HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESIDENTIAL GROWTH ELEMENT 1983*NEW FILE*
RESIDENTIAL GROWTH
ELEMENT 1983
I
RESIDENTIAL GROWTH ELEMENT
THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN
ADOPTED AND NCIBY THE
MARCH
MENDED FOR APPROVAL
ING COMMISSION
%*, 1973
ADOPTED BY THE ll COUNCIL
MAY 29, 1973
TEXT INCORP(
78-3C, AD(
I'\
I = .
I = r
I c r
I = r
I = "
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ------------------------------------------ Page (i)
NERAL CITY-WIDE RESIDENTIAL -ZONING POLICIES --------- Page 1
CIT -WIDE RESIDENTIAL GROWTH LIMITS ------------------- Page 2
RESID�TIAL GROWTH LIMITS FOR EACH SECTION OF THE
CITY.: \\
Stat\tical Area Al (Banning Property) ----------- Page 5
Statistical Areas A2 and A3 (Hoag Hospital
and CounNy Island -------=-------------------- ----Page G
Statistica\Division B (West Newport and
Central Newp rt)---------------------------------Page 9
Statistical Di ision C (Lido Island) ------------- Page 11
Statistical Division D (Balboa Peninsula) -------- Page 12
Statistical Divisio L (Balboa Island) ----------- Page 14
Statistical Area F1 ( \vine Terrace) ------------- Page 15
Statistical Areas F2,nd F4 (OldCorona del Mar) ----------------------------Page 16
Statistical Areas F5, F6, F and F8
("East" Corona del Mar) ------ -------------------Page 17
r
Statistical Division G (Promont y Point
and Bayside Drive Area)--------- ---------------Page 18
Statistical Division H (Mariner's le,
Newport Heights, and Cliff Haven) --- ------------ Page 19
Statistical Division J (Westcliff, Dov
Shores, Baycrest and Santa Ana Heights) - -------- Page 21
r Statistical Division K (Bluffs, Eastbluff,
Park Newport) ----------------- ------------- ----Page 23
Statistical Division L (Newport Center,
Big Canyon) ------------------------------------ -Page25
Statistical Division M (Harbor'View Hills,
r' Spyglass, Jasmine Creek) -------------------------Pa e27
STATISTICAL DIVISIONS MAP -------------------------------- Paige
AMENDMENTS --------------------------------------------- Page 30
RESIDENTIAL GROWTH PLAN (MAP) -------------------------- Insert at
End
r
INTRODUCTION
Th Residential Growth Element addresses the question of, "How
many eople are to live in Newport Beach, and in what kind of
housing.", and includes "Residential Zoning Policies" and the
"Residents 1 Growth Limits" resulting from these policies. The
residential ning policies are based primarily on policies con-
tained in the a opted General Plan Policy Report and the substan-
tial citizen inpu received during the General Plan program. It
is apparent from ci 'zen reaction that an "Unlimited Growth"
policy is opposed and at some limitation on residential growth,
below the levels contain in the "Trend -Growth" projection made
by the City's economic cons tants, Development Research Asso-
ciates, is desired. Therefore the proposals reflect a "Limited -
Growth" policy which, it is felt meets the previously -adopted
policies and the general "desires o the community."
The Effect of Residential Growth on Su ort Systems
In attempting to determine the effects o\he
us residential
growth levels on such support systems asand sewer and the
school district, etc., discussions were ith the appropriate
City departments and the Newport Mesa Scis ict. It is
recognized through the deliberations ofverni bodies of
the City that there are physical constrain term of limitedcapacity of the physical systems) and maonomic th sholdpoints" (in terms of a drastic "jump" insts of prov ingservices) and thattheCity will continueitor these constraints as it determines the need to doy the use of ten
(i)
year revenue and expenditure projections and by managing needed
1,apital improvements, the City shall assure a favorable budget
pokture.
The Ci 's transportation planning consultant, Alan M. Voorhees
and Asso 'ates, Inc., has indicated that the most severe possible
cutback in sidential growth (limiting all residential develop-
ment to low-d sity single-family) would result in some reduction
in potential tra• fic volumes on certain links of the street
system. However, a measure as drastic as limiting all residen-
tial development to s gle-family does not seem reasonable and
may not be desirable, wh n viewed against other objectives such
as: 1) encouraging redev lopment.in some areas; 2) preserv-
ing some open space within d elopments; and 3) encouraging
innovative residential developm •ts. Thus the effect of resi-
dential growth limits, within the ange of reasonable alterna-
tives on the total transportation s tem, does not have major
significance, although it is obvious t t the "lower the -better"
still holds in terms of future traffic ge ration.
P
The major environmental problems which result f m population
growth are regional in nature and will not be mate Tally affected
by a difference of ten or twenty thousand persons. wever, it
is apparent that a reduction in potential residential g wth is
favorable to the local environment, in "smaller -scale" en 'ron-
mental terms. The City of Newport Beach• also may be able'to et
an example, and otherwise influence other local agencies in th
region to reduce potential population growth.
In view of these considerations, it can be said that the major
'ssues are "Community Character" and "Quality of the Living Ln-
vi nment." There are apparently no physical and economic con-
strai is to residential growth-, within the limited range from
the low t feasible limit and the "Trend -Growth" projection.
