Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1530 PLACENTIA AVE_14 UNITS APTI RESIDENTIAL ZONING CORRECTIONS Telephone: (714) 644-3200 By• enia Garci Assistant Planner By:Marc Myers Assistant Planner Date: '-SJ " / S A' Plan Check NO: By:Christy Teague Assistant Planner Districting Map NO: _p _ Land Use Element Page No, Corrections Required: Legal Description: Lot Wck Section Verify legal description with Public Works Covenant required. Please have owner's signature document and return to me. /I. Lot Size zone No. of Units Allowed '/O'/ Proposed r I _3 �! �� �� Buildable Area : Maximum Structuiral Area stairway(s) on one level and r ire Proposed Structural Area: Provide tissue overlay of calculatior Open Space Area'cu. ft. x height limit x si ). This a must 6'x 61), and open on at least otherwise specified in Zoning Code. x (409", J 4- 6 Dems,m ISOAJ0s / a6g notarized on the attach�ed���� is tr.ur?� Sir Y/Y/''YYlr P-0 ass pan g exterior walls, x buildable area. �dable area. Sume of space a ui3dafile width at least six feet in any direction (6'x es, or one side and one end, unsFCE Reguired etbacksetbacks Front ( F�2n oirl CCi1J — �f!/TG/ c� / o, ©p { o ReOazr,("1 3 •(�,f 1"V_0h�% may not be permitted to encroach into required setback: Fireplaces /Garden Height Limitation Measured from natural grade to mid -point of roof. Code allows an additional 510" to the peak of the ridge height. Allowable mid -point C95 Allowable ridge height imensior;-aH. elevations from natura -- mid-point(s) of roof plane(s) a&r ridge(s) of roof plane(s) Label natural grade and finished grade on all elevations. Distance between buildings Maximum Coverage/�j Number of Stories C+2- Reguired Parking: clear inside minimum dim ension 9'-4" x 19' single space 17'-6" x 19' two spaces0(: ALJ 8' x 16' third/fourth apace(s) 1F��Tre-a 3pAcEs Tv i8G GoC>q fF-D /� 01 Z_o r-rlA&M75) Label clear inside dimensions of provided parking spaces Is demolition proposed? ties - s fr4i> �� a U- ()- �pj;7 FN -4iras Number of units to be demolished,gG'!,>i.✓Kz SYW/'j 6r;:;1V -S7v2'z;, 1^ Fairahare Contribution N/Y San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee /ram Park Dedication Fes SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH: Please indicate any discretionary approval numbers on the plans and incorporate the attached; excerpt of minutes and list of findings and conditions into the blueline drawings approval letter into the blueline drawings Modifications Committee: Indicate Approval No. on Plans Modification required for Planning commission/City-Council: Use Permit: No. _ variance: No. Resubdivision/Tract: No. Site Plan Review: No.=�roJci� Amendment: No. UP Other T (!54;F M 7" Traffic Engineer Approval of Landscape Plans Building Department: Grading Engineer Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans Coastal Anoroval Required: Exempt, Because Categorical Exclusion No. (C.E.O.) Effective Date (Note: Building permits may be issued 10 days following issuance of C.E.O.) Approval In Concept (AIC) No. (Notes File 3 sets of plane: site, floor, and elevations) Waiver 0 Effective Date Coastal Development Permit No. ' Effective Date Y Miscellaneous 0<1 1. Provide floor plan(s), fully dimensioned, showing all room uses. / 2. Provide plot plan, fully dimensioned, showing: �✓�� location of all buildings, and distance to property lines.7%ai"(Ek=L distance from face of curb to front property line (verify with Public Works) second and third floor footprints (if applicable) z all projections (i.e. fireplaces, bay windows), label distance(s) to PL(s) t�t7C/ 3. Chimney (and chimney caps etc.) heights permitted only as required by U.B.C. or manufacturer specifications. 4. fools, spas, walls, fences, patio coy rq a ancL oth r f � ng.str urea ( require separate reviews and permits. 7/L.t.IC F. S. Association Approval dvisor Issuance of a Building Permit by the City does not relieve applic of legal requirement to observe covens a, condi- tions and restrictions which may be recorded against the property or to obtain community association approval of plans. NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200. FORMS\RBS•'ION.COR City Council Meeting November 26, 1.990 Agenda Item No. D-1 ADDENDUM CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A. Request for Commur'ty Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds Public Hearing) Request to consider the granting of $50,000 in CDBG funds, $2,500 of 1989-90 unused Social Service funding; $38,901 of 1989-90 funds previously allocated to New Housing Construction; $1,000 of 1990-91 funds previously allocated to New Housing Construction; and $7,599 of 1990-91 funds previously allocated to Administration; to assist with the development of a 14 unit apartment for low income persons and families and a finding of no significant effect on the environment. /k'P B. Site Plan Review No. 60 Public Hearing Request to approve a site plan review for the purpose of permitting a residential density bonus of 6 units within an affordable housing development containing a total of 14 units on property located.in the MFR (2178) District. In accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code, the applicant is also requesting an adjustment to the off-street parldng requirement and the minimum dwelling unit size as incentives for the development of affordable housing. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow the construction of open carports on the front one- half of the lot, where the Zoning Code restricts open carports to the rear one-half of the site; and the acceptance of an environmental document. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 715, First Addition to the Newport Mesa Tract, located at 1530 Placentia Avenue, on, the easterly side of Placentia Avenue, between 15th Street and Production Place, in Northwest Newport. ZONE: MFR (2178) APPLICANTS: Lawrence M. Campeau and James G. White, Jr., Costa Mesa OWNERS: George and Margaret Wilson, Pasadena >, r City Council - 2. Additional Conditions Staff recommends that the following conditions be added to the City Council Resolution for Site Plan Review No. 60. If any underground fuel tanks are found to be located on the subject property, the tanks shall be removed in accordance with the requirements of the Newport Beach Fire Department and the Orange County Health Care Agency Environmental Health Division. That prior to the issuance of demolition permits for onsite structures, all asbestos and other regulated hazardous or toxic material shall be removed from the site in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Environmental Protection Agency and any other state or local requirements. Respectfully submitted, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICIOR, Director By • Craig T. B ell Senior P er City Council Meeting November 26. 1990 Agenda Item No. D-1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A Request for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds (Public Hearingl Request to consider the granting of $50,000 of CDBG funds, $2,500 of 15 9-90 unused Social Service funding; $38,901 of 1989-90 funds previously allocated to New Housing Construction; $1,000 of 1990-91 funds previously allocated to New Housing Construction; and $7;599 of 1990-91 funds previously allocated to Administration; to assist with the development of a 14 unit apartment for low income persons and families and accepting a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). B. Site Plan Review No 60 (Public Hearing) Request to approve a site plan review for the purpose of permitting a residential density bonus of 6 units within an affordable housing development containing a total of 14 units on property located in the MFR (2178) District. In accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code, the applicant is also requesting an adjustment to the off-street parking requirement and the minimum dwelling unit size as incentives for the development of affordable housing. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow the construction of open carports on the front one- half of the lot, where the Zoning Code restricts open carports to the rear one-half of the site; and the acceptance of an environmental document. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 715, First Addition to the Newport Mesa Tract, located at 1530 Placentia Avenue, on the easterly side of Placentia Avenue, between 15th Street and Production Place, in Northwest Newport. ZONE: MFR (2178) APPLICANTS: Lawrence M. Campeau and James G. White, Jr., Costa Mesa OWNERS: George and Margaret Wilson, Pasadena b TO: City Council - 2. Suggested Action Hold hearing; close hearing; if desired, a) Adopt Resolution No. . approving a grant of $50,000 of CDBG funds, $42,401 from fiscal year 1989-90 funds and $8,599 from fiscal year 1990-91 funds, to assist with the development of a 14 units apartment at 1530 Placentia Avenue, for low income persons and families and accepting a Finding of No Significant Impact. 02 GO b) Adopt Resolution No. . granting a density bonus and other incentives in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code, and accepting the Environmental Document. Planning Commission Recommendation At its meeting of October 18, 1990, the Planning Commission unanimously approved Resolution No. 1237, recommending City Council approval of Site Plan Review No. 60 for a density bonus and other incentives and acceptance of the Environmental Document. Copies of Planning Commission the staff report, Resolution No. 1237, and an excerpt of the minutes are attached to this staff report. Application In addition to Site PIan Review No. 60 discussed in the Planning Commission staff report, this application also involves a request for the approval of a $50,000 grant of CDBG funds. Environmental Significance Since this development involves federal CDBG funds, an Environmental Assessment Checklist was also prepared for this project in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). It has been determined that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was made and the environmental document was included in the Planning Commission staff report. CDBG Funding It is proposed that the $50,000 of CDBG be provided from the following sources: a $2,500 of 1989-90 unused Social Service funding previously allocated to the Assessment and Treatment Services Center (A.T.S.C.). A.T.S.C. did not keep TO: City Council - 3. adequate service records to receive their funding allocation. Both the subagent contract and a verbal explanation of its content identified A.T.S.C. reporting requirements. Reporting requirements are imposed on all subagents to enable the City to fulfill its mandatory reporting requirement to HUD. Since the service information was not kept and the funding allocation cannot be paid, it is proposed that the $2,500 be reallocated to this project. A copy of a letter sent to A.T.S.C. concerning their funding is attached. • In 1989 and 1990, the Council allocated funding to New Housing Construction. The funding was allocated for either a countywide effort to provide housing for the ho neless or a low income development proposal in Newport Beach. Currently, $° 1,901 is available for this activity. Since a countywide program to pool the CDBG funds of local agencies has not been developed, staff recommends that the $39,901 be used to assist this development. • It is also proposed to reallocate $7,599 of 1990-91 administration funds to this project. These funds are available because of savings that have occurred during the first half of the program year. As discussed in the Planning Commission staff report, it was anticipated that the applicant would apply for $30,000 of 1991-92 CDBG funds to accumulate the $200,000 of requested assistance. Since the four off -site affordable units for the 28th Street Marina project are to be located in this development, the Planning Commission, at its meeting of November 8, 1990, amended the requirement for the payment of park dedication fees at the off -site location. The amendment changed the condition to say as long as residential units are not constructed, park dedication fees need not be paid. The applicant for the 28th Street Marina development has paid the "saved" park fees to Mesa Development, thereby eliminating the need for the 1991-92 CDBG application for $30,000. Letters documenting the payment and abrogating any further request for CDBG funds involving this development are attached. Proposed Deletion of Condition No.7 of Site Plan Review No. 60 As shown on the attached site plan, the vehicular access to the proposed development is provided by a shared driveway with the adjoining apartment development to the north which is also owned by the applicants. Said driveway will be established under a reciprocal easement for ingress, egress and parking purposes. The proposed access drive will maintain a total width of 34.5 feet which will provide sufficient width to allow five additional parallel parking spaces on the northerly side of the drive. Because of the shared access and parking relationship with the adjoining property, staff suggested the following two conditions which the Planning Commission imposed in conjunction with their October 18, 1990 approval of Site Plan Review No. 60: 6. That prior to the issuance of building permits the applicants shall record a reciprocal easement for ingress, egress and parking purposes, over the TO: City �Council - 4. southerly 26.5 feet of the adjoining property at 1538 Placentia Avenue and the northerly 8 feet of the subject property. The final design and location of the easement shall be subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. 7. That prior to the issuance of building permits the applicants shall record a covenant to hold the subject property and the adjoining property at 1538 Placentia Avenue as a single site for the duration of the shared access, parking and circulation arrangement associated with the two properties. Although the adjoining property at 1538 Placentia Avenue is owned by the applicants, said development is financed by a separate lender who will have to subordinate the covenant to hold the properties as a single building site which is required in Condition No. 7. Inasmuch as the lender may have some objections to such a limitation on the future sale of the subject property should a foreclosure occur, the applicants are requesting that Condition No. 7 be deleted. Condition No. 7 was not suggested by staff out of necessity, but rather out of practicality, inasmuch as common ownership of the two properties would eliminate any possibility for future conflicts between the two parcels, along with the fact that the applicants did not originally indicate any objections to such a condition. Since condition No. 6 requires the establishment of an easement for ingress, egress and parking within the common driveway; staff has no objections to the elimination of Condition No. 7. Respectfully submitted, PLANNING 'DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director By Craig T. 1411 PrinciparC2 er JM\CCSR\SPR 1. Resolution No. _, approving $50,000 CDBG grant of funds. 2. Resolution No. _, granting a density bonus and other incentives. 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1237. 4. October 18, 1990 Planning Commission Staff Report. 5. Excerpt of October 18, 1990 Planning Commission Minutes. 6. Letter to A.T.S.C. 7. Newcomb Development Letter. 8. Mesa Development Letter. 