HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/22/1994 Item #(31
C--579
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
August 19, 1994
BY THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF NBVPORT BEACH
AUG 2 21994
TO: Honorable Mayor And Members Of The City Council
FROM: Kevin J. Murphy, City Manager
SUBJECT: BALBOA BAY CLUB LEGISLATION
BACKGROUND:
The City Council on April 11th, May 9th and July 8th received staff reports
and discussed State legislation designed to resolve the City's dispute with the
State Lands Commission on the tidelands/uplands designation of the Balboa
Bay Club and the attendant requirement to convert it to visitor serving uses
in December 1998, if the dispute is not resolved through "legislative, judicial
or other appropriate process." The staff reports from each of these prior
discussions is attached for your information (Attachment 1, 2 and 3).
DISCUSSION:
On August 9th, the City Attorney and I met with State Lands Commission
staff to discuss the status of the legislation and their concerns on prior
legislative proposals. At the conclusion of that discussion, the City Attorney
was requested to draft a revised legislative proposal, incorporating more
extensive findings for the legislation, and as you'll see in the attached letter
(Attachment 4) dated August 11th trying to resolve the current use of the
Terrace Apartments and the required modification to hotel or other similar
visitor serving use in December 1998.
Late August 17th the City staff received a new proposal from State Lands staff
which was consistent with the City Attorney's draft of August 11th, excepting
section (m). I've attached this section (see Attachment 5), which you'll note
provides for a sharing of future Balboa Bay Club revenues with the County
and the State Lands Commission. Staff has objected to this proposal for
obvious reasons and due to the lateness of the legislative session has worked
with Senator Bergeson's office and State Lands staff to try and craft a
legislative proposal that will succeed this legislative session which terminates
on August 31st. The latest proposal which City staff has indicated we will
recommend to the City Council on August 22nd is attached for your review
in its entirety (Attachment 6), but the key section is on the bottom of Page
three and top of Page four in section (m). It provides that the City will receive
-2-
95% of the Bay Club's revenues, with 5% received by the State Lands
Commission to fund State review of management of public trust property.
Five years after the effective date of any new Bay Club lease, that the State
Lands Commission would be required to approve (and consistent with other
provisions of the legislation, particularly (j), (k), and (1)), the formula would
provide 90% to the City and 10% to State Lands. Presumably at that time the
City would be receiving greater revenues from the expanded and redeveloped
project which would permit sharing with the State Lands Commission for
greater oversight activities on their part.
In order for the Legislature to act on this bill this year the latest version was
forwarded to the Legislative Counsel's Office by Senator Bergeson's staff and
incorporated into AB 3139 by Assemblyman Terry Friedman with the
understanding that the City Council must give their approval for this matter
to proceed further in the process. If the City Council approves of this
legislation then the matter will be heard in Committee on Wednesday,
August 24th and will likely go to the floor of the Assembly and Senate on
Thursday and Friday.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City staff endorses this legislative proposal for several reasons:
1) Based on conversations with our economic analyst on the Bay Club
project the redevelopment of the Bay Club is economically infeasible
without the resolution of the Terrace Apartments issue. The Terrace
Apartments now represent a significant portion of the revenue stream
and will be relied upon for any redevelopment to take place by a
lender. If conversion of the apartments in 1998 isn't resolved, the
redevelopment and lease negotiations will await future legislative or
judicial action.
2) This session is the last session of the State Legislature for Senator
Bergeson who has effectively lobbied for this legislation on our behalf.
We will have to start over next year with new State representatives
who may not have the political strength and prominence now enjoyed
by Senator Bergeson.
3) Staff does not believe that any future attempts at this legislative
resolution will be successful without the provisions for State Lands
financial assistance.
IN
4) Legal or judicial attempts to resolve the issue of uplands or tidelands
may be very expensive and without guarantee that the City would
succeed.
ATTACHMENT 1
TO:
FROM:
SUBJ:
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
April 6, 1994
Mayor Clarence Turner
Members of City Council
Robert H. Burnham
AGENDA N0. 21
E PR 1 i
i
Proposed Legislation Regarding Terrace Apartments
Balboa Bay Club/Terrace Apartments
In 1985, as the City and the Balboa Bay Club were negotiating
a lease extension, the State Lands Commission advised us they
considered the Balboa Bay Club parcel to consist of state
tidelands. State Lands staff presented some documentation to
support their claim, but the documentation was not conclusive. The
City had long assumed the parcel consisted of tidelands and uplands
with the Terrace Apartments located on uplands. According to State
Lands staff, permanent residential or apartment uses are
incompatible with the public trust inherent in tidelands.
