HomeMy WebLinkAboutMASTER PLAN AMENDMENT # 25 COUNCILMEN CITY OF N9EWPORT BEACH MINUTES
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
O 'o Place: Council Chambers
2 oo m�yo 0 13 Time: 7:30 P. M.
ROLL CALL s�v o Date: June 8, 1970 INDEX
Present x x x x x x x Roll Call.
The reading of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
Motion x May 25, 1970 was waived, and said Minutes were
approved as written and ordered filed.
,
HEARINGS:
1. Mayor Hirth opened the continued public hearings in Promon-
connection with Master Plan Amendments No. 25 and tory
the proposed closing up, vacation and abandonment of Bay
a portion of Bayside Drive (Promontory Bay). Master
Plan Amendment No. 25 proposed to amend the
Master Street and Highway Plan by realigning Bayside
Drive between East Coast Highway and Jamboree I
Road (Marine Avenue), and to close a section of
existing Bayside Drive westerly of Jamboree Road
(Marine Avenue). The public hearing in connection
with the proposed Bayside Drive vac a fi on was
held in,�accordance with Resolution No. 7163, being a
resolution of the City Council of the City of Newport
Beach declaring its intention to order the closing up,
vacation and abandonment of a portion of a certain
street known as Bayside Drive.
j y
The following items were also considered in con-
junction with the above public hearings:
(a) Tentative Map for Tract 3867 (Promontory Bay),
a subdivision of 24. 0± acres into 62 residential
lots and Lot A reserved for waterway purposes,
Lot B reserved for planted area, Lot C reserved I
for common waterway access area, Lot D I
reserved for parking and Marina facilities, Lot E 4
reserved for park site and Lot 63 reserved for
commercial site.
(b) Application for Use Permit 1466 requesting per-
mission to develop residential area of single
family dwelling units and supporting recreational
facilities to include a yacht basin and marina
(Promontory Bay).
City Attorney Tully Seymour presented a report on
the basis of severance damages to Balboa Yacht
Basin property.
,
Volume-24 - Page 122
I
t
i
,
i
Ii
I
i
COUNCILMEN CITY OF NEWPOIRT BEACH MINUTES
ROLL CALL ' �' ` June 8, 1970 INDEX
David Kaylor, representing The Irvine Company,
requested deletion of Planning Commission condition
No. 5, which condition provided for a service road
:in accordance with Section 19. 20. 050 of the Municipal
Code.
Planning Director Larry Wilson reported on revenues
and cost estimates on various types of development
on said property.
Harry E. Westover, representing the Balboa Yacht
Basin, spoke regarding possible future severance
damages.
Allen Beek requested that provision be made for a
bicycle trail on Bayside Drive.
Dee Cook opposed curb cuts which would allow backing
up onto streets.
Motion x The hearing was closed.
Ayes xxxxx _
Motion x The following resolutions were adopted after the
Ayes x x x x x reading of the resolutions was waived by unanimous
Noes x consent of the Council:
Abstain x
Resolution No. 7187 adopting Amendment No. 25 R,7187
to the Master Street and Highway Plan;
Resolution No. 7188 ordering the vacation, R-7188
closing up and abandonment of a portion of a
certain street known as Bayside Drive;
and the execution of an Indemnity Agreement was
authorized between the City of Newport Beach and The
Irvine Company whereby The Irvine Company agrees
to indemnify and save harmless the City from any
liability or damages arising out of the abandonment
and relocation of Bayside Drive, with a maximum
limitation of $50, 000 plus reimbursement to the City
for any attorney's fees and court costs up to a
maximum amount of $5, 000.
Motion x The Tentative Map for Tract 3867 was adopted, Tr 3867
Ayes xxxxxxx subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning
Commission except Condition 5, which provided for a
service road, was deleted, and -subject to the'
conditions that the Planning Department and Irvine
Company work out details for a bicycle trail along
Volume 24 - Page 123
COUNCILMEN CI?Y OF NEWPORT BETCH MINUTES
S�?0 ti nP 00 9
A PN
ROLL CALL June 8, 1970 INDEX
Bayside Drive and that provision be made for adequate
off-site signing for the Balboa Yacht Basin, and Use UP 1466
Permit No. 1466 was approved, subject to the con-
ditions recommended by the Planning Commission.
Motion x It was directed that the waterways be dedicated to Waterways
Ayes xxxxxxx the City of Newport Beach with the stipulation that Dedication
the bulkheads be behind the bulkhead lines.
Z. Mayor Hirth opened the public hearing, pursuant to Le Salon
Municipal Code Section 5. 40, in connection with De Trait-
proposed revocation of business license No. 6395 ments
issrj d to J. J. Van Oberermeer, doing business as
Le i alon De Traitments, located at 2930 West Coast
Hig�way.
i
Detective John Simons of the Newport Beach Police
Department testified concerning certain allegations
regarding criminal offenses involving prostitution
activities at the subject premises.
No one else desired to be heard.
Business License No. 6395 issued to J. J. Van
Motion Oberermeer, dba Le Salon De Traitments, located
Ayes xxxxxxx at 2930 West 'Coast Highway, was revoked.
ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION:
1. Ordinance No. 1338, being, Parkway
Trees
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT
BEACH ADDING CHAPTER 13. 09 ENTITLED
"PARKWAY TREES" TO TITLE 13 OF THE
NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE,
requiring trees to be planted in abutting parkways
where new commercial or residential buildings are
fconstructed or where commercial or residential
r buildings are increased in size by 50% or more, was
presented for second reading.
Motion x Ordinance No. 1338 was adopted after the reading of
Ayes x x x x x x x the ordinance was waived by unanimous consent of
the Council.
Volume 24 - Page 124,
I
• +lM+.y74��7a'�1 �lrr�rw'iw'
WWAMS the kl+awtivg comiss on and the City GQUAOIX
have hsrrscatars artaptsd a m4stsr P10A *hick Includox .as A unit
thaveof ,a Nester «s°zVotat *ud Uighwwey k ltn# with revisions; and
WXUAMO Utudica UY refs iisxrr.+i4 commission rraysal
thKt 0LOCs the A&PtiOu 01 SAW Nester Strew~, &Ad 1" *y flan
tbemk have boon ahw4ea in Conditions vw>ah UW100a that "Id
rum shcould be Mundad to show now Olig"Onts, adaitio'now street
now aorreativas utr+:t cussifl' Lion *hongaa; And ,
a"f the 44MAIng r:Owisrtiatx of tilts City of pswpart
bsaab; after noti+t~+wa as uquUmd. by laiwt has. bail • public h"ting
on the proposed Aftudroont and #tax rscarrsMAIded tit aAdoPtiOn CA:
the SMA4esrus. ac> UW i*Astar 4"teu 444 HAY PLWi and
1 WAUS 1, tha CiV Couao,i i, ref Mr A0t1QW'As rrequlx*d by
J.WS hu hold 4t putrl.aa bajkxJr4 att 04if� pCOpOM*(k s"n4"At t ald
M* the C ,ty Oatatsii has 40-Urrrr3MkI thUt it 0
desitsble to soond said baiwtav $tract and XISh"y 21" *0
rsacommanded;
II 0tl O Tmusu"t g)z IT asiv 1Vgo tttart,c the WXY "uai;Ll
of the city of sewipo;cz Uw:s[cSt dces haraby �Ittcrpt A»tXdolrrrt go, 25
to the Nestor f►trsst 444 w4hw*y play ss Shove all a UOP uAtitiad
Mkibit "A * *tta*had harcto aAd mdo a part has vOL& "S�&"tlua
tlMrrearn tb&t X4yolde imiva barLwea u"g Qi sk". kX3ghfty" Au,4 JsTd2roroo
; . . Wad (*AA" As++r AUO) shOuLd bg rr+ 414uec; Wr4wrlY 09 ""song
MWSUW Driver, 404 said armaustment #fie 'Atw4d to tug Qlq of
Nswporct leach ,!fester.• # tarf..'et aucj Uj4k4dlty t'IAU*
AWMI>s this of ���Q•
ATl`JeAYI'i
r+r fr���.O�TK+�.�«� yGX`
rwwr�w.r�.rr.�w+ .
{i'RSs
J^2L-70
V
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH ORDERING THE VACATION, CLOSING
UP AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF A CERTAIN
STREET KNOWN AS BAYSIDE DRIVE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach
did, on the 23rd day of March, 1970, pass its certain Resolution
of Intention No. 7163, declaring its intention to order the
vacation, closing up and abandonment of a portion of a certain
street known as Bayside Drive, in the City of Newport Beach,
hereinafter more particularly described, pursuant to and in
accordance with the "Street Vacation Act of 1941, " and all
amendments thereto, being Sections 8300 to 8331, inclusive of
the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the Street Superintendent of the City of
Newport Beach has caused to be posted conspicuously along the
line of the portion of said street proposed to be vacated, not
more than 300 feet apart, and not less than three in all, notices
of the vacation of said portion of said street, all of which
will more fully appear from the affidavit of Joseph T. Devlin,
Street Superintendent of the City of Newport Beach, on file in
these proceedings; and
WHEREAS, said notices so posted by the Street Superin-
tendent of the City of Newport Beach stated the passage of said
Resolution of Intention No, 7163 aforesaid, and the time and
place of the hearing of all persons interested in or objecting to
the proposed vacation of said portion of said street; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach
did set Monday, May 25, 1970, at 7:30 p.m. of said day as the
-1-
5/20/70
time, and the Council Chamber of the City Council of the City
olf Newport Beach, as the place for the hearing of all persons
interested in or objecting to the proposed vacation of said
portion of said street; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution of Intention No. 7163
aforesaid has been published at least once in the Newport
Harbor Ensign, the official newspaper of the City, and said
publication was made more than 15 days prior to the date set
for the hearing of all persons interested in or objecting to
the proposed vacation, all of which will more fully appear by
the affidavit of Arvo E. Haapa, Printer and Publisher of the
Newport Harbor Ensign, on file in these proceedings; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Newport
Beach has heard the evidence, both written and verbal, of all
persons interested in the vacation of said portion of said
street in this resolution more particularly hereinafter des-
cribed, and finds from all the evidence submitted that said
portion of said street described in said Resolution of
Intention, and hereinafter described, is unnecessary for
present or prospective public street purposes;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of
Newport Beach finds and determines and hereby orders that
the following described portion of that certain street known
as Bayside Drive in the City of Newport Beach, to wit:
Those portions of Block 94 of Irvine 's Subdivision
as shown on a map thereof, recorded in Book 1, page 88
of Miscellaneous Record Maps, records of Orange County,
California, described as follows :
Parcel 1
BEGINNING at an angle point in the Southerly right-
of-way line of Bayside Drive as conveyed to the County
of Orange by deed recorded in .Book 830, page 217 of
Official Records, records of said Orange County, Calif-
ornia, said point being a 1 1/2" iron pipe and nail as
-2-
shown on a map of Tract No. 4003, recorded in Book 188,
pages 13 through 19, inclusive, of Miscellaneous Maps,
records of said Orange County, California; thence along
said Southerly right-of-way line of Bayside Drive,
South 84' 46 ' 33" East, 1242 .50 feet to the True Point
of Beginning of this description: thence continuing
South 84° 46 ' 33" East along said Southerly right-of-
way. line of Bayside Drive a distance of 716 .41 feet to
the beginning of a nontangent• curve, concave Northeaster-
ly, having a radius of 892 .00 feet, a radial line from
said beginning bears North 50 13' 2711 East; thence
Northwesterly along said curve, through a central angle
of 23° 58 ' 52" an arc distance of 373.35 feet to a point
in a line parallel with and 77 .00 feet Northerly of said
Southerly right-of-way line of Bayside Drive, a radial
line from said point bears North 290 12 ' 19" East; thence
North 840 46 ' 33" West along said parallel line a dis-
tance of 303.46 feet to the beginning of a nontangent
curve, concave Westerly, having a radius of 55.00 feet,
a radial line from said beginning bears South 710 36 '
48" West; thence Southerly and Westerly* along said curve,
through a central angle of 113' 34.'. 41 ' an arc distance of
109.03 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this descrip-
tion.
Parcel 2
BEGINNING at an angle point in the Southerly right-
of-way line of Bayside Drive "as conveyed to the County of
Orange by deed recorded in Book 830, page 217 of Official
Records, records of said Orange County, California, said
point being a 1 1/211 iron pipe and nail as shown on a map
of Tract No. 4003, recorded in Book 188, pages 13 through,
19, inclusive, of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said
Orange County, California; thence along said Southerly
right-of-way line of Bayside Drive, South 84° 46 ' 33" East,
1170.60 feet- thence leaving said Southerly right-of-way
line North 53 13 ' 27" East, 69 .30 feet to the True Point
of Beginning of this description, said point being in a
nontangent curve, concave Northwesterly, having a radius
of 100.00 feet, a radial line at said point bears North
190 41' 1011 West, thence Northeasterly along said curve,
through a central angle of 8° 59 ' 28", an arc distance of
15.69 feet; thence nontangent to said curve North 84 46
3311 West, 13.66 feet; thence South 50 13 ' 27" West, 7 .70
feet to the True Point of Beginning.
is.unmecessary for present or prospective public street purposes,
and that it be vacated, closed up and abandoned.
The City Council further finds and determines, and it is
1m reby ordered, that the public easement in the portion of said
street as heretofore described has, upon the passage of this
resolution, ceased except that the City reserves and excepts
from said vacation the permanent easement and right, at any
time, or from time to time, to construct, maintain, operate,
-3-
w
replace, remove and renew sanitary sewers and storm drains and
appurtenant structures in, upon, over and across said portion
of said street so vacated and pursuant to any existing
franchises or renewals thereof, or otherwise, to construct,
maintain, operate, replace, remove, renew and enlarge lines
of pipe, conduits, cables, wires, poles, and other convenient
structures, equipment and fixtures for the operation of gas
pipe lines, cable television, telegraph and telephone lines
and the distribution of electric energy, water, and incidental
purposes .
The City Council FURTHER ORDERS that the City Clerk
of the City of Newport Beach shall cause a certified copy of
this Order, duly attested by her as the City Clerk, under the
seal of the City, to be recorded in the Office of the County
Recorder of the County of Orange, State of California, imme-
diately following the passage of this resolution.
"
ADOPTED this '2� 5'th day of May, 1970.
Mayor
ATTESTS
City Clerk
THSomh
5/26/70
-4-
City Council Meeting May 25 , 1970
Council Agenda, Numbers B-3 , B-49 F-30 F-4
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
May, 22 , 1970
TO : City Council
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT : Promontory Bay Project
Because of time intervals which have passed between meetings of the •.
City Council at which the Promontory Bay project has been discussed ,
this report is presented to summarize recommendations which
previously have been submitted. Detailed reports were forwarded by
letters dated March 18, 1970 and April 27 , 1970. Members of the
Council are requested to refer to these reports for additional
information , including Planning Commission minutes and staff reports .
The Irvine Company has concurred with most of the conditions of
approval recommended by the Planning Commission . The principal
remaining difference of opinion with these recommendations pertains
to Item 5 of the Planning Commission recommendations on Tentative
Map Number 3867 , that Section 19. 20. 050 of the Municipal Code not
be waived. This section requires , "When the front of any lots abuts
any major, primary or secondary street or highway , the subdivider
shall be required to dedicate and improve a service road to provide
ingress and egress to and from such lots ----- " The information
submitted to the City Council -by letter dated March 18 , 1:970 includes
a discussion of this subject.
All parties agree that a four-lane street will have adequate capacity
to handle anticipated traffic ; however, the Planning Commission and
Planning Department staff believe that the residential environment
would be impaired for those lots fronting directly on the realigned
Bayside .Drive.
Respec ully submitted,,/
LAU ENCE WILSON
Planning Director r
ATTACHMENTS :
List of Attachments
A. Report to City Council from Planning Department ,
April 23 , 1970
. B. Report to City Manager from Harbor and Tidelands Administrator,
April 27 , 1970
C. Letter from Cedric A. White , Jr. , M.A. I . ,
April 14, 1970
D. Excerpt from Planning Commission minutes containing recommenda-
tions on Master Plan Amendment Number 25 ,
February 19 , 1970
E. Excerpt from Planning Commission minutes containing recommenda-
tions on Use Permit Application Number 1466 ,
February 19 , 1970
F. Excerpt from Planning Commission minutes contaiping recommenda-
tions on Tentative Map of Tract Number 38679
March 5 , 1970
r.
1
City Council Meeting April 27 , . 1970
Council Agenda Number B-1
CITY OF NEWPORT- BEACH
April 23 , 1970
TO: City .Council
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: Promontory Bay Project
Summary
By letter dated March 18, 1970 a comprehensive re.♦grt was submitted'
to the City Council , containing recommendations of the Planning
Commission on the following three aspects of the Prgmontory- Bay pro-
ject as submitted by the Irvine Company:
1 . Master Plan Amendment No . 25
Proposal to amend Master Street,and Highway Plan by
realigning Bayside Drive between East Coast Highway
and Jamboree Road (Marine Avenue) and also to close
a section of existing Bayside Drive westerly , of
Jamboree Road (Marine Avenue ) .
2. Use Permit Application No . 1466
Request to permit development of a residential area
of single-family dwelling units , with supporting'
commercial and recreational facilit1es , -to include
a yacht basin and marina.
3 . Tentative Map Tract No . 3867
Request to permit subdivision of• 24. 0± acres into 62
single-family residential lots , and Lot "A"• reserved
for waterway purposes , Lot "B" reserved for planted
area , Lot "C"' reserved for common waterway access area ,
Lot "D" reserved for parking and marina facility , Lot
"E" reserved for park site and Lot 63 reserved for
commercial site.
Consideration of• thesesubj,ects was continued by the City Council
from• the meeting of March 23 , 1970 to the meeting of April 27 , 1970.
Members of the Council are requested to refer to information pre-
viously forwarded. In addition , the following supplementary actions
have taken place since preparation of the earlier report.
Action of Joint Harbor Committee and Harbor Commission
The Joint Harbor Committee has discussed the Promontory Bay project
r
TO: City Council - 2 . '
at several meetings , and on April 14, 1970 voted to approve the
Promontory Bay project in principle , subject to the following
conditions : ,
1 . The applicant must receive approval from the
Corps of Engineers .
2 . The applicant must receive approval from the City
of Newport Beach .
3 , The applicant must take precautions against
creating excess turbidity, as outlined in State
Resources letter of March 25 , 1970 .
Later that day at its regular meeting , the Harbor Commission
ratified the above. However, the Commissioners had some additional
thoughts which they wanted to convey to you . First, it was felt
that the ll± acres to be dredged should be dedicated to a public
agency.
Second , the Commissioners felt that if maintenance dredging of the
area is necessitated because of storm damage or siltin 'frdm the
adjacent, undeveloped uplands , that the cost- for such1 r. edging
should be the responsibility ,of the developer. This was a •aoncern
of the District staff in a memo 'to the Committee memb600 . '
The third concern was that , although engineers for the developer
,indicated that the project will have no erosion ei'fecGt On alboa
Island, some level of responsibility should be ._pl4ced on„1:4 devel-
oper in the event adverse conditions might prevail:. l
The City is awaiting correspondence from the U . '
prior to submitting the application for-'a Harbor Oermi ,•:to the Council
for its consideration .
Status of Waterways
The City Harbor and Tidelands Administrator; Public Wdr,ks Director
and Planning Director have investigated questions in .dlved in the
status of the- proposed waterway designated as Lot "C" on Tentative
Map of Tract No. 3867 and jointly recommend that fee ownership of
this waterway area be granted to the City of Newport Beach . This
might involve certain future obligations for maintenance , but would
clarify the responsibilities and powers of the City 4nd 'simplify
administration and performance of municipal servicesa
The Harbor and Tidelands Administrator is prepared to report furthdr
on this subject. .
Sewerage
The City Public Works Director, City Engineer and Planning Director
jointlyrecommend that new local sewer lines be desi ne so that:
g d a ,
TO: City. Council - 3 .
1 . All existing sewer users can be served by the
new lines .
2. The existing sanitation district trunk sewer can
be abandoned and a 'surcharge condition in the
sanitation district faci'litie's will not cause flood-
ing of any homes .
Respectfully submitted , -
.
Laurence Wilson
. Planning Director.
L'W: hh
i
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
o
April 27, 1970
TO: City Manager
FROM: Harbor & Tidelands Administrator
SUBJECT: OWNERSHIP OF PRIVATELY CREATED WATERWAYS
The proposed development of Promontory Bay again brings up
consideration as to whether privately created waterways should remain
in private ownership, be dedicated as public rights-of-way, or be
granted to the City. The City Engineer and the Harbor & Tidelands
Administrator visited Ventura to' obtain their opinions and also separately
discussed the situation with Huntington Beach. These two cities have
situations analogous to ours:.
In Ventura, a private developer created waterways- leading into
the public marina and further established single family, and multiple
family residences bordering the waterways. The residents were formed
into a community association. The waterways- were subsequently granted
in fee to the City with a perpetual easement to the residents for pier
purposes. The reasoning in requiring granting of fee ownership to' the
City was based on their experience in private streets and they felt that
the .association would, over a period of years, never give proper mainte-
nance to the channel-ways and that ultimately. the City would inherit them
when they were in poor condition and with high maintenance costs. The
City now performs maintenance in these waterways, but assesses the water-
front owners to cover the cost.
In Huntington Beach, privately created waterways were also
granted in fee, from bulkhead line to bulkhead line, with perpetual water
easements for pier purposes. Huntington Beach cited the same reasons as
Ventura as far as maintenance was concerned, but the City also felt .that
they were greatly simplifying police problems. They had had experience in
one small privately owned waterway where they were constantly responding
to requests of the residents to chase public boaters away. The City is
of the opinion that their harbor patrol has no right to enter the private
waterways for enforcement purposes unless invited by the owner. '
On April 14 , the Orange County Harbor Commissioners expressed
their opinion that the dredged area at Promontory Bay should be dedicated
to a public agency. The rationale for their opinion was not included in
the letter from the Harbor District to the City Manager, but the Harbor
District Operations Officer states that they were influenced by maintenance
and law enforcement considerations as outlined above.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the privately created waterways
in the proposed Promontory Bay development should be granted in fee to the
City for the following reasons:
a. Maintenance : There should be little initial maintenance cost.
However, The Irvine Company intends to sell the individual lots fronting
2 _
on the waterway so that there will be multiple ownership of the shoreline.
Future maintenance problems could then involve a number of shoreline
owners, plus a private owner of the waterway, plus the City and the Harbor.
District. Future maintenance problems could best be handled in a coordin-
ated approach by the City or Harbor District. In requiring granting of
fee ownership, it should be taken from bulkhead line to bulkhead line with
the bulkheads themselves being the responsibility of the abutting property
owners as is the case in the' rest of the City. If necessary, conditions
can be imposed upon The Irvine Company in- the harbor permit relative to
external factors that might affect the lagoon such as, for instance, excess
sedimentation from storm drains during upland development, or any possible
adverse affect creation of the lagoon might have on adjacent public areas.
b. Water Quality: it is possible that the lagoon could become
a catch basin for debris entering from the main harbor in which case the
City and the Harbor District could find themselves constantly harassed
by the waterfront owners who would claim, "The debris came from public
waters so you clean it out" . It would be better to have the responsibility
in the first place.
c. Law Enforcement: It is difficult for boaters, particularly ,
those who may visit the City from other areas, to determine who owns the
land .underlying the water. A rash of calls from residents at Promontory ,
Bay could occur when other boats cruise around the lagoon, which they
are sure to do. It would be better to have the waterways public in the
first place. Further, the Harbor District believes their enforcement
authority is questionable' in private waterways.
d. Proliferation of Ownership: There are four different types
of ownership of submerged lands in Newport Harbor. By requiring granting
of fee ownership, the City would be taking a step towards eliminating one
type of ownership.
e. Future Contingencies : It is difficult tor forecast contin-
gencies many years from now, therefore, the City would be retaining an
option for the future if it owns the waterways.
While granting of fee ownership is recommended, and present
harbor permit pblicies' adequately protect shoreline owners insofar as pier
rights are concerned, water easements for pier rights could also be reserved.
Should the Council agree- in this recommendation, I suggest we
draft a formal policy to this' effect for the Council P Manual.
f
r ,
G. M. DAWES
GMD/db
I
CEDRIC A. WHITE, JR., M.A.I.
' REAL ESTATE APPRAISER
E31 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD • ANAHEIM,CALIFORNIA 921505 . (714) 774.Ob10-
April 14f, 1970
Mr. James P. DeChaine I
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California
, i
! RE: Economic Impact of Proposed � 1
Promontory Point Development
Dear Mr. DeChaine :
In accordance with your letter dated March 2 , 1970, I have studied
the economic impact of the Irvine Company's Promontory Point deve-
lopment on the Beacon Bay and Balboa Yacht Basin owned by the City i
of Newport Beach. My study is concerned with the effect on market '
value. in addition, you have requested my thinking as to the im-
pact on the lessees. II
The property was inspected in your company on January 16 , 1970. A
subsequent inspection occurred on April 6. As the result of these
inspections , and consideration of factors pertinent to value, I I
• have arrived at the following approximate conclusions :
1. The market value of the entire City-owned property
1. will not diminish, and probably will increase, by i
reason of the proposed Promontory Point development,
2. The retail operators within the Balboa Yacht Basin
! will not be benefitted by the development, and may
suffer a loss. These losses to the individual
operators should be limited and will be due to I
reduced drive-by trade. Furthermore, these. losses
will be nominal, when compared to the substantial II
benefits to the entire City-owned property ly
reason of improved privacy and residential desir-
ability. - I
The property which I have considered in this analysis consists of
the Balboa Yacht Basin W acres) and the •73 lots (one for recrea-
tional use) in the 11.6-acre Beacon Bay complex. These properties !
are further identified. on the County Assessor Maps 50-21 and 50-22,
These areas include fee-owned land comprising about half and tide-
land whi h comprises the•other half.
i
Mr. James P. DeChaine
April 14, 1970
Page 2
The highest and best use of the land is single-family residential
or two-unit residential. The Yacht Basin- portion could remain in
the present use, particularly considering that an exchange with the
State could convert all of the Yacht Basin into tidelands, releasing
all of the Beacon Bay lots to fee ownership.
II
In relation to the Promontory Point development, I have reviewed
Study B of Tentative Tract 3867 which is proposed by the Irvine
Company. While it will cul-de-sac Bayside Drive, it will improve
the residential desirability of this location.
If' there! are any additional questions , please don't 'hesitate to ask.
Very truly yours,
Cedric A. ' White, Jr. # M.A.I.
CAW:mt
II '!• ' ,.- r' , • ' • ' r�',l - it
'b .. - ,
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF .NEWPORT POACH ' '
February 19 ,' 1.970
Item 18
1ASTER PLA • Proposal to amend Master Street and Highway
hiENDMENT Plan by realigning Bayside Drive between
10. 25 East Coast Highway. and - Jamboree Road (Marine . ;
Avenue) . ;
PPROVED . -
Dave Kaylor, Irvine Company ; James Taylor,
Irvine Company ; and -Robert Bein , engineer ; -: •i•:.;'.
were present on this application . Due to -the ra.
lateness of the meeting (approximately 12 : 00
'midnight) , Chairman Jakosky asked the appl'i- i
cants ' feelings about holding the matter over
for two weeks . -Mr. Taylor ' felt very strongly .',:.:' ,,`'• . '
that the matter must be heard inasmuch as
it had been held over from the previous
meeting and two more weeks ' delay. would cause
undue expense and hardship. The meeting pro- •- , ';•,;; , "
ceeded with. Mr. Kaylor answering questions of
the Commission . Chairman Jakosky closed the
public hearing but as discussion by the Com-
mission became more involved , the hearing was
reopened by motion of Commissioner Glass ,, '
seconded by, Commissioner Dosh , approved unani -
mous I y
After further discussion and closing of the
public hearing, motion was made and passed
that Master Plan Amendment No . 25 be approved
subject to Staff recommendations :
T. -' That the Bayside Shopping Center parking
lot be • re,designed•; torthe satisfaction, •
of the Planning Director, and construct--
ed concurrently with construction- of
realigned Bayside Drive .
2. . That access 'requirements to the Sh'ark-" Motion' ; x
Island- Yacht Club and the adjacent 7: '. Second "• X '
-apartments.- be restored to the 'satis Aye ;:. :: "x x X ,xx ' '
'faction of .the Planning Director. . ` ;': '':,{ Nay"',*.;' _ ' •x
'CITY ,OF' NEWPORT 'I?il=/NCH COMMISSIONERS �
February 1.9 , 1970 ,..; ,.• ; .� ° �� u+
t e m 19
SE PERMIT '.' . Request to permit: development of a residential" ' ' '
0. 1466 area of single-family dwelling units , with
supporting• commercial . and 'recreational faci - '` ,
PPROVED . lities , to include a' yacht basin and marina: .
Location :- Portion of. Block 94 of Irvine' s ;
:Subdivision located between ,
Pacific Coast Highway and Bayside
, :Drive , west of Jamboree Road
..(proposed Promontory Bay)..`
: Zone:• Unclassified, C-N-H a'nd R-3
Applicant: The Irvine Company , Newport 'Beach
Owner: Same as applicant.
Planning Director Wilson read the application • '
and Commissioner Glass asked if the applicant ; ' : ;'; ',:. .•
"'.were agreeable to the condition's recommended
in the Staff report . Mr. Taylor stated that.- t `
they were not in •agreement with Condition: No. 5'`,;•'";;: . _
regarding the requirement of a separate use
permit for the proposed marine development ,...
of Parcel 2 . After discussion , the Chairman:;:
closed the public hearing and Commissioner.,.'
Adkinson made a motion for approval of Use
Permit 1466 with modified Staff recommenda- '•
tions as , followi
'1 That approval of Use Permit No. 1466
be subject to satisfactory demonstra-
tion of the engineering feasibility of_ ,:.,.
the proposed lagoon. design and issuance', :
of a harbor permit. (See report to
Joint Harbor Committee from City of
Newport Beach Harbor and Tidelands
Administrator attached. )
2. That an amendment to the Master Street':,' :" •
and Highway Plan is, approved.
3. That Parcel No. 3 and Parcel No. 4
be approved in principle only 'and- be
subject to a separate use permit for , ;• , '.`
each of the ,two parcels .
4. 'The• Irvine Company will undertake to
:rezone Parcel No. 9 to' single-family
residential and Pa.r,cel No . 1 , to
' include any designated channel cut , .
to an unclas*ified district .
6: Parcel No. -2 'subject to approval of.. Motion. , x
Planning Director; however, Planning • '.' ' Second x '
Commission does not waive any part o.f:• ' Abstain' x -
the parking requirements of. the .parcel .; ., Ayes;,"•, 4 . 1 x ' 'x x
IT.,O^•j rlSulrp i 5 r` t , n•'•�
' • r ' I T Itfl,llar'�r.liil111(Ili n,j ,•1 ,
•-'•ram .r 1 f ilr9,,,,�''1,11 1 t, � I',
r ; ,
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COMMISSIONERS }
Minutes of: Adjourned Meeting of Planning •Commissi•onw
Date : March 5 , 1970 N N v�
Time : 8:00 P. M. s P
Place : Council Chambers
Item 1 . --
TENTATIVE' Request to permit subdivision of 24. Ot acres, ::i:;.:' ••
MAP TRACT into 62 residential lots ; and Lot "All - reserved.-
NO. 3867 for waterway purposes , Lot "B" reserved for .
planted area , Lot "C" reserved for common 'water
APPROVED way access A.rea, Lot "D" , reserved ' for parking `
and marina facility , Lot "E" reserved for park; '
site and . Lot 63 reserved for commercial site': . : : "
Location : Portion of • Block 94 of Irvine ' s I
Subdivision located between Pacifi
'—Coast Highway and Bayside Drive ,,
west'. of Jamboree Road ( Promontory:: '
Bay)
Zone : 4 , Unclassified , C-N-H -and 'R-3
E,
Applicant : The Irvine Company ;- Newport Beach..
Owner : Same as applicant. ,
Planning Director Wilson presented the applica-
tion to the Commission , with Associate Planner ,'''.; r; i`: ;•'_,;
Nuzum pointing out the location of the various
items on the wall map. Mention was made of the ;
fact that" at the Planning Commission 'meeting of +:"';"
February 19 , •1970 ,• Master Plan Amendment 25 and , ' ;;;'.,=, '-I',, ,
Use Permit 1466 , both pertaini-ng to . this • same
location , were heard and approved by the Planr,
ning Commission .
Mr. Jack Raub and Mr. Bob Bein of Raub , Bein ,
Frost & Assoc. were present; also Mr. Dave Kayl r ?
and Mr. . Jim Taylor of the Irvine Company. Chaff .-.
man Jakosky expressed concern regarding the wi;d 1h.'":: ' ',,`_ '.'
of -the entrance channel into Promontory Bay, an
this was• discussed.' Also discussed were' the :''';-`.."`:.:`.'•
progress of other agencies involved (such as '
the Corps of ''Engineers •and Harbor Department) ,. "
the status of the frontage road , the matter of `:; :?.'• ' '
grading of the cliff and .the entrance roads 'to :;' , •
the mesa . The Irvine representatives expressed : •:' ,;., -. ••
disagreement with Con ditions '5 and 19• of •the '
Staff, report which were then reviewed .
Commissioner Watson moved that .Tentative Map Tr F.t• ','°; ;
No. 3867 be_:approved ,subject to .,Staff. condition
as follow: " . .
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COMMISSIONERS ;
O ? o N
March 5 , 1970
1 . That final 'approval be subject to the -
approval of Use Permit 1466 and the
conditions thereto ..
