Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20171012_Resolution_ZA2017-079Community Development Department CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 949 644-3200 newportbeachca.gov/communitydevelopment VIA EMAIL October 13, 2017 Justin Henderson Mastercraft Residential 20201 SW Birch Street, Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Subject: Tentative Parcel Map No. 2017-019 (PA 2017-170) County Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-179 416 Marguerite Avenue Justin, It was a pleasure working with you on the above referenced application. Please be advised that the application was approved by the Zoning Administrator on October 12, 2017 and will become effective on October 27, 2017. A copy of the approved resolution with findings and conditions is attached. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office at 949-644- 3200 or you may contact me directly by email at lschuller@newportbeachca.gov or by phone at 949-644-3237. Sincerely, Liane Schuller, Contract Planner BMZ/ls RESOLUTION NO. ZA2017-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. NP2017-019 FOR TWO-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES LOCATED AT 416 MARGUERITE AVENUE (PA2017- 170) THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS. 1. An application was filed by Justin Henderson, Mastercraft Residential (Applicant), on behalf of HB 300 Partners, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company (Property Owner), with respect to property located at 416 Marguerite Avenue, and legally described as Lot 10, Block 439 of the Corona del Mar Subdivision, requesting approval of a tentative parcel map. 2. The Applicant proposes a tentative parcel map application for two-unit condominium purposes. No waiver of Title 19 (Subdivisions) development standards are proposed with this application. A single-family residence was demolished and a new duplex is currently being constructed. The Tentative Parcel Map would allow each unit to be sold individually as condominiums. 3. The subject property is designated Two-Unit Residential (RT) by the General Plan Land Use Element and is located within the Two-Unit Residential (R-2) Zoning District. 4. The subject property is not located within the coastal zone; therefore, no coastal development permit is required. 5. A public hearing was held on October 12, 2017, in the Corona del Mar Conference Room (Bay E-1st Floor) at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach. A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Zoning Administrator at this hearing. SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION. 1. This project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15315 under Class 15 (Minor Land Divisions) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. 2. The Class 15 exemption allows the division of property in urbanized areas zoned for residential, commercial, or industrial use into four or fewer parcels when the division is Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2017-079 Page 2 of 8 07-11-17 in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are required, all services and access to the proposed parcels are available, the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous two years, and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent. The Tentative Parcel Map is for condominium purposes and is consistent with all of the requirements of the Class 15 exemption. SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS. The Zoning Administrator determined in this case that the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 (Planning and Zoning) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC) and is approved based on the following findings per Section 19.12.070 (Required Findings for Action on Tentative Maps): Finding: A. That the proposed map and the design or improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan, and with applicable provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and this Subdivision Code. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map is for two-unit residential condominium purposes. A single- family dwelling, originally constructed in 1945, was demolished and is being replaced with a new duplex. The proposed subdivision and improvements are consistent with the density of the R-2 Zoning District and the RT General Plan Land Use Designation. 2. The proposed project site is not located within any specific plan area. Finding: B. That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of development. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The lot is physically suitable for two-unit development because it is rectangular in shape and topographically flat, which is typical of lots in this area. 2. A residential use has existed on this site since at least 1945. The proposed project will replace the previously existing single-family residence with a new duplex that is compliant with all current code requirements. 3. The subject property has street frontage on Marguerite Avenue and is also accessible from the alley at the rear. It is adequately served by existing utilities. Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2017-079 Page 3 of 8 07-11-17 Finding: C. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. However, notwithstanding the foregoing, the decision making body may nevertheless approve such a subdivision if an environmental impact report was prepared for the project and a finding was made pursuant to Section 21081 of the California Environmental Quality Act that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. See Fact in Support of Finding B2. 2. The property is located in an urbanized area that does not contain any sensitive vegetation or habitat. 3. The project is categorically exempt under Section 15315 (Article 19 of Chapter 3), of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines – Class 15 (Minor Land Divisions). Finding: D. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. Fact in Support of Finding: The Tentative Parcel Map is for residential condominium purposes. All improvements associated with the project will comply with all Building, Public Works, and Fire Codes, which are in place to prevent serious public health problems. Public improvements will be required of the developer per NBMC Section 19.28.010 (General Improvement Requirements) and Section 66411 (Local agencies to regulate and control design of subdivisions) of the Subdivision Map Act. All ordinances of the City and all Conditions of Approval will be complied with. Finding: E. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. In this connection, the decision making body may approve a map if it finds that alternate easements, for access or for use, will be provided and that these easements will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This finding shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction and no authority is hereby granted to Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2017-079 Page 4 of 8 07-11-17 the City Council to determine that the public at large has acquired easements for access through or use of property within a subdivision. Fact in Support of Finding: The design of the development will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of property within the proposed development, because there are no public easements located on the property. Finding: F. That, subject to the detailed provisions of Section 66474.4 of the Subdivision Map Act, if the land is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act), the resulting parcels following a subdivision of the land would not be too small to sustain their agricultural use or the subdivision will result in residential development incidental to the commercial agricultural use of the land. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The property is not subject to the Williamson Act because the subject property is not designated as an agricultural preserve and is less than 100 acres in area. 2. The site is developed for residential use and is within the R-2 Zoning District, which permits residential uses. Finding: G. That, in the case of a “land project” as defined in Section 11000.5 of the California Business and Professions Code: (1) there is an adopted specific plan for the area to be included within the land project; and (2) the decision making body finds that the proposed land project is consistent with the specific plan for the area. 1. The property is not a “land project” as defined in Section 11000.5 of the California Business and Professions Code because the existing subdivision does not contain fifty (50) or more parcels. 2. The project is not located within a specific plan area. Finding: H. That solar access and passive heating and cooling design requirements have been satisfied in accordance with Sections 66473.1 and 66475.3 of the Subdivision Map Act. Fact in Support of Finding: Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2017-079 Page 5 of 8 07-11-17 The Tentative Parcel Map and any future improvements are subject to Title 24 of the California Building Code that requires new construction to meet minimum heating and cooling efficiency standards depending on location and climate. The Newport Beach Building Division enforces Title 24 compliance through the plan check and inspection process. Finding: I. That the subdivision is consistent with Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 65584 of the California Government Code regarding the City’s share of the regional housing need and that it balances the housing needs of the region against the public service needs of the City’s residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. Fact in Support of Finding: The proposed duplex is consistent with the R-2 Zoning District, which allows two (2) residential units on the property. Therefore, the Tentative Parcel Map for condominium purposes will not affect the City in meeting its regional housing need. Finding: J. That the discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing sewer system will not result in a violation of existing requirements prescribed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Fact in Support of Finding: The new duplex has been designed and will be constructed so that wastewater discharge into the existing sewer system complies with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requirements. Finding: K. For subdivisions lying partly or wholly within the Coastal Zone, that the subdivision conforms with the certified Local Coastal Program and, where applicable, with public access and recreation policies of Chapter Three of the Coastal Act. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The subject property is not located within the Coastal Zone. 2. The project is not located between the nearest public road and the sea or shoreline of any body of water located within the Coastal Zone; therefore, the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act are not applicable. Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2017-079 Page 6 of 8 07-11-17 SECTION 4. DECISION. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017. _____________________________________ Patrick J. Alford, Zoning Administrator Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2017-079 Page 7 of 8 07-11-17 EXHIBIT “A” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The project is subject to all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards, unless specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval. 2. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, the Applicant shall apply for a building permit for a description change of the subject project development from “duplex” to “condominium.” The development will not be condominiums until this permit is finaled. The building permit for the new construction shall not be finaled until after recordation of the Parcel Map. 3. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, the Applicant shall pay an in-lieu park dedication fee for an increase of one dwelling unit. The fee shall be charged consistent with that in effect at the time of payment. 4. This approval shall expire and become void unless exercised within 24 months from the actual date of review authority approval, except where an extension of time is approved in compliance with the provisions of NBMC Title 19. 5. To the fullest extent permitted by law, applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including without limitation, attorney’s fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which, may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City’s approval of the 416 Marguerite Avenue Tentative Parcel Map including, but not limited to, NP2017-019 (PA2017-170). This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit or proceeding whether incurred by applicant, City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The applicant shall indemnify the City for all of City's costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth in this condition. The applicant shall pay to the City upon demand any amount owed to the City pursuant to the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition. 6. A Final Parcel Map shall be recorded. The Map shall be prepared on the California coordinate system (NAD83). Prior to recordation of the Map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the Map shall submit to the County Surveyor and the City of Newport Beach a digital-graphic file of said map in a manner described in Section 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. The Map to be submitted to the City of Newport Beach shall comply with the City’s CADD Standards. Scanned images will not be accepted. Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2017-079 Page 8 of 8 07-11-17 7. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor in a manner described in Section s 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. Monuments (one inch iron pipe with tag) shall be set On Each Lot Corner unless otherwise approved by the Subdivision Engineer. Monuments shall be protected in place if installed prior to completion of construction project. 8. All improvements shall be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 9. The Applicant shall reconstruct all damaged concrete sidewalk panels, curb and gutter along the Marguerite Avenue property frontage and any damaged concrete alley panels along the alley property frontage as determined by the Public Works Department. 10. All existing overhead utilities shall be undergrounded. 11. All above ground improvements shall stay a minimum 5-foot clear of the alley setback. 12. All existing private, non-standard improvements, including but not limited to concrete carriage walks and fences, within the public right-of-way and/or extensions of private, non-standard improvements into the public right-of-way fronting the development site shall be removed. 13. The Applicant shall install new sod or low groundcovers of the type approved by the City throughout the Marguerite Avenue parkway fronting the development site. 14. Each unit shall be served by its individual water meter and sewer lateral and cleanout. Each water meter and sewer cleanout shall be installed with a traffic-grade box and cover. 15. An encroachment permit is required for all work activities within the public right-of-way. 16. All improvements shall comply with the City’s sight distance requirement. See City Standard 110-L. 17. In case of damage done to public improvements surrounding the development site by the private construction, additional reconstruction within the public right-of-way could be required at the discretion of the Public Works Inspector.