The parties had nearly concluded lease negotiations and
resolution of the tideland issue would have required lengthy
litigation or time consuming legislation. Accordingly, the City
and the Balboa Bay Club agreed that there would be no permanent
residential use of the property subsequent to December 31, 1998
unless, prior to that date:
"a determination is made through the legislative,
judicial or other appropriate process that said permanent
residential apartments are legally proper uses on the
leased premises." (1986 Lease - paragraph 30)
The Staff had long assumed that Senator Marian Bergeson who
has a good relationship with the State Lands Commission, would be
the best person to carried legislation to resolve the dispute. The
time for submitting legislation expired at the end of February and
Staff hurriedly prepared draft legislation to be authored by
Senator Bergeson and carry it if the City Council approved.
Senator Bergeson has reserved a spot for the Bill but neither her
staff nor City staff has taken further action pending Council
review. I have attached a copy of the proposed legislation
submitted to Holly Veale, Senator Bergeson's Field Coordinator.
The proposed legislation is similar to the Beacon Bay Bill and
would free the Terrace Apartment site from restrictions inherent in
Tidelands. Revenue derived from the Terrace Apartments would
continue to go into the Tidelands Fund. The legislation would
allow, but not require, the Terrace Apartments to continue to be
used for residential purposes.
According to Bay Club representatives the cost of converting
the Terrace Apartments to a hotel would exceed $20,000,000 and the
City would lose substantial revenue during conversion process.
Major modifications to the terms and conditions of tenancy could
significantly increase the vacancy rate and also reduce City
leasehold revenue. Resolution of the tideland dispute relative to
the use of the Terrace Apartments will maximize income to the City
regardless of the outcome of any redevel"pment proposal submitted
by the Balboa Bay Club.
e
Robert H. Burnham
City Attorney
RHB:gj
Terrace.mem
ti
UNCODIFIED STATUTE
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION I
The legislature makes the following findings and
determinations:
(a) By virtue of the provisions of Chapters 74 of the
Statutes of 1978 (Beacon Bay Bill) the legislature
conveyed certain tide and submerged lands, in trust,. to
the City of Newport Beach for various purposes, but
primarily for the promotion and accommodation of
commerce, fishing and navigation.
(b) Certain portions of these tide and submerged lands have
been filled and reclaimed as a result of a plan of
improvement including the development of a harbor
facility. In addition to the filled tide and submerged
lands identified in the Beacon Bay Bill, the following
additional parcel has been filled and reclaimed
(Parcel D).
(c) Parcel D has been fully developed, leased, and is
producing income to support the statutory trust pursuant
to which the tide and submerged lands are held by the
City, and, except for the production of income, Parcel D
is no longer required or needed for the promotion of the
public trust inherent in tide and submerged lands.
(d) Parcel D is hereby freed of the public trust for
navigation, commerce and fishing and may continue to be
used for those purposes set forth in the existing lease
between the City and the Balboa Bay Club, but shall
continue to be held in trust by the City of Newport Beach
subject to the other terms and provisions of this Act and
the laws applicable to the tide and submerged lands.
Parcel D shall be held subject to the condition that
revenues derived from the leasing or administration of
Parcel D shall be used as provided in this act.
(e) The present use of Parcel D and the preservation of that
use for the production of income to promote the public
trust is in the best interest of the people of the State.
Section II
Notwithstanding any provision of the Beacon Bay Bill or other
law, the public trust inherent in tide and submerged lands is
hereby removed from Parcel D, and Parcel D may be used for such
purposes as will produce the maximum revenue for the fund created
4L
pursuant to this -Act; --or the use of property on January 1, 19941
provided the City complies with the following:
(a) The consideration received by the City for any lease of
Parcel.D shall be the fair market rental value of the
real property and the improvements existing as of January
1, 1994 subject to any lease advantage held by the
current tenant.
(b) The form of any lease of Parcel D, and the range of
consideration to be received by the City, shall be
approved by the State Lands Commission prior to the
approval of any future lease or re-leasing.
(c) All money received by the City from the existing or
future lease of Parcel D shall be deposited in a City
tideland fund with the revenue used only for purposes
consistent with the promotion of the public trust over
the remaining tide and submerged lands granted to the
City.
Cha74mod.doc
ATTACHMENT 2
TO:
FROM:
SUBJ:
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
MEMORANDUM
May 4, 1994
Mayor Clarence Turner
Members of City Council
Robert H. Burnham
AGENDA #35 (3y
C
C- -6- / l
r'
MAY:
Proposed Legislation Regarding Terrace Apartments
Balboa Bay Club/Terrace Apartments
In 1985, as the City and the Balboa Bay Club were negotiating
a lease extension, the State Lands Commission advised us they
considered the Balboa Bay Club parcel to consist of state
tidelands. State Lands staff presented some documentation to
support their claim, but the documentation was not conclusive. The
City had long assumed the parcel consisted of tidelands and uplands
with the Terrace Apartments located on uplands. According to State
Lands staff, permanent residential or apartment uses are
incompatible with the public trust inherent in tidelands.
