Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1 BIG CANYON DR_BIG CANYON COUNTRY CLUB1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 *NEW FILE* 1 Big Canyon Dr CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION BIG CANYON COUNTRY CLUB PROJECT POND FILL, STORM DRAIN & SEWER TRUNK LINE Response to Project Issues/Questions Presented to City per Public Review of Draft CEQA Document Prepared for: City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92658-8915 Prepared by: Hodge & Associates Ms. Cheryle L. Hodge 24040 Camino del Avion, #A247 Monarch Beach, California 92629 October 2001 Introduction This document has been prepared for City staff use in evaluating public questions/issues raised and presented in writing to the City of Newport Beach during the public review period on the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Big Canyon Country Club Project. The comment letters are on file with the City of Newport Beach, Planning Department. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the City of Newport Beach is under no obligation to respond to comments received on the IS/MND. Although there is no duty to respond to such comments, the City of Newport Beach and the project applicant, Big Canyon Country Club have caused this document to be prepared and has done so voluntarily in order to consider and evaluate project questions and/or comments presented to the City. This document has been prepared to focus on the public questions/issues pertaining to the project for several particular topical areas such as the City's compliance with CEQA procedures, biological resources, hydrology/drainage, the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer, and the operation and use of the golf course. The City of Newport Beach will consider the environmental documentation, together with any comments received, prior to the adoption of the CEQA document (i.e. Mitigated Negative Declaration). The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21082.2 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064 clearly state that significant effect is based on substantial evidence, not public controversy or speculation. The existence of public controversy over the environmental effects of a project do not require preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR) if there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the lead agency that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. Section 15064(5) of the CEQA Guidelines identifies that argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative, or evidence that is clearly inaccurate or erroneous, or evidence that is not credible, shall not constitute substantial evidence. If there is no substantial evidence a project may have a significant effect on the environment or the initial study identifies potential significant impacts, but provides for project revisions and/or mitigation that make such effects insignificant, a public agency must adopt a negative declaration to such effect and, as a result no EIR is required. The term "significant impact" as used in environmental analyses, is a statutory term defined in per the CEQA. The statute defines a "significant effect on the environment" as a "substantial, or potentially substantially, adverse change in the environment." California Public Resources Code Section 20168. The written public comments submitted to the City of Newport Beach do not provide substantial evidence that a significant effect will occur as a result of the project. The comment letters do convey opinions, argument, and raise project questions and potential speculation that may be based on lack of information and/or incorrect facts. Additionally, the comments (or issues raised) by "professional experts" may also be different than those of the Lead Agency if based upon different facts. This does not necessarily constitute a disagreement 2 E Ll among experts. The IS/MND contains substantial evidence to support all of the conclusions presented herein. That is not to say that there will be potential disagreements with these conclusions. Both the CEQA Guidelines and case law clearly provide standards for treating disagreement with environmental determinations. Compliance with CEOA Procedures 1. Comment Questions and/or comments have been submitted to the City that question whether the project has complied with CEQA procedures including public noticing of the project, requirement of City to consider previous written comments dated July 10, 2000 submitted by EIS, and a request that an EIR be prepared. 1. Response The project has complied with CEQA requirements pertaining to Mitigated Negative Declarations. On March 5, 2001 a "Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was filed and posted with County Clerks office and City in regards to the proposed MND and it's 30-day public review period. The public notice was also posted at 3 locations including at the pond near the clubhouse, at the pond near the driving range, and at the entry of the Country Club outside of the gated entrance near the intersection of Big Canyon Drive and San Joaquin Hills Road. Photos of the posted notices were taken. Additionally, on March 4, 2001 15 copies of the complete MND and appendix were submitted to the State Clearinghouse as well as U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USCOE), California Department of Fish & Game (CDFDG), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Caltrans, and the Coastal Commission (although site is not located in coastal zone). Consultation with regulatory agencies (i.e. CDFG & USCOE) have also occurred and is on file at the City. In compliance with State law and City procedures, the City has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental compliance for the proposed project. Therefore, the City will not cause to be prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). In compliance with Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Initial Study checklist form and explanation discussion format meets the requirements of the CEQA. Section 15063(d)(3) require that the entries on the Initial Study checklist identifying environmental effects are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries. An Initial Study may rely upon expert opinion supported by facts, technical studies or other substantial evidence to document its findings. An Initial Study is not intended nor required to include a level of detail which would provided in an EIR (Leonoff v. Monterey County Board of Supervisors (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1337). The IS/MND is not intended to be a lengthy detailed document. 3 Sewer Transmission Pipeline 1. Comment Since the City of Newport Beach does not have any jurisdiction or authority in regards to the sewer trunk line, what is Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) role in regards to the project, specifically the replacement of the sewer trunk line? Will OCSD be issuing a grading permit for replacement of the sewer trunk line? Approving CEQA compliance? 1. Response OCSD has indicated to the City that it's their intent to hire Big Canyon Country Club's Consultant, Walden & Associates, through a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) between Waldon & OCSD to complete the design to replace a portion of OCSD's Big Canyon Trunk Sewer. The design will include obtaining any permits required to replace the sewer. OCSD typically does not obtain grading permits because OCSD constructs sewers in the public right of way, not private property. In this case, OCSD owns a public right of way easement through the Big Canyon Country Club (Golf Course). If a new alignment is required to avoid problems with the new storm drains, then OCSD assumes that the Big Canyon Country Club will grant OCSD a new easement. Also, OCSD expects that if the City of Newport Beach requires a grading permit for the new storm drains on private property owned by the Big Canyon Country Club, then the application for that permit would include grading provisions for any OCSD sewer. OCSD's Consultant will verify that the proper CEQA documentation/procedures have been performed in relation to OCSD's project. Also, in compliance with the CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the OCSD prepared and processed an EIR for the Strategic Plan that was certified by OCSD on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. 2. Comment Are the sewer leaks in the project area and/or from the 1,100' segment to be replaced or the 7,500' entire length to be replaced per the strategic plan? 2. Response The OCSD has indicated to the City of Newport Beach that they do not have evidence of sewer leaks (i.e. exfiltration) in the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer including the 1,100' segment to be replaced. The OCSD conducted a closed circuit television (CCTV) inspection on the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer on December 9 and 10, 1999. The inspection revealed cracks, mineral deposits, sags, and infiltration. Areas where there is infiltration (the groundwater elevation is above the sewer pipe) will not have exfiltration due to the pressure of the groundwater forcing its way into the pipe. The Big Canyon Trunk Sewer is a gravity sewer that is not under pressure; therefore there is no pressure that would push the sewage out of the pipe. The CCTV inspection did not reveal that that the sewer is leaking. Groundwater infiltration under pressure forces its way into the pipe, not out of the pipe. The project will replace a portion of the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer in conjunction with the area affected by the Big Canyon Pond Filling Project. The Big Canyon Trunk Sewer is scheduled to be rehabilitated, in the Strategic Plan, by 2009. The rehabilitation will be designed to correct any groundwater infiltration problems into OCSD's sewer. 3. Comment Is any untreated sewage being leaked (or discharged) to the groundwater beneath the Big Canyon Country Club & Golf Course? 3. Response The OCSD has indicated that there is no untreated sewage being leaked or discharged from OCSD's Big Canyon Trunk Sewer. Also see response to #2 above. 4. Comment What is the groundwater level within the project area (pond & sewer trunkline)? 4. Response OCSD will investigate and determine the groundwater level during design. However, the OCSD have indicated that is estimated that the groundwater level is at a depth of approximately 10' below the surface. The groundwater level is above the existing Big Canyon Trunk Sewer. Additionally, in 1989, Irvine Soils Engineering, Inc. conducted field explorations within the Big Canyon Country Club golf course (this report is on file at the City of Newport Beach). The field explorations included subsurface investigation by drilling borings to depths of approximately 41.5' to 56.5' below the existing grade. Ground water was encountered at depths of 20' to 25'. 5. Comment Is any remedial action to remove fecal or other materials from the area of the OCSD pipeline been previously done or now needed? 5. Response There are no fecal materials in the area of the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer caused by OCSD's sewer pipe. Fecal or other materials, including the water, cannot and do not exfiltrate out of the pipe in the Big Canyon area due to the constant hydraulic conditions of groundwater under pressure. Also see response to #2 above. 6. Comment What is the timing/schedule for replacement of the remaining 7,500' length of sewer trunkline? 6. Response Rehabilitation of the remaining Big Canyon Trunk Sewer is scheduled to be completed prior to 2009. • 7. Comment What are the current and projected flow amounts in the sewer pipeline and is there appropriate capacity to determine accurately size the sewer line? 7. Response The current flow volume, projected flow volume, and capacity questions will be analyzed in the design phase. The OCSD Strategic Plan identifies that the 2020 peak wet weather flow is 2.43 MGD (the City's draft Recirculated IS/IVM also states this on page 25). 8. Comment Is the sewer pipeline project identified per the City's or OCSD's CIP (Capital Improvement Program)? 8. Response Big Canyon Offsite Sewer Rehabilitation is included in OCSD's Capital Improvement Program and OCSD's Strategic Plan adopted in October 1999. Also, in compliance with the CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the OCSD prepared and processed an EIR for the Strategic Plan that was certified by OCSD on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. HydrologylDrainage 1. Comment The pipe system, as proposed, would only carry the flow that would result from a storm with about a 5-year frequency. 1. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. Per the April 2001 report, the drainage conveyance facilities are generally designed for 10-25 years flows based on hydrology criteria that existed at the time, with habitable structures protected against 100-year flows. Additionally, Walden & Associates (Civil Engineering firm) submitted to the City a precise grading plan for the pond fill and drainage improvements showing the existing drainage patterns for flow into this area. The plan identifies the projected overflow of the storm drain pipes due to downstream pipe clogging or to an event approximating an El Nino storm flow. Walden & Associates have indicated that the project's design can accommodate a projected overflow (as significant as the El Nino event). Also, see response to #2 below. 2. Comment By removing the existing pond, any peak -flow reduction associated with that lake will be eliminated, thus reducing the frequency storm that the existing drains can handle. 2. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. The existing pond outlet is a headwall/weir structure with a four -foot difference between top of weir and top of headwall with the ability to overflow downstream. Two separate drainage areas contribute to the pond with approximately 54% from the east and 46% from the southeast. Also see response to #3 below. 3. Comment The proposed undersized drainage system will cause the storm flows to back up, resulting in the formation of lake upstream from the proposed pipes. 3. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. The project will replicate the existing ponding and conveyance system as follows: • The southeast drainage, 46% of the total flow, can be ponded adjacent to the 18' green in the existing inlet sump to a depth of approximately 7 feet. • The east drainage, 54% of the total flow, can be ponded at a headwall/weir inlet structure with a 5-foot differential between top of weir and top of headwall and the ability to overflow downstream. The overflow, should it occur, will be conducted downstream in a swale designed to accommodate the overflow and to protect any improvements or slopes adjacent to the swale. The maximum depth of any flow in this swale should be less than three feet. Walden & Associates (Civil Engineering firm) have submitted to the City a precise grading plan for the pond fill and drainage improvements showing the existing drainage patterns for flow into this area. Also, noted in Walden & Associates projected overflow of the storm drain pipes due to downstream pipe clogging or to an event approximating an El Nino storm flow. This overflow should be accommodated within the Projected Overflow area to a depth of 2' to 3' with no disturbances to existing structures and no hillside deterioration. Walden & Associates has also submitted to the City of Newport Beach a topographic map showing current topographic conditions and the existing drainage pattern. Also noted is the area of inundation, as best determined by Walden & Associates, due to overflow of the pond outlet culverts approximating the El Nino storm flow. 4. Comment The undersized drainage system will create conditions resulting in the reduction of stability of the existing slopes along the stream upstream of the proposed construction. 4. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. See response to #3 above. The precise grading plan and topographic map submitted by Walden & Associates indicate that the drainage design of the proposed project will not result in any reduction of stability of the existing slopes along the stream upstream of the proposed construction. fri n U Biological Resources 1. Comment The biological assessment appears to have been conducted over a year ago and therefore now may be considered unreliable and cannot be used as a factual basis to assess the project's impact. 1. Response The regulatory agencies (i.e. US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and California Department of Fish & Game (CDFG)) have reviewed the biological studies and have also conducted site inspections in addition to site assessments conducted by the biological resource consultant. The project applicant has commenced permit applications with these agencies in compliance with regulatory requirements including biological assessment and survey protocols. The applicant must obtain approval from these regulatory agencies prior to the City's issuance of a grading permit for the project. 2. Comment The need for updated and expanded field surveys is highlighted by the Lead Agency's recognition that "42 sensitive or special status species of animals and 21 sensitive or special status species of plants that occur with the general regional of the proposed project" could potentially exist on the project site. Since those species are never identified, it's not possible to independently determine the potential presence of these unspecified species on or near the project site. If a "database search" was conducted, why was that information not included in technical appendix of the Revised Initial Study? Specifically what sensitive or specials status species were identified in that search? Are there any City, CDFG, or USFWS policies and/or procedures with regard to the currency of biological assessments? After what time period should a biological survey be updated to ensure that it accurately reflects current conditions and from what source is that determination derived? 2. Response The CEQA documentation includes a complete biological resources assessment. As stated previously the site is located within an existing private golf course. Existing residential development and golf course surround the site The Biological Resources study (page 2 and 5) identifies that a literature review included the California Natural Diversity Database and the California Native Plant Society's Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. Therefore, the source is cited that contains the listing of the sensitive or special status animal and plant species that occur in the general region of the project. The cited sources are available to the public. The comment incorrectly characterizes that the biological assessment study (page 4) identifies that these potential sensitive or special status species could potentially exist on the project site. Page 4 of the biological study does not state that these species could potentially exist on the project site but rather states that the species "occur within the general region of the proposed project". In fact, the biology study goes on to clearly state that because of the lack of suitable habitat in the already existing development (a golf n course), it not expected that any of these specials plants or animals are present at the proposed project site. 3. Comment The CDFG correspondence submitted to the City (dated June 26, 2000) indicates that the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and appendix containing the biological assessment is inadequate per CDFG. 3. Response The mitigation measures recommended for potential biological resource impacts are based on a professional expert biological assessment of the site. The mitigation measures are drafted in manner to ensure compliance, implementation, and verification. The habitat mitigation plan for wetlands is developed in consultation with the regulatory agencies that have jurisdiction over such resources. The mitigation must comply with state and federal laws. The project can't proceed forward until the City receives evidence identifying that the requirements of the regulatory agencies have been met. The project will comply with the legal requirements pertaining to the breeding season. The project applicant has applied for a CDFG Agreement and issuance of the Agreement is pending the City's completion of the CEQA compliance. As with any project subject to CDFG regulations and compliance, the CDFG reserves the right to require additional environmental documentation and/or adopt the subject CEQA document (IS/MND) for use in the consideration and issuance of a CDFG Agreement. As stated previously, the City will not issue a grading permit for the proposed project until required regulatory agency permits/agreements are obtained and evidence of said compliance is provided to the City. Golf Course Use 1. Comment Comments submitted to the City raise issues/questions pertaining to the expanded use of the golf course and impacts associated with the use of the golf course, including the putting green, expanded depth of the driving range, potential increase in club membership. 1. Response The proposed project is a private initiated project. The applicant is the Big Canyon Country Club. The project requires a grading permit from the City of Newport Beach. Therefore, the grading permit is subject to review, and approval or denial from the City Building Official. In compliance with State law and City procedures, the subject grading permit request and associated CEQA documentation does not require public hearings and/or meetings be held to consider the project. Additionally, the project (grading permit/CEQA documentation) will not be subject to City Planning Commission review and/or City Council review. The City has conducted a thorough environmental review of the proposed grading permit request. A grading permit is required for the grading activities associated with the project. 9 0 In addition to the City grading permit, the applicant must obtain approval of other various permits from numerous agencies prior to the commencement of grading/construction activities. For example the project will require review and approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), California Department of Fish & Game (CDFG), the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the water district. Without approval from these governmental entities that project will not be allowed to proceed. The CEQA document (IS/MND) was provided to these agencies for review and comment and no unavoidable adverse significant impacts were identified by these agencies. The City Planning Department has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate CEQA determination for the proposed project (grading permit request). The IS/MND disclosed information that was provided to the City by the project applicant that indicated that pond site (once filled) would potentially be utilized as a putting green area. Additional golf course improvements identified included relocation of the golf cart paths near the pond and expanding the depth of the driving range. The putting green area, increase depth of the driving range, relocation of golf cart paths etc. are allowable uses in compliance with the Big Canyon Country Club Planned Community. The CEQA documentation disclosed these potential uses for informational purposes only. These uses are permitted uses and do not require any discretionary permit approval beyond that previously approved in conjunction with the original Planned Community Regulations and development of the golf course. Therefore, the project activities that are the subject of review and analyses of the CEQA document is the proposed grading permit only. Comments submitted to the City make reference to the expansion of the golf course and impacts associated with potential increase in golf course country club memberships. The Big Canyon Country Club membership is subject to the rules and regulations set forth in their By -Laws. Potential golf course uses of the pond area are disclosed since the project applicant provided this information to the City, however, these uses are allowed and permitted within the existing golf course property boundaries. Additionally, the project applicant indicated that algae have been a problem at the pond. The project applicant is under no obligation to provide alternative solutions for the possible algae problem. The applicant has requested a grading permit for the purposes of filling the pond and constructing associated drainage improvements. Public comments submitted to the City continue emphasis an issue with the use of the site as a putting green area and the modification of the driving range. These uses are permitted allowable uses and are not subject to the subject permit and the associated CEQA document prepared for the proposed grading permit. Although, the City appreciates the concerns expressed in regards to these potential golf course uses, these uses are not subject to the grading permit. Therefore, the project is not an expansion of the existing golf course. No. Mitigab During constructio, proponent (Big G Orange County Sm shall ensure that th complied with (construction) air g with the project: a by regular watering measures to meet Management Distri (Fugitive Dust); b, engines in proper t scheduling construc project -related emir: 2 During constructioi proponent (Big Ck OCSD) shall ensm comply with SCAQA to reduce odors fron No. Mitigation Measures Implementation Method of Timing of Responsible Verification Action Verification Verification Person Date 3 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Condition ofapproval Plan Check Prior to and Planning & project proponent (Big Canyon County Club) during Building shall provide documentation (Le. issued construction Departments regulatory permits) to the Planning activities Department, indicating that all required permits/agreements have been obtained from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and California Department of Fish& Game. The total of 0.64 acres of riparian vegetation shall be mitigated at a "no net loss" minimum ratio. 4 Prior to the start of construction activities Condition of Approval Plan Check Prior to Planning (within 3 to 7 days of disturbance), the issuance ofa Department project proponent (Big Canyon Country building Club) shall cause to be conducted a pre- permit. construction survey of the site for nesting migratory bird species by a qualified biologist. If nesting birds are found, the disturbance of the nesting area shall be delayed until after the young have left the nest. 5 Prior to the completion of construction, the Condition of Approval Field During Building project proponent (Big Canyon Country Inspection construction Department Club) in consultation with a gual fed activities biologist shall relocate the trees and vegetation (i.e. cattails and bulrushes) that provide roosting sites for the black -crowned night -heron to other ponds on the golf course. • No. Mitigation Measures Implementation Method of Timing of Responsible Verification Action Verification Verification Person Date 6 During construction activities, the project Condition of Approval - Plan Check & During Planning proponent (Big Canyon Country Club & Field construction Dept. &- OCSD) will comply with the erosion and Inspection activities Building siltation control measures of the City's grading Dept. ordinance and all applicable local and State building codes and seismic design guidelines, including the City Excavation and Grading Code (NBMCSection 15.10). 7 permit, Prior to the issuance of a grading p, the Condition afApproval Plan Check Prior to the Planning project proponent (Big Canyon Country Club) issuance of Dept. & shall submit a geotechnical investigation that grading Building includes compaction criteria and soil permit Dept. specifications to the Planning and Building De artment for review and a roval. 8 The project proponent (Big Canyon Country Condition of Approval Plan Check & During Public Works Club & OCSD) shall comply with the Field construction Dept. requirements of the National Pollutant Inspection activities Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and shall be subject to the approval of the Public Works Department to determine compliance. 9 The project proponent (Big Canyon Country Condition of Approval Field During Building Club & OCSD) will comply with the Inspection construction Dept. provisions of the City of Newport Beach activities General Plan Noise Element and the Municipal Code pertaining to noise restrictions. During construction activities, the hours of construction and excavation work are allowed from 7:00 a.m. to 6.30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and not at any time on Sundays and holidays. • • No. Mitigation Measures Implementation Action Method of Verification Timine of Verification Responsible Person Verification Date 10 Prior to the start of construction activities, the Condition ofApproval Plan Check Prior to the Planning project proponent (Big Canyon Country Club) — start of Dept. & shall submit to the Planning Department & construction Building Building Department for review and approval activities Dept. a construction traffic control plan which includes the haul route, truck hauling operations, construction traffic flagmen, and construction warning/directional signage within the golf course property and if needed for access to the golf course. 11 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Condition ofApproval Plan Check & Prior to the Planning project proponent (Big Canyon Country Field start of Dept. & Club) shall coordinate with utility and Inspection construction Building service organizations regarding any activities Dept. construction activities to ensure existing facilities are protected and any necessary expansion or relocation of facilities are planned and scheduled in consultation with the appropriate public agencies. City of Newport Beach Public Works Department and Utilities Department review is also required. • Sent By: BIG CANYON#CC; 949 7209338; Sep-17.01 13:36; Page 2 '• •. e' •.. •:ps:•. .,-- ;,;:••SATE." _, srrrr,wArsin, 47,f (7 IOU • r-.ti\; YQ' BW! Inind .l 51J� San Jd pin 1 T' .�if;8M7 0:S del Mar= t Arch .r BW Canyon .r'c=•• o\aoe``tl` . ,`; ', M $ch ,<'; n / `�e; iMauso durti • J : x'•� "�-wo v+(.; rn 1,n `• 11Y•- ..may _. ..\ SP/84 W�v N.r• �. <�6Tx _ ny'q• <:r3 ✓' .`- NEWPORT BEACH y,.� .�y�' yew •v..n, - ;" - I � ._—, ''� •, . All��i�gr�i si <%'f,• 111 < •re: — — ':� ! , —. x' -a. i+M Pelican719 yOxa%�.1y�'�-°1n1,�yya°i /��'sa�s..' — - `_ HJ.II�•. 1, •n _ ..•,.: .:,�ry♦�9�Y: /,,. �-.{,q�r , ,, .5 �' ... •_„N,;'l'.. � „a'r" - ',i:v �•.a6 FdQ ib.✓�(1 f . • �y4Aa3r�M��q`'' ('-., _ �_ `-,. • . :i •`r' -�'h C „ ra ,+•4�c•`."i, ar �/4oe`'� ' ram\\ .-'r:: .., o ': ,sa::;+, `:.VMusurd 2 Pelican Point ,:i< SM 70� 0 2000 4000 ADAPTED FROM U.S.G.S. 7.5' LAGUNA FEET PEACH OUADRANGLE(1081) LOCATION MAP; -UK)- f APPROXIMATE SWIMMING EXISTING PROFILE I� POOL LOCATION 2-1-71, M of T PLAN 8-3 j APPROVED FOR f60 GRADING ONLY F W W Z Oaf Z O 130 Get �'•�-„`• Oaf 8-2 R-I �.` Oat W ITil, t Oaf T�. _ _ PROFILE TM Tm $MUIRMAH=SIMPSON T.D:66 T SHEET 7 OF 28 DATE 40-7-88 O 30 60 FEET MOE m rt m m H n Z 1' 0 z r W W LL v m tso o � P N C O > W m W J W W m t08 m v 0 W W J HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SCALE: 1 INCH :30 FEET v m CROSS SECTION 1-1' ......._.. W ' r IRVINE SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. i C S y } r t Sant By: BIG CANYON#CC; , rk, 949 7209338; Sep-17-01 13:39; Fage 5/13 'Phi boirin49 were ':backf illad. Gai at as Tmi At i6' , Y Sent By: BIC CANYCN4CC; 949 720933B; 8ep-17-01 13:42; i Page 7/13 `a7'GM yrwov, Ww� JotiC C'ayw tlwtr�k. a iSANDS oNQAl.TNAm NA4F or CQAIIal 'fRACTOM IS ft[!S tNAN 5'A` f4Nla2 . !'ANDS'.. iR TN WITH Phods NO. 4..3t[r[ ;• SILTS AND MAYS LIQUID LIMIT':la ccaaTNANaQta e ro", saw~ wmvwvO torwic ®r 4»!-Stay. wAnN eNW 4tAe i 17. v, 41Nyy dr Nittelrv. OL {Qri4Me vim* iFtl .r•/4M4 sw[y aNpA N iw aISiDCRy. Mtq reNa, w 4Wr -.4«ae.aa.4+rn iaa iMsy. O %."v .d.la. 4W41k adN4. gLLATiVE DENSITY ,f.OM3I8TENCY--. . NDL 611i" 8 AN ON-PLAST10.41LTS - S/F007 VlW UM&, _ "'0•4 s'LOOM u n= 4 - ♦a ilomm.OlNtlB ' Dtnwrna y�'64M-aa' rut: ntatZ orlR aD MCASTLC 9iP'! STRBNOTNA�.SLOWGFpO'T'` :.. SOfT �_174�112 3.- .'-NANO j-OVER 4 '. "ov" of �i NQ{MLt{ 6F:SLOW# Df /4C FQYND NAMN[R FALLINQ aC-M�NBS TD DRWS A 9 INCR tld. 1 �� `* ['�tgWNf.N 4D.i i+l{TTBPyOO'N [ASTM D-t56a7 x'.ef �y .1,.,� ,,,j i, �. "ti' '' �•,'r� y !"WNCCNFY[!b CONPREiaW[',iiNBNATN Nr TOniteD iF.A# 6!T'ERNP141 iV t.ASONATDkY'. hX �, a tr T[Y41Ni[,Iyt?R APfRb5V4AT50 SV TIIS aTANDARO PFNETRA''[[gN TiBT [ASTN Dw15aj/ FtoCREP PlNETRONETEN TDNVAAIL OR Viso WESRVA a a ygN ptt4 •7 t, � r y'. , .5 • kS,; ,rt�x^'L� " a q i e W,� �-• t I >� �, ,�a �}ya s SSA d , r°�f R{M4 SANFL! 5 ® 6TANDARO P&NlTRAT10N Y[OT SAG SANfiB k 1 '� �. asDNlkLWt[ hCTlit Y y.�f v 't d�. LAIR/LiNQ ANO ILOW 4riF}� e4 wkF CCUNTS �d[ 1ttt{M1 x i �RYN,Q S&M 1.E ORWE EN[RCY [tq 41l 0It adm wKiM "Ta,teOW Y ,{ jtMf]: Re uuaER'no R[Cws PeX =y �r Ft rNCNra ONCWN KEY TO LOGS FIGURE: . '7 ,47-00T-00— 0 MARCH 1188 IRVINE SG[LS ENUINEEFIRU, INta`. -. .. Sent By: BIG CANYOWC; 949 7209338; Sep-17-01 13:44; Page B/13 A" ATE 1i�86111t1 LTr"' l/16�59 w MGTH60 OP DRILU,mix..8 3gllow-5tem:'Auge � ; }� w „. r� om� ¢ ®I , BORING NO @=1 �r�r w SOIL Tear me �u,=y IL v 1m� m ,.DESCRIPTION .. 1`URF: GRA53 Silty CLAY; CL; stiff, Wet, mottled orange -Brown, tan anti black, angular COMPACTION - clasts ..... 1.1,20 25.5 94.6 Silty CLAY, CL, very stiff, wet, MOISTURE/DEN5ITY: mottled orange -brown,. tan and black ,.,6shtlY' CLAY.. CL, sCLfS. ,wet, mottled 3 'orange, tan and 'gray ' 5.4 IS 32.8 87, Material consistent"Saturated MOISTURE/DENSITY NR Material consistent 41. a'; Ifl s' a 44 , 16 LO a 44.3 74 y « pPIIRC3 K_x MONTFREY Ft7PMATSON . '" t ... SIL,.STONSCSM) ,loose,: wetr highly MOISTIIRE SST7[' .,'weathered t'Jghly fractured, aiII 3= ". X.aterlal ggrisis F+z[tt piedium dense' �i1 -• ry S �• - r -to H -�Pz' v AJj Change =weathered Bedrock 48 NO RECOVERY 41"7847­;001-00--001 LOG OF 8014INC: '. - IRVINE BOILS EROiNZERING.INC_ Ser;t By: BIG 1"ANV0N#CC; 94® 720933B; Sep-17-01 +3:47; Page 1.0/13 . J1 b d, dips 1 t't ".1" s. ,I. . .... ., ++A9i ... .1i L .. .• l r •.:., _... Y,,(y OA1'f'6E9ERVE'D: "°' ` I11b169 METHodI OF DRILL7N4 Hollow -Stem '&uger ' : 196--lb hammer, 36 dry -..^ ,, •, gym.::.;;. LOGGED YY.' NAP GROUND ELEvxnoR:. 196' - LOCATION:_.:: 'See Horing Locstiion Fists. ,n s yi ¢�` �ui a �'- c6 BORING NO. B- 9 c < w Os.'! em SoiLTEST M. DESCRIPTION - . .W w .n0 m O � FILL: N- .silty CLAY, CL, firm, Moist, brown i{ 9 $XPA. SIM � '' � • tcraml consistent, wa¢t,WIth COMPACTION "snquiar bey Eck clasts' `CONSOLIDATION � f j N4 CLAY, CL,stiff, .wet, black. inter- bedded roots, brown and gray sands Clayey SAND, SC,firm, F saturated, " CONSOLSDhTIti7N •; 3&,9 $6.l� c" " •. interiayered 'charcoal. blebe t w' }` " s f , Material Consistent COMPACTION 0 I:t 375 78 2 Material consistent, wept xy o t, , n 0 ..,,„ N� Br7mm' MONTEREY FORMATZCN 12 LL I-5TLTSTONI;.(SM) firm..wet, 'gray- .. _. orange, interbedded sands, highly ..weathered - - •Oi=7'847 mi3di-oo-oo - , LOG OF BORt G RlauRe ... .8 4 .!$VINE SOILS ENdINEWAN06INC.' Sent By: BIG CANYON#CC: 949 7209:i3B; 8ep-17-01 ^3:49; Fage 11113 DATEa9d>d1E61V63> `s 7:l16�8 t •..�Mo�"Mu"Ov 6F DiNCUflr.V 9° HRxllow Stem •Au9erV#x.... M�. f o 14-0 lb. !' Mna r, y„' dtOt oa '. * V C7y.,: ^; See Dor1:°.im •Tw�catirnr F1tazi'�'a tD66iQ dY;. flWOl�1D.ELLS!WBTI�&h i,4G . LC9C.Na WEp SORINA3 iaiay� w►�, ` 6C$ `�> {C9NYiNt gD1 : 601 TEST ".. yY 3'IZ- 39.7 80. Material consistent Material consistent, t:cp_ of sample 26 masaive to Chaotic; tap'has .some -well bedded .. m. �14aterlal! c.aaeisLent,' Ptiffi'wet;" r1` .; . appeari disturbed, MOI�R't1Rl'./prNSSTY' • . �j material uorwistent, }1a ' wet,. unweathered TOTALDEPTH56,5' Gruundkater at_,2Q° "e. Water.leevel measured at:14.5' eftes 113.ng Hole bickfilled:. �...'. _... j Y'' 149 yy x k 4 L 1 k v A flr , wip ig( s:.. r , _ �. •i YR 4 Tky, � T� J '`Yi fl .f �r. r A y( 2 F• �h fl ,a !Lb 1�7847-001--00-0 LOG OF 80 li' G FNd11if�48 � SeTit By: SIO CANYQN#C0; 949 7209338: Sep-17-01 13:51; 'age 12/13 140. lb - ba=ffr a Z - drop GOEP, BY- GROUND, EUVA'M0N,-__Lt�.'_ LOCH ON:,:, See, BoriW Location_ BORING NOLEIL . 7 ..... Z. 99 ON .42 CONCRETE; 4-Inch Pool Deck PILL. C - layey SAND,. SC,. wet soft, brown and COMPACTION black -EXPANSION 0 75.21 SULFATE CONSOLIDATION'. ___'41. fits iY IL I . c. ayey NII.W, , r�`t ALI, WOM3,ZM, orange - gray, numer*us smAii �bedrack clacts 5.4 15S 21.2 2.0.0.8 Clayey silty SAND, SM. madium dense, MOIMIRE/I)WSZ7 4 . Sand'y. CLAY,CL, meshy dense, wet, black topsoil TA" �'2 '22'.9 I0Z4 t-blavk cla" material consistent sent By: SIG CANYON$CC; 949 7209333] Sep 17-01 13:53; -aqe 13113 0 2552 WHITE RS, SUITE B • IRVINE, CA 92614-6236 ALDEN & 949/660-0110 FAX:660-0418 S S 0 CIATE S CIVIL ENGINEERS- LAND SURVEYORS- PLANNERS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: SNYDER LANGSTON BUILDERS 17962 COWAN IRVINE, CA 92614 ATTN: BILL LANGSTON WE ARE FORWARDING BY: MESSENGER NO. OF COPIES DESCRIPTION 3 11"X17" EXHIBITS, 2 SHEETS SENT FOR YOUR: USE PLEASE NOTE: DATE: September 13, 2001 JOB NO.: 1140-458-2X5 DESCRIPTION: BIG CANYON COUNTRY CLUB, POND FILL STATUS: RELEASED REMARKS: BILL, HERE ARE THE TWO DRAWINGS YOU WANTED REDUCED AND PRINTED. HOPE THEY WORK AND PUT THIS ISSUE TO BED. PLEASE CALL ME IF YOU NEED ANYTHING ELSE. THANKS. WA OCIATES BY: WALDEN E-MAIL: dwalden@waldenassociates.net COPIES TO: Document3 Sent By: BIG CANYWCC; • 949 720933B; Sep-17-01 13:36; Page 1 • Big Canyon nn Country Club F"AcsiMILE T=ANSMITTAL. To: �12. I AN GS'tzv.J From: ' s�v� sa C+ Name: Phone: Pages:; Fax: `� q c1 ^ 4°(vn, i S & Date: 1 rj . i "2• 0 Co. 0 Urgent ❑ For Review 0 Pleasio Comment ❑ Please Reply Comments: One B& Canyon Drive .• Newport Bch 0 C :9liforma 92660 Telephone 949.644.5404 .- Maimile 949, 7L0.9338 J R d � '� 11't'l1'IlDw11�l�jIIII'fI'lrqm a q`I�Y �4�}�}ty�'� nin`VI ��Ii _ '; \�\.0 4= W •�. � >+nw F a PRECISE GRADING PLAN BIG CANYON GOLF COURSE FI POND ALDEN T w SSOCI & _ r � \ "'` +a � `c ` yr• •" - > �,� � ,w, r .A rear "�R'tt..g hi \ \ \\ PRECISE GRADING PLAN roe BIG CANYON GOLF COURSE POND NDFIIFUL \ WALDEN k SSOCIATES Wo D roa[•n'rex Note 7877 WW/D i � Faro► io eem,p. us "eft fa41 b4Y r rus b 9 run y�3 Z�L ;onntry Club r Transmission Pipeline Project EQA Compliance List of Contents 1. Notice of Determination (NOD) filed/poswd at County Clerks Office & State Clearinghouse on 2001 for the City decision on the CEQA documem (IS/MND). 2. Response to Public Comments/issues submitted to City per public review of the Recirculated Draft TS/MND (Public Review Period Concluded on June 26, 2000). ,7 qwo, 3. Public Comments received for the 30-day Public Review Period for Recirculated draft IS/MND. (Public Review Period Concluded on April 3, 2001). 4. Public Notice (NOl) posted at project site (March 6, 2001) in 3 separate locations j�(f(the pond near the clubhouse, at the pond near the driving range, and at the entry of the golf course at the intersection of Big Canyon Drive and San Joaquin Hills Roark Photos of posted notice were taken (March 6, 2001). ce45!' ta4e),fli ''Iii C""Y`*� 5. Recirculated Draft TS/MND (March 5, 2001) pubbsbed for a 30-day public review period. Copies of IS/MND sent to Army Corps of Engineers, Calif. Dept fish & Came, Coastal Commission, Caltrans, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (with incorporation of hydrology/drainage maps, and groundwater data). Document also includes public comments received oil I" draft IS/MND. 6. Public Notice — "Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration" fited/posted with County Clerk. Copy of County Clerk stamped filed/posted N01 provided to City of Newport Beach (March 5, 2001). 7. Notice of Completion to State Clearinghouse for Recirculated Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration dated March 5, 2001 published. Nk g. Public Notice (NO posted at project site (on May 27, 2000) in 3 separato locations the pond near the clubhouse, at the pond near the driving range, and at the entry of the golf course at the intersection of Big Canyon Drive and San Joaquin Fills Roa Photos of posted notice were taken. TX RESULT REPORT NAME:PLANNING DEPARTMENT TEL :949 644 3229 DATE:OCT.1612001 22:05 SESSION FUNCTION NO. I DESTINATION STATION DATE TIME PAGE I DURATION I MODE RESULT 0325 TX 01 96613791 OCT.16 22:03 002 1 OOH01'27" ECM OK Big Canyon Country Club Pond Fill, Storm Drain & Sewer Transmission Pipeline Project Final Record of CEQA Compliance List of Contents 1. Notice of Determination (NOD) filed/posted at County Clerks Office & State Clearinghouse on 2001 for the City decision on the CEQA document (IS/MND). 2. Response to Public Comments/Issues submitted to City per public review of the Recirculated Draft IS/MND (Public Review Period Concluded on June 26, 2000)k 7 7 e7,00' 3. Public Comments received for the 30-day Public Review Period for Recirculated draft IS/MND. (Public Review Period Concluded on April 3, 2001). tK 4. Public Noe (NOI) posted at project site (March 6, 2001) in 3 separate locations the pond near the clubhouse, at the pond near the driving range, and at the entry of the golf course at the intersection of Big Canyon Drive and San Joaquin Hills Road. Photos of posted notice were taken (March 6, 2001). A(ea54- awk) fi, P i a (agPyeh) 5. Recirculated Draft IS/MND (March 5, 2001) published for a 30-day public review period. Copies of IS/MND sent to Army Corps of Engineers, Calif. Dept. Fish & Game, Coastal Commission, Caltrans, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (with incorporation of hydrology/drainage maps, and groundwater data). Document also includes public comments received on 15` draft IS/MND. 6. Public Notice — "Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration" filed/posted with County Cleric. Copy of County Clerk stamped filed/posted NOI provided to City of Newport Beach (March 5, 2001). 