HomeMy WebLinkAboutG2004-0061 - Soils1 hui j 1?r
111:1 KLEINFELDER
An employee awned company
December 15, 2005
Project No. 54760
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
4040 West Coast Highway, Building 55
Newport Beach, Califomia 92663
Attention: Mr. Joseph Rodriguez
Subject: Geotechnical Observation and Compaction Testing Report
Proposed Addition to James Irvine Surgery Center
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Newport Beach, California
Dear Mr. Rodriguez:
In accordance with your authorization, Kleinfelder, Inc. (Kleinfelder) provided
geotechnical observation and field density testing services during earthwork activities
for the referenced project. This report summarizes our geotechnical observations and
the results of the in situ density tests performed during the grading operations for the
Proposed Addition to James Irvine Surgery Center at Hoag Memorial Hospital
Presbyterian. The location of the subject building pad is shown on Plate 1, Plot Plan.
The field observations and density testing covered by this report were performed by
representatives of our firm on a part-time to full-time basis between April 20, 2005 and
July 23, 2005.
REFERENCES
The following references were used during site grading:
• Supplemental Recommendations, Lateral Overexcavation Limit — North of the
addition, Proposed Addition to James Irvine Surgery Center, Hoag Memorial
Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, California. Prepared by Kleinfelder, dated
May 6, 2005, Project No. 54760/1.
• Letter of Report Review and Response to City Comments, Proposed Addition to
James Irvine Surgery Center, Hospital Road, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian,
Newport Beach, California, prepared by Kleinfelder, dated March 17, 2004, Project
No. 42171/001.
• Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Addition to James Irvine Surgery
Center, Newport Beach, California. Prepared by MACTEC Engineering and
Consulting of Georgia, Inc. for Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport
Beach, California, dated April 4, 2003, Project No. 4953-03-0931.
54760/DBA5L206 Page 1 of 3
Copyright 2005 Kleinfelder, Inc.
ki 11\1 nn 111 R F 1—(1 \.Jlc\ \ I)mr 5o'i'c 13.) Jidmnnd lids. C:\ 9lr11 41(n
December 15, 2005
nl,C �nPi Wi,-I :)a;.n
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed addition to James Irvine Surgery Center included an approximately 800
square feet one-story wood frame structure with a slab on grade floor. The estimated
maximum wall Toads are on the order of 1,000 pounds per foot. The proposed addition
is on the west side of the existing Hoag Memorial Hospital James Irvine Surgery Center.
MATERIALS/PROCEDURES
Geotechnical observation and field density/moisture tests of the engineered fill materials
were performed on a full-time basis during the precise grading operations and on a part-
time basis during associated trench backfilling. Field density testing was conducted in
general accordance with ASTM test procedures D 2922/D 3017 (Nuclear Method for
Determination of Density and Moisture). The results of tests performed at locations
selected by our on -site technician during construction are presented in Table 1,
Compaction Test Results.
Laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of the on -site and
import fill materials were conducted to evaluate the compaction characteristics of the
soils. The laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture tests were conducted
in general accordance with ASTM Standard Test Method D-1557 (Laboratory
Compaction Characteristics of Soils Using Modified Effort). The results of these tests
are presented in Table 2, Maximum Unit Weight - Optimum Moisture Content Test
Results.
GRADING OPERATIONS
The grading contractor utilized the following equipment during precise grading and
backfilling:
• Hand Operated Compaction Equipment
• Backhoe with Sheepsfoot Roller
Prior to placement of engineered fill, existing fill within the building pad was
overexcavated to depths of on the order of 2 to 3 %z feet below finished pad grade. The
overexcavation extended laterally up to 5 feet except along the north side of the pad
where existing hardscape was designated to be left in place. The materials adjacent to
the sidewalk were evaluated by our engineer to be suitable for support of the building.
Fill soils were placed in lifts not exceeding 8-inches, moisture conditioned, and
compacted by rolling with heavy equipment to a minimum of 90 percent of the
applicable maximum dry density as determined in accordance with ASTM: D 1557-91.