The parties had nearly concluded lease negotiations and
resolution of the tideland issue would have required lengthy
litigation or time consuming legislation. Accordingly, the City
and the Balboa Bay Club agreed that there would be no permanent
residential use of the property subsequent to December 31, 1998
unless, prior to that date:
"a determination is made through the legislative,
judicial or other appropriate process that said permanent
residential apartments are legally proper uses on the
leased premises." (1986 Lease - paragraph 30)
The Staff had long assumed that Senator Marian Bergeson who
has a good relationship with the State Lands Commission, would be
the best person to carry legislation to resolve the dispute. Since
Senator Bergeson will not be in a position to carry such
legislation next year and with the time running out for submittal
of legislative proposals this year, Staff hurriedly prepared draft
legislation and asked Senator Bergeson to reserve a spot for the
Bill. Aside from my efforts to determine State Lands position on
the proposed legislation, Staff has taken no action pending Council
approval. I have attached a copy of the proposed legislation with
changes suggested by Councilwoman Watt shown in strikeout,
underlined text.
Memo to May Turner
5/4/94
page two
The proposed legislation is similar to the Beacon Bay Bill and
would free the Terrace Apartment site from restrictions inherent in
tidelands. Revenue derived from the Terrace Apartments would
continue to go into the Tidelands Fund. The intent of the
legislation is to allow, but not require, the Terrace Apartments to
continue to be used for residential purposes. Staff is aware that
some members of the public would prefer the elimination of the
Terrace Apartments upon expiration of the current lease and the
proposed legislation would not prohibit the Council from taking
such action.
According to Bay Club representatives the cost of converting
the Terrace Apartments to a hotel would exceed $20,000,000 and the
City would lose substantial revenue during conversion process.
Major modifications to the terms and conditions of tenancy could
significantly increase the vacancy rate and also reduce City
leasehold revenue. Resolution of the tideland dispute relative to
the use of the Terrace Apartments will satisfy the terms and
conditions of the 1986 Lease, give the Council greater flexibility
with respect to the use of the property, and allow the City to
receive the maximum rental income (under the 1986 lease) until such
time as the Council decides the most appropriate use for the site.
if Ze
Robert H. Burnham
City Attorney
RHB:kct
Terrace.mem
Revised 5/4
UNCODIFIED STATUTE
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION I
The legislature makes the following findings and
determinations:
(a) By virtue of the provisions of Chapters 74 of the
Statutes of 1978 (Beacon Bay Bill) the legislature
conveyed certain tide and submerged lands, in trust, to
the City of Newport Beach for various purposes, but
primarily for the promotion and accommodation of
commerce, fishing and navigation.
(b) Certain portions of these tide and submerged lands have
been filled and reclaimed as a result of a plan of
improvement including the development of a harbor
facility. In addition to the filled tide and submerged
lands identified in the Beacon Bay Bill, the following
additional parcel has been filled and reclaimed
(Parcel D) .
(c) Parcel D has been fully developed, leased, and is
producing income to support the statutory trust pursuant
to which the tide and submerged lands are held by the
City. and emeep t --€e r the—pre duetien ef ineeme;,Pareel
the pubb-I-'-tidesubmerged lands.
(d) Parcel D is hereby freed of the public trust for
navigation, commerce and fishing and, until such time as
it is restored to less developed or beach use may
continue to be used for those purposes set forth in the
existing lease between the City and the Balboa Bay Club,
but shall continue to be held in trust by the City of
Newport Beach subject to the other terms and provisions
of this Act and the laws applicable to the tide and
submerged lands. Parcel D shall be held subject to the
condition that revenues derived from the leasing or
administration of Parcel D shall be used as provided in
this act.
(e) The present use ef Pareel—B—and the preservation f that
trust is in the best interest ef the p eepl e a €the-6taze—.
Section II
Notwithstanding any provision of the Beacon Bay Bill or other
law, the public trust inherent in tide and submerged lands is
hereby removed from Parcel D, and Parcel D may be used for such
purposes as will produce the maximum revenue for the fund created
pursuant to this Act, or the use of property on January 1, 1994,
provided the City complies with the following:
(a) The consideration received by the City for any lease of
Parcel D shall be the fair market rental value of the
real property and the improvements existing as of January
1, 1994 subject to any lease advantage held by the
current tenant.
(b) The form of any lease of Parcel D, and the range of
consideration to be received by the City, shall be
approved by the State Lands Commission prior to the
approval of any future lease or re-leasing.