,
2 .. '" That final' approval of the subdivision ' •'
be subject ' to approval 'of an appropriate. ' :;i .f;...•
" revision to the Master PI-an of •Streets r
' -and Highways . . (Public hearings required )':.'• ,';:
3.` ' That final approval of 'the subdi'visi'on
be subject .to the abandonment of certain
existing public rights-of-way as contem-
plated and ,to satisfactory arrangements , ''. : `•;':;.
-being made for dedication and improvemen
of 'the new rights-of-way 'required. (Pub I ic, ,
hearing required. ) ;
4. That final approval of the subdivision b ,"..-,'' '
subject to` satisfactory arrangements • be-
ing made to relocate existing. facilities
of the .Orange' County Sanitation District
and of other affected utilities .
5 . That Section 19.20 . 050 of the Municipal
Code requiring a service road not be :
waived , and that the 'cross' section for
realigned Bayside Drive shall be in
ance with Alternate "C" of the attached
drawings . ' ' ."r'`'-
6. That access to Lots 27 through 34 , 42 '
through 44 (and unless a frontage road '„•;
is provided all parcels along realigne
Bayside Drive ) ,, be provided by means of
drives located on common lot -lines , each
drive serving two parcels ; and that ade-
quate turnaround' -areas be provided so
that vehicles need not back into the str et•;;?; it„-
Cross easements or non-barrier agreement ; -',;.,`; +
: satisfactory to the City Attorney shall e•
provided so as- to guarantee perpetuation
of the access, arrangement.
7. That 'unless a frontage road is provided , . '.
the right-of-way width of real.igned Bay-
side Drive be at least 86 ' and the curb-
, to-curb width Pbe at least 701 . This cro s "
section will provide for 4 travel lanes ,
.2 eight foot wide
. g w parkways , a 121wide ,
',
• .,. median left turning lane an•d an 8 wide • � •. •„ •
parking lane 'on the southerly side .. '
(Alternate '"B"� •oh,' the attached drawings .•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COMMISSIONERS
' p
March 5 , 1970
' .,8. That' the new cul -de-sac be located entir ly
on the developer' s 'land .
R., That the design of the new intersections
of• realigned Bayside Drive with existing
Bayside Drive be subject to review and ';s•'•..,'. :
approval by the City .
' 10. ' That all improvements be' constructed as
required by ordinance - and the Public
Works Department . , .
'; • 1l .' That the ' boundary of the final tract• may
be checked by the County Surveyor before
being submitted to the City, for approval
12 . . That all grading be in accordance with
grading plans and reports approved by th
Public Works Director and a 'qualified
Soils Engineer. Upon completion of the
grading , the Civil Engineer and the Soil
Engineer shall certify that the grading
has been completed in accordance with th
plans , the soils report and the grading
ordinance . Reproducible copies of the
plans on standard size sheets shall be
furnished to the Public Works Department
•13. That the connecting street southeasterly
of Lot "B" be' 52 ' in width between exter or'; ;•
curbs An order 'to provide for a 20 ' . ente
'ing roadway , an 8' median and a '24' exit .
ing roadway. '
14. That all driveways be a minimum of 20 ' i
length from the property line to ensu're •.
y'• no parking will b'e i'n the public right-o -way': ,
15:. The portion of Lot "E" not included• in t e
public right-of-way , resulting from the
closing of Bayside Drive ,• be dedicated t
the City , .'and the existing right-of-way
of Bayside Drive west of the proposed
waterway be. retained under public contro
1.6. ,..A length .of tangent be provided between he •
two reversing curves at the east en'd of he
development adjacent to the -existing ,
B,ay J.de:: , :
Shopping ' Cemter
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH..`,' COMMISSIONERS
March 5 , 1970
17:.•,` Parkway -trees be' installed on all public
I _ rights-of-way in accordance- with Parks ,
Beaches and Recreation Department .speci .f
cations .
-Appropriate 'landscaping be installed on , -: .,, ,, , -
i all s-lopes and vacant spaces resulting
.from this ' deve1•opment.
.•,;:;, 19:: A setback plan allowing for a variation
- of front and rear setback lines be submi -
ted to the Planning Director for approva
20. ' ' That there be no City financial obligati ns •.- "
connected with construction of ,realigned
Bay,side Drive .
` 21 . .• That realigned Bayside Drive be c'onstruc ed
! to its full width in 'connection with ' the
:-developmeryt.-of, Tract. 3867.. Motion x
Second,.:' x
'Aye '. x x x x x x
- Nay - -- - - x
r `
City Council Meeting April 27 , . 1970
Council Agenda Number B-1
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
April 23 , 1970
TO: City ,Council
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: Promontory Bay Project
Summary
By letter dated March 18, 1970 a comprehensive rep`grt was submitted
to the City Council , containing recommendations of i;he Planning
Commission on the following three aspects of the Prgmontory Bay pro-
ject as submitted by the Irvine Company:
1 . Master Plan Amendment No . 25
Proposal to amend Master Street and Highway Plan by
realigning Bayside Drive between East Coast Highway
and Jamboree Road (Marine Avenue ) and also to close
a section of existing Bayside Drive westerly of
Jamboree Road (Marine Avenue) .
2 . Use Permit Application No. 1466
Request to permit development of a residential area
of single-family dwelling units , with supporting
commercial and recreational facilities , to include
a yacht basin and marina.
3 . Tentative Map Tract No. 3867
Request to permit subdivision cif- 24 .0± acres into 62
single-family residential lots , and Lot "A" reserved
for waterway purposes , Lot "B" reserved for planted
area , Lot "C" reserved for common waterway access area ,
Lot "D" reserved for parking and marina facility, Lot
"E" reserved for park site and Lot 63 reserved for
commercial site.
Consideration of, these subjects was continued by the City Council
from the meeting of March 23 , 1970 to the meeting of April 27 , 1970 .
Members of the Council are requested to refer to information pre-
viously forwarded . In addition , the following supplementary actions
have taken place since preparation of the earlier report.
Action of Joint Harbor Committee and Harbor Commission
The Joint Harbor Committee has discussed the Promontory Bay project
T0: City Council - 2 .
at several meetings , and on April 14, 1970 voted to approve the
Promontory Bay project in principle , subject to the• following
conditions :
1 . The applicant must receive approval from the
Corps of Engineers .
2 . The applicant must receive approval from the City
of Newport Beach .
3 . The applicant must take precautions against
creating excess turbidity, as outlined in State
Resources letter of March 25 , 1970 .
Later that day at its regular meeting , the Harbor Commission
ratified the above. However, the Commissioners had some additional
thoughts which they wanted to convey to you . First , it was felt
that the ll ± acres to be dredged should be dedicated to a public
agency.
Second, the Commissioners felt that if maintenance dredging of the
area is necessitated because of storm damage or siltin from the
adjacent , undeveloped uplands , that the cost for such Ir. edging
should be the responsibility of the developer. This was a •concern
of the District staff in a memo to the Committee memb6rs(. '
The third concern was that, although engineers for the developer
indicated that the project will have no erosion effect ,On alboa
Island , some level of responsibility should be pldc_gd on t `� devel -
oper in the event adverse conditions might prevail.-
revail. ,
The City is awaiting correspondence from the U . S. Cor�� of. Engineers
prior to submitting the application for a Harbor OerMi �• to the Council
for its consideration .
Status of Waterways
The City Harbor and Tidelands Administrator, Publicr,ks ,birector
,
and Planning Director have investigated' questions int�¢l•ve4 in the
status of the proposed waterway designated as Lot "C'F on Tentative
Map of Tract No. 3867 and jointly recommend that fee ownership of
this waterway area be granted to the City of Newport Beach . This
might involve certain future obligations for maintenance , but would
clarify the responsibilities and powers of the City dnd ,simplify
administration and performance of municipal services
The Harbor and Tidelands Administrator is prepared tq report further
on this subject .
Sewerage
The City Public Works Director , City Engineer and Planning Director
jointly recommend that new local sewer lines be designed so that:
�V l
TO: City Council - 3 .
1 . All existing sewer users can be served by the
new lines .
2 . The existing sanitation district trunk sewer can
be abandoned and a surcharge condition in the
sanitation district facilities will not cause flood-
ing of any homes .
Respectfully submitted ,
Laurence Wilson
Planning Director
LW: hh
Council Meeting Date March 23 , 1970
Council Agenda Numbers G-5 , G,6 & G-7
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
March 18 , 1970
TO : City Council
FROM : Planning Commission
SUBJECT : Promontory Bay Project
Summary
At the meetings on February 5 , February 19 and March 5 , 1970 ,
the Planning Commission considered the following three aspects
of the Promontory Bay Development Project as submitted by the
Irvine Company :
1 . Master Plan Amendment No. 25
Proposal to amend Master Street and Highway Plan
by realigning Bayside Drive between East Coast
Highway and Jamboree Road (Marine Avenue) and
also to close a section of existing Bayside Drive
westerly of Jamboree Road (Marine Avenue) .
2. Use Permit Application No . 1466
Request to permit development of a residential
area of single-family dwelling units , with sup-
porting commercial and recreational facilities ,
to include a yacht basin and marina .
3 . Tentative Map Tract No . 3867
Request to permit subdivision of 24 .Ot acres into
62 single-family residential lots , and Lot "A"
reserved for waterway purposes , Lot "B" reserved
for planted area , Lot "C" reserved for common
waterway access area , Lot "D" reserved for parking
and marina facility , Lot "E" reserved for park
site and Lot 63 reserved for commercial site .
LOCATION : Portion of Block 94 of Irvine ' s Subdivision
located between Pacific Coast Highway and
Bayside Drive , west of Jamboree Road
(proposed Promontory Bay) .
ZONE : Uncldssified , C-N-H and R-3
APPLICANT/
OWNER: The Irvine Company , Newport Beach
TO : City Council - 2 .
The Commission arrived at specific conclusions and recommenda-
tions to the City Council on each of these related matters as
further detailed in the following sections of this report .
Recommendation
If desired , the following actions appropriately could be taken
by the City Council on March 23 , 1970 :
1 . Receive report of the Planning Commission regarding
Master Plan Amendment No . 25 ; set the date of
April 13 , 1970 , for City Council public hearing
to consider this proposed Master Plan Amendment .
2 . Receive report of the Planning Commission regarding
Use Permit No . 1466 ; continue this matter to the
City Council meeting of April 13 , 1970 .
3 . Receive report of the Planning Commission regarding
Tentative Map Tract No . 3867 ; continue this matter
to the City Council meeting of April 13 , 1970 .
4 . Set the date of April 13 , 1970 , for City Council
public hearing to consider request by the Irvine
Company for vacation of a portion of the right-of-
way of existing Bayside Drive at the location where
it would be interrupted by the proposed waterway.
Respectfu ly submitted ,
LAVRENCE WILSON
Planning Director
LW/kk
*TY OF NEWPORT BEA( Conn 9issiorvERs
*
to,71C
S1February 19 , 1970 u� > >£N'" �
Zone : "P-C"
Applicant: Donald L . Bren Company ,
Sherman Oaks
Ow r: The Irvine Company , Newport Beach
Plannin Director Wilson discussed this appli -
cation an the Chairman asked for comments .
Robert Bein , engineer for the developer, was
prepared to di lay the map which was pres t-
ed at the Parks , eaches & Recreation Co is-
sion meeting and w • ch was well receivX by
them. This applicati . involved th B&R
Commission because it i adjacent o a pro-
posed park , and the City unci previously
had specified that the ques • n of public or
private status of this par mu be resolved
prior to recording of fi 1 sub • ision maps
in this portion of th pper Harbo View Hills
Community .
After discussi Planning Director Wilso
stated that did not anticipate any prob-
lems , and mmissioner Brown made a motion NN
for appr al subject to the completion of re-
maini applicable conditions of approval as
est lished for Tentative Map of Tract 6938.
o that recommendation be made to the City
ouncil that the proposed park adjacent to IN
th,e westerly boundary of Tract 7028 be de- Motion x
signed and developed in such a way to be Second x
acceptable as a part of the City park system Abstain
in Newport Beach . Ayes x x x x x
Item 18
MASTER PLAN Proposal to amend Master Street and Highway
NDMENT Plan by realigning Bayside Drive between
East Coast Highway and Jamboree Road (Marine
samoomw� Avenue ) .
APPROVED
Dave Kaylor , Irvine Company ; James Taylor,
Irvine Company ; and Robert Bein , engineer ;
were present on this application . Due to -the
lateness of the meeting (approximately 12 : 00
midnight) , Chairman Jakosky asked the appli -
cants ' feelings about holding the matter over
for two weeks . Mr. Taylor felt very strongly
that the matter must be heard inasmuch as
Page 10.
PITY OF NEWPORT BEAR COMMISSIONERS
N N N N p N c1
February 19 , 1970
it had been held over from the previous
meeting and two more weeks ' delay would cause
undue expense and hardship . The meeting pro-
ceeded with Mr. Kaylor answering questions of
the Commission . Chairman Jakosky closed the
public hearing but as discussion by the Com-
mission became more involved , the hearing was
reopened by motion of Commissioner Glass ,
seconded by Commissioner Dosh , approved unani -
mously .
After further discussion and closing of the
public hearing , motion was made and passed
that Master Plan Amendment No . 25 be approved
subject to Staff recommendations :
1 . That the Bayside Shopping Center parking
lot be redesigned to the satisfaction
of the Planning Director, and construct-
ed concurrently with construction of
realigned Bayside Drive .
2 . That access requirements to the Shark Motion x
Island Yacht Club and the adjacent Second x
apartments be restored to the satis- Aye x x x xx
faction of the Planning Director. Nay x
Item 19
USE PERMIT Request to permit development of a residential
N0. 1466 area of single-family dwelling units , with
supporting commercial and recreational faci -
APPROVED lities , to include a yacht basin and marina.
Location : Portion of Block 94 of Irvine ' s
Subdivision located between
Pacific Coast Highway and Bayside
Drive , west of Jamboree Road
(proposed Promontory Bay) .
Zone: Unclassified , C-N-H and R-3
Applicant: The Irvine Company , Newport Beach
Owner: Same as applicant.
Planning Director Wilson read the application
and Commissioner Glass asked if the applicant
were agreeable to the conditions recommended
in the Staff report . Mr. Taylor stated that
they were not in agreement with Condition No . 5
Page 11 .
~ OTY OF NEWPORT BEAR �OMMy1SSIONERS
O y J S S
N N N.N Oiy W J
� O S 0 7 N S
February 19, 1970
regarding the requirement of a separate use
permit for the proposed marine development
of Parcel 2 . After discussion , the Chairman
closed the public hearing and Commissioner
Adkinson made a motion for approval of Use
Permit 1466 with modified Staff recommenda-
tions as follow:
1 . That approval of Use Permit No. 1466
be subject to satisfactory demonstra-
tion of the engineering feasibility of
the proposed lagoon design and issuance
of a harbor permit. (See report to
Joint Harbor Committee from City of
Newport Beach Harbor and Tidelands
Administrator attached. )
2. That an amendment to the Master Street
and Highway Plan is approved.
3. That Parcel No . 3 and Parcel No. 4
be approved in principle only and be
subject to a separate use permit for
each of the two parcels .
4. The Irvine Company will undertake to
rezone Parcel No. 9 to single-family
residential and Parcel No . 1 , to
include any designated channel cut ,
to an unclassified district.
5 . Parcel No. 2 subject to approval of- Motion. x
Planning Director; however, Planning Second x
Commission does not waive any part of Abstain x
the parking requirements of the parcel . Ayes x x x x x
Item . 20
TENTATIVE Request to permit subdivision of 24. 0± acres
MAP TRACT into 62 residential lots , and Lot "A" re-
do. 3861., served for waterway purposes , Lot "B" re-
served for plahte:d axe.a., Lot, ".C" r•ese.rued.
C0T. TNUED. for common waterway access area , Lot " D"
UNTIL *MA4( reserved for parking and marina facility ,
Lot "E" reserved for park site and Lot 63
reserved for commercial site .
Location : Portion of Block 94 of Irvine ' s
Subdivision located between
Pacific Coast Highway and Bay-
side Drive , west of Jamboree
Road (Promontory Bay ) .
Page 12 .
` ItTY OF NEWPORT BEA* COMMISSIONERS
6
O0 -�
February 19 , 1970 0 3
Zone : Unclassified , C-N-H and R-3
Applicant : The Irvine Company , Newport Beach
Owner: Same as applicant .
Mr. James Taylor, representing the Irvine
Company , asked that the Planning Commission
hold this application over until the next
Commission meeting (March 5 , 1970 ) because
of the late hour (approaching 2 :00 A. M. ) .
Chairman Jdkosky recommended such action Motion x
and suggested that Staff place this matter Second x
as Item 1 on the next agenda. All Ayes
***********************
On motion of Commissioner Brown , seconded by
Commissioner Adkinson , and carried , the
meeting was adjourned .
Don R. Adkinson , Secretary
Planning Commission
Page 13.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY ATTORNEY
Department
TO: City Clark DATE: March lid„ 1970
FROM: City Attorney
SUBJECT : (1) sesolution adopt ia� a wwp s a Patton of a
cortain shoat kno a as ltysi�da 1�rirra which is
praposcd to be vacated, albgad ups " allW d
(2) Resolution 4401aring its Antonti a► to order tho
closing up vacation and aft of a portiagi
f a amain atrest JT= as in
Transmitted are copies of tha Abe" pvoposod rsaolutimw ;for
"ontation to the Council at the wwtb*i a with tboe Moomtorl >Iay Prortdi< lMrah hard in
coons a
City Attorney
us"&
Att.
oat City F? ri:i� r
running Vivocrar
P"lia Works Diaeoatar
!1 ,
ANJ AUA"14,W* 46'ia 4 k()4Xh t,P A CZAM4
'the clt:y Gou: "L tuff. the clty'vg New*,,=4 Uschl, p ar"s6aa nu
to tb4 Pr:avis11co r o "ta xies t, a t: t:rr + : « 11141v" and salt
awndlw a%s
"TION I ,rtx Prx4I1): intcrts+i; *ad CoC'iva Alerwe raquire
tha uluo tus, up Alttd *UwJv' rt 04 as i+araw of a cor ca irk
knolm au )$Oyslav, juxk4t. ill ay. City of bsawpart beaaAl to oricr the
LallawivS 4,ts4erlbod, parl4f' a OZ t41.6 satroct irk tits i�vlrry cat kkwPc:rt
waah. Co4utCy o tiiraA a, Z4aatc icl Wiforaisr► to bit vacutL"j
ulosasd up atr4 aMb4wL-md� 0 47lUs
TbQoo ia4x"Ue rah S1tvk 94 ct U4rl.nuO2 WbU'LviiUm
as Own on 44 u4p tucreog, rgcQr44,,d ia'r lsOL.k. Is paze 66
of 944,..x4 43taps o tr:Oxjs su Gra.`%4 cQus, q,
CalifkZrAla„ agsiulba4A as 1411was
at ail ar,,&l* point lu the Southerly ri,&ht-
ok'-waty Ul w vjl A*ys,ide "rive its k:taWyaad to tires 40u41::y
of Crrrut�a by degQ rL40rr4kta in Aock 030t ire 217 gar
OEfi.�lx41 ReCords# »"'.b'.`.Qr,;A Vi; said (.r4UTAW raRQX`ktYa
4ialifor4a34, ufaW isol a.'t Uv.Wg ia, 1 1/2 a .Y.rL`n PIPe and r oil
aa4 airmm Qn a rap of 'Trstws h`M. 4J)3= *4:;rt)ad laa 444"
Isax pages 13 %aww$14 190 :#.44M Uvlvo„ VI: MlsCOL144eou*
&*no ;rsctrds of Isud cat;v%e 404nxy, G iiis jai a; thelt4e
ataos aaJ41 SsyUthdrly right-of-WAy tine xrl Snayslde i)r iv *
South 84 40 33" r astx 124Z.W :Ck9lr L. 41st �Zfue ievirtt
$o o1 IAU tlpial -ut ` 31 sta 4; g p dhzrlyy r&rUf-
wxy liras ug itray$Ija* lrisre # di.artauQe vt 716* 41 I"tet; ;-v
ckw beegiluxi4 c4 Q4 aC's 4.'i a r; s' rZ% d4nk E4Q"1 sSavv
haX'ius a Y;AwlUO (di 4`t2go'j Ucts a 3:adiol Ure Julrz m ;R414
beginnix% bears K6&U% ;A* 13' 27 ti tbcr.,=:."i .Hord tvxts rly
axaanl� �aaa3�d uG+aa,� vx�r ti ax erxtraal* it of 23" 541 5V
aa>n saw 31sta nat 49 37�* r tia at to �t lvz at 21ne parallel
with owd 7'7*00r fear. �rthtrlY V� $444 S0141'Ardy rlaho-aaf-_
Ji wady be of lis�rairda» �� � a rraadiol, x've rrow "*Ad voi t
bearx borth gg 121 1911 r A st; Vhwmm North 440 ,461 33 ,
Wear alcoog said VaXaUej line ar► distAnce of 303.46 iaer
to thea WgUalog of aat 1�tvtaN ,Ant curve* concaavet Wa+sto rly',
laviu& * VA41us of Z 13 goof 0 A Xa�uil St LIM f e Mail
bay invitg bears St1 t4 71 30, 4V �7eat; tiva nce Uouthorrilr
An Watsterly Along sald cam, theoaagh a at tzal angle ,
113" 341 W, mA are: adistatM& UR IQ9* E3 fCOZ sa the TIMA
Mid 9,
4hN. blw a t'ab onglo point iv'a tixe SQUtherly right-
at-way line of asysido orivre At 4onvoyed to the couaaty of
mcawas cords of laird lamp cou tyl I14 1a ssaidl
;paint being a 1 IM; itIn pipe *Ad v 411, sWvaat on aof Tta 4r~ No, 4,.dp3„ T940 44 in Awk 160v l+a9aai 13 tWsa�
19, Inalusiva„ pf Miscellaneous X#paa, xaaco dx of said
4rarnge County W o=i.aa; thence 4O Sold U0vthaazly
right-04,0way j a Zsyside dri,vevsQ zth V 46 33 14st,
lI 0.60 ftea. thanzo lc,4v b* saaka ;aouthor ly right ark-z+ay
linen N,,rth 3� 131 27" f':aat# 69*34 itat to that gut L'oa OU
of isaginuing ug. thio CA03o S tinny, raai,d poiUt baaing In aa, "
moutaaarygaazzr» turrms c:c a��avd' i�nrt�avae aataarly, haaving, a radiusa+f i00*00 f6at* i r'ad7" line at SAW point beaa4x is VWa
19* 40 107, Wcaat thov.44 Wor Lbtantorrly along SAW o»urrvaa:.
ahrougt ,ea ctnuvai aaczglaa rrk U" 59* xb"`„ an aarre OistaaY>vR Of
15.69 faat; ti 4ns *a mut", C"t to said ati;f►�vrea wrth fie461
33`" Wast,, 13^66 ;UCWj thkZce South Y"' 13 27 ' W44t, 7,70
foa t to t W T1`4aA kvInt sin; Bgxluon3ang«
All that vorz yza t*f said *treat to be v AUaaz44* alosed UP
MW abandoned
ink ra.nlculy ohown on m, z"ran W approv%"4 �
^*Vtod by thae City Ccaunxil of the zesty vfWkvpovt $vuh for Said
waesaatia>ua, closiox up an4aDaremownts by asoluti-oh NO* „.....*,�,„
"tid X",zh 23" 100 vahioh Said p is on 9110 In than OflUt 0-9
the city CIO* of chc City cf rkwPoxt Asaeho, "faare um is haraoby
as" to said asap for furthat partictilAX4 as to the laxax*arad
ve"tivnj* 010bi.lig up Ana a baaft4onmot U *aaid. yCr4ion, of said strsaatfA
and said map in jiAdo a part 04 th s resaxitation by th10 Tefaar'e A4*
to the sae* raatvut a rd puoose as U it walla iavcaXParwtad 119014
'4 in full.
4 w�N
I�
i
�►a xx za p c sdlc s far thi wIosjzj; 4P god
a�+Mader m rat of tm aa44X0%Ata rom an of said street: sty bu
awd taken,, Oxid U% CII;Y !: 1W v"�. I Of rAW City Of NOWW g ►a'+ ig4h k1*awiUy
Quats to P40440a w4cv t1w.. provloiona cif Ott "SUV aL V048tlan Aat
of 1541v" mW all a A**nt* rrt*# bOL4& 540kiOnS 000 tau 034
inalvsfvr'v t7rf 4F►M 5tre*ts ,avil V;- jtawatys Coda of tbo $ta za of
a3nliforafa«
4�I Tbctr* t Sapar3rt+tradakzt: of tbR city apt;
Newport leach shol,l �4uuwu to W 4un.0pl,=ua4y posted xUA& ;kw luw �
of tba portion of slid strsat" propuse4i'w 'vvAted x:or, mova thon
300 fwsat,aq A Ct, but 004 Us* tIW4, xlaress $A' 411A hOtict*s Of UW
vocation of said portion of said stme4w 4410 Xiotices $buull state
the pass%* of tttU t"oluatn Of lutdatt`on And taw tiff and place
of the b"rirS of All, psa~sCUS J .atera,atzad :Vo gar. ota 60tittX to tM
proposed vaustion of SAW portion of said strost, Said INCtIC00
OWL be so posted air. least t*a 4sys taeloa;t the dare of 0414
h"ris*s, sl.l, an requilma by lwolh
SECTION 4o =�im LC 1MV44 ► SI V4u thAt thu City CO W1411
at th* City of lg'wpGru ucaoh 40*� hertUy fix Kmdays the » 44y
of IV04 azt ,t"ac3', hour of 700 p,mo Of ssid
dalk is the tAouzcOU C40Mb4Xft Caf the City Of ktaaapart y4cuh*' loxat*d
in the City Mail, or, the CIS€ of Nouporu �a.:xzh# as the t~:fm and plsuaa
for beariag TALI paCacsons inttarasted ixz car objaatxlr19 W the proposed
vawti,m of ,xaaid purtlou Of .said straea:, and the CRlty Counoil at
said eisra stcd place. will boar the *vidotwe offarod by Aby person
Interested in the va tlon or. *mod portion of W+d street herain-
Wore desari Kdo
UCTION S. 714 j ilcasoiution Of 'lnt*atl0ft Sbsll be pub -
lishsd at least a<atoa is t4u tafficiatl. xaamsrpopa:r of the Cityp And
avid puW,,.ar,4AOYA OU411 b* %i4ot baforo the 44te, W S'Or the U i %
{
A IXSr
MY MOM
e4w
A RLSCiU)TION OF TRZ cXITY CCllNGM or al%
op i. o11 =AM a�'Tlt* A XW S804M A
tog 0 A Ole AU SaTUL OClSeiS[ AS SAYSIOZ
Dt �0iSI+D yid 71 Y.�SDa �55
UP MJ A6"IZU
hags pr Sentat to t W-.Y co'U' XI U of th+a City of Xevport Aasar4h ax
arrtaixi MW 413tia;l0d "A30 MW OF A POUION Or li YSIOZ DPAUP"
baiap, City of 1kwpart baa ah vubuiz Wvxk—x D*paxtt nt 1*4wiar g )kc p
t/W-5177-L, darted $Aral% 2^(), 1970, mhowin& a portion of "y'sides
Drive In the City 'Or 1Owpttt avach u4ich; taut city is izousidering
va►"tius, clalixig up &ICA. 0*XWo-AiT4i And ch 'iaiction is vo r+a
Thm portii a s of,aloj;k 94 of Irvixx0m SabdIVISi.csn *a
ashom on 0 "V s hOVQQf, 9e,:03:04 fit boom ,L,. .piN, 4 Of
�iecral.lancc�a$ »tcl � �s, �'C%GKi�� �� �zaa �atinty�i
Califaxuirt, slatsrxaciE�ad As coli'Oval
INNU4 At an angle p61att in the Southerly" r.,S4t-01-
Way 1100 of SAYAi+l41 DrAvVO 48 COMOy44 tca Chi. CO ty 09 WMVP
by daa«d zscoiNeu in book 030i ##ga Z1.7 of o fieiAl Ucordox
naarda of 6"d bra%u "=- 1.if+xxy:3as, atad aint. Doing
a 1 1/2" iron yaipv and jtaail as mjwwn on a4 map of Tract W,
4003, r+ecardod lig ACQI� labs p as 13 th=4h 19* i"lusi"s
of Mts4as41ancous V►pdaw =c ,Vua of sold tOrmw* ComtYs
Cwaliira; +ias1 ti xca aticaa�$ eniai tat rly tet*of,-vay- Tina;
of Fsyaidan 4,ari.'wa, �uuth 54" 461 33 ' kustg4�.�4 facet to
the Tow ,point of saSi i�l# of this d,Rs;caript ap; thencc
aonti%mlia& South 54' 40 33 ` ust ajang oasid Southerly right
of-way luaanuof baysldt, Drive a410%; t4a of 116*41 feat to
ba tamp ba�a ra i a� t6k i3 �4 .atatl t1 sa6aat ttoacthr�reitattrly"
atlOs aasir3t +:rzr�re, tcs'► i anal au 3csz .�3' Spa 3 'I.
am asz; dirty rc: tM to as ts nC in as 7.irtrs lsaxaall+ai
vith aunt 1I eo 14rt 1 a t rX1* of araair rly a h bear ray
' ti.aa caf Salrasi.ds. l�ri.vDy a �suiaal. l.i f � sad pvixtt bras
r .
• a
North 0* 121 15e1 Wit` #:csastwe Wrt".a W' 46* 33 W*xt alo
saelw Parsual. 1. Aa 411s4 a of W3,46 'feet: to the bogivarU
of ra mmtllC ent m4rve ' :4VA rive wo starlyt iw,4 :a rAdju* of
3h uo foot* � %'�1s�W line J:r4m; satO b�sga.VVIVa agars $Qutb
71x 361 " Wont; tbAndw Southerly and W40t*rrly alcas said
s:tsmjs throu&h a utntrrxI augl+a vZ 113' 34' 41", aun aka
'istm" of 09*03 Aot to tbo 'True folut of S+egiriaing, of
this ddscrript Out
beL
OWIWf at atn angle point iu thkv Southerly right:-a,f-
way Um aaf MAyastae driver 'as conva yod 0 the County Uf
orat %# by deed >+a;ordod, lts AWAI. 830% pagan 217 of official
1 at�rgYc1M�, rat'trr4s of SAW Giaasgq County t:atl.l,foral a, said
paint b*IUS a1112 ' 'i-ron, vivo aald nail as shown an as
of Trro at Not 40030 x*ao rded t,sx gook 188, pft*as 13 throust
rip, iuAluxive, oz, liis44011eutstaurs kup s, xaaord s art• *al.##
craraasagat iCountl►, " forni4t .tHa n,44 along said Southerly
a; c-saf�wsarsy lIn t of 14yside iativ*# South 84* 40 33`' Brit$
t�.tr feed 1 thwaacae leaving said Southerly right-of-waxy
ILA* Worth 5" 431 27 Sa *t, 9*3U feet to the 'Trues kayintr
Ot gimim L* thIs aauY.:ripxiatz, said point beug iu a
i outang it carrgC, v 1.'ltVta �rctrtt> reKaerl a 'hen' Ing, ^ rmii,ua i?
it14.QR faeast, a radial linen at; val.4 pa►lns: ,bes*rs North 1.9
Gila loll Wgmt; tht'nze tYGrrtaaausstasa<ly &ion# said curve tarough
a contrral wigle ok- V 594 Zb'', an arry Oistamet of 15.69
foot:l Ow me e r`aorntur%Qnt. to, uatld "urtvo North 40 461 33 '
WoUt 13.66 ;levt; �bAm;a Iovuth �5 131 awl" 'A st, 7.7a foot,
to 3e xj=et JiMt of 13tginxtitz.
approved Anj *Optt3, And the City Cl* k LO or dar'aaaO and diretarted
to than tht same,, in txxe proarlt+edings for the asbandorownt of said
pardon of raid aRlrk t� ,
"Ma this !;�Vj day 09 &tdjja,.127A*
ys�ar
AMSTt
C7 O
� t
Planning Commeion Meeting Feb . 19 , 1970
Items No . 18 , 19 & 20
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
February 13 , 1970
TO: Planning Commission
FROM : Planning Department
SUBJECT: Master Plan Amendment No . 25 ( Item 18)
Proposal to amend Master Street and Highway Plan
by realigning Bayside Drive between East Coast
Highway and Jamboree Road (Marine Avenue) and also
to close a section of existing Bayside Drive west-
erly of Jamboree Road (Marine Avenue ) .
Use Permit Application No . 1466 ( Item 19)
Request to permit development of a residential
area of single family dwelling units , with support-
ing commercial and recreational facilities , to in-
clude a yacht basin and marina.
Tentative Map Tract No . 3867 ( Item 20 )
Request to permit subdivision of 24. 0± acres into
6-2. residential lots , and Lot "A" reserved for
waterway purposes , Lot "B" reserved for planted
area , Lot "C" reserved for common waterway access
area, Lot "D" reserved for parking and marina
facility, Lot "E" reserved for park site and
Lot 63 reserved for commercial site .
LOCATION : Portion of- Block 94 of Irvine ' s Subdivision located
between Pacific Coast Highway and Bayside Drive , west
of Jamboree Road (proposed Promontory Bay) .
ZONE : Unclassified , C-N-H and R-3
APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
Background
Use Permit No. 1466 was continued from the meeting of January 15 , 1970
at the request of staff and the Irvine Company. Subsequently the Plan-
ning Commission continued Master Plan Amendment No . 25 , Use Permit No .
1466 , and Tentative Map Tract No. 3867 at the meeting of February 5 ,
1970 .
