Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 - Minutes - AmendedCity of Newport Beach Study Session and Regular Meeting July 13, 2021 July 27, 2021 Agenda Item No. 1 In response to Council Members' questions, Community Development Director Jurjis advised that a tiny house is another term for an ADU, deleting the term tiny house will not lead to larger ADUs, staff is not considering overlays to regulate ADUs by neighborhood but is updating the ADU program to be more permissive, and staff can discuss overlays with the Planning Commission or prepare overlays at Council's direction. He indicated staff prefers to receive the California Department of Housing and Community Development's (HCD's) comments soon so staff will have time to revise the draft Housing Element and potentially the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) process, comply with public notice and public comment requirements, and plan to submit the final draft Housing Element. He stated that an executive order by the Governor and a new State law are the only ways to extend the submission deadline, an extension could occur much closer to the deadline, submitting the draft Housing Element now does not harm the City, several nearby cities are behind the City's timeline in preparing their draft Housing Elements, and noted that the City of Coronado has submitted its draft Housing Element, reviewed HCD's comments, and decided not to complete the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) process. He related that HCD will not support an ordinance requiring more than 20% inclusionary housing, HCD has stated that the City needs to provide an opportunity for inclusionary housing, and if the City does not achieve its targets for inclusionary housing and ADUs, it will have to rezone parcels. Deputy Community 11kelopment Director Campbell indicated that the City can count pipeline projects and fifth-cy tes that did not redevelop towards its RHNA allocation, any projects filed after the effective date of an inclusionary ordinance would be subject to it, Council mayAgnsider different inclusionary percentages for different parts of the City, and the list of opportunity sites will change to reflect property owners' requests to be included or excluded. Community Development Director Jurjis added that Shopoff sent a letter, staff is evaluating the options for Newport Center, and HCD will look at whether the Housing Element policies and program uppor the planned growth. Dave Barquist, Kimley-Horn, reported it th ity of Coronado's City Council directed staff and consultants to utilize 200 uniar its RHNA allocation rather than 912 units, Murrieta, Fontana, and other cities in the I and Empire have submitted their draft Housing Elements, and Rialto, Irvine, Orange andihe County of Orange should be submitting their draft Housing Elements in the next two ofree months. Council Member Dixon commended staff, the consultant, the community, the task force, and residents for preparing the draft Housing Element and encouraged everyone to be familiar with the document. Council Membei Neill preferred not to be the first city to submit a draft Housing Element. Nancy Scarbrough, representing Good Neighbors Newport, displayed a slide to discuss the effect of density bonuses and inclusionary policy aligning with the numbers in Table B-1, and stated the community needs to understand the ramifications of an inclusionary policy and density bonuses on projects, and the City needs to craft Housing Element policies before submitting to HCD. Debra Allen, President of the Harbor View Hills Community Association, wanted the City to take as much time as possible to submit the draft Housing Element, believed an inclusionary policy should be adopted prior to areas being up -zoned, and stated seven properties subject to the site plane ordinance are interested in this housing opportunity, the draft Housing Element indicates that objective design standards cannot impede the affordable goal, the site plane ordinance limits the height and thus the density needed for affordable housing, and many of the topics need more study. Debbie Stevens, Housing Element Update Advisory Committee (HEUAC) member, thanked staff and the consultant, noted the RHNA allocation is 4,845 units but believed the numbers are at least double, preferred to focus on the numbers the City has to do, suggested putting the Volume 65 - Page 90 City of Newport Beach Study Session and Regular Meeting July 13, 2021 policies in the draft Housing Element and to look at less than the 100% buffer and the site plane ordinance, and appreciated many of the changes that were made, such as the ADUs. Jim Mosher expressed the opinion that the draft Housing Element is not ready for submittal and the electronic version is not easy to navigate, suggested placing printed copies in the library, and noted the City sent a letter to HCD regarding Banning Ranch, the plan for housing in Banning Ranch is puzzling, and policies regarding mobile home parks and mixed -use resort hotels are contradictory. Nancy Skinner preferred that the City focus on affordable housing, stay close to 4,800 units, plan for 1, 500 ADUs, submit as late as possible, and address water service to all these new units. Charles Klobe agreed with Nancy Scarbrough's comments to increase ADUs to 1,500, add inclusionary zoning at 20%, and delay submission to the fourth quarter, reviewed inclusionary rates in other cities, and questioned the rush to submit a draft Housing Element. Susan DeSantis, HEUAC member, commended Council, staff, and the consultant for their excellent work, expressed the opinion that the draft Housing Element reflects community comments and the policies and strategies will significantly address HCD's concerns, subscribed to Nancy Scarbrough's comments as a member of Good Neighbors Newport, and agreed with delaying submission, increasing ADUs to 1, 50 nd an inclusionary policy of 20% or more. She stated that there are housing needs, includingTfor seniors and young families, the public and private sectors need to address those issues with greater effort and investment, and the draft Housing Element is almost ready. Steve Ray, Banning Ranch Conservanc cussed the Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) designation and the California astal Commission's and California Supreme Court's decisions, urged Council to remove Banning Ranch from the plan, indicated the Conservancy is in the process of acquiring Banning Ranch with a permanent deed restriction for open space, and offered to assist staff and Council with resolving dilemmas. Sandra Ayrers thanked Council and the HEUAC, supported 1,500 ADUs because ADUs are preferable to small apartments, appreciated the policy for senior housing units, and asked that all neighborhoods carry the brunt of the impacts. IqW Dave Tanner referred Table B-1 and the assumption that projects will average 48.5% affordability when the historic average is closer to 5% to 10%, and recommended the City meet its affordable housing requirement with 100% affordable housing projects and negotiate down, language in the draft Housing Element support issues raised in litigation if the City supports litigation regarding RHNA allocations, revising the community profile section to include 2020 Census data and population growth projections, and delaying public comment regarding new Housing and Circulation Element policies. John Tafoya, Southwest Regional Carpenters Union, suggested the City enact policies and strategies to comply with the RHNA allocation, require projects to provide community benefits such as hiring local, require projects to exceed 2019 Green Building Codes, and revise the draft Housing Element to comply with State planning and zoning laws. Council Member Dixon agreed with comments to discuss delaying submission, 1, 500 ADUs, and the benefits of a 20% inclusionary policy. Mayor Pro Tem Muldoon stated the City has to plan for the worst -case scenario, Council will fight for Newport Beach, and believed the hoops the City has to go through are ridiculous. Council Member O'Neill shared a list of cities that submitted their Housing Elements according to the HCD website, indicated submitting the draft Housing Element in 30 days would put Volume 65 - Page 91