development standards for the zoning district in which the facility is proposed to be located. Setbacks shall be measured from the part of the facility closest to the applicable lot line or structure. Applicant Response: This provision is not applicable as the facility is located in the right-of-way and replaces an existing structure. Also, the code specifically provides for a setback exception for light standards. NBMC § 20.30.110.D.11. E. Design Techniques. Design techniques shall result in the installation of a telecom facility that is in harmony and scale with the surrounding area, screens the installation from view, and prevents the facility from visually dominating the surrounding area. Design techniques may include the following: Applicant Response: The facility is in harmony and scale with the surrounding area. The new concrete designed pole is substantially similar in size and scale to the existing pole and the materials, design and color match. The facility is compatible with infrastructure that exists in the right-of-way and will be installed in the same location as the pole that is being replaced. The facility will not visually dominate the surrounding area. 1. Screening elements to disguise, or otherwise hide the telecom facility from view from surrounding uses. Applicant Response: The facility is a combination light pole and wireless facility and the antennas and other equipment components will be concealed within the pole. 2. Painting and/or coloring the telecom facility to blend into the predominant visual backdrop. Applicant Response: The facility will be concealed within a light pole and will be the same color and finish as the pole being replaced. 3. Siting the telecom facility to utilize existing features (such as buildings, topography, vegetation, etc.) to screen or hide the facility. Applicant Response: The facility is being sited in the right-of-way and will be installed in the same location as the pole being replaced and will have the same color and finish. 4. Utilizing simulated natural features (trees, rocks, etc.) to screen or hide the telecom facility. Applicant Response: The facility is a light pole replacement, a structure that is expected to be located in the right-of-way, will be installed in the same location as the pole being replaced, and will have the same color and finish. 5. Providing telecom facilities of a size that, as determined by the City, is not visually obtrusive such that any effort to screen the facility would create greater visual impacts than the facility itself. Applicant Response: The facility is not visually obtrusive and is consistent with the size, scale, color and appearance of existing right-of-way infrastructure. 59 6. To the greatest extent practicable, new Class 4 facilities shall be designed and sited to facilitate the collocation of one additional telecom operator. Applicant Response: This criterion is not applicable as this facility is not a Class 4. F. Screening Standards. For collocation installations, the screening method shall be materially similar to those used on the existing telecom facility, and shall not diminish the screening of the facility. If determined necessary by the review authority, use of other improved and appropriate screening methods may be required to screen the antennas and support equipment from public view. The following is a non-exclusive list of potential design and screening techniques that must be considered for all facility installations: Applicant Response: This criterion is not applicable as this facility is not a collocation. 3. For Class 3 (Public Right-of-Way) Installations. a. Whenever feasible, new antennas proposed to be installed in the public right-of-way shall be placed on existing utility structures, streetlights, or other existing vertical structures. Antenna installations on existing or replacement streetlight poles or utility poles shall be screened by means of canisters, radomes, shrouds other screening measures whenever feasible, and treated with exterior coatings of a color and texture to match the existing pole. Applicant Response: The facility design meets this criterion. The antenna is screened behind a cannister that is on top of the pole. It will be the same color and texture as the existing pole. b. New or replacement vertical structures may be allowed when authorized by the Municipal Code and approved by the Public Works Department. Replacement poles or streetlights shall be consistent with the size, shape, style, and design of the existing pole, including any attached light arms. New poles or streetlights may be installed, provided they match existing or planned poles within the area. Applicant Response: The facility design meets this criterion and is allowed pursuant to the NBMC and the MLA. This replacement pole is substantially the same size, shape, style and design of the existing pole. It also has a luminaire that is the same height and brightness as the existing pole. c. If antennas are proposed to be installed without screening, they shall be flush-mounted to the pole and shall be treated with exterior coatings of a color and texture to match the pole. Applicant Response: This provision is not applicable as the antennas will be screened. 6. Support Equipment. All support equipment associated with the operation of any telecom facility shall be placed or mounted in the least visually obtrusive location practicable, and shall be screened from view. Applicant Response: Support equipment is either concealed or installed below grade and has no visual impact. b. Installations in a Public Right-of-Way. The following is a non-exclusive list of potential screening techniques for telecom facilities located in a public right-of-way: 60 i. Where existing utilities services (e.g., telephone, power, cable TV) are located underground, the support equipment shall be placed underground if required by other provisions of the Municipal Code. Flush-to-grade underground vault enclosures, including flush-to-grade vents, or vents that extend no more than twenty-four (24) inches above the finished grade and are screened from public view may be incorporated. Electrical meters required for the purpose of providing power for the proposed telecom facility may be installed above ground on a pedestal in a public right-of-way provided they meet applicable standards of Title 13 unless otherwise precluded by the Municipal Code. Applicant Response: The utilities serving this facility are either installed below grade or are concealed within the replacement pole. No above ground pedestals are proposed. ii. Support equipment approved to be located above ground in a public right-of-way shall be painted or otherwise coated to be visually compatible with the existing or replacement pole, lighting and/or traffic signal equipment without substantially increasing the width of the structure. Applicant Response: This provision is not applicable as no above ground support equipment is proposed. iii. All transmission or amplification equipment such as remote radio units, tower mounted amplifiers, and surge suppressors shall be mounted inside the utility or streetlight pole without materially increasing the pole diameter or shall be installed in the vault enclosure supporting the facility. Applicant Response: The transmission equipment is concealed within the pole. G. Night Lighting. Telecom facilities shall not be lighted except for security lighting at the lowest intensity necessary for that purpose or as may be recommended by the United States Flag Code (4 U.S.C. Section 1 et seq.). Such lighting shall be shielded so that direct illumination does not