The staff report previously prepared for the meeting of February 5 ,
1970 is still pertinent and should be reviewed concurrently With this
report.
TO: Planning Commission - 2 .
Master Plan Amendment No , 25
This application requests approval to realign Bayside Drive
between East Coast Highway and Jamboree Road , and to close a
section of existing Bayside Drive westerly of Jamboree Road .
Approval of this application would require that the information
presented show to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission
that the amendment to the Master Street and Highway Plan as con-
templated would not have a detrimental effect on adjacent pro-
perties , the neighborhood , or the community.
The proposed amendment could have the following benefits :
1 . The new alignment would be more direct than
the existing alignment .
2. An existing sharp curve would be eliminated .
3 . Direct access to the arterial street would be
eliminated from approximately 12 homes having
garages so located as to require backing onto
the street .
4 . An existing poor intersection connecting Harbor
Island Road to the arterial street would be
greatly improved .
5 . The easterly entrance to Beacon Bay could be
opened and made usable.
6 . Access to any future development north of the
proposed realignment could be taken directly
from Bayside Drive .
The proposed amendment could raise the following questions :
1 . The operators of businesses located on the Balboa
Yacht Basin property (land leased from City of
Newport Beach ) believe they could be adversely
affected by the lower traffic volumes on existing
Bayside Drive .
2 . The proposed realignment would necessitate re-
designing a portion of the Bayside Shopping Center
parking lot.
3 . A portion of the apartments along the south side of
Bayside Drive adjacent to the Shark Island Yacht
Club would not have direct access to the proposed
realigned Bayside Drive.
It is the opinion of staff that Bayside Drive would more efficiently
V _
• •
TO : Planning Commission - 3„
serve the community in the capacity of a secondary highway in the
proposed realigned location . Staff, therefore , recommends ap-
proval of this application subject to the following conditions :
1 . That the Bayside Shopping Center parking lot be
redesigned to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director , and constructed concurrently with con-
struction of realigned Bayside Drive.
2 . That access requirements to the Shark Island
Yacht Club and the adjacent apartments be
restored to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director.
Use Permit Application No. 1466
This application requests approval of the general land use concept
of parcels 1 , 2 , 30 4 and 9 as shown on the proposed land use plan
submitted by the Irvine Company. Approval of this application
would require that the proposed use of these parcels would be com-
patible with and not detrimental to the ordinary maintenance , devel -
opment and redevelopment of the surrounding area as determined by
the Planning Commission .
It is the opinion of Staff that the lagoon and surrounding single
family residential development would be compatible with the gen-
eral character of the surrounding area and the Newport Tomorrow
Goals Report which stresses a harbor related environment .
It is also the feeling of Staff that commercial uses of Parcels
#2 , 3 and 4 could be compatible with the surrounding land uses .
However, more detailed information regarding these parcels would
be desirable , and they are not subject to further review if un-
conditionally approved under this use permit.
It is the opinion of Staff that the proposed Promontory Bay Devel -
opment concept would be an asset to the community over alternative
traditional developments . Staff, therefore , recommends approval
of Use Permit No. 1466 subject to the following conditions :
1 . That approval of Use Permit No. 1466 be subject
to satisfactory demonstration of the engineering
feasibility of the proposed lagoon design and
issuance of a harbor permit. (See report to
Joint Harbor Committee from City of Newport Beach
Harbor and Tidelands Administrator attached. )
2 . That an amendment to the Master Street and Highway
Plan is approved.
TO: Planning Commission - 4,
3. That Parcel No . 4 be approved in principal only ,
and be subject to a separate use permit.
4 . That final plans for the relocation of the Shark
Island Yacht Club on Parcel No. 3 be subject to
approval of the Planning Director.
5 , That Parcel No. 2 (parking and marina facility)
be approved in principal only , and be subject to
a separate use permit.
Tentative Map Tract No . 3867
This application requests approval of the Tentative Tract Map for
Lots 1 through 63 and Lots "A" through "E" as shown on- the tenta-
tive map which coincides with Parcels 1 , 2 , 4 and 9 as shown on
the Land Use Plan for Use Permit No. 1466 .
A detailed description of the development characteristics was in-
cluded in the Staff report of February 5 , 1970 , and will not be
repeated in this report. However, there are other important
matters yet to be resolved .
Section 19 . 20 . 050 of the Municipal Code requires - "when the front
of any lots abuts any major , primary or se��cond��ar,�� street or high-
way ; the subdivider shall be required to e�dicafe and i'mprove a
service road to provide ingress or egress to and from such lots
The Irvine Company has asked a waiver of this requirement
stating the following reasons :
1 , Traffic studies presented by consultants for the
Irvine Company indicate a potential reduction in
average daily traffic on Bayside Drive to 6 ,500
vehicles from the present flow of 13 ,000 to 16 ,000
vehicles . This is based on anticipated diversion
of traffic following completion of the Pacific
Coast Freeway.
2. The Irvine Company proposes driveways along
realigned Bayside Drive with adequate turn-
around areas provided so that vehicles need not
back into the street.
3. The Irvine Company states that their studies
indicate that a service road will not provide
a more desirable environment or enhance the
marketability of the lots in this proposed
development .
4. Reduction of existing curb cuts now taking access
onto Bayside Drive from 18 to 12 or 17 to 11 .
TO : Planning Commission - 5 .
The Planning Department believes a waiver of the service road
requirement should be denied for the following reasons :
1 . The Staff agrees that there could be a diversion
of traffic when the freeway is completed and
that Bayside Drive could function with driveway
accesses . However , Bayside Drive is classified
as a secondary highway with a 45 m. p. h . speed
limit. Even if present traffic volumes should
be reduced , at these speeds it would not be
desirable to front single family residences on
Bayside Drive . Furthermore , due to minimum lot
area and maximum building coverage , driveways
fronting on this street will be one of the main
areas for children to play.
2 . Due to minimum front yard setbacks and traffic
volumes , environmental qualities are jeopardized
by fumes and noise levels . A frontage road would
provide additional separation .
3. It will be a minimum of eight years until the
freeway will be opened for traffic .
4. In the location of the previously approved
turnaround type drives , Bayside Drive is not
serving in the capacity of a secondary highway.
With a parking lane to Bayside Drive which
could possibly limit sight distances and the
increased speed limit , the turnaround type
driveway is less desirable in this location .
Environmental values represent the essentially intangible , un-
quantifiable essence of a community ' s character and meaning.
The Planning Department believes that these values should not
be compromised.
Staff has previously noted the minimum setbacks as shown on the
tentative map are within the minimum requirements of- applicable
ordinances . However, front yard setback lines may be determined
by the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 19 . 20 . 110 (c)
of the Municipal Code . Staff believes that strict conformance to
minimum provisions of the ordinance could produce a very static
and sterile environment, both from land and water. Staff suggests
that the Irvine Company file a setback plan as a part of this
application allowing for variation of front and rear setback lines .
Staff recommends approval of Tentative Map Tract No. 3867 subject
to the following conditions :
1 . That final approval be subject to the approval
of Use Permit 1466 and the conditions thereto .
TO : Planning Commission - 6.
2. That final approval of the subdivision be subject
to approval of an appropriate revision to the
Master Plan of Streets and Highways . (Public
hearings required. )
3. That final approval of the subdivision be subject
to the abandonment of certain existing public
rights-of-way as contemplated and to satisfactory
arrangements being made for dedication and im-
provement of the new rights-of-way required.
(Public hearing required. )
4. That final approval of the subdivision be subject
to satisfactory arrangements being made to re-
locate existing facilities of the Orange County
Sanitation District and of other affected utilities .
5 . That Section 19 . 20 . 050 of the Municipal Code re-
quiring a service road not be waived , and that
the cross section for realigned Bayside Drive
shall be in accordance with Alternate "C" of
the attached drawings .
6. That access to Lots 27 through 34, 42 through 44
(and unless a frontage road is provided - all
parcels along realigned Bayside Drive ) , be pro-
vided by means of drives located on common lot
lines , each drive serving two parcels ; and that
adequate turnaround areas be provided so that
vehicles need not back into the street. Cross
easements or non-barrier agreements satisfactory
to the City Attorney shall be provided so as to
guarantee perpetuation of the access arrangement .
7. That unless a frontage road is provided , the
right-of-way width of realigned Bayside Drive
be at least 86 feet and the curb-to-curb width
be at least 70 feet. This cross section will
provide for 4 travel lanes , 2 eight foot wide
parkways , a twelve foot wide median left turning
lane and an eight foot wide parking lane on the
southerly side . (Alternate " B" on the attached
drawings . )
8. That the new cul -de-sac be located entirely on
the developer ' s land.
9. That the design of the new intersections of re-
aligned Bayside Drive with existing Bayside
Drive be subject to review and approval by the
City .
TO : Planning Commission - 7.
10. That all improvements be constructed as required
by ordinance and the Public Works Department.
11 . That the boundary of the final tract may be
checked by the County Surveyor before being sub-
mitted to the City for approval .
12 . That all grading be in accordance with grading
plans and reports approved by the Public Works
Director and a qualified Soils Engineer. Upon
completion of the 'grading the Civil Engineer
and the Soils Engineer shall certify that the
grading has been completed in accordance with
the plans , the soils report and the grading
ordinance . Reproducible copies of the plans on
standard size sheets shall be furnished to the
Public Works Department .
13. That the connecting street southeasterly of
Lot "B" be 52 feet in width between exterior
curbs in order to provide for a twenty foot
entering roadway , an eight foot median and a
twenty-four foot exiting roadway.
14. That all driveways be a minimum of twenty feet
in length from the property line to ensure no
parking will be in the public right-of-way.
15. The portion of Lot " E" not included in the
public right-of-way , resulting from the closing
of Bayside Drive , be dedicated to the City , and
the existing right-of-way of Bayside Drive west
of the proposed waterway be retained under public
control .
16. A length of tangent be provided between the two
reversing curves at the east end of the develop-
ment adjacent to the existing Bayside Shopping
Center.
17. Parkway trees be installed on all public rights-
of-ways in accordance with Parks , Beaches and
Recreation Department specifications .
18. Appropriate landscaping be installed on all
slopes and vacant spaces resulting from this
development.
19. A setback plan allowing for a variation of
front and rear setback lines be submitted to
the Planning Director for approval .
----
TO : Planning Commission - &
20 . That there be no City financial obligations
connected with construction of realigned
Bayside Drive.
21 . That realigned Bayside Drive be constructed to
its full width in connection with the develop-
ment of Tract 3867.
RODNEY L . GUNN
Assistant Planner
RLG/kk
Attachments : Report to Joint Harbor Committee
from Harbor Administrator
Typical Cross Sections
Land Use Plan
�TY OF NEWPORT BEACO COMMISSIONERS
Minutes of: , Adjourned Meeting of Planning Commission
Date : March 5 , 1970
Time : 8:00 P. M. 7Z N
Place : Council Chambers
ROLL CALL• Commissioners Present: x x 'x ,x x xx
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ;
Present: ; Laurence Wilson , Planning ;Director.
Dennis O' Neil , Asst . Ci'ty •Attorney,
I
STAFF MEMB •RS
Present: • ;James E. ' Nuzum, Associate Planner
Rodney L. Gunn , Assistant' Planner ' . ' .•.' :;
WiIIiam -R•. - Foley, Zoning Inspector• •
Kay, Kamm
MINUTES 'On • motion• of .Commissioner Brown , seconded by:':,:' : ; :, . •- -
Commissioner Dosh', and carried, the .mi•nutes•
of- February 19 , 1970 , ' were approved.
Chairman ' Jakosky made' ann•ouncements , on the
•following items :
1 :•;. Variances and use permits become effective. -
fifteen days after action by Planning Com-
mission . Appeals on action -may' be made in.
writing .to the City Clerk ' s office within
fifteen days after meeting. .
2 . The Planning Commission will make a definit
effort to end the Commission meetin•gs • by
11 : 30 P . M. Any application which has not
been heard by 11 : OO .will be continued until
the following meeting and every effort will
be made to place-, continued items at the be-
ginning of .-the agenda. The last Commission
meeting ran until 2 : 00 A. M. , and it follows
that discussions at that time of the morn'in
are, not completely fair to the applicants • ;
or to the C,i ty .
Item 1
'TENTATIVE' Request to permit subdivision of 24.0± acres
MAP TRACT into 62 residential lots , and Lot "A".• reserved `
NO. 3867 for waterway- purposes , - Lot "B" reserved for
planted area , Lot "C" resorved for common 'water .
APPROVED way access a.rea, Lot• "D" reserved for parking '
Page, 1
ATY OF NEWPORT BEAC0 COMMISSIONERS
March. 5 , 1970
and marina facility , Lot "E" reserved for park-
site and Lot• 63 reserved for commercial site'; .
Location : . "Por. tion of Block 94 of Irvine ' s
' Subdi-vision located between Pacifi
Coast Highway and Bayside Drive , "
west'• of Jamboree Road (Promontory.
gay)
Zone : 'Unclassified , C-N-H 'and •R-3
Applicant-: The Irvine Company , •Newport Beach'
Owner : Same as applicant .
Planning Director Wilson presented the applica-
tion to the Commission , with Associate Planner
Nuzum pointing out the location of the various
items on the wall map. Mention was made of the
'fact that at the Planning Commission meeting . of. •
February 19 , •1970 ,• Master Plan Amendment 25 and .
Use Permit 1466 , •both Pertaini-ng to this • same • '
location , were heard and approved by the Plan-
ning Commission .•
Mr. Jack Raub and Mr. Bob Bein of Raub , Bein ,
Frost & Assoc. were present ; also Mr. Dave Kayl r ,,_
and Mr. Jim Taylor of the Irvine Company. Chai
man Jakosky expressed concerri regarding the wid h, `
of the entrance channel into Promontory Bay , - an
this was discussed .' Also discussed were the
progress of other, agencies involved (such as
the Corps of Engineers and Harbor Department) ,.
the status of the frontage road , the matter of
grading of the cliff and the entrance roads to
the mesa . The Irvine representatives expressed , -
disagreement with Conditions 5 and 19• of -the
Staff report which were then reviewed .
Commissioner Watson moved that Tentative Map Tr ct `' •
No. 3867 be approved subject to .Staff condition
as follow:
1 . That final' approval be subject to the
approval of Use Permit 1466 -and the
conditions . thereto .
•2 . - ' That• final approval of the subdivision '
be subject 'to ap'proval' •of - an appropriate
revision to ,the Master P1•an of••Streets
:and Highways ., . (Public hearings required
Page 2 . .
*7Y OF NEWPORT BEAR COMMISSIONERS
March 5 , 1970
3.' That final approval of 'the subdivision
be subject .to the abandonment of certain
existing public rights-of-way as contem-
plated and .to satisfactory arrangements "_-
-being .made• for dedication and improvemen '
of the new rights-of-way required . (Pub ic '
hearing .required. } "
4. , That final approval of the subdivision b
subject to satisfactory arrangements be-
ing made to relocate existing facilities ' •;.,; - ; .
of the .Orange County Sanitation District
and of other affected utilities .
5 . That Section 19 .20 . 050 of the Municipal
Code requiring a service road not be
waived, and .that the 'cross section for `
realigned Bayside Drive shall, be in acco d-
ance with 'Alterna'te " C" of the attached
drawings .
6 . That access to Lots 27 through 34 , 42 '
- through 44 (and unless a frontage road
is pro•vi.ded - all parcels along realigne
Bayside Drive ) ,• be provided by means of
drives located on common lot lines , each
drive serving two parcels ; and that ade-
quate turnaround areas be provided so
that vehicles need .not back' into the street.• '' ' ''. .
Cross eas,ements or non-barrier agreement
satisfactory to the City Attorney shall �e
, provided so as• to guarantee perpetuation
of the access arrangement.
7. That unless a frontage road is provided ,
the right-of-way width of realigned Bay-
side Drive be at least 86 ' and the curb-
to-curb width •be at least 70 ' . This cro s
section will provide -for 4 travel lanes ,
2 eight foot wide parkways , a 12 ' wide
median left turning lane an.d an 8' wide
parking lane 'on the souther.ly side .
(Alternate "B" on the attached drawings .
8. That the new cul -de-sac be Iocated' entir )y ,.
• on the devel'oper' s 'l and.
9 . That the design of the new intersections
of- realigned Bayside Drive with existing
Bayside Drive be -subject to review and '
approval: by, the City .
Page 3.,.
• '*TY OF N EW ORT BEA(* COMMISSIONERS
Fly, o• �, J`r ,
. K
March 5 , •1970 r o`N1
10. . "That all improvements be' constructed as
required by ordinance and the Public
Works Department .
11 .. 'That the boundary` of the final tract may
be checked by the County Surveyor before ' .
being submitted to the City for approval .
. 12 . . That all grading be in accordance with {
grading plans and reports approved by th
Public Works Director and a 'qualified
Soils Engineer. Upon completion of the
` grading , the Civil Engineer and the Soil
Engineer shall certify that the. grading
has been completed in accordance with th "
plans , the soils report and the grading
ordinance . Reproducible copies of the
•plans on standard size sheets shall be
furnished to the Public Works Department ;
•13. That the connecting street, southeasterly
of Lot "B" be' 52 ' in width between exter or '
curbs in order to provide for a 20 ' ente i
ing roadway , an 8' median and a 24' exi t
ing roadway . 4
14. That all driveways be a minimum of 20 ' i '
length from the property line to ensure '
-no parking will b'e• in the public right-o -.way.' , i
' :15'. The portion of Lot "E" not included, in t e
public right-of-way , resulting from .the
closing of Bayside Drive ,- be dedicated t
the City , . 'an,d the existing right,of-way"
of Bayside Drive west of the proposed
waterway be retained under ,public contro
16. .A length ;of tangent be provided between he i
' two reversing curves at- the east end of he
development, adjacent to the existing Bay ide
Shopping Center. i
17. Parkway •trees be installed on all public f
rights-of-way in ac.cordance" with Parks,,
Beaches and Recreation Department specif -
cations . '
1,8. -Appropriate ' landscaping be installed- on
all slopes and, vacant space's .resul•ting
:•.from this developmen•t.. .
Page 4'.
' OTY OF NEWPORT REAM COMMISSIONERS
March 5 , 1970
i
:: . 19 :. A setback plan allowing for a variation
of front and rear setback lines be submi -
ted to the Planning Director for approva .
20 . , That there be no City financial obligati ns
connected with construction of realigned
Bay,side Drive .
21 . - That realigned Bayside Drive be construe ed
to its full width in connection with the
'developmentof .Tract 3867. Motion x
Second '. x
Aye xxxxx x
Nay x
Items 2 , 3 „ & 5 .
P986
Requests to permi-•t three : dwelling units ron- lots
having 3540 sq . ft. where the . districting •regu- f
lations require 3600 sq . ft. and to allow on
e\�c� h lot one open parking space eight feet wide , .
whe\r•`e the regulations require a covered space
nine eet wide .
Location Lots 26 , •28, 30 and 32 , Block 239 ,
Corona del Mar Tract , located at
24, 326 , 328 and •330• Marguerite
Alvknue on the easterly side of /
Marguerite Avenue between •Seaviei .
Avenueand East Coast Highway .
Zone : R-.3 `
App.l i cant: John D. Mi tch`�i I , Jr. Newport Bea h',
Owner: Same as applican� :1�<
This application was presented by'P,lanning • Dire for
Wilson , and new drawings (received fr'o.m the ap-
plicant were dfstribute,d" to the Commissioners . ;
Mr. John D. Mitchell.,,`Jr: , applicant , an'd, his,
attorney , Mr. George` Roberts , were present-..,,'
Mr. Roberts expla�i:f:ed the changes in the news"
plans and requested deletion of the portion of�,, I
the former application concerning parking . The
parking situation will be covered in a cross- .
easement ajreemen•t which would not require Plan j
ning Commission - action . -,
Motion was. made to approve a request to permit Motion' x y
three dwelling units on lots having 3540 s,q :ft. Second x
fiere the districting regulations rbqui re ' Aye x x x x x x
3600 sq . ft.• :. Nay x ,
Page 5 .
February 9, 1970
TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FROM: Public Works Department
SUBJECT: MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 25, REAL'IGNMENT OF BAYSIDE DRIVE IN
PROMONTORY POINT AREA
RECOMMENDATION:
4
That the amendment be approved.
DISCUSSION:
Because of the multiple issues involved in discussion of the proposed
Promontory Bay development at the February 5 Planning Commission
meeting, this memo is specifically addressed to the proposed amendment
to the Master Plan of Streets and Highways.
It is felt that the amendment can properly be considered by the City
separately from the other issues involved in the development because
approval of the amendment would not commit the city to approval of
any of the other matters at issue. In particular, existing Bayside
Drive could intersect with realigned Bayside Drive at the easterly
end of the realignment, and a frontage road could be provided or
omitted, as desired, southerly of the realigned portion.
Approval of the amendment is recommended for the following reasons :
1. The new alignment would be more direct than the existing
alignment.
2. An existing sharp curve would be eliminated.
3. Direct access to the arterial street would be eliminated
from approximately 12 homes having garages so located as
to require backing onto the street.
4. An existing poor intersection connecting Harbor Island Road
to the arterial street would be greatly improved.
5. The easterly entrance to Beacon Bay could be opened and
made usable,
Benjamin B. Nolan
Assistant Public Works Director
BBN/bg
February 9, 1970 i
, I
TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FROM: Public Works Department
SUBJECT: MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. '25, REALIGNMENT OF BAYSIDE DRIVE IN
PROMONTORY POINT AREA
RECOMMENDATION:.
That the amendment be approved.
i
DISCUSSION:
Because of the multiple issues involved in discussion of the proposed
Promontory Bay development at the February 5 Planning Commission
meeting, this memo is specifically -addressed to the proposed amendment
to the Master Plan of Streets, and Highways.
It is felt that the amendment can properly be considered by the City'
separately from the other issues involved in the development because
approval of the amendment would not commit the city to approval of
any of the other matters at issue. In particular, existing Bayside.
Drive could intersect with realigned Bayside Drive at the easterly
end of the realignment, and a frontage road could be provided or
omitted, as desired, southerly of the realigned portion.
Approval of the amendment is recommended for the following reasons : ,
1 . The new alignment would be more direct than the existing
alignment.
2. Art existing sharp curve would be eliminated.
3. Direct access to the arterial street would be eliminated
from approximately 12 homes having garages so located as
to require backing onto the street.
4. An existing poor intersection connecting Harbor Island Road i
to the arterial street would be greatly improved.
5. The easterly entrance to Beacon Bay could be opened and
made usable,
Benjamin B. Nolan
Assistant Public Works Director
BBN/bg
January 30, 1970
TO: •Planning Director
FROM: Harbor & Tidelands Administrator
SUBJECT: PROMONTORY BAT--
On. 30 January, I 'met with -Dave Kaylor and 'Jack Raub
to. discuss -processing of a Harbor Permit for Promontory Bay. '
We arrived at the following conclusions':
a. Jack Raub will immediately apply for a Corps of
Engineers' navigation permit .in accordance with the enclosed
letter from the Corps.
b. Jack Raub will, for The Irvine Company, 'immediately
apply for' a-City• Harbor Permit for the dredging operation. . In .
a subsequent .discussion with Rod 'Gunn, I agreed to set this up
for Council_•consideration •on '9 March •along with your end of the
project.
c. We will apply for-Joint Harbor Committee approval
on 10 February, This will start the ball rolling in the County
area.
{ There will have to be a considerable amount of conditioning
of approvals and permits. until we get more advanced and further
details are resolved. I am, hopeful of having the Corps of Engineers'
permit prior to 'go to Council, for the Corps will make the necessary ,
water quality and 'hydraulics studies, desired by both the Harbor
District and I. The Corps' permit also automatically takes care
of other agencies .such as the Department of Interior,, State Fish
and Game and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. .' '
One other area now xequires .attention. The Council will
want comments 'relative to .the, desirability: of dedicating privately
created waterways,,-- Dave.;Kaytor• will round up, The -Irviiie Company's
position. • T• will 'endeavor. to coordinate a• .Sta:ff position.
s
• ♦ ., G. M:,',DAWES .�N,iX � ��`L(./ •
Attachment ( V'E D i\
:TT, ,
CC:.• City. Manager. ;` •� f.},;.',�,J;h"'
Public• .Works Director y # a.f . e l�ltj _2
' Marine Safety'"Director' ;-.'• c. r c r
l
opt PW
• DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY*
fk'�U`� I•'/.'3; LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OR ENGINEERS
P. O. BOX 2711
1 LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA SOOSS
IN REPLY REFIR TO
SPLED-E 22 January 1970
r' Mr. George M. Dawes f"'., r:•i
t , l Harbor & Tidelands Administrator
City of Newport Beach
i 3300 Newport Boulevard.
Newport Beach, California, 92660
Dear Mr. Dawes:
A copy of the proposal to alter a portion of lower Newport Harbor,
as outlined in your submission to Mr. Herron of this office,' has
been reviewed by the Coastal Engineering and Operations Branch.
Mr. Herron discussed.our preliminary findings with you in a ; !: '• ' .
telephone conversation on 15 January 1970.
!'=' • A detailed review will be given this proposal when your formal
request for a navigation permit"is made. Our initial reaction is
as follows:
a. Tidal exchange of waters in the newly created bay should ,
be studied tb determine possible pollution effects.
b. The effect of ebb tide currents from the proposed new
entrance should be studied to avoid any adverse erosion and/or
',. '• shoaling effects on the banks of the existing channel.
c. It does not appear desirable to extend harbor lines into
the proposed basin.
d. A navigation permit will be required to connect the pro-
posed basin and entrance -channel to the existing navigation channel.'
V.
At least 30 days should be allowed to process this permit request.
;,;, , ' 'F',. ':-'•.' If you desire further information on the proposal, please do not
hesitate to call on us.
Sincerely ours,.
S J
CE
't
•
District
Engineer utY `
' ..,`. a .. , •,'
l,1.;, 1,`,t,' ,,, Ir .. .11.1,,1 nPl 11 , r i.,. ,��,•.,,, ,!,.,
' .1{',r. •r :,' r}.v:, };n"'Ij i:,'1',4',� ' '' Jl'.�,I +•r,l!",
- •. s. .d'�� `•::�" .5r 4'i ' '15��`1;4ii1,: i}' �.,` ,.• , } td�•,4 ,'*('1,4' � ,:. I .
t S '� • .r. +' . 1 i•' ''�I '}if�.'`•1'.l .�l�rl4 i+' 1"�•,�,'�;f j�il�" +,i:'.1''� 1'I +1 ' ,: ,1,'„•j!,`
i
,
„
d .. „ • , ,,. .- r . .., .... .�Jti:v A' w\I 471, n,\IS\ . ..J �d+! '1 .1
CITY OF NNV1101U' BT;ACII
PARKS BrAGIGS & RUC= ION CO.NMISSION •
J'anuary 9,`•l970'.', ,,;J .- r• ( r'
..........C. r,ry;l�•;r!'•: .I:• 'f ;u`,t'. '.r ,
' • .\- r t, \, ,r}':r.1'.1. .�•=.r.il':':h:rSi �%r C'' .Y,. r:<:' •�_: r•�I,.
. 'VP:. t;p,.t�S`.;;,. :,tis. •t':"r;.2'?.•J• r4'.I Fig
' i' +•5 fly ... ,. •,trt. .'.E'yi' ;i"•.:. ,i Yi••
T0: PLkNNING CONNISSION '•;= . ;, i ,,;J,ri ',: .:.Y,•}J .,,, :,',• ;
-ROM: ' PB & R Comnis§ion .. ;;, t. , r• ', s
SUBJECT: . USE iiFIMIT #1466 (PROMONTORY POINT)
Irvine Company plans ;for the development of Promontory 'Poin"t:and i
the contiguous land area adjacent to Bayside Drive through Use Permit lf1466r '"'''
?''
were reviewed at the PB & R Commission meeting of January:6th. '' "''�. '
PB $ R Commission considers this area to be one'of•'the most signifi-'.';,.
cant in Newport Beach as fax as land use; windows"-to the Bay and public access '
axe concerned. ` It is with this thoug'nt in mind that this -Commission hopes that
`•.i;,the Planning Commission,will not act too hastily in approval of development plans;. `rY,
After review, - the PB 4'R Commission approved in concept' of the land , ;'::•;: r ' :,f
;- use an4 felt that the,.development as projected would be ah asset to the 'cormun-
ity. However; 'once again additional people are being brought into the ,City,
"• through a residential development, with:no public park.or'recreational'`£acili".
ties being provided:
Since this is such a strategic location; the PB' & 'R Commission
instructed its Liaison Committee with the Planning Commission to meet 'in the.:'t• :?ti;,.; -:::';: •,'
'•:::'' immediate future to discuss this development. . -It would be desirable if such:;;;.`„-,;,'';. \:::'• i
a meeting were to take place'pxior' to Planning'CommissionIs •action•on .the :5 ;s;: '; ti';• ;
`• Irvine C?mpany proposals. *.., ,. ' ,' '
•: ' Items that should be considered in'this ''liaison meeting would be ; •,:''ti'='I'r• •' ,
park'sites and use, public,recreational^areas,:,vist'a,points 'and,access•,to t`he•a'::`; ""'l';,._':•
"Bay.• 1;;(' ,, Lr ; •;.'n:.:):.ir •,Y.'• :;, ,•.• :'+; it,. "- <'f;,'"=+;,... "1:
.•rt1 'd• •''• ..;. ,;.\ 54...." ..,fig •.1:• . 1.� •
.:t• ♦ r, r r ., ^.✓..I+i.' - :: }-Y.,1:-i:,,S,: ,' :,t' �J~' Je'ti' ;y.l';i, '
,' -5 • Your 'c6nsid&rations`.io :the•.PB' &,R:ComnUs•ion•:concenis idilh
• '�murh�'a reciated:•' t:`• -�: �`=�" = "
P . {:. •' .S: ;.;};. . +1. .,I:.'•n�2 •;\:- y,•r'�: .•,�1� ,:Ff: t:;(�c4a-'C•: i:�r:;:Y;. a;s�.
;"l, \. ?:''�' �'t'I`}:�6ir.• ..•,•.!t:'r J:I•,. J1:: .'1'v'I,...
r. 'r!'. nJ i.�r., .1`.' /J'!t. .,>"',•1'.''f'I: ,�,, ,:rr .(", ''V:
r,4µr •yrl•r. '1:. ..i' •lf• ♦ll:. :rf i. •'S�=: :l:i •iiri :rJ.
'•` 1. iP- •i}' �1(,: ,.l;f:,kii' rd:L 'rr.y',;J•::,n4'.;:
• � ri1. r' .r.
'tY :::\,:v: �.yam,'•
}: :' .$:': �1� ;', �1(frl�{�'.Gc•r•<'.aY"1`: .t. •i '� i' - ,(j'!•/�..+'.;�'•t.,.,�::•+;•, . .4�' . :'=I� 'S::: ..
Q,i' :; ; l;r�: Is`•.'' ' " r :, '.; ".A:C. -WEROV,:.JR. Chair;aan -
,'Q'%`f•o .:,;` " ; : ii r. =;.Parks., Beaches'A;Recieation,Commission:
•.\:%i Fi :hr,4J tr•'r V.: \r .�;.: 'r.,,-0(n.'j.:•:� •ti j
/�
r.Y••n M1 t
f.
r%: :�•. ••�Y: t•1 r r'L::. jr.,,, r •'l' rS r ,. 11{
':i+ •;t,; •',5;; I'}: :,'r: '.S :�I'•;<:',;1,•r n;.i„'•:.t,:.'4: ':'¢ :ni'p:•:'{,.t.:N•f:',>.,;t:. t.
•i•. •ACC:CCS':h:.,•.. ,;;*...•:"f' (:,t C�'� 'i�.t �i•:•'a;•:. :`r . ,,., , .t.
�.••:• ;fir, •� �.r4•t�;•''• • i, •;t;" ,rt:,, • ' :�i+'r•• .,.\r, . r ,
'+: ".i•=:,.'i::':i-�,.', '.. ✓'t J'•, pr.,.(, .Jl,'r`+giJ r: i.l� :: a:l;:. ';ir;:ti y.:
{:r:•. is{� ::J: fr•; ' sr•: ;•„tr.:: :rCtL'„2�',,,d: F.=.5 .v•:''�•i°s"'3U ''+,, i
• '.r• ':+i 9:,::'• ;:+::'„u••,i`''i.=:AM1 n:il,` , :y ,.S.i :•tlyy .;t.. •P:r
•t. •r... t,: :'.ia y,,. .I . :,��.; :t^ ::,ti, t.,4�. yrr .r",:1:'�lrF.n•r e^ .,Jr';'+:r1'..�Bi:. .�'=;.,:p�:i+?:,,= j�'w •) '
'r't'i lei.l=}i•y. rt', - t• •ii• ' .k. :nl r ,.Ij:•
rrr •,' 1•I.I:t•. 'rtJ•^ •1• ilp 'rr•( :n'v 4 \:t:'!�; �.iM1.:'r��,. YS:f:Ji a✓ •t• lam•
, : .., :pr`t,•5.J•.}(.l. Tj •�+:+ r ..I,,,ty:i�:: .,Y..r.rn rt:i'r4 , . ,•�`:':::i t�1!':Irr,:':: .i,
.�i. ':{}„•...1(4 iR'L: rj• r'a;1l,i", 'q• :a4%.' ;?'i,•b,?(:•Ir :n3,.r.^.,,r,q'. :r. r:•,
1. ;::' '1'' i:' ,i.A' :�: b6y :r .d f'-; u.. ,r•.M1,J.rtr. :•:•::'v
r lr. ' •;i.`,l�:r '.y.i:. �r(,: :��L :Cf"'k'::ft�'•:F:.,.' •:7f•"ti; �'.;•::.:bC.
