Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.0_AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal_PA2019-115 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 22, 2020 Agenda Item No. 5 SUBJECT: AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) ▪ Coastal Development Permit No. CD2020-118 SITE LOCATION: Public right-of-way, city streetlight number SLC4653, on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 900 feet northwest of El Paseo Drive APPLICANT: New Cingular Wireless, LLC OWNER: City of Newport Beach PLANNER: Joselyn Perez, Assistant Planner 949-644-3312, jperez@newportbeachca.gov PROJECT SUMMARY An appeal of the Zoning Administrator’s August 27, 2020, decision to approve a coastal development permit (CDP) to allow the installation of telecommunications equipment for a small cell wireless facility on a City-owned streetlight pole. Project implementation will be fully contained within the public right -of-way on Bayside Drive and includes the following: (1) removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight; (2) installation of a small cell wireless facility that consists of four remote radio units, a raycap disconnect, and an omni-directional antenna within a 12-inch diameter equipment shroud. The equipment would be fixed to the top of the replaced streetlight pole for a maximum height of 27 feet, 5 inches; and (3) establishment of new below-grade support equipment adjacent to the streetlight. RECOMMENDATION 1) Conduct a de novo public hearing; 2) Find this project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15302 and 15303 under Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction) and Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), respectively, of the State CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment and the exceptions to the Class 3 exemption under Section 15300.2 do not apply; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. PC2020-035 affirming the decision of the Zoning Administrator and approving Coastal Development Permit CD2020-118 with the attached Findings and Conditions (Attachment PC 1). 1 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE2 AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission, October 22, 2020 Page 2 VICINITY MAP COASTAL LAND USE PLAN COASTAL ZONING LOCATION COASTAL LAND USE COASTAL ZONING CURRENT USE ON-SITE N/A N/A Public right-of-way NORTH RSD-A (Single-Unit Residential Detached) – (0.0 – 5.9 DU/AC) R-1 (Single-Unit Residential) B (Bluff Development) Single-family residences SOUTH RM-C (Multiple Residential) – (10.0 – 19.9 DU/AC) RM (Multiple Residential) Residential condominiums EAST RSD-A R-1 B Single-family residences WEST RM-C RM Residential condominiums Streetlight SLC4356 3 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE4 AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission, October 22, 2020 Page 3 INTRODUCTION Background Over the last several decades, with the invention of new technologies like smartphones, tablets, and smartwatches, connectivity for wireless devices drove telecommunications companies to deploy new equipment to allow for the transmission of more data. Wireless data demand continues to grow, outpacing the capacity of the existing telecommunications infrastructure. Small cell technology, like the proposed, is being deployed across the country as a new solution to resolve soaring data demand and to make coverage more reliable. In contrast to traditional macro wireless sites (i.e., cell towers), small cells are able to deliver a stronger signal over a small radius by the means of minimal equipment on existing infrastructure. The result is limited visual intrusion and enhanced wireless network capacity, which residents, businesses, and visitors demand. The City of Newport Beach’s (City) regulatory review of wireless telecom siting is limited by three federal laws: The Communications Act of 1934, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Telecommunications Act) and a provision of the Middle -Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Spectrum Act). Together, these laws aim to facilitate and stimulate wireless infrastructure development and restrict certain aspects of local authority in review and permitting of wireless telecommunications facilities. On January 14, 2019, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Declaratory Ruling and Order FCC 18 -133 (Order) became effective. This directive further removed barriers to wireless infrastructure deployment and established accelerated timelines for processing wireless facility applications at the local level. It also limited the City’s rights as a property owner, restricting the type and amount of fees the City can collect fo r private use of public property. On February 12, 2019, the City Council authorized execution of a Master License Agreement (MLA) (Contract C-8584-1) with New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (AT&T). The Master License authorized non-exclusive use of City-owned streetlights to install telecommunications equipment for small cell facilities. The MLA approved conceptual designs, fee and rent assessment. AT&T is responsible for all resultant construction, installation, maintenance, and repair of the small cell faci lities, including all related costs and expenses. Further, AT&T is responsible for complying with all laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations that may be required for their projects. As the local regulatory agency, the City assesses wireless service facilities under local permitting protocol and ensures sites adhere to responsible regulatory practices, including safety, accessibility, environmental impact, land use, and aesthetics. However, Section 332(c)(7)(B)(iv) of U.S. Code Title 47 (Telecommunications) reads, “no state or local government may regulate wireless telecommunication facilities on the basis of the perceived health effects of radio frequency (RF) emissions to the extent that the proposed 5 AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission, October 22, 2020 Page 4 facilities comply with FCC regulations concerning emissions.” Submitted RF materials from the applicant demonstrate the proposal would conform with FCC Rules and Regulations. Condition of Approval No. 25 requires the applicant to comply with all applicable provisions of U.S. Code Title 47 (Telecommunications) rules and regulations, including those related to radio frequency emissions. Under the new FCC Order, wireless providers are not required to demonstrate a significant coverage gap, a qualification previously required by local jurisdictions in order to support an application. Pursuant to the Order, the City cannot “materially [inhibit] the introduction of new services or the improvement of existing services.” Moreover, pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II) of U.S. Code Title 47 (Telecommunications), the City may “not regulate the placement, construction or modification of wireless service facilities in a manner that prohibits the provision of personal wireless services.” Although not required, the applicant produced a coverage m ap for the project (Attachment PC 7). This map indicates the proposed facility would boost the capacity and coverage in the vicinity. Project Setting The proposed project is located on City Streetlight SLC4653. The streetlight is located within a vegetated parkway on the north side of Bayside Drive and at the toe of a steep slope. The streetlight is located approximately 900 feet northwest of the intersection of Bayside Drive and El Paseo Drive. As the streetlight is located within the public right-of- way, the site is not designated by the General Plan Land Use Element or the Coastal Land Use Plan and, therefore, is not located within any zoning district. All abutting land uses are residential and vary in density from single-unit residential abutting the site to multiple-unit residential across the street. Project Description The applicant seeks a CDP to allow the installation of telecommunications equipment for a small cell wireless facility on the City-owned streetlight pole. Project implementation will be fully contained within the public right -of-way on Bayside Drive and includes the following: (1) removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight; (2) installation of a small cell wireless facility that consists of four remote radio units, a raycap disconnect, and an omni-directional antenna within a 12-inch diameter equipment shroud. This equipment would be fixed to the top of the replaced streetlight pole for a maximum height of 27 feet, 5 inches; and (3) establishment of new below-grade support equipment adjacent to the streetlight. The proposed facility is a stealth facility as defined under Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC) Section 21.49.030(M). The project is designed to be as visually inconspicuous as possible with all equipment and antennas screened from view. The proposed location was selected by the applicant because the necessary utilities are readily available, is feasible from a signal propagation perspective, is free of obstructions (such as trees), has a good line of site to meet coverage objectives, and is as outside of any public view corridors. 6 AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission, October 22, 2020 Page 5 Figure 1, Existing rendering (top) with proposed rendering (bottom) showing the replaced streetlight pole, antenna, equipment shroud, and below-grade equipment handholes. Existing Proposed 7 AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission, October 22, 2020 Page 6 Construction of the proposed project will take approximately 30 days. Existing underground fiber connections will be utilized whenever possible and directional boring will be employed when appropriate to minimize open trenching and disturbance. Maintenance of the unmanned facility is not expected to create any congestion and maintenance activity is expected to be minimal. The telecom operator will be responsible for maintenance of the telecom facility including, but not limited to, any missing, discolored or damaged screening, all graffiti will be removed promptly, and the facility kept clean and free of litter. Monitoring is typically done remotely and, if necessary, a site visit to change any radio equipment will be coordinated with the City through the appropriate process. Project Background and Appeal Pursuant to Section 20.49.060 (Permit Review Procedures), a minor use permit is also required for a small cell wireless facility installation within the public right-of-way. A public hearing was held on April 16, 2020. After considering all evidence, both written and oral, the Zoning Administrator adopted Resolution No. ZA2020-031 approving Minor Use Permit UP2019-034 for the project. Although a call for review was attempted by the Planning Commission, said call for review occurred after the designated appeal period had expired in accordance with Section 20.64.030 (Filing and Processing of Appeals and Calls for Review) of the NBMC and UP2019-034 became effective. The project is located within the Coastal Zone. Subsection 21.49.020(B) (Permit and Agreement Required) of the NBMC requires a CDP for a wireless telecommunication facility unless the facility is exempt pursuant to Section 21.49.020(C) (Exempt Facilities). After the initial request came before the Zoning Administrator, staff determined the project does not meet any of the prescribed exemptions and a coastal development permit is required. As such, the applicant revised the request to include the CDP. On August 27, 2020, the Zoning Administrator conducted a public hearing and approved the applicant’s request for the CDP. The approved minutes from this hearing are attached as Attachment PC 4. During the meeting, one member of the public spoke in opposition to the project. Mr. Jim Mosher expressed concern that the adjacent hillside is a coastal bluff, which is a natural resource as defined in the Coastal Land Use Plan, and this project would impact views of the resource. He stated his belief that Alternative Site No. 4 is a superior option, as the adjacent bluff is already disturbed and blighted with a solar panel structure. On September 9, 2020, Mr. Mosher filed an appeal of the Zoning Administrator’s decision citing an inadequate consideration of alternative locations (Attachment PC 2). Pursuant to NBMC Section 21.64.030(C)(3) (Conduct of Hearing), a public hearing on a call for review is conducted “de novo,” meaning that it is a new hearing. The prior decision of the Zoning Administrator to approve Coastal Development Permit CD2020-118 has no force or effect. The Planning Commission is not bound by the Zoning Administrator’s prior decision. 8 AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission, October 22, 2020 Page 7 Analysis Coastal Land Use Plan and Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan The project site is located within the Public Right of Way and does not have a Coastal Land Use General Plan Land Use Designation or a Coastal Zoning district. The project is regulated by Council Policy L-23 (Siting of Wireless Telecommunications Equipment on City-Owned Property) and NBMC Chapter 21.49 (Wireless Telecommunication Facilities). NBMC Chapter 21.49 outlines State - and Federal-compliant telecommunication facility development standards and details permit procedures based on facility “Class.” The Class of a wireless facility is characterized by its installation type and location. NBMC Subsection 21.49.040(A) (Preferred Locations) prioritizes telecom facilities from most preferred (1) to least preferred (4) as follows: (1) collocation of a new facility at an existing facility; (2) Class 1 Stealth/Screened); (3) Class 2 (Visible Antennas), Class 3 (Public Right-of-Way); and (4) Class 4 (Freestanding Structure). Small cell facilities located on City-owned streetlights in the ROW is a Class 3 specification (Public Right-of-Way Installations). Although lower on the listing of priority facilities, the proposed facility consists of one (1) small cell facility that is designed to not visually dominate the surrounding area and instead to blend into the surroundings. The abutting residential zones do not allow wireless telecommunications facilities and the applicant indicates they were not left with any viable options to meet their business objectives to provide enhanced coverage and capacity in this challenging area. While a more preferred Class 1 (Stealth/Screened) wireless facility (PA2018-151) was approved approximately 800 feet southeast on the Bahia Corinthian Yacht Club building at 1601 Bayside Drive, that project was for a larger macro site, which was ultimately never constructed due to technical challenges. NBMC Section 21.49.050 (General Development and Design Standards) requires projects to be visually compatible with surrounding structures. All telecommunications equipment on top of the streetlight pole would be concealed within a painted-to-match 12- inch diameter shroud. The proposed small cell facility would rely on “likeness” with the streetlight pole through style, color, and material to help disguise its presence. Electrical and wiring components of the telecommunications equipment are designed to be fully contained within the new streetlight pole. The overall height of 27 feet, 5 inches from existing finish grade to the top of the proposed facility complies with the 35-foot maximum height allowed. Equipment not contained within the shroud on the streetlight pole woul d be out of sight, located below grade in the adjacent ROW. Existing residential properties contiguous to the site are in the R -1 (Single-Unit Residential) Zoning District. R-1-zoned sites allow for principal dwellings up to 29 feet in height and for sloped roof elements with a minimum 3:12 pitch. The streetlight is separated from the R-1 residences by a steep landscaped downslope and the height of the existing streetlight SLC4653 sits well below the grade of the immediately adjacent residences. Given the significant grade differential and the lower setting of the streetlight, 9 AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission, October 22, 2020 Page 8 the general visibility of the proposed small cell facility is lessened for the existing development, which helps to ensure visual compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood and its residential character. The project was reviewed for consistency with the Public View Protection regulations of Section 21.49.050(B) (Public View Protection) of the NBMC. This section requires that all telecom projects comply with 21.30.100 (Scenic and Visual Quality Protection). In general, telecom facilities should be located outside of any public viewshed to or along the ocean, bay, beach or coastal bluffs. The subject location is not on a coastal bluff or in a canyon, it is not adjacent to or within the viewshed of a public viewpoint, coastal view road, public park or beach, or public accessway as identified on the Coastal Land Use Plan Map 4-3 (Coastal Views), and the site does not contain significant natural landforms or vegetation. The project scope involves the removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight in the same location with the same luminaire height. The project design and location avoid disturbing a coastal bluff. While the facility will be visible, the project has been designed to blend with its surroundings and minimize any visual impact. The replacement streetlight is consistent with the size, shape, style, and design of the existi ng pole. No above ground mounted equipment is proposed , and the support equipment is proposed to be placed underground. All transmission equipment, including remote radio units and the raycap disconnect switch, are fully concealed within a screening shroud . Photographic visual simulations of the facility, depicting the existing and proposed conditions, have been prepared by the applicant and are included as Attachment PC 8. Bayside Drive is a well-traveled, two-lane, street. It also features bike lanes in both directions and street parking on the northbound side. It is developed with typical street infrastructure including streetlights, utility cabinets, and storm drains. The project is visually compatible with the existing streetscape environment. The proposed location minimizes alternation to natural topography in order to preserve the bluff that runs along Bayside Drive. There is no pedestrian right-of-way or access on the north side of Bayside Drive and, as such, the Project will not affect the public’s ability to gain access to, use, and/or view the coast and nearby recreational facilities. Alternative Sites Considered After a thorough review of the area, the applicant concluded that an NBMC Subsection 21.49.040(A) (Preferred Locations) preferred location (i.e. collocation or a Class 1 or 2 facility), would not be technically feasible from an RF or construction perspective. The analysis explained that small cell facilities are low powered and must be located at the precise location selected to serve the network traffic demands of the area. Further, this type of service cannot be accomplished with a traditional macro collocation or building mounted site in the area. 10 AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission, October 22, 2020 Page 9 The applicant and staff also evaluated four nearby streetlights as possible alternate locations for this small cell facility. Each location is depicted below in Figure 2. Figure 2, On this aerial map, AT&T’s proposed small cell location is designated by a red marker and the alternative sites are identified by yellow markers. (The balance of this page intentionally left blank.) ALTERNATIVE SITE NO. 4 ALTERNATIVE SITE NO. 3 ALTERNATIVE SITE NO. 2 ALTERNATIVE SITE NO. 1 PROPOSED SITE 11 AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission, October 22, 2020 Page 10 Alternative Site No. 1 at City Streetlight SLC4651 (pictured right) is located on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 498 feet northwest of El Paseo Drive and approximately 200 feet southeast of the proposed streetlight. This location is within the same parkway as the proposed location. The streetlight is bounded on three sides by a low retaining wall. The coastal bluff which runs the length of Bayside Drive is fully exposed at this location and is visible to pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists. Alternative Site No. 1 would likely have greater construction impacts than the proposed location as the site would require some additional grading in order to accommodate relocation of the low retaining walls. This relocation of the retaining walls is required to allow for the replacement of the streetlight and installation of associated utility pull boxes. Additionally, the location is not ideal from the applicant’s coverage and capacity considerations. It is notable that the additional grading into the hillside at Alternative Site No. 1 is inconsistent with the General Plan Natural Resources Goal NR 23 and the Local Coastal Program guidance that development should respect natural landforms (including coastal bluffs). Specifically, this alternative site would be inconsistent with General Plan natural Resources Element Policy NR 23.1 (Maintenance of Natural Topography). Alternative Site No. 2 at City Streetlight SLC4652 (pictured right) is located on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 720 feet northwest of El Paseo Drive, and approximately 400 feet southeast of the proposed streetlight. Alternative Site No. 2 sits in front of the coastal bluff; although the vegetation here is denser than Alternative Site No. 1 and the view of the bluff is obscured. The streetlight is bounded by a low retaining wall on three sides. Alternative Site No. 2 would likely have greater construction impacts as the site would require more grading and disturbance to accommodate the relocation of the low retaining walls, which is required to allow for the replacement of the streetlight and installation of associated pull boxes. While this site is located closer to the proposed location, it is still not ideal from the applicant’s coverage and capacity improvement considerations. 