Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGP_UPDATE_TRAFFIC_STUDY_ADOPTED_LAND_USE_SCENARIO111111111111.111111111111111111111111111111111111 *NEW FILE* GP - UP DAT E_T RAF F I C_ST U DY _ADPTED_LAN D_USE_SCENA I I I 1 t 1 41Corporate ParkSuite300 Irvine, CA92606 949.660.1994main 949.660.1911tax wwW.u1banxroaduOM October 5, 2006 Mr. Elwood Tescher EIP ASSOCIATES 12301 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 430 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Subject: City Council Adopted Land Use Scenario Dear Mr. Tescher: This letter has been prepared as a supplement to the City of Newport Beach General Plan Transportation Study (Urban Crossroads, Inc., March 21, 2006). Throughout this letter, the City of Newport Beach General Plan Transportation Study (Urban Crossroads, Inc., March 21, 2006) shall be referred to as the Transportation Study. The purpose of this letter is to evaluate the land use alternative adopted by the Newport Beach City Council from a transportation standpoint. To perform this evaluation, an additional model scenario has been prepared. This scenario includes the same roadway network as was analyzed in the Transportation Study to maintain consistency with the results of the Transportation Study and to provide analysis of a reasonable worst case scenario. In this letter, model inputs are discussed and refined forecast volumes are presented. Data are compared to Existing conditions, General Plan Buildout Without Project, and General Plan Buildout With Project conditions, as presented in the Transportation Study. Land Use and Socioeconomic Data (SED) This section discusses the land use and socioeconomic data inputs. Mr. Elwood Tescher ' EIP ASSOCIATES October 5, 2006 Page 2 Land Use The starting point for the With City Council Adopted Land Use Scenario was the General Plan Buildout With Project scenario from the Transportation Study. Table 1 summarizes the overall land uses included in the City Council Adopted Land Use scenario for the City of Newport Beach. There is an increase of over 1,000 dwelling ' units from the Without Project scenario, and an increase of over 10,000 dwelling units from Existing. Non-residential categories that grow by more than 100,000 square feet ' include general commercial and medical/government office. At the same time, the quantity of certain non-residential uses are projected to decrease (by approximately ' 150,000 square feet for auto dealer/sales, 2,300,000 square feet for general office, and 800,000 square feet for industrial use). The increase in general commercial (retail) land use and decrease in general office use is partially attributable to a different approach to allocating these uses in the model for the Without Project and City Council Adopted scenarios. Socio-Economic Data Soc►o-economic data (SED) for the City Council Adopted Land Use scenario that has been calculated from land use is summarized in Table 2. Table 2 also contains a comparison of City Council Adopted Land Use SED to General Plan Buildout Without Project and to Existing SED for the City of Newport Beach. The total number of dwelling units is projected to increase by 1,245 units (3%) from Without Project conditions and to increase by 10,063 units from Existing conditions. For total employment, a decrease of 7,309 employees (8%) from Without Project conditions (which is an increase of 12,983 employees from Existing conditions) is anticipated. Trip Generation Table 3 summarizes the overall trip generation for the analysis scenarios. The overall trip generation for the City of Newport Beach With City Council Adopted Land Use scenario is an estimated 935,244 daily vehicle trips (resulting in a reduction from Mr. Elwood Tescher ' EIP ASSOCIATES October 5, 2006 Page 3 1 1 I II I I I Without Project trip generation of approximately 30,000 daily trips), which is 131,251 more than the existing (2005) 803,993 daily vehicle trips. Traffic Assignment The roadway system for the City Council Adopted Land Use scenario described in this letter has the same connectivity (new crossing of the Santa Ana River at 19th Street, no extension of the SR-55 freeway) as the roadway system presented for the General Plan Buildout With Project scenario of the Transportation Study. Slight modifications to the number of through lanes have been made to better represent General Plan Buildout conditions (in the vicinity of Dover Drive and Coast Highway, and on 32nd Street). Exhibit A shows the study area through lanes. Exhibit B summarizes the NBTM 3.1 refined City Council Adopted Land Use scenario daily traffic volumes throughout the City of Newport Beach. Volumes as compared to the Existing count, General Plan Buildout Without Project, and General Plan Buildout With Project forecasts are shown on Table 4. Only Irvine Avenue experiences an increase of more than 1,000 vehicles per day (VPD) when compared with General Plan Buildout Without Project conditions. Decreases of 3,000 VPD or more occur on Coast Highway from Tustin Avenue to Dover Drive, Dover Drive from 16th Street to Coast Highway, MacArthur Boulevard north of Bison Avenue, and the SR-55 Freeway from 22nd Street to 19th Street. Daily Capacity Analysis Daily roadway segment capacity analysis has been performed at study area roadways, and is shown on Exhibit C. The following roadway segments are expected to operate with daily V/C ratios greater than 0.90: • Newport Boulevard north of Via Lido • Jamboree Road north of Campus Drive Mr. Elwood Tescher EIP ASSOCIATES October 5, 2006 Page 4 • Jamboree Road north of Birch Street • Irvine Avenue north of University Drive • Irvine Avenue north of Santiago Drive • Irvine Avenue north of Highland drive • Irvine Avenue north of Dover Drive • Dover Drive north of Westcliff Drive • Jamboree Road north of Bayview Way • Jamboree Road north of University Drive • Jamboree Road north of San Joaquin Hills Road • MacArthur Boulevard north of Bison Avenue • MacArthur Boulevard north of Ford Road • MacArthur Boulevard north of San Joaquin Hills Road • Newport Coast Drive north of SR-73 Northbound Ramps • Newport Coast Drive north of San Joaquin Hills Road • Newport Boulevard south of Hospital Road • Jamboree Road south of Birch Street • Irvine Avenue south of University Drive • Campus Drive east of MacArthur Boulevard • Bristol Street North east of Birch Street • Bristol Street South east of Birch Street • Coast Highway east of Dover Drive • Coast Highway east of Bayside Drive • Coast Highway east of Jamboree Road • Coast Highway east of MacArthur Boulevard • Coast Highway east of Goldenrod Avenue • Coast Highway east of Marguerite Avenue • Coast Highway east of Poppy Avenue • Coast Highway east of Newport Coast Drive Mr. Elwood Tescher EIPASSOCIATES October 5, 2006 Page 5 II • Coast Highway west of Superior Avenue / Balboa Boulevard • Coast Highway west of Riverside Drive • Bristol Street North west of Campus Drive • Bristol Street South west of Campus Drive • Dover Drive west of Irvine Avenue • Bristol Street South west of Jamboree Road The daily capacity of a roadway correlates to a number of widely varying factors, including traffic peaking characteristics, traffic turning volumes, and the volume of traffic on crossing streets. The daily capacities are therefore most appropriately used for long range General Plan analysis, or as a screening tool to determine the need for more detailed peak hour analysis. More detailed peak hour analysis has been conducted at key intersections in the vicinity of all these roadway segments to quantify actual peak hour operations and levels of service. Peak Hour Forecasts The final and most meaningful data evaluated for the City Council Adopted Land Use scenario was intersection volume and geometric data for the 65 intersections selected for analysis (including Newport Boulevard Southbound Ramps at Coast Highway). The existing intersection configurations have been used for calculation of the initial City Council Adopted Land Use scenario intersection capacity utilization values (ICUs). Table 5 summarizes the City Council Adopted Land Use ICUs based on the AM and PM ' peak hour intersection turning movement volumes and the existing intersection II geometric data compared with Existing (2002), General Plan Buildout Without Project, and General Plan Buildout With Project ICUs. Attachment A contains the detailed ICU calculation worksheets for City Council Adopted Land Use conditions. The worksheets in Attachment A summarize the intersection geometric data and the AM and PM peak intersection turning movement volumes. I! Fj 1 Mr. Elwood Tescher EIP ASSOCIATES October 5, 2006 Page 6 Intersections with ICU values greater than 0.90 (LOS "E" or worse) in either peak period for City Council Adopted Land Use conditions without improvements beyond 2005 conditions are: • Riverside Drive (NS) / Coast Highway (EW) (AM/PM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS) / Campus Drive (EW) (PM) • Von Karman Avenue (NS) / Campus Drive (EW) (PM) • Jamboree Road (NS) / Campus Drive (EW) (AM/PM) • Jamboree Road (NS) / Birch Street (EW) (AM) • Campus Drive (NS) / Bristol Street North (EW) (AM/PM) • Irvine Avenue (NS) / Mesa Drive (EW) (AM/PM) • Irvine Avenue (NS) / University Drive (EW) (AM/PM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS) / Jamboree Road (EW) (AM/PM) • Jamboree Road (NS) / Bristol Street South (EW) (AM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS) / Ford Road / Bonita Canyon Drive (EW) (PM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS) / San Joaquin Hills Road (EW) (PM) • SR-73 Northbound Ramps (NS) / Bonita Canyon Drive (EW) (AM) • Goldenrod Avenue (NS) / Coast Highway (EW) (AM) • Marguerite Avenue (NS) / Coast Highway (EW) (AM/PM) Intersection analysis has been performed with the improvements adopted in the City of Newport Beach General Plan (July 25, 2006). ICU worksheets are included in Attachment B. Table 6 also compares the ICU results with and without improvements. After improvement, the following intersections will operate at LOS "E": • Goldenrod Avenue (NS) / Coast Highway (EW) (AM) • Marguerite Avenue (NS) / Coast Highway (EW) (AM/PM) Mr. Elwood Tescher EIP ASSOCIATES ' October 5, 2006 Page 7 Freeway / Tollwav and Ramp Analysis For the City Council Adopted Land Use scenario, the volumes on most segments have ' slightly decreased when compared to the General Plan Buildout Without Project scenario. The analysis summary is shown on Table 7. With anticipated regional ' improvements, the following segments operate at a deficient level of service in the City Council Adopted Land Use scenario: ' SR-73 Northbound ' • 1-405 Freeway to Bear Street (AM) Bear Street to SR-55 Freeway (AM) • SR-55 Freeway to Jamboree Road (AM) • Bonita Canyon Drive to Newport Coast Drive (AM) • Newport Coast Drive to Toll Plaza (AM) ' SR-73 Southbound ' • 1-405 Freeway to Bear Street (PM) Bear Street to SR-55 Freeway (PM) ' • SR-55 Freeway to Jamboree Road (PM) I II II Because the needed improvements to serve City Council Adopted Land Use scenario traffic volumes on the freeway exceed the planned system improvements, a potentially significant impact to the freeway system may occur. The ramp volumes for the City Council Adopted Land Use scenario are similar to the ramp volumes for the General Plan Buildout With Project scenario, which resulted in the same operational deficiencies. Table 8 summarizes the analysis. The deficient ramps are: • Bristol Street Northbound Off • Jamboree Road Southbound On Mr. Elwood Tescher EIP ASSOCIATES ' October 5, 2006 Page 8 1 LJ MacArthur Boulevard Northbound On • MacArthur Boulevard Southbound Off • Bonita Canyon Drive Northbound On • Newport Coast Drive Northbound Off • Newport Coast Drive Northbound On • Newport Coast Drive Southbound Off Because the needed improvements to serve City Council Adopted Land Use scenario traffic volumes on the freeway exceed the planned system improvements, a potentially significant impact to the freeway system may occur. ' Sincerely, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. arlie Whiteman P.E. Associate CW:MW:cg JN:01232-41 Car ton Waters, P.E. Principal xc: Ms. Patricia Temple, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Mr. Richard Edmonston, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Ms. Sharon Wood, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Attachments II LT.] 4D / EXHIBIT A NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT THROUGH LANES 4U1� a hlD % <D 6D LEGEND: 4 = NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES D =DIVIDED U = UNDIVIDED ik 6D <"°�n A< eu a �� PACIFIC 4u 4D OCEAN 0 NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY, Newport Beach, Califomia - 01232: 32 (rev. 12/19/05) URBAN O 41 17 EXHIBIT B CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE SCENARIO II 4341 5925 y AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) 39 r4l 21 3 17 8 j / 41 41 /.. 10 10 3 2 40 \ y 33 .l \ 5 ` t 3 31 xaxuwoa \ �� 4 2 l 25 32 i 10 f� 29 % f' wmtam � i .T 19 15 15 22 } 6 62 136 3 26 70 10 N 17 70 9 30 5 e 13 @ " 5 � t 19 05 61 14 e GR7 40 25 1, , M. �m�ar 30 \V4 13 14 o '§ \ 5 1 lu 11 \ / 28 14 4 \4 I \� 53 f 6 \ 19 55 9 7 1 \ 41 \ 47 21 4 21 9 19 i" LEGEND: 34 =VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S) i 4 PACIFIC �`,• OCEAN 49 _ EXHIBIT C CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE SCENARIO °w1Q59 ^ ,_ �4 VOLUME / CAPACITY (V/C) RATIOS 085 6�N 1.33 1.14 ,n 7, 1.29 0 86 1 24 L� 0.09; 075 i 0.50 a i f62 l 1.21 29 023 .18 f l I \ � 250 10.94 100 F 0.85 p H w T"F 056 0.44° 0.18 0 0.26� 0 30 \ i 29 \ 033 0\Y��0 33 g 0.7 091 I A9 0.38 047 049 0.62 LEGEND: 0.88 a VOLUME / CAPACITY Y 0.96 _ TABLE 1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN PROJECT LAND USE SUMMARY BUILDOUT BUILDOUT CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL WITHOUT WITH ADOPTED CHANGE FROM NBTM EXISTING PROJECT PROJECT LAND USE WITHOUT % DESCRIPTION UNITS 3 QUANTITY3 QUANTITY' QUANTITY' QUANTITY3 PROJECT CHANGE CODE' 19,570 20,402 20,023 453 594 2.42% 5.41% 1RAent Density Residential DU 18,702 2Density Residential DU 10,974 15,077 14,223 19,114 15,670 15,077 650 6.70% 3 DU 9,703 14,427 200 200 320 120 60.00% 4dential DU200' DU 600 455 455 455 0.00% 5e LLING UNITS DU 40,179 49,729 54,394 51,545 1,817 4.52% ROOM 134 139 136 6,413 139 5,642 105 0.00% 3.25% Hotel Re Tonal Commercial ROOM TSF 3,231 -1,331,000 5,537 1,559.000 1,684.000 1,619,525 60.525 4.55% GeneralCommerciai TSF -3,823.398 5,120.942 5,268.840 5,285.609 164.667 4.31% 0.00% NMotel Commercial/Recreation ACRE _ 5.100 99.450 5.100 198.660 5.100 198.860 5.100 158.910 • � 39.950 40.17% Restaurant Fast Food Restaurant TSF TSF - - 15.640 15.640 15.640 13.940 1.700 -10.87% 16 Auto Dealer/Sales TSF -- 201.300 386.050 386.050 244.650 141.400 "•11 70.24% 0.00% 17 Yacht Club TSF 51.830 70.310 70.310 70.310 93,050 - 31.720 189.15% 18 Health Club 770 61.330 61.330 3 5.00% 19 Tennis Club CRT 60 1,055 59 1,055 59 1,055 62 1,055 0.00% 20 21 Madna Theater SLIP SEAT 5,489 5,475 5,475 5,565 64.00 90 :. - 1.64% 0.00%'i 22 Newport Dunes ACRE TSF 64.00 11, 657.109 64.00 13,492.354 64.00 11,209.939 11,187.205 - (2,305.149 -19.77% 23 24 General Office Medical/Government Office TSF 959.718 1,084.576 1,657.561 1,505.101 420.525 - 43.82% 0.00% 25 Research & Development TSF 81.730 81.730 81.730 81.730 (808.643) -62.63% 26 Industrial TSF 1,2 11.079 1,956.092 885.310 1,147.449 0.00% 27 Mini -Story e/Warehouse TSF 196.420 196.420 196.420 196.420 0.00% 28 Pre-school/Da Care TSF 48.050 49.000 40.600 49.000 0.00% 29 Elements /Private School STU 4,999 5,055 5,555 5,055 0.00% 30 Junior/Hi h School STU 5,215 5,215 5,215 5,215 5.208 14.00% 31 Cultural/Learnln Center TSF 35.000 40.000 40.000 45.208 D.00% 32 Libre TSF 78.800 84.600 84.600 84.600 9.900 -18.44% 33 Post Office TSF 53.700 73.700 73.700 63.800 0.00% 34 Hos ital BED 1.031 2,001 2,001 2,001 498 75.34% 35 Nursin /Conv. Home BEDS 661 566 566 68 29.850 -7.90% 36 Church TSF 377.780 511.704 465.904 481.854 10.900 7.29% 37 Youth Ctr./Service TSF 149.540 183.209 189,209 172.309 0.170 0.13°/s 38 Park ACRE 128.360 127.780 183.680 127.610 45.910 N/A 39 Re lonal Park ACRE 45.91011 65.910 0.040 0.01% 40 Golf Course ACRE 305.330 298.290 I 298.290 298.330 ' Uses 8, 12, and 14 are part of the old NBTAM model strucluri the City land use datasels. 3 Units Abbreviations: DU = Dwelling Units TSF = Thousand Square Feet CRT = Court STU = Students 3Includes Newport Coast and recent annexation areas. UAUcJobs\ 01100-015001_012001012321Exce11101232-41.xlsT r I 1 1 I TABLE 2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN PROJECT LAND USE BASED SOCIOECONOMIC DATA SUMMARY VARIABLE EXISTING QUANTITY' BUILDOUT WITHOUT PROJECT QUANTITY' BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT QUANTITY' CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE QUANTITY' COUNCIL CHANGE FROM WITHOUT PROJECT % CHANGE Occupied SingIe Family DwellIng Units 17,4671 18,324 19,1051 18,732 408 2% occupied Multi -Family Dwelling Units 20,136 28,097 31,793 28,934 837 3% TOTAL OCCUPIED DWELLING UNITS 37,603 46A21 50,898 47,666 1,246 3% Group Quarters Population 1 6611 5661 566 68 -498 -88% Population 83,0071 100.625 108.421 102,929 2,304 2% Employed Residents 49,632 60,919 66,581 62,358 1,439 2% Retall Employees 11,525 15,108 15,480 14,935 -173 -1% Service Employees 1 19,6811 25,887 27,336 25,767 -120 0% Other Em to ees 1 41,468 51,971 45,312 44,955 -7,016 -13% TOTAL EMPLOYEES 72,6741 92,966 88,128 85,657 -7,309 .8% Elem/Hf h School Students 10,2141 10,2701 10,7701 10,270 01 0% ' I Includes Newport Coast and recent annex U.,WcJobsl 01100-015001_012001012321En 1 I 1 TABLE 3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY SCENARIO TRIP GENERATION EXISTING 2002 761,22 EXISTING 2005 803,99 BUILDOUT WITHOUT PROJECT 966,711 BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT 996,10 CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE 935,2 44 CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE CHANGE FROM WITHOUT PROJECT (30,467 PERCENT CHANGE (CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED TO WITHOUT PROJECT) U:1UcJobs\ 01100-01500\ 01200\01232\Excell[01232-41.ASIT-3 M M M M M M M M M= M M M to TABLE 4 (1 of 5) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON LOCATION EXISTING (2001/2002) COUNT WITHOUT PROJECT FORECAST BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE CITY COUNCIL CHANGE FROM WITHOUT PROJECT % CHANGE 15th St. (Coast Hwy. to Bluff Rd.) 0 9,000 8,000 7,000 -2,000 -22.2% 16th St. (Irvine Ave, to Dover Dr.) 5,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 0 0.0% 32nd St. (west of Newport Blvd.) 8,000 9,000 8,000 9,000 0 0.0% 32nd St. (east of Newport Blvd.) 3,000 5,000 4,000 4,000 -1,000 -20.0% Avocado Ave. (north of San Miguel Dr.) 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0.0% Avocado Ave. (south of San Miguel Dr.) 12,000 11,000 11,000 12,000 1,000 9.1% Avocado Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 11,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% Balboa Blvd. (south of Coast Ilwy.) 18,000 22,000 22,000 21,000 -1,000 4.5% Bayside Dr. (south of Coast Hwy.) 10,000 12,000 12,000 13,000 1,000 8.3% Birch St. (Jamboree Rd. to Von Karman Ave.) 12,000 19,000 20,000 20,000 1,000 5.3% Birch St. (Von Karman Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 15,000 21,000 22,000 21,000 0 0.0% Birch St. (west of MacArthur Blvd.) 16,000 21,000 24,000 21,000 0 0.0% Birch St. (north of Bristol St. North) 23,000 29,000 30,000 29,000 0 0.0% Birch St. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 19,000 22,000 23,000 22,000 0 0.0% Birch St. (south of Bristol St. South) 15,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 0 0.0% Bison Ave. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 13,000 17,000 18,000 17,000 0 0.0%' BisonAve. (MacArthur Blvd. to SR-73 Fwy.) 7,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% Bluff Rd. (Coast Hwy. to 15th St.) 0 8,000 7,000 6,000 -2,000 -25.0% Bluff Rd. (15th St. to 17th St.) 0 9,000 6,000 5,000 -4,000 -44.4% Bonita Canyon Dr. (east of MacArthur Blvd.) 26,000 32,000 31,000 30,000 -2,000 -6.3% Bonita Canyon Dr. (west of SR-73 Fwy.) 17,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. North (west of Campus Dr.) 28,000 34,000 35,000 34,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. North (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 23,000 29,000 30,000 29,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. North (east of Birch St.) 22,000 29,000 30,000 29,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. North (west of Jamboree Rd.) 16,000 19,000 20,000 19,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. South (west of Campus Dr./Irvine Ave.) 28,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. South (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 17,000 22,000 23,000 22,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. South (east of Birch St.) 16,000 22,000 22,000 21,000 -1,000 -4.5% Bristol St. South (west of Jamboree Rd.) 31,000 38,000 39,000 37,000 -1,000 -2.6% R M = M M M M = = M M TABLE 4 (2 of 5) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON M M M M M LOCATION EXISTING (2001/2002) COUNT WITHOUT PROJECT FORECAST BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE CITY COUNCIL CHANGE FROM WITHOUT PROJECT %CHANGE Campus Dr. (Jamboree Rd. to Von Kammn Ave.) 16,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 0 0.0% Campus Dr. (Von Karman Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 20,000 35,000 34,000 34,000 -1,000 -2.90/( Campus Dr. (west of MacArthur Blvd.) 26,000 39,000 40,000 39,000 0 0.00/( Campus Dr. (north of Bristol St. North) 28,000 39,000 40,000 39,000 0 0.0% Campus Dr. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 30,000 41,000 41,000 41,000 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. (west of 15th St.) 46,000 45,000 46,000 44,000 -1,000 -2.2% Coast Hwy. (Superior Ave. to Newport Blvd.) 28,000 40,000 41,000 39,000 -1,000 -2.5% Coast Hwy. (Newport Blvd. to Riverside Ave.) 53,000 64,000 67,000 65,000 1,000 1.60/c Coast Hwy. (Riverside Ave. to Tustin Ave.) 45,000 56,000 58,000 55,000 -1,000 -1.8% Coast Hwy. (Tustin Ave. to Dover Dr.) 42,000 51,000 53,000 47,000 -4,000 -7.80/c Coast Hwy. (Dover Dr. to Bayside Dr.) 63,000 74,000 76,000 74,000 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. (Bayside Dr. to Jamboree Rd.) 51,000 62,000 63,000 62,000 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. (Jamboree Rd. to Newport Center Dr.) 42,000 49,000 50,000 50,000 1,000 2.0% Coast Hwy. (Newport Center Dr, to Avocado Ave.) 35,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. (Avocado Ave, to MacArthur Blvd.) 36,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. (MacArthur Blvd. to Goldenrod Ave.) 40,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. (Goldenrod Ave. to Marguerite Ave.) 39,000 43,000 43,000 42,000 -1,000 -2.3% Coast Hwy. (Marguerite Ave_ to Poppy Ave.) 35,000 42,000 42,000 41,000 -1,000 -2.4% Coast Hwy. (Poppy Ave. to Newport Coast Dr.) 28,000 38,000 38,000 37,000 -1,000 -2.6% Coast Hwy (east of Newport Coast Dr.) 35,000 49,000 49,000 49,000 0 0.0% Dover Dr. (Irvine Ave, to WestcliffDr.) 9,000 11,000 11,000 10,000 -1,000 -9.1% Dover Dr. (WestcliffDr. to 16th St.) 22,000 24,000 24,000 22,000 -2,000 -8.3% Dover Dr. (16th St. to Cliff Dr.) 25,000 28,000 28,000 25,000 -3,000 -10.7% Dover Dr. (Cliff Dr. to Coast Hwy.) 29,000 33,000 33,000 30,000 -3,000 -9.101C Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at University Dr.) 10,000 11,000 10,000 10,000 -1,000 -9.10C Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at Ford Rd.) 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 0 0.00/( Ford Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 9,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 0 0.00/( Goldenrod Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 4,000 4,000 3,000 -1,000 -25.00/c Highland Dr. east of Irvine Ave.) 2,0001 2,0001 2,0001 2,000 0 0.0% M M m m m TABLE 4 (3 of 5) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON 11LDOUT WITH ROJECT CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE CITY COUNCIL CHANGE FROM WITHOUT PROJECT % CHANGE 17,000 14,000 -1,000 -6.7% 11,000 8,000 -1,000 -11.1% 38,000 38,000 0 0.0% 42,000 41,000 0 0.0% 40,000 40,000 0 0.0% 33,000 33,000 0 0.0% 32,000 31,000 -1,000 -3.1% 33,000 32,000 0 0.0% 29,000 29,000 0 0.0% 13,000 15,000 3,000 25.0% 48,000 47,000 0 0.0% 56,000 55,000 0 0.0% 47,000 44,000 0 0.0% 53,000 51,000 0 0.0%' 53,000 52,000 0 0.0% 52,000 51,000 -1,000 -1.9% 43,000 42,000 0 0.0% 47,000 46,000 0 0.0% 57,000 55,000 0 0.0% 45,000 43,000 -1,000 -2.3% 42,000 41,000 -1,000 -2A% 15,000 15,000 0 0.0% 37,000 35,000 1,000 2.9/0 28,000 27,000 0 0.0% 34,000 33,000 0 0.0% 38,000 36,000 0 0.0% 73,000 70,000 -3,000 -4.1% 70,000 70,010 0 0.0% 61,000 61,000 1,000 1.7% M M= M= M M 8 TABLE 4 (4 of 5) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON LOCATION EXISTING (2001I2002) COUNT WITHOUT PROJECT FORECAST BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT CITY I COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE CITY COUNCIL CHANGE FROM WITHOUT PROJECT %CHANGE MacArthur Blvd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to San Miguel Rd.) 35,000 37,000 37,000 37,000 0 0.0% MacArthur Blvd. (San Miguel Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 31,000 36,000 36,000 35,000 -1,000 -2.8% Marguerite Ave. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 7,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 0 0.0% Marguerite Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 6,000 9,000 8,000 9,000 0 0.0% Mesa Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 12,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 0 0.0% ewport Blvd. (north of Hospital Rd.) 36,000 43,000 45,000 44,000 1,000 2.30/c Newport Blvd. (Hospital Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 43,000 52,000 54,000 53,000 1,000 1.90/C ewport Blvd. (Coast Hwy. to Via Lido) 48,000 57,000 58,000 55,000 -2,000 -3.5% Newport Blvd. (Via Lido to 32nd St.) 36,000 40,000 42,000 41,000 1,000 2.5% Newport Blvd. (south of 32nd St.) 29,000 33,000 35,000 34.000 1,000 3.0% Newport Center Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 14,000 16,000 17,000 16,000 0 0.0% Newport Coast Dr. (SR 73 Fwy. to San Joaquin Bills Rd.) 17,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 0 0.0% Newport Coast Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 15,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 0 0.0% Newport Coast Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 12,000 27,000 28,000 28,000 1,000 3.7% Placentia Ave. (north of Superior Ave.) 12,000 12,000 12,000 10,000 -2,000 -16.7% Placentia Ave. (Superior Ave. to Hospital Rd.) 7,000 11,000 11,000 9,000 -2,000 -18.2% Poppy Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0.0% Riverside Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 9,000 10,000 11,000 10,000 0 0.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to Santa Cruz Rd.) 16,000 17,000 18,000 18,000 1,000 5.9% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Cruz Rd. to Santa Rosa Rd.) 11,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 0 0.0%' San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Rosa Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 21,000 26,000 27,000 27,000 1,000 3.8% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (MacArthur Blvd. to San Miguel Rd.) 19,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 0 0.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (San Miguel Rd. to Marguerite Ave.) 18,000 25,000 24,000 25,000 0 0.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Marguerite Ave. to Spyglass Hill Rd.) 12,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 0 0.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Spyglass Hill Rd. to Newport Coast Dr.) 12,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 0 0.0% San Miguel Dr. (north of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 7,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 0 0.0% San Miguel Dr. (south of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 7,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 0 0.0% San Miguel Dr. (north of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 12,000 14,000 .. 14,000 14,000 0 0.0% San NM uel Dr. San Joa uin Hills Rd. to MacArthur Blvd. 12,000 15,000 16,000 16,000 1,000 6.7% � � r � �■ r � � � � r r r TABLE 4 (5 of 5) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON co M M r r M M LOCATION EXISTING (200112002) COUNT WITHOUT PROJECT FORECAST BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE CITY COUNCIL CHANGE FROM WITHOUT PROJECT %CHANGE San Miguel Dr. (MacArthur Blvd. to Avocado Ave.) 19,000 20,000 20,000 21,000 1,000 5.0% San Miguel Dr. (west of Avocado Ave.) 10,000 11,000 12,000 12,000 1,000 9.1% Santa Barbara Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 10,000 11,000 13,000 12,000 1,000 9.1% Santa Cruz Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 8,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 0 0.0% Santa Rosa Dr. (south of San Joaquin Bills Rd.) 11,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 0 0.0% Santiago Dr. (Tustin Ave. to Irvine Ave.) 5,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 0 0.0% Santiago Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 3,000 3,000 4,000 3,000 0 0.0% Spyglass Hill Rd. (San Miguel Dr. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 4,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0.0% SR 55 Freeway (north of SR-73 Fwy.) 155,000 188,000 189,000 188,000 0 0.0% SR 55 Freeway (22nd St. to 19th St.) 94,000 125,000 125,000 122,000 -3,000 -2A% SR-73 Freeway (SR-55 Fwy. to Campus Dr.) 94,000 135,000 136,000 134,000 -1,000 -0.7% SR-73 Freeway (Jamboree Rd. to University Dr.) 59,000 97,000 98,000 96,000 -1,000 -1.0% SR 73 Freeway (Bonita Canyon Rd. to Newport Coast Dr.) 62,000 136,000 136,000 136,000 0 0.0% SR-73 Freeway (east of Newport Coast Dr.) 56,000 127,000 128,000 127,000 0 0.0%' SuperiorAve. (north ofPlacentia Ave.) 17,000 20,000 21,000 19,000 -1,000 -5.0% Superior Ave. (Placentia Ave. to Hospital Rd.) 22,000 18,000 18,000 17,000 -1,000 -5.6% Superior Ave. (Hospital Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 24,000 20,000 22,000 19,000 -1,000 -5.0% Tustin Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0.0% University Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0.0% University Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 11,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 0 0.0% Via Lido (east ofNewport Blvd.) 8,000 10,000 10,000 9,000 -1,000 -10.0% Von Karman Ave. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 14,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 0 0.0% Von Karman Ave. (Birch St. to MacArthur Blvd.) 12,000 16,000 17,000 17,000 1,000 6.3% Westcliff Dr. Irvine Ave. to Dover Dr. 16,000 16,000 16,000 14,000 -2,000 -12.5% ARTERIAL TOTAL 2,957,000 3,647,000 3,715,000 3,611,000 -36,000 -1.0% FREEWAY TOTAL 520,000 1 808,000 812,000 803,000 -5,000 -0.6% OVERALL TOTAL 3,477,000 4,455,000 4,527-000 4,414,000 -41,000 -0.9% U:1UcJobs\_01100-01500\ 01200101232\Excell[01232-41.)ds]T-4 M M M M M M M M M M M s M M M M M M M b.15th St. & Coast Hw. 2. SUneriorAV. & Place 4. Newoort BI. & 6. Newport BI. & 32nd St. 7. Riverside Av. & Coast I 0 8. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw St. 1. Von Kerman Av. & Jamboree Rd. & Campus Dr. Jamboree Rd. & Birch St. Birch St & Bristol St (N) Campus Dr.Arvine Av. & Bristol St. Birch St & Bristol St. (Sl Irvine Av. & University Dr. Irvine Av. & Highland Dr. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. TABLE 5 (1 of 3) EXISTING WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING COUNT BUILDOUT WITHOUT PROJECT BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE -CITYI COUNCIL CHANGE FROM WITHOUT PROJECT EXISTING COUNT BUILDOUT WITHOUT PROJECT BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE COUNCIL CHANGE FROM WITHOUT PROJECT DNE' 0.65 0.63 0.65 0.00 DNE 0.84 0.82 0.83 -0.01 DNE' 0.74 0.72 0.65 -0.09 DNE 0.89 0.83 0.81 -0.08 0.66 0.65 0.67 0.58 -0.07 0.67 0.55 0.57 0.48 -0.07 0.84 0.89 0.88 _ 0.86 -0.03 0.90 0.75 0.76 0.75 0.00 0.54 0.75 0.83 0.76 0.01 0.70 0.91 0.96 0.85 -0.06 0Al 0.55 0.58 0.54 -0.02 0.37 0.40 0.41 0.37 -0.03 0.73 0.82 0.86 0.58 -0.24 0.78 0.88 0.91 0.67 -0.21 0.84 0.98 0.97 0.95 -0.03 0.93 0.92 0.93 0.91 -0.01 0.80 0.91 0.94 0.88 -0.03 0.67 0.76 0.83 0.77 0.01 0.61 0.76 0.81 0.77 0.01 0.85 1.21 1.24 1.20 -0,01 0.49 0.79 0.79 0.77 0.02 0.66 0.90 0.90 0.84 0.06 0.55 0.70 0.73 0.72 0.02 0.79 0.93 0.97 0.94 0.01 0.46 0.58 0.54 0.581 0.00 063 0.66 0.65 0.65 -0.01 0.70 0.91 0.93 0.911 0.00 0.85 1.18 1.18 1.17 -0.01 0.61 1.00 1.00 1.001 0.00 0.60 0.84 0.84 0.85 0.01 0.77 0.99 1.02 1.001 0.01 0.94 1.07 1.06 1.07 0.00 0.66 0.94 0.90 088 -0.06 061 0.74 0.72 0.72 -0.02 0.72 0.91 0.89 0.90 -0.01 0.58 0.751 0.78 0.78 0.03 0.46 0.52 0.51 0.50 -0.02 0.44 0.521 0.54 0.52 0.00 0.70 0.991 0.98 1.04 0.05 0.94 1.19 1.19 1.27 0.08 0.82 1.17 1.19 1.18 0.01 0.89 1.08 1.09 1.08 0.00 0.66 0.68 0.69 0.69 0.01 0.72 0.76 0.77 0.77 0.01 0.57 0.60 0.60 0.62 0.02 0.60 0.65 0.65 0.64 -0.01 0.72 0.77 0.781 0.78 001 0.64 0.68 0.69 0.72 0.04 0.57 0.64 0.661 0.63 -0.01 0.77 0.80 0.82 0.78 402 N TABLE 5 (2 of 3) EXISTING WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON INTERSECTION NS & EW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING COUNT BUILDOUT WITHOUT PROJECT BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE CITY COUNCIL CHANGE FROM WITHOUT PROJECT EXISTING COUNT BUILDOUT WITHOUT PROJECT BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE CITY COUNCIL CHANGE FROM WITHOUT PROJECT 25. Dover Dr. & Westcliff Dr. 