(c) All money received by the City from the existing or
future lease of Parcel D shall be deposited in a City
tideland fund with the revenue used only for purposes
consistent with the promotion of the public trust over
the remaining tide and submerged lands granted to the
City.
Cha74mod.doc
Item #7 C3��
ATTACHMENT 3
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY C —
r
July 8, 1994
BY THE CI -Pe CC:,;:
CIT
Y OE NE'VV (_?R 1
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council w t
JU[ I I IS ?
FROM: Bob Burnham, City Attorney
RE: Proposed BBC Legislation {
As you know, the City has asked Marian Bergeson to sponsor
legislation that would resolve the dispute regarding the Terrace
Apartments. The dispute stems from the contention of State Lands
staff that the entire Bay Club parcel consists of tidelands and
permanent residential use is not permitted on tidelands. The City,
Balboa Bay Club and State Lands agreed that this dispute would be
resolved prior to December 31, 1998, by legislation, litigation, or
boundary line agreement.
State Lands Commission staff has indicated they would be
unable to support or remain neutral on our proposed legislation
unless the City agreed to certain amendments. These amendments
include a provision that 25% of the revenue derived from the parcel
would go into a Countywide tideland fund to be administered by the
Board of Supervisors. We have advised State Lands staff that their
proposal is unacceptable and have suggested a simple legislative
solution that would give the Commission the authority to defer
resolution of dispute in conjunction with their right to review and
approve any new lease. This proposal would allow the proposed
redevelopment to proceed, with revenues from the Terrace Apartments
used to finance a portion of the project if the City and State
Lands can agree to the terms and conditions of a new lease.
State Lands staff is currently evaluating this concept and we will
communicate their position as soon as it is known.
Recommendation
C, Endorse the concept of authorizing State Lands to defer
resolution of the Terrace Apartment dispute in conjunction the
approval of the redevelopment project and a new lease.
I
RHB:wb
wb\ccbbccs.mem
ATTACHMENT 4
PO CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
U P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915
c1 e� �►- (714) 644-3131
�/FpFiN
August 11, 1994
Curtis Fossum
State Lands Commission
1807 13th Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: Balboa Bay Club (BBC)
Dear Curtis:
Kevin and I appreciate the time you took to discuss the
proposed BBC redevelopment and components of the Beacon Bay Bill.
I have attached a redraft of our legislative proposal and hopefully
the revisions are consistent with the concepts we discussed during
our meeting. As you know, Senator Bergeson is very interested in
resolving this matter during her tenure and I believe every effort
should be made to conclude the legislative process this year.
As you know, the City has retained an appraiser and a
economist to advise us on the feasibility of the proposed BBC
project and the fair market rental value of the property. We have
developed workscopes for each consultant and I will send you a copy
in the next week or so. We have also committed to keep you advised
of all significant discussions with the BBC regarding a lease
extension and to provide copies of documents relevant to the
project or the re -lease.
Finally, the City Manager and I will ask the City Council for
authority to hire Bud Uzes to conduct a thorough review of City
tidelands. We intend to contact Bob Fisher of Orange County EMA to
see if he wants to expand the scope of the Uzes study to include
County tidelands. The County may have information helpful to Mr.
Uzes and we would like a comprehensive report on all tidelands in
the upper and lower bay. We will also prepare and send to you a
detailed cost accounting of tideland revenues and expenditures.
Very duly yours,
b9aert H. Bur
RHB:gjb
City Attorney
cc:Kevin Murphy
Fossua'i. let
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach
DRAFT PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR BALBOA BAY CLUB'S TERRACE APARTMENTS
8/11/94
The People of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.Seetion-4 5 is addedtoChapter-74-8f the r=}ac�c�-vz
1978,to read.
The Legislature finds and declares as follows:
(a) By Chapter 74 of the Statutes of 1978 the Legislature
conveyed certain tide and submerged lands, in trust, to
the City of Newport Beach upon express conditions and for
certain public uses and purposes, but primarily for the
promotion and accommodation of commerce, fishing and
navigation.
(b) ^e'�in Pportions of. these tide and submerged lands
granted to City werehave been filled and reclaimed in the
1920's during the development of lower Newport Bay as a
harbor to promote and accommodate commerce fishing
recreational boating and navigation The property
described in Section 2 of this Chapter (Parcel D)
constitutes filled tide and submerged land which was
reclaimed in the course of harbor development but the
Precise character of the property was not known by the
State or the City until 1985. as a—resume of the
develepment e€-a-harber faeility. in additiems to -the
filled tide -and -submerged lands identified in Seeti-en-6
deed-as-Payeel D) has been filled and reelaimed-a-s
Bay as a harbor.