12 AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission, October 22, 2020 Page 11 Alternative Site No. 3 at City Streetlight SLC4654 (pictured right) is located on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 1100 feet northwest of El Paseo Drive, and approximately 200 feet northwest of the proposed streetlight. The site is located within the vegetated parkway and is bounded by a low retaining wall. The slope abutting this alternative site is steep and the vegetation is dense. Alternative Site No. 3 would likely have greater construction impacts than the proposed location, as the hillside would require more grading in order to accommodate relocation of the retaining wall, which allows for the replacement of the streetlight and installation of associated pull boxes. Again, this site is also not ideal from the applicant’s intent to improve network coverage and capacity. Alternative Site No. 4 at City Streetlight SLC4655 is located on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 1300 feet northwest of El Paseo Drive, and approximately 400 feet northwest of the proposed project location. The hillside abutting Alternative Site No. 4 is disturbed due to a previous installation of solar panels (pictured right) and the site lacks views of the natural coastal bluff. This alternative location does not adequately meet the applicant’s business objectives for coverage. While the lack of bluff views and lack of low retaining walls (common to the previously described alternative sites) make Alternative Site No. 4 a viable alternative, Alternative Site No. 4 is uniquely situated at a bend in the Bayside Drive roadway. As seen in Figure 2, Alternative Sites No. 1 through 3 are in line with one another. Alternative Site No. 4 is to the left of this line and is more visible to motorists or bicyclists as they approach the location from the South. Furthermore, the abutting hillside does not provide the dense vegetation the proposed location provides that could provide some screening. While the developed nature of the bluff could a measure of screening that might allow the facility to blend in, the increased visibility of the site to motorists was a more compelling reason to reject this alternative location. 13 AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission, October 22, 2020 Page 12 Summary The appeal filed by Mr. Jim Mosher focuses on an alleged lack of sufficient consideration of alternative locations or collocation with existing telecoms in the vicinity. The existing streetlight serves as a part of the City’s inventory and the replacement streetlight pole design is consistent with the size, shape, style, and des ign of that existing, including the attached light arm and luminaire. Maintaining the same luminaire height as the existing streetlight pole will help to ensure visual continuity on the streetscape corridor with respect to light standard design. The only noticeable difference will be the added antenna screening shroud extending above the pole. All proposed transmission equipment and antennas will be fully concealed within a screening shroud. The project site is located at the bottom of a steep, landscaped hillside. The proposed facility is also below the line of sight from the homes above so views are not significantly affected. The hillside serves as a visual backdrop and the landscaping serves to soften the facility’s appearance to blend the facility consistent with NBMC Chapter 21.49. Furthermore, the project site allows surrounding natural landforms to remain undisturbed. While alternative sites were considered for the project, the proposed location was ultimately found to best meet the project objectives and City regulations and there were no opportunities for colocation within the area. Staff believes all the project meets all findings required under Title 21 (Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan) of the NBMC. As such, staff recommends approval of the project thereby upholding the Zoning Administrator’s August 27, 2020, decision. Alternatives If the Planning Commission believes that there are insufficient facts to support the findings for approval, the Planning Commission may deny the application and provide facts in support of denial to be included in a resolution for denial. Should the Commission believe an alternative site is more suitable for the proposed facility, then the Commission must deny the application without prejudice to allow the applicant to pursue an identified alternative location. An alternative location cannot be approved at this meeting and a new application will need to be submitted in accordance with NBMC Sections 20.54.080 and 21.54.080. Environmental Review This project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15302 and 15303 under Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction) and Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), respectively, of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be 14 AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission, October 22, 2020 Page 13 located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. In this case, the proposal includes the removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight pole to support a small telecommunications wireless facility, including below- grade accessory equipment. The exceptions to the Class 3 categorical exemptions under Section 15300.2 are not present for the proposed location and alternative locations Nos. 3 and 4. These locations do not impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern, does not result in cumulative impacts, does not have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances, does not damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway, is not a hazardous waste site, and is not identified as a historical resource . The presence of the publicly visible rock outcroppings that would be altered in Alternative locations Nos. 1 and 2 are exceptions to finding them exempt from environmental review. Public Notice Notice of this hearing was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to all owners and residential occupants of property within 300 feet of the boundaries of the site (excluding intervening rights-of-way and waterways) including the applicant and posted on the subject property at least 10 days before the scheduled meeting, consistent with the provisions of the NBMC. At the time the application was submitted, a Notice of Filing was posted to the site by the Applicant in accordance with Title 21 requirements. Additionally, the item appeared on the agenda for this meeting, which was posted at City Hall and on the Ci ty website. Prepared by: Submitted by: BMZ/jp ATTACHMENTS PC 1 Draft Resolution for Approval PC 2 Appeal Form 15 AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission, October 22, 2020 Page 14 PC 3 Adopted Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-058 PC 4 Minutes of Zoning Administrator Meeting of August 27, 2020 PC 5 Applicant’s Project Description and Justification PC 6 Alternative Locations Studied and Rejected PC 7 Coverage Maps PC 8 Photographic Simulations and Project Plans 01/12/18 16 Attachment No. PC 1 Draft Resolution for Approval 17 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE18 05-14-19 RESOLUTION NO. PC2020-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. CD2020-118 FOR A SMALL CELL FACILITY LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT- OF-WAY ON CITY STREETLIGHT NUMBER SLC4653, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 900 FEET NORTH OF EL PASEO DRIVE (PA2019-115) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS. 1. An application was filed by New Cingular Wireless, LLC (“Applicant”), with respect to City of Newport Beach (“City”) Streetlight Number 4653 (“SLC4653”), located within the public right-of-way, on the north side of Bayside Drive approximately 900 feet northwest of El Paseo Drive, requesting approval of a coastal development permit (“CDP”). 2. The Applicant proposes the installation of a small cell wireless facility on a City -owned streetlight pole. Project implementation will be fully contained within the public right -of- way on Bayside Drive and includes: removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight; installation of a small cell wireless facility that consists of four (4) remote radio units, a raycap disconnect, and an omni-directional antenna within a 12-inch diameter equipment shroud, with the equipment being fixed to the top of the replaced streetlight pole for a maximum height of 27 feet, 5 inches; and establishment of new below-grade support equipment adjacent to the streetlight (“Project”). . 3. Since SLC4653 is located within the public right-of-way, the proposal is regulated by Council Policy L-23 (Siting of Wireless Telecommunications Equipment on City-Owned Property), as well as Chapter 20.49 (Wireless Telecommunication Facilities) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code (“NBMC”). Pursuant to Section 20.49.060 (Permit Review Procedures) of the NBMC, a minor use permit is required for this type of installation. 4. The City’s regulatory review of wireless telecom siting is limited by three federal laws: (1) the Communications Act of 1934; (2) Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Telecommunications Act); and (3) the Middle-Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Spectrum Act), which aim to facilitate wireless infrastructure development and restrict certain aspects of local authority in review and permitting of wireless telecommunications facilities; 5. On January 14, 2019, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) Declaratory Ruling and Order FCC 18-133 (“Order”), modified in part by City of Portland v. United States, No. 18-72689 (9th Cir. 2020), removed barriers to wireless infrastructure deployment and established accelerated timelines for processing wireless applications at the local level. This Order also limited the City’s rights as a property owner, restricting 19 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 2 of 11 02-03-2020 the type and amount of fees that can be collected for private use of public property such that the City’s review and approval is primarily limited to reasonable aesthetic requirements, environmental concerns, and land use compatibility. 6. A public hearing was held on April 16, 2020, in the Community Room located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with California Government Code Section 54950 et seq. (“Ralph M. Brown Act”), as well as Chapter 20.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by the Zoning Administrator at this public hearing. 7. The Zoning Administrator adopted Resolution No. ZA2020-031 approving Minor Use Permit No. UP2019-034 for this Project. Although a call for review was attempted by the Planning Commission, said call for review occurred after the designated appeal period had expired in accordance with Section 20.64.030 (Filing and Processing of Appeals and Calls for Review) of the NBMC therefore rendering UP2019 -034 effective. 8. The Project is located within the Coastal Zone. Subsection 21.49.020(B) (Permit and Agreement Required) of the NBMC requires a CDP for a wireless telecommunication facility unless said facility is exempted by Subsection 21.49.020(C) (Exempt Facilities). In this case, the Project does not meet any of the prescribed exemptions; therefore, a CDP is required. Upon finding that a CDP is required, the Applicant revised the request to include said permit. 9. A telephonic public hearing was held on August 27, 2020 in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, due to the Declaration of a State Emergency and Proclamation of Local Emergency related to COVID-19 A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and Chapter 21.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Zoning Administrator at this public hearing. 10. The Zoning Administrator adopted Resolution No. ZA2020-058 approving CDP No. CD2020-118. 11. On September 9, 2020, Mr. Jim Mosher filed an appeal of the Zoning Administrator’s decision citing an inadequate consideration of alternative locations. 12. A de novo telephonic public hearing was held online on October 22, 2020, in the Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California, observing restrictions due to the Declaration of a State Emergency and Proclamation of Local Emergency related to COVID-19. A notice of time, place and purpose of the public hearing was given in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, Chapter 20.62 and Chapter 21.62 of the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Planning Commissioner at this hearing. 20 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 3 of 11 02-03-2020 SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION. 1. The Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15302 and 15303 under Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction) and Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), respectively, of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. 2. In this case, the Project includes the removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight pole to install a small cell wireless facility, including below-grade accessory equipment. 3. The exceptions to the Class 3 categorical exemption under Section 15300.2 are not applicable. The project location does not impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern, does not result in cumulative impacts, does not have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances, does not damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway, is not a hazardous waste site, and is not identified as a historical resource. SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS. In accordance with Subsection 21.52.015(F) (Coastal Development Permits, Findings and Decision) of the NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth: Finding: A. Conforms to all applicable sections of the certified Local Coastal Program. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The Project is considered a Class 3 (Public Right-of-Way) installation. Section 21.49.040 (Telecom Facility Preferences and Prohibited Locations) of the NBMC lists Class 3 installations as third on the installation preference list. It is not proposed at a location that is prohibited by NBMC Subsection 21.49.040(B) (Prohibited Location s). 2. After a thorough review of the area, the Applicant concluded that a more preferred location as defined by NBMC Subsection 21.49.040(A) (Preferred Locations), such as a collocation or a Class 1 or 2 facility, would not be technically feasible from an R F or construction perspective. The analysis explained that small cell facilities are low powered and must be located at the precise location selected to serve the network traffic 21 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 4 of 11 02-03-2020 demands of the specific limited area. Further, this type of service cannot be accomplished with a traditional macro collocation or building mounted site in the area. 3. Four nearby streetlights were identified and investigated by the Applicant as possible alternate locations for the small cell facility however none of the sites were found to be suitable alternatives due to factors such as either the surrounding topography or a lack of available screening. 4. While a Class 1 (Stealth/Screened) wireless facility (PA2018-151) was approved approximately 800 feet southeast on the Bahia Corinthian Yacht Club building at 1601 Bayside Drive, that project was ultimately never constructed due to technical challenges that rendered its construction infeasible. 5. The Project site abuts a residentially zoned property; however, the physical residence at that property is set back from the property line approximately 115 feet and is separated from the right of way by a steep slope. The slope is densely landscaped with a variety of plants. The vegetation provides visual interest and distraction from the streetlight. 6. Given the significant grade differential between the adjacent single-family residence and the street, the general visibility of the Project is lessened for the existing residential development. Across Bayside Drive, approximately 50 feet west, there are residences zoned Multi-Unit Residential (“RM”) with grades that are approximately five feet below the grade of the proposed facility. 7. Bayside Drive is a well-traveled, two-lane, street. It also features bike lanes in both directions and street parking on the northbound side. It is developed with typical street infrastructure including streetlights, utility cabinets, and storm drains. The Project is visually compatible with the existing streetscape environment. 8. The location of the existing streetlight is along a straight portion of road and in line with the surrounding streetscape and existing light poles. The replacement streetlight pole will be installed in the same location as the existing streetlight pole and it will not visually protrude. 9. While Bayside Drive is considered the first public road paralleling the sea, the Project is located on the landward side of the road and not between the first public road and the sea. Pursuant to Subsection 21.49.050(B) of the NBMC, the Project has been reviewed to ensure compliance with Section 21.30.100 (Scenic and Visual Quality Protection). The subject location is located within the first public roadway paralleling the sea and the sea but is not between the first public roadway paralleling the sea and the sea. It further is not proposed on a coastal bluff or canyon, not adjacent to or within the viewshed of a public viewpoint, coastal view road, public park or beach, or public access way, as identified on the Coastal Land Use Plan Map 4-3 (Coastal Views), and does not contain significant natural landforms or vegetation. 10. The Project involves the removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight in the same location with the same luminaire height. It has been designed to blend with its 22 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 5 of 11 02-03-2020 surroundings and, while it will be visible, the replacement streetlight is consistent with the size, shape, style, and design of the existing pole. No above -ground mounted equipment is proposed, and the support equipment is proposed to be placed in underground handholes. All transmission equipment, including remote radio units and the raycap disconnect switch, are fully concealed within a screening shroud. There will be no negative impacts on coastal views or coastal resources with the Project’s implementation. 11. The proposed replacement streetlight and antenna structure will comply with the maximum allowable height limit of 35 feet from existing finished grade. Finding: B. Conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act if the project is located between the nearest public road and the sea or shoreline of any body of water located within the coastal zone. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. As discussed in Fact in Support of Finding A.5, SLC4653 is not located between the nearest public road paralleling the sea or shoreline. There is no pedestrian right -of-way or access on the north side of Bayside Drive and, as such, the Project will not affect the public’s ability to gain access to, use, and/or view the coast and nearby recreational facilities. 