7. Notice of Completion to State Clearinghouse for Recirculated Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration dated March 5, 2001 published. i9ithte 8. Public Notice (Nosted at project site (on May 27, 2000) in 3 separate locations pond near the clubhouse, at the pond near the driving range, and at the entry of the golf course at the intersection of Big Canyon Drive and San Joaquin Hills Road. Photos of posted notice were taken. t l P Post -It° Fax Note 7671 Date — L # oof 1� Z To l J.✓ �y,, From J .._tea Ga 6r.t . Codoept. Co." Phone # �j Phone# /r V (?�ko Fez # "' '7�.� L, Faz # 9. Draft IS/MND published for a 30-day public review period (May 26, 2000). Copies of IS/MND sent to Army Corps of Engineers, Calif. Dept. Fish & Game, Coastal Commission, Caltrans, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. 10. Public Notice — "Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration" filed/posted with County Clerk. Copy of County Clerk stamped filed/posted NOI provided to City of Newport Beach (May 26, 2000). 11. Notice of Completion to State Clearinghouse - Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. State Clearinghouse No. SCH#200005118 assigned to the Project (May 25, 2000). 0 0 ti 1 b4�o '� �f I • • I" PLANNING DEPTARTMENT CITY HALL 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD P. O. BOX 1768 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658.8915 To: Cheryle Hodge From: I Chris Thayer, Dept. Assistant Fax: (949)661-3791 Fax: 949-644-3229 Phone: Date: September14,2001 Re: Fax from Jay Garcia Pages: 1 3 (including cover sheet) ❑ Urgent O For Review • Comments: Hi Cheryle, How are you? ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle If you have trouble receiving this fax please call me at 949-644- 3200. Thanks, Chris Page 1 of 1 r r Garcia, Jay \� From: Garcia, Jay Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 1:38 PM To: Clauson, Robin Cc: Temple, Patty Subject: FW: Draft Responses to Big Cyn Cntry Club Project Comments Have you had an opportunity to review the Draft Response Document? When are you available to meet with the consultant to go over the information? Can we meet soon to put this it to bed? I will send a hard copy with the list of questions and responses that we got back from the OC Sanitation District. We do not feel that esponses to the piecemealing of the project has been adequately addressed. Our consultant is available this week in the afternoon. She will be on vacation Aug 3 thru Aug 15, 2001. Thanks -----Original Message ----- From: Cheryle Hodge[mailto:Hodgeandassoc@earthlink,net] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:23 PM To: jgarcia@city.newport-beach,ca.us Subject: Draft Responses to Big Cyn Cntry Club Project Comments Jay, I have attached a rough draft of responses to the project issues that we discussed when we met with Robyn (City Attorney's office) about a month ago. I have primarily focused on the topical areas that we discussed at our last meeting. Please let me know when you'd like to meet to discuss the attached and what direction we want to proceed with the project. Thanks, Cheryle 441L �'J /Uk�x.tJ QLV 0 o� 07/30/2001 Blitz Canyon Trunk Sewer Questions and Answers Q1. Since the City of Newport Beach does not have any jurisdiction or authority in regards to the sewer trunk line, what is Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) role in regards to the project, specifically the replacement of the sewer trunk line? Will OCSD be issuing their own grading permit for replacement of the sewer trunk line? Approving CEQA compliance? Al. OCSD is planning to hire Big Canyon Country Club's Consultant, Waldon & Associates, through a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) between Waldon & OCSD to complete the design to replace a portion of OCSD's Big Canyon Trunk Sewer. The design will include obtaining any permits required to replace the sewer, OCSD typically does not obtain grading permits because OCSD constructs sewers in the public right of way, not private property. In this case, OCSD owns a public right of way easement through the Big Canyon Country Club (Golf Course). If a new alignment is required to avoid problems with the new storm drains, then OCSD assumes that the Big Canyon Country Club will grant OCSD a new easement. Also, OCSD expects that if the City of Newport Beach requires a grading permit for the new storm drains on private property owned by the Big Canyon Country Club, then the , application for that permit would include grading provisions for any OCSD sewer. OCSD's Consultant will verify that the proper CEQA documentation/procedures have been performed in relation to OCSD's project. Q2. Are the sewer leaks in the project area and/or from the 1,100' segment to be replaced or the 7,500' entire length to be replaced iy per the strategic plan? A QI-4 A2. There are no sewer leaks (i.e. exfiltration) in the Big Ca on Trunk Sewer. Groundwater infiltration under pressure forces is way into the pipe, not the other way around. The project will re lace a t�Konion of the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer in conjunction with the area affected by the Big Canyon Pond Filling Project. The Big Canyon Trunk Sewer is scheduled to be rehabilitated, in the Strategic Plan, by 2009. �'he rehabilitation will be designed to correct an groundw er infiltration problems into OCSD's sewer, Q3. Is any untreated sewage being leaked (or discharged) to the groundwater beneath the Big Canyon Country Club & Golf Course? 606D � g) • A3. \ There is no untreated sewage being leaked or discharged from OCSD's Big Canyon Trunk Sewer. Q4. What is the groundwater level within the project area (pond & sewer n trunkline)? A4. ( OCSD will investigate and determine the groundwater level during design. 9 Q5. Is any remedial action to remove fecal or other materials from the area of the OCSD pipeline been previously done or now needed? A5 There are no fecal materials in the area of the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer caused by OCSD's sewer pipe. Fecal or other materials, including the water, cannot and do not e>diltrate out of the pipe in the Big Canyon area due to the constant hydraulic conditions of groundwater under pressure. Q6. What is the timing/schedule for replacement of the remaining 7,500' 1 length of sewer trunkline? A6. Rehabilitation of the remaining Big Canyon Trunk Sewer is scheduled to be completed prior to 2009. 4 0ATQ7. What are the current and projected flow amounts in the sewer pipeline and is there appropriate capacity to determine accurately size the sewer line? The current flow volume, projected flow volume, and capacity questions will be analyzed in the design phase. Q8. Is the sewer pipeline project identified per the City's or OCSD's CIP (Capital Improvement Program)? A8. Big Canyon Offsite Sewer Rehabilitation is included in OCSD's Capital Improvement Program. F:\Users\PLN\Shared\I PLANCOM\PENDING\MCANYON\OCSD Questions.doc DRAFT INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION BIG CANYON COUNTRY CLUB STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Response to Project Issues/Questions Presented to City per Public Review of Draft CEQA Document Prepared for: City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92658-8915 Prepared by: Hodge & Associates Ms. Cheryle L. Hodge 24040 Camino del Avion, #A247 Monarch Beach, California 92629 July 2001 M Introduction This document has been prepared for City staff use in evaluating public questions/issues raised and presented in writing to the City of Newport Beach during the public review period on the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Big Canyon Country Club Project. The comment letters are on file with the City of Newport Beach, Planning Department. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the City of Newport Beach is under no obligation to respond to comments received on the IS/MND. Although there is no duty to respond to such comments, the project applicant, Big Canyon Country Club and the City of Newport Beach, has caused this document to be prepared and has done so voluntarily in order to consider and evaluate project questions and/or comments presented to the City. This document has been prepared to focus on the public questions/issues pertaining to the project for several particular topical areas such as the City's compliance with CEQA procedures, biological resources, hydrology/drainage, sewer transmission pipeline, and the operation and use of the golf course. Compliance with CEQA Procedures 1. Comment Questions and/or comments have been submitted to the City that question whether the project has complied with CEQA procedures including public noticing of the project, requirement of City to consider previous written comments dated July 10, 2000 submitted by EIS, and a request that an EIR be prepared. 1. Response The project has complied with CEQA requirements pertaining to Mitigated Negative Declarations. On March 5, 2001 a "Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration) was filed and posted with County Clerks office and City in regards to the proposed MND and it's 30-day public review period. The public notice was also posted at 3 locations including at the pond near the clubhouse, at the pond near the driving range, and at the entry of the Country Club outside of the gated entrance near the intersection of Big Canyon Drive and San Joaquin Hills Road. Photos of the posted notices were taken. Additionally, on March 4, 2001 15 copies of the complete MND and appendix were submitted to the State Clearinghouse as well as USFWS, USCOE, CDFDG, RWQCB, Caltrans, and the Coastal Commission (although site is not located ,in coastal zone). Consultation with regulatory agencies (i.e. CDFG & USCOE)�have also occurred and is on file at the City. In compliance with State law and City procedures, the City has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental compliance for the proposed project. Therefore, the City will not cause to be prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). In compliance with Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Initial Study checklist form and explanation discussion format meets the requirements of the CEQA. Section 15063(d)(3) require that the entries on the Initial Study checklist identifying environmental effects are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries. An Initial Study may rely upon expert opinion supported by facts, technical studies or other substantial evidence to document its findings. An Initial Study is not intended nor required to include a level of detail which would provided in an EIR (Leonoff v. Monterey County Board of Supervisors (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1337). The IS/MND is not intended to be a lengthy detailed document. R1 Sewer Transmission Pipeline 1. Comment Since the City of Newport Beach does not have any jurisdiction or authority in regards to the sewer trunk line, what is Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) role in regards to the project, specifically the replacement of the sewer trunk line? Will OCSD be issuing a grading permit for replacement of the sewer trunk line? Approving CEQA compliance? 1. Response OCSD is planning to hire Big Canyon Country Club's Consultant, Waldon & Associates, through a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) between Waldon & OCSD to complete the design to replace a portion of OCSD's Big Canyon Trunk Sewer. The design will include obtaining any permits required to replace the sewer. OCSD typically does not obtain grading permits because OCSD constructs sewers in the public right of way, not private property. In this case, OCSD owns a public right of way easement through the Big Canyon Country Club (Golf Course). If a new alignment is required to avoid problems with the new storm drains, then OCSD assumes that the Big Canyon Country Club will grant OCSD a new easement. Also, OCSD expects that if the City of Newport Beach requires a grading permit for the new storm drains on private property owned by the Big Canyon Country Club, then the application for that permit would include grading provisions for any OCSD sewer. OCSD's Consultant will verify that the proper CEQA documentation/procedures have been performed in relation to OCSD's project. , 2. Comment Are the sewer leaks in the project area and/or from e 1,100' s ent to be replaced or the 7,500' entire length to be replaced per the strateg plan? 2. Response There are no sewer leaks (i.e. exfrltration) in the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer. Groundwater infiltration under pressure forces its way into the pipe, not the other way around. The project will replace a portion of the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer in conjunction with the area affected by the Big Canyon Pond Filling Project. The Big Canyon Trunk Sewer is scheduled to be rehabilitated, in the Strategic Plan, by 2009. The rehabilitation will be designed to correct any groundwater infiltration problems into OCSD's sewer. 3. Comment Is any untreated sewage being leaked (or discharged) to the groundwater beneath the Big Canyon Country Club & Golf Course? 3. Response There is no untreated sewage being leaked or discharged from OCSD's Big Canyon Trunk Sewer. 4. Comment What is the groundwater level within the project area (pond & sewer trunkline)? 4. Response OCSD will investigate and determine the groundwater level during design. 5. Comment Is any remedial action to remove fecal or other materials from the area of the OCSD pipeline been previously done or now needed? 5. Response There are no fecal materials in the area of the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer caused by OCSD's sewer pipe. Fecal or other materials, including the water, cannot and do not exfiltrate out of the pipe in the Big Canyon area due to the constant hydraulic conditions of groundwater under pressure. 6. Comment What is the timing/schedule for replacement of the remaining 7,500' length of sewer trunkline? 6. Response Rehabilitation of the remaining Big Canyon Trunk Sewer is scheduled to be completed prior to 2009. 7. Comment What are the current and projected flow amounts in the sewer pipeline and is there appropriate capacity to determine accurately size the sewer line? 7. Response The current flow volume, projected flow volume, and capacity questions will be analyzed in the design phase. 8. Comment Is the sewer pipeline project identified per the City's or OCSD's CIP (Capital Improvement Program)? 8. Response Big Canyon Offsite Sewer Rehabilitation is included in OCSD's Capital Improvement Program. 5 11 0 H dDrainase 1. Comment The pipe system, as proposed, would .only cant' the flow that would result from a storm with about a 5-year frequency. 1. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. Per the April 2001 report, the drainage conveyance facilities are generally designed for 10-25 years flows based on hydrology criteria that existed at the time, with habitable structures protected against 100-year flows. 2. Comment By removing the existing pond, any peak -flow reduction associated with that lake will be eliminated, thus reducing the frequency storm that the existing drains can handle. 2. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. The existing pond outlet is a headwall/weir structure with a four -foot difference between top of weir and top of headwall with the ability to overflow downstream. Two separate drainage areas contribute to the pond with approximately 54% from _ the east and 46% from the southeast. Also see response to #3 below. 3. Comment The proposed undersized drainage system will cause the storm flows to back up, resulting in the formation of lake upstream from the proposed pipes. 3. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. The project will replicate the existing ponding and conveyance system as follows: • The southeast drainage, 46% of the total flow, can be ponded adjacent to the 18`h green in the existing inlet sump to a depth of approximately 7 feet. • The east drainage, 54% of the total flow, can be ponded at a headwall/weir inlet structure with a 5-foot differential between top of weir and top of headwall and the ability to overflow downstream. The overflow, should it occur, will be conducted downstream; in a swale designed to accommodate the overflow and to protect any improvements or slopes adjacent to the swale. The maximum depth of any flow in this swale should be less than three feet. 4. Comment The undersized drainage system will create conditions resulting in the reduction of stability of the existing slopes along the stream upstream of theproposed construction. 4. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. See response to #3 above. Biological Resources 1. Comment The biological assessment appears to have been conducted over a year ago and therefore now may be considered unreliable and cannot be used as a factual basis to assess the project's impact. 1. Response The regulatory agencies (i.e. US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and California Department of Fish & Game (CDFG)) have reviewed the biological studies and have also conducted site inspections in addition to site assessments conducted by the biological resource consultant. The project applicant has commenced permit applications with these agencies in compliance with regulatory requirements including biological assessment and survey protocols. The applicant must obtain approval from these regulatory agencies prior to the City's issuance of a grading permit for the project. 2. Comment The need for updated and expanded field surveys is highlighted by the Lead\Agency's recognition that "42 sensitive or special status species of animals and 21 sensitive or special status species of plants that occur with the general regional of the proposed project" could potentially exist on the project site. Since those species are never identified, it not possible to independent determine the potential presence of these unspecified species on or near the project site. If a "database search' was conducted, why was that information not included in technical appendix of the Revised Initial Study? Specifically what sensitive or specials status species were identified in that search? Are there any City, CDFG, or USFWS policies and/or procedures with regard to the currency of biological assessments? After what time period should a biological survey be updated to ensure that it accurately reflects current conditions and from what source is that determination derived? 2. Response The CEQA documentation includes a complete biological resources assessment. As stated previously the site is located within an existing private golf course. Existing residential development and golf course surround the site The Biological Resources study (page 2 and 5) identifies that a literature review included the California Natural Diversity Database and the California Native Plant Society's Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. Therefore, the source is cited that contains the listing of the sensitive or special status animal and plant species that occur in the general region of the project. The cited sources are available to the public. The comment incorrectly characterizes that the biological assessment study (page 4) identifies that these potential 7 sensitive or special status species could potentially exist on the project site. Page 4 of the biological study does not state that these species could potentially exist on the project site but rather states that the species "occur within the general region of the proposed project". In fact, the biology study goes on to clearly state that because of the lack of suitable habitat in the already existing development (a golf course), it not expected that any of these specials plants or animals are present at the proposed project site. 3. Comment The CDFG correspondence submitted to the City (dated June 26, 2000) indicates that the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and appendix containing the biological assessment is inadequate per CDFG. 3. Response The mitigation measures recommended for potential biological resource impacts are based on a professional expert biological assessment of the site. The mitigation measures are drafted in manner to ensure compliance, implementation, and verification. The habitat mitigation plan for wetlands is developed in consultation with the regulatory agencies that have jurisdiction over such resources. The mitigation must comply with state and federal laws. The project can't proceed forward until the City receives evidence identifying that the requirements of the regulatory agencies have been met. The project will comply with the legal requirements pertaining to the breeding season. The project applicant has applied for a CDFG Agreement and issuance of the Agreement is pending the City's completion of the CEQA compliance' As with any project subject to CDFG regulations and compliance, the CDFG reserves the right to require additional environmental documentation and/or adopt the subject CEQA document (IS/MND) for use in the consideration and issuance of a CDFG Agreement. As stated previously, the City will not issue a grading permit for the proposed project until required regulatory agency permits/agreements are obtained and evidence of said compliance is provided to the City. Golf Course Use 1. Comment Comments submitted to the City raise issues/questions pertaining to the expanded use of the golf course and impacts associated with the use of the golf course, including the putting green, expanded depth of the driving range, potential increasb in club membership. 1. Response The proposed project is a private initiated project. The applicant is the Big Canyon Country Club. The project requires a grading permit from the City of Newport Beach. Therefore, the grading permit is subject to review, and approval or denial from the City Building Official. In compliance with State law and City procedures, the subject grading permit request and associated CEQA documentation does not require public hearings and/or meetings be held to consider the project. Additionally, the project (grading permit/CEQA 8 documentation) will not be subject to City Planning Commission review and/or City Council review. The City has conducted a thorough environmental review of the proposed grading permit request. A grading permit is required for the grading activities associated with the project. In addition to the City grading permit, the applicant must obtain approval of other various permits from numerous agencies prior to the commencement of grading/construction activities. For example the project will require review and approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ALOE), California Department of Fish & Game (CDFG), the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the water district. Without approval from these governmental entities that project will not be allowed to proceed. The CEQA document (IS/MND) was provided to these agencies for review and comment and no unavoidable adverse significant impacts were identified by these agencies. The City Planning Department has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate CEQA determination for the proposed project (grading permit request). The IS/MND disclosed information that was provided to the City by the project applicant that indicated that pond site (once filled) would potentially be utilized as a putting green area. Additional golf course improvements identified included relocation of the golf cart paths near the pond and expanding the depth of the driving range. The putting green area, increase depth of the driving range, relocation of golf cart paths etc. are allowable uses in compliance with the Big Canyon Country Club Planned Community. The CEQA documentation disclosed these potential uses for informational purposes only. These uses are permitted uses and do not require any discretionary permit approval beyond that previously approved in conjunction with the original plan and development of the golf course. Therefore, the project activities that are the subject of review and analyses of the CEQA document is the proposed grading permit only. Comments submitted to the City make reference to the expansion of the golf course and impacts associated with potential increase in golf course country club memberships. The Big Canyon Country Club membership is subject to the rules and regulations set forth in their By -Laws. Potential golf course uses of the pond area are disclosed since the project applicant provided this information to the City, however, these uses are allowed and permitted within the existing golf course property boundaries. Additionally, the project applicant indicated that algae have been a problem at the pond. The project applicant is under no obligation to provide alternative solutions for the possible algae problem. The applicant has requested a grading permit for the purposes of filling the pond and constructing associated drainage improvements. Public comments submitted to the City continue emphasis an issue with the use of the site as a putting green area and the modification of the driving range. These uses are permitted allowable uses and are not subject to the subject permit and the associated CEQA document prepared for the proposed grading permit. Although, the City appreciates the concerns expressed in regards to these potential golf course uses, these uses are not subject to the grading permit. Therefore, the project is not an expansion of the existing golf course. W DRAFT INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION BIG CANYON COUNTRY CLUB STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Response to Project Issues/Questions Presented to City per Public Review of Draft CEQA Document Prepared for: City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92658-8915 Prepared by: Hodge & Associates Ms. Cheryle L. Hodge 24040 Camino del Avion, #A247 Monarch Beach, California 92629 ittly 2001 September 14, 2001 •- • Introduction This document has been prepared for City staff use in evaluating public questions/issues raised and presented in writing to the City of Newport Beach during the public review period on the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Big Canyon Country Club Project. The comment letters are on file with the City of Newport Beach, Planning Department. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the City of Newport Beach is under no obligation to respond to comments received on the IS/MND. Although there is no duty to respond to such comments, the City of Newport Beach and the project applicant, Big Canyon Country I"4 tke City of Newpe�r«eh have caused this document to be prepared and has o voluntarily in order to consider and evaluate project questions and/or comments presented to the City. This document has been prepared to focus on the public questions/issues pertaining ' to the project for several particular topical areas such as the City's compliance with CEQA procedures, biological resources, hydrology/drainage, the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer sewer transmission pipelin , and the operation and use of the golf course. The City of Newport Beach will consider the environmental documentation, together with any comments received, prior to the adoption of the CEQA document (i,e. Mitigated Negative Declaratiolli). The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21082.2 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064 clearly state that significant effect is based on substantial evidence, not public controversypeculation. The existence of public controversy over the environmental effects of a project do not require preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR) if there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the lead agency that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. Section 15064(5) of the CEQA Guidelines identifies that argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative, or evidence that is clearly inaccurate or erroneous, or evidence that is not credible, shall not constitute substantial evidence. This IS/MND contains substantial evidence to support all of the conclusions presented herein. That is not to say that there will be potential disagreements with these conclusions. Both the CEQA Guidelines and case law clearly provide standards for treating disagreement among experts. Compliance with CEQA Procedures 1. Comment ' Questions and/or comments have been submitted to the City that question whether the project has, complied with CEQA procedures including public noticing of the project, requirement of City to consider previous written comments dated July 10, 2000 submitted by EIS, and a request that an EIR be prepared. 1. Response The project has complied with CEQA requirements pertaining to Mitigated Negative Declarations, On March 5, 2001 a "Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaratic&was filed and posted with County Clerks office and City in regards to the proposed MND and it's 30-day public review period. The public notice was also posted at 3 locations including at the pond near the clubhouse, at the pond near the driving range, and at the entry of the Country Club outside of the gated entrance near the intersection of Big Canyon Drive and San Joaquin Hills Road. Photos of the posted notices were taken. Additionally, on March 4, 2001 15 copies of the complete MND and appendix were submitted to the State Clearinghouse as well as USA, USCOE, CDF�D�i, R)Y „ Caltrans, and the Coastal Commission (although site is not located in coastal zone). Consultation with regulatory agencies (i.e. CDFG & USCOE) have also occurred and is on file at the City. In compliance with State law and City procedures, the City has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental compliance for the proposed project. Therefore, the City will not cause to be prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). In compliance with Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Initial Study checklist form and explanation discussion format meets the requirements of the CEQA. Section 15063(d)(3) require that the entries on the Initial Study checklist identifying environmental effects are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries. An Initial Study may rely upon expert opinion supported by facts, technical studies or other substantial evidence to document its findings. An Initial Study is not intended nor required to include a level of detail which would provided in an EIR (Leonoff v. Monterey County Board of Supervisors (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1337). The IS/hRm is not intended to be a lengthy detailed document. Sewer Transmission Pipeline 1. Comment Since the City of Newport Beach does not have any jurisdiction or authority in regards to the sewer trunk line, what is Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) role in regards to the project, specifically the replacement of the sewer trunk line? Will OCSD be issuing a grading permit for replacement of the sewer trunk line? Approving CEQA compliance? Vgcvkhv) 1. Response OCSD has indicated to the City th t ' their intent p� to hire Big Canyon Country Club's Consultant, W ld$?i & Associates, through a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) betwee ald&n & OCSD to complete the design to replace a portion of OCSD's Big Canyon Trunk Sewer. The design will include obtaining any permits required to replace the sewer. OCSD typically does not obtain grading permits because OCSD constructs sewers in the public right of way, not private property. In this case, OCSD owns a public right of way easement through the Big Canyon Country Club (Golf Course). If a new alignment is required to avoid problems with the new storm drains, then OCSD assumes that the Big Canyon Country Club will grant OCSD a new easement. Also, OCSD expects that if the City of Newport Beach requires a grading permit for the new storm drains on private property owned by the Big Canyon Country Club, then the application for that permit would include grading provisions for any OCSD sewer. OGSD's Consultant will verify that the proper CEQA documentation/procedures have been performed in relation to OCSD's project. Also, in compliance with the CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the OCSD prepared and processed an EIR for the Strategic Plan that was certified by OCSD on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. 2. Comment Are the sewer leaks in the project area and/or from the 1,100' segment to be replaced or the 7,500' entire length to be replaced per the strategic plan? 2. Response s The OCSD 1)a e indicated to the City of Newport Beach that they do not have evidence of --- ca�__ - iz�icrccz-m sewer leaks (i.e. exfiltration) in the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer including the 1,100' segment to be replaced. The OCSD conducted a O%vw%�s%' (CCTV)inspection on the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer on December 9 and 10, 1999. �G The inspection revealed cracks, mineral deposits, sags, and infiltration. Areas where there is infiltration (the groundwater elevation is above the sewer pipe) will not have exfiltration due to the pressure of the groundwater forcing its way into the pipe. The Big Canyon Trunk Sewer is a gravity sewer that is not under pressure; therefore there is no pressure that would push the sewage out of the pipe. The CCTV inspection did not reveal that that the sewer is leaking. Groundwater infiltration under pressure forces its way into the pipe, not thaet�,, ow( o-f ppz way-aro-m . The project will replace a portion of the Big* Canyon Trunk Sewer in conjunction with the area affected by the Big Canyon Pond Filling Project. The 4 Big Canyon Trunk Sewer is scheduled to be rehabilitated, in the Strategic Plan, by 2009. The rehabilitation will be designed to correct any groundwater infiltration problems into OCSD's sewer. 3. Comment Is any untreated sewage being leaked (or discharged) to the groundwater beneath the Big Canyon Country -Club & Golf Course? 3. Response The OCSD has indicated that there is no untreated sewage being leaked or discharged from OCSD's Big Canyon Trunk Sewer. Also see response to #2 above. 4. Comment What is the groundwater level within the project area (pond & sewer trunkline)? 4. Response OCSD will investigate and determine the groundwater level during design. However, the OCSD have indicated that is estimated that the groundwater level is at a depth of approximately 10' below the surface. The groundwater level is above the existing Big Canyon Trunk Sewer. Spy �4' WMaA-L'M `rf�1C(A �o�t �1/Cl%iU�CS \✓�. mm`ent (� ib uny remedial action to remove fecal or other materials from the area of the OCSD pipeline been previously done or now needed? 5. Response There are no fecal materials in the area of the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer caused by OCSD's sewer pipe. Fecal or other materials, including the water, cannot and do not exfiltrate out of the pipe in the Big Canyon area due to the constant hydraulic conditions of groundwater under pressure. Also see response to #2 above. 6. Comment What is the timing/schedule for replacement of the remaining 7,500' length of sewer trunkline? 6. Response Rehabilitation of the remaining Big Canyon Trunk Sewer is scheduled to be completed prior to 2009. 7. Comment What are the current and projected flow amounts in the sewer pipeline and is there appropriate capacity to determine accurately size the sewer line? 7. Response The current flow volume, projected flow volume, and capacity questions will be analyzed in the design phase. The OCSD Strategic Plan identifies that the 2020 0 peak wet weather flow is 2.43 MGD (the City's draft Recirculated IS/MND also states this on page 25). 8. Comment Is the sewer pipeline project identified per the City's or OCSD's CIP (Capital Improvement Program)? 8. Response Big Canyon Offsite Sewer Rehabilitation is included in OCSD's Capital Improvement Program and OCSD's Strategic Plan adopted in October 1999. Also, in compliance with the CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the OCSD prepared and processed an EIR for the Strategic Plan that was certified by OCSD on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. Hydrology/Drainage 1. Comment The pipe system, as proposed, would only carry the flow that would result from a storm with about a 5-year frequency. 1. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. Per the April 2001 report, the drainage conveyance facilities are generally designed for 10-25 years flows based on hydrology criteria that existed at the time, with habitable structures protected against 100-year flows. Additionally, Walden & Associates (Civil Engineering firm) submitted to the City a precise grading plan for the pond fill and drainage improvements showing the existing drainage patterns for flow into this area. The plan identifies the projected overflow of the storm drain pipes due to downstream pipe clogging or to an event approximating an El Nino storm flow. Walden & Associates have indicated that the project's design can accommodate a projected overflow (as significant as the El Nino event). Also, see response to #2 below. 2. Comment By removing the existing pond, any peak -flow reduction associated with that lake will be eliminated, thus reducing the frequency storm that the existing drains can handle. 2. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. The existing pond outlet is a headwall/weir structure with a four -foot difference between top of weir and top of headwall with the ability to overflow downstream. Two separate drainage areas contribute to the pond with approximately 54% from the east and 46% from the southeast. Also see response to #3 below. 3. Comment n u r] The proposed undersized drainage system will cause the storm flows to back up, resulting in the formation of lake upstream from the proposed pipes. 3. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. The project will replicate the existing ponding and conveyance system as follows: • The southeast drainage, 46% of the total flow, can be ponded adjacent to the 18`h green in the existing inlet sump to a depth of approximately 7 feet. The east drainage, 54% of the total flow, can be ponded at a headwall/weir inlet structure with a 5-foot differential between top of weir and top of headwall and the ability to overflow downstream. The overflow, should it occur, will be conducted downstream in a swale designed to accommodate the overflow and to protect any improvements or slopes adjacent to the Swale. The maximum depth of any flow in this swale should be less than three feet. Walden & Associates (Civil Engineering firm) have submitted to the City a precise grading plan for the pond fill and drainage improvements showing the existing drainage patterns for flow into this area. Also, noted in Walden & Associates projected overflow of the storm drain pipes due to downstream pipe clogging or to an event approximating an El Nino storm flow. This overflow sh be accommodated within the Projected Overflow area to a depth of 2' to 3' w thi o disturbances to existing structures and no hillside deterioration. Walden &,Associates lisalso submitted to the City of Newport Beach a topographic map showing current topographic conditions and the existing drainage pattern from flow into the pond. Also noted is the area of inundation, as best determined ` by Walden & Associates, due to overflow of the pond outlet culverts approximating the El Nino storm flow. 4. Comment The undersized drainage system will create conditions resulting in the reduction of stability of the existing slopes along the stream upstream of the proposed construction. 4. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. See response to #3 above. The precise grading plan and topographic map submitted by Walden & Associates indicate that the drainage design of the proposed project will not result in any reduction of stability of the existing slopes along the stream upstream of the proposed construction. Biological Resources 1. Comment The biological assessment appears to have been conducted over a year ago and therefore now may be considered unreliable and cannot be used as a factual basis to assess the project's impact. 1. Response The regulatory agencies (i.e. US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and California Department of Fish & Game (CDFG)) have reviewed the biological studies and have also conducted site inspections in addition to site assessments conducted by the biological resource consultant. The project applicant has commenced permit applications with these agencies in compliance with regulatory requirements including biological assessment and survey protocols. The applicant must obtain approval from these regulatory agencies prior to the City's issuance of a grading permit for the project. 2. Comment The need for updated and expanded field surveys is highlighted by the Lead Agency's recognition that "42 sensitive or special status species of animals and 21 sensitive or special status species of plants that occur with the general regional of the proposed project" could potentially exist on the project site. Since those species are never -7 identified, Onot possible to independent determine the potential presence of these unspecified species on or near the project site. If a "database search" was conducted, why was that information not included in technical appendix of the Revised Initial Study? Specifically what sensitive or specials status species were identified in that search? Are there any City, CDFG, or USFWS policies and/or procedures with regard to the currency of biological assessments? After what time period should a biological survey be updated to ensure that it accurately reflects current conditions and from what source is that determination derived? 