The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutX2021-1810 - Alternative Material & Methods (2)a xaozk-\%ko CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION 100 Civic Center Drive I P.O. Box 1768 1 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 www newoortbeachca aov 1 (949) 644-3200 ��A. 6 u JvN C ✓. 4� ✓ C� REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION TO PROVISIONS- OF TITLE 9 (FIRE CODE) OR TITLE 15 (BUILDING CODE) FOR STAFF USE Y 'iLJ. ,� — y -- Plan Check # I$(eo- 20914 of Ste isN`t �`J�j�-- OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (See Reverse for Basis for Approval) (Fee $276) REQUEST Occupancy Classification Use of Building $ FOR ALTERNATE MATERIAL OR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION # of Units Project Status L) (See Reverse for Basis for Approval) (Fee $276) Construction Type V & REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM DISABLED Verified by ACCESS DUE TO PHYSICAL OR LEGAL No. of Items j Fee due CONSTRAINT (Fee $1,535) (Ratification by the Board of Appeals will be required.) DISTRIBUTION: ❑ Owner Plan Check For above requests, comp/etc Sections 1, 2 8 3 ❑ Petitioner ❑Inspector below by printing in ink or typing. ❑ Fire ❑Other 1 JOB ADDRESS: PETITIONER ADDRESS SITE ADDRESS: 438 Angelita Drive Petitioner Roy Reed (Engineer) Owner Greg Gabriel (Petitioner to be architect o eeagineer) Address 3615 Seabreeze Lane Address 7727 Caminito Liliana Newport Beach, CA Zip 92625 San Diego, CA Zip 92129 Daytime Phone ( ) Daytime Phone (760 ) 586-8121 2 REQUEST: Submit plans if necessary to illustrate request. Additional Sheets or data may be attached. orrosion protection of steel soldier piles in direct contact being achieved by use of carboline epoxy coating. 3 USTIFICATION/FINDINGS OF EQUIVALENCY: CODE SECTIONS: See attached product spec sheet. A small portion of soldier beam web/flange section does not have concrete cover because of the need to install lagging. Corrosion protection is rovided through the use of carboline epoxy aint. Petitioner's Position Principle Engineer Signature CA Professional Lic. # C80503 Date 9/1/2021 FOR STAFF USE ONLY DEPARTMENT ACTION: In accordance with: ❑ CBC 104.11/CFC 104.9 ❑ CBC 104.10/CFC 104.8 (Alternate materials & methods) (CBC Modification) ❑ Concurrence from Fire Code Official is required. ❑ Approved ❑ Disapproved ❑ Written Comments Attached BY: Date ❑ Request (DOES) (DOES NOT) lessen any fire protection requirements. ❑ Request (DOES) (DOES NOT) lessen the structural integrity The Request is Granted ❑ Denied (See reverse for ❑ Granted (Ratification required) appeal information) Conditions of Approval: Signature Po tionCHIEF BUILDING OFFICl/tte 1 3 O2 Print Name APPEAL OF DIVISION ACTION TO THE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS (See Reverse) (Signature, statement of owner or applicant, statement of reasons for appeal and filing fees are required.) CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER: 1-0 01 t LS Ill F.micniodif 11102/2016 Xt02A'1$ (1) Guidelines for Approval of Alternate Materials Design and Methods of Construction Basis For Approval For the Chief Building Official and Fire Code Official or their designated agent to approve a request for modification or a request for alternate material or method of construction, he/she must determine that special, individual reasons exist that make compliance with the strict letter of the Code impractical and that equivalency is provided. The resulting condition must be in conformance with the spirit and purpose of the Code provisions involved and that such modification does not lessen fire protection, structural integrity or occupant safety. The applicant must provide sufficient information with this application to allow the above evaluation to be made. Requirements for Submittals The applicant design professional shall prepare a Written Report that describes the alternate proposal along with the applicable data listed below:, I ` ' • State specific code provisions for which alternative is requested and why request is being submitted. • Describe by code section those provisions for which alternative is desired. • Compare the proposed 'alternative' versus the code requirements in terms of structural strength, suitability, effectiveness, fire resistance, safety and health impacts