Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20191114_ZA_MinutesMINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE NEWPORT BEACH ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 11/14/2019 Page 6 of 7 The Zoning Administrator opened the public hearing. Seeing that no one from the public wished to comment, the public hearing was closed. Action: Approved ITEM NO. 10 Van Mechelen Residential Demolition Coastal Development Permit No. CD2019-050 (PA2019-213) Site Location: 719 West Balboa Boulevard, Units 1, 2, 3 and 4 Council District 1 Liane Schuller, Planning Consultant, provided a brief project description stating that this is an R-1 zoned property, not located on the waterfront, currently developed with an existing non-conforming fourplex. The applicant is requesting approval to demolish the existing structure; no new construction is yet proposed. A coastal development permit is required for demolition because the structure contains more than two units on a site located within the coastal zone. The demolition activities will occur within the project site and conditions of approval are included in the draft resolution to ensure that materials and equipment are contained onsite and do not impact public rights-of-way. The Zoning Administrator opened the public hearing. Seeing that no one from the public wished to comment, the public hearing was closed. The Zoning Administrator requested additional language be added to Condition of Approval No. 14, requiring that erosion control measures be implemented and maintained until such time as a new development project is approved with its own erosion and water quality control measures. Action: Approved ITEM NO. 11 317 Coronado Residential Demolition Coastal Development Permit No. CD2019-051 (PA2019-218) Site Location: 317 Coronado Street, Units A, B and C Council District 1 Liane Schuller, Planning Consultant, provided a brief project description stating that this is an R-1 zoned property, not located on the waterfront, currently developed with an existing non-conforming triplex. The applicant is requesting approval to demolish the existing structure; no new construction is proposed as of yet. A coastal development permit is required for demolition because the structure contains more than two units on a site located within the coastal zone. The demolition activities will occur within the project site and conditions of approval are included in the draft resolution to ensure that materials and equipment are contained onsite. The Zoning Administrator opened the public hearing. Applicant Jami Deusterman of Sepulveda Builders, on behalf of the property owner, stated that she had reviewed the draft resolution and agrees with all of the required conditions. Seeing that no one else wished to comment, the public hearing was closed. The Zoning Administrator requested additional language be added to Condition of Approval No. 14, requiring that erosion control measures be implemented and maintained until such time as a new development project is approved with its own erosion and water quality control measures. Action: Approved ITEM NO. 12 315 East Bay Avenue Residential Demolition Coastal Development Permit No. CD2019-052 (PA2019-219) Site Location: 315 East Bay Avenue, Units A, B, C and D Council District 1 Liane Schuller, Planning Consultant, provided a brief project description stating that the site is an R-2 zoned property, not located on the waterfront, currently developed with an existing non-conforming fourplex. The applicant is requesting approval to demolish the existing structure. At this time, no plans have been MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE NEWPORT BEACH ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 11/14/2019 Page 7 of 7 submitted for the redevelopment of the property. A coastal development permit is required for the demolition because the structure contains more than two units on a site located within the coastal zone. The Zoning Administrator opened the public hearing. Applicant Jami Deusterman of Sepulveda Builders, on behalf of the property owner, stated that she had reviewed the draft resolution and agrees with all of the required conditions. Bill Dildeen spoke stating that, based on a survey of his property some years ago, it appears that property lines were not accurately located for some properties. He worries that the project site may have the same problem, which should be addressed when redevelopment plans are submitted. Mr. Mosher questioned whether the two underlying lots were of a size that would allow more than a single residence on each. It was clarified by the Zoning Administrator that any new development proposal would be reviewed for compliance with all applicable development standards. The Zoning Administrator closed the public hearing. The Zoning Administrator requested additional language be added to Condition of Approval No. 14, requiring that erosion control measures be implemented and maintained until such time as a new development project is approved with its own erosion and water quality control measures. Action: Approved V. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS None. VI. ADJOURNMENT The hearing was adjourned at 4:23 p.m. The agenda for the Zoning Administrator Hearing was posted on November 7, 2019, at 2:45 p.m. on the digital display board located inside the vestibule of the Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center Drive and on the City’s website on November 7, 2019, at 11:00 a.m. James Campbell Zoning Administrator