' .. .. •v`. t:��'�.v'.:.Ir '- '4'Jt ,i•}h'S .6d"III
1 . =.ii: '•,14:;'i,rP Jt 'dy>: :Vii (I :.� i1't. :'i. ,,5,• :nIC,
PROMONTORY POINT MEETING -, Planning Director' s Office = 1/7/70
People in Attendance
Wade Beyeler. ,,,,, General Services Department o
Jan Briscoe Fire -Department
Mike Stang Planning Department
r
Dave Kaylor The Irvine Company
Ben Nolan ' Public Works Department
Bob Jaffe Public Works Departmen•t ;• ,
Chuck Thompson The Irvine Company,
Jack G. Raub' Raub , Bein & Frost
Rod Gunn Planning Department'
Bill Foley Planning Department
Bob Bein Raub , Bein , Frost & 'Associates
Jim Taylor "'•` The " Irvine Company
Dick Dusterhoff ;.• , Parks , Beache's & 'Recreation'
Larry Wilson Planning Department:,
Oliver Grant Bui'ldi,n'g Department ,,,
George' 'Dawes Harbor & 'T'ideliands
PROMONTORY POINT MEETING 1 -5-7.0
(* Items to'-be discussed at, meeting on 1 -12-70)
Approval of use permit with condition that an •amendment to
the Master Street and Highway Plan is approved.
Approval of use permit subject to conditions' that, may be
imposed by the Corps of Engineers , Regional Water Quality
Board and the Harbor Distri'ct,
(George Dawes wanted Irvine Company, to submi-t their
calculations on water quality torthese groups . 'Irvine
Company opposed contacting these. g.roups feeling that it
would hold up the project. George Dawes and Dave Kaylor ' .
of Irvine- Company are rto discuss this further. )
Public hearing' for revision of Master • Srtreet and Highway Plan
first Commission meeting in February. r ,;•r
Irvine Company torfile Master Plan of Joint Pier Facilities . .
* The Staff suggested that Irvine Company construct la.rger. .cul-
` de-sac at end of •existing ;Bayside -Drive. T.h,is would be for_
larger vehicles such as fire trucks , This possibly would,
}
mean losing, Lot #1 . , It -was also suggested that a "window;, '
to the bay" be provided at this point with provisions for.,
park benches , etc.
li
* The Staff is to study the • effect on the Balboa Marina
(land owned 'by City) by cutting off Bayside Drive.
The 'Staff felt that the h77 setback on. old Bayside •Drive,.
could be varied down to 10 ' .
The Staff felt that the relocation- of Bayside Drive would
benefit the Harbor, Isl.and and Beacon Bay residents and
would permit the use of the rear• gate at Beacon- Bay.,
* The Staff suggested that more study be• given to the Harbor,
Drive - old Bayside Drive 'inter"s'ection by the Irvine Company.
However, it was felt the Irvine Company, is not responsible,
for this intersection . "
* The Staff felt that the proposed .new, intersection between;
Bayside Drive and Harbor results in a better condi•tion.• : >'
However, they §ugges•ted that the, entrance. on Ha'rbor.,Drfv.e_ be,
a divided, street with 24'' on •'each side of a :6 ' - med4a.n,' '' "
3 -
* The Irvine Company to study the effpct of realignment of ,
the upper portion of Bayside Drive due to the ,Coast Freeway
will have on the proposed new• Bayside• Drive.
The Staff •expressed. concern about the possible access to •
Parcel #8 and suggested that if it is to be taken from li
Bayside Drive it be opposite Harbor Drive entrance.
* The Staff expressed approval of proposed cross section for '
new Bayside Drive (attached') . However, they suggested-
further studies by Irvine Company on the possibilities of:." -
a frontage road for the lots fronting on Baysi'de Drive.,`'
It was suggested maybe• this could be accomplished by
moving Bayside Drive up the slope. '' . , '
The Staff expressed approval of the view to the lagoon
along the 1500 ' marina and the pedestrian way to be
provided along this area. It •was also' understood there would
be park bench facilities in this area.
The Staff strongly urged the Irvine Company 'to provide .veh1,cu-
lar access from new Baysi.de to the upper bluff• development .
and• an overhead pedestrian crossing to the pedestrian wa,y,,"
along the marina. .It •was felt• thts is warranted, by the
approximate• 1,000 dwel 1 i`ng uni t5, to' be bui.l t in- the upper;';
0uff area.. ..
- 4 -
The Irvine Company said they were taking into considerat5;on
the window-to-the-bay concepts for the upper development. ',
* The Irvine Company is •to make further study of the effe•ct••the
relocation' of Bayside 'Drive' has on the shopping center, ' • .
parking lot.
* The Irvine Company is• going to provide "blow=up" drawings •on
the effect the relocation of Bayside Drive has on the
apartment development' s access . •They also are going to '
provide information on how Parce'1s #3 'and #4 wil'i• get acc'e'ss•.'
The Irvine Company is to contact '.utility companies to .see•'
if any problems exist.
The City is to check out possibility of undergrou'nding
utilities on old Bayside Drive.' ,
* The Irvine• Company is t6',provid6 information on .storm drains '
dumping into lagoon.,,, ' '
January 7•, 1970
RLGjkk
��,� +- 1 � � } � t .{_ t. i .+ � • .t � i ,,- i r�� i � -i -r - i ' i 1 � � f -i- i i- } _ — - '
' ' • i-- � = i � 1 . _ ���, _ Pl�� t IAa�c���a,q�T��-, -�Ya�_. 1 ky. _ �_ � -
' - : 1 1 i to 4 � - � � ' � Lp•f.� '�`rJa`�• �� y � ^_ � 1 �- -
1 , ,
•- - -•-�-;--• -k r-'---•---�--,—�- ---,--=- � : `�_ - ,S-c� .-.,ram;_'' v "_--"- -
_�_.-._... .�__- .' ____- _. _'- `_-•----`^_'___�__. -....__-.__....____.�_-.__. __._��-.�t1 i--.__. ____'-____..may, + ,,,.¢�_'.. • ._�. '. �__ _ -
-
- CollinsO 's
J
say
r
r� Coron
T a del Marl Y Gt
c 0
rona
del MaA
Arch Rack ,
x���� •:n 1 l..-
-
Hafbdr
>. Bay i Call I s — ____ '. ` j� f<• ��
r
lboa
Y� I
BN'S
8 Coron f x
del Mar
' \`�-\ 'A^'.1 '•�n tea'
• - .n `;yew♦�
� WulMt
Corona
—,� do]'M
f
(ON ios.•
M�STEQ PWA mwD. No. 25
Arch Rock
t F4Sr
m �b9Sr
9N Cl H �9
�'/, Fla .;Jai^:'n°;},n"�i•�,•.i.aK„N caasr srgr
lik �A�^ (7 �k➢wJr:.` -s E HWY
4 ' 4lNN/f
b
a A' CNM 9 rc
Q �' IBAYS/OE
1
C•I•H �`� R3 =�c=-N
BALBOA
i YACHT
��� ' 1-�• -��P/6FN6A�lF�
r- _- 370
i B_ALBOA_ISLAND CHAZ�'BL =.,,,_, <
25.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 25
Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of
the City of Newport Beach will hold a public hearing on
Master Plan Amendment No . 25 which proposes to realign
Bayside Drive between East Coast Highway and Jamboree
Road (Marine Avenue) and also to abandon a section of the
existing Bayside Drive westerly of Jamboree Road . (Marine
Ave nu-e) .
Notice is hereby further given that said public hearing
will be held on the 5th day of February 1970 at the hour
of 8: 00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Newport Beach
City Hall , at which time and place any and all persons
interested may appear and be heard thereon .
Don R. Adkinson , Secretary
Newport Beach City
Planning Commission
Publ i cation Date
Date REceived • h„
/QG-.e—r�
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
NEWPORT HARBOR ENSIGN
STATE OF CALIFORNIA l ss.
County of Orange j
I, .........ARVO...Bt...IiMM..................... being first
duly sworn, and on oath depose and say that I am the
printer and publisher of the Newport Harbor Ensign, a
weekly newspaper printed and published in the City of
Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of California,
and that the.NOTIQ) Ok••_R7AU HEARING
..........................................................................................................
..........................................................................................of which
copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was
printed and published in the regular issue(s) of said
newspaper, and not in a supplement, .......1.......... consecu-
tive times: to-wit the issue(s) of
.......................Jant....22...._1970....................
......................................................................................
..................................................................................... NO o flt7@ ..
LEGAL N
- a. �_
r1tCi HEAI21NG
...................................................................................... MASTER PLAeS)YIENDMENT
TICE OF
City of Newport, e
Notice is h i given tha�the,
11 jam!
Cocci sion of the '
(Signed)........... ...............�.:...1.. .............. . �eaoh will hold .
23rd a public hearing onMaster Plan
Subscribed and sworn to before me this.......T.....day of Amendment No,15 Which pro-
January lg„70 poses to realign Bayside Drive
.,,,•
between East Coast Highway
and Jamboree R' d (Marine)
�, �� Avenue) and a abandon a
- Section of the kde
otar ublic in and forte • - Drive wester ee
County of Orange, State of California, Road(Marilte,AVye"MY COMMISSION EXPIPXO Ic- 1? 1 Q-I Netiee is el: y,. @n
that said p bli, A'held on the 5th, oy,
1970, at the hour of 801p.m,
in the Council Chambers of,
[' the' Newport Beach City Hall,{
r at which time and place 81iy,
and all persons Wterested may
appear and be heard thereap.
* = Don R. Adkitcson,rSecretary
Newport Beach Citk
Planning Commission
Publish:Jan. $2, 1070, in
the Newport Harbor Ensign_;
i
Public :Works Department
w
Planning Department
Preliminary Bayside Drive Maste-r Plan
"yM
I have reviewed the Preliminary Bayside Drive i1a.ster Plan
" '- transmitted by your memorandum of February 5, 1971 % but have
not actually cha,cked the plan in the fiend. The following
questions are noted, I will try to took at these on the
ground within the next day or two, in the event that further
discussion may be warranted.
I . What is the destination of the sidewalk shown
extending northerly along tha wast side of
Carnation Avenue, and what sidewalk provisions
(if any) are, necessary -along this .treat?
2. Is a sidewalk contiovous with the northerly curb
of Bayside Drive the best design solution or
should consideration, be given to a vertebra
(perhaps more natur,ali,i:ic) sidewalk treatment?
3. What is the .affect of the proposed v+idening
of Bayside Orive and tiarguorite Avenue?
A. Removal or transplanting of existing
mature palm trees.
B. Possibility fb r border landsca:p1-ng of
parking areas.
C. - ,, 'Prohibition bf. on-street parking.
D. Detail of AntersotO on channalization.
February 10 1971
NXTURE Laurence WilsonD TE LW/kk
Planning Director
CC : City Manager
P B H
General Services
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Office of
CITY ATTORNEY
tit
To: The Honorable Mayor and Date: July 13, 1970
Members of the City Council
From: City Attorney
Subject: Agreement providing for indemnification of the
City by The Irvine Company in connection with
the abandonment of a portion of Bayside Drive
Transmitted herewith is an agreement for approval by the City
Council providing for indemnification of the City by The Irvine
Company for damages in inverse condemnation which may be
asserted by the owner's lessees or tenants of the Balboa Yacht
Basin property arising out of the abandonment of a portion of
Bayside Drive. The agreement has been executed by The Irvine
Company.
The essential terms of the agreement provide:
1, That The Irvine Company will reimburse the City up to a
maximum sum of $50,000 for damages which the City may incur
as a result of claims in inverse condemnation asserted by
the lessees, sublessees or tenants of the Balboa Yacht Basin
property, based upon the abandonment of a portion of Bayside
Drive and the creation of a cul-de-sac easterly of the Balboa
Yacht Basin property.
2. The Irvine Company agrees to reimburse the City for
attorneys ' fees and court costs incurred in defending against
any lawsuit brought by said lessees, sublessees or tenants
against the City, up to a maximum amount of $5,000.
3. The agreement provides that if the City finds it necessary
to employ an appraiser to assist in defending against any
such claims, Irvine will share equally in paying the appraisal
fee.
4. The City reserves the right to compromise or settle any such
claim without the consent of The Irvine Company, in which
event Irvine is obligated to contribute up to $50,000 to
such settlement.
Y '
To: Mayor and City Council -2- July 13, 1970
This agreement satisfies the requirements expressed by the
City Council as a condition of the action abandoning a
portion of Bayside Drive, and is recommended for approval.
� LSTULL4
City Attorney
THS:mh
Att.
cc: City Manager
City Clerk
Y N
INDEMNITY AGREEIJENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made by and between the CITY OF NEWPORT
BEACH, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City, "
and THE IRVINE COMPANY, a West Virginia corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "Irvine":
RECITALS
On the 23rd day of March, 1970, the City Council of the
City of Newport Beach adopted Resolution No. 7163 declaring its
intention to order the closing up, vacation and abandonment of
a portion of a certain street known as Bayside Drive. All of
that portion of said street to be vacated, closed up and abandoned
is more clearly shown on a certain map approved and adopted by
the City Council by Resolution No. 7162 dated March 23, 1970,
which said map is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of . the
City of Newport Beach. Said abandonment proceedings were commenced
by the City at the request of Irvine.
On January 9, 1950, the City of Newport Beach entered
into a lease of City-owned real property with J. A. Beek,
Carroll B. Beek, Barton Beek and Joseph L. Beek, Jr. , which
included the following described real property consisting of
approximately 7 acres, which is hereinafter referred to as the
Balboa Yacht Basin property:
cc A parcel of land +situated in the Northwest quarter of
Section 35, Township 6 South, Range 10 West, SBB6M2 Orange
G� County, California, more particularly described as follows,
to wit:
Gnu`• Beginning at a point in the U. S. Bulkhead line between
Station No. 200 and Station No. 101, as shown upon a map
entitled "Harbor Lines , Newport Bay Harbor, California",,
approved May 2nd, 1936, by the Secretary of Way, and on
t+ p• file in the office of the U. S. District Engineer at Los
Angeles, California, said point of beginning being East
784.25 feet of said Bulkhead Station No. 200; running
thence North 424.71 feet to a point in the Northerly line
of that certain parcel of land conveyed to the City of
Newport Beach by The Irvine Company, as described in deed
recorded September 25th, 1929, in Book 306, page 375 of
Official Records of Orange County, California; thence
South 35043' East 772.15 feet to the Northeasterly corner
of the last mentioned parcel of land; thence South along
the Easterly line of the last mentioned parcel of land
367.01 feet to a point in said U. S. Bulkhead line between
Station No. 200 and Station No. 101; thence West along
said Bulkhead line 770 feet to the point of beginning;
containing approximately seven (7) acres.
There is a possibility that if Bayside Drive is
abandoned as proposed, the lessees under the above described
lease, and their sublessees, may have claims for damages against
the City based upon inverse condemnation. The City Council has
taken the position that before it will proceed with any further
consideration of the proposed abandonment of Bayside Drive, it
will require that the Irvine Company enter into an agreement
indemnifying the City against any claims based upon inverse
condemnation which may be asserted against the City by the City's
tenants under the above described lease, or their sublessees or
tenants, which claims are alleged to have arisen as a result of
the abandonment and -relocation of Bayside Drive and the creation. .
of a cul-de-sac southeasterly of the Balboa Yacht Basin property.
Irvine is willing to agree to indemnify the City for such claims ,
subject to the following terms and conditions :
WITNESSET114:
1. LIABILITIES, LOSSES OR DAMAGES
Irvine undertakes to indemnify and save harmless
the City from any liability or damages City may suffer as the
result of claims, demands, 'or judgments against it arising out,
of the abandonment and relocation of Bayside Drive and the
creation of a cul-de-sac located southeasterly of the Balboa
Yacht Basin property based upon any claim for inverse condemnation
by any lessee, sublessee or tenant of the Balboa Yacht Basin
property. Said indemnity shall include a maximum limitation
-2-
of $50,000 for damages to the leasehold interest or interests .
2. ATTORNEYS` FEES AND COSTS
In addition to the indemnity provided in Paragraph 1*
of this Agreement, Irvine will reimburse City for attorneys ' fees
and court costs actually incurred in defending against any
lawsuit brought by said Lessees, sublessees or tenants against
the City, up to a maximum amount of $5,000. Reimbursement for
legal services shall be based on the applicable provisions of
the latest adopted minimum fee schedule of the Orange County
Bar Association.
3. EMPLOYMENT OF APPRAISER
Should it become necessary in the judgment of the
City to employ an expert appraiser for the purpose of arriving
at a settlement or to defend against any claim arising within
the scope- of Paragraph 1 of this Agreement, it is agreed that
the City and Irvine will share equally in paying the fee of
said appraiser and that said amount shall not be included within
the limitations on the amount of reimbursement to which City is
entitled, set forth in Paragraph 1 hereof.
4. SETTLEMENT
City shall have absolute discretion to compromise
or settle any claim or litigation which comes within the scope
of "%this Indemnity Agreement, without the consent or approval of
Irvine, in which event Irvine will be obligated to indemnify
City, subject to the limitations of this Agreement.
5. NOTICE OF CF ADI
City agrees to give Irvine written notice of any
claim or demand subject to indemnity under this Agreement,
within thirty (30) days after said claim or demand is presented
to City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused
-3-
I r
this Agreement to be executed on the date set forth opposite
their respective signatures.
CITY OF NET,4PORT BEACH, a municipal
corporation
By:
Mayor
Dated: ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM: City C er CITY
City 1 Uorneyy
THE IRVINE COMPANY, a West Virginia
corporation
itle• VICE ri3E8toENT, .
I f
Dated: AL 7 1970 By: ',<;/ /ch,.%(
Title: ASSISTANT T SFCt'M,,V
IRVINE
'I'HS:mh
_4_ 6/5/70
TO:
F-1 MAYOR Q LIBRARY
COUNCIL PARK
MANAGER 0 MARINE SAFETY
F--JATTORNEY E:] PARKS & REC.
M BUILDING F-1 PERSONNEL
CITY CLERK n-P�LANNING
FINANCE F-1 POLICE
FIRE Q PUBLIC WORKS
0 GEN. SERVICES PURCHASING
O HARBOR & Q TRAFFIC
TIDELANDS
FOR.-F-1 ACTION & DISPOSITION
F-1 FILE-
[&tg'FORMATI
F—J REVIEW & . M El$lc
F-1 RETURN
REMARKS ....................... ..........A
S*--------------. ...........
.................................. . i
Ntl'VPpR
............................................. 7' ....... . ...............
... ............................................................................................
..............................
.............
4
Q �Po T`
° .,. CITY OF NEWPOR T BEACH
CALIFORNIA s:uo
C't��FOR P J� City Hall
3300 Newport Blvd.
(714) 673-2110
August 13, 1970
The Irvine Company
550 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660 '
Attention: Mr. Maurice McDonald
Subject: Access to Promontory Point Development
Gentlemen:
Subsequent to our meeting of August 11 , 1970 regarding the
Promontory Point development I have reviewed the matter of access
to Bayside Drive with the Planning Director, the Public Works Director,
and the Traffic Engineer.
It is our opinion that the access points to Bayside Drive should
be limited to three in number; the main drive connections at the easterly
and westerly ends, and a connection near the center located opposite
the Promontory Bay Marina drive entry.
It is also requested that the intersections of the frontage
road with the Bayside Drive connections be separated from Bayside Drive
by as large a dimension as possible so as to improve operating
characteristics.
Very tr - yours,
Benjamin B. Nolan
City Engineer
BBN/em
CC: Mr. Dave Kaylor
Mr. Bob Bein
Planning Director c�
Fisher-Friedman Associates
Sasaki-Walker Associates
5
r ,
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY ATTORNEY
Department
TO: City Clerk DATE- April 239 1970
FROM- City Attorney
SUBJECT : (1) Assolutida ad ptistg AeesndwMt No. 23 to the taster
Street. and Rigghway plan
(2) ltesolutioa ordering the vacation„ closing up and
abandonment of a portion of a certain street knoene
as Saysde Drive
riavei t
Transwitted for presentation to the Council at the Moting of
April 27th are copies of the above r*solutions in coausceion
with the ?rosantory Say developmenti,
TMY xe SaldOtlMt
City Attorney
Ays
a
Assistant City Attorney
Dolulwh
Att.
act City manager -- _
vunnu Direcs:or�
public works Director
file
- 1
i
• r
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 25
TO THE MASTER STREET AND HIGHWAY PLAN
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and the City Council
have heretofore adopted a Master Plan which includes as a unit
thereof a Master Street and Highway Plan, with revisions; and
WHEREAS, studies by the Planning Commission reveal
that since the adoption of said Master Street and Highway Plan
there have been changes in conditions which indicate that said
Plan should be amended to show new alignments, additions, street
name corrections and classification changes; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Newport
Beach, after notice as required by law, has held a public hearing
on the proposed amendment and has recommended the adoption of
the amendment to the Master Street and Highway Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after notice as required by
law, has held a public hearing on said proposed amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is
desirable to amend said Master Street and Highway Plan as
recommended;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council
of the City of Newport Beach does hereby adopt Amendment No. 25
to the Master Street and Highway Plan as shown on a map entitled
Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof, designating
thereon that Bayside Drive between East Coast Highway and Jamboree
Road (Marine Avenue) should be realigned northerly of existing
Bayside Drive, and said "realignment be added to the City of
Newport Beach Master Street and Highway Plan.
ADOPTED this 27th day of April, 1970.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
THSemh
4/21/70
I ♦1
III � . li �7��',+ •'ly '' r '• 1,�d 1. ` I ,'iY �'�., •I ,
`(t, •'.?�f fivr'f1i rP,l{ari�,,n•yjl)( i,. ',;., ' � /
!r .d �.l" '• if y,,lr ��. r;i. 't.1 h.;i ,'t . . .
L
�J .r:. . -
raw
.r �.4j. t•!r';" r='''''r:`;:*a.•.ya�;:>...._. srarE N
�, "',uYS�o�' .,`��i1^�'"'�� t"4 •�•.�i�: a gyp. +'- u a.a ,
•,f J t a `nY 'C �• a
t. •,;$•''4, ;:f.� CNN, s rc
r', a :.T•,-r&1YS/DE+.�:r:.w...�...;, .•• .a.:y.0��• 1qq__ r',d da✓
_ 1 1 R.g
BAL BOA
I YACHT BAS/N
I 1 uiPta�wu�t��
:Y�y• . .. 370
I'i BALBOA XSLAND CHANiVLL
_
EXHIBIT "A"
.. a
w•! V
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH ORDERING THE VACATION, CLOSING UP
AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF A CERTAIN STREET
KNOWN AS BAYSIDE DRIVE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Newport
Beach did, on .the 23rd day of March,. 197.0, pass its certain
Resolution of Intention No . 7163, declaring its intention to
order the vacation, closing up and abandonment of a portion
of a certain street known as Bayside Drive, in the City of
Newport Beach, hereinafter more particularly described, pursuant
to and in accordance with the "Street Vacation Act of 1941, " and
all amendments thereto, being Sections 8300 to 8331, inclusive
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the Street Superintendent of the City of
Newport Beach has caused to be posted conspicuously along the
line of the portion of said street proposed to be vacated, not
more than 300 feet apart, and not less than three in all, notices
of the vacation of said portion of said street, all of which
will more fully appear from the affidavit of Joseph T. Devlin,
Street Superintendent of the City of Newport Beach stated the
passage of said Resolution of Intention No. 7163 aforesaid, and
the time and place of the hearing of all persons interested in
or objecting to the proposed vacation of said portion of said
street; and
WHEREAS, said notices so posted by the Street Super-
intendent of the City of Newport Beach stated the passage of
said Resolution of Intention No. 7163 aforesaid, and the time
and place of the hearing of all persons interested in or object-
ing to the proposed vacation of said portion of said street; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach
did set Monday, April 27, 1970, at 7 :30 p.m. of said day as the
� � Y
time, and the Council Chamber of the City Council of the City
of Newport Beach, as the place for the hearing of all persons
interested in or objecting to the proposed vacation of said
portion of said street; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution of Intention No. 7163
aforesaid has been published at least once in the Newport
Harbor Ensign, the official newspaper of the City, and said
publication was made more than 15 days prior to the date set
for the hearing of all persons interested in or objecting to
the proposed vacation, all of which will more fully appear by
the affidavit of Arvo E. Haapa, Printer and Publisher of the
Newport Harbor Ensign, on file in these proceedings; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Newport
Beach has heard the evidence, both written and verbal, of all
persons interested in the vacation of said portion of said
street in this resolution more particularly hereinafter des-
cribed, and finds from all the evidence submitted that said
portion of said street described in said Resolution of
Intention, and hereinafter described, is unnecessary for
present or prospective public street purposes;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of
Newport Beach finds and determines and hereby orders that
the following described portion of that certain street known
as Bayside Drive in the City of Newport Beach, to wit:
Those portions of Block 94 of Irvine's Subdivision
as shown on a map thereof, recorded in Book 1, page 88
of Miscellaneous Record Maps, records of Orange County,
California, described as follows :
Parcel 1
BEGINNING at an angle point in the Southerly right-
of-way line of Bayside Drive as conveyed to the County
of Orange by deed recorded in Book 830, page 217 of
Official Records, records of said Orange County, Calif-
ornia, said point being a 1 1/2" iron pipe and nail as
-2-
shown on a map of Tract No. 4003, recorded in Book 188,
pages 13 through 19, inclusive, of Miscellaneous Maps,
records of said Orange County, California; thence along
said Southerly right-of-way line of Bayside Drive,
South 84° 46 ' 33" East, 1242 .50 feet to the True Point
of Beginning of this description: thence continuing
South 840 46 ' 33" East along said Southerly right-of-
way line of Bayside Drive a distance of 716 .41 feet to
the beginning of a nontangent curve, concave Northeaster-
ly, having a radius of 892 .00 feet, a radial line from
said beginning bears North 5° 131 27" East; thence
Northwesterly along said curve, through a central angle
of 23° 58' 52" an arc distance of 373.35 feet to a point
in a line parallel with and 77 .00 feet Northerly of said
Southerly right-of-way line of Bayside Drive, a radial
line from said point bears North 290 12 ' 19" East; thence
North 840 46 ' 33" West along said parallel line a dis-
tance of 303.46 feet to the beginning of a nontangent
curve, concave Westerly, having a radius of 55.00 feet,
a radial line from said beginning bears South 710 36 '
48" West; thence Southerly and Westerly along said curve,
through a central angle of 113° 34'. 41 ' an are distance of
109:03 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this descrip-
tion.
Parcel 2
BEGINNING at an angle point in the Southerly right-
of-way line of Bayside Drive as conveyed to the County of
Orange by deed recorded in Book 830, page 217 of Official
Records, records of said Orange County, California, said.
point being a 1 1/2" iron pipe and nail as shown on a map
of Tract No. 4003, recorded in Book 188, pages 13 through
19, inclusive, of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said
Orange County, California; thence along said Southerly
right-of-way line of Bayside Drive, South 84' 46 ' 33" East,
1170.60 feet• thence leaving said Southerly right-of-way
line North 53 13' 27" East, 69 .30 feet to the True Point
of Beginning of this description, said point being in a
nontangent curve, concave Northwesterly, having a radius
of 100.00 feet, a radial line at said point bears North
190 41' 101" West, thence Northeasterly along said curve,
through a central angle of 80 59 ' 28", an are distance of
15.69 feet; thence nontangent to said curve North 84 46
331" West, 13.66 feet; thence South 50 13 ' 271" West, 7.70
feet to the True Point of Beginning.
is necessary for present or prospective public street purposes,
and that it be vacated, closed up and abandoned.
The City Council further finds and determines, and it is
hereby ordered, that the public easement in the portion of said
street as heretofore described has, upon the passage of this
resolution, ceased except that the City reserves and excepts
from said vacation the permanent easement and right, at any
time, or from time to time, to construct, maintain, operate,
-3-
replace, remove and renew sanitary sewers and storm drains
and appurtenant structures in, upon, over and across said
portion of said street so vacated and pursuant to any exist-
ing franchised or renewals thereof, or otherwise,- to con-
struct, maintain, operate, replace, remove, renew and en-
large lines of pipe, conduits, cables, wires, poles, and other
convenient structures, equipment and fixtures for the opera-
tion of gas pipe lines, cable television, telegraph-.
elegraph and tele-
phone lines and the distribution of electric energy, water,
and incidental purposes.
The City Council further orders that the City Clerk of
the City of Newport Beach shall cause a certified copy of this
Order, duly attested by her as the City Clerk, under the seal
of the City, to be recorded in the office of the County
Recorder -of the County of Orange, State of California, imme-
diately following the passage of this resolution.
ADOPTED this 27th day of April, 1970.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
THS:s
4-22-70
-4-
s
n
9�
F
I� O-
pd CIF�C
COAST
� Is
\\ O to,\\.
P\\. P po
E
YT
�O
1 Co F D. 1 112 1 P H N A I L N I N wo
: I
Qj PERTR.4003, M.M. 166/ 13-20 NI ,o�• �. p
Z
oa$
RR DETA I L "A"
E X N I IT 0p __ `�a SCALE
Q�b PER TR 4003, M.M. I&a I-S-TSB
SI, ETCN TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL
DESCRIPTION
FOR ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF 64YSIDE DQIVE
SEItdG A PC9MOM OF BLOCK 94 OF IRVIWflS SUBDWISIOW AS SNOWW ON
A MAP RECORDED IW 50014. 1, PAGE88 OF MVSCELLAtAEOUS MAPS, 7.ECO205
OF ORAAIGE COUWTY) CALIFORNIA
CITY OF MEWPORT BEACH
_ SURVEY 01VISIOPI
REFE¢E.NCE RIGHT OF WAY MAP
I
I
t RAUB BEIN FROST
AND A8AOCIATES REVISED
CIVIL E N G I N E E R SAND LAND S U R VE Y1)RS
1'36 POC,iESTER STREET
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA TEL [714? 546 71-13 SCALE 1"ZSC' DATE 1-9.70
PREP BY I PERMIT Wo
RAM, BEM, FROST & ASSOCIATES
136 Rochester Street
Costa Mesa, California
Revision #1 March 61 1970
March 3, 19TO
Promontory Bay
Page l of 1
D E S CATP T'101i
Abandonment of a Poacbidur:.pF Bayside Drive
r'
That portion of Block'.94 of Irvine's Subdivision as shpnnl on
a map thereof, recorded in Book i,• iAge 88 of Mtaeellaneovs Reoord'Maps, "
records of Orange County, Califpi4iM- described as follows: ;
BEGINNING at an sngle'pojAt in the Southerly right-ofw%fajy line
of Bayside Drive as conveyed, to the County of Orange by deed recorded in
Book 830, page 217 of Official Records, records of said Orange County,
California, said point being a 1, l/V' iron pipe. and nail as shove on a
map of Tract No. 4003, recorded in Book 188, pages 13 through 20. inclu-
sive, of Miscellaneous Maps, tenoide. of said Orange County, California;
thence along said Southerly right"of°vay line of Bayside Drive,
South 84046,33" East, 1288.61 f'ee4 to the True Point of aeginning of this
description; thence continuing Sptith,•.84046133" East along said Solatsherly
right-of-way line of Bayside- Drive,a,distanee of 670.31 feet to the
beginning of a nontangent curve; concave Northeasterly, having a radius
of 892.00 feet, a radial line from said beginning bears
North 5013'e7" Bast; thence Northwesterly along asid curve, tbxc* a
central angle of 23058152", en arb distance of 373.35 feet to a point
in a line parallel with and 77.00,!,toet Northerly of daid Southerly right-
of-way line of Bayside Drive, a radial line from said point bears
North• 29012'19" East; thence Borth 8,4046'33" West along said parallel
line a distance of 325.30 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve,
concave Westerly, having a radius of 55.00 feet, a radial line from said
beginning bears South 3603014V West; thence Southeasterly and Southerly
along said curve, through a central angle of W45155", an arc distance
of 88.09 Peet to the True Point of Beginning of this description.
CONTAINI14Gs 0.748 acres' more or less, gross.
SUBJECT TOo An Covenants, Rights, Rights-of-Ray and Easements
of Record.
EnniT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof.
VILUAM J. FR06TA a Surveyor
�� /7co �\
9�
tc
I
_ O-
/_/
y A�
\Q i
-P
�p��PAV O
qp
cl
N cn
PER TR.4003, M.M. 188/13-20 0. —ooc� P
NI
I 2 r� 9Q
J
�0'A tR� 51100
I
�y\pt- DE TA I L A„
EXN I I T I R� �p Sa SCALE 1": BOO;
' \ FD II/z" LP. W/NAIL
Qom/ PER TR 4003, M.M. 188/13•ZA
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL
DESCRIPTION
FOR ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF bAYS) DE DZVE
6E(N4. A PCRTION OF BLOCK 94 OF IRVINES SUBDIVISION AS SUOWNON
A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 88 OF W;CELLANEOUS MAPS, 2EC0RDS
OP ORANGE COUNTY, CAUF02NIA
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
_ SURVEY DIVISION
REFERENCE RIGUT OF WAY MAP
i
RAUB REIN FROST
AND ASSOCIATES REVISED
CIVIL _ENGINEERSAND =AND SURVE Y,)RS
136 Ptl[-FIESTEH STRFET I
r09TA MESA. CALIFURNIA ' FL (714) 54e 7729 SCALE I"r5C" DATE 3-9•7101
PREP BY CueO. 6Y PERMIT NO
RAUB, BEng, FROST & ;ASSOCIAT2S
136 Rochester gtreet
Costa Mesa, California
Revision #1 March 6, 1970
March 3, 1970
Promontory Bay
Page 1 of 1
DES C IP1T'j011
„ GI
Exhib3t tuL1't
Abandonment of a P�or9iio�s.':i,f. Bayside Drive .