9. Site Plan. Attar W2�i-t No. 1 I' RESOLUTION NO. _ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AUTHORIZING FISCAL YEAR 1989-1990 AND 1990-1991 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) ENTITLEMENT FUNDS TO ASSIST LOWER INCOME HOUSING CONSTRUCTION AND ACCEPTING A FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI). WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach has adopted a Housing Element as part of its General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach is making a good faith effort to implement the policies and programs contained in the General Plan Housing Element; and WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to benefit low and moderate income households; and WHEREAS, $2,500 of 1989-1990 CDBG funds allocated to Social Services was not spent and the City desires to reallocate these funds to assist low income housing construction;_ and WHEREAS, $7,599 of 1990-1991 CDBG funds allocated to administration was "saved" and the City desires to reallocate these funds to assist low income housing construction; and WHEREAS, the City allocated $39,901 of its 1989-1990 and 1990-1991 CDBG funds to assist new housing construction; and WHEREAS, Mesa Development Company has indicated their willingness and capability to construct 14 low income housing units at 1530 Placentia Avenue if the City assists with land acquisition; and WHEREAS, the City prepared an Environmental Review Record which determined that the project does not significantly impact the quality of the human environment and accordingly the City decided not to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (PL 91-190); and WHEREAS, the City published said Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and a Request for Release of Funds in a newspaper of general circulation on October 1, 1990, and gave citizens 15 days to submit comments as required by Federal Regulations and received no comments; and WHEREAS, the United States Department of Housing and Development has received no objection to the release of funds or the environmental certification. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a Finding of No Significant Impact on the Environment is made and accepted for the project as documented in the Environmental Review Record and properly published pursuant to NEPA regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach that $41,401 of the 1989-1990 Community Development Block Grant funds and $8,599 of 1990-1991 Community Development Block Grant funds be allocated to Mesa Development Company for the housing development at 1530 Placentia Avenue, subject to approval of development plans by the City and execution and recording of an Affordable Housing Agreement and Grant Deed. -1- 1-`1 ,.v, r t znchment No. 2 �00 'pu RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH APPROVING SITE PLAN REVIEW NO.60 FOR A DENSITY BONUS REQUEST OF MESA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING A FOURTEEN UNIT APARTMENT AT 1530 PL.ACENTIA AVENUE AFFORDABLE TO LAW INCOME FAMILIES FOR A PERIOD OF THIRTY YEARS AND ACCEPTING THE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT. WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach has adopted a Housing Element as part of its General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Housing Element of the Newport Beach General Plan has established policies pertaining to the providing of housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community; and WHEREAS, these policies include providing Incentives within the limitation of available resources; and WHEREAS, the development of rental housing affordable to low income persons and families is a goal established in the Housing Element of the Newport Beach General Plan; and WHEREAS, Section 65915 of the California Government Code provides for approval of a density bonus and other incentives for affordable housing developments; and WHEREAS, the Mesa Development Company development provides all 14 units as affordable units to low income persons and families for a period of thirty years; and WHEREAS, the proposed 14 units affordable to low income persons and families will assist the City in achieving its goal of providing housing for all income segments of the community; and WHEREAS, the number of units provided and the 30 year term of affordability justify the granting of a 57% density bonus and other incentives; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach has recommended that the City Council approve the density bonus and other incentives and certify the Environmental Document. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach that the environmental document is accepted with the following Findings: That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and Council Policy K 3. 2. That the contents of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project. 3. That based on the information contained in .the Initial Study, comments received, and all related documents, there is no substantial evidence that the project (as conditioned or as modified by mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study) could have a significant effect on the environment. - 1 - ID D I10 I La NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach that a density bonus and other incentives are hereby granted to the Mesa Development Company to build a 14 unit apartment at 1530 Placentia Avenue subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans, and elevations except as noted below. 2. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 3. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. 4. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 5. That the on -site vehicular and pedestrian circulation system be subject to further review by the Public Works Department and the City Traffic Engineer. 6. That prior to the issuance of Building Permits the applicants shall record a reciprocal easement for ingress, egress and parking purposes, over the southerly 26.5 feet of the adjoining property at 1538 Placentia Avenue and the northerly 8 feet of the subject property. The final design and location of the easement shall be subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. 7. That arrangements be made with the Puolic Works Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 8. That the unused drive apron be removed and replaced with curb, gutter and a full width sidewalk which shall be constructed along the Placentia Avenue frontage under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 9. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Public Works Department, along with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain facilities for the on -site improvements prior to the issuance of grading permits or building permits. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. 10. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. 11. That disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. 12. That overhead utilities sewing the site shall be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code. 13. No construction, storage or delivery of materials shall be stored within the Placentia Avenue right-of-way and that an 8 foot wide pedestrian walkway be provided at all times except when the new sidewalk is actually being placed. .2- h ti4 14. That water services be provided per Costa Mesa Consolidated Water District Standards. 15. That any proposed landscaping or signs adjacent to the public right-of-way shall be approved by the Public Works Department. 16. That the occupancy of the four SRO style studio units shall be limited to one person each. 17. That the waiver of the Fair Share fee shall be subject to the City Council approval. 18. That development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit to be approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 19, That a grading plan shall include a complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities, to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants. 20. The siltation control plan shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, watering, and sweeping program designed to minimize impact of haul operations. 21. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the prepared plan). 22. The landscape plan shall place heavy emphasis on the use of drought -resistant native vegetation and be irrigated with a system designed to avoid surface runoff and over -watering. 23. That the lighting system shall be designed and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed electrical engineer; with a letter stating that this requirement has been met. 24. That the applicant shall enter into a Grant Deed and an Affordable Housing Agreement, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, guaranteeing that ten (10) 2-bedroom units within the project shall be made available on a preferential basis to persons and families possessing an "active" Section 8 Existing Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section 8 Fair Market Rent (FMR) Schedule for Newport Beach. That the 4 SRO units shall be rented by individuals that makes no more than 30% of the Orange County median income as established on the State's Section 6932 income limits table and rented for no more than 30% of that income. That the SRO rents may be adjusted upward relative to increases in the median income on the State's Section 6932 income table. Section 8 Certificate and Voucher holders may rent the 4 SRO units but not on a preferential basis. When a Section 8 tenant does not occupy a 2-bedroom unit, the unit shall be rented.to persons and families earning a maximum income of no more than 80 percent of the median income for Newport Beach adjusted for family size as shown on the Section 6932 Income Limits Table at or below the HUD Fair Market rent. Said Grand Deed and Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded with -3- q 4- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial Study in making its decision on the proposed development; and WHEREAS, based upon the information contained in the Initial Study, it has been determined that the project as mitigated will not have a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach recommends to the•City Council certification of the environmental document and approval of Site Plan Review No. 60 for a density bonus subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans, and elevations except as noted below. 2. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 3. ' That all tiash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. 4. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 5. That the on -site vehicular and pedestrian circulation system be subject to further review by the Public Works Department and the City Traffic Engineer. 6. That prior to the issuance of Building Permits the applicants shall record a reciprocal easement for ingress, egress and parking purposes, over the southerly 26.5 feet of the adjoining property at 1538 Placentia Avenue and the northerly 8 feet of the subject property. Tl• final design and location of the easement shall be subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. 7. That prior to the issuance of Building Permits the applicants shall record a Covenant to hold the subject property and the adjoining property at 1538 Placentia Avenue as a single site for the duration of the shared access, parking and circulation arrangement associated with the two properties. 8. That arrangements be made with the Public Works Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 9. That the unused drive apron be removed and replaced with curb, gutter and a full width sidewalk which shall be constructed along the Placentia Avenue frontage under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 10. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Public Works Department, along with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain facilities for the on -site improvements prior to the issuance of grading permits or building permits. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. -2- /7• 11. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. 12. That disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic r; control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. 13. That overhead utilities serving the site shall be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code. 14. No construction, storage or delivery of materials shall be stored within the Placentia Avenue right-of-way and that an 8 foot wide pedestrian walkway be provided at all times except when the new sidewalk is actually being placed. 15. That water services be provided per Costa Mesa Consolidated Water District Standards. 16. That any proposed landscaping or signs adjacent to the public right-of-way shall be approved by the Public Works Department. 17. That the occupancy of the four SRO style studio units shall be limited to one person each. 18. That the waiver of the Fair Share fee shall be subject to the City Council approval. 19. That development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit to be approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 20. That a grading plan shall include a complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities, to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants. 21. The siltation control plan shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, watering, and sweeping program designed to minimize impact of haul operations. 22. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared.by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the prepared plan). 23. The landscal • plan shall place heavy emphasis on the use of drought -resistant native veget. ion and be irrigated with a system designed to avoid surface runoff and over -watering. 24. That the lighting system shall be designed and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a . licensed electrical engineer; with a letter stating that this requirement has been met. 25. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, guaranteeing that ten (10) 2-bedroom units within the project shall -3- be made available on a preferential basis to persons and families possessing an "active" Section 8 Existing Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section 8 Fair Market Rent (FMR) Schedule for Newport Beach. That the 4 SRO units shall be rented by individuals that makes no more than 3090 of the Orange County median income as established on the State's Section 6932 income limits table and rented for no more than 3090 of that income. That the SRO rents may be adjusted upward relative to increases in the median income on the State's Section 6932 income table. Section 8 Certificate and Voucher holders may rent the 4 SRO units but not on a preferential basis. When a Section 8 tenant does not occupy a 2-bedroom unit, the unit shall be rented to persons and families earning a maximum income of no more than 80 percent of the median income for Newport Beach adjusted for family size as shown on the Section 6932 Income Limits Table at or below the HUD Fair Market rent. Said Grand Deed and Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. The term of this agreement shall be for no more than thirty (30) years. 22. That the project shall be redesigned so as to provide a minimum 5.192 foot side yard setback. ADOPTED this _ day of 1989, by the following vote, to wit: BY Janice Debay, Chairman IM. Thomas C Edwards, Secretary BILL-MRMPR _4_ AYES NOES ABSENT Attachment 1V0. µ U Planning Commission keting October 18. 1990 Agenda Item No. 3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Site Plan Review No 60 (Public Hearinel Request to approve a site plan review for the purpose of permitting a residential density bonus of 6 units within an affordable housing development containing a total of 14 units on property located in the MFR (2178) District. In accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code, the applicant is also requesting an adjustment to the off-street parking requirement and the minimum dwelling unit size as incentives for the development of affordable housing. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow the construction of open carports on the front one- half of the lot, where the Zoning Code restricts open carports to the rear one-half of the site; and the acceptance of an environmental document. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 715, First Addition to the Newport Mesa Tract, located 1530 Placentia Avenue, on the easterly side of Placentia Avenue, between 15th Street and Production Place, in the Northwest Newport. ZONE: MFR (2178) APPLICANTS: Lawrence M. Campeau and James G. White, Jr., Pasadena OWNERS: George and Margaret Wilson, Pasadena Application The application described above will, if approved, allow construction of a fourteen unit affordable housing development which includes a density bonus of six units as part of an affordable housing agreement on property located in the MFR (2178) District. In accordance with Section 20.01.070 C., of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, projects which include a residential density bonus are subject to the approval of a site plan review. In accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code, the applicant is also requesting an adjustment to the off-street parking requirement and the minimum dwelling unit size as incentives for the development of affordable housing. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow the construction of open carports E To: Pia*ug Commission - 2. t on the front one-half of the lot, where the Zoning Code restricts open carports to the rear one-half of the site. Site plan review procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.01 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and modification procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.81. Environmental Significance In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and City Policy, an Initial Study has been prepared for the project. Based upon the information contained in the Initial Study, it has been determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration has, therefore, been prepared for the consideration of the Planning Commission. The project has also been reviewed under the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) which has resulted in a Finding of No Significant Effect (FONSE). This review was required because of the use of Federal assistance. Conformance with_the �enerai Plan The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the site for "Multi -Family Residential' uses and permits a residential density of one dwelling unit for each 2,178 square feet of buildable lot area. Notwithstanding the requested density bonus of six units, the subject property, which contains 19,388 square feet of buildable acreage, would permit up to eight units. Provided the requested density bonus is approved, the proposed 14 unit project would be consistent with the provisions of the General Plan. Subject Property and Surrounding Land Uses The subject property is currently developed with a welding shop, general storage and a cabinet shop, all of which will be removed in order to accommodate the subject project. To the north, is a 26 unit apartment complex which is currently owned by the applicants; to the east, is a medical office condominium; to the south, is a portion of the parking area for the medical office and convenience store which fronts on to Placentia Avenue; and to the west, across Placentia Avenue, is an apartment development. Analysis The applicants are proposing to construct a two story, 14 unit apartment project on the subject property. Said development will include ten two bedroom units containing 911± square feet (gross) each, and four SRO (single room occupancy) style units containing 455± square feet (gross) each. The following outline sets forth the major characteristics of the proposed. project: Land Area: (64.94 feet x 298.55 feet) 19,388± sq.ft. Buildable Area: (lot area minus setbacks) 14,649± sq.ft. ly Piar("ug Commission - 3. i� Permitted Dwelling Units: (As established by General Plan and MFR District) Proposed Dwelling Units: Permitted Gross Structural Area: (1.75 x Buildable Area by MFR District) Proposed Gross Structural Area (excludes all required covered parking: Proposed Floor Area Ratio (excluding all required covered parking: Building Setbacks: Front: (Placentia Ave.) Southerly Side: Northerly Side: Rear: 8 units or 1 D.U. for each 2,178 sq.ft. of lot area 14 units or 1 D.U. for each 1,385± sq.ft. of lot area 25,636± sq.ft. 10,930± sq.ft. .746 x Buildable Area Required Proposed 20 ft. Varies between 20 ft. and 34 ft. 5.1952 ft. 5.1952 ft. 10 ft. Dwelling Unit Size: (interior floor area) 600 sq.ft. Off -Street Parking: 2.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit, or 35 parking spaces Open Space: 87,894 cu.ft. total 43,947 cu.ft. open to sky 21,973 cu.ft. at rear 21,973 cu.ft. at front 19.94 ft. for building; 6.94 ft. for decks. Varies between 5 ft.' and 8ft. 20 ft. 10 units @ 859± sq ft. 4 SRO units @ 434± sq.ft. 24 tenant parking spaces and 5 guest parking spaces, or 29 parking spaces 171,425± cu.ft. total 164,625± cu.ft. open 21,973± cuft at rear 21.973± cu.ft.at front 'The applicants have indicated that they will make the necessary changes to the project so as to comply with the required side yard setback. 4 /I TO: PlanNo Commission - 4. eloop Building Height for MFR District: 28 ft. average roof 25± ft. average; 30± height and 33 ft. ft. max ridge height maximum ridge height measured from existing grade' Site Plan Review Considerations A Site Plan Review is required in conjunction with the approval -of a Residential Density Bonus. The review of site plans have specific standards of review as established in Section 20.01.070 F of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Many of the standards of judgement for the review of site plans relate to sites which have unique environmental or scenic resources, which do not apply to this site. These are Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11 and 12. The remaining standards are listed below, with a brief discussion of the project as it relates to each. 2. Development shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood and surrounding sites and shall not be detrimental to the orderly and harmonious development of the surroundings and of the City. The project site is immediately adjacent to a multi -family residential project which has a similar density to the proposed project (approximately 30 units per acre). 7. Site plan and layout of buildings, parking areas, pedestrian and vehicular access ways, and other site features shall give proper consideration to functional aspects of site development. The quality of the site plan is greatly influenced by the dwelling unit entry ways facing an expanded side yard adjacent to the southerly property line. The expanded southerly side yard setback also provides the opportunity for private patios and decks for each of the apartment units along with substantial landscaped areas between buildings and a large play area. The proposed design also allows a shared driveway arrangement with the adjoining apartment development which provides for a more efficient development. The site plan also makes provision for adequate sight distance from Placentia Avenue and will fully conform with all other setback requirements. The openness of the project is demonstrated by the amount of open space being provided in excess of the minimum open space requirement. 8. Development shall be consistent with specific General Plan and applicable Specific Area Plan policies and objectives, and shall not preclude the implementation of those policies and objectives. As discussed in the General Plan Compliance section, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and it is not located within a specific area plan. 'Building height indicated assumes a finished grade that is approximately 3 feet higher than existing grade so as to ensure adequate site drainage. r Pl(�ing Commission - 5. 10. When feasible, electrical and similar mechanical equipment and trash and storage areas shall be concealed. The trash enclosure for the project is located at the rear of the site. Proposed Dwelline Unit Size In accordance with Section 20.87.140 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all dwelling units constructed after August 24, 1972 must contain a minimum of 600 square feet of floor area within the surrounding walls of the building. As indicated in the above outline, the four proposed SRO style units will contain only 434± square feet. The applicants' justification for the reduced square footage is that these units will be made available to "very low" income persons and will rent for only $350.00 per month. Such a proposal is to the benefit of the City inasmuch as the applicants could develop the same floor area contained in two SRO units into a single two bedroom apartment which could rent for $826.00 per month which is more than the $700.00 per month generated by the two SRO units. It should also be noted that the applicants have also agreed to restrict the occupancy of the SRO units to one person. Off -Street Parking and Vehicular Access In accordance with the MFR District, the off-street parking requirement for projects containing four or more dwelling units is 2.5 parking spaces per dwelling.unit of which at least 0.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit shall be provided for guest parking. Based on this parking formula, 35 parking spaces are required for the proposed project. As indicated on the attached site plan, the applicant is proposing 24 on -site parking spaces for the project tenants and 5 guest parking spaces which are located on the northerly side of the shared driveway on the adjoining property. Based on this arrangement, there are a total of 29 additional parking spaces for the proposed 14 unit project. Said parking would provide 2.5 parking spaces for each of the 10 two bedroom units (25 spaces) and i parking space for each of the 4 SRO style units (4 spaces). In light of the applicants' proposal to limit the occupancy of the SRO units to a one person, staff has no objections to the proposed parking arrangement. As indicated on the attached site plan, vehicular access to the proposed , welopment is provided by a shared driveway with the adjoining apartment development to "ie north. Said driveway will be established under a reciprocal easement for ingress, egress and parking purposes. The proposed access drive will maintain a total width of 34.5 feet which will provide sufficient width to allow parallel parking on the northerly side of the drive. Staff has reviewed the proposed access and circulation plan with the Fire Department and they have no objections. Proposed Carports on the Front One -Half of the Property In accordance with Section 20.87.260 of the Municipal Code, covered parking spaces, located on the front one-half of a lot, are required to have side walls and an operating garage door. Ili TO: P14ng Commission - 6. ' As shown on the attached plans, the applicant is proposing to locate 12 covered parking spaces on the front one-half of the property which do not have operating garage doors and side walls in every case. Staff has no objections to such a design inasmuch as the parking spaces are not highly visible from the public street. It is staffs further opinion that inasmuch as the development is an affordable housing project, the cost involved in providing garage doors and side walls on 12 of the 24 covered off-street parking spaces, is not justified by any increased visual appeal that might result from the installation of garage doors. Densi , Bonus Section 65915 of the California Government Code requires cities to grant a density bonus over the otherwise maximum allowable residential density under the applicable Zoning Ordinance and Land Use- Element of the General Plan and at least one other. incentive when a developer agrees to construct at least (1) 20 percent of the total units of a housing development for persons and families earning 8090 or less of the area median income as established by the State, (2) 10 percent of the total units of a housing development at the State very low income standard (609o' or less of area median income), or (3) 50 percent of the total units for senior citizens. The Government Code does not permit a city to deny a request for a density bonus which is at least a 25% increase in the number of dwelling units permitted. Further, the Government Code permits a city to grant density bonuses in excess of 25% in instances when it is determined to be necessary to achieve the City's affordable housing goals. As indicated previously, the current MFR (2178) zoning of the property permits one unit for each 2,178 sq.ft. of land area or 8.9 units. Based upon the proposed 14 unit project to be located on the 19,388 square foot parcel, the applicant is requesting a density of 1 unit for each 1,385 square feet of lot area or 31.45 units per acre, which represents a 57% density bonus. This density bonus is similar to other affordable housing projects which have been previously approved in accordance with the City's affordable housing goals. The proposed project will provide 14 low income units as established by the State standard for a period of 30 years. The affordability standards and time period will be established in an affprdable housing agreement and Grant Deed'which will be recorded against the property. The proposed affordability criteria and number of affordable units meets the State standards for granting a density bonus. Community Development Block Grant Funds The applicant has requested $200,000.00 in financial assistance. On a per unit basis this request is consistent with previous requests,'as are the other requested incentives. The City usually provides this assistance with its CDBG funds. Due to the large commitment of funding for the last CDBG project, the City has only $50,000 in CDBG funds currently available. The applicant is aware of the availability of funds. 0 .61 rTo; Pla �,`'ig Commission - 7. Staff was approached by the applicant and Newcomb Development Company with a proposal that would provide $120,000 of the requested funding for this project. It is proposed that the four affordable units required for the 28th Street Marina Project and which are to, be located on the Newport Boulevard traffic island, adjacent to Cannery Village, be transferred to the subject site. In exchange, Newcomb Development would provide $120,000 of the requested $200,000. In addition to assisting with funding of the project, this proposal has several advantages. The proposal removes the four affordable units required by the Coastal Residential Development Permit for the 28th Street Marina development from the traffic island to a more desirable location for residential development. It provides a place for the provision of the affordable units required 'by the Coastal Residential Development Permit. It enables all 14 units in the'project to be affordable. With only $80,000 of CDBG funds, the applicant has indicated that only 10 of the units could be affordable with 4 at market rate. Staff had an Economic Feasibility Study prepared on the proposal to provide the affordable units on the traffic island site (copy attached). As shown in the study, it is not economically feasible to provide the 4 units on the traffic island site nor is it possible to provide them on the 28th Street Marina site. In the event of this type of economic infeasibility, Section 65590(d) of the Government Code permits the City to require that the units be located in the City either within the Coastal Zone or within three miles of the Coastal Zone. This site is within three miles of the Coastal Zone. In order to satisfy the various project and program requirements, four of the lower income two -bedroom units will be allocated to satisfy the affordable housing requirement for the 28th Street Marina project; six two -bedroom units and 2 SRO units will be allocated to satisfy the requirements of HUD; and the two remaining SRO units will be allocated to satisfy the State density bonus requirement. Depending on the availability of CDBG funds and project timing, the applicant understands that they could apply for up to $30,000.00 of additional CDBG funds in the 1991-92 year. Use of Section 8 Certificate or Vouchers The applicant is also proposing to preferentially rent all ten of the two bedroom units in accordance with the Section 8 rental assistance program using the fair market rent schedule established by HUD. This preferential rent program will be incorporated in the requirements of the affordable housing agreement. Under this requirement, the 10 units will be preferentially rented to very low income tenants as established by federal standards. The four SRO units will be rented for $228.00 below the permitted Section 8 fair market rent for that size unit. General Plan Housing Element The Housing Element of the General Plan sets forth the housing goals, policies and objectives of the City. The City's established goals for housing are formulated around two Zi Plal*,Ig Commission - 8. concepts. First, the physical and visual character of the City's residential neighborhoods are the key to the provision of a quality living environment. Second, the City's housing stock must provide for the housing needs of all present and future residents of the City. In addition, Section 65538(c) of the California Government Code requires the Housing Element of all cities to "... make adequate provision for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community,.." The specific goals of the City regarding the provision of housing for all economic segments of the City's population that pertain to the proposed development, as set forth in the Housing Element on pages 83 and 84 are: 112. To provide a balanced community, with a variety of housing types and designs and housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community: very low and lower income as well as moderate and upper income. 