Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000 BISON AVE1000 Bison Ave sew pY-0i COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING CORRECTIONS Telephone: (714) 644-3200 By:Genia Garcia Associate Planner By Marc Mvers Assistant Planner Date: l `31-- GJZ Address: Plan Check NO: g :Christ y Teacue Assistant Planner By. Corrections Required:-a.V-Le4 Z Legal Description: Lot Block Section Tract V-) 114 Resubdivision required to combine lots or portions of lots when construction or alterations are in excess of $5,000. ki ,'(//�� Covenant required. Please have owner's document and return to me. Lot Size Zone �F_e, Proposed Use (44(11644 2,11042556101�]L`1 h L Required Setbacks :511"e41 600 Ai&4C C- . t Front Rear � r Right Side Left Side FAR WOE RKS Lot area (site area sq.ft.): signature notarized on the attached tV)4e-r-i'oe C-0y"p)e--Hov, q r,e n ovt i:5ky, I% 1 t I sq.ft. Base Development Allocation (BDA): ! Comm sq.ft. [-0.5 x site area sq.ft.] unless specified in Land Use Element FAR permitted, without variance: (A) Comm res Plc Square footage permitted: Comm i res Pkq sq.ft. [(A) x site area sq.ft.] Maximum FAR allowed with variance: ( ) Comm res._ Pkg Maximum square footage allowed: Comm res sq.ft. [(B) x site area sq.ft.] PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: (C) Base FAR use sq.ft. (D) Reduced FAR use sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. (E) Maximum FAR use sq.ft. Y sq.ft. (F) TOTAL SQ.FT. [C+D+E] sq.ft. PROPOSED FAR: PROPOSED WEIGHTED DEVELOPMBNTT• FAR Use category (G) sq.ft. Base sq.ft. Reduced sq.ft. Maximum [ F site area sq.ft. ] Weighting Factor Weighted Sq.Ft. (H) ( G x.H ) x 1.00 X 1.67 X 0.50 TOTAL WEIGHTED SQ.FT.(May not exceed BDA) sq.ft. sq.ft. _AA Provide tissue overlay of calculations to verify provided square N� d� Required Parking Proposed parking (Indicate number of stalls provided) Total On -Site Parking 50 (0 �7 ��""� ��� Standard 3'10 Compact It?'7 l / Y(cv+«"�8 In -lieu Parking sq.ft. footage. 6?Ll— Dimension building height !measured from natural grade to average and maximum roof height 01C• 1 Show natural grade line on all elevations -- Show all rooftop mechanical equipment and dimension from grade directly below. Fi w Indicate location of trash containers on site plan. 044, Number of Stories &- Floor Plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences, etc. in relation to the property line. r _P* Fair Share Contribut Y)14 San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor SPECIAL. APPROVAL REOUIRED THROUGH: Modifications Committee Plannin Commission: /LIl. Use Permit (j�C iBY✓✓t� Variance Re subdivision/Tract Site Plan Review Amendment Other i72&) )I2&( 1), 7706(AZ) Uil,/T 8 Public Works: Easement/Encroachment I Permit (OVIAt4—wI%J� E4ESubdivision Engineer : 2 sZ �n� ����� S � � �/ � J 1 � G. Traffic Engineer Approval of Landscape Plane �G Sly G��t�t�O�rJf�OJ�E� Comb lei .. Building Department: Grading Engineer � �(7✓� lYil�Or'�%OV1�[�J�crOYJ Parke Department: Approval of Landscape Plans !%✓1%y P)14 Coastal Development —Permits-- Approval In Concept (AIC) No. (Note: File 3 sets of plans: Coastal Development Permit No Waiver/Exemption 6 NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200. F0RMS\COMM-Z0N.00R Conditions of Approval Use Permit 1726(A) 1-7-88 1000 Bison Avenue Plan Check 134-92 Interior Completion of Fellowship Hall 1. Fullfill previous condition 2. Substantial conformance 3. Deleted Osof. 506 parking spaces pff 5. 45 minutes between service 6. Handicapped parking 7. Vehicle & ped. circulation ©k 8. Grading permit 9. Grading plans 10. Haul operations 11. Erosion Control Program 12. Runoff control 13. Slope erosion control O 14. Landscape plan At, 15. Lanscape maintenance *16. Light spillage & glare 17. Fire suppression 18. Fire Dept access 9 Equipment screening DEPARTMENT ACTION Planning Letter `"�✓YCG �c� Planning Plans approval Planning Plans approval Planning Letter of compliance ETraffic Plans approval raffic Plans approval Building Plans approval Building Plans approval Building Plans approval Building Plans approval Building Plans approval Building Plans approval PBR Plans approval Planning Letter of compliance Planning Letter from Elec. Eng. Fire Dept Plans approval Fire Dept Plans approval Planning Plans approval Fre-kd Nieo 1-4`'] Conditions of Approval Page 2 20. 50 ft. height limit (21; Trash enclosure screening 22. Sight Distance 23. Sidewalk 24. No action 25. No action Yi , 26. Evening activities restriction �p 27. Building roofing %21 8. Facility use information 1 r. (29: Ingress/egress headlight 11 Sound attenuation Planning Plans approval Planning Plans approval i%ieic7 6hia� Traffic Plans approval Public Works Plans approval Planning Letter of compliance Planning Plan approval Planning Plan approval Planning Plgps �!%lGP approval Planning Acoustical report (Follow-up letter from acoustical engineer required prior to Certificate of Occupancy) Conditions of Approval Use Permit 1726(A) 1-7-88 1000 Bison Avenue Plan Check 134-92 Interior Completion of Fellowship Hall CONDITION DEPARTMENT 1. Fullfill previous condition Planning 2. Substantial conformance Planning 3. Deleted 4. 506 parking spaces Planning 5. 45 minutes between service Planning 6. Handicapped parking Traffic 7. Vehicle & ped. circulation Traffic A 8. Grading permit Building 9. Grading plans Building 10. Haul operations Building 11. Erosion Control Program Building 12. Runoff control Building 13. Slope erosion control Building 14. Landscape plan PBR 15. Lanscape maintenance Planning 16. Light spillage & glare Planning 17. Fire suppression Fire Dept 18. Fire Dept access Fire Dept 19. Equipment screening Planning ACTION Letter Plans approval Plans approval Letter of compliance Plans approval Plans approval . Plans approval Plans approval Plans approval Plans approval Plans approval Plans approval Plans approval Letter of compliance Letter from Elec. Eng. Plans approval Plans approval Plans approval Conditions of Approval Page 2 20. 50 ft. height limit Planning 21. Trash enclosure screening Planning 22. Sight Distance Traffic 23. Sidewalk Public Works 24. No action 25. No action W 26. Evening activities restriction Planning 27. Building roofing Planning 28. Facility use information Planning 29. Ingress/egress headlight-_ _ _ _ _. Planning 30. Sound attenuation Planning Plans approval Plans approval Plans approval Plans approval Letter of compliance Plan approval Plan approval Plans approval Acoustical report (Follow-up letter from acoustical engineer required prior to Certificate of Occupancy a o i f- A4ARINERS CHURCH March 3, 1992 Mr. Don Nunsicker City of Newport Beach Planning and Building Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92659 REt Mariners Church.-! ' Dear Mr. Munsickert Mariners Church is in receipt of and has read and understands the Conditions of'Approval of Use Permit 1726 and its two subsequent amendments and hereby states that all of these conditions are acceptable and will be adhered to. Yours very truly, Brian V. Norkaitis Chairman, Building Committee BVNtirIMc Enclosure Pot emjtw. RI'iatnn 46;r.,r waa0-.-'kN ;dr rv,vrsr• l8 e� •,� C.IL" Amt V�ririn i / {•n•Nr•hU1lr r...e -l.i dit).b'/u v�/s/e Zii r' LY1L�, f l�.'�t•«.�re`C 14 Ban Joaquin Mille Tranaportaticn Corridor Fee ModifieatLOn• Committee planning Commiesio� Usr Permit �/5! '1' variance, Resubdivision/Tract Site plan Review Amendment Other »2-47, t,7 2Lo(H l), ,7.�Z/W) w}1 ic_ Hork* t Easement/tnoroaehment Permit --- lubdivi*ion )Engineer _ J Traffio Bngln*ar , �0✓x�' P✓! S' �• �� •% J 44r Approval of landscape Plans 111✓GettGLo eypyvvye/ But},¢,},na Caearemente Grading Cnglnear Parkr o*oar manta. •�U/' 1•/1+�.✓�`PI" CPVN�n IQ.F-1E►•) Approval of Landscape Plans U•7/v1• n..rl D-i2Somant Farmitst Approval in Con"pt (AIO) No. jH9te,t Pit* 3 sets of plans; sit*, floor, and elevations) Coastal Development Permit No. Waiver/Exemption NOTMI it .is rho responsibility of the applicant to circulake their plans and obtain the neC*seary5f approvaia from the departments checked above. if you have questions regarding yrur appltaation. plaaea contact m at (114) 644-3200. tOMMIS510M RS °CITY OF NEWPORT t �& MINUTES WOU LM ;% June o, F7/4 )Not Planning Commission discussed further the width of the access road both to this property and that of the property to the north proposed for the Toyota research and development program. They also discussed elimination of the second access from Bison Avenue which was shown on the plot plan. I City Engineer Nolan commented on other easements ' in the planned community in order to clarify acces� to several other lots within the area. Parking requirements for churches and related facilities were, discussed. 1 There being no others desiring to appear and be j heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X� : Motion was made to approve Use Permit No. 17266 All Ayes 1 subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial con- formance with the approved plot plan and elevi'Cions (not.ing the elimination of the 1 future driveway), except for minor modifica- tions'which may be approved by the Department ` of Community Development and changes required ( below. The required number of parking spaces shall be provided at all times as each phase of development is completed. 2. All signs shall be approved by the Director of Community Development, 3. That landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the, Director of Parks, Beaches and Recreat 3n. All landscaped) areas shall be continuous) maintained. 4. All exterior illumination shall be subject to review and approval of the Director of Community Development. S. That the proposed classroom buildings shall be adequately insulated from noise generated from Jamboree Road and Bison Avenue. Said noise mitigating measures shall be approved by the Department of Community development. 6. That all applicable conditions of approval of Tentative Tract 6662, Tract 6680, and Resub- division 328 be completed; including sidewalk construction, dedication of access and utility. i Page 11. ! '? K' E &'^ .'1' 7 .� A 2 T H I..i 3 s. i L. 7J � W, t •.++ r• ,la F• .:� •i COMMISSIONERS Aw , r, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTE April 9, 198' ROLL CAL. 1 11 Jill I 1 INDEX 3. That the project will not have any nignificnnt environmental impact. 4. That approval of thib amendment to Use Permit No. 1726 will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morale, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental Or injuriou4 to property as improve» mants in the neighborhood or the genera), welfare of the 21ty. \' CONOTTIONsr 1. that development shall be in substantial confor- mane* with the approved plot plan and floor plans. 2. That all applicable conditions of approval of Use _ Permit No. 1726 as adopted by the Planning Commis- -lion on June 6, 1974 shall remain in effect. 3. That the drop-off area shall be subject to the further review and approval of the City Traffic Engineer. 4, that the Planning commission may add or modify conditions of approval to this .use permit, or recommend to the City Council the revocation of this use permit, upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this use permit, causes injury, or in dstrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, Comfort, or general welfare of the Community. 5. That this amendment to Use permit No. 1726 shall • expire unless exercised within 24 months from tho date of approval as specified in Section 20.80.C90 A of the Newport Reach Municipal Code. 6. That applicable State standards for interior classroom noise shall be met. This may require the elimination of openable windows on the westerly side of the classroom buildings and the installation of air conditioning. 40 January 1, 118e' Pr' . ' •`•�y CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH _ INDEX Rao- CALL 2. That the proposed development is consistent with the land use Element of the General plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses, 3. That adequate off-street parking and related vehicular Circulation are being provided in conjunction with the proposed development. 4. The proposed number of CoMpaot car spaces con- stitutes 25 percent of the parking rsquiramant which is within limits generally accepted by the Planning Commission relative to previous similar applications. S. Deleted, 6. Deleted. 7. Deleted, 8. The approval of Use Permit No, 1726 (Amended) will not, under the circumstanCea of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing And working in the peighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to propexty and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare_ of the City and further that the proposed modification to allow the use of compact parking spaces is consistent 'with the legislative intent of Title 20 of this Code. Condiriens• 1. That all previous applicable conditions of Approval of Use permit No 1726 as approved on June 6, 1974 and Amonded on April 9. 19d7, shall be fulfilled. 2. That the proposed development shall be in substan- tial conformance with the approved site plan, floor plans, elevations and sections, except as noted below. 9. Dolated. 4. That a minimum of 506 off-street parking spaces shall be provided on site. S. That at least 45 miautas shall be provided between the first and second service on Sunday mornings, -25- R01.L CALL 1312 T W1.1 16': 1'b rL-up A:w,!w�• ,w SSf4NERS 40 AV CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P . 0 r Minv 1 January 7, IM 6. That the required number of handicapped parking spaces shall be designated solely for handicapped self parking and shall be identified in a manner acceptable to the City Traf£ie Engineer, Said parking spaces shall be accessible to the hand- icapped at all times. One handicappad sign on a post shall he required for each handicapped parking spree. 7. That the on -site vehicular and pedestrian circula- tion systems shall be subject to further review and approved by the City Traffic Engineer. g. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit to be approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 9. That a grading plan shall include a complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities, to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants. 10. The grading permit shall include, if required, a description of haul routes, access points to' the site, watering, and sweeping program designed to minimize impact of haul operations. 11. An'erosion, siltation and dust control plan, if re- quired, shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department and a copy shall be forwarded to the California Regional Later quality Control Board, Santa Ana,Region, 12. The velocity of concentrated runoff from the project shall be evaluated and erosive velocities controlled as part of the project design. 13. That erosion control measures deemed necessary shall be done on any exposed slopes within thirty days after grading or as approved by the Grading Engineer. �14. That a landscape and irrigation plan for tho project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction •v;bedula. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape arehicaet shall certify to the Planning Department Chat the landscaping has been 1naCa11e4 in aecor- danca•with the prepared plan,) INDEX jig, i{1T TiJ Jtv,�r„v 44W CITY OF NEiNpORi BEACH �_ POLL CALL It I 15. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of woeds and debris. All vegetation shall ca regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 16. That the light system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner sa to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and Start to the adjacent properties. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed slectrical engineer; with % letter from the engineer stating that, in his ,anion, this requirement has been mac. 17. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall review the proposed plans and may require an automatic fire suppressian/sprinkler protection. { 18. ThaC the Fire Department access shall be approved . by the Fire Department. ! 19. That any roof top or other mechanical equipment and ` emergency power generators shall be screened from view. 20, Any construction on the site shall be done in accordance with the helght restriction of said area (i.s. $0 feet) and shall apply to any landscape materials, signs, flags, eta., as volt as struc- turns. 21, That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties and streets, 22, That the entrance for the new driveway on Bison Avenue shall be designed to provide sight distance in accordance with City Standard 110-L and that any street trees, shrubs, and landscaping shall be removed or trimmed as necessary to meet this requirement. 23. That a sidewalk connection shall be provided from Bison Avenue to the new. facility in the vieinity of the new driveway entrance. 24. That the Kannin; Commission may add to or modify conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend to the City Council the revocation of this use permit, upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this use permit causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, .27• a INDEX JarueYy ?, 1.913 CALL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH safety, paste. morals, comfort, or general welfare' of the community. 25. This thinus* permit 24 months from the expire unless of exercised lAs apoeified in Section 20.80.090 A of the Newport Eason Municipal Code. be 26. within bulldingsat 611 gwith ithe windows vities l end the contained closed, through he exception of September 15 untileperio9 30 p mbetween , 27: That the, buildings shall be Constructed with a non - glare roofing material. That the licap plain 28. Departments epart entapinfo mationll regarding submito usee of she facilities in the event that a Traffic Management program n.eds to be implemented six months after completion of the facility. 29 constructedat ain st such a manner thato Bison vshallenue would not allow automobile headlights to strike adjaoant residers- tial windows in the residential_ tract southerly of Bison Avenue. 