The questi h is not "What can we support?" o'r "What can we
afford?" T question is, "What do we want?"
Consideration o\considera
ntial growth limits involves more 'than
just a limit onntial population -- the future "Commun-
ity Character" lity of the Living Environment" in New-
port Beach willh affected by the type of residential
development as ul ion. Therefore, the proposals in
this report refsidera ion for the "housing mix" (percen-
tage of single -duplex, d multi -family units) and the
size of residenuctures.
Based on the policies Vn the adopted\potenti
Policy Report,
the Residential Growth Element propos
1) Assure a continuing predomina-family
and duplex units and limit thumber
of multi -family units.
2) Limit the size of residential structures to revent
massive, boxy and out -of -character buildings a
overbuilding of small lots.
RESOLUTION NO. 7985
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH ADOPTING THE RESIDENTIAL
GROWTH ELEMENT OF THE NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL
PLAN
WHEREAS, a phase of the City's General Plan Program
has\'nvolved.the preparation of a Residential Growth Element; and
S, the General Plan Policy Report, adopted by
thecil on March 13, 1973, states that the City
shalits on residential growth; and
WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Newport
Beach, pursuant Section 707 of the Newport Beach City
Charter, has held a ublic hearing to consider the adoption
of the Residential Gro th Element as a part of the City's
General Plan and has ado ed and has recommended that the
City Council adopt said ele ent; and
WHEREAS, the City Coun '1 has conducted a public
hearing to consider the adoption f the Residential Growth
Element as a part of the City's Gen ral Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED\adopt
ty Council
of the City of Newport Beach does hera part
of the General Plan the Residential Gt described
above, a copy of which is on file in.f the City Clerk.
ADOPTED THIS 29tti day of , 1973.
mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CERTIFI A TRUE AND CTN
—... ^ . ..lc�
CLE K OF THE CITY OF NEY&W BEACH
GATE, SEP 1973
RESOLUTION NO'. 795
_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ADOPTING THE RESI-
DENTIAL GROWTH ELEMENT OF THE NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL PLAN
\edh
, a phase of the City's General Plan Program
hase preparation of a Residential Growth Element; and
, the General Plan Policy Report, adopted by the
Citn March 13, 1973, states that the City shall.
setesidential growth; and
, rsuant to Section 707 of the City Charter
of Newp rt Beach, the Planning Commission has held
public hearings to coftider the adoption of the Residential
Growth Element as a part of the City's General Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE RESOLVED that the Planning
Commission does hereby adopt d recommend to the City Council
the Residential Growth Element the Newport Beach General
Plan described above, a copy of wh\15th
file in the
Newport Beach Community Developmenent.
Regularly passed and adoptePlanning Commission
of the .City of Newport Beach on thy of March 1973.
AYES: B! kley, Glass
NOES:
ABSENT:
C
,/Seal7etary Jacqueline E. Heather
airman lGordon Glb(ss
er
GENERAL CITY-WIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONING POLICIES
Following are the general City-wide residential zoning policies
for the City of Newport Beach:
1. r 5-2-4@W6401 development; shall 6e " 44"
2. Further residential development shall be prohibited in
all commercial and industrial zones, except where .cpaa4a4
zoning districts are established which permit a mixture.
4. The size of all future residential buildings shall be
*46
through use of
floor area ratios, lot coverage limits, and building
bulk regulation. Regulations, including revised zoning,
shall be developed for each area to
.c. the character of 44w residential
neighborhoods and to, provide outdoor living area and
landscaping.
5. Variances for additional units on undersized lots shall
not be granted.
6. Standards for provision of adequate off-street parking
for all residential uses shall be adopted.
- 1 -
Buildable acreage is defined as follows:
ildable acreage includes the entire site,
le areas with a slope greater than two to
one, less any area required to be dedi-
cated to a City for park purposes, and
any perimet open space; further, buildable
acreage shall include any area to be
used for street p oses.
When any individual prt is developed
for a. residential areaod; den Is
may
vary within the project; howev the total
gross density for the whole proje may not
exceed the limit indicated in the Re en-
tial Growth Element.
The residential growth •4imi tc resulting from the policies for
each section of the City, when aggregated to overall City totals,
result in a total of approximately40,500 dwelling units, with
an estimated population of approximately 96100 - - F*I 19—r" 9 "^hS
)
following chart illustrates the existing "Trend -Growth" pro-
jecte nd "Limited -Growth" levels of dwelling units, and the
estimated h�th
pes and population which would result. As
indicated onrt, the "Limited -Growth" level based on the
policies for each sects of the City, will result in a greater
proportion of single-family duplex units than the "Trend -
Growth" projection (which would re t in nearly half of the
total number of units in multi -family de opments). This is
consistent with the adopted "Land Use Policy" "a reserving the
"predominant one'and two-family residential.charactel%Z,,.con-
tained in the General Plan Policy Report.
_�:Iis questionable whether any residential develop -
will occur on the unincorporated Beeco propertyrl to Ana River Mouth prior to 1995.
The estimate of popu nd dwelling units con-
tained in, this element woul bbe adjusted
downward if
no development occurs wi s time
frame.