2. kesponse The CEQA documentation includes a complete biological resources assessment. As stated previously the site is located within an existing private golf course. Existing residential development and golf course surround the site The Biological Resources study (page 2 and 5) identifies that a literature review included the California Natural Diversity Database and the California Native Plant Society's Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. Therefore, the source is cited that contains the listing of the sensitive or special status animal and plant species that occur in the general region of the project. The cited sources are available to the public. The comment incorrectly characterizes that the biological assessment study (page 4) identifies that these potential sensitive or special status species could potentially exist on the project site. Page 4 of the biological study does not state that these species could potentially exist on the project site but rather states that the species "occur within the general region of the proposed project". In fact, the biology study goes on to clearly state that because of the lack of suitable habitat in the already existing development (a golf course), it not expected that any of these specials plants or animals are present at the proposed project site. 3. Comment The CDFG correspondence submitted to the City (dated June 26, 2000) indicates that the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and appendix containing the biological assessment is inadequate per CDFG. 3. Response 8 The mitigation measures recommended for potential biological resource impacts are based on a professional expert biological assessment of the site. The mitigation measures are drafted in manner to ensure compliance, implementation, and verification. The habitat mitigation plan for wetlands is developed in consultation with the regulatory agencies that have jurisdiction over such resources. The mitigation must comply with state and federal laws. The project can't proceed forward until the City receives evidence identifying that the requirements of the regulatory agencies have been met. The project will comply with the legal requirements pertaining to the breeding season. The project applicant has applied for a CDFG Agreement and issuance of the Agreement is pending the City's completion of the CEQA compliance. As with any project subject to CDFG regulations and compliance, the CDFG reserves the right to require additional environmental documentation and/or adopt the subject CEQA document (IS/MND) for use in the consideration and issuance of a CDFG Agreement. As stated previously, the City will not issue a grading permit for the proposed project until required regulatory agency permits/agreements are obtained and evidence of said compliance is provided to the City. i Golf Course Use 1. Comment Comments submitted to the City raise issues/questions pertaining to the expanded use of the golf course and impacts associated with the use of the golf course, including the putting green, expanded depth of the driving range, potential increase in club membership. 1. Response The proposed project is a private initiated project. The applicant is the Big Canyon Country Club. The project requires a grading permit from the City of Newport Beach. Therefore, the grading permit is subject to review, and approval or denial from the City Building Official. In compliance with State law and City procedures, the subject grading permit request and associated CEQA documentation does not require public hearings and/or meetings be held to consider the project. Additionally, the project (grading permit/CEQA documentation) will not be subject to City Planning Commission review and/or City Council review. The City has conducted a thorough environmental review of the proposed grading permit request. A grading permit is required for the grading activities associated with the project. In addition to the City grading permit, the applicant must obtain approval of other various permits from numerous agencies prior to the commencement of grading/construction activities. For example the project will require review and approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), California Department of Fish & Game (CDFG), the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the water district. Without approval from these governmental entities that project will not be allowed to proceed. The CEQA document (IS/MND) was provided to these agencies for review and comment and no unavoidable adverse significant impacts were identified by these agencies. The City Planning 9 ry of In u I' Ie Iv<; i' k -Qs.TnO3jjOz 7julISIX5 aq;;o uoisut, xo Us' IOU si; a•oz t oq;'azg3azagy •;iuuod 2uipt,z2 aq; op;oofgns;o A 1i on sasn osagp `sasn asinoo jlo2 leipuo;od asoq; o; spze2az ui passazdxo suzaguo oq; sa;t,ioazdde q TIH i. P P qp 3 �pt� a ; 'g2no • Tuuad 2ui t,zB asodozd a zo ;uaumgop yago pa;t,ioosse Dippue imuod�poafgns Dip o;;oafgns;ou on put, sosn41-4,y algt,molle pagluuad ant, sasn aisagy aBuei 3uinup aq; JO uoi;eogipoui aq; pue eaze uaazS 2utnd t, se oils aq;3o asn aq; q;t anssl ue slsegduta anui;uoo op pa;;nugns s;uauuuoo oilgnd-s;ua,WoAozdun o2t,utezp pa;t,loosse Sui;onllsuoo pue puod aq; SuiII3 3o sasodind Dip io; ;iuuod 2uipez2 t, pa;sonbaz seq pueoilddV'k ,.j aqy •uialgozd at,Slt, algtssq�Dip zo3,.suminlos ani;t,uza;lt, apinozd o; u(x;t,Silgo i1 ou zapun si ;ueoildde ;oafozd?;pgy•' -ptiod oq; ;e uiaigozd E uaaq aneq a`e jz''- k pegp papt,gipui ;ueoildde poofozci tp 'Xjjegpt;ippy •sain:punoq Apodozd asinoo wow' 3Io2 But;sixa aqp ulgplm pap;iuugd put, pamolle ant, sasn osaq; 'zanamoq 'Aj;'O aq; o; n01peuu03ut slq; papinozdlput,otld6 ;oafozd aqnt, c ; aouis pasoloslp am t puod aq;3o sasn asmoo31oB lei;ua;od �'me7-,ig ziaq; ul gJo3;as suolpeln2az P��01'1' salnz aq; o; pgafgns si digsiaguzliz gnlD lbgunoD uoi6D Sig aqy •sdigszaquiauz gnlo tgunoo asinoo 31o2 ui oneaz trt.miva;od q;im pa;t,loosse s;oeduzi pue asinoo oS a o uoisuedxo a o lifd§601 aza az" ut ,C t a o; al4ltu ns s;uounzi -A•ara�w 3I � 3 qI � 3 �.� q3 P g 9V Av)(I " Sluo;iuua85$uip dtlj si puoumoop yago oq;3o sas'Cletm-, -put, moinaz 3o ;oofgns aq; o imp sal;ini;gt, poafozd aqp 'azo;azagy •asinoo 3Io2 aq; 30 ;uatudolanap due,. Id leut2uo aq; gplm not;ounfuoo uI panozddt, ' llsnotnazd;t,q; puolaq`{ t ozd e tuuad Gauoi;azosip Cut, azmbaz;ou op pue sasn , pa;;iuuad am sasn asaq ilusasodintTtlt?uoi;t,uuo3ui zo3 sasn lei;ua;od asaq; "" c. pasoloslp not;epuaumoop.,'yag3 aqy •rsptunauoo pauut,ld quID Allunoo x MO' j'"`: �• Big aqp gplm oout,ilduidy ui sasn algt,molleraze •o;a sgped �Tt,o 3IO2? 3o not;i;oolaz aSuez 2uinup aqp 3o gpdop oseazout tom u-=2 tut;;nd aqy •aSut,z 2utnup aq; 3o q;dap aq; Sutpuedxa put, puod aqp zeau sq;ed jlt,g 3lo2 aq; 3o uot;eoolaz papnjoui pagt;uopl s;uauianozdutt asinoo 31oS It,uotpippy •eam uaaz2 Sutp;nd t, SE pazill;n oq,Cllt,i;ua;od pinom (pollg Dow) ails puod Imp pa;t,oipui;t,q;;ueoilddt, poafozd Dip Xq f4io aqp o; popinozd sum;t,q; umitluuo;ul pasoloslp GNMSI aqy •(;sonbaz pluuod Sulpt,z2) ;oafozd posodozd aq; zo3 uoipeuluua;ap yago a;elzdozddt, aqp si uol;en:loaQ ani;e90M Pa;eSt;Iyq t, PTpauluua;ap seq ;uau4xudaQ 0 Garcia, Jay Subject: Location: Start: End: Show Time As: Recurrence: Meeting Status: Required Attenc Hey all, We are in need o 1. Subdrain failu 2. Lake Filling Pi I understand the Mike Big Canyon Lake Filling and OCSD Sewer Relocation Project Council Chambers Thu 09/06/2001 9:00 AM Thu 09/06/2001 10:00 AM Tentative Garcia, Jay From: Cheryle Hodge (Hodgeandassoc@earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:21 AM To: JGarcia@city.newport-beach.ca.us Subject: Fw: Big Canyon Country Club ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tomko, Mark" <MTOMKO@OCSD.COM> To: "'Cheryle Hodge'', <Hodgeandassoc@earthlink.net> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:56 PM Subject: RE: Big Canyon Country Club > Cheryle, > The District conducted a CCTV inspection on the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer on > December 9 and 10, 1999. The inspection revealed cracks, mineral deposits, > sags, and infiltration. Areas where there is infiltration (the groundwater > elevation is above the sewer pipe) will not have exfiltration due to the > pressure of the groundwater forcing its way into the pipe. The Big Canyon > Trunk Sewer is a gravity sewer that is not under pressure; therefore there > is no pressure that would push the sewage out of the pipe. The CCTV > inspection did not reveal that the sewer is leaking. The current > groundwater elevation has not been determined by the District, but will be > measured in the District's design. The groundwater elevation is not shown > in the original Big Canyon Trunk Sewer drawings from 1968. > An EIR was done for the Strategic Plan, which was certified on October 27, > 1999. A Notice of Completion was filed on October 29, 1999. > Mark Tomko > -----Original Message----- • From: Cheryle Hodge[mailto:Hodgeandassoc@earthlink.net] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 4:26 PM > To: Tomko, Mark > Subject: Big Canyon Country Club > Mark, > Thank you for the information you transmitted regarding the sewer trunkline. > Per a recent meeting with City staff, I've been directed to gather > additional detailed data to complete the response to comments for the final > CEQA documentation. Pertaining to the sewer trunkline I need information to > substantiate the statements that there are no sewer leaks (i.e. dates of > inspection and how inspection was performed i.e. camera etc.). Also, do you > have any info regarding groundwater level (i.e. what was last on record?). > What CEQA documentation was done for the OCSD Strategic Plan (EIR, date of > certification etc.?). Please let me know when you can get me this info. > Thank you in advance for your help. > > Cheryle Hodge 1 Phone (949) 661-6488 • • Fax (949) 661-3791 AIIIALDEN & • SSOCIATES August 23, 2001 Mr. Bill Langston Snyder Langston Builders 17962 Cowan Irvine, CA 92614 RE., Big Canyon Country Club Dear Bill, 2552 WHITIROAD, SUITE B * IRVINE, CA 92614 949/660-0110 FAX:660-0418 CIVIL ENGINEERS• LAND SURVEYORS -PLANNERS RECEIVED 6 TNAENT CIN r,. �1= ry - FUG 'l 7 IMIRM F111 7819110Pi! ti�iwi�l'�1G�6 A In response to the e-mail request of Jay Garcia for information on the Big Canyon Pond Project, I enclose the following exhibits: Topographic Map — 1" = 40' Scale Identified on this map, showing current topographic conditions, are the existing drainage patterns for flow into the pond. Also noted is the area of inundation, as best we can determine, due to overflow of the pond outlet culverts approximating the El Nino storm flow. 2. Precise Grading Plan for Pond Fill —1" = 40' Scale Identified on this plan are the proposed pond fill and drainage improvements showing the existing drainage patterns for flow into this area. Also noted is our projected overflow of the storm drain pipes due to downstream pipe clogging or to an event approximating an El Nino storm flow. This overflow should be accommodated within the "Projected Overflow Area" to a depth of 2' to 3' with no disturbances to existing structures and no hillside deterioration. If you have any questions or need any more information, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, David L. Walden DLW/bb Enclosure F:\WORDDOCS\DLW\I140458 Pond Project.doc Garcia, Jay From: Garcia, Jay Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:05 PM To: 'blangston@snyder-langston.com' RECEf'dFD Cc: Cheryle Hodge (E-mail) Subject: Information request for Big Canyon Pond Project SEP 0 6 2001 Bill, CITY AnMO EY'S OFFICE nianRT BEACH We need from Walden Associates the following information and exhibits Walden Assoc to prepare three exhibits 1.) existing drainage plan showing the flow patterns of storm/rain runoff 2.) proposed drainage plan showing the flow pattern of storm/rain ri 3,ainformation on the drainage flow pattern of the storm/rain runoff (7 ^�I,H or discernible. I believe that this is the last fo the information we need to complete � If Walsen Associates wishes to contact Cheryle Hodge Directly she ca C I am leaving on vacation and you can work out the details with Cheryl ill lt' Gh' P " . CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH• PLANNING DEPARTMENT - i PROJECT'REVIEW REQUEST a e: August 17, 2001 Planner: Jay Garcia, ext. 3206 X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE,RETURN) X PUBLIGWORKSMTILITMS- T FIRE DEPARTMENT PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. X BUILDING/GRADING. DEPARTMENT _ COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Robin•Clauson MARINE SAFETY APPL' ICATION'OF: City, of Ne ort$each CONTACT: Jay Garcia (949) 644-3206 FOR: REVIEW OF`ENGINEERS LETTERS- for Mitigated Negative Declaration What:is the industrystandard for floodprotection? 25yr or 1'00yr storm?` . Any hydrology -information you can. provide,'would be helpful. I have requested. from -Walden Associates, drainage flow plans of existing, proposed and'floWinformn tion'fromEl,Nino stone. DESCRIPTION: 'Request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon• Country Club pond fill Storm Draih,project. The project involves the, placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. The project also involves •partial replacement of 1,10Q feet of an 'Orange'County Sanitation District (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewevline�is•part ofthe Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1.968 and.i's• approximately 7,500 feet in -length. LOCATION: 1 Big Canyon Drive,(Golf Course) REPORT REQUESTED BY: ASAP COMMISSION REVIEW (Tentative): Review and acceptance of the environmental document will be by the Building Ofgcial_(Building Director) Check all that apply: Jd No comments on the project as presented. 0 Recommended conditions of approval are attached. 0 Application of Standard Code requirements 0 Application of Standard Code requirements or the .are not expected to alter the project design. attached conditions of approval will substantially ---- ---- ----impact-or-alterthe-desigsoftheproject. - - - --- 0 Icontacted the applicant on to: p schedule an appointment for Code review, p discuss the following (attach separate sheet ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (p see attached): .30nv 7)atP• • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT REVIEW REQUEST Date: August 17, 2001 Staff Planner: Jay Garcia, ext. 3206 X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) X PUBLIC WORKS/QTILmES -Attn: maco ' 0J� c-� FIRE DEPARTMENT PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. �j X BUILDING/GRADING DEPAR NT / COMMUNITY SERVICES ^FUV (�� OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTO , Robin Cla son MARINE SAFETY APPLICATION OF: City of Newport Beach CONTACT: Jay Garcia (949) 644-3206 FOR: REVIEW OF ENGINEERS LETTERS- for Mitigated Negative Declaration What is the industry standard for flood protection? 25yr or 100yr storm? Any Hydrology information you can provide would be helpful. I have requested from Walden Associates, drainage flow plans of existing, proposed and flow information from El Nino storm. DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club pond fill Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. The project also involves partial replacement of 1,100 feet of an Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. LOCATION: 1 Big Canyon Drive (Golf Course) REPORT REQUESTED BY: ASAP COMMISSION REVIEW (Tentative): Review and acceptance of the environmental document will be by the Building Official (Building Director) Check all that apply: 0 No comments on the project as presented. 0 Recommended conditions of approval are attached. 0 Application of Standard Code requirements 0 Application of Standard Code requirements or the are not expected to alter the project design. attached conditions of approval will substantially impact or alter the design of the project. 0 I contacted the applicant on to: p schedule an appointment for Code review, p discuss the following (attach separate sheet if necessary): ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (p see attached): Signature: Ext. Date: K)4Y -r rre*)ewrl s { N;P,IV(i5 ar /Wa d' TV*,p-% 7o �4�0 t/s J�7isj1!��raT tv6�'r'�` J�jC�jyT !s to��T G'w- eF �' 6 kJ� a� �j/b� /Ylvsr elhcsY 71M1 ��7i . r • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT REVIEW REQUEST Date: August . 0 Staff Planner: Jay Garcia, extxt32 . 3206 X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTA HED (PLEASE RETURN) X PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITIES - A _ FIRE DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN P ANNING DEPT. X BUILDING/GRADING DEPARTMENT _ COMMUNITY SERVICES _ OFFICE OF THE CPI'Y ATTORNEY, Robin Clauson MARINE SAFETY APPLICATION OF: I City of Newport Beach CONTACT: F Jay Garcia (949) 644-3206 FOR: REVIEW OF ENGINEERS LETTERS- for Mitigated Negative Declaration What is the industry standard for flood protection? 25yr or 100yr storm? Any Hydrology information you can provide would be helpful. I have requested from Walden Associates, drainage flow plans of existing, proposed and flow information from El Nino storm. DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the approval of a Grading Penult for the Big Canyon Country Club pond fill Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. The project also involves partial replacement of 1,100 feet of an Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. LOCATION: 1 Big Canyon Drive (Golf Course) REPORT REQUESTED BY: ASAP COMMISSION REVIEW (Tentative): Review and acceptance of the environmental document will be by the Building Official (Building Director) Check all that apply: 0 No comments on the project as presented. A Recommended conditions of approval are attached. 0 Application of Standard Code requirements 0 Application of Standard Code requirements or the are not expected to alter the project design. attached conditions of approval will substantially impact or alter the design of the project. 0 I contacted the applicant on to: p schedule an appointment for Code review, p discuss the following (attach separate sheet ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (p see attached): August 17, 2001 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: 1 Big Canyon Drive (Golf Course) — Storm Drainage FINDINGS & CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Comments: On sheet 131, it states that the standards for storm drain construction in a sump condition should accept all of the flow from a 100-year storm. The City uses the standard that in sump conditions the storm drain system should be able to handle a 25 year storm frequency with all habitable structures be protected from a 100-year storm flow. 2. On sheet 132, it states that the drainage ponds against slopes never ponded against in the past. Public Works Department concern is not whether the drainage flows against slopes not ponded against before, but how close are the slopes to existing residential properties, what is the steepness of the slopes, what is the flow velocity, whether the soil is erosive and whether there will be erosion caused by the ponding. Plan<om\Big Cyn Dmmage 0 Big Canyon We have returned to the City of Newport Beach, Public Works several times in an attempt to find additional information regarding the existing storm drain system that currently drains the existing Big Canyon Golf Course Lake. At this time we have been unable to find any additional information. We have not been able to locate the plans that built the existing lake outlet pipes nor any of the drainage facilities downstream of them. We also have not been able to locate any hydraulic drainage study that would indicate the amount of flow that these systems were designed to carry. We, therefore, preformed a hydrology study using the Orange County's hydrograph method using the AES computer software to determine the 100-yr (0.01 %) flow rate at the Big Canyon Golf Course Lake. This. study resulted in a 100-yr flow rate of 1431 cubic feet per second (0100=1431 cfs). Our hydraulic study then vary closely agrees with that done by Walden & Associates In their study titled "Hydraulic & Structural Analysis" and signed by Ralph E. Bolles. In that study they state that the pipe system will carry 740cfs and the proposed triangular earthen swale along the contact of the proposed earth fill and the existing slope on the far side of the lake away from the existing clubhouse will carry 700cfs. The sum of these flows is 1440cfs, which is virtually identical to our study. With this knowledge we can say that the pipe system as proposed would only carry the flow that would result from a storm with about a 5-yr return frequency. . . Therefore, requiring any flows resulting from a larger storm to drain through the proposed earthen swale. Today's accepted community standards require that a storm drain system located in a low point be designed to accept all of the flow from the 100-yr storm. At the time that the existing drainage system was probable built the standard could have only require the drain to accept a 25-yr storm flow. — y removing the existing lake, as proposed, this will result in the loss of any, peak flow reduction that this lake has on the storm flow as it passes through the lake. Thereby, reducing the frequency storm that the existing drains can Al handle. The proposed undersized drainage system will cause the storm flows to back up resulting in a small lake to form upstream of the proposed pipes. � This will result in storm water pounding on the base of the existing'that have never had water on them before. I I ( 3 / t • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT REVIEW REQUEST Date: August 17, 2001 Staff Planner: Jav Garcia, ext. 3206 X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) X PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITIES - Attn: Mike Sinacori _ FIRE DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. X BUILDING/GRADING DEPARTMENT _ COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Robin Clauson MARINE SAFETY APPLICATION OF: City of Newport Beach CONTACT: Jay Garcia (949) 644-3206 FOR: REVIEW OF ENGINEERS LETTERS- for Mitigated Negative Declaration What is the industry standard for flood protection? 25yr or 100yr storm? Any Hydrology information you can provide would be helpful. I have requested from Walden Associates, drainage flow plans of existing, proposed and flow information from El Nino storm. DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club pond fill Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. The project also involves partial replacement of 1,100 feet of an Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. LOCATION: 1 Big Canyon Drive (Golf Course) REPORT REQUESTED BY: ASAP COMMISSION REVIEW (Tentative): Review and acceptance of the environmental document will be by the Building Official (Building Director) Check all that apply: 0 No comments on the project as presented. 0 Recommended conditions of approval are attached. 0 Application of Standard Code requirements 0 Application of Standard Code requirements or the are not expected to alter the project design. attached conditions of approval will substantially impact or alter the design of the project. 0 I contacted the applicant on to: p schedule an appointment for Code review, p discuss the following (attach separate sheet if necessary): ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (p see attached): Signature• Ext. Date: • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT REVIEW REQUEST Date: April 17, 2001 Staff Planner: Jay Garcia, ext 3206 X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) X PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITIES - Attn: Mike Sinacori FIItE.DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. BtTILb�G%GRADIN,G;DEPARTN T. COMMUNITY SERVICES X OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Robin Clauson MARINE SAFETY REVENUE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (Commercial Development Only) APPLICATION OF: City Hof Beach CONTACT: Ja Garcia 949 644-3206 FOR: REVIEW OF COMMENTS- Mitigated Negative Declaration i DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club pond fill Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. The project also involves partial replacement of 1,100 feet of an Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. LOCATION: 1 Big Canyon Drive (Golf Course) REPORT REQUESTED BY: ASAP or by April 27,200 COMMISSION REVIEW (Tentative) Check all that aRRly- ❑ No comments on the project as presented. ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements are not expected to alter the project design. py �t oA wd I contacted ton following (attach separate sheet if necessar ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (O see 411LLV �)Ti; 4 �t P' Review and acceptance of the environmental document will be by the Building Official (Building Director) ❑ Recommended conditions of approval are attached. ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements or the attached conditions of approval will substantially impact or alter the design of the project. to: 0 schedule an appointment for Code review,-M discuss the P, a- 'W'02"" r ., . V r, �..���� ,: ,. ��� .. 18012 C4&N, SUITE 210 • IRVINE, CA 92614 LDEN & • 9491660-0110 FAX:660-0418 3 S 0 CIATE S CML ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - LAND SURVEYORS RESPONSE TO HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES DRAINAGE REPORT — APRIL 2001 Drainage conveyance facilities are generally designed for 10-25 year flows based on hydrology criteria that existed at the time, with habitable structures protected against 100-year flows. The existing pond is maintained at equilibrium with outflows equaling inflows in a flowby condition. The existing pond outlet is a headwall/weir structure with a four -foot difference between top of weir and top of headwall with the ability to overflow downstream. Two separate drainage areas contribute to this pond with approximately 54% from the east and 46% from the southeast. The proposed plan will replicate the existing ponding and conveyance system as follows: • The southeast drainage, 46% of the total flow, can be ponded adjacent to the eighteenth green in the existing inlet sump to a depth of approximately 7 feet. • The east drainage, 54% of the total flow, can be ponded at a headwall/weir inlet structure with a 5-foot differential between top of weir and top of headwall and the ability to overflow downstream. The overflow, should it occur, will be conducted downstream in a Swale designed to accommodate the overflow and to protect any improvements or slopes adjacent to the Swale. The maximum depth of any flow in this Swale should be less than three feet. • All habitable structures will be protected against 100-year flows. The proposed Project will be permitted under existing codes of the City of Newport Beach, after the plans have been thoroughly checked by professional engineers of the City of Newport Beach staff. The design and construction will follow best management practices. FAWORDDOC I)Mresponse-dainagereport4-0Ldoc BIG CANYON COUNTRY&B Pond Fill, Storm Drain & Sewer Transmission Pipeline Project Attachment D DRAINAGE REPORT HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES Recirculation of Revised Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Attachments April 2001 no Big Canyon We have returned to the City of Newport Beach, Public Works several times in an attempt to find additional information regarding the existing storm, drain system that currently drains the existing Big Canyon Golf Course Lake. At this time we have been unable to find any additional information. We have not been able to locate the plans that built the existing lake outlet pipes nor any of the drainage facilities downstream of them. We also have not been able to locate any hydraulic drainage study that would indicate the amount of flow that these systems were designed to carry. We, therefore, preformed a hydrology study using the Orange County's hydrograph method using the AES computer software to determine the 100-yr (0.01 %) flow rate at the Big Canyon Golf Course Lake. This, study resulted in a 100-yr flow rate of 1431 cubic feet per second (Qt00=1431 cfs). Our hydraulic study then vary closely agrees with that done by Walden & Associates in their study titled "Hydraulic & Structural Analysis" and signed by Ralph E. Bolles. in that study they state that the pipe system, will carry 740cfs and the proposed triangular earthen swale along the contact of the proposed earth fill and the existing slope on the far side of the lake away from the existing _ clubhouse will carry 700cfs. The sum of these flows is 1440cfs, which is virtually identical to our study. With this knowledge we can say that the pipe system as proposed would only carry the flow that would result from a storm with about a 5-yr return frequency. Therefore, requiring any flows resulting from a larger storm to drain through the proposed earthen swale, Today's accepted community standards require that a storm drain system located in a low point be designed to accept all of the flow from the 100-yr storm. At the time that the existing drainage system was probable built the standard could have only require the drain to accept a 25-yr storm flow, SiRsy removing the existing lake, as proposed, this will result in the loss of any At peak flow reduction that this lake has on the storm flow a; it passes through the lake. Thereby, reducing the frequency storm that the. existing drains can 1 handle: The proposed undersized drainage system will cause the storm flows to back up resulting in a small lake to form upstream of the proposed pipes. This will result in storm water pounding on the base of the existing that have never had water on them before. YR*}kY*i#i##k##kwi#*#ki#iii}iYY}iWY#*i###k#*##wiiwi##}#*••4 •i #kwwwww}k*1ki*k�f•1 NON -HOMOGENEOUS WATERSHED AREA -AVERAGED LOSS RATE (Fm) AND LOW LOSS FRACTION ESTIMATIONS (C) Copyright 1989-99 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) ver. 8.0 Release Date: 01/01/99 License ID 1239 Analysis prepared by: HUNSAXER s ASSOCIATES Irvine, Inc. Planning * Engineering * Surveying Three Hughes * Irvine, California 92618 * (949; 583-1010 *** NON -HOMOGENEOUS WATERSHED AREA -AVERAGED LOSS RATE (flu) AND LOW LOSS FRACTION ESTIMATIONS FOR AMC III: TOTAL 29-HOUR DURATION RAINFALL DEPTH 5.63 (inches) SOIL -COVER AREA PERCENT OF SCS CURVE LOSS RATE TYPE (Acres) PERVIOUS AREA NUMBER Fp(i.n./hr.) YIELD 1 585.010 60.00 91.( 75.) 0.200 0.873 TOTAL AREA (Acres) = 585.00 AREA -AVERAGED LOSS RATE, Fm (in./hr.) = 0.120 AREA -AVERAGED LOW LOSS FRACTION, Y = 0,127 /7� 3 i ta•*ixwwww*#wx**xrx* ***t#***i#ii#**#4#Ri4+i*;**#+** i•*+**+ia+*x*#+i++RyY F L O O D R O U T I N G A N A L Y S 3: S USING COUNTY HYDROLOGY MANUAL OF ORANGE(1986) (c) Copyright 1989-99 Advanced Engineering Sottware (aes) Ver. 7.0 Release Date: 01/01/99 License ID 1239 Analysis prepared by: HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES Irvine, Inc. Planning * Engineering * Surveying Three Hughes * Irvine, California 92618 * (949) 583-1010 rai*x*x*x••#ir****+*+*#+++*+ DESCRIPTION OF STUDY *********#x##*#+w**#*****+ * W.O. 2552-1T + LAGUNA BEACH * 100-YEAR HYDROLOGY STUDY x www*xwwxwwxwwwwwwwwxx*x xxx*xx#+ix+#xrx*xxx*x*x;t+++*++*r+++*+**#***+*+rx+: FILE NAME: LAGUNA.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 10:08 09/09/2000 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE 1 ^-^---..--^----------^-- ---------------------------------•------------------- »»>SUBAREA RUNOFF (UNIT-HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS) ««< csaaoaa=aaa===e=aaaava==:ar�uaaaaoaw���ava=.._-_.sr.vacvaavvcaa=a=aanaaaa=a=== (UNIT-HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO STREAM #1) WATERCOURSE LENGTH = 9200.000 FEET I LENGTH FROM CONCENTRATION POINT TO CENTROID = 4600.000%FEET ELEVATION VARIATION ALONG WATERCOURSE 530.000 FEET BASIN FACTOR - 0.025 WATERSHED AREA 585.000 ACRES BASEFLOW - 0.000 CFS/SQUARE-MILE WATERCOURSE nLAG" TIME - 0.237 HOURS CAUTION: LAG TIME IS LESS THAN 0.50 HOURS. THE 5-MINUTE PERIOD UH MODEL (USED IN THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM) MAY BE TOO LARGE FOR PEAK FLOW ESTIMATES. STORM RETURN FREQUENCY - 100-YEAR FOOTHILL S-GRAPH SELECTED MAXIMUM WATERSHED LOSS RATE(INCH/HOUR) `_` 0.120 LOW LOSS FRACTION - 0.127 *RYDROGRAPH MODEL M1 SPECIFIED* SPECIFIED PEAK 5-MINUTES RAINFALL(INCH)= 0.52 SPECIFIED PEAK 30-MINUTES RAINFALL(INCH)= 1.09 SPECIFIED PEAK 1-HOUR RAINFALL(INCH) a 1.45 SPECIFIED PEAK 3-HOUR RAINFALL(INCH) = 2.43 SPECIFIED PEAK 6-HOUR RAINFALL(INCH) � 3.36 SPECIFIED PEAK 24-HOUR RAINFALL(INCH) = 5.63 PRECIPITATION DEPTH -AREA REDUCTION FACTORS: 5-MINUTE FACTOR = 0.974 30-MINUTE FACTOR - 0.974 1-HOUR FACTOR = 0.974 3—HOUR FACTOR - 0.596 6-HOUR FACTOR = 0.998 24-HOUR FACTOR a 0.999 13� UNIT HYDROGO TIME UNIT a 5.000 MINUTES UNIT INTERVAL PERCENTAGE OF LAG -TIME - 35.122 2 ��aaalOL�a.... saaaauJ>vaalata<aacaxaaavasms==...Aavvvptly::C �_=aa=�=ocacaaaaa UNIT HYDROGRAPH DETERMINATION _---------- INTERVAL -------------------------------------------------- "S" GRAPH UNIT HYDROGRAPH NUMBER --------------------------------------------------------••------------------- MEAN VALUES ORDINATES(CFS) 1 2.648 187.3$2 2 11.782 646.210 3 34.704 1621.678 4 62.325 1954.157 5 73.632 799.979 6 80.932 516.463 1 86.250 376.248 8 90.095 271.971 9 93.067 210.288 10 95.221 152.422 11 96.670 102.501 12 97.753 76.570 13 98.150 28.126 14 98.332 12.853 15 98.513 12.853 16 98.695 12.850 17 98.877 12.842 18 99.058 12.865 19 99.240 12.842 20 99.421 12.842 21 99.603 12.842 22 99.785 12.842 23 99.966 12.842 24 100.000 2.405 ------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL SOIL -LOSS VOLUME(ACRE-FEET) = 31.1577 TOTAL STORM RUNOFF VOLUME(ACRE-FEET) 242.8568 ------------------------------------------------------- .w 2/ `mmuammsasmco9sasz:sm�mmaasvamssasysm9amasascasssa.aaausmamassmcsccva 3 2 4- H O U R S T O R M R U N O F F R Y D R 0 G R A P H nsavammamammmmmasmssaas-.v9oaveaasexsssssacaysysaaseaaes.aa=ascesasssamsmmma HYDROGRAPH IN FIVE-MINUTE UNIT INTERVALS(CFS) (Note: Time indicated - ------------------------------------ i.s at END of Each Unit Inte:rvals) TIME(HRS) ------------------------------------------------ VOLUME(AF) Q(CFS) ----------------------------------------- 0. 375.0 750.0 1125.0 1500.0 0.083 0.0082 1.19 ---------------------------- Q 0.167 0.0448 5.31 Q 0.250 0.1525 15.64 Q , 0,333 0.3461 28.12 Q 0.417 0.5755 33.30 Q 0.500 0.8282 36.69 Q 0.583 1.0982 39.21 VQ 0.667 1.3810 41.07 VQ 01750 1.6740 42.54 VQ 0,833` 1.9747 43.66 VQ 0.917 2.2808 44.45 VQ 1.000 2.5914 45.09 VQ 1.083 2.9042 45.42 VQ 1,167 3.2187 45.66 VQ 1.250 3.5349 45.90 VQ 1.333 3.8527 46.14 VQ 1.417 4.1721 46.39 VQ 1.500 4.4933 46.63 VQ , 1.583 4.8161 46.88 VQ 1.667 5.1407 47.13 _ VQ 1.750 5.4669 47.37 VQ 1.833 5.7950 47.63 VQ 1.917 6.1247 47.88 .0 2.000 6.4558 48.07 Q 2.083 6.7880 48.24 Q 2.167 7.1215 48.42 .0 2.250 7.4562 48.60 Q „ 2.333 7.7922 48.78 Q 2.417 8,1294 48.96 Q 2.500 8.4679 49.15 Q 2.583 8.8077 49.33 Q 2.667 9.1488 49.52 Q 2.750 9.4911 49.71 Q "': 2.833 9.8348 49.91 Q 2.917 10.1798 50.10 Q 3.000 10.5262 50.29 Q 3.083 10.8739 50.49 Q 3.167 11.2230 50.69 Q 3.250 11.5735 50.89 Q 3.333 11.9254 51.10 Q' 3.417 12.2787 51.30 .QV 3.500 12.6334 51,51 QV 3.583 12.9896 51.72 QV 3.667 13.3473 51.93 QV ' 3,750 13.7064 52.14 QV 3.833 14.0670 $2.36 QV 3.917 14.4291 52.56 QV 4.000 14,7928 52.80 Qv 4.083 15.1579 53.02 QV 4.167 15.5247 53.25 QV 4.250 15.8930 53.48 QV 4.333 16,2630 53.72 QV n 4.417 16.6345. 53.95 QV • 4.500 17.0077 54.19 QV 4.583 17.3825 54.42 QV 4.667 17.7590 54.67 QV 1,750 18.1372 54.91 QV 4.833 18.5171 55.16 Q V 4.917 18.8987 55.41 Q V 5.000 19.2821 55.67 Q V 5.083 19.6672 55.92 Q V 5:167 20.0541 • 56.18 .0 V 5.250 20.4429 56.44 Q V 5.333 20.8334 56.71 Q V 5.417 21.2259 56.98 Q V 5.500 21.6202 57.26 Q V 5.563 22,0164 57.53 Q v 5.667 22.4146 57.81 Q V 5.750 22.8147 58.09 Q V 5.833 23.2168 58.38 .0 V 5.917 23.6208 58.67 Q V 6.000 24.0270 58.97 .Q V , 6,0831 24,4351 59.27 Q V 6.167 24.8454 59.57 Q V 6.250 25.2578 59.88 Q V 6.333 25.6723 60.19 Q V 6.417 26.0890 60.50 Q V 6.500 26,5079 60.83 Q v 6.583 26.9290 61.14 Q v 6.667 27.3524 61.48 Q V 6.750 27.7781 61.81 Q v 6.833 28.2061 62.15 Q V 6,917 28.6364 62.49 Q V 7,000 29.0692 62.84 Q V 7.083 29.5044 63.19 .0 V 7.167 29.9420 63.55 Q V 7.250 30.3822 63.91 Q V 7,333 30,8249 64.28 Q V 7.417 31.2701 64.65 .0 V 7.500 31.7180 65.03 Q V 7.583 32.1685 65.41 Q V 7.667 32.6218 65.81 Q V 7,750 33.0778 66.20 Q V 7.833 33.5365 66.61 Q V 7.917 33.9981 67.02 .0 V 81000 34,4626 67.44 .Q V 8.083 34.9299 67.86 .Q V "'"8.167 35.4003 68.30 Q V 8.250 35.8736 68.73 .Q v 8.333 36.3501 69.18 Q V 8.417 36.8296 69.63 .0 v 8.500 37.3124 70.10 Q V 8,583 37.7983 70.56 Q V 8.667 38.2875 71,04 Q V 8.750 38.7801 71.52 Q v 8.833 39.2761 72.02 Q V 8.917 39.7756 72.52 Q V 9,000 40.2786 73.04 Q V 9.083 40.7851 73.55 Q v 9.167 41.2954 74.09 Q V 9.250 41.8094 74.63 Q V 9.333 42.3272 75.19 . Q V , 9.417 42.8498 75.74 . Q V . 9.500 43,3745 76.32 Q V . 9.503 43.9041 76.90 Q V 9.667 44,4379 77.51 Q V , H �-7 t 9.750 44.9758 • 78.11 . Q V , 9.833 45.5181 78.74 . Q V , 9.917 46.0647 79.37 Q V 10.000 46.6158 80.02 Q V , 10.083 47.1715 80.68 Q V , 10.167 47.7318 81.37 Q V , 10.250 48.2969 82.05 Q V 10.333 48.8659 82.77 Q V , 10.417 49.4418 83.48 . Q V . 10.500 50.0219 84.23 . Q V , 10.583 50.6072 84.98 . Q V . 10.667 51.1979 85.76 , Q V . 10.750 51.7939 86.55 . Q V . 10.833 52.3957 87.37 . Q V . •10.917 53.0031 88.20 . Q V . 11.000 53.6165 89.06 . Q V . 11.083 54.2358 89.93 . Q V . 11.167 54.8614 90.84 , Q V. 11.250 55.4933 91.75 . Q V. 11,333 56,1318 92.71 , Q V. 11.417 56.7770 93.67 , Q V. 11.500 57.4291 94.69 . Q V. 11.583 58.0882 95.71 . Q V. 11.667 58.7547 96.78 , Q V. 11,750 59.4287 97.85 . Q V. 11.833 60.1104 98.99 , Q V. 11.917 $0.8001 100.13 . Q V 12.000 61.4980 i01.34 . Q V 12.083 62.2095 103.30 . Q V 12.167 62.9474 107.15 . q, V 12.2b0 63.7387 114.89 Q V 12.333 64.5929 124.04 Q V 12.417 65.4790 128.65 Q V 12.500 66.3897 132.24 Q v 12.583 67.3214 135.28 Q V 12.667 68,2720 138.02 Q V 12.750 69.2398 140.53 Q V 12.833 70.2241 142.92 Q V 12.917 71.2237 145.13 Q V 13.000 72.2386 147.36 Q V 13.083 73.2677 149.42 Q V 13.167 74.3114 151.56 Q V 13.250 75.3701 153.72 Q V 13.333 76.4447 156.03 Q V 13.417 77.5354 158.$7 Q V "`L3.500 78.6434 160.88 Q V 13.583 79.7690 163.44 Q V 13.667 80.5135 166.19 Q V 13.750 .82.0774 168.99 Q V 13.833 83.2620 172.01 Q V 13.917 84.4679 175.10 Q V 14.000 85.6966 178.40 Q V 14.083 86.9502 182.01 Q V 14.167 88.2343 186.46 Q V 14.250 89.5578 192.18 Q V 14.333 90.9259 198.64 Q V 14.417 92.3301 203.90 Q V 14.500 93.7711 209.23 Q V 14.583 95.2492 214.62 Q V 14.667 96.7669 220.38 Q V 14.750 98.3258 226.35 Q V 14.833 99.9298 232.89 Q V 14.917 101.5810 239.76 Q V 15.000 103.2850 247.41 Q V a 15.083 105.0452• 255.58 Q 15.167 106.8689 264.81 Q 15.250 108.7620 274.88 Q 15,333 110.7350 286.47 Q , 15.417 112.7865 297.B8 Q 15.500 114.9066 307.83 Q , 15.583 117.0562 312.13 Q , 15.667 119.2426 317.47 Q , 15.750 121.5620 336.77 Q , 15.833 124.0857 366.44 Q, 15.917 126.9227 411.93 Q 16.000 130.2BB7 488.75 16.083 134.9209 672.60 16.167 141.6440 976.18 16.250 151.1901 1386.10 16.333 161.0457 1431.02 16.417 167.2157 895.88 16.500 172.0305 699.11 16.5B3 176.0911 589.60 , 16,667 179.6121 511.24 16.750. 182.7007 448.47 Q 16.833 185.4015 392.1$ Q 16.917 187.7679 343.61 Q, 17.000 189.8865 307.62 Q , 17.083 191.7.352 268.43 Q 17.167 193.4283 245.84 Q 17.250 195.0210 231.26 Q 17.333 196.5262 218.56 Q 17.417 197.9616 208.42 Q 17.500 199.3364 199.63 Q 17.583 200.6578 191.86 Q 17.667 201.9308 184.04 Q 17.750 203.1594 178.39 q 17.833 204.3448 172,12 Q 17.917 205:4865 165.78 Q 18.000 206.5623 156.21 Q 18.083 207.5933 149.70 Q 18.167 208.5779 142.96 Q 18.250 209.4927 132.83 Q , 18.333 210.3306 121.66 Q 18.417 211.1251 115.36 Q 18.500 211.8856 110.43 Q 18.583 '212.6175 106.26 Q 18.667 213.3247 102.69 Q 18.750 214.0101 99.52 Q '18.833 214,6763 96.73 Q 18.917 215.3255 94.26 Q 19.000 215.9592 92.02 Q 19.083 216.5795 90.08 Q 29.167 217.1876 88.29 Q 19.250 217.7840• 86.59 Q 19.333 218.3692 84.97 . Q 19.417 218.9437 83.42 . Q 19.500 219.5081 81.95 Q 19.583 220,0627 80.53 Q , 19.667 220.6080 79.17 Q 19.750 221.1443 77.87 Q 19.833 221.6720 76.62 Q 19.917 222.1913 75.42 Q 20.000 222.7030 74.30 Q 20.083 223.2074 73.23 Q 20.167 223.7047 72.20 Q 20.250 224.1951 71.21 Q 20.333 224.6790 70.26 Q uo v ,• V v, v . v, v V. V. v V V V Q V V Q V Ti Q Q . V v V. V. V V v v .V .V v V V v V V v V v V v V v v V v v v V V v v V v V v V v v V V , V v v v V V V 20.417 225.1565 69.33 Q 7 • V 20,500 225,627E • 68.44 Q V 20.583 226.0932 67.58 Q V 20.667 226.5529 66.74 Q V , 20.750 227,0070 65.93 Q V . 20.833 227.4557 65.15 .Q V , 20.927 227.8992 64.39 .0 V , 21.000 228.3376 63.66 Q V 21.083 228.7710 62.94 Q V 21.167 229,1997 62.24 4 V , 21.250 229.6237 61.57 Q V , 21.333 230.0433 60.91 Q V , 21.417 230.4584 60,27 .0 V , 21,500 230.8692 59.65 Q V 21.583 231.2759 59.05 Q V 21.667 231,6785 58.46 Q V 21.750 232,0772 57.89 Q y 21.833 232.4720 57.33 Q V , 21.917 232.8630 56.78 .Q V . 22.000 233.2504 56.25 .0 y , 22.083y 233.6342 55.73 Q V , 22.167 234,0145 55.22 Q V , 22.250 234.3913 54.72 Q V , 22.333 *234.7649 54.24 .4 V . 22.417 235.1352 53.77 Q V , 22.500 235.5023 53.30 Q V , 22.583 235.8663 52.85 .0 V , 22.667 236.2272 52.41 Q V , 22.750 236.5852 51.98 Q V , 22.833 236.9402 51.55 Q V. 22.917 237.2924 51.14 Q V. 23.000 237.6418 50.73 Q V. 23.083 237.9884 50.33 Q V. 23.267 238.3324 49.94 .Q V. 23.250 238.6737 49.56 Q V. 23.333 239.U124 49.19 Q V. 23,417 239.3486 48.82 .0 V. 23.500 239.6824 48.46 Q I V. 23.583 240.6137 48.10 Q V. 23.667 240.3426 47.76 .0 V. 23.750 240.6691 47.42 Q V. 23,833 240.9934 47.08 Q V. 23.917 241.3154 46.75 Q V. 24.000 241.6352 46.43 Q V. 24,083 241.9446 44.93 .0 V. "'24.167 242,2236 40.52 Q V. 24.250 242.4299 29.95 Q V. 24.333 242.5493 17,34 Q V. 24.417 242.6330 12.15 Q V. 24.500 242.6935 8,78 Q V. - 24.583 242.7371 6.34 Q V. 24.667 242.7686 4.57 Q V. 24.750 242.7906 3.20 Q V. 24.833 242.8058 2.21 Q V. 24.917 242.8165 1.55 Q V. 25.000 242.8237 1.05 Q V. 25.083 242.8297 0.86 Q V. 25.167 242.8350 0.78 Q V. 25•.250 242.8398 0.69 Q V. 25.333 242.6439 0.60 Q V. 25.417 242.8475 0.52 Q V. 25.500 242.8504 0,43 Q V. 25.583 242.8528 0.35 Q V. 25.667 242.8546 0.26 Q V. 25.750 242.855 0 0.18 Q y, 25.833 242.856 0.10 Q y, 25.917 242.8567 0.02 Q y, mmaamaaasasaass=avvavmvmr vo��.masmmvvvvvvmvmemvw cssssvr_ccvvcacvsammvv wums�. END OF FLOODSCx ROUTING ANALYSIS .m . ,_I. LUIT. 1 '7 INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION BIG CANYON COUNTRY CLUB STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Response to Project Issues/Questions Presented to City per Public Review of Draft CEQA Document Prepared for: City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92658-8915 Prepared by: Hodge & Associates Ms. Cheryle L. Hodge 24040 Camino del Avion, #A247 Monarch Beach, California 92629 July 2001 Introduction This document has been prepared for City staff use in evaluating public questions/issues raised and presented in writing to the City of Newport Beach during the public review period on the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Big Canyon Country Club Project. The comment letters are on file with the City of Newport Beach, Planning Department. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the City of Newport Beach is under no obligation to respond to comments received on the IS/MND. Although there is no duty to respond to such comments, the project applicant, Big Canyon Country Club and the City of Newport Beach, has caused this document to be prepared and has done so voluntarily in order to consider and evaluate project questions and/or comments presented to the City. This document has been prepared to focus on the public questions/issues pertaining to the project for several particular topical areas such as the City's compliance with CEQA procedures, biological resources, hydrology/drainage, sewer transmission pipeline, and the operation and use of the golf course. 2 Compliance with CEQA Procedures 1. Comment Questions and/or comments have been submitted to the City that question whether the project has complied with CEQA procedures including public noticing of the project, requirement of City to consider previous written comments dated July 10, 2000 submitted by EIS, and a request that an EIR be prepared. 1. Response The project has complied with CEQA requirements pertaining to Mitigated Negative Declarations. On March 5, 2001 a "Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration) was filed and posted with County Clerics office and City in regards to the proposed MND and it's 30-day public review period. The public notice was also posted at 3 locations including at the pond near the clubhouse, at the pond near the driving range, and at the entry of the Country Club outside of the gated entrance near the intersection of Big Canyon Drive and San Joaquin Hills Road. Photos of the posted notices were taken. Additionally, on March 4, 2001 15 copies of the complete MND and appendix were submitted to the State Clearinghouse as well as USFWS, USCOE, CDFDG, RWQCB, Caltrans, and the Coastal Commission (although site is not located in coastal zone). Consultation with regulatory agencies (i.e. CDFG & USCOE) have also occurred and is on file at the City. In compliance with State law and City procedures, the City has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental compliance for the proposed project. Therefore, the City will not cause to be prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). In compliance with Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Initial Study checklist form and explanation discussion format meets the requirements of the CEQA. Section 15063(d)(3) require that the entries on the Initial Study checklist identifying environmental effects are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries. An Initial Study may rely upon expert opinion supported by facts, technical studies or other substantial evidence to document its findings. An Initial Study is not intended nor required to include a level of detail which would provided in an EIR (Leonoff v. Monterey County Board of Supervisors (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1337). The IS/MND is not intended to be a lengthy detailed document. 3 Sewer Transmission Pipeline 1. Comment Since the City of Newport Beach does not have any jurisdiction or authority in regards to the sewer trunk line, what is Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) role in regards to the project, specifically the replacement of the sewer trunk line? Will OCSD be issuing a grading permit for replacement of the sewer trunk line? Approving CEQA compliance? 1. Response OCSD is planning to hire Big Canyon Country Club's Consultant, Waldon & Associates, through a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) between Waldon & OCSD to complete the design to replace a portion of OCSD's Big Canyon Trunk Sewer. The design will include obtaining any permits required to replace the sewer. OCSD typically does not obtain grading permits because OCSD constructs sewers in the public right of way, not private property. In this case, OCSD owns a public right of way easement through the Big Canyon Country Club (Golf Course). If a new alignment is required to avoid problems with the new storm drains, then OCSD assumes that the Big Canyon Country Club will grant OCSD a new easement. Also, OCSD expects that if the City of Newport Beach requires a grading permit for the new storm drains on private property owned by the Big Canyon Country Club, then the application for that permit would include grading provisions for any OCSD sewer. OCSD's Consultant will verify that the proper CEQA documentation/procedures have been performed in relation to OCSD's project. 2. Comment Are the sewer leaks in the project area and/or from the 1,100' segment to be replaced or the 7,500' entire length to be replaced per the strategic plan? 2. Response There are no sewer leaks (i.e. exfiltration) in the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer. Groundwater infiltration under pressure forces its way into the pipe, not the other way around. The project will replace a portion of the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer in conjunction with the area affected by the Big Canyon Pond Filling Project. The Big Canyon Trunk Sewer is scheduled to be rehabilitated, in the Strategic Plan, by 2009. The rehabilitation will be designed to correct any groundwater infiltration problems into OCSD's sewer. 3. Comment Is any untreated sewage being leaked (or discharged) to the groundwater beneath the Big Canyon Country Club & Golf Course? 3. Response There is no untreated sewage being leaked or discharged from OCSD's Big Canyon Trunk Sewer. 4 4. Comment What is the groundwater level within the project area (pond & sewer trankline)? 4. Response OCSD will investigate and determine the groundwater level during design. 5. Comment Is any remedial action to remove fecal or other materials from the area of the OCSD pipeline been previously done or now needed? 5. Response There are no fecal materials in the area of the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer caused by OCSD's sewer pipe. Fecal or other materials, including the water, cannot and do not exfiltrate out of the pipe in the Big Canyon area due to the constant hydraulic conditions of groundwater under pressure. 6. Comment What is the timing/schedule for replacement of the remaining 7,500' length of sewer trunkline? 6. Response Rehabilitation of the remaining Big Canyon Trunk Sewer is scheduled to be completed prior to 2009. 7. Comment What are the current and projected flow amounts in the sewer pipeline and is there appropriate capacity to determine accurately size the sewer line? 7. Response The current flow volume, projected flow volume, and capacity questions will be analyzed in the design phase. 8. Comment Is the sewer pipeline project identified per the City's or OCSD's CIP (Capital Improvement Program)? 8. Response Big Canyon Offsite Sewer Rehabilitation is included in OCSD's Capital Improvement Program. 5 Hydrology/Dr9nage 1. Comment The pipe system, as proposed, would only carry the flow that would result from a storm with about a 5-year frequency. 1. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. Per the April 2001 report, the drainage conveyance facilities are generally designed for 10-25 years flows based on hydrology criteria that existed at the time, with habitable structures protected against 100-year flows. 2. Comment By removing the existing pond, any peak -flow reduction associated with that lake will be eliminated, thus reducing the frequency storm that the existing drains can handle. 2. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. The existing pond outlet is a headwall/weir structure with a four -foot difference between top of weir and top of headwall with the ability to overflow downstream. Two separate drainage areas contribute to the pond with approximately 54% from the east and 46% from the southeast. Also see response to #3 below. 3. Comment The proposed undersized drainage system will cause the storm flows to back up, resulting in the formation of lake upstream from the proposed pipes. 3. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. The project will replicate the existing ponding and conveyance system as follows: • The southeast drainage, 46% of the total flow, can be ponded adjacent to the 18`h green in the existing inlet sump to a depth of approximately 7 feet. • The east drainage, 54% of the total flow, can be ponded at a headwall/weir inlet structure with a 5-foot differential between top of weir and top of headwall and the ability to overflow downstream. The overflow, should it occur, will be conducted downstream in a swale designed to accommodate the overflow and to protect any improvements or slopes adjacent to the swale. The maximum depth of any flow in this swale should be less than three feet. 4. Comment The undersized drainage system will create conditions resulting in the reduction of stability of the existing slopes along the stream upstream of the proposed construction. 0 4. Response See attached report dated April 2001 prepared by Walden & Associates. See response to #3 above. Biological Resources 1. Comment The biological assessment appears to have been conducted over a year ago and therefore now may be considered unreliable and cannot be used as a factual basis to -assess the project's impact. 1. Response The regulatory agencies (i.e. US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and California Department of Fish & Game (CDFG)) have reviewed the biological studies and have also conducted site inspections in addition to site assessments conducted by the biological resource consultant. The project applicant has commenced permit applications with these agencies in compliance with regulatory requirements including biological assessment and survey protocols. The applicant must obtain approval from these regulatory agencies prior to the City's issuance of a grading permit for the project. 2. Comment The need for updated and expanded field surveys is highlighted by the Lead Agency's recognition that "42 sensitive or special status species of animals and 21 sensitive or special status species of plants that occur with the general regional of the proposed project" could potentially exist on the project site. Since those species are never identified, it not possible to independent determine the potential presence of these unspecified species on or near the project site. If a "database search" was conducted, why was that information not included in technical appendix of the Revised Initial Study? Specifically what sensitive or specials status species were identified in that search? Are there any City, CDFG, or USFWS policies and/or procedures with regard to the currency of biological assessments? After what time period should a biological survey be updated to ensure that it accurately reflects current conditions and from what source is that determination derived? 2. Response The CEQA documentation includes a complete biological resources assessment. As stated previously the site is located within an existing private golf course. Existing residential development and golf course surround the site The Biological Resources study (page 2 and 5) identifies that a literature review included the California Natural Diversity Database and the California Native Plant Society's Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. Therefore, the source is cited that contains the listing of the sensitive or special status animal and plant species that occur in the general region of the project. The cited sources are available to the public. The comment incorrectly characterizes that the biological assessment study (page 4) identifies that these potential 7 0 sensitive or special status species could potentially exist on the project site. Page 4 of the biological study does not state that these species could potentially exist on the project site but rather states that the species "occur within the general region of the proposed project". In fact, the biology study goes on to clearly state that because of the lack of suitable habitat in the already existing development (a golf course), it not expected that any of these specials plants or animals are present at the proposed project site. 3. Comment The CDFG correspondence submitted to the City (dated June 26, 2000) indicates that the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and appendix containing the biological assessment is inadequate per CDFG. 3. Response The mitigation measures recommended for potential biological resource impacts are based on a professional expert biological assessment of the site. The mitigation measures are drafted in manner to ensure compliance, implementation, and verification. The habitat mitigation plan for wetlands is developed in consultation with the regulatory agencies that have jurisdiction over such resources. The mitigation must comply with state and federal laws. The project can't proceed forward until the City receives evidence identifying that the requirements of the regulatory agencies have been met. The project will comply with the legal requirements pertaining to the breeding season. The project applicant has applied for a CDFG Agreement and issuance of the Agreement is pending the City's completion of the CEQA compliance. As with any project subject to CDFG regulations and compliance, the CDFG reserves the right to require additional environmental documentation and/or adopt the subject CEQA document (IS/MND) for use in the consideration and issuance of a CDFG Agreement. As stated previously, the City will not issue a grading permit for the proposed project until required regulatory agency permits/agreements are obtained and evidence of said compliance is provided to the City. Golf Course Use 1. Comment Comments submitted to the City raise issues/questions pertaining to the expanded use of the golf course and impacts associated with the use of the golf course, including the putting green, expanded depth of the driving range, potential increase in club membership. 1. Response The proposed project is a private initiated project. The applicant is the Big Canyon Country Club. The project requires a grading permit from the City of Newport Beach. Therefore, the grading permit is subject to review, and approval or denial from the City Building Official. In compliance with State law and City procedures, the subject grading permit request and associated CEQA documentation does not require public hearings and/or meetings be held to consider the project. Additionally, the project (grading permit/CEQA 8 documentation) will not be subject to City Planning Commission review and/or City Council review. The City has conducted a thorough environmental review of the proposed grading permit request. A grading permit is required for the grading activities associated with the project. In addition to the City grading permit, the applicant must obtain approval of other various permits from numerous agencies prior to the commencement of grading/construction activities. For example the project will require review and approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), California Department of Fish & Game (CDFG), the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the water district. Without approval from these governmental entities that project will not be allowed to proceed. The CEQA document (IS/MND) was provided to these agencies for review and comment and no unavoidable adverse significant impacts were identified by these agencies. The City Planning Department has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate CEQA determination for the proposed project (grading permit request). The IS/MND disclosed information that was provided to the City by the project applicant that indicated that pond site (once filled) would potentially be utilized as a putting green area. Additional golf course improvements identified included relocation of the golf cart paths near the pond and expanding the depth of the driving range. The putting green area, increase depth of the driving range, relocation of golf cart paths etc. are allowable uses in compliance with the Big Canyon Country Club Planned Community. The CEQA documentation disclosed these potential uses for informational purposes only. These uses are permitted uses and do not require any discretionary permit approval beyond that previously approved in conjunction with the original plan and development of the golf course. Therefore, the project activities that are the subject of review and analyses of the CEQA document is the proposed grading permit only. Comments submitted to the City make reference to the expansion of the golf course and impacts associated with potential increase in golf course country club memberships. The Big Canyon Country Club membership is subject to the rules and regulations set forth in their By -Laws. Potential golf course uses of the pond area are disclosed since the project applicant provided this information to the City, however, these uses are allowed and permitted within the existing golf course property boundaries. Additionally, the project applicant indicated that algae have been a problem at the pond. The project applicant is under no obligation to provide alternative solutions for the possible algae problem. The applicant has requested a grading permit for the purposes of filling the pond and constructing associated drainage improvements. Public comments submitted to the City continue emphasis an issue with the use of the site as a putting green area and the modification of the driving range. These uses are permitted allowable uses and are not subject to the subject permit and the associated CEQA document prepared for the proposed grading permit. Although, the City appreciates the concerns expressed in regards to these potential golf course uses, these uses are not subject to the grading permit. Therefore, the project is not an expansion of the existing golf course. W, 0 MEMO 0 TO: Development Review Committee FROM: Christine Thayer DATE: July 3, 2001 RE: Development Review Committee Meeting Agenda The DRC Meeting is scheduled for this Thursday, July 5, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in the Planning Department Conference Room (upstairs). The agenda is as follows: AGENDA 9:00 a.m. —10:00 a.m. I Mr. Bob Wynn, 949-752-6923 Vacant property located directly A proposal to build a 17,460 sq. ft. Mormon temple with a east of existing LDS Church at seating capacity ofJ00 persons. The building will be 35 2150 Bonita Canyon Road. feet high with a foot tall steeple. The property is within the Bonita Canyon Planned Community designated for public/semi-public use�,4*� . ©�V, 7E Ss C�) CM Notes: P-�ow1.S �lgnnrilQQ�--�1 W,�rNs © �' �nulrenwvwd-'� �se5 S YiC !d ✓-akKy PIpN Vr k/.�C1U cl<kfb�� — Carc.,,ruwl Floor i'lar. a 5rab+�rl _PU-Q-1 P,t,y 'h 2 Kos�nrar4.ir..y (dlG., ekk%N�'� Env old t5��` U F:\Users\Pln\Shared\DRC-20�lUuly\7-05agn DRC.doe SPR r5. Supwler�-f-4-Q- �.le�C 'Dec, 949 44 9363 ,� / / 60 Cando JZ,Lkman Jun 21 00 04:19p CHAR S KLIEMRM M.D. U fz �� . w( w,�.C�,y,V �2�t-,ri - ✓ „ rev"`_',(\ � . 22 oG moor ati , X,,,portt E each., �G is 92660 G7eieph,w 949-6-0-4-9546 ,Tax 94,9-644-96+7 Jun 21 00 04:19p CHRRLES 00/21/00 10:05 FAX 949 955 9* KLIEMRM M.D. 949464 9363 PAONE CALLAHAN 0 009 p.2 er..r,.c. rcl.DeoTr MAwTIM L. LLC ROxA w ♦,W�LwG' .lOICRw xANLDA� c..ww LLD e. ,. NONALM R. WANT OL.D w ONALD A. NAwTwRNr" DLNIn, D. Ioc.• Owxe Orr A. LCw •AUR .00MM 1. r[rARA 'ID AOr.TT[] IF A..1]DrA LAW 0-Flec6 FELDSGTT. LEE & FRINBERG a UR VaR.RLRlM1a IRCLYYIwD 1'a0f[]llOwaL CYwrORwileMa A ew,C RLAS eu1T, a00 wcwwORIT ■LwON. CAL1rOw M1A 0]w10 le.el Tao-R40R r.ee.rgL IR.RI iiheols MAY 0 8 HE[- a'J! AMOZ IJY �r Ie00 AVC4JC Of Tu[ prAe. ]e•- rLODw Lvs -roue], en OOOeT V l4iUwA CGV N�� i0o C..a- is RLA+APc owlVC Ault, 000 Oxn.R�. GAL.rO-..,w G>ODe Ia0]I ee-3.w- LC..ru. u0]I eee'OPD May 5.2000 ,N .rnu.rlDr r.r� rx,NR,wO. D... T. 4.NRon c LIT- Re]...ewT. Tx...vA r.• .Ae vcou. revwOA Jo.ae I70R1 R.T-.eDD BrettWilliamson RaCRIN,Lc O0i1 e.T Ae01 O'Melveny & Meyers, LLP 670 Newport Center Drive, 1701 Floor Newport Beach, California 92660 Re: Bin Can on Community Association pear Mr. Williamson: This office serves as legal counsel to both Canyon Hills Community Association and Big Canyon Master Association_ We have been asked to contact you on behalf of both Boards of Directors regarding several conditions that the country club has caused. and which are addressed in detail herein. Prior to drafting this letter, we made an independent inspection of the property and an extensive review of the 1974 Grant Deed, which includes many covenants which favor both homeowners associations and obligate the country club in regard thereto. 1, TH• E LAKE To begin, we understand that the country club is considering the removal of the lake adjacent to the putting greens and the stream which runs along the driving range. As you probably realize, the grant deed specifically requires the country club to obtain consent from the members of canyon Hills Community Association prior to modifying the configuration or location of any lakes located on the driving range from the state the takes were in atthe time the deed was executed. A review of areal maps and investigation regarding previous modificationstothe lakes have disclosed that there was a large lake on the driving range that no longer exists. Apparently, the country club moved the lake to its present condition. This was done without the consent of the Canyon Hills Community Association's members. We understand that it is now the desire of the country, club to remove this lake altogether. Please be informed that should the country club decide to follow through with this plan, the association has authorized this office to review the association's options which would undoubtedly include filing suit in order to obtain an injunction prohibiting this action. Thus, we hereby request that you inform this office of your intentions at this time. Jun 21 00 04:19p CHARLES KLIEMRN M.D. 949 G44 9363 06/21/00 13:05 PAX 949 955 9000 PAONE CALLAHAN • Idi004 p.3 FELbSrJTT, LEE S FEINDERG May 5.2000 Page -3- 2. THENEDGE It is apparent when driving along Big Canyon Drive that the homeowners have lost the view of the golf course which was a large factor in the price of their homes. This view has been lost because the country club has relocated hedges within a restricted setback area and because the hedges have been allowed to grow to great heights. I realize that in your April 13, 2000letterto Martin Greenbaum, Esq.. regarding this subject, you requested a detailed breakdown of the violations. 1 believe that this is altogether unnecessary' in•that if anyone took the time to drive up Big Canyon Drive they would see that the violations are obvious and widespread. in regard to natural fencing, the grant deed states as follows: "...there shall not be constructed any fencing, walls or the like whether living or inert materials (herein "enclosures'), upon the property conveyed hereby which unreasonable obstructs the view of the golf course upon the property conveyed hereby (herein the "golf course) of "contiguous owners" (as defined in paragraph (ii) hereof) or from contiguous streets. The question of reasonableness of enclosures is to be determined in light of the desire of contiguous owners to enjoy reasonably unobstructed view of the golf course and in light of the Grantee's desire to limit vehicular and pedestrian access to the Grantee's golf course, to protect against flying bails, and to provide physical separation between ceratin greens. tees and fairways." The grant deed includes several attachments which include descriptions and drawings depicting the limitations on the height of the trees as wail as the setback requirements. it is hereby demanded that the shrubs be trimmed and/or removed in order to bring the property into compliance. 3. THE CART TURN"AROUND One must wonder howthe cart turn -around could have been constructed without full knowledge that the construction was an encroachment on the master association's property and constitutes a wWul trespass. The cart turn -around comes clear up to Big Canyon Drive just past Rue Fountainebieau and practically abuts the gutter. The encroachment doe's not allow room for landscaping as was originally provided. It is hereby requested that the cart turn -around be removed. n 0 PLANNING DEPTARTMENT CITY HALL 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD P. O. BOX 1768 NEWPORT BCH, CALIFORNIA 926SM915 A To. Cheryle Hodge From: Chris Thayer, Dept. Assistant Fax: (949) 661-3791 Pages: 20 (including cover sheet) Phone: (949) 661-6488 Date: 05/22/2001 Re: Big Canyon By -Laws & Mtg info CC: ❑ Urgent O For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle • Comments: Cheryle, The meeting with Jay & the City Attorney (Robin) is scheduled for this Friday, May 2511 from 9:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. in the Planning Dept. Please acknowledge that you receive this 20 page fax also reference Big Canyon By -Laws. Thanks, Chris 949-644-3200 SNYDER LANGSTON May 15, 2001 Mr. Javier Garcia, AICP Planning Department City of Newport Beach Post Office Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658 RE: Big Canyon Permit Dear Jay: Enclosed please find the Big Canyon by-laws regarding membership numbers, correspondence with the Department of Fish & Game and the response to Hydrological Study. Please accept my apologies for the delay. Please advise if I can be of further assistance. Thank you. Sincerely, /Bill Langston WELlcn Enclosures Creating Value Through Leadership in Real Estate and Construction 17962 Cowan, Irvine, California 92614 Phone 949.863.9200 Fax 949 863,1007 w ..snyder.Ian gston.com DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND -GAME Leslie S. MacNair Habitat Conservation Planning Division - Region 5 P.O. Box 6907 Laguna Niguel, CA 92607 July 28, 2000 Mr. Bill Langston Big Canyon Country Club 1 Big Canyon Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dear Mr. Langston: Enclosed is a copy of the Streambed Alteration Agreement 5-169-00 If you agree with the conditions/measures set forth in the agreement, please make a copy, sign both copies, and return both to our office for signature, at the above address. Written notice of your intent to commence project activities needs to be provided to the Department at least five days in advance of commencing project activities. The California Fish and Game Code requires that you notify the Department in writing within 14 days of receipt of this Proposal as to its acceptability. If you do not respond within this time period you will lose your right'to request binding arbitration. For minor changes we suggest you contact the person responsible for writing your agreement prior to sending the written response. Please be advised the Department cannot execute (sign) your Streambed Alteration Agreement without your certified CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) document, Notice of Determination (NOD), Findings, and proof of having paid the CEQA document filing fee, and this Agreement is subject to change upon receipt and review of your certified CEQA documents. If the project was determined to be exempt under CEQA by the lead agency, please provide a copy of the Notice of Exemption or other appropriate documentation. If you have any questions regarding the proposed conditions please contact me at (949) 583-0943. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Leslie S. MacNair Environmental Specialist III Habitat Conservation Planning, Region 5 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT FISH AND GAME •, 4949 Viewridge Avenue San Diego, California 92123 Notification No. 5-169-00 July 28, 2000 Page 1 of 5 AGREEMENT REGARDING PROPOSED STREAM OR LAKE ALTERATION THIS AGREEMENT, entered into between the State of California, Department of Fish and Game, hereinafter called the Department, and Mr. Bill Langston of Big Canyon Country Club, 1 Big Canyon Drive Newport Beach CA 92660: (949)-644-5404, State of California, hereinafter called the Operator, is as follows: WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1603 of California Fish and Game Code, the Operator, on the 30th day of June, 2000, notified the Department that they intend to divert or obstruct the natural flow of, or change the bed, channel, or,bank of, or use material from the streambed(s) of, the following water(s): Big Canyon Creek tributary to Upper Newport Bay, Orange County, California; USGS Map: Laguna Beach; Orange County Assessor's Parcel Number: 442-032-069; Section:56, Range: 10W, Township:6S;. WHEREAS, the Department (represented by Christi McCoy and Leslie S. MacNair through a site visit on 28 January 2000, and subsequent information) has determined that such construction may substantially adversely affect those existing fish and wildlife resources within the Big Canyon Creek, triNitnry to Unner Newport Bev. specifically identified as follows: Amphibians: Pacific tree frog; THEREFORE, the Department hereby proposes measures to protect fish and wildlife resources during the Operator's work. The Operator hereby agrees to accept the following measures/conditions as part of the proposed work. If the Operator's work changes from that stated in the notification specified above, this Agreement is no longer valid and a new notification shall be submitted to the Department of Fish and Game. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement and with other pertinent code sections, including but not limited to Fish and Game Code Sections 5650, 5652, 5937, and 5948, may result in prosecution. Nothing in this Agreement authorizes the Operator to trespass on any land or property, nor does it relieve the Operator of responsibility for compliance with applicable federal, state, or local laws or ordinances. A consummated Agreement does not constitute Department of Fish'and.Game endorsement of the proposed operation, or assure the Department's concurrence with permits required from other agencies. These Conditions become effective the date of Department's signature and terminates necessary to satisfy the terms/conditions (including mitigation) of this Agreement. Any provisions of the agreement may be amended at any time provided such amendment is agreed to in writing by both parties. Mutually approved amendments become part of the original agreement and are subject to all previously negotiated provisions. Page 2 of 5 (July 28, 20000 STREAMBED ALTERATION CONDITIONS FOR NOTIFICATION NUMBER: 5-169-00 1. The following provisions constitute the limit of activities agreed to and resolved by this Agreement. The signing of this Agreement does not imply that the Operator is precluded from doing other activities at the site. However, activities not specifically agreed to and resolved by this Agreement shall be subject to separate notification pursuant to Fish and Game Code Sections 1600 et seq. 2. The Operator proposes to alter the streambed for the placement of the above -ground creek and pond in underground drainage system. Currently the pond inlets into underground pipes, runs underground, and outlets downstream into another lake. The proposed drainage pipes will be connected to these existing pipes that are located at the downstream end of the pond. Fill material will be placed in the creek and pond for the expansion of the existing driving range. The project will permanently impact the pond (0.64 acre), the stream (0.03 acre) that outlets into the pond, and approximately an additional 0,10 acre of wetland vegetation associated with the pond. Total impacts to streambed and associated habitat total 0.77 acre. This creek and pond receive water upstream from the Big Canyon Reservoir and represents a natural stream that has been modified over the years. The stream has been placed in underground pipes in numerous locations upstream and downstream of this project to accommodate development. The stream ultimately drains into the Upper Newport Bay. 3. The agreed work includes activities associated with No. 2 above. The project area is located in the Big Canyon Creek, tributary to Upper Newport Bay in Orange County. Specific work areas and mitigation measures are described on/in the plans and documents submitted by the Operator, and including the "Draft Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration," Prepared by: Hodge & Associates dated May 26, 2000, shall be implemented as proposed unless directed differently by this agreement. 4. The Operator shall not impact more than 0.77 acre of stream/pond and associated habitat. A total of 0.67 acre is openwater habitat and 0.10 acre is wetland vegetation. All impacts are permanent. 5, The Operator shall mitigate for permanent impacts to openwater and wetland habitat as follows: (A) create 0.67 acre of openwater habitat at a Department approved location on -site; and (B) create/restore 0.20 acre of wetland habitat (2:1 replacement -to -impact ratio) at a X Department approved location on -site. All mitigation shall be completed by November 1, 2000. 6. All trees which need to be removed shall be boxed and relocated to the mitigation area on -site for transplanting. The transplanting of trees shall be done by a certified arborist. The transplant site shall be included in the mitigation plan and approved by the Department prior to commencing project activities. Any trees not successfully transplanted shall be replaced in -kind at a 3:1 ratio (except for oaks and sycamores which shall be mitigated as described below in Condition 7 of this Agreement). An inventory shall be submitted that describes the number, by species, of trees boxed for transplant and removed/destroyed. All transplanted trees shall be monitored for five years after they were transplanted. The monitoring results shall be included in annual monitoring report. 7. Any oaks and sycamores which must be damaged/removed shall be replaced in -kind at a Department approved location. The replacement ratios for oaks/sycamores which are to be damaged/removed shall be as follows: plants less than 5 inches DBH shall be replaced at 3:1; plants from 5 to 12 inches shall be replaced at 5:1, and trees from 12 up to 36 inches shall be replaced at 10:1; and all trees 36 inches or greater shall be replanted at a ratio of 20:1. The Department recommends that the Operator use rooted plants in liners, acorns, or one gallon containers for restoration to increase the likelihood of survival of plantings. Page 3 of 5 (July 28, 20000 0 STREAMBED ALTERATION CONDITIONS FOR NOTIFICATION NUMBER: 5-169-00 8. Prior to the initiation of any project activities and no later than 90 days after signature to this agreement, the Operator shall submit to the Department for review and approval a mitigation plan designed to meet the identified objectives described in Conditions 5, 6, and 7 of this Agreement. The plan shall include mitigation site location, detailed plant palette, planting plan, monitoring and maintenance procedures/timeline, irrigation, success standards and contingency measures, description of plans to prevent the invasion of undesirable weeds for a minimum of five years. Project activities may commence upon, but not before, written Department approval of the Operator's mitigation plan. 9. The Operator shall not remove vegetation from within the stream and/or pond from March 1 to August 15 to avoid impacts to nesting birds. 10. Disturbance or removal of vegetation shall not exceed the limits approved by the Department. The temporarily disturbed portions of any stream channel shall be restored. Restoration shall include the revegetation of stripped or exposed areas with vegetation native to the area. 11. All planting shall have a minimum of 80% survival the first year and 100% survival thereafter and/or shall attain 75% cover after 3 years and 90% cover after 5 years for the life of the project, If the survival and cover requirements have not been met, the Operator is responsible for replacement planting to achieve these requirements. Replacement plants shall be monitored with the same survival and growth requirements for 5 years after planting. 12. All planting shall be done between October 1 and April 30 to take advantage of the winter rainy season. 13. An annual report shall be submitted to the Department by May 1 of each year for 5 years after planting. This report shall include the survival, % cover, and height of both tree and shrub species. The number by species of plants replaced, an overview of the revegetation effort, and the method used to assess these, parameters shall also be included. Photos from designated photo stations shall be included. 14. The perimeter of the work site shall be adequately flagged to prevent damage to adjacent riparian habitat. No equipment shall be operated within the stream. 15. No equipment shall be operated in ponded or flowing areas. When work in a flowing stream is unavoidable, the entire stream flow shall be diverted around the work area by a barrier, temporary culvert, new channel, or other means approved by the Department. Construction of the barrier and/or the new channel shall normally begin in the downstream area and continue in an upstream direction, and the flow shall be diverted only when construction of the diversion is completed. Channel bank or barrier construction shall be adequate to prevent seepage into or from the work area. Channel banks or barriers shall not be made of earth or other substances subject to erosion unless first enclosed by sheet piling, rock riprap, or other protective material. The enclosure and the supportive material shall be removed when the work is completed and removal shall normally proceed from downstream in an upstream direction. The Operator shall obtain all written approvals from the Department prior to initiation of construction activities, 16. Installation of bridges, culverts, or other structures shall be such that water flow is not impaired. Bottoms of temporary culverts shall be placed at stream channel grade; bottoms of permanent culverts shall be placed at or below stream channel grade. 17, Any equipment or vehicles driven and/or operated within or adjacent to the stream/lake shall be checked and maintained daily, to prevent leaks of materials that if introduced to water could be deleterious to aquatic life. Page 4 of 6 (July 28, 200010' STREAMBED ALTERATION CONDITIONS 0 FOR NOTIFICATION NUMBER: 5-169-00 18. Staging/storage areas for equipment and materials shall be located outside of the stream. 19. Access to the work site shall be via existing roads and access ramps. 20. Raw cement/concrete or washings thereof, asphalt, paint or other coating material, oil or other petroleum products, or any other substances which could be hazardous to aquatic life, resulting from project related activities, shall be prevented from contaminating the soil and/or entering the waters of the state. These materials, placed within or where they may enter a stream/lake, by Operator or any party working under contract, or with the permission of the Operator, shall be removed immediately. 21. No debris, soil, silt, sand, bark, slash, sawdust, rubbish, cement or concrete or washings thereof, oil or petroleum products or other organic or earthen material (except for backfill) from any construction, or associated activity of whatever nature shall be allowed to enter into or placed where it may be washed by rainfall or runoff into, waters of the State. When operations are completed, any excess materials or debris shall be removed from the work area. No rubbish shall be deposited within 150 feet of the high water mark of any stream or lake. 22. No equipment maintenance shall be done within or near any stream channel where petroleum products or other pollutants from the equipment may enter these areas under any flow. 23. The Operator shall comply with all litter and pollution laws. All contractors, subcontractors and employees shall also obey these laws and it shall be the responsibility of the operator to ensure compliance. 24, The Operator shall request an extension of this agreement prior to its termination. Extensions may be granted for up to 12 months from the date of termination of the agreement and are subject to Departmental approval. The extension request and fees shall be submitted to the Department's Region 5 Office Streambed Team at 4949 Viewridge Avenue, San Diego, California 92123. If the Operator fails to request the extension prior to the agreement's termination then the Operator shall submit a new notification with fees and required information to the Department. Any activities conducted under an expired agreement is a violation of Fish and Game Code Section 1600 et. seq. The Operator may request up to a maximum of 2 extensions of this agreement. 25. The Operator shall provide a copy of this Agreement to all contractors, subcontractors, and the Operator's project supervisors. Copies of the Agreement shall be readily available at work sites at all times during periods of active work and must be presented to any Department personnel, or personnel from another agency upon demand. 26. The Department reserves the right to enter th'e project site.at any time to ensure compliance with terms/conditions of this Agreement. 