Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGP_UPDATE_TRAFFIC_STUDY_ALTERNATIVE_ANALYSIS*NEW FILE* GP -UPDATE -TRAFFIC -STUDY ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS Fb URBAN tRiOS$RQAQ'S 41 Corporate Park, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92606 Prepared by: Carleton Waters, P.E. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE ES.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................. ES-1 ES.1 GPAC Subarea Trip Generation Anaysis ES.2 Preliminary Alternatives 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY....................................................... 1-1 1.1 Goals and Objectives 1.2 Methodology Overview 1.2.1 Data and Analysis Methodology 2.0 MODEL TRIP GENERATION FOR GPAC SUBAREA LAND USE ALTERNATIVES........................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Trip Generation Rates and Adjustments 2.1.1 Coastal Trip Generation 2.1.2 Mixed Use Developments 2.1.3 High -Rise Apartments 2.2 Subarea Land Use Alternatives 2.2.1 Airport Area 2.2.2 Balboa Village 2.2.3 Banning Ranch 2.2.4 Cannery Village 2.2.5 Corona Del Mar 2.2.6 Lido Isle 2.2.7 Lido Village 2.2.8 Mariner's Mile 2.2.9 McFadden Square 2.2.10 Newport Center / Fashion Island 2.2.11 Old Newport Boulevard 2.2.12 West Newport Highway and Adjoining Residential 2.2.13 West Newport Industrial 2.3 Conclusions 3.0 CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (POST-2025) WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK SCENARIO ...................... 3-1 3.1 Land Use and Socioeconomic Data (SED) 3.1.1 Existing Land Use Data 3.1.2 General Plan Buildout Land Use Data 3.1.3 Existing Socioeconomic Data (SED) 3.1.4 General Plan Buildout Socioeconomic Data (SED) )i I 3.2 Trip Generation 3.3 Traffic Assignment 3.4 Daily Capacity Analysis ' 3.5 Peak Hour Forecasts 4.0 TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (POST-2025) ' ALTERNATIVE WITH OPEN SPACE NETWORK SCENARIO ...................... 4.1 Land Use and Socioeconomic Data (SED) ' 4.1.1 True Minimum General Plan Buildout Land Use Data 4.1.2 General Plan Buildout Socioeconomic Data (SED) 4.2 Trip Generation 4.3 Traffic Assignment 4.4 Daily Capacity Analysis 4.5 Peak Hour Forecasts 5.0 SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (POST-2025) ALTERNATIVE WITH OPEN SPACE NETWORK SCENARIO ...................... ' 5.1 Land Use and Socioeconomic Data (SED) 5.1.1 Subarea Minimum General Plan Buildout Land Use Data 5.1.2 General Plan Buildout Socioeconomic Data (SED) 5.2 Trip Generation 5.3 Traffic Assignment 5.4 Daily Capacity Analysis 5.5 Peak Hour Forecasts 6.0 SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (POST-2025) ' ALTERNATIVE WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK SCENARIO ................... 6.1 Land Use and Socioeconomic Data (SED) 6.1.1 Subarea Maximum General Plan Buildout Land Use Data 6.1.2 Subarea Maximum General Plan Buildout Socioeconomic Data (SED) ' 6.2 Trip Generation 6.3 Traffic Assignment 6.4 6.5 Daily Capacity Analysis Peak Hour Forecasts .' :1 4-1 5-1 6-1 1 I1 I1 :' APPENDICES MIXED USE TRIP GENERATION INFORMATION...................................................... EXISTINGLAND USE.................................................................................................... CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE .......................... CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CHANGE BY TAZ............. EXISTING TRIP GENERATION.................................................................................... CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT TRIP GENERATION .......... A B C D E F CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN TRIP GENERATION CHANGE BY TAZ........................................................................ G CONSTRAINED ROADWAY SYSTEM ASSUMPTIONS LETTER ............................... H CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS......... CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS WITHIMPROVEMENTS................................................................................................ TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE ........................................ K TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE CHANGE FROM CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BYTAZ......................................... L TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT TRIP GENERATION ......................... M TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT TRIP GENERATION CHANGE FROM CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BY TAZ ........................ N TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS.......................................................... 0 TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS WITH IMPROVEMENTS .................. P SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE .................................. Q SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE CHANGE FROM CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BY TAZ......................................... R ' SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT TRIP GENERATION ................... S ' SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT TRIP GENERATION CHANGE FROM CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BY TAZ ........................ T SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS ................................ U SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION ' CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS WITH IMPROVEMENTS .................... V ' SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE ................................ W SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE CHANGE FROM CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BY TAZ ........................ X SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT TRIP GENERATION .................. Y SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT TRIP GENERATION CHANGE FROM CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT BY TAZ........................................................................................................ Z SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS ............................ AA SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION t CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS WITH IMPROVEMENTS ................ BB 11 I� I1 I 1 u LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT PAGE 1-A INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATIONS ............................................ 1-5 3-A NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT CONSTRAINED THROUGH LANES ..................................................... 3-13 3-B CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT)......... 3-14 3-C GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIOS .................................. 3-24 3-D CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK DEFICIENCIES ............................. 3-33 4-A TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC(ADT)........................................................ 4-9 4-13 TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIOS ..................................................... 4-18 4-C TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE WITH OPEN SPACE NETWORK DEFICIENCIES................................................................... 4-27 5-A SUBAREA MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC(ADT)........................................................ 5-9 5-B SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIOS ..................................................... 5-18 5-C SUBAREA MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE WITH OPEN SPACE NETWORK DEFICIENCIES .......................................... 5-27 6-A SUBAREA MAXIMUM ALTERNATIVE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT).......................................................................... 6-9 6-B SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIOS ..................................................... 6-18 6-C SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK DEFICIENCIES ....................................... 6-27 LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE ES-1 RECOMMENDED OVERALL GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT ALTERNATIVES SUMMARY........................................................... ES-2 ES-2 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ..................................................... ES-3 ES-3 AM OVERALL CONSTRAINED IMPROVEMENTS ICU SUMMARY .................................................. ES-5 ES-4 PM OVERALL CONSTRAINED IMPROVEMENTS ICU SUMMARY .................................................. ES-8 ES-5 DEFICIENT INTERSECTION SUMMARY ...................................... ES-10 ES-6 OVERALL LOS SUMMARY............................................................. ES-11 1-1 ROADWAY SEGMENT CAPACITIES .................................................. 1-4 2-1 MODEL TRIP GENERATION RATES .................................................. 2-2 2-2 MODEL RESIDENTIAL TRIP GENERATION RATE REVIEW ................ 2-4 2-3 CONVERSION FACTORS BASED ON PM TOTAL ONLY ..................... 2-6 2-4 OVERALL MIXED USE CONVERSION FACTORS ................................. 2-8 2-5 ABSOLUTE WORST CASE CONVERSION FACTORS ......................... 2-9 2-6 APARTMENT TRIP GENERATION RATE COMPARISON ................... 2-10 2-7 AIRPORT AREA SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ............. 2-12 2-8 BALBOA VILLAGE SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY......... 2-13 2-9 BANNING RANCH SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY......... 2-15 2-10 CANNERY VILLAGE SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY...... 2-16 2-11 CORONA DEL MAR SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ...... 2-18 2-12 LIDO ISLE SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ...................... 2-19 2-13 LIDO VILLAGE SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ............... 2-21 11 2-14 MARINER'S MILE SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY.......... 2-23 2-15 MCFADDEN SQUARE SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY........................................................... 2-24 2-16 NEWPORT CENTER / FASHION ISLAND SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ......................................... 2-26 2-17 OLD NEWPORT BOULEVARD SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ......................................... 2-28 2-18 WEST NEWPORT HIGHWAY AND ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ......................................... 2-29 2-19 WEST NEWPORT INDUSTRIAL SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ......................................... 2-31 2-20 RECOMMENDED OVERALL GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT ALTERNATIVES SUMMARY .............................................. 2-32 2-21 OVERALL ALTERNATIVES SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ......................................... 2-33 3-1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH EXISTING LAND USE SUMMARY.......................................................................... 3-2 3-2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE COMPARISON ................................................ 3.4 3-3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE GROWTH FROM EXISTING ........................... 3-5 3-4 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH LAND USE BASED EXISTING SOCIOECONOMIC DATA SUMMARY ................................ 3-6 3-5 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH LAND USE BASED SOCIOECONOMIC DATA GROWTH FROM EXISTING ...................... 3-7 3-6 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH EXISTING TRIP GENERATION ............ 3-9 3-7 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TRIP GENERATION GROWTH ............. 3-10 3-8 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON.............................................................. 3-11 3-9 CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERALPLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON ......................................... 3-15 3-10 CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH................................................................... 3-19 3-11 CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO EXISTING............................................................... 3-27 3-12 GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO BASELINE.............................................................. 3-29 3-13 CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY.......................................................................... 3-31 3-14 CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) SUMMARY ......................................... 3-35 3-15 CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS............................................................ 3-37 4-1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE COMPARISON ...................................... 4-2 4-2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE GROWTH FROM EXISTING ................. 4-3 4-3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH LAND USE BASED SOCIOECONOMIC DATA SUMMARY / COMPARISON ...................... 4-5 4-4 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TRUE MINIMUM TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY........................................................... 4-6 4-5 CITY OFNEWPORT BEACH TRUE MINIMUM TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON..................................................... 4-7 4-6 TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON ......................................... 4-10 4-7 TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH ................................................. 4-14 4-8 TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN................................................................. 4-21 4-9 TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO EXISTING .............................. 4-23 4-10 TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY.......................................................................... 4-25 4-11 TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) SUMMARY............................................................ 4-29 4-12 TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE WITH OPEN SPACE NETWORK ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS............................................................ 4-31 5-1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE COMPARISON .................... 5-2 5-2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE GROWTH FROM EXISTING ................. 5-3 5-3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MINIMUM LAND USE BASED SOCIOECONOMIC DATA SUMMARY / COMPARISON�................................................................. 5-5 5-4 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MINIMUM TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY .............................................. :............ 5-6 5-5 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MINIMUM TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON..................................................... 5-7 5-6 SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON ......................................... 5-10 5-7 SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH ................................................. 5-14 5-8 SUBAREA MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTIONI CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN .......................................... 5-21 5-9 SUBAREA MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO EXISTING ........... 5-23 ' 5-10 SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY .............................................. 5-25 5-11 SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) SUMMARY ............. 5-29 1 5-12 SUBAREA MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS............................................................ 5-31 6-1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE COMPARISON .................... 6-2 6-2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE GROWTH FROM EXISTING ................. 6-3 ' 6-3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MAXIMUM LAND USE BASED SOCIOECONOMIC DATA SUMMARY/COMPARISON................................................................... 6-5 6-4 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MAXIMUM' ' TRIP GENERATION GROWTH FROM EXISTING ............................... 6-6 6-5 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MAXIMUM ' TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON..................................................... 6-7 6-6 SUBAREA MAXIMUM ALTERNATIVE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON........................................................... 6-10 6-7 SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH 6-14 ................................................. ' 6-8 SUBAREA MAXIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN .......................................... 6-21 6-9 SUBAREA MAXIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO EXISTING ........... 6-23 ' 6-10 SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY .............................................. 6-25 ' 6-11 SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) SUMMARY ............. 6-30 ' 6-12 SUBAREA MAXIMUM ALTERNATIVE ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS............................................................ 6-32 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN TRAFFIC STUDY PRELIMINARY GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ES.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report summarizes the preliminary buildout alternatives traffic analysis completed for the City of Newport Beach General Plan update. The initial analysis consists of individual GPAC subarea trip generation estimates for all GPAC subarea buildout alternatives. These have then been combined to form four city-wide preliminary land use buildout alternatives that have been evaluated on the basis of a constrained roadway network. The constrained roadway network eliminates improvements currently in the General Plan Circulation Element which either have no identified source of funding, or are questionable due to public controversy. ESA GPAC Subarea Trip Generation Analysis A total of 65 different trip generation calculations have been completed addressing all of the various GPAC land use alternatives for thirteen subareas considered by the GPAC. A fairly substantial range (>10,000 trips per day) in trip generation occurred for some subareas including the Airport Area, Banning Ranch, Newport Center, and West Newport Industrial areas. This resulted in the overall preliminary land use buildout alternatives summarized on Table ES-1. The overall alternatives are intended to range from a minimum trip generation to a maximum trip generation scenario including the currently adopted General Plan buildout as a benchmark. A "subarea minimum" alternative has also been developed that is based strictly on subarea options developed by GPAC that exclude the currently adopted General Plan. ES.2 Preliminary Alternatives The preliminary General Plan buildout alternatives resulted in a range of overall city-wide daily trip generation as shown on Table ES-2. All of the alternatives ' ES-1 TABLE ES4 RECOMMENDED OVERALL GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT ALTERNATIVES SUMMARY SUBAREA _ TRUE MINIMUM SUBAREA OPTIONS ONLY MINIMUM SUBAREA OPTIONS ONLY MAXIMUM Airport Area Adopted General Plan Option 2 Option 3 Balboa Village Option 3 Option 3 Option 4 Banning Ranch Option 1 Option 1 Option 2 Cannery Village TAZ 1449 Adopted General Plan Option 1 Option 1 Cannery Village TAZ 1454 Option 2 Option 2 Option 1 Corona Del Mar Option 2 Option 2 Option 1 Lido Isle option 1 Option 1 Adopted General Plan' Lido Village TAZ 1452 Adopted General Plan Option 3 Option 1 W rn Lido Village TAZ 1453 Adopted General Plan Option 1 Option 2 Mariner's Mile Adopted General Plan Option 1 or 2 Option 1 or 2 McFadden Square TAZ 1450 Adopted General Plan Option 1 Option 1 McFadden Square TAZ 1451 Adopted General Plan Option 1 Option 1 N Newport Center! Fashion Island Adopted General Plan Option 2 Option 1 Old Newport Boulevard Adopted General Plan [Option 2 O tion 1 West Newport Hi hwa ,and Ad'oinin -Residential O tion 16 O tion 16 O tion 5 West Newport -Industrial Option 3 1 Option 3 O tion-2 ' Only altematives considered are option 1 (existing densities) and currently adopted General Plan U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xls]ES-1 TABLE ES-2 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVE' i DAILY TRIP GENERATION EXISTING I ALTERNATIVE EXISTING %G EXISTING A(ADOPTED) 'a/off ADOPTED 1. CURRENTLY ADOPTED 687141 879,759 192,618 28.03% 0 0% 2. TRUE MINIMUM 687,,141 842,368 155,227 22.59% -37,391 -4% 3. SUBAREA MINIMUM 687,141 880,085 192;944 28.08% 326 0% 4. SUBAREA MAXIMUM 687,141 961,043 273,902 39.86% 81,284 9% 1 Alternative = General Plan buildout scenario. U:\Uof obs\_01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xls]ES-2 produce a trip generation growth of at least 20% for the City of Newport Beach. The highest increase (for the subarea maximum scenario) is almost 40%. Overall, the subarea minimum alternative trip generation is almost the same as for the currently adopted General Plan scenario. The true minimum (where "true" is added to better identify the difference from the "subarea" minimum alternative) alternative decreases daily trip -end generation by approximately 37,000 (a 4% reduction). The subarea maximum alternative increases trip generation by approximately 81,000 daily trip -ends. In many cases, any increase in trip generation includes strategies intended to improve the balance of residential and non-residential uses (for instance, adding housing in the Airport Area or encouraging mixed use development) in ways that can actually reduce traffic congestion. The latest version (December 2003) of the Newport Beach Traffic Model (NBTM) has been used to evaluate each of the preliminary alternatives. Daily traffic volumes for each alternative are discussed in the main body of the report. In general, daily traffic volumes change by 1,000 vehicles per day (VPD) or less on most roadways, Volumes on certain key roadways (such as Coast Highway, Newport Boulevard, etc.) changed by as much as 7,000 VPD. Table ES-3 summarizes the resulting intersection AM peak hour levels of service assuming constrained roadway improvements for all scenarios. The constrained network eliminates improvements currently in the General Plan Circulation Element which either have no identified source of funding,, or are questionable due to public controversy. This differs from the previously published baseline data, which included all roadway improvements included in the General Plan Circulation Element. Key constraints reflected in the analysis include: • No extension of SR-55 • No widening of Coast Highway through Mariner's Mile 11 11 it ,I ES-4 TABLE ES-3 (PAGE 1 OF 2) AM OVERALL CONSTRAINED IMPROVEMENTS ICU SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS/EW CURRENTLY ADOPTED TRUE MINIMUM SUBAREA MINIMUM SUBAREA MAXIMUM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU I LOS ICU I LOS 1. Bluff Rd. & Coast Hw. 1.27 F DNE DNE DNE DNE 1.28 F 2. Superior Av. & Placentia Av. 0.72 C 0.74 C 0.73 C 0.72 C 3. Superior Av. & Coast Hw. 1.01 F 0.98 E 1.00 E 1.03 F 4. Newport BI. & Hospital Rd. 0.79 C 0.79 C 0.84 D 0.93 E 5. Newport BI. & Via Lido 0.54 A 0.52 A 0.55 A 0.60 A 6. Newport BI. & 32nd St. 0.52 A 0.47 A 0.48 A 0.57 A 7. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. 1.03 F 1.01 F 1.02 F 1.04 F 8. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. 1.02 F 1.01 Fl 1.041 F 1.061 F 9. MacArthur BI. & Campus Dr. 0.76 C 0.75 C 0.77 C 0.81 D 10. MacArthur BI. & Birch St. 0.71 C 0.70 B 0.75 C 0.79 C 11. Von Karman Av. & Campus Dr. 0.66 B 0.64 B 0.69 B 0.74 C 12. MacArthur BI. & Von Karman Av. 0.54 A 0.54 A 0.51 A 0.52 A 13. Jamboree Rd. & Campus Dr. 0.92 E 0.93 E 0.93 E 0.98 E 14. Jamboree Rd. & Birch St. 0.79 C 0.80 C 0.81 D 0.87 D 15. Campus Dr. & Bristol St. N 0.961 E 0.96 E 0.97 E 1.00 E 16. Birch St. & Bristol St. N 0.92 E 0.93 El 0.92 E 0.911 E 17. Campus Dr./Irvine Av. & Bristol St. S 0.93 E 0.91 E 0.93 E 0.931 E 18. Birch St. & Bristol St. S 0.52 A 0.52 A 0.54 A 0.53 A 19. Irvine Av. & Mesa Dr. 0.68 B 0.68 B 0.70 B 0.73 C 20. Irvine Av. & University Dr. 1.14 F 1.15 F 1.15 F 1.14 F 21. Irvine Av. & Santiago Dr. 0.70 B 0.69 B 0.70 B 0.71 C 22. Irvine Av. & Highland Dr. 0.61 B 0.61 B 0.62 B 0.63 B 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 0.78 C 0.78 C 0.79 C 0.82 D 24. Irvine Av. & Westcliff Dr. 0.67 B 0.66 B1 0.69 B 0.70 B 25. Dover Dr. & Westcliff Dr. 0.39 A 0.40 A 0.40 A 0.411 A 26. Dover Dr. & 16th St. 0.64 B 0.64 B 0.64 B 0.64 B 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.86 D 0.84 D 0.87 D 0.89 D 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.83 D 0.82 D 0.83 D 0.84 D 29. MacArthur BI. & Jamboree Rd. 0.96 E 0.97 E 0.96 E 0.96 E 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. N 0.70 B 0.71 C 0.71 C 0.69 B 31. Bayview PI. & Bristol St. S 0.60 A 0.59 A 0.61 B 0.61 B 32. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. S 0.96 E 0.97 E 0.97 E 0.94 E 33. Jamboree Rd. & Bayvlew W . 0.48 A 0.48 A 0.48 A 0.48 A 34. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbiuff Dr. /University Dr. 0.64 B 0.65 B 0.66 B 0.65 B 35. Jamboree Rd. & Bison Av. 0.51 A 0.50 A 0.51 A 0.52 A 36. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr./Ford Rd. 0.781 Cl0.76 C 0.79 C 0.81 D 37. Jamboree Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.61 B 0.60 A 0.60 A 0.64 B 38. Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbara Dr. 0.55 A 0.54 A 0.58 A 0.69 B 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.85 D 0.85 D 0.87 D 0.88 D 40. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.36 A 0.34 A 0.38 A 0.39 A 41. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.39 A 0.39 A 0.39 A 0.43 A 42. New ort Center Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.50 A 0.50 A 0.50 A 0.55 A 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.37 A 0.38 A 0.39 A 0.43 A 45. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 1 0.771 Cl0.78 C 0.801 C 0.81 D11 ES-5 TABLE ES-3 (PAGE 2 OF 2) ' AM OVERALL CONSTRAINED IMPROVEMENTS ICU SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS/EW CURRENTLY ADOPTED TRUE I MINIMUM SUBAREA MINIMUM SUBAREA MAXIMUM ICU I LOS I ICU I LOS I ICU I LOS I ICU I LOS 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.47 A 0.47 A 0.47 A 0.47 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.38 A 0.39 A 0.38 A 0.38 A 48. MacArthur BI. &Bison Av. 0.78 C 0.77 C 0.79 C 0.81 D 49. MacArthur BI. & Ford Rd./Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.77 C 0.77 C 0.78 C 0.79 C 50. MacArthur BI. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.77 C 0.77 C 0.81 D 0.83 D 51. MacArthur Bi. & San Miguel Dr. 0.63 B 0.62 B 0.63 B 0.71 C 52. MacArthur BI. & Coast Hw. 0.74 C 0.74 C 0.73 Cl0.74 C 53. SR-73 NB Ram s & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.69 B 0.691 Bi 0.69 B 0.72 C 54. SR-73 SB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.45 A 0.45 Al0.46 A 0.46 55. San Miguel Dr. & Spyglass Hill Rd. 0.30 A . 0.30 A 0.30 A 0.31 A 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd. & San Miguel Dr. 0.52 A 0.51 A 0.55 A 0.64 A 57. Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw. 1.08 F 1.06 F 1.06 F 1.08 F 58. Marguerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.3B A 0.38 A 0.38 A 0.39 A 59.Mar uerite Av. & Coast Hw, 0.90 D 0.88 D 0.89 D 0.90 D 60. Spyglass Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.60 A 0.59 A 0.601 A 0.62 B 61. Poppy Av. & Coast Hw. 0.67 B 1 0.68 B 0.671 B 0.68 B 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Rams 0.54 A 0.54 A 0.53 A 0.55 A 64. Newport Coast Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.63 B 0.63 B 0.63 B 0.66 B 65. Newport Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.57 AlOZ71 Al0.561 A 0.57 A U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xis]ES-3 ES-6 • No extension of 19th Street across the Santa Ana River • No widening of Jamboree Road north of Ford Road In general, most intersections experience a maximum change of 1 level of service (LOS), for instance from LOS "C" to LOS "D". A few intersections (Newport Boulevard at Hospital Road, for example) experience a greater range (LOS "C" to LOS "E" for the example cited). Table ES-4 provides a similar summary for the PM peak hour. Table ES-5 highlights those intersections projected to experience deficient operations. From Table ES-5, individual intersection performance across scenarios can be evaluated for the key intersections where deficient operations are anticipated for 1 or more of the preliminary alternatives. For instance, the intersections where the true minimum alternative results in improved levels of service compared to the adopted General Plan are Superior Avenue (NS) at Coast Highway (EW) and Marguerite Avenue (NS) at Coast Highway (EW). Table ES-6 provides an overview of the number and percentage of intersections experiencing each level of service by time of day (AM/PM) and overall (AM+PM). The subarea maximum alternative experiences the most overall deficiencies (34) and the true minimum alternative experiences fewer deficiencies (24) than the remaining two alternatives, which experience an equal number of deficiencies (26). Improvements have been developed that provide acceptable operations at all potentially deficient intersections (outlined within the body of the report). The feasibility of the necessary improvements is questionable at some locations (particularly where additional through lanes are necessary). ES-7 1� TABLE ES-4 (PAGE 1 OF 2) ' PM OVERALL CONSTRAINED IMPROVEMENTS IOU SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS/EW CURRENTLY ADOPTED TRUE MINIMUM I SUBAREA MINIMUM SUBAREA MAXIMUM ICU I LOS I ICU I LOS I ICU I LOS I ICU I LOS 1. Bluff Rd. & Coast Hw. 1.29 F DNE ONE DNEI ONE 1.28 F 2. Superior Av. & Placentia Av. 0.82 D 0:86 D 0.861 D 0.83 D 3. Superior Av. & Coast"Hw. 0.99 E 0.94 E 0.95 E 1.04 F 4. Newport BI. & Hospital Rd. 0.97 E 0.96 E 1.01 F 1.18 F 5. Newport BI. & Via Lido 0.46 A 0.41 A 0.45 A 0.52 A 6. Newport BI. & 32nd St. 0.71 C 0.58 A 0.63 B 0.81 D 7. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. 1.12 F 1.10 F 1.15 FI 1.19 F 8. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. 0,851 D 0.83 D 0.87 D 0.92 E 9. MacArthur BI.'& Campus Dr. 1.251 F 1.25 F 1.29 F 1.29 F 10. MacArthur BI. & Birch St. 0:80 C 0.80 C 0.86 D 0.86 D 11. Von Karman Av. & Campus Dr. 0.93 E 0.94 E 0.98 E 1.02 F 12. MacArthur BI. & Von Karman Av. 0,64 B 0.64 8 0.64 B 0.65 B 13. Jamboree Rd. & Campus Dr. 1.24 F 1.23 F 1.25 F 1.25 F 14. Jamboree Rd. & Birch St. 0.80 cl 0.80 C 0.80 C 0.81 D 15. Campus Dr. & Bristol St. N 1.08 F 1.08 F 1.08 F 1.08 F 16. Birch St. & Bristol St. N 0.72 C 0.72 C 0.73 C 0.72 C 17. Campus DrArvine Av. & Bristol St. S 0.77 C 0.76 Cl0.78 C 0.77 C 18. Birch St. & Bristol St. S 0.53 A 0.53 A 0,54 A 0.54 19. Irvine Av. & Mesa Dr. 0.90 D 0.90 D 0.91 El 0.941 E 20. Irvine Av. & University Dr. 1.19 F 1.16 F 1.17 F 1.18 F 21. Irvine Av. &'Santia o Dr. 0.78 C 0.76 C 0.78 C 0.77 C 22. Irvine Av. & Highland Dr. 0,63 B 0.63 B 0.65 B 0.66 B 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 0.70 B 0.71 C 0.72 C 0.72 C 24. Irvine Av. & Westcliff Dr. 0.821 DI 0.80 C 0.80 C 0.83 D 25. Dover Dr. & Westcliff Dr. 0.56 A 0.57 Al0.58 A 0.59 A 26. Dover Dr. & 16th St. 0.64 BI 0.65 B 0.65 B 0.64 B 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.90 D 0:88 D 0.91 El 0.941 E 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.94 E 0.93 E 0.95 E 0.98 E 29. MacArthur BI. & Jamboree Rd. 0.99 E 0.99 E 1.00 E 1.08 F 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. N 0.69 B 0.68 B 0.69 8 0.72 C 31. BayvieW PI. & Bristol St. S 0.63 B 0.63 B 0.63 B 0.64 B 32. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. S 0:85 D 0.84 D 0.86 D 0.87 D 33. Jamboree Rd. & Bayvlew W . 0.70 B 0.70 B 0.71 C 0.71 C 34. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr. /University Dr. 0.6911 B 0.6B B 0,70 B 0.71 C 35. Jamboree Rd. & Bison Av, 0.58 A 0.58 Al0.591 A 0.621 B 36. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr./Ford Rd. 0.72 C 0.73 C 0.731 C 0.76 C 37. Jamboree Rd. & San Joa Uin Hills Rd. 0.65 B 0.65 B 0.68 B 0.71 C 38. Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbara Dr. 0.71 C 0.71 C 0.78 C 0.87 D 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.89 D 0.87 D 0.86 D 0.91 E 40. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.34 A 0.34 A 0.36 A 0.36 A 41. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.71 C 0.70 B 0.68 B 0.73 C 42. New ort Center Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.63 B 0.62 B 0.62 B 0.66 B 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.79 C 0.781 Cl0.79 Cl0.841 D 45. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.801 Cl0.791 Cl0.83 O 0.83 D i2m TABLE ES-4 (PAGE 2 OF 2) PM OVERALL CONSTRAINED IMPROVEMENTS ICU SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS/EW CURRENTLY ADOPTED TRUE MINIMUM SUBAREA MINIMUM SUBAREA MAXIMUM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.56 A 0.56 A 0.56 A 0.56 A 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.29 A 0.29 A 0.29 A 0.29 A 48. MacArthur Bl. & Bison Av. 0.80 C 0.80 C 0.81 D 0.81 D 49. MacArhtur Bl. & Ford Rd./Bonita Canyon Dr. 1.06 F 1.06 F 1.06 F 1.09 F 50. MacArthur Bl. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 1.04 F 1.02 F 1.06 F 1.08 F 51. MacArthur Bl. & San Miguel Dr. 0.77 C 0.76 C 0.76 C 0.80 C 52. MacArthur Bl. & Coast Hw. 0.83 D 0.80 C 0.79 C 0.81 D 53. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.531 A 0.521 Al0.53 Al0.541 A 54. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.59 ' A 0.57 Al0.59 A 0.601 A 55. San Miguel Dr. & Spyglass Hill Rd. 0.38 A 0.38 A 0.38 A 0.39 A 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd. & San Miguel Dr. 0.68 B 0.68 B 0.68 B 0.71 C 57. Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw. 0.79 C 0.75 C 0.75 C 0.77 C 58. Marguerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.51 A 0.49 A 0.50 A 0.53 A 59.Mar uerite Av. & Coast Hw. 0.91 E 0.90 D 0.92 E 0.91 E 60. Spyglass Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.46 A 0.45 A 0.46 A 0.50 A 61. Poppy Av. & Coast Hw. 0.761 C 0.75 C 0.75 C 0.74 C 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Rams 0.40 A Al0.40 A 0.41 A 64. Newport Coast Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.47 A q46 Al0.46 A 0.51 A 65. Newport Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.60 A Al0.601 Al0.611 1311 U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excei\[01232-18.xis]ES-4 11 1 ES-9 J TABLE ES-5 DEFICIENT INTERSECTION SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS/EW CURRENTLY ADOPTED TRUE MINIMUM SUBAREA MINIMUM SUBAREA MAXIMUM AM PM AM I PM AM I PM AM I PM 1. Bluff Rd. & Coast Hw. F F DNE DNE DNE DNE F F 3. Superior Av. & Coast Hw. F E E E E E F F 4. Newport Bi. & Hospital Rd. C E C E D F E F 7. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. F F F F F F F F B. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. F D F D F D F E 9. MacArthur BI. & Campus Dr. C F C F C F D F 11. Voh Karnian Av. & Campus Dr. B E B E B E C F 13. Jamboree Rd. & Campus Dr. El F1 E FI El F El F 15. Campus Dr. & Bristol St. N El F1 E F E F E F 16. Birch,St. & Bristol St. N El ClE C E C E C 17, Campus DrArvine Av. & Bristol St. S E C E C E C E C 19. Irvine Av. & Mesa Dr. B D B D B E C E 20. Irvine Av. & University Dr. F F F F F F F F 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. D D D D D E D E 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. D E D E D E D E 29. MacArthur BI. & Jamboree Rd, E E E El E E E F 32, Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. S E D E D E D E D 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. DI DI D D D D D E 49. MacArthur BI. & Ford Rd./Bonita Canyon Dr. C F C F C F C F 50. MacArthur BI. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. C F C F D F D F 57. Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw. F C F C F C F C 59.Mar uerite Av. & Coast Hw, D E D D D E D E U:\Uciobs\—Ol 2001012321Excell[01232-18,xls]ES-5 iI ES-10 m m m m m m m m m= m m = m tzj TABLE ES-6 OVERALL LOS SUMMARY NUMBER OF LOCATIONS AM PM TOTAL LOS CURRENTLY ADOPTED TRUE MINIMUM IS MINIMUM SUBAREA MAXIMUM CURRENTLY ADOPTED TRUE MINIMUM SUBAREA MINIMUM SUBAREA MAXIMUM CURRENTLY ADOPTED TRUE MINIMUM SUBAREA MINIMUM SUBAREA MAXIMUM A 22 23 22 19 15 16 15 13 37 39 37 32 B 13 12 12 11 11 11 11 7 24 23 23 18 C 12 12 11 9 15 16 14 14 27 28 25 23 D 4 4 6 11 8 7 7 11 12 11 13 22 oa Acceptable 51 51 51 50 49 50 47 45 100 101 98 95 E 6 7 7 7 6 5 7 6 12 12 14 13 F 61 4 4 6 8 71 8 121 14 11 12 18 oa Deficient 12 11 11 13 14 12 15 18 26 23 26 31 TOTAL 1 631 621 62 63 63 621 621 631 1261 1241 1241 12611 PERCENT OF LOCATIONS AM PM TOTAL LOS CURRENTLY ADOPTED TRUE MINIMUM SUBAREA MINIMUM SUBAREA MAXIMUM CURRENTLY ADOPTED TRUE MINIMUM SUBAREA MINIMUM SUBAREA MAXIMUM CURRENTLY ADOPTED TRUE MINIMUM SUBAREA MINIMUM SUBAREA MAXIMUM A 34.92% 37.10% 35.48% 30.16% 23.81% 25.81% 24.19% 20.63% 29.37% 31.45% 29.84% 25.40% B 20.63% 19.35% 19.35% 17.46% 17A6% 17.74% 17.74% 11.11% 19.05% 18.55% 18.55% 14.29% C 19.05% 19.35% 17.74% 14.29% 23.81% 25.81% 22.58% 22.22% 21.43% 22.58% 20.16% 18.25% D 6.35% 6.45% 9.68% 17.46% 12.70% _ 11.29% 11.29% 17.46% 9.52% 8.87% 10.48% 17.46% ca Acceptable 80.95% 82.26% 82.26% 79.37% 77.78% 80.65% 75.81% 71.43% 79.37% 81A5% 79.03% 75.40% E 9.52% 11.29% 11.29% 11.11% 9.52% 8.06% 11.29% 9.52% 9.52% 9.68% 11.29% 10.32% F 9.52% 6.45% 6.45% 9.52% 12.70% 11.29% 12.90% 19.05% 11.11% 8.87% 9.68% 14.29% oa Deficient 19.05% 17.74% 17.74% 20.63% 22.22% 19.35% 24.19% 28:57% 20.63% 18.55% 20.97°/a 24.60% TOTAL 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excefl[01232-18.x1s]ES-6 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ES-12 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY This report has been prepared in support of the update of the City of Newport Beach General Plan and Circulation Element. This report documents the preliminary General Plan buildout alternatives analysis. This report is intended to supplement the City of Newport Beach General Plan Traffic Study Baseline Data and Analysis (Urban Crossroads, December 5, 2003), and may refer to data and procedures contained therein. This chapter of the report introduces the reader to the preliminary General Plan buildout alternatives analysis portion of the City of Newport Beach General Plan Circulation Element update project and presents the goals and objectives of the work effort. The General Plan forecasts have been prepared using the Newport Beach Traffic Model, version 3.1 (NBTM 3.1). For detailed discussion of the model, see Newport Beach Traffic Model (NBTM) 3.1 Technical Documentation Report (Urban Crossroads, Inc., December, 2003). The NBTM 3.1 travel demand forecasting tool has been developed for the City of Newport Beach to identify traffic and circulation issues in and around the City. The NBTM 3.1 tool has been developed in accordance with the requirements and recommendations of the Orange County Subarea Modeling Guidelines Manual (August, 1998) and has been found by the Orange County Transportation Authority to be consistent with these guidelines. The NBTM 3.1 is intended to be used for roadway planning and traffic impact analyses, such as: General Plan/Land Use analysis required by the City of Newport Beach. • Amendments to the Orange County Master Plamof Arterial Highways (MPAH). • Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP) analysis. The NBTM 3.1 is a vehicle trip based modeling tool, and it is intended for evaluating general roadway system supply and demand problems and issues. The NBTM 3.1 has been specifically calibrated to represent "shoulder season" (spring/fall) conditions in the City of Newport Beach. 1-1 1.1 1.2 Goals and Objectives The goals of the General Plan Update preliminary alternatives analysis are to analyze future General Plan buildout altemative daily and peak hour volume forecasts and provide comparisons of the four buildout alternatives selected for analysis. Methodology Overview This section provides a broad overview of the analysis methodology. 1.2.1 Data and Analysis Methodology The City of Newport Beach has a circulation system consisting of arterial roadways and local streets. State Route (SR-) 55, SR-73and Highway 1 (Coast Highway) provide regional access to the City. Established transit service also connects the City to nearby communities. A bicycle and pedestrain system is also in place. For vehicular transportation, a hierarchal roadway network is established with designated roadway types and design standards. The roadway type is linked to anticipated traffic levels. As growth within the City occurs, capacity analysis should be performed and improvements made to the roadway system. Because local circulation is linked with the regional system, the Circulation Element also focuses on, participation in regional programs to alleviate traffic congestion, and construct capacity improvements. Plans prepared by Caltrans, the County and other regional agencies guide developmenttimprovement of the regional transportation system. Strategies to handle anticipated traffic levels from future regional development are currently being developed as discussed hereafter. 4 Existing conditions data has been collected by field verification. Analysts have identified existing roadway network characteristics, and vehicles have been counted at locations throughout the study area. Existing conditions land use data has been provided by City of Newport Beach staff. The existing land use data is combined with the existing roadway system in the Newport Beach Traffic Model (NBTM) development validation scenario. Minor adjustments have been made to the existing input data to retain ' consistency with buildout conditions. ' Future land use and roadway data has been provided by City of Newport Beach staff and the City's planning consultant, EIP Associates. Raw ' forecasts from the General Plan Buildout scenario of the NBTM have been refined using existing count data and validation model results. Daily roadway segment analysis (including freeways) requires calculating ' the daily traffic volume divided by the roadway segment capacity. The City of Newport Beach daily roadway capacities used in this analysis are ' presented in Table 1-1. For analysis purposes, the upper end of the approximate daily capacity range has been used. ' The daily capacity of a roadway correlates to a number of widely varying factors, including traffic peaking characteristics, traffic turning volumes, and the volume of traffic on crossing streets. The daily capacities are therefore ' most appropriately used for long range General Plan analysis, or as a screening tool to determine the need for more detailed peak hour analysis. ' Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) analysis has been performed at sixty- three (63) study area intersections (see Exhibit 1-A). ICU values are used to determine levels of service at study area intersection locations. To calculate ' the ICU value for an intersection, the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared with the capacity of the intersection. The ICU is usually 1-3 TABLE 1.1 ROADWAY SEGMENT CAPACITIES' CLASSIFICATION RIGHT-OF-WAY CURB Tb CURB WIDTH I # OF LANES MEDIAN WIDTH APPROXIMATE DAILY CAPACITY 8 Lane Divided 158 Variable 8 14-18 60-68,000 Ma'orAu mented Variable Variable 6-8 Variable 52-58,000 Major 128-134 106-114 6 14-18 45-51 000 Primary Augmented Variable Variable 4-6 Variable 35.40,000 Prima 104-10B 84 4 16-20 30-34,000 Seconds 84 64 4 0 20-23,000 Commuter 60.70 40.50 2 0 7.10,000 Couplets: Secondary couplet - 2 lanes for each leg Primary couplet- 3 lanes for each leg Major couplet - 4 lanes for each leg NOTE: Daily capacity of a roadway correlates to a number of widely varying factors, including traffic peaking characteristics, traffic turning volumes, and the volume of traffic on crossing streets. The daily capacities are therefore most appropriately used for long range General Plan analysis, or as a screening tool to determine the need for more detailed peak hour analysis. U:1UcJobsV 012001012321Excelu01232-18As]T1-1 UZ11 In m EXHIBIT 1-A INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATIONS expressed as a decimal percent (e:g., 0.86). The decimal percent ' represents that portion of the hour required to provide sufficient capacity to accommodate all intersection traffic if all' approaches operate at capacity. ' I u 1 11 11 iI I 1-6 1 2.0 MODEL TRIP GENERATION FOR GPAC SUBAREA LAND USE ALTERNATIVES This chapter documents trip generation for the subarea land use buildout alternatives identified by the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC). Full analysis with the traffic model has been run on four comprehensive alternatives derived from the subarea data and overall City-wide data for the remainder of the City. Thirteen subarea land use tables were provided to Urban Crossroads, Inc. staff. Each table contains land use data quantities and comparisons for each option being considered for the subarea, as well as for the currently adopted General Plan. Several of the subareas are further segmented into individual Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) or even blocks. In some cases, the TAZ is larger than the study area. A total of 67 discrete alternatives have been evaluated. Urban Crossroads, Inc. staff has performed calculations on each subarea (or TAZ or block) to determine the approximate trip generation from the Newport Beach Traffic Model (NBTM). A separate sketch planning tool has been developed specifically for this task. Daily and peak hour trips have been computed. The resulting trip generation is used to determine the minimum and maximum intensity alternative from a traffic standpoint. The identification of minimum and maximum land use alternatives is based on the PM peak hour, as the PM peak hour is the timeframe in which the highest number of operational deficiencies has been identified under the currently adopted General Plan. 2.1 Trip Generation Rates and Adiustments This section provides information on trip generation issues (including adjustments to some standard/typical rates). Coastal trip generation for residential land use is compared with general residential trip generation by type. Mixed use trip rate refinements are discussed. High-rise apartments trip generation rates are evaluated in comparison to typical apartments. Overall model trip generation rates are included as Table 2-1. These are typical trip rate calculations which change slightly based on changes in input variables such as median income. These rates have been derived from the NBTM and underlying 2-1 TABLE 2.1 MODEL TRIP GENERATION RATES NBTM LAND USE CODE NBTM LAND USE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS TRIP RATE AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL DAILY 1 Res -Low SFD -Coastal 1 DU 0.19 0.50 0.69 0.41 0.27 0.69 7.50 1 Res -Low SFD 1 DU 0.21 0.64 0.84 0.49 1 0.30 0.79 8.63 2 Res -Medium (SFA)-Coastal 1 DU 0.12 0.41 0.53 0.32 0.19 0.52 5.64 2 Res -Medium (SFA) 1 DU 0.13 0.55 0.68 0.40 0.21 0.61 6.66 3 A artnient-Coastal 1 DU 0.11 038 0.49 0.31 0.19 0.49 5.37 3 1 DU 0.12 0.48 0.60 0.36 0.20 0.56 6.12 _Apartment 4 Elderly Residential 1 DU 0.11 0.29 0.40 '0.27 0.18 0.45 4.90 5 Mobile Home -Coastal 1 DU 0.10 1 0.34 0.44 0.29 0.18 0.46 5.06 5 Mobile Home 1 DU 0.11 0.45 0.56 0.34 0.20 0.54 5.92 6 Motel 1 ROOM 0.40 0.13 0.53 1 0.23 1 0.34 0.57 6.08 7 Hotel 1 ROOM 0.51 0.17 0.66 1 0.28 1 0.43 0.71 1 7.58 9 Regional Commercial 1' TSF 1.14 0.49 1.641 0.93 1 1.25 2.18 23A8 10 General Commercial 1 TSF 1.78 0.80 2.59 1.53 2.02 3.55 38.24 11 Comm./Recreation 1 ACRE 2.12 0.80 2.92 1.42 2.04 3.46 37.07 13 Restaurant 1 TSF 2.39 1.07 3.46 2.05 2.70 4.75 51.18 15 Fast Food Restaurant 1 TSF 2.94 1 1.32 4.25 2.51 3.32 5.83 62.78 16 Auto Dealer/Sales 1 TSF 1.74 0.74 2.48 1.38 1.86 3.24 34.84 17 Yacht Club 1 TSF 1.30 0.49 1.79 0.87 1.25 2.12 22.71 18 Health Club 1 TSF 1.30 0.49 1.79 0,87 1.25 2.121 22.71 19 Tennis Club 1 CRT 1.36 0.54 1.89 1 0.98 1 1.37 2.351 25.26 20 Marina 1 SLIP 0.12 0.05 0.17 0.09 0.13 O:22 2.39 21 Theater 1 SEAT 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.34 22 Newport Dunes 1 ACRE 0.96 0.42 1.39 0.80 1.06 1.86 20.02 23 General Office 1 TSF 0.84 0.26 1.10 0.39 0.65 1.04 11.08 24 Medical/Government Office 1 TSF 1.14 0.39 1.53 0164 0.98 1.63 17.38 25 R & D 1 TSF 0,57 0.17 0.74 0.25 0,42 0.67 7.10 26 Industrial 1 TSF 0.48 0.13 0.62 0.18 0.33 0:52 5A8 27 Mini-,Stora eMarehouse 1 TSF 0.40 0.11 0.51 0.16 0.28 0.43 1 4.61 28 Pre-School/Day Care 1 TSF 2.08 0.65 2.73 1.04 1.68 2.72 29.05 29 Elementary/Private School 1 STU 0.18 0.02 0.20 0.04 0.07 0.11 1.30 30 Junior/High School 1 STU 0.18 0.02 0.20 0.04 0.07 0.11 1.30 31 Cultural/Learning Center 1 TSF 1.13 0.35 1.48 0.54 0.89 1.43 15.22 32 Llbr6ry 1 TSF 1.13 1 0.35 1.48 ' 0.54 0.89 1.43 15.22 33 Post Office 1 TSF 1.54 1 0.49 2.03 0.78 1.25 2.03 21.63 34 Hospital 1 BEDS 1.10 0.32 1.42 0.47 0.80 1.27 13.57 35 Nursing/Cony. Home 1 BEDS 1 0.12 0.08 0.20 0.08 0.10 0.18 2.00 36 Church 1 TSF 0.48 0.14 0,62 0.21 0.36 0.57 6.09 37 Youth Ctr/Service 1 TSF 2.08 0.65 2.73 1.04 1.68 2.72 29.05 38 Park 1 ACRE 0.18 0.06 0.23 0.09 0.14 0.23 2.49 39 Regional Park 1 ACRE 0.18 0.06 0.23 0.09 1 .14 0.23 2.49 40 Golf Course 1 ACRE 0.27 0.10 0.37 0.17 0.25 0.42 4.55 41 Resort Golf Course 1 ACRE 0.27 0.10 1 0.371 0.17 0.25 OALL 4.55 U:1UcJobsl 01200101232\Excell[01232-18.xls]T2-1 1 1 2-2 1 I 11 I subregional model data (i.e. these rates closely represent actual model trip generation). 2.1.1 Coastal Trip Generation As the Newport Beach Traffic Model (NBTM) was developed, Urban Crossroads, Inc. staff determined (during model validation) that the traffic patterns/trip generation rates in the coastal areas were different from elsewhere in the City of Newport Beach. The existing traffic model volumes were higher in the coastal areas than the count data. Occupancy factors and trip rates were developed for residential uses in the coastal areas during the validation process. The shoulder season (spring/fall) occupancy rate for typical City of Newport Beach residential uses is 95%. For Coastal areas, the occupancy rate is 90%. Trip generation rates from the model have been provided as part of Table 2-2. The trip rates in Table 2-2 include the occupancy factor. For total AM, total PM, and Daily trip rates, 'the trip generation range in Coastal areas is between 79% and 88% of typical residential trip rates. The PM peak hour is the timeframe in which the highest number of operational deficiencies has been identified, and in the PM peak hour, the coastal trip rates are between 85% and 87% of typical trip rates. 2.1.2 Mixed Use Developments Mixed use trip generation information and research compiled by Urban Crossroads, Inc. has been included as Appendix "A". Information has been gathered from sampling done by ITE and documented in Trr1 Generation, 5t' Edition (ITE, 1991). More recent versions of ITE's Trip Generation do not include information on mixed use sites. There are two examples of mixed use developments containing residential uses in the 5th Edition. Internal capture (the proportion of traffic that would typically be generated, then distributed to the surrounding system that is instead served on -site as a result of the land use mix) has been identified. W, TABLE 2-2, MODEL RESIDENTIAL TRIP GENERATION RATE REVIEW NBTM LAND USE CODE I NBTM LAND USE DESCRIPTION UNITS TRIP RATE AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL, DAILY 1 Res -Low SFD -Coastal DU 0.19 0.50 0.69 0.41 0.27 0.69 7.50 1 Res -Low SFD DU 0.21 0.64 0.84 0.49 0.30 0.79 8.63 Res -Low (SFD) Ratio 0.92 0.78 0.81 0.84 0.91 0.87 U7 2 Res -Medium (SFA)-Coastal DU 0.12 0.41 0.53 0.32 0.19 0.52 5.64 2 Res -Medium (SFA) DU 0.13 0.55 0.68 0.40 0.21 0.61 6.66 Res -Medium SFA) Ratio 0.90 0.75 0,78 0.82 0.90 0.85 0.85 3 Apartment -Coastal DU 0.11 0.38 0.49 0.31 0.19 0.49 5.37 3 Apartment DU 0.12 OA8 0.60 0.36 0.20 0.56 6.12 Apartment Ratio 0.92 0.78 0.81 0.85 0,92 0.87 0.88 4 Elderly Residential DU 0.11 0.29 0.40 0.27 0.18 OA5 4.90 5 Mobile Home -Coastal DU 0.10 , 0.34 0.44 0.29 0.18 0.46 5.06 5 Mobile Home DU 0.11 0.45 0.56 0.34' 0.20 0.54 5.92 Mobile Home Ratio 0.90 0.76 0.79 1 0,83 1 0.89 1 0,85 0.85 U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xis]T2-2 2-4 The first example contains 606 dwelling units and 64,000 square feet of commercial/office. The internal capture rates are 27% for the PM peak hour and 17% for the daily. The second example is for a larger site, with 2,300 dwelling units and over 160 thousand square feet of total commercial, office, restaurant, and medical center uses. This site also includes schools, a church, and a day- care center. The internal capture for this site is substantially higher (45% or more for all time periods). An additional data resource was the Santa Monica Civic Center study. The Santa Monica Civic Center study included a 50% reduction for the retail component, but no reduction was done on other uses. The net result in the analysis was an overall reduction of approximately 10% A final data resource consulted was the San Diego Association of Governments trip generation handbook. The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) trip generation handbook suggests up to a 10% reduction. Based on the examples cited, an adjustment factor of 10% of traffic for mixed uses will provide a conservative representation of trip generation. The factor is applied in cases where the land use has been defined as mixed use development. Where both the mixed use and coastal factors are applicable, only one is applied to avoid overstating trip generation benefits. Later sections of this report will discuss individual sub -area land use representation. To assist with land use planning refinements in mixed use areas, conversion factors have been developed from the rates presented in Table 2-1. Table 2-3 contains the results of this analysis for the PM peak period. As shown in Table 2-3, for the PM peak hour, a reduction of one single- family detached residence allows 220 square feet of commercial without 2-5 11 TABLE 2.3 CONVERSION FACTORS BASED ON PM TOTAL ONLY STARTING LAND USE I UNITS ENDING LAND USE I UNITSI CONVERSION FACTOR Res -Low SFD DU General Commercial TSF 0.22 Res -Medium (SFA) DU General Commercial TSF 0.17 Apartment DU General Commercial TSF 0.16 General Commercial TSF Res -Low SFD DU 4A9 General Commercial TSF Res -Medium (SFA) DU 5.82 General Commercial TSF Apartment DU 6.32 TSF = thousand square feet DU = Dwelling Units U:1UcJobsl 012001012321Excell[01232-18.xis]T2-3 I j j 2-6 an increase in trip generation. A transfer the other direction (from commercial to single-family detached residential) could be performed to increase dwelling units by 4.49 for every thousand square feet of commercial lost. Similar conversion factors are included for single-family attached and apartment residential uses. The factors presented in Table 2-3 are related to the PM peak period (consistent with other trip generation calculations for Newport Beach modeling purposes). Conversion factors could potentially be related to daily traffic or AM peak hour, or a subset of AM or PM peak hour total. These factors are included in Table 2-4. , The worst case conversion for each type of residential use is included in Table 2-5. To provide the most conservative .conversion, AM peak hour inbound rates should govern for converting residential uses to commercial (approximately 70 to 120 square feet per dwelling unit). To convert from commercial to residential using the worst case conversion factor, the AM outbound should be used (and 1.25 to 1.67 units would result from a reduction of 1 thousand square feet of commercial). 2.1.3 High -Rise Apartments High-rise apartments are a special apartment use. As defined by ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7ih edition (2003), high-rise apartments have more than 10 floors and typically include one or two elevators. Trip Generation rates for high-rise apartments are compared to general apartment trip generation rates in Table 2-6. As shown in Table 2-3, the ratio of trip generation for high-rise apartments to apartments ranges from 0.56 to 0.63 trips, depending on the time period. Because the ITE rates show a trip reduction of 37 to 43% the factor of 20% used for high-rise apartments in this General Plan analysis is conservative. II 2-7 11 TABLE 2.4 OVERALL MIXED USE CONVERSION FACTORS STARTING LAND USE UNIT52 ENDING LAND USE I UNITS1 PEAK HOUR DAILY AM PM IN IOUTITOTAL IN OUT I TOTAL Res -Low SFD DU General Commercial TSF 0.12 0.80 0.33 0.32 0.15 0.22 0.23 Res -Medium (SFA) DU General Commercial TSF 0.07 0.68 0.26 0.26 0.11 0.17 0.17 Apartment DU General Commercial TSF 0.07 0.60 0.23 0.24 0.10 0.16 0.16 General Commercial TSF Res -Low SFD DU 8.68 1.25 3.06 3.12 6.71 4.49 4A3 General Commercial TSF Res -Medium (SFA) DU 13.94 1.46 3.83 3.87 9.42 5.82 5.74 General Commercial TSF Apartment DU 14.66 1.67 4.29 4.25 10.05 6.32 6.24 2 TSF = thousand square feet DU = Dwelling Units U:1UcJobs\ 01200\01232IExceil[01232-18.xls]T2-4 TABLE 2-5 ABSOLUTE WORST CASE CONVERSION FACTORS STARTING LAND USE I UNITSZ ENDING LAND USE' UNITS I TIME PERIOD/ DIRECTION CONVERSIO FACTOR Res -Low SFD DU General Commercial TSF AM IN 0.12 Res -Medium (SFA) DU General Commercial TSF AM IN 0.07 Apartment DU General Commercial TSF AM IN 0.07 General Commercial TSF Res -Low SFD DU AM OUT 1.25 General Commercial TSF Res -Medium (SFA) DU AM OUT 1.46 General Commercial TSF Apartment DU AM OUT 1.67 2 TSF =thousand square feet DU = Dwelling Units U:\UcJobs\-01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xls]T2-5 2-9 TABLE 2-6 APARTMENT TRIP GENERATION RATE COMPARISON' LAND USE ITE CODE UNITSZI PEAK HOUR DAILY AM PM IN I OUT I TOTAL IN I OUT TOTAL Apartment 220 DU 0.10 0.41 0.51 0.40 0.22 0.62 6.72 Hi h-Rise Apartment 222 DU 0.08 1 0.231 0.30 0,21 1 0.14 0.35 4.20 Ratio (High -Rise Apt. /Apartment) 1 1 0.59 0.56 0.63 Source: ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, 2003. 2 DU = Dwelling Units U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excell[01232-18.xis]T2-6 Ll 11 1. I I I 11 2-10 ' 2.2 Subarea Land Use Alternatives ' 2.2.1 Airport Area ' For the Airport Area, three alternative scenarios (in addition to the currently adopted General Plan) have been presented. All residential use in the Airport Area is either high-rise apartments, or mixed use residential. Option 2 contains 295 mixed use residences and 2,104 high-rise apartments. Option 3 includes 589 mixed use residences and 6,633 high- rise apartments. There is no residential component for the currently adopted General Plan or for Option 1. Table 2-7 summarizes the results of the analysis. PM peak hour trip generation ranges from 10,168 peak thour trips to 13,556 peak hour trips. The currently adopted General Plan generates the lowest number of trips, while option 3 generates the most PM peak hour trips. Daily trip generation follows the same pattern as for the PM peak hour (currently adopted General Plan has the minimum and option 3 has the maximum). The AM peak hour minimum and maximum follow the same pattern as PM peak hour and daily, but options 1 and 2 are switched. The added housing in option 2 and option 3 could help refine traffic congestion by locating workers near to their jobs. 2.2.2 Balboa Village For Balboa Village, five land use options, in addition to the General Plan ' scenario, have been evaluated. Options 4 and 5 each have a mixed use component. There are 440 mixed use residences and 281,986 square ' feet of mixed use commercial in Option 4 and 308 mixed use residences with 205,150 square feet of mixed use commercial in Option 5. Table 2-8 ' summarizes the results of this analysis. PM peak hour trip generation ranges from 1,677 peak hour trips to 1,932 peak hour trips. Option 4 igenerates the highest number of trips, while option 3 generates the fewest PM peak hour trips. AM peak hour and daily trip generation follow the 2-11 TABLE 2-7 AIRPORT AREA SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ALT MIXED USE I HIGH- RISE APARTMENT (DU) HOTEL (ROOM) MIXED USE COMM. (TSF) GEN. COMM. (TSF) GEN. OFFICE (TSF) MED.IGOV. OFFICE (TSF) INDUSTRIAL (TSF) YOUTH CTRI SERVICE (TSF) TRIPS AM PM DAILY Option 3 5835 1431 127.217 790.559 5547.078 86.096 0 10.9 13,181 13,556 145,765 Option 1 0 1561 0 911.414 6753.537 86.096 606.37 10.9 11,380 11,841 126,630 Option 2 1950 1431 63.608 790.559 5915.596 86.096 606.37 10.9 11,416 11,795 126,394 Ab—opted General Plan 0 984 0 871.5 5700.816 86.096 551.93 10.9 9,692 10,168 108,771 U:\UcJobs\_01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xls]T2-7 TABLE 2-8 BALBOA VILLAGE SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ALT COASTAL RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE HOTEL ROOM GEN. COMM. TSF COMM./ REC. AC MARINA SLIP THEATER SEAT) GEN. OFFICE (TSF) LIB. (TSF) POST OFFICE (TSF) CHURCH (TSF) YOUTH CTR/ SERVICE (TSF TRIPS RE - LOW (SFD) DU I RES- MEDIUM (SFA) DU APART- MENT DU APART- MENT DU COMM. TSF AM PM I DAILY Option 4 3601 815 242 396 253.787 0 2.400 4.25 14 350 0 4.8 1.7 2 4.97 1,714 1,932 20.964 Option 5 360 815 242 276 184.635 330 2.400 4.25 14 350 0 4.8 1.7 2 4.97 1,691 1,856 20,115 Adopted General Plan 375 815 242 0 0 34 217.34 4.25 14 350 89.26 4.81 1.7 2 4.97 1.513 1,708 18,504 Option 1 381 815 242 0 0 34 214.34 4.25 14 350 89.26 4.81 1.7 2 4.97 1.509 1,701 18,432 Option 2 378 815 242 0 0 34 214,33 4.25 14 350 89.26 481 1.7 2 4.97 1.507 1,699 18,410 O lion 3 375 815 242 0 0 34 217.34 4.25 14 350 60 4.8 1.7 2 4.97 1.481 1.677 18,18 1 U:\UcJobs\_01200\01232\Excell[01232.18.xis]T2-8 same pattern as for the PM peak hour (option 4 generates the most trips and option 3 generates the fewest trips). 2.2.3 Banning Ranch For Banning Ranch, four alternative scenarios (in addition to the currently adopted General Plan) have been presented. Banning Ranch has not been analyzed as part of the coastal area. Table 2-9 summarizes the results of the analysis. PM peak hour trip generation ranges from 12 peak hour trips to 2,057 peak hour trips. The currently adopted General Plan generates the highest number of trips, while option 1 generates the fewest PM peak hour trips. Trip generation for AM peak hour and daily traffic follow the same pattern as for the PM peak hour (currently adopted General Plan has the maximum and option 1 has the minimum). 2.2.4 Cannery Village Cannery Village is composed of two Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs), each of which is analyzed individually, as the options are not related and can be considered separately in the overall minimum and maximum intensity alternatives. TAZ 1449 is located west of Newport Boulevard south of 32nd Street while TAZ 1454 is east of Newport Boulevard south of 32nd Street. Because of the location, the mixed use residential in Option 1 of TAZ 1449 may be represented as coastal residential. The same is true of mixed use residential in TAZ 1454. In both cases, coastal representation has been used. TAZ 1449 also includes 96,050 square feet of mixed use commercial. TAZ 1454 contains 206,910 square feet of mixed use commercial. Table 2-10 summarizes the results of the analysis. Scenarios for TAZ 1449 include only the currently adopted General Plan and Option 1. For TAZ 1454, the currently adopted General Plan is considered, in addition to options 1 and 2. For TAZ 1449, PM peak hour trip generation ranges from 334 peak hour trips to 444 peak hour trips. The currently adopted General Plan 2-14 TABLE 2-9 BANNING RANCH SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ALT RES-LOW (SFD) DU APARTMENT' DU HOTEL ROOM GENERAL COMMERCIAL SF GENERAL OFFICE TSF INDUSTRIAL TSF ELEMENTARY/ PRIVATE SCHOOL STU PARK AC TRIPS AM PM DAILY Adopted General Plan 225 2510 0 50 235.6 164.4 0 0 2,163 2,057 22,335 Option 2 875 890 75 75 0 0 500 77 1,621 1.560 17,016 Option 3 436 453 75 35 0 0 500 40 884 628 9,059 O tion 4 0 94 262 25 0 0 0 10 302 328 3,528 O tan 1 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 20 13 12 134 ' Land use inclues 14 units outside BanningRanch but in overall Traffic Analysis ysis Zones (TAZs). U: W cJobsl_01200\012321Excell[01232-18.xls]T2-9 TABLE 2.10 CANNERY VILLAGE SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ALT COASTAL RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE COMM. (TSF) GENERAL COMM. (TSF COMM./ RECREATION AC) GENERAL OFFICE (TSF) YOUTH CTR/ SERVICE TSF TRIPS RES-LOW (SFD) DU RES-MEDIUM (SFA) DU APARTMENT DU) AM I PM I DAILY TAZ 1449 Option 1 1 951 1921 86,4451 0 0 363 444 4,810 ople General Plan 95 0 74.9 20.02 264 334 3,601 TAZ 1454 Option 1 0 0 414 186.219 53.270 0.851 01 4.651 8301 1,0611 11,457 Adopted General Plan 41 172 0 0 201.78 0.85 101.5 4.65 764 950 10,239 Option 2 0 152 0 165.528 53.27 0.85 0 4.65 231 280 3.029 U:1UcJobsl_01200101232%Excell[01232-18.xls)T2-10 ' generates fewer trips than Option 1. Trip generation for AM peak hour and daily traffic follow the same pattern as for the PM peak hour (currently ' adopted General Plan is the minimum and Alternative is the maximum). 1 For TAZ 1454, PM peak hour trip generation ranges from 280 peak hour trips for option 2 to 1061 peak hour trips for option 1. The currently adopted General Plan falls into the middle, with 950 PM peak hour trips generated. Trip generation for AM peak hour and daily traffic follow the same pattern as for the PM peak hour (option 2 is the minimum and option 1 is the maximum). 2.2.5 Corona Del Mar For Corona Del Mar, two alternative scenarios (in addition to the currently adopted General Plan) have been presented. For Option 1, the 181 mixed use dwelling units have been represented as 45 mixed use units and 136 ' coastal units (depending on location). The same is true for Option 2. Options 1 and 2 each also include 90,256 square feet of mixed use ' commercial. Additional (non -mixed use) coastal apartments are included in Option 2. Table 2-11 summarizes the results of the analysis. PM peak ' hour trip generation ranges from 4,058 peak hour trips to 4,500 peak hour trips. The currently adopted General Plan generates the highest number ' of trips, while option 2 generates the fewest PM peak hour trips. Option 2 also generates the fewest AM peak hour and daily trips, and the currently adopted General Plan generates the most AM peak hour and daily trips. ' 2.2.6 Lido Isle ' Table 2-12 summarizes the results of the Lido Isle analysis. Two land use options, have been evaluated (adopted General Plan and option 1). No trip generation adjustments have been made. Option 1 is equivalent to the existing condition. PM peak hour trip generation ranges from 718 2-17 N OD TABLE 2-11 CORONA DEL MAR SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY MIXED MIXED RES-LOW SFD' APARTMENT USE USE GEN. GEN. POST COASTAL OTHER COASTAL OTHER APT. COMM. COMM. THEATER OFFICE LIBRARY OFFICE CHURCH PARK TRIPS ALT DU DU DU (DU) DU TSF TSF SEAT TSF TSF TSF) (TSF) (AC AM I PM I DAILY Adopted General Plan 1629 1584 0 54 0 0 538.63 500 148.06 3.8 5.0 12.34 6.1 4,075 4,500 48,807 Option 1 1629 1584 136 54 41 81.185 428.839 Soo 129.6 3.8 5.0 12.34 6.1 4,070 4,468 48,476 Mon 2 1629 1584 211 79 41 81.185 335.411 500 4.879 3.8 5.0 12.34 6.1 2.205 4,058 44,08711 ' Land use inclues land use outside Corona del Mar but in overall Traffic Analysls Zones (TAZs). s Some Coastal apartments also qualify as mixed use, but the coastal attributes are used. U:\1JcJobsl_01200\01232\Excel\101232-18. xl s]T2-11 M TABLE 2-12 LIDO ISLE SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ALT COASTAL RESIDENTIAL TRIPS RES-LOW (SFD) (DU) RES-MEDIUM (SFA) DU APARTMENT DU AM I PM I DAILY Adopted General Plan 1040 102 26 885 916 L 10,021 O tion 1 797 981 261 694 718 7,858 U:\UcJobs\_01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xis]T2-12 2-19 peak hour trips to 916 peak hour trips. The adopted General Plan generates the most trips, and the option 1 generates the fewest PM peak hour trips. Trip generation for AM peak hour and daily traffic follow the same pattern as for the PM peak hour (option 1 generates the fewest trips and the currently adopted General Plan generates the most trips). 2.2.7 Lido Village Lido Village is composed of two Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs), each of which is analyzed individually, as the options are not related and can be considered separately in the overall minimum and maximum intensity alternatives. TAZ 1452 is located northeast of Via Lido. TAZ 1453 is located between Via Lido, 32nd Street, and Newport Boulevard. Table 2- 13 summarizes the results of the analysis. Scenarios for TAZ 1452 include the currently adopted General Plan and options 1, 2, and 3. Option 1 contains 250 mixed use dwelling units represented as coastal and Option 3 contains 312 mixed use dwelling units represented as coastal. Options 1 and 3 for TAZ 1452 each contain 187,199 square feet of mixed use commercial. For TAZ 1453, the currently adopted General Plan is considered, in addition to options 1 and 2. Option 2 contains 61 mixed use dwelling units represented as coastal, and 30,274 square feet of mixed use commercial. For TAZ 1452, PM peak hour trip generation ranges from 579 peak hour trips to 874 peak hour trips. The currently adopted General Plan generates the fewest trips, and option 1 generates the most trips. Trip generation for AM peak hour and daily traffic follow the same pattern as for the PM peak hour (currently adopted General Plan is the minimum and option 1 is the maximum). For TAZ 1453, PM peak hour trip generation ranges from 558 peak hour trips for the currently adopted General Plan to 711 peak hour trips for option 2. Trip generation for AM peak hour and daily traffic follow the 2-20 m = m = m = m = = = m m m = = m i m TABLE 2-13 LIDO VILLAGE SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ALT COASTAL RESIDENTIAL HOTEL (ROOM) GENERAL COMMERCIAL (TSF MIXED USE COMMERCIAL TSF THEATER (SEAT) GENERAL OFFICE (TSF YOUTH CTR/ SERVICE (TSF CHURCH (TSF) TRIPS RES,MEDIUM (SFA) DU APARTMENT (DU) AM I PM DAILY TAZ 1452 Option 1 0 250 200 0 168.479 0 0 6 0 707 874 9,420 Option 2 0 0 200 199.679 0 0 0 6 0 699 867 9.325 Option 3 0 312 0 0 168.479 0 0 6 0 600 761 8,224 apte General Plan 12 0 0 130.510 0 0 90.22 6 0 459 579 6,229 TAZ 1453 Option 2 0 611 01 125.762 27.199 6851 98.0041 01 26.011 5671 7111 7,644 Option 1 Adopted General Plan 0 0 120 0 01 0 125-762f 111.58 0 0 685 685 98.004 119.900 01 0 26.011 26.01 5251 455 6421 558 6,907 5.989 U :\U cJobs\_01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18. xls]T2-13 same pattern as for the PM peak hour (option 2 is the maximum and currently adopted General Plan is the minimum). 2.2.8 Mariner's Mile For Mariner's Mile, two alternative scenarios (in addition to the currently adopted General Plan) have been presented. For traffic modeling purposes, options 1 and 2 are identical, as the model does not differentiate between different types of commercial uses ("marine -related" vs. "typical' commercial uses in this case). Mariner's Mile has not been represented as having coastal residential characteristics, so the mixed use apartments in Opions 1 and 2 are represented as mixed use. The mixed use commercial has been factored as well. Table 2-14 summarizes the results of the analysis. PM peak hour trip generation ranges from 4,599 peak hour trips to 5,304 peak hour trips. The currently adopted General Plan generates the fewest trips, while option 1 or 2 generates the most PM peak hour trips. The AM peak hour and daily trip generation follow the same pattern as the PM peak hour (adopted General Plan trip generation is less than option 1 or 2). 2.2.9 McFadden Square McFadden Square is composed of two Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs), each of which is analyzed individually, as the options are not related and can be considered separately in the overall minimum and maximum intensity alternatives. TAZs 1450 and 1451 have been analyzed separately, with each having a currently adopted General Plan scenario and option 1. TAZ 1450 located east of Newport Boulevard in the vicinity of the intersection of Balboa Boulevard and Newport Boulevard. TAZ 1451 is located west of TAZ 1450. Table 2-15 summarizes the results of this analysis. 2-22 m m m m N N W TABLE 2-14 MARINER'S MILE SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY RES- MIXED USE MIXED JUNIOR NURSING YOUTH LOW APART- APART- USE GEN. GEN. /HIGH POST ICONV. CTR.I (SFD) MENT MENT HOTEL COMM. COMM. MARINA OFFICE SCHOOL OFFICE HOME CHURCH SERVICE PARK TRIPS ALT DU DU DU ROOM) (TSF) (TSF) (SLIP) (TSF) (STU) (TSF) (BED) (TSF) (TSF) (AC AM I PM DAILY Option 1 or 2 1 8371 2741 5431 2041 157.1891 758.9211 1301 363.5571 21841 01 681 59.68 35.68 0.4 4,720 5.304 57.493 Adopted General Plan 837 18g 0 204 0 779.8 130 466.19 2184 9.9 68 59.68 35.68 044 4,122 1 4,594 49.783 U:\UcJobs\_01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xIsIT2-14 Y/_1-1R4P5&1 McFADDEN SQUARE SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ALT COASTAL RESIDENTIAL MOTEL (ROOM) HOTEL (ROOM) GENERAL COMMERCIAL (TSF) MIXED USE OFFICE TSF GENERAL OFFICE TSF YOUTH CTR/ SERVICE (TSF) TRIPS I RES-LOW (SFD) (DU RES-MEDIUM (SFA) (DU) APARTMENT (DU) AM PM DAILY TAZ 1450 Option 1 0 159 134 90 74 81.79 103.185 0 0 529 601 6,481 Adopted General Plan 0 159 3 16 0 67.59 0 35.75 0 305 366 3,955 TAZ 1451 Option 1 22 110 5 3 183 93.218 0 0 6 457 550 5,926 Adopted General Plan 22 110 5 3 22 82.75 0 8 0 313 391 4,221 U:\U cJ obs\_01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18. xls]T2-15 TAZ 1450 contains mixed use residential (represented as coastal) and mixed use office. For TAZ 1450, PM peak hour trip generation ranges ' from 366 peak hour trips for the currently adopted General Plan to 601 peak hour trips for option 1. Trip generation for AM peak hour and daily ttraffic follow the same pattern as for the PM peak hour (currently adopted General Plan is the minimum and option 1 is the maximum). Only the coastal residential adjustment applies to TAZ 1451. For TAZ 1451, PM peak hour trip generation ranges from 391 peak hour trips for currently adopted General Plan to 550 peak hour trips for option 1. Trip ' generation for AM peak hour and daily traffic follow the same pattern as for the PM peak hour (currently adopted General Plan is the minimum and ' option 1 is the maximum). ' 2.2.10 Newport Center / Fashion Island ' For Newport Center / Fashion Island, three alternative scenarios (in addition to the currently adopted General Plan) have been presented. All ' new apartments in Newport Center are High Rise apartments. Table 2-16 summarizes the results of the analysis. PM peak hour trip generation ' ranges from 10,178 peak hour trips to 12,289 peak hour trips. The currently adopted General Plan generates the lowest number of trips, ' while option 1 generates the most PM peak hour trips. AM peak hour trip generation follows the same pattern as for the PM peak hour (currently ' adopted General Plan has the minimum and option 1 has the maximum). Daily minimum and maximum trip generation is in the same pattern as PM ' peak hour, but the two in the middle (Option 3 and Option 2) are switched. 2.2.11 Old Newport Boulevard Three land use options, in addition to the General Plan scenario, have ' been evaluated for Old Newport Boulevard. Although there is a true mixed use development in Old Newport Boulevard for Options 1, 2, and 3, 1 2-25 TABLE 2-16 NEWPORT CENTER/FASHION ISLAND SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY HIGH RI El CULTURAL' MEDIUM APART. APART- GEN. TENNIS GEN. MED./GOV. LEARNING GOLF (SFA) MENT MENT HOTEL REG. COMM. CLUB THEATER OFFICE OFFICE CENTER LIBRARY COURSE TRIPS AM PM DAILY ALT (SU) (DU DU ROOM COMM. TSF) (CR SEA (TSF) ITSF) (AC Option 1 419 245 861 1513 1559 501.248 22 3850 3570.803 530.002 98 65 994 11,098 12,289 131.908 Option 3 419 245 981 1036 1633.84 302.98 22 3850 3283.72 351.95 40 65 99.4 9,789 10,818 116,168 Option 2 419 245 120 1036 1464 312.98 22 3850 4167.652 351.95 40 65 99.4 9,929 10,839 116.216 A 0pte General Plan 419 245 0 1036 1633.84 302.98 22 3850 3283.72 351.95 40 65 99.4 9,129 10,178 109.174 U:\UcJobs\_01200\012321Exce6[01232-18.xis]T2-16 I n I 1 11 11 L 11 the size of the development precludes it from qualifying for mixed use factoring. Table 2-17 summarizes the results of this analysis. PM peak hour trip generation ranges from 830 peak hour trips to 1,471 peak hour trips. Option 1 generates the most trips, while the currently adopted General Plan generates the fewest PM peak hour trips. Trip generation for AM peak hour and daily traffic follow the same pattern as for the PM peak hour (option 1 generates the most trips and the currently adopted General Plan generates the fewest trips). 2.2.12 West Newport Highway And Adjoining Residential West Newport Highway and Adjoining Residential is composed of three blocks (A, B, and C), and one non -study area, each of which is analyzed individually, as the options are independent of one another, and no land use allocation by block for the currently adopted General Plan is available. The currently adopted General Plan scenario contains all of the areas. Block B contains only one option, as does the non -study area. Blocks A and C each have four options. Options have been defined for the 16 combinations of Block A and C options (with Block B and non -study area included in each for total TAZ options). The only mixed use development is in Option 1 for Block C (348 mixed use dwelling units and 86,902 square feet of commercial). Table 2-18 summarizes the results of the analysis. PM peak hour trip generation for the TAZ ranges from 665 peak hour trips to 981 peak hour trips. The highest traffic generator for the PM peak hour is option 5. Option 5 contains option 2 (special needs housing) for Block A and option 1 (mixed use) for Block C (in addition to Block B and non -study area). Option 5 also generates the most AM peak hour trips and the most daily traffic. The lowest traffic generator is Option 16. Option 16 contains option 4 for both Block A (parking lot) and Block C (limited retail, housing, and hotel) (in addition to Block B and non -study area). Option 16 also generates the lowest AM peak hour and daily traffic, of all the options. I 2-27 TABLE 2.17 OLD NEWPORT BOULEVARD SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ALT RES-LOW (SFD) DU RES-MEDIUM (SFA) DU APARTMENT DU HOTEL ROOM) GENERAL COMMERCIAL (TSF) GENERAL OFFICE (TSF) MEDICAL OFFICE (TSF I TRIPS AM I PM I DAILY Option 1 200 379 297 53 169.786 0 169.231 1,337 1,471 15,899 Option 3 200 379 416 53 120.879 0 0 1,024 1,089 11,816 Option 2 200 459 250 53 120.879 0 0 978 1,045 11,333 Adopted General Plan 205 379 8 531 66.38 135.73 11.29 808 830 8,982JI U:IU cJo bs4_012001012321Excell[01232-18. xls]T2-17 TABLE 2-18 WEST NEWPORT HIGHWAY AND ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ALT RES-LOW (SFD) (DU) APARTMENT DU MIXED USE APARTMENT (DU) HOTEL ROOM MOTEL ROOM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TSF) MIXED USE COMMERCIAL (TSF) PARK (AC) TRIPS AM I PM I DAILY Option 5 462 291 313 0 0 0 78212 0 956 981 10,676 Ado ted General Plan 462 293 0 0 90 50.031 0 ol 7431 7591 8,241 Option 16 4621 2731 ol ol 1451 18.1051 ol 01 6781 6651 7,233 U:\UcJobs\_01200101232\Exce I\[01232-18. xis]T2-18 2.3 2.2.13 West Newport Industrial For West Newport Industrial, three options (in addition to the currently adopted General Plan) have been presented. No adjustments have been made for this subarea. Table 2-19 summarizes the results of the analysis. PM peak hour trip generation ranges from 5,146 for Option 3 to 6,238 for Option 2. AM peak hour and daily trip generation follow the same pattern as the PM peak hour traffic. Conclusions On Table 2-20, we have presented options for each subarea that will generate the fewest PM peak hour trips, the option for each subarea that will generate the most PM peak hour trips and the options for each subarea (excluding the currently adopted General Plan) that will generate the fewest trips. Table 2-21 provides an overview of trip generation minimum, maximum, and currently adopted General Plan for all subareas selected for evaluation. Table 2-21 does not include the entire City of Newport Beach. 2-30 m m m m m � = m= w m m m� m m s m TABLE 2-19 WEST NEWPORT INDUSTRIAL SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ALT RES-LOW (SFD) DU APARTMENT DU NURSING HOME BEDS) GENERAL COMMERCIAL (TSF) GENERAL OFFICE (TSF) MEDICAL OFFICE (TSF) HOSPITAL (BEDS INDUSTRIAL TSF DAY CARE TSF SCHOOL STU PARK AC TRIPS AM PM I DAILY Option 2 98 2818 593 121.021 306.67 1023.03 1265 888.882 7.7 622 0.17 6,518 6,238 67,039 Option 1 98 2649 593 72.17 373.73 410.55 1265 1191.72 7.7 622 0.17 5,620 5,206 55,961 Adopted General Plan 98 2649 593 72.17 373.73 410.55 1265 1191.72 7.7 622 0.17 5.620 5.206 55,961 �O lion 3 98 3172 534 72.17 502.03 348.92 1265 499.457 7.7 622 0 1 5,530 5,146 56,398 U:\UcJobs\_01200\01232\Ext N01232-18.xlsIT2-19 N w N TABLE 2-20 RECOMMENDED OVERALL GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT ALTERNATIVES SUMMARY SUBAREA TRUE MINIMUM SUBAREA OPTIONS ONLY MINIMUM SUBAREA OPTIONS ONLY MAXIMUM Airport Area Adopted General Plan Option 2 Option 3 Balboa Village Option 3 Option 3 Option 4 Banning Ranch Option 1 Option 1 Option 2 Cannery Village TAZ 1449 Adopted General Plan Option 1 Option 1 Cannery Village TAZ 1454 Option 2 Option 2 Option 1 Corona Del Mar Option 2 Option 2 Option 1 Lido Isle Option 1 Option 1 Adopted General Plan Lido Village TAZ 1452 Adopted General Plan Option 3 Option 1 Lido Village TAZ 1453 Adopted General Plan Option 1 Option 2 Mariner's Mile Adopted General Plan Option 1 or 2 O tion 1 or 2 McFadden Square TAZ 1450 Adopted General Plan Option 1 Option 1 McFadden Square TAZ 1451 Adopted General Plan Option 1 Option 1 New ort Center /Fashion Island Adopted General Plan Option 2 Option 1 Old Newport Boulevard Adopted General Plan Option 2 O lion 1 West Newport Highway and AdjoiningResidential Option 16 Option 16 O tion 5 West Newport Industrial Option 3 Option 3 1 Option 2 Only alternatives considered are option 1 (existing densities) and currently adopted General Plan U:WcJ obsl_012001012321Exce11[01232-18.xl s]T2-20 w TABLE 2-21 OVERALL ALTERNATIVES SUBAREA TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY' SUBAREA MINIMUM CURRENTLYADOPTEDGP MAXIMUM AM PM DAILY I AM PM DAILY AM I PM DAILY Airport Area 9,692 10,1681 108,771 9,6921 10,168 108,771 13,1811 13,556 145,765 Balboa Village 1,481 1,677 18,180 1,513 1,708 18,504 1,7141 1,932 20,964 Banning Ranch 13 12 134 2,163 2,057 22,335 2,163 2,057 22,335 Cannery Village TAZ 1449 264 334 3,601 264 334 3,601 363 444 4,810 Cannery Village TAZ 1454 231 280 3,029 764 - 950 10,239 830 1,061 11,457 Corona Del Mar 3,730 4,042 43,915 4,061 4,484 48,635 4,061 4,484 48,635 Lido Isle 694 718 7,858 885 916 10,021 885 916 10,021 Lido Village TAZ 1452 459 579 6,2291 459 579 6,229 707 874 9,420 Lido Village TAZ 1453 455 558 5,9891 455 558 5,989 567 711 7,644 Mariner's Mile 4,100 4,566 49,4731 4,100 4,566 49,473 4,698 5,275 57,183 McFadden Square TAZ 1450 305 366 3,955 305 366 3,955 529 601 6,481 McFadden -Square TAZ 1451 313 391 4,221 313 391 4,221 457 550 5,926 i Newport Center / Fashion Island 9,129 10,178 109,174 9,129 10,178 109,174 11,098 12,289 131,908 w Old New ort Boulevard 808 830 8;980 808 830 8,980 1,337 1,471 15,899 West Newport Highway and Adjoining Residential 678 665 7,233 743 759 81241 956 981 10,676 West Newport Industrial 5,5301 ,530 5,146 55,398 5,620 5,206 55,961 6,518 6,238 67,039 TOTAL 37,8821 40,510 4 66.140 41,274 44,050 474,329 50,0641 53,4401 576,163 ' Summary includes subareas only and notthe entire City of Newport Beach U;\UcJobs\_01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xls]T2-21 II 11 11 I THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2-34 ' 3.0 CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (POST-2025) WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK SCENARIO This chapter presents currently adopted General Plan Buildout (Post-2025) with ' constrained network conditions. General Plan Buildout model inputs are discussed and refined forecast volumes are presented. Data are compared to existing conditions to ' show reasonable growth and to previously published currently adopted General Plan ' Baseline Conditions results to show differences. 3.1 Land Use and Socioeconomic Data (SED) ' This section discusses the land use and socioeconomic data inputs. ' 3.1.1 Existing Land Use Data ' The existing conditions land use data has changed slightly from the previously published data. The total existing land use for the City is shown in Table 3-1. The Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) containing Hoag Hospital has been disaggregated to five smaller TAZs which (combined) ' contain the same total land use quantities. Government offices have been represented as medical/government offices, rather than the general office ' designation used before. Some specific land uses have been reallocated to more general categories consistent with the updated General Plan data ' to reduce the potential for unexplained differences from existing to buildout conditions. Appendix "B" contains study area land use by TAZ. ' The disaggregated TAZ structure for the Hoag Hospital area is also included in Appendix'B". ' 3.1.2 General Plan Buildout Land Use Data The General Plan Buildout land use data was provided to Urban ' Crossroads, Inc. staff by City of Newport Beach staff. Appendix "C" of this report documents the explicit land use data included in NBTM 3.1 for currently adopted General Plan Buildout conditions in this analysis. 3-1 TABLE 3.1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH EXISTING LAND USE SUMMARY NSTM CODE' DESCRIPTION UNITS 2 PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED QUANTITY REVISED QUANTITY CHANGE % . CHANGE 1 Low Density Residential DU 14,841 17.124 2,283 15.38% 2 Medium Densit Residential DU 12,939 9,535 3,404 -26.31% 3 Apartment DU 7,622 9.199 1,577 20.69% 4 Elderly Residential DU 348 200, 148 -42.53% 5 Mobile Home DU 894 600 -294 -32.89% TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DU 36,644 36,668 14 0.04% 6 Motel ROOM 210 134 76 -36.19% 7 Hotel ROOM 2.745 2,821 76 2.77% 9 Regional Commercial TSF 1,259,000 1,259.000 0.00% 10 General Commercial TSF 2,926.160 3.696.781 770.621 26.34% 11 Commercial/Recreation ACRE 5.100 5.100 0.00% 13 Restaurant TSF 640.520 99.370 541.150 -84.49% 15 Fast Food Restaurant TSF 78.031 13.940 64.091 -82.14% 16 Auto Dealer/Sales TSF 288:320 172.420 115.900 -40.20% 17 1 Yacht Club TSF 54.580 51.830 2.750 -5.04% 18 Health Club TSF 63.500 16,770 46.730 -73.59% 19 Tennis Club CRT 60 60 0.00% 20 Marina SLIP 1,055 11055 0.00% 21 Theater SEAT 5,489 5,489 0 0.00% 22 Newport Dunes ACRE 64.00 64.00 0.00% 23 General Office TSF 10,900.190 10.865.733 34A57 -0.32% 24 Medical/Government Office TSF 761.459 795.926 34.467 4.53% 25 Research & Development TSF 327.409 81.730 245.679 -76.04% 26 Industrial TSF 1,042.070 1,291.079 1 249.009 23.90% 27 Mini -Story efWarehouse TSF 199.750 196.420 3.330 -1.67% 28 Pre-school/Day Care TSF 55.820 55.820 0.00% 29 Elementary/Private School STU 4,399 4.399 0 -0.01% 30 Junior/High School STU 4,765 4,765 0.00% 31 Culturalli-eaming Center TSF 35,000 35.000 0.00% 32 Library TSF 78.840 78.840 0.00°/0 33 Post Office TSF 53.700 53.700 0.00% 34 Hospital BED 351 351 0.00% 35 Nursin /Conv. Home BEDS 661 661 0.00°/0 36 Church TSF 377.760 377.760 0.00% 37 Youth Ctr./Service TSF 149.560 149.560 0.000 0.00% 38 Park ACRE 113.970 113.970 0.000 0.00% 39 Regional Park ACRE N/A 40 Golf Course ACRE 305.330 305.330 0.000 0.00% Uses 8, 12, and 14 are part of the old NBTAM model structure and are not currently utilized in the City land use datasets. 2 Units Abbreviations: DU = Dwelling Units TSF = Thousand Square Feel CRT = Court STU = Students U.\UeJobs�_012001012321Exce8(01232-18.xis]T3.1 3-2 I Appendix "D" contains the land use changes by TAZ compared to the previously published Baseline Report. Table 3-2 summarizes the overall currently adopted General Plan Buildout land uses for the City of Newport Beach. An overall comparison to previously published currently adopted General Plan land use is also shown in Table 3-2. Land uses have been updated based on more detailed information available, to provide better detail in the vicinity of Hoag Hospital, and to provide more flexibility on certain sites by using more general land use categories. The medical office land use category has been re -identified as medical/government office; however, no changes have been made to the characteristics of the category Table 3-3 shows currently adopted General Plan Buildout land use growth from existing conditions. Medium density residential and apartments each grow by more than 3,000 dwelling units. Non-residential categories that grow by more than 500,000 square feet include general commercial, general office, and industrial land uses. 3.1.3 Existing Socioeconomic Data (SED) Land use data has been converted into socioeconomic data (SED). Table 3-4 shows SED for existing conditions. Changes are primarily caused by the generalization of land use categories. 3.1.4 General Plan Buildout Socioeconomic Data (SED) General Plan Buildout SED that has been converted from land use is summarized in Table 3-5. Table 3-5 also contains a comparison of currently adopted General Plan Buildout SED to existing SED for the City of Newport Beach. The total number of dwelling units are projected to grow by 7,893 units (23 %) from existing conditions. The residential units growth has increased by around 2,400 dwelling units compared to 3-3 i' TABLE 3-2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE COMPARISON NBTM CODE' DESCRIPTION UNITS 2 PUBLISHED QUANTITY I REVISED QUANTITY I GROWTH % GROWTH 1 Low Density Residential DU 1 15,2131 18,347 1 3,1341 20.60% 2 Medium Density Residential DU 17,723 12,859 4,864 -27.44% 3 Apartment DU 8,468 13,3741 4,906 57.94% 4 Elderly Residential DU 348 200 148 -42.53% 5 Mobile Home DU 749 455 -294 -39.25% TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DU 42,501 45,235 1 2,734 6.43% 6 Motel ROOM 256 139 117 -45.70% 7 Hotel ROOM 3,270 3,387 117 3.58% 9 Regional Commercial TSF 1,633.850 1,633.840 0.010 0.00% 10 General Commercial TSF 3,692.980 4,627.760 934.780 25.31% 11 Commercial/Recreation ACRE 5.100 5.100 0.00% 13 Restaurant TSF 859.800 198,780 -661.020 -76.88% 15 Fast Food Restaurant TSF 94.540 13.940 80.600 -85.25% 16 Auto Dealer/Sales TSF 323.290 227.170 96.120 -29.73% 17 1 Yacht Club TSF 73.060 70.310 2.750 -3.76% 18 Health Club TSF 108.070 61.330 46.740 -43.250%lo 19 Tennis Club CRT 60 59 1 -1.67% 20 Marina SLIP 1,055 1,055 0.00% 21 Theater SEAT 5.475 5,475 0 0.00% 22 Newport Dunes ACRE 64.00 64.00 0.00% 23 General Office TSF 12,153.473 12,305.620 152.147 1.25% 24 Medical/Government Office TSF 895.420 910,616 15.196 1.70% 25 Reseatch & Development TSF 809.330 81.730 727.600 -89.90% 26 Industrial TSF 1,060.762 1,956.092 895.330 84AO% 27 Mini-Storage/Warehouse TSF 199.750 196.420 3.330 -1.67% 28 Pre-school/Day Care TSF 56.770 56.770 0.006Z 29 Elementary/Private School STU 4,455 4.455 - 0.00% 30 Junior/High School STU 4.765 4,765 0.00% 31 Cultural/Leaming Center TSF 40.000 40.000 0.00% 32 Library TSF 78.840 78.840 0.00% 33 Post Office TSF 73,700 73.700 0.00% 34 Hospital BED 1,265 1,265 0.00% 35 Nurein /Conv. Home BEDS 661 661 0.00% 36' Church TSF 467.210 467.210 0.00% 37 Youth Ctr./Service TSF 166.310 166.310 0.000 0.00% 38 Park ACRE 94.910 94:920 0.010 0.01% 39 Regional Park ACRE 45,910 45.910 - NIA 40 Golf Course ACRE 298:330 298.290 -0.040 -0.010 Uses 8, 12, and 14 are part of the old N9TAM model structure and are not currently utilized in the City land use datasets. 2 Units Abbreviations: DU = Dwelling Units TSF = Thousand Square Feet CRT = Court STU = Students U:1UcJobs\ 01200N12321ExceRO1232-18.xlsjT3.2 11 1� 1 1 1 11 11 1 iI 3-4 11 TABLE 3-3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACKGENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE GROWTH FROM EXISTING NBTM CODE' DESCRIPTI 1 Low Density Resident! 2 Medium Density Resic 3 Apartment 4 Elderly Residential 5 Mobile Home TOTAL DWELLING U 6 Motel 7 Hotel 9 Regional Commercial 10 General Commercial 11 Commercial/Recreatio 13 Restaurant 15 Fast Food Restaurant 16 Auto Dealer/Sales 17 Yacht Club 18 Health Club 19 Tennis Club 20 Marina 21 Theater 22 Newport Dunes 23 General Office 24 Medical/Government C 25 Research & Develo m 26 Industrial 27 Mini -Story e/Warehou 28 Pre-school/Day Care 29 Elementary/Private Sct 30 Junior/High School 31 Cultural/Learning Carib 32 Library 33 Post Office 34 Hospital 35 Nursin /Conv. Home 36 Church 37 Youth Ctr./Service 38 Park 39 Re tonal Park 40 Golf Course ' Uses 8, 12, and 14 are part of the the City land use datasets. 2 Units Abbreviations: DU = Dwelling Units TSF = Thousand Square Feet CRT = Court STU = Students U:1UcJobsl 012001012321E ce0[01232-18.x1 TABLE 3-4 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH' LAND USE BASED EXISTING SOCIOECONOMIC DATASUMMARY VARIABLE PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED QUANTITY I REVISED QUANTITY I CHANGE % CHANGE Occupied Single Family Dwelling Units 13,8421 i5,9701 2,128 16% Occupied Multi -Family Dwelling Units 20,4091 18,294 -2,115 -10% TOTAL OCCUPIED DWELLING UNITS 34,2511 34,264 13 0% Group Quarters Population 6611 6611 0 0% Population 75,8171 75,211 -606 -1% Em to ed Residents 1 44,3791 44,6351 256 1 % Retail Employees 1 11,2111 10,970 -241 -2% Service Employees 1 17,1501 17,295 145 1% Other Employees 1 37,0771 36,990 -87 0% TOTAL EMPLOYEES 1 65,4381 65,255 -183 0% EIem/Hi h School Students ---F-9,1641 9.1641 01 00/1 1 Includes data converted from land use only. Excludes Newport Coast and recent annexation areas. U.lUoJobs\ Q1200 O12321ExceR[01232-10xisIT3-4 3-6 TABLE 3-5 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH' LAND USE BASED SOCIOECONOMIC DATA GROWTH FROM EXISTING VARIABLE 2002 QUANTITY BUILDOUT QUANTITY I GROWTH % GROWTH Occupied Single F mily Dwelling Units 15,970 17,165 1,195 7% Occupied Multi-FamilyDwellingUnits 18,294 24,992 6,698 37% TOTAL OCCUPIED DWELLING UNITS 1 34,2641 42,1571 7,893 23% Group Quarters Population 6611 6611 01 0% Population 75,211 91,095 15,884 21% Employed Residents 44,6351 54,6571 10,022 22% Retail Employees 1 10,9701 13,6521 2,682 24% Service Employees 1 17,2951 21,149 3,854 22% Other Employees 36,9901 45,384 8,394 23% TOTAL EMPLOYEES 1 65,2551 80,185 14,930 23% Elem/Hi h School Students 1 9,1641 9,2201 56 1% 1 Includes data converted from land use only. Excludes Newport Coast and recent annexation areas. ' U1UCJ0bs1_01200\012321Excell[01232-18.xls]T3-5 1 3-7 3.2 previously published data, due to explicit representation of Banning Ranch in the , land use database (adopted County projections were used previously). For total employment, an increase of 14,930 employees (23 %) is anticipated. This is also slightly higher than the previously published Baseline data. Socioeconomic data for the remainder of the primary modeling area (and for Newport Coast, where land use data was unavailable) has been unchanged from the previously published data. Trip Generation Existing trip generation by NBTM TAZ is contained in Appendix "E". Table 3-6 summarizes the updated existing trip generation in the City of Newport Beach. The updated input data results in minor changes to the citywide existing trip generation (less than 1 % difference). Table 3-7 summarizes the overall trip generation for General Plan Buildout conditions for the City of Newport Beach and compares it to existing conditions trip generation. Appendix "F" contains a report of trip generation by NBTM TAZ for the City of Newport Beach. Most of these trips have been calculated from the final General Plan Buildout SED presented previously. Supplemental trips (additional trips representing very specific land uses, such as marina) are unchanged from the previously published data. The overall trip generation for the City of Newport Beach currently adopted General Plan is an estimated 879,759 daily vehicle trips. Table 3-8 compares currently adopted General Plan Buildout trip generation to previously published currently adopted General Plan Buildout trip generation. Total trip generation Increases by approximately 19,501 daily trips. The primary cause of this increase in trip generation is Banning Ranch. Previously, land use data was not provided on the Banning Ranch property, so supplemental SED (based on County adopted forecasts) was used, Now that the adopted Newport Beach General iM II II II TABLE 3-6 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH EXISTING TRIP GENERATION TRIP PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS I ATTRACTIONS PRODUCTIONS- ATTRACTIONS PRODUCTIONS / ATTRACTIONS Home Based Work 57,819 81,964 -24,145 0.71 Home Based School 11,336 8,730 2,606 1.30 Home Based Otherz 127,338 109,815 17,523 1.16 Work Based Other 52,152 57,035 -4,883 0.91 Other -Other 91,218 89,734 1,484 1.02 TOTAL 1 339,8631 347,278 -7,415 0.98 OVERALL TOTAL 687,141 PREVIOUS TOTAL 689,848 DIFFERENCE 2,707 % DIFFERENCE 0.4% 1 Home -Work includes Home -Work and Home -University trips, consistent with OCTAM mode choice output. 2 Home -Other includes Home -Shop and Home -Other trips, consistent with OCTAM mode choice output. UAUcJobs\ 01200\012321Excell[01232-16.AsIT3.6 3-9 TABLE 3.7 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TRIP GENERATION GROWTH TRIP PURPOSE DAILY TRIP ENDS GROWTH PERCENT GROWTH EXISTING CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT Home Based Work Productions 57,819 73,968 16,149 27,93% Home Based Work Attractions 81,964 102,230 20,266 24.73% Home Based School Productions 11,336 14,475 3,139 27.69% Home Based School Attractions 8,730 8,845 115 1.32% Home Based Other Productlonsz 127,338 174,257 46,919 36.85% Home Based Other Attractions 109,815 138,334 28,519 25.97% Work Based Other Productions 52,152 65,482 13,330 25,56% Work Based Other Attractions 57,035 71,335 14.300 25.07% Other- Other Productions 91,218 116,275 25,057 27.47% Othet - Oth'erAttractions 1 89,7341 114,65131 24,B241 27.66% TOTAL PRODUCTIONS i 339,8631 444,4571 104,5941 30.78% TOTAL ATTRACTIONS 1 347,2781 435,3021 88,024 25.35% OVERALL TOTAL 1 687,1411 879,7591 192,618 28.03% 1 Home -Work includes Home -Work and Home -University trips, consistentwtth OCTAM mode choice output. 2 Home -Other includes Home -Shop and Home -Other trips, consistent with OCTAM mode choice output. U:\Uciobs\ 01200101232\Exce0101232-18.xlsIT3.7 3-10 F 1 TABLE 3-8 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON TRIP PURPOSE DAILY TRIP ENDS GROWTH PERCENT GROWTH PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED ADOPTED REVISED ADOPTED Home Based Work Productions 70,469 73,968 3,499 4.97% Home Based Work Attractions 100,684 102,230 1,546 1.54% Home Based School Productions 14,125 14,475 350 2.48% Home Based School Attractions 8,845 8,845 0 0.00% Home Based Other Productions2 167,202 174,257 7,055 4.220A Home Based Other Attractions 136,553 138,334 1,781 1.30% or Based Other Productions 64,75E 65,482 727 1.12% Work Based Other Attractions 70,186 71,33E 1,149 1.64% Other - Other Productions 114,557 116,27E 1,718 1.50% Other - Other Attractions 112,8821 114,5581 1,6761 1.48% TOTAL PRODUCTIONS 431,1081 444,4571 13,349 3.10% TOTAL ATTRACTIONS 1 429,1501 435,3021 6,1521 1.43% OVERALL TOTAL 1 860,2581 879,7591 19,501 2.27% 1 Home -Work includes Home -Work and Home -University trips, consistent with OCTAM mode choice output. 2 Home -Other includes Home -Shop and Home -Other trips, consistent with OCTAM mode choice output. UAUcJobs\_01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xis]T3.8 3-11 3.3 Plan for Banning Ranch has been included, trip generation in that area has increased. Appendix "G" shows the zone by zone trip generation comparison. Traffic Assignment Exhibit 3-A shows constrained General Plan Buildout through lanes on Newport Beach roadways. Appendix "H" contains a letter prepared by Urban Crossroads to document changes to the currently adopted roadway system for the constrained network, The General Plan Buildout model network matches these configurations. The network outside the Tier 3 area is unchanged from before. Key roadway changes reflected in the new constrained (versus Baseline) analysis include: • No extension of SR-55 • No widening of Coast Highway through Mariner's Mile No extension of 19th Street across the Santa Ana River • No widening of Jamboree Road north of Ford Road Exhibit 3-13 summarizes the NBTM 3.1 refined General Plan Buildout with constrained network daily traffic volumes throughout the City of Newport Beach. Changes from the currently adopted General Plan Baseline forecasts are shown on Table 3-9. Volume .changes occur primarily because of roadway system constraints (for example, volume increases on Coast Highway are caused by the removal of the Santa Ana River bridge at 19th Street). Table 3-10 compares these refined forecasts to existing counted volumes (presented in the General Plan Baseline document). The highest daily traffic volume increase occurs on Coast Highway. Between Dover Drive and the west City boundary, traffic increases by up to 15,000 vehicles per day (VPD). This increase is caused partly by land use increases in the Banning Ranch area, as well as ongoing growth outside the City of Newport Beach. Volumes on Coast Highway throughout the study area increase. Volumes on Coast Highway near Bayside and in Corona Del Mar generally increase by 7,000-13,000 VPD. 11 'I ,I MEA L NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT CONSTRAINED THROUGH XLANES 3 4D 6D a2 W _ 2D W �� DD 6D 2U 40 4D sw qt 4D 6D 6D PACIFIC OCEAN LEGEND: 4 =NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES D _= DIVIDED U =UNDIVIDED No CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT 3-B WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) 10 43 27 32 28 2 _ 98 27 ' ' 32 23 22 30 37 - , 38 16 58 15 am 1-;` ___ tcsx at � cW'yarcxran 125 7 a 20 40 27 tU 74 11 17 10 3 216 40 r 74 10 4 3 3 � 4s r 75 3 \ /3 P tis 14 :m x 6 33 60 55 $ 18 14 S 4 10 12 7 4 7 31 xwuwe" 1 17 2 12 3 43 9 22 28 22 42 123 3 � 2 2 32 -. 14 5 1i 39 3 +' 19 au. mx sz 25- 5 18 24 17 11 r p 1 29 28 O 1 938 4T 17 8 <z 10 7 32 irtxn rraran 51 45$; c 19 1s °A' 1, xaxvu. 49 4 e �nx n t3 Z4 48 15 46 'E 5 8 28. t 8 B4 ��z _ - 2 34 ems'• 3 2 78 12 �_ 42 _... _! •' 10 4 — 16 11 0 3 4Ga 28 18 54t ` 88.!"56 _ LEGEND: 2a s7 IS, 41 '. 10 -VEHICLES PER DAY 22 41 5 ��~ i' 00 5) sty 9 33 y PACIFIC OCEAN NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE New ort Beach California-01232:BOO6.mxd URBAN cnos>wo. TABLE 3-9 (PAGE 1 OF 4) CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON LOCATION BUILDOUT FORECAST CHANGE %CHANGE (BASELINE) (CONSTRAINED) 15th St. (Coast Hwy. to Bluff Rd.) 9,000 0 -9,000 -100% 15th St. (Bluff Rd. to Monrovia Ave.) 8,000 0 -8,000 -100% 16th St. (Irvine Ave. to Dover Dr.) 6,000 6,000 0 0% 17th St. (Bluff Rd. to east city limit) 10,000 0 -10,000 -100% 32nd St. (west of Newport Blvd.) 8,000 9,000 1,000 13% 32nd St. (east of Newport Blvd.) 5,000 5,000 0 0% Avocado Ave. (north of San Miguel Dr.) 5,000 5,000 0 0% Avocado Ave. (south of San Miguel Dr.) 11,000 12,000 1,000 9% Avocado Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 10,000 10,000 0 0% Balboa Blvd. (south of Coast Hwy.) 21,000 22,000 1,000 5% Bayside Dr. (south of Coast Hwy.) 13,000 12,000 -1,000 -8% Birch St. (Jamboree Rd. to Von Karmen Ave.) 18,000 18,000 0 0% Birch St. (Von Karman Ave, to MacArthur Blvd.) 20,000 20,000 0 0% Birch St. (west of MacArthur Blvd.) 20,000 20,000 0 0% Birch St. (north of Bristol St. North) 27,000 27,000 0 0% Birch St. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 20,000 20,000 0 0% Birch St. (south of Bristol St. South) A 16,000 16,000 0 0% Bison Ave. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 17,000 17,000 0 0% Bison Ave. (MacArthur Blvd. to SR-73 Fwy.) 11,000 11,000 0 0% Bluff Rd. (Coast Hwy. to 19th St.) 13,000 12,000 -1,000 -8% Bonita Canyon Dr. (cast of MacArthur Blvd.) 33,000 34,000 1,000 3% Bonita Canyon Dr. (west of SR-73 Fwy.) 25,000 27,000 2,000 8% Bristol St. North (west of Campus Dr.) 32,000 32,000 0 0% Bristol St. North (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 28,000 28,000 0 0% Bristol St. North (east of Birch St.) 27,000 27,000 0 0% Bristol St. North (west of Jamboree Rd.) 18,000 18,000 0 0% Bristol St. South (west of Campus DrArvine Ave.) 32,000 32,000 0 0% Bristol St. South (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 22,000 23,000 1,000 5% Bristol St. South (east of Birch St.) 21,000 22,000 1,000 5% Bristol St. South (west of Jamboree Rd.) 37,000 37,000 0 0% Campus Dr. (Jamboree Rd. to Von Karmen Ave.) 21,000 22,000 1,000 5% Campus Dr. (Von Karrnan Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 31,000 31,000 0 0% Campus Dr. (west of MacArthur Blvd.) 38,000 39,000 1,000 3% Campus Dr. (north of Bristol St. North) 38,000 39,000 1,000 3% Campus Dr. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 39,000 40,000 1,000 3% Coast Hwy. (west of Bluff Rd.) 51,000 60,000 9,000 18% Coast Hwy. (Bluff Rd. to Superior Ave./Balboa Blvd.) 49,000 61,000 12,000 24% Coast Hwy. (Superior Ave. to Newport Blvd.) 38,000 41,000 3,000 8% Coast Hwy. (Newport Blvd. to Riverside Ave.) 72,000 68,000 4,000 -6% Coast Hwy. (Riverside Ave. to Tustin Ave.) 63,000 59,000 4,000 -6% Coast Hwy. (Tustin Ave, to Dover Dr.) 59,000 55,000 4,000 -7% Coast Hwy. (Dover Dr. to Bayside Dr.) 77,000 78,000 1,000 1% Coast Hwy. (Bayside Dr. to Jamboree Rd.) 62,000 64,000 2,000 3% Coast Hwy. Jamboree Rd. to Newport Center Dr. 51,000 51,000 0 0% 3-15 TABLE 3.9 (PAGE 2 OF 4) CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON LOCATION BUILDOUT FORECAST CHANGE %CHANGE (BASELINE) (CONSTRAINED) Coast Hwy. (Newport Center Dr, to Avocado Ave.) 42,000 43,000 1,000 20/0 Coast Hwy. (Avocado Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 45,000 45,000 0 0% Coast Hwy. (MacArthur Blvd. to Goldenrod Ave.) 47,000 48,000 1,000 2% Coast Hwy. (Goldenrod Ave. to Marguerite Ave) 46,000 46,000 0 0% Coast Hwy. (Marguerite Ave. to Poppy Ave.) 42,000 42,000 0 0% Coast Hwy. (Poppy Ave. to Newport Coast Dr.) 35,000 35,000 0 0% Coast Hwy (cast of Newport Coast Dr.) 45,000 44,000 -1,60D -2% DovecDr. (Irvine Ave. to Westcliff Dr.) 11,000 I1,00D 0 0% Dover Dr. (Westcliff Dr. to 16th St) 24,000 24,000 0 0% Dover Dr. (16th St. to Cliff Dr.) 28,000 28,000 0 0% Dover Dr. (Cliff Dr, to Coast Hwy.) 31,000 33,000 2,000 6% Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at University Dr.) 10,000 10,000 0 0% Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at Ford Rd.) 15,00D 15,000 0 0% Ford Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 12,000 13,000 1,000 8% Goldenrod Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 4,000 2,000 100% Highland Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 2,000 2,000 0 0% Hospital Rd. (Placentia Ave. toNewport Blvd.) 23,000 18,000 -5,000 -22% Hospital Rd. (cast of Newport Blvd.) 9,000 10,000 1,000 11% Irvine Ave. (Bristol St. South to Mesa Dr.) 36,000 38,000 2,000 6% Irvine Ave. (Mesa Dr. to University Dr.) 38,000 41,000 3,000 80/ Irvine Ave. (University Dr. to Santa Isabel Ave,) 34,000 40,000 6,000 18% Irvine Ave. (Santo Isabel Ave. to Santiago Dr.) 27,000 33,000 6,000 22% Irvine Ave. (Santiago Dr. to Highland Dr.) 25,000 32,000 7,OOD 28% Irvine Ave. (Highland Dr. to Dover Dr.) 25,000 32,000 7,000 28% Irvine Ave. (Dover Dr. to Westcliff Dr.) 19,000 28,000 9,000 47% Irvine Ave. (Westcliff Dr. to 16th St.) 10,000 13,000 3,000 30% Jamboree Rd. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 47,000 47,000 0 0% Jamboree Rd. (Birch St. to MacArthur Blvd.) 54,000 54,000 0 0% ]amborec Rd. (MacArthur Blvd, to Bristol St. North) 44,000 43,000 -1,000 -2% Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 52,000 51,000 -1,000 -2% Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St. South to Bayview Wy.) 58,000 56,000 -2,000 -3% Jamboree Rd. (Bayview Wy. to University Dr.) 47,000 56,000 9,000 19% Jamboree Rd. (University Dr. to BisonAvc.) 42,000 41,000 -1,000 -2% Jamboree Rd. (Bison Ave. to Ford Rd.) 45,000 45,000 0 0% Jamboree Rd. (Ford Rd, to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 53,000 55,000 2,000 4% Jamboree Rd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to Santa Barbara Dr.) 40,000 43,000 3,000 8% Jamboree Rd. (Santa Barbara Dr. to Coast Hwy.) 39,000 42,000 3,000 8% Jamboree Rd. ( Coast Hwy, toBayside Dr.) 14,000 15,000 1,000 7% MacArthur Blvd. (Campus Dr, to Birch St.) 33,000 33,000 0 0% MacArthur Blvd. (Birch St. to Von Kaman Ave.) 26,000 26,000 0 0% MacArthur Blvd. (Von Korman Ave. to Jamboree Rd.) 32,000 32,000 0 0% MucAtiburBlvd. (south of Jamboree Rd.) 35,000 35,000 0 0% MacArthur Blvd. (north of Bison Ave.) 71,000 74,000 3,000 4% MacArthur Blvd. (Bison Ave. to Ford Rd.) 72,000 74,000 2,000 31/o MacArthur Blvd. (Ford Rd. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 58,000 60,006 2,000 1 3% 3-16 TABLE 3.9 (PAGE 3 OF 4) CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON LOCATION BUILDOUT FORECAST CHANGE %CHANGE (BASELINE) (CONSTRAINED) MacArthur Blvd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to San Miguel Rd.) 37,000 39,000 2,000 5% MacArthur Blvd. (San Miguel Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 37,000 38,000 1,000 3% Marguerite Ave. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 8,000 8,000 0 0% Marguerite Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 7,000 7,000 0 0% Mesa Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 13,000 13,000 0 0% Newport Blvd. (north of Hospital Rd.) 49,000 46,000 -3,000 -6% Newport Blvd. (Hospital Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 54,000 54,000 0 0% Newport Blvd. (Coast Hwy. to Via Lido) 55,000 57,000 2,000 4% Newport Blvd. (Via Lido to 32nd St.) 40,000 41,000 1,000 3% Newport Blvd. (south of 32nd St.) 32,000 33,000 1,000 3% Newport Center Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 17,000 17,000 0 0% Newport Coast Dr. (SR-73 Fwy. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 28,000 29,000 1,000 4% Newport Coast Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 24,000 24,000 0 0% Newport Coast Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 18,000 19,000 1,000, 6% Placentia Ave. (north of Superior Ave.) 12,000 16,000 4,000 33% Placentia Ave. (Superior Ave. to Hospital Rd.) 13,000 11,000 -2,000 -15% Poppy Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 2,000 0 0% Riverside Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 9,000 10,000 1,000 11% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to Santa Cruz Rd.) 18,000 17,000 -1,000 -6% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Cruz Rd. to Santa Rosa Rd.) 12,000 12,000 9 0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Rosa Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 25,000 26,000 1,000 4% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (MacArthur Blvd. to San Miguel Rd.) 22,000 22,000 0 0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (San Miguel Rd. to Marguerite Ave.) 23,000 24,000 1,000 4% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Marguerite Ave. to Spyglass Hill Rd.) 18,000 19,000 1,000 6% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Spyglass Hill Rd. to Newport Coast Dr.) I8,000 19,000 1,000 6% San Miguel Dr. (north of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 10,000 10,000 0 0% San Miguel Dr. (south of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 10,000 10,000 0 0% San Miguel Dr. (north of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 14,000 14,000 0 0% San Miguel Dr. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 16,000 16,000 - 0 0% San Miguel Dr. (MacArthur Blvd. to Avocado Ave.) 19,000 20,000 1,000 5% San Miguel Dr. (west of Avocado Ave.) 11,000 11,000 0 0% Santa Barbara Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 11,000 11,000 0 0% Santa Cruz Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 9,000 9,000 0 0% Santa Rosa Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 14,000 14,000 0 0% Santiago Dr. (Tustin Ave. to Irvine Ave.) 5,000 6,000 1,000 20% Santiago Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 2,000 4,000 2,000 100% Spyglass Hill Rd. (San Miguel Dr. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 5,000 4,000 -1,000 -20% SR-55 Freeway (north of SR-75 Fwy.) 185,000 183,000 -2,000 -1% SR-55 Freeway (22nd St. to 19th St.) 156,000 123,000 -33,000 -21% SR-73 Freeway (SR-55 Fwy. to Campus Dr.) 133,000 134,000 1,000 1 % SR-73 Freewa Jamboree Rd. to University Dr. 96,0001 98,0001 2,000 1 2% ;1 TABLE 3.9 (PAGE 4 OF 4) CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON LOCATION BUILDOUT FORECAST CHANGE %CHANGE (BASELINE) (CONSTRAINED) SR-73 Freeway (Bonita Canyon Rd. to Newport Coast Dr.) 124,000 125,000 1,000 1 VQ SR-73 Freeway (east of Newport CoastDr.) 118,000 119,000 1,000 10/0 Superior Ave. (north of Placentia Ave.) 21,000 19,000 .2,000 -10% Superior Ave. (Placentia Ave, to Hospital Rd.) 17,000 28,000 11,000 65% Superior Ave. (Hospital Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 21,000 28,000 7,000 33% Tustin Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 3,000 1,000 50% University Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 3,000 3,000 0 0% University Dr. (cast of Jamboree Rd,) 16,000 15,000 -1,000 -6%c Via Lido (cast ofNewportBlvd.) 10,000 10,000 0 0% Von Karman Ave. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 18,000 18,000 0 0% Von Karman Ave. (Birch St, to,MacArtllur Blvd.) 15,000 16,000 1,000 7% Westcliff Dr. Orvine Ave. to Dover Dr. 17,000 16,000 -1,000 1 -6% U:IUcJocsl 0120DW 72321FxcoA[01232-18.xls)T3.9 3-18 1 IGE 20% 13% 67% 0% 0% -9% 22% 20% 50% 33% 25% 17% 5% 7% 31O/C 57% N/A N/A N/A 31% 59% 140/° 22% 23% 13% 14% 35% 38% 19% 38% 55% 50% 39% 33% 30% 33% 16% ?8% 31% 31% 3-19 TABLE 3.10 (PAGE 2 OF 4) CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH LOCATION COUNT EXISTING (200112002) BUILDOUT ADOPTED (CONSTRAINED) CHANGE %CHANGE Coast Hwy. (DoverDr. to Bayside Dr.) 63,000 78,000 I5,000 247/. Coast Hwy. (Bayside Dr. to Jamboree Rd.) 5LOOD 64,000 13,000 25% Coast Hwy. (Jamboree Rd, to Newport Center Dr.) 42,000 51,000 9,000 21% Coast Hwy. (Newport Center Dr. to Avocado Ave.) 35,000 43,000 8,000 23% Coast Hwy. (Avocado Ave, to MacArthur Blvd.) 36,000 45,00D 9,000 25% Coast Hwy. (MacArthur Blvd. to Goldenrod Ave,) 40,000 48,000 8,000 209'° Coast Hwy. (Goldenrod Ave. to Marguerite Ave.) 39,000 46,000 7,000 18% Coast Hwy. (Marguerite Ave. to Poppy Ave.) 35,000 42,000 7,000 20% Coast Hwy. (Poppy Ave. to Newport Coast Dr.) 28,000 35,000 7,000 25% Coast Hwy (east ofNewport Coast Dr.) 35,000 44,000 9,000 260/c Dover Dr. (Irvine Ave. to Westcliff Dr.) 9,000 11,000 2,000 220/c Dover Dr. (Westcliff Dr. to 16th St.) 22.000 24,000 2,000 9% Dover Dr. (16th St. to Cliff Dr.) 25,000 28,000 3,000' 12% Dover Dr. (Cliff Dr. to Coast Hwy.) 29,000 33,000 4,000 14% Eastbluff Dr. (wcstof Jamboree Rd. at University Dr.) 10,000 10,000 0 0% Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. atFordRd.) 15,000 15,000 0 0% Ford Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd,) 9,000 13,000 4,000 44% Goldenrod Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 4,000 2,000 1000/0 Highland Dr. (cast of Irvine Ave.) 2,000 2,000 0 00/0 Hospital Rd. (Placentia Ave. to Newport Blvd.) 13,000 18,000 5,000 38% Hospital Rd. (cast of Newport Blvd.) 7,000 10,000 3,000 43% Irvine Ave. (Bristol St. South to Mesa Dr.) 27,000 38,000 11,000 41% Woo Ave. (Mesa Dr. to University Dr.) 31,000 41,000 10,000 320/c Irvine Ave. (University Dr, to Santa Isabel Ave.) 33,000 40,000 7,000 21% Irvine Ave. (Santa Isabel Ave. to Santiago Dr.) 29,000 33,000 4,000 14% Irvine Ave. (Santiago Dr. to Highland Dr.) 27,000 32,000 5,000 19°% Irvine Ave. (Highland Dr. to Dover Dr.) 27,000 32,000 5,000 19% Irvine Ave. (Dover Dr. to Westcliff Dr.) 22,000 28,000 6,000 27% Irvine Ave. (Westeliff Dr. to 16th St.) 12,000 13,000 1,000 8% Jamboree Rd, (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 36,000 47,000 11,000 31% Jamboree Rd. (Birch St. to MocAtthurBlvd.) 42,000 54,000 12,000 29% Jamboree Rd. (MacArthur Blvd. to Bristol St. North) 36,000 43,000 7,000 19% Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 47,000 51,OOD 4,000 9% Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St South to BayvieW Wy.) 47,000 56,000 9,000 19% Jamboree Rd. (Bayview Wy. to University Dr.) 47,000 56,000 9,000 19% Jamboree Rd, (University Dr. to Bison Ave.) 37,000 41,000 4,000 11% Jamboree Rd. (Bison Ave, to Ford Rd.) 39,000 45,000 6,000 150/0 Jamboree Rd. (Ford Rd. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 46,000 55,000 9,000 200/a Jamboree Rd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to Santa Barham Dr.) 34,000 43,000 9,000 26% amboree Rd. (Santa Barbara Dr, to Coast Hwy.) 32,000 42,000 10,000 M% Jamboree Rd. ( Coast Hwy. to Bayside Dr.) 12,000 15,000 3,000 25% MacArthur Blvd. (Campus Dr, to Birch St.) 27,000 33,000 6,000 22% MacArthur Blvd. (Birch St. to Von Korman Ave.) 22,000 26,000 4,000 18% MacArthur Blvd. on Korman Ave. to Jamboree Rd. 26.000 32.000 6.000 23% 3-20 TABLE 3.10 (PAGE 3 OF 4) CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH LOCATION COUNT EXISTING (2001/2002) BUILDOUT ADOPTED (CONSTRAINED) CHANGE %CHANGE MacArthur Blvd. (south of Jamboree Rd.) 27,000 35,000 8,000 30% MacArthur Blvd. (north of Bison Ave.) 61,000 74,000 13,000 21% MacArthur Blvd. (Bison Ave. to Ford Rd.) 63,000 74,000 11,000 17% MacArthur Blvd. (Ford Rd. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 54,000 60,000 6,000 11% MacArthur Blvd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to San Miguel Rd.) 35,000 39,000 4,000 11% MacArthur Blvd. (San Miguel Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 31,000 38,000 7,000 23% Marguerite Ave. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 7,000 8,000 1,000 14% Marguerite Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 6,000 7,000 1,000 17% Mesa Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 12,000 13,000 1,000 8% Newport Blvd. (north of Hospital Rd.) 36,000 46,000 10,000 28% Newport Blvd. (Hospital Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 43,000 54,000 11,000 26% Newport Blvd. (Coast Hwy. to Via Lido) 48,000 57,000 9,000 19% Newport Blvd. (Via Lido to 32nd St.) 36,000 41,000 5,000 14% Newport Blvd. (south of 32nd St.) 29,000 33,000 4,000 14% Newport Center Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 14,000 17,000 3,000 21% Newport Coast Dr. (SR-73 Fwy. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 17,000 29,000 12,000 71% Newport Coast Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 15,000 24,000 9,000 60% Newport Coast Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 12,000 19,000 7,000 58% Placentia Ave. (north of Superior Ave.) 12,000 16,000 4,000 33% Placentia Ave. (Superior Ave. to Hospital Rd.) 7,000 11,000 4,000 57% Poppy Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 2,000 0 0% Riverside Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 9,000 10,000 1,000 11% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to Santa Cruz Rd.) 16,000 17,000 1,000 6% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Cruz Rd. to Santa Rosa Rd.) 11,000 12,000 1,000 9% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Rosa Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 21,000 26,000 5,000 24% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (MacArthur Blvd. to San Miguel Rd.) 19,000 22,000 3,000 16% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (San Miguel Rd. to Marguerite Ave.) 18,000 24,000 6,000 33% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Marguerite Ave. to Spyglass Hill Rd.) 12,000 19,000 7,000 58% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Spyglass Hill Rd. to Newport Coast Dr.) 12,000 19,000 7,000 58% San Miguel Dr. (north of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 7,000 10,000 3,000 43% San Miguel Dr. (south of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 7,000 10,000 3,000 43% San Miguel Dr. (north of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 12,000 14,000 2,000 17% San Miguel Dr. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 12,000 16,000 4,000 33% San Miguel Dr. (MacArthur Blvd. to Avocado Ave.) 19,000 20,000 1,000 5% San Miguel Dr. (west of Avocado Ave.) 10,000 11,000 1,000 10% Santa Barbara Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 10,000 11,000 1,000 10% Santa Cruz Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 8,000 9,000 1,000 13% Santa Rosa Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 11,000 14,000 3,000 27% Santiago Dr. (Tustin Ave. to Irvine Ave.) 5,000 6,000 1,000 20% Santiago Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 3,000 4,000 1,000 33% Spyglass Hill Rd. (San Miguel Dr, to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 4,000 4,000 0 0% SR-55 Freeway (north of SR-75 Fwy.) 155:000 183,000 28,000 18% SR-55 Freeway (22nd St. to 19th St.) 94,000 123,000 29,000 31% SR-73 Freeway SR-55 Fwy. to Campus Dr. 94,000 134,000 40,000 1 43% TABLE 3-10 (PAGE 4 OF 4) CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH LOCATION COUNT EXISTING (200112002) BUILDOUT ADOPTED (CONSTRAINED) CHANGE 'A CHANGE SR-73 Freeway (Jamboree Rd. to UniversityDr.) 59.000 98,000 39,000 66016 SR-73 Freeway (Bonita Canyon Rd. to Newport Coast Dr.) 62,000 125,000 63,000 102% SR-73 Freeway (cast of Newport Coast Dr.) 56,000 119,000 63,000 11300 Superior Ave. (north of Placentia Ave.) 17,000 19,000 2,000 12% Superior Ave. (Placentia Ave. to Hospital Rd.) 22,000 28,000 6,000 27% SuperiorAve. (Hospital Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 24,000 28,000 4,000 17% Tustin Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 3,000 1,000 50% University Dr. (cast of Irvine Ave.) 3,000 3,000 0 0016 University Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 11,000 15,000 4,000 36% Via Lido (cast of Newport Blvd.) 8,000 10,000 2,000 25% Von Korman Ave. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) M,000 18,000 4,000 29% Von Korman Ave. (Birch SL to MacArthur Blvd.) 12,000 16,000 4,000 33% 1.Westcliff Dr. Irvine Ave. to Dover Dr. 16,000 16,000 0 0% U.IUcJobsl 01200101232VExcee(01232.18,xisIT3-10 3-22 Land use increases in the Newport Coast area (from 2002 to buildout) cause Newport Coast Drive to have large volume increases that grow approaching the SR-73 tollway. Increased traffic from Bonita Canyon and Harbor View Hills/Newport Ridge cause volumes on Jamboree Road, MacArthur Boulevard, and Bonita Canyon Drive to go up. Increased capacity on Irvine Avenue south of Bristol Street draws traffic to Campus Drive/Irvine Avenue. The increase is about 2,000 VPD greater than the previously published results, most likely caused by eliminating the SR-55 Freeway extension from 19th Street to south of 17th Street. 3.4 Daily Capacity Analysis Daily roadway segment capacity analysis has been performed at study area roadways, and is shown on Exhibit 3-C. The following roadway segments are expected to operate with daily V/C greater than 0.90: • Newport Boulevard north of Via Lido • Jamboree Road north of Campus Drive • Jamboree Road north of Birch Street • Irvine Avenue north of University Drive • Irvine Avenue north of Santiago Drive • Irvine Avenue north of Highland Drive • Irvine Avenue north of Dover Drive • Dover Drive north of Westcliff Drive • Dover Drive north of Coast Highway • Jamboree Road north of Bayview Way • Jamboree Road north of University Drive • Jamboree Road north of San Joaquin Hills Road • MacArthur Boulevard north of Bison Avenue • MacArthur Boulevard north of Ford Road • MacArthur Boulevard north of San Joaquin Hills Road • Newport Coast Drive north of SR-73 NB Ramps 3-23 EXHIBIT 3-C GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK VOLUMEXAPACITY (VIC) RATIOS 0.23 12 nmr `I 14 °R 9 .47 I 1.OB 15 .SSt , 'c a' CGV( —. _- 1.24 1 J LEGEND: 0.88 - VOLUME / CAPACITY RATIO 1.20 065 °'° a.22 PACIFIC .65, _ OCEAN URBAN NEWPOR7 BEACH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE.Nevmort Beach.Catitomia-01232:ho06 vcmxd aossnon I • Newport Boulevard south of Hospital Road • Jamboree Road south of Birch Street • Irvine Avenue south of University Drive • Hospital Road east of Newport Boulevard • Campus Drive east of MacArthur Boulevard • Bristol Street North east of Birch Street • Bristol Street South east of Birch Street • Coast Highway east of Dover Drive • Coast Highway east of Bayside Drive • Coast Highway east of Jamboree Road • Ford Road east of MacArthur Boulevard • Coast Highway east of MacArthur Boulevard • Coast Highway east of Goldenrod Avenue • Coast Highway east of Marguerite Avenue • Coast Highway east of Poppy Avenue • Coast Highway west of Superior Avenue/Balboa Boulevard • Coast Highway west of Riverside Drive • Bristol Street North west of Campus Drive • Bristol Street South west of Campus Drive • Dover Drive west of Irvine Avenue • Bristol Street South west of Jamboree Road 3.5 Peak Hour Forecasts The final data required to evaluate the constrained currently adopted General Plan Buildout scenario was intersection volume and geometric data for the 63 intersections selected for analysis. The geometric data was provided by City staff and was used to calculate existing General Plan Buildout intersection capacity utilization values (ICUs) at all 63 analysis intersections. Modifications have been made to reduce lanes consistent with the constrained roadway 3-25 system. Table 3-11 summarizes the constrained currently adopted General Plan Buildout ICUs based on the AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes and the intersection geometric data as compared with General Plan Baseline ICUs. Appendix "I" contains the detailed ICU calculation worksheets. The worksheets in Appendix "I" summarize the intersection geometric data and the AM and PM peak intersection turning movement volumes. As shown in Table 3-11, ICU values generally increase in the General Plan Buildout conditions compared to existing conditions. The exceptions occur where new parallel facilities are available, or where an increase in lanes results in increased capacity. A comparison of currently adopted General Plan Buildout ICUs to previously published Baseline ICUs is shown on Table 3-12. Most of the large differences are caused by a change in the number of lanes for the constrained roadway system. Table 3-13 summarizes intersection analysis for buildout conditions. Deficient intersections are shown on Exhibit 3-D. Intersections with ICU values greater than 0.90 (LOS "E" or worse) in either peak period are: • Bluff Road (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM/PM) • Superior Avenue (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM/PM) • Newport Boulevard (NS)/Hospital Road (EW) (PM) • Riverside Drive (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM/PM) • Tustin Avenue (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/Campus Drive (EW) (PM) • Von Karman Avenue (NS)/Campus Drive (EW) (PM) • Jamboree Road (NS)/Campus Drive (EW) (AM/PM) • Campus Drive (NS)/Bristol Street North (EW) (AM/PM) • Birch Street (NS)/Bristol Street North (EW) (AM) • Campus Drive (NS)/Bristol Street South (EW) (AM) • Irvine Avenue (NS)/University Drive (EW) (AM/PM) • Bayside Drive (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (PM) 3-26 TABLE 3-11 (PAGE 1 OF 2) CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO EXISTING INTERSECTION NS/EW AM PEAK HOUR I PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING1 COUNT FUTURE I FORECAST DELTA EXISTING COUNT FUTURE I FORECAST I DELTA 1. Bluff Rd. & Coast Hw. DNE' 1.27 1.27 DNE 1.29 1.29 2. Superior Av. & Placentia Av. 0.66 0.72 0.06 0.67 0.82 0.15 3. Superior Av. & Coast Hw. _ 0.84 1.01 0.17 0.90 0.99 0.09 4. Newport BI. & Hospital Rd. 0.54 0.79 0.25 0.76 0.97 0.27 5. Newport BI. & Via Lido 0.41 0.54 0.13 0.37 0.46 0.09 6. Newport BI. & 32nd St. 0.73 0.52 -0.21 0.78 0.71 -0.07 7. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. 0.841 1.03 0.191 0.931 1.12 0.19 8. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. 0.80 1.02 0.22 0.67 0.85 0.18 9. MacArthur Bl. & Campus Dr. 0.61 0.76 0.15 0.85 1.25 0.40 10. MacArthur BI. & Birch St. 0.49 0.71 0.22 0.66 0.80 0.14 11. Von Kalman Av. & Cam us Dr. 0.55 0.66 0.11 0.79 0.93 0.14 12. MacArthur BI. & Von Kaman Av. 0.46 0.54 0.08 0.53 0.64 0.11 13. Jamboree Rd. & Campus Dr. 0.70 0.92 0.22 0.85 1.24 0.39 14. Jamboree Rd. & Birch St. 0.611 0.79 0.181 0.60 0.801 0.20 15. Campus Dr. & Bristol St. 0.771 0.96 0.191 0.94 1.08 0.14 16. Birch St. & Bristol St. 0.66 0.92 0.26 0.61 0.72 0.11 17. Campus DrArvine Av. & Bristol St. S 0.72 0:93 0.21 0.58 0.77 0.19 18. Birch St. & Bristol St. S 0.46 0.52 0.06 0.44 0.53 0.09 19. Irvine Av. & Mesa Dr. 0.70 0.68 -0.02 0.94 0.90 0.04 20. Irvine Av. & University Dr. 0.82 1.14 0.32 0.89 1.19 0.30 21. Irvine Av. & Santiago Dr. 0.66 0.70 0.04 0.72 0.78 0.06 22. Irvine Av. & Highland Dr. 0.571 0.61 0.041 0.60 0.63 0.03 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 0.72 0.78 0.06 0.64 0.70 0.06 24. Irvine Av. & Westcliff Dr. 0.57 0.67 0.10 0.77 0.82 0.05 25. Dover Dr. & WesteliffDr. 0.38 0.39 0.01 0.48 0.56 0.08 26. Dover Dr. & 16th St. 0.55 0.64 0.09 0.571 0.64 0.07 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.70 0.86 0.16 0.74 0.90 0.16 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.69 0.83 0.14 0.70 0.94 0.24 29. MacArthur BI. & Jamboree Rd. 0.88 0.96 0.08 0.91 0.99 0.08 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. R 0.55 0.70 0.15 0.59 0.69 0.10 31. Bayview Pl. & Bristol St. S 0.48 0.60 0.12 0.56 0.63 0.07 32. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. S 0.75 0.96 0.21 0.72 0.85 0.13 33. Jamboree Rd. & Bayview W . 0Al 0.48 0.071 0.571 0.70 0.13 34. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr. fUniversity Dr. 0.60 0.64 0.04 0.64 0.69 0.05 35. Jamboree Rd. & Bison Av. 0.45 0.51 0.06 0.51 0.58 0.07 36. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr./Ford Rd. 0.69 0.78 0.09 0.65 0.72 0A7 37. Jamboree Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.801 0.61 -0.19 1.001 0.65 -0.35 1 1! TABLE 3.11 (PAGE 2 OF 2) 11 CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO EXISTING I INTERSECTION NS/EW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING COUNT FUTURE FORECAST DELTA EXISTING COUNT FUTURE FORECAST DELTA 38. Jamboree Rd, & Santa Barbara Dr. 0.47 0.55 0.08 0.63 0.71 0.08 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.68 0.85 0.17 0.74 0.89 0.15 0. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.36 0.34 -0.02 1. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.32 0.39 0.07 0.52 0.71 0.19 2. Newport Center Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.40 0.50 0.10 0.52 0.63 O. t l 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.33 0.37 0.04 0.72 0.79 0.07 5. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.58 0,77 0.191 0.66 0.80 0.14 6. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.31 0.47 0.16 0.37 0.56 0.19 7. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.26 038 0.12 0.17 0.29 0.12 8. MacArthur BI. & Bison Av. 0.63 0.78 0.15 0.60 0.80 0.20 9. MackhlurBl. & Ford Rd Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.71 0.77 0.06 0.90 1.06 0.16 50. MacArthur DI. & Son Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.64 0.77 0.13 0.93 1.04 0.11 51. MacArthur Bl. & San Miguel Dr. 0.56 0.63 0.07 0.65 0.77 0.12 52. MacArthur Bl. & Coast Hw. 0.60 0.74 0.14 0.711 0.83 0.12 3. SR-73 NB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.55 0.69 0.14 0.43 0.53 0.10 4. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.30 0.45 0.15 0.41 0.59 0.18 55. San Miguel Dr. & Spyglass Hill Rd. 0.28 0.30 0.02 0.31 0.38 0.07 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd. & San Miguel Dr. 0.44 0.52 0.09 0.54 0.68 0.14 57. Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw. 0.99 1.O8 0.09 0.69 0.79 0.1 58. Marguerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.31 0.38 0.07 0.35 0.51 0.16 59.Margucritc Av. & Coast Hw. 0.83 0.901 0.07 0.821 0.91 0.09 60. Spyglass,Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.44 0.60 0.16 0.301 0.46 0.16 61. Poppy Av. & Coast Hw. 0.61 0.67 0.06 0.65 0.76 0.11 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Rams 0.45 0.54 0.09 0.31 0.40 0.09 64. Ne ort Coast Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.37 0.63 0.26 0,29 0.47 0.18 65. Nc ort Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.47 0.57 0.10 0.50 0.60 0.10 tDNE - Does Not Exist U.WcJobs\ 01200\012321Exc;0101232-18.xls]T3-11 3-28 I TABLE 3-12 (PAGE 1 OF 2) GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO BASELINE INTERSECTION NSIEW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR ADOPTED (BASELINE) ADOPTED (CONSTRAINED) DELTA ADOPTED (BASELINE) ADOPTED (CONSTRAINED) DELTA 1. Bluff Rd. & Coast Hw. 1.01 1.27 0.26 0.76 1.29 0.53 2. Superior Av. & Placentia Av. 0.65 0.72 0.07 0.55 0.82 0.27 3. Superior Av. & Coast Hw. 1.01 1.01 0.00 0.80 0.99 0.19 4. Newport Bl. & Hospital Rd. 0.87 0.79 -0.08 0.93 0.97 0.04 5. Newport BI. & Via Lido 0.52 0.54 0.02 0.44 0.46 0.02 6. Newport BI. & 32nd St. 0.67 0.52 -0.15 0.76 0.71 -0.05 7. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. .0.83 1.03 0.20 1.12 1.12 0.00 8. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. 0.76 1.02 0.26 0.87 0.85 -0.02 9. MacArthur Bl. & Campus Dr. 0.72 0.76 0.04 1.211 1.25 0.04 10. MacArthur Bl. & Birch St. 0.71 0.71 0.00 0.80 0.80 0.00 11. Von Karrnan Av. & Campus Dr. 0.67 0.66 -0.01 0.94 0.93 -0.01 12. MacArthur BI. & Von Karman Av. 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.00 13. Jamboree Rd. & Campus Dr. 0.93 0.92 -0.01 1.23 1.24 0.01 14. Jamboree Rd. & Birch St. 0.90 0.79 -0.11 0.89 0.80 -0.09 15. Campus Dr. & Bristol St. 0.971 0.96 -0.01 1.09 1.08 -0.01 16. Birch St. & Bristol St. 0.931 0.92 -0.01 0.711 0.72 0.01 17. Campus DrJtrvine Av. & Bristol St. S 0.91 0.93 0.02 0.76 0.77 0.01 18. Birch St. & Bristol St. S 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.53 0.53 0.00 19. hvine Av. & Mesa Dr. 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.90 0.90 0.00 20. Irvine Av. & University Dr. 1.15 1.14 -0.01 1.06 1.19 0.13 21. Irvine Av. & Santiago Dr. 0.58 0.70 0.12 0.62 0.78 0.16 22. hvine Av. & Highland Dr. 0.51 0.61 0.10 0.55 0.63 0.08 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 0.75 0.78 0.03 0.65 0.70 0.05 24. Irvine Av. & Westcliff Dr. 0.49 0.67 0.18 0.741 0'.82 0.08 25. Dover Dr. & Westcliff Dr. 0.26 0.39 0.13 0.48 0.56 0.08 26. Dover Dr. & 16th St. 0.47 0.64 0.17 0.55 0.64 0.09 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.71 0.86 0.15 0.74 0.90 0.16 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.85 0.83 -0.02 0.94 0.94 0.06 29. MacArthur Bl. & Jamboree Rd. 0.971 0.96 -0.01 0.98 0.99 0.01 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St, 0.69 0.70 0.01 0.70 0.69 AO.00 31. Ba iew Pl. & Bristol St. S 0.61 0.60 -0.01 0.63 0.63 32. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. S 0.95 0.96 0.01 0.83 0.85 0.02 33. Jamboree Rd. & Bayview W . 0.45 0.48 0.03 0.68 0.70 0.02 34. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr. fUniversity Dr. 0.58 0.64 0.06 0.61 0.69 0.08 35. Jamboree Rd. & Bison Av. 0.46 0.51 0.05 0.54 0.58 0.04 36. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr./Ford Rd. 0.74 0.78 0.041 0.701 0.72 0.02 . Jamboree Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.64 0.61 -0.03 0.65 0.65 0.00 TABLE 3.12 (PAGE 2 OF 2) GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO BASELINE AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED'I ADOPTED INTERSECTION NSIEW (BASELINE) (CONSTRAINED) I DELTA (BASELINE) (CONSTRAINED) DELTA 38. Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbara Dr. 0.52 0.55 0.03 0.69 0.71 0.02 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.84 0.85 0.01 0.87 0.89 0.02 0. Santa Cruz Dr. & Son Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.40 0.36 -0.04 0.38 0.34 -0.04 1. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.34 0.39 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 2. Newport Center Dr. & Coast Hw, 0.511 0.50 -0.01 0.621 0.63 0.01 44. Avocado Av. & Son Miguel Dr. 0.35 0.37 0.02 0.77 0.79 0.02 5. Avocado Av. & CoastHw. 0.76 '0.77 0.01 0,77 0.80 0:03 G. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.46 0.47 0.01 0.56 0.56 0.00 7, SR-73 SB Rams & Bison Av. 0.40 0.38 .0.02 0,29 0.29 0.00 8. MacArthur BI. & Bison Av. 0.77 0.78 0.01 0.77 0.80 0.03 9. MacArttur BI. & Ford RdJBonita Canyon Dr. 0.76 0.77 0.01 1.07 1.06 -0.01 50. MacArthur BI. & San Joaquin Hills Rd, 0.71 0.77 0.06 0.96 1.04 0.08 51. ModAriburBl. & San Miguel Dr. 0.55 0.63 0.08 0.70 0.77 0.07 52. MacArthur Bl. & Coast Hw. 0.72 0.74 0.02 0.81 0.83 0.02 3. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.62 0.69 0.07 0.47 0.53 0.06 54. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.441 0.45 0.01 0.56 0.59 0.03 55. San Miguel Dr. & Spyglass Hill Rd. 031 0.30 .0.01 0.39 0.38 -0,01 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd. & San MiRucl Dr. 0.50 0.52 0.02 0.65 0,68 0.03 57. Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw. 1.08 1.08 0.00 0.76 0.79 0.03 58. Marguerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.37 0.38 0.01 0.50 0.51 0.01 59.Mar uerite Av. & Coast Hw. 0,92 0.90 -0.02 0.95 0.91 -0.04 60. Spyglass Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.57 0.60 0.03. 0.44 0.46 0.02 61. Poppy Av. & Coast Hw. 0.711 0.67 -0.04 0.75 0.76 0.01 62. Newport Coast Do & SR-73 NB Rams 0.52 0.54 0.021 0.36 0.40 0,04 64.'Newport Coast Dr. & San Jon in Hills Rd. 0.60 0:63 0.03 0.46 0.47 0.01 ewport oast r. & oast Hw. 0.59 0.57 -0.02 0.61 0.60 .0.01 U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\C01232-18.xls]T3-12 3-30 TABLE 3-13 (PAGE 1 OF 2) CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH -CONSTRAINED NETWORK INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS/EW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 1. Bluff Rd. & Coast Hw. 1.271 F 1.29 F 2. Superior Av. & Placentia Av. 0.72 C 0.821 D 3. Superior Av. & Coast Hw. 1.01 F 0.991 E 4. Newport BI. & Hospital Rd. 0.79 C 0.971 E 5. Newport BI. & Via Lido 0.54 A 0.461 A 6. Newport Bl. & 32nd St. 0.52 A 0.71 C 7. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. 1.03 F 1.12 F 8. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. 1.021 F 0.85 D 9. MacArthur Bl. & Campus Dr. 0.761 C 1.25 F 10. MacArthur BI. & Birch St. 0.71 C 0.80 C 11. Von Kalman Av. & Campus Dr. 0.66 B 0.93 E 12. MacArthur Bl. & Von Karman Av. 0.54 A 0.641 B 13. Jamboree Rd. & Campus Dr. 0.92 E 1.24 F 14. Jamboree Rd. & Birch St. 0.79 C 0.80 C 15. Campus Dr. & Bristol St 0.96 E 1.08 F 16. Birch St. & Bristol St. 0.921 E 0.72 C 17. Campus Dr./Irvine Av. & Bristol St. S 0.93 E 0.77 C 18. Birch St. & Bristol St. S 0.52 A 0.53 A 19. Irvine Av. & Mesa Dr. 0.68 B 0.901 D 20. Irvine Av. & University Dr. 1.14 F 1.191 F 21. Irvine Av. & Santiago Dr. 0.70 B 0.781 C 22. Irvine Av. & Highland Dr. 0.61 B 0.631 B 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 0.781 C 0.701 B 24.Irvine Av. & Westcliff Dr. 0.61 B 0.821 D 25. Dover Dr. & Westcliff Dr. 0.391 A 0.56 A 26. Dover Dr. & 16th St. 0.64 B 0.64 B 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.86 D 0.90 D 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.83 D 0.94 E 29. MacArthur Bl. & Jamboree Rd. 0.96 E 0.99 E 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. 0.70 B 0.69 B 31. Ba view PI. & Bristol St. S 0.60 A 0.631 B 32, Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. S 0.96 E 0.85 D 33. Jamboree Rd. & Bayview W . 0.48 A 0.70 B 34. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr. /University Dr. 0.64 B 0.69 B 35. Jamboree Rd. & Bison Av. 0.51 A 0.58 A 36. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr./Ford Rd. 0.78 C 0.72 C 37. Jamboree Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.61 B 0.65 B TABLE 3-13 (PAGE 2 OF 2) CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS/EW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 38. Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbara Dr, 0.55 A 0.71 C 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.85 D 0.89 D 0. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd, 0.36 A 0.34 A 41. Santa Rosa Dr. & Son Joaquin Hills Rd, 0.39 A 0.71 C 2. Newport Center Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.50 A 0.63 B 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.37 A 0.79 C 45. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.771 C o.801 C 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.471 A 0.561 A 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.381 A 0.29 A 48. MacArthur Bl. & Bison Av. 0.78 C 0.80 C 49. MacArhtur BI. & Ford RdJBonita Canyon Dr. 0.77 C 1.06 F 50,MacArthur BI. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.77 C 1.04 F 51. MacArthur BI. & San Miguel Dr. 0.63 B 0177 C 52. MacArthur BI. & Coast Hw. 0.74 C 0.83 D 53. SR-73 NB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.69 B 0,531 A 54. SR-73 SB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr, 0.451 A 0.59 A 55. San Miguel Dr. & Spyglass Hill Rd, 0.30 A 0.38 A 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd. & San Miguel Dr. 0.52 A 0.68 B 57. Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw, 1.08 F 0.79 C 58. Marguerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.38 A 0.51 A 59.Mar ucrite Av. & Coast Hw. 0.90 D 0.91 E 60. Spyglass Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0,60 A 0.461 A 61. Poppy Av. & Coast Hw. 0.671 B 0.76 C 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Rams 0.54 A 0.40 A 64. Newport Coast Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.63 B 0.47 A 65. Newport Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.57 A 0.60 A IDNE = Does Not Exist U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xlsjT3-13 3-32 WITH EXHIBIT 3-D CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN 6 LEGEND: "E = AM LOS "E" ' = PM LOS "E" •LOS = AM LO = AM LOS "F" ,= PM LOS "F" > PACIFIC OCEAN -= LOS "F" California-01232:85 rev:04/25J05 URBAN • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/Jamboree Road (EW) (AM/PM) • Jamboree Road (NS)/Bristol Street South (EW) (AM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/Ford Road/Bonita Canyon Drive (EW) (PM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/San Joaquin Hills Road (EW) (PM) • Goldenrod Avenue (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM) • Marguerite Avenue (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (PM) The only intersection that experiences a deficiency with the constrained network that did not experience one before is Tustin Avenue (NS) at Coast Highway (EW). The new deficiency is caused by the reduction in lanes on Coast Highway in Mariner's Mile. Three additional locations experience deficiencies in the other peak hour (although for one location, the AM peak hour deficiency goes away), and _one changes from LOS "E' to LOS " P. Intersection analysis has been performed to determine the additional improvements necessary to provide acceptable levels of service. ICU worksheets are included in Appendix "J". Table 3-14 compares the ICU results with and without additional improvements. Additional improvements necessary to provide acceptable levels of service are shown in Table 3-15. Improvements have been developed that provide acceptable operations at all potentially deficient intersections. The feasibility of the necessary improvements is questionable at some locations (particularly where additional through lanes are necessary). 3-34 TABLE 3-14 (PAGE 1 OF 2) CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS/EW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR ADOPTED FORECAST WITH IMPROVEMENTS DELTA I ADOPTED I FORECAST WITH IMPROVEMENTS DELTA 1. Bluff Rd. & Coast Hw. 1.27 0.76 -0.511 1.29 0.88 -0.41 2. Superior Av. & Placentia Av. 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.82 0.82 0.00 3. Superior Av. & Coast Hw. 1.01 0.84 -0.17 0.99 0.87 -0.12 4. Newport Bl. & Hos ital Rd. 0.79 0.85 0.06 0.97 0.84 -0.13 5. Newport Bl. & Via Lido 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.00 6. Newport BI. & 32nd St. 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.00 7. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. 1.03 0.71 -0.32 1.12 0.77 -0.35 8. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. 1.02 0.71 -0.311 0.85. 0.85 0.00 9. MacArthur BI. & Campus Dr. 0.76 0.73 -0.03 1.25 0.88 -0.37 10. MacArthur Bl. & Birch St. 0.71 0.71 0.00 0.80 0.80 0.00 11. Von Kartnan Av. & Campus Dr. 0.66 0.62 -0.04 0.93 0.89 -0.04 12. MacArthur BI. & Von Karmen Av. 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.00 13. Jamboree Rd. & Campus Dr. 0.92 0.89 -0.03 1.24 0:86 -0.38 14. Jamboree Rd. & Birch St. 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.80 0.80 0.00 15. Campus Dr. & Bristol St. 0.96 0.89 -0.071 1.08 0.85 -0.23 16, Birch St. & Bristol St. 0.92 0.78 -0.14 0.72 0.71 -0.01 17. Campus Dr./Irvine Av. & Bristol St. S 0.93 0.87 -0.06 0.77 0.77 0.00 18. Birch St. & Bristol St. S 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.531 0.53 0.00 19. Irvine Av. & Mesa Dr. 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.90 0.90 0.00 20. Irvine Av. & University Dr. 1.14 0.74 -0.40 1.19 0.83 -0.36 21. Irvine Av. & Sandi o Dr. 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.00 22. Irvine Av. & Highland Dr. 0.61 0.61 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.00 24.IrvineAv. &WestcliffDr. 0.67 0.67 0.00 0.82 0.82 0.00 25. Dover Dr. & Westcliff Dr. 0.39 0.39 0.001 0.56 0.56 0.00 26. Dover Dr. & 16th St. 0.64 0.64 0.001 0.64 0.64 0.00 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.86 0.86 0.00 0.90 0.90 0.00 28. Bo side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.83 0.81 -0.02 0.94 0.88 -0.06 29. MacArthur BL & Jamboree Rd. 0.96 0.75 -0.21 0.99 0.82 -0.17 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.69 0.69 0.00 31. Bayview Pl. & Bristol St. S 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 32. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. S 0.96 0.74 -0.22 0.851 0.80 -0.05 33, Jamboree Rd. & Bayview W . 0.48 0.481 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.00 34. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr. /University Dr. 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.69 0.69 0.00. 35. Jamboree Rd. & Bison Av. 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 36. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr./Ford Rd. 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.00 37. Jamboree Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.61 0.61 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.00 3-35 Il TABLE 3.14 (PAGE 2 OF 2) ' CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS/EW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR ADOPTED FORECAST WITH IMPROVEMENTS I DELTA ADOPTED FORECAST WITH IMPROVEMENTS DELTA 38. Jamboree ltd. & Santa Barbara Dr. 0.55 0,55 .0.01 0.71 0.71 0.00 39. Jamboree Rd. do Coast Hw. 0.85 0.85 0.00 0.89 0.89 0.00 40. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 41. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 039 0.39 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.00 42. Newport Centcr Dr, & Coast Hw. 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.79 0.79 0,00 45. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. , 0.77 0.771 0.00 0.80 0.80 0100 46. SR-73 NB Rams & Bison Av. 0.47 0.471 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.00 47. SR-73 SB Rams & Bison Av. 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 48. MacArthur Bl. & Bison Av. 0:78 0.78 0.00 0.80 0.80 0,00 49. MacArthur Bl. & Ford RdJBonita Canyon Dr. 0.77 0.72 -O,OS 1.061 0.86 -0.20 50. MacArthur Bl. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.77 0.66 .0.11 1.04 0.84 -0.20 51. MacArthur 131. & San Miguel Dr. 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.77 0.77 0.00 52. MacArthur BI. & Coast Hw. 0.74 0.74 0.00 0.83 0.83 0.00 53. SR-73 NB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.53 0.53 0.00 54. SR-73 SB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.45 OAS 0.00 0.59 0.59 0.00 55. San Miguel Dr. & Spyglass Hill Rd. 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.00 56.San Joaquin Hills Rd, & San Miguel Dr. 0.52 0.52 0.001 0.68 0.68 0.00 57, Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw. 1.08 0,86 -0.28 0.79 0.79 0.00 58. Marguerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.38 0,38 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.00 59.Mar uerite Av. & Coast Hw. 0,90 0.90 0.00 0.91 0.80 -0.11 60. Spyglass Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.60 0.60 0.06 0.46 0.46 0.00 61. Poppy Av. & Coast Htv. 0.67 0.67 O.00 . 0.76 0.76 0.00 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Rams 6.54 0.54 0.00 040 0.40 0.00 64. Ne ort Coast Dr, & Son Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.63 0.63 0.00 0!47 0.47 0.00 G5. Ne ort Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.57 0.57 0.00 0.601 0.60 0,00 U:\UcJobs\ 0i200\01232\Exce1\(01232-18.Ws)T3-14 3-36 M M M M M M= MI M M I• M M= M w w J TABLE 3-15 (PAGE 1 OF 2) CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT Bluff Rd. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Provide 1st SB right turn lane. Continue to allow right turn movement from SB through lane. Change N/S phasing to Split. Provide 2nd EB left turn lane. Provide 4th and 5th EB through lane. Provide 4th WB through lane. Superior Av. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Provide 1st NB right turn lane. Provide 4th EB through lane. Provide 5th WB through lane. Newport BI. (NS) at Hospital Rd. (EW) Provide 2nd NB left turn lane. Eliminate 1st NB right turn lane. Restripe 2nd WB through lane to shared through left lane. Change ENV phasing to Split. Riverside Av. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Provide SB free right turn lane. Provide 2nd EB left turn lane. Provide 3rd EB through lane. Provide 4th WB through lane. Eliminate WB right turn lane. Tustin Av. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Provide 3rd EB through lane. MacArthur BI. NS at Campus Dr. (EW) Provide SB free right turn lane in unincorporated County). Von Karmen Av. (NS) at Campus Dr. (EW) t turn lane in Irvine). Jamboree Rd. (NS) at Campus Dr. (EW) Provide NB free right turn lane. Provide 4th SB through lane (in Irvine). Provide 1st SB right turn lane (in Irvine). Provide 3rd EB left turn lane (in Irvine). Provide WB free right turn lane. Campus Dr. (NS) at Bristol St. N (EW) Provide SB shared through right lane. Provide 5th WB through lane. Provide 1st WB right turn lane. Birch St. (NS) at Bristol St. N (EW) Provide 3rd NB through lane. Provide 1st WB right turn lane. Cam us Dr./Irvine Av. NS at Bristol St. S EW Provide 1st NB right turn lane. w w 00 TABLE 3-15 (PAGE 2 OF 2) CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT Irvine Av. (NS) at University Dr. (EW) Provide 3rd NB through lane. Provide 3rd SB through lane. Restripe 2nd EB through lane to shared through left lane. Change ENV phasing to Split. Bayside Dr. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Restripe SB through lane to shared through left lane. Convert SB defacto to 1st SB right turn lane. Install SB right turn overlap phasing. Provide 1st WB right tum lane. MacArthur BI. (NS) at Jamboree Rd. (EW) Provide 4th NB through lane. Provide 4th EB through lane. Provide 3rd WB-left turn lane. Jamboree Rd. NS at Bristol St. S (EW) Provide 2nd EB left turn lane. MacArthur BI. (NS) at Ford RdJBonita Canyon Dr. (EW) Provide 3rd SS left turn -lane. Eliminate SB free right turn lane. Restri a 2nd EB left tum-lane to through lane. MacArthur BI. (NS) at San Joaquin Hills Rd. (EW) Eliminate 2nd NB left turn lane. Provide 4th NB through lane. Provide 3rd EB left turn lane. Goldenrod Av. NS at Coast Hw. EW Provide3rd WB through lane. Eiminate WB defacto ri httum lane. Marguerite Av. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Provide 3rd EB through lane. Eliminate EB right turn lane. U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\ExcelX[01232-18.xis)T3-15 M I1 1 4.0 TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (POST-2025) ALTERNATIVE WITH OPEN SPACE NETWORK SCENARIO This chapter presents true minimum alternative (as defined in the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) alternatives) General Plan Buildout (Post-2025) conditions. General Plan Buildout model inputs are discussed and refined forecast volumes are presented. Data are compared to existing conditions to show reasonable growth and to currently adopted General Plan conditions (as defined in Chapter 3 of this report) results to show differences from the currently adopted General Plan. The only roadway system change occurs in Banning Ranch where the roadway system has been removed, consistent with the open space land use designation. 4.1 Land Use and Socioeconomic Data (SED) This section discusses the land use and socioeconomic data inputs. 4.1.1 True Minimum General Plan Buildout Land Use Data The True Minimum General Plan Buildout land use data was provided to Urban Crossroads, Inc. staff by City staff and the City's General Plan consultant, EIP Associates. Appendix "K" of this report documents the explicit land use data included in NBTM 3.1 for true minimum General Plan Buildout conditions in this analysis. Table 4-1 summarizes the overall true minimum General Plan Buildout land uses for the City of Newport Beach. Appendix "L" contains the land use changes by TAZ compared to the currently adopted General Plan scenario. Land uses have changed based on data provided by the City. The largest reductions in land use, compared to currently adopted General Plan conditions, occur in Banning Ranch and Cannery Village. Table 4-2 shows true minimum General Plan Buildout land use growth from existing. Medium density residential and apartments each grow by more than 2,000 dwelling units. Categories that grow by more than 500,000 square feet include general commercial and general office. I 4-1 TABLE 4-1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE COMPARISON NBTM CODE 1 DESCRIPTION UNITSZ ADOPTED QUANTITY TRUE MINIMUM QUANTITY CHANGE %CHANGE 1 Low Density Residential DU 18,347 17,838 509 -2.77% 2 Medium Density Residential DU 12,859 12,835 24 -0.19% 3 Apartment DU 13,374 11,657 1,717 -12.84% 4 Elderly Residential DU 200 200 0.00% 5 Mobile Home DU 455 455 0.00% TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DU 45,235 42,985 2,250 -4.97% 6 Motel ROOM 139 194 55 39.57% 7 Hotel ROOM 3,387 3,387 0.00% 9 Regional Commercial TSF 1,633.840 1,633.840 0.00% 10 General Commercial TSF 4,627.760 4,270.152 357.608 -7.73% 11 Commerciai/Recreation ACRE 5.100 5.100 0.00% 13 Restaurant TSF 198.780 198.780 0.00% 15 Fast Food Restaurant TSF 13.940 13.940 0.00% 16 Auto Dealer/Sales TSF 227.170 227.170 0.00% 17 1 Yacht Club TSF 70.310 70.310 0.00% 18 Health Club TSF 61.330 61.330 0.00% 19 Tennis Club CRT 59 59 0.00% 20 Marina SLIP 1,055 1,055 0.00% 21 Theater SEAT 5,475 5,475 0.00% 22 Newport Dunes ACRE 64.00 64.00 0.00% 23 General Office TSF 12,305.620 11,924,379 381.241 -3.10% 24 Medical/Government Office TSF 910.616 848.986 61.630 -6.77% 25 Research & Development TSF 81.730 81.730 0.00% 26 Industrial TSF 1,956.092 1,099.427 856.665 -43.79% 27 Mini-Storage/Warehouse TSF 196A20 196.420 0.00% 28 Pre-school/Day Care TSF 56,770 56.770 - 0.00% 29 Elementary/Private School STU 4,455 4.455 0.00% 30 Junior/High School STU 4,765 4,765 0.00% 31 Cultural/Leaming Center TSF 40.000 40.000 0.00% 32 Library TSF 78.840 1 78.840 0.00% 33 Post Office TSF 73,700 73.700 0.00% 34 Hospital BED 1,265 1,265 - 0.00% 35 Nursin /Conv. Home BEDS 661 602 59 -8.93% 36 Church TSF 467.210 467.210 0.00% 37 Youth Ctr./Service TSF 166.310 166.310 0.00% 38 Park ACRE 94,920 92.250 2.670 -2.81% 39 Regional Park ACRE 45.910 45.910 0.00% 40 Golf Course ACRE 298.290 298.29D 0.00% 1 Uses 8, 12, and 14 are part of the old NBTAM model structure and are not currently Utilized in the City land use datasets. 2 Units Abbreviations: DU = Dwelling Units TSF = Thousand Square Feet CRT = Court STU = Students U.\UcJob3\ 01200101232VExceR[01232-16.xlsJT4-1 4-2 ' TABLE 4-2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE GROWTH FROM EXISTING NBTM CODE' DESCRIPTION UNITS z 2002 QUANTITY TRUE MINIMUM QUANTITY I GROWTH % GROWTH 1 Low Density Residential DU 17,124 17,838 714 4.17% 2 Medium Densi Residential DU 9,535 12,835 3,300 34.61% 3 Apartment DU 91199 11,657 2,458 26.72% 4 ElderlyResidential DU 200 200 0.00% 5 Mobile Home DU 600 455 145 -24.17% TOTAL DWELLING U 1 36,658 42,985 6,327 17.26% 6 Motel ROOM 134 194 60 44.78% 7 Hotel ROOM 2,821 3,387 566 20.06% 9 Regional Commercial TSF 1,259.000 1,633.840 374.840 29.77% 10 General Commercial TSF 3,696.781 4,270.152 573.371 15.51% 11 Commercial/Recreation ACRE 5.100 5.100 0.00% 13 Restaurant TSF 99.370 198.780 99.410 100.04% 15 Fast Food Restaurant TSF 13.940 13.940 - 0.00% 16 Auto Dealer/Sales TSF 172.420 227.170 54.750 31.75% 17 1 Yacht Club TSF 51.830 70.310 18.480 35.66% 18 Health Club TSF 16.770 61.330 45 265.71% 19 Tennis Club CRT 60 59 1 -1.67% 20 Marina SLIP 1,055 1,055 0.00% 21 Theater SEAT 5,489 5,475 14 -0.26% 22 Newport Dunes ACRE 64.00 64.00 - 0.00% 23 General Office TSF 10,865.733 11,924.379 1,058.646 9.74% 24 Medical/Government Office TSF 795.926 848.986 53.060 6.67% 25 1 Research & Development TSF 81.730 81.730 - 0.00% 26 Industrial TSF 1,291.079 1,099.427 191.652 -14.84% 27 Mini-Storage/Warehouse TSF 196.420 196.420 0.00% 28 Pre-school/Day Care TSF 55.820 56.770 0.950 1.70% 29 Elementary/Private School STU 4,399 4,455 56 1.28% 30 Junior/High School STU 4,765 4,765 0.00% 31 Cultural/Learning Center TSF 35.000 40.000 5.000 14.29% 32 Library TSF 78.840 78.840 0.00% 33 Post Office TSF 53.700 73.700 20.000 37.24% 34 Hospital BED 351 1,265 914 260.40% 35 Nursin /Conv. Home BEDS 661 602 59 -8.93% 36 Church TSF 377.760 467.210 89.450 23.68% 37 Youth Ctr./Service TSF 149.560 166.310 16.750 11.20% 38 Park ACRE 113.970 92.250 21.720 19.06% 39 Regional Park ACRE - 45.910 45.9101 /A 40 Golf Course ACRE 305.330 298.290 7.04 -2.31% 1 Uses 8,12, and 14 are part of the old NBTA the City land use datasets. 2 Units Abbreviations: DU = Dwelling Units TSF = Thousand Square Feet CRT = Court STU = Students ' U:\UcJobs\_01200\01232\ExceR[01232-18.xlsIT4-2 1 4.2 Ic�3 4.1.2 General Plan Buildout Socioeconomic Data (SED) r General Plan Buildout SED that has been converted from land use is summarized in Table 4-3. Table 4-3 also contains a comparison of true minimum General Plan Buildout SED to existing SED for the City of Newport Beach. The total number of dwelling units are projected to grow by 5,897 units (17 %) from existing conditions. For total employment, an increase of 10,999 employees (17%) is anticipated. Socioeconomic data for the remainder of the primary modeling area (and for Newport Coast, where land use data was unavailable) has been unchanged from the currently adopted General Plan data. Trip Generation Table 4-4 summarizes the overall trip generation for. the True Minimum Alternative General Plan Buildout conditions for the City of Newport Beach and compares it to existing conditions trip generation. Appendix "M" contains a report of trip generation by NBTM TAZ for the City of Newport Beach. Most of these trips have been calculated from the final General Plan Buildout SED presented previously. Supplemental trips are unchanged from the previously published data. The overall trip generation for the City of Newport Beach is an estimated 842,368 daily vehicle trips. Table 4-5 compares true minimum General Plan buildout trip generation to currently adopted General Plan buildout trip generation. Total trip generation decreases by approximately 37,391 daily trips (4.25%). Trip generation has decreased primarily in Banning Ranch and Cannery Village. Appendix "N" shows the zone by zone trip generation comparison. Traffic Assignment The roadway system for the True Minimum General Plan alternative is almost identical to the constrained roadway system presented in Chapter 3 of this report. J. TABLE 4-3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH' LAND USE BASED SOCIOECONOMIC DATA SUMMARY/COMPARISON VARIABLE 2002 QUANTITY TRUE MINIMUM QUANTITY GROWTH % GROWTH Occupied Single Family Dwelling Units 15,9701 16,707 737 5% Occupied Multi -Family Dwelling Units 18,2941 23,454 5,160 28% TOTAL OCCUPIED DWELLING UNITS 34,2641 40,161 5,897 17% Group Quarters Population 6611 661 0 0% Population 75,2111 87,343 12,132 16% Employed Residents 44,635 51,993 7,358 16% Retail Employees 1 10,9701 12,942 1,972 18% Service Employees 1 17,295 20,706 3,411 20% Other Employees 1 36,990 42,606 5,616 15% TOTAL EMPLOYEES 65,255 76,254 10,999 17% Elem/Hi h School Students 9,164 9,2201 56 1% Includes data converted from land use only. Excludes Newport Coast and recent annexation. areas. U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\ExceN[01232-18.xls]T4-3 II 1 4=5 I TABLE 4.4 ' CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TRUE MINIMUM TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ' TRIP PURPOSE DAILY TRIP ENDS GROWTH PERCENT GROWTH EXISTING TRUE MINIMUM GENERALPLAN BUILDOUT Home Based Work Productions 57,819 70,754 12,935 22.37% Home Based Work Attractions 81,964 97,510 15,546 18.97% Home Based School Productions 11,336 13,949 2,613 23.05% Home Based School Attractions 8,730 8,845 115 1.32% Home Based Other Productlons4 127,338 168,175 40,837 32.07% Home Based Other Attractions 109,815 131,960 22,145 20.17% Work Based Other Productions 52,1521 62,537 0,3851 19.91% Work Based Other Attractions 57,035 68,034 10,999 19.28% Other - Other Productions 91,218 111,105 19,887 21.80% Other - Other Attractions 89,7341 109,499 19,7651 22.03% TOTAL PRODUCTIONS 339,8631 426,5201 86,6571 25.50% TOTAL ATTRACTIONS 1 347,2781 415,8481 68,5701 19.74% OVERALL TOTAL 1 687,1411 842,3681 155,227 22.59'/a 1 Home -Work includes Home -Work and Home -University trips, consistent with OCTAM mode.choice output. , 2 Home -Other includes Home -Shop and Home -Other trips, consistent with OCTAM mode choice output. ' UAUcJobs\ 012001012321Excell[01232-1B.xls]T4-4 11 TABLE 4-5 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TRUE MINIMUM TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON TRIP PURPOSE DAILY TRIP ENDS GROWTH PERCENT GROWTH CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT TRUE MINIMUM GENERALPLAN BUILDOUT Home Based Work Productions 73,968 70,754 -3,214 -4.35% Home Based Work Attractions 102,230 97,510 -4,720 -4.62% Home Based School Productions 14,475 13,949 -526 -3.63% Home Based School Attractions 8,845 8,845 0 0.00% Home Based Other Productions' 174,257 168,175 -6,082 -3.49% Home Based Other Attractions 138,334 131,960 -6,374 -4.61% Work Based Other Productions 65,482 62,537 -2,945 -4.50% Work Based Other Attractions 71,335 68,034 -3,301 -4.63% Other - Other Productions 116,275 111,105 -5.170 -4.45% Other - Other Attractions 114,558 109,499 -5,059 -4.42% TOTAL PRODUCTIONS 444,4571 426,520 -17,937 -4.04% TOTAL ATTRACTIONS 435,3021 415,848 -19,454 OVERALL TOTAL 879,7591 842,368 -37,391 1 Home -Work Includes Home -Work and Home -University trips, consistent with OCTAM mode choice output. 2 Home -Other Includes Home -Shop and Home -Other trips, consistent with OCTAM mode choice output. U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\101232-18.xls1T4-5 4-7 The only change is the removal of the roadway system in Banning Ranch, consistent with the open space designation included in the true minimum alternative, Exhibit 4-A summarizes the NBTM 3.1 refined True Minimum General Plan Alternative with open space,network daily traffic volumes throughout the City of Newport Beach. Changes from the currently adopted General Plan Baseline forecasts are shown on Table 4-6. Volume changes occur primarily because of land use changes in Banning Ranch and Cannery Village. Roadways that experience the largest decreases (other than roads eliminated altogether) include Coast Highway and Newport Boulevard. Table 4-7 compares these refined forecasts to existing counted volumes (presented in the General Plan Baseline document). The highest daily traffic volume increases occur on Campus Drive, Coast Highway, Jamboree Road, MacArthur Boulevard, and Newport Center Drive. Each of these facilities experience an increase in excess of 10,000 vehicles per day, although none experiences the 15,000 VPD increase anticipated for currently adopted General Plan conditions. Daily CaoacitV Analysis Daily roadway segment capacity analysis has been performed at study area roadways, and is shown on Exhibit 4-B. The following roadway segments are expected to operate with daily V/C greater than 0.90: • Newport Boulevard north of Via Lido • Jamboree Road north of Campus Drive • Jamboree Road north of Birch Street • Irvine Avenue north of University Drive • Irvine Avenue north of Santiago Drive • Irvine Avenue north of Highland Drive • Irvine Avenue north of Dover Drive EN EXHIBIT 4-A TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE 139 3179 162 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) 31 II \ 31 1.f 27 3�y 5 -"56 -' 37 16 S 1 5 8 6 i m 40 41 uw 10 v 18 10 3 2 40 3 (` �� > 1P 32 1 14 MD ar 6 4 31 l 12 10 6 7 3 2 121 @ 32 yam er 25 r j 11 % 17 > � I 28 a 32 irtx n wesranr / ~\,7 19 15 00. 24 f mx sr 13 ) 6 63 5 6 28 � ismn 3 12 19 45 `\-76 3 10 4 17 11 70. f5 14 17 2 12 3 S 43 22 26 22 3 14 5 71 36 sy m 5 16 24 t� rr aP 1 20 41 17 5 38 17 0 ' 10 50 44 �asxvuv 42 2 46 15 _ - yCa T. 124 42 28 18 52 6s/`58 LEGEND: 28 52 1 f.. . 39 _ � 10 - VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'5) 19 37 0 3 PACIFIC 55 �ea�x 6 30 ; %" OCEAN NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE.Nel4mort Beach.Califomia-01232•BOmin2 mxd URBAN [l TABLE 4.6 (PAGE 1 OF 4) TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON ' LOCATION ADOPTED (CONSTRAINED) BUILDOUT I FORECAST I CHANGE % CHANGE 16th St (Irvine Ave. to Dover Dr.) 6,000 6,000 0 0.0% 32nd St. (west of Newport Blvd.) 9,000 8,000 -1,000 -11.1% 32nd St. (east of Newport Blvd.) 5,000 3,000 -2,000 40.0% Avocado Ave. (north of San Miguel Dr.) 5,000 5,000 0 0.0% Avocado Ave.(south-of San Miguel Dr.) 12,000 11,000 -1,000 -8.3% Avocado Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% Balboa Blvd. (south of Coast Hwy.) 22,000 19,000 -3,000 -13.6% Bayside Dr. (south of Coast Hwy.) 12,000 12,000 0 0.0% Birch St. (Jamboree Rd. to Von Karman Ave.) 18,000 18,000 0 0.0% Birch St (Von Kaman Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 20,000 20,000 0 0.0% Birch St. (west of MacArthur Blvd.) 20,000 20,000 0 0.0% Birch St (north of Bristol St. North) 27,000 27,000 0 0.0% Birch St. (Bristol St North to Bristol St. South) 20,000 20,000 0 0.0% Birch St (south ofBristol St. South) 16,000 16,000 0 0.0% Bison Ave. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 17,000 17,000 0 0.0% Bison Ave. (MacArthur Blvd. to SR-73 Fwy.) 11,000 11,000 0 0.0% Bluff Rd. (Coast Hwy. to 15th St.) 13,000 0 -13,000 -100% Bluff Rd. (15th St. to 17th St.) 13,000 0 -13,000 -100% Bluff Rd. (17th St. to 19th St.) 12,000 0 -12,000 .1000/0 Bonita Canyon Dr. (east of MacArthur Blvd.) 34,000 34,000 0 0.0% Bonita Canyon Dr. (west of SR-73 Fwy.) 27,000 27,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. North (west of Campus Dr.) 32,000 32,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. North (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 28,000 28,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. North (east of Birch St.) 27,000 27,000 0 0.0% Bristol St Notch (west of Jamboree Rd.) 18,000 18,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. South (west of Campus DrArvine Ave.) 32,000 32,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. South (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 23,000 22,000 .1,000 4.3% Bristol St South (east of Birch St,) 22,000 21,000 -1,000 4.5% Bristol St South (west of Jamboree Rd.) 37,000 37,000 0 0.0% Campus Dr. (Jamboree Rd. to Von Kaman Ave.) 22,000 21,000 -1,000 4.5% Campus Dr. (Von Kaman Ave. to MacArthur' Blvd.) 31,000 31,000 0 0.0% Campus Dr. (west of MacArthur Blvd.) 39,000 39,000 0 0.0% Campus Dr. (north of Bristol St. North) 39,000 38,000 -1,000 -2.6% Campus Dr. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 40,000 40,000 0 0.0% CoastHwy. (west of Superior AveJBalbon Blvd.) 61,000 55,000 -6,000 -%8% Coast Hwy. (Superior Ave. to Newport Blvd.) 41,000 39,000 -2,000 -4.9% Coast Hwy. (Newport Blvd. to Riverside Ave.) 68,000 66,000 -2,000 -2.9% Coast Hwy. (Riverside Ave, to Tustin Ave.) 59,000 56,000 -3,000 -5.1% Coast Hwy. Tustin Ave. to Dover Dr. 55,000 54,000 -1000 -1.8% 4-10 L1 TABLE 4.6 (PAGE 2 OF 4) ' TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON LOCATION ADOPTED (CONSTRAINED) 78,000 64,000 BUILDOUT FORECAST 76,000 63,000 CHANGE -2,000 -1,000 CHANGE -2.6% -1.6% Coast Hwy. (Dover Dr. to Bayside Dr.) Coast Hwy. (Bayside Dr. to Jamboree Rd.) 51,000 50,000 -1,000 -2.0% Coast Hwy. (Jamboree Rd. to Newport Center Dr.) 43,000 42,000 1,000 2.3% Coast Hwy. (Newport Center Dr. to Avocado Ave.) 45,000 44,000 1,000 2.2% Coast Hwy. (Avocado Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 48,000 46,000 -2,000 -4.2% Coast Hwy. (MacArthur Blvd. to Goldenrod Ave.) 46,000 45,000 .1,000 -2.2%,000 Coast Hwy. (Goldenrod Ave. to Marguerite Ave.) 4242,000 42,000 42,000 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. (Marguerite Ave. to Poppy Ave.) 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. (Poppy Ave. to Newport Coast Dr.) 44,000 44,000 0 0.0% Coast Hwy (east of Newport Coast Dr.) 11,000 11,000 0 0.0% Dover Dr. (Irvine Ave. to Westcliff Dr.) 24,000 24,000 0 0.00 Dover Dr. (Westcliff Dr. to 16th St.) 28,000 28,000 0 0.0% Dover Dr. (16th St. to Cliff Dr.) 33 0 0.0%,000 Dover Dr. (Cliff Dr. to Coast Hwy.) 10,000,000 110,000 0 0.0% Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at University Dr.) 1 0 0.0% Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at Ford Rd.) 1155,000 ,000 13,000 13,000 0 0.0% Ford Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 4,000 2,000 -2,000 -50.0% Goldenrod Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 2,000 0 0.0% Highland Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 18,000 18,000 0 0.0% Hospital Rd. (Placentia Ave. to Newport Blvd.) 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% Hospital Rd. (east of Newport Blvd.) 38,000 37,000 -1,000 -2.6% Irvine Ave. (Bristol St. South to Mesa Dr.) 41,000 40,000 -1,000 -2.4% Irvine Ave. (Mesa Dr. to University Dr.) 40,000 40,000 0 0.00 Irvine Ave. (University Dr. to Santa Isabel Ave.) 33,000 32,000 1,000 3.0% Irvine Ave. (Santa Isabel Ave. to Santiago Dr.) 32,000 32,000 0 0.0% Irvine Ave. (Santiago Dr. to Highland Dr.) ,000 0 0.0% Irvine Ave. (Highland Dr. to Dover Dr.) 28,000 28,000 0 0.0% Irvine Ave. (Dover Dr. to Westcliff Dr.) 3,000 1 13 ,000 0 0.0% Irvine Ave. (Westcliff Dr. to 16th St.) ,000 47,000 47,000 0 0.0% Jamboree Rd. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 54,000 54,000 0 0.0% Jamboree Rd. (Birch St. to MacArthur Blvd.) 43,000 43,000 0 0.0% Jamboree Rd. (MacArthur Blvd. to Bristol St. North) 51,000 52,000 1,000 2.0% Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 56,000 0 0.0% Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St. South to Bayview WY-) 56,000 56,000 0 0.0% Jamboree Rd. (Bayview WY. to University Dr.) 56,000 41,000 41,000 0 0.0% Jamboree Rd. (University Dr. to Bison Ave.) 45,000 45,000 0 0.0%. Jamboree Rd. (Bison Ave, to Ford Rd.) 55,000 55,000 0 0.00/C Jamboree Rd. (Ford Rd. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 43,000 0 0.0% Jamboree Rd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to Santa Barbara Dr.) 43,000 42,000 0 0.0%15,000 Jamboree Rd. (Santa Barbara Dr. to Coast Hwy.) 42,000 15,000 0 0.0% Jamboree Rd. ( Coast Hwy. to Bayside Dr.) 33,000 0 0.0% MacArthur Blvd. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 33,000 26,000 0 0.0% MacArthur Blvd. (Birch St. to Von Karmen Ave.) 26,000 32,000 0 0.0% MacArthur Blvd. Von Kerman Ave. to Jamboree Rd.) 32,000 I TABLE 4.6 (PAGE 3 OF 4) ' TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON LOCATION ADOPTED (CONSTRAINED) BUILDOUT I FORECAST I CHANGE % CHANGE MacArthur Blvd. (south of Jamboree Rd.) 35,000 35,000 0 0.0% MacArthur Blvd. (north of Bison Ave.) 74,000 74,000 0 0.0% MacArthur Blvd. (Bison Ave. to Ford Rd.) 74,000 73,000 -1,000 -1.4% MacArthur Blvd. (Ford Rd. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 60,000 60,000 0 0.0% MacArthur Blvd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to San Miguel Rd.) 39,000 38,000 -1,000 -2.6% MacArthur Blvd. (San Miguel Rd, to Coast Hwy.) 38,000 38,000 0 0.0% Marguerite Ave. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 8,000 7,000 -1,000 -12.5% Marguerite Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 7,000 6,000 -1,000 -14.3% Mesa Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 13,000 13,000 0 0.0% Newport Blvd. (north of Hospital Rd.) 46,000 45,000 -1,000 -2.2% Newport Blvd. (HospitalRd, to Coast Hwy.) 54,000 52,000 -2,000 -3.7% Newport Blvd. (Coast Hwy. to Via Lido) 57,000 52,000 -5,000 -8.8% Newport Blvd. (Via Lido to 32nd St.) 41,000 37,000 -4,000 -9.8% Newport Blvd. (south of 32nd St.) 33,000 30,000 -3,000 -9.1 % Newport Center Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 17,000 17,000 0 0.0% Newport Coast Dr. (SR-73 Fwy. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 29,000 29,000 0 0.0% Newport Coast Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 24,000 24,000 0 0.0% Newport CoastDr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 19,000 18,000 -1,000 -5.3% Placentia Ave. (north of Superior Ave.) 16,000 17,000 1,000 6.3% Placentia Ave. (Superior Ave. to Hospital Rd.) 11,000 11,000 0 0.0% Poppy Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 2,000 0 0.0% Riverside Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to Santa Cruz Rd.) 17,000 17,000 0 0.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Cruz Rd. to Santa Rosa Rd.) 12,000 12,000 0 0.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Rosa Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 26,000 26,000 0 0.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (MacArthur Blvd. to San Miguel Rd.) 22,000 22,000 0 0.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (San Miguel Rd, to Marguerite Ave.) 24,000 24,000 0 0.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Marguerite Ave, to Spyglass Hill Rd.) 19,000 18,000 -1,000 -5.3% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Spyglass Hill Rd, to Newport Coast Dr.) 19,000 18,000 -1,000 -5.3% San Miguel Dr. (north of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% San,Miguel Dr. (south of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 10,000 10,000 0 0,0% San Miguel Dr. (north of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 14,000 14,000 0 0.0% San Miguel Dr. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to MacArthurBlvd.) 16,000 16,000 0 0.0% San -Miguel Dr. (MacArthur Blvd. to Avocado Ave.) 20,000 20,000 0 0.0% San Miguel Dr. (west of Avocado Ave.) 11,000 11,000 0 0.0% Santa Barbara Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 11,000 11,000 0 0.0% Santa Cruz Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 9,000 8,000 -1,000 -11.1% Santa Rosa Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 14,000 14,000 0 0.06/0 Santiago Dr. (Tustin Ave. to Irvine Ave.) 6,000 6,000 0 0.0% Santiago Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 4,000 4,000 0 0.0% Spyglass Hill Rd. (San Miguel Dr. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 4,000 4,000 0 0.0% Superior Ave, (north of Placentia Ave,) 19,000 19,000 0 0.0% Superior Ave. (Placentia Ave. to Hospital Rd.) 28,000 28,000 0 0,0% Superior Ave, (Hospital Rd. to Coast Hwy . 28,000 28,000 0 1 0.0% 4-12 II ' TABLE 4-6 (PAGE 4 OF 4) TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON ADOPTED BUILDOUT I LOCATION (CONSTRAINED) FORECAST CHANGE CHANGE Tustin Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 3,000 3,000 0 0.0°/u University Dr. (cast of Irvine Ave.) 3,000 3,000 0 0.0% University Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 15,000 15,000 0 0.0% Via Lido (east of Newport Blvd.) 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% Von Karman Ave. (Campus Dr, to Birch St.) 18,000 18,000 0 0.0% Von Karman Ave. (Birch St. to MacArthur Blvd.) 16,000 16,000 0 0.0% WestcliffDr. Irvine Ave. to Dover Dr.) 16,000 16,000 0 0.00 U�\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\(01232-18.xIs]T4-6 1! TABLE 4-7 (PAGE 1 OF 4) 1 TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH j LOCATION EXISTING (200112002) COUNT BUILDOUT FORECAST GROWTH % GROWTH 16th St. (Irvine Ave. to Dover Dr.) 5,000 6,000 1,000 20.0% 32nd St. (west of Newport Blvd.) 8,000 8,000 0 0.0% 32nd St. (east of Newport Blvd.) 3,000 3,000 0 0.0% Avocado Ave. (north of San Miguel Dr.) 5,000 5,000 0 0.0% Avocado Ave. (south of San Miguel'Dr.) 12,000 11,000 -1,000 -8.3% Avocado Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 11,000 10,000 -1,000 -9.1% Balboa Blvd. (south of Coast Hwy.) 18,000 19,000 1,000 5.6% Bayside Dr. (south of Coast Hwy.) 10,000 12,000 2,000 20.0% Birch St. (Jamboree Rd, to Von Karman Ave.) 12,000 18,000 6,000 50.0% Birch St. (Von Karman Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 15,000 20,000 5,000 33.3% Birch St. (west of.MacArthur Blvd.) 16,000 20,000 4,000 25.0% Birch St. (north of Bristol St. North) 23,000 27,000 4,000 17.4% Birch St. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 19,000 20,000 1,000 5.3% Birch St. (south of Bristol St. South) 15,000 16,000 1,000 6.7% Bison Ave. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 13,000 17,000 4,000 30.8% Bison Ave. (MacArthur Blvd. to SR-73 Fwy.) 7,000 11,000 4,000 57.1% Bonita Canyon Dr. (east of MacArthur Blvd.) 26,000 34,000 8,000 30.8% Bonita Canyon Dr. (west of SR-73 Fwy.) 17,000 27,000 10,000 58.8% Bristol St. North (west of Campus Dr.) 28,000 32,000 4,000 14.3% Bristol St. North (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 23,000 28,000 5,000 21.7% Bristol St. North (east of Birch St.) 22,000 27,000 5,000 22.7% Bristol St. North (west of Jamboree Rd.) 16,000 18,000 2,000 12.5% Bristol St. South (west of Campus DrArvine Ave.) 28,000 32,000 4,000 14.3% Bristol St. South (Campus Dr, to Birch St.) 17,000 22,000 5,000 29A% Bristol St. South (east of Birch St.) 16,000 21,000 5,000 31.3% Bristol St. South (west of Jamboree Rd.) 31,000 37,000 •6,000 19A% Campus Dr. (Jamboree Rd, to Von Korman Ave.) 16,000 21,000 5,000 31.3% Campus Dr. (Von Karman Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 20,000 31,000 11,000 55.0% Campus Dr. (west of MacArthur Blvd.) 26,000 39,000 13,000 50.0% Campus Dr. (north of Bristol St. North) 28,000 38,000 10,000 35.7% Campus Dr. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 30,000 40,000 10,000 33.3% Coast Hwy. (west ofSuperior Ave.BalboaBlvd.) 46,000 55,000 9,000 19.6% Coast Hwy. (Superior Ave. to Newport Blvd.) 28,000 39,000 11,000 39.3% Coast Hwy. (Newport Blvd. to Riverside Ave,) 53,000 66,000 13,000 24.5% Coast Hwy. (Riverside Ave, to Tustin Ave.) 45,000 56,000 11,000 24.4% Coast Hwy. (Tustin Ave. to Dover Dr.) 42,000 54,000 12,000 28.6% Coast Hwy. (Dover Dr. to Bayside Dr.) 63,000 76,000 13,000 20.6% Coast Hwy. (Bayside Dr. to Jamboree Rd.) 51,000 63,000 12,000 23.5% Coast Hwy. (Jamboree Rd, to Newport Center Dr.) 42,000 50,000 8,000 19.0% Coast H (Newport Center Dr. to Avocado Ave. 35,000 42,000 7,000 1 20.0% 4-14 II TABLE 4-7 (PAGE 2 OF 4) TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH EXISTING (200112002) BUILDOUT % COUNT FORECAST GROWTH GROWTH LOCATION Coast Hwy. (Avocado Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 36,000 44,000 8,000 22.2% 15.0% Coast Hwy. (MacArthur Blvd. to Goldenrod Ave.) 40,000 39,000 46,000 45,000 6,000 6,000 15.4% Coast Hwy. (Goldenrod Ave. to Marguerite Ave.) 35,000 42,000 7,000 20.0% Coast Hwy. (Marguerite Ave. to Poppy Ave.) 28,000 35,000 7,000 25.0% Coast Hwy. (Poppy Ave. to Newport Coast Dr.) 35,000 44',000 9,000 25.7% Coast Hwy (east of Newport Coast Dr.) 9,000 11,000 2,000 22.2% Dover Dr. (Irvine Ave. to WestcliffDr.) 22,000 24,000 2,000 9.1% Dover Dr. (WestcliffDr. to 16th St.) 25,000 28,000 3,000 12.0% Dover Dr. (16th St. to Cliff Dr.) 29,000 33,000 4,000 13.8% Dover Dr. (Cliff Dr. to Coast Hwy.) Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at University Dr.) 10,000 10,000 0 0.0%15,000 Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at Ford Rd.) I5,000 13,000 0 4,000 0.0% 44.4% Ford Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 9,000 2,000 0 0.0% Goldenrod Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 2,000 2,000 0 0.0°/u Highland Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 13,000 I8,000 5,000 38.5% Hospital Rd. (Placentia Ave. to Newport Blvd.) 7,000 10,000 3,000 42.9% Hospital Rd. (east of Newport Blvd.) 27,000 37,000 10,000 37.0% Irvine Ave. (Bristol St. South to Mesa Dr.) 31,000 40,000 9,000 29.0% Irvine Ave. (Mesa Dr. to University Dr.) 33,000 40,000 7,000 21.2% Irvine Ave. (University Dr. to Santa Isabel Ave.) 29,000 32,000 3,000 10.3°/n Irvine Ave. (Santa Isabel Ave. to Santiago Dr.) 27,000 32,000 5,000 18.50/c Irvine Ave. (Santiago Dr. to Highland Dr.) 27,000 32,000 5,000 18.5% Irvine Ave. (Highland Dr. to Dover Dr.) 22,000 28,000 6,000 27.3% Irvine Ave. (Dover Dr. to WestcliffDr.) 12,000 • 13,000 1,000 8.3% Irvine Ave. (WestcliffDr. to 16th St.) 36,000 47,000 I1,000 30.6% Jamboree Rd. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 42,000 54,000 12,000 28.6% Jamboree Rd. (Birch St. to MacArthur Blvd.) 36,000 43,000 7,000 19.40/c Jamboree Rd. (MacArthur Blvd. to Bristol St. North) 47,000 52,000 5,000 10.6°/u Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 47,000 56,000 9,000 19.1% Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St. South to Bayview Wy.) 47,000 56,000 9,000 19.1% Jamboree Rd. (Bayview WY. to University Dr.) 37,000 41,000 4,000 10.8% Jamboree Rd. (University Dr. to Bison Ave.) 39,000 45,000 6,000 15.4% Jamboree Rd. (Bison Ave. to Ford Rd.) Jamboree Rd. (Ford Rd. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 46,000 55,000 9,000 19.6% Jamboree Rd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to Santa Barbara Dr.) 34,000 43,000 9,000 26.5% 31.3% Jamboree Rd. (Santa Barbara Dr. to Coast Hwy.) 32,000 42,000 15,000 10,000 3,000 25.0% Jamboree Rd. ( Coast Hwy. to Bayside Dr.) 12,000 27,000 33,000 6,000 22.2% MacArthur Blvd. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 22,000 26,000 4,000 18.2%' MacArthur Blvd. (Birch St. to Von Karman Ave.) 26,000 32,000 6,000 23.1% MacArthur Blvd. (Von Karman Ave. to Jamboree Rd.) 35,000 8,000 29.6% MacArthur Blvd. (south of Jamboree Rd.) 27,000 13,000 21.3% MacArthur Blvd. (north of Bison Ave.) 61,000 74,000 10,000 15.9% MacArthur Blvd. (Bison Ave. to Ford Rd.) 63,000 73,000 6,000 11.1 % MacArthur Blvd. (Ford Rd. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 54,000 60,000 3,000 8.6% MacArthur Blvd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to San Miguel Rd.) 35,000 38,000 38,000 7,000 22.6% MacArthur Blvd. San Mi uel Rd. to Coast H 31,000 II TABLE 4.7 (PAGE 3 OF 4) TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH ' LOCATION EXISTING (2001/2002) COUNT BUILDOUT FORECAST' GROWTH GROWTH Marguerite Ave. (south of San Joaquin -Hills Rd.) 7,000 7,000 0 0.0% Marguerite Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 6,000 6,000 0 0.0% Mesa Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 12,000 13,000 1,000 8.30% Newport Blvd. (north of Hospital Rd.) 36,000 45,000 9,000 25.0% Newport Blvd. (Hospital Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 43,000 52,000 9,000 20.9% Newport Blvd, (Coast Hwy. to Via Lido) 48,000 52,000 4,000 8.3% Newport Blvd. (Via Lido to 32nd St.) 36,000 37,000 1,000 2.8% Newport Blvd. (south of 32nd St.) 29,000 30,000 1,000 3.4% Newport Center Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 14,000 17,000 3,000 21.4% Newport Coast Dr. (SR-73 Fwy. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 17,000 29,000 12,000 70.6% Newport Coast Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 15,000 24,000 9,000 60.0% Newport Coast Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 12,000 18,000 6,000 50.0% Placentia Ave. (north of Superior Ave.) 12,000 17,000 5,000 41.7% Placentia Ave. (Superior Ave. to Hospital Rd.) 7,000 11,000 4,000 57.1% Poppy Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 2,000 0 0.0% Riverside Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 9,000 10,000 1,000 11.1 % San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to Santa Cruz Rd.) 16,000 17,000 1,000 6.3% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Cruz Rd. to Santa Rosa Rd.) 11,000 12,000 1,000 9.1% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Rosa Rd, to MacArthur Blvd.) 21,000 26,000 5,000 23.8% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (MacArthur Blvd. to San Miguel Rd.) 19,000 22,000 3,000 15.9% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (San Miguel Rd. to Marguerite Ave.) 18,000 24,000 6,000 33.3% San Joaquin Bills Rd. (Marguerite Ave. to Spyglass Hill Rd.) 12,000 18,000 6,000 50.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Spyglass Hill Rd. to Newport Coast Dr.) 12,000 18,000 6,000 50.0% San Miguel Dr. (north of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 7,000 10,000 3,000 42.9% San Miguel Dr. (south of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 7,000 10,000 3,000 42.9% San Miguel Dr. (north of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 12,000 14,000 2,000 16.7% San Miguel Dr. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 12,000 16,000 4,000 33.3% San MiguelDr. (MacArthur Blvd, to Avocado Ave.) 19,000 20,000 1,000 5.3% San Miguel Dr. (west of Avocado Ave.) 10,000 11,000 1,000 10.0% Santa Barbara Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 10,000 11,000 1,000 10.0% Santa Cruz Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 8,000 8,000 0 0.0% Santa Rosa Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 11,000 14,000 3,000 27.3% Santiago Dr. (Tustin Ave, to Irvine Ave.) 5,000 6,000 1,000 20.0% Santiago Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 3,000 4,000 1,000 33.3% Spyglass Hill Rd. (San Miguel Dr. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 4,000 4,000 0 0.0% Superior Ave. (north of Placentia Ave.) 17,000 19,000 2,000 11.8% Superior Ave. (Placentia Ave. to Hospital Rd.) 22,000,, 28,000 6,000 27.3% Su eriorAve, (Hospital Rd. to Coast H 24,000 28,000 4 000 16.7% 4-16 II TABLE 4-7 (PAGE 4 OF 4) TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH EXISTING 77 (200112002) BUILDOUT % COUNT FORECAST ,GROWTH GROWTH ON e. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 3,000 1,000 50.0% 0.0% y Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 3,000 11,000 3,000 I5,000 0 4,000 36.4% y Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) r 8,000 10,000 2,000 25.0% (east of Newport Blvd.) man Ave. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 14,000 18;000 4,000 28.6% man Ave. (Birch St. to MacArthur Blvd.) 12,000 16,000 4,000 33.3% 0.0% f Dr. Irvine Ave. to Dover Dr. 16,000 16,000 0 U:\Uriobs\_01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xis]T4-7 II 1 4-17 1 03 EXHIBIT 4-13 TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT pm VOLUME/CAPACITY (WC) RATIOS 47 106 0.29 0.23 ' 18 � 3 .94 aaR .60 O40 91 I z 0.30 0.20 94 mq n 2.50 10 . � 1 47 r r r r r r r � r NyJ yx wM 79 .29 1.00 s .18 0.41 b 030 3 0 18 1D6 S5 rppt .b 20 1.03 0.86 128 7.24 1 0.35 - 0.5 a 8H 1.00 ° .48 7 0.8 .53 1.1'/S/5 1 f .82 . LEGEND: 0.29 ` Sj� - .. 1.08 0.58 _ 0.88-VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO 0.7 " �0 0.13 PACIFIC 59 r__: OCEAN0 NEWPORT [TEACH GENERAL PLAN UPDATMEWPOrt 8eacb Calif0mia-012321bomin2 vcmxd URBAN CgO3DA19 • Dover Drive north of Westcliff Drive • Dover Drive north of Coast Highway • Jamboree Road north of Bayview Highway • Jamboree Road north of University Drive • Jamboree Road north of San Joaquin Hills Road • MacArthur Boulevard north of Bison Avenue • MacArthur Boulevard north of Ford Road • MacArthur Boulevard north of San Joaquin Hills Road • Newport Coast Drive north of SR-73 Northbound Ramps • Newport Boulevard south of Hospital Road • Jamboree Road south of Birch Street • Irvine Avenue south of University Drive • Hospital Road east of Newport Boulevard • Campus Drive east of MacArthur Boulevard • Bristol Street North east of Birch Street • Bristol Street South east of Birch Street • Coast Highway east of Dover Drive • Coast Highway east of Bayside Drive • Coast Highway east of Jamboree Road • Ford Road east of MacArthur Boulevard • Coast Highway east of MacArthur Boulevard • Coast Highway east of Goldenrod Avenue • Coast Highway east of Marguerite Avenue • Coast Highway east of Poppy Avenue • Coast Highway west of Superior Avenue/Balboa Boulevard • Coast Highway west of Riverside Drive • Bristol Street North west of Campus Drive • Bristol Street South west of Campus Drive • Dover Drive west of Irvine Avenue • Bristol Street South west of Jamboree Road 4.5 Peak Hour Forecasts The final data evaluated for the True Minimum General Plan Buildout scenario was intersection volume and geometric data for the 62 intersections selected for analysis (Bluff Road has been removed from this scenario, as there is no development on Banning Ranch). The same intersection configurations have been used as for the currently adopted General Plan Buildout with constrained network intersection capacity utilization values (ICUs). Table 4-8 summarizes the True Minimum General Plan Buildout ICUs based on the AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes and the intersection geometric data as compared with currently adopted General Plan with constrained network ICUs. Appendix "O" contains the detailed ICU calculation worksheets. The worksheets in Appendix "O" summarize the intersection geometric data and the AM and PM peak intersection turning movement volumes. A comparison of true minimum General Plan Buildout ICUs to existing ICUs is shown on Table 4-9. Table 4-10 summarizes intersection analysis for buildout conditions. Deficient intersections are shown on Exhibit 4-C. Intersections with ICU values greater than 0.90 (LOS "E" or worse) in either peak period are: • Superior Avenue (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM/PM) • Newport Boulevard (NS)/Hospital Road (EW) (PM) • Riverside Drive (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM/PM) • Tustin Avenue (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM/PM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/Campus Drive (EW) (PM) • Von Kerman Avenue (NS)/Campus Drive (EW) (PM) • Jamboree Road (NS)/Campus Drive (EW) (AM/PM) • Campus Drive (NS)/Bristol Street North (EW) (AM/PM) • Birch Street (NS)/Bristol Street North (EW) (AM) • Campus Drive (NS)/Bristol Street South (EW) (AM) • Irvine Avenue (NS)/University Drive (EW) (AM/PM) 11 4-20 11 1 TABLE "(PAGE 1 OF 2) ' TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) PLAN COMPARISON TO CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL ' AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR CURRENTLY CURRENTLY ADOPTED TRUE ADOPTED TRUE ' INTERSECTION NS/EW FORECAST MINIMUM DELTA FORECAST MINIMUM DELTA 1. Bluff Rd. & Coast Hw. 1.27 DNE� N/A ].29 DNE N/A 2. Superior Av. & Placentia Av. 0.64 0.74 0.10 0.68 0.86 0.18 3. Superior Av. & Coast Hw. 1.01 0.98 -0.03 0.99 0.97 0.94 0.96MO* -0.05 4. Newport BI. & Hos iml Rd. 0.79 0.79 0.00 5. Newport BI. & Via Lido 0.54 052 -0.02 0.46 0.41 ' 6. Newport BI. & 32nd St. 0.52 0.46 .0.06 0.71 1.12 0.58 1.108. 7. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. 1.03 1.01 -0.02 Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. 1.02 1.01 .0.01 0.85 0.839. MacArthur BI. & Ca us Dr. 0.76 0.75 -0.01 L25 0.80 0.80 180 0.00 10. MacArthur BI. & Birch St. 0.71 0.70 -0.01 11, Von Karmen Av. & Campus Dr. 0.66 0.64 -0.02 0.93 0.94 0.01 12. MacArthur BI. & Von Karmen Av. 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.00 ' 13. Jamboree Rd. &Campus Dr. 0.92 0.93 0.01 1.24 1.23 -0.01 14. Jamboree Rd. & Birch SL 0.79 0.80 0.01 0.80 0.80 0.00 15. Campus Dr. & Bristol SL 0.96 0.96 0.00 1.08 1.08 0.00 16. Birch SL & Bristol St. 0.92 0.93 0.01 0.72 0.72 0.00 17. Campus DrArvine Av. & Bristol SL S 0.93 0.91 -0 02 0.77 0.76 -0.01 18. Bimh St. & Bristol St. (SI 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.53 0.53 0.00 ' 19, Irvine Av. & Mesa Dr. 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.90 0.90 0.00 20. Irvine Av. & Universi Dr. 1.14 1.15 0.01 1.19 1.16 -0.03 21. Irvine Av. & Sanda o Dr. 0.70 0.69 -0.01 0.78 0.76 -0.02 ' 22. Irvine Av. & Hi and Dr. 0.61 0.61 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.70 0.71 0.01 24. Irvine Av. & Westcliff Dr.. 0.67 0.66 -0.01 0.82 0.80 -0.02 ' 25.Dover Dr. &WestcliffDr. 0.39 040 0.01 0.56 0.57 0.01 26. Dover Dr. & 16th St. 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.64 0.65 0.01 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.86 0.84 -0.02 0.90 0.88 -0.02 ' 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0:83 0.82 .0.01 0.94 0.93 -0.01 29. MacArthur BI. & Jamboree Rd. 0.96 0.97 0.01 0.99 0.99 0.00 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. 0.70 0.71 0.01 0.69 0.68 .0.01 ' 31. Bayview Pl. & Bristol SL Q 0.60 0.59 .0.01 0.63 0.63Mo*-00" 32. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. S 0.96 0.97 0.01 0.85 0.8433. Jamboree Rd. & Ba iew W . 0.48 OAS 0.00 0.70 0.7034. Jamboree Rd. & EastbluffDr. /Universi Dr. 0.64 0.65 0.01 0.69 0.6835. Jamboree Rd. & Bison Av. 0.51 0.50 -0.01 0.5805836. Jamboree Rd. & EastbluffDr./Ford Rd. 0.78 0.76002 072 37. Jamboree Rd. & San Joa uin Hills Rd. 0.61 0.60 ul 0.G5 0 65 0.00 4-21 1 TABLE 4.8 (PAGE 2 OF 2) TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN INTERSECTION NSIEW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR CURRENTLY ADOPTED FORECAST TRUE MINIMUM DELTA CURRENTLY ADOPTED FORECAST TRUE MINIMUM DELTA 38. Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbara Dr, 0.55 0.54 -0.01 0.711 0.71 0.00 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.85 0.85 0.00 0.891 0.87 -0.02 0. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.36 0,34 •0.02 0.34 0.34 0.00 41. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.39 039 0,00 0.71 0.70 -0.01 2. Newport Center Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.63 0.62 -0.01 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.37 0.38 0.01 0.79 0.78 -0.01 5. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.77 0.78 0.01 0.80 0.79 -0.01 6. SR-73 NB Rams & Bison Av. o.47 0.47 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.00 7. SR-13 SB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.38 0.39 0.01 0.29 0.29 0.00 8. MacArthur Bl. & Bison Av. 0.78 0.77 .0.01 0.80 0.80 0,00 9. MacArhmr Bl. & Ford RdJBwdta Canyon Dr. 0.77 0.77 0.00 1.06 1.06 0.00 50. MacArthur B1. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0,77 0.77 0.00 1.04 1.02 402 51. MacArthur Bl. & San Miguel Dr. 0.63 0.62 .0.01 0.77 0.76 .0.01 52. MucArthurBl. & Coast Hw. 0.74 0.74 0.00 0,831 0.80 -0.03 53. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.53 0.52 .0.01 54. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.59 0.57 -0.02 55. San Miguel Dr. & Spyglass Hill Rd. 0.30 0.30 0,00 0.38 0.38 0.00 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd. & San Miguel Dr. 0.52 0.51 .0.01 0.68 0.68 0.00 57. Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw. 1.08 1.06 .0.02 0.70 0.15 -0.04 58. Marguerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.51 0.49 .0.02 59.Mar eriteAv.&CoastHw. 0.90 0.88 -0.02 0.91 0.90 -0.01 60. Spyglass Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.60 0.59 -0.01 0.46 0.45 -0.01 61. Po Av. & Coast Hw. 0.67 0A81 0.01 0.76 0,75 .0.01 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Ramps 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.40 0.39 -0.01 G4.New o' 0"st'r San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.47 0.46 -0.01 G5, Nc ort Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.57 0.57 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.00 tDNE s Does Not Exist U: W cJobsl 012001012321Exoell(01232-18.xIsjT4.8 4-22 ll 1 r TABLE 4-9 (PAGE 1 OF 2) TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO EXISTING INTERSECTION NS/EW AM PEAK HOU 11 PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING COUNT FUTURE FORECAST DELTA EXISTING COUNT FUTURE FORECAST DELTA 2. Superior Av. & Placentia Av. 0.66 0.74 0.08 0.67 0.86 0.19 3. Su erior Av. & Coast Hw. 0.84 0.98 0.141 0.901 0.94 0.04 4. Newport BI. & Hospital Rd. 0.54 0.79 0.25 0.701 0.96 0.26 5. Newport Bl. & Via Lido 0.41 0.52 0.11 0.37 0.41 0.04 6. Newport BI. & 32nd St. 0.73 0.46 -0.27 0.78 0.58 -0.20 7. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. 0.84 1.01 0.17 0.93 1.10 0.17 S. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. 0.80 1.01 0.21 0.67 0.83 0:16 9. MacArthur BI. & Campus Dr. 0.61 0.75 0.14 0.85 1.25 0.40 10. MacArthur BI. & Birch St. 0.49 0.70 0.211 0.66 0.80 0.14 11. Von Karman Av. & Campus Dr. 0.55 0.64 0.09 0.791 0.94 0.15 12. MacArthur BI. & Von Kerman Av. .0.46 0.54 0.08 0.53 0.64 0.11 13. Jamboree Rd. & Campus Dr. 0.70 0.93 0.23 0.85 1.23 0.38 14, Jamboree Rd. & Birch St. 0.61 0.80 0.19 0.60 0.80 0.20 15. Campus Dr. & Bristol St. 0.77 0.96 0.19 0.94 1.08 0.14 16. Birch St. & Bristol St. 0.66 0.93 0.27 0.61 0.72 0.11 17. Campus Dr./Irvine Av. & Bristol St. S 0.721 0.91 0.191 0.58 0.76 0.18 18. Birch St. & Bristol St. S 0.46 0.52 0.061 0.44 0.53 0.09 19. Irvine Av. & Mesa Dr. 0.70 0.68 -0.02 0.94 0.90 -0.04 20. Irvine Av. & University Dr. 0.82 1.15 0.33 0.89 1.16 0.27 21. Irvine Av. & Santiago Dr. 0.66 0.69 0.03 0.72 0:76 0.04 22. Irvine Av. & Highland Dr. 0.57 0.61 0.04 0.601 0.63 0.03 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 0.72 0.78 0.06 0.64 0.71 0.07 24. Irvine Av. & Westcliff Dr. 0.57 0.66 0.09 0.77 0.80 0.03 25. Dover Dr. & Westcliff Dr. 0.38 0.40 0.02 0.48 0.57 0.09 26. Dover Dr. & 16th St. 0.55 0.64 0.09 0.57 0.65 0.08 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.70 0.84 0.14 0.74 0.88 0.14 28. Bayside Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.69 0.82 0.13 0.70 0.93 0.23 29. MacArthur BI. & Jamboree Rd. 0.88 0.97 0.09 0.911 0.99 0.08 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. 0.55 0.71 0.16 0.591 0.68 0.09 31. Bayview PI. & Bristol St. S 0.48 0.59 0.11 0.561 0.63 0.07 32. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. S 0.75 0.97 0.22 0.721 0.84 0.12 33. Jamboree Rd. & Bayview W . 0.41 0.48 0.07 0.571 0.70 0.13 34. Jamboree Rd. & EastbluffDr. [University Dr. 0.60 0.65 0.05 0.64 0.68 0.04 35. Jamboree Rd. & Bison Av. 0.451 0.50 0.05 0.51 0.58 0.07 36. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr./Ford Rd. 0.69 0.76 0.07 0.65 0.73 0.08 37, Jamboree Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.801 0.60 -0.201 1.00 0.65 .0.35 TABLE 4.9 (PAGE 2 OF 2) , TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO EXISTING INTERSECTION (NSIEWI AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING COUNT FUTURE FORECAST DELTA EXISTING COUNT FUTURE FORECAST DELTA 38, Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbara Dr. 0.47 0.54 0.07 0.63 6.71 0.08 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.68 0.85 0.17 0.74 0.87 0.13 40. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.36 0.34 .0.02 0.36 0.34 -0.02 41. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.32 0.39 0.07 0.52 0.70 0.18 42. Ncwport Center Dr. & Coast Hw. OAOI 0.50 0.10 0.52 0.62 0.10 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.33 0.38 0.05 0.72 0.78 0.06 45. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.58 0.78 0.20 0.66 0.79 0.13 46. SR-73 NB Rams & Bison Av. 0.31 0.47 0.16 0.37 0.56 0.19 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.26 0.39 0.13 0.17 0.29 0.12 48.MacArthur BI. & Bison Av. 0.63 0.77 0.14 0.60 0.80 0.20 49. MacArhtur Bl. & Ford RdJBonita Canyon Dr. 0.71 0.77 1 0.06 0.90 1.06 0.16 50. MacArthur B1. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.64 0.77 0.13 0.93 1 1.02 0.09 51. MacArthur BI. & San Miguel Dr. 0,56 0.62 0.06 0.65 0.76 0.11 52. MacArthur BI. & Coast Hw. 0.60 0.74 0.14 0.71 0.80 0.09 53. SR-73 NB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.55 0.69 0.14 0.43 0.52 0.09 54, SR-73 SB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.30 0.45 0.15 0Al 0.57 0.16 55. San Mi ucl Dr. & Spyglass Hill Rd. 0.28 0.30 0.02 0.31 0.38 0.07 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd. & San Miguel Dr. 0.44 0.51 0.07 0.54 0.68 0.14 57. Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw. 0.99 1.06 0.07 0,691 0.75 0.06 58. Marguerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.31 0.38 0.07 0.35 0.49 0.14 59.Mar uctiteAv.&CoastHw. 0.83 0.88 0.05 0.82 0.90 0.08 60. Spyglass Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.44 0.59 0.15 0.30 0.45 0.15 61. Poppy Av. & Coast Hw. 0.61 0,68 0,07 0.65 0.75 0.10 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Rams 0.45 0.54 0.09 0.31 0.39 0.08 G4. Ne ort Coast Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.37 0.63 0.26 0.29 0.46 0.17 G5. Nc ort Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.47 0!571 0.10 0.50 0.60 0.10 U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xis[T4.9 I 1 4-24 1I TABLE 4-10 (PAGE 1 OF 2) 1 TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY 2. Superior Av. & Placentia Av. - 3. Su erior Av. & Coast Hw. 0.98 E 0.94 E 4. Ne ort B1. & Hos ital Rd. 0.79 C 0.96 E 5. Ne ort Bl. & Via Lido 0.52 A 0.41 A 6. Ne ort Bl. & 32nd St. 0.46 A 0.58 A 7. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. 1.01 F 1.10 F 8. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. 1.01 F 0.83 D 9. MacArthur Bl. & Campus Dr. 0.75 C 1.25 F 10. MacArthur Bl. & Birch St. 0.70 B 0.80 C 11. Von Karman Av. & Campus Dr. 0.64 B 0.94 E 12. MacArthur Bl. & Von Kamtan Av. 0.54 A 0.64 B 13. Jamboree Rd. & Campus Dr. 0.93 E 1.23 F 14. Jamboree Rd. &Birch St. 0.90 C 0.80 C 15. Cam us Dr. &Bristol St. 0.96 E 1.08 F 16. Birch St. & Bristol St. 0.93 E 0.72 C 17. C us Dr./Irvine Av. & BristolSt. S 0.91 E 0.76 C 18. Birch St. & Bristol St. S 0.52 A 0.53 A 19. Irvine Av..& Mesa Dr. 0.68 B 0.90 D 20. Irvine Av. & University Dr. 1.15 F 1.16 F 21. Irvine Av. & Santiago Dr. 0.69 B 0.76 C 22. Irvine Av. & Hi bland Dr. 0.61 B 0.63 B 23. Irvine Av. &Dover Dr. 0.78 C 0.71 C 24. Irvine Av. & Westcliff Dr. 0.66 B 0.80 C 25. Dover Dr. & Westcliff Dr. 0.40 A 0.57 A 26. Dover Dr. & 16th St. 0.64 B 0.65 B 27, Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.84 D 0.88 D 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.82 D 0.93 E 29, MacArthur Bl. & Jamboree Rd. 0.97 E 0.99 E 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. 0.71 C 0.68 B 31. Ba 'ew Pl. & Bristol St. S 0.59 A 0.63 B 32. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. S 0.97 E 0.84 D 33. Jamboree Rd. & Bayview W 0.48 A 0.70 B 34. Jamboree Rd. & EastbluffDr. fUniversity Dr. 0.65 B 0.68 B 35. Jamboree Rd. & Bison Av. 0.50 A 0.58 A 36. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr./Ford Rd. 0.76 C 0.73 C 37. Jamboree Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.60 A 0.65 B 4-25 TABLE 4.10 (PAGE 2 OF 2) TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY INTERSECTION NSlEW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 38. Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbara Dr. 0.54 A 0.711 C 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.85 D 0.87 D 40. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.34 A 0.34 A 41. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.39 A 0.70 B 42. Newport Center Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.50 A 0.62 B 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.381 A 0.78 C 45. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.781 C 0.79 C 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.47 A 0.56 A 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.39 A 0.29 A 48. MacArthur Bl, & Bison Av. 0.77 C 0.80 C 49. MacArhtur Bl. & Ford Rd,/Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.77 C 1.06 F 50. MacArthur Bl. & San Joa uin'Hills Rd, 0.77 C 1.02 F 51. MacArthur Bl. & San Miguel Dr. 0.621 B 0.76 C 52. MacArthur Bl. & Coast Hw. 0.74 C 0.80 C 53. SR-73 NB Rams & Bohita Canyon Dr. 0.69 B 0.52 A 54. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.45 A 0.57 A 55. San Mi uel Dr. & Spyglass HilRd. 0,30 A 0.38 A 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd. & San Miguel Dr. 0.51 A 0.68 B 57. Goldenrod Av, & Coast Hw, 1.061 F 0.75 C 58. Mar erite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.38 A 0.49 A 59.Mar erite Av. & Coast Hw. 0.88 D 0.90 D 60. Spyglass Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.59 A 0.45 A 61. Poppy Av. & Coast Hw. 0.68 B 0,75 C 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Rams 0.54 A 0.39 A 64.,Newport Coast Dr. & San Joaquin Hills R& 0.63 B 0.46 A 65. Newport Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.57 A 0.60 A U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xls]T4-10 4-26 x EXHIBIT 4-C TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE WITH OPEN SPACE PACIFIC OCEAN LEGEND: = AM LOS "E" ' = PM LOS "E" • = LOS "E" = AM LOS "F" ,= PM LOS "F" -= LOS "F" PLAN • Bayside Drive (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (PM) ' • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/Jamboree Road (EW) (AM/PM) • Jamboree Road (NS)/Bristol Street South (EW) (AM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/Ford Road/Bonita Canyon Drive (EW) (PM) ' • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/San Joaquin Hills Road (EW) (PM) Goldenrod Avenue (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM) ' The only intersections that do not now experience a deficiency that did experience one before are Bluff Road (NS) at Coast Highway (EW) and Marguerite Avenue (NS) at Coast Highway (EW). Additional locations ' experience changes in levels of service. The change at Marguerite Avenue (NS) at Coast Highway (EW) is caused by land use changes, while Bluff Road (NS) at ' Coast Highway (EW) has been removed from the list because Bluff Road does not exist in this scenario. ' Intersection analysis has been performed to determine improvements necessary to provide acceptable levels of service. ICU worksheets are included in Appendix "P". Table 4-11 compares the ICU results with and without , improvements. Improvements necessary to provide acceptable levels of service are shown in Table 4-12. Improvements have been developed that provide acceptable operations at all ' potentially deficient intersections. The feasibility of the necessary improvements is questionable at some locations (particularly where additional through lanes are necessary). 1 4-28 TABLE 4.11 (PAGE 1 OF 2) TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS/EW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR TRUE MINIMUM WITH IMPROVEMENTS DELTA TRUE MINIMUM WITH IMPROVEMENTS DELTA 2. Superior Av. & Placentia Av. 0.74 0.74 0.001 0.86 0.86 0.00 3. Superior Av. & Coast Hw. 0.98 0.85 -0.13 0.94 0.83 -0.11 4. Newport Bl. & Hospital Rd. 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.96 0.88 -0.08 5. Newport BI. & Via Lido 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 6. Newport BI. & 32nd St. 0.46 0.46 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 7. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. 1.01 0.70 -0.31 1.10 0.85 -0.25 S. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. 1.01 0.70 -0.31 0.831 0.83 0.00 9. MacArdmr BI. & Campus Dr. 0.75 0.73 -0.02 1.251 0.87 -0.38 10. MacArthur Bl. & Birch St. 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.801 0.80 0.00 11. Von Kaman Av. & Campus Dr. 0.64 0.61 -0.03 0.94 0.89 -0.05 12. MacArthur BI. & Von Karman Av. 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.00 13. Jamboree Rd. & Campus Dr. 0.93 0.90 -0.03 '1.23 0.95 -0.28 14. Jamboree Rd. & Birch St. 0.80 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.80 0.00 15. Campus Dr. & Bristol St. 0.96 0.88 -0.08 1.08 0.85 -0.23 16. Birch St. & Bristol St. 0.93 0.78 -0.15 0.72 0.70 -0.02 17. Campus DrdIrvine Av. & Bristol St. S 0.91 0.85 -0.06 0.761 0.76 0.00 18. Birch St. & Bristol St. S 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.53 0.53 0.00 19. Irvine Av. & Mesa Dr. 0.68 0.62 -0.06 0.90 0.85 -0.05 20. Irvine Av. & University Dr. 1.15 0.74 -0.41 1.16 0.83 -0.33 21. Irvine Av. & Santiago Dr. 0.69 0.54 -0.15 0.76 0.57 -0.19 22. Irvine Av. & Highland Dr. 0.61 0.61 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.00 24.Irvine Av. &WestcliffDr. 0.66 0.66 0.00 0.80 0.80 0.00 25. Dover Dr. & Westeliff Dr. 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.57 0.571 0.00 26. Dover Dr. & 16th St. 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.00 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.84 0.84 0.00 0.88 0.88 0.00 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.82 0.81 -0.01 0.93 0.89 -0.04 29. MacArthur BI. & Jamboree Rd. 0.97 0.84 -0.13 0.99 0.89 -0.10 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. 0.71 0.71 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.00 31. Bayview PI. & Bristol St. S 0.59 0.59 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 32. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. S 0.97 0.74 -0.23 0.84 0.80 -0.04 33. Jamboree Rd. & Bayview W . 0.48 0.481 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.00 34. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbtuff Dr. [University Dr. 0.65 0.65 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.00 35. Jamboree Rd. & Bison Av. 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 3G. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr./Ford Rd. 0.76 0.76 0.00 0.73 0.73 0.00 37. Jamboree Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.60 0.60 0.001 0.65 0.65 0.00 4-29 I TABLE 4-11 (PAGE 2 OF 2) TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) SUMMARY , INTERSECTION NSlEW AM PEAK HOUR I PM PEAK HOUR TRUE MINIMUM WITH IMPROVEMENTS DELTA TRUE MINIMUM WITH I IMPROVEMENTS DELTA 38.lamboree Rd. & Santa Barbara Dr. 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.00 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.85 0.85 0.00 0.87 0.87 0.00 0. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 41, Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.00 2. Newport Ccntcr Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.00 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.00 45. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.78 0.781 0.00 0.791 0.79 0.00 6. SR-73 NB Rams & Bison Av. 0.47 0.471 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.00 7. SR-73 SB Rams & Bison Av. 0.39 0.391 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 8. MacArthur BI. & Bison Av. 0.77 0.77 0.00 0.80 0.80 0.00 49. MacArhhur BI. & Ford Rd./Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.77 0.71 -0.06 1.06 0.86 .0.21 50. MacArthur BI. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.77 0.66 .0.11 1.02 0.83 -0.19 51. MacArthur BI. & Son Miguel Dr. 0.62 0.62 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.00 52. MacArthur BI. & Coast Hw. 0.74 0.74 0.00 0.80 0.80 0.00 53. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 54. SR-73 SB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.451 0.45 0.00 0.57 0.57 0.00 55. San Miguel Dr. &Spyglass Hill Rd. 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.00 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd: & Son Miguel Dr. 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.00 57. Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw. 1.06 0.77 -0.29 0.75 0.75 0.00 58. Marguerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.491 0.49 0.00 59.Mar uerite Av. & Coast Hw. 0.88 0.88 0.00 0.90 0.90 0.00 60. Snyglass Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.59 0.59 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.00 61. Poppy Av. & Coast Hw. 0.68 0.68 0,00 0.75 0.75 0.00 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Rams 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.39 0.39 0.00 64. N ort Coast Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.00 65. Nm ort Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.57 0.57 0.00 0.60 0.60 0,00 U;1Uejobs\ 012001012321Excell[01232-10,xIs)T4-11 4-30 TABLE 4-12 (PAGE 1 OF 2) TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE WITH OPEN SPACE NETWORK ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT Superior Av. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Construct 1st NB right turn lane. Construct 4th EB through lane. Construct 5th WB through lane. New ort BI. (NS at Hospital Rd. (EW) Construct 2nd NB left turn lane. Riverside Av. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Construct SB free right turn lane. Construct 3rd EB through lane. Construct 4th WB through lane. Tustin Av. (NS at Coast Hw. (EW) Construct 3rd EB through lane. MacArthur BI. NS at Campus Dr. (EW) Construct SB free ri ht turn lane. Von Karmen Av. (NS) at Campus Dr. EW Construct 1 st WB ri ht turn lane. Jamboree Rd. (NS) at Campus Dr. (EW) Construct NB free right turn lane. Construct 4th SB through lane. Construct 1 st SB right turn lane. Construct 3rd EB left turn lane. Campus Dr. (NS) at Bristol St. N (EW) Construct SB shared through right lane. Construct 5th WB through lane. Construct 1st WB right turn lane. Birch St. (NS) at Bristol St. N (EW) Construct 3rd NB through lane. Construct 1st WB right turn lane. Campus Dr.11rvina Av. NS) at Bristol St. S (EW) Construct 1st NB right turn lane. Irvine Av. (NS) at University Dr. (EW) Construct 3rd NB through lane. Construct 3rd SB through lane. Restripe 2nd EB through lane to shared through left lane. Chan a EIW hasing to Split. Bayside Dr. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Restripe SB through lane to shared through left lane. Convert SB defacto to 1 st SB right turn lane. Install SB right turn overlap phasing. MacArthur BI. (NS) at Jamboree Rd. (EW) Construct 4th NB through lane. Construct 3rd WB left turn lane. Jamboree Rd. (NS) at Bristol St. S (EW) Construct 2nd EB left turn lane. TABLE 4-12 (PAGE 2 OF 2) TRUE MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE WITH OPEN SPACE -NETWORK ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT MacArthur BI. (NS) at Ford Rd./Bonita Canyon Dr. (EW) Construct 3rd SB left turn lane. Eliminate SB free right turn lane. Construct 3rd EB through lane. MacArthur BI. (NS) at San Joaquin Hills Rd. (EW) Construct 4th NB through lane. Construct 3rd EB left turn lane. Goldenrod Av. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Construct 3rd WB through lane. Elminiate WB defacto ri ht turn lane. UAUcJobsN 01200\01232NExceiXIO1232-18.xlsIT4-12 5 0 SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (POST-2025) ALTERNATIVE WITH OPEN SPACE NETWORK SCENARIO This chapter presents subarea minimum (as defined in the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) alternatives) General Plan Buildout (Post-2025) with open space network conditions. General Plan Buildout model inputs are discussed and refined forecast volumes are presented. Data are compared to existing conditions to show reasonable growth and to currently adopted General Plan conditions (as defined in Chapter 3 of this report) results to show differences. 5.1 Land Use and Socioeconomic Data (SED) This section discusses the land use and socioeconomic data inputs. 5.1.1 Subarea Minimum General Plan Buildout Land Use Data The Subarea Minimum General Plan Buildout land use data was provided to Urban Crossroads, Inc. staff by City staff and the City's General Plan consultant, EIP Associates. Appendix "Q" of this report documents the explicit land use data included in NBTM 3.1 for subarea minimum General Plan Buiidout conditions in this analysis. Table 5-1 summarizes the overall subarea minimum General Plan Buildout land uses for the City of Newport Beach. Appendix "R" contains the land use changes by TAZ compared to the currently adopted General Plan scenario. An overall comparison to currently adopted General Plan land use is also shown in Table 5-1. Land uses have changed based on data provided by the City. The largest reductions in land use compared to currently adopted General Plan conditions occur in Banning Ranch and Cannery Village. For subareas in which the currently adopted General Plan is the least intense, the land use of the subarea minimum alternative of GPAC is used, instead of the currently adopted General Plan. Table 5-2 shows subarea minimum General Plan Buildout land use growth from existing. Medium density residential and apartments each grow by 5-1 ;1 TABLE 5-1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT ' LAND USE COMPARISON NBTM CODE' DESCRIPTION UNITS ADOPTED QUANTITY SUBAREA MINIMUM QUANTITY CHANGE %CHANGE 1 Low Density Residential DU 18,347 17,833 514 -2.80% 2 Medium Density Residential DU 12,859 12,903 44 0.34% 3 A artment DU 13,374 15,281 1,907 14.26% 4 Elderly Residential DU 200 200 0.00% 5 Mobile Home DU 455 455 0.00% TOTAL DWELLING'UNITS DU 45,23 46,872 1,437 3.13% 6 Motel ROOM 139 194 55 39.57% 7 Hotel ROOM 3,387 4,069 682 20.14% 9 Re tonal Commercial TSF 1,633.840 1,464.000 169.840 -10.40% 10 General Commercial TSF 4.627.760 4,547.128 80.632 -1.74% 11 Commercial/Recreation ACRE 5.100 5.100 0.00% 13 Resthurant TSF 198.780 198.780 0.00% 15 Fast Food Restaurant TSF 13.940 13.940 0.00% 16 1 Auto Dealer/Sales TSF 227.170 227.170 0.00% 17 Yacht Club TSF 70.310 70.310 0.00% 18 Health Club TSF 61.330 61.330 0.00% 19 Tennis Club CRT 59 59 0.00% 20 Marina SLIP 11055 1,055 0.00% 21 Theater SEAT 5,475 5,475 - 0.00% 22 Newport Dunes ACRE 64.00 64.00 0.00% 23 General Office TSF 12,305.620 12,614.019 308.399 2.51% 24 Medical/GovemmentOffice TSF 910.616 837.696 72.920 -8.01% 25 Research & Development TSF 81.730 81.730 0.00% 26 Industrial TSF 1,956.092 1,153.867 802.225 -41.01% 27 Mini-Storage/Warehouse TSF 196.420 196,420 0.00% 28 Pre-school/Day Care TSF 56.770 56.770 0.00% 29 Elementary/Private School STU 4,455 4.455 0.00% 30 Junior/High School STU 4,765 4,765 0.00% 31 Cultural/Learning Center TSF 40.000 40.000 0.00% 32 Library TSF 78.840 78.840 1 0.00% 33 Post Office TSF 73.760 63.800 9.900 -13.43% 34 Hospital BED 1,265 1,265 0.00% 35 Nursin /ConO. Home BEDS 661 602 59 -8,93% 36 Church TSF 467.210 441.200 26.010 -5.57% 37 Youth Ctr./Service TSF 166.310 166.310 0.00% 38 Park ACRE 94.920 112.250 17.330 18.26% 39 Regional Park ACRE 45.910. 45.910 0.00% 40 Golf Course ACRE 298.222J 298.290 1 0.00% 'Uses 8,12, and'14 are part of the old NBTAM model structure and are not currently utilized in the City land use datesets. , 2 Units Abbreviations; DU = Dwelling Units TSF = Thousand Square Feet CRT = Court STU = Students U9UcJobs\ 012001012321Exce0(01232-18.xis]TS1 TABLE 5.2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE GROWTH FROM EXISTING NBTM 2002 MINIMUM CODE' DESCRIPTION UNIT SZ QUANTITY QUANTITY GROWTH %GROWTH 1 Low Densibj Residential DU 17,124 17,833 709 3,368 4.14% 35.32% 2 Medium Density Residential DU 9,535 12,903 15,261 6,082 66.12% 3 A artment DU 9,199 200 200 0.00% 4 Elderi Residential DU DU 600 455 145 24.32% 5 Mobile Home TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DU 36,658 46,672 10,014 27.32% 6 Motel ROOM 134 194 60 44.78 0 7 Hotel ROOM 2,821 4,069 1,248 44.24% 9 Re lonaI Commercial TSF 1,259.000 1,464.000 205.000 16.28% 10 General Commercial TSF 3,696.781 4,547.128 850.347 23.00% 11 Commercial/Recreation ACRE 5.100 99.370 5.100 198.780 99.410 0.04% 10D.04% 13 15 Restaurant Fast Food Restaurant TSF TSF 13.940 13.940 0.00% 16 Auto Dealer/Sales TSF 172.420 227.170 54.750 31.75% 17 Yacht Club TSF 51.830 70.310 18.480 35.66°/u 18 Health Club TSF 16.770 61.330 45 265.71% 19 Tennis Club CRT 60 59 1 -1.67% 0.00% 20 Marina SLIP SEAT 1,055 5,489 1,055 5,475 - 14 0.26% 21 22 Theater New ort Dunes ACRE 64.00 64.00 0.00% 23 General Office TSF 10,865.733 .12,614.019 1,748.286 16.09% 24 Medical/Government Office TSF 795.926 837.695 41.770 5.25% 0.00% 25 Research & Development TSF 81.730 1,291.079 81.730 1,153.867 137.212 10.63% 26 27 Industrial Mini-Storage/Warehouse TSF TSF 196.420 196.420 0.00% 28 Pre-school/Da are TSF 55.820 56.770 0.950 56 1.70% 1.28% 29 Elementary/Private School STU 4,399 4,455 0.00% 30 Junior/High School STU 4,765 35.000 4,765 40.000 5.000 14.29% 31 Cultural/Leamin Center TSF TSF 78.840 78.840 0.00% 32 33 Library Post Office TSF 53.700 63.800 10.100 18.81% 34 Hos ital BED 351 1,265 914 260AUA 35 Nursin IConv. Home BEDS 661 377.760 602 441.200 59 63A40 8.93% 16.79% 36 37 Church Youth Ctr./Service TSF TSF 149.560 166.310 16.750 11.20% 38 Park ACRE 113.970 112.250 1.720 -1.51% 39 Re Tonal Park ACRE 305.330 45.910 298.290 45.910 7.04 NIA -2.31°/u 40 1 GoifCourse ACRE ' 1 Uses 8, 12, and 14 are part of the old NBTAM model structure and are not currently utilized in the City land use datasets. 