ESTIMATED CITY-WIDE DWELLING UNIT AND
POPULATION LEVELS BASED ON THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING POLICIES
Total No. Single-Dup4g�9- Multi MobiI
of Family Family Hom7 Population
' Dwelling
Units
--7.�r1-09- .�44 -btu--�►rD$+z- -68r4�
.o .L,Llt33� -f4-F2aiY� +0** f
Re
Growth"-4GrfiG4� �S,A3Z �Pri29 -�b8� —� �96,052Leed on-{.24-F22+�}thentia],�„
Zoning P es
I Incluces all permanent units and mobile homes; does not include rooms in hotels,
motel or convalescent hospitals.
.�
-4* Incluces all units where-ti-wc or more units occupy one lot.
-& Inclu(es mobile homes in mobilehome parks intended for permanent residents.
Estirm ted population in permanent dwelling units.
population estimates are based on a "No Vacancy" assumption,
thus vepresenting maximum population. The actual resulting population may
be slightly lower.)
-YO Includes incorporated City area, plus unincorporated aPs&6wswIv Beeco Property,
and Santa Ana Heights.
- 3 -
,
IDENTIAL GROWTH LIMITS FOR EACH SECTION OF THE CITY
Following are the R ential Zoning Policies and Residential
Growth Limits for each sects f the City.
(The boundaries of each section, the are esignated for resi-
dential use, and the anticipated housing types a ndicated on
the "Residential Growth Plan" at the end of this Element.
k
- 4 -
In this area the Residential Growth-64m4*•
be 9,994 dwelling units. If_the proposed West Newport Harbor
proves feasib-le, the same number of units would be permitted,
but the housing'type and density would change. However, no
individual development would be permitted to exceed.fifteen dwell-
ing units per buildable acre.
for Statistical Area Al
Since all of this area, except the City -owned parcels, is unincor-
porated, no City action is possible at this time to assure main-
tenance of the Residential Growth Limit. However, this Residential
Growth Element indicates the City Is intent and the zoning at the
time of annexation will reflect this adopted limit.
ftis entire area has been designated as a "Specific Area Plan" on
the Land Use Plan and all proposals for residential or other uses
shall be reviewed as'a part of, that Specific Area Plan except for
the aid iqDwmp Site which shall be 284 dwelling units.
Estimated Residential Growths64m4 for Statistical Area AI-BeseeF
RQj
Total No. Single--Bup4ex Multi - Mobile ked�
of Family Family Homes Population
Dwelling
Units
sidential
Gr th Limit
base In the -2,994 •3T4g3 -- -i 49;` --
Residen 1
Zoning Po
5 -
rket studies performed by the• City's Economic Consultant indicate
that a onversion on the industrially zoned and developed land
in this area residential could be supported. The Residential
Growth Element pro es that conversion of industrial land to
residential development rohibited in order to: 1) limit•the
population in the area, and 2) event the poor mixture of land
uses, and probable deterioration, whi would result from a gradual
conversion. It is apparent that this area suitable for contin-
ued industrial use in terms of the•location, bein djacent to a
larger industrial area in Costa Mesa, and the potential rove-
ments in access to the area.
for Statistical Area A2
dential development east of Superior Avenue shall
be limited to. eas currently developed for resi-
dential use, or in the Residen i ed Community
District (Versailles).
2) Residential development west of Superior Avenue shall
be permitted in all areas except the M-1 District.
ver, the area included in the "Specific Area Plan"
on the L se Plan may include uses other than resi-
t dential. Maximum ity on any individual project
shall be fifteen dwelling per buildable acre in
the area south of the westerly exten of l6th Street
to the present city boundary and a maximum de of
si•x dwelling units per buildable acre north of the ex
sion of 16th Street.
- 6 -
I
Estimated Residential Growthm64mi* for Statistical Area A24i*se4-
_ Total No. Single--Pup;em Multi - Mobile
of Family Family Homes Population
Dwelling
Units
.A7-vO- fi'*?O .."3_„ .49.3_ .SG»
idential
Gr h Limit
base the-iY4a3-
Residen 1
Zoning Pol
- 7 -
sidential Zoning Policy for Statistical Area A3
Since 1 of Statistical Area A3 is unincorporated, no City action
is possible this time in terms of zoning. However, the intent
of the City'to li the extent and density of residential devel-
opment will be conveyed the County. The Residential Growth
Element proposes that resident development at a maximum density
of fifteen dwelling units per builda acre be permitted in the
residentially designated areas of A3. The a north of Medical
Lane (private) and westerly of Placentia Avenue,a the'area east
of Placentia Avenue, should be reserved for industrial com-
mercial use, respectively.
Estimated Residential Growthal.k" for Statistical Area A3 $ar"
Me I-OdeWil,
Total No. Single--Dwp41 Multi.- Mobile 46
of Family Family Homes Population
Dwelling
Units
Aq OF i"Ra EGG- -2 - _
idential
Gr h Limit
base n the 4" --
Residen l
Zoning Po
i i B- 42.5-
--
-4b9-
The a" for this area are intended to result in: i)—Maxirtmat
„----.motile ,oa,. +; ,.+..RUR! ..,_+:-- 4) A limitation on
the size of buildings to preserve community character, and -80) A
more rational land use pattern. It is proposed that residential
development be limited to the area currently developed for resi-
dential use..
