Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1 WHITECLIFFS_NEWPORT AQUATIC CENTER11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 *NEW FILE* I Whitecliffs n Alm newport aquatic center May 20, 1998 Planning Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92659 RE: Newport Aquatic Center Boat House Expansion Use Permit No. 3104 Gentlemen, The Newport Aquatic Center agrees to comply with the conditions of approval of Use Permit No. 3104 dated September 6, 1984. The conditions of approval, items 1 through 63, are recognized, including condition number 20, limiting hours of operation, and condition number 61, limiting daily trips. r cer ly, David Grant Presid nt One Whitecliffs Drive * Newport Beach, CA 92660 • 714/646-7725 June 18, 1998 TO: JAY GARCIA PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MANAGER SUBJECT: FAIR SHARE MEMO — Newport Aquatic Center, North Star Beach, Newport Beach An initial study for the Newport Aquatic Center was completed in July of 1984. The study included a TPO traffic analysis that determined a total of 876 daily trip ends on a winter weekday and 1196 daily trip ends on a summer weekday would be generated by this project. However, the final conditions of approval of the project limit the number of conditions to 250 participants per day or 500 trip ends per day. For the purposes of determining the Fair Share Fee, a summary of the existing and proposed square footage was summarized. The fee is based on the percentage of new square footage with the maximum of 500 trips per day generated by the project. The calculation is as follows: Existing Sq. Footage 7642 Proposed Sq. Footage 9636 Total Project Sq. Footage 17,278 Percentage of new Sq. footage = 9636/17,278 Total number of trips for the project = 500 trips Fee = (9636/17,278) x 500 trips x $127.67 per trip = 035,601.00 Please let me know if you have any questions about the fee. 4°a! e6lv"C�4 Richard M. Edmonston Transportation and Development Services Mgr. Vdivanlfairsharlmamoslnewportequatic 6.19.98 MEMORANDUM May 26, 1998 TO; Kevin Murphy, City Manager FROM: Christy Teague, Associate Planner NA,y ..�/ RE: Newport Aquatic Center (City Property Lease) #1 White Cliffs, North Star Beach Plan Check No. 2205-97 The Newport Aquatic Center has submitted plans for their second phase buildout. As part of our review, the Planning Department collects Fair Share fees based on the use and number of trips generated. It should be noted Use Permit 3104 applying to this project places a cap of 250 persons per day to the site. As a City project, all fees are being waived. In order for Fair Share fees to be waived, Municipal Code Section 15.38.085 requires application be made to the City Manager based upon a showing that the trip generation rate is inapplicable to the proposed use. Please notify our office of your determination regarding the Fair Share fees at the Newport Aquatic Center. Thank you for your consideration. City of I lewport Beach P.Building Deppaartment �-4 BUILDING O. EDNewwrr /Beach, CA 92658-8915 �j A P P L I C Phone: (714) 644.3288 / IIP NEW _ ADO C. ALTER ❑ REPAIR L DEMOLISH C_ as .. Pwn X / j'-( y/ so rt m• OF LICEN5ED 611TRACTORS DECLARATION 1 HEREBY AIFIRM THAT AM LICENSED UNDER PROVISIONS OF- CHAPTER B pCONIA CNCING WITH SECTION TO= OF DIVISION S OF THE BUSINESS AND BOFESSIONS CODE. AND MY LICENSE 1$ IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. LICENSCCLASS� LIC.NO, CONTPA:TOR DATE OWNER -BUILDER DECLARAT40N 1 HEREBY AFFIRM THAT I AM EXEMPT FROM THE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE LAW FOR THE FOLLOWING RCASON ISEC. 1..' 5 BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE ANY CITY OP COUNTY WHICH REOUIRCS A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT. ALTER. IMPROVE DEMOLISH OR REPAIR ANY STRUCTURE PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE ALSO RCOUIRES THE APPLICANT FOR SUCH PERMIT TO FILL A SIGNED STATEMENTTIIAT NEIS LICENSED PURSUANTTO TYEHPS CTnOVISON`7000' OF DIV SIONAS or THEI IS Or THE CO1ITFb�7OFIIBUSINESS ANDNPROFESSIONSMCODE IIOR 'trAT ME IS EXEMPT OF AND THE BASIS POR THE ALLEGED EXEMPTION, ANY .IOLATION OF SECTION TOSt 5 BY ANY APPLICANT FA PERMIT SUBJECTS THE APPLICANT TO A CIVIL PENALTY OF NOT MORE THAN FIVEOR HUNDRED DOLLARS ISSOOU' t AS OW%ER OF THE PROPERTY Oq MY EIPLOVCES,WITH WAGES AS T..RRSOLC COMPENSATION WILL DO THE WORK. AND THE STRUCTURE IS NOT'INTENDED OR DIFEREC FOR SALE (SEC. 7041 UUSINCSS AND PROFESSIONS CODE' THE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE LAW DOEa NOT APPLY TO AN OWNER OF PROPCRTY "NO BUILDS On 4MPROVCS T�ENEON A.., WHO DOES SUCH IR.SELr OR THROUGH IRS OWN CMPLOYECS PROVIDED THAT SUCK IMPROVEMENTS NARE NOT WC.DCD OR OFFERED FOR SALE IF, HOWEVER, THE DUILDING OR IMPROVEMENT IS SOLD WITHIN TNC YEAR or COMPLETION, T BURDEN Of PROVING THAT MC BID NOT BUILD ORNPROVC FOR THE PURPOSE or SALE w5I "I OF THE PROPERTY AM EXCLBSIVECY CONTRACTING WITH LICENSED COry TRACTCPS TO (CONSTRUCT THE PROJECT (SEC 7044 BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS COTE. THE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE LAW GOES NOT APPLY TO AN 'OWNR TF PROPERTY M'NO BUILDS OR IMPRTVES TMNCON AND IRO CONTRACTS ,OR SUCK PROJECTS WIT. A CONTRACTORISI LICENSED PURSUANT TO THE CONTRACTORS LICENSE LA W t 1 AM CXEMPT UNDER SEC B AP C FOR THIS REASON DATE WORK MUST BE STARTED WITHIN A P' PLAN CHECK VALIDATION tK PERMIT... �5a� ato ITIONGb PLAN LITY (CROSS STJ /f� , 'n1,?/S ; 1II . AREA GNP CONST JjV )ING APPROVAL RCOUIREO ❑ YES ❑ NO CJ,RE P RKING CES _ nfi__._. E I�Li (r�.•{(,L4LLc�TAL�S _ IS- COMPENSATION DECLARATION 1 HAVE A CERTIFICATE OF CONSENT TO SELFNNSURE OR A rnn COMPENSATION INSURANCE OR A CFRTIFICD COPY O CERTIFIED COPY 1S VIER IBI FURNISNE / ❑ CERTIFIED COPY 19 FILED NITII THE BVIL G. NT DATE APPLICANT - CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPT O RO WORY.F.RS' COMPENSATION S NCE ?HIS SECTION NEED HOT BE COMPLETED If 'AC PERMIT IS FOR ONE NLM1ORLD DOLLARS ISIDOI OR LESS' I CERTIFY THAT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK ION WNNCN THIS PENN,N 1S SSUED I SHALL NOT SUBJECT TO THE WORKERS `COMP NSATIOHOY ANY RLAWS Of CAL•FORHIR IN ANY MANNCR 50 AS TO BCCOIAE DATE APPLICANT(_ I NDTIOC TO APPLCANT. AF. AFTER IAAKING THIS CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION YOU SHOULD BECOME SUBJECT TO THE WORKERS' COMPENSA7104 PROVISIONS OF THC LABOR CODE YOU MUST FORTHWITH COMPLY WITH SUCH PROVISIONS ORTHS PEOHIT SHALL BE DECOEO REVOKED. 1 CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY 1 I HEREBY AFFIRM T4AT THERE IS A CONSTRUCTION LENDING AOENC FOR Tirt PERFORMANCE Of INC WORK FOR WHICH THIS PERMIT IS 19CUEO 'SEC S097 CIVC 1 LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 NAVE BRAD-TMIS SPPLICATIOH-AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE I INFORMATION IS CORRECT 1 AGREE TO COMPLY WIT" ALL CITY AND COUNTY ORDINANCEAUTHORIIES AND STATE LAWS RCPRESENTATIVCS LATING TO or THIS UILtING C-JNTYOITO RENTIO. ER AEREBY UPONTHE AUOVE•MENTIONED PROPERTY IOR INSPECTION PURPOSES ES D Oine, Fees $ — / _ PICFee $ Pertnll Fee S________ Final Val. $ Adi. PX Fee CSD $ Total Fees DF 1e0 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF VALIDATION OR THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID MD CASH PERMIT VALIDATION CK MIO CASH nLIN r newport aquatic center May'20, 1998 Planning Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92659 RE: Newport Aquatic Center Boat House Expansion Use Permit No. 3104 Gentlemen, The Newport Aquatic Center agrees to comply with the conditions of approval of Use Permit No. 3104 dated September 6, 1984. The conditions of approval, items 1 through 63, are recognized, including condition number 20, limiting hours of operation, and condition number 61, limiting daily trips. Sincer ly, David Grant Presid nt One Whitediffs Drive e Newport Beach, CA 92660 e 714/646-7725 June 18, 1998 TO: JAY GARCIA PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MANAGER SUBJECT: FAIR SHARE MEMO — Newport Aquatic Center, North Star Beach, Newport Beach An initial study for the Newport Aquatic Center was completed in July of 1984. The study included a TPO traffic analysis that determined a total of 876 daily trip ends on a winter weekday and 1196 daily trip ends on a summer weekday would be generated by this project. However, the final conditions of approval of the project limit the number of conditions to 250 participants per day or 500 trip ends per day. For the purposes of determining the Fair Share Fee, a summary of the existing and proposed square footage was summarized. The fee is based on the percentage of new square footage with the maximum of 500 trips per day generated by the project. The calculation is as follows: Existing Sq. Footage 7642 Proposed Sq. Footage 9636 Total Project $q. Footage 17,278 Percentage of new Sq. footage = 9636/17,278 Total number of trips for the project = 500 trips Fee = (9636/17,278) x 500 trips x $127.67 per trip = $35,601.00 Please let me know if you have any questions about the fee. all Richard M. Edmonston Transportation and Development Services Mgr. 69 L4 H - 33i-f-kj Vdivan\fairshar\memos\newportaquatic 6.19.98 NEWPORT AQUATIC CENTER SQUARE FOOTAGE ANALYSIS Existiniz Square Footage (Net) Public Restrooms 158 Showers/Locker Rooms 2,570 Boat Storage Area 4,386 Office 150 Corridor 378 TOTAL EXISTING 7,642 New Square Footage (Net) Exercise Room 1,813 Boat Garage 1,289 Boat Storage 4,400 Lobby 295.5 Storage Room 420 Multi -Purpose Room 590 Office 332.5 Corridor 496 TOTAL NEW 9636 EXISTING 7,642 NEW 9,636 TOTAL NET SQ FTG 17.278 This addition brings the Newport Aquatic Center to its full buildout entitlement. COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIALCORRECTIONS ZONING CO r Telephone: (714) 644-3200 Plan Check No: ��2205- q / % Christy Teague,te Plannex By:Genia Garcia, Associate Planner By.