Fill soils consisting of on -site silty sand were placed and compacted to 90 percent
relative compaction in the building pad area. Periodic compaction tests were performed
to evaluate the conformance of the grading operations to project specifications. Areas in
which density testing indicated relative compaction below project specifications were 1)
scarified, recompacted and retested until minimum relative compaction criteria were met
or 2) removed and replaced with materials that had a moisture content near the
optimum moisture content to facilitate compaction.
54760/DBA5L206 Page 2 of 3 December 15, 2005
Copyright 2005 Kleinfelder, Inc.
KLI_INFEI DFR 1170 Valley Vista Drice, Suile 1 i0. Diamond Bar, CA 91 76i-3910 9091 VI6-11i.13 (909i 196-I S )4 iae
CONCLUSIONS
We made observations and performed periodic field density testing during the grading
operations described herein. In our professional opinion, based on observations and
test results, the earthwork observed was conducted in general accordance with the
referenced geotechnical engineering report and the project plans. The field density test
results at the locations tested are within the specified design parameters. Where testing
indicated relative compaction less than the specked design parameters, the areas were
reworked and retested. The fill soils observed and tested by Kleinfelder have been
placed and compacted in accordance with the requirements of the referenced
geotechnical report. The engineered fill discussed herein is considered to be suitable
for support of the proposed building addition.
LIMITATIONS
The services provided as described in this report include the field density testing for the
precise grading of the Proposed Addition to James Irvine Surgery Center as shown on
Plate 1. These services have been performed according to generally accepted
geotechnical engineering practices that exist in the area at this time. No warranty is
provided, expressed or implied.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact our office. We
appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project.
Respectfully submitted,
KLEINFELDER, INC.
Matthew J. Janousek
Staff Professional
ustin J. Kempton, PE, GE
Manager, Geotechnical Engineering
e�oQao143 r KE/oN4F
No.2385)611
a
*I Exp.4'10.0Z
C'e0 Cr
di4, 'ECHO a\P
F OF CAUL
Attachments: Plate 1 — Plot Plan
Table 1 — Compaction Test Results
Table 2 — Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content
cc: Scott Biehn, Kleinfelder
54760/D8A5L206 Page 3 of 3
Copyynn ht 2005 Kleinfelder, Inc.
KLI_IAI'EI�FR 13'QValle vA'isla Drive, Sri Ito 15(1, Diamond 13ar, CA 91767)-. S910 '9U9
December 15, 2005
36-O.1 5 909. 396-1124 t1y
PLATE
•
n
D D
0 0
x x
m
r n
0 9
A
o
"
CO z
C
o
N
n
9 0
D 0
0 y
00
< Z
m
0
0
2101AV1 A8 0
5
c
HOSPITAL ROAD
SIDEWALK
r
I •
W
tt
jE
co
•
DO ELI
•N
N
0
•
0
•
G • •m m NI
•
OP fan > +•
•C • WN o
• •
N
N•
O1 a
444. I • �
D m
N
•
•
-10
0
9
0
0
0
w
•
v
•
•
•
GATE
ROAD
•
831N33 Atl3Ot111S
TABLES
ymR:
" =Z
NNNN
2
NNNNNN
2
NNNN
1
N
N
r
N
r
r
r
r
00)O)
00
0)
06
00
0)
CT))
06
06
06
00
0)
0)
06
00
0)
0)
'
000)
06
0)0
06
06
0
0)
06
u0)
O
O
r
0)
O
0)
N
0)
92
88
r
0)
0)
CO
r
0)
88
Cr)
0)
06
92
O
0)
r
0)
r
0)
I
'
r
0)
89
M
0)
88
94
V
0)
M
0)
94
'+¢!"'. a
0.
co
O
r
r
120.3
0
O
r
r
120.6
O.
N
r
CO
(O
r
r
C)
0)
r
r
CO
I:
r
r
0)
0)
r
r
115.8
CO)
N
N
r
118.4
120.8
118.2
r
Oi
r
r
M
of
r
r
*
i
M
Oi
r
r
(0
(O
r
r
d'
ai
r
r
v
r
r
0)
M
r
r
O
v
r
r
to
o)
r
r
N
v
r
r
'�
C0
0 ♦.'.
�'6
{
a.. a
�
me
e...,
0
M
r
N
O
r
M
N
r
12.0
10
N
r
N
N
r
10
N
r
12.9
r
M
r
1�
O
r
M
r
r
d'
r
r
M.
r
a-
10.9
13.2
15.5
N
M
14.2
r
M
t0
"t
IO
M
O
1O
I 12.9
O
M
R a
?