Conversely, it is proposed that no
further residential development be permitted in the remaining com-
mercial and industrial zones, such as Central Newport, Cannery
Village, and Lido Peninsula
for Statistical Division B
1)1 he Slough Area
shall be rezoned to the Open Space District.
ortion of the commercial strip on West Coast
High shall be rezoned to a two-family district
that would i de appropriate development standards
for buffers from th hway and limited access.
3) All R-2 and R-3 Districts w rly of the Newport
Pier shall remain as currently zon except for
public property, with the understanding th ppri
priate development standards will be developed.
.4+- Variances shall not be granted for an additional
unit on undersized lots.
.ir}+ No zone changes from commercial or industrial zoning
to residential zoning in Central Newport shall be
permitted, except for a few blocks in the area of
20th Street which are zoned C-1 and are almost entirely
developed for residential use, and except that limited
residential uses may be permitted with a Planned Com-
munity District application or with a special zoning
district which permits d mixture of residential and
commercial use. (Any additional dwelling units per-
mitted in the commercial areas will add to the Resi-
dential Growth Limits shown below.)
-6+ The R-3 and R-4 lots east of the Newport Pier shall
be considered with Statistical Division "D" for
zoning policy studies.
Estimated Residential Growth ++� for Statistical Division 8
ems-of-i�}#8
sident,al
1% th Limit
base n the
Reside al
Zoning PONY
Total No
of
Dwelling
Units
9,838
-4,4n
Single- .Drpioit- Multi- Mobile === e=-
Family Family Homes Population
}si a-s394—
63
346-- -W
eaa.�
- 10 -
Estimated
Residential
Growth%L +l
for Statistical Division C
Total No.
Single- -Drp;^x
Multi- Mobile
of
Family
Family Homes Population
Dwelling
Units
As oF-1 il,Q,.
-8b8
-48- ----2,'35
sidential
Gr h Limit
base the
-8:G.
Residen ' 1.
Zoning Po
The.yoapwis for Balboa Peninsula include provisions for _
rationalizing residential land use
4patterns, and limiting the,s.ize of residential structures to --
preserve community character.
for Statistical Division D
11 residential zones currently in existence 'shall be =
maintain h the understanding that appropriate
development standards be developed. Where ap- _
propriate, commercial zones may be ssified to
a residential zone.
2) The beach and the Newport Beach Elementary School
shall be rezoned to the OS - Open Space District;'the
City -owned property at Marinapark shall continue as
a mobilehome park until such time as that use is
phased out, at which time the property shall be
rezoned to the OS - Open Space District.
s•
3) No variances shall be granted which would permit an
additional unit on undersized lots.
New Harbor Yacht Club shall be rezoned to
the OS - Open p ct with the property
owner's agreement.
lots or combined lots with R-2 zoning may be
developed 'wiZR�w��th�an►two�,un�its with the approval
of the Planning Commission und'eT� s to be
established.
12 -
1.,
Estimated Residential Growth i4mk for Statistical Division D
Total No. Single--9ng4em. Multi - Mobile is
Family Family Homes Population
Dwelling
Units
sidental
G h Limit
base the �3,484 $a4 "898' i� '- ; 5'
Residen 1
Zoning Po
rr TTrnl nTllr c Tn•1 r
No change from the current R-1.5 zoning is proposed.
ism4pq ^W ky-for Statistical Division E
1) The current R-1.5 District regulations shall be
continued.
2) No variances shall be granted for an additional
unit on undersized lots.
urther residential development in the commercial
zones Balboa Island shall be controlled through
adoption of a cial zoning district which will
provide for a mixture commercial and residential
uses. (Any dwelling units bui n the commercial
zones will add to the Residential Grow imit
shown below.)
Estimated
Residential
Growth 44o4sb,for
Statistical Division E
Y
Total No.
Estimated Housing
Single- B"Pielr
;Fype Breeledawre.
Multi- Mobile Eat4ma ted�
of
Family
Family Homes Population
Dwelling
Units
�4ref�ifi�7+i
-2,QS
-642 a-14@@
—1-W 8,686
idential
G h Limit
base the
.B96;4
� -g0ai►
-jl� -- -r5,es _
Res iden T
Zoning Po
- 14 -
0
This area is essentially fully developed and stable. Therefore,
no
Policy for Statistical Area F1
No zone changes shall be granted
Estimated Residential Growth +4***, for Statistical Area Fl
idential
Gro Limit
based the
Resident
Zoning Poli
Total No
of
Dwelling
Units
4"
0
Single- .DIpI-x Multi - Mobile BEd.
Family Family Homes Population
J
r
The-pwapac.I3r. for old Corona del Mar are aimed primarily at pre-
serving community character.
-----=----- "- " for Statistical Areas F2, F3, and.F4
-A•1 esidential districts shall remain with appropriate develop-
ment standards ared. The effect on traffic and parking
is to be studied'in greater dept necessary, remedies are
to be reflected in the development standards.
Estimated Residential Growth ak4for Statistical Areas F2,
F3 and F4 4eee y
NAPO*40.1-�
ident,al
Gr h Limit
base the
Reside_ ' 1
Zoning Po
Total No.
of
Dwelling
Un i is
4r@W
Single- BNp4e0c Multi- Mobile rre,,,,aeaa-
Family Family Homes Population
42Z& 4r8Qi
- 16 -
rrnrrr•.rr nnnrnr rr re rv_ —^ r"r n ^- _ ` ' •' —`.