2 Units Abbreviations: DU = Dwelling Units TSF = Thousand Square Feet ' CRT Court STU = Students U:\UcJobs\ 012001012321Exce11[01232-18.xis]TS-2 1 5-3 5.2 more than 3,000 dwelling units. Categories that grow by more than 500,000 square feet include general commercial and general office. 5.1.2 General Plan Buildout Socioeconomic Data (SED) General Plan Buildout SED that has been converted from land use is summarized in Table 5-3. Table 5-3 also contains a comparison of subarea minimum General Plan Buildout SED to existing SED for the City of Newport Beach. The total number of dwelling units are projected to grow by 9,357 units (27 %) from existing conditions. For total employment, an increase of 14,587 employees (22%) is anticipated. Socioeconomic data for the remainder of the primary modeling area (and for Newport Coast, where land use data was unavailable) has been unchanged from the currently adopted General Plan data. Tric Generation Table 5-4 summarizes the overall trip generation for General Plan Buildout conditions for the City of Newport Beach and compares it to existing conditions trip generation. Appendix "S" contains a report of trip generation by NBTM TAZ for the City of Newport Beach. Most of these trips have been calculated from the final General Plan Buildout SED presented previously. Supplemental trips are unchanged from the previously published data. The overall trip generation for the City of Newport Beach is an estimated 880,085 daily vehicle trips. Table 5-5 compares subarea minimum General Plan buildout trip generation to currently adopted General Plan buildout trip generation. Total trip generation increases by approximately 326 daily trips (0.04%). Appendix "T" shows the zone by zone trip generation comparison. Eft TABLE 5-3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH' SUBAREA MINIMUM LAND USE BASED SOCIOECONOMIC DATA SUMMARY/COMPARISON VARIABLE 2002 QUANTITY SMAKLA MQUANTrrY GROWTH L%. ROWTH Occu ied Single Family Dwelling Units 15,970 16,702 732 5% Occupied Multi -Family Dwelling Units 18,294 26,919 8;625 47% TOTAL OCCUPIED DWELLING UNITS 34,264 43,621 9,357 27% Group Quarters Po ulation 661 60271T8,060 -9% Population 75,211 93,27124% Em toed Residents 44,635 56,169 26% Retail Employees 10,970 13,398 2,428 22% Service Employees 17,295 21,750 4,455 P6% Other Employees 36,990 44,694 7,704 21 % TOTAL EMPLOYEES 65,255 79,842 14,587 22% Elem/Hi h School Students 9,164 9,220 56 1% ' Includes data converted from land use only. Excludes Newport Coast and recent annexation areas. U:\Uciobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xisIT53 5-5 TABLE 5-4 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MINIMUM TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY TRIP PURPOSE DAILY TRIP ENDS GROWTH PERCENT GROWTH EXISTING SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT Home Based Work Productions 57,819 75,795 17,976 31.09% Home Based Work Attractions 81,964 101,982 20,018 24.42% Home Based School Productions 11,336 14,779 3,443 30.37% Home Based School Attractions 8,730 8,845 115 1.32% Home Based Other ProdUCt!Dns2 127,338 176,256 47,918 37.63% Home Based Other Attractions 109,815 137,098 27,283 24.84% Work Based Other Productions 52,152 65,124 12,972 24.87% Work Based Other Attractions 57,0351 71,209 14,174 24.85% Other - Other Productions 91,2181 115,843 24,625 27.00% Other - Other Attractions 89,7341 114,154 24,420 27.21 % TOTAL PRODUCTIONS 339,8631 446,7971 106,9341 31A6% TOTAL ATTRACTIONS 347,278 433,288 86,010 24.77% OVERALL TOTAL 1 687,1411 880,0851 192,9441 28,08"/° Home -Work includes Home -Work and Home -University trips, consistent with OCTAM mode choice output. 2 Home -Other includes Home -Shop and Home -Other trips, consistent with OCTAM mode choice output. U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18,xls]T5-4 TABLE 5-5 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MINIMUM TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON DAILY TRIP ENDS SUBAREA CURRENTLY MINIMUM ADOPTED GENERAL GENERAL PLAN PERCENT TRIP PURPOSE PLAN BUILDOUT BUILDOUT GROWTH GROWTH Home Based Work Productions 73,968 75,795 1,827 2.47% -0.24% Home Based Work Attractions 102,230 101,982 -248 304 2.10% Home Based School Productions 14,475 14,779 0 0.00% Home Based School Attractions 8,845 8,845 Home Based Other ProductionsZ 174,257 175,256 999 0.57% Home Based Other Attractions 138,334 137,098 65,124 -1,236 358 -0.89% 0.55% Work Based Other Productions 65,482 71,335 71,209 -126 -0.18% Work Based OtherAttractions 116,275 115,843 -432 -0.37% Other - Other Productions 114,558 1141154 -404 0.35% Other -Other Attractions 444,457 446,797 2,340 0.537 TOTAL PRODUCTIONS 435,302 433,288 2,014 0.46% TOTAL ATTRACTIONS 879,759 880,085 326 0.04% OVERALL TOTAL 1 Home -Work includes Home -Work and Home -University trips, consistent with OCTAM mode choice oul 2 Home -Other includes Home -Shop and Home -Other trips, consistent with OCTAM mode choice output. U.\UcJobs\ 01200\012321Exce1\[01232-18.x1s]T5-5 5-7 5.3 5.4 Traffic Assignment The roadway system for the Subarea Minimum General Plan is almost identical to the constrained roadway system presented in Chapter 3 of this report. The only change is the removal of the roadway system in Banning Ranch, consistent with the land use removal. Exhibit 5-A summarizes the NBTM 3.1 refined Subarea Minimum General Plan Buildout with open space network daily traffic volumes throughout the City of Newport Beach. Changes from the currently adopted General Plan Baseline forecasts are shown on Table 5-6. Only Coast Highway experiences a change in excess of 2,000 vehicles per day (VPD). Table 5-7 compares these refined forecasts to existing counted volumes (presented in the General Plan Baseline document). The highest daily traffic volume increases occur on Coast Highway (an increase of up to1'6,000 VPD). Daily Capacity Analysis Daily roadway segment capacity analysis has been performed at study area roadways, and is shown on Exhibit 5-B. The following roadway segments are expected to operate with daily V/C greater than 0.90: • Newport Boulevard north of Hospital Road • Newport Boulevard north of Via Lido • Jamboree Road north of Campus Drive • Jamboree Road north of Birch Street • Irvine Avenue north of University Drive • Irvine Avenue north of Santiago Drive • Irvine Avenue north of Highland Drive • Irvine Avenue north of Dover Drive EXHIBIT 5-A SUBAREA MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) 29 Y 3, 5/ \ _ I ��\- \,a 1 / t8 16 7 41 ' 10 14 e9' ' 4 X 14 g . q \L172 3 3__ _ 181 IA 10 7 7 waw 3 � 122 32 ivm m. � 26 17 u 29 19 28 20 1ti 14 6 M. 5 a - Yyr 1 20 42 1 38 \ 18 0 8 11 ` 8 50 4 V 5 �u wcAwnx 43 46 2 55 3 64 15 461 2 35 LEGEND: 10 m VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S) 20 a1a ' � � � PACIFIC 55 3 OCEA ,x N i URBAN NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE,Newport Beach Califomia - 01232:SAmin2.mxd 11 TABLE 5-6 (PAGE 1 OF 4) SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON LOCATION ADOPTED I (CONSTRAINED) SUBAREA MINIMUM FORECAST I CHANGE % I CHANGE 16th St. (Irvine Ave. to Dover Dr.) 6,000 6,000 0 0.0% 32nd St. (west of Newport Blvd.) 9,000 8,000 -1,000 -11.1% 32nd St. (east of Newport Blvd.) 5,000 3,000 -2,000 40.0% Avocado Ave. (north of San Miguel Dr.) 5,000 6,000 1,000 20.0% Avocado Ave. (south of San Miguel Dr.) 12,000 12,000 0 0.0% Avocado Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 10,000 11,000 1,000 10.0% Balboa Blvd. (south of Coast Hwy.) 22,000 20,000 -2,000 -9.1% Bayside Dr. (south of Coast Hwy.) 12,000 12,000 0 0.0% Birch St. (Jamboree Rd. to Von Karman Ave.) 18,000 19,000 1,000 5.6% Birch St. (Von Karman Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 20,000 21,000 1,000 5.0% Birch St. (west of MacArthur Blvd.) 20,000 23,000 3,000 15.0% Birch St. (north of Bristol St. North) 27,000 29,000 2,000 7.4% Birch St. (Bristol St North to Bristol St. South) 20,000 22,000 2,000 10.0% Birch St. (south of Bristol St. South) 16,000 16,000 0 0.0% Bison Ave. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 17,000 18,000 1,000 5.9% Bison Ave. (MacArthur Blvd. to SR 73 Fwy.) 11,000 11,000 0 0.0% Bluff Rd. (Coast Hwy. to ISth St.) 13,000 0 -13,000 -100.0% Bluff Rd. (ISth St. to 17th St) 13,000 0 -13,000 -100.0% Bluff Rd. (17th St. to 19th St.) 12,000 0 -12,000 -100.0% Bonita Canyon Dr. (east of MacArthur Blvd.) 34,000 34,000 0 0.0% Bonita Canyon Dr. (west of SR-73 Fwy.) 27;000 27,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. North (west of Campus Dr.) 32,000 33,000 1,000 3.1% Bristol St North (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 28,000 29,000 1,000 3.6% Bristol St. North (east ofBireh St.) 27,000 28,000 1,000 3.7% Bristol St. North (west of Jamboree Rd.) 18,000 18,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. South (west of Campus DrArvine Ave.) 32,000 32,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. South (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 23,000 23,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. South (east of Birch St.) 22,000 22,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. South (west of Jamboree Rd.) 37,000 37,000 0 0.0% Campus Dr. (Jamboree Rd. to Von Karman Ave.) 22,000 22,000 0 0.0% Campus Dr. (Von Kalman Ave, to MacArthur Blvd.) 31,000 31,000 0 010% Campus Dr. (west of MacArthur Blvd.) 39,000 40,000 1,000 2.6% Campus Dr. (north of Bristol St. North) 39,000 39,000 0 0.0% Campus Dr. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 40,000 40,000 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. (west of Bluff Rd.) 60,000 56,000 4,000 -6.7% Coast Hwy. (Bluff Rd. to Superior Ave./Balboa Blvd.) 61,000 56,000 -5,000 -8.2% Coast Hwy. (Superior Ave, to Newport Blvd.) 41,000 40,000 -1,000 -2.4% Coast Hwy. (Newport Blvd. to Riverside Ave.) 68,000 69,000 1,000 1.5% CoastHwy. (Riverside Ave. to Tustin Ave.) 59,000 59,000 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. Tustin Ave. to Dover Dr. 55,000 55,000 0 0.0% I 11 5-10 11 TABLE 5-6 (PAGE 2 OF 4) SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON LOCATION ADOPTED (CONSTRAINED) 78,000 64,000 SUBAREA MINIMUM FORECAST 78,000 64,000 CHANGE 0 0 % CHANGE 0.0% 0.0% Coast Hwy. (Dover Dr. to Bayside Dr.) Coast Hwy. (Bayside Dr. to Jamboree Rd.) Coast Hwy. (Jamboree Rd. to Newport Center Dr.) 51,000 50,000 -1,000 -2.0% 0.0% Coast Hwy. (Newport Center Dr. to Avocado Ave.) 43,000 45,000 43,000 45,000 0 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. (Avocado Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 48,000 46,000 -2,000 -4.2%,000 Coast Hwy. (MacArthur Blvd. to Goldenrod Ave.) 4466,000 46,000 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. (Goldenrod Ave. to Marguerite Ave.) 42,000 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. (Marguerite Ave. to Poppy Ave.) Coast Hwy. (Poppy Ave. to Newport Coast Dr.) 35,000 44,000 35,000 44,000 0 0 0.00/C 0.0% Coast Hwy (east of Newport Coast Dr.) 11,000 0 0.0% Dover Dr. (Irvine Ave. to WestcliffDr.) 11,000 24,000 0 0.0% Dover Dr. (WestcliffDr. to 16thSt.) 24,000 28,000 0 0.0% Dover Dr. (16th St. to Cliff Dr.) 28,000 34,000 1,000 3.0% Dover Dr. (Cliff Dr. to Coast Hwy.) 33,000 10,000 0 0.0% Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at University Dr.) 10,000 15,000 0 0.0% Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at Ford Rd.) 15,000 13,000 0 0.0% Ford Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 13,000 4,000 2,000 -2,000 -50.0% Goldenrod Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 0 0.0% Highland Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 2,000 19,000 1,000 5.6% Hospital Rd. (Placentia Ave. to Newport Blvd.) 18,000 10,000 11,000 1,000 10.0% Hospital Rd. (east of Newport Blvd.) 38,000 38,000 0 0.0% Irvine Ave. (Bristol St. South to Mesa Dr.) 41,000 0 0.0% Irvine Ave. (Mesa Dr. to University Dr.) 41,000 40,000 0 0.0% Irvine Ave. (University Dr. to Santa Isabel Ave.) 40,000 33,000 0 0.0% Irvine Ave. (Santa Isabel Ave. to Santiago Dr.) 33,000 . 32,000 0 0.0% Irvine Ave. (Santiago Dr. to Highland Dr.) 32,000 32,000 0 0.0% Irvine Ave. (Highland Dr. to Dover Dr.) 32,000 29,000 1,000 3.6% Irvine Ave. (Dover Dr. to Westcliff Dr.) 28,000 14,000 1,000 7.70 Irvine Ave. (Westcliff Dr. to 16th St.) 13,000 48,000 1,000 2.1% Jamboree Rd. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 47,000 54,000 0 0.0% Jamboree Rd. (Birch St. to MacArthur Blvd.) 54,000 44,000 1,000 2.3% Jamboree Rd. (MacArthur Blvd. to Bristol St. North) 43,000 53,000 2,000 3.9% Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 51,000 57,000 1,000 1.8% Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St. South to Bayview WY-) 56,000 56,000 57,000 1,000 1.8% Jamboree Rd. (Bayview Wy. to University Dr.) 41,000 0 0.00 Jamboree Rd. (University Dr. to Bison Ave.) 41,000 46,000 1,000 2.2% Jamboree Rd. (Bison Ave. to Ford Rd.) 45,000 56,000 1,000 1.8% Jamboree Rd. (Ford Rd. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 55;000 45,000 2,000 4.7% Jamboree Rd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to Santa Barbara Dr.) 43,000 43,000 1,000 2.4%15,000 Jamboree Rd. (Santa Barbara Dr. to Coast Hwy.) 42,000 15,000 0 0.0% Jamboree Rd. ( Coast Hwy. to Bayside Dr.) 35,000 2,000 6.1% MacArthur Blvd. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 33,000 27,000 1,000 3.8% MacArthur Blvd. (Birch St. to Von Katman Ave.) 26, 00032,000 33,000 1,000 3.1% MacArthur Blvd. Von Karman Ave. to Jamboree Rd. TABLE 5-6 (PAGE 3 OF 4) SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON LOCATION ADOPTED I (CONSTRAINED) SUBAREA MINIMUM' FORECAST CHANGE CHANGE MacArthur Blvd. (south of Jamboree Rd.) 35,000 36,000 1,000 2.9% MacArthur Blvd. (north of Bison Ave.) 74,000 75,000 1,000 1.4% MacArthur Blvd. (Bison Ave, to Ford Rd.) 74,000 74,000 0 0.00/0 MacArthur Blvd. (Ford Rd. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 60,000 61,000 1,000 1.70/a MacArthur Blvd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to SanMiguel Rd.) 39,000 38,000 -1,000 -2.60/a MacArthur Blvd. (San Miguel Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 38,000 38,000 0 0.0% Marguerite Ave. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 8,000 7,000 -1,000 -12.5% Marguerite Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 7,000 6,000 -1,000 -14.3% Mesa Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 13,000 13,000 0 0.0% Newport Blvd. (north of Hospital Rd.) 46,000 47,000 1,000 2.2% Newport Blvd. (Hospital Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 54;000 54,000 0 0.0% Newport Blvd. (Coast Hwy. to Via Lido) 57,000 56,000 -1,000 -1.80/0 Newport Blvd. (Via Lido to 32nd St.) 41,000 41,000 0 0.0% Newport Blvd. (south of 32nd St.) 33,000 34,000 1,000 3.0% Newport Center Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 17,000 16,000 -1,000 -5.9% Newport Coast Dr, (SR-73 Fwy. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 29,000 29,000 0 0.0% Newport Coast Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 24,000 24,000 0 0.0% Newport CoastDr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 19,000 19,000 0 0.0% Placentia Ave. (north of Superior Ave.) 16,000 17,000 1,000 6.3% Placentia Ave. (Superior Ave, to Hospital Rd.) 11,000 12,000 1,000 9.1% Poppy Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 2,000 0 0.0% Riverside Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 10,000 11,000 1,000 10.00/0 San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to Santa Cruz Rd.) 17,000 17,000 0 0.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Cruz Rd. to Santa Rosa Rd.) 12,000 13,000 1,000 8.3% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Rosa Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 26,000 28,000 2,000 7.7% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (MacArthur Blvd. to San Miguel Rd.) 22,000 23,000 1,000 4.5% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (San Miguel Rd. to Marguerite Ave.) 24,000 24,000 0 0.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Marguerite Ave. to Spyglass Hill Rd.) 19,000 19,000 0 0.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Spyglass Hill Rd. to Newport Coast Dr.) 19,000 19,000 0 0.0% San Miguel Dr. (north of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% San Miguel Dr. (south of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% San Miguel Dr. (north of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 14,000 14,000 0 0.0% San Miguel Dr. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 16,000 16;000 0 0.0% San Miguel Dr. (MacArthur Blvd. to Avocado Ave.) 20,000 20,000 0 0.0% San Miguel Dr. (west of Avocado Ave.) 11,000 11,000 0 0.0% Santa Barbara Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 11,000 13,000 2,000 18.20% Santa Cruz Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 9,000 9,OQ0 0 0.0% Santa Rosa Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 14,000 14,000 0 0.0% Santiago Dr. (Tustin Ave, to Irvine Ave.) 6,000 6,000 0 0.0% Santiago Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 4,000 4,000 0 0.0% Spyglass Hill Rd. (San Miguel Dr. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) • 4,000 4,000 0 0.0% Superior Ave. (north of Placentia Ave.) 19,000 19,000 0 0.0% Superior Ave. (Placentia Ave. to Hospital Rd.) 28,000 28,000 0 0.0% Superior Ave. (Hospital Rd. to Coast H 28,000 28,000 0 0.0% 5-12 TABLE 5-6 (PAGE 4 OF 4) SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON SUBAREA ADOPTED MINIMUM % LOCATION (CONSTRAINED) FORECAST CHANGE CHANGE Tustin Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 3,000 3,000 0 0.0% University Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 3,000 3,000 0 0.0% University Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 15,000 15,000 0 0.0% Via Lido (east of Newport Blvd.) 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% Von Karman Ave. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 18,000 19,000 1,000 5.6% Von Karman Ave. (Birch St. to MacArthur Blvd.) 16,000 17,000 1,000 6.3% Westcliff Dr. Irvine Ave. to Dover Dr. 16,000 16,000 0 0.0% U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\(01232-16.XlsjT5-6 5-13 1� TABLE 5.7 (PAGE 1 OF 4) ' SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH LOCATION EXISTING (200112002) COUNT SUBAREA MINIMUM FORECAST GROWTH % GROWTH 16th St. (Irvine Ave, to Dover Dr.) 5,000 6,000 1,000 20.0% 32nd St. (west of Newport Blvd.) 8,000 8,000 0 0.0% 32nd St. (east of Newport Blvd.) 3,000 3,000 0 0.0% Avocado Ave. (north of San Miguel Dr.) 5,000 6,000 1,000 20.0% Avocado Ave. (south of San Miguel Dr.) 12,000 12,000 0 0.0% Avocado Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 11,000 11,000 0 0.0% Balboa Blvd. (south of Coast Hwy.) 18,000 20,000 2,000 11.1% Bayside Dr. (south of Coast Hwy.) 10,000 12,000 2,000, 20.0% Birch St. (Jamboree Rd. to Von Karman Ave.) 12,000 19,000 7,000 58.3% Birch St. (Von Karman Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 15,000 21,000 6,000 40.0% Birch St. (west of MacArthur Blvd.) 16,000 23,000 7,000 43.8% Birch St. (north of Bristol St. North) 23,000 29,000 6,000 26.1% Birch St. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 19,000 22,000 3,000 15.8% Birch St. (south of Bristol St. South) 15,000 16,000 1,000 6.7% Bison Ave. (Jamboree Rd, to MacArthur Blvd.) 13,000 18,000 5,000 38.5% Bison Ave. (MacArthur Blvd. to SR-73 Fwy.) 7,000 11,000 4,000 57.1% Bonita Canyon Dr. (east of MacArthur Blvd.) 26,000 34,000 8,000 30.8% Bonita Canyon Dr. (west of SR-73 Fwy.) 17,000 27,000 10,000 58.8% Bristol St. North (west of Campus Dr.) 28,000 33,000 5,000 17.9% Bristol St. North (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 23,000 29,000 6,000 26.1% Bristol St. North (east of Birch St.) 22,000 28,000 6,000 27.3% Bristol St. North (west of Jamboree Rd.) 16,000 18,000 2,000 12.5% Bristol St. South (west of Campus DrArvine Ave.) 28,000 32,000 4,000 14.3% Bristol St. South (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 17,000 23,000 6,000 35.3% Bristol St. South (east of Birch St.) 16,000 22,000 6,000 37.5% Bristol St. South (west of Jamboree Rd.) 31,000 37,000 6,000 19.4% Campus Dr. (Jamboree Rd, to Von Karman Ave.) 16,000 22,000 6,000 37.5% Campus Dr. (Von Karman Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 20,000 31,000 11,000 55.0% Campus Dr. (west of MacArthur Blvd.) 26,000 40,000 14,000 53.8% Campus Dr. (north of Bristol St. North) 28,000 39,000 11,000 39.3% Campus Dr. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 30,000 40,000 10,000 33.3% Coast Hwy. (west of Superior AveJBalboa Blvd.) 46,000 56,000 10,000 21.7% Coast Hwy. (Superior Ave. to Newport Blvd.) 28,000 40,000 12,000 42.9% Coast Hwy. (Newport Blvd. to Riverside Ave.) 53,000 69,000 16,000 30.2% Coast Hwy. (Riverside Ave. to Tustin Ave.) 45,000 59,000 14,000 31.1% Coast Hwy. (Tustin Ave. to Dover Dr.) 42,000 55,000 13,000 31.0% Coast Hwy. (Dover Dr. to Bayside Dr.) 63,000 78,000 15,000 23.8% Coast Hwy. (Bayside Dr. to Jamboree Rd.) 51,000 64,000 13,000 25.5% Coast Hwy. (Jamboree Rd. to Newport CenterDr.) 42,000 50,000 8,000 19.0°/u Coast Hwy. (Newport Center Dr. to Avocado Ave.) 35,000 43,000 8,000 22.9% Coast Hi Avocado Ave. to MacArthur Blvd. 36,000 45,000 9,000 1 25.0% 5-14 TABLE 5-7 (PAGE 2 OF 4) ' SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH LOCATION EXISTING (2001/2002) COUNT SUBAREA MINIMUM FORECAST GROWTH % GROWTH Coast Hwy. (MacArthur Blvd. to Goldenrod Ave.) 40,000 46,000 6,000 15.0% Coast Hwy. (Goldenrod Ave. to Marguerite Ave.) 39,000 46,000 7,000 17.9% Coast Hwy. (Marguerite Ave. to Poppy Ave.) 35,000 42,000 7,000 20.0% Coast Hwy. (Poppy Ave. to Newport Coast Dr.) 28,000 .35,000 7,000 25.0% Coast Hwy (east of Newport Coast Dr.) 35,000 44,000 9,000 25.7% Dover Dr. (Irvine Ave. to WestcliffDr.) 9,000 11,000 2,000 22.2% Dover Dr. (Westcliff Dr. to 16th St.) 22,000 24,000 2,000 9.1% Dover Dr. (16th St. to Cliff Dr.) 25,000 28,000 3,000 12.0% Dover Dr. (Cliff Dr. to Coast Hwy.) 29,000 34,000 5,000 17.2% Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at University Dr.) 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at Ford Rd.) 15,000 15,000 0 0.0% Ford Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 9,000 13,000 4,000 44.4% Goldenrod Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 2,000 0 0.0% Highland Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 2,000 2,000 0 0.0% Hospital Rd. (Placentia Ave. to Newport Blvd.) 13,000 19,000 6,000 46.2% Hospital Rd. (east of Newport Blvd.) 7,000 11,000 4,000 57.1% Irvine Ave. (Bristol St. South to Mesa Dr.) 27,000 38,000 11,000 40.7% Irvine Ave. (Mesa Dr. to University Dr.) 31,000 41,000 10,000 32.3% Irvine Ave. (University Dr. to Santa Isabel Ave.) 33,000 40,000 7,000 21.2% Irvine Ave. (Santa Isabel Ave. to Santiago Dr.) 29,000 33,000 4,000 13.8% Irvine Ave. (Santiago Dr. to Highland Dr.) 27,000 32,000 5,000 18.5% Irvine Ave. (Highland Dr. to Dover Dr.) 27,000 32,000 5,000 18.5% Irvine Ave. (Dover Dr. to WestcliffDr.) 22,000 29,000 7,000 31.8% Irvine Ave. (WestcliffDr. to 16th St.) 12,000 14,000 2,000 16.7% Jamboree Rd. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 36,000 48,000 12,000 33.3% Jamboree Rd. (Birch St. to MacArthur Blvd.) 42,000 54,000 12,000 28.6% Jamboree Rd. (MacArthur Blvd. to Bristol St. North) 36,000 44,000 8,000 22.2% Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 47,000 53,000 6,000 12.8% Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St. South to Bayview Wy.) 47,000 57,000 10,000 21.3% Jamboree Rd. (Bayview Wy. to University Dr.) 47,000 57,000 10,000 21.3% Jamboree Rd. (University Dr. to Bison Ave.) 37,000 41,000 4,000 10.8% Jamboree Rd. (Bison Ave. to Ford Rd.) 39,000 46,000 7,000 17.9% Jamboree Rd. (Ford Rd. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 46,000 56,000 10,000 21.7% Jamboree Rd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to Santa Barbara Dr.) 34,000 45,000 11,000 32.4% Jamboree Rd. (Santa Barbara Dr. to Coast Hwy.) 32,000 43,000 11,000 34.4% Jamboree Rd. ( Coast Hwy. to Bayside Dr.) 12,000 15;000 3,000 25.0% MacArthur Blvd. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 27,000 35,000 8,000 29.6% MacArthur Blvd. (Birch St. to Von Karman Ave.) 22,000 27,000 5,000 22.7% MacArthur Blvd. (Von Karman Ave, to Jamboree Rd.) 26,000 33,000 7,000 26.9% MacArthur Blvd. (south of Jamboree Rd.) 27,000 36,000 9,000 33.3% MacArthur Blvd. (north of Bison Ave.) 61,0001 75,0001 14,000 23.0% MacArthur Blvd. (Bison Ave. to Ford Rd.) 63,0001 74,0001 11,000 17.5% MacArthur Blvd. Ford Rd. to San Joaquin Hills Rd. 54,000 _61,0001 7,000 1 13.0% 5-15 i' TABLE 5.7 (PAGE 3 OF 4) SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH ' LOCATION EXISTING (200112002) I COUNT I SUBAREA MINIMUM FORECAST I GROWTH % GROWTH MacArthur Blvd. (San Joaquin'Hills Rd, to San Miguel Rd.) 35,000 38,000 3,000 8.6% MacArthur Blvd. (San Miguel Rd, to Coast Hwy.) 31,000 38,000 7,000 22.6% Marguerite Ave. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 7,000 7,000 0 0.0% Marguerite Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 6,000 6,000 0 0.0% Mesa Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 12,000 13,000 1,000 8.3% Newport Blvd. (north of Hospital Rd.) 36,000 47,000 11,000 30.6% ewport Blvd. (Hospital Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 43,000 54,000 11,000 25.6% Newport Blvd. (Coast Hwy. to Via Lido) 48,000 56,000 8,000 16.7% Newport Blvd. (Via Lido to 32nd St.) 36,000 41,000 5,000 13.9% Newport Blvd. (south of 32nd St.) 29,000 34,000 5,000 17.2% Newport Center Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 14,000 16,000 2,000 14.3% Newport Coast Dr. (SR-73 Fwy. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 17,000 29,000 12,000 70.6% Newport Coast Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 15,000 24,000 9,000 60.0% Newport Coast Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 12,000 19,000 7,000 58.3% Placentia Ave. (north of Superior Ave.) 12,000 17,000 5,000 41.7% Placentia Ave. (Superior Ave. to Hospital Rd.) 7,000 12,000 5,000 71.4% Poppy Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 2,000 0 0.0% Riverside Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 9,000 11,000 2,000 22.2% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to Santa Cruz Rd.) 16,000 17,000 1,000 6.3% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Cruz Rd. to Santa Rosa Rd.) 11,000 13,000 2,000 18.2% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Rosa Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 21,000 28,000 7,000 33.3% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (MacArthur Blvd. to San Miguel Rd.) 19,000 23,000 4,000 21.1% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (San Miguel Rd. to Marguerite Ave.) 18,000 24,000 6,000 33.3% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Marguerite Ave. to Spyglass Hill Rd.) 12,000 19,000 7,000 58.3% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Spyglass Hill Rd. to Newport Coast Dr.) 12,000 19,000 7,000 58.3% San Miguel Dr. (north of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 7,000 10,000 3,000 42.9% San Miguel Dr. (south of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 7,000 10,000 3,000 42.9% San Miguel Dr. (north of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 12,000 14,000 2,000 16.7% San Miguel Dr. (San Joaquin Hills Rd, to MacArthur Blvd.) 12,000 16,000 4,000 33.3% San Miguel Dr. (MacArthur Blvd. to Avocado Ave.) 19,000 20,000 1,000 5.3% San Miguel Dr. (west of Avocado Ave.) 10,000 11,000 1,000 10.0% Santa Barbara Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 10,000 13,000 3,000 30.0% Santa Cruz Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 8,000 9,000 1,000 12.5% Santa Rosa Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 11,000 14,000 3,000 27.3% Santiago Dr. (Tustin Ave. to Irvine Ave.) 5,000 6,000 1,000 20.0% Santiago Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 3,000 4,000 1,000 33.3% Spyglass Hill Rd. (San Miguel Dr. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 4,000, 4,000 0 0.0% Superior Ave. (north of Placentia Ave.) 17,000 19,000 2,000 11.8% Superior Ave. (Placentia Ave. to Hospital Rd.) 22,000 28,000 6,000 27.30o Superior Ave. (Hospital Rd. to Coast H 24,000 28,000 4,000 1 16.7% 5-16 TABLE 5-7 (PAGE 4 OF 4) SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH EXISTING SUBAREA (2001/2002) MINIMUM % COUNT FORECAST GROWTH GROWTH LOCATION Tustin Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 3,000 1,000 50.00° University Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 3,000 3,000 15,000 0 4,000 0.0 /o 36.4% University Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 11,000 8,000 10,000 2,000 25.0% Via Lido (east of Newport Blvd.) Von Korman Ave. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 14,000 19,000 5,000 35.7% V Korman Ave. (Birch St. to MacArthur Blvd.) 12,000 17,000 5,000 41.7% Won estcliff Dr. Irvine Ave. to Dover Dr.)16,000 16,000 0 0.0% U:\UcJobs\_01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xls]T5-7 1 I W 5-17 EXHIBIT 5-B SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIOS f ul �. .97 m e4+ rye :mn 10,6060. t 32 020 0.35 W LEGEND: 0.88 -VOLUME/ CAPACITY RATIO 1.10 0.59° 0.13 `` ''� PACIFIC "'w.,_�'' OCEAN NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Newport Beach Califomia-01232samin2 vcmxd , URBAN m • Dover Drive north of Westcliff Drive • Dover Drive north of Coast Highway • Jamboree Road north of Bayview Highway • Jamboree Road north of University Drive • Jamboree Road north of San Joaquin Hills Road • MacArthur Boulevard north of Bison Avenue • MacArthur Boulevard north of Ford Road • MacArthur Boulevard north of San Joaquin Hills Road • Newport Coast Drive north of SR-73 Northbound Ramps • Newport Boulevard south of Hospital Road • Jamboree Road south of Birch Street • Irvine Avenue south of University Drive • Hospital Road east of Newport Boulevard • Campus Drive east of MacArthur Boulevard • Bristol Street North east of Birch Street • Bristol Street South east of Birch Street • Coast Highway east of Dover Drive • Coast Highway east of Bayside Drive • Coast Highway east of Jamboree Road • Ford Road east of MacArthur Boulevard • Coast Highway east of MacArthur Boulevard • Coast Highway east of Goldenrod Avenue • Coast Highway east of Marguerite Avenue • Coast Highway east of Poppy Avenue • Coast Highway west of Superior Avenue/Balboa Boulevard • Coast Highway west of Riverside Drive • Bristol Street North west of Campus Drive • Bristol Street South west of Campus Drive • Dover Drive west of Irvine Avenue • Bristol Street South west of Jamboree Road 5-19 5.5 Peak Hour Forecasts The final data required to evaluate the Subarea Minimum General Plan Buildout scenario was intersection volume and geometric data for the 62 intersections selected for analysis (Bluff Road has been removed from this scenario, as there is no development on Banning Ranch). The same intersection configurations have been used as for the currently adopted General Plan Buildout with constrained network intersection capacity utilization values (ICUs). Table 5-8 summarizes the Subarea Minimum General Plan Buildout ICUs based on the AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes and the intersection geometric data as compared with currently adopted General Plan with constrained network ICUs. Appendix "U" contains the detailed ICU calculation worksheets. The worksheets in Appendix "U" summarize the intersection geometric data and the AM and PM peak Intersection turning movement volumes. A comparison of currently adopted General Plan Buildout ICUs to existing ICUs is shown on Table 5-9. Most of the large differences are caused by a change in the number of lanes causing additional capacity. Table 5-10 summarizes intersection analysis for buildout conditions. Deficient intersections are shown on Exhibit 5-C. Intersections with ICU values greater than 0.90 (LOS "E" or worse) in either peak period are: • Superior Avenue (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM/PM) • Newport Boulevard (NS)/Hospital Road (EW) (PM) • Riverside Drive (NS)/Coast Highway (P-W) (AM/PM) • Tustin Avenue (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/Campus Drive (EW) (PM) • Von Karman Avenue (NS)/Campus Drive (EW) (PM) • Jamboree Road (NS)/Campus Drive (EW) (AM/PM) • Campus Drive (NS)/Bristol Street North (EW) (AM/PM) • Birch Street (NS)/Bristol Street North (EW) (AM) 5-20 I TABLE 5.8 (PAGE 1 OF 2) ' SUBAREA MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR CURRENTLY CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA ADOPTED SUBAREA FORECAST MINIMUM DELTA FORECAST MINIMUM DELTA INTERSECTION NSIEW 1. Bluff Rd. & Coast Hw. 1.27 DNE N/A 1.29 DNE N/A 2. Superior Av. & Placentia AV. 0.64 0.73 0.09 0.68 0.86 0.18 3. Superior Av. & Coast Hw. 1.01 1.00 -0.01 0.99 0.95 -0.04 4. Newport BI & Hospital Rd. 0.79 0.84 0.05 0.97 1.01]0.....'03 5. Ne ortBI. & Via Lido 0.54 0.55 0.01 0.46 0.45 6. Newport BI. & 32nd St. 0.52 0.48 .0.04 0.71 0.637. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. 1.03 1.02 -0.018.TustinAv.&CoastHw. 1.02 1.04 0.02 0.85 0.879. MacArthur Bl. & Cam us Dr. 0.76 0.77 0.01 1.25 1.2910. MacArthur BI. & Birch St. 0.71 0.75 0.04 0.80 0.8611. Von Karman Av. & Ca us Dr. 0.66 0.69 0.03 0.93 0.9812. MacArthur BI. & Von Kannan AV.0.54 0.51 -0.03 0.64 0.6413. Jamboree Rd. & Cam us Dr. 0.92 0.93 0.01 1.24 1.2514. Jamboree Rd. & Birch St. 0.79 0.81 0.02 0.80 0.8015. Cam us Dr. & Bristol St. 0.96 0.97 0.01 1.08 1.08 16. Birch St. & Bristol St. 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.72 0.73 0.78 0.01 0.01 17. Campus Dr./Irvine AV. & Bristol St. S 0.93 0.93 0.00 0.77 0.54 0.01 18. Birch St. & Bristol St. S 0.52 0.54 0.02 0.53 0.91 0.01 19. Irvine Av. & Mesa Dr. 0.68 0.70 0.02 0.90 1.17 -0.02 20. Irvine Av. & Universi Dr. 1.14 1.15 0.01 1.19 0.78 0.00 21. Irvine Av. & Santia o Dr. 0.701 0.70 0.00 0.78 0.65 0.02 22. Irvine Av. & Hi hland Dr. 0.61 0.G2 0.01 0.63 0.72 0.02 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 0.78 0.79 0.01 0.70 0.82 0.80 -0.02 24, Irvine Av. & Westeliff Dr. 0.67 0.69 0.02 0.58 0.02 25. Dover Dr. & Westcliff Dr. 0.39 0.40 0.01 0.56 0.65 0.01 26. Dover Dr. & 16th St. 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.64 0.91 0.01 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.86 0.87 0.01 0.90 0.95 0.01 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.83 0.83 0.00 0.94 1.00 0.01 29. MacArthur BI. & Jamboree Rd. 0.96 0.96 0.00 0.99 0.69 0.00 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. 0.70 0.71 0.01 0.69 0.63 0.00 31. Bayvicw PI. & Bristol St. S 0.60 0.61 0.01 0.63 0.86 0.01 32. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. S 0.96 0.97 0.01 0.85 0.71 0.01 33. Jamboree Rd. & BayXiew WY, 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.01 34. Jamboree Rd. &HasibluffDr. /Universi Dr. 0.64 0.66 0.02 0.69 0.59 0.01 35. Jamboree Rd. & Bison AV. 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.58 0.01 36. Jamboree Rd. & EaslbluffDr./Ford Rd. 0.78 0.79 0.01 0.72 0.73 0.68 0.03 37. Jamboree Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 1 0.61 0.60 -0.01 0.65 11 TABLE 5-8 (PAGE 2 OF 2) ' SUBAREA MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE'INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN INTERSECTION NSIEW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR CURRENTLY ADOPTED FORECAST SUBAREA MINIMUM DELTA CURRENTLY ADOPTED FORECAST SUBAREA MINIMUM DELTA 38. Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbam Dr. 0.55 0.58 0.03 0.71 0.78 0.07 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.85 0.87 0.02 0.89 0.86 -0.03 0. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.36 0.38 0.02 0.34 0.36 0.02 41. Santa Rosa Dr. & Son Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.71 0.68 -0.03 2. Newport Center Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.631 0.62 -0.01 44. Avocado Av. & Son Miguel Dr. 0.37 0.39 0.02 0.79 0.79 0.00 45. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.77 0.80 0.03 0.80 0.83 0.03 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.47 0.47 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.00 47. SR-73 SB Rams & Bison Av. 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 48. MacArthur BI. & Bison Av. 0.78 0.79 0.01 0.80 0.81 0.01 49. MacArhtur BI. & Ford RdJBonita Canyon Dr. 0.77 0.78 0.01 1.06 1.06 0.00 50. MacArthur BI. & Son Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.77 0.81 0.04 1.04 1.06 0.02 51. MacArihurBl. & San Miguel Dr. 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.771 0.76 -0.01 52. MacAriburBl. & Coast Hw. 0.74 0.73 .0.01 0.83 039 -0.04 53. SR-73 NB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.53 0.53 0.00 54. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.45 0.46 0.01 0.59 0.59 0.00 55. San Mioucl Dr. & Spyglass Hill Rd. 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.00 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd. & San Miguel Dr. 0.52 0.55 0.03 0.68 0.68 0.00 57. Goldenrod Av. & Coast 14w. 1.08 1.06 -0.02 0.79 0.75 -0.04 58. Marguerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.51 0.50 -0.01 T%Margucrile Av. & Coast Hw. 0.90 0.89 -0.01 0.91 0.92 0.01 60. Spyglass Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.00 61. Poppy Av. & Coast Hw. 0.67 0.67 0.00 0.76 0.75 -0.01 62. Ncvrport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Ramps 0.541 0.53 .0.01 0.40 0.40 0.00 G4. Ne ort Coast Dr. & San loa uin Hills Rd. 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.47 0.48 0.01 65. Ne ort Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.571 0.56 .0.011 0.60 0.60 0.00 tDNE- Does Not Exist U:%UoJobs\ 012001012321Excell[01232.18.xls]T&B 5-22 TABLE 5.9 (PAGE 1 OF 2) ' SUBAREA MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING SUBAREA EXISTING SUBAREA COUNT MINIMUM DELTA COUNT MINIMUM DELTA INTERSECTION NSIEW 2. Superior Av. & Placentia AV. 0.66 0,73 0.07 0.67 0.86 0.19 3. SuperiorAV. & CoastHvv. 0.84 1.00 0.16 0.90 0.95 0.05 4. Newport BI. & Hos ital Rd. 0.54 0.84 0.30 0.70 1.01 0.31 5. Newport BI. & Via Lido 0.41 0.55 0.14 0.37 0.45JO..'44 6. Ne ort BI. & 32nd St. 0.73 0.48 , -0.25 0.78 0.637. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. 0.84 1.02 0.18 0.93 1.158. 0.80 1.04 0.24 0.67 0.879. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. MacArthur Bl. & Cam us Dr. 0.61 0.77 0.16 0.85 1.2910. MacArthur Bl. & Birch St. 0.49 0.75 0.26 0.66 0.8611, Von Kaman Av. & Cam us Dr. 0.55 0.69 0.14 0.79 0.98 12. MacArthur Bl. & Von Kerman Av. 0.46 0.51 0:05 0.53 0.64 0.11 13. Jamboree Rd. & Campus Dr. 0.70 0.93 0.23 0.85 1.25 0.40 14. Jamboree Rd. & Birch St. 0.61 0.81 0.20 0.60 0.80 0.20 15. Campus Dr. & Bristol St. 0.77 0.97 0.20 0.94 . 0.1 16. Birch St. & Bristol St. 0.66 0.92 0.26 0.61 0 .73 0.12 17. Campus Dr./Irvine Av. & Bristol St. S 0.72 0.93 0.21 0.58 0.78 0.20 18. Birch St. & Bristol St. S 0.46 0.54 0.08 0.44 0.54 0.10 19. Irvine AV. & Mesa Dr. 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.94 0.91 .0.03 20. Irvine Av. & Universi Dr. 0:82 1.15 0.33 0.89 1.17 0.28 21. Irvine AV. & Santia o Dr. 0.66 0.70 0.04 0.72' 0.78 0.06 22. Irvine AV. & Hi land Dr. 0.57 0.62 0.05 0.60 0.65 0.05 0.72 0.79 0.07 0.64 0.72 0.08 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 24.IrvineAV. &WestcliffDr. 0.57 0.69 0.12 0.77 0.80 0.03 25.DoverDr.&WestcliffDr. 0.38 0.40 0.02 0.48 0.58 0.10 26. Dover DI. & I6th St. 0.55 0.64 0.09 0.57 0.65 0.08 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 090 0.87, 0.17 0.74 0.91 0.17 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0069 0.83 0.14 0.70 0.95 0.25 29. MacArthur BI. & Jamboree Rd. 0.88 0.96 0.08 0.91 1.00 0.09 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. 0.55 0.71 0.16 0.59 0.69 0.10 31. Ba iew Pl. & Bristol St. S 0.48 0.61 0.13 0.56 0.63 0.07 e Rd. & Bristol St. S 0.75 0.97 0.22 0.72 0.86 0.14 e Rd. & Ba iew W . 0.41 0.48 0.07 0.57 0.71 0.14 e Rd. & Eastbluff Dr. /Universi Dr. 0.60 0.66 0.06 64 0.51 0.70 0.06 e Rd. &Bison Av. LiamborceRd. 0.45 0.51 0.06 0.51 0.59 0.08 e Rd. & Eastblff D/Ford Rd. 0.69 0.79 0.10 0.65 0.73 0.08e Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.80 0.60 -0.20 ].00 0.68 -032 5-23 TABLE5.9 (PAGE 2 OF 2) SUBAREA MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO EXISTING INTERSECTION NSIEW AM PEAK HOUR I PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING COUNT SUBAREA MINIMUM DELTA EXISTING COUNT SUBAREA MINIMUM DELTA 38. Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbam Dr. 0.47 0.58 0.11 0.63 0.78 0.15 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.68 0.87 0.19 0.74 0,86 0.12 40. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.36 0.38 0.02 0.36 0.36 0.00 41. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 032 0.39 0.07 0.52 0.68 0.16 42. Newport Center Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.40 0.50 0.10 0.52 0.62 0.10 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.33 0.39 0.06 0.72 0.79 0.07 45. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.58 0.80 0.221 0,661 0.83 0.17 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.31 0.47 0.16 0.37 0.56 0.19 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.26 038 0.12 0.17 0.29 0.12 48. MacArthur Bl. & Bison Av. 0.63 0.79 0.16 0.60 0.81 0.21 49. MacArhtur Bl. & Ford RdJBonita Canyon Dr. 0.71 0.78 0.07 0.90 1.06 0.16 50. MacArthur Bl. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.64 0.81 0.17 0.93 1.06 0.13 51. MacArthur BI. & San Miguel Dr. 0.56 0.63 0.07 0.65 0.76 0.11 52.MacArthurBl.&CoastHw. 0.60 0.73 0.131 0.711 0.79 0.08 53. SR-73 NB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.55 0.69 0.14 0.43 0.53 0.10 54. SR-73 SD Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.30 0.46 0.16 0.41 0.59 0.18 55. San Miguel Dr. & Spyglass Hill Rd. 0.28 0.30 0.02 0.31 0.38 0.07 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd. & San Miguel Dr. 0.44 0.55 0.11 0.54 0.68 0.14 57. Goldentod Av. & Coast Hw. 0.99 1.06 0.07 0.69 0.75 0.06 58. Mar trite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.31 038 0.07 0.35 0.50 0.15 59.Mar critc Av. & Coast Hw. 0.83 0.891 0.06 0.821 0.92 0.10 60. Spyglass Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.44 0.60 0.16 0.30 0.46 0.16 61. Po Av. & Coast Hw. 0.61 0.67 0.06 0.65 0.75 0.10 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Rams 0.45 0.53 0.08 0.31 0.40 0.09 64. Newport Coast Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.37 0.63 0.26 0.29 0.48 0.19 65. Newport Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.47 0.56 0.09 0.50 0.60 0.10 'U:1UcJobsl_01200101232\Excell[01232-18.xls]T5-9 5-24 TABLE 5-10 (PAGE 1 OF 2) ' SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS/EW AM PEAK HOUR 1(;u PM PEAK HOUR U LOS 2. Superior Av. & Placentia Av. 0.73 C 0.86 D 3. Su erior Av. & Coast Hw. 1.00 E 0.95 E ort Bl. & Hos ital Rd. 0.84 D 1.01 F 5. Newport Bl. & Via Lido 0.55 A 0.45 A 6. Newport Bl. & 32nd St. 0.48 A 0.63 B 7. Riverside Av. &Coast Hw. 1.02 F 1.15 F 8. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. 1.04 F 0.87 D 9. MacArthur Bl. & Campus Dr. 0.77 C 1.29 F 10. MacArthur Bl. & Birch St. 035 C 0.86 D 11. Von Kerman Av. & C us Dr. 0.69 B 0.98 E 12. MacArthur Bl. & Von Karman Av. 0.51 A 0.64 B 13. Jamboree Rd. & Cam us Dr. 0.93 E 1.25 F 14. Jamboree Rd. & Birch St. 0.81 C 0.80 C 15. Cam us Dr. &Bristol St. 0.97 E 1.08 F 16. Birch St. &Bristol St. 0.92 E 0.73 C 17. Cam us Dr./Irvine Av. &Bristol St. S 0.93 E 0.78 C 18. Birch St. & Bristol St. S 0.54 A 0.54 A 19. Irvine Av. & Mesa Dr. 0.70 B 0.91 E 20. Irvine Av. & University Dr. 1.15 F 1.17 F 21. Irvine Av. & Santiago Dr. 0.70 B 0.78 C 22. Irvine Av. & Hi bland Dr. 0.62 B 0.65 B 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 0.79 C 0.72 C 24. Irvine Av. & Westcliff Dr. 0.69 B 0.80 C 25. Dover Dr. & WestcliffDr. 0.40 A 0.58 A 26. Dover Dr. & 16th St. 0.64 B 0.65 B 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.87 D 0.91 E 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.83 D 0.95 E 29. MacArthur Bl. & Jamboree Rd. 0.96 E 1.00 E 30.7amboree Rd. & Bristol St. 0.71 C 0.69 B 31. Ba iew PI. & Bristol St. S 0.61 B 0.63 B 32. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. S 0.97 E 0.86 D 33. Jamboree Rd. & Bayview W • 0.48 A 0.71 C 34.7amboree Rd. & Eastb]uffDr. /University Dr. 0.66 E 0.70 B 35. Jamboree Rd. & Bison Av. 0.51 A 0.59 A 36. Jamboree Rd. & EastbluffDr.lFord Rd. 0.79 C 0.73 C 37. Jamboree Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.60 A 0.68 E 5-25 i� TABLE 5-10 (PAGE 2 OF 2) ' SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS/EW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 38. Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbara Dr. 0.58 A 0.78 C 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.87 D 0.86 D 40. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.38 A 0.36 A 41. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.39 A 0.68 B 42. Newport Center Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.50 A 0.62 B 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.391 A 0.79 C 45. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.80 C 0.83 D 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.47 A 0.56 A 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.38 A 0.29 A 48. MacArthur Bl. & Bison Av. 0.79 C 0.81 D 49. MacArhtur Bi, & Ford Rd./Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.78 C 1.06 F 50. MacArthur Bl. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.81 D 1.06 F 51. MacArthur Bl. & San Mi uel Dr. 0.63 B 0.76 C 52. MacArthur Bl. & Coast Hw. 0.73 C 0.79 C 53. SR-13 NB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.69 B 0.53 A 54. SR 73 SB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.46 A 0.59 A 55. San Miguel Dr. & Spyglass Hill Rd. 0.30 A 0.38 A 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd. & San Miguel Dr. 0.55 A 0.68 B 57. Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw. 1.06 F 0.75 C 58. Marguerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.38 A 0.50 A 59.Mar erite Av. & Coast Hw. 0.89 D 0.92 E 60. Spyglass Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.601 A 0.46 A 61. Poppy Av. & Coast Hw. 0.67 B 0.75 C 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Rams 0.53 A 0.40 A 64. Newport Coast Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.63 B 0.48 A 65. Newport Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.56 A 0.60 A U:1UcJobs\ 01200\012321Excell(01232-18.xls)T5-10 5-26 EXHIBIT 5-C SUBAREA MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE WITH OPEN SPACE NETWORK DEFICIENCIES LEGEND: - ' = AM LOS "E" A PM Los nr t .• gym, � AM LOS "F" PM LOS "Fff \TR♦ ; ; ♦.� , PACIFIC OCEAN • Campus Drive (NS)/Bristol Street South (EW) (AM) • Irvine Avenue (NS)/Mesa Drive (EW) (PM) • Irvine Avenue (NS)/University Drive (EW) (AM/PM) • Dover Drive (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (PM) • Bayside Drive (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (PM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/Jamboree Road (EW) (AM/PM) • Jamboree Road (NS)/Bristol Street South (EW) (AM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/Ford Road/Bonita Canyon Drive (EW) (PM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/San Joaquin Hills Road (EW) (PM) • Goldenrod Avenue (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM) • Marguerite Avenue (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (PM) The only intersection that does not now experience a deficiency that did experience one before is Bluff Road (NS) at Coast Highway (EW). Bluff Road is not included in this scenario, as there is no development on Banning Ranch. Two additional intersections experience deficiencies (Irvine Avenue (NS) at Mesa Drive (EW) and Dover Drive (NS) at Coast Highway (EW)). Additional locations experience changes in levels of service. Intersection analysis has been performed to determine improvements necessary to provide acceptable levels of service. ICU worksheets are included in Appendix W". Table 5-11 compares the ICU results with and without improvements. Improvements necessaryto provide acceptable levels of service are shown in Table 5-12. Improvements have been developed that provide acceptable operations at all potentially deficient intersections. The feasibility of the necessary improvements is questionable at some locations (particularly where additional through lanes are necessary). TABLE 5.11 (PAGE 1 OF 2) SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) SUMMARY t 5-29 J TABLE 541 (PAGE 2 OF 2) ' SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN SUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS/EW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR FUTURE FORECAST WITH IMPROVEMENTS DELTA FUTURE FORECAST WITH IMPROVEMENTS DELTA 38. Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbara Dr. 0.58 0.58 0100 0.78 0.78 0:00 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.87 0.87 0.00 0.86 0.86 0.00 40. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.00 41. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.00 42.,Newport Center Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.501 0.50 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.00 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.39 0.39 0.001 0.79 0.79 0.00 45. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.80 0.80 0.00 0.831 0.83 0.00 46. SR-73 NB Rams & Bison Av. 0.47 0.47 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.00 47. SR-73 SB Rams & Bison Av. 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 48. MacArthur BI. & Bison Av. 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.00 9.'MaeArhturBl.&Ford Rd./BonitaCanyon Dr. 0.78 0.73 .0.05 1.06 0,86 -0.20 50. MacArthur BI. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.81 0.70 -0.11 1.06 0.85 -0.21 51. MacArthur BI. & San Miguel Dr. 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.00 52. MocAnhur BI. & Coast Hw. 0.73 0.73 0.00 0.79 0.79 0.00 53. SR-73 NB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.69 0.69 0.001 0.53 0.53 0.00 54. SR-73 SB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.46 0.46 0.00 0.59 0.59 0.00 55. San Miguel Dr. &Spy0assHill Rd. 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.00 56. SonJon uin Hills Rd. & San Miguel Dr. 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.681 0,68 0.00 57. Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw. 1.06 0.77 -0.29 0.75 0.75 0.00 58. Marguerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.38 0,38 0.00 0.5D 0.50 0.00 59.Maruerite Av. & Coast Hw. 0.89 0.89 0.00 0.92 0.80 ' .0.12 6D. Spy ass Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.00 GI. Po Av. & Coast Hw. 0.67 0.67 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.00 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Rams 0,53 0.53 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.00 64, Newport Coast Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.63 0.631 0.00 0.48 0.48 0,00 65. Newport Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.56 0.56 0.00 0!601 0.60 0.00 tDNE = Does Not Exist U.\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\101232-18.x1s]T5.11 5-30 n a 0 U, TABLE 5-12 (PAGE 1 OF 2) SUBAREA MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT Superior Av. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Construct 1 st NB right turn lane. Install SB right turn overlap phasing. Construct 4th EB through lane. Construct 5th WB through lane. Newport BI. (NS) at Hospital Rd. (EW) Construct 2nd NB left turn lane. Restripe 2nd WB through lane to shared through left lane. Change ENV phasing to Split. Riverside Av. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Construct SB free right turn lane. Construct 2nd EB left turn lane. Construct 3rd EB through lane. Construct 4th WB through lane. Eliminate WB right turn lane. Tustin Av. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Construct 3rd EB through lane. MacArthur BI. (NS) at Campus Dr. (EW) Construct 2nd NB left turn lane. Construct SB free right turn lane. Von Kerman Av. (NS) at Campus Dr. (EW) Construct 1 st SB right turn lane. r Construct Ist WB right turn lane. Jamboree Rd. (NS) at Campus Dr. (EW) Construct NB free right turn lane. Construct 4th SB through lane. Construct 1 st SB right turn lane. Construct 3rd EB left turn lane. Construct WB free right turn lane. Campus Dr. (NS) at Bristol St. N (EW) Construct SB shared through right lane. Construct 5th WB through lane. Construct 1 st WB right turn lane. Birch St. (NS) at Bristol St. N (EW) Construct 3rd NB through -lane. Construct 1st WB right turn lane. Cam us DrArvine Av. (NS) at Bristol St. S EW Construct 1st NB right turn lane. Irvine Av. (NS) at University Dr. (EW) Construct 3rd NB through lane. Construct 3rd SB through lane. Restripe 2nd EB through lane to shared through left lane. Change EIW phasing to Split. w N TABLE 542 (PAGE 2 OF 2) SUBAREA MINIMUM ALTERNATIVE ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT Bayside Dr. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Restripe SB through lane to shared through left lane. Convert SB defacto to 1st SB right turn lane. Install SB right turn overlap phasing. Construct 1st W B right turn lane. MacArthur BI. (NS) at Jamboree Rd. (EW) Construct 4th NB through lane. Construct 4th EB through lane. Construct 3rd W B left turn lane. Jamboree Rd. (NS) at Bristol St. S EW) Construct 2nd EB left turn lane. MacArthur BI. (NS) at Ford Rd./Bonita Canyon Dr. (EW) Construct 3rd SB left turn lane. Construct 3rd EB through lane. MacArthur Bl. (NS) at San Joaquin Hills Rd. (EW) Construct 4th NB through lane. Construct 3rd EB left turn lane. Goldenrod Av. (NS) at Coast Hw. EW Construct 3rd W B through lane. Eliminate WB defacto right turn lane. Mar uerite Av. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Construct 3rd EB through lane. Eliminate EB right turn lane. U:1UcJobsl 012001012321Excell[01232-18.xls]T5-12 M M = M M M= M M M M M M M m m= M 6 0 SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (POST-202� ALTERNATIVE WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK SCENARIO This chapter presents subarea maximum (as defined in the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) alternatives) General Plan Buildout (Post-2025) with constrained network conditions. General Plan Buildout model inputs are discussed and refined forecast volumes are presented. Data are compared to existing conditions to show reasonable growth and to currently adopted General Plan Conditions (as defined in Chapter 3 of this report) results to show differences. 6.1 Land Use and Socioeconomic Data (SED) This section discusses the land use and socioeconomic data inputs. 6.1.1 Subarea Maximum General Plan Buildout Land Use Data The Subarea Maximum General Plan Buildout land use data was provided to Urban Crossroads, Inc. staff by City staff and the City's General Plan consultant, EIP Associates. Appendix "W" of this report documents the explicit land use data included' in NBTM 3.1 for subarea maximum General Plan Buildout conditions in this analysis. Table 6-1 summarizes the overall subarea maximum General Plan Buildout land uses for the City of Newport Beach. Appendix "X" contains the land use changes by TAZ compared to the currently adopted General Plan scenario. An overall comparison to currently adopted General Plan land use is also shown in Table 6-1. Land uses have changed based on data provided by the City. The largest increases in land use compared to currently adopted General Plan conditions occur in the Airport Area and in Newport Center/Fashion Island. Table 6-2 shows subarea maximum General Plan Buildout land use growth from existing. Apartments grow substantially (by more than 12,000 dwelling units). Categories that grow by more than 500,000 square feet 6-1 TABLE 6.1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE COMPARISON NBTM CODE? DESCRIPTION UNITS ADOPTED QUANTITY SUBAREA MAXIMUM QUANTITY CHANGE %CHANGE 1 LowDensit Residential DU 18,347 18,936 589 3,21% 2 Medium Density Residential DU 12,859 12,675 184 -1A3% 3 Apartment DU 13,374 21,489 8.115 60.68% 4 Elderly Residential DU 200 200 0.00% 5 Mobile Home DU 455 455 0.00% TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DU 45,235 53,755 1 1,520 18,83% 6 Motel ROOM 139 49 90 -64,75% 7 Hotel ROOM 3.387 4.3301 943 27.84% 9 Regional Commercial TSF 1,633.840 1,559.000 74.840 -4.58% 10 General Commercial TSF 4,627.760 5,377.611 749.851 16.20% 11 Commerclai/Recreation ACRE 5.100 5.100 0.003/. 13 Restaurant TSF 198.780 198.780 0.00% 15 Fast Food Restaurant TSF 13.940 13.940 0.00% 16 Auto Dealer/Sales TSF 227,170 227.170 0.00% 17 1 Yacht Club TSF 70.310 70.310 0.00% 18 Health Club TSF 61.330 61.330 0.00% 19 Tennis Club CRT 59 59 0.00% 20 Marina SLIP 1,055 1,055 0.00% 21 Theater SEAT 5,475 5,475 0.00% 22 Newport Dunes ACRE 64.00 64.00 0.00% 23 General Office TSF 1 12,305.620 11.518.013 787.607 -6.40% 24 Medical/GOVemment Office TSF 910.616 1,859.090 948.474 104.16% 25 Research & Development TSF 81.730 81.730 0.00% 26 Industrial TSF 1,956.092 935.922 1,019.170 -52.10% 27 Mini-Storage/Warehouse TSF 196.420 196.420 0.00% 28 Pre-school/Day Care TSF 56.770 56.770 0.00% 29 Elementary/Private School STU 4.455 4,955 500 11.22% 30 Junior/High School STU 4,765 4,765 0.00% 31 Cultural/Learning Center TSF 40.000 98.000 58.000 145.00°% 32 Library TSF 78.840 78.840 0.00% 33 Post Office TSF 73.700 63.800 9.900 -13.43% 34 Hospital BED 1,265 1,265 0.00% 35 Nursin /Conv. Home BEDS 661 661 0.00% 36 Church TSF 467.210 441.200 26.010 -5.57% 37 Youth Ctr./Service TSF 166.310 172.310 6.000 3.61% 38 Park ACRE 94.920 171.920 77.000 81.12% 39 Regional Park ACRE 45.910 45.910 0.00% 40 Golf Course JACRE 1 298.290 298.290 0.00% 1 Uses 8, 12, and 14 are part of the old NBTAM model structure and are not currently utilized in ' the City land use datasels. 2 Units Abbreviations: DU = Dwelling Units TSF = Thousand Square Feet CRT = Court STU = Students U:1UWobsl 012001012321ExceP401232-laxisiTO.1 6-2 TABLE 6.2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE GROWTH FROM EXISTING NBTM CODE' DESCRIPTION UNITS 2002 QUANTITY MAXIMUM QUANTITY GROWTH %GROWTH 1 Low Density Residential DU 17,124 18,936 1,812 10.58 0 2 Medium Density Residential DU 9,535 12,675 3,1401 32.931/0 3 A artmant DU 9,199 21,489 12,290 133.60% 4 E1derl Residential DU 200 200 0.00% 5 Mobile Home DU 600 455 145 -24.17% TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DU 36,658 53,755 17,097 46.64% 6 Motel ROOM 134 49 85 -W.43 0 7 Hotel ROOM 2,821 4,330 1,5091 53.497o 9 Re Tonal Commercial TSF 1,259.000 1,559.000 300.000 23.83% 10 General Commercial TSF 3,696.781 5,377.611 1,680.830 45.47% 11 Commercial/Recreation ACRE 5.100 5.100 - 0.00% 13 Restaurant TSF 99.370 198.780 99.410 100.04% 15 Fast Food Restaurant TSF 13.940 13.940 0.00% 16 Auto Dealer/Sales TSF 172.420 227.170 54.750 31.75%I 17 Yacht Club TSF 51.830 70.310 18.480 35.66% 18 Health Club TSF 16.770 61.330 45 265.71% 19 Tennis Club CRT 60 59 1 1.67% 20 Marina SLIP 1,055 1,055 - 0.00% 21 Theater SEAT 5,489 5,475 14 -0.26% 22 Newport Dunes ACRE 64.00 64.00 0.00% 23 General Office TSF 10.865.733 11,518.013 652.280 6.00% 24 Medical/GovernmentOfFlce TSF 795.926 1,859.090 1,063.164 133.58% 25 Research & Dove lo ment TSF 81.730 81.730 - 0.00% 26 industrial TSF 1,291.079 936.922 354.157 -27.43% 27 Mini-Storage/Warehouse TSF 196.420 196.420 0.00% 28 Pre-school/Dayare TSF 55.820 56.770 0.950 1.70% 29 Elements /Private School STU 4,399 - 4,955 556 12.65% 30 Junlor/Hi h School STU 4,765 4,765 - 0.00% 31 Cultural/Leaming Center TSF 35.000 98.000 63.000 180.00% 32 Libra 78.840 - 0.00% 33 Post Office 63.800 10.100 18.81% 34 Hospital 1 1,265 914 260.40% 35 Nursin /Conv. Home 1 W35 661 - 0.00% 36 Church 0 441.200 63.440 16.79% 37 YouthCtr./Service 0 172.31022.750 15.21% 38 Park 0 171.920 57.950 50.85% 39 Re lonal Park ACRE 45.910 45.910 NY 40 GalfCourse ACRE 305.330 298.290 7.04 2.31% 1 Uses 8,12, and 14 are part of the old NBTAM model structure and are not currently utilized In the City land use datasets. 2 Units Abbreviations: DU = Dwelling Units TSF = Thousand Square Feet CRT = Court STU = Students U:1UOJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\101232-18xlsIT6-2 6-3 6.2 include general commercial, general office, and medical/government office. Quantities that decrease in one category correlate to an increase in another category. 6.1.2 Subarea Maximum General Plan Buildout Socioeconomic Data (SED) Subarea Maximum General Plan Buildout SED that has been converted from land use is summarized in Table 6-3. Table 6-3 also contains a comparison of Subarea Maximum General Plan Buildout SED to existing SED for the City of Newport Beach. The total number of dwelling units are projected to grow by 15,973 units (47 %) from existing conditions. For total employment, an increase of 17,312 employees (27%) is anticipated. Socioeconomic data for the remainder of the primary modeling area (and for Newport Coast, where land use data was unavailable) has been unchanged from the currently adopted General Plan data. Trip Generation Table 6-4 summarizes the overall trip generation for Subarea Maximum General Plan Buildout conditions for the City of Newport Beach and compares it to existing conditions ,trip generation. Appendix "Y" contains a report of trip generation by NBTM TAZ for the City of Newport Beach. Most of these trips have been calculated from the final General Plan Buildout SED presented previously. Supplemental trips are unchanged from the previously published data. The overall trip generation for the City of Newport Beach is an estimated 961,043 daily vehicle trips. Table 6-5 compares subarea maximum General Plan buildout trip generation to currently adopted General Plan buildout trip generation. Total trip generation increases by approximately 81,284 daily trips (9.24%). Trip generation has increased primarily in the Airport Area and Newport Center/Fashion Island. Appendix "Z" shows the zone by zone trip generation comparison. I TABLE 6-3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH' SUBAREA MAXIMUM LAND USE BASED SOCIOECONOMIC DATA SUMMARY/COMPARISON VARIABLE 2002 QUANTITY UBAREA MAXIMUM QUANTITY GROWTH % GROWTH Occupied Single Family Dwelling Units 15,9701 17,738 1,768 11% Occupied Multi -Family Dwelling Units 18,2941 32,499 14,205 78% TOTAL OCCUPIED DWELLING UNITS 34,2641 50,237 15,973 47% Group Quarters Population 661 661 0 0% Population 75,211 105,240 30,029 40% Employed Residents 44,635 64,711 20,076 45% Retail Employees 10,9701 15,171 4,201 38% Service Employees 17,2951 24,413 7,118 41% Other Employees 36,9901 42,983 5,993 16% TOTAL EMPLOYEES 65,2551 82,567 17,312 27% Elem/Hi h School Students 9,164 9,670 506 6% 1 Includes data converted from land use only. Excludes Newport Coast and recent annexation areas. U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xIsIT 6-3 6-5 TABLE 6.4 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MAXIMUM TRIP GENERATION GROWTH FROM EXISTING TRIP PURPOSE DAILY TRIP ENDS GROWTH PERCENT GROWTH EXISTING SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERALPLAN BUILDOUT Home Based Work Productlons 57,819 86;096 28,277 48.91% Home Based Work Attractions 81,964 105,777 23,813 29.05% Home Based School Productions 11,336 16,455 5,119 45.16% Home Based School Attractions 8,730 9,241 511 5.85% Home Based Other Productions' 127,338 190,690 63,352 49.75% Home Based Other Attractions 109,815 153,318 43,503 39,61% Work Based OtherProductions 52,152 68,900 16,748 32.11% Work Based Other Attractions 57,035 76,043 19,008 33.33% Other - Other Productions 91,218 128,072 36,854 40.40% Other - Other Attractions 89,734 126,4511 36,7171 40.920' TOTAL PRODUCTIONS 1 339,8631 490,2131 150,3501 44.24% TOTAL ATTRACTIONS 1 347,2781 470,8301 123,5521 35.58% OVERALLTOTAL 1 687,1411 961,0431 273,902 39.86% 1 Home -Work includes Home -Work and Home -University trips, consistent with OCTAM mode choice output. ' Home -Other includes Home -Shop and, Home -Other trips, consistent with OCTAM mode choice output. U:\UcJobsl 01200\01232\Excelk[01232-18.xls]T 6-4 M. TABLE 6-5 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SUBAREA MAXIMUM TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON DAILYTRIP ENDS SUBAREA CURRENTLY MAXIMUM ADOPTED GENERAL GENERALPLAN PERCENT RIP PURPOSE PLAN BUILDOUT BUILDOUT GROWTH GROWTH Based Work Productions 73,968 86,096 12,128 3,547 16.40% 3.47% Based Work Attractions 102,230 14,475 105,777 16,455 1,980 13.68% Feed Based School Productions 8,845 9,241 396 4.48% Based School Attractions 174,257 190,690 16,433 9.43% Based Other Productions' 138,334 153,318 14,9B4 10.83% Based Other Attractions 65,462 68,900 3,4185.22%ased ased Other Productions 71,335 76,043 4,708 6,60% Other Attractions 116,275 128,072 11,797 10.15%- Other Productions 114,558 126,451 11,893 10.38% Other Attractions 444,457 490,21345,756 10.29% L PRODUCTIONS 435,302 470,830 35,528 8.16% L ATTRACTIONS 961,043 81,284 9.24% 879,759 OVERALL TOTAL Home -Work includes Home-Wo choice output. ' Home -Other includes Home-Sh( choice output. ' U:\UcJobs\_01210\01232\Excel\101232-1E 6.3 Traffic Assignment The roadway system for the Subarea Maximum General Plan is identical to the constrained roadway system presented in Chapter 3 of this report. Exhibit 6-A summarizes the NBTM 3.1 refined Subarea Maximum General Plan Buildout with constrained network daily traffic volumes throughout the City of Newport Beach. Changes from the currently adopted General Plan Baseline forecasts are shown on Table 6-6. Volume changes occur primarily because of land use changes in the Airport Area and Newport Center/Fashioh Island. Roadways that experience the most change include Coast Highway, Jamboree Road and Newport Boulevard. Table 6-7 compares these refined forecasts to existing counted volumes (presented in the General Plan Baseline document). The highest daily traffic volume increases occur on Coast Highway, MacArthur Boulevard, and Newport Boulevard. Each of these facilities experience an increase of 15,000 vehicles per day or more. Daily Capacity Analysis Daily roadway segment capacity analysis has been performed at study area roadways, and is shown on Exhibit 6-B. The following roadway segments are expected to operate with daily V/C greater than 0.90; • Newport Boulevard north of Hospital Road • Newport Boulevard north of Via Lido • Riverside Avenue north of Coast Highway • Jamboree Road north of Campus Drive • Jamboree Road north of Birch Street • Irvine Avenue north of University Drive • Irvine Avenue north of Santiago Drive W. EMIT SUBAREA VERAG ALTERNATIVE ADAI YNTRA FIIC (A T) 29 16 3 i-1`57 15`\1�iW 7 3 zn dso 27 43 d 41 78 i ' t0 11 u� V10 yJ 3 / 2 17 10 17 i 75 41 34 49 c 0 15 � 13 4 10 a� 14 33 1 59 62 15 10111112 17 18 17 3 11 `.a 130 4 130 �% ) `1 1I42 20 1V~ 6 a \ \, - �— 62 4 23 3 LEGEND: 10 - VEHICLES PER DAY (1000-S) 232 46 � � 6\\� PACIFIC 10 38 �•'/ OCPJW V CtL\ URBAN NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Newport 8each.Califomia-01232:SAmaxl.mxd I.l TABLE 6.6 (PAGE 1 OF 4) t SUBAREA MAXIMUM ALTERNATIVE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON LOCATION ADOPTED (CONSTRAINED) BUILDOUT I FORECAST CHANGE % CHANGE 16th St. (Irvine Ave. to Dover Dr.) 6,000 6,000 0 0.0% 32nd St. (west of Newport Blvd.) 9;000 10,000 1,000 1 IA% 32nd St, (east of Newport Blvd.) 5,000 6,000 1,000 20.0% Avocado Ave. (north of San Miguel Dr.) 5,000 6,000 1,000 20.0% Avocado Ave. (south of San Miguel Dr.) 12,000 13,000 1,000 8.3% Avocado Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 10,000 12,000 2,000 20.0% Balboa Blvd. (south of Coast Hwy.) 22,000 23,000 1,000 4.5% Bayside Dr. (south of Coast Hwy.) 12,000 13,000 1,000 8.3% Birch St. (Jamboree Rd. to Von Kansan Ave.) 18,000 21,000 3,000 16,7% Birch St. (Von Karman Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 20,000 22,000 2,000 10.0% Birch St. (west of MacArthur Blvd.) 20,000 22,000 2,000 10.0% Birch St. (north of Bristol St. North) 27,000 29,000 2,000 7A% Birch St. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 20,000 211000 1,000 5.0% Birch St. (south of Bristol St. South) 16,000 16,000 0 0.0% Bison Ave. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 17,000 18,000 1,000 5.9% Bison Ave. (MacArthur Blvd. to SR 73 Fwy.) 11,000 11,000 0 0.0% Bluff Rd. (Coast Hwy. to 15th St.) 13,000 11,000 -2,000 -15.4% B1uff.Rd. (15th St, to 17th St.) 13,000 11,000 -2,000 -15.4% Bluff Rd. (17th St. to 19th St.) 12,000 11,000 -1,000 -8.3% Bonita Canyon Dr. (east of MacArthur -Blvd.) 34,000 34,000 0 0.0% Bonita Canyon Dr. (west of SR-73 Fwy.) 27,000 27,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. North (west of Campus Dr.) 32,000 33,000 1,000 3.1% Bristol St. North (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 28,000 29,000 1,000 3.6% Bristol St. North (east of Birch St.) 27,000 28,000 1,000 3.7% Bristol St. North (west of Jamboree Rd.) 18,000 19,000 1,000 5.6% Bristol St. South (west of Campus DrArvine Ave.) 32,000 33,000 1,000 3.1% Bristol St. South (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 23,000 23,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. South (east of Birch St.) 22,000 22,000 0 0.0% Bristol St. South (westof Jamboree Rd.) 37,000 38,000 1,000 2.7% Campus Dr. (Jamboree Rd. to Von Korman Ave.) 22,000 23,000 1,000 4.5% Campus Dr. (Von Kansan Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 31,000 32,000 1,000 3.2% Campus Dr. (west of MacArthur Blvd.) 39,000 40,000 1,000 2.6% Campus Dr. (north of Bristol St. North) 39,OOd 39,000 0 0.0% Campus Dr. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 40,000 41,000 1,000 2.5% Coast Hwy. (west of 15th St.) 60,000 63,000 3,000 5.0% Coast Hwy, (Bluff Rd. to Superior AveJBalboa Blvd.) 61,000 64,000 3,000 4.9% Coast Hwy. (Superior Ave. to Newport Blvd.) 41,000 42,000 1,000 2.4% Coast Hwy. (Newport Blvd. to Riverside Ave.) 68,000 73,000 5,000 7.4% Coast Hwy, (Riverside Ave. to Tustin Ave.) 59,000 63,000 4,000 6.80 Coast H(Tustin Ave. to Dover Dr. 55,000 59,000 4,000 7.30 6-10 TABLE 6-6 (PAGE 2 OF 4) SUBAREA MAXIMUM ALTERNATIVE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON LOCATION ADOPTED (CONSTRAINED) 78,000 64,000 BUILDOUT FORECAST 83,000 67,000 CHANGE 5,000 3,000 % CHANGE 6.4% 4.7% Coast Hwy. (Dover Dr. to Bayside Dr.) Coast Hwy. (Bayside Dr. to Jamboree Rd.) 51,000 54,000 3,000 5.9% Coast Hwy. (Jamboree Rd. to Newport Center Dr.) 43,000 44,000 1,000 2.3% Coast Hwy. (Newport Center Dr. to Avocado Ave.) 45,000 46,000 1,000 2.2% Coast Hwy. (Avocado Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 48,000 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. (MacArthur Blvd. to Goldenrod Ave.) 48,000 46,000 46,000 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. (Goldenrod Ave. to Marguerite Ave.) 42,000 42,000 0 0.0% Coast Hwy. (Marguerite Ave. to Poppy Ave.) 35,000 35,000 0 0.00/0 Coast Hwy. (Poppy Ave. to Newport Coast Dr.) 44,000 45,000 1,000 2.30/c Coast Hwy (east of Newport Coast Dr.) 11,000 11,000 0 0.0% Dover Dr. (Irvine Ave. to Westcliff Dr.) 24,000 25,000 1,000 4.2% Dover Dr. (Westcliff Dr. to 16th St.) 28,000 28,000 0 0.0% Dover Dr. (16th St. to Cliff Dr.) 33,000 34,000 1,000 3.0°% Dover Dr. (Cliff Dr. to Coast Hwy.) 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at University Dr.) 0 0.0% Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at Ford Rd.) 15,000 15,000 0 0.0% Ford Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 13,000 13,000 3,000 -1,000 -25.0% Goldenrod Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 4,000 2,000 2,000 0 0.0% Highland Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 18,000 22,000 4,000 22.2% Hospital Rd. (Placentia Ave. to Newport Blvd.) 10,000 13,000 3,000 30.0% Hospital Rd. (east of Newport Blvd.) 38,000 39,000 1,000 2.6% Irvine Ave. (Bristol St. South to Mesa Dr.) 41,000 42,000 1,000 2.4% Irvine Ave. (Mesa Dr. to University Dr.) 40,000 41,000 1,000 2.5% Irvine Ave. (University Dr. to Santa Isabel Ave.) 33,000 33,000 0 0.0% Irvine Ave. (Santa Isabel Ave. to Santiago Dr.) 32,000 33,000 1,000 3.1 /° Irvine Ave. (Santiago Dr. to Highland Dr.) 33,000 1,000 3.1% Irvine Ave. (Highland Dr. to Dover Dr.) 28,000 7.1% Irvine Ave. (Dover Dr. to Westcliff Dr.) 13,000 13,000 14,000 14,000 1,000 1,000 Irvine Ave. (Westcliff Dr. to 16th St.) 4.3% 4.9% Jamboree Rd. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 54,000 55,000 1,000 1.0% Jamboree Rd. (Birch St. to MacArthur Blvd.) 43,000 46,000 3,000 3,000 Jamboree Rd. (MacArthur Blvd. to Bristol St. North) 51,000 51,000 54,000 54,000 3,000 5.9% 5.8% Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 56,000 57,000 1,000 1.8% Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St. South to Bayview Wy.) 1,000 1.9% Jamboree Rd. (Bayview Wy. to University Dr.) 41,000 45,000 43,000 49,000 4.9% Jamboree Rd. (University Dr. to Bison Ave.) 45,000 49,000 4,000 4,000 8.3% Jamboree Rd. (Bison Ave. to Ford Rd.) 4,000 7.3% Jamboree Rd. (Ford Rd. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 43,000 43,000 48,000 48,000 5,000 11.6% Jamboree Rd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to Santa Barbara Dr.) 42,000, 44,000 2,000 4.8% Jamboree Rd. (Santa Barbara Dr. to Coast Hwy.) 15,000 15,000 0 0.0% Jamboree Rd. ( Coast Hwy. to Bayside Dr.) 33,000 36,000 3,000 9.1% MacArthur Blvd. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 26,000 27,000 1,000 3.8% MacArthur Blvd. (Birch St. to Von Karman Ave.) 32,000 33,0001 1,000 3.1% MacArthur Blvd. (Von Kalman Ave. to Jamboree Rd.) 6-1 1 I TABLE 6-6 (PAGE 3 OF 4) ' SUBAREA MAXIMUM ALTERNATIVE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON [LOCATION ADOPTED (CONSTRAINED) BUILDOUT I FORECAST' CHANGE % CHANGE MacArthur Blvd. (south of Jamboree Rd.) 35,000 36,000 1,000 2.9% MacArthur Blvd. (north of Bison Ave.) 74,000 76,000 2,000 2.7% MacArthur Blvd. (Bison Ave. to Ford Rd.) 74,000 75,000 1,000 1.4% MacArthur Blvd. (Ford Rd. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 60,000 62,000 2,000 3.3% MacArthur Blvd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to San Miguel Rd.) 39,000 40,000 1,000 2.6% MacArthur Blvd. (San Miguel Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 38,000 38,000 0 0.0% Marguerite Ave. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd,) 8,000 7,000 -1,000 -12,5% Marguerite Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 7,000 7,000 0 0.0% Mesa Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 13,000 13,000 0 0.0% Newport•Blvd. (north of Hospital Rd.) 46,000 50,000 4,000 8.7% Newport Blvd. (Hospital Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 54,000 59,000 5,000 9.3% Newport Blvd. (Coast Hwy. to Via Lido) 57,000 64,000 7,000 123% Newport Blvd. (Via Lido to 32nd St.) 41,000 46,000 5,000 12.2% Newport Blvd. (south of 32nd St.) 33,000 38,000 5,000 15.2% Newport Center Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 17,000 20,000 3,000 17.6% Newport Coast Dr. (SR-73 Fwy. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 29,000 30,000 1,000 3A% Newport Coast Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 24,000 24,000 0 0.0% Newport Coast Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 19,000 19,000 0 0.0% Placentia Ave. (north of Superior Ave.) 16,000 18,000 2,000 12.5% Placentia Ave. (Superior Ave. to Hospital Rd.) 11,000 13,000 2,000 18.2% Poppy Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 2,000 0 0.0% Riverside Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) I0,000 12,000 2,000 20.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Jamboree Rd, to Santa Cruz Rd.) 17,000 18,000 1,000 5.9% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Cruz Rd. to Santa Rosa Rd.) 12,000 13,000 1,000 8.3% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Rosa Rd. to MacArthur Blvd,) 26,000 29,000 3,000 l 1.5% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (MacArthur Blvd. to San Miguel Rd.) 22,000 23,000 1,000 4.5% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (San Miguel Rd, to Marguerite Ave.) 24,000 24,000 0 0.0% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Marguerite Ave, to Spyglass Hill Rd.) 19,000 20,000 1,000 5.3% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Spyglass Hill Rd. to Newport Coast Dr.) 19,000 19,000 0 0.0% San Miguel Dr. (north of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% San Miguel Dr. (south of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% San Miguel Dr. (north of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 14,000 15,000 1,000 7. t% San Miguel Dr. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 16,000 18,000 2,000 12.5% San Miguel Dr. (MacArthur Blvd. to Avocado Ave.) 20,000 23,000 3,000 15.0% San Miguel Dr. (west of Avocado Ave.) 11,000 14,000 3,000 27.3% Santa Barbara Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 11,000 15,000 4,000 36.4% Santa Cruz Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 9;000 9,000 0 0.0% Santa Rosa Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 14,000 15,000 1,000 7.1% Santiago Dr. (Tustin Ave, to Irvine Ave,) 6,000 6,000 0 0.0% Santiago Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 4,000 4,000 0 0.0% Spyglass Hill Rd. (San Miguel Dr, to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 4,000 4,000 0 0.0% superior Ave. (north ofPlacentia Ave.) 19,000 20,000 1,000 5.3% Superior Ave. (Placentia Ave, to Hospital Rd.) 28,000 29, 1,000 3.6% Superior Ave. (Hospital Rd, to Coast H 28,000 30,000000 2,000 7.1 % 6-12 TABLE 6-6 (PAGE 4 OF 4) SUBAREA MAXIMUM ALTERNATIVE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COMPARISON ADOPTED BUILDOUT % (CONSTRAINED) FORECAST CHANGE CHANGE LOCATION 3,000 3,000 0 0.0% Tustin Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 3,000 3,000 0 0.0% University Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 15,000 15,000 0 0.0% University Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 10,000 12,000 2,000 20.0% Via Lido (east of Newport Blvd.) 18,000 20,000 2,000 11.1% Von Karman Ave. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 16,000 17,000 1,000 6.3% Von Kaman Ave. (Birch St. to MacArthur Blvd.) 16,000 16,000 Westcliff Dr. (Irvine Ave. to Dover Dr. U.\UcJobs\_01200\01232\Excel\101232-18.xls]T 6-6 �I 6-13 TABLE 6-7 (PAGE 1 OF 4) , SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH LOCATION EXISTING (2001/2002) COUNT BUILDOUT FORECAST GROWTH % GROWTH 16th St. (Irvine Ave. to Dover Dr.) 5,000 6,000 1,000 20.0% 32nd St. (west of Newport Blvd,) 8,000 10,000 2,000 25.0% 32nd St. (east of Newport Blvd.) 3,000 6,000 3,000 100.0% Avocado Ave. (north of San Miguel Dr.) 5,000 6,000 1,000 20.0% Avocado Ave. (south of San Miguel Dr.) 12,000 13,000 1,000 8.3% Avocado Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 11,000 12,000 1,000 9.1% Balboa Blvd. (south of Coast Hwy.) 18,000 23,000 5,000 27.8% Bayside Dr. (south of Coast Hwy.) 10,000 13,000 3,000 30.0% Birch St. (Jamboree Rd. to Von Karmen Ave.) 12,000 21,000 9,000 75.0% Birch St. (Von Kalman Ave, to MacArthur Blvd.) 15,000 22,000 7,000 46.7% Birch St. (west of MacArthur Blvd.) 16,000 22,000 6,000 37.5% Birch St. (north of Bristol St. North) 23X0 29,000 6,000 26.1% Birch St. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 19,000 21,000 2,000 10.5% Birch St. (south of Bristol St. South) 15,000 16,000 1,000 6.7% Bison Ave. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 13,000 18,000 5,000 38.5% Bison Ave. (MacArthur Blvd. to SR 73 Fwy.) 7,000 11,000 4,000 57.1% Bluff Rd. (Coast Hwy. to 15th St.) 0 11,000 11,000 Bluff Rd. (15th St. to 17th St.) 0 11,000 11,000 - Bluff Rd. (17th St to 19th St) 0 11,000 11,000 Bonita Canyon Dr. (east of MacArthur Blvd.) 26,000 34,000 8,000 30.8% Bonita Canyon Dr. (west of SR 73 Fwy.) 17,000 27,000 10,000 58.8% Bristol St. North (west of Campus Dr.) 28,000 33,000 5,000 17.9 % Bristol St. North (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 23,000 29,000 6,000 26.1% Bristol St. North (east of Birch St.) 22,000 28,000 6,000 27.3% Bristol St. North (west of Jamboree Rd.) 16,000 19,000 3,000 18.8% Bristol St. South (west of Campus Dr./Irvine Ave.) 28,000 33,000 5,000 17.9% Bristol St. South (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 17,000 23,000 6,000 35.3% Bristol St. South (east of Birch St.) 16,000 22,000 6,000 37.5% Bristol St. South (west of Jamboree Rd.) 31,000 38,000 7,000 22.6% Campus Dr. (Jamboree Rd, to Von Karman Ave.) 16,000 23,000 7,000 43.8% Campus Dr. (Von Kerman Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 20,000 32,000 12,000 60.0% Campus Dr. (west of MacArthur Blvd.) 26,000 40,000 14,000 53.8% Campus Dr. (north ofBristol St. North) 28,000 39,000 11,000 39.3% Campus Dr. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 30,000 41,000 11,000 36.7% Coast Hwy. (west of Bluff Rd.) 46,000 63,000 17,000 37.0% Coast Hwy. (Bluff Rd. to Superior Ave./Balboa Blvd.) 46,000 64,000 18,000 39.1% Coast Hwy. (Superior Ave. to Newport Blvd.) 28,000 42,000 14,000 50.0% Coast Hwy. (Newport Blvd, to Riverside Ave.) 53,000 73,000 20,000 37.7% Coast Hwy. (Riverside Ave. to Tustin Ave.) 45,000 63,000 18,000 40.0% Coast Hwy. Tustin Ave. to Dover Dr. 42,000 59,000 17,000 1 40.5% 6-14 I I' TABLE 6.7 (PAGE 2 OF 4) SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH EXISTING (200112002) BUILDOUT % COUNT FORECAST GROWTH GROWTH LOCATION Coast Hwy. (Dover Dr. to Bayside Dr.) 63,000 83,000 20,000 31.7% Coast Hwy. (Bayside Dr. to Jamboree Rd.) 51,000 67,000 16,000 31.4% 28.6% Coast Hwy. (Jamboree Rd. to Newport Center Dr.) 42,000 54,000 12,000 Coast Hwy. (Newport e ort Center Dr. to Avocado Ave.) 35,000 44,000 9,000 25.7% Coast Hwy. (Avocado Ave. to MacArthur Blvd.) 36,000 46,000 10,000 27.8% Coast Hwy. (MacArthur Blvd. to Goldenrod Ave.) 40,000 48,000 46,000 8,000 7,000 20.0% 17:9% Coast Hwy. (Goldenrod Ave. to Marguerite Ave.) 39,000 35,000 42,000 7,000 20.0% Coast Hwy. (Marguerite Ave. to Poppy Ave.) 28,000 35,000 7,000 25.0% Coast Hwy. (Poppy Ave. to Newport Coast Dr.) 35,000 45,000 10,000 28.6% Coast Hwy (east of Newport Coast Dr.) 9,000 11,000 2,000 22.2% Dover Dr. (Irvine Ave. to WestcliffDr.) 22,000 25,000 3,000 13.6% Dover Dr. (WestcliffDr. to 16th St.) 25,000 28,000 3,000 12.0% Dover Dr. (16th St. to Cliff Dr.) 29,000 34,000 5,000 17.2% Dover Dr. (Cliff Dr. to Coast Hwy.) Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at University Dr.) 10,000 10,000 0 0.0/0 Eastbluff Dr. (west of Jamboree Rd. at Ford Rd.) 15,000 15,000 0 0.00/0 Ford Rd. (Jamboree Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 9,000 13,000 4,000 44.4% Goldenrod Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 3,000 1,000 50.0% 0.0% Highland Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 2,000 13,000 2,000 22,000 0 9,000 69.2% Hospital Rd. (Placentia Ave. to Newport Blvd.) 7,000 13,000 6,000 85.7% Hospital Rd. (east of Newport Blvd.) 27,000 39,000 12,000 44.4% Irvine Ave. (Bristol St. South to Mesa Dr.) 31,000 42,000 11,000 35.5% Irvine Ave. (Mesa Dr. to University Dr.) 33,000 41,000 8,000 24.2% Irvine Ave. (University Dr. to Santa Isabel Ave.) 29,000 33,000 4,000 13.8% Irvine Ave. (Santa Isabel Ave. to Santiago Dr.) 27,000 33,000 6,000 22.2% Irvine Ave. (Santiago Dr. to Highland Dr.) 27,000 33,000 6,000 22.2°/u Irvine Ave. (Highland Dr. to Dover Dr.) 22,000 30,000 8,000 36.4°/u Irvine Ave. (Dover Dr. to WestcliffDr.) 12,000 14,000 ' 2,000 16.7% Irvine Ave. (Westcliff Dr. to 16th St.) 36,000 49,000 13,000 36.1% Jamboree Rd. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 42,000 55,000 13,000 31.0% Jamboree Rd. (Birch St. to MacArthur Blvd.) 36,000 46,000 10,000 27.8% Jamboree Rd. (MacArthur Blvd, to Bristol St. North) 47,000 54,000 7,000 14.9% Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St. North to Bristol St. South) 47,000 57,000 10,000 21.3% Jamboree Rd. (Bristol St. South to Bayview Wy.) 47,000 57,000 10,000 21.3% Jamboree Rd. (Bayview Wy. to University Dr.) 37,000 43,000 6,000 16.2%' Jamboree Rd. (University Dr. to Bison Ave.) 39,000 49,000 10,000 25.6% Jamboree Rd. (Bison Ave. to Ford Rd.) Jamboree Rd. (Ford Rd. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 46,000 59,000 13,000 28.3% Jamboree Rd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to Santa Barbara Dr.) 34,000 48,000 14,000 41.2% Jamboree Rd. (Santa Barbara Dr. to Coast Hwy.) 32,000 44,000 12,000 37.50/0 Jamboree Rd. ( Coast Hwy. to Bayside Dr.) 12,000 15,000 3,000 25.0% MacArthur Blvd. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 27,000 36,000 9,000 33.3°/u MacArthur Blvd. (Birch St. to Von Kamran Ave.) 22,000 27,000 5,000 22.7% 26.9% MacArthur Blvd. Von Karman Ave. to Jamboree Rd. 26,000 33,000 7,000 6-1 5 TABLE 6-7 (PAGE 3 OF 4) SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH ' LOCATION EXISTING (2001/2002) I COUNT BUILDOUT FORECAST GROWTH % GROWTH MacArthur Blvd. (south of Jamboree Rd.) 27,000 36,000 9,000 33.3% MacArthur Blvd. (north of Bison Ave.) 61,000 76,000 15,000 24.6% MacArthur Blvd. (Bison Ave. to Ford Rd.) 63,000 75,000 12,000 19.0% MacArthur Blvd. (Ford Rd. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 54,000 62,000 8,000 14.8% MacArthur Blvd. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to San Miguel Rd.) 35,000 40,000 5,000 14.3% MacArthur Blvd. (San Miguel Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 31,000 38,000 7,000 22.6% Marguerite Ave. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 7,000 7,000 0 0.0% Marguerite Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 6,000 7,000 1,000 16.7% Mesa Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 12,000 13,000 1,000 8.3% Newport Blvd. (north of Hospital Rd.) 36,000 50,000 14,000 38.9% Newport Blvd. (Hospital Rd. to Coast Hwy.) 43,000 59,000 16,000 37.2% Newport Blvd. (Coast Hwy, to Via Lido) 48,000 64,000 16,000 33.3% Newport Blvd. (Via Lido to 32nd St.) 36,000 46,000 10,000 27.8% Newport Blvd. (south of 32nd St.) 29,000 38,000 9,000 31.0% Newport Center )Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 14,000 20,000 6,000 42.9% Newport Coast Dr. (SR-73 Fwy. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 17,000 30,000 13,000 76.5% Newport Coast Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 15,000 24,000 9,000 60.0% Newport Coast Dr. (north of Coast Hwy.) 12,000 19,000 7,000 58.3% Placentia Ave. (north of Superior Ave.) 12,000 18,000 6,000 50.0% Placentia Ave. (Superior Ave. to Hospital Rd.) 7,000 13,000 6,000 85.7% Poppy Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 2,000 0 0.0% Riverside Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 9,000 12,000 3,000 33.3% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Jamboree Rd, to Santa Cruz Rd.) 16,000 18,000 2,000 12.5% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Cruz Rd. to Santa Rosa Rd.) 11,000 13,000 2,000 18.2% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Santa Rosa Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 21,000 29,000 8,000 38.1% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (MacArthur Blvd. to San Miguel Rd.) 19,000 23,000 4,000 21.1% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (San MiguelRd. to Marguerite Ave.) 18;000 24,000 6,000 33.3% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Marguerite Ave. to Spyglass Hill Rd.) 12,000 20,000 8,000 66.7% San Joaquin Hills Rd. (Spyglass Hill Rd, to Newport Coast Dr.) 12,000 19,000 7,000 58.3% San Miguel Dr. (north of Spyglass Hill Rd.) 7,000 10,000 3,000 42.9% San Miguel Dr. (south of Spyglass Hill Rd) 7,000 10,000 3,000 42.9% San Miguel Dr. (north of San Joaquin Hills Rd,) 12,000 15,000 3,000 25.0% San Miguel Dr. (San Joaquin Hills Rd. to MacArthur Blvd.) 12,000 18,000 6,000 50.0% San Miguel Dr. (MacArthur Blvd. to Avocado Ave.) 19,000 23,000 4,000 21.1% San Miguel Dr. (west of Avocado Ave.) 10,000 14,000 4,000 40.0% Santa Barbara Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 10,000 15,000 5,000 50.0% Santa Cruz Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 8,000 9,000 1,000 12.5% Santa Rosa Dr. (south of San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 11,000 15,000 4,000 36.4% Santiago Dr. (Tustin Ave, to Irvine Ave.) 5,000' 6,000 1,000 20.0% Santiago Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 3,000 4,000 1,000 33.3% Spyglass Hill Rd. (San Miguel Dr. to San Joaquin Hills Rd.) 4,000 4,000 0 0.0% Superior Ave. (north ofPlacentia Ave.) 17,000 20,000 3,000 17.6% Superior Ave. (Placentia Ave. to Hospital Rd.) 22,000 29,000 7,000 31.8% Superior Ave. (Hospital Rd. to Coast H 24,000 30,000 6,000 25.0% 6-16 I I' TABLE 6-7 (PAGE 4 OF 4) SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH EXISTING (2001/2002) BUILDOUT LOCATION COUNT FORECAST GROWTH GROWTH Tustin Ave. (north of Coast Hwy.) 2,000 3,000 1,000 50.0% University Dr. (east of Irvine Ave.) 3,000 3,000 0 0.0% University Dr. (east of Jamboree Rd.) 11,000 15,000 4,000 36.4% Via Lido (east of Newport Blvd.) 8,000 12,000 4,000 50.0010 Von Karman Ave. (Campus Dr. to Birch St.) 14,000 20,000 6,000 42.9% Von Karman Ave. (Birch St. to MacArthur Blvd.) 12,000 17,000 5,000 41.7% Westcliff Dr. Irvine Ave. to Dover Dr. 16,000 16,000 0 0.0% U:\UcJobs\-01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xis]T 6-7 6-17 SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT _ __ . __ VOLUME/CAPACITY (WC) RATIOS 21 / 3 ya OV Q 0.40 ` .94 xassoaa 0.40 020 �•l mm sc 2.50 .97 J! a` +4 mma 0.59 OAI 7cw. A9 ._ 3 0.18 ;Wyart amos1 1.24 LEGEND: 0.88- VOLUME/ CAPACITY RATIO 9.se ° ,Sze / PACIFIC OCEAN NEWPORTREACHGENERALPLANUPDATENe oct Beach Califomia-01232samaxl vcmxd URBAN <nvssnvn s M • Irvine Avenue north of Highland Drive . Irvine Avenue north of Dover Drive . Dover Drive north of Westcliff Drive . Dover Drive north of Coast Highway . Jamboree Road north of Bayview Way . Jamboree Road north of University Drive . Jamboree Road north of Ford Road . Jamboree Road north of San Joaquin Hills Road . Jamboree Road north of Santa Barbara Drive . MacArthur Boulevard north of Bison Avenue . MacArthur Boulevard,north of Ford Road . MacArthur Boulevard north of San Joaquin Hills Road . Newport Coast Drive north of SR 73 Northbound Ramps . Newport Boulevard south of Hospital Road . Jamboree Road south of Birch Street Irvine Avenue south of University Drive . Hospital Road east of Newport Boulevard . Campus Drive east of MacArthur Boulevard • Bristol Street North east of Birch Street Bristol Street South east of Birch Street . Coast Highway east of Dover Drive . Coast Highway east of Bayside Drive . Coast Highway east of Jamboree Road . Coast Highway east of Avocado Avenue . Ford Road east of MacArthur Boulevard . Coast Highway east of MacArthur Boulevard . Coast Highway east of Goldenrod Avenue . Coast Highway east of Marguerite Avenue . Coast Highway east of Poppy Avenue . Coast Highway west of Superior Avenue/Balboa Boulevard �1 1 6.5 • Coast Highway west of Riverside Drive • Bristol Street North west of Campus Drive • Bristol Street South west of Campus Drive • Dover Drive west of Irvine Avenue • Bristol Street South west of Jamboree Road Peak Hour Forecasts The final data required to evaluate the Subarea Maximum General Plan Buildout scenario was intersection volume and geometric data for the 63 intersections selected for analysis. The same intersection configurations have been used as for the currently adopted General Plan Buildout with constrained network intersection capacity utilization values (ICUs). Table 6-8 summarizes the Subarea Maximum General Plan Buildout ICUs based on the AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes and the intersection geometric data as compared with currently adopted General Plan with constrained neetwork ICUs. Appendix "AA" contains the detailed ICU calculation worksheets. The worksheets in Appendix "AA" summarize the intersection geometric data and the AM and PM peak intersection turning movement volumes. A comparison of subarea maximum General Plan Buildout ICUs to existing ICUs is shown on Table 6-9. Table 6-10 summarizes intersection analysis for bui►dout conditions. Deficient intersections are shown on Exhibit 6-C. Intersections with ICU values greater than 0.90 (LOS "E" or worse) in either peak period are: Bluff Road (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM/PM) • Superior Avenue (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM/PM) • Newport Boulevard (NS)/Hospital Road (EW) (AM/PM) • Riverside Drive (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM/PM) 6-20 r I' TABLE 6.8 (PAGE 1 OF 2) SUBAREA MAXIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR CURRENTLY SUBAREA CURRENTLY SUBAREA ADOPTED MAXIMUM ADOPTED MAXIMUM INTERSECTION NSIEW FORECAST FORECAST 'DELTA FORECAST FORECAST DELTA 1. Bluff Rd. &Coast Hw. 1.27 1.28 0.01 1.29 1.28 0.01 2. Su erior Av. & Placentia Av. 0.64 0.72 0.08 0.68 0.83 0.15 3. Superior Av. & Coast Hw. 1.01 1.03 0.02 0.99 1.04 0.05 4. Newport Bl. & Hospital Rd. 0.79 0.93 0.14 0.97 1.18 0.21 5. Newport Bl. & Via Lido 0.54 0.60 0.06 0.46 0.52 0.06 6. Newport Bl. & 32nd St. 0.52 0.57 0.05 0.71 0.81 0.10 7. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. 1:03 1.04 0.01 1.12 1.19 0.07 8. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. 1.02 1.06 0.04 0.85 0.92 0.07 9. MacArthur BI. & Campus Dr. 0.76 0.81 0.05 1.25 1.29 0.04 10. MacArthur BI. & Birch St. 0:71 0.79 0.08 0.80 0.86 0.06 11. Von Karman Av. & Campus Dr. 0.66 0.74 0.08 0.93 1.02 0.09 12. MacArthur Bl. & Von Kerman Av. 0.54 0.52 -0.02 0.64 0.65 0.01 13. Jamboree Rd. & Campus Dr. 0.92 0.98 0.06 1.24 1.25 0.01 14. Jamboree Rd. & Birch St. 0.79 0.87 0.08 0.80 0.81 0.01 15. Campus Dr. & Bristol St. 0.96 1.00 0.04 1.08 1.08 0.00 16. Birch St. & Bristol St. 0.92 0.91 -0.01 0.72 0.72 0.00 17. Campus DrA vine Av. & Bristol St. S 0.93 0.93 0.00 0.77 0.77 0.00 18. Birch St. & Bristol St. Q 0.52 0.53 0.01 0.53 0.54 0.01 19. Irvine Av. & Mesa Dr. 0.68 0.73 0.05 0.90 0.94 0.04 20. Irvine Av. & University Dr. 1.14 1.14 0.00 1.19 1.18 -0.01 21. Irvine Av. & Santiago Dr. 0.70 0.71 0.01 0.78 0.77 -0.01 22. Irvine Av. &Highland Dr. 0.61 0.63 0.02 0.63 0.66 0.03 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 0.78 0.82 0.04 0.70 0.72 0.02 0.82 0.83 0.01 24. Irvine Av. & Westcliff Dr. 0.67 0.70 0.03 0.56 0.59 0.03 25. Dover Dr. & Westcliff Dr. 0.39 0.41 0.02 0.00 26. Dover Dr. & 1Gth St. 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.04 27. Dover Dr. &Coast Hw. 0.86 0.89 0.03 0.90 0.94 0.04 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.83 0.84 0.01 0.94 0.98 0.09 29. MacArthur BI. & Jamboree Rd. 0.96 0.96 0.00 0.99 1.08 0.03 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. 0.70 0.69 -0.01 0.69 0.72 0.64 0.01 31. Ba iew PI. & Bristol St S 0.60 0.61 0.01 0.63 0.02 32. Jamboree Rd. &Bristol St. S 0.96 0.94 0.02 0.85 0.87 0.71 0.01 33. Jamboree Rd. & Ba iew W . 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.70 0.02 34. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr. /Universi Dr. 0.64 0.65 0.01 0.69 0.71 0.62 0.04 35. Jamboree Rd. & Bison Av. 0.51 0.52 0.01 0.58 36. Jamboree Rd. & EastbluffDr./Ford Rd. 0.78 0.81 0.03 0.72 0.76 0.04 0.06 37. Jamboree Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.61 0.64 0.03 0.65 0.71 TABLE 6-8 (PAGE 2 OF 2) ' SUBAREA MAXIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN INTERSECTION NS/EW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR CURRENTLY ADOPTED FORECAST SUBAREA MAXIMUM FORECAST DELTA CURRENTLY ADOPTED FORECAST SUBAREA MAXIMUM FORECAST DELTA 38, Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbara Dr. 0.55 0.69 0.14 0.71 0.87 0.16 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.85 0.88 0.03 0.89 0.91 0.02 40. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.36 0.39 0.03 0.34 0.36 0.02 41. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.39 0.43 0.04 0.71 0.73 0.02 42, Newport Center Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.50 0.55 0.05 0.63 0.66 0.03 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.37 0.43 0.06 0.79 0.84 0.05 45. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.77 0.81 0.04 0.80 0.83 0.03 46, SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.47 0.47 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.00 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 48. MacArthur BI. & Bison Av. 0.78 0.81 0.03 0.80 0.81 0.01 9. MacArttur Bl. & Ford RdJBonita Canyon Dr. 0.77 0.79 0.02 1.06 1.09 0,03 50. MacArthur BI. & San Joaquin Hills Rd, 0.77 0.83 0.06 1.04 1.081 0.04 51. MacArthur 131. & San Miguel Dr. 0.63 0.71 0.081 0.77 0.801 0.03 52. MacArthur BI. & Coast Hw. 0.74 0.74 0.00 0.83 0.81 -0.02 53. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.69 0.72 0.03 0.53 0.54 0.01 54. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Can on Dr. 0.45 0.46 '0.01 0.59 0.60 0.01 55. San Miguel Dr. & Spyglass Hill Rd. 0.30 031 0.01 0.38 0.39 0.01 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd. & San Miguel Dr. 0.521 0.54 0.02 0.68 0.71 0.03 57. Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw. 1.08 1.08 0.00 0.79 0.77 -0.02 58. Marguerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.38 0.39 0.01 0.51 0.53 0.02 59.Maruerite Av. & Coast Hw. 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.91 0.91 0.00 60. Spyglass Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.60 0,62 0.02 0.46 0.50 0.04 61.'POpPyV. &Ccast Hw. 0.67 0.68 0.01 0.76 0.74 .0.02 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Rams 0.54 0.55 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 64. Newport Coast Dr, & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.631 0.66 0,031 0.47 0.51 0.04 65. Newport Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0,57 0.57 0.001 0,601 0.611 0.01 U,.\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\ExceI\[01232-18.x1s]T 6-12 6-22 II TABLE 6.9 (PAGE 1 OF 2) SUBAREA MAXIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING SUBAREA EXISTING SUBAREA INTERSECTION NS/EW COUNT MAXIMUM DELTA COUNT MAXIMUM DELTA ].Bluff Rd. & Coast Hw. DNE' 1.28 N/A DNE 1.28 N/A 2. Superior Av. & Placentia Av. 0.66 0.72 0.06 0.67 0.83 0.16 3. Superior Av. & Coast Hw. 0.84 1.03 0.19 0.90 1.04 0.14 4, Newport BI. & Hos ital Rd. 0.54 0.93 0.39 0.70 1.18 0.48 5. Newport Bl. & Via Lido 0.41 0.60 0.19 0.37 0.52 0.15 6. Ne ortBI. & 32nd St. 0.73 0.57 -0.16 0.78 0.81 0.03 7. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. 0.84 1.04 0.20 0.93 1.19 0.26 8. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. 0.80 1.06 0.26 0.67 0.92 0.25 r Bl. & Campus Dr. 0.61 0.81 0.20 0.85 1.29 0.44 0.79 0.30 0.66 0.86 0.20 ur BI. & Birch St. 0.49 1.02 0.23 man Av. & 'Campus Dr. MMacArthur 0.55 0.74 0.19 0.79 0.65 0.12 ur B1. &Von Karman Av.0.46 0.52 0.06 0.53 1.25 0.40 Rd. & Cam us Dr. 0.70 0.98 0.28 0.85 0.21 .e Rd. & Birch St. 0.61 0.87 0.26 0.60 1.08 1.08 0.14 15. Campus Dr. & Bristol St. 0.77 1.00 0.23 0.94 0.72 0.11 16. Birch St. & Bristol St. 0.66 0.91 0.25 0.61 0.77 0.19 17. Campus Dr./Irvine Av. & Bristol St. S 0.72 0.93 0.21 0.58 0.54 0.10 18. Birch St. & Bristol St. S 0.46 0.53 0.07 0.44 0.94 0.00 19. Irvine Av. & Mesa Dr. 0.70 0.73 0.03 0.94 1.18 0.29 20. Irvine Av. & UniversityDr. 0.82 1.14 0.32 0.89 0.77 0.05 21. Irvine Av. & Santiago Dr. 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.72 0.66 0.06 22. Irvine Av. & Highland Dr. 0.57 0.63 0.06 0.60 0.72 0.08 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 0.72 0.82 0.10 0.64 0.83 0.06 24. Irvine Av. & Westcliff Dr. 0.57 0.70 0.13 0.77 0.59 0.11 25. Dover Dr. & Westcliff Dr. 0.38 0.41 0.03 0.48 0.64 0.07 26. Dover Dr. & 16th St. 0.55 0.64 0.09 0.57 0.94 0.20 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.70 0.89 0.19 0.74 0.98 0.28 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.69 0.84 0.15 0.70 1.08 0.17 29, MacArthur Bl. & Jamboree Rd. 0.88 0.96 0.08 0.91 0.72 0.13 30, Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. 0.55 0.69 0.14 0.59 0.64 0.08 31. Bayview Pl. & Bristol St. S 0.48 0.61 0.13 0.56 0.87 0.15 32. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. Q 0.75 0.94 0.19 0.72 0.71 0.14 33. Jamboree Rd. & BaXyiew W . 0.41 0.48 0.07 0.57 0.71 0.07 34. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr. /Universi Dr. 0.60 0.65 0.05 0.64 0.62 O.I 1 35. Jamboree Rd. & Bison Av. 0.45 0.52 0.07 0.51 0.11 36, Jamboree Rd. & EastbluffDr./Ford Rd. 0.69 0.81 0.12 0.65 0.76 37. Jamboree Rd. & San Joa uin Hills Rd. 0.80 0.64 -0.16 1.00 TABLE 6-9 (PAGE 2 OF 2) SUBAREA MAXIMUM ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) COMPARISON TO EXISTING , , INTERSECTION NS/EW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR , EXISTING COUNT SUBAREA MAXIMUM I DELTA EXISTING COUNT SUBAREA MAXIMUM DELTA 38. Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbara Dr. 0.47 0.69 0.22 0.63 0.87 0.24 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.68 0.88 0.20 0.74 0.91 0.17 40. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.36 0.39 0.03 0.36 0.36 0.00 , 41. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.32 0.43 0.11 0.52 0.73 0.21 ' 42. Newport Center Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.40 0.55 0.15 0.52 0.66 0.14 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.331 0.43 0.10 0.72 0.84 0.12 45. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.58 0.81 0.23 0.661 0.83 0.17 ' 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.31 0.47 0.16 0,37 0.56 0.19 47. SR 73 SB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.26 0.38 0.12 0.17 0.29 0.12 48. MacArthur BI. & Bison Av. 0.63 0.81 0.18 0.60 0.81 0.21 ' 49. MacArhtur BI. & Ford RdJBonita Canyon Dr. 0.71 0.79 0.08 0.90 1.09 0.19 50. MacArthur BI. & San Joaquin Hills Rd, 0.64 0.83 0.19 0.93 1.08 0.15 51. MacArthur BI. & San Miguel Dr. 0.56 0.71 0.15 0.65 0.80 0.15 ' 52. MacArthur BI. & Coast Hw. 0.60 0.74 0.14 6.711 0.81 0.10 53, SR-73 NB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.55 0.72 0.17 0.43 0.54 0.11 54. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.30 0.46 0.16 0.41 0.60 0.19 55. San Miguel Dr. & Spyglass Hill Rd. 0.28 0.31 0.03 0.31 0.39 0.08 ' 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd. & San Miguel Dr. 0.44 0.54 0.10 0.54 0.71 0.17 ' , 57. Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw. 0.99 1.08 0.09 0.69 0:77 0.08 58. Marguerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.31 0.391 0.08 0.35 0.53 0.18 59.Mar erite Av. & Coast Hw. 0.83 0.90 0.07 0.82 0.91 0.09 60. Spyglass Hill Rd, & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.44 0.62 0.18 0.30 0.50 0.20 61. Poppy Av. & Coast Hw. 0.61 0.68 0,07 0.65 0.74 0.09 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Rams 0.45 0.55 0.10 0.31 0.41 0.10 64. Ne ort Coast Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.37 0.66 0.29 0.29 0.51 0.22 65. Newport Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0,47 0.57 0.10 0.50 0.61 0.11 , tDNE = Does Not Exist U:1UcJobs\ 012001012321Excen[01232-18.xls]T 6-9 6-24 ' TABLE 6.10 (PAGE 1 OF 2) SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS/EW 1. Bluff W. & Coast Hw. AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 1.28 LOS IF F 1.28 F 2. Superior Av. & Placentia Av. 0.72 C 0.83 D 3. Superior Av. & Coast Hw. 1.03 F 1.04 F 4. Newport BI. & Hospital Rd. 0.93 E 1.18 F 5. Newport Bl. & Via Lido 0.60 A 0.52 A 6. Newport Bl. & 32nd St. 0.57 A 0.81 D 7. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. 1.04 F 1.19 F 8. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. 1.06 F 0.92 E 9. MacArthur Bl. & Campus Dr. 0.81 D 1.29 F 10. MacArthur Bl. & Birch St. 0.79 C 0.86 D 11, Von Karmen Av. & Campus Dr. 0.74 C 1.02 F 12. MacArthur BI. & Von Karmen Av. 0.52 A 0.65 B 13. Jamboree Rd. & Campus Dr. 0.98 E 1.25 F 14. Jamboree Rd. & Birch St. 0.87 D 0.81 D 15. Campus Dr. & Bristol St. 1.00 E 1.08 F 16. Birch St. & Bristol St. 0.91 E 0.72 C 17. Campus DrArvine Av. & Bristol St. S 0.93 E 0.77 C 18. Birch St. & Bristol St. S 0.53 A 0.54 A 19. Irvine Av. & Mesa Dr. 0.73 C 0.94 E 20. Irvine Av. & University Dr. 1.14 F 1.18 F 21. Irvine Av. & Santiago Dr. 0.71 C 0.77 C 22. Irvine Av. & Highland Dr. 0.63 B 0.66 B 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 0.82 D 0.72 C 24. Irvine Av. & Westcliff Dr. 0.70 B 0.83 D 25. Dover Dr. & Westcliff Dr. 0.41 A 0.59 A 26, Dover Dr. & 16th St. 0.64 B 0.64 B 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.89 D 0.94 E 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.84 D 0.98 E 29. MacArthur Bl. & Jamboree Rd. 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. 0.96 0.69 E B 1.08 0.72 'F C' 31. Bayvicw PI. & Bristol St. S 0.61 B 0.64 B 32, Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. S 0.94 E 0.87 D 33. Jamboree Rd. & Bayview W . 0.48 A 0.71 C 34. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr. /lJniversity Dr. 0.65 B 0.71 C 35. Jamboree Rd. & Bison Av. 0.52 A 0.62 B 36. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr./Ford Rd. 0.81 D 0.76 C 37. Jamboree Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.64 B 0.71 C 6-25 TABLE 6.10 (PAGE 2 OF 2) SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS(EW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 38: Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbara Dr. 0.69 B 0.87 D 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.88 D 0.91 E 40. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.39 A 0.36 A 41. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.43 A 0.73 C 42. Newport Center Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.55 A 0.66 B 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.43 A 0.84 D 45. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.811 D 0.831 D 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.47 A 0.56 A 47, SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.38 A 0.29 A 8. MocArthurBl. & Bison Av. 0.81 D 0.81 D 49. MacArhtur Bl. & Ford Rd./Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.79 C 1.09 F 50. MacArthur El. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.83 D 1.08 F 51. MacArthur Bl. & San Miguel Dr. 0.71 C 0.80 C 52. MacArthur Bl. & Coast Hw. 0.741 C 0.81 D 53. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.72 C 0.54 A 54. SR-73 SB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.46 A 0.60 A 55. San Miguel Dr. & Spyglass Hill Rd. 0.31 A 0.39 A 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd. & San Miguel Dr. 0.54 A 0.71 C 57. Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw. 1.08 F 0.77 C 58. Marguerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.39 A 0.53 A 59.Maz uerite Av. & Coast Hw. 0.901 D 0.91 E 60. Svyglass Hill Rd. & Son Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.62 B 0;50 A 61. Poppy Av. & Coast Hw. 0.68 B 0.741 C 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR 73 NB Rams 0.55 A 0.41 A 64. Newport Coast Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.66 E 0.51 A 65. Newport Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.57 A 0.61 B 'DNE =Does Not Exist U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xls]T 6-10 I 6-26 m m m m m m m m m m EXHIBIT 6-C SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK DEFICIENCIES LEGEND: ♦} F s z ' = AM LOS "E" " 4 , = PM LOS "E" \..' • = LOS "E" �_.,= Pm LOF" ec rv� LOS "F" ` `♦. ; ♦•.� PACIFIC OCEAN -= LOS " URBAN NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY, Newport Beach, California - 01232:42 rev. 050429 • Tustin Avenue (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM/PM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/Campus Drive (EW) (PM) • Von Karman Avenue (NS)/Campus Drive (EW) (PM) • Jamboree Road (NS)/Campus Drive (EW) (AM/PM) • Campus Drive (NS)/Bristol Street North (EW) (AM/PM) • Birch Street (NS)/Bristol' Street North (EW) (AM) • Campus Drive (NS)/Bristol Street South (EW) (AM) Irvine Avenue (NS)/Mesa Drive (EW) (PM) • Irvine Avenue (NS)/University Drive (EW) (AM/PM) • Dover Drive (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (PM) • Bayside Drive (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (PM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/Jamboree Road (EW) (AM/PM) • Jamboree Road (NS)/Bristol Street South (EW) (AM) • Jamboree Road (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (PM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/Ford Road/Bonita Canyon Drive (EW) (PM) • MacArthur Boulevard (NS)/San Joaquin Hills Road (EW) (PM) • Goldenrod Avenue (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (AM) • Marguerite Avenue (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (PM) Intersections experiencing a deficiency for subarea maximum conditions that do not experience a deficiency in the currently adopted General Plan scenario include: • Irvine Avenue (NS)/Mesa Drive (EW) (PM) • Dover Drive (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (PM) • Jamboree Road (NS)/Coast Highway (EW) (PM) Intersection analysis has been performed to determine improvements necessary to provide acceptable levels of service. ICU worksheets are included in M. ' Appendix "BB". Table 6-11 compares the ICU results with and without improvements. Improvements necessary to provide acceptable levels of service are shown in Table 6-12. ' Improvements have been developed that provide acceptable operations at all ' potentially deficient intersections. The feasibility of the necessary improvements is questionable at some locations (particularly where additional through lanes are ' necessary). I I 6-29 I TABLE 6.11 (PAGE 1 OF 2) ' SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) SUMMARY INTERSECTION NS/EW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR FUTURE FORECASTI I WITH IMPROVEMENTS I DELTAI FUTURE FORECASTI I WITH IMPROVEMENTS DELTA 1. Bluff Rd. & Coast Hw. 1.28 0.77 -0.511 1.28 0.88 -0.40 2. Superior Av. & Placentia Av. 0.72 0.72 0.001 0.83 0.83 0.00 3. Superior Av. & Coast Hw. 1.03 0.89 -0.14 1.04 0.89 -0.15 4. Newport Bl. & Hospital Rd. 0.93 0.81 .0.12 1.18 0.90 -0.28 S. Newport Bl. & Via Lido 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 6. Newport Bl. & 32nd St. 0.57 0.57 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.00 7. Riverside Av. & Coast Hw. 1.04 0.73 .0.31 1.19 0.82 -0.37 8. Tustin Av. & Coast Hw. 1.06 0:75 .0.32 0.92 0.75 -0.17 9. MacArthur BI. & Campus Dr. 0.81 0.78 -0.03 1.29 0.82 .0.47 10. MacArthur Bl. & Bitch St. 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.86 0.86 0.00 11. Von Kalman Av. & Campus Dr. 0.74 0.72 -0.02 1.02 0.90 -0.12 12. MacArthur Bl. & Von Karman Av. 