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.36 -0.02 0.48 0.53 0.54 0.54 0.01 26. Dover Dr. & 16th St. 0.55 0.60 0.60 0.54 -0.06 0.57 0.60 0.60 0.56 -0.04 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.70 0.80 0.81 0.78 -0.02 0.74 0.93 0.94 0.90 -0.03 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.69 0.88 0.89 0.90 0.02 0.70 0.85 0.85 0.86 0.01 29. MacArthur BI. & Jamboree Rd. _ 0.88 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.00 0.91 0.98 1.02 0.99 0.01 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. N 0.55 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.59 0.65 0.67 0.67 0.02 1. Bayvlew PI. & Bristol St S 0.48 0.60 0.60 0.58 -0.02 0.56 0.62 0.63 0.61 -0.01 2. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St S) 0.75 0.96 0.94 0:93 -0.03 0.72 0.85 0.87 0.85 0.00 3. Jamboree Rd. & Bayview Wy. 0.41 0.46 0.45 0.47 0.01 0.57 0.67 0.67 0.69 0.02 34. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr. lUniversity Dr. 0.60 0.68 0.6B 0.68 0.00 0.64 0.66 0.67 0.65 -0.01 35. Jamboree Rd. & Bison Av. 0.45 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.51 0.62 0.62 0.60 -0.02 36. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff DrJFord Rd. 0.69 0.80 0.80 0.78 -0.02 0.65 0.76 0.77 0.76 0.00 37. Jamboree Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.80 0.60 0.61 0.60 0.00 1.001 0.71 0.721 0.71 0.00 38. Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbara Dr. 0.47 0.54 0.58 0.56 _ 0.02 0.63 0.76 0.79 0.76 0.00 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.68 0.77 0.77 0.76 -0.01 0.74 078 0.80 0.78 0.00 0. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.36 0.36 0.38 0.37 0.01 0.36 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.01 1. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.32 0.39 0.41 0.40 0.01 0.52 0.69 0.71 0.70 0.01 2. Newport Center Dr. & Coast Hw. OAO OA7 0.48 OA71 0.00 0.52 0.62 0.63 0.63 0.01 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.33 0.35 0.36 0.38 0.03 0.72 0.79 0.79 0.80 0.01 5. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.58 0.73 0.73 0.72 -0.01 0.66 0.79 0.78 0.77 -0.02 6. SR-73 NB Rams & Bison Av. 0.31 0.51 0.52 0.52 0.01 0.37 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.00 7. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.26 0.42 OA2 0.43 0.01 0.17 0.32 0.32 0.33 0.01 8. MacArthur Bl. & Bison Av. 0.63 0.77 0.78 0.74 -0.03 0.60 0.79 0.79 0.77 -0.02 9. MacArthur BI. & Ford Rd.lBonita Canyon Dr. 0.71 0.791 0,801 0.78 -0.01 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.98 -0.0 50. MacArthur BI. & San Joa uin Hills Rd. 0.641 0.781 0.791 0.791 0.01 0.93 1.111 1.12 1.11 0.00 N N IN 51. Mack 52. MacAr 3. SR-73 54. SR-73 55. Sp gle 56. San M 57. Goldei 8. Margu 59.Mar ur 60. Spygle 61. Popp 62. Newp 64. Newpi 65. Ne i U:1UcJobs J TABLE 6 (Page 1 of 3) INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY FOR CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- LEVEL OF TRAFFIC BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND ICU SERVICE L T R L T R L T R L T R I AM I PM I AM I PM INTERSECTION CONTROL Bluff Rd. (NS) at: Coast Hw. (EW) -improvements TS 0 0 0 2 0 2> 2 3 0 0 3 1 0.65 0.83 B D 15th St. (NS) at: • Coast Hw. (EW) -Improvements TS 0 0 0 2 0 2> 2 3 0 0 3 1 0.65 0.81 B D Superior Av. (NS) at: • Placentia Av. (EW) TS 1 2 1 1 2 d 1 1 1 0.5 1.5 0 0.58 0.48 A A • Coast Hw. EW TS 1.5 1.5 0 1.5 1.5 2> 2 3 d 1 4 d 0.86 0.75 D C Newport BI. (NS) at: • Hospital Rd. (EW) TS 1 3 1 1 3 d 2 1 1 1 2 0 0.76 0.85 C D -Improvements TS 2 3 1 1 3 d 2 1 1 1 2 0 0.76 0.79 C C • Via Lido (EW) TS 0 3 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 2> 0.54 0.37 A A • 32nd St. (EW) TS 1 2 d 1 2 0 1.5 0.5 1 0.5 1.5 1>> 0.58 0.67 A B -Improvements TS 1 2 d 1 2 0 2 1 0 1 1 1>> 0.57 0.67 A B Riverside Av. (NS) at: • Coast Hw. (EW) TS 0 1 d 0.5 0.5 1> 1 2 0 1 3 1 0.95 0.91 E E -Improvements TS 0 1 d 0.5 0.5 1> 2 3 0 1 3 0 0.73 0.88 C D Tustin Av. (NS) at: Coast Hw. (EW) TS 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 3 1 0.88 0.77 D C -improvements TS 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 3 1 0.60 0.77 A C MacArthur BI. (NS) at: • Campus Dr. (EW) TS 1 4 1 1 4 1 2 3 d 2 3 1>> 0.77 1.20 C F -Improvements TS 2 4 1 1 3.5 7_5 2 3 d 2 3 1>> 0.77 0.83 C D • Birch St. EW TS 1 3 1 1 4 0 1.5 1.5 0 1 2 1>> 0.77 0.84 C D Von Karman Av. (NS) at: Campus Dr. (EW) TS 1 2 1>> 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 0.72 0.94 C E -improvements TS 1 2 0 1 2 0 2 2 0 1 2 0 0.62 0.87 B D MacArthur BL (NS) at: • Von Karman Av. EW TS 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 2 1>> 2 1 1>> 0.58 0.651 A I B Jamboree Rd. (NS) at • Campus Dr. (EW) TS 2 4 0 2 3 0 2 2 1>> 2 2 1 0.91 1.17 E F t -Improvements TS 2 4 1>' 2 4 0 2 2 0 2 2 1> 0.88 0.90 D D • Birch St. (EW) TS 1 3 0 1 3 1>> 1.5 0.5 1>> 0 1 0 1.00 0.85 E D t -Improvements TS 1 3 0 1 4 1>> 1.5 0.5 1>> 0 1 0 0.89 0.78 D C Campus Dr. (NS) at: Bristol St. N (EW) TS 2 3 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 2 4 0 1.00 1.07 E F I -Improvements TS 2 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0.77 0.86 C D Birch St. (NS) at: • Bristol St. N EW TS 2 2 0 0 1.5 2.5 0 0 0 1.5 3.5 0 0.88 0.72 D C Campus Dr. (NS) at: ` • Bristol St. S EW TS 0 5 0 1 3 0 1.5 2.5 2 0 0 0 0.90 0.78 D C Birch St. (NS) at: • Bristol St. S EW TS 0 2.5 1.5 2 2 0 1.5 3.5 0 0 0 0 0.50 0.52 A A I R 1> TABLE 6 (Page 2 of 3) INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY FOR CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- LEVEL OF TRAFFIC BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND ICU SERVICE L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM INTERSECTION CONTROL' Irvine Av. (NS) at: • Mesa Dr. (EW) TS 1 2 d 1 2 d 1 1 0 1 1 1 1.04 1.27 F F -improvements TS 1 3 d 1 3 d 1 1 0 2 1 0 0.77 0.86 C D • University Dr. (EW) TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 d 1 1 d 1.18 1.08 F F -improvements TS 1 3 0 1 3 1 1_5 1_5 d 1 1 d 0.77 0.78 C C • Santiago Dr. (EW) TS 1 2 0 1 2 d 0 1 d 0 1 d 0.69 0.77 B C • Highland Dr. (EW) TS 1 2 d 1 2 d 0 1 d 0 1 d 0.62 0.64 B B • Dover Dr. (EW) TS 1 2 d 1 2 d 1 1 0 1 1 d 0.78 0.72 C C • Westcliff Dr. EW TS 2 2 d f 2 2 d 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 0.63 0.78 B C Dover Dr. (NS) at: • Westcliff Dr. (EW) TS 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 0 1>> 0 0 0 0.36 0.54 A A • 161h St. (EW) TS 1 2 d 1 2 d 0.5 0.5 d 1 1 1 0.54 0.56 A A • Coast Hw. EW TS 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 3 0 1 3 1>> 0.78 0.90 C D Bayslde Dr. (NS) at: • Coast Hw. (EW) TS 2.5 0.5 0 1 1 d 1 3 1 1 4 0 0.90 0.86 D D MacArthur BI. (NS) at: • Jamboree Rd. (EW) TS 2 3 1> 2 3 1>> 2 3 1>> 2 3 1>> 0.92 0.99 E E -Improvements TS f 2 3 1> 2 3 1>>l 2 4 1>> 3 3 1>> 0.87 0.82 D D Jamboree Rd. (NS) at: • Bristol St. N EW TS 2 3 0 0 2.5 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.68 0.67 B B Bayview PI. (NS) at: • Bristol St. S EW TS 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0.58 0.61 A B Jamboree Rd. (NS) at: • Bristol St. S (EW) TS 0 5 0 0 3 0 1.5 1.5 2 0 0 0 0.93 0.85 E D -Improvements TS 0 6 0 0 4 0 1.5 1.5 2 0 0 0 0.88 0.80 D C • Bayview Wy. (EW) TS 1 4 0 1 4 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 0.47 0.69 A B • Eastbluff Dr./University Dr. (EW) TS 1 3 1 2 3 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 1>> 0.68 0.65 B B • Bison Av. (EW) TS 0 3 d 2 3 1 1 0 1 2 0 2 0.52 0.60 A A • Eastbluff Dr./Ford Rd. (EW) TS 2 3 0 2 3 1 1 1 1>> 1.5 1.5 1 0.78 0.76 C C • San Joaquin Hills Rd. (EW) TS 1 3 1>> 2 3 1 1.5 1.5 1 2 1 1>> 0.60 0.71 A C • Santa Barbara Dr. (EW) TS 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 0 1.5 0.5 1 0.56 0.76 A C • Coast Hw. EW TS 1 2 0 1 2 1>> 3 4 0 2 4 1>> 0.76 0.78 C C Santa Cruz Dr. (NIS) at: I San Joaquin Hills Rd. (EW) TS 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 3 0 0.37 0.35 A A Santa Rosa Dr. (NS) at: • San Joaquin Hills Rd. EW TS 1 1 1> 1 1 1 1 3 0 2 3 0 0.40 0.70 A B Newport Center Dr. (NS) at: • Coast Hw, EW TS 0 0 0 2 0 1>> 2 3 0 0 3 1>> 0.47 0.63 A B Avocado Av. (NS) at • San Miguel Dr. (EW) TS 1 1 1> 1 1 1> 1 2 0 2 2 0 0.38 0.80 B C • Coast Hw. EW TS 1 1 1 1.5 0.5 1 1 3 d 1 3 1 0.72 0.77 C C SR-73 NB Ramps (NIS) at: • Bison Av. EW TS 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 0.52 0.61 A B SR-73 SIB Ramps (NS) at: I I • Bison Av. EW TS 0 0 0 2 0 1» 0 2 1 2 2 0 0.43 0.33 A A TABLE 6 (Page 3 of 3) INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY FOR CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- LEVEL OF TRAFFIC BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND ICU SERVICE L T R L T R L T R L T R I AM I PM AM PM INTERSECTION CONTROLZ MacArthur BI. (NS) at: • Bison Av. (EW) TS 2 4 1>> 2 4 1> 2 2 1>> 2 2 1 0.74 0.77 C C • Ford Rd./Bonita Canyon Dr. (EW) TS 2 4 1>> 2 4 1>> 2 2 1 2 2 1>> 0.78 0.98 C E -Improvements TS 2 4 1 3 4 1>> 2 2 1 2 2 1>> 0.78 0.88 C D • San Joaquin Hills Rd. (EW) TS 2 3 1 2 3 1>> 2 3 0 1 2 1>> 0.79 1.11 C F -improvements TS 2 4 0 3 3 1>> 3 3 0 1 2 1>> 0.65 0.81 B D • San Miguel Dr. (EW) TS 2 3 1 2 3 1> 2 2 0 2 2 d 0.66 0.75 B C • Coast Hw. EW TS 0 0 0 2 0 1>> 2 3 0 0 3 1>> 0.71 0.77 C C SR-73 NB Ramps (NS) at: Bonita Canyon Dr. (EW) TS 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 1.05 0.77 F C -improvements TS 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 2 0 0.84 10.64 D 1 B SR-73 SB Ramps (NS) at: I • Bonita Canyon Dr. EW TS 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 3 0 0.46 0.65 A B Spyglass Hill Rd. (NS) at: I • San Miguel Dr. EW TS 0 1 d 0 1 1 1 2 d 1 2 d 0.30 0.37 A A San Miguel Dr. (NS) at: • San Joaquin Hills Rd. (EW) TS 1 2 0 1 2 1> 2 3 0 1 3 0 0.56 0.74 A C Goldenrod Av. (NS) at: • Coast Hw. EW TS 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 d 1 2 d 0.99 0.69 E B Marguerite Av. (NS) at: • San Joaquin Hills Rd. (EW) TS 1.5 0.5 1 1 1 0 1 2 1> 1 3 d 0.44 0.52 A A • Coast Hw. EW TS 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 0.98 0.97 E E Spyglass Hill Rd. (NS) at: • San Joaquin Hills Rd. EW TS 1 1 0 1 1 d 1 2 1 1 2 d 0.62 0.50 B I A Poppy Av. INS) at: • Coast Hw. EW TS 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 0.70 0.75 B C Newport Coast Dr. (NS) at: • SR-73 NB Ramps (EW) TS 0 2 1>> 0 2 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0.5 0.63 0.39 B A • San Joaquin Hills Rd. (EW) TS 2 3 0 0 3 1 1 0 2> 0 0 0 0.64 0.50 B A • Coast Hw. EW TS 1 1 1 1 2 1 1>> 1 3 1 1 1 3 1>> 0.71 0.74 C C Newport BI. (NS) at: 1 1 • Coast Hw. W EW TS 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 1> 0 3 1>> 0.84 0.74 D C When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be s0lped or t width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; > = Ovedap: >> = Fn ' TS=Traffic Slgnal U:\UcJobs\_01100.015001_01200\012321Fxce11101232-01.xlsjr-6 TABLE 7 CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE SR-73 FREEWAY/TOLL WAY MAINLINE ANALYSIS AM SEGMENT ADT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND LANES I VOLUME I LOSI LANES VOLUME LOS 405 Fw. to Bear St. 134,000 3 10,638 F 3 3,432 C -with anticipated regional im rovements2 5 F 4 B .with additional improvements 6 D 6 A Bear St. to 55 Fw. 158,000 3 12,544 F 3 4,046 C -with anticipated regional im rovements 2 5 F 5 B -with additional improvements 8 D 6 B 55 Fw. to Jamboree Rd. 134,000 3 10,638 F 3 3,432 C -with anticipated regional im rovements 2 5 F 5 B :with additional improvements 6 D 6 A Jamboree Rd. to Bonita Canyon Dr. 96,000 3 7,621 F 3 2,459 B -with anticipated regional improvements' 5 D 5 A Bonita Canyon Dr. to Newport Coast Dr. 136,000 4 10,797., F 4 3,483 B -with anticipated re Tonal improvements' 6 • E 6 additional im rovements 7 D 6 New ort Coast Dr. to Toll Plaza with antici ated re Tonal im rovements2 127,000 3 10,083:: : - F 3 3,252 JA-with 5. F 6 -with additional im rovements 6 D 6 PM SEGMENT ADT I NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND I LANES VOLUME-,LOS LANES VOLUME LOS 405 Fw. to Bear St. 134,000 3 5,604 E 3 9,069 F -with anticipated regional improvements2 5 C 4 F with additional improvements 6 B 6 D Bear St. to 55 Fw. 158,000 3 6,607 ' ,. F 3 10,694 F -with anticipated regional improvements2 5 C 5 F -with additional improvements 8 B 6 D 55 Fw. to Jamboree Rd. 134,000 3 5,604 E 3 9,069 F -with anticipated regional improvements' 5 C 5 E -with additional improvements 6 B 6 D Jamboree Rd. to Bonita Canyon Dr. 96,000 3 4,015 C 3 6,497 F -with anticipated regional improvements 2 5 B 5 C Bonita Canyon Dr. to New ort Coast Dr. 136,000 4 5,687 C 4 9,205 F -with anticipated regional im rovements 2 6 B 6 D -with additional improvements 7 B 6 D New ort Coast Dr. to Toll Plaza 127,000 3 5,311 D 3 8,596 F with anticipated regional improvements' 5 C 6 C with additional improvements 6 B 6 C 1 = Improvement 2 - Anticipated regional improvements taker U:\UcJobs\_01100-01500\ 01200\01232NE: TABLE 8 CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED LAND USE SR-73 FREEWAY PEAK HOUR RAMP ANALYSIS RAMP MOVE LANES ON FWY. FREEWAY VOLUME RAMP LANES LENGTH OF ACCELERATION DECELERATION LANE(ft) PEAK HOUR VOLUME DENSITY LOS AM PM AM I PM I AM PM AM PM Bristol St. NB Off 5 110,6381 5,604 1 0 2,3101 910 1 54.6 30.3 F D -with improvements NB Off 1 6 110,6381 5,604 2 280 2,310 910 1 34.9 17.0 D B Bristol St. SB Off 5 3,432 9,069 2 2,725 1.380 680 INOM NOM I A A Jamboree Rd. NB On 5 7,621 4,015 1 120 480 850 20.7 17.2 1 C B Jamboree Rd. SB On 5 3,432 1 9,069 1 1,700 610 1,610 14.8 37.5 1 B F -with Improvements SB On 6 3,4321 9,069 1 1,600 610 1,610 12.4 30.4 1 B D MacArthur 61. NB Off 5 7,621 4.015 2 1,480 940 490 0.5 NOM A A MacArthur8l. NB On 5 7,621 4,015 1 340 2.540 2,150 -- -' F F .with improvements NB On 6 7,621 4,015 2 340 2,540 2,150 31.8 24.6 D C MacArthur 81. SB Off 5 2,459 6.497 1 1.340 2.190 2,230 15.4 27.6 Fr- F -wkh improvements SB Off 6 2,459. 6,497 2 1,340 2.190 2.230 1 1.8 8.7 A A Universit Dr. NB On 5 7,621 4,015 1 200 1,330 1,550 22.4 20.5 C C University Dr. SB Off 5 2,459 6,497 1 1,400 810 850 7.0 19.2 A B Bison Av. NB Off 5 7.621 4,015 1 0 520 300 33.9 21.8 D I C Bison Av. NS On 5 71621 4,015 1 250 280 870 18.6 16.0 B B Bison Av. SB Off ' 5' 2,4591 6,497 1 0 1,000 350 20.7 29.0 C D Bison Av. SB On 5 1 Z459 1,6A97 1 740 110 430 9.4 21.1 A C Bonita Canyon Dr. NB Off 6 10,7971 5,6B7 1 1,250 970 220 30.0 11.9 D B Bonita Canyon Dr. NB On 5 7,621 4,015 1 2,440 690 420 46.1 22.3 F C -with improvements NS On 5 7,621 4,015 1 1,065 690 420 34.3 20.4 D C Bonita Canyon Dr. SB Off 5 2,459 2,459 1 0 410 510 17.3 29.9 B D Bonita Canyon Dr. SB On 5 6,497 6,497 1 400 300 790 10.8 19.5 B B Newport Coast Dr. NB Off 5 10,083 5,311 1 0 530 280 42.6 25.6 F C -with improvements NB Off 6 10,083 5,311 1 1 240 530 280 34.5 21.1 D C New ort Coast Dr. NB On 5 10,083 5,311 1 1,250 580 330 52.6 27.2 F C -with Improvements NB On 6 110,083 5,311 1 1 880 580 330 34.9 20.5 D C Newport Coast Dr. SB Off 6 1 3,483. 9,205 1 0 680 1,0601 20.8 37.1 C E -with Improvements SB Off 6 3,483 9,205 1 240 680 1,060 18.7 35.0 B D Newport Coast Dr. SB On 6 3,483 9,205 1 360 470 570 13.1 21.6 B C Ramp failure due to ramp volumes over capacity. 1 = Improvement U:\UcJobsl 0110D-01500\ 01200\01232\Excel\[01232-41.xls]T-8 27 L 1 1 1 1 t 1a. Bluff & Coast Hw. City Council Adopted Land Use , AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C 0 0 0 NBR 0 3200 70 .022* 80 .025* SBT 0 SBR 2 3200 285 .089 330 .103 EBL 2 3200 630 .197* 620 .194* EBT 3 4800 3020 .629 2420 .504 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBT 3 4800 2080 .433* 2920 .608* WBR 1 1600 100 .063 180 .113 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1b. 15th & Coast Hw. .652 .827 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 0 0 NBT 0 0 0 0 NBR 3200 70 .022* 80 .025* SBT 0 SBR 2 3200 285 .089 330 .103 EBL 2 3200 630 .197 620 .194* EBT 3 4800 3020 .629* 2420 .504 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBT 3 4800 2047 .426 2815 .586* WBR 1 1600 103 .064 185 .116 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 651 .805 A-3 2. Superior & Placentia City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 110 .069 130 .081* NBT 2 3200 960 .300* 430 134 NBR 1 1600 50 031 30 .019 SBL 1 1600 30 .019* 30 .019 SBT 2 3200 240 .075 710 .222* SBR d 1600 20 .013 10 .006 EBL 1 1600 10 006 10 .006 EBT 1 1600 410 .256* 270 .169* EBR 1 1600 160 .100 230 .144 WBL 0.5 10 {.006}* 20 {.012}* WBT 1.5 3200 330 .116 450 .172 WBR 0 30 80 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 3. Superior & Coast Hw. .581 .484 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 180 350 NBT 1.5 4800 510 .175* 190 .144* NBR 0 150 150 SBL 1.5 120 250 SBT 1.5 4800 130 .052* 400 .135* SBR 2 3200 10 .003 390 .122 EBL 2 3200 500 .156 50 .016 EBT 3 4800 2660 .554* 1440 .300* EBR d 1600 210 .131 290 .181 WBL 1 1600 120 .075* 270 .169* WBT 4 6400 560 .088 2710 .423 WBR d 1600 240 .150 200 .125 p for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .856 .748 G, 4. Newport & Hospital City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 150 .094 190 .119* NBT 3 4800 2300 .479* 1170 .244 NBR 1 1600 10 .006 130 .081 SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 10 .006 SBT 3 4800 1310 .273 2130 .444* SBR d 1600 230 .144 200 .125 EBL 2 3200 140 .044 140 .044 EBT 1 1600 350 .219* 250 .156* EBR 1 1600 80 .050 10 .006 WBL 1 1600 50 .031* 210 .131* 3200 250 .084 250 .113 WBR 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 5. Newport & Via Lido 760 .850 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 3 4800 1900 .396* 980 .204* NBR 1 1600 20 .013 40 .025 SBL 2 3200 400 .125* 520 .163* 4800 680 .142 1620 .338 SBT 0 0 0 0 0 EBR WBL 1 1600 30 .019* 10 .006* WBR 2 3200 380 .119 420 .131 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 540 .373 A-5 6. Newport & 32nd City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 60 .038* NBT 2 3200 1170 .366* 810 .253 NBR d 1600 20 .013 30 .019 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 80 .050 SBT 2 3200 730 .269 1440 .534* SBR 0 0 130 270 EBL 1.5 430 160 EBT 0,5 3200 40 .147* 80 075* EBR 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBL 0.5 50 .031 30 WBT 1.5 3200 50 .031* 50 .025* WBR f 200 220 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 7. Riverside & Coast Hw. 582 .672 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 10 1.0061* 20 NBT 1 1600 0 .006 10 .019* NBR d 1600 0 .000 10 .006 SBL 0.5 90 110 {.0691* SBT 0.5 1600 10 .063* 10 .075 SBR 1 1600 370 .231 400 .250 EBL 1 1600 220 .138 340 .213* EBT 2 3200 2680 .841* 2220 .697 EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 WBT 3 4800 1680 .350 2920 .608* WBR 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .030* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 946 .909 8. Tustin & Coast Hw. City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 01 0 NBT 1600 0 .006 .006 NBR 0 0 10 10 30 50 SBT 11 1600 .044* .069* SBR 0 0 40 60 EBL 1 1600 110 .069 160 .100* 3200 2650 .831* 2070 .650 EBR 0 10 0 WBT 3 480 1690 .352 2860, .596* WBR 1 1600 40 .025 110 .069 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 9. MacArthur & Campus City Council Adopted Land Use LANES CAPACITY 4 NBT 6400 NBR 1 1600 6400 SBT 4 SBR 1 1600 EBT 3 4800 EBR d 1600 4800 WBT 3 WBR f Right Turn Adjustment 875 .765 VOL V/C VOL V/C 120 .075 280 .175* 1500 .234* 1500 .234 110 .069 80 .050 250 .156* 160 .100 1100 .172 1380 .216* 500 .313 920 .575 810 .253* 490 .153* 970 .202 680 .142 190 .119 130 .081 60 .019 160 .050 620 .129* 1440 .300* SBR .359* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .772 1.203 10. MacArthur & Birch City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 50 .031 170 .106* NBT 3 4800 1330 .277* 1030 .215 NBR 1 1600 130 .081 60 .038 SBL 1 1600 250 .156* 140 .088 SBT 4 6400 820 .171 1200 .231* SBR 0 0 280 .175 280 EBL 1.5 510 410 EBT 1.5 4800 550 .231* 460 .194* EBR 0 50 60 WBL 1 1600 50 .031 130 .081 WBT 2 3200 330 .103* 980 .306* WBR f 20 350 'Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 11. Von Karman & Campus .767 .837' City Council Adopted Land Use HOUR HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLK NBL 1 1600 30 .019 10 .006* NBT 2 3200 910 .284* 580 .181 NBR f 40 50 SBL 1 1600 40 .025* 170 .106 SBT 2 3200 560 .206 1070 .419* SBR 0 0 100 270 EBL 1 1600 360 .225* 240 .150* EBT 2 3200 680 .213 1010 .316 EBR 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 WBL 1 1600 60 .038 40 .025 WBT 2 3200 500 .184* 1010 .366* WBR 0 0 90 160 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .718 .941 1 12. MacArthur & Von Karman City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 140 .088 60 .038* NBT 3 4800 1460 .304* 910 .190 NBR 1 1600 600 .375 190 .119 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 110 .069 SBT 3 4800 600 .125 1210 .252* SBR 1 1600 190 .119 110 .069 EBL 1 1600 40 .025* 140 .088 EBT 3200 160 .050 300 .094* EBR f 12 WBL 2 3200 180 .056 840 .263* WBT 1600 2220 •138* 2160 0 .131 WBR f Right Turn Adjustment NBR .071* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 13. Jamboree & Campus 576 647 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 .044 160 .050* NBT 4 6400 1860 .336* 1950 .406 NBR 0 0 290 750 .469 SBL 2 3200 670 .209* 480 .150 SBT 3 4800 1780 .440 2610 .600* SBR 0 0 330 270 EBL 2 3200 190 .059 610 .191* EBT 2 3200 320 .100* 850 .266 EBR WBL 2 3200 850 .266* 360 .113 WBT 2 3200 770 .241 660 .206* WBR 1 1600 200 .125 530 .331 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .125* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .911 1.172 A-9 14. Jamboree & Birch City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 430 .269* 170 .106* 4800 1970 .410 1830 .400 NBR 0 SBL 1 1600 10 .006 90 .056 SBT 3 4800 2030 .423* 2030 .423* SBR f 910 400 EBL 1.5 240 700 EBT 0.5 3200 90 .103* 20 .225* EBR f 20 460 80 WBT 1 1600 i0 .200* .094* WBR 0 0 170 10 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 15. Campus & Bristol (N) 0.995 .848 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 540 .169 600 .188* NBT 3 4800 3210 .669* 1710 .356 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBT 4 6400 470 .073 1850 .289* SBR 2 3200 410 .128 1270 .397 EBL 0 0 0 0 EBT EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 2 3200 310 .097 560 .175 WBT 4 6400 1860 .331* 2960 .481* WBR 0 0 260 120 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .108* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1.000 1.066 A-10 16. Birch & Bristol (N) City Council Adopted Land Use LANES CAPACITY NBL 2 3200 NBT 2 3200 NBR 0 0 SBL 0 0 SBT 1.5 6400 SBR 2.5 EBL 0 0 EBT 0 0 EBR 0 0 WBL WBT 3.5 8000 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 120 .038 190 .059* 1230 .384* 510 .159 0 0 0 0 210 .080 810 .367* 300 1540 0 0 0 0 0 0 1700 .354* 1740 .298* 800 .500 130 WBR .146* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 17. Campus/Irvine & Bristol (S) 884 . /L4 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 5 8000 2380 .363* 1770 .269* NBR 0 0 520 380 SBL 1 1600 120 .075* 340 .213* 4800 680 .142 20600 .429 SBR p EBL 1.5 1360 (.464)* 560 (.294)* EBT 2.5 6400 1610 .464 1320 .294 EBR 2 3200 660 .206 620 .194 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .902 .776 A-11 18. Birch & Bristol (S) City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 2.5 6400 540 .142* 310 092 NBR 1.5 370 280 SBL 2 3200 240 .075* 420 .131 SBT 2 3200 430 .134 900 .281* SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 1.5 890 {.286}* 330 EBT 3.5 8000 1190 .286 1450 .239* EBR 0 210 130 WBL 0 0 0 WBT 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 19. Irvine & Mesa 503 .520 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 90 .056 40 .025* NBT 2 3200 2120 .663* 910 .284 NBR d 1600 580 .363 150 .094 SBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 SBT 2 3200 1030 .322 2240 .700* SBR d 1600 60 .038 200 .125 EBL 1 1600 260 .163 100 .063 EBT 1 1600 400 .275* 80 .188* EBR 0 0 40 220 WBL 1 1600 160 .100* 571 .357* WBT 1 1600 70 .044 459 .287 WBR 1 1600 10 006 10 .006 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1.044 1.270 A-12 20. Irvine & University City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 240 .150 180 .113* NBT 2 3200 2480 .775* 1060 .331 NBR 1 1600 60 .038 20 .013 SBL 1 1600 90 .056* 40 .025 SBT 2 3200 990 .309 2620 .819* SBR 1 1600 130 .081 430 .269 EBL 1 1600 520 .325* 150 .094* EBT 1 1600 110 .069 30 .019 EBR d 1600 200 .125 170 .106 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBT 1 1600 40 .025* 80 .050* WBR d 1600 20 .013 50 .031 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 21. Irvine & Santiago City Council Adopted Land Use LANES CAPACITY 1 10 NBT 2 3200 NBR 0 0 SBT 2 3200 SBR d 1600 EBT -1 1600 EBR d 1600 WBT 1 1600 WBR d 1600 Right Turn Adjustment 1.181 1.076 VOL V/C 120 1510 .475* 10 910 .284 40 .025 140 {.125}* 120 .075 20 140 .088 WBR .032* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION PM VOL HOUR L 170 .106* 1090 .347 100 .063 18* 20 .075 660 {'0057)* 130 .081 10 i0 .044 ' A-13 22. Irvine & Highland City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 90 .056 100 .063* NBT 2 3200 1620 .506* 1320 .413 NBR d 1600 10 .006 20 .013 SBL 1 1600 20 .013* 20 .013 SBT 2 3200 1110 .347 1690 .528* SBR d 1600 20 .013 70 .044 EBL 0 0 80 {.0501* 20 {0121* EBT 1 1600 10 .056 30 .631 EBR d 1600 120 .075 70 .044 WBT 1 1600 20 .025* 50 .038* WBR d 1600 60 .038 10 .006 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .025* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .619 .641 23. Irvine & Dover City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 40 .625 NBT 2 3200 1330 .416* 1120 .350* NBR d 1600 20 .013 20 .013 SBL 1 1600 170 .106* 270 .169* SBT 2 13200 910 .284 1400 .438 SBR d 1600 20 .013 60 .038 EBL 1 1600 100 .063* 50 .031* EBT 1 1600 150 .138 110 .150 EBR 0 0 70 130 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 40 .025 WBT 1 1600 150 .094* 270 .169* WBR d 1600 310 .194 200 .125 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .100* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .779 .719 24. Irvine & Westcliff City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 90 .028 280 .088* NBT 2 3200 970 .303* 770 .241 NBR d 1600 50 .031 20 .013 SBL 2 3200 230 .072* 70 .022 SBT 2 3200 710 .222 910 .284* SBR d 1600 160 .100 450 .281 EBL 2 3200 340 .106* 320 .100* EBR 3200 4770 .175 540 .219 0 WBL 1 1600 30 .019 90 .056 2 3200 4300 .150* 910 .303*60 WBR 50 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 25. Dover & Westcliff 631 .775 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 280 .088* 850 .266* NBT 2 3200 440 .138 590 .184 NBR SBT 11 1600 400 .250* 350 .219* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 40 .025 EBL 2 3200 80 .025* 160 .050* 0 EBR f 530 870 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 363 .535 A-15 26. Dover & 16th City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 80 .050* 230 .144* NBT 2 3200 750 .234 1190 .372 NBR d 1600 10 .006 60 .038 SBL 1 1600 50 .031 50 .031 SBT 2 3200 1000 .313* 880 .275* SBR d 1600 30 .019 50 .031 30 EBT 0.5 1600 10 .019* .031* EBR d 1600 240 .150 190 .119 WBL 1 1600 40 .025* 40 .025* WBT 1 1600 10 .006 30 .019 WBR 1 1600 50 .031 50 .031 Right Turn Adjustment EBR .131* EBR .088* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 27. Dover & Coast Hw. .538 .563 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 NBT 1 1600 30 .019* 20 .013* NBR 1 1600 30 .019 10 .006 SBL 3 4800 1040 .217* 990 .206* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 20 .013 SBR 1 1600 80 .050 100 .063 EBL 2 3200 190 .059 130 .041* EBT 3 4800 2590 .542* 2070 .435 EBR 0 0 10 20 WBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 WBT 3 4800 1740 .363 3070 .640* WBR f 720 1130 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 784 .900 A-16 28. Bayside & Coast Hw. City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2.5 430 310 4800 .121* 30 .077* NBR 0.5 130 30 SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 140 .088* SBT 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 SBR d 1600 50 .031 120 .075 EBL 1 1600 90 .056 140 .088* EBT 3 4800 3320 .692* 2250 .469 EBR 1 1600 410 .256 630 .394 WBL 1 1600 90 .056* 60 .038 WBR 4 6400 1760 .295 3850 .609* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 29. MacArthur & Jamboree 9UU .dbZ City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 200 .063 240 .075* NBT 3 4800 1910 .398* 830 .173 NBR 1 1600 590 .369 540 .338 SBL 2 3200 130 .041* 270 .084 SBT 3 4800 520 .108 1580 .329* SBR f 120 500 EBL 2 3200 690 .216 220 .069 EBT 4800 1720 .358* 1440 .300* EBR f WBL 2 3200 380 .119* 900 .281* 4800 1130 .215 1620 .338 WBR f Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 916 .9tib A-17 30. Jamboree & Bristol (N) City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 1120 .350 930 .291* 4800 3260 .679* 2500 .521 NBR 0 SBL SBT 2.5 6400 720 .213 1460 .378* SBR 1.5 640 960 EBT 0 0 0 0 EBR WBT 0 0 0 WBR 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 31. Bayview Place & Bristol (S) 679 .669 City•Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 0 NBR 2 32 80 .025 360 .113 SBT 0 0 0 0 SBR EBT 4 6400 3570 .558* 3200 .500* EBR 1 1600 120 .075 10 .006 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .025* NBR .113* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .583 .613 MU 32. Jamboree & Bristol (S) City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 5 8000 2100 .270* 2340 .306 NBR 0 0 60 110 SBT 3 4800 690 .144 1490 .310* EBL 1.5 2110 .659* 1090 1.5401* EBT 1.5 4800 550 .344 1500 .540 EBR 2 3200 1000 .313 980 .306 WBR 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 33. Jamboree & Bayview Way .vzv .uov City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 140 .088 70 .044 NBT 4 6400 1970 .322* 2200 .358* NBR 0 0 90 90 SBL 1 1600 130 .081* 160 .100* 1180 2280 SBR 1 1600 .113 .050 EBL 2 3200 40 .013* 90 .028 80 EBR 1 1600 40 .025 106 .11113* WBL 1 1600 10 .006 50 .031* 60 WBR 1 1600 .038* 160 .1100 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .044* Multi .198* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 46b .bya A-19 34. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Univ. City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 NBT 3 4800 1610 .335* 1900 .396* NBR 1 1600 250 .156 360 .225 SBL 2 3200 140 .044* 210 .066* SBT 3 4800 1050• .219 1920 .400 SBR 1 1600 270 .169 360 .225 EBL 1.5 520 210 EBT 0.5 3200 120 .200* 100 .097* EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 1.5 330 .103* 300 .094* WBT 1.5 4800 110 .069 130 .081 WBR f 190 230 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 35. Jamboree & Bison .682 .653 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 3 4800 1630 .340* 1870 .390* NBR d 1600 340 .213 250 .156 SBL 2 3200 90 .028* 140 .044* SBT 3 4800 1230 .256 1800 .375 SBR 1 1600 50 .031 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 110 .069* 40 .025* EBT 0 EBR 1 1600 80 .050 20 .013 'WBL 2 3200 250 .078* 460 .144* WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR 2 3200 200 .063 180 .056 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .515 .603 A-20 I 1 1 1 1 36. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Ford City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 380 .119* 390 .122* NBT 3 4800 1770 .413 2050 .508 NBR 0 0 210 390 SBL 2 3200 60 .019 60 .019 SBT 3 4800 1600 .333* 2270 .473* SBR 1 1600 60 .038 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 160 .100 50 .031 EBT 1 1600 210 .131* 130 .081* EBR f 420 360 WBL 1.5 430 260 WBT 1.5 4800 520 .198* 150 .085* WBR 1 1600 90 .056 20 .013 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 37. