HomeMy WebLinkAbout20200611_Resolution_ZA2020-050Community Development Department
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, California 92660
949 644-3200
newportbeachca.gov/communitydevelopment
VIA EMAIL
June 11, 2020
Mr. and Mrs. English
1731 Centella Place
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Jeffery.p.english@gmail.com
Subject: Modification Permit No. MD2020-002 (PA2020-015)
1731 Centella Place
English Residence Addition
Dear Mr. English,
It was a pleasure working with you on the above referenced application. Please be
advised that the subject application was approved by the Zoning Administrator on
June 11, 2020 and effective on June 25, 2020. A copy of the approved resolution
with findings and conditions is attached. If you have any questions, please do not
hesitate to contact me directly. Thank you and I look forward to working with you
again in the future.
For additional information on filing an appeal or should you have any questions,
please contact our office at 949-644-3200 or you may contact me directly at
jperez@newportbeachca.gov or 949-644-3312.
Sincerely,
BMZ/jp
RESOLUTION NO. ZA2020-050
A RESOLUTION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING
MODIFICATION PERMIT NO. MD2020-002 FOR AN ADDITION
GREATER THAN 10 PERCENT TO A SINGLE-FAMILY
DWELLING WITH A LEGAL NONCONFORMING GARAGE
LOCATED AT 1731 CENTELLA PLACE (PA2020-015)
THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS.
1. An application was filed by Jeff and Haley English (“Applicants”), with respect to property
located at 1731 Centella Place, and legally described as Lot 5 of Tract No. 3176 requesting
approval of a modification permit.
2. The Applicants propose the remodel of an existing single-family residence with a garage
that is considered legal nonconforming due to its interior dimensions and the construction
of a 690-square-foot addition. The existing garage provides the minimum required depth
of 20 feet; however, the existing width is substandard at 17 feet, whereas the requirement
is 20 feet. The Modification Permit is necessary because the Applicants propose to add
more than 10 percent of the existing square footage without altering the garage for
compliance. The proposed addition is 690 square feet and results in a total of 2,699 square
feet for the residence (including the garage).
3. The subject property is designated RS-D (Single Unit Residential Detached) by the
General Plan Land Use Element and is located within the R-1-10000 (Single-Unit
Residential) Zoning District.
4. The subject property is not located within the coastal zone; therefore, a coastal
development permit is not required.
5. A public hearing was held on June 11, 2020, in the Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center
Drive, Newport Beach. A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in
accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC). Evidence, both written
and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Zoning Administrator at this hearing.
SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION.
1. This project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
Section 15303 under Class 1 (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code
of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a
significant effect on the environment.
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-050
Page 2 of 7
01-25-19
2. This exemption includes additions to existing structures up to 50 percent of the floor
area of the structure before the addition, or 2,500 square feet, whichever is less. The
proposed project is a 690 square foot addition to an existing single-family residence
within a developed neighborhood and is not within an environmentally sensitive area.
SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS.
In accordance with Section 20.52.050(E) (Modification Permits – Required Findings) of the
NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth:
Finding:
A. The requested modification will be compatible with existing development in the
neighborhood.
Facts in Support of Finding:
1. The existing development is a 2,009 square-foot, single-family residence with attached
garage. The residence is located on a cul-de-sac and is abutted primarily by single family
residences.
2. The addition would provide more living area for the family by increasing the size of the
dwelling unit by 690 square feet. The addition is single story and is consistent with the
design and height of other properties in the neighborhood.
3. There is no change to the density or the use as a result of the proposed remodel and
addition.
Finding:
B. The granting of the modification is necessary due to the unique physical characteristic(s) of
the property and/or structure, and/or characteristics of the use.
Facts in Support of Finding:
1. The existing structure was built in the late 1950s and complied with the standards at the
time of construction. Subsequent amendments to the standards have rendered the
interior clear dimensions of the existing two (2)-car garage to be substandard in size.
2. NBMC Subsection 20.38.030(C) defines a “legal nonconforming structure” as any
structure that was lawfully erected but does not conform with the current development
standards for the zoning district in which it is located by reason of adoption or
amendment of the Zoning Code.
3. The garage is covered by a gabled roof that extends from the main ridge beam of the
house. Modifying the garage walls, which are not within the area of the proposed
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-050
Page 3 of 7
01-25-19
construction, would require reframing the entire garage. Reframing the garage would
significantly increase the scope of the project and the cost.
Finding:
C. The granting of the modification is necessary due to practical difficulties associated with the
property and that the strict application of the Zoning Code results in physical hardships that
are inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Code.
Facts in Support of Finding:
1. The exterior wall of the garage is located within the required side setback area and the
current development standards do not allow for the exterior wall to be relocated there in
order to provide the Code-required width.
2. Relocating the interior garage wall 3 feet south into the dwelling space, to achieve the
20-foot clear dimension for width, would result in reduction of living space which is
contrary to the purpose of the proposed addition.
Finding:
D. There are no alternatives to the modification permit that could provide similar benefits to the
applicants with less potential detriment to surrounding owners and occupants, the
neighborhood, or to the general public.
Facts in Support of Finding:
1. Bringing the garage into compliance with current Zoning Code requirements would
provide a negligible benefit but it would unreasonably require significant alterations to
the structure well beyond the scope of the planned addition.
2. The intent of the project is to provide a new laundry room, additional bathroom, and
larger kitchen space. A redesign to reduce the size of the addition to 200 square feet
will significantly impact the objectives of the project and would not provide similar
benefits to the Applicants.