30. That the buildings shall be sound attenuated in such A manner as to achieve a maximum sound level of 55 43A at the property lines. Req t to amend a previously approved use permit which permit the expansion of the exiatitng Edwards Theatre complex to ad in Newport Center, so as to, add two additional the rs with a total of 600 additional seats. Said appro also included: the approval of a new off•site parking raement to as to provide a portion of the required o treat parking spaces in the Design Plaza parking area, t approval of an amended off -site parking agreement for the fisting parking area located at the rear of the theater; a the approval of a modification to the toning Coda so as t Low the use of compact parking spaces, The propose mendment involves a request to consider ■ new off, to ing area across the street in Fashion Island, in place the previously approved parking in Design plaza. The •28- INDEX t No . 6 2'tA) lip Plan Check No. Ml 1} IZ73- W 90 oto&%%rM 4- FeAtoJbLrN 411 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING CORRECTIONS ' c�/tWEfL (a1�s2GtA By: -Y+racy "''��^�, Associate Planner Telephone (714) 644-3200 ry\gV ►2-I5�� Date: �12.8'$(( ��` Address: l oo o tswj Ave 17 I I Corrections Required: Y Legal Description: Lot Block Section Tract Resubdivision required to combine lots or portions of lots when construction or alterations are in excess of $5,000.. Lot Size Zone PC Proposed Use duuv" Required Setbacks: Front 8,401 Rear Right Side Left Side Structural Area: Buildable Area Permitted Area Proposed Area Provide tissue overlay of cal ulations to verify provided square footage. 24'33 fei^"t 5 f%4�44� 1- pe4N+eA 0%t Sot m Required Parking SOtp 1L°Atd Mttsk^ 1a4 4, (.� a`cpwvect Proposed parking (Indicate number of stalls provided) Total On -Site Parking Standard Compact h In -lieu Parking kDi mension building height as measured from natural grade to average and maximum roof height ()(P0S2 Pvnu i Rtt- co r A p 'o. S.Ofi G'►tZlia�cc+tS YR � Show natural grade line on all elevations Show all rooftop mechanical equipment and dimension from grade directly below. Indicate location of trash containers on site plan. Number of stories Floor Plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences, etc. in relation to the property line. Fair Share Contribution Paid ak m1rajiu+4 San Joaquin Hills Transportation Cprridor Fee 3�O IOe✓ 5 tL !OIL. 88��v, + Nt' (OVER) lY��N�n..1ht1aN con.rt�pors 33�1'7 rAt aR2l,S�N Wt �A�(INt'c CA PAV.uu6S ft 4 50 t 42-115 s5.3-or67 ti a SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH: Modifications Committee Planning Commission: Use Permit (i26 4Xwt4JAJ Variance Resubdivision - Tract Site Plan Review Amendment Other - Public Works- Easement/Encroachment Permit Curb Cut {ks Subdivision Engineer Traffic Engineer Approval of Landscape Plans i-'1.t9 iae '0.d-Aj C44441;wi (100 Building Department: Grading Engineer Parks Department: >A� Approval of Landscape Plans pow, Coastal Development Permits: Approval in Concept (Note: File 3 sets of plans: plot plan, floor plan, elevations). Coastal Development Permit No. Waiver/Exemption NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200. -41-, 0 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Use Permit No. 1726 Amended 1-7-88 1000 Bison Avenue PC #1772-88 and PC 1773-88 c7er, 1603 A-sS ..vo 2eTMNwq wMa- CONDITION Q A 1`1�' Fulfill previous conditions 2. Substantial Conformance C7 3. Deleted �tpl .506 Parking spaces tvk� W Y. 45 min. between service 6. Handicapped parking Tp•I 7. Vehicle & pedestrian Circulation 8. Grading permit 9. Grading Plans q,t� `,610. Haul operations � 11. Erosion Control Program 12. Runoff control 13. Slope erosion control 14. Landscape plan bl �r-W Ls rtG`� 15 .i Landscape maintenance Light Spillage & glare O 34'F'Fire suppression �,,K q_ 18. Fire Dept. access /( YI - v\SYY pp,t Pdl9: Vquipment screening �T,R1�{PIR 0 0 £t. height limit nla-�AAt yrnCc- �OS 51 21. rash enclosure screening �1,6,1 22 Sight Distance V Ckr.t&J )4" aL,+S•&JtK> as o-S VL-IS-- Y DEPARTMENT Planning Dept Planning Dept Planning Dept. Planning Dept. Traffic Eng. Traffic Eng. Grading Eng. Grading Eng. Grading $ng. Grading Eng. Grading Eng. Grading Eng. P. B. & R. Subdivision Eng. Planning Dept. Planning Dept. Fire Dept. Fire Dept. Planning Dept. Planning Dept. Planning Dept. Traffic Eng. ACTION Letter of Compliance Plans Approval Plans Approval Letter of Compliance Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval F01 ±c Plans Approval � OP pa 1 Letter of Compliance Letter from Elect.Eng. Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval CONDITION OV. gA23. Sidewalk 24. NO ACTION 25. NO ACTION A' Evening activities restriction p-%'1( 7. Building roofing 28. Facility use information Wpb 429. Ingress/egress headlight .30. Sound attenuation ` fP I- 0 DEPARTMENT Public Works Planning Dept Planning Dept Planning Dept Planning Dept Planning Dept ACTION Plans Approval Letter of Compliance Plans Approval Future submittal Plans Approval Acoustical report tJl�a. he J�n.cQ �ricr �l , COMMISSIONERS n u • - _ - - MINUTES y 0 In 0 0 01 �� a 9 v,� CITY OF NEWPORT ®EACH January 7, 1988 ROLL CALL INDEX 24. That the operator of this restaurant shall submit to the Planning Department on every anniversary, date of the subject Planning Commission meeting a; • declaration under penalty of perjury that the operation of the restaurant has not changed substantially in terms of what is being served. The Planning Commission recessed at 8:45 p.m, and reconvened at 8.53 p.m. ' I *xx A. Traffic Study (Public Hearing) Item No.5 Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the TS construction of a 1,500 seat sanctuary and fellowship hall with related off-street parking or the Mariner's UP1726(A) Church property, located in Area 1 of the North Ford Planned Community. The proposal also includes a review Approved of a revised site plan which includes changes to the previously approved on -site circulation and access to the project from Bison Avenue; and the acceptance of an environmental document. AND B. Use Permit No. 1726 (Amended) (Public Hearing) A request from staff to amend the previously approved Use Permit No. 1726 which allows the construction of a church sanctuary, related church facilities, an elemen- tary school and extended day care facilities, an elementary school and extended day care facilities on the site, be further amended to address the need for additional off-street parking through the use of on -site compact parking spaces, and off -site parking on adjoin-' ing or nearby sites. LOCATION: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 41-27 (Resub-' division No. 328), located at 1000 Bison Avenue, on the northeasterly corner of Bison Avenue and Jamboree Road in North Ford. ZONE: P-C �• APPLICANT Mariner's Church, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant - -18- COMMISSIONERS 0 0 MINUTES O A� ���gOlDd�� yp��1�'e�9y'yo9� 10\01 �`�yCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 9 January 7, 1988 RO :?' CALL INDEX William Laycock, Current Planning Manager, reviewed the application. He stated that a Parking Demand Study was requested with the Traffic Study inasmuch as parking ' problems may exist in the future as the church atten- dance increases. He explained that staff recommended that the applicants provide an Off -site Parking Agree- ment for additional parking spaces on the adjoining Toyota Motor Company property; however,. he said that the applicants were only able to arrange an informal parking arrangement with Toyota Motor Company as currently exists between the two parties. Mr. Laycock requested that Condition No. 3, and Findings No. 5, No. 6, and No. 7 of Exhibit "A" be deleted inasmuch as they are in reference to an Off -site Parking Agreement. He explained that if there is a parking problem in the future that Condition No. 24 states that the Planning Commission may bring back the Use Permit for review. Mr. Laycock stated that 506 parking spaces are proposed on -site for a sanctuary of 1,500 seats. He explained that the parking would be in excess of 1 parking space for 3 seats which is more parking than the Zoning Code currently requires. ' In response to a question posed by Chairman PersBn regarding City's policy if the applicants lost their informal parking agreement with Toyota Motor Company, Mr. Laycock replied that staff would recommend that Mariner's Church provide additional church services and a longer time period between church services. Mr. Laycock stated that staff would not recommend that a portion of the sanctuary be closed. He commented that inasmuch as Mariner's Church is located in a commercial area, there would be other opportunities to administer a parking agreement on another commercial site. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. Brian Norkaitis, 1807 ?ort Tiffan, appeared before the Planning Commission: Lk. Norkaitis stated that the applicants concur with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A". Ms. Anne_Young, 128 Hartford Drive, appeared before the Planning Commission. Ms. Young opposed -the application because the area has congestion, and parking problems. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Debay regarding the parking problems in the area, Ms. Young replied that the Bayridge Condominium Tract does not have sufficient parking spaces for the visitors to park their automobiles. -19- _ COMMISSIONERS ' o 0 �yPa, y<` 'rf'9y CITY OF NEWPORT n L� MINUTES January 7, 1988 3 L` CALL INDEX In response to questions posed by Commissioner Pomeroy, Ms. Young stated that the church members are parking their automobiles on Bison Avenue on Sunday mornings. ' Mr. Laycock replied that 'the automobiles are permitted to be parked on the street only on Sundays. Ms. Young stated that the proposed access road would be across Bison Avenue from the Bayridge -gated entrance, that there would be noise from the school, and the residents would be viewing church rooftops. Mr. Laycock replied that the school currently located on the site was approved by the Planning Commission in April, 1987. Ms. Therese Lewis, 248 Hartford Drive, appeared before the Planning Commission stating her opposition to the application for the following reasons: that the traffic noise from Bison Avenue prohibits her from opening her windows; that the social events from the church are noisy; and that the church members park on Bison Avenue. In response to a question posed by Chairman Pers6n, Ms. Lewis stated that she was not aware that the Planning Commission had approved a larger sanctuary in 1974 than what is currently being proposed. Ms. Lewis pointed out that the environmental study states that the project will produce noise, glare, and obstruction of view. She - commented that the residents' peace of mind and comfort will also'be affected. Ms. Lewis requested that a new environmental study be conducted that would include the residential areas, at.d the proposed shopping center. In response to a question posed by Chairman Pers6n, Ms. Lewis replied that the noise disturbances have come from church social functions, and the church members meeting outside of the church on Sunday mornings. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Koppel- mah, Ms. Lewis replied that the time of the noise has been between 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., a few parties later in the evening, and the noise has been coming from inside the buildings. Commissioner Debay pointed out that the staff report refers to the Bayridge condominium tract, that the General Plan permits "Administrative, Professional, Financial, Commercial", and "General Industrial" uses in the area, and she commented that a church would have a lessor impact to the neighborhood than those uses. Commissioner Pomeroy 'stated that the proposed expansion has been reduced from what the Planning Commission ti _ -20- COMMISSIONERS 0 MINUTES January 7, 1988 ROLL- CALL INDEX approved in 1974. Ms. Lewis maintained that the proposed project would be an impact on the area. Mr. Jim Chronister, 47 Hartford Drive, appeared before the Planning Commission to state his concerns regarding the proposed expansion. He commented that his con- dominium faces Bison Avenue .and that the proposed buildings may block his view; that automobile lights ' would be shining into his home; that the sun reflection from the church roofs would shine in his windows; and the installation of additional parking lot lights. Chairman Pers6n stated that Condition No. 16 refers to the requirements of the light system. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Merrill, Mr. Chronister replied that, his unit does not have a garage in front that would create a noise and light buffer to Bison Avenue. Mr. Chronister explained that he does not object to the current lights; however, tie said that his concern is regarding the proposed driveway lights of automobiles in the proposed driveway. (• In response to questions posed by Commissioner Merrill, Mr. Webb replied that the proposed driveway has in- gress/egress. He explained the proposed grading of the driveway, and he said that the lights would shine across Bison Avenue but that he did not think that they would not elevate up to the Bayridge condominiums. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Debay, Mr. Chronister replied that if the proposed structures are built to a 50 foot height, he would lose 40 to 50 percent of his view. He commented that he has also heard noise from church events, which he has reported to the Police Department. ? In response to a question posed by Commissioner Debay, Mr. Webb explained that the grading of the church site is down 10 feet to 20 feet from Bison Avenue. Mr. Sid Sofer, 900 Arbor Street, Costa Mesa, appeared before the Planning Commission. ' Mr. Sofer suggested that Mariner's Church could administer a -traffic plan that would transport church members. He further sug- gested that based on an average family of four members, the parking spaces be based on 1 parking space for each 4 seats. ii j Ms. Lewis reappeared before the Planning Commission. i Ms. Lewis stated that the expansion could block her mountain view, Chairman Pers6n explained that the I -21" ._-_ COMMISSIONERS • 9 MINUTES �y a 0 a� d��N 9'O•o9 G�F� 9 0 �iNtV121!P\\ y oCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH January 7, 1988 0 CALL INDEX Planning Commission does not protect private views;, however, the Planning Commission attempts to condition projects so that they will aesthetically enhance the area. Ms. Lewis stated 'her concerns regarding the increase in school traffic, and she suggested that the access road be moved so as to ingress/egress to Camel - back Street instead of Bison Avenue. Mr. Webb explained why Camelback Street and Jamboree Road could not be connected to the access road instead of Bison Avenue. He further explained that Bison Avenue is a six lane arterial highway on the Master Plan that has been designed to carry upi to 40,000 automobiles a day, compared to the 5,000 automobiles that are currently travelling on Bison Avenue. In response to Ms. Lewis' concerns regarding the environmental document's statements relating to noise, Mr. Webb advised that the environmental documents for the Bayridge tract required the condominiums to be sound attenuated to mitigate noise from Bison Avenue, and that if the residents are having a noise problem with their windows closed, not open, that they should contact the developer. Mr. Norkaitis reappeared before the Planning Commission. • In response to questions posed by Commissioner Koppel - man', he replied that because 'the church is air condi- tioned, the windows and doors could be closed during indoor church activities. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Pomeroy, Mr. Norkaitis replied that the applicants would agree to a condition stating that the roofing material consist of a non -glare material. Commissioner Pomeroy inquired if the applicants would agree to a condition that would require the development of a traffic management program that' would mitigate . traffic congestion on Sundays? Mr. Norkaitis replied that the applicants have agreed to conditions that require additional time between church services, and an additional driveway. ; Commissioner Winburn and Mr. Laycock discussed the condition that was previously imposed on St. Andrews Church requesting that the conditions in the use permit be reviewed periodically so as to reexamine the church parking and how the parking affects the adjacent residential area. vos,vcrvu�JlUNkKS -•- - -- - --- -- • MINUTES CALL Motion January 7, 1988 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH In response to questions posed by Commissioner Winburn Mr. Norkaitis confirmed that evening activities will no expand beyond 8:30 p.m, on Sunday, Wednesday until 9:0 P.m., and Thursday until-9:30 p.m There being no others desiring to appear and be heard the public hearing was closed at this time. Motion was made to approve the Traffic Study and Use Permit No. 1726 (Amended) subject to the findings ane conditions. in Exhibit °A" including the modifications: Delete Findings No. 5, No. 6, Nfollowing 7, and Condition No. 3;-add Condition No. 26 stating that all evening activities shall be conducted in buildings with the windows and doors closed; add Condition No. 27 stating that the buildings shall be constructed with a non -glare roofing material; add Condition No. 28 stating that the applicant shall provide information to the Planning Department regarding the use of the facilities in the event that a Traffic Management Program needs to Le implemented six months after completion of the facility. Commissioner Pomeroy requested an amendment to the motion that would include Condition No. 29 which would state • that the ingress/egress to Bison Avenue be constructed in a manner that would not allow automobile headlights to strike the residential windows in the Bayridge tract on the southerly side of Bison Avenue. The maker of the motion agreed t- the added condition. The maker of the motion added Condition No. 30 stating that the buildings be sound attenuated to 55 dBA at the property lines. The public hearing was reopened at this time. Mr. Norkitias reappeared before the Planning Commission. He stated that the applicants concur with the aforemen- tioned added conditions to the use permit with the exception of Condition No. 26 regarding noise abatement. He explained that the church has social functions outdoors during the summer months, and he requested that the Planning Commission take this under consideration. The public hearing was closed at this time. Commissioner Pomeroy amended aforementioned Condition No. 26 which would permit outdoor activities June 15 through September 15 until 9:30 p.m. The maker of the motion concurred with the amended condition. INDEX COMMISSIONERS MINUTES .fp A A �¢arO� yd0 0 0 0 9 9 Gc^ �p9rF2.t CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH January 7, 1988 ROLL INDEX Motion was voted on to approve the Traffic Study and Use Permit No. 1726 (Amended) subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A" including the aforementioned deletions and additions to the Use Permit. MOTION All Ayes CARRIED. A. Environmental Document: Accept the environmental' document, making the,following findings: 1. That an•Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and Council Policy K-3. 