HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.0_Circulation Element Update_PA2017-141
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT March 18, 2021 Agenda Item No. 4
SUBJECT: Initial Draft of the General Plan Circulation Element Update
(PA2017-141) SITE LOCATION: Citywide APPLICANT: City of Newport Beach ENGINEER: Tony Brine, City Traffic Engineer
tbrine@newportbeachca.gov, 949-644-3329
PROJECT SUMMARY A Study Session presentation and discussion of the Initial Draft of the General Plan
Circulation Element Update.
RECOMMENDATION Review and provide input and direction to staff.
DISCUSSION
Introduction
The City’s Circulation Element was last updated in 2006. It is now being updated in
conjunction with the 6th Cycle Housing Element addressing the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation of 4,845 new units. The updated Circulation Element must respond to State mandates that have come into
effect since the last update. The Complete Streets Act of 2008 requires cities to plan for
a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of streets, roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel. Senate Bill 743 (Chapter 386, Statues 2013) requires Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the metric for determining transportation impacts in CEQA analysis. Additionally, emerging technologies such as
autonomous and connected vehicles, and the increased use of electric vehicles, and
ridesharing platforms require new policies be considered to effectively plan for the future of transportation in our community. Background
The City contracted with LSA Associates and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to develop the updated Circulation Element. On September 17, 2020, a presentation was
1
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE2
Initial Draft of General Plan Circulation Element Update Planning Commission, March 18, 2021 Page 2
made to the Planning Commission outlining the plans for outreach with the community during the development of the Circulation Element update. As part of the Staff Report on September 17, 2020, an “Issues White Paper” was provided, which covered topics that could be included in the update. On October 13, 2020, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2020-93 delegating the duties to the Planning Commission to oversee the
update process and to provide strategic guidance and a public forum for discussion of the update. Subsequently, Commissioner Koetting was appointed to work with the Outreach Subcommittee of the Housing Element Update Advisory Committee that assisted staff with the outreach process.
On November 19, 2020, staff presented to the Planning Commission an Introduction to the Circulation Element. Staff outlined the key terminology and discussed the eight (8) existing Themes which are a part of the 2006 Circulation Element. Additionally, the Master Plan of Streets and Highways and the Bicycle Master Plan were covered. To conclude the presentation, staff outlined the plan for a series of Public Workshops and outreach
during the fall of 2020 and early 2021.
Community Outreach and Engagement To date, the public outreach process has included four (4) virtual workshops. The first
virtual Public Workshop was held on November 23, 2020. The workshop was an introductory “Circulation Element 101” session. The workshop provided an opportunity for staff to introduce the existing 2006 Circulation Element, and also to engage with the residents and begin receiving comments and feedback. There was an attendance of 45 participants. The public showed an interest in bicycle and pedestrian safety, emerging
transportation modes, the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis, telecommuting effects, and coordination with adjacent jurisdictions. Back-to-back virtual Public Workshops were held on December 15 and 16, 2020. Each Theme section of the Circulation Element was discussed in more detail. The existing
Themes include Mobility, Roadway System, Regional Transportation, Public
Transportation, Alternative Transportation Modes, Transportation Systems Management,
Parking, and Transportation Funding. The current Goals and Policies were covered in detail. A robust exchange of verbal and written comments and questions was a part of these workshops. The public was interested in Complete Streets, bicycle infrastructure,
climate change, regional traffic impacts in neighborhoods, electric vehicles, rideshare operations (e.g., Uber and Lyft), autonomous vehicles, and parking availability. The fourth virtual Public Workshop was held on February 10, 2021. This workshop was presented as a Visioning opportunity. Staff discussed the comments and ideas that we
heard from the community in the previous workshops. There was a discussion in this workshop with regards to maintaining consistency with the OCTA Master Plan of Arterial Highways. Possible loss of funding and the process to make any changes to the Master Plan was covered in detail. The primary goal of the workshop was to outline the policies that would not be changing, and policies that are proposed to be modified or added.
3
Initial Draft of General Plan Circulation Element Update Planning Commission, March 18, 2021 Page 3
Overview of the Update The majority of the existing policies are not proposed to be changed. They are general policies for providing an integrated transportation system, supporting public transit, maintaining regional consistency with the OCTA Master Plan, improving traffic signal
operations, providing adequate parking for development, etc. These important goals and policies are still relevant today and will be in the future. The policies that are proposed to be modified and added are a direct result of the State mandates to support Complete Streets and VMT, community input and some staff
proposals. A new section has been added to specifically cover new policies addressing Climate
Change by reducing VMT and greenhouse gas emissions. There are three new policies related to VMT methodology and mitigation measures. There is also a new policy to
reduce passenger car use by using curbside right-of-way for rideshare drop-off, valet, and delivery. A policy is added requiring the addition of Electric Vehicle charging stations throughout the city. A new section has been added to address Emerging Technology. There are new policies
for monitoring rideshare (e.g., Uber and Lyft) volumes, to plan for autonomous and connected vehicles, to communicate with wayfinding providers (e.g., WAZE, apple Maps, Google Maps, etc.) to reduce regional traffic within neighborhoods, and considering deployment of parking application technology to identify available parking spaces.
The existing 2014 Bicycle Master Plan is incorporated in the updated Circulation Element, with a policy to plan, fund and implement active transportation projects outlined in the Master Plan. Bicycle supporting facilities including bike racks, bike stations or lockers are to be incorporated into certain new development projects. To address a regularly raised topic, a new policy is added to review bicycle sidewalk use, review sidewalk widths and
consider separate facilities for e-bikes and other semi-motorized modes to reduce conflicts. Complete Streets and roadway safety are very important issues. A policy has been added to develop a Complete Streets master plan. The Orange County Council of Governments
Complete Streets Initiative Design Handbook will be the foundation for the master plan. To address roadway safety for all users, a policy is added to implement traffic safety improvements following the practices of the industry-recognized “Safe System Approach”.
4
Initial Draft of General Plan Circulation Element Update Planning Commission, March 18, 2021 Page 4
Next Steps and Summary City staff is presenting the Initial Draft of the Circulation Element Update for discussion and is looking for the Planning Commission to review the draft document and provide input and direction. Staff will be conducting a Virtual Public Workshop on April 5, 2021,
starting at 6 p.m. in the evening to solicit feedback on the initial draft. The draft will also be presented to City Council in May where the Council can review and provide input and direction. Over this Summer, a complete traffic analysis will be prepared as part of the analysis of
both the Housing and Circulation Element updates. The analysis will evaluate the inclusion of all of the housing units anticipated by the draft Housing Element. The traffic study will contain a traditional intersection level of service (LOS) analysis given existing and proposed Circulation Element policies requiring this type of analysis. It will be used for roadway and intersection planning purposes only. The traffic analysis will be prepared
per the requirements of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO). The results of the traffic analysis could indicate changes to the City’s Master Plan of Streets and Highways. The LOS analysis will not be part of the draft EIR because the impacts of vehicle delay are no longer part of the CEQA impact analysis process pursuant to State law (SB 743). The traffic analysis will include an assessment of VMT and it will be incorporated within the
DEIR as VMT is the new traffic metric for CEQA analysis pursuant to SB 743. Going forward, the update schedule will be:
• March 18, 2021 – Planning Commission Study Session
• April 5, 2021 – Virtual Public Workshop
• May 11 or 25, 2021 – City Council Study Session
• EIR Comment Period – Summer 2021
• August 2021 – Public Workshop and Planning Commission Study Session
• September 2021 – Planning Commission public hearing
• October 2021 – City Council public hearing Environmental Review
This is a discussion item and no action will be taken and as a result, it is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City is in the process of preparing a draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Housing and Circulation Element Updates that will be available later this Summer. Adoption of the updates would occur
after preparation and certification of the Final EIR.
5
Initial Draft of General Plan Circulation Element Update Planning Commission, March 18, 2021 Page 5
Public Notice The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting) and it was posted at City Hall and on the City website. In addition to the required noticing, advance notice has been provided through the City's social media
accounts (e.g., Nextdoor, etc.), e-notification system, and utility bill inserts. Prepared by: Submitted By:
ATTACHMENTS PC 1 Initial Draft of the General Plan Circulation Element Update
6
Attachment No. PC 1
Initial Draft of the General Plan Circulation
Element Update
7
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE8
DRAFT
City of Newport Beach
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
9
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE10
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-2
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
A Safe and Convenient Transportation System for All
Introduction DRAFT
The County of Orange continues to grow as a thriving urban residential and employment region.
Over the years, Newport Beach has transformed along with the County. Once a small community
and seasonal getaway, Newport Beach is now home to 86,000 residents and is a global destination
for travel. As a result, travel in Newport Beach and the surrounding communities has evolved.
Demographics and technology are changing the demand for and delivery of different travel modes.
The legacy of the pandemic may also further change travel demand and travel habits. The trend from
regional and State levels of governments has been to provide greater regulation regarding the
planning and programming of transportation. The Circulation Element of the Newport Beach
General Plan governs the long term development of mobility systems in the City of Newport Beach
and provides the best opportunity for the City to establish its vision of mobility. The Circulation
Element acknowledges the influences of local, regional, State and federal guidance and regulation,
and expresses the ultimate vision of mobility to respond to the needs and objectives of Newport
Beach residents. The goals and policies in the Circulation Element are balanced with the goals and
policies of the Land Use and Housing Elements in order to provide a correlation between land use
and transportation planning. In so doing the General Plan provides the best possible balance
between the City’s future growth, service levels for all travel modes, and community character. The
Circulation Element is consistent with the Complete Streets Act (Assembly Bill 1358), the
Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (Senate Bill 375), the Vehicle Miles
Traveled provisions of Senate Bill 743 (Steinberg, 2013), the Transportation Demand Management
Ordinance, and the Local Coastal Program. DRAFT11
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-3
Context DRAFT
SETTING
Newport Beach is centrally located among the six coastal cities in Orange County. The City of Newport
Beach was incorporated in 1906, only ten years after Henry Ford built his first automobile. The
community has changed along with transportation options from days of the Pacific Electric Red Car
to wide adoption and then reliance on automobiles. Even as freeways came to symbolize Southern
California, no freeways traversed Newport Beach. The Costa Mesa freeway (SR-55) terminates just
north of Newport Beach and the San Joaquin Transportation Corridor (SR-73) skirts the city’s northern
edge. Newport Beach instead relies on regional roadways for connections and transportation including
Coast Highway, Newport Boulevard, Jamboree Road, and MacArthur Boulevard). In the future,
emerging technology and greater access for alternative transportation modes are anticipated to affect
and be affected by Newport Beach as it grows.