directly shine on nearby properties. The review authority shall consult with the Police Department regarding proposed security lighting for facilities on a case-by-case basis. Applicant Response: No lighting is proposed other than the replacement luminaire which is being installed at substantially the same height and is the same brightness as the existing pole. H. Signs and Advertising. No advertising signage or identifying logos shall be displayed on any telecom facility except for small identification, address, warning, and similar information plates. Such information plates shall be identified in the telecom application and shall be subject to approval by the review authority. Signage required by State or Federal regulations shall be allowed in its smallest permissible size. Applicant Response: The facility complies with this criterion. The only signage proposed is the required notice signage, facility owner information and signage and banners required to be installed by the City. I. Nonconformities. A proposed or modified telecom facility shall not create any new or increased nonconformity as defined in the Zoning Code, such as, but not limited to, a reduction in and/or elimination of, required parking, landscaping, or loading zones unless relief is sought pursuant to applicable zoning code procedures. 61 Applicant Response: The facility complies with the code and will not create a zoning code nonconformity. J. Maintenance. The telecom operator shall be responsible for maintenance of the telecom facility in a manner consistent with the original approval of the facility, including but not limited to the following: 1. Any missing, discolored, or damaged screening shall be restored to its original permitted condition. Applicant Response: The Applicant acknowledges that it is responsible for maintaining the site consistent with its original permitted condition. 2. All graffiti on any components of the telecom facility shall be removed promptly in accordance with the Municipal Code. Applicant Response: The Applicant acknowledges this requirement. 3. All landscaping required for the telecom facility shall be maintained in a healthy condition at all times, and shall be promptly replaced if dead, dying, or damaged. Applicant Response: No landscaping is proposed for this installation. 4. All telecom facilities shall be kept clean and free of litter. Applicant Response: The Applicant acknowledges this requirement. 5. All equipment cabinets shall display a legible contact number for reporting maintenance problems to the telecom operator. Applicant Response: The Applicant is not proposing equipment cabinets. 6. If a flagpole is used for a telecom facility, flags shall be flown and shall be properly maintained at all times. The use of the United States flag shall comply with the provisions of the U.S. Flag Code (4 U.S.C. Section 1 et seq.). (Ord. 2014-1 § 10 (part), 2014) Applicant Response: The Applicant is not proposing a flagpole. 20.49.060 Permit Review Procedures. H. Required Findings for Telecom Facilities. The following findings shall apply to all facilities requiring discretionary review: 1. General. The review authority may approve or conditionally approve an application for a telecom facility only after first finding each of the required findings for a MUP or CUP pursuant to Section 20.52.020 (Conditional Use Permits and Minor Use Permits), or an LTP pursuant to Section 20.52.040 (Limited Term Permits), and each of the following findings: a. The proposed telecom facility is visually compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. 62 Applicant Response: The facility is visually compatible with the surrounding area. The facility design is allowed pursuant to the MLA and applicable code and is substantially similar in design, shape, size, color and texture as the existing pole. All related equipment is either installed below grade or is concealed within the interior of the replacement light pole. b. The proposed telecom facility complies with height, location and design standards, as provided for in this chapter. Applicant Response: The 27.5-foot-tall facility complies with the height, location and design standards. It is a Class 3 facility located in the right-of-way and meets the City approved design standards per the code and the MLA. c. An alternative site(s) located further from a residential district, public park or public facility cannot feasibly fulfill the coverage needs fulfilled by the installation at the proposed site. Applicant Response: The Applicant has provided an alternative analysis that addresses this criterion. No alternative site locations would fulfill the network needs that are fulfilled by this installation at this proposed specific location. d. An alternative plan that would result in a higher preference facility class category for the proposed facility is not available or reasonably feasible and desirable under the circumstances. Applicant Response: As explained previously, small cells are designed to enhance network capacity and must be precisely located in a specific area to properly function due to their low power and limited range. A higher preference class facility would not be technically feasible and would not fulfill this specific network need. 63 Attachment No. ZA 6 Photographic Visual Simulations 64 NEW BELOW GRADE HANDHOLESNEW REPLACED 9.75" DIASTREETLIGHT, TOTAL HEIGHT 27'-5"INCLUDING SHROUD AND ANTENNANEW 12" DIA EQUIPMENT SHROUD WITHRADIOS AND RAYCAP DISCONNECTMOUNTED TO REPLACED STREETLIGHTNEW ANTENNAMOUNTED ON NEWEQUIPMENT SHROUDCity streetlight No. SLC4735 located in the center median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 50 feet south of the northeast corner of Kewamee Drive and Avocado Avenue, Corona Del Mar65 NEW ANTENNAMOUNTED ON NEWEQUIPMENT SHROUDNEW 12" DIA EQUIPMENT SHROUD WITHRADIOS AND RAYCAP DISCONNECTMOUNTED TO REPLACED STREETLIGHTNEW REPLACED 9.75" DIASTREETLIGHT, TOTAL HEIGHT 27'-5"INCLUDING SHROUD AND ANTENNANEW BELOW GRADE HANDHOLESCity streetlight No. SLC4735 located in the center median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 50 feet south of the northeast corner of Kewamee Drive and Avocado Avenue, Corona Del Mar66 NEW ANTENNAMOUNTED ON NEWEQUIPMENT SHROUDNEW 12" DIA EQUIPMENT SHROUD WITHRADIOS AND RAYCAP DISCONNECTMOUNTED TO REPLACED STREETLIGHTNEW REPLACED 9.75" DIASTREETLIGHT, TOTAL HEIGHT 27'-5"INCLUDING SHROUD AND ANTENNANEW BELOW GRADE HANDHOLESCity streetlight No. SLC4735 located in the center median of Avocado Avenue, approximately 50 feet south of the northeast corner of Kewamee Drive and Avocado Avenue, Corona Del Mar67 Attachment No. ZA 7 Project Plans 68 TITLE SHEETT-1SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D03/14/19 REVISIONE06/07/19 REVISIONDATE SIGNED: 05/12/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/2021F 09/16/19100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G 09/27/19100% CD'S REVISEDH 10/17/19100% CD'S REVISEDI12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ 02/11/20 100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020100% CD'S REVISEDLDIRECTIONS FROM AT&T OFFICE:DIRECTION ARE TAKEN FROM1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 927801. TURN LEFT ONTO EDINGER AVE2. TURN LEFT ONTO 55 S3. TAKE EXIT 5A TOWARD STATE ROUTE 734. TAKE EXIT 14A TO MERGE ONTO MACARTHUR BLVD5. TURN RIGHT ONTO CA-1N6. TURN LEFT ONTO AVOCADO AVEDESTINATION WILL BE ON THE LEFT.CITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735 LOCATED IN THE CENTER MEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NE CORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVE AND AVOCADO AVENUE,CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665PROJECT SITE INFORMATIONPROJECT TEAMCODE COMPLIANCECONSTRUCTION DRAWINGDIG ALERTIF USING 11"x17" PLOT, DRAWING WILL BE HALF SCALEDRAWING INDEXT-1 TITLE SHEETSHEET TITLEA-1GN-1 GENERAL NOTESA-2 ELEVATIONSGENERAL NOTES SITE PLANAREA MAPSVICINITY MAPLOCATION MAPDRIVING DIRECTIONSNENESESWWNWSPROJECT DESCRIPTIONSITE NAME: HBNPB_042AKnow what'sbelow.Callbefore you dig.Dig AlertCALIFORNIA SOUTHCall Two Working Days Before You Dig!811 / 800-422-4133A-3 ELEVATIONSTHE FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. A TECHNICIAN WILLVISIT THE SITE AS REQUIRED FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE. THE PROJECT WILL NOTRESULT IN ANY SIGNIFICANT DISTURBANCE OR EFFECT ON DRAINAGE; NO SANITARYSEWER SERVICE, POTABLE WATER, OR TRASH DISPOSAL IS REQUIRED AND NOCOMMERCIAL SIGNAGE IS NEW.