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.00 13. Jamboree Rd. & Campus Dr. 0.98 0.89 -0.09 1.25 0.87 -0.38 14. Jamboree Rd. & Birch St. 0.87 0.81 -0.06 0.81 0.81 0.00 15. Campus Dr. & Bristol St. 1.00 0.90 -0.11 1.08 0.85 -0.23 16. Birch St. & Bristol St. 0.91 0.67 -0.24 0.72 0.71 -0.01 17. Cam us'Dr./Irvine Av. & Bristol St. S 0.93 0.87 -0.06 0.77 0.77 0.00 18. Birch St. & Bristol St S 0.53 0.53 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.00 19. Irvine Av. & Mesa Dr. 0.73 0.73 0.00 0.94 0:86 -0.08 20. Irvine Av. & University Dr. 1.14 0.75 -0.39 1.18 0.83 -0.35 21. Irvine Av. & Santiago Dr. 0.71 0.71 0.00 0.77 0.77 0.00 22. Irvine Av. & Highland Dr. 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.66 0.66 0.00 23. Irvine Av. & Dover Dr. 0.82 0.82 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.00 24. Irvine Av. & Westcliff Dr. 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.83 0.83 0.00 25. Dover Dr. & 1Vestcliff Dr. 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.59 0.59 0.00 26. Dover Dr. & 16th SG 0.64 0.64 0.001 0.64 0.64 0.00 27. Dover Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.89 0.89 0.00 0.94 0.85 -0.1 28. Ba side Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.84 0.82 -0.02 0.98 0.78 -0.2 29.MacArthur Bl.&Jamboree Rd. 0.96 0.84 -0.12 1.08 0.90 -0.18 30. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.0 31. Bayview A. & Bristol St. S 0.61 0.61 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.00 32. Jamboree Rd. & Bristol St. S 0.94 0.73 .0.22 0.87 0.80 -0.07 33. Jamboree Rd. & Bayview W . 0.48 0.48 0.001 0.71 0.71 0.00 34. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr. /University Dr. 0.65 0.65 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.0 35. Jamboree Rd. & BiSon Av. 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.00 36. Jamboree Rd. & Eastbluff Dr./Ford Rd. 0.81 0.81 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.00 37, Jamboree Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.711 0.71 0.00 6-30 ' TABLE 6-11 (PAGE 2 OF 2) SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) SUMMARY ' INTERSECTION NS/EW AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR FUTURE FORECAST WITH IMPROVEMENTS DELTA FUTURE FORECAST WITH IMPROVEMENTS DELTA 38. Jamboree Rd. & Santa Barbara Dr. 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.87 0.87 0.00 39. Jamboree Rd. & Coast Hw. 0.88 0.84 -0.04 0.91 0.89 -0.03 40. Santa Cruz Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.00 ' 41. Santa Rosa Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.43 0.43 0.00 0.73 0.73 0.00 42. Newport Center Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.66 0.66 0.00 44. Avocado Av. & San Miguel Dr. 0.431 0.43 0.00 0.84 0.84 0.00 45. Avocado Av. & Coast Hw. 0.81 0.81 0.001 0.831 0.83 0.00 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.47 0.47 0.001 0.56 0.56 0.00 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison Av. 0.38 0.38 0.001 0.29 0.29 0.00 8. MacArthur BI. & Bison Av. '0.81 0.81 0.001 0.81 0.81 0.00 49. MacArhtur BI. & Ford Rd./Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.79 0.76 -0.041 1.09 0.89 .0.20 ' 50, MacArthur BI. & San Joaquin Hills Rd.' 0.83 0.71 -0.121 1.08 0.87 -0.21 51. MacArthur BI. & San Miguel Dr. 0.71 0.71 0.001 0.80 0.80 0.00 12. MacArthur BI. & Coast Hw. 0.74 0.74 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.00 53. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bonita Canyon Dr. 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.00 54. SR-73 SB Rams & Bonita Canyon Dr, 0.46 0.46 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.00 55. San Miguel Dr. & Spyglass Hill Rd. 0.31 0.31 0.00 039 0.39 0.00 56. San Joaquin Hills Rd. & San Miguel Dr. 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.00 57, Goldenrod Av. & Coast Hw. t.08 0.79 -0.29 0.77 0.77 0.00 58. Mar uerite Av. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.53 0.53 0.00 ' 59.Mar uerite Av. & Coast Hw. 0.90 _ 0.90 0.00 0.91 0.79 -0.12 60. Spyglass Hill Rd. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.62 , 0.62 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 61. Poppy Av. & Coast Hw. 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.741 0.74 0.00 ' 62. Newport Coast Dr. & SR-73 NB Rams 0.551 0.55 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 64. Newport Coast Dr. & San Joaquin Hills Rd. 0.66 0.661 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.00 ' 65. Newport Coast Dr. & Coast Hw. 0.57 0.57 0.00 0.611 0.61 0.00 1DNE = Does Not Exist 1 ' ' U:1UcJobsl_012001012321Excell[01232-18.xls]T 6-11 1 6-31 TABLE 6-12 (PAGE 1 OF 2) SUBAREA MAXIMUM ALTERNATIVE ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT Bluff Rd. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Construct 1st SB right turn lane. Restripe through lane to shared through right lane. Change NIS phasing to Split. Construct 2nd EB left turn lane. Construct 4th and 5th EB through lane. Construct 4th WB through lane. Superior Av. (NS) atCoast Hw. (EW) Construct 1 st NB right turn lane. Construct SB free right turn lane. Construct 4th EB through lane. Construct 5th WB through lane. Convert WB defacto to 1st WB right turn lane. Install WB right turn overlap phasing. Newport BI. (NS) at Hospital Rd. (EW) Construct 2nd NB left turn lane. Construct 2nd EB through lane. Restripe 2nd WB through lane to shared through left lane. Change ENV phasing to Split. Riverside Av. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Construct SB free right turn lane. Construct 2nd EB left turn lane. Construct 3rd EB through lane. Construct 4th WB through lane. Eliminate WB right turn lane. Tustin Av. (NS) at -Coast Hw. (EW) Construct 3rd EB through lane. Construct 4th WB through lane. MacArthur Bl. (NS) at Campus Dr. (EW) Construct 2nd NB left turn lane. Construct SB free right turn lane. Von Karman Av. (NS) at Campus Dr. (EW) Construct 1st SB right turn lane. Construct 1st WB right turn lane. Jamboree Rd. (NS) at Campus Dr. (EW) Construct NB free right turn lane. Construct 4th SB through lane. Construct ist SB right turn lane. Construct 3rd EB left turn lane. Construct WB free right turn lane. 1• t M = M M TABLE 6-12 (PAGE 2 OF 2) SUBAREA MAXIMUM ALTERNATIVE ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT Campus Dr. (NS) at Bristol St. N (EW) Construct SB shared through right lane. Construct 5th WB through lane. Construct 1 st WB right turn lane. Birch St. NS) at Bristol St. N EW Construct WB free right turn lane. Campus DrArvine Av. INS) at Bristol St. S (EW- Construct 1st NB ri ht turn lane. Irvine Av. (NS) at Mesa Dr. (EW) Restripe 2nd WB through lane to shared through left lane. Change E/W phasing to Split. Irvine Av. (NS) at University Dr. (EW) Construct 3rd NB through lane. Construct 3rd SB through lane. Restripe 2nd EB through lane to shared through left lane. Change FJW hasing to Split. Dover Dr. (NS at Coast Hw. (EW) Construct 4th WB through lane. Bayside Dr. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Construct 1st NB through lane. Restripe SB through lane to shared through left lane. Convert SB defacto to 1st SB right turn lane. Install SB right turn overlap phasing. Construct 5th WB through lane. Construct 1 st WB right turn lane. MacArthur BI. (NS) at Jamboree Rd. (EW) Construct 4th NB through lane. Construct 4th EB through lane. Construct 3rd WB left turn lane. Jamboree Rd. (NS) at -Bristol St. S (EW) Construct 2nd EB left turn lane. . Jamboree Rd. NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) lCbristruct 1st NB ri ht turn lane. MacArthur BI. (NS) at Ford Rd./Bonita Canyon Dr. (EW) Construct 3rd SB left turn lane. Eliminate SB free right turn lane. Restripe 2nd EB left turn lane to through lane. MacArthur BI. (NS) at San Joaquin Hills Rd. (EW) Construct 4th NB through lane. Construct 3rd EB left turn lane. Goldenrod Av. NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Construct 3rd WB through lane. Elminiate WB defacto right turn lane. Marguerite Av. (NS) at Coast Hw. (EW) Construct 1st NB right turn lane. Construct 3rd EB through lane. Eliminate EB right turn lane. Construct 1st WB right turn lane. U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\Excel\[01232-18.xls]T 6-12 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 6-34 APPENDIX A MIXED USE TRIP GENERATION INFORMATION TRIP GENERATION . An Informational Report 5th Edition . INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS A3 A The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) is a professional society of more than 10,000 transportation engineers and planners who are responsible for the safe aid efficient movement of ' people and goods on streets, highways, and transit systems. Since 1930 the Institute has been providing transportation professionals with ' programs and resources to help them meet those responsibilities. Institute programs and resources include professional development seminars, technical reports, a ' monthly journal, local, regional, and international meetings, and other forums for the exchange of opinions, ideas, techniques, and research. ' 11 11 11 r INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS ' 525 School St., S.W., Suite 410 Washington, D.C. 20024-2729 USA Telephone; 202/554-8050 ' Telex; 467943 ITE WSH CI FAX 202/863-5486 © 1991 Institute of Transportation Engineers. All rights reserved. PAU"110n No, IPr0160 ' IM/AC61191 Ry i V111. Multi -Use Developments/ Quantifying Capture Rates Background A trip generation rate or equation is often used to forecast trips at a proposed development. This rate or equation is generally based on the trip -malting characteristics observed at similar stand-alone existing developments. often a forecast of trips for a.development consisting of several different types of land uses, or a multi- use development, must be made. A common method of developing this forecast is to apply the trip rate or equation for each individual land use in the proposed development and then add the forecasts together. This method does not tape into consideration the fact that some of the trips counted at stand-alone sites are now being made within the multi -use development, either by vehicle or an alternate mode such as walking or transit. Probably the most common example of this trip -making occurs at multi -use developments containing residential and shop- ping areas. Some of the residents work trips and shopping trips are made to the on -site shopping area. Another example is the devel- opment containing offices and a shop- ping/service area. Some of the trips made from the offices to shops, to restaurants, or to banks may be made on -site. These types of trips thus become internal to the multi -use site; they are "captured" on -site. Definitions A capture rate can therefore be generally de- fined as a percentage reduction in traditionally developed trip forecasts to account for trips in- ternal to the site, Depending on the methodol- ogy being used, the reduction may be applied to the total trips forecast or to individual land uses or components of the multi -use develop- ment. It is important to note that these "reduced" trips are applied externally to the site —at entrances, at adjacent intersections, and on adjacent roadways. The reductions to inter- nal site traffic volumes would be appropriate if the internal trips are made by modes other than private vehicles. The trip reduction for captured or internal trips is separate from the reduction for pass -by trips described earlier. These are two distinct phenomena, and both could be appli- cable for a proposed development. Multi -use developments can be classified into two categories. The first consists of a combination of residential and non-residential land uses, and the second consists of a combi- nation of non-residential land uses only. Care - gory I will typically consist of one or more types of residences and a shopping and/or office component. Category II will typically consist of offices and a shopping/retail component, with possibly a hotel or motel. A central business district (downtown) is the ultimate case of a multi -use development. Downtown areas have a mixture of very diverse employment, retail, residential, and commercial recreation/hotel uses. Extensive pedestrian in- teraction occurs because of the scale of the downtown area, the ease of access, and the proximity of the uses. Some downtowns have excellent transit service. Auto occupancy, par- ticularly during peak commuting hours, is usu- ally higher in the CBDthan in the outlying ar- eas. For these reasons, trip generation character- istics in a downtown environment are different from those found in outlying or suburban areas. Accordingly, trip generation characteristic's in this text, and specifically in the care of apture rates at multi -use developments, are app cable to sites outside the downtown. A shopping center is also an example of a multi -use development. However, it has histor- ically been considered as an individual or single land use, and the associated trip generation rates and equations already reflect the "multi- use" nature of the development because of the way shopping center data in this report have been collected. Accordingly, capture rates are not I.41 Trip Generation, January 1991 k` applicable and should not be utilized in the fore- casting of trips for shopping centers. Likewise, a subdivision or planned unit development con- taining general office buildings and support services such as banks, savings and loan institu- tions, restaurants, and service stations arranged in a park- or campus -like atmosphere should be considered as an office park, not as a multi -use development. Similarly, office buildings with support retail or restaurant facilities contained inside the' building should be treated as general office buildings because the trip generation rates and e4tiations already reflect this situation. Finally, it should be noted that the database for Land Use 270, residential planned unit development (PUD), contains sites that are generally only a combination of residential land uses. Accordingly, these trip rates and equations are generally not applicable to a Cat- egory I multi -use development. The PUD data may possibly be used if the non-residential component is an extremely small part of the overall site. Available Data. Very little information is available on quantify- ing capture rates. The information generally consists of interview data where people are asked about their trip -making, actual vehicle trip counts, or a combination of both. Follow- ing is a brief summary of the known database. The Permanent Trip Generation Committee would be very appreciative of receiving any data not reported here. 1. Trip Generation at Special Sites, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, Virginia, VHTRC 84-R23, January 1984. Driveway vehicle counts are available from one multi -use site. The site is located in a densely developed area located in the Northern Virginia suburbs of Washington, D.C., and is served by transit. It contains 606 rental units, 555 of which are located in a high-rise, the remainder being multilevel townhouse units. There are ap- proximately 64,000 square feet of retail/office area, including a delicatessen, a commercial cleaning company office, two building contrac- tor offices, a restaurant, a bank, a hospital consulting firm, a direct -mail advertising firm, a real estate firm, a management consulting firm, and a dentist. Based on applying trip gen- eration equations, the following comparisons were made: TAM =nrlc A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour 9 A.M. 4 - 6 P.M. DaII ITE Calculated 337 764 8 222 6 803 Field Counted 440 0 559 205 27°/, 419 17% Ca ture'd Accordingly, 17% of the daily trips and 27% of the P.M. peak trips were internal to or captured on the site. During the A.M. peak hour the calculated trips were less than the measured trips, which implies there were no internal trips. This finding points out a problem inher- ent in this method of calculating a capture rate. That is, it is assumed in the calculation that the ITE equation is valid for this site. In fact, the ITE equation represents an average of several sites, and appears to understate the A.M. trips at this site. This further suggests that the P.M. and daily ITE calculated trips are understated, which would mean that the aforementioned capture rates are low. 2. The Brandermill PUD Traffic Generation Study, Technical Report, JHIC & Associates, Alexandria, Virginia, June 1984. Brandermill is a large, planned residential de- velopment located approximately 10 miles southwest of Richmond, Virginia. At the time of the study there were approximately 2,300 1.42 A� Institute of Transportation Engineers II r 11 11 11 11 II II II II II II II occupied dwelling units, with 180 townhouse - style condominiums and 2,120 single-family detached units. Commercial development con- sisted of a 82,600-square feet shopping center, a 63,000-square feet business park, a 14,000- square feet medical center, and a 4,400-square feet restaurant. There were also recreational facilities, including a golf course, tennis courts, swimming facilities, and several lakeside recre- ation facilities. Finally, there was a day-care center, a church, an elementary school, and a middle school. The study had the overall goal of deter- mining the on -site (internal) and off -site (external) traffic generation at Brandermill. Data collected included the following: • Automatic machine counts at selected roadways or driveways serving specific land uses, • Manual driveway counts to supplement the machine counts, • Land use inventory, • Travel questionnaire distributed to resi- dences, • Travel questionnaires administered to pa- trons and employees of non-residential land uses, • Turning movement counts at selected lo- cations. Based on the various data collected, the follow- ing comparisons were made: Trip Ends A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour 7 9 A.M. 4 - 6 P.M. Dail Total Generated 2,570 2,935 33 540 External 1,420 1,325 16,280 Captured 1,150 45% 1,610 55% 17,260 51% Thus, 51% of the daily trips, 55% of the P.M. peals hour trips, and 45% of the A.M. peak hour trips were internal to or captured on the site. Additionally, 46% of persons employed in Brandermill also reside in Brandermill. Since the generated trips were actually measured, rather than calculated based on ITE rates or equations, this method eliminates the problem described in the first study. The travel questionnaires provided the following information: Trips Home -Based Trips tions with Origins J, Hours ermill within Brandermill; 7 A.M. to 9 A.M. 50.9% 9 A.M. to 4 P.M. M... 50.2% 4 P.M. to 6 P.M. 34.4% 6 P.M. to 7 A.M. 33.6% Dail 39.1 % Shopping Center Trips with Shopping Center Trips with Origins Destinations Hours within Brandermill within Brandermill' 11 A.M. to 1 P.M. 65% 66% 4 P.M. to 6 P.M. 52% 66% Trip Generation, January 1991 A-7 I-43 11 _V , 3. Trip Generation for Mixed Use Develop- ments, Technical Committee Report, Col- orado -Wyoming Section, Institute of Trans- portation Engineers, January 1986. This study was undertaken to determine how trip generation estimates using ITE rates com- pared to actual driveway counts at multi -use It is noted that some of the sites would be con- sidered a shopping center for trip generation Purpose The results of the study are shown in Tables VIII-1 through VIII-3.The following conclusions were drawn from the results of the driveway count comparison: a. Total daily trip generation for a multi -use site can be accurately estimated using ITE generation rates applied to individ- ual uses within a multi -use development. The 8% difference observed in the study is not statistically significant. (Note: Based on the method of calculating cap- ture rates in the first study, overall 7% of the daily trips were captured.) b, peak hour trip generation for a multi -use site using ITE generation rates applied to individual uses within a multi -use devel- opment may result in an overestimation of an average 2.5%. (Note: This means that for multi -use sites, peak hour trips as a percentage of daily trips is 2,5% lower than that calculated from ITE data. Based on the method in the first study, overall 28% of the A.M. peak hour and developments in Colorado and Wyoming. Also included were interviews that were aimed at de- termining whether persons entering and leaving multi -use sites came there for multiple pur- poses. The nine sites included in the study had the following sizes and land uses: 24% of the p.M. peaic hour trips are a 1 tured.) The following conclusions were drawn from the results of the interviews. a. The percent breakdown by number of purposes for persons entering a multiuse site based on data contained in Tables VIII4 and VIII-2 were determined to be: j U J 7 J u I 7 _1 I`I I IA4 i�$ Institute of Transportation Engineers ' I Table Vlli-1 Number and Percentage of Persons Entering Multi -Use Sites by Number of Purposes (Stops) and Primary Destination wee (Percent) aDestination 1 2 3 or more Total /Savin s and Loan 27 90.0 2 6.6 1 3.4 30 100.0ware Store p 20 66.7 9 30.0 1 3.3 30 100.0rmarket 189 79.1 40 16.7 10 4.2 239 100.0ter 27 93.1 2 6.9 0 0.0 29 100.0eN✓ork Location 48 67.6 22 31.0 1(1.4) 71 100.0 Small Retail Shop, etc. 120 72.7 21 12,7 24 14.6 165 100,0 Restaurant 105 80.8 18 13.8 7 5.4 130 100.0 Health Club 7(100.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 7(100.0) Post Office 19 51.4 12 32.4 6(16.2) 37 100.0 Other 4(100.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 4(100.0) Total (Average) 566 76.3 126 17.0 50(6.7) 742 100.0 Source: Colorado -Wyoming Section, ITE. b. Using the interview data obtained in the study, it was determined that multi -use devel- opments could reduce trip generation of indi- vidual uses within the development by 24% (if all of these uses are present in the proportion noted). Because the 8% difference in driveway volumes in the first part of the study was not statistically significant, it has been concluded that most of the secondary trip purposes indi- cated by interviewees occur because of the availability of multiple retail outlets in close proximity to major primary destinations, such as work locations, supermarkets, banks, restau- rants, hotels, and theaters in multi -use devel- opments. If the secondary destinations were not in close proximity to the primary destinations, trips to the secondary destinations would not occur or would occur at a much lower level. Trip generation for multi -use sites is largely a function of the square footage of primary desti- nation uses cited above. Table V111.2 Number and Percentage of Persons Exiting Multi -Use Sites by Number of Purposes (Stops) and Primary Destination (Percent) Primary Destination 1 2 3+ 1 Total Bank/Savings and Loan 17 73.9 2(8.7) 4(17.4) 1 23 100. Hardware Store 22 88.0 3(12.0) 0(0.0) .25 100.00 Supermarket 39 67.3 10 17.2 9(15.5) `58 100.0 Hotel 4 100.0 0 0.0 0(0.0) 4(100.0) Off iceMork Location 15 71.4 6 28;6 0(0.0) 21 100.0 Small Retail Shop, etc. 82 73.2 1806.1) 12 10.7 112 100.0 Restaurant 100 89.2 11 9.8 1 1.0 112 100.0 Health Club 3(42.8) 4(57.2) 0(0.0 7(100.0) Post Office 20 80.0 3 12.0 2 8.0 25 100,0 Other 2(100.0) 0(0.0) 0 0.0 2(100.0) Total (Average) 304 78.2 57 14.6 28(7.2) 389 100.0 Source: Colorado -Wyoming Section, ITE. Trtp Generation, January 1991 I-45 I Table V111.3 nrFhrawav Cnuntc 1R7fO [IiiaVu v, r me..,M Counted I7EA;M, Counted Counted Counted Counted Counted 1TEA.M. A.M. Pk Pk Hr. of AM, Pk ITEP.M. P.M. Pk Hr. ITE P.M. Pk. Hr. of P.M. Pk. Hr. of fTE Daffy Trips Daily Tdps Pk. Hr. of Generaoo Hr. of Generator Ad], Street of Generator Ad)Sireet AdI.Streef Site (VPD) (VPD) r(VPD) (VPH) (VPH) AN (VPH) (VPH) (VPH 1 7,015 7,910 712 (1112) (7 9) (7 9) (12.1) (4 6) (4 B} 2 5 10578 6,830 952 565 24B 247 1,368 1,806 586 1.038 1,701 -821 3 131661 11,706 1,734 (1112i (7.9} (121) (46) (46) 4 14,815 13,718 1,339 1,136 E!64j_ 1,964 (12 1) 1,460 1(4136' 5 5,388 5,179 445 11,334 9) 682 (12• (4•) (4.6) 6 12,182 13,695 1,219 (1112) 1,043 V-9) 549 625 1,455 1,254 1,185 1,254- (4.5) (11-12) .9) (4.5) 7 27,004 24,462 3,603 2,448 3,639 2,448 (f e) 3,827 2,991 (4.6) 3,785 2,891 (4.5) 8 14,481 18,303 1,575 (76j 1,160 343 551 1,810 1,556 (4.5) 1,334 1,556' (4.5) 9 11,873 7,372 1,162 (11.12) 676 (7.9) 1,479 697 (46 1,200 ;;10(4-5) 7Total 11Q997 109,175 12,741 (1117 9,160 8,520 (7.97 8,162 15,331 1O,8oi 13211 ,074 Source: e:oioraao•wyommg aacaon, - I These numbers refer%25% affee "=cy rate otimucd by Grubb rt Eltb, Much 31, 1965, for the Denver ofra mm et. The data base in the study was used to develop the information in Table V1I14. This table was derived by applying Fourth Edition Trip Gen- eration equations or rates to those sites in the Colorado -Wyoming study that are not'shop- ping centers. The site numbers in Table VIII-4 correspond to the previous site numbers. Table 11111-4 Comparison of ITE Trip Generation with Driveway Counts A.M. PeaK Hour t-& r .M. site No. ITE Counted Ca tuned ITE Counted Ca tured ITE ed 1 323 365 0 640 700 0 61780 3 1,217 855 362 1,491, 821 �0 12,83832 30 /o 45 124,4b;2%�46 4 922 640 282 1,337 1,138 .199 15,11901 31% 5 148 184 0 2,448 1,430 461 4,019 504 2,891 0 8 4 8990 30,408 46 7 3,878 37 /o 282 The following observations were made from the Table VIII-4 comparisons. a. Internal trips et multi -use sites can be significant; however, the capture rate varies considerably. During the A.M. peak the capture rate at the three sites I.46 having internal trips ranged from 30% to 37%, with an average of 33%. The aver- age rate was 29% during the P.M. peak, ranging from 15% to 45%. Finally, on a daily basis the average capture rate was 13%, with a range of 9010 to 20%. AloInstitute of Transportation Engineers b. It is important to again note the problem inherent in calculating a capture rate by this method. However, the two sites that have basically retail and office land uses did not appear to have internal trips. All three sites having internal trips had a ho- tel or motel. 4. Travel Characteristics at Large -Scale Subur- ban Activity Centers, JHK & Associates, NCHRP Project 3-38(2), Report 323, October 1989, The findings of this study are known to be ap- plicable only in major activity centers. The ob- jective of the project was to develop a compre- hensive database on travel characteristics for various types of large-scale, multi -use suburban activity centers. Data were collected at six -sites having the characteristics shown in Table VIII- 5. Data collection activities are shown in Table VIII-6. Following is a summary of findings per- tinent to internal trips for each of the land uses listed. It is noted that "larger centers" refers to the three centers having at least 15 million square feet each, whereas "smaller centers" refers to the remaining three having less than 8 million square feet. Office a. The proportion of employees who made intermediate stops within the activity center on their way to work ranged from 7% to 15%, with an average of 10%. The proportion on the way home from work ranged from 6% to 16%, with an average of 11 %. The percentages were higher at the sites having relatively little retail activity immediately outside their boundaries, and vice -versa. b. The proportion of employees making midday trips internal to the center ranged between 29% and 33% at sites with at least 60% of the work force in professional, technical, managerial, or administrative positions. If the propor- tion in these positions was less than 6001a, the midday trips internal to the center ranged between 20% and 230A. C. The proportion of employees who used on -site facilities ranged as follows for the listed land use: Restaurant 6% to 65% Bank 0% to 43% Health Club 1 % to 8% Travel Services 1 % to 12% Medical Office 1%to5% Table VIII-5 CharantPricticc of fit -woo on* oa..A.. r.:a Office Retail vcv V U JILC, Hotel Residential site GFq GCA No. mlAion Em to ees m1111on Em to ees Rooms DUst DUs2 1 2 4.7 3.5 12,880 3 6,150 1,000 556 N/A 3 17.0 10,465 35,020 4 7 6 865 1 800 1,201 2 300 4 13.0 39 000 2 i3 355 3 100 823 15,b00 5 13.0 32,500 3 3,430 5,150 1 800 9103 206 1,745 206 (2,000) 6 4.0 � Number of dwnn�"e,mue 13,70D �,,,,,e,,,,,, 3 6 155 ie200 2,017 3,000 2 Estimated total dwelling units on site. 3 Number of rooms at surveyed sltes. M Trip,Generarion, January 1991 1-47 d. The proportion of office visitors coming from w in the center ranged from 15% to 59%n the A M. peak period and from 15% to 68% in the P.M. peak. Averages at the smaller centers were 30% in the A.M. and 330/0 in the P.M. For the larger centers these averages were 54% in the A.M. and 58% in the P.M. Retail a. The proportion of trips generated by the retail sites that were internal to the activ- ity centers ranged from. 7% to 68%, with an average of 37%, during the midday peak and from 7% to 57%, with an aver- age of 24%, during the P.M. peak. b. For the larger centers these percentages were 47% during midday and 31% dur- ing the P.M. peak. The smaller centers exhibited percentages of 23% and 14% midday and evening, respectively. Note: These percentages were derived from surveys at seven regional malls ranging in size from 970,000 square feet to 2.2 million square feet. Residential a. The proportion of employed residents who work within the activity center ranged between 13% and W/o. This percentage averaged 31% for owner -oc- cupied units and 28% for rental units. b. For the larger centers 33% of the em- ployed residents worked within the cen- ter. This percentage was 27% for the smaller centers. c, The impact of this relatively high internal trip -making on overall center travel pat- terns was minimal for two reasons. First, the number of units (and therefore the number of potential employees) is rela- tively small compared to the total num- ber of jobs. Second, many of the resi- dential developments attract senior citi- zens and therefore have lower propor- tions of employed residents. Hotel a. The proportion of trips with origins or destinations within the activity center ranged from 13% to 530/0 in the A.M. peak period and from 15% to 46% in the P.M. peak period. b, For the larger centers the average per- centages were 37% in the A.M. and 36% in the P.M. In the morning peak period 29% of the trips entering the hotels originated within the center and 44% of the trips leaving the hotels were destined to locations within the center. In the evening peak period 35% originated from and 36% were destined to locations within the center. c. For the smaller centers the average per- centages were 19% in the A.M. and 27% in the P.M. In the morning peak period 14% of the trips entering the hotels originated within the center and 27% of the trips leaving the hotels were destined to locations within the center. In the evening peak period 33% originated from and 18% were destined to locations within the center. 5. Shared Parking, Barton-Aschman Associates and The Urban Land Institute, 1983. This report contains data on the effect of the captive market. Table VIII-7 summarizes Ex- hibit 23 from that report, indicating the per- centage of employees who were patrons in the same nearby developments. This study reports sharing for parking, not trips. 148 17L Institute of Transportation Engineers , U I, I' r 11 11 11 II II II II II Table V111-7 Effects of Captive Market Same or D Site Type of Develoment Average Ran a Average Range Sin le -Use Site 29 0-76 19 0-78 Mixed -Use Site 61 22-85 28 0-83 All Sites 43 0-85 24 1 0-83 The ULI report also indicated a strong linkage between hotel guests and nearby restaurants or retail uses. In one survey of eight hotels, 73% to 100% of the guests indicated that they were also patrons at nearby retail establishments and/or restaurants. Another survey of six hotels indicated a range of 80% to 90%. It further stated that these results appeared to be consis- tent for both downtown and suburban hotels. 6. State DOT Capture Rate Guidelines Florida has formal guidelines describing factors such as location of the site, market area, and specific combination and amount of land use types. Florida DOT's capture rate guidelines are 2s follows]: Internal capture describes trips that are sat- isfied entirely on -site by using an internal circulation system. Internal trips that must use the external roadway network cannot be considered internally captured trips. 1. Use caution when allowing large num- bers of internal capture for a mixed -use development. A study by the Col- orado/Wyoming Section of ITE, Trip Generation Technical Committee, showed a lack of proof that large mixed - use developments have a significant in- ternal capture rate.2 2. Things to consider when looking at in- ternal capture are as follows: 'Excerpted from "Minimum Guidelines for the Review of Developments of Regional Impact (DRI)," Drift, November 1989. 2"Trip Generation for Mixed Use Developments," ITE Journal, February 1987. Trip Generation, January 1991 A13 a. How remote is this project? b. What is the timing for construction of commercial facilities as compared to the timing for residential construction? c. Can those who work on -site afford to live on -site? d. Office uses may not attract on -site home -based work immediately. e. The commercial land use intended for drug and grocery stores will have larger internal capture percentages than large regional malls. f. What types of establishments off -site are there that will compete with on - site development? g. Is there an internal circulation system ,that enhances or discourages internal trips? h. Is there an internal shuttle system proposed and financially committed to? Conclusions Internal of captured trips can be a significant factor in the travel patterns at multi -use devel- opments; however, very few studies have been conducted to quantify this phenomenon. Be- cause of the very limited data base, it is not rea- sonable to draw conclusions `regarding the specific value of capture rates or allowable re- ductions in trips to account for internal trips. Based on the studies reported in this chapter, however, several general conclusions can be stated: 1. Internal trip making varies according to the combination of land uses. a. Sites having both residential and non- residential components have the most I-49 potential for internal trips, especially during peak periods. b. Sites having only non-residential com- ponents have the least potential for in- ternal peak hour trips; however, the pres- ence of a hotel or motel increases the ' potential. 2. Internal trip making varies by time of day; i.e., the capture rate can be expected to be different during the morning peak, evening peak, midday, and on a daily r baste. The variation can be expected to follow logical trip -making patterns. For i example, there is little trip making be- tween residences and shopping/retail ar- eas during the morning peak hour. On the other hand, there is considerable trip - making between residences and offices ji during both morning and evening peaks. As a final example, there are considerable internal trips made between offices and shopping/retail during the midday, par- ticularly for lunch, i 3. Use of existing ITE trip rates or equa- tions to calculate the base on which to t derive capture rates is inherently incor- - rect. The assumption is made that the 1 individual land uses within the site being studied are "average," and thus the ITE rates.or equations accurately calculate the l individual land use trips. The correct way i� to develop a capture rate is to actually '1 count the individual land use trips and j( compare them with a count of external trips at the site. 4. The specific results reported in NCHRP 323 should probably not be universally applied to all sizes and configurations of multi -use sites. There are relatively few sites being developed and/or reviewed that have the size and configuration characteristics of suburban activity cen- ters (as defined in NCHRP 323). It is not clear whether the findings from such large sites are transferable to the much smaller sites that are much more common. I-50 r'`'4 Data Request for Multi -Use Developments The Institute is very much interested in in- creasing the data base on multi -use develop- ments and would be most appreciative of re- ceiving additional data. Submittal of multi -use development data is described in this chapter. The remainder of this chapter presents information on conducting a study of multi -use developments. Data Collection for Multi -Use Developments A trip generation study of a multi -use site re- quires careful selection and gathering of drive- way volumes for the site, interviews of the users and residents of the site, and the comparison to anticipated trip generation as if the site were a series of discrete, individual, isolated land uses. In selecting a site for a multi -use study, the following criteria should be adhered to., 1. The site should be fully developed. Sites new and only partially developed' may not have reached' a mature state and wodild not nec- essarily generate trips at the rate that a fully de- veloped site would. 2. The driveway serving the site must not serve any other adjacent property. If driveways are shared with another site, it is not possible to separate that traffic destined for the multi -use site, 3. Multi -use developments must meet the criteria described earlier. A great deal of data must be collected to conduct a multi -use trip generation study. A list of these data follows, adapted from the ITE Colorado -Wyoming Section report. Driveway volumes should be gathered for as long a period as possible. Some previous studies have gathered only 24 to 48 hours of data. If these are all that can be obtained, the time period should be during mid -week (Tuesday through Thursday) to avoid daily variations that may occur on Fridays and Mon- days. Ideally, seven consecutive days of data should be gathered, from which daily variations can be computed, and a weekday average and weekend average can also be calculated, Mini- mally, driveway counts should be made during Institute of Transportation Engineers 1 . - • ._ y -. APPENDIX B EXISTING LAND USE Study Area Land Use By NBIM TaZ Analysts Year: 2002 Runld: Try8A Land Use: Try8A Network: ExVa06 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/1312005 Build Time: 12:00:00 PM Modeler. Marne Whiteman BBTMTAZ 1373 1373 land Use Cods 10 23 Units TSF TSF General commercial General Office 1373 1374 26 10 TSF TSF Industrial General Commercial 1374 1374 1375 1375 1375 1376 1376 1376 1377 1377 1377 1378 23 26 10 23 26 10 23 26 10 23 26 10 TSF TSF TSF TSF TSF TSF TSF TSF TSF TSF TSF TSF Geneml,Office Industrial General commercial General Office Industriai General Commercial General Office Industrial General Commercial General Office Industrial General Commercial 1378 23 TSF General Oifice 1378 1379 1380 1381 26 23 23 23 TSF TSF TSF TSF industrial General Office General Office General Office 1382 1383 1384 1384 23 23 10 23 TSF TSF TSF TSF General Office General Office General Commercial General Office 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 7 23 23 10 10 ROOM TSF TSF TSF TSF Hotel General Office General Office General Commercial General Commercial 1389 1390 23 23 TSF TSF General Office General Office 1391 1392 23 10 TSF TSF General Office General Commercial 1392 1393 23 10 TSF TSF General Office General Commercial 1395 7 ROOM Hotel QVBnt" 22.554 57.946 13.094 22.392 57.530 13.000 42.606 83.773 18.931 35.779 91.924 20.772 49.461 127.076 26,716 56.627 145.489 32.876 336.769 152.776 213.637 309.687 202.585 2.2.650 64.556 349.000 164,066 177.534 100.910 60.550 193.450 141.083 93.836 17.780 154.679 58.120 154.000 Ij Ag Paae 1 of 13 Analysis Year. 2002 Reference Number 01232 Runld: Try8A Build Date: 4/13/2005 Land Use: Try8A Build Time: 12:00:00 PM Network., ExVa06 Modeler. Media Whiteman NITM TAZ Lend the Code Daft hindpw QUM w i 1395 10 TSF General Commercial 30.190 1396 23 TSF General Office 591.600 , 1397 23 TSF General Office 165.040 1398 23 TSF General0111ce 82.583 ' 1399 23 TSF General Office 105,519 1400 23 TSF General Office 62.078 1401 24 TSF MedlcallGovt.OfOce 86.096 , 1402 23 TSF General Office 45,794 1403 7 ROOM Hotel 471.000 1403 10 TSF General Commercial 19.700 ' 1403 10 TSF General Commercial 7.100 1403 23 TSF General Office 393.050 ' 1404 23 TSF General Office 434.953 1405 10 TSF General Commercial 128.610 1405 23 TSF General Office 695.157 ' 1406 26 TSF Industrial 381,370 1407 3 DU Apartment 6.000 1407 10 TSF General Commercial 31.720 ' 1407 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 1.560 1407 23 TSF General Office 124.990 1408 1. DU Res -Low (SFD) 144.000 , 1409 7 ROOM Hotel 256.000 1409 10 TSF General Commercial 32.860 ' 1409 13 TSF Restaurant 8.000 1409 1409 23 38 TSF ACRE General Office Park 644.060 1.990 , 1410 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 88.000 1411 10 TSF General Commercial 1.380 1411 40 ACRE Golf Course 15.690 ' 1412 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 58.000 1413 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 33.000 ' 1413 18 TSF Health Club 15.770 1413 23 TSF General Office 138.910 1415 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 153.000 , 1415 36 TSF Church 4.240 1416 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 198,000 1417 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 56.000 , 1418 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 59.000 1419 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 173.000 ' 1420 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 465.000 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 Page 2 of 13 - , II I' Analysis Year: Runld: Land Use: Network 2002 Try8A Try8A ExVa06 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/13/2005 Build 77me: 12:00:00 PM Modeler Marlie Whiteman NRTM TAZ Land Use Coda Units UesoMM 1421 1421 1 2 DU DU Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) 1421 1421 3 10 DU TSF Apartment General Commercial 1421 1421 13 15 TSF TSF Restaurant Fast Food Restaurant 1421 1421 1421 23 24 29 TSF TSF STU General Office Medlcal/GOvt.Ofce Elementary/Pdvate School 1421 1422 1423 1423 32 1 1 37 TSF DU OU TSF Library Res -Low (SFD) Res-Low(SFD) Youth Ctr/Service 1423 38 ACRE Park 1424 1425 3 10 DU TSF Apartment General Commercial 1425 23 TSF General Office 1425 1426 36 1 TSF DU Church Res-Low(SFD) 1426 36 TSF Church 1427 1427 1427 1 10 10 DU TSF TSF Res-Low(SFD) General Commercial General Commercial 1427 1427 1427 23 30 35 TSF STU BEDS General Office Junior/High School Nursing/Conv. Home 1427 36 TSF Church 1427 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 1427 38 ACRE Park 1428 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 1428 3 DU Apartment 1428 1428 1428 7 10 10 ROOM TSF TSF Hotel General Commercial General Commercial 1428 19 CRT Tennis Club 1428 20 SLIP Marina 1428 23 TSF General Office 1428 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 1429 1429 1 2 DU DU Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) 116.000 60.000 352.000 120.400 4.370 3.000 96.020 44.030 636.000 5.240 490.000 266.000 18.230 4.000 1,445.000 1.730 94.870 24A00 118.000 10.150 538.000 5.840 11.360 29.630 2,184.000 68.000 59.680 7.520 0.400 252.000 152.000 124.000 228.560 14.110 1.000 130.000 14.790 22.310 656.000 13.000 II 13, RM 3 of I Analysis Year. 2002 Runid: Try8A Land Use: Try8A Network: ExVa06 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/1312005 Build 77me: 12:00:OD PM Modeler. Media Whiteman MN TAZ Will! lee Code - Wife h orlpum QuEt" 1429 3 DU Apartment 59.000 1429 21 SEAT Theater 90.000 1429 29 STU Elementary/Private School 436.000 1429 37 TSF Youth CO/Service 0•00 1429 38 ACRE Park 3.030 1430 1 DU Res -Law (SFD) 30.000 1430 7 ROOM Hotel 53.000 1430 10 TSF General Commercial 199.000 1430 10 TSF General Commercial 25.170 1430 23 TSF General Office 144.200 1430 33 TSF Post Office 9•900 1431 3 DU Apartment 36.000 1431 10 TSF General Commercial 147.660 1431 10 TSF General Commercial 2.250 1431 23 TSF General Office 77.650 1432 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 280,000 1432 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 104.000 1432 3 DU Apartment 8,000 1432 7 ROOM Hotel 23.000 1432 10 TSF General Commercial 48,700 1432 23 TSF General Office 90.340 1432 24 TSF Medical/Govt.O0ice 7.400 1432 26 TSF Industrial 0.300 1433 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 98.000 1433 3 DU Apartment 125.000 1433 23 TSF General Office 67.160 1433 24 TSF Medical/Govt, Office 22,120 1433 26 TSF Industrial 130.590 1433 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 270.000 1434 23 TSF General Office 6.160 1434 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 7.770 1434 34 BED Hospital 239.000 1435 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 68.000 1435 2 DU Res•Medlum (SFA) 28.000 1435 10 TSF General Commercial 10.800 1435 13 TSF Restaurant 8,400 1435 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 2.700 1436 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 5.000 1436 3 DU Apartment 1,062.000 1436 3 DU Apartment 148.000 11 I Wednesday, April 13, 2005 66 Page 4 of 13 C Analysis Year: 2002 Reference Number: 01232 Runfd: TryBA Build Date: 411312005 Lend UseTryaA Build Time: 12:00:00 PM Network: ExVa06 Modeler.- Marlie Whiteman I' u..w�t�� Inndllea CnrIO tMfR 1436 1436 10 24 TSF TSF General Commercial MedlcatlGovt. office 1436 1436 26 35 TSF BEDS Industrial Nursing/Conv. Home 1436 38 ACRE Park 1437 1438 26 1 TSF DU Industrial Res -Low (SFD) 1438 23 TSF General Office 1438 1438 1439 1439 1439 1439 1439 26 29 1 3 10 23 24 TSF STU DU DU TSF TSF TSF Industrial Elementary/Private School Res -Low (SFD) Apartment General Commercial General Office Medical/GovL Office 1439 1439 1440 1441 26 35 2 1 TSF BEDS DU DU Industrial NursinglConv. Home Res -Medium (SFA) Res -Low (SFD) 1441 3 DU Apartment 1441 1441 1442 1442 6 10 1 2 ROOM TSF DU DU Motel General Commercial Res -Low (SFD) Res-Medlum (SFA) 1442 1443 1443 38 1 2 ACRE DU DU Park Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) 1443 3 DU Apartment 1443 1444 1444 1445 1445 1446 1446 38 1 2 1 2 1 2 ACRE DU DU DU DU DU DU Park Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) Res -Low (SFD) Res-Medlum (SFA) Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) 1446 1447 1447 1448 1448 38 1 2 1 2 ACRE DU DU DU DU Park Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) 3.500 18.000 39.600 169.000 0.170 1.500 2.000 39.900 4.830 622.000 3.000 464.000 50.910 37.410 61.630 503.510 59.000 281.000 462.000 282.000 90.000 35.350 43.000 207.000 6.790 150.000 291.000 54.000 6.500 101.000 420.000 148.000 429.000 188.000 96.000 2.690 134.000 149.000 87.000 68.000 II IN o��o R of 1A Analysis Year. 2002 Runld: Try8A Land Use: Try8A Network: ExVa06 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/13/2005 ' Build Time: 12:00:00 PM Modeler, Media Whiteman t/TM TAZ lmd Lin Cob IMdta Daariptlal 40MI ty, 1448 10 TSF General Commercial 23.800 1448 13 TSF Restaurant 4.950 1448 23 TSF General Office 9.750 1448 24 TSF Medical/Govl.O(Oce 0190 1449 1 DU Res-LoW(SFO) 9.000 1449 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 78.000 1449 10 TSF General Commercial 71.440 1449 23 TSF GeneralOfnca 20.020 1450 1 DU Res -Law (SFD) 2.000 1450 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 55.00D 1450 3 DU Apartment 3.000 1450 6 ROOM Motel 16.000 1450 10 TSF General Commercial 66.640 1450 23 TSF GeneralOOice 35.750 1450 26 TSF Industrial 11,100 1451 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 22.000 1451 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 106.000 1451 3 DU Apartment 6.000 1451 6 ROOM Motel 3.000 1451 7 ROOM Hotel 22,000 1451 10 TSF General Commercial 74.270 1451 23 TSF General Office 3.550 1452 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 12.000 1452 10 TSF General Commercial 129.280 1452 23 TSF General OMce 90.220 1452 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 6.000 1453 10 TSF General Commercial 105.120 1453 21 SEAT Theater 685.000 1453 23 TSF General Office 64.680 1453 36 TSF Church 15.710 1454 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 41.000 1454 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 19.000 1454 10 TSF General Commercial 196.270 1464 11 ACRE Comm.(Recreatlon 0.850 1454 23 TSF General Office 91.320 1454 26 TSF Industrial 47.850 1454 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 4.650 1455 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 3.000 1455 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 164,000 1456 5 DU Mobile Home 251.000 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 912 Page 6 of 13 II Analysis Year: Runid: Land Use: Network: 2002 Try8A Try8A ExVa06 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/13/2005 Build Time: 12:00:00 PM Modeler: MarlieWhiteman OTM TAZ land Use Code Units Description Quant" 9.200 1455 1455 1455 1456 1456 1456 1457 1457 1457 1457 13 23 26 1 2 3 1 2 3 5 TSF TSF TSF DU DU DU DU DU DU DU Restaurant General Office Industrial Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) Apartment Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) Apartment Mobile Home 1.000 38.000 797.000 98.000 26.000 218.000 466.000 85.000 58.000 21.000 1457 1457 1457 6 10 15 ROOM TSF TSF Motel General Commercial Fast Food Restaurant 9.550 1.250 58,000 1457 1457 1457 1457 1457 20 28 29 36 37 SLIP TSF STU TSF TSF Marina Pre-school/Day Care Elementary/Private School Church Youth Ctr/Service 13.440 389.000 10.050 17.400 1.200 1457 1458 1458 1458 1458 38 1 2 3 10 ACRE DU DU DU TSF Park Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) Apartment General Commercial 567.000 552.000 109.000 17.370 14.000 1458 1458 20 23 SLIP TSF Marina General Office 12.000 4.800 1458 32 TSF Library 2.000 1458 1459 1459 1459 1459 1459 1459 1459 36 1 2 3 7 10 10 11 TSF DU DU DU ROOM TSF TSF ACRE Church Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) Apartment Hotel General Commercial General Commercial Comm./Recreation 10.000 62.000 69.000 34.000 0.500 185.490 4.250 440.000 1459 1459 1459 1459 1460 1460 21 23 33 37 1 2 SEAT TSF TSF TSF DU DU Theater General Office Post Office Youth CV/Service Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) 10.920 1.700 4.970 674.000 48.000 Page 7 of 13 Wednesday. April 13. 2005 69 Analysis Year: 2002 Runld., Try8A Land Use: Try8A Network., EXV206 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/13/2005 Build Time., 12:00:00 PM Modeler. Madle Whiteman WITMtAZ MUM Code Mats QUM* 1460 3 DU Apartment 87.000 1460 19 CRT Tennis Club 2.000 1460 38 ACRE Park 0,830 1461 1 OU Res -Low (SFD) 214.000 1461 2 DU Res-Medldm (SFA) 263.000 1461 10 TSF General Commercial 4.990 1461 13 TSF Restaurant 20.000 1461 17 TSF Yacht Club 8.290 1461 20 SLIP Marina 352.000 1461 23 TSF General Office 12.000 1461 26 TSF industrial 5.040 1461 38 ACRE Park 0.780 1462 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 32.000 1463 3 DU Apartment 520.000 1463 10 TSF General Commercial 67.550 1463 13 TSF Restaurant 21.550 1463 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 17.420 1464 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 995.000 1464 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 1,201.000 1464 6 ROOM Motel 4.000 1464 10 TSF General Commercial 65.620 1464 13 TSF Restaurant 16,550 1464 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 5.430 1464 23 TSF General Office 18.370 1464 24 TSF Medical/Govt.Office 2.760 1464 33 TSF Post Omce 1.900 1464 36 TSF Church 3.000 1464 38 ACRE Park 1.620 1465 5 DU Mobile Home 291.000 1465 20 SLIP Marina 218.000 1466 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 147.000 1466 7 ROOM Hotel 410.000 1466 19 CRT Tennis Club 16.000 1466 22 ACRE Newport Dunes 64.000 1466 37 TSF Youth C1dService 2.690 1466 40 ACRE Golf Course 9.000 1467 3 DU Apartment 1,185.000 1468 29 STU Elementary/Pdvate School 320.000 1469 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 792.000 1469 3 DU Apartment 225.000 Wednesday, Apol 13, 2005 B 1p Page 8 of 13 Analysis Year: Runld.• Land Use: Network., 2002 Try8A Try8A ExV206 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date:4/13/2005 Build Time: 12:00:00 PM Modeler. Marlie Whiteman NBTM TAZ 1469 1469 1469 Land Use Coda 28 29 30 Ufl is TSF STU STU Degamption Pre-school/Day Care Elementary/Private School JuniodHigh School Quantity .0 294.000 1,829.00 29.700 1469 1469 36 37 TSF TSF Church Youth Ctr/Service 3.0 8 .00 0 1469 1470 1470 38 2 10 ACRE DU TSF Park Res -Medium (SFA) General Commercial 172.00 72.100 1.0 1470 19 CRT Tennis Club 11.66660 1470 1471 23 1 TSF DU General Office Res-Low(SFD) 462 .000 2.000 1471 1472 38 16 ACRE TSF Park l Auto DealedSaes 190.000 .000 1473 1474 1474 3 1 2 DU DU DU Apartment Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) 8.000 208.000 736 .000 1474 1474 3 10 DU TSF Apartment General Commercial 35. 0 6.350 1474 13 TSF Restaurant 14.000 1474 38 ACRE Park 81.730 1475 1475 1475 25 27 29 TSF TSF STU R & D Mini-Storage/Warehouse Elementary/Private School .0 133.940 1475 33 TSF Post Office 60.20 60.280 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1479 148D 36 2 1 2 1 2 2 TSF DU DU DU DU DU DU Church Res -Medium (SFA) Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) Res-Low(SFD) Res-Medlum (SFA) Res -Medium (SFA) .000 339.000 50.000 14.000 5 .000 1 .000 80 .000 1480 1481 1481 1481 3 1 2 10 DU DU DU TSF Apartment Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) General Commercial 101,000 182.000 1.0 2.040 1481 1482 1482 38 1 2 ACRE DU DU Park Res -Low (SFD) Res-Medlum (SFA) 142.00 43.000 00 1482 3 DU Apartment 81.2 1.00 1482 40 ACRE Golf Course Pane 9 of 13 I Analysts Year., 2002 Runld: Try8A Land Use: Try8A Network: ExVa06 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/13/2005 Build 77me: 12:00:00 PM - Modeler Media Whiteman M TAI Und W8 CM NU ka"Pu QBWY 1483 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 21,000 1484 7 ROOM Hotel 325,000 1484 10 TSF General Commercial 21.700 1484 23 TSF General Office 960.000 1485 9 TSF Regional Commercial 1,259.000 1485 21 SEAT Theater 1,700.000 1486 3 DU Apartment 245,000 1486 10 TSF General Commercial 116.970 1486 10 TSF General Commercial 8.710 1486 23 TSF General Office 846290 1486 31 TSF CulturaULeaming Center 35.000 1487 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 69.000 1487 7 ROOM Hotel 600.000 1487 10 TSF General Commercial 7.500 1487 19 CRT Tennis Club 22.000 1487 23 TSF General Office 11.630 1487 40 ACRE Golf Course 99.440 1488 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 122.000 1489 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 228.000 1489 10 TSF General Commercial 4.800 1490 23 TSF General Office 115.800 1491 23 TSF General Office 468.640 1491 24 TSF Medical/Govt. Office 351.950 1492 10 TSF General Commercial 16.970 1492 10 TSF General Commercial 16.130 1492 21 SEAT Theater 2,074.000 1492 23 TSF General Office 438260 1493 23 TSF General Office 409.510 1494 10 TSF General Commercial 104.540 1494 32 TSF Library 65.000 1495 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 416.000 1495 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 27.000 1495 10 TSF General Commercial 2,830 1495 17 TSF Yacht Club 43.640 1495 20 SLIP Marine 283.000 1495 23 TSF General Office 186,530 1495 38 ACRE Park 6.530 1496 1 DU Res-LoW (SFD) 73.000 1496 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 208.000 1496 3 DU Apartment 78,000 I Wednesday, April 13, 2005 611 Page 10 of 13 I U Analysis Year. 2002 Runld: Try8A Land Use: Try8A Network: ExVa06 mw�l�! lend llao Calla (f1�8 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/13/2005 Build Time: 12:00:00 PM Modeler. Marlie Whiteman ralm am 1498 1497 1497 1497 1498 1498 1498 1498 .....---- ____- 29 1 2 3 1 3 10 23 STU DU DU DU DU DU TSF TSF Elementary/Private School Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) Apartment Res -Low (SFD) Apartment General Commercial General Office 1498 1499 1500 38 1 1 ACRE DU DU Park Res -Low (SFD) Res -Low (SFD) 1500 1501 1501 1501 38 1 3 10 ACRE DU DU TSF Park Res-Low(SFD) Apartment General Commercial 1501 1501 21 23 SEAT TSF Theater General Office 1501 1502 1502 1502 1502 1503 1503 1503 1503 1504 1504 1504 1504 38 1 3 10 23 1 10 10 23 1 10 10 23 ACRE DU DU TSF TSF DU TSF TSF TSF DU TSF TSF TSF Park Res -Low (SFD) Apartment General Commercial General Office Res -Low (SFD) General Commercial General Commercial General Office Res -Low (SFD) General Commercial General Commercial General Office 1504 1505 1505 1505 36 1 10 23 TSF DU TSF TSF Church Res -Low (SFD) General Commercial General Office 1505 1505 1506 1506 1507 32 33 1 3 1 TSF TSF DU DU DU Library Post Office Res -Low (SFD) Apartment Res -Low (SFD) 1607 38 ACRE Park 11.630 143.000 214.000 48.000 278.000 48.000 55.680 7.290 3.590 139.00D 178.000 1.030 747.000 7.000 87.890 500.000 22.750 2.500 156.000 1.000 86.570 20.910 45.000 46.430 0.645 3.027 487.000 1.075 77.382 5.044 12.340 775.000 51.170 25.900 3.800 5.000 255.000 14.000 141.000 0.780 I r3Is Pace 11 of 13 Analysis Year. Runld: Land Use: Netwonk., 2002 Try8A Try8A ExVa06 Reference Number 01232 Build hate: 4113/2005 Build Time: 12:00:00 PM Modeler. Media Whiteman N{TM TAZ M he C* Uf N ftmroft QuenUty 1508 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 228.000 1508 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 120.000 ' 1508 3 DU Apartment 8.000 1508 29 STU Elementary/Private School 762.000 1508 37 TSF Youth Cu/Service 5.850 1510 1511 1 1 DU DU Res -Law (SFD) Res -Low (SFD) 200.000 20.000 ' 1511 10 TSF General Commercial 57.060 1512 2 DU Res-Medium.(SFA) 246.000 1513 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 348.000 ' 1513 4 DU Elderly Residential 100.000 1513 18 TSF Health Club 1.000 ' 1513 37 TSF Youth CV/Service 24,070 1514 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 41.000 1515 3 DU Apartment 388.000 , 1515 28 TSF Pre schoollDay Care 8.400 1516 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 67.000 1516 4 DU Elderly Residential 100.000 ' 1516 36 TSF Church 88.670 1517 3 DU Apartment 160.000 , 1517 10 TSF General Commercial 68,970 1517 23 TSF GeneralOHlce 9.750 1517 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 13.390 ' 1517 29 STU Elementary/Pdvate School 396.000 1517 30 STU JuniorlHigh School 780.000 1517 36 TSF Church 31.830 1518 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 439.000 1618 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 67.000 1518 38 ACRE Park 0.950 ' 1519 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 467.000 1519 38 ACRE Park 14.320 , 1520 1 DU Res-LoW (SFD) 207.000 1521 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 580.000 1521 29 STU Elementary/Private School 498.000 ' 1521 38 ACRE Park 9.730 1522 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 119,000 1522 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 120.000 ' 1522 10 TSF General Commercial 72.850 1522 23 TSF General Office 12.900 1525 3 DU Apartment 702.000 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 BILL Page 12 of 13 , Analysis Year: ' Runld: Land Use: Network: ' IBTM TAZ ' 1526 1527 1528 ' 1528 1558 1 118618 1713 ' 1714 1715 1715 1716 1716 ' Wednesd 2002 Reference Number. 01232 Try8A Build Date: 4/13/2005 Try8A Build Time: 12:00:00 PM ExVa06 Modeler. Media Whiteman t....11ien rndn 1111t1➢ 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 38 ACRE Park 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 36 TSF Church 3 DU Apartment 3 DU Apartment 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 34 BED Hospital 2 DU Res-Medwm,(SFA) 10 TSF General Commercial 24 TSF Medical/Govt.Ofce 24 TSF Medical/Govt.Of0ce 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 179.000 18.500 6.370 26.010 7.000 7.000 6.000 112.000 673.000 17.760 100.580 100.580 95.000 EXHIBIT C PROPOSED NBTM TAZ STRUCTURE FOR HOAG HOSPITAL 0 ,"part Beach, Califomia - 02694:03 URBAN I k u 1 1 k 1_ .J APPENDIX C ' CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE u 1 F p 1 Study Area Land Use By NBTM Taz Reference Number: 01232 Analysts Year: 2040 Build Date: 4/1212005 Runld: BO06 Build Time: 8:00:00 PM ' Land Use: GPA01 Modeler: Marlie Whiteman Network: B006 ' NBTMTAZ 1373 1373 1373 1373 1373 1374 ' 1374 1374 1374 ' 1374 1375 1375 ' 1375 1375 ' 1375 1375 1376 1376 1376 1376 1376 1377 ' 1377 1377 1377 1377 1378 1378 ' 1378 1378 137 1379 1380 ' 1381 1382 1383 1384 r wnd llnn PrAo IMRR ._.._ _10 ---- TSF ' General Commercial 23 TSF General Office 24 TSF Medical Office 25 TSF R & D 26 TSF Industrial 10 TSF General Commercial 23 TSF General Office 24 TSF Medical Office 25 TSF R&D 26 TSF Industrial 10 TSF General Commercial 13 TSF Restaurant 23 TSF General Office 24 TSF Medical Office 25 TSF R & D 26 TSF Industrial 10 TSF General Commercial 23 TSF General Office 24 TSF Medical Office 25 TSF R & D 26 TSF Industrial 10 TSF General Commercial 23 TSF General Office 24 TSF Medical Office 25 TSF R & D 26 TSF Industrial 10 TSF General Commercial 23 TSF General Office 24 TSF Medical Office 25 TSF R&D 26 TSF Industrial P3 TSF General Office 23 TSF General Office 23 TSF General Office 23 TSF General Office 23 TSF General Office 10 TSF General Commercial 35.080 78.130 0.000 0.000 12.190 35.080 78.130 0.000 0.000 12.190 54.460 0.000 117.200 0.000 0.000 18.290 56.130 125,010 0.000 0.000 19.510 80.680 179.700 0.000 0.000 28.050 91.210 203.140 0.000 0.000 31.700 349.640 158.610 221.800 321.530 210.330 25.250 Wednes C3 Analysis Year. 2040 Runld: BOOS Land Use: GPA01 Network., BO06 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/12/2005 Build 71me; 8:00:00 PM Modeler: Marile Whiteman (ATM TAZ Lid Uee Code NU UeecripUon MIRMY 1384 23 TSF General Office 67.020 1385 7 ROOM Hotel 349.000 1386 23 TSF General Office 226.210 1387 23 TSF General Office 184.320 1388 10 TSF General Commercial 106.110 1388 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1389 10 TSF General Commercial 46.300 1389 23 TSF General Office 201.780 1390 23 TSF General Office 146.480 1391 23 TSF General Office 97.420 1392 10 TSF General Commercial 17.780 1392 23 TSF General Office 160.690 1393 10 TSF General Commercial 58.120 1395 7 ROOM Hotel 164.000 1395 10 TSF General Commercial 120.000 1395 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1396 23 TSF General Office 591.600 1397 23 TSF General Office 165,040 1398 23 TSF General Office 82.583 1399 23 TSF General Office 108,620 1400 23 TSF General Office 62.080 U01 24 TSF Medical Office 86.096 1402 23 TSF General Office 45.794 1403 7 ROOM Hotel 471.000 1403 10 TSF General Commercial 16.000 1403 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1403 23 TSF General Office 393.050 1403 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 10.900 1404 23 TSF General Office 434.953 1405 10 TSF General Commercial 129.300 1405 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1405 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1405 23 TSF General Office 688.160 1406 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1408 26 TSF industrial 430.000 1407 10 TSF General Commercial 31.720 1407 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 1.560 1407 23 TSF General Office 124.990 1407 24 TSF Medical Office 3.770 1408 1 DU Res•Low(SFD) 145.000 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 r Page 2 of 15 2040 Reference Number: 01232 Analysis Year. Build Date: 4/1021205 Runld: 8006 Build Time: 8:00:00 PM Land Use: GPA01 Modeler. Marlie Whiteman Network: BO06 Quantity NDTM TAZ land Use Cods Units Description 300.000 1409 7 ROOM Hotel 35.000 1409 10 TSF General Commercial 8.000 1409 13 TSF Restaurant 660.000 1409 23 TSF General Office 3.330 1409 38 ACRE Park 88.000 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 1410 2 1.380 1411 10 TSF General Commercial , 15.690 1411 40 ACRE Golf Course 60.000 1412 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 33.000 1413 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 60.330 1413 18 TSF Health Club 67.950 1413 23 TSF General Office 45.910 1413 39 ACRE Regional Park 153.000 1415 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 8.730 1415 36 TSF Church 198.000 1416 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 56.000 1417 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 59.000 1418 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 173.000 1419 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 465.000 1420 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 116.000 1421 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 60.000 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 1421 2 352.000 1421 3 DU Apartment 174.800 1421 10 TSF General Commercial 4.370 1421 13 TSF Restaurant 3.000 1421 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 214.660 1421 23 TSF General Office 43.220 1421 24 TSF Medical Office 636.000 STU Elementary/Private School 1421 29 5240 1421 32 TSF Library 490.000 1422 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 266.000 1423 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 18.230 1423 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 4.000 1423 38 ACRE Park 1,445.000 1424 3 DU Apartment 1.730 1425 10 TSF General Commercial 128.610 1425 23 TSF General Office 24.100 1425 36 TSF Church 119.000 1426 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 40,000 1426 36 TSF Church Page 3 of 15 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 CS Analysts Year. 2040 Runid: BO06 Land Use: GPA01 Network: 8006 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/12/2005 Build Time: 8:00:00 PM Modeler. Marne Whiteman IMTM TAZ lima UM Cade NO MOM Qo11tUtU 1427 1 DU• Res-Low(SFD) 550.000 1427 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1427 10 TSF General Commercial 21.390 1427 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1427 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 0.000 1427 23 TSF General Office 29.630 1427 24 TSF MedicalOfBoe 0.000 1427 30 STU Junior/lilgh School 2,164.000 1427 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 68.000 1427 36 TSF Church 59,680 1427 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 13.370 1427 38 ACRE Park 0.400 1428 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 257.000 1428 3 DU Apartment 152.000 1428 7 ROOM Hotel 140.000 1428 10 TSF General Commercial 332.520 1428 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1428 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1428 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 0.000 1428 19 CRT Tennis Club 0.000 1428 20 SLIP Marine 130.000 1428 23 TSF General Office 75.090 1428 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1428 37 TSF Youth Cir/Service 22.310 1429 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 656,000 1429 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 13.000 1429 3 DU Apartment 59.000 1429 21 SEAT Theater 90.000 1429 29 STU ElementarylPdvale School 436.000 1429 37 TSF You01 Ctr/Service 0.900 1429 36 ACRE Park 3.030 1430 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 30.000 1430 6 ROOM Motel 0.000 1430 7 ROOM Hotel 64.000 1430 10 TSF General Commercial 275.980 1430 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1430 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1430 16 TSF Auto DealedSoles 0.000 1430 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1430 23 TSF General Office 283.820 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 C/ _ Page 4 of15 ' Analysis Year. Runld: Land Use: Network: NRIM TAZ 1430 ' 1431 1431 ' 1431 1431 1431 1432 1432 1432 ' 1432 1432 ' 1432 1432 1432 ' 1432 1433 1433 ' 1433 1433 1433 1433 1433 t 1434 1434 1434 ' 1435 1435 1435 ' 1435 1435 1436 1436 1436 1436 1436 1436 ' 1436 1436 ' 143 1438 ' Wednes 2040 Reference Number: 01232 B006 Build Date: 4/12/2005 GPA01 Build Time: 8:00:00 PM B006 Modeler. Madle Whiteman r..ea Ilse rado llnffg 33 TSF Post Office 3 DU Apartment 10 TSF General Commercial 13 TSF Restaurant 17 TSF Yacht Club 23 TSF General Office 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 3 DU Apartment 6 ROOM Motel 7 ROOM Hotel 10 TSF General Commercial 13 TSF Restaurant 23 TSF General Office 24 TSF Medical Office 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 3 DU Apartment 23 TSF General Office 24 TSF Medical Office 26 TSF Industrial 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 23 TSF General Office 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 34 BED Hospital 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 10 TSF General Commercial 13 TSF Restaurant 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 3 DU Apartment 4 DU Elderly Residential 10 TSF General Commercial 24 TSF Medical Office 26 TSF Industrial 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 38 ACRE Park 26 TSF Industrial 23 TSF General Office C-7 9.900 36.000 149.910 0.000 0.000 77.650 205.000 379.000 8.000 0.000 53.000 66,380 0.000 135.730 11.290 98.000 0.000 142.000 67.160 24.460 298.120 270.000 9.660 7.770 822.000 68.000 28.000 10.800 8.400 2.700 0.000 1,370.000 0.000 3.500 39.600 48.002 169.000 0.170 5.000 57.400 Pace 5 of 15 Analysis Year. 2040 Runld.• BOOB Land Use: GPA01 Network 8006 Reference Number 01232 Build Date: 4H212005 Build 77me: 8:00:00 PM Modeler. Marne Whiteman NTMTAZ [AndUee Code Uldle kumpum QUIRMY 1438 26 TSF Industrial 8.330 1438 27 TSF Mini-StorageNVarehouse 0.000 1438 29 STU ElementarylPdvate School 622.000 1439 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1439 3 DU Apartment 464.000 1439 5 DU Mobile Home 0.000 1439 10 TSF General Commercial 50.910 1439 23 TSF GeneralOftice 239,510 1439 24 TSF MedicalOf0ce 61.630 1439 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1439 26 TSF Industrial 837.270 1439 35 BEDS NUrsinglConv. Home 59.000 1440 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 281.000 1441 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 462:000 1441 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1441 3 DU Apartment 293.000 1441 6 ROOM Motel 90.000 1441 10 TSF General Commercial 50,030 1441 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1441 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1442 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 43,000 1442 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 214.000 1442 38 ACRE Park 6.790 1443 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 125.000 1443 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 350.000 1443 3 DU Apartment 64.000 1443 38 ACRE Park 6.500 1444' 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 94,000 1444 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 498.500 1445 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 139.000 1445 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 509.000 1446 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 124.000 1446 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 239.000 1446 38 ACRE Park 2.690 1447 1 DU Res-Low(SFD)* 88.000 1447 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 415.000 1448 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 87.000 1446 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 103.000 we 10 TSF General Commercial 26.170 1448 13 TSF Restaurant 2.240 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 r^"?, Page 6 of 15 ' 2040 Reference Number. 01232 Analysis Year. Build Date: 4/1212005 Runld: Land Use: BO06 GPA01 Build Time: 8:00:00 PM Modeler., Marlie Whiteman Network: BO06 4uenUtYip 0escrum NOWiAZ Lend Use Code Untts 12.190 1,g 23 TSF General Office 0,990 ' 1448 24 TSF Medical Office 95.000 1449 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 74.900 1449 10 TSF General Commercial 0.000 ' 1449 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1449 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 20.020 1449 23 TSF General Office 159.000 1450 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 3.000 1450 3 DU Apartment 16.000 ' 1450 6 ROOM Motel 67.590 1450 10 TSF General Commercial 0.000 1450 13 TSF Restaurant 35.750 1450 23 TSF l Office 22.000 1451 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 110.000 1451 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 5.000 1451 3 DU Apartment 3.000 1451 6 ROOM Motel 22.000 1451 7 ROOM Hotel Commercial 82.750 1451 10 TSF General 0.000 1451 13 TSF Restaurant .000 1451 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 8.000 1451 23 TSF General Office 12.000 1452 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 130.510 ' 1452 10 TSF General commercial 0.000 1452 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1452 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 90220 1452 23 TSF General Office 6.000 1452 37 TSF Youth Cr/Service 111.0 ' 1453 10 TSF General Commercial 0.00000 1453 13 TSF Restaurant 685.000 1453 21 SEAT Theater 119.900 ' 1453 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1453 24 TSF Medical Office 26.010 1453 36 TSF Church 41.000 ' 1454 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 172.000 Du Res -Medium (SFA) 1454 2 201.780 1454 10 TSF General Commercial 0.850 1454 11 ACRE Comm./Recreaoon 0.000 II' 1454 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 1454 Page 7 of 15 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 C9 Analysts Year. 2040 Runld: B006 Land Use: GPA01 Network: 0006 Reference Number 01232 Build Date: 4/12/2005 Bgfld lime: 8:00:00 PM Modeler, Media Whiteman WM TAZ Lill UN CM MM plotUlm QuEt" 1454 23 TSF GeneralOHlce 101.500 1464 37 TSF Youth Ctr/SerAoe 4.650 1455 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 3.000 1455 2 DU Res-Medlum (SPA) Ono 1455 10 TSF General Commercial 108.220 1455 13 TSF Restaurant 9.200 1455 23 TSF GeneralOfOce 1.000 1455 26 TSF Industrial 38.000 1456 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 1,040.000 1456 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 102.000 1456 3 DU Apartment 26.000 1457 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 218.000 1457 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 476.000 1457 3 DU Apartment 103.000 1457 5 DU Mobile Home 58.0D0 1457 6 ROOM Motel 26,000 1457 10 TSF General Commercial 12.540 1457 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 1.250 1457 20 SLIP Marina 58.000 1457 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 13.440 1457 29 STU Elementary/Private School 389.000 1457 36 TSF Church 10.050 1457 37 TSF Youth Cb/Service 17.400 1467 38 ACRE Park 1.200 1458 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 366.000 1458 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 684.000 1458 3 DU Apartment 173.000 1458 10 TSF General Commercial 20.810 1458 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1458 20 SLIP Marina 14,000 1458 23 TSF General Office 29.260 1458 24 TSF Medical OMce 0.000 1458 32 TSF Library 4.800 1458 36 TSF Church 2,000 1459 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 9.000 1459 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 131.000 1459 3 DU Apartment 69.000 1459 7 ROOM Hotel 34.000 1459 10 TSF General Commercial 196,530 1459 11 ACRE Comm./Recreation 4.250 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 CIO Page 8 of 15 Analysis Year: Runld: Land Use: Network: 2040 BO06 GPA01 BO06 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/12/2005 Build rime: 8:00:00 PM Modeler: Marge Whiteman MTM TAT land Use Coda Udts Descrlptlon 1459 1459 13 15 TSF TSF Restaurant Fast Food Restaurant 1459 17 TSF Yacht Club 1459 1459 21 23 SEAT TSF Theater General Office 1459 1459 1460 1460 1460 1460 33 37 1 2 3 19 TSF TSF DU DU DU CRT Post Office Youth Ctr/Service Res-Low(SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) Apartment Tennis Club 1460 1461 1461 1461 38 1 2 10 ACRE DU DU TSF Park Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) General Commercial 1461 13 TSF Restaurant 1461 17 TSF Yacht Club 1461 20 SLIP Marina 1461 23 TSF General Office 1461 26 TSF Industrial 1461 38 ACRE Park 1402 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 1463 1463 3 10 DU TSF Apartment General Commercial 1463 1463 1464 1464 13 16 1 2 TSF TSF DU DU Restaurant Auto Dealer/Sales Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) 1464 1464 6 10 ROOM TSF Motel General Commercial 1464 1464 13 15 TSF TSF Restaurant Fast Food Restaurant 1464 23 TSF General Office 1464 24 TSF Medical Office 1464 33 TSF Post Office 1464 36 TSF Church 1464 38 ACRE Park 1465 1465 5 10 DU TSF Mobile Home General Commercial 1465 13 TSF Restaurant 0,000 0.000 0.000 350.000 60.000 1.700 4.970 677.000 194.000 51.000 2.000 0.830 214.000 263.000 4,990 20.000 8.290 352.000 12.000 5.040 0.780 32,000 520.000 112.450 21.550 17.420 43.000 3,119.000 4.000 73.070 16.550 5.430 18.370 2.750 1.900 3.000 1.620 397.000 60.630 18.190 Paae 9 of 15 CO Analysts Year. Runld: Lend Use: Network., 2040 BO06 GPA01 BO06 Reference Number 01232 Build Data., 4/12/2005 Build Time: 8:00:00 PM Modeler Marile Whiteman ' ' INTMTAZ l Wgo Cade Wh i111111 pUm) WIRY 1465 20 SLIP Marina 218.00D 1465 23 TSF General Office 30,310 ' 1466 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 212,000 1466 7 ROOM Hotel 754.000 1466 13 TSF Restaurant 83.930 ' 1466 19 CRT Tennis Club 16.000 1466 22 ACRE Newport Dunes 64,000 ' 1466 23 TSF General Office 6.000 1466 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 2.690 1466 40 ACRE Golf Course 2.000 ' 1467 3 DU Apartment 1,185.000 1468 29 STU Elementary/Private School 320.060 1469 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 792.000 ' 1469 3 DU Apartment 225.000 1469 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 6.450 ' 1469 29 STU Elementary/Private School 294.000 1469 30 STU Junior/High School 1,801.000 1469 36 TSF Church 34.960 ' 1469 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 34.970 1469 38 ACRE Park 8.000 1470 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 145.000 ' 1470 10 TSF General Commercial 78.230 1470 19 CRT Tennis Club 19.000 1470 23 TSF General Office 11,660 ' 1471 1 DU Res -Law (SFD) 460.000 1471 38 ACRE Park 2.000 ' 1472 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 209.750 1473 3 DU Apartment 300,000 1474 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 1,686.000 ' 1474 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 208.000 1474 3 DU Apartment 736.000 1474 10 TSF General Commercial 36.000 , 1474 13 TSF Restaurant 6.350 1474 38 ACRE Park 14.230 ' 1475 25 TSF R & D 81.730 1475 27 TSF Mlni-Storage/Warehouse 196.420 1475 29 STU Elementary/Pdvate School 52.000 ' 1475 33 TSF Post Office 55.200 1475 36 TSF Church 100.280 1476 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 227.000 ' Wednesday, April 13, 2005 r 11, Page 10 of 15 ' ' Analysis Year. Runld: Land Use: Network: 2040 B006 GPA01 B006 Reference Number; 01232 Build Date: 4/12/2005 Build Time: 8:00:00 PM Modeler. Marne Whiteman DDTM TAZ Lend Use Cods WO500.000 fti Dessrvi QUSn1ttY ' 1477 1478 1 2 DU DU Res•Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) 50.000 101.000 1479 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 54,000 1479 1480 2 2 DU DU (SFA) Res -Medium ( Res -Medium (SFA) 144.000 80.000 1480 3 DU Apartment 101.000 ' 1481 1481 1481 1 2 10 DU DU TSF Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) General Commercial 182.00 2.300 143.000 ' 1482 1482 1 2 DU DU Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) 43.000 73.000 1482 1482 3 40 DU ACRE Apartment Golf Course 181200 21.000 1483 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 425.000. 1484 1484 7 10 ROOM TSF Hotel General Commercial 21.700 0.000 1484 13 TSF Restaurant 955.030 ' 1484 1485 1485 23 9 10 TSF TSF TSF General Office Regional Commercial General Commercial 1,630.00 .000 1,700,000 ' 1485 21 SEAT Theater 0.000 1486 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 245.000 1486 1486 3 10 DU TSF Apartment General Commercial 12.0 0.00000 1486 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1486 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 881.000 ' 1486 1486 1487 23 31 2 TSF TSF DU General Office CulturailLeaming Center Res -Medium (SFA) 40.000 11.000 611.000 ' 1487 1487 1487 7 10 19 ROOM TSF CRT Hotel General Commercial Tennis Club 7.500 .0 11.63630 11 1487 23 TSF General Office 99.400 1487 148E 1489 1489 40 2 2 10 ACRE DU DU TSF Golf Course Res -Medium (SFA) Res-Medlum (SFA) General Commercial 122.000 228.000 5.000 115.800 1490 23 TSF General Office 468.640 ' 1491 1491 23 24 TSF TSF General Office Medical Office 351,950 Page 11 Of 15 ' Wednesday, Apol 13, 2005 C13 I Analysis Year. 2040 Reference Number01232 Runld: BOOS Build Date: 4/12/2005 Land Use: GPA01 Build 77me: 8:00:00 PM ' Network: B006 Modeler. Madle Whiteman WMTAZ LOON Code 90 McCiiptlon Qum* � 1492 10 TSF General Commercial 38.100 1492 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 ' 1492 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1492 21 SEAT Theater 2,150.00D 1492 23 TSF General Office 442.110 1493 23 TSF GeneralOfOoe 409.510 1494 10 TSF General Commercial 105.000 ' 1494 32 TSF Library 65.000 1495 1 DU Res -Law (SFD) 416.000 1495 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 37.000 ' 1495 10 TSF General Commercial 2.380 1495 17 TSF Yacht Club 62,020 1495 20 SLIP Marina 283.000 ' 1495 23 TSF GeneralOftice 186.530 1495 38 ACRE Park 6,530 ' 1496 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 73.000 1496 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 256.000 1496 3 DU Apartment 162.000 ' 1496 29 STU Elementary/Private School 12,030 1497 1 DU Res -LOW (SFD) 143.000 1497 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 214.000 ' 1497 3 DU Apartment 48.000 1498 1 OU Res-Low(SFD) 234.000 ' 1498 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 0.000 1498 3 DU Apartment 48,000 1498 10 TSF General Commercial 92.440 ' 1498 13 TSF Restaurant 01000 1498 23 TSF General Office 23,980 1498 38 ACRE Park 3.600 ' 1499 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 144.000 1500 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 178.000 1500 38 ACRE Park 1.030 ' 1501 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 849.000 1501 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 0.000 ' 1501 10 TSF General Commercial 106.840 1501 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1501 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1501 21 SEAT Theater 500.000 1501 23 TSF General Office 36.050 1501 24 TSF MedicalO8lce 0.000 ' Wednesday, April 13, 2005 Cj u Page 12 of 16 11 ' 01232 Reference Number: Analysts Year: 2040 Build Date: 4112/2005 ' Runld: Land Use: B006 GPA01 Build Time: 8:00:00 PM Mettle Whiteman Network: B006 Modeler. QUO" 'U98CP1M ISIMTAZ landU8n CON 04 2.500 1501 38 ACRE Park 18.000 ' 1502 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 0.000 0 1502 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 104.410 10 TSF General Commercial 0.000 1502 Restaurant ' 1502 13 TSF 0.000 1502 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 33.090 1502 23 TSF General Office 0.000 ' 1502 24 TSF Medical Office 52.000 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 0.000 1503 1503 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 88.020 General Commercial 1503 10 TSF 0.000 1503 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1503 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1503 18 TSF Health Club 9.970 1503 23 TSF -General Office 0.000 ' 1503 24 TSF Medical Office 542.000 1504 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 0.000 1504 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 88.020 General Commercial 1504 10 TSF 0.000 1504 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 ' 1504 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1504 18 TSF Health Club 9.970 1504 23 TSF General Office 0.000 ' 1504 24 TSF Medical Office 12.340 1504 36 TSF Church 843.000 1505 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 0.000 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 58.900 1505 General Commercial 1505 10 TSF 0.000 ' 1505 13 TSF Restaurant Restaurant 0.000 1505 15 TSF Fast Food 35.000 1505 23 TSF General Office 3.800 ' 1505 32 TSF Library 5.000 1505 33 TSF Post Office 363.000 1506 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 0.000 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 6.000 1506 1506 3 DU Apartment 142.000 1507 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 0.780 1507 38 ACRE Park 228,000 1508 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 120.000 ' 1508 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) Page 13 of 15 ' Wednesday, April 13. 2005 CAS Analysts Year, 2040 Runld: BO06 Land Use: GPA01 Network: BO06 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/12/2005 Build Tlme: 8:00:00 PM Modeler. Marile Whiteman IGTM TAZ lend Ilse Cede Wife 61"UN QeeeM 1508 3 DU Apartment 120.000 1508 29 STU Elementary/Private School 790.000 1508 37 TSF Youth Cir/Service 5.850 1510 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 200.000 1611 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 20.000 1511 10 TSF General Commercial 70.790 1512 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 246.000 1513 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 348.000 1513 4 DU Elderly Residential 10D.000 1513 18 TSF Health Club 1.000 1513 37 TSF Youth CU/Service 24.070 1514 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 41.000 1515 3 DU Apartment 388.000 1515 28 TSF Pre-school/DayCare 8.40D 1516 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 67.000 1516 4 DU Elderly Residential 100.000 1516 36 TSF Church 88.670 1517 3 DU Apartment 160.000 1517 10 TSF General Commercial 71.080 1517 23 TSF General Office 9.750 1517 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 13.390 1517 29 STU Elementary/Private School 406.000 1517 30 STU Junlor/High School 780.000 1517 36 TSF Church 31.380 1518 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 441.000 1518 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 67.000 1518 38 ACRE Park 0.950 1519 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 475.000 1519 38 ACRE Park 14.230 1620 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 207.000 1521 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 580.000 1621 29 STU Elementary/Pdvate School 498.000 1521 38 ACRE Park 9.730 1522 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 119.000 1522 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 120.000 1522 10 TSF General Commercial 96,540 1522 23 TSF General Office 12.900 1525 3 DU Apartment 1.100.000 1526 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 290.000 1527 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 126.000 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 C Page 14 of 15 Analysis Year: 2040 Runld: BO0S Land Use: GPA01 Network: BO06 WTYTA7 Iand IIN Coda LMS Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/12/2005 Build Time: 8:00:00 PM Modeler. Mettle Whiteman 1528 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 1528 36 TSF Church 1556 3 DU Apartment 1558 3 DU Apartment 1558 23 TSF General Office 1558 26 TSF Industrial 1559 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 1559 3 DU Apartment 1559 10 TSF General Commercial 1559 23 TSF General Office 1559 26 TSF Industrial 1618 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 1713 34 BED Hospital 1714 3 DU Apartment 1715 10 TSF General Commercial 1715 24 TSF Medical Office 1716 24 TSF Medical Office 1716 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home Wednesday pol 13.21 Quantity 7.320 26.010 1,220.000 1,052.000 117.800 82.200 225.000 238,000 50.000 117.800 82.200 6,000 443.000 673,000 17.760 142.430 142.430 95.000 I F APPENDIX D CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CHANGE BY TAZ F ublishedAdopted revised adopted TAZ trafficdist LU Code Quantity Occu anc LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate 1399 4 23 105,52 0.9 23 108.52 0.9 1400 4 23 62.08 0.9 23 62.08 019 1401 4 23 86.1 0.9 24 86.096 0.9 1402 4 23 45.79 0.9 23 45.794 0.9 1403 4 7 471 0,9 7 471 0.9 1403 41 13 8.9 0.9 10 16 0.9 1403 41 18 7.1 1 18 0 1 1403 4 23 393.05 0.9 23 393.05 0.9 1403 4 37 1 U 0.9 37 10.9 0.9 1404 4 23 434.953278 0.9 23 434.953 0.9 1405 4 10 96 0.9 10 129.3 0.9 1405 4 13 21,39 0.9 13 0 0.9 1405 4 15 11.91 0.9 15 0 0.9 1405 4 23 688.16 0.9 23 688.16 6.9 1406 41 25 280 0.91 25 0 0.9 1406 41 26 150 0.91 26 430 0.9 1407 51 10 31.72 0.91 10 31.72 0.9 1407 51 15 1.56 0.91 15 1.56 0.9 1407 5 23 124,99 0.91 23 124.99 0.9 1407 5 24 3.77 0.9 24, 3.77 0.9 1408 5 1 145 0.95 1 145 0.95 1409 5 7 300 0.9 7 300 0.9 1409 5 10 35 0.9 10 35 0.9 1409 5 13 8 019 13 8 0.9 1409 5 23 660 0.9 23 660 0.9 1409 51 38 3.33 1 38 3.33 1 1410 51 2 88 0.951 2 88 0.95 1411 51 10 1.38 0.91 10 1.38 0.9 1411 51 40 15.69 11 40 15.69 1 1412 61 1 60 0.951 1 60 0.95 1413 61 2 33 0.95 2 33 0.95 1413 61 18 60,33 1 18 60.33 1 1413 61 23 67.95 0.9 23 67,95 0.9 1413 61 39 45.91 1 39 45.91 1 1415 61 1 153 0.95 1 153 0.95 1415 61 36 8.73 1 36 8.73 1 1416 61 1 198 0.95 1 198 0.95 1417 61 1 56 0.951 1 56 0,95 1418 61 1 59 0,95 1 59 0.95 1419 61 1 173 0.95 1 173 0.95 1420 61 1 465 0.95 1 465 0.95 1421 61 1 116 0.95 1 116 0.95 1421 61 2 60 0.95 2 60 0.95 1421 61 3 352 0.95 3 352 0.95 1421 61 10 174.8 019 10 174,8 0.9 1421 6 13 4.37 0.9 13 4.37 0.9 1421 6 15 3 0.9 15 3 0.9 1421 6 23 214.66 0.91 23 214.661 019 1421 6 24 43.22 0.91 24 43.22 0.9 1421 6 29 636 1 29 636 1 1421 6 32 5.24 1 32 5.24 1 1422 6 1 490 0.95 1 490 0.95 1423 6 1 266 0.95 1 266 0.95 1423 6 371 18.23 1 37 18.23 1 1423 6 381 4 1 38 ' 4 1 1424 6 31 1445 0.95 31 14451 0.95 D4 I F I ublishedAdopted revised ado ted TAZ trafficdist LU Code Quantity Occu anc LU Code lQuantity Occu anc Rate 1432 2 13 17.57 0.9 13 0 0.9 1432 2 23 135.73 0.9 23 135,73 0.9 1432 2 24 11.29 0.9 24 11.29 0.9 1432 2 7 53 0.9 1433 2 2 98 0.95 2 0 0.95 1433 21 3 142 0.95 3 142 0.95 1433 21 23 67A 6 0.91 23 67.16 0.9 1433 21 24 24.46 0.91 24 24.46 0.9 1433 21 26 298.12 0.91 26 298.12 0.9 1433 21 35 270 11 35 270 1 1433 21 1 98 0.95 1434 21 2 673 0.95 3 673 0.95 1434 21 10 17.76 0.9 10 17.76 0.9 1434 21 23 9.66 0.9 23 9.66 0.9 1434 21 24 142.43 0.9 1434 21 24 284.86 0.9 24 142.43 0.9 1434 21 28 7.77 1 28 7.77 1 1434 21 34 1265 11 34 822 1 1434 2 34 443 1 1434 2 35 95 1 35 95 1 1435 1 1 68 0.95 1 68 0.95 1435 1 2 28 0.95 2 28 0.95 1435 1 10 10.8 0.9 10 10.8 0.9 1435 1 13 8.4 0.9 13 8.4 0.9 1435 1 15 2.7 0.9 15 2.7 0.9 1436 11 2 733 0,951 2 0 0.95 1436 11 3 489 0.951 3 1370 0.95 1436 li 4 148 1 4 0 1 1436 11 10 3.5 0.9 10 3.6 0.9 1436 11 24 39.6 0.9 24 39.6 0.9 1436 11 26 48.00169 0.9 26 48.002 0.9 1436 11 35 169 1 35 169 1 1436 11 38 0.17 1 38 0.17 1 1437 11 26 5 0.9 26 5 0.9 1438 11 23 57.4 0.9 23 57.4 0.9 1438 11 26 5 0.91 26 8.33 0.9 1438 11 27 3.33 0.91 27 0 0.9 1438 11 29 622 1 29 622 1 1439 11 2 33 0.95 2 0 0.95 1439 11 3 137 0.95 3 464 0.95 1439 11 5 294 0.95 5 0 0.95 1439 11 10 50.91 0.9 10 50.91 0.9 1439 11 23 239.51 0.9 23 239.51 0.9 1439 11 24 61.63 0.9 24 61.63 0.9 1439 11 25 425.67 0.91 25 0 0.9 1439 11 26 411.6 0.91 26 837.27 0.9 1439 11 35 59 11 35 591 1 1440 11 2 281 0.951 2 281 0.95 1441 11 1 462 0.951 1 462 0.95 1441 11 2 270 0.95 2 0 0.95 1441 11 3 23 0.95 3 293 0.95 1441 1 6 90 0.9 6 90 0.9 1441 1 10 35.94 0.9 10 50.03 0.9 1441 1 13 13.19 0.9 13 0 0.9 1441 1 15 0.9 0.9 15 01 0.9 1442 1 1 43 0.95 11 431 0.95 I L_> 1 11 ublishedAdo ted revised adopted TAZ trafficdlst LU Code Quantity Occu anc LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate 1454 3 11 0.85 1 1A 0.85 1 1454 3 13 35.67 0.8 13 0 0.9 1454 3 15 3.68 U 15 0 0.9 1454 3 23 101.5 0.9 23 101.5 0.9 1454 31 37 4.65 1 37 4.65 1 1455 31 1 3 0.9 1 3 0.9 1455 31 2 403 0.9 2 403 0.9 1455 31 10 108.22 0.8 10 108.22 0.9 1455 31 13 9.2 0.8 13 9.2 0.9 1455 31 23 1 0.9 23 1 0.9 1455 31 26 38 0.9 26 38 0.9 1456 31 1 1040 0.9 1 1040 0.9 1456 31 2 102 0.91 2 102 0.9 1456 31 3 26 0.91 3 26 0.9 1457 101 1 218 0.9 1 218 0.9 1457 101 2 476 0,9 2 476 0.9 1457 101 3 103 0.9 3 103 0.9 1457 101 5 58 0.9 5 58 0.9 1457 '101 6 26 0.9 6 26 0.9 1457 101 10 12.54 0.8 10 12.54 0.9 1457 101 15 1.25 0.9 15 1.25 0.9 1457 101 20 58 11 20 58 1 1457 101 28 13.44 1 28 13.44 1 1457 101 29 389 1 29 389 1 1457 101 36 10,05 1 36 10.05 1 1457 101 37 17.4 1 37 17.4 1 1457 101 38 1.2 1 38 1.2 1 1458 101 1 366 0.9 1 366 0.9 1458 101 2 684 0.9 2 684 0.9 1458 101 3 173 0.91 3 173 0.9 1458 101 10 17.58 0.8 10 20.81 0.9 1458 101 15 3.23 0.9 15 0 0.9 1458 101 20 14 1 20 14 1 1458 101 23 26.55 0.9 23 29.26 0.9 1458 101 24 2.71 0.9 24 0 0.9 1458 101 32 4.8 1 32 4.8 1 1458 101 36 2 1 36 2 1 1459 101 1 9 0.91 1 9 0.9 1459 101 2 131 0.9 2 131 0.9 1459 101 3 69 0.9 3 69 0.9 1459 101 7 34 0.9 7 34 0.9 1459 101 10 112.43 0.8 101 196.53 0.9 1459 101 11 4.25 1 11 4.25 1 1459 101 13 71.48 0.8 13 0 0.9 1459 101 15 12.62 0.9 15 0 0.9 1459 101 17 0.5 1 17 0 1 1459 101 21 350 1 21 350 1 1459 101 23 60 0.9 23 60 0.9 1459 101 33 1.7 1 33 1.7 1 1459 101 37 4.97 1 37 4.97 1 1460 101 1 677 0.9 1 677 0.9 1460 10 2 194 0.9 2 194 0.9 1460 10 3 51 0.9 3 51 0.9 10 19 2 1 19 2 1 j 10 38 0.83 1 38 0,83 1 9 1 2141 0.91 1 214l 0.9 0 i 1 ublishedAdopted revised adopted TAZ trafficdist LU Code Quantity Occu anc LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate 1474 11 2 208 0.95 2 208 0.95 1474 11 3 736 0.95 3 736 0.95 1474 11 10 35 0.9 10 35 0.9 1474 11 13 6.35 0.9 13 6.35 0.9 1474 11 38 14,23 1 38 14.23 1 1475 ill 25 81.73 0.9 25 81.73 0.9 1475 ill 27 196.42 0.9 27 196A2 0.9 1475 ill 29 52 1 29 52 1 1475 ill 33 55.2 1 33 55.2 1 1475 Ill 36 100.28 1 36 100.28 1 1476 ill 2 227 0.95 2 227 0.95 1477 Ill 1 500 0.95 1 500 0.95 1478 Ill 2 50 0.951 2 50 0.95 1479 ill 1 101 0.95 1 1011 0.95 1479 ill 2 54 0.95 2 54 0.95 1480 8 2 144 0.95 2 144 0.95 1480 8 3 80 0.95 3 80 0.95 1481 8 1 101 0.95 1 101 0.95 1481 8 2 182 0.95 2 182 0.95 1481 8 10 2.3 0.9 10 2.3 0.9 1482 8 1 142 0.951 1 142 0.95 1482 8 2 43 0:95 2 431 0.95 1482 81 3 73 0.95 3 73 0.95 1482 81 40 181.2 1 40 181.2 1 1483 81 1 21 0.95 1 21 0.95 1484 81 7 425 0.9 7 425 0.9 1484 81 13 21.7 0.9 13 0 0.9 1484 81 23 955.03 0.9 23 955.03 0.9 1484 81 10 21.7 0.9 1485 81 9 1633.85 0.8 9 1633.84 0.8 1485 81 21 1700 1 21 1700 1 1485 81 10 0 0.9 1486 81 2 245 0.95 2 0 0.95 1486 8 101 103.87 0.9 10 125.68 0.9 1486 8 13 13.1 0.9 13 0 0.9 1486 8 16 8.71 11 16 0 1 1486 8 23 881 0.9 23 8811 0.9 1486 8 31 40 1 31 40 1 1486 3 245 0.95 1487 8 2 69 0.95 2 69 0.96 1487 8 7 611 0.9 7 611 0.9 1487 8 10 7.5 0.9 10 7.5 0.9 1487 8 19 22 1 19 22 1 1487 8 23 11.63 0.91 23 11.63 0.9 1487 8 40 99.44 1 40 99.41 1 1488 8 2 122 0.95 2 122 0.95 1489 8 2 228 0.95 2 228 0.95 1489 81 10 5 0.9 10 5 0.9 1490 81 23 115.8 0.9 23 115.8 0.9 1491 81 23 468.64 0.9 23 468.64 0.9 1491 8 24 351.95 0.9 24 351.95 0:9 1492 8 10 7.87 0.9 10 38.1 0.9 1492 8 13 14.1 0.91 13 0 019 1492 8 18 16.13 1 18 0 1 1492 8 21 2150 1 21 2150 1 1492 8 23 442.11 0.91 23 442.11 0.9 1 Ow I 1 ul ublishedAdo ted I revised ado ted TAZ trafficdist LU Code Quantity Occu anc LU Code Quantity Occupanc Rate 1504 13 23 9.37 0.9 23 9.97 0.9 1504 13 24 0.6 0:9 24 0 0.9 1504 13 36 12.34 1 36 12.34 1 1504 13 1 542 0.95 1505 13 1 47 0.95 1 843 0.95 1505 131 2 796 0.95 2 0 0.95 1505 131 10 33.38 0.91 10 58.9 019 1505 131 13 25 0.9 13 0 0.9 1505 131 15 0.52 0.9 15 0 0.9 1505 131 23 35 0.9 23 35 0.9 1505 131 32 3.8 1 32 3.8 1 1505 131 33 5 1 33 5 1 1506 131 1 163 0.95 1 363 0.95 1506 131 2 201 0.95 2 0 0.95 1506 13 3 6 0.951 3 6 0.95 1507 13 1 142 0.951 1 142 0.95 1507 13 38 0.78 1 38 0.78 1 1508 13 1 228 0.95 1 228 0.95 1508 13 2 120 0.95 2 120 0.95 1508 13 3 120 0.95 3 120 0.95 1508 13 29 790 1 29 790 1 1508 131 37 5.85 1 37 5.85 1 1510 131 1 200 0195 1 200 0.95 1511 131 1 20 0.951 1 20 0.95 1511 131 10 70.79 0.9 10 70.79 0.9 1512 131 2 246 0.95 2 246 0.95 1513 131 1 348 0195 1 348 0.95 1513 131 4 100 1 4 100 1 1513 13 18 1 1 18 1 1 1513 13 37 24.07 1 37 24.07 1 1514 13 1 41 0.95 1 41 0.95 1515 12 3 388 0,951 3 388 0.95 1515 12 28 8.4 1 28 B.4 1 1516 12 2 67 0.95 2 67 0.95 1516 12 4 100 1 4 100 1 1516 121 36 88.67 1 36 88.67 1 1517 121 3 160 0.95 3 160 0.95 1517 121 10 71.08 0.9 10 71.08 0.9 1517 121 23 9.75 0.9 23 915 0.9 1517 121 28 13.39 11 28 13.39 1 1517 121 29 406 1 29 406 1 1517 12 30 780 1 30 780 1 1517 12 36 31.38 1 36 31.38 1 1518 12 1 441 0.95 1 441 0.95 1518 12 2 67 0.95 2 67 0.95 1518 12 38 0195, 1 38 0.95 1 1519 12 1 476 0.95 1 475 0.95 1519 12 38 14.23 1 38 14.23 1 1520 12j 1 207 0.95 1 207 0.95 1521 121 1 580 0.95 1 580 0.95 1521 121 29 498 1 29 498 1 1521 12 38 9.73 1 38 9.73 1 1522 12 1 119 0.95 1 119 0.95 1522 12 21 120 0.95 2 120 0.95 1522 12 101 96.54 0.9 10 96.54 0.9 1522 12 23 12.9 0.9 23 12.9 0.9 N7- C`I I1 II 1 1 ublishedAdopted revised adopted TAZ trafflcdist LU_Code Quantit Occupant QuantityOccupancyRate 1525 11 3 1100 0.95 1100 0.95 1526 11 1 290 0.95 290 0.95 1527 11 2 125 0.95 Fi 125 0.95 1528 11 28 7.32 1 7.32 1 1528 11 36 26.01 1 26.01 1 1556 1 1220 0.9 1558 1 3 1052 0.9 1558 1 23 117.8 0.9 1558 1 26 82.2 0.9 1559 1 1 225 0.9 1559 1 3 238 0.9 1559 1 10 50 0.9 1559 1 23 117.8 0.9 1559 1 26 82.2 0.9 1618 11 1 6 0.95 1 60.95 U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\TGcalc\LandUseAltsTGCom are\LuForModel\ Ado tedLuChan e.xis Com areAdo ted D)3 11 ill 1-1 �71 .1 'I Total Trip Ends By NBTM TAZ 2002 Reference Number: 01232 Analysis Year. Build Date: 4/13/2005 Runld: Try8A Build Time: 12:00:00 PM Land Use: Try8A Modeler. Marlie Whiteman Network: ExVa06 HOTM HO Prod H8ch Attr HBchOProd HW ttr T Prod 00 At' 00 OW A6ttr M Total TAZ NO AHr 8 7Prod 9� ss 1373 373 0 0 285 0 264 271 186 189 1,565 1374 371 0 0 0 0 467 477 301 306 2,661 1375 671 0 0 0 440 0 422 433 297 301 2,500 1376 592 0 0 0 456 0 583 598 410 417 3,456 1377 819 0 0 0 630 0 667 685 469 477 3,957 1378 938 0 0 0 721 0 434 467 601 616 3,731 1379 4`i2 0 0 0 1,171 197 212 273 279 1,692 1380 201 0 0 0 531 0 0 275 296 381 391 2,367 1381 281 0 0 0 743 399 429 552 566 3,431 1382 407 0 0 0 1,077 0 261 281 361 371 2,244 1383 266 0 0 0 705 0 0 270 276 185 188 1,581 1384 381 0 0 0 281 0 399 405 361 399 2,645 1385 430 0 0 0 650 0 211 227 293 300 1,817 1386 215 0 0 0 571 0 229 246 317 325 1,967 1387 233 0 0 0 617 0 832 833 311 313 3,858 1388 1,319 0 0 0 251 0 804 823 553 563 4,715 1389 1,133 0 0 0 840 0 182 196 252 258 1,563 1390 185 0 0 0 491 0 121 130 167 172 1,039 1391 123 0 0 0 326 0 362 377 337 344 2,469 1392 461 0 0 0 587 0 479 480 179 180 2,222 1393 760 0 0 0 144 0 510 519 379 403 3,081 1394 655 0 0 0 615 0 425 428 253 270 2,321 1395 584 0 0 0 362 0 762 820 1,055 1,082 6,554 1396 777 0 0 0 2,057 213 229 294 302 1,828 1397 217 0 0 0 574 0 0 106 114 147 151 915 1398 108 0 0 0 287 0 136 146 188 193 1,169 1399 139 0 0 0 367 80 86 111 114 688 1400 82 0 0 0 216 0 0 236 239 195 215 1,495 1401 272 0 0 0 339 59 63 82 84 507 1402 60 0 0 0 159 0 0 1,272 1,319 1,274 1,343 8,978 1403 1,457 0 0 0 2,313 560 603 776 796 4,818 1404 571 0 0 0 1,513 0 0 1,956 2,025 1,637 1,671 12,618 1405 2,593 0 0 0 2,737 0 151 181 408 408 2,092 1406 76 0 0 0 868 9 446 459 330 335 2,728 1407 614 13 0 1 521 f,3 Page 1 a Wednesday, April 13, 2005 Analysis Year. Rdnld: Land Use; Network: 2002 Try8A Try8A ExVa06 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date:411312005 Build lime: 12:00:00 PM Modeler, Marlle Whiteman MBTM TAZ MO AtW MO Prod Bob Ate Bch Prod NW A W NW Prod 00 Attr 00 Prod OW Attr OW Prod Total 1408 93 518 0 48 45 265 96 96 46 21 1,230 1409 1,732 0 0 0 2,826 0 1,482 1,550 1,649 1,606 10,746 4410 31 247 0 28 11 152 44 45 18 2 579 1411 34 0 0 0 16 0 24 24 12 13 124 1412 38 209 0 19 18 107 39 39 19 18 495 1413 282 93 0 11 544 57 262 275 293 297 2,114 1414 89 347 6 35 153 153 104 107 92 78 1,164 1415 101 551 0 51 57 282 105 106 53 27 4,333 1416 126 668 0 66 62 365 128 128 64 29 1,636 1417 36 202 0 19 18 103 37 38 18 8 478 1418 38 209 0 20 18 109 39 39 19 9 Boo 1419 112 623 0 58 64 319 116 116 56 25 1,478 1420 300 1,648 0 155 146 857 309 309 149 68 3,940 1421 2,216 1,477 560 137 1,056 840 1,63E 1,655 862 782 11,223 1422 316 1,737 0 163 154 903 325 326 157 71 4,152 1423 236 943 0 88 233 490 255 255 163 130 2,793 1424 504 3,694 0 327 185 2,146 723 723 298 27 8,627 1425 159 0 0 0 384 0 153 163 199 205 1,264 1426 81 418 0 39 Be 217 85 86 48 28 1,062 1427 727 1',938 1;922 188 910 994 700 719 568 487 9,154 1428 3,767 1,432 0 118 1,208 690 2,594 2,600 1,147 1,111 14,668 1429 468 2,555 384' 236 305 1,319 499 502 269 141 6,678 1430 3,26E 108 0 10 1,232 55 2,168 2;185 1,053 1,068 11,148 1431 2,077 105 0 8 648 53 1,357 1,366 609 609 6,833 1432 1,027 1,323 0 128 610 708 809 $19 465 404 6,293 1433 331 696 0 99 789 377 376 395 430 405 3,897 1434 635 0 0 0 1,415 0 820 830 672 986 5,357 1435 400 319 0 32 91 174 277 278 109 92 1,772 1436 647 2,783 0 301 405 1,824 702 707 387 166 7,822 1437 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 2 2 a 143E 64 6 547 1 258 4 73 81 127 129 1,290 1439 1,175 1,062 0 114 1,733 697 1,068 1,114 1,013 943 8,919 1440 97 756 0 90 36 486 139 139 58 5 1,806 1441 960 2,401 0 217 390 1,270 831 833 386 261 7,550 1442 102 725 0 80 45 437 135 135 59 13 1,731 1443 219 1,477 0 155 96 800 275 275 122 31 3,509 1444 212 1,521 0 168 85 913 278 278 119 22 3,596 Wednesday, Apol 13, 2005� Page 2 of 6 ' Analysis Year. Runid: Land Use: Network, 2002 Reference Number: 01232 Try8A Build Date: 4/13/2005 Try8A Build Time: 12:00:00 PM ExVa06 Modeler. Marlie Whiteman STM TAZ NO Or N0 Prod NSoh Attr NSoh Prod OW Attr HW Prod 00 Attr 00 Prod OW AUP OW Prod Total 1445 229 1,515 0 155 96 597 291 291 129 28 3,331 1446 156 934 0 93 73 513 174 174 81 30 2,228 1447 130 789 0 77 58 299 152 152 70 21 1,748 1448 488 442 0 42 147 165 351 352 153 127 2,268 1449 991 218 0 23 259 69 657 659 274 261 3,431 1450 958 147 0 16 344 60 644 649 306 299 3,423 1451 1,055 340 0 35 262 136 710 712 289 270 3,808 1452 1,633 29 0 3 '685 12 1,213 1,223 587 596 6,180 1453 1,524 0 0 0 558 0 1,002 1,011 482 490 5,067 1464 2,749 177 0 16 971 65 1,814 1,828 859 860 9,339 1455 305 992 0 9B 164 340 309 313 159 84 2,763 1456 571 3,839 0 252 252 1,010 647 648 267 112 7,598 1457 667 2,150 342 215 546 829 709 713 422 301 6,894 145E 820 3,379 0 327 363 1,285 833 835 393 184 8,417 1459 2,634 341 0 34 682 135 1,736 1,739 718 707 8,726 1460 467 2,449 0 218 234 877 494 495 240 110 5,583 1461 971 1,716 0 129 346 503 773 777 341 261 5,819 1462 21 128 0 9 10 36 22 22 10 4 262 1463 1,643 1,640 0 ill 358 462 1,201 1,203 454 363 7,435 1464 2,299 6,009 0 594 780 2,318 2,007 2,012 888 512 17,420 1465 251 637 0 85 83 342 231 232 104 49 2,014 1466 1,154 330 0 47 1,464 254 1,133 1,129 787 1,053 7,352 1467 404 2,829 0 268 151 1,760 574 574 245 22 6,826 1468 5 0 282 0 55 0 10 12 26 26 415 1469 540 2,586 1,844 304 892 1,704 752 766 587 427 10,402 1470 1,152 480 0 46 397 251 831 831 350 386 4,723 1471 317 2,058 0 153 146 848 347 347 149 68 4,432 1472 1,713 0 0 0 499 0 1,105 1,111 484 488 5,400 1473 35 313 0 20 11 134 53 53 19 2 640 1474 1,008 3,007 0 289 291 1,762 943 944 388 183 8,815 1475 214 0 30 0 908 0 283 303 447 474 2,659 1476 86 820 0 69 28 374 129 129 45 4 1,683 1477 235 1,554 0 113 106 625 258 259 109 49 3,308 1478 20 190 0 16 6 86 30 30 10 1 390 1479 92 668 0 51 39 280 109 109 44 16 1,406 1480 92 899 0 64 29 368 140 140 46 4 1,783 1481 171 1,236 0 92 61 501 210 210 76 25 2,581 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 1!c- Page 3 of 6 I Analysis Year. Runld: Land Use: Network: 2002 Try8A Try8A ExVa06 Rererance Number: 01232 Build Date.4/13/2005 Build Time: 12:00:00 PM Modeler. Made Whiteman IWTM TAZ N AUP N KW IM AM IM Prod NW AM rW Prod HAW 00 Prod OW Attr oW Prod Toth 1482 333 1,152 0 77 205 444 332 332 164 128 3,167 1483 15 102 0 7 7 39 17 17 7 3 213 1484 1,932 0 0 0 3,963 0 1,774 1,873 2,098 2,176 13,816 1485 9,786 0 0 0 2,507 0 6,290 6,309 2,606 2,643 30,141 1486 2,917 831 0 55 3,450 364 2,346 2,432 2,033 2,038 16,466 1487 1,143 248 0 22 1,451 119 1,048 1,056 820 949 6,856 1488 47 438 0 39 16 211 71 71 25 2 920 1489 151 818 0 73 41 394 172 172 62 19 1,903 1490 152 0 0 0 403 0 149 161 207 212 1-,283 1491 1,727 0 0 0 3,014 0 1,570 1,628 1,634 1,735 11,308 1492 1,205 0 0 0 1,730 0 979 1,024 970 994 6,902 1493 538 0 0 0 1,424 0 527 568 731 749 4,536 1494 1;470 0 0 0 559 0 992 995 476 496 4,986 1495 1,006 1,637 0 122 1,014 491 877 897 646 592 7,282 1496 147 1,121 10 92 58 360 198 198 79 16 2,279 1497 175 1,143 0 107 74 418 216 216 95 24 2,467 1498 924 1,041 0 87 255 352 669 670 280 227 4,505 1499 85 461 0 39 41 155 88 88 42 19 1,019 1500 122 774 0 59 57 328 132 132 5B 26 1,688 1501 1,696 2,814 0 209 551 839 1,291 1,296 561 439 9,695 1502 1,255 620 0 43 334 175 840 843 352 328 4,690 1503 649 168 0 12 141 50 423 424 165 158 2,189 1504 1,351 1,679 0 162 391 898 981 983 420 338 7,203 1505 1,219 2,672 0 258 507 1,428 985 989 478 347 8,883 ism 168 914 0 88 82 491 174 174 85 37 2,212 1507 97 626 0 47 45 260 106 106 46 21 1,353 1508 232 1,346 671 116 266 640 281 285 186 126 4,149 1510 134 814 0 67 63 369 143 143 64 29 1,825 1511 759 81 0 7 148 37 485 485 182 180 2,364 1512 92 807 0 79 31 426 135 135 51 5 1,761 1513 364 1,804 0 135 316 676 417 417 235 171 4,536 1514 28 173 0 14 13 76 30 30 13 6 382 1515 173 1,160 0 88 117 576 245 245 115 48 2,768 1516 107 512 0 41 202 150 151 155 124 99 1,541 1517 1,053 471 1,035 36 602 238 780 790 447 431 5,883 1518 351 2,674 0 167 147 925 414 415 155 66 5,313 1519 315 1,857 0 155 156 861 334 335 155 74 4,243 1 1 C Wednesday, April 13, 2005 i 0 Page 4 of 6 2002 Reference Number: 01232 Analysts Year: Build Date: 4/13/2005 Runld: Try8A Build Time: 12:00:00 PM Land Use: Try8A Modeler. Marlie Whiteman Network: ExVa06 NNiM NO Prod NSoh Attr NSoh Prod NW Attr NW Prod 00 AmNN Prod OW Attr OW Prod Total iota TAZ NN Am 65 382 145 145 67 30 1,853 1520 137 814 0 69 274 1,069 427 431 230 129 5,894 1521 396 2,307 438 193 798 800 311 269 5,263 1522 1,108 1,193 0 78 278 427 4 510 1523 30 247 p 19 16 85 45 45 19 510 1524 30 247 0 19 16 85 45 45 19 q 0 159 90 1,042 380 380 145 13 4,567 1525 259 2,098 330 126 126 58 286 14G13 1526 119 712 0 60 56 7 1527 6 0 0 0 13 0 7 7 45 53 60 343 1528 35 0 0 0 105 0 44 281 115 44 902 3,0 1529 198 1,842 330 128 121 566 278 p p 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 1530 106 233 571 562 564 247 10 4,2076 1531 724 1,085 0 0 1532 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 83 46 28 961 1534 59 425 0 36 61 141 82 115' 44 3,902 1535 198 1,842 330 128 121 566 278 281 2,855 692 449 0 36 195 141 478 481 201 181 1536 36 1 195 141 478 481 201 181 2,855 1537 692 449 0 20 155 73 73 28 4 1,006 1538 60 552 0 40 222 101 101 34 0 1,396 1539 84 780 0 56 17 56 56 56 65 386 1540 47 0 p 0 107• 0 92 93 45 17 1,280 1541 75 654 0 52 50 202 3 1542 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 57 0 64 1 102 1 102 585 1543 53 0 p 0 206 0 0 0 1544 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 102 0 102 585 1546 53 0 p 0 206 0 57 46 28 961 1547 59 425 0 36 61 141 82 83 28 961 1648 59 425 0 36 61 141 82 83 46 961 1549 59 425 0 36 61 141 82 83 46 28 0 6 2 28 10 10 4 0 147 1550 9 77 0 0 0 0 0 1551 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 1552 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 1553 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 16 17 97 1554 8 0 0 0 32 0 11 12 16 17 97 1555 8 0 0 0 32 0 11 12 0 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 1557 1 10 4 4 1 0 42 1558 2 18 0 2 Page 5 of 6 Analysis Year 2002 Runld: Try8A Land Use: Try8A NetWork: ExVa06 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/13/2005 Build7lme: 12:00:00 PM Modeler, Madie Whiteman MTM TAZ M AUP IM Prod RM AUP WA Prod ION AUP IN Prod 00 AUP 00 Prod ON AUP OW Prod Toth 1559 2 18 0 2 1 10 4 4 1 0 ° 42 1616 4 24 0 2 2 11 4 4 2 1 54 1713 110 0 0 0 541 0 157 169 263 279 1,519 1714 227 1,698 0 215 86 1,164 322 322 139 12 4,186 1715 550 0 0 0 440 0 423 426 283 306 2,427 1716 333 29 0 13 439 4 295 299 250 275 1,938 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 � p Pade 6 of 6 I G APPENDIX F CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT TRIP GENERATION I 1 1 Total Trip Ends By NBTM TAZ Analysis Year: 2040 Reference Number: 01232 Runld: 8006 Build Date: 4/12/2005 Lend Use: GPA01 Build Time: 9:00:00 PM Network: B006 Modeler. Marlie Whiteman ASch AT Prod NW Attr OW Prod 00 Attl' 00 Prod OW OW Prod iota M Attr W Prod TAZ 0 0 387 0 395 404 61 261 265 2,274 1373 563 0 0 387 0 395 404 261 265 2,274 1374 563 0 0 584 0 607 621 397 403 3,481 1375 869 0 0 0 0 619 0 631 646 417 424 3,638 1376 902 0 0 889 0 908 928 599 609 5,229 1377 1,296 0 0 0 0 1,005 0 1,026 1,049 678 688 5,912 137E 1,465 0 0 0 1,216 0 450 485 624 639 3,873 1379 459 0 0 0 552 0 204 220 283 290 1,757 1380 208 0 0 771 0 286 307 396 406 2,457 1381 291 0 0 0 0 1,118 0 414 446 574 588 3,562 1382 422 0 0 731 0 271 292 375 385 2,330 1383 276 0 0 0 0 296 0 294 301 197 201 1,708 1364 418 0 0 650 0 399 405 361 399 2,645 1385 430 0 0 0 794 0 294 316 407 417 2,528 1386 300 0 0 0 641 0 237 256 329 337 2,042 1387 242 0 0 0 264 0 875 876 327 329 4,057 1388 1,387 0 0 0 0 684 704 519 529 4,202 1389 937 0 0 0 829 0 189 203 261 268 1,623 1390 192 0 0 0 509 0 125 135 174 178 1,079 1391 128 0 0 0 339 0 370 386 347 355 2,534 1392 469 0 0 0 608 0 479 480 179 180 2,222 1393 760 0 0 0 144 0 605 614 455 48B 3,671 1394 764 0 0 0 746 604 0 1,177 1,181 540 560 5,831 1395 1,770 0 0 0 0 2,057 0 762 820 1,055 1,082 6,554 1396 777 0 0 0 574 0 213 229 294 302 1,828 1397 217 0 0 0 287 0 106 114 147 151 915 1398 108 0 0 0 377 0 140 150 194 198 1,202 1399 142 0 0 0 216 0 ,80 86 111 114 688 1400 82 0 0 0 339 0 236 239 195 215 1,496 1401 272 0 0 159 0 59 63 82 84 507 1402 60 0 0 0 0 2,363 0 1,218 1,265 1,279 1,355 8,820 1403 1,340 0 0 0 1,513 0 560 603 776 796 4,818 1404 571 0 0 0 2,714 0 1,952 2,021 1,62-7 1,660 12,567 1405 2,593 0 0 979 0 170 204 460 460 2,356 1406 85 0 0 0 535 0 454 467 337 344 2,761 1407 624 0 0 0 13, �3 ge1of6 Analysts Year. Runld: Land Use: Network: 2040 Bo06 GPA01 B006 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/12/2005 Build7lme: 9:00:00 PM Modeler. Madle Whiteman NBTM TAZ MO AUP NO Prod Rd AM M Prod MW Attr RW Prod 00 AM 00 Prod OW Attr 0W Prod Tatty 1408 94 522 0 48 45 267 97 97 47 21 1,239 0 0 0 2,970 0 1,571 1,642 1,630 1,693 11,341 1409 1,835 31 247 0 28 11 152 44 45 18 2 579 1410 34 0 0 0 16 0 24 24 12 13 124 1411 1412 39 216 0 20 19 111 40 40 19 9 513 451 93 0 11 487 57 374 381 293 308 2,454 1413 98 476 6 40 159 172 119 122 95 82 1,371 1414 103 551 0 51 66 282 108 109 58 32 1,360 1415 126 668 0 66 62 365 128 128 64 29 1,636 1416 1417 36 202 0 19 18 103 37 38 16 8 478 1418 38 209 0 20 18 109 39 39 19 9 500 1419 112 023 0 58 54 319 116 116 56 25 1,478 1420 300 1,648 0 155 146 857 309 309 149 6B 3,940 1421 3,080 1,477 560 137 1,600 840 2,237 2,266 1,240 1,166 14,603 1422 316 1,737 0 163 154 903 325 326 157 71 4,152 1423 236 943 0 88 233 490 255 255 163 130 2,793 1424 504 3,694 0 327 185 2,146 723 723 298 27 8,627 1425 204 0 0 0 502 0 197 210 260 267 1,640 1426 97 422 0 40 120 219 106 108 79 61 1,252 1427 794 1,978 1,922 192 968 1,016 756 776 606 527 9,534 1426 5,016 1,454 0 120 1,665 699 3,417 3,430 1,543 1,512 18,856 1429 468 2,554 384 236 305 1,319 499 502 269 141 6,677 1430 4,106 108 0 10 1,860 65 2,764 2,796 1,465 1,488 14,652 1431 2,074 106 0 B 647 53 1,355 1,364 608 608 6;824 1432 1,415 1,826 0 191 894 1,045 1,146 1,162 673 580 8,933 1433 378 735 0 102 1,182 402 456 489 618 591 4,953 0 0 4,65B 0 2,846 2,798 2,247 3,330 18,081 1434 2,201 0 32 91 174 277 278 109 92 1,772 1435 400 664 319 3,108 0 0 333 527 2,041 833 840 474 231 9,052 1436 0 0 11 0 2 2 5 5 27 1437 1 0 0 547 0 326 0 96 106 162 164 1,487 1438 86 1,504 1,053 0 113 3,195 691 1,458 11551 1,729 1,669 12,964 1439 97 756 0 90 36 486 139 139 58 5 1,806 1440 1441 1,156 2,434 0 220 428 1,287 956 960 434 306 8,183 1442 105 745 0 83 46 449 138 138 60 13 1,777 1443 224 1,551 0 165 95 916 288 288 126 28 3,682 1444 235 1,713 0 190 93 1,036 312 313 133 23 4,048 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 rq Page 2 of 6 Analysis Year: 2040 Reference Build Number, 01232 Date: 4/12/2005 Runid: Bo06 Build Time: 9:00:00 PM Land Use: GPA01 Modeler. Marlfe Whiteman Network.' 