2. The Project will allow the installation of a small cell facility that complies with all applicable Local Coastal Program (“LCP”) development standards and maintains development attributes consistent with the existing and anticipated future surrounding neighborhood pattern of development. Therefore, the Project does not have the potential to degrade public views within the Coastal Zone. SECTION 4. DECISION. Now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The City’s Planning Commission hereby finds this Project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Sections 15302 and 15303 under Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction) and Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), respectively, of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. The exceptions to the Class 3 exemption do not apply. 2. The City’s Planning Commission hereby approves CDP No. CD2020-118, subject to the conditions set forth in “Exhibit A,” which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, in addition to the minor use permit already granted via Use Permit No. UP2019-034. 23 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 6 of 11 02-03-2020 3. This action shall become final and effective ten (10) working days following the date this Resolution was adopted unless within such time an appeal or call for review is filed with the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with Title 21 (Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan) of the NBMC. Final action taken by the City may be appealed to the Coastal Commission in compliance with Section 21.64.035 (Appeals to the Coastal Commission) of the NBMC, California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 5.5, Chapter 5, Subchapter 2, Sections 13111 through 13120, and Section 30603 of the California Public Resources Code. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2020. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: BY: _________________________ Chairman BY: _________________________ Secretary 24 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 7 of 11 02-03-2020 EXHIBIT “A” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Division 1. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the plans, including elevation exhibits and visual simulations, stamped and dated with the date of this approval (except as modified by applicable conditions of approval). 2. The Project is subject to all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards, unless specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval. 3. The Applicant shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws. Material violation of any of those laws in connection with the use may be cause for revocation of this approval. 4. The Project approved by this permit shall comply with all applicable Federal and State rules, regulations, and standards. 5. The replacement pole shall be reconstructed in the exact location of the existing streetlight pole. 6. The reconstructed streetlight pole design shall be consistent with the size (including diameter), shape, style, and design of the existing streetlight pole to the greatest extent feasible, including the attached light arm and luminaire. All mounted equipment shall be painted to match the color and style of the replacement streetlight pole. 7. All accessory support equipment of this Project shall be installed underground. 8. All electrical and antenna wiring shall be fully encased within the reconstructed streetlight pole. 9. The Project approved by the use permit shall comply with any easements, covenants, conditions, or restrictions on the underlying City-trust property upon which the Project is located. 10. Anything not specifically approved by this permit is not permitted and must be addressed in a separate and subsequent review. 11. Prior to building permit final, a Height Certification Inspection shall be required prior to final of building permits. The small cell facility and base streetlight pole approved by this permit shall not exceed a total of 27 feet, 5 inches in height from existing grade. The top of the new luminaire shall not exceed a total of 21 feet, 1 inch in height from existing grade and shall match the height and shape of the existing luminaire. 12. Prior to building permit issuance, all contractors and subcontractors shall have a valid City of Newport Beach business license. 25 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 8 of 11 02-03-2020 13. The Applicant shall continually maintain the wireless telecom facility so that it retains its original appearance at the time the building permit is finaled by the City of Newport Beach. 14. On an annual basis, the Applicant shall conduct maintenance inspections of the wireless telecom facility, including the small cell facility and below-grade equipment areas, and make all necessary repairs. The Community Development Director may require additional inspections and/or maintenance activities at his/her discretion. 15. The Applicant shall not prevent the City of Newport Beach from having adequate spectrum capacity on the City's 800 MHz radio frequencies at any time. 16. The Project shall transmit at the approved frequency ranges established by the FCC. The Applicant shall inform the City in writing of any proposed changes to the frequency range in order to prevent interference with the City's Public Safety radio equipment. 17. The Project shall at no time interfere with the frequencies used by the City of Newport Beach for public safety. “Comprehensive advanced planning and frequency coordination” engineering measures shall prevent interference, especially in the choice of frequencies and radio ancillary hardware. This is encouraged in the "Best Practices Guide" published by the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials- International, Inc. ("APCO"), and as endorsed by the FCC. 18. Should interference with the City's Public Safety radio equipment occur, use of the telecom facility authorized by this permit may be suspended until the radio frequency interference is corrected and verification of the compliance is reported. 19. The Applicant shall provide a "single point of contact" for the carrier in its Engineering and Maintenance Departments that is monitored 24 hours per day to ensure continuity on all interference issues, and to which interference problems may be reported. The name, telephone number, fax number, and email address of that person shall be provided to the Community Development Department and Newport Beach Police Department's Support Services Commander prior to activation of the facility. If the point of contact changes, the City shall be immediately alerted and updated. 20. No advertising signage or identifying logos shall be displayed on the Project except for small identification, address, warning, and similar information plates. A detail of the information plates depicting the language on the plate shall be included in the plans submitted for issuance of building permits. 21. Appropriate information warning signs or plates shall be posted on the base streetlight pole of the transmitting antenna. In addition, contact information (e.g., a telephone number) shall be provided on the warning signs or plates. The location of the information warning signs or plates shall be depicted on the plans submitted for construction permits. Signage required by State or federal regulations shall be allowed in its smallest permissible size. 26 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 9 of 11 02-03-2020 22. Prior to the final of building permits, the Applicant shall schedule an evening inspection by the Code Enforcement Division to confirm compliance with lighting. The telecom facility shall be lighted to the extent deemed necessary by the Newport Beach Police and Utilities Departments for security lighting and consistency with other streetlights in the area. 23. The Applicant shall maintain the Project in a manner consistent with this approval. 24. The Applicant shall ensure that its Project complies with the most current regulatory, operations standards, and radio frequency emissions standards adopted by the FCC. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining the most current information from the FCC regarding allowable radio frequency emissions and all other applicable regulations and standards. This information shall be made available by the Applicant upon request of the Community Development Director. 25. The Project shall comply with all applicable provisions of U.S. Code Title 47 (Telecommunications) rules and regulations, including those related to FCC Radio Frequency safety. 26. Prior to final of building permits, the Applicant shall schedule an inspection by the Planning Division to ensure materials and colors match existing architecture as illustrated in the approved photographic simulations and in conformance with NBMC Section 21.49.050. 27. Any operator who intends to abandon or discontinue use of a telecom facility must notify the Planning Division by certified mail no less than thirty (30) days prior to such action. The operator shall have ninety (90) days from the date of abandonment or discontinuance to reactivate use of the facility, or remove the telecom facility and restore the site. 28. The City reserves the right and jurisdiction to review and modify any permit approved pursuant to NBMC Chapter 21.49, including the conditions of approval, based on changed circumstances. The operator shall notify the Planning Division of any proposal to change the height or size of the facility; increase the size, shape, or number of antennas; change the facility's color or materials or location on the site; or increase the signal output above the maximum permissible exposure ("MPE") limits imposed by the radio frequency emissions guidelines of the FCC. Any changed circumstance shall require the operator to apply for a review of the modification, and possible amendment to the use permit, prior to implementing any change. 29. Costal Development Permit No. CD2020-118 shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 21.54.060 (Time Limits and Extensions) of the NBMC unless an extension is otherwise granted. 30. Construction activities shall comply with Section 10.28.040 of the NBMC, which restricts hours of noise-generating construction activities that produce noise to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. Noise-generating construction activities are not allowed on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays. 27 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 10 of 11 02-03-2020 31. This approval may be modified or revoked by the Planning Commission if determined that the proposed uses or conditions under which it is being operated or maintained is detrimental to the public health, welfare or materially injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or if the property is operated or maintained so as to constitute a public nuisance. 32. A copy of the Resolution, including conditions of approval Exhibit “A,” and approved drawings from Southern California Edison (SCE) for the power supply and design, shall be incorporated into the Building Division and field sets of plans prior to issuance of the building permits. 33. The Applicant is responsible for compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). In compliance with the MBTA, grading, brush removal, building demolition, tree trimming, and similar construction activities shall occur between August 16 and January 31, outside of the peak nesting period. If such activities must occur inside the peak nesting season from February 1 to August 15, compliance with the following is required to prevent the taking of Native Birds pursuant to MBTA: A. The construction area shall be inspected for active nests. If birds are observed flying from a nest or sitting on a nest, it can be assumed that the nest is active. Construction activity within 300 feet of an active nest shall be delayed until the nest is no longer active. Continue to observe the nest until the chicks have left the nest and activity is no longer observed. When the nest is no longer active, construction activity can continue in the nest area. B. It is a violation of state and federal law to kill or harm a native bird. To ensure compliance, consider hiring a biologist to assist with the survey for nesting birds, and to determine when it is safe to commence construction activities. If an active nest is found, one or two short follow-up surveys will be necessary to check on the nest and determine when the nest is no longer active. 34. The Applicant shall promptly notify the City if the landscaped parkway of the subject streetlight pole is negatively affected or otherwise damaged by Project implementation. 35. The applicant shall replace any privately installed landscaping disturbed as a result of the telecom installation. Any removed landscaping shall be replaced with the same species and size, wherever feasible, and provided the replacement is in compliance with any applicable encroachment agreements. 36. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including without limitation, attorney’s fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City’s approval of AT&T Small Cell SLC4653, including, but not limited to, Coastal Development Permit No. CD2020-118 (PA2019-115). This 28 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 11 of 11 02-03-2020 indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit or proceeding whether incurred by Applicant, City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The Applicant shall indemnify the City for all of City's costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth in this condition. The Applicant shall pay to the City upon demand any amount owed to the City pursuant to the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition. Public Works Department 37. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, an encroachment permit shall be required. 38. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, traffic control plans illustrating compliance with the 2016 WATCHBook requirements shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department before their implementation. Large construction vehicles shall not be permitted to travel narrow streets as determined by the Public Works Department. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagman. 29 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE30 Attachment No. PC 2 Appeal Form 31 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE32 Appeal Application City Clerk’s Office 100 Civic Center Drive / P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 949-644-3005 Clerk’s Date & Time Stamp Appeals are time sensitive and must be received by the City Clerk specified time period from a decision or final action by a decision-maker. It is advisable to consult with the Department managing the issue if there is question with regards to appealing an action. This is an appeal of the: cc: Department Director, Deputy Director, Staff, File F:\Users\Clerk\Shared\Forms\Appeal Application Updated 8/4/20  (CDD222)Community Development Director Action to the Planning Commission - $1715  (CDD222)Zoning Administrator Action to the Planning Commission - $1715  (CDD222)Coastal Development Application Appeal from Zoning Admin to the Planning Commission – No Fee  (CDD222)Planning Commission Action to the City Council - $1715  (CDD222)Hearing Officer Action to the City Council - $1715  (CDD223)Building Official/Fire Marshal Action to the Building/Fire Board of Appeals - $1715  (CDD224)Chief of Police Action on an Operator License to the City Manager - $853  (RSS073)City Manager Action on a Special Events Permit to the City Council - $1,747  (HBR001)Harbormaster Action on a Lease/Permit to the Harbor Commission - $100  (HBR001)Harbormaster Action to the Harbor Commission - Hourly Cost  (HBR001)Harbor Commission Action to the City Council - Hourly Cost  (PBW018)Public Works Director Action Harbor Development Permits to Harbor Commission - Hourly Cost  (PBW018)Public Works Director Action on a Lease/Permit to the Harbor Commission - $100  Other - Specify decision-maker, appellate body, Municipal Code authority and fee: Appellant Information: Name(s): Address: City/State/Zip: Phone: Email: Appealing Application Regarding: Name of Applicant(s): Date of Final Decision: Project No.: Activity No.: Application Site Address: Description of application: Reason(s) for Appeal (attach a separate sheet if necessary): Signature of Appellant: Date: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Appeal filed and Administrative Fee received: ___________________________, 20____. City Clerk 33 From: Jim Mosher <jimmosher@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 10:43 AM To: Zdeba, Benjamin Subject: Re: Appeal of 8/27/2020 ZA decisions on PA2019-113 and PA2019-115 [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ben, Thank you for reaching out. I have no issues at this time with an October 22 hearing date. In response to your question about alternative sites: 1. With regard to CD2020-119 [SLC0902 (PA2019-113)], any of the three alternatives explored by the consultants is superior from a Coastal Act point of view as they avoid the clear violation of NBMC Subsec. 21.49.040.B.6 that the approved location presents. They would also be consistent with ZA's September 10 decision on CD2020-120 [SLC0007 (PA2019-150)], where streetlights in public open space adjacent to the water, similar to SLC0902, were rejected in favor of a streetlight in the PROW on the inland side of the road, adjacent to a residence. Of the three alternatives presented on August 27, "Alt. #3" appears superior from a coverage perspective as well, since, according to the applicant's map of existing signal strength (page 52 of August 27 staff report), it would be at the location most lacking current service. (with regard to the exemptions from the locations prohibited by NBMC Subsec. 21.49.040.B.6, please note that "utility tower" and "facility" are both terms defined in Section 21.49.030 and an existing streetlight fits neither definition). 2. With regard to CD2020-118 [SLC4653 (PA2019-115)], as you know PC chair Weigand earlier attempted to call for review the ZA's decision on the Title 20 MUP for use of this streetlight. That, in itself, seems sufficient reason for the PC to review staff's belief that SLC4653 is better than the four alternative streetlight locations considered , in particular "Alternative Site No. 4" at an already disturbed location. In addition to the alternatives presented to the ZA by staff on August 27, collocation with T-Mobile on the non-residential yacht club building at 1601 Bayside (as approved with CD2018-067/PA2018-151 on October 25, 2018) would seem to be a preferred solution according to our IP. 34 And although I personally think it would violate NBMC Subsec. 21.49.040.B.6, and I would need to see an accurate simulation before advocating for it, "conversion" of a private light standard in the Bayside Marina parking lot at 1353 Bayside Drive is another option that does not seem to have been explored, and which might possibly be less obtrusive to more of the public than conversion of the streetlights in the PROW along Bayside Drive. *** You did not ask, but I think there are a number of issues that have been raised by at least some of the Planning Commissioners in connection with the few wireless permits they have reviewed, and which I think merit further discussion with them relevant to both of these appeals. Those include: • Is the Master License Agreement really part of a master plan? If so, what is the plan? • Does the MLA somehow override the code and mean streetlights are to be approved even when higher priority non-residential sites might be used instead? • How are other carriers to be accommodated? • Why is present and future collocation not part of the discussion? • What happens when, as has been hinted at, 5G requires even denser networks? Yours sincerely, Jim Mosher On Tuesday, September 15, 2020, 04:42:50 PM PDT, Zdeba, Benjamin <bzdeba@newportbeachca.gov> wrote: Hi Mr. Mosher, I reviewed your appeal applications for these projects. I understand your opinion is the alternative sites analyses are insufficient and there are better locations. Do you have alternative locations to suggest and the reasons to substantiate those alternative locations? 