These areas are almost fully developed; however, there is some
potential for residential growth resulting from a small area of
R-2 zoning which is predominantly developed with single-family
residences.
Policy for Statistical Areas F5 F6, F7, and F8
The R-2 Districts in this area shall remain and no zone change
shall be granted which would permit an intensification of develop-
ment.
69
Estimated Residential Growth .4imi+Y.for Statistical Areas F5,
F6, F7, and F8
Total No. Single- •Ddplej• Multi - Mobile is timated
_ of Family Family Homes Population
Dwelling
Uni is
�Aref�if�e'� —7�i -636• -�• -83+ -- �2T99�
sidential
Gr h Limit
base the -�SZ. +l» 4Q& -83- ---2'289O
Residen 1
Zoning Pol
- 17 -
of the vacant land in Division G is either currently under
devel��• roved for development in the near future. The
only portion of Division he potential population can be
reduced is the Beacon Bay Residential Area s currently
zoned R-2, but predominantly developed as single-famly res
for Statistical Division G
All of the residential district in Beacon Bay shall
remain un S ecific Area Plan is developed and
approved. Said plan is repared within five
years after the adoption date of the Ge naft
lan.
2) No further residential development shall be permitted
in any commercial district in Division G.
Estimated Residential Growth4ok" for Statistical Division G
Total No. Single--BWlell Multi - Mobile Eatiirrated--
of Family Family Homes Population
Dwelling
Units
4— -63+ -- 3�J9•
sidential
Gr h Limit
base the 96*
Residen 1
Zoning Pol
- 18 -
I
All the residential portions of this area are almost fully developed;
however, the R-2 and R-3 Districts adjacent to Catalina Drive be-
tween.North Newport and Beacon Street are developed with single-
family residences. In addition, there is some potential for addi-
tional residential development on the Balboa Bay Club property.
Residential Zoning Policy for Statistical Division H
1) The R-2 and R-3 Districts adjacent to Catalina Drive
between North Newport Boulevard and Beacon Street
shall remain the same with
— �t�nd�ra�..........
The Old Newport Boulevard area between Santa Ana and
Cata Drive should be considered for rezoning to
a two-family ct with appropriate development
standards.
--- 3) The south side of 15th Street bet Irvine Avenue
and St. Andrews Road, currently in the "I" ict,
shall be rezoned to R-3.
a4+m Any further residential development on the Balboa Bay
Club site shall be permitted only in accordance with
a plan to be prepared by the Balboa Bay Club and
1
approved by the City.
-go) In the Old Newport Boulevard Specific Area Plan
District, residential uses shall be permitted in
- 19 -
conjunction with primary commercial or office uses,
subject to all other applicable development regula-
tions.
—6►) In all residential, zones in the Cliffhaven area, any
resubdivision which would result in lots smaller than
the average or typical lot shall be prohibited, so as
to preserve the scale and character of residential
development in that neighborhood. The zoning shall
be amended accordingly.
Estimated Residential Growth-Iriki.for Statistical Division H
As so 414JIUM
sidential
G h Limit
base the
Residen 1
Zoning Pol
Total No
of
Dwelling
Units
-E, 888�
Single- •Bap}ex Multi- Mobile Et;&464-
Family Family Homes Population
494 R
5 12W
- 20
I
-e-
The potential for residential growth in Division J'is primarily
due to the large vacant areas adjacent to Upper Bay. The remain-
der of Division J is essentially fully developed. ;Fhrpiepagai
i"4-- D_14;. for Statistical Division J
Castaways Site: 225 DU's maximum are allowed on the
ortherly forty -acre portion of the site. On the
so herly portion up to 100 DU's may be allowed
as an lternate use on approximately twenty.acres.
So
2) Vacant Pa el East of YMCA:
The 4.5 acr arcel on University Drive east of
the Y.M.C.A. ma be developed for office use
or multi -family re\permit
al use with 67 DU's-
maximum.
3) Westbay Site: Tharea adjacent to Irvine
Avenue at the nortorn of Upper Newport Bay
shall be designateen Spa related to the
"Upper Bay Wi'ldlifve"; howev provision
should be made fore development 'n case
public acquisitionfeasible. •For t reason
this property shoulned to permit resi tial
development, with aof 348 DU's on seventy
one acres.
- 21 -
Further intensification of the —
residential development in the "Santa Ana Heights"
area shall be discouraged. {Since this area is
unincorporated', no zoning action can be taken by
the City; however, the City will request that the
County prohibit'intensificatign of residential, use
in this area..}.
Estimated Residential Growth kWm%4 ► for Statistical Division J
Based on 6he 11Pei
Total No. Single- Wp4jl Multi- Mobile -mated
of Family Family Homes Population
Dwelling
Units
f+� -493;9• 05P9 - 44-- -; Igag— -99— -9,FF6
Y
sidential
G th Limit
base n the-61984- -�94; `44— 4,99;
ResIden 1
Zoning Po
Y
- 22 -
tential for residential growth in Division K is the result
of the large'va•cant si he Newporter In�and Park New-
port, and the three vacant sites in the Bluffs.