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THELOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BECONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES.1. 2016 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE2. 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE3. 2016 CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC CODE4. 2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE5. 2016 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE6. 2016 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE7. ANY LOCAL BUILDING CODE AMENDMENTS TO THE ABOVE8. CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES9. NEC, NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE10. CALIFORNIA TRAFFIC CONTROL LANE CLOSURES MUTCDHANDICAP REQUIREMENTS:FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESSNOT REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE STATE CODEPART 2, TITLE 24, CHAPTER 11B, SECTION 1103B.DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGSSUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS & EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ONTHE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANYDISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME.APPROVALSAT&T RF ENGINEER:SITE ACQUISITION MANAGER:PROJECT MANAGER:ZONING VENDOR:A/E MANAGER:LEASING VENDOR:CONSTRUCTION MANAGER:PROPERTY OWNER:APPROVED BY:INITIALS: DATE:AT&T OPERATIONS:THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HEREBY APPROVE AND ACCEPT THESE DOCUMENTS & AUTHORIZETHE SUBCONTRACTOR TO PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBED HEREIN. ALLDOCUMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT & MAY IMPOSECHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS.D-2 DETAILSSHEETSITE NUMBER: CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042USID: 188448/ FA: 14807371CITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735 LOCATED IN THECENTER MEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE, APPROX.50' S OF THE NE CORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVE ANDAVOCADO AVENUE, CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665PACE: MRLOS045348NENESESWWNWSD-1 DETAILS ELECTRICAL & GROUNDING DETAILSE-1 POLE DETAILSS-1POLE ID #: SLC4735PROJECT: CRAN/ DGM SMALL CELL/ PICOPOLE TYPE: (N) CONCRETE LIGHT POLEUTILITY MANAGER:ENGINEER:M SQUARED WIRELESS1387 CALLE AVANZADOSAN CLEMENTE, CA 92673PUBLIC/PRIVATE:AT&T1452 EDINGER AVETUSTIN, CA 92780-117.87726133.604239APPLICANT:ADDRESS:LAT/LONG TYPE:LONGITUDE (NAD 83):LATITUDE (NAD 83):NAD-83PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYADDRESS:CITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735 LOCATED IN THECENTER MEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE, APPROX. 50' SOF THE NE CORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVE ANDAVOCADO AVENUE,CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665PROJECT MANAGER:M SQUARED WIRELESS1387 CALLE AVANZADOSAN CLEMENTE, CA 92673GROUND ELEVATION (NAVD 88)±89.73'JURISDICTION: CITY OF CORONA DEL MARSAC/ZONING/PERMITTING:M SQUARED WIRELESS1387 CALLE AVANZADOSAN CLEMENTE, CA 92673RF ENGINEER:AT&T1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780CONTACT: KARLO DAVINAGRACIAEMAIL: KD270J@ATT.COMUNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONSPROPOSED USE:CURRENT ZONING: PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYPOWER COMPANY:ADDRESS:A-4 SITE IMAGESCE1 INNOVATION WAYPOMONA, CA 91768AT&T PROPOSES TO INSTALL A NEW WIRELESS INSTALLATION LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTOF WAY TO (N) CONCRETE LIGHT POLE.4G SCOPE WILL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING:* AT&T TO REMOVE (1) EXISTING CONCRETE STREETLIGHT* AT&T TO INSTALL (1) 22'-0" CONCRETE STREETLIGHT* AT&T TO INSTALL (3) NEW AT&T REMOTE RADIO UNITS + (1) FUTURE RADIO* AT&T TO INSTALL (1) NEW AT&T OMNI-DIRECTIONAL ANTENNA* AT&T TO INSTALL (1) NEW AT&T EQUIPMENT SHROUD* AT&T TO INSTALL (1) NEW RAYCAP DISCONNECT* AT&T TO INSTALL (3) NEW HANDHOLESLATITUDE/LONGITUDE: 33.604239/ -117.877261SENIOR TECHNICAL PROJECT MANAGER:AT&T1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780CONTACT: TED SUEKAWAEMAIL: TS4994@ATT.COMD-3 NEWPORT BEACH DETAILS TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANTCP-1 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANTCP-2NO:SHEETNO:SHEET TITLESCE FINAL DESIGNSCE-1SCE FINAL DESIGNSCE-2SCE FINAL DESIGNSCE-3T-21-A ACCURACY CERTIFICATIONC-1TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYADAPTER PLATE DETAILSS-2SCE FINAL DESIGND-4 LUMINAIRE SPECSCITY NOTECONCRETE FOUNDATION (CONTINUOUS INSPECTION).SPECIAL INSPECTION1. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND NEW TCP WILLBE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED AS PART OF THE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.SCE-4SCE FINAL DESIGN69 1-A ACCURACYCERTIFICATIONT-2SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D 03/14/19 REVISIONE 06/07/19 REVISIONF09/16/19 100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G09/27/19 100% CD'S REVISEDH 10/17/19100% CD'S REVISEDI 12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ02/11/20100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020 100% CD'S REVISEDL1-A ACCURACY CERTIFICATION170 GENERAL NOTESGN-1SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D 03/14/19 REVISIONE 06/07/19 REVISIONDATE SIGNED: 05/12/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/2021F09/16/19 100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G09/27/19 100% CD'S REVISEDH 10/17/19100% CD'S REVISEDI 12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ02/11/20100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020 100% CD'S REVISEDLABBREVIATIONSGENERAL NOTESABBREVIATIONS431NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL NOTES2STREET & ALLEY MORATORIUM LIST ON EXCAVATIONAS OF JULY 1, 2019STREET NAMELIMITSFROM TOMORATORIUMEND DATECOUNCILACCEPTANCE DATEAVOCADO AVE EAST COAST HWY WATERFRONT DR 11/22/2019 11/22/2016WS71 SITE SURVEYTOPOGRAPHICSURVEYCRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_042606 AVOCADO AVENUE CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665REVDESCRIPTIONDATE BYC-1CHARLES L. SCOTT III, PLS 8742EXP.12/31/2020 Registration No. in the State of California.ERICSSON330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602CHARLES L. SSSSSCOTT XP 12/31/2020 Registration Noin72 3'-0"3'-0"A-1SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D03/14/19 REVISIONE 06/07/19 REVISIONDATE SIGNED: 05/12/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/2021F 09/16/19100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G 09/27/19100% CD'S REVISEDH10/17/19 100% CD'S REVISEDI12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ 02/11/20 100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020100% CD'S REVISEDLSITE PLANNENESESWWNWSENLARGED SITE PLANNENESESWWNWS21(E) SIDEWALK (TYP.)SITE PLAN(E) TREE (TYP.)NEW AT&T PROJECT LOCATION.SEE ENLARGED SITE PLAN2-ROWC/FCLBUILDING(TYP.)CLROWROWROWROWCLCLCLROWROWC/FC/FC/FC/FC/FC/FC/FC/FC/FC/FC/F(E) STREETLIGHT (TYP.)110'-0"10'-0"75'-0"15'-0"10'-0"60'-0"11'-0"19'-0"19'-0"11'-0"38'-0"50'-0"10'-0"15'-0"15'-0"10'-0"30'-0"±33'-9" TO ℄OF KEWAMEE DRROWROWROWROWCLC/FC/FC/FC/FC/FC/F(E) SIDEWALK (TYP.)