HomeMy WebLinkAbout10 - Appeal of a Limited Term Permit for the Aeronutronic Ford Soil Vapor Remediation (PA2022-0180) - PowerPoint (Applicant)July 25, 2023
Item No. 10
July 25, 2023
City of Newport Beach City Council Meeting
WSP Earth & Environment
• Kenn Conner, PE — Senior Vice President/West Regional Site
Investigation & Remediation Leader
• Mike Barnes — Project Manager
Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board — State of California
• Jessica Law, PG — Engineering Geologist
Bayridge Homeowners Association (HOA)
• Enrique Sanchez —President
• Gayle Weinberg —Treasurer
• The LTP was needed due to aesthetic issues, i.e., < 8 ft setback
• Space is very limited
• WSP is the owner of the LTP application
• HOA's input was considered, but engineering, implementation
and power availability determined the location
• All potential locations were vetted and then narrowed down to
7 locations. Of these 7, only one meets the needs for the
project
• WSP/Ford has performed extensive community outreach
• Most important, this project is needed in an urgent manner
• Vapor Intrusion exists in 22+ homes
• SVE is the only remediation technique to address the risk
• Main appellant no longer owns the property at 94 Hartford
Investigation area
boundary
Approximate former
Aeronutronic Facility
boundary
Approximate location of
former facility buildings
Approximate formerATC
area
Creek
Historical arroyo (back -
filled during development)
Former Ford
Aeronutronic Facility
Big Canyon
Arroyo Area
0.5
■ Miles
Upper
NewBay
♦ Ar
r
r � 1
Main. 1
iA rea'�
,�
. %""
Former
ATC Area
I
San Diego Cr.
1
North
Area
Areas to be
Remediated
f j Blron Ave
51 'a
S
1
�l r
l
I I
9ra�ei-y �-
4
S+?atJprnugh {
1
�
I
J
Snmin irq.�,r nNx wm i«aM
s—F1' mprcg—
onr rr rscm m-�i anarc loop Lcrm
nsaeenrq lrrcl coMmlolze sarrgLlg
psc�asre sr in roars=
w,su,x ealrx nngnxm �romlrg lawn
oaJnranr.vnping a�a .Doan
I I.kg.�n moasums cnnoaa � Pow
-.bnYmng �larso mmuma uin llpxr
npllg Fw'p�ttxp Dt I I or S years
-H,m^nng Nx,cn-,irdrr wQnn aY
�.a„ylr, nni rwhcx� ran Ii1tlYY :ellm
M.1-d helve
>u�
[� Itloul rr nsx�merl 9nll wra
— � rol,srs hm.IJelr 6YJ1itl(I[r'cF
_ rr�r��myam�mledannng
0 ion
m =Fwt
MARCH 3, 2023
INDOOR AR ASSESSMENT PROGRESS —
PARCEL IC - BAYRIOGE PARK
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
F'm mx Ferd Aeronwrmic Property,
Newport [leach, Celftmie
By. nrn lPfcjKl No.n Aqf lof
t1��] MLQ:0l&„2023 '9" 2
Construct: Fall 2023 — Spring 2024
Operate: —1 year
• 13 extraction wells within community
1 treatment system outside of
community walls
Explanation
Soil vapor extra ction piping
O Proposed :,oil vapor extracton well
Proposed treatment system building
ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS - Summary
Alternatives
involving parking
spaces —
Disruption to Proximity to
Impact on
Permitting
Implementation
Power Connection
Option
Description
Communications ,righborhoo, Homes
Parking
Complexity
Complexity
Complexity
Bayridge Park- 5 small
- Community Mailer 6/3/21, Public comme t
1
systems in parking spots
6/7-7/9/21, Public meeting 6/10/21 High Low
nfea Low
Medium Medium
(FS/RAP)
HOA did not approve use of parking spa( s.
Disruption of mature landscaping and
Bayridge Park -Landscaped
drainage
2
Areas between homes
High High
-Inaccessibility for construction equipment
Low
Medium Medium
Does not solve the proximity to homes
Proposed by City on 2/15/23
Bayridge Park - 2-3 Parking
- All parking areas within project limits are
3
spots in eastern half of
restricted by HOA MOU
High
tedium
I nfeasib
Low
Low
Low
r
community.
-Parking impacts are concern at every publ
meeting
Propose y City on 2 15 23
Bayridge Park - Larger
Northwest corner parking area less
impacted
4
treatment system across 3
-Significant increase in linear feet of
parking spots - northwest
trenching required and construction durat in
corner of neighborhood
-Voltage drop over additional distance not
code
5
ME
Bison Ave
- uiscussion wim l.lty about setoaCK
requirements deemed this infeasible
Bison construction moratorium
Northern proposed by City 12/21,
6
Along Country Club (norther
infeasible due to space limit and retaining
wall impact
Public meeting 11/4/21 and 1/18/23
Country Club Drive -
City LTP process resulted in comments from
7
adjacent to 94 Hartford
3 nearest residents with concerns about the
(Final FS/RAP & RDIP)
location.