27. The Operator shall notify the Department, in writing, at least five (5) days prior to initiation of construction (project) activities and at least five (5) days prior to completion of construction (project) activities. Notification shall be sent to the Department at 4949 Viewridge Avenue, San Diego, CA 92123, Attn: Streambed Team SAA # 5-169-00. 28. The Department reserves the right to suspend or cancel this Agreement for other reasons, including but not limited to the following: a. The Department determines that the information provided by the Operator in support of the Notification/Agreement is incomplete or inaccurate; b. The Department obtains new information that was not known to it in preparing the terms and conditions of the Agreement; Page 5 of 5 (July 28, 2000)* • STREAMBED ALTERATION CONDITIONS FOR NOTIFICATION NUMBER: 5-169-00 c. The project or project activities as described in the Notification/Agreement have changed; d. The conditions affecting fish and wildlife resources change or the Department determines that project activities will result in a substantial adverse effect on the environment. CONCURRENCE (Operator's name) (signature) (date) Print Name and Title Streambed Alteration Agreen California Dept. of Fish and Game (signature) (date) C F Rayshrnok. Reoional Manager Transmittal Form Archives http://intra.psomas.com/project/transmittal/Lransprint.cfm?tbid=205i P S O M A S 11444West Olympic Blvd, Suite 750WestLos Angeles, CA90064.1549310.954-3700310-954-3777Fax Date: 8-3.00 Job No. 2BIG0101 Project: Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain Project To: Mr. Bill Langston SNYDER LANGSTON 17962 Cowan Irvine, CA 92614 a—'^.. �-e,�q``c`"r•,I 71a ppaS`t t ^..S:t f t3 tm,� 1 V � ��ti'.' ri ;�;..' i +�'e�,n�' .a.a,....,S a .w ,id• �IN '1i I y!-M .� Ka `,r „ �r ; pafi � ,o ` tr''»,a LR71@, e r a n Per Your Request [i Mail Cl Approval [I Acknowledge d Enclosed R1 Overnight Review and Comment [_J Return Enclosures J'j Under separate cover Cl UPS ["J Distribution ® Respond By: ❑ Prints O-Messenger ❑ Information/Files © Transparencies 0 Hand 0 Signature 0 Specifications 0 Fed Ex 171 Diskettes Fax ❑ FTP / E-Mail Enclosures: (If enclosures are not as noted, please inform us Streambed Alteration Agreement 7/28/00 Enclosed for your review and signature (if acceptable) is the Streambed Alteration Agreement drafted by the Department of Fish and Game. Edith, Jerry and I are reviewing it as well. Please call me if you have any comments or would like to request that any changes be made. Likewise, I will contact you if we feel any revisions are necessary. PLEASE NOTE THAT WE HAVE 14 DAYS TO NOTIFY DFG IF THIS AGREEMENT IS ACCEPTABLE (UNTIL AUGUST 16th). Jennifer 044_ Issued By: Jennifer Kurlak Vic Copies To: With Enclosures: Mr. David Voorhees, Big Canyon Country Club 1 of 1 8/3100 9:39 AM information and Engineering Solutions August 16, 2000 Via Mail and Fax (949)583-0943 Ms. Leslie S. MacNair Habitat Conservation Planning Division — Region 5 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 4949 Viewridge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 Re: Streambed Alteration Agreement 5-169-OOBig Canyon Country Club (1BIG0101) Dear Leslie: This letter is to briefly summarize our conversation this morning and document the revisions to be made to the above -referenced Streambed Alteration Agreement for the Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain project. It is our understanding that the following conditions of the Agreement will be revised: • Condition 5 will be revised to state: "All mitigation shall be completed by October 31, 200$ " This is due to the fact that we are still awaiting certification of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and issuance of permits from other agencies, specifically the Regional Water Quality Control Board and Army Corps of Engineers, as required to proceed with the proposed project. Consequently, it is not feasible to complete the mitigation by November 1, 2000. • Condition 12 will be revised to state that the Department "recommends" that planting be done between October 1 and April 30 to take advantage of the winter rainy season. If planting is done outside this timeframe, irrigation and maintenance measures, etc. must be addressed in the mitigation plan. In addition, we confirmed that project activities can commence concurrent with mitigation activities, as long as written approval of the Operator's mitigation plan has been obtained from the Department (Condition 8). Your continued assistance is greatly appreciated. We look forward to receiving the revised Agreement from you shortly. 3187 Red Hill Avenue Suite258 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714751.7373 714545.8883 fax .- M.osomas com P S O M A S Ms. Leslie S. MacNair Page 2 August 16, 2000 (1BIG0101) If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, PSOMAS Jennifer Kurlak Project Manager JK:jk cc: Bill Langston, Snyder Langston David Voorhees, Big Canyon Country Club Jerry King, Psomas • 18012 CAN, SUITE 210 • IRVINE, CA 92614 *LDEN & 949/660-0110 FMC- 660-0418 S S 0 C IATE S CIVIL ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - LAND SURVEYORS RESPONSE TO HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES DRAINAGE REPORT — APRIL 2001 Drainage conveyance facilities are generally designed for 10-25 year flows based on hydrology criteria that existed at the time, with habitable structures protected against 100-year flows. The existing pond is maintained at equilibrium with outflows equaling inflows in a flowby condition. The existing pond outlet is a headwall/weir structure with a four -foot difference between top of weir and top of headwall with the ability to overflow downstream. Two separate drainage areas contribute to this pond with approximately 54% from the east and 46% from the southeast. The proposed plan will replicate the existing ponding and conveyance system as follows: The southeast drainage, 46% of the total flow, can be ponded adjacent to the eighteenth green in the existing inlet sump to a depth of approximately 7 feet. The east drainage, 54% of the total flow, can be ponded at a headwall/weir inlet structure with a 5-foot differential between top of weir and top of headwall and the ability to overflow downstream. The overflow, should it occur, will be conducted downstream in a Swale designed to accommodate the overflow and to protect any improvements or slopes adjacent to the Swale. The maximum depth of any flow in this swale should be less than three feet. All habitable structures will be protected against 100-year flows. The proposed Project will be permitted under existing codes of the City of Newport Beach, after the plans have been thoroughly checked by professional engineers of the City of Newport Beach staff. The design and construction will follow best management practices. F:\WORDDOCS\DLVP=ponse - drainage report 4.01.doe Big Canyon Country Club* By -Laws TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS 2 ARTICLE 2: DIRECTORS 2 ARTICLE 3: OFFICERS 12 ARTICLE 4: MEMBERSHIP 16 ARTICLE 5: MEETINGS OF REGULAR MEMBERS 39 ARTICLE 6: DUES, ASSESSMENTS AND INDEBTEDNESS 42 ARTICLE 7: DISCIPLINE 44 ARTICLE 8: GUESTS 48 ARTICLE 9: COMMITTEES 48 ARTICLE 10: MISCELLANEOUS 50 ARTICLE 11: AMENDMENTS TO BY-LAWS 52 ARTICLE 12: ARBITRATION 53 • • ARTICLE 4: MEMBERSHIP NUMBER 4A NUMBER OF MEMBERS The membership of the Club shall consist of eleven (11) classes, to wit: Regular, Regular Associate, Select Associate, Emeritus, Golf Associate, Social, Social Associate, Non -Resident, Junior, Class A and Honorary. The Board is authorized to issue mem- bership in those classes in numbers not to exceed the following: (a) Regular 500 (b) Regular Associate 30 (c) Select Associate 19 (d) Emeritus 20 (e) Golf Associate Open (f) Social *325 (g) Social Associate (h) Non -Resident 30 (i) Junior 60 (j) Class A Memberships shall be created and affected only as provided in Section 4.8 below. (k) Honorary -Memberships may be issued pursuant to Section 4.9 below. *The combined total!of Social and Social Associate Membership shall not exceed 325 CLASSES 4.2 REGULAR MEMBERS Only persons at least twenty-one (21) years of age shall be eligi- ble for Regular Membership. Regular Members may enjoy all the privileges of the Club. Regular Memberships are propri- etary, voting, assessable, transferable and do not terminate upon death. The transfer rights and responsibilities of Regular Memberships sponsored by a corporation and the sponsoring corporation shall be determined in accordance with those portions of the By- 16- Los they existed on August 31, 1984, which we* forth on Exhibit A thereto and by this reference made a part of this Article 4. For the purposes of determining the number of Regular Memberships outstanding, the number of Regular Memberships sponsored by a corporation from time to time out- standing shall be counted as Regular Memberships. From and after September 1, 1984 there shall be no additional Regular Memberships sponsored by a corporation issued by the Club. 4.2.1 EMERITUS MEMBERS A Regular Member who is at least eighty (80) years of age and has been a Regular Member in good standing for at least fifteen (15) years and who sells his Regular Membership shall be eligi- ble for Emeritus Membership; and if such Regular Member desires to acquire an Emeritus Membership, he shall soindicate at the time he notifies the Secretary of the Club of his desire to sell his Regular Membership. A Regular Member who is eligi- ble for, and desires to acquire, an Emeritus Membership shall not be required to make application for such membership in accordance with Section 4,14 hereof. An Emeritus Membership shall be non-proprietary, non -voting, non -assessable and non- transferable and shall terminate upon death of the Emeritus Member; provided, however, that the surviving spouse of an Emeritus Member may retain membership privileges as a Golf Associate Member under Section 4.3 hereof or a Social Associate Member under Section 4.5 hereof upon payment of such fees as may be established from time to time by the Board of Directors. An Emeritus Member shall be entitled to all privi- leges, including golfing privileges, of the Club for the Emeritus Member's lifetime. Membership dues for an Emeritus Member shall be at the same rate as a Regular Member's, and any initia- tion fee to become an Emeritus Member shall be established from time to time by the Board of Directors. The number of Emeritus Memberships shall at no time exceed the number as may be authorized by the Board of Directors, which number shall at no time be in excess of twenty (20). The Board of Directors shall have the authority, exercised by the Board or by the Membership Committee, from time to time as it may deem -17- 00priate, to establish procedures and guideline* the sale of the Regular Memberships of eligible Regular Members who desire to acquire an Emeritus Membership. 4.3 GOLF ASSOCIATE MEMBERS Only persons who are surviving spouses of Regular, Regular Associate, Non -Resident, Select Associate, or Emeritus Members are eligible for Golf Associate Membership; provided, however, that those persons who were Single Lady Members on August 31, 1984 shall automatically become Golf Associate Members. Golf Associate Memberships are non-proprietary, non -voting, non -assessable, non -transferable and terminate on death, marriage or re -marriage, Transferees who are the surviv- ing spouses of Non -Resident Members shall continue to have limited golfing privileges as stated in Section 4.6 hereof. 4.4 SOCIAL MEMBERS Only persons at least twenty-one (21) years of age shall be eligi- ble for Social Membership. Social Members shall enjoy all the privileges of the Club except those of playing golf and sponsor- ing guests to play golf. Social Memberships are non-proprietary, non -voting, non -assessable, non -transferable and terminate upon death (except is set forth in Section 4.25.2 hereof). A Social Member who has been such for one (1) year or less may elect to convert his Social Membership to a Regular Membership with- out the necessity of making application for Regular Membership as provided in Section 4.14 hereof, and shall automatically be considered an Accepted Applicant for Regular Membership within the meaning of Section 4.17 hereof. A Social Member who has been such for more than one (1) year and who wishes to convert his Social Membership to a Regular Membership must make application for Regular Membership in accordance with Section 4.14 hereof, Upon becoming an Accepted Applicant for Regular Membership in accordance with Section 4.17 hereof, a Social Member shall receive credit toward the Regular Membership purchase price in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) the amount of initiation fee paid for his Social Membership, or (b) an amount equal to the transfer fee which, Or such credit, would be collected from the pros of the sale of the Regular Membership purchased by him. 4.5 SOCIAL ASSOCIATE MEMBERS Only persons who are surviving spouses of Regular, Regular Associate, Non -Resident, Social, Select Associate, or Emeritus Members are eligible for Social Associate Membership. Social Associate Memberships are non-proprietary, non -voting, non - assessable, non -transferable and terminate on death or remar- riage. 4.6 NON-RESIDENT MEMBERS Only persons at least twenty-one (21) years of age who maintain their primary personal residence in counties other than the fol- lowing are eligible for Non -Resident Membership: Ventura, Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino and Imperial Counties. For this purpose, a person's primary person- al residence shall be that residence which such person has occu- pied for more calendar months in the two (2) years preceding such person's application for membership than any other resi- dence, and which is intended by such person to be his primary personal residence. Non -Resident Members may enjoy all the privileges of the Club; provided, however, that Non -Resident Members who lease or occupy a second residence within any of the counties named above shall be restricted to twenty (20) rounds of golf per year for himself and twenty (20) rounds of golf per year for his spouse or other eligible family members. Non -Resident Memberships are non- proprietary, non -voting, non -assessable, non- transferable, and terminate at death (except as set forth in Section 4,25.1 hereof). Upon establish- ing his primary personal residence in the above listed Southern California counties, a Non -Resident Member who wishes to become a Regular Member shall, within ninety (90) days there- after, make application to the Club for Regular Membership in accordance with Section 4.14 hereof. If the Non -Resident Member becomes an Accepted Applicant for Regular 19- Obership in accordance with Section 4.17 hereot at that time there are no Regular Memberships available to him, his name shall be placed upon the waiting list of Accepted Applicants for Regular Membership. Such Non -Resident Member may retain his status as a Non -Resident Member until such time as he is inducted as a Regular Member, provided, however, that such a Non -Resident Member may continue his status only after depositing with the Club an amount equal to one-fourth (1/4) of the purchase price for the last Regular Membership sold. Such deposit shall not be refundable, but in the event such Non -Resident Member is inducted to Regular Membership, such deposit shall be applied toward the purchase price required to be paid at the time of the induction. In addi- tion to the aforementioned deposit, a Non -Resident Member shall receive credit toward the Regular Membership purchase price in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) the initiation fee paid for such Non -Resident Membership, or (b) an amount equal to the transfer fee which, but for such initiation fee credit, would be collected from the proceeds of the sale of the Regular Membership purchased by him. During the period of time said Non -Resident Member is on the waiting list of Accepted Applicants for Regular Membership, he shall pay Regular Member dues and receive all privileges of the Club accorded a Regular Member (except the right to vote) but he shall be counted as a Non -Resident Member for the purpose of deter- mining the number of Non -Resident members then outstanding. In the event such Non -Resident member fails to make such deposit or fails to perform such acts as are required by these By - Laws for induction to Regular Membership after a Regular Membership is made available to him, his Non -Resident Membership together with all Club privileges shall thereupon terminate. 4.7 JUNIOR MEMBERS Only persons at least twenty-one (21) years of age who have not reached their forty-fourth (44th) birthday shall be eligible to 20 - pose a Junior Membership. All Junior Membersioare non-proprietary, non -voting, non -assessable, non -transferable and terminate upon death. Sons and daughters of Regular Members in good standing shall have priority over other appli- cants for Junior Memberships. The total number of Junior Members shall not exceed sixty (60). For purposes of determin- ing the number of Junior Memberships outstanding, the number of persons holding Select Associate Memberships from time to time outstanding shall not be counted as Junior Members. From and after September 1, 1984, there shall be no new Associate Memberships (other than Golf Associate, Regular Associate or Social Associate Memberships) issued by the Club. The rights, privileges and responsibilities of Associate Members shall be determined in accordance with Section 4.6 of the By - Laws as they existed on August 31, 1984, a copy of which is attached thereto as Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part of this Article 4. The rights, privileges and responsibilities of Junior Members who have purchased their Junior Membership before January 1, 1997, and who elect not to be governed by these By -Laws, shall be determined in accordance with Section 4.6 of the By -Laws as they existed on October 31, 1996, a copy of which is attached thereto as Exhibit A and by this reference is made a part of this Article 4, Upon reaching his thirtieth (30th) birthday, any Junior Member or any Junior Member who, upon admission to the Club, has reached his thirtieth (30th) birthday, shall pay the same monthly dues required to be paid by Regular Members. A Junior Member who wishes to become a Regular Member must make application for Regular Membership in accordance with Section 4.14 hereof and become an Accepted Applicant for Regular Membership in accordance with Section 4.17 hereof. In the event such Junior Member fails to perform such acts as required by these By -Laws for induction to Regular Membership -21. Vor before his forty-fifth (45th) birthday, his Junior Membership, together with all Club privileges shall thereupon terminate. A Junior Member who resigns his Junior Membership without purchasing a Regular Membership shall not be entitled to a refund of the initiation fee paid for such membership, but shall be entitled to a refund of all other sums deposited by him pursuant to this Section 4.7, without interest. A Junior Member who purchases a Regular Membership shall receive a credit toward the purchase price of the Regular Membership in an amount equal to the sum of the initiation fee he paid for his Junior Membership, all deposits made by him pursuant to this Section 4.7, and all interest credited on the deposits made by him pursuant to this Section 4.7. If the sum of his initiation fee and his deposits (exclusive of interest cred- its) exceeds the purchase price of the Regular Membership pur- chased by him, such excess shall be refunded to him, without interest. A Junior Member who shall become a Regular Member pur- suant to the procedures set forth in Section 4.24 shall be enti- tled to apply all or any portion of the initiation fee he has paid for -his Junior Membership and all deposits made by him pur- suant to this Section 4.7 toward any initiation fee or charges payable under Section 4.24 and if the sum of his initiation fee and deposits (exclusive of interest credits) exceeds any initiation fees, deposits or charges to be paid under Section 4.24, such excess shall be refunded to him, without interest. In order to remain in good standing, each Junior Member who purchases his Junior Membership on or after January 1, 1997, shall, in addition to his initiation fee (which fee shall be in an amount and payable from time to time as is determined by the Board), be required to make annual deposits with the Club in an amount sufficient to establish and thereafter maintain a deposit balance as specified in the following schedule ("Junior Member Financing Schedule"): 22 - 0 Garcia, Jay From: Unity Messaging System - EXCHANGE2_MIS Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 3:36 PM To: Garcia, Jay Subject: Message from Bill Langston I}� VolceMessage Membership number DFG Communication Flood Study information 05/14/2001 13:08 949661376 HODGE 0 PAGE 01 HODGE & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL & COMMUNITY PLANNING Fax Transmittal DATE: 5-N-,01 TIME SENT: .Z D m TO: 6Xedf4 FROM: Cheryle L. Hodge, Hodee & Associates TELEPHONE: Telephone # (9491661-6488 & Fax # (949) 661-3791 r THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS 2 0 01144 PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE MAILING ADDRESS: 24040 CAMINO DEL AVION, # A247 • MONARCH BEACH • CA 92629 OFFICE LOCATION: 9 FAIRE WINDS • LAGUNA NIGUEL - CALIFORNIA 92677 TELEPHONE (949) 661-6488 • FAX (049) 661-3791 E-MAID: HODGEANDASSOCQa EARTHLINKNET 05/14/2001 13:08 949GG137i, HODGE 0 PAGE 02 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH BIG CANYON IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CEQA — Response to Comments Document SCHEDULE TASK DUE DATE 1. Hodge & Associates receives April 30, 2001 authorization to proceed. 2. Hodge & Associates receives Big Cyn May 21, 2001 Cntry Club Golf Course hydrology data, Big Cyn Cntry Club By Laws, & Calif. Dept. Fish & Game correspondence. 3. Hodge & Associates (HAA) submits draft Response to Comments document May 29, 2001 (RTC) to City staff for in-house review & comment. w --w • FACSIMILE MESSAGE COVER SHEET • S LANGSTON Date May 2, 2001 _ Company City of Newport Beach Attention Mr. Javier Garcia City, State Facsimile No. From Project Name Job No. Number of Pages 949.644.3250 Verification No. 949.644.3200 Bill Langston MBCCC Pond Project Na. 2 (including cover sheet) SPECIAL NOTES TO RECEIVER: Following please find the Executed Contract Approval for big Canyon Coulwy Club Pond. A check will be forwarded to you shortly. If you have any questions, please feel free to Contact me. Thank you, 17962 Cowan Irvine, CA 92614. (949)863-9200 1949) 863-1087(FAX) N/IO 'd L80I £99 06 'ON XHd NOISON91 83aANS Nd £b,60 a3N IO-N-1,dN 0 r;NH%NLW4gING ID:949-$44-3229 APF 30,01 12129 tdn .002 P .03 April 30,2001 cay of NEWPOWf LEACii Pj.ANNING vrvAR7'MLNY 33oo Ni;wvv 'rUODUvARD N>;MPOR'r ar;ACH, CA 92658 (949) 644.3200. FAX (949) (A43250 YJA FAX A1MMA—A-l. Hodge and Associates 24040 Camino del Aviorl, Suite A-247 Monarch Beach, CA 92629 Attention: Chcryle ltodga Stilljeci: jyvlror .nentnl Study for the 111g Ca von Pond Fill. IIII vita on Sewer ItQQlaceinont Pro ee (1no 131E COBVOU Urlv4 ANC 11 ACT L4P-eS,)l VAL: Approved fly; Javier S, Garcia, A1CT' Title: Senior Planner City of Newport Beach Consultant: Hodge and Associates 24040 Camino del Avion, Suitc A-247 Monarch BCACh, CA 92629 ],reject Address: One Big Canyon Drive Dale of.Proposal: April 23, 2001, copy of proposal attacked and on illc. 4,419.12 conauitant budget amendment With the additional charges for staff review of the respunsc to comments and supplemental printing costs of ilia Reeirculatod Dommont. Project Applicant: Big Canysin Applicant Approval: Club Representative. PLANXING DEPARTMENT 13X: _ Javici Garcia .A.ICP, Senior Planner raus� �wl.Mshw attt l r Ncnn�,YHNtUNC1TIMWANVoMC'ONIRACr- upJ Ax ZO/ZO 'd L90I £99 W 'ON Xdd NOISONdI KHANS Wd W 60 QSN IO-M-AdW CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 (949) 644.3200; FAX (949) 644.3250 April 30,2001 VIA FAX AND MAIL Big Canyon Country Club 1 Big Canyon Drive Newport Beach, CA 92663 Attention: Bill Langston Subject: Environmental Study for the Big Canyon Storm Drain Project One Big Canyon Drive Dear Mr. Langston: Enclosed please find a copy of a supplemental proposal submitted by Hodge Associates Consulting regarding the preparation of a revised Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Storm Drain Project located at One Big Canyon Drive. The revision incorporates the extension of the Sanitation District trunk line affected by the proposed project. The attached proposal contains an outline of the required work, schedule of time, and estimated fee required for preparation of the task. I have also included fees for staff time to meet with the consultant and review the revised study and documents for preparation of the revised Draft Initial Study/Negative Declaration Document. The requested Consultant fees have been reviewed by the City and are considered appropriate and warranted. The fees are as follows. Consultant Fees $ 3,375.00 City Fees (Supphnt)' 500.00 Total Request: $ 3,875.00 Additional Printing Costs 543.12 (Recirculation Document) $ 4,418.12 Please submit a check in the amount of $ 4,418.12 payable to the City of Newport Beach and sign and return the enclosed authorization. Your prompt response in this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, PATRICIA L. TEMPLE, Planning Director BY Jav er S. Garcia, MCP Senior Planner ' The City Fees include an initial deposit with draws based on City Staff time at a loaded hourly rate. The applicant will be billed for additional deposits ($100.00 increments) when the City Fee's balance reaches $100.00 April 30, 2001 n LJ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 (949) 644.3200; FAX (949) 644-3250 VIA FAX AND MAIL Hodge and Associates 24040 Camino del Avion, Suite A-247 Monarch Beach, CA 92629 Attention: Cheryle Hodge Subject: Environmental Study for the Big Canyon Pond Fill and Sanitation Sewer Replacement Project/ One Big Canyon Drive CONTRACTAPPROVAL: Approved By: Javier S. Garcia, AICP Title: Senior Planner Firm: City of Newport Beach Consultant: Hodge and Associates 24040 Camino del Avion, Suite A-247 Monarch Beach, CA 92629 Project Address: One Big Canyon Drive Date of Proposal: April 23, 2001, copy of proposal attached and on file. $ 4,418.12 consultant budget amendment with the additional charges for staff review of the response to comments and supplemental printing costs of the Recirculated Document. Project Applicant: Big Canyon Country Club Applicant Approval: Signature: Bill Langston, Country Club Representative PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY: Javie • Garcia AICP, Senior Planner F:\Usem\PLN\Shamd\IPLANCOM\PENDING\BIGCANYOMCONTRACT-sup3.doc Apri130,2001 Page two attachment: Copy of Supplemental Printing Cost Invoice, dated March 26, 2001 Copy of Supplemental Consultant Proposal, dated April 23, 2001 Contract Authorization F.\Useis\PLN\Sllamd\I PLANCOM\PENDING\BIGCANYON\ConsCostSup3.doe Garcia, Jay From: Sent: To: Subject: Thayer, Christine Tuesday, April 24, 2001 10:14 AM Garcia, Jay fax # Bill Lanosdon 949-863-1087 04/23/2001 16:34 9496613791 HODGE PAGE 02 • • HODGE ANp A09001^1 April 23, 2001 Mr. Jay Garcia, Planning Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92658-8915 SUBJECT: Proposed Big Canyon Country Club Project, Newport Reach - Hodge & Associates Proposal for Response to Comments Document for the Recirculated Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Dear Mr. Garcia: Hodge and Associates is pleased to present you with this proposal for environmental consultant services. The following briefly describes the scope of services to be provided to the City ofNewport Beach. Scope of Services The following tasks are included in the scope of services included in this proposal: • Review and analysis of all public written comments submitted to the City of Newport Beach through April 4, 2001 on the Recirculated draft Initial Study/Midgated Negative Declaration prepared for the Rig Canyon Country CIub Stone Drain Improvement Project • Research and analysis (i.e. air quality, hydrology comments etc.) forpreparation of Response to Comments Document • Consultation with City staff and other public agencies (i.e. Sanitation District, Califonda Department of Fish & Game). • Preparation of draft Response to Comments Document to be submitted to City staff for review • Preparation of Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration including the Response to Comments Document Schedule Bodge & Associates is available to start work immediately upon receipt of written authorization to proceed. The first draft of the CEQA Response to Comments document would be submitted to the City within 1 week from the date of authorization to start work. The ability to meet this schedule will depend on response to requests for information and/or material from the City staff and/or applicant. 24040 CAMINO DEL AVION - SUITE A-247 - MONARCH BEACH. CA 92629 - TEL: 949/661-6488 - FAX 949/661.3791 04/23/2001 16:34 9496613791 HODGE PAGE 03 Mr. Jay Garcia, Planning Department City of Newport Beach Big Canyon Country Club Project April 23, 2001 Page Two Cost Estimate Hodge and Associates proposal is for time and materials in accordance with the attached Schedule of Fees and general conditions thereto. Reimbursable expenses such as printing, graphics, word processing, delivery are billed at cost. Our estimate for the total costs for the services presented in this proposal is $3,375.00. This amount includes up to 35 hours ofprofessional planning services at our hourly rate of $85.00 and approximately $400.00 budgeted for reimbursement expenses. This proposal shall be considered valid for an authorization date up to June 29, 2001, Thank you in advance for your consideration of our proposal. Should you have any questions, please call me at (949) 661-6488. Sincerely, C,Q"L I - V Cheryle L. Hodge HODGE AND ASSOCIATES G� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT REVIEW REQUEST Date: April 17, 2001 Staff Planner: Jay Garcia. ext. 3206 X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) X PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITIES - Attn: Mike Sinacori _ FIRE DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. X BUILDING/GRADING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES X OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Robin Clauson MARINE SAFETY _ REVENUE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (Commercial Development Only) APPLICATION OF: City of Newport Beach CONTACT: Jay Garcia 949 644-3206 FOR: REVIEW OF COMMENTS- Mitigated Negative Declaration DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon wa rye Country Club pond fill Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. The project also involves partial replacement of 1,100 feet of an Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 J` and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. LOCATION: 1 Bia Canyon Drive (Golf Course) REPORT REQUESTED BY: ASAP orb As COMMISSION REVIEW (Tentative): Review and acceptance of the environmental document will be by the Building Official (Building Director) Check all that apply: ❑ No comments on the project as presented. ❑ Recommended conditions of approval are attached, ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements or the are not expected to alter the project design. attached conditions of approval will substantially impact or alter the design of the project. ❑ I contacted the applicant on to: O schedule an appointment for Code review, O discuss the following (attach separate sheet if necessary): ADDITIONAL COMMENTS4 see attached): ..ScE 4i7— eA/en 4 i A-lzg-t , May 3, 2001 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: 1 Big Canyon Drive (Golf Course) — Mitigated Negative Declaration FINDINGS & CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONS FOR BIG CANYON SEWER/STORM DRAIN PROJECT: 1. Modify Mitigation Measure 10 to include approval by the Public Work Department. 2. The sewer line shall be relocated as early in the project as feasible. If fill over the sewer commences prior to relocation, the Country Club shall provide a back-up pump in case the fill causes failure of the existing system. 3. All work in utility easements shall require the approval of the Public Works Department prior to the start of construction. 4. All hauling operations requiring more than four trucks in any hour will require a special hauling plan which shall include routes, staging areas, traffic control and hours of operation. Hours of operation may be restricted to between 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM. COMMENTS: I was unable to determine the affect the pond fill will have on the surounding slopes as there is no exhibit showing the proximity to developed residential property, the steepness of the slopes or the percent grade and velocity of the drainage once the pond is filled in. However, the drainage report does state that the affect of the proposed construction will be to pond storm water on a fairly regular basis in an area that has never had ponded water before and to force water into a new flow path that has never seen storm flow before" The report further stated that 'Both of the above would result in the reduction of the stability of the existing slopes along the stream upstream of the proposed construction and may result in slope failure." Plancom\blg canyon pond • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT REVIEW REQUEST Date: April 17, 2001 Staff Planner: Jay Garcia, ext. 3206 X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) X PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITIES - Attn: Mike Sinacori _ FIRE DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. J� BUILDING/GRADING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES J{ OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Robin Clauson MARINE SAFETY _ REVENUE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (Commercial Development Only) APPLICATION OF: City of Newport Beach CONTACT: Jay Garcia (949) 644-3206 FOR: REVIEW OF COMMENTS- Mitigated Negative Declaration DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club pond fill Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. The project also involves partial replacement of 1,100 feet of an Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. LOCATION: 1 Big Canyon Drive (Golf Course) REPORT REQUESTED BY: ASAP or by Apri127, 2001 COMMISSION REVIEW (Tentative): Review and acceptance of the environmental document will be by the Building Official (Building Director) Check all that apply: ❑ No comments on the project as presented. ❑ Recommended conditions of approval are attached. Application of Standard Code requirements ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements or the are not expected to alter the project design. attached conditions of approval will substantially ��77yy CiA impact or alter the design of the project. I contacted t on dJ( "L, to: O schedule an appointment for Code review, 4V discuss the 1 following (attach separate sheet if ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (O see 11 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT REVIEW REQUEST Date: April 17, 2001 Staff Planner: Jay Garcia, ext. 3206 X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) X PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITIES - Attn: Mike Sinacori FIRE DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. X BUILDING/GRADING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES X OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Robin Clauson MARINE SAFETY REVENUE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (Commercial Development Only) APPLICATION OF: I City of Newport Beach CONTACT: I Jay Garcia (949) 644-3206 FOR: REVIEW OF COMMENTS- Mitigated Negative Declaration DESCRIPTION:( Request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club pond fill Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. The project also involves partial (7 �U replacement of 1,100 feet of an Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. LOCATION: 1 Big Canyon Drive (Golf Course) REPORT REQUESTED BY: ASAP or COMMISSION REVIEW (Tentative): Review and acceptance of the environmental document will be by the Building Official (Building Director) Check all that apply: ❑ No comments on the project as presented. ❑ Recommended conditions of approval are attached. ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements or the are not expected to alter the project design. attached conditions of approval will substantially impact or alter the design of the project. ❑ I contacted the applicant on to: O schedule an appointment for Code review, O discuss the following (attach separate sheet if necessary): ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (O see attached): Signature• Ext. Date: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT REVIEW REQUEST Date: A_rori117, 2001 Staff Planner: Jay Garcia, ext. 3206 X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) X PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITIES - Attn: Mike Sinacori _ FIRE DEPARTMENT PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. X BUILDING/GRADING DEPARTMENT _ COMMUNITY SERVICES X OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Robin Clauson _ MARINE SAFETY _ REVENUE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (Commercial Development Only) APPLICATION OF: I City ofNe ort Beach CONTACT: Jay Garcia (949) 644-3206 FOR: REVIEW OF COMMENTS- Mitigated Negative Declaration DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club pond fill Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. The project also involves partial replacement of 1,100 feet of an Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. LOCATION: 1 Big Canyon Drive (Golf Course) REPORT REQUESTED BY: ASAP or by April 27, 2001 COMMISSION REVIEW (Tentative): Review and acceptance of the environmental document will be by the Building Official (Building Director) Check all that apply: ❑ No comments on the project as presented. ❑ Recommended conditions of approval are attached. ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements or the are not expected to alter the project design. attached conditions of approval will substantially impact or alter the design of the project. ❑ I contacted the applicant on to: Q schedule an appointment for Code review, 0 discuss the following (attach separate sheet if necessary): ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (O see attached): Signature: Ext. Date: Garcia, Jay From: Unity Messaging System - EXCHANGE2_MIS Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 10:12 AM To: Garcia, Jay Subject: Message from Bill Langston ,I VaiceMessage • PLANNING DEPTARTMENT CITY HALL 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD P. O. BOX 1768 NEWPORT BCH, CALIFORNIA 92658.8915 Fax To: Cheryle Hodge From: Chris Thayer for Jay Garcia Fax: 949-661-3791 Pages: 8 (including cover sheet) Phone: Date: April12,2001 Re: ILefter from Governor's office CC: ❑ Urgent O For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle • Comments: Cheryle, Jay asked me to fax this to you. Call if you do not receive the pages very well. Thank you, Chris 949-644-3200 • STATE OF CALIFORNIA* o4t%`ofPu"""o Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse `CAVI Gray Davis Steve Nissen GOVERNOR DIRLCIOR April 6, 2001 Javier S. Garcia City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658 Subject: Big Canyon Country Club Project -Pond Fill, Storm Drain and Sewer Trunk Line SCH#: 2000051118 Dear Javier S. Garcia: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Negative Declaration to selected state agencies for review. On the enclosed Document Details Report please note that the Clearinghouse has listed the state agencies that reviewed your document. The review period closed on April 4, 2001, and the comments from the responding agency (ies) is (are) enclosed. If this comment package is not in order, please notify the State Clearinghouse immediately. Please refer to the project's ten -digit State Clearinghouse number in future correspondence so that we may respond promptly. Please note that Section 21104(c) of the California Public Resources Code states that: "A responsible or other public agency shall only make substantive comments regarding those activities involved in a project which are within an area of expertise of the agency or which are required to be carried out or approved by the agency. Those comments shall be supported by specific documentation." These comments are forwarded for use in preparing your final environmental document. Should you need more information or clarification of the enclosed comments, we recommend that you contact the commenting agency directly. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please contact the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the cnviroulnental review process. Sincerely, Terry R:�obcftts Senior Planner, State Clearinghouse Enclosures cc: Resources.Agency RECEIVED 13Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Am APR 10 2001 PM 71819110 111112 111213141516 1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 g16-445-o613 FAX 916-323-30I8\VWN.OPR.CA.GOVICLEARINGI-IOUSE.I3TML Ea • State Clearinghouse Data Base SCH# 2000051118 Project Tlde Big Canyon Country Club Project -Pond Fill, Storm Drain and Sewer Trunk Line Lead Agency Newport Beach, City of Type Neg Negative Declaration Description The application is a request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club to allow the placement of fill materials within an existing pond approximately 28,000 square feet in size and construction of associated improvements. Improvements include drainage pipes underground and above surface that will connect to the existing storm drains, removal and construction of golf cart paths, adjustment of manholes to grade, and relocation of an existing water line. The pond, once filled, will be landscaped and replaced with a putting green to compliment the existing golf course uses and the driving range depth will be expanded to provide additional distance. Lead Agency Contact Name Javier S. Garcia Agency City of Newport Beach Phone (949)644-3206 Fax Oman Address 3300 Newport Boulevard City Newport Beach State CA Zip -92658 Project Location County Orange City Newport Beach Region Cross Streets Big Canyon Drive & San Joaquin Hills Road Parcel No. 442-032-069 Township Range Section Base Proximity to: Highways Pacific Coast Highway Airports Railways Waterways USGS- Laguna Beach Quadrangle Schools Land Use Existing golf course with pond and golf uses/ Zoning: recreation, general plan: open space. Project issues AestheticNisual; Agricultural Land; Air Quality; Archaeologic -Historic; Drainage/Absorption; Flood Plain/Flooding; Geologic/Seismic; Noise; Public Services; Recreation/Parks; Schools/Universities; Sewer Capacity; Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading; Solid Waste; Toxic/Hazardous; Traffic/Circulation; Vegetation; Water Quality; Water Supply; Wetland/Riparian; Wildlife; Growth Inducing; Landuse; Population/Housing Balance; Minerals; Cumulative Effects Reviewing Resources Agency; California Coastal Commission; Department of Conservation; Caltrans, District 12; Agencies Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 8: Native American Heritage Commission; State Lands Commission; Department of Fish and Game, Region 5; Department of Parks and Recreation; Department of Health Services; State Water Resources Control Board, Clean Water Program Date Received 03/05/2001 Start of Review 03/06/2001 . End of Review 04/04/2001 Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 12 3347 Michelson Drive Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92612-0661 MAR 2 7 2001 March 16, 2001 Javier S. Garcia, Senior Planner City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Subject: Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain Project Dear Mr. Garcia, File: IGR/CEQA SCHM 20000511\$ Log #: 740 A Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Revised Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration dated March 2,2001 on the Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain Project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing artificial pond and construction of associated improvements. The project site is located on 1 Big Canyon Drive within the Country Club golf course in the City of Newport Beach. Caltrans District 12 status is a reviewing agency on this project and has no comments at this time. However, in the event of any activity in Caltrans right way an encroachment permit is required. Applicants are required to plan for sufficient permit processing time, which may include engineering studies and environmental documentation. Please continue to keep us informed of this project and other future developments, which could potentially impact our Transportation facilities. If you have any questions or need to contact us please do not hesitate to call Maryam Molavi at (949) 724-2267. Sincerely, Robert F. Jos p Chief Advanced Planning Branch cc: Terry Roberts, CPR Ron Helgeson, HDQRTRS Planning STATE OF CAUFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGE • _ GRAY DAVIS, Govemoi DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME South Coast Region 4949 Viewridge Avenue San Diego, California 92123 (858) 467-4201 FAX (858) 467-4235 mCEIVED 8Y Apri14, 2001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Oi-y OF hIFWP(1RT PEACH APR 10 2001 PM Javier S. Garcia City of Newport Beach Planning Department '718 )9110 )11)1? )112)Si4 )616 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658 Comments -on the Big -Canyon Country Club Project — Pond Fill, Storm Drain & Sewer Trunk Line Revised Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, City of Newport Beach (SCH#2000051118) Dear Mr. Garcia: The Department ,of Fish -and -Game (Department) has reviewed the -above -referenced Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration-(MND) that was received,on December 19, 2000. The Department is identified as a Trustee Agency pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15386 and is responsible for the conservation; protection and management of the state's biological resources. The application is a request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. Improvements include drainage pipes underground and above surface that will connect to the existing storm drains, removal and construction of golf cart paths, adjustment of manholes to grade, and relocation of an existing water line. The pond, once filled, will be landscaped and replaced with a putting green to compliment the existing golf course uses and the driving range depth expanded to provide additional distance. The project is located at 1 Big Canyon Drive within the Big Canyon Country Club Golf Course in Newport Beach. The site contains an existing pond, approximately 0:64 acres in size. Surrounding and nearby properties include the golf course and single-family residential to the north of the pond. Currently, the pond flows into an existing storm drain system that carries the water to the bay. With the proposed filling of the pond, the existing storm drain system will remain. However, instead of the water flowing through the pond, it will flow through pipes to be placed in the area of the pond,that will connect to the existing storm drain system. The project also involves partial replacement• of, an Orange County Sanitation OCSD. (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line.. The .existing 15-inch.sewer line is:part of the Big Canyon, Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. The sewer Javier S. Garcia April 4, 2001 Page 2 line begins east of MacArthur Boulevard and extends through Big Canyon Golf Course to just west of Jamboree Road. The existing sewer line is comprised of 15-inch and 12-inch VCP (vitrified clay pipe). A portion (from manhole 19 to manhole 14) of the existing sewer line will be replaced with approximately 1,100 feet of new 12-inch VCP. The new sewer will integrate into the existing system. The sewer line improvement will require the rehabilitation and replacement of at least 6 manholes. The sewer line improvement would be constructed in conjunction with the Big Canyon Country Club pond filling and storm drain improvements. The site supports the yellow warbler (Dendroica petechia brewstert), a California Species of Special Concern and provides roosts and potential nesting habitat for black -crowned night heron (Nycticorax nycticorax) and other migratory birds. The pond supports native emergent wetland vegetation, including bulrush (Scirpus sp.) The Department offers the following comments and recommendations: Stream, Wetland,.and Riparian Resources The jurisdictional delineation prepared for the project dated April 13, 2000 (Appendix C) identifies a total of 0.64 acre of CDFG jurisdiction associated with the pond only. An additional 0.27 acre of drainage flowing into the pond is identified as "Waters of the United States" subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The additional 0.27 acre of stream flowing into the pond is also subject to the Department's jurisdiction, and impacts within the stream require mitigation. Please note that in stream systems, the limits of the Department's jurisdiction may exceed the area subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Department considers the loss of wetland habitat as a significant impact. Wetlands provide essential habitat for wide variety of important resident and migratory wildlife species. Mitigation Measure Number 3 discusses the project's need for required permits/agreements, but does not adequately describe a proposal to mitigate for the loss of all of the jurisdictional resources, including the on -site stream. If specific mitigationplans are not described in the final MND, the mitigation may require separate CEQA documentation. The Department recommends that the final MND discusses a conceptual mitigation plan including a proposed location. The project will require a Streambed Alteration Agreement, pursuant to Section 1600 et seq. of the Fish and Game Code, with the applicant prior to the applicant's commencement of any activity that will substantially divert or obstruct the natural flow or substantially change the bed, channel, or bank (which may include associated riparian resources) of a river, stream or lake, or use material from a streambed. The Department's issuance of a Streambed Alteration Agreement for a project that is subject to CEQA will require CEQA compliance actions by the Department as a responsible agency. The Department as a responsible agency under CEQA, may consider the Javier S. Garcia April4, 2001 Page 3 local jurisdiction's (lead agency) Negative Declaration or EIR for the project. To minimize additional requirements by the Department pursuant to Section 1600 et seq. and/or under CEQA, the document should fully identify the potential impacts to the lake, stream or riparian resources and provide adequate avoidance, mitigation, monitoring and reporting commitments for issuance of the agreement. A Streambed Alteration Agreement form may be obtained by writing to The Department of Fish and Game, 4949 Viewridge Avenue, San Diego, CA 92123, or by calling (858) 636-3160, or by accessing the Departments web site at www.dfg.ca.gov/1600. The MND fails to provide the level of detail necessary for the Department to consider issuing a Streambed Alteration Agreement without additional CEQA documentation. Impacts to Nesting Birds In order to avoid impacts to nesting migratory birds, the Department recommends that grading and construction take place outside of the peak breeding season for migratory birds (March 1- July 31). If grading and construction take place during the peak breeding season, the Department recommends that construction, grading, or clearing activities within 300 feet of any active nests of raptors and 100 feet of other migratory birds should be avoided. The Department appreciates the opportunity to comment on your project. If you have any questions or comments pertaining to this letter, please contact Brad Henderson at (310) 214- 9950. Sincerer, r� William E. Tippets Environmental Program Manager cc: Department of Fish and Game File U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board State Clearinghouse 134/03/2001 16:38 9496613791 • HODGE PAGE 02 April 3, 2001 HODGE AND A93490CIATES Mr. Jay Garcia, Planning Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92658-8915 SUBJECT: Proposed Big Canyon Country Club Pond Fill, Storm Drain, & Sewer Trunk Improvement Project, Newport Beach - Hodge & Associates Professional Environmental & Planning Services. Dear Mr. Garcia: Per our recent telephone conversation regarding the above pending project, I am provid ng you with this follow-up letter regarding environmental consultant services that may be anticipated for completion of the CEQA process. The following briefly describes the tasks to be completed following the conclusion of the public review period on April 4, 2001 of the draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. These tasks include: • Review and analysis of all public written comments submitted to the City of Newport Beach on the draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Big Canyon Country Club project. This task includes research and analysis (if needed) of comments. • Consultation with City staff • Preparation of draft Response to Comments Document to be submitted to City staff for review • Preparation of Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration including the Response to Comments Document (if written responses are prepared). CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines do not require a formal written response to public comments (i.e. Response to Comments document) when the project does not involve the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Since a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the subject project, it's the discretion of the Lead Agency (City ofNewport Beach) whether or not formal written responses will be prepared and/or distributed to commenting agencies, organizations, and/or interested persons prior to City action on a project. Regardless of whether written responses are prepared, all of the project information, including public comments are considered in the decision making process. 24040 CAMINO OEL AVION • SUITE A•247 • MONAACH 6EACH. CA 92629 • TEL: 949/661.6488 • FAX: 942/661.3791 04/03/2001 16:38 9496613791 HODGE PAGE 03 Mr, Jay Garcia, Planning Department City of Newport Beach Big Canyon Country Club Project April 3,2001 Page Two As you may know, our contract for environmental services covered tasks through distribution of the draftIS/MND for public review in March 2001. Hodge &Associates can provide assistance with the above tasks subject to consideration of a budget amendment. It is anticipated that reimbursable expenses such as printing would be similar to that of publishing the draft CEQA document, however, the printing costs would be increased with the addition of the public comments recently submitted to the City. Hodge and Associates is available to provide environmental services in accordance with our Schedule of Fees and general conditions on file with the City. Reimbursable expenses such as printing and postage are billed at cost. Professional planning services are billed at our hourly rate of $85.00 Thank you in advance for your consideration of this letter. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please call me at (949) 661-6489. Sincerely, %k/ K3,lp Cheryle L. Hodge HODGE AND ASSOCIATES March 30, 2001 City of Newport Beach Planning Department Attention: Javier S. Garcia, Senior Planner 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 RECEIVED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY nF NPA/onRT REAChI AM Hrn 0 � 2001 PM 718, 911011.1112111213141u 16 V RE: CANYON HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION — BIG CANYON COUNTRY CLUB PROJECT Dear Mr. Garcia: The Association is in receipt of a copy of the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the subject project. Since home sites within our Association are adjacent to the project, we have concerns for the adequacy of the design for the proposed drainage facilities modification. Dr. & Mrs. Klieman at 21 Lochmoor Lane have provided us with a hydrology and drainage report prepared by Hunsaker & Associates, undated but appears to be September 9, 2000. That report indicates that Hunsaker, at that time at least, had not been able after several visits to the Public Works Department to view either a hydraulic drainage study or a proposed design for the drainage facilities modification.. Dr. & Mrs. Klieman have sought to have this Association join in objection to the removal of the small lake at the rear of their lot. We feel that it is incumbent upon the Association to be assured that the Public Works Department has thoroughly studied and evaluated the drainage facilities design to confirm that there would be no detrimental effects upon any of the lots within this Association. Obviously, as lay person, directors of this association are not technically qualified to evaluate the proposed drainage facilities. We depend upon the expertise of the engineers employed by the City. Therefore, it would seem appropriate that there be a written report issued by the Public Works Department certifying that the design does meet in all respects the criteria of the City of Newport Beach for frequency of storm design and the ability of the design to carry the indicated storm flows and not represent an endangerment to the slopes supporting the adjacent home sites. A statement to that effect should be contained in the official findings of the City in this matter. Sincerely, CANYON HILLS BOARD OF DIRECTORS cc: Dr. & Mrs. Klieman David Voorhees, Big Canyon Country Club Steve Bromberg, City of Newport Beach Councihnember \\villagemyMprojeclACanyon Hills 00g\Facilities\Facilities Con•esp\CITY OF NB-21 LOCHMOOR-KLIEMAN 033001.DOC • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH •P.O, BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 9265&8915 FAX COVER SHEET NO. OF PAGES: Z (including cover sheet) DATE: 3 — TO: PHONE NO. FAX NO, C3to� �i1q— 85V RE: 05! oC AAPD FROM: Gay-L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 PHONE NO.: (949) 644- 5u�Co FAX NO.: (949) 644. 3250 SPECIAL r `• INSTRUCTIONS: kr h w,„I n o C-O e y r5l. -{ , Am -hi-- ek1" IV144. n'I.C4(uf ✓G JCIA .�Jl S ,1 0. f40I��GFvl4h_of CO�J� Q y � r� -s.6 h� TO c am .ks �J1 �w n� H^ate a" s Nov, 6% 1�12rc lYc ul crl<4 �/Va��/%{ ale• �twtwi k j �h �{l+ A; KlientiuM # lh1 S Ylb- iL- 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach a C� March 26, 2001 Mr. Jay Garcia, Planning Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92658-8915 HODGE AND ASSOCIATES • RECEIVED $y PLANNING. DEPARTMENT CITY OF NE\WPnPT PEACH AM MAR 2 8 2001 PM 71819110111 i 1� Il 1213141616 SUBJECT: Proposed Big Canyon Country Club —Pond Fill, Storm Drain & Sewer Improvement Project, Newport Beach - Hodge & Associates Request for Budget Amendment for Preparation of Revised Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Dear Mr. Garcia: The purpose of this letter is to request your approval of a contract allocation for the above referenced project. This request is necessitated to accommodate reimbursement expenditures (e.g. printing, postage etc.) that exceeded the budget. Attached for your reference is a contract summary chart that depicts the costs to the project through Invoice #2001-11 dated March 9, 2001. As can be seen on the attached chart, $184.73 of the reimbursement budget of $200 has been used with a remaining amount of $15.27. With the completion of the Draft IS/MND for public review, an additional $559.14 of expenses have been incurred for printing and postage as shown on the attached invoice dated March 26, 2001. Therefore, an additional $543.87 is needed to cover costs that have exceeded the contract. Reimbursable expenses such as printing, postage, etc. are billed at cost with no additional charge by Hodge & Associates. Additionally, we also anticipate that to complete the processing of the CEQA compliance, coordination with your office, including preparation and filing/posting of the Notice of Determination (NOD) will be needed. Therefore, we respectfully request a total budget amendment of $650.00. The total contract amount of $9,320.00 (includes original contract, l5` amendment for response to comments, 2"d amendment for revised CEQA doc) and with this requested increase would be amended to $9,970.00. In addition to the contract summary chart, I've enclosed an invoice dated March 26, 2001 for expenses billed at cost that were incurred for publication of the draft CEQA document. Your consideration of this request is appreciated. If you have any questions, please call me at (949) 661-6488. Sincerely Cheryle L. Hodge HODGE & ASSOCIATES Attachment: Contract Summary Chart Invoice dated 3/26/01 24040 CAMINO DEL AVION • SUITE A-247 • MONARCH BEACH, CA 92629 • TEL: 949/661-6488 • FAX: 949/661-3791 DESCRIPTION CONTRACT CONTRACT TOTAL AMOUNT AMOUNT USED TO DATE AMOUNT REMAINING Prep of Draft Initial Study & Mitigated (Original Contract) $4,840.00 -0- (Completed) Negative Declaration (IS/MND) (Proposal $4,840.00 dated 3/21/00) Prep of Response to Comments Document (Budget Amendment) $1,560.00 -0- (Completed) (Proposal dated 7/13/00) $1,560.00 Prep of Revised IS/MND (CEQA doc) — (Budget Amendment) $2,877.20 $42.80 (Proposal dated 11/10/00) $2,920.00 Total Reimbursement Expense Budgeted ($200) $184.73 $15.27 Per 11/10/00 Proposal Description Total $9,320.00 $9,277.20 $42.80 0 Hodge & Associates 24040 Camino Del Avion PMB#A247 Monarch Beach, CA 92629 D City of Newport Beach, Planning Dept. Patricia Temple, Planning Director P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Invoice Date Invoice # 3/26/2001 2001-15 Contract #/or PO # Terms Project Big Cyn Pond Net 30 Big Cyn Cntry Club ... Service Date Description Qty/Hrs Hourly Rate Amount Reimbursements: Printing Reimbursement (draft CEQA doe - publication) Printing Reimbursement (draft CEQA doe - publication) Postage - FedEx fee for mailing CEQA does to State of 134.56 347.62 76.96 134.56 347.62 76.96 California OPR (Sacramento). Tax ID #555259493 Total $559.14 Balance Due $559.14 CONSOLIDATED A M 1 KRAEMERPL CORPORATE OFFICES /N EMPIRE 31 MUSICK AVENUE 25 AROLINE ST., STE. C LAGUNA HILLS 23271 VERDUGO OR. REPROGRAPHICS A EIM, CA 92806 (714) 630.1663 IRVINE, CA 92618 (9491 588-3839 SA RNAOINO, CA 92408 1909) 370-CRCR 12727) LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653 1949) 581-2563 DIVISIO/VOFLASON LASVEGAS OCAIRPORT TUSTIN SUPPL Y ORDER DESK 505E CAPOVILLA K 101 3182 PULLMAN ST. 560 W. FIRST ST. (714) 665.2040 DEL/VERY INVOICE (7 2/ 361-0666 89119 17114) 751.2680 92626 (774) 838 2858 81 (7114) 665-2037 Fax Your image. Our rep5(949) N0. 0317 SOLD TO: 5285 SH5285 HODGE AND ASSOCIATES DGE AND ASSOCIATES 24040 CAMINO DEL AVION AIRE WINDS SUITE A247 MONARCH BEACH CA 92629 UNA NIG A '92677 661-3791 TIME WANTED A W 0 N CHERYL HODGE BIG CNYN•NB 0900 14 3i i01 31037 WIC SHIPTYPE CARRIER CLERK ITIMV SLSP TAX S 0 PICKUP & DELIVERY -HEDRICK, DERCK Iikj 8:17:00 D .•. 230050 XEROX 11 X1 7 IMAGE COST 48 14 48 0 EA 19.85 230310 XEROX 11X17 WHITE 20 SHEET 48 14 48 0 EA 0100 230010 XEROX LETTER IMAGE COST 2416 14 2416 0 EA 169.12 230110 XEROX 8.5X11 WHITE 20 1208 14 1208 0 EA 0.00 232020 BINDERY - GBC PUNCH 2 14 2 0 M 11.20 230160-15 XEROX 8.5X11 BLUE 11OLB 32 14 32 0 EA 7.36 235010-100 BINDERY - GBC COMB TO 1 INCH 15 14 15 0 EQ 15.00 220010-11 CLC COLOR IMAGE ON 8.5X11 96 14 96 0 EA 95.04 Number of originals: 6 Number of copies: 16Size: OXO ( pplie to above i am) 221010-11 LASER COPY PAPER 24 8.5X11 96 14 96 0 EA 4.80 150000 TEMPORARY GAS SURCHARGE 1 14 1 0 1 1 1.00 RETURN ALL TO:SHIP TO ADDRESS TERMS: PLEASE REMIT TO: P.O. BOX 513865, LOS ANGELES CA. 90051-3865 PAGE 1 CUSTOMER COPY 0 is SALE -31" nbeatable Every Day 33959 Doheny Park Road San Juan (7apistrano,CA 92675 547921 4 005 37362 0385 03 O1/O1 03:32 CtQA ACC OUR PRICE 1 B&W COLLATED COPYI 984253 1 B&W COLLATED COPYI 384253 1 B&W UNCOLLATED 1-9 384265 1 B&W UNCOLLATED 1-9 384265 1 B&W UNCOLLATED 1-9 384265 1 COLOR 1-49 384242 1 COLOR 50-99 384244 1 CARD BLUE LTR 250 010199066358 SUBTOTAL 7.5000% Standard Tax TOTAL American Express Card No.: XXXXXXXXXXX3007 <S> Expiration Date; 05/02 Auth No.: 554723 STAPLES WILL * NOT BE UNDERSOLD! THANK YOU FOR SHOPPING AT STAPLES !! .: "t' xx".tKP�N.r1W w. x'�Y•. b`hyle,��•liaY S" yy;;AC'":S'n t � T{ v�N r` 5 ,{� aT•�h�.Y*S,i.;Y.-%r .:'.ai KEX- USAA•brbill H3 826017475198 Express x Y aY. M}n'PYMK 4a Expreu Package Snvice Packmgs o so IST/& / Sender's FsdEt d[MrcwmWmaGYwnYw Yvi 7 / Account Number XxF,eo�Po Ovemipht ❑ Rd�tt nddard OvemiAht ❑ FedE<�Y[Overnight u t Q O.H[rymuYnb[[bYu is 1 \C Phono �/p�` l� 1 ��C-..,C`_`_-`�"Me ��q)Agj^fn7QU ❑FedEr20ey` ❑FedI EvproasSaver' �—a—r s.wmwWu[ar nutlo-mwar •H¢[imMaowm�wummYtY MY 114094 f / // LV� � S 4b Exprsu FTei6MSetvice o*„r M ,t�e[exdrwt� t 1 r ❑ FedFxiDayFreipht• ❑ PooFx2OeyFreiAht ❑ FedEx30e�FreiAht •arwcerwm[w vwemr..[Yr mwawe.0 w opwamrsw.r / /�,� 5 Packaging •o[[wtl.[Y[Yuam LC7l �V8l smte C LP 9�7 ❑ FedEaEnvelope/ ❑FedFxPak• ONerPk9 is ll'' _ Letter' �iM)+BawHEHrua z a Z Questions? Vick our Web site at www.fedox.com or call 1•e00•Go•FedW(eODj463-3339. BYu"di,,A] n SorW WGPctcvdU smtNb ckvf ly.,;a YMinaur Pp y 6 Special Handling 1—lwlwiew.da.elYs.mbxa •--� SATIeoAYDsFaY $UNOAYDeVYery Weekdey ri''-''T�NOw SeaWey HOLD ❑BEST M,'w'Na ❑aea yPoNS ❑et Faffnn aeol l : at US LUeaeen 1a AnYd[vybifHnMwAr 4r[YENeN/IvexaPwhr RRMtcIn0NS RmsIrn:InmS MmVa't[ntlHEHIDW P'PMe.b[WttSP[w[[ M..Uu." MU[EYpV/NHehrmW 9 mM[mthis' HeHrwownW omsYwHx.my oonAYaN�e[uesFdsNwwoppedsT mrYMb[pwn [ - — pwdePPu(M[M[aN ---I �C JR;No Yes Yes ❑ O Ica ❑am.,w ❑ A ya enrorm[[Ywan arcri[Ica as—.—.—q axpw,o.kndm ."kw ❑' z Oegxauawtl[[[mxbWpptlniNhp[YPq Car9oAncratrOnhy 7 Payment Prd No ---t Br a '�N —6[W FM4MnNp woW MNw. ❑ kenftpsa ❑Hecipierd ❑Third Petry �CrsddCerd ❑CesIvrCheck = twl oP�`e[unw JMom TaelPAr Total Might ToWDeclredIVhet a .DA iW4M1kTYYNndtaat0l WPupudrxwehgdxrplxapaP<I/prdMY, fPRxlh oe/ � 6 paNaaa $ignawro Jq�bpwwnaw.WYYrwe.tY.,uPpw• ntl W�rrm �xGMkwM1�m�iwImniM SW[n��emY PnpnPM.r[nuwis.oie�-mmr[a..PNr,mxusa acre itm naiarerce, tl Yn ioswlojuowpelOA000jus 9uolndllg,swlNO9Io4odo)de4y J0iiuewem ('mLiOindioumoopoiunowe m NurvxrcGASMt6c .P W904lr4Apsl!uwemjlio iue4Oiewg4i March 3. 2001 e DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 12 3347 Michelson Drive Suite 100 Irvine, CA. 92612.0661 March 16, 2001 Javier S. Garcia, Senior Planner City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 0 GRAY DAVI RECEIVED BY PLANNING EWPO DEPARTMENT p ' CITy Tv o ►BAR 2 7 2001 PM AM 101112123466 �,a,ial I I I I I I I I Subject: Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain Project Dear Mr. Garcia, File: IGR/CEQA SCH#: 2000051080 Log #: 740 A Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Revised Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration dated March 2,2001 on the Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain Project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing artificial pond and construction of associated improvements. The project site is located on 1 Big Canyon Drive within the Country Club golf course in the City of Newport Beach. Caltrans District 12 status is a reviewing agency on this project and has no comments at this time. However, in,theevent of any activity in Caltrans right way an encroachment permit is required. Applicants are required to plan for sufficient permit processing time, which may include engineering studies and environmental documentation. Please continue to keep us informed of this project and other future developments, which could potentially impact our Transportation facilities. If you have any questions or need to contact us please do not hesitate to call Maryam Molavi at (949) 724-2267. Sincerely, Robert F. Jos p Chief Advanced Planning Branch cc: TerryRoberts, 'OPR Ron Helgeson, HDQRTRS Planning Gray Davis GOVERNOR DATE: • STATE OF CALIFORNIA 0 Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT March 13, 2001 TO: Javier S. Garcia City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 p4t`'fOF 4�N9 �a OF C60F�P�\' Steve Nissen DIRCCLOR RECEIVED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF NE�'`1pORT F�EACH hiAl 1 6 250, PM AM 3456 71B1911011111211121 I I I RE: Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain Project -Pond Fill, Storm Drain and Sewer Trunk Linet SCH#: 2000051118 This is to acknowledge that the State Clearinghouse has received your environmental document for state review. The review period assigned by the State Clearinghouse is: Review Start Date: March 6, 2001 Review End Date: April 4, 2001 We have distributed your document to the following agencies and departments: Caltrans, District 3 Department of Fish and Game, Region 2 Department of Health Services Department of Parks and Recreation Department of Toxic Substances Control Native American Heritage Commission Office of Historic Preservation Public Utilities Commission Reclamation Board Regional Water Quality Control Bd., Region 5 (Sacramento) Resources Agency State Lands Commission State Water Resources Control Board, Clean Water Program The State Clearinghouse will provide a closing letter with any state agency comments to your attention on the date following the close of the review period. Thank you for your participation in the State Clearinghouse review process. I400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 9I6-445-0613 FAX 916-323-3018\VWN.OPR.CA.GOVICLEARINGHOUSE.HTML WE Garcia, Jay From: Thayer, Christine Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 11:34 AM To: Garcia, Jay Subject: negative declaration info for Candy Klieman Jnv fir "Neuative Declaration" for Her lawyers address: Buchalter, Nemer, Fields & Younger Attn: Alan Kessel 895 Dove Street, Suite 400 Newport Beach CA 92660 Phone # 949-760-1121 Candy Klieman 21 Loclunoor Lane Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone # - 949-644-9546 03/12/2001 11:16 9496613791� HODGE PAGE 01 HODGE & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL & COMMUNITY PLANNING Fax Transmittal DATE: 3 I2 - G/ TIME SENT: &-:6 a.14 - FROM: Chervle L. Hodge, Home & Associates TELEPHONE: Telephone # (949) 661-6488 & Fax # (949) 661-3791 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS Z PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE MAILING ADDRESS: 24040 CAMINO DEL AVION, # A247 • MONARCH BEACH • CA 92629 OFFICE LOCATION: 9 FAIRE WINDS • LAGUNA NIGUEL • CALIFORNIA 92677 TELEPHONE (949) 661-6488 • FAX (949) 661-3791 E-MAIL: HODGEANDASSOCQEARTHLINV NET 03/12/2001 11:16 949661379 HODGE PAGE 02 �►on &Vf)l cty 011L) b 0 ti2t$cnton C�tsr /r+N7e/906LIe PORC6 Jae Chung, L•-nv. Regulatory Branch Judi Tamasi William E. Tippets, Habitat Consotvadan supv. US Army Corps of Engineers US Fish & Wildlife Service California Dept. Fish & Game 911 Wilshire Blvd 2730 Loker Ave West 4949 Viewridge Ave Los Angeles, CA 90017 Carlsbad, CA 92008 San Diego, CA 92123 Ms, Wanda Smith, Planning Section Calif, Regional Water Quality Cntrl Brd 3737 Main Sr, Suite 500 Riverside, CA 92501-3348 6"Qed rdmtt Robert F. Joseph, Chief, Adv. Plug Bmch Dept. of Transportation, Dist. 12 3347 Michelson Dr., Suue lo0 Irvine, CA 92612-0661 Mark Tomoko, Engmeering Orange County Sanitation Disuicr P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 cr p y oE' CAA 4A4cur+ &4 4' Notme eC -0) 4&)4- 4 -Me �.t\o..a %:A5 warC- Big Canyon Community Assoc P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92646 Felsott, Lee & Fenberg Attn: Stanley Feldsott 4 Civic Center Plaza, Ste 300 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dr. and Mrs. Charles Klieman 21 Lochmoor bane Newport Beach, California 92660 e or Ople C1!5 �oprrs ZzTec1 a caP7 of Nci,ce of sn�ei Pacon Callahan McHolmi & Winto Canyon Hills Community Assoc Attn: Kathleen Carothers Plaone P.O. Box 4708 P.O. Box 19613 Irvine, CA 92623-9613 EIS Attn: Peter Lewandowski 26051 Via Concha Mission Viejo, CA 92691-5614 Irvine, CA 92646 Brett Williamson O'Melveuy & Meyers, LLP 620 Newport Center Dr., 17`6 Floor Newport Beach, CA 92660 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT REVIEW REQUEST Date: March 8, 2001 Staff Planner: Jay Garcia, ext. 3206 _ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) X PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITIES - Attn: Mike Sinacori _ FIRE DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. X BUILDING/GRADING DEPARTMENT _ COMMUNITY SERVICES X OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Robin Clauson _ MARINE SAFETY _ REVENUE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (Commercial Development Only) APPLICATION OF: I City ofNewport Beach= CONTACT: Jay Garcia 949 644-3206 FOR: Mitigated Negative Declaration DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club pond fill Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. The project also involves partial replacement of 1,100 feet of an Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. LOCATION: 1 Big Canyon Drive (Golf Course) REPORT REQUESTED BY: March 26, 2001 COMMISSION REVIEW (Tentative): Review and acceptance of the environmental document will be by the Building Official (Building Director) Check all that apply: ❑ No comments on the project as presented. ❑ Recommended conditions of approval are attached. ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements or the are not expected to alter the project design. attached conditions of approval will substantially impact or alter the design of the project. ❑ I contacted the applicant on to: 0 schedule an appointment for Code review, O discuss the following (attach separate sheet if necessary): ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (0 see attached): Signature: Ext. Date: 01 • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT REVIEW REQUEST Date: March 7, 2001 Staff Planner: Jay Garcia, ext. 3206 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) X. PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITIES - Attn: Mike Sinacori _ FIRE DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. X. BUILDING/GRADING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES X OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Robin Clauson MARINE SAFETY REVENUE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (Commercial Development Only) APPLICATION OF: Cityof Newport Beach CONTACT: Jay Garcia (949) 644-3206 FOR: Mitigated Negative Declaration DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club pnd fill,Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an, existing pond and construction of associated improvements. The project also involves partial replacement of 1,100 feet of an Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. LOCATION: I Big Canyon Drive (Golf Course) REPORT REQUESTED BY: March 26, 2001 COMMISSION REVIEW (Tentative): Review and acceptance of the environmental document will be by the Building Official (Building Director) Check all that apply: ❑ No cot r� on the project as presented. ❑ Recommended conditions of approval are attached. ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements or the are not expected to alter the project design. attached conditions of approval will substantially impact or alter the design of the project. ❑ I contacted the applicant on to: O schedule an appointment for Code review, O discuss the following (attach separate sheet if necessary): ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (O see eepJes S&%n - 5171ot r CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT REVIEW REQUEST l Date: March 7, 2001 Staff Planner: Jay Garcia, ext. 3206 _ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) X PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITIES - Attn: Mike Sinacori _ FIRE DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. X. BUILDING/GRADING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES X. OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Robin Clauson MARINE SAFETY _ REVENUE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (Commercial Development Only) APPLICATION OF: I City of Ne ort Beach CONTACT: Jay Garcia (949) 644-3206 FOR: Mitigated Negative Declaration DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club pnd fill,Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. The project also involves partial replacement of 1,100 feet of an Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. LOCATION: 1 Big Canyon Drive (Golf Course) I REPORT REQUESTED BY: March 26, 2001 1 COMMISSION REVIEW (Tentative): Review and acceptance of the environmental document will be by the Building Official (Building Director) Check all that aonly: ❑ No comments on the project as presented. ❑ Recommended conditions of approval are attached. ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements or the are not expected to alter the project design. attached conditions of approval will substantially impact or alter the design of the project. ❑ I contacted the applicant on to: 0 schedule an appointment for Code review, 0 discuss the following (attach separate sheet if ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (0 see attached): Signature: Ext. Date: 4-11' SCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Newport Beach, has prepared a Revised Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed project described below. The Draft Initial Study has determined that if the proposed conditions and mitigation measures are applied to the project there will not be a significant effect on the environment. The City therefore intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Revised Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been recirculated for a 30-day public review period in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Project Name: Big Canyon Country Club Project — Pond Fill, Storm Drain & Sewer Trunk Line Project Location: The site is located at 1 Big Canyon Drive within the Big Canyon Country Club golf course in the City of Newport Beach. Proiect Proponent Big Canyon Country Club, 1 Big Canyon Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92663 Responsible Asency: Orange County Sanitation District, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Public Review Period: March 5, 2001 to April 3, 2001 Project Description: The application is a request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. Improvements include drainage pipes underground and above surface that will connect to the existing storm drains, removal and construction of golf cart paths, adjustment of manholes to grade, and relocation of an existing water line. The pond, once filled, will be landscaped and replaced with a putting green to compliment the existing golf course uses and the driving range depth expanded to provide additional distance. The project is located at I Big Canyon Drive within the Big Canyon Country Club Golf Course in Newport Beach. The site contains an existing pond approximately 0.64 acres in size. Surrounding and nearby properties include the golf course and single-family residential to the north of the pond. Currently, the pond flows into an existing storm drain system that carves the water to the bay. With the proposed filling of the pond, the existing storm drain system will remain. However, instead of the water flowing through the pond, it will flow through pipes to be placed in the area of the pond that will connect to the existing storm drain system. The project also involves partial replacement of an Orange County Sanitation OCSD (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. The sewer line begins east of MacArthur Boulevard and extends through Big Canyon Golf Course to just west of Jamboree Road. The existing sewer line is comprised of 15-inch and 12-inch VCP (vitrified clay pipe). A portion (from manhole 19 to manhole 14) of the existing sewer line will be replaced with approximately 1,100 feet of new 12-inch VCP. The new sewer will integrate into the existing system The sewer line improvement will require the rehabilitation and replacement of at least 6 manholes. The sewer line improvement would be constructed in conjunction with the Big Canyon Country Club pond filling and storm drain improvements. Opportunities for Public Review: Interested persons are invited to review the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, including studies and/or exhibits relating to the proposed project, and submit comments. The City of Newport Beach prior to final action on the proposed project will consider these documents and all comments received. A copy of the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and related documents are available for review at the following location: Newport Beach City Hall Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 If you wish to appeal the appropriateness or the adequacy of the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, your comments should be submitted in writing prior to the close of the public review period stated above. Your comments should specifically identify what environmental impacts you believe would result from the project, why they are significant, and what changes or mitigation measures you believe should be adopted to eliminate or reduce these impacts. If you have any questions or would like further information, please contact Javier S. Garcia, Senior Planner at (949) 644-3206. Date of Publication: March 5, 2001 ,, 1 Gary L. Granville Orange County Clerk -Recorder P. O. Box 238 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Office of the Orange County Clerk -Recorder Memorandum SUBJECT: Environmental Impact Reports Amendment of "Public Resources Code, Section 21092.3" — The attached notice was received, filed and a copy was posted on / It remained posted for 20 (twenty) days. Gary L. Granville County Clerk -Recorder of the State of California in and for the County of Orange By: ROSAM CALU,n _Deputy Public Resource Code 21092.3 The notices regpuired pursuant to Sections 21080.4 and 21092 for an environmental im act r o shall be osted in the office of the County Clerk of each county m which the project will be located and shall remain posted for a period of 30 days` The notice Leanjrgdp for a oerod of 20 days. within 24 hours of receipt. Public Resources Code 21152 All notices filed pursuant to this section shall be available for public inspection, and shall be posted ***within 24 hours of receipt in the office of the County Clerk. Each notice shall remain posted for a period of 30 days. ***Thereafter, the clerk shall return the notice to the local lead agency ***within a notation of the period it was posted. The local lead agency shall retain the notice for not less than nine months. Additions or changes by underline; deletions by *** WTY OF NEWPORT BEACH 19 NOTICE OF INTENT It TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Newport Beach, has prepared a Revised Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed project described below. The Draft Initial Study has determined that if the proposed conditions and mitigation measures are applied to the project there will not be a significant effect on the environment. The City therefore intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Revised Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been recirculated for a 30-day public review period in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Project Name: Big Canyon Country Club Project —Pond Fill, Storm Drain & Sewer Trunk Line Project Location: The site is located at 1 Big Canyon Drive within the Big Canyon Country Club golf course in the City of Newport Beach. Project Proponent: Big Canyon Country Club, 1 Big Canyon Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92663 Responsible Agenev: Orange County Sanitation District, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Public Review Period: March 5, 2001 to April 3, 2001 Proiect Description: The application