Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSS3 - Financial Evaluation and Framework for Future Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (PA2022-045) - PowerPoint•I I l:l rYM ■ 1011&." 1 Ito :1y[•]lrlItem rlkillld: •1110KNIE ►`12111 4y 1 i nr y ) n City CounFil Chambers March 22 4,giQ22 r PO Framewc DN r PO Background • September 14., 2021— Council Study Session o Directed staff to study financial implications of inclusionary housing o Return with recommendation on percentage • Adopted Housing Element Policy Action 1K o Interim policy within 6 months of HE adoption o Base inclusionary requirement of 15% o Study and adopt ordinance within 36 months What is "inclusionary" housing? A local ordinance that requires a pre -determined share of new housing units be affordable to persons of very low-, low-, and/or moderate incomes No Inclusionary Requirement 100 Market -Rate Units No Affordable Units C 10% Inclusionary Requirement 90 Market -Rate Base Units 10 Low -Income Units 20 Market -Rate Density Bonus Units Why discuss Inclusionary? Airport Area Banning Ranch Coyote Canyon West Newport Dover -Westcliff Newport Center ADUs, Pipeline, and 5t" Cycle Low-, Very -Low, Moderate 976 591 536 443 183 949 729 Total 2,440 1,475 1,530 1,107 458 2,374 2,229 Totals 4,396 11,613 Ir Annual Production: I = 4,396 = 8 (Years) = 550 Affordable Units /Year InclusionaryHousing? 0-0 �. Developers can utilize Density Bonus law to boost density. F_M If a developer does not want to use Density Bonus law then what inclusionary (%) requirement would the City would impose? State Density City's Inclusionary Bonus law OR Ordinance • Boost in Density When will this apply • Development Incentives What type of projects? • Development Waivers / NS%S,., • Reduced parking o In-Lieu Fee $ State Density Bonus Law • Incentive to develop affordable housing on- site with project • Entitled to : Bonus units • Development Incentives • Development standard waivers • Reduced parking 9 5 20 6 22.5 7 25 8 27.5 9 30 10 32.5 11 35 12 38.75 13 42.5 14 46.25 15 50 10 20 10 5 15 27.5 15 10 24 50 44 50 Financial Evaluation Pararnetl • Keyser Marston hired to perform a financial evaluation • Pro Forma analyses prepared of prototype residential developments • Evaluation of housing opportunity areas r Banning Ranch West _ ! , w Dover - Ne Westcliff e. C Airport Area Pro Forma Evaluation Tests F,gr�; • The requirement should balance the interest of property owners and developers against the public benefit created by the production of affordable housing units. • The legal standards are: • The requirements cannot be confiscatory; and • The requirements cannot deprive an owner of a fair and reasonable return on their investment. EvA ,&ation Standards Reduction in property values 25% max Increase in market sales prices and rents 6% max Our Previous Ordind, Applicability of Affordable Income Distribution In -Lieu Option "$" Alternatives Other Notes All for -sale projf 15% 15% very -low, low-, or moderate - incomes $18,,500 increased to $28,954 Off-site construction, land dedication, off-site conversion Repealed in 2013 Supportable Requirement Rental projects can support: P, Inclusionary Low Income Unit In -Lieu Fee/ Unit I $36,690 $34,790 $60,990 $37,660 In -Lieu Fee/ SF $38.30 $36.60 $50.30 $38.50 Supportable Requirement Ownership projects can Support: Inclusionar Moderate Income Units In -Lieu Fee / Unit In -Lieu Fee/ SF $59,720 $86,450 $218,420 $70,820 $37.00/SF $40.00/SF $86.30 $33.80/SF Southern California Examples Irvine All units 15% Y 5% very low / 5% low / 5% Moderate Huntington 3+ units 10% Y Rental units: low income / For Sale: moderate Beach income San 6+ units c 15 /o Y Rental: 7.5% very low / 7.5% low Clemente For Sale: 3% very low / 4% low / 8% moderate Carlsbad 7+ units 15% Y Units not to exceed 80% of MFI for County Encinitas 7+ units 10-15% Y Rental: 15% if low, 10% very low Owner: 15% if low, 10% very low Y Rental: 20% very low, low or moderate Pasadena All units 20% Owner: 5% very low, 5% very low or low, 10% very low, low or moderate Solana 5+ units c 15/ Y Rental: 15% very low and/or low Beach Owner: 15% Beverly 10+ 10% Y 10% very low, low or moderate Hills Possible Ordinance .1 o Applicability: ■ All residential projects with net increase of units o Minimum inclusion %: Rental: 7% (in -lieu option: 50 units or less) ■ Ownership: 8%; 5% NC (in -lieu option: all projects) o In -Lieu Fee: ■ Rental projects 50 units or less ■ Based on geography and product type (e.g. Rental in Newport Center) ■ Based on rental or saleable floor area (per SF fee) ? o Allow additional alternatives: off-site construction of affordable units ■ conversion of existing units ■ dedication of land Schedule April 12, 2022 — HCD to release comment letter on City's Housing Element April 26, 2022 —City Council Study Session on HCD comments Inclusionary Housing: Financial Evaluation and Future Framework CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Vol,MAIO Elm Thank you. � I �f Jf J Questions . J 1• f f �l Jae 4 Seimone Jurjis Community Development Director Kathe Head Keyser Marston Associates Jaime Murillo Principal Planner FlA f kS I imurillo@newportbeachca.gov of -f .{ -�✓� - } Y k