Newport Beach is a collection of villages and neighborhoods including Balboa Peninsula, Cannery
Village, the Islands of Newport Harbor, Mariners’ Mile, Newport Heights, Dover Shores, Corona Del
Mar, Newport Coast, Newport Center/Fashion Island, Big Canyon, Back Bay, and Eastbluff. These
neighborhoods rely on local streets for transportation and are connected by regional roadways.
Regional traffic also uses the regional roadways, which has reduced the City’s ability to allocate space
to alternative travel modes. Summertime beach traffic has been a predictable source of traffic volumes
near or exceeding roadway capacity in the beach areas for a century.
Growth in Orange County, and especially communities neighboring Newport Beach will increase
regional through traffic and summertime beach traffic. These increases will occur whether or not
Newport Beach plans for it. This Circulation Element plans for anticipated regional growth and seeks
regional cooperation to accommodate regional traffic growth.
Roads have been the primary means of getting around Newport Beach, but Newport Harbor presents
an opportunity for community specific transportation and recreation alternatives. Water transportation
between Newport Beach and Santa Catalina Island, harbors and ports up and down Southern
California, and between Balboa Island and the Balboa Peninsula is already present. More water
transportation services (public or private) could be established between locations in Newport Beach to
reduce the reliance on roadways.
LOCAL ROADWAY SYSTEM
Local roadways are planned to accommodate traffic circulating the local village or neighborhood they
serve. Keeping regional traffic off of local streets preserves right-of-way for its intended use and for
use by other transportation modes. In recognition of the need to discourage non-local cut-through
traffic from using residential streets, the City Council adopted Policy L-26 (Traffic Management Policy)
in 2006 (amended in 2015 and 2018). This policy provides tools and a process for managing the speed
and volume of vehicles on residential streets and implementing considered responses that do not simply
shift cut-through traffic from one residential street to another. DRAFT12
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-4
ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Much of the traffic traversing Newport Beach uses regional roadways, simply passing through town.
Regional serving roadways are categorized according to the type and quantity of traffic they are
designed to accommodate through the roadway classification system adopted in the City of Newport
Beach Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). The roadway classifications used by the City of
Newport Beach are required to be consistent with the County of Orange Master Plan of Arterial
Highways (MPAH), which is administered by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA).
OCTA is the regional agency responsible for overseeing the regional transportation system and local
agency compliance with regional and statewide programs such as the Congestion Management Program
(CMP). The roadway classifications and their generalized daily capacity, used for long range General
Plan analysis, are presented below. Roadways may be able to carry traffic above the typical capacity
level identified in these basic classifications if the standard section is augmented. Augmented sections
could include additional through lanes, additional turning lanes at intersections with high turning
volumes, or through signal synchronization.
Principal Arterial—A Principal arterial highway is typically an eight-lane divided roadway. A Principal
arterial is designed to accommodate a daily capacity ranging from 45,000 to 60,000. Principal arterials
carry a large volume of regional through traffic not handled by the freeway system.
Major Arterial— A Major arterial highway is typically a six-lane divided roadway. A Major arterial is
designed to accommodate a daily capacity ranging from 30,000 to 45,000. Major arterials carry a large
volume of regional through traffic not handled by the freeway system. A Major Augmented is similar
to a Major arterial, but may include additional lanes, particularly at intersections, resulting in a daily
capacity ranging from 52,000 to 70,000.
Primary Arterial— A Primary arterial highway is usually a four-lane divided roadway. A Primary
arterial is designed to accommodate a daily capacity ranging from 20,000 to 30,000. A Primary arterial’s
function is similar to that of a Principal or Major arterial. The chief difference is capacity. A Primary
Augmented is similar to a Primary arterial, but may include additional lanes, particularly at intersections,
resulting in a daily capacity ranging from 35,000 to 50,000.
Secondary Arterial— A Secondary arterial highway is a four-lane roadway (often undivided). A
Secondary arterial distributes traffic between local streets and Major or Primary arterials. Although
some Secondary arterials serve as through routes, most provide more direct access to surrounding land
uses than Principal, Major, or Primary arterials. Secondary arterials carry a daily capacity ranging from
10,000 to 20,000.
Commuter Roadway—A commuter roadway is a two-to-four-lane, unrestricted access roadway with
a daily capacity ranging from 7,500 to 15,000. It differs from a local street in its ability to handle
through traffic movements between arterials.
ROADWAY OPERATIONS
The efficient operation of the circulation system is constrained by conflict and congestion at
intersections. Intersections that do not perform well can affect roadway conditions upstream and
downstream, impact access to adjacent parcels, increase vehicle collisions, present safety hazards to
other travel modes, and concentrate air pollution. Conflict and congestion are usually the result of
traffic volume. The residents of Newport Beach desire good traffic flow and the ability to get from one
side of the city to the other. However, there are impediments to this. DRAFT13
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-5
In Newport Beach, natural barriers (including the Pacific Ocean, the Santa Ana River, and Upper
Newport Bay) and the John Wayne Airport superblock limit roadway connections. As a result, traffic
volumes are concentrated on the roadways making regional connections (i.e., Coast Highway, Bristol
Street/SR-73, Newport Boulevard, Jamboree Road, and MacArthur Boulevard) which increases
conflict and congestion at intersections along these routes. Because other coastal communities have
similar barriers, regional traffic with no origin or destination in Newport Beach also uses these limited
connections through Newport Beach, further increasing traffic. Summertime beach traffic is not
affected by Newport Beach land use policy. For that reason, it has been and continues to be the practice
of the City to analyze traffic conditions outside of the summer season to determine the function and
operation of City streets.
The Highway Capacity Manual provides methodology for measuring intersection performance in terms
of delay experienced by vehicles traversing the intersection. As detailed below, letter grades are assigned
based on the amount of delay experienced by vehicles during the peak commute hours. Unlike school
grades, however, level of service A is not necessarily a goal. An intersection performing at level of
service A could indicate that too much right-of-way is dedicated to vehicle travel lanes and not enough
right-of-way is dedicated to other travel modes such as bicycles and pedestrians.
■ LOS “A”—Minimal delay (less than 10 seconds on average) is experienced.
■ LOS “B”—Vehicles at signalized intersections experience between 10 and 20 seconds of delay
on average, while vehicles on the side street STOP controlled approaches at unsignalized
intersections experience between 10 and 15 seconds of average delay.
■ LOS “C”—Delays at signalized intersections range from 20 to 35 seconds and from 15 to 25
seconds for side street / STOP controlled traffic at unsignalized intersections.
■ LOS “D”—Delays at signalized intersections range from 35 to 55 seconds and from 25 to 35
seconds for side street / STOP controlled approaches at unsignalized intersections.
■ LOS “E”—Delays at signalized intersections range from 55 to 80 seconds on average, while
delays for side street / STOP controlled traffic at unsignalized intersections range from 35 to 50
seconds.
■ LOS “F”—All vehicles at signalized intersections can be expected to wait through more than a
single signal cycle with average delays in excess of 80 seconds, while delays to side street / STOP
controlled approaches at unsignalized intersections will exceed 50 seconds on average.
The City of Newport Beach has traditionally set LOS D as its goal for intersection performance where
possible. Establishing and maintaining a target requires a balance between goals such as accessibility
for all travel modes congestion, delay, emergency response, community character, and capital
expenditure. It is also important to recognize that some sources of traffic (such as summertime beach
traffic) may expand to use any new capacity provided. In the past, LOS E was established as the goal
in the airport area and at specific intersections in Corona del Mar to achieve the desired balance.
A traffic analysis of the Land Use and Housing Elements is underway that will forecast future traffic
volumes, analyze intersection performance, and identify necessary roadway and intersection
improvements to maintain LOS D. Once those needs are determined, the City of Newport Beach will
consider all goals and may establish LOS E as the standard for some of the City’s intersections. DRAFT14
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-6
Recently, the State has made changes to the measurement of transportation impacts under the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As of July 2020, all jurisdictions must analyze vehicle
miles traveled (VMT) for the purposes of CEQA. While VMT contributes to congestion, by itself it
cannot be used to measure congestion impacts or congestion relief. VMT is a good measure of effects
contributing to climate change. Newport Beach is concerned about climate change and sea level rise
and adopted the Vehicle Miles Traveled Implementation Guide in May 2020 and requires the analysis
of VMT for the purposes of CEQA. However, Newport Beach originally established the Traffic
Phasing Ordinance in 1978, which requires analysis of vehicle LOS when planning transportation
improvements in coordination with land use development. In addition, vehicle LOS analysis is still
required by the Orange County CMP. Therefore, the City of Newport Beach requires the analysis of
VMT for the purposes of CEQA and also requires the analysis of vehicle LOS for compliance with the
Traffic Phasing Ordinance and the CMP.
TRUCK TRAFFIC
Trucks are necessary to deliver goods, collect refuse, and service utilities throughout Newport Beach.
Truck trips can, however, result in noise and other impacts to residents, increase traffic congestion,
and shorten the lifespan of infrastructure. Commercial vehicles weighing in excess of 3 tons (6,000
pounds) are prohibited from certain roadways, when posted. Concentrated periods of high truck traffic,
such as during construction of large development projects, have increased potential for noise,
congestion, and roadway damage impacts. The City of Newport Beach could control and limit those
impacts by reviewing and approving construction management plans for large development projects in
addition to monitoring construction traffic associated with residential projects.