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills 781 .761 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 80 .050 4800 1400 .292* 1960 .408* NBR f 13 SBL 2 3200 620 .194* 610 .191* SBT 3 4800 1630 .340 2340 .488 SBR 1 1600 40 .025 200 .125 EBL 1.5 280 .088* 90 .028* EBT 1.5 4800 50 .031 30 .019 EBR 1 1600 50 .031 40 .025 WBL 2 3200 70 .022* 250 .078* 1600 .006 .038 WWBT BT f 410 720 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .596 .705 A-21 38. Jamboree & Santa Barbara City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 3 4800 1620 .338* 1830 .381* NBR 1 1600 190 .119 90 .056 SBL 2 3200 410 .128* 310 .097* SBT 3 4800 1260 .263 2030 .423 SBR 1 1600 10 .006 30 .019 EBL 1 1600 60 .038* 20 .013 EBT 1 1600 10 .025 10 .019* EBR 0 0 30 20 WBL 1.5 80 470 WBT 0.5 3200 10 .028* 10 .150* WBR 1 1600 90 .056 420 .263 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .028* WBR .113* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 39. Jamboree & Coast Hw. .560 .760 City Council Adopted Land Use NV/C HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 1 1600 20 .013 40 .025 NBT 2 3200 570 .206* 380 .156* NBR 0 0 90 120 SBL 1 1600 170 .106* 130 .081* SBT 2 3200 290 .091 640 .200 SBR f 850 1800 EBL 3 4800 1310 .273* 870 .181* 64000 21500 .339 16000 .252 EBR 0 WBL 2 3200 100 .031 230 .072 WBT 4 6400 1130 .177* 2310 .361* WBR f 110 120 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .762 .779 A-22 40. Santa Cruz & San Joaquin H. City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 110 .034 410 .128* 1600 40 .031* .125 NBR 0 1110 SBL 1 1600 20 .013* 10 .006 SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006* SBR 1 1600 70 .044 60 .038 EBL 1 1600 60 .038 100 .063* EBT 3 4800 480 .148* 400 .125 EBR 0 0 230 260 .163 WBL 1 1600 230 .144* 30 .019 WBT 3 4800 350 .079 540 .119* WBR 0 0 30 30 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .034* SBR .032* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 41. Santa Rosa & San Joaquin H. 370 .348 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 180 .113* NBT 1 1600 20 .013* 30 .019 NBR 1 1600 180 .113 740 .463 SBL 1 1600 110 .069* 100 .063 SBT 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006* SBR 1 1600 20 .013 50 .031 EBL 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 EBT 3 4800 320 .088* 590 .144* EBR 0 0 100 100 WBL 2 3200 750 .234* 420 .131* WBR 4800 530 .133 2660 .073 0 90 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .301* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 404 .695 A-23 42. Newport Center & Coast Hw. City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 0 0 0 0 SBL 2 3200 30 .009* 280 .088* 0 SBR f 90 840 EBL 2 3200 590 .184* 360 .113* EBT 3 4800 1980 .413 1710 .356 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBT 3 4800 1340 .279* 2040 .425* WBR f 180 160 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 44. Avocado & San Miguel .472 .626 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 140 .088 70 .044 NBT 1 1600 160 .100* 30 .019* NBR 1 1600 80 .050 630 .394 SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 240 .150* SBT 1 1600 60 .038 190 .119 SBR 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 EBT 2 3200 140 .053 700 .,259* EBR 0 0 30 130 WBL 2 3200 560 .175 360 .113* WBT 2 3200 550 .238* 640 .222 WBR 0 0 210 70 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .262* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 375 .803 A-24 I 45. Avocado & Coast Hw. City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 110 .069* 160 .100* NBT 1 1600 50 .031 110 .069 NBR 1 1600 250 .156 160 .100 SBL 1.5 80 .050 370 SBT 0.5 3200 90 .056* 150 .163* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 300 .188 EBL 1 1600 300 .188* 170 ..106 EBT 3 4800 1680 .350 1760 .367* EBR d 1600 80 .050 80 .050 WBL 1 1600 130 .081 190 .119* WBT 3 4800 1540 .321* 1810 .377 WBR 1 1600 140 .088 60 .038 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .087* SBR .025* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison 721 .774 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 180 {.108}* 210 .066* NBT 0 4800 0 .108 0 NBR 1.5 340 90 .056 SBL 0 0 0 0 SBT SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006* 3200 1330 .416* 710 .222 EBR p WBT 2 3200 130 .041 720 .225* WBR 1 1600 260 .163 860 .538 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .313* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 524 .610 ' A-25 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 0 0 0 NBR 0 2 3200 990 .309* 340 .106* SBT SBR f 10 10 EBT 2 3200 330 .103* 340 .106* EBR 1 1600 40 .025 70 .044 WBL 2 3200 70 .022* 360 .113* 2 3200 240 .075 540 .169 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 48. MacArthur & Bison AM .3L0 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 420 .131 300 .094* 6400 36110 .564* 2620 .409 NBR f SBL 2 3200 50 .016* 20 .006 SBT 4 6400 2670 .417 3050 .477* SBR 1 1600 370 .231 440 .275 EBL 2 3200 290 .091* 310 .097* 3200 240 .075 190 .059 EBR f 11 WBL 2 3200 130 .041 210 .066 WBT 2 3200 210 .066* 320 .100* WBR 1 1600 10 .006 20 .013 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ./a/ .ions A-26 49. MacArthur & Ford/Bonita Cyn City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 .044* 80 .025 6400 2130 .331 2430 .380* NBR f 540 SBL 2 3200 360 .113 1040 .325* 6400 2980 .466* 24550 .383 SBR f EBL 2 3200 40 .013* 10 .003 EBT 2 3200 370 .116 610 .191* EBR 1 1600 90 .056 110 .069 WBL 2 3200 400 .125 280 .088* WBT 2 3200 830 .259* 380 .119 WBR f 1650 700 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 50. MacArthur & San Joaquin H. 782 .984 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 70 .022 20 .006 NBT 3 4800 1540 .321* 1800 .375* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 20 .013 SBL 2 3200 600 .188* 930 .291* SBT 3 4800 1790 .373 1850 .385 SBR f 1080 470 EBL 2 3200 220 .069* 1050 .328* 4800 320 .075 6330 .152 EBT 0 10 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBT 2 3200 680 .213* 360 .113* WBR f 1040 530 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .791 1.107 A-27 51. MacArthur & San Miguel City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 130 .041 200 .063* NBT 3 4800 1510 .315* 880 .183 NBR 1 1600 350 .219 450 .281 SBL 2 3200 10 .003* 10 .003 SBT 3 4800 1070 .223 1400 .292* SBR 1 1600 800 .500 560 .350 EBL 2 3200 90 .028 960 .300* EBT 2 3200 110 .056* 510 .206 EBR 0 0 70 150 WBL 2 3200 300 .094* 300 .094 WBT 2 3200 350 .109 300 .094* WBR d 1600 20 .013 30 .019 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .195* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 52. MacArthur & Coast Hw. .663 .749 City Council Adopted Land Use AM HOUR HOUC LANES CAPACITY VOL L VOLK NBL 0 0 0 NBT 0 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBL 2 3200 500 .156* 700 .219* 0 SBR f 370 780 EBL 2 3200 880 .275* 640 .200* 4800 1110 .231 1540 .321 EBR 0 WBT 3 4800 1320 .275* 1670 .348* WBR f 820 540 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .706 .767 53. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bonita Cyn City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 370 .116* 20 .006* BT 0 NBR 1 160 600 .375 200 .125 SBT 0 0 0 0 SBR 0 0 EBT 2 320EL 800 .250* 1250 .391* EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 1 1600 680 .425* 410 .256* 3200 1260 .394 1200 .375 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .259* NBR .119* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 54. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Cyn 1.050 .772 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 180 .056* 140 .044* NBR 1 1600 230 .144 370 .231 SBL 0 0 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBT 2 3200 530 .166 810 .253* EBR 1 1600 160 .100 560 .350 WBL 2 3200 140 .044 230 .072* 4800 1500 .313* 1010 .210 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .088* Multi .284* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 457 .653 A-29 55, Spyglass Hill & San Miguel City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 40 (.025}* 30 {.019}* NBT 1 1600 40 ,050 20 .631 NBR d 1600 180 .113 190 .119 0 40 SBT 1600 .050* 30 .031* SBR 1 1600 40 .025 40 025 EBL 1 1600 50 .031 70 .044 EBT 2 3200 340 .106* 500 .156* EBR d 1600 30 .019 50 .031 WBL 1 1600 90 .056* 130 .081* WBT 2 3200 380 .119 430 .134 WBR d 1600 30 .019 40 .025 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .063* NBR OB1* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 56. San Miguel & San Joaquin H. .300 .368 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 006 10 .006 NBT 2 3200 250 .134* 580 .291* NBR 0 0 180 350 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 140 .088* SBT 2 3200 470 .147 330 .103 SBR 1 1600 400 .250 140 .088 EBL 2 3200 290 .091* 460 .144 EBT 3 4800 640 .135 920 .194* EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 1 1600 400 .250 270 .169* WBT 3 4800 1340 .300* 670 .154 WBR 0 0 100 70 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 563 .742 A-30 57. Goldenrod & Coast Hw. City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 112 .070* 84 .053* NBT 16000 .015 .013 NBR 0 24 20 SBL 60 30 SBT 1 1600 .076* .039* SBR 0 0 60 27 EBL 1 1600 30 .019* 33 .021 EBT 2 3200 1003 .313 1869 .584* EBR d 1600 43 .027 53 .033 WBL 1 1600 42 .026 22 .014* WBT 2 3200 2633 .823* 1658 .518 WBR d 1600 13 .008 13 .008 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 58. Marguerite & San Joaquin H. City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 370 240 NBT 0.5 3200 40 .128* 60 .094* NBR 1 1600 20 .013 70 .044 SBL 1 1600 50 .031 70 .044 SBT 1 1600 40 .050* 50 .056* SBR 0 0 40 40 EBL 1 1600 30 .019* 40 .025 EBT 2 3200 490 .153 970 .303* EBR 1 1600 150 .094 420 .263 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 110 .069* WBT 3 4800 1170 .244* 710 .148 WBR d 1600 80 .050 40 .025 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .441 I 5zz ' A-31 59. Marguerite & Coast Hw. City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 90 .056 NBT 1 1600 180 .169* 200 .150* NBR 0 0 90 40 SBL 1 1600 210 .131* 250 .156* 1600 40 .075 130 .106 SBR 0 EBL 1 1600 70 .044* 60 .038 EBT 2 3200 1330 .416 1830 .572* EBR 1 1600 40 .025 80 .050 WBL 1 1600 60 .038 140 .088* WBT 2 3200 2000 .638* 1500 .491 WBR 0 0 40 70 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 60. Spyglass H. & San Joaquin H. .982 .966 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 NBT 1 1600 10 .019* 10 .025* NBR 0 0 20 30 SBL 1 1600 70 .044* 40 .025* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR d 1600 250 .156 150 .094 EBL 1 1600 80 .050* 260 .163* EBT 2 3200 700 .219 980 .306 EBR 1 1600 20 .013 60 .038 WBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 2 3200 1190 .372* 680 .213* WBR d 1600 80 .050 80 .050 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .131* SBR .075* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 616 .501 A-32 61. Poppy & Coast Hw. City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 30 .019 1600 10 .019* 10 .050* NBR 0 SBL 0 0 70 {.0441* 140 (.087)* 1600 10 .056 .100 SSBT BR 1 i0 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 30 .019 3200 1480 .466 1890 .594* EBR 0 10 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 30 .019* 3200 1940 .628* 1640 .528 WBR 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 62. Newport Coast & SR-73 NB W 750 City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 2 3200 1480 .463* 980 .306* NBR f 510 330 3200 600 .188 900 .281 SBR 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 EBR WBL 1.5 420 270 WBT 0 3200 0 .166* 0 .088* WBR 0.5 110 10 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 629 .394 A-33 64. Newport Coast & San Joaquin City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 .044 120 .038* NBT 3 4800 1630 .340* 980 .204 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBT 3 4800 1040 .217 1140 .238* SBR 1 1600 250 .156 460 .288 EBL 1 1600 480 .300* 270 .169* EBR 2 3200 170 .053 190 .059 WBL 0 0 0 0 WBT WBR 0 0 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .050* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for EBR TOTAI CAPACITY UTILIZATION .640 .495 65. Newport Coast & Coast Hw. City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBL 2 3200 400 .125* 1150 .359* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR f 240 340 EBL 1 1600 400 .250* 200 .125* EBT 3 4800 1020 .213 1620 .338 EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 3 4800 1560 .325* 1220 .254* WBR f 1120 500 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .706 .744 A-34 66. Newport B1. (W) & Coast Hw. City Council Adopted Land Use AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C 0 0 0 NBR 0 SBL 2 3200 610 .191* 770 .241* SBR 1 1600 200 .125 410 .256 EBT 2 3200 2090 .653* 1310 .409 EBR f 150 180 WBL WBT 03 4800 930 .194 2300 .479* WBR f 890 1350 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .015* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .844 ./3b A-35 I 1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1 I A-36 I I F1 ATTACHMENT B City Council Adopted Land Use Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Worksheets (With Improvements) II 1 'J r_ I 4. Newport & Hospital City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 150 .047 190 .059* NBT 3 4800 2300 .479* 1170 .244 NBR 1 1600 10 .006 130 .081 SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 10 .006 SBT 3 4800 1310 .273 2130 .444* SBR d 1600 230 .144 200 .125 EBL 2 3200 140 .044 140 .044 EBT 1 1600 350 .219* 250 .156* EBR 1 1600 80 .050 10 .006 WBL 1 1600 50 .031* 210 .131* 3200 220 .084 110 113 WBR 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 6. Newport & 32nd .760 .790 City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 60 .038* NBT 2 3200 1170 .366* 810 .253 NBR d 1600 20 .013 30 .019 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 80 .050 SBT 2 3200 730 .269 1440 .534* SBR 0 0 130 270 EBL 2 3200 430 .134* 160 .050 EBT 1 1600 40 .038 80 .063* EBR 0 0 20 20 WBL 1 1600 50 .031 30 .019 WBT 1 1600 50 .031* 50 .031* WBR f 200 220 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 569 .666 I: 7. Riverside & Coast Hw. City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 10 (.006)* 20 NBT 1 1600 0 .006 10 .019* NBR d 1600 0 .000 10 .006 SBL 0.5 90 110 {.069}* SBT 0.5 1600 10 .063* 10 .075 SBR 1 1600 370 .231 400 .250 EBL 2 3200 220 .069 340 .106* 4800 2680 .560* 2220 .465 EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 4800 1640 .358 2950 .619* WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .099* SBR .068* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 8. Tustin & Coast Hw. ,734 ,881 City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C 1600 •006 .006 NBR 0 10 10 1600 •044* 60 .069* SBR 0 40 EBL 1 1600 110 .069 160 .100* 4800 2650 .554* 200 .433 EBR 0 10 10 WBT 3 4800 1690 .352 2860 .596* WBR 1 1600 40 .025 110 .069 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .598 .765 I- 9. MacArthur & Campus City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 120 .038 280 .088* NBT 4 6400 1500 .234* 1500 .234 NBR 1 1600 110 .069 80 .050 SBL 1 1600 250 .156* 160 .100 SBT 3.5 8000 1100 .200 1380 .288* SBR 1.5 500 920 .288 EBL 2 3200 810 .253* 490 .153* EBT 3 4800 970 .202 680 .142 EBR d 1600 190 .119 130 .081 WBL 2 3200 60 .019 160 .050 WBT 3 4800 620 .129* 1440 .300*190 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 11. Von Karman & Campus 772 .829 City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 10 .006* NBT 2 3200 910 .297* 580 .197 NBR 0 0 40 50 SBL 1 1600 40 .025* 170 .106 SBT 2 3200 560 .206 1070 .419* SBR 0 0 100 270 EBL 2 3200 360 .113* 240 .075* 3200 680 .225 1010 .331 EBR 0 50 WBL 1 1600 60 .038 40 .025 3200 5000 .184* 1010 .366* WBR 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .619 .866 M. 13. Jamboree & Campus City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK'HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 .044 160 050* NBT 4 6400 1860 .291* 1950 .305 NBR 1 1600 290 .181 750 .469 SBL 2 3200 670 .209* 480 .150 SBT 4 6400 1780 330 2610 .450* SBR 0 0 330 270 EBL 2 3200 190 .059 610 .191* 3200 320 .109* 850 .272 EBR 0 20 WBL 2 3200 850 .266* 360 .113 WBT 2 3200 770 .241 660 .206* WBR 1 1600 200 .125 530 .331 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .006* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for WBR NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 14. Jamboree & Birch 875 .903 City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 430 .269* 170 .106 4800 1970 .410 1890 .400* NBR 0 30 SBL 1 1600 10 .006 90 .056* 6400 2010 ,317* 2030 .317 SBR f 400 EBL 1.5 240 700 EBT 0.5 3200 90 .103* 20 .225* EBR f 20 460 160 0 200* 80WBR .094* p 7 10 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .889 .775 ffn 15. Campus & Bristol (N) City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 540 .169 600 .188* NBT 4 6400 3210 .502* 1710 .267 NBR SBT 4 6400 470 .073 1850 .289* SBR 3 4800 410 .085 1270 .265 EBT 0 0 0 0 EBR WBL 2 3200 310 .097 560 .175 WBT 5 8000 1860 .265* 2960 .385* WBR 0 0 260 120 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 19. Irvine & Mesa dbL City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 90 .0% 40 .025* 2580 NBR d 1600 .363* 150 .094 SBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 SBT 3 4800 1030 .215 2240 .467* SBR d" 1600 60 .038 200 .125 EBL 1 1600 260 .163 100 .063 1600 440 .275* .188* EBR 0 280 WBL 2 3200 160 .050* 571 .178* WBT 1600 700 .050 4599 .29310 WBR 0 10 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION /73 bbb MN 20. Irvine & University City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 240 .150 180 .113* NBT 3 4800 2480 .529* 1060 .225 NBR 0 0 60 20 SBL 1 1600 90 .056* 40 .025 SBT 3 4800 990 .206 2620 .546* SBR 1 1600 130 .081 430 .269 EBL 1.5 520 .163* 150 .047* EBT 1.5 4800 110 .069 30 .019 EBR d 1600 200 .125 170 .106 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBT 1 1600 40 .025* 80 .050* WBR d 1600 20 .013 50 .031 Right Turn Adjustment EBR .022* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 29. MacArthur & Jamboree .773 .778 City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 200 .063 240 .075* NBT 3 4800 1910 .398* 830 .173 NBR 1 1600 590 .369 540 338 SBL 2 3200 130 .041* 270 .084 SBT 3 4800 520 .108 1580 .329* SBR f 120 500 EBL 2 3200 690 .216* 220 .069 EBT 4 6400 1720 .269 1440 .225* EBR f 130 50 WBL 3 4800 380 .079 900 .188* WBT 3 4800 1030 .215* 1620 .338 WBR f 170 170 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 870 .817 : 32. Jamboree & Bristol (S) City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 6 9600 2100 .225* 2340 .255* NBR 0 0 60 110 SBT 4 6400 690 .108 1490 .233 EBL 1.5 2110 .659* 1090 {.5401* EBT 1.5 4800 550 .344 1500 .540 EBR 2 3200 1000 .313 980 .306 WBL 0 0 0 0 WBT WBR 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 49. MacArthur &Ford/Bonita Cyn 884 d9b City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 .044* 80 .025 NBT 4 6400 2120 .331 2430 .380* NBR 1 1600 130 .081 540 .338 SBL 3 4800 360 .075 1040 .217* SBT 4 6400 2980 .466* 2450 .383 SBR f 10 60 EBL 2 3200 40 .013* 10 .003 EBT 2 3200 370 .116 610 .191* EBR 1 1600 90 .056 110 .069 WBL 2 3200 400 .125 280 .088* WBT 2 3200 830 .259* 380 .119 WBR f 1650 700 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION /bz b/b M 50. MacArthur & San Joaquin H. City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 70 .022* 20 .006 NBT 4 6400 1540 .242 1800 .284* NBR 0 0 10 20 SBL 3 4800 600 .125 930 .194* SBT 3 4800 1790 .373* 1850 .385 SBR f 1080 470 EBL 3 4800 220 .046* 1050 .219* EBT 3 4800 320 075 630 .152 EBR 0 0 40 100 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBT 2 3200 680 213* 360 .113* WBR f 1040 530 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 53. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bonita Cyn .654 .810 City Council Adopted Land Use w/ Imp. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 370 .116* 20 .006* NBR 01 1600 600 .375 200 .125 0 0 0 SBT 0 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBT 2 3200 800 .250* 1250 .391* EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 2 3200 680 .213* 410 .128* WBT 2 3200 1260 .394 1200 .375 WBR 0 0 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .259* NBR .119* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .838 .644 MR 11 I I `- L I II I I I II ATTACHMENT C City Council Adopted Land Use Scenario Freeway Mainline Analysis HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c one: Fax: mail: Operational Analysis i Analyst: Archie Lee Tan ency or Company: Urban Crossroads to Performed: 10/04/2006 alysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound tom/To: 405 Fw. to Bear St. nsdiction: alysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Flow Inputs and Adjustments lume, V 10638 veh/h ak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 ak 15-min volume, v15 2891 v Trucks and buses 5 % ecreational vehicles 0 % main type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi cks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 creational vehicle PCE, ER ta 2.0 avy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Sow rate, vp 4143 pclh/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments In0 width 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi umber of lanes, N 3 ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 milh Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h &feral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h ■terchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 ml/h Wuumber of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h ' Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures Low rate, vp 4143 pc/h/In ee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S mi/h vtuber of lanes, N 3 sity, D pc/milin el of service, LOS F rverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. C-3 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c , Phone: Fax: , E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound From/To: 405 Fw. to Bear St. Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs Adjustments ' and Volume, V 5604 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1523 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling , Grade 0.00 0/0 Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 , Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2163 pc/h/In , Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 3 Free -flow speed: Measured , FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width.adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fl-C 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment,1ID 0.0 mi/h ' Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway , LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 2163 pc/hAn Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 57.5 mi/h Number of lanes, N 3 Density, D 36.0 pc/mVIn Level of service, LOS E Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. I C-4 ' ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c F tone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis 40 Analyst: Archie Lee Tan agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Mate Performed: 10/04/2006 Tthalysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound J%: 405 Fw. to Bear St. sd/Ticotlon: alysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments lume, V 10638 veh/h ak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 ak 15-min volume, v15 2891 v Trucks and buses 5 % creational vehicles 0 % train type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi and buses PCE, ET 2.5 SSucks creational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 avy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 fiver population factor, fp 1.00 w rate, vp 2486 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments one width 12.0 ft ht-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft nterchange density 0.50 interchange/mi &mber of lanes, N 5 We -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h .ane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h teral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h erchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h umber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h te-flow Urban Freeway and Performance rate, vp 2486 pc/h/In le -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Overage passenger -car speed, S mi/h rtuber of lanes, N 5 nsity, D pc/mi/In el of service, LOS F Iverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. C-5 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c I Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound From/To: 405 Fw, to Bear St. Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and.Adjustments Volume, V 5604 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1523 Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational Vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1310 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6,0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/ml Number of lanes, N 5 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, flD 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 1310 pc/h/In Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 5 Density, D 20.2 pc/mi/In Level of service, LOS C I i I u I� 11 I I I Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. C-6 ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c 1 tone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan or Company: Urban Crossroads Mate ency Performed: 10/04/2006 alysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound tr m/To: 405 Fw. to Bear St. sdiction: alysis Year: City Council Adopt LU Add Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments olume, V 10638 veh/h ak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 ak 15-min volume, V15 2891 Trucks and buses 5 % fiecreatlonal vehicles 0 % train type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi cks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 F.�'creational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 avy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 low rate, vp 2072 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Ine width 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft interchange density 0.50 Interchange/mi of lanes, N 6 �mber ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h erchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 ftteral mi/h tuber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway and Performance Measures tew rate, vp 2072 pc/h/In e-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 60.1 mi/h tuber of lanes, N 6 nsity, D 34.5 pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS D Iverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ' C-7 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound Fromffo: 405 Fw, to Bear St. Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopt LU Add Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 5604 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1523 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1091 pc/h/In Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 Interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 ml/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 1091 pc/h/In Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 6 Density, D 16.8 pc/milln Level of service, LOS B Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. iE HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c tone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan ency or Company: Urban Crossroads Is Performed: 10/04/2006 alysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound InomIT o: 405 Fw, to Bear St. nsdiction: alysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use ascription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments lume, V 3432 veh/h ak-hour factor. PHF 0.92 ak 15-min volume, v15 933 v Trucks and buses 5 % vehicles 0 % Wcreational rrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Sucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 creational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 eavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 low rate, vp 1337 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments ane width 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 Interchange density 0.50 16umber of lanes, N 3 ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 Stteral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 erchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 umber of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 ' Urban Freeway and Performance Measures ft interchange/mi mi/h mi/h mi/h m i/h mi/h mi/h w rate, vp 1337 pc/h/In lee -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mi/h 1ptuber of lanes, N 3 nsity, D 20.6 pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS C rverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. C-9 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c ' Phone: Fax: t E-mail: Operational Analysis , Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 ' Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound From/To: 405 Fw. to Bear St. Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments , Volume, V 9069 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 , Peak 15-min volume, v15 2464 V Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling ' Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 , Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3532 pclh/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 It , Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 3 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 66.0 milh Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 milli Interchange density adjustment, flD '0.0 ml/h , Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 milh Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 milh Urban Freeway t LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 3532 pclhlln , Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 milh Average passenger -car speed, S milh Number of lanes, N 3 Density, D pc/milln Level of service, LOS F Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed Is less than 55 mph. ' C-10 , IHOS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan �gency or Company: Urban Crossroads ate Performed: 10/04/2006 nalysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound tom/To: 405 Fw. to Bear St. risdiction: alysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Flow Inputs and Adjustments iume, V 3432 veh/h ak-hour factor, PHF J 0.92 ak 15-min volume, v15 933 v Trucks and buses 5 % ljecreational vehicles 0 % main type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi and buses PCE, ET 2.5 lucks ecreatlonal vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 eavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Mow rate, vp 1003 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments ne width 12.0 ft fight -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi umber of lanes, N 4 ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fl-W 0.0 mi/h Stferal clearance adjustment, f-C 0.0 milh erchange density adjustment, flD 0.0 mi/h umber of lanes adjustment, fN 1.5 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures low rate, vp 1003 pc/h/In ee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 milh tusbiter of lanes, N 4 ny, D 15.4 pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS B rverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. C-11 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c ' Phone: Fax: t E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 ' Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound From/To: 405 Fw, to Bear St. Jurisdiction: ' Analysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 9069 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 , Peak 15-min volume, v15 2464 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling , Grade 0.00 % Segmentlength 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 ' Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0,930 Driverpopulation factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2649 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft ' Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 4 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 milh Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 milh , Number of lanes adjustment, fN 1.5 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 milh Urban Freeway , LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 2649 pc/h/ln , Free -flow speed, FPS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S ml/h Number of lanes, N 4 Density, D pc/mVln , Level of service, LOS F Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ' C-12 ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c H hone: Fax: -mall: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan f encyor Comany:Urban Crossroads te Pefformed: 10/04/2006 elysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound tom/To: 405 Fw. to Bear St. risdiction: alysis Year: City Council Adopt LU Add Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 3432 veh/h factor, PHF 0.92 tak-hour ak 15-min volume, v15 933 v Trucks and buses 5 % creational vehicles 0 % train type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi and buses PCE, ET 2.5 rucks ecreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 eavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Sow rate, vp 668 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments ne width 12.0 ft Might -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi umber of lanes, N 6 Wee -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h dp�teral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h .terchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h lRumber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h ' Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measuw low rate, vp 668 pc/h/In ee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mi/h fvbyer of lanes, N 6 sit, D 10.3 pclmi/In el of service, LOS A fverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ' C-13 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c ' Phone: Fax: ' E-mail: Operational Analysis ' Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 ' Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound From/To: 405 Fw. to Bear St. Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopt LU Add Imp Description: Newport Beach General'Plan Update Flow Inputs Adjustments , and Volume, V 9069 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 ' Peak 15-min volume, v15 2464 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling , Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 , Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1766 pc/h/In , Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 Free -flow speed: Measured , FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mith Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway ' LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 1766 pclh/ln Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 muh Average passenger -car speed, S 64.2 mi/h Number of lanes, N 6 Density, D 27.5 pc/mi/In Level of service, LOS D Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ' C-14 , ' HC32000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c gone: Fax: 2-Mail: Operational Analysis analyst: Archie Lee Tan tte ncy orCompany:Urban Crossroads Performed: 10/04/2006 lysis Time Period: AM ieeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound om/T0: Bear St. to 55 Fw. ■risdiction: 4nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use ascription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments lume, V 12W veh/h ak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 eak 15-min volume, v15 3409 v Trucks and buses 5 % creational vehicles 0 % rrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi [ucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 creational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 leavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 population factor, fp 1.00 lofiver w rate, vp 4886 pc/h/In Inputs and Adjustments ne width 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi tuber of lanes, N 3 Bee -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h ne width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h teral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h terchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 mi/h speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Iee-flow Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures w rate, vp 4886 pc/h/In lee -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S mi/h tuber of lanes, N 3 nsity, D pc/mi/In Level of service, LOS F tverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. 1 C-15 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c ' , ?hone: Fax: -mall: Operational Analysis ' 4nalyst: Archie Lee Tan 4gency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 4nalysls Time Period: PM 'reeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound �rom/ro: Bear St, to 55 Fw, Jurisdiction: 4nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 6607 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 ' Peak 15-min volume, v15 1795 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling ' Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 , Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2573 pc/h/In ' Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft ' Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 3 Free -flow speed: Measured ' FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fl-W 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fl-C 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, flD 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway , LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 2573 pc/h/In , Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S mi/h Number of lanes, N 3 Density, D pc/mYln , Level of service, LOS F Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ' C-16 ' j IHCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: _Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Mate Performed: 10/04/2006 alysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound (imsd/iTcot! :on: Bear St. to 55 Fw. alysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 12544 veh/h beak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 beak 15-min volume, v15 3409 v Trucks and buses 5 % ecreational vehicles 0 % train type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi ta cks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 creational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 avy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 'ow rate, vp 2931 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Intenne width 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft change density 0.50 interchange/mi umber of lanes, N 5 ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h &teral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h terchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h tuber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures low rate, vp 2931 pc/h/In Bee -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Overage passenger -car speed, S mi/h fv.sity, ber of lanes, N 5 D pc/mi/In el of service, LOS F tverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. i C-17 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c i Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10104/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound From/To: Bear St. to 55 Fw. Jurisdiction: Analysts Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan,Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 6607 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 W95 Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0A30 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1544 pc/h/in Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6:0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 5 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 ml/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 ml/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 ml/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Me Flow rate, vp 1544 pc/h/In Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 ml/h Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mi/h Number of lanes,N 5 Density, D 23.8 pc/mi/In Level of service, LOS C Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. 1 C-18 H HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c one: Fax: mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan fncyorCompany:Urban Crossroads ePerformed: 10/04/2006 lysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound t /To: Bear St. to 55 Fw. Isdlction: lysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 12544 veh/h ak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 ak 15-min volume, v15 3409 v Trucks and buses 5 % creational vehicles 0 % main type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi k sand buses PCE, ET 2.5 tuc creational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 avy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 'ow rate, vp 1832 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments ane width 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi umber of lanes, N 8 ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, f-W 0.0 mi/h teral clearance adjustment, f-C 0.0 mi/h terchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h lRumber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measw low rate, vp 1832 pc/h/In ee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 63.6 mi/h tuber of lanes, N 8 nsity ,, D 28.8 pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS D fverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. 1 C-19 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c E Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound From/To: Bear St, to 55 Fw. Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopt LU Add Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 6607 vehlh Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1795 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 965 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 8 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 milh Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 milh Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway I I I I �J I and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 965 pc/h/In Free -flow speed, FFS 65:0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 milh Number of lanes, N 8 Density, D 14.8 pc/mi/ln Level of service, LOS B Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. C-20 ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c lone: Fax: -mail: Operational analyst: Archie Lee Tan ency or company: Urban Crossroads to Performed: 10/04/2006 nalysis Time Period: AM weeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound Mom/To: Bear St. to 55 Fw. risdiction: 4nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use ascription: Newport Beach General Plan Update _Flow Inputs and Adjustments lume, V 4046 veh/h ak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 ak 15-min volume, v15 1099 Prucks and buses 5 % vehicles 0 % Wcreational rrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi tcks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 creational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 population factor, fp 1.00 laver ow rate, vp 1576 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments ne width 12.0 ft I lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi of lanes, N 3 ember Be -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h ne width adjustment, fLW 0.0 milh teral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h terchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 mi/h -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway re and Performance Measures lw rate, vp 1576 pc/h/In lee -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 64.9 milh lumber of lanes, N 3 ensity, D 24.3 pc/mi/In evel of service, LOS C 11verall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. t C-21 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.10 ' 7hone: Fax: , -mail: Operational Analysis , analyst: Archie Lee Tan 4gency or Company: Urban Crossroads ' Date Performed: 10/04/2006 4nalysis Time Period: PM -reeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound =rom/To: Bear St. to 55 Fw. ' Jurisdiction: 4nalysis Year. City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Flow Inputs and Adjustments volume, V 10694 veh/h peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 , peak 15-min volume, v15 2906 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 ' Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0,930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4165 pc/h/In , Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft , Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 3 Free -flow speed: Measured , FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, tLC 0.0 mith , Interchange density adjustment, fiD 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mith Urban Freeway ' LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 4165 pc/h/ln , Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mith Average passenger -car speed, S mi/h Number of lanes, N 3 Density, D pc/mVIn t Level of service, LOS F Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. , C-22 ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mall: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Mate Performed: 10/04/2006 Enalysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound (om/To: Bear St. to 55 Fw. risdiction: alysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V rk -hour factor, PHF 15-min volume, v15 Trucks and buses ecreational vehicles train type: Grade Segment length rucks and buses PCE, ET ecreational vehicle PCE, ER eavy vehicle adjustment, fH Driver population factor, fp low rate, vp 4046 veh/h 0.92 1099 5 % 0 % Rolling 0.00 % 0.00 mi 2.5 2.0 V 0.930 1.00 946 pc/hlln Speed Inputs and Adjustment: ne width 12.0 ft fight -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft nterchange density 0.50 interchange/mi umber of lanes, N 5 ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 milh Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h l�aateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h aterchange umber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h ' Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measut now rate, vp 946 pc/h/In ee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h verage passenger -car speed, S 66.0 mi/h Jembar of lanes, N 5 nsityl D 14.6 pc/mi/in vel of service, LOS B fverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is les 1 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c I I Phone: Fax: , E-mail: Operational Analysis ' Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound From/To: Bear St, to 55 Fw. Jurisdiction: , Analysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments ' Volume, V 10694 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 ' Peak 15-min volume, v15 2906 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling ' Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 ' Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2499 pc/h/In ' Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft ' Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 5 Free -flow speed: Measured ' FFS or BFFS 65.0 mUh Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 milh Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mVh Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway t LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, Vp 2499 pc/h/In , Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S milh Number of lanes, N 5 Density, D pc/mi/In Level of service, LOS F Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. I C-24 ' IHCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c lJ one: Fax: mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Maency or Company: Urban Crossroads te Performed: 10/04/2006 alysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound (misd'iction: o: Bear St. to 55 Fw. alysis Year: City Council Adopt LU Add Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 4046 veh/h ak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 ak 15-min volume, v15 1099 Trucks and buses 5 % ecreationai vehicles 0 % rrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi and buses PCE, ET 2.5 eks ecres ional vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 eavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 low rate, vp 788 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments ne width 12.0 ft fight -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi umber of lanes, N 6 See -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h §tteral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h erchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h umber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h ' Urban Freeway LOS and' Performance Measu low rate, vp 788 pc/h/In ee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mi/h imber of lanes, N 6 nsity, D 12.1 pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS B fverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ' C-25 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c I I Phone: Fax: ' E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound From/To: Bear`St. to 55 Fw. Jurisdiction: ' Analysis Year: City Council Adopt LU Add Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments ' Volume, V 10694 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2906 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 , Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2083 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 Free -flow speed: Measured ' FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway , LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 2083 pc/h/In ' Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 59.9 mi/h Number of lanes, N 6 Density, D 34.8 pc/milln Level of service, LOS D Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ,1 C-26 , IHCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c I [one: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan ency or Company: Urban Crossroads to Performed: 10/04/2006 nalysis Time Period: AM eeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound Mom/To: 55 Fw. to Jamboree Rd. risdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use ascription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments lume, V 10638 veh/h ek-hour factor, PHF 0.92 ak 15-min volume, v15 2891 v Trucks and buses 5 % creational vehicles 0 % main type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi cks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 �u creational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 noer population factor, fp 1.00 w rate, vp 4143 pclh/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments lne width 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Bnumber of lanes, N 3 ee -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h ine width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h teral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h terchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 milh Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 mVh �ee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 milh Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures Fw rate, vp 4143 pc/h/In ee -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S mi/h ltuber of lanes, N 3 nslty, D pclmi/ln evel of service, LOS F Fverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. C-27 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c , Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound From/To: 55 Fw. to Jamboree Rd. Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update , Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 5604 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1523 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 ml Trucks and buses'PCE, ET 2.5 ' Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2183 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchangelmi Number of lanes, N 3 Free -flow speed: Measured ' FFS or BFFS 65.0 milh Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 milh Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 milh Interchange density adjustment, fiD 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 2183 pc/h/In , Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 ml/h Average passenger -car speed, S 57.5 milh Number of lanes, N 3 Density, D 38.0 pclmi/In Level of service, LOS E Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. , C-28 , HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c one: Fax: mall: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan ncy or Company: Urban Crossroads ■ate Performed: 10/04/2006 analysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound frimsdicofion: /To:55 Fw. to Jamboree Rd. alysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V beak -hour factor, PHF sk 15-min volume, v15 Trucks and buses ecreational vehicles train type: Grade Segment length ucks and buses PCE, ET ecreational vehicle PCE, ER eavy vehicle adjustment, fHV Driver population factor, fp low rate, vp 10638 veh/h 0.92 2891 v 5 % 0 % Rolling 0.00 % 0.00 mi 2.5 2.0 0.930 1.00 2486 pc/h/In ne width 12.0 Might -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 interchange density 0.50 umber of lanes, N 5 Wee -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 &feral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 .terchange density adjustment, flD 0.0 tuber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 ' Urban Freeway Inputs and Adjustments ft interchange/mi m i/h mi/h mi/h mi/h mi/h mi/h LOS and Performance Measures now rate, vp 2486 pc/h/In ee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h verage passenger -car speed, S mi/h unbar of lanes, N 5 sity, D pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS F fverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ' C-29 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c 11 I Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis ' Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10104/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound From/To: 55 Fw. to Jamboree Rd. Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments ' Volume, V 5604 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 ' Peak 15-min volume, v15 1523 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 , Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1310 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 5 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 milh Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, flD 0.0 mUh Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 milh Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 1310 pc/h/In Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h ' Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 5 Density, D 20.2 pc/mi/in Level of service, LOS C Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ' C-30 ', ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c I one: Fax: mail: Operational Analysis talyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads frele Performed: 10/04/2006alysisTime Period: AM eway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound iJM otTo: 55 Fw. to Jamboree Rd. risdiction: alysis Year: City Council Adopt LU Add Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments IF Volume, V 10638 veh/h ak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 ak 15-min volume, v15 2891 v ucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Wrraln type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi rucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 ecreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 avy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 iow rate, vp 2072 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Ine width 12.0 ft fight -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft terchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 ee-flow speed: Measured lFFS or BFFS 66.0 mi/h ane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h .Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h terchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h umber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h ' Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures low rate, vp 2072 pc/h/In ee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h erage passenger -car speed, S 60.1 mi/h Number of lanes, N 6 &nsity, D 34.5 pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS D Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. I C-31 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c Phone: Fax: l E-mail: Operational Analysis ' Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound FromtTo: 55 Fw. to Jamboree Rd. Jurisdiction: ' Analysis Year: City Council Adopt LU Add Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 5604 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1523 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 , Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1091 pc/h/in ' Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft ' Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fl-W 0.0 milh Lateral clearance adjustment, f-C 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h ' Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 1091 pc/h/in Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 6 Density, D 16.8 pc/mi/In Level of service, LOS B Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. , C-32 J HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c [one: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analyst: Archie Lee Tan ency or Company: Urban Crossroads to Performed: 10/04/2006 alysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound 1nom/To: 55 Fw. to Jamboree Rd. risdiction: alysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use n-scription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments lume, V 3432 vehlh ak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 ak 15-min volume, v15 933 v Trucks and buses 5 % creational vehicles 0 % rrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Sucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 creational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 eavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 population factor, fp 1.00 iriver ow rate, vp 1337 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Ine width 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 Interchange density 0.50 Number of lanes, N 3 ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 Lane width adjustment, f-W 0.0 feral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 terchange density adjustment, flD 0.0 Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 iee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 Urban Freeway and Performance Measures ft interchangelmi mi/h mi/h milh milh mi/h mi/h w rate, vp 1337 pc/h/In lee -flow speed, FFS 65.0 milh Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 milh tuber of lanes, N 3 nsity, D 20.6 pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS C Ifverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. I C-33 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c , Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound From/To: 55 Fw. to Jamboree Rd. Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Adjustments Flow Inputs and Volume, V 9069 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2464 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling ' Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3532 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 3 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 ml/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 ml/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 ml/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and.Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 3532 pc/h/in Free -flow speed, FPS 65.0 ml/h Average passenger -car speed, S ml/h Number of lanes, N 3 Density, D pc/mi/ln Level of service, LOS F Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. I C-34 I HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c one: Fax: mail: Operational Analysis nalyst: Archie Lee Tan Mgency or Company: Urban Crossroads ate Performed: 10/04/2006 11nalysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound Zrom/To: 55 Fw. to Jamboree Rd. Analysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 3432 veh/h beak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Teak 15-min volume, v15 933 v rucks and buses 5 % , Recreational vehicles 0 % rrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0,00 mi ucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 ecreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 eavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Iow rate, vp 802 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Sne width 12.0 ft ight-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft terchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 5 ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane wldth adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Mtteral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h erchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h tuber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures w rate, vp 802 pc/h/in ee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h verage passenger -car speed, S 65.0 milh Number of lanes, N 5 nsity, D 12.3 pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS B tverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. 1 C-35 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysts Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-731Southbound From(To: 55 Fw. to Jamboree Rd. Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments , Volume, V 9069 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2464 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2119 pc/h/In , Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0:50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 5 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, flD 0.0 ml/h , Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway , LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 2119 pc/h/in Free-flbw speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 59.1 mi/h Number of lanes, N 5 Density, D 35.9 pc/mi/In Level of service, LOS E Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. I C-36 I IHCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c one: Fax: mail: Operational Analysis nalyst: Archie Lee Tan Mgency or Company: Urban Crossroads ate Performed: 10/04/2006 Wnalysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound .From/To: 55 Fw. to Jamboree Rd. Xnalysis Year: City Council Adopt LU Add Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 3432 veh/h Weak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 eak 15-min volume, v15 933 v Trucks and buses 5 % ecreationai vehicles 0 % train type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi rucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 ecreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 eavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Iow rate, vp 668 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments &ne width 12.0 ft night -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft terchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 see -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h teral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h terchange density adjustment, flD 0.0 mi/h umber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h 1 Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures Sow rate, vp 668 pc/h/In ee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h verage passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 6 nsity, D 10.3 pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS A tverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ' C-37 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c ' t Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis ' Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound From/To: 55 Fw, to Jamboree Rd. Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopt LU Add Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 9069 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2464 v , Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1766 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h , Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 milh Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 milh Urban Freeway LOS Performance Measures and Flow rate, vp 1766 pc/h/In Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h , Average passenger -car speed, S 64.2 mi/h Number of lanes, N 6 Density, D 27.5 pc/mt/In Level of service, LOS D Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. C-38 11 ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c I ,hone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan t ency or Company: Urban Crossroads te Performed: 10/04/2006 alysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound m/To:Jamboree to Bonita Canyon isdictlon:�or alysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use ascription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments V 7621 veh/h �olume, eak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 eak 15-min volume, v16 2071 v Trucks and buses 5 % vehicles 0 % �ecreational errain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi rucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 teecreational avy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 * river population factor, fp 1.00 low rate, vp i 2968 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments the width 12.0 ft fight -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi umber of lanes, N 3 ree-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h n�aateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h aterchange Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 mi/h ree-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures w rate, vp 2968 pc/h/In lee -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S mi/h umbyer of lanes, N 3 ensit ,, D pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS F rverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ' C-39 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c ' ' Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis , Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound From/To: Jamboree to Bonita Canyon Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Adjustments , Inputs and Volume, V 4015 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1091 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0,00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1564 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 3 Free -flow speed: Measured , FFS or BFFS 65,0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0,0 mdh Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 milh Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 1564 pc/hAn , Free -flow speed, FFS 66.