9006 OTM m Prod HSch Attr NSch Prod NW Atfi' IIW Prod DD Attr 00 Prod OW Attr OW Prod Tote 3,690 TAZ ND Attr 103 667 323 323 142 28 1445 250 1,681 0 173 642 203 203 24 2,617 1446 164 1,102 0 118 71 247 248 8 10 10 19 2,828 1447 189 1,290 0 134 76 516 361 362 161 129 2,436 1448 487 527 0 51 157 201 687 690 285 271 3,589 1449 1,036 231 0 25 267 96 694 698 317 292 3,935 1450 1,001 394 0 43 333 163 788 790 324 304 4,203 1451 1,173 349 0 36 299 140 12 1,223 1,233 591 600 6,227 1452 1,849 29 0 3 688 0 1,134 1,148 611 622 5,989 1453 1,686 0 0 0 787 930 219 1,925 1,936 873 847 10,211 1454 2,875 549 0 57 409 1,199 1,203 494 424 6,984 1455 1,718 990 0 107 439 1,285 825 826 342 146 9,691 1456 32 732 4,890 0 321 324 751 754 440 315 7,171 145 7 2,211 342 221 563 853 854 412 202 8,321 1458 829 3,209 0 319 396 1,250 850 1,911 1,920 847 827 9,996 1459 2,850 504 0 52 882 203 547 548 262 112 6,194 1460 504 2,728 0 250 249 995 777 341 261 5,819 1461 971 1,716 0 129 346 503 773 4 262 1462 21 128 0 9 10 36 22 1,571 22 1,574 10 592 502 9,152 1463 2,230 1,640 0 111 470 462 2,373 2,378 997 438 21,090 1464 2,447 7,683 0 '837 748 3,189 1,017 1,021 441 368 6,143 1465 1,435 869 0 116 409 467 2,463 2,488 1,511 1,801 14,671 1466 3,073 476 0 68 2,406 367 574 574 245 22 6,826 1467 404 2,829 0 268 151 1,760 26 26 415 1468 5 0 282 0 55 0 10 12 770 592 433 10,434 1469 543 2,586 1,844 304 903 1,704 756 369 405 4,957 1470 1,232 480 0 46 412 251 881 881 347 149 68 4,432 1471 317 2,058 0 153 146 848 347 1,504 654 661 7,308 1472 2,318 0 0 0 675 0 1,496 62 6 2,132 1473 118 1,043 0 68 38 445 176 176 1,947 876 404 21,604 1474 1,984 8,328 0 793 767 4,560 1,945 551 590 3,358 1475 291 0 46 0 1,112 0 372 395 47 4 1,769 1476 90 861 0 72 29 393 136 136 161 73 4,879 1477 347 2,291 0 166 157 921 381 382 1 390 1478 20 190 0 16 6 86 30 30 10 44 16 1,406 1479 92 668 0 51 39 280 109 109 46 4 1,783 1480 92 899 0 64 29 368 140 140 , 77 25 2,594 1481 177 1,236 0 92 61 501 213 213 Page 3 of 6 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 S Analysis Year. Runld: Land Use: Network: 2040 8006 GPA01 8006 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/12/2005 Build Time: 9;00:00 PM Modeler. Madre Whiteman WTM TAT NO Attr NO Prod NSoh Attr lade Prod NW Attr NW Prod 00 Attr 00 Prod OW AM 0W Prod TO 1482 333 1,152 0 77 205 444 332 332 164 128 3,167 1483 15 102 0 7 7 39 17 17 7 3 213 1484 2,062 0 0 0 4,167 0 1,895 1,996 2,211 2,300 14,630 1485 12,657 0 0 0 3,224 0 8,132 8,156 3,362 3,410 38,940 1486 2,958 831 0 55 3,591 364 2,393 2,482 2,104 2,111 16,889 1487 1,157 248 0 22 1,472 119 1,060 1,069 832 961 6,939 1488 47 438 0 39 16 211 71 71 25 2 920 1489 154 818 0 73 42 394 173 173 63 20 1,910 1490 152 0 0 0 403 0 149 161 207 212 1,283 1491 1,727 0 0 0 3,014 0 1,570 1,626 1,634 1,735 11,308 1492 1,259 0 0 0 1,756 0 1,015 1,060 990 11015 7,094 1493 538 0 0 0 1,424 0 527 568 731 749 4,fi36 1494 1,476 0 0 0 560 0 996 999 476 497 5,004 1495 1,107 1,667 0 125 1,080 501 956 976 693 641 7,745 1496 190 1,478 11 121 73 474 261 261 103 18 2,990 1497 175 1,143 0 107 74 418 216 216 95 24 2,467 1498 1,400 895 0 75 391 303 966 969 410 365 5,773 1499 a8 478 0 40 43 160 91 91 44 20 11055 1500 122 774 0 59 57 328 132 132 56 26 1,688 1501 2,023 3,176 0 235 673 946 1,530 1,535 673 536 11,328 1502 1,522 617 0 52 430 207 1,021 1,025 438 410 5,722 1503 1,196 195 0 14 269 58 773 775 305 299 3,864 1504 1,516 1,869 0 180 449 999 1,102 1,104 476 384 8,078 1505 1,376 2,906 0 280 579 1,554 1,105 1,110 640 397 9,847 1506 234 1,266 0 122 115 678 240 241 118 53 3,067 1507 98 631 0 47 45 262 107 107 46 21 1,363 1508 275 1,691 695 141 286 806 343 348 211 130 4,927 1510 134 814 0 67 63 369 143 143 64 29 1,825 1511 938 81 0 7 182 37 598 598 225 223 2,889 1512 92 807 0 79 31 426 135 135 51 5 1,761 1513 364 1,804 0 135 316 676 417 417 235 171 4,536 1514 28 173 0 14 13 76 30 30 13 6 382 1515 173 1,160 0 as 117 576 245 245 116 48 2,768 1516 107 512 0 41 202 150 151 155 124 99 1,541 1517 1,081 471 1,044 36 608 238 798 808 454 438 5,974 1518 352 2,684 0 168 147 929 416 416 156 66 5,335 1519 320 1,889 0 158 159 875 340 340 158 75 4,314 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 �� Page 4 of 6 Analysis Year: Runld: Land Use: Network., 2040 B006 GPA01 8006 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/1212005 Build Time: 9:00:00 PM Modeler. Marne Whiteman ND Prod N8ch Attr NSch Prod 814 0 69 2,307 438 193 1,193 0 78 1,266 0 64 1,266 0 64 3,288 0 249 1,153 0 96 399 0 40 0 0 0 4,331 362 193 0 0 0 1,721 0 127 p 0 0 1,931 0 102 4,331 362 193 1,247 0 69 1,247 0 69 945 0 48 1,141 0 58 0 0 0 956 0 5& 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,785 0 120 749 0 33 0 0 0 1,931 0 102 1,931 0 102 1,931 0 102 959 0 60 495 0 22 0 0 0 736 0 33 402 0 18 402 0 18 2,921 0 261 449 0 28 NW Attr 65 274 337 240 240 141 91 16 113 139 0 267 0 80 139 205 205 22 110 675 51 5 292 87 11 292 80 80 80 17 7 0 11 108 108 148 18 NW Prod 382 1,069 427 278 278 1,633 534 216 0 842 0 677 0 397 842 269 269 187 227 0 226 0 0 578 161 0 397 397 397 283 108 0 160 87 87 1,716 150 DD Attr 145 427 993 263 263 595 204 68 48 550 0 672 0 261 550 574 574 113 151 352 120 1 72 340 90 72 261 261 261 117 60 0 89 77 77 575 92 DD Prod 145 431 996 265 265 596 205 68 49 552 0 673 0 261 552 576 576 114 155 352 121 1 82 342 90 82 261 261 261 117 60 p 89 79 79 575 92 OW Attl' 67 230 384 160 160 227 93 26 57 148 0 280 0 84 148 220 220 32 77 352 426 142 102 22 142 84 84 8428 33 15 p 22 62 62 239 31 OW Prod 30 129 343 120 120 20 42 2 y} 405 2005 28 45 182 182 4 44 411 2 142 U 142 28 28 0 0 0 0 52 52 21 11 Tote 1,853 5,894 6,169 2,851 2,851 2,152 880 371 7,5015 5,443 3,323 7,515 4,096 4096 1,549 2,073 2,436 1,687 792 4625 ,25 , 792 3,323 3,323 3,323 1,679 811 0 1,206 939 939 6,858 968 STM TAz M AUP 1520 137 1521 396 1522 1,418 1523 195 1524 195 1525 406 1526 193 1527 46 1528 39 1529 355 1530 0 1531 821 1532 0 1534 179 1535 355 1536 754 1537 754 1538 84 1539 109 1540 294 1541 90 1542 0 1543 61 1644 250 1545 67 1546 61 1547 179 1548 179 1549 179 1550 92 1551 45 1552 0 1553 66 1554 55 1555 55 1556 402 1557 99 Page 5 of 6 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 f-7 Analysis Year, 2040 Reference Number. 01232 Runld: B006 Build Date: 4/1212005 Land Use: GPA01 Build Time: 9:00:00 PM Network: B006 Modeler. Maros Whiteman lNITM TAZ NO AM No Prod Rd AM IM Prod NW Attr NW prod 00 AtV W Prod OW AtW OW Prod Toth 1558 516 2,498 0 225 724 1,480 678 696 504 322 7,643 1559 1,039 1,310 0 122 817 728 849 867 567 494 6,792 1618 4 24 0 2 2 11 4 4 2 1 54 1713 434 0 0 0 2,140 0 620 670 9,042 1,104 6,010 1714 227 1,564 0 152 86 999 322 322 139 12 3,824 1715 682 0 0 0 604 0 537 543 378 410 3,164 1716 465 29 0 13 604 4 410 415 345 380 2,665 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 1 ? Page 6 of 6 APPENDIX G CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN TRIP GENERATION CHANGE BY TAZ v5 J PUBLISHED REVISED TAZ TOTAL TAZ TOTAL CHANGE 1426 1252 1426 1252 0 1427 9150 1427 9534 384 1428 19916 1428 18856 -1061 1429 6677 1429 6677 0 1430 15114 1430 14652 -462 1431 9822 1431 6824 -2998 1432 9081 1432 8933 -148 1433 4761 1433 4953 193 1434 34096 1434 18081 -16015 1435 1772 1435 1772 0 1436 9273 1436 9052 -221 1437 27 1437 27 0 1438 1484 1438 1487 3 1439 13610 1439 12964 -646 1440 1806 1440 1806 0 1441 8521 1441 8183 -338 1442 1777 1442 1777 0 1443 3682 1443 3682 0 1444 4048 1444 4048 0 1445 3690 1445 3690 0 1446 2617 1446 2617 0 1447 2828 1447 2828 0 1448 2312 1448 2436 124 1449 3392 1449 3589 196 1450 4057 1450 3935 -123 1451 4541 1451 4203 -338 1452 6273 1452 6227 45 1453 5609 1453 5989 379 1464 9870 1454 10211 341 1455 6472 1455 6984 512 1456 9691 1456 9691 0 1457 7118 1457 7171 53 1458 8343 1458 8321 -22 1459 10358 1459 9996 -362 1460 6194 1460 6194 0 1461 5684 1461 5819 135 1462 262 1462 262 0 1463 8552 1463 9152 600 1464 20685 1464 21090 405 1465 6143 1465 6143 0 1466 14671 1466 14671 0 1467 6826 1467 6826 0 1468 415 1468 415 0 1469 10434 1469 10434 0 1470 4957 1470 4957 0 1471 4432 1471 4432 0 1472 7308 1472 7308 0 1473 2132 1473 2132 0 1474 21604 14741 21604 0 1475 3358 1475 3358 0 1476 1769 1476 1769 0 1477 4879 147-7 4879 0 1478 390 1478 390 0 G9 I u 11 11 b5 J PUBLISHED REVISED TAZ TOTAL TAZ TOTAL CHANGE 1534 3323 1534 3323 0 1535 7515 1535 7515 0 1536 4096 1536 4096 0 1537 4096 1537 4096 0 1538 1549 1538 1549 0 1539 2073 1539 2073 0 1540 2436 1540 2436 0 1541 1687 1541 1687 0 1542 11 1542 11 0 1543 792 1543 792 0 1544 4625 1544 4625 0 1545 1225 1545 1225 0 1546 792 1546 792 0 15471 3323 1547 3323 0 1548 3323 1648 3323 0 1549 3323 1549 3323 0 1550 1679 1550 1679 0 1551 811 1551 811 0 1552 0 1652 0 0 1553 1206 1553 1206 0 1554 939 1554 939 0 1555 939 1555 939 0 1556 96B 1556 6858 5890 1557 968 1557 968 0 1558 984 1558 7643 6660 1559 984 1559 6792 5809 1618 54 1618 54 0 1713 6010 6010 1714 3824 3824 1715 3154 3154 1716 2665 2665 U:\UcJobs\ 01200101232\TGcalc\LandUseAitsTGCom are\LuForModell ri Ch Com ere.xls Com are I I G(O APPENDIX H CONSTRAINED ROADWAY SYSTEM ASSUMPTIONS LETTER I.1 41 Corporate Park, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92606 949.660.1994 main 949.660.1911 fax www.urbanxroads.corn January 20, 2005 Mr. Elwood Tescher EIP ASSOCIATES 12301 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 430 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Subject: Roadway Network Assumptions Mr. Tescher: This letter has been prepared to document the roadway system changes for Baseline conditions for the City of Newport Beach General Plan Update model runs. Urban Crossroads, Inc. staff has been reviewing the City of Newport Beach • Memorandum (January 5, 2005) in conjunction with meeting notes from Carleton Waters' January 5 meeting with City of Newport Beach Engineering Department staff, and the email provided on December 29, 2004 by Patricia Temple. There are several roadway system improvements that have been identified as „uncertain that will not be included in the new Currently Adopted General Plan Baseline scenario. We have summarized the findings of this review and are requesting your final decisions on the remaining issues. We have numbered each uncertain segment according to pages 24 and 25 of the Newport Beach Circulation Element for ease of reference. The notes in italics after entries provide additional information from the meeting notes, FROM CITY MEMO fJANUARY 5 2005) N/A -Extension of SR 55 to south of 17t' Street 2-Widening of Coast Highway through Mariner's Mile �3 Mr. Elwood Tescher EIP ASSOCIATES January20, 2004 Page 2 11-Widening of Jamboree Road from Edstbluff/Ford Road to SR 73 5-Grade separation at the MacArthur Boulevard/Jamboree Road intersection (grade separation that "shall be considered"— has been considered via studies. No approval or adoption as a result). 28-19'h Street extension/ bridge 24,25-Bluff Road (Bluff is in except for Min. Alf) 27-171' Street extension 21,22,23-150 Street extension to Coast Highway FROM PATTY TEMPLE'S EMAIL (DECEMBER 29, 2004) 12-Bayview Way extension to MacArthur Boulevard (build 4 lanes) (of interest to TCA as HOV ramp location) 20-Widen Dover Drive from Cliff to Westcliff (widen to 6 lanes) (not in baseline from Cliff to Coast, but shown as Major on current plan) 13-Widen MacArthur Boulevard from San Miguel to Coast Highway (widen to 6 lanes) (Rich and Carleton felt this. should be included) FROM MEETING (JANUARY 5 2005) BETWEEN CARLETON WATERS AND CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STAFF 26-16t' from Dover to Seagull (widen to 4 lanes) (not in, no demand, ok by us) 55-Jamboree & Bayview (intersection improvements associated with Bayview extension to MacArthur) SUMMARY Our recommendation is to eliminate all of these uncertain improvements with the exception of #13 (widen MacArthur Boulevard from San Miguel to Coast Highway to 6 �q Mr. Elwood Tescher EIP ASSOCIATES January 20, 2004 Page 3 lanes). Please provide direction on these uncertain improvements at your earliest convenience. Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide this letter report for your use. Please do not hesitate to give us a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. Carleton Water , Principal CW:MW:mg JN:01232-09 Attachments xc: Ms. Sharon Wood, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Mr. Rich Edmonston, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Ms. Tamara Campbell, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Ms. Harriet Lai Ross, EIP ASSOCIATES Ms. Linda Tatum, EIP ASSOCIATES as '1 APPENDIX I CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS .' iI 1. Bluff & Coast Hw. Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1 1600 1600 10 .006* 10 10 .006* .013 NBR 10 .013 SBL 2 3200 340 .106 270 .084 SBT SBR 1 1600 310 .194* 210 .188* EBL 1 1600 4800 240 5080 .150 1.060* 340 1890 .213* .396 EBR 0 WBL 1 3 1600 4800 10 1110 .006* 10 4240 .006 .883* WBT WBR 1 1600 190 .231 .119 390 .244 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZAIIUN 2. Superior & Placentia I.Ldb L.&Jv Adopted Constrained General Plan LANES CAPACITY 1600 NBR 1 1600 SBR d EBR d 1600 WBT 11.5 3200 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment VOL V/l: 410 .256 1540 .089* 025* 450 .841 10 .006 .0147* 470 310 .194 30 {.019}* 410 .159 70 EBR .047* TOTAL CAPACITY UIILILMUN ,3 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 260 .163* 670 30 .0119 9341 100 .* 10 .006 10 .006* 470 .294 30 460 .219* 210 EBR .088* .iiy U I 3. Superior & Coast Hw. Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 290 570 NBT 1.5 4800 560 .190* 350 .215* NBR 0 60 110 SBL 1.5 190 200 SBT 1.5 4800 160 .073* 380 .121* SBR 2 3200 230 .072 940 .294 EBL 2 3200 1510 .472 430 .134* EBT 3 4800 3450 .719* 1390 .290 EBR d 1600 360 .225 360 .225 WBL 1 1600 50 .031* 210 .131 WBT 4 6400 800 .125 3100 .484* WBR d 1600 190 .119 140 .088 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .039* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1.013 4. Newport & Hospital .993 Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 290 .181 290 .181* NBT 3 4800 1850 .385* 1690 ._352 NBR 1 1600 90 .056 60 .038 SBL 1 1600 150 .094* 40 .025 SBT 3 4800 1250 .260 2200 .458* SBR d 1600 450 .281 260 .163 EBL 2 3200 260 .081 450 .141 EBT 1 1600 380 .238* 310 .194* EBR 1 1600 170 .106 240 .150 WBL 1 1600 120 .075* 220 .138* WBR 32000 3600 .116 2200 .081 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .792 971 2y 5. Newport & Via Lido Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 3 4800 1920 .400* 1270 .265* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 40 .025 SBL 2 3 3200 4800 400 920 .125* 490 1920 .153* .400 SBT SBR 0 0 0 .192 EBT 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 1 1600 20 .013* 30 .019* WBR 3 3200 440 .138 620 .194 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .022* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for WBR ArM TOTAL CAPACITY U1ILILA UUN oao •1�1 6. Newport & 32nd Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 1130 .019* 100 830 .063* NBR d 1600 .019 .019 SBL 1 2 1600 3200 60 830 .038 80 1420 .050 .531* SBT SBR 0 0 100 .291* 280 EBT 0.5 3200 90 470 80 .178* 180 .078* EBR 1 1600 10 .006 20 .013 WBT 1.5 3200 50 .031* 30 .034* WBR f 250 280 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION sty IVU 6, 1 7. Riverside & Coast Hw. Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C 10 10 NBT 11 1600 .'013* .019* NBR d 1600 0 .000 10 .006 SBL 0.5 110 {.069}* 70 {044}* SBT 0.5 1600 10 .075 10 .650 SBR 1 1600 370 .231 510 .319 EBL 1 1600 420 .263 350 .219* EBT 2 3200 2990 .938* 2140 .675 EBR 0 0 10 20 WBL 1 1600 10 .006* 50 .031 WBT 3 4800 1660 .346 3800 .792* WBR 1 1600 50 .031 40 .025 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .049* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 8. Tustin & Coast Hw. 1.026 1.123 Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 10 {.006}* 10 {.006}* 1600 .019 .619 NBR 0 10 10 10 SBT 1 1600 10 .081* .088* SBR 0 0 30 40 EBL 1 1600 10 .006 110 .069* EBT 2 3200 2980 .934* 2060 .647 EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 0 0 0 0 WBT 3 4800 1750 .365 3280 .683* WBR 1 1600 60 .038 90 .056 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION S.(O 1.021 .846 9. MacArthur & Campus Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 140 .088 310 .194* NBT 4 6400 1320 .206* 1420 .222 NBR 1 1600 110 .069 100 .063 SBL 1 1600 250 .156* 150 .094 SBT 4 6400 1100 .172 1300 .203* SBR 1 1600 480 .300 920 .575 EBL 2 3200 840 .263* 540 .169* EBT 3 4800 1040 .217 580 .121 EBR d 1600 180 .113 120 .075 WBL 2 3200 120 .038 150 .047 4800 5260 .108* 1500 .313* WBR f Right Turn Adjustment SBR .026* SBR .372* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 10. MacArthur & Birch 759 1.Zy1 Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 170 .106* NBT 3 4800 1210 .252* 1010 .210 NBR 1 1600 120 .075 70 .044 SBL 1 1600 260 .163* 130 .081 SBT 4 6400 800 .167 1150 .222* SBR 0 0 340 .213 270 EBL 1.5 460 400 EBR 1.5 4800 550 .221* 390 .175* 50 WBL 1 1600 40 .025 130 .081 3200 240 .075* 940 .294* WBWBT f Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 711 .797 11. Von Karman & Campus Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006* NBT 2 3200 790 .247* 640 .200 NBR f 50 40 SBL 1 1600, 40 .025* 170 .106 SBT 2 3200 550 .206 1060 .409* SBR 0 0 110 250 EBL 1 1600 350 .219* 250 .156* EBT 2 3200 730 .228 910 .284 EBR 1 1600 50 .031 30 .019 WBL 1 1600 60 .038 40 .025 WBT 2 3200 420 .166* 1030 .363* WBR 0 0 110 130 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 12. MacArthur & Von Karman ,657 .934 Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 160 .100 50 .031* NBT 3 4800 1390 .290* 870 .181 NBR 1 1600 560 .350 200 .125 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 90 .056 SBT 3 4800 570 .119 1190 .248* SBR 1 1600 190 .119 110 .069 EBL 1 1600 40 .025* 150 .094 EBT 2 3200 160 .050 290 .091* EBR f 40 130 WBL 2 3200 150 .047 860 .269* WBT 1 1600 210 .131* 210 .131 WBR f 50 100 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .060* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION w .544 .639 13. Jamboree & Campus Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 1 4 1600 6400 60 2270 .038 .388* 110 1800 .069* .375 NBR 0 0 210 740 .463 SBL 2 3 3200 4800 640 1560 .200* 360 2720 .113 .640* SBT SBR 0 0 340 .396 350 EBL 2 2 3200 3200 240 320 .075 700 840 .219* .263 EBT EBR f .100* 10 WBL 2 2 3200 3200 750 780 .234* 340 630 .106 .197* WBT WBR 1 1600 80 .244 .050 500 .313 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .116* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILILAIIUN 14. Jamboree & Birch mcc 1.LY1 Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 1 1600 4800 360 22180 .225* .477 120 1800 .075 .385* NBR 0 SBL 1 1600 6400 10 188260 .006 •284* 110 2180 .069* .341 SBR f 30 EBL EBTEBR 1.5 0.5 3200 150 120 .084* 640 .213* 380 WBT 10 1600 .194* 50 160 .137*10 160 WBR Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing AAA TOTAL CAPACITY UIILILAItUN poi 15. Campus & Bristol (N) Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 510 .159 580 .181* NBT 3 4800 3200 .667* 1580 .329 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBT 4 6400 410 .064 1930 .302* SBR 2 3200 300 .094 1240 .388 EL 0 EBT 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 2 3200 310 .097 450 .141 WBT 4 6400 1540 .295* 3110 .506* WBR 0 0 350 130 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .086* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 16. Birch & Bristol (N) 962 1.075 Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 130 041 170 .053* NBT 2 3200 1370 .428* 430 .134 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBL SBT 1.5 6400 150 .063 800 .367* SBR 2.5 250 1550 EBL 0 0 0 0 EBT EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 1.5 420 .263 510 WBT 3.5 8000 1550 .323* 1810 .304* WBR 0 790 .494 110 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .171* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION yto .922 724 17. Campus/Irvine & Bristol (S) Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 5 8000 2400 .360* 1730 .270* NBR 0 0 480 450 .281 SBL 1 3 1600 4800 100 640 .063* .133 330 2050 .206* .427 SBT SBR 0 0 EBL 1.5 5 1330 1620 {.505}* 450 1600 {.278}* EBT 2 3200 .194 .188 WBL WBT 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .011* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .928 .765 18. Birch & Bristol (S) Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK.HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 2.5 6400 560 .150* 260 330 .081 NBR 1.5 400 .103 SBL 2 2 3200 3200 180 380 .056* .119 400 910 .125 .284* SBT SBR 0 0 0 EBT 3.5 8000 1410 .318* 1570 .246* EBR 0 180 120 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY U11ULAMN .DGY rnn 19. Irvine & Mesa Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 90 .056 50 .031* NBT 3 4800 2030 .423* 980 .204 NBR 1 1600 600 .375 180 .113 SBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 SBT ' 3 4800 970 .202 2190 .456* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 210 .131 EBL 1 1600 330 .206* 80 .050* EBT 2 3200 410 .128 80 .025 EBR 1 1600 40 .025 240 .150 WBL 2 3200 150 .047 490 .153 WBT 1 1600 60 .044* 570 .362* WBR 0 0 10 10 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 20. Irvine & University .679 Adopted Constrained General Plan HV/C PM K HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLO NBL 1 1600 200 .125 210 .131* NBT 2 3200 2460 .769* 1080 .338 NBR 1 1600 60 .038 30 .019 SBL 1 1600 90 .056* 40 .025 SBT 2 3200 960 .300 2680 .838* SBR 1 1600 130 .081 420 .263 EBL 1 1600 470 .294* 260 .163* EBT 2 3200 120 .038 30 .009 EBR d 1600 240 .150 140 .088 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBT 1 1600 30 .019* 90 .056* WBR d 1600 20 .013 50 .031 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ��2 1.138 1.188 21. Irvine & Santiago Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 3200 90 1510 .056 .478* 160 1130 .100* .359 NBR 0 20 SBL 1 1600 40 940 .025* 110 11120 .069 SBR d 1600 .025 .075* EBL 0 0 160 {.1001* 60 80 1.0371* .08 EBR d 1600 130 .081 160 .100 WBT 1 1600 60 .050* 10 90 .063* WBR d 1600 160 .100 70 .044 Right Turn Adjustment WBR. .050* EBR. .006* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILILAIWN 22. Irvine & Highland Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 90 1610 .056 80 1320 .050* NBR d 1600 .006* .013 SBL 1 2 1600 3200 20 1150 .013* .359 30 1710 .019 .534* SBT SBR d 1600 20 .013 70 .044 EBL 0 0 80 10 1.0501* 20 20 {0121* .625 EBT EBR 1 d 1600 1600 120 .056 .075 70 .044 WBT 1 1600 20 30 .031* 10 40 20 .031* WBR. d 1600 60 .038 .013 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .013* EBR .007* rnA TOTAL CAPACITY UIILILA1 wn y13 . O.LV 23. Irvine & Dover Adopted Constrained General Plan HOUC PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOL NBL 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 NBT 2 3200 1270 .397* 1040 .325* NBR d 1600 20 .013 20 .013 SBL 1 1600 170 .106* 260 .163* SBT 2 3200 950 .297 1430 .447 SBR d 1600 10 .006 50 .031 EBL 1 1600 90 .056 50 .031* EBT 1 1600 190 .163* 130 .144 EBR 0 0 70 100 WBL 1 1600 20 .013* 40 .025 WBT 1 1600 150 .094 270 ,169* WBR 1 1600 350 .219 290 .181 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .099* WBR .012* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 24. Irvine & Westcliff 778 .700 Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 100 .031 290 .091* NBT 2 3200 920 .288* 630 .197 NBR d 1600 20 .013 10 .006 SBL 2 3200 350 .109* 150 .047 SBT 2 3200 660 .206 820 .256* SBR d 1600 170 .106 500 .313 EBL 2 3200 410 .128* 360 .113* EBT 2 3200 430 .169 560 .238 EBR 0 0 110 200 WBL 1 1600 30 .019 90 .056 WBT 2 3200 410 .144* 860 .306* WBR 0 0 50 120 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .057* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION -Ti q 823 u 25. Dover & Westcliff Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 2 3200 3200 290 460 .091* .144 890 700 .278* .219 NBT NBR 0 D SBT 1 1600 440 .275* 370 .231* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 40 .025 EBL 2 3200 80 .025* 160 .050* EBBT R f 0 660 990 WBL WBT 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 r_rn TOTAL CAPACITY U11L1LA11UN 26. Dover & 16th Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 110 720 .069* 240 1360 .150* NBR d 1600 .013 .038 SBL 1 1600 50 1180 .031 50 100.01* 5 .031 3 SBR d 1600 .019* EBT 0.5 1600 10 .013* 30 .031* EBR d 1600 280 .175 240 .150 WBL 1 1600 40 .025* 40 .025* WBR 1 1600 50 .031 50 .031 Right Turn Adjustment EBR .162* EBR .119* TOTAL CAPACITY UTiLILAi1UN VTi 27. Dover & Coast Hw. Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 20 .013 NBT 1 1600 70 .044* 80 .050* NBR 1 1600 50 .031 30 .019 SBL 3 4800 860 .179* 1080 .225* SBT 1 1600 50 .031 70 .044 SBR 1 1600 80 .050 140 .088 EBL 2 3200 70 .022 70 .022* EBT 3 4800 2820 .596* 2190 .460 EBR 0 0 40 20 WBL 1 1600 60 .038* 110 .069 WBT 3 4800 1790 .373 2880 .600* WBR f 710 1490 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 28. Bayside & Coast Hw. .857 .897 Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2.5 470 550 NBT 0.5 4800 20 .104* 20 .123* NBR 0 10 20 SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 160 .100* SBT 1 1600 20 .013 30 .019 SBR d 1600 70 .044 140 .088 EBL 1 1600 110 .069 150 .094* EBT 3 4800 3130 .652* 2430 .506 EBR 1 1600 510 .319 700 .438 WBL 1 1600 50 .031* 20 .013 WBT 4 6400 1960 .323 3860 .625* WBR 0 0 110 140 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .013* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION yl�a 831 .942 29. MacArthur & Jamboree Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 170 1550 .053 210 .066* NBR 1 1600 .344* 510 .319 SBL 2 3 3200 4800 120 480 .038* 270 1470 .084 .346* SBR .100 EBL EBBT 2 3 3200 4800 580 1840 .181 .392* 230 13770 .072 .285* 60 WBL 2 3 3200 4800 370 910 .116* 930 1550 .291* .323170 WBT WBR .190 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATIUN 30. Jamboree & Bristol (N) y5o .�uu Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3 3200 4800 1230 3370 .384 1070 2460 .334* .513 NBT NBR 0 0 0 .702* SBT 2.5 6400 670 .186 1470 .359* SBR 1.5 520 830 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZAIIUN Y-I1 iuc VJV 31. Bayview Place &'Bristol (S) Adopted Constrained General Plan HVIC NOIC LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 0 0 0 NBT 0 NBR 2 3200 80 .025 360 .113 SBL 0 0 0 SBT 0 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBT 4 6400 3680 .575* 3290 .514* EBR 1 1600 120 .075 10 .006 WBL 0 0 0 WBT 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .025* NBR .113* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .600 .627 32. Jamboree & Bristol (S) Adopted Constrained General Plan HVIC NOIC LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBT 5 8000 2290 .293* 2570 .335* NBR 0 0 50 110 SBL 0 0 0 0 4800 640 .133 1490 .310 SBR 0 EBL 1.5 2140 970 (.515)* EBT 1.5 4800 600 .669* .375 1500 .515 EBR 2 3200 1030 .322 1170 .366 WBL 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .962 .850 33. Jamboree & Bayview Way Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 6400 150 21660 .094 .352* 70 24660 .044 .397* NBR 6 SBL 1 1600 100 .063* 140 .088* SBR 1 1600 1170 2480 .050 .106 EBL 2 3200 1600 40 .013* 90 .028 EBR 1 40 .025 180 .1113* WBL 1 1600 20 .013 50 .031* WBR 1 1600 60 .031* 130 .081 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .044* Multi .179* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATIUN 34. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Unix. .4/b /Ui Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 1 3 1600 4800 60 1620 .038 .338* 50 1960 .031 .408* NBR 1 1600 200 .125 300 .188 SBL 2 3200 90 .028* 380 .119* 1280 1370 SBR 1 1600 .175 .231 EBL EBT 1.5 0.5 3200 500 120 .194* 210 100 .097* EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL WBTWBR 1.5 1.5 4800 270 300f .084* .063 190 110 .063* 90 42 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZA MN 119 044 35. Jamboree & Bison Adopted Constrained General Plan HOC PK HOC LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOL NBT 3 4800 1610 .335* 1900 .396* NBR d 1600 300 .188 180 .113 SBL 2 3200 90 .028* 160 .050* SBT 3 4800 1320 .275 1720 .358 SBR 1 1600 50 .031 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 110 .069* 40 .025* EBR 1 1600 80 .050 10 .006 WBL 2 3200 240 .075* 350 .109* WBR 2 3200 220 .069 200 .063 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 36. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Ford 507 .580 Adopted Constrained General Plan HOUC HOC LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLK NBL 2 3200 380 .119* 390 .122* NBT 3 4800 1700 .402 2000 .498 NBR 0 0 230 390 SBL 2 3200 60 .019 60 .019 SBT 3 4800 1680 .350* 2080 .433* SBR 1 1600 60 .038 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 170 .106 50 .031 EBT 1 1600 210 .131* 120 .075* EBR f 420 350 WBL 1.5 360 280 WBT 1.5 4800 510 .181* 150 .090* WBR 1 1600 80 .050 30 .019 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .781 21D .720 1 11 1 '1 1 37. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 1 3 1600 4800 30 1430 .019 .298* 80 1920 .050 .400* NBR f 120 140 SBL 2 3200 630 1640 .197* 480 2200 .150* SBR 1 1600 .025 .125 EBL 1.5 5 4800 280 50 .088* 90 .028* 19 EEBT BR 1 1600 .031 40 .025 WBT 1 1600 10 .006* 250 .031* WBR f 400 690 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILILAIIUN 38. Jamboree & Santa Barbara all .0 Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 1200 .006 10 1800 .006 NBR 1 1600 .125* .063* SBL 2 3200 400 .125* 270 .084* SBT 3 4800 1280 .267 2010 .419 SBR 1 1600 10 .006 30 .019 EBL 1 1 1600 1600 60 10 .038* 20 10 .013 .019* EBT EBR 0 0 30 .025 20 WBL BT 0.5 3200 80 .028* 420 .159* WBR 1 1600 60 .038 350 .219 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .010* WBR .060* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILILAIIUN . oi+a . / �c 39. Jamboree & Coast Hw. Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL VIC VOL VIC NBL 1 1600 30 .019 30 .019 NBT 2 3200 630 .234* 370 .147* NBR 0 0 120 100 SBL 1 1600 200 .125* 230 .144* SBT 2 3200 280 .088 750 .234 SBR f 930 2140 EBL 3 4800 1280 .267* 890 .185* 6400 2210 .353 1780 .286 EBR 0 50 WBL 2 3200 130 .041 330 .103 WBT 4 6400 1430 .223* 2620 .409* WBR f 100 160 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 40. Santa Cruz & San Joaquin H. Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL VIC VOL VIC NBL 2 3200 90 .028 410 .128 NBT 1 1600 10 .025* 10 .144* NBR 0 0 30 220 SBL 1 1600 20 .013* 10 .006* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR 1 1600 70 .044 60 .038 EBL 1 1600 60 .038 100 .063* EBT 3 4800 430 .134* 370 .116 EBR 0 0 230 .144 190 .119 WBL 1 1600 230 .144* 30 .019 WBT 3 4800 310 .071 490 .108* WBR 0 0 30 30 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .044* SBR .016* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION y�.2. .360 337 41. Santa Rosa & San Joaquin H. Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 10 .019 130 .081* NBR 1 1600 210 .1131* 750 .469 SBL 1 1600 600 120 20 .075* 110 50 .069 SBR 1 1600 .013 .031* EBL 1 3 1600 4800 40 310 .025 .077* 50 6110 .031 .146* EBT EBR 0 0 WBL 2 3200 4800 740 530 .231* 530 2550 .166* .,071 WBR 0 .133 Right Note: Turn Adjustment Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for Multi NBR .310* nn TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZAILUN .007 42. Newport Center & Coast Hw. Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBL 2 3200 30 .009* 310 .097* SBR Of 0 100 840 EBL 2 3 3200 4800 600 1920 .188* .400 360 1760 .113* .367 EBT EBR 0 0 WBT 3 4800 1440 .300* 2030 .423* WBR f 190 160 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZAIIUN .47/ y23 44. Avocado & San Miguel Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 140 .088 60 .038 NBT 1 1600 170 .106* 30 .019* NBR 1 1600 70 .044 620 .388 SBL 1 1600 40 025* 240 .150* SBT 1 1600 50 .031 160 .100 SBR 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 3200 130 .050 610 .250* EBR 0 WBL 2 3200 530 .166 400 .125* WBT 2 3200 520 .231* 630 .213 WBR 0 0 220 50 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .244* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 45. Avocado & Coast Hw. .368 .788 Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 100 .063* 150 .094* NBT 1 1600 40 .025 110 .069 NBR 1 1600 260 .163 150 .094 SBL 1.5 70 .044 340 SBT 0.5 3200 80 .050* 160 .156* SBR 1 1600 30 .019 320 .200 EBL 1 1600 330 .206* 150 .094 EBT 3 4800 1580 .329 1860 .388* EBR d 1600 70 .044 80 .050 WBL 1 1600 150 .094 190 .119* WBT 3 4800 1690 .352* 1780 .371 WBR 1 1600 130 .081 80 .050 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .100* SBR .044* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .771 IN 0 11 1 I 11 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 240 {.117}* 260 .081* NBT NBR 0 1.5 4800 0 320 .117 0 90 .056 0 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 EBL EBT 1 2 1600 3200 10 1140 .006 .356* 10 550 .006* .172 EBR 0 0 0 WBT 2 3200 110 .034 640 .200* WBR 1 1600 190 .119 760 .475 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .275* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZAIIUN 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison .44/J JVL Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 2 3200 850 .266* 280 .088* SBR f 0 10 60 EBT 2 3200 310 .097* 240 .075 EBR 1 1600 150 .094 140 .088 WBL 2 2 3200 3200 60 310 .019* 280 630 .088 .197* WBT WBR .097 nnr TOTAL CAPACITY W ILUAIWN j�5 JOG LVJ 48. MacArthur & Bison Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 340 .106 280 .088* NBT 4 6400 3440 .538* 2720 .425 NBR f 200 130 SBL 2 3200 110 .034* 50 .016 SBT 4 6400 2550 .398 3210 .502* SBR 1 1600 330 .206 430 .269 EBL 2 3200 280 .088* 270 .084* 3200 .109 .056 EBR f 2500 1800 WBL 2 3200 180 .056 220 .069 WBT 2 3200 390 .122* 400 .125* WBR 1 1600 130 .081 60 .038 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 49. MacArthur & Ford/Bonita Cyn 782 .799 Adopted Constrained General Plan HOUR HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLK NBL 2 3200 140 .044 80 .025 NBT 4 6400 19900 .311* 2450 .383* NBR 440 SBL 2 3200 600 .188* 1350 .422* 6400 27100 .423 247700 .386 SBR f EBL 2 3200 40 .013 10 .003 EBT 2 3200 380 .119* 580 .181* EBR 1 1600 80 .050 120 .075 WBL 2 3200 470 .147* 250 .078* WBT 2 3200 730 .228 400 .125 WBR f 1650 780 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION - 2M .765 1.064 50. MacArthur & San Joaquin H. Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 70 1510 .022 30 1920 .009 NBR 1 1600 .006* .013* SBL 2 3200 4800 550 680 .172* .350 750 1970 .234* .410 SBR f 103 520 EBL 2 3 3200 4800 240 300 .075* 940 750 .294* 177 EBT EBR 0 0 40 .071 100 WBL 1 1600 3200 20 650 .013 20 350 .013 .109* WBR f .203* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILI[AIIUN 51. MacArthur & San Miguel Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 1310 .044 170 1470 .053* NBR 1 1600 .194* .294 SBL SBT 2 3 3200 4800 10 1050 .003* .2.19 10 1520 '.003 .317* SBR 1 1600 720 .450 570 .356 EBL 2 2 3200 3200 80 110 .025 940 490 .294* .200 EBT EBR 0 0 60 .053* 150 WBL 2 3200 350 320 .109* 290 330 .091 WBR d 1600 .013 .019* Right Note: Turn Adjustment Assumes Right -Turn SBR .151* Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILILAIIUN TZ7 0151 .iiu 52. MacArthur & Coast Hw. Adopted Constrained General Plan HOUR HOC LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLK NBL 0 0 0 NBT 0' NBR 0 0 0 0 SBL 2 3200 570 .178* 860 .269* 0 SBR f 410 740 EBL 2 3200 830 .259* 660 .206* 4800 1060 .221 1590 .331 EBR 0 WBT 3 4800 1440 .300* 1680 .350* WBR f 850 670 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 53. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bonita Cyn .737 .825 Adopted Constrained General Plan AM HOUR PK HOC LANES CAPACITY L VOL VOL NBL 2 3200 550 .172* 80 .025* NBR 11 1600 380 .238 140 .088 SBL 0 0 0 SBT 0 SBR 0 01 0 0 EBT 2 3200 890 .278* 1080 .338* EBR 1 1600 90 .056 10 .006 WBL 2 3200 560 .175* 340 .106* 3200 1050 .328 1120 .350 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .066* NBR .063* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION a,2 691 .532 54. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Cyn Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 40 .013* 270 .084* NBR 1 1600 240 .150 260 .163 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBT 2 3200 710 180 .222 810 570 .253* .356 EBR 1 1600 .113 WBL 2 3 3200 4800 190 1430 .059 .298* 210 1000 .066* .208 WBR Right Turn Adjustment NBR .137* Multi .182* COC TOTAL CAPACITY u uuLA11UN 55. Spyglass Hill & San Miguel Adopted Constrained General Plan LANES CAPACITY 0 1600 NBR d 1600 SBR 11 3200 EBT 2 EBR d 1600 1600 WBR d Right Turn Adjustment -Mu 1UIfLREEKTIL 40 .050* 160 .100 50 {.050 30 40 .025 50 .031* 340 .106 30 .019 4 40 .138* 30 .019 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILILAIIUN NBR .050* -1�19 auu PM PK HOUR VOL V/C {.031}* 20 180 .113 00 3 .031* 30 .019 .04 530 .16 6* 50 .031 140 .088* 4147 40 .025 NBR .075* I 56. San Miguel & San Joaquin H. Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES ,CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 2 3200 260 .122* 550 .291* NBR 0 0 130 380 SBL 1 1600 70 .044* 150 .094* SBT 2 3200 480 .150 360 .113 SBR 1 1600 420 .263 150 .094 EBL 2 3200 300 .094* 530 .166* 4800 5700 .121 810 .171 EBR 0 10 WBL 2 3200 450 .141 270 .084 4800 11220 .252* 5770 .131* WBR 0 Ri ht Turn Adjustment SBR .009* Noe: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 57. Goldenrod & Coast Hw. .521 n Adopted Constrained General Plan HOUC HO/C LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 1 1600 130 .081* 70 .044* 1600 .025 .025 NBR 0 30 30 SBT 11 1600 10 .100* 10 .081* SBR 0 0 90 70 EBL 1 1600 50 .031* 60 .038 EBT 2 3200 1220 381 2090 .653* EBR d 1600 30 .019 70 .044 WBL 1 1600 40 .025 20 .013* WBT 2 3200 2780 .869* 1870 .584 WBR d 1600 30 019 20 .013 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Sao 1.081 .791 11 11 171 1 1 11 11 11 58. Marguerite & San Joaquin H. Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 0.5 3200 250 .097* 160 .078* NBR 1 1600 30 .019 80 .050 SBL 1 1 1600 1600 60 50 .038 80 540 .050 .056* SBT SBR 0 0 20 .044* EBL 1 2 1600 3200 20 410 .013* 40 950 .025 .297* EBT EBR 1 1600 120 .128 .075 330 .206 WBL 1 1600 40 1090 .025 120 650 .075* WBR d 1600 .056* .031 Note: Note: Assumes Assumes N/S Split Right -Turn Phasing Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZAFIUN 59. Marguerite & Coast Hw. sii Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 1600 150 1000 .094* .119 150 1480 .094* .138 NBR 0 SBL 1 1 1600 1600 70 60 .044 130 180 .081 .125* SBT SBR 0 0 110 .106* EBL 1 1600 00 90 1360 .056* 100 1930 .063 EBR 1 1600 .038 .081* WBL WBT 1 2 1600 3200 40 2030 .025 .641* 110 1630 .069* .522 WBR 0 0 20 40 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZA MN L31 0,J / J V 60. Spyglass H. & San Joaquin H. Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 NBT 1 1600 0 .013* 10 .025* NBR 0 0 20 30 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 40 .025* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR d 1600 270 .169 140 .088 EBL 1 1600 70 .044* 240 .150* fBT 2 3200 620 .194 1000 .313 EBR 1 1600 20 .013 60 .038 WBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 2 3200 1120 .350* 620 .194* WBR d 1600 70 .044 70 .044 Right Turn Adjustment SBR 156* SBR .069* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 61. Poppy & Coast Hw. .601 .463 Adopted Constrained General Plan HOUR PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK C VOL NBL 1 1600 20 .013* 50 .031 NBT 1 1600 10 .019 10 .050* NBR 0 0 20 70 SBL 0 0 50 120 {.075}* SBT 1 1600 10 .044* 10 .088 SBR 0 0 10 10 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 20 .013 EBT 2 3200 1350 .428 1940 .613* EBR 0 0 20 20 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 30 .019* WBT 2 3200 1920 .609* 1680 .531 WBR 0 0 30 20 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION -�132. 672 .757 62. Newport Coast & SR-73 NB Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 2 3200 1290 .403* 850 .250 NBR f SBT 2 3200 430 .134 0 950 .297* SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT EBR 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 5 3200 300 .138* 270 .100* WBR 0.5 140 50 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILILAIIUN 64. Newport Coast & San Joaquin Adopted Constrained General Plan .A41 ✓ AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3 3200 4800 140 1520 .044 .317* 140 710 .044* .148 NBT NBR 0 0 SBT 3 4800 760 .158 1100 .229* SBR 1 1600 130 .081 380 .238 EBL 1 1600 500 .313* 300 .188* EBR 2 3200 90 .028 120 .038 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR EBR .009* Note: A 7/1 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILILAIIUN y33 .Dau 65. Newport Coast & Coast Hw. Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBL 2 3200 300 .094* 790 .247* 1600 .006 .006 SBR f 2000 2200 EBL 1 1600 260 .163* 140 .088* EBT 3 4800 950 .198 1650 .344 EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 3 4800 1450 .302* 1260 .263* WBR f 790 340 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION -i39 .565 604 APPENDIX J CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH CONSTRAINED NETWORK INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS WITH IMPROVEMENTS L 1. Bluff & Coast Hw. Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBR 1600 .013* 10 .013* 1 110 0 10 SBL 2 3200 340 .106* 270 .084 SBT 0.5 3200 10 .097 10 .094* SBR 1.5 300 290 EBL 2 3200 240 .075 340 .106* EBT 5 8000 5080 .636* 1890 .238 EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 WBT 4 6400 1110 .173 4240 .663* WBR 1 1600 190' .119 390 .244 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 2. Superior & Placentia 761 .876 Adopted Constrained General Plan AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 410 .256 260 .163* NBT 2 3200 1540 .481* 670 .209 NBR 1 1600 30 .019 30 .019 SBL 1 1600 40 .025* 70 .044 SBT 2 3200 450 .141 1090 .341* SBR d 1600 10 .006 10 .006 EBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006*' EBT 2 3200 470 .147* 320 .100 EBR d 1600 310 .194 470 .294 WBL 0.5 30 {.0191* 30 WBTWBR 1.5 3200 410 .159 460 .219* Right Turn Adjustment EBR .047* EBR .088* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1 -T3 .719 bi.1 3. Superior & Coast Hw. Adopted Constrained With Improvements HOUR HOUC LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLK 350 NBT 1.5 4800 560 .177* .192* NBR 1 1600 60 .038 110 .069 SBL 1.5 190 200 SBT 1.5 4800 160 .073* 380 .121* SBR 2 3200 230 .072 940 .294 EBL 2 3200 1510 .472* 430 .134* EBT 4 6400 3450 .539 1390 .217 EBR d 1600 360 .225 360 .225 WBL 1 1600 50 .031 210 .131 WBT 5 8000 800 .100* 3100 .388* WBR d 1600 190 .119 140 .088 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .019* SBR .039* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 4. Newport & Hospital 841 874 Adopted Constrained With Improvements HV/C HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 2 3200 290 .091 290 .091* NBT 3 4800 1850 .404* 1690 .365 NBR 0 0 90 60 SBL 1 1600 150 .094* 40 .025 SBT 3 4800 1250 .260 2200 .458* SBR d 1600 450 .281 260 .163 EBL 2 3200 260 .081 450 .141 EBT 1 1600 380 .238* 310 .194* EBR 1 1600 170 .106 240 .150 WBL 1.5 120 .075 220 WBT 1.5 4800 360 .116* 240 .100* WBR 0 10 20 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION -su 852 843 5. Newport & Via Lido Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 3 4800 1920 .400* 1270 40 .265* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 .025 SBL 2 3 3200 4800 400 920 .125* .192 490 1920 .153* .400 SBT SBR 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 1 1600 20 .013* 30 .019* WBR 2 3200 440 .138 620 .194 Right Turn Adjustment Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for WBR WBR .022* Note: ern TOTAL CAPACITY UTILILAIIUN 6. Newport & 32nd .D30 .1r 1 Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 1130 .019* 9 100 830 .063* .175 NB R d 1600 .0100 .019 SBL 1 2 1600 3200 60 830 .038 .291* 80 14280 .050 .531* SBT SBR 0 0 100 EBL BT 0.5 3200 480 .178* 70 180 .078* EBR 1 1600 10 .606 20 .013 WBT 11.5 3200 .031* 30 .034* WBR f 200 220 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing 1�r TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZA MN .DIV .I... I 7. Riverside & Coast Hw. Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 10 20 NBT 1 1600 10 .013* 10 .019* NBR d 1600 0 .000 10 .006 SBT 0.5 110 t.075}* 1600 100 16504}* SBR f 370 510 EBL 2 3200 420 .131 350 .109* 4800 2990 .625* 2140 .450 EBR 0 WBL 1 1600 10 .006* 50 .031 6400 1650 .267 3800 .600* WBR 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 8. Tustin & Coast Hw. .713 .772 Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C NBT 1 1600 10 .019 NBR 0 0 10 SBT 1 1600 0 .081* SBR 0 0 30 EBL 1 1600 10 .006 EBT 3 4800 2980 .623* EBR 0 0 10 WBT 3 4800 1750 .365 WBR 1 1600 60 .038 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .710 T� PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 110 {00006}*, 10 10 .088* 40 110 .069* 2060 .431 10 3280 .683* 90 .056 .846 11 I I I I I u Ll 9. MacArthur & Campus Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 140 1110 .088 310 1100 .194* NBR 1 1600 .069* .063 SBL 1 4 1600 6400 250 1100 .156* .172 150 1300 .094 .203* SBR EBL 2 3 3200 4800 840 1040 .263* .217 540 580 .169* .121 EBT EBR d 1600 180 .113 120 .075 WBL 2 3 3200 4800 120 520 .038 .108* 150 1500 .047 * .313 WBT WBR re TOTAL CAPACITY U11LILA11UN .100 10. MacArthur & Birch Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 1 3 1600 4800 40 1210 .025 .252* 170 1010 .106* .210 NBR 1 1600 120 .075 70 .044 SBL 1 1600 6400 260 .163* 130 1270 .081 222* SBR 04 340 .213 EBT 1.5 4800 550 .221* 390 .175* EBR 0 WBL 1 2 1600 3200 40 2i0 .025 130 .081 .294* WBT WBR .075* 940 60 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILILAiIUN ./.u. 77 11. Von Karman & Campus Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006* NBT 2 3200 790 .247* 640 .200 NBR f 50 40 SBL 1 1600 40 .025* 170 .106 SBT 2 3200 550 .206 1060 .409* SBR 0 0 110 250 EBL 1 1600 350 .219* 250 .156* EBT 2 3200 730 .228 910 .284 EBR 1 1600 50 .031 30 .019 WBL 1 1600 60 .038 40 .025 WBT 2 3200 420 .131* 1030 .322* WBR 1 1600 110 .069 130 .081 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 12. MacArthur & Von Karman .622 .893 Adopted Constrained With Improvements HV/C HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 1 1600 160 .100 50 .031* NBT 3 4800 1390 .290* 870 .181 NBR 1 1600 560 .350 200 .125 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 90 .056 SBT 3 4800 570 .119 1190 .248* SBR 1 1600 190 .119 110 .069 EBL 1 1600 40 .025* 150 .094 EBT 2 3200 160 .050 290 .091* EBR f 40 130 WBL 2 3200 150 .047 860 .269* WBT 1 1600 210 .131* 210 .131 WBR f 50 100 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .060* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION JS .544 .639 13. Jamboree & Campus Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 1 4 1600 6400 60 2270 .038 .355* 110 1800 .069* .281 NBR f 740 SBL 2 3200 640 1340 .200* 360 2350 .113 SBR 1 1600 .213 .219* EBL 3 2 4800 3200 240 320 .050 700 840 .146 .263* EBT EBR f 20 .100* 10 WBL 2 2 3200 3200 750 780 .234* 340 630 .106* .197 WBT WBR f 80 .244 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATIUN .aay Uwo 14. Jamboree & Birch Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 4800 360 2280 .225* .477 120 180Q .075 .385* NBR p SBL SBT 1 4 1600 6400 10 1820 .006 •284* 110 2180 .069* .341 SBR f 860 EBT 0.5 3200 120 .084* 640 .213* EBR f 10 380 WBT 1 1600 60 .194* 160 .137* WBR 0 0 190 10 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILI[AIIUN •/0/ UVI sq 15. Campus & Bristol (N) Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 510 .159 580 .181* NBT 3 4800 3200 .667* 1580 .329 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBL SBT 4.5 11200 410 .063 1930 .283* SBR 2.5 300 1240 0 0 0 EBT 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 2 3200 310 .097 450 .141 WBT 5 8000 1540 .193* 3110 .389* WBR 1 1600 350 .219 130 .081 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .026* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 16. Birch & Bristol (N) .886 .853 Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 130 .041 170 .053* NBT 3 4800 1370 .285* 430 .090 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBL SBT 1.5 6400 150 .063 800 .367* SBR 2.5 250 1550 EBL 0 0 0 EBT 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 1.5 420 510 WBT 3.5 8000 1550 .246* 1810 .290* WBR 1 1600 790 .494 110 .069 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .248* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION -1I0 779 .710 17. Campus/Irvine & Bristol (S) Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 5 8000 2400 .300* 1730 .216 NBR 1 1600 480 .300 450 .281 SBL 1 1600 100 .063* 330 .206 4800 640 .133 2050 .427* SBR 0 EBL 1.5 1330 {.5051* 450 {.2781* EBT 2.5 6400 1900 .505 1330 .278 EBR 2 3200 620 .194 600 .188 WBL 0 0 0, 0 WBT WBR 0 0 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .060* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 18. Birch & Bristol (S) :.: 765 Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 2.5 6400 560 .150* 260 .081 NBR 1.5 400 330 .103 SBL 2 3200 180 .056* 400 .125 SBT 2 3200 380 .119 910 .284* SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 1.5 950 280 EBBT 3.5 8000 14180 .318* 1570 .246* R WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION �11 524 53U 19. Irvine & Mesa Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 90 .056 50 .031* NBT 3 4800 2030 .423* 980 .204 NBR 1 1600 600 375 180 .113 SBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 SBT 3 4800 970 .202 2190 .456* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 210 .131 EBL 1 1600 330 .206* 80 .050* EBT 2 3200 410 .128 80 .025 EBR 1 1600 40 .025 240 .150 WBL 2 3200 150 .047 490 .153 WBT 1 1600 60 .044* 570 .362* WBR 0 0 10 10 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 20. Irvine & University 679 M. Adopted Constrained With Improvements HV/C HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 1 1600 200 .125 210 .131* NBT 3 4800 2460 .513* 1080 .225 NBR 1 1600 60 .038 30 .019 SBL 1 1600 90 .056* 40 .025 SBT 3 4800 960 .200 2680 .558* SBR 1 1600 130 .081 420 .263 EBL 1.5 470 .147* 260 .081* EBT 1.5 4800 120 .075 30 .019 EBR d 1600 240 .150 140 .088 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBT 1 1600 30 .019* 90 .056* WBR d 1600 20 .013 50 .031 Right Turn Adjustment EBR .003* EBR .007* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .738 .833 ' 21. Irvine & Santiago 1 1 1 1 1 Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 3200 90 1510 .056 .478* 160 1120 .100* .359 NBR 8 SBL 1 2 1600 3200 40 940 .025* .294 110 1B20 .069 .569* SBT SBR d 1600 40 .025 120 .075 EBL 0 0 160 {.100)* 60 {.037)* EBR d 1600 130 .081 160 .100 WBT 1 1600 60 .050* 90 70 .063* WBR d 1600 160 .100 .044 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .050* EBR .006* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZAiIUN 22. Irvine & Highland .iuo Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 90 1610 .056 80 1320 .050* NBR d 1600 .006* .013 SBL 1 1600 20 1120 .013* 30 1770 .019 SBR d 1600 .013 .044* EBL 0 0 80 {.050)* 20 20 .012)* {6 EBR d 1600 120 .075 70 .044 WBT 1 1600 PO 30 .031* 10 40 .031* WBR d 1600 60 .038 20 .013 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .013* EBR .007* _ In TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZAiIUN �13 DIV I 23. Irvine & Dover Adopted Constrained With Improvements HOUR HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 NBT 2 3200 1270 .397* 1040 .325* NBR d 1600 20 .013 20 .013 SBL 1 1600 170 .106* 260 .163* SBT 2 3200 950 .297 1430 .447 SBR d 1600 10 .006 50 .031 EBL 1 1600 90 .056 50 .031* EBT 1 1600 190 .163* 130 .144 EBR 0 0 70 100 WBL 1 1600 20 .013* 40 .025 WBT 1 1600 150 .094 270 .169* WBR 1 1600 350 .219 290 .181 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .099* WBR .012* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 24. Irvine & Westcliff 778 700 Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 100 .031 290 .091* NBT 2 3200 920 .288* 630 .197 NBR d 1600 20 .013 10 .006 SBL 2 3200 350 .109* 150 .047 SBT 2 3200 660 .206 820 .256* SBR d 1600 170 .106 500 .313 EBL 2 3200 410 .128* 360 .113* EBT 2 3200 430 .169 560 .238 EBR 0 0 110 200 WBL 1 1600 30 .019 90 .056 WBT 2 3200 410 .144* 860 .306* WBR 0 0 50 120 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .057* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 14 669 .823 25. Dover & Westcliff Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 3200 290 460 .091* .144 NBR 0 SBL 01 1600 0 440 275* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 EBL 2 3200 80 .025* EBT EBR 0 f 0 660 WBL 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .391 26. Dover & 16th Adopted Constrained With Improvements LANES CAPACITY 1600 NBR d SBL 1 1600 1600 SBR d EBL 0.5 EBT 1600 EBR d 1600 WBT 1 1600 WBR 1 1600 Right Turn Adjustment VOL V/U 790 .247 20 .013 031 .369* 1180 30 .019 10 .013* 280 .175 40 .025-A .00 50 .031 EBR .10 TOTAL CAPACITY U1ILILAIIUV J VS 000 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 890 .278* 700 .219 0 370 .026* 160 .050* 990 0 0 rrn PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 240 .150* 1330 416 .038 60 031 1010 .316 * 50 .031 30 .031* 240 .150 40 .025* 50 .031 EBR .119* rAI I 27. Dover & Coast Hw. Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 20 .013 NBT 1 1600 70 .044* 80 .050* NBR 1 1600 50 .031 30 .019 SBL 3 4800 860 .179* 1080 .225* SBT 1 1600 50 .031 70 .044 SBR 1 1600 80 .050 140 .088 EBL 2 3200 70 .022 70 .022* EBT 3 4800 2820 .596* 2190 .460 EBR 0 0 40 20 WBL 1 1600 60 .038* 110 .069 WBT 3 4800 1790 .373 2880 .600* WBR f 710 1490 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 28. Bayside & Coast Hw. .857 .897 Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2.5 470 550 NBT 0.5 4800 20 .104* 20 .123* NBR 0 10 20 SBL 1.5 50 160 SBT 0.5 3200 20 .022* 30 .059* SBR 1 1600 70 .044 140 .088 EBL 1 1600 110 .069 150 .094* EBT 3 4800 3130 .652* 2430 .506 EBR 1 1600 510 .319 700 .438 WBL 1 1600 50 .031* 20 .013 WBT 4 6400 1960 .306 3860 .603* WBR 1 1600 110 .069 140 .088 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes.Right-Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 'D 6 1 11 11 1 29. MacArthur & Jamboree Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 170 1550 .053 344* 210 830 .066* 30 319 NBR 1 1600 .90 510 . SBL 2 3 3200 4800 120 480 .038* .100 270 1460 .084 .346* SBT SBR f 70 EBL 2 4 3200 6400 580 1840 .181* .294 230 1370 .072 .214* EBT EBR f 60 WBL 3 3 4800 4800 370 910 .077 .190* 930 1150 .194* .323 WBT WBR f 170 70 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .036* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILI[AIIUN 30. Jamboree & Bristol (N) Adopted Constrained With Improvements VLV AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3 3200 4800 1230 3370 .384 .702* 1070 2460 .334* .513 NBT NBR SBT 2.5 6400 670 .186 0 1470 .359* SBR 1.5 520 830 EBT 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UIILILAIIUN Tn 31. Bayview Place & Bristol (S) Adopted Constrained With Improvements LANES CAPACITY NBL 0 NBT 0 NBR 2 3200 SBL 0 SBT 0 SBR 0 0 EBT 4 6400 EBR 1 1600 WBL 0 WBT 0 WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 0 0 80 .025 360 .113 0 0 0 0 3680 .575* 3290 .514* 120 .075 10 .006 0 0 0 0 NBR .025* NBR .113* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 32. Jamboree & Bristol (S) .600 .627 Adopted Constrained With Improvements HV/C HV/C LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBT 5 8000 2290 .293* 2570 .335* NBR 0 0 50 110 SBT 3 4800 640 .133 1490 .310 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 2.5 2140 .446* 970 .303 EBT 1.5 6400 600 .375 1500 .469* EBR 2 3200 1030 .322 1170 .366 WBL 0 0 0 WBT 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Z-�g 739 .804 33. Jamboree & Bayview Way Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 6400 150 21690 .094 .352* 70 24680 .044 .397* NBR 6 SBL 1 1600 100 .063* 140 .088* S83 1600 1170 2480 .050 BR 1 .106 EBL EBT 2 1 3200 1600 40 10 .013* .006 90 10 .028 .006* EBR 1 1600 40 .025 180 .113 WBL 1 1600 20 50 .013 50 .031* WBR 1 1600 .031* 130 .081 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .044* Multi .179* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 34. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Univ. 4/b .iu.L Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 1 3 1600 4800 60 1620 .038 .338* 50 1960 .031 .408* NBR 1 1600 200 .125 300 .188 SBL 2 3200 90 1280 .028* 380 1370 .119* SBR 1 1600 .175 .231 EBL EBR 1.5 01 5 00 500 110 210 1110 * 1600 .006* .00600 WBL WBT 1.5 1.5 4800 270 1000 .084* .063 190 .063* WBR f 390 410 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION -r l .044 roof 35. Jamboree & Bison Adopted Constrained With Improvements HOUC PM K HOC LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLR NBT 3 4800 1610 .335* 1900 .396* NBR d 1600 300 .188 180 .113 SBL 2 3200 90 .028* 160 .050* SBT 3 4800 1320 .275 1720 .358 SBR 1 1600 50 .031 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 110 .069* 40 .025* EBR 1 1600 80 .050 10 .006 WBL 2 3200 240 .075* 350 .109* WBR 2 3200 220 .069 200 .063 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 36. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Ford .507 .580 Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 380 .119* 390 .122* NBT 3 4800 1700 .402 2000 .498 NBR 0 0 230 390' SBL 2 3200 60 .019 60 .019 SBT 3 4800 1680 .350* 2080 .433* SBR 1 1600 60 .038 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 170 .106 50 .031 EBT 1 1600 210 .131* 120 .075* EBR f 420 350 WBL 1.5 360 280 WBT 1.5 4800 510 .181* 150 .090* WBR 1 1600 80 .050 30 .019 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION T 20 .781 .720 :1 37. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 4800 30 1120 .019 .298* 80 1940 .050 .400* NBR f SBL 2 3200 630 1640 .197* 480 2200 .150* SBR 1 1600 .025 .125 EBL 1.5 1.5 4800 280 50 .088* 90 30 .028* .019 EBT EBR 1 1600 50 .031 .031 40 .025 WBT 1 1600 10 .006* 250 .031* WBR f 400 690 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing rrn TOTAL CAPACITY UTILILAIIUN 38. Jamboree & Santa Barbara .011 . V� Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 1200 .006 10 1100 .006 NBR 1 1600 .125* .063* SBL 2 3200 400 1210 .125* 270 2030 .084* SBR 1 1600 .006 .019 EBL EBT 1 1 1600 1600 60 10 .038* .025 20 10 .013 .019* EBR 0 0 30 20 WBT 0.WBL 5 3200 10 .028* 420 .159* WBR 1 1600 60 .038 350 .219 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .010* WBR .060* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing >� n TOTAL CAPACITY UIILILA11UN T� l . DIK) 39. Jamboree & Coast Hw. Adopted Constrained With improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 30 .019 NBT 2 3200 630 .234* 370 .147* NBR 0 0 120 100 SBL 1 1600 200 .125* 230 .144* SBT 2 3200 280 .088 750 .234 SBR f 930 2140 EBL 3 4800 1280 .267* 890 .185* EBT 4 6400 2250 .353 1780 .286 EBR 0 0 10 50 WBL 2 3200 130 .041 330 .103 WBT 4 6400 1430 .223* 2620 .409* WBR f 100 160 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ,40. Santa Cruz & San Joaquin H. Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK•HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 90 .028 410 .128 NBT 1 1600 10 .025* 10 .144* NBR 0 0 30 220 SBL 1 1600 20 .013* 10 .006* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR 1 1600 70 044 60 .038 EBL 1 1600 60 .038 100 .063* EBT 3 4800 430 .134* 370 .116 EBR 0 0 230 .144 190 .119 WBL 1 1600 230 .144* 30 .019 WBT 3 4800 310 .071 490 .108* WBR 0 0 30 30 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .044* SBR .016* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION T121 360 337 41. Santa Rosa & San Joaquin H. Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 130 .081* NBR 1 1600 210 .1131* 750 .469 SBL 1 1600 120 .075* 110 .069 SBR 1 1600 20 .013 50 .031* EBL 1 3 1600 4800 40 310 .025 .077* 50 6110 .031 .146* EBT EBR 0 0 60 90 WBL 2 3 3200 4800 740 530 .231* .133 530 2550 .166* .071 WBT WBR 90 Right Note: Turn Adjustment Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for Multi NBR .310* �nn TOTAL CAPACITY U11LILA11UN 42. Newport Center & Coast Hw. J07 Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C 0 0 0 0 NBR 0 0 0 0 3200 30 .009* 310 .097* SBL SBR p f 100 840 EBL 2 3 3200 4800 600 1920 .188* .400 360 1760 .113* .367 EBT EBR 0 0 WBT 3 4800 1440 .300* 2030 .423* WBR f 190 160 rnn TOTAL CAPACITY UTILILAIIUN T23 44. Avocado & San Miguel Adopted Constrained With Improvements HOUC HOC LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLK NBL 1 1600 140 .088 60 .038 NBT 1 1600 170 .106* 30 .019* NBR 1 1600 70 .044 620 .388 SBL 1 1600 40 .025* 240 .150* SBT 1 1600 50 .031 160 .100 SBR 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 EBT 2 3200 130 .050 690 .250* EBR 0 0 30 110 WBL 2 3200 530 .166 400 .125* WBT 2 3200 520 .231* 630 .213 WBR 0 0 220 50 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .244* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 45. Avocado & Coast Hw. 368 .788 Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 100 .063* 150 .094* NBT 1 1600 40 .025 110 .069 NBR 1 1600 260 .163 150 .094 SBL 1.5 70 .044 340 SBT 0.5 3200 80 .050* 160 .156* SBR 1 1600 30 .019 320 .200 EBL 1 1600 330 .206* 150 .094 EBT 3 4800 1580 .329 1860 .388* EBR d 1600 70 .044 80 .050 WBL 1 1600 150 .094 190 .119* WBT 3 4800 1690 .352* 1780 .371 WBR 1 1600 130 .081 80 .050 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .100* SBR .044* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION J 2�{ .771 .801 1 11 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 240 {.117}* 260 .081* NBT 0 1.5 4800 0 320 .117 0 90 .056 NBR SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL EBR 1 1600 3200 10 1140 .006 .356* 10 550 .006* .172 p WBT 2 3200 110 .034 640 .200* WBR 1 1600 190 .119 760 .475 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .275* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZA11uN 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison . 4/ 3 Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 2 3200 850 .266* 280 .088* SBT SBR 0 f 0 10 60 EBT 2 3200 310 .097* 240 .075 EBR 1 1600 150 .094 •140 .088 WBL 2 3200 3200 60 310 .019* 280 630 .088 .197* WBR 0 .097 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION . Jd?- 48. MacArthur & Bison Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL VIC VOL VIC NBL 2 3200 340 .106 280 .088* NBT 4 6400 3440 .538* 2720 .425 'NBR f 200 130 SBL 2 3200 110 .034* 50 .016 SBT 4 6400 2550 .398 3210 .502* SBR 1 1600 330 .206 430 .269 EBL 2 3200 280 .088* 270 .084* EBT 3200 3500 .109 1800 .056 EBR f WBL 2 3200 180 .056 220 .069 WBT 2 3200 390 .122* 400 .125* WBR 1 1600 130 .081 60 .038 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 49. MacArthur & Ford/Bonita Cyn n 799 Adopted Constrained With Improvements HVIC HOIC LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 2 3200 140 .044* 80 .025 NBT 4 6400 1990 311 2450 .383* NBR f 120 440 SBL 3 4800 600 .125 1350 .281* SBT 4 6400 2710 .423* 2470 .386 SBR 1 1600 10 .006 60 .038 EBL 1 1600 40 .025* 10 .006 EBT 3 4800 380 .079 580 .121* EBR 1 1600 80 .050 120 .075 WBL 2 3200 470 .147 250 .078* WBT 2 3200 730 .228* 400 .125 WBR f 1650 780 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION � zc� .720 .863 I t u 1 1 50. MacArthur & San Joaquin H. Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 70 1510 .044 30 1920 .019 NBR 1 1600 .006* .0113* SBL SBT 2 3 3200 4800 550 1680 .172* .350 750 1970 .234* .410 SBR f 1030 520 EBL 3 3 4800 4800 240 300 .050* 940 750 .196* .177 EBT EBR 0 0 40 .071 100 WBL WBT 1 2 1600 3200 20 650 .013 .203* 20 350 .013 .109* WBR f 870 440 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 51. MacArthur & San Miguel .bb4 ooti Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 .044 170 .053* NBR 1 1600 1310 .194* 1470 .294 SBL SBT 2 3 3200 4800 10 1050 .003* .219 10 1520 .003 .317* SBR 1 1600 720 .450 570 .356 EBL 2 3200 80 .025 940 .294* EBT 2 3200 110 .053* 490 .200 EBR 0 0 60 150 WBL 2 3200 350 320 .109* 290 330 .091 WBR d 1600 .013 .0119* Right Turn Adjustment SBR .151* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATIUN 0.51. //V I 52. MacArthur & Coast Hw. Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NB 0 0 0 0 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBL 2 3200 570 .178* 860 .269* 0 SBR f 410 740 EBL 2 3200 830 .259* 660 .206* EBT 4800 1060 .221 1590 .331 EBR 0 WBL 0 0 0 0 WBT 3 4800 1440 .300* 1680 .350* WBR f 850 670 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 53. SR•73 NB Ramps & Bonita Cyn 737 .825 Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 550 .172* 80 .025* NBR 1 1600 380 .238 140 .088 SBL 0 0 0 0 SBT SBR 0 0 0 0 EBT 2 3200 890 .278* 1080 .338* EBR 1 1600 90 .056 10 .006 WBL 2 3200 560 .175* 340 .106* 3200 1050 .328 1120 .350 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .066* NBR .063* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION T20 .691 532 F I, 54. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Cyn Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 40 .013* 270 .084* NBT BR 01 1600 240 .150 260 .163 SBL 0 0 0 0 SBT 0 0 0 0 EBT 2 3200 710 .222 810 .253* EBR 1 1600 180 .113 570 .356 WBL 2 3200 190 .059 210 .066* WBT 3 4800 1430 .298* 1000 .208 WBR Right Turn Adjustment NBR .137* Multi .182* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 55. Spyglass Hill & San Miguel .448 •!)M Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 40 30 (.019)* NBT 1 1600 40 .050* 20 .031 NBR d 1600 160 .100 180 .113 SBL 0 0 50 {.0311* 20 SBT 1 1600 .30 .050 30 .031* SBR 1 1600 40 .025 30 .019 EBL 1 1600 50 .031* 70 .044 330 550 EBR d 1600 .019 .031* WBL 1 1600 100 .063 140 .088* WBT 2 3200 440 .138* 470 .147 WBR d 1600 30 .019 40 .025 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .050* NBR .075* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION � 2q Nu .3iy n 56. San Miguel & San Joaquin H. Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 2 3200 260 .122* 550 .291* NBR 0 0 130 380 SBL 1 1600 70 .044* 150 .094* SBT 2 3200 480 .150 360 .113 SBR 1 1600 420 .263 150 .094 EBL 2 3200 300 .094* 530 .166* 4800 570 .121 810 .171 EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 2 3200 450 .141 270 .084 WBT 3 4800 1120 .252* 570 .131* WBR 0 0 90 60 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .009* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 57. Goldenrod & Coast Hw. .521 Adopted Constrained With Improvements HO/C HOUR/C LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 1 1600 130 .081* 70 .044* 1600 .025 30 .025 NBR 0 30 SBT 11 1600 10 .100* 10 .081* SBR 0 0 90 70 EBL 1 1600 50 .031* 60 .038 EBT 2 3200 1220 .381 2090 .653* EBR d 1600 30 .019 70 .044 WBL 1 1600 40 .025 20 .013* WBT 3 4800 2780 .585* 1870 .394 WBR 0 0 30 20 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL 'CAPACITY UTILIZATION T 30 797 .791 58. Marguerite & San Joaquin H. Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 01 5 260 190 80 NBR 1600 30 .019* .050* SBL 1 1600 1600 60 20 .038 .044* 80 40 .050 .056* SBR 0 EBL EBT 1 2 1600 3200 20 410 .013* :128 40 950 .025 .297* EBR 1 1600 120 .075 330 .206 WBL W33 1 1600 40 1090 .025 120 650 .075* BR d 1600 .056* .031 Note: Note: Assumes'N/S Split Assumes Right -Turn Phasing Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZA MN 59. Marguerite & Coast Hw. 3�� •.JVV Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 1600 150 190 .094* 150 1480 .094* .138 NBBT R 0 .119 SBL 1 1600 1600 70 .044 130 120 .081 .125* SBR 0 160 .106* 80 EBL EBT 1 3 1600 4800 90 1350 .056* .294 100 1990 .063* .442 EBR 0 0 60 130 WBL WBR 1 2 1600 3200 40 2020 .025 .641* 110 1640 .069 .522* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Z031 . b9l . oulr 60. Spyglass H. & San Joaquin H. Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 NBT 1 1600 0 .013* 10 .025* NBR 0 0 20 30 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 40 .025* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR d 1600 270 .169 140 .088 EBL 1 1600 70 .044* 240 .150* EBT 2 3200 620 .194 1000 .313 EBR 1 1600 20 .013 60 .038 WBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 2 3200 1120 .350* 620 .194* WBR d 1600 70 .044 70 .044 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .156* SBR .069* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 61. Poppy & Coast Hw. ,601 .463 Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 20 .013* 50 .031 NBT 1 1600 10 .019 10 .050* NBR 0 0 20 70 SBL 0 0 50 120 {.075)* SBT 1 1600 10 .044* 10 .088 SBR 0 0 10 10 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 20 .013 EBT 2 3200 1350 .428 1940 .613* EBR 0 0 20 20 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 30 .019* WBT 2 3200 1920 .609* 1680 .531 WBR 0 0 30 20 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1'32 672 .757 62. Newport Coast & SR-73 NB Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 2 3200 1290 .403* 800 .250 NBR f 250 SBT 2 3200 430 .134 950 .297* SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL WBR 1.5 3200 300 .138* 270 .100* 0.5 140 50 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 64. Newport Coast & San Joaquin 541 J7I Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 2 3 3200 4800 140 1520 .044 .317* 140 710 .044* .148 NBR 0 0 0 SBT 3 4800 760 .158 1100 .229* SBR 1 1600 130 .081 380 .238 EBL 1 1600 500 .313* 300 .188* EBR 2 3200 90 .028 120 .038 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .009* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATIUN i33 nau 7 65. Newport Coast & Coast Hw. Adopted Constrained With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBL 2 3200 300 .094* 790 .247* SBT 1 1600 .006 .006 SBR 21100 2100 EBL 1 1600 260 .163* 140 .088* EBT 3 4800 950 .198 1650 .344 EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 3 4800 1450 .302* 1260 .263* WBR f 790 340 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ,3y 565 .604 APPENDIX K TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE Study Area Land Use By NBTM Taz Analysis Year. 2040 Runld: BOmin1 Land Use: BOmin1 Network: boOS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/14/2005 Build rime: 12:45:00 PM Modeler. Madle Whiteman NBTMTAZ 1373 Land Use Code 10 Udts TSF UessdpUsn General Commercial Quantity 35.080 78.130 1373 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1373 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1373 25 TSF R & D 1373 1374 26 10 TSF TSF Industrial General Commercial 35.0 35.08080 7 1374 1374 23 24 TSF TSF General Office Medical Office 00 0..00000 0.000 1374 25 TSF R & D 12.0 1374 1375 26 10 TSF TSF Industrial General Commercial 54.46460 0.000 1375 13 TSF Restaurant 11.00 1375 23 TSF General Office '0.000 1375 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1375 25 TSF R & D 18.290 1375 1376 1376 1376 26 10 23 24 TSF TSF TSF TSF Industrial General Commercial General Office Medical Office 56.130 0 12.010 0.000 0.000 1376 25 TSF R & D .510 1376 1377 1377 26 10 23 TSF TSF TSF Industrial General Commercial General Office 80.680 80 0 17.00 0.0000 1377 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1377 25 TSF R & D 1377 1378 26 10 TSF TSF Industrial General Commercial 91.0 91.21210 20.0 1378 1378 23 24 TSF TSF General Office Medical Office 0 0.00000 0.000 1378 25 TSF R & D 31.00 1378 26 TSF Industrial 349.640 1379 23 TSF General Office 1380 23 TSF O General Office 221.800 21.0 1381 23 TSF General Office .30 1382 23 TSF General Office 21 0.330 1383 1384 23 10 TSF TSF General Office General Commercial 25.250 Z� Page 1 of 15 7 Analysis Year. 2040 Runld., BOmin1 Land Use: BOmin1 Network: boOS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/1412005 Build 77me: 12:45:00 PM Modeler. Media Whiteman NTM TAZ IN Use Code Wh DesaMpft 4useUty 1384 23 TSF General Office 67.020 1385 7 ROOM Hotel 349.000 1386 23 TSF General Office 228.210 1387 23 TSF General Office 184.320 1388 10 TSF General Commercial 106.110 1388 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1389 10 TSF General Commercial 46.300 1389 23 TSF General Office 201.780 1390 23 TSF General Office 146A80 1391 23 TSF General Office 97A20 1392 10 TSF General Commercial 17.780 1392 23 TSF General Office 160.590 1393 10 TSF General Commercial 58.120 1395 7 ROOM Hotel 164.000 1395 16 TSF General Commercial 120.000 1395 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1396 23 TSF General Office 591.600 1397 23 TSF General Office 165.040 1398 23 TSF General Office 82.583 1399 23 TSF General Office 108.520 1400 23 TSF General OfIce 62.080 1401 24 TSF Medical Office 86.090 1402 23 TSF General Office 45.794 1403 7 ROOM Hotel 471.000 1403 10 TSF General Commercial 16.000 1403 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1403 23 TSF General Office 393.050 1403 37 TSF Youth Clr/Service 10.900 1404 23 TSF General Office 434.953 1405 10 TSF General Commercial 129.300 1405 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1405 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1405 23 TSF General Office 688.160 1406 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1406 26 TSF Industrial 430,000 1407 10 TSF General Commercial 31.720 1407 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 1.560 1407 23 TSF General Office 124.990 1407 24 TSF Medical Office 3.770 1408 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 145.000 Thursday, April 14. 2005 M Page 2 of 15 ' ' Analysis Year: Runld: Land Use., Network: 2040 BOminl BOmin1 boOS01 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4114/2005 Build Time: 12:45:00 PM Modeler. Marlie Whiteman ' DesCdption Quant9 WIMTAZ Land Use Cade Units 300.000 1409 7 10 ROOM TSF Hotel General Commercial 35.000 1409 .000 1409 13 TSF Restaurant 0 1409 23 TSF General Office663.330 .0 ' 1409 38 ACRE Park 81.380 1410 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) t 1411 10 TSF General Commercial 1.690 15.690 1411 40 ACRE Golf Course 60.000 1412 1 DU Res-low(SFD) ' 1413 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 1413 18 TSF Health Club 60.000 67.950 1413 23 TSF General Office ' 1413 39 ACRE Regional Park 45.950 53.000 158.730 1415 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 8.000 1415 36 TSF Church ' 156.000 1416 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 59.000 1417 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) ' 1418 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 73.000 1419 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 465.000 1420 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 116.000 160.000 ' 1421 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 1421 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 52.000 1421 3 DU Apartment P 174.800 174.370 ' 1421 10 TSF General Commercial 4.000 1421 13 TSF Restaurant 3.660 1421 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 243,220 1421 23 TSF General Office 1421 � 24 TSF Medical Office ' 1421 29 STU Elementary/Pdvate School 36.000 635.240 1421 32 TSF Library 5.000 1422 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 266.000 218.230 ' 1423 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 14.000 1423 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 4.000 1423 38 ACRE Park Apartment 1,44 1424 3 DU 1425 10 TSF General Commercial 1.7300 .810 1425 23 TSF General Office 12 4..100 1425 36 TSF Church 1 19.000 1426 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) ' 1426 36 TSF Church 40.000 Page 3 of 15 Thursday, April 14, 2005 Y Analysts Year. 2040 Runld: BOmin1 Land Use: BOmin1 Network., bo0501 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4114/2005 Build Time: 12:45:00 PM Modeler. Media Whiteman NBTM TAZ Land Bse Code Will Desorlpm qumm 1427 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 550.000 1427 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1427 10 TSF General Commercial 21.390 1427 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1427 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 0.000 1427 23 TSF General Office 29.630 1427 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1427 30 STU Junior/High School 2,184.000 1427 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 68.000 1427 36 TSF Church 59.680 1427 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 13,370 1427 38 ACRE Park 0.400 1428 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 257.000 1428 3 DU Apartment 152.000 1428 7 ROOM Hotel 140.000 1428 10 TSF General Commercial 332.520 1428 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1428 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1428 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 0.000 1428 19 CRT Tennis Club 0.000 1428 20 SLIP Marine 130,000 1428 23 TSF General Office 75.090 1428 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1428 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 22.310 1429 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 656,000 1429 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 13.000 1429 3 DU Apartment 59.000 1429 21 SEAT Theater 90.000 1429 29 STU Elementary/Private School 436.000 1429 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 0.900 1429 38 ACRE Park 3.030 1430 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 30.000 1430 6 ROOM Motel 0.000 1430 7 ROOM Hotel 64.000 1430 10 TSF General Commercial 275.980 1430 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1430 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1430 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 0.000 1430 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1430 23 TSF General Office 283.820 Thursday, April 14, 2005 t / (_ Page 4 of 15 Analysis Year., Runld., Land Use: Network: 2040 BOmin1 BOmin1 boOS01 Reference Number.,01232 Build Date: 4/14/2005 Build Time: 12:45:00 PM Modeler. Marlie Whiteman WTMTAZ Land Use Cods Units Desemptbn Quantity 1430 33 TSF Post Office 9.900 1431 3 DU Apartment 36.000 1431 10 TSF General Commercial 149.910 1431 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1431 17 TSF Yacht Club 0.000 1431 23 TSF General Office 77.650 1432 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 205.000 1432 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 379.000 1432 3 DU Apartment 8.000 1432 6 ROOM Motel 0.000 1432 7 ROOM Hotel 53.000 1432 10 TSF General Commercial 66.380 1432 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1432 23 TSF General Office 135.730 1432 24 TSF Medical Office 11.290 1433 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 98.000 1433 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1433 3 DU Apartment 405.000 1433 23 TSF General Office 67.160 1433 24 TSF Medical Office 24.460 1433 26 TSF Industrial 213.063 1433 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 270.000 1434 23 TSF General Office 9.660 1434 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 7.770 1434 34 BED Hospital 822.000 1435 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 68.000 1435 2 DU Res -Medium (SPA) 28.000 1435 10 TSF Generai Commercial 10.800 1435 13 TSF Restaurant BA00 1435 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 2.70D 1436 2 DU Res -Medium (SPA) 0.000 1436 3 Du Apartment 1,370.000 1436 4 DU Elderly Residential 0.000 1436 10 TSF General Commercial 3.500 1436 24 TSF Medical Office 39.600 1436 26 TSF Industrial 48.002 1436 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 169.000 1436 38 ACRE Park 0.000 1437 26 TSF Industrial 5.000 1438 23 TSF General Office 57.400 Thursday, April 14, 2005 V-f Page 5 of 15 Analysis Year. 2040 Runld..- BOmin1 Land Use: 80min1 Network: boOS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/14/2005 Build71mer 12:46:00 PM ' Modeler. Marlle Whiteman IITM TAZ Lend Uee Code No 1eee11pUm @e111t" 1438 26 TSF Industrial 8.330 1438 27 TSF Mint-StoragelWarehouse 0.000 1438 29 STU Elementary/Private School 622.000 1439 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1439 3 DU Apartment 723.000 1439 5 DU Mobile Home 0.000 1439 10 TSF General Commercial 50.910 1439 23 TSF General Office 367.810 1439 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1439 25 TSF R & D 0.00D 1439 26 TSF Industrial 230.062 1439 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 0.000 1440 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 281.000 1441 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 462.000 1441 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1441 3 DU Apartment 273.000 1441 6, ROOM Motel 145.000 1441 10 TSF General Commercial 18.105 1441 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1441 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1442 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 43.000 1442 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 214.000 1442 38 ACRE Park 6.790 1443 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 125.000 1443 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 350.000 1443 3 DU Apartment 54.000 1443 38 ACRE Park 6.500 1444 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 94.000 1444 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 498.500 1445 1 OU Res -Low (SFD) 139.000 1445 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 509.000 1446 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 124.000 1446 2 OU Res -Medium (SFA) 239.000 1446 38 ACRE Park 2.690 1447 1 OU Res -Low (SFD) 88.000 1447 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 415.000 1448 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 87.000 1448 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 103.000 1448 10 TSF General Commercial 26.170 1448 13 TSF Restaurant 2.240 Thursday, April 14, 2005 KC9 Page 6 of 15 I I1 II ' 1 1 Analysis Year. Runld: Land Use: Network: 2040 BOmin1 SOmin1 boOS01 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/14/2005 Build Time: 12:45:00 PM Modeler. Marne Whiteman WIM TAZ Land Use Code Urns Description QUanUW 12.190 1448 23 TSF General Office 0.990 1448 24 TSF Medical Office 1449 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 95.000 1449 10 TSF General Commercial 74.900 0.000 1449 13 TSF Restaurant 1449 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 20.020 1449 23 TSF General Office 1450 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 159.000 3.000 1450 3 DU Apartment 16.000 1450 6 ROOM Motel 1450 10 TSF General Commercial 67.590 0.000 1450 13 TSF Restaurant 35.750 1450 23 TSF General Office 1451 1 DU Res -Low (SFD), 22.000 1451 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 110.000 5.000 1451 3 DU Apartment 3.000 1451 6 ROOM Motel 22.000 1451 7 ROOM Hotel 1451 10 TSF General Commercial 82.750 0.000 1451 13 TSF Restaurant 1451 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1451 23 TSF General Office 8.000 1452 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 12.000 1452 10 TSF General Commercial 130.510 0.000 1452 13 TSF Restaurant 1452 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 90.220 1452 23 TSF General Office 6.000 1452 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 1453 10 TSF General Commercial 111.580 0.000 1453 13 TSF Restaurant 685.000 1453 21 SEAT Theater 119.900 1453 23 TSF General Office D.DDD 1453 24 TSF Medical Office 26.010 1453 36 TSF Church 1454 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 0.000 1454 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 152.000 1454 10 TSF General Commercial 53.270 1454 11 ACRE Comm./Recreation 0.850 0.000 1454 13 TSF Restaurant 1454 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 Page 7 of 15 Thursday, April 14, 2005 1/A Analysts Year: 2040 Runld: BOmin1 Land Use: BOmin1 Network: b0OS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4114/2005 Build Time: 12:45:00 PM Modeler. Madle Whiteman 18TMTAZ l;MUNCode Odle OeeCIPUN QaEmy 1464 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1454 37 TSF Youth CtrlService 4.650 1455 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 3.000 1455 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 403.000 1455 10 TSF General Commercial 108.2.20 1455 13 TSF Restaurant 9.200 1455 23 TSF General Office 1.000 1455 26 TSF Industrial 38.0D0 1456 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 797.000 1456 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 98.000 1456 3 DU Apartment 26.000 1457 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 218,000 1457 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 476.000 1457 3 DU Apartment 103.000 1457 5 DU Mobile Home 58.000 1457 6 ROOM Motel 26.000 1457 10 TSF General Commercial 12.540 1457 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 1.250 1457 20 SLIP Marna 58,000 1457 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 13.440 1457 29 STU Elementary/Private School 389.000 1457 36 TSF Church 10.050 1457 37 TSF Youth Ct/Service 17AOD 1457 38 ACRE Park 1.200 1458 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 366.000 1458 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 684.00D 1458 3 DU Apartment 173.000 1458 10 TSF General Commercial 20.810 1458 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1458 20 SLIP Marna 14.000 1458 23 TSF General011ce 0.000 1458 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1458 32 TSF Library 4.800 1458 36 TSF Church 2.000 1459 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 9.000 1459 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 131.000 1459 3 DU Apartment 69.000 1459 7 ROOM Hotel 34.000 1459 10 TSF General Commercial 196.530 1459 11 ACRE Comm.lRecreatlon 4,250 Thursday, April 14, 2005 /, C) Page 8 of 15 Analysts Year: Runld: Land Use: Network: 2040 BOmIn1 BOmin1 boOS01 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/14/2005 Build rime: 12:45:00 PM Modeler. Media Whiteman NITM TAZ 1459 1459 1459 Land Use Cods 13 15 17 Udts TSF TSF TSF Dasoripmn Restaurant Fast Food Restaurant Yacht Club Quantity 0.00 0.000 0.000 30.000 1459 1459 1459 1459 1460 1460 1460 1460 21 23 33 37 1 2 3 19 SEAT TSF TSF TSF DU DU DU CRT Theater General Office Post Office Youth Ctr/Service Res -Low (SFD) SFA Res -Medium () Apartment Tennis Club 6 0.000 1.700 4.0 677.000 151.000 51.000 .0 0 .83830 1460 1461 1461 1481 1461 1461 38 1 2 10 13 17 ACRE DU DU TSF TSF TSF Park Res-Low(SFD) Res-Medlum (SFA) General Commercial Restaurant Yacht Club 2.000 263.000 0 4.000 2 8.290 352.000 1461 1461 1461 20 23 26 SLIP TSF TSF Marina General Office Industrial 12.000 5.0 0.78780 1461 1462 38 1 ACRE DU Park Res -Low (SFD) 32.000 1463 1463 1463 1463 1464 1464 3 10 13 16 1 2 DU TSF TSF TSF DU DU Apartment General Commercial Restaurant Auto Dealer/Sales Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) 112.0 192.45 0 2.0 17.42420 .000 3,119 .000 4.000 1464 1464 1464 1464 1464 1464 1464 6 10 13 15 23 24 33 ROOM TSF TSF TSF TSF TSF TSF Motel General Commercial Restaurant Fast Food Restaurant General Office Medical Office Post Office 0 16..550 5.430 18.370 2.0 1.90900 3.000 1464 36 TSF Church 1.620 1464 1465 1465 1465 38 5 10 13 ACRE DU TSF TSF Park Mobile Home General Commercial Restaurant 3.0 6060.63630 18.190 Page 9 of 15 Thursday, April 14, 2005 ) j" J Analysts Year. 2040 Runldr BOmin1 Land Use: BOmin1 Network: boOS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/14/2005 Build Time: 12:45:00 PM Modeler. Media Whiteman NIM TAZ Land On Coda No k8c"Pu QUM" 1465 20 SLIP Marina 218.000 1465 23 TSF GeneralOMice 30.310 1466 2 DU Res -Medium (SPA) 212.000 1466 7 ROOM Hotel 754.000 1466 13 TSF Restaurant 83.930 1466 19 CRT Tennis Club 16.000 1466 22 ACRE Newport Dunes 64.000 1466 23 TSF General Office 6.000 1466 37 TSF Youth CidService 2.690 1466 40 ACRE Golf Course 2.000 1467 3 DU Apartment 1,185.000 1468 29, STU Elementary/Private School 320.000 1469 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 792.000 1469 3 DU Apartment 225.000 1469 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 6,450 1469 29 STU Elementary/Private School 294.000 1469 30 STU Junior/High School 1,801.000 1469 36 TSF Church 34.960 1469 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 34.970 1469 38 ACRE Park 8.000 1470 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 145.000 1470 10 TSF General Commercial 78.230 1470 19 CRT Tennis Club 19.000 1470 23 TSF General Office 11.660 1471 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 460.000 1471 38 ACRE Park 2.000 1472 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 209.750 1473 3 DU Apartment 300.000 1474 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 1.686.000 1474 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 208,000 1474 3 DU Apartment 736.000 1474 10 TSF General Commercial 35.000 1474 13 TSF Restaurant 6.350 1474 38 ACRE Park 14.230 1475 25 TSF R & D 81,730 1475 27 TSF MInlSlorage/Warehouse 196.420 1475 29 STU Elementary/Private School 62.000 1475 33 TSF Post Office 55.200 1475 36 TSF Church 100.280 1476 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 227.000 1 I 11 11 Thursday, April 14, 2005 `/ 12 Page 10 of 15 F Analysis Year. 2040 Runld: BOmin1 Land Use: BOmin1 Network: boOS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/14/2005 Build Time: 12A5:00 PM Modeler: Marlie Whiteman ETMTAZ land Use Code We Uasoripuan Quan ny 1477 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 500.000 1478 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 50.000 1479 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 101.000 1479 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 54.000 1480 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 144.000 1480 3 DU Apartment 80.000 1481 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 101.000 1481 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 182.000 1481 10 TSF General Commercial 2.300 1482 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 142.000 1482 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 43.000 1482 3 DU Apartment 73.000 1482 40 ACRE Golf Course 181.200 1483 1 DU Res -Law (SFD) 21.000 1484 7 ROOM Hotel 425.000 1484 10 TSF General Commercial 21.700 1484 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1484 23 TSF General Office 955.030 1485 9 TSF Regional Commercial 1,633.840 1485 10 TSF General Commercial 0.000 1485 21 SEAT Theater 1,700.000 1486 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1486 3 DU Apartment 245.000 1486 10 TSF General Commercial 125.680 1486 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1486 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 0.000 1486 23 TSF General Office 881.000 1486 31 TSF Cultural/Learning Center 40.000 1487 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 69.000 1487 7 ROOM Hotel 611.000 1487 10 TSF General Commercial 7.500 1487 19 CRT Tennis Club 22.000, 1487 23 TSF General Office 11.630 1487 40 ACRE Golf Course 99.400 1488 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 122.000 1489 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 228.000 1489 10 TSF General Commercial 5.000 1490 23 TSF General Office 115.800 1491 23 TSF General Office 468.640 1491 24 TSF Medical Office 351.950 Thursday, April 14, 2005 u13 Page 11 of 15 Analysts Year. 2040 Runld: SOmin1 Land Use; BOmin1 Network: boOS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/14/2005 Build Time: 12:45:00 PM ' Modeler Marlie Whiteman NTM TAZ LIM UN coos ulna k8cliyift WNW 1492 10 TSF General Commercial 38.100 1492 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1492 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1492 21 SEAT Theater 2,150.000 1492 23 TSF General Office 442.110 1493 23 TSF General Office 409.510 1494 10 TSF General Commercial 105.000 1494 32 TSF Library 65.000 1495 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 416.000 1495 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 37.000 1495 10 TSF General Commercial 2.380 1495 17 TSF Yacht Club 62.020 1495 20 SLIP Marina 283.000 1495 23 TSF General Office 186.530 1495 38 ACRE Park 6.530 1496 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 73.000 1496 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 256.000 1496 3 DU Apartment 152.000 1496 29 STU Elementary/Pdvale School 12.030 1497 1 DU Res-LoW (SFD) 143.000 1497 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 214.000 1497 3 DU Apartment 48.000 1498 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 234.000 1498 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1498 3 DU Apartment 83.000 1498 10 TSF General Commercial 52,132 1498 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1496 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1498 38 ACRE Park 3.600 1499 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 144.000 1500 1 DU Res -Law (SFD) 178,000 1500 38 ACRE Park 1.030 1501 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 849.000 1501 3 DU Apartment 74.000 1501 10 TSF General Commercial 99.656 1501 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1501 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1501 21 SEAT Theater 500.000 1501 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1501 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1 I Thursday, April 14, 2005 S / �t' Page 12 of 15 11 Analysis Year: Runld: Lend Use: Network: 2040 BOminl BOminl boOS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date:4/14/2005 Build Time: 12:45:00 PM Modeler. Marlle Whiteman DescriM QHNM WTM TAZ land Use Bode M 0.000 1501 38 ACRE Park .000 170. 1502 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 000 1502 3 DU Apartment 10 TSF General Commercial 98323 1502 0.000 0.000 1502 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1502 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1502 23 TSF General Office .000 1502 24 TSF Medical Office 2.000 1503 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 28.000 . 1503 3 DU 39396.7474 1503 10 TSF General Commercial 0.000 1503 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1503 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1503 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1503 23 TSF General Office .000 1503 24 TSF Medical Office 2.000 539 1504 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 00 1504 3 DU Apartment 55.O91 .3 1504 10 TSF General Commercial 0.000 1504 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1504 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1504 18 TSF Health Club O.O 1504 23 TSF General Of0ce 0.000 1504 24 TSF Medical Office 2.340 1504 36 TSF Church 4300 831.0 1505 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 000 .766 1505 3 DU Apartment 40.000 1505 10 TSF General Commercial 0.000 1505 13 TSF Restaurant 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1505 0.000 1505 23 TSF General Office 3.800 1505 32 TSF Library 5.000 1505 33 TSF Post Office .000 360.000 1506 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 1506 6. 000 1506 3 DU Apartment 10 TSF General Commercial 15 19.515 1506 879 1506 23 TSF General Office2.000 140.78 1507 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) .0 1507 38 ACRE Park Page 13 of 15 Thursday, April 14, 2005 Analysts Year. 2040 Runid: BOmin1 Land Use., BOminl Network., boOS01 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date., 4/14/2005 Build 77me., 12:45:00 PM Modeler. Marie Whiteman NBTMTAZ UN UN Cade OM Imlipum 4uNt" 1508 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 228.000 1508 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 120.000 1508 3 DU Apartment 120.000 1508 29 STU Elementary/Private School 790.000 1508 37 TSF Youth Clr/Service 5.850 1510 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 200.000 1511 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 20.000 1511 10' TSF General Commercial 70.790 1512 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 246,000 1513 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 348,000 1513 4 DU Elderly Residential 100.000 1513 18 TSF Health Club 1.000 1513 37 TSF Youth CtdService 24.070 1514 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 41.000 1515 3 DU Apartment 388.000 1515 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 8.400 1516 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 67.000 1516 4 DU Elderly Residential 100.000 1516 36 TSF Church 88.670 1517 3 DU Apartment 160.000 1517 10 TSF General Commercial' 71.080 1517 23 TSF General Office 9.750 1517 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 13.390 1517 29 STU Elementary/Private School 406.000 1517 30 STU Junior/High School 780.000 1517 36 TSF Church 31.360 1518 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 441.000 1518 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 67.000 1518 38 ACRE Park 0.950 1519 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 475.000 1519 38 ACRE Park 14.230 1520 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 207,000 1521 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 580.000 1521 29 STU Elementary/Private School 498.000 1521 38 ACRE Park 9.730 1522 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 119,000 1522 2 DU lies -Medium (SFA) 120,000 1522 10 TSF General Commercial 96.540 1522 23 TSF General Of re 12.900 1525 3 DU Apartment 1,100.000 Thursday, April 14, 2005 l / i Page 14 of 15 Analysts Year: Run/d: Land Use: Network., 2040 BOmin1 BOmin1 boOS01 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/14/2005 Build Time: 12:45:00 PM Modeler. Marlie Whiteman NTM TAZ 1526 1527 1528 1528 1556 Land Use Code 1 2 28 36 3 Untis DU DU TSF TSF DU DeseripUsn Res -Low (SFD) Res -Medium (SFA) Pre-school/DaY Care Church Apartment Quantity 290.000 125.000 .0 26.010 0.000 7.000 1558 1558 1558 1559 1559 1559 1559 1559 1618 1713 1714 1715 1715 1716 1716 3 23 26 1 3 10 23 26 1 34 3 10 24 24 35 DU TSF TSF DU DU TSF TSF TSF DU BED DU TSF TSF TSF BEDS Apartment General Office Industrial Res -Low (SFD) Apartment General Commercial General Office Industrial Res -Low (SFD) Hospital Apartment General Commercial Medical Office Medical Office Nursing/Conv. Home 0.000 0.000 .000 7.000 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 .000 443.000 617.0 .76 0 142.430 142.430 95.000 K17 15 of 15 U5 Revised Ado ted True Minimum LU Code Quantity Occupanc Rate LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate 1421 32 5.24 1 32 5.24 1 1422 1 490 0.95 1 490 0.95 1423 1 Z66 0.95 1 266 0.95 1423 37 18.23 1 37 18.23 1 1423 38 4 1 38 4 1 1424 3 1445 0.95 3 1445 0.95 1373 10 35.08 0.9 10 35.08 0.9 1373 23 78.13 0.9 23 78.13 0.9 1373 24 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1373 25 0 019 25 0 0.9 1373 26 12.19 0.9 26 12.19 0.9 1374 10 35.08 0.9 10 35.08 0.9 1374 23 78.13 0.9 23 78.13 0.9 1374 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1374 251 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1374 261 12.19 0.9 26 12,19 0.9 1375 101 54.46 0.9 10 54.46 0.9 1375 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1375 231 117.2 0.9 23 117.2 0.9 1375 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1375 261 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1375 261 18.29 0.9 26 18.29 0.9 1376 101 56.1$ 0.9 10 56.13 0.9 1376 231 125.01 0.9 23 125.01 0.9 1376 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1376 25 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1376 26 19,51 0.9 26 19.51 0.9 1377 10 80.68 0.9 10 80.68 0.9 1377 23 179.7 0.9 23 179.7 0.9 1377 24 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1377 25 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1377 26 28.05 0.9 26 28.05 0.9 1378 101 91.21 0.9 10 91.21 0.9 1378 23 203.14 0.9 23 203.14 0.9 1378 24 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1378 25 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1378 26 31.7 0.9 26 31.7 0.9 1425 10 1.73 0:9 10 1.73 0.9 1425 23 128.81 0.9 23 128.81 0.9 1425 36 24.1 1 36 24.1 1 1426 1 119 0.95 1 119 0.95 1426 36 40 1 36 40 1 1427 1 550 0.95 1 550 0.95 1427 2 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1427 10 21.39 0.9 10 21.39 0.9 1427 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1427 16 0 1 16 0 1 1427 23 29.63 0.9 23 29.63 0.9 1427 24 , 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1427 30 2184 1 30 2184 1 1427 35 68 1 35 68 1 1427 36 59.68 1 36 59.68 1 1427 37 13.37 11 37 13.37 1 Lq II h1 True Minimum LU_Code' 38 1 3 7 90 13 15 16 19 20 23 24 37 3 1 1 2 1 2 3 21 29 37 38 28 36 1 6 7 10 13 15 16 18 23 33 3 10 13 17 23 1 2 3 6 7 10 13 23 24 Revised Adopted Quantity 0.4 257 152 140 332.52 0 0 0 0 0 75.09 0 22.31 1100 290 6 125 656 13 59 90 436 0.9 3.03 7.32 26.01 30 0 64 275.98 0 0 0 0 283.82 9.9 36 149.91 0 0 77.65 205 379 8 0 53 66.38 0 135.73 11.29 1 98 2 3 142 Occupanc Rate 1 LU_Code 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 1 1 1 0.9 --- 1 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1 1 0.9 1 0.95 0.9 0.9 1 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.95 0 0.95 0.95 38 1 3 10 13 15 16 19 20 23 37 3 1 1 2 1 2 3 21 29 37 38 28 36 1 6 7 10 13 15 16 18 23 33 3 10 13 17 23 1 2 3 7 10 13 23 24 Quantity 0 4 257 152 140 332.52 0 0 0 0 75.09 22.31' 1100 290 6 125 656 13 59 90 409 . .9 3.03 7.32 26.01 30 0 64 275.98 0 0 0 0 283.82 9.9 36 149.91 0 0 77.65 205 379 B 66.38 66.38 135.73 11.29 1 98 2 3 405 Occu ancyRate 1 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 1 1 1 0.9 1 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1 1 0.9 1 0.95 0.9 0.9 1 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0 0.9 O.9 0.9 0.95 0 0.95 0.95 1427 1428 1428 1428 1428 1428 1428 1428 1428 142E 1428 1428 1 8 1525 526 1526 618 1527 1429 1429 1429 1429 1429 1429 1429 1528 1526 1430 1430 1430 1430 1430 1430 1430 1430 1430 1430 1431 1431 1431 1431 1431 1432 1432 1432 1432 1432 1432 1432 1432 1432 1433 1433 1433 Revised Ado ted True Minimum LU Code Quantity Occupanc Rate LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate 1433 23 67.16 0.9 23 67.16 0:9 1433 24 24A6 0.9 24 24.46 0.9 1433 26 298.12 0.9 26 213.063 0.9 1433 35 270 1 35 270 1 1715 24 142.43 0.9 24 142.43 0.9 1714 3 673 0.95 3 673 0.95 1715 101 17.76 0.9 10 17.76, 0.9 1434 231 9.66 0.9 23 9.66 0.9 1716 241 142.43 0.9 24 142.43 0.9 1434 281 7.77 1 28 7.77 1 1434 341 822 1 34 822 1 1716 351 95 1 35 95 1 1435 11 68 0.95 1 6B 0.95 1435 21 28 0.95 2 28 0.95 1435 101 10.8 0.9 10 10.8 0.9 1435 131 8.4 0.9 13 8.4 0.9 1435 151 2.7 0.9 15 2.7 0.9 1379 231 349.64 0.9 23 349.64 019 1380 231 158.61 0.9 23 15B.61 0.9 1381 231 221.8 0.9 23 221.8 0.9 1382 231 321.53 0.9 23 321.53 0.9 1383 231 210.33 0.9 23 210.33 0.9 1384 101 25.25 0.9 10 25.25 0.9 1384 231 67.02 0.9 23 67.02 0.9 1385 71 349 0.9 7 349 0.9 1386 231 228.21 0.9 23 228.21 0.9 1387 231 184.32 0.9 23 184.32 0.9 1388 10 106.11 0.9 10 106.11 0.9 1388 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1389 10 46.3 1 10 46.3 1 1389 23 201.78 0.9 23 201.78 0.9 1390 23 146.48 0.9 23 146.48 0.9 1391 23 97.42 0.9 23 97.42 0.9 1392 10 17.78 1 10 17.78 1 1392 231 160.59 0.9 23 160.59 0.9 1393 101 58.12 0.9 10 58.12 0.9 1436 21 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1436 31 1370 0.95 3 1370 0.95 1436 41 0 1 4 0 1 1436 101 3.5 0.9 10 3.5 0.9 1436 241 39.6 0.9 24 39.6 0.9 1436 261 48.002 0.9 26 48.002 0.9 1436 351 169 1 35 169 1 1436 381 0.17 1 38 0 1 1437 261 5 0.9 26 5 0.9 1438 231 57.4 0.9 23 57.4 0.9 1438 261 8.33 0.9 26 8.33 0.9 1438 271 0 0.9 27 0 0.9 1438 29 622 1 29 622 1 1439 2 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1439 3 464 0.95 3 723 0.95 1439 5 0 0.95 5 0 0.95 1439 10 50.91 0.9 10 50.91 0.9 U Revised Adopted True Minimum 1439 LU_Code 23 Quantity 239.51 OccupancyRate 0.9 LU Code 23 Quantity 367.81 OccupancyRate 0.9 1439 1439 24 25 61.63 0 0.9 0.9 24 25 0 0 0.9 0.9 1439 26 837.27 0.9 26 230.062 0.9 1439 35 59 1 35 0 1 1440 2 281Eao�.95 2 281 0.95 1441 1 462 1 462 0.95 1441 2 0 2 0 0.95 1441 3 2933 273 1441 6 90 6 145 0.9 1441 10 50.03 0.9 10 18.105 0.9 1441 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1441 1442 15 1 0 43 0.9 0.95 15 1 0 43 0.9 0.95 1442 2 214 0.95 2 214 0.95 1442 1443 38 1 6.79 125 1 0.95 38 1 6.79 125 1 0.95 1443 2 350 0.95 2 350 0.95 1443 3 54 0.95 3 54 0.95 1443 38 6.5 1 38 6.5 1 1444 1444 1 2 94 498.5 0.95 0.95 1 2 94 498.5 0.95 0.95 1445 1 139 0.9 1 139 0.9 1445 2 509 0.9 2 509 0.9 1446 1 124 0.95 1 124 0.95 1446 2 239 0.95 2 239 0.95 1446 38 2.69 1 38 2.69 1 1447 1 88 0.9 1 88 0.9 1447 21 415 0.9 2 415 0.9 1448 11 87 0.9 1 87 0.9 1448 21 103 0.9 2 103 0.9 1448 10 26.17 0.9 10 26.17 0.9 1448 13 2.24 0.9 13 2.24 0.9 1448 23 12.19 0.9 23 12.19 0.9 1448 24 0.99 0.9 24 0.99 0.9 1449 2 95 0.9 2 95 0.9 1449 10 74.9 0.9 10 74.9 0.9 1449 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1449 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1449 23 20.02 0.9 23 20.02 0.9 1450 2 159 0.9 2 159 0.9 1450 3 3 0.9 3 3 0.9 1450 6 16 0.9 6 16 0.9 1450 10 67.59 0.9 10 67.59 0.9 1450 13 0M92 0 0.9 1450 23 35.75 35.75 0.9 1 22 22 0.9 2 110110 0.9 1461 3 5 5 0.9 1451 6 3 3 0.9 1451 7 22 22 0.9 1451 10 82.75 0.9 10 82.75 0.9 1451 13 0 0.9 13 01 0.9 1 Revised Ado tad True Minimum LU Code lQuantity Occupant Rate LU Code Quantity Occu ant Rate 1451 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1451 23 8 0.9 23 8 0.9 1452 2 12 0.9 2 12 0.9 1452 10 130.511 0.9 10 130.51 0.9 1452 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1452 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1452 23 90.22 0.9 23 90.22 0.9 1452 371 6 1 37 6 1 1453 101 111.58 0.9 10 111.58 0.9 1453 131 0 0,9 13 0 0.9 1463 211 685 1 21 685 1 1453 231 119.9 0.9 23 119.9 0.9 1453 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1453 361 26.01 1 36 26.01 1 1454 11 41 0.9 1 0 0.9 1454 21 172 0.9 2 152 0.9 1464 101 201.78 0.9 10 53.27 0.9 1454 111 0.85 1 11 0.85 1 1454 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1454 161 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1454 231 101.5 0.9 23 0 0.9 1454 371 4.65 1 37 4.65 1 1455 11 3 0.9 1 3 0.9 1455 21 403 0.9 2 403 0.9 1455 101 108.22 0.9 10 108.22 0.9 1455 131 9.2 0.9 13 9.2 0.9 1455 231 1 0.9 23 1 0.9 1455 261 3,8 0.9 26 38 0.9 1456 11 1040 0.9 1 797 0.9 1456 21 102 0.9 2 98 0.9 1456 31 26 0.9 3 26 0.9 1457 11 218 0.9 1 218 0.9 1457 21 476 0.9 2 476 0.9 1457 31 103 0.9 3 103 0.9 1457 61 58 0.9 5 5B 0.9 1457 61 26 0.9 6 26 0.9 1457 101 12.54 0.9 10 12.54 0.9 1457 151 1.25 0.9 15 1.25 0.9 1457 201 58 1 20 58 1 1457 281 13.44 1 28 13.44 1 1457 291 389 1 29 389 1 1457 361 10.05 1 36 10.05 1 1457 371 17.4 1 37 17.4 1 1457 381 1.2 1 38 1.2 1 1458 ij 366 0.9 1 366 0.9 1458 21 684 0.9 2 684 0.9 1458 31 173 0.9 3 173 0.9 1458 i0l 20.81 0.9 10 20.81 0.9 1458 15 0 0:9 15 0 0.9 1458 20 14 1 20 14 1 1458 23 29.26 0.9 23 0 0.9 1458 24 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1458 32 4.8 1 32 4.8 1 m 36 7 10 13 23 23 1 2 3 7 10 11 13 15 17 21 23 33 37 1 2 3 19 38 1 2 10 13 17 20 23 26 38 13 3 10 13 16 1 2 6 10 13 15 23 24 33 36 38 10 13 20 Revised Adopted Quantity 2 164 120 0 591.6 165.04 9 131 69 34 196.53 4.25 p 0 0 350 60 1.7 4.97 677 194 51 2 0.83 214 263 4.99 20 8.29 352 12 5.04 0.78 32 520 112.45 27.42 17.42 43 3119 4 73.07 16.55 5.43 18.37 2.75 1.9 1.62 5 397 60.63 18A9 218 OccupancyRate 1 LU_Code 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0•9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9, 0.9 1 0.9 0.9 1 1 1 10.9 0.9 0.9 1 1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0 9 1 1 0.9 0.9 1 0.91 0.9 0.9 1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 3 0.95 0.9 U. Laq 36 7 10 13 23 3 21 2 3 7 10 11 13 15 17 210.9 23 33 37 1 2 3 19 38 1 2 10 13 17 20 23 26 38 10 13 16 1 2 6 10 13 15 23 24 1 33 1 36 1 38 10 13 1 20 True Minimum Quantit 2 164 120 0 591.E 165.04 131 69 34 196.53 4.25 0 p 0 350 60 1.7 4.97 677 194 51 2 0.83 214 263 4.99 20 8.29 352 5.04 0.78 32 520 12 .65 21.55 17.42 43 3119 4 73.07 7 .07 5.43 18.37 2.75 1•9 1.62 5 397 60.63 18.19 298 Occu ancyRate 1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0•9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1 1 0.9 1 1 0.9 0.9 0.1 1 1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1 1 0.9 1 0.9 0.9 0.9 1 0.9 0 9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 3 1 1 0.95 O:9 1 LU_Code 1458 1395 1395 1395 1396 1397 1459 1459 1459 1459 1459 1459 1459 1459 1459 1459 1459 1459 1459 1460 1460 1460 1460 1460 1461 1461 1461 1461 1461 1461 1461 1461 1461 1462 1463 1463 1463 1463 1464 1464 1464 1464 1464 1464 1464 1464 1464 1464 1464 1465 1465 1465 1465 Revised Adopted True Minimum LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate LU Code Quantity Occupanc Rate 1465 23 30.31 0.9 23 30.31 0.9 1466 2 212 0.95 2 212 0.95 1466 7 754 0.9 7 754 0.9 1466 13 83.93 0.9 13 83.93 0.9 1466 19 16 1 19 16 1 1466 22 64 1 22 64 1 1466 231 6 0.9 23 6 0.9 1466 371 2.69 1 37 2.69 1 1466 401 2 1 40 2 1 1467 31 1185 0.95 3 1185 0.95 1468 291 320 1 29 320 1 1469 21 792 0.95 2 792 0.95 1469 31 225 0.95 3 225 0.95 1469 281 6.45 1 28 6.45 1 1469 291 294 1 29 294 1 1469 301 1601 1 30 1801 1 1469 361 34.96 1 36 34.96 1 1469 371 34.97 1 37 34.97 1 1469 381 8 1 38 8 1 1470 21 145 0.95 2 145 0.95 1470 101 78.23 0.9 10 78.23 0.9 1470 191 19 1 19 19 1 1470 231 11.66 0.9 23 11.66 0.9 1398 231 82.583 0.9 23 82.583 0.9 1399 231 108.52 0.9 23 108.52 0.9 1400 231 62.08 0.9 23 62.08 0.9 1471 11 460 0.95 1 460 0.95 1471 381 2 1 38 2 1 1472 161 209.75 1 16 209.75 1 1473 31 300 0.95 3 300 0.95 1474 11 1686 0.95 1 1686 0.95 1474 21 208 0.95 2 208 0.95 1474 31 736 0.95 3 736 0.95 1474 101 35 0.9 10 35 0.9 1474 131 6.35 0.9 13 6.35 0.9 1474 38 14.23 1 38 14.23 1 1475 25 81.73 0.9 25 81.73 0.9 1475 27 196.42 0.9 27 196.42 0.9 1475 29 52 1 29 52 1 1475 33 55.2 1 33 65.2 1 1475 36 100.28 1 36 100.28 1 1476 2 227 0.95 2 227 0.95 1477 11 500 0.95 1 500 0.95 1478 21 50 0.95 2 50 0.95 1479 1 101 0.95 1 101 0.95 1479 2 54 0.95 2 54 0.95 1480 2 144 0.95 2 144 0.95 1480 3 80 0.95 3 80 0.95 1401 24 86.096 0.9 24 86.096 0.9 1402 23 45.794 0.9 23 45.794 0.9 1481 1 101 0.95 1 101 0.95 14B1 1 21 182 0.95 2 182 0.95 14811 101 2.3 0.9 10 2.3 0.9 MO Revised Ado ted True Minimum LU Code Quant4 Occu anc Rate LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate 1496 3 152 0.9 3 152 0.9 1496 29 12.03 1 29 12.03 1 1497 1 143 0.9 1 143 0.9 1497 2 214 0.9 2 214 0.9 1497 3 48 0.9 3 48 0.9 1498 1 234 0.9 1 234 0.9 1498 21 0 0.9 2 0 0.9 1498 31 48 0.9 3 61, 0.9 1498 101 92.44 0.9 10 41.469 0.9 1498 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1498 231 23.98 0.9 23 0 0.9 1498 381 3.6 1 38 3.6 1 1499 1 144 0.9 1 0 0.9 1500 1 178 0.95 1 178 0.95 1500 381 1.03 1 38 1.03 1 1501 11 849 0.9 1 0 0.9 1501 21 0 0.9 2 0 0.9 1501 101 106,84 10.9 10 0 0.9 1501 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1501 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1501 211 0 1 21 0 1 1501 231 36.05 0.9 23 0 0.9 1501 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1501 381 2.5 1 38 0 1 1502 11 186 0.9 1 849 0.9 1502 21 0 0.9 2 0 0.9 1502 101 104.41 0.9 10 83.396 0.9 1502 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1502 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1502 231 33.09 0.9 23 0 0.9 1502 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1404 231 434,953 0.9 23 434.953 0.9 1405 101 129.3 0.9 10 129.3 0.9 1405 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1405 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1405 231 688.16 0.9 23 688.16 0.9 1406 251 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1406 261 430 0.9 26 430 0.9 1407 101 31.72 0.9 10 31.72 0.9 1407 151 1.56 0.9 15 1.56 0.9 1407 231 124.99 0.9 23 124.99 0.9 1407 241 3.77 0.9 24 3.77 0.9 1503 11 52 0.9 1 0 0.9 1503 21 0 0.9 2 0 0.9 1503 101 88.02 0.9 10 21.444 0.9 1503 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1503 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1503 181 0 1 18 0 1 1503 23 9.97 0.9 23 0 0.9 1503 24 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1504 1 542 0.95 1 186 0.95 1504 2 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1504 10 88.02 0.9 10 78.212 0.9 La 1 :1 LU_Code 13 15 18 23 24 36 1 2 10 13 15 23 32 33 1 2 3 1 38 1 2 3 29 37 1 1 10 2 1 4 18 31 1 3 28 3 3 23 26 1 3 10 23 26 34 01200\01232\TGcalc\LandUseAltsTGCom Revised Adopted Quantit 0 0 0 9.97 0 12.34 843 0 58.9 0 0 35 3 8 5 363 0 6 142 0.78 228 120 120 790 5.85 200 20 70.79 246 348 100 1 24.07 41 388 1220 1052 117.8 82.2 225 238 50 117.8 82.2 443 OccupancyRate 0.9 0.9 1 0.9 0.9 1 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1 1 0•95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 1 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.95 1 1 1 0.95 0.95 1 0.9 0.91 0.9 0 9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1 are\LuForModel\ LU_Code 13 15 18 23 24 36 1 2 10 13 15 23 32 33 1 2 3 1 3g 1 2 3 29 37 1 1 10 2 1 4 18 37 1 3 2g 3 23 26 3 10 23 26 34 LuChan True Minimum Quantity 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 20.111 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 0.78 228 120 120 790 5.85 200 20 70.79 246 348 100 1 24.07 41 388 8.4 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 443 eCom are.xls OccupancyRate0 9 0.9 1 0.9 1 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 1 1 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 1 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.95 1 1 1 0.95 0.95 1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.1 1 TrueMinimum 1504 1504 1504 1504 1504 1504 1505 1505 1505 1505 1505 1505 1505 1505 1506 1506 1506 1507 1507 1508 1508 1508 1508 150E 1510 1511 1511 1512 1513 1513 1513 1513 1514 1515 1515 1556 1558 1558 1558 1559 1559 1559 1559 1559 1713 U:\UcJobs\ 03 APPENDIX M ' TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT TRIP GENERATION r� II II r II I I I i Total Trip Ends By NBTM TAZ Analysis Year: 2040 Reference Number: 01232 Runid: BOminl Build Date: 4/14/2005 Land Use: BOmin1 Build7'ime: 12:45:00 PM Network: BOOS01 Modeler. Marlie Whiteman NO Prat HSch AM NSchProd KW NW Prod 00 Attr NO Prod OW Attr OW Prod MTM NO AtV TAZ g 6AUr a 2,274 1373 563 0 0 387 0 395 404 261 265 2,274 1374 563 0 0 0 0 607 621 397 403 3,481 1375 869 0 0 0 584 0 631 646 417 424 3,638 1376 902 0 0 0 619 0 908 928 599 609 5,229 1377 1,296 0 0 0 889 0 1,026 1,049 678 688 5,912 1378 1,465 0 0 0 1,005 450 485 '624 639 3,873 1379 459 0 0 0 1,216 0 204 220 283 290 1,757 1380 208 0 0 0 552 0 286 307 396 406 2,457 1381 291 0 0 0 771 0 414 446 574 588 3,562 1382 422 0 0 0 1,118 0 271 292 375 385 2,330 1383 276 0 0 0 731 0 294 301 197 201 1,708 1384 418 0 0 0 296 0 399 405 361 399 2,645 1385 430 0 0 0 650 0 0 294 316 407 417 2,528 1386 300 0 0 0 794 0 237 256 329 337 2,042 1367 242 0 0 0 641 875 876 327 329 4,057 1388 1,387 0 0 0 264 0 684 704 519 529 4,202 1389 937 0 0 0 829 0 0 189 203 261 268 1,623 1390 192 0 0 0 509 125 135 174 178 1,079 1391 126 0 0 0 339 0 0 370 386 347 355 2,534 1392 469 0 0 0 608 479 480 179 180 2,222 1393 760 0 0 0 144 0 0 605 614 455 488 3,671 1394 764 0 0 0 746 0 1,177 1,181 540 560 5,831 1395 1,770 0 0 0 604 0 762 820 1,055 1,082 6,554 1396 777 0 0 0 2,057 213 229 294 302 1,828 1397 217 0 0 0 574 0 0 106 114 147 151 915 1398 108 0 0 0 287 140 150 194 198 1,202 1399 142 0 0 0 377 0 82 0 0 0 216 0 80 86 111 114 688 1400 0 339 0 236 239 195 215 1,496 1401 272 0 0 0 59 63 82 84 507 1402 60 0 0 0 0 159 2,363 0 1,218 1,265 1,279 1,355 8,820 1403 1,340 0 0 1,513 0 560 603 776 796 4,818 1404 571 0 0 0 0 2,714 0 1,952 2,021 1,627 1,660 12,567 1405 2,593 0 0 979 0 170 204 460 460 2,358 1406 85 0 0 0 535 0 454 467 337 344 2,761 1407 624 0 0 0 Page 1 of 6 Thursday, April 14, 2005 Analysts Year: 2040 Runid: BOmini Land Use: BOmin1 Network: BOOS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/1412005 Build Time: 12:45:00 PM Modeler, Media Whiteman TAZ N Attr NO Prod Bch Attr Itch Prod OW Attr NW Prat 00 Attr 00 Prod 0W Attr OW Prod Total 1408 94 522 0 48 45 267 97 97 47 21 1,239 1409 1,835 0 0 0 2,970 0 1,571 1,642 1,630 1,693 11,341 1410 31 247 0 28 11 152 44 45 18 2 579 1411 34 0 0 0 16 0 24 24 12 13 124 1412 39 216 0 20 19 111 40 40 19 9 513 1413 451 93 0 11 487 57 374 381 293 308 2,454 1414 98 476 8 40 159 172 119 122 95 82 1,371 1415 103 551 0 51 66 282 108 109 58 32 I'm 1416 126 668 0 66 62 365 128 128 64 29 1,636 1417 35 202 0 19 18 103 37 38 18 8 478 1418 38 209 0 20 18 109 39 39 19 9 Soo 1419 112 623 0 58 64 319 116 116 56 25 1,478 1420 300 1,648 0 155 146 857 309 309 149 68 3,940 1421 3,080 1,477 560 137 1,600 840 2,237 2,266 1,240 1,166 14,603 1422 316 1,737 0 163 154 903 325 326 157 71 4,152 1423 236 943 0 88 233 490 255 255 163 130 2,793 1424 504 3,694 0 327 186 2,146 723 723 298 27 8,627 1425 204 0 0 0 502 0 197 210 260 267 1,640 1426 97 422 0 40 120 219 106 108 79 61 1,252 1427 794 1,978 1,922 192 968 1,016 756 776 606 527 9,534 1428 5,016 1,454 0 120 1,685 699 3,417 3,430 1,543 1,512 18,856 1429 468 2,554 384 236 305 1,319 499 502 269 141 6,677 1430 4,106 108 0 10 1,860 55 2,764 2,796 1,465 1,488 14,652 1431 2,074 106 0 8 647 53 1,355 1,364 608 608 6,824 1432 1,415 1,826 0 191 894 1,045 1,146 1,162 673 580 8,933 1433 450 1,347 0 162 1,022 793 548 574 581 505 5,981 1434 2,201 0 0 0 4,658 0 2,846 2,798 2,247 3,330 18,081 1435 400 319 0 32 91 174 277 278 100 92 1,772 1436 664 3,108 0 333 527 2,041 833 840 474 231 9,051 1437 1 0 0 0 11 0 2 2 5 5 27 , 1438 86 0 647 0 326 0 96 106 162 164 1,481 1439 1,435 1,613 0 163 2,022 1,074 1,324 1,379 1,209 1,090 11,308 1440 97 756 0 90 36 486 139 139 58 5 1,806 1441 794 2,382 0 215 420 1,257 739 741 374 255 7,176 1442 105 745 0 83 46 449 138 138 60 13 1,777 1443 224 1,551 0 165 95 916 288 288 126 28 3,682 1444 235 1,713 0 190 93 1,036 312 313 133 23 4,048 Thursday, April 14, 2005 „l'1 Page 2 of 6 Analysis Year: 2040 Reference•Numberr 01232 Runid: BOmin1 Build Date: 4/1 412005 Land Use: BOmin1 Build rime: 12:45:00 PM Network: BOOS01 Modeler. Marlie Whiteman MTM NO AM N0 Prod NSoh Attr NSoh Prod NW Attr HW Prod 00 Attr 00 Prod OW Attr OW Prod Total TAZ 0 173 103 667 323 323 142 28 3,690 1445 250 1,681 71 642 203 203 90 24 2,617 1446 164 1,102 0 118 247 248 108 19 2,828 1447 189 1,290 0 134 76 516 161 129 2,436 1446 487 527 0 51 157 201 361 362 1,036 231 0 25 267 96 687 690 285 271 3,589 1449 0 43 333 163 694 698 317 292 3,935 1450 1,001 394 140 788 790 324 304 4,203 1451 1,173 349 0 36 299 12 1,223 1,233 591 600 6,227 1452 1,849 29 0 3 688 0 1,134 1,148 611 622 5,989 1453 1,686 0 0 0 787 535 536 217 194 3,00E 1454 770 370 0 40 193 153 494 424 6,984 1455 1,718 990 0 107 439 409 1,199 1,203 571 3,838 0 252 252 1,010 647 648 267 112 7,597 1456 2,211 342 221 563 853 751 754 440 315 7,171 1457 720 319 294 1,250 812 813 360 148 7,997 1458 791 3,209 0 52 882 203 1,911 1,920 847 827 9,996 1459 2,850 504 0 995 547 548 262 112 6,194 1460 504 2,728 0 250 249 341 261 5,81 1461 971 1,716 0 129 346 503 773 777 21 128 0 9 10 36 22 22 10 4 262 1462 0 111 470 462 1,571 1,574 592 502 9,152 1463 2,230 1,640 748 3,189 2,373 2,378 997 438 21,090 1464 2,447 7,683 0 837 467 1,017 1,021 441 36B 6,143 1465 1,435 869 0 116 409 367 2,483 2,488 1,511 1,801 14,671 1466 3,073 476 0 68 2,406 245 22 6,820 1467 404 2,829 0 268 151 1,760 574 574 5 0 282 0 55 0 10 12 26 26 415 1468 543 2,586 1,844 304 903 1,704 756 770 592 433 10,434 1469 46 412 251 881 881 369 405 4,957 1470 1,232 480 0 848 347 347 149 68 4,432 1471 317 2,058 0 153 146 1,496 1,504 654 661 7,308 1472 2,318 0 0 0 675 0 176 62 6 2,132 1473 118 1,043 0 68 38 445 176 876 404 21,604 1474 1,984 8,328 0 793 767 4,560 1,945 1,947 0 46 0 1,112 0 372 395 551 590 3,358 1475 291 72 29 393 136 136 47 4 1,769 1476 90 861 0 157 921 381 382 161 73 4,87 1477 347 2,291 0 166 1 390 1478 20 190 0 16 6 86 30 30 10 16 1,406 1479 92 668 0 51 39 280 109 109 44 92 899 0 64 29 368 140 140 46 4 1,783 1480 92 61 501 213 213 77 25 2,594 1481 177 1,236 0 2005 (y� Page 3 0 Thursday, April 14, I � 15 Analysis Year. Runld: Lend Use., Network: 2040 BOmin1 BOminl BOO801 Reference Number 01232 BUIldDete:4/1412005 Build 77me: 12:45:00 PM Modeler. Media Whiteman NNTM TAZ W Attr NO Prod NSch Attr NSch Prod NW Attr NW Prod 00 Attr 00 Prod M Attr M Prod TO 1482 333 1,152 0 77 205 444 332 332 164 128 3,167 1483 15 102 0 7 7 39 17 17 7 3 213 1484 2,062 0 0 0 4,167 0 1,895 1,996 2,211 2,300 14,630 1485 12,657 0 0 0 3,224 0 8,132 8,156 3,362 3,410 38,940 1486 2,958 831 0 55 3,591 364 2,393 2,482 2,104 2,111 16,889 1487 1,157 248 0 22 1,472 119 1,060 '1,069 832 961 6,939 1488 47 438 0 39 16 211 71 71 25 2 920 1489 154 818 0 73 42 394 173 173 63 20 1,910 1490 152 0 0 0 403 0 149 161 207 212 1,283 1491 1,727 0 0 0 3,014 0 1,570 1,628 1,634 1,735 11,308 1492 1,259 0 0 0 1,756 0 1,015 1,060 990 1,015 7,094 1493 538 0 0 0 1,424 0 527 568 731 749 4,536 1494 1,476 0 0 0 660 0 996 999 476 497 5,004 1495 1,107 1,667 0 125 1,080 501 956 976 693 641 7,745 1496 190 1,478 11 121 73 474 261 261 103 18 2,990 1497 175 1,143 0 107 74 418 216 216 95 24 2,467 1498 853 9al 0 83 212 335 619 619 250 197 4,148 1499 88 478 0 40 43 160 91 91 44 20 1,055 1500 122 774 0 59 57 328 132 132 58 26 1,688 1501 1,907 3,390 0 251 537 1,012 1,462 1,464 600 448 11,070 1502 1,422 790 0 67 308 269 962 963 374 332 5,486 1503 561 275 0 20 117 83 377 377 144 131 2,085 1504 1,090 1,964 0 189 338 1,057 839 640 366 265 6,948 1505 1,181 2,983 0 287 432 1,600 975 977 446 296 9,177 1506 496 1,266 0 122 180 678 408 409 187 122 3,867 1507 93 631 0 47 45 262 107 107 46 21 1,363 1508 275 1,691 695 141 286 806 343 348 211 130 4,927 1510 134 814 0 67 63 369 143 143 64 29 1,825 1511 938 81 0 7 182 37 598 598 225 223 2,889 1512 92 $07 0 79 31 426 135 135 51 5 1,761 1513 364 1,804 0 135 316 676 417 417 235 171 4,536 1514 28 173 0 14 13 76 30 30 13 6 382 1515 173 1,160 0 88 117 576 245 245 115 46 2,768 1516 107 512 0 41 202 150 151 155 124 99 1,541 1517 1,081 471 1,044 36 608 238 798 808 454 438 5,974 1518 352 2,684 0 168 147 929 416 416 156 66 5,335 1519 320 1,889 0 158 159 875 340 340 158 75 4,314 Thursday, April 14, 2005 f,r1 f Page 4 of 6 Analysis Year. Runld: Land Use: Network: 2040 BOmin1 SOminl BOOS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/14/2005 Build Time: 12:45:00 PM Modeler: Marlie.Whiteman ON TAZ NO AUP 10 Prod HSoh AUP NSeh Prod HW AM HW PM 00 Attr 00 Prod OW AUP OW Prod YOM 137 814 0 69 65 362 145 145 67 30 1,853 1520 396 2,307 438 193 274 1,069 427 431 230 129 5,894 1521 1,418 1,193 0 78 337 427 993 996 384 343 6,169 1522 195, 1,266 0 64 240 278 263 265 160 120 2,851 1523 195 1,266 0 64 240 278 263 265 160 120 2,851 1524 406 3,288 0 249 141 1,633 595 596 227 20 7,156 1525 193 1,153 0 96 91 534 204 205 93 42 2,612 1526 46 399 0 40 16 216 6B 68 26 2 880 1527 0 0 113 0 48 49 57 64 371 1528 39 355 0 4,331 362 193 139 842 550 552 148 45 7,515 1529 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1530 0 821 0 1,721 0 0 127 267 677 672 673 280 205 5,443 1531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1532 0 0 0 102 80 397 261 261 84 28 3,323 1534 179 1,931 0 193 139 642 550 552 148 45 7,515 1535 355 4,331 362 205 269 574 576 220 182 4,096 1536 754 1,247 0 69 205 269 574 576 220 182 4,096 1537 754 1,247 0 69 84 945 0 48 22 187 113 114 32 4 1,549 1538 1,141 0 58 110 227 151 155 77 44 2,073 1539 109 0 675 0 352 352 352 411 2,436 1540 294 0 0 51 226 120 121 46 18 1,687 1641 90 956 0 58 1542 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 2 2 11 61 0 0 0 292 0 72 82 142 142 792 16643 250 2,785 0 120 87 578 340 342 102 22 4,625 1544 67 749 0 33 11 161 90 90 22 0 1,225 1545 0 0 0 292 0 72 82 142 142 792 1546 61 0 102 80 397 261 261 84 28 3,323 1547 179 1,931 80 397 261 261 84 28 3,323 1548 179 1,931 0 102 261 261 84 28 3,323 1549 179 1,931 0 102 80 397 92 959 0 60 17 283 117 117 33 0 1,679 1550 1551 45 495 0 22 7 108 60 60 15 0 811 1552 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1553 66 736 0 33 11 160 89 89 22 0 1,206 1554 55 402 0 18 108 87 77 79 62 52 939 1555 55 402 0 18 108 87 77 79 62 52 939 1556 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1557 99 449 0 28 18 150 92 92 31 11 968 Page Thursday, Aprtl 14, 2005 �I 5of6 Analysis Year. 2040 Runld.., BOmin1 Land Use: BOmin1 Network: BOOs01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/14/2005 Build 7/me: 12:45:00 PM Modeler, Marlle Whiteman N" TAZ NO Attr NO prod NO AUP NSCh Prod NW Attr NW Prod 00 AtW 00 Prod OW AM OW Prod Total 1558 2 17 0 1 1 10 3 3 1 0 39 1559 2 17 0 1 1 10 3 3 1 0 39 1618 4 24 0 2 2 11 4 4 2 1 54 1713 434 0 0 0 2,140 0 620 670 1,042 1,104 6,010 1714 227 1,564 0 152 86 999 322 322 139 12 3,824 1715 682 0 0 0 604 0 537 643 378 410 3,164 1716 465 29 0 13 604 4 410 415 345 380 2,665 Thursday, April 14, 2005 m� Page 6 of 6 APPENDIX N TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT TRIP GENERATION CHANGE FROM CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BY TAZ TRUE MINIMUM TqZ TOTAL TPZ TOTAL CHANGE p 1313 2210 1313 294 a 13]6 22]4 13]4 22i0 � 19]6 3401 13i5 �� � 1316 3830 13]6 3� �. 