�Associa By:Marc Myers, Associate Planner /By: Date: Address: Address: Districting Map No. Description of Project: Zone\General Plan Land Use f%S -Q- Proposed Use �`7GuJpOt/� (ya/ fGCr�dLc�/ Corrections Required: P P44-de1s /orw- 10 z R0 /V✓)'4r-p /)-A Legal Description: Lot Block Section Tract Resubdivision required to combine lots or portions of lots when construction or alterations are in excess of $20,480. Covenant required. Please have owner's signature notarized on the attached document and return to me. /' Lot Size/Tenant Sq. Footage %j A'L�6 / �fJs/opA0 Required Setbacks 1 , Front <<2I1 I(�P/{'yl Si�J.J,2ieJhlt--SlYle lOr7O' jpK (rIG7:...od/L2%O f %7I v( f,Y/�si'2J /fte Ylvsft� Remarks: [lif IA,-DlI l/,a.✓1 a1'"!5 8,� 2Z� 5^Gl - �ArPt J•-� N0 1 �1� s d / • PrV9 rA-9 FAR WORKSHEET Lot area (site area sq.ft.): sq.ft.�� O Z Base Development Allocation (BDA): comet sq.ft. (0.5 x site area sq.ft., unless otherwise specified in Land Use Element) e FAR permitted, with/without variance: (A) comet res pkg 1 $J �J Z Square footage permitted: comet res pkq sq.ft. ((A) x site area sq.ft.J PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: (C) Base FAR use sq.ft. Sq.ft. (D) Reduced FAR use sq.ft. (E) Maximum FAR use sq.ft. (F) TOTAL SQ.FT. [C+D+E) Sq.ft. Sq.ft. sq.ft. PROPOSED FAR: ( F + site area sq.ft. J PROPOSED WEIGHTED DEVELOPMENT: FAR Use Category Weighting Factor Weighted Sq.ft, (G) (H) ( G x H ) sq.ft. Base X 1.00 sq.ft. sq.ft. Reduced X 1.67 sq.ft. -sq.ft. Maximum X 0.50 sq.ft. TOTAL WEIGHTED SQ.FT.(May not exceed BDA) Provide tissue overlay of calculations to verify provided square footage. t�K Parking ( ndlcate number of stalls provided) Stb�L'(jF---Pv j(r0(,�IG,+ FK) al q-pK4. Total On -Site Parking Required Provided Jj�GiG{O(-PCf� (03 iV.� , ,l )vie fs�c I beeLC tt�y�p� J Dimension building height as mea r d fr a gr_a to midpoint zfnd maximum ri rina r,,.,f �,e; ,.�.,- r r i i- Show natural grade line on all et + - AShow all rooftop mechanical equipment and dimension from grade directly below. 01/� Indicate location of trash containers on site plan. Llq�2 r Floor Plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences, a ic, in relation to the property line. •��'`jpi4 (7j,1dei:eki-5j y1eev � ' _ Fair Share Contribution / Y YJ )A.— San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee ' SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH$ Please indicate any discretionary approval numbers er the plans and Incorporate the attachedt excerpt of minutes and list of findings and conditions into the blueline drawings approval letter into the blueline drawings Modifications Committee: Indicate Approval No, on Bluelines Modification required for PSannino Commission/City Counoil:. iL7q p 4Atveh poLw-) /418� Use Permit: No. variance; No. Resubdivision/Tract: No.—�(%F3(�N+ Trsc�fSc -PPY- 11,2.2$0 Site Plan Review: No. pgyAa¢jC. ruGIII -��l� [f --� Amendment: No. Y Lam--- Other fraent PublicWorks:L,, n�te�r-,�, //Easement/EncroaPermit *19b r t 1�/( eR Pr1 vv� Subdivision Engineer.-(9Gi0� � 1�.} l,/YLV/YLAIVII�t - - Traffic Eof Lan l P iA,((Diii Approval of Lan spa Plan9 SP✓1/(`C.PS ''�`(' Building Department: Grading Engineer Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans (if AM L�+� P Coastal Development Permits: y 2 a x41 1 Approval In Concept (AIC) No. G (Note; File 3 sets of plans: site, floor, and elevations) Coastal Development Permit: 140e Date'� ----^ Waiver/Exemption: Effective date: REMARKS: f F Ialyl -r11 ►$$F ' ` liaant to airbulatd his plans �&'� NOTE: Tt is the responsibility of th app obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above• If you have questions regarding re�`ga��rt�ding�yyour applicat�i`on��, flpalease conta/c�t,�me at (7l4) 644- 3200. �i1�1 e V" a $ �kC41 iQcl 00'41 I OV L S & ' r� YPY(IJ1 a l j�ll3� i�/iLj • °e 1tlA4\CoIW'LtlN.COA ����� �/� r�t�i L� 6'v-VI&AA av o +VV--:5r6 AA gyp ✓ Y`iA A -av 104 M2IWA 0 1, c" w�1 r s ; jv {vim �P }ovz�✓A t f f, I jP 3'7vql Oel'v2ol 3-z- (1-4 S,,X6 LIO Z -7 FO Ss')c fro woo - (44. /sc> Mc 4- r. Ay-eA 14 -3-75 76 q t September 6, 1984 MINUTES m n x T ' m m s City of Newport Beach soon son a of the City, and further that the proposed project in terms of use, height, building floor area and setbacks is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of the Municipal Code. 3. Adequate off-street parking and related vehicular circulation are being provided in conjunction with the proposed development. 4. The development will provide for both public physical and visual access to the bay. 5. That the height of the structure is consistent with the proposed use and will not, adve;sely affect any public view. 6. That the project is generally consistent with the ballot measure approved by the electors in June, 1982 allowing the lease of North Star Beach for an Aquatic Center. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivi- sion. 8. That the size and use of the Aquatic Center as approved by this Use Permit represents the full extent of the authority granted to the City pursuant to the approval of Proposition 0 in 1982. CONDITIONS 1. That development shall be in substantial confor- rLany �A, mance with the approved plot plan, floor plan, and K J elevations except as noted below. 2. That all improvements be constructed as required by ordinance and the Public Works Department. 3. That a standard use permit agreement and vying surety be provided if it is desirediced to to ff� obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 4. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation i and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to let further review by the Traffic'Engineer. 10 I ROLL MMISSIONERS September 6, 1984 MINUTES m - fi x � S c • v y -1 a ° m pity of Newport Beach INDEX 5. That the design of the private drives conform with the City's Private Street Policy (L-4), except as approved by the Public Works Department. The location, width, configuration, and concept of the private drive system shall be subject to further review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer. Pam/ 6. That the intersection of the public street and proposed drive be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 25 miles per hour. G Slopes, landscaping, walls and other obstructions shall be considered in the sight distance require- ments. Landscaping within the sight distance line shall not exceed twenty-four (24) inches in height. The sight distance requirements may be approximately modified at non -critical locations, subject to approval of the Traffic Engineer. 7. Handicap parking shall be provided to meet code plkj and shall be marked in a manner acceptable to the Traffic Engineer. S. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared and approved by the Public Works Department, along w with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain facilities for the on -site improvements prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required shall be the responsibility of the developer. 9. That a legal description of the subject property y�K be prepared and approved by the Planning Depart- ment, Building Department and Public Works Depart- ment prior to issuance of any grading or building permit. 10,. That all proposed signs shall be in conformance PA with the provision of Chapter 20.06 of the Newport v)✓livi^ Beach Municipal Code and shall be approved by the F City Traffic Engineer if located adjacent to the vehicular ingress and egress. 11. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape archi- PlAn fi4, tect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. Prior to 11 ROLL i. September 6, 3984 MINUTES m n � m a City of Newport Beach INDEX occupancy, a licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the approved plan. 12. The landscape plan shall be subject to the ieview of the Public Works Department, the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department, and the approval of the �frCi. Planning Department. �JJ 13. The landscape plan shall include a maintenance program which controls the use of fertilizers and pesticides. 46 14. The landscape plan shall place heavy emphasis on P the use of drought -resistant native vegetation, and be irrigated with a system designed to avoid �) 5 surface runoff and overwatering. 15. That a minimum of 63 parking spaces be provided for the proposed development. These parking spaces �;I-G�1YlV1I VVI/ shall be secured by a chain or gate at the entrance on North Star Lane in accordance with the In7 operating hours of the Aquatic Center. 16. That all employees shall park their vehicles L.�_4&j' on -site. 17. If a parking area for the storage of boat trailers L-&+W is provided, this parking shall be in addition to the 63 parking spaces required by the project. 18. That the maximum height of the building not exceed Plot, YIY1IV�' 20 feet. 0 k- / 19. That the specific use and function of the facility eoolVY15��� be subject to further review and approval of the City as part of the ground lease and required Sw.e I.Wnf Facilities Management Plan. 20. The hours of operation will be limited to a.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily, and that no outdoor programs will be offered after the hour of 7:00 LE p.m. Only advanced training activities are permitted between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. 21. That no new boat fabrication will occur on -site. I LZ W' / 12 MMISSIONERS September 6, 1984 m o x 5 m u City of - Newport Beach. MINUTES INDEX 22. Trailering of boats to or from the site shall 1.14kil occur only between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00' p.m. 23. No overnight accommodations will be provided Le 44ir/ on -site, other than the coordinator apartment. F^1170CF) DOE 24. The on -site coordinator staff shall be subject to the approval of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department. A member of the on -site coordinator L.j-}t staff shall be on the premises at all times. Thec�.�, coordinator shall have the authority to restrict use of the facility to individuals with motor CfPIPiPGI vehicles which are in conformance with the Motor Vehicle Code. 25. The weight training facilities will be used by Le.wi:.-e aquatic program participants, and will not be available for independent weight training pro- grams. 26. Outdoor boat storage shall be limited to seasonal LZ Ate-/ storage of outrigger canoes. 27. Parking lot lighting shall be designed in such a (� manner as to conceal the light source and to FUVV11 minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared by a licensed Electrical Engineer; with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion this requirement has been met. 28. That the parking lot shall be secured by gates as shown on the approved site plan. The gates shall be locked.no later than 10:30 p.m. 29. The parking lot lighting shall be turned off no later than 10:30 p.m. on any day, and timing devices shall be installed and maintained to �M ensure that the lights are turned of at 10:30 p.m.' 30. No outdoor public address system shall be }T-117 permitted. 31. Restrooms shall be made available to members of the general public during the center's hours of operation. W September 6, 1984 MINUTES m o x T � c m . • 'O � y -1 L) c N O n of Newport Beach ROLL CALL wmwwX 32. This use permit shall expire unless exercised GEC&ra:v within 36 months from the date of approval. VI)A 33. Construction of the project may be phased so long O K as no part of the facility is constructed prior to the boat storage facility. 34. That the Planning Commission may add/or modify conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend to the City Council the revocation of k this use permit, upon a determination that the a operation which is the subject of this use permit causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the community. 35. Construction of the bulkhead is subject to ap- proval of a Harbor Permit, and is also subject to W the approval of the County of Orange, Harbor, Beaches and Parks Department. 36. That an engineering study be prepared -to determine the appropriate design for the bay frontage. G'mpwled Bulkheads, rock revetments, or other facilities recommended by the study shall be constructed to 0 adequately protect the onsite improvements. Newport Aquatic Center shall agree to construct, maintain, and repair the bayside facilities. The City or other public agencies shall have no responsibility to provide repairs to facilities flooded or damaged by erosion from the bay and adjacent drainage course, or to otherwise protect the improvements constructed on the site. 37. The project shall comply with the Uniform Building Code and all local Amendments, and the City's 13) seismic design standards. 38. The project shall comply with the State regu- L30) lations for the handicapped. 39. Construction shall meet the requirements of Title 19 and 24 of the C.A.C. 40. Access to the service road circling the aquatic complex shall be controlled by the means of a gate or other features to prevent use by the general public. 14 CC)MMISSIONERSI September 6, 1984 MINUTES m o x � � c m m ° m City of Newport Beach 41. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) Permit shall be obtained from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board if any discharges to the Bay are anticipated either during construction or subsequent operation of the facility. 42. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, an Army Corps of Engineers Permit shall be obtained to allow construction of the proposed bulkhead and docking facilities. 43. Residents should be provided with a point of contact with the Newport Aquatic Center manage- ment, to handle complaints of noisy vehicles in the parking lot or on local streets. 44. All mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened from public streets, alleys, or adjoining properties. 45. Exterior lighting shall be approved by the Plan- ning Department. 46. Development of the site may be subject to a grading permit to be approved by the Building and Planning Department. 47. A grading plan will include a complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities, to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants. 48. The grading permit will include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, and watering and sweeping programs designed to mini- mize impacts of grading and haul operations. 49. An erosion, siltation, and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to approval by the Building Department and a copy will be forwarded to the California Regional water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 50. Grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer and based on recommendations of a soils engineer and an engi- neering geologist subsequent to completion of a 15 INDEX _p . -1 Le41e-1 OA 0 rn K J 0 IL PVrl h"I'l grade gv��EdIOJ COMMISSIONERS September 6, 1984 MINUTES m o x f � m0 0 m City of Newport Beach .ROII CAI INDEX comprehensive soils and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent reproduction copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans on standard -size sheets shall be furnished to the Building Depart- ment. 51. The Fire Department shall review design plans to ensure adequate access and emergency exists. 52. The provision of adequate fire .flow shall be reviewed by the Fire Department. 53. Structures shall be equipped with fire suppression systems as required by Code. 54. Final design of the project shall provide for the incorporation of water -saving devices for lavatories and other water -using facilities. 55. All onsite drainage shall be approved by the City Public Works Department. 56. A weekly cleanup program around the project site shall be conducted on a regular basis. During construction, basins or other devices shall be installed to prevent waste from entering Newport Bay. 57. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a comprehensive soils and foundation study will be prepared and approved by the Planning and Building Departments of the City of Newport Beach. 58. Should'any archaeological resources be uncovered during excavation/construction, a qualified archaeologist or paleontologist shall evaluate the site prior to completion of construction activ- ities, and all work on the site shall be done in accordance with the City Council Policies and K-5 and K-6. 