2. That the contents of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project. 3. The project will not have any significant environ- mental impact. B. Traffic Studv: Approve the Traffic Study, making :j the findings listed below: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and Council Policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project - generated traffic will not be greater than one percent on any leg of any of the critical intersec- tions. "�.. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project - generated traffic will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any 'major'., 'primary -modified', or 'primary' street. C. Use Permit No. 1726 (Amended) Findings: 1. The project will comply with all applicable City and State Building Codes and Zoning requirements for new building applicable to the district in ( which the proposed project is located. -24- _ COMMISSIONERS 0 ym 0.0 Fy Fy AA9 0 9 G c� Np 9i t^ 9y9o� CITY OF NEWfPORT BEACH MINUTES January 7, 1988 ROLL CALL INDEX 2. That the proposed development is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 3. That adequate off-street parking and related vehicular circulation are being provided in conjunction with the proposed development. 4. The proposed number of compact car spaces con- stitutes 25 percent of the parking requirement which is within limits generally accepted by the Planning Commission relative to previous similar applications. 5. Deleted. 6. Deleted. 7. Deleted. 8. The approval of Use Permit No. 1726 (Amended) will l not, under the circumstances of this case, be f\ detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental, or injurious to property and improvements in the; neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and further that the proposed modification to allow the use of compact parking spaces is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of this Code. Conditions: 1. That all previous applicable conditions of approval of Use Permit No 1726 as approved on June 6, 1974 and amended on April 9, 1987, shall be fulfilled. 2. That the proposed development shall be in substan- tial conformance with the approved site plan, floor plans, elevations and sections, except as noted below, 3. Deleted. 4. That a minimum of 506 off-street parking spaces shall be provided on site. ( 5. That at least 45 minutes shall be provided between \, the first and second service on Sunday mornings. 4--_ -25- . COMMISSIONERS 11 MINUTES O A% 9NP A9 9� Gt^ p$rn2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH January 7, 1988 $01.i.� CALL INDEX 6. That the required number of handicapped parking spaces shall be designated solely for handicapped self parking and. shall be identified in a manner acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer. Said parking spaces shall be accessible to the hand- icapped at all times. One handicapped sign on a post shall be required for each handicapped parking space. 7. That the on -site vehicular and pedestrian circula- tion systems shall be subject to further review and approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 8. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit to, be approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 9. That a grading plan shall include a complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities, to minimize any potential -impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants. 10. The grading permit shall include, if required, a description of haul routes, access points to the site, watering, and sweeping program designed to minimize impact of haul operations. 11. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan, if re- quired, shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department and a copy shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 12. The velocity of concentrated runoff from the project shall be evaluated and erosive velocities controlled as part of the project design. 13. That erosion .control •measures deemed necessary shall be done on any exposed slopes within thirty days after grading or as approved by the Grading Engineer. 14. That a landscape and' irrigation plan for. the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accor- dance with the prepared plan.) __ -26- COMMISSIONERS O O i stiv;kro 0\011 � 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 7, 1988 0QL CALL • INDEX 15. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 16. That the light system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and ,to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent properties,. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed electrical engineer; with a letter from the engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met, a 17. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall review the proposed plans and may require an automatic fire suppression/sprinkler protection. 18. That the Fire Department access shall be approved by the Fire Department. 19. That any roof top or other mechanical equipment and emergency power generators shall be screened from view. • 20. Any construction on' the site shall be done ;in accordance with the height restriction of said area (i.e. 50 feet) and shall apply to any landscape materials, signs, flags, etc., as well as struc- tures. 21. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties and streets. 22. That .the entrance for the new driveway on Bison Avenut' shall be designed to provide sight distance in accordance with City Standard 110-L and that any street trees, shrubs, and landscaping shall .be removed or trimmed as necessary to meet this requirement. 23. That a sidewalk connection shall be provided from Bison Avenue to the new facility in the vicinity of the new driveway entrance. 24. That the Planning Commission may add to or modify conditions of approval to this use permit, or 1 recommend to the City Council the revocation of \, this use permit", upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this use permit causes injury, or. is detrimental to the health, V -27- -_ j. COMMISSIONERS y O Atn �t"�gONO�d -"\04 MINUTES January 7, 1988 0 �' CALLINDEX safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the community. 25. This use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.80.090 A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 26. That all evening activities shall be contained within buildings with the windows and the doors ' closed, with the exception of the period between June 15•through September 15 until 9:30 p.m: 27. That the buildings shall be constructed with a non - glare roofing material. 28. That the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department information regarding use of the facilities in the event that a Traffic Management Program needs to be implemented six months after completion of the facility. t. 29. That ingress/egress to Bison Avenue shall be constructed in such a manner that would not allow automobile headlights to strike adjacent residen- tial windows in the'residential tract southerij of Bison Avenue. 30. That the buildings shall be sound attenuated in such a manner as to achieve a maximum sound level of 55 dBA at,the property lines. Use Permit No. 1527 (Amended) (Public Hearing) Item No.6 Request to amend a previously approved use permit which UP1527(A) permitted the expansion of the existing Edwards Theatre complex located in Newport 'Center, so as to add two Approved additional theaters with a total of 600 additional seats. Said approval also included: the approval of.a new off -site parking agreement so as to provide a portion of the required off-street parking spaces in the Design Plaza parking area; the approval of an amended off -site parking agreement for the existing parking area located at the rear of the theater; and the approval of a modification to the zoning Code so as to allow the use of compact parking spaces. The proposed amendment involves a request to consider a new off -site parking area across the street in Fashion Island, in place of the previously approved parking in Design Plaza. The -28- 4 Plan Check No. 47 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING CORRECTIONS �iLL Lac.T/2�GL By;ems, Associate Planner Telephone (714) 644-3200 Date: Address: AU21���0 Corrections Required: Legal Description: Lot Block Section Tract_ Resubdivision required to combine lots or portions of lots when construction or alterations are in excess of $5,000. Lot Size Zone Proposed Use Required Setbacks: Front("Bl�t) Rear Right Side Left Side Structural Area: Buildable Area Permitted Area Proposed Area 4 ,579- 1 3 _75 f Provide tissue overlay of calculations to verify provided square footage. Required Parking 6,11 Proposed parking (Indicate number of stalls provided) Total On -Site Parking t5bG Standard i3,!25; Compact /6277 (RJAI-X.tdl. c Ap) In -lieu Parking Dimension building height as measured from natural grade to average and maximum roof height �MO. Show natural ral grade line on all elevations Show all rooftop mechanical equipment and dimension from grade directly below. Indicate location of trash containers on site plan. Number of stories Floor Plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences, etc. in relation to the property line. µ Fair Share Contribution `p:E�Z 7il ,&61 �� :" 4_ C4Ufii/G• San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee (OVER) 0 SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH: Modifications Committee 6_11 9 Planning Commission:4,AA��0�D Use Permit Variance Resubdivision - Tract Site Plan Review Amendment Other - Public Works: Easement/Encroachment Permit Curb Cut Subdivision Engineer �c Traffic Engineer Approval of Landscape Plans 1-'- S & Building Department: Grading Engineer(fi�a T//%ZE. �S�i_5 To 204 v5 ? !,� NOT c/ylolis i7lA4 z- r,$ Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans Coastal Development Permits: J4c Approval in Concept —M— (Note: File 3 sets of plans: plot plan, floor plan, elevations). Coastal Development Permit No. Waiver/Exemption NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200. Plan Check N (� Axarloa�uM k Fzll��st.y: a%ll COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING CORRECTION jsmet CiMlud By: -- *�, m&,t Associate Planner Telephone (714) 644-3200 Date: g'Z8 I$ �Zr��y Address: l 00 O me Corrections Required: Legal Description: Lot Block Section Tract i Resubdivision required to combine lots or portions of lots when construction or alterations are in excess of $5,000. Lot Size Zone PC Proposed Use C.fy-'-6 I Required Setbacks: Front 0 Rear Right Side Left Side Structural Area: i i Buildable Area Permitted Area Proposed Area Provide tissue overlay of calculations to verify provided square footage. i Required Parking SC4 f q Ct lousy{" �'m WN7 }� Proposed parking (Indicate number of stalls provided) Total On -Site Parking Standard Compact in -lieu Parking Dimension building height as measured from natural grade to average and maximum roof height Show natural grade line on all elevations Show all rooftop mechanical equipment and dimension from grade directly below. Indicate location of trash containers on site plan. Number of stories Floor Plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences, etc. in relation to the property line. Fair Share Contribution Pair A gYaCQk14 4 i San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee #1 36 et✓ s k. (OVER) SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH: Modifications Committee Planning Commission: Use Permit awe.n&J Variance i Resubdivision - Tract Site Plan Review Amendment Other - Public Works: Easement/Encroachment Permit Curb Cut Subdivision Engineer Traffic Engineer Approval of Landscape Plans Building Department: Grading Engineer Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans fir%- °C"nfO t Coastal Development Permits: Approval in Concept (Note: File 3 sets of plans: plot plan, floor plan, elevations). Coastal Development Permit No. Waiver/Exemption NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Use Permit No. 1726 Amended 1-7-88 1000 Bison Avenue PC #1772-88 and PC 1773-88 Quo 1403A-s8 allo laeiAMINq wga.t. _' -,--- - --- --- --- — - — CONDITION DEPARTMENT ACTION 1. Fulfill previous conditions Planning Dept. Letter of Compliance cyr 2. Substantial Conformance Planning Dept. Plans Approval 3. Deleted ` 4. 506 Parking spaces Planning Dept. Plans Approval °5. 45 min. between service I Planning Dept. Letter of Compliance %6. Handicapped parking Traffic Eng. Plans Approval �b7. Vehicle & pedestrian Circulation Traffic Eng. Plans Approval z Or 8. Grading permit Grading Eng. Plans Approval oc 9. Grading Plans Grading Eng. Plans Approval t 10. Haul operations Grading Eng. Plans Approval 2 11. Erosion Control Program Grading Eng. Plans Approval d y.✓d 12. Runoff control Grading Eng. Plans Approval oh 13. Slope erosion control Grading Eng. Plans Approval 14. Landscape plan P. B. & R. Plans Approval Subdivision Eng. Plans Approval 15. Landscape maintenance Planning Dept. Letter of Compliance 1 . Light Spillage & glare Planning Dept. Letter from Elect,Eng. 1 17. Fire suppression Fire Dept. Plans Approval Ab 18. Fire Dept. access Fire Dept. Plans Approval oAk19. Equipment screening Planning Dept. Plans Approval , °J20. 50 ft. height limit Planning Dept. Plans Approval 0$21. Trash enclosure screening Planning Dept. Plans Approval g-�%22. Sight Distance Traffic Eng. Plans Approval 4 0 CONDITION 4*23. Sidewalk 24. NO ACTION 25. NO ACTION 26. Evening activities restriction °�27. Building roofing 28. Facility use information 29. Ingress/egress headlight 30. Sound attenuation DEPARTMENT Public Works Planning Dept. Planning Dept. Planning Dept. Planning Dept. Planning Dept. ACTION Plans Approval Letter of Compliance Plans Approval Future submittal Plans Approval Acoustical report CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Use Permit No. 1726 Amended 1-7-88 1000 Bison Avenue PC #1772-88 and PC 1773-88 yrc MOBA-89 aao aerAININq wau CONDITION DEPARTMENT ACTION 1. Fulfill previous conditions Planning Dept. Letter of Compliance 2. Substantial Conformance Planning Dept. Plans Approval 3. Deleted 4. 506 Parking spaces Planning Dept. Plans Approval 5. 45 min. between service Planning Dept. Letter of Compliance 6. Handicapped parking Traffic Eng. Plans Approval 7. Vehicle & pedestrian Circulation Traffic Eng. Plans Approval 8. Grading permit Grading Eng, Plans Approval 9. Grading Plans Grading Eng. Plans Approval 10. Haul operations Grading Eng. Plans Approval 11. Erosion Control Program Grading Eng. Plans Approval 12. Runoff control Grading Eng. Plans Approval 13. Slope erosion control Grading Eng. Plans Approval 14. Landscape plan P. B. & R. Plans Approval Subdivision Eng. Plans Approval 15. Landscape maintenance Planning Dept. Letter of Compliance 16. Light Spillagl\1& glare Planning Dept. Letter from Elect.Eng. 17. Fire suppressibl Fire Dept. Plans Approval 18. Fire Dept. access Fire Dept. Plans Approval 19. Equipment screening Planning Dept. Plans Approval 20. 50 ft. height limit Planning Dept. Plans Approval 21. Trash enclosure screening Planning Dept. Plans Approval 22. Sight Distance Traffic Eng. Plans Approval a 0 CONDITION 23. Sidewalk 24. NO ACT 25. -NO ACI 26. Evenir 27. Buildi 28. Facili 29. Ingres 30. Sound DEPARTMENT Public Works ACTION Plans Approval ..., 111� .... S, o� "Flu at�"t 'r 7—A MEMORANDUM LDATE ---I&-0 18 TO 0 FROM U 'n 0 REGARDING A41W7' 11-AN q,9 ors 4440 -rAX9* 000- guarION C? 4.500.00 P T ANf?! P*CMATION Avrr-r::e� C roO�� F$WMve /I= TAX) OR r 05 � ot4Agie r -rcrAt t:W0tjjj.,a9* NEW G.U.P. nt-ING C AP96'X. 46e;,t Icy 4n4t460`90 coo. CXD cA4L g. pM57 AC,Otjoll N G . . . ...... ......... . 4 463ITellerAvenug, suite 100 Newport Beach, Colif"Mi"Lqzd60,.("4, GPo 0'ri"., Plan Check No. —I (0 013 A, - t� COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING CORRECTIONS .iRutEn. GAA CiA By:-Wiraey-Wti-144-ams, Associate Planner Telephone (714) 644-3200 Date: 11�IS( Ss) Address: J000 6tl .bw �cve Corrections Required: Legal Description: Lot Block Section Tract Resubdivision required to combine lots or portions of lots when construction or alterations are in excess of $5,000. 1. Lot Size PG Zone Proposed Use ch(wc k Required Setbacks: Front (jtsonl 30! Corw_ OuT q!MFWS(on/ Rear Right Side Left Side Structural Area: Buildable Area Permitted Area Proposed Area Provide tissue overlay of calculations to verify provided square footage. �k :kiA Required Parking crn Proposed parking (Indicate number of stalls provided) Total On -Site Parking Standard Compact In -lieu Parking Dimension,building height as measured from natural grade to average and maximum roof height Show natural grade line on all elevations Show all rooftop mechanical equipment and dimension from grade directly below. Indicate location of trash containers on site plan. w Number of stories Floor Plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences, etc. in relation to the property line. �d Fair Share Contribution ?ets!owr 'TyL4epetc. �r.�G )'Ef�MtNq�lus�1 4b'Ve rolls-6W ck cgradik, 1 e1& s i+ fcsua cz San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee 6e, CC(G.kd a+- ua„c.e. (0� i SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH: Modifications Committee Planning Commission: cif Use Permit) variance Resubdivision - Tract Site Plan Review Amendment Other - Public Works: Easement/Encroachment Permit Curb Cut Subdivision Engineer Traffic Engineer Approval of Landscape Plans Building Department: Grading Engineer a Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans Coastal Development Permits: Approval in Concept (Note: File 3 sets of plans: plot plan, floor plan, elevations). Coastal Development Permit No. Waiver/Exemption NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Use Permit No. 1726 Amended 1-7-88 1000 Bison Avenue PC #1772-88 and PC 1773-88 qrc 1403A-88 allo "TA"(wk w4" C�ft�cw ctir� ts�r�ki k(�rn 5 w�'PA CONDITION DEPARTMENT ACTION 1. Fulfill previous conditions Planning Dept. Letter of Compliance 2 Substantial Conformance Planning Dept. Plans Approval 3. Deleted 4. 