REGIONAL FACILITIES
Many different agencies plan and operate regional transportation facilities that are used by residents of
Newport Beach and vehicles passing through Newport Beach. These include the State, the Southern
California Association of Governments (SCAG), OCTA, the Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA),
and neighboring cities. The County of Orange owns and operates John Wayne Airport, which is a
generator of special use traffic neighboring Newport Beach. The City of Newport Beach coordinates
with outside agencies on matters relevant to the mobility of Newport Beach residents.
The State, through the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), is the owner/operator of
major regional routes used by Newport Beach residents including I-405, SR-55, Newport Boulevard,
and Coast Highway. Coast Highway is owned and operated by Caltrans with the exception of the
segment between Jamboree Road and Newport Coast Drive. Newport Boulevard from Finley Street
to the northerly city limits at Industrial Way is also under Caltrans jurisdiction. Caltrans controls the
signal timing and signal coordination along these roadways. The City of Newport Beach coordinates
with Caltrans related to signal timing and seeks greater coordination related to incorporating emerging
technology and the latest transportation system management techniques.
SCAG is the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for preparing the Regional
Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) for Southern California. The
RTP/SCS is prepared every four years and outlines the region’s vision for use of regional facilities and
delivery of mobility. The City of Newport Beach provides local data for the RTP/SCS process to ensure
Newport Beach is accurately represented and provides feedback on draft strategies. DRAFT15
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-7
As previously mentioned, OCTA is the regional agency responsible for overseeing the regional
transportation system, the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways, and local agency compliance with
regional and statewide programs such as the CMP, which is prepared every two years. The CMP
roadways within Newport Beach are Coast Highway, Newport Boulevard, MacArthur Boulevard, and
Jamboree Road. The City of Newport Beach provides local data for the CMP preparation. OCTA also
prepares a Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) every four years that establishes a vision for
Orange County mobility that is submitted to SCAG for inclusion in the RTP/SCS. The City of
Newport Beach monitors the LRTP and provides feedback related to the needs of Newport Beach
residents. The TCA operates the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor (SR-73). The City of
Newport Beach is a partner in this joint powers authority.
OCTA provides a forum for communication and coordination between neighboring jurisdictions for
the efficient delivery of mobility across jurisdictional borders through regional plans such as the
MPAH, Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan, and OC Go. One example of effective cross-jurisdictional
coordination has been the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program. The City of Newport
Beach coordinates with neighboring jurisdictions seeking effective planning and delivery of
transportation facilities.
JWA is a part of the regional system of airports serving air travel for Orange County residents, workers,
and visitors. The Newport Beach Aviation Committee assists the City in the implementation of Council
Policy A-17 (Newport Beach Council Airport Policy).
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Fixed route bus service and on-demand paratransit in Newport Beach (and all of Orange County) is
operated by OCTA. One of the bus routes in Newport Beach connects the Newport Transportation
Center (located at MacArthur Boulevard and San Joaquin Hills Road in Newport Center) to the
countywide bus network. In order to maintain State mandated revenue/cost balance, OCTA
occasionally revises their service schedule. During periods of increased public transportation use,
service routes are extended and new routes may be added. During periods of decreased public
transportation use, service areas with the lowest ridership are contracted. OCTA’s most recent review
of bus service, the Bus 360 program, concentrated bus service in the central part of Orange County
and reduced bus service in South Orange County and the periphery.
OC Go Project V provides funding for community based transit/circulators. The Newport Beach
summer shuttle service on the Balboa Peninsula is partially funded by Project V. The City of Newport
Beach would consider pilot programs for other shuttle routes, potentially connecting the villages within
Newport Beach.
The extensive use of rideshare services has been one of the factors leading to declining bus ridership.
As part of the Bus 360 program, OCTA even tested use of rideshare operators to provide on-demand
mobility service in lieu of reduced fixed route service. In some markets, rideshare drivers have begun
offering subscription rates for customers with regular medical appointments. The trend is clearly
toward more trips being taken with this travel mode and the City of Newport Beach is considering
ways to accommodate the demand such as designating curbside drop-off zones in commercial areas. DRAFT16
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-8
TRAILS
Trail systems provide functional alternatives to automobile travel and recreational opportunities for the
community. The trail system in Newport Beach has been developed for commuter and recreational
bicyclists, pedestrians, and equestrians.
Bicycle Trails
This Circulation Element incorporates the 2014 City of Newport Beach Bicycle Master Plan and any
future updates to that plan. The Bicycle Master Plan identifies four types of bicycle facilities.
1. Bicycle Path (Caltrans Class I). Provides for bicycle travel on a paved right-of-way separated
from any street or highway. Includes sidewalk adjacent to street.
2. Bicycle Lane (Caltrans Class II). Provides a striped and stenciled lane for bicycle travel on a
street or highway.
3. Bicycle Route (Caltrans Class III). Provides for a shared use with motor vehicle traffic and
may be identified by signing. Stencil markings identifying a recommended position for bicycles
may also be provided.
4. Bicycle Trail. Provides a dirt pathway designated for the use of bicycles and pedestrians
completely separated from motor vehicle traffic.
Subsequent to adoption of the Bicycle Master Plan, Caltrans has included an additional classification
of bicycle facility in the Highway Design Manual and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices. A Class IV Bikeway (also known as a cycle track) is an on-road facility separated from vehicle
traffic by a physical barrier. The City may incorporate this type of facility into the Bicycle Master Plan
in the future.
The facility needs of bicyclists vary with the function of the trip and the speed and skill level of the
rider. Those residents who use bicycles daily for their primary means of transportation likely prefer the
most convenient and direct route available to their destination. These bicyclists normally will select a
route along a primary or a major highway. In contrast, the recreational rider might choose a route for
its scenic interest such as a ride on a bike trail separated from vehicular traffic. New or infrequent
bicycle riders may prefer a route separated from vehicle travel or along a route with low vehicle volume
and speeds. Thus, it is necessary to provide bikeways for bicyclists along major transportation corridors
as well as alternative routes. It is also necessary to provide bikeways which separate faster cyclists from
pedestrian travel and slower cyclists, integrating bicycle travel more closely with vehicular traffic, and
bikeways which separate slower cyclists from motor vehicle traffic.
The City has designated additional off road facilities in the form of sidewalk bikeways, which provide
improved bicycle safety for children within high use corridors in the vicinity of schools, beaches, and
residential neighborhoods. The City will periodically review the Bicycle Sidewalk Resolution to
determine whether areas permitting bicycle use on sidewalks are serving the intended purpose, whether
additional permitted areas are desirable, and whether restrictions on use (e.g., bicycle speed limits) are
warranted. Review of the Bicycle Sidewalk Resolution and strategies for separating faster cyclists from
pedestrians and slower cyclists will become more important due to the emergence of electric-assisted
bicycles (e-bikes).
Researchers have noted the rapid uptake of e-bikes by consumers, that e-bikes are more likely than
standard bicycles to replace car trips, and that trips with e-bikes are longer than trips with standard DRAFT17
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-9
bicycles. The availability of e-bikes also expands the potential group of users of bicycle facilities and
the range of all users of those facilities. This emerging technology may improve the mobility of
Newport Beach residents, but the City would like to ensure that the benefits to some do not come at
the expense of safety to other users and residents.
Pedestrian Corridors
Newport Beach has a variety of pedestrian and multi-use facilities. These include sidewalks through
developed areas, the oceanfront boardwalk on the Balboa Peninsula, bayfront walkways, and trails
along Upper Newport Bay and in open space areas. Coastal areas see high pedestrian activity including
Balboa Island, Balboa Peninsula, Corona del Mar, and Mariners’ Mile. High volumes of pedestrians
cross Coast Highway through Mariners’ Mile. Where there are opportunities, the City of Newport
Beach will consider providing more Bayfront walkways along the Balboa Peninsula and Mariners’ Mile.
These walkways will help to accommodate high pedestrian volumes while also providing an alternative
network separate from high vehicle volume streets. Closing low volume minor streets and alleys and
creating pedestrian promenades or activity areas can also be a strategy to create a pedestrian friendly
network while activating a business district. In addition, overhead pedestrian crossings should be
considered to improve pedestrian safety.
Equestrian Trails
Equestrian trails are primarily located in the Santa Ana Heights portion of the City. These trails, and
other equestrian facilities, are highly valued by residents of this area and provide regional recreation
opportunities as well.
COMPLETE STREETS
While alternative modes such as bicycles have always been permitted to use the roadway network, the
Complete Streets Act (Assembly Bill 1358) requires that Circulation Elements “plan for a balanced
multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of streets, roads, and highways,
defined to include motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, children, persons with disabilities, seniors, movers
of commercial goods, and users of public transportation, in a manner that is suitable to the rural,
suburban, or urban context of the general plan.” Providing a balance for multiple modes is one strategy
toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions and combating climate change consistent with the City’s
goals of reducing risks to residents from climate change and sea level rise. Additionally, research shows
that a multimodal transportation system, encouraging choice of bicycle walking and rolling modes, can
enhance local economic development and improve public health. The City of Newport Beach uses the
Orange County Council of Governments (OCCOG) Complete Streets Initiative Design Handbook to
implement the City’s complete streets vision.
Planning for a balanced multimodal transportation network does not mean that every street allocates
equal space to all travel modes. In fact, satisfactory service levels are difficult to provide on all streets
for all travel modes due to the competing interests between modes. Automobile friendly streets have
high travel speeds, wide lanes, and separate turn lanes all of which decrease pedestrian service levels.
Rather than trying to simultaneously serve competing needs, the City of Newport Beach favors a
layered network approach to complete streets planning. In a layered network, a street is prioritized for
a particular travel mode (or multiple travel modes benefiting from similar characteristics) but the
network as a whole provides for the mobility of all users of roadways. DRAFT18
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-10
EMERGING TECHNOLOGY
The City of Newport Beach has used and continues to use technology to improve the delivery and
performance of mobility. Transportation System Management techniques have been used to enhance
capacity without physical roadway widening while retaining the community character and limiting the
impact of the roadway system on the environment. Examples of Transportation System Management
improvements include intelligent transportation system improvements at traffic signals, traffic signal
coordination and improvements to roadway signage along busy routes (especially to tourist
destinations), and the completion of the traffic management center in City Hall allowing for traffic
monitoring and remote signal operation. The City also replaced old street lighting to more efficient
LED fixtures to reduce electricity consumption and the City’s carbon footprint.