(c) Prior to discovering thatParcel D was filled tide and
submerged lands, the City leased Parcel D and adjoining
Property to a private entity who constructed a private
club on the adjoining property and a residential
apartment complex of 142 units on Parcel D The term of
this lease was extended in 1986 and the lease requires
that the use of Parcel D conform to public trust purposes
as of December 31, 1998 in the absence of legislation
litigation or boundary line agreement he= been '_cased b.
1
the Gity, develeped by the lessee as a private
residential. apartment eempl em o f 142 units, Yais
preduein}eeme --te suppertthe -GeRmeT,--Law and -t
statutery publie trust uses and purposes pursuant
Ghapter 74 ef the -Statutes -ef !978, under whz-eh the tide
(d) Since 1985, the residential apartment complex on Parcel
D has produced substantial income all of which the City
has used to directly promote and support public use of
tide and submerged lands by providing services such as
lifeguards, beach cleanup, police and fire protection and
by constructing facilities which improve the quality and
extent of public use of, and access to tide and
submerged lands.
le)_+d-- A permanent=tee residential use oft -e tide and
submerged lands, whether filled or unfilled, is in
conflict with the Common Law Public Trust and the
Legislature's intent in the statutory trust provisions of
Chapter 74 of the Statutes of 1978, if it restricts
public access to, or use of, those tide and submerged
lands.
u+e-Y Many members of the public have made the y s dent:..,
apartment complex their permanent residence, many
residents have made substantial expenditures to improve
their apartments and these residents will suffer
significant hardships if they are forced to leave their
homes on or before the December 31, 1998 deadline I-er,
many years and ha-ve -erfte te leek upen the apartments as
their hemes despite- their mete-menth eent-raetua}
-Lg)-+f+ Parcel D represents a extremely small percentage of the
tide and submerged lands granted to the City of Newport
Beach a relatively small pertien ef tTe—publ-e trust
lands in Newpert Bay, has been filled and reclaimed so
that it- is no longer submerged or below the mean high
tide line, is not,and in its present state completely
usable for public trust purposes and given the large
amount of public trust lands at the City of Newport Beach
makes available to the public Parcel D is more valuable
as a generator of revenue devoted to tideland purposes
than a parcel used to promote commerce fishing and
navigation.'
,u Public trust property adjacent to Parcel D has been
developed as a private club with extremly limited public
access. The current lessee of the private club and
Parcel D has proposed and the City has approved a
redevelopment plan which if implemented will allow full
revenue than existing uses However the current lessee
will be required to pledge revenue from the apartment
complex on Parcel D to secure the financing necessary to
implement the redevelopment plan and any uncertainty
regarding the permissible use of Parcel D would impede or
Prevent redevelopment and postpone for almost 20 years
the Publics' right of access to the adioininq_propert
li-fg-Y Givens-'_-az-aneing the potential hardships resulting from
removals of the current siders is tenants on or
before December 31,by 1998, a-nd the economic benefit to
the trust from the revenue generated by the continuing
use of Parcel D as an apartment complex, the benefits to
the public if revenue generated by Parcel D is used to
secure financing necessary to implement the redevelopment
other factors specified in these findings, the apartment
complex on Parcel D should be allowed to continue for the
duration of its useful life, until the structure is
removed or until the current or new lease expires
whichever occurs first, subject to the requirement that
all revenue be devoted to public trust uses and purposes.
e€- ub l i
etrust land
ibadl-e-€er
:sided 'ase-efPareel
publie trust use
D
'
Ferted-be
els-isle-terminate-in
anether use dul ":
2
Should Tbhe City and the current lessee shall not be
required to alter the residential use of Parcel D during
the term of the current lease. Parcel D may continue to
be used for residential purposes beyond the expiration of
the current lease, but in no event beyond December 31
2044, upon a determination by the State Lands Commission
that the revenue generated by residential use of Parcel
D Provides greater public benefit conversion to a use
consistent with the public trust or that continued
residential use of Parcel D is an integral part of the
redevelopment of the adjoining parcel and that
redevelopment will significantly accelerate public use
of, and access to, the adjoining parcel determe that
• -- -
-rM
subdivisienleve, may be--usedfer residen-tia4_<)-r
apprepriate—trus genes as will preduee t
ef Ghapter ' —e€ --the Statutes of --_3978 and—a��
Lfieally ev�i-ded i n s ubs eet i e n--( 1) b e l ew---efth
Ghapter. .