35 Also, we are aiming to bring these to the Planning Commission on October 22, 2020. Please let me know if you have any issues with that date. Thanks, Ben Z. BENJAMIN M. ZDEBA, AICP Community Development Department Senior Planner bzdeba@newportbeachca.gov 949-644-3253 From: Jurjis, Seimone <sjurjis@newportbeachca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2020 3:58 PM To: Jim Mosher <jimmosher@yahoo.com> Cc: Zdeba, Benjamin <bzdeba@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: FW: Appeal of 8/27/2020 ZA decisions on PA2019-113 and PA2019-115 Thank you Jim, 36 I have received your appeals, and we will review them and get back to you if we need more information. SEIMONE JURJIS, P.E., C.B.O. Community Development Department Community Development Director sjurjis@newportbeachca.gov 949-644-3282 From: Jim Mosher <jimmosher@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 3:03 PM To: Jurjis, Seimone <sjurjis@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Appeal of 8/27/2020 ZA decisions on PA2019-113 and PA2019-115 [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Director Jurjis, Please find attached my appeals of two decisions made by the Zoning Administrator on August 27, 2020. They are being filed with you as provided in NBMC Section 21.64.030.B.1.a.i. 37 Please acknowledge receipt. Additional information on the basis for the appeals can be provided if requested. Yours sincerely, Jim Mosher 38 Attachment No. PC 3 Adopted Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-058 39 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE40 RESOLUTION NO. ZA2020-058 A RESOLUTION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. CD2020-118 FOR A SMALL CELL WIRELESS FACILITY LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ON CITY STREETLIGHT NUMBER SLC4653, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BAYSIDE DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 900 FEET NORTHWEST OF EL PASEO DRIVE (PA2019-115) THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS. 1. An application was filed by New Cingular Wireless, LLC (Applicant), with respect to City of Newport Beach Streetlight Number SLC4653, located within the public right-of-way at the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 900 feet northwest of El Paseo Drive requesting a coastal development permit (CDP). 2. The Applicant proposes the installation of a small cell wireless facility on a City-owned streetlight pole. Project implementation will be fully contained within the public right-of-way on Bayside Drive and includes the following: (1) Removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight; (2) Installation of a small cell wireless facility that consists of four (4) remote radio units, a raycap disconnect, and an omni-directional antenna within a 12-inch diameter antenna screening shroud. This equipment would be fixed to the top of the replaced streetlight pole for a maximum height of 27 feet, 5 inches; and (3) Establishment of support equipment in an adjacent below-grade vault. 3. The streetlight pole is located within the public right-of-way. The proposal is regulated by City Council Policy L-23 (Siting of Wireless Telecommunications Equipment on City- Owned Property), as well as Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC) Chapter 20.49 (Wireless Telecommunication Facilities). Pursuant to Section 20.49.060 (Permit Review Procedures) of the NBMC, a minor use permit is required for this type of installation. A minor use permit (UP2019-034) for this project was previously reviewed and approved by the Zoning Administrator at a public hearing on April 16, 2020. There was no appeal filed and the Minor Use Permit is now effective. However, since that approval, it has been determined that a CDP is also required. 4. The project is located within the Coastal Zone. Subsection 21.49.020(B) (Permit and Agreement Required) of the NBMC requires a coastal development permit for a wireless telecommunication facility unless said facility is exempted by Subsection 21.49.020(C) (Exempt Facilities). In this case, the project does not meet any of the prescribed exemptions; therefore, a coastal development permit is required. 41 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-058 Page 2 of 10 01-25-19 5. A telephonic public hearing was held online on August 27, 2020, observing restrictions due to the Declaration of a State Emergency and Proclamation of Local Emergency related to COVID-19. A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Zoning Administrator at this hearing. SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION. 1. This project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15302 and 15303 under Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction) and Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), respectively, of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. 2. In this case, the proposal includes the removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight pole to install a small cell wireless facility, including below-grade accessory equipment. 3. The exceptions to the Class 3 categorical exemption under Section 15300.2 are not applicable. The project location does not impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern, does not result in cumulative impacts, does not have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances, does not damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway, is not a hazardous waste site, and is not identified as a historical resource. SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS. In accordance with Subsection 21.52.015(F) (Coastal Development Permits, Findings and Decision) of the NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth: Finding: A. Conforms to all applicable sections of the certified Local Coastal Program. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The project is considered a Class 3 (Public Right-of-Way) installation. Section 21.49.040 (Telecom Facility Preferences and Prohibited Locations) of the NBMC lists Class 3 42 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-058 Page 3 of 10 01-25-19 installations as third on the installation preference list. It is not proposed at a location that is prohibited by NBMC Subsection 21.49.040(B) (Prohibited Locations). 2. The Applicant analyzed alternative sites for the project and ultimately concluded that a more preferred location as defined by NBMC Subsection 21.49.040(A) (Preferred Locations), such as a collocation or a Class 1 or 2 facility, would not be technically feasible from an RF or construction perspective. The analysis explained that small cell facilities are low powered and must be located at the precise location selected to serve the network traffic demands of the specific limited area. Further, this type of service cannot be accomplished with a traditional macro collocation or building mounted site in the area. 3. The project site abuts a residentially zoned property however the physical residence at that property is setback from the property line approximately 115 feet and is separated from the right of way by an extremely steep slope. The slope is highly landscaped and provides visual interest and distraction from the streetlight. Given the significant grade differential and the lower setting of the streetlight, the general visibility of the proposed small cell facility is lessened for the existing development, which helps to ensure visual compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood and its residential character. Across Bayside Drive, approximately 50 feet west, there are additional residences zoned RM with grades that are approximately five feet below the grade of the proposed facility. 4. The existing streetlight is located on the inland side of a well-traveled street. The location of the existing streetlight is not within in a curve or at a bend in the road and is in line with the surrounding streetscape and existing light poles. The replacement streetlight will be installed in the same location as the existing streetlight and it will not visually protrude. 5. While Bayside Drive is considered the first public road paralleling the sea, the project site is located on the landward side of the road and not between the first public road and the sea. The project has been reviewed pursuant to Subsection 21.49.050(B) of the NBMC. It complies with Section 21.30.100 (Scenic and Visual Quality Protection) of the NBMC. The subject location is not located within the first public roadway paralleling the sea and the sea but is not between the first public roadway paralleling the sea and the sea. It is further is not on a coastal bluff or canyon, not adjacent to or within the viewshed of a public viewpoint, coastal view road, public park or beach, or public accessway, as identified on the Coastal Land Use Plan Map 4-3 (Coastal Views), and does not contain significant natural landforms or vegetation. 6. The project scope involves the removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight in the same location with the same luminaire height. The project has been designed to blend with its surroundings while it will be visible. The replacement streetlight is consistent with the size, shape, style, and design of the existing pole. No above-ground mounted equipment is proposed, and the support equipment is proposed to be placed in underground handholes. All transmission equipment, including remote radio units and the raycap disconnect switch, are fully concealed within a screening shroud. There will 43 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-058 Page 4 of 10 01-25-19 be no negative impacts on coastal views or coastal resources with the project’s implementation. 7. The proposed replacement streetlight and antenna structure will comply with the maximum allowable height limit of 35 feet from existing finished grade. Finding: B. Conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act if the project is located between the nearest public road and the sea or shoreline of any body of water located within the coastal zone. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. As discussed in Fact in Support of Finding A.5, SLC4653 is not located between the nearest public road paralleling the sea or shoreline. There is no pedestrian right-of-way or access on the north side of Bayside Drive and, as such, the project will not affect the public’s ability to gain access to, use, and/or view the coast and nearby recreational facilities. 2. The project will allow the installation of a small cell facility that complies with all applicable Local Coastal Program (LCP) development standards and maintains development attributes consistent with the existing and anticipated future surrounding neighborhood pattern of development. Therefore, the project does not have the potential to degrade public views within the Coastal Zone. SECTION 4. DECISION. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. This project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15302 and 15303 under Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction) and Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), respectively, of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. The exceptions to the Class 3 exemption do not apply. 2. The Zoning Administrator of the City of Newport Beach hereby approves Coastal Development Permit No. CD2020-118, subject to the conditions set forth in “Exhibit A,” which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. This action shall become final and effective 14 days following the date this Resolution was adopted unless within such time an appeal or call for review is filed with the Community Development Director in accordance with the provisions of Title 21 Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan of the NBMC. Final action taken by the City may be appealed to the Coastal Commission in compliance with Section 21.64.035 of the 44 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-058 Page 5 of 10 01-25-19 NBMC and Title 14 California Code of Regulations, Sections 13111 through 13120, and Section 30603 of the Coastal Act. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2020. 45 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-058 Page 6 of 10 01-25-19 EXHIBIT “A” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Division 1. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the plans, including elevation exhibits and visual simulations, stamped and dated with the date of this approval (except as modified by applicable conditions of approval). 2. The project is subject to all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards, unless specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval. 3. The Applicant shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws. Material violation of any of those laws in connection with the use may be cause for revocation of this approval. 4. The telecom facility approved by this permit shall comply with all applicable Federal and State rules, regulations, and standards. 5. The replacement pole shall be reconstructed in the exact location of the existing streetlight pole. 6. The reconstructed streetlight pole design shall be consistent with the size (including diameter), shape, style, and design of the existing streetlight pole to the greatest extent feasible, including the attached light arm and luminaire. All mounted equipment shall be painted to match the color and style of the replacement streetlight pole. 7. All accessory support equipment of this facility shall be installed underground. 8. All electrical and antenna wiring shall be fully encased within the reconstructed streetlight pole. 9. The telecom facility approved by the use permit shall comply with any easements, covenants, conditions, or restrictions on the underlying City-trust property upon which the facility is located. 10. Anything not specifically approved by this permit is not permitted and must be addressed in a separate and subsequent review. 11. Prior to building permit final, a Height Certification Inspection shall be required prior to final of building permits. The small cell facility and base streetlight pole approved by this permit shall not exceed a total of 27 feet, 5 inches in height from existing grade. The top of the new luminaire shall not exceed a total of 21 feet, 1 inch in height from existing grade and shall match the height and shape of the existing luminaire. 46 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-058 Page 7 of 10 01-25-19 12. Prior to building permit issuance, all contractors and subcontractors shall have a valid City of Newport Beach business license. 13. The Applicant shall continually maintain the wireless telecom facility so that it retains its original appearance at the time the building permit is finaled by the City of Newport Beach. 14. On an annual basis, the Applicant shall conduct maintenance inspections of the wireless telecom facility, including the small cell facility and below-grade equipment areas, and make all necessary repairs. The Community Development Director may require additional inspections and/or maintenance activities at his/her discretion. 15. The Applicant shall not prevent the City of Newport Beach from having adequate spectrum capacity on the City's 800 MHz radio frequencies at any time. 16. The facility shall transmit at the approved frequency ranges established by the FCC. The Applicant shall inform the City in writing of any proposed changes to the frequency range in order to prevent interference with the City's Public Safety radio equipment. 17. The telecommunications facility shall at no time interfere with the frequencies used by the City of Newport Beach for public safety. “Comprehensive advanced planning and frequency coordination” engineering measures shall prevent interference, especially in the choice of frequencies and radio ancillary hardware. This is encouraged in the "Best Practices Guide" published by the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials-International, Inc. ("APCO"), and as endorsed by the FCC. 18. Should interference with the City's Public Safety radio equipment occur, use of the telecom facility authorized by this permit may be suspended until the radio frequency interference is corrected and verification of the compliance is reported. 19. The Applicant shall provide a "single point of contact" for the carrier in its Engineering and Maintenance Departments that is monitored 24 hours per day to ensure continuity on all interference issues, and to which interference problems may be reported. The name, telephone number, fax number, and email address of that person shall be provided to the Community Development Department and Newport Beach Police Department's Support Services Commander prior to activation of the facility. If the point of contact changes, the City shall be immediately alerted and updated. 20. No advertising signage or identifying logos shall be displayed on the telecom facility except for small identification, address, warning, and similar information plates. A detail of the information plates depicting the language on the plate shall be included in the plans submitted for issuance of building permits. 21. Appropriate information warning signs or plates shall be posted on the base streetlight pole of the transmitting antenna. In addition, contact information (e.g., a telephone number) shall be provided on the warning signs or plates. The location of the information warning signs or plates shall be depicted on the plans submitted for construction permits. 47 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-058 Page 8 of 10 01-25-19 Signage required by State or federal regulations shall be allowed in its smallest permissible size. 22. Prior to the final of building permits, the Applicant shall schedule an evening inspection by the Code Enforcement Division to confirm compliance with lighting. The telecom facility shall be lighted to the extent deemed necessary by the Newport Beach Police and Utilities Departments for security lighting and consistency with other streetlights in the area. 23. The Applicant shall maintain the telecom facility in a manner consistent with this approval. 24. The Applicant shall ensure that its telecom facility complies with the most current regulatory, operations standards, and radio frequency emissions standards adopted by the FCC. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining the most current information from the FCC regarding allowable radio frequency emissions and all other applicable regulations and standards. This information shall be made available by the Applicant upon request of the Community Development Director. 25. The facility shall comply with all applicable provisions of U.S. Code Title 47 (Telecommunications) rules and regulations, including those related to FCC Radio Frequency safety. 26. Prior to final of building permits, the Applicant shall schedule an inspection by the Planning Division to ensure materials and colors match existing architecture as illustrated in the approved photographic simulations and in conformance with NBMC Section 21.49.050. 27. Any operator who intends to abandon or discontinue use of a telecom facility must notify the Planning Division by certified mail no less than thirty (30) days prior to such action. The operator shall have ninety (90) days from the date of abandonment or discontinuance to reactivate use of the facility, or remove the telecom facility and restore the site. 28. The City reserves the right and jurisdiction to review and modify any permit approved pursuant to NBMC Chapter 21.49, including the conditions of approval, based on changed circumstances. The operator shall notify the Planning Division of any proposal to change the height or size of the facility; increase the size, shape, or number of antennas; change the facility's color or materials or location on the site; or increase the signal output above the maximum permissible exposure ("MPE") limits imposed by the radio frequency emissions guidelines of the FCC. Any changed circumstance shall require the operator to apply for a review of the modification, and possible amendment to the use permit, prior to implementing any change. 29. Costal Development Permit No. CD2020-118 shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 21.54.060 (Time Limits and Extensions) of the NBMC unless an extension is otherwise granted. 48 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-058 Page 9 of 10 01-25-19 30. Construction activities shall comply with NBMC Section 10.28.040, which restricts hours of noise-generating construction activities that produce noise to between the hours of 7 a.m. and 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. Noise-generating construction activities are not allowed on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays. 31. This approval may be modified or revoked by the Zoning Administrator if determined that the proposed uses or conditions under which it is being operated or maintained is detrimental to the public health, welfare or materially injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or if the property is operated or maintained so as to constitute a public nuisance. 