Technology is changing rapidly and the City of Newport Beach will respond to the challenges and
opportunities presented by emerging technology. The number of electric vehicles (EV) using our
roadways will continue to grow and have fueling needs that are distinct from gasoline powered vehicles.
Rideshare services continue to grow ridership and simultaneously the need for designated places to
drop-off and pick-up are growing. Wayfinding apps help people to navigate our roadways, but the
directions provided do not always show the most direct route or respect roadway classification.
Traditional engineering techniques may not be effective in redirecting this source of traffic volume and
the City of Newport Beach is investigating potential strategies.
Vehicles with limited self-driving capability are already on our roadways. On the horizon, the City
anticipates that vehicle-to-everything (V2X) infrastructure improvements will be needed to
accommodate and realize the advantages offered by connected and autonomous vehicles. Potential
advantages from connected vehicles include feedback regarding roadway maintenance needs, uniform
traffic flows, real time signal synchronization, improved safety for drivers and other travel modes, and
reduced GHG emissions. While the City of Newport Beach is aware of what is happening now and
what is anticipated in the near future, the City must remain flexible and adapt to rapidly changing
transportation options in order to experience the benefits offered while avoiding the pitfalls of change.
The City of Newport Beach retains the Travel Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance requiring
projects to reduce the number of peak-period vehicle trips by providing facilities to support alternate
modes and encouraging the use of alternative transportation modes, such as carpools, vanpools, public
transit, bicycles, and walking. Employers can also offer flexible work schedules, including work-from-
home. All of these techniques are enhanced by emerging technologies. Adopting TDM measures not
only reduces peak-period vehicle trips and associated GHG emissions, but could also reduce parking
demand.
CLIMATE CHANGE
Newport Beach is concerned about climate change and sea level rise. As seen in other parts of the
country, climate change can increase the frequency and intensity of natural emergencies. The City of
Newport Beach is planning for these contingencies using tsunami warning signs, evacuation planning
and battery back-up systems for traffic signals. Initiatives included in the Circulation Element such as
planning for a balanced multimodal network including support for additional transit facilities in higher
density areas and measures to reduce VMT help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat
climate change. The City of Newport Beach intends to do more to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
and combat climate change. On City property, the City can provide more EV charging stations, bicycle DRAFT19
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-11
parking, and other supporting facilities. The City can encourage or require these supporting facilities
on privately owned property within Newport Beach. The City can also encourage local businesses to
establish and maintain telework programs in addition to carpooling/vanpooling.
PARKING
Similar to other coastal communities, parking availability is limited citywide, especially in some areas
during the peak summer months. Areas of Newport Beach that were largely subdivided prior to
widespread adoption of the automobile are areas of particular concern (i.e., Balboa Peninsula, Balboa
Island, and Corona Del Mar). The Balboa Village Parking Management Overlay Plan included
recommendations. The City of Newport Beach has implemented some of the recommendations (i.e.,
beginning to implement parking meter time limits, providing bus layover areas, improving intersection
visibility with additional red curbing, and monitoring lot utilization). Implementing additional
recommendations is being considered including increasing parking meter fees, consolidating public
parking, and initiating a shared parking program. Similar Parking Management Overlay plans could be
implemented in other activity areas including Corona del Mar, Mariners’ Mile, McFadden Wharf,
Cannery Village, and Balboa Island.
Technology changes make other innovative solutions possible. The City of Newport Beach uses a
smartphone app to allow remote payment of fees at parking meters, which has increased compliance.
This program could be expanded to provide the location of and directions to available parking spaces,
which could reduce circling while looking for a parking space and the congestion those movements
cause. Increased use of rideshare services may reduce parking demand for some land uses or in some
areas of Newport Beach. Future review of off-street parking requirements may allow reuse of vehicle
parking spaces for bicycle parking or could permit reallocation of curbside space. Alternatives for
management of curbside space include valet or rideshare pick-up/drop-off and deliveries, further
supporting a trend toward less private vehicle parking.
TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
Newport Beach receives funding for transportation improvements from gasoline tax apportionment
(including SB-1), OC Go (also known as Measure M) local turnback, OC Go competitive programs,
the State, federal funds, developer fees (i.e., the Traffic Phasing Ordinance and Fair Share Traffic
Contribution Ordinance), and the General Fund. The City of Newport Beach leverages City resources
to improve the chances of winning competitive funding sources (e.g., MacArthur Boulevard
improvements, Superior Avenue pedestrian bridge, and more). The effect of revisions to CEQA
measuring transportation impacts in terms of VMT on developer fees is not known at this time. A
regional VMT mitigation program, if established, may offer a new funding source for public transit or
alternative transportation projects.
The City of Newport Beach will have additional expenditures in the future to adapt existing
infrastructure with emerging technology, including traffic signal improvements for compatibility with
connected and autonomous vehicles. The City of Newport Beach is considering potential sources of
funding for these expenditures. DRAFT20
7-12 N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Goals and Policies DRAFT
Goa l
CE 1.1
An overall transportation system that facilitates the movement of people and goods within and through
the City of Newport Beach and accommodates conservative growth within the City of Newport Beach,
but is not expanded primarily to accommodate growth in the surrounding region.
Policies
CE 1.1.1 Comprehensive Transportation System
Provide a diverse transportation system that provides mobility options for the
community. (Imp 16.8, 16.11)
CE 1.1.2 Integrated System of Multiple Modes
Provide an integrated transportation system that supports the land use plan set
forth in the Land Use Element. (Imp 2.1)
CE 1.1.3 Levels of Service Related to Community Character
Establish Maintain level of service standards that reflect the character of the
various unique districts and neighborhoods of Newport Beach. (Imp 16.2, 16.4,
16.6, 16.7)
CE 1.1.X Circulation Complete Streets System for All Users
Develop a Complete Streets master plan and design guide based upon best
practices (e.g., Orange County Council of Governments Complete Streets
Initiative Design Handbook, 2016) that prioritizes City rights of way to allow all
users safe and efficient mobility. Pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit
riders of all ages and abilities are able to safely move along and across the
mobility system of Newport Beach.
Goa l
CE 1.2
Reduced summertime visitor traffic impacts.
Policies
CE 1.2.1 Wayfinding
Implement way-finding signs for vehicles and pedestrians, especially specifically for
tourist destination areas. (Imp 16.7)
Mobility DRAFT21
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-13
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
CE 1.2.2 Shuttle Service
Encourage and maintain remote visitor parking and shuttle services. (Imp 14.4)
CE 1.2.X Internal Shuttle
Study the potential of implementing a pilot program, for a shuttle system
connecting the villages of Newport Beach.
CE 1.2.3 Traffic System Management
Identify andContinue to implement measures, such as special traffic signal timing,
to reduce the impact of high volume summer traffic on persons living along and
around the beach and bay, as well as visitors. (Imp 16.7)
CE 1.2.4 Public Transit
Support and encourage OCTA efforts to provide / fund summertime
expanded bus service and/or local shuttle services to reduce visitor traffic.
(Imp 16.8)
Goa l
CE 1.3
Truck routes that support goods movement to and from land use in the City while minimizing
adverse impacts to residents or businesses.
Policies
CE 1.3.1 Truck Routes
Allow truck use of City streets except selected residential and arterial streets
adjacent to residential areas and school zones necessary to minimize impacts
of truck traffic on residential areas. (Imp 16.9)
CE 1.3.2 Impacts of Trucks
Provide appropriately designed and maintained roadways to safely
accommodate truck travel and minimize noise and vibration. (Imp 16.9)
CE 1.3.3 Management of Truck Activities
Actively manage trucking activities related to oversize loads such as large
boats and comparable characteristics. (Imp 16.9)
CE 1.3.X Construction Management Plans
Develop program to require CMP for large developments to address haul
routes, hours of operation, and number of truck trips.DRAFT22
7-14 N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Roadway System
Goa l
CE 2.1
A roadway system with no significant gaps that provides for the efficient movement of goods and
people in the City of Newport Beach, while maintaining the community’s character and its
residents’ quality of life.
Policies
CE 2.1.1 Level of Service Standards
Plan the arterial roadway system to accommodate projected traffic at the
following level of service standards:
A. Level of Service (LOS) “D” throughout the City, unless otherwise noted
B. LOS “E” at any intersection in the Airport Area shared with Irvine and Corona del
Mar (subject to findings of Circulation Element traffic study)
C. LOS “E” at Coast Highway (EW) and Dover Drive (NS) due to right-
of-way limitations
D. LOS “E” at Marguerite Avenue (NS) and Coast Highway (EW) in the
pedestrian oriented area of Corona del Mar
E. LOS “E” at Goldenrod Avenue (NS) and Coast Highway (EW) in the
pedestrian oriented area of in Corona del Mar (Imp 16.3)
CE 2.1.2 Street and Highway Network
Construct the circulation system described on the map entitled Newport Beach
Circulation Element-Master Plan of Streets and Highways shown in Figure CE1
and Figure CE2 (cross-section). (Imp 14.9, 16.3)
CE 2.1.3 Current Traffic Data
Monitor traffic conditions on an ongoing basis and update Master Plan as
necessary. (Imp 16.4)
CE 2.1.4 Roadway Improvements
Pursue construction of intersection improvements shown on Figure CE3(subject
to findings of the Circulation Element traffic study) or alternate improvements
that achieve an acceptable level of service. (Imp 16.3)
CE 2.1.5 MacArthur Boulevard Widening
Plan the addition of lanes to MacArthur Boulevard between Harbor View Drive
and the prolongation of Crown Drive so that more than four lanes are constructed
only when the daily volume to capacity ratio equals or exceeds 1.0 in that section
of MacArthur Boulevard, not counting trips generated by the MacArthur
Boulevard access drive to Corona del mar Plaza, and after public hearings before DRAFT23
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-15
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
the Planning Commission and City Council, and only by narrowing the median.