'Q''W for Statistical Division K
Newporter North Site: Residential development in the
rge vacant site north of the Newporter Inn shall be
limi d to a maximum of 440 DU's.
2) The Blu Development of the vacant sites in the
Bluffs shall a limited to a density not to exceed
that in the imme 'ately surrounding area.
3) Eastbluff Remnant: he "Land Trade Remnant" adjacent
to the "Bluffs" shall be ezoned from R-3-B to a, yet
to be developed, zoning dist 'ct which will permit a
maximum of forty-two dwelling un s, although it is
proposed that if possible this land acquired as
open space as part of the "Upper Newpor ay Wildlife
Reserve."
4) Bayview Landing Site: Residential development an
alternate use is permitted up to 85 DU's.
- 23 -
Estimated
Residential
Growthl66 t
for Statistical
Division K
Total No.
Single-—Bupiegr
Multi-
Mobile Esbimated-
of
Family
Family
Homes Population
Dwelling
Units
idential
G h Limit
base n the
-2r}94
�" '1s606
-- 'BT g
Residen ' 1
Zoning Po ' y
0
- 24 -
The potential for residential growth in Division L is the
result of the build -out of Big Canyon, development of Aero-
nutronic-Ford, and the possibility of additional residential
development in Newport Center.
for Statistical Division L
Big Canyon: Future additional development shall
be limited to 260 DU's, with 160 DU's allocated
t Area 10 of the Planned Community Development
Plan and 100 DU's to be allocated elsewhere,
subjec to approval by the City.
2) Sea Islan Condominium Site: The maximum number
of DU's perm ted is 226. (Part of Newport
Center.)
3) Newport Center: dditional sites for residential
development in Newpo Center shall be permitted
at a density not to exc d thirty-five dwelling
units per buildable acre, ubject to the approval
of the City. Total DU's sha not exceed 538.
4) Aeronutronic-Ford Site: In ac rdance with
General Plan Amendment No. 31 (ado ted by the.
City Council February 9, 1976) resid tial develop-
ment may be approved by the Planning Co ission
and City Council -as an alternate use for t cur-
rently Undeveloped portion of the Aeronutroni
Ford site, with specific density limits and
- 25 -
c�y�opment standards to be determined at such
time as the owner submits development
plans for City approval.
Estimated Residential Growth -li"+-L-for Statistical Division L
Total No. Single--QWplam Multi- Mobile -Estimatedof Family Family Homes Population
Dwelling
Units
coo-
sidential lGr th Limit
base n the -20' 95 Z --
Reside al
Zoning P 'cy
Qeae figures assume residential development
of 610 DU's w�i1Tlf a Aeronutronic-
Ford site in lieu of commercial or i NS��i+
development.
- 26 -
0
The potential for residential growth in Division M is primarily
the result of the "building -out" of the approved Residential
Planned Community Districts.
ismi
for Statistical Division M
The vacant R-3 District northeast of San Miguel
a Pacific View Drive shall be limited to a
maximu f 15 DU's per buildable acre, and rezoned to the
P-C
District for to
development.
2)
The
vacant parcel
the northeast corner of Mac-
Arthur and Fifth Avenuel#4&y be developed for resi-
dential� use with a maximum ofi`*Ak DU's.
3) The vacant
R-3-B'site
east
of the
or View
Elementary
School
shall be
rezoned
to R-
wm6o The multi -family site in the northern tip of the
Harbor View Hills P-C shall be
aLLaar*a a maximum of ten dwelling units per gross
acre.
e land between Fifth Street and Sand Castle Drive
shall be rezci'Rt' R-2-B to R-1-B, although it
is anticipated that this land wi uired for
park and/or highway purposes.
- 27 -
mm64 Residential development on the fifty acre site
shall be
imi;e@t,& a maximum of-175 DU's.
Residential development of the MWD Reservoir site
s be.limited to an area totaling approximately
11.5 acr and shall be limited to a maximum of
4 DU's per bui ble acre.
8) Residential developm on the vacant parcel south-
east of MacArthur and Ford d (Freeway Reservation
East) shall be limited to 100 DU aximum.
9) Expansion of the Baywood Apartments sha a limited
to 140 DU's additional maximum.
Estimated Residential Growth-h+wA b for Statistical Division M
Total No.
of
Dwelling
Units
sidentia1
Gr h Limit
base the
Residen
Zoning Poli
Single- Ovp4ew Multi- Mobile
Family Family Homes
--
Es ti me e i
Population
-i q l;84
- 28 -
1
N
1
'0 ice
city ofLL
Newport Beach
Sj statistical divisions
statistical areas
Yam.
' Al '
f�
Advanea Pig
I\
AMENDMENTS
Lis\-d below are the official amendments to the Residential Growth
as adopted by the City Council.
General Plan Date of
Amendment City Council
Number I Adoption
6 July 22, 1974
solution No. 831
12 Dec. 1974
Resolution o. 8400
Amendment
Amend the Residential Growth
Plan (map) to delete the
residential designation of
the "Fun Zone" site, located
just east of Palm Street on
the Balboa Peninsula.
Amend the Residential Growth
Plan to change the land use
designation from "Multi -Family
Residential" to a designation
which would provide for "Adminis-
trative, Professional and Financial
Commercial" use as an alternate
use in the area on the northeast
side of Lido Park Drive between
28th Street and Lafayette Avenue.