506 Parking spaces Planning Dept. Plans Approval 5. 45 min. between service Planning Dept. Letter of Compliance 6. Handicapped parking Traffic Eng. Plans Approval 7. Vehicle & pedestrian Circulation Traffic Eng. Plans Approval ® Grading permit Grading Eng. Plans Approval a' Grading Plans Grading Eng. Plans Approval 4J 1 Haul operations Grading Eng. Plans Approval °P 1 ..Erosion Control Program Grading Eng. Plans Approval 40- Runoff control Grading Eng. Plans Approval AP. Slope erosion control Grading Eng. Plans Approval 14. Landscape plan P. B. & R. Plans Approval Subdivision Eng. Plans Approval 15. Landscape maintenance Planning Dept. Letter of Compliance 16. Light Spillage & glue Planning Dept. Letter from Elect.Eng. 17. Fire suppression Fire Dept. Plans Approval 18. Fire Dept. access Fire Dept. Plans Approval 19. Equipment screening Planning Dept. Plans Approval 20. 50 ft. height limit Planning Dept. Plans Approval 21. Trash enclosure screening Planning Dept. Plans Approval 22. Sight Distance Traffic Eng. Plans Approval • CONDITION DEPARTMENT Sidewalk Public Works 24. NO ACTION 25. NO ACTION 2fi. Evening activities restriction 27. Building roofing 28. Facility use information 29. Ingress/egress headlight 30. Sound attenuation ACTION Plans Approval Planning Dept. Letter of Compliance Planning Dept. Plans Approval Planning Dept. Future submittal Planning Dept. Plans Approval Planning Dept. Acoustical report COMMISSIONERS . MINUTES ti o AF�F�o��G January 7, 1988 �y 9N9;0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH _ y ROLL CALL INDEX 24. That the operator of this restaurant shall submit to the Planning Department on every anniversary date of the subject Planning Commission meeting a declaration under penalty of perjury that the operation of the restaurant has not changed substantially in terms of what is being served. The Planning Commission recessed at 8:45 p.m. and reconvened at 8:53 p.m. A. Traffic Study (Public Hearing) Item No.S Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the TS construction of a 1,500 seat sanctuary and fellowship hall with related off-street parking on the Mariner's UP1726(A) Church property, located in Area 1 of the North Ford Planned Community. The proposal also includes a review Approved of a revised site plan which includes changes to the [ previously approved on -site circulation and access to the project from Bison Avenue; and the acceptance of an environmental document. AND B. Use Permit No. 1726 (Amended) (Public Hearing) A request from staff to amend the previously approved Use Permit No. 1726 which allows the construction of a church sanctuary, related church facilities, an elemen- tary school and extended day care facilities, an elementary school and extended day care facilities on the site, be further amended to address the need for additional off-street parking through the use of on -site compact parking spaces, and off -site parking on adjoin-' ing or nearby sites. LOCATION: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 41-27 (Resub- division No. 328), located at 1000 Bison Avehue, on the northeasterly corner of Bison Avenue and Jamboree Road in North Ford. ZONE: P-C APPLICANT Mariner's Church, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant '" -18- _ COMMISSIONERS ydG?��iN�99'�A 9�m9.0 • MINUTES January 7, 1988 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLLCALL INDEX William Laycock, Current Planning -Manager, reviewed the application. He stated that a Parking Demand Study was requested with the Traffic Study inasmuch as parking problems may exist in the future as the church atten- dance increases. He explained that staff recommended that the applicants provide an Off -site Parking Agree- ment for additional parking spaces on the adjoining Toyota Motor Company property; however, he said that the applicants were only able to arrange an informal parking arrangement with Toyota Motor Company as currently exists between the two parties. Mr. Laycock requested that Condition No. 3, and Findings No. 5, No. 6, and No. 7 of Exhibit "A" be deleted inasmuch as they are in reference to an Off -site Parking Agreement. He explained that if there is a parking problem in the future that .Condition No. 24 states that the Planning Commission may bring back the Use Permit for review. Mr. Laycock stated that 506 parking spaces are proposed on -site for a sanctuary of 1,500 seats. He explained that the parking would be in excess of 1 parking space for 3 seats which is more parking than the Zoning Code currently requires. ' In response to a question posed by Chairman Pers6n regarding City's policy if the applicants lost their informal parking agreement with Toyota Motor Company, Mr. Laycock replied that staff would recommend that Mariner's Church provide additional church services and a longer time period between church services. Mr. Laycock stated that staff would not recommend that a portion of the sanctuary be closed. He commented that inasmuch as Mariner's Church is located in a commercial area, there would be other opportunities to administer a parking agreement on another commercial site. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. Brian Norkaitis, 1807 Port Tiffan, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Norkaitis stated that the applicants concur with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A". Ms. Anne Young, 128 Hartford Drive, appeared before -the Planning Commission. Ms. Young opposed -the application because the area has congestion, and parking problems. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Debay regarding the parking problems in the area, Ms. Young replied that the Bayridge Condominium Tract does not have sufficient parking spaces for the visitors to park their automobiles. -19 _ COMMISSIONERS E MINUTES yd 3� �iN�l� pAA 9 �9 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH January 7, 1988 ROLE CALL INDEX In response to questions posed by Commissioner Pomeroy, Ms. Young stated that the church members are parking their automobiles on Bison Avenue on Sunday mornings. Mr: Laycock replied that 'the automobiles are permitted to be parked on the street only on Sundays. Ms. Young stated that the proposed access road would be across Bison Avenue from the Bayridge gated entrance, that there would be noise from the school, and the residents would be viewing church rooftops. Mr. Laycock replied that the school currently located on the site was approved by the Planning Commission in April, 1987. Ms. Therese Lewis, 248 Hartford Drive, appeared before the Planning Commission stating her opposition to the application for the following reasons: that the traffic noise from Bison Avenue prohibits her from opening her windows; that the social events from the church are noisy; and that the church members park on Bison Avenue. In response to a question posed by Chairman Pers6n, Ms. Lewis stated that she was not aware that the Planning Commission had approved a larger sanctuary in 1974 than what is currently being proposed., Ms. Lewis pointed out that the environmental study states that the project will produce noise, glare, and obstruction of view. She commented that the residents' peace 'of mind and comfort ; will also'be affected. Ms. Lewis requested that a new environmental study be conducted that would include the residential areas, and the proposed shopping center. In .response to a question posed by Chairman Pers6n, Ms. Lewis replied that the noise disturbances have come from church social functions, and the church members meeting r)utside of the church on Sunday mornings. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Koppel - man, Ms. Lewis replied that the time of the noise has been between 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., a few parties later in the evening, and the noise has been coming from inside the buildings. Commissioner Debay pointed out -that the staff report refers to the Bayridge condominium tract, that the General Plan permits "Administrative, Professional, Financial, Commercial", and "General Industrial" uses in the area, and she commented that a church would have a lessor impact to the neighborhood than those uses. Commissioner Pomeroy stated that the proposed expansion has been reduced from what the Planning Commission _ -20- ' COMMISSIONERS •�A A'%'F C�°� y� °L ``� 0 0A s m9 GycA9 N°yyf � yo �• CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 7, 1988 CALL INDEX approved in ,1974. Ms. Lewis maintained that the proposed project would be an impact on the area. Mr. Jim Chronister, 47 Hartford Drive, appeared before the Planning Commission to state his concerns regarding the proposed expansion. He commented that his con- dominium faces Bison Avenue and that the proposed buildings may block his view; that automobile lights would be shining into his home; that the sun reflection from the church roofs would shine in his windows; and the installation of additional parking lot lights. Chairman Pers6n stated that Condition No. 16 refers to the requirements of the light system. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Merrill, Mr. Chronister replied that, his unit does not have a garage in front that would create a noise and light buffer to Bison Avenue. Mr. Chronister explained that he does not object to the current lights; however, he said that his concern is regarding the proposed driveway lights of automobiles in the proposed driveway. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Merrill, Mr. Webb replied that the proposed driveway has in- gress/egress. He explained the proposed grading of the driveway, and he said that the lights would shine across Bison Avenue but that he did not think that they would not elevate up to the Bayridge condominiums. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Debay, Mr. Chronister replied that if the proposed structures are built to a 50 foot height, he would lose 40 to 50 percent of his view. He commented that he has also heard noise from church events, which he has reported to the Police Department. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Debay, Mr. Webb explained that the grading of the church site is down 10 feet to 20 feet from Bison Avenue. Mr. Sid Sofer, 900 Arbor Street, Costa Mesa, appeared before the Planning Commission. ' Mr. Sofer suggested that Mariner's Church could administer a traffic plan that would transport church members. He further sug- gested that based on an average family of four members, the parking spaces be based on 1 parking space for each 4 seats. Ms. Lewis reappeared before the Planning Commission. Ms. Lewis stated that the expansion could block her mountain view, Chairman Pers6n explained that the _ -21' COMMISSIONERS ei vy 9 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 7, 1988 ROL. CALL INDEX Planning Commission does not protect private views; however, the Planning Commission attempts to condition projects so that they will aesthetically enhance the area. Ms. Lewis stated her concerns regarding the increase in school traffic, and she suggested that the access road be moved so as to ingress/egress to Camel - back Street instead of Bison Avenue. Mr. ,Webb explained why Camelback Street and Jamboree Road could not be connected to the access road instead of Bison Avenue. He further explained that Bison Avenue is a six lane arterial highway on the Master Plan that has been designed to carry up to 40,000 automobiles a day, compared to the 5,000 automobiles that are currently travelling on Bison Avenue. In response to Ms. Lewis' concerns regarding the environmental document's statements relating to noise, Mr. Webb advised that the environmental documents for the Bayridge tract required the condominiums to be sound attenuated to mitigate noise from Bison Avenue, and that if the residents are having a noise problem with their windows closed, not open, that they should contact the developer. Mr. Norkaitis reappeared before the Planning Commission. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Koppel - man, he replied that because 'the church is air condi- tioned, the windows and doors could be closed during indoor church activities. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Pomeroy, Mr. Norkaitis replied that the applicants would agree to a condition stating that the roofing material consist of a non -glare material. Commissioner Pomeroy inquired if the applicants would agree to a condition that would require the development of a traffic management program that' would mitigate . traffic congestion on Sundays? Mr. Norkaitis replied that the applicants have agreed to conditions that require additional time between church services, and an additional driveway. Commissioner Winburn and Mr. Laycock discussed the condition that was previously imposed on St. Andrews' Church requesting that the conditions in the use permit be reviewed periodically so as to reexamine the church parking and how the parking affects the adjacent residential area. '22- _ COMMISSIONERS � A 0 4 .p N��' G0 yd 90,9 AA 9 0 �A0 -6 vy CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 7, 1988 ROL :! CALL INDEX In response to questions posed by Commissioner Winburn, Mr. Norkaitis confirmed that evening activities will not expand beyond 8:30 p.m. on Sunday, Wednesday until 9:00 p.m., and Thursday until 9:30 p.m.. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. Motion x Motion was made to approve the Traffic Study and Use Permit No. 1726 (Amended) subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A" including the following modifications: Delete Findings No. 5, No. 6, No. 7, and Condition No. 3;•add Condition No. 26 stating that all evening activities shall be conducted in buildings with the windows and doors closed; add Condition No. 27 stating that the buildings shall be constructed with a non -glare roofing material.; add Condition No. 28 stating that the applicant shall provide information to the Planning Department regarding the use of the facilities in the event that a Traffic Management Program needs to be implemented six months after completion of the facility. Commissioner Pomeroy requested an amendment to the motion that would include Condition No. 29 which would state• that the ingress/egress to Bison Avenue be constructed in a manner that would not allow automobile headlights to strike the residential windows in the Bayridge tract on the southerly side of Bison Avenue. The maker of the motion agreed to the added condition. The maker of the motion added Condition No. 30 stating that the buildings be sound attenuated to 55 dBA at the property lines. The public hearing was reopened at this time. Mr. Norkitias reappeared before the Planning Commission. He stated that the applicants concur with the aforemen- tioned added conditions to .the use permit with the exception of Condition No. 26 regarding noise abatement. He explained that the church has social functions outdoors during the summer months, and he requested that the Planning Commission take this under consideration. The public hearing was closed at this time. Commissioner Pomeroy amended aforementioned Condition No. 26 which would permit outdoor activities June 15 ( through September 15 until 9:30 p.m. The maker of the motion concurred with the amended 'condition. — _23- All P. COMMISSIONERS • B �A9��� pAO9p�9 Gt�Np�iFyf. CITY OF NE 9y P WORT BEACH MINUTES January 7, 1988 :ALL INDEX Motion was voted on to approve the Traffic Study and Use Permit No. 1726 (Amended) subject to the findings .and conditions in Exhibit "A" including.the aforementioned deletions and additions to the Use Permit. MOTION Lyes CARRIED. A. Environmental Document: Accept the environmental' document, making the following findings: 1. That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and Council Policy K-3. 2. That the contents of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project. 3. The project will not have any significant environ- mental impact. B. Traffic Study: Approve the Traffic Study, making the findings listed below: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation system in Accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and Council Policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study•indicates that the project - generated traffic will not be greater than one ,percent on any leg of any of the critical intersec- tions. 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project - generated traffic will "neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any 'major', 'primary -modified', or 'primary' street. C. Use Permit No. 1726 (Amended) Findings: 1. The project will comply with all applicable City and State Building 'Codes and Zoning requirements for new building applicable to the district in which the proposed project is located. _ -24- COMMISSIONERS fit. A A i• 'F p G� yd i+000 '�AN99 Gt^ p9ic�y�' i SiE. 9y • E CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 7, 1988 OLD CALL INDEX 2. That the proposed development is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and. is compatible with surrounding land uses. 3. That adequate off-street parking and related vehicular circulation are being provided in conjunction with the proposed develoopment. 4. The proposed number of compact car spaces con- stitutes 25 percent of the parking requirement which is within limits generally accepted by the Planning Commission relative to previous similar applications. 5. Deleted. 6. Deleted. 7. Deleted. 8. The approval of Use Permit No. 1726 (Amended) will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental, or injurious to property and improvements in the! neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and further that the proposed modification to allow the use of compact parking spaces is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of this Code. Conditions: 1. That all previous applicable conditions of approval of Use Permit No 1726 as approved on June 6, 1974 and amended on April 9, 1987, shall be fulfilled. 