HomeMy WebLinkAboutI-2 - Library Exchange AgreementT Y
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
June 6, 1990
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Robert H. Burnham
SUBJ: Library Exchange Agreement C--2-,F7_3
I -2
BY THE CFTC
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
1 1 1990
1 rlfsC111` .
The City Council has twice considered, and commented on, the
proposed Library Exchange Agreement. The proposed Agreement has
been revised to respond to Council concerns and the revisions are
shown on the pages attached to this memo. The modifications can be
summarized as follows:
1. Civic Plaza Development Approvals.
The additional entitlement in Civic Plaza must be
planned and constructed at intensities similar to existing
development.
2. Newport Village Development Approvals.
Transferred entitlement must be planned and
constructed as existing development, must conform to the Newport
Center Sight Plane, and the Council has modified site plan review
authority. TIC must comply with the TPO, but the traffic analysis
shall assume completion of Pelican Hill Road and other major
improvements. TIC may begin construction of, but not occupy,
transferred entitlement prior to completion of Pelican Hill Road.
The City is required to expedite completion of a double right turn
lane at the northeasterly corner of San Joaquin Hills Road and
MacArthur Boulevard - the only Newport Beach improvement necessary
to comply with the TPO according to preliminary analysis.
3. Subdivision Maps.
Minor, non - substantive amendments conform TIC's
obligations to comply with map conditions to limitations on our
authority to impose conditions.
I,
os)
— a —
Power of Termination.
TIC is required to fully reimburse COP holders
preliminary to any exercise of its power to terminate our interest
in the New Library Site in the event the City is in default.
The revised Exchange Agreement still obligates the Council to
override the TPO if necessary to approve additional Civic Plaza
entitlement. Assuming TIC satisfies its obligations, the Council
has no right to terminate the Agreement. There is no provision for
reconveyance of the Old Library Site if, after closing, the City
decides not to proceed with the construction of the New Library
and, in that event, TIC has the right to terminate our interest in
the new site as well. The Council should be fully committed to
override the TPO and construct the New Library prior to approval of
the Agreement.
RECOMMENDATION•
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor
and City CleXk to execute the New Central Library Exchange and
Transfer Agreements subject to final approval by bond ccunsel_
Robert H. Burnham
City Attorney
RHB:jg
Attachments
0V
CITY COUNCIL
BY THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item No.}-
CRY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH _T - Z
JUN 1 X990 i BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
APPRO Y ED May 14, 1990 %SAY I e 1990 1
Y
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
BY THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: City Manager CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
SUBJECT: LAND EXCHANGE AGREEMENT/
NEWPORT CENTER LIBRARY MAY 2 91990
C - z 'qa3
For a number of months staff of the City has 'been meeting with
representatives of The Irvine Company to negotiate the terms of the Land
Exchange Agreement in Newport Center to permit the construction of
approximately a 50,000 sq.ft. library in the vicinity of MacArthur Boulevard
C and PCH. The agreement is now on the agenda for City Council review and
approval. The basic provisions of the proposed Land Exchange Agreement are
as follows:
1. The City of Newport Beach will exchange the current site
on San Clemente Drive consisting of 1.97 acres for a two acre site between
MacArthur Boulevard and Avocado Avenue north and adjacent to the new art
museum site.
2. The Irvine Company will give to the City an additional two
acres north and adjacent to the two acres referenced in No. 1 above. In
essence, The Irvine Company is exchanging approximately two acres for two
acres, and making a gift of two acres which will have the effect of making
available four acres between MacArthur Boulevard and Avocado Avenue for a
library site.
3. The exchange and gift will be accomplished through an
escrow with 1st American Title Insurance Company.
4. The City will be responsible to prepare the subdivision
documents for the new site and The Irvine Company will be responsible to
prepare the resubdivision documents for the old site. Each party shall
cooperate with one another in preparing the necessary subdivision
documents.