That portion of BlodX.,� 1{';q8 Irvine's Subdivision as 'shown on
a may thereof, recorded in Book '','gage 88 of Miscellaneous. Regov,4 Maps,
records of Orange County, Caji't6ici%p described as follows:
BEGINNING at an anple`pci:it in the Southerly right-ofWo line
of Bayside Drive as conveyed to the,tCounty of Orange by deed recorded in t,
Book 8306 page 21T of Official R'egords, records of said Orange County,
California, said point being:a 1 1/2,' iron pipe and nail as shot+,• on a
map of Tract No. 4003, recorded in Book 188, pages 13 through 20, Inclu-
sive, of Miscellaneous Maps, recsxrda,of said Orange County, California;
thence along said Southerly, right»of-way line of Bayside Drive,
South 84046133" East, 1288.61 feett6 the True Point of Bsginning• of this
description; thence continuing spiitb,;84°46'33" East along said Southerly
right-of-vay line of Bayside Drkve.•a,diatanee of 670.31 feet to the �•:
beginning of a nontangent curve, concave Northeahterly, having• & radius
of 892.00 foot$ a radial line from said beginning bears
North 5°13127" East; thence Northwester3y along said curve, thrbush a
central angle of 23058152", an nzo distance of 373.35 feet to a point
in a line parallel with and 77.00.feet Northerly of said SouthA;ly,right-
of vsy line of Bayside Drive, A radial line from said point briars �
North 29012f19" East, thence North ,6,4°46'33" West along said parallel
fine a distance of 325.30 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve,
concave Westerly, having a radius of 55.00 .feet, a radial line'from said
beginning bears South 36*30148". Wes,#4 thence Southeasterly and Southerly
along said curve, through a central, angle of 91"45155", an are distance
of 88,09 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this descriptibn..
CONTAINING: 0.748 acres, more or less, gross.
SUBJECT TO: All Covenants, Rights, Rights-of—taay and Easements
of Record.
EXHIBIT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof.
WWILtW4 J. FROST,, ) nd Surveybr
12
k
RAUB, BEIN, FROST & ASSOCIATES
136 Rochester Street
: . . Costa Mesa, California r. 'i
Revision N2 March 20, 1970 .
, i Promontory Bay
Page 1 of 2 e
,., . .,;; ,f',i .~�•4r. .• •D'E 'S dC R I .P T I 0 ,N• '
,Exhibit "rAu • — • ' : gg
',:. •, .• Abandonment of a Portion of Bsyside' Drive t
Those portions of Block 94 of Irvine's Subdivision as shown on
a map thereof, recorded in Book 1, page 88 of Miscellaneous Record Maps,' ;
`.. records of Orange County, California, ,described as follows:
Parcel 1
BEGINNING at an angle point in the Southerly right-of-way line
of Bayside Drive as conveyed to the County of Orange by deed recorded in
Book 830, page 217 of Official Records, records of said Orange County,
California, said point being a 1 1/2" iron pipe and nail as shown o
map of Tract No. 4003, recorded in Book 188, pages 13 through( 20 'inclu- 9
sive, of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County, California; _
• ' ' thence along said Southerly right-of-way line of Bayside Drive,
South 84046'33" .East, 1242.50 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this
description; thence continuing South 84046133" East along said Southerly
right-of-way line of Bayside Drive a distance of 716.41 feet to the
beginning of a nontangent curve, concave Northeasterly, having a radius.
of 892.00 feet, a radial line from said beginning bears North 5013'27" East;
thence Northwesterly along said curve, through a central angle of
• 23058'52", an arc distance of 373.35 feet to a point in a line parallel
with and 77.00 feet Northerly of said Southerly right-of-way line of i
Bayside Drive, a radial line from said point bears North 29°12'19" East;
thence North 84046,33" West along said parallel line a distance of 303.46
feet tb the beginning of a nontangent• curve, 'concave W&sterly, having a
radius of 55.00 feet, a radial_lipp from said beginning bears
---South .71036,48" West; thence toutheasterly,als d Southerly along said curve,
through a central angle ofA113°3k'41Y�,an arc distance of 109.03 feet
to the True Point of Beginning of this description. I
CONTAINING: 0.753 acres, more or less, gross.. v /
•SUBJECT,TO: • 'All Covenants, 'Right6, Rights-of-Way and Easements,
of Record;
' , EXHIBIT""B" .attached and by this reference made a part hereof.
Raub, Bein, Frost & Associates - Exhibit,,"A' , . .'. Revision #2 March 20, 1970
Abandonment of a.Portion' of Bayside Drive Promontory Bay '
Page 2,of 2
Parcel 2 I
BEGINNING at an angle point in the Southerly right-of-way line
of Bayside Drive- as conveyed to the County of Orange by deed recorded in ' '
Book 830, page 217 of Official Records, records of said.,,Orange County,wYO-
California, said point being a 1 1/2" iron pipe an�anil� as shown on a
map of Tract No. 4003, recorded in Book 188, pages 13 through . 0J;'ll clu-
sive, of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County, California;
thence alongsaid Southerly right-of-wayline of y Bayside Drive, `
south 84046'33" Nest, 1170.60 feet; thence leaving said'Southerly right-
of-way line North 5013'27" East, 69.30 feet to the True Point of Beginning '
of this description, said point being 'in a nontangent curve, concave
Northwesterly, having a radius of 100.00 feet, a radial line at said point : '
bears North 1904violl West; thence Northeasterly along said curve, through ,,.
a central angle of 8059128", an arc -distance of 15.69 feet; thence non-
thencetangent• to said curve North 84046,33" West, 13.66 feet; . "
Sout# 5°13127" West, 7.70 feet to the True'Point of Beginning.
y CONTAINING: 0.001 acres, 'more or less,- gross.,
SZTBJECT'TO:• 'All Covenants, Rights, Rights-of-Way.aad Easements'
:." of Record. '
EXHIBIT•"B'.' attached and by this, reference'made ,a part hereof.
. t' '+S' • William am S. Fros ,-Lafid Surveyor
w • •�}i: 1. ••i '1�•. •+ r
i. '1•. it . • '1' ' • r .t'
1 , ',• , • ,
•R.83 .. a
P,OiS' SAYSIDE 0/ZI7 +3
oI
S 46'3 m 84- SEE DETAIL A
3" >o
• _ A
' E ,
WIMAIL 1242•50' M \
PER TZ-4005o M•M, DRIVE p ,
188/13-t4 - /
r
• fl +, ire i\\ril7�'•!: , 'r,, " ��Qa��.`�� '• •• Q�
cv
td
kOS.�3'�0' old CP/p��gy bb� CaP m
./` c c / y
b SAYSID y.C, G3?� T, I} a qc ryq�/ '^'��' m
p,0,8gil. . 0 �
84°46 A Dc� .
4. - 33" ?E 1112.61' _ �. ..� U64446• r'Q ;p�''m^'n Q
b03.4C, N /�p4 .»
F $. Sg4.S83 E 1z42 Sao t en
P�2ce11 .r a`� 1�v
0. 1}�z°1.? 446'33" Qo k1 1
?ER Tq 400/MAIL -1 90• 4v '110o 46'33„E 716,
8g�Is-f9•� S.M.�M. Q l�d:113
41'
DETAIL„Ai, L�-�09 3441
ro 11..
SCALE .B
V. 2gp0'327"ECRAq)
;EXNIgIT " gl,
SILEIC1 TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL OESCRIPTIOM ' FOQ' A6AMV0M 16NT
.,OF A PORTIOM OF 6AY5( DE DRIVE
BEING A P07TIO9 OF BLOCK 94OF IRVIMES S66DIVISl014 AS S90AM OM A
MAP RECORDED W 80041) PAGE 38.0F MISCELLAUEOUS MAPS} RECORDS OF
OIZA}dGE COUMTY, CALIFORI•lIA.
PWAARED 6Y'
RAUb, BEpd, FFOST� ASSOC., DATE 3.20.70
136 ROCUH5TER STREET
COSTA MESA, CALIF. �0 q�p /�pop� .105 U0. rR.38b7
CITY Y OF NEWPORT BE-ACH DRAWN DATE =7-20-70
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT APPROVED
ABAUDONMENT 01✓ 'A PORTION PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
R.E. NO.
OF I3Ay51DL .DIZIUE DRAWING No.K/W5117- L
RAUB, BEIN, FROST & ASSOCIATES
136 Rochester Street
Costa Mesa, California
Revision #1 March 6, 1970
March 3, 1970
Promontory Bay
Page 1 of 1
D E S C R I P T I O N
Exhibit "A"
Abandonment of a Portion of Bayside Drive
That portion of Block 94 of Irvine's Subdivision as shown on
a map thereof, recorded in Book 1, page 88 of Miscellaneous Renard Maps,
records of Orange County, California, described as follows:
BE angle oint in the Southerly right-of-way line
GINNING at anp
of Bayside Drive as convey,d to the County of Orange by deed recorded in
Book 830, page 217 of Official Records, records of said Orange County,
California, said point being a 1 1/2" iron pipe and nail as shown on a
map of Tract No. 4003, recorded in Book 188, pages 13 through 20, inclu-
sive, of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County, California;
thence along said Southerly right-of-way line of Bayside Drive,
south 8046'33" East, 1288.61 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this
description; thence continuing South 84046'33" East along said Southerly
right-of-way line of Bayside Drive a distance of 670.31 feet to the
beginning of a nontangent curve, concave Northeasterly, having a radius
of 892.00 feet, a radial line from said beginning beers
North 5013'27" East; thence Northwesterly along said curve, through a
central angle of 23°58'52", an are distance of 373.35 feet to a point
in a line parallel with and 77.00 feet Northerly of said Southerly right-
of-way line of Beyside Drive, a radial line from said point bears
North 29°12119" East; thence North 84146133" West along said parallel
line a distance of 325.30 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve,
concave Westerly, having a radius of 55.00 feet, a radial line from said
beginning bears South 36°30148" nest; thence Southeasterly and Southerly
along said curve, through a central angle of 91045'55", an are distance
of 88.09 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description.
CONTAINING. 0.748 acres, more or less, gross.
cVBJECT TO: All Covenants, Rights, 'Rights-of Way and Basements
of Record.
EXHIBIT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof.
i
WI AM J. FRO"d Surveyor
r i
COMPILATION OF STAFF REPORTS ,TO PLANNING. COMMISSION FROM
PLANNING� DEP-ARTMENT REGARDING -•PROPOSE'D PROMONTORY .BAY DEVELOPMENT' '
~ SUBJECT: Master Plan 'Amendment No . 25 ' ( Item 18)
Proposal to amend Master Street and Highway Plan ' •
by realigning Bayside ' Drive between East Coast -
Highway and Jamboree Road (Marine Avenue) anal-also •,;;
to close a section of 'existing Bayside Drive -west-
erly of Jamboree Road (Marine Avenue ) .
.. Use Permit Appl'ication ' No . 1466 ( Item 19)
Request to permit development of a- residential
area of single family dwelling units , with support-
ing commercial and recreational facilities , to in-
clude a yacht basin and 'maritra.
", `;,.• Tentative Map Tract Na. 3867 , ( Item 20)
Request to permit subdivision of 24 .0± acres 'into
62, residential lots.; and Lot "A" reserved for
waterway purposes , Lot: "B" ••reserved for planted
area, Lot "C" reserved ' for common waterway access I
area , Lot "D", reserved 'for parki ng 'and marina . '! .
facility, Lot , "E" reserved for.
park 'site ' and
` .Lot 63 reserved for commercial, site.
LOCATION: Portion of• Block '94 of Irvine ' s Subdivision located '
•:., between Pacific Coast Hfghway 'and Bayside Drive , w•e•st
r• , . of Jamboree Road 1propdsed 'P.romonto•ry Bay) : {
ZONE: Unclassified ; C-N=H"and: R-3
. ' APPLICANT: The . Irvine Company', Newport Beach.'
; OWNER: ` Same as applicant
Application
Bayside Drive is designated as a' secondary highway on the Master
Street• and ' Hi'ghway Plan and ; therefore ,. the proposed realignment
of• Bayside Drive requires an. amendment to the master plan in .
accordance w,ith 'Sect•ion 19,20. 010 of - the Municipal Code ..
is • • , :, . ; - :
2
The proposed development is located in an unclassified "U" ?'
district and , therefore , requires a use permit in • accordance '
with Section 20 . 34. 020 of the Municipal Code .
• r
' Section 19.12. 101 of the Municipal Code requires the filing of
. a tentative map as the 'first step in subdivision of the .land :
into separate building lots" for sale or lease . a
, , Subject Property
The subject property includes Phase I of the proposed development
' consisting of ,Parcels 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , and 9 as •shown on the proposed
Land Use Plan for Use Permit No .' 1466 , as submitted by the Irvine _
Company . Phase I'I of the proposed development would be the subject , ` .,;',:.
of a separate use permit application in the future . This phase
would include Parcels 5 , 6 , 7 and 8 , which are shown for informa-
tion only. These parcels lie north of the proposed realignment -
of Bayside Drive, and. comprise the existing Bayside Shopping Center, . '
a limited expansion 'of this center to the west, and an apartment
development of all the high . ground known as Promontory - Point as
well as a small area of . land at ,a lower elevation bordering Bayside• . - .
Drive.
Surrounding Uses
The, following properties surround the proposed development and are "
affected -by the realignment of Bayside Drive :
7 . Balboa Yacht Basin (land leased from City of Newport., ;
Beach) . City Manager' s office is investigating "
the possibility of retaining an appraiser 'to study
the effect which realignment of Bayside Drive
would have, on this ,property.
2. Beacon Bay (land leased from City of Newport Beach ) : •
This property would also be included in the ap-
praiser' s study . However , the Staff feels that
due to the reduction
• of traffic on existing Bay-
side Drive (which could permit use of the rear
access to Beacon Bay ) , the Beacon Bay residential
property would benefit ..
3. Reside'nces adjacent to Harbor Isle Drive .
At present these residences front on a very busy
street with potentially dangerous problems of
driveway access . Staff feels the reduction in
traffic resulting from the realignment of , Bayside . :
:• ' Drive would benefit these 'homes and decrease
the traffic hazards . ;
4. ' Bayside Shopping Center. , The propos-ed• realignment
of Bayside Dri've •would' cut ' through the southwest
corner of the parking lot which would necessi -
tate redesigning a portion ,of the driveway access
and parking layout.. The driveway connection shown
on •the . Tentative M'a,p would require further ,study . .
1
3
5 . Apartments .-along south side of Bayside Drive be-
tween Villa Marina Motel and Shark Island Yacht
Club . These -apartments now have direct frontage -
on Bayside Drive but would not have direct frontage .' .
on the, proposed realignment . Further study ,of. ,
acces.s would be necessary. '
Master^ Plan Amendment No . 25
This application requests approval to realign Bayside Drive
between East Coast Highway- and Jamboree Road , and to close a
section of existing Bayside Drive westerly of Jamboree Road .
Approval of this application would require that the information ,..• .
presented show to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission
that the amendment to the Master Street and Highway- Plan- as cop
templated would not 'have a detrimental effect ' on adjacent pro-. .'
perties , the neighborhood , 'or the community. 2r.
The proposed amendment could have the following -benefits :..: ' i
1 . - Th'e new alignment would be more direct than
the' existing alignment, ' •;<<.
An existing sharp curve would be eliminated.. ... .'.
3 .• Direct access to the arterial street would be ' •
eliminated from approximately '12 homes having -
garages so 'located -,as to - requi'r•e backing onto
the street.
4. An existing poor intersection connecting, Harbor. . "
Island Road to the arterial'' street would be .
greatly improved .,
5 . The easterly .:entrance to . Beacon B_ay coul'd 'be
opened and made 'us.able;.
6 . Access to any future development north .of the
proposed realignment could be taken directly : i
from Bayside Drive .
The proposed amendment, could rai'se •the following questions :
. 1 .' Th•e operators of businesses -located on the Balb-o'a
Yacht Basin property ( hand leased from. City of
Newport Beach ) believe they could be adversel'y '.•
affected by the lower -traf•ftc volumes on existing,"* : ',•• `
Bayside Drive.'
„'. 2. The proposed realignment would necessitate re-
designing a portion- of- the, Bays'ide 'Shopp.ing Center•
parking 1 ot.. . .
4' -
3: A portion of the apartments along the south side of
Bayside Drive adjacent to the Shark Island •Yacht
Club would 'not have direct access to. the proposed
realigned Bayside •Drive .
It is the •opinion of staff that Bayside Drive would more efficiently.,"..
" -'serve the community in the capacity of a secondary highway in the'-
proposed realigned lo.cation : Staff, -therefore ,- recommends• ap-
proval of this application- subject to the following conditions :'.,:
1 . Th-at, the Bayside Shopping •Center parking lot be
redesigned" to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director , and constructed concurrently with con-
struction of realigned Bayside Drive .
2. That access requirements to the Shark- Island, ..
Yacht Club and- the adjacent apartments be
restored to, the satisfaction of the Planning
Director.
Use Permit Application No. 1466
This application requests -approval of the general land use concept : ...,',, .," ' .'
of parcels 1 , 2 , 3, 4 -and 9 as shown on the proposed land use plan
submitted by. the Irvine Company. Approval of this application
would require that the proposed use of these parcels would be com-
patible with and not detrimental to' the ordinary maintenance , devel-
opment and redevelopment of . the surrounding area as, determined by
the Planning Commission .
The existing and, proposed uses and existingzoning o.f the g parcels.,.' '
'comprising Phase ' I are approximately as f.ollow:`".: ,; :
Zo_ ning ' .Existing Use Proposed Use
Parcel #1 -U
Vacant
Lagoon
on
:R-3 Boat Repair ` ; Channel'
Facility
Parcel #2 =U s. Vacant ,,' ',Marina ` Faci I ! ty`'
and Parking
Parcel #3 R=3' Yacht Club '•Marina • Related' '
Commercial
a c• P r elz 4 -3. Vacant . . . ,# 'R and 'Come Com
mercial
ial. r
Public Right
of-Way ' :
Parcel , #9, -U V,a'cant Single Family ;
_
• _ Residentia 1 ,
It is the opinion of Staff that the lagoon and surrounding single;'. :
family residential development would be compatible with 'the gen : .' •':
' eral character of the surrounding area and the Newport Tomorrow , '-
Goals Report which stresses ••a harbor related• environment. I
It is also the feeling of Staff that commerciaA uses of Parcels
#2 , 3 and 4 'could be compatible with the surrounding land use's . 1
However, more detailed ,informatio'n ,regarding these parcels would ,,
b'e desirable , and they are not subject to further review if ,.un- .
conditionally approved under this use permit .
It is the opinion of Staff that the proposed Promontory` Bay Devel -
opment concept would be an asset to the community over alternative,, .,-
traditional developments . Staff, therefore , recommends approval
of Use Permit No. 1466 subject to the following condltians :
1 . That approval of Use Permit No . '1466 be subject
to satisfactory demonstration of the engineering
feasibility'•of the pro.posed lagoon design and
issuance of a 'harbor permit, (See report to
Joint Harbor Committee from ,City of Newport: Beach.
Harbor and Tidelands Administrator attached. )
2. That an amendment.'•to• the Master Street . and -Highway
Plan is .approved.
3. That Parcel No . 4 be approved in pp principle —only,
and be subject 'to a separate use permit.- ".
4. . That final plans for the relocation of the Sh'ark
Island Yacht Club on Parcel No. . 3 b•e ' subject to
approval of the Planning Director.
5,• That Parcel No., 2 ,(.parking and marina - facility)% .,t
, be approved in principle- only, and be subject to
a separate Use permit. !
Tentative Map Tract No . 3867 '
• This ,application requests approval of the Tentative' Tract Map fo.r',
Lots 1 through . 63 and Lots "A" through .." E" as • shown•,on. the• tenta
tive map which coincides with. Parcels 1 , 2 ,: 4 a'nd 9 • a's'.shown' on
the Land - UsePlan' fop Use Permit No. 1466:
- 6 -
i
Statistical Analysis - ,!
Estimated Estimated "
Parcel Proposed . Population Total
No. Use Acres D/U per 'D/U Population -
•1 Lagoon
and'• 11 . 0
Marina
2 Marina
Facilities 2. 1
3 Marina .
- - Related . , 4
Commercial
4 Commercial 1 : 2 ;
9 Single
Family 11 . 5 62 3 '186
TOTAL ' 26,2 62 3 186
Development Characteristics '
RESIDENTIAL (Lots 1 -62) - The Tentative Map proposes 62 si'ngle !:
family residential lots surrounding the• greater part of the pro-
posed lagoon : The Tentative Map includes a typical cross section-• ' ;-r;a
showing the proposed1 agoon and the relationship - of lots and .4 " '
streets on both sides . -Other drawings on the Tentative Map show .. . ..
•typical• building sites and street sections . Single family resi
dential" lots have the following characteristics :
A, Size 'and Shape . The proposed development is in
conformity with the minimum requirements 'of
Section 19 . 20. 110 of the Municipal Code regarding ,
area (not less than 5000 sq . ft. average ) , width
(not less than 50 ft. average ) , and depth (not
less than 80 ft. average ) .
•.B. Access . Access to lots adjacent to the proposed
realignment of Bayside Drive would utilize drive-
ways located' on common lot lines with turnaround
areas so that vehicles would not necessarily be
required to back into the street. The Planning .
Commission recently approved this concept of
driveway design for another Irvine Company devel -
opment of 12 lots along Bayside Drive near: E1 Pas.eo
Drive. Access to lots adjacent to existing Bayside "
Drive is provided by conventional driveways . How-
ever , Lots, 29 through 34 and •42-44-, due to their
location at intersections and on the curvature of
the road , have limited sight distances . The turn-
around driveway concept: properly could also, app•l,y
to these 'lots .
- 7
C. ,Setbacks . • Setbacks ' are as follow:
1 .• ' Rear Yard - 10 ' Minimum
2 . Sidd 'Yard - 4' Minimum' " '
3. ,Front Yard. - 10 ' Min'. -Realigned Bayside Drive,
17 ' Min . -Existing Bayside Drive
Staff recommends that the front yard setback on exist-
ing Bayside Drive should be, 20 *feet minimum in the
dri'veway area to prevent biocking 'of the public, side- •
walk and right-of-way .
D. , Grading. Lots 46 through 62 are split-level with
approximately 9 ' difference in pad elevations . A
retaining wall separates a portion of Lot 45 from
Lot 46 .'
,.WATERWAY (LOT "A" ) - ,The entry channel to the proposed lagoon is,"'
proposed to be cut through property owned by the Irvine Company ,
now occupied by Shark Island Yacht Club . The channel• location
would be immediately adjacent to City-owned property occupied by
- the Balboa Yacht Basin . The Irvine Company has 'applied t6 ;the
Army Corps of Engineers for the necessary navigation permit.. Thb
Corps as part of the 'processing of the permit will make water
quality and hydraulic determinations as well as coordinate with
other agencies such as the Department of Interior , State Fish and
Game , and the Regional Water Quality , Control Board. . .Approximately,
thirty days are required for the Corps to process a navigation
permit, at which time the results will be included in the applica.
tion for a harbor permit.
The City Council has asked the Staff to prepare a study on the
question of private vs . public waterway for the lagoon proposal .,
This topic will - be discussed at the joint Harbor Committee Meet- ' `
on February 10 , 1970 , and will also be a consideration, in '
the application for a harbor permit. One of the questions for
Planning Commission consideration regarding the 'lagoon is the
general concept of- adding additional. waterways to the existing'
'harbor.
LOT "B" (Planted Area) .- This is a planting area that forms
part of the intersection between the proposed realignment of
Bayside Drive and the existing Bayside Drive. (.Note : A new
name would be necessary for the portion of existing Bayside Drive' , :
which would no longer be . part of the through route : ' One name
which has been suggested is` ••Harbor Isle Drive . ) • Staff, is `of the
opinion that the proposed intersection would function- 'satis-
factorily; however, ' the connecting street should .be 52 feet in
width between exterior curbs in. order t'o' provide for a 20 foot
entering roadway,, an ' 8 'f6.ot,:median , , an,d a ,24 foot.' existing' road-
way
LOT "C" - This is a common waterway access area and beach for
Lots 42 .through 45 . :•
LOT "D" (Marina Facilities and Parking ) - Lot "D" is located
adjacent to the proposed realignment of Bayside• Drive and is an`
adjunct to the marina, ,providing space for parking and rest room
facilities . The parking lot , 17-sli:p marina and dry boat storage ,• .',
facility provide a window-to-the-bay approximately 800 • feet in ,
length .
Parking requirements •,fo,r the marina and small bdat dry ".to"rage' ,
include:
17 slips @ . 75. space per boat slip 13 "
40 storage spaces @ '. 25 space per dry storage •spaces,
Total, Requi red Spaces 2'3 '.
The proposed parking area presently shows 18 parking space's . I
Redesign would- be necessary to provide 8 additional parking,
' spaces , or reduce the number of- slips and/or dry boat
storage spaces . .
This . portion of the project offers an opportunity to create a truly '
.outsta'nding relationship between water, ,docks , roadway , pedestrian
. : ways , and the development inland from Bayside Drive . Maximum advan-
tage should be obtained from the differences in elevation and the
area should be thoughtfully designed , to • provide for landscaping ,
benches , etc.
LOT "E" (Park Site ) ' - Lot "E" is located adjacent to the west' •s'ide
of the proposed waterway at the point where existing Bayside Drive-
would be closed and terminated in a c•ul -de-sac.• The Tentative Map,.', ,•, . ;
shows the cul -de-sac centered on Bayside Drive and overlapping onto;
City'' property at the Balboa Marina; this could raise certain prob
,lems . However, it is important that the turning area be fully adequate for larger vehicles; in view of the length of the cul -de-„
sac , and possible use of, the road by Targe vehicles , trailers
transporting boats , etc.
The park site would be an additional asset to the '•community, pro-• '
viding a window-to-the-bay with possibilities for 'adjacent parking;. ;
The portion of Lot "E" not included in the public right-of-way,
resulting from the closing of Bayside Drive , should be dedicated
to- the City, and the existing right-of-way of Bayside Drive should
bq retained under publ'.ic control .
LOT 63 (Commerci'al Site ) .- '. One proposal for this site is a
restaurant to be located on that portion north of the present
right-of-way of Baysi'de ,Drive . Further information and study-
would be necessary concerning the relationship between Lot. 63
and Parcel No . -3 as shovin• on the proposed land' use plan , us well .
as the . previousl,y mentioned apartment complex . "'
' 9
PARCEL 3 , AS SHOWN ON PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN FOR USE PERMIT 1466
( Commercial Site) - The proposed channel would necessitate the
removal of the existing Shark Island Yacht C1•ub . One proposal
for use of Parcel 3 would be to accommodate replacement facilities
for the yacht club . Further. information •and study is' necessary
regarding this parcel .
: UTILITIES - This project invo.lves major questions of reconstruc
"lion and/or relocation of existing utilities to avoid conflict
.. -,with the proposed channel crossing . The largest single question
involves rerouting of the existing 21" trunk sewer line of Orange
County Sanitation District- No . 5 which serves ,Bdlboa Island and .
•Irvine Terrace as well as a large part of Corona del* Mar. One ;of•
the alternative plans now under consideration for serving the future :
requirements of Sanitation District ' No. 5 would involve expansion
of this sewer• to• 39" diameter., The 'questions involving utility
relocation have been identified and are under study by •the 'Irvine .
Company, the, public and private utility agencies involved, -and .the . • '
' City Public Works Department.
- STREET STANDARDS - Comments from the City' Engineer are contained
in the' attached memorandum dated January 28 , 1970 . Standards shown
on the Tentative Map for existing Bayside Drive appear to be satis-
factory , with the exception of questions 'concerning the cul -de-sac .
. at the east end , and the intersection between existing Bayside j
Drive and the proposed relocation of Bayside Drive.
• _ I
• . The alignment shown on the Tentative Map appears to be satisfactory,
except that a 'length ,of tangent should be provided between ,the two a,
reversing curves -at the east end of the development adjacent to
the existing Bayside Shopping Center.
Consideration has been given to designing -the relocated Bayside
Drive to intersect Pacific 'Coast Highway east of. the .Iverson Volks-
wagen Agency rather than -west of the Bayside Inn . Information has ,: -- ..
been received from the California Division of Highways indicating :
that such' a connection would be feasible so far as design of the
Pacific -Coast Freeway is concerned; however, a freeway crossing of
Bayside Drive east' of the Volkswagen Agency would not be compatible .
with a freeway grade- separation serving a north entrance to Promon-
tory Point, west of Jamboree Road. Such a relocation of Bayside
'Drive might offer opportunities for increasing the available land
area adjacent to the upper end of proposed Promontory Bay and
plifying• intersection design . The advantages' and disadvantages of , ••",'.'
any such relocation are under study:' Any of these proposed relo
cations of Bayside drive offer opportunities for shortening the
length of the main thoroughfare ,, improving ' ali•gnment and .reducing.,
traffid• past single family homes along the west. side•,of 'existing, •,, . . •, '
Bayside Drive .'
The,'attached drawings illustrate three possible• typical sections
for the relocation ,of, Baysi,de Drive . . .Alternate :A is. the proposal .,.. ,
of . the Irvine Company as shown 'on . the Tentative Map . Alternate B; ,.. : •
1 �, l0 ti .
has been proposed by the Public Works Department and is based on
four travel lanes, a•n optional left-tu,rn median and parking 'along
the south side only. Alternate C has been proposed by the Plan
ning Department and is based on a separate frontage road serving
single family dwellings and a four lane major street with' no- park
ing on either- side and a variable median allowing left turns only t
at intersections .
-Traffic studies have been presented by consultants for the Irvine ' .
Company 'indicating a potential reduction in average daily .traffic '•
on Bayside Drive to 6 ,500 vehicles from th•e• present flow of 13',000
to 16 ,000 vehicles . This is based on anticipated 'diversion of f traffic following completion of the Pacific Coast Freeway.• f
Section 19. 20. 050 of the Municipal Code requires - "when the front
of any lots abuts any major, primary or secondary.street or high-
way ; the subdivider shall be required to__dedicate and improve a .
'service road to provide ingress or egress to and .from ,such lots
" The Irvine Company has asked a waiver of this requirement
stating the following reasons :
1 : Traffic studies presented by consultants for the ,
Irvine Company indicate a potential reduction in
average, daily traffic on Bayside Drive t'o •6 ,500
vehicles from the present flow of 13 ,000 to 16 ,000 , `
vehicles . This is based on anticipated diversion
of traffic following completion of the Pacific
Coast Freeway. +
2. The Irvine Company proposes driveways along
realigned Bayside Drive with 'adequate turn-
around areas provided so that vehicles need not
back into the street.
3. The Irvine ' Company states that their studies '
indicate that a service road will not provide ': "
a more desirable environment or enhance the
marketability ofthe _lots in this proposed '
development..
4. Reduction of existing curb cuts now -taking access
onto Bayside Drive ,from•. 18 to 12 or 17 to 11 . .
1'
The Planning Department believes a waiver of the service road `
requirement should .be denied for the following reasons :
1 . .The Staff agrees that there could be a, diversion ,
of traffic when the freeway is completed and
that Bayside Drive could function with d'riveway
accesses . However , Bayside Drive is classified
as a secondary highway with a 45 m.p. h . speed
limit. Even if present traffic volumes should
be reduced , at these speeds it would •n'ot be
desirable to front single family ,residences on
Bayside Drive. Furthermore , due to minimum -lot
area and maximum building coverage , driveways
fronting on this street will be one of the main
areas for children 'to' piay.
2. . Due to minimum front yard setbacks ,and traffic
volumes , environmental qualities are jeopardized •
by fumes and noise levels . A frontage road would' •
provide additional separation .
3. It will be a minimum of eight years until the ,.
:freeway will be opened for traffic .
4. In the location of the previously approved'
turnaround type drives , Bayside Drive is not
serving in .the capacity of a secondary highway.
With a parking lane to Bayside Drive which
could possibly limit sight distances and the
increased speed limit , the turnaround type
driveway is .less desirable in this location . ;
Environmental values represent the essentially intangible, un-
• quantifiable essence of .a community' s character and meaning .
The ' Planning Department believes that these-values should not
be compromised .
Staff has previously noted the minimum setbacks as shown on the
tentative map, are within the minimum requirements of applicable
ordinances . However , front yard setback lines may be determined
by the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 19 . 20. 110 •(c)
.of the Municipal Code . Staff believes ' that strict conformance to
minimum provisions of the' ordinance could produce a very static
and sterile environment, both from land and water. . Staff suggests •
,that the Irvine Company file a setback plan as a part of this
application' allowing for variation of front and rear setback lines .
Staff recommends approval of Tentative Map' Tract No, - 3867 subject'' ,
to the following conditions :
1 . That' final approval be subject to the approval
of •Use •Permit •'1466 and the conditions 'thereto. ;
12 -
2. '' That final approval of the subdivision be subject,
to approval of an appropriate revision to the
Master Plan of Streets ..and Highways . (Public ..
hearings required. )
3. That final . approval of the subdivision be subject
to the apandonment of certain existing public
rights-of-way as contemplated and to satisfactory
arrangements being made for ,dedication and im-
provement of the new rights-of-way required.
(Public hearing required. )
4. That final approval of the subdivision be subject '
to satisfactory arrangements being made to re- '
locate existing facilities of the Orange County
Sanitation District and of other affected utilities . ,'
5. That Section- 19 . 20 .'050 of the Municipal Code re-
quiring a service road not be waived , and that
the cross section for realigned Bayside Drive
shall be in accordance with Alternate "C"• of
the attached drawings .