affecting the building or user of the building. • Demonstrate that the proposed alternative is compatible with balance of code requirements. • When applicable, specify how authoritative consensus document(s) are used to substantiate proposal. (Reference draft ICC Building Performance Code Commentary Section 1.4.2.3 for background information). • Provide assumptions, references, and documentation of evaluation methods utilized. This includes intended use, input data, anticipated outputs, and limitations of computer models and other analytical tools or methods. • Specify when and where special inspection and testing are required and the standards of acceptance for demonstrating compliance. Show how the proposed alternate, if accepted, will be identified on the job site. • Where land use restrictions and building setbacks are required, deed restrictions may be an appropriate method to ensure continued compliance. • State how and where alternate proposal is Incorporated within construction plans and prepare plan amendments as necessary. The design professional has the responsibility to coordinate all construction documents and ensure compatibility between documents. • The report and design documents shall be dated, signed and stamped by the design professional according to the plan submittal procedure. • For alternate methods of design requests, the applicant shall set performance criteria for his design. Performance criteria shall be reviewed, amended and approved by the Building or Fire Code Official prior to start of design. Alternative Design ReviewfVerification The Chief Building Official or Fire Code Official has the responsibility to review design submittals for compliance to the adopted codes and procedures. If the Building or Fire Code Official does not have the expertise on staff to make a thorough and competent review, the Building or Fire Code Official shall select a consultant that possesses the necessary qualifications to perform a third -party or peer review. Cost of peer review shall be paid by applicant to the Building Division prior to commencing the review. • Verify that all applicable information and justifications listed above as requirements for submittals is received and verify that evaluation and design methods used by designer are appropriate to the alternative proposed. • Verify products are being used in accordance with their listing conditions as required by recognized listing agencies. If not available, require documentation and/or testing to demonstrate compliance with intent of code and intended use. • Evaluate performance of material and possible flaws that could affect performance of material in its installed state. • The reviewer shall document that the submittal has been reviewed and accepted as meeting the alternative materials, design and methods of construction provisions of the code. If the Building or Fire Code Official is not satisfied that the applicant has met the conditions, the request should be denied in writing with the applicable reason(s). Inspection/Field Verification The alternate proposal as approved in the construction documents must be verified by inspection, and, where necessary, testing as follows: • To verify that alternate materials, systems and fabricated products comply with accepted design criteria and the manufacturer's and engineer's installation procedures, inspectors should check product labeling, certification, quality assurance processes, and testing, as applicable. • When appropriate, an approved third party quality assurance inspection and testing service may be required for continuous and complex inspection and testing activities. This is intended to verify that construction complies with the code and the approved plans. Appeal from the determination or action of the Chief Building Official or Fire Code Official or their designated agent may be made to the Building and Fire Board of Appeals. To appeal, the applicant must provide special individual reasons that make compliance with the strict letter of the Code impractical. Appeals or ratifications pertaining to State Disabled Access Standards require complete evidence to substantiate that the proposed design is equivalent to that prescribed by that standards or that due to'legal 'or"physical constraints, compliance with the standards or providing equivalency