(E) TREE (TYP.)CLCL45'-0"BUILDING(TYP.)BUILDING(TYP.)BUILDING(TYP.)BUILDING(TYP.)(E) HANDHOLE(E) REFLECTOR, TYP.NOTE:1. IF DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON PLAN DO NOT SCALE CORRECTLY, CHECK FOR REDUCTION OR ENLARGEMENTFROM ORIGINAL PLANS.2. CONTRACTORS TO VERIFY SUB STRUCTURE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION.3. ALL CONDUCTORS/ WIRES & CONDUIT, SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A NEAT & TIDY FASHION. ALL EXCESS WIRESLACK IS TO BE REMOVED & HIDDEN AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.4. ALL NEWLY INSTALLED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING POLE, & OR SURROUNDINGSUNLESS PROHIBITED PER MANUFACTURER.5. NEW FIBER CONDUIT TO BE STUBBED OUT OF NEW POLE FOOTING BY APPROX. 2'-0".6. POWER SUPPLY AND RUN ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE PER SCE FINAL DESIGN.7. WHERE REMOVED OR DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION, ALL, CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BEREPLACED IN ENTIRE SECTIONS BETWEEN EXPANSION JOINTS. NO SAW CUTTING AND PARTIAL PATCHINGSHALL BE PERMITTED. ALL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR REPLACEMENT SECTIONS SHALL BE PER CITY OFNEWPORT BEACH STANDARD DRAWINGS.8. AVOCADO AVENUE AND THIRD AVE IS ON THE CITY'S STREET/ALLEY-CUT MORATORIUM LIST. TRENCHINGINTO SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL REQUIRED EXTENSIVE ALLEY REPAIRWORK. DETAILS OF SUCH REPAIR WORK MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.1,5D-31,5D-31S-11-5D-17D-11S-11-5D-111'-0"1-2A-21-2A-3±33'-9" TO ℄OF KEWAMEE DR11'-6"℄℄℄℄℄℄REPAINT CURBIF DAMAGEDNOTE:1. REPAINT PAINTED CURB IF DAMAGED OR IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PUBLICWORKS INSPECTOR.2. PROTECT EXISTING STREET TREE IN PLACE.EXISTING ELECTRICAL SUBSTRUCTURELINE ±4'-0" SE / ℄ EXISTING ELECTRICAL SUBSTRUCTURELINE ±5'-0" SE / ℄ (E) SLOPE1/4" / FT(E) SLOPE1/4" / FTROWCLROW14'-0"11'-0"6'-0"2'-1"85'-0"3,5D-37-9D-11,5D-310'-0"16'-11"6'-0"(N) PROTECTIVEBOLLARD POST91'-0"LIMITS OF WORK18'-0"1SCE-11SCE-11SCE-17D-18'-0"3,5D-31SCE-11SCE-17D-11SCE-11SCE-17D-11SCE-12'-0"2'-0"3,5D-31SCE-173 Stay BackRadio-frequency energymay exceed exposure limits.If questions, contact facility owner.Please Reference Site IDPhone: (877) 231-5447E-mail: atttowers@att.comIn case of Emergency ContactAT&T TOWERSSite ID FCC ID2'-4"11"1'-1"SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D 03/14/19 REVISIONE 06/07/19 REVISIONDATE SIGNED: 05/12/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/2021F09/16/19 100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G09/27/19 100% CD'S REVISEDH 10/17/19100% CD'S REVISEDI 12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ02/11/20100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020 100% CD'S REVISEDLELEVATIONSA-212NEW SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONEXISTING SOUTHWEST ELEVATION±19'-11" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) POLE±0'-0" A.G.L.(E) GROUND LEVEL±0'-0" A.G.L.(E) GROUND LEVEL±25'-5" A.G.L.B/ OF (N) ANTENNA±27'-5" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) ANTENNA±26'-5" A.G.L.C/L OF (N) ANTENNA±25'-5" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) EQUIPMENT SHROUD±22'-0" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) POLE±22'-0" A.G.L.B/ OF (N) EQUIPMENT SHROUD(N) ANTENNA MOUNTED ON(N) EQUIPMENT SHROUD(N) POLE FOUNDATION(BY AT&T)(N) EQUIPMENT SHROUD W/ (2) (N) AT&T2203 RADIO, (1) (N) 2205 RADIOS (1)FUTURE 2205 RADIO & (1) (N) RAYCAPDISCONNECT SWITCH WITHIN SHROUD(N) FIBER BOX(BEYOND) (BY AT&TWIRELINE UNDERSEPARATE PERMIT)1D-12-5D-17D-1±21'-1" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) LEFT LUMINAIRE±21'-1" A.G.L.T/ OF LEFT (E) LUMINAIRE SENSOR(E) POLE FOUNDATION TO BEREMOVED & REPLACED (BY AT&T)(E) STREET SIGNAGE TO BE BERELOCATED TO (N) POLE(E) STREET SIGNAGE TO BE BERELOCATED TO (N) POLEDAMAGED / DIRTY SIGNS TO BEREPLACED BY CONTRACTOR, TYP.(E) STREET SIGNAGE TO BE BERELOCATED TO (N) POLE(E) HANDHOLE±10'-8" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±9'-10" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±4'-7" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE(E) RELOCATEDSTREET SIGNAGE(E) HANDHOLE(E) SIGNAGE RELOCATEDOR REPLACED IN-KIND(E) RELOCATED STREET SIGNAGEDAMAGED / DIRTY SIGNS TO BEREPLACED BY CONTRACTOR, TYP.(N) EMERGENCYCONTACT SIGN(N) ANTENNA SIGN2D-22D-2NOTE:1. ALL NEW EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PAINTED TOMATCH (E) CONCRETE LIGHT POLE2. RE-USE (E) LED LUMINAIRE. IF NOT LED,REPLACE WITH (N) LED LUMINAIREAPPROVED BY THE CITY.3. STREET SIGNS RELOCATED TO TEMPORARYPOLE DURING CONSTRUCTION.RE-USE (E) LEDLUMINAIRE, SEE NOTE 2(N) NEWPORT BEACH CONCRETESTREETLIGHT (SLC4735) (BY AT&T)-S-1(E) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CONCRETESTREETLIGHT (SLC4735) TO BE REMOVED &REPLACED (BY AT&T)(N) U/G FIBER CONDUIT(N) U/G POWER CONDUIT1D-2±9"Ø @ 40" A.G.L±914" Ø @ 14"A.G.LCONTRACTOR/AT&T SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING:1. EXISTING STREET TREES TO BE PROTECTED.2. IF SIGNS ARE DIRTY OR DAMAGED, THEY ARE TO BE REPLACED BY CONTRACTOR.3. PAINTED CURBS TO BE REPAINT IF DAMAGED OR IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BYTHE PUBLIC WORK INSPECTOR.4. CONTRACTOR TO RETURN (E) STREET LIGHT AND LIGHT ARM TO THE CITY OFNEWPORT BEACH UTILITIES YARD. IF DAMAGED DURING THE REMOVAL,CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PURCHASE AND DELIVER A REPLACEMENT.CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH UTILITIES YARD: 949 W. 16TH STREET NEWPORT BEACHCA 92663. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF THE EXISTING STREET LIGHT POLEAND ARMS IF UNWANTED BY THE CITY FOR ANY REASON.5. ALL WORK TO EXISTING CONDUITS, WIRES, GROUND/PULL BOXES SHALL COMPLYWITH "CITY" STANDARDS DOCUMENTATION AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS &UTILITIES STAFF.6. ALL ABANDON CIRCUIT CONDUITS, WIRES, GROUND/PULL BOXES REMOVE &RESTORATION TO SIDEWALK, NEW.7. DISPOSAL OF EXISTING STREET LIGHT STANDARD IF UNWANTED FOR ANY REASON.8'-2"8'-2"1'-8"C/FC/F8'-2"8'-2"1'-8"C/FC/FFUTURE BANNER & BRACKETLOCATION (BY OTHERS)±18'-9" A.G.L.TOP OF FUTURE BANNER8'-0"(E) SLOPE1/4" / FT(E) SLOPE1/4" / FT6'-0"2'-6"±18'-5" A.G.L.TOP OF RF SIGNAGE(E) TREE, TYP.(E) TREE, TYP.2'-6"±5'-0" A.G.L.T/ OF CONTACT INFO SIGN5D-2±2'-7" A.G.L.B/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±7'-4" A.G.L.B/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±10'-3" A.G.L.B/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±10'-8" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±9'-10" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±4'-7" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE4'-0"4'-0"±20'-11" A.G.L.T/ OF RIGHT (E) LUMINAIRE SENSOR±20'-11" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) RIGHT LUMINAIRE(E) LED LUMINAIRE TO BE RELOCATED4'-4"(N) ADAPTER PLATE-S-2--D-4NORTH-EASTSOUTH-WESTNORTH-EASTSOUTH-WEST±2'-7" A.G.L.B/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±7'-4" A.G.L.B/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±10'-3" A.G.L.B/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±10'-9" A.G.L.BOTTOM OF FUTURE BANNER4'-0"4'-0"3D-2±14'-9" A.G.L.C/L OF FUTURE BANNER74 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D 03/14/19 REVISIONE06/07/19 REVISIONDATE SIGNED: 05/12/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/2021F09/16/19 100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G09/27/19 100% CD'S REVISEDH 10/17/19100% CD'S REVISEDI 12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ02/11/20100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020 100% CD'S REVISEDLELEVATIONSA-312NEW SOUTHEAST ELEVATIONEXISTING SOUTHEAST ELEVATION±0'-0" A.G.L.