59. Any mechanical equipment and emergency power generators shall be screened from view, and noise associated with said structures shall be sound attenuated so as not to exceed 55 dBA at the property lines. The latter shall be based upon the recommendations of the qualified acoustical engineer and approved by the Building Department. Fiy,e PiV'"C 13I�9 pV_,7 L- 4e-e 16 COMMISSIONERS September 6, 1984 MINUTES m' x S � C m A City of Newport Beach p ROLL CALL INDEX 60. All construction activities will be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:Oo p.m. Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday and r' Sunday. 61. Use of the site shall be limited to a maximum of 250 persons per day. 62. The Dover Shores Community Association shall be allowed to elect a representative to the Aquatic tX�7LiV Center Board of Directors. 63. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant�� limiting use of the facility to that allowed by qq� the terms of the lease as executed by City LL'nm SvL Council. econvened at 9:30 p.m. Use P it No. 3108 (Continued Public Hearing) Item No.2 Request permit- the establishment of a retail art Use Permit gallery/stu 'o on property located in the M-1 District. No. 3108 LOCATION: is 6 and 7, Block 328, Lancaster's A 'tion, located Approved at 912 Layfayette Avenue, on the Condition- easter side of Layfayette Avenue, ally between 9th Street and 30th Street, in Cannery Vi age. ZONE: M-1 APPLICANT: Paul Blain Henrie, ewport Beach OWNER: Loma Linda University, Loma Linda Mr. William Laycock, Current Planning A inistrator, advised that the Planning Staff has recomm ded that the following two conditions be added if the lanning Commission desires to approve this Use rmit. Condition No. 5: "That 'the second floor areas . all only be used by the artist or the gallery manager fo a studio, office, or storage purposes", and Condition No. 17 ROLL Motion All Ayes x REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION ME2�':NG PG2%r��✓-'�J PLACE: City Council Chambers MITES TIME: 7 :30 .p. m. DATE: September 6, 1984 City of �m James D. Robert H. MEMBERS Beach Planning Director City Attorney William R. Laycock, Curren Planning Administrator Robert Lenard, Advance Plann g Administrator Patricia Temple, Environmentanator Donald Webb, City Engineer Dee Edwards, Secretary Staff recommended that Item No. 6, Use PermN No. 3113, be continued to the Planning, Commission M ting of September 20, 1984. Motion was made to continue this item to the P Commission Meeting of September 20, 1984, which CARRIED. * * r A. -Traffic -Study -(Continued.Public Hearing-) Request to consider a traffic study so as to permit the construction of a multi -use Aquatic Center in the Unclassified District. F:F17 B. Use Permit No. 3104 (Continued Public Hearing) Request to permit the construction of a multi -use Aquatic Center in the Unclassified District which includes indoor boat storage, an indoor exercise room, coordinator apartment, locker rooms, weight training room, multi -purpose assembly room, boat workshop, and related off-street parking spaces. The proposal also includes a request to construct the proposed building at a height of 20 feet and the acceptance of an environmental document. Item kl Traf f is Study Use Permit No. 3104 Both Approved Condition- ally nAA AAISSK)NFRSI September 6, 1984. MINUTES m n x � � c � 1 c m City of Newport Beach INDEX ROLL CALL LOCATION: A portion of Lot 165, Irvine's Subdivision, located at 420 North Star Lane on the northerly side of North Star Lane, easterly of White Cliffs Drive, in Westcliff. ZONE: Unclassified APPLICANTS:, City of Newport Beach and the Newport Beach Aquatic Center, Newport Beach OWNERS: City of Newport Beach and the County of Orange In response to questions posed by Commissioner Turner, Planning Director -Hewicker indicated that the project could be constructed in phases and that the lease could be drafted to be consistent with various conditions placed on the Use Permit. Mr. Hewicker also suggested consideration of a longer approval than the standard 24 months in recognition of the many permits the applicant must secure prior to commencement of construction. The public hearing opened in connection with this item and Mr. Fred Talarico, 359 San Miguel, Newport Beach, representing the applicant, appeared before the Commission. Mr. Talarico stated that he and the applicants had met with the homeowners; Homeowners Associations, and the Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission to discuss the concerns that have been expressed to the applicants. Mr. Talarico noted that the Aquatic Center has received support from the Parks, Beaches, & Recreation commission for the project. Additionally, he stated that the revised project meets all of the conditions of the Dover Shores Homeowners Association's Board of Directors, and that the Mariners Homeowners Association have stated they will not make any comments on the project. Mr. Talarico briefly described the proposed reduction of the project from 61,000 sq. ft. to 18,228 sq. ft., and 850 to 250 daily users. Also indicated was the concurrance of the applicant with all the findings and conditions of approval as outlined in the staff report as well as the willingness to include a representative 2 ri�nn nnICCICINFRiI September 6, 1984 MINUTES m n x -1 m � � m City of Newport Beach INDEX of the Dover Shores Homeowners Assoication on the Aquatic Center Board of Directors. Mr. Bill Whitford,' 436 Hamilton, Costa Mesa, representative of the Newport Aquatic Center, presented information regarding the number of participants utilizing the Harbor Area for human -powered boating activities. Mr. Whitford stated that during the summer months there is a considerable amount of activity and interest in outrigger canoeing and related programs. Mr. Whitford additionally stated that during the winter months the Harbor Area attracts many foreign visitors training for the Olympics and other athletes who utilize the weather and water. He said that there is presently a definite lack of storage for equipment, house facilities and programs, and that the revised project will provide a basic facility to accommodate existing programs. Mr. Robert E. Harris, 415 North Star Lane, Newport Beach, spoke in opposition to the Aquatic Center. Mr. Harris indicated that the 18,000 sq. ft. facility being considered is larger than his conception of the proposal approved by the voters in Proposition O. Mr. Harris submitted a proposal to the Planning Commission recommending that a joint committee be established consisting of residents of Dover Shores, a City or County representative, and the applicant, establishing: 1) a compatible facility with the residential community, 2) an irrevocable covenant which will remain permanent as to any future change -of physical facilities, 3) an absolute limit to the number of memberships, and 4) no activity would be permitted that did not directly relate to man -propelled vehicles, 4) facilities similar to UCI and OCC. Mr. Peter Drummond, 1706 Antigua Way, Newport Beach, President of Dover Shores Homeowners Association addressed the Commission. Mr. Drummond briefly reviewed the Homeowners presentation at the July 19, 1984, Planning commission meeting. He stated that the Homeowners Association has met with the City, Aquatic Center Planners,and Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission, since the July 19, 1984 meeting, and he indicated that the revised project is more satisfactory to the Homeowners Association. However, the homeowners are still concerned about the traffic change near the facility and the possibility of additional development occuring on North Star Beach in the future. Mr. 3 CALL MMISSIONERS September 6, 1984 m n 7, 0 C v 0 m City of Newport Beach Drummond suggested the following: 1) limit the facility to 18,000 square feet; 2) limit the activity and daily useage to 250 people per day; 3) limit the acreage to two acres or whatever is appropriate to accomodate the revised plan; 4) leave the balance of the area in its pristine state for public use; 5) include a homeowner on the Aquatic Center Board; and'6) record an Agreement between the interested parties to maintain these limits and conditions. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Person, City Attorney Burnham indicated that the land site area leased for the facility is controlled by the City Council, but that a finding could be made stating that the size and configuration of the facility approved is the maximum considered consistent with the provisions of Proposition O by the Planning Commission. Mr. Burnham further recommended to the Commission imposition of an additional condition that the use of the facility be limited as ultimately defined by the lease, and that the applicant record a restrictive covenant to limiting the use of the facilities. Imposition of a condition to that effect will require an amendment to the Use Permit if any additional construction or use is proposed in the future. Mrs. Pat Voss, 1219 Santiago Drive, Newport Beach, spoke in opposition to the Aquatic Center stating that the resulting traffic hazards in a residential community were unacceptable. MINUTES Mr. David Grant, 2205 Cliff Drive, Newport Beach, present rowing coach from Orange Coast College, spoke in favor of the Aquatic Center, explaining that there is a very active interest in rowing among people of all ages. Mr. Albert Brandli, 419- Evening Star Lane, Newport Beach, spoke in opposition to the Aquatic Center. Mr. Brandli felt that the facility would be used only by a special interest group and he expressed concern about the number of boats moving in and out of the residential area as well as the lack of trailer storage space. Mr. Bruce Severtson, Costa Mesa, a member of the U.S. National Rowing Team and a member of the 1980 and 1984 Olympic teams, spoke about the positive impact of the INDEX 4 ROLL MMISSIONERS September 6, 1984 m o x s � m m City of Newport Beach Aquatic Center in the area, and the need for a local training facility. Ms. Sheila Conover, 2949 Cliff Dr., Newport Beach, a member of the 1984 blympic Canoe and Kayak Teams, related to the Commission the inconvenience of training at UCI; how the Aquatic Center will benefit all athletes interested in human -power craft, and how the programs will develop people of all ages. Mr. Brad Lewis, 505 Begonia Avenue, Corona del Mar, a member of the 1984 Olympic Team, stated that 9 Olympic Rowing Team members recently trained in the Harbor Area preparing for the Olympics. He told the Commission that there is a big need for a' training site, and a place to store and wash down boats. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Turner, Mr. Lewis estimated that approximately 25-50 elite rowers are active in the Southern California area. Mr. William Conover, 2249 Cliff Drive, Newport Beach, commented on how many athletes from all over the world were training for the 1984 Olympics in the Newport Harbor area and he feels the Aquatic Center would be a wonderful addition to the community. MINUTES Mr. Marshall Stewart, 315 North Star Lane, Newport Beach spoke in opposition to the Aquatic Center. Mr. Stewart.stated that the people_using_the facility would not be local citizens but would be people from outside of Newport Beach. He also stated that the facility will become commercial, and he is very concerned about the users parking on the street instead of inside the designated parking area. Mr. Tom Miller, 219� Agate Avenue, Balboa Island, spoke in favor of the Aquatic Center. Mr. Miller emphasized the importance the Aquatic Center will have with the young people in the Newport Harbor Area, and stated that the facility will become a source of pride in the community in the future. Mrs. Barbara Whitford, 406 Snug Harbor Road, Newport Beach, a Newport Beach Recreation Department sailing instructor, spoke in favor of the Aquatic Center commenting that the human -powered craft training areas that were used many years ago have now disappeared and INDEX 5 rn � � m c • v v � p L) c N 6 CALL Motion Substitute Motion September 6, 1984 of Newport Beach 250 daily users for both the Aquatic Center programs and Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Department programs. Planning Commission Chairman Winburn closed the public hearing at this time. Commissioner Turner questioned if the curve from Polaris Drive going into the facility could be expanded because of the potential difficulty of a boat trailer traveling through that area. City Engineer Webb indicated that there is probably not enough extra room to expand the curve. Mr.Webb further stated that the existing street configuration should be adequate, and that the potential volume of trailer traffic would `not warrant any major modifications. However, Mr. Webb commented that a test could be made by taking a boat trailer down to that area and if needed, it is possible that modifications could be made to make the area safer. MINUTES Planning Commissioner Turner stated that he had supported Proposition O with the understanding that it: was going to be a boat facility used mainly for the youth in the area, commenting that at that time he did not realize what the traffic or what the impact would have on the area. He further stated that he believes the facility is still larger than what Proposition O intended; that there is insufficient documentation of the need for this facility and that there is a definite problem of access. Commissioner Turner then made a motion to deny Use Permit No. 3104. Commissioner Person stated he would not support the motion. Commissioner Person further stated that he was opposed to the 61,000 sq. ft facility but the revised project has been scaled down to an acceptable level and he believes the Planning Commission has the ability to condition this application so that the facility will not be over -used. Commissioner Person cited that 67% of the voters favored the facility in 1962, and that the majority of the local homeowners are in favor of the scaled -down version of the project. A substitute motion was made to approve Use Permit No. 3104 subject to the findings and conditions contained in Exhibit "A" with the following additions and changes: add Finding No. 8 as follows: That the size and use of the Aquatic Center as approved by this Use Permit represents the full extent of the authority granted to the City pursuant to the approval of Proposition O in 1982", Amend Condition No. 32 from 24 INDEX 7 ROLL CALL MMISSIONERS1 September 6, 1984 m 0 x � � c m m City of Newport Beach feels that there is a need for a facility with public access for all people. Mrs. Jerry Holmes, 1146 Polaris Drive, Newport Beach, spoke in opposition to the Aquatic Center stating that she feels the residential area will become a commercial area and many parking problems'will develop. Mr. Peter Drummond returned to speak to the Commission. He stated that the residents are not opposed to rowing or a rowing facility, but the homeowners would like to see the Aquatic Center moved to Shellmaker Island. He recommended that contacts be made at a higher level in the Fish and Game Department regarding the ecological reserve. In response to a question posed by Chairman Winburn, Mr. Drummond stated that the Homeowners Association would prefer the entire parking area be secured with a chain or gate by the Aquatic Center in accordance with the operating hours of the facility. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Turner, Mr. Drummond indicated that the homeowners had been polled and that the majority favor the smaller facility, however, the residents still consider the traffic impact on the community to - be of, primary concern. MINUTES Mr. Fred Talarico summarized the position of the applicant by indicating a commitment to a maximum 18,228 sq. ft. facility with 250 daily users. Additionally, the applicants agree to any covenant, restriction or binding which the City makes in this regard. Mr. Talarico further indicated the applicants intent to lease only that section of the site occupied by the Aquatic Center and parking lot. In response to a question by Commissioner Winburn, Mr. Talarico stated that there are presently five outrigger canoe clubs in the Harbor Area. These clubs store their boats on beaches scattered throughout the bay and that the Harbor Department area is presently leased on a month -to -month basis for outrigger canoe storage. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Turner, Environmental Coordinator Temple stated that the analysis contained in the staff report was based on data provided by the applicant and assumed a maximum of INDEX A COMMISSIONERS September 6, 1984 MINUTES m 'o � � � c 8, ' 1 m ., m City of Newport Beach ROLL CALL INDEX Ayes Noes Ix months to 36 months; Amend Condition No. 62 allowing for the Dover Shores Homeowners Association on the Aquatic Center's Board of Directors; Add Condition No. 63 as follows: The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant limiting use of the facility to that allowed by the terms of the lease as executed by the City Council"; In addition to the action on Use Permit 3104, the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that no more land than is necessary to accommodate- the building and parking lot should be leased to the applicant. Commissioner Kurlander motioned to amend Condition No. 15 requiring all parking spaces to be secured by a chain or gate in accordance with the operating hours of. the Aquatic Center. Commission Person accepted the amendment. Commissioner Goff stated that the site could accommodate approximately 55 dwelling units if developed at 6 dwelling units per acre. In this case, the traffic and parking impacts would be significantly higher lthan the proposed project. He, therefore, indicated his support of the substitute motion. Planning Commission Chairman Winburn stated she will support the substitute motion, further stating that she would like to see the beach remain open for public use. She also indicated her support for a recommendation to the City Council that the lease is only to cover that portion of the beach occupied by the building and parking lot. _ Commissioner Person's substitute motion to accept the Environmental Document and approve the Traffic Study and Use Permit No. 3104 was voted on which MOTION CARRIED. A. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT Accept the Environmental Document with the findings listed below: Findings: 1. That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and that their contents have been considered in the de- cisions on this project. F1 5 t COMMISSIONERS September 6, 1984 m o x c rt m 0m City of Newport Beach MINUTES INDEX 2. That based on the information contained in the . Negative Declaration, the project incorporates sufficient mitigation measures to reduce poten- tially significant environmental effects, and that the project will not result in significant en- vironmental impacts. B. TRAFFIC STUDY Approve the Traffic Study with the findings listed below: Findings: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact•of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the proj- ect -generated traffic will be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of the. critical intersections, but will add not to an unsatisfac- tory level of traffic service at any critical intersection, which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of less then .90. C. USE PERMIT No. 3104 Approve Use Permit No. 3104 with the findings and subject to the conditions listed below: FINDINGS 1. That the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and the Local Coastal Program, Land Use Plan, and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. That the establishment of the use will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and improve- ments in the neighborhood or the general welfare 7 ROLL CALL September 6, 1984 MINUTES m n x � � c m m City of Newport Beach of the City, and further that the proposed project in terms of use, height, building floor area and setbacks is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of the Municipal Code. 3. Adequate off-street parking and related vehicular circulation are being provided in conjunction with the proposed development. 4. The development will provide for both public physical and visual access to the bay. 5. That the height of the structure is consistent with the proposed use and will not. adve;sely affect any public view. 6. That the project is generally consistent with the ballot measure approved by the electors' in June, 1982 allowing the lease of North Star Beach for an Aquatic Center. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivi- sion. 8. That the size and use of the Aquatic Center as approved by this Use Permit represents the full. extent of the authority granted to the City pursuant to the approval of Proposition O in 1982. CONDITIONS 1. That development shall be in substantial confor- mance with the approved plot plan, floor plan, and elevations except as noted below. 2. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 3. That a standard use permit'agreement and accompa- nying surety be provided if it is desired to obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 4. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the Traffic Engineer. 10 INDEX PvLhvl Dk J PW ROLL MMISSIONERS September 6, 1984 MINUTES m n x � � c m0 0m City of Newport Beach INDEX 5. That the design of the private drives conform with the City's Private Street Policy (L-4), except as VI% approved by the Public Works Department. The location, width, configuration, and concept of the private drive system shall be subject to further review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer. and / 6. That the intersection of the public street proposed drive be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 25 miles per hour. Slopes, landscaping, walls and other obstructions shall be considered in the sight distance require- ments. Landscaping within the sight distance line shall not exceed twenty-four (24) inches in height. The sight distance requirements may be approximately modified at non -critical locations, subject to approval of the Traffic Engineer. 7. Handicap parking shall be provided to meet code 01 JJJ and shall be marked in a manner acceptable to the Traffic Engineer. 8. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared and approved by the Public Works Department, along / w with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain facilities for the on -site improvements prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. Any modifications or extensions to the existing, storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required shall be the responsibility of the developer. 9. That a legal description of the subject property y�K be prepared and approved by the Planning Depart- ment, Building Department and Public Works Depart- Pam` ment prior to issuance of any grading or building permit. 10. That all proposed signs shall be in conformance j with the provision of Chapter 20.06 of the Newport J,AMV)1�1 Beach Municipal Code and shall be approved by the �� J City Traffic Engineer if located adjacent to the vehicular ingress and egress. 11. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape archi- tect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. Prior to 11 r-nnAAA1SGICINFR; September 6, 1984 MINUTES' m n x � c m o = City of Newport Beach ROLL CALL INDEX occupancy, a licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the approved plan. 12. The landscape plan shall be subject to the review of the Public Works Department, the Parks, Reaches and Recreation Department, and the approval of the Planning Department. 13. The landscape plan shall include a maintenance program which controls the use of fertilizers and pesticides. 14. The landscape plan shall place heavy emphasis on the use of drought -resistant native vegetation, and be irrigated with a system designed to avoid surface runoff and overwatering. 15. That a minimum of 63 parking spaces be provided for the proposed development. These parking spaces shall be secured by. a chain or gate at the entrance on North.Star Lane in accordance with the operating hours of the Aquatic Center. 16. That all employees shall park their vehicles on -site. 17. If a parking area for the storage of boat trailers is provided, this parking shall be in addition to the 63 parking spaces required by the project. 18. That the maximum height of the building not exceed 20 feet. 19. That the specific use and function of the facility be subject to further review and approval of the City as part of the ground lease and required Facilities Management Plan. 20. The hours of operation will be limited to 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily, and that no outdoor programs will be offered after the hour of 7:00 p.m. only advanced training activities are permitted between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. 21. That no new boat fabrication will occur on -site it S 6f swe t+velf LZ' 12 ROLL September 6, 1984 MINUTES m o � � � c o m of ' Newport Beach .City INDEX 22. Trailering of boats to or from the site shall occur only between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00' Y� p.m. 23. No overnight accommodations will be provided LM4e r / on -site, other than the coordinator apartment. noorg)" Ok Y 24. The on -site coordinator staff shall be subject to the approval of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation ' n'l Department. A member of the on -site coordinator Lefe/ staff shall be on the premises at all times. The Leda-.ks coordinator shall have the authority to restrict cfe1e�� use of the facility to individuals with motor (�_1 � vehicles which are in conformance with the Motor vehicle Code. 25. The weight training facilities will be used by L646 ✓ aquatic program participants, and will not be available for independent weight training pro- grams. 