would create an unreasonable hardship. - Appeals must be submitted on the Appeal Form available at Permit Counter accompanied by the proper fee. You will be notified in writing of the appeal hearing's time and date. EXISTING RESIDENCE I L 1/� 4 O —` — IDL PROPERN LINE (SEEELELA DN)OPERTY LINE SEE ELEVpTON FOR SPACING i EPDXY COAT ENTIflE BACK MNGE VOIDSh9'OF WEB, E9INC ZES IN TOE TIMBER WGGINI FILL CONCRETE TE OR L\GGING WITH [ONCgETE TOE "H"r I 5 11 TI LEAN CONCRETE OR COMPACTED $OIL 6"MIN. _ WATER REPORTING- PROPOSED TEMPORggy "" _ B DRAINAGE BOARDS REINING (SEE SHEET 5X2) BY OTHERS) PROPOSED SUBTERMNEAN - ' 1 - BUILDING WALL (BY OTHERS) J _ — BLOCK 0 RY TIMBER ,. BURN HOLES THROUGH SOLDIER BLOOM OUTS PIACED qT --- 2 CLR'J BUILDING WALL LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT INTERIOR FACE OF WALLEON MIN BEAM WEBS FOR LONGINGLUAL RD— TO ARUL I URAL DRAWINGS) F SOLDIER BEAM REMOVAL RESAR(1"DN.M ., SHORING(SEESHEETRH3) I CUT E REMOVE PROTRUDING WEB E MNGE UPON COMPLL ONOFNEPROPOSEDSTRUCTIIIANO)OR INSTALI6 RFA,OVE NP OF SOIdIEq BEAMS p16 FOR 45 DIRECTED BYTHE STRUCNRAL ENGINEER OF _ BL.PKLATON OF ppOPOSED SITE WALL RECORD. FILLALL VOIDS WITHCN APPROVED PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL = _ BLOCK OUT SOLDIER BEAMS p)-Ij AS SHOWN, NON /y I SHRINK GROUT ACCORDING TO PROJECT _ II I\ �� SPECIFI[pTONS. PER TT:MPORARY 1.1 SLOPE `PROPERTY LINE F=t— hWNENTLY ENCASED SOLDIER BEAM PUN DETAIL -SB# 7-13 (BY OTHE a =+• 4 - — — Rs TYPICAL) 1 �4J I I -I " — — - RE UEST FOR ALTERNATE MATERIAL T 21 ASNALLPORTION OFSOLOIER 06VAS XJ9J BEAA1)FWNGESECTION GOES NOT E411 CONCRETE COVER BECAUSE OFTXE NEED TO INSTgLL LiGGING. CORROSION PROTECTION IS PROVIpfD THROUGH THE USE OF A I CARBOLINE PROXY PAINT, AS 1H0`NN IN DETAIL 2)SH,0 y:�- TG1PORgflY 1 1 SLOPE IBY OTHERS TYPICAL) _ /0 R 1O 20 �i0 CIiAPHIC SCPLE/t" fdrCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH I {^r%) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1, „AMc UIL.TDOWDRIC, C m " w9 PIUS IN 1 0,P9 Cp5E N0,: K`AA— FOR etl Ta PARAA-P oe og OF x'F NNAASnz ePA� °.Ie° E:O �oo.I Dae< � NE4E,9i ANR"wIN' ISIPAFIC . co FAA PAID %.FarvmuP 4F �mrgppue9 z 9ee AT, I ry e. ur �nmu� HAD N+�meNerx,�emanPAWAL OR�cvn0. sEo..stsu] n P slow 6Y I. A.,n I ITolz ,]69 p Fre ppNceLO�F PICK LjIM I.. PII11cU (� `O"`• `P. ❑APP,a.a ❑D'eP w..a m Kae m PROPERTYLINI MATING RESIDENCE C�b®e Carboguard® 890 jjjjnw Carboguard® 890 noxlw:u AN w4 O�sK T^•i anum.u'z _ m o0" . eirto�e .m.M �.�.... ..._ ....m.,m.,�. .,.....,,,_, NO ui. w..w a..ne vm u rw wnrenm vw.. a.aowu., Wam a AnaP. AN n,ot n ,m ,,,. a,ummxm o. e.e.vm e rvvvsamm nt ae sue.. PAT "� "4lua wN� +v „ an IAA d nu .,. m, x nmaon oz AK. il emeral IdY amr..ew In ounavnPT wrxM9 f'tWP z.,, A' R T ,+P—PA—A..,....c,nwm nm. o,wan.emi,`,,,imy AGO= n. PA PIPES carbo„ ee _.n m.. . AA. a, SHORING DESIGN GROUP �� )J GM,INITOI(760S $AN OIEGO, Cp 9$139, (J60)586 B1)1 I1-22-2021 Mm I II SHEET cu n a4 EXISTING RESIDENCE PROPOSED TLI10 ARY J SHORING (SEE SHEET SH2) l JJJ _ PROPOSED INABO ARY SHORING (SEE SHEET SH31 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL 1 v 1 f T A J (BYMOTHERS 1 1 SLOPE - 21 TEMPORARY 1 1 SLOPE I YOTHERS —CALI v= °+PROPOSED GUEST HOUSE /' PROPERT' GUSHING NCSIW.CE — Know what's below, Call before you dig. DR9 At ERTII TWO WORKIN VS SEFO0.E ALL IXISTING UTILRIES ... NOTOESHOWN ON THESE PLAN$ DIG ALERT GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE 1 POTHOLE (AS NEEDED). ALL EXISTING UTNTIES BEFORE SHORING WALL CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. STAT OF A IFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETE AND HEALTH TRENCH/EXCAVATION PERMIT NO. l.T PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT SYMBOL TEMPORARYSOLDIERREAM I TEMPOURY TIMBER LAGGING SOLDIER BE" COUNT �PROPEAIY LINE P .. DETAIL/SECTION CANGETS % SX% 3,12 DFQ TIMBER LAGGING SHORING DESIGN GROUP �� 712LILIANA AN OIEGO CAMINITO . CA 92129, (76p)5B60121 LEGEND T.O.W.. TOP OF WALL B. D.W = BOTTOM OF TEMPORARY SOLDIER BEAM WALL (BOTTOM OF LAGGING) BY OTHERS- WORK OUTSIDE SHORING SCOPE BE)PROPOSED (E)=EXISTING SCOPE OF WORK TEMPORARY SOLDIER BEAM SHORING WALL. APPROXIMATELY 162 LF AND AN IXPOSEp SURFACE AREA TOTALING 2,090 SQUARE FEET, AS SHOWN IN SHEETSSH M5 HEREIN. I[ New CunOm Hums 11 11-23-2021 SHEET SS1 D .C.fB50R I„D21 IX3'BI3 DAf (all H—1