N
M
N
N
i 2
N
2
2
N
r
r
N
FSG
N
V
N
r
r
r
r
r
FSG
0
(/)
_
. `
0- iLYl.c
h+vviiLL
i T i r Y X i���✓"�� ti���u M�
IE rJ7,Wt„i.,F. Test-LtrcattonBi iiui+I hu Y�oq yYa>�u�ti
West Side of the Trench
East Side of the Trench
West Side of the Trench
North Side Of the Building Pad
South Side Of the Building Pad 1
South Side Of the Building Pad
South Side Of the Building Pad
South Side Of the Building Pad
South Side Of the Building Pad
South Side Of the Building Pad
South Side Of the Building Pad
North Side Of the Building Pad
South Side Of the Building Pad
East Side Of the Building Pad
East Side Of the Building Pad
Southwest Side Of the BuildiPad
South Side Of the Buildingfad
West Side of Pad Within 5' of Side
West Side of Pad Within 5' of Side
West Side of Pad Within 5' of Side
West Side of Pad Within 5' of Side
West Side of Pad Within 5' of Side
South Section of the Pad
South Section of the Pad
South Section of the Pad
''Test
Date:
4/.21 /05
4/21/05
0
r
N
•7
4/27/05
4/27/05
4/27/05
4/27/05
4/27/05
4/27/05
4/27/05A
4/27/05
4/27/05
0
r
N
'U
4/29/05
4/29/05
4/29/05
0
N
V
5/2/05
10
00
N
10
Ip
N
10
5/2/05
IO
O
N
10
10
O
M
1O
10
O
`)
10
to
O
CO
I)
0
m
i—
CO
r
N
M
M
V
4.
0
5A
co
r
co
coii-
r
12
el
M
r
4
R
r
15
o
r-
December 15, 2005
0
c
(� c
c
J Y
ID
Q
m
-t
,0
co
It
110 0
0
r
r
r
r
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
r
r
3Z
n FrillMiipt
Required
Cbtn action
00000
O)
O)
O)
O)
0)
06
0
O)
06
06
06
0
O)
06
00
00
kAom��R@Ipactipnj
ative
CO
O)
CO
CO
CO
(3)
94
O
6)
r
CO
06
r
CO
0
O
r
W
N
W
r
O)
Cc)
O)
Cal
O)
O
f0
r
r
I"-
r
r
114.3
118.0
O
r
r
N
r
r
)n
O)
r
r
r
CO
r
r
N
O)
r
N
O
N
r
O
co
r
r
r
co
r
r
CO
N
r
r
�:.
„I
r
r
n
Cc;
r
co
N
r
r
N
r
(O
N
r
14.4
0)
(7
r
14.2
Cl
r
r
f�
r
r
O
N
r
11.5
r
N
r
CO
(V
r
r
N
r
ce—
OS,
v
FSG
FSG
(0
FSG
r
u_
FSG
FSG
)�L
FSG
FSG
LPL
)NL
FSG
4,.
c
0
m
0
0
m0
West Section of the Pad
West Section of the Pad
North Section of the Pad
North Section of the Pad
East Side, North Section
East Side, North Section
East Side, North Section
Center Section of the Pad
Center Section of the Pad
Center Section of the Pad
Center Section of the Pad
`Center Section of the Pad
�� North Section of the Pad
North Section of the Pad
M
co
FQ
5/3/05
5/3/05
5/3/05
5/3/05
5/3/05
5/3/05
15/3/05
O
v
u)
15/4/05
1.0
O
v
)n
15/4/05
5/4/05
5/4/05
to
O
v
in
NOR)
wZr
O)
r
O
N
N
N
N
en
N
24
)f)
N
26
r--
N
coO
N
N
O
M
31
December 15, 2005
Table 2 - Laboratory Test Results
Maximum Unit Weight - Optimum Moisture Content Test Results
1
SM
Reddish brown Silty Sand trace clay
121.5
12.0
2
SM
Reddish brown Silty Sand with gravel
131.0
9.0
pcf = pounds per cubic foot
54760/DBA5L206
Copyright 2005 Kleinfelder, Inc.