6. ; That access to Lots • 27 through 34 , 42 through 44
(and unless a frontage road is provided - all
parcels along realigned Bayside Drive ) , be pro
vided, by • means, of drives located on common lot
lines , each drive serving two parcels ; and that
adequate turnaround areas be provided so that
vehicles need not back into the street. Cross
easements or non-barrier agreements satisfactory ,'
to the City Attorney shall be provided so as to
guarantee perpetuation of the access arrangement.
7. That unless a. frontage road is provided , the
right-of-way width of realigned Bayside Drive
be at least 86 feet and the curb-to-curb width
be at least 70 feet. This cross section will "
provide for 4 travel, lanes , 2 eight foot wide
parkways , a twelve foot wide median left turning'
lane and an eight foot wide parking lane on the
southerly. side . (Alternate ".B" on the ,attached
..• drawings . )
8. That the new cul -de-sac be' located entirely on
the developer ' s land.,
9. That the design of the' new intersections of 're
aligned Bayside' Dri-ve with exi sti ng' Baysi de' ,
.-.`Drive be subject t,o review' and approval by the' '
C i ty..
10. , That all improvements be constructed as required
by ordinance and the Public Works Department.
11 . - That the boundary of the final tract may be
checked by the County Surveyor before being sub-
• .mitted to the City for approval .
12. That all gra'ding be in accordance with grading
plans and reports approved by the Public Works ;
Director and a qualified Soils Engineer. Upon.'
completion of the grading the Civil Engineer
and the Soils Engineer shall certify that th.e
grading has• been completed in accordance with
the plans , the soils report and the grading
ordinance . Reproducible copies of the plans on
standard size sheets shall be furnished to the •.
Public Work's Department.
13. . That the connecting street southeasterly of '
Lot " B" be 52 feet in width between exterior
curbs -in order to provide for a twenty foot
entering roadway , an eight foot median and a
twenty-four foot exiting roadway.
14. That all driveways be a minimum of twenty feet
in Tength from the property line to ensure no .
, parking will be in the public right-of-way.
15. : The portion of Lot " E" not included in . the ,
public right-of-way , resulting from the closing
of Bayside Drive', be dedicated to the City , and
the existing right-of-way of Bayside Drive,west
of the proposed waterway b�. retained under public
control .'
.;;;• 1,6,. A length of tangent be' provided between' the two
reversing curves at the east end of the developr
ment adjacent to the existing Bayside Shopping
Center.
17. • 'Parkway trees be installed on all public rights-
of-ways in accordance with Parks , Beaches and "
Recreation Department specifications .
18, Appropriat'e 'landscaping be installed on all
slopes anal vacant -spaces resulting from this
development.
19. ' A setback plan allowing for a variation of-.
front and -rear setback lines be submitted to .
the Planning Director for approval .
- 14 -
20. That there be no City financial obligations
connected with construction of realigned' �I
Bayside Drive.
21 . That realigned Bayside Drive be constructed to
its full width in connection with the, develop-
ment of Tract- 3867.
RODNEY • L. GUNN
Assistant Planner
RLG/kk ;
Attachments *' Report to Joint Harbor .Committee.
from Harbor Administrator
Typical Cross Sections
Land .Use Plan
i
III
NEWPORT FINANCIAL PLAZA o 550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE o NEWPORT 6EACH,CALIFORNIA 92G60 0(734)6414.3012
February 5, 1970
Planning Commission
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach? California
Gentlemen:
PROMONTORY BAY ,
Recognizing the complexity of the project before you, The
Irvine Company would take this opportunity to submit the j
following comments to assist you in your deliberations -
relative to Promontory Bay. It is recognized that a number
of additional events and public hearings must be held
regarding this project to include such items as Use Permit
0 1466 ; an amendment to the Master Plan of Arterial Highways ;
the approval of Tentative Tract Map #3867 ; a meeting before ,
the Joint Harbor Committee and the U. S . Army Corps of w
Engineers -regarding the yacht lagoon; and discussions with
the City Council concerning the above matters plus a public
hearing on closing •a portion of existing Bayside Drive and
approval of a harbor permit
It has been proposed 'both by the City of Newport Beach City • ;
Council and the city staff that all items related to
Promontory Bay be considered by the City Council at its
meeting March 23 . This procedure has been agreed to by
The Irvine Company as being a logical step -in ascertaining
the .total ,impact and merits of this project on the surround- , .
ing community. Further, it is recognized that not all the
items outlined in the first paragraph will be considered`
at the Planning Commission level, therefore, additional
review should,be 'provided at such time as all data is
--
2,
available. However, The Irvine Company has endeavored to
supply the planning staff with sufficient- information at
this time in order that the Planning Commission may tare
action on the land use elements of the proposed plan. , Realizing
that certain policy decisions must be made by the City
Council which affect the development of this property The.
Irvine Company would agree that any matter considered and
approved by the Planning Commission (to include the use
permit and tentative tract map) could be conditioned in
such a manner that no action would be considered final
until such time as the City Council were to make the afore-
mentioned policy decisions regarding the project.
Specifically, The Irvine Company would agree to the following
conditions being made a part of the hearing on the use 'permit
and/or tentative tract map:
1. That the validation of the use permit be dependent upon
approval of the City Council of a harbor permit for the
dredging of the yacht lagoon, the severance of existing
Bayside Drive and the -relocation of Bayside Drive to
the approximate position as indicated on Tentative-
Tract Map #3867.. ;
2. That the -land use' shown northerly of the proposed Bayside
Drive on •the 'Precise Land Use Plan submi-Eted as an
exhibit with the use permit .application„ is in no way
approved by the •Planning Commission but is merely an
information item indicating the possible development
plans of The Irvine Company for that portion of this
property. .
3 . That upon final approval of the project by the City
Council, The Irvine Company will' immediately initiate.',
rezoning procedures to zone the subject property in
conformance with the proposed land -uses .
4. That no structures be developed on the south side of
the proposed 'Bayside Drive between areas No. 2 and No. 4
(as shown on the Precise Land Use Plan) which would
obstruct' view potential to the new yacht basin and
access channel. (This condition would not be meant to
preclude the installation. of land'scapirig or prohibit. ;
the interruption cf view caused by boats harbored in . . .
the commercial yacht marina.) •
5 . That proposed solutions to, any problems of access to
adjacent parcels (i.e. , parcels No. 3, ' 4, and 6 on the
Precise Land Use Plan) be 'subject to the review and
approval .of 'the Public Works Department.
6. That engineering. information provided concerning '-the
proposed yacht basin be of such sufficient detail that
favorable action be taken by all necessary legislative
bodies regarding the approval and -release of permits
relative to the creation of this land use.
It is -hoped •that- the above information will assist the- Planning
Commission in its considerations of this matze-r.
Very truly yours,
James E. Taylor '
General Planning Administrator
eU '
r
U ,
NEWPORT FINANCIAL PLAZA a 650 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE o NEWPORT CEACH,CALIFORNIA 92660 ei714)644.30:1
January 14,, 1970 . . . , .
Planning Commission ,
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard .
Newport Beach, California ', ;
Gent lemen• . .
' PROMONTORY POINT
As a result of recent discussions with' the Newport Beach
City Council and the city staff regarding procedures for
the processing of our application for Promontory Point,
The Irvine Company would respectfully request that action
on Use Permit Application #14.66 be col tinued until 'the
Planning Commission meeting of February 5, 1970. •
The staff, supported by the City Council, has proposed thaw ,
all items regarding this complex proposal be brought befo;-e' -
the Council at the- same time foridiscussion and action:
This is to include such issues as the land use oroposal,
tentative subdivision map, an amendment to the roaster Plan
of Arterials precipitated by the proposed relocation of
Bayside Drive, abandonment proceedings for portions of
existing Bayside Drive created by the proposed yacht •basin
channel, the harbor permit required to dredge- the yacht
3agoon, the proposal for future rezoning of the Site, 'and '
the -results of a property assessment study to be conducted
on city-owned property adjacent to the proposed development
in Beacon Bay.- In order to accomplish this goal, it will
be necessary for the •Planning Commission to also hold
hearings and take action, on many of tre same items to be
forwarded to- the. Cit�y Council. Therefore, "additional time
will be' necessary for preparation of exhibits and necessary,
legal advertising for, the appropriate -items .,.,
Planning Commission 2: January 14, 1970
It is anticipated that on February 5, The Irvine Company
will present a proposal to the Planning Commission which
will include the following: (a) Use Permit 01466, con-
taining' land use proposals for Promontory Point; (b) an
aiiicncbllent to -the Master Plan of Arterial Highways proposing
the relocation of Bayside Drive and; Kc) a tentative may ,
outlining the specific proposals for development of the
single -Family, lots , yacht basin, commercial marina, and
supporting commercial facilities for Phase 1 of the
development.
The city planning staff .can provide you urith more specific
information relative to the procedures decided upon and the
sequence and timing of action to be Taken relative to the
"• - project. Your cooperation in this -request Is greatly
appreciated. ;
Very truly, yours; ;
James E. Taylor
General Planning Administ-rato-r, -
eb
COMIANly-
NEWPORT FINANCIAL PLAZA 550 NEWPORT CCNTER DRIVE o NEWPORT REACH,CALIFORNIA 92CGO i724)G4:• 011
December 22; .1969
Planning Commission -{ -:, n . . ,. ^^c•'r�
City of Newport Beach q
3300 Newport Boulevard , MN
Newport Beach California ,j RRY."r•,r.T
r: s
• Geritlemen, •_ of rF( I,Y�%' .
PROMONTORY POINT
Submitted herewith is the- development plan of The Irvine
Company for the, property commonly referred to as Promontory f
Point. The plan proposes a homogenous community of single
family lots for "the construction of custom homes, multiple,
family residences and supporting commercial facilities ,
which are oriented 'toward a yacht basin and lagoon. -
The project is- divided into two (2) phases ., Phase I,, which
constitutes the basis of the present Use Permit application;' w
is comprised of sixty-two (62) single family lots , a ten (10)
acre lagoon with access to Newport Ba a commercial marina
with ancillary facilities , •and two (2 'commerciah.sites
totalling approximately two (2) acres'.
It is anticipated that construction of the thirty (30)
acre Phase I will commence in -the early part of 1970. The
remaining thirty-two (32) acres containing medium high
density residential units and an approximate two (2) acre
commercial site would be developed at a later date and• be
Subject to the approval of an additional Use Permit which
will provide specific information relative to densities , t
circulation and performance standards. It is propose'S
'chat Bayside .Drive be realigned co accommodate the lagoon. j.
Therefore, it is requested that• the City' of Newport Beach
initiate vacation proceedings for that portion' of existing „
Bayside Drive that will be eliminated by the access'.channel' _
and realignment. of,. said street. z.
Promontory Point.' •2. December 22, 1969
It is the intent of The Irvine Company to i.nitiate ,legis-
lative proceedings in order to zone- the subject area in
accordance with actual land uses subsequent to 'approval
of the Use Permit for Phase I. Further, the following
documents are included as a' part 'of the application in
order to provide the, Commission.with sufficient; info-rma-
tion upon which -to base its deliberations :'
l:." Legal Plat Map.
2. ' Topographic Map of Existing Conditions: :
3 . Site Plan for Phase I:
4. Statistical Analysi's for Phase .I.'
5 . Precise Land USe 'Plan for P-romonto"ry Point. .
Your consideration in• this mattLr is greatly appreciated.
Further, a 'representative 'of', The Irvine Company will be
present at" the public, hearing to' answer. any questions' you .;
may'have.
.Very truly :yours, . .
James E. Taylor :
General Planning Administrator::.
Enc.
Low
O'RvN/Gm 3
41'.§�
HAr,OOB COMMISSION KCNM E7H SAMPSON
•'`-'' .uonr '' DIR CCYOR-HARJORO, GLACe L'S 0 PAIRS
C. C. WACAI YiJOLLCY. CHAIRMAN , , • �ro /I�J 1 /•~ ,• ' .
YV. ALLL'N CRU33, ViGG•CNAIRMhN .{•„ ✓wV�., \ 1 j 1507 $AYStGZ CR,vC
FRANK F.MCAJ l\\\••� I\ (\ /"./ NCYIPOAY C.ACH. CAW. 0..1..42
DCAN C.SHULL,JR. , �Nt
FJSCRL N. HCNGON • M41Lr 7CLCPHONC I7741 0J4g3GO
• . January 14, 1970_ - • • • .. .,^."'-."- ,"..: .. . . . . .
,Mr. George M. Dawes ' • :: :• ,
Harbor and Tidelands Administrator
City of Newport Beach
City Hall , 3300 Newport. Boulevard
Newport Beach, California '9266O• ;
Dear Mr. Dawes
" t
,By letter, dated December 29, 1969; you requested that this office rev,Ie:v
The Irvine Company's marina development proposal far the area ccm�roniy,
reaerred to as Promontory point. The`Distr+ict°s. reply, as regards -to the.'
specific inquiries in your letter, is.,as follows: ;
? a. ' The Irvine Company's •proposaI ; 'in our opinion,- will affect -the '
use of Newport Harbor and, therefore, should be ,preserited. to
the Joint Harbor Comrnittee.
b'. Additional data is not .desired' at the present tune. However,
upon submittal of the proposal to the Joint Harbor Commitree, it
may be necessary to request information regarding .possible ,effects
on water quality; water cl'rculation, and erosion of. the public ' ..
beach area across from the enL, nce 'channel ;
Special conditions that may be desirabie 'to incorporate' into any ,}.
approvals should include the 'following: ,
(1) . Responsibility for maintenance of basin project depths.
(2) Establishment of -pier permit areas for- individual lots.'
(3) Dedication of water areas to public agency for enforcement. .
d. the possible effect of the development on the•iterns you mentioned
cannot be 'determincd without a 'deta'iied study, , {See reply to item 8
above) .
Should you deslre'to" discuss this' matter iri detail , it is suggested that you ;
contcct. the District's Dcvolcpmoni Engineer, Mr. R. Wingard, 8;,4-38l,t.,,•.'.
Yours very truly,
. - . . : t.��.:ci.;-I Sr'•J'ti'�O�Y, ai rc;ctgrf ,. .
KS a\�N:m7i:. i7w^r'-Orsp, ^aach-as and,
,•.+,a'\" tir.m� D EFII ARTM.I`NT 08 YHE AP,"OY
W \:\� L03 ANG3LC- D3:;YIRICT, CORP Or '::NC7.l=R-0
P. O. COX
LOS ANGCLCS, CALEFO^n IViA 033 - r
- •.".L / IN rMY T.CFZR 70
• � .. � sl'•b+��+D-E, 22 January 1970 .. ;
• • •. • ' . , • . it
Mr. George M. Dawes
Harbor & Tidelands Administrator, "
: City o i Newport Beach '
5300 Newport Boulevard. '
Newport Beach, Califoania 92660' "
1 Dear Mr. Dawes: ;
A copy of the proposal to alter a portion of lower Newport rarbor, f
as outlined in your submission to Mr. Herron of this office,' has
• been reviewed by the Coastal Engineering and Operations Branch.
• Mr. Herron discussed our preliminary findings with you in a
} telephone conversation on 15 ,7anuary 1970,
A detailed review will be given-this proposal when your formal
° reVest for a'navigation permit is•made. Our initial reaction is
as follows: i
a. Tidal exchange of waters in the newly created bay should
{ be studied to determine possible pollution effects.
J . b. The effect'of ebb tide currents from the proposed new •'
entrance should be studied to avoid any adverse erosion and/or"
{ shoaling effects 'on the banks of the existing channel. i
c. it does not appear desirable to extend harbor lines into f'
the proposed basin. '
~ d. A navigation permit will be required to,'connect'thc pro-
' • posed basin and entrance -channel to the.existing navigatian"channel.. j
i At least 30 days should be allowed to process thi,s'permit request. ,
If you desire-further information on the proposal, please do not �.
-ate nr ;hesit '
sincerely Ours,
Cu A.rr\�p'uty Di Engineer:�nginoor'. .
• •• '.... . •`'. . :;.': of .. . "' . . .. . .
r •. .. '.
" :,, r;. Rio;.' •,�;;•,,.:'r.{�,yib; )fi}..,`?'r•..:,..'. ::�..•{'it ,
,
CITY 01? NIMPOM' M ACII
RkRL? BEACkIGS RECREATION CC��,'viISSION •
January 9,'•1970.' {'
TO: PLANT WING COMMISSION
PROM: . PB & R Cofmmis§ion
SUBJECT: USE PERNILIT #1466 (PRaMONTORY' POINT)
iivine Company plans ',for the development of Promontory Point 'and
the contiguous land area adjacent to Bayside Drive through Use Permit 41466
were reviewed at the PB' f? R Commission meeting of January 6th. ,
PB 6 R Commission considers this area to be one o£'the most signi£i-
' cant in Netivport Beach as far as land use, windovrs .to the Bay and public access
are concerned. It is with this thought in mind that this Commission hopes that
:; :•the Planning Commission•will not act too hastily in approval- b£ developmelit•plans, ';'.'. '..
After review, the PB F? R Commission approved in concept of the land I
use an4 felt that the,development as projected would be aft asset to the Corunun-...." :-
:' . ity. HoweveT;'once again additional people are being brought into the -City,
^• through a residential development, with:no public paxk or recreational"£acili, `::• :'
t,';.• ties' being provided: < :'.':, ' •• '•:•. I.
•+ ,. Since this is such a strategic location; the PB• $ R Commission
instructed its Liaison Committee with the Planning Commission .to meet in the',:;:; ..,,•;:•:•';
immediate future to discuss this development. , •It would be desirable if such' •::,.`::, ;,' ;.'•:. i
a meeting were to-take place prior to Planning'Commi.ssionts action on the
Irvine Company proposals. ,.',
Items that should be considered in'"4Tii liaison'mecting' would be
park sites and use, public,recreational areas,• vista'points 'and access to the'::;;::'.:` . " `•
•Bay, ,.. ,, , •, '' �i �.:<': ��,. ,., •..
your considerations`to•the.PB- F�;R'Conmii.ssion�'concenis''will:oe: very :' ;'•.` ` ': .' ,•: 'r
much C .
appreciated: ,.
• V. ' ':i•
'''�. . \ �l �, '•' �+—..cam'-_.
IJ
7. ."' /A\✓C. CAMERON,°JR. Chaixan
'`" .=���•' •:.:r<'1?C%}l:',<<"•.:� '. � • ''':: .'iir ' 'PdTkS9• BeaCheS`Fi'
):: L
,R6Creation,ComfTdssin ,•",
'1. 9:,-gfrr:1.. \...-tyJd .- v' .a• • 1,,,• :,[ rref' !
�. /��": •:r dl-:../: „r :r.. .�
,.Y• ,
i)
„
fr• •
. •I1' rN ' _
•t
,v
. i
i r o i
B A L�OA S'ACHT �ASI�7, Iwo, �r
02813AYOIOq OR, • NCWPORT 06ACN♦CALIF.02GG2 • 073.0202 j {,
i� COIIfofnlo•o finaat'privato harbor"
Yacht Brokors o Marino Inauraneo I'
February 27, 1970
Mrs . Doreen Marshall
of• New
City port Beach
(-
3300 Newport Boulevard
i Newport Beach, California
, r
f ' - Honorable Mayor Marshall:
{ We would like to again register our concern
' over the proposed Irvine development north of
' our property. ;
We feel we would be greatly harmed by this
development in that we would be at the dead ff
f end of a little traveled street. The Basin
property certainly would be less valuable by
the proposed change in the street passing us .
We also wonder how this lagoon can be kept ' " ''+ `
clean with only a 100 foot channel to the bay. �;:' •
' . We have
problems with' our Basin in this res-
pect and we have approximately 600 feet opening
to the bay. ;';,•.,. ,'.
We sincerely hope that we will not be strangled
by this proposed' development. But if it must
happen, could we at this time ask for some ' '•'' ' `
consideration? Could we be assured that we
" could erect a sign on the corner of the present
Ba side 'Drive and the Y proposed route which ;••r•
would direct people to us, and could we be
zr-IN
'w u....' n . • yi;,4}'::;f.'{a : '6: 0,r,•I. r
'
., },—' :• 1'::(.:. Yee.'..;';'
• .. ,. :{'• ;:i l'•'"°i1{�igryl�,r.', r•', ,r.t`L'. t:"jq rl ''">. • {{i;4••'U�••', ri .
r
r
r.
r
rr .. r
Mrs. Doreen Marshall 2-27-70
1
„protected some way such as requiring that �• ':., ;
excavated material be kept "Wet down", so
that we would not be covered with dirt while ;
the proposed work goes- on. :This would be
I particularly important to our shipyard `,• ' ,-
facility.
111
' Sincerely yours, i,,
BALBOA YACHT BASIN
f1 Carl H. Hage� ;r i v' .•
1 .,.,..
Manager
' CHH: 1' .. �.,., •1 .
'( ...... .. ---'••�.- - ..rT.__._.»-1^1...,'r:.:.�•,�^„ItnTTYV\:{{�,'1 ,.. �� ')i�op¢C'i y:.^ir-'''rit'I'I I•' ry lj PIT!
:,'. .1„ .o.. fir..,i••1;1,•�1f1�., Q rq�•:;r:.,4•,'j,111f;S ;it,i ; .
"• .._.._ .,.. �,•q.q ,n+i'rt"� .6.:41 i I'tr �.r 4: ,'i'�
�i• •�: l': .n:�(;1;r:r;�r�P::�,.i'I:' .��"�'i,.• d":'.�� :I r: ...r r
:.7anua^y 12,• •19%0 I
Mrs. ' Doreen Marshall '
City of Nowport Leach
3300 Newport Boulccard
Nowport Leach, California'
Honorably Mayor Marshall:
We are very much co• cernod and opposed to the proposed .
Irvine •Canpany developement north of our property f,03 '
the following reasons:
We would. find ourselves at the end of a hard to
'. find dead and strcct with little traffic and .
exposure which we certainly need to survive. We
think' our whole operation would be affected, and ' '
our. Yach•t brokerage :ia particular.
C We would be in the sane unfortunate situation that.
the.-gas station owner would be in when the State
changed the high*Dray passim his place of bus:iness•.
NO
Also, would not •she value of the Basin propertv,: '
which the City owns. be substantially reduced by.
: " isolating it as this proposal wouid?,
'It is hard for us to understand how a Citwr'Goves ;i—
: j
M, nt could destroy a public sthet for the sole y
benefit of the Irvine Company and at the etipense
of ourselves as well as the restaurant, hardware
store and shipyard on the Basin property. •
.o ' Sincerely hours,
BALBOA YACHT BAS 12Y,
Carl H. Hage, ;Manager
CE-U! i ,
3• , •:c..c." Newport Beich •Planning Commission' ..
• 829 3a.ys ire Drive...
Newport Beach, Calii
aanuary 12, "1970 ,
.. - M5: . ' %reen Marshall :
City of Ho.}*Wort, Beaci?
3300 1:4e ort Boulevard `
Wc,,rport' Beach, California ' P 71,
Hox pruale Mayor H •rsnall:
My wife and T operate the Galley Cafe on` 'the '
o 'Balboa Yacht Basin Qoperty-
1rhe p 4oposid Irvine Company devolope`i1C-nt, which -
would leave us a-, 'she end o2 a dead end street '
with little 'ral iC, would,Aurely be 'disasterov, , •
top US
fe' Lill 'anpfaciai your conside""ion.
a s'. .Sirsccrely,yours w
. %dward%E. S lacl ; c
C.C. 11G'''i4p0:f.L 'JBOach ilc'T.iating Co missic, lCi I`t" '
��'•
OF
•,'' - ✓'\' 'i.'i7i'Ji'i Ti i�i.":nisi: •�7r' '7
ALLAN SEEK
January 122 Mj70',
Planning Commission libv Promontory Point'
City of Nowport Beach
3300 Newport 13
Ioulovard • ' j
Newport Beach; California 92660 , • .
Gentlemen: 1
As a neig!YDor df the subject development, I •wish to endorse
it. I feel it will be an asset to the • coinmunity-and to my neigh-,
borhood.- There are some polnbs to which 'I think you should -give
attention in granting. 'approval, however: , •
1. Dred ing the -entrance channel will remove 100 linear feet !
of public beach on the north side of• the Balboa Island 'Channel, !
and some comlensation should be made, such as dedicating the
Promontory Lagoon as a •public waterway, and asking. the Corps -of
Engineers to run their harbor lines into the lagoon. I admit that, . - I
the 100 feet. of beach to- ,be destroyed are not at present in a Y. i
condition to be used or enjoyed by the public, bUu the practice
of letting nrivated developers dredge away public beaches at vrill.
has resulted in the loss of nearly a mile of public beaches •in
i\rewpor� Harbor (notably on the 'south and west sides of Linda Isle)
and it' is time for the City to. start requiring compensation.
i
2. The permit which 'has been requested includes 'the' blufftop
- ( "Promontory Point" propor.•) One of the most insistent desires of
the Newport Tomorrow Townscape Committee ,was• that all future. bluff-.
top developments provide for a view drive, somewhat ' similar to
Cliff Drive in Corona del Nlar. Since no specific plans f or''bluff-
top development are shown .on the permit, it may be premature to
ruse this point,: but• the -City should be assured that a height
limit of. !L5 feet above mean lovrer low water will be imposed on all. `•'' ;-•
building in the proposed 'nigh-density area below the top of :the
bluff. Otherwise the question- of a view drive might become academia
. because the -view had all' been obscured, ' If possible, a similar.
limit should be 'placed .on trees and 'other' planting along the bluff.' '
3. 'The existing Baysid.e Drive has oeen designated as part of ,.• .,. '. . ' '
.the bicycle path network. . Care should be taken that- the new Bay -"'•
side Drive is sager and more appropriate for this..'use than the ,
existing one, :which is really quite •dangerous . .'.i.trus•t that, the' 1
strip 8 -feet wide along the north side of the new Bayside••Drive
will be a bicycle"path.•
�,. ,-Vary• truly yours,
A11ai` Beek• 28 Bea on 3�
c ay:, .
Newport Bee ch•. •' ' California, 92002
. tihJ "iii;i; Jc•'liJilQr G•'Iiti::Ctl �:j. ♦;• ]'i n?"ti:'i'n 0
1 aG`U by {i'i G` loc^..i. . 52 o3f3- 'i;i r, 3.1c, .i f' t;
:'lily t: wink. fol' £. nov, l.01on a c,d,:i•'i;'iovnl i)oAtslip",
and housing is ! „o 0 Prot '•71t(id 'i;o• your ody this • '
i' nno citizon, 'aJn l.i,Cl' .1.:Lt3. 'I;o (:;. �'" ,.:.� ..i�.'.'o t .
.. an being opposed 1, making g u .'ar .. � ^^ •'4,"•' .
�� -C El't:�i:i� O ..P G;::i.S'::. .ira, i).,y . 7.n'GC.L•i
• .• .. ,� ' 1Z1M tii'?g"iion Arbor, 1 :t'o til izo iSl)•r'i; ,, ::'."l j „11C'h
'Cl.^> Elio •�a•2'vine'� can t)7.'Ci;'i♦y i•TL' I1 •l.`G i•T'.`�.i; ('i.J.:'9C;:.� 4T2 ,
it viould l:il:o -Tov Doxot ,to n;°ola ;S .Ice% iU ':i i ;;i' ).,i•�r;C>�
' • �,;Lll:;;)•c; lando:'Tnor within o'Clr.Ool;.ild:7.;"_ICC,
. . - . _ I
. •:� 'lgf;CV•Jl'� 0y C8.'i7. f;0i; Ei19iZ;�li %1C7t.C;?.Tl? 'C?"I ^�ilC•
• ^♦11d _l-,oOpel,tyy :'elCi, ti -'ol)^,)ly '•Till,
c? i'J:i,';;i?01,1i; •'d?:'Gn�j!.;.1��. �
. .an ':;hcv 7.:t1lC:i; I t• -a ,ld i:h loot ' l , ;,•,:-
oonle ol" our .in i•Lina.l contours .rowain s t-.1,:ic', '.y
] led Y�;,, .',
n6 rno:'.18 Can sucil. .'-1 _>].'1 be ' Ca 1(jO T' C;:ti.ycC ir. ,
niy haoiL
I : £11v You !'or eou CTi;i•ehtl OiI lii :i.g^•. 'iu i; ;G ?g. • =iC't `
• ha,)p '.k'res :lily^, (�1.'ti' n l C..._•.
.," ;il', law 1".111st ^1:d. will anjoew 1 7.'E.'11A the huW-,f.-r
s
.a'!� • .• " o1 iYl'�1CZC: atts Yoh:MOVE fa -o.a roem ,,r, .'a`.ac. Uou hats. .
,•. : . . . '�• ..i 7.Cot d"r, l'.,y 9
o (:i . , Ch, lv:
L51'
J. '.
1 '1
Crab
Comer IsFand
. ..,�% ..GCS•L�c�-/�G�',''a-��c.JG2/o� �.rC/.3••" ,. ,
' ( GL+ :�GG'�L�'o'./�z?.�L. ✓L� i ci /j//✓-�
' t � . C"� �t/l � ' C/�i'G(/?GCS-(!l-�','+',•i'��.C,ry"•,.�L�`,.�.., iCi:.-%.G .
< �✓ /,' /G .c 1•-r-t: 1Ivim
6 � .
' ` .,^,;�J1n'/•` ,�.:`.'/"�i.(f''.-��v1'ixii'f�L',J/ 'C�'.�''✓Gl/ / .�Lt;.:Z _
��.• + ;� • ' ' . ' /�-�.,'',�•� ,'� '��� ,� "•L /�.�-r/' Te�;�t Cam. _. - .
�. ` rccE:rvr' a,' \i� .
w GG'cu`
,' �� :� . •:. �,� ' G.J.'-�,�.,li'✓' `G—.� ,
77
i
o
� l y�ltinY l
OAST'
SrAre
CNH k
•GAYS/OE ,F:r?}—"�!�w
VACHr
jJI"'_LB0 l .l AJ L1�SLVL i/j L� V1VlJL• p!9NC�O L/YL =_,�f�..�= '
t
REALIC7NMTNJT =, or 'bA/Si r-
r—
C-Koss . S�CT IONS -
=� t
z -
t t
�e-9 R - �l•7a°� � I•%opt _ Ya, e�� - -
_ E
_ t
V
- - - . • - - C�') '. - - ' � - � - - . • - .- -fib' .. - . . - • _
lit` 19— - a< 1
v`S
t O` _2` C�°
GFl U T
_/_1 C11-1t' _of _ .�'
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH --- PLANNING DEPARTMENT
T0 : Planning Commission
FROM; Plann-i,ng Department
SUBJECT: Master Plan -Amendment No. 25 - Item 5.
Use Permit Application No . 1466 - Item• 6
Tentative Map Tract No . • 3867 - Item _7
The attached report contains a description of- all the '
various aspects of the proposed Promontory Bay Project, '
which are presently before the Planning Commission ,
together with comments and recommendations as they have
been received.
Recommendations
r It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider
these matters in order - from. general to specific- Items
5 and 6 both require public hearings and involve- general ',
determinations ' to be forwarded to' the City Council . ' Item
7 involves the specific details of the development but does
not require a public hearing . These recommendations also:
are to be forwarded to the' City Council .
If the Planning Commission approves Item 5 and Item 6 ,- ,..
it would then be appropriate to examine the detailed
considerations involved in Item 7 . On the other hand , if
the Planning Commission does not make •a decision favorable
to the applicant on either Item 5 or Item 6 , there would
be no point in proceeding further.
The proposed Promontory Bay development is an exciting and
intriguing project. It offers opportunities to increase the
water area of Newport Bay and the length of shoreline , .and to
open up new windows to the bay. It is - also an extremely 'complex
project , with major -impact on surrounding areas of the City. -
Input will be received from a number of sources in addition to
the Planning Commission . All of the assembled information and
recommendations will be presented to the City Council for• final
decision.
-- '�'`� �"' •��"`""' February 5 197 0
SIG ATURE Laurence Wilson , DATE LW/kk
Planning Director f
� r
•
Planning Commission Meeting Feb . 5 , 1970
Items No . 50 6 & 7
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
February 5 , 1970
TO : Planning Commission
FROM : Planning Department
SUBJECT. Master Plan Amendment No. 25 ( Item 5 )
Proposal to amend Master Street and Highway Plan
by realigning Bayside Drive between East Coast
Highway and Jamboree Road (Marine Avenue) and also
to close a section of existing Bayside Drive west-
erly of Jamboree Road (Marine Avenue ) .
Use Permit Application No . 1466 ( Item 6 )
Request to permit development of a residential
area of single family and multiple dwelling units ,
with supporting commercial and recreational facili -
ties , to include a yacht basin and marina.
Tentative Map Tract No . 3867 ( Item 7)
Request to permit subdivision of 24 . 0± acres into
62 residential lots , and Lot "A" reserved for
waterway purposes , Lot "B" reserved for planted
area , Lot "C" reserved for common waterway access
area , Lot "D" reserved for parking and marina
facility , Lot "E" reserved for park site and
Lot 63 reserved for commercial site .
LOCATION : Portion of Block 94 of Irvine ' s Subdivision located
between Pacific Coast Highway and Bayside Drive ,
west of Jamboree Road (Promontory Point and proposed
Promontory Bay) .
ZONE : Unclassified , C-N-H and R-3
APPLICANT: The Irvine Company , Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
Application
Bayside Drive is designated as a secondary highway on the Master
Street and Highway Plan and , therefore; the proposed realignment
of Bayside Drive requires an amendment to the master plan in
accordance with Section 19 . 20 . 010 of the Municipal Code .
TO: Planning Commission - 2 .
The proposed development is located in an unclassified "U"
district and , therefore , requires a use permit in accordance
with Section 20 . 34 . 020 of the Municipal Code .