2. That the proposed development shall be in substan-• tial conformance with the approved site plan, floor plans, elevations and sections, except as noted below. 3. Deleted. 4. That a minimum of 506 off-street parking spaces' shall be provided on site. 5. That at least 45 minutes shall be provided between the first and second service on Sunday mornings. ti:-_ -25- COMMISSIONERS y� '�Y �9N�9 AAA 9 m9 Gt^ O9�FyI. • i MINUTES January 7, 1988 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL -CALL INDEX 6. That the required number of handicapped parking spaces shall be designated solely for handicapped self parking and shall be identified in a manner - acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer. Said parking spaces shall be accessible to the hand- icapped at all times. One handicapped sign on a post shall be required for each handicapped parking space. 7. That the on -site vehicular and pedestrian circula- tion systems shall be subject to further review and approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 8. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit to. be approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 9. That a grading plan shall include a complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities, to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants. 10. The grading permit shall include, if required, a description of haul routes, access points to the site, watering, and sweeping program designed to minimize impact of haul .operations. 11. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan, if re- quired, shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department and a copy shall be for -warded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 12. The velocity of concentrated runoff from the project shall be evaluated and erosive velocities controlled as part of the project design. 13. That erosion control 'measures deemed necessary shall be done on any exposed slopes within thirty days after grading or as approved by the Grading Engineer. 14. That a landscape and' irrigation plan for. the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape' architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accor- dance with the prepared plan.) �, _ -26- - COMMISSIONERS MINUTES ;0�'t��OAG'9Fm9 January 7, 1988 G�c��ao9��yO.c CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH r; 2 —4• ROLL CALL INDEX 15. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 16. That the light system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent properties. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed electrical engineer; with a letter from the engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 17. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall review the proposed plans and may require an automatic fire suppression/sprinkler protection. 18. That the Fire Department access shall be approved by the Fire Department. 19. That any roof top or other mechanical equipment and emergency power generators shall be screened from view. 20. Any construction on the site shall be done ;in accordance with the height restriction of said area (i.e. 50 feet) and shall apply to any landscape materials, signs, flags, etc., as well as struc- tures. 21. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties and streets. 22. That the entrance for the new driveway on Bison Avenue shall be designed to provide sight distance in accordance with City Standard 110-L and that any street trees, shrubs, and landscaping shall .be removed or trimmed as necessary to meet this requirement. 23. That a sidewalk 'connection shall be provided from Bison Avenue to the new facility in the vicinity of the new driveway entrance. 24. That the Planning Commission may add to or modify conditions of approval to this use permit, or 1 recommend to the City Council the revocation of 1 this use permit, upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this use permit causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, �,-_ -27- DOMMISSIONERS ti G Ac��t^�A'0 ddd d% ANP'0 9y 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 7, 1988 ROL.c' CALL. INDEX safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the community. 25. This use' permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.80.090 A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. ; 26. That all evening activities shall be contained within buildings with the windows and the doors closed, with the exception of the period between June 15,through September 15 until 9:30 p.m: 27. That the buildings shall be constructed with a non - glare roofing material. 28. That the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department information regarding use of the facilities in the event that a Traffic Management Program needs to be implemented six months after completion of the facility. 29. That ingress/egress to Bison Avenue shall be, constructed in such a manner that would not allow automobile headlights to strike adjacent residen- tial windows in the'residential tract southerlX of Bison Avenue. 30. That the buildings shall be sound attenuated in such a manner as to achieve a maximum sound level of 55 dBA at the property lines. Use Permit No. 1527 (Amended) (Public Hearing) Item No.6 Request to amend a previously approved use permit which UP1527(A) permitted the expansion of the existing Edwards Theatre complex located in Newport Center, so as to add two Approved additional theaters with a total of 600 additional seats. Said approval also included: the approval of.a new off -site parking agreement so as to' provide a portion of the -required off-street parking spaces in the Design Plaza parking area; the approval of an amended off -site parking agreement for the existing parking area located at the rear of the theater; and the approval of a modification to the zoning Code so as to allow the use of compact parking spaces. The proposed amendment involves a request to consider a new off -site parking area across the street in Fashion Island, in place of the previously approved parking in Design Plaza. The -28- i "ItC 6 Qx+� Pian Check No. 1 (90� COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING CORRECTIONS .3Aul-A. GA+'Ltih By: G_I44 -, Associate Planner Telephone (714) 644-3200 Date: III t5f Say Address: C)00 iJlSa.� t(vC i I Corrections Required: Legal Description: Lot Block Section Tract Resubdivision required to combine lots or portions of lots when construction or alterations are in excess of $5,000. '1 - Lot Size Zone PG Proposed Use C'ktrc.k 0_"Ct(4VAA1n Required Setbacks: t � f Front (�,tsonl 3o GW� L Oc�T YJ(MSto� Rear Right Side Left .Side Structural Area: Buildable Area Permitted Area Proposed Area Provide tissue overlay of calculations to verify provided square footage. Required Parking a-K Proposed parking (Indicate number of stalls provided) Total on -Site Parking Standard Compact In -lieu Parking Dimension,building height as measured from natural grade to average and maximum roof height Show natural grade line on all elevations Show all rooftop mechanical equipment and dimension from grade directly below. Indicate location of trash containers on site plan. Number of stories Floor Plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. 1 Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences, etc. in r,'.ation to the property line. -�c Fair Share Contribution 1-�N?Othf�c. �t"'A%Fs� �n7C �MtNq�Wr� -Vn IYDa, toku-Lk4 (LA- 4tadikr acnwl i tssku�,ce 4 San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee �-• (�e CoI(�.c�P a}- hui(r��k; P,eiutit'�' ts6ury„ ci (Ot\ SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH: Modifications Committee Planning Commission: �1E Use Permit -Jf [12 Q awJAA" -i-SSA see a-i�u cG. cP I cam tP� r n� Variance a�pwva i I Resubdivision - Tract Site Plan Review Amendment Other - Public works: Easement/Encroachment Permit Curb Cut ov- Subdivision Engineer Traffic Engineer Approval of Landscape Plans Building Department: 41 Grading Engineer Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans Fib VjeVft v -KeWT'1 Conrli•� o ( Y Coastal Development Permits: Approval in Concept (Note: File 3 sets of plans: .plot plan, floor plan, elevations). Coastal Development Permit No. Waiver/Exemption NOTE: it is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you have questions regarding your application, please contact me i at (714) 644-3200. i 0 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Use Permit No. 1726 Amended 1-7-88 1000 Bison Avenue PC #1772-88 and PC 1773-88 -- �q�c _14D9 N-88—aKo 0.e7Me(wy Wk" -- --- yv. CONDITION DEPARTMENT Z ACTION 1. Fulfill previous conditions Planning Dept. Letter.of Compliance 0z 2 Substantial Conformance Planning Dept. Plans Approval 3. Deleted 4. 506 Parking spaces Planning Dept. Plans Approval 5. 45 min. between service - i Planning Dept. Letter of Compliance 6. Handicapped parking Traffic Eng. Plans Approval 7. Vehicle & pedestrian Circulation Traffic Eng. Plans Approval or-, ® Grading permit Grading Eng. Plans Approval ;! IDGrading Plans Grading Eng. Plans Approval 00 Haul operations Grading Eng. Plans Approval °W 1 .'Erosion Control Program Grading Eng. Plans Approval Runoff control Grading Eng. Plans Approval Slope erosion control Grading Eng. Plans Approval 14. Landscape plan P. B. & R. Plans Approval Subdivision Eng. Plans Approval 15. Landscape'maintenance Planning Dept. Letter of Compliance 16. Light Spillage & gli\re — Planning Dept. Letter fr,\Ta Elect.Eng. 17. Fire suppression I, Fire Dept. Plans Approval 18. Fire Dept. access Fire Dept. Plans Approval 19. Equipment screening Planning Dept. Plans Approval e 20. 50 ft. height limit Planning Dept. Plans Approval 21. Trash enclosure screening Planning Dept. Plans Approval 22. Sight Distance `- Traffic Eng. Plans Approval- 0 CONDITION Sidewalk 24. NO ACTION - 25. NO ACTION 26. Evening activities restriction 27. Building roofing 28. Facility use information 29. Ingress/egress headlight 30. Sound attenuation Jf DEPARTMENT Public Works ACTION Plans Approval Planning Dept. Letter of Compliance Planning Dept. Plans Approval Planning Dept. Future submittal Planning Dept. Plans Approval Planning Dept. Acoustical report COMMISSIONERS �0, PO�d G�y9o,Lpy�ff �o 9y • - -- -- MINUTES January 7, 1988 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL INDEX 24. That the operator of this restaurant shall submit to the Planning Department on every anniversary date of the subject Planning Commission meeting a - declaration under penalty of perjury that the operation of the restaurant has not changed substantially in terms of what is being served. The Planning Commission recessed at 8:45 p.m. and reconvened at 8:53 p.m. A. Traffic Study (Public Hearing) Item No.S Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the TS construction of a 1,500 seat sanctuary and fellowship hall with related off-street park`.ig on the Mariner's UP1726(A) Church property, located in Area 1 of the North Ford Planned Community. The proposal also includes a review Approved of a revised site plan which includes changes to the previously approved on -site circulation and access to \\\ the project from Bison Avenue; and the acceptance of an environmental document. AND B. Use Permit No. 1726 (Amended) (Public 'Hearing) A request from staff to amend the previously approved Use Permit No. 1726 which allows the construction of a church sanctuary, related church facilities, An elemen- tary school and extended day care facilities, an elementary school and extended day care facilities on the site, be further amended to address the need for additional off-street parking through the use of on -site compact parking spaces, and off -site parking on•adjoin-' ing or nearby sites. LOCATION: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 41-27 (Resub- (kvision No. 328), located at 1000 Bison Avenue, on the northeasterly corner of Bison Avenue and Jamboree Road in North Ford. ZONE: P-C APPLICANT Mariner's Church, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant COMMISSIONERS 92 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 7, 1988 ROLLCALL INDEX William Laycock, Current Planning Manager, reviewed the application. He stated that a Parking Demand Study was requested with the Traffic Study inasmuch as parking problems may exist in the future• as the church atten- dance increases. He explained that staff recommended that the applicants provide an Off -site Parking Agree- ment for additional parking spaces. on the adjoining Toyota Motor Company property; however,.he said that the applicants were only able to arrange an informal parking arrangement with Toyota Motor Company as currently exists between the two parties. Mr. Laycock requested that Condition No. 3, and Findings No. 5, No. 6, and No. 7 of Exhibit "A" be deleted inasmuch as they are in reference to an Off -site Parking Agreement. He explained that if there is a parking problem in the future that .Condition No. 24 states that the Planning Commission may bring back the Use Permit for review. Mr. Laycock stated that 506 parking spaces are proposed on -site for a sanctuary of 1,500 seats. He explained that the parking would be in excess of 1 parking space for 3 seats which is more parking than the Zoning Code currently requires. ' In response to a question posed by Chairman Pers6n regarding City's policy if the applicants lost their informal parking agreement with Toyota Motor Company, Mr. Laycock replied that staff would recommend that Mariner's Church provide additional church services and a longer time period between church services.. Mr. Laycock stated that staff would not recommend that a portion of the sanctuary be closed. He commented that inasmuch as Mariner's Church is located in a commercial area, there would be other opportunities to administer a parking agreement on another commercial site. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. Brian Norkaitis, 1807 Porv, Tiffan, appeared before the Planning Commission: Mr.•ilorkaitis stated that the applicants concur with the findings •and conditions in Exhibit "A". Ms. Anne Young, 128 Hartford Drive, appeared before the Planning Commission. Ms. Young opposed'the application because the area has congestion, and parking problems. In . response to a question posed by Commissioner Debay regarding the parking problems in the area, Ms. Young replied that the Bayridge Condominium Tract does not r have sufficient parking spaces for the visitors to park their automobiles. Y -19- COMMISSIONERS 9y . . MINUTES January 7, 1988 CITY CP NEWPORT BEACH CALL INDEX In response to questions posed by Commissioner Pomeroy, Ms. Young stated that the church members are parking their automobiles on Bison Avenue on Sunday, mornings. Mr. Laycock replied that 'the automobiles are permitted to be parked on the street only on Sundays. Ms. Young stated that the proposed access road would be across Bison Avenue from the Bayridge gated entrance, that there would be noise from the school, and the residents would be viewing church rooftops. Mr. Laycock replied that the school currently located on the site was approved by the Planning Commission in April, 1987. Ms. Therese Lewis, 248 Hartford Drive, appeared before the Planning Commission stating her opposition to the application for the following reasons: that the traffic noise from Bison Avenue prohibits her from opening her windows; that the social events from the church are noisy; and that the church members park on Bison Avenue. In response to a question posed by Chairman Pers6n, Ms. Lewis stated that she was not aware that the Planning Commission had approved a larger sanctuary in 1974 than what is currently being proposed. Ms. Lewis pointed out that the environmental study states that the project will produce noise, glare, and obstruction of view. She commented that the residents' peace 'of mind and.comfort will also'be affected. Ms. Lewis requested that a new environmental study be conducted that would include the residential area--, and the proposed shopping center. In response to a question posed by Chairman Pers6n, Ms. Lewis replied that the noise disturbances have come from church social functions, and the church members meeting outside of the church on Sunday mornings. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Koppel - man, Ms. Lewis replied that the time of the noise has been between 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., a few parties later in the evening, and the noise has been coming from inside the buildings. Commissioner Debay pointed out that the staff report refers to the Bayridge condominium tract, that the General Plan permits "Administrative, Professional, Financial, Commercial", and "General Industrial" uses in 'the area, and she commented that a church would have a lessor impact to the neighborhood than those uses. Commissioner Pomeroy stated that the proposed expansion has been reduced from what the Planning Commission . -20- ' ti _ COMMISSIONERS ym°� `m� � °AA 9 .. vy CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 7, 1988 ROLL CALL INDEX approved in 1974. Ms. Lewis maintained that the proposed project would be an impact on the area. Mr. Jim Chronister, 47 Hartford Drive, appeared before the Planning Commission to state his concerns regarding the proposed expansion. He commented that his con- dominium faces Bison Avenue and that the proposed buildings may block his view; that automobile lights would be shining into his home; that the sun reflection from the church roofs would shine in his windows; and the installation of additional parking lot lights. Chairman Persdn stated that Condition No. 16 refers to the requirements of the light system. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Merrill, Mr. Chronister replied that, his unit does not have a' garage in front that would create a noise and light buffer to Bison Avenue. Mr. Chronister explained that he does not object to the current lights; howe.er, he said that his concern is regarding the proposed driveway lights of automobiles in the proposed driveway. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Merrill, Mr. Webb replied that the proposed driveway has in- gress/egress. He explained the proposed grading of the driveway, and he said that the lights would shine across Bison Avenue but that he did not' think that they would not elevate up to the Bayridge condominiums. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Debay, Mr. Chronister replied that if the proposed structures are built to a 50 foot height, he would lose 40 to 50 percent of his view. He commented that he has also heard noise from church events, which he has reported to the Police Department. i ' In response to a question posed by Commissioner Debay, Mr. Webb explained that the grading of the church site is down 10 feet to 20 feet from Bison Avenue. Mr. Sid Sofer, 900 Arbor Street, Costa Mesa, appeared before the Planning Commission. ' Mr. Sofer suggested that Mariner's Church could administer a traffic plan that would transport church members. He further sug- gested that based on an average family of four members, the parking spaces be based on 1 parking space for each 4 seats. lMs. Lewis reappeared before the Planning Commission. Ms. Lewis stated that the expansion could block her mountain view. Chairman Pers6n explained that the -21Z _ COMMISSIONERS MINUTES 0000 9N PP A O iSF\V10\ yy�ro� y �� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH January 7, 1988 ROLE CALL INDEX Planning Commission does not protect private views; however, the Planning Commission attempts to condition projects so that they will aesthetically enhance the area. Ms. Lewis stated 'her concerns regarding the increase in school traffic, and she suggested that the access road be moved so as to ingress/egress to Camel - back Street instead of Bison Avenue. Mr. ,Webb explained why Camelback Street and Jamboree Road could not be connected to the access road instead of Bison Avenue. He further explained that Bison Avenue is a six lane arterial highway on the Master Plan that has been designed to carry up' to 40,000 automobiles a day, compared to the 5,000 automobiles that are currently travelling on Bison Avenue. In response to Ms. Lewis' concerns regarding the environmental document's statements relating to noise, Mr. Webb advised that the environmental documents for' the Bayridge tract required the condominiums to be sound attenuated to mitigate noise from Bison Avenue, and that if the residents are having a noise problem with their windows closed, not open, that they should contact the developer. Mr. Norkaitis reappeared before the Planning Commission. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Koppel - man, he replied that because 'the church is air condi- tioned, the windows and doors could be closed during indoor church activities. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Pomeroy, Mr. Norkaitis replied that the applicants would agree to a condition stating that the roofing material consist of a non -glare material. Commissioner Pomeroy inquired if the applicants w.�uld agree to a condition that would require the development • of a traffic management program that' would mitigate . traffic congestion on Sundays? Mr. Norkaitis replied that the applicants have agreed to conditions that require additional time between church services, and an ' additional driveway. Commissioner Winburn and Mr. Laycock discussed the condition that was previously imposed on St. Andrews' Church requesting that the conditions in the use permit be reviewed periodically so as to reexamine the church parking and how the parking affects the adjacent residential area. -22- fiv+iragoo IVNLKS • \*1\.0 \o\;\FCC\O\ • MINUTES CALL Motion January 7, 1988 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH -- In—response""to questions posed by Commissioner Winburn„ Mr. Norkaitis confirmed that evening activities will not expand beyond 8:30 p.m, on Sunday, Wednesday until 9:00 P.m., and Thursday until 9:30 p.m There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. Motion was made to approve the Traffic Study and Use Permit No. 1726 (Amended) subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A" including the following modifications: Delete Findings No. 5, No. 6, Nf 7, and Condition No. 3;-add Condition No. 26 stating that all evening activities shall be conducted in buildings with the windows and doors closed; add Condition No. 27 stating that the buildings shall be constructed with a non -glare roofing material; add Condition No. 28 stating that the applicant shall provide information to the Planning Department regarding the use of the facilities in the event that a Traffic Management Program needs to be implemented six months after completion of the facility. Commissioner Pomeroy requested an amendment to the motion that would include Condition No. 29 which would state • that the ingress/egress to Bison Avenue be constructed in a manner that would not allow automobile headlights to strike the residential windows in the Bayridge tract on the southerly side of Bison Avenue. The maker of the motion agre d to the added condition. The maker of the motion added Condition No. 30 stating that the buildings be sound attenuated to 55 dBA at the Property lines. The public hearing was reopened at this time. Mr. Norkitias reappeared before the Planning Commission. He stated that the applicants concur with the aforemen- tioned added conditions to the use permit with the exception of Condition No. 26 regarding noise abatement. He explained that the church has social functions outdoors during the summer months, and he requested that the Planning Commission take this under consideration. The public hearing was closed at this time. Commissioner Pomeroy amended aforementioned Condition No. 26 which would permit outdoor activities June 15 through September 15 until 9:30 p.m. The maker of the motion concurred with the amended condition. I ' INDE _ _23- COMMISSIONERS . MINUTES A;�a•Gc^ yG0 000 'DA99 Gt^ v'p �i t�2 f• CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH January 7, 1988 ROLL CALL INDEX Motion was voted on to approve the Traffic Study and Use Permit No. 1726 (Amended) subject to the findings -and conditions in Exhibit "A!' including the aforementioned deletions and additions to the Use Permit. MOTION All Ayes CARRIED. A. Environmental Document: Accept the environmental, document, making the following findings: 1. That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and Council Policy K-3. 2.• That the contents of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project. 3. The project will not have any significant- environ- mental impact. B. Traffic Study: Approve the Traffic Study, making the findings listed below: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and Council Policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project - generated traffic will not be greater than one ,percent on any leg of any of the critical intersec- tions. 3. '7�at the Traffic Study indicates that the project- gJnerated traffic will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any 'major':, 'primary -modified', or 'primary' street. C. Use Permit No. 1726 (Amended) Findings' 1. The project will comply with all applicable City and State Building Codes and Zoning requirements for new building applicable to the district in which the proposed project is located. _ -24- COMMISSIONERS MINUTES ti 0 Ava'�% �F�AONp�m d�9N� N99 Gt^ p9it^2'c 92 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH January 7, 1988 ROIL CALL INDEX 2. That the proposed development is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and .is compatible with surrounding land 'uses. 3. That adequate off-street parking and related vehicular circulation are being provided in conjunction with the proposed development. 4. The 'proposed number of compact car spaces con- stitutes 25 percent of the parking requirement which is within limits generally accepted by the Planning Commission relative to previous similar applications. 5. Deleted. 6. Deleted. 7. Deleted. 8. The approval of Use Permit No. 1726 (Amended) will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental, or injurious to property and improvements in the' neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and further that the proposed modification to allow the use of compact parking spaces is consistent with, the legislative intent of Title 20 of this Code. Conditions: 1. That all previous applicable conditions of approval of Use Permit No 1726 as approved on June 6, 1974 and amended on April 9, 1987, shall be fulfilled. 2. That the proposed development shall be in substan-. tial conformance with the approved site plan, floor plans, elevations and sections, except as noted below. 3. Deleted. 4. That a minimum of 506 off-street parking spaces shall be provided on site. r 5. That at least 45 minutes shall be provided between \, the first and second service on Sunday mornings. .. ; -25- COMMISSIONERS � � MINUTES 0 N CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH January 7, 1988 ,bLLCALL INDEX 6. That the required number of handicapped parking spaces shall be designated solely for handicapped self parking and shall be identified in a manner acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer. Said parking spaces shall be accessible to the hand- icapped at all times. One handicapped sign on a post shall be required for each handicapped parking' space. 7. That the on -site vehicular and pedestrian circula- tion systems shall be subject to further review and approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 8. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit to be approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 9. That a grading plan shall include a complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities, to n.nimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants. 10. The grading permit shall include, if required, a ' description of haul routes, access points to the site, watering, and sweeping program designed to minimize impact of haul operations. 11. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan, if re- quired, shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department and a copy shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 12. The velocity of concentrated runoff from the project shall be evaluated and erosive velocities controlled as part of the project design. 13. That erosion control 'measures deemed necessary shall be done on any exposed slopes within thirty days after grading or as 'approved by the Grading Engineer. 14. That a landscape and' irrigation plan for. the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accor- dance with the prepared plan.) yi ` -26- COMMISSIONERS o A� ym °+L 111 F9 OAA v isl1 /. Py�o< y ��o2 . . MINUTES January 7, 1988 CITY OF NEWPOR'T BEACH ROLL -CALL INDEX 15. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 16. That the light system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent properties,. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed electrical engineer; with a letter from the engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 17. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall review the proposed plans and may require an automatic fire suppression/sprinkler protection. 18. That the Fire Department access shall be approved by the Fire Department. 19. That any roof top or other mechanical equipment and emergency power generators shall be screened from view. 20. Any construction on' the site shall be done ;in accordance with the height restriction of said area (i.e. 50 feet) and shall apply to any landscape materials, signs, flags, etc., as well as struc- tures. 21. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties and streets. 22. That the .entrance for the new driveway on Bison Avenue sha.'� be designed to provide sight distance in accordan.8 with City Standard 110-L and that any street trees, shrubs, and landscaping shall .be removed or trimmed as necessary to meet this requirement. 23. That a sidewalk connection shall be provided from Bison Avenue to the new facility in the vicinity of the new driveway entrance. 24. That the Planning Commission may add to or modify conditions of approval to this use permit, or ! recommend to the City Council the revocation of \, this use permit, upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this use permit causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, ; -27- - COMMISSIONERS Z O °F �F �q�m�`"m BG�� �N0 yyP�< y ff f�9y 1�1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 7, 1988 RO CALL INDEX safety_, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the community. 25. This use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.80.090 A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code: 26. That all evening activities shall be contained within buildings with the windows and the doors closed, with the exception of the period between June 15-through September 15 until 9:30 p.m. 27. That the buildings shall be constructed with a non - glare roofing material. 28. That the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department information regarding use of the facilities in the event that a Traffic Management Program needs to be implemented six months after completion of the facility. 29. That ingress/egress to Bison Avenue shall be \\\ constructed in such a manner that would not allow automobile headlights to strike adjacent residen- tial windows in the'residential tract souther* of Bison Avenue. 30. That the buildings shall t: sound attenuated in such a manner as to achieve a maximum sound level of 55 dBA at the property lines. Use Permit No. 1527 (Amended) (Public Hearing) Item No.6 Request to amend a previously approved use permit which UP1527(A) permitted the expansion of the existing Edwards Theatre complex located in Newport Center, so as to add two Approved additional theaters with a total of 600 additional seats. Said approval also included: the approval of,a new off -site parking agreement so as to provide a portion of the required off-street parking spaces in the Design Plaza parking area; the approval of an amended off -site parking agreement for the existing parking area located at the rear of the theater; and the approval of a modification to the zoning Code so as to allow the use of compact parking spaces. The proposed amendment involves a request to consider a new off -site parking area across the street in Fashion Island, in place bf the previously approved parking in Design Plaza. The -28- .• . L LEGEND 1. ASPHALT PARKING LOT PER CIVIL ENGINEER. 2. CRIB RETAINING WALL PER CIVIL ENGINEER. 3. rn INING Jan„ PER GIV1 ENGINrrrt 4. SIGN WALL TO MATCH EXISTING. 5. 5' x 8' PLANTERS WITH 6" CONCRETE CURB. 6., 6" CURB PER CIVIL ENGINEER. 7. PLANTER AREA 8. SIGN LIGHT. REFER TO ELECTRICAL ENG. PLANS. SEE DETAIL F, SHEET 3.3 9. PLAZA/FIELD AREA LIGHT. SEE DETAIL G, SHEET 3.3. REFER TO ELECTRICAL ENG. PLANS. 10. LOW LEVEL BOLLARD LIGHT. SEE DETAIL C, SHEET 3.3, 28" O.C. REFER TO ELECTRICAL ENG. PLAN$ 11. TRASH ENCLOSURE PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS. J // �� \\ \ V ♦,♦, \\ \ /'r \ \ V ♦� \ // /`^\ \ \V V ♦,♦ ice/ \ .10 �, \ \\ \V V ♦� // \ \, V! '♦' O \ —4— 4 \ \ \ ♦� ! _ — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — __ — — — — — — _ — — — — — — — — — \ r1= T—I—T—I—T—F—T—f-1 \ \ \V ♦�♦ \ ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 .� \ 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ♦� U I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I_J I I I I III I I \ 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I `L�100• 1 1 5 7 \ \ I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ CONSTRUCTION NOTES • CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY SHOULD FIELD COND11 IONS VARY FROM THOSE SHOWN ON PLAN. ° CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNIERGROUI'D UTILITY LINES, PI -ES, VAULTS OR BOXES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION, ANY DAMAGE llCUF'RED TO Atl- EXISTING UTILITY ELEMENTS SHALL BE REPAIRED PROPERLY AND IMMEDIATELY AT N't ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OW'ER. ° CONTRACTOR. SHALL SU3A1T A. UNIT COST FOR IMPORT SOIL IN -PLACE AND SHALL SC COM-LTELY AWARE OF THE AMOUNT OF SOIL RECESS"IY TO REA;:ii THE SAT!SFA'TORY GROUND LEVEL. ° CONTRACTOR SHALL BE P.ESPONSIBLE FOR POSi'IIVc OZPJNA(x OK SURFACE FLOW AREAS AT 1% CMl N.) ON HARDSCAPE AND 2% ON GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ° LOCATIONS OF CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS: LIGHTS, SIGNS, VEriFS ITYDRANTS, TANSFOR-RS, ETC., ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LAt.)S^APE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY SHOULD THE I LOCATION OF THESE ITEMS INTERFERE WITH THE PROPER EXECUTION OF HIS_ 0ORK. ° WHERE PAVING At.7 FINISH GRADE MEET, TW FINISH GRADE SHALL BE DEPRESSED 1° IN TURF AREAS AND 1 1/2' IN GROUND COVER AREAS. ° CONTROL JOINTS AND EXPANSION JOINTS ARE LOCATED ON PLAIN. ° CONCRETE IN ASPHALT PARKING LOT TO EE VERIFIED WITH SOILS ENGINEER FQ.R THICKNESS AND BASE PREPARATION. ° LIGrt FIXTURE LOCATIONS AS INDICATED ON THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. FINAL LOCATION TO BE VERIFIED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ON SITE. ° WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DRUM NGS. - ° PAVING AND CONCRETE SUBCONTRACTORS ARE TO COORDIK.TE AND COOPERATE WITH THE ELECTRICIAN, DRAIN LINE SUECONFRACTOR AND IRRIGATION SUxANfT.RA'TOR FOR SLEEVING, PIPING AND CONDUIT UNDER ALL PAVING. ° +CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION WHEN IT -IS OBVIOUS THAT UNKNOWN OBSTRUCTIONS AND/OR DIFFERENCES EXIST THAT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN KNOWN DURING DESIGN. SUCH ' CONDITIONS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNERIS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL NECESSARY REVISIONS DUE TO FAILURE TO GIVE SUCH NOTIFICATION. ° ALL WOW. SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LATEST A_I^=TED EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDIN;,' CODE AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL ANN STATE CODFS, OR_IRAtCFS AY'• REGULATIONS. ° .THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL V'1SIT THE SITE PRIOP 10 SUBMITTf NS RIDS. • SUB„'ONTPJCTORS SHALL BRING DISCREPANCIES IN PUN;, SITE CR01FITIONS AND PRIOR MO=3: TO THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S ATTENTION BEFORE AKY ADDITIONAL WORK IS PERFORMED. ° WHERE A CONFLICT OCCURS, SUCH AS BETWEEN GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIFIC DETAILS, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED AND HE WILL INTERPRET THE INTENT OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ° CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE OWNER WITH ALL WARMNTIES, GUARANTEES, AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS FOR EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES, FIXTURES, ETC. ° CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE FROM THE SITE AND LEGALLY DISPOSE OF ALL DEFT S AtD EXCAVATED MATERIAL NOT REQUIRED FOR FILL. NO RUBBISH DR DE%I S SHALL 13E BURIED ON THE SITE. c • SLOPE IN LAWN AREAS NOT TO EXCEED 3:1. ° PROJECT WALKS NOT TO EXCEED A SLOPE OF 2.0:1 OR 5% GRADIENT*. SLOPE IN GROUND COVER NOT TO EXCEED 2:1. ° RAWS•INTO BUILDINGS 41T TO EXCEED 12:1 OR 8.33%. ° HOLD FINISH GRADE A MINIM-JA OF 51, E:.LOW' FIN!Sti FLOO;: UNLESS OTI CW'!SE 16TE6. ° ALL =ROPERTY LINES AM LOT LINES SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO CT+.MENCiMS WORK. ° ALL CURVE TO CURVE AID CURVE TO TANGENT LINES SHILL BE NEAT, TRIM, SMOOTH Air;, UN.IFOR'?. ° SEE CIVIL ENGINEERIS PLAN FOR PRECISE GRADING AND DRAINAGE ELEVATIONS. ° ALL PAVED CONCRETE SURFACES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM. OF 3 1/2" THICKNESS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. ° ALL CONCRETE TO HAVE A MINIMUM CONIPRESSIVE STRENGT'! OF 2,50v' PSI C 2E DAYS. ° ALL DEMOLITION ITEMS SHALL BE REMOVED FRO(' THE PROJECT SITE, AND 'ENE DISPOSED ON IN ACCORDF.NCE WITH LOCAL CODES. ANY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, CU,.ES, WALY,S, PLAITING, WALLS, ETC. SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I i- I \��• \ I I ! I I I ! I I I I I ! 