(E) GROUND LEVEL±0'-0" A.G.L.(E) GROUND LEVEL(N) ANTENNA MOUNTED ON (N)EQUIPMENT SHROUD(N) FIBER BOX (BYAT&T WIRELINE UNDERSEPARATE PERMIT)(N) EQUIPMENT SHROUD W/ (2) (N) AT&T2203 RADIO, (1) (N) 2205 RADIOS (1)FUTURE 2205 RADIO & (1) (N) RAYCAPDISCONNECT SWITCH WITHIN SHROUD1D-12-5D-17D-1(N) POLE FOUNDATION(BY AT&T)±19'-11" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) POLE±21'-1" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) LUMINAIRE±25'-5" A.G.L.B/ OF (N) ANTENNA±27'-5" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) ANTENNA±26'-5" A.G.L.C/L OF (N) ANTENNA±25'-5" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) EQUIPMENT SHROUD±22'-0" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) POLE±22'-0" A.G.L.B/ OF (N) EQUIPMENT SHROUD±21'-1" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) LEFT LUMINAIRE±10'-8" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±9'-10" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±4'-7" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE(E) POLE FOUNDATION TO BEREMOVED & REPLACED (BY AT&T)(E) STREET SIGNAGE TO BE BERELOCATED TO (N) POLE(E) STREET SIGNAGE TO BE BERELOCATED TO (N) POLE(E) STREET SIGNAGE TO BE BERELOCATED TO (N) POLE(E) HANDHOLE(E) SIGNAGE RELOCATED ORREPLACED IN-KIND(E) RELOCATEDSTREET SIGNAGE(E) HANDHOLERE-USE (E) LED LUMINAIRE,SEE NOTE 2NOTE:1. ALL NEW EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PAINTEDTO MATCH (E) CONCRETE LIGHT POLE2. RE-USE (E) LED LUMINAIRE. IF NOT LED,REPLACE WITH (N) LED LUMINAIREAPPROVED BY THE CITY.(N) ANTENNA SIGN2D-2(N) NEWPORT BEACH CONCRETESTREETLIGHT (SLC4735) (BY AT&T)TO MATCH EXISTING-S-1(E) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CONCRETESTREETLIGHT (SLC4735) TO BE REMOVED &REPLACED (BY AT&T)(N) U/G FIBER CONDUIT1D-2±9"Ø @ 40" A.G.L±914" Ø @ 14" A.G.L1-1/4" PVC CONDUITMINIMUM, STREETLIGHTING POWER11'-0"FUTURE BANNER & BRACKETLOCATION (BY OTHERS)(E) LANDSCAPE(E) LANDSCAPE±10'-9" A.G.L.BOTTOM OF FUTURE BANNER±18'-9" A.G.L.TOP OF FUTURE BANNER18"MIN18"MIN6'-0"2'-6"±18'-5" A.G.L.TOP OF RF SIGNAGE(E) TREE, TYP.(E) TREE, TYP.±5'-0" A.G.L.T/ OF CONTACT INFO SIGN5D-2(N) EMERGENCYCONTACT SIGN2D-27'-8"7'-8"±10'-8" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±7'-4" A.G.L.B/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±4'-7" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±10'-3" A.G.L.B/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±20'-11" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) LUMINAIRE±20'-11" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) RIGHT LUMINAIRE(N) ADAPTER PLATE-S-2--D-4(E) LED LUMINAIRE TO BE RELOCATED±2'-7" A.G.L.B/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±7'-4" A.G.L.B/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±9'-10" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±10'-3" A.G.L.B/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGE±2'-7" A.G.L.B/ OF (E) STREET SIGNAGEEDGE OF MEDIAN1'-3"8'-11"TO ATT FIBER SOURCEGROUND ROD STAINLESS STEEL#6 SOLID COPPER INSULATED WITHEXOTHERMIC CONNECTION1-1/4" PVC CONDUITTO POWER SOURCE(N) SCE WTR HANDHOLE(317B)(N) WTRHANDHOLE3D-2CONTRACTOR/AT&T SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING:1. EXISTING STREET TREES TO BE PROTECTED.2. IF SIGNS ARE DIRTY OR DAMAGED, THEY ARE TO BE REPLACED BY CONTRACTOR.3. PAINTED CURBS TO BE REPAINT IF DAMAGED OR IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BYTHE PUBLIC WORK INSPECTOR.4. CONTRACTOR TO RETURN (E) STREET LIGHT AND LIGHT ARM TO THE CITY OFNEWPORT BEACH UTILITIES YARD. IF DAMAGED DURING THE REMOVAL,CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PURCHASE AND DELIVER A REPLACEMENT.CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH UTILITIES YARD: 949 W. 16TH STREET NEWPORT BEACHCA 92663. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF THE EXISTING STREET LIGHT POLEAND ARMS IF UNWANTED BY THE CITY FOR ANY REASON.5. ALL WORK TO EXISTING CONDUITS, WIRES, GROUND/PULL BOXES SHALL COMPLYWITH "CITY" STANDARDS DOCUMENTATION AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS &UTILITIES STAFF.6. ALL ABANDON CIRCUIT CONDUITS, WIRES, GROUND/PULL BOXES REMOVE &RESTORATION TO SIDEWALK, NEW.7. DISPOSAL OF EXISTING STREET LIGHT STANDARD IF UNWANTED FOR ANY REASON.EDGE OF MEDIAN±14'-9" A.G.L.C/L OF FUTURE BANNER75 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D 03/14/19 REVISIONE06/07/19 REVISIONF09/16/19 100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G09/27/19 100% CD'S REVISEDH 10/17/19100% CD'S REVISEDI 12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ02/11/20100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020 100% CD'S REVISEDLSITE IMAGEA-41PROPOSED SITE LOCATION LOOKING NORTHEAST76 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D 03/14/19 REVISIONE 06/07/19 REVISIONDATE SIGNED: 05/12/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/2021F09/16/19 100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G09/27/19 100% CD'S REVISEDH 10/17/19100% CD'S REVISEDI 12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ02/11/20100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020 100% CD'S REVISEDLDETAILSD-1DIMENSIONS (WxDxH):7.87"x3.94"x7.87", INCLUDING MOUNTINGBRACKET AND ESTHETIC FRONT COVERERICSSON - MICRO RADIO 2203MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONSVOLUME AND WEIGHT: 4 LITRES AND < 4.5 kg (9.92 lbs)MOUNTING: WALL AND POLE MOUNTINTERFACE SPECIFICATIONS:ANTENNA PORTS:2 x 4.3-10(F)EXTERNAL ALARM:2POWER SUPPLY:-48 VCD OR 100 -250 VACELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS:CPRI:2 x 2.5/5/10 Gbps (EXCHANGEABLE SFPMODULES)OPTICAL INDICATORS:6FIELD GROUND:17.87"7.87"FRONTSIDETOP7.87"3.94"3.94"7.87"BACK7.87"7.87"ERICSSONPOWER OUTPUT:97 WATTS MAXMAX HEAT DISSIPATION:90 WATTSMINIMUM AC FUSE RATING: 6 AMPDIMENSIONS (HxD):MAX WIND SPEED:NO. OF CONNECTORSWEIGHT EXCL MOUNTING BRACKETS:CONNECTOR TYPE &FREQUENCY BAND [MHz]:24.9 x 10 INCHES(643 x 255 mm)150 mph10 X 4.3-10 DIN FEMALE17.2lbs (9 kg)4 X 4.3-10 DIN FEMALE(1695-2360) MHzMECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONSRADOME MATERIAL: ASASHIPPING DIMS (LxWxD): 30"X19"X19" (762x483x483)mm24.9"10.0"1.0"142.5"GALTRONICS GQ2410-06621 PSEUDO OMNI CANISTER ANTENNA4 X 4.3-10 DIN FEMALE(3550-3700) MHz2 X 4.3-10 DIN FEMALE(5150-5950) MHzGROSS SHIPPING WEIGHT: 26 lbs (12kg)FRONTBOTTOMPART NO. GQ2410-06621-11 (GRAY)PART NO. GQ2410-06621-611 (BROWN)PART NO. GQ2410-06621-B11 (CHROME)RAYCAP - RSCAC-6533-P-120-DBOTTOMSIDE8.59"10.28"5.06"M40 GLANDS CAN BE REPLACED BY 11/4 " NPT CONDUIT FITTINGSNPT 1" GLAND CAN BE REPLACED BYCONDUIT FITTING6.25"7.46"FRONT10.45"8.61"MECHANICALSURGE PROTECTION DEVICE (SPD) TYPE TO UL: STRIKESORB 30-ANUMBER OF CIRCUITS PROTECTED: 4SURGE PROTECTIVE DEVICE (SPD) TYPE PER UL 1449 4TH EDITION:TYPE 2 COMPONENT ASSEMBLYSURGE PROTECTION DEVICE (SPD) CLASS TO IEC 61643-11: CLASS IINOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE [UN]: 120 VNOMINAL DISCHARGE CURRENT [IN] PER UL 1449 4TH EDITION: 20 