4. To preserve and increase affordability, through rental housing, for very low and lower income." The basic policies which describe the City's role in the attainment of affordable housing are: 11 1. Enabling private industry to function more effectively, as a result of constraints being eliminated, wherever feasible, and allowable density being increased. 4. Providing incentives and direct assistance to industry, within the limitations of available resources, to facilitate the provision of housing for very low, lower, and moderate income." Various housing programs were formulated and adopted to achieve the aforementioned goals in accordance with City housing policies. Implementation plans and target dates for these housing programs are also set forth in the Housing Element. Housing Program No. 3 (page 93) is: "To promote and assist in the development of housing for low and moderate income households." The Implementation Plan for Program No. 3 is set forth on pages 93- 95 of the Housing Element. The specific activities of the Implementation Plan that pertain to this development proposal are as follows: "a. The City shall continue to apply for and use its entitlement funds under the Community Development Block Grant program to facilitate the development and construction of housing for lower and very low income households. To the extent that developers and landowners are willing to cooperate in this endeavor, the highest priority for the use of these funds shall be for the development and construction of housing affordable to "very low income" households. This maybe accomplished by using the City's current and future Community Development Block Grant funds for the acquisition of land for the development of housing for very low income households, or by "writing down" the cost of land for developers who have agreed to develop low income housing. In this regard, the Newport Beach Planning Department shall ,i a " yy : P1aYpg Commission - 10. 46 project depends in part on the waiver of said fee. It is staffs opinion that the subject project represents a significant contribution to the affordable housing opportunities in the City and that the waiver of the Fair Share Fee in this case will increase the feasibility of the subject project. Conclusions and Specific Findings Should the Planning Commission desire to approve this proposal, • the actions and corresponding Finding and Conditions set forth in the attached Exhibit W are suggested along with the attached Resolution No. - pertaining to the requested residential density bonus. The site plan of the project does not pose any problems upon which to base findings for denial; therefore, staff has not included an exhibit for denial. However, should information be presented at the public hearing which supports the denial of the project, the Planning Commission way wish to take such an action. PLANNING DEPARTMENT TAMES D. HEWICKER, Director I �� j it art, Attachments: Exhibit 'W' Vicinity Map Letter from applicants Resolution No. Negative Declaration NEPA Finding of No Significant Effect Affordable Housing Feasibility Study Rent Benefit Study Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations BILL-W\UP\SPR60 F a TO: Plai6bg Commission - 11. ro EXHIBIT "A" FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 60 AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT A. Environmental Document: Accept the environmental document with the following findings and mitigation measures: Findings: 1. That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and Council Policy K-3. 2. That the contents of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project. 3. That based on the information contained in the Initial Study, comments received, and all related documents, there is no substantial evidence that the project (as conditioned or as modified by mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study) could have a significant effect on the environment. Mitigation Measures. 1. That development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit to be approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 2. That a grading plan shall include a complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities, to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants. 3. The siltation control plan shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, watering, and sweeping program designed to minimize impact of haul operations. 4. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the prepared plan). 7-1 role Plan 3rg Commission - 12. 5. The landscape plan shall place heavy emphasis on the use of drought -resistant native vegetation and be irrigated with a system designed to avoid surface runoff and over -watering. 6. That the lighting system shall be designed and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed electrical engineer; with a letter stating that this requirement has been met. B. Site Plan Review No. 60: Approve Site Plan Review No. 60 with the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. That the proposed use is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. That the design of the development or the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed development. 3. That adequate off-street parking and related vehicular circulation are being provided in conjunction with the proposed development. 4. That the proposed development will not preclude implementation of specific General Plan or Specific Area Plan objectives and policies. 5. The approval of Site Plan Review No. 60 will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. 6. The approval of the requested modification, so as to allow the use of open carports on the front one-half of the property will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of 7,6 . Plating Commission - 13. (i`j persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans, and elevations except as noted below. 2. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall' be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 3. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. 4. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. S. That the on -site vehicular and pedestrian circulation system be subject to further review by the Public Works Department and the City Traffic Engineer. 6. That prior to the issuance of building permits the applicants shall record a reciprocal easement for ingress, egress and parking purposes, over the southerly 26.5 feet of the adjoining property at 1538 Placentia Avenue and the northerly 8 feet of the subject property. The final design and location of the easement shall be subject to the approval of the City Traffic Fngineer. 7. 1_iat prior to the issuance of building permits the applicants shall record a Covenant to hold the subject property and the adjoining property at 1538 Placentia Avenue as a single site for the duration of the shared access, parking and circulation arrangement associated with the two properties. 8. That arrangements be made with the Public Works Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. Plk;ing Commission - 14.� 9. That the unused drive apron be removed and replaced with curb, gutter and a full width sidewalk which shall be constructed along the Placentia Avenue frontage under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 10. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Public Works Department, along with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain facilities for the on -site improvements prior to the issuance of grading permits or building permits. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the .developer. 11. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. 12. That disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. 13. That overhead utilities serving the site shall be undergrounded to the _nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code. 14. No construction, storage or delivery of materials shall be stored within the Placentia Avenue right-of-way and that an 8 foot wide pedestrian walkway be provided at all times except when the new sidewalk is actually being placed. 15. That water services be provided per Costa Mesa Consolidated Water District Standards. 16. That any proposed landscaping or signs adjacent to the public right-of-way shall be approved by the Public Works Department. 17. That the occupancy of the four SRO style studio units shall be limited to one person each. 18. That at least one covered parking space shall be provided for each dwelling unit. A 1 n F Pla�ng Commission - 15.E 0-0000 19. That the waiver of the Fair Share fee shall be subject to City Council approval. 20. Approval of the Residential Density Bonus and adoption of Resolution No. 21. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, guaranteeing that ten (10) 2-bedroom units within the project shall be made available on a preferential basis to persons and families possessing an "active" Section 8 Existing Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section 8 Fair Market Rent (FMR) Schedule for Newport Beach. That the 4 SRO units shall be rented by individuals that makes no more than 30% of the Orange County median income as established on the State's Section 6932 income limits table and rented for no more than 30% of that income. That the SRO rents may be adjusted upward relative to increases in the median income on the State's Section 6932 income table. Section 8 Certificate and Voucher holders may rent the 4 SRO units but not on a preferential basis. When a Section 8 tenant does not occupy a . 2-bedroom unit, the unit shall be rented to persons and families earning a maximum income of no more than 80 percent of the median income for Newport Beach adjusted for family size as shown on the Section 6932 Income Limits Table at or below the HUD Fair Market rent. Said Grand Deed and Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. The term of this agreement shall be for no more than thirty (30) years. 22. That the p -oject shall be redesigned so as to provide a minimum 5. 92 foot side yard setback. ;0 z 4? to dc + i RO , A = P i t le J PZ5 MI ..I 1h M _ M .!M'IrY h AMI.W IR <W OP NG AYi a OAS S t SAL[ °I IttT w Al i Z ceoNVPwraM r,.#^ .C.I T 1{I�r Cirr oP NeMPur pe ci. 'R, G -2 0aE1' c, V C/ a • , i O M-1-A 0 A FR CA (/500/ �.A • � 'R Lul H11 4R/A WAYO� A MFR A-P • " __ Ens1,a P NFR o [ .a•. //SOOI �.[•i PA 4 A-P y etit A P N Q v r XOA° HOSPITAL qMC• A-P eAP A-P-H A-P P'C DISTRICTING MAP z�M INPORT BEACH --CALIFORNIA I 11FOdR.YOVCRLIYZOYE F$-S9 PEyTro pnTRE NW0.Y PLI1DENil..l SINGLE PAMLY RESOCUTOU. © n; wLmmeCOMMER" DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL AL CDI#AMCIAL ARR.TmLE FAM0.yef3MEWIAL� MANUFACTURING Come DISTRIDTS ©© UPICLA331FiFD D DEPTH M Pe°r �......... ._ 17REVIlEw1 / August 8, 1990 Mr. James D. Hewicker Director City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Dear Mr. Hewicker: We at Mesa Development have entered escrow to purchase a 19,388 square foot parcel of land located at 1530 Placentia Avenue in Newport Beach, also known as the West 308.55 feet of Lot 715, First Addition to Newport Mesa Tract, in the County of Orange, as per map recorded in Book 8, Page 61 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Except the North 235.66 feet thereof. Also except the South 30.00 feet thereof. This property is currently designated for "Residential" in the General Plan. We are proposing a fourteen (14) unit project. Ten units will be 2 bedroom, 1 bath and remain affordable for thirty years to lower income families. Four units will be "S.R.O." style bachelor apartments and will remain affordable for 30 years to very low income individuals. In order to achieve the proposed affordability standards, we are requesting that the City: grant us approximately $200,000.00 in financial assistance, waive all Fair Share fees on the project, approve a mo'ification- to the zoning code to permit open covered parki;3 on the front half of the site, grant a density bonus from the prevailing twenty (20) units to the acre to thirty two (32) units to the acre, adjust the offstreet parking requirements from 2.5 spaces per unit to 2.07 spaces per unit and modify the minimum room size requirement on the four "S.R.O." bachelor units. We further request that the City allow the use of Section 8 Certificates or Vouchers and the prevailing Section 8 Fair Market Rent Schedule for the ten 2 bedroom units. However, we understand that the City of Newport Beach does not have $200,000 of C.D.B.G. funds available. Negotiations with John Newcomb Company have resulted in the opportunity r Mesa Development Co., Inc. 1n1r r71,,n7n nnm rAv n7n n11" 111 Aw James D. Hewicke nugust 8, 1990 �J Page Two for $120,000 of the $200,000 necessary to be made availa),10 by transferring the four unit requirement from his 2001 Street marina project to our site. Therefore it is reque0tt'd that this transfer be permitted. It is further 001' understanding that only $50,000 in C.D.B.G. funds AVO available at this time. If it is determined that this development as proposed iti consistent with the City' and residential development housing, please assist us i as soon as possible for th and City Council hearings. project as proposed oraataa or regulations, ple convenience to discus: We are looking forw Newport Beach. Sincerely, Lawrence M. Campeau/ LMC:dh L .'.. e s affordability housing goals' standards concerning affordablO n being placed on the calendar' necessary Planning Commissi011 If it is determined that thiM anu nnnf14 4-c mi+h 1144.. b..li n4 AF1 yf144y;'�- Sly, A Zvi /,c)ilLf6- Z)Wr u d t, Label clear inside dimensions of provided parking spaces Is demolition proposed?_,t �S _���/SST /i 1-n70N #�S Number of units to be demol2.shed/UCL,2 &6!9 S;Wei CA-a)-e-r SNUG 7'oTaL SQG q Fairshare Contribution ✓r San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee /•� Park Dedication Fee SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH: please indicate any discretionary approval numbers on the plans and incorporate the attached; excerpt of minutes and list of findings and conditions into the blueline drawings approval letter into the blueline drawings Modifications Committee: Indicate Approval No. on Plans Modification required for Planning Commission/City Council: Use Permit: No. Variance: No. Resubdivision/Tract: No.--�-r— / err— Site Plan Review: No. Pp(�J1/C� �,%�i/gO Amendment: No. = Other Pu >-I-i.-c-Works: i `o Ease /,F„n �hment Permit ��,'� 6+54 r ACYe%GO7- ubdivision Engineer r� (i/���Jtit/G Traffic Engineer @ �� Approval De Landscape Plane �/y TD Building Department: Grading Engineer f� Parks Department: ____•/�)� Approval of Landscape Plans `. N Coastal Approval Required: Exempt, Because — Categorical Exclusion No. (C.E.O.) Effective DatE (Note: Building permits may be issued 10 days following issuance of C.E.O.) Approval In Concept (AIC) No. (Note: File 3 sets of plans: site, floor, and elevations) Waiver # Effective Date Coastal Development Permit No. Effective Date_ r Miscellaneous 1. Provide floor plan(s), fully dimensioned, showing all room uses. 2. Provide plot plan, fully dime J- -� ' nsioned, showing: location of all buildings, and distance to property lines. 