13]] 5229 13I1 5229 � 1318 6912 ffil8 5812 � 19]9 38]3 13]9 ��3 � 1300 P5/ 1380 1]5� 0 1381 24fi] 1381 245/ � 1382 3%2 1302 3682 � 1383 2330 1383 �� p 13&l 1100 1�4 � 1386 2fi45 1385 2645 Q 1386 2528 130fi 2628 � 1381 2W2 1�> �2 � 1308 405/ 1380 4051 0 1309 4202 1389 0202 � 1990 1623 1390 1823 1381 1W9 1391 ]9 EEI REVISED 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i �3 REVISED TRUE MINIMUM TAZ TOTAL TAZ TOTAL CHANGE 1426 1252 1426 1262 0 1427 9534 1427 9534 0 1428 18856 1428 18856 0 1429 6677 1429 6677 0 1430 14652 1430 14652 0 1431 6824 1431 6824 0 1432 8933 1432 8933 0 1433 4953 1433 5981 1028 1434 18081 1434 18081 0 1435 1772 1435 1772 0 1436 9052 1436 9051 -1 1437 27 1437 27 0 1438 1487 1438 1487 0 1439 12964 1439 11308 -1656 1440 1806 1440 1806 0 1441 8183 1441 7176 -1007 1442 1777 1442 1777 0 1443 3682 1443 3682 0 1444 404E 1444 4048 0 1445 3690 1445 3690 0 1446 2617 1446 2617 0 1447 2828 1447 2828 0 1448 2436 1448 2436 0 1449 3589 1449 3589 0 1450 3935 1450 3935 0 1451 4203 1451 4203 0 1452 6227 1452 6227 0 1453 5989 1453 5989 0 1454 10211 1454' 3008 -7203 1455 6984 1455 6984 0 1456 9691 1456 7597 -2094 1457 7171 1457 7171 0 1458 8321 1458 7997 -324 1459 9996 1459 9996 0 1460 6194 1460 6194 0 1461 5819 1461 5819 0 1462 262 1462 262 0 1463 9152 1463 9152 0 1464 21090 1464 21090 0 1465 6143 1465 6143 0 1466 14671 1466 14671 0 1467 6826 1467 6826 0 1468 415 1468 415 0 1469 10434 1469 10434 0 1470 4957 1470 4957 0 1471 4432 1471 4432 0 1472 7308 1472 7308 0 1473 2132 1473 2132 0 1474 21604 1474 21604 0 1475 3358 1475 3358 0 1476 1769 1476 1769 0 1477 4879 1477 4879 0 1478 390 1478 390 0 Ny REVISED TRUE MINIMUM TpZ TOTAL TAZ TOTAL CHANGE 0 1479 1406 1479 1406 0 1480 1783 1480 1783 0 1481 2594 1481 2594 0 1482 3167 1482 3 0 1483 213 1483 213 213 0 1484 14630 1484 14630 0 1485 38940 1485 38940 0 1486 16B89 1486 16889 0 1487 6939 1487 6939 0 1488 920 1488 920 0 1489 1910 1489 1910 0 1490 1283 1490 1283 0 1491 11308 1491 11308 0 1492 7094 1492 7094 0 1493 4536 1493 4536 0 1494 5004 1494 5004 0 1495 7745 1495 7745 0 1496 2990 1496 2990 0 1497 2467 1497 2467 -1625 1498 5773 1498 4148 0 1499 1055 1499 1055 0 1500 1688 1500 1688 -258 1501 11328 1501 11070 1502 5722 1502 5486 -236 1503 3884 1503 2085 -1799 1504 8078 1504 6948 -1130 -670 1505 9847 1505 9177 800 1506 3067 1506 3867 0 1507 1363 1507 1363 0 1508 4927 1508 4927 0 1510 1825 1510 1825 0 1511 2889 1511 2889 0 1512 1761 1542 4536 0 1513 4536 1513 4536 0 1514 382 1514 382 0 1515 2768 1515 2768 0 1541 1516 1541 1516 0 1517 5974 1517 5974 0 1518 5335 1518 5335 0 1519 4314 6519 4314 1853 0 1520 1853 1520 0 1521 5894 1521 5894 6169 0 1522 6169 1522 2851 0 1523 2851 1523 0 1524 2851 1524 2851 0 1525 7156 1525 7156 0 1526 2612 1526 2612 0 1527 880 1527 880 371 0 1528 371 1528 7515 0 1529 7515 1529 0 1530 0 1530 0 0 1531 5443 1531 5443 0 0 1532 0 1532 REVISED TRUE MINIMUM TAZ TOTAL TAZ TOTAL CHANGE 1534 3323 1534 3323 0 1635 7515 1535 7515 0 1536 4096 1636 4096 0 1537 4096 1537 4096 0 1538 1549 1538 1549 0 1539 2073 1539 2073 0 1540 2436 1540 2436 0 1541 1687 1541 1687 0 1542 11 1542 11 0 1543 792 1543 792 0 1544 4625 1544 4625 0 1545 1225 1545 1225 0 1546 792 1546 792 0 1547 3323 1547 3323 0 1548 3323 1548 3323 0 1549 3323 1549 3323 0 1550 1679 1550 1679 0 1551 811 1551 811 0 1552 0 1552 0 0 1553 1206 1553 1206 0 1554 939 1554 939 0 1555 939 1555 939 0 1556 6858 1556 0 -6858 1557 968 1557 968 0 1558 7643 1558 39 -7604 1559 6792 1559 39 -6753 1618 541 16181 541 0 1713 6010 1713 6010 0 1714 3824 1714 3824 0 1715 3154 1715 3154 0 1716 2665 1716 2665 0 U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\TGcaic\LandUseAltsTGCom are\LuForModell ri Ch Com are.xls Com areTrueMi ol� APPENDIX O TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS 2. Superior & Placentia True Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 2 3200 NBR 1 1600 SBT 2 3200 SBR d 1600 EBR d 1600 WBL WBT 1.5 3200 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM HVUC L VOL 430 .269 1520 20 .013* 50 .031* 410 .006 10 .006 .219* 350 20 {.012}* 390 .150 EBR .066* TOTAL CAPACITY W ILUA11UN 03 ioi PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 310 .194* 680 .213 40 .025 60 .038 1060 .331* 10 .006 10 .006* 500 .313 30 440 .203* 180 EBR .123* nr� 3. Superior & Coast Hw. True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 250 450 NBT 1.5 4800 530 .177* 370 .194* NBR 0 70 110 SBL 1.5 190 210 SBT 1.5 4800 170 .075* 380 .123* SBR 2 3200 240 .075 930 .291 EBL 2 3200 1540 .481 450 .141* EBT 3 4800 3350 .698* 1320 .275 EBR d 1600 260 .163 280 .175 WBL 1 1600 50 .031* 210 .131 WBT 4 6400 790 .123 2930 .458* WBR d 1600 200 .125 150 .094 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .027* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 4. Newport & Hospital 981 .943 True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL VIC VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 280 175 270 .169* NBT 3 4800 1840 .383* 1630 .340 NBR 1 1600 90 .056 70 .044 SBL 1 1600 140 .088* 40 .025 SBT 3 4800 1180 .246 2160 .450* SBR d 1600 470 .294 250 .156 EBL 2 3200 270 .084 480 .150 EBT 1 1600 400 .250* 340 .213* EBR 1 1600 160 .100 180 .113 WBL 1 1600 110 .069* 210 .131* WBT 2 3200 360 .116 240 .081 WBR 0 0 10 20 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 790 M D� 5. Newport & Via Lido True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 3 4800 1860 .388* 1090 .227 NBR 1 1600 10 .006 40 .025 SBL 2 3200 390 .122* 450 .141 SBR 3 4800 770 .160 1770 .369* EBL 0 0 0 EBT EBR 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 1 1600 10 .006-* 50 .031* WBR 2 3200 380 .119 580 .181 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .009* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 6. Newport & 32nd bib 4uv True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 20 .013* 1120 730 58 019 NBR d 1600 .013* .60 SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 90 .056 SBR 3200 690 .247 1310 .478* 0 EBL EBR 1.5 0.5 490 30 150 40 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006* WBL 0.5 40 .025* 30 1.5 3200 .019 .028* WBR 130 1'60 50 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 45/ 05 7. Riverside & Coast Hw. True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 10 NBT 1600 .013* 10 .019* NBR d 1600 0 .000 10 .006 SBL 0.5 110 {.0691* 70 {.0441* SBT 0.5 1600 10 .075 10 1050 SBR 1 1600 360 .225 510 .319 EBL 1 1600 410 .256 340 .213* EBT 2 3200 2940 .922* 2070 .653 EBR 0 0 10 20 WBL 1 1600 10 .006* 50 .031 WBT 3 4800 1630 .340 3690 .769* WBR 1 1600 50 .031 40 .025 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .055* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 8. Tustin & Coast Hw. 1.010 1.100 True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 10 {.0061* 10 {.0061* 1600 .019 10 .619 NBR 0 10 SBL 01 SBT 1600 10 .081* 10 .088* SBR 0 0 30 40 EBL 1 1600 10 .006 110 .069* EBT 2 3200 2930 .919* 1990 .625 EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 0 0 0 0 WBT 3 4800 1730 .360 3190 .665* WBR 1 1600 60 .038 110 .069 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION M 1.006 .828 9. MacArthur & Campus True Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBR 1 1600 1600 SBR 1 4800 EBT 3 EBR d 1600 4800 WBT 3 WBR f Right Turn Adjustment AM HOURVOL HOUR L VOL VOPK 140 .088 310 .194* 1110 1100 .069* .063 250 .156* 150 .094 1480 1920 .300 .575* 820 .256* 530 .166* 1190 .119 120 .075 120 .038 150 .047 520 .108* 1490 .310* 19 SBR .026* SBR .372* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILILA11UN 10. MacArthur & Birch True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 1120 .025 170' 1070 .106* NBR 1 1600 .075* .044 SBL 1 4 1600 6400 240 800 .150* 130 1150 .081 222* SBT SBR 0 .167 270 EBT 1.5 4800 550 .223* 390 .175* EBR 0 WBL 1 1600 3200 40 2i0 .025 .075* 130 940 .081 .294* WBR f 360 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILILA11UN Nil .ivc 11. Von Karman & Campus True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006* NBT 2 3200 780 .244* 630 .197 NBR f 50 40 SBL 1 1600 40 .025* 180 .113 SBT 2 3200 550 .206 1050 .406* SBR 0 0 110 250 EBL 1 1600 340 .213* 250 .156* EBT 2 3200 710 .222 910 .284 EBR 1 1600 50 .031 30 .019 WBL 1 1600 60 .038 40 .025 WBT 2 3200 420 .156* 1040 .369* WBR 0 0 80 140 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 12, MacArthur & Von Karmah .638 .937 True Minimum HV/C OU HV/C LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 1 1600 160 .100 50 .031* NBT 3 4800 1400 .292* 870 .181 NBR 1 1600 560 .350 200 .125 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 90 .056 SBT 3 4800 570 .119 1190 .248* SBR 1 1600 190 .119 110 .069 EBL 1 1600 40 .025* 150 .094 EBT 2 3200 160 .050 290 .091* EBR f 40 130 WBL 2 3200 150 .047 860 .269* WBT 1 1600 210 .131* 210 .131 WBR f 50 100 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .058* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .544 639 13. Jamboree & Campus True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 4 1600 6400 50 2300 .031 .392* 110 1780 .069* .371 NBT NBR 0 0 210 740 .463 SBL 2 3 3200 4800 660 1540 .206* •392 370 2730 .116 .638* SBT SBR 0 0 340 330 EBL 2 3200 3200 200 330 .063 .100* 700 810 .219* .259 EBR f . WBL 2 3200 3200 750 .234* 340 640 .106 WBR 1 6 0 120 .075 490 .306* Right Turn Adjustment WBR .106* . nnn TOTAL CAPACITY UHLiLAUUN 14. Jamboree & Birch True Minimum tiac I . . -- AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 3 1600 4800 380 22180 .238* .477 120 1790 .075 .383* NBR 0 so SBL 1 1600 6400 10 18810 .006 .283* 110 250 300 .069* 342 SBR f EBT 0.5 3200 120 .088* 640 .213* EBR f 3480 WBT 11 1600 60 .188* 160 .137* WBR 0 0 190 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing nnn TOTAL CAPACITY U11ULA11Un /vJ 15. Campus & Bristol (N) True Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 3 4800 NBR 0 0 SBT 4 6400 SBR 2 3200 EBL 0 EBT 0 EBR 0 0 WBT 4 6400 WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL VIC VOL VIC 510, .159 580 .181* 3190 .665* 1570 .327 0 0 410 .064 1900 .297* 300 .094 1260 .394 0 0 0 0 320 .100 450 .141 1540 .295* 3070 .500* 350 130 SBR .097* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .960 1.075 16. Birch & Bristol (N) True Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 2 3200 NBR 0 0 SBL SBT 1.5 6400 SBR 2.5 EBL 0 EBT 0 EBR 0 0 WBL WBT 3.5 8000 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL VIC VOL VIC 130 .041 170 .053* 1390 .434* 430 .134 0 0 150 .063 780 .366* 250 1560 0 0 0 0 1560 .325* 1750 .298* 790 .494 110 WBR .169* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION DO 928 .717 17. Campus/Irvine & Bristol (S) True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 5 8000 2350 .350* 1420 .265* NBR 0 0 SBL 1 1600 4800 100 630 .063* 340 2010 .213* .419 SBR 3 .131 EBL 1.5 2.5 6400 1360 1820 {.497)* .497 460 1330 {.280)* .280 EBT EBR 2 3200 620 .194 590 .184 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY W ILUA11UN 18. Birch & Bristol (S) True Minimum VXV AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 2.5 6400 560 .155* 250 .078 NBR 1.5 530 .109 SBL 2 3200 3200 180 370 .056* 400 910 .125 •284* SBT SBR 2 0 0 .116 EBL EBT 1.5 3.5 8000 960 1100 (.305)* .305 280 1550 .244* EBR 0 120 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 r_no TOTAL CAPACITY UTILILAIIUN 0�k a.iu 19. Irvine & Mesa True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 90 .056 50 .031* NBT 3 4800 1960 .408* 930 .194 NBR 1 1600 660 .413 190 .119 SBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 ..006 SBT 3 4800 960 .200 2150 .448* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 200 .125 EBL 1 1600 330 .206* 90 .056* EBT 2 3200 390 .122 70 .022 EBR 1 1600 40 .025 240 .150 WBL 2 3200 150 .047 470 .147 WBT 1 1600 70 .050* 580 .369* WBR 0 0 10 10 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .005* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 20. Irvine & University 675 .904 True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 180 .113 210 .131* NBT 2 3200 2420 .756* 1070 .334 NBR 1 1600 60 .038 20 .013 SBL 1 1600 90 .056* 40 .025 SBT 2 3200 940 .294 2650 .828* SBR 1 1600 130 .081 380 .238 EBL 1 1600 510 .319* 230 .144* EBT 2 3200 120 .038 30 .009 EBR d 1600 240, .150 140 .088 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBT 1 1600 30 .019* 90 .056* WBR d 1600 20 .013 50 .031 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1.150 1.159 017, 21. Irvine & Santiago True Minimum LANES CAPACITY 3200 NBT 2 NBR 0 0 3200 SBT 2 SBR d 1600 1600 EBR d 00 WBR d 1600 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR VOL V/C 90 .056 1490 .469* 10 920 .288 40 .025 140 {.125)* 130 .081 20 60 .050* 160 .100 WBR .050* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATIUN 22. Irvine & Highland True Minimum .by4 AM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 100 .063 NBT 2 3200 1590 .497* NBR d 1600 10 .006 SBL 1 1600 20 .013* S.353 1130 BR d 1600 20 .013 EBL 0 0 80 4.0501* EBR d 1600 120 .075 WBT WBL 01 1600 20 .025* WBR d 1600 60 .038 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .025* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZA11UN blU 013 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 150 .094* 11Z0 .359 1800 .563* 120 .075 700 .6817 150 .094 90 .063* 70 .044 I;JI PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 80 .050* 1320 .013 .019 1690 528 .* 70 .044 200 .6252}* 70 .044 10 20 .013 UGu 23. Irvine & Dover True Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 2 3200 NBR d 1600 SBT 2 3200 SBR d 1600 EBT 1 1600 EBR 0 0 WBT 1 1600 WBR 1 1600 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 1260 .394* 1040 .325* 20 .013 20 .013 180 .113* 270 .169* 910 1350 .006 .031 90 .056 50 .031* 180 .156* 130 .144 70 100 150 .094 270 .169* 350 .219 300 .188 WBR .106* WBR .019* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .782 .713 24. Irvine & Westcliff True Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBL 2 3200 NBR d 1600 SBT 2 3200 SBR d 1600 EBT 2 3200 EBR 0 0 WBT 2 3200 WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment M PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 100 .031 290 .091* 920 .288* 630 .197 20 .013 10 .006 340 .106* 150 .047 650 .203 810' .253* 160 .100 470 .294 390 .122* 350 .109* 430 .169 580 .244 4200 20 .0147* 880 .306* 50 100 SBR .041* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION (Dlq 663 .800 25. Dover & Westcliff True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 3200 310 460 .097* 900 700 .281* .219 NBT NBR 2 0 .144 SBT 1 1600 440 .275* 380 30 .238* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 .019 3200 80 .025* 160 .050* EBT EBR 0 f 660 1000 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY U1ILILA11UN 26. Dover & 16th True Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 2 3200 NBR d 1600 SBR d 1600 EBT 0.5 1600 EBR d 1600 WBR 1 1600 Right Turn Adjustment AM HV/C HOUR VOL L VOPK L 110 .069* 240 .150* 820 1360 .013 .038 5o .031 50 .031 1130 1050 .019* .031* 20 20 03* 290 .1181 240 .1150 30 10 .006* .019* 50 .031 50 .031 EBR .162* EBR .119* GA7 TOTAL CAPACITY U11L1LA11UN 6 27. Dover & Coast Hw. True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 20 .013 NBT 1 1600 60 .038* 70 .044* NBR 1 1600 50 .031 40 .025 SBL 3 4800 860 .179* 1090 .227* SBT 1 1600 50 .031 70 .044 SBR 1 1600 70 .044 140 .088 EBL 2 3200 70 .022 70 .022* EBT 3 4800 2780 .588* 2140 .450 EBR 0 0 40 20 WBL 1 1600 60 .038* 110 .069 WBT 3 4800 1770 .369 2820 .588* WBR f 720 1480 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .843 .881 28. Bayside & Coast Hw. True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2.5 480 540 NBT 0.5 4800 20 .106* 20 .123* NBR 0 10 30 SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 160 .100* SBT 1 1600 20 .013 30 019 SBR d 1600 60 .038 140 .088 EBL 1 1600 110 .069 150 .094* EBT 3 4800 3110 .648* 2400 .500 EBR 1 1600 490 .306 690 .431 WBL 1 1600 50 .031* 30 .019 WBT 4 6400 1950 .323, 3790 .614* WBR 0 0 120 140 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .007* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .823 .931 016 29. MacArthur & Jamboree True Minimum LANES CAPACITY 4800 NBT 3 NBR 1 1600 4800 SBT 3 SBR f 4800 EBT 3 EBR f 4800 WBT 3 WBR f AM PK HOUR VOL V/C 170 .053 1990 .415* 520 .325 120 .038* 470 098 100 560 .175 1930 .402* 130 360 .113* 910 .190 180 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 30. Jamboree & Bristol (N) True Minimum PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 200 .063* 500 .313 270 .084 1670 .348* 460 230 .072 13660 .283* 930 .291* 1560 .325 170 .968 .96b AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V'/C NBL 2 3200 1240 .388 1020 .319* NBR 4800 3390 .706* 2480 .517 0 SBT SBL 2.5 6400 670 .186 1470 .359* SBR 1.5 520 830 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION oil .706 .b/0 31. Bayview Place & Bristol (S) True Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBL 0 NBT 0 NBR 2 3200 SBL 0 SBT 0 SBR 0 0 EBT 4 6400 EBR 1 1600 WBL WBT 0 0 WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 0 0 0 0 80 .025 360 .113 0 0 0 0 0 0 3630 .567* 3280 .513* 120 .075 10 .006 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR .025* NBR .113* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .592 .626 32. Jamboree & Bristol (S) True Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 5 8000 NBR 0 0 SBT 3 4800 SBR 0 0 41�4&i. EBR 1.5 4800 2 3200 WBL 0 WBT 0 WBR 0 0 AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 0 0 2310 .295* 2540 .331* 50 110 0 0 640 .133 1490 .310 2150 .672* 960' 600 .375 1500 .513* 990 .309 1170 .366 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 0�19 .967 .844 33. Jamboree & Bayview Way True Minimum LANES CAPACITY 6400 NBT 4 NBR 0 SBR 1 1600 EBR 1 1600 1600 WBR 1 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR VOLPK HOUR VOL UUC 150 21880 .094 .355* 70 2480 .044 .394* 100 .063* 140 .088* 184 .216 2480 1870 .106 .050 40 .025 180 .113 b0 .031 130 .081 Multi .044* Multi .179* cno TOTAL CAPACITY UIIL1LAiiun 34. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Univ. True Minimum .Yol AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 1210 .038 50 1300 .031 NBR 1 1600 .131* .188* SBL 2 3200 90 1280 .028* 380 1370 .119* 3 B SR 1 1 600 .175 .290 11 EBT 0.5 3200 120 .194* 100 10 .097* EBR 1 1600 10 .006 .006 WBT 1.5 4800 270 400 .063 420 .060* WBR f Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing con TOTAL CAPACITY UI1L1[A11Un W 35. Jamboree & Bison True Minimum AM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C NBT 3 4800 1620 .338* NBR d 1600 310 .194 SBL 2 3200 90 .028* SBT 3 4800 1270 .265 SBR 1 1600 50 .031 EBL 1 1600 110 .069* EBR 11 1600 80 .050 WBL 2 3200 210 .066* WBR 3 3200 220 .069 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .003* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 36. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Ford PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 1880 .392* 170 .106 160 050* 1790 ,056 40 .025* 10 .006 360 .113* 200 .063 504 .580 True Minimum HV/C HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 2 3200 370 .116* 390 .122* NBT 3 4800 1730 .408 1980 .492 NBR 0 0 230 380 SBL 2 3200 60 .019 60 .019 SBT 3 4800 1600 .333* 2110 .440* SBR 1 1600 60 .038 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 170 .106 50 .031 EBT 1 1600 210 .131* 120 .075* EBR f 420 330 WBL 1.5 370 270 WBT 1.5 4800 510 .183* 150 .088* WBR 1 1600 80 .050 30 .019 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ozo .763 .725 37. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 3 1600 4800 30 1450 .019 .302* 80 1910 .050 .398* NBT NBR 14 SBL 2 3200 590 1640 .184* 480 2200 .150* SBR 1 1600 .025 .125 EBT 1.5 4800 280 40 .088* .025 90 30 .028* .019 EBR 1 1600 50 .031 40 .025 1 1600 10 .006* 250 .031* WBT WBR f 410 680 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing rr� TOTAL CAPACITY W iLILAIluN our- 38. Jamboree & Santa Barbara True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 1210 .006 10 11100 .006 NBR 1 1600 .131* .063* SBL 2 3 3200 4800 390 1260 .122* .263 270 2010 .084* .419 SBT SBR 1 1600 10 .006 30 .019 EBL 1 1 1600 1600 60 .038* .025 20 10 .013 .019* EBR 30 WBT 0.5 3200 120 0 .028* 500 20 .163* WBR 1 1600 60 .038 350 .219 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .010* WBR .056* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY W ILILAItun .ULM. 39. Jamboree & Coast Hw. True Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 2 3200 NBR 0 0 SBT 2 3200 SBR f EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR 4 6400 0 0 4 6400 f AM'PK HOUR VOL V/C 620 019 .231* 120 200 .125* .088 0 1300 .271* 2210 .347 130 .041 1430 .223* 100 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 40. Santa Cruz & San Joaquin H. True Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 1 1600 NBR 0 0 SBT 1 100166 600 SBR 1 1600 EBT 3 4800 EBR 0 0 WBT 3 4800 WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION PM PK HOUR VOL V/C .0144* 360 100 230 .144* 750 .234 2140 880 .183* 1750 .283 320 .100 2560 .400* 160 .850 .871 AM PK HOUR VOL V/C 28 10 .025* 30 20 .013* 70 .044 410 .028 17* 200 230 .144* 320 .073 SBR .034* 017 . PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 400 .125 10 .144* 220 10 .006* 60 .038 110 .069* 370 .116 190 .119 80 .106 4* 30 SBR .013* 343 .338 41. Santa Rosa & San Joaquin H. True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 130 .081* NBT 1 1600 10 .006* 20 .013 NBR 1 1600 210 .131 740 .463 SBL 1 1600 120 .075* 110 .069 SBT 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006* SBR 1 1600 20 .013 50 .031 EBL 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 EBR 4800 300 .073* 610 .144* 0 5080 WBL 2 3200 760 .238* 530 .166* 3 4800 540 .135 2490 .069 WBR Right Turn Adjustment Multi .304* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 42. Newport Center & Coast Hw. 392 701 True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 0 0 NBT 0 0 0 0 NBR SBL 2 3200 30 .009* 310 .097* SBT 0 0 0 0 SBR f 90 840 EBL 2 3200 600 .188* 360 .113* EBT 3 4800 1870 .390 1730 .360 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBT 3 4800 1450 .302* 1950 .406* WBR f 200 160 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 01,3. .499 616 44. Avocado & San Miguel True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 140 .088 60 .038 NBT 1 1600 180 .113* 30 .019* NBR 1 1600 70 .044 600 .375 SBL 1 1600 40 .025* 240 .150* SBT 1 1600 40 .025 160 .100 SBR 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 EBT 2 3200 120 .047 700 .253* EBR 0 0 30 110 WBL 2 3200 510 .159 400 .125* WBT 2 3200 530 .234* 630 .209 WBR' 0 0 220 40 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .231* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 45. Avocado & Coast Hw. 378 .778 True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 110 .069* 150 .094* NBT 1 1600 40 .025 100 .063 NBR 1 1600 260 .163 150 .094 SBL 1.5 70 .044 330 SBT 0.5 3200 70 .044* 160 .153* SBR 1 1600 40 .025 310 .194 EBL 1 1600 350 .219* 150 .094 EBT 3 4800 1530 .319 1830 .381* EBR d 1600 60 .038 80 .050 WBL 1 1600 150 .094 190 .119* WBT 3 4800 1700 .354* 1700 .354 WBR 1 1600 130 .081 80 .050 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .094* SBR .041* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ozy .780 .788 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison True Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBL 1.5 NBT 0 4800 NBR 1.5 SBL 0 0 SBT SBR 0 0 3200 EBT 2 EBR 0 0 WBT 2 3200 WBR 1 1600 Right Turn Adjustment AM VOL HOUR L 220 {.117}* .117 340 0 0 06 1140 .356* 0 0 190 .1119 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison True Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBL 0 0 NBT 0 0 NBR 0 0 SBL 2 3200 SBT 0 0 SBR f EBT 2 3200 EBR 1 1600 2 3200 WBT WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment. TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 260 .081* 0 90 .056 0 0, 10 .006* 550 .172 0 760 .200* 475 WBR .275* .473 .562 AM VOL HOUR L 0 0 0 850 .266 10 0 300 160 .1100 290 .091 0 EBR .006 07-5 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 0 0 0 280 .088* 0 70 0 130 .081 630 .01978* 0 .385 .Z85 48. MacArthur & Bison True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 340 .106 280 .088* NBT 4 6400 3450 .539* 2680 .419 NBR f 200 130 SBL 2 3200 100 .031* 40 .013 SBT 4 6400 2530 .395 3200 .500* SBR. 1 1600 330 .206 430 .269 EBL 2 3200 280 .088* 270 .084* 3200 .113 1800 .056 EBR f 26600 WBL 2 3200 180 .056 210 .066 WBT 2 3200 360 .113* 410 .128* WBR 1 1600 130 .081 60 .038 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 49. MacArthur & Ford/Bonita Cyn .771 .800 True Minimum HV/C HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 2 3200 140 .044 80 .025 NBT 4 6400 2000 .313* 2400 .375* NBR f 120 430 SBL 2 3200 600 .188* 1350 .422* SBT 6400 26900 .420 246600 .384 SBR f EBL 2 3200 40 .013 10 .003 EBT 2 3200 390 .122* 580 .181* EBR 1 1600 80 .050 120 .075 WBL 2 3200 460 .144* 250 .078* WBT 2 3200 750 .234 390 .122 WBR f 1650 780 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Q2(D 767 1.056 50. MacArthur & San Joaquin H. True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 70 .022 30 .009 NBT 3 4800 1530 .319* 1860 .388* NBR 1 1600 10 ."006 20 .013 SBL 2 3200 550 .172* 750 .234* SBT 3 4800 1620 .338 1970 .410 SBR f 1070 520 EBL 2 3200 230 .072* 930 .291* EBT 3 4800 300 .071 750 .177 EBR 100 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBR 3200 650 .203* 350 .109*440 f TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 51. MacArthur & San Miguel True Minimum 766 1.022 AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 .044 160 .050* NBT 3 4800 1510 .315* 980 .204 NBR 1 1600 310 .194 450 .281 SBL 2 3200 10 .003* 10 .003 SBT 3 4800 1000 .208 1510 .315* SBR 1 1600 700 .438 570 .356 EBL 2 3200 80 .025 930 .291* EBT 2 3200 110 .053* 500 .203 EBR 0 0 60 150 WBL 2 3200 340 .106* 280 .088 WBT 2 3200 380 .119 340 .106* WBR d 1600 20 .013 30 .019 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .139* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .616 oz-7 /b2 52. MacArthur & Coast Hw. True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 0 0 NBT NBR 0 0 0 0 SBL 2 3200 550 .172* 840 .263* 0 SBR f 410 760 EBL 2 3200 840 .263* 660 .206* 4800 1010 .210 1540 .321 EBR 0 WBT 3 4800 1440 .300* 1600 .333* WBR f 850 640 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 53. SR•73 NB Ramps & Bonita Cyn True Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 3200 0 NBR 1 1600 SBL 0 SBT 0 SBR 0 0 EBT 2 3200 EBR 1 1600 WBT 2 3200 WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment 735 .802 AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 560 .175* 80 .025* 370 .231 130 081 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 890 .278* 1060 .331* 90 .056 10 .006 570 .178* 340 .106* 1040 .325 1120 .350 NBR .056* NBR .056* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ME .687 518 54. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Cyn True Minimum LANES CAPACITY 3200 NBT 0 NBR 1 1600 SBT 0 0 SBR 0 0 EBT 2 3200 EBR 1 1600 4800 WBT 3 WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 40 .013* 280 .088* 240 .150 240 .150 0 0 0 0 0 0 710 .222 800 .250* 190 .119 560 .350 190 .059 210 .066* 1430 .298* 990 .206 NBR .137* Multi .162* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 55. Spyglass Hill & San Miguel .448 .566 True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 40 30 {.0191* NBT 1 1600 40 .050* 20 .031 NBR d 1600 160 .100 180 .113 SBL 0 0 50 {.0311* 20 SBT 1 1600 30 .050 30 .031* SBR 1 1600 40 .025 30 .019 EBL 1 1600 50 .031 70 .044 EBT 2 3200 340 .106* 530 .166* EBR d 1600 30 .019 50 .031 WBL 1 1600 100 .063* 140 .088* WBT 2 3200 430 .134 460 .144 WBR d 1600 30 .019 40 .025 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .050* NBR .075* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION (0Z1 300 379 56. San Miguel & San Joaquin H. True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 0 .000 NBT 2 3200 250 .116* 550 .288* NBR 0 0 120 370 SBL 1 1600 70 .044* 150 .094* SBT 2 3200 480 .150 360 .113 SBR 1 1600 400 .250 150 094 EBL 2 3200 300 .094* 520 .163* 4800 5i0 .121 820 .173 EBR 0 10 WBL 2 3200 450 .141 260 .081 WBT 3 4800 1150 .258* 570 .131* WBR 0 0 90 60 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .002* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 57. Goldenrod & Coast Hw. True Minimum 514 676 AM PK HOUR PM'PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 130 .081* 60 .038* 1600 .025 30 .025 NBR 0 30 SBT 1 1600 10 .088* 10 .038* SBR 0 0 60 20 EBL 1 1600 20 .013* 30 .019 EBT 2 3200 1210 .378 2080 .650* EBR d 1600 30 .019 70 .044 WBL 1 1600 40 .'025 30 .019* WBT 2 3200 2800 .875* 1820 .569 WBR d 1600 10 .006 10 .006 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1.057 .745 030 58. Marguerite & San Joaquin H. True Minimum AM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C NBL 250 NBT 0.5 3200 .106* NBR 1 1600 30 .019 SBL 1 1600 60 .038 SBT 1 1600 40 .044* SBR 0 0 30 EBL 1 1600 20 .013* EBT 2 3200. 420 .131 EBR 1 1600 110 .069 WBL 1 1600 30 .019 WBT 3 4800 1060 .221* WBR d 1600 90 .056 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 59. Marguerite & Coast Hw. 384 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 170 60 .038 50 .056* 40 4025 940 .294* 320 .200 110 .069* 640 .133 50 .031 491 True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 140 .088* 160 .100* NBT 1 1600 100• .113 120 .131 NBR 0 0 80 90 SBL 1 1600 60 .038 130 .081 SBT 1 1600 60 .100* 110 .113* SBR 0 0 100 70 EBL 1 1600 80 .050* 100 .063 EBT 2 3200 1350 .422 1970 .616* EBR 1 1600 60 .038 120 .075 WBL 1 1600 •50 .031 110 .069* WBT 2 3200 2040 .644* 1600 .513 WBR 0 0 20 40 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 031 M. 60. Spyglass H. & San Joaquin H. True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 NBT 1 1600 0 .013* 10 .025* NBR 0 0 20 30 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 40 .025* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR d 1600 260 .163 140 .088 EBL 1 1600 80 .050* 230 .144* EBT 2 3200 620 .194 980 .306 EBR 1 1600 20 .013 60 .038 WBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 2 3200 1080 .338* 610 .191* WBR d 1600 70 .044 70 .044 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .150* SBR .069* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .589 .454 61. Poppy & Coast Hw. True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 20 .013* 20 .013 NBT 1 1600 10 .019 10 .038* NBR 0 0 20 50 SBL 0 0 50 120 {.075}* SBT 1 1600 10 .044* 10 .088 SBR 0 0 10 10 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 20 .013 EBT 2 3200 1380 .434 1970 .619* EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013* WBT 2 3200 1940 .613* 1700 .538 WBR 0 0 20 20 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 037. .676 rZR 62. Newport Coast & SR-73 NB True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM'PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 2 3200 1300 .406* 800 .250 NBR f 500 240 SBT 2 3200 430 .134 940 .294* SBR 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 EBR WBL 1.5 290 260 WBT 0 3200 0 .131* 0 .100* WBR 0.5 130 60 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 64. Newport Coast & San Joaquin 537 .394 True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 .044 140 .044* 4800 1510 .315* 700 .146 NBR 0 SBT 3 4800 740 .154 1110 .231* SBR 1 1600 130 .081 370 .231 EBL 1 1600 500 .313* 290 .18'1* EBR 2 3200 90 .028 130 .041 WBL 0 0 0 0 WBT' WBR 0 0 0 0 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION p33 628 .4bb 65. Newport Coast & Coast Hw. True Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBL 2 3200 290 .091* 780 .244* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR f 200 230 EBL 1 1600 270 .169* 140 .088* EBT 3 4800 970 .202 1660 .346 EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 4800 14660 .304* 1270 .265* WBR f Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 03y .570 603 APPENDIX P ' TRUE MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS WITH IMPROVEMENTS II II ,1 2. Superior & Placentia True Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 2 3200 NBR 1 1600 3200 SBT 2 SBR d 1600 EBT 2 3200 EBR d 1600 WBT 1.5 3200 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR VOL V/C 430 .269 1520 .013* 450 .141 10 .006 10 006 490 .* 350 .219 (.150 390 70 EBR .066* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION P3 .737 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 310 .194* 640 .025 1060 .338* 10 .006 10 .006* 500 .313 400 4 .203* 180 EBR .123* 3. Superior & Coast Hw. True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 250 .156 450 NBT 1.5 4800 530 .166* 370 .171* NBR 1 1600 70 .044 110 .069 SBL 1.5 190 210 SBT 1.5 4800 170 .075* 380 .123* SBR 2 3200 240 .075 930 .291 EBL 2 3200 1540 .481* 450 .141* EBT 4 6400 3350 .523 1320 .206 EBR d 1600 260 .163 280 .175 WBL 1 1600 50 .031 210 .131 WBT 5 8000 790 .099* 2930 .366* WBR d 1600 200 .125 150 .094 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .026* SBR .027* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 4. Newport & Hospital .847 .828 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBC 2 3200 280 .088 270 .084* NBT 3 4800 1840 .383* 1630 .340 NBR 1 1600 90 .056 70 .044 SBL 1 1600 140 .088* 40 .025 SBT 3 4800 1180 .246 2160 .450* SBR d 1600 470 294 250 .156 EBL 2 3200 270 .084 480 .150 EBT 1 1600 400 .250* 340 .213* EBR 1 1600 160 .100 180 .113 WBL 1 1600 110 069* 210 .131* 32000 3600 .116 2400 .081 WBR p TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Py im 5. Newport & Via Lido True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 3 4800 1860 .388* 1090 .227 NBR 1 1600 10 .006 40 .025 SBL 2 3200 390 .122* 450 .141 SBT 3 4800 770 .160 1770 .369* SBR 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 WBL 1 1600 10 .006* 50 .031* WBR 2 3203 380 .119 580 .181 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .009* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 6. Newport & 32nd .516 AW True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 20 .013* NBT 3 4800 1140 .238* 760 .158 NBR d 1600 20 .013 30 .019 SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 90 .056 SBT 2 3200 690 .247 1220 .478* SBR 0 0 100 310 EBL 1.5 490 150 EBT 0.5 3200 30 .163* 40 .059* EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 0.5 40 .025* 30 1.5 3200 .019 .028* WBR 130 150 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 457 578 s . 7. Riverside & Coast Hw. True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL O1 10 NBT 1600 .013* 10 .019* NBR d 1600 0 .000 10 .006 SBL 0.5 110 {.0691* 70 {.0441* SBR 0.5 1600 .075 .050 310 510 EBL 1 1600 410 .256 340 .213* EBT 3 4800 2940 .615* 2070 .435 EBR 0 0 10 20 WBL 1 1600 10 .006* 50 .031 WBT 4 6400 1630 .255 3690 .577* WBR 1 1600 50 .031 40 .025 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION B. Tustin & Coast Hw. 703 .853 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 10 {.0061* 10 {0061* NBT 1 1600 10 .019 10 .619 NBR 0 0 10 10 SBL 01 SBT 1600 10 .081* 10 .088* SBR 0 0 30 40 EBL 1 1600 10 .006 110 .069* 4800 2930 .613* 1990 .417 EBR 0 10 10 WBL 0 0 0 0 WBT 3 4800 • 1730 .360 3190 .665* WBR 1 1600 60 .038 110 .069 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 10 .700 .828 9. MacArthur & Campus True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 140 .088 310 .194* NBT 4 6400 1320 .206* 1420 .222 NBR 1 1600 110 .069 100 .063 SBL 1 1600 250 .156* 150 .094 SBT 4 6400 1070 .167 1300 .203* SBR f 480 920 EBL 2 3200 820 .256* 530 .166* E21 1190 120 BR d 1600 .119 .075 WBL 2 3200 120 .038 150 .047 WBBT 4800 5220 .108* 14990 .310* f TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 10. MacArthur & Birch 726 8/3 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 170 .106* NBT 3 4800 1220 .254* 1000 .208 NBR 1 1600 120 .075 70 .044 SBL 1 1600 240 .150* 130 .081 SBT 4 6400 800 .167 1150 .222* SBR 0 0 330 .206 270 EBL 1.5 460 400 1.5 4800 560 .223* 390 .175* EEBT BR WBL 1 1600 40 .025 130 .081 3200 240 .075* 940 .294* WBWBT f Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Q1 .702 797 11. Von Karman & Campus True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .-006* 3200 780 .244* 630 .197 NBR f 40 SBL 1 1600 40 .025* 180 .113 SBT 2 3200 550 .206 1050 .406* SBR 0 0 110 250 EBL 1 1600 340 .213* 250 .156* EBT 2 3200 710 .222 910 .284 EBR 1 1600 50 .031 30 .019 WBL 1 1600 60 .038 40 .025 WBT 2 3200 420 .131* 1040 .325* WBR 1 1600 80 .050 140 .088 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 12. MacArthur & Von Karman 613 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 160 .100 50 .031* NBT 3 4800 1400 .292* 870 .181 NBR 1 1600 560 .350 200 .125 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 90 .056 SBT 3 4800 570 .119 1190 .248* SBR 1 1600 190 .119 110 .069 EBL 1 1600 40 .025* 150 .094 EBT 2 3200 160 .050 290 .091* EBR 130 WBL 2 3200 150 .047 860 .269* WBT 1600 210 .131* 210 .131 WBR f 100 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .058* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .544 .639 13. Jamboree & Campus True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 50 .031 110 .069* NBT 4 6400 2300 .359* 1780 .278 NBR f 210 740 SBL 2 3200 660 .206* 370 .116 SBT 4 6400 1540 .241 2730 .427* SBR 1 1600 340 .213 330 .206 EBL 3 4900 200 .042 700 .146 3200 320 .100* 830 .259* EBR f 10 WBL 2 3200 750 .234* 340 .106* 3200 740 .231 640 ..200490 WBR f TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 14. Jamboree & Birch .899 .861 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 380 .238* 120 .075 4800 22180 .477 1750 .383* NBR 0 SBL 1 1600 10 .006 110 .069* 6400 18810 •283* 2190 .342 SBR f EBL 1.5 160 640 EBT 0.5 3200 120 .088* 40 .213* EBR f 10 380 WBT 1 1600 60 .188* 160 .137* WBR 0 0 190 10 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .797 .802 7g 15. Campus & Bristol (N) True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 510 .159 580 .181* NBT 3 4800 3190 .665* 1570 .327 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBT 4.5 11200 410 .063 1900 .282* SBR 2.5 300 1260 EBL 0 0 0 0 EBT EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 2 3200 320 .100 450 .141 WBT 5 8000 1540 .193* 3070 .384* WBR 1 1600 350 .219 130 .081 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .026* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .884 .847 16. Birch & Bristol (N) True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 130 .041 170 .053* NBT 3 4800 1390 .290* 430 .090 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBT 11.5 6400 150 .063 780 .366* SBR 2.5 250 1560 EBL 0 0 0 0 EBT EBR, 0 0 0 0 WBL 1.5 410 520 WBT 3.5 8000 1560 .246* 1750 .284* WBR 1 1600 790 .494 110 .069 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .248* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .784 .703 P10 17. Campus/Irvine & Bristol (S) True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 5 8000 2350 .294* 1700 .213* NBR 1 1600 450 .281 420 .263 SBL 1 1600 100 .063* 340 .213* 4800 630 .131 2010 .419 SBR p EBL 1.5 1360 {.497)* 460 {.280}* EBT 2.5 6400 1820 .497 1330 .280 EBR 2 3200 620 .194 590 .184 0 WBR 0 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .050* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 18. Birch & Bristol (S) 854 756 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 2.5 6400 560 .155* 250 .078 NBR 1.5 430 350 .109 SBL 2 3200 180 .056* 400 .125 SBT 2 3200 370 .116 910 .284* SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 1.5 960 {.305}* 280 33.5 8000 13080 .305 1550 .244* EEBT BT WBR 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .516 pit 528 19. Irvine & Mesa True Minimum With Improvements HOUR HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLK NBL. 1 1600 90 .056 50 .031* NBT 3 4800 1960 .408* 930 .194 NBR 1 1600 660 .413 190 .119 SBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 SBT 3 4800 960 .200 2150 .448* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 200 .125 EBL 1.5 330 90 EBT 1.5 4800 390 .150* 70 .033* EBR 1 1600 40 .025 240 .150 WBL 1.5 150 470 WBT 4800 700 .048* 5800 .221* WBR 0,5 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .005* EBR .117* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL. CAPACITY UTILIZATION 20. Irvine & University 617 .850 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 180 .113 210 .131* NBT 3 4800 2420 .504* 1070 .223 NBR 1 1600 60 .038 20 .013 SBL 1 1600 90 .056* 40 .025 SBT 3 4800 940 .196 2650 .552* SBR 1 1600 130 .081 380 .238 EBL 1.5 510 .159* 230 .072* EBT 1.5 4800 120 .075 30 .019 EBR d 1600 240 .150 140 .088 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBT 1 1600 30 .019* 90 .056* WBR d 1600 20 013 50 .031 Right Turn Adjustment EBR .016* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ML 738 .827 21. Irvine & Santiago True Minimum With Improvements LANES CAPACITY 4800 NBT 3 NBR 0 0 SBL 1 1600 SBT 3 4800 SBR d 1600 01 EBT 1600 EBR d 1600 WBL 0 0 WBT 1 1600 WBR d 1600 Right Turn Adjustment VOL V/C 90 .056 1490 .313* 10 920 .1192 40 .025 140 {.125}* 130 .081 20 60 .050* 160 .100 WBR .050* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 22. Irvine & Highland True Minimum With Improvements LANES CAPACITY 1600 NBR d SBL 1 1600 SBT 2 3200 SBR d 1600 EBT 11 1600 EBR d 1600 WBL 0 0 1600 WBR d Right Turn Adjustment .538 VOL V/C 1590 .497* 10 .006 20 .013* 1120 .013 {.056 110 120 .075 20 20 .025* 60 .038 Multi .025* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION P13 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 150 .094* 1130 .240 20 1069 1800 .375* 120 .075 70 .6817 0 150 .094 10 90 .063* 70 .044 bb9 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 80 .050* 1320 .013 30 .019 1690 .528* 70 .044 220 t0262}*I 70 .044 10 50 .038* 20 .013 610 .bZb I 23. Irvine & Dover True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 NBT 2 3200 1260 .394* 1040 .325* NBR d 1600 20 .013 20 .013 SBL 1 1600 180 .113* 270 .169* SBT 2 3200 920 .288 1390 .434 SBR d 1600 10 .006 50 .031 EBL. 1 1600 90 .056 50 .031* 1600 180 .156* 130 .144 EBR 0 WBL 1 1600 20 .013* 40 .025 WBT 1 1600 150 .094 270 .169* WBR 1 1600 350 .219 300 .188 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .106* WBR .019* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 24. Irvine & Westcliff .782 713 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 100 .031 290 .091* NBT 2 3200 920 .288* 630 .197 NBR d 1600 20 .013 10 .006 SBL 2 3200 340 .106* 150 .047 SBT 2 3200 650 .203 810 .253* SBR d 1600 160 .100 470 .294 EBL 2 3200 390 .122* 350 .109* EBT 2 3200 430 .169 580 .244 EBR 0 0 110 200 WBL 1 1600 30 .019 90 .056 WBT 2 3200 420 .147* 880 .306* WBR 0 0 50 100 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .041* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION PH .663 11 25. Dover & Westcliff True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 310 .097* 900 .281* NBT 2 3200 460 .144 700 .219 NBR 0 0 0 0 01 SBT 1600 440 .275* 380 .238* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 30 .019 3200 80 .025* 160 .050* EBT 0 EBR f 660 1000 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 26. Dover & 16th True Minimum With Improvements LANES CAPACITY 3200 NBT 2 NBR d 1600 1600 SBR d EBL EBT 0.5 1600 EBR d 1600 1600 WBT 1 WBR 1 1600 Right Turn Adjustment .397 . bb9 VOL V/C VOL V/U 110 .069* 240 .150* 820 1360 .013 .038 1170 ..031 366* 1030 .322* 30 .019 50 .031 10 .019* 30 .031* 290 .181 240 .150 * * 10 .006 30 .019 50 .031 50 .031 EBR .162* EBR .119* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION pis, 641 .b4/ 27. Dover & Coast Hw. True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 20 .013 NBT 1 1600 60 .038* 70 .044* NBR 1 1600 50 .031 40 .025 SBL 3 4800 860 .179* 1090 .227* SBT 1 1600 50 .031 70 .044 SBR 1 1600 70 .044 140 .088 EBL 2 3200 70 .022 70 .022* 4800 27840 .588* 2120 .450 EBR 0 WBL 1 1600 60 .038* 110 .069 WBT 3 4800 1770 .369 2820 .588* WBR f 720 1480 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 28. Bayside & Coast Hw. .843 .881 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2.5 480 540 NBTNBR 4800 20 .106* 30 .123* 0.5 SBL 1.5 50 160 SBT 0.5 3200 20 .022* 30 .059* SBR 1 1600 60 .038 140 .088 EBL 1 1600 110 .069 150 .094* EBT 3 4800 3110 .648* 2400 .500 EBR 1 1600 490 .306 690 .431 WBL 1 1600 50 .031* 30 .019 WBT 4 6400 1950 .323 3790 .614* WBR 0 0 120 140 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .807 .890 29. MacArthur & Jamboree True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 170 .053 200 .063* NBT 4 6400 1990 .311* 830 .130 NBR 1 1600 520 .325 500 .313 SBL 2 3200 120 .038* 270 .084 SBBT 3 4800 400 098 1670 .348* R EBL 2 3200 560 .175 230 .072 EBT 4800 1930 .402* 13660 .283* EBR f 130 WBL 3 4800 360 .075* 930 .194* WBT 4800 910 .190 1560 .325 WBR 3 170 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .014* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 30. Jamboree & Bristol (N) :1i True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 1240 .388 1020 .319* NBR 4800 3390 .706* 2480 .517 0 SBL SBT 2.5 6400 670 .186 1470 .359* SBR 1.5 520 830 EBL 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 WBR 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ply 706 3f? 31, Bayview Place & Bristol (S) True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBR 2 3200 80 .025 360 113 SBT 0 0 0 0 SBR EBT 4 6400 3630 .567* 3280 .513* EBR 1 1600 120 .075 10 .006 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR Right Turn Adjustment NBR .025* NBR .113* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 32. Jamboree & Bristol (S) .592 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C 800 0 23 5 0NBR .295* 254 0 .331* 0 SBR 4800 640 .133 1490 .310 0 EBL 2.5 2150 .448* 960 .300 EBT 1.5 6400 600 375 1500 .469* EBR 2 3200 990 .309 1170 .366 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 743 .800 33. Jamboree & Bayview Way True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY 6400 NBT 4 NBR 0 0 6400 SBT 4 SBR 1 1600 1600 EBR 1 1600 WBR 1 Right Turn Adjustment VOL V/C VOL V/C 150 .094 70 .044 2180 .355* 2440 .394* 90 80 100 .063* 140 .088* 1380 .216 2460 .384 170 .106, 80 .050 10 0 40 .0225 1806 .11113 50 .031 130 .081 Multi .044* Multi .179* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 34. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Univ. 481 .69b True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 NBT 3 4800 1640 .342* 1940 .404* NBR 1 1600 210 .131 300 .188 SBL 2 3200 90 .028* 380 .119* SBT 3 4800 1090 .227 1960 .408 SBR 1 1600 280 .175 370 .231 EBL 1.5 500 210 EBT 0.5 3200 120 .194* 100 .097* EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 1.5 270 .084* 190 WBT 4800 400 .063 100 .060* WBR f.5 42 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .648 't 1 M9 .:f 35. Jamboree & Bison True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 3 4800 1620 .338* 1880 .392* NBR d 1600 310 .194 170 .106 SBL 2 3200 90 .028* 160 .050* SBT 3 4800 1270 .265 1730 .360 SBR 1 1600 50 .031 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 110 .069* 40 .025* EBT 0 EBR 1600 80 .050 10 .006 WBL 2 3200 210 .066* 360 .113* WBR 2 3200 220 .069 200 .063 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .003* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 36. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Ford .504 .580 True Minimum With Improvements HV/C PM K HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLO NBL 2 3200 370 .116* 390 .122* NBT 3 4800 1730 .408 1980 .492 NBR 0 0 230 380 SBL 2 3200 60 .019 60 .019 SBT 3 4800 1600 .333* 2110 .440* SBR 1 1600 60 .038 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 170 .106 50 .031 EBT 1 1600 210 .131* 120 075* EBR f 420 330 WBL 1.5 370 270 WBT 1.5 4800 510 .183* 150 .088* WBR 1 1600 80 .050 30 .019 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 763 .725 I I I n I 37. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 80 .050 4800 1450 .302* 1910 .398* NBR f 140 SBL 2 3200 590 .184* 480 .150* SBT 3 4800 1610 .335 2270 .473 SBR 1 1600 40 .025 200 .125 EBL 1.5 280 .088* 90 .028* EBT 1.5 4800 40 .025 30 .019 EBR 1 1600 50 .031 40 .025 WBL 2 3200 90 .028* 240 .075* WBT 1600 .006 .031 WBR f 410 6550 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 38. Jamboree & Santa Barbara .602 651 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 3 4800 1650 .344* 1850 .385* NBR 1 1600 210 .131 100 .063 SBL 2 3200 390 .122* 270 .084* SBT 3 4800 1260 .263 2010 .419 SBR 1 1600 10 .006 30 .019 EBL 1 1600 60 .038* 20 .013 1600 .025 20 .019* EEBT BR 0 30 WBL 1.5 80 500 WBT 0.5 3200 10 .028* 20 .163* WBR 1 1600 60 .038 350 .219 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .010* WBR .056* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .542 707 39. Jamboree & Coast Hw. True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 30 .019 NBT 2 3200 620 .231* 360 .144* NBR 0 0 120 100 SBL 1 1600 200 .125* 230 .144* SBT 2 3200 280 .088 750 .234 SBR f 920 2140 EBL 3 4800 1300 .271* 880 .183* 6400 2210 .347 1760 .283 EBR 0 WBL 2 3200 130 .041 320 .100 WBT 6400 1430 .223* 2160 .400* WBR f TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 40. Santa Cruz & San Joaquin H. .850 .871 True Minimum With Improvements HV/C VOLpK "V/C LANES CAPACITY VOLPK NBL 2 3200 90 .028 400 .125 NBT 1 1600 10 .025* 10 .144* NBR 0 0 30 220 SBL 1 1600 20 .013* 10 .006* SBT 1 1600 10, .006 10 .006 SBR 1 1600 70 .044 60 .038 EBL 1 1600 60 .038 110 .069* EBT 3 4800 410 .127* 370 .116 EBR 0 0 200 190 .119 WBL 1 1600 230 .144* 30 .019 WBT 3 4800 320 .073 480 .106* WBR 0 0 30 30 Right Turn Adjustment SgR .034* SBR .013* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .343 .338 Pz?- 41. Santa Rosa & San Joaquin H. True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 130 .081* NBT 1 1600 10 .006* 20 .013 NBR 1 1600 210 .131 740 .463 SBL 1 1600 120 .075* 110 .069 SBT 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006* SBR 1 1600 20 .013 50 .031 EBL 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 EBT 3 4800 300 .073* 610 .144* EBR 0 0 50 80 WBL 2 3200 760 .238* 530 .166* WBT 3 4800 540 .135 240 .069 WBR 0 0 110 90 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .304* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 42. Newport Center & Coast Hw. .392 .701 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 0 0 0 0 NBR SBT 3200 30 .009* 310 .097* 0 SBR f 90 840 EBL 2 3200 600 .188* 360 .113* EBT 3 4800 1870 .390 1730 .360 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBT 3 4800 1450 .302* 1950 .406* WBR f 200 160 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION PZ3 499 .616 44. Avocado & San Miguel True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 140 .088 60 .038 NBT 1 1600 180 .113* 30 .019* NBR 1 1600 70 .044 600 .375 SBL 1 1600 40 .025* 240 .150* SBT 1 1600 40 .025 160 .100 SBR 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 EBT 2 3200 120 .047 700 .253* EBR 0 0 30 110 WBL 2 3200 510 .159 400 .125* WBT 2 3200 530 .234* 630 .209 WBR 0 0 220 40 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .231* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 45. Avocado & Coast Hw. .378 .778 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 110 .069* 150 .094* NBT 1 1600 40 .025 100 .063 NBR 1 1600 260 .163 150 .094 SBL 1.5 70 .044 330 SBT 0.5 3200 70 .044* 160 .153* SBR 1 1600 40 .025 310 .194 EBL 1 1600 360 .219* 150 .094 EBT 3 4800 1530 .319 1830 .381* EBR d 1600 60 .038 80 .050 WBL 1 1600 150 .094 190 .119* WBT 3 4800 1700 .354* 1700 .354 WBR 1 1600 130 .081 80 .050 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .094* SBR .041* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION K4 .780 .788 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 220 {.117}* 260 .081* NBT 0 4800 0 .117 0 NBR 1.5 340 90 .056 0 SBT 0 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006* 3200 1140 .356* 550 .172 EBR 0 WBT 2 3200 110 .034 640 .200* WBR 1 1600 190 .119 760 .475 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .275* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison .473 .562 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 0 0 0 0 NBR SBT 2 3200 850 .266* 280 .088* SBR f 10 70 EBT 2 3200' 300 .094* 240 .075 EBR 1 1600 160 .100 130 .081 WBL 2 3200 60 .019* 280 .088 3200 290 .091 630 .197* WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment EBR .006* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION pzs .385 285 48. MacArthur & Bison True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 340 .106 280 .088* NBT 4 6400 3450 .539* 2680 .419 NBR f 200 130 SBL 2 3200 100 .031* 40 .013 SBT 4 6400 2530 .395 3200 .500* SBR 1 1600 330 .206 430 .269 EBL 2 3200 280 .088* 270 .084* 3200 3660 .113 180 .056 EBR f WBL 2 3200 180 .056 210 .066 WBT 2 3200 360 .113* 410 .128* WBR 1 1600 130 ..081 60 .038 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 49. MacArthur & Ford/Bonita Cyn 771 .800 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 .044* 80 .025 6400 2000 .313 24120 00 .375* NBR f SBL 3 4800 600 .125 1350 .281* SBT 4 6400 2690 .420* 2460 .394 SBR 1 1600 10 .006 60 .038 EBL 2 3200 40 .013* 10 .003 EBT 3 4800 390 .081 580 .121* EBR 1 1600 80 .050 120 .075 WBL 2 3200 460 .144 250 .078* WBT 2 3200 750 .234* 390 .122 WBR f 1650 780 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 04 .711 855 50. MacArthur & San Joaquin H. True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 70 .022 30 .009 NBT 4 6400 1530 .239* 1860 .291* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 20 .013 SBL 2 3200 550 .172* 750 .234* SBT 3 4800 1620 .338 1970 .410 SBR f 1070 520 EBL 3 4800 230 .048* 930 .194* 4800 300 .071 750 .177 EBR B WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 3200 650 .203* 350 .109* WBWBT f TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 51. MacArthur & San Miguel True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 .044 160 .050* NBT 3 4800 1510 .315* 980 .204 NBR 1 1600 310 .194 450 .281 SBL 2 3200 10 .003* 10 .003 SBT 3 4800 1000 .208 1510 .315* SBR 1 1600 700 .438 570 .356 EBL 2 3200 80 .025 930 .291* EBT 2 3200 160 .053* 500 .203 EBR 150 WBL 2 3200 340 .106* 280 .088 WBT 2 3200 380 .119 340 .106* WBR d 1600 20 .013 30 .019 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .139* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .616 pz-7 WVTY 52. MacArthur & Coast Hw. True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C 0 0 0 0 NNBL 0 0 0 0 NBT BR 3200 550 .172* 840 .263* SBT 0 SBR f 410 760 EBL 2 3200 840 .263* 660 .206* 4800 1010 .210 1540 .321 EBR 0 4800 14850 .300* 1640 .333* WBR f TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 53. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bonita Cyn .735 .802 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 560 .175* 80 .025* NBT NBR 1 1600 370 .231 130 .081 SBL 0 0 0 0 SBT 0 0 0 0 SBR EBT 2 3200 890 .278* 1060 .331* EBR 1 1600 90 .056 10 .006 WBL 2 3200 570 .178* 340 .106* WBT 2 3200 1040 .325 1120 .350 WBR 0 0 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .056* NBR .056* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION go .687 .518 I1 54. SR-73 SB'Ramps & Bonita Cyn True Minimum With Improvements LANES CAPACITY NBT 3200 0 NBR 1 1600 SBL 0 0 SBT 0 0 SBR 0 0 200 1 EBR 1 600 4800 WBT 3 WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 40 .013* 280 .088* 240 .150 240 .15D 0 0 0 0 0 0 710 .222 800 .250* 190 .119 560 .350 190 .059 210 .066* 1430 .298* 990 .206 NBR .137* Multi .162* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 55. Spyglass Hill & San Miguel F ., True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 40 30 {.019}* NBT 1 1600 40 .050* 20 .031 NBR d 1600 160 .100 180 .113 SBL 0 0 50 {.0311* 20 SBT 1 1600 30 .050 30 .031* SBR 1 1600 40 .025 30 .019 EBL 1 1600 50 .031 70 .044 EBT 2 3200 340 .106* 530 .166* EBR d 1600 30 .019 50 .031 WBL 1 1600 100 .063* 140 .088* 430 440 WBR d 1600 .019 .025 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .050* NBR .075* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION pzq .300 J/9 56. San Miguel & San Joaquin H. True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 0 .000 NBT 2 3200 250 .116* 550 .288* NBR 0 0 120 370 SBL 1 1600 70 .044* 150 .094* SBT 2 3200 480 .150 360 .113 SBR 1 1600 400 .250 150 .094 EBL 2 3200 300 .094* 520 .163* EBT 3 4800 570 .121 820 .173 EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 2 3200 450 .141 260 .'081 WBT 3 4800 1150 .258* 570 .131* WBR 0 0 90 60 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .002* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 57. Goldenrod & Coast Hw. .514 .676 True Minimum With Improvements HOUR HV/C LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 1 1600 130 .081* 60 .038* NBT 1 1600 10 .025 10 .025 NBR 0 0 30 30 10 SBT 11 1600 10 088* .038* SBR 0 0 60 20 EBL 1 1600 20 .013* 30 .019 EBT 2 3200 1210 .378 2080 .650* EBR d 1600 30 .019 70 .044 WBL 1 1600 40 .025 30 .019* WBT 3 4800 2800 .585* 1820 .381 WBR 0 0 10 10 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Pao .767 745 58. Marguerite & San Joaquin H. True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 1.5 0.5 3200 290 50 .106* 170 60 .072* NBR 1 1600 30 .019 60 .038 SBL 1 1600 60 .038 80 .050 16000 .044* 400 .056* SSBT BR 0 30 EBL 1 1600 20 .013* 40 .025 EBT 2 3200 420 .131 940 .294* EBR 1 1600 110 .069 320 .200 WBL 1 1600 30 .019 110 .069* WBT 3 4800 1060 .221* 640 .133 WBR d 1600 90 .056 50 .031 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 59. Marguerite & Coast Hw. .384 .491 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 140 .088* 160 .100* NBT 1 1600 100 .113 120 .131 NBR 0 0 80 90 SBL 1 1600 60 .038 130 .081 SBT 1 1600 60 .100* 110 .113* SBR 0 0 100 70 EBL 1 1600 80 .050* 100 .063 EBT 2 3200 1350 .422 1970 .616* EBR 1 1600 60 .038 120 .075 WBL 1 1600 50 .031 110 .069* WBT 2 3200 2040 .644* 1600 .513 WBR 0 0 20 40 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 11 P31 882 . uyu 11 60. Spyglass H. & San Joaquin H. True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 NBT 1 1600 0 .013* 10 .025* NBR 0 0 20 30 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 40 .025* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR d 1600 260 .163 140 .088 EBL 1 1600 80 .050* 230 .144* EBT 2 3200 620 .194 980 .306 EBR 1 1600 20 .013 60 .038 WBL. 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 2 3200 1080 .338* 610 .191* WBR d 1600 70 .044 70 .044 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .150* SBR .069* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 61. Poppy & Coast'Hw. .589 .454 True Minimum With Improvements HOUC HOC LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLK NBL 1 1600 20 .013* 20 .013 NBT 1 1600 10 .019 10 .038* NBR 0 0 20 50 SBL 0 0 50 120 {.075}* SBT 1 1600 10 .044* 10 .088 SBR 0 0 10 10 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 20 .013 EBT 2 3200 1380 .434 1970 .619* EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013* WBT 2 3200 1940 .613* 1700 .538 WBR 0 0 20 20 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION P3z .676 .745 62. Newport Coast & SR-73 NB True Minimum With Improvements -AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 2 3200 1300 .406* 800 .250 NBR f 500 240 SBT 2 3200 430 .134 940 .294* SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 1.5 290 260 WBT 0 3200 0 .131* 0 .100* WBR 0.5 130 60 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 64. Newport Coast & San Joaquin 537 .394 True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 .044 140 .044* NB 4800 1510 .315* 700 .146 0 SBT 3 4800 740 .154 1110 .231* SBR 1 . 1600 130 .081 370 .231 EBL 1 1600 500 .313* 290 .181* EBR 2 3200 90 .028 130 .041 0 0 0 0 WWBL BT WBR 0 0 0 0 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION P33 628 .456 65. Newport Coast & Coast Hw. True Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBL 2 3200 290 .091* 780 .244* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR f 200 230 EBL 1 1600 270 .169* 140 .088* EBT 3 4800 970 .202 1660 .346 EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 4800 14660 .304* 1270 .265* WBR f Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION p3q 570 .603 APPENDIX Q SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE 11 I1 Study Area Land Use By NBTM Taz Analysis Year. 2040 Runld: SAmin1 Land Use: SAminl Network: boOS01 Reference Number., 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build rime: 3:30:00 PM Modeler: Marile Whiteman 18TMTAZ Land Use Code M UesoMpUon 4eanay 1373 10 TSF General Commercial 36.460 1373 23 TSF General Office 85.073 1373 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1373 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1373 26 TSF industrial 0.000 1374 10 TSF General Commercial 42.231 1374 23 TSF General Office 84.463 1374 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1374 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1374 26 TSF Industrial 0.000 1375 10 TSF General Commercial 61.518 1375 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1375 23 TSF General Office 123.035 1375 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1375 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1375 26 TSF Industrial 0.000 1376 10 TSF General Commercial 67.464 1376 23 TSF General Office 134.927 1376 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1376 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1376 26 TSF Industrial 0.000 1377 7 ROOM Hotel 213.000 1377 10 TSF General Commercial 74.583 1377 23 TSF General Office 213.096 1377 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1377 26 TSF Industrial 0.000 1378 7 ROOM Hotel 244.000 1378 10 TSF General Commercial 85.378 1378 23 TSF General Office 243.936 1378 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1378 26 TSF Industrial 0.000 1379 23 TSF General Office 370.446 1380 23 TSF General Office 168.054 1381 23 TSF General Office 235.001 1382 3 DU Apartment 406.000 1382 23 TSF General Office 368.518 1383 23 TSF General Office 210.330 Friday, April 15, 2005 /1?21 Page 1 of 15 Analysts Year. 2040 Runld: SAmin1 Land Use: SAmin1 Network: boOS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/1512005 Build Time: 3:30:00 PM Modeler. Mania Whiteman IETMTAZ L1 W Un CA Di tS 1118BA tlon Qum" 1384 10 TSF General Commercial 0.000 1364 23 TSF General Office 153.767 1385 3 DU Apartment 60.000 1385 7 ROOM Hotel 349.000 1386 23 TSF General Office 164.066 1387 23 TSF General Office 184.320 1388 10 TSF General Commercial 120.596 1388 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1389 10 TSF General Commercial 24.287 1389 23 TSF General Office 231.304 1390 23 TSF General Office 167.924 1391 23 TSF General Office 111.731 1392 10 TSF General Commercial 19.324 1392 23 TSF General Office 156.435 1393 10 TSF General Commercial 63.118 1393 23 TSF General Office 144.271 1395 7 ROOM Hotel 154.000 1395 10 TSF General Commercial 20.190 1395 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1396 23 TSF General Office 591.600 1397 23 TSF General Office 165.040 1398 3 DU Apartment 266.000 1398 10 TSF General Commercial 63.608 1399 3 DU Apartment 266.000 1400 3 DU Apartment 156.000 1401 24 TSF Medical Office 86.096 1402 23 TSF General Office 45.794 1403 7 ROOM Hotel 471.000 1403 10 TSF General Commercial 46.800 1403 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1403 23 TSF General Office 432.355 1403 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 10.900 1404 3 DU Apartment 242.000 1404 23 TSF General Office 434.953 1405 3 DU Apartment 4B2.000 1405 10 TSF General Commercial 128.610 1405 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1405 23 TSF General Office 695A57 1406 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1406 26 TSF Industrial 606.370 Fdday, Apol 15, 2005 V Page 2 of 16 I Analysts Year: Runld., Lend Use: Network: 2040 Reference Number: 01232 SAmin1 Build Date: 4/15/2005 SAmin1 Build Time: 3:30:00 PM boOS01 Modeler. Marlle Whiteman SIM TAZ Land Use Cede Untts Uesedpu0n Quant" 1407 10 TSF General Commercial 31.720 1407 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 1.560 1407 23 TSF General Office 124.990 1407 24 TSF Medical Office 3.770 1408 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 145.000 1409 7 ROOM Hotel 300.000 1409 10 TSF General Commercial 35.000 1409 13 TSF Restaurant 8.000 1409 23 TSF General Office 660.000 1409 38 ACRE Park 3.330 1410 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 88.000 1411 10 TSF General Commercial 1.380 1411 40 ACRE Golf Course 15.690 1412 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 60.000 1413 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 33.000 1413 18 TSF Health Club 60.330 1413 23 TSF General Office 67.950 1413 39 ACRE Regional Park 45.910 1415 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 153.000 1415 36 TSF Church 8.730 1416 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 198.000 1417 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 56.000 1418 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 59.000 1419 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 173.000 1420 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 465.000 1421 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 116.000 1421 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 60.000 1421 3 DU Apartment 352.000 1421 10 TSF General Commercial 174.800 1421 13 TSF Restaurant 4.370 1421 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 3.000 1421 23 TSF GeneralOfOce 214.660 1421 24 TSF Medical Office 43.220 1421 29 STU Elementary/Private School 636.000 1421 32 TSF Library 5.240 1422 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 490.000 1423 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 266.000 1423 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 18.230 1423 38 ACRE Park 4.000 1424 3 DU Apartment 1,445.000 Friday, April 15, 2005 Q!57 Page 3 of 15 Analysis Year. 2040 Runld: SAmin1 Land Use: SAmin1 Network: boOS01 Reference Number. 01232 Build Data: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 3:30:00 PM Modeler. Media Whiteman ETM TAZ lfnd Un Cade WN imm"Pum Q111ft 1425 10 TSF General Commercial 1,730 1425 23 TSF General Office 128.810 1425 36 TSF Church 24.100 1426 1 DU Res-LoW (SFD) 119.00D 1426 36 TSF Church 40.000 1427 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 550.000 1427 3 OU Apartment 389.000 1427 10 TSF General Commercial 97.226 1427 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1427 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 0.000 1427 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1427 24 TSF Medical Office 0,000 1427 30 STU Junior/High School 2,184.000 1427 35 BEDS Nursing/Cony. Home 68.000 1427 36 TSF Church 59.680 1427 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 13.370 1427 38 ACRE Park 0.400 1428 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 257.000 1428 3 DU Apartment 152.000 1428 7 ROOM Hotel 140,000 1428 10 TSF General Commerdal 332.520 1428 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1428 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1428 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 0.000 1428 19 CRT Tennis Club 0.000 1428 20 SLIP Marine 130.000 1428 23 TSF General Office 75.090 1428 24 TSF Medical Office 0,000 1428 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 22.310 1429 1 DU Res-LoW (SFD) 656.000 1429 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 13.000 1429 3 DU Apartment 59.000 1429 21 SEAT Theater 90.000 1429 29 STU Elamentaty/Private School 436.000 1429 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 0.900 1429 38 ACRE Park 3.030 1430 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 30.000 1430 3 DU Apartment 154.000 1430 7 ROOM Hotel 64.000 1430 10 TSF General Commercial 333.972 Friday, April 15, 2005 06 Page 4 of 15 Analysis Year: 2040 Runld: SAmin1 Land Use: SAminl Network: boOS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build rime: 3:30:00 PM Modeler. Marne Whiteman MUMTAl Land Use Code Udts Description 4uan ny 1430 13 TSF Restaurant 0:000 1430 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1430 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 0.000 1430 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1430 23 TSF General Of ce 220.911 1430 33 TSF Post Office 0.000 1431 3 DU Apartment 122.000 1431 10 TSF General Commercial 152.392 1431 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1431 17 TSF Yacht Club 0.000 1431 23 TSF General Office 67.556 1432 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 200.000 1432 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 459.000 1432 3 DU Apartment 250.000 1432 6 ROOM Motel 0.000 1432 7 ROOM Hotel 53.000 1432 10 TSF General Commercial 120.879 1432 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1432 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1432 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1433 1 DU Res -LOW (SFD) 98.000 1433 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1433 3 DU Apartment 405.000 1433 23 TSF General Office 67.160 1433 24 TSF Medical Office 24.460 1433 26 TSF Industrial 213.063 1433 35 BEDS Nursing/Cony. Home 270.000 1434 23 TSF General Office 9.660 1434 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 7.770 1434 34 BED Hospital 822.000 1435 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 68.000 1435 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 28.000 1435 10 TSF General Commercial 10.800 1435 13 TSF Restaurant 8.400 1435 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 2.700 1436 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1436 3 DU Apartment 1,370.000 1436 4 DU Elderly Residential 0.000 1436 10 TSF General Commercial 3.500 1436 24 TSF Medical Office 39.600 U Friday, April 15, 2005 �� Page 5 of 15 Analysis Year. 2040 Runld: SAmin1 Land Use: SAm1n1 Network: boOS01 Reference Number. 01232 Bulld Date: 4/1512005 Build Time; 3:30:00 PM ' Modeler: Marlle Whiteman STMTAZ lsndUN Cade Witt WfecripUan Quint" 1436 26 TSF Industrial 48.002 1436 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 169.000 1436 38 ACRE Park 0.000 1437 26 TSF Industrial 5.000 1438 23 TSF General Office 57.400 1438 26 TSF Industrial 8.330 1438 27 TSF Mini-SloragelWarehouse 0.000 1438 29 STU Elementary/Private School 622.000 1439 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1439 3 DU Apartment 723.000 1439 5 DU Mobile Home 0.000 1439 10 TSF General Commercial 50.910 1439 23 TSF General Office 367.810 1439 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1439 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1439 26 TSF Industrial 230.062 1439 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 0.00D 1440 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 281.000 1441 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 462,000 1441 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1441 3 DU Apartment 273.000 1441 6 ROOM Motel 145.000 1441 10 TSF General Commercial 18.105 1441 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1441 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1442 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 43.000 1442 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 214.000 1442 38 ACRE Park 6.790 1443 1 DU Res -Law (SFD) 125.000 1443 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 350.000 1443 3 DU Apartment 54.000 1443 38 ACRE Park 6.500 1444 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 94.000 1444 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 498.600 1445 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 139.000 1445 2 DU Reg-Medlum (SFA) 609.000 1446 1 DU Res-LoW (SFD) 124.000 1446 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 239.000 1446 38 ACRE Park 2.690 1447 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 88.000 Friday, Apol 15, 2005 ^� Page 6 of 15 Analysis Year., 2040 Runld: SAmin1 Land Use: SAmin1 Network: boOS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 3:30:00 PM Modeler. Media Whiteman NTMTAZ Land UsB Code Will UesCriptbn quantity 1447 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 415.000 1448 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 87.000 1448 2 DU Res -Medium (SPA) 103.000 1448 10 TSF General Commercial 26.170 1448 13 TSF Restaurant 2.240 1448 23 TSF General Office 12.190 1448 24 TSF Medical Office 0.990 1449 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 95.000 1449 3 DU Apartment 192.000 1449 10 TSF General Commercial 86.445 1449 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1449 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1450 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 159.000 1450 3 DU Apartment 134.000 1450 6 ROOM Motel 16.000 1450 7 ROOM Hotel 74.000 1450 10 TSF General Commercial 81.790 1450 23 TSF General Office 103.185 1451 1 DU Ras-Low(SFD) 22.000 1451 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 110.000 1451 3 DU Apartment 5.000 1451 6 ROOM Motel 3.000 1451 7 ROOM Hotel 183.000 1451 10 TSF General Commercial 93218 1451 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1451 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1451 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 6.000 1452 3 DU Apartment 312.000 1452 10 TSF General Commercial 168.479 1452 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1452 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1452 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1452 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 0.000 1453 3 DU Apartment 120.000 1453 10 TSF General Commercial 125.714 1453 21 SEAT Theater 685.000 1453 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1453 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1453 36 TSF Church 0.000 1454 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 0.000 April 15, 2005 69 Page 7 of 15 Analysis Year. 2040 Runld., SAmin1 Land Use., SAmin1 Network: boOS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/1512005 Build 77me: 3:30:00 PM Modeler. Marlia Whiteman SIMTAZ UW IN Code Un is OeeC111 0t1 4entltil 1454 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 152,000 1454 10 TSF General Commercial 53.270 1454 11 ACRE Comm./Recreation 0.850 1454 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1454 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1464 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1454 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 4.650 1455 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 3,000 1455 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 403.000 1455 10 TSF General Commercial 108.220 1455 13 TSF Restaurant 9.200 1455 23 TSF General Office 1.000 1455 26 TSF Industrial 38.000 1456 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 797.000 1456 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 98.000 1456 3 DU Apartment 26.000 1457 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 218.000 1457 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 476.000 1457 3 DU Apartment 103.000 1457 5 DU Mobile Home 58.000 1457 6 ROOM Motel 26.000 1457 10 TSF General Commercial 12.540 1457 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 1.250 1457 20 SLIP Marine 58.000 1457 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 13.440 1457 29 STU ElementaryiPdvate School 389.000 1457 36 TSF Church 10.050 1457 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 17.400 1457 38 ACRE Park 1.200 1458 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 366.000 1458 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 684.000 1458 3 DU Apartment 173.000 1458 10 TSF General Commercial 20.810 1458 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1458 20 SLIP Marine 14.000 1458 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1458 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1458 32 TSF Library 4.800 1458 36 TSF Church 2.000 1459 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 9.000 Friday, April 15, 2005 n'O Page 8 of 15 1 Analysis Year: Runld.• Land Use: Network., 2040 SAmin1 SAminl boOS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 3:30:00 PM Modeler. Merle Whiteman NIM TAZ Lend Use Code UoHs Descrip" Quantity 1459 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 131.000 1459 3 DU Apartment 69.000 1459 7 ROOM Hotel 34.000 1459 10 TSF General Commercial 196.530 1459 11 ACRE Comm./Recreation 4.250 1459 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1459 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1459 17 TSF Yacht Club 0.000 1459 21 SEAT Theater 350,000 1459 23 TSF General Office 60.000 1459 33 TSF Post Office 1.700 1459 37 TSF Youth CV/Service 4.970 1460 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 677.000 1460 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 194.000 1460 3 DU Apartment 51.000 1460 19 CRT Tennis Club 2.000 1460 38 ACRE Park 0.830 1461 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) - 214.000 1401 2 DU Res-Medium.(SFA) 263.000 1461 10 TSF General Commercial 4.990 1461 13 TSF Restaurant 20.000 1461 17 TSF Yacht Club 8.290 1461 20 SLIP Marina 352.000 1461 23 TSF General Office 12.000 1461 26 TSF Industrial 5.040 1461 38 ACRE Park 0.780 1462 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 32.000 1463 3 DU Apartment 520.000 1463 10 TSF General Commercial 112.450 1463 13 TSF Restaurant 21.550 1463 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 17.420 1464 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 43.000 1464 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 3,119.000 1464 6 ROOM Motel 4.000 1464 10 TSF General Commercial 73.070 1464 13 TSF Restaurant 16.550 1464 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 5.430 1464 23 TSF General Office 18.370 1464 24 TSF Medical Office 2.750 1464 33 TSF Post Office 1.900 Fdday, April 15, 2005 ^ `t Page 9 of 15 Analysis Year. 2040 Runld: SAmin1 Land Use: SAmin1 Network: boOS01 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 3:30:00 PM Modeler. Media Whiteman MTM TAZ land UN Code Ulna 1880 ptlon RuanUtY 1464 36 TSF Church 3.000 1464 38 ACRE Park 1.620 1465 5 DU Mobile Home 397.000 1465 10 TSF General Commercial 60.630 1465 13 TSF Restaurant 18.190 1465 20 SLIP Marine 218.000 1465 23 TSF General Office 30.310 1466 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 212.000 1466 7 ROOM Hotel 754.000 1466 13 TSF Restaurant 83.930 1466 19 CRT Tennis Club 16.000 1466 22 ACRE Newport Dunes SCOW 1466 23 TSF General Office 6,000 1466 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 2.690 1466 40 ACRE Golf Course 2.000 1467 3 DU Apartment 1,185.000 1468 29 'STU Elementary/Pdvate School 320.000 1469 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 792.000 1469 3 DU Apartment 225.000 1469 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 6.450 1469 29 STU Elementary/Private School 294.000 1469 30 STU Junlor/Hlgh School 1,801.000 1469 36 TSF Church 34.960 1469 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 34.970 1469 38 ACRE Park 8.000 1470 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 145.000 1470 10 TSF General Commercial 78.230 1470 19 CRT Tennis Club 119.000 1470 23 TSF General Office 11.660 1471 1 DU Res -Low (SF0) 460.000 1471 38 ACRE Park 2.000 1472 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 209.750 1473 3 DU Apartment 300.000 1474 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 1,686.000 1474 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 208.000 1474 3 DU Apartment 736.000 1474 10 TSF General Commercial 35.000 1474 13 TSF Restaurant 6.350 1474 38 ACRE Park 14.230 1475 25 TSF R & D 81.730 Fdday, Apdi 15, 2005 Q17. Page 10 of 15 Analysis Year., Runld: Land Use: Network: 2040 SAmin1 SAmin1 boOS01 Reference Number., 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 3:30:00 PM Modeler. Marlie Whiteman IMTMTAZ Land Use Code Units UesciripUon Quantity 1475 27 TSF Mini-Storage/Warehouse 196.420 1475 29 STU Elementary/Private School 52.000 1475 33 TSF Post Office 55.200 1475 36 TSF Church 100.280 1476 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 227.000 1477 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 500.000 1478 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 50.000 1479 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 101.000 1479 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 54.000 1480 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 144.000 1480 3 DU Apartment 80,000 1481 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 101.000 1481 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 182.000 1481 10 TSF General Commercial 2.300 1482 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 142.000 1482 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 43.000 1482 3 DU Apartment 73.000 1482 40 ACRE Golf Course 181.200 1483 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 21:000 1484 3 DU Apartment 120.000 1484 7 ROOM Hotel 425.000 1484 10 TSF General Commercial 21.700 1484 23 TSF General Office 950.000 1485 9 TSF Regional Commercial 1,464.000 1485 10 TSF General Commercial 0.000 1465 21 SEAT Theater 1,700.000 1466 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1486 3 DU Apartment 245.000 1486 10 TSF General Commercial 125.680 1466 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1486 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 0.000 1486 23 TSF General Office 1,253.812 1486 31 TSF Cultural/Leaming Center 40.000 1487 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 69.000 1487 7 ROOM Hotel 611.000 1487 10 TSF General Commerclal 7.500 1487 19 CRT Tennis Club 22.000 1487 23 TSF General Office 11.630 1487 40 ACRE Golf Course 99.400 1488 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 122.000 Friday, April 15, 2005 Glv > Page 11 of 15 Analysis Year. 2040 Runld., SAmin1 Lend Use: SAm1n1 Network: boOS01 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 3:30:00 PM Modeler. Marlia Whiteman MlTM TAZ land ft Code Witt ka mpm 4uangty 1489 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 228.000 1489 10 TSF General Commercial 5.000 1490 23 TSF General Office 170.800 1491 10 TSF General Commercial 10.000 1491 23 TSF General Office 923.640 1491 24 TSF Medical Office 351.950 1492 10 TSF General Commercial 38.100 1492 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1492 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1492 21 SEAT Theater 2,150.000 1492 23 TSF General Office 443.260 1493 23 TSF General Of re 414.510 1494 10 TSF General Commercial 105.000 1494 32 TSF Library 65.000 1495 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 416.000 1495 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 37.000 1495 10 TSF General Commercial 2.380 1495 17 TSF Yacht Club 62.020 1495 20 SLIP Marine 283.000 1495 23 TSF General Office 186.530 1495 38 ACRE Park 6.530 1496 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 73.000 1496 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 256.000 1496 3 DU Apartment 152.000 1496 29 STU Elementary/Private School 12.030 1497 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 143.000 1497 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 214.000 1497 3 DU Apartment 48.000 1498 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 234.000 1498 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1498 3 DU Apartment 83.000 1498 10 TSF General Commercial 52.132 1498 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1498 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1498 38 ACRE Park 3.600 1499 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 144.000 1500 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 178.000 1500 38 ACRE Park 1.030 1501 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 849.000 1501 3 DU Apartment 74.000 Friday, April 15, 2005 O lq Page 112 of 15 Analysis Year: ' Runid: Land Use: Network: 2040 Reference Number. 01232 SAmin1 Build Date: 4/15/2005 SAmin1 Build Time: 3:30:00 PM boOS01 Modeler. Madie Whiteman STM TAZ land Use Code We Descripm Qoant" 1501 10 TSF General Commercial 104.840 1501 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1501 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1501 21 SEAT Theater 500.000 1501 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1501 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1501 38 ACRE Park 0.000 1502 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 186.000 1502 3 DU Apartment 70.000 1502 10 TSF General Commercial 98.323 1502 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1502 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1502 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1502 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1503 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 52.000 1503 3 DU Apartment 28.000 1503 10 TSF General Commercial 39.674 1503 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1503 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1503 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1503 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1503 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1504 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 542.000 1504 3 DU Apartment 39.000 1504 10 TSF General Commercial 55.391 1504 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1504 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1504 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1504 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1504 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1504 36 TSF Church 12.340 1505 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 843.000 1505 3 DU Apartment 31.000 1505 10 TSF General Commercial 46.766 1505 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1505 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1505 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1505 32 TSF Library 3.800 1505 33 TSF Post Office 5.000 1506 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 363.000 Friday, April 15, 2005 a1 S Page 13 of 15 Analysts Year. 2040 Runld: SAmin1 Land Use: SAmin1 Network: boOS01 Reference Number 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 3:30;00 PM Modeler, Media Whiteman WTM TAZ Wits Un C* INN 088C19 ift QuNt" 1506 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1506 3 DU Apartment 6,000 1506 10 TSF General Commercial 19.515 1506 23 TSF General Office 4.879 1507 1 DU Res -Lbw (SFD) 142.000 1507 38 ACRE Park 0.780 1508 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 228.000 1508 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 120.000 1508 3 DU Apartment 120.000 1508 29 STU Elementary/Private School 790.000 1508 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 5.850 1510 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 200.000 1511 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 20,000 1511 10 TSF General Commercial 70.790 1512 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 246.000 1513 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 348.000 1513 4 DU Elderly Residential 10D.000 1513 18 TSF Health Club 1.000 1513 37 TSF Youth Clr/Sevice 24.070 1514 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 41.00D 1515 3 DU Apartment 388.000 1515 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 8.400 1516 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 67.000 1516 4 DU Elderly Residential 100.000 1516 36 TSF Church 88.670 1517 3 DU Apartment 160,000 1517 10 TSF General Commercial 71.080 1517 23 TSF General Office 9.750 1517 26 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 13.390 1517 29 STU Elementary/Pdvate School 406.000 1517 30 STU Junior/High School 780,OOD 1517 36 TSF Church 31.380 1518 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 441.000 1518 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 67.000 1518 38 ACRE Park 0.950 Isis 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 475.000 1519 38 ACRE Park 14.230 1520, 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 207.000 1521 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 580.000 1521 29 STU Elementary/Private School 498.000 Friday, April 15, 2005 �'� Page 14 of 15 1 1 1 Analysis Year., Runld: Land Use: Network: 2040 SAmin1 SAmin1 boOS01 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 3:30:00 PM Modeler. Marlie Whiteman WIM TAZ land Ike Code Udts Description Quantity 1 1521 1522 38 1 ACRE DU Park Res -Low (SFD) 9.730 119.000 1522 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 120.000 1522 10 TSF General Commercial 96.540 1522 23 TSF General Office 12.900 1525 3 DU Apartment 1,100.000 1 1526 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 290.000 1527 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 125.000 1521 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 7.320 1 1528 36 TSF Church 26.010 1556 3 DU Apartment 0.000 1558 3 DU Apartment 7.000 1 1558 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1558 26 TSF Industrial 0.000 1 1559 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 0.000 1559 3 DU Apartment 7.000 1559 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1 1559 26 TSF Industrial 0.000 1559 38 ACRE Park 20.000 1618 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 6.000 1 1713 34 BED Hospital 443.000 1714 3 DU Apartment 673.000 1715 10 TSF General Commercial 17.760 1715 24 TSF Medical Office 142.430 1716 24 TSF Medical Office 142.430 1 1716 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 95.000 1 1 1 1 Friday, April 15, 2005 Q1-7 Page 15 of 15 APPENDIX R ' SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE CHANGE ' FROM CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BY TAZ 17 1 i CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MINIMUM LU_Code lQuantity OccupancyRate LU_Code Quantity Occupant Rate 1516 2 67 0.95 2 67 0.95 1516 4 100 1 4 100 1 1516 36 88.67 1 36 88.67 1 1517 3 160 0.95 3 160 0.95 1617 10 71.08 0.9 10 71.08 0.9 1517 23 9.75 0.9 23 9.75 0.9 1517 28 13.39 1 28 13.39 1 1517 291 406 1 29 406 1 1517 30 780 1 30 780 1 1517 36 31.38 1 36 31.38 1 1518 1 441 0.95 1 441 0.95 1518 2 67 0.95 2 67 0.95 1518 38 0.95 1 38 0.95 1 1519 1 475 0.95 1 475 0.95 1519 38 14.23 1 38 14.23 1 1520 11 207 0.95 1 207 0.95 1521 11 580 0.95 1 580 0.95 1521 291 498 1 291 498 1 1521 381 9.73 1 38 9.73 1 1522 1 119 0.95 1 119 0.95 1522 21 120 0.95 21 120 0.95 1522 101 96.54 0.9 101 96.54 0.9 1522 231 12.9 0.9 231 12.9 0.9 1408 11 145 0.95 1 145 0.95 1409 71 300 0.9 7 300 0.9 1409 10 351 0.9 10 35 0.9 1409 13 81 0.9 13 8 0.9 1409 23 660 0.9 23 660 0.9 1409 38 3.33 1 3B 3.33 1 1410 2 88 0.95 2 88 0.95 1411 10 1.38 0.9 101 1.38 0.9 1411 40 15.69 1 401 15.69 1 1412 11 60 0.95 11 60 0.95 1413 21 33 0:95 21 33 0.95 1413 181 60.33 1 181 60.33 1 1413 231 67.95 0.9 23 67.95 0.9 1413 391 45.91 1 39 45.91 1 1415 11 153 0.95 1 153 0.95 1415 361 8.73 1 36 8.73 1 1416 11 198 0.95 1 198 0.95 1417 11 56 0.95 1 56 0.95 1418 11 59 0.95 1 59 0.95 1419 11 173 0.95 1 173 0.95 1420 11 465 0.95 1 465 0.95 1421 11 116 0.95 1 116 0.95 1421 21 60 0.95 2 60 0.95 1421 31 352 0.95 3 352 0.95 1421 101 174.8 0.9 10 174.8 0.9 1421 13 4.37 0.9 13 4.37 0.9 1421 15 3 0.9 151 3 0.9 1421 23 214.66 0.9 231 214.66 0.9 1421 24 43.22 0.9 24 43.22 0.9 1421 29 636 1 291 636 1 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MINIMUM LU Code Quanti Occu ant Rate LU Code Quantltv Occupant Rate 1421 32 5.24 1 32 5.24 1 1422 1 490 0.95 1 490 0.95 1423 1 266 0.95 1 266 0.95 1423 37 18.23 1 37 18.23 1 1423 38 4 1 38 4 1 1424 3 1445 0.95 3 1445 0.95 1373 101 35.08 0.9 10 36.46 0.9 1373 231 78.13 0.9 23 85.073 0.9 1373 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1373 251 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1373 261 12.19 0.9 26 0 0.9 1374 101 35.08 0.9 10 42.231 0.9 1374 231 78.13 0.9 23 84.463 0.9 1374 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1374 251 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1374 261 12.19 0.9 26 0 0.9 1375 101 54.46 0.9 10 61.518 0.9 1375 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1375 231 117.2 0.9 23 123,035 0.9 1375 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1375 251 0 0.9 251 0 0.9 1375 261 18.29 0.9 26 0 0.9 1376 101 56.13 0.9 10 67.464 0.9 1376 231 125.01 0.9 23 134.927 0.9 1376 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1376 251 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1376 261 19.51 0.9 26 0 0.9 1377 101 80.68 0.9 10 74.583 0.9 1377 231 179.7 0.9 231 213.096 0.9 1377 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1377 251 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1377 261 28.05 0.9 26 0 0.9 1378 101 91.21 0.9 10 85.378 0.9 1378 231 203.14 0.9 23 243.936 0.9 1378 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1378 251 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1378 261 31.7 0.9 261 0 0.9 1425 101 1.73 0.9 10 1.73 0.9 1425 231 128.81 0.9 23 128.81 0.9 1425 361 24A 1 36 24.1 1 1426 11 119 0.95 1 119 0.95 1426 36 40 1 36 40 1 1427 1 550 0.95 1 0 0.95 1427 2 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1427 10 21.39 0.9 101 152.392 0.9 1427 15 0 0.9 151 0 0.9 1427 16 0 1 16 0 1 1427 23 29.63 0.9 23 67.556 0.9 1427 24 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1427 30 2184 1 30 0 1 1427 35 68 1 35 0 1 1427 36 59.68 1 36 0 1 1427 37 13.37 1 37 0 1 Rq I CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MINIMUM LU_Code Quantity OccupancyRate LU_Code Quantity OccupancyRate 1427 38 0.4 1 38 0 1 1428 1 257 0.95 1 550 0.95 1428 3 152 0.95 3 0 0.95 1428 7 140 0.9 7 0 0.9 1428 10 332.52 0.9 10 0 0.9 1428 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1428 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1428 161 0 1 16 0 1 1428 191 0 1 19 0 1 1428 201 0 1 20 0 1 1428 231 75.09 0.9 23 0 0.9 1428 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1428 371 22.31 1 37 13.37 1 1525 31 1100 0.95 31 1100 0.95 1526 11 290 0.95 'll 290 0.95 1618 11 6 0.95 11 6 0.95 1527 2 125 0.95 21 125 0.95 1429 1 656 0.95 11 656 0.95 1429 2 13 0.95 21 13 0.95 1429 3 59 0.95 31 59 0.95 1429 21 90 1 211 90 1 1429 29 436 1 291 436 1 1429 37 0.9 1 37 0.9 1 1429 381 3.03 1 38 3.03 1 1528 281 7.32 1 28 7.32 1 1528 361 26.01 1 36 26.01 1 1430 11 30 0.95 1 30 0.95 1430 61 0 0.9 6 0 0.9 1430 71 64 0.9 7 64 0.9 1430 101 275.98 0.9 10 274.009 0.9 1430 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1430 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1430 161 0 1 16 0 1 1430 181 0 1 18 0 1 1430 231 283.82 0.9 23 220.911 0.9 1430 331 9.9 1 331 0 1 1431 31 36 0.95 31 154 0.95 1431 101 149.91 0.9 101 59.963 0.9 1431 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1431 171 0 1 17 0 1 1431 231 77.65 0.9 23 0 0.9 1432 11 205 0.95 1 200 0.95 1432 21 379 0.95 2 459 0.95 1432 31 8 0.95 3 250 0.95 1432 61 0 0.9 61 0 0.9 1432 71 53 0.9 71 120.879 0.9 1432 101 66.38 0.9 101 120.879 0.9 1432 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1432 23 135.73 0.9 23 0 0.9 1432 24 11.29 0.9 24 0 0.9 1433 1 98 0.95 1 98 0.95 1433 2 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1433 3 142 0.95 3 405 0.95 T CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MINIMUM LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate LU Code lQuantity Occu anc Rate 1433 23 67.16 0.9 23 67.16 0.9 1433 24 24.46 0.9 24 24A6 0.9 1433 26 298.12 0.9 26 213.063 0.9 1433 35 270 1 35 270 1 1715 24 142.43 0.9 24 142.43 0.9 1714 3 673 0.95 3 673 0.95 1715 101 17.76 0.9 10 17.76 0.9 1434 231 9.66 0.9 231 9.66 0.9 1716 241 142.43 0.9 24 142.43 0.9 1434 281 7J7 1 28 7.77 1 1434 341 822 1 34 822 1 1716 351 95 1 35 95 1 1435 1 68 0.95 1 68 0.95 1435 2 28 0.95 2 28 0.95 1435 10 10.8 0.9 10 10.8 0.9 1435 13 8.4 0.9 131 8.4 0.9 1435 15 2.7 0.9 15 2.7 0.9 1379 23 349.64 0.9 23 370.446 0.9 1380 23 158.61 0.9 23 168.054 0.9 1381 231 221.8 0.9 23 235.001 0.9 1382 231 321.53 0.9 23 36B.518 0.9 1383 231 210.33 0.9 23 210.33 0.9 1384 101 25.251 0.9 10 0 0.9 1384 231 67.02 0.9 231 153.767 0.9 1385 71 349 0.9 7 349 0.9 1386 231 228.21 0.9 23 164.066 0.9 1387 231 184.32 0.9 23 184.32 0.9 1388 101 106.11 0.9 10 120.596 0.9 1388 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1389 101 46.3 1 10 24.287 1 1389 231 201.78 0.9 23 231.304 0.9 1390 231 146.48 0.9 231 167.924 0.9 1391 231 97.42 0.9 231 111.731 0.9 1392 101 17.78 1 10 19.324 1 1392 231 160.59 0.9 23 156,435 0.9 1393 101 58.12 0.9 10 63.118 0.9 1436 21 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1436 31 1370 0.95 3 1370 0.95 1436 41 0 1 4 0 1 1436 101 3.5 0.9 10 3.5 0.9 1436 241 39.6 0.9 24 39.6 0.9 1436 261 48.002 0.9 26 48.002 0.9 1436 351 169 1 35 169 1 1436 381 0.17 1 38 0 1 1437 261 5 0.9 26 5 0.9 1438 231 57.4 0.9 23 57.4 0.9 1438 261 8.33 0.9 26 8.33 0.9 1438 271 0 0.9 271 0 0.9 1438 29 622 1 291 622 1 1439 2 0 6. 