KA 8/20 ΜSMAXIMUM DISCHARGE CURRENT [IMAX] PER IEC 61643-11 60 KA 8/20 ΜSMAXIMUM CONTINUOUS OPERATING VOLTAGE [UC] (MCOV) 150VVOLTAGE PROTECTION LEVEL [UP] PER IEC 61643-11: 700VVOLTAGE PROTECTION RATING (VPR): 20 KA 8/20SUPPRESSION TECHNOLOGY: MOVPROTECTION MODES (DUAL MODE): LINE TO NEUTRAL, NEUTRAL TO GROUNDCONNECTION TERMINAL: COMPRESSION LUG #6 - #14 AWG (13 - 2MM2)TERMINAL BLOCK #10-#26 AWG (6 - 0.14MM2)ENVIRONMENTAL INGRESS PROTECTION (IP) RATING: NEMA 4XOPERATION TEMPERATURE: (°C) -40° C TO +80° CSTORAGE TEMPERATURE: (°C) -70° C TO +80° CENCLOSURE TYPE (OUTDOOR) POLYCARBONATE: UL 94V-0 RATEDENCLOSURE DIMENSION: (L × W × H) 8.58" X 5.06" X 10.08"[217 × 128 × 256 MM]WEIGHT: 2.25 LBS [1.02KG]STRIKESORB MODULES ARE COMPLIANT TO THE FOLLOWING SURGE PROTECTIVE DEVICE (SPD) STANDARDS:UL 1449 4TH EDITION: 2011, IEC 61643-11: 2011, EN 61643-11: 2012, IEEE C62.11: 2005, IEEE C62.41: 2002, IEEE C62.45:2002, NEMA-LS-1 CERTIFICATION UL, VDE, CEELECTRICALAVAILABLE FROM EXCEL SIGN AND DECAL:http://www.weneedsigns.com/home.php?cal+1135 AND CLICK ON AT&TPH: 510-651-0445N01-DC-16 1"X6" NOTICE DECAL"For 1 Foot Distance" VINYL DECAL WITH ADHEDSIVE BACKINGPlace 3 NOTICE sticker at the bottom of the front ofthe radome of each antenna.COVER FEATURES:xSTANDARD LOAD RATING: 20,800 LBS. WHEEL LOADON 10"x20" PLATEx2 BOLT DOWN LOCATIONSxSTAINLESS STEEL BOX INSERTSxPOLYMER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTIONxNON-SKID SURFACE STANDARDx20K TO BE EMBOSSED ON COVERxAPPROXIMATE WEIGHT = 120 LBS.COVER FEATURES:xPOLYMER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTIONxLIGHTWEIGHTxSTACKABLE FOOTxAPPROX. WEIGHT 188 LBS.NON-SKID(STANDARD)2"x8" NAMEPLATERECESS (1 PL)LIFT PINS (2 PL)ANTITHEFT TAMPER RESISTANT BOLT DOWNS (2 PL)3/8"x3" HEX BOLT(2 PL EA END)(OR APPROVED EQUAL)ERICSSON - RADIO 2203GALTRONICS OMNI ANTENNARAYCAP DISCONNECTOMNI ANTENNA DISCLAIMER LABELAT&T MOBILITY FUSED DISCONNECTHANDHOLE(2) ERICSSON 2203MOUNTING - BOTH SIDESRAYCAP POSITION ACLOADCENTER OVP (OPTIONAL)TOPFRONTBOTTOM41.3"Ø12"DIMENSIONS (WxDxH):41.3"xØ12"COMMSCOPE SCC-760236966MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONSWEIGHT: 58 LBS. (26KG)MOUNTING: MOUNTS TO TOP OF POLEERICSSON - RADIO 2205EQUIPMENT SHROUDDIMENSIONS (WxDxH):7.87"x4.84"x7.87", INCLUDING MOUNTINGBRACKET AND ESTHETIC FRONT COVERERICSSON - MICRO RADIO 2205MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONSVOLUME AND WEIGHT: 4 LITRES AND < 4 kg (8.82 lbs)MOUNTING: WALL AND POLE MOUNTINTERFACE SPECIFICATIONS:ANTENNA PORTS: 2 x 4.3-10(F)EXTERNAL ALARM: 2POWER SUPPLY: -48 VCD OR 100 -250 VACELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS:CPRI:2 x 2.5/5/10 Gbps (EXCHANGEABLE SFPMODULES)OPTICAL INDICATORS:6FIELD GROUND:17.87"7.87"FRONTSIDETOP7.87"4.84"4.84"7.87"BACK7.87"7.87"ERICSSONPOWER OUTPUT:97 WATTS MAXMAX HEAT DISSIPATION: 90 WATTSMINIMUM AC FUSE RATING: 6 AMP2-6-SCE UN-METERED FUSED PANEL1106254798382369417577 D-2DETAILSMORATORIUM ROADWAY TRENCHPOLE MOUNTED SIGNS43152SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D 03/14/19 REVISIONE06/07/19 REVISIONDATE SIGNED: 05/12/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/2021F09/16/19 100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G 09/27/19100% CD'S REVISEDH 10/17/19100% CD'S REVISEDI 12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ 02/11/20 100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020100% CD'S REVISEDLWINDBREAKER BRACKET SYSTEMSTREETLIGHT POLESTEEL BANDING KIT W/ BANNERARM TYP.TOP & BOTTOMTO COMPLY WITH CITY BANNERPOLICY L-16, WIND LOAD 90MPH(FUTURE BY OTHERS)BANNERANTENNA SIGNAGEEMERGENCY CONTACT SIGN5"8"Please Reference Site IDPhone: (877) 231-5447E-mail: atttowers@att.comIn case of Emergency ContactAT&T TOWERSSite IDFCC ID5"4"Stay BackRadio-frequency energymay exceed exposure limits.If questions, contact facility owner.Phone: (877) 231-5447E-mail: atttowers@att.comGC TO ADD OWNER INFORMATIONDECAL TO SIGNLUMINAIRE ATTACHMENTBACK VIEWBOTTOM VIEWNOTE:SECURLY TIGHTEN BOLTS TO19.7 FT-LBS BY ALTERMATINGFROM BOLTS TO BOLTS INEQUAL MEASURED AMOUNTS OF25% TORQUE TO AVOIDCROSS-THREADING-D-4ANTI-GRAFFITI COATING ON SIGNANTI-GRAFFITICOATING ON SIGNNEW FOUNDATION78 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D03/14/19 REVISIONE 06/07/19 REVISIONDATE SIGNED: 05/12/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/2021F 09/16/19100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G 09/27/19100% CD'S REVISEDH10/17/19 100% CD'S REVISEDI12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ 02/11/20 100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020100% CD'S REVISEDLCITY OF NEWPORTDETAILSD-3NOT USEDNOT USEDSIDEWALK DETAILTRENCH RESURFACINGNOT USEDROADWAY TRENCHNOT USEDPARKWAY TRENCH2143658779 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D03/14/19 REVISIONE 06/07/19 REVISIONF 09/16/19100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G 09/27/19100% CD'S REVISEDH10/17/19 100% CD'S REVISEDI12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ 02/11/20 100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020100% CD'S REVISEDLLUMINAIRE SPECSD-480 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D03/14/19 REVISIONE 06/07/19 REVISIONF 09/16/19100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G 09/27/19100% CD'S REVISEDH10/17/19 100% CD'S REVISEDI12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ 02/11/20 100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020100% CD'S REVISEDLS-1FOR REFERENCE ONLYPOLE DETAILSPOLE DETAIL181 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D03/14/19 REVISIONE 06/07/19 REVISIONF 09/16/19100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G 09/27/19100% CD'S REVISEDH10/17/19 100% CD'S REVISEDI12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ 02/11/20 100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020100% CD'S REVISEDLS-2FOR REFERENCE ONLYADAPTER PLATEDETAILSADAPTER PLATE DETAIL182 PICO PLUMBING DIAGRAMxxxxxxSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D 03/14/19 REVISIONE 06/07/19 REVISIONDATE SIGNED: 05/12/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/2021F09/16/19 100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G09/27/19 100% CD'S REVISEDH 10/17/19100% CD'S REVISEDI 12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ02/11/20100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020 100% CD'S REVISEDLELECTRICAL DETAILSE-1NOT USEDSINGLE LINE DIAGRAMGROUNDING SCHEMATICNOT USEDSTRIKESORB 120VPROTECTIONDISCONNECT SWITCHCONNECTION FOR POWER INJUMPER GROUNDCONNECTIONS7 AMP CIRCUIT BREAKERSCHASSIS GROUND CONNECTIONDEAD -FRONT FOR LIVECOMPONENTSBREAKER SCHEDULE5D-1ERICSSONERICSSON2D-12D-11D-1ERICSSON4D-14D-1ERICSSON9D-18D-19D-18D-15316425D-11A-21A-35D-11A-21A-383 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D03/14/19 REVISIONE 06/07/19 REVISIONF 09/16/19100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G 09/27/19100% CD'S REVISEDH10/17/19 100% CD'S REVISEDI12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ 02/11/20 100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020100% CD'S REVISEDLSCE-1FOR REFERENCE ONLYSCE FINAL DESIGNSCE FINAL DESIGN.184 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D03/14/19 REVISIONE 06/07/19 REVISIONF 09/16/19100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G 09/27/19100% CD'S REVISEDH10/17/19 100% CD'S REVISEDI12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ 02/11/20 100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020100% CD'S REVISEDLSCE-2FOR REFERENCE ONLYSCE FINAL DESIGN1SCE FINAL DESIGN.85 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D03/14/19 REVISIONE 06/07/19 REVISIONF 