6"%7& b' distance from face of curb to front property line (verify with Public Works) second and third floor footprints (if applicable) all projections (i.e. fireplaces, bay windows), label distance(s) to PL(a) 3. Chimney (and chimney caps etc.) heights permitted only as required by U.B.C. or manufacturer specifications. 4. °Pools, spas, walls fences, patio covens and/ other fr a tandin str turea require separate reviews and permits!' %/[.tC.f�k. e�rCl dlL N 5. Association Approval dvisor Issuance of a Building Permit by the City does not relieve applica�gal requirement to observe covenants, condi- tions and restrictions which may be recorded against the property or to obtain community association approval of plans. NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200. PORIMS\RES-ZON.COR NEWPORT HARBOR APARTMENTS II 2925 College Ave., #A-3 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714) 979-9991 August 16, 1991 City of Newport Beach Planning Department P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92659-1768 RE: 1530 Placentia Avenue Plancheck Number 2568G-90 S.R.O. Units To Whom It May Concern: P1,q^j ��o This letter shall serve as our acknowledgment and our intent to comply with the following conditions of approval. 1. The four S.R.O. units will be rented only to individuals who earn no more than 30% of the Orange County median income as established on the State Section 6932 income limits table. 2. The rent charged these individuals shall not exceed 30% of the Orange County median income as established on the State Section 6932 income limits table. 3. Section 8 Certificate and Voucher holders may rent the four S.R.O. units but not on a preferential basis. If you should have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact the undersigned. Sincerely, Lawrence M. Campeau LMC:dh it �aeo1AORNMENNOV,eosoa1IRVNW&uYiAm����ieiaii�������uiiaiii e RECORDING REDUESTEDBY Recorded atthe request of ° O Larry Campeau ORANGE COAST1ITLE CO. o ��Co`" AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO o, P,M- AUG1219911 °� O Name Newport Harbor Apartments �n(f Official Records °"�� Street 2925 College St., #A-3 V Orange County, California £ u Address city, State & Costa Mesa, CA �C'1 00 Q• `/ n Recorder zl 1p Code 92626 J �.. O I a-1 o SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USEge - EASEMENT GENERAL THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 25th day of February tg 91 by and between Newport Harbor Apartments II whose address is 2925 College Street, Costa Mesa (hereinafter called "Grantor"), and Newport Harbor Apartments whose address is 2925 College Street, Costa Mesa (hereinafter called "Grantee"), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantor owns and has fee simple title to that certain parcel of real property located in the City of Newport Beach , County of Orange State of California legally described as follows: (Here insert legal description of the real property or that portion thereof to be Subject to the easement, right of way or rights desired by the Grantee) As described in EXHIBIT "A" and shown in EXHIBIT "B" This document filedfor record by Orange Coast TitIs Compnny as an accommodation only. It has not been examined as to Its execution or as to he affect AND WHEREAS, the Grantee desires to use said real property for the purpose of" upon the title. '(Insert here nature and type of easement, right-of-way or right desired by the Grantee) vehicle and pedestrian ingress and egress, parking, drainage, and utilities NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed between the parties hereto as follows: The Grantor does hereby grant, assign and set over to the -Grantee" (Insert here nature and type of easement, right-of-way or right granted to Grantee on the real property or any portion thereof) an easement for vehicle and pedestrian ingress and egress, parking, drainage, and utility purposes over that property described in EXHIBIT "A" and shown in EXHIBIT "B" Except as to the rights granted herein, the Grantor shall continue to have the full use, occupancy and enjoyment of said real property, The Grantee hereby agrees to hold and save the Grantor harmless from any and all claims, liability and damages arising from the use, possession and occupancy of the real property as herein granted and hereby further agrees to pay for EASEMENT-GENERAL-WOLGOTTS FORM 792-Rev. 6.83 This standard term Is Intended for IRA hplwl shualkas enceunterad In the Howe field Indiwled. ver, beforeyou 01983 WOLCOTTS, INC. sign, read It, hit In all blinks, andinsa whatever changes we eyyroprMle and necessity to your.paNcular • - _._.. v. `_ _ . . __ _ _ _? _ •._ __ IranfeGYbrl_Cantult a lawyer R you doubt IN lome'i a1MN IIX.yvur purpo» and bee. _ _ .--........._.. [. ___ _` - J -... ._•------"c--" _-� ..: ...ram...,..-.- ._ __ - _ _..7:�'�'' M any and all damage or damages which may occur to the real property, or rights of the Grantor or any other person or property through Grantee's use, occupation and possession of the real property or the rights herein granted. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said easement, right and right-of-way unto the Grantee, his successors or assigns for a period of See EXHIBIT "C" subject to the following specific conditions and restrictions: See EXHIBIT "C" This agreement shall be binding upon and Inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto, and their respective heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this I I-th day of 19�t1 Wayne Freser, General Partner STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF OFFICIAL SEAL DENISE L. HOOD Notary Public -California ^• . ORANGE COUNTY My Comm, Exp. Aug. 30, 1991 ACNNOWLEOGMENT—General or Umileo Parinershill—Wolcolls Form 236CA—Rev 5.82 *1982 WOLCOTTS. INC (price class 8.2) STATE OF COUNTY OF BY: Newport Harbor Apartments II, a California general partnership awrence Campeau, General Partner �es G. White, Jr., Gener Pa tner On this day of Mardi, ardi, , In the year 19L, , personally known to me Is o sates ac ory ) to be the person who executed the within Instrument on b alf of the Partnership named therein, and acknow- ledged to me that the Partnership executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seat. J Notary Public in and for said S a e. Iss. On this day of _ and for said State, perso ally appeared personally known to me (or pkp to the within Instrument, and E WITNESS my hand and official to me on the basis of to me that _he_ Notary Numic In ano mr sale Jrate. in the yet 19_, before me, the undersigt d, a Notary Public in evidence) to be thaperson_ whose name_ subscribed :uted It. \\ Notary Public in and for said Stale. If executed by a Corporation the Corporation Form of Acknowledgment must be used. - EXHIBIT 'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION An easement over the North 8 fleet of the property commonly known at 1530 Placentia Avenue and legally described as follows: The West 308.55 feet of Lot 715 of the First Addition to Newport Mesa Tract, in the City of Newport Beach. County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 8, page 61 of Miscellaneous Maps records of said County. Except the North 235.66 feet thereof and also except the South 30.00 feet thereof. Attached and made a part of is a map designated EXHIBIT 'B'. 16TH I , STREET 3 / Z� 01 0 M 15TH STREET EXHIBI T T.1 J�f J",'J - - r Am 60' S 89'42'00" W 338.55' SCALE _ 308.55' -J-> NEWPORT HARBOR APARTMENTS 1558 PLA CENTIA N 89'42'00" E 338.55, _ 0 308.55' 8' PROPOSED EASEMENT NEWPORT HARBOR APARTMENTS Z 1530 PLA CENTIA 308.55' N 89'42'00" E 338.55' f PREPARED BY: ROBIN B. HAMERS & ASSOC., INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS 234 E. 17TH STREET, SUITE 205 COSTA MESA, CA 92627 (714) 548-1192 ROBIN B. 'HAMERS R.C.E. 31720 )ATE -�0 S/ m �! NO. rr EXPCRE 31720 -) r'71 12'/31/92 OF ci��F EXHIBIT 'C' Said easement over the North 8 feet of the property commonly known as 1530 Placentia Avenue shall be appurtenant to and for the benefit of the property commonly known as 1538 Placentia Avenue and legally described as -Follows: The South 128.66 feet of the North 235.66 fleet of the West 308.55 feet of Lot 715 of the First Addition to Newport Mesa Tract, in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of California. The East line of said Parcel being parallel with and 33B.55' East of the center line of Placentia Avenue, as shown on a map recorded in Book 6, page 61 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said County. Said easement shall remain in full force and effect from execution: shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the heirs, successors and assigns of the Parties, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the respective owners of each property and the City of Newport Beach. CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION TO EASEMENT GEORGE M. WILSON AND MARGARET R. WILSON, TRUSTEES OF THAT TRUST DATED 7/25/75, Beneficiary under that Deed of Trust recorded on 2/8/91 , as Instrument No. 91-58764 of Official Records of Orange County, Calif., hereby consents to the recording of the within Easement, and further subordinates the lien or charge of its Deed of Trust to said Easement. GEORGE M. WILSON AND MARGARET R. WILSON7 TRUSTEES OF THAT TRUST DATED 7/25 75 By: eneficiary) George M. Wilson y )Trustee Margar�t R. Wilson, Trustee 7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) as. J COUNTY OF *moo _Angeles ) On Augtvst 7 1991 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared **GEQRG9 ?4 W1LSr"W ADIB--I'11iRdoi1l+.ET P W115 DNA* personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of S' b satisfactory evidence) to be the persono whose name deyefie subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged filly to me that heisheHhey-executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature��S�O� SF1234 (SEV.A•7192) (CA) (INDNIDUAL) OFFICIAL SEAL 1EANNE E. KRUGER-VELD NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN LOS ANOELES COUNTY My Commission Expires 1pne 6, 1995, (This area for official notarial seal) RESOLUTION NO. 90-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH APPROVING SITE PLAN REVIEW NO, 60 FOR A DENSITY BONUS REQUEST OF MESA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING A FOURTEEN UNIT APARTMENT AT 1530 PLACENTIA AVENUE AFFORDABLE TO LOW INCOME FAMILIES FOR A PERIOD OF THIRTY YEARS AND ACCEPTING THE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT. WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach has adopted a Housing Element as part of its General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Housing Element of the Newport Beach General Plan hasA established policies pertaining to the providing of housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community; and WHEREAS, these policies include providing incentives within the limitation of available resources; and WHEREAS, the development of rental housing affordable to low income persons and families is a goal established in the Housing Element of the Newport Beach General Plan; and WHEREAS, Section 65915 of the California Government Code provides for approval of a density bonus and other incentives for affordable housing developments; and WHEREAS, the Mesa Development Company development provides all 14 units as affordable units to low income persons and families for a period of thirty years; and WHEREAS, the proposed 14 units affordable to low income persons and families will assist the City in achieving its goal of providing housing for all income segments of the community; and WHEREAS, the number of units provided and the 30 year term of affordability justify the granting of a 57% density bonus and other incentives; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach has recommended that the City Council approve the density bonus and other incentives and certify the Environmental Document. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach that the environmental document is accepted with the following Findings: 1. That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and Council Policy K-3. 2. That the contents of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project. 3. That based on the information contained in the Initial Study, comments received, and all related documents, there is no substantial evidence that the project (as conditioned or as modified by mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study) could have a significant effect on the environment. -1- NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach that a density bonus and other incentives are hereby granted to the Mesa Development Company to build a 14 unit apartment at 1530 Placentia Avenue subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot j plan, floor plans, and elevations except as noted below. 2. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 3. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. 4. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 5. That the on -site vehicular and pedestrian circulation system be subject to further review by the Public Works Department and the City Traffic Engineer. 6. That prior to the issuance of Building Permits the applicants shall record a reciprocal easement for ingress, egress and parking purposes, the form and content of which is to be approved by the City Attorney and Planning Director, over the southerly 26.5 feet of the adjoining property at 1538 Placentia Avenue and the northerly 8 feet of the subject property. The final design and location of the easement shall be'subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. 7. That arrangements be made with the Public Works Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements, 8. That the unused drive apron be removed and replaced with curb, gutter and a full width sidewalk which shall be constructed along the Placentia Avenue frontage under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department, 9. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Public Works Department, along with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain facilities for *the on -site improvements prior to the issuance of grading permits or building permits. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. 10. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. 11. That disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. 12. That overhead utilities serving the site shall be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code. 13. No construction, storage or delivery of materials shall be stored within the Placentia Avenue right-of-way and that an 8 foot wide pedestrian walkway be provided at all times except when the new sidewalk is actually being placed. -2- U-1 14. That water services be provided per Costa Mesa Consolidated Water District Standards. �3q(, 15 That any proposed landscaping or signs adjacent to the public right-of-way tt shall be approved by the Public Works Department, 16. That the occupancy of the four SRO style studio units shall be limited to one person each. 17. That the waiver of the Fair Share fee shall be subject to the City Council approval. 18. That development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit to be approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 19. That a grading plan shall include a complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities, to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants. 20. The siltation control plan shall include a description of haul. routes, access points to the site, watering, and sweeping program designed to minimize impact of haul operations. 21. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the prepared plan). 22. The landscape plan shall place heavy emphasis on the use of drought -resistant native vegetation and be irrigated with a system designed to avoid surface runoff and over -watering. 