14 March 24, 1975 \ignations
e Residential Growth Plan
Resolution No. 8418 revise the open space
ions in the Harbor View
rea by•deleting the open
aseo" adjacent to the
uin Reservoir and by
the extent of the open
e ignation on the southerly
S glass Hills Road.
19 March 24, 1975 Amend the R idential Growth Plan
Resolution No. 8457 (map) to chap a ta•nd use designation
of lot at 809 ast Bay Avenue
(in Central Bal a) from "Retail
and Service Comm cial" to "Two -
Family Residentia '
W
July 28, 1975
solution No. 8557
1. Amend the Reside ia1 Growth
Plan (map) to designa the fifty -
acre site north of Paci is View
Memorial Park as "Low -De ity
Residential".
2. Add the following wordinX to
Page 29 of the Residential Gr th
Element:
- 30 -
0
General Plan
Date of
mendment
City Council
mber
Adoption
Amendment
"(6) Residential development
on the fifty -acre site north
of Pacific view Memorial Park
shall be limited to a maximum
of 175 dwelling units."
3. Change the statistical charts
in the Residential Growth Element
to reflect the 175 dwelling unit
increase.
20
my 28, 1975
Amend the Residential Growth
Res ution No.
Plan (map) deleting the designation
as "Low -Density Residential" for
8558
the property on the north side
of Coast Highway easterly of
Jamboree Road.
26
Nov. 10, 975
1. Amend the Residential Growth
Resolution
Element to.create a "Medium -
Density Residential category
8630
to
include developments of more
than four dwelling units per
buildable acre with a maximum
density of ten dwelling units per
buildable acre.
Amend the Residential Growth
El ent to change "Low -Density
Res ential" from a maximum of
ten elling units per gross acre
to a ximum of four dwelling units
p'er bui dable acre.
3. Delet the definition of "Gross
Residentia Acreage" on Page 1
of the Resi tial Growth Element
and replace w h a definition
of buildable a eage as follows:
"Buildable acre e, includes
the entire site, less areas
with a slope of g eater than
two to one, and do not
include any portion f
,perimeter streets an erimeter
open space."
4. Delete from Page (i) of he
Residential G-owth Element un er
The Effect of Residential Grow
on _SQK rt S stems, the followi
- 31 -
Gen ral flan Date of
Amen en City Council
Numbe I Adoption I Amendment
30
Nov. 10, 1975
Resolution No.
8632
"As a result of these discussions,
it was determined that, within
the range of residential growth
from the lowest reasonable
limit to the "Trend Growth"
projection, there are no
physical constraints (in terms
of limited capacity of the
physical systems) and no major
'economic threshold points'
(in terms of a drastic 'jump'
in the cost of providing
services.)"
and replace said language with the
following:
"It is recognized -through the
deliberations of the governing
bodies of the City that there
are physical constraints (in
terms of limited capacity of
the physical systems) and major
'economic threshold points' (in
terms of a drastic 'jump' in
the costs of providing services)
Rand that the City will continue
monitor these constraints as
i determines the need to do so."
5. Am d the Residential Growth
Plan (m ) adding a numerical
desi,gnati n indicating the
maximum nu er of dwelling units
permitted o each large undeveloped
site.
6. Revise the sidential Growth
Plan (map) as re ired for
consistency with a above changes.
7. Amend the Reside ial Growth
Element text as requti d for
consistency with the ab ve changes.
Amend the Residential Gro h Plan
(map) deleting the design_ 'on
for "Residential with Altern to
Use" from Shellmaker Island a
the two unnamed islands, the
area within the Ecological Rese
adjacent to Jamboree Road, and
- 32 -
Gene 1 Plan Date of
Amend nt City Council
Number Adoption Amendment
the publicly owned land easterly
of Irvine Avenue and 23rd Street.
33 January 12, 1975 1. Amend the Residential Growth
Resolution No. 8676 Plan (map)"deleting the
designation for "Multi -Family
Residential" from that portion
of the County Triangle (Statistical
Division A3) north of the
extension of Medical Lane (private)
and westerly of Placentia Avenue.
2. Amend the Residential Growth
Element text to delete the
provision on Page 9 that residential
development be permitted throughout
the County Triangle except for
the strip along the northern edge,
and adding the provision that
"the area north of Medical Lane
(private) and westerly of Placentia
be'reserved for industrial
development."
31 February 9, 1976 1end the Residential Growth Plan
(m ) to include "Residential" as
Resolution No. 8694 an ternate use on the undeveloped
ports n of the Aeronutronic-ford
site. (Note: This change was
modifie by General Plan Amendment
76-3-F).
76-3-A November 22, 1976 An amendme\Servi
Residential
Growth Eleange the
Resolution No. 8938 designatiolots at the
southeast Dahlia and Fifth
Avenues inl Mar from
"Retail anCommercial" to
"Two -Familial".
76-3-B I November 22, 1976
olution No. 8938
An amendment to the L d Use Element,
Residential Growth Ele nt, and
Recreation and Open Spac Element
to revise the open space d paseo
system in Harbor View Hill for
consistency with adopted Pla ned
Community development plans.