32. A copy of the Resolution, including conditions of approval Exhibit “A,” and approved drawings from Southern California Edison (SCE) for the power supply and design, shall be incorporated into the Building Division and field sets of plans prior to issuance of the building permits. 33. The Applicant is responsible for compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). In compliance with the MBTA, grading, brush removal, building demolition, tree trimming, and similar construction activities shall occur between August 16 and January 31, outside of the peak nesting period. If such activities must occur inside the peak nesting season from February 1 to August 15, compliance with the following is required to prevent the taking of Native Birds pursuant to MBTA: A. The construction area shall be inspected for active nests. If birds are observed flying from a nest or sitting on a nest, it can be assumed that the nest is active. Construction activity within 300 feet of an active nest shall be delayed until the nest is no longer active. Continue to observe the nest until the chicks have left the nest and activity is no longer observed. When the nest is no longer active, construction activity can continue in the nest area. B. It is a violation of state and federal law to kill or harm a native bird. To ensure compliance, consider hiring a biologist to assist with the survey for nesting birds, and to determine when it is safe to commence construction activities. If an active nest is found, one or two short follow-up surveys will be necessary to check on the nest and determine when the nest is no longer active. 34. The Applicant shall promptly notify the City if the landscaped parkway of the subject streetlight pole is negatively affected or otherwise damaged by project implementation. 35. The applicant shall replace any privately installed landscaping disturbed as a result of the telecom installation. Any removed landscaping shall be replaced with the same species and size, wherever feasible, and provided the replacement is in compliance with any applicable encroachment agreements. 49 Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-058 Page 10 of 10 01-25-19 36. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including without limitation, attorney’s fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City’s approval of AT&T Small Cell SLC4653, including, but not limited to, Coastal Development Permit No. CD2020-118 (PA2019-115). This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit or proceeding whether incurred by Applicant, City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The Applicant shall indemnify the City for all of City's costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth in this condition. The Applicant shall pay to the City upon demand any amount owed to the City pursuant to the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition. Public Works Department 37. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, an encroachment permit shall be required. 38. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, traffic control plans illustrating compliance with the 2016 WATCHBook requirements shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department before their implementation. Large construction vehicles shall not be permitted to travel narrow streets as determined by the Public Works Department. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagman. Additional Conditions 39. No demolition or construction materials, equipment debris, or waste, shall be placed or stored in a location that would enter sensitive habitat, receiving waters, or a storm drain or result in impacts to environmentally sensitive habitat areas, streams, canals, the beach, wetlands or their buffers. 50 Attachment No. PC 4 Minutes of Zoning Administrator Meeting of August 27, 2020 51 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE52 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE NEWPORT BEACH ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 08/27/2020 Page 3 of 4 a landscaped parkway. He also discussed the Lake Street Park property and views from it. He clarified that views from Lake Street Park are generally towards the canal. Views from this park towards the proposed project site are obstructed by existing landscaping that borders the park to the west. The Zoning Administrator agreed that all findings are met for this project and approved the project with the addition of a condition relating to minimizing or preventing construction-related impacts. Action: Approved ITEM NO. 3 AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Coastal Development Permit No. CD2020-118 (PA2019-115) Site Location: Public right-of-way, City streetlight number SLC4653, on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 900 feet northwest of El Paseo Drive Council District 5 Joselyn Perez, Assistant Planner, provided a brief project description stating that AT&T is requesting to remove and replace City Streetlight No. SLC4653, which is located within the public right-of-way on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 900 feet northwest of El Paseo Drive. The project site abuts a steep, vegetated slope, and there is no sidewalk on the project side of Bayside Drive. The surrounding land uses are residential and vary in density. The existing single-family residence adjacent to the project site is separated from the streetlight and proposed telecom facility by a significant grade differential. The existing streetlight measures 19 feet, 6 inches in height with a luminaire height of 21 feet, inch. The replacement streetlight will maintain the existing luminaire height of 21 feet, 1 inch and have an overall facility height of 27 feet, 5 inches which is below the City’s 35-foot height limit for telecom facilities. Staff considered the project’s consistency with the Public View Protection regulations of Section 21.49.050(B) (Public View Protection) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. The project site is not located between the sea and the first public roadway paralleling the sea, is not on a coastal bluff or canyon, is not adjacent to or within the viewshed of a public view point, coastal view road, public park or beach, or public accessway, as identified on Coastal Land Use Plan Map 4-3 (Coastal Views), and does not contain significant natural landforms or vegetation. In accordance with NBMC Sections 20.30.100 (Public View Protection), 21.30.100 (Scenic and Visual Quality Protection), and General Plan Natural Resources Policy NR 20.3 (Public Views), the location is not located within a protected public view corridor. The visual impact analysis conducted by staff of the proposed project site found there to be no impact to public views. AT&T considered four alternative locations also along Bayside Drive. Three of the four sites were determined to be infeasible due to construction constraints. Alternative Site No. 4, while found to be a feasible location from a constructability perspective, is located at a bend in Bayside Drive. This location is much more visually intrusive to approaching motorists whereas the proposed site blends in with the existing streetscape and as such Alternative Site No. 4 was eliminated as a viable alternative location. Ms. Perez added that telecom facilities require approval of a Minor Use Permit and that this project had been heard on April 16, 2020 by the Zoning Administrator and approved for minor use permit number UP2019-034. Ms. Perez concluded that staff believes all required findings can be made for the CDP and recommends approval of this project, as submitted. Zoning Administrator Murillo commented that there is a storm drain inlet and added a condition of approval that the inlet will be protected from debris. Franklin Orozco of M-Squared Wireless, on behalf of the applicant, AT&T, then spoke and added that Alternative Site No. 4 has additional issues beyond the increased visibility. There are trees in the vicinity of the streetlight that would cause conflict with a Public Works requirement to maintain 10 feet of separation from trees. He then stated that he agrees with all of the required conditions. The Zoning Administrator opened the public hearing. One member of the public, Jim Mosher, spoke. Mr. Mosher expressed concern that the adjacent hillside is a coastal bluff, which is a natural resource as defined in the Coastal Land Use Plan, and this project would 53 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE NEWPORT BEACH ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 08/27/2020 Page 4 of 4 impact views of coastal bluffs. He reiterated his belief that Alternative Site No. 4 is a superior option as its hillside is already disturbed with a solar panel structure and then noted that the coverage map provided by AT&T suggests coverage from the new facility will reach the residences above which seemed contrary to previous project justifications from AT&T. Mr. Mosher inquired as to why AT&T could not place their antennas like a nearby telecom facility, which utilizes stealth technology, on the roof of a yacht club. The Zoning Administrator closed the public hearing. Senior Planner Zdeba responded to Mr. Mosher’s inquiry regarding the yacht club. He explained that while an entitlement was obtained by the carrier T-Mobile to install a faux chimney on the yacht club, the applicant ultimately had not yet built the facility due to technical issues. Zoning Administrator Murillo considered the alternative sites for the project. He acknowledged that alternative sites number 1 and number 2 were located closer to the bluffs and would ultimately have greater impacts to views of the natural bluff. Zoning Administrator Murillo continued that he had driven along Bayside Drive and alternative site number 4 is both at a bend in the road and is backdropped by a solar panel structure which makes the facility much more visible to approaching motorists. He then discussed the landscaping installed by the homeowner above on the slope adjacent to the proposed project site. The landscaping, while providing a visual distraction and screening of the telecom, obscures the view of the natural coastal bluff. He concluded that the proposed location is the most appropriate location for the project. Action: Approved as amended V. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS None. VI. ADJOURNMENT The hearing was adjourned at 10:46 a.m. The agenda for the Zoning Administrator Hearing was posted on August 21, 2020, at 3:20 p.m. on the digital display board located inside the vestibule of the Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center Drive and on the City’s website on August 21, 2020, at 3:15 p.m. 54 Attachment No. PC 5 Applicant’s Project Description and Justification 55 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE56 Exhibit B New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility AT&T Site ID:HBNPB_038and FA#14807367 Project Address: City Streetlight No. SCL4653 located on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 900 feet northwest of El Paseo Drive, Newport Beach. Project Narrative New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility (“AT&T”) is proposing to install new small cell wireless telecommunications facility to serve residents and businesses in this portion of the community. Small cells are low-power, low-profile wireless communications facilities that improve signal quality and capacity within AT&T’s existing wireless network. The proposed small cell facility will help AT&T provide and improve critical wireless services in this area. AT&T estimates that since the introduction of the iPhone in 2007, mobile data usage has increased 470,000% on its network. AT&T customers’ growing demand for mobile data services will continue to increase. Customer needs require AT&T to design and maintain its network to provide and improve wireless signal quality and to increase data rates sufficient to stream video. Areas that do not meet this minimal standard, or where wireless service is otherwise compromised, represent service issues that must be addressed. Specifically, this proposed small cell facility will improve AT&T’s wireless services by offloading network traffic carried by existing macro facilities in the area. In addition, faster data rates allow customers to get on and off the network quickly, which produces more efficient use of AT&T’s limited spectrum. By placing the small cell facility in areas where AT&T’s existing wireless telecommunications facilities are constrained and where AT&T experiences especially high network traffic, AT&T can address the existing and forecasted demand and support 5G speeds in the near future. Improving signal quality and Increasing data speed is critical to providing the mobile experience customers demand and to manage the unprecedented increase in mobile data usage on AT&T’s network. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) tracks the rates at which American households are shifting from landlines to wireless telecommunications. According to the CDC’s latest Wireless Substitution Report, more than 70 percent of Americans rely exclusively or primarily on wireless communications in their homes.1 In addition, the FCC estimates that 70 percent of all 911 calls are made from wireless devices.2 And with AT&T’s selection by FirstNet as the wireless service provider to build and manage the nationwide first responder wireless network, each new or modified facility will help strengthen first responder communications. Description of Service and Site Type AT&T selected the proposed facility as the best available means to address its service objectives in this portion of the city. The proposed small cell facility will be located in the public right-of-way, where AT&T has a right to place its equipment pursuant to Section 7901 of the California Public Utilities Code. The proposed node is a Pico cell site and will provide 4G services to the surrounding area. The project will involve the placement of a small antenna and associated small cell equipment enclosed within a replacement streetlight. For this small cell, AT&T proposes to install a 10-inch diameter omni-directional antenna and radios at the 1See Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, January-June 2018, available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless201812.pdf. 2See 911 Wireless Services, available at https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/911-wireless-services. 57 Exhibit B Page 2 of 3 top of a replacement streetlight, fully concealed within a 12-inch diameter shroud. The facility will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic. It will not adversely affect the surrounding properties and will have a minimal physical and aesthetic footprint in this area. In addition, the proposed facility fully complies with applicable design criteria. Therefore, the City can easily make the necessary findings for approval for this small cell facility. The project scope will consist of the following: • Removal and replacement of a streetlight. • Installation of a single omni-directional antenna. • Installation of four remote radio units and raycap disconnect switch within a shroud. • Installation of below grade power and fiber handholds. Conformance with FCC Regulations The proposed low powered antenna installation attached to the utility pole is considered categorical excluded by the FCC based on the analysis included in the FCC Optional Checklist for Determination of the Local Official’s Guide to RF (attached). Installations that are categorically excluded are considered to meet or exceed the FCC standards for RF Emissions. Construction, Maintenance and Monitoring Construction of the proposed project will take approximately 30-days. All construction will be done in a manner that minimizes impact to residents and/or businesses in the area. Existing underground or overhead power and fiber connections will be used with minimal trenching. Directional boring will be used when deemed appropriate for each specific location. Maintenance of the subject facility is minimal. The telecom operator will be responsible for maintenance of the telecom facility including, but not limited to, any missing, discolored or damaged screening, all graffiti will be removed promptly, and the facility kept clean and free of litter. Monitoring is typically done from AT&T’s switching offices. If needed, a site visit to change any radio equipment will be coordinated with the city through the appropriate process. Site Preferred Location and Alternative Analysis The City of Newport Beach Code Section 20.49.040 lists the preferred locations for telecommunication facilities to limit adverse visual effects and the proliferation of new or individual telecom facilities in the City. Class 3 is defined as public right-of-way installations where the facility can be installed on a structure located in the public right-of-way. The proposed AT&T small cell facility falls under this category and is the third on the list of preferred locations. The proposed installation is consistent with the approved city designs under the master agreement between AT&T and the City. Due to the slim design, camouflaged antenna, use of existing city structures within the right-of-way, AT&T believes that the changes to the existing streetlights are non-material or aesthetic changes that would not impact the surrounding development of this area. The other preferred locations as listed by code relate to the use of existing non-residential buildings or other structures, which are stealth and fully screened and not visible to the general public. These types of locations or structures are not feasible designs for small cells located within the public right-of-way. AT&T is committed to providing wireless telecommunications services and faster data rates throughout the City of Newport Beach and is doing so by installing the least intrusive technology, with the least intrusive design at the least intrusive locations. Rather than construct traditional tower facilities in or near residential 58 Exhibit B Page 3 of 3 neighborhoods, AT&T is choosing to deploy very small facilities, called “small cells,” that can be installed on utility infrastructure in the public right-of-way. A small cell is a low-powered cell site, which, when grouped with other small cells, can provide coverage in areas where traditional macro wireless facilities are not feasible. Although the signal from each small cell antenna covers a shorter range than a conventional tower site, small cells can be effective tools to help close significant gaps in service coverage or offload capacity with a minimal visual impact. Node HBNPB_038 will help AT&T close a significant gap in this area of the City by the least intrusive means, see attached coverage maps. AT&T has evaluated other locations for this project in the immediate vicinity of the proposed node. Attached is the alternative site analysis with detailed description of each alternative. Statement of Code Compliance The overall site location and design complies with applicable code provisions, the General Plan, and other published siting guidelines. For further analysis regarding the applicable code, please see the attached Statement of Code Compliance. 59 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE60 Attachment No. PC 6 Alternative Locations Studied and Rejected 61 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE62 © 2018 AT&T Intellectual Property. AT&T, Globe logo, and DIRECTV are registered trademarks and service marks of AT&T Intellectual Property and/or AT&T affiliated companies. All other marks are the property of their respecKve owners. AT&T Small Cell Site ID: CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_038 AlternaKve Sites Analysis March 12, 2020 City streetlight No. SCL4653 located on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 900 feet northwest of El Paseo Drive, Newport Beach. 63 2 Map of Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_038 and Alterna<ve Sites On this aerial map, AT&T’s proposed Small Cell Node HBNPB_038 is designated by a red marker and the alternaKve sites are idenKfied by yellow markers. 64 3 Proposed Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_038 • AT&T is committed to providing and improving wireless telecommunications services and faster data rates throughout the City of Newport Beach. • Rather than construct tradiKonal macro faciliKes, AT&T is choosing to deploy very small faciliKes, called “small cells,” that can be installed on uKlity infrastructure in the public right-of-way. • A small cell is a low-powered cell site, which, when grouped with other small cells, can provide coverage in areas where tradiKonal macro wireless faciliKes are discouraged. • Small cells are effecKve tools to provide and improve criKcal wireless services with a minimal impact. By placing small cells in areas where AT&T’s exisKng faciliKes are constrained and where AT&T experiences high network traffic, AT&T can address exisKng and forecasted demands. • Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_038 will improve signal quality and capacity within AT&T ’s wireless network in this porKon of Newport Beach. 