23. That the lighting system shall be designed and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed electrical engineer; with a letter stating that this requirement has been met. 24. That the applicant shall enter into a Grant Deed and an Affordable Housing 1 Agreement, approved as to' form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, guaranteeing that ten (10) 2-bedroom units within the project shall be made available on a preferential basis to persons and families possessing an "active" Section 8 Existing Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section 8 Fair Market Rent (FMR) Schedule for Newport Beach, That the 4 SRO units shall be rented by individuals that makes no more than 30% of the Orange County median income as established on the State's Section 6932 income limits table and rented for no more than 30% of that income. That the SRO rents may be adjusted upward relative to increases in the median income on the State's Section 6932 income table. Section 8 Certificate and Voucher holders may rent the 4 SRO units but not on a preferential basis. When a Section 8 tenant does not occupy a 2-bedroom unit, the unit shall be rented to persons and families earning a maximum income of no more than 80 percent of the median income for Newport Beach adjusted for family size as shown on the Section 6932 Income Limits Table at or below the HUD Fair Market rent. Said Grand Deed and Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building -3- I permits. The term of this agreement'shall be for no more than thirty (30) years. 25. That the project shall be redesigned so as to provide a minimum 5.192 foot side yard setback. 26. That to the extent permitted by State and Federal law, preference shall be given to City of Newport Beach employees, with respect to the lease of rental units. 27. If any underground fuel tanks are found to be located on the subject property, the tanks shall be removed in accordance with the requirements of the Newport Beach Fire Department and the Orange County Health Care Agency Environmental Health Division. 28. That prior to the issuance of demolition permits for onsite structures, all asbestos and other regulated hazardous or toxic material shall be removed from the site in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Environmental Protection Agency and any other state or local requirements. ADOPTED this26th day of _November , 1990. ATTEST: JM\RES\CDBGMESA.CC2 Mayor -4- w CITY OF NEWPORT REACH 1% 1 M K%A1 I 'resent .bsent .o tion .yes .bstained .bsent lotion .11 Ayes MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING PLACE: Council Chambers TIME: 7-100 P.M. DATE: November 26, 1990 IA. ROLL CALL. B. Reading of Minutes of Meeting of November 13, 1990, was waived, approved as written, and ordered filed. C. Reading of all ordinances and resolutions under consideration was waived, and City Clerk was directed to read by titles only. D. HEARINGS: 1. Mayor Sansone opened the public hearing regarding COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS, a request by LAWRENCE M. CAMPEAU AND JAMES G. WHITE, ,TR., to consider the granting of $50,000 in CDBG funds, $2,500 of 1989-90 unused Social Service Funding; $38,901 of 1989- 90 funds previously allocated to New Housing Construction; $1,000 of 1990-91 funds previously allocated to New Housing Construction; and $7,599 of 1990-91 funds previously allocated to Administration; to assist with the development of a 14 unit apartment for low income persons and families and a finding of no significant effect on the environment; AND SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 60, a request to approve a site plan review for the purpose of permitting a residential density bonus of 6 units within an affordable housing development containing a total of 14 units on property located in the MFR (2178) District. In accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code, the applicant is also requesting an adjustment to the off-street parking requirement and the minimum dwelling unit size as incentives for the development of affordable housing. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow the construction of open carports on the front one-half of the lot, where the Zoning Code restricts open carports to the rear one-half of the site; and the acceptance of an environmental document. Property located at 1530 PLACENTIA AVENUE, on the easterly side of Placentia Avenue, between 15th Street and Production Place, in Northwest Newport. Council Member Cox entered the meeting at this time, and took his seat at the Council table. Volume 44 - Page 395 14011V COUNCIL MEMBERS �. CITX OF NEWPORT BEACIP November 26, 1990 Report from the Planning Department. The City Manager, upon direction by the City Council, summarized the project stating that it has been endorsed by the Planning commission and is a straight- forward, low/moderate income housing development, but it is a little different, inasmuch as four low-cost housing units are being transferred from the 28th Street -Marina Project approved', by the Council earlier this year. He further advised that: Basically it is eight units with six bonus units; four of these units would be "single room occupancy (SRO) style units," which is the first such project before the City Council, and as a result, the applicants have, requested a waiver of the onsite parking from 35 to 29. Also, tonight's proposed application concerns the fact that the SRC units are only 434 sq. ft.; whereas the Zoning code requires a minimum 600 sq. ft., and the application becomes' a little bit more complicated when you add the transfer of four low- cost housing units for the 28th Street Marina Project required as a condition of approval for that project. Initial- ly, it was intended to provide these four low-cost housing units on a Newport Boulevard Traffic Island, in the Cannery Village/ McFadden Square area, but the noise, and economic studies indicated that this would not be feasible, and through negotiations with developers of tonight's proposed project, Lawrence M. Campeau and James G. White, Jr., they will pay $120,000 to transfer these four units. CDBG/ Site Plan Review 60 A condition of the 28th Street Marina Project construction of residential development on the Island was that the applicant pay $27,000 in park in -lieu fees because a subdivision was required. As discussed in the Planning Commission staff report, it was anticipated that the developers of tonight's proposed project would apply for $30,000 of the 1991-92 CDBD Funds to accumulate the $200,000 of requested assistance. Since the four off -site affordable units for the 28th Street Marina project are to be located in this development, the Planning Commission, at its meeting of November 8, 1990, amended the requirement for the payment of park dedication fees at the off -site location. The amendment changed the condition to say as long as residential Volume 44 - Page 396 'ITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES �ipCCOUNCIL MEMBERS \o-'�\\V �A\ November 26, 1990 units are not constructed, park dedication fees need not be paid. The applicant for the 28th Street Marina development has agreed to pay the "saved" park fees to Mesa Development, thereby eliminating the need for the 1991-92 CDBG application for $30,000, which also eliminates the current $30,000 shortfall of CDBG Funds. Through the CDGB Funds that are unused at the present time, and cannot be used by organizations that do not qualify for the use of these funds, the City can write -down the cost of the land to make the project feasible for low-cost housing for 30 years. The SRO units will rent for $350 per month, and is consistent and supportive of the City's Housing Element of"the General Plan. Craig Bluell, Principal Planner, addressed the Council in response to questions raised concerning the $27,000 in -lieu fees, stating that the requirement to pay the park fees goes with the Traffic Island site and the resubdivision that was filed with that site. He added that there was no requirement for park fees because there was no subdividion/resubdivision required for the Placentia property, and the total "package price" the 28th Street Marina developer was willing to pay was $150,000; $120,000 being the transfer payment and the other funds would possibly be in -lieu park fees that might be associated with the Placentia site. When those fees were not required because the units were transferred, and there was no need for a subdivision on Placentia, the 28th Street Marina developer also agreed to pay the "saved" park fees to the developers of tonight's proposed project. Upon inquiry from the City Council, it was determined that Condition 6 of the proposed resolution (Attachment 2 of the staff report) approving Site Plan Review No. 60, be amended to read that the reciprocal easement for ingress, egress and parking purposes be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and Planning Director before recordation. In response to Council inquiry, Craig Bluell advised that the 4-single room occupancy style units will be monitored under the CDBG Program, and the regular apartments will also be monitored under the CDBG Funds. He added that the City Volume 44 - Page 397 CDBG/ Site Plan Review 60 .1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEAC' COUNCIL MEMBERS CALL\ November 26, 1990 is looking forward to building similar CDBG/ an Site Plan units. Under the strictest definition of Review 60 SRO, the unit must be below 220 sq. ft.. In the proposed development the units technically are not SRO units, as they will be 450 gross sq. ft., renting for a similar price which is being paid for a unit approximately 120-150 sq. ft. The proposed project is satisfying the requirement of. the Housing Element, and under State law we are providing low-income housing, and there is no reason that the units be small. In response to Council inquiry, the City Attorney advised that there are Federal statutes that prevent imposing conditions such as a residential preference, or an employment preference oniprojects that are funded or regulated by CDBG Funds, but that this has not been challenged in the courts. At the suggestion of Council Member Hart, the following language is to be added to the list of Conditions in the subject resolution for adoption, to the extent permitted by State and Federal law, preference 'shall be given to the City of Newport Beach employees with respect to the lease or rental of the units." The Planning Director advised that there are two additional conditions being proposed for this project regulating the small 500-gallon underground storage tank on the site, and the elimination of any asbestos or hazardous materials. The applicants have read the conditions and are in agreement. Lawrence M. Campeau, Mesa Development, addressed the Council upon invitation by Mayor Sansone, commented that they had originally requested $80,000 in funds from the City. With regard to the in -lieu park fees, and when it became known to Mr. Newcomb that he would not have to pay those park fees, he offered to give the park fees to Mesa Development, so Mesa Development reduced their request by $30,000, and in effect, the City is really getting the park fees. With regard to management, State law requires that there is an on -site manager when you have 14 or more units, and the units will be managed by a person who is employed by one of the Orange County housing agencies, who also happens to live in the apartments next door to the proposed units. Volume 44 - Page 398 ' "'ITY OF NEWPORT REACH COUNCIL MEMBERS MINUTES ROLL CflLL November 26, 1990 TNi1FX Motion All Ayes x After it was determined that no else the Moti (a) (b) Volume wished to address this issue, public hearing was closed. on was made to: Adopt Resolution No. 90-120, approving a grant of $50,000 of CDBG funds, $41,401 from fiscal year 1989-90 funds and $8,599 from fiscal year 1990- 91 funds, to assist with the development of a 14 unit apartment at 1530 Placentia Avenue, for low income persons and families and accepting a Finding of No Significant Impact; AND Adopt_ Resolution No 90-121. approving Site Plan Review No. 60 granting a density bonus and other incentives in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code, and accepting the Environmental Document; and that Condition No. 6, page 2 of the subject resolution be amended to include that the reciprocal easement for ingress, egress and parking purposes, include language "that the form of which is to be approved by the city Attorney and Planning Director;" and that two Conditions be added concerning: (1) that the City, monitor the removal of th underground storage tank, and (2) the elimination of any asbestos or hazardous materials; and an additional Condition that "To the extent permitted by State and Federal law, Preference shall be given to City of Newport Beach employees, with respect to the lease of the rental units." 44 - Page 399 Res 90-120 Res 90-1211 -, CITY OF NWORT BEACI COUNCIL MEMBERS November 26, 1990 MINUTES I INDEX ROLL CALL E PUBLIC COMMENTS: ouncil Member Sansone addressed the Council d those in the audience, stating that as the n w Mayor, he would offer a "State of the City Me sage --that the City is on a 'pay-as-you-go bas's,' i.e., if you don't have the money, you don spend it. He added that the City main ins reserves, and although they look good, this may not be the case., The City sets aside eserves from the General Revenues to pay fo projects which will take place down the roa : o The Oasis Modernization, which requires appr ximately $700,000, will have taken thre years to accumulate those funds; o The ew City Library will take approxi ately $7 Million; o . The City has, for several years, been looking f r an alternative to depending upon the M tropolitan Water District for water, and is investigating drilling wells in an djoining city and funding a transmission system to get the water to the west part of the City into the main district--esti ated to be $5 - $7 Million. The 'ty has been faced with the quality of he water obtained from the San Joaquin ills Reservoir and has had to increase a amount of chlorine into the City's re ervoir at Big Canyon. The Metropolitan Wa er District is going to take control ove that reservoir and is going to do one o two things, either to cover it or b ild an adjacent filtering plant, and hat is something they are processing an EIR on. If there is an open reservoir and additional filtering or coverin of another reservoir, the city wi have to do something to our Big Ca on Reservoir _ and we are gathering rese vso for this also; o There is a problem which we h ve alluded to in the last two to three m nths, and that is that there has been a start of shift of financial responsibil'ty from the County to the City. We re now being told by the County that t e City will be charged fees, which a not budgeted items, and these fees cou run into a considerable amount of m ey, i.e., Jail Booking Fees when delive ing prisoners to the County ($75 rising to $175); also, the City is being char d for the collection of taxes --our Ci gets 20% of the taxes, and the County volume 44 - Page 400 w• r February 11, 1991 Conditions of Approval Site Plan Review No. 60 1530 Placentia Plan Check #43-91 Condition Department Action Substantial Planning Plans approval i Landscaping Planning Letter of Compliance i Trash enclosures Planning Plans approval Field Check Hold on Final B r E 4. Improvements Public Works Plans approval 5. Circulation Public Works Plans approval ' Traffic Engineer Reciprocal Easement City Attorney Prior to Issuance�9� Planning Director of bldg. permits Traffic Engineer rJ 7. Public Improvements Public Works Plans approval ff 8. Encroachment Permit Public Works Plans approval 9. Improvements Public Works Plans approval 10. Sanitation fees Public Works Plans approval 11. Construction work Building Plans approval 12. Utilities Public Works Plans approval 13. Construction materials Building Plans approval 14. Water Service Public Works Plans approval *&ndscaping/signs Public Works Separate review & permits Conditions of Approval Site Plan Review No. 60 Page 2 GVHRO units tl 1.?. Fair Share Fees Waiver 18. Grading Permit Planning Letter of Compliance City Council Public Hearing Building Plans approval Planning (n08. Grading Permit vv Planning Plans approval 20. Siltation control plan Building Plans approval dscape plan Planning Plans approval Finat PBR Public Works Hold on TEcT� Landscape Plan PBR Hold on Final ghting VR� Planning F4 Licensed Elect. Eng. Hold on final 044. Afford Housing Agreement Planning Recorded prior to y M 1,11 issuance of bldg. permit -fit �,5. 