(Imp 16.3)
CE 2.1.6 Protection of Right-of-Way
Protect right-of-way for designated future streets and highways through all
practicable means. (Imp 2.1)
Goa l
CE 2.2
A safe and efficient roadway system.
Policies
CE 2.2.1 Safe Roadways
Provide for safe roadway conditions by adhering to nationally recognized
improvement standards and uniform construction and maintenance practices.
(Imp 16.4, 16.6)
CE 2.2.X Safe System Approach
Review best practices for safe circulation systems and implement appropriate
technologies/infrastructure consistent with the industry recognized Safe System
approach. Incorporate traffic safety improvement projects in the annual Capital
Improvement Program.
CE 2.2.2 Up-to-Date Standards
Periodically review and update street standards to current multimodal
capacity and safety practices. (Imp 16.4, 16.6)
CE 2.2.3 Traffic Control
Design traffic control measures to ensure City streets and roads function with
safety and efficiency for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. (Imp 16.7)
CE 2.2.4 Driveway and Access Limitations
Limit driveway and local street access on arterial streets to maintain a desired
quality of traffic flow and limit hazards to active transportation modes.
Wherever possible, consolidate and/or reduce the number of driveways and
implement access controls during redevelopment of adjacent parcels. (Imp
16.1)
CE 2.2.5 Neighborhood Traffic Calming
Balance safety, quality of life, and efficiency when considering cut-through
traffic and traffic calming improvements to local neighborhood streets.
Address neighborhood traffic concerns through City Council Policy L-26.
(Imp 16.6)
DRAFT24
7-16 N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
CE 2.2.6 Emergency Access
Provide all residential, commercial, and industrial areas with efficient and safe
access for emergency vehicles and provide signage for emergency evacuation
routes. (Imp 16.6)
CE 2.2.7 Alleys
Alleys in new developments shall be 20’ wide to facilitate circulation. (Imp 8.1)
Goa l
CE 2.3
Optimal roadway system operation.
Policies
CE 2.3.1 Coast Highway Ownership
Pursue ownership of Coast Highway throughout Newport Beach, as
opportunities arise, so that Coast Highway can be improved to its ultimate
width in Mariners’ Mile consistent with the City’s vision Master Plan of
Streets and Highways and the OCTA Master Plan of Arterial Highways and
to provide the City with more opportunities to increase operational
efficiencies. (Imp 2.1, 14.9)
CE 2.3.2 Roadway Maintenance
Support roadway maintenance programs that inspect, repair, and rehabilitate
pavement surfaces and sidewalks in order to preserve the high quality of City
streets and thoroughfares. (Imp 16.4)
CE 2.3.X New Development Maintenance Responsibility
Ensure minimization of traffic congestion impacts, parking impacts, and
noise impacts and ensure proper roadway maintenance through review and
approval of Construction Management Plans associated with new
development proposals in residential neighborhoods.
CE 2.3.3 Traffic Conditions Data Base
Monitor traffic conditions and optimize traffic signal operations and coordination
on an ongoing basis. (Imp 16.2)
CE 2.3.4 Improvements to Reflect Changing Traffic Conditions
Based on the monitoring of traffic conditions, consider additional improvements
in areas with operations issues, such as intersections with heavy turn volumes (e.g.
additional turn lanes, traffic signal progression, etc.). (Imp 16.2)
DRAFT25
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-17
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Regional Transportation
Goa l
CE 3.1
A network of regional facilities which ensures the safe and efficient movement of people and goods
from within the City to areas outside its boundaries, and minimizes the use of City streets by regional
through traffic.
Policies
CE 3.1.1 Freeway System
Encourage ongoing regional investment in the freeway system. (Imp 14.1, 14.3, 14.9,
14.10)
CE 3.1.2 Integration of Transportation Systems with Adjoining Communities and
the Region
Interface with regional and surrounding local agencies, such as Caltrans, OCTA,
the County of Orange, John Wayne Airport, the Cities of Irvine, Costa Mesa, and
Huntington Beach, and the University of California, Irvine to implement systems
that serve the needs of regional travelers (vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians) in a
way that minimizes impacts on Newport Beach residents. (Imp 14.9, 14.10, 16.5)
CE 3.1.X Traffic from Adjoining Communities
The City of Newport Beach shall continue to monitor land development applications
in adjacent communities and encourage coordination on land development projects
that affect traffic and mobility in Newport Beach.
CE 3.1.3 Regional Consistency
The City of Newport Beach Master Plan of Streets and Highways (shown on
Figure CE1) shall be consistent with the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial
Highways. (Imp 16.5)
CE 3.1.4 Regional Traffic Mitigation
Continue to Pparticipate in programs (Orange County Congestion Management
Program, Growth Management ProgramSouthern California Association of
Governments Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy,
etc.) to mitigate reduce regional traffic congestion. (Imp 14.1, 14.3, 16.5)
CE 3.1.5 19th Street BridgeSanta Ana River Future Mobility Alternatives
Advocate for the implementation of needed study and review of regional
Master Plan transportation improvements, and be a strong advocate for
construction of the 19th Street Bridge along and/or across the Santa Ana
River, or alternative improvements that achieve the same improvements in DRAFT26
7-18 N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
regional traffic flow,such as active transportation or electric vehicle
improvements that reduce passenger car use, offer mobility choice, enhance
recreation and community health and reduce vehicle miles traveled without
disproportionate impacts on Newport Beach including Coast Highway,
consistent with all environmental review requirements. (Imp 16.5) DRAFT27
Circulation Element
Newport Beach General Plan 7-19
N N
Public Transportation
Goa l
CE 4.1
A public transportation system that provides mobility for residents and encourages use of public
transportation as an alternative to automobile travel.
Policies
CE 4.1.1 Public Transit Efficiency
Support efforts by OCTA and other agencies to increase the effectiveness
and productivity of transit services, possibly including local shuttle services.
(Imp 14.4)
CE 4.1.2 Transit Services for Special Need Populations
Support efforts to increase accessible transit services and facilities for the
elderly, disabled, and other transportation disadvantaged persons. (Imp 16.8)
CE 4.1.3 Seasonal Public Transit
Coordinate with OCTA to provide seasonal, recreational, and special events
shuttles. (Imp 14.4, 16.8)
CE 4.1.4 Land Use Densities Supporting Public Transit
Accommodate residential densities sufficient to support transit patronage,
especially in mixed use areas such as the Airport Area. (Imp 2.1)
CE 4.1.5 John Wayne Airport Shuttles
Encourage the use of airport shuttle services to minimize the impacts of air
travelers on the local roadway system. (Imp 14.4, 16.8)
CE 4.1.6 Transit Support Facilities
Participate Cooperate with OCTA in efforts to provide additional develop
regional transit support facilities, including park-and-ride lots, bus stops, and
shelters in higher density residential areas or mixed-use development areas to
reduce passenger car travel through and within Newport Beach. (Imp 16.8)
CE 4.1.7 School Transit
Monitor the demand for additional private, public, and school transportation
available to serve the needs of K–12 students and advocate for improvements in
traffic from students. (Imp 14.2, 16.11)
DRAFT28
Circulation Eleme n t
7-20 Newport Beach General Plan
Alternative Transportation Modes
Goa l
CE 5.1
Convenient trail systems that satisfy recreational desires and transportation needs.
Policies
CE 5.1.A Bicycle Master Plan Vision
Provide for a network of active transportation facilities consistent with the vision in
the current Newport Beach Bicycle Master Plan.
CE 5.1.B Bicycle Network Implementation
Review and program discrete active transportation projects outlined in the current
Newport Beach Bicycle Master Plan in the annual Capital Improvement Program.
CE 5.1.1 Trail System
Promote construction of a comprehensive trail system as shown on Figure CE4 to
connect bicycle trails with hiking trails and transit routes. (Possible revisionsUpdated
figure in process)
(Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.2 Pedestrian Travel Mode Connectivity
Ensure all active transportation networks are linked and provide connectivity
between transit, transit centers, and other major land uses such as village areas,
commercial centers, activity nodes, recreation facilities, schools, parks, and
institutionsLink residential areas, schools, parks, and commercial centers so that
residents can travel within the community without driving. (Imp 16.11, 20.1)
CE 5.1.3 Pedestrian Improvements in New Development Projects
Require new development projects to include safe and attractive sidewalks,
walkways, and bike lanes in accordance with the Master Plan, and, if feasible,
trails. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.4 Linkages to Citywide Trail System and Neighborhoods
Require developers to construct links to the planned trail system, adjacent
areas, and communities where appropriate. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.5 Bikeway System
Cooperate with state, federal, county, and local agencies to coordinate
bikeways and trails throughout the region. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.6 Bicycle Supporting Facilities
Incorporate separate bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the design plans for
new streets and highways and, where feasible, in the plans for improving DRAFT29
Circulation Element
Newport Beach General Plan 7-21
existing roads. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.X Bicycle Supporting Facilities
Require bicycle facilities such as bike racks, bike stations, or lockers according
to national standards for long-term and short-term bicycle utilization on City
property and with new development and encourage the addition of such
bicycle facilities within existing development.