Section 19 . 12, 101 of the Municipal Code requires the filing of
a tentative map as the first step in subdivision of the land
into separate building lots for sale or lease .
Background
Use Permit No . 1466 was continued from the meeting of January 15 ,
1970 , at the request of Staff and the Irvine Company so that all
three items which require Planning Commission action regarding
this proposal could be brought before the Commission concurrently .
Staff has consolidated the reports for these items .
Subject Property
The subject property includes Phase I of the proposed development
consisting of Parcels 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , and 9 as shown on the proposed
Land Use Plan for Use Permit No . 1466 , as submitted by the Irvine
Company. Phase II of the proposed development would be the subject
of a separate use permit application in the future . This phase
would include Parcels 5 , 6 , 7 and 8 , which are shown for informa-
tion only. These parcels lie north of the proposed realignment
of Bayside Drive, and comprise the existing Bayside Shopping Center ,
a limited expansion of this center to the west , and an apartment
development of all the high ground known as Promontory Point as
well as a small area of land at a lower elevation bordering Bayside
Drive.
The legal description filed with the application for Use Permit
No. 1466 includes all of the land in both Phase I and Phase II .
However, Phase I is the only portion for which specific informa-
tion has been submitted .
The existing and proposed uses and existing zoning of the parcels
comprising Phase I are approximately as follow:
Zoning Existing Use Proposed Use
Parcel #1 -U- Vacant Lagoon
R-3 Boat Repair Channel
Facility
Parcel #2 -U- Vacant Marina Facility
and Parking
Parcel #3 R-3 Yacht Club Marina Related
Commercial
TO : Planning Commission - 3 .
Zoning Lxisting Use Proposed Use
Parcel #4 R-3 Vacant and Commercial
Public Right-
of=Way
Parcel #9 -U- Vacant Single Family
Residential
Surrounding Uses
The following properties surround the proposed development and are
affected by the realignment of Bayside Drive :
1 . Balboa Yacht Basin ( land leased from City of Newport
Beach ) . City Manager' s office is investigating
the possibility of retaining an appraiser to study
the effect which realignment of Bayside Drive
would have on this property.
2 . Beacon Bay ( land leased from City of Newport Beach ) .
This property would also be included in the ap-
praiser' s study . However, the Staff feels that
due to the reduction of traffic on existing Bay-
side Drive (which could permit use of the rear
access to Beacon Bay ) , the Beacon Bay residential
property would benefit.
3. Residences adjacent to Harbor Isle Drive .
At present these residences front on a very busy
street with potentially dangerous problems of
driveway access . Staff feels the reduction in
traffic resulting from the realignment of Bayside
Drive would benefit these homes and decrease
the traffic hazards .
4. Bayside Shopping Center. The proposed realignment
of Bayside Drive would cut through the southwest
corner of the parking lot which would necessi -
tate redesigning a portion of the driveway access
and parking layout . The driveway connection shown
on the Tentative Map would require .further study.
5 . Apartments along south side of Bayside Drive be-
tween Villa Marina Motel and Shark Island Yacht
Club . These apartments now have direct frontage
on Bayside Drive but would not have direct frontage
on the proposed realignment . Further study of
access would be necessary.
TO : Planning Commission - 4 .
Statistical Analysis
Estimated Estimated
Parcel Proposed Population Total
No. Use Acres D/U per D/U Population
1 Lagoon
and 11 . 0
Marina
2 Marina
Facilities 2 . 1
3 Marina
Related . 4
Commercial
4 Commercial 1 . 2
9 Single
Family 11 . 5 62 3 186
TOTAL 26. 2 62 3 186
Development Characteristics
RESIDENTIAL (Lots 1 -62 ) - The Tentative Map proposes 62 single
family residential lots surrounding the greater part of the pro-
posed lagoon . The Tentative Map includes a typical cross section
showing the proposed lagoon and the relationship of lots and
streets on both sides . Other drawings on the Tentative Map show
typical building sites and street sections . Single family resi -
dential lots have the following characteristics :
A. Size and Shape . The proposed development is in
conformity with the minimum requirements of
Section 19 . 20 . 110 of the Municipal Code regarding
area (not less than 5000 sq . ft. average) , width
(not less than 50 ft. average ) , and depth (not
less than 80 ft . average) .
B. Access . Access to lots adjacent to the proposed
realignment of Bayside Drive would utilize drive-
ways located on common lot lines with turnaround
areas so that vehicles would not necessarily be
required to back into the street . The Planning
Commission recently approved this concept of
driveway design for another Irvine Company devel -
opment of 12 lots along Bayside Drive near El Paseo
Drive. Access to lots adjacent to existing Bayside
Drive is provided by conventional driveways . How-
ever , Lots 29 through 34 and 42-44 , due to their
location at intersections and on the curvature of
the road , have limited sight distances . The turn-
around driveway concept properly could also apply
to these lots .
TO : Planning Commission - 5.
C. Setbacks . Setbacks are as 'follow:
1 . Rear Yard - 10 ' Minimum
2 . Side Yard - 4 ' Minimum
3 , Front Yard - 10 ' Min . -Realigned Bayside Drive
17 ' Min . -Existing Bayside Drive
Staff recommends that the front yard setback on existing
Bayside Drive should be 20 feet minimum in the drive-
way area to prevent blocking of the public sidewalk
and right-of-way.
C. Grading . Lots 46 through 62 are split-level with
approximately 9 ' difference in pad elevations . A
retaining wall separates a portion of Lot 45 from
Lot 46 .
WATERWAY ( LOT "A" ) - The entry channel to the proposed lagoon is
proposed to be cut through property owned by the Irvine Company ,
now occupied by Basin Marine Incorporated and a portion of the
Shark Island Yacht Club. The channel location would be immediately
adjacent to City-owned property occupied by the Balboa Yacht Basin .
The Irvine Company has applied to the Army Corps of Engineers for
the necessary navigation permit . The Corps as part of the proces-
sing of the permit will make water quality and hydraulic determina-
tions as well as coordinate with other agencies such as the Depart-
ment of Interior , State Fish and Game , and the Regional Water
Quality Control Board . Approximately thirty days are required
for the Corps to process a navigation permit , at which time the
results will be included in the application for a harbor permit .
The City Council has asked the Staff to prepare a study on the
question of private vs . public waterway for the lagoon proposal .
This topic will be discussed at the joint Harbor Committee Meet-
ing on February 10 , 1970 , and will also be a consideration in
the application for a harbor permit. One of the questions for
Planning Commission consideration regarding the lagoon is the
general concept of adding additional waterways to the existing
harbor.
LOT "B" (Planted Area ) - This is a planting area that forms
part of the intersection between the proposed realignment of
Bayside Drive and the existing Bayside Drive. (Note : A new
name would be necessary for the portion of existing Bayside Drive
which would no longer be part of the through route . One name
which has been suggested is Harbor Isle Drive . ) Staff is of the
opinion that the proposed intersection would function satis-
factorily; however , the connecting street should be 52 feet in
width between exterior curbs in order to provide for a 20 foot
entering roadway , an 8 foot median , and a 24 foot exiting road-
way .
•
TO: Planning Commission - 6 .
" " - e access area and beach for
LOT C This � s a common waterway
Lots 42 through 45 .
LOT "D" (Marina Facilities and Parking ) - Lot "D" is located
adjacent to the proposed realignment of Bayside Drive and is an
adjunct to the marina, providing space for parking and rest room
facilities . The parking lot , 17-slip marina and dry boat storage
facility provide a window-to-the-bay approximately 800 feet in
length .
Parking requirements for the marina and small boat dry storage
include:
17 slips @ . 75 space per boat slip = 13
40 storage spaces @ . 25 space per dry storage spaces = 13
Total Required Spaces 26
The proposed parking area presently shows 18 parking spaces .
Redesign would be necessary to provide 8 additional parking
spaces , or reduce the number of slips and/or dry boat
storage spaces .
This portion of the project offers an opportunity to create a truly
outstanding relationship between water, docks , roadway , pedestrian
ways , and the development inland from Bayside Drive . Maximum advan-
tage should be obtained from the differences in elevation and the
area should be thoughtfully designed to provide for landscaping ,
benches , etc .
LOT "E" ( Park Site) - Lot "E" is located adjacent to the west side
of the proposed waterway at the point where existing Bayside Drive
would be closed and terminated in a cul -de-sac. The Tentative Map
shows the cul -de-sac centered on Bayside Drive and overlapping onto
City property at the Balboa Marina ; this could raise certain prob-
lems . However, it is important that the turning area be fully
adequate for larger vehicles, in view of the length of the cul -de-
sac , and possible use of the road by large vehicles , trailers
transporting boats , etc.
The park site would be an additional asset to the community , pro-
viding a window-to-the-bay with possibilities for adjacent parking .
The portion of Lot "E" not included in the public right-of-way,
resulting from the closing of Bayside Drive , should be dedicated
to the City , and the existing right-of-way of Bayside Drive should
be retained under public control .
LOT 63 ( Commercial Site) - One proposal for this site is a
restaurant to be located on that portion north of the present
right-of-way of Bayside Drive . Further information and study
would be necessary concerning the relationship between Lot 63
and Parcel No . 3 as shown on the proposed land use plan , as well
as the previously mentioned apartment complex .
TO : Planning Commission - 7 .
PARCEL 3 , AS SHOWN ON PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN FOR USE PERMIT 1466
( Commercial Site ) - The proposed channel would necessitate the
removal of the existing Shark Island Yacht Club . One proposal
for use of Parcel 3 would be to accommodate replacement facilities
for the yacht club . Further information and study is necessary
regarding this parcel .
UTILITIES - This project involves major questions of reconstruc-
tion and/or relocation of existing utilities to avoid conflict
with the proposed channel crossing . The largest single question
involves rerouting of the existing 21 " trunk sewer line of Orange
County Sanitation District No . 5 which serves Balboa Island and
Irvine Terrace as well as a large part of Corona del Mar. One of
the alternative plans now under consideration for serving the future
requirements of Sanitation District No . 5 would involve expansion
of this sewer to 39" diameter. The questions involving utility
relocation have been identified and are under study by the Irvine
Company, the public and private utility agencies involved , and the
City Public Works Department.
STREET STANDARDS - Comments from the City Engineer are contained
in the attached memorandum dated January 28 , 1970 . Standards shown
on the Tentative Map for existing Bayside Drive appear to be satis-
factory , with the exception of questions concerning the cul -de-sac
at the east end , and the intersection between existing Bayside
Drive and the proposed relocation of Bayside Drive .
The alignment shown on the Tentative Map appears to be satisfactory ,
except that a length of tangent should be provided between the two
reversing curves at the east end of the development adjacent to
the existing Bayside Shopping Center.
Consideration has been given to designing the relocated Bayside
Drive to intersect Pacific Coast Highway east of the Iverson Volks-
wagen Agency rather than west of the Bayside Inn . Information has
been received from the California Division of Highways indicating
that such a connection would be feasible so far as design of the
Pacific Coast Freeway is concerned ; however, a freeway crossing of
Bayside Drive east of the Volkswagen Agency would not be compatible
with a freeway grade separation serving a north entrance to Promon-
tory Point, west of Jamboree Road. Such a relocation of Bayside
Drive might offer opportunities for increasing the available land
area adjacent to the upper end of proposed Promontory Bay and sim-
plifying intersection design . The advantages and disadvantages of
any such relocation are under study. Any of these proposed relo-
cations of Bayside Drive offer opportunities for shortening the
length of the main thoroughfare , improving alignment and reducing
traffic past single family homes along the west side of existing
Bayside Drive .
The attached drawings illustrate three possible typical sections
for the relocation of Bayside Drive . Alternate A is the proposal
of the Irvine Company as shown on the Tentative Map . Alternate B
TO: Planning Commission - 8.
has been proposed by the Public Works Department and is based on
four travel lanes , an optional left-turn median and parking along
the south side only . Alternate C has been proposed by the Plan-
ning Department and is based on a separate frontage road serving
single family dwellings and a four lane major street with no park-
ing on either side and a variable median allowing left turns only
at intersections .
Traffic studies have been presented by consultants for the Irvine
Company indicating a potential reduction in average daily traffic
on Bayside Drive to 6 ,500 vehicles from th•e present flow of 13 ,000
to 16 ,000 vehicles . This is based on anticipated diversion of
traffic following completion of the Pacific Coast Freeway.
L ENCE WILSON
Planning Director
LW/kk
Attachments
REALIONM� - MT Or 5A SIDE , DK Vr-
90563Lr- TYP.iCAL. C.KOSS SECT IONS
401
ICY
1 `- '
�rya 1.7a°� t•7o _ 9u v� _
a:a.a. 6� o �O 7- 62•:O - � ,
zo' $
14' 12` rz, i2, 12•
• _ i
- a •
A -
_ 'A
g [4` 12r (2' 14.E
t2 l 0 8 �' "
• 1
r_ry{I
THE IRVINE COMPANY .
NEWPORT FINANCIAL PLAZA•550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE•NEWPORT BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92660•(714)644.3011
January 14, 1970
Planning Commission
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California
Gent lemen:
I
PROMONTORY POINT
As a result of recent discussions with the Newport Beach .
City Council and the city staff regarding procedures for
the processing of our application for Promontory Point,
The Irvine Company would respectfully request that action '
on Use Permit Application #1466 be continued until the—
Planning Commission meeting of February 5, 1970.
The staff, supported by the City Council, has proposed that "
all items regarding this complex proposal be brought .before
the Council at the same time for discussion and action.
This is to include such issues as the land use proposal,
tentative subdivision map, an amendment to the Master -Plan ,
of Arterials precipitated by the proposed relocation of
Bayside Drive, abandonment proceedings for portions of
existing Bayside Drive created by the proposed yacht basin
channel, the harbor permit required to dredge the yacht
lagoon, the proposal for future rezoning of the site, and
the results of a property assessment study to be 'conducted
on city-owned property adjacent to the proposed development ,
in Beacon Bay. In order to accomplish this goal, it will
be necessary for the Planning Commission to also hold
hearings and take action on many of the same items to be
forwarded to the City Council. Therefore, additional time
will be necessary for preparation of exhibits and nece sa
legal advertising for the appropriate •items . �r�--�=
City I
Nt :ruRr O
Z! cauF rnC tC3
+C, \ <�•.
Planning Commission 2. January 14, 1970
• I
It is anticipated that on February 5, The Irvine Company
will present a proposal to the Planning Commission which ;
will include the following: (a) Use Permit #1466, con-
taining land use proposals for Promontory Point; (b) an
amendment to• the Master Plan of Arterial Highways proposing
the relocation of Bayside Drive and; (c) a ,tentative map
outlining the specific proposals for development of the
single family lots, yacht basin, commercial marina, and JI
supporting commercial facilities for Phase 1 of the
development.
The city planning staff can provide you with more specific
information relative to the procedures decided upon and the
sequence and timing of action to be taken relative to the .
project. Your cooperation 'in this request is greatly ,
appreciated.
Very truly yours,
James E_ Taylor
General Planning Administrator
eb
f { THE JRVINE COMPANY
NEWPORT FINANCIAL PLAZA•550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE a NEWPORT BEACH,.CALIFORNIA 92660 a(714)644.3011
December 22, 1969
c�
ns,c- tvED
o CLit:L;cJ DST.
Planning Commission . DECN 'u
City of Newport Beach 5_ �
3300 Newport Boulevard c)rr OF 1c
wEWraTr eJICN�
Newport Beach,. California crt;x.
Gentlemen:
PROMONTORY POINT
Submitted herewith is the development plan bf The Irvine
' Company for the property commonly referred to as Promontory
Point. The plan proposes a homogenous community of single
family lots for the construction of custom homes, multiple
family residences and supporting commercial facilities ,
which are oriented toward a yacht basin and lagoon'.
The project is divided into two (2) phases . Phase I, which
constitutes the basis of the present Use Permit application,
is comprised of sixty-two (62) single family lots,,, a ten (10)
acre lagoon with access to Newport Bay, a commercial marina
with ancillary facilities, and two (2 commercial sites
totalling approximately two -(2) acres .
It is anticipated that construction of the thirty (30)'
acre Phase I will commence in the early part of 1970. The
remaining thirty-two . (32) acres containing medium high,
density residential units and an approximate two' (2) acre
commercial site would be developed at a later date and' be
subject to the approval of an additional Use Permit which
will provide specific information relative to densities,
circulation and performance standards'. It is proposed
that Bayside Drive be realigned to accommodate the lagoon.
Therefore, it is 'requested that the City of Newport Beach .
initiate vacation proceedings for that 'portion of existing '
Bayside Drive that will be eliminated by the access channel
and realignment of said street..
I , I
n ' ~ Y �•
Promontory Point• 2. December 22, 1969
It is the intent of The Irvine Company to initiate legis-
lative proceedings in order to zone the subject area in .
accordance with actual land uses subsequent to approval
of the Use Permit for Phase I. Further, the following'
documents are included. as a part of the application in
order to provide the Commission with sufficient informa-
tion- upon which to base its deliberations :
1., Legal Plat Map.
2. Topographic Map of Existing Conditions .
3. Site Plan for Phase I.
4. Statistical Analysis for Phase I. ,
5 . Precise Land, Use Plan for Promontory Point. . '
Your consideration in• this matter is greatly appreciated.
Further, a representative of The Irvine Company will. be
present at the public .hearing to amswer any questions you
may have.
Very truly yours,
""gym
James B. Taylor
General Planning Administrator
Enc.
eb
STATISTICAL, ANALYSIS
, PROMONTORY BAY PHASE I
RESIDENTIAL
Type Area Acres DU/Ac. DU Per/DU Population -
Single Family 9 • 11.5 1 62 . 3 ' ;, • _ : , 186
Sub Total - 11.5 186
SUPPORT FACILITIES. _
Type
Commercial 2 2 .1
3 .4 ;
r 4 - 1.2
Lagoon and
Marina 1 11.0
Sub Total 847 �'£
Grand Total = ��, . " 18�
1
January 28, 1970
TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FROM: Public Works Department.
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 3867, PROMONTORY BAY
REOMMENDATIONS:
1 . That final approval of the subdivision be subject to approval
of an approprate revision to the Master Plan of Streets and
Highways. (Public hearings required) i
2. That final approval of the subdivision be subject to the
abandonment of certain exi'sting public rights of way as
contemplated, and to satisfactory arrangements being made i
for dedication and improvement of the new rights of way I
required. (Public hearing'required)
i
3. That final approval of the subdivision be subject to satisfactory
demonstration of the engineering feasibility of the proposed
lagoon design, and issuance of a harbor permit.
' 4. That final approval of the subdivision be subject to satisfactory
arrangements being made to relocate existing facilities of the
Orange County Sanitation District^ and of other affected utilities.
5. That the design of the new intersections of realigned Bayside
Drive with existing Bayside Drive be subject to review and,
approval by the City:
6. That, unless a frontage road is provided, access to the single
family parcels along realigned Bayside Drive be provided
by means of drives located on common lot lines, each drive
serving two parcels; and that~: adequate turn-around areas be
provided so- that vehicles need not back into the street.
Cross easements or non-barrier agreements satisfactory to the
City Attorney shall be provided so as to guarantee perpetuation
of the access arrangement. .
7. That, unless a frontage road is provided, the right of way
width of realigned. Bayside Drive be at least 86 feet and the-
curb to curb width be at least 70 feet. This cross-section -
will provide for 4 travel lanes , 2-8 foot wide parkways ,
a 12 foot wide median left turning lane, and an 8 foot wide
parking lane on the southerly side.
8. That the new cul-de-sac be located entirely on the developer's
land.
9. That there be no City financial &1-1,gations connected with
' accomplishment of the development. j
•
Page 2
Subject: Tentative Tract 3867
January 28, 1970
10. That all improvements be constructed as required by ordinance I
and the Public Works Department.
11 . That the boundary of the final tract map be checked by the
County Surveyor before being submitted to the City for approval .
12. That all grading be in accordance with grading plans and reports
approved by the Public Works Director and a qualified Soils
Engineer. Upon completion of the grading the Civil Engineer
and the Soils Engineer shall certify that the grading has been 11
completed in accordance with the plans, the soils report, and
the grading ordinance. Reproducible copies of the plans on
standard size sheets shall be furnished to the Public Works
Department.
r
13. That the connecting street southeasterly of Lot B be 52 feet
in width between exterior curbs in order-to- provide for a 20- i
foot entering roadway, an 8-foot median, and a 24-foot exiting
roadway.'
Y COMMENTS:
1 . It is suggested that the City Manager's office be requested to
comment on the effect of the proposal on the City-owned property
affected.
2. .'The desirability of making the waterway area public should be "
investigated. The developer proposes a private waterway.
Benjamin B. Nolan
City Engineer
BBN/em
January 6,, .1970
�r
TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FROM: Public Works Department
SUBJECT: USE PERMIT NO. 1466, PROMONTORY BAY
- r .Ts:C�
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1 . That final • approval of the Use Permit be subject to approval
of an appropriate revision to the Master Plan of Streets and
Highways, after the. required public hearings.
2, That final • approval of the Use Permit be subject to the abandonment
of certain existing public rights of way as contemplated, and to
satisfactory arrangements being made for dedication and improve-
ment of the new rights of way required.
3, That final approval of the Use Permit be subject to satisfactory
demonstration of the engineering feasibility of the proposed
lagoon design, and issuance of a harbor permit. (For additional
detail see separate report from the Harbor and Tidelands
Administrator. )
4, That final approval of the Use Permit be subject to satisfactory
arrangements being made to relocate existing facilities of the i
Orange County Sanitation District and of other affected utilities.
5. That the design of the new intersections of realigned Bayside
Drive with existing Bayside Drive be subject'to review and approval j
'by the City.
UN(c55 Feo SAG R0,3D,!S RWVZ1P151Py "
6. That.,naccess to the single family parcels along realigned Bayside
Drive be provided by means of drives located on common lot' lines ,
each drive serving two parcels; and that adequate turn-around
areas be provided so that vehicles need not back into the street,.
Cross easements or recorded non-barrier agreements satisfactory '
to the City Attorney shall be provided so as to guarantee
perpetuation of the access arrangement. "
7. That, unless a frontage road is provided, the right of way
width of realigned Bayside Drive be at least 86 feet and the
curb to curb width be at least 70 feet. This cross-section
will provide for 4• travel lanes,, 2 - 8 foot wide parkways;
a 12 foot wide median left turning lane, and an 8 foot wide,
shoulder on the southerly side.
NOTE TO PLANNING DIRECTOR:
It is suggested that the City Manager's office be -requested to:
comment on the effect of the proposal on the City-owned property
affe5tV
Benjamin B. Nolan -
City Engineer
BBN/1dg
T. 1
ORAINGE COW,- ' HARB DISTRICT
` K ENNETN SAMPSON
HARBOR COMMISSION 14
NA lot DIRECTOR HARdOPa, OCACH EO 8 PARKS
C. C. (JACK)WOOLLCY, CHAIRMAN Ne
W. ALLEN BRU➢O. VICE.CHAINMAN � � �•� 190( BAY510E DRIVE
FRANK F.MEAO +i• rv� NEWPORT BEACH. CALIF. 92002
DEAR B.SHULL, JR. �6 \lilt Mltl -
R09ERT K.HENOON °4p 01 TELEPHONE (714) 034•3000
� I
January 14, 1970
Mr. George M. Dawes
Harbor and Tidelands Administrator
City of Newport Beach
City Hall , 3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92660
Dear Mr. Dawes:
By letter, dated December 29, 1969, you requested that this office review
The Irvine Company's marina development proposal for the area commonly
referred to as Promontory Point. The Distrllct's reply, as regards to the
specific inquiries in your letter, is as follows:
a. The Irvine Company's- proposal , in our opinion, will affect the
use of Newport Harbor and, therefore, should be presented to
the Joint Harbor Committee.
I.
b. Additional data is not desired at the present time. However,
upon submittal of the proposal to the Joint Harbor Committee, it
may be necessary t6 request information regarding possible effects
on water quality, water circulation, and erosion of the public
beach area across from the entrance channel .,
c. Special conditions that may be desirable to incorporate into any
approvals should- i'nclude the following:
(1 ) Responsibility for maintenance of basin project depths.
(2) Establishment of -pier permit areas for indivi.dual• lots.
(3) Dedication of water areas to- public agency for enforcement.
d. The possible effect of the development on the. 1tems you mentioned
cannot be' determined without a detailed study. (See reply to Item B
above) .
Should you desire to discuss this matter in detail ; it is suggested that you
contact the District's Development Engineer, Mr. R. Wingard, 834-3814.
Yours very truly,
KENNETN SAMPSON, Direct of
KS:RFW:mph Harbors,, Beaches and, Parks,`
I
Ilk
• f/ wY '•
f„`, `•'• DEPARTMENT OF THE AF2@v7V
LOS ANGELES DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS '+
P. O. BOX 27f 2
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA SOOMS
IN REPLY REFER TO +
SPLED-E 22 January 1970
- Mr. George M. Dawes
�.
Harbor & Tidelands Administrator , • I
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard. I
Newport Beach, California 92660
1 i
Dear Mr. Dawes:
A copy of the proposal to alter a portion of lower Newport Harbor, ,
as outlined in your submission to Mr. Herron of this office,' has (I
{ been reviewed by the Coastal Engineering and Operations Branch. i
j Mr. Herron discussed.our preliminary findings with you in a {
telephone conversation on 15 January 1970. !
A detailed review will be given this proposal when your formal �{
i request for a navigation permit is made. Our initial reaction is
as follows:
a. Tidal exchange of waters in the newly created bay should 1
jj be studied to determine possible pollution effects. �I
I
ii b. The effect of ebb tide currents from the proposed new
1 entrance should be studied to avoid any adverse erosion and/or
shoaling effects on the banks of the existing channel.
c. It does not appear desirable to extend harbor lines into
the proposed basin.
I
d. A navigation permit will be required to connect the pro-
posed basin and entrance -channel to the existing navigation channel.
At least 30 days should be allowed to process this permit request.
I if you desire further information on the proposal, please do not, -
1 hesitate to call on us.
Sincerely ours,
i,
-- Z__
S. J 11
CE I
U. District Engineer i
' I 1
I'_^^ __...._ .` _ _ Il•�: ,.i�r,�h , ,y,','r.y,•'.:;1,�Sy'�'•�'^~�-,�^� �'�i"r 'P' 1I. , P
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKS, BEACHES RECREATION DEPARTMENT
February 4; 1970.,
I
TO.- LARRY WILSON, PLANNING DIRECTOR
FROM: PB $ R Director
SUBJECT: TRACT MAP #3867 (PROMONTORY BAY)
At its meeting of February 3, 1970, the Parks, Beaches $
Recreation Commission agreed unanimously that tentative Tract Map 1
#3867 be approved as submitted with the following stipulations:
(1) Street trees of a low, round-headed type,
i
be planted on both sides of Bayside Drive
- in accordance with PB & R Department
specifications.
(2) That Lot E be landscaped in such a way that
will not obstruct the view of motorists 'on'
Bayside Drive; that it be open for public
use for view purposes. I
CALVIN C STESUART
CCS:h
r
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKS, BEACHES & RECREATION camisSION•' ;
January 9, 1970' . .•
TO: . PLANNING COMHISSION , n
FROM: ' PB R Commission
SUBJECT: USE PERMIT #1466 (PROMONTORY POINT)
Irvine Comoany plans ,for the development of Promontory Point and
the contiguous land 'area adjacent to Bayside Drive through Use Permit #1466,, '
were reviewed at the PB & R Commission meeting of January 6th.
PB $ R Commission considers this area to be one of the most signifi
;; r rant in Newport Beach as far as land use, windows to the Bay and public access
are conce3ned. It is with this thought in mind that this Commission hopes that
the Planning Commission will not act too hastily in approval of development plans.,--.,,
After t.
review, the •PB $ R Commission approved,in concept of the land
use and felt that the development as projected would be an. asset to the common-;' ;
ity. However, once again additional people are being brought into the' City, '
through a residential development, with no public park or recreational' facili-' , ';.:'' , .'
ties being provided.
t Since this is such a strategic location, the PB $ R Commission has t •• ""
instructed its Liaison Committee with the Planning Commission to meet in the-,
immediate future to discuss this development. . It would be desirable if such• ...
a meeting were to take place prior to.Planning Commission's action on the
Irvine Company proposals. ,:
Items that should be considered 'in this liaison meeting' would'•be
park sites and use, public recreational,-areas,. vista'points and access to the
Bay' 1 + ;
Your considerations to the M.$, R Commission 'concerns`'wih;,be. very. ,-
much appreciated
l.V;
A:C. :CAMERON,'JR. Chairman
, Parks, Beaches $ Recreation Commission
1 _ ;
.Arc ' . . . ,; •..., „ •, . . , e,
•CJ A' I••4 , i .e
ACC:CCS':h' '11
+ , r
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT ;y .tI :.
December. 26, 1969
TO: LARRY WILSON, PLANNING DIRECTOR
' 1, ~�•• r .. _',gyp
FROM: PB $ R Director ;
SUBJECT: USE PERMIT NO. 1466
Larry, I have reviewed the proposals and plans of the Irvine , j
Company for the development of sixty acres of land northerly of Bayside !
Drive and southerly of the Pacific Coast Highway in the area of Jamboree I
Road. It seems to me that this is a very .strategic location in the City
and would bear quite a'bit of attention.before any approvals for develop-
ment were considered,
This is the area, as you know, that we are quite emphatic that
a view area be provided on the bluff just southerly of Pacific Coast
Highway. Whether this is done by a perimeter node, a view park, or
periodic turnouts on the bluff is not too important, just so long as
one of the methods is provided. Landscaping and beautification will
also 'be' very significant in this 60 acre development, and.parkway trees.
are -going to have to be ineticulously selected.
The PB $ R Department will go on record on the following points:
1. That a view area be provided for the general public on
• the bluff area overlooking the bay.
2. Parlaaay trees be installed on all public right of ways.
in accordance with PB & R Department specifications.
3. Appropriate landscaping be installed on all slopes and
vacant open spaces resulting from this development.
Larry, since this area has been under such great consideration by the
Newport Tomorrow groups, as well as other interested organizations, I at sure
you will give it your utmost attention before any final approvals are given.
YCALVINSTEWART
CCS:dm �(
I
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION
November 19, 1969
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ' PB & R Commission
SUBJECT: A WINDOW TO THE BAY AT JAMBOREE' ROAD AND PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
Members of the PB & R Commission are appalled at the way in•
which windows to the Bay are rapidly disappearing because of new
development. Everyone is cognizant of this fact, and for the past
ten years, civic leaders have been proclaiming that we should take
action to preserve the few remaining windows to the Bay. However,•
even with this knowledge and concern, each year more of these strategic
windows are being closed.
i
,. With the activity that is going on at the intersection of
Pacific Coast Highway, Bayside Drive and Jamboree Road, it is apparent
that the Irvine Company has plans to develop that bluff area in the
near future.
The Commission wishes to go on record with the Council and the
Planning Commission that arhen plans are submitted for this area, a
scenic drive along the perimeter be utilized as a public window to the
Bay. This is such an important window to the Bay, it should be preserved.
A. C. CAMERON,. JR, Chairman
cc: Planning Commission
r
4 Yti t e� i
January 12, 1970
Mrs. Doreen Marshall
City of Newport Beacb
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California
Honorable Mayor Marshall:
We are very much concerned and opposed'to the proposed
Irvine Company developement north of our property for
the following reasons:
We would find ourselves at the end of a hard to
find dead end street with little traffic and
exposure which we certainly need to survive. We
think our whole operation would be affected, ' and
our Yacht brokerage in particular.
We would be in the same unfortunate situation that
the gas station owner would be in when the State
changed the highway passing his place of business. ' i
Also, would not the value of the Basin property,
which the City owns, be substantially, reduced by
isolating it as this proposal would?
It is hard for us to understand how a City Govern-
ment could destroy a public street for the sole
benefit of the Irvine Company and at the expense
of ourselves as well as the restaurant, hardware
store and shipyard on the Basin property. _ .
Sincerely yours, i
BAI.BOA YACHT BASIN,, INC.
Carl H. Hage, Manager - i
r
CHH: 1
c.c. Newport Beach Planning Commission
829 Bayside Drive
Newport Beach, Calif
January 12, 1970
Mrs.. Doreen Marshall
city' of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California
Honorable Mayor Marshall:
PTy wife and I operate the Galley Cafe on the
Balboa Yacht Basin property.
The proposed Irvine Company developement, which
would leave us at the end of a dead end street
with little traffic, would surely be disasterous
to us.
We will appreciate your consideration.
Sincerely yours,
Edward H. Vlach
EfIF:l ••
c.c. Newport Beach Plannang Con-aission
s,
VED
/). Ft�i+;ii•:3 DEPT. 9
CITY OF :J
-� NE7701T 01^cx, L�
s
Ci•LtF
l
f ;
• i �
ALLAN SEEK
January 12, ' 1970
Planning Commission Re: Promontory Point
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92660
Gontlemen:
As a neighbor of the subject development, I wish to endorse
it. I feel it will be an asset to the community and to my neigh-
borhood. There are some points to which I think you should give
attention in granting approval, however:
1. Dredging the entrance channel will remove 100 linear- feet
of public beach on the north side of the Balboa Island Channel,
and some compensation should be made, such as dedicating Lhe
Promontory Lagoon as a public. waterwray, , and asking the Corps of
Engineer's to run their harbor lines into the lagoon. I admit that
the 100 feet of beach to be destroyed are not at present in a
condition to be used or enjoyed by the public, but the practice
of letting privated developers dredge away public beaches at will
has resulted in the loss of nearly a mile of public beaches in
Newport Harbor (notably on the south and west sides of Linda Isle)
and it is time for the City to start requiring compensation'.