5.192 ft. side yard setbacks Planning Plans approval � �ase of units 27. Underground tanks 28. Hazardous materials = Letter of Compliance Fire Dept. Building -Dept._ Prior to demolition ,' u - ermits p0i, aO vge, ctf 0 P05 50 1� ^ m A B A T E C, I N C. AHERA Accredited Inspectors, Management Planners and Project Designers Licensed Asbestos Consultants Cal -OSHA #C-73 Licensed Asbestos Removal Contractors Cal -OSHA #40 25422 Trabuco Roadv Suite 105--332 El Toro, Calif" 92630 714 --.80~8995 Lic" 0529488 October 9, 1990 Mr" Larry Campeau Mesa Development Co. 2925 College #A~3 Costa Mesa, Ca. 92626 Re: Specific Sampling Site located at 1530 Placentia, Costa Mesa, Calif" Dear Mr" Campeau, This report is to present the findings of specific sampling at the above subject site conducted by Abatec, Inc" on Oct. 87 1990" The objective of this evaluation was -to sample and visually inspect for asbestos containing materials at the site. Two separate structures are located at this address: a welding shop and a cabinet shop. RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION AND INSPECTION OCTOBER 8, 1990 The results are as follows: Asbestos containing materials are noted with an asterisk (*), RESULTS OF SAMPLING SAMPLE NUMBER TYPE OF MATERIAL AREA RESULT OF ANALYSIS 1530P_1 Floor Vinyl Crm West Office No Asbestos Detected 1530P~2 Wallboard 1530P~3 Ceiling Panel *VISUAL Transite Stack *1530P-4 Floor Tile Black w/Cream *1530P^~5 Floor Tile Yellow w/maroon 1530P~^6 Floor Vinyl Tan i530P~^7 Ceiling Panel , West Office No Asbestos Detected West Office No Asbestos Detected Shop Area 40% Asbestos Common by Bead Blaster Main Office 15% Asbestos Detected Main Office 15% Asbestos Detected Main Office NO Asbestos Detected Restroom Main Office No Asbestos Detected & Hallway N ./`~\ /~^\ � A 8 A T E C, ~2~ Sampling - 1530 Placentia' Costa Mesa 1530P-8 Rolled Roofing *1530P-9 Roofing Tar I N C. Welding Shop No Asbestos Detected Welding Shop 40% Asbestos Detected 1530P-10 Rolled Roofing Cabinet Shop No Asbestos Detected FINDINGS SUMMARY The floor tile in the main office, hallway and restroom (lower layer) areas contain asbestos. The vent flue stack above where a heater was located in the past is positive for asbestos" The roofing sealing tar around the electrical service on the West side of the main building and at the corners of the main building roof is also positive for asbestos. These materials should be removed by a licensed removal contractor, using proper equipment and procedures. No other building materials were noted which might have contained asbestos. To the best of our knowledge, all suspect materials were either sampled or visually identified for asbestos content" Please be aware that Abatec, Inc" is also a licensed asbestos removal contractor. This statement is necessary to advise you of possible conflict of interest between Abatec's dual roles of building inspector and removal contractor. The laboratory chosen to analyze the above physical samples is completely independent of Abatec, Inc" and is fully accredited to perform asbestos bulk sample analysis. Should you have any questions, please office" Abatec, Inc" OLA Registration 89-0001699 feel free to contact our PRECISION MICRO -ANALYSIS c• SPEC.:IALIST,S IN ASLILSTO�-RTII.<TI:1) ANALYSIS Bulk Sample Analysis (PLNt) Report fi r: Kell Snntland Abatec, Inc. 25422 Trabuco Rd., ,Stu. 10 El Toro, CA 92630 Phone: (714)380-8995 C CQ) .Iy( Report # 90283001 Date Collected:10/08/90 Date Received:10/09/90 Date Analyzed:l0/101y0 Job: Mesa Development 1530 Placentia Costa Mesa Sample Number Sample Locadon Sam to Deseri tion Anal ticut Results 1530P-1 West Office Cream color floor tito with No asbestos detected fibrous backing; 141b #90-403.50 1530P-2 Wesl Office �r White wallboard No asbestos detected Nib #90.403.51 153UP-3 Brest Off tee Off-white ceiling panel, 2 x 4' No asbestos detected i 35.40efa Cellulose filers 30.35r% Fibrous glass Lab 1190.40352 15.20%n Perlite 153UP-4 Main Offjue Black floor We and mastic 10-15% Chrysodle asbestos (Insufl icicnt mastic for analysis) 14 # 90-403.53 1530P-5 I Ialn Offioc Yellow floor tide and gtastic 10-15% Chrysotile asbestos (Insutficient mastic for analysis) Lab rf 90.40354 153017.6 _ Reshoom Tan vinyl floor ilia ; No asbestos detected Lah N90.40355 Total Number of Sumples: 10 Supervisor Analyst Page I Note:'llie test result findings of this report arc made to the ntetbodulogics and partuueters dowrihcd on the reverse hide of this pAge 5685-A Power 1nu Road a Sacramento, CA 95824 - (916) 381.0095 • FAX (916) 381.3805 PRECISION N MICRO -ANALYSIS (.: SWC.7AT.1S 1'S IN ASHr,,; 'c)f-W,',LKrhr) ANALY, Bulk Sample Analysis (PLEA) Report for: Report # 90283001 I ' Ken Stnutand Date Collected:10/oWO Date Received:10/09/90 Abatec, Inc. 25422 Trabueo Rd., Ste. 10 R11 tyro, CA 92630 Phone: (714)380-8995 cc, Date Analyzed: I oil 0/90 Job: Mesa Nvelopnient 1530 placcntia Costa Mesa SamplcNuml>cr 1530P-7 -- SanlpleLocation Main Office Satnf>leDescripticn _ While ceiling panel AnalyticalResults No asbestos detected 85-900/n Cellulose fibers Lob #90-40356 1530F•g Main Bldg. Black rolled ivttCing i No asbestos detected Lab # 90-40357 1530P-9 Main Bldg. Grey/Black roofing utr 35-40% Chrysotile asbestos Lath #90.40358 1530P•10 middle Bldg. Black/Grcy rolled roofing No asbestos detected Lab #90.403.59 7'ntal Number of Samples: 10 Supervisor Note: The test tesutt findings of this retort arc mude to tho t crttc_A Pti,vor inn Road v Sacramento, Page z Analyst „ and puamcters desc,IW' I an the roverse side of this pa • (916) 381-0695 9 FAX (916) 381.3805 D G R GeoAemediation Inc. I ENYIRONMENTAG CONSULTING , MITIGATION October 25, 1990 Newport Harbor Apartments c/o Mesa Development 2925 College Avenue, Suite'A-3 Costa Mesa, California 92626 Attn: Larry Campeau C-1 17141 Murphy Avenue, Irvine, CA 92714 (714) 476.1814 Subject: Results of the investigation of the subsurface soil conditions near a relatively small underground storage tank located at 1530 Placentia Avenue in Newport Beach, California. Gentlemen; 1.0 INTRODUCTION GeoRemediation, Inc. (GRI) has recently completed a limited subsurface investigation of the condition of the soil near and beneath a relatively small underground storage tank located at 1530 Placentia Avenue in Newport Beach, California. Three hand auger borings were excavated, physical observations were recorded, samples were collected and delivered to Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. (Truesdail) in Tustin, California and the samples were analyzed to verify the field observations. The following sections detail these activities. 2.0 INVESTIGATION On October 12, 1990 a GRI staff geologist and technician conducted an investigation of the soil near the location of the relavitiely small (500 gallon or less) underground storage tank located on the subject site. D 9 The investigation October 25, 1990 Page 2 consisted of the excavation of three hand auger boring angled so that soil from beneath the tank, the most likely location of contamination if a leak had occurred, could be observed and sampled. The site is currently occupied by Other Guys Welding Service (OGWS). Employees of OGWS informed the GRI crew that, to their knowledge, the tank had not been used in the last thirty years. GRI personnel made a cursory inspection of the contents of the tank through the fill port. "Sticking" the tank revealed approximately one cfuarter of an inch of dark colored "sludge" apparently the residue of the last use of the tank. A slight odor characterizic of petroleum hydrocarbons was observed. The soil excavated during hand auger boring activities was found to be a moist brown silty clay. No indications of the presents of hydrocarbon contamination was observed. A Gastech Organic Vapor Meter (OVM) was used to screen the borings for the presents of combustible vapors. OVM readings of 150 to 160 parts per million were observed during the borings. These reading are not unusual as naturally occurring background in the vicinity of the subject site. All three borings were excavated eleven feet on an angle which is equivalent to approximately 9 feet below ground surface. Soil samples from the bottom of each boring were October 25, 1990 Page 3 collected,, chilled and transported to Truesdail for analysis by EPA Method 8015 Modified for the detection of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH). 3.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS The TPH concentration in each of the three samples tested was found to be less than 10 mg/kg, the detection limit of the method. Copies of the official laboratory results are attached to this report. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the information presented above the following conclusions and recommendations are made: * Physical observation of the contents of the tank reveals only a minor volume of petroleum hydrocarbon material remains in the tank; * No indication of contaminated soil was observed during the excavation of the three hand auger borings; * Chemical analysis of the soil samples collected confirmed the field observations of the absense of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination; * It is possible, but unlikely, that leakage or spillage may have effected areas not included as part of this investigation. If such areas are located they will 'likely consist of a very small volume of soil. In checking our records it has come to GRI's attention that as of March 31, 1989 the subject tank was not listed on the r "Orange County Underground Tank Facilities within the Jurisdiction of Orange County Health" list. The October 25, 1990 Page 4 ramification of this is that prior to any activities to remove the undergound storage tank, it would have to be registered. Following registration, removal activities can proceed according to current regulations. 5.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION This investigation was conducted using a degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable Soil Engineers, Geologists, and Environmental Scientists practicing in this of similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you have any questions, please call. Very Truly Yours GeoRemediation Inc. Gary T. Carlin Edward T. Cieslak Senior Environmental Geologist Project Environmental Chemist REPORT 'TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. CHEMISTS - MICROBIOLOGISTS - ENGINEERS RESEARCH - DEVELOPMENT - TESTING Georemediation, Inc. CLIENT 17141 Murphy Avenue, Suite D Irvine, California 92714 Attention: Andy Zikeli SAMPLE Three Soils INVESTIGATION 14201 FRANKLIN AVENUE TUSTIN. CALIF. 9 2 B 80 AREA CODE 714 • 730-6239 AREA CODE 213 • 225-1564 F A X 714 • 730-6462 October 19, 1990 DATE RECEIVED October 12, 1990 LABORATORY NO. 45294 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPA 8015M) Sample I.D. 1. B-1 2. B-2 3• B-3 RESULTS Detection mg/kg 10.0 10.0 10.0 Concentration mg/kg ND ND ND Respectfully submitted, TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. �{i"'q Divine. B. Pascual, Assist. Mgr. Water and Waste Laboratory This report applies only ""he sample, or samples, investigated and is not necessarily indicative of the quality or condition of apparently identical or similar products. Asa mutual protection to clients, the public and these Laboratories, this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed and upon the condition that it is not to be used, in whole or in part, in any advertising or publicity matter without prior written authorization from these Laboratories. To: Building Department, J-ow No Activity: In Plan Checkt�� From: Planning Department Active Bldg Permit: Public Works Notified: Re: Hold on Building Permit Final Plan Checker Notified: Address 1531) �l%(�2�tJ>// Plan Check No. Planning Department Comments PRIOR TO RELEASE Of Building Permit Final: [ ] Park Dedication Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE. [ ] Fairshare Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE. , [ ] S.J.H.T.C. Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE. [ ] Coastal Commission Approval of Resubdivision Must Be Obtained. [ ] Parcel Map Recordation: Resubdivision No. Record date [ ] Use Permit Conditions of Approval: Use Permit No. Condition(s) No. [ ] After recordation of the map a building permit change must be processed with the Building and Planning. Departments,-_PRTOR TO FINAL OF THE BUILDING PERPiIII to change the description of,-Ibe permit to reflect condominium construction, the fee is nominal and payable at the time of the change. Proof of payment of the above mentioned fees may be required at that time if not collected at issuance of the original building or grading permits. N Other: Units Demolished Units Built BY; s�.� %iA'� dateW� Planning,, Department CC: code Enforcement Plan Checker F:\WP50\JAY\MEM\BP-HOLD.MEM rev 4-5-90 DECLARATION OF COMPL;ANCE VITA CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART 61 OF TITLE 40 AN6 AOO RULE 1403. 0 1 SUCI41TTED ASBESTOS NOTIFICATION T0: 0 EPA 6 AGMD 13 ASBESTOS IPPLICABLEOTOFIS NOT PROPOSED I DEMOLITION. SIGNATURE'---._._.--------- A-141"17, 60,�Y & of 40 RESIDENTIAL ZONING CORRECTIONS / Telephone: (7141 Pln Check No: 644-3200 a By• enia Garcia Assistant Planner By:Marc Myers Ass*stant Planner 4',-`5_--7 / Address: By:Christy Teague Assistant Planner Date. Districting Map NO: Land Use Element Page No Corrections Required: Legal Description: Lot lock Verify legal description with Public Works J Section Tract Covenant required. Please have owner's signature document and return �toome. S x �� Lot Size — / 2 _/ Zone No. of Units Allowed e=: / Proposed Buildable Area � \Maximum Structu2'al Area stairway(s) on one level and ire Proposed Structural Area: d0 r Provide tissue overlay of calculatior. open Space Area (L/� cu.ft. x height limit x sic). This a must 6'x 6'), and open on at least otherwise specified in Zoning Code. +6 7�i ry iOaos 669 notarized on the at;ty ched kan ding exterior walls, _ x buildable area. --v ble area. square roorage. 5G 3.A �=to-buildable width in any direction (6'x and one end, unl5esGE 4� Re uired etb�a-c�k9s , J AD Front r�'�/��in(/�J ^ /�//�CP.�✓c� / ,� (3 Sell Eo c Rear, Height Limitation (Volume of space eqi be at least six feet sides, or one side may not be permitted to encroach into required setback: /Garden Measured from natural grade to mid -point of roof. Code allows an additional 5'0" to the peak of the ridge height. Allowable mid -point C�5 Allowable ridge height_ ,�Q ime n-a-1-1--elevations from natura mid -points) of roof plane(s) _eg� ridge(s) of roof plane'(s) Label natural grade and finished grade on all elevations. Distance between buildings Maximum Coverage Number of Stories C� Required Parking: clear inside minimum dimens' - 9'-4" x 19' single space 17'-6" x 19' two spaces la ICJV�rfa S�A�s )-/7CO AT/ ,,,.