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 64.9 mi/h Number of lanes, N 3 Density, D 24.1 pc/ml/in Level of service, LOS C Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. C-40 , IHCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Operational Analysis nalyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads la te Performed: 10104/2006 nalysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound ,$rom/To: Jamboree to Bonita Canyon Analysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 7621 veh/h eak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 Mask 15-min volume, v15 2071 v rucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % brain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi ucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 ecreationai vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 eavehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 ,Now rate, vp 1781 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments ne width 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 tit ft erchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 5 e -flow speed: Measured flo Is FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h ,Laferal clearance adjustment, f-C 0.0 mi/h terchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h umber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 milh Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway 1 r)R and Perf ormance Measures Sow rate, vp 1781 pc/h/In iffee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 milh verage passenger -car speed, S 64.1 mi/h Number of lanes, N 5 tnsity, D 27.8 pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS D tverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. I C-41 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c u Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst; Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound From/To: Jamboree to Bonita Canyon Jurisdiction; Analysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 4015 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1091 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 938 pc/h/In Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 5 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 milh Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mt/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 938 pc/h/In Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 ml/h Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 5 Density, D 14.4 pc/mUln Level of service, LOS B Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. I l 1 I F1 I C-42 ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c one: Fax: mall: _Operational Ana n�C alyst: Archie Lee Tan (ancy orCompany: Urban Crossroads oPerformed.10/04/2006 lysisTimePeriod: AM eway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound ,From/To: Jamboree to Bonita Canyon Analysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 2459 veh/h Wak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 15-min volume, v15 668 v TMeek rucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % �rrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Ducks ecreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 eavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Ijow rate, vp 958 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments width 12.0 ft t,gnhe, -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft erchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 3 ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h erchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 §tteral mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway InR and Perf ormance Measures now rate, vp 958 pc/h/In ee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 ml/h Number of lanes, N 3 tensity, D 14.7 pc/mi/In vei of service, LOS B (verall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. 1 C-43 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c Phone: Fax: , E-mail: Operational Analysis ' Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 , Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound From/To: Jamboree to Bonita Canyon Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted.Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 6497 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 , Peak 15-min volume, v15 1765 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling ' Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 ' Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2531 pc/h/ln Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft , Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 3 Free -flow speed: Measured ' FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 ml/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mUh , Number of lanes adjustment, IN 3.0 milh Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway ' LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 2631 pc/hAn Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S mi/h Number of lanes, N 3 Density, D pc/milln Level of service, LOS F Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. 1 C-44 1 ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: Operational Analysis nalyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads date Performed: 10/04/2006 analysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound ,grom/To: Jamboree to Bonita Canyon Analysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 2459 veh/h beak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Seek 15-min volume, v15 668 v rucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Isrrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi ckand buses PCE, ET 2.5 creationai vehicle PCE, ER tus 2.0 alvehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 flow rate, vp 575 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments one width 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft terchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 5 ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h ,Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h §terchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 milh number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h ' Urban Freeway LOS and Performance now rate, vp 575 pc/h/In e-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h erage passenger -car speed, S 65.0 milh Number of lanes, N 5 nsity, D 8.8 pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS A (verall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ' C-45 HCS20001 Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c ' Phone: Fax: , E-mail: Operational Analysis , Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban -Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 ' Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound FromlTo: Jamboree to Bonita Canyon Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments , Volume, V 6497 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1765 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling , Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 ' Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1518 pc/h/In , Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft , Interchange density 0.50 interchange/ml Number of lanes, N 5 Free -flow speed: Measured ' FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 milh Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, flD 0.0 milh Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway ' LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 1518 pc/h/In Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h ' Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 milh Number of lanes, N 5 Density, D 23.4 pc/mVIn Level of service, LOS C Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph, i C-46 , ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c LJ [one: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Maency or Company: Urban Crossroads te Performed: 10/04/2006 alysis Time Period: AM reeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound tTo: Bonita Canyon to Newport Coast nsdlction: I alysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use t scription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments lume, V 10797 veh/h ak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 ak 15-min volume, v15 2934 v Trucks and buses 5 % bcreational vehicles 0 % rain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi ucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 creational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 eavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 ,ow rate, vp 3154 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments line width 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Jiumber of lanes, N 4 itee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, f -W 0.0 mi/h teral clearance adjustment, f -C 0.0 milh terchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 milh Number of lanes adjustment, fN 1.5 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures w rate, vp 3154 pc/h/In lee -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S mi/h t bityer of lanes, N 4 n', D pc/mi/ln vel of service, LOS F rverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ' C-47 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c ' , Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis , Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company., 'Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 ' Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound From/To: Bonita Canyon to Newport Coast Jurisdiction: ' Analysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Adjustments , Flow Inputs and Volume, V 5687 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 , Peak 15-min volume, v15 1545 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling 1 Grade 0.00 0/0 Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 ' Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1661 pclh/ln ' Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 It Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 4 Free -flow speed: Measured ' FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, f -W 0.0 mith Lateral clearance adjustment, f-C 0.0 milh Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h ' Number of lanes adjustment, IN 1.5 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway , LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 1661 pc/h/In , Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 milh Average passenger -car speed, S 64.7 mi/h Number of lanes, N 4 Density, D 26.7 pc/mi/in ' Level of service, LOS C Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ' C-48 ' ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mall: Operational Analysis nalyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Mate Performed: 10/04/2006 nalysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound .Lrom/To: Bonita Canyon to Newport Coast analysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 10797 veh/h SSeak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 Beak 15-min volume, v15 2934 v rucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % §errain type: Roiling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi rrucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 ecreational vehicle PCE,'ER 2.0 eavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Iow rate, vp 2103 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments (ne width 12.0 ft fight -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft terchange density 0.60 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 Wee -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h an width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Mtteral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h erchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mVh umber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h ' Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures Now rate, vp 2103 pc/h/In ee-flow speed, FFS 66.0 mi/h erage passenger -car speed, S 59.5 mi/h Number of lanes, N 6 nsity, D 35.4 pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS E (verail results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ' C-49 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c 11 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound From/To: Bonita Canyon to Newport Coast Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 5687 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1545 Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Roiling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 ml Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fH1V 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1108 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 It Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 milh Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 milh Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 1108 pc/h/In Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 milh Average passenger-carspeed, S 65.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 6 Density, D 17.0 pc/milin Level of service, LOS B Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. C L i C-50 I� ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: Operational Analysis nalyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads ate Pertormed: 10/04/2006 nalysis Time Period: AM reeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound .Erom/To: Bonita Canyon to Newport Coast Inalysis Year: City Council Adopt LU Add Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 10797 veh/h factor, PHF 0.92 �eak-hour eak 15-min volume, v15 2934 v rucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % type: Rolling 'errain Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi and buses PCE, ET 2.5 �rucks ecreat(onal vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 eavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 slow rate, vp 1802 pclh/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments width 12.0 ft rien ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft erchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 7 speed: Measured lree-flow FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h ane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h lateral terchange density adjustment, flD 0.0 mi/h umber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h ' Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures WNow rate, vp 1802 pc/h/In ee -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 63.9 milh Number of lanes, N 7 ensity, D 28.2 pc/mi/In Wei of service, LOS D 'Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. 1 C-51 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analyst: Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound From/To: Bonita Canyon to Newport Coast Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopt LU Add Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 5667 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1545 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 949 po/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12:0 It Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0,50 interchange/ml Number of lanes, N .7 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mt/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measui Flow rate, vp 949 pc/h/In Free -flow -speed, FFS 65.0 milh Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 7 Density, D 14.6 po/milln Level of service, LOS B Overall results are not computed when free -Flow speed is less than 55 mph. C-52 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c tone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan ency or Company: Urban Crossroads to Performed: 10/04/2006 alysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound om/To: Bonita Canyon to Newport Coast risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use escrlption: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments volume, V 3483 veh/h ak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 ak 15-min volume, v15 946 v Trucks and buses 5 % fiecreational vehicles 0 % main type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Sucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 creational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 eavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 'ow rate, vp 1017 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments ne width 12.0 ft fight -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 Interchange/mi mber of lanes, N 4 ee-flow speed: Measured 6i FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Steral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h terchange density adjustment, flD 0.0 mi/h umber of lanes adjustment, fN 1.5 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures w rate, vp 1017 pc/h/In lee -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mi/h tuber of lanes, N 4 nsity, D 15.6 pclmi/In vel of service, LOS B Fverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. ' C-53 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c 'hone: Fax: -mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/06/2006 4nalysis Time Period: PM °reeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound rom/To: Bonita Canyon to Newport Coast Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments volume, V 9205 veh/h Deak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2501 V Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2689 pc/hlin Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 It Interchange density 0.50 Interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 4 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mUh Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 milh Number of lanes adjustment, IN 1.5 mUh Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 2689 pc/hlln Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mUh Average passenger -car speed, S mi/h Number of lanes, N 4 Density, D polmilln Level of service, LOS F Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. C-54 ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c one: Fax: mail: _Operational Analysis talyst: Archie Lee Tan �A ency or Company: Urban Crossroads te Performed: 10/04/2006 alysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound ,grom/To: Bonita Canyon to Newport Coast Eralysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V leak -hour factor, PHF ak 15-min volume, v15 rucks and buses Recreational vehicles rrain type: Grade Segment length cks nd buses PCE, ET Jcreat�iional vehicle PCE, ER avy vehicle adjustment, fHV Driver population factor, fp low rate, vp 3483 veh/h 0.92 946 v 5 % 0 % Rolling 0.00 % 0.00 mi 2.5 2.0 0.930 1.00 678 pc/h/In Inputs and Adjustments lone width 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft nterchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h 4terai erchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h tuber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures w rate, vp 678 pc/h/In See -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h verage passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mi/h Vumber of lanes, N 6 Jnsity, D 10.4 pc/mi/in vel of service, LOS A tverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. 1 C-55 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c ' Phone: Fax: , E-mail: Operational Analysis ' Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/6612006 ' Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound From/To: Bonita Canyon to Newport Coast Jurisdiction: ' Analysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments ' Volume, V 9205 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2501 v , Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling ' Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 ' Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV b.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1793 pc/hAn Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft ' Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 Free -flow speed: Measured ' FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 ml/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h , Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mllh Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway ' LOS and Performance Measures =low rate, vp 1793 pc/h/In =ree-flow speed, FFS 65.0 m[/h ' Overage passenger -car speed, S 64.0 milh Number of lanes, N 6 Density, D 28.0 pc/mi/in ' -eve[ of service, LOS D Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. , C-56 ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c [one: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis 4nalyst: Archie Lee Tan tency or Company: Urban Crossroads te Performed: 10/04/2006 ���!!! alysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound Iom/Newport Coast to Toll Plaza rlsdiction:alysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update 9 Flow Inputs and Adjustments 3 veh/h 0.92 2740 lume, V 1008 5 0 Rolling 0.00 0.00 mi Speed Inputs and Adjustments Kne width 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi iWmber of lanes, N 3 ee-flow speed! Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 Stteral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 erchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 umber of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 Urban Freeway milh mil rc n rc mi/h and Performanc e w rate, vp 3927 pc/h/In e-flow speed, FFS 65.0 milh Average passenger -car speed, S m Jv mber of lanes, N 3 nsi, D pc/milin el of service, LOS F I verall results are not computed when free -flow spE HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Dlrection: SR-73/Northbound From/To: Newport Coast to Toll Plaza Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 5311 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1443 Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2:5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2069 pclh/in Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 R Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes. N 3 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 ml/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 milh Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway H 1 1 H 1 LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 2069 pc/h/In Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 milh Average passenger -car speed, S 60.2 mi/h Number -of lanes, N 3 Density, D 34.4 pc/milin Level of service, LOS D C Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. C-58 ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c one: Fax: mail: Operational Analysis nalys}C t: Archie Lee Tan �ency or Company: Urban Crossroads te Performed: 10/04/2006 alysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound t To: Newport Coast to Toll Plaza IsdIction: alysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 10083 veh/h factor, PHF 0.92 ak 15-min volume, v15 1pak-hour 2740 v rucks and buses 5 % vehicles 0 % Icreational rrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi nd buses PCE, ET 2.5 tucks creataional vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 avy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 fjow rate, vp 2356 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments One width 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft erchange density 0.50 interchange/mi umber of lanes, N 5 ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Wteral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 milh erchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h tuber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h ' Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures now rate, vp 2356 pc/h/In ee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h verage passenger -car speed, S mi/h mber of lanes, N 5 nsity, D pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS F tverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. t M HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysts Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 ,Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound From/To: Newport Coast to Toll Plaza Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 5311 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1443 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1241 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 ml/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 ml/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measw Flow rate, vp 1241 pc/h/In Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 5 Density, D 19.1 pc/mi/In Level of service, LOS C Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. I J 1 I I C-60 IHCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c one: Fax: mail: � Operational Analysis nalys�C t: Archie Lee Tan aency or Company: Urban Crossroads te Performed: 10/04/2006 alysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound &om/To: Newport Coast to Toll Plaza Rnalysis Year: City Council Adopt LU Add Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 10083 veh/h ak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 ak 15-min volume, v15 2740 v rucks and buses 5 % fecreational vehicles 0 % train type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi tucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 ecreationaI vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 ea vy veh(cie adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Iow rate, vp 1964 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments F newidth 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft erchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, f -W 0.0 mi/h �teral clearance adjustment, f -C 0.0 mi/h terchange density adjustment, flD 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h ' Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures Mow rate, vp 1964 pc/h/In ee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h verage passenger -car speed, S 62.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 6 tnsity, D 31.7 pc/ml/In vel of service, LOS D fverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. C-61 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Northbound From/To: Newport Coast to Toll Plaza Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopt LU Add Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 5311 vehlh Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1443 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 ml, Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1034 path/in Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 Interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS"or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 010 milh Lateral clearance adjustment, f -C 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, IN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mllh Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Me Flow rate, vp 1034 pc/hAn Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 ml/h Number of lanes, N 6 Density, D 15.9 pc/mUln Level of service, LOS B Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. 11 I I 1I I 1 C-62 I HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1 c II u [one: Fax: mail: Operational Analysis 4nalyst: Archie Lee Tan Vency or Company: Urban Crossroads ia Performed: 10/04/2006 alysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound : Newport Coast to Toll Plaza J0r1MS1dqJct: alysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use ascription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments lume, V 3252 veh/h ak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 ; ak 15-min volume, v15 884 v Trucks and buses 5 % creational vehicles 0 % rrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi and buses PCE, ET 2.5 Sucks creational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 eavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 �tCever population factor, fp 1.00 rate, vp 1267 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments lne width 12.0 ft ght-shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi of lanes, N 3 &mber ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, f-W 0.0 mi/h clearance adjustment, fl-C 0.0 mi/h erchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 ltteral mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 mi/h speed, FFS 65.0 milh �ee-flow Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures low rate, vp 1267 pc/h/In ee-flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mVh timber of lanes, N 3 nsity, D 19.5 pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS C Iverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. C-63 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c t phone: Fax: mall: Operational Analysis , knalyst: Archie Lee Tan kgency or Company. Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 knalysis Time Period: PM creeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound =rom/To: Newport Coast to Toll Plaza Jurisdiction: knalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 8596 veh/h Deak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 , Deak 15-min volume, v15 2336 v Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling , Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 ' Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 -leavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 =low rate, vp 3348 pc/h/ln Speed Inputs and Adjustments -ahe width 12:0 ft ' Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, IN 3 Free -flow speed: Measured t' FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h :ane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mVh Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h ' Number of lanes adjustment, fN 3.0 mI/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 ml/h Urban Freeway , LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 3348 pc/h/In , Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Overage passenger -car speed, S mi/h Number of lanes, N 3 Density, D pc/mi/ln ' Level of service, LOS F Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph, 11 C-64 ' ' HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c one: Fax: mail: Operational Analysis nalyst: Archie Lee Tan ency or Company: Urban Crossroads ate Performed: 10/04/2006 alysis Time Period: AM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound /To: Newport Coast to Toll Plaza rlsdlction: alysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 3252 veh/h Seek -hour factor, PHF 0.92 TSeek 15-min volume, v15 884 v rucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % le main type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi ucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 ecreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 eavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Iow rate, vp 633 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments fgn.et width12.0 ft -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft erchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 ee-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 milh Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 milh Mtteral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 milh erchange density adjustment, flD 0.0 milh umber of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures Mow rate, vp 633 pc/h/In Wee -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h verage passenger -car speed, S 65.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 6 tnsity, D 9.7 pc/mi/In vel of service, LOS A tverall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. I C-65 HCS2000: Basic Freeway Segments Release 4.1c Phone: Fax: E-mail: Operational Analysis Analyst: Archie Lee Tan Agency or Company: Urban Crossroads Date Performed: 10/04/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Freeway/Direction: SR-73/Southbound From/To: Newport Coast to Toll Plaza Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Flow Inputs and Adjustments Volume, V 8596 veh/h Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2336 Trucks and buses 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Grade 0.00 % Segment length 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2,5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1674 pc/h/In Speed Inputs and Adjustments Lane width 12.0 ft Right -shoulder lateral clearance 6.0 ft Interchange density 0.50 interchange/mi Number of lanes, N 6 Free -flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 65.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW 0.0 mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC 0.0 mi/h Interchange density adjustment, fID 0.0 mi/h Number of lanes adjustment, fN 0.0 ml/h Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mVh Urban Freeway LOS and Performance Measures Flow rate, vp 1674 pc/h/In Free -flow speed, FFS 65.0 mi/h Average passenger -car speed, S 64.7 mi/h Number of lanes, N 6 Density, D 25:9 pc/mi/In Level of service, LOS C Overall results are not computed when free -flow speed is less than 55 mph. C-66 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 L d 1 1 I � 1 i 1 ATTACHMENT D City Council Adopted Land Use Scenario Freeway Ramp Analysis 1 IHCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c Phone: Fax: 1-mail: Diverge Analysis nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 nalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound nction: Bristol St. urisdiction: lnalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update of analysis )er of lanes in freeway How speed on freeway ie on freeway Data Diverge 5 65.0 mph 10638 vph IOff Ramp Data ide of freeway Right umber of lanes in ramp 1 Free -Flow speed on ramp 45.0 mph olume on ramp 2310 vph lVength of first accel/decel lane 0 ft Length of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data �oes adjacent ramp exist? olume on adjacent ramp tosition of adjacent ramp ype of adjacent ramp istance to adjacent ramp Inction Components olume, V (vph) '1 (if one exists) Yes 480 vph Upstream On 1720 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 10638 2310 480 D-3 Adjacent vph Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2891 628 130 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE,, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 12430 2699 561 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 5858 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 9944 9400 Yes Fi F v 5858 4400 Yes 12 v = v - v 7245 9400 No FO F R v 2699 2100 Yes R Level of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 54.6 pc/mi/in R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence F Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.541 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 53 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 67.2 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 57.7 mph D-4 �I 1 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis gnalyst: Archie Tan gency/co.. Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Wnalysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: Bristol St. ,jurisdiction: ,nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update IFreeway Data Sype of analysis Diverge Number of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �olume on freeway 5604 vph Off Ramp Da ide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 ree-Flow speed on ramp 45.0 mph olume on ramp 910 vph of first accel/decel lane 0 ft �ength ength of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp 'hoes adjacent ramp exist? Yes olume on adjacent ramp 850 osition of adjacent ramp Upstream ype of adjacent ramp On istance to adjacent ramp 1720 Data (if one exists) vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions unction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Iolume, V (vph) Ramp 5604 910 850 vph D-5 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1523 247 231 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 6548 1063 993 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3026 pc/h 12 R F R FD v =v Fi F v 12 v =v-v FO F R v R Actual Maximum 5566 9400 3026 4400 4503 9400 1063 2100 Capacity Checks LOS F? No No No No Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 30.3 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.394 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 56 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 70.3 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.7 mph I LJ I 1I 11 Ll II 11 r -1 II it lJ D-6 t HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis gnalyst: Archie Tan gencyiuo.. Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10105/2006 Analysis time period: AM freeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound 'Junction: Bristol St. rlsdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update llype of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free -flow speed on freeway Iolume on freeway tide of freeway Number of lanes in ramp �ree-Flow speed on ramp olume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Data Diverge 5 65.0 mph 8865 vph Off Ramp Data Right 2 45.0 2310 ingth of second accel/decel lane 280 0 mph vph ft ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists)_ toes adjacent ramp exist? No Volume on adjacent ramp vph kpe sition of adjacent ramp of adjacent ramp iistance to adjacent ramp ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions tnction Components to lume, V (vph) Freeway Ramp Ramp 8865 2310 Adjacent vph D-7 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2409 628 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 10359 2699 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.260 Using Equation 0 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 4152 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 8288 9400 No Fi F v 4152 4400 No 12 v = v - V 5589 9400 No FO F R v 2699 4100 No R Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 34.9 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D peed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.541 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 53 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 67.1 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 58.9 mph 1 r r r i r [1 r r [1 D-8 r ' HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis �nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Analysis time period: PM reeway/dirortravel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: Bristol St. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Type of analysis umber of lanes in freeway Free -flow speed on freeway Iolume on freeway Diverge 5 65.0 mph 4670 vph Off Ramp Data tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 2 �ree-Flow speed on ramp 45.0 mph olume on ramp 910 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 280 ft length of second accel/decel lane 0 ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists oes adjacent ramp exist? No (01S�11;jon a on adjacent ramp vph of adjacent ramp pe of adjacent ramp istance to adjacent ramp ft unction Components iolume, V (vph) Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 4670 910 D-9 Adjacent vph Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1269 247 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 5457 1063 pcph, v Estimation of'V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.260 Using Equation 0 FD v = V + (v - v ) P = 2064 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 4912 9400 No Fi F v 2064 4400 No 12 v = v - v 3849 9400 No FO F R v 1063 4100 No R Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 17.0 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.394 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 56 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 69.7 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 63.2 mph I I I L I r_ I 1 I D-10 1 I HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis �nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Fnalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound unction: Bristol St. idurisdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Data Type of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �olume on freeway 3432 vph Off Ramp Data fide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 2 ree-Flow speed on ramp 45.0 mph olume on ramp 1380 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 2725 ft length of second accei/decel lane 0 ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) toes adjacent ramp exist? Yes #olume on adjacent ramp 810 vph osition of adjacent ramp Downstream ype of adjacent ramp Off !stance to adjacent ramp 2610 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions function Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Iolume, V (vph) 3432 1380 810 vph D-11 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 933 375 220 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % ' Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % , Length 0,00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0,930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4010 1612 946 pcph , Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ = 0.260 Using Equation 0 'P FD v =v +(v-v)P = 2131 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 3609 9400 No Fi F , v 2131 4400 No 12 1 v = v - v 1997 9400 No FO F R v 1612 4100 No ' R Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = -26.5 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence A Speed Estimation ' Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.443 S , Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 55 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 71.3 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.5 mph D-12 , ' HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c t,one: Fax: _ mail: Diverge Analysis alyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 alysis time period: PM eeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound unction: Bristol St. risdction: Ienalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use scription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Freeway pe of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Molume on freeway 9069 vph Off Ramp Data tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 2 speed on ramp 45.0 mph gee-Flow olume on ramp 680 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 2725 ft � ength of second accel/decel lane 0 ft ■■ Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Noes adjacent ramp exist? Yes oluma on adjacent ramp 850 vph osition of adjacent ramp Downstream ype of adjacent ramp Off Qistance to adjacent ramp 2610 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions tnction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Iolume, V (vph) 9069 680 850 vph D-13 Deak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2464 185 231 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 10597 795 993 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.260 Using Equation 0 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 2793 pc/h 12 R F R FD Actual Maximum v = v 8478 9400 Fi F v 2793 4400 12 v = v - v 7683 9400 FO F R v 795 4100 R Capacity Checks LOS F? No No No No Level of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = -20.8 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence A Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.370 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 57 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 64.1 mph 0 Space, mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.4 mph D-14 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analys �nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Fnalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound unction: Jamboree Rd. rlsdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use ascription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Data of analysis Merge Type umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �olume on freeway 7621 vph On Ramp C tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 �ree-flow speed on ramp 15.0 mph olume on ramp 480 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 120 ft length of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) goes adjacent ramp exist? Yes olume on adjacent Ramp 2310 vph osition of adjacent Ramp Downstream ype of adjacent Ramp Off !stance to adjacent Ramp 1720 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions '..ruction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Iolume, V (vph) 7621 480 2310 vph D-15 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2071 130 628 Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 8905 561 2699 pcph Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.237 Using Equation 4 FM. v = v (P ) = 1517 pc/h 12 F FM v �I 1 1 Capacity Checks 1 Actual Maximum LOS F? v 6966 9400 No ' FO v 2078 4600 No R12 , Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 20.7 pc/milin R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C , Speed Estimation , Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.349 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 57.0 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 57.6 mph 0 ' Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 57.4 mph D-16 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis fa alyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads te performed: 10/05/2006 alysis time period: PM Weeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound nction: Jamboree Rd. risdiction: Knalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Freeway Data pe of analysis Merge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Iolume on freeway 4015 vph On tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 �ree-flow speed on ramp 15.0 olume on ramp 850 Length of first accel/decel lane 120 length of second accel/decel lane Ramp Data mph vph ft ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) goes adjacent ramp exist? Yes 0 oluma on adjacent Ramp 910 vph osition of adjacent Ramp Downstream ype of adjacent Ramp Off !stance to adjacent Ramp 1720 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions ' mction Components Iolume, V (vph) Freeway Ramp Ramp 4015 850 910 D-17 Adjacent vph Peak -hour factor, PH 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1091 231 247 Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE,'ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4691 993 1063 pcph Estimation of V12 Merge L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.183 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 669 pc/h 12 F FM Actual Maximum v 4652 9400 FO v 1662 4600 R12 Capacity Checks LOS F? No No Level of Service Determination (if not F) u Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 17.2 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence• B Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.338 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S S = 57.2 mph = 61.4 mph = 59.9 mph I 1 L I I, I D-18 I I HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis Igalyst:Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Inalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: Jamboree Rd. jurisdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Data ffype of analysis Merge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Iolume on freeway 3432 vph On Ramp Data 191de of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 ree-flow speed on ramp 40.0 mph olume on ramp 610 vph �ength of first accel/decel lane 1700 ft ength of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) toes adjacent ramp exist? Yes 0 oluma on adjacent Ramp 2190 vph osition of adjacent Ramp Downstream ype of adjacent Ramp Off !stance to adjacent Ramp 1700 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions 'unction Components Iolume, V (vph) Freeway Ramp Ramp 3432 610 2190 D-19 Adjacent vph Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 933 166 595 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4010 713 2559 pcph Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.603 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 1885 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks , Actual Maximum LOS F? v 3841 9400 No FO v 2598 4600 No R12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 14.8 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.237 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 59.5 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 64.6 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.1 mph D-20 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c t,one: Fax: _ mail: Merge Analysis qw— alyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 iralysis time period: PM eeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: Jamboree Rd. risdiction: Walysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data pe of analysis Merge Number of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph flume on freeway 9069 vph On Ramp Data fide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 �ree-flow speed on ramp 40.0 mph olume on ramp 1610 vph ngth of first accel/decel lane 1700 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) goes adjacent ramp exist? Yes 0 olumI on adjacent Ramp 2230 vph osition of adjacent Ramp Downstream ype of adjacent Ramp Off !stance to adjacent Ramp 1700 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Uction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Iolume, V (vph) 9069 1610 2230 vph D-21 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2464 437 606 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 10597 1881 2606 pcph Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.457 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 3697 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks , Actual Maximum LOS F? v 9978 9400 Yes FO v 5578 4600 Yes R12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 37.5 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence F Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M =1.217 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 37.0 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S 58.9 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 44.3 mph D-22 ' HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c l l hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis �nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 gnalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: Jamboree Rd. nsdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Data llype of analysis Merge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �olume on freeway 2860 vph On Ramp Data tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 Wree-flow speed on ramp 40.0 mph olume on ramp 610 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 1600 ft length of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp lRoes adjacent ramp exist? No a on adjacent Ramp 000S,�,,Iion of adjacent Ramp ype of adjacent Ramp istance to adjacent Ramp Uction Components Iolume, V (vph) Data (if one exists) vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 2860 610 Adjacent vph D-23 'eak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 3eak 15-min volume, v15 777 166 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % retrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 -leavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 =low rate, vp 3342 713 pcph v Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.575 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 1498 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 3320 9400 No FO v 2211 4600 No R12 Level of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 12.4 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.229 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 59.7 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 64.8 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.3 mph D-24 I HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis �nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 nalysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: Jamboree Rd. risdiction: tnalysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data jype of analysis Merge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �olume on freeway 7558 vph On Ramp Data tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 �ree-flow speed on ramp 40.0 mph olume on ramp 1610 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 1600 ft length of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data does adjacent ramp exist? No luma on adjacent Ramp vph osition of adjacent Ramp pe of adjacent Ramp !stance to adjacent Ramp ft triction Components Iolume, V (vph) (if one exists) Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 7558 1610 Adjacent vph D-25 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2054 437 Trucks and buses 5 5 0 ng Rolling Recreational vehicles 0 Terrain type: Rolli Grade Length mi mi Rolling mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 8831 1881 pcph v Estimation of V12 25-2 or 25-3) Capacity Actual Maximum LOS F? v 8212 9400 No FO v 4595 4600 No R12 Level of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 30.4 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.579 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 51.7 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 60.3 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 55.2 mph M HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis �nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Inalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: MacArthur BI. rlsdiction: analysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data type of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �olume on freeway 7621 vph Off Ramp Data ide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 2 ree-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 940 vph ngth of first accel/decel lane 1480 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane 0 ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one oes adjacent ramp exist? Yes olume on adjacent ramp 1330 vph osition of adjacent ramp Downstream ype of adjacent ramp On istance to adjacent ramp 1710 ft exists) Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions tnction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Iolume, V (vph) 7621 940 1330 vph D-27 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2071 255 361 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0' 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 8905 1098 1554 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.260 Using Equation 0 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 2665 pc/h 12 R F R FD I 1 J u Capacity Checks I Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 7124 9400 No Fi F v 2665 4400 No 12 v = v - v 6026 9400 No FO F R v 1098 3800 No R Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 0.5 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence A Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.592 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 51 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 66.5 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 59.9 mph a I �J HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis Inalyst: Archie Tangency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 pnalysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: MacArthur BI. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Data type of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Iolume on freeway 4015 vph Off Ramp Data tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 2 ree-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 490 vph ngth of first accel/decel lane 1480 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane 0 ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) goes adjacent ramp exist? Yes olume on adjacent ramp 1550 vph osition of adjacent ramp Downstream ype of adjacent ramp On istance to adjacent ramp 1710 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions tnction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Iolume, V (vph) 4015 490 1550 vph D-29 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1091 133 421 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling 'Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0,00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, f? 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4691 573 1811 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.260 Using Equation 0 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 1522 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks , Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 4222 9400 No Fi F v 1522 4400 No 12 v = v - v 3649 9400 No FO F R v 573 3800 No R Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = -9.3 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence A Speed Estimation I I I 1 I Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.545 , S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 52 mph R 'Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 69.9 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 62.4 mph ' D-30 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis Inalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Inalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: MacArthur BI. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Ilype of analysis umber of lanes in freeway Free -flow speed on freeway Iolume on freeway Data Merge 5 65.0 mph 7621 vph AT Aide of freeway Right umber of lanes in ramp 1 wl ee-flow speed on ramp 50.0 olume on ramp 2540 yength of first accel/decel lane 340 ngth of second accel/decel lane Ramp Data mph vph ft ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) goes adjacent ramp exist? Yes olume on adjacent Ramp 280 vph osition of adjacent Ramp Upstream ype of adjacent Ramp On istance to adjacent Ramp 1150 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Lnction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Iolume, V (vph) 7621 2540 280 vph D-31 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2071 690 76 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCF, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 8905 2968 327 pcph Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks ; Actual Maximum LOS F? v 9373 9400 No FO v 4600 Yes R12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.753 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 59.5 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 52.5 mph D-32 I HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c I hone: Fax: -mail: iMerge Analysis nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads Date performed: 10/05/2006 analysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: S R-73/N orth bound Junction: MacArthur BI. nsdiction: analysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Data type of analysis Merge umber of lanes in freeway 5 iree-flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph olume on freeway 4015 vph On Ramp Data 'Side of freeway Right umber of lanes in ramp 1 ree-flow speed on ramp 50.0 mph olume on ramp 2150 vph length of first accel/decel lane 340 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Iolume on adjacent Ramp 870 vph osition of adjacent Ramp Upstream Type of adjacent Ramp On �istance to adjacent Ramp 1150 Conversion to pc/h tnction Components Freeway ft Under Base Conditions Ramp Adjacent Ramp Iolume, V (vph) 4015 2150 870 vph D-33 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1091 584 236 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4691 2512 1017 pcph Estimation of V12 Merge L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 6171 9400 No FO v 4600 Yes R12 Level of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.335 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S S = mph = 60.2 mph = 59.0 mph I HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c I I hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis ,Analyst: Archie Tan ■gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads 'pate performed: 10/05/2006 Inalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound junction: MacArthur BI. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Data Type of analysis Merge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �olume on freeway 6351 vph On Ramp Data ide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 2 ree-flow speed on ramp 50.0 mph olume on ramp 2540 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 340 ft length of second accel/decel lane 0 ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one goes adjacent ramp exist? No olume on adjacent Ramp vph osition of adjacent Ramp 0 ype of adjacent Ramp istance to adjacent Ramp ft unction Components rlume, V (vph) exists) Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 6351 2540 D-35 Adjacent vph Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1726 690 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 7421 2968 pcph v Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.209 Using Equation 0 FM v = v (P ) = 1132 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 8386 9400 No FO v 4100 4600 No R12 Level of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 31.8 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D r I I r 1 Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.488 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 53.8 mph ' R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 59.1 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 56.4 mph r 11 D-36 I HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c I I hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis Ignalyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Analysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound unction: MacArthur BI. nsdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Data Ilype of analysis Merge Number of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �olume on freeway 3346 vph On Ramp Data tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 2 �ree-flow speed on ramp 50.0 mph olume on ramp 2150 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 340 ft length of second accel/decel lane 0 ft Adjacent Ramp 'goes adjacent ramp exist? No olume on adjacent Ramp osition of adjacent Ramp ype of adjacent Ramp istance to adjacent Ramp triction Components Iolume, V (vph) Data (if one exists) vph ILI Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 3346 2150 Adjacent vph D-37 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 909 584 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, f? 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3910 2512 pcph v Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.209 Using Equation 0 FM v = v (P ) = 637 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 5562 9400 No FO v 3149 4600 No R12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 24.6 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C peed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.344 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 57.1 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 62.5 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 59.3 mph JIM IHCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c lone: Fax: mail: Diverge Analysis �alyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads )ate performed: 10/05/2006 talysis time period: AM eway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound function: MacArthur BI. risdiction: Ilhalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use )escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data tpe of analysis Diverge mber of lanes in freeway 5 'ree-flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Fume on freeway 2459 vph ode of freeway Right umber of lanes in ramp 1 ee-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 2190 vph ngth of first accel/decel lane 1340 ft ngth of second accel/decei lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) oes adjacent ramp exist? Yes �fume on adjacent ramp 1000 vph osition of adjacent ramp Downstream Type of adjacent ramp Off !stance to adjacent ramp 1740 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions tnction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp 'olume, V (vph) 2459 2190 1000 vph D-39 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 668 595 272 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2873 2559 1168 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD V = v + (v - v ) P = 2696 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 2873 9400 No Fi F v 2696 4400 No 12 v = v - v 314 9400 No FO F R v 2559 2000 Yes R .Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 15.4 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence F Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.723 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 48 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 71.3 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 49.3 mph go I IHCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c J hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis, Inalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads Date performed: 10/05/2006 Gnalysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: MacArthur Bl. risdiction: analysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Freeway type of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 =ree-flow speed on freeway 65.0 olume on freeway 6497 mph vph Off Ramp Data 'Side of freeway Right umber of lanes in ramp 1 ree-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 2230 vph f ngth of first accel/decel lane 1340 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? No �olume on adjacent ramp vph osition of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp '!stance to adjacent ramp ft Lction Components Iolume, V (vph) Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 6497 2230 D-41 Adjacent vph Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, 05 1765 606 Trucks and'buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0/0 Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 7592 2606 pcph v 1 11 Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas 'I L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v =v +(v-v)P = 4118 pc/h , 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks ' Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 6074 9400 No Fi F v 4118 4400 No 12 v = v - v 3468 9400 No FO F R v 2606 2000 Yes R Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 27.6 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence F Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.728 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 48 ,mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 71.3 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 53.9 mph D-42 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c I IJ hone: Fax: -mail: ' Diverge Analysis nalyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads Date performed: 10/05/2006 fnalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: MacArthur BI. nsdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data Ilype of analysis Diverge Number of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Iolume on freeway 2047 vph Off Ramp Data Ilide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 2 ree-Flow, speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 2190 vph ngth of first accel/decel lane 1340 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane 0 ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) goes adjacent ramp exist? Yes 0 oluma on adjacent ramp 1000 vph osition of adjacent ramp Downstream ype of adjacent ramp Off istance to adjacent ramp 1740 ft tnction Components Iolume, V (vph) Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 2047 2190 1000 Adjacent vph D-43 Peak-hourfactor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, V15 556 595 272 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2392 2559 . 