SECTION 2.-,Seetion -6 of A of the —Statutes -of 9;8
.+tP.. s.w wl Tl
crvza—vzf zaz-v-a-s—ur
That Section 4.5 is added to Chapter 74 of the Statutes of
1978 to read:
u The tide and submerged lands granted pursuant to this
statute include filled and reclaimed tide and submerged
lands legally described as (legal description) and
referred to as (Parcel D).
u Parcel D has been developed as a residential apartment
complex and generates significant revenue which has been
devoted solelv to the promotion of public trust purposes
and may continue to be used for residential purposes for
the term specified in, and, subject to the specific
conditions and provisions of this statute
former li) u The consideration received by the City for any
future lease or amendment to the current lease
which includes Parcel D shall be the fair
market rental value of the real property and
the improvements subject to any presently
existing contractual obligations so long as
the property is used for residential purposes
former (k� (dd)_ The form of any future lease or amendment of
the current lease involving Parcel D and the
consideration fair market value to be received
by the City, including the determination of
fair market rental value of Parcel D, shall be
approved by the State Lands Commission prior
to the effective date ofany such lease or
amendment_ heeeminy wffcc..zwt
c.�r-rvcr
former (11 (e_ Parcel D may continue to be used for
residential purposes until December 31 2011
Provided, however, that residential use of
Parcel D may continue until December 31 2044
or until the existing structure is removed
subiect to a determination by the City of
Newport Beach and the State Lands Commission
that:
1. The production of revenue by Parcel D which is
devoted to tideland trust uses and purposes is of greater
economic benefit to the public that conversion of the
apartment complex to a use consistent with the public
trust inherent in tidelands: or
2.
property currently developed as a private club and
redevelopment of that site will accelerate the right of
the public to use of, and access to tidelands and
significantly increase tideland revenues.Effeetive
january 1, 1995 all eney reeeived-by t}e-Gty fre e
50% inte a Gity tideland fund with the revenue used en!
trust ever the g tide and submerrejed lands granted
t o the G t y t ( 2) 25% irate- the -eity tideland eaP ita l fu
ereated by etien 2--e€ Chapter 74 ethe -Sta es o=
0
inte the Land Bank Fund er-eated-by
eetienie€ Chapter 1471 Statutes -e f !9821 subseetien
(3) funds must be expended within the Geunty ef Orange
and with the eeneurrenee ef the Orange Geunty Beard e -f
Cha74mod.d#3
AUG -17-1994 14:39
ATTACHMENT 5
the current lease which includes Parcel D shall be the then fair market rental
value of the real property and the improvements subject to any presently
existing contractual obligations so long as the property is used for residen4
riv purposes.
._ The form of any future lease or amendment of the current lease involving
Parcel D, and the consideration to be received by the City, in&dding thu
hall be approved by
the State Lands Commission prior to the e tife date of any such lease or
amendment becoming
&vailqble without re andfi cal ears fo ommission TO
BECrION 22. ;lection 6 of Chanter 74 of the Statutes of 1978 is amended by adding:
PAR `EL D (Legal Description of Faueel D)
TOTAL P.04
SENT BY:SENATE LOCAL GOUT . 8-19-94 9:04AM ; 916322x'1984 7146443139;# 3
ATTACHMENT 6
AMENDMENTS To ASSEMBLY BILL Na. 3139
AS AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 19, 1994
Amendment 1
COUNSEL: PLEASE ADD SENATOR BERGESON AS THE PRINCIPAL
CO-AUTHQX.
Amendment 2
Strike out the title and insert:
An act to add section 4.5 to, and to amend Section 6 of,
Chapter 74 of the Statutes of 1974, relating to tide and
submerged lands in the City of Newport Beach.
Amendment 3
On page 2, strike out line 1, and insert:
SECTION 1. Section 4.5 is added to Chapter 74 of the
Statutes of 1978, to road:
4.5. The Legislature finds and declares, as follows:
(a) By Chapter 74 of the Statutes of 1978, the
L�egjslature conveyed certain tide and submerged lands in
trust to the City of Newport Beach upon express conditions
and for certain public trust uses and purposes, but primarily
for the promotion and accommodation of commerce, fishing, and
navigation.
(b) Portions of there tide and submerged lands were
filled and reclaimed as a result of the implementation in the
1920's of a plan of improvement, including the development of
lower Newport Bay as a harbor to promote and accommodate
commerce, fishing, recreational boating, and navigation. In
addition t4 the filled tide and submerged lands identified in
Section 6 Of Chapter 74 of the Statutes of 1978, another
parcel as described in section 2 of this chapter (hereinafter
designated Parcel D) has been filled and reclaimed as part of
the public project of developing lower Newport Bay as a
harbor.