Low Medium Low
Low Low
— 1 —
Low Medium Low Medium
Low I High I Low I Medium
High Infeasible
Hieh ^Aadii
Low
Low I Low
LOCATION ANALYSIS — Electrical Connection
• Southern California Edison performed site visits and plan checks
starting July 2022.
• Belcourt Drive is the only feasible 3-phase power connection.
• Bringing the power connection farther into Bayridge Park would
require upsizing conduits, doubling the width and depth of the trench.
• Existing utilities inhibit a wider trench.
Bison Ave
I I
Chesterileld � �. �' �1 •' I
{ I
Parcelld { f
Bayridge Park Homeowners Association wnodhLr ' sea6orauypl {
❑ c 1
F n
1
1
1`
it
5 �eest'u�y Lt
l m w
C
4
I
Parcel 11 1 i3elceurt Terrace Homeowners Association
1_��� j• f� Parcel 12
Belcourt Master Community Association
N
v G- sdale s r D � Cheshire Gl
m ` e ❑r
Con9 g�Y Dr 4 Lony gay Or i'n ~�� i
Parcel 13 uuAlrer yls
One Ford Road Community Association
Locations Considered
• Within Bayridge Park
• Along Bison Avenue
• Along Country Club Drive
Criteria Considered
• Disruption to neighborhood
• Construction duration
• Construction footprint within community walls
• Power connection complexity
• Distance from source
• Voltage drop
• Permitting complexity
• Setbacks from public right of way
• Moratorium on Bison
• Implementation complexity
• Slope stability
• Disruption of mature landscaping
• Accessibility for construction equipment
• Proximity to homes
• Proximity to windows, garages, vs walls
• Impact on parking
• Parking congestion worse in portions of the
community than others
"Building proximity intrinsically increases the risk for the Appellants."
The proximity of the treatment unit
regarding risk and has no bearing on
building is not the determining factor
Health & Safety.
It is the exhaust concentration of the SVE that determines risk and that will be
dictated by the Air District permit.
• The HOA is represented here tonight.
• This LTP is solely the responsibility of WSP and Ford. The HOA is
the landowner, but the permit will be managed by WSP.
• The HOA had significant input on the terms and conditions for
the use of the HOA's land. This is normal.
• The determining factors: engineering design, implementability
and power availability.
Current
• City of Newport Beach — Limited Term Permit
• Submitted August 2022
• Public comment began January 2023
• WSP responses to comments included in all staff reports since 3/2/23
• Planning Commission approved permit on 6/22/23
South Coast Air Quality Management District — Permit to Operate
• Draft permit issued November 2022 (7 months of supervisory review)
• Public comment period — 30 days
• City of Newport Beach — Building Permit
• Design submitted for plan check in December 2022
• Comments received February 2023
• Conditions of approval include obtaining Limited Term Permit and Permit to Operate
Construction start date is reliant on obtaining all permits listed above.
• Conducting extensive outreach since 2018
• Over 25 public meetings
• 10 fact sheets
• 6 Bayridge Park specific meetings —
3/4/2020, 4/22/21, 6/10/21, 11/4/211
1/18/23; 6/8/23
• Monthly email updates for Bayridge Park
residents
• Work notices distributed via US Mail one
week prior to work
• 24- to 48-hour phone notice when working
in front of homes
• Project website and toll -free hotline
• Community relations advocate during
construction and one-on-one briefings
with residents, as needed
• Safety
• Location Decision Making
• Timeframe of Remediation
• Quality of Life
• Noise
• Aesthetics
• Parking
• Proximity
"1 have done my research and believe that it can operate safely to address the risk my wife
and 1- and the other 21 homes - are currently experiencing in the community."
Enrique Sanchez, Bayridge Park Resident and HOA Board President
"Both the Water Board and WSP have done an excellent job communicating with us about the
issues and possible solutions. They have provided intelligent, transparent communications —
answering my questions and addressing my worries — whenever I've called."
Gwenn Abrams, Bayridge Park Resident
"If Ford and the Santa Ana Water Board are both saying that the SVE system can operate
safely in this location, then let's listen to the environmental experts and approve this limited
term permit so we can start to protect this community and get rid of the air purifiers."
Danielle Ocker-Rivas, Bayridge Park Resident
"For us and the number of young children living at Bayridge, we need the soil vapor extraction
(SVE) system installed so that all people of all ages can live here safely."
Jack and Teena Copeland, Bayridge Park Resident
Summary:
• The selected location is the only viable location.
• The system has a finite operation period and then the building will
be removed.
• SVE technology is safe, reliable, and is the most commonly used
method of soil vapor remediation.
Ford and WSP are open to discussion with any resident to try and
address specific concerns.
Please contact us at:
(833) 949-3673
info@ford N BFacts.com