1168 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.260 Using Equation 0 FD v =v +(v-v)P = 2516 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 2392 9400 No Fi F v 2516 4400 No 12 v = v - v -167 9400 No FO F R v 2559 3800 No R Level of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 1.8 pc/mi/ln R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence A Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.723 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 48 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 71.3 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 47.6 mph Ima J l l HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis Ignalyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 gnalysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound unction: MacArthur BI. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Data ilype of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Iolume on freeway 5414 vph Off Ramp Data tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 2 �ree-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 2230 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 1340 ft length of second accel/decel lane 0 ft Adjacent Ramp Toes adjacent ramp exist? No #olume on adjacent ramp osition of adjacent ramp ype of adjacent ramp istance to adjacent ramp function Components Iolume, V (vph) Data (if one exists) vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 5414 2230 D-45 Adjacent vph Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1471 606 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 6326 2606 pcph v Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.260 Using Equation 0 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3327 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOST? v = v 5378 9400 No Fi F v 3327 4400 No 12 v = v - v 2772 9400 No FO F R v 2606 3800 No R Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 8.7 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence A peed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.728 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 48 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 71.2 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 55.0 mph [1 11 IA F1 I :J 17 I I D-46 1 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysi Itnalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.. Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 ffnalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: University Dr. urisdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update ffype of analysis Merge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 �olume on freeway 7621 On fide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 ree-flow speed on ramp 20.0 olume on ramp 1330 Length of first accel/decel lane 200 length of second accel/decel lane Adjacent Ramp oes adjacent ramp exist? Yes olume on adjacent Ramp 280 Data mph vph Ramp Data mph vph ft ft Data (if one exists vph osition of adjacent Ramp Downstream ype of adjacent Ramp On istance to adjacent Ramp 200 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions 'unction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Iolume, V (vph) 7621 1330 280 vph D-47 Deak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Deak 15-min volume, v15 2071 361 76 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 -Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 8905 1554 327 pcph Estimation of VI Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ' P = 0.135 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 865 pc/h 12 F FM Actual Maximum v 7959 9400 FO v 2419 4600 R12 Capacity Checks LOS F? No No Level of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 22.4 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.357 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 56.8 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 55.7 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 56.0 mph I 11 1 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis �nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Analysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: University Dr. nsdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Freeway Data pe of analysis Merge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph flume on freeway 4015 vph Ide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 tee -flow speed on ramp 20.0 lume on ramp 1550 Length of first accel/decel lane 200 Fngth of second accel/decel lane Ramp Data mph vph ft Adjacent'Ramp Data (if one exists) e�nt ramp exist? exist? Yes luma on adjacent Ramp 870 vph sition of adjacent Ramp Downstream pe of adjacent Ramp On stance to adjacent Ramp 200 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Inction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp tlume, V (vph) 4015 1550 870 vph D-49 -leak -hour factor, PH 0.92 0.92 0.92 leak 15-min volume, v15 1091 421 236 v trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % retrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 -ieavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 )river population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 :low rate, vp 4691 1811 1017 pcph Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.103 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 377 pc/h 12 F FM Actual Maximum v 5470 9400 FO v 2188 4600 R12 Capacity Checks LOS F? No We Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 20.5 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.348 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 57.0 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 60.9 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 59.3 mph 1I L i 1 i i 1 I 1 11 r 1 1 1 11 i C 1 D-50 ' HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis ignalyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Analysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: University Dr. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use ascription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Hype of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 1olume on freeway 2459 tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 Iree-Flow speed on ramp 35.0 olume on ramp 810 Length of first accel/decel lane 1400 langth of second accel/decel lane Data mph vph Ramp mph vph ft ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Noes adjacent ramp exist? Yes (01S�Itlon a on adjacent ramp 610 vph of adjacent ramp Downstream pe of adjacent ramp On iistance to adjacent ramp 2050 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions unction Components rlume, V (vph) Freeway Ramp Ramp 2459 810 610 D-51 Adjacent vph Peak -hour factor, PH 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 668 220 166 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: 'Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2873 946 713 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 1786 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 2873 9400 No Fi F v 1786 4400 No 12 v = v - v 1927 9400 No FO F R v 946 2000 No R Level of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 7.0 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence A Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.513 S Space mean speed in ramp'influence area, S =53 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 71.3 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 58.9 mph D-52 ' HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis, fe alyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads te performed: 10/05/2006 alysis time period: PM Sreeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound nction: University Dr. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Freeway Data Itype of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �olume on freeway 6497 vph Off Ramp Data fide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 �ree-Flow speed on ramp 35.0 mph olume on ramp 850 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 1400 ft length of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists Soes adjacent ramp exist? Yes oluma on adjacent ramp 1610 vph osition of adjacent ramp Downstream ype of adjacent ramp On istance to adjacent ramp 2050 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Uction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Iolume, V (vph) 6497 850 1610 vph D-53 peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 peak 15-min volume, v15 1765 231 437 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 -ieavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 7592 993 1881 pcph Estimation of VI Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3208 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 6074 9400 No Fi F v 3208 4400 No 12 v = v - v 5081 9400 No FO F R v 993 2000 No R Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 19.2 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.517 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 53 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 69.6 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 59.8 mph D-54 HCS2000:.Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis nalyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 alysis time period: AM leeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound nction: Bison Av. fnsdl?tion: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Freeway Data IVpe of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Iolume on freeway 7621 vph Off Ramp Data tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 e-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph Uume on ramp 520 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 0 ft 11ength of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists oes adjacent ramp exist? Yes �Olume on adjacent ramp 940 vph 'yosition of adjacent ramp Downstream pe of adjacent ramp Off istance to adjacent ramp 1480 ft `riction Components Iolume, V (vph) Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 7621 520 940 D-55 Adjacent vph Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2071 141 255 v Trucks and buses 5 5 0 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment,, fHV 0.930 0.930 1.000 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 8905 608 1022 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3449 pc/h 12 R F R FD J I I Capacity Checks , Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 7124 9400 No Fi F v 3449 4400 No 12 v = v - v 6516 9400 No FO F R v 608 2000 No R of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 33.9 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.548 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 52 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 68.0 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 59.5 mph I u I D-56 1 t HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c t t tone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis nalyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Irnalysis time period: PM eeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound unction: Bison Av. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data ffVpe of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph rlume on freeway 4015 vph Off Ramp Data tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 Itee-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph lume on ramp 300 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 0 ft lIngth of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists 15oes adjacent ramp exist? Yes lum9 on adjacent ramp 490 vph osition of adjacent ramp Downstream pe of adjacent ramp Off istance to adjacent ramp 1480 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions tnction Components Nolume, V (vph) Freeway Ramp Ramp 4015 300 490 D-57 Adjacent vph Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1091 82 133 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP' 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4691 351 573 pcph Estimation of VI Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = V + (v - v ) P = 2039 pc/h 12 R F R FD 1 11 Capacity Checks , Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 4222 9400 No Fi F v 2039 4400 No 12 v = v - v 3871 9400 No FO F R v 351 2000 No R Level of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 21.8 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.525 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 53 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 71.0 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.9 mph ;J I 1 I D-58 L I 1 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis Ign aI st: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 fnalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: Bison Av. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway ffype of analysis Merge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �olume on freeway 7621 vph On Ramp Data tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 �ree-flow speed on ramp 40.0 mph olume on ramp 280 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 250 ft length of second accel/decel lane ft � � Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) o'D es adjacent ramp exist? No 0 oluma on adjacent Ramp vph osition of adjacent Ramp ype of adjacent Ramp !stance to adjacent Ramp ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions '.auction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp �olume, V (vph) 7621 280 vph D-59 Peak -hour factor,, PH 0.92 0,92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2071 76 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 8905 327 pcph v Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.247 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 1580 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 6732 9400 No FO v 1907 4600 No R12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0,00627 L = 18.6 pc/milln R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M= 0.327 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 57.5 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 57.8 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 57.7 mph DAM HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis alyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 �alysis time period: PM eeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: Bison Av. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data Wpe of analysis Merge Number of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 flume on freeway 4015 On de of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 te-flow speed on ramp e 40.0 fume on ramp 870 ngth of first accel/decel lane 250 ngth of second accel/decel lane mph vph Ramp Data mph vph ft ft Adjacent Ramp Does adjacent ramp exist? No lume on adjacent Ramp sition of adjacent Ramp ype of adjacent Ramp !stance to adjacent Ramp Inction Components rlume, V (vph) Data (if one exists) vph Conversion to pc/h Under Base Condition Freeway Ramp Ramp 4015 870 Adjacent vph D-61 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1091 236 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4691 1017 pcph Pi Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.160 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 587 pclh 12 F FM Capacity Checks ' Actual Maximum LOS F? v 4676 9400 No FO v 1604 4600 No R12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 16.0 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.320 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 57.6 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 61.3 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.0 mph 1 H I I n D-62 E HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c t.one: Fax: mail: Diverge Analysis alyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 kalysis time period: AM eeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound unction: Bison Av. risdiction: Walysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data Wpe of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Ilume on freeway 2459 vph Off Ramp Data fide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 �lotee-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph lume on ramp 1000 vph ngth of first accel/decel lane 0 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists oes adjacent ramp exist? No olume on adjacent ramp vph osition of adjacent ramp ype of adjacent ramp istance to adjacent ramp ft tnction Components Iolume, V (vph) Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 2459 1000 Adjacent vph D-63 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 668 272 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2873 1168 pcph Z Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v =v +(v-v)P = 1911 pc/h 12• R F R FD Capacity Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 2873 9400 No Fi F v 1911 4400 No 12 v = v - v 1705 9400 No FO F R v 1168 2000 No R Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 20.7 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.598 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 51 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 71.3 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 56.6 mph I F J L' L C L D-64 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c one: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis alyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 dalysis time period: PM eewayldir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: Bison Av. dnsdiction: ialysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Freeway Data pe of analysis Diverge Number of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph flume on freeway 6497 vph Off Ramp Data Fide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 loee-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph lume on ramp 350 vph ngth of first accel/decel lane 0 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) 'Does adjacent ramp exist? No lume on adjacent ramp vph sition of adjacent ramp ype of adjacent ramp istance to adjacent ramp ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions unction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp �lume, V (vph) 6497 350 vph D-65 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1765 95 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 7592 409 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 2879 pc/h 12 R F R FD v I I I H I I I I Capacity Checks I Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 6074 9400 No Fi F v 2879 4400 No 12 v = v - v 5665 9400 No FO F R v 409 2000 No R Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 29.0 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.530 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 53 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 69.0 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.2 .mph I I I I I I J I D-66 I I HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis nalyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads Date performed: 10105/2006 Inalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: Bison Av. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data Bype of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free -flow speed on freeway Iolume on freeway ide of freeway F umber of lanes in ramp -ee-flow speed on ramp plume on ramp mgth of first accel/decel lane :path of second accel/decel lane :s adjacent ramp exist? ume on adjacent Ramp >ition of adjacent Ramp ie of adjacent Ramp tance to adjacent Ramp Components Ramp Data Ramp Data (if one exists) Downstream Off Conversion to pc/h Conditions Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 668 30 111 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0,930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2873 129 479 pcph Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.437 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 980 pc/h 12 F FM I I u I I Capacity Checks , Actual Maximum LOS F? v 2370 9400 No FO v 1109 4600 No R12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 9.4 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence A Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.281 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 58.5 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 64.5 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.6 mph I I I D-68 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c l l hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis Ign aI t: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 gnalysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: Bison Av. likirisdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update llype of analysis umber of lanes in freeway Free -flow speed on freeway Iolume on freeway Data Merge 5 65.0 mph 6497 vph On Ramp Data tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 �ree-flow speed on ramp 35.0 mph olume on ramp 430 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 740 ft length of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one oboes adjacent ramp exist? Yes olumn on adjacent Ramp 510 vph osition of adjacent Ramp 0 Downstream ype of adjacent Ramp Off istance to adjacent Ramp 2645 ft linction Components Iolume, V (vph) exists) Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 6497 430 510 D-69 Adjacent vph peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Deak 15-min volume, v15 1765 117 139 Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 -leavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 7592 502 596 pcph Estimation of VI Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.391 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 2122 pclh 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 5931 9400 No FO v 2624 4600 No R12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) v Density, D = 5.475+ 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 21.1 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.323 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 57.6 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 60.8 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 59.4 mph LJ u l I I r D-70 C] ' HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: ' Diverge Analysis Inalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads Date performed: 10/05/2006 Wnalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: S R-73/N orth bound Junction: Bonita Canyon Dr. urisdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Us Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update type of analysis umber of lanes in freeway Free -flow speed on freeway rolume on freeway of freeway F )er of lanes in ramp Flow speed on ramp ne on ramp th of first accel/decel lane th of second accel/decel lane adjacent ramp exist? ne on adjacent ramp on of adjacent ramp of adjacent ramp ice to adjacent ramp triction Components Data Off Ramp Data Data (if one exists Downstream Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Peak -hour factor, PH 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2445 264 187 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 10514 1133 806 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0,436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 4307 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 8412 9400 No Fi F v 4307 4400 No 12 v = v - v 7279 9400 No FO F R v 1133 2000 No R Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 30.0 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.595 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 51 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 67.2 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 58.0 mph D-72 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c [1 hone: Fax: _ mail: Diverge Analysis fa alyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads te performed: 10/05/2006 nalysis time period: PM Weeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: Bonita Canyon Dr. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data hype of analysis Diverge Number of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Iolume on freeway 4739 vph Off Ramp Data ide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 ree-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 220 vph ngth of first accel/decel lane 1250 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) goes adjacent ramp exist? Yes 0 oluma on adjacent ramp 420 vph osition of adjacent ramp Downstream ype of adjacent ramp On istance to adjacent ramp 3320 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions tnction Components Iolume, V (vph) Freeway Ramp Ramp 4739 220 420 D-73 Adjacent vph peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 'eak 15-min volume, v15 1288 60 114 v ('rucks and buses 5 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 % terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0:00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 2.0 -leavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 0.930 )river population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 -low rate, vp 5537 257 491 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 2197 pc/h 12 R F R FD Actual Maximum v = v 4707 9400 Fi F v 2197 4400 12 v = v - v 4450 9400 FO F R v 257 2000 R Capacity Checks LOS F? No No No No Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 11.9 pc/mi/In R 12 D -evel of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B Speed Estimation ntermediate speed variable, D = 0.516 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 53 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 70.3 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.1 mph D-74 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c L tone: Fax: mail: Merge Analysis �nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Inalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: Bonita Canyon Dr. risdiction: analysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Freeway Data Sype of analysis Merge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Iolume on freeway 7621 vph 1071 Nide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 ree-flow speed on ramp 25.0 olume on ramp 690 ngth of first accel/decel lane 2440 ngth of second accel/decel lane Ramp Data mph vph ft ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) goes adjacent ramp exist? No 0olume on adjacent Ramp vph osition of adjacent Ramp ype of adjacent Ramp istance to adjacent Ramp ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions tnction Components Iolume, V (vph) Freeway Ramp Ramp 7621 690 Adjacent vph D-75 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2071 187 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 8905 806 pcph tr Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 1.000 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 6405 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 7211 9400 No FO v 7211 4600 Yes R12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 46.1 pc/mi/in R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence F Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 5.481 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 65.0 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = mph BE ' HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c 'hone: Fax: mail: ' Merge Analysis analyst: Archie Tan agency/Co.: Urban Crossroads Date performed: 10/0 V2006 �alysis time period: PM eeway/dir or travel: SRir3/Northbound Junction: Bonita Canyon Dr. Orisdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data &pe of analysis Merge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Flume on freeway 4015 vph AN Tide of freeway Right umber of lanes in ramp 1 Foee-flow speed on ramp 25.0 lume on ramp 420 ngth of first accel/decel lane 2440 ngth of second accel/decel lane Ramp Data mph vph ft ft _Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) oes adjacent ramp exist? No ijolume on adjacent Ramp vph osition of adjacent Ramp Type of adjacent Ramp istance to adjacent Ramp ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Lction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp 'olume, V (vph) 4015 420 vph D-77 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1091 114 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4691 491 pcph AJ Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or25-3) EQ P = 1.000 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 3659 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks I 11 11 Actual Maximum LOS F? v 4150 9400 No ' FO v 4150 4600 No R12 , Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 22.3 pC/mi/In R R 12 A C Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence , Speed Estimation , Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.446 S mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 54.7 mph 'Space R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 65.0 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 54.7 mph I D-78 H L I HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis �nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Inalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: Bonita Canyon Dr. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Description: Newport Beach General Plan Data type of analysis umber of lanes in freeway Free -flow speed on freeway Iolume on freeway Ramp Data of freeway Der of lanes in flow speed on on ramp of first accel/decel lane of second accel/decel lane adjacent ramp exist? ne on adjacent Ramp on of adjacent Ramp of adjacent Ramp ice to adjacent Ramp Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Components Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2071 187 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 8905 806 pcph u Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.592 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 3792 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks I Actual Maximum LOS F? v 7211 9400 No FO v 4598 4600 No R12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 34.3 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.655 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 49.9 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 62.1 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 53.8 mph I I I D I J I I '1 D-80 l l l HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis Jgalyst:Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Inalysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: Bonita Canyon Dr. jurisdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp ascription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Freeway Data ffype of analysis Merge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 �olume on freeway 4015 On fide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 �ree-flow speed on ramp 25.0 olume on ramp 420 Length of first accel/decel lane 1065 length of second accel/decel lane mph vph Ramp Data mph vph ft ft Adjacent Ramp 'Does adjacent ramp exist? No oluma on adjacent Ramp osition of adjacent Ramp ype of adjacent Ramp !stance to adjacent Ramp function Components Iolume, V (vph) Data (if one exists) vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 4015 420 D-81 Adjacent vph Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1091 114 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4691 491 pcph IN Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.631 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 2310 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 4150 9400 No FO v 2801 4600 No R12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 20.4 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level •of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.332 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 57.4 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 64.4 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 59.5 mph E J LJ LJ P E 1 D M J ' HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: 1 Diverge Analysis Inalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads Date performed: 10/05/2006 Fnalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: Bonita Canyon Dr. tnrisdiction: alysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Freeway Nype of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Rolume on freeway 2459 vph Off Ramp Data 'Side of freeway Right umber of lanes in ramp 1 ree-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 410 vph tngth of first accel/decel lane 0 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? No �olume on adjacent ramp vph osition of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp istance to adjacent ramp ft Lction Components Iolume, V (vph) Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 2459 410 D-83 Adjacent vph Peak -hour factor, PH 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 668 111 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0,930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2873 479 pcph v Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 '(Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 1523 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 2873' 9400 No Fi F v 1523 4400 No 12 v = v - v 2394 9400 No FO F R v 479 2000 No R Level of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 17.3 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.536 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 53 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 71.3 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.0 mph C E 1 I I I J I H U l _1 D-84 ' HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c n F.one: Fax: _ F. Diverge Analysis alyst: Archie Tan Tency/Co.. Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 ialysis time period: PM eeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound unction: Bonita Canyon Dr. tnsdiotion: ialysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data Wpe of analysis Diverge Number of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �lume on freeway 6497 vph Off Ramp Data Ide Right of freeway Number of lanes in ramp 1 tee-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph lume on ramp 510 vph of first accel/decel lane 0 ft ingth ngth of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) oes adjacent ramp exist? No olume on adjacent ramp vph sition of adjacent ramp ype of adjacent ramp istance to adjacent ramp ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions tnction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Nolume, V (vph) 6497 510 vph D-85 ' 'eak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 peak 15-min volume, v15 1765 139 v trucks and buses 5 5 % ' Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % , Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 -leavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, f? 1.00 1.00 ::low rate, vp 7592 596 pcph , Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas ' L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 , FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 2984 pc/h 12 R F R FD , Capacity Checks ' Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 6074 9400 No Fi F v 2984 4400 No 12 ' v = v - v 5478 9400 No FO F R v 596 2000 No ' R Level of Service Determination (if not F} , Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 29.9 pc/mi/In , R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D Speed Estimation ' Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.547 , S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 52 mph R 'Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 69.2 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 59.8 mph , D-86 I II HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis �nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 rnalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: Bonita Canyon Dr. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Freeway lype of analysis Merge Number of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 ,olume on freeway 2459 A 'Side of freeway Right umber of lanes in ramp 1 ree-flow speed on ramp 35.0 olume on ramp 300 jength of first accel/decel lane 400 ngth of second accel/decel lane Data mph vph Ramp Data mph vph ft ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) oes adjacent ramp exist? No Ooluma on adjacent Ramp vph osition of adjacent Ramp ype of adjacent Ramp istance to adjacent Ramp ft tnction Components Iolume, V (vph) Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp 2459 300 vph 91 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 668 82 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2873 351 pcph v Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.301 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 675 pc/h 12 F FM I E I U l_I n H Capacity Checks I Actual Maximum LOS F? v 2592 9400 No FO v 1026 4600 No R12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 10.8 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.304 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 58.0 mph. R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 64.0 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61,5 mph n u U I H D-88 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c t,one: Fax: _ mail: Merge Analysis alyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 12/12/2005 alysis time period: PM eeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound unction: Bonita Canyon Dr. Wirisdiction: alysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data IVpe of analysis Merge umber of lanes in freeway 5 =ree-flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �lume on freeway 6497 vph On Ramp Data Ide of freeway Right Vumber of lanes in ramp 1 t-le-flow speed on ramp 35.0 mph lume on ramp 790 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 400 ft Fngth of second accel/decel lane Adjacent Ramp goes adjacent ramp exist? No (OSI�ItTilon a on adjacent Ramp of adjacent Ramp pe of adjacent Ramp istance to adjacent Ramp traction Components Iolume, V (vph) m Data (if one exists) vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 6497 790 Adjacent vph 6 :., 'eak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 ' Deak 15-min volume, v15 1765 215 v ('rucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % ' Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % ' Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 , -leavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 =low rate, vp 7592 923 pcph ' Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.230 Using Equation 4 ' FM v = v (P ) = 1248 pc/h 12 F FM ' Capacity Checks , Actual Maximum LOS F? v 6352 9400 No FO ' v 2171 4600 No R12 , Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 19.5 pc/mi/In ' R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B , Speed Estimation ' Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.327 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 57.5 mph ' R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 59.3 mph 0 ' Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 58.6 mph J D-90 , HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c Il hone: Fax: -mail: ' Diverge Analysis rnalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads Date performed: 10/05/2006 analysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: Newport Coast Dr. nsdiction: analysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Freeway Data pe of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph 'olume on freeway 10083 vph Off Ramp Data 'Side of freeway Right �umber of lanes in ramp 1 ree-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 530 vph tngth of first accel/decel lane 0 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Does adjacent ramp exist? No �olume on adjacent ramp osition of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp istance to adjacent ramp Data (if one exists) vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions tnction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp 'olume, V (vph) 10083 530 vph D-91 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2740 144 v Trucks and buses 5 5 % , Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % , Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 11782 619 pcph '. Estimation• of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ ' P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 4459 pc/h ' 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks I Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 9426 9400 Yes Fi F v 4459 4400 Yes 12 ' v = v - v 8807 9400 No FO F R v 619 2000 No ' R Level of Service Determination (if not F) , Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 42.6 pc/mi/In ' R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence F Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.549 ' S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 52 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 65.5 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 58.6 mph , D-92 u HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c u hone: Fax: -mail: iDiverge Analysis. analyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads Date performed: 10/05/2006 Inalysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: Newport Coast Dr. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data Bype of analysis Diverge Number of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph lolume on freeway 5311 vph Off Ramp Data ide of freeway Right �umber of lanes in ramp 1 ree-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 280 vph length of first accel/decel lane 0 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) foes adjacent ramp exist? No oluma on adjacent ramp vph osition of adjacent ramp ype of adjacent ramp istance to adjacent ramp ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions traction Components Iolume, V (vph) Freeway Ramp Ramp 5311 280 D-93 Adjacent vph Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1443 76 v Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi 11 u u Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 6206 327 pcph �• Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas ' L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ ' P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 2485 pc/h , 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks ' Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 5276 9400 No , Fi F v 2485 4400 No 12 t v = v - v 4949 9400 No FO F R v 327 2000 No R Level of Service Determination (if not F) , Density, D = 4.252 + M086 v - 0.009 L = 25.6 pc/mi/In , R 12 . D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation , Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.522 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 53 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 69.8 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.7 mph ' D-94 l HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c l l hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis �nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Inalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound unction: Newport Coast Dr. nsdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update Data llype of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �olume on freeway 8402 vph Off Ramp Data fide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 aree-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 530 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 240 ft length of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp lboes adjacent ramp exist? No 0 oluma on adjacent ramp osition of adjacent ramp ype of adjacent ramp !stance to adjacent ramp tnction Components Iolume, V (vph) Data (if one exists) vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 8402 530 Adjacent vph D-95 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-.min volume, v15 2283 144 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 9818 619 pcph v Estimation of VI Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3774 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 7855 9400 No Fi F v 3774 4400 No 12 v = v - v 7236 9400 No FO F R v 619 2000 No R Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 34.5 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.549 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 52 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 67.2 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 59.2 mph u F u I `J I LJ I P r I D-96 I HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis Ign alyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 nalysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: Newport Coast Dr. trIsdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Data ffype of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �olume on freeway 4426 vph Off Ramp Data fide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 ree-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 280 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 240 ft length of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists goes adjacent ramp exist? No 0 olume on adjacent ramp vph osition of adjacent ramp ype of adjacent ramp &istance to adjacent ramp ft Uction Components rlume, V (vph) Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditio Freeway Ramp Ramp 4426 280 D-97 Adjacent vph Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1203 76 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1,00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 5172 327 pcph LIIFJ Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v =v +(v-v)P = 2214 pc/h 12 R F R FD 11 L� t 1 Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 4655 9400 No Fi F v 2214 4400 No 12 v = v - v 4328 9400 No FO F R v 327 2000 No R Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 21.1 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation , Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.522 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 53 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 70.4 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.9 mph ' D-98 I d HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: wMerge Analysis �nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 fnalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: Newport Coast Dr. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Sype of analysis Merge Number of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Iolume on freeway 10083 vph 0 19ide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 ree-flow speed on ramp 25.0 olume on ramp 580 length of first accelldecei lane 1250 �ength of second accel/decel lane Ramp Data mph vph ft ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) oes adjacent ramp exist? No 0 oluma on adjacent Ramp vph osition of adjacent Ramp ype of adjacent Ramp istance to adjacent Ramp ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Uction Components Iolume, V (vph) Freeway Ramp Ramp 10083 580 Adjacent vph R .. 3eak hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 )eak 15-min volume, v15 2740 158 'rucks and buses 5 5 % recreational vehicles 0 0 % 'errain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi ('rucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 2ecreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Leavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0,930 0.930 )river population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 -low rate, vp 11782 678 pcph v Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.691 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 6410 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks , Actual Maximum LOS F? v 9960 9400 Yes FO v 7088 4600 Yes R12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 52.6 pc/mi/In R R 12 A -evel of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence F Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable M = 4.929 �S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S S = mph = 61.6 mph = 213.7 mph I u I rl I u Ll I D-100 I ' HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c 'hone: Fax: E-mail: IMerge Analysis jnalyst: Archie Tan ■gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads Date performed: 10/05/2006 analysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: Newport Coast Dr. nrisdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Freeway Data type of analysis Merge umber of lanes in freeway 5 �ree-flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph olume on freeway 5311 vph On Ramp Data Ide of freeway Right umber of lanes in ramp 1 ree-flow speed on ramp 25.0 mph olume on ramp 330 vph ngth of first accel/decel lane 1250 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? No �olume on adjacent Ramp vph osition of adjacent Ramp Type of adjacent Ramp 'istance to adjacent Ramp ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Lction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp /olume, V (vph) 5311 330 D-101 vph ■ Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1443 90 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling. Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 6206 386 pcph v Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.727 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 3429 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 5103 9400 No FO v 3815 4600 No R12 Level of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 27.2 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.435 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 55.0 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 64.5 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 57.1 mph 11 11 11 11 it 11 11 11 L✓ II D-102 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis ow Ign alyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 gnalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Northbound Junction: Newport Coast Dr. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Data of analysis Merge Bype Number of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �olume on freeway 8403 vph On Ramp Data tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 ree-flow speed on ramp 25.0 mph olume on ramp 580 vph ngth of first accel/decel lane 880 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane t ft Adjacent Ramp 'Does adjacent ramp exist? No lua on adjacent Ramp f,00sltlon of adjacent Ramp pe of adjacent Ramp istance to adjacent Ramp traction Components Iolume, V (vph) Data (if one exists) vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 8403 580 D-103 Adjacent vph Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2283 158 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE,'ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 9819 678 pcph v Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.526 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P j = 3846 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks ' Actual Maximum LOS F? v 7997 9400 No FO v 4524 4600 No R12 ■ Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 34.9 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp-freewayjunction areas of influence D Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.637 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 50.4 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 60.6 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 54.3 mph D-104 I HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Inalysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: S R-73/N orth bound Junction: Newport Coast Dr. risdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Data Eype of analysis Merge =' Number of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Iolume on freeway 4425 vph On Ramp Data Ride of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 ree-flow speed on ramp 25.0 mph olume on ramp 330 vph ngth of first accei/decel lane 880 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) oes adjacent ramp exist? No oluma on adjacent Ramp vph osition of adjacent Ramp ype of adjacent Ramp !stance to adjacent Ramp ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions tnction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp �olume, V (vph) 4425 330 vph D-105 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 1202 90 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Rolling Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 5171 386 pcph v Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.562 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 2267 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks ' Actual Maximum LOS F? v 4420 9400 No ■ FO ■ v 2653 4600 No R12 Level of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0,00627 L = 20.5 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.332 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 57.4 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 63.6 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 59.7 mph D-106 HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis low— nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 rnalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: Newport Coast Dr. urisdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data I[ype of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Iolume on freeway 2903 vph Off Ramp Data tide of freeway Right umber of lanes in ramp 1 ree-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 680 vph �ength of first accel/decel lane 0 ft ength of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) oes adjacent ramp exist? No oluma on adjacent ramp vph osition of adjacent ramp ype of adjacent ramp !stance to adjacent ramp ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions `mction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp �olume, V (vph) 2903 680 vph D-107 ' Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 789 185 v Trucks and buses 5 5 % ' Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Level Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % , Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 ' Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0,930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3392 795 pcph ' Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas ' L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 1927 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 3392 9400 No Fi F v 1927- 4400 No 12 v = v - v 2597 9400 No FO F R v 795 2000 No R Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 20.8 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.565 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 52 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 71.3 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 58.9 mph P I: ' HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c tone: Fax: mail: Diverge Analysis �alyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads Date performed: 10/05/2006 ralysis time period: PM eeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: Newport Coast Dr. risdiction: •11.' alysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use \n z Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data pe of analysis Diverge fr,r umber of lanes in freeway 5 -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph Pee lume on freeway 7671 vph Off Ramp Data Wide of freeway Right umber of lanes in ramp 1 u, ee-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 1060 vph ngth of first accel/decel lane 0 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data hoes adjacent ramp exist? No �olume on adjacent ramp vph sition of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp '!stance to adjacent ramp ft (if one exists) Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions tnction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp 'olume, V (vph) 7671 1060 vph D-109 )eak-hour factor, PH 0.92 0.92 Deak 15-min volume, v15 2085 288 (rucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % rerrain type: Rolling Rolling Level Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi rrucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 -leavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0,930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 -low rate, vp 8963 1239 pcph n Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3825 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F7 v = v: 7171 9400 No F1':F • . _. v = ( • 3825 4400 No 12'• v = v - v 5932 9400 No FO F R v 1239 2000 No R - Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 37.1 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence E Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.605 ' S Space mean speed in, ramp influence area, S = 51 mph R 'Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 68.7 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 58.0 mph ' D-110 , HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4,1c hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis Ignalyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 Fnalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: Newport Coast Dr. rlsdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update Freeway Data lype of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph 'olume on freeway 2903 vph Off Ramp Data Tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 �ree-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 680 vph ength of first accel/decel lane 240 ft ngth of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) goes adjacent ramp exist? No 0 oluma on adjacent ramp vph osition of adjacent ramp ype of adjacent ramp istance to adjacent ramp ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Uction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp �olume, V (vph) 2903 680 vph D-111 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 789 185 v Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Level Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3392 795 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 1927 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 3392 9400 No Fi F v 1927 4400 No 12 v = v - v 2597 9400 No FO F R v 795 2000 No R Level of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 18.7 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service.for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.565 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 52 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 71.3 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 58.9 mph D-112 l HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c l l hone: Fax: -mail: Diverge Analysis ignalyst: Archie Tan ency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 nalysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: Newport Coast Dr. urisdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted LU w/ Imp escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update ffype of analysis Diverge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 mph �olume on freeway 7671 vph Off Ramp Data fide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 �ree-Flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 1060 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 240 ft length of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) oes adjacent ramp exist? No olume on adjacent ramp vph osition of adjacent ramp ype of adjacent ramp JQistance to adjacent ramp ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions function Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp �olume, V (vph) 7671 1060 vph D-113 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2085 288 v Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Level Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 8963 1239 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-8 or 25-9) EQ P = 0.436 Using Equation 8 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3825 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks ' Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 7171 9400 No Fi F v 3825 4400 No 12 v = v - v 5932 9400 No FO F R v 1239 2000 No R Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 35.0- pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.605 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 51 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 68.7 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 58.0 mph E i E D-114 ' HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1 c hone: Fax: -mail: ' Merge Analysis Inalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads Date performed: 10/05/2006 Fnalysis time period: AM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: Newport Coast Dr. urisdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use Description: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway- Data Nype of analysis Merge umber of lanes in freeway 5 Free -flow speed on freeway 65.0 rolume on freeway 2903 On tide of freeway Right of lanes in ramp 1 oumber ree-flow speed on ramp 30.0 olume on ramp 470 of first accel/decel lane 360 iength ength of second accel/decel lane mph vph Ramp Data mph vph ft ft Adjacent Ramp TDoes adjacent ramp exist? No �olume on adjacent Ramp osition of adjacent Ramp Type of adjacent Ramp Iistance to adjacent Ramp lnction Components Iolume, V (vph) Data (if one exists vph fLI Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp 2903 470 vph D-115 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 789 128 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Level Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, f? 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3392 549 pcph Estimation of V12 Merge L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.283 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 749 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 3195 9400 No FO v = ' 1298 4600 No R12 v Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 13.1 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.314 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 57.8 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 63.4 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.0 mph D-116 ' HCS2000: Ramps and Ramp Junctions Release 4.1c hone: Fax: -mail: Merge Analysis �nalyst: Archie Tan gency/Co.: Urban Crossroads ate performed: 10/05/2006 nalysis time period: PM reeway/dir or travel: SR-73/Southbound Junction: Newport Coast Dr. iii1prisdiction: nalysis Year: City Council Adopted Land Use escription: Newport Beach General Plan Update ' Freeway Data llype of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free -flow speed on freeway Iolume on freeway Merge 5 65.0 mph 7671 vph On Ramp tide of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 �ree-flow speed on ramp 30.0 mph olume on ramp 570 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 360 ft Iength of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists goes adjacent ramp exist? No olume on adjacent Ramp vph osition of adjacent Ramp ype of adjacent Ramp tstance to adjacent Ramp ft 'unction Components iolume, V (vph) Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Ramp 7671 570 Adjacent vph D-117 peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 2085 155 Trucks and buses 5 5 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Rolling Rolling Level Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 2.5 2.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 2.0 2.0 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.930 0.930 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 8963 666 pcph v Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 0.00 (Equation 25-2 or 25-3) EQ P = 0.268 Using Equation 4 FM v = v (P ) = 1734 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 7129 9400 No FO v 2400 4600 No R12 Level of Service Determination (if not Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 21.6 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service'for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.342 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 57.1 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 58.1 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 57.8 mph D-118 1.N rm S.'V 4. N 5. J; 6.0 7.B B. C 9. Ir 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. F17. 18. C.Mocuments and SettingslswoodkLocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files%OLK7BDgLOSOcto6.xls]T--1 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTION' Level of Service Description Volume to Capacity Ratio A Level of Service A occurs when progression is 0.600 and below extremely favorable and vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. Level of Service B generally occurs with good B progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles 0.601 to 0.700 stop than for Level of Service A, causing higher levels of average delay. Level of Service C generally results when there is fair C progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual 0.701 to 0.800 cycle failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. Level of Service D generally results in noticeable D congestion. Longer delays may result from some 0.801 to 0.900 combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high volume to capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. Level of Service E is considered to be the limit of E acceptable delay. These high delay values generally 0.901 to 1.000 Indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume to capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent. Level of Service F is considered to be unacceptable to F most drivers. This condition often occurs when 1.001 and up oversaturation, i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. it may also occur at high volume to capacity ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long - cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. auurce: rucinway caoacirV manuai Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council Washington D.C., 2000.