(o) Prior to a judicial decree in 1952 which held that
Parcel D and cartain adjoining lands ware State tidelands and
submerged lands granted to the -city pursuant to Chapter 70 of
the Statutes of 1927, the legal character of the property was
subject to some question. In 1948 the City leased Parcel D
and adjoining property to a private entity which constructed
a private club on the adjoining property and a residential
apartment complex of 142 units on Parcel D. The term of this
loase was extended in 1986 and the lease requires that the
use of Parcal D conform to public trust purposes as of
SENT BY:SENATE LOCAL GOVT 8-19-94 9:04AM 916322n2984 7146443139:# 4
2
December 31, 1998 in the absence of legislation, litigation,
or agreement with tha State Lands Commission.
(d) Since 1985, the residential, apartment complex on
Parcel D has produced substantial income, all of which the
City has used to di.rectly,promote and support public use of
tide and submerged lands held in trust by the City by
providing services to those public trust lands such as
lifeguards, beach cleanup, police, and fire protection, and
by constructing facilities which improve the quality and
extent of public us& of, and access to, tide and submerged
lands.
(e) Private residential use of tides and submerged
lands, whether filled or unfilled, is in conflict with the
Common Law Public Trust and the Legislature's intent in the
statutory trust provisions of chapter 74 of the Statutes
1978.
(f) Many members of the public have made the apartment
complex their residence for many years and have come to look
upon the apartments as their permanent homes despite their
month to month contractual tenancy.
(g) Parcel D, a relatively small portion of the public
trust lands in Newport Bay, has been filled and reclaimed so
that it is no longer submerged or below the mean high tide
line, .is not in its present state usable for publio trust
uses and purposes and, given the large amount of public trust
lands that the City of Newport Beach makes available to the
public, Parcel D 'more valuables as a generator of revenue
devoted to suppor of public trust purposes than as a parcel
used by the publi for trust purposes.
(h) Public trus property adjacent to Parcel D has been
developed as a private club with extremely limited public
accesac. The current lessee of the private club and Parcel D
has proposed, and the City has approved a redevelopment plan
which, if implemented, Will allow full public access to 95%
of the site occupied by the private club and would generate
substantially more tideland revenue from existing uses.
However, the current lessee will be required to pledge
revenues from the apartment complex on Parcel D to secure the
financing necessary to implement the redevelopment plan and
any uncertainty regarding the permissible use of Parcel D
could impede or prevent redevelopment and postpone, for.moi•-�u
almeat=20 years, the public's right of access to the
property.
(i) Given the potential hardships resulting from
removal of the current tenants on or before December 31,
1998, the economic benefit to the trust from the revenue
generated by the continuing use of Parcel D as an apartment
complex, the benefits to the public if revenue generated by
SENT BY:SENATE LOCAL GOVT ' 8-19-94 9:O5AM ; 916322"1 83 7146443139;# 5
Parcel D is used to secure financingg necessary to implement
the redevelopment plan for the adjo3.ning property which will
dramatically improve public access to tide and submerged
lands, the availability of current public facilities and the
potential needs for expanded facilities for public trust
uses and purposes and in recognition of the facts set forth
in +subdivisions (b) , (c) , , (d) , ( a) , (f ) , and (g) of this
section, and in view of the amount of public trust land
remaining in Newport Bay that in suitable for public trust
use, the current non -conforming residential use of Parcel D
may continue for the duration of its useful life, until the
structure is removed, until the current or new lease expires,
or until five years after expiration of the financing secured
by Parcel D revenues, whichever occurs first, but in no event
later than December 31, 2044, subject to the requirement that
all revenue be devoted to public trust uses and purposes as
provided in subdivision (m).
(j) should they City determine that the land use,
economic conditions, and public needs associated with Parcel
D will extend beyond the term of the present lease, the City
shall apply to the State Lands Commission for a determination
by the Commission that the continuation of this
non -conforming uae for an additianal period is in the best
interest of the public and in furtherance of public trust
purposes and needs. Should the Commission make that finding,
Parcel D may thein be leased for reeidential purposes for an
additional period, but in no event beyond December 31, 2044.
(k) The consideration received by the City for any
future lease or amendment to the current lease which includes
Parcel D shall be the then fair market rental value of the
real property and the improvements subject to any presently
existing contractual obligations so long as the property is
used for private purposes.
(1) The form of any future lease or amendment of the
current lease involving Parcel D, and the consideration to be
received by the City, shall be approved by the State Lands
Commission prior to that lease or amendment becoming
effective..