� Z-o 7_ 8' x 16' third/fourth space(s) �v %�G ZCgc fFO Oet% RESIDENTIAL ZONING CORRECTIONS Telephone: (7141 644-3200 By• eniF a Garcia Assistant Planner By:Marc Myers Assistant Planner Date: �is/ A Plan Check No:-, :: By:Christy Teaquej Assistant P3-^--n Districting Map No. Land Use Element Page No. corrections Required: Legal Description: Lo t1lock verify legal description with Public Works Section Tract Covenant required. Please have owner's signature document and return to me. //'' // 6 ,�0) Lot Size / 63 rh I , %ASS x Zone — No. of Units Allowed /= (ZurI-_-� / Proposed 7 �k Buildable Area �\r N Maximum Structu a Area stairway(s) on one level and r ire Proposed Structural Area: lU Provide tissue overlay of calculation open Space Area670 Y-122L & cu.ft. x height limit x sit). This aTeamust 61x 6'), and open on at least otherwise specified in Zoning Code. M,W,el 4- f3O,J 0s / 01669 notarized on /0 IY.U/%`S 4f (5P-D fume of space e—v at least six feet es. or one side Re uired etbacks / � Front r) 51Cy- the att ched 9// F.e r� B95 ding exterior walls, _ x buildable area. - x buid dable area. square aca e. Tto-buildable width in anv direction (6'x and one end�GNlesh SGr' e b �. ©P t� Y"eO-A,-, may not be permitted to encroach into required setback: /Garden Height Limitation Measured from natural grade to mid -point of roof. Code allows an additional 510" to the peak of the ridge height. / Allowable mid -point 075 Allowable ridge height 'ID / v Remarks: 4GC%/Le l a qn Label natural grade and finished grade on all elevations. Distance between buildings Maximum coverage �j Number of Stories C Required Parking: clear inside minimum dimension 9'-4" x 19' single apace ~' 17'-6" x 19' two spaces 4<1 8' x 16' third/fourth space(s) L ZIi,/ d: � O /tJ r r Label clear inside D...dimensions•- @/Y�d�of provided parking spaces 5T �/� , Is demolition proposed? Ues � 0 kkV �fi/'T/ON /4:trovJ -r SHdio Number of units to be demo Iished•k0� Ta7'Q(1 SQ FMZ% '�))�t Fairshare Contribution f4San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee Park Dedication Fee SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH: Please indicate any discretionary approval numbers on the plans and incorporate the attached; excerpt of minutes and list of findings and conditions into the blueline drawings Modifications Committee: Modification required fo approval letter into the blueline drawings Indicate Approval No. on Plans Planning Commission/City Council: Use Permit: No. Variance: No. Resubdivision/Tract: No — Site Plan Review: - No, pa)'%cz� */IG d Amendment: No. Other Public Works: Ease /. ,�hment Permit ubdivision Engineer Traffic Engineer Approval of Landscape Plans Building Department: Grading Engineer Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans Coastal Approval Required: , Exempt, Because Categorical Exclusion No. (C.E.O.) Effective Date (Note: Building permits may be issued 10 days following issuance of C.E.O.) Approval In Concept (AIC) No. (Note: File 3 sets of plans: site, floor, and elevations) Waiver # Effective Date Coastal Development Permit No. Effective Date Miscellaneous 1. Provide floor plan(s), fully dimensioned, showing all room uses. 2. Provide plot plan, fully dimensioned, showing: _ location of all buildings, and distance to property lines. .�c"iTIJ distance from face of curb to front property line (verify with Public Works) second and third floor footprints (if applicable) all projections (i.e. fireplaces, bay windows), label distance(s) to PL(s) 3. Chimney (and chimney caps etc.) heights permitted only as required by U.B.C. or manufacturer specifications. 4. °Pools, spas, walls, fences, patio covers and other free tanding str`q/cures require separate reviews and permite!� 77LtLf�Q 7/GCrC/ 077' /Ry 5. Association Approval( pproval ( dvisor Issuance of a Building Permit by the City does not relieve applican of legal requirement to observe covenants, condi- tions and restrictions which may be recorded against the property or to obtain community association approval of plans. NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200. FORMS\RES-ZON.COR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COUNCIL MEMBERS Z�G 110 �Of November 13, 1990 MINUTES INDEX ( Memorandum from Board of Library Library Trustees requesting the City Council (50) a ept $1000 GIFT FROM FRIENDS OF THE NEW T BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY IN SUPPOR F SPECIAL ADULT PROGRAMMING SERIES R FY 1990/91p and appropriate a funds to account 117010000. For information and filings (c) Report from the Planning D artment� Planning regarding status of BASKETBALL OURT (68) at 424 Old Newport Bouleva (Report from the Planning Department) Wt 10. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULING: November 26, 1990 - (a) Public hearing regarding COMMUNITY CDBG Fund DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS, Site Plan a request by LAWRENCE M. CAMPEAU AND Revw 60 JAMES G. WHITE, JR. to consider the (87) granting of $50,000 in CDBG funds, $2,500 of 1989-90 unused Social Service Funding; $38,901 of 1989-90 funds previously allocated to New Housing Construction; $1,400 of 1990- 91 funds previously allocated to New Housing Construction; and $7,599 of 1990-91 funds previously allocated to Administration; to assist with the development of a 14 unit apartment for low income persons and families and a finding of no significant effect on the environment; AND Public hearing regarding SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 60, a request to approve a site plan review for the purpose of permitting a residential density bonus of 6 units within an affordable housing development containing a total of 14 units on property located in the MFR (2178) District. In accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code, the applicant is also requesting an adjustment to the off-street parking requirement and the Volume 44 - Page 382 P Nl� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COUNCIL MEMBERS G q 9 s \top\ tNovember 13, 1990 ROI_t_ CALL MINUTES INDEX minimum dwelling unit size as incentives for the development of affordable housing. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow the construction of open carports on the front one-half of the lot, where the Zoning Code restricts open carports to the rear one-half of the site; and the acceptance of an environmental document. Property located at 1530 PLACENTIA AVENUE, on the easterly side of Placentia Avenue, between 15th Street and Production Place, in Northwest Newport, (Report from the Planning Department) December 10, 1990 - (b) IMPROVEMENT OF OCEAN FRONT STREET Ocean Frnt ENDS OF ORANGE STREET AND PROSPECT St Ends/ STREET - Schedule a publ' Orange & hearing for 7:00 p.m. on Decem er Prospect 10, 1990, on the "NOTICE OF C ST" C-2730 for the improvement of the cean (38) front street ends of Ora a and Prospect Streets. (Rep t from the Public Works Depart ent) 11. FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 4055 - A ract request of REGI3 CONTRAC ORS, INC. to 14055 subdivide two ing parcels rxie containing 8.953- acre of land, into a single lot for a 90 unit residential condominium develo ment. Property located at 1100 E T COAST HIGHWAY, on the northeasterl corner of East Coast Highway and J ree Road, in the Villa t Apartm is Planned Community. ort from he Planning Department) PTANCE OF CONSTRUCTION . OF THE TxfC Sgnl FIC GNAL INTERCONNECT ON JAMBOREE Intercnt/ F M BAYVIEW WAY TO BIRCH STREET Jamboree/ T CT NO. 2817) - Accept the work; Bayview Wy thorize the City Clerk to file a - Birch ce of Completion, and release the /TRACT C-2817 s 35 days after the Notice of (38) letion has been recorded in dance with applicable portions of Civil Code. (Report from Public Department) NO. 12105 - Approve an extension Tract agreement guaranteeing the completion of 12105 improvements along the MacArthur Boulevard frontage adjacent to the Volume 44 - Page 383 ra 0 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of Newport Beach that a density bonus -and other incentives are hereby granted to the Mesa Development Company to build a 14 unit apartment at 1530 Placentia Avenue'. subject to the following conditions: `l) That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans, and elevations except as noted below. %That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All tv vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition, That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. 4. That all improvements be constructed as !required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 5. That the on -site vehicular and pedestrian. circulation system be subject to further review by the Public Works Department and the City Traffic Engineer. 6. That prior to the issuance of Building Permits the applicants shall record a reciprocal easement for ingress, egress and parking purposes, the form and: content of which is to be approved by the' City Attorney and Planning Director, over the southerly 26.5 feet of the adjoining property at 1538 Placentia Avenue and the northerly 8 feet of the subject property. The final design and location of the easement shall be'subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer.. , 7. That arrangements be made with the Public Works Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 8. That the unused drive apron be removed and replaced with curb, gutter and ;•„ a, full width sidewalk which shall be constructed along the Placentia Avenue frontage under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 9. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Public Works bepartment, along with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain facilities for'the on -site improvements prior to the issuance of grading permits or building permits. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. 10. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. " 11. That disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. 12. That overhead utilities serving the site shall be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19,24.140 of the Municipal Code. 1 - No construction, storage or delivery of materials shall be stored within the Placentia Avenue right-of-way and that an 8 foot wide pedestrian walkway be provided at all times except when the new sidewalk. is actually being placed. .2- 01 U A 14. That water services be provided per Costa Mesa Consolidated Water District Standards. 15. That any proposed landscaping or signs adjacent to the public right-of-way shall be approved by the Public Works Department. 16. That the occupancy of the four SRO style studio units shall be limited to one person each. 17. That the waiver of the Fair Share fee shall be subject to the City Council approval. 18. That development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit to be . approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 19. That a grading plan shall include a complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities, to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water,pollutants. 20. The siltation control plan shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, watering, and sweeping program designed to minimize impact of haul operations. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the prepared plan). 221 The landscape plan shall place heavy emphasis on the use of drought -resistant l/ native vegetation and be irrigated with a system designed to avoid surface runoff and over -watering. (2 That the lighting system shall be designed and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed electrical engineer; with a letter stating that this requirement has been met. 24. That the applicant shall enter into a Grant Deed and an Affordable Housing Agreement, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, guaranteeing that ten (10) 2-bedroom units within the project shall be made available on a preferential basis to persons and families possessing an "active" Section 8 Existing Rerital Assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section 8 Fair Market Rent (FMR) Schedule for Newport Beach. That the 4 SRO units shall be rented by individuals that makes no more than 30% of the Orange County median income as established on the State's Section 6932 income limits table and rented for no more than 3017o of that income. That the SRO rents may be adjusted upward relative to increases in the median income on the State's Section 6932 income table. Section 8 Certificate and Voucher holders may rent the 4 SRO units but not on a preferential basis. When a Section 8 tenant does not occupy a 2-bedroom unit, the unit shall be rented to persons and families earning a maximum income of no more than 80 percent of the median income for Newport Beach adjusted for family size as shown on the Section 6932 Income Limits Table at or below the HUD Fair Market rent. Said Grand Deed and Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded with - the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building; -3- LM �.i permits.,. The term of this agreement'shall be for no more than thirty (30) years. 25. That the project shall be redesigned so as to provide a minimum 5.192 foot side -yard setback. 26. That to the extent permitted by State and Federal law, preference shall be given to City of Newport Beach employees, with respect to the lease of rental units. 27. If any underground fuel tanks are found to be located on the subject property, the tanks shall be removed in accordancd with the requirements of the Newport Beach Fire Department and the Orange County Health Care Agency Environmental Health Division, 28. That prior to the issuance of demolition permits for onsite structures, all asbestos and other regulated hazardous or toxic material shall be removed from the site in acebrdance with the requirements of the Federal Environmental Protection Agency and any other state or local requirements. ADOPTED this26th day of November , 1990. ATTEST. JM\RES\CDBGMESA.CC2 9 3Mayor2 -4- NEWPORT HARBOR APARTMENTS II 2925 College Ave., 0A-3 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714) 979-9991 August 16, 1991 City of Newport Beach Planning Department P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92659-1768 RE: 15:) Placentia Avenue - Plaicheck Number 2568G-90 S.R.O. Units To Whom It May Concern: This letter shall serve as our acknowledgment and our intent to comply with -the -following conditions of approval. 1. The four S.R.O. units will be rented only to individualswho earn -no more than 30% of the Orange County A median income as established on the State Section 6932 income limits table. 2. The rent charged these individuafrg shall not exceed 30% of the Orange County median income- as established on the State Section 6932 income limits table. 3. Section 8 Certificate and Voucher holders may rent the four S.R.O. units but not on a preferential basis. If you should have any questions -or concerns please feel free to contact the undersigned. /Sincerely, Lawrence M. Campeau LMC:dh Llc. no. 374295 ELECTRICAL Doucz Scott gn407 Electric ci CONTRACTOR May 26, 1993 RE: Newport Harbor Apartments II This is to verify that all exterior building and walkway light fixtures installed by us are low wattage (13W) fluorescent fixtures. All carport lighting is 1-F40W fluorescent lamp per two (2) car stalls. No other type of exterior lighting fixtures exist on this project. Lighting for this project has been observed during the evening hours with full illumination present. There is no splash over lighting that could impact any neighboring properties. Sincerely, A Douglas S. Scott G( Doug Scott Electric 16028 Mt. Hicks • Fountain Valley, CA. 92708 9 (714) 775-0061 Is The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • URBAN DESIGN 03 June, 1993 City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 RE: NEWPORT HARBOR APTS. II; 1530 PLACENTIA AVENUE, NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA. To Whom This Shall Concern: Our firm, The Partnership, Landscape Architects prepared the landscape and irrigation construction plans for the above referenced project in 1991. On 02 June, 1993 - 1 walked the project to verify plan compliance. The landscape and irrigation Installation meets both construction plan and specification compliance with the exception of the pool area. The pool area modification has been reviewed and approved by this office. It was also noted that some plant sizes have been upgraded as well. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you. Very truly yours, �ffin W. De Witt, rincipai/Landscape Architect #2665 cc: L. Campeau, Mesa Development Project File Southland- 3198-8 Airport Loop Drive- Costa Mesa- California- 92626,• (714) 549-1175• FAX (714) 549-0115 Coachella Valley- 977 Rose Avenue- Palm Springs- California- 92262• (619) 325-6220 - MEMO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DATE: February 11, 1991 TO: File FROM: Genia Garcia, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Fair Share Fees Per discussions with William Ward, Senior Planner, Craig Bluell, Principal Planner and Jim Hewicker, Planning Director, the Fair Share fees have been included as waived in the adoption of Resolution #90-121. FV Ix- r41WVm.'z1- Genia Garcia Assistant Planner GG:jm I; r — ---- — — — — -- — -- 1`50� - g Rio - ,l -- --- — - -- - --- --- — --------- ----- - — --- - — - - — --- -- - - - -- — ----- - -- --- -- t -------- ------ --- 91