55 2 0 0.95 1439 3 464 0.95 3 723 0.95 1439 5 0 0.95 61 0 0.95 1439 10 50.91 0.9 101 50.91 0.9 1-1 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MINIMUM LU Code Quantity OccupancyRate LU_Code Quantity OccupancyRate 1439 23 239.51 0.9 23 367.81 0.9 1439 24 61.63 0.9 24 0 0.9 1439 25 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1439 26 837.27 0.9 26 230.062 0.9 1439 35 59 1 35 0 1 1440 2 281 0.95 2 281 0.95 1441 11 462 0.95 11 462 0.95 1441 21 0 0.95 21 0 0.96 1441 31 293 0.95 31 273 0.95 1441 61 90 0.9 61 145 0.9 1441 101 50.03 0.9 101 18.105 0.9 1441 131 0 0.9 131 0 0.9 1441 151 0 0.9 151 0 0.9 1442 1 43 0.95 1 43 0.95 1442 2 214 0.95 2 214 0.95 1442 38 6.79 1 38 6.79 1' 1443 1 125 0.95 1 125 0.95 1443 2 350 0.95 2 350 0.95 1443 3 54 0.95 3 54 0.95 1443 38 6.5 1 38 6.5 1 1444 11 94 0.95 11 94 0.95 1444 21 498.5 0.95 21 498.5 0.95 1445 1 139 0.9 11 139 0.9 1445 2 509 0.9 2 509 0.9 1446 1 124 0.95 1 124 0.95 1446 2 239 0.95 2 239 0.95 1446 38 2.69 1 38 2.69 1 1447 1 88 0.9 1 88 0.9 1447 2 415 0.9 2 415 0.9 1448 11 87 0.9 1 87 0.9 1448 21 103 0.9 21 103 0.9 1448 101 26.17 0.9 101 26.17 0.9 1448 131 2.24 0.9 131 2.24 0.9 1448 231 12.19 0.9 231 12.19 0.9 1448 241 0.99 0.9 241 0.99 0.9 1449 21 95 0.9 21 95 0.9 1449 101 74.9 0.9 101 86.445 0.9 1449 131 0 0.9 131 0 0.9 1449 15 0 0.9 151 0 0.9 1449 23 20.02 0.9 231 0 0.9 1450 2 159 0.9 21 159 0.9 1450 3 3 0.9 31 134 0.9 1450 6 16 0.9 61 16 0.9 1450 10 67.59 0.9 101 81.79 0.9 1450 131 0 0.9 131 0 0.9 1460 231 35.75 0.9 231 103.185 0.9 1451 11 22 0.9 11 22 0.9 1451 21 110 0.9 2 110 0.9 1451 3 5 0.9 3 5 0.9 1451 6 3 0.9 6 3 0.9 1451 7 22 0.9 7 183 0.9 1451 10 82.75 0.9 10 93.218 0.9 1451 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 TOM CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MINIMUM LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate 1451 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1451 23 8 0.9 23 0 0.9 1452 2 12 0.9 2 0 0.9 1452 10 130.51 0.9 10 168.479 0.9 1452 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1452 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1452 231 90.22 0.9 23 0 0.9 1452 371 6 1 37 0 1 1453 101 111.58 0.9 10 125.714 0.9 1453 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1453 211 685 1 21 685 1 1453 231 119.9 0.9 23 0 0.9 1453 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1453 361 26.01 1 361 0 1 1454 11 41 0.9 1 0 0.9 1454 21 172 0.9 2 152 0.9 1454 101 201.78 0.9 10 53.27 0.9 1454 111 0.85 1 11 0.85 1 1454 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1454 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1454 23 101.51 0.9 23 01 019 1454 37 4.651 1 37 4.65 1 1455 1 31 0.9 1 3 0.9 1455 2 403 0.9 2 403 0.9 1455 10 108.22 0.9 10 108.22 0.9 1455 13 9.2 0.9 13 9.2 0.9 1455 231 1 0.9 23 1 0.9 1455 261 38 0.9 26 38 0.9 1456 11 1040 0.9 1 797 0.9 1456 21 102 0.9 2 98 0.9 1456 31 26 0.9 3 26 0.9 1457 11 218 0.9 1 218 0.9 1457 21 476 0.9 2 476 0.9 1457 31 103 0.9 3 103 0.9 1457 51 58 0:9 51 58 0.9 1457 61 26 0.9 6 26 0.9 1457 101 12.54 0.9 10 12.54 0.9 1457 151 1.25 0.9 15 1.25 0.9 1457 201 58 1 20 58 1 1457 281 13.44 1 28 13.44 1 1457 291 389 1 29 389 1 1457 361 10.05 1 36 10.05 1 1457 371 17.4 1 37 17.4 1 1457 381 1.2 1 38 1.2 1 1458 1 366 0.9 1 366 0.9 1458 2 684 0.9 2 684 0.9 1458 3 173 0.9 3 173 0.9 1458 10 20.81 0.9 10 20.81 0.9 1458 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1458 20 14 1 201 14 1 1458 23 29.26 0.9 231 0 0.9 14581 241 01 0.9 241 0 0.9 14581 321 4.81 1 321 4.8 1 0 I CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MINIMUM LU Code lQuanfity OccupancyRate LU_Code Quantity Occupanc Rate 1458 36 2 1 36 2 1 1395 7 164 0.9 7 154 0.9 1395 10 120 0.9 10 20.19 0.9 1395 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1396 231 591.6 0.9 23 591.6 0.9 1397 23 165.04 0.9 23 165.04 0.9 1459 11 9 0.9 11 9 0.9 1459 21 131 0.9 21 131 0.9 1459 369 0.9 3 69 0.9 1459 7 34 0.9 71 34 0.9 1459 10 196.53 0.9 101 196.53 0.9 1459 11 4.25 1 ill 4.25 1 1459 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1459 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1459 17 0 1 17 0 1 1459 21 350 1 21 350 1 1459 23 60 0.9 23 60 0.9 1459 331 1.7 1 33 1.7 1 1459 371 4.97 1 37 4.97 1 1460 1 677 0.9 1 677 0.9 1460 2 194 0.9 21 194 0.9 1460 31 51 0.9 31 51 0.9 1460 191 2 1 19 2 1 1460 381 0.83 1 38 0.83 1 1461 11 214 0.9 1 214 0.9 1461 21 263 0:9 2 263 0:9 1461 101 4.99 0.9 10 4.99 0.9 1461 131 20 0.9 13 20 0.9 1461 171 8.29 1 17 8.29 1 1461 201 352 1 201 352 1 1461 231 12 0.9 23 12 0.9 1461 261 5.04 0.9 26 5.04 0.9 1461 381 0.78 1 38 0.78 1 1462 11 32 0.9 1 32 0.9 1463 31 520 0.9 3 520 0.9 1463 101 112.45 0.9 10 112.45 0.9 1463 131 21.55 0.9 13 21.55 0.9 1463 161 17.42 1 16 17.42 1 1464 11 43 0.9 1 43 0.9 1464 21 3119 0.9 21 3119 0.9 1464 61 4 0.9 61 4 0.9 1464 101 73.07 0.9 101 73.07 0.9 1464 131 16.55 0.9 131 16.55 0.9 1464 151 5.43 0.9 151 5.43 0.9 1464 231 18.37 0.9 231 18.37 0.9 1464 24 2.75 0.9 241 2.75 0.9 1464 33 1.9 1 331 1.9 1 1464 36 3 1 36 3 1 1464 38 1.62 1 38 1.62 1 1465 5 397 0.95 5 397 0.95 1465 10 60.631 0.9 10 60.63 0.9 14651 13 18.19 0.9 13 18.19 0.9 14651 201 2181 1 20 218 1 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MINIMUM LU Code Quanti Occu anc Rate LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate 1465 23 30.31 0.9 23 30.31 0.9 1466 2 212 0.95 2 212 0.95 1466 7 754 0.9 7 754 0.9 1466 13 83.93 0.9 13 83.93 0.9 1466 19 16 1 19 16 1 1466 22 64 1 22 64 1 1466 231 6 0.9 231 6 0.9 1466 37 2.69 1 37 2.69 1 1466 40 2 1 40 2 1 1467 3 1185 0.95 3 1185 0.95 1468 29 320 1 29 320 1 1469 2 792 0.95 2 792 0.95 1469 3 225 0.95 3 225 0.95 1469 28 6.45 1 28 6.45 1 1469 291 294 1 291 294 1 1469 301 1801 1 30 1801 1 1469 361 34.96 1 36 34.96 1 1469 371 34.97 1 37 34.97 1 1469 381 8 1 38 8 1 1470 21 145 0.95 2 145 0.95 1470 101 78.23 0.9 10 78.23 0.9 1470 191 19 1 19 19 1 1470 231 11.66 0.9 231 11,66 0.9 1398 231 82.583 0.9 231 0 0.9 1399 231 108.52 0.9 23 0 0.9 1400 231 62.08 0.9 23 0 0.9 1471 11 460 0.95 1 460 0.95 1471 381 2 1 38 2 1 1472 161 209.75 1 16 209.75 1 1473 31 300 0.95 3 300 0.95 1474 11 1686 0.95 1 1686 0.95 1474 21 208 0.95 21 208 0.95 1474 31 736 0.95 3 736 0:95 1474 101 35 0.9 10 35 0.9 1474 131 6.35 0.9 13 6.35 0.9 1474 381 14.23 1 38 14.23 1 1475 251 81.73 0.9 25 81.73 0.9 1475 271 196,42 0.9 27 196.42 0.9 1475 291 52 1 29 52 1 1475 331 55.2 1 33 55.2 1 1475 361 100.28 1 36 100.28 1 1476 21 227 0.95 2 227 0.95 1477 11 Boo 0.95 1 500 0.95 1478 21 50 0.95 2 50 0.95 1479 11 101 0.95 1 101 0.95 1479 21 54 0.95 2 54 0.95 1480 21 144 0.95 21 144 0.95 1480 31 80 0.95 3 80 0.95 1401 24 86.096 0,9 24 86,096 0.9 1402 23 45.794 0.9 23 45.794 0.9 1481 1 101 0.95 1 101 0.95 1481 2 182 0.95 2 182 0.95 1481 10 2.3 0.9 10 2.3 0.9 9I0 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MINIMUM LU Code Quantity Occu ancyRate LU_Code Quantity OccupancyRate 1482 1 142 0.95 1 142 0.95 1482 2 43 0.95 2 43 0.95 1482 3 73 0.95 3 73 0.95 1482 40 181.2 1 40 181.2 1 1483 1 21 0.95 1 21 0.95 1484 7 425 0.9 7 425 0.9 1484 101 21.7 0.9 10 21.7 0.9 1484 131 0 0.9 131 0 0.9 1484 231 955.03 0.9 231 950 0.9 1485 91 1633.84 0.8 9 1464 0.8 1485 10 0 0.9 10 0 0.9 1485 21 1700 1 21 1700 1 1486 2 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1486 3 245 0.95 3 245 0.95 1486 10 125.68 0.9 10 125.68 0.9 1486 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1486 16 0 1 16 0 1 1486 231 881 0.9 23 1253.812 0.9 1486 31 40 1 31 40 1 1487 21 69 0.95 2 69 0.95 1487 71 611 0.9 7 611 0.9 1487 101 7.5 0.9 10 7.5 0.9 1487 191 22 1 19 22 1 1487 231 11.63 0.9 23 11.63 0.9 1487 40 99.4 1 401 99.4 1 1488 21 122 0.95 2 122 0.95 1489 21 228 0.95 21 228 0.95 1489 101 5 0.9 101 5 0.9 1490 231 115.8 0.9 231 170.8 0.9 1403 71 471 0.9 71 4710.9 1403 101 16 0.9 101 46.8 0.9 1403 181 0 1 181 0 1 1403 231 393.05 0.9 231 432.355 0.9 1403 371 10.9 0.9 371 10.9 0.9 1491 231 468.64 0.9 23 923.64 0.9 1491 241 351.95 0.9 24 351.95 0.9 1492 101 38.1 0.9 10 38.1 0.9 1492 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1492 181 0 1 18 0 1 1492 211 2150 1 21 2150 1 1492 231 442.11 0.9132 443.26 0.9 1493 23 409.51 0.9 414.51 0.9 1494 10 105 0.9 105 0.9 1494 32 65 1 65 1 1495 1 416 0.9 416 0.9 1495 2 37 0.9 37 0.9 1495 10 2.38 0.9 2.38 0.9 1495 171 62.02 1 17 62.02 1 1495 20 283 1 20 283 1 1495 23 186.53 0.9 231 186.53 0.9 1495 38 6.53 1 381 6.53 1 1496 1 73 0.9 1 73 0.9 1496 2 266 0.9 2 256 0.9 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MINIMUM LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate LU Code Quantity Occupanc Rate 1496 3 152 0.9 3 152 0.9 1496 29 12.03 1 29 12,03 1 1497 1 143 0.9 1 143 0.9 1497 2 214 0.9 2 214 0.9 1497 3 48 0.9 3 48 0.9 1498 1 234 0.9 1 234 0.9 1498 21 01 0,9 2 0 0.9 1498 31 481 0.9 3 61 0.9 1498 101 92.44, 0.9 10 41.469 0.9 1498 131 01 0.9 13 0 0.9 1498 231 23.98 0.9 23 0 0.9 1498 381 3.6 1 38 3.6 1 1499 11 144 0.9 1' 0 0.9 1500 11 178 0.95 11 178 0.95 1500 381 1.03 1 38 1.03 1 1501 11 849 0.9 1 0 0.9 1501 21 0 0.9 2 0 0.9 1501 101 106.84 0.9 10 0 0.9 1501 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1501 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1501 211 0 1 21 0 1 1501 231 36.05 0.9 231 0 0.9 1501 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1501 381 2.5 1 38 0 1 1502 11 186 0.9 1 849 0.9 1502 21 0 0.9 2 0 0.9 1502 101 104.41, 0.9 10 83.396 0.9 1502 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1502 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1502 231 33.09 0.9 231 0 0.9 1502 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1404 231 434.953 '0.9 23 434.953 0.9 1405 101 129.3 0.9 10 128.61 0.9 1405 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1405 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1405 231 688.16 0.9 23 695.157 0.9 1406 25 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1406 26 430 0.9 261 606.37 0.9 1407 10 31.72 0.9 101 31,72 0.9 1407 15 1.56 0.9 15 1.56 019 1407 23 124.99 0.9 23 124.99 0.9 14,07 24 3.77 0.9 24 3.77 0.9 1503 1 52 0.9 1 0 0.9 1503 21 0 0.9 2 0 0.9 1503 10 88.021 0.9 10 21.444 0.9 1503 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1503 15 0 0.9 151 0 0.9 1503 18 0 1 18 0 1 1503 23 9.97 0.9 23 0 0.9 1503 24 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 15041 1 542 0.95 1 186 0.95 15041 21 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1504 10' 88.02 0.9 10 78.212 0.9 R �� CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MINIMUM LU_Code lQuantity OccupancyRate LU_Code Quantity OccupancyRate 1504 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1504 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1504 181 0 1 18 0 1 1504 231 9.97 0.9 23 0 0.9 1504 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1504 361 12.34 1 36 0 1 1505 11 843 0.95 1' 0 0.95 1505 21 0 0.95 21 0 0.95 1506 101 58.9 0.9 101 20.111 0.9 1505 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1505 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1505 23 35 0.9 23 0 0.9 1505 321 3.8 1 321 0 1 1505 331 5 1 331 0 1 1506 11 363 0.95 11 0 0.95 1506 21 0 0.95 21 0 0.95 1506 31 6 0.95 31 0 0.95 1507 11 142 0.95 11 142 0.95 1507 381 0.78 1 381 0.78 1 1508 11 228 0.95 1 228 0.95 1508 21 120 0.95 2 120 0.95 1508 31 120 0.95 3 120 0.95 1508 291 790 1 29 790 1 1508 371 5.85 1 37 5.85 1 1510 11 200 0.95 1 200 0.95 1511 11 20 0.95 1 20 0.95 1511 101 70.79 0.9 101 70.79 0.9 1512 21 246 0.95 21 24,6 0.95 1513 11 348 0.95 1 348 0.95 1513 4 100 1 4 100 1 1513 18 1 1 18 1 1 1513 37 24.07 1 37 24.07 1 1514 1 41 0.95 1 41 0.95 1515 3 388 0.95 3 388 0.95 1515 28 8.4 1 281 8.4 1 1556 3 1220 0.9 3 0 0.9 1558 31 1052 0.9 31 7 0.9 1558 231 17.8 0,9 23 0 0.9 1558 261 82.2 0.9 26 0 0.9 1559 1 225 0.9 1 0 0.9 1559 3 238 0.9 3 7 0.9 1559 10 50 0.9 101 0 0.9 1559 23 117.8 0.9 23 0 0.9 1559 26 82.2 0.9 26 0 0.9 1713 34 443 1 34 443 1 U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\TGcalc\LandUseAltsTGCom are\LuForModeil LuChan eCom are.xls SubMin i'l 11 SUB/ ' Ana/ysls Year: Runld: Lend Use: Network: Total Trip Ends By NBTM TAZ 2040 Rererence Number: 01232 SAmax1 Build Date: 4/15/2005 SAmax1 Build Time: 10:30:00 AM Bo06 Modeler. Marlle Whiteman ' NBTM TAZ M AUr ND Prod NSch Attr NSch Prod NW Attr BW Prod M AM 00 Prod BW Attr OW Prod Total 1373 588 0 0 0 386 0 410 419 264 269 2,336 ' 1374 663 0 0 0 399 0 457 466 281 286 2,550 1375 965 0 0 0 581 0 666 678 409 416 3,715 ' 1376 1,059 0 0 0 637 0 730 744 449 456 4,074 1377 1,517 0 0 0 1,323 0 1,133 1,158 831 865 6,826 1378 1,737 0 0 0 1,515 0 1,297 1,326 951 990 7,816 1379 486 0 0 0 1,288 0 477 514 661 678 4,104 1380 221 0 0 0 564 0 216 233 300 307 1,862 1381 309 0 0 0 817 0 303 326 419 430 2,603 ' 1382 604 582 0 92 1,333 603 634 671 741 661 5,942 1383 276 0 0 0 731 0 271 292 375 385 2,330 ' 13B4 202 0 0 0 535 0 198 213 274 281 1,703 1385 448 86 0 14 658 89 423 429 374 400 2,920 1386 215 0 0 0 571 0 211 227 293 300 1,817 1387 242 0 0 0 641 0 237 256 329 337 2,042 1388 1,676 0 0 0 300 0 994 995 372 374 4,611 li ' 1389 656 0 0 0 871 0 520 543 496 507 3,594 1390 221 0 0 0 584 0 216 233 300 307 1,860 1391 147 0 0 0 389 0 144 155 199 204 1,238 1392 486 0 0 0 597 0 378 394 345 353 2,554 1393 1,014 0 0 0 659 0 706 721 452 460 4,012 ' 1394 764 0 0 0 746 0 605 614 455 488 3,671 1395 454 0 0 0 337 0 342 345 222 239 1,939 1396 777 0 0 0 2,057 0 762 820 1,055 1,012 6,554 ' 1397 217 0 0 0 574 0 213 229 294 302 1,828 139E 910 382 0 60 192 395 629 630 251 202 3,651 1399 79 382 0 60 34 395 105 105 55 5 1,218 ' 1400 46 224 0 35 20 232 61 61 32 3 715 1401 272 0 0 0 339 0 236 239 195 215 1,496 ' 1402 60 0 0 0 159 0 59 63 82 84 507 1403 1,794 0 0 0 2,576 0 1,522 1,574 1,444 1,522 10,433 1404 643 347 0 55 1,544 359 655 698 826 800 5,927 1405 2,736 691 0 109 2,799 716 2,145 2,215 1,736 1,679 14,826 1406 120 0 0 0 1,381 0 240 288 648 648 3,326 ' 1407 624 0 0 0 535 0 454 467 337 344 2,761 Friday, April 15, 2005 5')j Page 1 of 6 Analysis Year. Runid: Lend Use: Network: 2040 SAmax1 SAmax1 B006 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/1512005 Build Time: 10:30:00 AM Modeler. Marcie Whiteman WTM TAZ MO AM NO Prod Nish Attr NSOh Prod MW AM NW Prod 00 Attr 00 Prod OW Or OW Prod TOW 1408 94 522 0 48 45 267 97 97 47 21 1,239 1409 1,835 0 0 0 2,970 0 1,571 1,642 1,630 1,693 11,341 1410 31 247 0 28 11 152 44 45 18 2 579 1411 34 0 0 0 16 0 24 24 12 13 124 1412 39 216 0 20 19 111 40 40 19 9 513 1413 451 93 0 11 487 57 374 381 293 308 2,454 1414 98 476 8 40 159 172 119 122 95 82 1,371 1415 103 551 0 51 66 282 108 109 58 32 1,360 1416 126 668 0 66 62 365 128 128 64 29 1,636 1417 36 202 0 19 18 103 37 38 18 8 478 1418 38 209 0 20 18 109 39 39 19 9 500 1419 112 623 0 58 54 319 116 116 56 25 1,478 1420 300 1,648 0 155 146 857 309 309 149 68 3,940 1421 3,080 1,477 560 137 1,600 840 2,237 2,266 1,240 1,166 14',603 1422 316 1,737 0 163 164 903 325 326 157 71 4,152 1423 236 943 0 88 233 490 255 255 163 130 2,793 1424 504 3,694 0 327 185 2,146 723 723 298 27 8,627 1425 204 0 0 0 502 0 197 210 260 267 1,640 1426 97 422 0 40 120 219 106 108 79 61 1,252 1427 1,882 2,978 1,922 280 1,103 1,594 1,538 1,556 867 715 14,435 1428 5,016 1,454 0 120 1,665 699 3,417 3,430 1,543 1,512 18,856 1429 468 2,554 384 236 305 1,319 499 502 269 141 6,677 1430 4,807 511 0 45 1,746 284 3,209 3,234 1,532 1,521 16,889 1431 2,125 358 0 25 629 181 1,409 1,417 616 599 7,361 1432 2,024 2,666 0 270 552 1,534 1,549 1,552 638 476 11,263 1433 450 1,347 0 162 1,022 793 548 574 581 505 5,981 1434 2,201 0 0 0 4,658 0 2,846 2,798 2,247 3,330 18,081 1435 400 319 0 32 91 174 277 278 109 92 1,772 1436 664 3,108 0 333 527 2,041 833 840 474 231 9,051 1437 1 0 0 0 11 0 2 2 5 5 27 1438 86 0 547 0 326 0 96 106 162 164 1,487 1439 1,435 1,613 0 163 2,022 1,074 1,324 1,379 1,209 1,090 11,308 1440 97 766 0 90 36 486 139 139 58 5 1,806 1441 794 2,382 0 215 420 1,257 739 741 374 255 7,176 1442 105 745 0 83 46 449 138 138 60 13 1,777 1443 224 1,551 0 165 95 916 288 288 126 28 3,682 1444 235 1,713 0 190 93 1,036 312 313 133 23 4,048 Friday, April 15, 2005 59 Page 2 of 6 II 'I Analysis Year: Runld: Land Use: Network: 2040 SAmaxl SAmaxl B006 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 10:30:00 AM Modeler Media Whiteman OTM TAI NO Attr NO Prod NSch Attr NSch Prod OW Attr WPM NO Attr 00 Prod ON AM OW Prod Total 1445 250 1,681 0 173 103 667 323 323 142 28 3,690 1446 164 1,102 0 118 71 642 203 203 90 24 2,617 1447 189 1,290 0 134 76 516 247 248 108 19 2,828 1448 487 527 0 51 157 201 361 362 161 129 2,436 1449 1,223 678 0 66 249 266 846 847 323 273 4,772 1450 1,409 699 0 71 757 279 1,044 1,056 583 546 6,443 1451 1,519 349 0 36 645 140 1,073 1,077 534 535 5,909 1452 2,303 726 0 67 456 277 1,534 1,535 581 528 8,008 1453 1,739 279 0 26 366 107 1,134 1,135 438 420 5,645 1454 770 370 0 40 193 153 535 536 217 194 3,008 1455 1,718 990 0 107 439 409 1,199 1,203 494 424 6,984 1456 571 3,838 0 252 252 1,010 647 648 267 112 7,597 1457 720 2,211 342 221 563 853 751 754 440 315 7,171 1458 791 3,209 0 319 294 1,250 812 813 360 148 7,997 1459 2,850 504 0 52 882 203 1,911 1,920 847 827 9,996 1460 504 2,728 0 250 249 995 547 548 262 112 6,194 1461 971 1,716 0 129 346 503 773 777 341 261 5,819 1462 21 128 0 9 10 36 22 22 10 4 262 1463 2,230 1,640 0 ill 470 462 1,571 1,574 592 502 9,152 1464 2,447 7,683 0 837 748 3,189 2,373 2,378 997 438 21,090 1465 1,435 869 0 116 409 467 1,017 1,021 441 368 6,143 1466 3,073 476 0 68 2,406 367 2,483 2,488 1,511 1,801 14,671 1467 404 2,829 0 268 151 1,760 574 574 245 22 6,826 1468 5 0 282 0 55 0 10 12 26 26 415 1469 543 2,586 1,844 304 903 1,704 756 770 592 433 10,494 1470 1,232 480 0 46 412 251 881 881 369 405 4,957 1471 317 2,058 0 153 146 848 347 347 149 68 4,432 1472 2,318 0 0 0 675 0 1,496 1,504 654 661 7,308 1473 118 1,043 0 68 38 445 176 176 62 6 2,132 1474 1,984 8,328 0 793 767 4,560 1,945 1,947 876 404 21,604 1475 291 0 46 0 1,112 0 372 395 551 596 3,358 1476 90 861 0 72 29 393 136 136 47 4 1,769 1477 347 2,291 0 166 157 921 381 382 161 73 4,879 1478 20 190 0 16 6 86 30 30 10 1 390 1479 92 668 0 51 39 280 109 109 44 16 1,406 1480 92 899 0 64 29 368 140 140 46 4 1,783 1481 177 1,236 0 92 61 501 213 213 77 25 2,594 ' Frlday, April 15, 2005 155 Page 3 of 6 Analysis Year Runld., Lend Use., Network., 2040 SAmaxl SAmaxl B006 Reference Number 01232 Build Date.,4115/2005 Build7lme: 10;30,00 AM Modeler. Marile Whitemon ' , lBTM TAZ NO AUr NO Prod Rob AM IN Prod NW Attr NW Prod 00 AUr 00 Prod OW Or OW Prod TOW 1482 333 1.152 0 77 205 444 332 332 164 128 3,167 ' 1483 15 102 0 7 7 39 17 17 7 3 213 1484 2,089 163 0 26 4,164 169 1,933 2,034 2,225 2,293 15,095 1485 11,356 0 0 0 2,899 0 7,297 7,319 3,019 3,062 34,953 ' 1486 3,448 831 0 55 4,888 364 2,873 2,999 2,769 2,793 21,019 1487 1,157 248 0 22 1,472 119 1,060 1,069 832 961 6,939 , 1488 47 438 0 39 16 211 71 71 25 2 920 1489 154 818 0 73 42 394 173 173 63 20 1,910 1490 224 0 0 0 594 0 220 237 305 312 1,892 ' 1491 2.455 0 0 0 4,621 0 2,238 2,342 2,477 2,598 16,731 1492 1,261 0 0 0 1,760 0 1,016 1,062 992 1,017 7,106 1493 544 0 0 0 1,441 0 534 575 739 758 4,592 ' 1494 1,476 0 0 0 560 0 996 999 476 497 5004 1495 1,107 1,667 0 125 1,080 501 956 976 693 641 7,745 ' 1496 190 1,478 11 121 73 474 261 261 103 18 2,990 1497 175 1,143 0 107 74 418 216 216 95 24 2,467 1498 853 981 0 83 212 335 619 619 250 197 4,148 ' 1499 88 478 0 40 43 180 91 91 44 20 1,055 1500 122 774 0 59 67 328 132 132 58 26 1,688 ' 1501 11975 3,390 0 251 550 1,012 1,504 1,506 616 464 11,269 1502 1503 1.422 561 790 275 0 0 67 20 308 117 269 83 962 377 963 377 374 144 332 131 5,486 2,085 ' 1504 1,090 1,964 0 189 338 1,057 839 840 366 265 6,948 1505 1.181 2.983 0 287 432 1,600 975 977 446 296 9,177 , 1506 496 1,266 0 122 180 678 408 409 187 122 3,867 1507 98 631 0 47 45 262 107 107 46 21 1,363 1508 275 1,691 695 141 286 $06 343 348 211 130 4,927 ' 1510 134 814 0 67 63 369 143 143 64 29 1,825 1511 938 81 0 7 182 37 598 598 225 223 2,889 1512 92 807 0 79 31 426 135 135 51 5 1,761 ' 1513 384 1,804 0 135 316 676 417 417 235 171 4,536 1514 26 173 0 14 13 76 30 30 13 6 382 ' 1515 173 1,160 0 a8 117 576 245 245 115 48 2,768 1516 107 512 0 41 202 160 161 155 124 99 1;541 1517 1,081 471 1,044 36 608 238 798 808 464 438 5,974 ' 1518 352 2.684 0 168 147 929 416 416 156 66 5.335 1519 320 1,889 0 158 159 875 340 340 158 75 4,314 ' Friday, April 15. 2005 C(D Page 4 of 6 ' Analysis Year: Runld: Land Use: Network: 2040 SAmaxl SAmax1 Bo06 Reference Number., Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 10:30:00 AM Modeler., Marlle Whiteman NITM TAZ NO AM NO Prod NNW NSch Prod NW Attr ROM Map OO Prod OW Attr OW Prod Total 1520 137 814 0 69 65 382 145 145 67 30 1,853 1521 396 2,307 438 193 274 1,069 427 431 230 129 5,894 1522 1,418 1,193 0 78 337 427 993 996 384 343 6,169 1523 195 1,266 0 64 240 278 263 265 160 120 2,851 1524 195 1,266 0 64 240 278 263 265 160 120 2,851 1525 406 3,288 0 249 141 1,633 595 596 227 20 7,156 1526 193 1,153 0 96 91 534 204 205 93 42 2,612 1527 46 399 0 40 16 216 68 68 26 2 880 1528 39 0 0 0 113 0 48 49 57 64 371 1529 355 4,331 362 193 139 842 550 552 148 45 7,515 1530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1531 821 1,721 0 127 267 677 672 673 280 205 5,443 1532 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1534 179 1,931 0 102 80 397 261 261 84 28 3,323 1535 355 4,331 362 193 139 842 550 552 148 45 7,515 1536 754 1,247 0 69 205 269 574 576 220 182 4,096 1537 754 1,247 0 69 205 269 574 576 220 182 4,096 1538 84 945 0 48 22 187 113 114 32 4 1,549 1539 109 1,141 0 58 110 227 151 155 77 44 2,073 1540 294 0 0 0 675 0 352 352 352 411 2,436 1541 90 956 0 58 51 226 120 121 46 18 1,687 1542 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 2 2 11 1543 61 0 0 0 292 0 72 82 142 142 792 1544 250 2,785 0 120 87 578 340 342 102 22 4,625 1545 67 749 0 33 11 161 90 90 22 0 1,225 1546 61 0 0 0 292 0 72 82 142 142 792 1547 179 1,931 0 102 80 397 261 261 84 28 3,323 1548 179 1,931 0 102 80 397 261 261 84 28 3,323 1549 179 1,931 0 102 80 397 261 261 84 28 3,323 1550 92 959 0 60 17 283 117 117 33 0 1,679 1551 45 495 0 22 7 108 60 60 15 0 811 1552 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1553 66 736 0 33 11 160 89 89 22 0 1,206 1554 55 402 0 18 108 87 77 79 62 52 939 1555 55 402 0 18 108 87 77 79 62 52 939 1556 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1557 99 449 0 28 18 150 92 92 31 11 968 ' Friday, April 15, 2005 C, Page 5 of 6 Analysis Year. Runld: Land Use: Network. 2040 Reference Number: 01232 SAmaxl Build Date: 4/15/2005 SAmaxl Build Time: 10:30:00 AM Bo06 Modeler, Media Whiteman NOTM TAZ NO AM NO Prod NBch Or Kch Prod NW AUP NW Prod ON Attr 00 Prod OW Attr OW Prod Toth 1558 2 18 0 2 1 10 3 3 1 0 41 1559 8 18 0 2 15 10 11 11 9 9 91 1618 4 24 0 2 2 11 4 4 2 1 54 1713 434 0 0 0 2,140 0 620 670 1,042 1,104 6,010 1714 227 1',564 0 152 86 999 322 322 139 12 3,824 1715 682 0 0 0 604 0 537 543 378 410 3,154 1716 465 29 0 13 604 4 410 415 345 380 2,665 Friday, April 15, 2005 Sq Page 6 of 6 II APPENDIX T SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT TRIP GENERATION CHANGE FROM CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT BY TAZ 11 j REVISED SUBAREA MINIMUM TAZ TOTAL TAZ TOTAL CHANGE 1373 2274 1373 2336 62 1374 2274 1374 2550 276 1375 3481 1375 3715 234 1376 3638 1376 4074 436 1377 5229 1377 6826 1597 1378 5912 1378 7816 1904 1379 3873 1379 4104 231 1380 1757 1380 1862 105 1381 2457 1381 2603 146 1382 3562 1382 5942 2380 1383 2330 1383 2330 0 1384 1708 1384 1703 -5 1385 2645 1385 2920 275 1386 2528 1386 1817 -711 1387 2042 1387 2042 0 1388 4057 1388 4611 554 1389 4202 1389 3594 -608 1390 1623 1390 1860 237 1391 1079 1391 1238 159 1392 2534 1392 2554 20 1393 2222 1393 4012 1790 1394 3671 1394 3671 0 1395 6831 1395 1939 -3892 1396 6554 1396 6554 0 1397 1828 1397 1828 0 1398 915 1398 3651 2736 1399 1202 1399 1218 16 1400 688 1400 715 27 1401 1496 1401 1496 0 1402 507 1402 507 0 1403 8820 1403 10433 1613 1404 4818 1404 5927 1109 1405 12567 1405 14826 2259 1406 2358 1406 3326 968 1407 2761 1407 2761 0 1408 1239 1408 1239 0 1409 11341 1409 11341 0 1410 579 1410 579 0 1411 124 1411 124 0 1412 513 1412 513 0 1413 2454 1413 2454 0 1414 1371 1414 1371 0 1415 1360 1415 1360 0 1416 1636 1416 1636 0 1417 478 1417 478 0 1418 500 1418 500 0 1419 1478 1419 1478 0 1420 3940 1420 3940 0 1421 14603 14211 14603 0 1422 4152 1422 4152 0 1423 2793 1423 2793 0 14241 8627 1424 8627 0 _14251 1640 1425 1640 0 REVISED SUBAREA MINIMUM TAZ TOTAL TAZ TOTAL CHANGE 1426 1252 1426 1252 0 1427 9534 1427 14435 4901 1428 18856 1428 18856 0 1429 6677 1429 6677 0 1430 14652 1430 16889 2237 1431 6824 1431 7361 537 1432 8933 1432 11263 2330 1433 4953 1433 5981 1028 1434 18081 1434 18081 0 1435 1772 1435 1772 0 1436 9052 1436 9051 -1 1437 27 1437 27 0 1438 1487 1438 1487 0 1439 12964 1439 1130E A656 1440 1806 1440 1806 0 1441 8183 1441 7176 -1007 1442 1777 1442 1777 0 1443 3682 1443 3682 0 1444 4048 1444 4048 0 1445 3690 1445 3690 0 1446 2617 1446 2617 0 1447 2828 1447 2828 0 1448 2436 1448 2436 0 1449 3589 1449 4772 1183 1450 3935 1450 6443 2508 1451 4203 1451 5909 1706 1452 6227 1452 8008 1781 1453 15989 1453 5645 -344 1454 10211 1454 3008 -7203 1455 6984 1455 6984 0 1456 9691 1456 7597 -2094 1457 7171 1457 7171 0 1458 8321 1458 7997 -324 1459 9996 1459 9996 0 1460 6194 1460 6194 0 1461 5819 1461 5819 0 1462 262 1462 262 0 1463 9152 1463 9152 0 1464 21090 1464 21090 0 1465 6143 1465 6143 0 1466 14671' 1466 14671 0 1467 6826 1467 6826 0 1468 415 1468 415 0 1469 10434 1469 10434 0 1470 4957 1470 4957 0 1471 4432 1471 4432 0 1472 7308 1472 7308 0 1473 2132 1473 2132 0 1474 21604 1474 21604 0 1475 3358 1475 3358 0 1476 1769 1476 1769 0 1477 4879 1477 4879 0 1478 390 1478 390 0 REVISED SUBAREA MINIMUM TAZ TOTAL TAZ TOTAL CHANGE 1479 1406 1479 1406 0 1480 1783 1480 1783 0 1481 2594 1481 2594 0 1482 3167 1482 3167 0 1483 213 1483 213 0 1484 14630 1484 15095 465 1485 38940 1485 34953 -3987 1486 16889 1486 21019 4130 1487 6939 1487 6939 0 1488 920 1488 920 0 1489 1910 1489 1910 0 1490 1283 1490 1892 609 1491 11308 1491 16731 5423 1492 7094 1492 7106 12 1493 4536 1493 4592 56 1494 5004 1494 5004 0 1495 7745 1495 7745 0 1496 2990 1496 2990 0 1497 2467 1497 2467 0 1498 5773 1498 4148 -1625 1499 1055 1499 1055 0 1500 1688 1500 1688 0 1501 11328 1501 11269 -59 1502 5722 1502 5486 -236 1503 3884 1503 2085 -1799 1504 8078 1504 6948 -1130 1505 9847 1505 9177 -670 1506 3067 1506 3867 800 1507 1363 1507 1363 0 1508 4927 1508 4927 0 1510 1825 1510 1825 0 1511 2889 1511 2889 0 1512 1761 1512 1761 0 1513 4536 1513 4536 0 1514 382 1514 382 0 1515 2766 1515 2768 0 1516 1541 1516 1541 0 1517 5974 1517 5974 0 1518 5335 1518 5335 0 1519 4314 1519 4314 0 1520 1853 1520 1853 0 1521 5894 1521 5894 0 1522 6169 1522 6169 0 1523 2851 1523 2851 0 1524 2851 1524 2851 0 1525 7156 1525 7156 0 1526 2612 1526 2612 0 1527 880 1527 880 0 1528 371 1528 371 0 1529 7515 1529 7515 0 1530 0 1530 0 0 1531 5443 1531 5,443 0 1532 0 1532 0 0 1 1 1 REVISED SUBAREA MINIMUM TAZ TOTAL TAZ TOTAL CHANGE 1534 3323 1534 3323 0 1535 7515 1535 7515 0 1536 4096 1536 4096 0 1537 4096 1537 4096 0 1538 1549 1538 1549 0 1539 2073 1539 2073 0 1540 2436 1540 2436 0 1541 1687 1541 1687 0 1542 11 1542 11 0 1543 792 1543 792 0 1544 4625 1544 4625 0 1545 1225 1545 1225 0 1546 792 1546 792 0 1647 3323 1547 3323 0 1548 3323 1548 3323 0 1549 3323 1549 3323 0 1550 1679 1550 1679 0 1551 811 1551 811 0 1552 0 1552 0 0 1553 1206 1553 1206 0 1554 939 1554 939 0 1555 939 1555 939 0 1556 6858 1556 0 -6858 1557 968 1557 968 0 1558 7643 1558 41 -7602 1559 6792 1559 91 -6701 16 81 541 1618 54 0 17 31 60101 17131 6010 0 17141 3824 1714 3824 0 17151 31541 1715 3154 0 17161 26651 17161 2665 0 U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\TGcalc\LandUseAltsTGCom are\LuForModell rf Ch Com ahe:xls Com areSubMi I� APPENDIX U SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS 2. Superior & Placentia Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 2 3200 NBR 1 1600 3200 SBT 2 SBR d 1600 EBT 2 3200 EBR d 1600 WBT 11.5 3200 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM HOUR L VOL 430 .269 1520 .013* 019* 470 .147 10 .006 10 .006 350 .219 {.156 410 70 EBR .063* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION V3 725 PM HOC L VOL 310 .194* 660 30 .0119 .331 1060 * 10 .006 10 .006* 500 .313 500 4 .219* 220 EBR. .107* 3. Superior & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 280 480 NBT 1.5 4800 570 .192* 370 .200* NBR 0 70 110 SBL 1.5 200 210 SBT 1.5 4800 180 .079* 400 .127* SBR 2 3200 250 .078 930 .291 EBL 2 3200 1510 .472 440 .138* EBT 3 4800 3330 .694* 1350 .281 EBR d 1600 300 .188 310 .194 WBL 1 1600 50 .031* 210 .131 WBT 4 6400 800 .125 2940 .459* WBR d 1600 200 .125 150 .094 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .026* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 0.996 4. Newport & Hospital .950 Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 280 .175 270 .169* NBT 3 4800 1950 .406* 1710 .356 NBR 1 1600 90 .056 70 .044 SBL 1 1600 170 .106* 70 .044 SBT 3 4800 1200 .250 2230 .465* SBR d 1600 460 .288 260 .163 EBL 2 3200 270 .084 450 .141 EBT 1 1600 390 .244* 370 .231* EBR 1 1600 160 .100 200 .125 WBL 1 1600 130 .081* 230 .144* 32000 4100 .134 2600 .088 WBR 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 837 1.009 U `i 5. Newport & Via Lido Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 3 4800 1960 .408* 1230 .256* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 40 ..025 SBL 2 3200 350 .109* 500 .156* 4800 890 .185 1910 .398 SBR 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 EBR 1600 30 .019* 60 .038* WBT 0 WBR 2 3200 440 .138 590 .184 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .010* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 6. Newport & 32nd Subarea Minimum 546 450 AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006* 20 .013* NBT 3 4800 1250 .260 890 .185 NBR d 1600 30 .019 30 .019 SBL 1 1600 50 .031 90 .056 SBT 2 3200 820 .291* 1380 .525* SBR 0 0 110 300 EBL 1.5 460 160 EBT 0.5 3200 30 .153* 50 .066* EBR 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006 WBL 0.5 50 .031* 30 WBT 3200 .019 60 .028* WBR f.5 130 150 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .481 .632 u5 7. Riverside & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 1 1600 10 .013* 10 .019* NBR d 1600 0 .000 10 .006 SBL 0.5 110 {.069}* 70 {0441* SBT 0.5 1600 10 .075 10 .650 SBR 1 1600 400 .250 560 .350 EBL 1 1600 450 .281 380 .238* EBT 2 3200 2980 .934* 2160 .681 EBR 0 0 10 20 WBL 1 1600 10 .006* 50 .031 WBT 3 4800 1680 .350 3790 .790* WBR 1 1600 50 .031 50 .031 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .061* Note: Assumes Right Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 8. Tustin & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum NBL BT NBR SBL SBR EBT EBR WBL WBR LANES CAPACITY 0 1600 0 0 0 0 0 1600 2 3200 0 0 0 0 1600 1 1.022 1.152 AM PK'HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 10 {.006}* 10 {006)* 10 .019 10 .619 10 10 110 100 10 .100* 10 .106* 40 60 20 .013 130 .081* 2980 .934* 2030, .'638 10 10 0 0 1720 .358 3260 .679* 70 .044 130 .081 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION U(0 1.040 .872 II II 9. MacArthur & Campus Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 4 6400 NBR 1 1600 6400 SBT 4 SBR 1 1600 EBT 3 4800 EBR d 1600 4800 WBT 3 WBR f Right Turn Adjustment AM HOUR L VOL 1380 .216* 110 .069 1150 .180 510 .319 850 .266* .206 200 .125 130 41 .0113* 540 60 SBR .022* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 10. MacArthur & Birch Subarea Minimum PK HOUC VOL 340 .213* 1490 .233 100 .063 150 .094 1370 .214* 930 .581 570 .178* .123 140 .088 050 .315* 1510 190 SBR .367* 773 1.287 AM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 50 .031 NBT 3 4800 1270 .265* NBR 1 1600 120 .075 SBL 1 1600 260 .163* SBT 4 6400 810 .169 SBR 0 0 410 .256 EBT 1.5 4800 590 .229* EBR 0 50 WBL 1 1600 50 .,031 WBT 3200 220 .091* WBR f Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .748 U-7 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 200 .125* 1060 .038 150 .094 1170 .231* 310 470 470 .210* 70 950 .297* 380 11. Von Karman & Campus Subarea Minimum NBT NBR SBT SBR EBT EBR WBT WBR LANES CAPACITY 2 3200 f 2 3200 0 0 3200 2 1 1600 2 3200 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 12. MacArthur & Von Karman Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 3 4800 NBR 1 1600 SBT 3 4800 SBR 1 1600 EBT 2 3200 EBR f 1600 WBT 1 WBR f Right Turn Adjustment AM HOUR PM HOC VOL L VOLK 20 .013 10 .006* 890 .278* 660 .206 30 20 40 .025* 190 .119 570 .212 1130 .431* 110 250 340 .213* 250 .156* 750 950 .031 .031 480 .172* 1090 .384* 70 140 688 .977 AM PK HOUR VOL V/C 1100 1470 .306* 500 .313 50 .031* 190 .119 40 .025* 140 .050 180 056 220 .8* 50 NBR .007* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION VB .507 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 60 .038* 190 .119 21252 10 .* 110 .069 290 .091* 130 830 .259* 210 .131 10 640 13. Jamboree & Campus Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY 600 6400 NBT 4 NBR 0 0 SBT 3 4800 SBR 0 0 200 EBT 2 300322 EBR f WBL 00 WBT 2 3200 WBR 1 1600 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 60 .038 100 .063* 22320 398* 1840 30 .463 650 .203* 340 .106 1570 .400 2750 .652* 280 .088* 680 .213* 310 .097 840 .263 20 10 730 .228 350 .109 770 .241* 620 .194* 120 .075 520 .325 WBR .131* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 14. Jamboree & Birch Subarea Minimum .930 1.253 AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 370 .231* 140 .088 4800 2220 .477 1810 .388* NBR 0 SBL 1 1600 10 .006 110 .069* 6400 18840 .286* 2210 .345 SBR f 20 EBL 1.5 200 650 EBBT 3200 130 .103* .216* R f.5 3440 1600 .188* 110 .131* WBR 0 150 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION -11 -2 LA 15. Campus & Bristol (N) Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 3 4800 NBR 0 0 SBT 4 6400 SBR 2 3200 EBL 0 EBT 0 EBR 0 0 WBT 4 6400 WBR 0' 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HO/C HOUR VOL V OLPK 510 .159 580 .181* 3170 .660* 1590 .331 430 .067 1970' .308* 330 .103 1260 .394 0 0 0 0 310 .097 450 .141 1580 .313* 3100 .506* 420 140 SBR .086* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .973 1.081 16. Birch & Bristol (N) Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 2 3200 NBR 0 0 SBL SBT 1.5 6400 SBR 2.5 EBT 0 0 EBR 0 0 WBL 1.5 3.5 8000 WBR Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 120 .038 170 .053* 1430 .447* 510 .159 0 0 180 .075 790 .373* 300 1600 0 0 0 0 1590 .331* 1760 .301* 760 .475 120 WBR .144* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 922 727 17. Campus/Irvine & Bristol (S) Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 5 8000 NBR 0 0 4800 SBT 3 SBR 0 0 EBL 1.5 EBT 2.5 6400 EBR 2 3200 WBL 0 0 WBT WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 0 0 2360 .359* 1440 .275* 100 .063* 350 .219* 650 135 2060 .429 1320 {.505}* 460 {.284}* 1910 .505 1360 .284 620 .194 600 .188 0 0 0 0 NBR .006* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 18. Birch & Bristol (S) .927 .778 Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 2.5 6400 580 .155* 290 .091 NBR 1.5 410 320 .100 SBL 2 3200 200 .063* 420 .131 3200 390 .122 910 .284* SBR 0 EBL 1.5 990 330 EBT 3.5 8000 14110 .323* 1570 .253* EBR WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION vll 541 .537 19, Irvine & Mesa Subarea Minimum HV/C HVUC LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 1 1600 100 .063 50 .031* NBT 3 4800 2000 .417* 960 .200 NBR 1 1600 630 .394 190 .119 SBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 SBT 3 4800 990 .206 2190 .456* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 210 131 EBL 1 1600 360 .225* 90 .056* EBT 2 3200 420 .131 90 .028 EBR 1 1600 50 .031 240 .150 WBL 2 3200 150 .047 470 .147 WBT 1 1600 80 .056* 580 .369* WBR 0 0 10 10 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 20. Irvine & University .704 .912 Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 190 .119 200 .125* NBT 2 3200 2450 .766* 1080 .338 NBR 1 1600 60 .038 20 .013 SBL 1 1600 90 .056* 40 .025 SBT 2 3200 970 .303 2680 .838* SBR 1 1600 130 .081 410 .256 EBL 1 1600 490 .306* 240 .150* EBT 2 3200 120 .038 30 .009 EBR d 1600 230 .144 150 .094 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBT 1 1600 30 .019* 90 .056* WBR d 1600 20 .013 50 .031 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1.147 1.169 UM 21. Irvine & Santiago Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 2 3200 NBR 0 0 3200 SBT 2 SBR d 1600 EBL EBT 1 1600 EBR d 1600 WBT 1 1600 WBR d 1600 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR VOL V/C 1520 .478* 10 930 .291 40 .025 140 {.125}* 130 .081 20 60 050* 160 . WBR .050* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 22. Irvine & Highland Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY 3200 NBT 2 NBR d 1600 SBT 2 3200 SBR d 1600 EBT 1 1600 EBR d 1600 WBL 0 0 WBT 1 1600 WBR d 1600 Right Turn Adjustment 703 AM PK HOUR VOL V/C 1630 .509* 10 .006 1140 .356 20 .013 1.0501* 0 �.056 130 .081 20 30 .031* 60 .038 Multi .019* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Q13 .622 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 170 .106* 1130 .359 120 .075 1810 .566* 130' .081 700 .6817 170 .106 10 70 .044 EBR .012* /84 PM VOL V/C HOUR 90 .056* 1390 .434 20 .013 1720 .538* 70 .044 200 .6252 80 .050 10 50 .038* 10 .006 EBR .006* ebU li 1 23. Irvine & Dover Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY 2 3200 NBT NBR d 1600 SBT 2 3200 SBR d 1600 EBL 1 1600 1600 EBR 0 1600 WBT 1 WBR 1 1600 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 1290 .403* 1070 .334* 20 .013 20 .013 180 .113* 270 .169* 9110 1450 .006 .0311 90 .056 50 .031* 190 .163* 130 .163 70 130 20 .013* 40 .025 150 .094 270 .169* 340 .213 290 .181 WBR .093* WBR .012* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 24. Irvine & Westcliff 785 .715 Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 90 .028 290 .091* NBT 2 3200 990 .309* 700 .219 NBR d 1600 30 .019 10 .006 SBL 2 3200 340 .106* 130 .041 SBT 2 3200 680 .213 920 .288* SBR d 1600 170 .106 460 .288 EBL 2 3200 370 .116* 340 .106* EBT 2 3200 470 .181 570 .247 EBR 0 0 110 220 WBL 1 1600 30 .019 90 .056 3200 460 .159* 920 .319*10 WBR 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Ulq 690 .804 25. Dover & Westcliff Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 320 .100* 920 .288* NBT 2 3200 460 .144 700 .219 NBR SBT 1 1600 440 .275* 380 .238* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 30 .019 EBL 2 3200 80 .025* 160 .050* 0 EBR f 680 990 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 26. Dover & 16th r lft 576 Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 110 .069* 240 .150* NBT 2 3200 830 .259 1360 .425 NBR d 1600 20 .013 60 .038 SBL 1 1600 50 .031 50 .031 SBT 2 3200 1200 .375* 1010 .316* SBR d 1600 30 .019 50 .031 30 EBT 0.5 1600 10 .019* .031* EBR d 1600 280 .175 250 .156 WBL 1 1600 40 .025* 40 .025* WBT 1 1600 10 .006 30 .019 WBR 1 1600 50 .031 50 .031 Right Turn Adjustment EBR .156* EBR .125* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION U15 644 .b4/ 27. Dover & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum HO/C PK HOC LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOL NBL 1 1600 40 .025 20 .013 NBT 1 1600 70 .044* 80 .050* NBR 1 1600 50 .031 30 .019 SBL 3 4800 900 .188* 1110 .231* SBT 1 1600 60 .038 70 .044 SBR 1 1600 70 .044 140 .088 EBL 2 3200 70 .022 70 .022* EBT 3 4800 2850 .602* 2190 .460 EBR 0 0 40 20 WBL 1 1600 60 .038* 110 .069 WBT 3 4800 1770 .369 2890 .602* WBR f 740 1530 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 28. Bayside & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum .872 .905 HV/C HOUC LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOPK L NBL 2.5 470 550 NBT 4800 20 .104* 20 .123* NBR 0.5 SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 160 .100* SBT 1 1600 20 .013 30 .019 SBR d 1600 60 .038 140 .088 EBL 1 1600 110 .069 150 .094* EBT 3 4800 3150 .656* 2460 .513 EBR 1 1600 560 .350 700 .438 WBL 1 1600 50 .031* 20 .013 WBT 4 6400 1970 .325 3900 .631* WBR 0 0 110 140 Right Turn Adjustment SBR 007* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION U16 Iwo M. 29. MacArthur & Jamboree Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 3 4800 NBR 1 1600 SBT 3 4800 SBR f 4800 EBT 3 EBR f 3 4800 WBT WBR f Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 180 .056 200 .063* 1960 .408* 840 .175 570 .356 540 .338 120 .038* 260 .081 520 .108 1670 .348* 46 600 .188 230 .072 1910 .398* 1400 .292* 130 50 380 .119* 930 .291* 960 .200 1590 .331 NBR .008* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .963 1.002 30. Jamboree & Bristol (N) Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 3 4800 NBR 0 & 2.5 SBT 6400 SBR 1.5 0 EBT 0 EBR 0 0 WBT 0 0 WBR 0 0 AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 1220 .381 1040 .325* 3420 .713* 2540 .529 0 0 690 .197 1470 .364* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION V 1-1 713 31. Bayview Place & Bristol (S) Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBL NBT 0 0 NBR 2 3200 SBL 0 SBT 0 SBR 0 0 EBT 4 6400 EBR 1 1600 WBL 0 0 WBT WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 0 0 0 0 80 .025 360 .113 0 0 0 0 0 0 3730 .583* 3310 .517* 120 .075 10 .006 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR .025* NBR .113* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 32. Jamboree & Bristol (S) .608 .630 Subarea Minimum HV/C HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOPK L NBT 5 8000 2310 .295* 2600 .339* NBR 0 0 50 110 SBT 3 4800 660 .138 1490 .310 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 1.5 2170 .678* 980 {.517)* EBT 1.5 4800 600 .375 1500 .517 EBR 2 3200 1050 .328 1180 .369 WBL 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .973 .856 I1 I 33. Jamboree & Bayview Way Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY 6400 NBT 4 NBR 0 0 6400 SBT 4 SBR 1 1600 EBT 1 1600 EBR 1 1600 1600 WBT 1 WBR 1 1600 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 150 .094 70 .044 21880 .355* 24990 .402* 90 80 100 .063* 140 .088* 1460 .228 2470 .386 170 .106 80 .050 40 .013* 90 .028 10 40 .006 25 180 .11113 20 .013 50 .031* 50 .031 130 .081 Multi .044* Multi .179* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 34. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Univ. 481 .706 Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 NBT 3 4800 1650 .344* 1990 .415* NBR 1 1600 210 .131 300 .188 SBL 2 3200 90 .028* 380 .119* SBT 3 4800 1160 .242 1970 .410 SBR 1 1600 280 .175 370 .231 EBL 1.5 510 210 EBT 0.5 3200 120 .197* 100 .097* EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 1.5 280 .088* 200 4800 .063 420 .067* WBR f.5 300 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION V11 657 .698 35. Jamboree & Bison Subarea Minimum HOUR PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOL NBT 3 4800 1630 .340* 1950 .406* NBR d 1600 330 .206 180 .113 SBL 2 3200 90 .028* 160 .050* SBT 3 4800 1370 .285 1750 .365 SBR 1 1600 50 .031 90 .056.. EBL 1 1600 110 .069* 40 .025* EBR 11 1600 80 .050 10 .006 WBL 2 3200 230 .072* 360 .113* WBR 2 3200 220 .069 190 .059 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 36. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Ford Subarea Minimum 509 594 HV/C HV/C LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 2 3200 380 .119* 390 .122* NBT 3 4800 1750 .415 2050 .506 NBR 0 0 240 380 SBL 2 3200 60 .019 60 .019 SBT 3 4800 1710 .356* 2130 .444* SBR 1 1600 60 .038 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 170 .106 50 .031 EBT 1 1600 210 .131* 120 .075* EBR f 420 350 WBL 1.5 370 290 WBT 1.5 4800 510 .183* 150 .092* WBR 1 1600 80 .050 30 .019 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION U 2W .789 733 37. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 80 .050 NBT 3 4800 1460 .304* 2010 .419* NBR f 160 150 SBL 2 3200 590 .184* 470 .147* SBT 3 4800 1710 .356 2340 .488 SBR 1 1600 40 .025 200 .125 EBL 1.5 280 .088* 90 .028* EBT 1.5 4800 50 .031 30 .019 EBR 1 1600 50 .031 40 .025 WBL 2 3200 90 .028* 260 .081* WBT 1600 .006 .031 WBR f 420 650 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 38. Jamboree & Santa Barbara Subarea Minimum .604 b/b AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 1720 111110 NBR 1 1600 .1311* .069* SBL 2 3200 480 .150* 320 .100* 1210 2030 SBR 1 1600 .006 .019 EBL 1 1600 60 .038* 20 .013 1600 30 .025 10 .019* EBR 0 WBL 1.5 100 550 WBT 0.5 3200 10 .034* 10 .175* WBR 1 1600 60 .038 430 .269 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .004* WBR .094* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION vz.i 584 ./au 39. Jamboree & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 30 .019 3200 640 .238* 3660 .141* NBR 0 90 SBL 1 1600 200 .125* 200 .125* SBT 2 3200 280 .088 760 .238 SBR f 930 2210 EBL 3 4800 1360 .283* 920 .192* 6400 2210 .350 1770 .284 EBR 0 WBL 2 3200 130 .041 310 .097 6400 1440 .225* 2600 .406* WBR f TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 40. Santa Cruz & San Joaquin H. .871 .864 Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 100 .031 360 .113 1600 .025* .175* NBR 0 30 210 SBL 1 1600 20 .013* 10 .006* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR 1 1600 70 .044 60 .038 EBL 1 1600 60 .038 100 .063* EBT 3 4800 450 .138* 390 .119 EBR 0 0 210 180 WBL 1 1600 270 .169* 40 .025 WBT 3 4800 330 .075 520 .115* WBR 0 0 30 30 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .037* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION U 2.2 .382 .359 41. Santa Rosa & San Joaquin H. Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 170 .106* NBT 1 1600 10 .006* 20 .013 NBR 1 1600 200 .125 680 .425 SBL 1 1600 120 .075* 110 .069 SBT 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006* SBR 1 1600 20 .013 50 .031 EBL 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 4800 3180 .081* 650 .158* EBR 0 WBL 2 3200 730 .228* 490 .153* 4800 570 .142 2550 .071 WBR 0 90 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .254* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 42. Newport Center & Coast Hw. 390 .677 Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C 0 NBR 0 0 0 3200 30 .009* 310 .097* SBT 0 SBR f 90 810 EBL 2 3200 610 .191* 330 .103* EBT 3 4800 1900 .396 1770 .369 EBR 0 0 0 0 4800 1450 .302* 2050 .423* WBR f TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION v7.3 .502 623 1� 44. Avocado & San Miguel Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 130 .081 70 .044* NBT 1 1600 200 .125* 50 031 NBR 1 1600 90 .056 630 .394 SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 240 .150 SBT 1 1600 70 .044 250 .156* SBR 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .'006 EBT 2 3200 110 .041 680 .247* EBR 0 0 20 110 WBL 2 3200 530 .166 350 .109* WBT 2 3200 500 231* 620 .219 WBR 0 0 240 80 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .235* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 45. Avocado & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum .393 AM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 120 .075* NBT 1 1600 50 .031 NBR 1 1600 270 .169 SBT 0.5 3200 780 .047* SBR 1 1600 40 .025 EBL 1 1600 360 .225* EBT 3 4800 1540 .321 EBR d 1600 70 .044 WBL 1 1600 150 .094 WBT 3 4800 1700 .354* WBR 1 1600 130 .081 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .094* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .795 w,q 791 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 150 .094* 100 .063 150 .094 140 .153* 340 .213 180 .113 1830 .381* 80 .050 220 .138* 1740 363 60 .038 SBR .060* 1 J 11 1 1 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBL 1.5 NBT 0 4800 NBR 1.5 SBL 0 0 SBT 0 0 SBR 3200 EBT 2 EBR 0 0 WBT 2 3200 WBR 1 1600 Right Turn Adjustment AM VOL HOC 230 {.119}* 19 340 0 0 0 10 .00 1130 .353* 0 0 190 .1119 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBL 0 0 NBT 0 0 NBR 0 0 SBL 2 3200 f 0 SBR EBL 0 0 1600 EBR 1 2 3200 WBT WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 472 AM PK HOUR VOL V/C 0 0 0 840 .263* 10 0 300 .094* 160 .100, 290 .091 0 EBR .006* Vu5 PM PK HVUC VOL 260 .081* 0 90 .056 0 0 0 10 .006* 550 .172 0 640 760 .475 WBR .275* PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 0 0 0 280 .088* 70' 0 130 .081 640 .200* 0 382 .288 48. MacArthur & Bison Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 350 .109 280 .088* NBT 4 6400 3460 .541* 2750 .430 NBR f 200 130 SBL 2 3200 110 .034* 40 .013 SBT 4 6400 2630 .411 3230 .505* SBR 1 1600 330 .206 440 .275 EBL 2 3200 300 .094* 290 .091* EBT 2 3200 350 .109 180 .056 EBR f 270 210 WBL 2 3200 180 .056 220 .069 WBT 2 3200 370 .116* 410 .128* WBR 1 1600 130 .081 60 .038 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 49. MacArthur & ford/Bonita Cyn .785 .812 Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 .044 80 .025 NBT 4 6400 2020 .316* 2470 .386* NBR 1250 SBL 2 3200 600 .188* 1350 .422* SBT 4 6400 2800 .438 2500 .391 SBR f 10 60 EBL 2 3200 40 .013 10 .003 EBT 2 3200 390 .122* 580 .181* EBR 1 1600 80 .050 120 .075 WBL 2 3200 490 .153* 240 .075* WBT 2 3200 750 .234 420 .131 WBR f 1650 780 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 00 779 1.064 50. MacArthur & San Joaquin H. Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 70 .022 30 .009 NBT 3 4800 1560 .325* 1850 .385* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 20 .013 SBL 2 3200 550 .172* 750 .234* SBT 3 4800 1620 .338 1960 .408 SBR f 1200 550 EBL 2 3200 260 .081* 1030 .322* EBT 3 4800 320 .075 800 .188 EBR 0 0 40 100 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBT 2 3200 730 .228* 370 .116* WBR f 860 440 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 51. MacArthur & San Miguel Subarea Minimum .806 1.U5i AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 160 .050 190 .059* NBT 3 4800 1530 .319* 960 .200 NBR 1 1600 310 .194 450 .281 SBL 2 3200 10 .003* 10 .003 SBT 3 4800 980 .204 1520 .317* SBR 1 1600 720 .450 550 .344 EBL 2 3200 80 .025 940 .294* 2 3200 110 .053* 500 .203 EBR 150 WBL 2 3200 340 .106* 310 .097 WBT 2 3200 350 .109 300 .094* WBR d 1600 20 .013 40 .025 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .153* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .634 uz7 764 52. MacArthur & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBL 0 NBT- 0 NBR 0 0 3200 SBT 0 SBR f EBT 3 4800 EBR 0 0 WBT 3 4800 AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 0 0 0 0 0 0 530 .166* 830 .259* 410 820 840 .263* 660 .206* 1010 .210 1560 .325 0 0 0 0 1440 .300* 1580 .329*640 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .729 .794 53. SR•73 NB Ramps & Bonita Cyn Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY 3200 NBT 0 NBR 1 1600 SBL 0 0 SBT SBR 0 0 EBT 3 3200 EBR 1 1600 2 3200 WBT WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 590 .184* 90 .028* 380 .238 130 .081 0 0 0 0 0 0 890 1010 .056* .006* 550 .172* 340 .106* 1050 .328 1130 .353 NBR .054* NBR .053* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Uzg 688 .528 54. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Cyn Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBL 2 3200 NBT 0 0 NBR 1 1600 SBL 0 0 SBT 0 0 SBR 0 0 EBT 2 3200 EBR 1 1600 4800 WBT 3 WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 40 .013* 280 .088* 0 0 240 .150 270 .169 0 0 0 0 0 0 710 .222 810 .253* 190 .119 570 .356 190 .059 210 .066* 1470 .306* 1010 .210 NBR .137* Multi .184* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 55. Spyglass Hill & San Miguel 456 .591 Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 40 30 {.019}* NBT 1 1600 40 .050* 20 .031 NBR d 1600 160 .100 180 .113 SBL 0 0 50 (.031)* 20 SBT 1 1600 30 .050 30 .031* SBR 1 1600 40 .025 30 .019 EBL 1 1600 50 .031* 70 .044 EBT 2 3200 340 .106 540 .169* EBR d 1600 30 .019 50 .031 WBL 1 1600 100 .063 140 .088* WBT 2 3200 450 .141* 470 .147 WBR d 1600 30 .019 40 .025 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .050* NBR .075* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION U9,9 303 38Z 56. San Miguel & San Joaquin H. Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 2 3200 260 .122* 550 .288* NBR 0 0 130 370 SBL 1 1600 70 .044* 150 .094* SBT 2 3200 460 .144 350 .109 SBR 1 1600 460 .288 160 .100 EBL 2 3200 300 .094* 530 .166* 4800 560 .123 860 .181 EBR 0 10 WBL 2 3200 450 .141 260 .081 WBT 3 4800 1150 .258* 580 .133* WBR 0 0 90 60 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .034* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .552 .681 57. Goldenrod & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 130 .081* 60 .038* 1600 30 .025 30 .025 NBR 0 10 SBT 1 1600 10 .088* .038* SBR 0 0 60 20 EBL 1 1600 20 .013* 30 .019 EBT 2 3200 1210 .378 2090 .653* EBR d 1600 30 .019 70 .044 WBL 1 1600 40 .025 30 .019* WBT 2 3200 2810 .878* 1810 .566 WBR d 1600 10 .006 10 .006 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION U30 1.060 74B 58. Marguerite & San Joaquin H. Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 260 170 NBT 0.5 3200 50 .097* 60 .072* NBR 1 1600 30 .019 60 .038 SBL 1 1600 60 .038 80 .050 1600 .044* 40 .056* SBR 1 30 EBL 1 1600 20 .013* 40 .025 EBT 2 3200 420 .131 970 .303* EBR 1 1600 110 .069 320 .200 WBL 1 1600 30 .019 110 .069* WBT 3 4800 1080 .225* 650 .135 WBR d 1600 90 .056 50 .031 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 59. Marguerite & Coast Hw. .379 buu Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 150 .094* 170 .106* 1 1600 100 .106 1220 .131 NBR SBL 1 1600 60 .038 110 .069 SBBT 1 1600 .100* 120 .119* R 160 EBL 1 1600 80 .050* 100 .063 EBT 2 3200 1350 .422 2000 .625* EBR 1 1600 60 .038 110 .069 WBL 1 1600 50 .031 110 .069* WBT 2 3200 2020 .647* 1590 .509 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION \J31 919 60. Spyglass H. & San Joaquin H. Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 NBT 1 1600 0 .013* 10 .025* NBR 0 0 20 30 SBL. 1 1600 60 .038* 40 .025* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR d 1600 270 .169 140 .088 EBL 1 1600 70 .044* 240 .150* EBT 2 3200 630 .197 1000 .313 EBR 1 1600 20 .013 60 .038 WBL 1 1600 10 006 10 .006 WBT 2 3200 1100 .344* 620 .194* WBR d 1600 70 .044 70 .044 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .156* SBR .069* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 61. Poppy & Coast Hw. 595 .463 Subarea Minimum HV/C HV/C LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 NBT 1 1600 10 .019 10 .038* NBR 0 0 20 50 SBL 0 0 50 120 1.075)* SBT 1 1600 10 .044* 10 .088 SBR 0 0 10 10 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 20 .013 EBT 2 3200 1380 .434 1980 .622* EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013* WBT 2 3200 1940 .613* 1680 .531 WBR 0 0 20 20 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION v3l�- .669 .748 62. Newport Coast & SR-73 NB Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBR 3200 1270 .397* 850 .250 2 SBT 2 3200 430 .134 970 .303* SBR 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 1.5 310 270 WBT 0 3200 0 .134* 0 .100* WBR 0.5 120 50 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 64. Newport Coast & San Joaquin .531 .4UJ Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 .044 140 .044* 4800 1500 .313* 710 .148 NBR 0 SBT 3 4800 760 .158 1110 .231* SBR 1 1600 130 .081 380 .238 EBL 1 1600 510 .319* 310 .194* EBR 2 3200 90 .028 110 .034 0 WBT 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .007* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 033 632 .476 65. Newport Coast & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 006 10 .006 NBT 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBL 2 3200 290 .091* 790 .247* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR f 200 230 EBL 1 1600 260 .163* 140 .088* EBT 3 4800 960 .200 1650 .344 EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 4800 146G0 .304* 1260 •263* WBR f Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION UM 564 .604 APPENDIX V SUBAREA MINIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS WITH IMPROVEMENTS -1 2. Superior & Placentia Subarea Minimum LANES CAPACITY NBT 2 3200 NBR 1 1600 SBT 2 3200 SBR d 1600 3200 EBT 2 EBR d 1600 WBT 11.5 3200 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR VOL V/C 430 .269 1520 .013* 30 .019* 410 .006 .0156* 500 350 .219 (.1156 410 70 EBR .063* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION v3 PM HOC L VOL 310 .194* 660 .206 30 .019 70 .044 10 * 10 .006 10 .006* 500 .313 4500 .219* 220 EBR .107* 725 .857 I 3. Superior & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 280 .175 480 NBT 1.5 4800 570 .178* 370 .177* NBR 1 1600 70 .044 110 .069 SBL 1,5 200 210 SBT 1.5 4800 180 .079* 400 .127* SBR 2 3200 250 .078 930 .291 EBL 2 3200 1510 .472* 440 .138* EBT 4 6400 3330 .520 1350 .211 EBR d 1600 300 .188 310 .194 WBL 1 1600 50 .031 210 .131 WBT 5 8000 800 100* 2940 .368* WBR d 1600 200 .125 150 .094 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .025* SBR .026* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 4. Newport & Hospital .854 M. Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL VIC NBL 2 3200 280 .088 270 .084* NBT 3 4800 1950 .406* 1710 .356 NBR 1 1600 90 .056 70 .044 SBL 1 1600 170 .106* 70 .044 SBT 3 4800 1200 .,250 2230 .465* SBR d 1600 460 .288 260 .163 EBL 2 3200 270 .084 450 .141 EBT 1 1600 390 .244* 370 .231* EBR 1 1600 160 .100 200 .125 WBL 1.5 130 .081 230 WBT 1.5 4800 410 .134* 260 .106* WBR 0 20 20 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .890 VN I i FI j D F Fl F L I 5. Newport & Via Lido Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 3 4800 1960 .408* 1230 .256* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 40 .025 SBL 2 3200 350 .109* 500 .156* 4800 890 .185 1910 .398 SBR 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 1 1600 30 .019* 60 .038* WBR 2 3200 440 .138 590 .184 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .010* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 6. Newport & 32nd 546 .450 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006* 20 .013* NBT 3 4800 1250 .260 890 .185 NBR d 1600 30 .019 30 .019 SBL 1 1600 50 .031 90 .056 SBT 2 3200 820 .291* 1380 .525* SBR 0 0 110 300 EBL 1.5 460 160 EBT 0.5 3200 30 .153* 50 .066* EBR 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006 WBL 0.5 50 .031* 30 1.5 3200 .019 .028* WBR 130 150 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ER 632 V5' 7. Riverside & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C 10 NBT 11 1600 10 .013* .019* NBR d 1600 0 .000 10 .006 SBL 0.5 110 {.069}* 70 {044}* SBR 0.5 1600 .075 .650 410 510 EBL 2 3200 450 .141 380 .119* 4800 2980 .623* 2120 .454 EBR 0 WBL 1 1600 10 .006* 50 .031 6400 1650 .270 379D .600* WBR 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION B. Tustin & Coast Hw. .711 782 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 10 {.006}* 10 {.006)* 1600 10 .019 i0 .619 NBR 0 SBL 0 0 110 100 SBT 1600 40 .100* 110 .106* SBR 0 EBL 1 1600 20 .013 130 .081* EBT 3 4800 2980 .623* 2030 .425 EBR 0 0 10 10 WBT 3 4800 1720 .358 3260 .679* WBR 1 1600 70 .044 130 .081 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION V� .729 872 9. MacArthur & Campus Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 120 .038 340 .106 NBT 4 6400 1380 .216* 1490 .233* NBR 1 1600 110 .069 100 .063 SBL 1 1600 250 .156* 150 .094* 6400 1150 .180 13970 .214 SBR f EBL 2 3200 850 .266* 570 .178* 00 EBR d 1600 200 .125 140 .088 WBL 2 3200 130 .041 160 .050 WBT 3 4800 540 .113* 1510 .315* WBR f 60 190 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 10. MacArthur & Birch 751 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 50 .031 200 .125* NBT 3 4800 1270 .265* 1000 .208 NBR 1 1600 120 .075 60 .038 SBL 1 1600 260 .163* 150 .094 SBT 4 6400 810 .169 1170 .231* SBR 0 0 410 .256 310 EBL 1.5 460 470 EBT 1.5 4800 590 .229* 470 .210* EBR 0 50 70 WBL 1 1600 50 .031 130 .081 3200 220 .091* 950 .297* WBWBT f Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION v-7 748 . dbi 11, Von Karman & Campus Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006* NBT 3200 890 .278* 660 .206 NBR f 20 SBL 1 1600 40 .025* 190 .119 SBT 2 3200 570 .178 1130 .353* SBR 1 1600 110 .069 250 .156 EBL 1 1600 340 .213* 250 .156* EBT 2 3200 740 .231 960 .300 EBR 1 1600 50 .031 50 .031 WBL 1 1600 60 .038 40 .025 WBT 2 3200 480 .150* 1090 341* WBR 1 1600 70 .044 140 .088 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 12. MacArthur & Von Karman .666 .856 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 160 .100 60 .038* NBT 3 4800 1470 .306* 900 .188 NBR 1 1600 500 .313 190 .119 SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 100 .063 SBT 3 4800 590 .123 1210 .252* SBR 1 1600 190 .119 110 .069 EBL 1 1600 40 .025* 160 .100 EBT 2 3200 160 .050 290 .091* EBR 130 WBL 2 3200 180 .056 830 .259* WBTR 1 1600 220 .138* 210 .131 100 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .007* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION m 507 .640 13. Jamboree & Campus Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 100 .063* 6400 2320 .363* 1820 .284 NBR f SBL 2 3200 650 .203* 340 .106 SBT 4 6400 1570 .245 2750 .430* SBR 1 1600 350 .219 380 .238 EBL 3 4800 280 .058 680 .142 3200 310 .097* 840 .263* EBR f 20 10 WBL 2 3200 730 .228* 350 .109* WBR 3200 770 .241 .194 f 520 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 14. Jamboree & Birch ;oj Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 370 .231* 140 .088 4800 2220 .477 1810 .388* NBR 0 50 .SBL 1 1600 10 .006 110 .069* SBT 4 6400 1830 .286* 2210 .345 SBR f 840 320 EBL 1.5 200 650 3200 130 .103* .216* EEBBT f.5 380 WBL 01 WBT 1600 50 .188* 150 .131* WBR 0 0 190 10 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION :E 'tilt � v� 15. Campus & Bristol (N) Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 510 1159 580 181* NBT 3 4800 3170 .660* 1590 .331 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBL SBT 4.5 11200 430 .067 1970 .288* SBR 2.5 330 .069 1260 EBL 0 0 0 0 EBT EBR 0 0 0 0' WBL 2 3200 310 .097 450 .141 WBT 8000 1580 .198* 3140 .388* WBR f TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 16. Birch & Bristol (N) M 857 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 120 .038 170 .,053* NBT 3 4800 1430 .298* 510 .106 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBT 11.5 6400 180 .075 790 .373* SBR 2.5 300 1600 EBL 0 0 0 0 EBT EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 1.5 420 530 WBT 3.5 8000 1590 .251* 1760 .286* WBR 1 1600 760 .475 120 .075 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .224* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION TO .773 .712 17. Campus/Irvine & Bristol (S) Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 5 8000 2360 .295* 1720 .215* NBR 1 1600 510 .319 440 .275 SBL 1 1600 100 .063* 350 .219* SBT 3 4800 650 .135 2060 .429 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 1.5 1320 1.5051* 460 {.2841* 5 1620 1600 EBR 2 3200 .194 .188 0 WBR 0 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .024* NBR .060* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 18. Birch & Bristol (S) /its Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY 'VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 22.5 6400 580 .155* 290 .091 NBR 1.5 410 320 .100 SBL 2 3200 200 .063* 420 .131 SBT 2 3200 390 .122 910 .284* SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 1.5 990 330 3.5 8000 1410 .323* 1570 .253* EBR 12 WBT 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .541 bJ/ VII 19. Irvine & Mesa Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 100 .063 50 .031* NBT 3 4800 2000 .417* 960 .200 NBR 1 1600 630 .394 190 .119 SBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 SBT 3 4800 990 .206 2190 .456* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 210 .131 EBL 1 1600 360 .225* 90 .056* EBT 2 3200 420 .131 90 .028 EBR 1 1600 50 .031 240 .150 WBL 1.5 150 470 WBT 1.5 4800 800 .050* 5800 .221* WBR Right Turn Adjustment EBR 094* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 20. Irvine & University Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 190 .119 200 .125* NBT 3 4800 2450 .510* 1080 .225 NBR 1 1600 60 .038 20 .013 SBL 1 1600 90 .056* 40 .025 SBT 3 4800 970 .202 2680 .558* SBR 1 1600 130 .081 410 .256 EBL 1.5 490 .153* 240 .075* EBT 1.5 4800 120 .075 30 .019 EBR d 1600 230 .144 150 .094 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBT 1 1600 30 .019* 90 .056* WBR d 1600 20 .013 50 .031 Right Turn Adjustment EBR .019* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .738 .833 V►z I 1 1 C 21. Irvine & Santiago Subarea Minimum With Improvements LANES CAPACITY 3200 NBT 2 NBR 0 0 1600 SBR d EBT 11 1600 EBR d 1600 WBL O1 WBT 1600 WBR d 1600 Right Turn Adjustment VOL V/C 90 .056 1520 .478* 10 930 .291 40 .025 160 {.125}* 130 .081 60 .050* 160 .100 WBR .050* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 22. Irvine & Highland Subarea Minimum With Improvements LANES CAPACITY 3200 NBT 2 NBR d 1600 3200 SBT 2 SBR d 1600 01 EBT 1600 EBR d 1600 1600 WBR d Right Turn Adjustment 703 VOL V/C 9056 1630 .509* 10 .006 1140 .356 20 .013 10 {.056 130 .081 20 60 .038 Multi .019* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION V13 PM VOL HVUC L 1130 .359 20 1810 .566* 130 .081 760 {0017)* 170 .106 90 .063* 70 .044 EBR .012* /84 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 90 .056* 13434 20 .013 1720 .538* 70 .044 200 .6252}* 80 .050 10 10 .006 EBR .006* 622 .650 1 23. Irvine & Dover Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 NBT 2 3200 1290 .403* 1070 .334* NBR d 1600 20 .013 20 .013 SBL 1 1600 180 .113* 270 .169* SBT 2 3200 940 .294 1440 .450 SBR d 1600 10 .006 50 .031 EBL 1 1600 90 .056 50 .031* EBT 1 1600 190 .163* 130 .163 EBR 0 0 70 130 WBL 1 1600 20 .013* 40 .025 WBT 1 1600 150 .094 270 .169* WBR 1 1600 340 .213 290 .181 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .093* WBR .012* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 24. Irvine & Westcliff .785 .715 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 90 .028 290 .091* NBT 2 3200 990 .309* 700 .219 NBR d 1600 30 .019 10 .006 SBL 2 3200 340 .106* 130 .041 SBT 2 3200 680 .213 920 .288* SBR d 1600 170 .106 460 .288 EBL 2 3200 370 .116* 340 .106* EBT 2 3200 470 .181 570 .247 EBR 0 0 110 220 WBL 1 1600 30 .019 90 .056 32000 4600 .159* 92200 .319* WBR 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION V14 25. Dover & Westcliff Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 320 .100* 920 .288* 3200 460 .144 700 .219 NNBT BR p SBT 0 1600 440 .275* 380 .238* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 30 .019 2 3200 80 .025* 160 .050* EBT EBR f 680 990 0 0 WBR 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 26. Dover & 16th AN Subarea Minimum With Improvements LANES CAPACITY 3200 NBT 2 NBR d 1600 2 SBT 3200 SBR d 1600 EBL EBT 0.5 1600 EBR d 1600 1600 WBR 1 Right Turn Adjustment VOL V/C VOL V/G 110 .069* 240 .150* 820 13 .013 60 .038 1200 .37b* 1010 .316* 30 .019 50 .031 * * 280 .175 250 .156 40 * * 0 030 19 5 .1 5 .0 31 EBR .156* EBR .125* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .644 n4/ V15 27. Dover & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 20 .013 NBT 1 1600 70 .044* 80 .050* NBR 1 1600 50 .031 30 .019 SBL 3 4800 900 .188* 1110 .231* SBT 1 1600 60 .038 70 .044 SBR 1 1600 70 .044 140 .088 EBL 2 3200 70 .022 70 .022 4800 2840 .602* 2120 .460* EBR 0 WBL 1 1600 60 .038* 110 .069* WBT 4 6400 1770 .277 2890 .452 WBR f 740 1530 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .872 .810 28. Bayside & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2.5 470 550 NBT 4800 20 .104* 20 .123* NBR 0.5 10 SBL 1.5 50 160 SBT 0.5 3200 20 .022* 30 .059* SBR 1 1600 60 .038 140 .088 EBL 1 1600 110 .'069 150 .094* EBT 3 4800 3150 .656* 2460 .513 EBR 1 1600 560 .350 700 .438 yJBL 1 1600 50 .031* 20 .013 WBT 4 6400 1970 308 3900 .609* WBR 1 1600 110 .069 140 .088 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .813. .885 29. MacArthur & Jamboree Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 180 .056 200 .063* NBT 4 6400 1960 .306* 840 .131 NBR 1 1600 570 .356 540 .338 SBL 2 3200 120 .038* 260 .081 4800 .108 1670 .348* SBR f 120 460 EBL 2 3200 600 .188* 230 .072 EBT 4 6400 1910 .298 1400 .219* EBR f 130 50 WBL 3 4800 380 .079 930 .194* 4800 960 .200* 1590 .331 WBR f Right Turn Adjustment NBR .050* NBR .008* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 30. Jamboree & Bristol (N) Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 1220 .381 1040 .325* 4800 3420 .713* 2540 .529 NBR 0 SBT SBL 2.5 6400 690 .197 1470 .364* SBR 1.5 570 860 EBL 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION /ls .00y VI-7 31. Bayview Place & Bristol (S) Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBR 2 3200 80 .025 360 .113 SBT 0 0 0 0 SBR EBT 4 6400 3730 583* 3310 .517* EBR 1 1600 120 .075 10 .006 0 0 WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .025* NBR .113* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 32. Jamboree & Bristol (S) .608 .630 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C 800 0 23 0 .295* 260 0NBR .339* 0 5 SBR 4800 660 .138 1490 .310 0 EBL 2.5 2170 .452* 980 .306 EBT 1.5 6400 600 .375 1500 .469* EBR 2 3200 1050 .328 1180 .369 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .747 .808 no I 33. Jamboree & Bayview Way Subarea Minimum With Improvements LANES CAPACITY 6400 NBT 4 NBR 0 0 6400 SBT 4 SBR 1 1600 1600 EBT 1 EBR 1 1600 1600 WBR 1 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 150 .094 70 .044 21880 .355* 24980 .402* 100 .063* 140 .088* 1460 .228 2470 .386 170 .106 80 .050 10 10 .006 .006* 40 .025 180 .113 50 .031 130 .081 Multi .044* Multi .179* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 34. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Univ. .481 /Ub Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 NBT 3 4800 1650 .344* 1990 .415* NBR 1 1600 210 .131 300 .188 SBT 3 4800 1160 .242* 1970 .410* SBR 1 1600 280 .175 370 .231 EBL 1.5 510 210 EBT 0.5 3200 120 .197* 100 .097* EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 1.5 280 .088* 200 1.5 4800 300 .063 420 .067* WBR Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION V19 657 LIM 35. Jamboree & Bison Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK'HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 3 4800 1630 .340* 1950 .406* NBR d 1600 330 .206 180 .113 SBL 2 3200 90 .028* 160 .050* SBT 3 4800 1370 .285 1750 .365 SBR 1 1600 50 .031 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 110 .069* 40 .025* EB 0 R 1 1600 80 .050 10 .006 WBL 2 3200 230 .072* 360 .113* WBR 2 3200 220 .069 190 .059 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 36. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Ford .509 .594 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 380 .119* 390 .122* NBT 3 4800 1750 .415 2050 .506 NBR 0 0 240 380 SBL 2 3200 60 .019 60 .019 SBT 3 4800 1710 .356* 2130 .444* SBR 1 1600 60 .038 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 170 .106 50 .031 EBT 1 1600 210 .131* 120 .075* EBR f 420 350 WBL 1.5 370 290 WBT 1.5 4800 510 .183* 150 .092* WBR 1 1600 80 .050 30 .019 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .789' .733 11 37. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C 'NBL 1 1600 30 .019 80 .050 NBT 3 4800 1460 .304* 2010 .419* NBR f 160 150 SBL 2 3200 590 .184* 470 .147* SBT 3 4800 1710 .356 2340 .488 SBR 1 1600 40 .025 200 .125 EBL 1.5 280 .088* 90 .028* EBT 1.5 4800 50 .031 30 .019 EBR 1 1600 50 .031 40 .025 WBL 2 3200 90 .028* 260 .081* WBT 1600 .006 .031 WBR f 420 650 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 38. Jamboree & Santa Barbara 604 675 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 3 4800 1720 .358* 1880 .392* NBR 1 1600 210 .131 110 .069 SBL 2 3200 480 .150* 320 .100* SBT 3 4800 1270 .265 2020 .421 SBR 1 1600 10 .006 30 .019 EBL 1 1600 60 .038* 20 .013 EBR 1600 30 .025 20 .019* 0 WBL 1.5 100 550 WBT 0.5 3200 10 .034* 10 .175* WBR 1 1600 60 .038 430 .269 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .004* WBR .094* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Vv f 39. Jamboree & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 30 .019 NBT 2 3200 640 .238* 360 .141* NBR 0 0 120 90 SBL 1 1600 200 .125* 200 .125* SBT 2 3200 280 .088 760 .238 SBR f 930 2210 EBL 3 4800 1360 .283* 920 .192* 6400 2210 .350 1770 .284 EBR 0 50 WBL 2 3200 130 .041 310 .097 6400 1440 .225* 26000 .406*160 WBR f TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 40. Santa Cruz & San Joaquin H. 871 .864 Subarea Minimum With Improvements HV/C HV/C LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 2 3200 100 .031 360 .113 NBT 1 1600 10 .025* 10 .175* NBR 0 0 30 270 SBL 1 1600 20 .013* 10 .006* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR 1 1600 70 .044 60 .038 EBL 1 1600 60 .038 100 .063* EBT 3 4800 450 .138* 390 .119 EBR 0 0 210 180 WBL 1 1600 270 .169* 40 .025 WBT 3 4800 330 .075 520 .115* WBR 0 0 30 30 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .037* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .382 .359 41. Santa Rosa & San Joaquin H. Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 170 .106* NBT 1 1600 10 .006* 20 .013 NBR 1 1600 200 .125 680 .425 SBL 1 1600 120 .075* 110 .069 SBT 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006* SBR 1 1600 '20 .013 50 .031 EBL 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 4800 3180 .081* 650 .158* EBR 0 11 WBL 2 3200 730 .228* 490 .153* 4800 570 .142 2590 .071 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .254* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 42. Newport Center & Coast Hw. 390 677 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C 0 0 0 NBT 0 NBR 0 0 0 0 3200 30 .009* 310 .097* SBT 0 SBR f 90 810 EBL 2 3200 610 .191* 330 .103* EBT 3 4800 1900 .396 1770 .369 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBT 3 4800 1450 .302* 2030 .423* WBR f 210 150 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION V2.3 502 bZ3 44. Avocado & San Miguel Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 130 .081 70 .044* NBT 1 1600 200 .125* 50 .031 NBR 1 1600 90 .056 630 .394 SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 240 .150 SBT 1 1600 70 .044 250 .156* SBR 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 3200 120 .041 680 .247* EBR 0 WBL 2 3200 530 .166 350 .109* WBT 2 3200 500 .231* 620 .219 WBR 0 0 240 80 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .235* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 45. Avocado & Coast Hw. .393 791 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 120 .075* 150 .094* NBT 1 1600 50 .031 100 .063 NBR 1 1600 270 .169 150 .094 SBL 1.5 80 350 SBT 0.5 3200 70 .047* 140 .153* SBR 1 1600 40 .025 340 .213 EBL 1 1600 360 .225* 180 .113 EBT 3 4800 1540 .321 1830 .381* EBR d 1600 70 .044 80 .050 WBL 1 1600 150 .094 220 .138* WBT 3 4800 1700 .354* 1740 .363 WBR 1 1600 130 .081 60 .038 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .094* SBR .060* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION vzq 795 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Subarea Minimum With Improvements. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 230 {.119}* 260 .081* NBT 0 4800 0 .119 0 NBR 1.5 340 90 .056 SBT 0 0 0 0 SBR EBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006* EBT 2 3200 1130 .353* 550 .172 EBR WBT 2 3200 110 .034 640 .200* WBR 1 1600 190 .119 760 .475 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .275* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison .472 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 0 0 0 0 NBR SBL 2 3200 840 .263* 280 .088* 0 SBR f 10 70 EBT 2 3200 300 .094* 240 .075 EBR 1 1600 160 .100 130 .081 WBL 2 3200 60 .019* 280 .088 WBT 2 3200 290 .091 640 .200* WBR Right Turn Adjustment EBR .006* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION V25 382 .zaa 48. MacArthur & Bison Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 350 .109 280 .088* NBT 4 6400 3460 .541* 2750 .430 NBR f 200 130 SBL 2 3200 110 .034* 40 .013 SBT 4 6400 2630 .411 3230 .505* SBR 1 1600 330 .206 440 .275 EBL 2 3200 300 .094* 290 .091* EBT 2 3200 350 .109 180 .056 EBR f 270 210 WBL 2 3200 180 .056 220 .069 WBT 2 3200 370 .116* 410 .128* WBR 1 1600 130 .081 60 .038 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 49. MacArthur & Ford/Bonita Cyn 785 .812 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 .044* 80 .025 6400 2020 .316 2470 .386* NBR f SBL 3 4800 600 .125 1350 .281* SBT 6400 2800 .438* 25610 0 .391 SBR f EBL 2 3200 40 .013* 10 .003 EBT 3 4800 390 .081 580 .121* EBR 1 1600 80 .050 120 .075 WBL 2 3200 490 .153 240 .075* WBT 2 3200 750 .234* 420 .131 WBR f 1650 780 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION VW0 .729 .863 F 50. MacArthur & San Joaquin H. Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 70 .022 30 .009 NBT 4 6400 1560 .244* 1850 .289* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 20 .013 SBL 2 3200 550 .172* 750 .234* SBT 3 4800 1620 .338 1960 .408 SBR f 1200 550 EBL 3 4800 260 .054* 1030 .215* EBT 3 4800 320 .075 800 .188 EBR 0 0 40 100 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 3200 860 .228* 340 .116* WBR f TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 51. MacArthur & San Miguel .`: 854 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 160 .050 190 .059* NBT 3 4800 1530 .319* 960 .200 NBR 1 1600 310 .194 450 .281 SBL 2 3200 10 .003* 10 .003 SBT 3 4800 980 .204 1520 .317* SBR 1 1600 720 .450 550 .344 EBL 47- 4800 80 -637XTIS' 940 .4-94 .2k EBT 2 3200 110 .053* 500 .203W EBR 0 0 60 150 WBL 2 3200 340 .106* 310 .097X WBT 2 3200 350 .109 300 .094'v WBR d 1600 20 .013 40 .025 15 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .mil* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION -w .-&7t V17 4C 11 52. MacArthur & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 0 0 NBT NBR 0 0 0 0 SBL 2 3200 530 .166* 830 .259* 0 SBR f 410 820 EBL 2 3200 840 .263* 660 .206* EBT 3 4800 1010 .210 1560 .325 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBT 3 4800 1440 .300* 1580 .329* WBR f 870 640 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 53. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bonita Cyn .729 .794 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 590 .184* 90 .028* NBR 11 1600 380 .238 130 .081 SBL 0 0 0 0 SBT SBR 0 0 0 0 EBT 2 3200 890 .278* 1090 .341* EBR 1 1600 90 .056 10 .006 WBL 2 3200 550 .172* 340 .106* 3200 1050 .328 1130 .353 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .054* NBR .053* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .688 .528 VIN I 54. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Cyn Subarea Minimum With Improvements LANES CAPACITY NBL 2 3200 NBT 0 0 NBR 1 1600 SBL 0 0 SBT 0 0 SBR 0 0 1600 EBR 1 4800 WBT 3 WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 40 .013* 280 .088* 0 0 240 .150 270 .169 0 0 0 0 0 0 710 .222 810 .253* 190 .119 570 .356 190 .059 210 .066* 1470 .306* 1010 .210 NBR .137* Multi .184* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 55. Spyglass Hill & San Miguel 456 5yl Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 40 30 {.0191* NBT 1 1600 40 .050* 20 .031 NBR d 1600 160 .100 180 .113 SBL 0 0 50 {.0311* 20 SBT 1 1600 30 .050 30 .031* SBR 1 1600 40 .025 30 .019 EBL 1 1600 50 .031* 70 .044 EBT 2 3200 340 .106 540 .169* EBR d 1600 30 .019 50 .031 WBL 1 1600 100 .063 140 .088* WBT 2 3200 450 .141* 470 .147 WBR d 1600 30 .019 40 .025 Right Turn Adjustment NBR' .050* NBR .075* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION W .303 Jdz 56. San'Miguel & San Joaquin H. Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL VIC VOL VIC NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 2 3200 260 .122* 550 .288* NBR 0 0 130 370 SBL 1 1600 70 .044* 150 .094* SBT 2 3200 460 .144 350 .109 SBR 1 1600 460 .288 160 .100 EBL 2 3200 300 .094* 530 .166* EBT 3 4800 580 .123 860 .181 EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 2 3200 450 .141 260 .081 4800 11590 .258* 5860 .133* WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .034* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 57. Goldenrod & Coast Hw. .552 .681 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL VIC VOL VIC NBL 1 1600 130 .081* 60 .038* 1600 30 .025 30 .025 NBR 0 1600 .088* 20 .038* SBR 0 60 EBL 1 1600 20 .013* 30 .019 EBT 2 3200 1210 .378 2090 .653* EBR d 1600 30 .019 70 .044 WBL 1 1600 40 .025 30 .019* WBT 3 4800 2810 .588* 1810 .379 WBR 0 0 10 10 Note: Assumes NIS Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION V30 770 748 II 11 58. Marguerite & San Joaquin H. Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 260 170 NBR 0.5 038* 1 1600 3200 0 .019* 60 .60 SBL 1 1600 60 .038 80 .050 1600 30 .044* 40 .056* SBR 1 EBL 1 1600 20 .013* 40 .025 EBT 2 3200 420 .131 970 .303* EBR 1 1600 110 .069 320 .200 WBL 1 1600 30 .019 110 .069* WBT 3 4800 1080 .225* 650 .135 WBR d 1600 90 .056 50 .031 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 59. Marguerite & Coast Hw. 379 buu Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 150 .094* 170 .106* NBT 1 1600 100 .106 120 .131 NBR 0 0 70 90 SBL 1 1600 60 .038 110 .069 SBT 1600 .100* 120 .119* SBR 0 160 EBL 1 1600 80 .050* 100 .063* EBT 3 4800 13550 .294 2000 .440 EBR WBL 1 1600 50 .031 110 .069 WBT 2 3200 2050 .647* 1590 .509* WBR 0 0 20 40 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 0 .891 /9/ I 60. Spyglass H. & San Joaquin H. Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 NBT 1 1600 0 .013* 10 .025* NBR 0 0 20 30 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 40 .025* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR d 1600 270 .169 140 .088 EBL 1 1600 70 .044* 240 .150* EBT 2 3200 630 .197 1000 .313 EBR 1 1600 20 .013 60 .038 WBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 2 3200 1100 .344* 620 .194* WBR d 1600 70 .044 70 .044 Right Turn Adjustment SBR 156* SBR .069* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 61. Poppy & Coast Hw. .595 .463 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 NBT 1 1600 10 .019 10 .038* NBR 0 0 20 50 SBL 0 0 50 120 {.075}* SBT 1 1600 10 .044* 10 .088 SBR 0 0 10 10 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* -20 .013 EBT 2 3200 1380 .434 1980 .622* EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013* WBT 2 3200 1940 .613* 1680 .531 WBR 0 0 20 20 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION viz .669 .748 62. Newport Coast & SR-73 NB Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 2 3200 1270 .397* 800 .250 NBR f 530 250 SBT 2 3200 430 .134 970 .303* SBR 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 WBL 1.5 310 270 WBT 0 3200 0 .134* 0 .100* WBR 0.5 120 50 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 64. Newport Coast & San Joaquin 531 403 Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 140 .044 140 .044* 4800 1500 .313* 710 .148 NBR 0 SBT 3 4800 760 .158 1110 .231* SBR .1 1600 130 .081 380 .238 EBL 1 1600 510 .319* 310 .194* EBR 2 3200 90 .028 110 .034 0 WBR 0 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .007* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION V33 .632 .476 65. Newport Coast & Coast Hw. Subarea Minimum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBL 2 3200 290 .091* 790 .247* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR f 200 230 EBL 1 1600 260 .163* 140 .088* EBT 3 4800 960 .200 1650 .344 EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 3 4800 1460 .304* 1260 .263* WBR f 760 330 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION v34 .564 .604 1 Study Area Land Use By NBTM Taz Analysis Year. 2040 Runid: SAmax1 Land Use: SAmax1 Network., bo06 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 10:30:00 AM Modeler. Marlle Whiteman M3TM TAZ land Use Coda Units Description Quantity 1373 10 TSF General Commercial 36.460 1373 23 TSF General Office 85.073 1373 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1373 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1373 26 TSF Industrial 0.000 1374 10 TSF General Commercial 42.231 1374 23 TSF General Office 84.463 1374 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1374 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1374 26 TSF Industrial 0.000 1375 10 TSF General Commercial 61.518 1375 13 TSF Restaurant 0.006 1375 23 TSF General Office 123.035 1375 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1375 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1375 26 TSF Industrial 0.000 1376 10 TSF General Commercial 67.464 1376 23 TSF General Office 134.927 1376 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1376 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1376 26 TSF Industrial 0.000 1377 10 TSF General Commercial 74.583 1377 23 TSF General Office 213.098 1377 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1377 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1377 26 TSF Industrial 0.000 1378 10 TSF General Commercial 85.378 1378 23 TSF General Office 243.936 1378 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1378 25 TSF R & D 0.000 1378 26 TSF Industrial 0.000 1379 23 TSF General Office 370.446 1380 23 TSF General Office 168.054 1381 23 TSF General Office 235.001 1382 3 Du Apartment 1,083.000 1383 23 TSF General Office 210.330 1384 10 TSF General Commercial 0.000 Friday, April 15. 2005 I i'3 Page 1 of 15 Analysis Year. 2040 Runld: SAmax1 Land Use: SAmax1 Network: bo06 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4115/2005 Build 77me: 10:30:00 AM Modeler. Marlia Whiteman NTMTAI landOee Code Okla OeeoMpU QeantltY 13114 23 TSF General Office 153.767 1385 3 DU Apartment 60.000 1385 7 ROOM Hotel 349.000 1386 23 TSF General Office 164.066 1387 23 TSF General Office 184.320 1388 10 TSF General Commercial 120.596 1388 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1389 3 OU Apartment 178.000 1389 10 TSF General Commercial 24.287 1389 23 TSF General Office 231.304 1390 23 TSF General Office 167.924 1391 23 TSF General Office 111.731 1392 10 TSF General Commercial 19.324 1392 23 TSF General Office 156.435 1393 10 TSF General Commercial 63.118 1393 23 TSF General Office 144.271 1395 7 ROOM Hotel 154.000 1395 10 TSF General Commerdal 20,190 1395 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1396 23 TSF General Office 691.600 1397 23 TSF General Office 165.040 1398 3 DU Apartment 530.000 1398 10 TSF General Commercial 127.217 1399 3 DU Apartment 530.000 1400 3 DU Apartment 312,000 1461 24 TSF Medical Office 86,096 1402 23 TSF General Office 45.794 1403 7 ROOM Hotel 471.000 1403 10 TSF General Commercial 46.800 1403 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1403 23 TSF General Office 432,355 1403 37 TSF Youth OtrlService 10.900 1404 3 DU Apartment 362.000 1404 23 TSF General Office 434.953 1405 3 DU Apartment 724.000 1405 10 TSF General Commercial 128.610 1405 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1405 23 TSF General Office 695.167 1406 3 DU Apartment 2,056.000 1406 26 TSF Industrial 0.000 Friday, April 15, 2005 ` f q Page 2 of 15 Analysis Year. Runid: Land Use: Network., 2040 SAmax1 SAmaxl bo06 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 10:30:00 AM Modeler. Marlie Whiteman ETMTAZ Land Use Code Unh Description Quantity 1407 10 TSF General Commercial 31.720 1407 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 1.560 1407 23 TSF General Office 124.990 1407 24 TSF Medical Office 3.770 1408 1 DU Res -Law (SFD) 145.000 1409 7 ROOM Hotel 300.000 1409 10 TSF General Commercial 35.000 1409 13 TSF Restaurant 8.000 1409 23 TSF General Office 660.000 1409 38 ACRE Park 3.330 1410 2 DU Res -Medium (SPA) 88.000 1411 10 TSF General Commercial 1.380 1411 40 ACRE Golf Course 15.690 1412 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 60.000 1413 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 33.000 1413 18 TSF Health Club 60.330 1413 23 TSF General Office 67.950 1413 39 ACRE Regional Park 45.910 1415 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 153.000 1415 36 TSF Church 8.730 1416 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 198.000 1417 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 56.000 1418 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 59.000 1419 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 173.000 1420 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 465.000 1421 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 116.000 1421 2 DU Res -Medium (SPA) 60.000 1421 3 DU Apartment 352.000 1421 10 TSF General Commercial 174.800 1421 13 TSF Restaurant 4.370 1421 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 3.000 1421 23 TSF General Office 214.660 1421 24 TSF Medical Office 43.220 1421 29 STU Elementary/Private School 636.000 1421 32 TSF Library 5.240 1422 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 490.000 1423 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 266.000 1423 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 18.230 1423 38 ACRE Park 4.000 1424 3 DU Apartment 1,445.000 Friday, April 15, 2005 W5 Page 3 of 15 Analysis Year. 2040 Runld: SAmaxl Land Use: SAmaxl Network be06 Reference Number., 01232 Build Date: 4/1512005 Build Time: 10:30:00 AM Modeler. Marlie Whiteman WTM 1AZ land UN Code NO DeeeMpum 4uenuty 1425 10 TSF General Commerdal 1.730 1425 23 TSF General Office 128.810 1425 36 TSF Church 24.100 1426 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 119,000 1426 36 TSF Church 40.000 1427 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 550.000 1427 3 DU Apartment 389.000 1427 10 TSF General Commercial 97.228 1427 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1427 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 0.000 1427 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1427 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1427 30 STU Junlor/High School 2,184.000 1427 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 68.000 1427 36 TSF Church 59.680 1427 37 TSF Youth Cir/Service 13.370 1427 38 ACRE Park 0.400 1428 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 257.000 1428 3 DU Apartment 152.000 1428 7 ROOM Hotel 140.000 1428 10 TSF General Commercial 332.520 1428 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1428 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1428 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 0.000 1428 19 CRT Tennis Club 0.000 1428 20 SLIP Marina 130.000 1428 23 TSF General Office 75,090 1428 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1428 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 22.310 1429 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 656.000 1429 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 13.000 1429 3 DU Apartment 59.000 1429 21 SEAT Theater 90.000 1429 29 STU Elementary/Pdvate School 436.000 1429 37 TSF Youth CU/Service 0.900 1429 38 ACRE Park 3.030 1430 1 OU Res -Low (SFD) 30.000 1430 3 DU Apartment 154.000 1430 7 ROOM Hotel 64.000 1430 10 TSF General Commercial 333.972 Fdday, Apol 15, 2005 W16 Page 4 of 15 Analysis Year: Runld: Land Use: Network., 2040 SAmax1 SAmax1 bo06 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 10:30:00 AM Modeler: Marlie Whiteman NBTMTAZ Lind Uss Code Untts 0esetipbon 4esnttty 1430 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1430 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1430 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 0.000 1430 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1430 23 TSF General Office 220.911 1430 33 TSF Post Office 0.000 1431 3 DU Apartment 122.000 1431 10 TSF General Commercial 152.392 1431 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1431 17 TSF Yacht Club 0.000 1431 23 TSF General Office 67.556 1432 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 200.000 1432 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 379.000 1432 3 DU Apartment 297.000 1432 6 ROOM Motel 0.000 1432 7 ROOM Hotel 53.000 1432 10 TSF General Commercial 169.786 1432 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1432 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1432 24, TSF Medical Office 169.231 1433 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 98.000 1433 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1433 3 DU Apartment 142.000 1433 23 TSF General Office 67.160 1433 24 TSF Medical Office 352.249 1433 26 TSF Industrial 0.000 1433 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 270.000 1434 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1434 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 7.770 1434 34 BED Hospital 822.000 1435 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 68.000 1435 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 28.000 1435 10 TSF General Commercial 10.800 1435 13 TSF Restaurant 8.400 1435 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 2.700 1436 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1436 3 DU Apartment 1,352.000 1436 4 DU Elderly Residential 0.000 1436 10 TSF General Commercial 24.801 1436 24 TSF Medical Office 85.203 April 15, 2005 ,W7 Page 5 of 15 Analysts Yeah 2040 Runld: SAmax1 Land Use: SAmaxl Network boos Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build 77me: 10:30:00 AM ' Modeler. Marne Whiteman NTMTAZ W)dUn Coda M 081CHPUM 4uEl" 1436 26 TSF Industrial 48.002 1436 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 169.000 1436 38 ACRE Park 0.170 1437 26 TSF Industrial 5.000 1438 3 DU Apartment 138.000 1438 26 TSF Industrial 3.610 1438 27 TSF MlniSlorageMarehouse 0.000 1438 29 STU Elementary/Pdvale School 622.000 1439 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1439 3 DU Apartment 613.000 1439 5 DU Mobile Home 0.000 1439 10 TSF General Commercial 78.460 1439 23 TSF General Office 239.510 1439 24 TSF Medical Office 219.056 1439 25 TSF R&,D 0.000 1439 26 TSF Industrial 837.270 1439 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 59.000 1440 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 281.000 1441 1 OU Res -Low (SFD) 462.000 1441 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1441 3 DU Apartment 604.000 1441 6 ROOM Motel 0.000 1441 10 TSF General Commercial 78.212 1441 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1441 15 TSr Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1442 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 43.000 1442 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 214.000 1442 38 ACRE Park 6.790 1443 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 125.000 1443 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 350,000 1443 3 DU Apartment 54.000 1443 38 ACRE Park 6.500 1444 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 94.000 1444 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 498.500 1445 1, DU Res-Low(SFD) 139.000 1445 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 509,000 1446 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 124.000 1446 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 239.000 1446 38 ACRE Park 2.690 1447 1 DU Rea-Low(SFD) 88.000 iI 1 I 1 I 1 I Friday, April 15, 2005 `- 5C Page 6 of 15 11 Analysis Year: Runld., Land Use: Network: 2040 SAmax1 SAmax1 bo06 Reference -Number., 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build rime: 10:30:00 AM Modeler: Marlie Whiteman NTM TAZ Land Use We Units 0escr Om quantity 1447 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 415.000 1448 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 87.000 1448 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 103.000 1448 10 TSF General Commercal 26.170 1448 13 TSF Restaurant 2.240 1448 23 TSF General Office 12.190 1448 24 TSF Medical Office 0.990 1449 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 95.000 1449 3 DU Apartment 192.000 1449 10 TSF General Commercial 86.445 1449 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0,000 1449 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1450 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 159.000 1450 3 DU Apartment 134.000 1450 6 ROOM Motel 16.000 1450 7 ROOM Hotel 74.000 1450 10 TSF General Commercial 81.790 1450 23 TSF General Office 103.185 1451 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 22.000 1451 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 110.000 1451 3 DU Apartment 5.000 1451 6 ROOM Motel 3.000 1451 7 ROOM Hotel 183.000 1451 10 TSF General Commercial 93.218 1451 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1451 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1451 37 TSF Youth Clr/Service 6.000 1452 3 DU Apartment 250.000 1452 7 ROOM Hotel 200.000 1452 10 TSF General Commercial 168.479 1452 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1452 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1452 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 6.000 1453 3 DU Apartment 61.000 1453 10 TSF General Commercial 152.961 1453 21 SEAT Theater 685.000 1453 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1453 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1453 36 TSF Church 0.000 1454 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 0.000 Friday, April 15, 2005 ` iI Page 7 of 15 Analysis Year: 2040 Runld: SAmaxi Land Use., SAmaxt Network: bo06 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build 77rde: 10:30:00 AM Modeler. Marlie Whiteman N81MTAZ LandUde Code NO UeeeMpum QUM" 1454 3 DU Apartment, 414.000 1454 10 TSF General Commercial 239.489 1454 11 ACRE Comm./Recrea0on 0.850 1464 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1454 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1464 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1454 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 4.650 1455 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 3.000 1455 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 403.000 1455 10 TSF General Commercial 108,220 1455 13 TSF Restaurant 9.200 1455 23 TSF General Office 1.000 1455 26 TSF Industrial 38.000 1456 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 1,040.000 1456 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 102,000 1456 3 DU Apartment 26.000 1457 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 218.000 1457 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 476.000 1457 3 DU Apartment 103.000 1457 5 DU Moblie Home 58.000 1457 6 ROOM Motel 26,OD0 1457 10 TSF General Commercial 12.540 1457 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 1.250 1457 20 SLIP Madna 58.000 1457 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 13.440 1457 29 STU Elementary/Pdvale School 389.000 1457 36 TSF Church 10.050 1467 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 17AOO 1457 38 ACRE Park 1.200 1458 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 351.000 1458 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 684.000 1458 3 DU Apartment 338.000 1458 10 TSF General Commercial 106.526 1458 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1458 20 SLIP Marine 14.000 1458 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1458 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1458 32 TSF Library 4.800 1458 36 TSF Church 2.000 1459 1 DU Res -Law (SFD) 9.00D Friday, April 15, 2005 110 Page 8 of 15 J Analysis Year: Runld., Land Use: Network: 2040 SAmaxl SAmaxl bo06 Reference Number:01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 10:30:00 AM Modeler Marlie Whiteman WTMTAZ Land Use Code Udta Deselipmn Quant" 1459 2 OU Res -Medium (SFA) 131.000 1459 3 DU Apartment 322.ODD 1459 7 ROOM Hotel 0.000 1459 10 TSF General Commercial 149.661 1459 11 ACRE Comm./Recreation 4.250 1459 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1459 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1459 17 TSF Yacht Club 0.000 1459 21 SEAT Theater 350.000 1459 23 TSF General Office 0.000 1459 33 TSF Post Office 1.700 1459 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 4.970 1460 1 OU Res -Low (SFD) 677.000 1460 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 194.000 1460 3 DU Apartment 51.000 1460 19 CRT Tennis Club 2.000 1460 38 ACRE Park 0.830 1461 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 214.000 1461 2 DU Res -Medium (SPA) 263.000 1461 10 TSF General Commercial 4.990 1461 13 TSF Restaurant 20.000 1461 17 TSF Yacht Club 8.290 1461 20 SLIP Marina 352.000 1461 23 TSF General Office 12,000 1461 26 TSF Industrial 5.040 1461 38 ACRE Park 0.780 1462 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 32.000 1463 3 DU Apartment 520.000 1463 10 TSF General Commercial 112.450 1463 13 TSF Restaurant 21.550 1463 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 17A20 1464 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 43.000 1464 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 3,119.000 1464 6 ROOM Motel 4.000 1464 10 TSF General Commercial 73.070 1464 13 TSF Restaurant 16.550 1464 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 5.430 1464 23 TSF General Office 18.370 1464 24 TSF Medical Office 2.750 1464 33 TSF Post Office 1.900 1 Friday, April 15, 2005 `' I' Page 9 of 15 Analysis Year. 2040 Runld., SAmaX1 Land Use: SAmaxl Network: bo06 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 10:30:00 AM ' Modeler. Martin Whiteman NTM TAZ Ind go Code IMM k1cl ipum QeritY 1464 36 TSF Church 3.000 1464 38 ACRE Park 1.620 1465 5 DU Mobile Home 397.000 1465 10 TSF General Commercial 60.630 1465 13 TSF Restaurant 18.190 1465 20 SLIP Marina 218.000 1465 23 TSF General Office 30.310 1466 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 212.000 1466 7 ROOM Hotel 754.000 1466 13 TSF Restaurant 83.930 1466 19 CRT Tennis Club 16.000 1466 22 ACRE Newport Dunes 64.000 1466 23 TSF General Office 6.000 1466 37 TSF Youth CWService 2.690 1466 40 ACRE Golf Course 2.000 1467 3 DU Apartment 1,185.000 1468 29 STU Elementary/Private School 320.000 1469 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 792.000 1469 3 DU Apartment 225.000 1469 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 6A50 1469 29 STU Elementary/Private School 294.000 1469 30 STU Junior/High School 11601.000 1469 36 TSF Church 34.960 1469 37 TSF Youth CU/Service 34.970 1469 38 ACRE Park 8.000 1470 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 145.000 1470 10 TSF General Commercial 78.230 1470 19 CRT Tennis Club 19.000 1470 23 TSF General Office 11.660 1471 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 460.000 1471 38 ACRE Park 2.000 1472 16 TSF Auto DealerlSales 209.750 1473 3 DU Apartment 300.000 1474 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 1,666.000 1474 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 208,000 1474 3 DU Apartment 736.000 1474 10 TSF General Commercial 35.000 1474 13 TSF Restaurant 6,350 1474 38 ACRE Park 14.230 1475 25 TSF R & D 81.730 Friday, April 15, 2005 W I9- Page 10 of 15 I Analysis Year: 2040 Runld., SAmaxl Land Use., SAmaxl Network., bo06 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 10:30:OD AM Modeler. Marie Whiteman M N TAZ Land Use ON Units 0e313PIP on Quantity 1475 27 TSF Mini-Storage/Warehouse 196.420 1475 29 STU Elementary/Private School 52.000 1475 33 TSF Post Office 55.200 1475 36 TSF Church 100.280 1476 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 227.000 1477 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 500.000 1478 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 50.000 1479 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 101.000 1479 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 54.000 1480 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 144.000 1480 3 DU Apartment 80.000 1481 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 101.000 1481 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 182.000 1481 10 TSF General Commercial 2.300 1482 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 142.000 1482 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 43.000 1482 3 DU Apartment 73.000 1482 40 ACRE Golf Course 181.200 1483 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 21.000 1484 7 ROOM Hotel 425.000 1484 10 TSF General Commercial 21.700 1484 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1404 23 TSF General Office 1,064.061 1485 9 TSF Regional Commercial 1,559.000 1485 10 TSF General Commercial 0.000 1485 21 SEAT Theater 1,700.000 1486 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1486 3 DU Apartment 452.000 1486 10 TSF General Commercial 175.680 1486 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1486 16 TSF Auto Dealer/Sales 0.000 1486 23 TSF General Office 881.000 1486 31 TSF Cultural/Leaming Center 40.000 1487 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 69.000 1487 3 DU Apartment 597.000 1487 7 ROOM Hotel 1,088.000 1487 10 TSF General Commercial 7.500 1487 19 CRT Tennis Club 22.000 1487 23 TSF General Office 11.630 1487 31 TSF Cultural/Leaming Center 58.000 1 Friday, April 15, 2005 `- /' 3 Page 11 of 15 Analysts Year. 2040 Runid: SAmaxl Land Use: SAmaxl Network: b006 Reference Number 01232 Build Date: 4/1512005 Build Time: 10:30:00 AM Modeler. Madie Whiteman SIMTAZ Vndke Code Uh De>a:HOM Qnent" 1487 40 ACRE Golf Course 99.400 1488 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 122.000 1489 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 228.000 1489 10 TSF General Commercial 5.000 1490 23 TSF General Office 115.800 1491 3 DU Apartment 57.000 1491 23 TSF General Office 646.692 1491 24 TSF Medical Office 530.002 1492 10 TSF General Commercial 186.368 1492 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1492 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1492 21 SEAT Theater 2,150.000 1492 23 TSF General Office 442.110 1493 23 TSF General Office 409.510 1494 10 TSF General Commercial 105.000 1494 32 TSF Library 65.000 1495 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 416.000 1495 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 37.000 1495 10 TSF General Commercial 2.380 1495 17 TSF Yacht Club 62.020 1495 20 SLIP Marina 283.000 1495 23 TSF General Office 186.530 1495 38 ACRE Park 6.530 1496 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 73.000 1496 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 256.000 1496 3 DU Apartment 152.000 1496 29 STU Elementary/Private School 12.030 1497 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 143.000 1497 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 214.000 1497 3 DU Apartment 48.000 1498 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 234.000 1498 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1498 3 DU Apartment 70.000 149B 10 TSF General Commercial 60.426 1498 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1498 23 TSF General Office 23.697 1498 38 ACRE Park 3.600 1499 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 144.000 15D0 1 DU Res -Law (SFD) 176.000 1500 38 ACRE Park 1.030 Fdday, Apd115, 2005 Will Page 12 of 15 Analysis Year: 2040 Runld., SAmax1 Land Use: SAmax1 Network: bo06 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build rime: 10:30:00 AM Modeler. Marne Whiteman MIM iAZ land Use Code Units 0escriptlon Quantity 1501 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 849.000 1501 3 DU Apartment 48.000 1501 10 TSF General Commercial 121.519 1501 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1501 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1501 21 SEAT Theater 500.000 1501 23 TSF General Office 33.358 1501 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1501 38 ACRE Park 2.500 1502 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 186.000 1502 3 DU Apartment 45.000 1502 10 TSF General Commercial 113.965 1502 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1502 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1502 23 TSF General Office 31.285 1502 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1503 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 52.000 1503 3 DU Apartment 18.000 1503 10 TSF General Commercial 58.610 1503 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1503 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1503 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1503 23 TSF General Office 6.312 1503 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1504 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 542.000 1504 3 DU Apartment 25.000 1504 10 TSF General Commercial 81.828 1504 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1504 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1504 18 TSF Health Club 0.000 1504 23 TSF General Office 8.812 1504 24 TSF Medical Office 0.000 1504 36 TSF Church 12.340 1505 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 843.000 1505 3 DU Apartment 17.000 1505 10 TSF General Commercial 54.206 1505 13 TSF Restaurant 0.000 1505 15 TSF Fast Food Restaurant 0.000 1505 23 TSF General Office 21.257 1505 32 TSF Library 3.800 Friday, Apol 15, 2005 W iil� Page 13 of 15 Analysis Year. 2040 Reference Number., 01232 Runld., SAmaxl Build Date: 4/15/2005 Land Use., SAmax1 Build Tlme: 10:30:00 AM Network., bo06 Modeler Marile Whiteman WTM TAZ UM he Coda IN N GeesdpMn 4Ulntlty 1505 33 TSF Post Office 5.0OO 1506 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 363.000 1506 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 0.000 1506 3 DU Apartment 6.000 1506 10 TSF General Commercial 19.515 1506 23 TSF GeneralOffice4.879 1507 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 142.00D 1507 38 ACRE Park 0.780 1508 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 228,000 1508 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 120.000 1508 3 DU Apartment 120.000 1508 29 STU Elementary/Private School 790.000 1508 37 TSF Youth Ctr/SeMce 5.850 1510 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 200.000 1511 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 20.000 1511 10 TSF General Commercial 70.790 1512 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 246.000 1513 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 348.00D 1513 4 DU Elderly Residential 100.O00 1513 18 TSF Health Club 1.000 1513 37 TSF Youth Ctr/Service 24.070 1514 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 41.000 1515 3 DU Apartment 388.000 1515 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 8.400 1516 2 DU Res-Medlum (SFA) 67.000 1516 4 DU Elderly Residential 100.000 1516 36 TSF Church 88.670 1517 3 DU Apartment 160.000 1517 10 TSF General Commercial 71.080 1517 23 TSF General Office 9.750 1517 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 13.390 1517 29 STU ElementarylPdvate School 406.000 1517 30 STU Junior/High School 780.000 1517 36 TSF Church 31.380 1518 1 DU Res-Low(SFD) 441.000 1518 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 67.000 1518 38 ACRE Park 01950 1519 1 DU Res -Law (SFD) 475.000 1519 38 ACRE Park 14.230 1520 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 207.000 Friday, Apd115, 2005 VD Page 14 of 15 Analysis Year: Runld., Land Use: Network: 2040 SAmax1 SAmax1 bo06 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 10:30:00 AM Modeler., Marlie Whiteman M31M TAZ land Use Code Units 083011ptbn waliffltY 1521 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 580.000 1521 29 STU Elementary/Private School 498.000 1521 38 ACRE Park 9.730 1522 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 119.000 1522 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 120.000 1522 10 TSF General Commercial 96.540 1522 23 TSF General Office 12.900 1525 3 DU Apartment 1,100.000 1526 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 290.000 1527 2 DU Res -Medium (SFA) 125.000 1528 28 TSF Pre-school/Day Care 7.320 1528 36 TSF Church 26.010 1556 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 263.000 1556 38 ACRE Park 37.000 1558 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 350.000 1558 3 DU Apartment 445.000 1558 29 STU Elementary/Private School 500.000 1558 38 ACRE Park 20.000 1559 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 262.000 1559 3 DU Apartment 445.000 1559 7 ROOM Hotel 75.000 1559 10 TSF General Commercial 75.000 1559 38 ACRE Park 20.000 1618 1 DU Res -Low (SFD) 6.000 1713 34 BED Hospital 443.000 1714 3 DU Apartment 673.000 1715 10 TSF General Commercial 17.760 1715 24 TSF Medical Office 183.261 1716 24 TSF Medical Office 183.262 1716 35 BEDS Nursing/Conv. Home 95.000 1 1 ' Friday, April 15, 2005 ` f q Page 15 of 15 APPENDIX X SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT LAND USE CHANGE FROM CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BY TAZ 1 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU Code lQuantitv Occu ancyRate LU_Code Quantity Occupant Rate 1516 21 67 0.95 2 67 0.95 1516 41 100 1 4 100 1 1516 361 88.67 1 36 88.67 1 1517 31 160 0.95 3 160, 0.95 1517 101 71.08 0.9 10 71.08 0.9 1517 23 9.75 0.9 231 9.75 0.9 1517 28 13.39 1 28 13.39 1 1517 29 406 1 29 406 1 1517 30 780 1 30 780 1 1517 36 31.38 1 36 31.38 1 1518 1 441 0.95 1 441 0.95 1518 2 67 0.95 2 67 0.95 1518 38 0.95 1 38 0.95 1 1519 1 475 0.95 1 475 0.95 1519 381 14.23 1 38 14.23 1 1520 11 207 0.95 1 207 0.95 1521 11 580 0.95 1 580 0.95 1521 291 498 1 29 498 1 1521 381 9.73 1 38 9.73 1 1522 11 119 0.95 1 119 0.95 1522 21 120 0.95 2 120 0.95 1522 101 96.54 0.9 101 96.54 0.9 1522 231 12.9 0.9 23 12.9 0.9 1408 11 145 0.95 1 145 0.95 1409 71 300 0.9 7 300 0.9 1409 101 35 0.9 10 35 0.9 1409 131 8 0.9 13 8 0.9 1409 231 660 0.9 23 660 0.9 1409 381 3.33 1 38 3.33 1 1410 21 88 0.95 21 88 0.95 1411 101 1.38 0.9 10 1.38 0.9 1411 401 15.69 1 40 15.69 1 1412 11 60 0.95 1 60 0.95 1413 21 33 0.95 2 33 0.95 1413 181 60.33 1 18 60.33 1 1413 231 67.95 0.9 23 67.95 0.9 1413 391 45.91 1 39 45.91 1 1415 11 153 0.95 1 153 0.95 1415 361 8.73 1 36 8.73 1 1416 1 198 0.95 1 198 0.95 1417 11 56 0.95 1 56 0.95 1418 11 59 0.95 1 59 0.95 1419 1 173 0.95 1 173 0.95 1420 11 465 0.95 1 465 0.95 1421 1 116 0.95 1 116 0.95 1421 2 60 0.95 2 60 0.95 1421 3 352 0.95 3 352 0.95 1421 10 174.8 0.9 10 174.81 0.9 1421 13 4.37 0.9 13 4.37 0.9 1421 15 3 0.9 15 31 0.9 X3 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate 1421 23 214.66 0.9 23 214.66 0.9 1421 24 43.22 0.9 24 43.22 0.9 1421 29 636 1 29 636 1 1421 32 5.24 1 32 5.24 1 1422 1 490 0.95 1 490 0.95 1423 1 266 0.95 1 266 0.95 1423 371 18.23 1 371 18.23 1 1423 381 4 1 38 4 1 1424 31 1445 0.95 3 1445 0.95 1373 101 35.08 0.9 10 36.46 0.9 1373 231 78.13 0.9 23 85.073 0.9 1373 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1373 251 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1373 261 12.19 0.9 26 0 0.9 1374 101 35.08 0.9 101 42.231 0.9 1374 231 78.13 0.9 23 84.463 0.9 1374 241 0 0.9 24 10 0.9 1374 251 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1374 261 12.19 0.9 26 0 0.9 1375 101 54.46 0.9 10 61.518 0.9 1375 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1375 23 117.2 0.9 23 123.035 0.9 1375 24 0 0.9 241 0 0.9 1375 25 0 0.9 251 0 0.9 1375 26 18.29 0.9 26 0 0.9 1376 10 56.13 0.9 10 67.464 0.9 1376 23 125.01 0.9 23 134.927 0.9 1376 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1376 251 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1376 26 19.51 0.9 26 0 0.9 1377 10 80.68 0.9 10 74.583 0.9 1377 23 179.7 0.9 231 213.096 0.9 1377 24 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1377 25 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1377 26 28.05 0.9 26 0 0.9 1378 10 91.21 0.9 10 85.378 0.9 1378 231 203.14 0.9 23 243.936 0.9 1378 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1378 251 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1378 261 31.7 0.9 261 0 0.9 1425 101 1.73 0.9 10 1.73 0.9 1425 231 128.81 0.9 23 128.81 0.9 1425 361 24.1 1 36 24.1 1 1426 11 119 0.95 1 119 0.95 1426 361 40 1 36 40 1 1427 1 550 0.95 1 0 0.95 1427 2 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1427 10 21.391 0.9 10 152.392 0.9 1427 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1427 16 01 11 161 01 1 10 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU_Code Quantity OccupancyRate LU_Code Quantity Occupant Rate 1427 23 29.63 0.9 23 67.656 0.9 1427 24 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1427 30 2184 1 30 0 1 1427 35 68 1 35 0 1 1427 36 59.68 1 36 0 1 1427 37 13.37 1 37 0 1 1427 381 0.4 1 38 0 1 1428 11 257 0.95 1 550 0:95 1428 31 152 0.95 3 0 0.95 1428 71 140 • 0.9 7 0 0.9 1428 101 332.52 0.9 10 0 0.9 1428 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1428 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1428 16 0 1 16 0 1 1428 19 0 1 19 0 1 1428 20 0 1 20 0 1 1428 23 75,09 0.9 23 0 0.9 1428 24 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1428 37 22.31 1 37 13,37 1 1525 3 1100 0.95 3 1100 0.95 1526 11 290 0.95 1 290 0.95 1618 1 6 0.95 1 6 0.95 1527 2 125 0.95 2 125 0.95 1429 1 656 0.95 1 656 0.95 1429 2 13 0.95 2 13 0.95 1429 3 59 0.95 3 59 0.95 1429 21 90 1 21 90 1 1429 29 436 1 29 436 1 1429 37 0.9 1 37 0.9 1 1429 38 3.03 1 38 3.03 1 1528 28 7.32 1 28 7.32 1 1528 36 26.01 1 36 26.01 1 1430 1 30 0.95 1 30 0.95 1430 6 0 0.9 6 0 0.9 1430 7 64 0.9 7 64 0.9 1430 10 275.98 0.9 10 274.009 0.9 1430 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1430 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1430 16 0 1 16 0 1 1430 18 0 1 18 0 1 1430 23 283.82 0.9 23 220.911 0.9 1430 33 9.9 1 33 0 1 1431 3 36 0.95 3 154 0.95 1431 10 149.91 0.9 10 59.963 0.9 1431 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1431 17 0 1 17 0 1 1431 23 77.65 0.9 23 0 0.9 1432 1 205 0.95 1 200 0.95 1432 2 379 0.95 2 379 0.95 1432 3 8 6.95 3 297 0.95, CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU Code Quantit Occu anc Rate LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate 1432 6 0 0.9 6 0 0.9 1432 7 53 0.9 7 169.786 0.9 1432 10 66.38 0.9 10 169.786 0.9 1432 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1432 23 135.73 0.9 23 0 0.9 1432 24 11.29 0.9 24 169.231 0.9 1433 11 98 0.95 11 98 0.95 1433 21 0 0.95 21 0 0.95 1433 31 142 0.95 31 142 0.95 1433 231 67.16 0.9 23 •67,16 0.9 1433 241 24.46 0.9 241 352.249 0.9 1433 261 298.12 0.9 261 0 0.9 1433 351 270 1 35 270 1 1715 241 142.43 0.9 24 142.43 0.9 1714 31 673 0.95 3 673 0.95 1715 101 17.76 0.9 10 17.76 0.9 1434 231 9.66 0.9 23 9.66 0.9 1716 241 142.43 0.9 24 142.43 0.9 1434 281 7.77 1 28 7.77 1 1434 341 822 1 341 822 1 1716 351 95 1 35 95 1 1435 11 68 0.95 1 68 0,95 1436 21 28 0.95 2 28 0.95 1435 101 10.8 0.9 10 10.8 0.9 1435 131 8.4 0.9 13 8.4 0.9 1435 151 2.7 0.9 15 2.7 0.9 1379 231 349.64 0.9 23 370.446 0.9 1380 231 158.61 0.9 231 168.054 0.9 1381 231 221.8 0.9 23 235.001 0.9 1382 231 321.53 0.9 23 0 0.9 1383 231 210.33 0.9 23 210.33 0.9 1384 101 25.25 0.9 10 0 0.9 1384 231 67.02 0.9 23 153.767 0.9 1385 71 349 0.9 7 349 0.9 1386 231 228.21 0.9 23 164.066 0.9 1387 231 184.32 0.9 23 184.32 0.9 1388 101 106.11 0.9 10 120.596 0.9 1388 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1389 101 46.3 1 10 24.287 1 1389 231 201.78 0.9 23 231.304 0.9 1390 231 146.48 0.9 23 167.924 0.9 1391 231 97.42 0.9 23 111.731 0.9 1392 101 17.78 1 101 19.324 1 1392 231 160.59 0.9 231 156.435 0.9 1393 10 58.12 019 10 63.118 0.9 1436 2 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1436 3 1370 0.95 3 1352 0.95 1436 4 0 1 4 0 1 1436 10 3.5 0.9 10 24.801 0.9 1436 24 39.6 0.9 24 85.203 0.9 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU_Code lQuantity OccupancyRate LU_Code Quantity Occupancy Rate 1436 261 48.002 0:9 26 48.002 0.9 ' 1436 35 169 1 35 169 1 1436 38 0.17 1 38 0.17 1 1437 26 5 0.9 26 5 0.9 ' 1438 23 57.4 0.9 23 0 0.9 1438 261 8.33 0.9 26 3.61 0.9 1438 27 0 0.9 271 0 0.9 ' 1438 29 622 1 291 622 1 1439 2 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1439 3 464 0.95 3 513 0.95 1439 5 0 0.95 5 0 0.95 ' 1439 10 50.91 0.9 10 78.46 0.9 1439 23 239.51 0.9 23 239.51 0.9 1439 24 61.63 0.9 24 219.056 0.9 1439 25 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1439 26 837.27 0.9 261 837.27 0.9 1439 35 59 1 351 59 1 ' 1440 2 281 0.95 21 281 0.95 1441 1 462 0.95 11 462 0.95, 1441 2 0 0.95 21 0 0.95 ' 1441 3 293 0.95 31 604 0.95 1441 61 90 0.9 6 0 0.9 1441 101 50.03 0.9 101 78.212 0.9 1441 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 ' 1441 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1442 11 43 0.95 1 43 0.95 1442 2 214 0.95 2 214 0.95 1442 38 6.79 1 38 6.79 1 1443 1 125 0.95 1 125 0.95 1443 2 350 0.95 21 350 0.95 ' 1443 3 54 0.95 3 54 0.95 1443 38 6.5 1 38 6.5 1 1444 1 94 0.95 1 94 0.95 ' 1444 2 498.5 0.95 2 498.5 0.95 1445 1 i 139 0.9 1 139 0.9 1445 2 509 0.9 2 509 0.9 1446 1 124 0.95 1 124 0.95 1446 2 239 0.95 2 239 0.95 1446 38 2.69 1 38 2.69 1 1447 1 88 0.9 1 88 0.9 ' 1447 2 415 0.9 2 415 0.9 1448 1 87 0.9 1 87 0.9 1448 2 103 0.9 2 103 0.9 ' 1448 10 26.17 0.9, 10 26.17 0.9 1448 13 2.24 0.9 13 2.24 0.9 1448 23 12.19 0.9 23 12.19 0.9 1448 24 0.99 0.9 24 0.99 0.9 1449 2 95 0.9 2 95 0.9 1449 10 749 0.9 10 86.445 0.9 1449 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 ' CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM _ LU Code Quantity Occupanc Rate LU Code Quantity OccupancyRate 1449 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1449 23 20.02 0.9 23 0 0.9 1450 2 159 0.9 2 159 0.9 1450 3 3 0.9 3 134 0.9 1450 6 16 0.9 6 16 0.9 1450 10 67.59 0.9 10 81.79 0.9 1450 131 0 0.9 131 0 0.9 1450 231 35.75 0.9 23 103.185 0.9 1451 11 22 0.9 1 22 0.9 1451 21 110 0.9 2 110 0.9 1451 31 5 0.9 3 5 0.9 1451 61 3 0.9 6 3 0.9 1451 71 22 0.9 7 183 0.9 1451 101 82.75 0.9 10 93.218 0.9 1451 131 0 0.9 131 0 0.9 1451 151 0 0.9 151 0 0.9 1451 231 8 0.9 231 0 0.9 1452 21 12 0.9 2 102 0.9 1452 101 130.51 0.9 10 0 0.9 1452 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1452 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1452 231 90.22 0.9 23 0 0.9 1452 371 6 1 37 0 1 1453 i0l 111.58 0.9 10 152.961 0.9 1453 131 0 0.9 131 0 0.9 1453 211 685 1 21 685 1 1453 231 119.9 0.9 23 0 0.9 1453 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1453 361 26.01 1 36 0 1 1454 11 41 0.9 1 0 0.9 1454 21 172 0.9 2 0 0.9 1454 101 201.73 0.9 10 239489 0.9 1454 111 085 1 11 0.85 1 1454 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1454 151 0 0.9 15 0 0:9 1454 23 1015 0.9 23 U 0.9 1454 37 405 1 37 4,65 1 1455 1 3 019 1 3 0.9 1455 2 403 0.9 2 403 0.9 1455 10 108.22 0.9 10 108.22 0.9 1455 13 9.2 0.9 13 9.2 0.9 1455 23 1 0.9 23 1 0.9 1455 261 38 0.9 26 38 0.9 1456 11 1040 0.9 1 1040 0.9 1456 21 102 0.9 2 102 0.9 1456 3 26 019 3 26 0.9 1457 1' 218 0.9 1 218 0.9 1457 2 476 0.91 21 476 0.9 1457 3 103 0.91 31 103 0.9 1457 5 58 0.91 51 581 0.9 Em u 11 11 11 11 1 1 I CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU Code Quantity OccupancyRate LU_Code Quantity Occu ancyRate 1457 6 26 0.9 6 26 0.9 1457 10 12.54 0.9 10 12.54 0.9 1457 15 1.25 0.9 15 1.25 0.9 1457 20 58 1 20 58 1 1457 28 13.44 1 28 13.44 1 1457 29 389 1 29 389 1 1457 36 10.05 1 36 10.05 1 1457 37 17.4 1 37 17.4 1 1457 38 1.2 1 38 1.2 1 1458 1 366 0.9 1 0 0.9 1456 2 684 0.9 2 0 0.9 1458 31 173 0.9 3 0 0.9 1458 10 20.81 0.9 10 104.126 0.9 1458 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1458 20 14 1 20 0 1 1458 23 29.26 0.9 23 0 0.9 1458 24 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1458 32 4.8 1 32 0 1 1458 36 2 1 36 0 1 1395 71 164 0.9 71 154 0.9 1395 101 120 0.9 101 20.19 0.9 1395 13l 0 0.9 131 0 0.9 1396 231 591.6 0.9 231 591.6 0.9 1397 231 165.04 0.9 231 165.04 0.9 1459 11 9 0.9 11 351 0.9 1459 21 131 0.9 21 684 0.9 1459 3 69 0.9 31 173 0.9 1459 71 34 0.9 71 0 0.9 1459 101 196.53 0.9 101 2.4 0.9 1459 ill 4.25 1 11 0 1 1459 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1459 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1459 17 0 1 17 0 1 1459 21 350 1 21 0 1 1459 23 60 0.9 23 0 0.9 1459 33 1.7 1 33 0 1 1459 37 4.97 1 371 0 1 1460 1 677 0.9 1 677 0.9 1460 2 194 0.9 21 194 0.9 1460 3 51 0.9 3 51 0.9 1460 19 2 1 19 2 1 1460 38 0.83 1 38 0.83 1 1461 1 214 0.9 1 214 0.9 1461 2 263 0.9 21 263 0.9 1461 10 4.99 0.9 10 4.99 0.9 1461 13 20 0.9 13 20 0.9 1461 17 8.29 1 17 8.29 1 1461 20 3621 1 20 352 1 1461 23 121 0.9 23 12 0.9 1461 26 5.041 0.9 26 5.04 0.9 171 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU Code Quantity Occupant Rate LU Code Quantity OccupancyRate 1461 38 0.78 1 38 0.78 1 1462 1 32 0.9 1 32 0.9 1463 3 520 0.9 3 520 0.9 1463 10 112.45 0.9 10 112.45 0.9 1463 13 21.55 0.9 13 21.55 0.9 1463 161 17.42 1 16 17.42 1 1464 11 43 0.9 1 43 0.9 1464 21 3119 0.9 2 3119 0.9 1464 61 4 0.9 6 4 0.9 1464 101 73.07 0.9 10 73,07 0.9 1464 131 16.55 0.9 13 16,55 0.9 1464 151 5.43 0.9 15 5.43 0.9 1464 231 18.37 0.9 23 18.37 0.9 1464 241 2.75 0.9 24 2.75 0.9 1464 331 1.9 1 331 1.9 1 1464 361 3 1 36 3 1 1464 381 1.62 1 38 1.62 1 1465 51 397 0.95 5 397 0.95 1465 101 60.63 0.9 10 60.63 0.9 1465 1131 18.19 0.9 13 18.19 0.9 1465 201 218 1 20 218 1 1465 231 30.31 0.9 23 30.31 0.9 1466 21 212 0.95 21 212 0.95 1466 71 754 0.9 7 754 0,9 1466 131 83.93 0.9 13 83.93 0.9 1466 191 16 1 19 16 1 1466 221 64 1 22 64 1 1466 231 6 0.9 23 6 0.9 1466 37 2.69 1 37 2.69 1 1466 40 2 1 40 2 1 1467 3 1185 0.95 31 1185 0.95 1468 29 320 1 29 320 1 1469 2 792 0.95 2 792 0,95 1469 3 225 0.95 3 225 0.95 1469 28 6.45 1 28 6.45 1 1469 291 294 1 29 294 1 1469 301 1801 1 30 1801 1 1469 361 34.96 1 36 34.96 1 1469 371 34.97 1 37 34.97 1 1469 381 8 1 38 8 1 1470 21 145 0.95 2 145 0.95 1470 101 78.23 0.9 10 78.23 0.9 1470 191 19 1 19 19 1 1470 231 11.66 0.9 23 11.66 0.9 1398 23 82.583 0.9 23 0 0.9 1399 23 108.52 0.9 231 0 0.9 1400 23 62.08 0.9 23 0 0.9 1471 1 460 0.95 1 460 0.95 1471 38 2 1 38 2 1 1472 16 209.75 1 16 209.75 1 x1� CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU_Code Quantity OccupancyRate LU_Code Quantity OccupancyRate 1473 3 300 0.95 3 300 0.95 1474 1 1686 0.95 1 1686 0.95 1474 2 208 0.95 2 208 0.95 1474 3 736 0.95 3 736 0.95 1474 10 35 0.9 10 35 0.9 1474 13 6.35 0.9 13 6.35 0.9 1474 381 14.23 1 381 14.23 1 1475 25 81.73 0.9 25 81.73 0.9 1475 27 196.42 0.9 27 196.42 0.9 1475 29 52 1 29 52 1 1475 33 55.2 1 33 55.2 1 1475 36 100.28 1 36 100.28 1 1476 2 227 0.95 2 227 0.95 1477 1 500 0.95 1 500 0.,95 1478 21 50 0.95 2 50 0.95 1479 11 101 0.95 1 101 0.95 1479 21 54 0.95 21 54 0.95 1480 21 144 0.95 21 144 0.95 1480 31 80 0.95 31 80 0.95 1401 241 86.096 0.9 241 86.096 0.9 1402 231 45.794 0.9 231 45.794 0.9 1481 11 101 0.95 1 101 0.95 1481 21 182 0.95 2 182 0.95 1481 10 2.3 0.9 10 2.3 0.9 1482 1 142 0.95 1 142 0.95 1482 2 43 0.95 2 43 0.95 1482 3 73 0.95 3 _ . 