2. The permit which has been requested includes the blufftop
( "Promontory Point" proper. ) One of the most insistent desires .of
the Newport Tomorrow Townscape Committee was that all future bluff-
top developments provide for a view. drive, somewhat similar to
Cliff Drive in Corona del Mar. Since no specific plans for bluff
top development are shown on the permit, it may be premature to
raise this point.- but the City should be assured that a height
limit of 4.5 feet above mean lower low water will be imposed on all
building in the proposed high-density area below the top of the
bluff. otherwise the question of a view drive might become academic
because the view had all been obscured. If possible, a similar
limit should be placed on trees and other planting along the bluff.
3. The existing Bayside Drive has peen designated as part of
the bicycle path network. 'Care should be taken that the new Bay-
side Drive is sager and more appropriate for this use than the
existing one, which is really quite dangerous. ' I trust that the
strip 8 feet wide along the north side of the new Bayside Drive
will be a bicycle path.
Very truly;yours,
Ci:'2
1— Allan Beek 28 Beacon Bay
t7l �S Newport Beach California 92662 .
To trio Z!C-;port Ci1 "i Oil:
1 soo by tho Local prozaA1'tLL Qnt,jp-
a;r, t Blau fox, a new 1_-r.;; oil, WAWA bra' c cl.ip
::,id itoluiinti is to bG: proz: ;itcd to your boy this
month. '
A3 '71e citi;en, T- ' ,m,ld Me to e:y`,rons :,i; 31,2.
on being opposed to Wing our o::ioA nC Ny anotbor
huntin3tonTar'bor, 1 a':.;,1_izo thr,i: a c-Dmpany r;"ac):,
as t• e Irvine, can pro%ty we' 1 WHY o —,-at: ci .r, ecti. on
it rrn-Lild line to*_port to ,row , O?ace it In •,ye lamest
single londosaner within our boundaries,
1!owev'.r, ti)C y Ca..n ;mot enough ho. ainS on thy,
said. p:'opeity, ,-•& nrobably' rill, without dred.;l.s'1.?
11: *!6, A indeed be pllo^nent to sei..
s„ue of our NO MA contours '.rovain r oa vy
no T•1c.nns can such a plan be called proaoansivo in
my book.
11 crab you for ,you attontion in tvis m,^-t%er, snd
]_1a.'ygy wrestlinS wit:1Juturo pstr ,,1anninC problems
03, t, ey mUsi: ."':'d will aTioe. T verlise the numb_r
of brickbats you receive for outnumb r thn boupets,
COMM.-,,,
" ro , 1si:". C"aarloo S,)
- ton
Ji, ,, .. F�
Y �
r ,
R
I
Crake 1 o�/Q � Balboa
/ • r Corner Island
az
> � ct��l/tl�-G•
/J
� �� tit�- ��u`6 ��./G� �fi.L�L'��.•.�,,
� - RECCIVL• Lt � �"0 `�L
J A(i 0/ :9i t�•:,���- �J, 5"'�U(/- `7/L�,G��z�/ "cS;' �c.C///L�;7-
Chi. C
1.
- . ,, -., - - - , - , __ - ._ - .. - . � _ - - - � ,-' - ., , . _ , , _ _ -- _ _ ' - - - . -- _ . . , -
86D fib I�.N��I�,4/-1.,--�1,-.�s��,I I-.I\
a :.W 48' 10 30{ 3a' SO'= I - - - - _ ' -` -
�,-l-.I�_I_'4.,-----",-NI,��I I�"I I A r��-.-��l,-s 4.r�.-1;�l,I 4l1 I1.k,�I..I1 I I�I1.Z.I-_�IL 4.._I I.-II4-�,_I�l..-I,.-�./�
'I-z;1��II./,,-;,-I.%-v_.�-�p.�I"_,,�1"��,-/III-1 IO,I�I,I II�,I-.,I 1-I.�_.I�-.,_,,I_.I_l_--L-7,,\_.I,I_�,__l�7I I�-.-���-'�I�I I�,,.I_;�!�.I_-1_I..,��-_-Ir-i,I,,;1�1_-I.--�I�F
�I-�/`,.:L t�/O--.I I
�-I�.-.-_"--I-I..I14 1--.--�I n---,I I�I.-I-.-.�..1�--,II-_."�,-.�I.�-I.--I�_.I�I�I�I-I-�II,-
---I,.I..,.,.�I-I,�'1--I I--.:.I.�I flI,I.�-�I,!L-I1�-.!l,I I,,-4 I I
I.I4:-�-,I�-_���-I:��;.�lI I�.--_-,I I'I
�I IiI��I I,.:,I'I I I$,I I��-II.�--,I�.1 A-1 I-1�II,..,-7 II I,I-4�4\I I�I 1-III��I.I�_..'II1 r II,,-�,I-I,I��_I I-1
�--�I--,/.,
II
6' 31' it' _ 10' - 10, ' -10`. 10' 10' 1p' - 10' .. - ,
I.
II
II
lI
II
III
III
II
ti I 8' . 11, 11, 1 . 8, .
i 1' S' 1' 1 q' t
1'
a ��"PE Fi 01. I.7 6t L Vi RFS.
PEg ° S4 PE F(.� �__ L� 1�- - jam. w
LTD 1 I--7 � _�- T � z _
J J Z
II
-�_I.V\_�-..I�I.I-"1,I.,1-I.��_��IF%I-I.".fI,�I'./,,-:�I':F.,_,I,-.,.-I�I 1I--�,L,,II i I1I,-,I��l,I,I I:,-,I'�'__I/
"F_.,,I�I-I�1.-..I---/.I,I 1I-I"1,,.,�.I�,"��I,,1I",-
A--,I,-,,,�I I��,I�_-�_,I�,'Ii II 1�I i_,��o-,I-.I-.��"\\�\I I.-.,I II�"�I,I'I-�-I I-II,�1 I�.I,.I/I�.,--�-,,1�/�-,1I-�,,,'_I-,I�I 1,r',�.
�_,1.%�'�I1�II"'-"f.�.I,�1�1�1 1I-,,.',,II,_.I%-,I V�"I�1L I.�!I.,.,�I..I,,I��-II,.�,��-�,.�I,VF.LLI�-�I 1�I\",���,-,
I1Fl/�.II ff-,1".11,�.1'I,-_I I,��,-I-�I,,I--,..1:.,II..-/,-_,-I\�,..�I,1,.,�����1-I 1 II�-I,-"1�_I-"".*--"I%III_�,���'I..,�.vI,,I1�I.LL�1-I I.LL�,I.,1 I,,
I-��-���-I,IlV'�--/,.,,I iI,.'/_��\1.1 1��,�-v I,11I i,1 l�',,�,I II.I,-I�k I"I--�.��I./-I II-I��,-.!�I I;LI t"�-�III,1k-�1'..--1jI-I-
�,��I��-l/--I-."-,1III�1 I I,,11I-yI1�,-.�,11,�T1�'tII-"�N ii II_I I-,.1
'.I.'1.���11��,/.\I1 1."1t d�,N%I�1"�,..-_,l.--.I_1/i,1`,,���,1_1 I,,/�,,,1�II�'.�".-;..,,,�---1-1�../..,i�4.%L.��-I1'��?,I-`fIN�.�",��I;,�,,Ii,��-,1 I;���.,I-.i FI,�-;";I�;1�,,I��",�/�,,,III-_11��II,I"-;-,.�AI"",..I\,-I,,"I NI1,�-�I 1,""I!!j,I,I'�,,,"I�I",-'I,,-.,\',./,.I"-'1 k��",�I�,II,,I.�1.,,,,.:\�I I,r.,I
3 D .-- d E J
3 a 6
3 I - w L { w
. I _ f 3 - 1 i 1 I 1 � Y d . � '
w g � w d
q 1 - - SECTION b-b ' , - .
RELOCATED , WSIDE `DRIVE 60' ENTRANCE STREET EXISTING &AYSIDE DRIVE so' MIN. Ito' 30' MIN. 84, -
60 30,
30' 3D'- 11' 10' 10' If 10' 50' BO' MIN. 50' 10' d 11' i11 V 8`
10' 1 D' - aF
1' I 1B` 11' 99'_i_ -
. . , � I 1 - �_? NEw
_ 1`` I OLD 3' 6AYSIDE- DR.
__,� P,,,F _ �I 6AYSIDE DR.
�- 7 1 SE6TIDq TNR�UGB 1A000N
. _. �� SECTION A-A .
"- _ _ •' - - - _ . EXISTINb WAYSIDE DRIVE .. .- • SCALES IN=SoJ . -
/ 1'1/ _ , :� TY .P: IZAL STREET SECTIONS CDT rD SCALE -
�- -
t , // _ \ IO COSTT. A C. PAVEMENT OVER AP,. WITH SEAL AND PRIME COAT. ,I - ' , , bULKNEAD LINE buLKNEAI LINE -
� I ` " / 20 CONST. ' CONCRETE C11R6 GUTTER 50' MIN. . 50` MIN. a SD' MIN. 56' MIN. '
I f �.,
°i ..
tl DROPOS/F_D . buSIDE ` - 3O CONTT 4' P.C.C. SIDEWALK. - `. 4 - 4
-DRIVE REALIGNMENT - 4 44
- - �� _ }FfrP - - ' P - - - r ,
..i. 9.;" f .Y/ `.ypv t q c
I I K y\
u�
- . :/,.ate `' �\ -
yA' n :�/ \ ax '^� . lg' DR E
��- <, / ' \ v I DRIYE o
- `+ , ' ' 1 . � .,
'.I � " - . - - - _ - . - -
�� t`i % x` " f^i I
/"" " / /` i, I - _ - _ - - -- ,
-" - _ ,o r , , /�' - �,, 1 I 1 OLD bAYS1DE DRIVE ti -
\ - "F";t;t - ' ` $ { - NEW 6AYSIDE DRIVE
a,x
' / ''f I �\1, 1.,.` q,x N 1• ). d. .+�i
\ ,
1:,
I - '��i. \!\ � I _ A\ ,'
x_ 0 9\aVf"p l� \\ I \ �'� _
\ , ,_._-*''" , i, TYPICAL IPUILDIN6 SITE
\ . i'
.:3a r `'\� FOR LOTS LOCATED ON OLD N NEW /
v a \\ \ \. -, \ - 6AYSIDE DRIVE ///
,t•, n
\ \ }" r SCALE= I" 40' j1
1' 1 \ 1 / f
?Q 0�g '`ea>. - `I\\\ \'\ \ It i \ �+��,,. S'? - ' ±s,,r - ;__``^,• ---- _ - - - / Jf
a I I �`
\_ _,
- c. V� s - fan ,\ /, - ,,r " - '._,,, ._ , l - F.
. - a'. - 0 J`l " `\ ` '\ SS c4 •" l/_ ' / / + / - - , >. _ - - �- __ ___-�a�_"_ -'k - - k -i ''
P-a- _ �a 1. P'� s y\PJ' s0 "'�+,. ' \\ `. 1 f \ ,\ _`'".:=' -..,= - _�, \ �' _ - _ i - -\ \\ I` "--+- _.--,max, ,--.:rl;.�ti. ..__ ,v _ ' ,_
"__..'�,I_.��-,,-;'�'�III I lII,��1 III,I 1 I-,-F I�,1./Y�.I i I.,���II1�-,,I�F,:-,1._,���.,I\,-L.-I_I:,-�I,I II,F�_,�L�..III1�,,-,I�fl9,",I��-_RI 4-,,���-I_._-I 1 I--\,_L._I,.�_I�*I,\-�_.---I--!,._�-
I' , - N S �" / . 'ate .e, . \ -- .},_ , _ \ Ii I/ . , r a ,
a C, - `�/ I - .
I . 0 0, - i
F
b ...\ _ _
00 Son - / " =:r \` a.1 ;_ _ _ '-r'
eF'
\ t
$' w'
f
% t�7 P
U' q
c
/ /
V � 1
S Q
1, �\ � r P
o� Jr 0 ,i
Il
Ph' k
O .
�\ iY
tr
°
A T
A
- � P -
s , D . �.
a T
1 _ 1
. :
- - - A x
A
_ 1. ?I'
. % ,
r -
s \. :
S f t
s . - :
�, ._
4 -
, ,
, n
8 - -
.F
A -
B D
s -
A s 7 t
R s F _ --C � _J O t�
/ Y1
n,
v . v
H • I �/
'
o _ _E � I_
Xrs 6 tR as - { . r -
. . - - -St - _ Y -
F x__
"��� i, F
5- -
s �`" cR I ss 1 -
- N
, per-" _ _ _ _ _...,�{mi..£ _ _.. ^0. - . 'ci.
V- _ - k, ,.
j R
` a
p - .f _ - ' T
1. I o .; ,.
" ,^ _ _ ,
p N \ m
,�r lYf X �:y rf7 { 4 / \ -. _ _ - w r „b, "w,x, 4 /> - : - - y• r< / ,
/'. - - _ -
` F:il a _ -\ • - - _ Z5' 45 17 :5 I - \ \, _ - - -
-
, _ \
-110 1 �/
S \
M
.. ! L N., S' . 1" F \ _ - _ ' _ - _ - _ _ p ..Xr.r. :9Y i II I I - . - - \ - - -
\` * \ �" / L .� •T :UA - . " -_- - g� - MqX R4GF a; -, .1+L, f` _ >-F _ \ _
sr _ µ�. _0 / _ _ - _ . ,_ JS OAJ �' ' G ,,- `` - -
- 'l \���/ _..-,/ PIERNEAD LINE _ " ., > , N} G� \ \
fjl I t - __ 5- - - a - - , .
'' S8> " ✓0 \ /, ,J t\ '� U _ _ L.N \ *J' - - - _ ...\ / Y 1.'1ML.q- ' m ••+' {° I I •ram L•� - .� ._ -
-50' -"40' -,.5 '- - 50' - - 50 _59'__ - 5 5 ' -.5 ' 3D' S9' S0' . - 50-- -50' SD'� - 50' - 50' 50' 110 • '.•, J; '
y :.. \ s. R LKHEAD E 4a
9 48 50' so, _ 50 a
o \C
, ` qq + a \
28
°' > 21 _
,' s ' '-
• Y- ' ,; \ -
8 -- 26- : `15 0, 14 : T1 _ III =�I" _ a -- _�Ig IT I6 - - 15 14. a 13 -IZ IL -10 = 9 B. 1 6 5 ": - 4 ' _ ..� Z.' � I � � �,�.r. � � � � .
rep I - ^ 1 11., w _ s` _ �... i:w y I
5, m is any - _._ _ __- _-_.- - - _ - - -- �.r .e _�'R' $ �� _ 1,.,.tuw. i.4w.>._ u< h .:t{;'�, _4�,•�y,� � r/ �\-_ e1•� _ _ „`�
v - _ _ _ _ _ _
D ' _ _ -_ _ _ _ __ _ _
\\\
_'.•_..�„ '� `� A`'•,� s{I .• SI'' _ • SD' xlru:,• -.� ""SI §_ , � - " 4. `,,'- ;m;'e, L, 1 .: _
'� _ ____ __ ___ _ _ _ __ ___ _ _
``' f , c sc,---'z., _"- - - - '1' _ - --- I- -1 lys:ek '-.- '; =:.r 44"W) -
JI ,,,,_
1 . \ - - --�- : p vcP e^v.ce .I cPD LNGA . 2 -41
_ _ _
v a
_-
^�.�� s
,
I ( I s 4^fi&,"b°", E Y 4.- +__ - - SOIM3 GAS, x Xl T={. .v- - 21'Y P'n L ' .ta- •,r; F,."fi, . _ _ 1' P. ,
t.- f -. Itt _ �a / Z v. 0 sE �L_ --
I , �4Ss4-- ,,«':*'-s'ez `�"=,- _.�-.- ^"'+-. - a. =.`---� - - - - -.�'_ "---'_�- -T=-`"".,. ' --.,_.:xi..�;=. :._y,«..+, _".: +�.. .T__ s _-i�f 1_' Q,R1T R.f�NgYilt'-........ _.:. .._ �_ i- --��- -{:-
'..�""^.--'•, r..^w$'' ��.. ax b.o _?;:?`;': _ _ - x,s.,•`y"`a __e .s,<- _ +-T-..,ag _ _ - "^-=1s _ __"I_ -__ _
'i." ,. I - 1 ! "^,e--.a _,w.-:.:ei,' ', t' :'�.e _a'^ 'u,r . •ci.>r:-rF,^:`..a,�,-J:n._..`x-">�:'-+' T- - `-----,s('z- 0.5T, •s-•,+r-_•----r---~ - ... [ _. __ _
I .,2 _ ` _"n", w-.'m -- ._.�T'"„v'._'yam _'- - - R•45 _ �.. F�tlsF"^N;AIf� ;e ..� ,.a' „,d.. / ,Px x. .,-, _ -'j - _
. _ -' - --'" _ - _ . -__ _ _ - R - 1..N.' .,yak,>h , r av7,,,4-i ' ,,5t ,.a-n a:'''"-co"'�::'->r'- , .,.y _ - _ 3 ,
1 - fi` t- - _ - FN40.: �;,;,,,,.r_F„ri,•a r '" Otto �1($1., tb_.✓'_.- ";';z ..m'h'.s�!' ..:=+r - .
'][ I'yu® w .S�' `-..�1 'b 1.,,"y�O{, '4e: Yr ,.9`.', f„n, S"v[` - _
I 1' 1 l I i T { I 3 I _ .S '>•p ',Y�..n" 3: v "$A st x y. ,.''.r:'rti. "^�.m,.s •_. ."r... '1� - _ - D .
I I s t ! - I _ - s-I IJ .rs ,s` _ _ _ ,'.cq,mro-•�... ..:La 7 .`--ar_ r "£'"` -" ^'l'r'�'w' - - k ! .
I I '' ! _ I^-'" t : 4 �- i �-. `'^'I�., ;S� a 3 - -'•^""""".`----'1 '4`� - - , 'I A 'D -
I .. 1 . I I -I + �. - 1- I, _ ,I .1} - _ I _ __ i - " i . _ _ - ,`c',5%"ce; .u.T. ¢;I, 100 v _. _ _ I� ' J�_ .�._ __-{ `R4'/ 2 . lz '
I / I 1 ,I I 1 ,- t. I I- i - _ .1. - ..i rr- 5"s.ri -'----- _ r _ 4:, "_-""`I /i .. v 5 _ -_ - - ,' u _( 1 _ _ _. _ x - - _
/ _
I
_ _ - � -
_ _
r
?';., , ! c_ _. -; h - ! I 1 --t I' - i i. _ _ r - - _ .; `y }� n _ _ I I '�„_.r-�„ _ .-I
, I I 'I , . ,_:. . ' , .. "I F F x .- I �. __} I _ \��
[.• 1 , i I - ., � . - I I ;I I. I I - . - - T t.... ._ Y .1 . :- _._ q,.__S I E, ''s . . " F' _1 I l ,
kJ". / . I i , 1 t -? I B4 e z I __ . Gf. I- 1: { . 1.
_I I I I 1 1 - , I - l I . , v F>, ., r._. I i • ( - ,'i... I -'--1 � " - ,
•A , 1 I� i 1 I I .I I { - - - -' . . _ _ . - _ . Y--I " , j .. I { ' i _ - _ +----^; _ _..._- J - (// -O /V " .
I,_.I.",_IT�I
A-I'._-'1,�.�I,1:�.�-L.,I 1.I R,I:,I.E�.I II I�I�S I,,�IK.�'._I.,LI.I1 IEL l I.,�l7�,Iv�-I-:1 dE!I-_D,--,I-I�,.-I-�I F,,-'�I-,-F:N'��-IL l_O-I���.-RI",
I:�EI�_II�.T.K,,,,-
i I J. I ' - I _ - , _ A „r, z ` :`S 1 i I ._ __. , , _ �+r4„ 1_ 1'' . . . - �..__ - -- ^'""..L f _ ,, •,,.-,1
,,,,, ' . . ... i i - ' - . _ - - fr _ �C?4T I_ :"_ rn ?3 I i f �� 't 1 - __ / -I _ I� D` --� _ {!S 't v
_ i - - - _ _ - _ _ - _ I G ` '.nt r I I ` II I f' / - r- tv. J { - t < t4 , �-_'"
f , - . - I x , !, O,t I I, _._-I I - -..I _ _ v i } ,,.._.. _. -- r ~ f -
- _ _ .. ' vim- , 1.,s 1__' I I .iy.`. ' A. I ! I _ / - I . - _ _-. :"I - _
- _. . _ - - _. ,.- „t. �s I - e" - - - --- - 5EAWALL� v
j(
.
- -G ENE. RAL N OTES - ,,., �'- _�_ I ., - -_ - -- - ; ,
- _ - -
. _ - / m _J 1 - 3� --- __ i , _ - - V.
.. „ - -INDICATES MANHOLE 1. � ._ ";I '".'.� ' _ - -..--_- t, -_y _ - � . _ � . ..
Y 'Ry _e '/ - 3 II
[ ALL PROPOSED , SEWER ' MAINS . . SNOIVN TNDS � . I } - E` v,. ,I" - . -
. mSI - ;'.
(SIiE PER PLAN) ` h- s2 = " G: F_x_ Is s i; u y
, _ _ _ . "
- - I - - 1. ALL,`-,PROPOSED_ )VATER , ' .MA1NS '' . SH010N ^THUx _ _
(SIiE PER PLAN) , _"
I
3: -STREET - IMPROVEMENTS , fIlEI WATER`SYSTE'NIFl_ Hli I SENOR' =SYSTEM, AND ' THE STORM DRAIN
- SYSTEM . SHALL , CONFORM -10 THE_ STANDARbS",.'OF - THE CITY, .OF-NEWPORT BEACH. W ,
I 4. LOTS. INDICATED PAY THE LETTERS ' "A";; 6" { C G "D" AND LOT 63 ARE HOT RESIDENTIAL AT
VE MAP
- - - . . . LOTS. - _ . .
- 5. EXIST. iDNE UNCLASSIFIED -
\ P ROM ONTORY 6AY /
- - - ACT N ® 386 7
. - - .
- T � .
- 4 RE[ORD OIVNER E DEU€LOPER 6E1N6 -_ A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DF A :PORTION ' : OF &LOCK 94 OF IRVINE'S SU6DIVISION AS , '
-.
- <
SH01VN "-DN' " A ` MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN 65.0K ; I PAGE 88. OF 1M. M. RECORDS OF • ORANGE .
. THE IRV NE OMPA
. . .
. s _ COUN7 CALIFORNIA._ .
- . . • T I CENTER GDRIVE N
x " "
,. : . . - -
. - ACH CALIFORNIA IN ' T,HE ` ` ,CITY OF - -NE U 6EACN' • ' COUNTY OF ORANGE STATE ' OF ' CALIF.
550 NEIVPOR
NEWDDRT 6E
- - -
. 44 - . .
DRONE 6 3011 '
.. ` . `. \ - 14-0 ACRES 61'. RESIDENTIAL, LOTS JANUAV ' Im
r.,.•
P .I. , : _ - 5 T,
, - . - .
, . - T "6 RE . B" .-B�o�nAes®�CI`AATES' .,"`
-.,. _ Ep RAU
- - WT "C R CIVIL ENGINEERS AND .,LAND SURVEYORS '� ..
.
t-.
R. •`
r,
ACI TY
SERVED: FOR' PLANTED AREA:
ESERVED" FOR COMMON WATERIVAY ACCESS AR
. - - - .. ' _ _ - t _ MART LI COSTA DIVES AT
CAOFORNIA TEL 17141 648-7783', p .r
' LOT "D" RESERVED FOR PARKING b NA F- I
, ': ., - - - I � <.' . LOT,"E" RESERVED.-_ FOR _ PARK SITE. '
'; - III - : . " LOT 63 RESERYED . FOR ` COMMERCIAL SITE.
a :Y iT - •11 1-1D `, I' I00' .11091 .
.
,
.: ry - _ -
, h
L. 4.°53'5a"
R• 1950.00'
L• l(o(n.T�j�
n'
� pp.
' m�3 3S
s �
°
0
s
R•450.00 � -
O
5�r-1� �e
-o sa5. o,W 0o
42.o0
m
Ir o.o0
6 O
Lo
L-n �.._
QQ `I
d of _ h'�CHIyAY
.''
f
• i No
Ni
• � P. O.B. _ 2 _
r
Sal"4-G'Sal F 70. /
Ico50o' 0.'�S79,
± SEi4°4Cn'98°E ,
0 105,00�
O s75°ot'�j8'E
D
O
°
0
0
O
O
vs -
o _
0
�- uJ
2
� 2
------- 6AYSIDE -------- ---" --- -- — --- ----- - --- ,p - p2NE N5`11'040E I
CIO
5 ba-'4to'33"E I I l2 G l' _Q
S TO'S9'5G`E ---- -- - - -- - - --- ------ --- -------- ------ ----""- ------- - - - -- - - - -- -- --------- - ----"----- ------ sa4°4te'�3`E ` 584-04(>'33"E
ZOI 1± ------ -M—
p• 13°4fo°3?" 55013'27�V\)
2.•Co4.93' .
L•7Co30'
Q` tz'Cot°08 z8"W
• � l2-..co9' .
\9 _ tJ89.08'i4"W
15.00'
tJ 00°51'4(>'E
108.SCa'
lJ
A POZT\O�l OF BLOC V- 94 <�
OF 1�2VI[JE'S SU2�OIVIS10t�1 d
PE2. M. Q . M. \ ' 88 1j` SB9°Q8'14"E
° 1�7.00
0 51'4-(<"E SCALE; \'•\00'
2 l IS.oto
_ l(oT0. 83' TO S-'tJ• \OI---��
ci U. S. 6UL-KNEAD LkNE se9°os'r4'E
It�S oo'
- THE IRVINE COMPANY PROJECT: USE PE2fMlT SHEET OF
Py-OM\OtJTOIZ.Y Pot tvT
TITLE: BOutJOP.R.Y PS_P."T
550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE • (714) 644-3011 DWN. BY Zw-) OATEI9SJO\)0 FILE NUMBER
NEWPORT BEACH , CALIFORNIA 92660
NO. REVISED BY DATE CKD. BY GAi2. BASE MAP 2.
a +/3% �x2 S \\ \ a
74
o
o /p
❑ ❑ ❑ CI �� a�.
�,x 3 p qF ` qA
F
+0
30 r� •l \l\�-`i� 1/ .�,� 3�
a s10
u d — °
NN
0 o O S 30 ;�� � � •_,� ��`� V `a � Or �70
o �
to 9D AC 5D 60
19
o
----
Qo
.
3 T
/ \
"S3-�O
J �
�46T0 / P
CDAgT ,
� o
s
—\ 30 - - - - - - -
z
90 � � 04 tAo m' _
c'
/o t ,° n ppD O
A `ma's YS/pE s 2
f + n T O + DRIVE
�J —
:Ei 61
(9 7:77 .7
+ q6l 1�j + 0 (9
LLA
'�` / c� I � - n v
9O []E:D n I COOT I n Ap EJ
-01 A-
/
L + s LM
� t �J
e' a °
E � `l��JLu �J�I u 0 FAO
`04TS 4C
�� • . . . . . .. , :. • - . . . . . . • . : . ' . . . •• . salvo .. . . . . . . �. � . .. . . . . .:: , " -- -- !o
_ v - — - •• _�_ .. . �� . . . _
r L�L�Lf�I � LL l SEAWALL
L� `-' � ��l Ll,llr� LI LI III1/II'I III(/{I1I
t
i F
w
y A
•
• • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
Is
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
go 0
• • • • • Is • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
000
• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • e • • u
• • •• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • •
Is
• • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • e • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •-•e e
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • •
GO
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • •-•-•-•-•-•-•-•'•-'-'°'e-e-•-•-•-•-e-e-•-•-•-•-•-'-'•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-e- • • • •-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-••
' • • • • / -
• ' ' • • • • \••e-•-•-e-e-e-•-e-e°r`'°'°'°'e-e-•-•-e-e---'-'°,°,°,°,°,°,°e•-•-•-e-e-e°'°'°'°'°,°,°••e•.e-•-.-.-•°•-,°,°,°,-.-e-e°.• ` -
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • s
• , • • Is
• • • • • ,°,°••♦••♦••••••♦•♦♦.•-••e-e-e-e-•♦••••••••-e•e••eee••e.♦-•-eee• ••e••a••e•-.-•-•-.-,°,°,°'-'-'•'°'•-• •-•-•-•-•-e-•-•-•-•
• • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • •-•-•-•-•-,° • • • • • • • • • •-•-e-•-,°,• • • • • • • • • • • •-•-•-•-•- • • •
• • • sp
• •O'o• • • • • - • -_• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •-•-e-•-•-,-,• • • • e e • e
0.
. . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• • • • : : : : • • • : : • • ♦ •e:•:•:e:1 :•:-:-:•:e:-::•:e:-:•:e:-:•:e:e:•:e:-:•:••e•••:-:.:•:e:e:•:•:e:e:e* Is-.-••-•••:•:e:-:.:•:•:-.°,°,°,°,°••••-••eeeeee••eeeeeeeeeeeee•eeee•••-••..•••-••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •-•-•-•-,-•°,°,-,°,• • • • • • • • • • • • o
• • , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • '°-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-,°,°,°,°,°,°,°,eee••-•.•-•-••••,.•
• • • • • • • ••e-eee•-•-•- • • • • • • • • Soso*e•••e-e-e-e-•,--♦-,,-°,°,,-,,,• • • • • • • • • • • •
OO*O
e• •••,•, • • ••• • •• • • •• e.•.• .• .• • • • • • • • e • ♦ , , • • • • • •••
• • • • • 00
• • • e • • •-♦-,-,°,°,°,°,•° • e•°° ee • • • •-
, - -
, , e , , •ee•e. . . • • • . . . . . . ••.•.• • • •- • • •. . . . . . . ••.•.• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • •
. . • • .•.•.-e-•-.-.•.•.• s e ° ° - - . . • • . . • •• •r
. •*Oso . • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . • . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
. ... . .
. . ......... ..... . . .
- • • -.° ° ° ° - ° °.• • • •.•.•.•.•.•.•.♦. - - - ° • • • . . . . . . . . . . *so : •.
. . . . .. . . • . . . . . • • 00 . . . . . . e e. . . . . • • • •, • • • • • • • • • • • • , , , , , ,., -• e -•.ee
• • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
0.0 Is
*we • 1- 0• I♦••• • • • •• • • • • • • • Is • •
• • Is • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
e - ° • • • • • • •- •A• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
a coo1�; A
. . . . . . . . . .
Is
. . . . . . ,
• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B - • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' ' • • • •
YSIDE • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
DRIVE • • • . . . . . ; � •
: • • • • • : : : • • >'3 �,A
W �
C�
V
LEGEND
• • • • • • • • • Low Density Residential ,Q. N E W P ORT `
. . . . . . N B `4Y
High Density Residential
Commercial
THE IRVINE COMPANY TITLE: PRECISE LAND USE PLAN
P LAN N ING DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: PROMONTORY POINT
550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE ° (714) 644.3011
NEWPORT BEACH , CALIFORNIA 92660 SCALE: DEC 16 1969 DATE: 0 100
FILE:
d r
90' IN. 180 10' MIN. 14,
%0' MIN., 60' . 10' 10'
It NEW
OLD
- _ bAYSIpE DR.'
tHT 119 TNR811GN U666%
j . � � bUEY,N€AD 'LINE
116U6KNEA0 LIRE Sol Nip 5p' Mir o
w MIN
( •,L
Nip
tl I
-b OLD 6AYSIDE DRIVE
M
\ - ` /
_—�� NEW6AYSIDE DRIVE ,
q 9
"PUL BUILDING SITE
�,, handy �� -I ` �/, '� -\• +,r? '� -
FOR LOiS •LDCATED: ON OLD $ NEW,
I 1 s - \ 6AYSIDE DRIVE ,
\� ': \ SCALE= I"^40'
I
ti 1 /Jj
I
J }
/
LL
If
T `' /�� , / / / / / /� \ F\\ \ \ I �5 -__�'dt-.__.�... T^r�hb a.i��' /�cg� • Y X • +
ti VR1
1001
n
I R/v too•' �— _ - - _ _ _ � \I \A \ \ AJ� / "�,���), �°
;'•iiM- Q M
&0 p h �,,
Ak &47- I I t \
_j �
,� 79 +6s
,• 2B 7 7
26 `15 `l4 13 22 .2 I8 �fi� I•�- 45 —1 13 I� _11 --•Ip 9 'B� �1_ -6-- 5- 4— —3—
g 24�•wnuEG0. Su6NARR1�f ' ` 24 Vca
— —
WK. -
I ^,.v 70t�a"was�— �'�-.-.e {?1'v 6PJ '� � —{ .. ."t • ° °—a. v.C4110AE REtlff��D_ �: r_ �� —(�— ��.-�-,�,,,,_
'. ! I 1 '� ._.-„" •� --".__.`___.—_--_. —' �(3'GAS) _ fN EXIST 6' AL.P ry1
• — s v _ x v <J -- 1 I //s
,_.. �'
qr
{ f
I—� (•, , ` I i "'""_..-�� -_�--- ...�-..-- - — SEAWALL
PKIDA NTOKY POINT
P L 0T P LAN
.. ..
RAUB REIN FROBT
AND -.-ABSCCIAT s; I
- •CIVIL 'EcNGiNEERb AND LgND SURy$TCR'S-
i- 43B qOC HE HT 2� ETREET
GOB TA. ME94, I:ALIFOLINIA I TEY: [71iT 3A0- !7141
m......Lm. IlA (•T`i9 �•.AS=SHOWN ..—.s..�.