is a request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. hmprovements include drainage pipes underground and above surface that will connect to the existing storm drains, removal and construction of golf cart paths, adjustment of manholes to grade, and relocation of an existing water line. The pond, once filled, will be landscaped and replaced with a putting green to compliment the existing golf course uses and the driving range depth expanded to provide additional distance, The project is located at 1 Big Canyon Drive within the Big Canyon Country Club Golf Course in Newport Beach. The site contains an existing pond approximately 0.64 acres in size. Surrounding and nearby properties include the golf course and single-family residential to the north of the pond. Currently, the pond flows into an existing storm drain system that carries the water to the bay. With the proposed filling of the pond, the existing storm drain system will remain. However, instead of the water flowing through the pond, it will flow through pipes to be placed in the area of the pond that will connect to the existing storm drain system. The project also involves partial replacement of an Orange County Sanitation OCSD (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. The sewer line begins east of MacArthur Boulevard and extends through Big Canyon Golf Course to just west of Jamboree Road. The existing sewer line is comprised of 15-inch and 12-inch VCP (vitrified clay pipe). A portion (from manhole 19 to manhole 14) of the existing sewer line will be replaced with approximately 1,100 feet of new 12-inch VCP. The new sewer will integrate into the existing system The sewer line improvement will require the rehabilitation and replacement of at least 6 manholes. The sewer line improvement would be constructed in conjunction with the Big Canyon Country Club pond filling and storm drain improvements. Opportunities for Public Review: Interested persons are invited to review the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, including studies and/or exhibits relating to the proposed project, and submit comments. The City of Newport Beach prior to final action on the roF�ed project will consider these documents and all comments received. A copy of the Draft Initial Study/MitigaPN�v eci�atitn(Uated documents are available for review at the following location. �+ E! iiiiii Newport Beach City Hall Planning Department MAR 0 5 20M 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 NARY L, YILLE, Glelk-RMI&l �1 �1 �_ DEPUTY If you wish to appeal the appropriateness or the adequacy % e r Mitigated Negative Declaration, your comments should be submitted in writing prior to the close of the public review period stated above. Your comments should specifically identify what environmental impacts you believe would result from the project, why they are significant, and what changes or mitigation measures you believe should be adopted to eliminate or reduce these impacts. If you have any questions or would like further information, please contact Javier S. Garcia, Senior Planner at (949) 644-3206. Date of Publication: March 5, 2001 WITY OF NEWPORT BEACHW NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NIITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Newport Beach, has prepared a Revised Draft Initial StudyWfigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed project described below. The Draft Initial Study has determined that if the proposed conditions and mitigation measures are applied to the project there will not be a significant effect on the environment. The City therefore intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Revised Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been recirculated for a 30-day public review period in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Project Name: Big Canyon Country Club Project — Pond Fill, Storm Drain & Sewer Trunk Line Proiect Location: The site is located at 1 Big Canyon Drive within the Big Canyon Country Club golf course in the City of Newport Beach. Project Proponent: Big Canyon Country Club,1 Big Canyon Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92663 Responsible A eg ncv: Orange County Sanitation District,10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Public Review Period: March 5, 2001 to April 3, 2001 Project Description: The application is a request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. Improvements include drainage pipes underground and above surface that will connect to the existing storm drains, removal and construction of golf cart paths, adjustment of manholes to grade, and relocation of an existing water line. The pond, once filled, will be landscaped and replaced with a putting green to compliment the existing golf course uses and the driving range depth expanded to provide additional distance. The project is located at 1 Big Canyon Drive within the Big Canyon Country Club Golf Course in Newport Beach. The site contains an existing pond approximately 0.64 acres in size. Surrounding and nearby properties include the golf course and single-family residential to the north of the pond. Currently, the pond flows into an existing storm drain system that carries the water to the bay. With the proposed filling of the pond, the existing storm drain system will remain. However, instead of the water flowing through the pond, it will flow through pipes to be placed in the area of the pond that will connect to the existing storm drain system. The project also involves partial replacement of an Orange County Sanitation OCSD (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length The sewer line begins east of MacArthur Boulevard and extends through Big Canyon Golf Course to just west of Jamboree Road. The existing sewer line is comprised of 15-inch and 12-inch VCP (vitrified clay pipe). A portion (from manhole 19 to manhole 14) of the existing sewer line will be replaced with approximately 1,100 feet of new 12-inch VCP. The new sewer will integrate into the existing system The sewer line improvement will r quire the rehabilitation and replacement of at least 6 manholes. The sewer line improvement would be constructed in conjunction with thtBig Canyon Country Club pond filling and storm drain improvements. Opportunities for Public Review: Interested persons are invited to review the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, including studies and/or exhibits relating to the proposed project, and submit comments. The City of Newport Beach prior to final action on the proposed project will consider these documents and all comments received. A copy of the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and 'Jowmats �ab�r review at the following location: (� Newport Beach City Hall Planning Department MAR 0 5 '001 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 GYyARY L. GRANVILLE, Clerk -Retarder If you wish to appeal the appropriateness or the adequacy of the Draft Mitigated Negatrr a ec ion, your coat Ee;nts should be submitted in writing prior to the close of the public review period stated above. Your comments should specifically identify what environmental impacts you believe would result from the project, why they are significant, and what changes or mitigation measures you believe should be adopted to eliminate or reduce these impacts. If you have any questions or would like further information, please contact Javier S. Garcia, Senior Planner at (949) 644-3206. Date of Publication: March 5, 2001 OF NEWPORT BEACH NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Newport Beach, has prepared a Revised Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed project described below. The Draft Initial Study has determined that if the proposed conditions and mitigation measures are applied to the project there will not be a significant effect on the environment. The City therefore intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Revised Draft Initial StudyWtigated Negative Declaration has been recirculated for a 30-day public review period in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Project Name: Big Canyon Country Club Project — Pond Fill, Storm Drain & Sewer Trunk Line Proiect Location: The site is located at 1 Big Canyon Drive within the Big Canyon Country Club golf course in the City of Newport Beach. Project Proponent: Big Canyon Country Club, 1 Big Canyon Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92663 Responsible Agencv: Orange County Sanitation District, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Public Review Period: March 5, 2001 to April 3, 2001 Project Descrintion: The application is a request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. Improvements include drainage pipes underground and above surface that will connect to the existing storm drains, removal and construction of golf cart paths, adjustment of manholes to grade, and relocation of an existing water line. The pond, once filled, will be landscaped and replaced with a putting green to compliment the existing golf course uses and the driving range depth expanded to provide additional distance. The project is located at 1 Big Canyon Drive within the Big Canyon Country Club Golf Course in Newport Beach. The site contains an existing pond approximately 0.64 acres in size. Surrounding and nearby properties include the golf course and single-family residential to the north of the pond. Currently, the pond flows into an existing storm drain system that carries the water to the bay. With the proposed filling of the pond, the existing storm drain system will remain. However, instead of the water flowing through the pond, it will flow through pipes to be placed in the area of the pond that will connect to the existing storm drain system. The project also involves partial replacement of an Orange County Sanitation OCSD (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. The,sewer line begins east of MacArthur Boulevard and extends through Big Canyon Golf Course to just west of Jamboree Road. The existing sewer line is comprised of 15-inch and 12-inch VCP (vitrified clay pipe). A portion (from manhole 19 to manhole 14) of the. existing sewer line will be replaced with approximately 1,100 feet of new 12-inch VCP. The new sewer will integrate into the existing system. The sewer line improvement will require the rehabilitation and replacement of at least 6 manholes. The sewer line improvement would be constructed in conjunction with the Big Canyon Country Club pond filling and storm drain improvements. Opportunities for Public Review: Interested persons are invited to review the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, including studies and/or exhibits relating to the proposed project, and submit comments. The City of Newport Beach prior to final action on the proposed project will consider these documents and all comments received. A copy of the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and related documents are available for review at the following location: Newport Beach City Hall Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 If you wish to appeal the appropriateness or the adequacy of the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, your comments should be submitted in writing prior to the close of the public review period stated above. Your comments should specifically identify what environmental impacts you believe would result from the project, why they are significant, and what changes or mitigation measures you believe should be adopted to eliminate or reduce these impacts. If you have any questions or would like further information, please contact Javier S. Garcia, Senior Planner at (949) 644-3206. Date of Publication: March 5, 2001 n u HODGE AND ASSOCIATES MEMORANDUM DATE: March 2, 2001 TO: Mr. Scott Morgan, State Clearinghouse k FROM: Cheryle L. Hodge Hodge & Associates SUBJEC City of Newport Beach - Recirculated CEQA Documentation for proposed Big Canyon Country Club Project (SCH # 2000051118) On behalf of my client, City of Newport Beach, Planning Department, I have enclosed fifteen (15) copies of the CEQA documentation (Revised Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration) for the above,referenced project. I have also enclosed fifteen (15) copies of the Notice of Completion form. The draft CEQA document has been published for a 30-day review period that will commence on March 5, 2001 and conclude on April 3, 2001. lfyou have any questions and/or comments regarding the attached document, please give me a call at (949) 661-6488 or Jay Garcia, City of Newport Beach at (949) 644-3206. Thanks. Enclosure cc: Jay Garcia, City of Newport Beach, Planning Department. 24040 CAMINO DEL AVION • SUITE A-247 • MONARCH BEACH, CA 92629 • TEL: 949/661.6488 • FAX- 949/661-3791 i NORE OF COMPLETION ICC:• !.4� rer trunk line Parifir_Cna.ct Hiahwav AMMr011TS �/� AAKWAVt N/%� SCAOO" N�i stilt! we �- luPelemeM/lWseeuant OWA: Not OMr Awtt OetneheM _ Urly CNN Pant Inter !CM Ne.t WMr iA ", �- Pan« OeetrntetN Dos" #111 _� Orah its -� OWAW PONST ..............................................-.----».-----------.-.-------.-------------.-- ►YiikAG>l9C.M — ONNtM Men tAwAr4 4"Ifle Pen Rasana AnnonalNw — 0"10 Plan Amenehtent MeetN Men heteM pleM+Mel♦n ent asf0 PNn 0MtNtt1 CNnnynny Plan .� Mannas Nrn owwo~ UM PNnet fan Men -� Caeeut ►erect r LIM Drytwan' $�ottr (radnv Pgrmit ----------------------- ---------------------l9ltlLel::ML@SlEi!tdnn==---- 1 AeeleeMiM: vim u ONrge: N.h.^_ Agree Agree— MWeMee-� Water Fa ewes• -� T4�nyN4SlM: wawnhNe� TTyyepe ,- Commercial. se,h.—_ IMwMM: ANee�_ iNletePeee Weete, Mne1R""`�'-" N.h.- Agrees- awowv ee_ -`_ Treatment: Nye „MWeYenel W*;NOUe Waste: OMNt Type h Mini" W1 --Recreational Pond Fill, Storm Drain & Sewer Trunk Line Project AasthNN/NpW 'air, tort! jam,, Mean - QWWV „-s� Roll eMeA" setente -e'AenasMSNal/NN1N4w CeasW Zane MIWe setyyeerPeetatlas DreMNielAieelitten ReNwaen/Pabe NneeMtlA+irerarlrea _ henemNNeea —" seilre lyetNRa PNgel Paved se sewer coewtg Pgroet l�itM/Pi08 ""We".a Sall ireotwCertteeatNrw04eini Salts WMte OeeteWAaleneg .v ��ea�o/asp«ease TnrM/MeWetian ,� Veia4lNw WNar OWhry W41e1 luePlylijreynewetN $wetllndabpurn M-WiMare ;4-Orewth m#WWi Lane Uea C.trrry"va, sMetat 01 ---------------------------------------- ----------------------- -------------------------- Existing golf cour__s_e_with pond and golf uses/ zoning: recreation, general plan: open space twAUAUNAMN ----S t'C? 1ij'�Y:I;-----------•---•----------------------- -- Reviewing Agsnaies Cheoldist • • 4r Resources Aosrtey KEY Boating A Waterways S = Document sent by lead agency _ Coastal Commission X = Document sent by SCH Coasts Conservancy V = Suggested distribution _ Colorado River Board Conservation S Fish lk Gans _ Forestry t Fire Protection _ Office of Historic Preservation Environments Protection Agency a— Parks i Recreation Air Resources Bard Raelamatlon Board California Waste Management _ S.F. Bay Conservation 4 Development Commission Board _ Water Rasources IOWR) SWRCB: Clean water Grants Business. Trenalowardon i Mousing SWRCB: Doha Unit Aeronoutics SWRCB: Wow Quality _ California Highway Patrol SWRCB: Water Rights !� CALTRANS District a 12 �S Regional WQCB a Snnta Ana Department of Transportation Planning (headquarters) t ) _ Housing i Community Development Youth At Aduk Corrections Food i Apfarrltun Corrections Meath i wafts Independent Colnmlealers t Offices Health Services Energy Commission _ state A Construct Services Native American Heritage Genera Services Commission OLA ischoois) Public Utilities Commission _ Santa Monice Mountains Conservancy Land@ Commission _State _ Tshoo Reglw* Planning Agency S Other US Army Corps of Engineers US Fish & Wildlife Service Public Review Period (l) be titled in by Lard Agency) Starting Date M n (• C,) CJ r ZC O ( signature C� � Ending Dots r J-� i? is .� , I CY-, Date % / I /G f Lead Agtnay (Complete if applicable): For SCH Use Only: Consulting Firm: Hodge & Associates Date Received at SCH Address: 24040 Camino del vices, Date Review Stan& City/State/Zip: Monarch Beach, CA 92bZ9 pate to Agencies Contact: Cheryle L. Hodge Date to SCH Phone: ( 949 ) 661-6488 Clearance Date Notes: Applicant: Big Canyon Country Club Address: 1 Bic Canyon Drive City/Ststs/Zip: Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone:) A4g ) 823-6915 Big Canyon Country Club Project Pond Fill, Storm Drain & Sewer Trunk Line 1 Big Canyon Drive, Newport Beach Proiect Description The application is a request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing pond and construction of associated improvements. Improvements include drainage pipes underground and above surface that will connect to the existing storm drains, removal and construction of golf cart paths, adjustment of manholes to grade, and relocation of an existing water line. The pond, once filled, will be landscaped and replaced with a putting green to compliment the existing golf course uses and the driving range depth expanded to provide additional distance. The project is located at 1 Big Canyon Drive within the Big Canyon Country Club Golf Course in Newport Beach. The site contains an existing pond approximately 0.64 acres in size. Surrounding and nearby properties include the golf course and single-family residential to the north of the pond. Currently, the pond flows into an existing storm drain system that carries the water to the bay. With the proposed filling of the pond, the existing storm drain system will remain. However, instead of the water flowing through the pond, it will flow through pipes to be placed in the area of the pond that will connect to the existing storm drain system. The project also involves partial replacement of an Orange County Sanitation OCSD (OCSD) 15-inch sewer line. The existing 15-inch sewer line is part of the Big Canyon Off -Site Trunk Sewer that was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. The sewer line begins east of MacArthur Boulevard and extends through Big Canyon Golf Course to just west of Jamboree Road. The existing sewer line is comprised of 15-inch and 12-inch VCP (vitrified clay pipe). A portion (from manhole 19 to manhole 14) of the existing sewer line will be replaced with approximately 1,100 feet of new 12-inch VCP. The new sewer will integrate into the existing system. The sewer line improvement will require the rehabilitation and replacement of at least 6 manholes. The sewer line improvement would be constructed in conjunction with the Big Canyon Country Club pond filling and storm drain improvements. February 14, 2001 Project no.: 9930 Modification Hearing RECEIVED BY Project: HAGESTAD RESIDENCE PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Location: City Council Chamber AM FEB 2 0 2001 PM City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard ---- 7'8 9-101"1 12 T 2 3 4 6 6 Newport Beach, CA I I I I I I i l l l l Attendees: ,fey:Garcia, Planning Department, City of Newport Beach Faisal Jurdi, Building Department, City of Newport Beach Gil Wong, Public Works Department, City of Newport Beach Russell Toepfer, Robert Hidey Architects 1. Toepfer met with the Modifications Committee of the City of Newport Beach to review the application for modification to allow the encroachment of the Mechanical Room into the 15'- 0" rear setback of #19 Hermitage (Lot 83, Tract 7223). 2. The only neighbor present was David Vorhees, representing the Big Canyon Country Club; he offered no comments or objections. 3. Toepfer briefly explained that the area encroaching into the setback is not living space; is mostly underground and not visible from other adjacent properties; and is partially hidden by existing landscape. 4. The committee members had no objections to the modification request. However, they did make the following comments: a) The building may not encroach any more than the 9'-6" currently allowed by the modification; b) The zoning code requires a minimum 5'-0" security fence around the swimming pool/spa, measured from the -level of the golf course behind #23/Lot 81; c)• The footings for the new retaining wall along the golf course should be located below the existing sewer lines in the adjacent easement. Cc: Attendees John & Merry Hagestad Chris Dyer, Dyer Company John Copeland, Dyer Company Adam Toal, Toal Engineering David Tardiff, Landscape Architect Diane Hussey, RHA A R C 11 1 1 1 C I II R I 6 PIAN-NING 7585 lad[ Caw Dilu, Split 700, Sttd(, CA 97619•I919.6SS.ISf011 919.6313M 260) C.twda Mai, 2" Float, Su RIYOt, CA 9481. M.717.7SS21 9 975.717.29)9 W •W W. R 0.11 E -R 1-11-1 0 E P C 0 M • • Page 1 of 1 Garcia, Jay From: Cheryle Hodge [hodgeandassoc@earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 7:32 PM To: jgarcia@city.newport-beach.ca.us Subject: Fw: Big Canyon CEQA Documentation ----- Original Message ---- From: Team Tomko To: hodgeandassoc(a)earthlink.net Cc: Tomko. Mark Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 4:25 PM Subject: Big Canyon CEQA Documentation Cheryle, I just got back into town and happened to stop by the office for a couple of hours and found this CEQA Documentation. I quickly reviewed the document this afternoon. The document is very well done. A few changes that I recommend are: 1. Page 1, last paragraph, you abbreviated the Orange County Sanitation District as OCSD and on other pages it is abbreviated as District. Either abbreviation is fine, however since there are several agencies that use District as an abbreviation I recommend that you use OCSD throughout the CEQA documents. I probably used District in the Project Description I gave you. 2. Page 1, last line. Change pipeline to either sewer line or VCP. in this instance I would use vitrified clay pipe (VCP). 3. Page 2, 1st line. 12-nch should be 12-inch. I would change this line to the longer version found elsewhere in the document. 'replaced with approximately 1,100 feet of 12-inch VCP or PVC pipe." 4. Project Description. 3rd paragraph 6th line. Change 15-inch and 12-inch pipeline to 15-inch and 12-inch VCP. 5, Project Description. 3rd paragraph 8th line. Change 12-nch to 12-inch. I apologize if I made those errors in the Project Description I gave you. If possible would you send us two copies of the CEQA document when it is distributed for the 30-day public review. Have a wonderful weekendl Mark Tomko Orange County Sanitation District mtomkoe.ocsd.com 10/31/2001 • • BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH J AN 2001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 19 PROJECT REVIEW REQUEST C1V DONCH A >fORN1A Date: January 18, 2001 Staff Planner: Jay Garcia, ext. 3206 _ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) X PUBLIC WORKSAMLITIES - Attn: Mike Sinacori _ FIRE DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. X BUILDING/GRADING DEPARTMENT _ COMMUNITY SERVICES X OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Robin Clauson _ MARINE SAFETY _ REVENUE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (Commercial Development Only) APPLICATION OF: I City of Ne ort Beach CONTACT: Jay Garcia (949) 644-3206 FOR: Mitigated Negative Declaration DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing artificial pond approximately 28,000 square feet in size and construction of associated improvements. Additionally, the replacement of an existing 1,100 linear feet of County Sanitation District sewer line is also proposed. LOCATION: 1 Big Canyon Drive (Golf Course) REPORT REQUESTED BY: January 24, 2001 COMMISSION REVIEW (Tentative): Check all that apply: ❑ No comments on the project as presented. ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements are not expected to alter the project design. ❑ Recommended conditions of approval are attached. ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements or the attached conditions of approval will substantially impact or alter the design of the project. ❑ I contacted the applicant on to: O schedule an appointment for Code review, O discuss the following (attach separate sheet if necessary): ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (O see CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT REVIEW REQUEST Date: January 18, 2001 Staff Planner: Jay Garcia, ext. 3206 _ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) X PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITIES - Attn: Mike Sinacori _ FIRE DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. X BUILDING/GRADING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES X OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Robin Clauson MARINE SAFETY _ REVENUE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (Commercial Development Only) APPLICATION OF: I City of Ne ort Beach CONTACT: I Jay Garcia (949) 644-3206 FOR: Mitigated Negative Declaration DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the approval of a Grading Permit for the Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain project. The project involves the placement of fill materials within an existing artificial pond approximately 28,000 square feet in size and construction of associated improvements. Additionally, the replacement of an existing 1,100 linear feet of County Sanitation District sewer line is also proposed. LOCATION: 1 Big Canyon Drive (Golf Course) REPORT REQUESTED BY: January 24, 2001 COMMISSION REVIEW (Tentative): Check all that apply: ❑ No comments on the project as presented. ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements are not expected to alter the project design. ❑ Recommended conditions of approval are attached. ❑ Application of Standard Code requirements or the attached conditions of approval will substantially impact or alter the design of the project. ❑ I contacted the applicant on to: C3 schedule an appointment for Code review, O discuss the following (attach separate sheet if necessary): ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (O see attached): Signature: Ext. Date: 01/19/2001 11:45 94966137991 HODGE • PAGE 03 DATE: January 17, 2001 HODGE AND ASSOCIATES MEMORANDUM TO: Mark Tomko, Orange County Sanitation District 1-0 FROM: Cheryle L, Hodge, Hodge & Associates SUBJECT: Big Canyon Country Club Storm Drain Improvement Project - CEQA Documentation For your in-house staff review, I've enclosed a copy of the CEQA documentation prepared for the above referenced project. Please review the enclosed document and provide any comments you may have to me by January 26, 2001, Comments can be either faxed to me at (949) 661-3791 or e-mailed hod et andassoc@earthlink.net . I anticipate that the subject CEQA document will be published for a 30-day public review by the end of this month. If you should have any questions regarding the IS/MND please call me at (949) 661-6488 or Mike Sinacori with the City of Newport Beach at (949) 644-3342. Thanks. Attachment cc: Jay Garcia, City of Newport Beach, Planning Dept, 24040 CAMINO DEL AVION • SUITE A-247 . MONARCH BEACH. CA S2629 • TEL: 949/661.6488 • FAX: 949/661-3791 January 9, 2001 Mr. Javier Garcia, AICP Planning Department City of Newport Beach Post Office Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658 RE: Big Canyon Permit Dear Jay: RECEIVED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF NFW0n#'T r1EACH AM JAN 10 2001 PM 718, 9110,11,181112, 3141616 I. SNYDER LANGSTON I am in receipt of notification of Plan Check Expiration. I had mentioned this to you at a previous meeting. You instructed me to send same to you and you would inform the Building Department of the reasons for the delay. I sincerely appreciate your efforts to obtain extensions. Sincerely, &W�K�,41 Bill Langston WEL/cn Enclosures al4ilk 0- Creating Value Through Leadership in Real Estate and Construction d �- P(au ckok .f & P'L-A -Kt r)e` f I E( (/ 1-1-7-oi 17962 Cowan, Irvine, California 92614 Phone 949.863.9200 Fax 949.863.10B7 v vsnyder-langston com '0'/01/63/2001 'lb: :i! 114-/'L0-`JJJ8 tilU UANYUN U U HAUL 0.i 12/2812000 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 13UILDING DEPARTMENT 3300 NEWPORT BLVD. P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 (949) 644-3275 BEARDSLEYJEFF ONE BIG CANYON DR NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 SUBJECT: PLAN CHECK EXPIRATION DATE ADDRESS: 1 BIG CANYON DR Our records indicate your Plan Check Number(s) 1882-2000 will expire on 01/21/2001 based on limitations set forth in Section 304.4 of the Uniform Administrat ve Code. You must obtain a building permit or request an extension by writing to the Building Director prior to the expiration date and show that circumstances beyond your control have prevented you from obtaining the permit. If you.allow your application to expire, you must pick up any drawings that we have in our office within ten (10) days after the date of expiration. After that'time, we will assume you have no further interest In the plans and dispose of them. To continue this project after the expiration date, a new application and pans must be submitted and new fees must be paid. For further information, please contact a permit technician at (949) 644-3288. Very truly yours, BUILDING DFPARTMENT For Jay Elbettar, P.E., C.B.O., Director M- Permit Technician y c-malb cab—blg@citynecvport-beach.caus • webpaget wwwcityniwport-beach.ca.us/building I � "' " I ___:_ , � , , ��,__ ,7 , \ , , � �,\� , \ \ ,,, I � I \ 1�', ,�\\, x , 1��, q,�� -1 , , I I I - I I I , ��, �tL' rol, ��___11�,_ - -1 I , ? I , I = I =l � m I L�i 1 -�_4 1 1 co `=` I U) = � .�, = = � � � cm� = 0- (= 1­ � � w � (= = � � � � ::� I � � 1­ � = � C) m � � � = : - I I �� oiIII, I - I "I'll I I I I I W , i ,\\ � 1�g , \ I I \ � la \ I I V� i I ,/ \ � I I \ \ /// \,-11 / I \ N \\ � I .... 'N\ \ \\ \ \\� N\\'\\ \ I � / \ ,` N� N I , I 1 .5 � :7,� �) r.__11 1\ \ � ��\�\"g . 'm l, I, ,�� \� I �\ 1 \ I � � I I \ ­k / / \ _"_I­`l ,12o.-, I. I I .11, ,7l, / � '76 I,\ \�\\ I , �,, 1\\\N\ I ,,, _11 !111 / I I " , " N - I _11,-, _� / ____._ \� , 11 ", No' ))/ , 11 , � I \ \, \\v % 1\ � ,:\\ � ,__�\ \ 1, I 11, \1 I, I � \ I� \� IN\ � �,, , /X �'�, ,__, \ \ \ N`�, II I \ ", I I � \\ \ \ I I ­_� I ,1"?O, �17 A _5_� , ) I \ � , � � ��l I 1�/\ � I/ �, 1�1 \ \' S/1- I �\\`l ,,O "'N �, ... )(�'11 ( � I, \,"\ ,,, CY� \ \1 \ 11 'I , , \ I'VA '\\\,\ \ I M \ x 1� I "aiz -,, __`_," ,� A � �, (1 I . I 'TEE I � \ \ \ '\ v � /,II, N) 1 /, � ,\, 1 I I \ I \11, ", , , � �\ �, - � , 'I , I -I L '- ') )'I \ 14��,I,\ 11_1,��, �\� ---, "1 - )J/ " ,� - I / I . � \ I � I \ % N I \ Z ;� �7 �, I ,-r' I / "N 11 � \\ I'\\ ,\R\ 01 I , ,X '\ � � 1 -4 J` I I , , 1, I, \� ,,��_, � / ,� S� %\ , , )\ I - \ � \ \ I, %, \ ", \ \�111"\� _� \ `N\ / M ll, , ,�, ­ I \ I , � F,9,4 I, \ 1. - 1� � 1�,\%, , \1,1�\',,�\�N\� ; "', I ), / \\ 1\ -N,� 'W , \,,,� N, , _�� N \, -"\, � I`� I\ I f - � , , , \ I I '�, I 1-1 I - � � " -_ \ I>, 1 ,12!�Z9 1 11 \ \\�"\�,, I � " N,NN�"\\\' \\0 JN N " "* , I I �, � \ \ , -,n. Xx \\ - , � � Z", ! \ IR11, I X'6`3.7'� � 0� I i K \ - N`\ -, 0 V16�, � �� I \11 Avg\X '� '� "' 1, _1� i \ _�_ �� I I , / /I . \o,\\ � / ,�/ I/ I, �� -,If �, / I `�N �'�411' , ,,\ '� , i 7 ,�, `,� i I `,, / � _ 1\ i /, \� / \ I �� J, � . 1011 L\' \ ", - v- � I , " I IN \ � g\\,\\', \ "N -1 I NNNN 'I, ) � " \ I � \ I I \ '� ,� , I 11, "� 1�­ IN �-Wrl I I I 1 ( ------ :� I I N, I \� \, \ ,"\,\\ \',\,�� I ,,��j z ,,,,3 ,\ \�\: , \ 1�� \ � I \ N, ,� V�-"\ �\"­� N�,� \IINWI�N I -t - �� / - I i _,_�Jl � � \� x .32 1 \ , `N�\� N , �,\ N 14IN � ,\ i_I__;, )I"\ � i, k� I, 1, ,,, , �, , I � ,` \,-j ���,\\ \ , I ��/ I , I �� , %,k ,-�% \ � I I 1 I, \ \ \% I, \\,\ \! � \� I- I , V, , ,'X'�, �lN \ , \ � � � I ll � i N \ , ,� ,�\ � , , ) , , - I I ' N 'M\ t \\ & " \ I. I , N\� N,,\, ON \I \ x r, I \� ,\ � \, I �7 - , "m _E_ I , .. N,� 1� -', \ -U I S l / � \ � I, Ii, , , ,\ I, , ,,I I 1, � \,�, � -, N � \\ � \ M\ , I "\ \,I�_ , 1 , ­!�-�'�Y"'J'�,� , � I � \ \ - - I \ � I / \ � m� � , I I I - , i � \ " I � � I ":% , ,\ \ I N - � � \ � � �� � I \ � N N\ , �� " t x'IN- , \ , , \ , , �1 , _;"",� - `_/ '* �' --A I\ \1 \ --o \ \ \ � , j I � I k -,�v, I)\ x, qa.\, , � � , � ,1� \ N\%": \ / �, \ \ I�� � , \ \ \ l , � � I , , � I " ! 1, � �k \ , k ",I", , I a I � \ \ �, i \ \ ( I \, `N�i\V ,\ >1 � -, , I � ,/ I \\ x \ k\ I V \ ___ I I I ,I 'A�, , � 51 i _1:1� \ I " I I \\� NNI ,� ,'� � - _� - 1\ \ � 6�1 k�,, \�� \ '2 i , U . I I I __\� . , �, , �z ­ \ � , \ \ ,� � i � � � \, [I � -� \, ,\\ � iI12'1�74 N I/ \ I \N X, , \ I I \ - ) � � I I f \, \ z � " " . \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \\ ... R I \ \ �\ . I � I 1'/ % \�', \ 5 \ � � ­ " " I ,I 2o.'r , III - \, - ) ,)6 ),� I l� � \\x , \ - \ �,'� " I I I 'I �I. N� \ 1 J2 � �,, ", \ \\.�\, I , , ,, I � ) � �', 1,� \ , � 1,\ l � �� )�, " � \ , � -1, \ \ �/ '�z , � ,-\ \ \ , , I I % , ) x \ I � ___N, � \ � M 1� _� \ \ ) � "'I � \� \' \ �� ( � ,/,I- / - )� \ \ ,�- x � � \ A ,,t�,(.P/ ,\, \ / % "'. � \,I- , (I� / � _-�11 , , X , ... j '11 ,5� , � ,)�' 11 ,\�:,., , 11�1 It k 022.,�,,-, // ,-j \ I�i J I N f � \ I\ � ) \ � � � � I � J,\ � " \\\, \ \ I. ( y � t , 11 � \ /I / I � \ k\ \ � _I.1v \ \ N., \ ,,, I � , ,/) / I \ \1 / � \\ ) 1, /., 1 __/ �N 1, � ",N \ "', "I, 1� �, _J �. I - I \ \ \ � " \�\-,,_-:�� ^ / / � I I " l�� , \ , " \ \ \ \ � ,�� 1� /' / " - / 11 . � \ ', I, " \ \ �11 I I 8I 4' ( � / 1 "!�____Z�:­___l \ � I \ � 1. I .I.I., �i,-, \ I " , , \\g\�\)\� � \ \`\""NN\ \ A / /", _ \� i, � �\�l J, ( \<_ / x 1 22,1 \ I � ,� \\ ,\ \,\ ' `,, \ ( I, 11 \ � / � ,� / \,��53 06" - I I \ \��, &\n��,- x g\\\,' N __ ,,, " N�\ I �, -1 \ \ \ " `,-I... Q � `11/ If � , \��----- \ ��, �\ ,\ - I, \\ � ,,, \ - �\ 11 \ " \Xll\\�,N I \ I - 0�! 6, � \ , \ _,` _', \1 X N \1 X \ \ `,� 11 \\If \ \ t--�\ , I N, \ 11 \ I \ \ - , N, X � \ \ I , y, � " 0� I: ( I ,_1 I � X\ I \ Q � .�\\\\ \ , 1�� N\NNN ­`___ \_ "`� I, I ( �, �l �.1,-:,\'­---) �"/T ' " I `I�:�,�\O\\\'N\ 1\0�\\\\\\ , N\ , ,\ \\\\\ I \ I I � Q , m �'? " r-­< � I � I -1 � N I \ - , � _Z 11 IN, , \N N`_1 - �K � \ �_ ­_ �',---,I�,.�', \ � \ \ �,,, I -, - _�� �1, " M�,­ . -,>, \\, N, , , I _�, � N _\11 11 , �' \�"-,�\ IN. f- N­t--,e,� \� -', ! 1_� -," 'N-, I I" - , - ,\ \\ "' \� , I I '�� \ \ \ I ��- �� \I-N I Z, )�� ", \ � I \` \ , 1­� I \ I \ , I I� N, I, � '\ N`I\,,,,,� \ `-�\, I ,, \ I X'%\ - I,- --� I, " ,� �� I \ \ N' �� � ", ,��\11 .� A\, \ N'\ I ) - "I ... �� , R \ �%�) I\ � I , X 0- r ,I _\ �_ A �, \ \ \ _), � : I __ , \ � 1, \1 IN I \\ -- N"_1 - N _::�_)I/o �, I l,�\, N ­� ­11. I �1�1 , \ , � N \\ N, -� -_ ---,,, , , , ,\%,�\� \ ,� \ \1'�,\,IN\I \ X- \\,\ I) -\,- I _�\�\�X\X\�\ \, \ NNNN \ \ \�, \ \ ,\. L 1� __`-, k __­NN I I 1,N"J � \�\\ m I " 1, III� IN, , - \\ 7-) 1 1 M �� -IN �, \N I N \, � - -I 7 I - � �, ( I MV,q �,\\�\�,\\,IW', , \ \ \ \ I � IL I. I \ \ "N' 1�_ I " , I, ,,,,�;� -, � �_ �___, , '! 22. a3 , \Nx\1'\ L� \ \"A\, � I �\ � " � \�,I', 1, \ i�,, �;\ , . I _", , t , I " , I \ \ NNIN 1� � _� II,I � , '�, I( `� \ `�I, ", \\ '\ \ " \ I � \ \ I L \ I \ ,�, �\X�\U,,� A ` V ,,,, ,,�', �,�,)k l, �, \ \ A � \ N_ , � \,� � zziz�7 --, I-- ---,N, , ,,,\ � \ 1\ Q � - , \ '\ \ I �_ \, , I � I \X\\ \,�,a,\�\',Il %\,\ \�Ax, _% I \1 I I \, ,I I " ,\ IN, � ,�,,,� \ , I, \ , , , \ N, �, ,x, -,�,j , I \ x , \ ,-\I , - _ I ,� , , �\ . \ , , -1, \ -'I, �, �V, , , \ � \ " \\\ ,\\kl'\� � \ \, \ \ 'N ", I V � \� I \ I \ \_j I --I-? NI I \ �� "I \ "' N �� I I - 11 l, � �\ J\, \\� \ �, \ NO\\ , , , �\ , I , I I \ � �� \x \, ,N,� N' � I \ 1, ",, I , \ \, ,_� �, I XX\N\\\"'1ll \ \ \ \ \ \ , \-1 ,\ '-,,\' ,` , _\ I� \',\%,� ,,,,, \,, NI,,� � I \ � \� �� � \ I N, \ \ / - \ \\ \\I, I � �_ \ , " 1\11\ , \Wk \1 TX, 1�_l-"I 11 � \ I A\ , N I I I �� 7 7 \� ,'-\,, , , 12117,1�l\ 'M , \ I v �, � , - \ I \ 11 x \ IN, ; \ 11 ) , , \ \ I , \w N I\ \ I ., , "- %NX\ ,�,k`, \ , � , 'I \`� " IN \,\� � \ � I \_ \ "�__ � I \\ I �\ \\, � \,�,x \\ � \, , I \ � � \ I � \ \% \1 , �, \ \N' \'I " \ Nil "', NN, ,�)-, \ I I \ I �� � I N v � ,I� \ ,\ \ ��\ �� I , \ \ \�& " 1, \ I \ ) , \ \__NN , \\� �, \ � � \\ \ X\0\ ,�,� , \ � , � , I, ,\\w, ,\�, " _ , \ �\ � \ \ \ �) ", \0 \' \) � ��\ \ \ \\� " , \\N�A I 1W �\ \\ \ , _� " \ \\ \ � , \_� I / \ I 1'__/ "., /,- � \ \ I, X\,LL \A I x �\ \ ' \ \ �\ \ \ , " \ , \ I l �\_ \ , � I \x " � �, I �, \1 \ I, --) - , �'\ "� -11, I \ \ \ \ , _�, \ _L % I I \ - III � I \\ L ), \ \ I,--- "'I, , , \\ \ � ,� \ _\_� I-, I I \\ -N, , \ --S \ - \ I \ ,\I,\\\ , N. \ - M\ I \ 11 1, I I,- `I1 I I I, N,,N -, I\ �� I N \ \ l� ­ 1, XX \\\\ I , �\ �� - I " 77.4�,- I �\,\�� 1\ "\ \ - _�� 11 \ �_­­­__ ', \ 9 ­-N,\ ,�_ z� -, � \ A \ N, I .1 \ �, ­11_� _.____��,,�\,\ IN N`N �, U II \ (3) \ � \ \', \ - _.­ \ 11 *1 NNN, IN, ,� "­., � \ \ N, _,,' I, ­ N. .IN �_,, �,­-,-�,�,_- 'r � ,-) N, \\ I _ 1� �:-.�_ � � .S�, __ \\\\� \\ \ .-) ., l 11 �', \,\\ \ IN, I \ "'I" ,\� k � N N �1_ `,, N, ,� . - I I `,.,�_�­.­,__ I-"-,- - I, \l, � \\�" 'N 'I., �,,­, NN NN, \ ­ "' ,.z � --- :'X\\��"`_7::5: `_­1'_ ' � -,- ,�� ")-\ Il� \ \__ ,��, N�l ," � �' I- \�\ - I " , I' - - , � I ...... \ \ .1, ,��, "', \ N__ --- // "11- ­� ,\ " \' --- \ , I \ , ", , .�,, N' ,�__.._._____,_ ----.,- " I � � \��kv �\ _� IN, k , N\ x7 2 ,)�� '� N \ IN � N, � ",,e ,;// - \\\ \ ,-�, \, N'N -IN N­­N. �' _� \ NN, , " \ /­­-�­,__­� / C I'I'l � " ,IN I _��11�,/ `-, ,��111�1 / _, � I �� " l, I ,I / ,-.., � I I I � I I I . I � I I � I - . I I I I . I - I � I I ��,, � . I . N "',\ ) : ; � I, .- I-----/,- I I i � I I I I � II\ /-, 11 ) -, /I I I I I I I � ,�,, A � i "', i " III I � I - __- - � '�- , I ,,, i '.) \� )_ � I � __�­ i , �� ,�j ��, I � I I � , I I - - 4TI- - � � �/) I I I 1, - 1�11, , �� i�2k---�-, � � I - _-_��, ,____�­�fkl_� _el� . - " I \ I :�z I - � , �, _-�' t �-_,��-- /___1 ,� / I � !Y�___ �j j _�__�� I - I - / - I I ____ - , - _ � �rl, N_', I t " II',,,� I I -, I I . - I I I 11 -1 �__,_�__ 'I " �� � -1,,,-�,' I �, �--_ _��1_7: A_'�� ��__, �� I I- - __z:_ t- �,j ,E_� _(� fl:�7 ,( I � " 11� - - - I I - � � I I - I \ 11 I ""�__ I x , � " _ � "I �, �, , - __ __ ___N_� - 5,11" ,_ 1�_�744 I_� \1._1 I 11 � ,��, - �, I 11�� � I , � I - _-Z I , I 8 q,,.�& ��__ - --�-I;� _. I � I I I - >,�"_\ I --- ,::�� 1� 7- - : � I I �-_�i- -� � , l, " � ., I � , I % \ - I, I 1, � \ - � - I __4 , i��X / I I I . I I . - - "-j , ­,,- I , ? /, , I � I I I I . � I -- K-�- ,��_ '__c , -, I � I I � � i 'N, , \ ,�� � I I � I I - -� , N_,:� ::�,_ / I 11 I � -, ___1 I_ /I I i / � ) ,>, , V , , I I � I I 1--, - � , - :� �, Ill /_ / / ) - ,,,-� � I "I __�_ N , �� , � I - ) � - ,,­/�', `( \ \ � � �\1 --�:--,� - __ - , � i I , I , I _V;�� � ) I 11 I - , \11,1�, �,/ " LN<�� , IN ,�_ ,-:Z- , I - 11 " I I I . I - � I I , , ,l� "a, - - _:_�_ '1Z / I - _� I I I I I , I ,�� I ; Z, j- -:�, --��,7��,�_._ - ­-v �___�Z- - - - __z - -_ I I I I 11 11 I � I I I 1 0 , -7r I - _ - I / / , Z��_ � )_ \� � ,� I �, I I— 'L _1- -- I I � - , , " (,) \ . K I \ -_- I, � � ____ __ - T----� L Tz��,_��'Z� ,� N , ) �, 1, I - , � __ N, A _-, ­ �4 / -,, - � " , I ,I, ", >4 _�_ � - I �_11_ � I--- - _`1 I`lf_� __ ��� - _, --- 1� ,;: - , � - / e I � I - - - , ( 1, ,q ;� -, I'/ : �Y_ -,­ - - -I, - / , ,\"! -, �_ I � -- - - :� , � - - I i / - I I . . I ,, - , '� 'I , ___�' -, INN / I I 1, I - I - I I I '� , ,_ , ) I _��� _ � I I I -, / , . -,7,1 /_ �- 1) \ , -,�_�_ :__ � - - 7-z- _fl�l I \ � I� , i� , � , - I �l 1-- - zx �,�' �s ,_ " _,,a�,,_---% �, I- _�;� __ _� 7 �, � - / I I � I � I - ��t_ �___��__ I >- ", � I I 1� Z-�-- z �__ - , ,:� --- ���-:�� - � I I ` ":�_� 1,1, I I I - __ _:E:�� -- ,__ I'l : -1, I -�-, - - --- \ � I I . __ N -f�-�-!_- - ­ �, I I I I I - � I I _� , 's - g��� �� �__���z __ - � N`,, I N__ \ �_ ` , ;��g ff f� -,,,, � _7_:�: - ; // �_ -_ _-, I `�,_�____ ` � - � � - l�__ _�_,� - - 2 � _/ % , __\I` � -- ,,��I:�f� - _: ���� 1, I I - I 11 ­ ��, \ N , V� -1 � 1) V, lk�o �7 1 1 - - ___._1­ ,_ �=� �� _:E�E�� � ",-\ ��,,, �,- - -� � � - r - \ I ,�, ��Z�� �� \ �k - �F 1� �_, I ... ­ -- . r , �15 1 ��­�_�` ,�� - _� _.- ��..��__�,`,_, I��, �', -1 72. 1� - I , _�� :; -, -,) � , � �,� I , _­ . �_ - .,��k-`) .r I, . k , I, ��_ � �-,! " ,��F-'��E ��� 3_��= ���� Z�'_ % ,�(N�., I __ � � __-_ - -vg����i, ���E t'L: '�-,��1­5�- '�'-� - \ - -11 �\ lv � T,-A� -�.-�-��,,-,�%-,�-,,�-�----�-,-."� _Z, \ � , , --Z�­.� 1�r=,�= - - _.L I �� ,�, I , ,,,, ­,,�,,, , -_ - - \% l _�, " � ,�jI� -�� r ;��­-Izz� ��-==��__A � 1`=� ���.-�-z7�-=-�::-�---�:::"����,�ftI , \�,�,�,75, ,v- \I- - , - - - E�� -, __�___ - , I - ___1____ \,.', N I I :a� t g:-��,g -7E: - � ____ . - I �, � 11 -1 :�� ���95 ��--�� - - ,_ �=,T __ \�<3y� \1 I io� � ?U"j`­ I,- ,I�>�. _,�_� __; �"i�gl �5�__7�::�_ _::�� � �._,I__, ... :W��_-- - � I ��- ;�7-,­ _� - - _______��,_�_.__=74_ � , �'��tz;��- f �,`,\\ IN � - --�7 �:�� ­� ,:t:­�,, I , �___­ , ___ _`�­ __ ___ ".1'1� -� - - '::,----7::::�,--------.----���:z�E�� ! - �:_ 1. /­ I", - I - � .�`�,- ­ " ,,, ,, -t - _:­�__.��� -IN I mv \ , - - � _ __ ,-_-1.1­vN� 'I, IN �L� � - -- -�­:::___::: __._.__.____ �, ��, . -----I---- , N `N, , , \ I I . . ?�� -��,,- -:� ­-­__� _,� , N ,\\� , ", _A_,_`­:!5__ 1.'. ­_­-, I "'j ,,\�_� _`_N,\\ " � - >e­-;:�--�--��- �M.-,_, _�� �_-_,�� _:�� �:� - 7f"'_ ,: -i` ,� __ __ ` ��N 7 1 �_ � 74, 5) I - , -:�-5-- :��--�-- - f :­ ��,-- `�5- -s- - x ) 1-1 V 1, 6,4 I.- ,.,.-., ��_,��,��_­ ��-,�',--,,;�,,--6'::��-------�-" , ­-� -, -7----.-- I� �g, V�­�-__- ,-- , _______, ,� I .-- --, - � - I `1` - I - I - ._�____,_ _._,_____ I "IN, ,11'_1 , ,�, I \ I ,,\ I _)_-) -1 _ ___ ____ __�� I ,__� /` 7 , _:, � _;�, ", . -I-.--.-,--- _� - . 1( I ­ - " , -:::� -- ­-�-_�� -- - __f _ --- '__._ � , ___ ��� --'7� - ',---`,N­ �-___ -, � \\\ I ,-Y , �g�,,�,,�R�h`-,�� - ��_� ,,..-- - - __ , �,,", -I " /� ­1 I 5 . �'�*_- ::�� _., --- ,,, I � - ',� -_ __ �, , "_ - , l" ____ ­7 -- N N I I _'il. � I,, I- �______ I - I NN _� ___ � ( I 11 / � I`- - __ ��_�_�_----- � - ,1. _­` --L, ,,--------,----------.------.--�-�- IN, � ,___­",I�_,,--- ,q -_-. - )11 ­ __ ", _­__ - � -----, 1� ,---.---, - -,:, � 1�1 , '_ :," ,-��-,��­::------- ----,- 1_� 11 ­_ _,7���5�� -,\ �x - -1 ; ) �,,05> __n7__ ��,:__1_1_ I- , ,,, I t �_� - � ,_ �_ V`_ -, _" - � �, I �l-..,.�-"---,,�-�---------,--�-., "_ I - �� _� ­ \ /' '_ � 'I"'.- - I � I - ­ " - - - - -- __._ __ - - - __� -L-7:7_7--� / 7­1 x'165.