CE 5.1.7 Bicycle Safety
Provide for safety of bicyclists, equestrians, and pedestrians by adhering to
current national standards and uniform practices. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.8 Bicycle Conflicts with Vehicles and Pedestrians
Minimize conflict points among motorized traffic, pedestrians, e-bikes, and
conventional bicycle traffic. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.9 Integrated Bicycle Improvements
Coordinate community bicycle and pedestrian facilities in a citywide network
for continuity of travel. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.10 Bicycle Trail Signage
Develop and implement a uniform signing program to assist the public in
locating, recognizing, and utilizing public bikeways and trails. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.11 School Access
Work with schools to promote walking, biking, safe drop-off, and other
improvements. (Imp 14.2, 16.11)
CE 5.1.12 Pedestrian Street Crossings
Continue to Iimplement improved pedestrian crossings in key high volume
areas such as Corona Del Mar, Mariners’ Mile, West Newport, Airport Area,
Newport Center/Fashion Island, and the Balboa Peninsula. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.13 Overhead Pedestrian Street Crossings
Consider overhead pedestrian crossings in areas where pedestrian use limits the
efficiency of the roadway or signalized intersection and/or where an overhead
crossing provides for improved pedestrian safety. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.14 Newport Harbor Trails and Walkways
Develop and implement a long-range plan for public trails and walkways to access
all appropriate commercial areas of the harbor, as determined to be physically and
economically feasible including the following:
a. Extension of the Lido Marina Village boardwalk across all of the waterfront
commercial properties in Lido Village
b. Provide a continuous waterfront walkway along the Rhine Channel,
connecting Cannery Village and McFadden Square waterfront commercial areas
with Las Arenas Beach at 19th Street DRAFT30
Circulation Eleme n t
7-22 Newport Beach General Plan
c. Provide a walkway connecting the Lido Village area with Mariners’ Mile
d. Provide a continuous walkway along the Mariners’ Mile waterfront from the
Coast Highway/Newport Boulevard Bridge to the Balboa Bay Club (Policy HB
6.2) (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.15 Equestrian Trails
Maintain the existing equestrian trail system in Santa Ana Heights (Figure CE5).
(Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.16 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety
Provide for the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians through provision of adequate
facilities, including review of locations where sidewalk use by bicyclists is
appropriate, consideration of separate facilities for e-bikes or other semi-
motorized modes, and maintenance and construction of extra sidewalk width
where feasible. (Imp 16.11)
Goa l
CE 5.2
Enhanced and maintained public water transportation services and expanded public water
transportation uses and land support facilities. (Policy HB 6.5)
Policies
CE 5.2.1 Marine Terminals
Coordinate the location of marine terminals with other components of the
transportation system to ensure convenient multi-modal access and adequate
parking. (Policy HB 6.6) (Imp 16.12)
CE 5.2.2 Expanded Water Transportation Modes
Promote opportunities to expand water transportation modes, such as water
based shuttle services and water taxis. (Policy HB 6.7) (Imp 16.12) DRAFT31
Circulation Element
Newport Beach General Plan 7-23
Transportation Systems Management (TSM)/Travel Demand Management (TDM)
Emerging Technology
Goa l
CE 6.1
An efficient circulation system through the use of transportation systems management.
Policies
CE 6.1.1 Traffic Signals
Improve traffic signal operations by optimizing signal timing, interconnecting
signalized intersections along arterial streets, and installing computerized
master traffic signal control systems in intensively utilized areas. (Imp 16.7)
CE 6.1.2 Intelligent Transportation Systems
Explore and implement intelligent transportation system and infrastructure
improvements which will reduce peak hour trafficimprove circulation system
performance from that forecast in this Element. (Imp16.4, 16.7
CE 6.1.3 Coordination with Adjacent Jurisdictions
Coordinate operations with adjacent jurisdictions to enhance the efficiency
of inter-jurisdictional roadway system operations. (Imp 14.1, 14.3)
CE 6.1.X1 Rideshare Vehicles
Monitor the volume and proliferation of on demand rideshare services (e.g.,
Uber and Lyft) and respond with appropriate level of design guidance and
regulation of curb side uses (including loading zone) and parking lot
utilization.
CE 6.1.X2 Autonomous, Connected, and Future Vehicle Technology
Monitor the development of new vehicle technology and associated
community based infrastructure. Plan for the deployment of new vehicle
technology through annual budgeting process and capital improvement
programming process.
CE 6.1.X3 Wayfinding Technology
Monitor and communicate with wayfinding technology providers (e.g., Waze
and Google Maps) to reduce routing of traffic through neighborhoods.
CE 6.1.X4 Parking Technology
Consider deployment of parking app technology that identifies available
parking spaces and reduces vehicle circulation and congestion related to
searching for parking spaces. DRAFT32
Circulation Eleme n t
7-24 Newport Beach General Plan
Climate Change
Goa l
CE 6.2
Promote strategies to reduce the use of internal combustion passenger cars and the attendant greenhouse
gas emissions.
Policies
CE 6.2.X1 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
Follow the analysis methodology for vehicle miles traveled according to the
Newport Beach VMT thresholds policy and as required in Senate Bill 743 and
the revised California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
CE 6.2.X2 VMT Mitigation Measures
Require implementation of CEQA project related VMT mitigation measures
when warranted and monitor reductions in VMT from new development.
CE 6.2.X3 Regional VMT Mitigation Measures
Promote the development of regional VMT mitigation in order to simplify
the CEQA process and enhance the effectiveness of VMT and GHG
reduction strategies.
CE 6.2.1 Alternative Transportation Modes and Practices
Promote and encourage the use of alternative transportation modes, such as
ridesharing, carpools, vanpools, public transit, bicycles, and walking, and
telecommuting programs; and provide facilities that support such alternate
modes. (Imp 16.8, 16.11) through the planning and development of a Complete
Streets master plan and design guide.
CE 6.2.2 Support Facilities for Alternative Modes
Require new development projects to provide facilities commensurate with
development type and intensity to support alternative modes, such as preferential
parking for carpools, bike racks, bike stations, bicycle lockers, showers, commuter
information areas, rideshare vehicle loading areas, water transportation docks, and
bus stop improvements. (Imp 16.8, 16.11)
CE 6.2.X4 Public Right of Way Curbside Management
Review areas with commercial uses (such as retail, restaurant, and hospitality) to
incorporate strategies to accommodate novel use of curb side right of way to
reduce passenger car use through drop-off or valet and accommodate rideshare
as well as delivery activities where appropriate.
DRAFT33
Circulation Element
Newport Beach General Plan 7-25
CE 6.2.3 Project Site Design Supporting Alternative Modes
Encourage increased use of public transportation by requiring project site designs
that facilitate the use of public transportation and walking. (Imp 16.8, 16.11)
CE 6.2.X5 Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Stations
Install additional EV charging stations on City properties, support existing private
development to add new EV charging stations, and require EV charging stations
be installed as part of new development.DRAFT34
Parking
Goa l
CE 7.1
An adequate supply of convenient parking throughout the City.
Policies
CE 7.1.1 Required Parking
Require that new development provide adequate, convenient parking for
residents, guests, business patrons, and visitors. (Imp 16.10)
CE 7.1.X1 Parking Considerations of Rideshare Vehicles
Develop parking demand statistics that consider the efficiency of rideshare services
and the potential for reduction in parking requirements.
CE 7.1.2 Parking In-Lieu Fees
Establish an in-lieu parking fee that the City may require to be paid when a
development is not able to provide required parking. (Imp 16.10)
CE 7.1.3 Funding of Shared Parking Facilities
Use in-lieu fees and other funds to develop public shared parking facilities in areas
with inadequate parking supply. Priority shall be given to spending fees in areas
that will benefit those who contributed the fees. (Imp 16.10)
CE 7.1.4 Expanded Parking in Corona del Mar
Permit conversion of Corona Del Mar residential lots adjacent to commercial
areas and commercial lots for parking to support commercial uses. Encourage
continued use of existing parking on residential zoned lots, as well as existing
shared parking lots. (Imp 2.1, 8.1, 8.2, 24.1)
CE 7.1.X2 Parking Consolidation
Evaluate the potential to consolidate underutilized parcels to create parking
districts and to construct areawide parking hubs potentially relieving
individual parcels of some of their parking requirements.
CE 7.1.5 Avon Street Municipal Parking Lot Relocation
Consider relocation of the Avon Street municipal lot to better serve
commercial uses in Mariners’ Mile. (Imp 2.1, 16.10)
CE 7.1.6 Public Use of Private Parking Facilities
Encourage the use of commercial, office, and institutional parking areas for
use as public parking to serve coastal recreational areas during weekends and
holidays, in conjunction with public transit or shuttles where appropriate. (Imp
8.1, 8.2, 16.10)
DRAFT35
Circulation Element
Newport Beach General Plan 7-27
CE 7.1.7 Shared Parking Facilities
Consider allowing shared parking in mixed use and pedestrian oriented areas
throughout the City. (Imp 2.1, 8.1, 8.2, 16.10)
CE 7.1.8 Parking Configuration
Site and design new development to avoid use of parking configurations or
management programs that are difficult to maintain and enforce. (Imp 2.1, 7.1,
8.1)
CE 7.1.9 Parking Requirements for Pedestrian-Oriented and Local-Serving Uses
Consider revised parking requirements for small scale neighborhood serving
commercial uses in areas that derive most of their trade from walk-in
business, especially where on-street or other public parking is available. (Imp
2.1, 8.1, 8.2)
CE 7.1.10 Parking for Marine Recreational Users
Provide adequate parking as necessary in the vicinity of visitor serving marine
uses, including marinas, water transportation terminals, boat ramps, as well as
parking suitable for service vehicles in commercial marinas and berthing
areas. (Imp 16.12)
CE 7.1.11 Curb Cuts
Require new development to minimize curb cuts to protect on-street parking
spaces. Close curb cuts to create on street parking spaces wherever feasible.
(Imp 2.1, 7.1, 8.1)
CE 7.1.12 Alley Access
Require alley access to parking areas for all new development in areas where
alley access exists. (Imp 2.1, 8.1)
CE 7.1.13 Up-to-Date Parking Requirements
Periodically review and update off-street parking requirements in the Municipal
Code Section to account for changes in technology and commuter behavior and
ensure that new development provides off-street parking sufficient to serve
approved uses. (Imp 8.1, 8.2)
Goa l
CE 7.2
An efficiently operated parking system.
Policies
CE 7.2.1 Parking Management
Develop parking management programs for areas with inadequate parking. (Imp
16.10)
DRAFT36
CE 7.2.X1 Parking Technology
Support the development of new technologies, including parking related apps to
promote wayfinding, parking availability, and parking fee collections in an efficient
manner.
CE 7.2.X2 Parking Pricing
Periodically review and update parking fees and rates at on-street locations and
off-street parking lots operated by the City.