11<Li i i I I I I I I I I I I I F.H. I I u l l l l l l l l l l l l l l LiI I I I I I I I I I I I I I II 7 , \\\• \\\ 11 O \ I■�■nr.Na■�■�■�■�■�.�■�■�■�■�■�>. SEE SHEET L-2.1 FOR ENLARGEMENT \ \ \ I I I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I (� I I I I � i I I I � I I I 11 I I �� _ \• \ \ I ! I I I� I I I I I I I ! ! I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I — 1 \\ \ 1-I-1-LJ--L-LJ-L-I-J-LJ=1=LJ-L=L� L-J_LJ-LJ_1-I--L-L1-L--L11-LJ-LEI I- \ \ \ -- - - - - _ ' Lu \ \ \ 1— -------------------- ----y Lu z I \ Iw ! AUDITORIUM Lu r----------, ------ I I � 1L � JL-�--fL-� iu�--rL-� a Q 5 \\ \\ \ \ ! I I I I I I I 1cc 1 I J \\ \ I 1 L_� I I iLu Lu ! \ \\ \ \ ! L----------J I 1a: \ \ I 10 1 1 r \ \ \ ILL �= I c� \• \\ \ ---- i i---- i L------ 1 I J 1F=� I w 1- \\ \\ O _ _ ILU 1 � ® \\ \ I I I IIF IF I • \ I I I I I I � I ® ` •` • \ 1 11 I Lu 1 7 5 7 \\\ \\ \\\ 1 F - - - - - - - - - - - El 11 ! I I 1 ! ---- --- — — — — L----------J of 1 F------1------- 1 I ! \\ �1 FELLOWSHIP HALL ® O s 7 \'I �► \` \\ L------I-----J 1 '�♦ ` I 7J •�'e El 1-------L 1 7 2 ---------- ! I ------------- +_ M - 1 —----------------- SEE SHEET L-2.1 FOR ENLARGE2Fa O L '�- -- _ b 4 - ^ 1 BISON AVENUE Fi 7 •.: N vl x i_._ 3 3 o r, E:o�'S v Ri3 E r:= ry ° Y n r m = r *n C U �v E c Sr'6 E2 L m N Q aac', F a Z 2 o 2>> Z a m O u O Z o < CL- o a_ z u' O 3 ,� v — � U o c aI_L_I LL-_ CA F- U < z o O ILL U J Lij� W z CL 0Ily->< Q ~Z0 cid D�m0 �Qoz = Q J •. i i. E o LD W o � 0 I1 w 0 0 La co co <r 0 0 o � u li ... SHEET NO. L 1.1 a MTEX CH -/DST SCALE t•=30' A OF 7 MATCH EXISTING MTE"K"-V ST 1 t 0 0 CONSTRUCTION LEGEND NO. DESCRIPTION. DETAIL SHEET REFERENCE NO. MATERIAL/FINISH 1 CONCRETE PAVING G 3.2 NATURAL COLOR CONCRETE/LIGHT SANDBLAST FINISH 2 TILE PAVING H 3.2 SLATE TILE TO MATCH INTERIOR TILE 3 BRICK PAVER G 3.2 GRAY BRICK TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE 4 BRICK BAND H 3.2 GRAY BRICK TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE 5 HAND RAH_ D 3.2 6 DRAIN INLET AS INDICATED ON CIVILS PLANS ZURN 8'X8" TYPE Y BRONZE 7 CURB AS PER CIVIL ENGINEER 8 SEATWALL C 3.2 NATURAL COLOR-CONCRETE/LIGHT SANDBLAST FINISH 9 CONCRETE STEPS E 3.2 NATURAL COLOR CONCRETE/LIGHT SANDBLAST FIINISH 10 ''CHEEK WALL B 3,2 NATURAL COLOR / LIGHT SANDBLAST FINISH 11 VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT C 32 12 EXPANSION JOINT F 3.2 13 SCORE JOINT F 3.2 14 ENTRANCE MATS 15 TREE UPLIGHT E 3.3 16 ARCHITECTURAL UPLIGHT E 3.3 17 CONCRETE PAVING BAND G 32 NATURAL COLOR CONCRETE/MEDIUM SANDBLAST FINISH 18 STEP LIGHT B 3.3 19 PLANTER CUT-OUT 5'-0" SO 20 SERVICE RAMP A 3.2 , NATURAL COLOR CONCRETE/MEDIUM SANDBLAST FINISH NOTE: REFER TO ARCHITECTS PLANS FOR SPECIFICATIONS AND MANUFACTURER OF BRICK AND TILE. t SCALE 1 "=16'-O" 24• 4'-10" 5 9 8 2 - i _ .. � �; 2- W Ct l i �' �' I riS COLIC rZF`� �E% E� � �✓ * \ '- -� _ � \`� � FcaT 2 r �N 7j 4 �<I o D % SECTION �\ i/ j I) , v D 0 f��` t �_ -- - �d-. ryy _ _ .. :•'jIVN .fl0'� Yil{31r1W! , 24"-....-. / y 8 1 $ SECTION 6 f 1 1 / v1 1�1 g s LEGEND: 4I 4 PLAN 1.CONCRETE SEATWALL NATURAL COLOR 9 WITH LIGHT SANDBLAST FINISH. A ' LEGEND: 2.12"CHAMFER 1. CHEEK WALL NATURAL COLORED CONCRETE 3. PAVING. SEE DETAIL G, THIS SHEET. WITH LIGHT SANDBLAST FINISH. 4.4" PERFORATED PIPE IN 3/4" DIA CRUSHED 2. #3 REBAR 18" O.C. BOTH WAYS ROCK WRAP IN TERRA BOND 3. STEPS. SEE DETAIL E, THIS SHEET. ENGINEERING FABRIC, 9"X9", #1115 BY I - _ 4. FINISH GRADE OF TURF SLOPE. • WARRENS (714) 422-5100. SEE CIVIL S. SEATWALL SEE DETAIL C, THIS SHEET. PLANS FOR DRAIN INLET LOCATIONS. 6. PAVING. SEE DETAIL G, THIS SHEET. 5. CHEEK WALL SEE DETAIL B, THIS SHEET. ��W Ile) LOII 7. 90% COMPACTED SUBGRADE. PLAN 6. REBAR 18" O.C. BOTH WAYS 8. 12" CHAMEFIR. 7. FINISH GRADE 9. CURB AT RAMP. SEE DETAIL D. THIS SHEET. 8. 90%. COMPACTED SUBGRADE 10. 3/8'VERTICAL EXPANSOIN JOINT. 9. 3/8" VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT. 2T O.C., SEE PLAN. OB CHEEK WALL 1/2"=1'-0" �C SEATWALL 3/4"=1'-011 IB 12,1 yf ecraa 3 IL _ o i I \ 't J 5 /(0LID 77 Le. 10 lii=lt�l 2A. 3 y/ J \.1��/ •. 1 LEG 1 •. " 1 ' /Z 1.2 OED. METAL TUBING. POSTS TO BE 8' O.C., SEE \ . yI • \\� ° \� f �� �� Y ELEVATION BELOW. APPLY (1) COAT SHOP PRIMER ' • 6 I•"E �•. 12 AND (2) COATS EXTERIOR ENAMEL, COLOR TO BE 7 \� O SELECTED BY CT. ) Imo- Ifi 2.3"STEEL SLEEVEE WITH WITH POR-ROCK TO RECEIVE POSTS. � 'G �--� 6 3.12" CHAMFER ALL CONCRETE EDGES. \ I D p 4. EXPANSION JOINT W/ SEALANT - REFER TO DETAIL 122 d F, SHEET L3.2. I?� 5. CONCRETE PAVING - REFER TO DETAIL G, SHEET L3.2. 6. #3 REBAR, 24" O.C. a ly 7. CONCRETE FOOTING a 8.90% COMPACTED SUBGRADE 4 9. CONCRETE CURB LEGEND: i 9 10. FINISH GRADE / 11. CONCRETE RAMP. NATURAL COLOR WITH LIGHT- 1. CONCRETE PAVING �+ BROOM FINISH 12.3/8" I.D. EYEBOLT WELD TO POST 2. 3/8" SEALED EXPANSION JOINT 13.HEAVYDUTYGALVANIZEDTURNBUCKLE . ����qq��EE EEEELL pp pppS� L 14. GALV. CLAMP 3 (2) COATSTEXTERIOR ERA OVER 1) COAT PRIME COLOR TO BE SELOECTED. BUSH W/ F.S. 15. HOLE FOR CABLE AT POST 4. "1/2" DIAMETER TOOLED BULLNOSE 16.3/16^DIA. AIRCRAFT CABLE 5. CONCRETE STEPS. NATURAL COLOR WITH MEDIUM SANDBLAST FINISH. ' 6II 18. GUARDARAIL R REFER TO D TEFER TOIAIL D, SHEET L3.2 6. CONCRETE FOOTING, 8" SQ. Ito . NOTE: 7. CONCRETE FOOTING FOOTING SIZES AND REBAR FOR BIDDING PURPOSES 8. /3 REBAR, 24" 0. C. EACH WAY 10. NON -SLIP TREADS ONLY. FINAL DESIGN BASED UPON STRUCTURAL 9 • 90% COMPACTED SUBGRADE. ENGINEERS REVIEW. A RAMP D RAMP/HAf�DRAIL 1/2"=1'-0° �E CONCRETE STEPS/HAND RAIL 3/4'�=1�-0° 1 3 4 5 LEGEND. v ;- I____gAVING FINISHED SURFACE �p 2. 1/40 RADIUS (TYP.) - 3.. POLYSULFIDE SEALANT ,, 4. BACKER ROD r !i _� l . F -5. ASPHALTIC FIBERBOARD Y 6" 1/8''W XI%ZNO TOOLED 4 " CONTROL JOINT . -�-' :: S _' :: 7 4 •-:: �° 7. #3 REBAR 1r SLIP DWEEL . . NOTE SEALANT ro BE APR WALL - WALL AND BULDNG COMECTKAJS A. EXPANSION JOINT W/SEALANT 7 O 4 N 4 I. PAVER TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE. 1 ti 2. CO TE PAVING. NATURAE COLOR WITH LIGHT SANDBLAST FINISH 3. 3/8" D JOINT WITH GROUT TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE 4. 3/4" MO BED O jp` 5.CONCRETE ASE 6.13 REBAR @ 2 C. 3 7. FINISH GRADE 1 / LOW TOP OF WALL 10 4 8. 90Fo COMPACTED SU ADE 9(D C :-O U 1' PA 9 3 (� � -2 2 6 + 2' o' 2'-8• NOTES: I- (^'•'1� 3 4 1 .3 2 T. PAVING THICKNESS PER I OR 2' 0' PAVING DETAILS 21 811 /v • 2. LOCATE EXP. JOINTS @ 20' 3 2 O 3 6 O.C. MAX OR AS.SHOWN 1 2 PLA/�� /g•• 3. LOCATE SCORE JOINTS @ 8' < N O.C. MAX OR AS SHLUNp'D.•.',�n_\ G fl - r 4. REFER TO -PLANS FOR JOINT ° LOCATIONS 7 6 5 7 S. SEALANT TO BE SAND /. \, ° o. °: o :(,°o o p en.>.p g. o N •c 9� •- y ', a I14PREGNATEO, COLOR TO 1 (. MATCH ADJACENT GROUT. 5 10 9 8 -6-1 `\ LEGEND: LEGEND QSCORE JOINT 1 7 1 • GRAY BRICK PAVER TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE 2. CONCRETE PAVING. NATURAL COLOR WITH LIGHT SANDBLAST FINISH. 1. BRICK PAVER TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE. SOLDIER COURSE 3. 318" EXPANSION JOINT WITH,$EALANT TO MATCH GROUT. SEE DETAIL F, THIS SHEET. 2. SLATE TILE TO MATCH INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE. APPLY AQUA SEAL ".3 •. o ^ - T 4.3/8• 3. CONCRETE PAVING :EXPANSION JDOWE SEALANT_ SEE DETAIL F, THIS SHEET. 4. 3/8" FELT EXPANSION JOINT WITH SEALANT TO MATCH GROUT 5. #3 REBAR 12" SLIP DOWEL. 6.3/8" TOOLED JOINT WITH GROUT TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE. 5. 1' MORTAR BED ! \ 7.8"X8" BRICK PAVER IN CENTER, ROSE COLOR. INSTALL ZURN DRAIN STRAINER IN 6. CONCRETE SUB -BASE 6 �� 1/ 54 �� CENTER WHERE INDICATED PER CIVIL ENGINEERS PLANS, 8"X8" TYPE "Y" WITH 7. •3 REBAR @ 24" O.C. � BRONZE PLATING. RELOCATI=AS-REOLYIHED- 8.'3 REBAR 12' SLIP DOWELL @ 24' 0C. 8 O 8. CONCRETE SUB -BASE. 9. TILE GROUT TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE IN SIZE AND TYPE 9. #3 REBAR @ 24" O.C. EACH WAY. 10. 3/8" TOOLED JOINT WITH GROUT TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE 10.3/4" MORTAR BED. 1I.90%COMPACTED SUB -BASE 11.90% COMPACTED SUB -GRADE. F PAVING JOINTS NTS G CONCRETE PAVING/ BRICK PAVER 1"=1'-0" H BRICK PAVING/TILE PAVING NTS O BRICK PAVING EDGE 114=1'-014 DIETE"IC"•p5T CLE""FPINT lOIO Q I. iss' sr� C'E.'_' •V• G N N-Cop '� O rO F. c tEr �; en c. o=' vZ0. r , v , • gY, � J9 Y e�. a m a a E 8 0 z H O O V J U) J J Q 2 E•- W 0 U) Z O O= U LL IC F_ Q F_0S = 0 N Z V a O Q W U CU W Qa W O Z Om Q C) m o C.) D Q CaS U) G O W Z Z Lzi r J z LL O 281990 Q 0 O U own SHEET NO. L 3"2 Q� OF 7 SHTS w,� Y��E9E N O k I➢� �� m O� E: o t 3 4 .�.. sssp000 oc 8„TcZ ga �rYEzg :: a ry ��5t V]w. •�p Ek ;3 7 V a0 r 3 u _ C • A " 5 n G N N Q N Q u 3� e, a QY u s? Z a nt u; A n,as, • 0,.ilu, •Opp IT IT a his, a rM . I � t. N Ai t C L _ T `e N J � Y C t S f 5 C Z O ro LU LU C4 a . H Q . O N Ln N Z 0 U J � Q W 2 C � O O LIJ J = � C) LLCC D o co O °6 _ U d w U W (n =) CL WU Q O w< LUU �— Z o F- U) Q m d C o3 Q Q ow �z J z uj G o FM 281990 0 cc 0 0 0 u mom SHEET NO. L 3.3 of 7 SHTS 0 v 0 Q O I� I W W ry O M W • o�e OETEIIICMapET BISON AVENUE i Y O r 00 \ \ \ \ p11 \ .00 1 c` i T 3S • � I 4, I q., 1n' go-" iv 11 Wtl �m 141 Y'14V -7T77TF7F �v 1 ='doge � ZS EN zioda �U ' ' V) Ia c u -L `off Q L C a c J J Q = o 0 o o V l � o v J 0 w to L_ U < d3� z o =DUw< U z w` w �zom U)� Qofm0 =o03-9 z z ^Q I�.L z O Q 0 cr Lli CL Q U 0 Q J ro 0 0 Z X go 0 OD (D o o u . i . SHEET NO. L 4.1 SCALE A 177370, ][l oF 7 SHTS Y kJ LEGEND, N h -T:cr'2 N a SYMBOL MANUFACTURER MODEL NO./DESCRIPTION GPM PSI I RAD DETAIL i tuith kx-e//y cover. nbrk "RCY'oni ir Q RAIN BIRD PA-8S-80-FLT SHRUB SPRAY .33 20 8 'A' E ; fr s _ U2 . 4 L,.2TfR,4L L/NL` `-F/N/5�/ Gf?llDl sAolioR /wm[x]- m u�rr 59, 0 5P111 AJ' HEAD v RAIN BIRD PA-8S-8H-FLT SHRUB SPRAY .65 20 8 'A' = a o k ON L/NE- 51��t/E-CONOL//T EA/5TING BLDG. a Y � c as CONTfiOL 6,//f�La . , ' i ;' I 0� 1/fADf� RAIN BIRD PA-8S-120 SHRUB SPRAY .53 20 10 'A' 3 0 R �/=� PVC SLf'. VO f`ISLN y E N nlla�� 111 III �- �� I O -- - - 1( CO/�TiQOL VMlff u RAIN BIRD PA-SSSHRUB SPRAY .70 20 10 'A' < < z < N o _ SN�'P TITS o cK> _ Co`>Mc�N f/N/5�1 C�i4l�L= v E Y - _ " RAIN BIRD PA-8S-12H SHRUB SPRAY 1.05 20 10 A' r I A PVC lwzf ADAPlOfz �9 _ _ `5S -;E i 0 NOTES • 1 ?-/Cpuirrd) a RAIN BIRD PA-8S-12F SHRUB SPRAY 2.10 20 10 'A' a a i c i u N Q ,4LL PLASTIC P/P/NG TO BL' �- ` ' ' SIYACfD /N Tf f11&11f16. l I PVC sc/I A'I RAIN BIRD PA-SS-15Q SHRUB SPRAY 75 20 12 A' o F= a Z � I 3 .� 3 0 2. WNLIt � TAPE' A✓/Q/NG �, l �� �I I RAIN BIRD PA-SS-15T SHRUB SPRAY 1.00 20 12 'A' = e : ° ; Z at AT /O 1 WM9VI L S. ! II I I I PP,/C ELL IIIVI 3. Af A LOOSE= 20" /_O& D /N NOTE. instal/ heads as r /Nfz/SL /'i �% RAIN BIRD PA-8S-15H SHRUB SPRAY 1.50 20 12 A' tr Al/P/N6 AT C.U,4N6f Of o1 ` r?• ohwe va rn the (as r r�uired) .9 ® RAIN BIRD PA-8S-15F SHRUB SPRAY 3.00 20 12 'A' DifZfCT/ON 6f L'4TL /2 PVC N1101011E /nterror af'fbntin� O!i COUPL AI& _"� I I hea5 1175tal/ At S m RAIN BIRD PA-8S-15EST SHRUB SPRAY .50 20 4X14 'A' TAWN 30°. UNTIL ALL LOOPS `' o 9rbde nrxf PoLYfAlfF ENE: IIIII m.11 e I, CLL iN BACrs!`ILL AfTffz ALL CONNECT/DNS - iI tU 6/dys t fxaders. fLf_X /r/S� ��� f ��� A/ MI ❑ RAIN BIRD PASS-15SST SHRUB SPRAY 1.00 20 4X24 'A' Q./74T/ON 01YF CUB/`F�r 1 �-1fV0 5_-h. 40 TEE RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM-80-FLT SHRUB POP-UP .33 20 8 'B' ;x) CWT/ON5 fOfr BACKfILL '/aCRI✓'SyEO RoCK „ O� �LL RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM-8T-FLT SHRUB POP-UP 43 20 8 B' AND C011.71 4CT'ON PVC N411Y L INE COMMON y �; /aL'�L11/2fIVLFtiTS PVC TEL f COIt/TP�L /f �, RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM-SH-FLT SHRUB POP-UP 65 20 8 B' L ^tip • ?a�� I; Pvc LAT�`,4L� � RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM•120 SHRUB POP-UP 53 20 10 B' RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM-12T SHRUB POP-UP .70 20 10 B' ,a M I TRENCHING E CONTROL VALVE A SHRUB SPRAY ON RISER � RAIN BIRD 1806•SAM-1SHRUBPOP-UP 15 20 10 • It?RAIN BIRD 1806•SAM-1505Q SHRUB POP-UP .75 20 12 'B' 47 RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM-15T SHRUB POP-UP 1.00 20 12 B' 1 V sl RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM-15H SHRUB POP-UP 1.50 20 12 'B' r' T LEGEND: ///7!✓j-1 G/N�� r�!'¢� 'r V.1.7. 'TWIST -BRACE' F/hi'J.•+' ..� h't��-� x '( STOCK fLP 2 REQ'D PER Q�1 0 RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM-I5EST SHRUB POP-UP .50 20 4X14 'B' �� [�'�S TREE. AVAILABLE FROM: u{.1/L fY �rr $ fie Ystro�r;e, �u/;',5 ��. smm � 'C" V.I.T. COMPANY ;4e 1.1 15561 PRODUCT LANE /none/ sO�eeI7 I I 1 ❑. RAIN BIRD: 1806-SAM-ISSST SHRUB POP-UP 1.00 20 4X2 'B' ` g UNIT D-4 , o HUNTINGTON BCH• 92649 i BAC,KfLO�,/ P/zfl�`N/f/z '�'`'�'_=��'"''' '� = -�"" 0 RAIN BIRD 18C4-SAM-10O-LA TURF POP-UP .33 20 8 (714) 891-8338 !III = i z. 10'X2-1/2" a MIN MASS ASSf�3�Y _ ^ LODGEPOLE PINE STAKE I r--------- ----------- RAIN BIRD 1804-SAM-IOH-LA TURF POP-UP .65 20 8 'C' � 3. WATER BASIN -LIP HT.- 3" MIN 4. TABLETS PER SPECS m RAIN BIRD 1804-SAM-12Q TURF POP-UP .53 20 10 C. _ S. PREPARED BACKFILL--SEE LANDSCAPE SPECS 1 6. LEVELLING LAYER -TAILED I / SN.��++yi••�F%�.L7 /.iI%4 ® RAIN BIRD 1804•SAM-12T TURF POP-UP .70 20 10 C. _ s a I I I i UNION c- gI ya S,"" /N`L (1 RAIN BIRD 1804-SAM-12H TURF POP-UP 1.05 20 10 C. eS 8 _ n 4 L .I� RAIN BIRD 1804-SAM-12F TURF POP-UP 2.:0 20 C. `� I 1 •$ K JJIj� ' r -------------J" lI 2 z C_ CJ RAIN BIRD 1804-SAM-150 TURF POP-UP .75 20 12 C. ds RAIN BIRD 1804-SAM-15T TURF POP-UP 1.00 20 12 C' �. �,n• -` I ,��uuli tlhh I I . iil; � III RAIN BIRD 1804-SAM-15H TURF POP-UP 1.50 20 12 �� �' q• RAIN BIRD 1804-SAM-15F TURF POP-UP 3.00 20 12 G /-fV C CL L 0 RAIN BIRD #33 DRC QUICK COUPLING VALVE. 6 CONC7afTf STA,B,4L/Zf/' ° _- i GRISWOLD 2000 SERIES REMOTE CONTROL VALVE SIZE (AS NOTED). 'E' SASS ELLS PVC i �VY 70 (J II �C fT O FEBCO 825Y REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE BACKFLOW PREVENTION 'F' q F y DEVICE. SEE PLAN FOR SIZE. 2" X DIA OF ROOTBAL , ✓��/L( / \--PVC. NIBGO T-113 LINE SIZE GATE VALVE. 'G' PYC TFf orf�L /N L,4'TL f24' ® z IRRI-TROL ' MC -PLUS SERIES ELECTRIC WALL MOUNT CONTROLLER. INSTALL 'H' O IN A VANDAL PROOF ENCLOSURE. j N �I TREE STAKING BACKFLOW PREVENTER NTS APPROVED LATERAL LINE, CL. 200 PVC PIPE, SIZE AS NOTED. 'I' Reduced Pressure Principle Type B SHRUB SPRAY POP U P APPROVED MAINLINE 1 1/2' &SMALLER SCH. 40 PVC PIPE. 2" &LARGER 'I' w CL. 315 PVC PIPE. -� -- APPROVED SLEEVE, SCH. 40 PVC PIPE 4" DIA. MIN. INSTALL 24" BELOW I' F/N/Sl/ GAOL FINISHED GRADE. EXTEND 12' PAST EDGE OF PAVING. -•-•- APPROVED CONDUIT, SCH. 40 PVC PIPE, 2" MIN. DIA. I' O Z L L EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER METER BY OTHERS. - - - I- h F Rn r-,•� /F p ; IUIII=IIIII - = II��II(= IIIII °0 RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM-160-SLA SHRUB POP-UP - . 67 20 14 B' �,/NSn'G u�� LPLc'J/�� Vv:b_ .i X rvri /aE;� IIIIVI=`11-11�= -11111 n I morkeC G�` ��1�1 I1u�11u y RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM-I6H-SLA SHRUB POP-UP 1.33 20 14 'B' V• /" LEGEND: _q n j 1. CRUNN OF PLANT TO BE Nk L� ( _ PP✓P UP PLANTED 1/2" ABOVE F.G. p//'/Fn�-1 3 2. DEPRESSED BASIN W'/PIULCH V< S/-/4A/ 9f410 GENERAL NOTES ' 7 4 ON TOP (SEE SPFC.S) _ 3. BACKFILL MIX PER SPECS 4. AGRIFOPJI PLANT TABLETS PER SPECS GATE V4LVE ALL MAIN LINE PIPING AND CONTROL WIRES UNDER PAVING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SEPARATE SLEEVES. MAIN - 5 5. WATER SETTLED NATIVE LINE SLEEVE SIZE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWICE (2X) THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE TO BE SLEEVED. CONTROL -- BACKFILL MIX (SEE SPECS) II I N 6. NATIVE EARTH I ^ I PirL MiIiNUNI ( WIFE SLEEVES SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE FOR THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF WIRES UNDER PAVING. 7. TEMPORARY 2" BERM / PVC, Seh. BO ALL LATERAL LINE PIPING UNDER PAVING SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 PIPE AND SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO 1 \ _ 6 / i II; I Iq fjlSffj PAVING. O I 1 PIPE SIZES SHALL CONFORM TO THOSE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF SMALLER PIPE SIZES U I _III �- 2 X 1) 8 M ROOTSALt � y _ SHALL BE PERMITTED, BUT SUBSTITUTIONS OF LARGER SIZES MAY BE APPROVED. ALL DAMAGED AND m ; NOTES: I �, F REJECTED PIPE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AT THE TIME OF SAID REJECTION. 1. UNTANGLE MATTED ROOTS Bl LOOSENING ALL ROOTS & i1•-love. IEEE EDGE OF R0.TBALL W/OIEI �y7 _ FINAL LOCATION OF THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S AUTHORIZED FROM HOSE _ ONE CUU3 /C T 4C r REPRESENTATIVE. e Cf=USf,E,O /zGc"K Q _ l ' ' F�VL' S'T/QIEfT 120 VAC ELECTRICAL POWER SOURCE AT CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS. THE " T may' ELL IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE FINAL CONNECTION FROM THE ELECTRICAL SOURCE TO THE h.%.' ' ' !ns/o// w/�• ax //b. asp o CONTROLLER p Co rr m Y a Fi3S4 ¢. /T - 4"i!