65 4 • AT&T proposes to place a Small Cell Node on a replacement streetlight pole in the public right-of-way. (Lat/Long 33.609031, -117.886471). • AT&T proposed node is a stealth facility under City Code §20.49.030(N) and is designed to be as visually inconspicuous as possible. • The proposed node is located within a wide flat landscape area adjacent to a heavily vegetaKve hillside. This locaKon is as visually inconspicuous as possible. • AT&T determined that this locaKon is viable in that necessary uKliKes are available and this locaKon is feasible from a radio frequency perspecKve. The locaKon is free of obstrucKons and has good line of site to meet coverage objecKves. AT&T will need to install a replacement pole to accommodate Small Cell Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_038 - Proposed Loca<on City streetlight No. SCL4653 located on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 900 feet north of El Paseo Drive. • Photo SimulaKon of Proposed Small Cell 66 5 • AlternaKve Site #1 is a city streetlight in the public right-of-way. The site is located approximately 200 feet southeast of the proposed site. • The exisKng streetlight is adjacent to a steep hillside and is bounded by a retaining wall on three sides. • The steeper hillside at this locaKon would make it difficult to replace the streetlight and install required pull boxes for the small cell. • ConstrucKon at this locaKon is likely to generate a greater impact to the hillside with addiKonal grading and expansion retaining walls. • A small cell at this alternaKve site would be more intrusive than the proposed node. Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_038 – Alterna<ve Site #1 City streetlight No. SCL4652 located on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 710 feet north of El Paseo Drive. 67 6 • AlternaKve Site #2 is a city streetlight in the public right- of-way. The site is located approximately 400 feet southeast of the proposed site. • The exisKng streetlight is adjacent to a steep hillside and is bounded by a retaining wall on three sides. • The steeper hillside at this locaKon would make it difficult to replace the streetlight and install required pull boxes for the small cell. • ConstrucKon at this locaKon is likely to generate a greater impact to the hillside with addiKonal grading and expansion retaining walls. • A small cell at this alternaKve site would be more intrusive than the proposed node. Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_038 – Alterna<ve Site #2 City streetlight No. SCL4651 located on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 530 feet north of El Paseo Drive. 68 7 • AlternaKve Site #3 is a city streetlight in the public right- of-way. The site is located approximately 200 feet northwest of the proposed site. • The exisKng streetlight is adjacent to a steep hillside and is bounded by a retaining wall on three sides. • The steeper hillside at this locaKon would make it difficult to replace the streetlight and install required pull boxes for the small cell. • ConstrucKon at this locaKon is likely to generate a greater impact to the hillside with addiKonal grading and expansion retaining walls. • A small cell at this alternaKve site would be more intrusive than the proposed node. Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_038 – Alterna<ve Site #3 City streetlight No. SCL4654 located on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 1100 feet north of El Paseo Drive. 69 8 • AlternaKve Site #4 is a city streetlight in the public right- of-way. The site is located approximately 400 feet northwest of the proposed site. • The streetlight is within a narrow space between the street curb and a pedestrian access stairs. The limited space at this locaKon makes it infeasible to replace the streetlight for the proposed node. • A small cell at this alternaKve site would be more intrusive than the proposed node. Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_038 – Alterna<ve Site #4 City streetlight No. SCL4655 located on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 1300 feet north of El Paseo Drive. 70 9 Proposed Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_038 Conclusion • The proposed small cell node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_038 is an integral part of an overall small cell soluKon to help close AT&T ’s significant service coverage gap in this porKon of Newport Beach. • The proposed small cell will provide wireless telecommunicaKons service and faster data rates to the area residents & visitors. • The proposed small cell is the best available and least intrusive means to help AT&T provide and improve criKcal wireless services in the surrounding areas, adding low-power, low-profile equipment to uKlity infrastructure in the public right-of-way. • The use of a replacement streetlight allows a stealth design for the proposed equipment and antenna. • The proposed installaKon will enhance wireless communicaKon with the least visual impact to the community. 71 72 Attachment No. PC 7 Coverage Maps 73 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE74 © 2016 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. AT&T Proprietary (Internal Use Only) Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies except under written agreement. AT&T Coverage Maps* Small Cell node CRAN_RLOS_CSTAM_HBNPB_038 *In its recent small cell deployment order, the FCC rejected the need for wireless providers to demonstrate a significant gap to support a wireless siting application. The FCC explained that a local government could effectively prohibit wireless service “not only by rendering a service provider unable to provide existing service in a new geographic area or by restricting the entry of a new provider in providing service in a particular area, but also by materially inhibiting the introduction of new services or the improvement of existing services. Thus, an effective prohibition includes materially inhibiting additional services or improving existing services.” So, such maps cannot be required. Nonetheless, to comply with the city’s application requirements, AT&T is submitting signal strength coverage maps that depict its wireless service coverage for LTE service at 1900 MHz as it exists now and as predicted after the small cell is installed and on air. Note, however, that the city’s requirement for these maps is inappropriate under applicable law and not relevant in any event because AT&T’s proposed facility provides capacity relief within the existing wireless network. 75 LTE 1900_Coverage without Small cell © 2016 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. AT&T Proprietary (Internal Use Only) Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies except under written agreement. Macro site Proposed small cell Nodes 76 LTE 1900_Coverage with Small cell © 2016 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. AT&T Proprietary (Internal Use Only) Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies except under written agreement. Macro site Proposed small cell Nodes 77 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE78 Attachment No. PC 8 Photographic Simulations and Project Plans 79 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE80 TITLE SHEETT-1SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISEDDATE SIGNED: 03/09/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/20211452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780DESTINATION WILL BE ON THE LEFT.CITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OF BAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900' N OF EL PASEODRIVE,CORONA DEL MAR,CA 92660PROJECT SITE INFORMATIONPROJECT TEAMCONSTRUCTION DRAWINGDIG ALERTIF USING 11"x17" PLOT, DRAWING WILL BE HALF SCALEDRAWING INDEXT-1 TITLE SHEETSHEET TITLEC-1T-2A-2 ELEVATIONSGENERAL NOTES TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYAREA MAPSVICINITY MAPLOCATION MAPDRIVING DIRECTIONSNENESESWWNWSPROJECT DESCRIPTIONSITE NAME: HBNPB_038AKnow what'sbelow.Callbefore you dig.Dig AlertCALIFORNIA SOUTHCall Two Working Days Before You Dig!811 / 800-422-4133A-3 ELEVATIONSTHE FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. A TECHNICIAN WILLVISIT THE SITE AS REQUIRED FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE. THE PROJECT WILL NOTRESULT IN ANY SIGNIFICANT DISTURBANCE OR EFFECT ON DRAINAGE; NO SANITARYSEWER SERVICE, POTABLE WATER, OR TRASH DISPOSAL IS REQUIRED AND NOCOMMERCIAL SIGNAGE IS NEW.DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGSSUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS & EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ONTHE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANYDISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME.APPROVALSAT&T RF ENGINEER:SITE ACQUISITION MANAGER:PROJECT MANAGER:ZONING VENDOR:A/E MANAGER:LEASING VENDOR:CONSTRUCTION MANAGER:PROPERTY OWNER:APPROVED BY:INITIALS: DATE:AT&T OPERATIONS:THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HEREBY APPROVE AND ACCEPT THESE DOCUMENTS & AUTHORIZETHE SUBCONTRACTOR TO PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBED HEREIN. ALLDOCUMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT & MAY IMPOSECHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS.D-2 DETAILSSHEET NO:SITE NUMBER: CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_038USID: 188496/ FA: 14807366SITE ADDRESS: CITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4653,NORTH SIDE OF BAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900' N OFEL PASEO DRIVE, CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92660PACE: MRLOS045180NENESESWWNWSD-1 DETAILS ELECTRICAL & GROUNDING DETAILSE-1 POLE DETAILSS-1POLE ID #: SLC4653PROJECT: CRAN/ SMALL CELL/ PICOPOLE TYPE: (N) CONCRETE LIGHT POLEUTILITY MANAGER:ENGINEER:M SQUARED WIRELESS1387 CALLE AVANZADOSAN CLEMENTE, CA 92673PUBLIC/PRIVATE:AT&T1452 EDINGER AVETUSTIN, CA 92780-117.88646633.609029APPLICANT:ADDRESS:LAT/LONG TYPE:LONGITUDE (NAD 83):LATITUDE (NAD 83):NAD-83PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYADDRESS:CITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4653, NORTHSIDE OF BAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900' NOF EL PASEO DRIVE,CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92660PROJECT MANAGER:M SQUARED WIRELESS1387 CALLE AVANZADOSAN CLEMENTE, CA 92673GROUND ELEVATION (NAVD 88)±14.46'JURISDICTION:CITY OF CORONA DEL MARSAC/ZONING/PERMITTING:M SQUARED WIRELESS1387 CALLE AVANZADOSAN CLEMENTE, CA 92673RF ENGINEER:AT&T1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92618CONTACT: KARLO DAVINAGRACIAEMAIL: KD270J@ATT.COMUNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONSPROPOSED USE:CURRENT ZONING:PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYPOWER COMPANY:ADDRESS:A-4 SITE IMAGESCE1 INNOVATION WAYPOMONA, CA 91768AT&T PROPOSES TO INSTALL A NEW WIRELESS INSTALLATION LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTOF WAY TO (N) CONCRETE LIGHT POLE.4G SCOPE WILL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING:* AT&T TO REMOVE (1) EXISTING CORONA DEL MAR CONCRETE STREETLIGHT* AT&T TO INSTALL (1) CONCRETE STREETLIGHT* AT&T TO INSTALL (4) NEW AT&T REMOTE RADIO UNITS* AT&T TO INSTALL (1) NEW AT&T OMNI-DIRECTIONAL ANTENNA* AT&T TO INSTALL (1) NEW AT&T EQUIPMENT SHROUD* AT&T TO INSTALL (1) NEW RAYCAP DISCONNECT* AT&T TO INSTALL (1) NEW HANDHOLELATITUDE/LONGITUDE: 33.609029/ -117.886466SENIOR TECHNICAL PROJECT MANAGER:AT&T1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92618CONTACT: TED SUEKAWAEMAIL: TS4994@ATT.COMSI5&SI5&DIRECTIONS FROM AT&T OFFICE:DIRECTION ARE TAKEN FROM1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 927801. TURN LEFT ONTO EDINGER AVE2. TURN LEFT ONTO 55 S3. TAKE EXIT 5A TOWARD STATE ROUTE 734. TAKE EXIT 15 TOWARD JAMBOREE RD5. TURN RIGHT ONTO JAMBOREE RD6. TURN LEFT ONTO BAYSIDE DRCODE COMPLIANCEALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THELOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BECONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES.1. 2016 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE2. 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE3. 2016 CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC CODE4. 2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE5. 2016 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE6. 2016 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE7. ANY LOCAL BUILDING CODE AMENDMENTS TO THE ABOVE8. CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES9. NEC, NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE10. CALIFORNIA TRAFFIC CONTROL LANE CLOSURES MUTCDHANDICAP REQUIREMENTS:FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESSNOT REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE STATE CODEPART 2, TITLE 24, CHAPTER 11B, SECTION 1103B.D-3 NEWPORT BEACH DETAILS TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANTCP-1SHEET TITLESHEET NO:SCE-3SCE-1 SCE FINAL DESIGNSCE-2 SCE FINAL DESIGN SCE FINAL DESIGND-4 LUMINAIRE SPECIFICATIONGN-1 GENERAL NOTESA-1 SITE PLAN 1-A ACCURACY CERTIFICATION ADAPTER PLATE DETAILSS-2 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANTCP-2 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANTCP-3CITY NOTECONCRETE FOUNDATION (CONTINUOUS INSPECTION).SPECIAL INSPECTION1. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND NEW TCP WILLBE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED AS PART OF THE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.81 1-A ACCURACYCERTIFICATIONT-2SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 9278082 GENERAL NOTESGN-1SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISEDDATE SIGNED: 03/09/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/20211452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780ABBREVIATIONSGENERAL NOTESABBREVIATIONS431NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL NOTES283 CLBAYSIDE DRIVECLEL PASEO DR IVECL BAYSIDE DRIVEVICINITY MAPSiteGRAPHIC SCALEFEETLEGENDSITE SURVEYTOPOGRAPHICSURVEYCRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_038CITY STREETLIGHT NO. SLC4653, NORTHSIDE OF BAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY900' NORTH OF EL PASEO DRIVEREVDESCRIPTIONDATEBYC-1CHARLES L. SCOTT III, PLS 8742EXP.12/31/2020 Registration No. in the State of California.ERICSSON330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602BASIS OF BEARINGS DATE OF SURVEYLEGAL DESCRIPTIONASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.TITLE REPORTBENCH MARKEASEMENT NOTES:SURVEYOR'S NOTES:STREET LIGHT POLE PROFILESite Detail84 A-1SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A 11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI03/09/2020 100% CD'S REVISEDDATE SIGNED: 03/09/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/20211452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780BAYSIDE DR.SITE PLANNENESESWWNWSENLARGED SITE PLANNENESESWWNWS21(E) TREE (TYP.)(E) DRIVEWAY (TYP.)SITE PLANBUILDING(TYP.)NEW AT&T PROJECT LOCATION.SEE ENLARGED SITE PLANRESIDENTIALPROPERTYPARKINGLOTC/FCLROW (E) STREETLIGHT (TYP.)1-2A-31-2A-22-C/FROW C/FCLROW70'-0"24'-1"±330'-0"FROM ℄ OF (N) POLE TO ℄ OF EL PASEO DR.PARKINGLOT70'-0"10'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 10'-0"C/FROW(E) SIDEWALK (TYP.)2'-4"C/F CL ROW C/F ROW BAYSIDE DR.NOTE:1. IF DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON PLAN DO NOT SCALE CORRECTLY, CHECK FOR REDUCTIONOR ENLARGEMENT FROM ORIGINAL PLANS.2. CONTRACTORS TO VERIFY SUB STRUCTURE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION.3. ALL CONDUCTORS/ WIRES & CONDUIT, SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A NEAT & TIDY FASHION.ALL EXCESS WIRE SLACK IS TO BE REMOVED & HIDDEN AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.4. ALL NEWLY INSTALLED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING POLE, &OR SURROUNDINGS UNLESS PROHIBITED PER MANUFACTURER.5. NEW FIBER CONDUIT TO BE STUBBED OUT OF NEW POLE FOOTING BY APPROX. 2'-0".6. POWER SUPPLY AND RUN ARE PER SCE FINAL DESIGN.7. WHERE REMOVED OR DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION, ALL, CURB, GUTTER ANDSIDEWALK SHALL BE REPLACED IN ENTIRE SECTIONS BETWEEN EXPANSION JOINTS.8. ALL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR REPLACEMENT SECTIONS SHALL BE PER CITY OFNEWPORT BEACH STANDARD DRAWINGS.(E) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CONCRETESTREETLIGHT (SLC4653) TO BE REMOVED &REPLACED W/ (N) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACHCONCRETE STREETLIGHT W/ (E) EQUIPMENTAT SAME LOCATION (BY AT&T)(E) VAULT(E) PARKWAY (TYP.)(E) SIDEWALK (TYP.)(E) PARKWAY (TYP.)(E) CATCH BASINEXISTING 6"Ø WATER SUBSTRUCTURE LINE±19'-0" NE / ℄ BAYSIDE DRIVE(E) SLOPE1/4" / FTCLC/FROWC/FROW 6'-0"2'-10"3'-0"25'-0"45'-0"CL C/F ROW ROW NOTE:1. REPAINT THE PAINTED CURBS IF DAMAGED OR IFDETRMINED NECESSARY BY THE PUBLIC WORKSINSPECTOR.2. PROTECT THE EXISTING STREET TREE ANDCATCH BASIN IN PLACE.EXISTING ELECTRIC SUBSTRUCTURE LINEVARIES. S / C/FEXISTING 36"Ø WASTEWATER SUBSTRUCTURELINE ±5'-9" S / ℄ OF BAYSIDE DR.EXISTING GAS SUBSTRUCTURE LINE ±3'-10"S / C/F; 3'-2" DEEP(E) TREE (TYP.)(E) CATCH BASIN24'-1"21'-9"1'-7"6'-1"5'-3"21'-3"1/4" / FT2%MAX(E) SLOPE(E) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACHCONCRETE STREETLIGHT(SLC4653) TO BE REMOVED &REPLACED IN SAME LOCATIONW/ (N) CONCRETE STREETLIGHTW/ (N) EQUIPMENT1S-11-5D-1(N) U/G FIBER RUN FROM (N)FIBER HANDHOLE TO (N)CONCRETE STREETLIGHT (BYAT&T); SEE NOTE 61,5D-3(N) FIBER HANDHOLE TO BE INSTALLEDBELOW GRADE (BY AT&T WIRELINEUNDER SEPARATE PERMIT)7D-1(E) LANDSCAPERESIDENTIALPROPERTY(E) U/G SCE VAULT # V5365154AND PROPOSED POWER P.O.C.,SEE NOTE 7(1) Ø 3" PROPOSED ±52' U/G POWER RUN;TRENCHED OR BORED FROM (E) SCEVAULT #V5365154 TO (N) H154A HANDHOLE(BY AT&T), SEE NOTE 7 (BY AT&T)(N) ±30'-0" U/G POWER RUN FROM (N)H154A HANDHOLE (BY AT&T) TO (N)WTR HANDHOLE (BY AT&T)3-5D-3(N) H154A HAND HOLE TO BE INSTALLEDBELOW GRADE (BY AT&T)7D-1BAYSIDE DR.(N) ±81'-0" U/G POWER RUN BOREFROM (N) WTR HAND HOLE (BY AT&T)TO (N) STREETLIGHT(N) WTR HAND HOLE TO BE INSTALLEDBELOW GRADE (BY AT&T)6'-5"(E) DRIVEWAY (TYP.)3-5D-323'-3"FROM ℄ OF (N) POLETO ℄ OF BAYSIDE DR.(E) VAULT45'-0"25'-0"20'-11"19'-1"5'-11"40'-0"EL PASEO DR.C/F5'-0"-SCE-1-SCE-13,5D-33'-0"5'-0"MIN8'-0" LIMITS TO WORK48'-6"LIMITS TO WORK59'-0" LIMITS TO WORK 50'-0"LIMITS TO WORK18'-5"7-9D-1-SCE-15'-0"35'-7"(E) CATVHANDHOLE(E) CATCHBASIN(E) UTILITY(E) UTILITY(E) HANDHOLE(TYP.)(E) UTILITY(E) UTILITY20'-11"19'-1"5'-11"(N) 3'X5' BORE PIT(N) 3'X5' BORE PIT85 Ple ase Re fer ence S it e IDPhone : (877 ) 231 -544 7E-m ai l : at tt ower s@a t t .com In cas e o f Em erg enc y Co nta ctAT&T TOWERSSite IDFCC IDStay BackRadio-frequency energymay exceed exposure limi ts. If ques t ions , con tac t fac il it y owne r.SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISEDDATE SIGNED: 03/09/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/20211452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780ELEVATIONSA-212NEW NORTHWEST ELEVATIONEXISTING NORTHWEST ELEVATION(E) CORONA DEL MAR CONCRETE STREETLIGHT(SLC4653) TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED (BY AT&T)±19'-4" A.G.L.B/ OF (E) POLE ARM±0'-0" A.G.L.(E) GROUND LEVEL±25'-5" A.G.L.B/ OF (N) ANTENNA±27'-5" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) ANTENNA±26'-5" A.G.L.C/L OF (N) ANTENNA±25'-5" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) EQUIPMENT SHROUD±22'-0" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) POLE±22'-0" A.G.L.B/ OF (N) EQUIPMENT SHROUD±20'-6" A.G.L.C/L OF (E) LUMINAIRE(E) POLE FOUNDATION TO BEREMOVED & REPLACED (BY AT&T)NOTE:1. ALL NEW EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PAINTEDTO MATCH (E) CONCRETE LIGHT POLE2. RE-USE (E) LED LUMINAIRE. IF NOT LED,REPLACE WITH (N) LED LUMINAIREAPPROVED BY THE CITY.±9" Ø @ 40"A.G.L±914" Ø @ 40" A.G.LC/F ROW21'-2"1'-7"ROW ±18'-9" A.G.L.TOP OF FUTURE BANNER2'-6"8'-0"(E) SLOPE1/4" / FT(E) SLOPE1/4" / FT±18'-8" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) R/F SIGNAGE±20'-6" A.G.L.C/L OF (N) LUMINAIRE±5'-0" A.G.L.B/ OF CONTACT INFO SIGN(E) LUMINAIRE TO BE RELOCATED(E) LANDSCAPE, TYP.±21'-1" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) LUMINAIRE SENSOR±0'-0" A.G.L.