CE 7.2.2 Parking Signage
Provide improved parking information and signage. (Imp 16.10)
CE 7.2.3 Shared Valet Service
Explore the feasibility of shared valet parking programs in areas with high parking
demand and less conveniently located parking facilities, such as Mariners’ Mile and
McFadden Square. (Imp 16.10)
DRAFT37
Circulation Element
Newport Beach General Plan 7-29
Transportation Funding
Goa l
CE 8.1
Adequate funding for needed transportation infrastructure and operations including support of measures
for outside funding of transportation improvements.
Policies
CE 8.1.1 Transportation User and Benefit Fees
Support legislation to increase transportation user and benefit fees, and to index
such fees to keep pace with inflation, in order to provide the additional revenues
for needed transportation facilities and services. (Imp 7.3)
CE 8.1.2 State Highway Revenues
Support legislation to increase state highway revenues as needed to maintain and
rehabilitate the existing state highway system and to match all available federal
highway funding. (Imp 14.9)
CE 8.1.3 Innovative Transportation Funding
Support the evaluation and implementation of innovative transportation
financing mechanisms such as local tax increment districts, benefit
assessment districts, and joint development and use of transportation centers.
(Imp 31.1)
CE 8.1.4 Local Street and Highway Revenues
Support measures to increase local street and highway revenues as needed to
fund all road reconstruction, operation, and maintenance cost. (Imp 7.3, 20.1)
CE 8.1.5 Comprehensive Funding Program
Support measures to develop and implement a continuing funding program,
including private sector participation and an equitable fare structure, to fund
the construction, operation, and maintenance of transit facilities and services.
(Imp 7.2, 7.3, 20.1)
CE 8.1.6 Annual Budgeting for Improvements
Annually review and consider budgeting for projects contributing to
completion of the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. (Imp 7.3, 30.1)
CE 8.1.7 Fair Share Fee Ordinance
Periodically review the Fair Share Fee Ordinance, reassess the unfunded cost
of required improvements, and adjust the required Fair Share Fees as
appropriate. (Imp 7.2)
DRAFT38
CE 8.1.8 Roadway Improvements Funding
Fund costs of major roadway facility and intersection improvements through
gas tax revenues, federal, state, and county grants, and City ordinances to
avoid burdening the General Fund to the extent that this is possible. (Imp 7.2,
7.3, 30.2)
CE 8.1.9 Right-of-Way Dedication
Require the dedication of needed right-of-way in conjunction with approval
of subdivision maps or other discretionary approvals. (Imp 1.1)
CE 8.1.10 Development Requirements
Require development to provide the needed roadway improvements adjacent
to a site, commensurate with project impact and in accordance with the
Master Plan of Streets and Highways. (Imp 16.3)
CE 8.1.11 Joint Funding with Adjoining Jurisdictions
Pursue joint funding of improvements in areas (such as the Airport Area)
where traffic growth and/or needed improvements are demonstrably based
upon traffic contributions or improvements that are a joint responsibility of
Newport Beach and one or more adjacent jurisdictions/agencies. (Imp 14.1)
CE 8.1.12 Measure M Restrictions
Measure M sales tax revenues shall not be used to replace private developer
funding that has been committed for any project or normal subdivision
obligations. (Imp 16.2)
CE 8.1.13 Transportation Improvement or Special Assessment District
Establish a transportation improvement or special assessment district to fund
improvements needed in the Airport Area. (Imp 31.1)
DRAFT39
From:dave@earsi.com
To:Planning Commissioners; Jurjis, Seimone; Avery, Brad; Campbell, Jim
Subject:Draft Circulation Elements Update - Comments
Date:Tuesday, March 16, 2021 3:25:04 PM
Attachments:Draft Circulation Element Update Comments 3-16-21.pdf
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe.
Hi,
Attached are my comments/recommendations following review of the Draft Circulation Element
Updates
Cheers,
Dave
David J. Tanner
223 62nd Street
Newport Beach, CA 92663
949 646-8958 home
949 233-0895 cell
Notice of Confidentiality:
This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the address(s) named herein
and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please notify me by e-mail by replying to this message and permanently delete the original
and any copy of any email and any printout thereof.
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4a Additional Materials Received Draft Circulation Element Update
Draft Circulation Element Text
Comments, March 16, 2021
David Tanner Page 1 of 6
General
Top Priorities
Satisfying the state mandated housing requirement is the predominant factor driving the direction of the
Housing Element/General Plan update. The City has chosen to proceed with the Housing Element and
Circulation Element updates first, followed by the Land Use other and remaining Elements. In updating the
Housing and Circulation Elements the City needs to incorporate additional mandates beyond accommodating
RHNA. The direction the Country is going, is to reduce GHG emissions to reduce mankind’s impact on climate
change. To become carbon neutral by 2050, if not sooner. The Country’s Climate change polices are largely
being driven by California law (SB32). These policies mandate California reduce its statewide GHG emissions
to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. Local Governments must do their fair share. Federal and state funds will
be allocated to this goal. Achieving the state GHG reduction mandate and achieving state RHNA/housing
affordability mandate should be the top priorities of the General Plan Update.
The existing General Plan vision includes a significant reduction of ADT. Combining reductions in ADT, VMT
and GHG emissions city‐wide, should be top priorities of the City’s Housing and Circulation Element Updates.
2030 Vision
Circumstances has changed significantly since the last General Plan update. The City needs to project a vision
of the City in 2030 to serve as a blueprint for this General Plan Update. What will the City’s population be?
Where will the City’s population growth be distributed? How many additional cars will be on the City’s
roadways? What percentage of the population will be driving electric vehicles? What will the City’s circulation
needs be given the mandated reduction in total VMT of 40% below 1990 levels?1 What will the City’s carbon
footprint be? What is Newport Beach’s plan to reach carbon neutrality?
California Air Resources Board 2000‐2018 GHG Inventory (2020 Edition)
1 A good example of a Climate Action Plan is the City of San Luis Obispo:
https://www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument?id=27835
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4a Additional Materials Received Draft Circulation Element Update
Draft Circulation Element Text
Comments, March 16, 2021
David Tanner Page 2 of 6
We need to project these changes, not only in the City, but in the region? What types of measures will local
governments within SCAG implement to achieve these Housing, GHG and VMT reduction mandates? How will
the region’s population growth impact the City?
Simply stated, we need to establish a 2030 Vision of where and how people and goods will move from one
place to another, how the City is going to accommodate state mandated housing/population growth, maintain
a jobs housing balance and protect, preserve and enhance where feasible, our quality of life, health and safety.
Based on the 2030 Vision, we should craft the Housing Element, Circulation Element and other General Plan
Elements to be internally consistent. Without the Vision, we have no blueprint!
Top priority – Establish the City 2030 Vision now. When the City has a draft “2030 Vision”, it should be shared
with the public for comment and later adopted by the City Council.
Implementation
Operation Warp Speed – we only have 9 years to achieve the 2030 Vision mandates. We cannot kick this can
down the road!
Draft Circulation Element Comments
Assumptions – Please provide the public the assumption used in the Draft Circulation Element.
Circulation Element Graphics – Please provide the public with all Circulation Element graphics (CE1‐5 + any
additional graphics)? The Circulation Element Graphics should identify location of all future bridge locations.
House Cleaning ‐ We should be going through the Circulation Element eliminating policies that are no longer
necessary, have been fully implemented or are infeasible.
Comments on Specific Policies
Policy
CE 1.1.3 Levels of Service Related to Community Character
Maintain and enhance where feasible ….
Add new Policies
CE 1.1.4
Continue to implement measures, such as special traffic signal timing, to reduce traffic wait times caused by
Pacific Coast Highway traffic synchronization on local cross street for persons living along and around the
beach and bay, as well as visitors.
CE ___ Reduce Citywide ADT per GP (Source: GP Introduction Chapter)
CE ___ Reduce Citywide total VMT to help achieve state GHG emission reduction mandates 40% below 1990
levels by 2030.
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4a Additional Materials Received Draft Circulation Element Update
Draft Circulation Element Text
Comments, March 16, 2021
David Tanner Page 3 of 6
Add New Goal
CE ___ Traffic Calming and Expression of Community Character
Reduce citywide Average Daily Traffic (ADT) by 28,920 trips each day over the life of the plan. (Source: GP
Introduction Chapter)
Add new Policies to achieve this goal.
CE __
CE 1.2.2 Shuttle Service
Encourage and maintain and enhance where feasible….
CE 2.1.1 Level of Service Standards
A. Level of Service (LOS) “D” “C” throughout the City, unless otherwise noted (to be achieved by reduction of
VMT, land planning (requiring deliveries at non‐peak hour, encourage nighttime businesses, shuttles, mass
transit, complete streets, use of alternate forms of transportation, managed pick‐ups and deliveries, etc.)
CE 2.1.2 Street and Highway Network
Construct Update the circulation system described on the map entitled Newport Beach Circulation Element‐
Master Plan of Streets and Highways shown in Figure CE1 and Figure CE2 (cross‐section). (Imp 14.9, 16.3)
Develop an updated plan for WCH. which includes traffic calming improvements and complete street features
for WCH.
CE 2.2.4 Driveway and Access Limitations
Improve pedestrian and vehicular safety at existing access points on WHC along Mariners Mile and WCH.
CE 2.3.1 Coast Highway Ownership
Pursue ownership of Coast Highway throughout Newport Beach, as opportunities arise. Work with Caltrans
to update Coast Highway Master Plan to incorporate traffic calming improvements, complete street features,
reduce ADT and VMT within the Mariners’ Mile and West Newport consistent with the City’s vision
(incorporate active transportation or electric vehicle improvements that reduce passenger car use, offer
mobility choice, enhance recreation and community health and pedestrian safety). Master Plan of Streets
and Highways and the OCTA Master Plan of Arterial Highways and to provide the City with more opportunities
to increase operational efficiencies. (Imp 2.1, 14.9)
Efforts to widen PCH through Corona del Mar and Mariners Mile should be abandoned!