73 0.95 1482 40 181.2 1 40 181.2 1 1483 1 21 0.95 1 21 0.95 1484 7 425 0.9 7 425 0.9 1484 10 21.7 0:9 10 21.7 0.9 1484 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1484 231 955.03 0.9 231 1064.061 0.9 1485 91 1633.84 0.8 91 1559 0.8 1485 101 0 0.9 101 0 0.9 1485 211 1700 1 21 1700 1 1486 21 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1486 31 245 0.95 3 452 0.95 1486 101 125.68 0.9 10 175.68 0.9 1486 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1486 16 0 1 16 0 1 1486 23 881 0.9 23 881 0.9 1486 31 40 1 31 40 1 1487 2 69 0.95 21 69 0.95 1487 7 611 0.9 7 1088 0.9 1487 10 7.5 0.9 10 7.5 0.9 1487 19 221 1 19 22 1 1487 231 11.631 0.9 23 11.63 0.9 1487 401 99.41 1 40 99.4 1 1488 21 1221 0.95 2 1221 0.95 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU Code Quantity Odcu anc Rate LU Code lQuantity Occupanc Rate 1489 2 228 0.95 21 228 0195 1489 10 5 019 101 5 0.9 1490 23 115.8 0.9 23 115.8 019 1403 7 471 0.9 7 471 0.9 1403 10 16 0.9 10 46.8 0.9 1403 18 0 1 18 0 1 1403 231 393.05 0.9 23 432.355 0.9 1403 371 10.9 0.9 37 10.9 0.9 1491 231 468.64 0.9 23 646.692 0.9 1491 241 351.95 0.9 241 530.002 0.9 1492 101 38.1 0.9 10 186.368 0:9 1492 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1492 181 0 1 18 0 1 1492 211 2150 1 21 2150 1 1492 231 442.11 0.9 23 442,11 0.9 1493 231 409.51 0.9 23 409.51 0.9 1494 10 105 0.9 101 105 0.9 1494 321 65 1 32 65 1 1495 11 416 0.9 1 416 0.9 1495 21 37 0.9 2 37 0.9 1495 10 2.38 0.9 10 2.38 0.9 1495 17 62.02 1 17 62.02 1 1495 20 283 1 20 283 1 1495 23 186.53 0.9 23 186.53 0.9 1495 38 6.53 1 38 6.53 1 1496 1 73 0.9 1 73 0.9 1496 2 256 0.9 2 256 0.9 1496 31 152 0.9 3 152 0.9 1496 291 12.03 1 29 12.03 1 1497 11 143 0.9 1 143 019 1497 21 214 0.9 2 214 0.9 1497 31 48 0.9 3 48 0.9 1498 11 234 0.9 1 234 0.9 1498 21 0 0.9 2 0 0.9 1498 31 48 0.9 3 48 0.9 1498 101 92.44 0.9 10 49.763 0.9 1498 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1498 231 23.98 0.9 23 23.697 0.9 1498 381 3.6 1 38 3.6 1 1499 1 144 0.9 1 0 0.9 1500 1 178 0.95 1 178 0.95 1500 38 1.03 1 381 1.03 1 1501' 1 849 0.9 1 0 0.9 1501 2 0 0.9 2 0 0.9 1501 10 106.84 019 10 0 0.9 1501 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1501 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1501 21 0 1 21 0 1 1501 23 36.05 0.9 23 0 0.9 1501 24 0 0.91-241 0 0.9 XI2 I CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU_Code Quantity Occu ancyRate LU_Code Quantity OccupancyRate 1501 38 2.5 1 38 0 1 1502 1 186 0.9 1 849 0.9 1502 2 0 0.9 2 0 0.9 1502 10 104.41 0.9 10 100.075 0.9 1502 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1502 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1502 231 33.09 0.9 23 33.358 0.9 1502 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1404 231 434.953 0.9 23 434,953 0.9 1405 10 129.3 0.9 10 128.61 0.9 1405 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1405 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1405 231 688.16 0.9 23 695.157 0.9 1406 251 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1406 261 430 0.9 26 0 0.9 1407 101 31.72 0.9 101 31.72 0.9 1407 151 1.56 0.9 151 1.56 0.9 1407 231 124.99 0.9 231 124.99 0.9 1407 241 3.77 0.9 241 3.77 0.9 1503 11 52 0.9 11 0 0.9 1503 21 0 0.9 21 0 0.9 1503 101 88.02 0.9 101 21.444 0.9 1503 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1503 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1503 181 0 1 18 0 1 1503 231 9.97 0.9 23 0 0.9 1503 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1504 11 542 0.95 1 186 0.95 1504 21 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1504 101 88.02 0.9 101 93.854 0.9 1504 131 0 0.9 131 0 0.9 1504 151 0 0.9 151 0 0.9 1504 181 0 1 18 0 1 1504 231 9.97 0.9 23 31.285 0.9 1504 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1504 361 12.34 1 36 0 1 1505 11 843 0.95 1 0 0.95 1505 21 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1505 101 58.9 0.9 10 20.111 0.9 1505 131 0 0.9 131 0 0.9 1505 151 0 0.9 151 0 0.9 1505 231 35 0.9 231 0 '0.9 1505 321 3.8 1 321 0 1 1505 33 5 1 331 0 1 1506 1 363 0.95 1 0 0.95 1506 2 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1506 3 6 0.95 3 0 0.95 1507 1 142 0.95 1 142 0.95 1507 38 0.78 1 38 0.78 1 1508 1 228 0.95 1 2281 0.95 `k13 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU Code Quantity Occupant Rate LU Code lQuentity Occu ant Rate 1508 2 120 0.95 2 120 0.95 1508 3 120 0.95 3 120 0.95 1508 29 790 1 29 790 1 1508 37 5.85 1 37 5.85 1 1510 1 200 0.95 1 200 0.95 1511 1 20 0.95 1 20 0.95 1511 101 70.79 0.9 10 70.79 0.9 1512 21 246 0.95 2 246 0.95 1513 11 348 0.96 1 34B 0.95 1513 41 100 1 4 100 1 1513 181 1 1 18 1 1 1513 371 24.07 1 37 24.07 1 1514 11 41 0.95 1 41 0.95 1515 31 388 0.95 3 388 0.95 1515 281 8.4 1 281 8.4 1 1556 31 1220 0.9 3 0 0.9 1558 31 1052 0.9 3 445 0.9 1558 231 117.8 0.9 23 0 0.9 1558 261 82.2 0.9 26 0 0.9 1559 1 225 0.9 1 262 0.9 1559 3 238 0.9 3 445 0.9 1559 10 50 0.9 10 75 0.9 1559 23 117.8 0.9 23 0 0.9 1559 26 82.2 0.9 26 0 0.9 1713 34 443 11 341 443 1 U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\TGcalc\LandUseAltsTGCom are\LuForModell LuChan eCom are.xIs SubMax loq CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU_Code Quantity Occu ancyRate LU_Code Quantity OccupancyRate 1516 2 67 0.95 2 67 0.95 1516 4 100 1 4 100 1 1516 36 88.67 1 361 88.67 1 1517 3 160 0.95 31 160 0.95 1517 10 71.08 0.9 101 71.08 0.9 1517 23 9.75 0.9 231 9.75 0.9 1517 281 13.39 1 281 13.39 1 1517 291 406 1 29 406 1 1517 301 780 1 301 780 1 1517 361 31.38 1 36 31.38 1 1518 1 441 0.95 1 441 0.95 1518 21 67 0.95 2 67 0.95 1518 381 0.95 1 381 0.95 1 1519 11 475 0.95 1 475 0.95 1519 381 14.23 1 38 14.23 1 1520 1 207 0.95 1 207 0.95 1521 1 580 0.95 1 580 0.95 1521 291 498 1 29 498 1 1521 381 9.73 1 38 9.73 1 1522 11 119 0.95 1 119 0.95 1522 21 120 0.95 2 120 0.95 1522 101 96.54 0.9 10 96.54 0.9 1522 231 12.9 0.9 23 12.9 0.9 1408 11 145 0.95 1 145 0.95 1409 71 300 0.9 7 300 0.9 1409 101 35 0.9 10 35 0.9 1409 131 8 0.9 13 8 0.9 1409 231 660 0.9 23 660 0:9 1409 381 3.33 1 381 3.33 1' 1410 21 88 0.95 21 88 0.95 1411 101 1.38 0.9 101 1.38 0.9 1411 401 15.69 1 401 15.69 1 1412 11 60 0.95 1 60 0.95 1413 2 33 0.95 2 33 0.95 1413 181 60.33 1 181 60.33 1 1413 231 67.95 0.9 231 67.95 0.9 1413 391 45.91 1 39 45.91 1 1415 11 153 0.95 1 153 0.95 1415 361 8.73 1 36 8.73 1 1416 11 198 0. 55 1 198 0.95 1417 1 56 0.95 1 56 0.95 1418 1 59 0.95 1 59 0.95 1419 1 173 0.95 1 1739 0.95 1420 11 465 0.95 1 465 0.95 1421 1 116 0.95 1 116 0.95 1421 2 60 0.95 2 60 0.95 1421 3 352 0.95 3 352 0.95 1421 10 174.8 0.9 10 174.8 0.9 1421 13 4.37 0.9 131 4.37 0.9 1421 15 3 n Cil 151 3 0.9 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU Code Quant4 Occu anc Rate LU Code lQuantity Occu anc Rate 1421 23 214.66 0.9 231 214.66 0.9 1421 24 43.22 0,9 24 43.22 0.9 1421 29 636 1 29 636 1 1421 32 5.24 1 32 5.24 1 1422 1 490 0.95 1 490 0.95 1423 1 266 0.95 1 266 0.95 1423 371 18.23 1 37 18.23 1 1423 381 4 1 38 4 1 1424 31 1445 0.95 31 1445 0.95 1373 101 35.08 0.9 101 36.46 0.9 1373 231 78.13 0.9 23 85.073 0.9 1373 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1373 261 0.9 25 0 0.9 1373 261 12.19 0.9 26 0 0.9 1374 101 35.08 0.9 10 42.231 0.9 1374 231 78.13 0.9 23 84.463 0.9 1374 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1374 251 0 0.9 251 0 0.9 1374 261 12.19 0.9 26 0 0.9 1375 101 54.46 0.9 10 61.518 0.9 1375 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1375 231 117.2 0.9 23 123.035 0.9 1375 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1375 251 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1375 261 18.29 0.9 26 0 0.9 1376 101 56.13 0.9 101 67.464 0.9 1376 231 125.01 0.9 23 134.927 0.9 1376 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1376 251 0 0.9 25 0 019 1376 261 19.51 0.9 26 0 0.9 1377 101 80.68 0.9 10 74,583 0.9 1377 231 179.7 0.9 23 213.096 0.9 1377 24 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1377 25 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1377 26 28.05 0.9 26 0 0.9 1378 10 91.21 0.9 10 85.378 0.9 1378 23 203.14 0.9 23 243.936 0.9 1378 24 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1378 25 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1378 261 31.7 0.9 26 0 0.9 1425 101 1.73 0.9 101 1.73 0.9 1425 231 128.81 0.9 23 128.81 0.9 1425 361 24.1 1 36 24.1 1 1426 1 119 0.95 1 119 0.95 1426 36 40 1 36 40 1 1427 1 550 0.95 1 0 0.95 1427 2 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1427 10 21.39 0.9 10 152.392 0.9 1427 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 14271 16 0 1 161 1 16 1 1 1 ■ CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU Code Quantit Occu ancyRate LU_Code Quantity OccupancyRate 1427 23 29.63 0.9 23 67.556 0.9 1427 24 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1427 30 2184 1 30 0 1 1427 35 58 1 35 0 1 1427 36 59.68 1 36 0 1 1427 37 13.37 1 37 0 1 1427 38 0.4 1 38 0 1 1428 1 257 0.95 1 550 0.95 1428 3 152 0.95 3 0 0.95 1428 7 140 0.9 7 0 0.9 1428 10 332.52 0.9 10 0 0.9 1428 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1428 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1428 16 0 1 16 0 1 1428 19 0 1 19 0 1 1428 20 0 1 20 0 1 1428 23 75.09 0.9 23 Q 0.9 1428 24 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1428 ,37 22.31 1 37 13.37 1 1525 3 1100 0.95 3 1100 0.95 1526 1 290 0.95 1 290 0.95 1618 1 6 0.95 1 6 0.95 1527 2 125 0.95 2 125 0.95 1429 1 656 0.95 1 656 0.95 1429 2 13 0.95 2 13 0.95 1429 3 59 0.95 3 59 0.95 1429 21 90 1 21 90 1 1429 29 436 1 29 436 1 1429 37 0.9 1 37 0.9 1 1429 38 3.03 1 38 3.03 1 1528 28 7.32 1 28 7.32 1 1528 36 26.01 1 36 26.01 1 1430 1 30 0.95 1 30 0.95 1430 6 0 0.9 6 0 0.9 1430 7 64 0.9 7 64 0.9 1430 10 275.98 0.9 10 274.009 0:9 1430 13 0 0.9 13 0 0,9 1430 15 0 0.9 15 Q 0.9 1430 16 0 1 16 0 1 1430 18 q 1 18 0 1 1430 23 283.82 0.9 23 220.911 0.9 1430 33 9.9 1 33 0 1 1431 3 36 0.95 3 154 0.95 1431 10 149.91 0.9 10 59.963 0.9 1431 13 0 0.9 13 Q 0.9 1431 17 q 1 17 0 1 1431 23 77.65 0.9 23 0 0.9 1432 1 205 0.95 1 200 0.95 1432 2 379 -6.-9-5-2- 379 0.95 1432 3 8 0.95 3 297 0.95 X11 11 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU_Code Quantity Occupant Rate LU Code Quantity Occu ant Rate 1432 6 0 0.9 6 0 0.9 1432 7 53 0.9 7 169,786 0.9 1432 10 66.38 0.9 10 169.786 0.9 1432 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1432 23 135.73 0.9 23 0 0.9 1432 24 11.29 0.9 24 169.231 0.9 1433 1 98 0.95 1 98 0.95 1433 21 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1433 31 142 0.95 3 142 0.95 1433 231 67.16 0.9 23 67.16 0.9 1433 241 24.46 0.9 24 352.249 0;9 1433 261 298.12 0.9 26 0 0.9 1433 351 270 1 35 270 1 1715 241 142.43 0;9 241 142.43 0.9 1714 31 673 0.95 3 673 0.95 1715 101 17.76 0.9 10 17.76 0.9 1434 231 9.66 0.9 23 9.66 0.9 1716 24 142.43 0.9 24 142.43 0.9 1434 281 7.77 1 28 7.77 1 1434 341 822 1 34 822 1 1716 351 95 1 35 95 1 1435 11 68 0.95 11 68 0.95 1435 21 28 0.95 2 28 0.95 1435 101 10.8 0.9 10 10.8 0.9 1435 '131 8.4 0.9 13 8.4 0.9 1435 151 2.7 0.9 15 2.7 0.9 1379 231 349.64 0.9 23 370.446 0.9 1380 231 158.61 0.9 23 168.054 0.9 1381 231 221.8 0.9 23 235.001 0.9 1382 231 321.53 0.9 23 0 0.9 1383 231 210.33 0.9 23 210.33 0.9 1384 101 25.25 0.9 10 0 0.9 1384 231 67.02 0.9 23 153.767 0.9 1385 71 349 0.9 7 349 0.9 1386 231 228.21 0.9 23 164,066 0.9 1387 231 184.32 0.9 23 184.32 0.9 1388 101 106.11 0.9 10 120.596 0.9 1388 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1389 101 46.3 1 10 24.287 1 1389 231 201.78 0.9 23 231.304 0.9 1390 231 146.48 0.9 23 167,924 0.9 1391 231 97.42 0.9 23 111.731 0.9 1392 101 17.78 1 10 19.324 1 1392 231 160.59 0.9 23 166.435 0.9 1393 101 58.12 0.9 10 63.118 0.9 1436 2 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1436 3 1370 0.95 3 1352 0.95 1436 4 0 1 4 0 1 1436 10 3.5 0.9 101 24.801 0.9 1436 24 39.6 0.9 24 85.203 0.9 11 11 11 X13 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU_Code Quantity OccupancyRate LU_Code lQuantity OccupancyRate 1436 26 48.002 0.9 26 48.002 0.9 1436 35 169 1 351 169 1 1436 38 0.17 1 381 0.17 1 1437 26 5 0.9 26 5 0.9 1438 23 57.4 0.9 23 0 0.9 1438 26 8.33 0.9 26 3.61 0.9 1438 271 0 0.9 27 ' 0 0.9 1438 291 622 1 29 622 1 1439 21 0.95 2 0 0.95 1439 31 464 0.95 3 513 0.95 1439 51 0 0.95 5 0 0.95 1439 101 50.91 0.9 10 78.46 0.9 1439 231 239.51 0.9 23 239.51 0.9 1439 241 61.63 0.9 241 219.056 0.9 1439 251 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1439 261 837.27 0.9 26 837.27 0.9 1439 351 59 1 35 59 1 1440 21 281 0.95 2 281 0.95 1441 11 462 0.95 1 462 0.95 1441 21 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1441 31 293 0.95 3 604 0.95 1441 61 90 0.9 61 0 0.9 1441 101 50.03 0.9 101 78.212 0.9 1441 131 0 0.9 131 0 0.9 1441 151 0 0.9 151 0 0.9 1442 11 43 0.95 1 43 0.95 1442 21 214 0.95 2 214 0.95 1442 381 6.79 1 3§1 6.79 1 1443 1 125 0.95 1 125 0.95 1443 2 350 0.95 2 350 0.95 1443 3 54 0.95 3 54 0.95 1443 38 6.5 1 38 6.5 1 1444 1 94 0.95 1 94 0.95 1444 2 498.5 0.95 2 498.5 0.95 1445 1 139 0.9 1 139 0.9 1445 2 509 0.9 2 509 0.9 1446 11 124 0.95 11 124 0.95 1446 21 239 0.95 21 239 0.95 1446 38 2.69 1 381 2.69 1 1447 1 88 0.9 1 88 0.9 1447 21 415 0.9 2 415 0.9 1448 1 87 0.9 1 87 0.9 1448 2 103 0.9 2 103 0.9 1448 10 26.17 0.9 10 26.17 0.9 1448 13 2.24 0.9 13 2.24 0.9 1448 23 12.191 0.91 231 12.19 0.9 1448 24 0.991 0.91 241 0.99 0.9 1449 2 951 0.91 21 95 0.9 1449 10 74,9 0.9 10 86 445 0.9 1449 13 0 0.91 131 0 0.9 \0 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU_Code Quanta Occu anc Rate LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate 1449 15 0 0.9 15 0.9 1449 23 2002 0.9 23 a 0.9 1450 2 159 0.9 2 159 0.9 1450 3 3 0.9 3 134 0.9 1450 6 16 0.9 6 16 0.9 1450 10 67.59 0.9 10 81.79 0.9 1450 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1450 231 35.75 0.9 23 103A85 0.9 1451 11 22 0.9 1 22 0.9 1451 21 110 0.9 2 110 0.9 1451 31 5 0.9 3 5 0.9 1451 61 3 0.9 6 3 0.9 1451 71 22 0.9 7 183 0.9 1451 101 82.75 0.9 101 93.218 0.9 1451 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1451 151 0 0.9 15 0 0:9 1451 231 8 0.9 23 0 0.9 1452 21 12 0.9 2 102 0.9 1452 101 130.51 0.9 10 0 0.9 1452 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1452 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1452 231 90.22 0.9 23 0 0.9 1452 371 6 1 37 0 1 1453 101 111.58 0.9 10 162.961 0.9 1453 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1453 211 685 1 21 685 1 1453 231 119.9 0.9 23 0 0.9 1453 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1453 361 26.01 1 361 0 1 1454 11 41 0.9 1 0 0.9 1454 21 172 0.9 2 0 0.9 1454 101 201 78 0.9 10 239 480 0.9 1454 ill 085 1 11 t1.85 1 1454 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1454 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1454 231 1015 0.9 23 0 0.9 1454 37 165 1 37 4 65 1 1455 11 3 0.9 1 3 0.9 1455 21 403 0.9 2 403 0.9 1455 101 108.22 0.9 10 108.22 0.9 1455 131 9.2 0.9 13 9.2 0.9 1455 231 1' 0.9 23 1 0.9 1455 261 38 0.9 26 38 0.9 1456 11 1040 0.9 1 1040 0.9 1456 21 102 0.9 2 102 0.9 1456 3 26 0.9 3 26 0.9 1457 1 218 0.9 1 218 0.9 1457 2 476 0.9 2 476 0.9 1457 3 103 0.9 3 103 0.9 1467 5 58 0.9 51 581 0.9 xzo CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU_Code Quantity Occu ancyRate LU_Code Quantity OccupancyRate 1457 6 26 0.9 6 26 0.9 1457 10 12.54 0.9 10 12.54 0.9 1457 15 1.25 0.9 15 1.25 0.9 1457 '20 58 1 20 58 1 1457 28 13.44 1 28 13.44 1 1457 29 389 1 29 389 1 1457 361 10.05 1 301 10.05 1 1457 371 17.4 1 37 17.4 1 1457 381 1.2 1 38 1 1.2 1 1458 11 366 0.9 1 0 0.9 1458 21 684 0.9 2 0 0.9 1458 3 173 0.9 3 0 0.9 1458 101 20.81 0.9 101 104.126 0.9 1458 151 0 0.9 151 0 0.9 1458 201 14 1 201 0 1 1458 231 29.26 0.9 231 0 0.9 1458 241 0 0.9 241 0 0.9 1458 321 4.8 1 32 0 1 1458 361 2 1 36 0 1 1395 71 164 0.9 7 154 0.9 1395 101 120 0.9 10 20.19 0.9 1395 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1396 231 591.6 0.9 23 591.6 0.9 1397 231 165.04 0.9 23 165.04 0.9 1459 11 9 0.9 1 1 351 0.9 1459 21 131 0.9 21 684 0.9 1459 31 69 0.9 3 173 0.9 1459 71 34 0.9 71 0 0.9 1459 101 196.53 0.9 101 2.4 0.9 1459 ill 4.25 1 ill 0 1 1459 131 0 0.9 131 0 0.9 1459 15 0 0.9 151 0 0.9 1459 17 0 1 17 0 1 1459 21 350 1 21 0 1 1459 23 60 0.9 23 0 0.9 1459 33 1.7 1 33 0 1 1459 37 4.97 1 37 0 1 1460 1 677 0.9 1 677 0.9 1460 21 194 0.9 2 194 0.9 1460 31 51 0.9 31 51 0.9 1460 191 2 1 191 2 1 1460 381 0.83 1 381 0.83 1 1461 11 214 0.9 11 214 0.9 1461 21 263 0.9 21 263 0.9 1461 101 4.99 0.9 10 4.99 0.9 1461 13 20 0.9 '13 20 0.9 1461 17 8.29 1 17 8.29 1 1461 20 352 1 20 352. 1 1461 23 12 0.9 23 12 0.9 1461 26 5.04 0.9 26 5.04 0.9 iI CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate LU Code Quantity OccUpenc Rate 1461 38 0.78 1 38 0.78 1 1462 1 32 0.9 1 32 0.9 1463 3 520 0.9 3 520 0.9 1463 10 112.45 0.9 10 112.45 0.9 1463 13 21.55 0.9 13 21.55 0.9 1463 16 17.42 1 16 17.42 1 1464 11 43 0.9 1 43 0.9 1464 21 3119 0.9 21 3119 0.9 1464 61 4 0.9 6 4 0.9 1464 iol 73.07 0.9 10 73.07 0.9 1464 131 16.55 0.9 13 16.55 0.9 1464 151 5.43 0.9 15 5.43 0.9 1464 231 18.37 0.9 23 18.37 0.9 1464 24 2.75 0.9 24 2.75 0.9 1464 33 1.9 1 33 1.9 1 1464 36 3 1 36 3 1 1464 38 1.62 1 38 1.62 1 1465 5 397 0.95 5 397 0.95 1465 10 60.63 0.9 10 60.63 0.9 1465 13 18.19 0.9 13 18.19 0.9 1465 201 218 1 20 218 1 1465 231 30.31 0.9 23 30.31 0.9 1466 21 212 0.95 21 212 0.95 1466 71 754 0.9 71 764 0.9 1466 131 83.93 0.9 13 83.93 0.9 1466 191 16 1 1'9 16 1 1466 221 64 1 22 64 1 1466 231 6 0.9 23 6 0.9 1466 371 2.69 1 37 2.69 1 1466 401 2 1 40 2 1 1467 31 1185 0.95 31 1185 0.95 1468 291 320 1 29 320 1 1469 21 792 0.95 2 792 0.95 1469 3 2251 0.95 3 225 0.95 1469 28 6.45 1 28 6.45 1 1469 29 294 1 29 294 1 1469 30 1801' 1 30 1801 1 1469 36 34.96 1 36 34.96 1 1469 37 34.97 1 37 34.97 1 1469 38 8 1 38 8 1 1470 21 145 0.95 2 145 0.95 1470 101 78.23 0.9 10 78.23 0.9 1470 191 19 1 19 19 1 1470 231 11.66 0.9 23 11.66 0.9 1398 231 82.583 0.9 23 0 0.9 1399 23 108.52 0.9 23 0 0.9 1400 23 62.08 0.9 23 0 0.9 1471 1 460 0.95 1 460 0.95 1471 38 2 1 381 1 1472 16 209.75 11 161 209.751 1 1 11 I CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU_Code Quantity Occupanc Rate LU_Code Quantity OccupancyRate 1473 3 300 0.95 3 300 0.95 1474 1 1686 0.95 1 1686 0.95 1474 2 208 0.95 2 208 0.95 1474 3 736 0.95 3 736 0.95 1474 10 35 0.9 10 35 0.9 1474 13 6.35 0.9 13 6.35 0.9 1474 381 14.23 1 381 14.23 1 1475 251 81.73 0.9 251 81.73 0.9 1475 271 196.42 0.9 271 196.42 0.9 1475 291 52 1 291 52 1 1475 331 55.2 1 331 55.2 1 1475 361 100.28 1 361 100.28 1 1476 21 227 0.95 21 227 0.95 1477 11 500 0.95 11 500 0.95 1478 21 50 0.95 2 50 0.95 1479 11 101 0.95 1 101 0.95 1479 21 54 0.95 2 54 0.95 1480 21 144 0.95 2 144 0.95 1480 31 80 0.95 3 80 0.95 1401 241 86.096 0.9 24 86.096 0.9 1402 231 45.794 0.9 231 45.794 0.9 1481 11 101 0.95 1 101 0.95 1481 21 182 0.95 2 182 0.95 1481 101 2.3 0.9 10 2.3 0.9 1482 11 142 0.95 1 142 0.95 14B2 21 43 0.95 2 43 0.95 1482 31 73 0.95 3 73 0.95 1482 401 181.2 1 40 181.2 1 1483 11 21 0.95 1 21 0.95 1484 71 425 0.9 71 425 0.9 1484 101 21.7 0.9 101 21.7 .0.9 1484 131 0 0.9 131 0 0.9 1484 231 955.03 0.9 231 1064.061 0.9 1485 91 1633.84 0.8 91 1559 0.8 1485 101 0 0.9 101 0 0.9 1485 211 1700 1 211 1700 1 1486 2 0 0.95 21 0 0.95 1486 3 245 0.95 31 452 0.95 1486 10 125.68 0.9 101 175.68 0.9 1486 13 0 0.9 131 0 0.9 1486 16 0 1 161 0 1 1486 23 881 0.9 231 881 0.9 1486 31 40 1 311 40 1 1487 21 69 0.95 21 69 0.95 1487 71 611 0.9 7 1088 0.9 1487 10 7.5 0.9 10 7.5 0.9 1487 19 22 1 19 22 1 1487 23 11.63 0.9 23 11.63 0.9 1487 40 99A 1 40 99.4 1 1488 2 122 0.95 2 122 0.95 I X103 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU Cade Quantity Occu anc Rate LU Code Quanti Occu anc Rate 1489 2 228 0.95 2 228 0.95 1489 10 5 0.9 10 5 0.9 1490 23 115.8 0.9 23 115.8 0:9 1403 7 471 0.9 7 471 0.9 1403 10 16 0.9 10 46.8 0.9 1403 18 0 1 18 0 1 1403 231 393.05 0.9 23 432.355 0.9 1403 371 10.9 0.9 37 10.9 0.9 1491 231 468:64 0.9 23 646.692 0.9 1491 241 351.95 0.9 24 530.002 0.9 1492 101 38.1 0.9 10 186.368 0.9 1492 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1492 181 0 1 18 0 1 1492 211 2150 1, 211 2150 1 1492 231 442.11 0.9 231 442.11 0.9 1493 23 409.51 0.9 231 409.51 0.9 1494 10 105 0.9 101 105 0.9 1494 32 65 1 321 65 1 1495 1 416 0.9 1 416 0.9 1495 2 37 0.9 2 37 0.9 1495 10 2.38 0.9 10 2.38 0.9 1495 17 62.02 1 17 62.02 1 1495 201 283 1 20 283 1 1495 231 186.53 0.9 23 186.53 0.9 1495 381 6.53 1 38 6.53 1 1496 11 73 0.9 1 73 0.9 1495 21 256 0.9 2 256 0.9 1496 31 152 0.9 3 152 0.9 1496 291 12.03 1 29 12.03 1 1497 11 143 0.9 1 143 0.9 1497 21 214 0.9 2 214 0.9 1497 31 48 0.9 3 48 0.9 1498 11 234 0.9 11 234 0.9 1498 21 0 0.9 2 0 0.9 1498 31 48 0.9 3 48 0.9 1498 101 92.44 0.9 10 49.763 0.9 1498 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1498 231 23.98 0.9 23 23.697 0.9 1498 381 3.6 1 38 3.6 1 1499 1 144 0.9 1 0 0.9 1500 1 178 0.95 1 178 0.95 1500 381 1.03 1 38 1.03 1 1501 1 849 0.9 1 0 0.9 1501 2 0 0.9 2 0 0.9 1501 10 106.84 0.9 10 0 0.9 1501 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1501 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1501 21 0 1 21 0 1 1501 23 36.05 0.91 231 0 0.9 15011 24 0 0.91 241 01 0.9 \ V F CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU_Code Quantity OccupancyRate LU_Code lQuantity OccupancyRate 1501 38 2.5 1 38 0 1 1502 1 186 0.9 1 849 0.9 1502 2 0 0.9 2 0 0.9 1502 10 104.41 0.9 10 100.075 0.9 1502 13 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1502 15 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1502 231 33.09 0.9 23 33.358 0.9 1502 241 0 0.9 241 0 0.9 1404 231 434.953 0.9 23 434.953 0.9 1405 10 129.3 0.9 10 128.61 0.9 1405 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9' 1405 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1405 231 688.16 0.9 23 695.157 0.9 1406 251 0 0.9 25 0 0.9 1406 261 430 0.9 26 0 0.9 1407 101 31.72 0.9 101 31.72 0.9 1407 151 1.56 0.9 15 1.56 0.9 1407 231 124.99 0.9 23 124.99 0.9 1407 241 3.77 0.9 24 3.77 0.9 1503 11 52 0.9 1 0 0.9 1503 21 0 0.9 2 0 0.9 1503 101 88.02 0.9 10 21.444 0.9 1503 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1503 151 0 0.9 151 0 0.9 1503 181 0 1 181 0 1 1503 231 9.97 0.9 231 0 019 1503 241 0 0.9 241 0 0.9 1504 11 542 0.95 11 186 0.95 1504 21 0 0.95 21 0 0.95 1504 101 88.02 0.9 101 93.854 0.9 1504 131 0 0.9 13 0 0.9 1504 151 0 0.9 15 0 0.9 1504 181 0 1 18 0 1 1504 231 9.97 0.9 23 31.285 0.9 1504 241 0 0.9 24 0 0.9 1504 361 12.34 1 36 0 1 1505 11 843 0.95 1 0 0.95 1505 21 0 0.95 21 0 0.95 1505 101 58.9 0.9 101 20.111 0.9 1505 131 0 0.9 131 0 0.9 1505 151 0 0.9 151 0 0.9 1505 231 35 0.9 231 0 0.9 1505 321 3.8 1 321 0 1 1505 331 5 1 331 0 1 1506 1 363 0.95 1 0 0.95 1506 2 0 0.95 2 0 0.95 1506 3 6 0.95 3 0 0.95 1507 1 1421 0.95 1 1421 0.95 1507 38 0.781 1 38 0.781 1 1508 1 2281 0.95 1 2281 0.95 it X?5 CURRENTLY ADOPTED SUBAREA MAXIMUM LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate LU Code Quantity Occu anc Rate 1508 2 120 0.95 2 120 0.95 1508 3 120 0.95 3 120 0.95 1508 29 790 1 29 790 1 1608 37 5.85 1 37 5.85 1 1510 1 200 0.95 1 200 0.95 1511 1 20 0.95 1 20 0.95 1511 101 70.79 0.9 10 70.79 0.9 1512 2 246 0.95 2 246 0.95 1513 1 348 0.95 1 348 0.95 1513 4 100 1 4 100 1 1513 18 1 1 18 1 1 1513 37 24.07 1 37 24.07 1 1514 1 41 0.95 1 41 0.95 1515 3 388 0.95 31 388 0.95 1515 281 8.4 1 28 8.4 1 1556 31 1220 0.9 3 0 0.9 1558 31 1052 0.9 3 445 0.9 1658 231 117.8 0.9 23 0 0.9 1558 261 82.2 0.9 26 0 0.9 1559 1 225 0.9 1 262 0.9 1559 3 238 0.9 3 445 0.9 1559 10 50 0.91 101 75 0.9 1559 23 117.8 0.9 23 0 0.9 1559 26 82.2 0.9 26 0 0.9 1713 34 443 11 341 443 1 U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\TGcaic\LandUseAltsTGCom are\LUForModell LuChan eCom are.xls SubMax 11 1 Total Trip Ends By NBTM TAZ Analysis Year: 2040 Reference Number: 01232 Runld: SAmaxl Build Date: 4/15/2005 Land Use: SAmax1 Build rime: 10:30:00 AM Network: 8006 Modeler. Marne Whiteman NOW TAZ OO AM NO Prod HSch AM HSch Prod HW Attr HW Prod 00 AM 00 Prod 0W Attr OW Prod Total 1373 588 0 0 0 386 0 410 419 264 269 2,336 1374 663 0 0 0 399 0 457 466 281 286 2,550 1375 965 0 0 0 581 0 666 678 409 416 3,715 1376 1,059 0 0 0 637 0 730 744 449 456 4,074 1377 1,254 0 0 0 926 0 889 911 610 621 5,212 1378 1,436 0 0 0 1,060 0 1,018 1,043 699 711 5,967 1379 486 0 0 0 1,288 0 477 514 661 678 4,104 1380 221 0 0 0 584 0 216 233 300 307 1,862 1381 309 0 0 0 817 0 303 326 419 430 2,603 1382 303 1,472 0 232 131 1,523 404 404 212 19 4,700 1383 276 0 0 0 731 0 271 292 375 385 2,330 1384 202 0 0 0 535 0 198 213 274 281 1,703 1385 448 86 0 14 658 89 423 429 374 400 2,920 1386 215 0 0 0 571 0 211 227 293 300 1,817 1387 242 0 0 0 641 0 237 256 329 337 2,042 1388 1,576 0 0 0 300 0 994 995 372 374 4,611 1389 709 255 0 40 894 264 590 613 533 510 4,409 1390 221 0 0 0 584 0 216 233 300 307 1,860 1391 147 0 0 0 389 0 144 155 199 204 1,238 1392 486 0 0 0 597 0 378 394 345 353 2,554 1393 1,014 0 0 0 659 0 706 721 452 460 4,012 1394 764 0 0 0 746 0 605 614 455 488 3,671 1395 454 0 0 0 337 0 342 345 222 239 1,939 1396 777 0 0 0 2,057 0 762 820 1,055 1,082 6,554 1397 217 0 0 0 574 0 213 229 294 302 1,628 1398 11819 760 0 120 384 787 1,257 1,258 502 405 7,292 1399 157 760 0 120 68 787 208 209 109 10 2,428 1400 92 448 0 71 40 463 123 123 64 6 1,429 1401 272 0 0 0 339 0 236 239 195 215 1,496 1402 60 0 0 0 159 0 59 63 82 84 507 1403 1,794 0 0 0 2,576 0 1,522 1,574 1,444 1,522 10,433 1404 672 492 0 78 1,556 509 695 738 847 802 6,389 1405 2,807 1,039 0 164 2,829 1,075 2,240 2,310 1,786 1,684 15,935 1406 607 2,949 0 465 263 3,053 809 809 425 38 9,418 1407 624 0 0 0 535 0 454 467 337 344 2,761 Friday, April 15, 2005 , r3 Page 1 of 6 Analysis Year. 2040 Runld: SAmax1 Lend Use: SAmax1 Network., B006 Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/16/2005 Build Time: 10:30:00 AM Modeler. Marne Whiteman NNTM TAZ NO AUP NO Prod NSM AM IM Prod NW AUP NW Prod 00 AM 00 Prod OW AUP OW Prod TO 1408 94 522 0 48 45 267 97 97 47 21 1,239 1409 1,835 0 0 0 2,970 0 1,571 1,642 1,630 1,693 11,341 1410 31 247 0 28 11 152 44 45 18 2 579 1411 34 0 0 0 16 0 24 24 12 13 124 1412 39 2% 0 20 19 111 40 40 19 9 513 1413 451 93 0 11 487 57 374 381 293 30B 2,454 1414 96 476 8 40 159 172 119 122 95 82 1,371 1415 103 551 0 51 66 282 108 109 58 32 11360 1416 126 668 0 66 62 365 128 126 64 29 1,636 1417 36 202 0 19 18 103 37 38 18 8 478 1418 38 209 0 20 18 109 39 39 19 9 50o 1419 112 623 0 58 54 319 116 116 56 25 1,478 1420 300 1,648 0 155 146 857 309 309 149 68 3,940 1421 3,080 1,477 560 137 1,600 840 2,237 2,266 1,240 1,166 14,603 1422 316 1,737 0 163 154 903 325 328 157 71 4,152 1423 236 943 0 88 233 490 255 255 163 130 2,793 1424 504 3,694 0 327 185 2,146 723 723 298 27 8,627 1425 204 0 0 0 502 0 197 210 260 267 1,640 1426 97 422 0 40 120 219 106 108 79 61 1,252 1427 1,882 2,978 1,922 280 1,103 1,894 1,538 1,556 867 715 14,435 1428 5,016 1,464 0 120 1,665 699 3,417 3,430 1,543 1,512 18,856 1429 468 2,554 384 236 305 1,319 499 502 269 141 6,677 1430 4,807 511 0 45 1,746 284 3,209 3,234 1,532 1,521 16,889 1431 2,125 358 0 26 629 181 1,409 1,417 616 599 7,361 1432 3,186 2,564 0 255 1,335 1,465 2,401 2,409 1,166 1,051 15,832 1433 1,354 735 0 102 1,792 402 1,238 1,259 1,043 1,089 9,015 1434 2,189 0 0 0 4,625 0 2,833 2,784 2,230 3,312 17,974 1435 400 319 0 32 91 174 277 278 109 92 1,772 1436 1,081 3,068 0 329 757 2,014 1,126 1,134 640 410 10,55E 1437 1 0 0 0 11 0 2 2 5 5 27 1438 64 292 647 30 132 194 81 86 81 57 1,553 1439 2,378 1,163 0 124 3,889 764 2,141 2,239 2,181 2,148 17,027 1440 97 756 0 90 36 486 139 139 58 5 1,806 1441 1,534 3,249 0 290 416 1,748 1,260 1,261 514 321 10,594 1442 105 745 0 83 46 449 138 138 60 13 1,777 1443 224 1,561 0 165 95 916 288 288 126 28 3,682 1444 235 1,713 0 190 93 1,036 312 313 133 23 4,048 Fdday, April 15, 2005 � I Page 2 of 6 Analysts Year: 2040 Runid: SAmaxl Land Use: SAmaxl Network: S006 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build Time: 10:30:00 AM Modeler, Marlie Whiteman MOTM TAZ MO AM M Prod IN AM MSch Prod MW AM OW Prod DOAM OWN OW Attr OW Prod Total 1445 250 1;681 0 173 103 667 323 323 142 28 3,690 1446 164 1,102 0 118 71 642 203 203 90 24 2,617 1447 189 1,290 0 134 76 516 247 248 108 19 2,828 1448 487 527 0 51 157 201 361 362 161 129 2,436 1449 1,223 078 0 66 249 266 846 847 323 273 4,772 1450 1,409 699 0 71 751 279 1,044 1,056 583 546 6,443 1451 1,617 349 0 36 640 140 11070 1,074 531 533 5,891 1452 2,551 562 0 54 870 222 1,759 1,764 801 785 9,387 1453 2,076 142 0 13 427 54 1,331 1,333 510, 504 6,390 1454 3,289 963 0 89 687 368 ' 2,192 2,194 843 777 11,402 1455 1,718 990 0 107 439 409 1,199 1,203 494 424 6,984 1456 732 4,890 0 321 324 1,285 825 826 342 146 9;691 1457 720 2,211 342 221 563 853 751 754 440 315 7,171 1458 1,956 3,543 0 351 -522 1,380 1,586 1,588 652 415 11,992 1459 2,199 1,088 0 106 524 428 1,526 1,527 610 537 8,546 1460 504 2,728 0 250 249 995 547 548 262 112 6,194 1461 971 1,716 0 129 346 503 773 777 341 261 5,819 1462 21 128 0 9 10 36 22 22 10 4 262 1463 2,230 1,640 0 111 470 462 1,571 1,574 592 502 9,152 1464 2,447 7,683 0 837 748 3,189 2,373 2,378 997 438 21,090 1465 1,435 869 0 116 409 467 1,017 1,021 441 368 6,143 1466' 3,073 476 0 68 2,406 367 2,483 2,488 1,511 1,801 14,671 1467 404 2,829 0 268 151 1,760 574 574 245 22 6,826 1468 5 0 282 0 55 0 10 12 26 26 415 1469 543 2,586 1,844 304 903 1,704 756 770 592 433 10,434 1470 1,232 480 0 46 412 251 881 881 369 405 4,957 1471, 317 2,058 0 153 146 848 347 347 149 68 4,432 1472 2,318 0 0 0 675 0 1,496 1,504 654 661 7,308 1473 118 1,043 0 68• 38 445 176 176 62 6 2,132 1474 1,984 8,328 0 793 767 4,560 1,945 1,947 876 404 21,604 1475 291 0 46 0 1,112 0 372 395 551 590 3,358 1476 90 861 0 72 29 393 136 136 47 4 1,769 1477 347 2,291 0 166 157 921 381 382 161 73 4,879 1478 20 190 0 16 6 86 30 30 10 1 390 1479 92 668 0 51 39 280 109 109 44 16 . 1,406 1480 92 899 0 64 29 368 140 140 46 4 1,783 1481 177 1,236 0 92 61 501 213 213 77 25 2,594 Friday, April 15, 2005 i C Page 3 of 6 Anatirsts Year. 2040 Runld.• SAmax1 Lend Use: SAmax1 Network: 8006 ' Reference Number. 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build 71me: 10:30:00 AM ' Modeler. Marlle Whiteman Elm TAZ N Attr W Prod W Attr Wh Prod MW AM N Prod W Attr DORM ONE AUr OW" TOW 1482 333 1,152 0 77 205 444 332 332 164 126 3,167 1483 15 102 0 7 7 39 17 17 7 3 213 1484 2,205 0 0 0 4,546 0 2,035 2,147 2,405 2,499 15,838 1485 12,083 0 0 0 3,081 0 7,764 7,787 3,211 3,257 37,183 1486 3,692 1,532 0 102 3,742 671 2,925 3,015 2,301 2,270 20,250 1487 2,070 2,272 0 157 2,703 1,006 2,067 2,087 1,584 1,671 15,617 1488 47 438 0 39 16 211 71 71 25 2 920 1469 154 818 0 73 42 394 173 173 63 20 1,910 1490 152 0 0 0 403 0 149 161 207 212 1,283 1491 2,539 77 0 12 4,340 80 2,309 2,392 2,367 2,505 16,622 1492 3,197 0 0 0 2,124 0 2,237 2,283 1,447 1,475 12,763 1493 538 0 0 0 1,424 0 527 568 731 749 4,536 1494 1,476 0 0 0 560 0 996 999 476 497 5,004 1495 1,107 1,667 0 125 1,080 501 956 976 693 641 7,745 1496 190 1,478 11 121 73 474 261 261 103 18 2,990 1497 175 1,143 0 107 74 418 216 216 95 24 2,467 1498 988 949 0 80 313 323 711 714 315 266 4;660 1499 88 478 0 40 43 160 91 91 44 20 1,055 1500 122 774 0 59 57 328 132 132 58 26 1,688 1501 2,228 3,314 0 246 706 989 1,672 1,678 723 577 12,134 1502 1,659 728 0 61 453 247 1,119 1,123 473 437 6,301 1503 813 246 0 18 185 74 536 537 211 201 2,822 1504 1,442 1,930 0 186 433 1,036 1,061 1,064 460 363 7,975 1505 1,302 2,948 0 284 522 1,579 1,057 1,081 504 358 9,615 1506 496 1,286 0 122 180 678 408 409 187 122 3,867 1507 98 631 0 47 45 262 107 107 46 21 1,363 1508 275 1,691 695 141 286 806 343 348 211 130 4,927 1510 134 814 0 67 63 369 143 143 64 29 1,825 1511 938 81 0 7 182 37 598 598 225 223 2,889 1512 92 807 0 79 31 426 135 135 51 5 1,761 1513 364 1,804 0 135 316 676 417 417 235 171 4,536 1514 28 173 0 14 13 76 30 30 13 6 382 1515 173 1,160 0 88 117 576 245 245 115 48 2,768 1516 107 512 0 41 202 150 151 155 124 99 1,641 1517 1,081 471 1,044 36 608 238 798 808 454 438 5,974 1518 352 2,684 0 168 147 929 416 416 156 66 5,335 1519 320 1,089 0 158 159 875 340 340 158 75 4,314 Friday, April 15, 2005 � 6 Page 4 of 6 1 Analysis Year. 2040 Reference Number: 01232 Runld: SAmaxl Build Date: 4/15/2005 Land Use: SAmaxl Build Time: 10:30:00 AM Network: Bo06 Modeler. Marlie Whiteman NNTM TAZ NO Attr 1520 137 1521 396 1522 1,418 1523 195 1524 195 1525 406 1526 193 1527 46 1528 39 1529 355 1530 0 1531 821 1532 0 1534 179 1535 355 1536 754 1537 754 1538 84 1539 109 1540 294 1541 90 1642 0 1543 61 1544 250 1545 67 1546 61 1547 179 1548 179 1549 179 1550 92 1551 45 1552 0 1553 66 1554 55 1555 55 1556 180 1557 99 NSch Attr NSch 2,307 438 193 1,193 0 78 1,266 0 64 1,266 0 64 3,288 0 249 1,153 0 96 399 0 40 0 0 0 4,331 362 193 0 0 0 1,721 0 127 0 0 0 1,931 0 102 4,331 362 193 1,247 0 69 1,247 0 69 945 0 48 1,141 0 58 0 0 0 956 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,785 0 120 749 0 33 0 0 0 1,931 0 102 1,931 0 102 1,931 0 102 959 0 60 495 0 22 0 0 0 736 0 33 402 0 18 402 0 18 925 0 87 449 0 28 HW Attr HW Prod 65 382 274 1,069 337 427 240 278 240 278 141 1,633 91 534 16 216 113 0 139 842 0 0 267 677 0 0 80 397 139 842 205 269 205 269 22 187 110 227 675 0 51 226 5 0 292 0 87 578 11 161 292 0 80 397 80 397 80 397 17 • 283 7 108 0 0 11 160 108 87 108 87 108 485 18 150 ) Attr 00 Prod 145 145 427 431 993 996 263 265 263 265 595 596 204 205 68 68 48 49 550 552 0 0 672 673 0 0 261 261 550 552 574 576 574 576 113 114 151 155 352 352 120 121 1 1 72 82 340 342 90 90 72 82 261 261 261 261 261 261 117 117 60 60 0 0 89 89 77 79 77 79 187 187 92 92 67 230 384 160 160 227 93 26 57 148 0 280 0 84 148 220 220 32 77 352 46 2 142 102 22 142 84 84 84 33 15 0 22 62 62 98 31 OW Prod 129 343 120 120 20 42 2 64 45 0 205 0 28 45 182 182 4 44 411 18 2 142 22 0 142 28 28 28 0 0 0 0 52 52 54 11 1,853 5,894 6,169 2,851 2,851 7,156 2,612 880 371 7,515 0 5,443 0 3,323 7,515 4,096 4,096 1,549 2,073 2,436 1,687 11 792 4,625 1,225 792 3,323 3,323 3,323 1,679 811 0 1,206 939 939 2,311 968 Fdday, Apol 15, 2005 "-7 Page 5 of 6 Analysts Year. 2040 Runld: SAmax1 Lend Use: SAmaxl Network: Bo06 Reference Number: 01232 Build Date: 4/15/2005 Build 77me: 10:30:00 AM Modeler. Marne Whiteman NATM TAZ NO Attr NO Prod IM AM NM Prod NW Attr NW Prod 00 Attr 00 Prod OW Attr OW Prod Total 1558 391 2,338 396 217 257 1,306 471 474 247 103 6,200 1559 1,401 2,031 0 18B 479 1,144 1,104 1,107 492 373 8,318 1618 4 24 0 2 2 11 4 4 2 1 54 1713 434 0 0 0 2A40 0 620 670 1,042 1,104 6,010 1714 227 1,564 0 152 86 999 322 322 139 12 3,824 1715 811 0 0 0 765 0 649 656 470 512 3,864 1716 594 29 0 13 764 4 522 529 438 482 3,375 Fdday, April 15, 2005 Nr Page 6 of 6 APPENDIX.Z ' SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT TRIP GENERATION ' CHANGE FROM CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BY TAZ II 1 1 II u ' REVISED SUBAREA MAXIMUM TAZ TOTAL TAZ TOTAL CHANGE 1373 2274 1373 2336 62 1374 2274 1374 2550 276 1375 3481 ,1375 3715 234 1376 3638 1376 4074 436 1377 5229 1377 5212 -17 1378 5912 1378 5967 55 1379 3873 1379 4104 231 1380 1757 1380 1862 105 1381 2457 1381 2603 146 1382 3562 1382 4700 1138 1383 2330 1383 2330 0 1384 1708 1384 1703 -5 1385 2645 1385 2920 275 1386 2528 1386 1817 -711 1387 2042 1387 2042 0 1388 4057 1388 4611 554 1389 4202 1389 4409 207 1390 1623 1390 1860 237 1391 1079 1391 1238 159 1392 2534 1392 2554 20 1393 2222 1393 4012 1790 1394 3671 1394 3671 0 1395 5831 1395 1939 -3892 1396 6554 1396 6554 0 1397 1828, 1397 1828 0 1396 915 1398 7292 6377 1399 1202 1399 2428 1226 1400 688 1400 1429 741 1401 1496 1401 1496 0 1402 507 1402 507 0 1403 8820 1403 10433 1613 1404 4818 1404 6389 1571 1405 12567 1405 15935 3368 1406 2358 1406 9418 7060 1407 2761 1407 2761 0 1408 1239 1408 1239 0 1409 11341 1409 11341 0 1410 579 1410 579 0 1411 124 1411 124 0 1412 513 1412 513 0 1413 2454 1413 2454 0 1414 1371 1414 1371 0 1415 1360 1415 1360 0 1416 1636 1416 1636 0 1417 478 1417 478 0 1418 500 1418 500 0 1419 1478 1419 1478 0 1420 3940 1420 3940 0 1421 14603 1421 14603 0 1422 4152 1422 4152 0 1423 2793 1423 2793 062 1424 87 1424 8627 0 1425 1640 1425 1640 0 I' REVISED SUBAREA MAXIMUM TAZ TOTAL TAZ TOTAL CHANGE 1426 1252 1426 1252 0 1427 9534 1427 14435 4901 1428 18856 1428 18856 0 1429 6677 1429 6677 0 1430 14652 1430 16889 2237 1431 6824 1431 7361 537 1432 8933 1432 15832 6899 1433 4953 1433 9015 4062 1434 18081 1434 17974 -107 1435 1772 1435 1772 0 1436 9052 1436 10558 1506 1437 27 1437 27 0 1438 1487 1438 1553 66 1439 12964 1439 17027 4063 1440 1806 1440 1806 0 1441 8183 1441 10594 2411 1442 1777 1442 1777 0 1443 3682 1443 3682 0 1444 4048 1444 4048 0 1445 3690 1445 3690 0 1446 2617 1446 2617 0 1447 2828 1447 2828 0 1448 2436 1448 2436 0 1449 3589 1449 4772 1183 1450 3935 1450 6443 2508 1451 4203 1451 5891 1688 1452 6227 1452 9387 3160 1453 5989 1453 6390 401 1454 10211 1454 11402 1191 1455 6984 1455 6984 0 1466 9691 1456 '9691 0 1457 7171 1457 7171 0 1458 8321 1458 11992 3671 1459 9996 1459 8546 -1450 1460 6194 1460 6194 0 1461 5B19 1461 5B19 0 1462 262 1462 262 0 1463 9162 1463 9152 0 1464 21090 1464 21090 0 1465 6143 1465 6143 0 1466 14671 1466 14671 0 1467 6826 1467 6826 0 1468 415 1468 415 0 1469 10434 1469 10434 0 1470 4957 1470 4957 0 1471 4432 1471 4432 0 1472 7308 1472 7308 0 1473 2132 1473 2132 0 1474 21604 14741 21604 0 1475 3358 1475 3358 0 1476 1769 1476 1769 0 1477 4B79 1477 4879 0 1478 390 1478 390 0 -7-4 REVISED •SUBAREA MAXIMUM TAZ 1479 TOTAL 1406 TAZ 1479 TOTAL 1406 CHANGE 0 1480 1783 1480 1783 0 1481 2594 1481 2594 0 1482 3167 14821 3167 0 1483 213 1483 213 0 1484 14630 1484 15838 1208 1485 38940 1485 37183 -1757 1486 16889 1486 20250 3361 1487 6939 1487 16617 8678 1488 920 1488 920 0 1489 1910 1489 1910 0 1490 1283 1490 1283 0 1491 11308 1491 16622 5314 1492 7094 1492 12763 5669 1493 4536 1493 4536 0 1494 5004 1494 5004 0 1495 7745 1495 7745 0 1496 2990 1496 2990 0 1497 2467 1497 2467 0 1498 5773 1498 4660 -1113 1499 1055 1499 1055 0 1500 1688 1500 1688 0 1501 11328 1501 12134 806 1502 5722 1502 6301 579 1503 3884 1503 2822 -1062 1504 8078 1504 7975 -103 1505 9847 1505 9615 -232 1506 3067 1506 3867 800 1507 1363 1507 1363 0 1508 4927 1508 4927 0 1510 1825 1510 1825 0 1511 2889 1511 2889 0 1512 1761 1512 1761 0 1513 4536 1513 4536 0 1514 382 1514 382 0 1515 2768 1515 2768 0 1516 1541 1516 1541 0 1517 5974 1517 5974 0 1518 5335 1518 5335 0 1519 4314 1519 4314 0 1520 1853 1520 1853 0 1521 5894 1521 5894 0 1522 1169 1522 6169 0 1523 2851 1523 2851 0 1524 2851 1524 2851 0 1525 7156 1525 7156 0 1526 2612 1526 2612 0 1527 880 1527 880 0 1528 371 1528 371 0 1529 7515 1529 7515 0 1530 0 1530 0 0 1531 5443 1531 5443 0 1532 0 1532 0 0 REVISED SUBAREA MAXIMUM TAZ TOTAL TAZ TOTAL CHANGE 1534 3323 1534 3323 0 1535 7515 1535 7515 0 1536 4096 1536 4096 0 1537 4096 1537 4096 0 1538 1549 1538 1549 0 1539 2073 1539 2073 0 1540 2436 1540 2436 0 1541 1687 1541 1687 0 1542 11 1542 11 0 1543 792 1543 792 0 1544 4625 1544 4625 0 1545 1225 1545 1225 0 1646 792 1546 792 0 1547 3323 1547 3323 0 1548 3323 1548 3323 0 1549 3323 1549 3323 0 1550 1679 1650 1679 0 1551 811 1551 811 0 1552 0 1552 0 0 1553 1206 1553 1206 0 1554 939 1554 939 0 1555 939 1555 939 0 1556 6858 1556 2311 -4547 1557 968 1557 968 0 155E 7643 1558 6200 -1443 1559 6792 1559 8318 1526 1618 541 1618 54 0 1713 6010 1713 6010 0 1714 3824 1714 3824' 0 1715 3154 1715 3864 710 1716 2665 1716 3375 710 U:\UcJobs\ 01200\01232\TGcalc\LandUseAltsTGCom are\LuForModell ri Ch Com are.xls Com areSubMa 2(0 APPENDIX AA SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS 1. Bluff & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum in SBL SBT SBR EBL BT EBR LANES CAPACITY 1 1600 0 0 200 1600 1 3 4800 0 0 3 4800 1 1600 AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 10 .006* 10 .006* 10 .013 10 .013 10 10 210 210 .163* .169* 250 260 220 .138 290 .181* 5280 1.102* 2050 .429 10 10 10 .006* 10 .006 1190 .248 4430 .923* 190 .119 340 .213 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 2. Superior & Placentia Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY NBT 2 3200 NBR 1 1600 3200 SBT 2 SBR d 1600 EBT 3200 2 EBR d 1600 WBL 0. WBT 1.5 3200 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment 1.277 1.279 AM PK HOUR VOL V/C 400 .250' 1530 * 0 .038 480 .150 10 .006 540 .169* 310 .194 470 .181 80 EBR .025* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION AQ3 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 280 .175* 700 50 .031 .050 80 108800 0 38 .3* 10 .006 10 .006* 370 .116 480 .300 5100 .241* 230 EBR .072* 722 .832 3. Superior & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY NBL NBT 1.5 4800 NBR 0 SBL 1.5 SBT 5 4800 SBR 2 3200 EBT 3 4800 EBR d 1600 WBT 4 6400 WBR d 1600 Right Turn Adjustment Note: Assumes NIS Spl Note: Assumes Right - AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL VIC VOL VIC 580 .206* 380 .242* 70 120 180 .077* 410 .128* 230 .072 990 .309 1640 .513 490 .153* 3420 .713* 1430 .298 390 .244 410 - .256 50 .031* 210 .131 830 .130 3110 .486* 200 .125 140 .088 it Phasing Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1.027 1.037 4. Newport & Hospital Subarea Maximum HOIC HVIC LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 1 1600 400 .250 350 .219* NBT 3 4800 2050 .427* 1810 .377 NBR 1 1600 90 .056 70 .044 SBL 1 1600 180 .113* 90 .056 SBT 3 4800 1310 .273 2330 .485* SBR d 1600 470 .294 260 .163 EBL 2 3200 250 .078 460 .144 EBT 1 1600 460 .288* 450 .281* EBR 1 1600 190 .119 280 .175 WBL 1 1600 160 .100* 310 .194* 3200 4i0 .128 290 .097 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .004* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .932 1.179 Anq 5. Newport & Via Lido Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 3 4800 2160 .450* 1450 .302* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 40 .025 SBL 2 3200 430 .134* 570 .178* SBT 3 4800 1050 .219 2170 .452 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 1 16QO 30 .019* 70 .044* WBR 2 3200 490 .153 660 .206 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .603 .524 6. Newport & 32nd Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019* 100 .063* NBT 3 4800 1300 .271 960 .200 NBR d 1600 40 .025 40 .025 SBL 1 1600 60 .038 80 .050 SBT 2 3200 960 .334* 1680 .625* SBR 0 0 110 320 EBL 1.5 490 180 EBT 0.5 3200 80 .178* 80 OB1* EBR 1 1600 30 .019 20 .013 WBL 0.5 60 .038* 40 WBT 3200 .025 .038* WBR f.5 2340 0 280 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .569 .807 *S 7. Riverside & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C 10 NBT 1 1600 10 .013* .019* NBR d 1600 0 .000 10 .006 SBL 0.5 110 {.069)* 80 {050}* SBT 0.5 1600 10 .075 10 .656 SBR 1 1600 420 .263 570 .356 EBL 1 1600 460 .288 400 .250* 3200 3050 .956* 2320 0 .728 EBR 0 10 WBL 1 1600 10 .006* 50 .031 WBT 3 4800 1790 .373 3930 .819* WBR 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .049* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 8. Tustin & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum NBT NBR SBT SBR EBT EBR WBL WBR LANES CAPACITY 1 1600 0 0 1 1600 0 0 2 3200 0 0 0 0 1600 1 1.044 1.187 AM PK HV/C PM PK HV/C 10 {.019}* 100 .6136)* 10 0 140 110 10 .106* .131* 40 60 20 .013 130 .081* 3030 .950* 2160 .678 0 0 1820 .379 3390 .706* 110 .069 120 .075 TOTAL, CAPACITY UTILIZATION AUp 1.062 .924 9..MacArthur & Campus Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY 6400 NBT 4 NBR 1 1600 6400 SBT 4 SBR 1 1600 4800 EBT 3 EBR d 1600 4800 WBT 3 WBR f Right Turn Adjustment AM HOUR L VOL 1480 .231* 120 .075 1100 .172 490 .306 870 .272* 1190 .217 119 600025 ' .125* 60 SBR .031* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 10. MacArthur & Birch Subarea Maximum PM HOUR VOL 330 .206* 1120 .075 1440 .225* 950 .594 560 .175* 140 .088 1520 .317* 190 SBR .369* 809 1.292 AM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 NBT 3 4800 1290 .269* NBR 1 1600 120 .075 SBL 1 1600 250 .156* SBT 4 6400 820 .171 SBR 0 0 310 .194 EL EBT 1.5 4800 630 .265* EBR 0 60 WBL 1 1600 60 .038 WBT 3200 340 .097* WBR f Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .787 AA-7 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 190 .119* 100 .038 6 2125 00 .236 1* 310 450 4330 .196* 130 .081 990 .309* 360 11. Von Karman & Campus Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006* NBT 2 3200 970 .303* 680 .213 NBR f 30 20 SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 200 .125 SBT 2 3200 590 .219 1180 .447* SBR 0 0 110 250 EBL 1 1600 350 .219* 250 .156* EBT 2 3200 790 .247 1110 .347 EBR 1 1600 50 .031 60 .038 WBL 1 1600 50 .031 40 .025 3200 540 .191* 1140 .413* WBR 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 12. MacArthur & Von Karman .744 1.022 Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 160 .100 60 .038* NBT 3 4800 1470 .306* 940 .196 NBR 1 1600 510 .319 200 .125 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 110 .069 SBT 3 4800 600 .125 1230 .256* SBR 1 1600 190 .119 110 .069 EBL 1 1600 40 .025* 160 .100 EBT 2 3200 160 .050 300 .094* EBR f 40 130 WBL 2 3200 190 .059 850 .266* WBT f 1600 220 .138* 210 .131 WBR 100 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .013* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .520 .654 E,V 13. Jamboree & Campus Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY 6400 NBT 4 NBR 0 0 4800 SST 3 - SBR 0 0 EBL 2 3200 EBT 2 3200 EBR f 3200 WBT 2 WBR 1 1600 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 60 .038 100 ..063* 2260 416* 1830 ..383 680 .213* 390 .122 1500 .390 2790 .665* 40 390 .122* 680 .213* 270 .084 800 .250 20 80 700 .219 390 .122 720 .225* 650 .203* 160 .100 500 .313 WBR .110* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 14. Jamboree & Birch Subarea Maximum .976 1.Zb4 AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 390 .244* 180 .113* NBR 4800 2180 .469 1800 .385 0 SBL 1 1600 10 .006 100 .063 6400 1840 .288* 2240 .350* SBR f EBL 1.5 360 650 EBR 3200 1Z0 .153* .219* f.5 350 1600 .188* 150 .131* WBR 0 160 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 873 813 is 15. Campus & Bristol (N) Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY NBT 3 4800 NBR 0 0 SBT 4 6400 SBR 2 3200 EBL 0 0 EBT EBR 0 0 6400 WBT 4 WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK'HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 510 .159 580 .181* 3250 .677* 1650 .344 0 0 470 .073 1950 .305* 330 .103 1260 .394 0 0 0 0 0 0 340 .106 480 .150 1340 .325* 3040 .502* SBR .089* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1.002 1.077 16. Birch & Bristol (N) Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY NBT 2 3200 NBR 0 0 SBT 1.5 6400 SBR 2.5 EBL 0 0 EBT EBR 0 0 WBL WBT 3.5 8000 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL- V/C 120 .038 170 .053* 1310 .409* 530 .166 0 0 .088 .363* 300 1780 0 0 0 0 1640 .342* 1810 .308* 800 .500 120 WBR .158* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Apo .909 .724 17. Campus/Irvine & Bristol (S) Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 5 8000 2440 .359* 1780 .278* NBR 0 0 430 440 SBL 1 1600 100 .063* 320 .200* 4800 720 .150 2100 .438 SBR 0 EBL 1.5 1330 {.503}* 460 288 EBT 2.5 6400 1890 .503 1410 .294* EBR 2 3200 640 .200 600 .188 0 WBR 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 18. Birch & Bristol (S) 925 //z Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 2.5 6400 560 .152* 290 .091 NBR 1.5 410 380 .119 SBL 2 3200 230 .072* 400 .125 3200 420 .131 910 .284* SBR p EBL 1.5 880 {.3091* 350 EBBT 3.5 8000 14180 .309 1570 .255* R WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION PM .533 539 19. Irvine & Mesa Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 100 .063 50 .031* NBT 3 4800 1970 .410* 980 .204 NBR 1 1600 680 .425 220 .138 SBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 SBT 3 4800 1080 .225 2230 .465* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 200 .125 EBL 1 1600 380 .238* 110 .069* EBT 2 3200 350 .109 90 .028 EBR 1 1600 40 .025 230 .144 WBL 2 3200 170 .053 460 .144 WBT 1 1600 90 .063* 590 .375* WBR 0 0 10 10 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .015* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 20. Irvine & University .732 .940 Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 200 .125 200 .125* NBT 2 3200 2500 .781* 1130 .353 NBR 1 1600 60 .038 30 .019 SBL 1 1600 90 .056* 40 .025 SBT 2 3200 1030 .322 2680 .838* SBR 1 1600 160 .100 420 .263 EBL 1 1600 460 .288* 260 .163* EBT 2 3200 120 .038 30 .009 EBR d 1600 250 .156 140 .088 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBT 1 1600 30 .019* 90 .056* WBR d 1600 20 .013 50 .031 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1.144 1.182 I 21. Irvine & Santiago Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY NBT 2 3200 NBR 0 0 3200 SBT 2 SBR d 1600 EBT 11 1600 EBR d 1600 WBL 01 WBT 1600 WBR d 1600 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR VOL V/C 1550 .488* 10 1010 .316 50 .031 150 {.130}* 130 .081 20 160 .1100 WBR .044* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 22. Irvine & Highland Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY 1 1600 NBT 2 3200 NBR d 1600 00 SBT 2 3200 SBR d 1600 EBT 11 1600 EBR d 1600 WBL 01 WBT 1600 WBR d 1600 Right Turn Adjustment .713 AM VOL HVUC 1660 .519* 10 .006 1230 .384 20 .013 110 .056 120 .075 20 60 .038 Multi .013* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION RN3 626 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 130 .081* 1120 .369 1820 .569* 120 .075 800 .6887}* 160 .100 10 120 * 70 .044 ►.: PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 100 .063* 1410 .441 20 .013 20 538 172200 7.* 70 .044 20 .0252,}*i 80 .050 10 3025* 0 . 100 006 EBR .019* 657 23. Irvine & Dover Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 NBT 2 3200 1320 .413* 1110 .347* NBR d 1600 20 .013 20 .013 SBL 1 1600 200 .125* 270 .169* SBT 2 3200 1000 .313 1440 .450 SBR d 1600 10 .006 50 .031 EBL 1 1600 90 .056 40 .025* EBT 1 1600 190 .163* 130 .156 EBR 0 0 70 120 WBL 1 1600 20 .013* 40 .025 WBT 1 1600 150 .094 260 .163* WBR 1 1600 360 .225 280 .175 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .105* WBR .012* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 24. Irvine & Westcliff W. 716 Subarea Maximum HV/C HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 2 3200 100 .031 290 .091* NBT 2 3200 1000 .313* 710 .222 NBR d 1600 20 .013 10 .006 SBL 2 3200 330 .103* 140 .044 SBT 2 3200 700 .219 910 .284* SBR d 1600 220 .138 470 .294 EBL 2 3200 420 .131* 380 .119* EBT 2 3200 460 .175 570 .238 EBR 0 0 100 190 WBL 1 1600 30 .019 90 .056 WBT 2 3200 430 .150* 960 .325* WBR 0 0 50 80 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .010* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Wq .697 RM 25. Dover & Westcliff Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 300 .094* 930 .291* 3200, 460 .144 700 .219 NBR 0 SBL 0 BT 1 1600 470 .294* 400 .250* SBR 1 1600 60 .038 30 .019 3200 80 .025* 160 .050* EBT 0 EBR f 670 980 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 26. Dover & 16th .413 .591 Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 110, .069* 240 .150* NBT 2 3200 800 .250 1370 .428 NBR d 1600 20 .013 60 .038 SBL 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 SBT 2 3200 1210 .378* 1030 .322* SBR d 1600 30 .019 50 .031 30 EBT 0.5 1600 10 .013* .031* EBR d 1600 270 .169 230 .144 WBL 1 1600 40 .025* 40 .025* WBT 1 1600 10 .006 30 .019 WBR 1 1600 50 .031 50 .031 Right Turn Adjustment EBR .156* EBR .113* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION W15 .641 27. Dover & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 20 .013 NBT 1 1600 70 .044* 80 .050* NBR 1 1600 50 .031 30 .019 SBL 3 4800 910 .190* 1140 .238* SBT 1 1600 60 .038 70 .044 SBR 1 1600 80 .050 140 .088 EBL 2 3200 70 .022 70 .022* EBT 3 4800 2920 .617* 2350 .494 EBR 0 0 40 20 WBL 1 1600 60 .038* 100 .063 WBT 3 4800 1920 .400 3010 .627* WBR f 730 1570 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 28. Bayside & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum 889 .937 AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2.5 490 600 NBT 0.5 4800 20 .108* 20 .135* NBR 0 10 30 SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 160 .100* SBT 1 1600 20 .013 30 .019 SBR d 1600 60 .038 140 .088 EBL 1 1600 110 .069 150 .094* EBT 3 4800 3180 .663* 2550 .531 EBR 1 1600 610 .381 790 .494 WBL 1 1600 50 .031* 20 .013 WBT 4 6400 2060 .339 4010 .648* WBR 0 0 110 140 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .007* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Nw1 840 .977 29. MacArthur & Jamboree Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY 4800 NBT 3 NBR 1 1600 200 4800 SBT 3 SBR f 4800 EBT 3 EBR f 4800 WBT 3 WBR f Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 150 .047 200 .063* 1940 .404* 880 .183 590 .369 600 .375 130 .041* 280 .088 530 .110 14780 .348* 130 620 .194 200 .063 1800 .375* 1520 .317* 120 50 460 .144* 950 .297* 1140 .238 1580 .329 180 170 NBR .052* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .964 1.077 30. Jamboree & Bristol (N) Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY NBT 3 4800 NBR 0 0 SBL SBT 2.5 6400 SBR 1.5 EBL 0 0 EBT EBR 0 0 WBT 0 0 WBR 0 0 AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL. V/C 1200 .375 1120 .350* 3330 .694* 2600 .542 0 0 730 .222 1870 .366* 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION All 694 .716 31. Bayview Place & Bristol (S) Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY NBL 0 NBT 0 NBR 2 3200 SBL 01 0 0 SBR 0 EBT 4 6400 EBR 1 1600 WBL 0 WBT 0 WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 0 0 80 .025 370 .116 0 0 0 0 0 0 3710 .580* 3380 .528* 120 .075 10 .006 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR 025* NBR .116* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 32. Jamboree & Bristol (S) .605 .644 Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 5 8000 2300 .294* 2660 .345* NBR 0 0 50 100 SBT 3 4800 700 .146 1490 310 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 1.5 2070 .647* 1060 (.527)* EBT 1.5 4800 620 .388 1470 .527 EBR 2 3200 1100 .344 1200 .375 WBL 0 0 0 WBT 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Wq .941 ;F 33. Jamboree & Bayview Way Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY 6400 NBT 4 NBR 0 0 6400 SBT 4 SBR 1 1600 1600 EBT 1 EBR 1 1600 1600 WBT 1 WBR 1 1600 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 150 .094 70 .044 21770 .353* 25660 .413* 90 80 100 .063* 140 .088* 1550 .242 2490 .389 180 .113 80 .050 40 .013* 90 .028 40 .025 170 .1106 20 .013 50 .031* 50 .031 130 .081 Multi .044* Multi .172* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 34. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Univ. 479 710 Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 NBT 3 4800 1650 .344* 2100 .438* NBR 1 1600 210 .131 310 .194 SBL 2 3200 90 .028* 330 .103* SBT 3 4800 1250 .260 2010 .419 SBR 1 1600 280 .175 380 .238 EBL 1.5 500 210 EBT 0.5 3200 120 .194* 100 .097* EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 1.5 280 .088* 230 WBR 4800 300 .063 120 .073* f.5 380 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION AW .654 711 35. Jamboree & Bison Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 3 4800 1640 .342* 2070 .431* NBR d 1600 380 .238 180 .113 SBL 2 3200 90 .028* 160 .050* SBT 3 4800 1450 .302 1840 .383 SBR 1 1600 50 .031 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 110 .069* 40 .025* EBR 1 1600 80 .050 20 .013 WBL 2 3200 260 .081* 370 .116* WBR 2 3200 220 .069 190 .059 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 36. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Ford Subarea Maximum 520 622 AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 380 .119* 400 .125* NBT 3 4800 1810 .429 2170 .535 NBR 0 0 250 400 SBL 2 3200 60 .019 60 ..019 SBT 3 4800 1840 .383* 2230 .465* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 170 .106 50 .031 EBT 1 1600 210 .131* 120 .075* EBR f 430 380 WBL 1.5 360 290 WBT 1.5 4800 510 .181* 150 .092* WBR 1 1600 80 .050 20 .013 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION W-0 814 .757 J 37. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 80 .050 4800 1560 .325* 21110 .440* NBR f 80 SBL 2 3200 640 .200* 470 .147* SBT 3 4800 1780 .371 2490 .519 SBR 1 1600 40 .025 200 .125 EBL 1.5 270 .084* 90 .028* EBT 1.5 4800 50 .031 30 .019 EBR 1 1600 60 .038 40 .025 WBL 2 3200 90 .028* 290 .091* WBT 1 1600 .006 .031 WBR 310 750 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 38. Jamboree & Santa Barbara 637 .706 Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 3 4800 1750 .365* 1920 .400* NBR 1 1600 170 .106 100 .063 SBL 2 3200 530 .166* 410 .128* SBT 3 4800 1330 .277 2060 .429 SBR 1 1600 10 .006 30 .019 EBL 1 1600 60 .038* 20 .013 EBT 1 1600 10 .025 10 .013* EBR 0 0 30 10 WBL 1.5 80 510 WBT 0.5 3200 10 .028* 10 .163* WBR 1 1600 190 .119 530 .331 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .091* WBR .168* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION AA.I 872 u 39. Jamboree & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 30 .019 NBT 2 3200 630 .241* 430 .163* NBR 0 0 140 90 SBL 1 1600 210 131* 220 .138* SBT 2 3200 280 .088 750 .234 SBR f 970 2210 EBL 3 4800 1320 .275* 900 .188* 64000 23200 .364 19100 .305 EBR 0 WBL 2 3200 130 .041 330 .103 WBT 4 6400 1510 .236* 2720 .425* WBR f 100 160 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 40. Santa Cruz & San Joaquin H. 179 914 Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 100 .031* 400 .125 NBT 1 1600 10 .031 10 .163* NBR 0 0 40 250 SBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006* SBT 1 1600 10 .006* 10 006 SBR 1 1600 80 .050 60 .038 EBL 1 1600 60 .038 100 .063* EBT 3 4800 510 .159* 410 .123 EBR 0 0 260 .163 180 WBL 1 1600 240 .150* 40 .025 WBT 3 4800 300 .069 560 .123* WBR 0 0 30 30 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .048* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .394 .355 AA7:2-- 41. Santa Rosa & San Joaquin H. Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 200 .125* NBT 1 1600 10 .006* 30 .019 NBR 1 1600 230 .144 ' 780 .488 SBL 1 1600 120 .075* 110 .069 SBT 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006* SBR 1 1600 20 .013 40 .025 EBL 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 EBT 3 4800 330 .094* 630 .158* EBR 0 0 120 130 WBL 2 3200 820 .256* 530 .166* 4800 510 .129 2690 .073 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .279* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 42. Newport Center & Coast Hw. 431 734 Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 0 0 0 0 NBR 3200 30 .009* 310 .097* SBT 0 SBR f 130 980 EBL 2 3200 730 .228* 450 .141* EBT 3 4800 1940 .404 1790 .373 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBT 3 4800 1520 .317* 2000 .417* WBR f 190 170 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION RPV3 554 655 44. Avocado & San Miguel Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 140 .088 70 .044* NBT 1 1600 200 .125* 40 .025 NBR 1 1600 90 .056 610 .381 SBL 1 1600 50 _031* 240 .150 SBT 1 1600 70 .044 230 .144* SBR 1 1600 30 .019 10 .006 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 EBT 2 3200 180 .066 850 .306* EBR 0 0 30 130 WBL 2 3200 530 .166 340 .106* WBT 2 3200 620 .272* 740 .253 WBR 0 0 250 70 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .237* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 45. Avocado & Coast Hw. .434 .837 Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 110 .069* 170 .106* NBT 1 1600 50 .031 110 .069 NBR 1 1600 270 .169 160 .100 SBL 1.5 80 .050 390 SBT 0.5 3200 80 .050* 150 .169* SBR 1 1600 40 .025 320 .200 EBL 1 1600 370 .231* 160 .100 EBT 3 4800 1560 .325 1860 .388* EBR d 1600 80 .050 90 .056 WBL 1 1600 160 .100 220 .138* WBT 3 4800 1730 .360* 1750 .365 WBR 1 1600 140 .088 90 056 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .100* SBR .031* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 810 .832 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY NBL 1.5 NBT 0 4800 NBR 1.5 SBL 0 0 SBT SBR 0 0 EBT 2 3200 EBR 0 0 WBT 2 3200 WBR 1 1600 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 250 {.1171* 2770 .084* 310 100 .063 0 0 0 0 10 .006 10 .006* 1140 .356* 560 .175 0 0 110 .034 650 .203* 190 .119 750 .469 WBR .266* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison Subarea Maximum SBT SBR LANES CAPACITY 0 0 0 0 23200 0 f EBT 2 3200 EBR 1 1600 WBT 2 3200 WBR 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .473 AM PK HOUR VOL V/C 0 0 840 .263* 10 0 130 .081 320 .100 0 W-5 382 559 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 0 0 280 .088* 70 0 250 .078 140 .088 280 .088 640 .200* 48, MacArthur & Bison Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES ,CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 350 .109 280 .088* NBT 4 6400 3470 .542* 2830 .442 NBR f 200 140 SBL 2 3200 110 .034* 50 .016 SBT 4 6400 2720 .425 3220 .503* SBR 1 1600 340 .213 450 .281 EBL 2 3200 360 .113* 300 .094* EBT 3200 34800 .106 1800 .056 EBR f WBL 2 3200 190 .059 220 .069 WBT 2 3200 400 .125* 410 .128* WBR 1 1600 130 .081 60 .038 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 49. MacArthur & Ford/Bonita Cyn .814 813 Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 150 .047 80 .025 NBT 4 6400 2050 .320* 2580 .403* NBR f 120 430 SBL 2 3200 600 .188* 1340 .419* 6400 29100 .455 249900 .389 SBR f EBL 2 3200 40 .013 10 .003 EBT 2 3200 400 .125* 590 .184* EBR 1 1600 90 .056 120 .075 WBL 2 3200 490 .153* 260 .081* WBT 2 3200 730 .228 420 .131 WBR f 1630 770 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1► V .786 1.087 50. MacArthur & San Joaquin H. Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 60 .019- 30 .009 NBT 3 4800 1560 .325* 1950 .406* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 20 .013 SBL 2 3200 550 .172* 730 .228* SBT 3 4800 1740 .363 1980 .413 SBR f 1200 570 EBL 2 3200 310 .097* 1030 .322* EBT 3 4800 320 .077 850 .198 EBR 0 0 50 100 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBR 3200 840 .231* 400 .125*430 f TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 51. MacArthur & San Miguel Subarea Maximum 825 1.081 AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 180 .056 190 .059* NBT 3 4800 1500 .313* 990 .206 NBR 1 1600 310 .194 470 .294 SBL 2 3200 10 .003* 10 .003 SBT 3 4800 1030 .215 1490 .310* SBR 1 1600 800 .500 600 .375 EBL 2 3200 100 .031 1020 .319* EBR 3200 150 .069* 560 •228 0 WBL 2 3200 360 .113* 310 .097 WBT 2 3200 390 .122 360 .113* WBR d 1600 20 .013 30 .019 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .209* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .707 AW I 52. MacArthur & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum NBL 0 0 NBR 0 0 3200 SBT 0 SBR f EBT 3 4800 EBR 0 0 WBT 3 4800 I, i AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 0 0 0 0 0 0 550 .172* 800 .250* 0 0 430 810 850 .266* 680 .213* 1050 .219 1620 .338 1470 .306* 1640 .342* 850 660 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .744 .805 53. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bonita Cyn Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY 3200 NBT 0 NBR 1 1600 SBL 0 0 SBT SBR 0 0 EBT 2 3200 EBR 1 1600 WBT 2 3200 WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 570 .178* 80 .025* 410 .256 140 .088 0 0 0 0 0 0 900 .281* 1110 .347* 90 .056 10 .006 580 .181* 350 .109* 1070 .334 1150 .359 NBR .078* NBR .063* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Qz 718 .544 54. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Cyn Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY NB 3200 0 NBR 1 1600 SBL 0 0 SBT 0 0 SBR EBT 2 3200 EBR 1 1600 4800 WBT 3 WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 40 .013* 270 .084* 240 .150 270 .169 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 720 .225 830 .259* 190 .119 590 .369 190 .059 200 .063* 1470 .306* 1030 .215 NBR .137* Multi .195* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 55. Spyglass Hill & San Miguel .456 bul Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 40 30 {.0191* NBT 1 1600 40 .050* 20 .031 NBR d 1600 160 .100 180 .113 SBL 0 0 50 {.0311* 20 SBT 1 1600 30 .050 30 .031* SBR 1 1600 40 .025 30 .019 EBL 1 1600 50 .031* 70 .044 EBT 2 3200 340 .106 580 .181* EBR d 1600 30 .019 60 .038 WBL 1 1600 110 .069 140 .088* WBT 2 3200 460 .144* 490 .153 WBR d 1600 30 .019 40 .025 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .050* NBR .075* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .306 .394 AA2q 56. San Miguel & San Joaquin H. Subarea Maximum qqM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL' V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 2 3200 280 .134* 580 .309* NBR 0 0 150 410 SBL 1 1600 70 .044* 140 .088* SBT 2 3200 490 .153 390 .122 SBR 1 1600 450 .281 160 .100 EBL 2 3200 300 .094* 570 .178* 4800 580 .123 850 .179 EBR 0 10 10 WBL 2 3200 480 .150 270 .084 WBT 3 4800 1150 .256* 600 .138* WBR 0 0 80 60 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .015* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 57. Goldenrod & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum .543 .713 AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 140 .088* 80 .050* 1600 .025 30 .025 NBT 0 30 SBL 0 0 60 40 SBT 1 1600 10 .094* 10 .056* SBR 0 0 80 40 EBL 1 1600 30 .019* 40 .025 EBT 2 3200 1210 .378 2070 .647* EBR d 1600 40 .025 80 .050 WBL 1 1600 40 .025 30 .019* WBT 2 3200 2800 .875* 1840 .575 WBR d 1600 20 .013 20 .013 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1.076 .772 AA3o 58. Marguerite & San Joaquin H. Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 260 180 NBT 0.5 3200 50 .097* 60 .075* NBR 1 1600 30 .019 70 .044 SBL 1 1600 60 .038 80 .050 1600 30 .044* 40 .056* SBR 1 EBL 1 1600 20 .013* 40 .025 EBT 2 3200 450 .141 1020 .319* EBR 1 1600 120 .075 310 .194 WBL 1 1600 40 .025 120 .075* WBT 3 4800 1120 .233* 680 .142 WBR d 1600 90 .056 40 .025 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 59. Marguerite & Coast Hw. .387 5L5 Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 150 .094* 160 .100* NBT 1 1600 100 .113 120 .125 NBR 0 0 80 80 SBL 1 1600 70 .044 110 .069 SBT 1 1600 60 .106* 120 .125* SBR 0 0 110 80 EBL 1 1600 90 .056* 100 .063 EBT 2 3200 1350 .422 1980 .619* EBR 1 1600 60 .038 120 .075 WBL 1 1600 50 .031 110 .069* 3200 2020 .647* 16040 .513 WBWBT 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION AA31 903 913 60. Spyglass H. & San Joaquin H. Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 NBT 1 1600 0 .013* 10 .025* NBR 0 0 20 30 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 40 .025* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR d 1600 280 .175 160 .100 ,EBL 1 1600 80 . .050* 270 .169* EBT 2 3200 650 .203 1040 .325 EBR 1 1600 20 .013 60 .038 WBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 2 3200 1150 .359* 640 .200* WBR d 1600 70 .044 70 .044 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .162* SBR .081* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 61. Poppy &'Coast Hw. .622 .500 Subarea Maximum HOUR HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLK NBL 1 1600 20 .013* 30 .019 NBT 1600 .019 110 .044* NBR 0 20 60 SBL 0 0 50 120 {.075 1600 .044* 10 .088 SBR 0 10 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 20 .013 EBT 2 3200 1370 .431 1940 .609* EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013* 3200 1940 .616* 1680 .53120 WBR 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION AN3z. .679 .741 62. Newport Coast & SR-73 NB Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 2 3200 1310 .409* 810 .253 NBR f 510 270 SBT 2 3200 440 .138 970 .303* SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 1.5 340 300 WBT 0 3200 0 .138* 0 .103* WBR 0.5 100 30 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .547 .406 64. Newport Coast & San Joaquin Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 120 .038 140 .044* NBT 3 4800 1520 .317* 730 .152 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBT 3 4800 780 .163 1130 .235* SBR 1 1600 170 .106 400 .250 EBL 1 1600 540 .338* 340 .213* EBR 2 3200 90 .028 100 .031 WBL 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .015* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .655 .507 R33 65. Newport Coast & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBL 2 3200 310 .097* 830 .259* SBT 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBR f 210 220 EBL 1 1600 260 .163* 140 .086* EBT 3 4800 950 .198 1620 .338 EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 3 4800 1450 .302* 1250 .260* WBR f 790 350 Note; Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION NKM .56B .613 APPENDIX BB SUBAREA MAXIMUM GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS WITH IMPROVEMENTS 1. Bluff & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 1 1600 10 .013* 10 .013* NBR 0 0 10 10 SBL 2 3200 290 .091* 250 .078 SBT 0.5 3200 10 .081 10 .084* SBR 1.5 250 260 EBL 2 3200 220 .069 290 .091* EBT 5 8000 5280 .661* 2050 .258 EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 WBT 4 6400 1190 .186 4430 .692* WBR 1 1600 190 .119 340 .213 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 2. Superior & Placentia Subarea Maximum LANES CAPACITY 3200 NBT 2 NBR 1 1600 600 3200 SBT 2 SBR d 1600 3200 EBT 2 EBR d 1600 WBL WBT 1.5 3200 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment .771 AM PK HOUR VOL V/C 400 .250 1560 .038* 480 .150 10 .006 540 .169* 310 .194 470 .181 80 EBR .025* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION BB3 .722 ::1 PM HOUR L VOL 280 .175* 750 .031 80 108800 0 338 .* 10 .006 10 .006* 480 .300 100 5 .241* 230 EBR .072* 'I 5. Newport & Via Lido Subarea Maximum With Improvements HV/C HV/C LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBT 3 4800 2160 .450* 1450 .302* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 40 .025 SBL 2 3200 430 .134* 570 .178* SBT 3 4800 1050 .219 2170 .452 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 EBT EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 1 1600 30 .019* 70 .044* WBR 2 3200 490 .153 660 .206 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 6. Newport & 32nd .603 .524 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019* 100 .063* NBT 3 4800 1300 .271 960 .200 NBR d 1600 40 .025 40 .025 SBL 1 1600 60 .038 80 .050 SBT 2 3200 960 .300* 1680 .525* SBR 1 1600 110 .069 320 .200 EBL 1.5 490 180 EBT 0.5 3200 80 .178* 80 .081* EBR 1 1600 30 .019 20 .013 WBL 0.5 60 .038* 40 WBTWBR 1.5 3200 .025 .038* 240 280 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .535 707 Im n u L! r 5. Newport & Via Lido Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 3 4800 2160 .450* 1450 .302* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 40 .025 SBL 2 3200 430 .134* 570 .178* SBT 3 4800 1050 .219 2170 .452 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 WBL 1 1600 30 .019* 70 .044* WBR 2 3200 490 .153 660 .206 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 6. Newport & 32nd 603 524 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 100 .063 NBT 3 4800 1300 .271* 960 .200* NBR d 1600 40 .025 40 .025 SBL 1 1600 60 .038 80 .050 SBT 2 3200 960 .300* 1680 .525* SBR. 1 1600 110 .069 320 .200 EBL 1.5 490 180 EBT 0.5 3200 80 .178* 80 .081* EBR 1 1600 30 .019 20 .013 WBL 0.5 60 .038* 40 WBR 3200 .025 .038* f.5 230 280 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .787 .844 M I 7. Riverside & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL, V/C VOL V/C NBL 01 10 NBT 1600 .013* 10 .019* NBR d 1600 0 .000 10 .006 SBL 0.5 110 (.069)* 80 10501,* SBT 0.5 1600 10 .075 10 .656 SBR f 420 570 EBL 2 3200 460 .144 400 .125* EBT 3 4800 3050 .638* 2310 .485 EBR 0 0 10 20 WBL 1 1600 10 .006* 50 .031 WBT 4 6400 1790 .289 3930 .622* WBR 0 0 60 50 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 8. Tustin & Coast Hw. .726 .816 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 10 (.006)* 10 1006}* NBT 1 1600 10 .019 10 .613 NBR 0 0 10 0 SBL 0 0 120 140 SBT 1600 40 .106* 110 .131* SBR 0 60 EBL 1 1600 20 .013 130 .081* 4800 3030 .633* 2160 .452 EBR 0 10 0 WBT 4 64010 1820 .284 3390 .530* WBR 1 1600 110 .069 120 .075 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 345 .748 9. MacArthur & Campus Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 170 .053 330 .103* NBT 4 6400 1480 .231* 1470 .230 NBR 1 1600 120 .075 120 .075 SBL 1 1600 240 .150* 150 .094 4 6400 1100 .172 1440 .225* SBR EBL 2 3200 870 .272* 560 .175* EBT 3 4800 1040 .217 670 .140 EBR d 1600 190 .119 140 .088 WBL 2 3200 80 .025 160 .050 4800 6060 .125* 1520 .317* WBR f 190 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 10. MacArthur & Birch .778 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 190 .119* NBT 3 4800 1290 .269* 1040 .217 NBR 1 1600 120 .075 60 .038 SBL 1 1600 250 .156* 200 .125 SBT 4 6400 820 .171 1200 .236* SBR 0 0 310 .194 310 EBL 1.5 580 450 EBR 1.5 4800 6360 .265* 4330 .196* 0 60 WBL 1 1600 60 .038 130 .081 WBT 2 3200 340 097* 990 .309* WBR 360 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION' .787 J :.P 11. Von Karman & Campus Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006* 2 3200 970 .303* 680 .213 NBR SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 200 .125 SBT 2 3200 590 .184 1180 .369* SBR 1 1600 110 .069 250 .156 EBL 1 1600 350 .219* 250 .156* EBT 2 3200 790 .247 1110 .347 EBR 1 1600 50 .031 60 .038 WBL 1 1600 '50 .031 40 .025 WBT 2 3200 540 .169* 1180 .369* WBR 1 1600 70 .044 140 .088 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 12. MacArthur & Von Karman .722 .900 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 160 .100 60 .038* NBT 3 4800 1470 .306* 940 .196 NBR 1 1600 510 .319 200 .125 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 110 .069 SBT 3 4800 600 .125 1230 .256* SBR 1 1600 190 .119 110 .069 EBL 1 1600 40 .025* 160 .100 EBT 3200 160 .050 300 .094* EBR p 13 WBL 2 3200 190 .059 850 .266* 1600 2260 .138* 210 .131 WBR f 0 100 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .013* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ME 520 .654 13. Jamboree & Campus Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 100 .063* 6400 2400 .375* 1840 .288 NBR f 73 SBL 2 3200 680 .213* 390 .122 6400 1500 .234 2790 .436* SBR f EBL 3 4800 390 .081* 680 .142 EBT 3200 270 .084 8080 .250* EBR f WBL 2 3200 700 .219 390 .122* 3200 720 .225* 650 .203Soo WBR f TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 14. Jamboree & Birch 894 .871 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 390 .244* 180 .113* NBR 4800 2180 .469 1850 .385 0 SBL 1 1600 10 .006 100 .063 6400 1840 •288* 2240 .350* SBR f EBL 1.5 360 650 EBT 0.5 3200 130 .153* 50 .219* EBR f 20 320 WBT 1600 .188* 150 .131* 0 160 10 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 873 .813 15. Campus & Bristol (N) Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 510 J59 580 .181* 4800 3250 .677* 1650 .344 NBR 0 SBT 4.5 11200 470 .071 1950 .287* SBR 2.5 330 1260 0 0 0 0 EBR WBL 2 3200 340 .106 480 .150 WBT 5 8000 1740 .218* 3070 .384* WBR 1 1600 340 .213 140 .088 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .895 .852 16. Birch•& Bristol (N) Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 120 .038 170 .053* 3200 1310 .409* 530 .166 NBR 0 SBT 1.5 6400 200 .088 780 .363* SBR 2.5 360 1540 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 1.5 450 530 3.5 8000 166440 .261* 1820 .293* WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .670 .709 �� 1 17. Campus/Irvine & Bristol (S) Subarea Maximum With Improvements LANES CAPACITY NBT 5 8000 NBR 1 1600 4800 SBT 3 SBR 0 0 EBT 2.5 6400 EBR 2 3200 WBL 0 0 0 0 WBR Right Turn Adjustment VOL V/C VOL V/C 2440 .305* 1780 .223 430 .269 440 .275 100 .063* 320 .200 720 .150 2100 .438* 1330 (.503)* 460 288 1890 .503 1410 .294* 640 .200 600 .188 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR .037* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 18. Birch & Bristol (S) 871 .769 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL NBT 2.5 6400 560 .152* 290 .091 NBR 1.5 410 380 .119 SBL 2 3200 230 .072* 400 .125 3200 420 .131 910 .284* SBT 0 EBL 1.5 880 (.309)* 350 3.5 8000 1180 .309 1570 .255* EBR 12 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ME .533 .539 I 19. Irvine & Mesa Subarea Maximum With Improvements HV/C HVUC LANES CAPACITY VOLPK VOLPK NBL 1 1600 100 .063 50 .031* NBT 3 4800 1970 .410* 980 .204 NBR 1 1600 680 .425 220 .138 SBL 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 SBT 3 4800 1080 .225 2230 .465* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 '200 .125 EBL 1 1600 380 .238* 110 .069* EBT 2 3200 350 .109 90 .028 EBR 1 1600 40 .025 230 .144 WBL 1.5 170 460 WBT 1.5 4800 90 .056* 590 .221* WBR 0 10 10 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .015* EBR .075* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 20. Irvine & University .725 .861 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 200 .125 200 .125* NBT 3 4800 2500 .521* 1130 .235 NBR 1 1600 60 .038 30 019 SBL 1 1600 90 .056* 40 .025 SBT 3 4800 1030 .215 2680 .558* SBR 1 1600 160 .100 420 .263 EBL 1.5 460 .144* 260 .081* EBT 1.5 4800 120 .075 30 .019 EBR d 1600 250 156 140 .088 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 WBT 1 1600 30 .019* 90 .056* WBR d 1600 20 .013 50 .031 Right Turn Adjustment EBR .012* EBR .007* Note; Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 752 .827 11 21. Irvine & Santiago Subarea Maximum With Improvements LANES CAPACITY 3200 NBT 2 NBR 0 0 SBT 2 3200 SBR d 1600 EBT 1 1600 EBR d 1600 WBT 1 1600 WBR d 1600 Right Turn Adjustment VOL V/C 110 .0 1550 .488* 10 1010 .316 50 .031 150 {.131}* 130 .081 20 160 .100 WBR .044* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 22. Irvine & Highland Subarea Maximum With Improvements LANES CAPACITY 3200 NBT 2 NBR d 1600 3200 SBT 2 SBR d 1600 EBT 1 1600 EBR d 1600 WBL WBT 1 1600 WBR d 1600 Right Turn Adjustment PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 130 .081* 1120 .369 120 .075 1820 .076* 800 .6887}* 160 .100 10 120 * 70 .044 713 .768 VOL V/C 9056 1660 .519* 10 .006 1230 .384 20 .013 80 .056 120 .075 20 60 031* .038 Multi .013* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION WE 626 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 100 .063* 1410 441 20 .013 20 .013 1720 .538* 70 .044 200 .6252}* 80 .050 10 10 .006 EBR .019* 657 23. Irvine & Dover Subarea Maximum With Improvements LANES CAPACITY 3200 NBT 2 NBR d 1600 3200 SBT 2 SBR d 1600 EBT 1 1600 EBR 0 0 1600 WBT 1 WBR 1 1600 Right Turn Adjustment VOL V/C 025 .413* 1320 20 .013 200 .125* 1010 .313 006 .163* 190 70 150 .094 360 .225 WBR .105* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 24. Irvine & Westcliff PM PK HOUR VOL V/C .031 1110 .347* 20 .013 270 .169* 1440 450 50 .031 40 .025* 130 .156 12 025 .163* 260 280 .175 WBR .012* 819 .716 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 100 .031 NBT 2 3200 1000 .313* NBR d 1600 20 .013 SBL 2 3200 330 .103* SBT 2 3200 700 .219 SBR d 1600 220 .138 EBL 2 3200 420 .131* EBT 2 3200 460 .175 EBR 0 0 100 WBL 1 1600 30 .019 3200 450 .150* WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .697 PM PK HOUR VOL V/C 290 .091* 710 .006 140 .044 910 .284* 470 .294 380 .119* 570 .238 19 60 .325 9* 80 SBR 010* .829 25. Dover & Westcliff Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 300 .094* 930 .291* NBT 2 3200 460 .144 700 .219 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBL 01 SBT 1600 470 .294* 400 .250* SBR 1 1600, 60 .038 30 .019 2 3200 80 .025* 160 .050* EBT EBR f 670 980 0 WBR 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 26. Dover & 16th .413 .591 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 110 .069* 240 .150* NBT 2 3200 800 .250 1370 .428 NBR d 1600 20 .013 60 .038 SBL 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 SBT 2 3200 1210 .378* 1030 .322* SBR d 1600 30 .019 50 .031 30 EBT 0.5 1600 10 .013* .031* EBR d 1600 270 .169 230 .144 WBL 1 1600 40 .025* 40 .025* WBT 1 1600 10 .006 30 .019 WBR 1 1600 50 .031 50 .031 Right Turn Adjustment EBR .156* EBR .113* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .641 641 I 27. Dover & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL. 1 1600 40 .025 20 .013 NBT 1 1600 70 .044* 80 .050* NBR 1 1600 50 .031 30 .019 SBL 3 4800 910 .190* 1140 .238* SBT 1 1600 60 .038 70 .044 SBR 1 1600 80 .050 140 .088 EBL 2 3200 70 .022 70 .022 EBT 3 4800 2920 .617* 2350 .494* EBR 0 0 40 20 WBL 1 1600 60 .038* 100 .063* WBT 4 6400 1920 .300 3010 .470 WBR f 730 1570 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 28. Bayside & Coast Hw. .889 .845 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2.5 490 .102* 600 .125* NBT 1.5 6400 20 .019 20 .031 NBR 0 10 30 SBL 1.5 50 160 SBT 0.5 3200 20 .022* 30 .059* SBR 1 1600 60 .038 140 .088 EBL 1 1600 110 .069 150 .094* EBT 3 4800 3180 .663* 2550 .531 EBR 1 1600 610 .381 790 .494 WBL 1 1600 50 .031* 20 .013 WBT 5 8000 2060 .258 4010 .501* WBR 1 1600 110 .069 140 .088 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note; Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .818 M .779 I J J 29. MacArthur & Jamboree Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 150 .047 200 .063* NBT 4 6400 1940 .303* 880 .138 NBR 1 1600 590 .369 600 .375 SBL 2 3200 130 .041* 280 .088 SBR 4800 530 .110 16780 .348* f EBL 2 3200 620 .194* 200 .063 6400 1820 .281 1550 .238* EBR f WBL 3 4800 460 .096 950 .198* 4800 1140 •238* 1580 .329 WBR f 170 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .066* NBR .052* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 30. Jamboree & Bristol (N) 842 RM Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 1200 .375 1120 .350* 4800 3330 .694* 2600 .542 NBR 0 SBL SBT 2.5 ,' 6400 730 .222 1470 .366* SBR 1.5 690 870 EBT 0 0 0 0 EBR WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION G917 694 .716 31. Bayview Place & Bristol (S) Subarea Maximum With Improvements LANES CAPACITY NBL 0 0 NBT NBR 2 3200 SBL 0 0 SBT SBR 0 0 EBT 4 6400 EBR 1 1600 WBL 0 0 WBT WBR 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR VOL V/C VOL V/C 0 0 80 .025 370 .116 0 0 0 0 0 0 3710 .580* 3380 .528* 120 .075 10 .006 0 0 0 0 NBR .025* NBR .116* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 32. Jamboree & Bristol (S) b05 .b44 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C 8000 2300 .294* 26600 .345* NBR B 4800 700 .146 1490 .310 SBR 3 EBL 2.5 2070 .431* 1060 .331 EBT 1.5 6400 620 .388 1470 .459* EBR 2 3200 1100 .344 1200 .375 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION BE .725 .804 33. Jamboree & Bayview Way Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY NBT 4 6400 NBR 0 0 SBT 4 .6400 SBR 1 1600 EBL 3200 EBT 1 1600 EBR 1 1600 1600 WBT 1 WBR 1 1600 Right Turn Adjustment VOL V/C VOL V/C 150 .094 70 .044 2170 .353* 2560 .413* 90 80 100 .063* 140 .088* 1550 .242 2490 .389 180 .113 80 .050 40 .013* 90 .028 10 .006 10 .006* 40 .025 170 .106 20 .013 50 .031* 10 .006* 10 .006 50 .031 130 .081 Multi .044* Multi .172* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 34. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Univ. 479 710 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 NBT 3 4800 1650 .344* 2100 .438* NBR 1 1600 210 .131 310 .194 SBL 2 3200 90 .028* 330 .103* SBT 3 4800 1250 .260 2010 .419 SBR 1 1600 280 .175 380 .238 EBL 1.5 500 210 EBT 0.5 3200 120 .194* 100 .097* EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 1.5 280 .088* 230 WBT 1.5 4800 100 .063 120 .073* WBR f 390 380 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION R 654 711 11 35. Jamboree & Bison Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 3 4800 1640 .342* 2070 .431* NBR d 1600 380 .238 180 .113 SBL 2 3200 90 .028* 160 .050* SBT 3 4800 1450 .302 1840 .383 SBR 1 1600 50 031 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 110 .069* 40 .025* EBR 1 1600 80 .050 20 .013 WBL 2 8200 260 .081* 370 .116* WBR 2 3200 220 .069 190 .059 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .520 .622 36. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Ford Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 380 .119* 400 .125* NBT 3 4800 1810 .429 2170 .535 NBR 0 0 250 400 SBL 2 3200 60 .019 60 .019 SBT 3 4800 1840 .383* 2230 .465* SBR 1 1600 50 .031 90 .056 EBL 1 1600 170 106 50 .031 EBT 1600 210 .131* 320 .075* EBR f 80 WBL 1.5 360 290 WBT 1.5 4800 510 .181* 150 .092* WBR 1 1600 80 .050 20 .013 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .814 .757 0 37. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 80 .050 4800 1560 .325* 2180 .440* NBR f SBL 2 3200 640 .200* 470 .147* SBT 3 4800 1780 .371 2490 .519 SBR 1 1600 40 .025 200 .125 EBL 1.5 270 .084* 90 .028* 5 40 EBR 1 1600 60 .038 .025 10 250 WBT 1 1600 .006* .031* WBR f 390 700 Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 38. Jamboree & Santa Barbara NO Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL VIC NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 3 4800 1750 .365* 1920 .400* NBR 1 1600 170 .106 100 .063 SBL 2 3200 530 .166* 410 .128* 1310 2030 SBR 1 1600 .006 .019 EBL 1 1600 60 .038* 20 .013 EBT 1 1600 10 .025 10 .013* EBR 0 0 30 10 WBL 1.5 80 510 5 WBR 1 1600 190 .1119* 530 .331* Right Turn Adjustment WBR .091* WBR .168* Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION sa -1 39. Jamboree & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 30 .019 30 .019 NBT 2 3200 630 .197* 430 .134* NBR 1 1600 140 .088 90 .056 SBL 1 1600 210 .131* 220 .138* SBT 2 3200 280 .088 750 .234 SBR f 970 2210 EBL 3 4800 1320 .275* 900 .188* EBR 4 6400 2310 .364 1940 .305 WBL 2 3200 130 .041 330 .103 6400 1510 .236* 2720 .425*160 WBR f TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 40. Santa Cruz & San Joaquin H. .839 .885 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 100 .031* 400 .125 1 1600 .031 .163* NBR 40 210 SBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006* SBT 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006 SBR 1 1600 80 .050 60 .038 EBL 1 1600 60 .038 100 .063* EBT 3 4800 510 .159* 410 .123 EBR 0 0 260 .163 180 WBL 1 1600 240 .150* 40 .025 4800 300 069 560 .123* WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .048* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ggn .394 .355 41. Santa Rosa & San Joaquin H. Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 40 .025 200 .125* NBT 1 1600 10 .006* 30 .019 NBR 1 1600 230 .144 780 .488 SBL 1 1600 120 .075* 110 .069 SBT 1 1600 20 .013 10 .006* SBR 1 1600 20 .013 40 .025 EBL 1 1600 40 .025 50 .031 EBT 3 4800 330 .094* 630 .158* EBR 0 0 120 130 WBL 2 3200 820 .256* 530 .166* WBT 3 4800 510 .129 260 .073 WBR 0 0 110 90 Right Turn Adjustment Multi .279*' Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 42. Newport Center & Coast Hw. .431 734 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 0 0 NBT 0 0 0 0 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBL 2 3200 30 .009* 310 .097* SBT 0 0 0 0 SBR f 130 980 EBL 2 3200 730 .228* 450 .141* EBT 3 4800 1940 .404 1790 .373 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBT 3 4800 1520 .317* 2000 .417* WBR f 190 170 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ON .554 655 11 44. Avocado & San Miguel Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 140 .088 70 .044* NBT 1 1600 200 .125* 40 .025 NBR 1 1600 90 .056 610 .381 SBL 1 1600 50 .031* 240 .150 SBT 1 1600 70 .044 230 .144* SBR 1 1600 30 .019 10 .006 EBL 1 1600 10 ".006* 10 .006 EBT 2 3200 180 .066 850 .306* EBR 0 0 30 130 WBL 2 3200 530 .166 340 .106* WBT 2 3200 620 .272* 740 .253 WBR 0 0 250 70 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .237* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 45. Avocado & Coast Hw. .434 .837 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 110 .069* 170 .106* NBT 1 1600 50 .031 110 .069 NBR 1 1600 270 .169 160 .100 SBL 1.5 80 .050 390 SBT 0.5 3200 80 .050* 150 .169* SBR 1 1600 40 .025 320 .200 EBL 1 1600 370 .231* 160 .100 EBT 3 4800 1560 .325 1860 .388* EBR d 1600 80 .050 90 .056 WBL 1 1600 160 .100 220 .138* WBT 3 4800 1730 .360* 1750 .365 WBR 1 1600 140 .088 90 .056 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .100* SBR .031* Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 810 .832 1 e 46. SR-73 NB Ramps & Bison Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 250 {.117}* 270 .084* NBT 0 4800 0 .117 0 NBR 1.5 310 100 .063 SBL SBT 0 0 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006* EBT 2 3200 1140 .356* 560 .175 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBT 2 3200 110 .034 650 .203* WBR 1 1600 190 .119 750 .469 Right Turn Adjustment WBR .266* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 47. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bison 473 .559 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR SBL 2 3200 840 .263* 280 .088* 0 SBR f 10 70 EBT 2 3200 320 .100* 250 .078 EBR 1 1600 130 .081 140 .088 WBL 2 3200 60 .019* 280 .088 WBT 2 3200 320 .100 640 .200* WBR 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .382 :. 48. MacArthur & Bison Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 350 .109 280 .088* 6400 3470 .542* 2830 .442 NBR f SBL 2 3200 110 .034* 50 .016 SBT 4 6400 2720 .425 3220 .503* SBR 1 1600 340 .213 450 .281 EBL 2 3200 360 .113* 300 .094* EBT 3200 340 .106 180 .056 EBR f 90 WBL 2 3200 190 .059 220 .069 WBT 2 3200 400 .125* 410 .128* WBR 1 1600 130 .081 60 038 Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 49. MacArthur & Ford/Bonita Cyn 814 .813 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 150 .047* 80 .025 6400 2050 .320 2580 .403* NBR f SBL 3 4800 600 .125 1340 .279* SBT 4 6400 2910 .455* 2490 .389 SBR 1 1600 20 .013 60 .038 EBL 1 1600 40 .025* 10 .006 EBT 3 4800 400 .083 590 .123* EBR 1 1600 90 .056 120 .075 WBL 2 3200 490 .153 260 .081* WBT 2 3200 730 .228* 420 .131 WBR f 1630 770 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION M: 755 .886 50. MacArthur & San Joaquin H. Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY- VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 60 .019 30 .009 NBT 4 6400 1560 .244* 1950 .305* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 20 .013 SBL 2 3200 550 .172* 730 .228* SBT 3 4800 1740 .363 1980 .413 SBR f 1200 570 EBL 3 4800 310 .065* 1030 .215* 4800 320 .077 8550 .198 EBR 0 100 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013 3200 .231* 430 .125* WBR f 840 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 51. MacArthur & San Miguel 712 873 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 180 .056 190 .059* NBT 3 4800 1500 .313* 990 .206 NBR 1 1600 310 .194 470 .294 SBL 2 3200 10 .003* 10 .003 SBT 3 4800 1030 .215 1490 .310* SBR 1 1600 800 .500 600 .375 EBL 2 3200 100 .031 1020 .319* EBTEBR 3200 150 .069* 560 •228 0 WBL 2 3200 360 .113* 310 .097 WBT 2 3200 390 .122 360 .113* WBR d 1600 20 .013 30 .019 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .209* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION gBz� 707 52. MacArthur & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 0 0 0 0 NBR 3200 550 .172* 800 .250* SBT 0 SBR f 430 810 EBL 2 3200 850 .266* 680 .213* 4800 1050 .219 1620 .338 EBR 0 WBT 3 4800 1470 .306* 1640 .342* WBR f 850 660 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 53, SR-73 NB Ramps & Bonita Cyn 744 .805 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 570 .178* 80 .025* NBR 1 1600 410 .256 140 .088 SBT 0 0 0 0 SBR EBT 2 3200 900 .281* 1110 .347* EBR 1 1600 90 .056 10 .006 WBL 2 3200 580 .181* 350 .109* 3200 1070 .334 1150 .359 WBR 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .078* NBR .063* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION * 718 544 I I' 54. SR-73 SB Ramps & Bonita Cyn Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C 3200 40 .013* 270 .084* NBT 0 NBR 1 160& 240 .150 270 .169 SBT 0 0 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBT 2 3200 720 .225 830 .259* EBR 1 1600 190 .119 590 .369 WBL 2 3200 190 .059 200 .063* WBT 3 4800 1470 .306* 1030 .215 WBR 0 0 0 0 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .137* Multi .195* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 55. Spyglass Hill & San Miguel .456 601 -Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 0 0 40 30 {.0191* NBT 1 1600 40 .050* 20 .031 NBR d 1600 160 .100 180 .113 SBL 0 0 50 {.0311* 20 SBT 1 1600 30 .050 30 .031* SBR 1 1600 40 .025 30 .019 EBL 1 1600 50 .031* 70 .044 EBT 2 3200 340 .106 580 .181* EBR d 1600 30 .019 60 .038 WBL 1 1600 110 .069 140 .088* WBT 2 3200 460 .144* 490 .153 WBR d 1600 30 .019 40 .025 Right Turn Adjustment NBR .050* NBR .075* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 16g*q 306 394 56. San Miguel & San Joaquin H. Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 2 3200 280 .134* 580 .309* NBR 0 0 150 410 SBL 1 1600 70 .044* 140 .088* SBT 2 3200 490 .153 390 .122 SBR 1 1600 450 .281 160 .100 EBL 2 3200 300 .094* 570 .178* EBT 3 4800 580 .123 850 .179 EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 2 3200 480 .150 270 .084 WBT 3 4800 1150 .256* 600 .138* WBR 0 0 80 60 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .015* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for SBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .543 .713 57. Goldenrod & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 140 .088* 80 .050* NBT 1 1600 10 025 10 .025 NBR 0 0 30 30 10 10 SBT 11 1600 .094* .056* SBR 0 0 80 40 EBL 1 1600 30 .019* 40 .025 EBT 2 3200 1210 .378 2070 .647* EBR d 1600 40 .025 80 .050 WBL 1 1600 40 .025 30 .019* 4800 2800 .588* 18 .388 WBR 0 20 20 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .789 .772 %3D '58. Marguerite & San Joaquin H. Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1.5 260 180 NBT 0.5 3200 50 .097* 60 .075* NBR 1 1600 30 .019 70 .044 SBL 1 1600 60 .038 80 .050 SBT 1 1600 40 .044* 50 .056* SBR 0 0 30 40 EBL 1 1600 20 .013* 40 .025 EBT 2 3200 450 .141 1020 .319* EBR 1 1600 120 .075 310 .194 WBL 1 1600 40 .025 120 .075* WBT 3 4800 1120 .233* 680 .142 WBR d 1600 90 .056 40 .025 Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .387 59. Marguerite & Coast Hw. 525 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 150 .094* 160 .100* NBT 1 1600 100 .063 120 .075 NBR 1 1600 80 .050 80 .050 SBL 1 1600 70 .044 110 .069 SBR 1600 .106* 1280 .125* 0 160 EBL 1 1600 90 .056* 100 .063* EBT 3 4800 1350 .294 1980 .438 EBR 0 0 60 120 WBL 1 1600 50 .031 110 .069 WBT 2 3200 2050 .641* 1600 .500* WBR 1 1600 20 .013 40 .025 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION / w cm rw.1 60. Spyglass H. & San Joaquin H. Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 60 .038 50 .031 1600 .013* 30 .025* NBR 0 20 SBL 1 1600 60 .038* 40 .025* 80 0.00 1 SBR d 1600 2 .11775 16 EBL 1 1600 80 .050* 270 .169* EBT 2 3200 650 .203 1040 .325 EBR 1 1600 20 .013 60 .038 WBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 2 3200 1150 .359* 640 .200* WBR d 1600 70 .044 70 .044 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .162* SBR .081* TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 61. Poppy & Coast Hw. .622 .bUU Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 20 .013* 30 .019 1600 100 .019 60 .044* NBR 0 20 SBL 0 0 50 120 {.075}* 1600 10 .044* 10 .088 SBR 1 EBL 1 1600 10 .006* 20 .013 3200 1370 .431 1940 .609* EBR 0 0 10 10 WBL 1 1600 20 .013 20 .013* 3200 1930 ,616* 1620 .531 WBR p TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .679 69,32, /41 62. Newport Coast & SR•73 NB Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBT 2 3200 1310 .409* 810 .253 NBR f 510 270 SBT 2 3200 440 .138 970 .303* SBR 0 0 01 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 WBL 1.5 340 300 WBT 0 3200 0 .138* 0 .103* WBR 0.5 100 30 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 64. Newport Coast & San Joaquin 547 .406 Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 120 .038 140 .044* NBT 3 4800 1520 .317* 730 .152 NBR SBT 3 4800 780 .163 1130 .235* SBR 1 1600 170 .106 400 .250 1600 540 .338* 340 .213* EBL 0 EBR 2 3200 90 .028 100 .031 WBL 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 WBR Right Turn Adjustment SBR .015* Note: Assumes Right -Turn Overlap for EBR TOTAL CAPACITY'UTILIZATION .655 993S 507 65. Newport Coast & Coast Hw. Subarea Maximum With Improvements AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 NBT 1 1600 10 .006* 10 .006* NBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 SBL 2 3200 310 .097* 830 .259* 1 1600 .006 220 .006 SBR 210 EBL 1 1600 260 .163* 140 .088* EBT 3 4800 950 .198 1620 .338 EBR 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBL 1 1600 10 .006 10 .006 WBT 3 4800 1450 .302* 1250 .260* WBR Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .568 .613