Finding:
E. The granting of the modification would not be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare,
to the occupants of the property, nearby properties, the neighborhood, or the City, or result
in a change in density or intensity that would be inconsistent with the provisions of this
Zoning Code.
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-050
Page 4 of 7
01-25-19
Facts in Support of Finding:
1. The proposed construction conforms to all applicable development standards, including
floor area limit, setbacks, height, and will provide adequate protection for light, air, and
privacy. The addition will not preclude access to the dwelling and will be consistent in
scale with other dwellings in the neighborhood.
2. The proposed addition will increase the total square footage of the residence (including
garage) to 2,699 square feet. While the R-1-10000 zoning designation does not identify
a limitation on square footage, it does limit development with a maximum lot area
coverage of 60 percent. The project will increase the total lot coverage from 21.5 percent
to 32.9 percent.
3. The proposed project maintains more than the minimum 3-foot side yard for fire access
in accordance with Zoning Code Section 20.30.110 (Setbacks Regulations and
Exceptions), Subsection A(1)(c).
4. The approval of this Modification Permit is conditioned such that the Applicants are
required to obtain all necessary permits in accordance with the Building Code and other
applicable Codes. The Building Division has reviewed the proposed project and added
conditions of approval for demonstration of project compliance with Building Codes.
5. In addition to the 2-car garage, the property includes a driveway adequate in size to
accommodate parking for two additional vehicles on-site, minimizing demand for on-
street parking.
SECTION 4. DECISION.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The Zoning Administrator of the City of Newport Beach hereby finds this project is
categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section
15303 under Class 1 (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of
Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a significant
effect on the environment.
2. The Zoning Administrator of the City of Newport Beach hereby approves Modification
Permit No. MD2020-002, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit “A,” which is attached
hereto and incorporated by reference.
3. This action shall become final and effective 14 days following the date this Resolution
was adopted unless within such time an appeal or call for review is filed with the
Community Development Director in accordance with the provisions of Title 20 Planning
and Zoning of the NBMC.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2020.
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-050
Page 5 of 7
01-25-19
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-050
Page 6 of 7
01-25-19
EXHIBIT “A”
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Division
1. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, floor
plans and building elevations stamped and dated with the date of this approval (except as
modified by applicable conditions of approval).
2. The project is subject to all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards, unless
specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval.
3. The Applicants shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws. Material violation of
any of those laws in connection with the use may be cause for revocation of this
Modification Permit.
4. This Modification Permit may be modified or revoked by the Zoning Administrator if
determined that the proposed uses or conditions under which it is being operated or
maintained is detrimental to the public health, welfare or materially injurious to property
or improvements in the vicinity or if the property is operated or maintained so as to
constitute a public nuisance.
5. Any change to the approved plans, shall require review by the Planning Division. An
amendment to or the processing of a new modification permit may be required.
6. A copy of the Resolution, including conditions of approval Exhibit “A” shall be
incorporated into the Building Division and field sets of plans prior to issuance of the
building permits.
7. Each parking space within the garage shall be permanently available and maintained
for parking purposes. The interior clear dimensions (17 feet wide by minimum 20 feet
deep) shall be kept clear of obstructions including cabinets, shelving, or similar that may
impact the ability to adequately park two vehicles.
8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicants shall submit to the Planning
Division an additional copy of the approved architectural plans for inclusion in the
Modification Permit file. The plans shall be identical to those approved by all City
departments for building permit issuance. The approved copy shall include architectural
sheets only and shall be reduced in size to 11 inches by 17 inches. The plans shall
accurately depict the elements approved by this Modification Permit and shall highlight
the approved elements such that they are readily discernible from other elements of the
plans.
9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicants shall pay any unpaid
administrative costs associated with the processing of this application to the Planning
Division.
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2020-050
Page 7 of 7
01-25-19
10. Should the property be sold or otherwise come under different ownership, any future
owners or assignees shall be notified of the conditions of this approval by either the
current business owner, property owner or the leasing agent.
11. Construction activities shall comply with Section 10.28.040 of the NBMC, which restricts
hours of noise-generating construction activities that produce noise to between the
hours of 7 a.m. and 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. on
Saturday. Noise-generating construction activities are not allowed on Sundays or
Holidays.
12. This approval shall expire and become void unless exercised within 24 months from the
actual date of review authority approval, except where an extension of time is approved in
compliance with the provisions of Title 20 Planning and Zoning of the NBMC.
13. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Applicants shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless
City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents
from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of
action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including
without limitation, attorney’s fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature
whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City’s
approval of English Residence Addition including, but not limited to Modification Permit No.
MD2020-002 (PA2020-015). This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to,
damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other
expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit or
proceeding whether incurred by Applicants, City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing
such proceeding. The Applicants shall indemnify the City for all of City's costs, attorneys'
fees, and damages which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth
in this condition. The Applicants shall pay to the City upon demand any amount owed to
the City pursuant to the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition.
Building Division
14. The Applicants are required to obtain all applicable permits from the City’s Building Division
and Fire Department. The construction plans must comply with the most recent, City-
adopted version of the California Building Code. The construction plans must meet all
applicable State Disabilities Access requirements.
15. Fire sprinklers will be required when the cost of the proposed
addition/alteration/reconstruction exceeds 50% of the replacement value of the existing
building.
Public Works Department
16. No improvements shall be installed within the limits of the 6-foot-wide utility easement
in the rear of the property.