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4a Additional Materials Received Draft Circulation Element Update
Draft Circulation Element Text
Comments, March 16, 2021
David Tanner Page 4 of 6
CE 3.1.X Traffic from Adjoining Communities
The City of Newport Beach shall continue to monitor land development applications in adjacent communities
and encourage coordination on land development projects that affect traffic and mobility in Newport Beach.
The idea is to discourage development in other cities from impacting Newport Beach street segments
experiencing poor LOS. Not just monitor and coordinate. This is going to become a greater problem
with the area‐wide implementation of RHNA.
Work with adjacent counties to reduce ADT impacting Newport Beach street segments experiencing
poor LOS through use of buses, shuttles and carpooling. The City should work with SCAG to reduce
the traffic volume on the 91 Freeway headed to Newport Beach!
CE 3.1.4 Regional Traffic Mitigation
Mitigate reduce regional traffic congestion.
We want Environmental Justice. Mitigation measures based on objective criteria that are effective and
enforceable with protocols for ensuring measures represent actual VMT and GHG emission reductions that
would achieve the goals of AB 32
CE 3.1.5 19th Street Bridge Santa Ana River Future Mobility Alternatives
…. without disproportionate impacts on Newport Beach including Coast Highway ….
CE 4.1.4 Land Use Densities Supporting Public Transit
Accommodate residential densities sufficient to support transit patronage, especially in mixed use areas such
as the Airport Area. (Imp 2.1) (this should remain and be coordinated with locations for high density RHNA
housing)
CE 5.1.A Bicycle Master Plan Vision
Provide for a network of active transportation facilities consistent with the vision in the current Newport
Beach Bicycle Master Plan.
Please explain why is this new Policy needed?
CE 5.1.B Bicycle Network Implementation
Review and program discrete active transportation projects outlined in the current Newport Beach Bicycle
Master Plan in the annual Capital Improvement Program.
Please explain why is this new Policy needed?
CE 5.1.2 Pedestrian Travel Mode Connectivity
Ensure all active transportation networks are safely linked …..
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4a Additional Materials Received Draft Circulation Element Update
Draft Circulation Element Text
Comments, March 16, 2021
David Tanner Page 5 of 6
CE 5.1.X Bicycle Supporting Facilities
Consider adding electric charging stations?
CE 5.1.12 Pedestrian Street Crossings
Continue to implement improved pedestrian crossings in coordination with traffic calming measures in key
high‐volume areas such as Corona Del Mar, Mariners’ Mile, West Newport, Airport Area, Newport
Center/Fashion Island, and the Balboa Peninsula. (Imp 16.11)
(This should be in coordination with traffic calming measures. The General Plan requires a specific reduction
in ADT. It does not say that cars have the ROW over pedestrians. Roads should not force people to use
bridges! This is not a one‐sided fix! Cars, trucks, electric bikes should be routed to avoid high‐volume
pedestrian crossings)
CE 5.1.13 Overhead Pedestrian Street Crossings
Consider overhead pedestrian crossings in commercial and business areas outside the coastal zone and
residential areas where pedestrian use limits the efficiency of the roadway or signalized intersection and/or
where an overhead crossing provides for improved pedestrian safety. (Imp 16.11)
Pedestrians have the ROW. Traffic calming measures should take precedent and not allow vehicles to
endanger pedestrian safety particularly within residential areas and the coastal zone. The reduction of ADT
in the existing General Plan and state mandates for VMT/GHG reduction should be integrated into the
planning process for the Circulation Element Update.
CE 5.1.16 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety
Provide for the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians through provision of adequate facilities, including review
of locations where sidewalk use by bicyclists is appropriate, consideration of separate facilities for e‐bikes or
other semimotorized modes, and maintenance and construction of extra sidewalk width where feasible. (Imp
16.11)
Mention bicycle integration into complete streets and trails?
CE 6.1.X2 Autonomous, Connected, and Future Vehicle Technology
Monitor the development of new vehicle technology and associated community‐based infrastructure. Plan
for the deployment of new vehicle technology through annual budgeting process and capital improvement
programming process.
Consider adding language to explore integrating autonomous use of drones.
Goal CE6‐2
Sounds good, but! It should contain objective enforceable standard to achieve the state mandates.
CE 6.2.X1 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4a Additional Materials Received Draft Circulation Element Update
Draft Circulation Element Text
Comments, March 16, 2021
David Tanner Page 6 of 6
Follow the analysis methodology for vehicle miles traveled according to the Newport Beach VMT thresholds
policy and as required in Senate Bill 743 and the revised California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines.
CE 6.2.1
Telecommuting is not an alternative form of transportation. What is the ADT & VMT reduction target for a
complete streets master plan? Otherwise, this will be just another study that does nothing.
CE 6.2.X4
What does “novel” mean? There should be a define objective performance standard.
CE 7.1.X2 Parking Consolidation
Evaluate the potential to consolidate underutilized parcels to create parking districts and to construct
areawide parking hubs potentially relieving individual parcels of some of their parking requirements.
No! this will encourage additional urban infill with insufficient parking.
Yes, to relieving existing parking shortfalls.
CE 7.1.5 Avon Street Municipal Parking Lot Relocation
Consider relocation of the Avon Street municipal lot to better serve commercial uses in Mariners’ Mile. (Imp
2.1, 16.10)
Delete this Policy. Why would we want to relocate this parking lot? Where would it be replaced.
Circumstances have changed. This parking lot would be used for high density in‐fill housing which is not
wanted! This will not be allowed by the LCP/Coastal Commission!
CE 7.2.X2 Parking Pricing Periodically review and update parking fees and rates at on‐street locations and off‐
street parking lots operated by the City.
Environmental Justice requirements need to be incorporated.
CE 7.2.3 Shared Valet Service
Explore the feasibility of shared valet parking programs in areas with high parking demand and less
conveniently located parking facilities, such as Mariners’ Mile and McFadden Square. (Imp 16.10)
Delete this policy. If this could have been done, it would have been done. It is not feasible.
Goal
CE 8.1
Adequate funding for needed transportation infrastructure and operations including support of measures for
outside funding of transportation improvements. Why are changes needed? What has changed?
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4a Additional Materials Received Draft Circulation Element Update
Initial Draft of the
Circulation Element
Update
Planning Commission Study Session
March 18, 2021
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4b Additional Materials Presented At Meeting By Staff
Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
PC Review
September 17, 2020
•Outlined PC’s possible oversight role
October 13, 2020
•Council delegates responsibility to PC
October 22, 2020
•Commissioner Koetting selected as liaison to HEUAC
November 19, 2020
•Circulation Element 101 presentation
All Other PC Meetings
•Provided status reports
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4b Additional Materials Presented At Meeting By Staff
Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Virtual Public Workshops
November 23, 2020
•Circulation Element 101
December 15, 2020
•Themes Workshop #1
December 16, 2020
•Themes Workshop #2
February 10, 2021
•Visioning Workshop
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4b Additional Materials Presented At Meeting By Staff
Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Summary of Updates
•Updated narrative
•92 existing Policies under 8 themes
•62 existing Policies proposed unchanged
•30 existing Policies updated to address changed
conditions or vision
•22 new Policies
4
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4b Additional Materials Presented At Meeting By Staff
Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Key Unchanged Policies
•Comprehensive/Integrated Transportation System
•Support Public Transit Services
•Consistency with OCTA Master Plan
•Pedestrian, Bicycle, Equestrian Trail System
•Traffic Signal Operations & Coordination
•Adequate/Convenient Parking -New Development
•Support Increased Outside Funding
5
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4b Additional Materials Presented At Meeting By Staff
Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Various Updated Policies
•Support added regional transit in higher-density areas
•Improve connectivity to places of interest
•Minimize conflict w/ new modes of transit (e.g., e-bikes)
•Promote and encourage telecommuting programs
•Require bicycle amenities in new development
•Review parking requirements in NBMC
•Santa Ana River mobility alternatives
6
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4b Additional Materials Presented At Meeting By Staff
Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Legal Mandates & Regional Plans
•Complete Streets Act of 2008 –Multimodal
transportation network meeting needs of all users for safe
and convenient travel
•SB 743 –CEQA impacts assessment based on VMT
•Long-range plan (Connect SoCal) –2020-2045 Regional
Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy
balances future mobility and housing needs with economic,
environmental and public health goals
7
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4b Additional Materials Presented At Meeting By Staff
Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
New Policies
•Climate Change & Emerging Technology
•Complete Streets Master Plan
•Study pilot shuttle system connecting villages w/in city
•Safe System Approach for implementing safety
projects
•Construction Management Plans for new development
•Monitor land development projects in adjacent
jurisdictions
8
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4b Additional Materials Presented At Meeting By Staff
Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
New Policies (Cont.)
•Incorporate current Bicycle Master Plan and program
active transportation projects
•Require bicycle facilities w/ new development and
encourage in existing development
•Monitor rideshare (Uber, Lyft) use/design for curbside
improvements –loading zones
•Monitor autonomous vehicles and plan infrastructure
•Communicate with providers (Waze, Google Maps) to
reduce routing traffic through neighborhoods
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4b Additional Materials Presented At Meeting By Staff
Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
•Parking app technology that identifies available spaces
•Follow VMT methodology approved by Council in 2020
•Strategize to incorporate curbside right-of-way for
rideshare drop-off or valet, and delivery zones
•Install more EV charging stations on City property,
require stations be installed w/ new development
•Evaluate consolidating underutilized parcels to create
areawide parking hubs
10
New Policies (Cont.)
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4b Additional Materials Presented At Meeting By Staff
Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Next Steps
•April 5 –Circulation
Element Virtual Workshop
•April 30 –Deadline to
provide comments on draft
•May –City Council review
•Late Spring/Early Summer
–Revised document for
review
11
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4b Additional Materials Presented At Meeting By Staff
Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Questions?
Thank you!
Tony Brine, City Traffic Engineer
Tony Petros, LSA Associates
GPUpdate@newportbeachca.gov
Planning Commission - March 18, 2021 Item No. 4b Additional Materials Presented At Meeting By Staff
Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)