/7G (Ll.I GimJ Gad h• m :tY/ 1p br>�., PVC. SCh N NIPPLE ALL SPRINKLER HEADS SHALL BE SET PERPENDICULAR TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFICED. J Tff arfLL /N L/ITL fzAL Q THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL FLUSH AND ADJUST ALL SPRINKLER HEADS AND VALVES FOR OPTIMUM COVERAGE WITH MINIMAL OVERSPRAY ONTO WALKS, STREETS, WALLS, ETC. THIS SHALL INCLUDE REGULATING THE PRESSURE AT EACH VALVE TO OBTAIN THE OPTIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE FOR EACH W SYSTEM. 3 0 O K PLANTING PIT NTS G GATE VALVE o C POP-UP SPRAY HEAD THIS DESIGN IS DIAGRAMMATIC- ALL PIPING, VALVES, ETC., SHOWN WIT111N PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN � CLARIFICATION ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLANTING AREAS WHEREVER PCSSIBLE. THE CONTRACTOR z SHALL LOCATE ALL VALVES IN SHRUB AREAS. O O IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH ALL GRACE w NC:,T:: iN5T,.�LL fii�M G-/? f`�i"' Nfff��sT q0✓=""(/T N !/4N04L Pi�f 1wl�E,J AI4Ef% DIFFERENCES. LOCATION Or WALLS, RETAINING WALLS, STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES. THE IRRIGATION _ le - CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ALL ITEMS DAMAGED BY HIS WORK. HE SHALL COORDINATE HIS ec X/CK COUPLL:R !% z / " Qrj�/�L F WORK WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS FOR THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF PIPE SLEEVES AND LATERALS %`%f�7• y_ / [ 475" /% 2'oww gmae m Aeda THROUGH WALLS, UNDER ROADWAYS AND PAVING, ETC. 0 04(51P16 lAeI6. 5UGPLr A/C. !/uah fo yrx� m .vr! ors.) O � - e DO NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS IN THE 1 _ 23432 50Uj!/ F:,'Ic/TE /.5a. f,%y/SL/ Gr�r+/JE FIELD THAT THAT MIGHT UNKNOWN OBSTRUCTIONS, NOT HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED IINDTHE IENGINEERINGFFERENCES . SUCH OBSTRUCTIONS ORFFERENCES IN THE EDIFDFIMENSIOERNCES SHOULD NS EXIST U ? V -� LA661A14 .1//LL5, CA. 9210--53 i C7/Q� 83�- � I 1 1 1 I I BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. IN THE EVENT THIS W m ` �Wr NOTIFICATION IS NOT PERFORMED, THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR w = - • "' ANY REVISIONS NECESSARY. O U U MOUNT�.' W < < \`J COIVT/QOZZz Q LINT � ALL SPRINKLER EQUIPMENT, NOT OTHERWISE DETAILED OR SPECIFIED SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER �- :z0 m z p-_ • = , -;' d 3�,' = MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. N K- It le- .- -- - i O.ti'-Ofi` �'✓17C MNOIPT REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILED INFORMATION. 0 ry m O Z IE 57451E 1=1 z O 39 ELE:ATIO:i YIEi �flN/SL! Gf�.�i - - ADV (ANTI -DRAIN VALVES) UNI AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS ARE FOR TYPICAL INSTALLATION ONLY. AND ¢ p Z Q c I 1 ql,1174� ,MAY NOT BE REQUIRED ON L HEADS. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WITH THEESPALIER DETAIL " 1 I BRnss N/PP_'E Ott SITE GRADES. IF THF.nE IS AN ELEVATION DIFFERENCE OF 2a^ OR h10RE BETWEEN THE HIGHEST HEAD AND^LOWEST HEAD ON A SYSTEM, THE ADVS SHALL PE INSTALLED PER THE DETAIL. w { 4. {�y. ° R1,15W ESPALIER DETAIL -_ c e a ,. I e ' • ? i • e I%5 °'-^ • I ° . e , THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE STATIC PRESSURE TO BE AS STATED ON THE SYSTEM REAL DEMENTS. Z H 1- ATTACH N0. 6 EYE SCREW TO WALL- USE NYLON oI've •• '�' .`_ J ���5 p/ F r O EXPANDING PLUG ON STUCCO OR ORELL AND ANCHOR Li' e c e N/r? " SHOULD THE STATIC PRESSURE EXCEED 20%, INSTALL A WILKINS' 600 SERIES PRESSURE REGULATING VALVE U 0 - TO MASONRY BLOCK AS REQUIRED. " (1N A SEPARATE VALVE BOX) DIRECTLY DOWN STREAM OF THE BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE. SET THE cu 2. 140. 12 WIRE - TWIST CONNECT TO EYE SCREWS '.t_ "" Y D1.9, C9115211/T MR / /-'w55 tREGULATING VALVE A7 1o°i° HIGHER THAN THE STATED SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS �LS STRETCH TIGHT _ �+ , . SHOULD THE STATIC `43. VINE LOCATION ELSCjfrrCAL JPi9rY$FOGf. _P✓ n TE: PRESSURE BE LESS THAN THE STATED PRESSURE, NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. cB 28 1990 F- M _1"0A CON,04I1 ' FJ2 �� AI-1 °7ATED GALLC'N.ACES IN VALVE CALL -CUTS ARE ROUNDED UP TO NEAREST GAL' -ON. r?O !/AC CONJU/T RI O eil wli -v7yr f' he �'DYi It cl�nmer.%o/ me /cry OW h c 2) Fr7s io arrnT CONTROLLER STATION NUI�ER ANDSCAPE cc F- �+ Y RRIGATION O o ♦ 0 GALLONS PER MNx1TE ONSULTING 00 o •- VALVE SRE � SHEET NO. L � . P L ESPALIER NTS H CONTROLLER D QUICK COUPLING VALVE 2435 Del ■ OF 7 ' SHTS f I PLANTING LEGEND SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME/Common Name SIZE UANTITY �— SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME/Common Name SIZE QUANTITY TREES: VINES: SBMB�F9t —� ♦ V-1 PARTHENOCISSUS TRICUSPIDATA 1 GAL. 8 ."-,U-- Boston Ivy O T-2 CUPANIOPSIS ANACARDIOIDES 15 GAL. 41 �p�V-2 b!5Tfe:FI5 Bttee""fftf 5 SAE. 26 CARROT WOOD B,__d Red Trumpet V4e O T-3 LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA 5/15 GAL, 23/5. GROUNDCOVERS: American Sweet Gum (SEE PLAN) G-1 HEDERA HELIX"'HAHNII' FLATS 8" O.C. O T-4 PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA 'BLOOOGOOD' 15 GAL. 5 Hahn's Ivy London Plane Tree YXXXJ�I G-2 AGAPANTHUS ORIENTALTS- 1 GAL. 24 O.C. O T-5 ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 36" BOX 15 4- LILY OF THE NILE Chinese Evergreen Elm - G-3 LIRIOPE MUSCARI 1 GAL. - 't1FRrC( Lily 0 -ov- T-6 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN Big'Blue Lily Turf 0 -7 PINUS HALEPENSIS 5/15 GAL. 32J15 G-4 TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES LINERS- C. ALEPPO PINE (SEE HLAN) Star Jasmine SHRUBS: //��- G-5 TURF (TO MATCH EXISTING) SEED ++-S 1 BBtlE11411IVItEE6 SR 5 6fct. —20-- N SN- 0 S-2 CARRISSA FRANDIFLORA 'TUTTLE' 5 GAL. 41 I \\ \y 6-6 VINCA MAJOR FLATS 12' O.C. Natal Plum G-7 LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS'GOLD MOUND' 1 GAL. 36" O.C. S-3 LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM 'TEXANUM' 5 GAL. 228 ��'`� LANTANA NCN O S-4 RAPHIOLEPIS INDICA'BALLERINA' 5 GAL. 569 72�L­� ' bt-I India Hawthorn C \ ��� r1— T—I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ \�.�$00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I i I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I U ` 1 I 1 I - I I I I I I _J I I I I 1 I I I I L I NOTE:INSTALL DRIP WATERING DEVICE •� �\ TO IRRIGATE EXISTING TREES (T=6) T6 NOTE: G1 TO BE PLANTED IN �•� S4 BISON AVENUE PLANTTING NOTES PLANTING NOTES ' • ALL TREES WITHIN A SPECIES SHALL NAVE MATCHING FORM. ° ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS TO RECEIVE AUTOMATED IRRIGATION. ° REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL PREPARATION, FERTILIZATION, MULCHING, AND OTTER ADDITIONAL PLANTING IN=OPMATION. - ° ALL PLANT MATERIAL, ESPECIALLY TREES LARGER THAN 24" BOX SMALL BE APPROVED BY TIE OWIERIS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ° FINAL LOCATION OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE OWNER'S - AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. ° CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWN=WS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT • OF WORK TO COORDINATE PROJECT INSPECTION SCHEDULES. ° SEE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STAKING METHOD, PLANT PIT DIMENSIONS AND BA(X(FILL REQUIREMENTS. ° IF CONFLICTS ARISE BETWEEN SIZE OF AREAS AND PLANS, CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION. FAILURE TO MAKE SUCH CONFLICTS KI4OW'N TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL RESULT IN CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY TO RELOCATE THE MATERIALS. ° ALL LAWN AREAS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM GROUNDCOVER AND SHRUB AREAS WITH EITHER. CONCRETE OR REDWOOD HEADER OR A SHOVEL EDGE CUT, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. • CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT,FOR APPROVAL PHOTOS OF ALL BOXED TREES. PHOTOS SHOULD INCLUDE A PERSON FOR SCALE PURPOSES. ALL BOX TREES SHALL BE OF QUALITY AS DETERMINED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. MATERIAL FOUND UNSUITABLE FOR THE DESIGN OR SPECIFICATION INTENT - WILL BE REJECTED. - IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FURNISH PLANT MATERIALS FREE OF PESTS OR PLANT DISEASES. PRE -SELECTED OR 'TAGGED' MATERIAL MUST BE INSPECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND -- CERTIFIED PEST AND DISEASE FREE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OBLIGATION TO WARRANTY ALL PLANT MATERIALS PER THE SPECIFICATIONS. ° CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIMSELF FAMILIAR WITH ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, PIPELINES AND STRUCTILRES. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE SOLE RESPONSIBi LITY FOR ANY , COST INCURRED DUE TO DAMAGE OF SAID UTILITIES. ' .° CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION AS D15SIGNED WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT UNKNOWN OBSTRUCTIONS AND/OR GRADE DIFFERENCES EXIST THAT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN KNOWN DURING DESIGN. SUCH CONDITIONS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL NECESSARY REVISIONS DUE TO FAILURE TO GIVE SUCH NOTIFICATION. _ ° CONTRACTOR, SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY COORDINATION WITH SUBCONTRACTORS AS REWIRED TO ACCOMPLISH PLANTING OPERATIONS. ° CONTRACTOR TO RECEIVE SITE GRADED TO +0.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN LETTER OF GRADE / CERTIFICATION FROM OWNER PRIOR TO PROJECT EXECUTION. ,, / \ • CONTRACTOR SMALL VERIFY PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES PER PLAN. \ ° CONTRACTOR TO ASSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE IN ALL PLANTING AREAS 2% MINIMUM ALLOWED. / \ / \ 6 • AFTER FINISH GRADES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED IN PLANTING AREAS, CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE SOIL SAMPLES TAKEN AT THE LOCATIONS INDICATED BY DESIGNATION . THESE SAMPLES SHALL BE / \ 4 \ / , \ TESTED BY SOIL AND PLANT LAB (714) 556-8333 FOR SOIL FERTILITY, AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY TEST AND SOIL PREPARATION RECOMMENDATIONS. TWO SAMPLES SHALL BE TAKEN AT EACH LOCATION: V / \ \ ��JJ ♦ .M (1) GROUND LEVEL TO TO- DEEP, (2) 24" to 36" DEEP. EACH SAMPLE SHALL CONTAIN / \ r APPROXIMATELY 1 QUART OF SOIL AND BE LABELED PER LOCATION AND DEPTH, CONTRACTOR. SHALL INSTALL SOIL PREPARATION AND 13ACKFILL MIX TO CONFORM TO THESE RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY UPON RECEIPT OF WRITTEN CHANGE ORDER FROM OWNER. SUBMIT SOIL REPORT TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: PRIOR TO PLANTING. GiOUNDCOVERS SHALL BE TRIANGULARLY SPACED. 114 AREAS WITH EXISTING TURF OR GPOUNDCOVER,�CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIR OF BARE SPOTS AT ALL SCARS DUE TO IRRIGATION INSTALLATION AND MATCH EXISTING PLANTING To ACHIEVE A UNIFORM OVERALL APPEARANCE. 'V \ \ S �• — — — ° KILL AND REMOVE ALL EXISTING WEEDS FROM SITE AREAS. FOR PREVENTION OF T2 WEEDS GR!41RATION / WITH HYDROSEED OPTION ONLY, SPRAY ENTIRE PLANTPNG AREA SOIL WITH PRE -EMERGENT HERBICIDE / /2J RECOMMENDATION AND APPLIED BY AN APPROVED PEST CONTROL ADVISOR. APPLY IMMEDIATELY BEFORE / �/ \\ \M \ \ HYDROSEEDING AND AFTER ROOTED GROUNDVERS HAVE BEEN PLANTED. AVOID WATER RUN-OFF OR ro / \ '• SOIL EROSION AFTER THE PRE -EMERGENT HERBICIDE HAS BEEN APPLIED. ZSI8 LOCATIONS OF EXISTING TREES ARE APPROXIMATE. IF DURING GRADING, EXISTING GRADING CANNOT BE MAINTAINED WITHIN DRIPLINE OF TREE, CONTACT LANDSCAPE G1." ARCHITECT FOR DIRECTION PRIOR TO \ �W CONTINUATION OF GRADING. Su4 ALL SOIL FOR LANDSCAPE PLANTING AREAS OR BERMS SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM ON -SITE EXCAVATIONS. SHOULD IMPORT SOIL BE NECESSARY, INDICATE SOURCE LOCATION. SOIL SHALL BE • SANDY LOAM. CONTAINING NO TOXIC CHEMICALS OR ELEMENTS WHICH MAX INHIBIT OR RETARD NORMAL PLANT GROWTH. SOIL TESTING RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO SOIL IMPLEMENTATION. — — — — — - CONTRACTOR SHALL LIST ALL EXISTING TREES THAT HAVE HAD WORK PERFORMED WITHIN 6' OF TRUNK ----- ---- --- --- ON HIS PLANT MATERIAL GUARANTEE. ° ALL LA.Ic SCARED AREAS (EXCLUDING TURF) A' i LESS THAN A 2:1 SLOPE SHALL BE MULCHED WITH A 21' DEEP LAYER OF 'MEDIUM GRIND MULCH' A) THE CONCLUSION OF PLANTING OPERATIONS SU LIED BY MICHAEL RAWLS COMPANY (714) 633-3666. G 1 \ ALL TREES IN PARKING ISLANDS TO HAVE ROOT BARRIERS BY DEEP ROOT CORPORATION G714i 898- T2 t S3 Y,p,-.. - <." 0563. T4 ° CONTRACTOR TO OBI"AIN COPY OF LATEST CIVIL ENGINEER'S PARKING STRIPING PLAN. TREES ARE INTENDED TO BE PLACED IN LINE WITH PARKING STRIPES WHFtEVEP POSSIBLE. CONTACT LA'SiSCAPE ARCHI'CT IMMEDIATELY IF CONFLICTS OCCUR WITH LIGHT STANDARDS. I ANNUAL COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. \ ° LOCATIONS OF CONTAINER POTS TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FILLING WITH SOIL MIX. / \ • AT EDGES OF PUNTING AREAS, THE CENTER LINE OF THE LAST ROW OF SHRUBS AND/OR GROUIDODVER SHALL BE LOCATED NO FARTHER FROM THE EDGE THAN ONE-HALF THE SPECIFIED ON -CENTER SPACING. NOTE: ALL 2:1 SLOPES TO RECEIVE JUTE MESH ►1 J S 6111 T 2Y�ev� c �� cEia Q N - 5x SSt:c O T E Zip= U n 2 Q ° N Q F-- 0 Z .K c Z 6t. 5 z 0 N W IY n V) z 0 U 5 Q 2 0 � 0 o 1 Z � Q J 0- 3 ;7, C v 0 Z _J w o ( LL- _ 0 z Q U < J �( CL :D . o �UW� CL 0 Q o �' < U LLJ � Z: 0 in Z ~~�~ Q � °D o Q �Qo(L J Quo= z 0 FEB 28199 V) 0 0 z C x in 0 0 QaU . I. SHEET NO. L 6.1 OF 7 SHTS oc,auc..+os, November 16, 1988 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTN: JAY GARCIA FROM: Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: MARINERS CHURCH EXPANSION FAIR SHARE FEES ( hQollvDfzloyl` Fc,wow Sb6p ) The traffic study for the subject project contains a detailed, site -specific projection of the traffic that would be generated by the proposed expansion. The Fair Share fee based upon this projection is $37,722.60. The fee was calculated based on the following: 380 additional trips per day Fair Share fee of $99.27 per daily trip Please let me know if you need any additional information regarding the fee for this project. Sincerely, 4Richard M. fdmonston Traffic Engineer DEFCVEREPUUNERSFRP ARCHUECfURE PLANNING DESIGN A California Corporation November 30, 1988 City of Newport Beach Planning Department Subject: Mariners Church Dear Sir: The following statements are in compliance to the "Conditions of Approval", Use Permit No. 1726. Condition: 1. To the best of my knowledge, all previous conditions have been met. 5. A minimum of 45 minutes will be provided between first and second services on Sunday mornings as presently scheduled. 15. Landscaping will be regularly maintained and kept free of weeds and debris. All plants will be regularly trimmed and kept in healthy condition. 26. All evening activities shall be contained within buildings with windows and doors closed with the exception of the period between June 15th and September 15th, when outside activities may last until 9:30 p.m. 29. Heavy landscape planting does not permit automobile headlights to strike adjacent residential windows in the residential area southerly of Bison Avenue. 30. The air handling unit closest to the property line has an estimated 90 DB rating, the outdoor sound attenuation will be approximately 40 DB to the property line. Therefore, the DB rating at the property would be a maximum of 50 DB. ot,�.�..� up I,ti-rEw C!vLoKk Ru A-cO"srtc.M. eN4 wlt,t, Oie �J Sincerely, YI-EQo'nen Pt2x� cER-T1rAcr-M O� �O Vti OP ocouwt>ntcy, _ e o VrI Ald Kaessner, A.I.A. DK/je Dell H. DeRevere, ALA; Royce A. Wise, ALA; John R. Garakian, AIA; DanielR. McAllister, AIA Q yl .a• .t-r 463I Teller Avenue, Suite 100 Nemport Beach, California 92660, (714) 833-2021 1322 BELL AVE., SUITE 1-N, TUSTIN, CA 92680 TELEPHONE 714/259-1464 13RINTON ASSOCIATES, INC. ELECTRICAL • ENGINEERING • CONSULTANTS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 1000 Bison Avenue Newport Beach, CA Use Permit No. 1726 PC #1772-88 and PC 1773-88 RE: Light Spillage and Glare Attn: PlAihning Dept. Project: Mariniers Church 11-29-88 The On -site lighting system is so designed and directed, as well as maintained so as to conceal the light source and minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent properties. Respectfully,07 Joan enior Amendola, SElectrical Designer. November 16, 1988 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTN: JAY GARCIA FROM: Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: MARINERS CHURCH EXPANSION FAIR SHARE FEES The traffic study for the subject project contains a detailed, site —specific projection of the traffic that would be generated by the proposed expansion. The Fair Share fee based upon this projection is $37,722.60. The fee was calculated based on the following: 380 additional trips per day Fair Share fee of $99.27 per daily trip Please let me know if you need any additional information regarding the fee for this project. Sincerely, Richard Mlonston Traffic Engineer RED Cep t�N' N NPoRry°F98e a �q c4u C/Y SAN JOAQUIN HIIWRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR (SJHT*E PROGRAM CALCULATION SHEET BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK NO. • OWNER'S NAME '' {' ANyof fu CN' It (,R BUILDING ADDRESS 100o Nsod AveeruE 1. Area of Benefit (AOB): a. Not in AOB (No fee required) b. Zone A Single Family Residence. . . . . $1,372/D.U. 11 Multi Unit Residential. . . . . .$ 799/D.U. ElNon -Residential. . . . . . . . . $1.84/sq.ft. C. Zone B Er Single Family Residence. . . . . $1,062/D.U. Multi Unit Residential. . . . . .$ 620/D.U. • El Non -Residential. . . . . . . . . $1.36/sq.ft. 2. Fee Calculation: is 3 a. Residential: Increase in number of Dwellings (IDU) (If IDU — 0 or less, no fee required) IDU x Unit Fee — SJHTC FEE B. Non Residential: Increase in gross square footage of building area (IBA)* sq.ft. (If IBA — 0 or less, no fee required) 24,333 IBA x 1136 Sq.Ft. Fee a 33,012- ' SJHTC FEE *Do not include parking structures. Exemptions to Fee Parking structures Properties exempt from property tax government -own c utilities to the extent they are not used for generating revenue or for commercial purposes. (Privately owned utilities, are not exempt). Institutional uses, i.e., universities, colleges and ,11YL regional parks. U 4. Total San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee $ 33,Og2.8Y (Enter amount on Building Permit Application Form)