09/16/19100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G 09/27/19100% CD'S REVISEDH10/17/19 100% CD'S REVISEDI12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ 02/11/20 100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020100% CD'S REVISEDLSCE-3FOR REFERENCE ONLYSCE FINAL DESIGN1SCE FINAL DESIGN.86 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D03/14/19 REVISIONE 06/07/19 REVISIONF 09/16/19100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G 09/27/19100% CD'S REVISEDH10/17/19 100% CD'S REVISEDI12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ 02/11/20 100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020100% CD'S REVISEDLSCE-3FOR REFERENCE ONLYSCE FINAL DESIGN1SCE FINAL DESIGN87 TEMP. NO PARKING250'-0"100'90'-0" SHIFTING TAPER250'250'100'-0"TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANTCP-1SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D03/14/19 REVISIONE 06/07/19 REVISIONDATE SIGNED: 05/12/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/2021F 09/16/19100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G 09/27/19100% CD'S REVISEDH10/17/19 100% CD'S REVISEDI12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ 02/11/20 100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020100% CD'S REVISEDLTRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN1NENESESWWNWSWSENWNOTES:1. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MANUALON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (2012 CALIFORNIA MUTCD) AND THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONSFOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION.2. THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE HAS THE AUTHORITY TO INITIATE FIELD CHANGESTO ASSURE PUBLIC SAFETY.3. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED FROM VIEW WHEN NOT IN USE.4. WORK HOURS SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE PERIOD BETWEEN 7:00 A.M. AND 5:00 P.M., MONDAYTHROUGH FRIDAY, UNLESS APPROVED OTHERWISE. WHEN NIGHT WORK IS REQUIRED, WORK HOURSSHALL BE 9:00 P.M. TO 5:00 A.M. SUNDAY THROUGH FRIDAY.5. TRENCHES MUST BE BACK FILLED OR PLATED DURING NON-WORKING HOURS.6. PEDESTRIAN CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.7. TEMPORARY "NO PARKING SIGNS" SHALL BE POSTED 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK IN ALLPARKING ZONES.8. ACCESS TO DRIVEWAYS WILL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES UNLESS OTHER ARRANGEMENTS ARE MADE.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE WITHIN 72 HOURS ALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOOP DETECTORS DAMAGEDDURING CONSTRUCTION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE WITHIN 24 HOURS, ALL STRIPING, REMOVED OR DAMAGED BYCONSTRUCTION WORK. (STRIPING MAY BE REPLACED TEMPORARILY WITH TAPE.)11. ALL WORKERS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN ORANGE VEST (OR A REFLECTIVE VEST AT NIGHT). ALLFLAGGERS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A HARD HAT, C28 "STOP/SLOW" PADDLE AND SHALL BE TRAINED INTHE PROPER FUNDAMENTALS OF FLAGGING TRAFFIC.12. ANY WORK THAT DISTURBS NORMAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THECITY 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL TRAFFIC DEVICES 24 HOURS PER DAY AND 7 DAYS PER WEEK.14. A MINIMUM OF 10' TRAVEL LANES MUST BE MAINTAINED UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED THE CITY.15. ALL NIGHT WORK WILL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY. LANE CLOSURES, ROAD DETOURS,AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH OVERNIGHT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WILLREQUIRE WARNING SIGNS BE PLACED AT LEAST ONE WEEK IN ADVANCE OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION.16. A SOLAR POWERED FLASHING ARROW BOARD SHALL BE REQUIRED ON ALL ARTERIAL STREET LANECLOSURES.17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY TRANSIT AUTHORITY IN ADVANCE AND PROVIDE TEMPORARYRELOCATED BUS STOPS.18. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN IN INCLUDED THAT COMPLIES WITH 2016 WATCHBOOK REQUIREMENTS.PHASE 1CITY NOTE1. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND NEW TCP WILLBE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED AS PART OF THE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.88 TEMP. NO PARKING250'100'90'-0" SHIFTING TAPER50'-0"100'100'100'BEPREPAREDTOSTOPONE LANEROADAHEADTEMP. NO PARKINGTEMP. NO PARKINGTEMP. NO PARKINGTEMP. NO PARKING90'-0" BIKE TAPER250'14'100'-0"30' MAX100'-0"100'-0"TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANTCP-2SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMDGMREV DATE DESCRIPTIONSITE ID: HBNPB_042ACITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4735LOCATED IN THE CENTERMEDIAN OF AVOCADO AVENUE,APPROX. 50' S OF THE NECORNER OF KEWAMEE DRIVEAND AVOCADO AVENUECORONA DEL MAR, CA 92665330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602D 03/14/19 REVISIONE06/07/19 REVISIONDATE SIGNED: 05/12/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/2021F09/16/19 100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780G 09/27/19100% CD'S REVISEDH 10/17/19100% CD'S REVISEDI 12/24/19 REVISED PER SCE POWERJ 02/11/20 100% CD'S REVISED04/01/2020 SCE FINAL POWERK05/12/2020100% CD'S REVISEDLTRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN1NENESESWWNWSWSENWPHASE 2CITY NOTE1. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND NEW TCP WILLBE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED AS PART OF THE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.89 August 13, 2020, Zoning Administrator Agenda Comments Comments submitted by: Jim Mosher ( jimmosher@yahoo.com ), 2210 Private Road, Newport Beach 92660 (949-548-6229) Item 3. AT&T Small Cell SLC4735 Minor Use Permit No. UP2019-027 and Coastal Development Permit No. CD2020-101 (PA2019-108) While I appreciate that the Zoning Administrator is being asked to make the additional findings required to grant a coastal development permit, it is disappointing that neither the staff report nor proposed resolution disclose the previous hearing history of this application or any comments received then, let alone respond to them. The minor use permit portion of this application was previously scheduled for hearing as Item 3 on June 11, 2020, at which time it was continued to June 25, and on June 25 it was taken off calendar. At the June 11 hearing, written public comments were received suggesting the roof of the office building at the corner of Avocado and PCH (the crenulated building above the “Site” arrow in the “Vicinity Map” on handwritten page 69 of the current staff report) as a better alternative location than any of those considered in the report. That location could provide a higher preference (Class 1 or 2) facility further removed from a residential district – and possibly provide greater coverage given its greater height. To repeat that earlier comment, the staff report expresses concern with blockage of the RF signal by the Sandcastle condominium complex structures to the immediate north of the proposed site were the facility to be mounted on a roof in that complex (see Finding H.5 on handwritten page 19). That would seem to be a problem for the proposed location, as well, since the facility appears lower in height than parts of the condominium. The high location on the office tower roof would appear to provide a clearer line of sight, over the condominium, in the directions of interest where coverage is desired per the anticipated coverage map on handwritten page 43. That map predicts the proposed site will provide limited coverage to the north, presumably due