(E) GROUND LEVEL6'-0"2'-6"(N) ANTENNA MOUNTED ON (N)EQUIPMENT SHROUD(N) EQUIPMENT SHROUD W/ (2) (N) AT&T2203 RADIO, (1) (N) 2205 RADIOS (1)FUTURE 2205 RADIO & (1) (N) RAYCAPDISCONNECT SWITCH WITHIN SHROUD2-5D-11D-1RE-USE (E) LED LUMINAIRE,SEE NOTE 2--D-4(N) ANTENNA SIGN2D-2FUTURE BANNER &BRACKET LOCATION(BY OTHERS)5D-2(N) NEWPORT BEACH CONCRETESTREETLIGHT TO MATCH EXISTINGSTANDARD (SLC4653) (BY AT&T)-S-1(N) EMERGENCYCONTACT SIGN2D-2(N) POLE FOUNDATION (BY AT&T)7D-1(N) FIBER BOX (BY OTHERS)(N) U/G FIBER RUN FROM (N) FIBERHAND HOLE TO (N) CONCRETESTREETLIGHT (BY AT&T);1D-2(E) LANDSCAPE,TYP.21'-2"2"1'-7"C/F ±19'-10" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) POLE4'-4"±21'-1" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) LUMINAIRE SENSOR4'-0"4'-0"(N) ADAPTER PLATE-S-21'-6"(N) U/G POWER RUN TO WTRHANDHOLE± 3'-2"± 4'-0"4D-3±10'-9" A.G.L.BOTTOM OF FUTURE BANNER86 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISEDDATE SIGNED: 03/09/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/20211452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780ELEVATIONSA-312NEW SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONEXISTING SOUTHWEST ELEVATION±0'-0" A.G.L.(E) GROUND LEVEL±0'-0" A.G.L.(E) GROUND LEVEL(N) ANTENNA MOUNTED ON (N)EQUIPMENT SHROUD(N) FIBER BOX (BY AT&T)(N) EQUIPMENT SHROUD W/ (2) (N) AT&T2203 RADIO, (1) (N) 2205 RADIOS (1)FUTURE 2205 RADIO & (1) (N) RAYCAPDISCONNECT SWITCH WITHIN SHROUD1D-12-5D-1(N) NEWPORT BEACH CONCRETESTREETLIGHT TO MATCHEXISTING STANDARD (SLC4653)(BY AT&T)(N) POLE FOUNDATION (BY AT&T)-S-1(E) POLE FOUNDATION TO BEREMOVED & REPLACED (BY AT&T)(E) CORONA DEL MAR CONCRETE STREETLIGHT(SLC4653) TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED (BY AT&T)±19'-10" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) POLE±20'-6" A.G.L.C/L OF (E) LUMINAIRE±25'-5" A.G.L.B/ OF (N) ANTENNA±27'-5" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) ANTENNA±26'-5" A.G.L.C/L OF (N) ANTENNA±25'-5" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) EQUIPMENT SHROUD±22'-0" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) POLE±22'-0" A.G.L.B/ OF (N) EQUIPMENT SHROUD±20'-6" A.G.L.C/L OF (N) LUMINAIRE(N) 1 14" PVC U/G CONDUIT FIBER RUNFROM (N) FIBER HANDHOLE TO (N)CONCRETE STREETLIGHT (BY AT&T);RE-USE (E) LED LUMINAIRE,SEE NOTE 2(N) EMERGENCYCONTACT SIGN(N) ANTENNA SIGN2D-22D-21D-2±9"Ø @ 40" A.G.L±914" Ø @ 40" A.G.L1'-6"4'-5"±10'-9" A.G.L.BOTTOM OF FUTURE BANNER±18'-9" A.G.L.TOP OF FUTURE BANNERFUTURE BANNER &BRACKET LOCATION(BY OTHERS)2'-6"6'-0"±18'-8" A.G.L.T/ OF (N) R/F SIGNAGE±5'-0" A.G.L.B/ OF CONTACT INFO SIGN5D-2(E) LANDSCAPE, TYP.(E) LANDSCAPE, TYP.(E) LUMINAIRE TO BE RELOCATED--D-4±21'-1" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) LUMINARIE SENSOR7D-1±19'-4" A.G.L.B/ OF (E) POLE ARM±21'-1" A.G.L.T/ OF (E) LUMINAIRE SENSOR4'-4"(N) ADAPTER PLATE-S-2(N) ATT FIBER CONDUIT 18" BELOWGRADE(N) U/G POWER RUN TO WTRHANDHOLE(N) WTR BOX & DISCONNECTBELOW GRADE (BY AT&T)7-9D-1TO SCE POWER UTILITY(N) STAINLESS STEEL GROUND ROD±35'-0"4D-3NOTE:1. ALL NEW EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PAINTEDTO MATCH (E) CONCRETE LIGHT POLE2. RE-USE (E) LED LUMINAIRE. IF NOT LED,REPLACE WITH (N) LED LUMINAIREAPPROVED BY THE CITY.(E) STREETLIGHT POWER BOX ( VERIFYEXACT LOCATION ON FIELD)1'-6"1 14" PVC CONDUITTO SCE POWER UTILITY87 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780SITE IMAGEA-41NEW SITE LOCATION LOOKING NORTHEAST(E) STREETLIGHT TO BEREPLACED IN SAMELOCATION88 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISEDDATE SIGNED: 03/09/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/20211452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780DETAILSD-1DIMENSIONS (WxDxH):7.87"x3.94"x7.87", INCLUDING MOUNTINGBRACKET AND ESTHETIC FRONT COVERERICSSON - MICRO RADIO 2203MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONSVOLUME AND WEIGHT:4 LITRES AND < 4.5 kg (9.92 lbs)MOUNTING:WALL AND POLE MOUNTINTERFACE SPECIFICATIONS:ANTENNA PORTS:2 x 4.3-10(F)EXTERNAL ALARM:2POWER SUPPLY:-48 VCD OR 100 -250 VACELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS:CPRI:2 x 2.5/5/10 Gbps (EXCHANGEABLE SFPMODULES)OPTICAL INDICATORS:6FIELD GROUND:17.87"7.87"FRONTSIDETOP7.87"3.94"3.94" 7.87"BACK7.87"7.87"ERICSSONPOWER OUTPUT:97 WATTS MAXMAX HEAT DISSIPATION: 90 WATTSMINIMUM AC FUSE RATING: 6 AMPDIMENSIONS (HxD):MAX WIND SPEED:NO. OF CONNECTORSWEIGHT EXCL MOUNTING BRACKETS:CONNECTOR TYPE &FREQUENCY BAND [MHz]:24.9 x 10 INCHES(643 x 255 mm)150 mph10 X 4.3-10 DIN FEMALE17.2lbs (9 kg)4 X 4.3-10 DIN FEMALE(1695-2360) MHzMECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONSRADOME MATERIAL:ASASHIPPING DIMS (LxWxD):30"X19"X19" (762x483x483)mm24.9"10.0"1.0"142.5"GALTRONICS GQ2410-06621 PSEUDO OMNI CANISTER ANTENNA4 X 4.3-10 DIN FEMALE(3550-3700) MHz2 X 4.3-10 DIN FEMALE(5150-5950) MHzGROSS SHIPPING WEIGHT:26 lbs (12kg)FRONTBOTTOMPART NO. GQ2410-06621-11 (GRAY)PART NO. GQ2410-06621-611 (BROWN)PART NO. GQ2410-06621-B11 (CHROME)RAYCAP - RSCAC-6533-P-120-DBOTTOMSIDE8.59"10.28"5.06"M40 GLANDS CAN BE REPLACED BY 11/4 " NPT CONDUIT FITTINGSNPT 1" GLAND CAN BE REPLACED BYCONDUIT FITTING6.25"7.46"FRONT10.45" 8.61"MECHANICALSURGE PROTECTION DEVICE (SPD) TYPE TO UL: STRIKESORB 30-ANUMBER OF CIRCUITS PROTECTED: 4SURGE PROTECTIVE DEVICE (SPD) TYPE PER UL 1449 4TH EDITION:TYPE 2 COMPONENT ASSEMBLYSURGE PROTECTION DEVICE (SPD) CLASS TO IEC 61643-11: CLASS IINOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE [UN]: 120 VNOMINAL DISCHARGE CURRENT [IN] PER UL 1449 4TH EDITION: 20 KA 8/20 ΜSMAXIMUM DISCHARGE CURRENT [IMAX] PER IEC 61643-11 60 KA 8/20 ΜSMAXIMUM CONTINUOUS OPERATING VOLTAGE [UC] (MCOV) 150VVOLTAGE PROTECTION LEVEL [UP] PER IEC 61643-11: 700VVOLTAGE PROTECTION RATING (VPR): 20 KA 8/20SUPPRESSION TECHNOLOGY: MOVPROTECTION MODES (DUAL MODE): LINE TO NEUTRAL, NEUTRAL TO GROUNDCONNECTION TERMINAL: COMPRESSION LUG #6 - #14 AWG (13 - 2MM2)TERMINAL BLOCK #10-#26 AWG (6 - 0.14MM2)ENVIRONMENTAL INGRESS PROTECTION (IP) RATING: NEMA 4XOPERATION TEMPERATURE: (°C) -40° C TO +80° CSTORAGE TEMPERATURE: (°C) -70° C TO +80° CENCLOSURE TYPE (OUTDOOR) POLYCARBONATE: UL 94V-0 RATEDENCLOSURE DIMENSION: (L × W × H) 8.58" X 5.06" X 10.08"[217 × 128 × 256 MM]WEIGHT: 2.25 LBS [1.02KG]STRIKESORB MODULES ARE COMPLIANT TO THE FOLLOWING SURGE PROTECTIVE DEVICE (SPD) STANDARDS:UL 1449 4TH EDITION: 2011, IEC 61643-11: 2011, EN 61643-11: 2012, IEEE C62.11: 2005, IEEE C62.41: 2002, IEEE C62.45:2002, NEMA-LS-1 CERTIFICATION UL, VDE, CEELECTRICALAVAILABLE FROM EXCEL SIGN AND DECAL:http://www.weneedsigns.com/home.php?cal+1135 AND CLICK ON AT&TPH: 510-651-0445N01-DC-16 1"X6" NOTICE DECAL"For 1 Foot Distance" VINYL DECAL WITH ADHEDSIVE BACKINGNOTICERF energy emitted by this device may exceed the FCC's generalpublic exposure limits. Stay at least 1 foot away from the device.Call 800-638-2822 for help if you need access within 1 footPlace 3 NOTICE sticker at the bottom of the front ofthe radome of each antenna.COVER FEATURES:·STANDARD LOAD RATING: 20,800 LBS. WHEEL LOADON 10"x20" PLATE·2 BOLT DOWN LOCATIONS·STAINLESS STEEL BOX INSERTS·POLYMER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION·NON-SKID SURFACE STANDARD·20K TO BE EMBOSSED ON COVER·APPROXIMATE WEIGHT = 120 LBS.COVER FEATURES:·POLYMER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION·LIGHTWEIGHT·STACKABLE FOOT·APPROX. WEIGHT 188 LBS.NON-SKID(STANDARD)2"x8" NAMEPLATERECESS (1 PL)LIFT PINS (2 PL)ANTI THEFT, TAMPER RESISTANTHARDWARE BOLT DOWNS (2 PL)3/8"x3" HEX BOLT(2 PL EA END)(OR APPROVED EQUAL)ERICSSON - RADIO 2203GALTRONICS OMNI ANTENNARAYCAP DISCONNECTOMNI ANTENNA DISCLAIMER LABELAT&T MOBILITY FUSED DISCONNECTHANDHOLE(2) ERICSSON 2203MOUNTING - BOTH SIDESRAYCAP POSITION ACLOADCENTER OVP (OPTIONAL)TOPFRONTBOTTOM41.3"Ø12"DIMENSIONS (WxDxH):41.3"xØ12"COMMSCOPE SCC-760236966MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONSWEIGHT:58 LBS. (26KG)MOUNTING:MOUNTS TO TOP OF POLEERICSSON - RADIO 2205EQUIPMENT SHROUDDIMENSIONS (WxDxH):7.87"x4.84"x7.87", INCLUDING MOUNTINGBRACKET AND ESTHETIC FRONT COVERERICSSON - MICRO RADIO 2205MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONSVOLUME AND WEIGHT:4 LITRES AND < 4 kg (8.82 lbs)MOUNTING:WALL AND POLE MOUNTINTERFACE SPECIFICATIONS:ANTENNA PORTS:2 x 4.3-10(F)EXTERNAL ALARM:2POWER SUPPLY:-48 VCD OR 100 -250 VACELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS:CPRI:2 x 2.5/5/10 Gbps (EXCHANGEABLE SFPMODULES)OPTICAL INDICATORS:6FIELD GROUND:17.87"7.87"FRONTSIDETOP7.87"4.84"4.84" 7.87"BACK7.87"7.87"ERICSSONPOWER OUTPUT:97 WATTS MAXMAX HEAT DISSIPATION: 90 WATTSMINIMUM AC FUSE RATING: 6 AMP2-6-SCE UN-METERED FUSED PANEL5714963281106254798389 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISEDDATE SIGNED: 03/09/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/20211452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780DETAILSD-2POLE MOUNTED SIGNSNOT USEDNOT USED25134ANTENNA SIGNAGEEMERGENCY CONTACT SIGN5"8"Please Reference Site IDPhone: (877) 231-5447E-mail: atttowers@att.comIn case of Emergency ContactAT&T TOWERSSite IDFCC ID5"4"Stay BackRadio-frequency energymay exceed exposure limits.If questions, contact facility owner.GC TO ADD OWNER INFORMATIONDECAL TO SIGNPhone: (877) 231-5447E-mail: atttowers@att.comWINDBREAKER BRACKET SYSTEMSTREETLIGHT POLESTEEL BANDING KIT W/ BANNERARM TYP.TOP & BOTTOMTO COMPLY WITH CITY BANNERPOLICY L-16, WIND LOAD 90MPH(FUTURE BY OTHERS)BANNERANTI-GRAFFITI COATING ON SIGNANTI-GRAFFITICOATING ON SIGNNEW FOUNDATION90 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISEDDATE SIGNED: 03/09/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/20211452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780CITY OF NEWPORTDETAILSD-3NOT USEDNOT USEDSIDEWALK DETAILTRENCH RESURFACINGROADWAY TRENCHMORATORIUM TRENCHPARKWAY TRENCH21436587LUMINAIRE ATTACHMENTBACK VIEWBOTTOM VIEWNOTE:SECURLY TIGHTEN BOLTS TO19.7 FT-LBS BY ALTERMATINGFROM BOLTS TO BOLTS INEQUAL MEASURED AMOUNTS OF25% TORQUE TO AVOIDCROSS-THREADING-D-491 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780CITY OF NEWPORTLUMINAIRESPECIFICATIONSD-4FOR REFERENCE ONLY92 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780POLE DETAILSS-1FOR REFERENCE ONLYPOLE DETAIL193 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780ADAPTER PLATEDETAILSS-2FOR REFERENCE ONLYADAPTER PLATE DETAIL194 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISEDDATE SIGNED: 03/09/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/20211452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780ELECTRICAL DETAILSE-1PICO PLUMBING DIAGRAM······NOT USEDSINGLE LINE DIAGRAMGROUNDING SCHEMATICSTRIKESORB 120VPROTECTIONDISCONNECT SWITCHCONNECTION FOR POWER INJUMPER GROUNDCONNECTIONS7 AMP CIRCUIT BREAKERSCHASSIS GROUND CONNECTIONDEAD -FRONT FOR LIVECOMPONENTSBREAKER SCHEDULE5D-1ERICSSONERICSSON2D-15D-12D-11D-1ERICSSON4D-14D-1ERICSSON9D-18D-19D-18D-1246135NOTES1A-21A-35D-11A-21A-395 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780ELECTRICAL DETAILSSCE-1FOR REFERENCE ONLYFINAL POWER196 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780ELECTRICAL DETAILSSCE-2FOR REFERENCE ONLYFINAL POWER197 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISED1452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780ELECTRICAL DETAILSSCE-3FOR REFERENCE ONLYFINAL POWER198 85'-0"BIKE TAPER250'-0"250'-0"250'-0"ROADWORKAHEADENDROAD WORKROADWORKAHEAD50'-0"SHOULDERWORKAHEAD1 2 'ENDROAD WORK TEMP. NO PARKINGTRAFFIC CONTROLPLANTC-1SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISEDDATE SIGNED: 03/09/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/20211452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN1NOTES:1. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THECALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (2014 CALIFORNIA MUTCD)AND THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION.2. THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE HAS THE AUTHORITY TO INITIATEFIELD CHANGES TO ASSURE PUBLIC SAFETY.3. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED FROM VIEW WHEN NOT IN USE.4. WORK HOURS SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE PERIOD BETWEEN 7:00 A.M. AND 5:00 P.M.,MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, UNLESS APPROVED OTHERWISE. WHEN NIGHT WORK ISREQUIRED, WORK HOURS SHALL BE 9:00 P.M. TO 5:00 A.M. SUNDAY THROUGH FRIDAY.5. TRENCHES MUST BE BACK FILLED OR PLATED DURING NON-WORKING HOURS.6. PEDESTRIAN CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.7. TEMPORARY "NO PARKING SIGNS" SHALL BE POSTED 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCINGWORK IN ALL PARKING ZONES.8. ACCESS TO DRIVEWAYS WILL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES UNLESS OTHER ARRANGEMENTSARE MADE.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE WITHIN 72 HOURS ALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOOP DETECTORSDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION.10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE WITHIN 24 HOURS, ALL STRIPING, REMOVED OR DAMAGEDBY CONSTRUCTION WORK. (STRIPING MAY BE REPLACED TEMPORARILY WITH TAPE.)11. ALL WORKERS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN ORANGE VEST (OR A REFLECTIVE VEST ATNIGHT). ALL FLAGGERS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A HARD HAT, C28 "STOP/SLOW" PADDLE ANDSHALL BE TRAINED IN THE PROPER FUNDAMENTALS OF FLAGGING TRAFFIC.12. ANY WORK THAT DISTURBS NORMAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS SHALL BE COORDINATEDWITH THE CITY 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL TRAFFIC DEVICES 24 HOURS PER DAY AND 7 DAYSPER WEEK.14. A MINIMUM OF 10' TRAVEL LANES MUST BE MAINTAINED UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED THECITY.15. ALL NIGHT WORK WILL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY. LANE CLOSURES, ROADDETOURS, AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH OVERNIGHTCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WILL REQUIRE WARNING SIGNS BE PLACED AT LEAST ONE WEEKIN ADVANCE OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION.16. A SOLAR POWERED FLASHING ARROW BOARD SHALL BE REQUIRED ON ALL ARTERIAL STREETLANE CLOSURES.17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY TRANSIT AUTHORITY IN ADVANCE AND PROVIDETEMPORARY RELOCATED BUS STOPS.18. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN COMPLIES WITH 2016 WATCHBOOK REQUIREMENTS.TYPE I BARRICADE W/PROPOSED SIGNSFLASHING ARROW SIGNCHANNELIZING DEVICEHIGH LEVEL WARNING DEVICEW/ PROPOSED SIGNPROPOSED SIGN AND POSTTYPE I BARRICADETYPE III BARRICADETYPE III BARRICADE W/PROPOSED SIGNSSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONCONSTRUCTION AREAFLAGGERLEGENDMINIMUM RECOMMENDEDDELINEATOR/CONE & SIGN PLACEMENTTABLE 6H-4FORMULAS BASED ON 12' WIDE LANES:40 MPH OR LESS L=WS²/6045 MPH OR MORE L=WSL FOR MERGE TAPER1/2L FOR SHIFT TAPER1/3L FOR SHOULDER TAPERPOSTEDSPEED LIMITTAPER LENGTH "L"EACH LANEDELINEATOR SPACINGTAPER TANGENT180 FT245 FT320 FT540 FT600 FT660 FT720 FT780 FT125 FT60 FT70 FT80 FT100 FT100 FT100 FT100 FT100 FT50 FT30 FT35 FT40 FT50 FT50 FT50 FT50 FT50 FT25 FT25 MPH30 MPH35 MPH40 MPH45 MPH50 MPH55 MPH60 MPH65 MPHN E N E SE SWWNW S PHASE 1CITY NOTE1. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND NEW TCP WILLBE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED AS PART OF THE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.99 250'-0" MERGING TAPER250'-0"250'-0"250'-0"ROADWORKAHEADLEFT LANECLOSEDAHEADENDROAD WORK TEMP. NO PARKING245'-0" MERGING TAPER250'250'250'-0" MERGING TAPERENDROAD WORKLANECLOSED TEMP. NO PARKING250'250'ROADWORKAHEADROAD WORKLEFT LANECLOSEDAHEADTRAFFIC CONTROLPLANTC-2SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISEDDATE SIGNED: 03/09/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/20211452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN1TYPE I BARRICADE W/PROPOSED SIGNSFLASHING ARROW SIGNCHANNELIZING DEVICEHIGH LEVEL WARNING DEVICEW/ PROPOSED SIGNPROPOSED SIGN AND POSTTYPE I BARRICADETYPE III BARRICADETYPE III BARRICADE W/PROPOSED SIGNSSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONCONSTRUCTION AREAFLAGGERLEGENDMINIMUM RECOMMENDEDDELINEATOR/CONE & SIGN PLACEMENTTABLE 6H-4FORMULAS BASED ON 12' WIDE LANES:40 MPH OR LESS L=WS²/6045 MPH OR MORE L=WSL FOR MERGE TAPER1/2L FOR SHIFT TAPER1/3L FOR SHOULDER TAPERPOSTEDSPEED LIMITTAPER LENGTH "L"EACH LANEDELINEATOR SPACINGTAPERTANGENT180 FT245 FT320 FT540 FT600 FT660 FT720 FT780 FT125 FT60 FT70 FT80 FT100 FT100 FT100 FT100 FT100 FT50 FT30 FT35 FT40 FT50 FT50 FT50 FT50 FT50 FT25 FT25 MPH30 MPH35 MPH40 MPH45 MPH50 MPH55 MPH60 MPH65 MPHN E N E SE SWWNW S PHASE 2SEE MATCHLINE A B E L OW S E E M A T C H L I N E " A " A B O V E SEE MATCHLINE "B" RIGHT S E E M A T C H L I N E " B " R I G H T CITY NOTE1. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND NEW TCP WILLBE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED AS PART OF THE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.100 250'-0" MERGING TAPER250'-0"250'-0"250'-0"ROADWORKAHEADLEFT LANECLOSEDAHEADENDROAD WORK TEMP. NO PARKING125'-0" SHIFTING TAPER250'250'250'ROADWORKAHEADENDROAD WORKTRAFFIC CONTROLPLANTC-3SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEYARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MMEGSITE ID: HBNPB_038ACITY STREETLIGHT NO.SLC4653, NORTH SIDE OFBAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROX 900'N OF EL PASEO DRIVECORONA DEL MAR, CA, 92660330 COMMERCE, STE. 200IRVINE, CA 92602A11/19/2017 90% CONSTRUCTIONREV DATE DESCRIPTIONB 12/08/2017 95% CONSTRUCTIONC 12/15/2017 100% CONSTRUCTIOND 03/14/2019 REVISIONE 09/16/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDF 11/15/2019 100% CD'D REVISEDG 12/06/2019100% CONSTRUCTIONH 01/02/2020 CITY COMMENTSI 03/09/2020100% CD'S REVISEDDATE SIGNED: 03/09/2020EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/20211452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CA 92780TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN1TYPE I BARRICADE W/PROPOSED SIGNSFLASHING ARROW SIGNCHANNELIZING DEVICEHIGH LEVEL WARNING DEVICEW/ PROPOSED SIGNPROPOSED SIGN AND POSTTYPE I BARRICADETYPE III BARRICADETYPE III BARRICADE W/PROPOSED SIGNSSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONCONSTRUCTION AREAFLAGGERLEGENDMINIMUM RECOMMENDEDDELINEATOR/CONE & SIGN PLACEMENTTABLE 6H-4FORMULAS BASED ON 12' WIDE LANES:40 MPH OR LESS L=WS²/6045 MPH OR MORE L=WSL FOR MERGE TAPER1/2L FOR SHIFT TAPER1/3L FOR SHOULDER TAPERPOSTEDSPEED LIMITTAPER LENGTH "L"EACH LANEDELINEATOR SPACINGTAPER TANGENT180 FT245 FT320 FT540 FT600 FT660 FT720 FT780 FT125 FT60 FT70 FT80 FT100 FT100 FT100 FT100 FT100 FT50 FT30 FT35 FT40 FT50 FT50 FT50 FT50 FT50 FT25 FT25 MPH30 MPH35 MPH40 MPH45 MPH50 MPH55 MPH60 MPH65 MPHN E N E SE SWWNW S PHASE 3SEE MATCHLINE "C" LEFTSEE MATCHLINE "C" ABOVE RIGHTCITY NOTE1. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND NEW TCP WILLBE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED AS PART OF THE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.101 From:Nikki Leeper To:Planning Commissioners Subject:ATT small cell towers Date:Saturday, October 17, 2020 7:09:03 AM [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commissioners, I am strongly against allowing these small cell towers into our neighborhoods, near our homes. This level of frequency from 5g has not been properly tested and has the potential to cause untold harm to our residents! Neighborhoods across the world are starting to wake up to this danger and pushing back against the rollout of this technology. Please keep Newport residents safe and at least put a moratorium on this rollout until we have more data and testing for this technology. We know that radiation and cell towers have been proven to cause cancer, why would we put these new ones in our neighborhoods? Thank you! Nikki Leeper Sent from my iPhone Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5a Additional Materials Received AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) October 22, 2020, Planning Commission Item 5 Appeal These comments on a Newport Beach Planning Commission agenda item are submitted by: Jim Mosher ( jimmosher@yahoo.com ), 2210 Private Road, Newport Beach 92660 (949-548-6229). Item No. 5. AT&T SMALL CELL SLC4653 APPEAL (PA2019-115) - north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 900 feet northwest of El Paseo Drive This is the second of two appeals on the present Planning Commission agenda regarding the approval of Coastal Development Permits for “small cell” telecom installations, the other being Item 4. As with Item 4, it seems important to note that “small cell” installations are not small and visually unobtrusive. As proposed, they involve placing an 8-foot tall structure on top a City streetlight. And as with Item 4, this application has been before the Zoning Administrator twice. The first time for a Minor Use Permit, with denial by the City of any need for a CDP, and the second time for the CDP. Unlike Item 4, as alluded to on handwritten page 8 of the staff report, when the present matter was first before the Zoning Administrator as Item 4 on April 16, 2020, now-Chair Weigand attempted to call the approval up for review, but the call was rejected for being filed one day too late. This suggests reasonable minds can differ as to which of several possible locations to select. It also suggests the Planning Commissioners may have continuing questions about the City’s plans for deployment of cell antennas, some of which I tried to list in the email reproduced on handwritten page 35, specifically: Is the Master License Agreement really part of a master plan? If so, what is the plan? Does the MLA somehow override the code and mean streetlights are to be approved even when higher priority non-residential sites might be used instead? How are other carriers to be accommodated? Why is present and future collocation not part of the discussion? What happens when, as has been hinted at, 5G requires even denser networks? The second of those seems particularly relevant here, for as mentioned on handwritten page 9, when another carrier, T-Mobile, had a similar wish to improve capacity on Bayside Drive, they came to the Zoning Administrator with a proposal, and were approved as Item 5 on October 25, 2018, for a stealth facility on the roof of the Bahia Corinthian Yacht Club building at 1601 Bayside Drive. Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5b Additional Materials Received AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) October 22, 2020, PC agenda Item 5 appeal statement - Jim Mosher Page 2 of 3 Staff believes the site has not yet been constructed for “technical reasons,” but the true reasons why carriers exercise or fail to exercise approved permits are often unknown, and whatever T- Mobile’s reasons, it is difficult to see why AT&T could not pursue such a much higher priority stealth option. Unlike with Item 4 on the present agenda, there is not an absence of alternatives to City streetlights. Of those to City streetlights, I suspect Chair Weigand’s April call for review was intended to elicit a more thoughtful comparison of the relative merits of the proposed location and Alternative Site No. 4 (handwritten page 13) where the coastal bluff is already degraded with solar panels. Staff and the Zoning Administrator have rejected that alternative, feeling it is more visually impactful than the proposed site. But this is purely subjective decision, and the public has a right to have such subjective decisions made, not by staff members, but by their fellow citizens on the Planning Commission. Hence, the primary motivation for this appeal. Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5b Additional Materials Received AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) October 22, 2020, PC agenda Item 5 appeal statement - Jim Mosher Page 3 of 3 Finally, as pointed out in my email on handwritten page 35, if the Planning Commission accepts staff’s arguments with respect to Item 4 on the present agenda that NBMC Subsection 21.49.040.B.6 does not prohibit the "conversion" into cell sites of any existing vertical structures between the first public road and the sea, then one could also consider the conversion of a private light standard in the Bayside Marina parking lot at 1353 Bayside Drive. Although in the viewshed from the first public road to the bay, with the screening by the trees, a location in this lot might be noticed by fewer people than an installation on a streetlight, seen by all, in the Bayside Drive right-of-way. Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5b Additional Materials Received AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) From:Stemler, Robert To:Planning Commissioners Subject:10-22-20 Planning Commission Agenda Item #5 AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 (PA2019-115) Appeal Date:Thursday, October 22, 2020 1:03:08 PM [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commissioners, I am writing in support of the appeal of the Zoning Administrator’s August 27, 2020 decision to approve a Coastal Development Permit.   I am writing on behalf of Marguerite Stemler, the property owner at 1409 Dolphin Terrace, Corona del Mar, California.    Mrs. Stemler strongly objects to the proposed installation of the wireless facility in its proposed location directly in front of Mrs. Stemler’s property.    In addition to representing Mrs. Stemler’s interest, I am a 30 year plus resident of the City of Newport Beach.  As noted below, we objected to the installation of the wireless facility in its proposed location on essentially two grounds.   First, we do not believe Alternative Site #4 was properly considered as a viable site since AT&T, or its contractor, incorrectly concluded that the pedestrian access stair was an impediment to the installation.   Second, we objected to the installation at the proposed location on aesthetic grounds. We also note that other parties have raised procedural objections to the installation which were denied.  As set forth in our objection, Alternative Site #4 at City Streetlight No. SLC4655 is not only viable, but it is a preferred location from an aesthetic point of view.   Zoning Administrator Murillo and staff correctly concluded at the hearing that the pedestrian access stair is an illegal encroachment in the right of way.  Given this illegal encroachment, the existence of the stairway should not be a basis for disregarding Alternative Site #4 as the preferred location for the installation.   Although it was acknowledged at the hearing that the stairway should be removed by the homeowner (which is not difficult removal given the nature of the stair installation – see Photo #4 below), no reconsideration of Alternative Site #4 was ordered.   We ask that this decision be reviewed and respectfully request that Alternative Site #4 be ordered to be reconsidered without consideration of the pedestrian access stair.  During the initial hearing, Zoning Administrator Murillo clarified that he only had discretion to address the aesthetics of the proposed installation sites.  Alternative Site #4 at City Streetlight No. SLC4655 sits in front of a solar panel superstructure (See Photo #4 below).   In contrast, the proposed location locates the facility in front of a beautifully landscaped hillside which has been enjoyed by numerous citizens and visitors to Newport Beach over the years.   Further, the proposed location would block views from the landscaped paths and seating areas on the hill which do not exist (and cannot exist) on  the hillside at Alternative Site #4 which is almost entirely covered by the solar panel superstructure. As noted by Zoning Administrator Murillo at the initial hearing, the landscaped hillside is more Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5c Additional Materials Received After Deadline AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) aesthetically pleasing than the solar superstructure located on the hill at Alternative Site #4.  As we noted, locating the wireless facility in front of the solar panel superstructure is consistent with the aesthetics that the superstructure’s homeowner has chosen for this location, technology over beauty.   Yet, Zoning Administrator Murillo determined that locating the installation at Alternative Site #4 would be more intrusive since Bayside Drive curves out at that location.   We respectfully disagree with this conclusion.  As the following pictures demonstrate (See Photos #1, #2 and #3 below), the light pole at Alternative Site #4 does not protrude more than the proposed location and, in fact, may protrude less.   For these reasons, we ask that this decision be reviewed and respectfully request that Alternative Site #4 be ordered to be considered as the preferred location for the cell .     Photo #1 - Proposed Location of Installation   Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5c Additional Materials Received After Deadline AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115)       Photo #2 - Alternative Site #4       Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5c Additional Materials Received After Deadline AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115)       Photo #3 – Alternative Site #4       Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5c Additional Materials Received After Deadline AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115)     Photo #4 – Alternative Site #4       Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5c Additional Materials Received After Deadline AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115)       Based on pure aesthetics, we believe that of the sites considered for the proposed installation, Alternative Site #4 is clearly a preferred alternative over the proposed location.   For the reasons set forth above, we request that the appeal be granted and that the proposed installation be located Alternative Site #4 or some alternative site.  Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5c Additional Materials Received After Deadline AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115)   Best regards,   Robert J. Stemler     ........................................................................................................................... Robert J. Stemler Keesal, Young & Logan 400 Oceangate, Long Beach, CA 90802 562.436.2000 (office) | 562.436.7416 (fax) robert.stemler@kyl.com | www.kyl.com KYL has offices in Los Angeles/Long Beach, San Francisco, Seattle, Anchorage and Hong Kong. This e-mail contains information that may beconfidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive messages for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose this message, or any information contained herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Nothing in this message should be interpreted as a digital or electronic signature that can be used to authenticate a contract or legal document. Unauthorized use of this information in any manner is prohibited.         Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5c Additional Materials Received After Deadline AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal Public right-of-way on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 900 feet northwest of El Paseo Drive Planning Commission Public Hearing October 22, 2020 Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Community Development Department -Planning Division Project Background and Appeal •City’s review limited by federal law •Aesthetics •Land use •Environmental impacts •February 12, 2019, CC authorized MLA with New Cingular Wireless, LLC for use of City-owned streetlights •April 16, 2020, ZA approves Resolution No. ZA2020- 031 •Call for review attempted by the PC after appeal period expired and UP2019-034 became effective. 2 of 17 Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Community Development Department -Planning Division •Later determined CDP required •On August 27, 2020, the ZA conducted a public hearing and approved CD2020-118 •On September 9, 2020, Mr. Mosher filed appeal citing inadequate consideration of alternative locations and collocation 3 of 17 Project Background and Appeal Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Community Development Department -Planning Division 4 SLC4653 Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) •Remove SLC4653 •Replace in same location •Install support equipment •Same luminaire height (light source) •Height increase from 21’-1” to 27’-5” •Antennas enclosed in shroud •Equipment below grade and inside pole Community Development Department -Planning Division Request 5 of 17 Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Community Development Department -Planning Division Design 6 of 17 6’-4” height increase Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Community Development Department -Planning Division Rendering EXISTING 7 of 17 PROPOSED Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Community Development Department -Planning Division Coverage EXISTING 8 of 17 PROPOSED Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Community Development Department -Planning Division Alternative Sites SLC4653 Alt. #1 Alt. #2 Alt. #3 Alt. #4 9 of 17 Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Community Development Department -Planning Division Alternative Site No 1 SLC4651 10 of 17 Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Community Development Department -Planning Division Alternative Site No 2 SLC4652 11 of 17 Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Community Development Department -Planning Division Alternative Site No 3 SLC4654 12 of 17 Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Community Development Department -Planning Division Alternative Site No 4 SLC4655 13 of 17 Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Community Development Department -Planning Division Traveling northbound on Bayside Drive 14 of 17 Alt. #3 Alt. #4 Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Consistent with LCP City-owned streetlight replacement Not impeding access Not impacting public view Not within sensitive area Consistent with ZC and GP MUP obtained Visual compatibility Blends with streetscape Large parkway area Complies with NBMC 21.49 standards <35 feet tall Concealed within pole and underground Alternative sites considered Community Development Department -Planning Division Findings 15 of 17 Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) •Conduct de novo public hearing •Find project exempt from CEQA •Adopt the Resolution to uphold ZA’s decision and approve the CDP •Correction to draft resolution Community Development Department -Planning Division Recommendation 16 of 17 Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Contact Questions? Joselyn Perez 949-644-3312 jperez@newportbeachca.gov www.newportbeachca.gov Community Development Department -Planning Division Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5d Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) © 2020 AT&T Intellectual Property. AT&T, Globe logo, and DIRECTV are registered trademarks and service marks of AT&T Intellectual Property and/or AT&T affiliated companies. All other marks are the property of their respective owners AT&T and Small Cells Newport Beach –Planning Commission, October 22, 2020 Judy Woolen / AT&T External Affairs Cory Autrey / Wireless Policy Group (AT&T Consultant) Franklin Orozco / Ericsson (AT&T Consultant) Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Applicant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Newport Beach –AT&T Permitting 2 •Initial Submittal June 2019 •Deemed Complete early 2020 •ZA Hearing MUP April/ May 2020 (no appeal) •ZA Hearing CDP August 27 (appealed) AT&T Proprietary (Restricted) Only for use by authorized individuals or any above -designated team(s) within the AT&T companies and not for general distribution Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Applicant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) This photo depicts an example of what a small cell could look like. Actual size, shape and dimensions may vary by location. What is a Small Cell? 3 Small Cell Radio Fiber Small Cell Antenna A New Network Architecture is Needed Small cells are flexible, targeted network solutions that cover a radius up to 250 –1,000 feet and can be readily deployed to specific locations, including: •Where customers are prone to experience connectivity issues •Heavily populated areas that need more network density •Areas that can’t effectively be served by a traditional macro cell Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Applicant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Small cells help to bring the network “closer” to its users to deliver increased data density, faster connectivity speeds and an overall better wireless experience. 4 AT&T and Small Cells / Month XX, 2020 / © 2020 AT&T Intellectual Property -AT&T Proprietary (Internal Use Only) Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Applicant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) AT&T and Public Rights-of-Way (PROW) 5 •California Public Utilities Code Sections 7901 and 7901.1 •Statewide Franchise to place poles and install equipment in the PROW. •Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 •Access to PROW on a competitively neutral and non -discriminatory basis. •FCC 2018 Wireless Infrastructure Order (Small Cell Order) •Contemplates use of structures in the PROW suitable to place small cells. AT&T Proprietary (Restricted) Only for use by authorized individuals or any above -designated team(s) within the AT&T companies and not for general distribution Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Applicant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Applicant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) © 2018 AT&T Intellectual Property. AT&T, Globe logo, and DIRECTV are registered trademarks and service marks of AT&T Intellectual Property and/or AT&T affiliated companies. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. AT&T Small Cell Site ID: CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_038 Alternative Sites Analysis City streetlight No. SLC4653 located on the north side of Bayside Drive, approximately 900 feet northwest of El Paseo Drive, Newport Beach. Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Applicant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) LTE 1900_Coverage without Small cell © 2016 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. AT&T Proprietary (Internal Use Only) Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies except under written agreement. Macro site Proposed small cell Nodes Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Applicant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) LTE 1900_Coverage with Small cell © 2016 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. AT&T Proprietary (Internal Use Only) Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies except under written agreement. Macro site Proposed small cell Nodes Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Applicant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) 10 Map of Small Cell Node CRAN_RLOS_HBNPB_038 and Alternative Sites On this aerial map, AT&T’s proposed Small Cell Node HBNPB_038 is designated by a red marker and the alternative sites are identified by yellow markers. Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Applicant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) 11 •Steep hillside, narrow space •Requires grading and 8-foot expansion of retaining walls •Major grading & more intrusive built Alternative Site #2 City streetlight No. SLC4652 northside of Bay Drive, 720’ northwest of El Paseo Drive. Alternative Site #1 City streetlight No. SLC4651 northside of Bay Drive, 498’ northwest of El Paseo Drive. •Steep hillside, narrow space •Requires grading and 8-foot expansion of retaining walls. •Major grading & more intrusive built Proposed Node City streetlight No. SLC4653 northside of Bay Drive, 900’ north of El Paseo Drive. •Design meets city code •Landscape buffer •Available utilities •Visually lest intrusive Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Applicant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) 12 •Steep hillside, narrow space •Conflict with existing trees Alternative Site #4 City streetlight No. SLC4655 northside of Bay Drive, 1300’ northwest of El Paseo Drive. Alternative Site #3 City streetlight No. SLC4654 northside of Bay Drive, 1100’ northwest of El Paseo Drive. •Steep hillside, narrow space •Requires grading and 8-foot expansion of retaining walls. •Major grading & more intrusive built •Conflicts with substructure drain •Disruption of existing access stairs •Visually intrusive Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Applicant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5f Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Appellant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5f Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Appellant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5f Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Appellant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5f Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Appellant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5f Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Appellant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5f Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Appellant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5f Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Appellant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115) Planning Commission - October 22, 2020 Item No. 5f Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Appellant AT&T Small Cell SLC4653 Appeal (PA2019-115)