�) Il,rr­',� , __ - -_ , �,��--;�� - ,��,,��f7.:!:�� ::_ ,:��::��,��-��,� E�::��::��L:::� ,` � ,,,, ,,,,- -- - _­�' � - _ _', . \1 - � , , I- 1__� � __�,,-­ ,,5��, 1, ___1 _11)� "N �=_______ I, I / ) _�---­,_ ______._._ ------- --- -, --, , l" ;,1:1 � - -- - - , :7�,� - <I �, I �J� I I _", "1 -N�\ 'N� /' I, ,_�:�, �, � ; / \�� � IN / IN � , , , � , I / I 1�0()L 4 ,:�� � _ - ""' 8� '�:�� �_ �� �, --,,� "N,\, , I " -I' ,-" NP -, � 117�) -5611` \ \ IlIx \1 I N I - �-_- ---- � �-_-_,::�- - _�_��_ ____11�� I_ - , � I I _� , I - - � - -:::��--�;-,- --- - ,-_�:,:�� �_­ , �, , _�' i ', I L '11--I, _" , , � ,��, ��5E - ____ / �\ � -;:�,-�- I " ,,�,--- I _.__�________-_ , 77-�,, _', 'Nz , - __ - - , \ � ,,',--'- � D, I/ - ­��, ,\�\ ..1. , \� I '\ / N, 1--­ --_, -1 , ,�� . I � � �,_ �, 5 ,�� -----�5 � -, / ---, t - �7 41 14� �� � � ,\T 'L �__ �1- �-_ 1.-�v�­ - - - -,,, �, � / _"_ I I, Nlk,/� I . I �__ �� �_5'�__�'�: �:_ -` ! _,,�� - - 11 ­­­ � � _-, I I \ __�� _1 -\ � '� � _� � . � � N _1� I � � ,g,� ,�,__,­"_ 7:� � I / ." -.-----) I --I-, � K ,I'- 1/� -:�7�_ � ,- I � �\ �­� I - - --7, _� - `� "', I\ ,-- , -�,-��, -��-��,_ -) ------� <Z�__�:�_­I / I,�-\ k.-, --, , < , I ____, I ,�, - �, , ,� � , I r ,% � � f " (rr--�� " 1�� � , � __"I , � 11 / A4_�� -�, ,-, ,��- - � "' � 'M\R�\,\�:,��_, . fl , \ \ % ,� " , I , ��--��, -­ �,-,-�- �­ ,� " , � ,---� I'/ - =1_______ I ( ( �,�' K ", Z - I I I - - -1 _1� I I , �N_ �' - X\ ,k-: _____ /T ­-,� ­` / I , f I\I,\ I \"��'�\�_ GAI, � i, ___:;� � ___ e �" " " , �', , .�� ,�� , , --- ---- ��,�­� �-�:,�-�->�- -,-,-, \ _____� ,\� " , __� � � - I -I ,,�-- � - �,�;� -, ----" - , Ij � : �,144. �q I\ I I " I I /' I \ _,_�- ,,-,� If--, ---- � \ - -N,NX � , - � , -, /-I- ,�\ 1�1,� _. >�' '�X?T_ `-� I fm__ T , 7 _", � , , ,��,� I I' I % 1\1 ,_�, __ ��', , -��-�­�-�-::�--_-�-,-�� I, _j -��-__-_/__­-'I­�� - Z�_, I i �,5�"/ .�_�11��_1�0�_t­ \ _� ____:_7 ___� � I`* , , . ", I ­1,1,��,- � , , - - � , - - __ � , - I �_� 1\ I �\ ':' \N � , \ \, / / \i I , �\ I " - \-%%\\', \1 \ I \,/ ,/ � - --- , i 1, * �\\ \ / 111� I - --�--, _=::�__�____ , --�'\�-, -- - -i--,�- - I, ,�- "��, --- -- IN � @� � N, , I I ,N� 'I -­z -:�- � _-, kI � I"r) I V \\ _N -, I ___ � -::�_�, _/ \ �' - '� , � , � - ' � , � _� " " ��__�_ - � " \\ I' -� , ) � � Il, �__� I <, -1 \11\��\' " % \ � _/ , \ I ,���, ��_,��,��,-,- �� ll,� , �4 I, 'l F, � I ___I -I I f - \1 _�___ - -, -:��. -, � � � �," ,14-42 - 11 13 _-� � " N\�, - _/,��, ,e�09 � f , �_ ­_ / /;�,, ) , r ._1 \ / -\-, I X,M, -� -I�I --?_�__ \N, � ��_"_/ "11 ---/A I ,"� "I iN , I , ,,\�L�, \ __N� �� ,\ :_ - , '� I I , I \ \ � , , ,, I I ,�N\ \\ 11, <� I I I , " /,� ,�� �,- � � ,,) �t J` ,38 / ,� �­ __� -1 I/ Z:::��_" 1 �\� 'NL , �\ L (' I / (-,u " �,, /111 �/", � R��,t,5,��,�� 11 -, (z, __ , \ \ � - I 6 xy, � I \--�,,, I I I, " __ �� �N,%' ,-- :,���-�,�_ , - - --� " �- ----;,-, - r' � ______1 1�--��.,::� I I I I J` I - N, \ < N , �V'\ - � ,�,�:--Zz __-� _/ I ",""', . `t,\ \ � \ &I � I 1�� t I, I 1, IN K I / , 4, -,:,-�-*, V> __� -.I A 11� , \ I I - � �\� � If >'\- I%T� �,-"�,�, U,- -7,_--,,z��5-- _4 1 __ I l� I, NRR�1, , '�, � , i / - N ` � I � __ I N i � ) \\,\ , , /x - I_I­ _3 Y \ �\ f N, \\, ,�\--_,_ A\! �\��,, � , NO \ I , � � ":;I /�>/ , - , " �1­ 'I 1>�11 ,:1, /T I- -1 I- 1"'/1 ""I, - � :�A � _._,___1 i I I I - , I N� 1�,� ____, I \ , N ,� , � , _:�� __�_ I _� I , -A. 1 �1 ,� ��_ ,_ � r-/----- - /',,� ,_J1 I I,-- I - f�_" ------ " , 11 f- i'�t - - "I '117 , , ) - __ :�� ,�?Z� ) I I ,� - , ) I- \,\ ,��-,- I/ �, _�� -, � -, ��//\� I , ,,�. �___ - " 'k ^ 1_� I _� i / . I I I I \1 \Z,\ � �, 11, , /// " I _____ � " � , � `I1 \ , , \ - �5,7_,��r-�,­ � _D�__ � �1� __ � ­', >� 'W-1�:_N< _­N" I _`­,11� ) � ,/ __ , " NN, ,-,, � ----\ �\� �, ��N�y� , 1�. I �� '� �_ _t:;�,_ , , ,` __ " - >4,_I l" , A � ­ � -7-/-, � --- � I' ,/ _N�,,� � I � \1 �\ I // "I I� ---,:7 � / ( 1, I I � \ I \ � I - \ I � \� -_ I � lz,/�_ - - -I'- - r-' / I I ___�� v , ,z N 4, 7,5 \ , I \ � " N ��_�, �____�_ I 11 I I I � q � -) --,,� , , � , _____1 , - , I \ II, I � , � , , , ,� S - /y/ " , I - _"l- - - �,_�__ �, �', I, // z I I \ , \ � I � / I � N,Il \ ,, 6 ��,_�2 ,,,, � - , I / ___�__c -1-___ I ,,, �, \\ IN, I I - I - I / � , , /III - - .- I (_1 I 11 I , l,_ - - A \ �� \\" \ \ IN-N, �"Is, �\\ N / - //// /, / 4, I, /� T /__ __ I I z . l' f 1_­` , �1 I - \ 1`_ �, - �') � \ I � I � ) �___ ",Y/ ) V `� 1 0 "I - I 1 14,5 f \'' \\� I ,� (' - , j I I, I - - � - , f , N, //Y I - \ \ � 4�� , 0", � , � M/ , // ,�. ,,-` ------, ,I' - - <1 V N) ,_ � ,I , _ I - 11 1'� l' / 11 I �, " " =1 It \ \ \, � , , / � )6 1 Ip- , I I �, -� - -1, \ I / ( f\,Sli�,�( I % \1 - - z - I/ f / ", llvEi'Il - - ��- / `I- *-'---, _� __ "I �, ­ I I - \ � I )), __� � V 01l." 11 \ \ ,,,�w.,�, . __ / '' / ,,, " i,� ��/,. , ---,,, - / i( \ I � � � , ,,� �� I /�,/_, I - , - ,_� __­�`Xl��_z�.,��- i �\l y IN __1 ­-, I I I \ (�RE-4N, I _� I " I'll, / if ;- � �� - IN " NIN ­--�___­ �,,�__ � � I ... �, 142�6o I Ij / �,I _�,,� 1;�� � "\\ , '� I -- I , /X, ,�_­�--�'��, � If ) ( \1 \ � I" N1\ ) ,�pl , I N, - - . _)__ , I, \ 5�wx ,/ 11 ,,, �� _L&W i � / � \ , \ NiI,'_/ � ) , I ,g�z 'bl I // `�, �-,�-`N,N '�,_' I /� __­N N, I ,g� � ��,vn' " I Y, - \1 I �,N,�� x14( , -.,,I I , � _).,v3_.�,,< '­�_---` / / .� " ,��t - . , I, t_�Z�� K /' ) ( - �\ ) / I 'I'" o, , �,/ I I y / 0- _11'_J / 036�8�) / ,/ \ ,�-_, , ��­ ,--.-;.--- - \ J,�5,5 146,9C) I " - IN I , " i 'I\ j . ,�, ,� s )� - -1 �,, / , , / " x TIIIJ�M _I/ / , " , 1/0, � � �\ " /. / / N-I, "' L ) 9 �/ \ � �, / I, , ,/ / J, I) \, � -11 - " "/ - I// V///// / / ,,-- , I � - \ I I - / f ) �,, 8 I` � / 4�, , , f / I // , .1 , / ) _`�--__Z' I"_-, " ,lcl_�,j �� � I I , � / I ///// I 11 //z�//"§', � ,_ I- - / r I ",-/ I �� � � �/_/ / ­ � \ I / ��,', " Y, �� � I—, �I V1 40,5� V N I -I" I-- �1. ,` // �1_11 �,_ I- � � - 11) ) , , 1_,,�'- �I- _�-, / " , I/ .1 -1 � I / ,­�"'_ I / / , 74(), I 0 V140,53 " I ­ 11_�' - ",­-, \ " 1­11,57 1 \\\ , � ,'� `� � - , / r v I I �Z, , ., I � I 1 47. (�x - , "-',�� __11 ___ 1� 11 i .' / Q1�4 1\1 () � I - I __ P, , I— � , �-, � /I ( , / . , ,---�- I 11 _ \\ ) 'N' �­, / _�­ Z 1_/' / 1,//,� / I � ., '/, f I ', 1), I `­1 NN I I I I N, , I I Q /-- 11 I' /;o/','f //X//1 .'5,� ,�/ I y � �\ N N� "') \\\ , '-,-. __,_ � \'\I � / " I-,, 1�, 7 , ,138, (�) 7 I'( X-14-1 73 1 I _�5 "----0 1_1�_ "I' ,--,-, � �',,�� , I I I � I - � I" - I ­� ,,, \ _/ / . I \ ) I " I "I'll' , , _Z�_�_,, /� " v// / , Z \ \ �N��,_��, " - � M / i / I � , I I ) 'I 5��__ \,, � / / ,,` ,\\\ \ I `,, \ -, 11, 1�� I i "FIEF , , ", I, , ",��'�, , � � , ,�� - ............. \X1 \ v ) � ---,,, �I'j -\ I\ IN, / II I, A )A� . j . ,z-, �1, ,� ',,�� ,_� / I I / � \ � . N \ _,,� " .4� � / /" , ,�,,,��N � I 1��, I � N `­ - � /� 11 ,�� , M?'////,� - r I / 724.9�5 / � , I I N� I ,, // Vl4­),0,q , , � ( , " ,4 - %�� �� W, \� '7,,- , -Z,*,,,�� 1/f , N, ,� , " �iS�- X , I' 7 7 -_--,­,,, , �,3�,�< I, / I' y ), 11 , - __� , /;�/, I 111? , ­ // " 11 / t / I , I " N, \" . ,,,, r k� , �,_/ , ,�/ � � X; --- _ '\\",\ \ 1 �'O.\,�7 \ \ � '1� �'// X - � I � , N, \v\\ � \ /, , , , , " " , \ r,\,\,j ,� , /, 7,-,�" , �, )� / / -- I / ­_111 ( � �" , -,-,�;�/,/ , 'j , Y11 � \ Ni. 0 NN'I- � 27 / ,\MW �\\\ \ -1, \ , I "I j m / � I, _/ j I ,� 1�`,N, I " ,4, " , /1� ,� KU \_� �)Yi`/' � X, - '_,� I " ) � T',�q 12 1 1 _7�;�_,�', 1 , I _�-, �� " �� " - I I ) "I I / � - I 1XI N�Z,,,:��,1�111 -7- /, I I i ,I,/ /I � �--� I' " - I I , \ � I - -�-�-<�,��­z< 11,11 1_',�,��r '1� 1'�/ / A . - - � \� \��__� I � 1�' -, ( ANN 1'11�\\ \\X I I- - 1_��_� � -1 I , -I ,li " � I � �_ , -, -- � I- ,�,_ 1. / 1, / '-;- '--- , - " I ,� -1 � - - ,� ��, ­-�� -�",,, , ��, z Is, ��,_-- I - I , I �I I, -,��\ INA 7 2 1, 1 , K, "I-,, I I I 040, i I 1__�_ - -, " �,,` -I,p-/ �,/ � '? .1, 1, l�-, 0 i \ N- \, `I- l , _'?, /,////� - -�;I,- �� '��4',,�,�' � I \ I ! ( I`Z­11�__,_��,� 11 - � 'IV - I ,I'/ Y�.�" I i ',I, I " -\ I - - _,�_ � � ------ � 'K / 7./ , '&,V� 1� I �� I - - --�,_� � I ll I , "' I " , , , �I y I I / Z�/ I � 1 �Vwl I/ I I I ­, � - , , ,),4 ,� � , , , , , \ . /, ,Ir N �, &� , \ I � I; " / "I , , f � __'\ V �, '�\ , ,I 111i� ,�_� , � , ,_ I \W1 ,_ " I I - � �, I "',/,",-�/ " / I \\, " "I ) \ i 1 -vi y'" I `� N \ 11 I, I I lly � 11 ,� N,N, I - __ � --- _­�, '&*r__ ��� �� I� _ f i \1 ', I 11' I i _� ,,� � -11 // \,i� _.� - I � \ � -,_, II tj� I \ i I N,Z� I�L�\<� ---I'-- -­ �-qx*g��---�__­ - - , � � w � � , " I) ", -- �� - -_ ----"- ­- ---7::---- �z I F_� I I - \ \�: I W�:�,'-,�,,,��,� r" I // I/ I - I I ,�, - ",--__� -,', --,�,, "I I/ ,_ ,," , �_ - _­�--� , r�l' ----, � I I\ � - ,,- "�,, " I "IN "'N'NN"I'�, , _%� ­ j ­ ___E_i�___1�7��__:�, ��i I I, 11 -:k I ��, , \, I, - ,_ "1 _:�,- �,,,- - \N - - - -I,, 4-- _,5�, , k , , NNN � I :�� / �_ �, I = - '/ / "AlW�/ 'li, I �-­ ,\" N, ,,`� , II, A , -I _-�ll --::z ,_ - ,2�p = , I, , I __ �_\3 0�1 � \ V; N, `4 ,\" `� , , _�- ��z _ /,/,//,/"/ � V ,\k , ,N,N, �� _�, -----_::7---�L�___ I It i 1 0 1�7__:� _�, , \ 'b \��,NN,\\ ,; I 11,\Z�,\-,�,�\�­�,, --�,, , �� - ,__,` ,/ / �/?� io�,�/ " , , ,V,//,� " , \ I VIM\. W\ W\\�\0X\\X\A--\ ,� X I` �1_1�1., N, ,� "--,, ,­Z�Z-`,- \ , �) -),I I I 11 \ / � (,��i I I'," , �\,'��, , - - �����5_�5 �-g �-�� �-%f, WI1?;,L1,),1)1/� - I,---\ -I�P4 h� 1-1 _,_� � M � N, 13 , I \ `� I , 35 ��, 4 3)9 5 xl� " , _ - - - - I _,_�_ . 1� - - " M/1 I ---\ ---� 1�/ "' " , � ,,:7�,-��I�<�11 , � I t - � / IN ��\,�, : � `\' 'N, , ��Z,.I 1, I 041 , 'No � �, \,�� I , \\\N " 1 , /',� i " \\ � i � �` �PE \" i --I- - / V� - , \ \ \ _', �,I __4/ \� � ,--,,- F,/ "/ ( - f I \�\ I\N�,�\,'X\w\ \1 \1 '� Z, ,,, ," , " , �, � \ -��, - - _�,- � _'� " _�.,-., _� - � , r , � IN, ,,\' 'y N �W I ", Nl`� __ -1, - I 1, _� I 1, ,, - -1 - �,�' � -x -, I - -NIN, -Z� -�- - 01'��\ NN\x'\�\�,,,�,�� � , , , ,,,,\ _�, � I \r,�, \�,,,% \ ��, / ,,--- � I )N N, \N "I N�11 ­_ z P� ( � , S _> I, �% , ,:::�� �/ f �11�� ­� ­N�� , , "' ��",��_11�"� I , � \ %� " " "I ", \�,\ �" \ � \ / " " " " __� I �< - ,�� 11-1 --- , " xl/��11� ,---_�,,,�,, - \,- , � � N\,_� I, I 11 -, � �) // \ ,�_ � � k ) �� \\,\ 'M <\ I , \\ 0 I , a .'� ; CPECpq \ K \, _j , R , \ I " ,\ �,_ \\ �,, � I � / 11 !�/," _':��Il 2 IN , , I , \ \, 4, x ----- 11��,_ \ �, \ N, ,N_ j '11, ""I" I L/�i�E :,�, / I Mz , " it 4,� \ '\ "', \,'� -�% , ­:��:� f , , _1� b - 1, "'�� I I MIN\\ \\\�K\%,)&`�� , - --­-� N, ­-,, "�, \ I " 9TH \ i \ I �il \ 'i I�-- -­�---�,,�­'-N ,?\�, I,\ 0�411_ I �. //,/ ,, I , ..1-1- "I , \��_L <, � � "NI' 1 (/,"___7:�,_Z,�Q� _,�_,, I \' \ 1, / /­ I q �4t , , "',, 11 / ) �, ,� \ \�,yy ,,� , , � 'I__N, ---,/ ///A/Y/M////11 \\ ,�,�,��",,-�,�,�-­N, " - , �1 �_ ,,:� ,� \ / "I / 'i � ,-,, I ,&/" \ � .� N, \N\\ " 0 �\-,� // - ""I �,I` I , /,/ I �W�-, / - -�­��,,��,Z� "I -liVe � / I -�,.,_ -I I - I�f " I �\M�' 'I, I \ �, , ,Z' ,�� (' i i ;i __ 1,`_ / V I \, \�� � � I, � // �( f/ ;i-.-:� \,`,�'�l 56i� 11 - ) � I N`­N, I 1-1 ,/j / ,I \ 'V�'lN, / _�� � � , \,\\",\\" "I'll , // / I , �/f I I _�II,��,____,-, \� , ��_',Ql ll,p�141111 � i I ", N III 142 � (( - \ ,� "_ g\\ ,� / ( � / � -,;, \ - " x � r(_ ( ]I 2 , \ "'Il ,I ,I ,I I / - ,� "I 'I', I '� " _J I :�:,� \\��\ �� y NN \,\ 4�1 \ I : // \ ,�, g \ ,\ �� I. I, � � - / ,� 1'N\\ , �,,,S, � I I )-'I _1� 11 -5 �,,,, 11 I \ o \ l � , � �N ,\ � I �, I, ,, \,�N, � A , ,\ N& 1�_�, 1\1\ � I \\ ', \ " j I ��, � ,\ 1� ,�_. �)$j , � I �, , -11 \ 11 I �� \ , , � m _� I; //1 11 .1,3-/�(-�o " \,\� N,\� I \%�\\N',\ \� \,�\M\, , _� II, __ . !1�,� , " I , � 1� � I 1 1 \ N ", _ - � of /, ,\'NN __7 / I '. /,/,/, ZI�/,/ 41 " , i � - I\--- ______� " ,li �/ �� \�\M�O\N\ j \ �\� IN , - ,-� __j - , -, I-, - -- ,��_ ,__ 11,�>`, 5,511 / / J ) 1 / ;I � ­ , � . / 1�� - ­____.__ � ,l, I . __��,,- /l ,/,,',' I /1 I 1 � j i j �'" I - - - 1�9� � , � % , ��,,� I I � \\\ , , , \� � -- __ - ___ - ==_:�--��- , �_� �---� I , ,-- � V� 1, , , 'uw,\ , 1, `�< " �_._,_. -_ , , I , 4�t, - 7 =::;z -�� ,� - " \ �I i A -I ��,�� �r I . ,I, 1, - � ��/IF j 1 �­ ,i_ � , _. � I , - - - I I ,I- -- � I ,�::=�:---:�:-< --, -, i \ , `�, ­-f; 3:�­_,CzFmi - - � I � &.III I \ I �\\ '\ N __,­­' _ 11 ... Z� 1 �,5-y,-.____- � I 11 I ____ --- � I� � � _'4:,--5--> �1_ ,�--,,5�, ;X / 1 I I , , I � �, .,N:, �; I '. , I , -Z:Z­� <�� - , \ - - 1____� , I,' I _� �-� __=.�-�_ - Z-)," , - � Z�- - - I 1�� , �,__ .:= ==- - -, , , \ -�� --��,c _--N,'N �,N \ ,,, ,1 - - - � __� 111�_,:�� / � \\ � � , I " , ), - _____ / li I -- '_1 _­�� . - -'IN,-, - Z:�� � I � _�.��,L_,_� ' -_­ ""`W" _��,�__,:�( 1�11� I � - � � _�T ) \ \_�, `N "N, - 7`I�,�­_��, \ _ ��, �, �\�� �\M\� ---_­��, I ---___, ­_- ) I ___1 ------ �:=n___��___ -------,--- ___:::_�__77:__�,� r?,! i illi I \ __� _I­1_��__�� ,�OM�_,, I . , NN "',__,_,�', ,I \ \ __ ----_ �� ___ , _, I X, \ I \ _��_--_,�� ��ORMMM�,/M, ��\ , -�, \ . ��l \ __ _,r" - l..i.I)-- , , --- X� ­_ -le `­ I 11_� I L�� ?i _-,-'---- �­__-___ 'o I 1_�_ IM "% \\ � -- ____7________ N - .,,�, \ \ \ - - .-� ) - 3 , N � "�, �jj ­�_��_�r,-.�_�� -- , V I - "N' ) ��,��-��,,_�,o - I \ I IN, - � -,---- - , I _� � I I I I, __ ', �,,'�-,�­ I ­� -� - - _ __:_,��­­ . 'A 1_�' � �., - - - , ��, _�_,�� � - I? -I � I t� ___ __ IN I ( �/ " ,_ I � e�___:�___��7_=_:�Zp__Z, ::==:_-:' __ -_­ - - M _1\ _- _:��- I -1 I, v " �', \" "\,V,\ \ ` _1I \ ,� , __­_ i - � , _*- -I', - 71 :�'�- ---::� , � � , I k -Z� :::�-�,-�, ,,,j� \ � � I I ,--' ,4 , � ��, ____ 11\11 ,�\ , " _� \A,\\�- - �-� I�'L A / / / il r -�, ,,_%, -, \ ). 9, �,/ " I -.-_ <�� // - _:-, -, I \ i � f \ I /,,-r-I - � !\\ \ I, N,\ :71z��,� -1,::�ZZ:.- �,, ,:�- ___,_ ­ \\\, \ �, �, �,_­� IN, - / / - - - -, `�`�---- -:7_--_E�:z:z== ,5, I­,_� _� , $�� �zx �1'1 I\ 'v n ) N �� , " //,/ \gg,, \ __ --z� -;�,� __� , "'�_ _�_ _-, . ci� e\,� 6 , ,0 \ \) "N� �\ k ,;� \ v\1 -N '�� - - ::!� ,� 1� it \ _L=: Util�.4f,�1,� ,, R , \ ��, I, -� <�_�--::::_--: : ,\' , , , , \1 ,� , ,_ 'r \ L __� I "",\,�,X*, III 'IN \ fA �, / / '� `-\\,� /!,I ` I A�r( ,:-< �/ / / / ,/(// I \ I I-`\ \ \\ N �\ \ \' � IN N�\ � I � , �,� - .:\\�� \ �,\� ,�\�\�g,�\, r \r -) � 9 � "N _� 1 ,��7�_�§�, x ',%Il� \,�'�\�,, ,\ IN � -�g\,\\\\",�\\�\\ 0 , [ � , \ � ///[ / I8'0� ) 0 38,61 � � __.",/ ,­` ma / \ , � � � 1, � �\ �� , I ,�5��,,m " \ \ \ -11 I ,,,,,, V� - It N, ,g , , IN I "Is , , \ N','�'�, ,,,,, 1� �:' G,EEN , \ , M \ Nf \�� . N ,\\M\\�111'� , ,��M\ I ��', - , - N� 11 � � I ____,� , , � ,_,) ji - I . J37_5 I, I �� AN, � I , , 1� 'I � 11 ?, k � _:��_ - � \ \\ , , � \ 0� Al ) I \ 'o, �__� �­ )1___k I � ) \\ I 1 3L��,� I � " - � �\ 11\\\\\\� � N " ') IN I -, -.-- - - - � . - \ ._;�,,�� to � I � I \ \ ____� --- ,�,, � � � I A __4,� 1 /1' ��-!'� �,��,,�,- ,-" - I ,_­ - - - __ � " , _-:�r -,��,;_� - --- -_ R� , I I ,,��,)� .__�,� , - _�1�111,�, - I \ ____k\1 � I i � I I : - I __ ­ - -,:::- ��_ - - ­ `� � % \ \�,�� - -, __ c I- �� \1 I\ � \\N MkAIVI�\ \:\\IN 1�\' N , I\M - r -Z"i�, z_:s , I ) , I I I��� \ �IZ__, 1� I 1, I _,_­ � , ��, � 'g, ­-, � O'k, N \ \ k\ 131 ,xI 1111 \ ,\ \ I \�,(­`�111 - ri -1 f Y,��3)3-�5��)c " Tz�_ � " I k NN ,,� 1\ '\'&\\� x �� I I L" ��, , � 1__� � _N_4� - __ i � \1 � � � ',)6,'7,i--�'v,'���-;��,������-- -� �111._�_�_��_� . . . . . - - , ,�c � Aff, . r � I - , W, I , � _1 " ,--- ,.C-- I y \\ � I V., \ ,`�_ "I I I � .1 _� " \ � ,�,;��,, ��,-�', , , ,,, . _­ -,N'_ _::::��--­, " , , - T­ I - 1-` I - �_ -_ - I ,�� \" I� �10�_ ", 1, -1, 'I'l/ I \" -, �� ,141�, \­C�,­,�N -,<, 11 .�� � i I _� - ,-- �,�,, N&',�, '. -,�,,,, � , _', ) �\ �­,\ �"Icj, LA \I- 11�� ��\X�ffl\�\�` �\A��r_,_� :�Xl � , , :­­ "�� \ 1�11 _, , - 'N� Z,F,131­1��r \ A ---"-- T ,11,N � /` 11 - - " � ­� � -, ",` .., ­�N' \ 1�� )� 15 li.� - _��,��,� � � ,_ I ----__, � I \ , % ,� �, " 111�3i, 4. \ N � 1__,�"` � \ , , :-\) I",' I N'_ ,��_ J/ I ,,,��­ , , , , � I ,I'- � , - ;� ,,�, / \ , I I ,'\ ,k'-'�,<�, -- - , � , �, . ,�, ��'�Z`Z,"Yll ,__ ___� �� _-� " " , -_ VNJ\�\ , q '14C \ - N , - "N I ",�,� I, ,-��:Z�":,C­, ­­<-,,�-�,Nz� R L " 1 , \ _ 'N N \ " " \ I I � \\\\\ , � ,� �, : \� �_ '2�� \ \IN, \6 \ )�"_\ "Ni, v \ ,\ x ,`_� >i I,- -1��,N,�� ­N -N, , .1 �,I, �,,`030 I-, � I, N, \ \1 I " .,­ / , :- � � _,�� " N. � �_ - -� - N xl,,�X, ", \ IN \ N`� � \ � F / �,��7��:��=-- ­ � 7--v-,Izz:::�_ ,--.-I-- .. ,,, I I - --- � _Z�'�___'__-,�� , -_ ___, , N, , 'L � ,-- ,_ , \. sm � \ ,e ,y� \ \ " 1�1` I ,�,.K�Z�� - ,12zj,,7�.,-��-,--:�,_-�7,�-!�--��, �:;, ��, �� \��\\,N` \�, , \ � � ____,------ ,\ \.,` ,\� N \ \N 11-` - � � _�*,�, � ,� NN INI� I I � I - Xi�� �� \,�-' .1, _*'z "" "11��q�_ - -, - -, - - ::-��::7zz�_ ��31 _�� POND 1�111 '11:,�\ I , N, � If , I I ,�,,, \ 1�, IMN V, I "I", Q '? - : z ,- �� -- -,� I - _ _Z�_ -, r_;_ 'I - . / \ --I - \Ni- / ( , ... �\ N, \\\ ,�\ IIN ,,, i /I -I, �,N,�­,I­.)­' -- --­�.­ --, � ,: - I , '�,, ,\ ,, 11� - "I, \1 _�- , � ,,, � IST - I --I-,- � - _ __ -, - I . - , VVA '126�(.)�4 1 ',�Ipz ".1 ��,,� �� 11131 1,34 ��Z � _w�":_:�i ��§_ �_�__ / _ ,'\ \ � cN, ,,-��'.'�-��,� � "--- 1__1" \ Sl�l ,� "� - - , "" �51 � , - ,� � s /P- \ - \ 1\ ,I, I I zs,�-'_-"��--, . ,� 0,13. \\, , �\\ _IAIJ7,;� - �, �s�,� , - , , _:��_:� " ,_ - ��-, �_,_ � , ) `,2- NO � -7- \ ,�,,, .. - �1_ 11 1� ',- __Qz�;;��-Z�---��,'��� _ - - � _ I . I� \ - , - , \ � ,,,, " "I, �L� k �) -1, , ,�� I - I - , _ - - -_ - � � "i4i'�%� I`;;` 11 II � --- , \ -,,�" - I ­- 11___�­ - ., _f", " � -::�; 1; , , I I Al � ­1 --­Z�,_, -, - , - ' , ) :,�,�� \\\ n\ �`, , - I , � - I I— - '1"N<­, I -1, --�--- 133- ---" I \ _�� - Syao'��,��4' I � , 'te\ o 4 c) .;�) 7 ,�-,��,� �-<f" N, 11 `N,,-� `-, 7 ____ ,_:,-I ,,- , "'�z 1\� N" \ \ v � - , , � ­ � ___�, � W \\\\\\N� � I � _,�,� � / I I \'� , ,�11\ _5;, " � , / _ \� ��\ ,\N1 � I'll . ­1. I ,>i, ,� � , "I 11 ', �:"�� � I-- ,'," I—— ----- .�, )//I a - " " / � � , '. N,N , I I, '\ 1 ,1,33,2 : N, � ----' - _JJU_j� " _ �� - �111o�� ,�_ 11 I-N �-' /I , I ,,, 11 �\\\\ 011� ,� 'N" "��., I I I 11 " ­ ... - , �, ,�� - � 7�---) \ _,", , \ 01,7O 1 ,��r�, ( k ,� I .-- , " /�, ,�-�,,:� ,-���,-��5-; 1 - -_­--`�-�-­- ,� , �1 � I ,_;�-,;q�%�, -- �,,� 11 ��' - ',,-,�I ..... - , \ ,7 1 " I I , I PUTTJN�� "".. - ­ - - -1 I - - _ �: l, -/,Z:" zzz�_,_ ,:�,- ��__Z -"-i� ---.- , I I 'I� � . \1 IN , �� I . - ! , �-- - '-=ii,F,Q�:':�.. tart�----Q�L�-��-- --- ­-­_,:�,�>,- 1%, , 1, ,5�1,��, 1,�� -�, w;��," ­_.__, ""--, .:, - � - ""Ill - x;�(11� ­��,�,��,5?�,-,�, -;-�� I N1\1NN\\ - \\N I " 1­1 I'll , " : " -,-I ,­`-, __� ,,W,E------, mr, _� ----- - � ,- , ��' �,- � , �\,\��\N, I I I', ,�\, 1�_­ - " , --,:, � I 3 a, . _:� :�:� � I �� � ,_ I'll ,,�,7\ V1,41", �� ,/ ��:=,_, " �(� I ,-�5�_ - / ), ,< I I , ,I ,, I 3,�. �.),3 ',\,��, - - ,� ifo��_ / I V \N NIN \ 1 7 \\ �, \ � "�_'L�,� . , � ___..____ Il \ __� .�:�,�', ', , I , 1, x ,,�, \ N, I, " " ,,, IN, 1� � 1,1� � �A�� .. �\� K ,� ,� , 6 ,,��,`,�/ N, (11 " - , � �, GREEN " ,-, - '4 ::5 - - -- , I _� - � � 1!�,, �A\ , " \ x"'N`?�, I \ �\g\', \IN\ "X'\�,Nl, � , � � �, -__� - � , \N \ ,� 1­ - ", " " `NN I ­- - - -1, ,­_ �t_Z�5 _____ - - .- S, _�', -�- � ­­,_ --\ I, - I - -,----k ­, : , �114.1 ,-- % IV ,_ I I,- � � � � ,,�.- , 6 �y I N ,�' \ I ,� / _� " - -I- �1::��h�?�,�x ,.:�:� - -/" /, �� �__��,��,��,I", , , I' . , -_ I ,,�' "7>_�, -�� � -, I` I", , -, , , , __ � I __11 I -1 , t � Tc-,� ---/ , , " \ N��' - ),1 - __rl� I �_- �' " , / ", � - - \'N 1\ I � - I - , /,,Il,-- VI 37-Z, - �,lx , � _�,­ - --- - -, ___�_� -- ­��T --:� ��, '11"2 �-��-,­ I "NX\\ \� \1 � , '111\��\\�11\1�\1�1� N �,,, , , , _�, -1 'N If � __1 > s �- " 11 -:�77-­, \_ - I"U'�',_`,�`, \\M\\ I �\ I \\\\ V, ,\ ,� ) J, .____ -I" I 1, _."��� , V 5 V,7 40_�7 )11 ,\\ " � \"",\ N�,�\\��,�N�\�v\" I - \ \ �, �, , ) IN,, IN,,, zx'., I/ I " lls�i,__��,� / �\ , I \N� , I/ '2 ,> 4 ��\ 7\ I\ � , \ NIN , ,� I I X , , \\% \\\ --rI,-- .1 \, , I -I , , I "',M\ �, IN \,` \ , ,�N, ,�, 'r.- ­ ­ ------ __ - _<Il - - --- K_ ,,�,N'��. � ,� " ____ - -::::�­� \ 0 �,J�-'�� --- -- �,,�,;,��;�- -,�.,-,�, I ,-I,r , - __ "--­-�7-, I'll. ­ x 1 Jb­�9 -,J22��, I_ �_Z=_-=_ �� , � �, � ---- -?-" -le-, -- __ `\ '� ��;� -- 0 -",-- '3 __11 -­,/ - � �� �_ 1��,,' ��,-E,Z___--_ �- \ � ��\ I �-� �,;;;" -� ,-�­ ) ( ))\ --- / I ,- / ;�,____:�_ `� -171 -, ­­-1-1177--� ­_ ,�'/ 11 4-��­�,,� �� I - I ,� " I �� � - . \ ��; - i I,\ � _Tf �,k��,' 7", ��__ \ -�',� -� ., I., , _� ,�,', N \N, - I " �� :f/ � ,� -I�� I .,6. �� / - .t ,,� , - M\,X1\1,X"I1), �\\ ,\� .1 � I _I__ i�]_- I - I�__ -,I-",/ � J ,��, __ _�_,­--l' 0_,�_ / . I, - - ��,X,��,>wvf ,��,�f;,�_ ,_� "' , , I "� ,,, , `�`\`m\, �4 , ", 'r , -, \ T I "_­ ��Z, ,�, / I,<� ,' � \ ,\� ,�� , � \\ , �, , , A \� \ � � I �� , , a \ - , , , . - I,, �k�"A " , , \�� �\ ,\k �� , \, " � -_ �1\ \ \�, 11:1��N\111 \ . , ��,� ---,��/�/�,,\\\ 1, I ",` �' f � -_ -- -_ -_ _� __ _::-� ,--" - ­­(1 - , " , \ I \,�'\ % 1\11 I _­ I,,r I -N __j I k� _F - -­ -- __5­� __�� N - I I I _,_�,- 7 4 10, / 9,52 ;x ­­ " � �� -- I .��., ­>X�-, � - _Z_�__� __ ,7. �.- ­ \ IN, \ , \ \ \ , 1,�,� - -I �' (� e r' , 38�",�3 -z�z-,e' ­ , - __ I J\ I, , �,­-,\,N.", � ( ,�f` - ._i��1`11 ---,Z�, -x 0 \ �, ��, /, �//, I- 11 I I Z� /x ,.,. , �\ � � ,,,,� 10�j 'I- I , ,,, \ IN \\ \ xx) �', , �11 , '. \ ,----, ��,� � U11, " � �,,l/� ,li 1,56 (9, Ill, 1--v - --,,�-,-- ,\ ,/-- / � ,f I , 1�lf \ �`_X \�\ ,,,,4 1 ,,,, '� - 7�_,,, 1,',�,�-­ - � I, III- - _,-��_� " __ II137 0 ,�, __-_ . - -\-\ ­-'s,�,­_ ­_ I- I I, -�, , / � - 1� ,, \� � ",, , __� I _,�:� /,z I, , ,\,�`, , I , ,I I is� C� I\ "_ , -1 __1 �, " /�//�, �/ ,� � � \ q I . ,�I`l / / / I \\ � \\ �\�\, �Nn� , ci4 ,13 �l 2 ,7�-�; 1 1 r _�::�­�, 2���_l \ �_ \ x � - , � � I\ 11 �LL - k - ,�/ ,\ ,\ ,� '\' I '�' ,� _�,` - , -�\ N IN, I I I ,_ - � _ _7 - , I IT � v M-Z �,-. I I, " �, /( , ,- ­ ( I 1�, - '-1364,, 1 1 / / � - �\��\\ 1% ! � , I _�­, -- -- -% -- li - "I �,7/./`, I \ a I ,x 1, - _� -, R ,., x - \ , ,�l \ 0 ��� � v -­ ­---­� N -, \ �� \\,I I I \ 11� � ( Y� V ___ , GREEN , I , m \\\,,g\\\ I '� � -_ - ,� I i�__j A-------- ( � � �� 11 � � �-�-�-,--�:�-=�_�_,, \ �X/ , Kdxpl r'- , , , � I :��I,k I'll, " � IL � -- __ _,� , f! .,-, 11 1_­j P��16_ \ � '\, � ­ \\M\ ,\:\ �\\%"�\'\'N �__ _�___ gIN " \�\_1111 -f \ ______� , \ I I l _/ / A , R ;, ,�' 01 I - , " � �� I - - X�,'� " t/_ - K_x� ,:�, " �_ � ,� \ I M, , � I � -, " � ��, I-, �, k b � �\ \ 'M , " ', \ " e, -, ,� k, �,& A �N 0-1 ,,__��-�_ -,---, I 1/1 11��1111 , I, , , , I �_ ILI N I 13 � / -, _,;� , , _�_ \ \ , , , \ , �, ,�� \\ � " \ \ 10m / I , _/ / ,�f , k � -�, -�,'--�N_ /,' / \ - f -, I-) ))) � _/-� ,)- N�_� )\I I i 11 � \:�J� ,,� \\\ , � � - �< I �__ " -Y - , N� �,�/,// �/' I vw M/ 1, II "N I I. I � ��___:��_ . ( / � -, - -11 0�, I 1, Io,� N,,� , . �� ,74 , -�, L - �:�_ -j , ___ - , ­'___Zz_ \ ,14!,s,9 \ I / / , /� 1�� \ ,,� )\ \ -, ; i ( R,� " . 1( t, � - � / ,_,,� t I, 0�1 0 I l Lk N \eI,:��Q,"\V - I �_ I �'\ �\\M\N\YM�N` � , * I 11 - \�,W\ _ � \\',\\�I, , __�- - 1 .,:i� "A ! -i, �' !,I' , I ,� I, � - _ f" " I m ,,, \" - " \�,\ � ,� , , \ ,1zq .1 W, Zz ,eI I , \ \\\ .� - _-, I- I , . z� � , I \, \'�\ �­" ,8 �..1111'11,� 11 "/ I 0�fl,l,;�, � , ---I ,� , �� , , T\'\ � \_ ,5 2 � - I I I ,�� r - IN, I �,�� , Rl`x I, , 8, , � I X \k W NM 1`_ I I I_, I _ ,� I - I I , ii � '' �",\I� k -- - - -/ -, 1, !I , -�, � _� / / Il I/ , , (�) \ �\N,�,\,' \\\�� N, \ \ M. I \ I I I ­ -�' - I � ,�, I I I I � I, . 1 , lvl�l ) ___ I ,I- 1, , m /I ­ ,.\ � \\ \ k� I �\�\Nxl\\��\",� ��\% I � ,I I � __ � . 2 � _`1 f� ) A ,_�-; " , - 3, q', 72 �, I�,­�� - ) I- �_ 1`_1 I /// /'/ � '/� � I "' bw/j,' I al II\\ � �� 1 4. III � , ��-_, "I'll", I Ir I , ,�\ I ,\� � , � " I � -;, '17 I I I , -N��-J,t , � ,� !p, I "I IN, , , (I, I -) i I � t i -Ili __��451 I V l L �' V I, 4-,,-� r5-r // 1'�//, x 1�1 , ,�;, 1 11 N, 1M1/1"///9 � 1 7" I�N ,\ , \ , � -i��/'J­q I �__, li­� N, � � , , I , , I/ ,,, / /;�, I V , , D�\ \",\W'!1'WP �`, ,� I I - -� �/,),:�S,o-,, ,--' -`!_2�,_,� �,_ -,-, -, - , 1, , Ir I,/ I . I I I ,_ - __�,_-�-:_ -, , � -�X�,/ X -\ )i 1 1 1 t if ;, hz,�� 4� I Ili `// I 11' � , " -1, , I I ,I � '� I � I � I '� , � I � � 01 � ,I I . . '71,, ,� -, - __,� , _�� N - �, /,,,,, f, H,1,,�,, �ffll 1 --- I -1, ­ I - __ , -- , 1'// y I _,­�,I­' ,_,__� -_�Z� '��//� I\ ,f olillf, 8/,X','/fl1ZV \ �il I I t I - ,_ -_ ----,- ­, � 1­7 I/ I - I , ­/ \ " "R Rz,,, ` jil­ l )) I I i W- �l I I ,.' � _;�__­ � lfl�� I _ - ____­_1 ,,, � __ ­7z�,---� ---,-I\ I , V,�!, , , � / I - , _k, / - -k �_ I, �, x __3 ,-, t i , � - ­�','� I "T � � 'A (I'll illflflH�fl 7,j ljfljlllfl,�,!jll "7 \ I', � 111) I � I ) � � 1) I , 1 'IIII)II I I I 1, I, "I I I , � \ , ) /I I - ,­�� (k X�� lj'�!\\ 1�,I �,,,j , CART BARN , /� � �/ M , / " , , - /� �Il 1, I,�k I I � "I � Y�- �� k I t­X , , �� 11 ��,�,,,�,I 1 , V� I I OOL 'I � -,---� , ,1 I ', i , � I­��,�A � i�, � I�i I � � I I P I \� _,I- . ___��\ \ , I 4 48/ " N'll"I"'i I i, I 1� III ` �, - 1 I � 1_=� ,� ,,_1 I N," I ,_ � �� t \ I , " " � \ �))Mj , "', ��l L,_� , , 11]NI11111Y j 1�,111"j \ L / . : /­_ _', , " ,� � IN IIi 1 1 I � I I � k�- ;l� ----,�­ '415� ��_�� N , *, , I`7 i ,I 4.�_ _f _'< �X-, �,� , "; � 1; I 1,1j I � \ - , , ,,� �,U\\ �-- � � , /I /"11#1// I I 1) I � W li� / JY \ 8,3 - - __/ ­ - \--i � \ , _� � / ,-,I / �v, -;, �__ - -, - _,:�� �<:� N, � � 1, I 1 1 1111l, Ut /. I 11 I I, 1,I11 r- � � RKING b TRuc TuRE, I � 5 � , ,X�,_ I � V,�'11 t " � \, I jig,1111fl� W M.-.1 a .. )qj�ll 1p / I / ///, I�/ � , 15, � , �( r� , '(,--A- ,_ __� ��-'-----`l-z,��'-­� \ ,,, " I '� I I I 1 iil�, 1, 1 11 i I N� u, __�_ I,� - i __ - \ I �jl nolill , I I I , � / /I / // / _/ � � � W \1 , \� , , _­__­ t- I ,/ l � I. 4---7p� , _x �, , ­�-� \ ,\N, - w � 4 � 11, \1 i ,Ill l J�� � ) � I I . 1, \ � \ - I�'g,�', , v� - � � \ � I � I I! I /I, I , " . 'r '75(,�,�q , �', ", \ I ,��_ I - � ,�-,`. .1 I % \ 11C I "'t, I, I, I �,i� � �Nfll I ij­ lijj� 11 I �j 11111 IH I M U, I ��i Y/Y liv / ,�N I -_ I � ,I \ �� I __\ �, \ i I f ­ i � � � ( 1 , ) � 11 . I I I I I, \ - I poaL � _�,_F" I ,I - , , lN I I 0 / � , -,-,,-,, __� - -I I ) ,�� f Iii! / / /K - �_- . \ ;N \ � � � I - I /0 / ­ - -_ � --- - __________1 I t - � 11141i I I'-,' \ -',\ I I I . ­ �� i I , /, �, I - __�_ - ­ I � , - '-,� - '\� � I il��ill�! 1111111 I If � , I ,___ - �r� \\ N,\" � A G - �* 11-1-7 , � 0 ,� i LUDHOU5E ,_"�',_ i -,I . � I � �7/�/" - -, ,��, I ��,�,�� ,� M, 11-1, ,--IF L - - -- ---ft-��: , . - - - ---15C)----_ _ ----, __/ " ­-,O�� /Jj,­,� \-/�- ,��, --,�.,,,,�,\\ �1�1� 11�� ///, // ,�"// � I- _ 1 -7--) k -, -- --,----- - __ - , '� �,////% I � I 1� � �I I il� __ �� � � \ �, R- . `,1 "\ \ )i � 11� I ", 191 1 1 - 1______7 � , I i , _�, "AL::: - I I �', , ,14.6,( ___�� I � '-� - -, ,J::�q 4, / / /�p �, -) -,\ IN, -,-,\ � I f I � I � �� A N'-,- '�-_t� ")6, - - ,_____� ___71 �L____ � ,_____� - 'I, r 11,_ , I 1[ / X/w/&, / /I I / ___-��__ --------- , ,­ . ...... 1 _`N� , , � "`Z�,' � ­--I�­,/) '? 49,;75 � � - ,<-, , " I-) � I // "' , __1 " - ___ N\1 I kN,/­­ ( �__ __._­,,,_, , _�� ) J,� I 11 I " e_ ��__ 741. , � Vill, 6I I � ,�, / ,��, 1-1 "Z�: __,__--,� _­­ - - ii'll ­\ ______� 0 __�_ _�-S7-��-` ­ - ��,���-_34---�z - .1� fflx�/" I _� -"-/ � � I V11MUH/M /, I ��-- -I -- 71z,�i:,-\_ 14- , -I ­5� � I I , V15o, �, - - --,:)--<- -,�_ � __ ---,�: , \ �', � � / � - �J,k�� " " N­ --� _),-1 '� I , � E f�_ ,� " , " " _"_ �) ) , I I If / � \1 � 01 / , 4" _"_/o__ � , , __�,,, � �, , �, ) f ( �­o �( `Ny I I � � I , � � 1�1 I I 1 � �_�� i 'r I \\I,I � � 0 �\ I / %"\\\qg\,\\� � � p \\ _I\N, I �>� , \\\X\\ -v�, --N, '1� / �­,, Ij ��,�I , / ,\)O-,--.,- _­�� �_,_,,�, I 2 5 ) _�_� _ _._,� ,, \ `�--- T711,A�4,� , _ __ , , N", L��,)) ,� I 49. t) ��, , - _�_.,�"..,_�'�Z�___, _,-;`�__ ___ �� �,,�. ---.--.-,\ ,� / , \., - -Pry I "N\ /x__ '4�k��" _. -, v , _��" 1XI-, ,N "'�_, �,"_ A, ,\N 1� - .// I ff " _I_ 7 5�3 "1'(A_ , 1 7 4� - - ,��,,�� �4�1_�,�., 11______I_ I., ,l -1 � � � � . _� I� I ­ \'­ ,,�� " I ,'I ,I 1`� 1��k:,��_",� _�'., x149,37` I _�11 , ", I , I -"I- 1�,, 11_!�_�_ '��__;��- I ___ -1 .,,I-, �,\\ 4z�-'��Z�_�,�_ .;- _-, -,-- _� , i ,�� , , _,� ,_�� ", - z � _� � ,, I, \_::�L�:, I ,�d, , �, ­',� , j V�, l ,�j \, ­_ I , - - - I ------ I -.-..- __ == - ,-- �)_ ,,)�,,� , , "', __ - ____ �, _� -__ - I- I I'll - -,- , \ /- ------. ------- - , F, , ,___�� _� " i _\ \� , , � /_ , � Ix I,- � " I \1 I" 0\1\\\ -,�, '� , ,\ _� __ \ N , - I 'm� �\:�,�� � -1 ,� " I ki�� '_�_� � -1 , I I -4, � ��,�� l I '\ " __� " \ ��,', k\ , �_ I ,/ \\ m \ \� \ " 0\"\:II I\ _,��_11 ,\1'7��\\ 1.\ � �, �"____��.,______�,/ - _, �, __�__ ­\,\ _��_ , � �\\��\ .- - - I , -�� '� - I "�)\�\\ ­��,��7-,, �-�7-_�'�Z,� �, \�w,� \N \�,h�\-� , I - "\\ N, ,�x 'N , 1,,\ N, \,, - \N\�'\ I- , , \v\x \\� � '�_,__:�:��_� �,__,::�� - ��.____ -\\� �, ,�_:� __ , __� �� __ _,__� ,\\�-,N-V /---- I N�11M N v ( r--:�--- \, � \\ I , 11�\ , � �\x �N� � , ,�� % I --, --�-_��"---� --�__ I \� \\� INI � ,_1 _,�� __ ��--�-��Z�--_-�- ,-- �TA��7--Z�, ,_,�� - \ �\\A\ � ./ ,,, 4 -7� -,-­�Z� --------L =Z�, _ ,�, -��`, ,\'� \ , , _L t _� , �,` N� I , _ __N ,� , , I N I - -_ __# - Z� - _�� , ) I , ,�< r_� \\\�,X\`, I si ,-, __r - NN " �x �\"\ ��_,l ,/ I , , - - -_-:�,�_-,_�,,I:�_F�=:�--- \ lz' -',>-- �\ \\ , \\M\\ \ , 1 - I.IZZR_� - , I- , I _), '(0 , X, ,\ ,:� I 1�_ /'I � �� I , , - I/ �< - - \\�J, NN\�,\\X\"�,- ,�\,`X\,�,��,N�u F : /�� ,- I I '�, , , \ r7___ � 1�� I .� h \\��\ ", , ) " I\N�\, i� /,�,�__�,_�,­�_ � , W, " ,\ \ 'M ; -,,�- 7�,� W` I \\ \ \W '� i _j � I ­_ - i 7 � I ,):� � I I - / I . � ,\�Xl --- 7--, 1 1 \\�� \\ �'\\) �lli� I � i I 11 � � \1 I I 1 1 7 �\� \ I v N, I I [___T--I I I 4, -,- � 1 1 1 - ;1/f / /X/ I., I I , I I I ( I 7`1 i ,J! l i I // � )ili � � . L � -,�"` I I ( /// I I )p? � � //// v / - /­ � / / 11 ,, I ­ - -_�,��,, / I /0 " X, I .- / i .- � ` L-J I W �/ , , �// I` � I I / // � -�n ��­ -,�A--: ­ - -_ - /�/ ,1�5�5� 1 , I A` I - \ : : _�,'�71_ 1 ------ � , ,/�, � I - , - � � A--/r--,,, ___ - \y\ ��-�*,�,Z�- -- - ��� - �,,/ � �,X�X j _,�_�I, \ I, , ,� , - - - I , , � \\ _�_"� -,� ��-_-_�_,- -- - L ��� , -Z',­,-----��M�,,- - N/6i-------N NN >-, I I , I - �_ ­�� � ,�\ I- - I " v �--� - --,-:�� - �-_ : _­=1 -,,I- �___ I- 1� - , \, W\,�_, __ :_Z:_�_�___�_ " , , I � �Z_�:; __ �_��-_,, F ic��--==-= ---_� -�_ -_� _�, "Av'�_ � , ­_________ I-` � _� - --- -, , '?' ,� ,� , L= %11'�,,� ��Z:� __._=�� - 4 �� 1��l -1, 1`N I 1 ­________________�_7______4� � - �__ I I � /� --- �,,,, I i , --,, ", \ � y I -,�,---:-��-�")�E���E-:z=z7=:z--:::=EEEHE��� , ---.-------- I � �', , ,­�`��% __ - : - 1 "' " �-,,--� �- ---____---::�:7- __j�- , I `� \ Z-::-�-:��-:�--�:�----�-7--���:�===�- � I /.-,- �_ � " III I y I - i 2�'�--.��_, ,--_�, ---- - ­ I- , , __� � I, , - !��,7 11�� �-_� , \ I, - - _ -,L- �! 2�2_�_ , , I) - , I/ 11 , = = = I , . I ,___'____Zz:��_ __ _==� ___=�', - ___ - ­­1 __ � . -1 \ � = =i �-�� ,�, �_­­Nl IN � \ ,�_' -=:�-=-�­ ,_ - ­_ �_________ -_ / �,` � ­\ �Y-­ I _ " I ­ __ - ­ - -1 � I ,/ '_ .--- 1� 1��_ ��:z --- --- , � N, __ __,��,_ -, - -, _�, / _:__ I- ,�__-,, N 11 -- -- -- N -_ � I I � "`�, _t_-_� I \ � .7 _�,,� �_, \NN. 2 (' ,N7 N\\ ( --,., \ ) "N, . � \ / -41, '- �-­ =��=� ,209-20 �,"____' X 1,12)s�� \ . , � 1� I !� u, 4 4) _ / __�`� '-,,. "\N, N\ , ____ 11 -, N--;�T_-__1-,- __ '��-' 1, IN, �:� - � IN, )i � _�=_ _ _ \ ---- 2( - mz� _1�1�1 � , � / ,_"1_1___­ / I "N 7-:= = � 11 I __ , � � �_ I .. - ��,._ 1_,��11. � - ---� "' ')05 I.. ­_� 1�� - �,� 1. -_ I.. "I � �N`, I ,," ­l�_-.-,Y__� .,-.- __-, I I , I/ I - ',� �_ , ­ _<��,�_j 1__' ��_,, - NI l � ___ ­­ �" . . "I . - � \��Zk,�_ , /'�_�____�__� I � I �� / I -,, _�� / / ­�____,�A_� ----, ,­­:�=­ -_-_� ­ � , 7 "/"' _�`/� __ �' /' I., " - ,_�' l - � � - __�. - \,),/ , , / -"-- �___,____ 1-1l , \ I � 1 14---- - "IN < .. , . , ) I ; _'­� , k4- `,,�/ , I . �/ V/ . ., - \ I/ � /` . I , )// )� I - --"-, 1, �Y/'� '?Q5,"I­, , / - I '/ I I � I ',"', , l o­`1 1�\' " ��' �_�N I ',��'�N�1_1��_�,"­_ I - -�Z!,�___.� ",_� NN,, IN, , \ �',���,,� �-�, ,�-jz<z��,-,,Z�, , ,. 'I IN - ��-��% " I , \ �,��--,k\�,-�-��,�,� 11111� ,,�, ��\ \ � � / � � ,,�`�, ',,­�-,-,,�,,­,,Z�, `� 1��, \ "\IN., , \ � �_�N� NNN�,,,�-� - I �7 I ,�, , , , � ��::�Iz I_, I II , ---,-,�� , ,� - �� ­ � I\ � �,:� � ,�_ , ���,��,��-��:��,�,����,,,�����,�-,�,-,�"",."R�� 1�­ -- � � , _�_Z, �� �\ `,, -��,��--��,­,�­��"'4 � _,�,,��,-" IN, ,,Z',, ,- --Z� , � Z-� ��,�4,�', -NN, I ,/`M� (I , ,� "," NN, \N, , �, , -4,, ��4v� �..,_" , ,� , , I�� - ,�,:�.--��4�--�, '1'LNN,-N,,/ "I I ,�, , � � l� � 0 \ ­1 -­N,��,�,,�N- ,,�_,',,",,,,, � � -1 "­_�� ' � � , ,� --> , , �� '�� __� , ,:�`I� , ,�-,�, ��'N�\' -, ]__��_S��_�_ IN- "'�N� , ` ' � � Yl ) 0,30 '�> __ 11,14 � / i : _J�' �(X�, I I i � (� rxl__,�_', , ,,, ,�'_,_�,- '159.62 / - , `,�� -- 0 . / I )C-,---- \\ ",% I/ ?X1 - - I "" \,I IN ­ - /( '� 1Q11 `N� 'i , - - .-,., , , - \��<11 -1l, I -l'NN, 1��"59i�i ,\ i��, 1( J, , I , - ­­ _-, 1� � __� � __� I �� ". I I .�,­­ " ,- /., I ,­�.___ � I ,� , ) �__.__"�'-' 51" / __ __ 1-`k " -;,--\ � _' ,1,q-8. 18 \ '149.8 1 / , " ­�_�- A,16.1, I , �,,),, � -- -.--- - -,�-j - _� , Y 4�1 " .11 - �-- -�(-;,�\ � � � I ( /I ( "\ (� � � 'I -1 _­ 1. r7� , I � ��� ��,\� I 'I ,.�, --- ­ - I -, ___ _�� , ��=-�-r­.�� �_ � -7� -A,�,-\o - ;, \ - ' ,_r_- / ) ,14� 25 - , I I - - - - -7- . , I I I =. _7:�,,­ -.- -, ,:� !��_", I " � . I ,� �, �, I � ­­ -_ -_­', I I �j 1__�" "�_,­' _J��,� _�­­_,", / , � ;�, ,_I- , _3 � \ I III ,149�b __ , , , � I �� �,�� I Z-1 .�,:� I , I \_ , \� _� 1_�_ - ,,, ,:Z�,,,�,,,, , ! I I \i \\N I I ,,\\' r 11 /,,, / '", N. I N I" \ i �_11 I I , N\\(, \ , ��,, I " / �� I ___1 ,�,_, - _NNL,__-____� '�__� I'l-, hl � I t i I -- � _,/� I I 1:� 11 ;,�`N �k" - I \\\\X , " ) I, "I " - -- __:�;7,-�:�_- - - / I � , I " - ---!: -E:_::�:r- -4- ---'-' " ,f>' y "­ � , /` - I 11 � \N , N\ "� � ,- , ,I --�� -,- 11 \ ,, ��REEN I I �: ', / ,�, ---- T \" N IN ' `N_`N___­_­_­­__ , �___, I -I u " ,,� ­ ,��,_'�_�__�,;_; �� I I N, .- , il - �<­, :��., :,:� � �11 I ��_____ \ / ) I 8-ri-I \\Mfil �, - , ' / ,; - _.. �Il 1�� I 71,�Z.,_�__ __ - _�_�� I - � � - -- - I, k .152 ' �.'__ � z ,\ � �___ �/� - 33 _� I 1�le - `�`:::'_�-E�---- I \ " -, I 1,� / \ le�,�--�� _:�4- �j lo§'I - - ) I I �, __ � _ - J L ��� I - __.­�n ��_-)) I / /11 � 7 42.5 13 I ; 11� � NN I 1 :��--2:��'-�--:�- --��-_ ­­�.,-- �_11_,. (k� 1_f�_,._, A/ J) ,, ""I- " '\�� ,� I �­ , I I _13,1 i p u, 0 I � / . N ,� Q, 4 U - - "I'll, \\ \N N N ,\ ,\ \ ---- 'I ,\ �\ I. " 1� I, - ar - - ___" 40�, _= I' - - � _\7 \\ __��_,"" / / � i � VA ,�� __ " --- ) N� I I ___ � "= - ­ �� _i� __,_ - , \ \ Irl­__ �.� ,�� " 7�� �_, _� -, -= �_- ---: - I�Q��,�,,�__­l ,I� I �, ,\\ 1, I \1 �1� ___ __ I/ / I�I ��_' . ,__714 --- � ­ - � f I I 1 J! N\ - \ _� , ___ -,--I.--- � I I I I , " I , __)_ 1> -,-- __ I, � �1 \ � - ----- L_,I 1�. � ...�,� , � ,,,_Z��­7 _NN­ " � - \ ... �__ I- � Ili K " ,,, , _­� �_ ,I X/ _--_,- \,,, ZZ-::_ , I -1 - � 4 \� ____�___ --.---- ��/ _,--�_�- - I I " - � 11 If, Ill N" III ...�, . __:7 1 \X ______ �_ _�=_ ­__ � - , � ---� - IN, I, IV- Np 1i \\, 38)jp__I��11 '_,�__, - I - _t��7��_��M_�5��- " _� '.1 I __1 �\ 11 I ,, �, ,/')_, "\ - __�Z� - - X\�\ �, - �, �� ,, \ '�\ � 171, �i ,-, , ,3 . I I I XX _�.__� ��_�_ �_____k__ �-,�_�.,,,��1�1'1' __�_. 15 F- l-,- 1,55 ----__z�:z,,�, ,,, -11 __ -<INZ� 1, 11 I L 137,01 /' _,__l ­� _ , - � - I -, \_1�1� ­ I ,\�OIN ", �M , - ��,_ �_r­ - � ,,e 50)341\1 __ ,_� , I�"W'W"N __- & N_ I ,�,�, \� �\, � \ & __� I NN "' , �_� �� I �, �I � I ,�,�', ��\ � , 1:�11�\_Il � 1� - I ___ �� AA 1�____._ , \,\00"Nol - __ I I I, \\- I, \ I I " ,!�-­Nz:;� _� \ �,- S­'­---7---T- -- --- -- - �� - �_'��,_�_'�_�,�, \ \ � x 1 b2,6.3( � ,��______ - - , lt_��,_, � I NI, _<�\ � (I �-- ��- �-��,_ , , �, � __-, - I I 1. I - _T�i :�,�___ V 1� �_V__ � \� �_\ �� 'I- _ _ _ )� � I ��-,,,, 7 I��, � W/ I I __� , - �) ,I �') 43 _� ----_-I­,,_N ­,,�_�-��Z: � \ �iI� ,� A�< / \/ E -I, -�_ I 4 - I _� 1_��_- '-,-' - ,�, / l, I i I- �,__� .--, - -2- -- L_:::_­��, \\\ \Ni, - I I - � I,'-,, , 1� III\ ) ID v kA-,-I- -) I, I 2 ____�� - '�\\ l-,\\ �L , - / ___�__:= , \\ S -, , - , \ � I ___II \ � ­�� -1 N��,\ IN, -) I _�_ __ 4 �,_111�____ / / _� I -�, _____ �,,� ­�= I I " - _;:� I I \ --��--7,�:_�:� - ,�_ �,� - � .. � r - I �l i ; i: I/ I � " __�_` � ,_E�,�__�,Z_7_��,�_ ��_� - ,� \ , I y , ,_,� _� � I�-�-,� - � -� 1�','� , , nk -\N'\ ,\ \\, �) I �)I �\ V,�1_7� - - - -`i,---�, � ) � .1� I I I)A�4�1 \ \ -l- - - - `_��, -, \ NN \ \ - \ N, �\,:\\ 'I / � \ � I I, " I \ I., �� I \ � I ,l" \ � I � - - __� __ ) I A��-� --�-�-,- , - - - � � , �,\� �� ��5� ��_��_�_�� , � � Il � ,�,,,�\"� L, \�� \�,, I \'� � - - - ��, - � " / , I ", I \ � , I -- - �� ��_�_ __ / --,� � _� � _ � \ � / ,,- \ � " ) I/ 4 �?,<�,�,�%,��__ I , " , , _/ I \ \ f I , ��- \ I I, I I .�, � " t I Z��S,� �g I y - -, __�,_ __ , __ �_, r I I �,�,��,� i I r ,IkQ ,� , , 1\1 I , , I I I - ,__�_ , , _­ � I i I., � /I � ,:r If __,�- , T'�, I \ \ I . I \ I - I �_ - i I -I- 1, \ , I I j I ,�, '�,,-, � �' W I- e ­,,�__:>,::�, / \ - �� I I 1. -1 __ ­ I- � 'r , I ,\ I� 'I I \ \ , __ - _� 11 1� -4�� _� � ,�`,,N \ \� \ 1> I I , I I _­--� _;�;��­�=- , 11 , - I ,.� \ " , \ , � � , '� " 1� V\ ­7-4­:�:�___�_�___� �---�� �_1:5 / � V 1 5 4, 21 �j \ I I"' � f_:� � \ 1_' I _ I � � ��,�___�\21,1>�\\\"\ XN\\ ,:� , _�) " \ 11 ,,� _�� ,I', , ,N -,��,-\�, __:Z:�_:_ - 1 �7` , I i �' \ . __ , I � 1_____�__,l_ u -�,',N 1 1 'If , -\,\ N, \ � I - --��_�, ,� t� " / \_ - � ( I I; \<, � 1�,,� \\ \ \ I,,,��, , 11 I - - - - I I �,\ ��,�;7 1 1 ___f � \ I I \ � � ::::�- :�,-�� � , � 1, f-, --::�41z�� La., - -, \ ,,, \ ,,, , ,� � \ \ �� 11,�,�, - �\ � 1,16 " \ `� i �;--,­ - ,r, / / ­­ / I � ----r -l-"I N�---,- �\ \ �_��_ ___ -11 1�_ -- - ��, '��, L� I 11 ?, , � ", . , " I \ / --�X�-\�� \� ­�� - -_­ ll, ... �,,N, < ,� �, ,� \�- �,� -, \ _\_ " NN " - I I" \ ,�­_, "__ - , _� -, ­ , I I ___ -,I_ 'l,' "�, \ -\ I-, - , / I- I- - I _�__5�:_ - � /l/n - - _ � I _,%� / �\ �� / - I;, � ,� IN \ 1\ 1, � \ " I- / -lit 'l -, f / " �,` / , I�,�,,,, N, � , 41 \ I I �/ � _"� 6 / \\\N '\-- 'Lj� -\-­-.� , ��:��-���> \ \ ) ,_k­�' I __ __ - - ��_ _�N 11 ,\ , ) __ ��,_�� � A v � , -1 � �� '_� I \�� , ,� I m , � , N _\ \ ) ) L , / �-:� �, � ,� m \ I m , � 0\� " I , / I I �� - �_ , I __� , " ,1-��-,M-��-- - ) � I " � " \ , '�---- I I ,� I ", , � I- \1 - - I \ k,��x N\�, --��-, , CN ; � ) �\N �Y, , I,- _-�� ) ,' , Ii - I � , � .,,� � � ; � _._�� - , \ N� il " N, , I --, ,-, � I I i _�� I ,�, I ��, 1� � ,:: - - /,V�_,N' - - , ��, , li, ,!�� " � _,,­ ,�_,­ V 1 ), - � I � : CD / \\ \\ � _V , _1\ 1� � ,I, , I'll - , , ,, " ,� i ) I (p �,,, , �r \ \\ N ��\ , �v ) -----N�,, � N\ I " ) " , � __��,� 11 - - �, \ '<�­I` � , ,\ ,�,�', _�< , \ \ , � ,,N - � 1\ � , - ),_­_ `� � � I cx-,­i)'­� I,- - � , ,­1 -11 ", � I� � I , ". � / \ 1 <7� 1�1 � " < -, - ,�\ , ,�,,�, N"\ \ ,Y,,�7� !! I " 'A ^I Z�� I . , , - - 1 � - "'?, " , , ,� . , � I ,.- " � I _ - I ""N' , ) -\ � ��111­ \ �, ) I I ; I �,��\ -- _,N -_ � N�, ,,��\� \ - 11 / I l :,�� I \,� , N, , � � \�LN-,' - I / "N `�- I :1 N, , ��;,, , " " ,� N\ \ ) i I � \\,,N�,,,_,-::7 I, ,, �', \ V�'__ ,�) - �.\ I ! � - -�-`�,-�� " � I ,>, I, \��\�N�- ,\\N,, g �.��,�\ -,��., 'N r�_� I , , l_� ' r 1�1 . - N� \ , � "I - �\ I " - \ �M\\\\._:�� \ j, i I , ­_ 1, 1�_ I I 'N � , " ��:_:,1'4 N� 7 � A \ � /, / e I \� \ IN /t � -, I � I", \� - - -- I I I " ) , �� /// / C) � . I , - �l\ \ I, , _- 1 11 ,� \ v >,/,,f ,-"\ III, � - " � , IN � , � , , .NN,I1 -, I 1< I I ,,, , / , \ - " . I " f _­N � ,\' " .- " � ,� , � , � :k- � 11 �/X/", /' ! \ �' �,�/"I, ", I I / , I ,�,� ,q I I A� 11 IN "_ I , i 1'1�', , I X L\\ I I 11 IN I � 11 I\ I V, / - -,\ " �..", � I I \\ �\N, \ , � ', I � _11" " Y _ I I 11 \ I � � , � \ " � \ / - lc�_ I&\ ,� \, , , ot I . Z I N � ��,,\ 167� I s I,\ � \ I, _ - �,;,� � / _� /_� \ / / � I 1�1 \ 1� N, I. 11 IN 11\1 I I 11 " : �\ , \ e 11 �X, I � /-, , , I , \, � � , I N, \ I \ M __l W \ N,� \ I g��\ , I-,, \ \� , - -ilf, 11 I , , � 1� 7, N, IN ,,, 11 I- ill// , \ �\,:\ I I \ I ,:� " � IN 1. I I I 11 �\ I I fi, I � I�I "I , IN I I I I I I � I , , A �', ' T //, �! __ I �\,� .1 f ) , Nl ... , , , \ _� 11 �/ / � I , l' /_ I, hi !�,,l I I � \` !67,4() - '11�1 ll�ll � I I I I � 11 \ I �_ "_ �V/_` /�,, I'\v 1111 I 1, /// I I I \ � I �, )l , 1, / I I I I I i : /� ,I , � I ,,�� I I \ I I I i'll 'No"y kil, i I , '' _1 l , v 7`_ '' I'! L.-I '' I 1, I I I I I I 11 � W.., I�N 'N' IIIII'm ii I I I I 11 ,I I �\ \ i iyl� I, I � I , ,��IN -1 / ,I X, I i I j I I I I I'- N, .1 11 t � 1, \ I -� ;-\� v, � I I I I I I ?s "' � i ill I ,N­ . \M , ii I ) . i I , I �\ I, I w I i I "I " ,- ,� I - �,,�-� �5�,�.�-�=-,:I , III � � \qF,7 �, , �� _ , � �� ,� "-­,:� , " 1�_�-. 1. 11 _,,,<, V:_, /57" .1,�' - - I �,', ­,"", " .1, I �11 1'11)� I � 1� _/ \ " ..... .. " " - ---I I I t ��. I�W��,, �1�5�_;,;;- \ ( F �,,�� , , '� ,��, " ��, . " II-, ,,,,I, 11 , "�,,� "-- --, � I I ­:r �11 :��. �� I "I � ,,, � � I " - `�_, 'I,- �,, L , _5��', , ,,, - �_, 1I ,.__,_�l �', - "­.,�­,_ ,� X V 1,9 �., g �, � ff -, ,,,,�,��,­��,�_�l, ,`-->��,� ��_-�, /� ? I " , I, I 1-`II, I 11 �' .f " - .�� (7 " / Ir " 11�1 n", I I , J _�� _'_� I _,�_ / " _1�1 ( ,�/_-1 I _____� �,� / - I - � r-I - i i I� V, " i ��Z, r�_�,Z,,�� . , I /J) 1" I-\, , .11 - -) 'r . � 11/,�, �_"`­ - I � I - I- �� - , 11 I _`­ I �f�,�., i ,--��',(_,\__,��,��O-:_ I I I [ � �-,2' � I 1_,___.__J. , - " I - I I/ 1� lq�_,-'-��,\, \'I-- I'll, I __ � 1-1 I I . I � RI A I �� � I f � � 1 7 1 �, I I I I � _- , ) __ �, , r' I _�� __,,�,� Y - I �, . I � ­ I- I l � 1, � � _� � , I I _:�Z__ -, - I� 1 ,q �� , �k_ 6 � I � i I i_� � I I -, I I �_ � I r- , ____ I . I � , I - I ) \ j - , - � , I � , , , I �, I" -- -- - -N�, ,�,/ �,�-,-ia Y�-4-\-�_/ l/ , / \ " � ,, � I . - I \ - ,i , , " / ,�_ _ N I I I . I � I r I � )) (,;/( (,,,/; , , I if0 le I ,_ , V, 0, � " �,�/" - �1 ;�/ / // I � � 1,, I I � ` � ,/'_�, I 1 �4.`.. / I �1,11, � . I I � I xl ,'/­w"v, � I '\' "I ��,� M�,Ml"(16,�, I - ___\-_� l/'� I �/\ I I --(' I M'�&"/�-; (� I 11 �0�11 evo�,,;�V�11� �1' \ � I 71//10 le" I I 1 1 1 1 1 - I , /g � - `,�.­J, 1 11 1 1 . . , , -, I I I /�'// I , � �,k\ � , I I ", � � I I r P/_; , ,-\ � I I �'� I, I `4 < ) , , ��Zl , I t I - I , � 1\ \ � , , �-, I 0� / ,)z :��a I I I _-I,_ I I � . ,,, - I /V, . . . . . I I ­, I I I ,� / jl �, % ,"l"I" I 1�, � ;,WA .�i �, I L� I �' I - 'I 11, I I __ IN, , - - I � .. I � I � - I- - I , I , , / � - � , ) I , I- I � , 11 I i�_ 1, ;, . I .1 I Z 11 ,_, - I - I I I I - - I I . � I I � I - I I I I , I " I I I 11, I I � X11 I _--�, I � I I � I I 11 I I . L , I I I I I - � I I I , I (�� .� ? I I I I I \ ; - I I I I , , I � I I I I .1 I IN , I I 11 I I , I ­1 N, � , I I I � � I I 1 7 �, '' 1, I I I � I I � I I i_\ I I I I I I 11 I I I � I , I I I I I , .1 I I I � I , I I : I I - I I I � I I I � I , I � I I I I I I I , I I I � I I I , � I I I I . I � I � I - , I I I I , I I , I I � I 11 I I I � I I � I I I I I I I 11 I . � I I I � , I � � I I . - I I I � , - I I 1� I I - I , � I � I I �_i: I � ; � � 11 � 11 I I � I � I I I I I I . I . I I I - I I , - I I , I I I � � - .1 I I - I I . I , � �, � - I I I I � I I I I I I - I I I I I I ) I . I I I I I I I I - I � I I I . I � . . . I � I I 1. � I I I I I I � I , I i I I /J- : . � 1-1 I I 11 � � I ��