(m) Effective July 1, 19951 all money received by the
City from the existing or future lease which includes Parcel
D shall be deposited into the following tideland trust funds:
(1) 95 percent into a City tideland fund with the
revenue used only for purposes consistent with the promotion
of public trust uses, including public access, over the
remaining tide and submerged lands grantod to the City, and
(2) 5 percent into the Land Hank Fund pursuant to
subdivision (c) of Section 8625 of the Public Resources Code,
and notwithstanding Section 8613 of the public Resources
Code, the fund skull be available without regard to fiscal
SENT BY:SENATE LOCAL GOVT - B-19-94 9:06AM :
— 4 —
91632 -9B-) ?1464431:39;# 6
years for expenditure by the Commission for purposes of
providing necessary state review of management of public
trust property as provided by $+actions 6301 and 6306 of the
Public Resources Code.
wive yews A
["sn the of ective date.of any new lease or amendment to the
current lease the above revenue percentages shall be modified
so that the percentage in subdivision (1) shall be 90 percent
and the peroentage in subdivision (2) shall be 10 percent,
SEC. 2. Section 6 of Chapter 74 of the Statutes of 1975
is amended to read:
SEC. 6. The parcels of real property referred to in
this act are prescribed as follows:
PARCEL A
Beginning at Station No. B in the Line of Mean High Tide per
judgment rendered in Case No. 20436. Superior Court of C41ifOrni8,
County of Orange. recorded in Book 651, page 72 of Deeds, records
of said Qntnge County, said Station No. 8 being at the easterly
terminus of that certain souse in said Line of Mean High Tide shown
as "North 71.34' 00" West, 1373.34 Feet"' on a map of Tract No. 4003
recorded in Hook 188+ pages 13 through 19 of Miscellaneous Maps,
records of said Orange -County, said beginning being a 1'/s" iron pipe
as shown an said tamp of Tract No. 4003; thence along said Lice of
Mean High Tide, South BY 40,37' East, 606.01 feet to a point in it line
parallel with and 100,00 feet easterly from the easterly line of Lot C
as shown on a map Med in Book 9, pages 42 and 43 of Record of
Surveys, records of said Or=ge County; thence along said parallel
lim South 160.46 feet to sk point in the Ordinary High 71de Lina per
judgm,, 4t rencicTcd is Case No, a40K Suptrior C4111ct of CaliforP,
County of Orange, recorded in Book 199 pa a 276 of OfFiOW Record:
of said Orange County, said point barog the True Point of Beginning
of this description: thence along said Ordinary High Tida Line the
following Course:; North B2' 30'00" West 297.66 feet to an angle paint
therein: thence South 84' 00' 00" West, 160.00 feet: thence South 5r
04' 00' West, 100.00 feet; thence South 3,T 32' 00" East. 243.24 feet to
a line that is parallel with and distant 28,00 feet northerly, messured
at right angles, froth the U.S. Bulkhc d Luxe4 as shQwn on US -
Engineer's Map of Harbor Linea of N*Wport Bay, dated March 20.
1936, and approved April 2& 1936. thence leaving laid Ordinary high
Tide Line and along said parallel line East, 14&00 feet to the
southeasterly corner of Lot 19 a: Khowm on a map filed in Book 9,
pages 42 and 43 of Record of Surveys, records of said Orange County,,
theaw along the easterly line of said Lot 19 North 100.00 feet; thence
East 40.00 feet: thence South 100.00 feet; theme East 198,10 feat to
a line parallel with and distant 20.00 feet westerly, mesiured at right
angles from that cerWa course and southerly prolongation thereof.
recited as, "South, 160.46 feet"; thence along said parallel line North
132.00 feet; thence East 20.00 feet; thence North 104.64 feet to the
True Point of Beginning of this description.
Containing 2,694 acres, more or less.
(f) Many members of the public have made the apartment
complex their residence for many years and have come to look upon
the apartments as their permanent home despite their menth t
eentraetual the nature of their tenancy.
(g) Parcel D, a relatively small portion of the public trust
lands in Newport Bay, has been filled and reclaimed so that it is
no longer submerged or below the mean high tide line, is not in its
present state usable for public trust uses and purposes and, given
the large amount of public trust lands that the City of Newport
Beach makes available to the public, Parcel D }s may be more
valuable as a generator of revenue devoted to support of public
trust purposes than as a parcel used by the public for trust
purposes.
(h) Public trust property adjacent to Parcel D has been
developed as a private club with extremely limited public access.
The current lessee of the private club and Parcel D has proposed,
and the City has approved a redevelopment plan which, if
implemented, will allow full public access to 9754 the majority of
the site currently occupied by the private club and would generate
substantially more tideland revenue from existing uses. However,
the current lessee will be required to pledge revenue from the
apartment complex on Parcel D to secure the financing necessary to
implement the redevelopment plan and any uncertainty regarding the
permissible use of Parcel D could impede or prevent redevelopment
and postpone, for almest2G more than 17 years, the public's right
of access to the property.
ub\bbcchang.doc