- 33 -
G eral Nlan
Am dment
Mum r
Date of
City Council
Adoption
76 Y F I November 22, 1976
Resolution No. 8938
Amendment
An amendment to the Residential
Growth Element text adding a
discussion of the possibility of
residential development on the
undeveloped portion of the
Aeronutronic-Ford site, to reflect
the previously -adopted General
Plan Amendment No. 31 as follows:
"In accordance with General Plan
Amendment No. 31 (adopted by
the City Council February 9,
1976) residential development
may be approved by the Planning
Commission and City Council as
an alternate use for the
currently undeveloped portion
of the Aeronutronic-Ford site,
with specific density limits
and development standards to be
determined at such time as the
property owner submits develop-
ment plans for City approval."
76-3-I November 22, 197 An amendment to the Residential
Growth Element changing the
Resolution No. 8938 designation of property at 807
st Bay Avenue from "Retail and
S vice Commercial" to "Two -
Fa ly Residential".
77-1-A I March 28, 1977-
Resolution No. 9035
77-1-F I March 28, 1977
Resolution No. 9035
An a\a207-215
o the Residential
Growp changing the
desifive lots
loca-215 19th Street on
the insula from "Two-
Familtial" to "Multi-
Famitial"..
An amendment to\PlanAmen
sidential
Growth Plan mapng the
designation of ts at the
southeast cornehlia and
Fifth Avenues ia del Mar
from "Two-Familntial"
to "Retail and mmercial"
and "Administraro ssional
and Financial Cal".
(Reverses GenerAmen ent
76-3-A)
34 -
eneraI Plan
A .ndinent
Nu er
77-2-
77-3-C
Date of
City Council
Adoption Amendment —
i
eptember 19. 1977 An amendment to the Residential Growth
esolution No. Element designating the MWD Reservoir —
9192 site and adjacent property for Low -
Density Residential" as an alternate
use, and adding wording to Page 26 of _
the Residential Growth Element text
as follows:
"Residential development of the MWD ' --�
Reservoir site shall be limited to an
area totalling approximately 11.5 acres
and shall be limited to a maximum
of four dwelling units per buildable.
acre."
cember 1977 An amendment to the Residential Growth
solution Element to revise the definition of
92.1 buildable acreage as follows:
Buildable acreage includes the entire
site, less areas with a slope greater
than two to one, and less any area
opm space
s
ana any Derime
78-1-B
August 14, 1978
Resolution No.
9411
e Reside!"tial Growth
Element te a 2.3 -acre parcel
adjacentport Terrace develop- {
An amen\Beachf
ment forsity Residential.
(Subjecttion to the City of
Newport the City of Costa
Mesa). —
78-1-C
August 14, 1978
e.ntial' Growth
An amendment to th\accordingy.
Element to add worfollows:
Resolution No.
"In all residentis in the '9411
Cliff Haven areasubdivisionwhich
would resulis smaller than
the avdrage or tyt shall be
prohibited, so ass ve the scaleand
character ofti develop-
ment in that neigd. he zoning
shall be amended ngly.
=F
i
- 35 -
—
Ge ral plan
Amen ..
Numbe
78-2
Date of
City Council
Adoption Amendment
December 20, 1978 1. An amendment to the Residential
Growth Element for the Castaways
Resolution No. Commercial site to provide for
9485 Medium Density Residential as an
alternate use with a maximum of
100 DU's.
1.(a) An amendment to the Res. Growth
Element reducing allowable de-
velopment on the 40 acre Casta-
ways Residential site from 3ff
units to 225 units.
An amendment to the Residential
Growth Element for the Bayview
Landin site to provide for
Medium Density Residential as an
alternate use with a maximum of
85 DU's.
2.
3. An amendment to the Residential
Growth Element fo-r the Westbav
site to reduce allowable d welling
units from 426 to 348.
I4. n amendment to the Residential
owth Element for the Newporter
No th site to reduce al owab e
dwe ling units from 704 to 440.
-5. An am dment to the Residential
i Growth lement for Freewa
Reserva on East to limit the
maximum n ber of dwelling units
! to 100.
6. An amendment o the Residential
} Growth Element for the Cal'trans
West parcel to lete the Multiple-
' family Resident- designation.
i
7. An amendment to the esidential
Growth Element for t Eastbluff
Remant to reduce the ximum
allowable dwellings fr 84 to 42.
18. An amendment to the Resid tial
Growth Element for Big Can n (Area
10) to reduce the allowable
dwelling units from 338 to 2 ;
with 160 DU's allocated to Are 10,
and 100 DU's to be allocated
j elsewhere.
36 -
r , P
General Plan
mendment
tuber
Date of
City Council
Adoption
Amendment
9. An amendment to the Residential
Growth Element for the Baywood
Expansion to limit the maximum
dwelling units to be added to
the existing ba-ywood development
to 140 DU's.
78-3-A
December 20, 1978
An amendment to the Residential Growth
Element to indicate an alternate use
solution No.
to Multiple Family Residential for
9476
the 4.5 acre parcel on University
Drive east of Irvine. Boulevard (east
of the Y.M.C.A. site).
78-3-C
December 1978 An amendment to the Residential Growth
Resolutio No. Element for the Old Newport Boulevard
476 area adding wording to the text.as
follows:
"Residential uses shall be permitted
in conjunction with primary commercial
or office uses, subject to all other
applicable development regulations."
l-37-