5. The exchange and gift land will contain specific land use
restrictions giving The Irvine Company the first right of refusal and /or
option to repurchase the exchange and gift property if the City in the future
does not utilize the land for library purposes and decides to sell the property.
f � ,
-2-
6. On or before ten business days prior to the closing of
escrow The Irvine Company shall have obtained from the City of Newport
Beach all discretionary land use approvals necessary to construct 65,550
square feet of office space on the old library site and adjacent property owned
by The Irvine Company. If necessary, the City will grant an override to the
Traffic Phasing Ordinance to permit the construction of 65,550 square feet of
office development. The Irvine Company, however, shall pay all fair share
fees, transportation corridor fees, building excise tax fees, and other fees
required for construction projects.
7. The Irvine Company shall have the right at its sole
discretion to transfer entitlements currently existing on the Newport Village
site (between MacArthur and Avocado) to the Corporate Plaza Planned
Community or Corporate Plaza West. To develop the entitlements an override of
the Traffic Phasing Ordinance is not required. However, recognizing that the
City's proposed library is 50,000 square feet, the Agreement states that the
library shall be considered a committed project and traffic generated by the
new library shall not be included in the Traffic Phasing Ordinance analysis
for the Newport Village entitlements. For each square foot of Newport Village
entitlement that satisfies the TPO an additional square foot shall be deemed to
comply with that standard up to a total of 100,000 square feet of entitlement
((y (50,000 sq.ft. x 2). The balance of the 115,000 square feet of entitlement shall
be subject to full compliance with the TPO. The Irvine Company shall pay all
development costs such as fair share fees, transportation corridor fees,
building excise taxes, etc.
8. City shall submit grading, landscaping, hardscaping, and
exterior construction of the library including support streets, driveways, curb
cuts, entryways, sidewalks, parameter walls, fences, irrigation, drainage
systems, monument, directional and other signs, and all like improvements on
the new library land to The Irvine Company for review. The Irvine Company
has the right of review and approval of the City's plans, but must exercise
reasonable discretion consistent with certain design criteria already approved
by the Library Board.
9. City shall have the right to lease the old library site for up
to thirty -six months while the new library is being constructed. This will
assure continued service by the Library Department. If the Orange County
Assessor's office does not grant an exception to The Irvine Company for the old
library site, the City shall pay taxes during the period in which the City leases
the old library site. The rental fee shall be $1.00 per year.
(( 10.
After
opening
of escrow The Irvine Company and City will
\ each be responsible
to obtain the
necessary title policies deemed advisable and
necessary. If the
title
policies
reveal some undesirable feature, each party
shall work diligently
and
in good
faith to resolve the problem. If the problem
cannot be resolved,
the
Land Exchange Agreement can be terminated.
t
0
-3-
r
11. City agrees to pay a pro rata share of roadway and
infrastructure improvements on MacArthur Boulevard and Avocado Avenue.
12. All escrow and closing costs shall be shared 50/50 between
The Irvine Company and City.
13. The Irvine Company may cancel the subject agreement if
(a) discretionary approvals are not received for the entitlements on Newport
Village (between MacArthur and Avocado); (b) discretionary approvals are not
received for the Civic Plaza site (old library site); or (c) conditions of
agreement are not met by City. This condition is of some concern inasmuch as
the City will have committed substantial funds for architectural fees.
While the attached agreement poses some risks inasmuch as the
City will commit for architectural fees, it is believed that with the good
intentions of The Irvine Company and the City, unseen problems can be
resolved and the project proceed. The. Irvine Company is committed that an
appropriate library is constructed. The City is committed that an appropriate
library is constructed. With this underlining commitment by both agencies, I
believe the agreement provides the security that is needed. While the
agreement does not represent 100% of the ideas of the City for the Land
Exchange Agreement, it does represent a negotiated compromise with The
Irvine Company. This compromise is considered acceptable by the City's staff
responsible for these negotiations. Much has been changed from the original
text that favors the City. Certainly the land value of $7.4 million for the new
site versus $3.4 million for the old site favors the City. As an interesting aside,
the City purchased the old site for $279,500 in 1975.
Finally the law firm of Brown .& Divert, recognized authorities in
the sale of certificates of participation, have been provided a copy of these
land exchange documents. It is their opinion that the documents will permit,
with little or no penalty against the City, the sale of certificates of
participation as anticipated by the City. However, they desire to review the
Agreement again and possibly make recommendations for modification to
make certain that the Agreement does not jeopardize a favorable interest rate.
r�
ROBERT L. WYNN
RLW:kf
Attachment