to blockage by the condo structures – as well as blockage by other buildings causing the signal to propagate primarily along Avocado Avenue and Kewamee Drive and to not penetrate into the residential areas. Hence, the proposed site seems to contribute more to distracted driving than to enhanced residential service. The alternative office roof site, not considered in the staff report, would seem better in all respects, with its higher preference class, greater distance from residences and better lines of sight to them making up for its being farther from what the applicant claims is the optimal location. As to the proposed resolution, please consider these comments and corrections: Handwritten page 12, Section 1.2: “The Applicant proposes the installation of a small cell wireless facility on a City-owned streetlight pole. Project implementation will be fully contained within the public right-of-way on Bayside Drive Avocado Avenue and includes the following: …” Handwritten page 12, Section 1.3: Since Section 1.4 explains Chapter 21.49 requires a coastal development permit, it would seem appropriate for Section 1.3 to explain Chapter 20.49 requires a minor use permit. Handwritten page 13, end of Section 2.1: “…; and the conversion of existing small structures from one (1) use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure.” Zoning Administrator - August 13, 2020 Item No. 3a Additional Materials Received AT&T Small Cell SLC4735 (PA2019-108) August 13, 2020, Zoning Administrator agenda Item 3 comments - Jim Mosher Page 2 of 3 [The CEQA Guidelines do not contain the “(1)” and it goes beyond silly to insert it. In this case, it is even wrong: the word “one” is not being used here to signify a number but rather as an adjective equivalent to “a particular” or “an existing.”] Handwritten page 13, start of Section 2.3: “The exceptions to the Class 3 use of a categorical exemption under Section 15300.2 are not applicable.” [Most of the exceptions listed would apply equally to the preceding claim of a Class 2 exemption.] Handwritten page 13, Section 3: The format of the resolution leaves unclear if it actually addresses all the specific findings and considerations required for a telecom facility by Chapters 20.49 and 21.49, including the many directions to the review authority found in Sections 20.49.050/ 21.49.050. In particular, I am unable to find where Subsection 20.49.050.B/21.49.050.B is addressed. Handwritten page 14, Section 3.A.2: “… employing stealth elements like colorization (painting to match the streetlight pole), …” [This use of the word “stealth” does not comport with its definition in NBMC Chapters 20.49/21.49, which specifically excludes from the term attempts to minimize the intrusiveness of something that is still clearly a wireless facility.] Handwritten page 14, Section 3.A.3: “Adverse impact to circulation, aesthetics, sounds, or odor are not anticipated from project implementation.” [Has it been verified that the below-grade support equipment contains no moving parts, such as cooling fans? Or hazardous materials such as stand- by batteries?] Handwritten page 14, Section 3.B.2, sentence 2: “small Small cell equipment in the ROW assigns the project a Class 3 specification …” Handwritten page 16, Section 3.C.1, sentence 2: “The Applicant proposes to remove and replace SLC4735 with a new streetlight in the same location while maintaining the existing luminaire heights of 21 feet, 1 inch for the left luminaire sensor and 20 feet, 11 inches for the right luminaire sensor.” [“Left” and “right” have no meaning without stating the direction from which the pole is viewed. Based on page 72, I am guessing the lower sensor is the one on southeast and the higher one is on the northwest. Or one could say “looking north on Avocado.”] Handwritten page 16, Section 3.C.6: “The proposed facility will be unmanned, will have no impact on the circulation system, and, as conditioned, will not generate noise, odor, smoke, or any other adverse impacts to adjacent land uses.” [The only condition I can find explicitly related to this is No. 30, which deals with construction noise, not day-to-day operation. Or does this statement rely on Conditions No. 2, 3 and 4 requiring compliance with all laws?] Handwritten page 18, Section 3.F.4: “The proposed facility and below-grade accessory equipment meets the City’s design parameters approved by the City’s Master License Agreement, which emphasizes stealth techniques and best practices to not be materially detrimental to the surrounding area.” [Again, this installation is not “stealth” in the sense that term is used in the NBMC.] Handwritten page 19, Section 3.H.2: “Alternative Site #1 … The trees are taller than the streetlight and most of the foliage of these trees grows near the top of the tree, above the height of the streetlight, while the trunk is somewhat barren. Furthermore, the trees are located over 25 feet away from the streetlight and are not immediately adjacent.” [I agree with the priority being given to Zoning Administrator - August 13, 2020 Item No. 3a Additional Materials Received AT&T Small Cell SLC4735 (PA2019-108) August 13, 2020, Zoning Administrator agenda Item 3 comments - Jim Mosher Page 3 of 3 screening, but while making an installation there more visually intrusive, the conditions cited here and at Alternative Site #2 would seem to provide better propagation.] Handwritten pages 19-20, Section 3.I: I see nothing in the NBMC restricting the consideration of alternatives to those proposed by the applicant. Why is the higher priority alternative suggested by the public at the June 10 hearing (see my introductory comment, above) not being considered? Handwritten page 20, Section 3.J.3: “The project complies with Section 21.30.100 (Scenic and Visual Quality Protection) of the NBMC.” [As previously noted, this does not address the more stringent “Public View Protection” requirements for wireless facilities imposed by NBMC Subsections 20.49.050.B and 21.49.050.B. In particular, the impact analysis is not supposed to be confined to the public viewpoints identified in the General Plan or Coastal Land Use Plan. It is supposed to consider any comparable views that might be impacted. In other words, the Zoning Administrator is required to consider if this installation impacts any public viewshed to the bay, ocean or beach. It is not at all clear from the resolution that such an analysis has been conducted.] Handwritten page 21, Section 4: This section contains two subsections “1”. The second of those is garbled and incomplete. Surely the Zoning Administrator’s granting of the MUP can be appealed, but that would not be done using Title 21 as is stated. Similarly, it is not clear if the resolution allows the MUP and the CDP to be appealed separately. If it does not, that would defeat the Council’s intent in recently adjusting the City’s fee schedule to allow the Zoning Administrator’s CDP decisions to be appealed to the Planning Commission at no charge. Handwritten page 23, condition 11: “Prior to building permit final, a Height Certification Inspection shall be required prior to final of building permits. The small cell facility and base streetlight pole approved by this permit shall not exceed a total of 27 feet, 5 inches (27’ 5”) in height from existing grade (maximum elevation height of 117.2 feet above grade using the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 [NAVD88]).” [This assumes the existing grade is 89.8 feet, which I have not attempted to verify.] Zoning Administrator - August 13, 2020 Item No. 3a Additional Materials Received AT&T Small Cell SLC4735 (PA2019-108)