T2 —1 December 15, 2005
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CIVIL ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION FORM
From: Adkan Engineers
6820 Airport Drive
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Blvd.
P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915
ATTENTION: GRADING ENGINEER, BUILDING DEPARTMENT
GPC No.: G2004-0061 Tract/Subdivision/Lot No.: N / A Rough Final X X
Project Names: James Irvine Surgical Center @ Hoag Hospital
Owner/Developer: H (la g H n s p 1 r a 1
Type of Project:
- Tract - Drainage
- Commercial X X - Other
- Industrial
Yardage for Project:
Cut
Fill
- Borrow
Export
Date:
Riverside, CA 92504
Diceamber 05, 20n5
I hereby approve the grading for this project in accordance with my responsibilities under the City Grading Code. I
have inspected the project and hereby certify that all areas exhibit positive surface flow to public ways or City approved
drainage devices. The grading has been completed: 12-05-05 in conformance with, with
the following changes to the approved grading plan.
Description of Changes:
Company: Adkan Engineers
Name: _Gary L, Akers
(rim)
.:
R C E 23713
License No(RCE/LS)
Fi F(enom.mi i-90
3300 Newport Boulevard • Post Office Box 1768 • Newport Beach, California 92658-8915
Telephone: (949) 644-3275 • Fax: (949) 644-3250 •Website: wmncnewport-heach.caus/building
e-mail: enb_blgcity.newport-beach.ca.us
JN tUi
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
3300 NEWPORT BLVD.
P.O.BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
(949) 644-3275
SETBACKS AND TOP OF SLAB/FLOOR
ELEVATION CERTIFICATE
The purpose of this certificate is to insure that the structure is located properly on site per the approved
drawings. This certificatc also verifies the top of slab/floor elevation noted on the approved drawings.
After the top of slab/floor elevation is verified to match the elevation specified on the approved drawings,
the contractor and inspector can measure the height of the structure to the top of slab/floor to verify that it
is equal or less than the dimension shown on building sections and elevations.
This form must be filled out by a registered surveyor or civil engineer authorized to perform surveys. The
survey must be done after the concrete forms are in place or preferable after the concrete slab is poured or
raised floor is built, but prior to starting wall framing.
Engineer/Surveyor's Name
Charissa Leach, P.E. License it 53390
6820 Airport Drive, Riverside. CA 92504
Engineer/Surveyor's Address
Job Address Hoag Hospital, 1 Hoag Drive Newport BHach. CA 92658-6100
Setbacks: Sketch a site plan and specify surveyed setbacks (use back page).
Top of slab/floor elevation: 81.00
* If slab/floor elevation varies, sketch a plan or section through stab on the back page and specify the
elevations. Use same datum used in the survey of record.
I certify that the setbacks are €' , are not U, per City approved plans. Describe any deviations
from plans:
T certify that top of slab/floor elevation(s) iska, is not ❑, per City approved drawings. Describe
any deviations from plans:
Date
s/ v$or
Fo,ms/Elevanoncetc
Engineer/Surveyor's stamp and si
n.
1W1
. SURVEYING •.p
GRADE SHEET FOR .K.-re -g21--s4
DATEJOB NO 61172n TRACT NO STREET .
GRADES FROM PLAN NO• DATE REVISED TO FB PG
GRADES FOR STAKES ARE SET
Grades are given from top of stakes or nails in feet and hundredths of a foot. The term sewer grades refers to flow line of pipe. Cuts
and fills are normally marked on lath for contractor's convenience only. and are not to
be used
9f for
nt of construction.nWhen and on using grade
stakes, contractor shall observe the following rules: (1) Three (3)consecutive points
• line must be used in canon; (2) When a discrepancy is found, it must be reported to this office immediately, otherwise this office
cannot be held responsible for any error in the grade of the finished work.
All grade sheets and stakes are void after 30 days.
TEL (g00/'6#97024 f • FAA:. (909090-0999
mailOadkarze to -
OF
B.M
•
/<ow
L.S.
STAKES SE1' BY Tki COMP. BYtsIEHKED- BY
00
.iz41;
esi
d-
voN tots
vgv
Gxrsf.
Eft -b‘:-7.
€1�Ft
ASSt rME