26. Outdoor boat storage shall be limited to seasonal LeAk—/ storage of outrigger canoes. 27. Parking lot lighting shall be designed in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to Plav�v� 'A , minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared by a licensed Electrical Engineer; with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion this requirement has been met. 28. That the parking Tot shall be secured by gates as shown on the approved site plan. The gates shall be locked.no later than 10:30 p.m. 29. The parking lot lighting shall be turned off no later than 10:30 p.m. on any day, and timing LeAcy devices shall be installed and maintained to ensure that the lights are turned of at 10:30 p.m. 30. No outdoor public address system shall be L-ejW permitted. 31. Restrooms shall be made available to members of q ��� aJ the general public during the center's hours of I�-<•.4 operation. 13 September 6, 1984 MINUTES u ROLL of Newport Beach 32. This use permit shall expire unless exercised within 36 months from the date of approval. 33. Construction of the project may be phased so long D K as no part of the facility is constructed prior to the boat storage facility., 34. That the Planning Commission may add/or modify conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend to the City Council the revocation of k this use permit, upon a determination that the a operation which is the subject of this use permit the health, causes injury, or is detrimental to or welfare safety, peace, morals, comfort, general of the community. 35. Construction of the bulkhead is subject to ap- G1 proval of a Harbor Permit, and is also subject to W the approval of the County of orange, Harbor, Beaches and Parks Department. 36. That an engineering study be prepared -to determine the appropriate design for the bay frontage. Bulkheads, rock revetments, or other facilities to recommended by the study shall be constructed OIL adequately protect the onsite improvements. Newport Aquatic Center shall agree to construct, maintain, and repair the bayside facilities. The City or other public agencies shall have no responsibility to provide repairs to facilities flooded or damaged by erosion from,the bay and adjacent drainage course, or to otherwise protect the improvements constructed on the site. 37. The project shall comply with the Uniform Building �1�� Code and all local Amendments, and the City's seismic design standards. 38. The project shall comply with the• State regu- J lations for the handicapped. 39. Construction shall meet the requirements of Title 19 and 24 of the C.A.C. . 40. Access to the service road circling the aquatic f71� t complex shall be controlled by the means of a gate or other features to prevent use by the general public. 14 COMMISSIONERS September 6, 1984 MINUTES m o � . �m m q m City of Newport Beach ROLL CALLMMMM� INDEXEMONVAMMUM 41. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a P)a� ES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPD) / Permit shall be obtained from the Santa Ana �Y" Regional Water Quality Control Board if any J discharges to the Bay are anticipated either during construction or subsequent operation of the facility. 42. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, an Army 1 Corps of Engineers Permit shall be obtained to allow construction of the proposed bulkhead and docking facilities. 43. Residents should be provided with a point of �� contact with the Newport Aquatic Center manage- ment, to handle complaints of noisy vehicles in the parking lot or on local streets. be Pjan n� 44. All mechanical equipment and trash areas shall O�L screened from public streets, alleys, or adjoining properties. Pim V1 11 45. Exterior lighting shall be approved by the Plan- ning Department. 46. Development of the site may be subject to a C? grading permit to be approved by the Building and, �(�G Planning Department. (-A7 47. A grading plan will include a complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage -"facilities, to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, J YYfG(4lgQJ and other water pollutants. 48. The grading permit will include a description of to the site, and �YVLA1V haul routes, access points watering and sweeping programs designed to mini- J mize impacts of grading and haul operations. 49. An erosion, siltation, and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to approval by the Building Department and a copy will be forwarded to the California Regional water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. Grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer and based on recommendations of a soils engineer and an engi- neering geologist subsequent to completion of a 15 1 September 6, 1984 m City of Newport Beach MINUTES ROT I CAI I I I I I I I 1 I ( INDEX comprehensive soils and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent reproduction copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans on standard -size sheets shall be furnished to the Building Depart- ment. 51. The Fire Department shall review design plans to ensure adequate access and emergency exists. 52. The provision of adequate fire flow shall be reviewed by the Fire Department. 53. Structures shall be equipped with fire suppression systems as required by Code. 54. Final design of the project shall provide for the incorporation of water -saving devices for lavatories and other water -using facilities. 55. All onsite drainage shall be approved by the City Public Works Department. 56. A weekly cleanup program around the project site shall be conducted on a regular basis. During construction, basins or other devices shall be installed to prevent waste from entering Newport Bay. 57. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a comprehensive soils and foundation study will be prepared and approved by the Planning and Building Departments of the City of Newport Beach. 58. Should any archaeological resources be uncovered during excavation/construction, a qualified archaeologist or paleontologist shall evaluate the site prior to completion of construction activ- ities, and all work on the site shall be done in accordance with the City Council Policies and K-5 and K-6. 59. Any mechanical equipment and emergency power generators shall be screened from view, and noise associated with said structures shall be sound attenuated so as not to exceed 55 dBA at the property lines. The latter shall be based upon the recommendations of the qualified acoustical engineer and approved by the Building Department. Piyle PivC Le,4k/' G 16 m o x � S m C t� Yl ij F September 6, 1984 71 Beach MINUTES 60. All construction activities will be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through L�F^ Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday. 61. Use of the site shall be limited to a maximum of 250 persons per day. �1 62. The Dover Shores Community Association shall be allowed to elect a representative to the Aquatic Center Board of Directors. 63. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant limiting use of -the facility to that allowed by the terms of the lease as executed by City Council. r at 9:30 p.m. 6ovnw 5yo Use P'&Znit No. 3108 (Continued Public Hearing) Item No.2 RequestVM-1 e establishment of a retail art Use Permit galleryperty located in the M-1 District. No. 3108 LOCATIOand 7, Block 328, Lancaster's on, located Approved 12 Layfayette Avenue, -on the Condition - side of Layfayette Avenue, ally n 9th Street and 30th Street, in y Vi age.ZONE: APPLICANT: Paul Blain Henrie Newport Beach OWNER: Loma Linda UniversityNLoma Linda Mr. William Laycock, Current Planning A inistrator, advised that the Planning Staff has recomm ded that the following two conditions be added if the lanning Commission desires to approve this Use rmit. Condition No. 5: "That the second floor areas . all only be used by the artist or the gallery manager fo a studio, office, or storage purposes", and Condition No. 17 CI 6 Y OF MEW900FRT BEAC arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission August 7, 1984 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX. Ex-Officio Member Present: Ronald A. Whitley, Director Staff Present: Jack Brooks, Park and Street 7' Tree Supt. Tom Line, Recreation Supt. Dottie Flohr, Secretary I. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Item nl Call to Order The meeting of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission was called to order at 7:05 P.M. �. Item r2 Roll Call Roll call was taken. Commissioners Capretz, Cohen, de Boom, Hopkins, King, Springer and Wolfe were present. Motion x Item n3 Approval o Seconded x Minutes Ayes x x x x x Chair Cohen amended the minutes of the July 10, 1984 meeting to read that Cohen, not King, will serve on the Budget Committee, along with Commissioners de Boom and Wolfe. Motion was made by de Boom and seconded by Capretz to approve the amended minutes. Unanimous. Motion x Item i-4 Adoption c Seconded x Agenda Ayes x x x x x 'The agenda was adopted as presented. II. ACTION ITEMS Motion x Item #5 - Review of Newport Aquatic Center Proposal for Review of North Star Beach Seconded x Newport Ayes x x x x x Ron Whitley reviewed the background concerning the proposed Aquatic .Center Newport Aquatic Center which was conceived two years ago. Proposal Following numerous preliminary meetings, the proposal was brought to the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission for approval in February, 1982 and then to the City Council with the idea of having a non-profit organization build a facility on public land. Since North Star Beach is desig- nated Tidelands and, as such, is under State jurisdiction, action was taken to place the issue on the ballot in November, 1982. It was passed by the electorate by a 2-1 margin. A tentative ground lease was prepared and provided 1 to the Commission for their review. I CITY OF NIEWPOR T B'EACH arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission Page 2 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX The Newport Aquatics Center needs to obtain a Use Permit from the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission reviewed their request and sent it to the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission with the idea in mind that this Commission and staff might have comments regarding the pro- posed programs at the facility. The environmental issue is the Planning Commission's responsibility. The applicant and the Dover Shores Homeowners Association were present at this meeting to give their input on the issue. The President of the Mariners Homeowners Association• called Mr. Whitley and told him they wished to give a nega- tive declaration since they would not be represented this evening. In addition, Pat Temple from the Planning Depart- ment was present to answer any questions. Pat Temple addressed the Commission and answered questions concerning building height, etc. Ron Whitley mentioned that until the building is completed, staff will not know what the needs -by the Parks,'Beaches and Recreation Depart- ment will be. He added that it was never staff's intention to have activities there that are not aquatic related. Chair Cohen opened the meeting to public testimony. Fred Talarico, 359 San Miguel, who represents the Newport Aquatics Center, addressed the Commission. He said they found North Star Beach to be the ideal site for human power craft and that the non=profit corporation was estab- lished to provide a facility on the subject site. Mr. Talarico reviewed some of the background and noted that in June of this year they applied for a Use Permit. The PlanningCommission asked them to first meet with the Dover Shores and Mariners Homeowners Associations and the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission. They met with both Boards on August 6 and hope to present to the Planning Commission on August 23 a proposal comfortable for all groups. They hope to have the rest of the permits approved by November, 1984 so the facility can open by July 4, 1985. Mr. Talarico also said they hope to be at this site a long time and be a good neighbor. Since they are meeting re- sistance from the homeowner groups concerning traffic congestion, they are proposing to reduce the facility from 65,000 s.f. to 20,000 s.f. which will accommodate 250 individuals on a peak day, rather than the original 850. Mr. Talarico passed out a Building Facility Summary for information purposes. 7 CITtQ ern NEWPOR T BEACH Parks,, Beaches & Recreation Commission Page 3 City Council Chambers 7 p,m, Bill Whitford, 406 Snug Harbor, addressed the Commission. He reported the concept started by his paddling in the area and noting there was no place to store human power craft. They want the site and facility to be compatible to the area and also to help the youth and handicapped. Mr. Whitford also explained the hours of use for advanced and youth sports. The building will be built at no cost to the taxpayers, but will be open to the public for on -going programs. Mr. Fred Talarico, 359 San Miguel, addressed the Commission again and answered questions concerning the 25 year -.lease. They will raise the money to build the facility and will also serve as instructors. He emphasized again that they want to have a good facility with quality programs in addi- tion to being a good neighbor. Capretz pointed out that the concept itself has been endorse by the people and -the Commission. What is required is some thing compatible with the needs of the people and the Aquatics Center. Ron Whitley said he felt the reduced 20,000 s.f. is adequate in size to offer programs and store boats. He pointed out that the facility can always be expanded should the need arise. He also mentioned that the major activities will be in the water, rather than in the facility itself. Mr. Cliff Jordan, 1212 Santiago, addressed the Commission. He said he felt North Star Beach is not an appropriate area due to the potential problems which will most likely be encountered. He felt that due to the steep hills in the residential area that traffic will present a hazard in addition to the loud radios early in the morning which will disturb their privacy. He also does not like the idea that public access will be through their private residential area. He stated he does not object to the concept itself, but feels the facility should be located in a non-residentia area. Patricia Voss, 1219 Santiago, addressed the Commission and expressed her concern that the location would pose too many traffic hazards and burdens. Peter Drummond, 1706 Antigua Way, who is President of the Dover Shores Homeowners Association, addressed the Commission. He said the original functions and size of the facility have changed and that he thought this was to be a rowing facility only. Due to the change in configuration, INDEX 1(7% CITY OF NEEWPOR i BEACH N Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission -o Page 4 City Council Chambers 7 (i C� Y p.m. INDEX he feels it should be located elsewhere to relieve the potential traffic burden. He said the scaling down to 20,000 s.f. is more favorable, however, he would like to get more community response which he feels is already 100% negative. Mr. Ed Benson, 1028 Westwind Way and a member of the Dover Shores Board, addressed the Commission. He gave a brief background of the area and the impaction the proposed facility would have on the site. He expressed his concern regarding traffic and noise problems and felt that the facility should be located elsewhere. He also stated he wasn't aware of the size and number of functions programmed when he first voted. He said he thought it was going to be a rowing facility and not a physical fitness center. He said he is also concerned about; the 65' boats getting into the area. He feels the whole matter should again be reviewed. Upon the close of public testimony, there was discussion by the Commission. Hopkins suggested reinstating con- ceptual approval. Cohen suggested the applicant redesign both the latest presentation which limits the size of the facility and those areas which are involved with the human power boating, as well as eliminating those areas that are duplicated the i_.e.,_Nautilus,.etc. The _by_ _community _,_ redesign should then be presented to the Planning Commission) and, if approved, staff would recommend programs the City could introduce. King felt the facility should not be limited to rowing. Capretz felt Newport Beach Aquatics should give more thought on how to decrease traffic and how to combat the negatives about which Dover Shores is concerned. He also suggested they include the homeowner associations and staff in any J future planning. He suggested the Commission communicate back to the Planning Commission that since it is our under- standing the applicant is. considering a decrease in the facility plan and that the decrease is to be reviewed by the homeowner associations, the Commission is not in a position to make a decision until after the applicant has submitted the new plans. When re -presented, the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission will review it. King motioned the Commission be on record as favoring the concept, and that we will support the concept under the right conditions and building size and when the neighborhoo is satisfied with their concerns. Seconded by Capretz. �� Unanimous.